1 00:00:10,614 --> 00:00:15,254 Speaker 1: You're listening to a Muma Mia podcast. Mamma mea acknowledges 2 00:00:15,334 --> 00:00:18,134 Speaker 1: the traditional owners of land and waters that this podcast 3 00:00:18,214 --> 00:00:18,934 Speaker 1: is recorded on. 4 00:00:21,974 --> 00:00:25,294 Speaker 2: Hey, I'm Taylor Straano. This is Mumma MIA's twice daily 5 00:00:25,334 --> 00:00:28,374 Speaker 2: news podcast, The Quickie. Today we're diving into one of 6 00:00:28,454 --> 00:00:32,814 Speaker 2: the biggest climate justice cases Australia has ever seen. But 7 00:00:33,094 --> 00:00:35,934 Speaker 2: before we get there, he's Clare Murphy with the latest 8 00:00:36,014 --> 00:00:38,774 Speaker 2: from the QUICKI News room for Friday July eighteen. 9 00:00:39,134 --> 00:00:42,414 Speaker 1: Thanks Taylor. Some parliamentary colleagues of former Labour leader and 10 00:00:42,614 --> 00:00:45,974 Speaker 1: X one Nation MP turned independent Mark Latham say he 11 00:00:45,974 --> 00:00:48,574 Speaker 1: would be sacked if he worked anywhere else, while others 12 00:00:48,574 --> 00:00:52,174 Speaker 1: are holding firm on collaborating with the controversial MP. The 13 00:00:52,174 --> 00:00:55,854 Speaker 1: one time Prime ministerial hopeful turned independent New South Wales 14 00:00:55,974 --> 00:00:58,774 Speaker 1: Upper House MP has been the subject of days of 15 00:00:58,854 --> 00:01:02,494 Speaker 1: reporting as his former partner, Natalie Matthews seeks an apprehended 16 00:01:02,534 --> 00:01:06,334 Speaker 1: domestic violence order against him. Mister Latham has rejected her 17 00:01:06,334 --> 00:01:10,134 Speaker 1: allegations of a sustained pattern of abuse and manipulation, which 18 00:01:10,174 --> 00:01:13,374 Speaker 1: includes allegations he drove a car at her and pressured 19 00:01:13,414 --> 00:01:17,134 Speaker 1: her into engaging in degrading sex acts posting online as 20 00:01:17,134 --> 00:01:19,734 Speaker 1: the old saying goes hell, hath no fury like a 21 00:01:19,774 --> 00:01:23,694 Speaker 1: woman scorned. Miss Matthew's private application, where she's seeking orders 22 00:01:23,694 --> 00:01:26,454 Speaker 1: preventing Latham from coming within one hundred meters of her, 23 00:01:26,854 --> 00:01:29,934 Speaker 1: is scheduled to be heard on July thirty. Mister Latham 24 00:01:30,014 --> 00:01:32,934 Speaker 1: posted on his social media a screenshot of a request 25 00:01:32,934 --> 00:01:35,774 Speaker 1: from The Sydney Morning Herald to comment over claims there's 26 00:01:35,814 --> 00:01:38,614 Speaker 1: a video of him and his partner involved in sexual 27 00:01:38,614 --> 00:01:42,654 Speaker 1: activity in his parliamentary office. Mister Latham posted his being 28 00:01:42,734 --> 00:01:46,054 Speaker 1: asked to dispute something they haven't seen but only told about. 29 00:01:46,334 --> 00:01:48,534 Speaker 1: He also wrote that there's no suggestion of any law 30 00:01:48,734 --> 00:01:52,294 Speaker 1: or all broken. Messages reportedly sent by mister Latham to 31 00:01:52,294 --> 00:01:55,414 Speaker 1: Miss Matthews from the floor of Parliament have also been published, 32 00:01:55,694 --> 00:02:00,174 Speaker 1: featuring photos and derogatory comments about female MPs. One shows 33 00:02:00,214 --> 00:02:03,094 Speaker 1: a picture of MP Lennie Patinos saying she looked pregnant 34 00:02:03,334 --> 00:02:06,854 Speaker 1: and bragging about pinching her backside. Another is of Liberal 35 00:02:06,974 --> 00:02:10,254 Speaker 1: MP Susan Carter saying she looked like a grim. Miss 36 00:02:10,334 --> 00:02:13,654 Speaker 1: Carter told reporters that mister Latham had called her to apologize, 37 00:02:13,814 --> 00:02:16,494 Speaker 1: saying she appreciated the apology but now it's time to 38 00:02:16,534 --> 00:02:18,414 Speaker 1: get on with the job people expect them to do. 39 00:02:18,934 --> 00:02:21,614 Speaker 1: Mister Latham posted on social media in response to the 40 00:02:21,654 --> 00:02:24,814 Speaker 1: messages being made public, not denying that he sent them, 41 00:02:25,054 --> 00:02:28,254 Speaker 1: but claiming the Daily Telegraph's campaign against him had come 42 00:02:28,294 --> 00:02:31,614 Speaker 1: down to the weird, woke and wowser, saying asking him 43 00:02:31,654 --> 00:02:33,814 Speaker 1: if it's sexual harassment to take a picture of a 44 00:02:33,854 --> 00:02:36,694 Speaker 1: woman in parliament, which the media, of course do all 45 00:02:36,734 --> 00:02:39,654 Speaker 1: the time. He accused the media of using his messages 46 00:02:39,694 --> 00:02:42,854 Speaker 1: out of context and cherry picking and missing in jokes. 47 00:02:43,214 --> 00:02:46,174 Speaker 1: Senior Government minister Rose Jackson said mister Latham should be 48 00:02:46,174 --> 00:02:49,774 Speaker 1: shunned by MPs across the political spectrum, saying she doesn't 49 00:02:49,854 --> 00:02:52,054 Speaker 1: like working in a workplace with someone who thinks that 50 00:02:52,174 --> 00:02:55,574 Speaker 1: kind of behavior is acceptable. New South Wales Premier Chris 51 00:02:55,574 --> 00:02:58,334 Speaker 1: Min's told reporters that mister Latham's alleged behavior in the 52 00:02:58,334 --> 00:03:02,454 Speaker 1: parliamentary chamber almost certainly broke standing orders if proven to 53 00:03:02,494 --> 00:03:05,574 Speaker 1: be true, and that the Privileges Committee should be investigating 54 00:03:05,614 --> 00:03:08,454 Speaker 1: these things. The government plans to call for an inquiry 55 00:03:08,494 --> 00:03:11,934 Speaker 1: into mister Latham oh so unrelated alleged abuses of parliamentary 56 00:03:11,974 --> 00:03:15,614 Speaker 1: privilege when Parliament resumes in August. One matter relates to 57 00:03:15,654 --> 00:03:19,214 Speaker 1: him revealing the medical information of another MP, Sydney Independent, 58 00:03:19,294 --> 00:03:22,454 Speaker 1: Alex Greenwich. It came after mister Latham was ordered to 59 00:03:22,454 --> 00:03:24,974 Speaker 1: pay one hundred and forty thousand to mister Greenwich in 60 00:03:24,974 --> 00:03:29,174 Speaker 1: September twenty twenty four over a sexually explicit and homophobic 61 00:03:29,254 --> 00:03:32,814 Speaker 1: social media post. The Federal Court found mister Latham's tweet 62 00:03:32,974 --> 00:03:36,894 Speaker 1: exposed mister Greenwich, who is gay and a prominent LGBTQI 63 00:03:36,934 --> 00:03:40,974 Speaker 1: community advocate, to a torrent of hateful abuse, including death threats. 64 00:03:41,414 --> 00:03:44,574 Speaker 1: Mister Latham resigned from Federal Parliament in two thousand five 65 00:03:44,734 --> 00:03:48,014 Speaker 1: after an unsuccessful campaign for Prime Minister as Labour leader. 66 00:03:48,294 --> 00:03:50,734 Speaker 1: He later left the party before being elected to the 67 00:03:50,774 --> 00:03:53,094 Speaker 1: New South Wales Upper House in twenty nineteen as a 68 00:03:53,094 --> 00:03:56,414 Speaker 1: one Nation member. He quit that party in twenty twenty three, 69 00:03:56,454 --> 00:04:00,774 Speaker 1: becoming an independent. His term expires in twenty thirty one. 70 00:04:00,814 --> 00:04:04,214 Speaker 1: Worried parents are looking for alternatives to childcare centers after 71 00:04:04,294 --> 00:04:08,374 Speaker 1: sexual abuse allegations were leveled against an educator. The quality 72 00:04:08,414 --> 00:04:11,214 Speaker 1: and safety of some large childcare services have been called 73 00:04:11,254 --> 00:04:15,294 Speaker 1: into question after Melbourne worker Joshua Dale Brown was charged 74 00:04:15,334 --> 00:04:19,934 Speaker 1: with dozens of sex offenses, including allegedly sexually abusing eight children. 75 00:04:20,294 --> 00:04:23,014 Speaker 1: Brown is known to have worked at twenty four facilities 76 00:04:23,014 --> 00:04:26,694 Speaker 1: between twenty seventeen and his arrest, with several centers added 77 00:04:26,694 --> 00:04:30,294 Speaker 1: to the list initially compiled by police. Another educator at 78 00:04:30,294 --> 00:04:33,734 Speaker 1: Milestone's Early Learning in tingalper and Brisbane has also been 79 00:04:33,814 --> 00:04:36,414 Speaker 1: since charged with indecent treatment of a four year old 80 00:04:36,414 --> 00:04:39,534 Speaker 1: in his care. The Four Parents collective, which formed in 81 00:04:39,574 --> 00:04:42,614 Speaker 1: the wake of the allegations, say that parents across Australia 82 00:04:42,654 --> 00:04:46,694 Speaker 1: are understandably shaken the news, sparking a coordinated push with 83 00:04:46,734 --> 00:04:50,054 Speaker 1: a petition of more than five thousand signatures, for childcare 84 00:04:50,094 --> 00:04:53,454 Speaker 1: subsidies to be paid directly to families who choose not 85 00:04:53,534 --> 00:04:57,134 Speaker 1: to send their children to traditional daycare centers. Four Parents 86 00:04:57,214 --> 00:05:00,214 Speaker 1: co founder Jen Fleming believes government grant should be widened 87 00:05:00,254 --> 00:05:04,494 Speaker 1: to include grandparents, nanny's oa pairs and co working spaces 88 00:05:04,534 --> 00:05:08,174 Speaker 1: that allow parents to keep children close. Federal Education Minister 89 00:05:08,254 --> 00:05:11,294 Speaker 1: Jason Clair says the government is not considering widening the 90 00:05:11,334 --> 00:05:15,814 Speaker 1: subsidy to include childcare provided by grandparents. A surprise jump 91 00:05:15,854 --> 00:05:17,934 Speaker 1: in the jobless rate could help cement the case for 92 00:05:17,974 --> 00:05:21,694 Speaker 1: an interest rate cut, delivering welcome relief for homeowners. According 93 00:05:21,694 --> 00:05:24,974 Speaker 1: to the Australian Bureau of Statistics, the unemployment rate bucked 94 00:05:25,014 --> 00:05:28,494 Speaker 1: market expectations, rising from four point one percent to four 95 00:05:28,494 --> 00:05:31,654 Speaker 1: point three percent in June. After its July meeting, the 96 00:05:31,694 --> 00:05:35,894 Speaker 1: Central Bank disappointed mortgage holders and shocked market economists by 97 00:05:35,974 --> 00:05:38,294 Speaker 1: opting to hold the cash rate at three point eight 98 00:05:38,374 --> 00:05:42,134 Speaker 1: five percent in a split decision. Creditor Watches chief economist 99 00:05:42,174 --> 00:05:46,734 Speaker 1: Ivan Colhoun says, combined with moderating inflation, the unemployment figure 100 00:05:46,854 --> 00:05:49,414 Speaker 1: means an interest rate cut was virtually locked in when 101 00:05:49,454 --> 00:05:52,774 Speaker 1: the Central Bank meets again in August. Ossie actor Margo 102 00:05:52,854 --> 00:05:55,934 Speaker 1: Robbie has shouted diners in a restaurant cocktails made from 103 00:05:55,974 --> 00:05:58,374 Speaker 1: her own brand of gin. The thirty five year old 104 00:05:58,494 --> 00:06:00,494 Speaker 1: was sharing a meal with the owners of the Australian 105 00:06:00,534 --> 00:06:04,614 Speaker 1: restaurant Bondi Green, ordering Palmes or Palmers, depending on where 106 00:06:04,654 --> 00:06:08,014 Speaker 1: you're from. Robbie, also joined by her husband Tom Ackerley. 107 00:06:08,254 --> 00:06:10,614 Speaker 1: As she left the restaurant the whole would start, insisted 108 00:06:10,694 --> 00:06:13,654 Speaker 1: on treating the room to a Papa Salt cocktail. One 109 00:06:13,694 --> 00:06:15,294 Speaker 1: of the people who was sitting at the restaurant at 110 00:06:15,334 --> 00:06:17,454 Speaker 1: the time said Robbie seemed to be having a great 111 00:06:17,494 --> 00:06:21,334 Speaker 1: time enjoying the classicalz cuisine. That's your latest news headlines 112 00:06:21,374 --> 00:06:23,614 Speaker 1: and if you're after more celebrity news, had to link 113 00:06:23,614 --> 00:06:26,454 Speaker 1: in our show notes for the spills daily entertainment headlines. 114 00:06:27,014 --> 00:06:31,334 Speaker 2: Thanks Claire. Next, the landmark climate case making waves beyond 115 00:06:31,374 --> 00:06:32,014 Speaker 2: our shores. 116 00:06:36,854 --> 00:06:39,734 Speaker 3: When I was growing up, it was beautiful oceans. You know, 117 00:06:40,174 --> 00:06:45,174 Speaker 3: we can swim when beautiful gardens, and it was a lie. 118 00:06:46,014 --> 00:06:49,454 Speaker 3: But Dan, we saw that it was changing. The beach 119 00:06:49,574 --> 00:06:52,374 Speaker 3: that we used to walk around. Retiller cousins of that 120 00:06:52,534 --> 00:06:55,294 Speaker 3: on Saibay was getting smaller. When you kind of think, 121 00:06:55,334 --> 00:06:56,894 Speaker 3: you know, we're all the shells. 122 00:06:56,534 --> 00:07:01,534 Speaker 2: Now, Imagine watching the place your family has called home 123 00:07:01,574 --> 00:07:06,414 Speaker 2: for thousands of years slowly disappear underwater. That's the reality 124 00:07:06,494 --> 00:07:10,534 Speaker 2: facing Torres Strait Islanders right now as rise seas fueled 125 00:07:10,534 --> 00:07:14,894 Speaker 2: by climate change eat away at their island homes. Enter 126 00:07:14,934 --> 00:07:18,254 Speaker 2: the landmark legal fight of Uncle Pabei and Uncle Paul 127 00:07:18,574 --> 00:07:21,974 Speaker 2: to elders representing their communities on the islands of Sibi 128 00:07:22,174 --> 00:07:23,854 Speaker 2: and Boygoo where we live. 129 00:07:23,934 --> 00:07:27,534 Speaker 1: No is You can learn ad like I've seen the 130 00:07:27,574 --> 00:07:33,534 Speaker 1: pictures of Lismo, same thing happening today by every monsutism. 131 00:07:32,014 --> 00:07:34,374 Speaker 2: In a case that's been watched by climate activists and 132 00:07:34,454 --> 00:07:38,334 Speaker 2: lawyers worldwide. They took the Australian government to court. Their 133 00:07:38,414 --> 00:07:42,814 Speaker 2: argument was simple that the Commonwealth has a legal duty 134 00:07:42,814 --> 00:07:46,054 Speaker 2: of care to protect Horror Strait Islanders from the effects 135 00:07:46,054 --> 00:07:50,654 Speaker 2: of climate change, especially when it sets national emissions targets. 136 00:07:51,294 --> 00:07:53,774 Speaker 2: On top of that, they wanted the court to formally 137 00:07:53,814 --> 00:07:57,934 Speaker 2: recognize the cultural trauma and loss already happening as sea 138 00:07:58,014 --> 00:08:03,414 Speaker 2: levels rise, threatening not just land, but identity and spiritual life. 139 00:08:03,534 --> 00:08:06,774 Speaker 2: The stakes felt huge. Some called it the climate equivalent 140 00:08:06,934 --> 00:08:10,174 Speaker 2: of the historic Marlbo case If You're I'm back In 141 00:08:10,294 --> 00:08:13,854 Speaker 2: nineteen ninety two. The Marbo decision changed legal history by 142 00:08:13,894 --> 00:08:18,014 Speaker 2: recognizing native title and overturning the myth of terranulius or 143 00:08:18,254 --> 00:08:19,094 Speaker 2: Nobody's land. 144 00:08:20,014 --> 00:08:25,494 Speaker 3: Best land came to me through my grandmother and her father. 145 00:08:26,814 --> 00:08:30,054 Speaker 2: Advocates hoped this case would do for climate justice what 146 00:08:30,174 --> 00:08:33,774 Speaker 2: Eddie Marbo did for Indigenous land rights. But on Tuesday, 147 00:08:33,854 --> 00:08:37,854 Speaker 2: the Federal Court handed down its long awaited judgment. Justice 148 00:08:37,854 --> 00:08:42,014 Speaker 2: Whigney acknowledged the existential threat of climate change and painted 149 00:08:42,014 --> 00:08:44,894 Speaker 2: oblique picture for the future of the Torres Strait if 150 00:08:44,934 --> 00:08:49,134 Speaker 2: emissions stay high. Scientists in the case testify that without 151 00:08:49,174 --> 00:08:54,574 Speaker 2: dramatic actions, some islands could be uninhabitable within twenty five years. Still, 152 00:08:54,734 --> 00:08:57,974 Speaker 2: the court said no. It found that setting emissions targets 153 00:08:57,974 --> 00:09:02,294 Speaker 2: and funding protective infrastructure are political decisions, not legal ones 154 00:09:02,454 --> 00:09:05,334 Speaker 2: that the court could order, and while the cultural loss 155 00:09:05,414 --> 00:09:08,374 Speaker 2: is real, Australian law at this stage won't recognize a 156 00:09:08,494 --> 00:09:12,174 Speaker 2: special legal duty to prevent it. It's safe to say 157 00:09:12,214 --> 00:09:15,894 Speaker 2: it was a profound disappointment for climate and indigenous justice movements, 158 00:09:16,294 --> 00:09:18,814 Speaker 2: but it's also part of a global legal trend that's 159 00:09:18,854 --> 00:09:22,734 Speaker 2: gaining momentum around the world. Groups are taking their governments 160 00:09:22,774 --> 00:09:26,254 Speaker 2: to court for failing on climate action. In the Netherlands, 161 00:09:26,254 --> 00:09:29,334 Speaker 2: back in twenty fifteen, the Dutch Supreme Court ruled that 162 00:09:29,374 --> 00:09:32,334 Speaker 2: the state had a legal duty to reduce greenhouse gas 163 00:09:32,334 --> 00:09:36,294 Speaker 2: emissions and ordered stronger action to protect its people. That 164 00:09:36,454 --> 00:09:41,014 Speaker 2: verdict inspired dozens more lawsuits, some successful, some not, from 165 00:09:41,054 --> 00:09:44,654 Speaker 2: young people to farmers to the Torres Strait islanders themselves, 166 00:09:46,574 --> 00:09:49,454 Speaker 2: and this brings up a vital point. Climate change isn't 167 00:09:49,494 --> 00:09:53,494 Speaker 2: just an abstract problem. Across the Pacific Island nations like 168 00:09:53,534 --> 00:09:58,014 Speaker 2: Tuvlu face a truly existential threat. Australia recently signed the 169 00:09:58,054 --> 00:10:01,894 Speaker 2: Australias tu Vulu Phllipili Union Treaty, a world first agreement 170 00:10:01,934 --> 00:10:05,854 Speaker 2: that recognized Twuo Vlu's ongoing statehood and sovereignty even as 171 00:10:05,974 --> 00:10:09,454 Speaker 2: rising seas threatened to swallow its land. As part of 172 00:10:09,654 --> 00:10:12,334 Speaker 2: of the deal, Australia has committed to assist Tuvalu in 173 00:10:12,454 --> 00:10:17,134 Speaker 2: major disasters, and most importantly, to provide a special visa 174 00:10:17,174 --> 00:10:20,014 Speaker 2: pathway for two Va Luin citizens who are forced to 175 00:10:20,094 --> 00:10:24,054 Speaker 2: leave the island due to climate impacts. This Mobility with 176 00:10:24,134 --> 00:10:27,454 Speaker 2: Dignity pathway means two Va Luins can live, work and 177 00:10:27,574 --> 00:10:31,294 Speaker 2: study in Australia as climate migrants, ensuring their culture and 178 00:10:31,374 --> 00:10:36,414 Speaker 2: community carry on even if their homeland becomes unlivable. It's 179 00:10:36,494 --> 00:10:40,054 Speaker 2: a historic step towards recognizing and supporting climate migrants, and 180 00:10:40,134 --> 00:10:42,694 Speaker 2: a sign that the world is slowly adapting, both in 181 00:10:42,814 --> 00:10:46,534 Speaker 2: law and in spirit as climate impact grows. While the 182 00:10:46,534 --> 00:10:49,134 Speaker 2: Federal Court's decision is a setback for Uncle Pabe and 183 00:10:49,214 --> 00:10:52,614 Speaker 2: Uncle Paul and their communities, the campaign for climate justice 184 00:10:52,654 --> 00:10:56,934 Speaker 2: doesn't slow down. The global spotlight is firmly on Australia. 185 00:10:57,054 --> 00:11:00,054 Speaker 2: Legal activists like our guest today founder of the Grata Fund, 186 00:11:00,094 --> 00:11:05,214 Speaker 2: Isabella Rhinikey are already strategizing about next steps, including appealing 187 00:11:05,254 --> 00:11:09,334 Speaker 2: the decision and pushing four reforms. Isabel, you've been there 188 00:11:09,734 --> 00:11:12,654 Speaker 2: the beginning. Can you explain this case to us? What 189 00:11:12,694 --> 00:11:14,214 Speaker 2: were you actually trying to prove? 190 00:11:15,134 --> 00:11:18,054 Speaker 4: The uncles and their legal team were trying to demonstrate 191 00:11:18,094 --> 00:11:22,254 Speaker 4: that the Australian government has been negligent in its approach 192 00:11:22,374 --> 00:11:25,174 Speaker 4: on climate change, and the way that they were going 193 00:11:25,214 --> 00:11:27,574 Speaker 4: about that was arguing that the government had a duty 194 00:11:27,574 --> 00:11:30,774 Speaker 4: of care to people in the Torrest rate on climate change, 195 00:11:31,054 --> 00:11:34,894 Speaker 4: that they'd failed that duty through their actions or really 196 00:11:34,934 --> 00:11:37,974 Speaker 4: in actions on climate change, and that they were ultimately 197 00:11:38,014 --> 00:11:42,014 Speaker 4: asking the court to order the government to reduce climate 198 00:11:42,014 --> 00:11:45,414 Speaker 4: pollution in line with what is necessary to protect the 199 00:11:45,454 --> 00:11:51,134 Speaker 4: Torost Strait from total destruction and or to properly resource 200 00:11:51,294 --> 00:11:53,214 Speaker 4: adaptation measures in the tourist rate. 201 00:11:53,774 --> 00:11:55,694 Speaker 2: Can you tell me a bit about where you and 202 00:11:55,854 --> 00:11:57,934 Speaker 2: the Grata Fund come into this story. 203 00:11:58,494 --> 00:12:03,134 Speaker 4: Grato was set up to support communities that are marginalized 204 00:12:03,334 --> 00:12:06,494 Speaker 4: to access the power of law and courts and the 205 00:12:06,534 --> 00:12:11,214 Speaker 4: public domain, and what we do is vie case funding 206 00:12:11,494 --> 00:12:16,494 Speaker 4: and impact strategy support to those communities bringing litigation. So 207 00:12:16,614 --> 00:12:19,374 Speaker 4: we started working with the uncles over five years ago, 208 00:12:19,934 --> 00:12:22,894 Speaker 4: after they had indicated that they were interested in bringing 209 00:12:22,894 --> 00:12:26,454 Speaker 4: a case like this to protect their communities and all Australians. 210 00:12:26,494 --> 00:12:30,454 Speaker 2: Actually, so this has been before the court for four years. 211 00:12:30,494 --> 00:12:32,854 Speaker 2: Why did it take that long to reach a decision? 212 00:12:33,454 --> 00:12:38,374 Speaker 4: Yeah, courts can be frustratingly slow. This case we started 213 00:12:38,374 --> 00:12:40,814 Speaker 4: it filed in October twenty twenty one, I was pregnant. 214 00:12:40,974 --> 00:12:43,934 Speaker 4: I now have an almost four year old, so she's 215 00:12:43,974 --> 00:12:46,814 Speaker 4: been a good timeline for the actual case and how 216 00:12:46,854 --> 00:12:49,854 Speaker 4: slow it has been. Partly why it's been slow is 217 00:12:49,854 --> 00:12:53,414 Speaker 4: because it's just so complicated the facts that the judge 218 00:12:53,414 --> 00:12:56,374 Speaker 4: had to get across, and so that meant the judge 219 00:12:56,454 --> 00:13:00,734 Speaker 4: traveled to the Islands, to Boygoo, to Siby, to Baju 220 00:13:01,094 --> 00:13:05,614 Speaker 4: and took evidence and heard directly from elders, and then 221 00:13:05,694 --> 00:13:09,134 Speaker 4: he went to Melbourne and heard from expert scientists. He 222 00:13:09,214 --> 00:13:13,014 Speaker 4: then had closing arguments up in Cairns. Then he did 223 00:13:13,014 --> 00:13:15,494 Speaker 4: take a fairly long time to make a decision, and 224 00:13:15,614 --> 00:13:17,734 Speaker 4: he did say I'll never forget in the last day 225 00:13:17,774 --> 00:13:21,134 Speaker 4: of the arguments that this was a case, the most 226 00:13:21,214 --> 00:13:25,294 Speaker 4: complex case with contested arguments he'd ever had. So we 227 00:13:25,374 --> 00:13:27,494 Speaker 4: knew it was going to take a while, but it's slow. 228 00:13:27,974 --> 00:13:31,774 Speaker 2: It's not just loss of physical land that was argued about. 229 00:13:31,814 --> 00:13:34,934 Speaker 2: It was also this idea of cultural loss too. Can 230 00:13:34,974 --> 00:13:37,054 Speaker 2: you explain a bit about what that actually means. 231 00:13:37,894 --> 00:13:41,854 Speaker 4: Yeah, of course, So for the uncles and the communities 232 00:13:41,894 --> 00:13:45,334 Speaker 4: and for all First Nations communities across the country, there's 233 00:13:45,374 --> 00:13:48,854 Speaker 4: a really special cultural connection with land which the courts 234 00:13:48,894 --> 00:13:53,534 Speaker 4: have recognized exists. That's recognized in multiple high court decisions, 235 00:13:53,854 --> 00:13:57,454 Speaker 4: and that's a recognition of those cultures that have this 236 00:13:57,614 --> 00:14:01,094 Speaker 4: very intimate spiritual relationship with land. And because of the 237 00:14:01,094 --> 00:14:04,334 Speaker 4: impacts of climate change, because it's going to be increasingly 238 00:14:04,374 --> 00:14:07,214 Speaker 4: difficult for people to live there, but it's already impacted. 239 00:14:07,494 --> 00:14:10,694 Speaker 4: Sacred sites are disappearing under the sea, for example, Sacred 240 00:14:10,774 --> 00:14:13,534 Speaker 4: traditional practices can no longer take place because of the 241 00:14:13,614 --> 00:14:16,414 Speaker 4: changes to the landscape. So the uncles were arguing that 242 00:14:16,414 --> 00:14:20,294 Speaker 4: the government has a responsibility to do something not only 243 00:14:20,374 --> 00:14:22,694 Speaker 4: because of the physical loss, but because of that spiritual 244 00:14:22,734 --> 00:14:25,054 Speaker 4: and cultural loss that's already happening as well. 245 00:14:25,574 --> 00:14:29,094 Speaker 2: So this case has been likened to the Marlbo decision. 246 00:14:29,174 --> 00:14:31,974 Speaker 2: People have dubbed it the Climate Marbo. Can you walk 247 00:14:32,054 --> 00:14:34,534 Speaker 2: us through how these two cases actually are similar. 248 00:14:35,654 --> 00:14:38,574 Speaker 4: So they're similar in a couple of ways. One is 249 00:14:39,054 --> 00:14:42,014 Speaker 4: that they both come from the Torres Strait. So Eddie 250 00:14:42,054 --> 00:14:45,014 Speaker 4: Marbo was a Chilishdaree islander man from an island not 251 00:14:45,054 --> 00:14:47,774 Speaker 4: far from Uncle Pabay and Uncle Paul, and his case 252 00:14:48,134 --> 00:14:50,854 Speaker 4: also had the court come out to the islands and 253 00:14:50,894 --> 00:14:56,374 Speaker 4: actually hear evidence from traditional owners firsthand. The other reason though, 254 00:14:56,454 --> 00:14:59,854 Speaker 4: that is parallel is because of the significance of what's 255 00:14:59,894 --> 00:15:03,214 Speaker 4: being argued and its attempt to push the common law 256 00:15:03,694 --> 00:15:05,894 Speaker 4: along and to really get the common law to catch 257 00:15:05,974 --> 00:15:07,934 Speaker 4: up with the reality of the facts, which is what 258 00:15:08,054 --> 00:15:11,854 Speaker 4: Eddie Marbo successfully did. But also before Eddie Marlbo's case 259 00:15:11,934 --> 00:15:15,534 Speaker 4: came the gove Land Rights case and that case failed actually, 260 00:15:15,734 --> 00:15:19,774 Speaker 4: but that case really paved a pathway for Eddie Marbo's 261 00:15:19,774 --> 00:15:20,734 Speaker 4: case to then win. 262 00:15:21,174 --> 00:15:24,174 Speaker 2: There's this precedent for these types of cases being brought 263 00:15:24,214 --> 00:15:26,494 Speaker 2: before courts, right, I mean, we think about what happened 264 00:15:26,494 --> 00:15:29,134 Speaker 2: in the Netherlands and twenty fifteen that felt kind of 265 00:15:29,174 --> 00:15:32,454 Speaker 2: like a catalyst for more people taking formal action against 266 00:15:32,494 --> 00:15:36,814 Speaker 2: climate change. It's worked in varying success around the world. 267 00:15:37,294 --> 00:15:39,054 Speaker 2: There was a lot of eyes on this case here 268 00:15:39,054 --> 00:15:42,534 Speaker 2: in Australia though, So where does that leave us now? 269 00:15:42,574 --> 00:15:46,414 Speaker 2: I mean, the decision was not ruled favorably for Uncle 270 00:15:46,454 --> 00:15:49,014 Speaker 2: Paul and Uncle Pubey, So what happens next? 271 00:15:49,934 --> 00:15:53,014 Speaker 4: So there are some really big elements of that case 272 00:15:53,054 --> 00:15:55,854 Speaker 4: that are wins in my eyes and are going to 273 00:15:55,934 --> 00:16:00,014 Speaker 4: go down as a landmark judgment around the world, notwithstanding 274 00:16:00,054 --> 00:16:03,214 Speaker 4: the ultimate loss on the legal points. And that's because 275 00:16:03,254 --> 00:16:06,734 Speaker 4: the government had some really strong rebukes from the court 276 00:16:07,054 --> 00:16:09,694 Speaker 4: on the facts of climate science and its impacts. So 277 00:16:09,854 --> 00:16:12,494 Speaker 4: the court said Tyres Strait Islanders are facing oblique future 278 00:16:12,494 --> 00:16:15,014 Speaker 4: if the government doesn't do more. The judge said that 279 00:16:15,294 --> 00:16:19,814 Speaker 4: the world faces an existential threat to global humanity if 280 00:16:19,854 --> 00:16:23,774 Speaker 4: governments don't do more, and also accepted basically every factual 281 00:16:23,854 --> 00:16:28,094 Speaker 4: argument presented by the uncles, including that the government fundamentally 282 00:16:28,134 --> 00:16:32,414 Speaker 4: failed to even consider climate science when setting climate pollution targets, 283 00:16:32,774 --> 00:16:35,894 Speaker 4: which is a pretty strong sort of language. So that's 284 00:16:36,054 --> 00:16:39,294 Speaker 4: really significant in itself. And also what significant is that 285 00:16:39,294 --> 00:16:42,734 Speaker 4: the court didn't say that this is impossible. It just 286 00:16:42,814 --> 00:16:45,734 Speaker 4: said not yet, that the law hasn't developed yet. And 287 00:16:46,014 --> 00:16:48,014 Speaker 4: the judge said a couple of things. He said, people 288 00:16:48,054 --> 00:16:52,534 Speaker 4: have pathways through protest and the ballot box and the 289 00:16:52,614 --> 00:16:56,334 Speaker 4: slow incremental change of the legal system and the law, 290 00:16:56,494 --> 00:16:59,574 Speaker 4: and so what comes next is all of the above. 291 00:16:59,854 --> 00:17:02,774 Speaker 4: We have been as communities across the country, as I'm 292 00:17:02,814 --> 00:17:07,294 Speaker 4: sure much of your audience has participated in protests using 293 00:17:07,334 --> 00:17:11,094 Speaker 4: their vote wisely and litigating. And for the uncles, I 294 00:17:11,174 --> 00:17:14,294 Speaker 4: know that appeal is definitely on the table. It's something 295 00:17:14,334 --> 00:17:16,374 Speaker 4: that they're looking at really closely with their lawyers now. 296 00:17:16,414 --> 00:17:18,534 Speaker 4: But there are also going to be other cases and 297 00:17:18,694 --> 00:17:21,174 Speaker 4: without a doubt, this case, whether it appeals or not, 298 00:17:21,214 --> 00:17:24,374 Speaker 4: will be a stepping stone, I believe to ultimate accountability 299 00:17:24,414 --> 00:17:26,694 Speaker 4: for the Australian government and for fossil fuel companies in 300 00:17:26,734 --> 00:17:27,294 Speaker 4: this country. 301 00:17:27,854 --> 00:17:30,294 Speaker 2: So we're waiting for the law to catch up with 302 00:17:30,654 --> 00:17:33,654 Speaker 2: the current plight of people like the Torres Strait Islanders. 303 00:17:33,934 --> 00:17:36,894 Speaker 2: But at the same time, Australia has welcomed and continues 304 00:17:36,934 --> 00:17:40,814 Speaker 2: to welcome climate migrants from Tuvalu, so in a way, 305 00:17:40,854 --> 00:17:43,894 Speaker 2: the government is acknowledging those impacts of climate change on 306 00:17:43,974 --> 00:17:46,214 Speaker 2: other parts of the world and the reality of it 307 00:17:46,294 --> 00:17:50,094 Speaker 2: displacing people, but not quite yet in our own backyard. 308 00:17:50,454 --> 00:17:53,174 Speaker 4: Well, the funny thing is the Australian government does acknowledge 309 00:17:53,214 --> 00:17:56,934 Speaker 4: the impacts on Torshaw Islanders. So mister Chris Bowen, the 310 00:17:57,014 --> 00:18:00,014 Speaker 4: moment that the decision came out, released a press statement 311 00:18:00,094 --> 00:18:03,094 Speaker 4: saying that they're different to the former government. They get 312 00:18:03,214 --> 00:18:07,214 Speaker 4: climate change, they understand how it's impacting people. Unfortunately, what 313 00:18:07,254 --> 00:18:10,414 Speaker 4: they haven't done is actually put out a response that 314 00:18:10,494 --> 00:18:13,974 Speaker 4: matches the need for the community. And so there's this 315 00:18:14,214 --> 00:18:16,254 Speaker 4: talking out of two sides of their mouth, because on 316 00:18:16,294 --> 00:18:18,134 Speaker 4: the one hand they're saying to the Pacific, hey, we 317 00:18:18,294 --> 00:18:19,934 Speaker 4: get it, We're going to do more. We'll give you 318 00:18:20,014 --> 00:18:22,814 Speaker 4: refugee visas for a handful of people out of Tuvalu. 319 00:18:23,174 --> 00:18:25,534 Speaker 4: We want to co host a big climate conference with 320 00:18:25,574 --> 00:18:27,974 Speaker 4: you in Australia for the world next year. But on 321 00:18:28,014 --> 00:18:30,054 Speaker 4: the other hand, they're fighting their own people who are 322 00:18:30,054 --> 00:18:32,894 Speaker 4: experiencing the exact same situation in court to try and 323 00:18:32,894 --> 00:18:34,014 Speaker 4: get out of accountability. 324 00:18:34,694 --> 00:18:36,854 Speaker 2: So when does the government owe a duty of care 325 00:18:37,054 --> 00:18:38,774 Speaker 2: to climate vulnerable people? 326 00:18:39,294 --> 00:18:41,814 Speaker 4: I would say it already does, and that this is 327 00:18:41,854 --> 00:18:46,134 Speaker 4: a moral position that exists that is really irrefutable, and 328 00:18:46,174 --> 00:18:48,734 Speaker 4: I don't believe the government would deny that either. The 329 00:18:48,814 --> 00:18:50,774 Speaker 4: question is just what is it going to take for 330 00:18:50,814 --> 00:18:53,414 Speaker 4: them to follow through on that moral obligation. Is it 331 00:18:53,454 --> 00:18:55,614 Speaker 4: going to be the finding of a legal obligation or 332 00:18:55,694 --> 00:18:58,974 Speaker 4: can they actually do it before really using the emotional 333 00:18:59,134 --> 00:19:02,174 Speaker 4: resources of so many people in communities to fight them 334 00:19:02,174 --> 00:19:05,214 Speaker 4: through court. Governments shouldn't have to be litigated to do 335 00:19:05,334 --> 00:19:06,974 Speaker 4: the right thing on climate change. 336 00:19:08,134 --> 00:19:10,294 Speaker 2: Thanks for taking some time to feed your mind with 337 00:19:10,374 --> 00:19:13,014 Speaker 2: us today. The Quikie is produced by me Taylor Strano 338 00:19:13,134 --> 00:19:16,094 Speaker 2: and Cleare Murphy, with audio production by Lou Hill.