WEBVTT - Blake, Justin & The Taylor Swift Defence

0:00:10.622 --> 0:00:13.382
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to a MoMA Mia podcast.

0:00:13.822 --> 0:00:17.182
<v Speaker 2>Mamma Mia acknowledges the traditional owners of land and waters

0:00:17.222 --> 0:00:21.622
<v Speaker 2>that this podcast is recorded on Jesse. The Outlouders only

0:00:21.662 --> 0:00:23.662
<v Speaker 2>have one question for you, and that is, did you

0:00:23.701 --> 0:00:25.342
<v Speaker 2>get your KFC on Mother's Day?

0:00:25.822 --> 0:00:29.622
<v Speaker 3>Look? I did. The Outlouders know that I've been vying

0:00:29.742 --> 0:00:33.742
<v Speaker 3>to be an official KFC ambassador for most of my life.

0:00:33.942 --> 0:00:37.702
<v Speaker 3>But on the way home from my parents' place is

0:00:37.742 --> 0:00:40.141
<v Speaker 3>a KFC and every time I go past it, I

0:00:40.182 --> 0:00:42.622
<v Speaker 3>get myself a little treat. And because it was Mother's Day,

0:00:42.902 --> 0:00:44.822
<v Speaker 3>I was like, I'm going to get myself a large

0:00:44.862 --> 0:00:47.902
<v Speaker 3>hot ships and a little drink. And I got myself

0:00:47.942 --> 0:00:50.462
<v Speaker 3>my KFC and it was a great way to celebrate myself.

0:00:50.582 --> 0:00:52.902
<v Speaker 3>What you may notice about that story is that I

0:00:53.022 --> 0:00:56.942
<v Speaker 3>purchased my OWNKFC, and I may have some feedback about that,

0:00:57.262 --> 0:00:59.942
<v Speaker 3>but I loved the outlouders who messaged me and said,

0:01:00.022 --> 0:01:02.382
<v Speaker 3>just letting you know I had KFC for Mother's Day.

0:01:02.422 --> 0:01:05.902
<v Speaker 3>At first I thought perhaps an unusual pairing, and then

0:01:05.941 --> 0:01:08.382
<v Speaker 3>they realized that it was actually perfect.

0:01:11.862 --> 0:01:14.702
<v Speaker 2>Hello and welcome to Mama Mia. Out loud. What women

0:01:14.702 --> 0:01:17.262
<v Speaker 2>are actually talking about on Monday The twelfth of May.

0:01:17.422 --> 0:01:19.182
<v Speaker 2>I'm Holly Wainwright, I'm.

0:01:18.982 --> 0:01:21.102
<v Speaker 3>Mea Friedman, and I'm Jesse Stevens.

0:01:21.222 --> 0:01:23.302
<v Speaker 2>And if we sound a little bit different to you today,

0:01:23.342 --> 0:01:26.262
<v Speaker 2>that's because we are all recording remotely. As many out

0:01:26.262 --> 0:01:28.222
<v Speaker 2>louders know, we are on the road at the moment.

0:01:28.262 --> 0:01:30.582
<v Speaker 2>We are in Brisbane and Sydney this week and there's

0:01:30.622 --> 0:01:32.782
<v Speaker 2>a lot of stuff going on. So if we sound

0:01:32.822 --> 0:01:35.582
<v Speaker 2>a little bit like we're not in studio, that's why.

0:01:35.862 --> 0:01:39.662
<v Speaker 2>But on the show today it sounds like a simple question,

0:01:39.942 --> 0:01:43.022
<v Speaker 2>but this year it feels like the opposite. Who is

0:01:43.142 --> 0:01:47.982
<v Speaker 2>Mother's Day four? Also, one of the biggest millennial celebrities

0:01:47.982 --> 0:01:51.422
<v Speaker 2>looks like he's been having a slow motion breakdown for years.

0:01:51.742 --> 0:01:54.382
<v Speaker 2>After all we learned from Brittany, Should we be better

0:01:54.422 --> 0:01:58.542
<v Speaker 2>at understanding what's going on with Justin Bieber? And is

0:01:58.582 --> 0:02:02.222
<v Speaker 2>it okay to film at concerts? One of the coolest

0:02:02.222 --> 0:02:05.782
<v Speaker 2>stars in the world says no, But first, Mia Friedman.

0:02:06.262 --> 0:02:10.022
<v Speaker 1>In case you missed it, Weight Watchers has filed for bankruptcy.

0:02:10.462 --> 0:02:14.181
<v Speaker 1>They filed for Chapter eleven bankruptcy in the US this

0:02:14.302 --> 0:02:16.742
<v Speaker 1>month because they have a whole lot of debt. They've

0:02:16.781 --> 0:02:22.022
<v Speaker 1>got like two and a half billion dollars Australian in debt.

0:02:22.262 --> 0:02:25.142
<v Speaker 1>So what this means is it's a financial restructuring. It's

0:02:25.142 --> 0:02:28.022
<v Speaker 1>not a liquidation. The company is going to continue operating

0:02:28.382 --> 0:02:31.381
<v Speaker 1>and services are going to continue uninterrupted. They've got about

0:02:31.422 --> 0:02:34.902
<v Speaker 1>three million members around the world, including in Australia, so

0:02:34.942 --> 0:02:38.582
<v Speaker 1>don't panic if you are a weight Watches member. But

0:02:38.622 --> 0:02:41.982
<v Speaker 1>the reason for this is that it's basically been swallowed

0:02:42.342 --> 0:02:45.901
<v Speaker 1>by prescription weight loss drugs, things like a Zampik and

0:02:45.982 --> 0:02:50.582
<v Speaker 1>Munjaro and Mungovi. You might remember that Oprah became a

0:02:50.982 --> 0:02:55.262
<v Speaker 1>shareholder in weight Watches in exchange, I think for her endorsement.

0:02:55.822 --> 0:02:59.622
<v Speaker 1>But then soon after that she said that she was

0:02:59.742 --> 0:03:03.302
<v Speaker 1>on one of the golp one drugs, and I think

0:03:03.342 --> 0:03:07.302
<v Speaker 1>that experience has obviously been really, really common. So they

0:03:07.542 --> 0:03:11.062
<v Speaker 1>are planning to emerge from bankruptcy about forty days after

0:03:11.102 --> 0:03:15.422
<v Speaker 1>they sort of restructure themselves more into a telehealth business

0:03:15.462 --> 0:03:19.942
<v Speaker 1>and they will be offering prescription weight loss medications alongside

0:03:20.022 --> 0:03:21.222
<v Speaker 1>their traditional programs.

0:03:21.262 --> 0:03:23.181
<v Speaker 2>What do you think So that sounds like a kind

0:03:23.181 --> 0:03:26.902
<v Speaker 2>of colab right. They're like, we can't necessarily compete anymore

0:03:27.102 --> 0:03:30.382
<v Speaker 2>with this new technology, so we need to be part

0:03:30.422 --> 0:03:33.102
<v Speaker 2>of that and that maybe they should have seen that

0:03:33.142 --> 0:03:34.062
<v Speaker 2>coming a bit earlier.

0:03:34.702 --> 0:03:37.742
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, every sort of weight loss company that I've seen

0:03:37.982 --> 0:03:41.862
<v Speaker 3>adds for recently seems to have to acknowledge the elephant

0:03:41.902 --> 0:03:45.422
<v Speaker 3>in the room, which is weight loss injections. But reading

0:03:45.462 --> 0:03:49.342
<v Speaker 3>this story, it just highlighted for me how much our

0:03:49.502 --> 0:03:54.182
<v Speaker 3>understanding of weight loss and dieting has evolved. I remember

0:03:54.182 --> 0:03:57.182
<v Speaker 3>growing up and a lot of people's mums were doing

0:03:57.182 --> 0:03:59.382
<v Speaker 3>weight watches and it was all about the point system

0:03:59.382 --> 0:04:01.302
<v Speaker 3>and you could have that brownie and you could have

0:04:01.302 --> 0:04:04.262
<v Speaker 3>that glass of wine, but then you might skip lunch.

0:04:04.502 --> 0:04:06.822
<v Speaker 3>I'm sure that's not what Weight Watches was actually saying,

0:04:06.862 --> 0:04:10.182
<v Speaker 3>but that's how some people were using that point system.

0:04:10.222 --> 0:04:14.022
<v Speaker 3>And then, of course in twenty eighteen, I think Weight

0:04:14.022 --> 0:04:16.981
<v Speaker 3>Watchers saw the writing on the wall and rebranded as

0:04:17.462 --> 0:04:20.902
<v Speaker 3>ww because they knew that that term and even the

0:04:20.981 --> 0:04:26.342
<v Speaker 3>explicit reference to weight didn't sit comfortably with women. We

0:04:26.741 --> 0:04:30.222
<v Speaker 3>talk a fair bit about weight loss injections, but it's

0:04:30.301 --> 0:04:34.821
<v Speaker 3>worth remembering that the success rate of diets is between

0:04:34.981 --> 0:04:38.501
<v Speaker 3>one and five percent. Going on a diet did not

0:04:38.741 --> 0:04:41.782
<v Speaker 3>work for people, and I do think that there is

0:04:41.821 --> 0:04:44.701
<v Speaker 3>a place for companies, whether it's WWU or I've had

0:04:44.741 --> 0:04:47.382
<v Speaker 3>a few other brands talk about it. Just because you're

0:04:47.381 --> 0:04:50.261
<v Speaker 3>on weight loss injections doesn't mean that you're not interested

0:04:50.301 --> 0:04:52.421
<v Speaker 3>in your health and making sure that you're eating the

0:04:52.462 --> 0:04:55.021
<v Speaker 3>right foods and fueling your body. So I do think

0:04:55.022 --> 0:04:57.142
<v Speaker 3>that there's a place for those two things to come

0:04:57.181 --> 0:04:59.582
<v Speaker 3>together and to help people with health literacy.

0:04:59.821 --> 0:05:02.581
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, because at their best, those kind of groups are

0:05:02.582 --> 0:05:06.181
<v Speaker 2>basically support groups. Right, So it seems so outdated now,

0:05:06.222 --> 0:05:09.902
<v Speaker 2>but the original weight watchers people had public ways supposed

0:05:09.941 --> 0:05:12.621
<v Speaker 2>to be to hold you accountable and also to give

0:05:12.662 --> 0:05:14.782
<v Speaker 2>you other people to talk to about your weight. And

0:05:14.821 --> 0:05:17.981
<v Speaker 2>it's so funny, as you've said, Jesse, the culture shifted

0:05:18.022 --> 0:05:21.181
<v Speaker 2>on this a while ago, because now it seems really

0:05:21.222 --> 0:05:23.702
<v Speaker 2>strange that you would reward the person with the lowest

0:05:23.782 --> 0:05:26.101
<v Speaker 2>number in the group and everybody'd be like, go Betty

0:05:26.142 --> 0:05:28.461
<v Speaker 2>and all that kind of stuff. But on the other hand,

0:05:29.061 --> 0:05:31.942
<v Speaker 2>when you are trying to change something as significant as

0:05:31.981 --> 0:05:34.261
<v Speaker 2>how you eat or something about your health a body,

0:05:34.301 --> 0:05:37.502
<v Speaker 2>it can be really lonely. It can genuinely be really lonely,

0:05:37.902 --> 0:05:40.702
<v Speaker 2>especially if you feel a level of shame attached to it,

0:05:40.741 --> 0:05:44.062
<v Speaker 2>which many women do. So the idea of having this

0:05:44.142 --> 0:05:48.142
<v Speaker 2>sort of community I think still has a place, but yeah,

0:05:48.222 --> 0:05:50.741
<v Speaker 2>it's every rule is having to be rewritten in the

0:05:50.782 --> 0:05:52.101
<v Speaker 2>face of this new medicine.

0:05:52.142 --> 0:05:54.742
<v Speaker 3>It also made me think about how weight watches or

0:05:54.861 --> 0:05:57.462
<v Speaker 3>WW and I think that this is a nature of

0:05:57.541 --> 0:06:01.341
<v Speaker 3>diets when you're doing something like this, or when someone

0:06:01.421 --> 0:06:03.741
<v Speaker 3>is on a diet, it seems to only turn up

0:06:03.782 --> 0:06:07.181
<v Speaker 3>the food noise. And what these injections appear to be

0:06:07.222 --> 0:06:08.662
<v Speaker 3>doing and what a lot of people who take them

0:06:08.662 --> 0:06:10.902
<v Speaker 3>say is that it turns it town. I think that's

0:06:10.981 --> 0:06:14.381
<v Speaker 3>really interesting. It's like the more that we talk about

0:06:14.381 --> 0:06:16.781
<v Speaker 3>it and obsess over everything that goes into our mouth,

0:06:17.222 --> 0:06:19.501
<v Speaker 3>the worse the problem can become, or the more all

0:06:19.541 --> 0:06:22.861
<v Speaker 3>consuming it can become. So it's it's a very interesting evolution.

0:06:23.342 --> 0:06:26.302
<v Speaker 1>Wait watches local business here in Australia just confirming they

0:06:26.342 --> 0:06:28.421
<v Speaker 1>say they're here to stay and they will continue to

0:06:28.462 --> 0:06:31.662
<v Speaker 1>operate as usual. The Australian services will not be affected

0:06:31.861 --> 0:06:33.621
<v Speaker 1>by the US restructuring process.

0:06:34.421 --> 0:06:37.582
<v Speaker 3>In case you missed it, Taylor Swift has been subpoenaed

0:06:37.621 --> 0:06:40.262
<v Speaker 3>in the Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni case. And does

0:06:40.301 --> 0:06:42.182
<v Speaker 3>that mean that we will finally be able to read

0:06:42.222 --> 0:06:46.101
<v Speaker 3>all of Taylor Swift's text messages. Well, here is what happened.

0:06:46.501 --> 0:06:48.582
<v Speaker 3>Baldoni's lawyer, Brian Friedman.

0:06:48.741 --> 0:06:49.622
<v Speaker 1>No relation.

0:06:51.381 --> 0:06:54.541
<v Speaker 3>To get the gossip, the gossip that man would have.

0:06:54.741 --> 0:06:55.902
<v Speaker 3>Oh my god, I think you're.

0:06:57.381 --> 0:06:57.902
<v Speaker 1>Very much.

0:06:58.262 --> 0:07:01.181
<v Speaker 3>I think there's a connection. I think it has the

0:07:01.262 --> 0:07:02.181
<v Speaker 3>same interesting.

0:07:02.181 --> 0:07:03.861
<v Speaker 1>It's bringing my name into disrepute.

0:07:05.061 --> 0:07:08.782
<v Speaker 3>The subpoena was issued last week. Now reminder, a subpoena

0:07:08.902 --> 0:07:12.222
<v Speaker 3>is a legal document issued by a court that compels

0:07:12.262 --> 0:07:15.902
<v Speaker 3>a person to either attend a hearing or a trial.

0:07:16.422 --> 0:07:20.062
<v Speaker 3>Maybe they have to give evidence or produce documents related

0:07:20.102 --> 0:07:24.222
<v Speaker 3>to the case. A representative for Swift said the subpoena

0:07:24.422 --> 0:07:27.461
<v Speaker 3>was purely to draw public interest and has nothing to

0:07:27.502 --> 0:07:30.462
<v Speaker 3>do with focusing on the facts of the case. They added,

0:07:30.662 --> 0:07:34.021
<v Speaker 3>Taylor Swift never set foot on the set of this movie.

0:07:34.142 --> 0:07:37.381
<v Speaker 3>She was not involved in any casting or creative decisions.

0:07:37.502 --> 0:07:39.502
<v Speaker 3>She did not score the film. She never saw an

0:07:39.622 --> 0:07:41.701
<v Speaker 3>edit or made any notes on the film. She did

0:07:41.702 --> 0:07:44.422
<v Speaker 3>not even see It Ends with Us until weeks after

0:07:44.462 --> 0:07:47.382
<v Speaker 3>its public release, and was traveling around the globe during

0:07:47.422 --> 0:07:50.821
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty three and twenty twenty four, headlining the biggest

0:07:50.902 --> 0:07:55.062
<v Speaker 3>tour in history. Now this is important because there is

0:07:55.102 --> 0:07:59.622
<v Speaker 3>a theory floated by an anonymous emailer who contacted des

0:07:59.622 --> 0:08:03.782
<v Speaker 3>Moi saying that the subpoena is being used strategically to

0:08:03.862 --> 0:08:07.982
<v Speaker 3>basically expose Blake Lively as a liar. Now, remember Blake

0:08:08.022 --> 0:08:10.821
<v Speaker 3>Lively when all those her Takes messages came out, she

0:08:11.062 --> 0:08:14.062
<v Speaker 3>used Taylor Swift almost as a point of leverage in saying,

0:08:14.582 --> 0:08:16.942
<v Speaker 3>I've got these dragons on my side. She used this

0:08:17.022 --> 0:08:20.502
<v Speaker 3>Game of Thrones analogy, and she said that Ryan Reynolds

0:08:20.582 --> 0:08:26.021
<v Speaker 3>and Taylor Swift help her creatively a lot. Basically, Baldoni's

0:08:26.262 --> 0:08:30.782
<v Speaker 3>team say that she almost used Taylor Swift as a

0:08:30.902 --> 0:08:34.382
<v Speaker 3>threat to suggest like, I've got all this power and

0:08:34.462 --> 0:08:36.462
<v Speaker 3>I'm taking over this movie. I've got the backing of

0:08:36.462 --> 0:08:38.982
<v Speaker 3>one of the most famous women in the world. And

0:08:39.022 --> 0:08:42.622
<v Speaker 3>the theory goes that Baldoni's lawyers will argue that she

0:08:42.822 --> 0:08:45.542
<v Speaker 3>used Taylor's name to take over the movie, when in fact,

0:08:45.622 --> 0:08:48.022
<v Speaker 3>Taylor had nothing at all to do with the movie,

0:08:48.302 --> 0:08:51.582
<v Speaker 3>and it basically paints Blake Lively as someone who doesn't

0:08:51.622 --> 0:08:54.062
<v Speaker 3>tell the truth, which is what you want in a

0:08:54.102 --> 0:08:56.342
<v Speaker 3>case like this. Maya what do you think?

0:08:56.822 --> 0:09:01.142
<v Speaker 1>Ooh, shots fired by my girl Tree Payne. Tree Payne

0:09:01.222 --> 0:09:06.262
<v Speaker 1>is the legendary publicist of Taylor Swift with the best

0:09:06.342 --> 0:09:09.902
<v Speaker 1>name in the whole world. She's formidable and one of

0:09:09.902 --> 0:09:13.382
<v Speaker 1>my Roman empires since this began. Is just how pissed

0:09:13.582 --> 0:09:16.982
<v Speaker 1>Tree would be to have Taylor's name brought into this

0:09:17.142 --> 0:09:22.862
<v Speaker 1>absolute shit fight between Justin Baldoni and Blake Lively. I

0:09:22.902 --> 0:09:27.582
<v Speaker 1>think it's an interesting idea that this has been used

0:09:27.622 --> 0:09:31.582
<v Speaker 1>to flush out Taylor in terms of they knew that

0:09:31.662 --> 0:09:34.782
<v Speaker 1>by subpoena ing her, she would protest. There are a

0:09:34.822 --> 0:09:37.382
<v Speaker 1>lot of people who've protested about being dragged into this

0:09:37.742 --> 0:09:41.462
<v Speaker 1>and about being subpoened. Is Justin Baldoni trying to turn

0:09:41.502 --> 0:09:45.462
<v Speaker 1>this into a media circus? Absolutely, But I think my

0:09:45.702 --> 0:09:49.502
<v Speaker 1>understanding of this is that Blake would have probably said

0:09:50.022 --> 0:09:56.382
<v Speaker 1>something to him dropping Taylor's name. He's then perceived that

0:09:56.782 --> 0:10:02.182
<v Speaker 1>as her weaponizing Taylor, and so he's flipped it and said, well,

0:10:02.542 --> 0:10:06.582
<v Speaker 1>game on, let's do this. And so what Taylor has done,

0:10:06.862 --> 0:10:09.782
<v Speaker 1>or Tree has done on Taylor's behalf by distance seeing

0:10:09.822 --> 0:10:14.702
<v Speaker 1>herself massively from Blake and from the movie is to

0:10:14.782 --> 0:10:18.222
<v Speaker 1>basically say in a line that Taylor herself coined around

0:10:18.262 --> 0:10:20.702
<v Speaker 1>the whole Kim Kardashi and Kane West thing is I

0:10:20.742 --> 0:10:23.062
<v Speaker 1>wish to be removed from this narrative. I don't have

0:10:23.102 --> 0:10:24.862
<v Speaker 1>a dog in this fight. This is not me. But

0:10:25.102 --> 0:10:27.262
<v Speaker 1>by the same token, she went on to say in

0:10:27.302 --> 0:10:29.422
<v Speaker 1>a later part of that statement that this is a

0:10:29.502 --> 0:10:33.102
<v Speaker 1>case about sexual harassment and intimidating women, which is very

0:10:33.222 --> 0:10:36.462
<v Speaker 1>much on black side. So she's not saying this is

0:10:36.502 --> 0:10:40.582
<v Speaker 1>between two people, and allegedly she's drawing a line in

0:10:40.622 --> 0:10:43.542
<v Speaker 1>the sound about where she stands and who she backs

0:10:43.582 --> 0:10:46.782
<v Speaker 1>and what she thinks this case is about. But she's

0:10:46.862 --> 0:10:47.702
<v Speaker 1>saying I'm out.

0:10:48.102 --> 0:10:50.382
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's being read a lot as far as I

0:10:50.382 --> 0:10:53.022
<v Speaker 2>can see, as Taylor distancing herself from Blake. But actually

0:10:53.022 --> 0:10:55.102
<v Speaker 2>there's a way of reading it that's supportive, as you

0:10:55.182 --> 0:10:57.342
<v Speaker 2>kind of point out me, which is that she's actually

0:10:57.382 --> 0:11:00.502
<v Speaker 2>saying to Justin Baldoni, stop trying to bring me into this,

0:11:00.702 --> 0:11:02.141
<v Speaker 2>like this has got nothing to do with me. I

0:11:02.142 --> 0:11:04.022
<v Speaker 2>don't want to be part of it. I think the

0:11:04.102 --> 0:11:07.062
<v Speaker 2>reporting which is everybody saying, oh, she's telling Blake to

0:11:07.062 --> 0:11:08.942
<v Speaker 2>back off. If they're really good friends, if they've been

0:11:08.982 --> 0:11:11.862
<v Speaker 2>really good friends for forever, then of course they would

0:11:11.942 --> 0:11:15.222
<v Speaker 2>talk about work. Everybody does, And I think you could

0:11:15.222 --> 0:11:17.822
<v Speaker 2>definitely read this as her just saying justin, don't try

0:11:17.862 --> 0:11:18.702
<v Speaker 2>and drag me into it.

0:11:18.822 --> 0:11:21.142
<v Speaker 3>So what do you think we'll get, because we're probably

0:11:21.142 --> 0:11:23.382
<v Speaker 3>not going to get her text messages? Right, But do

0:11:23.422 --> 0:11:26.182
<v Speaker 3>you see a world in which she's actually summoned to

0:11:26.262 --> 0:11:28.302
<v Speaker 3>the trial or do you think that this is just

0:11:28.982 --> 0:11:31.142
<v Speaker 3>a play in a game of chess to get a

0:11:31.142 --> 0:11:31.822
<v Speaker 3>statement like this?

0:11:32.302 --> 0:11:34.902
<v Speaker 1>So that's what the statement is designed to do. It's

0:11:34.942 --> 0:11:39.142
<v Speaker 1>to basically flag this is an attention grab, this is

0:11:39.182 --> 0:11:43.182
<v Speaker 1>a circus. Trying to involve Taylor is really a tactic

0:11:43.742 --> 0:11:46.622
<v Speaker 1>and she's got nothing to add to this legal case.

0:11:47.102 --> 0:11:49.782
<v Speaker 1>And so it's then up to the judge whether she

0:11:49.982 --> 0:11:54.822
<v Speaker 1>is deposed or whether some documents are subpoened. You know,

0:11:54.942 --> 0:11:57.542
<v Speaker 1>that's a call for the judge to make. It was

0:11:57.582 --> 0:12:01.702
<v Speaker 1>Mother's Day in Australia yesterday and something I noticed is

0:12:01.742 --> 0:12:06.982
<v Speaker 1>that things went a little bit berserk online and also

0:12:07.062 --> 0:12:09.742
<v Speaker 1>on my phone. If you own a phone and you're

0:12:09.782 --> 0:12:12.022
<v Speaker 1>on social media, and even if you're not, even if

0:12:12.062 --> 0:12:13.982
<v Speaker 1>you just have a phone and you've got text messages,

0:12:14.822 --> 0:12:19.222
<v Speaker 1>I noticed a real change this year in the amount

0:12:19.462 --> 0:12:22.982
<v Speaker 1>of mental load that was required on Mother's Day. It

0:12:23.022 --> 0:12:25.302
<v Speaker 1>all started as soon as I turned my phone on

0:12:25.622 --> 0:12:28.062
<v Speaker 1>when I got a lot of messages in my group

0:12:28.102 --> 0:12:31.502
<v Speaker 1>chats and from girlfriends and in family group chats, Happy

0:12:31.542 --> 0:12:34.502
<v Speaker 1>Mother's Day to all the mothers, and lots of validation

0:12:34.622 --> 0:12:37.342
<v Speaker 1>and acknowledgment of what a wonderful job we do, which

0:12:37.382 --> 0:12:40.102
<v Speaker 1>seems lovely. But then I was like, oh God, do

0:12:40.182 --> 0:12:42.102
<v Speaker 1>I have to reply to all these messages? Do I

0:12:42.102 --> 0:12:45.142
<v Speaker 1>have to message all the mothers that I know? Which

0:12:45.222 --> 0:12:48.222
<v Speaker 1>is a lot? And then I looked on social media,

0:12:48.342 --> 0:12:51.222
<v Speaker 1>and it often is a frenzy on Mother's Day of

0:12:51.422 --> 0:12:55.262
<v Speaker 1>women posting about their mothers, sometimes their mothers in law.

0:12:55.382 --> 0:12:59.022
<v Speaker 1>Less that, but now I noticed this year a couple

0:12:59.062 --> 0:13:02.342
<v Speaker 1>of different things. People were posting about themselves as mothers

0:13:02.382 --> 0:13:06.862
<v Speaker 1>and thanking their children, and it just became, I don't know,

0:13:06.982 --> 0:13:10.102
<v Speaker 1>it was like everybody had to do all this work

0:13:11.102 --> 0:13:15.102
<v Speaker 1>to include everybody and make everybody felt included. Jesse Hoole,

0:13:15.222 --> 0:13:17.102
<v Speaker 1>what was your experience yesterday?

0:13:17.662 --> 0:13:20.542
<v Speaker 3>I think Mother's Day has become a very dangerous day.

0:13:20.662 --> 0:13:22.822
<v Speaker 3>Dangerous is the word I would use to describe it.

0:13:23.222 --> 0:13:26.422
<v Speaker 3>And it is dangerous because there is no card, there

0:13:26.462 --> 0:13:29.382
<v Speaker 3>is no gift that could possibly capture the work and

0:13:29.422 --> 0:13:32.942
<v Speaker 3>the sacrifice that goes into one of the most undervalued

0:13:33.022 --> 0:13:36.302
<v Speaker 3>jobs that anyone ever does, and because there is so

0:13:36.582 --> 0:13:40.502
<v Speaker 3>little external validation every other day of the year, I

0:13:40.582 --> 0:13:45.142
<v Speaker 3>think that probably waking up on Mother's Day it feels

0:13:45.302 --> 0:13:48.062
<v Speaker 3>like a trap for a lot of people, and I

0:13:48.102 --> 0:13:52.622
<v Speaker 3>think that women are shouldering this burden. So I would

0:13:52.622 --> 0:13:56.182
<v Speaker 3>be really interested in speaking to retail workers about who's

0:13:56.222 --> 0:13:59.262
<v Speaker 3>buying the majority of Mother's Day gifts because I think

0:13:59.502 --> 0:14:03.302
<v Speaker 3>daughters are acknowledging their mothers. I think the people that

0:14:03.342 --> 0:14:06.302
<v Speaker 3>I got the most messages from were other mothers, as

0:14:06.342 --> 0:14:09.902
<v Speaker 3>you say, Maya, saying you're doing a great job. I

0:14:09.942 --> 0:14:12.742
<v Speaker 3>see you, I value what you do. And then I

0:14:12.782 --> 0:14:15.142
<v Speaker 3>saw at one point I was scrolling through my Instagram

0:14:15.182 --> 0:14:18.462
<v Speaker 3>feed and as you say, Mea, it was like all

0:14:18.502 --> 0:14:21.662
<v Speaker 3>these mothers posting about being mothers, which I get, and

0:14:22.142 --> 0:14:24.582
<v Speaker 3>I loved it, and I love seeing photos of people's families.

0:14:25.222 --> 0:14:30.102
<v Speaker 3>But I thought, is this US posting because we, again

0:14:30.182 --> 0:14:33.022
<v Speaker 3>we do not get any other external validation. Is this

0:14:33.182 --> 0:14:35.342
<v Speaker 3>us saying I am here. I want to be seen.

0:14:35.462 --> 0:14:37.662
<v Speaker 3>I want my work to be seen, and I do

0:14:37.782 --> 0:14:41.542
<v Speaker 3>not feel like I am surrounded by people who see me.

0:14:41.782 --> 0:14:45.662
<v Speaker 3>And Amy Girard, who's a author and radio host, posted

0:14:45.742 --> 0:14:47.622
<v Speaker 3>late last night, just going glad.

0:14:47.422 --> 0:14:51.702
<v Speaker 4>Mother's Days over. I did pull out a little violin

0:14:51.822 --> 0:14:56.662
<v Speaker 4>for myself yesterday and rightly, so you know, I feel alive.

0:14:56.902 --> 0:15:01.262
<v Speaker 4>I am very low maintenance. I really don't ask much.

0:15:02.182 --> 0:15:05.782
<v Speaker 4>I don't expect gifts. I don't expect much on Mother's Day.

0:15:05.942 --> 0:15:10.342
<v Speaker 4>But here's what I do expect. If you can't my load,

0:15:10.502 --> 0:15:12.622
<v Speaker 4>like I mean, at the end of the day, washing

0:15:12.622 --> 0:15:16.502
<v Speaker 4>still needs to get done. Kids still need to be fed. Now,

0:15:16.622 --> 0:15:20.062
<v Speaker 4>if you can't lighten my load and do the washing

0:15:20.102 --> 0:15:22.342
<v Speaker 4>for me, and I don't know, just help me to

0:15:22.382 --> 0:15:25.862
<v Speaker 4>relax for the day, then at least be nice to me,

0:15:26.382 --> 0:15:26.662
<v Speaker 4>you know.

0:15:27.222 --> 0:15:27.982
<v Speaker 1>Just be nice to me.

0:15:28.262 --> 0:15:31.942
<v Speaker 4>I think the saddest part is I must have gotten

0:15:32.182 --> 0:15:37.462
<v Speaker 4>over two thousand replies to that story from other moms

0:15:37.502 --> 0:15:41.782
<v Speaker 4>just saying feels like I've felt like a piece of

0:15:41.982 --> 0:15:46.222
<v Speaker 4>today as well, Like it's one fucking day, guys, what

0:15:47.182 --> 0:15:47.902
<v Speaker 4>fucking day.

0:15:48.462 --> 0:15:50.462
<v Speaker 3>I think that there's a bit of an epidemic of that,

0:15:50.542 --> 0:15:51.262
<v Speaker 3>if we're honest.

0:15:51.782 --> 0:15:55.342
<v Speaker 2>My mother's Day, which was perfectly pleasant, is simplified by

0:15:55.342 --> 0:15:57.822
<v Speaker 2>the fact that I don't have in laws here anymore

0:15:57.822 --> 0:16:00.462
<v Speaker 2>with rens mom, is it with us anymore? My parents

0:16:00.502 --> 0:16:02.222
<v Speaker 2>live on the other side of the world. And obviously

0:16:02.262 --> 0:16:06.182
<v Speaker 2>those things are painful on Mother's Day, but they make

0:16:06.262 --> 0:16:10.302
<v Speaker 2>it easier because it's only about me their house. Not

0:16:10.422 --> 0:16:12.662
<v Speaker 2>that it was it was about sport and washing and

0:16:12.702 --> 0:16:15.662
<v Speaker 2>all those things. But a shift that I noticed this

0:16:15.982 --> 0:16:19.382
<v Speaker 2>year online was I saw more than one, in fact,

0:16:19.502 --> 0:16:25.422
<v Speaker 2>many tiktoks and in sturreels from mothers saying older mothers

0:16:25.422 --> 0:16:28.582
<v Speaker 2>of adult children step aside. This is not your day.

0:16:28.622 --> 0:16:30.462
<v Speaker 2>It's personified by this little grab.

0:16:30.542 --> 0:16:30.742
<v Speaker 4>You know.

0:16:30.822 --> 0:16:33.062
<v Speaker 2>The one thing I will never understand on Mother's Day

0:16:33.582 --> 0:16:36.102
<v Speaker 2>is grandmothers and mothers who only want to be celebrated.

0:16:36.102 --> 0:16:40.062
<v Speaker 2>But they don't want to celebrate their daughter or their

0:16:40.462 --> 0:16:41.462
<v Speaker 2>daughter in law.

0:16:41.342 --> 0:16:43.662
<v Speaker 4>For giving them grandbabies, but they want to be celebrated

0:16:43.702 --> 0:16:45.102
<v Speaker 4>as a mother and a grandmother.

0:16:45.542 --> 0:16:46.142
<v Speaker 1>It's weird.

0:16:46.262 --> 0:16:49.222
<v Speaker 2>It's weird behavior. I don't know any women who would

0:16:49.222 --> 0:16:52.462
<v Speaker 2>be like that, but it's clearly a common feeling because

0:16:52.462 --> 0:16:54.822
<v Speaker 2>I saw another post from someone saying if you have

0:16:54.902 --> 0:16:57.582
<v Speaker 2>adult children and they have children, this day is no

0:16:57.662 --> 0:17:00.382
<v Speaker 2>longer about you, step aside, and I was like, oh,

0:17:01.102 --> 0:17:03.462
<v Speaker 2>I thought it was still about you, Mia. Isn't Mother's

0:17:03.542 --> 0:17:05.582
<v Speaker 2>Day still about you as well as about the mother

0:17:05.662 --> 0:17:06.861
<v Speaker 2>of your son's child.

0:17:07.101 --> 0:17:10.102
<v Speaker 1>It's funny you say that, because this mother's more than

0:17:10.101 --> 0:17:13.222
<v Speaker 1>any other. I felt the politics of it all in

0:17:13.262 --> 0:17:16.381
<v Speaker 1>that I wanted to see my mother in law. I

0:17:16.422 --> 0:17:19.421
<v Speaker 1>wanted to see my mother. Of course, I wanted to

0:17:19.462 --> 0:17:22.702
<v Speaker 1>see all of my children. But then my eldest son,

0:17:22.982 --> 0:17:26.502
<v Speaker 1>he also has a mother in law and I'm his mother,

0:17:26.621 --> 0:17:30.141
<v Speaker 1>but then he's also got to be the avatar for

0:17:30.542 --> 0:17:33.821
<v Speaker 1>his wife, who's a mother. And it's so funny because

0:17:33.821 --> 0:17:36.061
<v Speaker 1>on the day before Mother's Day, my mother in law

0:17:36.101 --> 0:17:39.381
<v Speaker 1>came over with flowers for me, and she always gets

0:17:39.422 --> 0:17:44.461
<v Speaker 1>her daughter and daughters in law flowers. And then I

0:17:44.542 --> 0:17:49.182
<v Speaker 1>suddenly thought, oh, I should get Jesse something from Luna.

0:17:49.542 --> 0:17:51.381
<v Speaker 1>And so I was like, I need to go to

0:17:51.462 --> 0:17:53.982
<v Speaker 1>office works and get a like a one of those frames,

0:17:54.022 --> 0:17:55.862
<v Speaker 1>and then I've got to put all the photos in it.

0:17:56.222 --> 0:18:00.581
<v Speaker 1>And then I was like, I'm too tired this idea

0:18:00.621 --> 0:18:04.142
<v Speaker 1>of now we've got to celebrate our children and our

0:18:04.502 --> 0:18:08.022
<v Speaker 1>daughters in law and sons in law for giving us grandback,

0:18:08.141 --> 0:18:10.422
<v Speaker 1>Like can I just have a of tea and some

0:18:10.462 --> 0:18:12.901
<v Speaker 1>toast in bed? Like what happened to that? Yeah? Have

0:18:13.101 --> 0:18:15.941
<v Speaker 1>made card a little past a bracelet. That's all I want.

0:18:16.422 --> 0:18:19.622
<v Speaker 2>That's exactly what I got, because life's got too complicated

0:18:19.702 --> 0:18:20.542
<v Speaker 2>over your way now.

0:18:20.942 --> 0:18:23.502
<v Speaker 3>I think when the pie starts to feel too small,

0:18:23.502 --> 0:18:25.942
<v Speaker 3>women turn on each other because it's like, there isn't

0:18:26.061 --> 0:18:28.941
<v Speaker 3>enough pie for you to be celebrated and me to

0:18:28.982 --> 0:18:32.942
<v Speaker 3>be celebrated. And as the mother of a small child,

0:18:33.581 --> 0:18:37.542
<v Speaker 3>she cannot yet say to me, mummy, you are doing

0:18:37.581 --> 0:18:39.542
<v Speaker 3>the best job in the whole world. You are the

0:18:39.542 --> 0:18:41.621
<v Speaker 3>best mum. I need my husband to be doing that.

0:18:42.101 --> 0:18:45.022
<v Speaker 3>So I think that's part of the etiquette rule, is

0:18:45.061 --> 0:18:47.942
<v Speaker 3>that if you have small kids, then someone in their

0:18:47.942 --> 0:18:50.421
<v Speaker 3>lives needs to do it because their child is not

0:18:50.462 --> 0:18:52.702
<v Speaker 3>going to do it for them. I was reading yesterday

0:18:52.742 --> 0:18:55.542
<v Speaker 3>about the story of how Mother's Day started. Have you

0:18:55.542 --> 0:18:56.542
<v Speaker 3>guys heard this story.

0:18:56.341 --> 0:18:59.141
<v Speaker 2>Before from the gift card company? No?

0:18:59.141 --> 0:19:02.821
<v Speaker 3>No, Colleen, you cynic. You're a cynic, Hollywayen right.

0:19:02.942 --> 0:19:03.061
<v Speaker 1>No.

0:19:03.502 --> 0:19:06.022
<v Speaker 3>It was started by a woman named Anna Jarvis who

0:19:06.061 --> 0:19:08.941
<v Speaker 3>decided to mark the day after losing her mum. And

0:19:08.982 --> 0:19:10.982
<v Speaker 3>this was at the beginning of the twentieth century. Her mom

0:19:11.022 --> 0:19:15.302
<v Speaker 3>died the year before, and she decided that it was

0:19:15.341 --> 0:19:19.581
<v Speaker 3>about celebrating the invisible work that mothers do in a

0:19:19.581 --> 0:19:23.662
<v Speaker 3>specific type of love, and really it was about for her,

0:19:23.742 --> 0:19:25.902
<v Speaker 3>it was about a mother that she'd lost, and then

0:19:25.982 --> 0:19:29.581
<v Speaker 3>she became the fiercest campaigner in the world to make

0:19:29.661 --> 0:19:33.341
<v Speaker 3>it stop. She hated Mother's Day. By the time of

0:19:33.341 --> 0:19:36.141
<v Speaker 3>her death, she was just like, make it stop because

0:19:36.182 --> 0:19:40.821
<v Speaker 3>she was revolted by how capitalism, yes commercialized, it became.

0:19:40.861 --> 0:19:44.821
<v Speaker 3>She was like, don't you dare jump on this flower companies,

0:19:44.861 --> 0:19:46.621
<v Speaker 3>That's not what this is about. It was meant to

0:19:46.661 --> 0:19:48.262
<v Speaker 3>be about just seeing each other. So she was the

0:19:48.262 --> 0:19:49.661
<v Speaker 3>biggest lobbyist for abolishing it.

0:19:49.782 --> 0:19:52.742
<v Speaker 2>In the end, I do send messages to my single

0:19:52.782 --> 0:19:54.941
<v Speaker 2>mom friends on Mother's Day because the ain't nobody bringing

0:19:54.942 --> 0:19:56.782
<v Speaker 2>them a cup of tea in bed. But the biggest

0:19:56.782 --> 0:19:59.821
<v Speaker 2>transition I noticed in my house is when your kids

0:19:59.861 --> 0:20:01.701
<v Speaker 2>are little and lunar, isn't they yet? But you've got

0:20:01.742 --> 0:20:05.061
<v Speaker 2>years ahead of this, as Mia just said, pastor bracelets,

0:20:05.262 --> 0:20:07.861
<v Speaker 2>twenty five tiny scrappy cards that they were forced to

0:20:07.861 --> 0:20:10.742
<v Speaker 2>make a primary school, and kindy lists of things at

0:20:10.821 --> 0:20:13.421
<v Speaker 2>my mom and then there's always something embarrassing like drinks,

0:20:13.462 --> 0:20:15.782
<v Speaker 2>wine in the kitchen or whatever it is that you

0:20:15.782 --> 0:20:17.941
<v Speaker 2>get loads of that. But then, because now both my

0:20:18.022 --> 0:20:20.702
<v Speaker 2>kids are in high school, crickets not of that, So

0:20:20.821 --> 0:20:23.542
<v Speaker 2>I this is what I did. I told them before

0:20:23.581 --> 0:20:26.901
<v Speaker 2>the day that I still wanted that shit. I was like,

0:20:26.942 --> 0:20:29.101
<v Speaker 2>I know, you don't have to go and do it,

0:20:29.302 --> 0:20:32.621
<v Speaker 2>and they did to a point. So needs expressed.

0:20:33.861 --> 0:20:36.141
<v Speaker 1>Gifts art my love language. But I'm strict about cards

0:20:36.621 --> 0:20:39.582
<v Speaker 1>and I expect them on my birthday and on Mother's Day.

0:20:39.661 --> 0:20:42.661
<v Speaker 1>Except this year, I actually decided, do you know what,

0:20:43.101 --> 0:20:45.982
<v Speaker 1>because I know that my kids just get exhausted, particularly

0:20:46.022 --> 0:20:48.782
<v Speaker 1>my male kids, get exhausted with the idea of writing cards.

0:20:49.381 --> 0:20:51.141
<v Speaker 1>So I was like, you know what, I'm fine, I

0:20:51.182 --> 0:20:52.542
<v Speaker 1>don't need it this year. And I said that in

0:20:52.581 --> 0:20:55.982
<v Speaker 1>the family group chat and then they all came up with, wait,

0:20:56.141 --> 0:20:58.982
<v Speaker 1>this is a trap. Yeah, this is a trap.

0:20:59.621 --> 0:21:02.181
<v Speaker 3>We've played this game before and it doesn't I was like, no.

0:21:02.022 --> 0:21:04.022
<v Speaker 1>No, no, it's not a test. It's not a trap.

0:21:04.101 --> 0:21:06.742
<v Speaker 1>I mean it. And then the next day, two out

0:21:06.742 --> 0:21:09.502
<v Speaker 1>of my three children did not fall for the trap.

0:21:09.702 --> 0:21:11.742
<v Speaker 1>Not that with the chap, but I got cards from

0:21:11.742 --> 0:21:14.302
<v Speaker 1>two of them and a present from one of them

0:21:14.302 --> 0:21:15.422
<v Speaker 1>that I know that Jesse bought.

0:21:15.942 --> 0:21:16.222
<v Speaker 2>I did.

0:21:16.262 --> 0:21:17.101
<v Speaker 3>It was a lovely gift.

0:21:17.381 --> 0:21:21.821
<v Speaker 2>I love it so much. Next a millennial superstar appears

0:21:21.901 --> 0:21:24.542
<v Speaker 2>to be in free fall. What is going on with

0:21:24.702 --> 0:21:33.181
<v Speaker 2>Justin Bieber. I've done things that have hurt others. I

0:21:33.262 --> 0:21:35.582
<v Speaker 2>sometimes worry I'm going to be exposed if I tell

0:21:35.621 --> 0:21:38.741
<v Speaker 2>people how selfish I am. And I've been really asking

0:21:38.782 --> 0:21:41.262
<v Speaker 2>God to help me see the best in people. This

0:21:41.502 --> 0:21:44.221
<v Speaker 2>is how some of the most recent posts from one

0:21:44.262 --> 0:21:46.382
<v Speaker 2>of the most famous men in the world and one

0:21:46.422 --> 0:21:50.821
<v Speaker 2>of the biggest millennial celebrities begin. If you follow Justin

0:21:50.942 --> 0:21:54.302
<v Speaker 2>Bieber on social and many hundreds of millions of people do,

0:21:55.182 --> 0:21:58.181
<v Speaker 2>you will have seen notes posts like those popping up

0:21:58.222 --> 0:22:01.901
<v Speaker 2>a lot on his feed lately, alongside blurry shots of

0:22:01.982 --> 0:22:06.342
<v Speaker 2>him dancing, eyes hardly open, clouds of smoke, pictures being

0:22:06.422 --> 0:22:09.822
<v Speaker 2>uploaded and taken down, many repeated shots of his golf

0:22:09.901 --> 0:22:13.262
<v Speaker 2>swing not sure what that's about, and plenty of picks

0:22:13.262 --> 0:22:15.942
<v Speaker 2>of his mates hanging around watching hockey and making sort

0:22:15.982 --> 0:22:19.701
<v Speaker 2>of repetitive soundless motions. If you're watching any of the

0:22:19.702 --> 0:22:23.061
<v Speaker 2>celebrity gossip sites, you're seeing a whole lot more Biber

0:22:23.141 --> 0:22:26.661
<v Speaker 2>clashing with paparazzi, Biber clearly out of it at Coachella,

0:22:27.141 --> 0:22:30.581
<v Speaker 2>and you're probably reading headlines about his involvement as a

0:22:30.702 --> 0:22:32.941
<v Speaker 2>child with p Diddy, who is about to be at

0:22:32.942 --> 0:22:36.101
<v Speaker 2>the center of a massive sexual assault trafficking court case.

0:22:36.621 --> 0:22:39.341
<v Speaker 2>You're hearing about legal clashes with his former management and

0:22:39.422 --> 0:22:43.022
<v Speaker 2>losing money on a canceled tour, and new music is

0:22:43.222 --> 0:22:46.061
<v Speaker 2>very hard to find. And after those posts that I

0:22:46.141 --> 0:22:48.381
<v Speaker 2>read out at the beginning today, which were the beginnings

0:22:48.381 --> 0:22:53.341
<v Speaker 2>of these sort of very introspective, very sad kind of reflections,

0:22:53.702 --> 0:22:56.821
<v Speaker 2>you're seeing a whole fresh round of fears for Bieber

0:22:57.101 --> 0:23:02.182
<v Speaker 2>headlines Jesse. We have seen millennial celebrities in personal freefall

0:23:02.222 --> 0:23:05.662
<v Speaker 2>on social media before, most notably, of course, Britney Spears.

0:23:06.061 --> 0:23:09.702
<v Speaker 2>What are you feeling about what's going on with Justin ba.

0:23:10.141 --> 0:23:13.461
<v Speaker 3>I think we've all had the experience of being on

0:23:13.502 --> 0:23:17.101
<v Speaker 3>social media and seeing someone that we're close to post

0:23:17.222 --> 0:23:21.021
<v Speaker 3>things that are unusual, that are out of character, that

0:23:21.141 --> 0:23:25.461
<v Speaker 3>might seem to be a call for help. When that

0:23:25.742 --> 0:23:29.181
<v Speaker 3>content is being posted by someone who is one of

0:23:29.222 --> 0:23:32.861
<v Speaker 3>the most followed people in the world on Instagram, that

0:23:33.222 --> 0:23:39.101
<v Speaker 3>becomes very unusual and an interesting thing for us to

0:23:39.182 --> 0:23:43.781
<v Speaker 3>grapple with. I think Justin Bieber he was discovered on

0:23:43.982 --> 0:23:47.262
<v Speaker 3>YouTube when he was twelve. He is now thirty one.

0:23:47.702 --> 0:23:54.102
<v Speaker 3>He has been famous for eighteen years, right, He in

0:23:54.182 --> 0:23:57.581
<v Speaker 3>fact was discovered in his career launched in the same

0:23:57.782 --> 0:24:01.182
<v Speaker 3>year that Britney Spears attacked that car with an umbrella.

0:24:01.462 --> 0:24:06.101
<v Speaker 3>And I think that there is something almost serendipitous about

0:24:06.141 --> 0:24:10.782
<v Speaker 3>that crossover because we have seen, you know, whether it's

0:24:10.821 --> 0:24:14.421
<v Speaker 3>mental health issues or the price of fame. We've been

0:24:14.462 --> 0:24:17.662
<v Speaker 3>discussing this since Judy Garland, Like this isn't entirely new

0:24:17.782 --> 0:24:21.221
<v Speaker 3>to our age, but we now see the cracks start

0:24:21.302 --> 0:24:26.101
<v Speaker 3>to show in real time via social media, and it's

0:24:26.262 --> 0:24:29.662
<v Speaker 3>really difficult because people can talk about sort of concern

0:24:29.742 --> 0:24:33.341
<v Speaker 3>trolling or pretending like you're concerned. But I was a

0:24:33.381 --> 0:24:35.901
<v Speaker 3>massive fan of Justin Bieber in those early days and

0:24:35.942 --> 0:24:40.302
<v Speaker 3>I really liked his music and to see the unusual

0:24:40.381 --> 0:24:42.262
<v Speaker 3>content that he's posting, because it can be kind of

0:24:42.262 --> 0:24:45.221
<v Speaker 3>hard to miss. Sometimes it's posted and then it's removed.

0:24:45.861 --> 0:24:47.782
<v Speaker 3>He will be half dressed, he'll kind of have his

0:24:48.381 --> 0:24:51.662
<v Speaker 3>arm in one side of his jumper. And then I think,

0:24:51.661 --> 0:24:55.501
<v Speaker 3>in particular the clips from Coachella most recently, where he

0:24:55.821 --> 0:25:00.141
<v Speaker 3>is clearly smoking weed and in one he's beside his

0:25:00.222 --> 0:25:02.462
<v Speaker 3>fifteen year old brother and it appears that Hailey Bieber

0:25:02.581 --> 0:25:05.741
<v Speaker 3>moves the brother out of the way. She seems to

0:25:05.742 --> 0:25:07.542
<v Speaker 3>be the one in all of those videos that are

0:25:07.581 --> 0:25:11.702
<v Speaker 3>often taken from fan or just people walking past who's

0:25:11.861 --> 0:25:15.461
<v Speaker 3>trying to keep the illusion that everything is okay. But

0:25:15.542 --> 0:25:19.502
<v Speaker 3>even from his posture to his facial expressions, he looks

0:25:19.542 --> 0:25:21.581
<v Speaker 3>like he's under the influence of something and like he's

0:25:21.742 --> 0:25:25.341
<v Speaker 3>not thriving. And there was a quote by an author

0:25:25.341 --> 0:25:27.662
<v Speaker 3>who wrote a book most recently about Britney Spears, who

0:25:27.702 --> 0:25:30.981
<v Speaker 3>said his name is Jeff Weiss, and he said that

0:25:31.381 --> 0:25:34.101
<v Speaker 3>Justin bieber at this stage of his life will have

0:25:34.381 --> 0:25:38.221
<v Speaker 3>basically never had an honest interaction with anyone because of

0:25:38.262 --> 0:25:41.141
<v Speaker 3>how early he found fame and how all of the

0:25:41.182 --> 0:25:45.101
<v Speaker 3>people around him have tried to leach off him. He's

0:25:45.381 --> 0:25:48.861
<v Speaker 3>fallen out with record labels and now he's independent, and

0:25:48.901 --> 0:25:52.702
<v Speaker 3>those people are actually saying he removes himself from anyone

0:25:52.742 --> 0:25:55.782
<v Speaker 3>who says no to him. I just don't know how

0:25:55.782 --> 0:25:59.422
<v Speaker 3>you navigate this and come out the other end as

0:25:59.581 --> 0:26:04.901
<v Speaker 3>a balanced, healthy person with your ego in check.

0:26:05.182 --> 0:26:10.222
<v Speaker 1>Beyonce, did It's possible Justin Timberlake much did?

0:26:10.302 --> 0:26:12.581
<v Speaker 3>He's had his own issues justin Timia, Yeah.

0:26:12.341 --> 0:26:17.461
<v Speaker 1>Of course, but not like this complete public immolation. I

0:26:17.462 --> 0:26:20.902
<v Speaker 1>think what's interesting is the we have to be sort

0:26:20.901 --> 0:26:24.621
<v Speaker 1>of euphemistic when we talk about mental health issues often,

0:26:25.702 --> 0:26:29.741
<v Speaker 1>and what about substance abuse, what about addiction? And I

0:26:29.821 --> 0:26:31.542
<v Speaker 1>know that those things can be blurry.

0:26:31.702 --> 0:26:35.022
<v Speaker 3>I think that substance abuse and addiction are so inextricably

0:26:35.061 --> 0:26:36.662
<v Speaker 3>tied to mental health issues, right.

0:26:36.621 --> 0:26:39.901
<v Speaker 2>Yes, But you know you were saying about stimisms, the

0:26:39.942 --> 0:26:43.982
<v Speaker 2>euphemisms in the mainstream media in inverted commas, the euphemisms

0:26:43.982 --> 0:26:46.341
<v Speaker 2>around what's going on with Justin Bieber. I feel like

0:26:46.381 --> 0:26:48.821
<v Speaker 2>the mainstream media is treating him with kid gloves in

0:26:48.861 --> 0:26:51.982
<v Speaker 2>a way. The commentary about what he was like at Coachella,

0:26:52.222 --> 0:26:55.742
<v Speaker 2>just saying things like he was seen smoking around his brother.

0:26:56.422 --> 0:26:58.821
<v Speaker 2>If you see those videos, this is not a guy

0:26:58.861 --> 0:27:01.181
<v Speaker 2>who's just had a joint in a beer. He is

0:27:01.341 --> 0:27:04.181
<v Speaker 2>barely conscious. And I think all the time, if that

0:27:04.302 --> 0:27:06.502
<v Speaker 2>was Hailey Bieber, who has they have a ten month

0:27:06.542 --> 0:27:09.182
<v Speaker 2>old baby, I think behaving like that in a public place,

0:27:09.182 --> 0:27:12.022
<v Speaker 2>can you imagine the headlines? But Mia, to your point

0:27:12.101 --> 0:27:15.261
<v Speaker 2>about the big stars like Beyonce and just In Timberlake.

0:27:15.901 --> 0:27:20.061
<v Speaker 2>You can't turn Fame off, but you could turn Instagram off,

0:27:20.101 --> 0:27:22.262
<v Speaker 2>couldn't you Like if you're just in Bieber. Do you

0:27:22.302 --> 0:27:25.661
<v Speaker 2>think there's a way that he could retreat from this

0:27:26.381 --> 0:27:27.581
<v Speaker 2>scrutiny and reality?

0:27:28.101 --> 0:27:30.461
<v Speaker 1>I mean, of course there is, but I mean we

0:27:30.542 --> 0:27:33.101
<v Speaker 1>even saw it with Britney Spears. You're talking about a

0:27:33.101 --> 0:27:39.422
<v Speaker 1>generation who that's their only ability to have direct contact

0:27:39.502 --> 0:27:43.181
<v Speaker 1>with the world and with their audience. Everything else is

0:27:43.222 --> 0:27:45.861
<v Speaker 1>what's written about them, or what's said about them, or

0:27:45.901 --> 0:27:48.861
<v Speaker 1>the photos that are taken off them and videos by

0:27:48.901 --> 0:27:52.262
<v Speaker 1>perhaps And you know, there's so many layers to the

0:27:52.341 --> 0:27:56.221
<v Speaker 1>Couchella vision, isn't there because Hailey Bieber was there, And

0:27:56.262 --> 0:27:58.461
<v Speaker 1>not that we want to make a woman responsible for

0:27:58.542 --> 0:28:04.101
<v Speaker 1>the actions of her partner, but the decision to allow

0:28:04.302 --> 0:28:07.981
<v Speaker 1>him to be in public in that way whenevery's got

0:28:07.982 --> 0:28:11.421
<v Speaker 1>their phones out, you know, it's just so sad and

0:28:11.462 --> 0:28:14.861
<v Speaker 1>it speaks to the struggle that must go on behind

0:28:14.861 --> 0:28:18.141
<v Speaker 1>the scenes for her, you know. And he's a new father.

0:28:18.262 --> 0:28:20.581
<v Speaker 1>That's the other thing. As you said, Ohole, that's just

0:28:20.702 --> 0:28:25.941
<v Speaker 1>so heartbreaking, and people don't seem to take into account.

0:28:25.982 --> 0:28:28.501
<v Speaker 1>I mean, people would be calling child services if that

0:28:28.542 --> 0:28:31.861
<v Speaker 1>was Hailey Biber, wouldn't they and expressing fear for the child,

0:28:31.861 --> 0:28:33.982
<v Speaker 1>But no one even mentions that he's a dad.

0:28:34.022 --> 0:28:38.422
<v Speaker 3>And by contrast, Hailey Bieber is so controlled, so together,

0:28:39.022 --> 0:28:41.661
<v Speaker 3>so standing up straight, never appears to be under the

0:28:41.661 --> 0:28:44.022
<v Speaker 3>influence of anything. And I reject what you say about

0:28:44.382 --> 0:28:47.542
<v Speaker 3>letting him out in public. I think that we even

0:28:47.742 --> 0:28:51.661
<v Speaker 3>saw this with Britney Spears, Like just because you're having

0:28:51.661 --> 0:28:55.221
<v Speaker 3>some struggles doesn't mean that you don't have agency that

0:28:55.262 --> 0:28:57.222
<v Speaker 3>you have the right to assert like.

0:28:57.542 --> 0:28:59.982
<v Speaker 1>Oh, I would say that he should not be in

0:29:00.022 --> 0:29:03.182
<v Speaker 1>public like that. There's just absolutely no way, there isn't

0:29:03.342 --> 0:29:06.022
<v Speaker 1>no one could argue that was a good decision for him.

0:29:06.502 --> 0:29:09.102
<v Speaker 1>And I'm not saying that she has the power. She's

0:29:09.142 --> 0:29:12.701
<v Speaker 1>not his guardian. She can't constrain him. There is no

0:29:12.782 --> 0:29:16.102
<v Speaker 1>conservativeship over him, and there is never any prospect of

0:29:16.182 --> 0:29:19.742
<v Speaker 1>that even being raised after what happened with Brittany. Back

0:29:19.782 --> 0:29:21.862
<v Speaker 1>to your point about Instagram, I think that you're talking

0:29:21.862 --> 0:29:25.102
<v Speaker 1>about a generation of stars, that and generation of people

0:29:25.182 --> 0:29:29.542
<v Speaker 1>not just stars, where Instagram and their connection to social

0:29:29.582 --> 0:29:32.102
<v Speaker 1>media is so intrinsic to who they are and their

0:29:32.102 --> 0:29:35.661
<v Speaker 1>identity that taking that away from them is almost a

0:29:35.702 --> 0:29:38.022
<v Speaker 1>breach of their human rights, Like according to.

0:29:37.982 --> 0:29:40.822
<v Speaker 2>Them, do you think that we've got a lot better

0:29:41.661 --> 0:29:44.421
<v Speaker 2>understanding how to talk about this stuff. You know a

0:29:44.462 --> 0:29:46.102
<v Speaker 2>lot of one of the reasons I think I said

0:29:46.102 --> 0:29:47.542
<v Speaker 2>before that I think a lot of the coverage of

0:29:47.582 --> 0:29:51.701
<v Speaker 2>Biba is sympathetic, and probably rightly so, because we do

0:29:51.862 --> 0:29:55.661
<v Speaker 2>understand the toll of child stardom. We do understand that

0:29:55.862 --> 0:29:59.302
<v Speaker 2>clearly he was in some very unhealthy situations. I mean

0:29:59.342 --> 0:30:02.142
<v Speaker 2>the P Diddy stuff for starters, But he's talked himself

0:30:02.142 --> 0:30:05.142
<v Speaker 2>about mental health, about drug abuse, about physical health. We're

0:30:05.222 --> 0:30:07.221
<v Speaker 2>much more literate. I think we've moved on from the

0:30:07.222 --> 0:30:08.902
<v Speaker 2>place where we used to just be but you've got

0:30:08.942 --> 0:30:11.222
<v Speaker 2>everything well happy, Like I think we're out of that.

0:30:11.902 --> 0:30:14.702
<v Speaker 2>But now what do we do? And when I say,

0:30:14.822 --> 0:30:16.862
<v Speaker 2>I mean maybe we don't do anything, but I mean

0:30:17.661 --> 0:30:22.102
<v Speaker 2>watching somebody disintegrate like this in public while generally professing

0:30:22.102 --> 0:30:24.622
<v Speaker 2>that everything's okay. Like one of the only link on

0:30:24.742 --> 0:30:27.422
<v Speaker 2>Justin Bieber's Instagram that he sends you to is one

0:30:27.542 --> 0:30:31.342
<v Speaker 2>for a prayer app for example, right generally sort of

0:30:31.342 --> 0:30:35.422
<v Speaker 2>suggesting that everything's okay. What should people do?

0:30:35.622 --> 0:30:35.701
<v Speaker 4>Like?

0:30:35.862 --> 0:30:39.221
<v Speaker 2>Is it the kindest thing to turn away? Is it

0:30:39.262 --> 0:30:41.022
<v Speaker 2>the kindest thing to engage?

0:30:41.742 --> 0:30:44.221
<v Speaker 3>That's a very good point that you've made about the

0:30:44.302 --> 0:30:47.102
<v Speaker 3>p Diddy element, because there's a lot that we don't know,

0:30:47.142 --> 0:30:49.102
<v Speaker 3>but we know that Justin Bieber as a young man

0:30:49.382 --> 0:30:52.262
<v Speaker 3>had close proximity to P Diddy, who is now Obviously

0:30:52.302 --> 0:30:54.142
<v Speaker 3>there are a lot of allegations against him and the

0:30:54.142 --> 0:30:54.822
<v Speaker 3>parties that he.

0:30:54.822 --> 0:30:57.022
<v Speaker 2>Had to Just add to that, Jesse is some people

0:30:57.102 --> 0:31:00.622
<v Speaker 2>have been not necessarily suggesting any direct abuse, but saying

0:31:00.622 --> 0:31:02.702
<v Speaker 2>that from a very young age moving in that circle,

0:31:02.742 --> 0:31:06.582
<v Speaker 2>he was introduced to lots of very inappropriate situations at

0:31:06.622 --> 0:31:09.102
<v Speaker 2>a time in life when he was not able to

0:31:09.142 --> 0:31:11.382
<v Speaker 2>cope with and drugs are included in that. Of course,

0:31:11.542 --> 0:31:11.902
<v Speaker 2>it is.

0:31:11.822 --> 0:31:13.302
<v Speaker 3>As though a lot of people are waiting for the

0:31:13.302 --> 0:31:16.622
<v Speaker 3>Britney Spears moment, or are waiting for the moment when do.

0:31:16.542 --> 0:31:18.342
<v Speaker 1>You mean the umbrella moment? I mean we're watching it

0:31:18.382 --> 0:31:19.421
<v Speaker 1>in real time surely.

0:31:19.822 --> 0:31:20.622
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:31:20.661 --> 0:31:25.542
<v Speaker 3>And people who know addicts or people who struggle with

0:31:25.582 --> 0:31:28.982
<v Speaker 3>severe mental health issues will relate to this that it's

0:31:29.062 --> 0:31:31.461
<v Speaker 3>like when will the moment come and what will the

0:31:31.502 --> 0:31:34.302
<v Speaker 3>moment look like? Because there are other parts of it

0:31:34.342 --> 0:31:38.342
<v Speaker 3>where Justin Bieber recently was approached by paparazzi and people

0:31:38.342 --> 0:31:40.982
<v Speaker 3>are sharing this video saying, oh, he doesn't seem all right,

0:31:41.062 --> 0:31:44.382
<v Speaker 3>but He basically looked at the paparazzi and said, money, money, money,

0:31:44.382 --> 0:31:46.422
<v Speaker 3>that's all you care about. You don't care about humanity.

0:31:46.862 --> 0:31:49.582
<v Speaker 3>I thought, that's totally coherent and makes sense to me.

0:31:49.782 --> 0:31:53.022
<v Speaker 3>He's been frustrated by the paparazzi for most of his life.

0:31:53.542 --> 0:31:56.062
<v Speaker 3>But he also in an interview a few years ago,

0:31:56.142 --> 0:31:58.502
<v Speaker 3>he was talking about Billie Eilish and he became really

0:31:58.622 --> 0:32:01.982
<v Speaker 3>teary in it and said, I just want to protect her.

0:32:02.582 --> 0:32:04.382
<v Speaker 3>It was hard for me being that young and being

0:32:04.422 --> 0:32:06.302
<v Speaker 3>in the industry and not knowing where to turn and

0:32:06.342 --> 0:32:08.702
<v Speaker 3>everyone telling me they loved me and turning their back

0:32:08.742 --> 0:32:12.102
<v Speaker 3>on you in a secon There's this theory about fame

0:32:12.262 --> 0:32:14.862
<v Speaker 3>that for the people who are plucked out of obscurity.

0:32:15.502 --> 0:32:17.902
<v Speaker 3>Britney Spears and Justin Bieber are two of the best

0:32:17.942 --> 0:32:21.782
<v Speaker 3>examples of this, whose families did not have a lot

0:32:21.782 --> 0:32:25.502
<v Speaker 3>of resources, who had no experience with fame, who were

0:32:25.542 --> 0:32:29.622
<v Speaker 3>thrust into the limelight overnight, did not have the infrastructure

0:32:29.661 --> 0:32:31.902
<v Speaker 3>to deal with any of this, and in fact, with

0:32:31.982 --> 0:32:34.382
<v Speaker 3>a lot of the criticism about the NEPO babies, even

0:32:34.542 --> 0:32:37.502
<v Speaker 3>Hailey Bieber, she had some context, like she had people

0:32:37.542 --> 0:32:40.822
<v Speaker 3>in her family who understood how we deal with this,

0:32:41.342 --> 0:32:44.302
<v Speaker 3>maybe had contacts with the right people, knew when to

0:32:44.342 --> 0:32:46.382
<v Speaker 3>turn comments off and when not to post in all

0:32:46.422 --> 0:32:50.622
<v Speaker 3>of this, and it's like Bieber never inherited that knowledge,

0:32:50.622 --> 0:32:52.661
<v Speaker 3>and they're the people I probably worry about the most.

0:32:52.982 --> 0:32:55.261
<v Speaker 1>For those not familiar with Hailey Bieber, of course, she

0:32:55.942 --> 0:32:59.022
<v Speaker 1>was Hailey Baldwin. She is the niece of Alec Baldwin

0:32:59.102 --> 0:33:02.622
<v Speaker 1>and the daughter of one of his brothers, whose nac

0:33:02.661 --> 0:33:04.862
<v Speaker 1>dary I get all the Baldwines a bit confused. But

0:33:05.062 --> 0:33:07.782
<v Speaker 1>she is also an incredible beauty entrepreneur. She's got a

0:33:07.782 --> 0:33:11.701
<v Speaker 1>beauty business called Road which is apparently set to be

0:33:11.782 --> 0:33:15.822
<v Speaker 1>sold for you know, billions of dollars potentially coming up.

0:33:15.862 --> 0:33:19.102
<v Speaker 1>And you're right, she's always the absolute antithesis of him

0:33:19.622 --> 0:33:24.022
<v Speaker 1>in how she holds herself together publicly, and you know,

0:33:24.142 --> 0:33:26.142
<v Speaker 1>has quite a mask in public which you can really

0:33:26.182 --> 0:33:29.102
<v Speaker 1>really understand. But you know, it wasn't long ago that

0:33:29.142 --> 0:33:32.222
<v Speaker 1>we lost lie in pain right from one direction, and

0:33:32.782 --> 0:33:35.181
<v Speaker 1>everything that was going on there that we didn't see

0:33:35.542 --> 0:33:38.102
<v Speaker 1>play out in real time. If you didn't know him,

0:33:38.661 --> 0:33:41.622
<v Speaker 1>looking at his Instagram and you know, even the paparazzi shots,

0:33:41.622 --> 0:33:44.102
<v Speaker 1>you would not have known what was going on behind

0:33:44.102 --> 0:33:47.741
<v Speaker 1>the scenes. It doesn't look like a good industry to

0:33:47.782 --> 0:33:50.222
<v Speaker 1>get involved in if you're a kid, does it no?

0:33:50.462 --> 0:33:53.022
<v Speaker 2>And it also looks like fame is one of those

0:33:53.022 --> 0:33:55.461
<v Speaker 2>things that even though we've heard this story, as you

0:33:55.502 --> 0:33:58.062
<v Speaker 2>made the point at the beginning, Jesse with Judy Garland,

0:33:58.342 --> 0:34:00.582
<v Speaker 2>even though we've heard this story over and over again,

0:34:00.661 --> 0:34:04.862
<v Speaker 2>it's something that people desperately want and desperately chase, even

0:34:04.902 --> 0:34:07.062
<v Speaker 2>though they know it's desperately bad for them.

0:34:07.862 --> 0:34:10.782
<v Speaker 3>After the break, the high profile artist who had some

0:34:10.902 --> 0:34:13.701
<v Speaker 3>feedback for his audience at a recent concert, We will

0:34:13.702 --> 0:34:14.342
<v Speaker 3>tell you more.

0:34:14.182 --> 0:34:14.702
<v Speaker 1>In a moment.

0:34:15.182 --> 0:34:18.942
<v Speaker 2>One unlimited out loud access. We drop episodes every Tuesday

0:34:18.982 --> 0:34:23.062
<v Speaker 2>and Thursday exclusively for Mamma Mia subscribers. Follow the link

0:34:23.062 --> 0:34:24.822
<v Speaker 2>at the show notes to get us in your ears

0:34:25.062 --> 0:34:27.821
<v Speaker 2>five days a week. And a huge thank you to

0:34:27.982 --> 0:34:37.102
<v Speaker 2>all our current subscribers into mine.

0:34:39.261 --> 0:34:44.462
<v Speaker 3>All Nick cave Write a musician an actor wants you

0:34:44.502 --> 0:34:48.461
<v Speaker 3>to put your goddamn phone away at concerts. Earlier this month,

0:34:48.542 --> 0:34:51.302
<v Speaker 3>the sixty seven year old was performing in the US

0:34:51.701 --> 0:34:54.382
<v Speaker 3>when he knocked a phone out of a fan's hand

0:34:54.462 --> 0:34:58.982
<v Speaker 3>in frustration. There are reports that he has been frequently

0:34:59.102 --> 0:35:01.982
<v Speaker 3>imploring fans to put away their phones during performances on

0:35:02.022 --> 0:35:05.302
<v Speaker 3>this tour and instead try to connect with the music.

0:35:06.261 --> 0:35:08.821
<v Speaker 3>Cave is not the only artist who has had enough

0:35:08.942 --> 0:35:12.062
<v Speaker 3>with the phones. Randy Blythe, who is the lead singer

0:35:12.142 --> 0:35:15.181
<v Speaker 3>of a heavy metal band called Lamb of God, said

0:35:15.302 --> 0:35:18.221
<v Speaker 3>in a podcast interview last year, this is a quote.

0:35:18.582 --> 0:35:20.102
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna set it down in the middle of the

0:35:20.102 --> 0:35:21.902
<v Speaker 3>stage after a song or two, and then I'm going

0:35:21.982 --> 0:35:24.022
<v Speaker 3>to turn on my phone and I'm going to point

0:35:24.062 --> 0:35:25.981
<v Speaker 3>it at the audience and I'm going to sit there

0:35:26.022 --> 0:35:27.861
<v Speaker 3>and I'm going to sing a whole song. I'm not

0:35:27.902 --> 0:35:30.341
<v Speaker 3>gonna move. I'm going to do what they do. And

0:35:30.382 --> 0:35:32.181
<v Speaker 3>then at the end, I'm going to say, did you

0:35:32.221 --> 0:35:33.022
<v Speaker 3>people enjoy that?

0:35:33.502 --> 0:35:33.661
<v Speaker 1>No?

0:35:33.942 --> 0:35:36.702
<v Speaker 3>I didn't either, So why don't we be here together?

0:35:37.022 --> 0:35:41.422
<v Speaker 3>Put your frickin' phone down. I had never considered before

0:35:41.582 --> 0:35:44.861
<v Speaker 3>what the experience of everyone watching a concert through their

0:35:44.902 --> 0:35:49.342
<v Speaker 3>phones would be like for the actual performer you perform,

0:35:49.661 --> 0:35:53.822
<v Speaker 3>especially like a Nick Cave who is a certified artiste,

0:35:54.302 --> 0:35:57.261
<v Speaker 3>because you want to connect and you want to see faces,

0:35:57.462 --> 0:36:02.582
<v Speaker 3>and instead they're being confronted with thousands of screens. Holly,

0:36:02.741 --> 0:36:04.661
<v Speaker 3>do you reckon that? Everyone should just put their phone down.

0:36:04.741 --> 0:36:05.422
<v Speaker 3>Isn't that simple.

0:36:05.781 --> 0:36:08.741
<v Speaker 2>I think everybody should put their phone down, not necessarily

0:36:08.741 --> 0:36:11.661
<v Speaker 2>because of the sense of artists, but because most of us.

0:36:12.102 --> 0:36:14.941
<v Speaker 2>Unless you're in the front row at a concert and

0:36:14.982 --> 0:36:17.341
<v Speaker 2>you get amazing footage that you can share with the

0:36:17.342 --> 0:36:19.181
<v Speaker 2>world and they all go, wow, that's what it's like

0:36:19.261 --> 0:36:21.741
<v Speaker 2>being front row. Taylors with what you actually get at

0:36:21.741 --> 0:36:24.422
<v Speaker 2>most concerts that you spent your whole night filming is

0:36:24.502 --> 0:36:26.821
<v Speaker 2>like a couple of blurry dots in the background and

0:36:26.902 --> 0:36:31.661
<v Speaker 2>your terrible voice really really loudly screaming the lyrics to

0:36:31.701 --> 0:36:35.181
<v Speaker 2>your favorite song, and then you're looking back and you're like,

0:36:35.622 --> 0:36:37.661
<v Speaker 2>why did I film that? I Am never going to

0:36:37.741 --> 0:36:41.062
<v Speaker 2>look at that ever again. So yes, I do. But

0:36:41.862 --> 0:36:45.142
<v Speaker 2>some artists do band phones, right, so Alicia Keys, Jack White,

0:36:45.142 --> 0:36:47.741
<v Speaker 2>they've banned phones before. I've been a big performance. It's

0:36:47.781 --> 0:36:50.381
<v Speaker 2>not concerts true before where you have to put your

0:36:50.382 --> 0:36:53.142
<v Speaker 2>phone in a yonder pouch like one of those fum

0:36:53.582 --> 0:36:56.942
<v Speaker 2>black bags. And I think if you're powerful enough you

0:36:56.982 --> 0:36:59.861
<v Speaker 2>can do that. It's very expensive to do that, but

0:36:59.902 --> 0:37:02.341
<v Speaker 2>then it comes with a downside because don't you want

0:37:02.342 --> 0:37:04.461
<v Speaker 2>everyone to see how good you are in concert? Mia,

0:37:04.542 --> 0:37:05.182
<v Speaker 2>what do you think.

0:37:05.542 --> 0:37:09.382
<v Speaker 1>I think that when we film at concerts, it's actually

0:37:09.822 --> 0:37:12.422
<v Speaker 1>not about the person we're filming, but it's about us

0:37:12.542 --> 0:37:16.462
<v Speaker 1>and our identity. Because, first of all, one thing that

0:37:16.502 --> 0:37:20.422
<v Speaker 1>the iPhone and smartphones have given us is this obsession

0:37:20.422 --> 0:37:24.582
<v Speaker 1>with documenting everything. But the reason we document it is

0:37:24.661 --> 0:37:29.301
<v Speaker 1>around identity and wanting other people to understand us. So

0:37:29.302 --> 0:37:32.542
<v Speaker 1>it's not so much about you know. Megan Michael on

0:37:32.582 --> 0:37:36.622
<v Speaker 1>the weekend posted shots and video of her and Harry

0:37:36.661 --> 0:37:38.502
<v Speaker 1>at the Beyonce concert with some friends.

0:37:38.542 --> 0:37:40.661
<v Speaker 2>Did she me or I missed that? I know, you

0:37:40.701 --> 0:37:41.422
<v Speaker 2>know I missed that.

0:37:42.302 --> 0:37:44.861
<v Speaker 1>I actually love that she's posting this kind of content. Now.

0:37:44.902 --> 0:37:46.781
<v Speaker 1>I think it's exactly the kind of content that she

0:37:46.822 --> 0:37:49.982
<v Speaker 1>should be posting. But it's not just actually about Beyonce,

0:37:50.102 --> 0:37:52.502
<v Speaker 1>because as you say, oh, I couldn't see Beyonce, I

0:37:52.502 --> 0:37:54.942
<v Speaker 1>couldn't really see anything. I could just see her and Harry.

0:37:55.062 --> 0:37:57.582
<v Speaker 1>So I'm not singling her out for this. This is

0:37:57.582 --> 0:37:59.262
<v Speaker 1>what we all tend to do. I did the exact

0:37:59.261 --> 0:38:01.701
<v Speaker 1>same thing when I went to see Taylor Swift. I

0:38:01.781 --> 0:38:04.301
<v Speaker 1>wanted to say, I am a person who goes and

0:38:04.342 --> 0:38:08.661
<v Speaker 1>sees Taylor Swift, and I like Taylor Swift, and it

0:38:08.701 --> 0:38:12.782
<v Speaker 1>was about what that's about me more than the tailor

0:38:12.822 --> 0:38:15.102
<v Speaker 1>of it all. But from an artist's point of view,

0:38:15.342 --> 0:38:19.142
<v Speaker 1>I also think you're playing for an audience who've paid

0:38:19.181 --> 0:38:21.982
<v Speaker 1>money to see you there, right, So the people in

0:38:22.022 --> 0:38:25.622
<v Speaker 1>that audience probably like you if they've spent, in most

0:38:25.622 --> 0:38:28.862
<v Speaker 1>cases hundreds of dollars to come and see you. But

0:38:28.902 --> 0:38:31.622
<v Speaker 1>as soon as they film something and put it online

0:38:31.701 --> 0:38:33.941
<v Speaker 1>to people who aren't invested in you in any way,

0:38:33.942 --> 0:38:36.022
<v Speaker 1>who paid no money to see you, who weren't there,

0:38:36.062 --> 0:38:39.102
<v Speaker 1>who didn't see the whole thing, suddenly that footage can

0:38:39.102 --> 0:38:42.301
<v Speaker 1>become weaponized. And we've really seen that with Katy Perry recently.

0:38:42.982 --> 0:38:45.142
<v Speaker 1>With Taylor Swift, it was different. There was lots of

0:38:45.181 --> 0:38:49.861
<v Speaker 1>stuff posted, and her fans really enjoyed watching the concerts

0:38:49.942 --> 0:38:51.821
<v Speaker 1>in other places and it was a sort of a

0:38:51.862 --> 0:38:54.821
<v Speaker 1>sense of community. It wasn't weaponized and used to humiliate

0:38:54.862 --> 0:38:58.022
<v Speaker 1>her or make a point about her, But with Katy

0:38:58.102 --> 0:39:02.261
<v Speaker 1>Perry it was. And immediately you kind of breached the

0:39:02.302 --> 0:39:05.342
<v Speaker 1>intimacy of a concert. Even if there's tens of thousands

0:39:05.382 --> 0:39:08.302
<v Speaker 1>of people that are there, they're all in this contract

0:39:08.302 --> 0:39:10.982
<v Speaker 1>with the performer that they really liked the performer. So

0:39:11.062 --> 0:39:13.301
<v Speaker 1>it's a self selected audience, but the Internet turns it

0:39:13.302 --> 0:39:13.981
<v Speaker 1>into something else.

0:39:14.102 --> 0:39:17.901
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you strip it of all context, but there's a

0:39:18.022 --> 0:39:21.462
<v Speaker 3>propensity as well. And I am guilty of this as

0:39:21.542 --> 0:39:24.982
<v Speaker 3>much as anyone. That you have certain moments in life

0:39:25.062 --> 0:39:27.582
<v Speaker 3>where you think, I want everyone to feel what I

0:39:27.622 --> 0:39:31.422
<v Speaker 3>feel right now, and our impulse to capture that feeling

0:39:31.542 --> 0:39:34.262
<v Speaker 3>is to get our phone out. And it's always funny

0:39:34.302 --> 0:39:37.301
<v Speaker 3>because someone gets their phone out and takes a video

0:39:37.462 --> 0:39:39.062
<v Speaker 3>and no one can feel what you've felt in that

0:39:39.102 --> 0:39:41.301
<v Speaker 3>moment because they weren't in the room with you. In

0:39:41.422 --> 0:39:44.542
<v Speaker 3>saying that, Luca recently went and saw Hans Zimmer, who

0:39:44.582 --> 0:39:48.301
<v Speaker 3>is this incredible musician, and he came home and just said,

0:39:48.701 --> 0:39:51.102
<v Speaker 3>that was a spiritual experience. It was amazing. I loved it,

0:39:51.142 --> 0:39:53.422
<v Speaker 3>loved it, and it was a shame that I missed it.

0:39:53.462 --> 0:39:56.702
<v Speaker 3>I couldn't experience it with him. And we've been watching

0:39:56.741 --> 0:39:59.821
<v Speaker 3>tiktoks of it, and in fact I can feel it

0:39:59.862 --> 0:40:02.142
<v Speaker 3>a little bit. He did a lot of the music

0:40:02.181 --> 0:40:04.901
<v Speaker 3>behind The Lion King, and so seeing him do that

0:40:05.261 --> 0:40:09.861
<v Speaker 3>live and Interstellar and all of these incredible. It's an

0:40:09.942 --> 0:40:13.982
<v Speaker 3>orchestra on stage. Firstly, Luca can then show me what

0:40:14.062 --> 0:40:17.422
<v Speaker 3>he saw. And secondly, it is the best free publicity

0:40:17.462 --> 0:40:20.582
<v Speaker 3>any artist could ever hope for, because then that goes

0:40:20.661 --> 0:40:23.902
<v Speaker 3>viral and then you sell tickets, which is another reason.

0:40:23.982 --> 0:40:27.182
<v Speaker 3>I think probably a lot of artists are not saying

0:40:27.502 --> 0:40:28.942
<v Speaker 3>lock your phones away.

0:40:29.102 --> 0:40:30.901
<v Speaker 2>I think it should be up to them, though, don't

0:40:30.942 --> 0:40:33.502
<v Speaker 2>you like? I feel like if Nick cave like he

0:40:33.701 --> 0:40:36.782
<v Speaker 2>also at his shows in Lady Years, he also talks

0:40:36.822 --> 0:40:38.542
<v Speaker 2>a lot. He shares a lot about grief. It's one

0:40:38.582 --> 0:40:40.142
<v Speaker 2>of the things that's part of his show and is

0:40:40.221 --> 0:40:43.301
<v Speaker 2>sort of part talking, part music. And as you say, Jesse,

0:40:43.422 --> 0:40:45.422
<v Speaker 2>the idea of him doing that to just a wall

0:40:45.462 --> 0:40:48.901
<v Speaker 2>of screens, it would entirely change the experience. So I

0:40:48.942 --> 0:40:52.221
<v Speaker 2>sort of feel like the artist has every right to

0:40:52.302 --> 0:40:54.062
<v Speaker 2>tell you not to do it if they don't want

0:40:54.102 --> 0:40:55.062
<v Speaker 2>you to, don't you.

0:40:55.261 --> 0:40:57.542
<v Speaker 3>I reckon, it's got to be the policy. I mean,

0:40:57.701 --> 0:41:00.181
<v Speaker 3>you can have a policy that's put phones away. But

0:41:00.741 --> 0:41:04.461
<v Speaker 3>humans are, by nature we copy each other. So I've

0:41:04.502 --> 0:41:06.422
<v Speaker 3>been in situations where everyone has their phone out and

0:41:06.422 --> 0:41:08.381
<v Speaker 3>I go, oh, I guess we're filming this, and then

0:41:08.382 --> 0:41:09.942
<v Speaker 3>I kind of get my phone out and do the

0:41:09.942 --> 0:41:13.301
<v Speaker 3>same thing, which is what an audience will do. I

0:41:13.422 --> 0:41:16.181
<v Speaker 3>was looking at this story though, and for Nick Cave

0:41:16.261 --> 0:41:18.422
<v Speaker 3>to have knocked a phone out of someone's hand, they

0:41:18.502 --> 0:41:21.062
<v Speaker 3>must be pretty close, like to have.

0:41:21.142 --> 0:41:23.221
<v Speaker 2>Someone down arena shows. These are theaters.

0:41:23.302 --> 0:41:26.102
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, there is something intimate about that. There was footage

0:41:26.102 --> 0:41:28.941
<v Speaker 3>of him about six months ago saying film me, now

0:41:29.022 --> 0:41:31.982
<v Speaker 3>you've got your phones out, and then all of you

0:41:32.022 --> 0:41:34.861
<v Speaker 3>put your fucking phones away. Now the irony of that

0:41:35.502 --> 0:41:38.222
<v Speaker 3>is it guess how I know that happened. Someone filmed

0:41:38.261 --> 0:41:40.821
<v Speaker 3>it and put it on the internet. So everything you

0:41:40.862 --> 0:41:44.262
<v Speaker 3>say this has happened with Australian artists where they've gone

0:41:44.302 --> 0:41:47.661
<v Speaker 3>to make a point about a political issue on stage

0:41:48.142 --> 0:41:51.022
<v Speaker 3>that makes sense within context, that starts with one thing,

0:41:51.022 --> 0:41:53.181
<v Speaker 3>it ends with another thing, and you cut the fifteen

0:41:53.221 --> 0:41:55.181
<v Speaker 3>seconds and then that goes viral and then they get

0:41:55.221 --> 0:41:59.021
<v Speaker 3>canceled for something that wasn't all within context. I've felt

0:41:59.022 --> 0:42:00.901
<v Speaker 3>that at our live shows, where I've thought, oh, if

0:42:00.902 --> 0:42:04.942
<v Speaker 3>someone just filmed that twenty seconds, that would not be

0:42:05.102 --> 0:42:07.861
<v Speaker 3>very flattering, and it can make you feel unsafe and

0:42:07.942 --> 0:42:11.822
<v Speaker 3>make for a much worse show. If you don't want phones,

0:42:12.462 --> 0:42:14.781
<v Speaker 3>you probably just have to make it the policy and

0:42:14.822 --> 0:42:15.942
<v Speaker 3>say all phones away.

0:42:15.982 --> 0:42:18.741
<v Speaker 2>I don't think you can have both I agree.

0:42:18.582 --> 0:42:21.381
<v Speaker 1>Phones are the new autographs. Selfies of the new autographs.

0:42:21.422 --> 0:42:24.622
<v Speaker 1>It's like I was there. I had this proximity to

0:42:24.701 --> 0:42:29.382
<v Speaker 1>this person irl ironically not through a screen or you know,

0:42:29.701 --> 0:42:32.742
<v Speaker 1>through a speaker, but I was actually there. But something

0:42:32.741 --> 0:42:34.982
<v Speaker 1>that is not helpful to do if this happened to me.

0:42:35.102 --> 0:42:37.221
<v Speaker 1>A couple of weeks ago, I had a friend who

0:42:37.261 --> 0:42:41.022
<v Speaker 1>went to this concert, loved it, came back and wanted

0:42:41.062 --> 0:42:43.821
<v Speaker 1>to play everybody this clip from the concert. And I

0:42:43.862 --> 0:42:46.622
<v Speaker 1>was like, if I wanted to watch this person, I

0:42:46.622 --> 0:42:49.302
<v Speaker 1>would have gone to the concert. Like, I'm not that interested.

0:42:49.342 --> 0:42:51.022
<v Speaker 1>But then when someone hands you their phone and says,

0:42:51.062 --> 0:42:53.502
<v Speaker 1>watch this, you're a bit stuck.

0:42:54.181 --> 0:42:57.341
<v Speaker 3>There's another artist as well who has said you would

0:42:57.382 --> 0:42:58.821
<v Speaker 3>not believe how awkward it is. I don't know if

0:42:58.862 --> 0:43:02.062
<v Speaker 3>you've seen this online, but people at a concert and

0:43:02.062 --> 0:43:05.382
<v Speaker 3>they're not filming the performer, they're filming themselves.

0:43:06.622 --> 0:43:07.822
<v Speaker 2>Happened a lot of Taylor.

0:43:08.661 --> 0:43:10.422
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Taylor, that's constant.

0:43:10.942 --> 0:43:13.022
<v Speaker 2>I feel like there should be a window. I feel

0:43:13.022 --> 0:43:15.102
<v Speaker 2>like there should be a window that is allowed where

0:43:15.102 --> 0:43:18.422
<v Speaker 2>you go. Right, I'm about what's like we're about to

0:43:18.462 --> 0:43:20.542
<v Speaker 2>do shake it off or whatever we're about to do.

0:43:21.062 --> 0:43:25.781
<v Speaker 2>Everybody go Ham with your phones, but then come back

0:43:25.781 --> 0:43:29.062
<v Speaker 2>to us, because it does take you far away. And

0:43:29.102 --> 0:43:31.102
<v Speaker 2>I drove a whole car of teenagers back from a

0:43:31.142 --> 0:43:34.381
<v Speaker 2>concert recently and had to, to your point, Mia, listen

0:43:34.462 --> 0:43:38.982
<v Speaker 2>to their entire concert with again them screaming really loudly

0:43:39.102 --> 0:43:40.701
<v Speaker 2>at the top of their voice, and I know what

0:43:40.741 --> 0:43:41.701
<v Speaker 2>hell is now?

0:43:41.902 --> 0:43:43.862
<v Speaker 1>What They've playing their videos in the car.

0:43:43.701 --> 0:43:45.502
<v Speaker 2>Because they were just choosing which bits they were going

0:43:45.582 --> 0:43:47.341
<v Speaker 2>to post and their sharing with each other, and it

0:43:47.422 --> 0:43:48.381
<v Speaker 2>was very much the thing.

0:43:48.582 --> 0:43:51.741
<v Speaker 3>And it's just them just going aha at the top

0:43:51.781 --> 0:43:54.741
<v Speaker 3>of their voices, this artist said. He said, there is

0:43:54.822 --> 0:43:58.701
<v Speaker 3>nothing more awkward than watching someone film themselves. Listening to me,

0:43:59.261 --> 0:44:03.341
<v Speaker 3>it is the most It is no longer a connecting experience.

0:44:03.542 --> 0:44:06.262
<v Speaker 3>It is a bizarrely isolated one.

0:44:06.542 --> 0:44:09.102
<v Speaker 1>Out Louders, We'll be seeing you in Brisbane on Wednesday

0:44:09.102 --> 0:44:12.062
<v Speaker 1>this week and in Sydney on Saturday. What's going to happen?

0:44:12.062 --> 0:44:13.982
<v Speaker 1>Will you film us? We'll wholly knock your phone out

0:44:13.982 --> 0:44:17.702
<v Speaker 1>of your hand. Might Jesse flash you? Unlikely, but could happen.

0:44:18.221 --> 0:44:20.582
<v Speaker 2>A massive thank you out Louders for being with us

0:44:20.622 --> 0:44:23.181
<v Speaker 2>today on Monday's show, and to our fabulous team for

0:44:23.221 --> 0:44:25.781
<v Speaker 2>putting the show together a higher degree of difficulty when

0:44:25.822 --> 0:44:28.542
<v Speaker 2>we are all in different places. We are going to

0:44:28.582 --> 0:44:30.181
<v Speaker 2>be back in your ears tomorrow.

0:44:30.261 --> 0:44:31.821
<v Speaker 3>Bye bye bye.

0:44:32.701 --> 0:44:35.982
<v Speaker 1>Shout out to any Muma Miya subscribers listening. If you

0:44:36.142 --> 0:44:38.502
<v Speaker 1>love the show and want to support us as well,

0:44:38.701 --> 0:44:41.102
<v Speaker 1>subscribing to mom and Miya is the very best way

0:44:41.102 --> 0:44:43.142
<v Speaker 1>to do so. There is a link in the episode

0:44:43.221 --> 0:44:43.622
<v Speaker 1>description