WEBVTT - The Takedown Of Blake Lively

0:00:10.327 --> 0:00:13.047
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to a MoMA Mia podcast.

0:00:13.727 --> 0:00:16.767
<v Speaker 2>Mamma Mia acknowledges the traditional owners of land and waters

0:00:16.807 --> 0:00:23.767
<v Speaker 2>that this podcast is recorded on Hello and welcome to

0:00:23.807 --> 0:00:26.567
<v Speaker 2>Mamma Mia out Loud. It's what women are actually talking

0:00:26.607 --> 0:00:30.887
<v Speaker 2>about on Monday, the nineteenth of August. I'm Holly Wainwright.

0:00:30.647 --> 0:00:31.767
<v Speaker 3>I'm Jesse Stevens.

0:00:31.967 --> 0:00:34.087
<v Speaker 1>I'm mea Friedman. No, no, I'm still at the logis.

0:00:35.567 --> 0:00:36.967
<v Speaker 3>What time did you have to get there? Yesterday?

0:00:37.687 --> 0:00:37.967
<v Speaker 4>God?

0:00:38.007 --> 0:00:40.367
<v Speaker 1>I got their hat. The red carpet started at three

0:00:40.367 --> 0:00:43.727
<v Speaker 1>point thirty, so we got there at four. I left there.

0:00:44.007 --> 0:00:46.327
<v Speaker 1>I was the first one in Anoba, Brunna and I

0:00:46.567 --> 0:00:50.847
<v Speaker 1>and that was midnight, just after midnight, maybe quarter past twelve.

0:00:51.487 --> 0:00:54.167
<v Speaker 2>I'm justay. So the outlouders are aware. Mia does not

0:00:54.407 --> 0:00:59.167
<v Speaker 2>generally do long long events. That's an absolute marathon for

0:00:59.367 --> 0:01:02.967
<v Speaker 2>event friend events at all. Anyway, on the show today,

0:01:03.087 --> 0:01:05.647
<v Speaker 2>as already discussed, Mia is going to tell us about

0:01:05.647 --> 0:01:08.047
<v Speaker 2>the logis. She's very, very tired, as she said, but

0:01:08.127 --> 0:01:10.127
<v Speaker 2>she's a professional, God damn it, and she's going to

0:01:10.167 --> 0:01:15.567
<v Speaker 2>push through. Also, why is absolutely everything suddenly Blake Lively's fault?

0:01:15.687 --> 0:01:19.727
<v Speaker 2>The anatomy of a mighty backlash and why five people

0:01:19.767 --> 0:01:23.167
<v Speaker 2>have been charged with the death of friend's icon Matthew Perry.

0:01:23.287 --> 0:01:27.207
<v Speaker 2>But first, Jesse, in case you missed it, today, the

0:01:27.247 --> 0:01:31.367
<v Speaker 2>three of us are looking very demure. We're being very mindful,

0:01:31.607 --> 0:01:34.567
<v Speaker 2>very cutesye and if that doesn't make sense to you,

0:01:34.647 --> 0:01:38.647
<v Speaker 2>welcome to the Internet. A TikTok trend has thrusted the

0:01:38.687 --> 0:01:42.647
<v Speaker 2>word demure back into the lexicon, even though I'm fairly

0:01:42.687 --> 0:01:45.927
<v Speaker 2>certain that most people don't actually know what it means.

0:01:46.487 --> 0:01:49.527
<v Speaker 2>It all started with a TikTok creator named Jules Lebron

0:01:49.647 --> 0:01:53.367
<v Speaker 2>posting a video with tips about managing you know, your

0:01:53.367 --> 0:01:56.207
<v Speaker 2>makeup and your mustache sweat, how to deal with it.

0:01:56.447 --> 0:01:59.167
<v Speaker 2>Here's what she said in the og video.

0:01:59.847 --> 0:02:03.007
<v Speaker 4>Very demure, very mindful. I don't come to work with

0:02:03.047 --> 0:02:05.767
<v Speaker 4>a green cut crew, don't look like a clown. When

0:02:05.807 --> 0:02:07.847
<v Speaker 4>I go to work, I don't do too much. I'm

0:02:07.927 --> 0:02:11.607
<v Speaker 4>very mindful while I'm out. See how I look very presentable.

0:02:11.727 --> 0:02:13.887
<v Speaker 4>The way I came to the interview is the way

0:02:13.887 --> 0:02:16.327
<v Speaker 4>I go to the job. A lot of you girls

0:02:16.327 --> 0:02:18.887
<v Speaker 4>go to the interview looking like Marriage Simpson and go

0:02:18.967 --> 0:02:22.487
<v Speaker 4>to the job looking like Patty and Selma, not demure.

0:02:22.807 --> 0:02:25.807
<v Speaker 4>I'm very modest, I'm very mindful. You see my shirt

0:02:26.367 --> 0:02:29.807
<v Speaker 4>only a little chi chio, not my be mindful of

0:02:29.887 --> 0:02:33.687
<v Speaker 4>why they hired you. Here's your reality check, diva. What's

0:02:33.727 --> 0:02:35.287
<v Speaker 4>the name you'd like me to make it out to?

0:02:35.567 --> 0:02:35.767
<v Speaker 5>Oh?

0:02:35.807 --> 0:02:36.527
<v Speaker 2>I love it.

0:02:36.527 --> 0:02:40.327
<v Speaker 5>It's the context to this is that Jules Lebron is

0:02:40.527 --> 0:02:45.327
<v Speaker 5>a trans woman, and so there's something very ironic and

0:02:45.647 --> 0:02:49.887
<v Speaker 5>she is being sarcastic with a raised eyebrow speaking about

0:02:50.087 --> 0:02:54.567
<v Speaker 5>femininity and gender in a way that's actually very cool

0:02:54.647 --> 0:02:56.127
<v Speaker 5>and very transgressive.

0:02:56.527 --> 0:02:59.047
<v Speaker 1>It's like a bit and she's really lent in. Since

0:02:59.087 --> 0:03:01.927
<v Speaker 1>it's gone viral, she's lent in. And now if you

0:03:02.007 --> 0:03:05.967
<v Speaker 1>go to her account, there's like twenty different reels of

0:03:06.007 --> 0:03:09.047
<v Speaker 1>her at the airport. How to be mindful at the airport.

0:03:09.047 --> 0:03:11.007
<v Speaker 1>It's like, I just have a soda at the airport,

0:03:11.167 --> 0:03:14.527
<v Speaker 1>very mindful, very demure. I'm not like you other girls

0:03:14.527 --> 0:03:14.927
<v Speaker 1>who do.

0:03:15.007 --> 0:03:19.527
<v Speaker 5>Shut because demure means reserved and shy.

0:03:19.407 --> 0:03:20.487
<v Speaker 1>And kind of feminist.

0:03:21.167 --> 0:03:24.727
<v Speaker 5>Femin and the trend then, you know, took on a

0:03:24.767 --> 0:03:27.367
<v Speaker 5>life of its own. And you see women going, see

0:03:27.367 --> 0:03:30.367
<v Speaker 5>how I'm eating this donut, very demure, and they're just

0:03:30.407 --> 0:03:33.367
<v Speaker 5>like eating a donut like a mad person, or like

0:03:33.767 --> 0:03:37.087
<v Speaker 5>having a diet coke fountain in my house is very demure,

0:03:37.167 --> 0:03:41.207
<v Speaker 5>which it's not. That's the opposite of So that's why

0:03:41.287 --> 0:03:43.167
<v Speaker 5>it's funny. Have you guys heard this everywhere?

0:03:43.287 --> 0:03:43.567
<v Speaker 4>Look?

0:03:43.687 --> 0:03:44.047
<v Speaker 2>I have.

0:03:44.447 --> 0:03:47.167
<v Speaker 1>And the thing about the internet now, and I know

0:03:47.207 --> 0:03:49.167
<v Speaker 1>that some out louders are like, well are you talking

0:03:49.167 --> 0:03:51.447
<v Speaker 1>about things that are on TikTok? The thing with TikTok

0:03:51.607 --> 0:03:55.607
<v Speaker 1>is that it is dictating culture. And I like that

0:03:55.647 --> 0:03:58.087
<v Speaker 1>there are just random, weird, funny things, but it can

0:03:58.127 --> 0:04:00.727
<v Speaker 1>often feel like the culture has become a joke that

0:04:00.767 --> 0:04:03.767
<v Speaker 1>you're never in on. It's an inside joke, and by

0:04:03.807 --> 0:04:06.927
<v Speaker 1>the time someone explains the joke to you, it's not

0:04:07.007 --> 0:04:09.447
<v Speaker 1>at all funny. And also it's over and there's another one,

0:04:10.567 --> 0:04:13.967
<v Speaker 1>And so you can have that constant feeling like you're

0:04:14.047 --> 0:04:16.527
<v Speaker 1>always just out of the loop, or that you've sort

0:04:16.527 --> 0:04:18.887
<v Speaker 1>of come in halfway through a conversation. And even if

0:04:18.927 --> 0:04:21.287
<v Speaker 1>you're fluent in TikTok and the Internet, which we all are,

0:04:22.407 --> 0:04:25.247
<v Speaker 1>it can be really hard to get to the bottom

0:04:25.287 --> 0:04:28.487
<v Speaker 1>of what it actually is. Like I remember we slipped

0:04:28.527 --> 0:04:31.287
<v Speaker 1>back bun and whatever that thing was when we did

0:04:31.327 --> 0:04:34.807
<v Speaker 1>the stupid dance. I had to google what it means

0:04:34.847 --> 0:04:36.567
<v Speaker 1>and then you go down this rabbit hole and then

0:04:36.567 --> 0:04:39.647
<v Speaker 1>you're like, I have a life. I have a mortgage

0:04:39.647 --> 0:04:46.487
<v Speaker 1>of responsibilities. I can't be playing CSI TikTok every three days.

0:04:46.767 --> 0:04:51.727
<v Speaker 2>Also, the speed is remarkable, right because I'm probably quite

0:04:51.927 --> 0:04:54.127
<v Speaker 2>basic when it comes to this stuff, and I open

0:04:54.247 --> 0:04:58.247
<v Speaker 2>probably my Instagram on Saturday, and suddenly everybody's demule, like

0:04:58.287 --> 0:05:01.967
<v Speaker 2>suddenly just everything, and then the Logi's red carpet last night,

0:05:02.167 --> 0:05:04.327
<v Speaker 2>and Tony Armstrong and his girlfriend are making a joke

0:05:04.367 --> 0:05:07.087
<v Speaker 2>about being demure, like it's just super super quick, and

0:05:07.127 --> 0:05:09.487
<v Speaker 2>then it will be gone again in a day, as

0:05:09.527 --> 0:05:12.247
<v Speaker 2>you say me. So by the time my children get

0:05:12.247 --> 0:05:14.807
<v Speaker 2>home tonight and I asked them about being demure, they

0:05:14.847 --> 0:05:17.127
<v Speaker 2>will think I'm the most embarrassing thing that ever lived.

0:05:17.247 --> 0:05:21.287
<v Speaker 5>And what's hard to is that it's really difficult to

0:05:21.367 --> 0:05:23.127
<v Speaker 5>determine where any of these things start.

0:05:23.247 --> 0:05:24.687
<v Speaker 3>I always want to go back to the start.

0:05:24.767 --> 0:05:26.847
<v Speaker 5>I think it was like Friday night and I was

0:05:26.887 --> 0:05:29.807
<v Speaker 5>in the depths of TikTok, being like, where did demure start?

0:05:30.327 --> 0:05:33.167
<v Speaker 3>Was it a Kardashian thing? It used to be that.

0:05:33.207 --> 0:05:35.727
<v Speaker 5>It was some massive cultural icon who would start a

0:05:35.767 --> 0:05:37.687
<v Speaker 5>trend like jewels.

0:05:37.567 --> 0:05:39.647
<v Speaker 1>Well, like raygun you could see, like the internet was

0:05:39.687 --> 0:05:42.647
<v Speaker 1>doing all these memes and takes on ygun, but you

0:05:42.647 --> 0:05:45.127
<v Speaker 1>could see that was an actual thing that happened, that

0:05:45.367 --> 0:05:48.567
<v Speaker 1>had global significance and everyone could go and see it,

0:05:49.167 --> 0:05:51.127
<v Speaker 1>and it was all just versions of that. But sometimes

0:05:51.127 --> 0:05:54.007
<v Speaker 1>it's like the vernacular where you just don't understand it

0:05:54.047 --> 0:05:57.527
<v Speaker 1>and you always feel like you're just a little bit behind.

0:05:57.847 --> 0:06:01.767
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, look, headline is the three of us not very general,

0:06:01.967 --> 0:06:05.207
<v Speaker 5>not very.

0:06:04.407 --> 0:06:09.127
<v Speaker 1>And the Gold Logi goes to Larry MD.

0:06:10.487 --> 0:06:14.287
<v Speaker 5>Last night was the sixty fourth TV week Logi Awards,

0:06:14.407 --> 0:06:17.207
<v Speaker 5>and Mia Friedman, who was sitting in the front row,

0:06:17.367 --> 0:06:22.407
<v Speaker 5>somehow cried three times and clapped too loudly once. If

0:06:22.447 --> 0:06:25.327
<v Speaker 5>you squinted, you could see her dancing to the John

0:06:25.367 --> 0:06:29.287
<v Speaker 5>Farnham tribute and maybe also darting to the bathroom every

0:06:29.327 --> 0:06:33.127
<v Speaker 5>fifteen minutes, not to do illicit substances, but because her

0:06:33.127 --> 0:06:36.847
<v Speaker 5>bladder can't hold much these days. There's so much to

0:06:36.967 --> 0:06:39.247
<v Speaker 5>unpack and we haven't spoken properly about it yet, so

0:06:39.287 --> 0:06:42.167
<v Speaker 5>we thought we'd do our catch up on the show. Mia,

0:06:42.407 --> 0:06:45.967
<v Speaker 5>Can we please start with what you wore? Was it demure?

0:06:46.047 --> 0:06:49.247
<v Speaker 5>Because everyone saw demure that you threw out and then

0:06:49.287 --> 0:06:51.367
<v Speaker 5>everyone was just sitting there on Instagram being like, oh,

0:06:51.407 --> 0:06:53.967
<v Speaker 5>Maya will post what she's wearing. And then we waited,

0:06:53.967 --> 0:06:56.687
<v Speaker 5>and we waited and we waited, and then Larry Emda

0:06:56.847 --> 0:06:59.047
<v Speaker 5>won a go logan. Wait did she even show up

0:06:59.487 --> 0:07:00.047
<v Speaker 5>the next day?

0:07:00.207 --> 0:07:00.487
<v Speaker 6>Yes?

0:07:00.607 --> 0:07:03.687
<v Speaker 3>Where's your dress? What was it? What do it look like? Please?

0:07:03.927 --> 0:07:06.447
<v Speaker 1>I have a thing where I don't get excited about

0:07:06.447 --> 0:07:08.807
<v Speaker 1>event dressing. I love clothes as our ladders. No, I

0:07:08.847 --> 0:07:13.167
<v Speaker 1>love clothes more than anything, and yet anything red carpet

0:07:13.207 --> 0:07:15.047
<v Speaker 1>it just doesn't feel interesting to me because there's no

0:07:15.127 --> 0:07:18.167
<v Speaker 1>styling involved. It's just like one dress and a shoe,

0:07:18.487 --> 0:07:22.447
<v Speaker 1>which to me is not very creative. So I think

0:07:22.487 --> 0:07:25.687
<v Speaker 1>that's at my heart of complete apathy about.

0:07:25.367 --> 0:07:26.247
<v Speaker 3>These were you not?

0:07:26.887 --> 0:07:29.407
<v Speaker 5>Holly and I were in the depths of panic on

0:07:29.447 --> 0:07:32.167
<v Speaker 5>Sunday morning when we woke up and we saw that

0:07:32.327 --> 0:07:35.327
<v Speaker 5>people were getting their hair and makeup done. They were

0:07:35.367 --> 0:07:38.447
<v Speaker 5>walking down the street in their ballgowns. Sarah Harris looked stunning.

0:07:38.527 --> 0:07:41.647
<v Speaker 5>We saw Laura Byrne and Britt Hockley, they were just

0:07:41.767 --> 0:07:43.727
<v Speaker 5>in these dun downs and we were going, me out

0:07:43.807 --> 0:07:46.967
<v Speaker 5>is woefully unprepared hair, yet.

0:07:46.847 --> 0:07:49.407
<v Speaker 2>It's trying down to get really worried about her when

0:07:49.447 --> 0:07:51.807
<v Speaker 2>it was mid morning on Sunday and I messaged and

0:07:51.847 --> 0:07:54.127
<v Speaker 2>I was like, baby spiraling, spiralingly.

0:07:54.127 --> 0:07:57.047
<v Speaker 1>You could feel it. I wasn't spiraling.

0:07:57.487 --> 0:07:59.927
<v Speaker 2>Two hours away, I could sense it. I'm like, why

0:08:00.007 --> 0:08:01.727
<v Speaker 2>isn't she dressed? What's going on?

0:08:02.967 --> 0:08:06.247
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't spiraling. I just was like not being able

0:08:06.287 --> 0:08:09.887
<v Speaker 1>to summon myself to care, because I mean to say

0:08:09.927 --> 0:08:12.407
<v Speaker 1>that I was a side character last night is a

0:08:12.447 --> 0:08:15.567
<v Speaker 1>gross understatement. I was there because Strife, of which I'm

0:08:15.607 --> 0:08:19.167
<v Speaker 1>an executive producer, was nominated for Best Comedy. I was

0:08:19.247 --> 0:08:23.527
<v Speaker 1>legitimately invited, but I get very intimidated by those things.

0:08:23.527 --> 0:08:26.847
<v Speaker 1>And I until about two hours, three hours before, I

0:08:26.927 --> 0:08:29.487
<v Speaker 1>was still considering not going because I've also been sick,

0:08:29.527 --> 0:08:32.087
<v Speaker 1>and I was just like I could ostensibly get away

0:08:32.087 --> 0:08:33.367
<v Speaker 1>with chucking Asiki.

0:08:33.567 --> 0:08:35.927
<v Speaker 5>I think where you were at on Sunday. I've had

0:08:36.007 --> 0:08:38.447
<v Speaker 5>nightmares about being in that situation. And it's like my

0:08:38.527 --> 0:08:40.967
<v Speaker 5>school formal and all the other girls were getting their

0:08:40.967 --> 0:08:43.047
<v Speaker 5>hair and makeup done, and they had bought really fancy

0:08:43.127 --> 0:08:45.247
<v Speaker 5>dresses and I'd gone with mum, and my dress was

0:08:45.287 --> 0:08:46.407
<v Speaker 5>secondhand and didn't fit.

0:08:47.287 --> 0:08:49.207
<v Speaker 3>That's what I was worried about.

0:08:49.247 --> 0:08:50.807
<v Speaker 5>Well, you're not worried that everyone else was getting their

0:08:50.807 --> 0:08:52.927
<v Speaker 5>hair and makeup professionally done and you had you and

0:08:52.967 --> 0:08:53.647
<v Speaker 5>your ghday.

0:08:53.767 --> 0:08:57.167
<v Speaker 1>Yes no, and then yes no. I was all confident.

0:08:57.247 --> 0:09:00.287
<v Speaker 2>You're confident in your offering, right Maas I.

0:09:00.327 --> 0:09:03.447
<v Speaker 1>Know I would say I'm lazy and I couldn't be bothered.

0:09:03.567 --> 0:09:06.087
<v Speaker 1>So I was offered by Binge a slot at eight

0:09:06.207 --> 0:09:08.807
<v Speaker 1>thirty in the morning, and I was just like, lull,

0:09:09.327 --> 0:09:11.327
<v Speaker 1>it's already going to be a marathon. Can you imagine

0:09:11.367 --> 0:09:13.487
<v Speaker 1>going and getting your hair and makeupsne? I just don't

0:09:13.487 --> 0:09:16.967
<v Speaker 1>care enough. And I also quite like the getting ready part.

0:09:17.047 --> 0:09:19.527
<v Speaker 1>That's actually more of my favorite thing is putting on

0:09:19.527 --> 0:09:22.047
<v Speaker 1>the makeup. I'm not very good at putting on a

0:09:22.047 --> 0:09:24.007
<v Speaker 1>lot of makeup, but I always just like to look

0:09:24.087 --> 0:09:25.567
<v Speaker 1>like myself, and I feel like when you get your

0:09:25.607 --> 0:09:27.407
<v Speaker 1>hair and makeup done, you've got to make a lot

0:09:27.407 --> 0:09:29.807
<v Speaker 1>of small talk. And also I just don't ever quite

0:09:29.807 --> 0:09:34.527
<v Speaker 1>feel like myself anyway. Bloody, first world, lovely problems. So

0:09:34.607 --> 0:09:37.247
<v Speaker 1>I also knew that I had a number of things

0:09:37.287 --> 0:09:39.967
<v Speaker 1>in my wardrobe because I wear kind of things that

0:09:40.007 --> 0:09:42.327
<v Speaker 1>most people might wear to on a red carpet, like

0:09:42.407 --> 0:09:45.287
<v Speaker 1>just to work on a Tuesday, right, So it's not

0:09:45.367 --> 0:09:47.367
<v Speaker 1>like I was like, oh, I don't have anything fancy.

0:09:47.367 --> 0:09:51.127
<v Speaker 1>I've got so much fancy stuff, and so I knew

0:09:51.207 --> 0:09:53.727
<v Speaker 1>that what I wanted to wear was probably in there,

0:09:53.807 --> 0:09:56.847
<v Speaker 1>and if it wasn't, that was kind of exciting because

0:09:56.887 --> 0:09:59.847
<v Speaker 1>I'd have to make it work. You're looking horrified.

0:10:00.207 --> 0:10:02.287
<v Speaker 5>I am, Okay, tell us what you chose, because I saw,

0:10:02.327 --> 0:10:04.407
<v Speaker 5>I actually liked of all your options that you shared

0:10:04.447 --> 0:10:06.447
<v Speaker 5>on Instagram, you had a few suit options, you had

0:10:06.447 --> 0:10:08.767
<v Speaker 5>your bratsuit, and I went, that's kind of cool, because

0:10:09.567 --> 0:10:11.127
<v Speaker 5>but then what did you choose?

0:10:11.167 --> 0:10:11.967
<v Speaker 3>Please tell us?

0:10:12.007 --> 0:10:14.247
<v Speaker 1>Okay, was it something you know quite well? Because I

0:10:14.287 --> 0:10:15.407
<v Speaker 1>wore it to your wedding, so.

0:10:15.447 --> 0:10:17.527
<v Speaker 3>I knew you'd wear the dress. Yeah.

0:10:17.567 --> 0:10:19.647
<v Speaker 1>So there's a good story behind this because I bought

0:10:20.167 --> 0:10:24.527
<v Speaker 1>this skirt from a lady startup called Jumbled, which is

0:10:24.727 --> 0:10:27.487
<v Speaker 1>a brilliant boutique in Orange, and we were there for

0:10:27.527 --> 0:10:29.727
<v Speaker 1>a show quite a few years ago, maybe three years ago.

0:10:29.927 --> 0:10:32.847
<v Speaker 1>Time is slippery to me. But and then I really

0:10:32.927 --> 0:10:35.247
<v Speaker 1>liked it. It was kind of sequined, but muted sequined,

0:10:35.247 --> 0:10:37.687
<v Speaker 1>if that makes sense. And so then I went online

0:10:37.687 --> 0:10:40.407
<v Speaker 1>and found a matching top, but the top was like

0:10:40.927 --> 0:10:44.087
<v Speaker 1>a bit cropped, so I wasn't gonna wear a crop top.

0:10:44.207 --> 0:10:46.887
<v Speaker 1>And this was years ago. And so then for your wedding, Jesse,

0:10:47.007 --> 0:10:48.527
<v Speaker 1>when I went through a similar thing and tried on

0:10:48.567 --> 0:10:51.527
<v Speaker 1>eight billion dresses, I took the top and the skirt

0:10:51.567 --> 0:10:54.887
<v Speaker 1>to my alterationist. Is anyone still listening? This is so boring.

0:10:55.487 --> 0:10:57.647
<v Speaker 1>I took it to my alterationist and got her to

0:10:57.687 --> 0:11:01.087
<v Speaker 1>turn it into just one dress, and so I had that,

0:11:01.367 --> 0:11:03.647
<v Speaker 1>and I tried on a bunch of stuff, and in

0:11:03.687 --> 0:11:06.087
<v Speaker 1>the end that worked for the same reason that it

0:11:06.167 --> 0:11:08.887
<v Speaker 1>worked for your wedding, because it was me in that

0:11:08.967 --> 0:11:12.847
<v Speaker 1>it was. It was fancier than I'd usually wear because

0:11:12.887 --> 0:11:15.367
<v Speaker 1>it was like a dress, and yet it was like

0:11:15.607 --> 0:11:18.567
<v Speaker 1>muted sequence. It didn't feel attention grabby.

0:11:18.767 --> 0:11:21.527
<v Speaker 2>The thing that's interesting about this whole thing, and we

0:11:21.607 --> 0:11:23.407
<v Speaker 2>have to find out if there was anything fun about

0:11:23.407 --> 0:11:26.247
<v Speaker 2>the logis is that this kind of stuff is your

0:11:26.247 --> 0:11:28.887
<v Speaker 2>worst nightmare. You have anxiety around going to these kind

0:11:28.887 --> 0:11:31.007
<v Speaker 2>of big social things, don't you. I want to give

0:11:31.047 --> 0:11:33.447
<v Speaker 2>some context that when I used to work at TV Week,

0:11:33.527 --> 0:11:36.567
<v Speaker 2>who obviously organize the logis it's a big thing. Some

0:11:36.687 --> 0:11:40.487
<v Speaker 2>people are so desperate to go to that event. I

0:11:40.567 --> 0:11:43.727
<v Speaker 2>remember the year I was working at TV week one

0:11:44.207 --> 0:11:47.367
<v Speaker 2>down the list. Celebrity was so desperate for a ticket

0:11:47.447 --> 0:11:49.727
<v Speaker 2>and the editor was like, no, you can't have a ticket.

0:11:49.767 --> 0:11:52.367
<v Speaker 2>Were full that She said, if I shaved my head,

0:11:52.527 --> 0:11:53.167
<v Speaker 2>can I come?

0:11:53.287 --> 0:11:53.767
<v Speaker 3>Oh wow?

0:11:53.807 --> 0:11:56.727
<v Speaker 2>And the editor said yes and she did. That is

0:11:56.767 --> 0:11:59.007
<v Speaker 2>how desperate some people are to be on that red

0:11:59.007 --> 0:12:03.247
<v Speaker 2>carpet because it's about and probably less so now, but

0:12:03.287 --> 0:12:05.527
<v Speaker 2>it's the attention economy, right, And if you're trying to

0:12:05.527 --> 0:12:08.047
<v Speaker 2>get somewhere, if you're trying to be noticed, if you're

0:12:08.087 --> 0:12:10.247
<v Speaker 2>trying to meet the right people, it's a really big deal.

0:12:10.527 --> 0:12:12.927
<v Speaker 2>But all of that kind of stuff, that networking kind

0:12:12.967 --> 0:12:15.327
<v Speaker 2>of stuff is your worst nightmare, right manea. But had

0:12:15.327 --> 0:12:19.167
<v Speaker 2>a thing fun about being there, do you know what?

0:12:19.247 --> 0:12:21.727
<v Speaker 1>I had a really fun time, apart from the fact

0:12:21.767 --> 0:12:23.727
<v Speaker 1>that it was so long. It was like being on

0:12:23.767 --> 0:12:24.887
<v Speaker 1>a long haul flight.

0:12:25.327 --> 0:12:27.127
<v Speaker 2>Why but then you got off.

0:12:26.927 --> 0:12:30.207
<v Speaker 1>And you were still in the same place. I don't know.

0:12:30.287 --> 0:12:32.047
<v Speaker 1>But by the time we sat down. So some people,

0:12:32.087 --> 0:12:34.527
<v Speaker 1>who do they talk to kateline Brook she just had

0:12:34.567 --> 0:12:37.327
<v Speaker 1>to do three hours on the red carpet. It was

0:12:37.367 --> 0:12:39.287
<v Speaker 1>funny because we walked up and down the red carpet.

0:12:39.287 --> 0:12:40.727
<v Speaker 1>Brunner and I It looked like we were trying to

0:12:40.727 --> 0:12:42.367
<v Speaker 1>get interviewed, but we were just looking for the mum

0:12:42.367 --> 0:12:44.687
<v Speaker 1>and mea people who were interviewing people in the red

0:12:44.727 --> 0:12:45.967
<v Speaker 1>carp We thought, we've got to talk to them. We

0:12:45.967 --> 0:12:48.247
<v Speaker 1>couldn't find them, so it looked like we were doing

0:12:48.247 --> 0:12:51.367
<v Speaker 1>desperate laps. We eventually found them how to chat with them,

0:12:51.407 --> 0:12:53.487
<v Speaker 1>how to chat to news dot com who made us

0:12:53.527 --> 0:12:57.087
<v Speaker 1>read at Tongue Twister. You know, everyone needs their content right,

0:12:57.927 --> 0:13:00.407
<v Speaker 1>And it was just quite surreal, like it was very intense.

0:13:00.447 --> 0:13:02.167
<v Speaker 1>And then you go inside and it's just like a

0:13:02.167 --> 0:13:04.007
<v Speaker 1>ballroom if you've ever been to any kind of black

0:13:04.047 --> 0:13:06.687
<v Speaker 1>tie thing, and you sit down, but then it was

0:13:06.767 --> 0:13:10.207
<v Speaker 1>two hours until the ceremony started. It fed us, which

0:13:10.207 --> 0:13:11.327
<v Speaker 1>is good because we sat down up.

0:13:11.247 --> 0:13:12.767
<v Speaker 2>For nice food.

0:13:13.647 --> 0:13:17.447
<v Speaker 1>Bruna pap Andrea, who is the main producer of Strife

0:13:17.727 --> 0:13:20.687
<v Speaker 1>and the producer of everything Big Little Eyes and you know,

0:13:20.807 --> 0:13:23.287
<v Speaker 1>she's big time. She's one Golden Globes and Emmy's and

0:13:23.287 --> 0:13:24.847
<v Speaker 1>all of those things. She's been to all of those

0:13:24.887 --> 0:13:27.367
<v Speaker 1>awards ceremonies. She said it was the best food of

0:13:27.407 --> 0:13:29.007
<v Speaker 1>any awards ceremony she's ever been to.

0:13:29.247 --> 0:13:30.327
<v Speaker 3>Was she just being polite?

0:13:30.727 --> 0:13:33.727
<v Speaker 1>No, she was so into it. It was really funny.

0:13:33.807 --> 0:13:36.807
<v Speaker 1>So the other shock was that we were not just

0:13:36.887 --> 0:13:38.967
<v Speaker 1>in the front row of tables, but in the front

0:13:39.047 --> 0:13:41.367
<v Speaker 1>row in the middle of the table, so we were

0:13:41.407 --> 0:13:45.247
<v Speaker 1>practically directly in front of where the people were on.

0:13:45.287 --> 0:13:47.007
<v Speaker 2>That because Asha Keddy was on your table.

0:13:47.087 --> 0:13:49.447
<v Speaker 1>Correct, it wasn't because of my dress. So we were

0:13:49.567 --> 0:13:51.207
<v Speaker 1>on the table with Asher and so she was a

0:13:51.247 --> 0:13:53.767
<v Speaker 1>Gold LOGI nominee, so she's a big deal. And that

0:13:53.927 --> 0:13:55.727
<v Speaker 1>was really interesting too because I've been to the Logis

0:13:55.767 --> 0:13:57.647
<v Speaker 1>one time before, but I was like in the absolute

0:13:57.727 --> 0:13:59.887
<v Speaker 1>bleaches and I was, you know, not really part of

0:13:59.927 --> 0:14:01.607
<v Speaker 1>it at all. It was when I was doing a

0:14:01.647 --> 0:14:03.447
<v Speaker 1>bit of work for the Today Show, so I just

0:14:03.527 --> 0:14:05.327
<v Speaker 1>felt like I was on someone else's ride, which I

0:14:05.367 --> 0:14:08.047
<v Speaker 1>absolutely was. We had a really funny table. It was

0:14:08.047 --> 0:14:13.567
<v Speaker 1>like me Bruna Ash's husband, Alex Demitriardi's Emma Lung Matt Day,

0:14:14.207 --> 0:14:16.847
<v Speaker 1>whose wife is the EP of sixty Minutes and she

0:14:17.047 --> 0:14:18.847
<v Speaker 1>actually won a LOGI I saw that.

0:14:19.047 --> 0:14:21.367
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, So it was just it was a lovely and

0:14:21.767 --> 0:14:24.087
<v Speaker 5>what outfits did you like as someone who was there?

0:14:24.167 --> 0:14:25.447
<v Speaker 3>Like what stood out to you all?

0:14:25.607 --> 0:14:25.727
<v Speaker 7>Right?

0:14:26.247 --> 0:14:29.047
<v Speaker 1>Like there were so many great looks. There was one

0:14:29.047 --> 0:14:31.167
<v Speaker 1>person who was a publicist for Channel nine who I

0:14:31.247 --> 0:14:33.767
<v Speaker 1>just loved her dress. It was like I went and

0:14:33.807 --> 0:14:36.247
<v Speaker 1>tried to buy it. It was from the curve range

0:14:36.647 --> 0:14:38.927
<v Speaker 1>that aesos do and it was just like head to

0:14:38.927 --> 0:14:41.607
<v Speaker 1>toe bright blue sequence and just like she just looked

0:14:41.647 --> 0:14:45.767
<v Speaker 1>so comfortable, and she was wearing like matching glittery blue trainers.

0:14:46.287 --> 0:14:49.887
<v Speaker 1>But you know, like Sonya Krueger always looks incredible. I mean,

0:14:50.167 --> 0:14:54.087
<v Speaker 1>everyone just tried hard, which was so lovely. Julia Morris

0:14:54.087 --> 0:14:57.247
<v Speaker 1>looked beautiful, she was in this huge gown. Kate Langbrook

0:14:57.287 --> 0:15:01.087
<v Speaker 1>looked phenomenal. Lisa McCune's gown was beautiful. I only saw

0:15:01.087 --> 0:15:03.487
<v Speaker 1>her at the end when she was giving the Gold Low.

0:15:03.927 --> 0:15:05.767
<v Speaker 1>And there were lots of people that you just don't know,

0:15:06.287 --> 0:15:08.447
<v Speaker 1>you know, because a lot of shows were nominated, and

0:15:08.527 --> 0:15:10.607
<v Speaker 1>there was the crew and the cast from all of

0:15:10.647 --> 0:15:12.727
<v Speaker 1>those shows, so a lot of behind the scenes people

0:15:12.727 --> 0:15:16.567
<v Speaker 1>were there looking just stunning, like people went to so

0:15:16.727 --> 0:15:19.247
<v Speaker 1>much effort and that was just interesting to look at.

0:15:19.567 --> 0:15:22.287
<v Speaker 1>And then the other highlight was the John Farnham tribute

0:15:22.327 --> 0:15:25.727
<v Speaker 1>with Guys Sebastian and Jessica Mawboy that was so beautiful.

0:15:27.527 --> 0:15:39.527
<v Speaker 2>Were on and I cried lots.

0:15:39.567 --> 0:15:41.287
<v Speaker 1>I didn't expect to cry, but there were lots of

0:15:41.287 --> 0:15:44.967
<v Speaker 1>speeches that men made and boys made about mothers and

0:15:45.007 --> 0:15:47.607
<v Speaker 1>about their mothers. And that fifteen year old guy that

0:15:47.647 --> 0:15:50.767
<v Speaker 1>won the two big awards, the way he spoke about

0:15:50.807 --> 0:15:52.207
<v Speaker 1>his parents and how he cried.

0:15:52.367 --> 0:15:55.327
<v Speaker 7>I'd love to thank my friend's family, my brother and

0:15:55.367 --> 0:16:11.127
<v Speaker 7>my sister, and my mom and dad, and I love

0:16:11.207 --> 0:16:13.207
<v Speaker 7>to thank my drum turg Ninia Townsend.

0:16:13.807 --> 0:16:14.807
<v Speaker 3>Couldn't die it without you.

0:16:19.167 --> 0:16:22.207
<v Speaker 1>I always find it when people are emotional, it's hard

0:16:22.247 --> 0:16:24.087
<v Speaker 1>not to be emotional back. Like it's easy to sit

0:16:24.127 --> 0:16:26.487
<v Speaker 1>at home and be really cynical about the logis and

0:16:26.527 --> 0:16:29.127
<v Speaker 1>I've done that every single year, but when you're actually

0:16:29.127 --> 0:16:33.367
<v Speaker 1>in the room, it's very moving. Like the amount that

0:16:33.407 --> 0:16:36.927
<v Speaker 1>people care to be nominated or to win, like Rebecca

0:16:36.967 --> 0:16:40.967
<v Speaker 1>Gibney was stunning, like Amda was really moving. What Trent

0:16:41.047 --> 0:16:42.967
<v Speaker 1>Dalton said about the mums watching at.

0:16:42.807 --> 0:16:45.767
<v Speaker 6>Home, I just want to send a shout out to

0:16:45.967 --> 0:16:48.847
<v Speaker 6>all the mums who are a bit like Frankie Bell

0:16:49.287 --> 0:16:53.607
<v Speaker 6>and they're out in the suburbs tonight and they're feeling

0:16:53.607 --> 0:16:57.167
<v Speaker 6>a bit lost in the darkness, and I just want

0:16:57.207 --> 0:17:00.647
<v Speaker 6>to tell you, like, please believe me when I say

0:17:01.367 --> 0:17:04.447
<v Speaker 6>that when your children look at you in the darkness,

0:17:05.487 --> 0:17:07.207
<v Speaker 6>all they see is your light.

0:17:07.767 --> 0:17:09.927
<v Speaker 1>There was a lot of stuff that was just beautiful.

0:17:10.247 --> 0:17:12.647
<v Speaker 2>I cried all those things on the couch, so I'm

0:17:12.647 --> 0:17:14.527
<v Speaker 2>not at all surprised that you were a puddle. I

0:17:14.567 --> 0:17:17.327
<v Speaker 2>were like, they were really lovely. I wanted to ask you, though.

0:17:17.327 --> 0:17:19.927
<v Speaker 2>One thing I always wonder about the room is so

0:17:20.007 --> 0:17:23.167
<v Speaker 2>Sam Pang was the host, and he is quite roasty,

0:17:23.327 --> 0:17:25.007
<v Speaker 2>and this is the second year he's done it, which

0:17:25.047 --> 0:17:26.767
<v Speaker 2>means he must be good at it, right, because it's

0:17:27.207 --> 0:17:29.767
<v Speaker 2>hosting any awards show is the job that nobody wants,

0:17:29.767 --> 0:17:32.367
<v Speaker 2>apparently because you get so slammed for it. But he

0:17:32.407 --> 0:17:35.007
<v Speaker 2>gets up and he does the roasts in the room.

0:17:35.287 --> 0:17:36.167
<v Speaker 2>Does that go down?

0:17:36.207 --> 0:17:36.487
<v Speaker 1>Okay?

0:17:36.527 --> 0:17:38.607
<v Speaker 2>Because I've read commentary before that says one of the

0:17:38.647 --> 0:17:41.887
<v Speaker 2>reasons why awards show hosting is so hard is you've

0:17:41.927 --> 0:17:44.127
<v Speaker 2>got to offend all the people who are right there

0:17:44.167 --> 0:17:46.167
<v Speaker 2>to appease the people at home who want to feel

0:17:46.167 --> 0:17:47.207
<v Speaker 2>good about not being there.

0:17:47.247 --> 0:17:50.447
<v Speaker 1>That's so true. And he nailed it, and the room

0:17:50.567 --> 0:17:52.887
<v Speaker 1>laughed and they were with him, I think because his

0:17:53.087 --> 0:17:56.927
<v Speaker 1>jokes felt pointed, but they didn't feel mean, and so

0:17:57.047 --> 0:18:00.687
<v Speaker 1>the people that he was most funny about, like Andy

0:18:00.767 --> 0:18:03.487
<v Speaker 1>Lee making jokes about Habish and doctor Chris Brown making

0:18:03.567 --> 0:18:05.847
<v Speaker 1>jokes about Robert Owen getting his job and then being

0:18:05.887 --> 0:18:08.327
<v Speaker 1>nominated for Gold. A lot of them were his friends

0:18:08.887 --> 0:18:11.207
<v Speaker 1>and so they're fun. They're you know, comedians, a lot

0:18:11.207 --> 0:18:14.127
<v Speaker 1>of them. So I remember Asha said, oh, I feel

0:18:14.167 --> 0:18:16.007
<v Speaker 1>like Sam was too easy on me. That can't be

0:18:16.047 --> 0:18:17.887
<v Speaker 1>the end of it. You know, she didn't. He didn't

0:18:17.927 --> 0:18:20.887
<v Speaker 1>take me out, So I think it didn't ever feel

0:18:21.167 --> 0:18:22.927
<v Speaker 1>like he was punching down. It felt more like he

0:18:22.967 --> 0:18:25.287
<v Speaker 1>was punching up. He punched up at the networks a lot,

0:18:25.487 --> 0:18:28.807
<v Speaker 1>which everybody really laughed at the room was very much

0:18:28.807 --> 0:18:29.327
<v Speaker 1>with Sam.

0:18:29.487 --> 0:18:31.967
<v Speaker 5>We should probably ask as well, you were nominated, strife

0:18:31.967 --> 0:18:33.047
<v Speaker 5>was nominated.

0:18:32.607 --> 0:18:33.767
<v Speaker 1>We did not win.

0:18:34.087 --> 0:18:35.127
<v Speaker 3>Okay, you didn't win.

0:18:35.487 --> 0:18:38.927
<v Speaker 5>How do you feel about that? Because we are closet competitive?

0:18:39.087 --> 0:18:40.647
<v Speaker 5>But how did it feel to lose?

0:18:40.687 --> 0:18:43.367
<v Speaker 1>A LOGI it never feels good to lose anything. Like

0:18:43.407 --> 0:18:46.367
<v Speaker 1>everybody says they don't care until they win, and then

0:18:46.367 --> 0:18:48.567
<v Speaker 1>they care a lot. Yeah, Like that was what was

0:18:48.567 --> 0:18:50.407
<v Speaker 1>so lovely about when debraah Mammon got up and she

0:18:50.487 --> 0:18:53.647
<v Speaker 1>won Best Lead Actress in a Drama for Total Control

0:18:53.767 --> 0:18:55.927
<v Speaker 1>and that wasn't expected that she would win that, and

0:18:55.967 --> 0:18:58.767
<v Speaker 1>she got up and she just said, I really wanted this,

0:18:59.047 --> 0:19:02.607
<v Speaker 1>And everyone in the room really like laughed in a

0:19:02.647 --> 0:19:06.207
<v Speaker 1>sense of we get it because she said, what you

0:19:06.287 --> 0:19:08.087
<v Speaker 1>meant to be so cool and be like, oh, I

0:19:08.247 --> 0:19:10.967
<v Speaker 1>was fine, it's whatever. But everybody in the room really

0:19:10.967 --> 0:19:11.447
<v Speaker 1>wants to win.

0:19:11.527 --> 0:19:12.647
<v Speaker 3>Like everybody wants to win.

0:19:12.687 --> 0:19:13.527
<v Speaker 1>Who doesn't want to win?

0:19:13.807 --> 0:19:17.167
<v Speaker 5>I am incredibly competitive. But when I saw that we

0:19:17.167 --> 0:19:20.007
<v Speaker 5>were beaten by Utopia, I could sleep. I could sleep

0:19:20.007 --> 0:19:22.367
<v Speaker 5>at night. Yes, I do love Utopia. I think it's

0:19:22.367 --> 0:19:25.847
<v Speaker 5>a great show. We're going to be beaten Utopia, I accept.

0:19:26.007 --> 0:19:28.327
<v Speaker 1>And that was their last season, so and we were

0:19:28.367 --> 0:19:30.567
<v Speaker 1>also saying, look, it was our first season of strife

0:19:30.727 --> 0:19:32.567
<v Speaker 1>in the starting to in the middle of making our

0:19:32.607 --> 0:19:36.087
<v Speaker 1>second season. Maybe by the time we've got third or

0:19:36.087 --> 0:19:38.887
<v Speaker 1>fourth or fifth or sixth seasons, sometimes it takes a

0:19:38.927 --> 0:19:40.407
<v Speaker 1>while to gain that momentum.

0:19:40.447 --> 0:19:42.287
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's the first time it's occurred to me that

0:19:42.327 --> 0:19:44.327
<v Speaker 2>you're going to have to go to the logis every year.

0:19:46.287 --> 0:19:48.567
<v Speaker 1>That hasn't occurred to me that as long as we're nominated.

0:19:49.087 --> 0:19:52.167
<v Speaker 2>Okay, out louders, if you've got more questions for Mia

0:19:52.207 --> 0:19:55.087
<v Speaker 2>about her big night at the Logis or anything Logis related.

0:19:55.527 --> 0:19:57.607
<v Speaker 2>Jump in the Outlauders Facebook group and ask them now,

0:19:57.647 --> 0:20:00.647
<v Speaker 2>because we're going to be recording a special subscribers episode

0:20:00.727 --> 0:20:03.407
<v Speaker 2>all about the Logis for those who still haven't got

0:20:03.487 --> 0:20:06.367
<v Speaker 2>enough of me A's debilitating wardrobe.

0:20:06.407 --> 0:20:09.167
<v Speaker 3>My time going to be this Guss. If you want goss,

0:20:09.327 --> 0:20:10.007
<v Speaker 3>That's what I'm.

0:20:09.927 --> 0:20:11.207
<v Speaker 5>Going to be asking about. I need to know who

0:20:11.247 --> 0:20:13.567
<v Speaker 5>you talk to, I need to know precisely what you ate.

0:20:13.687 --> 0:20:14.847
<v Speaker 5>And the other thing is the.

0:20:14.807 --> 0:20:18.887
<v Speaker 1>Poet doing drugs in the toilet.

0:20:19.047 --> 0:20:20.687
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, you're going to be telling us about that in

0:20:20.727 --> 0:20:28.007
<v Speaker 5>tomorrow subscriber episode.

0:20:28.647 --> 0:20:30.287
<v Speaker 1>In the same way that the Internet has a new

0:20:30.367 --> 0:20:32.807
<v Speaker 1>joke every week, as we discussed at the top of

0:20:32.847 --> 0:20:35.567
<v Speaker 1>the show, it can also feel like every week the

0:20:35.647 --> 0:20:40.047
<v Speaker 1>Internet chooses someone, almost always a woman to pylon, and

0:20:40.087 --> 0:20:43.607
<v Speaker 1>the force of that can totally dominate the culture, well,

0:20:43.687 --> 0:20:46.367
<v Speaker 1>certainly the media and social media. A few weeks ago

0:20:46.407 --> 0:20:48.607
<v Speaker 1>it was j Loo, and last week it was Raygun,

0:20:48.687 --> 0:20:51.407
<v Speaker 1>and this week it's Blake Lively, who has a new

0:20:51.447 --> 0:20:53.807
<v Speaker 1>movie out called It Ends with Us that we spoke

0:20:53.847 --> 0:20:57.127
<v Speaker 1>about on last week's show. And in the same way

0:20:57.127 --> 0:21:00.567
<v Speaker 1>that the demure jokes and means can be really hard

0:21:00.567 --> 0:21:03.167
<v Speaker 1>to understand. It can also be hard to understand the

0:21:03.247 --> 0:21:07.287
<v Speaker 1>source of the intense hatred and criticism that engulfs these

0:21:07.327 --> 0:21:09.727
<v Speaker 1>people at the center of these storms. You can find

0:21:09.727 --> 0:21:13.527
<v Speaker 1>yourself wondering, but what actually did she do? Because there

0:21:13.567 --> 0:21:17.207
<v Speaker 1>is so much noise that the storm itself becomes the story.

0:21:17.327 --> 0:21:20.487
<v Speaker 1>And so it is with Blake Lively. This week you

0:21:20.567 --> 0:21:23.527
<v Speaker 1>may have seen her being roasted everywhere, but particularly on

0:21:23.647 --> 0:21:25.927
<v Speaker 1>social media, where she is the villain of the week

0:21:26.487 --> 0:21:29.767
<v Speaker 1>in a huge way. Now, it's important to note that

0:21:29.807 --> 0:21:32.487
<v Speaker 1>we don't like to participate in these pylons or in

0:21:32.567 --> 0:21:35.807
<v Speaker 1>cancel culture, but what we do do on this show

0:21:35.927 --> 0:21:38.487
<v Speaker 1>is to try and get some perspective about what's really

0:21:38.527 --> 0:21:40.807
<v Speaker 1>going on so that we can understand the biggest issue,

0:21:41.207 --> 0:21:45.207
<v Speaker 1>why are people so mad with Blake Lively. So the

0:21:45.247 --> 0:21:48.647
<v Speaker 1>criticism initially came with some drama between Lively and the

0:21:48.647 --> 0:21:52.607
<v Speaker 1>director and co star Justin Baldoni of this movie, but

0:21:52.687 --> 0:21:55.207
<v Speaker 1>since we last discussed it, the tide has seemed to

0:21:55.247 --> 0:21:59.767
<v Speaker 1>turn from criticism for the film's marketing and potentially of

0:21:59.887 --> 0:22:04.647
<v Speaker 1>Justin Baldoni, to a direct attack on Blake. The film

0:22:04.647 --> 0:22:07.727
<v Speaker 1>has so far brought in one hundred million dollars US

0:22:08.007 --> 0:22:10.847
<v Speaker 1>around the world, so people are going to see it,

0:22:11.487 --> 0:22:15.527
<v Speaker 1>and Justin Baldoni has reportedly hired a crisis pr manager.

0:22:16.087 --> 0:22:19.967
<v Speaker 1>Now this bit is important, Melissa Nathan, who specializes in

0:22:20.007 --> 0:22:25.407
<v Speaker 1>publicity and reputation management. She previously represented Johnny Depp during

0:22:25.487 --> 0:22:29.487
<v Speaker 1>the Amber Herd trial, and the shift in the perception

0:22:29.567 --> 0:22:33.887
<v Speaker 1>of Blake Lively has really turned the algorithm on TikTok

0:22:34.047 --> 0:22:39.007
<v Speaker 1>and another social media against her. The criticism is directed

0:22:39.047 --> 0:22:41.527
<v Speaker 1>at the way she's chosen to market the film, people

0:22:41.567 --> 0:22:44.487
<v Speaker 1>saying she's been too glib and chatty, and her outfits

0:22:44.487 --> 0:22:46.407
<v Speaker 1>have been too cheery given that the theme of the

0:22:46.407 --> 0:22:50.927
<v Speaker 1>film is about domestic violence. And then over the weekend, mysteriously,

0:22:51.407 --> 0:22:57.407
<v Speaker 1>seemingly randomly, an interview from twenty sixteen resurfaced by a

0:22:57.767 --> 0:23:01.327
<v Speaker 1>journalist who said it was the interview that made her

0:23:01.487 --> 0:23:04.327
<v Speaker 1>want to quit her job. Here's a little bit of

0:23:04.407 --> 0:23:05.127
<v Speaker 1>that interview.

0:23:05.407 --> 0:23:08.807
<v Speaker 3>First of all, congrats on your little bomb. Congrats on

0:23:08.847 --> 0:23:11.567
<v Speaker 3>your little What about my bum.

0:23:14.047 --> 0:23:18.087
<v Speaker 7>We've got two nice ones and they are kind of bumps.

0:23:18.367 --> 0:23:21.967
<v Speaker 7>They no not bumps. The Lovely Lady lumps.

0:23:22.047 --> 0:23:25.087
<v Speaker 5>To context for that interview is that Blake Lively had

0:23:25.127 --> 0:23:29.007
<v Speaker 5>publicly announced her pregnancy beforehand, and when she sat down,

0:23:29.047 --> 0:23:32.647
<v Speaker 5>the interviewer said congratulations, and then she said congratulations on

0:23:32.687 --> 0:23:37.167
<v Speaker 5>your bump. To clarify the interviewer was not pregnant. It

0:23:37.287 --> 0:23:40.847
<v Speaker 5>was a strange way to react. And then the interviewer

0:23:40.887 --> 0:23:45.167
<v Speaker 5>asked a question about costuming and what they wore, and

0:23:45.207 --> 0:23:47.687
<v Speaker 5>Blake sort of said, oh, would you ask a man

0:23:47.767 --> 0:23:50.167
<v Speaker 5>what he wore. There was something quite off in the

0:23:50.247 --> 0:23:53.847
<v Speaker 5>dynamics of the interview, and even I thought Posey Parker,

0:23:53.887 --> 0:23:57.967
<v Speaker 5>who was beside her, was doing her best to try

0:23:58.007 --> 0:24:02.927
<v Speaker 5>and keep all parties happy. That interview is uncomfortable.

0:24:03.047 --> 0:24:06.807
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's cringe to watch, but often those junkets, press

0:24:06.847 --> 0:24:10.767
<v Speaker 1>junkets can be really awkward because because the stars are exhausted,

0:24:10.807 --> 0:24:13.287
<v Speaker 1>they're they're having to see maybe fifty people in a

0:24:13.367 --> 0:24:15.687
<v Speaker 1>day from all around the world an answer the same questions.

0:24:16.047 --> 0:24:18.967
<v Speaker 1>So clearly she was she was over it. I agree,

0:24:18.967 --> 0:24:22.447
<v Speaker 1>and she was a bit snarky, but you know, yeah.

0:24:22.047 --> 0:24:25.007
<v Speaker 5>And look, I see both sides, right, because yes, you

0:24:25.087 --> 0:24:26.927
<v Speaker 5>have to sit there and rumin answer questions about the

0:24:26.927 --> 0:24:29.007
<v Speaker 5>film you made to fifty people. I would hate to

0:24:29.047 --> 0:24:31.887
<v Speaker 5>do it. It's not that hard to be polite like,

0:24:32.007 --> 0:24:33.647
<v Speaker 5>that's part of the job, right, You get paid a

0:24:33.687 --> 0:24:36.807
<v Speaker 5>lot of money to be nice to people on camera.

0:24:36.887 --> 0:24:39.167
<v Speaker 5>There's a camera there, so I agree with that.

0:24:39.207 --> 0:24:41.167
<v Speaker 1>But at the same time, that woman saying this made

0:24:41.207 --> 0:24:42.727
<v Speaker 1>me want to quit my job, like that was just

0:24:42.767 --> 0:24:49.287
<v Speaker 1>a shameless grab for relevance and attention and follows.

0:24:49.447 --> 0:24:52.647
<v Speaker 5>Initially I thought when this video was published and it

0:24:52.687 --> 0:24:54.567
<v Speaker 5>started doing the rounds on YouTube, and then it got

0:24:54.607 --> 0:24:58.247
<v Speaker 5>picked up on TikTok very quickly, I thought, oh, this

0:24:58.287 --> 0:24:59.487
<v Speaker 5>is a Dustin Baldoni move.

0:24:59.567 --> 0:25:00.807
<v Speaker 3>This has been from camp.

0:25:01.007 --> 0:25:06.087
<v Speaker 5>This PR team has gone through the archives and unearthed it.

0:25:06.487 --> 0:25:08.687
<v Speaker 5>And then I actually listened to an interview with the

0:25:08.767 --> 0:25:11.807
<v Speaker 5>journalist who said, that's not what happened. She had seen

0:25:11.847 --> 0:25:13.647
<v Speaker 5>a bit of commentary about that it ends with us

0:25:13.767 --> 0:25:16.647
<v Speaker 5>pressed to her, and she thought, I'm going to share

0:25:16.647 --> 0:25:18.687
<v Speaker 5>this interview I did with Blake Lively. So it seems

0:25:18.727 --> 0:25:21.247
<v Speaker 5>it was organically shared by the journalists who had never

0:25:21.247 --> 0:25:22.087
<v Speaker 5>published it before.

0:25:22.167 --> 0:25:25.767
<v Speaker 2>Well, and also, when you're a journalist and you interview

0:25:25.887 --> 0:25:30.127
<v Speaker 2>famous people, and sometimes those famous people, it doesn't go

0:25:30.247 --> 0:25:32.567
<v Speaker 2>exactly how it did in your head, which is she's

0:25:32.607 --> 0:25:35.247
<v Speaker 2>gonna love me and it's going to be great and

0:25:35.287 --> 0:25:36.967
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to make this joke and she's going to

0:25:37.047 --> 0:25:39.487
<v Speaker 2>laugh so hard. Like a lot of journalists, most of

0:25:39.567 --> 0:25:42.447
<v Speaker 2>us actually have a story like that where the connection

0:25:42.727 --> 0:25:45.807
<v Speaker 2>was somehow disjointed for all the reasons that Mia said before,

0:25:46.207 --> 0:25:49.487
<v Speaker 2>but also they just weren't up for playing that gag

0:25:49.567 --> 0:25:52.487
<v Speaker 2>a million times. And clearly it seems in that instance

0:25:53.007 --> 0:25:56.487
<v Speaker 2>Blake Lively was very and she's always been very boundaried

0:25:56.527 --> 0:25:59.847
<v Speaker 2>about talking about her private life, and clearly she was like,

0:25:59.887 --> 0:26:01.327
<v Speaker 2>I don't want to talk about bumps. I don't want

0:26:01.327 --> 0:26:03.327
<v Speaker 2>to talk about fashion. She was like in one of

0:26:03.367 --> 0:26:06.607
<v Speaker 2>those take me seriously moods, and it came across very

0:26:06.607 --> 0:26:08.967
<v Speaker 2>strongly right. And if I was the journal I know

0:26:09.367 --> 0:26:11.687
<v Speaker 2>knows who've held grudges against celebrities who are route to

0:26:11.727 --> 0:26:14.047
<v Speaker 2>them in interviews. Yeah, I'm not saying that that's a

0:26:14.087 --> 0:26:17.007
<v Speaker 2>professional way for the journalists to behave either. This is

0:26:17.047 --> 0:26:19.287
<v Speaker 2>the moment to unveil that interview if you've got it

0:26:19.327 --> 0:26:20.367
<v Speaker 2>in your pocket.

0:26:20.207 --> 0:26:21.127
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, exactly.

0:26:21.167 --> 0:26:24.287
<v Speaker 5>And that's the thing is that this interview resurfaced, but

0:26:24.407 --> 0:26:27.207
<v Speaker 5>so have a lot of interviews, interviews where she is

0:26:27.247 --> 0:26:31.407
<v Speaker 5>sitting beside America Ferrera, who eye rolls when she's giving an.

0:26:31.287 --> 0:26:34.887
<v Speaker 1>Answer America Ferrera, I rolls at Blake, Yes, in an interview.

0:26:35.047 --> 0:26:36.727
<v Speaker 1>Sorry I didn't understand.

0:26:36.847 --> 0:26:39.327
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, So there's a viral moment that you know was

0:26:39.647 --> 0:26:41.847
<v Speaker 5>like I reckon ten years ago. It was a sisterhood

0:26:41.847 --> 0:26:42.527
<v Speaker 5>of the Traveling Path.

0:26:42.647 --> 0:26:45.327
<v Speaker 1>But Jesse, I need you to explain to me what's

0:26:45.367 --> 0:26:49.367
<v Speaker 1>the They're there? Okay, like what did Blake do? The

0:26:49.487 --> 0:26:50.447
<v Speaker 1>villain of the internet.

0:26:50.487 --> 0:26:53.647
<v Speaker 5>All right, here's where it started. So we knew that

0:26:53.687 --> 0:26:56.087
<v Speaker 5>there was tension between her and Justin Baldoni, which we

0:26:56.087 --> 0:27:00.287
<v Speaker 5>talked about last week. People are seeing clips on TikTok

0:27:00.407 --> 0:27:03.767
<v Speaker 5>where she's talking about where your florals, Grab a girlfriend,

0:27:03.807 --> 0:27:07.727
<v Speaker 5>go and see this movie, and people are angry because

0:27:07.727 --> 0:27:11.247
<v Speaker 5>they're going, this is about domestic violence, which Justin Baldoni

0:27:11.287 --> 0:27:13.127
<v Speaker 5>is making a point of every time he talks about it.

0:27:13.247 --> 0:27:16.087
<v Speaker 5>He talks about domestic violence. So people are going, Blake

0:27:16.127 --> 0:27:18.647
<v Speaker 5>Lively is really undermining the themes of the movie, and

0:27:18.647 --> 0:27:21.847
<v Speaker 5>she's trying to sell her haircare brand and blah blah blah.

0:27:22.207 --> 0:27:25.007
<v Speaker 5>When this comes up, it has started to feed a

0:27:25.127 --> 0:27:28.167
<v Speaker 5>narrative that Blake Lively is a mean girl. That's what

0:27:28.207 --> 0:27:32.127
<v Speaker 5>they've decided, and even Blake Lively not talking about the

0:27:32.167 --> 0:27:37.007
<v Speaker 5>domestic violence themes has become a bit of a trend

0:27:37.167 --> 0:27:40.247
<v Speaker 5>or a myth being perpetuated around the Internet. There was

0:27:40.287 --> 0:27:42.807
<v Speaker 5>something that Vox a quote I read in a Vox

0:27:42.887 --> 0:27:46.367
<v Speaker 5>article that said, while tabloids like TMZ are reporting on

0:27:46.407 --> 0:27:49.247
<v Speaker 5>a behind the scenes pr war between Lively and Baldoni,

0:27:49.727 --> 0:27:52.487
<v Speaker 5>this part of the backlash, what we're talking about comes

0:27:52.487 --> 0:27:56.007
<v Speaker 5>from Lively, all on her own, answering these questions the

0:27:56.047 --> 0:28:00.007
<v Speaker 5>way she's chosen to. I could not disagree more. Because

0:28:00.447 --> 0:28:05.247
<v Speaker 5>they will cut an interview that's fifteen minutes. They will

0:28:05.287 --> 0:28:10.327
<v Speaker 5>cut thirty two seconds where she says something that looks

0:28:10.447 --> 0:28:13.167
<v Speaker 5>insensitive or silly and post it and be like, look,

0:28:13.207 --> 0:28:15.847
<v Speaker 5>she's not talking about domestic violence. Well, actually, if you

0:28:16.207 --> 0:28:19.327
<v Speaker 5>were to extend that clip out, she does answer the question, and.

0:28:19.367 --> 0:28:23.207
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about how the internet economy works. The people

0:28:23.287 --> 0:28:27.167
<v Speaker 1>who are cutting those clips for their media companies or

0:28:27.167 --> 0:28:29.167
<v Speaker 1>for their you know, the people who are doing the interviews.

0:28:29.647 --> 0:28:31.847
<v Speaker 1>Guess what, if you get to talk to someone for

0:28:32.007 --> 0:28:34.927
<v Speaker 1>three minutes, the bit that you're going to cut and

0:28:35.087 --> 0:28:37.127
<v Speaker 1>use is the bit where she talks about having just

0:28:37.167 --> 0:28:41.047
<v Speaker 1>had a baby, or about her husband, or about something

0:28:41.047 --> 0:28:45.487
<v Speaker 1>that is not domestic violence because it is more marketable

0:28:45.567 --> 0:28:47.287
<v Speaker 1>and more people will click on it. That is not

0:28:47.407 --> 0:28:48.127
<v Speaker 1>her fault.

0:28:48.607 --> 0:28:52.247
<v Speaker 5>And now it's like we've written this story, so we're

0:28:52.287 --> 0:28:55.687
<v Speaker 5>looking for evidence to perpetuate the story. And what we

0:28:55.887 --> 0:29:00.087
<v Speaker 5>do when we cancel people, we do it broadly, but

0:29:00.207 --> 0:29:02.287
<v Speaker 5>we do it in a very specific way to women

0:29:02.967 --> 0:29:06.807
<v Speaker 5>is then we start to dig. And the dig has begun.

0:29:07.167 --> 0:29:11.327
<v Speaker 5>So the dig is about how Ryan Reynolds allegedly cheated

0:29:11.367 --> 0:29:15.367
<v Speaker 5>on Scarlet your Hansen with Blake Lively. We are talking

0:29:15.407 --> 0:29:18.567
<v Speaker 5>again about their twenty twelve wedding, which was twelve years ago,

0:29:18.887 --> 0:29:22.487
<v Speaker 5>which was on a plantation, and so Blake Lively also racist.

0:29:22.847 --> 0:29:25.047
<v Speaker 5>The part of the story that they're not talking about

0:29:25.247 --> 0:29:28.287
<v Speaker 5>is that they didn't know. They came out and apologized,

0:29:28.327 --> 0:29:31.687
<v Speaker 5>they donated thousands of dollars to Black Lives Matter, and

0:29:31.687 --> 0:29:33.047
<v Speaker 5>then they got remarried because they.

0:29:32.967 --> 0:29:33.847
<v Speaker 3>Were so horrified.

0:29:34.527 --> 0:29:37.807
<v Speaker 5>So they're going through now and finding every bit of

0:29:37.807 --> 0:29:41.447
<v Speaker 5>evidence they can that Blake Lively is the devil, and

0:29:41.527 --> 0:29:45.727
<v Speaker 5>the TikTok algorithm is just getting very excited about that.

0:29:45.967 --> 0:29:47.687
<v Speaker 5>Claire and I are doing a bit of work on

0:29:47.727 --> 0:29:50.607
<v Speaker 5>TikTok at the moment around Canceled the other podcast we do,

0:29:51.167 --> 0:29:54.207
<v Speaker 5>and we've done an episode on Blake, an episode on Ryan.

0:29:54.167 --> 0:29:57.847
<v Speaker 1>And explain that Canceled is a comedy podcast, so you're

0:29:57.887 --> 0:29:58.927
<v Speaker 1>not actually canceling.

0:29:59.247 --> 0:30:02.327
<v Speaker 5>No, it's a comedy podcast. The whole reason we started

0:30:02.327 --> 0:30:04.407
<v Speaker 5>it is for moments like these, because it's.

0:30:04.287 --> 0:30:07.127
<v Speaker 1>Satirical about how insane this situation.

0:30:06.807 --> 0:30:09.527
<v Speaker 5>Is and how seriously we take it, and how now,

0:30:09.847 --> 0:30:11.607
<v Speaker 5>for any other crime, you sit there, you get a

0:30:11.647 --> 0:30:13.687
<v Speaker 5>charge and a sentence and we move on with our lives.

0:30:14.047 --> 0:30:15.927
<v Speaker 3>But for Blake Lively, we.

0:30:16.047 --> 0:30:18.527
<v Speaker 5>Just throw and throw and throw, when if you look

0:30:18.567 --> 0:30:22.447
<v Speaker 5>at it, the no they're there thing is what exactly

0:30:22.487 --> 0:30:24.967
<v Speaker 5>are we accusing her off? And that's what the podcast

0:30:24.967 --> 0:30:27.847
<v Speaker 5>tries to do. On TikTok, where you know, doing a

0:30:27.847 --> 0:30:32.847
<v Speaker 5>few videos, and we noticed that if we blatantly defend

0:30:33.087 --> 0:30:37.887
<v Speaker 5>Blake Lively, which is our general position, the reach on

0:30:37.967 --> 0:30:41.527
<v Speaker 5>those videos is minuscule, right, even if there's engagement, it's

0:30:41.527 --> 0:30:44.007
<v Speaker 5>like the reach is being limited. Then there was one

0:30:44.087 --> 0:30:46.487
<v Speaker 5>video that went off about Blake Lively, and when I

0:30:46.527 --> 0:30:49.607
<v Speaker 5>had a look at how we'd sold it, I went, Oh,

0:30:50.287 --> 0:30:53.247
<v Speaker 5>if I was the algorithm, I would probably think that

0:30:53.287 --> 0:30:54.887
<v Speaker 5>we were going to add a little bit of fuel

0:30:54.927 --> 0:30:57.407
<v Speaker 5>to the fire. Now, there are a few things going on.

0:30:57.607 --> 0:31:01.487
<v Speaker 5>The first is that it's a self fulfilling prophecy. People

0:31:01.527 --> 0:31:05.607
<v Speaker 5>want bad things about Blake. I also think something is

0:31:05.647 --> 0:31:08.967
<v Speaker 5>happening with TikTok. You spoke before about Justin Baldoni and

0:31:09.287 --> 0:31:14.047
<v Speaker 5>he's pr Crisis team who won the Johnny Depp amber

0:31:14.087 --> 0:31:18.647
<v Speaker 5>Herd trial. Holly you recently recommended who trolled Amber, which

0:31:18.887 --> 0:31:22.167
<v Speaker 5>looked at how you can basically get bots to win

0:31:22.847 --> 0:31:27.127
<v Speaker 5>your affection in the public narrative. Something is going on here.

0:31:27.247 --> 0:31:28.487
<v Speaker 5>I feel that very strongly.

0:31:28.687 --> 0:31:31.647
<v Speaker 2>I also just think, though we all need the perspective

0:31:31.807 --> 0:31:35.447
<v Speaker 2>that this movie is a big success. It was an

0:31:35.447 --> 0:31:37.967
<v Speaker 2>indie movie that didn't cost very much money to make.

0:31:38.687 --> 0:31:41.967
<v Speaker 2>Everybody is going to see it. All of this attention

0:31:42.127 --> 0:31:44.887
<v Speaker 2>is also making more and more people see it. And

0:31:45.287 --> 0:31:47.527
<v Speaker 2>the thing that's interesting to me is that all of

0:31:47.527 --> 0:31:49.607
<v Speaker 2>this Blake Lively stuff comes down to something that we

0:31:49.647 --> 0:31:52.367
<v Speaker 2>talk about all the time, which is successful woman and

0:31:52.447 --> 0:31:56.167
<v Speaker 2>having a very successful moment. She must be awful, she

0:31:56.247 --> 0:31:58.807
<v Speaker 2>must be a terrible person, she must not be likable,

0:31:59.247 --> 0:32:02.127
<v Speaker 2>and they're digging up everything that makes her seem like

0:32:02.167 --> 0:32:04.247
<v Speaker 2>a bit of a bitch. Basically so that then everyone

0:32:04.247 --> 0:32:06.887
<v Speaker 2>can go Blake Lively bit of a bitch and clearly

0:32:06.927 --> 0:32:10.327
<v Speaker 2>doesn't like women because she doesn't really care about domestic violence,

0:32:11.007 --> 0:32:16.447
<v Speaker 2>and all of those things are so subjective and so nonsense. Also,

0:32:16.527 --> 0:32:20.287
<v Speaker 2>the idea that Blake Lively and Blake Lively alone decided

0:32:20.327 --> 0:32:22.967
<v Speaker 2>how this movie was going to be marketed is so

0:32:23.287 --> 0:32:26.047
<v Speaker 2>stupid that I can't bear it. Yes, of course she

0:32:26.087 --> 0:32:28.247
<v Speaker 2>has a lot of power. She does because she's got

0:32:28.247 --> 0:32:31.007
<v Speaker 2>a producer credit, She's married to one of Hollywood's most

0:32:31.007 --> 0:32:34.047
<v Speaker 2>powerful men, no questions, She's got loads of power. But

0:32:34.247 --> 0:32:37.047
<v Speaker 2>this is not the first film that is about a

0:32:37.167 --> 0:32:40.367
<v Speaker 2>serious topic that has been marketed in a frivolous way.

0:32:40.487 --> 0:32:45.247
<v Speaker 2>It happens all the time, and it particularly happens when

0:32:45.247 --> 0:32:49.047
<v Speaker 2>you are talking about violence against women. It's interesting because

0:32:49.927 --> 0:32:52.607
<v Speaker 2>Colleen Hoover so who wrote these books, and they are

0:32:52.767 --> 0:32:55.207
<v Speaker 2>enormously successful. We touched on this last week, but not

0:32:55.327 --> 0:32:59.527
<v Speaker 2>just a little bit successful, like world headlines successful. She

0:32:59.607 --> 0:33:01.607
<v Speaker 2>is one of the best selling authors in the world.

0:33:01.647 --> 0:33:05.007
<v Speaker 2>So everybody knows what this book is about, right because

0:33:05.007 --> 0:33:08.247
<v Speaker 2>twenty million people have read it. And she also marketed

0:33:08.287 --> 0:33:10.727
<v Speaker 2>the books with pretty flowers on the cover and in

0:33:10.727 --> 0:33:13.687
<v Speaker 2>a particular way. And I spoke a couple of years

0:33:13.687 --> 0:33:16.647
<v Speaker 2>ago about how the last book that I wrote, which

0:33:16.687 --> 0:33:19.727
<v Speaker 2>is termed commercial women's fiction, which is what Colleen Hoover

0:33:19.847 --> 0:33:23.207
<v Speaker 2>is certainly termed as is generally seen to be frivolous

0:33:23.247 --> 0:33:26.047
<v Speaker 2>and silly and you've got to put stripes or flowers

0:33:26.087 --> 0:33:29.167
<v Speaker 2>or pink on the cover, but actually very often deal

0:33:29.207 --> 0:33:31.967
<v Speaker 2>with serious, gritty things that are part of women's lives,

0:33:32.727 --> 0:33:36.287
<v Speaker 2>are always sneered at and always looked down upon when

0:33:36.367 --> 0:33:38.927
<v Speaker 2>actually women love them, like the women who are flocking

0:33:38.927 --> 0:33:41.727
<v Speaker 2>to see this film and the women who read Colleen

0:33:41.767 --> 0:33:45.127
<v Speaker 2>Hoover books. You know, there's snobby attitudes about those books.

0:33:45.487 --> 0:33:47.247
<v Speaker 2>And I want to be really clear that I haven't

0:33:47.247 --> 0:33:49.087
<v Speaker 2>read them, because when we talked about it last time,

0:33:49.127 --> 0:33:51.287
<v Speaker 2>a couple of people said, oh, Holly sounded snooty about

0:33:51.287 --> 0:33:54.687
<v Speaker 2>those books. I haven't read them. But people who are

0:33:54.767 --> 0:33:59.087
<v Speaker 2>very serious about literature in inverted commas look down enormously

0:33:59.127 --> 0:34:01.567
<v Speaker 2>on the Colleen Hoovers of the world because she started

0:34:01.607 --> 0:34:04.927
<v Speaker 2>off self published. She writes books about women's lives that

0:34:04.967 --> 0:34:07.447
<v Speaker 2>women want to read, but she doesn't come from a

0:34:07.567 --> 0:34:11.087
<v Speaker 2>storied literary background. It annoys a lot of people. It

0:34:11.167 --> 0:34:13.727
<v Speaker 2>probably also annoys a lot of people that this movie

0:34:14.047 --> 0:34:17.327
<v Speaker 2>that you know, a powerful woman has helped promote and

0:34:17.407 --> 0:34:20.567
<v Speaker 2>make is doing really well. And I just think we

0:34:20.647 --> 0:34:24.647
<v Speaker 2>need to really examine what we're being sold here. If

0:34:24.687 --> 0:34:25.687
<v Speaker 2>you want to go and see.

0:34:25.567 --> 0:34:27.407
<v Speaker 3>This movie, who cares.

0:34:27.127 --> 0:34:30.167
<v Speaker 2>Whether Blake Lively sometimes is in a bad mood, rolls

0:34:30.167 --> 0:34:32.807
<v Speaker 2>her eyes like have you never been in a bad mood?

0:34:32.807 --> 0:34:35.967
<v Speaker 2>And rolls her eyes like are we what is this about?

0:34:36.167 --> 0:34:39.767
<v Speaker 5>Well, that's a great irony, right is it? Yes, people

0:34:39.807 --> 0:34:41.047
<v Speaker 5>are going to see it, and it's making a lot

0:34:41.087 --> 0:34:43.167
<v Speaker 5>of money, so you go is a success? Who even

0:34:43.207 --> 0:34:45.847
<v Speaker 5>cares about the backlash if people go and see a

0:34:45.887 --> 0:34:49.927
<v Speaker 5>movie that's about domestic violence and about gendered relationships and

0:34:50.047 --> 0:34:53.487
<v Speaker 5>power in those dynamics and they walk out of that

0:34:53.527 --> 0:34:56.407
<v Speaker 5>film going I liked the film, but Blake Lively is

0:34:56.447 --> 0:35:00.287
<v Speaker 5>a bitch. There's a great irony there, which is that

0:35:00.807 --> 0:35:05.647
<v Speaker 5>we are still perpetuating this hatred of women, and we

0:35:05.727 --> 0:35:08.847
<v Speaker 5>can't see that that's a problem. The way that I've

0:35:08.887 --> 0:35:13.167
<v Speaker 5>seen TikTok in particular interpret this is that everything bad

0:35:13.167 --> 0:35:15.687
<v Speaker 5>about this project is the fault of the women. So

0:35:15.807 --> 0:35:19.487
<v Speaker 5>Colleen Hoover in Perfect Story, Blake Lively in perfect marketing,

0:35:19.967 --> 0:35:23.567
<v Speaker 5>and anything good about the film is the work of

0:35:23.647 --> 0:35:28.127
<v Speaker 5>the man. And if you can't see that entrenched within

0:35:28.287 --> 0:35:32.927
<v Speaker 5>that is misogyny, which is the same route that perpetuates

0:35:32.967 --> 0:35:36.447
<v Speaker 5>domestic violence. I think you're missing something. And that's not

0:35:36.487 --> 0:35:38.367
<v Speaker 5>to say that Blake Lively is perfect or that she

0:35:38.487 --> 0:35:40.687
<v Speaker 5>doesn't want criticism. I'm sure that she does.

0:35:40.647 --> 0:35:44.207
<v Speaker 1>But not like this, the volume compared to the crime.

0:35:45.207 --> 0:35:50.967
<v Speaker 1>And I say crime like rolling my eyes, because everybody's

0:35:51.007 --> 0:35:53.007
<v Speaker 1>just looking to hate. And you know, I even read

0:35:53.007 --> 0:35:55.447
<v Speaker 1>a quote that someone had said in one of these interviews,

0:35:55.487 --> 0:35:58.047
<v Speaker 1>if you have a message for victims of domestic violence,

0:35:58.447 --> 0:36:00.367
<v Speaker 1>what would it be? And she said, you should just

0:36:00.447 --> 0:36:04.007
<v Speaker 1>know that you are not defined by what's happened to you.

0:36:04.007 --> 0:36:08.807
<v Speaker 1>You are more than your worst experience, which is something

0:36:08.847 --> 0:36:13.327
<v Speaker 1>that's fairly anadyne to say and is lovely and seemingly inoffensive.

0:36:13.927 --> 0:36:17.287
<v Speaker 1>It's spun into oh, she doesn't care and she doesn't understand,

0:36:17.367 --> 0:36:22.127
<v Speaker 1>and it's just like everyone's just looking to pile on.

0:36:22.367 --> 0:36:25.287
<v Speaker 1>And it's what you say, Jesse. I can't think of

0:36:25.967 --> 0:36:28.447
<v Speaker 1>a time recently when it's been a man like you.

0:36:28.487 --> 0:36:31.807
<v Speaker 1>Look at j Lo, it was similar, you know, whether

0:36:31.847 --> 0:36:34.247
<v Speaker 1>it's Meghan, and perhaps we're also guilty of it on

0:36:34.287 --> 0:36:39.327
<v Speaker 1>this show. It's about Meghan, not Harry, Jlo, not Ben.

0:36:39.487 --> 0:36:41.647
<v Speaker 1>And it's funny. I was thinking at the logis last

0:36:41.727 --> 0:36:46.127
<v Speaker 1>night when Larry Emda won. The men always win and

0:36:46.167 --> 0:36:51.287
<v Speaker 1>are nominated. Carl won gold, Lisa was never not even nominated.

0:36:51.847 --> 0:36:54.807
<v Speaker 1>Larry one gold. Kyler Gillies, who he also sits next

0:36:54.847 --> 0:36:57.367
<v Speaker 1>to you on the couch every single day, you know,

0:36:57.487 --> 0:36:58.527
<v Speaker 1>is not even nominated.

0:36:58.647 --> 0:37:00.367
<v Speaker 2>We do have to look at ourselves about this a

0:37:00.367 --> 0:37:02.247
<v Speaker 2>little bit. I know that you'll tell me I'm finger

0:37:02.287 --> 0:37:05.567
<v Speaker 2>wagging mere and you're probably right, But why can't we

0:37:05.647 --> 0:37:08.767
<v Speaker 2>watch a woman she's having a big pr moment because

0:37:08.767 --> 0:37:11.407
<v Speaker 2>she's got some big to sell. For nine of the

0:37:11.487 --> 0:37:13.487
<v Speaker 2>last ten years, you wouldn't have heard from Blake Lively.

0:37:13.607 --> 0:37:16.167
<v Speaker 2>You know, she's off doing her stuff. She's out there,

0:37:16.207 --> 0:37:19.327
<v Speaker 2>putting herself out there to sell something that she believes in.

0:37:19.647 --> 0:37:21.807
<v Speaker 2>And all any of us want to do is scratch

0:37:21.807 --> 0:37:23.727
<v Speaker 2>away at the surface. There must be something wrong here,

0:37:23.767 --> 0:37:25.967
<v Speaker 2>there must be something bad here, there must be something

0:37:26.047 --> 0:37:29.967
<v Speaker 2>dodgy about her. And it's like, why are we surprised

0:37:29.967 --> 0:37:31.487
<v Speaker 2>that women don't want to put the heads above the

0:37:31.527 --> 0:37:34.407
<v Speaker 2>parapet and put things out there and talk about them

0:37:34.727 --> 0:37:36.087
<v Speaker 2>when this is what will come your way.

0:37:36.007 --> 0:37:36.367
<v Speaker 7>If you do.

0:37:38.687 --> 0:37:41.887
<v Speaker 5>Every Tuesday and Thursday, we drop new segments of Mummy

0:37:41.927 --> 0:37:45.527
<v Speaker 5>A out Loud just for MUMMYA subscribers. Follow the link

0:37:45.527 --> 0:37:47.407
<v Speaker 5>in the show notes to get your daily dose of

0:37:47.447 --> 0:37:49.927
<v Speaker 5>out Loud and a big thank you to all our

0:37:49.967 --> 0:37:50.927
<v Speaker 5>current subscribers.

0:37:58.927 --> 0:38:03.087
<v Speaker 2>Five people, including two doctors and his personal assistant, have

0:38:03.207 --> 0:38:06.807
<v Speaker 2>been changed in connection with Matthew Perry's drug related death.

0:38:07.047 --> 0:38:10.567
<v Speaker 2>Matthew Perry was so open about his history of drug

0:38:10.607 --> 0:38:13.407
<v Speaker 2>abuse that he wrote an entire book about it. It's

0:38:13.647 --> 0:38:15.887
<v Speaker 2>a really good book. We've spoken about it on the

0:38:15.927 --> 0:38:19.927
<v Speaker 2>show before, published before his death, about the fact that

0:38:20.047 --> 0:38:24.207
<v Speaker 2>he had been so addicted to payingkillers for decades, was

0:38:24.247 --> 0:38:27.367
<v Speaker 2>so deeply entrenched in his battle with addiction that he

0:38:27.527 --> 0:38:32.687
<v Speaker 2>had spent something like nine million American dollars on trying

0:38:32.727 --> 0:38:35.927
<v Speaker 2>to beat it over the years. Of course, Perry was

0:38:35.967 --> 0:38:41.247
<v Speaker 2>the very, very successful Friends star who died last October,

0:38:41.487 --> 0:38:44.327
<v Speaker 2>and many reports said that when he was found on

0:38:44.487 --> 0:38:47.367
<v Speaker 2>responsive in his hot tob and his La home that

0:38:47.447 --> 0:38:49.927
<v Speaker 2>it was a shock but not a surprise, And those

0:38:49.967 --> 0:38:52.767
<v Speaker 2>were actually the words that he used in his book

0:38:53.207 --> 0:38:56.207
<v Speaker 2>about how his own family would have felt at various

0:38:56.247 --> 0:39:00.167
<v Speaker 2>stages of his life if he had overdosed. So, if

0:39:00.167 --> 0:39:03.007
<v Speaker 2>his passing was a case of self inflicted OD, why

0:39:03.087 --> 0:39:08.207
<v Speaker 2>have five people now been charged over his death. Last Friday,

0:39:08.287 --> 0:39:11.207
<v Speaker 2>the news that police had arrested one of Perry's doctors,

0:39:11.247 --> 0:39:14.647
<v Speaker 2>his personal assistant, and a woman widely referred to as

0:39:14.687 --> 0:39:18.967
<v Speaker 2>the Ketamine Queen made headlines around the world. The fact

0:39:19.007 --> 0:39:21.647
<v Speaker 2>that he died of an overdose of ketamine, which is

0:39:21.687 --> 0:39:26.287
<v Speaker 2>a powerful, short acting anesthetic, was widely greeted with some

0:39:26.327 --> 0:39:29.527
<v Speaker 2>surprise in Hollywood last year because that drug has been

0:39:29.567 --> 0:39:33.567
<v Speaker 2>in the headlines a lot as a therapeutic treatment for

0:39:33.727 --> 0:39:38.687
<v Speaker 2>anxiety and depression among sort of Silicon Valley tech bros.

0:39:38.767 --> 0:39:41.047
<v Speaker 2>And there are in American this is certainly not true

0:39:41.047 --> 0:39:44.007
<v Speaker 2>in Australia. It is legal to be used in therapeutic

0:39:44.127 --> 0:39:46.847
<v Speaker 2>settings outside of hospitals, so it was once used as

0:39:46.847 --> 0:39:50.567
<v Speaker 2>an anesthetic and a tranquilizer, a horse tranquilizer, yeah, a

0:39:50.567 --> 0:39:53.687
<v Speaker 2>horse tranquiliser, but also by surgeons as a very effective

0:39:53.887 --> 0:39:58.607
<v Speaker 2>anesthetic for operations and very serious things. You know, I've

0:39:58.607 --> 0:40:01.607
<v Speaker 2>listened to podcast hosts talk about their therapy with it.

0:40:01.487 --> 0:40:06.527
<v Speaker 2>It had become sort of mainstreamed, right, But apparently what

0:40:06.687 --> 0:40:10.487
<v Speaker 2>had happened with Perry is is that his doctor first

0:40:10.487 --> 0:40:13.767
<v Speaker 2>prescribed him ketmine for depression. But as a man had

0:40:13.767 --> 0:40:16.847
<v Speaker 2>fought addictions to painkillers for decades, it's not surprising that

0:40:16.967 --> 0:40:19.607
<v Speaker 2>his use spiraled, and by the time of his death,

0:40:20.127 --> 0:40:23.407
<v Speaker 2>his assistant police alleged was injecting him many times a

0:40:23.487 --> 0:40:25.447
<v Speaker 2>day with dangerous levels.

0:40:25.207 --> 0:40:25.727
<v Speaker 7>Of the drug.

0:40:25.927 --> 0:40:28.367
<v Speaker 1>It was so sad reading about that. It was in

0:40:28.447 --> 0:40:30.087
<v Speaker 1>his doctor tragedy.

0:40:29.767 --> 0:40:32.807
<v Speaker 2>And the woman who was the dealer it seems here,

0:40:32.847 --> 0:40:35.807
<v Speaker 2>who they largely call the ketamine Queen, who apparently deals

0:40:35.807 --> 0:40:38.887
<v Speaker 2>with a lot of very high end Hollywood clients, were

0:40:38.967 --> 0:40:41.287
<v Speaker 2>convinced that they could get Perry to pay almost anything

0:40:41.327 --> 0:40:43.687
<v Speaker 2>for this drug. There was a text from the doctor saying,

0:40:43.727 --> 0:40:46.327
<v Speaker 2>I wonder how much this moron would pay, and the

0:40:46.407 --> 0:40:48.847
<v Speaker 2>answer was a lot. He apparently was paying more than

0:40:48.847 --> 0:40:52.527
<v Speaker 2>one hundred and sixty five times its price by the

0:40:52.607 --> 0:40:55.807
<v Speaker 2>time of his death. Jesse, do you think that this

0:40:55.927 --> 0:41:00.607
<v Speaker 2>story will derail that changing narrative about drugs like ketamine

0:41:00.607 --> 0:41:02.807
<v Speaker 2>being used in therapy or is it just a story

0:41:02.927 --> 0:41:06.847
<v Speaker 2>about a celebrity who was able to push all the guardrails.

0:41:07.047 --> 0:41:07.967
<v Speaker 3>I don't think it will.

0:41:08.407 --> 0:41:12.567
<v Speaker 5>The more I rare about this story, the more I

0:41:13.007 --> 0:41:15.767
<v Speaker 5>realized that it was about someone who was in such

0:41:15.767 --> 0:41:18.087
<v Speaker 5>a position that no one could say no to him,

0:41:18.367 --> 0:41:20.607
<v Speaker 5>and that's the most dangerous position anyone can be in.

0:41:21.127 --> 0:41:24.407
<v Speaker 5>There was a great column by Marina Hyde who said,

0:41:24.807 --> 0:41:28.687
<v Speaker 5>getting yourself into a position where people can't deny you

0:41:29.087 --> 0:41:32.927
<v Speaker 5>of what you ask for is where things get really scary.

0:41:33.047 --> 0:41:36.967
<v Speaker 5>I think Michael Jackson was in a similar position. It

0:41:37.087 --> 0:41:38.887
<v Speaker 5>kind of clarified, and I think that this is more

0:41:38.927 --> 0:41:41.367
<v Speaker 5>the case in the US, and it is in Australia.

0:41:41.407 --> 0:41:45.167
<v Speaker 5>But if you have enough money, the hippocratic oath of

0:41:45.367 --> 0:41:48.447
<v Speaker 5>do no harm can be absolutely ignored. There are people

0:41:48.967 --> 0:41:52.207
<v Speaker 5>at all levels in medicine who have studied this because

0:41:52.927 --> 0:41:54.927
<v Speaker 5>reading this from the outside, you would go, oh, he

0:41:55.007 --> 0:41:57.887
<v Speaker 5>had a drug dealer, like a street drug dealer, but

0:41:57.927 --> 0:42:00.527
<v Speaker 5>you go no. These were people in white coats who

0:42:00.607 --> 0:42:04.807
<v Speaker 5>had an absolute responsibility to him and his health to

0:42:04.927 --> 0:42:07.047
<v Speaker 5>not give him as much as he wanted. Because the

0:42:07.087 --> 0:42:10.647
<v Speaker 5>doctors who had initially prescribed this or his mental health

0:42:10.647 --> 0:42:13.007
<v Speaker 5>issues they were allowed to do that, did so in

0:42:13.047 --> 0:42:16.127
<v Speaker 5>small doses. He felt it wasn't enough for him and

0:42:16.167 --> 0:42:17.367
<v Speaker 5>so he was going.

0:42:17.447 --> 0:42:19.887
<v Speaker 1>And the clinic I think ended up refusing to treat

0:42:19.967 --> 0:42:22.167
<v Speaker 1>him because he was wanting more and more.

0:42:22.207 --> 0:42:23.487
<v Speaker 3>But they were doing the right thing.

0:42:24.007 --> 0:42:29.807
<v Speaker 1>This is the problem with not everyone can take drugs

0:42:29.847 --> 0:42:31.727
<v Speaker 1>and have the same effect. I don't just mean the

0:42:31.727 --> 0:42:35.047
<v Speaker 1>effect of the drugs, I mean how they feel about

0:42:35.087 --> 0:42:37.687
<v Speaker 1>it afterwards. So Holy, I've listened to some of the

0:42:37.687 --> 0:42:40.207
<v Speaker 1>same podcasts as you with people that we both know

0:42:40.367 --> 0:42:44.407
<v Speaker 1>who've tried ketamine therapy, and they literally, because these are

0:42:44.407 --> 0:42:47.127
<v Speaker 1>people who don't take drugs or don't have problems with addiction,

0:42:47.447 --> 0:42:49.487
<v Speaker 1>they go to the clinic, they take it, they go, oh,

0:42:49.527 --> 0:42:51.207
<v Speaker 1>that was interesting, and either they liked it or they

0:42:51.247 --> 0:42:54.327
<v Speaker 1>didn't like it. But then that's the end, right, It's

0:42:54.367 --> 0:42:57.847
<v Speaker 1>like having a one time experience. But people who have

0:42:57.927 --> 0:43:00.487
<v Speaker 1>addiction issues, or who are prone to addiction, who have

0:43:00.527 --> 0:43:03.967
<v Speaker 1>a history of addiction, they can't. So there is no

0:43:04.167 --> 0:43:06.447
<v Speaker 1>safe way. There was never a safe going to be

0:43:06.447 --> 0:43:09.927
<v Speaker 1>a safe way for Matthew Perry to try ketamine.

0:43:10.007 --> 0:43:12.207
<v Speaker 3>And this is what's confusing, right, because I was looking

0:43:12.207 --> 0:43:12.447
<v Speaker 3>it up.

0:43:12.527 --> 0:43:17.607
<v Speaker 5>Ketamine isn't addictive, but the feeling you get from the

0:43:17.727 --> 0:43:21.247
<v Speaker 5>ketamine is likely addictive to someone who has had a

0:43:21.327 --> 0:43:24.047
<v Speaker 5>history of an addictive so I think that the doctors

0:43:24.087 --> 0:43:27.847
<v Speaker 5>who initially prescribed did it in a controlled way were

0:43:27.847 --> 0:43:30.247
<v Speaker 5>probably doing the right thing. And there are doctors who

0:43:30.287 --> 0:43:33.727
<v Speaker 5>are exploring this and doing research papers, and I encourage that.

0:43:33.807 --> 0:43:36.247
<v Speaker 5>I think the more research we do about treatments for

0:43:36.247 --> 0:43:38.927
<v Speaker 5>anxiety and depression and pain and all of it is

0:43:39.007 --> 0:43:39.567
<v Speaker 5>really good.

0:43:40.047 --> 0:43:41.767
<v Speaker 3>But to me, this.

0:43:41.687 --> 0:43:45.967
<v Speaker 5>Became about wanting more and having the means. But I

0:43:46.007 --> 0:43:49.847
<v Speaker 5>suppose that if you're someone who is an addict, whether

0:43:49.967 --> 0:43:52.167
<v Speaker 5>or not you're Matthew Perry, and you have all the

0:43:52.167 --> 0:43:55.327
<v Speaker 5>money in the world, the lengths you'll go to to

0:43:55.447 --> 0:43:59.207
<v Speaker 5>get what you want are pretty extreme, which is what

0:43:59.287 --> 0:43:59.807
<v Speaker 5>we saw.

0:44:00.087 --> 0:44:04.647
<v Speaker 1>His personal assistant had been working for him since nineteen

0:44:04.767 --> 0:44:07.927
<v Speaker 1>ninety four. I also have read the book, and you

0:44:07.927 --> 0:44:10.407
<v Speaker 1>know clearly he was had a lot of drug problems

0:44:10.407 --> 0:44:14.087
<v Speaker 1>through that whole time. He really struggled with addiction. So

0:44:14.167 --> 0:44:17.327
<v Speaker 1>this is obviously someone who has been and it's hard

0:44:17.327 --> 0:44:19.927
<v Speaker 1>to say whether he was enabling Perry. I mean he was,

0:44:19.967 --> 0:44:24.047
<v Speaker 1>but also he needed a job presumably, or was he

0:44:24.167 --> 0:44:29.807
<v Speaker 1>exploding Perry. Was Perry exploiting him. It's really hard to say.

0:44:30.207 --> 0:44:35.007
<v Speaker 1>And that's why when he died suddenly, and all those

0:44:35.047 --> 0:44:37.047
<v Speaker 1>people rushed out to say, no, there were no drug

0:44:37.047 --> 0:44:39.887
<v Speaker 1>paraphernalia found in the house. That's because the assistant who

0:44:39.967 --> 0:44:42.807
<v Speaker 1>had injected him that morning more than once, came home

0:44:42.927 --> 0:44:45.367
<v Speaker 1>found his body quickly before calling nine to one one

0:44:45.727 --> 0:44:48.167
<v Speaker 1>after he'd pulled him out and established that he couldn't

0:44:48.167 --> 0:44:51.607
<v Speaker 1>be arrived, went and cleaned up all the drug paraphernalia,

0:44:51.687 --> 0:44:54.087
<v Speaker 1>so it wasn't found. But then so much catamine was

0:44:54.127 --> 0:44:56.687
<v Speaker 1>found in his system that it started this investigation. But

0:44:56.727 --> 0:44:58.847
<v Speaker 1>I mean, anyone who was following him on social media,

0:44:59.167 --> 0:45:00.767
<v Speaker 1>all these claims, Oh he was sober, He was so

0:45:00.807 --> 0:45:02.927
<v Speaker 1>but he wasn't sober, and you could tell that by

0:45:02.927 --> 0:45:04.767
<v Speaker 1>looking at his social posts.

0:45:04.767 --> 0:45:07.487
<v Speaker 5>There were also they were able to look at the

0:45:07.687 --> 0:45:11.087
<v Speaker 5>Google searches of the ketamine Queen as they called her,

0:45:11.407 --> 0:45:14.127
<v Speaker 5>who had very quickly googled if ketemine can be cited

0:45:14.167 --> 0:45:16.287
<v Speaker 5>as a cause of death, and then in the group

0:45:16.327 --> 0:45:19.327
<v Speaker 5>text were saying delete these threads, delete these threads. I'm

0:45:19.407 --> 0:45:21.887
<v Speaker 5>ninety percent sure we're not liable that kind of thing.

0:45:22.007 --> 0:45:25.487
<v Speaker 5>So there was obviously some understanding of how dangerous these

0:45:25.527 --> 0:45:27.807
<v Speaker 5>levels were. They just didn't care because of the money

0:45:27.807 --> 0:45:29.847
<v Speaker 5>they were getting. I think they said, like twelve US

0:45:29.887 --> 0:45:32.047
<v Speaker 5>dollars for a vile of kenemine. They were selling it

0:45:32.047 --> 0:45:32.767
<v Speaker 5>for thousands.

0:45:33.007 --> 0:45:35.527
<v Speaker 2>One of the reasons why I really I think about

0:45:35.607 --> 0:45:37.727
<v Speaker 2>Matthew Perry's book a lot is because I think it

0:45:37.887 --> 0:45:40.967
<v Speaker 2>is one of the most honest and visceral descriptions of

0:45:40.967 --> 0:45:45.407
<v Speaker 2>addiction that I've ever read. Because I think from the outside,

0:45:45.487 --> 0:45:50.767
<v Speaker 2>it might be simple to dismiss, you know, his struggles

0:45:50.887 --> 0:45:53.047
<v Speaker 2>as well. He was a man with too much privilege

0:45:53.047 --> 0:45:55.927
<v Speaker 2>and too much access to everything, But he often talked

0:45:55.967 --> 0:45:59.487
<v Speaker 2>about how, you know, other people he knew could walk

0:45:59.567 --> 0:46:01.967
<v Speaker 2>away from things that he absolutely couldn't, which is back

0:46:02.007 --> 0:46:04.647
<v Speaker 2>to what you said mea. The thing about it is

0:46:04.727 --> 0:46:07.247
<v Speaker 2>really good, Jesse, that all these different kinds of drugs

0:46:07.247 --> 0:46:10.167
<v Speaker 2>that are illegal and now being re examined in a

0:46:10.207 --> 0:46:14.047
<v Speaker 2>way because there's also lots of hallucinogen research about whether

0:46:14.087 --> 0:46:16.567
<v Speaker 2>that can help with anxiety and depression. But you'll often

0:46:16.567 --> 0:46:19.727
<v Speaker 2>hear addicts say, people who are sober and in recovery,

0:46:19.967 --> 0:46:22.807
<v Speaker 2>that's just not an option that I can take because

0:46:22.807 --> 0:46:26.127
<v Speaker 2>I know what will happen. And Matthew Perry was in

0:46:26.127 --> 0:46:28.447
<v Speaker 2>that camp, and he would have known that too, And

0:46:28.487 --> 0:46:32.487
<v Speaker 2>it's just so heartbreakingly sad that there's a little industry

0:46:32.527 --> 0:46:36.007
<v Speaker 2>there that were just so ready and eager to exploit

0:46:36.087 --> 0:46:39.527
<v Speaker 2>that and call the man a moron and give him

0:46:39.527 --> 0:46:41.807
<v Speaker 2>as much as he could physically, well not even that

0:46:41.887 --> 0:46:45.167
<v Speaker 2>he couldn't physically take. It's just kind of devastatingly sad.

0:46:45.207 --> 0:46:48.447
<v Speaker 2>I think for the people around Matthew Perry who just

0:46:48.487 --> 0:46:51.247
<v Speaker 2>can't understand why this could never be beaten for him.

0:46:52.047 --> 0:46:54.927
<v Speaker 1>Last week, em Rada needed our help, didn't she.

0:46:54.927 --> 0:46:55.807
<v Speaker 3>She did just.

0:46:55.727 --> 0:46:59.887
<v Speaker 5>Because she's divorced, and in a recent interview she opened

0:46:59.967 --> 0:47:03.327
<v Speaker 5>up about what became of her marriage, how the dynamic shifted.

0:47:03.887 --> 0:47:06.967
<v Speaker 5>And there's also a viral video going around talking about

0:47:07.007 --> 0:47:12.047
<v Speaker 5>this theory that no marriage can sustain to big jobs,

0:47:12.607 --> 0:47:16.407
<v Speaker 5>and we discussed whether that's true. We looked at how

0:47:16.527 --> 0:47:19.407
<v Speaker 5>em Rata kind of fell victim to a lot of

0:47:19.447 --> 0:47:22.807
<v Speaker 5>the gendered dynamics that a lot of women do, and

0:47:22.847 --> 0:47:25.767
<v Speaker 5>it made for a very interesting conversation. A link to

0:47:25.807 --> 0:47:28.327
<v Speaker 5>that subscriber episode will be in the show notes.

0:47:28.887 --> 0:47:30.967
<v Speaker 2>Thank you out Louders for being with us on this

0:47:31.047 --> 0:47:33.287
<v Speaker 2>post logis Monday. I don't think that Meo did too

0:47:33.327 --> 0:47:36.087
<v Speaker 2>much of a carl, did she really? She backed that

0:47:36.167 --> 0:47:39.247
<v Speaker 2>up pretty well. We will be back in your ears

0:47:39.247 --> 0:47:43.247
<v Speaker 2>tomorrow and thank you to our fabulous team for helping

0:47:43.287 --> 0:47:44.327
<v Speaker 2>us put this show together.

0:47:44.687 --> 0:47:45.727
<v Speaker 4>We'll see you tomorrow.

0:47:45.807 --> 0:47:46.727
<v Speaker 7>Bye bye.

0:47:47.487 --> 0:47:50.367
<v Speaker 2>Shout out to any Mamma Mia subscribers listening. If you

0:47:50.527 --> 0:47:53.407
<v Speaker 2>love the show and you want to support us, subscribing

0:47:53.407 --> 0:47:55.887
<v Speaker 2>to MoMA Mia is the very best way to do it.

0:47:56.047 --> 0:47:57.927
<v Speaker 2>There's a link in the episode description.