WEBVTT - Gus Walz, Emotional Policing & A Villain

0:00:10.287 --> 0:00:13.047
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to a MoMA Mia podcast.

0:00:13.727 --> 0:00:16.767
<v Speaker 2>Mamma Mia acknowledges the traditional owners of land and waters

0:00:16.807 --> 0:00:23.607
<v Speaker 2>that this podcast is recorded on Hello and welcome to

0:00:23.647 --> 0:00:26.327
<v Speaker 2>Mama Mia out Loud. It's what women are actually talking

0:00:26.367 --> 0:00:29.167
<v Speaker 2>about on Monday, the twenty sixth of August, and I'm

0:00:29.247 --> 0:00:30.567
<v Speaker 2>Holly Wainwright, I'm.

0:00:30.407 --> 0:00:32.367
<v Speaker 3>Mea Friedman, and I'm Jesse Stevens.

0:00:32.767 --> 0:00:35.727
<v Speaker 2>On the show today, how a seventeen year old boy

0:00:35.887 --> 0:00:40.047
<v Speaker 2>and some down shifting alpha blokes started a conversation about

0:00:40.047 --> 0:00:43.527
<v Speaker 2>good men on the world stage. Also, as of today,

0:00:44.087 --> 0:00:47.367
<v Speaker 2>you are legally allowed to ignore your boss after hours,

0:00:47.847 --> 0:00:49.527
<v Speaker 2>or are you? That sound you can hear is me

0:00:49.647 --> 0:00:55.247
<v Speaker 2>leaving all my group chats with Mia and she's going

0:00:55.327 --> 0:00:57.927
<v Speaker 2>to steal herself for that. For that conversation.

0:00:58.047 --> 0:01:02.367
<v Speaker 1>Hollywayen Wrights left the chat and the trick to solving

0:01:02.487 --> 0:01:05.647
<v Speaker 1>all your clothes problems comes down apparently to a three

0:01:05.847 --> 0:01:06.767
<v Speaker 1>word system.

0:01:06.967 --> 0:01:08.967
<v Speaker 2>But first, Jesse Stevens.

0:01:09.607 --> 0:01:12.807
<v Speaker 3>In case you missed it, Ben Affleck has been pictured

0:01:12.847 --> 0:01:16.647
<v Speaker 3>with another woman amid his separation from Jennifer Lopez, and

0:01:16.807 --> 0:01:21.647
<v Speaker 3>that woman is Kick Kennedy, the daughter of Robert F. Kennedy.

0:01:22.367 --> 0:01:24.607
<v Speaker 3>Just a note on the Kennedy's there's a lot of them.

0:01:25.087 --> 0:01:28.567
<v Speaker 3>Can someone I tried to google? But Kick Kennedy was

0:01:28.607 --> 0:01:31.607
<v Speaker 3>a sister and a niece and a nephew and blah

0:01:31.607 --> 0:01:35.727
<v Speaker 3>blah blah. So is my Kick. Yes, the niece of

0:01:35.767 --> 0:01:36.727
<v Speaker 3>the JFK.

0:01:36.487 --> 0:01:41.567
<v Speaker 1>One, Robert Kennedy Junior. His father was Robert Kennedy, who

0:01:41.607 --> 0:01:42.607
<v Speaker 1>was the brother.

0:01:43.407 --> 0:01:47.247
<v Speaker 3>Of I've missed a generation here. See there's a lot.

0:01:47.647 --> 0:01:50.927
<v Speaker 1>He was assassinated as well as JFK being assassinated.

0:01:51.207 --> 0:01:54.247
<v Speaker 2>But Kick's dad, as Maya says, is the one who

0:01:54.327 --> 0:01:56.047
<v Speaker 2>was running for president until five minutes.

0:01:56.087 --> 0:01:58.527
<v Speaker 1>It was a very big weekend for the that part

0:01:58.567 --> 0:01:59.687
<v Speaker 1>of the Kennedy family.

0:01:59.767 --> 0:02:02.967
<v Speaker 2>The backup, back up, Ben has moved on so quickly.

0:02:03.927 --> 0:02:07.287
<v Speaker 3>This is correct, it's this scoreless gossip. Yes it is.

0:02:07.567 --> 0:02:10.207
<v Speaker 3>Kick Kennedy is thirty six years old. She's been pictured

0:02:10.247 --> 0:02:12.407
<v Speaker 3>with fifty two year old Ben at the Polo Lounge

0:02:12.407 --> 0:02:15.527
<v Speaker 3>at the Beverly Hills Hotel, as well as at other

0:02:15.807 --> 0:02:20.247
<v Speaker 3>hotspots hotspots. Holly discuss it's probably not.

0:02:20.167 --> 0:02:25.567
<v Speaker 1>True, but I'm here for it's it's very random because

0:02:25.607 --> 0:02:25.967
<v Speaker 1>I read it.

0:02:25.967 --> 0:02:28.447
<v Speaker 2>Well, that's true, And often the more random the story,

0:02:28.487 --> 0:02:31.047
<v Speaker 2>the more real it is. And again, out loud as

0:02:31.087 --> 0:02:33.407
<v Speaker 2>we know this is scurrilous gossip, but we also know

0:02:33.527 --> 0:02:35.527
<v Speaker 2>you're invested in the benefit divorce, so we want to

0:02:35.607 --> 0:02:36.967
<v Speaker 2>keep you up to date because you wouldn't want to

0:02:36.967 --> 0:02:37.447
<v Speaker 2>miss anything.

0:02:37.487 --> 0:02:38.567
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, exactly, wouldn't want to.

0:02:38.527 --> 0:02:41.367
<v Speaker 1>Miss anthy you mean us.

0:02:41.487 --> 0:02:46.807
<v Speaker 2>But also it maybe explains the timing of the divorce

0:02:46.887 --> 0:02:49.767
<v Speaker 2>filing because, as we discussed last week, they've been separated

0:02:49.807 --> 0:02:52.247
<v Speaker 2>for a while. They've been working out whether or not

0:02:52.287 --> 0:02:54.287
<v Speaker 2>to push the button, pull the trigger, whatever you want

0:02:54.287 --> 0:02:58.047
<v Speaker 2>to call it. And maybe the fact that Ben is

0:02:58.087 --> 0:03:01.887
<v Speaker 2>hanging around with someone new it seems like a push

0:03:01.967 --> 0:03:02.447
<v Speaker 2>the trigger.

0:03:02.567 --> 0:03:05.047
<v Speaker 3>No, incorrect, You've got the timing wrong. What's happened is

0:03:05.047 --> 0:03:07.727
<v Speaker 3>that Jlo has filed for divorce, which we all said

0:03:07.767 --> 0:03:09.887
<v Speaker 3>was a bit of a power move. He kind of

0:03:10.047 --> 0:03:13.487
<v Speaker 3>played her cards when she filed for the separation. Now

0:03:13.487 --> 0:03:16.727
<v Speaker 3>it was Ben's move, and this is Ben's move. It

0:03:16.767 --> 0:03:19.287
<v Speaker 3>was ball in his court and he went, I've got kick,

0:03:19.607 --> 0:03:22.407
<v Speaker 3>who is even though I don't fully understand the family

0:03:22.447 --> 0:03:25.527
<v Speaker 3>tree an American institution, I'm hanging out with thirty six

0:03:25.647 --> 0:03:26.087
<v Speaker 3>year old.

0:03:26.007 --> 0:03:30.407
<v Speaker 2>Kick Another American institution, Jennifer Lopezi, the American institution. So

0:03:30.527 --> 0:03:34.207
<v Speaker 2>you think divorce filing. Wednesday, Ben got out his little

0:03:34.247 --> 0:03:36.327
<v Speaker 2>black book and went who could I go on a

0:03:36.407 --> 0:03:38.847
<v Speaker 2>high profile date with? To the poet last tonight?

0:03:38.967 --> 0:03:40.607
<v Speaker 3>And the reason I want to talk about this is

0:03:40.647 --> 0:03:43.647
<v Speaker 3>because of how relatable it is because I once broke

0:03:43.727 --> 0:03:45.687
<v Speaker 3>up with someone. Well I think he broke up with me,

0:03:45.767 --> 0:03:48.167
<v Speaker 3>but anyway, that doesn't matter. And then I went on

0:03:48.207 --> 0:03:50.767
<v Speaker 3>Instagram and he posted a picture of him with some

0:03:51.287 --> 0:03:54.247
<v Speaker 3>woman Where did she come from? At the end of

0:03:54.327 --> 0:03:57.927
<v Speaker 3>a run which was very passag because I can't run,

0:03:58.087 --> 0:04:00.047
<v Speaker 3>so it was like a very I went for a

0:04:00.127 --> 0:04:02.847
<v Speaker 3>run with this beautiful who can woman who's got rosy

0:04:02.887 --> 0:04:06.727
<v Speaker 3>cheeks from exerting herself. And when I saw that, I

0:04:06.767 --> 0:04:08.807
<v Speaker 3>went I know how Ja Loo feels because I have

0:04:08.887 --> 0:04:11.007
<v Speaker 3>also had to have a look at the new woman.

0:04:11.127 --> 0:04:12.847
<v Speaker 1>Had they gone for rhinal had they just had.

0:04:12.687 --> 0:04:15.087
<v Speaker 3>Sex, Maybe they'd had sex, but they made it look

0:04:15.127 --> 0:04:17.327
<v Speaker 3>like they were doing very something, very wholesome on a Saturday,

0:04:17.367 --> 0:04:19.047
<v Speaker 3>and it made me feel bad. And I think that

0:04:19.127 --> 0:04:26.967
<v Speaker 3>j Loo is annoyed today. Help Gosh and Gwen.

0:04:27.567 --> 0:04:30.407
<v Speaker 4>You are my empire world and I love you.

0:04:31.447 --> 0:04:35.727
<v Speaker 2>Last week in America was all about Kamala Harris in

0:04:35.807 --> 0:04:38.887
<v Speaker 2>the minds of delusional small el liberals like me everywhere.

0:04:38.927 --> 0:04:41.247
<v Speaker 2>We have a new queen and she wears a navy

0:04:41.287 --> 0:04:43.047
<v Speaker 2>pantsuit with a pussy bow shirt.

0:04:43.407 --> 0:04:44.727
<v Speaker 3>It's a pussy bow shirt back.

0:04:44.927 --> 0:04:48.567
<v Speaker 2>Yes, I know this isn't important louds for her big

0:04:48.607 --> 0:04:49.767
<v Speaker 2>speech on Friday.

0:04:49.927 --> 0:04:50.687
<v Speaker 1>It's important.

0:04:50.847 --> 0:04:54.207
<v Speaker 2>She wore a very like, understated but very classy. I

0:04:54.247 --> 0:04:58.687
<v Speaker 2>wouldn't you agree me, Chloe suit, which is fancy A

0:04:58.687 --> 0:05:04.607
<v Speaker 2>class designer pantsuit fitted pussy bow shirt. Excellent. Anyway, It

0:05:04.647 --> 0:05:07.367
<v Speaker 2>was the DNC, the Democratic National Convention, as we discussed

0:05:07.367 --> 0:05:10.087
<v Speaker 2>briefly last week, and it dominated did the global news

0:05:10.167 --> 0:05:12.047
<v Speaker 2>cycle for a week, as it was designed to do.

0:05:12.687 --> 0:05:16.367
<v Speaker 2>There were quite a few storylines. There were impassioned talks

0:05:16.407 --> 0:05:19.727
<v Speaker 2>about abortion from survivors of sexual abuse, about gun violence

0:05:19.727 --> 0:05:23.607
<v Speaker 2>from survivors of shootings. There were anti war protesters outside.

0:05:23.967 --> 0:05:27.487
<v Speaker 2>There was the much admired speeches from Michelle Obama, Oprah Winfrey,

0:05:27.567 --> 0:05:30.487
<v Speaker 2>Hillary Clinton, and of course Kamala Harris herself. But I

0:05:30.607 --> 0:05:33.607
<v Speaker 2>want to talk about blokes, not about all those amazing women,

0:05:34.327 --> 0:05:37.007
<v Speaker 2>because of course I do, because whether or not you

0:05:37.047 --> 0:05:39.207
<v Speaker 2>give U stuff about American politics, and I know quite

0:05:39.247 --> 0:05:41.047
<v Speaker 2>a lot of you listening do not there is something

0:05:41.207 --> 0:05:46.727
<v Speaker 2>very interesting bubbling along here about masculinity and celebrations of

0:05:46.767 --> 0:05:50.207
<v Speaker 2>a different kind of masculinity that was on big display

0:05:50.367 --> 0:05:54.167
<v Speaker 2>last week, and it's in very stark opposition to Trump's

0:05:54.847 --> 0:05:59.367
<v Speaker 2>very basic man strong, big, strong man, face down, scary

0:05:59.407 --> 0:06:00.447
<v Speaker 2>of the strong men act.

0:06:00.807 --> 0:06:01.047
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:06:01.887 --> 0:06:04.847
<v Speaker 2>Obviously, there's the subtext here that every powerful man who

0:06:04.927 --> 0:06:08.167
<v Speaker 2>took the stage over those four days was in support

0:06:08.207 --> 0:06:13.407
<v Speaker 2>of a powerful woman. But also those men showing a human,

0:06:13.567 --> 0:06:17.167
<v Speaker 2>emotional and family side seemed to be very high on

0:06:17.207 --> 0:06:19.407
<v Speaker 2>the priority scale of what they were there to do.

0:06:20.247 --> 0:06:23.287
<v Speaker 2>There was Kamala's husband, Doug em Hoff, who was beautifully

0:06:23.287 --> 0:06:26.447
<v Speaker 2>introduced by a very emotional video by his son. Now

0:06:26.527 --> 0:06:30.607
<v Speaker 2>Doug is a hyper successful lawyer entertainment lawyer in Los

0:06:30.607 --> 0:06:34.127
<v Speaker 2>Angeles who quit his regular job to support Kamala as

0:06:34.247 --> 0:06:36.847
<v Speaker 2>VP and now to get her elected. And her talk

0:06:36.887 --> 0:06:39.047
<v Speaker 2>he gave, and the pride and the strength he shows

0:06:39.047 --> 0:06:41.927
<v Speaker 2>at being the man behind the woman is a vibe

0:06:42.247 --> 0:06:45.327
<v Speaker 2>he will be, obviously if she is elected, the first

0:06:46.007 --> 0:06:48.767
<v Speaker 2>first gentleman and the last time a woman ran. Obviously,

0:06:48.847 --> 0:06:51.207
<v Speaker 2>her first gentleman had been the president. So this is

0:06:51.247 --> 0:06:53.487
<v Speaker 2>an entirely new vibe that was.

0:06:53.527 --> 0:06:56.847
<v Speaker 1>Currently the second gentleman, because she's the vice president.

0:06:56.487 --> 0:06:58.927
<v Speaker 2>And that's the job. Apparently it is a job, not

0:06:58.967 --> 0:07:01.407
<v Speaker 2>a paid one. And then there was of course Tim Waltz,

0:07:01.647 --> 0:07:06.087
<v Speaker 2>who's Harris's nice guy running mate, and his excellent mind

0:07:06.127 --> 0:07:08.607
<v Speaker 2>your own goddamn business speech, which is what he's very

0:07:08.607 --> 0:07:12.967
<v Speaker 2>good at doing. Is like where I'm from in the Midwest,

0:07:13.167 --> 0:07:15.487
<v Speaker 2>we stay out of each other's bedrooms. Like he's really

0:07:15.527 --> 0:07:19.127
<v Speaker 2>good at that stuff. But his speech was almost overshadowed

0:07:19.127 --> 0:07:22.727
<v Speaker 2>by the attendants of his young son Gus. Now Gus

0:07:22.807 --> 0:07:25.047
<v Speaker 2>was in the stands watching his dad speak, along with

0:07:25.127 --> 0:07:28.647
<v Speaker 2>his mum, Gwen and his sister Hope. Gus Waltz, according

0:07:28.647 --> 0:07:31.327
<v Speaker 2>to his parents, has a non verbal learning disorder in

0:07:31.367 --> 0:07:35.887
<v Speaker 2>addition to an anxiety disorder and ADHD. In this case,

0:07:35.967 --> 0:07:39.087
<v Speaker 2>a non verbal disorder is not the same as non speaking.

0:07:39.567 --> 0:07:42.247
<v Speaker 2>It's a disorder that impacts the way that kids absorb

0:07:42.287 --> 0:07:45.687
<v Speaker 2>and utilize information. But there are lots of interventions you

0:07:45.727 --> 0:07:48.207
<v Speaker 2>can have and it doesn't mean that Gus can't talk

0:07:48.247 --> 0:07:50.767
<v Speaker 2>and Gus drives and all of those things. Tim and

0:07:50.807 --> 0:07:53.887
<v Speaker 2>Gwen have spoken about it several times, and they definitely

0:07:53.927 --> 0:07:58.807
<v Speaker 2>refer to him as neurodivergent and his very enthusiastic response

0:07:58.847 --> 0:08:02.327
<v Speaker 2>to his dad led some people to mock him. Imagine

0:08:02.487 --> 0:08:04.567
<v Speaker 2>being that awful, But anyway.

0:08:04.487 --> 0:08:08.767
<v Speaker 1>Are you serious, because all I've seen is love for him.

0:08:09.087 --> 0:08:11.927
<v Speaker 1>He became quite iconic quite quickly because when I saw it,

0:08:12.447 --> 0:08:15.567
<v Speaker 1>I saw this young man getting very emotional tears in

0:08:15.567 --> 0:08:18.167
<v Speaker 1>his eyes, getting up and saying, that's my dad, that's

0:08:18.247 --> 0:08:20.967
<v Speaker 1>my dad, and this is awful. But I thought at

0:08:21.007 --> 0:08:24.847
<v Speaker 1>the time, Oh no, that kid's going to cop it

0:08:24.887 --> 0:08:27.767
<v Speaker 1>at school and he's just been caught up in the moment.

0:08:28.047 --> 0:08:31.847
<v Speaker 1>That's before I learned that he was neurodivergent and had

0:08:31.887 --> 0:08:34.847
<v Speaker 1>some challenges in his life, and then it made more

0:08:34.887 --> 0:08:38.127
<v Speaker 1>sense to me. But have some people been horrible to him?

0:08:38.367 --> 0:08:39.967
<v Speaker 2>So I'm going to play you a tiny bit of

0:08:39.967 --> 0:08:44.247
<v Speaker 2>a TikTok for an example. So there's a famous conservative

0:08:44.287 --> 0:08:48.287
<v Speaker 2>commentator called Ann Coulter. She has written book about Donald

0:08:48.287 --> 0:08:50.327
<v Speaker 2>Trump and all the rest of it, and she immediately

0:08:50.487 --> 0:08:53.167
<v Speaker 2>shared a shot of Gus Waltz along with the line

0:08:53.647 --> 0:08:56.847
<v Speaker 2>talk about weird, which was obviously in response to the

0:08:56.887 --> 0:08:59.407
<v Speaker 2>fact that Tim Waltz has coined the term weird for

0:08:59.447 --> 0:09:03.327
<v Speaker 2>the religious conservatives on the Republican side. Anyway, here's a

0:09:03.327 --> 0:09:05.207
<v Speaker 2>little TikTok by somebody responding to that.

0:09:05.647 --> 0:09:05.927
<v Speaker 1>Y'all.

0:09:06.007 --> 0:09:07.887
<v Speaker 5>I'm recording on the very last day of the Democratic

0:09:07.967 --> 0:09:10.047
<v Speaker 5>National Convention here in Chicago, Illinois, and I feel like

0:09:10.087 --> 0:09:14.087
<v Speaker 5>the entire week I've been very demure, very mindful, very cutesy.

0:09:14.167 --> 0:09:16.647
<v Speaker 5>But ever since I saw Ian Coulter say this about

0:09:16.647 --> 0:09:19.607
<v Speaker 5>Tim Walls's son who was disabled, I'm gonna say, fuck

0:09:19.647 --> 0:09:20.887
<v Speaker 5>that shit, it's all out of the window.

0:09:21.367 --> 0:09:25.367
<v Speaker 2>And then she went on to drag hard culture into

0:09:25.407 --> 0:09:28.727
<v Speaker 2>the coach and say, never mind, we go Hi, We're

0:09:28.767 --> 0:09:31.007
<v Speaker 2>dragging everybody down into hell with us now. So it

0:09:31.087 --> 0:09:33.887
<v Speaker 2>pissed a lot of people off, but equally, as you say,

0:09:33.967 --> 0:09:37.007
<v Speaker 2>Mia Gos kind of became iconic, and Tim Waltz drew

0:09:37.047 --> 0:09:40.287
<v Speaker 2>an enormous amount of praise, which is also weird when

0:09:40.367 --> 0:09:43.447
<v Speaker 2>you think about it, for actively loving his family, which

0:09:43.527 --> 0:09:45.527
<v Speaker 2>kind of shows you how low the bar is here.

0:09:45.647 --> 0:09:48.327
<v Speaker 1>Well, compare and contrast it with the other model of

0:09:48.367 --> 0:09:52.407
<v Speaker 1>masculinity and family that we're seeing, which is the big

0:09:52.447 --> 0:09:56.367
<v Speaker 1>difference between the Republican National Convention and the Democratic National Convention.

0:09:57.327 --> 0:10:00.247
<v Speaker 1>It's so clear, like when you see the Trump family

0:10:00.327 --> 0:10:03.927
<v Speaker 1>on stage, like Milania has got a contract. She won't

0:10:03.927 --> 0:10:07.527
<v Speaker 1>even look at him, will barely touch his hand, like

0:10:07.687 --> 0:10:10.407
<v Speaker 1>there's not a lot of love in that family. Donald

0:10:10.447 --> 0:10:14.007
<v Speaker 1>Trump never speaks about his kids in any way except

0:10:14.007 --> 0:10:16.567
<v Speaker 1>to say his daughter's got good tits and his youngest

0:10:16.567 --> 0:10:17.447
<v Speaker 1>son's really tall.

0:10:17.527 --> 0:10:20.007
<v Speaker 3>Are you maligning what he said. I don't think he

0:10:20.047 --> 0:10:21.727
<v Speaker 3>said that she had good tits. I think he said

0:10:21.727 --> 0:10:25.927
<v Speaker 3>he would not mind sleeping with her. Oh sorry, I

0:10:26.287 --> 0:10:28.007
<v Speaker 3>have also misrepresented Trump.

0:10:28.167 --> 0:10:32.407
<v Speaker 1>So I think it's interesting these contrasting because Tim Walls,

0:10:32.527 --> 0:10:34.607
<v Speaker 1>he didn't expect to be vice president, right, He's not

0:10:34.687 --> 0:10:37.447
<v Speaker 1>like I've been waiting for this. He got the call

0:10:37.647 --> 0:10:41.287
<v Speaker 1>from the bench pretty unexpectedly two weeks after he came

0:10:41.287 --> 0:10:43.527
<v Speaker 1>out and had this amazing cut through by the weird comment,

0:10:44.087 --> 0:10:47.767
<v Speaker 1>And so he's been visibly moved by the big crowds,

0:10:47.927 --> 0:10:50.807
<v Speaker 1>by the reception, by the people chanting coach, coach, coach.

0:10:51.447 --> 0:10:54.687
<v Speaker 1>We've seen I think a degree of emotional intelligence, not

0:10:54.767 --> 0:10:58.607
<v Speaker 1>just from Gus Walls, who I think has been emblematic

0:10:58.647 --> 0:11:03.007
<v Speaker 1>of something, but this idea that men can not just

0:11:03.647 --> 0:11:06.647
<v Speaker 1>get emotional, but also that they can respect women, that

0:11:06.687 --> 0:11:08.807
<v Speaker 1>they can fight for the rights of women, and that

0:11:08.807 --> 0:11:11.487
<v Speaker 1>the be able to have control over their own bodies,

0:11:11.567 --> 0:11:14.927
<v Speaker 1>and that idea of contrasted with Donald Trump, which is

0:11:14.967 --> 0:11:19.127
<v Speaker 1>this cruel, what I would call toxic masculinity, which is

0:11:19.167 --> 0:11:23.327
<v Speaker 1>about mocking people, being cruel to people, being very sort

0:11:23.327 --> 0:11:27.447
<v Speaker 1>of thrusting and aggressive, and then JD Vance, which is

0:11:27.487 --> 0:11:32.607
<v Speaker 1>about oppressing women and being really malevolent and wanting to

0:11:32.647 --> 0:11:36.207
<v Speaker 1>wind the clock back for women. That type of masculinity.

0:11:36.367 --> 0:11:41.007
<v Speaker 3>I've heard Tim Waltz's masculinity described as tonic masculinity as

0:11:41.047 --> 0:11:46.087
<v Speaker 3>sort of the opposite to toxic. And what's so refreshing

0:11:46.127 --> 0:11:49.487
<v Speaker 3>about it is that it is still a vision of masculinity.

0:11:49.527 --> 0:11:52.167
<v Speaker 3>It's not effeminate. And this is what I think the

0:11:52.167 --> 0:11:54.367
<v Speaker 3>Republicans have set it up, that it's like we are

0:11:54.487 --> 0:11:56.687
<v Speaker 3>losing what it is to be a man. Tim Wiltz

0:11:56.767 --> 0:11:57.127
<v Speaker 3>is a man.

0:11:57.607 --> 0:12:00.207
<v Speaker 1>He's still who introduced Tim Wells at the convention, a

0:12:00.287 --> 0:12:03.767
<v Speaker 1>whole bunch of football players who he'd coached. And what's

0:12:03.767 --> 0:12:06.007
<v Speaker 1>so interesting about his time as a football coach is

0:12:06.047 --> 0:12:08.527
<v Speaker 1>that the kids at the school where he was working,

0:12:08.887 --> 0:12:11.887
<v Speaker 1>some of the queer kids, had been bullied and harassed.

0:12:12.247 --> 0:12:15.007
<v Speaker 1>He enlisted all the young men on his football team

0:12:15.487 --> 0:12:19.487
<v Speaker 1>to protect them and to stand between bullies and these guys,

0:12:19.567 --> 0:12:21.887
<v Speaker 1>and I mean that is a new model.

0:12:21.967 --> 0:12:25.167
<v Speaker 3>It's sort of the definition of inspiring. And the other

0:12:25.207 --> 0:12:27.767
<v Speaker 3>thing that's refreshing is that all of us have Tim

0:12:27.807 --> 0:12:30.367
<v Speaker 3>Wlson's in our life, and it's been really difficult to

0:12:30.447 --> 0:12:34.607
<v Speaker 3>describe this healthy masculinity that exists. And maybe Tim walsall

0:12:34.687 --> 0:12:37.927
<v Speaker 3>fix your car and dougs and yeah, exactly right. They

0:12:38.607 --> 0:12:42.087
<v Speaker 3>do see themselves as fathers and husbands and all of

0:12:42.127 --> 0:12:47.007
<v Speaker 3>those things, but it doesn't rely on the oppression of women.

0:12:47.207 --> 0:12:50.447
<v Speaker 1>They're protective without being controlling. Controlling.

0:12:50.567 --> 0:12:53.407
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, they seem to like all the people on all

0:12:53.447 --> 0:12:55.567
<v Speaker 2>the very long list of impressive men who stood up

0:12:55.607 --> 0:12:58.407
<v Speaker 2>and spoke at that that none of them were threatened

0:12:58.847 --> 0:13:00.607
<v Speaker 2>by the powerful females in their lives, or at least

0:13:00.647 --> 0:13:02.687
<v Speaker 2>it seemed that way. But Jesse, I want to ask you,

0:13:03.367 --> 0:13:06.407
<v Speaker 2>is the fact that everybody's so excited about the fact

0:13:06.447 --> 0:13:09.487
<v Speaker 2>that Tim Waltz appears to it like his family. It's

0:13:09.527 --> 0:13:11.407
<v Speaker 2>like a little bit table steakes.

0:13:11.727 --> 0:13:13.367
<v Speaker 3>Most people like their families.

0:13:13.567 --> 0:13:17.607
<v Speaker 2>And also hasn't family values always belong to the right right,

0:13:17.647 --> 0:13:19.927
<v Speaker 2>So what we're seeing is it being reclaimed by the left.

0:13:20.407 --> 0:13:24.007
<v Speaker 2>But also it's kind of hilarious that people might be

0:13:24.007 --> 0:13:24.847
<v Speaker 2>surprised by that.

0:13:25.207 --> 0:13:29.447
<v Speaker 3>The irony I think is that the Republican convention talked

0:13:29.487 --> 0:13:33.087
<v Speaker 3>a lot about families, but at the Democratic Convention, we

0:13:33.327 --> 0:13:35.727
<v Speaker 3>saw a lot of families. And that's the difference. It's like,

0:13:35.767 --> 0:13:38.607
<v Speaker 3>show don't Tell. In all the yelling about abortion and

0:13:38.607 --> 0:13:40.767
<v Speaker 3>contraception and all of that that's been done, and the

0:13:40.847 --> 0:13:43.967
<v Speaker 3>JD vance and the trump of it all, I keep thinking.

0:13:44.087 --> 0:13:48.287
<v Speaker 3>I think in that same Republican image of masculinity is

0:13:48.407 --> 0:13:52.487
<v Speaker 3>the elon Musks who have a thousand children that they

0:13:52.567 --> 0:13:56.247
<v Speaker 3>don't spend any time with, and it's because they believe

0:13:56.287 --> 0:13:59.887
<v Speaker 3>that the world needs more children or whatever. White children, yes, exactly,

0:14:00.847 --> 0:14:06.847
<v Speaker 3>but with tim to actually see a family that loved

0:14:06.887 --> 0:14:10.567
<v Speaker 3>each other and to see that express I think the

0:14:11.127 --> 0:14:16.087
<v Speaker 3>neurodivergent element of this is really important. And everyone had

0:14:16.127 --> 0:14:18.487
<v Speaker 3>someone in their lives who is neurodivergent. Everyone that is

0:14:18.567 --> 0:14:24.167
<v Speaker 3>not represented in the mainstream with politics, with conventions, with elections,

0:14:24.207 --> 0:14:29.127
<v Speaker 3>it is so contrived, it is so performative. So to

0:14:29.287 --> 0:14:32.847
<v Speaker 3>see a the word authentic is overused, but there was

0:14:33.007 --> 0:14:38.687
<v Speaker 3>nothing preempted about that response. It was so pure that

0:14:38.687 --> 0:14:40.327
<v Speaker 3>that's why everyone leaned into it.

0:14:40.607 --> 0:14:43.087
<v Speaker 2>You know what, I loved about it. I can't understand

0:14:43.167 --> 0:14:47.327
<v Speaker 2>the attacks, Like I just don't understand having a mind

0:14:47.407 --> 0:14:51.047
<v Speaker 2>that closed that you would not think that a Gus

0:14:51.047 --> 0:14:54.487
<v Speaker 2>Waltz is not like a wonderful gift to have in

0:14:54.527 --> 0:14:57.327
<v Speaker 2>your family. But also it would have been a big

0:14:57.367 --> 0:15:01.687
<v Speaker 2>decision for Gwen and Tim to have Gos at that event,

0:15:02.287 --> 0:15:04.607
<v Speaker 2>not that he has been in any way sheltered or

0:15:04.807 --> 0:15:07.007
<v Speaker 2>like Tim Wells has spoken about Gus before, he's very

0:15:07.007 --> 0:15:10.567
<v Speaker 2>proud of his family, He's relatively po but that is

0:15:10.567 --> 0:15:13.367
<v Speaker 2>a level of attention that is hard for any of

0:15:13.447 --> 0:15:17.007
<v Speaker 2>us to comprehend. And what I particularly liked about it

0:15:17.047 --> 0:15:18.687
<v Speaker 2>is they would have known that Gus was going to

0:15:18.727 --> 0:15:21.207
<v Speaker 2>react in an excited way in the way that he did.

0:15:21.247 --> 0:15:24.527
<v Speaker 2>To an extent, no one was trying to like shush him,

0:15:24.967 --> 0:15:28.727
<v Speaker 2>make him sit down, like be smaller, be quiet, be less,

0:15:28.887 --> 0:15:31.687
<v Speaker 2>like Hope and Gwen were barely looking at him, you

0:15:31.767 --> 0:15:33.487
<v Speaker 2>know what I mean. They were looking at Tim on

0:15:33.527 --> 0:15:35.407
<v Speaker 2>the stage, support him for his big moment, like it

0:15:35.447 --> 0:15:38.047
<v Speaker 2>was just a very natural family moment. But it would

0:15:38.087 --> 0:15:42.447
<v Speaker 2>have taken some balls to do, because nothing happens on

0:15:42.527 --> 0:15:46.087
<v Speaker 2>that kind of stage without the nth degree of stage management.

0:15:46.127 --> 0:15:47.687
<v Speaker 2>Do you know what I mean, And it was really

0:15:47.807 --> 0:15:49.727
<v Speaker 2>I just loved that that that was there.

0:15:49.927 --> 0:15:52.567
<v Speaker 3>I agree, and that was one element they couldn't control,

0:15:52.607 --> 0:15:55.007
<v Speaker 3>and to watch that none of them were trying to

0:15:55.087 --> 0:15:56.607
<v Speaker 3>suggest that he sit down, and it would have just

0:15:56.647 --> 0:15:59.687
<v Speaker 3>been in a sense of protection for him. But I

0:15:59.767 --> 0:16:02.527
<v Speaker 3>also think that we're used to a narrative, even though

0:16:02.527 --> 0:16:05.127
<v Speaker 3>we we think we've moved past it, that to have

0:16:05.167 --> 0:16:07.567
<v Speaker 3>a child with any sort of disability or any sort

0:16:07.567 --> 0:16:10.567
<v Speaker 3>of difference is a tragedy, is something that we're fed

0:16:10.607 --> 0:16:14.847
<v Speaker 3>and that it makes your life harder, and that I

0:16:14.887 --> 0:16:18.127
<v Speaker 3>don't know, the love is different, but and that it's

0:16:18.127 --> 0:16:20.567
<v Speaker 3>something to be hidden, and that it's embarrassed. Yes, But

0:16:20.727 --> 0:16:23.367
<v Speaker 3>for him, the sentence that tim Oltz said before his

0:16:23.447 --> 0:16:26.327
<v Speaker 3>son said that's my dad is you are my entire

0:16:26.367 --> 0:16:29.047
<v Speaker 3>world and I love you. About his family, there was

0:16:29.087 --> 0:16:31.327
<v Speaker 3>no whiffs, there was no butts, there was no reference

0:16:31.407 --> 0:16:35.727
<v Speaker 3>to the fact that his son was neurodivergent. That was

0:16:35.767 --> 0:16:39.007
<v Speaker 3>a representation you don't see very often, just untridled.

0:16:39.287 --> 0:16:42.247
<v Speaker 1>I see it in your family, you know. It reminded

0:16:42.287 --> 0:16:44.607
<v Speaker 1>me so much of the way your family are, with

0:16:45.167 --> 0:16:49.047
<v Speaker 1>your cousin Simon and your aunt Michelle. This sounds so obvious,

0:16:49.087 --> 0:16:53.807
<v Speaker 1>but by treating people without kid gloves and just being

0:16:53.847 --> 0:16:57.967
<v Speaker 1>around them publicly and not making a big deal, you

0:16:58.007 --> 0:17:01.247
<v Speaker 1>give them such dignity to just be themselves. What you

0:17:01.287 --> 0:17:03.287
<v Speaker 1>said whole is so true. They weren't trying to make

0:17:03.367 --> 0:17:05.167
<v Speaker 1>him smaller. They weren't trying to make him conform. They

0:17:05.167 --> 0:17:06.807
<v Speaker 1>weren't trying to make him be in a box of

0:17:06.847 --> 0:17:10.527
<v Speaker 1>what you should be. And to me, this idea of

0:17:10.567 --> 0:17:14.407
<v Speaker 1>freedom which the Democratic Party is trying to harness, the

0:17:14.487 --> 0:17:18.087
<v Speaker 1>word freedom, it's a very beautiful thing and it's being

0:17:18.327 --> 0:17:21.847
<v Speaker 1>shown in all these different ways. And back to family,

0:17:22.207 --> 0:17:24.367
<v Speaker 1>I think that the other thing that was really notable

0:17:24.607 --> 0:17:27.927
<v Speaker 1>is Kamala Harris is in a blended family. She has

0:17:28.007 --> 0:17:31.807
<v Speaker 1>two step kids who are adults, and they were there.

0:17:32.087 --> 0:17:36.487
<v Speaker 1>And the other person who just looked incredibly moved and happy,

0:17:36.527 --> 0:17:38.327
<v Speaker 1>who I couldn't take my eyes off in her speech,

0:17:38.327 --> 0:17:41.007
<v Speaker 1>she's her stepdaughter, Ella, who was in the glasses and

0:17:41.127 --> 0:17:44.687
<v Speaker 1>was wearing that amazing ball gown. She's very cool and

0:17:44.767 --> 0:17:46.447
<v Speaker 1>she was next to her dad, and they all came

0:17:46.487 --> 0:17:48.687
<v Speaker 1>on the stage afterwards. And I don't know if you

0:17:48.727 --> 0:17:52.687
<v Speaker 1>saw many of the images from the Republican Convention, but

0:17:53.327 --> 0:17:54.927
<v Speaker 1>when you said at the beginning, hohole, I don't know

0:17:54.967 --> 0:17:57.887
<v Speaker 1>why we're talking about what they're wearing. It is actually

0:17:57.927 --> 0:18:01.487
<v Speaker 1>really important what politicians wear because they do send messages.

0:18:01.527 --> 0:18:03.367
<v Speaker 1>Whether we like it or not. We live in a

0:18:03.447 --> 0:18:06.767
<v Speaker 1>visual world. People do send messages with their clothes in

0:18:06.807 --> 0:18:09.127
<v Speaker 1>the same way that royals do, right, particularly people who

0:18:09.327 --> 0:18:11.607
<v Speaker 1>might not speak freely. And if you looked at the

0:18:11.847 --> 0:18:17.727
<v Speaker 1>esthetics of the Republican Convention, it was all women who

0:18:17.887 --> 0:18:21.127
<v Speaker 1>looked like I'm going to say fembots, a highly surgery,

0:18:21.687 --> 0:18:25.487
<v Speaker 1>had this big hair, tight dresses, sky high heels, and

0:18:25.887 --> 0:18:28.167
<v Speaker 1>there's nothing wrong with that look. But when every woman

0:18:28.207 --> 0:18:32.047
<v Speaker 1>on the stage looks the same like a Fox News

0:18:32.087 --> 0:18:37.207
<v Speaker 1>female newsreader, that makes me feel nervous. That has power

0:18:37.287 --> 0:18:41.487
<v Speaker 1>in saying, this is what we believe women should be

0:18:41.807 --> 0:18:45.167
<v Speaker 1>and what women should look like, and this idea of

0:18:45.327 --> 0:18:47.527
<v Speaker 1>our idea about women is that they are a threash.

0:18:47.807 --> 0:18:50.847
<v Speaker 1>They need to be an ornament, and they need to

0:18:50.847 --> 0:18:52.927
<v Speaker 1>be controlled by taking away their rights.

0:18:53.047 --> 0:18:55.807
<v Speaker 3>The best commentary I've been hearing about the US election

0:18:55.847 --> 0:18:58.607
<v Speaker 3>has been from Ezra Kleine. I recommend listening to Ezra

0:18:58.687 --> 0:19:01.087
<v Speaker 3>Klein at the moment. He's just on fire. But he

0:19:01.207 --> 0:19:03.527
<v Speaker 3>said that every election, if you look back, it's about

0:19:03.527 --> 0:19:07.367
<v Speaker 3>one issue, and that this election is about gender. You

0:19:07.407 --> 0:19:10.887
<v Speaker 3>look at abortion, and that's obvious on the agenda. But

0:19:11.367 --> 0:19:13.607
<v Speaker 3>for him, he was like, no, no, no, this is about

0:19:13.607 --> 0:19:17.487
<v Speaker 3>masculinity and different ways in which it's manifesting. So he

0:19:17.647 --> 0:19:20.487
<v Speaker 3>was saying that you've got the Tim Waltz, and he

0:19:20.567 --> 0:19:24.767
<v Speaker 3>actually dissected the differences in the masculinity between Trump and JD. Vance.

0:19:24.967 --> 0:19:28.207
<v Speaker 4>In Donald Trump and in Tim Walls, you have two

0:19:28.567 --> 0:19:33.927
<v Speaker 4>very different but very explicit archetypes visions of what it

0:19:33.967 --> 0:19:36.807
<v Speaker 4>means to be a man. Trump's pitch is built on

0:19:37.767 --> 0:19:41.127
<v Speaker 4>I would call it an almost cartoonish overperformance of masculinity,

0:19:41.327 --> 0:19:44.447
<v Speaker 4>which is aimed at alienated young men. I mean, having

0:19:44.567 --> 0:19:47.647
<v Speaker 4>Hulk Hogan and the head of the UFC on your

0:19:47.767 --> 0:19:50.767
<v Speaker 4>night at the convention really puts a sharp point on that.

0:19:51.647 --> 0:19:55.127
<v Speaker 4>But in Tim Walls, Democrats have found their own version

0:19:55.287 --> 0:19:59.687
<v Speaker 4>of a male archetype. A football coach, a soldier, a

0:19:59.727 --> 0:20:03.127
<v Speaker 4>guy who will fix your car, but also an ally,

0:20:03.487 --> 0:20:06.287
<v Speaker 4>a man comfortable being in the role of supporting women,

0:20:06.647 --> 0:20:10.487
<v Speaker 4>a man unthreatened by social change, a man even excited

0:20:10.527 --> 0:20:10.927
<v Speaker 4>by it.

0:20:11.087 --> 0:20:16.207
<v Speaker 3>Because they're both responses to this underground rejection of feminism

0:20:16.447 --> 0:20:20.047
<v Speaker 3>that the Andrew tates that the younger generations are going

0:20:20.087 --> 0:20:21.327
<v Speaker 3>feminism has threatened us.

0:20:21.367 --> 0:20:24.047
<v Speaker 1>It's a real clap back to the or a pushback

0:20:24.127 --> 0:20:26.967
<v Speaker 1>against the way Hillary Clinton ran and her idea of

0:20:27.087 --> 0:20:30.447
<v Speaker 1>I'm with her glass ceiling. I agree. I loved what

0:20:30.567 --> 0:20:31.447
<v Speaker 1>Ezra Klin said.

0:20:31.647 --> 0:20:34.167
<v Speaker 2>I love it. But again, I'm just gonna throw it

0:20:34.207 --> 0:20:39.207
<v Speaker 2>in there. Low bar man has to think woman should

0:20:39.207 --> 0:20:41.967
<v Speaker 2>be allowed to have a job and seem to be

0:20:42.007 --> 0:20:44.007
<v Speaker 2>interested in his children and know their names.

0:20:44.687 --> 0:20:47.727
<v Speaker 1>But I love guys. But that's what's been so crazy

0:20:47.767 --> 0:20:50.487
<v Speaker 1>about the last ten years, if for anyone who's been

0:20:50.487 --> 0:20:52.767
<v Speaker 1>following American politics, and how can you not, because you've

0:20:52.807 --> 0:20:54.887
<v Speaker 1>got a man who says I'm going to grab her

0:20:54.887 --> 0:20:56.607
<v Speaker 1>by the pussy and he is elected.

0:20:56.887 --> 0:20:59.607
<v Speaker 2>I agree, and I loved like Doug's speech made me

0:20:59.687 --> 0:21:02.767
<v Speaker 2>so happy, And I love the confidence and joy that

0:21:02.847 --> 0:21:05.287
<v Speaker 2>he carries with him in the role of being like

0:21:06.007 --> 0:21:09.367
<v Speaker 2>second gentleman and possibly the first gentleman. Apparently he has

0:21:09.407 --> 0:21:14.007
<v Speaker 2>like second gentleman on his mugs, like he fully embraces it,

0:21:14.167 --> 0:21:16.687
<v Speaker 2>and apparently he's right there with Kamala like making the calls,

0:21:16.687 --> 0:21:18.647
<v Speaker 2>getting it like They are clearly a very tight unit,

0:21:18.647 --> 0:21:21.207
<v Speaker 2>and I love to see it. But I'm also always

0:21:21.247 --> 0:21:23.247
<v Speaker 2>just a little bit like, gosh, we really don't expect

0:21:23.287 --> 0:21:24.607
<v Speaker 2>much from the chaps, do we look?

0:21:24.647 --> 0:21:27.447
<v Speaker 3>I agree, and looking at the Trump example, he had

0:21:27.487 --> 0:21:31.407
<v Speaker 3>Hulk Hogan at the Republican convention, like, there's a representation,

0:21:31.487 --> 0:21:33.607
<v Speaker 3>and you were talking about a caulter. But there was

0:21:33.647 --> 0:21:36.447
<v Speaker 3>another tweet by a guy named Mike Crispy, who is

0:21:36.487 --> 0:21:40.767
<v Speaker 3>like a reporter, TV host, maga person, and he said

0:21:40.847 --> 0:21:44.167
<v Speaker 3>Tim Waltz's stupid crying son. Isn't the flex the left

0:21:44.207 --> 0:21:46.887
<v Speaker 3>think it is? You raised your kid to be a puffy,

0:21:46.927 --> 0:21:51.287
<v Speaker 3>beta male congrat. Does Baron Trump cry? Nope? Does he

0:21:51.367 --> 0:21:54.527
<v Speaker 3>love his father? Of course? That's the types of values

0:21:54.567 --> 0:21:57.527
<v Speaker 3>I want leading the country. What's telling about that is

0:21:57.567 --> 0:22:00.247
<v Speaker 3>the use of the word beta, because I think that

0:22:00.647 --> 0:22:03.247
<v Speaker 3>the Republicans have thought that the only model of masculinity

0:22:03.327 --> 0:22:06.687
<v Speaker 3>is alpha, and the Democrats are saying the opposite to that.

0:22:06.767 --> 0:22:10.247
<v Speaker 3>Isn't beta. It's just this diverse representation and the.

0:22:10.207 --> 0:22:13.527
<v Speaker 2>World isn't that simple? Guys? And ohso Baron Trump probably

0:22:13.527 --> 0:22:17.567
<v Speaker 2>barely those who his days. Does he cry every night

0:22:17.727 --> 0:22:18.727
<v Speaker 2>himself to sleep?

0:22:21.247 --> 0:22:27.087
<v Speaker 1>You are my Empire World and I love you. As

0:22:27.127 --> 0:22:29.487
<v Speaker 1>of today, there are new rules for work and they

0:22:29.527 --> 0:22:32.127
<v Speaker 1>affect anyone who has a boss or is a boss.

0:22:32.767 --> 0:22:36.127
<v Speaker 1>From today, you will be legally able to clock off

0:22:36.127 --> 0:22:39.127
<v Speaker 1>from work without having to be available after hours. It's

0:22:39.167 --> 0:22:41.847
<v Speaker 1>called the right to disconnect law, and you may have

0:22:41.887 --> 0:22:44.727
<v Speaker 1>seen people freaking out about it, bosses complaining that they

0:22:44.727 --> 0:22:47.527
<v Speaker 1>can't send an email at five point fifteen PM, or

0:22:47.607 --> 0:22:50.527
<v Speaker 1>employees complaining that one time their boss rang them while

0:22:50.527 --> 0:22:52.207
<v Speaker 1>they were giving birth to ask if they'd mark the

0:22:52.247 --> 0:22:56.487
<v Speaker 1>exams for their class. So what's going on, really? I

0:22:56.487 --> 0:22:59.047
<v Speaker 1>think we can all agree that's a bit unreasonable, unless,

0:22:59.087 --> 0:23:01.807
<v Speaker 1>of course the boss didn't know that she was giving

0:23:01.807 --> 0:23:02.647
<v Speaker 1>birth at that time.

0:23:02.767 --> 0:23:05.007
<v Speaker 3>You messaged me a lot during my labor, but in

0:23:05.047 --> 0:23:06.847
<v Speaker 3>your defense, you were emotionally invested.

0:23:07.327 --> 0:23:09.327
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to know what you thought of my fringe.

0:23:10.007 --> 0:23:14.607
<v Speaker 1>From today, in businesses with more than fifteen employees, workers

0:23:14.607 --> 0:23:17.927
<v Speaker 1>will have the right to refuse contact outside their working hours,

0:23:17.967 --> 0:23:22.807
<v Speaker 1>including calls and emails, unless that refusal is unreasonable. Now.

0:23:22.847 --> 0:23:26.647
<v Speaker 1>Brent Ferguson, who is the head of an employer group

0:23:26.767 --> 0:23:30.207
<v Speaker 1>called AI Group, explained that these new laws won't bring

0:23:30.247 --> 0:23:33.367
<v Speaker 1>an end to late night calls. He said, it's a

0:23:33.407 --> 0:23:37.047
<v Speaker 1>new right for an employee to refuse that contact, to

0:23:37.167 --> 0:23:39.407
<v Speaker 1>refuse to monitor their emails, or to refuse to take

0:23:39.447 --> 0:23:42.847
<v Speaker 1>a telephone call from their employer if it's outside their

0:23:42.887 --> 0:23:46.967
<v Speaker 1>working hours. So emails and calls, it's got to be reasonable,

0:23:47.447 --> 0:23:49.647
<v Speaker 1>but you have got the right not to respond.

0:23:49.887 --> 0:23:51.447
<v Speaker 3>Did you know that it also doesn't apply to you

0:23:51.487 --> 0:23:53.967
<v Speaker 3>if you earn over one hundred and seventy five thousand

0:23:54.007 --> 0:23:54.487
<v Speaker 3>dollars a year.

0:23:54.567 --> 0:23:54.887
<v Speaker 2>I did.

0:23:54.927 --> 0:23:56.047
<v Speaker 3>I found that in the fine Brint.

0:23:56.127 --> 0:23:59.087
<v Speaker 1>What's going to happen though, is in August next year

0:23:59.207 --> 0:24:01.967
<v Speaker 1>this will apply to all businesses, including small businesses where

0:24:01.967 --> 0:24:05.767
<v Speaker 1>there's less than fifteen employees, unless the Coalition win the

0:24:05.767 --> 0:24:08.767
<v Speaker 1>election in May, because Peter Dutton has said they will

0:24:08.767 --> 0:24:11.727
<v Speaker 1>repeal this law. Why because he says it's very bad

0:24:12.167 --> 0:24:16.767
<v Speaker 1>for employers. Now more than twenty countries have similar laws

0:24:16.807 --> 0:24:19.447
<v Speaker 1>in place, and research has found that it improved well

0:24:19.447 --> 0:24:23.167
<v Speaker 1>being and work satisfaction in any companies with these right

0:24:23.247 --> 0:24:27.807
<v Speaker 1>to disconnect policies. Holly doesn't seem reasonable when I text

0:24:27.807 --> 0:24:29.727
<v Speaker 1>you at six am to tell you that Jalo has

0:24:29.767 --> 0:24:33.047
<v Speaker 1>filed for divorce and will you be blocking me from

0:24:33.087 --> 0:24:33.847
<v Speaker 1>the grip chat.

0:24:35.247 --> 0:24:37.327
<v Speaker 2>You've just horrified me by telling me there's an election

0:24:37.447 --> 0:24:40.487
<v Speaker 2>in May. I'm not ready for that now. Anyway, back

0:24:40.487 --> 0:24:43.487
<v Speaker 2>to your question, is it unreasonable, No, it's not unreasonable.

0:24:44.167 --> 0:24:46.767
<v Speaker 2>I think these laws are great. I do. I think

0:24:46.807 --> 0:24:49.847
<v Speaker 2>that it's a correction because basically what's happened over the

0:24:49.887 --> 0:24:52.687
<v Speaker 2>past ten years is there's been a creep, right, there's

0:24:52.687 --> 0:24:55.007
<v Speaker 2>been a creep into all kinds of workplaces where it's

0:24:55.007 --> 0:24:57.647
<v Speaker 2>not essential or urgent that you answer the boss's message

0:24:57.687 --> 0:25:00.087
<v Speaker 2>in that very moment that they send it. But they can,

0:25:00.887 --> 0:25:03.287
<v Speaker 2>and very often you feel pressure to. And when I

0:25:03.327 --> 0:25:05.327
<v Speaker 2>say you, I don't mean me, I mean people in

0:25:05.367 --> 0:25:08.607
<v Speaker 2>the world. So it's kind of normal and expected now

0:25:08.687 --> 0:25:10.487
<v Speaker 2>that if you're we'll sends you an email or a

0:25:10.527 --> 0:25:14.167
<v Speaker 2>group taxst or whatever your mode of communication is that

0:25:14.407 --> 0:25:16.207
<v Speaker 2>it's a sign of how invested in how much you

0:25:16.327 --> 0:25:18.287
<v Speaker 2>like your job, whether or not you answer it at

0:25:18.367 --> 0:25:20.927
<v Speaker 2>nine o'clock at night. But what this is saying is

0:25:21.207 --> 0:25:23.487
<v Speaker 2>if your boss is messaging you at nine o'clock at night,

0:25:23.567 --> 0:25:25.807
<v Speaker 2>you don't have to answer it, and you can't be

0:25:25.927 --> 0:25:31.127
<v Speaker 2>punished for not answering it. But if it's urgent, they can't. Right,

0:25:31.247 --> 0:25:33.367
<v Speaker 2>So we work in the media. It's very different. It's

0:25:33.367 --> 0:25:36.567
<v Speaker 2>hard to switch it off. So the queen dies at.

0:25:36.447 --> 0:25:38.327
<v Speaker 1>She didn't do it during business. She didn't do it

0:25:38.367 --> 0:25:40.447
<v Speaker 1>during business, Now sign with Matthew Perry. The queen dies

0:25:40.447 --> 0:25:42.967
<v Speaker 1>in the middle of the night. Is it reasonable that

0:25:43.287 --> 0:25:46.167
<v Speaker 1>the owner of a business or your superior in a

0:25:46.207 --> 0:25:48.487
<v Speaker 1>media business gets online and says, hey, hey, hey, who's up.

0:25:48.487 --> 0:25:49.887
<v Speaker 1>We've got to do the queen or whatever.

0:25:50.207 --> 0:25:52.487
<v Speaker 2>Yes it is. I don't think that this would apply

0:25:53.047 --> 0:25:55.807
<v Speaker 2>that it wouldn't be reasonable. But should you have to

0:25:55.847 --> 0:25:57.847
<v Speaker 2>answer your message from your boss who's just going at

0:25:57.847 --> 0:25:59.567
<v Speaker 2>ten o'clock at night because they've caught up on their

0:25:59.607 --> 0:26:01.767
<v Speaker 2>emails and they're going, hey, you know that thing we

0:26:01.887 --> 0:26:04.847
<v Speaker 2>talked about for that thing next week? You know we

0:26:04.887 --> 0:26:07.687
<v Speaker 2>should do blah blah blah. That's the message you're allowed

0:26:07.687 --> 0:26:08.447
<v Speaker 2>to ignore, right.

0:26:08.527 --> 0:26:11.607
<v Speaker 3>I agree with the Holy completely and I really like

0:26:11.687 --> 0:26:15.167
<v Speaker 3>these laws. And it's probably worth noting that there are

0:26:15.207 --> 0:26:17.247
<v Speaker 3>a lot of details that haven't been ironed out. They're

0:26:17.247 --> 0:26:19.207
<v Speaker 3>actually going to wait to see what happens and what

0:26:19.247 --> 0:26:23.087
<v Speaker 3>discussions take place in workplaces to get all the regulations perfected.

0:26:23.167 --> 0:26:25.487
<v Speaker 1>Because the first thing you said, Holly, when we talked

0:26:25.527 --> 0:26:28.807
<v Speaker 1>about this this morning was what's the definition of reasonable

0:26:28.887 --> 0:26:32.287
<v Speaker 1>Because the employer and the employee might have very different definitions.

0:26:32.687 --> 0:26:36.127
<v Speaker 1>This feels a little bit unhelpful. The Fair Work Commission

0:26:36.447 --> 0:26:40.567
<v Speaker 1>is going to provide guidelines around this, but it's so

0:26:40.687 --> 0:26:42.647
<v Speaker 1>far said it's not going to do so until people

0:26:42.687 --> 0:26:45.407
<v Speaker 1>start complaining, and then they're going to use real world

0:26:45.447 --> 0:26:48.247
<v Speaker 1>examples to help form those guidelines. So it's a bit

0:26:48.287 --> 0:26:49.247
<v Speaker 1>wild West at the moment.

0:26:49.607 --> 0:26:52.807
<v Speaker 3>The issue that I foresee is that if you are

0:26:53.527 --> 0:26:55.807
<v Speaker 3>someone who's earning over one hundred and seventy five thousand dollars,

0:26:55.847 --> 0:26:58.847
<v Speaker 3>it's not applied to you this right to disconnect thing.

0:26:59.407 --> 0:27:02.047
<v Speaker 3>It's often that person who's reaching out to the twenty

0:27:02.047 --> 0:27:04.447
<v Speaker 3>two year old who is on a way less salary.

0:27:04.967 --> 0:27:08.887
<v Speaker 3>In that way, it takes someone very boundaried and someone

0:27:08.927 --> 0:27:12.367
<v Speaker 3>with a bit willpower to ignore it. My dream is

0:27:12.367 --> 0:27:14.567
<v Speaker 3>that I could walk into my house and have a

0:27:14.607 --> 0:27:16.527
<v Speaker 3>box that I could lock, and my phone would go

0:27:16.647 --> 0:27:19.407
<v Speaker 3>in there, and I would ignore it until I put

0:27:19.407 --> 0:27:21.167
<v Speaker 3>my baby to sleep, so two or three hours that

0:27:21.207 --> 0:27:21.647
<v Speaker 3>would be.

0:27:21.687 --> 0:27:22.527
<v Speaker 2>I could do that.

0:27:23.127 --> 0:27:24.287
<v Speaker 3>I could, I could.

0:27:24.447 --> 0:27:27.407
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if I like no offense, Jesse, but

0:27:27.407 --> 0:27:28.527
<v Speaker 2>you're not saving lives.

0:27:28.607 --> 0:27:29.287
<v Speaker 3>I'm not on your own.

0:27:29.407 --> 0:27:33.367
<v Speaker 2>Your role is no longer a news breaking covering role

0:27:33.647 --> 0:27:36.767
<v Speaker 2>on the website. Yeah, it's unlikely there would be an

0:27:36.807 --> 0:27:39.887
<v Speaker 2>out loud emergency that wouldn't need to be addressed in

0:27:39.967 --> 0:27:43.687
<v Speaker 2>that moment between the hours of five and seven pm.

0:27:43.807 --> 0:27:46.967
<v Speaker 1>But the problem is, and this is why laws like

0:27:47.007 --> 0:27:50.407
<v Speaker 1>this are relevant, the place where we get our work

0:27:50.407 --> 0:27:53.687
<v Speaker 1>communication is also the place where we get communication from

0:27:53.727 --> 0:27:57.007
<v Speaker 1>our families, our friends about our social life, where we

0:27:57.087 --> 0:27:59.847
<v Speaker 1>do a million things. So it's not like you can say, okay,

0:27:59.887 --> 0:28:02.247
<v Speaker 1>the work parts of my phone I want to put

0:28:02.287 --> 0:28:03.087
<v Speaker 1>in a locked box.

0:28:03.327 --> 0:28:05.367
<v Speaker 3>Yes, I was listening to a podcast over the weekend

0:28:05.447 --> 0:28:07.767
<v Speaker 3>that said, we even know this with food, right. You

0:28:07.807 --> 0:28:10.487
<v Speaker 3>know how you unpack your grocery and you put your

0:28:10.487 --> 0:28:13.127
<v Speaker 3>dessert food and your sweet food in a different place

0:28:13.167 --> 0:28:14.847
<v Speaker 3>you put your bread because you know that when you

0:28:14.887 --> 0:28:16.567
<v Speaker 3>go to get your breakfast food, you only want to

0:28:16.607 --> 0:28:19.767
<v Speaker 3>see what's for breakfast, and like you know, you've got

0:28:19.767 --> 0:28:21.687
<v Speaker 3>your bread plates and then you've got your milk places

0:28:21.687 --> 0:28:23.607
<v Speaker 3>and blah blah blah, like you sought. That's how the

0:28:23.687 --> 0:28:26.127
<v Speaker 3>human brain works. A fine doesn't allow you to sort,

0:28:26.407 --> 0:28:27.127
<v Speaker 3>it's just bombarded.

0:28:27.167 --> 0:28:28.367
<v Speaker 1>It all comes at you at once.

0:28:28.487 --> 0:28:30.167
<v Speaker 3>But I want to play devil's advocate of it. Because

0:28:30.167 --> 0:28:31.887
<v Speaker 3>there was an article that came out in the Sydney

0:28:31.927 --> 0:28:36.407
<v Speaker 3>Morning Herald by Paul o'haleran. The headline was lazy workers

0:28:36.407 --> 0:28:39.407
<v Speaker 3>are licking their lips as the right to disconnect laws

0:28:39.487 --> 0:28:42.967
<v Speaker 3>loom and I hated that headline, but then he made

0:28:42.967 --> 0:28:46.607
<v Speaker 3>some valid points. Let me explain, he's an employment lawyer,

0:28:46.647 --> 0:28:49.567
<v Speaker 3>so he would know, and he said, lazy workers exist

0:28:49.647 --> 0:28:52.407
<v Speaker 3>in every workplace. Can we agree? Of course, of course

0:28:52.407 --> 0:28:54.567
<v Speaker 3>there are lots of lazy workers, and he had a

0:28:54.607 --> 0:28:57.287
<v Speaker 3>bunch of quite funny examples. But he said the concern

0:28:57.527 --> 0:28:59.967
<v Speaker 3>is that it will often new protections to the workers

0:29:00.007 --> 0:29:04.167
<v Speaker 3>who were already idle. And he actually said that laziness

0:29:04.287 --> 0:29:07.567
<v Speaker 3>is becoming in his line of work and increasing trend

0:29:07.647 --> 0:29:10.727
<v Speaker 3>in the case that he's taken on, so things like

0:29:10.967 --> 0:29:14.727
<v Speaker 3>forging time sheets for fabricated hours, fake medical certificates, and

0:29:14.767 --> 0:29:17.607
<v Speaker 3>watching Netflix while claiming to be working from home, sleeping

0:29:17.607 --> 0:29:20.527
<v Speaker 3>on the job. Do we think that if you're a

0:29:20.687 --> 0:29:24.287
<v Speaker 3>lazy worker, you're jumping up and down today, you're pretty excited.

0:29:24.487 --> 0:29:27.087
<v Speaker 1>Well, the thing is that it actually goes both ways.

0:29:27.167 --> 0:29:30.167
<v Speaker 1>So in terms of what fair work can do, if

0:29:30.247 --> 0:29:33.327
<v Speaker 1>you feel that your boss is making unreasonable requests, you

0:29:33.367 --> 0:29:36.127
<v Speaker 1>can go to fair work and get them to adjudicate it.

0:29:36.767 --> 0:29:40.287
<v Speaker 1>If you're a boss who you feel like your worker

0:29:40.527 --> 0:29:44.007
<v Speaker 1>is not replying to reasonable requests, like say if I

0:29:44.087 --> 0:29:47.087
<v Speaker 1>run a cafe and someone's called in sick, and so

0:29:47.167 --> 0:29:50.687
<v Speaker 1>I message everybody to say can anyone work this shift? Again,

0:29:50.767 --> 0:29:53.127
<v Speaker 1>this is not just about once, this is repeatedly. If

0:29:53.207 --> 0:29:56.967
<v Speaker 1>you never respond, then I can say, well, I'm going

0:29:57.047 --> 0:29:58.127
<v Speaker 1>to have to let you go or I'm going to

0:29:58.167 --> 0:30:01.007
<v Speaker 1>go to fair work because you do need to reply. Sometimes.

0:30:01.247 --> 0:30:03.727
<v Speaker 1>It's interesting to read some of the responses from out

0:30:03.767 --> 0:30:06.127
<v Speaker 1>louders when we've asked about this in the past, and

0:30:06.167 --> 0:30:08.247
<v Speaker 1>they say, if you're, for example, a shift worker, if

0:30:08.287 --> 0:30:11.167
<v Speaker 1>you're a nurse or something, you're working casual work, your

0:30:11.207 --> 0:30:14.447
<v Speaker 1>phone can be going twenty four to seven with can

0:30:14.487 --> 0:30:16.447
<v Speaker 1>anyone do this shift? Can anyone do this shift? Can

0:30:16.447 --> 0:30:17.287
<v Speaker 1>anyone do this shift?

0:30:18.007 --> 0:30:18.167
<v Speaker 4>Now?

0:30:18.247 --> 0:30:20.487
<v Speaker 1>Let's also give the benefit of the doubt to the

0:30:20.487 --> 0:30:23.527
<v Speaker 1>person who needs to cover the shift, right And so

0:30:24.007 --> 0:30:26.647
<v Speaker 1>what I've learned, and I learned this lesson early on.

0:30:26.687 --> 0:30:29.287
<v Speaker 1>I've said it on the show before. When you're working

0:30:29.527 --> 0:30:32.047
<v Speaker 1>in an industry that's twenty four seven, and it's really hard.

0:30:32.047 --> 0:30:34.487
<v Speaker 1>And when you're the owner of the business, obviously you

0:30:34.607 --> 0:30:38.207
<v Speaker 1>never get to rest. But then there's also potentially upside

0:30:38.207 --> 0:30:40.247
<v Speaker 1>for you that there aren't for people who work for you.

0:30:40.927 --> 0:30:43.887
<v Speaker 1>But I once got told I can't keep me of

0:30:43.927 --> 0:30:46.967
<v Speaker 1>Friedman's hours anymore, and I can't be in the shower

0:30:47.247 --> 0:30:50.447
<v Speaker 1>worried that she's messaged me. And I've never forgotten that.

0:30:50.447 --> 0:30:52.807
<v Speaker 1>It was quite early in Mamma Maya. The work hours

0:30:52.807 --> 0:30:55.207
<v Speaker 1>work crazy because the internet was crazy. So now I'm

0:30:55.207 --> 0:30:58.807
<v Speaker 1>always very clear because I as a manager and a boss,

0:30:59.367 --> 0:31:01.407
<v Speaker 1>I can't get all my work done in my hours,

0:31:01.407 --> 0:31:04.207
<v Speaker 1>so I will often be working on weekends and after work.

0:31:04.487 --> 0:31:06.847
<v Speaker 1>Now I always make it very clear you do not

0:31:07.007 --> 0:31:10.567
<v Speaker 1>need to respond until it's work out. If it's really important,

0:31:10.887 --> 0:31:13.247
<v Speaker 1>I will text you. But what I don't want to

0:31:13.287 --> 0:31:16.407
<v Speaker 1>be told I can't do is even send the emails. Yeah,

0:31:16.407 --> 0:31:18.767
<v Speaker 1>like if I give you permission to ignore them, if

0:31:18.767 --> 0:31:20.727
<v Speaker 1>the fact that I've sent them is causing you stress

0:31:20.767 --> 0:31:23.727
<v Speaker 1>and you can complain about it, that's tricky. Different if

0:31:23.767 --> 0:31:25.927
<v Speaker 1>it's on your phone, like if I was texting people

0:31:25.967 --> 0:31:27.847
<v Speaker 1>all ours, that would be different. But I only do

0:31:27.887 --> 0:31:28.367
<v Speaker 1>that to you too.

0:31:28.607 --> 0:31:32.407
<v Speaker 2>I think it's interesting because obviously I've managed teams too,

0:31:32.847 --> 0:31:35.047
<v Speaker 2>and you do like the person who will respond to

0:31:35.047 --> 0:31:36.887
<v Speaker 2>you out of ours? You do. If I'm the Queen's

0:31:36.927 --> 0:31:39.727
<v Speaker 2>dead who's around, first person who jumps on and goes yep,

0:31:39.807 --> 0:31:42.447
<v Speaker 2>no problem getting then I'm like, good, nice pattern head,

0:31:42.487 --> 0:31:44.487
<v Speaker 2>like I do, you know. But the thing is is

0:31:44.527 --> 0:31:48.567
<v Speaker 2>that that prejudice to responders to that kind of thing.

0:31:48.687 --> 0:31:50.927
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if that means that you're back to

0:31:50.927 --> 0:31:54.567
<v Speaker 2>the lazy thing. Is our definition of lazy, that you're

0:31:54.647 --> 0:31:58.567
<v Speaker 2>not constantly prioritizing work. No, because I think, like the

0:31:58.607 --> 0:32:01.087
<v Speaker 2>example that you were giving about somebody who is not

0:32:01.167 --> 0:32:04.167
<v Speaker 2>really doing their job, that's another issue that doesn't really

0:32:04.167 --> 0:32:05.927
<v Speaker 2>have anything to do with out of ours or not

0:32:06.127 --> 0:32:09.047
<v Speaker 2>like they should be dealing with that anyway, not because

0:32:09.047 --> 0:32:12.047
<v Speaker 2>of is. Whereas the thing is is that I think

0:32:12.047 --> 0:32:14.727
<v Speaker 2>we've got a culture now, and I certainly have internalized

0:32:14.767 --> 0:32:17.647
<v Speaker 2>this culture, and it's you know for many years. Is

0:32:17.687 --> 0:32:20.367
<v Speaker 2>that if my phone beeps with work and I'm out

0:32:20.367 --> 0:32:22.807
<v Speaker 2>for dinner with friends, if I'm putting the kids to bed,

0:32:22.847 --> 0:32:25.287
<v Speaker 2>if I'm cooking dinner at work, is more important. That's

0:32:25.287 --> 0:32:28.127
<v Speaker 2>the message that the twenty four to seven. Culture gives right,

0:32:28.807 --> 0:32:30.767
<v Speaker 2>and this is trying to redress that a bit, to

0:32:30.807 --> 0:32:33.167
<v Speaker 2>give you permission to go. And I think that you

0:32:33.207 --> 0:32:36.527
<v Speaker 2>know gen Z much better at this yaound Jes boundaries

0:32:36.807 --> 0:32:37.607
<v Speaker 2>is that they're and they.

0:32:37.527 --> 0:32:39.767
<v Speaker 3>Ought to be, because gen Z on average are also

0:32:39.807 --> 0:32:41.567
<v Speaker 3>being paid less because they're less experience.

0:32:41.647 --> 0:32:43.567
<v Speaker 2>But then you'd argue from the other side, you'd go,

0:32:43.607 --> 0:32:45.967
<v Speaker 2>but don't you want to be the one who had

0:32:46.007 --> 0:32:46.807
<v Speaker 2>the advantage.

0:32:46.967 --> 0:32:49.767
<v Speaker 3>The argument about jumping on and the Queen, for example,

0:32:49.967 --> 0:32:51.887
<v Speaker 3>is that and these laws cover this, is that you've

0:32:51.887 --> 0:32:53.567
<v Speaker 3>got to be compensated. So if I jump on and

0:32:53.567 --> 0:32:55.487
<v Speaker 3>do the queen, which we do, and I then work

0:32:55.527 --> 0:32:57.927
<v Speaker 3>two hours, I get two hours off on Monday, and

0:32:57.967 --> 0:32:58.647
<v Speaker 3>that should be the way.

0:32:58.807 --> 0:33:01.487
<v Speaker 2>And also what they're trying to do is say, compensate

0:33:01.527 --> 0:33:04.207
<v Speaker 2>people if you want them to work outside of hours.

0:33:04.247 --> 0:33:06.407
<v Speaker 2>And the idea about the wage cap as in that

0:33:06.487 --> 0:33:08.007
<v Speaker 2>this doesn't apply to you if you earn really good

0:33:08.047 --> 0:33:09.767
<v Speaker 2>money is that that's what you're getting paid good money

0:33:09.807 --> 0:33:13.287
<v Speaker 2>for exactly. So I think that that's all very reasonable.

0:33:13.487 --> 0:33:15.447
<v Speaker 2>But I agree with you Maya that you shouldn't not

0:33:15.847 --> 0:33:17.407
<v Speaker 2>be able to send messages.

0:33:17.927 --> 0:33:21.807
<v Speaker 1>I think what work means has just changed so much

0:33:22.207 --> 0:33:27.327
<v Speaker 1>because I think that everybody's expectations around work, they've been

0:33:27.487 --> 0:33:30.287
<v Speaker 1>so many changes. As you said at the start in

0:33:30.367 --> 0:33:33.047
<v Speaker 1>what work looks like, I mean, now you can potentially

0:33:33.127 --> 0:33:35.007
<v Speaker 1>work from home a lot of people, some people can't,

0:33:35.887 --> 0:33:38.567
<v Speaker 1>the idea of working part time, the idea of working

0:33:39.247 --> 0:33:43.727
<v Speaker 1>flexible hours, the idea of coworking, all of these things,

0:33:43.767 --> 0:33:47.567
<v Speaker 1>and now the right to disconnect and boundaries technology. Work

0:33:47.607 --> 0:33:50.127
<v Speaker 1>has changed so much. You used to go to work

0:33:50.167 --> 0:33:52.127
<v Speaker 1>at a certain time and then you would finish work

0:33:52.127 --> 0:33:54.327
<v Speaker 1>at a certain time and that would be the end.

0:33:54.327 --> 0:33:55.927
<v Speaker 1>You couldn't take work playing with you.

0:33:55.967 --> 0:33:58.327
<v Speaker 3>Really, the element of this that the out loud has

0:33:58.327 --> 0:34:00.847
<v Speaker 3>told us, which I thought was something I hadn't considered,

0:34:01.607 --> 0:34:06.927
<v Speaker 3>is that we're talking about availability, creep and bosses and employees. Actually,

0:34:07.007 --> 0:34:09.567
<v Speaker 3>what a lot about louders are having issues with are

0:34:09.927 --> 0:34:13.487
<v Speaker 3>clients parents. If you're a real estate agent, then the

0:34:13.487 --> 0:34:15.887
<v Speaker 3>people who are contacting you out of hours and expecting

0:34:15.887 --> 0:34:18.967
<v Speaker 3>an immediate response isn't your boss, it's your client or

0:34:19.047 --> 0:34:22.887
<v Speaker 3>teachers are getting cents parents or students. There were out

0:34:22.927 --> 0:34:25.567
<v Speaker 3>louders who said, hang on, my daughter is emailing her

0:34:25.607 --> 0:34:28.127
<v Speaker 3>teacher at eight thirty pm. That teacher should be offline.

0:34:28.167 --> 0:34:31.167
<v Speaker 3>That's true, which I think is it's actually a symptom

0:34:31.207 --> 0:34:34.207
<v Speaker 3>of an entire culture that now expects you to respect a.

0:34:34.247 --> 0:34:35.847
<v Speaker 1>Meeting I do. I mean it used to be that

0:34:35.887 --> 0:34:38.327
<v Speaker 1>working hours were widely understood to be nine to five.

0:34:38.487 --> 0:34:42.447
<v Speaker 1>Right now that everybody like we like flexibility. Some people

0:34:42.487 --> 0:34:44.407
<v Speaker 1>want to work part time, some people want to work

0:34:44.407 --> 0:34:47.007
<v Speaker 1>different hours. Some people want to you know, look after

0:34:47.047 --> 0:34:49.447
<v Speaker 1>their kids in the day and work at night. So

0:34:49.487 --> 0:34:51.967
<v Speaker 1>how do we manage that? Because let's give everybody the

0:34:51.967 --> 0:34:54.447
<v Speaker 1>benefit of the doubt. How am I meant to know

0:34:54.487 --> 0:34:56.927
<v Speaker 1>that you don't work on a Wednesday, and Holly doesn't

0:34:56.967 --> 0:34:59.887
<v Speaker 1>work on a Thursday afternoon, and someone else works at night,

0:34:59.967 --> 0:35:03.887
<v Speaker 1>but not on every second Friday. I think that's what's difficult.

0:35:04.047 --> 0:35:06.127
<v Speaker 3>Yes, but this is an issue with our sense of

0:35:06.167 --> 0:35:09.167
<v Speaker 3>immediacy about things that actually aren't urgent. I realized that

0:35:09.527 --> 0:35:13.047
<v Speaker 3>I start every email with sorry for my delay. Your

0:35:13.367 --> 0:35:15.967
<v Speaker 3>email wasn't actually urgent, and I'm responding two days later.

0:35:16.287 --> 0:35:18.327
<v Speaker 3>I think I need to delete that sentence and just

0:35:18.407 --> 0:35:20.247
<v Speaker 3>go I'll give you the responsible.

0:35:19.887 --> 0:35:21.807
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well, what fair work are saying too. It's about

0:35:21.847 --> 0:35:24.487
<v Speaker 2>setting up the expectation between the employer and the employee,

0:35:24.567 --> 0:35:27.367
<v Speaker 2>right is that I mean, again, media business different, but

0:35:27.487 --> 0:35:30.127
<v Speaker 2>anytime we've ever hired anybody, you sort of make it

0:35:30.207 --> 0:35:32.767
<v Speaker 2>obvious that not to say you will be working around

0:35:32.807 --> 0:35:34.927
<v Speaker 2>the clock, not that at all, but that sometimes things

0:35:34.927 --> 0:35:38.127
<v Speaker 2>will happen and we will expect, you know, xyz. And

0:35:38.167 --> 0:35:41.167
<v Speaker 2>I think there's room in this legislation. It seems that

0:35:41.247 --> 0:35:42.767
<v Speaker 2>way for that kind of give and take and that

0:35:42.847 --> 0:35:46.287
<v Speaker 2>kind of flexibility. But it is interesting because you know,

0:35:46.367 --> 0:35:48.687
<v Speaker 2>we were saying before that it's not that the boss

0:35:48.687 --> 0:35:51.807
<v Speaker 2>shouldn't send the email, but I guess this is giving

0:35:51.927 --> 0:35:55.447
<v Speaker 2>permission to the person who's taken their work email notifications

0:35:55.447 --> 0:35:57.727
<v Speaker 2>off their phone, you know what I mean. But the

0:35:57.767 --> 0:35:59.687
<v Speaker 2>tricky part is is that if you're in a team

0:35:59.727 --> 0:36:02.407
<v Speaker 2>and you've taken your work email notifications off your phone

0:36:02.967 --> 0:36:06.647
<v Speaker 2>and your colleague has not, that's tricky because and I

0:36:06.647 --> 0:36:08.967
<v Speaker 2>guess that's what this legislation is trying to sort of

0:36:09.327 --> 0:36:11.327
<v Speaker 2>on pick right, is that the person who has not

0:36:11.527 --> 0:36:14.247
<v Speaker 2>doesn't get the advantage. It's hard.

0:36:15.767 --> 0:36:19.767
<v Speaker 3>On unlimited out loud access, we drop episodes every Tuesday

0:36:19.767 --> 0:36:23.967
<v Speaker 3>and Thursday exclusively from mum and MAYA. Subscribers follow the

0:36:24.047 --> 0:36:25.887
<v Speaker 3>link in the show notes to get us in your

0:36:25.927 --> 0:36:28.767
<v Speaker 3>ears five days a week, and a huge thank you

0:36:28.887 --> 0:36:30.407
<v Speaker 3>to all our current subscribers.

0:36:35.847 --> 0:36:39.687
<v Speaker 6>The three word method is essentially distilling your style to

0:36:40.167 --> 0:36:44.007
<v Speaker 6>three adjectives. So the three word method not only helps

0:36:44.007 --> 0:36:47.527
<v Speaker 6>people identify their style, but also helps them cultivate it

0:36:47.647 --> 0:36:52.287
<v Speaker 6>into something that is exciting and expressive and fun.

0:36:52.567 --> 0:36:57.087
<v Speaker 3>Apparently all you need to transform your wardrobe is three words.

0:36:58.047 --> 0:37:00.087
<v Speaker 3>In Sydney, at least, it feels like we're on the

0:37:00.127 --> 0:37:02.847
<v Speaker 3>cusp of a new season. It's warming up, springers around

0:37:02.887 --> 0:37:05.407
<v Speaker 3>the corner, and I am yet again in a wardrobe crisis.

0:37:06.247 --> 0:37:10.287
<v Speaker 3>Then I came across Alison Bornstein's dialist and a wardrobe

0:37:10.327 --> 0:37:13.727
<v Speaker 3>consultant big on TikTok. She has a three word method

0:37:13.927 --> 0:37:16.847
<v Speaker 3>that is meant to change how you dress. And here's

0:37:16.887 --> 0:37:20.607
<v Speaker 3>how it works. You choose three adjectives. For those who

0:37:20.607 --> 0:37:25.767
<v Speaker 3>are already stuck, that's three describing words, one practical, one aspirational,

0:37:25.847 --> 0:37:29.327
<v Speaker 3>and one emotional to encapsulate the way you want to

0:37:29.367 --> 0:37:32.287
<v Speaker 3>show up in the world. Now to help, I actually

0:37:32.367 --> 0:37:34.647
<v Speaker 3>went to her TikTok and I found out how she

0:37:34.687 --> 0:37:38.487
<v Speaker 3>would describe Carrie Bradshaw's style. I thought this would help

0:37:38.527 --> 0:37:42.327
<v Speaker 3>everyone three words she had for Carrie were daring, elaborate,

0:37:42.527 --> 0:37:43.367
<v Speaker 3>and mismatched.

0:37:43.927 --> 0:37:46.767
<v Speaker 1>So that's how she's done it in the wrong order.

0:37:46.807 --> 0:37:49.327
<v Speaker 1>Mismatched is practical because it's just a description.

0:37:49.527 --> 0:37:53.047
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I agree, what aspirational would be daring?

0:37:53.367 --> 0:37:53.687
<v Speaker 1>Yes?

0:37:53.727 --> 0:37:56.407
<v Speaker 3>And emotional, Well, elaborate doesn't really work anyway. She broke

0:37:56.407 --> 0:37:58.767
<v Speaker 3>her roles and we're not going to break them. We're

0:37:58.807 --> 0:37:59.487
<v Speaker 3>not going to break them.

0:37:59.687 --> 0:38:00.887
<v Speaker 1>I've got again.

0:38:01.207 --> 0:38:02.407
<v Speaker 2>I want to hear me? Is three?

0:38:02.567 --> 0:38:04.207
<v Speaker 1>My practical word is comfortable?

0:38:04.567 --> 0:38:04.647
<v Speaker 4>Ye.

0:38:05.687 --> 0:38:10.767
<v Speaker 1>My aspirational word is cool, which is so try hard,

0:38:10.447 --> 0:38:15.247
<v Speaker 1>you try hard. And my emotional word is joy.

0:38:15.407 --> 0:38:16.727
<v Speaker 2>That's perfect for you.

0:38:16.767 --> 0:38:20.167
<v Speaker 3>What's really troubling me about those three words is it

0:38:20.167 --> 0:38:21.967
<v Speaker 3>two out of the three were the same as my words,

0:38:23.087 --> 0:38:24.207
<v Speaker 3>and that's my worst nightmare.

0:38:24.407 --> 0:38:25.927
<v Speaker 2>What's your practical word?

0:38:26.607 --> 0:38:29.367
<v Speaker 3>My practical word is obviously comfort, which is why I

0:38:29.407 --> 0:38:33.687
<v Speaker 3>always have my camel too leggings on my aspirational And

0:38:33.727 --> 0:38:35.927
<v Speaker 3>this is what she says is that words mean different

0:38:35.967 --> 0:38:36.807
<v Speaker 3>things to different people.

0:38:36.807 --> 0:38:40.887
<v Speaker 1>That's true. What's your aspirational word cool? Oh no, that's

0:38:40.927 --> 0:38:42.047
<v Speaker 1>not right for you.

0:38:42.287 --> 0:38:44.447
<v Speaker 2>What do you mean temperature wise?

0:38:46.847 --> 0:38:49.207
<v Speaker 1>But you don't seem like you're trying to be cool

0:38:49.247 --> 0:38:50.927
<v Speaker 1>like I'm the biggest try hard in the world. I'm

0:38:51.007 --> 0:38:53.447
<v Speaker 1>always trying so hard. You're not.

0:38:53.767 --> 0:38:57.247
<v Speaker 3>I don't mean coolers in trendy, I mean temperature. I

0:38:57.247 --> 0:39:00.087
<v Speaker 3>mean coolers in I want it to look like I

0:39:00.127 --> 0:39:05.687
<v Speaker 3>haven't tried, which I do do disheveled, disheveled, effortless.

0:39:04.647 --> 0:39:07.767
<v Speaker 1>I think you're a effortless whereas I don't want to

0:39:07.807 --> 0:39:08.447
<v Speaker 1>look effortless.

0:39:08.487 --> 0:39:10.847
<v Speaker 2>Now you want to look like and what's your last word?

0:39:10.847 --> 0:39:11.687
<v Speaker 2>What's your emotional word?

0:39:11.727 --> 0:39:15.327
<v Speaker 3>From emotional? I really thought about it and I went,

0:39:16.287 --> 0:39:20.527
<v Speaker 3>I want to look self assured. I want to look

0:39:20.607 --> 0:39:24.807
<v Speaker 3>like I know who I am. When I wear my clothes,

0:39:25.127 --> 0:39:27.967
<v Speaker 3>It's like, say what you like. It might not be

0:39:28.047 --> 0:39:31.967
<v Speaker 3>on trend. It's certainly not feminine or sexy. But is

0:39:32.007 --> 0:39:33.727
<v Speaker 3>that something that you'd look at and go, Jessee, I

0:39:33.847 --> 0:39:37.047
<v Speaker 3>wear that kind of you know what I mean? I

0:39:37.047 --> 0:39:40.007
<v Speaker 3>don't want to look generic. No, I do want to

0:39:40.047 --> 0:39:42.367
<v Speaker 3>look I.

0:39:42.367 --> 0:39:45.487
<v Speaker 1>Want to look Who's going to say unassuming? But that's

0:39:45.487 --> 0:39:46.607
<v Speaker 1>not an emotion.

0:39:46.967 --> 0:39:51.407
<v Speaker 3>No, Like I don't want to be wearing the latest.

0:39:51.447 --> 0:39:54.247
<v Speaker 3>I have no desire to be wearing the shoes everyone's wearing,

0:39:54.967 --> 0:39:58.567
<v Speaker 3>or to have the latest like I don't know thinging

0:39:58.727 --> 0:40:01.207
<v Speaker 3>in Zara. That's really and it's not not classic.

0:40:02.167 --> 0:40:04.167
<v Speaker 1>Your word isn't classic. I mean that would be a

0:40:04.167 --> 0:40:06.967
<v Speaker 1>practical word, but it's not classic. It's what did you say?

0:40:07.047 --> 0:40:08.127
<v Speaker 1>The word was plain?

0:40:08.327 --> 0:40:09.887
<v Speaker 3>Simple, like just simple.

0:40:10.047 --> 0:40:13.167
<v Speaker 1>Basically that's not an emotion, Holly.

0:40:13.607 --> 0:40:15.567
<v Speaker 3>I think it's confident. I think that I just want

0:40:15.567 --> 0:40:16.487
<v Speaker 3>to feel like myself.

0:40:16.687 --> 0:40:18.127
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, emotional.

0:40:18.167 --> 0:40:20.687
<v Speaker 3>I don't want to feel like I'm dressing. I get

0:40:20.767 --> 0:40:25.407
<v Speaker 3>that comfort cool, yeah, which we've changed to effortless.

0:40:24.847 --> 0:40:28.927
<v Speaker 2>Effortless and confident. I like that. That sounds good. Okay.

0:40:29.127 --> 0:40:32.847
<v Speaker 2>My practical word is easy. Has to be easy, like

0:40:32.927 --> 0:40:34.647
<v Speaker 2>I get dressed. Don't want to have a fucking clock

0:40:34.687 --> 0:40:37.647
<v Speaker 2>in the morning. It has to be easy, put it on,

0:40:37.927 --> 0:40:39.007
<v Speaker 2>throw it on, yeah done.

0:40:39.487 --> 0:40:41.887
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, because yours wouldn't be comfortable because you're always in heels,

0:40:41.927 --> 0:40:44.767
<v Speaker 1>whereas mine wouldn't be easy because I find that's so sad.

0:40:44.887 --> 0:40:47.847
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it has to be for me easy and my

0:40:48.087 --> 0:40:50.487
<v Speaker 2>aspirational world is classy.

0:40:51.327 --> 0:40:54.447
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's why she was Jean's am.

0:40:54.447 --> 0:40:58.447
<v Speaker 2>I am I allowed that one. I want to look classy.

0:40:59.247 --> 0:41:00.727
<v Speaker 3>She never looks slutty.

0:41:00.967 --> 0:41:01.567
<v Speaker 2>I'd like to.

0:41:03.927 --> 0:41:06.847
<v Speaker 1>I wish you could see my face that I'm not

0:41:06.927 --> 0:41:07.967
<v Speaker 1>dissing you in any way.

0:41:08.207 --> 0:41:10.527
<v Speaker 2>I don't know that you're my stylist.

0:41:10.607 --> 0:41:13.047
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if that's it's interesting that that's what

0:41:13.047 --> 0:41:13.927
<v Speaker 1>you're aspiring to.

0:41:14.607 --> 0:41:18.047
<v Speaker 2>Aspiring to mean classic, I mean like the kind of

0:41:18.087 --> 0:41:19.967
<v Speaker 2>clothes that I look at and I go, I love

0:41:20.087 --> 0:41:23.447
<v Speaker 2>that is people who wear very classic, maybe classic, but

0:41:23.567 --> 0:41:27.087
<v Speaker 2>like an effort less good word, like a silk shirt

0:41:27.127 --> 0:41:32.207
<v Speaker 2>and a well. I like classy, like sophisticated.

0:41:33.727 --> 0:41:36.927
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to say modern classy, because classy to me

0:41:37.127 --> 0:41:37.847
<v Speaker 1>might feel.

0:41:37.607 --> 0:41:39.007
<v Speaker 3>A bit like a pencil skirt.

0:41:39.127 --> 0:41:39.367
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:41:39.527 --> 0:41:42.207
<v Speaker 1>Like fancy you're rich, like you're not that, Like you

0:41:42.207 --> 0:41:43.047
<v Speaker 1>don't want that book?

0:41:43.087 --> 0:41:43.487
<v Speaker 2>I don't want.

0:41:43.487 --> 0:41:45.847
<v Speaker 1>You're not fancy you're rich? What about elevated?

0:41:46.247 --> 0:41:49.047
<v Speaker 3>Elevated? I think that could elevated, I do.

0:41:49.167 --> 0:41:51.047
<v Speaker 2>I always think I would like quiet luxury if I

0:41:51.047 --> 0:41:53.887
<v Speaker 2>could afford. What's your my emotional word? I don't know.

0:41:53.887 --> 0:41:56.567
<v Speaker 2>You have to help me with that. What's my emotional word?

0:41:56.967 --> 0:41:59.247
<v Speaker 2>The things I like wearing the most, that I feel

0:41:59.247 --> 0:42:02.607
<v Speaker 2>the most mean emotional, blue.

0:42:02.807 --> 0:42:04.087
<v Speaker 1>Exactly.

0:42:05.447 --> 0:42:11.127
<v Speaker 3>Emotional. I don't know, I do not really, I do

0:42:11.287 --> 0:42:15.447
<v Speaker 3>really like it. I actually, yes, I went to her

0:42:15.447 --> 0:42:18.167
<v Speaker 3>thing because I couldn't think of any words. So playful.

0:42:20.247 --> 0:42:21.487
<v Speaker 3>I'm just gonna throw words.

0:42:21.247 --> 0:42:22.807
<v Speaker 1>But these emotional words are just words.

0:42:22.847 --> 0:42:26.327
<v Speaker 3>These are just all the words, okay, soft, romantic, sensual,

0:42:26.727 --> 0:42:37.487
<v Speaker 3>not holly, demure, no, no floral, no hard, edgy, sexy, tough, minimal, sculptural, neutral, polished, graphic,

0:42:38.047 --> 0:42:40.127
<v Speaker 3>elaborate what I need some emotional.

0:42:40.327 --> 0:42:42.047
<v Speaker 2>This is the thing about people who can speak fashion

0:42:42.087 --> 0:42:44.007
<v Speaker 2>and people who can't write, is that most of us

0:42:44.047 --> 0:42:46.567
<v Speaker 2>know I'm not obviously a fashion person.

0:42:46.407 --> 0:42:47.007
<v Speaker 3>Like me is.

0:42:47.287 --> 0:42:49.087
<v Speaker 2>But there's like when you look at a pair of genes,

0:42:49.127 --> 0:42:51.487
<v Speaker 2>you instinctively know I would wear those, or I wouldn't

0:42:51.487 --> 0:42:53.367
<v Speaker 2>wear those. You know what I mean and like, but

0:42:53.407 --> 0:42:54.967
<v Speaker 2>it's hard to put the words around.

0:42:55.287 --> 0:42:58.047
<v Speaker 1>I actually think that for you, the word is classy,

0:42:58.367 --> 0:43:01.167
<v Speaker 1>even though you know that idea of classy isn't really

0:43:01.167 --> 0:43:03.567
<v Speaker 1>an emotion, but I think for you it is. It's

0:43:03.607 --> 0:43:05.927
<v Speaker 1>like they say fat isn't a feeling, but every woman

0:43:06.007 --> 0:43:09.247
<v Speaker 1>knows that it is, and so I think for you,

0:43:09.327 --> 0:43:12.927
<v Speaker 1>the emotional word is classy because you want to feel classy.

0:43:13.407 --> 0:43:16.927
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to look at the aspirational word is classic

0:43:17.287 --> 0:43:20.487
<v Speaker 1>for you, but modern classic, And the practical word is

0:43:20.527 --> 0:43:23.247
<v Speaker 1>easy easy Jesse. Where did we get stuck with you,

0:43:23.287 --> 0:43:26.127
<v Speaker 1>we couldn't find your third word, which is your emotional word.

0:43:26.487 --> 0:43:27.847
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I have self assured.

0:43:28.487 --> 0:43:30.207
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, confident, I think is good.

0:43:30.327 --> 0:43:34.687
<v Speaker 3>The days I feel the best are when I think

0:43:34.927 --> 0:43:37.567
<v Speaker 3>I have something on. This sounds weird because I don't

0:43:37.567 --> 0:43:39.607
<v Speaker 3>really care about clothes, but I like going to the

0:43:39.607 --> 0:43:41.287
<v Speaker 3>office and being like, I know no one else is

0:43:41.327 --> 0:43:44.407
<v Speaker 3>going to have this on. I feel really like myself

0:43:44.407 --> 0:43:44.647
<v Speaker 3>in this.

0:43:44.927 --> 0:43:47.687
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, what about distinctive isn't right because you do. It's

0:43:47.687 --> 0:43:49.407
<v Speaker 1>not like you want to look different to everybody else.

0:43:49.847 --> 0:43:52.967
<v Speaker 1>You just want to look like yourself.

0:43:53.407 --> 0:43:55.607
<v Speaker 3>But I don't know who I am. Oh, this is

0:43:55.687 --> 0:43:57.327
<v Speaker 3>so deep problem.

0:43:57.807 --> 0:44:00.847
<v Speaker 2>It's getting hard. Yeah, because confident, as it would also

0:44:00.887 --> 0:44:03.367
<v Speaker 2>probably be one of my aspirational words. It's like I

0:44:03.407 --> 0:44:05.807
<v Speaker 2>want to look like I know what I'm doing. And

0:44:05.847 --> 0:44:07.807
<v Speaker 2>sometimes you know when you see yourself on a video

0:44:08.127 --> 0:44:10.887
<v Speaker 2>and like you're sitting across from somebody who's really polished

0:44:10.927 --> 0:44:12.447
<v Speaker 2>and stuff, and you go, oh my god, I look

0:44:12.487 --> 0:44:14.527
<v Speaker 2>like the world's oldest work experience kid.

0:44:15.007 --> 0:44:18.047
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. The days I feel the worst are when I

0:44:18.127 --> 0:44:23.447
<v Speaker 3>come in and I feel messy, I feel crinkled. I

0:44:23.527 --> 0:44:26.367
<v Speaker 3>feel like I threw this together at the last minute

0:44:26.407 --> 0:44:29.767
<v Speaker 3>and it doesn't work. Yeah, it's just not consistent with

0:44:29.807 --> 0:44:32.247
<v Speaker 3>who I want to be today. I don't feel like

0:44:32.367 --> 0:44:34.007
<v Speaker 3>I look elevated and not.

0:44:34.207 --> 0:44:37.367
<v Speaker 1>What's interesting about your fashion is that, like I think

0:44:37.407 --> 0:44:39.007
<v Speaker 1>I know it, and then you'll come in like you

0:44:39.047 --> 0:44:42.527
<v Speaker 1>did last week wearing an amazing two piece from Witchery

0:44:42.847 --> 0:44:44.927
<v Speaker 1>that looks stunning. You never look bad like you had

0:44:44.927 --> 0:44:48.167
<v Speaker 1>on like this brown skirt with a matching sort of

0:44:48.207 --> 0:44:50.687
<v Speaker 1>cropped shirt and a belt, and it was unlike anything

0:44:50.687 --> 0:44:53.327
<v Speaker 1>I'd ever seen before, and it was unlike anything I'd

0:44:53.327 --> 0:44:57.007
<v Speaker 1>ever think of you wearing. But you seemed kind of

0:44:57.207 --> 0:44:58.607
<v Speaker 1>comfortable in it and confident.

0:44:58.927 --> 0:45:01.367
<v Speaker 3>And I suppose this is actually this is what she says,

0:45:01.927 --> 0:45:05.487
<v Speaker 3>that these words are ever changing, and I'm finding that

0:45:06.447 --> 0:45:09.167
<v Speaker 3>in this period of my life it's very different. Like definitely,

0:45:09.247 --> 0:45:12.167
<v Speaker 3>in my early twenties, feminine or something would have come

0:45:12.207 --> 0:45:14.167
<v Speaker 3>out right. There would have been something where I felt

0:45:14.167 --> 0:45:16.447
<v Speaker 3>more sculpted, or I had to have a particular neckline

0:45:16.527 --> 0:45:18.647
<v Speaker 3>or whatever. I feel very diff I.

0:45:18.607 --> 0:45:22.687
<v Speaker 1>Know what the word is for you, possibly emotionally independent,

0:45:23.767 --> 0:45:27.127
<v Speaker 1>because you're not trendy. You don't want to be trendy.

0:45:27.727 --> 0:45:30.047
<v Speaker 1>You just want to look like yourself and how you

0:45:30.287 --> 0:45:32.567
<v Speaker 1>feel on any day might change. It might be one

0:45:32.647 --> 0:45:35.287
<v Speaker 1>day leggings and another day it might be this two

0:45:35.327 --> 0:45:38.447
<v Speaker 1>piece with a belt. But that's you, Holly and I

0:45:38.447 --> 0:45:41.447
<v Speaker 1>are much more. I mean, I'm obviously the biggest trendslot. Yeah,

0:45:41.567 --> 0:45:45.247
<v Speaker 1>Holly likes a version of a trend, but she's always

0:45:45.407 --> 0:45:51.927
<v Speaker 1>very late to it, and you are willfully. It's not

0:45:52.007 --> 0:45:55.687
<v Speaker 1>like I'm going to wear something really crazy. You're just independent.

0:45:55.767 --> 0:45:57.727
<v Speaker 1>You won't be told. And if I ever because I'm like,

0:45:57.767 --> 0:45:59.967
<v Speaker 1>I think Jesse should wear this. And when I've ever

0:46:00.007 --> 0:46:02.767
<v Speaker 1>tried to like give your clothes or whatever, you won't

0:46:02.767 --> 0:46:04.727
<v Speaker 1>have a bar of it because it's someone else's idea

0:46:04.807 --> 0:46:04.967
<v Speaker 1>of you.

0:46:05.767 --> 0:46:08.367
<v Speaker 3>Do you think that your words have changed over time?

0:46:08.967 --> 0:46:12.367
<v Speaker 1>No? Really, Like in my magazine days, I don't think

0:46:12.407 --> 0:46:12.727
<v Speaker 1>I would have.

0:46:12.887 --> 0:46:15.287
<v Speaker 3>Remember when you were trying to dress like a boss,

0:46:15.327 --> 0:46:16.087
<v Speaker 3>like a little while ago.

0:46:16.127 --> 0:46:18.407
<v Speaker 1>Oh god, I had a very weird thing that happened

0:46:18.407 --> 0:46:21.167
<v Speaker 1>for about a year. It's actually Katy's fault. I started

0:46:21.247 --> 0:46:25.047
<v Speaker 1>dressing like her character Evelyn on Strife in suits.

0:46:25.367 --> 0:46:26.887
<v Speaker 3>You know what it was. You were trying to dress

0:46:26.927 --> 0:46:29.047
<v Speaker 3>like someone who took themselves seriously for a minute, and

0:46:29.047 --> 0:46:30.167
<v Speaker 3>then you were like, wait, I don't.

0:46:30.327 --> 0:46:31.967
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to do a full version of me, but

0:46:32.007 --> 0:46:32.607
<v Speaker 1>it just wasn't me.

0:46:32.727 --> 0:46:34.767
<v Speaker 2>But also that was true to your I think your

0:46:34.767 --> 0:46:36.527
<v Speaker 2>words are spot on, and it's not the surprise that

0:46:36.567 --> 0:46:40.047
<v Speaker 2>you're the person who's most clothes focused about that because

0:46:40.287 --> 0:46:42.007
<v Speaker 2>those things were bringing your joy at the time, but

0:46:42.047 --> 0:46:44.167
<v Speaker 2>then they stopped. And when things stopped giving you joy,

0:46:44.247 --> 0:46:47.767
<v Speaker 2>cond dead, which I very much respect. Whereas I'll be like, oh,

0:46:47.807 --> 0:46:49.687
<v Speaker 2>I used to like wearing that thing. Better.

0:46:49.727 --> 0:46:52.407
<v Speaker 1>Still, my practical word, apart from comfort would probably be

0:46:52.407 --> 0:46:57.887
<v Speaker 1>wetex or sponge because I'm just so suggestible. I'm so suggestible,

0:46:57.927 --> 0:47:00.167
<v Speaker 1>Like I'll see Asher wearing something and I go, oh,

0:47:00.167 --> 0:47:01.847
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to dress like Asher. And then I'll see

0:47:02.127 --> 0:47:03.887
<v Speaker 1>Copenhagen fashion Week and I'm like, oh, I'm going to

0:47:04.007 --> 0:47:06.767
<v Speaker 1>dress like those scandy girls. I'm very porous.

0:47:07.087 --> 0:47:09.727
<v Speaker 2>So what's the useful part of this conversation. You're supposed

0:47:09.767 --> 0:47:11.647
<v Speaker 2>to find you three words, and then it's supposed to

0:47:11.647 --> 0:47:14.127
<v Speaker 2>help you what decide what you're going to buy. So

0:47:14.487 --> 0:47:17.007
<v Speaker 2>a bit of advice which I quite liked. The first

0:47:17.287 --> 0:47:19.887
<v Speaker 2>was that she said, if you're having trouble with your words,

0:47:20.607 --> 0:47:23.487
<v Speaker 2>have a chat to some friends or some family or

0:47:23.487 --> 0:47:25.327
<v Speaker 2>your partner, which made me laugh because Luca would be like,

0:47:25.367 --> 0:47:28.167
<v Speaker 2>I don't want to talk about this, and she said,

0:47:28.207 --> 0:47:30.647
<v Speaker 2>don't get offended, which I felt like was for me

0:47:30.687 --> 0:47:32.247
<v Speaker 2>because I would say how do I dress? And me

0:47:32.247 --> 0:47:35.407
<v Speaker 2>would be like ugly stupid.

0:47:35.487 --> 0:47:38.447
<v Speaker 3>It might be like, they're not criticals. I'm looking for today.

0:47:38.487 --> 0:47:39.847
<v Speaker 3>So you meant to do that, and then you're meant

0:47:39.847 --> 0:47:41.847
<v Speaker 3>to write what that word means to you because our

0:47:41.887 --> 0:47:44.407
<v Speaker 3>definitions are different, as mey or and I said, cool,

0:47:44.807 --> 0:47:46.527
<v Speaker 3>they mean different things to us. So we've got to

0:47:46.527 --> 0:47:48.767
<v Speaker 3>really flesh it out. And the third thing is if

0:47:48.807 --> 0:47:51.167
<v Speaker 3>you've got Pinterest or something, they say, make a board.

0:47:51.847 --> 0:47:54.967
<v Speaker 3>You'll see consistent things come through, Like I'm not big

0:47:55.007 --> 0:47:58.407
<v Speaker 3>on color, like I quite like a monochromatic. Blacks and

0:47:58.447 --> 0:48:01.007
<v Speaker 3>whites and bright things just don't work for me. And

0:48:01.087 --> 0:48:03.727
<v Speaker 3>so she said to do that, and that will help

0:48:03.807 --> 0:48:07.047
<v Speaker 3>you with your wardrobe, and like going out and deciding.

0:48:06.727 --> 0:48:09.087
<v Speaker 1>Another way to get those first two words. The practical

0:48:09.087 --> 0:48:12.327
<v Speaker 1>word is pull out all the things that you wear

0:48:12.367 --> 0:48:14.767
<v Speaker 1>the most. Yes, stay in your wardrobe, the ten percent

0:48:14.807 --> 0:48:16.847
<v Speaker 1>of your wardrobe that you wear ninety percent of the time,

0:48:17.167 --> 0:48:18.967
<v Speaker 1>and look at what it all has in common. Maybe

0:48:19.007 --> 0:48:21.247
<v Speaker 1>that word is black. Maybe that word is jenes. Maybe

0:48:21.247 --> 0:48:23.767
<v Speaker 1>that word is comfort, maybe that word is sexy. You've

0:48:23.807 --> 0:48:26.287
<v Speaker 1>got to find what the things that you wear all

0:48:26.327 --> 0:48:30.327
<v Speaker 1>the time have in common. The aspirational word is who

0:48:30.447 --> 0:48:32.607
<v Speaker 1>do you want to dress? Like? Like who would you

0:48:32.687 --> 0:48:34.687
<v Speaker 1>love to be? Who do you like? Follow on Pinterest

0:48:34.767 --> 0:48:39.047
<v Speaker 1>and whatever? And then for the emotion is thinking about

0:48:39.487 --> 0:48:42.887
<v Speaker 1>when you're wearing something, and we all know that feeling

0:48:42.927 --> 0:48:44.887
<v Speaker 1>where you just go, I feel.

0:48:44.647 --> 0:48:46.767
<v Speaker 3>Right, I feel like myself today. Do you have a

0:48:46.767 --> 0:48:50.167
<v Speaker 3>style like on like one person You've always said, carry Bradshaw?

0:48:50.247 --> 0:48:52.127
<v Speaker 3>But like, is there anyone else, like a real person

0:48:52.167 --> 0:48:52.807
<v Speaker 3>who you look to?

0:48:53.127 --> 0:48:56.647
<v Speaker 1>It's the suggestible thing because I'm always looking for different people,

0:48:56.767 --> 0:49:00.847
<v Speaker 1>so I'll like carries Bradshaw style. For a while, I

0:49:00.887 --> 0:49:04.327
<v Speaker 1>reminded myself of her style when I started going too

0:49:04.367 --> 0:49:06.927
<v Speaker 1>far down the suit route and I got a bit sad.

0:49:07.007 --> 0:49:08.847
<v Speaker 1>And then I was like, oh, I remember wearing prints

0:49:08.847 --> 0:49:11.047
<v Speaker 1>and miss things actually gives me a lot of joy.

0:49:11.527 --> 0:49:14.007
<v Speaker 1>So the suits weren't giving me joy. I'd sort of

0:49:14.007 --> 0:49:17.207
<v Speaker 1>moved back. But now there's no particular designer, there's no

0:49:17.247 --> 0:49:20.367
<v Speaker 1>particular celebrity that I'm always like, I want to dress

0:49:20.367 --> 0:49:21.207
<v Speaker 1>how about you? Holly?

0:49:21.567 --> 0:49:24.527
<v Speaker 2>My complete style crush. And the only reason why I

0:49:24.567 --> 0:49:27.967
<v Speaker 2>watched this terrible show is Sylvie and Emily in Paris.

0:49:28.167 --> 0:49:29.967
<v Speaker 3>Have you ever seen that?

0:49:30.407 --> 0:49:32.447
<v Speaker 2>But I can't dress like her because she's like a

0:49:32.607 --> 0:49:35.687
<v Speaker 2>teeny little stick person, but like she is the older

0:49:35.727 --> 0:49:39.647
<v Speaker 2>person in Emily woman. She's a mid life French woman

0:49:39.687 --> 0:49:43.287
<v Speaker 2>and she's very sexy, very sexy, got lots of like

0:49:43.567 --> 0:49:46.407
<v Speaker 2>silk shirts and lots of very like. I love and

0:49:46.527 --> 0:49:50.247
<v Speaker 2>admire people who can wear very simple things and make

0:49:50.287 --> 0:49:50.967
<v Speaker 2>them look amazing.

0:49:51.127 --> 0:49:54.407
<v Speaker 1>Rich women would be rich women slightly.

0:49:54.167 --> 0:49:57.247
<v Speaker 2>Undone like hair, which is easy for me.

0:49:57.367 --> 0:49:58.367
<v Speaker 3>Your feeling is French.

0:49:58.487 --> 0:50:00.887
<v Speaker 1>No, your aspirational word is French.

0:50:01.087 --> 0:50:02.047
<v Speaker 2>French. There you go.

0:50:02.207 --> 0:50:03.007
<v Speaker 1>And I wish I was.

0:50:03.127 --> 0:50:05.527
<v Speaker 2>I wish I was that, but I'm not. But like

0:50:05.687 --> 0:50:07.727
<v Speaker 2>vibes of that. I remember when it was the last

0:50:07.727 --> 0:50:10.247
<v Speaker 2>season was on. I became obsessed with this gold silk

0:50:10.287 --> 0:50:12.847
<v Speaker 2>shirt she wore, and I was messaging our fashion editor

0:50:12.847 --> 0:50:15.167
<v Speaker 2>all the time, going and she's like, Babe, it's Gucci.

0:50:16.287 --> 0:50:17.727
<v Speaker 1>Well that's not gonna.

0:50:17.447 --> 0:50:19.327
<v Speaker 3>Happen, or she can't buy Gucci, but we should buy

0:50:19.367 --> 0:50:24.367
<v Speaker 3>Hollya beret, oh yeah, and a bagette out louders. We

0:50:24.407 --> 0:50:27.967
<v Speaker 3>did a subscriber episode about whether or not it's appropriate

0:50:27.967 --> 0:50:29.927
<v Speaker 3>to buy your friend a sex toy, and look, I

0:50:29.927 --> 0:50:33.207
<v Speaker 3>got very personal because spoiler that dilemma was written in

0:50:33.247 --> 0:50:35.287
<v Speaker 3>by Maya, and yeah it was me that thought it

0:50:35.327 --> 0:50:37.927
<v Speaker 3>was inappropriate. There were a bunch of responses by the

0:50:37.927 --> 0:50:40.847
<v Speaker 3>out louders. Some said best gift ever, those things are

0:50:40.847 --> 0:50:44.487
<v Speaker 3>bloody expensive. Others said it's a hard note from me,

0:50:44.967 --> 0:50:47.847
<v Speaker 3>and another said, as long as it isn't pre loved,

0:50:48.007 --> 0:50:49.367
<v Speaker 3>which I feel like Mayor.

0:50:49.207 --> 0:50:51.567
<v Speaker 1>I imagine if I'm giving people use vibrated, I would

0:50:51.647 --> 0:50:51.927
<v Speaker 1>put it.

0:50:51.927 --> 0:50:52.687
<v Speaker 3>It's not beyond you.

0:50:52.767 --> 0:50:55.247
<v Speaker 2>There was another dilemma in the episode two, so go

0:50:55.367 --> 0:50:57.327
<v Speaker 2>and listen. The link is in our show notes for

0:50:57.367 --> 0:50:59.807
<v Speaker 2>you to follow it. A big thank you to all

0:50:59.847 --> 0:51:02.007
<v Speaker 2>of you out louders for listening to us on today's show.

0:51:02.047 --> 0:51:04.327
<v Speaker 2>Please send us your three words about your fashion, and

0:51:04.367 --> 0:51:07.527
<v Speaker 2>actually send us the three words you think that we

0:51:07.567 --> 0:51:11.207
<v Speaker 2>should have because we're probably delusional and we will be

0:51:11.287 --> 0:51:14.047
<v Speaker 2>back in your ears tomorrow. Thank you to our fabulous

0:51:14.047 --> 0:51:15.487
<v Speaker 2>team for helping us put this show together.

0:51:15.687 --> 0:51:17.807
<v Speaker 3>Bye bye, bye bye.

0:51:18.287 --> 0:51:21.567
<v Speaker 1>Shout out to any Muma Mia subscribers listening if you

0:51:21.687 --> 0:51:24.047
<v Speaker 1>love the show and want to support us as well.

0:51:24.247 --> 0:51:26.767
<v Speaker 1>Subscribing to MoMA mia is the very best way to

0:51:26.807 --> 0:51:29.207
<v Speaker 1>do so. There is a link in the episode description