WEBVTT - Karen Read Found Not Guilty In Viral Murder Trial

0:00:06.552 --> 0:00:10.072
<v Speaker 1>True Crime Conversations acknowledges the traditional owners of land and

0:00:10.152 --> 0:00:14.192
<v Speaker 1>waters that this podcast was recorded on. Hey, True crime listeners.

0:00:14.312 --> 0:00:16.152
<v Speaker 1>As you may have seen, there has been a major

0:00:16.232 --> 0:00:18.671
<v Speaker 1>update in the Karen Read case, and we're going to

0:00:18.672 --> 0:00:20.592
<v Speaker 1>bring you up to speed on that so you can

0:00:20.672 --> 0:00:22.792
<v Speaker 1>better understand what this case is about. We are re

0:00:22.792 --> 0:00:25.951
<v Speaker 1>releasing our episode featuring Jessica Lowther from the Law and

0:00:25.992 --> 0:00:29.072
<v Speaker 1>Crime Network and producer of the hit podcast series Karen.

0:00:29.712 --> 0:00:33.751
<v Speaker 1>After a second trial and five days of jury deliberations,

0:00:33.992 --> 0:00:37.232
<v Speaker 1>Karen Reid has been found not guilty of second degree

0:00:37.272 --> 0:00:39.471
<v Speaker 1>murder and leaving the scene of an accident in the

0:00:39.512 --> 0:00:42.791
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty two death of her boyfriend, Boston police officer

0:00:42.912 --> 0:00:47.031
<v Speaker 1>John O'Keefe. She was convicted only of one driving offense,

0:00:47.031 --> 0:00:49.551
<v Speaker 1>and that's driving under the influence, and sentenced to one

0:00:49.592 --> 0:00:52.672
<v Speaker 1>year of probation. This verdict marks the end of a

0:00:52.751 --> 0:00:56.392
<v Speaker 1>high profile case that captured global attention and went viral

0:00:56.472 --> 0:01:00.112
<v Speaker 1>on TikTok, drawing in true crime fanatics and sparking fierce

0:01:00.112 --> 0:01:05.071
<v Speaker 1>debate online. Outside the courtroom in Massachusetts, Reid thanked her supporters,

0:01:05.112 --> 0:01:09.112
<v Speaker 1>but despite the legal conclusion, questions still linger about what

0:01:09.272 --> 0:01:12.472
<v Speaker 1>really happened that night. In July twenty twenty four, her

0:01:12.551 --> 0:01:15.351
<v Speaker 1>first trial ended in a mistrial due to a hung jury.

0:01:15.752 --> 0:01:19.712
<v Speaker 1>Throughout both trials, Reid maintained her innocence, alleging she was

0:01:19.752 --> 0:01:22.872
<v Speaker 1>the victim of a cover up involving local police and officials,

0:01:23.232 --> 0:01:26.672
<v Speaker 1>a claim that fueled the case's viral spread and polarized

0:01:26.672 --> 0:01:29.631
<v Speaker 1>a Massachusetts town. Take a listen to the episode let

0:01:29.672 --> 0:01:32.712
<v Speaker 1>us know what you think.

0:01:36.232 --> 0:01:40.271
<v Speaker 2>It's a blustery winter's night in Canton, Massachusetts, in January

0:01:40.271 --> 0:01:43.352
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty two, and Karen Reid and John O'Keeffe are

0:01:43.352 --> 0:01:47.392
<v Speaker 2>out with friends. They're drinking, bar hopping and enjoying a

0:01:47.472 --> 0:01:50.432
<v Speaker 2>night on the town. John is a local cop and

0:01:50.472 --> 0:01:51.992
<v Speaker 2>the plan is to move the party to one of

0:01:52.072 --> 0:01:56.392
<v Speaker 2>his colleagues homes nearby. After midnight, Karen drops John at

0:01:56.432 --> 0:01:59.552
<v Speaker 2>the address and heads back to his house. She starts

0:01:59.592 --> 0:02:02.512
<v Speaker 2>panicking when he still isn't home in the early hours

0:02:02.512 --> 0:02:07.232
<v Speaker 2>of the morning. Well that's her side of story, anyway.

0:02:08.432 --> 0:02:11.352
<v Speaker 2>John's body is found outside the location of the house

0:02:11.392 --> 0:02:15.032
<v Speaker 2>party at six am the next morning. Pieces from a

0:02:15.072 --> 0:02:19.432
<v Speaker 2>broken tail light are found nearby. As Karen wails at

0:02:19.472 --> 0:02:22.112
<v Speaker 2>the sight of her dead boyfriend, she says something that

0:02:22.192 --> 0:02:25.432
<v Speaker 2>remains a point of contention either I hit him, I

0:02:25.552 --> 0:02:29.912
<v Speaker 2>hit him? Or did I hit him? Did I hit him?

0:02:30.192 --> 0:02:33.832
<v Speaker 2>The slight change of inference means everything. It could mean

0:02:33.832 --> 0:02:37.232
<v Speaker 2>the difference between freedom and a jail cell for Karen.

0:02:38.592 --> 0:02:42.192
<v Speaker 2>But this story gets even murkier because as her defense

0:02:42.232 --> 0:02:45.752
<v Speaker 2>picks up the case, they start to unravel another potential

0:02:45.832 --> 0:02:50.192
<v Speaker 2>series of events, one that involves a cover up, contamination

0:02:50.312 --> 0:02:54.312
<v Speaker 2>by law enforcement, and the framing of Karen for murder.

0:03:05.672 --> 0:03:09.312
<v Speaker 2>I'm Jemma and this is True Crime Conversations a Muma

0:03:09.392 --> 0:03:13.512
<v Speaker 2>mea podcast exploring the world's most notorious crimes by speaking

0:03:13.592 --> 0:03:16.672
<v Speaker 2>to the people who know the most about them. Before

0:03:16.712 --> 0:03:19.832
<v Speaker 2>her arrest, Karen Reid was a financial analyst and professor.

0:03:20.472 --> 0:03:23.272
<v Speaker 2>She'd been dating John O'Keefe, a Boston police officer, for

0:03:23.352 --> 0:03:27.272
<v Speaker 2>two years. Photos of the pair show an attractive, smiling

0:03:27.312 --> 0:03:30.712
<v Speaker 2>couple in their mid forties, but despite the pretty pictures,

0:03:30.752 --> 0:03:35.312
<v Speaker 2>their relationship wasn't all rosy. They'd been having some disagreements

0:03:35.312 --> 0:03:38.112
<v Speaker 2>in the lead up to that January twenty twenty two evening.

0:03:39.072 --> 0:03:42.312
<v Speaker 2>Ever since John's death, the town where he died has

0:03:42.352 --> 0:03:46.712
<v Speaker 2>been divided, but it since snowbled into an international debate

0:03:47.152 --> 0:03:50.192
<v Speaker 2>fueled by the Free Karen movement that's grown legs online.

0:03:50.912 --> 0:03:54.832
<v Speaker 2>There's two very distinct camps. Was John killed by those

0:03:54.952 --> 0:03:58.272
<v Speaker 2>inside the house, a house full of police and law

0:03:58.352 --> 0:04:02.272
<v Speaker 2>enforcement who then proceeded to cover up his murder, or

0:04:02.312 --> 0:04:05.752
<v Speaker 2>did his girlfriend Karen kill him before he even made

0:04:05.752 --> 0:04:09.672
<v Speaker 2>it through the To help us unpack those theories and

0:04:09.792 --> 0:04:13.072
<v Speaker 2>everything that came before it, we're joined by Jessica lalfa,

0:04:13.392 --> 0:04:16.992
<v Speaker 2>producer of Karen, an in depth podcast series by the

0:04:17.072 --> 0:04:29.472
<v Speaker 2>Law and Crime Network. Jessica joins us now. Jess tell

0:04:29.512 --> 0:04:32.351
<v Speaker 2>us about Karen and Jones love story.

0:04:33.272 --> 0:04:36.512
<v Speaker 3>So, Karen and John actually first met when they were

0:04:36.512 --> 0:04:40.992
<v Speaker 3>in their twenties, shortly after college. They dated for a

0:04:41.032 --> 0:04:44.032
<v Speaker 3>little while, but their careers took them on different paths.

0:04:44.552 --> 0:04:49.991
<v Speaker 3>Karen became an adjunct professor at Bentley University in Massachusetts,

0:04:50.552 --> 0:04:54.272
<v Speaker 3>and John O'Keeffe became a cop. He was a Boston

0:04:54.312 --> 0:04:58.352
<v Speaker 3>Police officer, and in twenty twenty or you know, during

0:04:58.392 --> 0:05:02.312
<v Speaker 3>the COVID era, they came across each other again on

0:05:02.352 --> 0:05:05.592
<v Speaker 3>Facebook and he messaged her and was like, you know,

0:05:05.712 --> 0:05:10.072
<v Speaker 3>longtime no see and she was looking at his profile

0:05:10.152 --> 0:05:12.872
<v Speaker 3>and was like, oh, I noticed you have these kids

0:05:12.912 --> 0:05:15.072
<v Speaker 3>with you now, like, what's going on with that? And

0:05:15.272 --> 0:05:18.672
<v Speaker 3>it turns out that he has taken custody of his

0:05:18.792 --> 0:05:23.032
<v Speaker 3>niece and his nephew after the really really sad story

0:05:23.112 --> 0:05:26.352
<v Speaker 3>that not only did his brother in law die, but

0:05:26.512 --> 0:05:30.192
<v Speaker 3>also his sister died, and so that left the kids

0:05:30.232 --> 0:05:33.232
<v Speaker 3>without any parents, and so John swooped in and took

0:05:33.272 --> 0:05:36.592
<v Speaker 3>them under his wing. And so he ended up taking

0:05:36.632 --> 0:05:39.992
<v Speaker 3>a desk job at the Boston Police Department to have

0:05:40.072 --> 0:05:43.752
<v Speaker 3>a safer job so he could take care of these kids.

0:05:43.912 --> 0:05:47.152
<v Speaker 3>And from what I'd seen on their TikTok, they just

0:05:47.232 --> 0:05:49.032
<v Speaker 3>had like a ton of fun together. You can tell

0:05:49.072 --> 0:05:52.952
<v Speaker 3>he was the fun uncle and really loved them, and

0:05:53.112 --> 0:05:55.192
<v Speaker 3>it really just seemed like a really fun house to

0:05:55.232 --> 0:05:59.632
<v Speaker 3>live in. But Karen and John they rekindled and they

0:05:59.872 --> 0:06:02.792
<v Speaker 3>dated for two years up until the night that this

0:06:03.592 --> 0:06:05.032
<v Speaker 3>tragic incident happened.

0:06:05.792 --> 0:06:09.392
<v Speaker 2>That's a little of different dynamics to navigate as someone

0:06:09.472 --> 0:06:13.952
<v Speaker 2>coming into a new relationship. You've got this once single guy,

0:06:14.352 --> 0:06:17.232
<v Speaker 2>no kids, who suddenly has two children to look after,

0:06:17.272 --> 0:06:20.712
<v Speaker 2>he's also grieving. How did they navigate all of that?

0:06:21.032 --> 0:06:24.272
<v Speaker 2>Her basically adopting two step kids in this relationship.

0:06:25.072 --> 0:06:28.671
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, From all accounts we've heard, Karen really really cared

0:06:28.792 --> 0:06:33.232
<v Speaker 3>about the children, and she was often spending the night

0:06:33.352 --> 0:06:36.112
<v Speaker 3>at John's house and helping to raise them, to take

0:06:36.112 --> 0:06:38.112
<v Speaker 3>care of them. She was very invested in their futures.

0:06:38.112 --> 0:06:41.072
<v Speaker 3>But Karen and John were only dating, and so there

0:06:41.112 --> 0:06:43.592
<v Speaker 3>were times where she felt like she was being taken

0:06:43.712 --> 0:06:47.672
<v Speaker 3>advantage of when he would go out drinking and she

0:06:47.712 --> 0:06:49.432
<v Speaker 3>couldn't get a hold of him and she would be

0:06:49.512 --> 0:06:51.112
<v Speaker 3>at the house with the kids. You know, She's like,

0:06:51.152 --> 0:06:52.752
<v Speaker 3>I have to go back to my house. I have

0:06:52.792 --> 0:06:55.512
<v Speaker 3>a job to do, and you're nowhere to be found.

0:06:55.752 --> 0:06:59.032
<v Speaker 3>And so there was a lot of back and forth,

0:06:59.152 --> 0:07:01.632
<v Speaker 3>it seems, between the two of them over the kids,

0:07:01.672 --> 0:07:04.872
<v Speaker 3>and especially from some testimony we heard during the trial

0:07:05.272 --> 0:07:08.352
<v Speaker 3>about what she was feed eating the kids. It's actually

0:07:08.432 --> 0:07:12.032
<v Speaker 3>kind of ironic that it's all over like Dunkin Donuts,

0:07:12.072 --> 0:07:15.472
<v Speaker 3>which is very Massachusetts, very Boston of this case.

0:07:16.712 --> 0:07:19.632
<v Speaker 2>So take me through that he was upset that she

0:07:19.712 --> 0:07:20.752
<v Speaker 2>was feeding them donuts.

0:07:21.752 --> 0:07:25.032
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so there was just one morning where instead of

0:07:25.192 --> 0:07:27.592
<v Speaker 3>making them a breakfast, she brought them Dunkin Donuts and

0:07:27.672 --> 0:07:30.832
<v Speaker 3>John was unhappy about the kids eating donuts and wanting

0:07:30.832 --> 0:07:32.952
<v Speaker 3>them to eat something healthier and they had a big

0:07:33.032 --> 0:07:36.112
<v Speaker 3>argument about it. But I'll say this, just judging from

0:07:36.232 --> 0:07:40.552
<v Speaker 3>everything we've learned about Karen and John over the course

0:07:40.952 --> 0:07:42.712
<v Speaker 3>of the past couple of years since in since and

0:07:42.752 --> 0:07:45.992
<v Speaker 3>it happened, it seems like it's pretty easy to get

0:07:45.992 --> 0:07:48.112
<v Speaker 3>them to fly off the handle. You know, she seems

0:07:48.152 --> 0:07:50.792
<v Speaker 3>like she has quite a temper on her and I'm

0:07:50.792 --> 0:07:53.392
<v Speaker 3>not sure about John. I haven't heard that about him.

0:07:53.472 --> 0:07:57.472
<v Speaker 3>But it takes two to start a but yeah.

0:07:57.912 --> 0:08:01.072
<v Speaker 2>Quick to fire, by the sounds. So what was the

0:08:01.112 --> 0:08:04.232
<v Speaker 2>state of their relationship looking like in twenty twenty two?

0:08:04.632 --> 0:08:05.712
<v Speaker 2>Early twenty twenty.

0:08:05.512 --> 0:08:09.872
<v Speaker 3>Two, people in the group were saying that the relationship

0:08:09.872 --> 0:08:13.952
<v Speaker 3>had run its course. The niece actually had overheard John

0:08:14.672 --> 0:08:17.752
<v Speaker 3>say to Karen that this isn't healthy. And this was

0:08:17.792 --> 0:08:21.512
<v Speaker 3>one week before his death, And so there's a lot

0:08:21.552 --> 0:08:26.112
<v Speaker 3>of moving parts around this time. They're dating, she's practically

0:08:26.152 --> 0:08:29.032
<v Speaker 3>living with him, she's taking care of his children, but

0:08:29.312 --> 0:08:30.992
<v Speaker 3>you know, they still love each other, and so it

0:08:31.072 --> 0:08:33.392
<v Speaker 3>seems like it's very hard for them to figure out

0:08:33.432 --> 0:08:36.992
<v Speaker 3>like how to make this work. And then leading up

0:08:36.992 --> 0:08:39.232
<v Speaker 3>to the night of the twenty eighth, you can see

0:08:39.272 --> 0:08:43.112
<v Speaker 3>on surveillance footage, John and Karen and their group of friends.

0:08:43.152 --> 0:08:46.912
<v Speaker 3>They're at this bar called the Waterfall Bard Girl, and

0:08:47.032 --> 0:08:49.592
<v Speaker 3>they look like they're having a great time. Everybody looks

0:08:49.592 --> 0:08:52.672
<v Speaker 3>like they're getting along. Everybody's laughing. She's like holding on

0:08:52.712 --> 0:08:56.552
<v Speaker 3>to him. They're very affectionate, and it's very hard to

0:08:56.592 --> 0:08:58.312
<v Speaker 3>believe everything that happens. After this.

0:08:59.472 --> 0:09:01.672
<v Speaker 2>They go to an after patty, which is what happens

0:09:01.672 --> 0:09:04.752
<v Speaker 2>after the night out drinking. Before we get to what happened,

0:09:04.832 --> 0:09:07.992
<v Speaker 2>can you give us some context about who was at

0:09:07.992 --> 0:09:10.792
<v Speaker 2>that afterpotty because it was a house that was owned

0:09:11.272 --> 0:09:13.872
<v Speaker 2>by a man called Brian Albert, and he's quite significant

0:09:13.912 --> 0:09:14.472
<v Speaker 2>in this story.

0:09:15.112 --> 0:09:18.632
<v Speaker 3>He is so Brian Albert is also a Boston police officer,

0:09:18.792 --> 0:09:22.312
<v Speaker 3>so he knew John O'Keefe. He said he was a

0:09:22.312 --> 0:09:25.152
<v Speaker 3>friend of his, but they were probably just buddies. They're

0:09:25.152 --> 0:09:28.512
<v Speaker 3>also cops. They live near each other. And also John

0:09:28.552 --> 0:09:32.151
<v Speaker 3>O'Keeffe lives next door to Colin Albert, which is the

0:09:32.152 --> 0:09:36.112
<v Speaker 3>nephew of Brian Albert. So thirty four Fairview Road is

0:09:36.152 --> 0:09:39.752
<v Speaker 3>where all of this ends up taking place in Campton, Massachusetts.

0:09:40.352 --> 0:09:43.912
<v Speaker 3>A Norraters coming in, which is a huge snowstorm, the

0:09:44.072 --> 0:09:46.312
<v Speaker 3>likes of which the area had not seen in years,

0:09:46.512 --> 0:09:49.832
<v Speaker 3>and they were projected to get like feet and feet

0:09:49.952 --> 0:09:52.632
<v Speaker 3>of snow, and so they were all just trying to

0:09:52.672 --> 0:09:55.192
<v Speaker 3>get one last hurrah before they were going to be

0:09:55.352 --> 0:10:00.392
<v Speaker 3>holed in by this snow. And at the house, they're

0:10:00.472 --> 0:10:05.552
<v Speaker 3>celebrating Brian Junior's birthday party. So Brian Junior is there

0:10:05.832 --> 0:10:08.912
<v Speaker 3>at the house with a bunch of his friends, while

0:10:08.992 --> 0:10:11.912
<v Speaker 3>the parents in John O'Keeffe and Karen Reider at the bar.

0:10:12.312 --> 0:10:16.272
<v Speaker 3>And so around twelve fifteen, everyone starts trickling from the

0:10:16.312 --> 0:10:19.112
<v Speaker 3>bar to the Albert home and this is the home

0:10:19.192 --> 0:10:23.752
<v Speaker 3>of Brian Albert. And at the home with them at

0:10:23.752 --> 0:10:28.511
<v Speaker 3>this point is Jennifer McCabe. So one other person that's

0:10:28.512 --> 0:10:30.792
<v Speaker 3>at this party is the person that Karen Reid has

0:10:30.792 --> 0:10:34.832
<v Speaker 3>been exchanging flirtatious text with and he was also at

0:10:34.832 --> 0:10:37.952
<v Speaker 3>the bar. His name is Brian Higgins. There are two

0:10:38.032 --> 0:10:43.352
<v Speaker 3>Brian's in this story. So Brian Higgins is not a

0:10:43.392 --> 0:10:46.752
<v Speaker 3>police officer, but he's in law enforcement and he happens

0:10:46.752 --> 0:10:49.112
<v Speaker 3>to have an office in the Canton Police Department, where

0:10:50.192 --> 0:10:54.912
<v Speaker 3>Kevin Albert is a detective. Kevin is Brian's brother, and

0:10:54.952 --> 0:11:00.112
<v Speaker 3>they have another brother named Chris, who is the Canton Selectman.

0:11:01.112 --> 0:11:04.192
<v Speaker 3>So this is clearly a very well connected family in

0:11:04.192 --> 0:11:09.312
<v Speaker 3>this little town. So it's easy to see where this

0:11:09.392 --> 0:11:15.232
<v Speaker 3>conspiracy theory took fire because there are so many tentacles

0:11:15.272 --> 0:11:18.832
<v Speaker 3>to this family and so many people involved. But at

0:11:18.832 --> 0:11:22.312
<v Speaker 3>the core of it, that night, there were about ten

0:11:23.072 --> 0:11:26.632
<v Speaker 3>adults and maybe a few of the kids left from

0:11:26.672 --> 0:11:29.872
<v Speaker 3>the birthday celebration around twelve thirty at night.

0:11:30.872 --> 0:11:34.312
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so what does Karen say happened that evening?

0:11:35.352 --> 0:11:39.192
<v Speaker 3>So Karen Reid has really not said much about this

0:11:39.352 --> 0:11:45.032
<v Speaker 3>case publicly, except she did an interview for Nightline back

0:11:45.072 --> 0:11:48.912
<v Speaker 3>in twenty twenty three before the trial took place, and

0:11:48.992 --> 0:11:52.312
<v Speaker 3>I'm actually surprised her lawyers let her do this. But

0:11:52.672 --> 0:11:56.712
<v Speaker 3>she says that she and John were leaving the bar

0:11:57.632 --> 0:12:00.272
<v Speaker 3>and he says, we're going to go to the Alberts

0:12:00.272 --> 0:12:03.992
<v Speaker 3>for the after party. She says, are we invited? I

0:12:04.032 --> 0:12:07.472
<v Speaker 3>want to make sure we're invited, And so she tells

0:12:07.552 --> 0:12:10.792
<v Speaker 3>him when they get there to go inside to make

0:12:10.832 --> 0:12:15.672
<v Speaker 3>sure that it's okay, that they're welcome there. And this

0:12:15.752 --> 0:12:17.872
<v Speaker 3>is where the details get like a little fuzzy, because

0:12:17.912 --> 0:12:20.272
<v Speaker 3>she says she never saw him go in the house,

0:12:20.632 --> 0:12:23.232
<v Speaker 3>but she saw him approach the door, she says she

0:12:23.312 --> 0:12:27.072
<v Speaker 3>looked down at her phone and then drove off, which

0:12:27.112 --> 0:12:29.272
<v Speaker 3>is kind of weird because I thought she was going

0:12:29.352 --> 0:12:32.152
<v Speaker 3>to stay at the party. But there's also some times

0:12:32.152 --> 0:12:34.392
<v Speaker 3>where she said that she waited for a really long

0:12:34.472 --> 0:12:38.512
<v Speaker 3>time for John to come out and give her the confirmation,

0:12:38.752 --> 0:12:41.072
<v Speaker 3>and he wasn't answering his phone and he wasn't responding

0:12:41.072 --> 0:12:44.232
<v Speaker 3>to any texts. So perhaps she was there for about

0:12:44.232 --> 0:12:48.232
<v Speaker 3>ten minutes and waited for him, and then she took

0:12:48.312 --> 0:12:50.912
<v Speaker 3>off and went back to his house for the night

0:12:51.072 --> 0:12:54.152
<v Speaker 3>because that's where the kids were and somebody needed to

0:12:54.152 --> 0:12:57.512
<v Speaker 3>be with them overnight. And over the course of this

0:12:57.592 --> 0:13:02.992
<v Speaker 3>whole evening, she's blowing up his phone, she's texting him,

0:13:03.032 --> 0:13:07.472
<v Speaker 3>she calls him fifty times, and she's leaving like these

0:13:07.472 --> 0:13:12.312
<v Speaker 3>profanity laden voicemails. They're kind of funny if it wasn't

0:13:12.352 --> 0:13:16.072
<v Speaker 3>in the middle of this extremely serious situation. So that's

0:13:16.192 --> 0:13:19.432
<v Speaker 3>Karen's story, is that she wakes up around five am

0:13:19.472 --> 0:13:22.112
<v Speaker 3>and she realizes John never came into the house. She

0:13:22.192 --> 0:13:24.872
<v Speaker 3>was sleeping on the couch and I believe the niece

0:13:24.952 --> 0:13:28.232
<v Speaker 3>was with her in the living room, So she calls

0:13:28.352 --> 0:13:32.192
<v Speaker 3>Jennifer McCabe, who again is the sister in law of

0:13:32.232 --> 0:13:35.192
<v Speaker 3>Brian Albert, the homeowner, and she says, you know, John

0:13:35.192 --> 0:13:37.312
<v Speaker 3>never came home last night. Where's John? Do you think

0:13:37.352 --> 0:13:40.672
<v Speaker 3>he got hit by a plow? And it's really interesting

0:13:40.992 --> 0:13:45.472
<v Speaker 3>that she's just throwing out all of these weird like

0:13:45.552 --> 0:13:47.512
<v Speaker 3>what if he got hit by a plow? Like we

0:13:47.512 --> 0:13:50.872
<v Speaker 3>need to go look for him. So she and Jennifer

0:13:50.952 --> 0:13:54.272
<v Speaker 3>and this woman Carrie Roberts decide to go on this

0:13:54.792 --> 0:13:59.792
<v Speaker 3>journey together to look for John. And while she's on

0:13:59.832 --> 0:14:04.392
<v Speaker 3>the phone with Jennifer McCabe, Jennifer's husband hears the conversation

0:14:04.952 --> 0:14:07.712
<v Speaker 3>and Karen is saying, I left him at the waterfall.

0:14:07.832 --> 0:14:09.992
<v Speaker 3>I must have left him at the waterfall, and he's like,

0:14:10.072 --> 0:14:13.752
<v Speaker 3>what are you talking about? We saw you outside the house.

0:14:14.112 --> 0:14:16.392
<v Speaker 3>So there are multiple people who say they saw her

0:14:16.512 --> 0:14:20.072
<v Speaker 3>dark suv outside of the house. So we know that

0:14:20.192 --> 0:14:23.872
<v Speaker 3>it's at least true that she pulled up to the

0:14:23.912 --> 0:14:27.952
<v Speaker 3>house and dropped off John. That's true. Nobody's debating that.

0:14:28.872 --> 0:14:32.112
<v Speaker 3>But what happens next is still a mystery because they're

0:14:32.192 --> 0:14:36.352
<v Speaker 3>driving around the two square miles from the bar to

0:14:36.472 --> 0:14:40.032
<v Speaker 3>the two houses, and as soon as they pull up

0:14:40.072 --> 0:14:43.872
<v Speaker 3>in front of the house. The homeowner is Brian Albert,

0:14:44.152 --> 0:14:49.232
<v Speaker 3>Boston police officer. She immediately homes in on this gigantic

0:14:49.392 --> 0:14:52.712
<v Speaker 3>snow mound in between the flagpole and the fire hydrant,

0:14:52.992 --> 0:14:55.192
<v Speaker 3>and she runs and she bee lines to it. She's like,

0:14:55.232 --> 0:14:58.432
<v Speaker 3>it's John, it's John, it's John. Nobody else sees what

0:14:58.592 --> 0:15:02.272
<v Speaker 3>she's seeing. Like again, it's snowing, very, very hard. There's

0:15:02.272 --> 0:15:03.872
<v Speaker 3>at least two feet of snow on the ground, I

0:15:03.912 --> 0:15:07.032
<v Speaker 3>believe at this point, and she runs over to him.

0:15:07.112 --> 0:15:09.752
<v Speaker 3>She's pushing the snow off of him. At one point

0:15:09.832 --> 0:15:13.512
<v Speaker 3>she takes her shirt off, she takes his shirt off,

0:15:13.552 --> 0:15:19.192
<v Speaker 3>and she's trying to warm him up. And I believe

0:15:19.832 --> 0:15:23.872
<v Speaker 3>he's still alive at this point, or you know, maybe

0:15:23.952 --> 0:15:28.752
<v Speaker 3>he's just pronounced dead later. But it's really strange what

0:15:28.792 --> 0:15:31.752
<v Speaker 3>you end up seeing. Of course, I've never seen his

0:15:31.872 --> 0:15:34.832
<v Speaker 3>body on the scene, but he has two black eyes,

0:15:35.632 --> 0:15:38.712
<v Speaker 3>a big straight abrasion on the back of his head,

0:15:39.312 --> 0:15:41.552
<v Speaker 3>and he has a lot of what looked like claw

0:15:41.592 --> 0:15:46.552
<v Speaker 3>marks scratches on one of his arms, and he's bleeding

0:15:46.592 --> 0:15:49.312
<v Speaker 3>from the mouth and the nose and the eyes, and

0:15:49.392 --> 0:15:51.992
<v Speaker 3>so they call nine one one. Multiple people have called

0:15:52.072 --> 0:15:54.792
<v Speaker 3>nine one one at this point, and this is where

0:15:54.872 --> 0:15:58.632
<v Speaker 3>again it gets even more complicated because a lot of

0:15:58.672 --> 0:16:02.992
<v Speaker 3>people end up on this scene, the paramedics, the investigating

0:16:03.072 --> 0:16:07.232
<v Speaker 3>officers from the Canton Police Department, who do not investigate homicides,

0:16:07.312 --> 0:16:10.232
<v Speaker 3>let alone deaths, and so they're a little bit out

0:16:10.232 --> 0:16:13.872
<v Speaker 3>of their element. It's snowing, it's a crazy scene. It's

0:16:13.872 --> 0:16:18.832
<v Speaker 3>six in the morning, and Karen is screaming hysterically. Everyone

0:16:18.912 --> 0:16:21.712
<v Speaker 3>keeps talking about how crazy she's going at this scene,

0:16:21.712 --> 0:16:25.272
<v Speaker 3>while everyone else is very calm and they're just, you know,

0:16:25.392 --> 0:16:27.992
<v Speaker 3>kind of in shock that this is even happening to

0:16:28.272 --> 0:16:34.072
<v Speaker 3>their good friend John O'Keefe. And there are multiple accounts

0:16:34.752 --> 0:16:38.712
<v Speaker 3>that Karen said I hit him, I hit him, I

0:16:38.792 --> 0:16:43.512
<v Speaker 3>hit him, but nobody wrote it down in a single

0:16:43.552 --> 0:16:45.032
<v Speaker 3>report at the time.

0:16:46.152 --> 0:16:49.712
<v Speaker 2>There was also contention over the wording of that wasn't.

0:16:49.512 --> 0:16:54.152
<v Speaker 3>There right, And so she maintains that she did not

0:16:54.232 --> 0:16:57.632
<v Speaker 3>say I hit him. She maintains she asked did I

0:16:57.752 --> 0:17:01.992
<v Speaker 3>hit him? Could I have hit him? Because she's thinking

0:17:02.072 --> 0:17:05.032
<v Speaker 3>back to the night before when she dropped him off.

0:17:05.672 --> 0:17:07.712
<v Speaker 3>And so this is where it gets a little fuzzy,

0:17:07.752 --> 0:17:11.432
<v Speaker 3>because you either have to believe that she doesn't remember

0:17:11.512 --> 0:17:14.711
<v Speaker 3>anything about that night, or she's only remembering details, or

0:17:14.752 --> 0:17:18.751
<v Speaker 3>they're coming to her over time, which could happen. But

0:17:19.952 --> 0:17:23.071
<v Speaker 3>really everything about this case is really complicated by the

0:17:23.111 --> 0:17:28.032
<v Speaker 3>fact that nobody secures the scene. None of the officers

0:17:28.631 --> 0:17:33.832
<v Speaker 3>separate the witnesses. They never go into the home. Brian Albert,

0:17:34.111 --> 0:17:38.032
<v Speaker 3>a police officer and a first responder, never comes out

0:17:38.071 --> 0:17:42.631
<v Speaker 3>of his home to see what's going on outside. And

0:17:43.752 --> 0:17:49.392
<v Speaker 3>they start collecting evidence with red solo cups borrowed from

0:17:49.671 --> 0:17:52.471
<v Speaker 3>a cop neighbor who lives down the street.

0:17:53.111 --> 0:17:55.152
<v Speaker 2>That is a wild detile, isn't it.

0:17:55.712 --> 0:17:57.511
<v Speaker 3>I know it came out in the trial. It was

0:17:57.591 --> 0:17:59.431
<v Speaker 3>just like, how far away is the police department? You

0:17:59.512 --> 0:18:02.711
<v Speaker 3>guys don't have sterile plastic containers? What would take you

0:18:02.712 --> 0:18:06.032
<v Speaker 3>five minutes to get there? So they're clearly out of

0:18:06.032 --> 0:18:09.232
<v Speaker 3>their element. By the time the afternoon rolls around. Obviously

0:18:09.272 --> 0:18:11.032
<v Speaker 3>this case has been taken out of their hands and

0:18:11.071 --> 0:18:15.272
<v Speaker 3>it's given to the Massachusetts State Police. And this complicates

0:18:15.272 --> 0:18:19.792
<v Speaker 3>the case even more because the person assigned to investigate

0:18:19.831 --> 0:18:23.191
<v Speaker 3>this is Trooper Michael Proctor, and he is also a

0:18:23.232 --> 0:18:25.351
<v Speaker 3>friend of the homeowner. Brian Albert.

0:18:29.992 --> 0:18:33.631
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to true crime conversations with me Jim A.

0:18:33.671 --> 0:18:33.951
<v Speaker 1>Bath.

0:18:34.472 --> 0:18:43.392
<v Speaker 2>I'm speaking with Jessica Lautha about the trial of Karen Reid.

0:18:44.752 --> 0:18:49.631
<v Speaker 2>What is John's actual cause of death put down in

0:18:49.992 --> 0:18:51.552
<v Speaker 2>his autopsy report.

0:18:52.232 --> 0:18:56.431
<v Speaker 3>This is what's crazy, is that his cause of death

0:18:56.591 --> 0:19:01.231
<v Speaker 3>is blunt force trauma mixed with hypothermia. So if it

0:19:01.272 --> 0:19:04.991
<v Speaker 3>happened how the prosecution says it happened, is that Karen

0:19:05.032 --> 0:19:09.151
<v Speaker 3>Reid back up into John O'Keefe hit him with her

0:19:09.232 --> 0:19:12.831
<v Speaker 3>car and he laid there for six hours until someone

0:19:12.952 --> 0:19:18.111
<v Speaker 3>found him, and it was freezing cold, wind whipping snow

0:19:18.192 --> 0:19:22.271
<v Speaker 3>piling up. But what's so strange about that is that

0:19:22.311 --> 0:19:24.912
<v Speaker 3>there were a lot of people coming and going from

0:19:24.992 --> 0:19:30.831
<v Speaker 3>this party all night, and even the plow driver who

0:19:30.871 --> 0:19:33.471
<v Speaker 3>came through at two thirty in the morning has his

0:19:33.591 --> 0:19:36.071
<v Speaker 3>light shining and says he never sees anything in that

0:19:36.151 --> 0:19:38.431
<v Speaker 3>front lawn, and he would have noticed it because he

0:19:38.552 --> 0:19:44.231
<v Speaker 3>drives this route all the time. And they never determined

0:19:44.472 --> 0:19:49.232
<v Speaker 3>his manner of death, which is curious that you would

0:19:49.351 --> 0:19:51.791
<v Speaker 3>try to put someone on trial for murder without a

0:19:51.831 --> 0:19:53.512
<v Speaker 3>determined manner of death.

0:19:54.272 --> 0:19:57.952
<v Speaker 2>And there were, as you were saying before, quite bizarre

0:19:57.992 --> 0:20:01.911
<v Speaker 2>injuries on him. If you consider that, the prosecution thinks

0:20:01.952 --> 0:20:04.792
<v Speaker 2>that he was backed into. But he had bruises on

0:20:04.911 --> 0:20:09.032
<v Speaker 2>his eyes, and he had weird mocks on his arms.

0:20:10.111 --> 0:20:12.431
<v Speaker 3>And that's the thing, is that the prosecution has an

0:20:12.431 --> 0:20:15.831
<v Speaker 3>expert that testifies that these injuries are consistent with being

0:20:15.911 --> 0:20:19.112
<v Speaker 3>hit by a car, but the defense has an expert

0:20:19.151 --> 0:20:21.472
<v Speaker 3>that goes on and says they're not. This is consistent

0:20:21.512 --> 0:20:24.152
<v Speaker 3>with either a fight or an attack by an animal.

0:20:24.752 --> 0:20:26.512
<v Speaker 2>And there was an animal there wasn't there.

0:20:27.151 --> 0:20:29.992
<v Speaker 3>There was an animal there, and is if this story

0:20:30.032 --> 0:20:32.632
<v Speaker 3>is not crazy enough. Now a dog named Chloe becomes

0:20:32.671 --> 0:20:36.591
<v Speaker 3>a suspect. There's a German shepherd that's been living with

0:20:36.671 --> 0:20:42.071
<v Speaker 3>the Alberts for seven years, their beloved pet dog. And curiously,

0:20:43.111 --> 0:20:47.591
<v Speaker 3>they rehome this dog within months of John o'keeith's death.

0:20:48.071 --> 0:20:51.912
<v Speaker 3>And not only do they rehome the dog, they rehome themselves.

0:20:52.232 --> 0:20:55.231
<v Speaker 3>They buy a new home, even after they had just

0:20:55.311 --> 0:21:00.071
<v Speaker 3>renovated their entire basement. So a lot of curious things

0:21:00.192 --> 0:21:04.272
<v Speaker 3>going on, a lot of strange coincidences, I suppose. But

0:21:05.232 --> 0:21:09.111
<v Speaker 3>on the final day of the trial, before closing arguments,

0:21:09.911 --> 0:21:12.232
<v Speaker 3>they have an expert go up there and say, these

0:21:12.351 --> 0:21:15.751
<v Speaker 3>marks on John O'Keefe's arms are consistent with that of

0:21:15.871 --> 0:21:18.992
<v Speaker 3>dog claw marks and bites, and if you look at

0:21:19.032 --> 0:21:22.352
<v Speaker 3>the photos or look at other photos of dog attacks,

0:21:22.391 --> 0:21:27.552
<v Speaker 3>they look exactly the same. Nobody ever examined the dog.

0:21:27.631 --> 0:21:31.032
<v Speaker 3>The dog was living in Vermont, and they say that

0:21:31.111 --> 0:21:34.472
<v Speaker 3>they offered up the address of the dog if they

0:21:34.512 --> 0:21:38.752
<v Speaker 3>wanted to go interview her. But yeah, no one ever

0:21:38.831 --> 0:21:43.111
<v Speaker 3>really followed up with this lead. And because really the

0:21:43.192 --> 0:21:45.071
<v Speaker 3>crux of the story is is that they honed in

0:21:45.111 --> 0:21:50.751
<v Speaker 3>on Karen Reid from day one and they wanted someone

0:21:50.792 --> 0:21:54.032
<v Speaker 3>to blame this on, and they blamed it on her.

0:21:54.631 --> 0:21:58.951
<v Speaker 2>Well, she was arrested in early feb initially not charged

0:21:58.992 --> 0:22:03.712
<v Speaker 2>with murder, but quite quickly upgraded to murder two, which Frozzies,

0:22:03.792 --> 0:22:07.311
<v Speaker 2>is kind of like manslaughter. On what evidence was that

0:22:07.431 --> 0:22:10.791
<v Speaker 2>charge made? You've said that the prosecution claims that the

0:22:10.831 --> 0:22:14.831
<v Speaker 2>car backed into John, but what was the evidence that

0:22:14.831 --> 0:22:15.432
<v Speaker 2>that happened.

0:22:16.671 --> 0:22:21.232
<v Speaker 3>The evidence that they claim that proves Karen Reid hit

0:22:21.351 --> 0:22:25.232
<v Speaker 3>John O'Keefe with her SUV is that there were microscopic

0:22:25.552 --> 0:22:31.992
<v Speaker 3>tail light pieces found on him, and there were tail

0:22:32.071 --> 0:22:35.231
<v Speaker 3>light pieces that were found around the scene underneath the snow.

0:22:35.351 --> 0:22:38.552
<v Speaker 3>So after they use the leaf blower to push all

0:22:38.591 --> 0:22:41.471
<v Speaker 3>the snow away, the State Police finally come in with

0:22:41.552 --> 0:22:47.191
<v Speaker 3>shovels and find tail light pieces underneath the snow. And

0:22:47.232 --> 0:22:49.391
<v Speaker 3>so that's one of the contentious points of this case

0:22:49.431 --> 0:22:52.151
<v Speaker 3>is that nobody saw any tail light pieces until the

0:22:52.151 --> 0:22:56.671
<v Speaker 3>state police came in. And when you have an investigator

0:22:56.712 --> 0:22:59.232
<v Speaker 3>assigned to this case who has as much history as

0:22:59.512 --> 0:23:03.511
<v Speaker 3>Trooper Proctor does, this is when the conspiracy starts to

0:23:03.792 --> 0:23:05.992
<v Speaker 3>really really boil to the surface.

0:23:06.992 --> 0:23:10.111
<v Speaker 2>Was there anything that directly challenged that version of events?

0:23:10.111 --> 0:23:13.712
<v Speaker 2>I've said a lot of debate about that tilelight evidence.

0:23:14.752 --> 0:23:18.992
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, the tailight evidence is really kind of crazy because

0:23:19.111 --> 0:23:23.432
<v Speaker 3>even at the trial, the plastic bag that the tailight

0:23:23.472 --> 0:23:27.552
<v Speaker 3>pieces are in multiply over time, like the pieces multiply,

0:23:27.671 --> 0:23:30.231
<v Speaker 3>and so at one point there's only three, then there's five.

0:23:31.071 --> 0:23:34.552
<v Speaker 3>And even over the course of the investigation of this case,

0:23:35.151 --> 0:23:39.871
<v Speaker 3>they found tailight pieces near his body. Then they found

0:23:39.871 --> 0:23:43.952
<v Speaker 3>the microscopic pieces on him. But when you see pictures

0:23:44.032 --> 0:23:47.752
<v Speaker 3>of Karen's SUV, the taillight did not look as broken

0:23:47.911 --> 0:23:50.552
<v Speaker 3>when they brought the car in as it did when

0:23:50.831 --> 0:23:55.512
<v Speaker 3>it left there. And so there's this surveillance footage of

0:23:55.752 --> 0:23:59.871
<v Speaker 3>the quote Sally Port that the Massachusetts State Police brought

0:24:00.071 --> 0:24:03.032
<v Speaker 3>her suv to search it to give it a very

0:24:03.032 --> 0:24:07.392
<v Speaker 3>thorough look through. And one thing that the defense notices

0:24:07.512 --> 0:24:10.032
<v Speaker 3>right away is that this video appears to be inverted,

0:24:10.472 --> 0:24:14.511
<v Speaker 3>and so what looks to be the passenger side is

0:24:14.591 --> 0:24:17.471
<v Speaker 3>actually the driver side, and what looks to be the

0:24:17.552 --> 0:24:20.591
<v Speaker 3>driver side is actually the passenger side, and supposedly it's

0:24:20.631 --> 0:24:23.871
<v Speaker 3>the right rear tail light, so on the passenger side

0:24:23.871 --> 0:24:28.871
<v Speaker 3>that's broken, and on the video you see two people

0:24:28.952 --> 0:24:33.511
<v Speaker 3>walk by and appear to be fiddling with something. But

0:24:33.952 --> 0:24:37.752
<v Speaker 3>because this looks like it might be the driver's side,

0:24:38.151 --> 0:24:41.512
<v Speaker 3>nobody's really thinking anything of it until it's pointed out

0:24:41.552 --> 0:24:44.192
<v Speaker 3>in the trial that no, this video is inverted. They

0:24:44.232 --> 0:24:46.391
<v Speaker 3>see the number on the wall, the floor is backwards,

0:24:46.591 --> 0:24:52.111
<v Speaker 3>on the police cruiser is backwards, and so it's very, very,

0:24:52.232 --> 0:24:56.111
<v Speaker 3>very complicated. What they're implying through all of this is

0:24:56.151 --> 0:24:59.952
<v Speaker 3>that Trooper Procter planted evidence and purposely broke the tail

0:24:59.992 --> 0:25:02.391
<v Speaker 3>light and brought the tail light pieces back to the

0:25:02.431 --> 0:25:05.951
<v Speaker 3>scene to plant in the snow to frame kar and

0:25:05.992 --> 0:25:07.311
<v Speaker 3>read this murder.

0:25:07.552 --> 0:25:11.512
<v Speaker 2>Which is a huge thing to accuse local law enforcement

0:25:11.552 --> 0:25:11.871
<v Speaker 2>of doing.

0:25:11.952 --> 0:25:18.231
<v Speaker 3>Right m it's not unheard of. There's a history in

0:25:18.272 --> 0:25:21.471
<v Speaker 3>this area of not trusting law enforcement. A lot of

0:25:21.512 --> 0:25:24.231
<v Speaker 3>people don't trust authority, A lot of people don't trust

0:25:24.232 --> 0:25:29.071
<v Speaker 3>the police, And so you have like two sides forming

0:25:29.552 --> 0:25:34.032
<v Speaker 3>do you trust the police investigating this case or do

0:25:34.071 --> 0:25:37.032
<v Speaker 3>you believe that this woman is being railroaded in the

0:25:37.071 --> 0:25:40.831
<v Speaker 3>death of her cop boyfriend. But it's not unheard of

0:25:41.311 --> 0:25:47.392
<v Speaker 3>for this area to be suspicious of these investigators, and

0:25:48.431 --> 0:25:51.231
<v Speaker 3>turns out a lot of them were right based on

0:25:51.472 --> 0:25:52.951
<v Speaker 3>what happens after the trial.

0:25:53.992 --> 0:25:58.752
<v Speaker 2>But what reason would these cops have to frame her?

0:25:58.952 --> 0:26:02.192
<v Speaker 2>What do they say happened? The defense to John.

0:26:03.311 --> 0:26:07.351
<v Speaker 3>The defensive theory of what happened that night is that

0:26:08.111 --> 0:26:11.752
<v Speaker 3>Karen drops John O'Keeffe off at the Alberts. He goes

0:26:11.792 --> 0:26:18.111
<v Speaker 3>into the house and is immediately confronted by people in

0:26:18.151 --> 0:26:22.432
<v Speaker 3>the basement of the albert home. There's a weight room

0:26:22.512 --> 0:26:25.472
<v Speaker 3>down there, and they think that a fight broke out

0:26:25.512 --> 0:26:29.191
<v Speaker 3>pretty quickly. Someone may have hit John O'Keefe with a

0:26:29.232 --> 0:26:32.272
<v Speaker 3>dumbbell on the back of the head, maybe punched him

0:26:32.391 --> 0:26:36.552
<v Speaker 3>in the face, and then maybe perhaps he fought back

0:26:36.871 --> 0:26:40.671
<v Speaker 3>and the dog intervened and the dog attacked him. And

0:26:42.151 --> 0:26:48.272
<v Speaker 3>I don't think anyone intended for John O'Keefe to die.

0:26:48.472 --> 0:26:51.152
<v Speaker 3>Now this is all alleged. This is a house full

0:26:51.192 --> 0:26:54.871
<v Speaker 3>of law enforcement, so they have to spend the next

0:26:54.911 --> 0:26:57.591
<v Speaker 3>few hours trying to figure out what to do. And

0:26:59.431 --> 0:27:02.871
<v Speaker 3>their theory is that they bring the body out through

0:27:03.032 --> 0:27:07.111
<v Speaker 3>this back set of stars from the base to the

0:27:07.151 --> 0:27:10.191
<v Speaker 3>backyard and bring the body around to the front yard

0:27:10.351 --> 0:27:17.912
<v Speaker 3>and lay him there with his phone underneath him.

0:27:17.992 --> 0:27:21.272
<v Speaker 2>Up next, we delve deeper into the trial that captivated

0:27:21.272 --> 0:27:24.232
<v Speaker 2>the world and the text messages that put a lead

0:27:24.351 --> 0:27:34.392
<v Speaker 2>investigator on notice.

0:27:34.591 --> 0:27:38.911
<v Speaker 3>And he lies there until Karen finds him at six

0:27:38.952 --> 0:27:45.232
<v Speaker 3>in the morning. And so how does this turn into

0:27:45.431 --> 0:27:48.911
<v Speaker 3>a big cover up? Is that Trooper Proctor again is

0:27:49.032 --> 0:27:52.591
<v Speaker 3>friends with Brian Albert. There is a thin blue line

0:27:53.752 --> 0:27:59.272
<v Speaker 3>cops protect other cops, and cops don't get in trouble

0:27:59.311 --> 0:28:02.192
<v Speaker 3>for these types of things, and we don't investigate other

0:28:02.311 --> 0:28:07.431
<v Speaker 3>cops and especially not our friends. And so Truect obviously

0:28:07.512 --> 0:28:09.631
<v Speaker 3>knew when he was pulling up to this house that

0:28:09.671 --> 0:28:12.351
<v Speaker 3>this was the house of his friend Brian Albert. He

0:28:12.472 --> 0:28:15.151
<v Speaker 3>chose not to go in and interview, he chose not

0:28:15.232 --> 0:28:17.911
<v Speaker 3>to lock down the crime scene, he chose not to

0:28:17.952 --> 0:28:21.912
<v Speaker 3>separate the witnesses, and there were a lot of missteps,

0:28:21.952 --> 0:28:25.151
<v Speaker 3>and all of this is captured in his own text

0:28:25.151 --> 0:28:28.311
<v Speaker 3>messages that he embarrassingly has to read on the stand

0:28:29.151 --> 0:28:33.871
<v Speaker 3>in front of the world, where he admits that he's

0:28:33.911 --> 0:28:36.431
<v Speaker 3>gonna make this case cut and dried and pin it

0:28:36.512 --> 0:28:39.392
<v Speaker 3>on the girl, and the girl is Karen Reid, And

0:28:39.431 --> 0:28:42.832
<v Speaker 3>then there's a lot of horrible text messages where he's

0:28:43.352 --> 0:28:47.192
<v Speaker 3>talking about her body and how hot she is and

0:28:47.232 --> 0:28:50.832
<v Speaker 3>how he hates her accent, and he calls her the

0:28:50.911 --> 0:28:54.271
<v Speaker 3>C word, and you know, there's just a lot of

0:28:54.392 --> 0:28:58.752
<v Speaker 3>really disgusting things said by this man to his superiors.

0:28:59.632 --> 0:29:02.192
<v Speaker 3>So you can tell this is kind of a culture, right,

0:29:02.792 --> 0:29:07.232
<v Speaker 3>a culture in this department, in this lawn or smith community,

0:29:07.712 --> 0:29:10.992
<v Speaker 3>that they can do anything and get away with it,

0:29:11.472 --> 0:29:14.592
<v Speaker 3>and even so far as to say no nudes yet

0:29:14.632 --> 0:29:19.352
<v Speaker 3>because he was going through Karen's phone, Oh my gosh. Yeah,

0:29:20.352 --> 0:29:24.392
<v Speaker 3>So all of this combined it makes it look like

0:29:24.431 --> 0:29:26.911
<v Speaker 3>a cover up. It makes it look from the beginning that,

0:29:27.032 --> 0:29:30.352
<v Speaker 3>you know what, this was Brian's house. We can't have

0:29:30.392 --> 0:29:33.872
<v Speaker 3>this on Brian. Let's just pin it on the girl, like,

0:29:34.032 --> 0:29:36.512
<v Speaker 3>let's just put it on her. And this didn't even

0:29:36.552 --> 0:29:39.552
<v Speaker 3>have to be a murder case. This didn't even have

0:29:39.632 --> 0:29:41.471
<v Speaker 3>to go to trial. When you really think about it,

0:29:41.512 --> 0:29:43.991
<v Speaker 3>this could have just been an accident. I don't know

0:29:44.552 --> 0:29:47.312
<v Speaker 3>if the defensis theory is correct. I don't know if

0:29:47.312 --> 0:29:49.752
<v Speaker 3>this was planned from the beginning to pin it on Karen,

0:29:49.832 --> 0:29:53.312
<v Speaker 3>or whether it just happened naturally after she supposedly said

0:29:53.352 --> 0:29:56.672
<v Speaker 3>I hit him at the scene. It all starts to

0:29:56.712 --> 0:29:59.911
<v Speaker 3>build and build and build to make for a very

0:30:00.112 --> 0:30:05.872
<v Speaker 3>very interesting case with a trial that riveted thousands and

0:30:06.392 --> 0:30:09.471
<v Speaker 3>hook over TikTok for like an entire week while Trooper

0:30:09.512 --> 0:30:13.032
<v Speaker 3>Proctors reading these text messages on the stand, apparently to

0:30:13.112 --> 0:30:15.992
<v Speaker 3>the horrified jurors we spoke to. Our reporter said that

0:30:16.072 --> 0:30:20.272
<v Speaker 3>the jurors were just disgusted visibly by these text messages

0:30:20.392 --> 0:30:23.911
<v Speaker 3>and by Trooper Proctor. And one interesting thing to note

0:30:23.911 --> 0:30:27.231
<v Speaker 3>is that the jurors, who are a very important element

0:30:27.272 --> 0:30:30.432
<v Speaker 3>of this case, they were not allowed to be aware

0:30:30.952 --> 0:30:35.152
<v Speaker 3>that Trooper Proctor was under investigation at this time for

0:30:35.392 --> 0:30:38.991
<v Speaker 3>his behavior on this case. They're not allowed to know that,

0:30:39.032 --> 0:30:41.312
<v Speaker 3>and they're not supposed to be looking up information about

0:30:41.312 --> 0:30:43.952
<v Speaker 3>the case after they leave. They're not sequestered, so it's

0:30:43.992 --> 0:30:46.752
<v Speaker 3>not like they're staying in a hotel with no TV.

0:30:47.032 --> 0:30:50.431
<v Speaker 3>No phone, no news. They're just not supposed to be

0:30:50.671 --> 0:30:52.432
<v Speaker 3>talking about it and they're not supposed to be looking

0:30:52.472 --> 0:30:56.872
<v Speaker 3>up in information about it. So not having that information

0:30:57.192 --> 0:30:59.471
<v Speaker 3>is pretty interesting. But I think he kind of you

0:30:59.671 --> 0:31:03.992
<v Speaker 3>said it all himself on the stand before.

0:31:03.712 --> 0:31:05.992
<v Speaker 2>We get more into the trial. I think it's worth

0:31:06.472 --> 0:31:10.272
<v Speaker 2>tracking a bit to TikTok because, as you mentioned, this

0:31:10.392 --> 0:31:13.392
<v Speaker 2>case exploded. People might have heard of book talk. There's

0:31:13.431 --> 0:31:15.592
<v Speaker 2>also crime talk out there, and this was one of

0:31:15.671 --> 0:31:19.352
<v Speaker 2>those cases that just captivated the internet. And I need

0:31:19.352 --> 0:31:21.231
<v Speaker 2>to bring in Turtle Boy because he's one of the

0:31:21.272 --> 0:31:24.072
<v Speaker 2>main reasons for that. Who on earth is Turtle Boy

0:31:24.232 --> 0:31:26.711
<v Speaker 2>and why is he kind of the one that helped

0:31:26.712 --> 0:31:27.471
<v Speaker 2>fuel all of this?

0:31:28.352 --> 0:31:31.471
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, So Aidan Kearney is his real name, and he

0:31:31.792 --> 0:31:36.152
<v Speaker 3>goes by Turtle Boy. He's a local Massachusetts blogger. He's

0:31:36.392 --> 0:31:39.112
<v Speaker 3>had this blog for over ten years, and he's really

0:31:39.152 --> 0:31:42.152
<v Speaker 3>known for his bravado and his kind of like take

0:31:42.272 --> 0:31:46.711
<v Speaker 3>no shit attitude. He's credited with bringing the Reed trial

0:31:46.792 --> 0:31:50.872
<v Speaker 3>to the public's attention and mobilizing the quote Free Karen

0:31:50.952 --> 0:31:54.751
<v Speaker 3>Reid movement that ended up resulting in crowds and crowds

0:31:54.752 --> 0:31:58.032
<v Speaker 3>of people forming outside of the courthouse wearing these pink

0:31:58.072 --> 0:32:01.472
<v Speaker 3>shirts and solidarity with Karen with their signs, and it

0:32:01.512 --> 0:32:03.471
<v Speaker 3>really kind of took on the air of like a

0:32:03.512 --> 0:32:08.392
<v Speaker 3>celebrity trial for this tiny little town in Massachusetts. And

0:32:08.431 --> 0:32:13.632
<v Speaker 3>that's all because of Aiden Kearney and he through our podcast,

0:32:13.872 --> 0:32:18.632
<v Speaker 3>which is just you know, affectually called Karen, we found

0:32:18.832 --> 0:32:23.271
<v Speaker 3>that Aiden Kearney was actually pretty heavily involved with the

0:32:23.312 --> 0:32:26.752
<v Speaker 3>defense before this case went to trial. He fed them

0:32:26.872 --> 0:32:31.751
<v Speaker 3>a lot of information about the Alberts and the mccabs

0:32:31.952 --> 0:32:34.352
<v Speaker 3>and he found a lot of this through his own

0:32:34.392 --> 0:32:39.352
<v Speaker 3>investigative work. Now he has been charged with witness intimidation

0:32:39.712 --> 0:32:42.112
<v Speaker 3>and so you know, he's not a perfect person to

0:32:42.152 --> 0:32:45.191
<v Speaker 3>be aligned with as a defense attorney. But at the

0:32:45.232 --> 0:32:50.231
<v Speaker 3>same time, he really exposed the police cover up and

0:32:50.272 --> 0:32:53.832
<v Speaker 3>the corruption in this town and the conspiracy surrounding this

0:32:53.952 --> 0:32:54.832
<v Speaker 3>case in particular.

0:32:55.552 --> 0:32:58.152
<v Speaker 2>He was also quite involved with Karen Rott.

0:32:58.472 --> 0:33:02.792
<v Speaker 3>Mm hmm. So it turns out that Turtle Boy and

0:33:02.872 --> 0:33:05.592
<v Speaker 3>Karen were talking a lot. They talked a lot on

0:33:05.632 --> 0:33:09.032
<v Speaker 3>the phone. There was dozens and dozens of phone calls

0:33:09.032 --> 0:33:12.232
<v Speaker 3>between the two of them. She would feed him information,

0:33:12.392 --> 0:33:16.431
<v Speaker 3>he would feed her information, and yeah, they were pretty

0:33:16.512 --> 0:33:20.552
<v Speaker 3>chummy there at the beginning, and I don't necessarily think

0:33:20.592 --> 0:33:22.552
<v Speaker 3>this is a bad thing as long as you know

0:33:22.632 --> 0:33:25.352
<v Speaker 3>he has sources to back up like what he's saying.

0:33:26.072 --> 0:33:30.272
<v Speaker 3>But the defense was basically given a gift in aiding

0:33:30.352 --> 0:33:35.352
<v Speaker 3>Kearney to really bolster this conspiracy theory.

0:33:36.431 --> 0:33:38.232
<v Speaker 2>Let's get to the trial, because it was a very

0:33:38.272 --> 0:33:42.312
<v Speaker 2>long trial went for nine ten weeks, which is huge

0:33:42.671 --> 0:33:46.752
<v Speaker 2>for something like this. Was there anything that stood out

0:33:46.792 --> 0:33:49.312
<v Speaker 2>to you? Obviously we knew all of this web that

0:33:49.352 --> 0:33:53.472
<v Speaker 2>had been built beforehand, all of these players. How did

0:33:53.472 --> 0:33:54.272
<v Speaker 2>you find the trial?

0:33:55.632 --> 0:34:01.511
<v Speaker 3>The trial was super entertaining and long and maybe a

0:34:01.512 --> 0:34:07.431
<v Speaker 3>bit in the weeds more than people really want to experience.

0:34:07.512 --> 0:34:10.672
<v Speaker 3>You know, in your regular courtroom drama that you're watching,

0:34:10.712 --> 0:34:13.032
<v Speaker 3>you only get the fiery good stuff, which there was

0:34:13.112 --> 0:34:15.591
<v Speaker 3>a ton of that in this trial. There was a

0:34:15.592 --> 0:34:17.872
<v Speaker 3>lot of funny moments on the stand, a lot of

0:34:18.792 --> 0:34:22.952
<v Speaker 3>people who maybe could have used some better prep before

0:34:22.991 --> 0:34:26.352
<v Speaker 3>they went on the stand to testify. But in the end,

0:34:26.392 --> 0:34:31.832
<v Speaker 3>this was a very emotional, very heated, very caustic trial

0:34:32.392 --> 0:34:37.832
<v Speaker 3>with really great defenders of Karen Reid. Her defense attorneys

0:34:37.911 --> 0:34:43.272
<v Speaker 3>were top notch. They gave great performances in front of

0:34:43.272 --> 0:34:46.832
<v Speaker 3>this jury, and the prosecution in turn ended up looking

0:34:46.872 --> 0:34:49.911
<v Speaker 3>a little silly because they brought all of these witnesses

0:34:50.712 --> 0:34:56.312
<v Speaker 3>who basically have nothing to say. They all agree that

0:34:56.431 --> 0:34:59.751
<v Speaker 3>John O'Keeffe never entered the house. They quote the guy

0:34:59.832 --> 0:35:02.511
<v Speaker 3>never went in the house. And the thing about that

0:35:02.632 --> 0:35:05.471
<v Speaker 3>is is that they're all on text messages together like

0:35:05.511 --> 0:35:08.392
<v Speaker 3>a text chain, kind of looking like they're trying to

0:35:08.392 --> 0:35:12.031
<v Speaker 3>get their story straight. And so all these people are

0:35:12.031 --> 0:35:15.911
<v Speaker 3>on the stand being grilled about these text messages. And

0:35:16.272 --> 0:35:18.312
<v Speaker 3>that's the other thing. When you're a witness in a

0:35:18.352 --> 0:35:20.352
<v Speaker 3>case like this, you have to turn over your phones,

0:35:20.911 --> 0:35:25.551
<v Speaker 3>and everyone did except for Brian Albert and Brian Higgins,

0:35:25.632 --> 0:35:29.711
<v Speaker 3>because their phones were destroyed right before the police were

0:35:29.752 --> 0:35:33.432
<v Speaker 3>able to collect them, which ends up becoming a pretty

0:35:33.511 --> 0:35:36.832
<v Speaker 3>huge part of Brian Higgins's testimony so far. This is

0:35:36.832 --> 0:35:39.272
<v Speaker 3>the standout moment to me, besides the Trooper Proctor stuff,

0:35:39.272 --> 0:35:43.552
<v Speaker 3>which was absolutely insane and at least mildly entertaining. Brian

0:35:43.632 --> 0:35:48.991
<v Speaker 3>Higgins admits to destroying his phone, not backing it up,

0:35:49.112 --> 0:35:53.312
<v Speaker 3>and taking the SIM card out of his phone and

0:35:53.592 --> 0:35:56.832
<v Speaker 3>driving to a military base to dispose of it in

0:35:56.911 --> 0:36:00.392
<v Speaker 3>a bag along with his phone, and the only thing

0:36:00.672 --> 0:36:04.712
<v Speaker 3>that he saved were his text between Karen and John.

0:36:05.872 --> 0:36:08.832
<v Speaker 2>And to be clear, this is the Brian that was

0:36:08.872 --> 0:36:14.951
<v Speaker 2>sharing flirtatious text messages with correct. Okay, I want to

0:36:14.951 --> 0:36:19.232
<v Speaker 2>bring in a search term used by Karen, either before

0:36:19.312 --> 0:36:21.672
<v Speaker 2>or after she found John's body, because it's also a

0:36:21.712 --> 0:36:24.672
<v Speaker 2>really important thing to bring in. The text or the

0:36:24.752 --> 0:36:28.872
<v Speaker 2>search is how long to die in cold? Why was

0:36:28.911 --> 0:36:30.872
<v Speaker 2>that so heavily scrutinized.

0:36:32.431 --> 0:36:38.152
<v Speaker 3>Jennifer McCabe is the prosecution's star witness, or so they think,

0:36:38.431 --> 0:36:41.112
<v Speaker 3>and they put her on the stand. She's very confident

0:36:41.232 --> 0:36:44.272
<v Speaker 3>on her first day on the stand against some pretty

0:36:44.312 --> 0:36:48.792
<v Speaker 3>tough cross examination. But there's this Google search that happened

0:36:49.991 --> 0:36:52.992
<v Speaker 3>at around six point thirty in the morning, six twenty

0:36:53.031 --> 0:36:57.991
<v Speaker 3>two and six twenty three am, where she says that

0:36:58.392 --> 0:37:01.471
<v Speaker 3>Karen told her to google how long does it take

0:37:01.551 --> 0:37:03.872
<v Speaker 3>for a person to die in the cold, And because

0:37:03.872 --> 0:37:08.111
<v Speaker 3>it's such a chaotic scene, it's so cool, she mistypes

0:37:08.152 --> 0:37:10.471
<v Speaker 3>it and ends up being like how slung to die

0:37:10.511 --> 0:37:14.111
<v Speaker 3>in cold? And colds? Misspelled? And how's misspelled? And the

0:37:14.152 --> 0:37:18.991
<v Speaker 3>search is done twice. But when this data is analyzed

0:37:19.072 --> 0:37:22.752
<v Speaker 3>by this company called Celebrate, it turns out that the

0:37:22.832 --> 0:37:28.352
<v Speaker 3>first time this was searched was at two twenty seven am.

0:37:28.752 --> 0:37:34.111
<v Speaker 3>So if Jennifer McCabe, the sister in law of the homeowner,

0:37:34.832 --> 0:37:37.191
<v Speaker 3>was searching how long to die in the cold at

0:37:37.192 --> 0:37:44.272
<v Speaker 3>two twenty seven am, this exonerates Karen because clearly someone

0:37:44.792 --> 0:37:48.872
<v Speaker 3>in that house knew that someone was outside dying and

0:37:48.911 --> 0:37:54.792
<v Speaker 3>they did nothing about it. However, the Celebrate expert that

0:37:54.872 --> 0:38:02.072
<v Speaker 3>the prosecution uses says this search did not take place

0:38:02.232 --> 0:38:05.792
<v Speaker 3>at two twenty seven in the morning. She had a

0:38:05.872 --> 0:38:09.392
<v Speaker 3>browse are opened at twenty seven in the morning, and

0:38:09.431 --> 0:38:12.272
<v Speaker 3>when she went to go Google it at six twenty

0:38:12.272 --> 0:38:16.792
<v Speaker 3>two in the morning, it made it look like because

0:38:16.832 --> 0:38:19.272
<v Speaker 3>she had just used the same browser that she was

0:38:19.352 --> 0:38:22.111
<v Speaker 3>using at two thirty am looking up basketball stuff for

0:38:22.152 --> 0:38:24.511
<v Speaker 3>her daughter, it made it look like the search was

0:38:24.551 --> 0:38:28.312
<v Speaker 3>actually performed then, but that's just when the browser was

0:38:28.392 --> 0:38:35.072
<v Speaker 3>last used. However, the defense argues the opposite that they

0:38:35.112 --> 0:38:38.392
<v Speaker 3>have a newer version of the Celebrate data and that

0:38:38.511 --> 0:38:41.752
<v Speaker 3>proves that the search was conducted at two twenty seven

0:38:41.832 --> 0:38:46.752
<v Speaker 3>am and also again when instructed by Karen Reid to

0:38:46.872 --> 0:38:51.192
<v Speaker 3>perform the search. So I mean, ultimately, if the search

0:38:51.272 --> 0:38:54.192
<v Speaker 3>did not happen at two twenty seven am, this evidence

0:38:54.272 --> 0:38:57.272
<v Speaker 3>is completely like moot, it doesn't matter. But this is

0:38:57.312 --> 0:39:01.071
<v Speaker 3>like three days of the trial is going over this

0:39:01.192 --> 0:39:01.832
<v Speaker 3>search term.

0:39:02.072 --> 0:39:04.951
<v Speaker 2>Well, this just gives you a taste of just how

0:39:04.991 --> 0:39:09.992
<v Speaker 2>confusing this hest becomes and how complicated all of these

0:39:10.511 --> 0:39:14.471
<v Speaker 2>moving parts are. I don't envy the jury. How did

0:39:14.551 --> 0:39:15.232
<v Speaker 2>that go with it?

0:39:16.431 --> 0:39:19.392
<v Speaker 3>So the jury deliberated for over twenty hours over the

0:39:19.431 --> 0:39:23.752
<v Speaker 3>course of five days and lawng Crime. We live streamed

0:39:23.792 --> 0:39:28.872
<v Speaker 3>the entire trial. We had forty thousand people watching. I

0:39:28.872 --> 0:39:31.032
<v Speaker 3>think like at the most there was like fifty thousand

0:39:31.031 --> 0:39:34.272
<v Speaker 3>people on the live stream at the highest peak. And

0:39:35.272 --> 0:39:38.192
<v Speaker 3>it was a Friday afternoon. Everyone thought, we're going to

0:39:38.232 --> 0:39:41.111
<v Speaker 3>get a verdict. The jurors surely want to be done

0:39:41.152 --> 0:39:43.752
<v Speaker 3>with this, right, Well, no, they decide they want to

0:39:43.752 --> 0:39:45.671
<v Speaker 3>take the weekend to think about it, and they come

0:39:45.712 --> 0:39:50.111
<v Speaker 3>back on Monday and they say they're deadlocked. They say

0:39:50.112 --> 0:39:54.431
<v Speaker 3>they cannot come to a unanimous decision and that if

0:39:54.511 --> 0:40:00.952
<v Speaker 3>they were to continue deliberating, it would only result in

0:40:01.031 --> 0:40:05.991
<v Speaker 3>one of them having to compromise on their beliefs, and

0:40:06.392 --> 0:40:08.592
<v Speaker 3>they didn't feel like they were going to be able

0:40:08.632 --> 0:40:12.312
<v Speaker 3>to do that, And so they deliver this super eloquent

0:40:12.431 --> 0:40:15.872
<v Speaker 3>message to the judge. The judge accepts it and declares

0:40:16.031 --> 0:40:20.192
<v Speaker 3>a mistrial, which did not surprise a lot of the

0:40:20.272 --> 0:40:24.591
<v Speaker 3>legal analysts and reporters watching this case, because, as you

0:40:24.632 --> 0:40:28.712
<v Speaker 3>can tell everything we've talked about, this was pretty complicated.

0:40:28.951 --> 0:40:31.272
<v Speaker 3>You know, in essence, it's a he said, she said

0:40:31.551 --> 0:40:34.192
<v Speaker 3>with a lot of the evidence, like they say this

0:40:34.312 --> 0:40:36.471
<v Speaker 3>tail light evidence was there, and the other side says

0:40:36.471 --> 0:40:39.552
<v Speaker 3>it wasn't. And so that's basically like the Google search,

0:40:40.112 --> 0:40:44.672
<v Speaker 3>the tail light, the body itself, everything has two sides

0:40:44.712 --> 0:40:47.952
<v Speaker 3>to it, and so it's no surprise that these jurors

0:40:47.991 --> 0:40:51.872
<v Speaker 3>weren't unable to come to a unanimous decision. In my opinion, Well,

0:40:51.911 --> 0:40:52.111
<v Speaker 3>at the.

0:40:52.152 --> 0:40:53.752
<v Speaker 2>End of the day, all you have to do is

0:40:53.832 --> 0:40:56.471
<v Speaker 2>prove that there is reasonable doubt.

0:40:57.312 --> 0:41:00.591
<v Speaker 3>Well exactly, and so a lot of people that we

0:41:00.672 --> 0:41:04.352
<v Speaker 3>talked to for the podcast actually said that that was

0:41:04.471 --> 0:41:08.471
<v Speaker 3>an interesting position for Alan Jackson and David Ynetti to take,

0:41:09.192 --> 0:41:12.392
<v Speaker 3>was to come up with this third culprit theory. And

0:41:12.431 --> 0:41:14.872
<v Speaker 3>you know, they fought in pre trial hearings to even

0:41:14.911 --> 0:41:19.431
<v Speaker 3>be able to bring this into the trial because the

0:41:19.471 --> 0:41:22.071
<v Speaker 3>American legal system is absolutely insane. You have to like

0:41:22.152 --> 0:41:26.072
<v Speaker 3>have a bajillion pre trial hearings in order to present

0:41:26.232 --> 0:41:29.671
<v Speaker 3>anything that you basically want to say, And so they

0:41:29.712 --> 0:41:32.991
<v Speaker 3>had to get permission to be able to say, if

0:41:33.031 --> 0:41:37.111
<v Speaker 3>she didn't do it, someone else did, and we want

0:41:37.152 --> 0:41:39.951
<v Speaker 3>to say there's a third party culprit, and we want

0:41:40.031 --> 0:41:43.511
<v Speaker 3>to explain how we think it happened. And so a

0:41:43.511 --> 0:41:46.832
<v Speaker 3>lot of people said there was enough reasonable doubt without

0:41:46.991 --> 0:41:50.712
<v Speaker 3>even this theory that he was beat up in the home,

0:41:51.152 --> 0:41:54.591
<v Speaker 3>dragged out of the back the basement, left there to

0:41:54.712 --> 0:41:57.352
<v Speaker 3>die by this group of people, and that fifty people

0:41:57.392 --> 0:42:00.911
<v Speaker 3>in the end end up agreeing to this one story

0:42:01.112 --> 0:42:04.632
<v Speaker 3>to protect themselves and blame it all on this one woman.

0:42:05.392 --> 0:42:08.752
<v Speaker 3>Was that even necessary, because if you strip all that away,

0:42:09.632 --> 0:42:13.112
<v Speaker 3>there is so much reasonable doubt even with the story

0:42:13.192 --> 0:42:17.392
<v Speaker 3>the prosecution wanted the jury to believe. So if this

0:42:17.551 --> 0:42:20.352
<v Speaker 3>case does end up going to a new trial, which

0:42:20.632 --> 0:42:23.392
<v Speaker 3>the prosecution has said that they intend to retry the case,

0:42:24.112 --> 0:42:26.672
<v Speaker 3>Karen's team says that they are ready for the fight.

0:42:27.471 --> 0:42:31.072
<v Speaker 3>But there was a motion to dismiss in early August,

0:42:31.511 --> 0:42:34.352
<v Speaker 3>and the judge is still considering that motion as we

0:42:34.392 --> 0:42:38.231
<v Speaker 3>speak now, and the new trials already set for late

0:42:38.312 --> 0:42:40.191
<v Speaker 3>January five five.

0:42:41.551 --> 0:42:44.272
<v Speaker 2>A few things did happen not long after that mistrial,

0:42:44.312 --> 0:42:46.911
<v Speaker 2>which is not that long ago from when we're having

0:42:46.951 --> 0:42:51.152
<v Speaker 2>this conversation Michael Procter. He was relieved of his duty

0:42:51.272 --> 0:42:55.312
<v Speaker 2>then suspended without pay. Was that surprising, not at all.

0:42:55.392 --> 0:42:59.272
<v Speaker 3>I think a lot of people were suspecting that they

0:42:59.312 --> 0:43:02.272
<v Speaker 3>wanted to relieve him of his duties during the trial,

0:43:02.352 --> 0:43:06.312
<v Speaker 3>but they didn't want to complicate matters or mess up

0:43:06.471 --> 0:43:09.952
<v Speaker 3>the case for the prosecution. So, yeah, he was relieved

0:43:09.951 --> 0:43:13.272
<v Speaker 3>of his duties. And then it's revealed that there are

0:43:13.352 --> 0:43:15.751
<v Speaker 3>two more people from the state Police that are being

0:43:15.792 --> 0:43:21.552
<v Speaker 3>investigated for their actions in this case. So that's three

0:43:23.431 --> 0:43:28.832
<v Speaker 3>investigators compromised. And that's a problem for the prosecution because

0:43:28.832 --> 0:43:30.392
<v Speaker 3>if you really are going to want to bring this

0:43:30.511 --> 0:43:33.191
<v Speaker 3>case to trial, you have three poison apples who are

0:43:33.312 --> 0:43:36.991
<v Speaker 3>supposed to be your line of protection, Like these are

0:43:37.031 --> 0:43:39.712
<v Speaker 3>the people that were supposed to trust or the authority.

0:43:39.712 --> 0:43:41.872
<v Speaker 3>We're supposed to be able to believe everything that they

0:43:41.872 --> 0:43:45.192
<v Speaker 3>say on the stand because they're the ones investigating. And

0:43:46.232 --> 0:43:47.711
<v Speaker 3>what do you do after that?

0:43:49.152 --> 0:43:51.471
<v Speaker 2>Do you honestly think, after digging so deep into this

0:43:51.592 --> 0:43:55.431
<v Speaker 2>case that we could see a different result if this

0:43:55.511 --> 0:43:56.392
<v Speaker 2>goes to trial again?

0:43:57.672 --> 0:44:00.191
<v Speaker 3>It's hard to say. I mean, I do wonder how

0:44:00.272 --> 0:44:03.352
<v Speaker 3>the defense would maybe change course, if they're going to

0:44:03.471 --> 0:44:07.872
<v Speaker 3>still stick with this third party call brit Defense, or

0:44:08.031 --> 0:44:11.991
<v Speaker 3>if they are just going to allow the prosecution to

0:44:12.112 --> 0:44:15.232
<v Speaker 3>dig their own graves, so to speak, and just allow

0:44:15.392 --> 0:44:20.312
<v Speaker 3>the reasonable doubt to shine, because there really is no

0:44:20.511 --> 0:44:27.152
<v Speaker 3>solid proof that Karen Reid killed John O'Keefe, and murder

0:44:27.192 --> 0:44:30.832
<v Speaker 3>too is manslaughter, but there's also no intent there. And

0:44:31.312 --> 0:44:35.312
<v Speaker 3>does this woman deserve to spend upwards of twenty plus

0:44:35.431 --> 0:44:39.232
<v Speaker 3>years in prison for an accident? You know, obviously this

0:44:39.352 --> 0:44:46.072
<v Speaker 3>family deserves justice, and they are very upset with how

0:44:46.872 --> 0:44:50.031
<v Speaker 3>famous this case has become and how Karen Reid's popularity

0:44:50.072 --> 0:44:53.832
<v Speaker 3>has grown over this, and they deserve some kind of closure.

0:44:54.352 --> 0:44:58.352
<v Speaker 3>But I just don't know if any closure will come

0:44:58.352 --> 0:45:03.071
<v Speaker 3>from another trial unless new evidence is uncovered.

0:45:03.911 --> 0:45:05.951
<v Speaker 2>The other thing to come out after the mistrial was

0:45:05.991 --> 0:45:08.511
<v Speaker 2>the RS actually coming forward and speaking, which I'm not

0:45:08.551 --> 0:45:12.192
<v Speaker 2>sure is completely legal, but what did they actually say?

0:45:13.072 --> 0:45:17.712
<v Speaker 3>So after the mistrial was declared and Trooper Proctor was

0:45:17.792 --> 0:45:21.911
<v Speaker 3>fired from the Massachusetts State Police, a lot of jurors,

0:45:22.192 --> 0:45:26.631
<v Speaker 3>forgers to be exact, came forward pretty quickly, and they

0:45:26.672 --> 0:45:29.232
<v Speaker 3>went to Alan Jackson and David Ynetti first, and they said,

0:45:29.792 --> 0:45:34.551
<v Speaker 3>we reached two unanimous decisions. Out of the three charges.

0:45:35.192 --> 0:45:39.231
<v Speaker 3>We reached unanimous decisions on two of the charges. There

0:45:39.272 --> 0:45:42.471
<v Speaker 3>was only one we couldn't agree on, which this was

0:45:42.511 --> 0:45:46.072
<v Speaker 3>actually a big part of the arguments on the defensive

0:45:46.112 --> 0:45:49.191
<v Speaker 3>side during the trial is that the jury instructions were

0:45:49.352 --> 0:45:54.632
<v Speaker 3>very confusing, and they felt that they were purposely confusing,

0:45:54.712 --> 0:45:57.471
<v Speaker 3>and that the judge didn't write them out correctly or

0:45:57.471 --> 0:45:59.991
<v Speaker 3>didn't explain them correctly, and so it could lead to

0:46:00.031 --> 0:46:03.832
<v Speaker 3>something like this happening. And a bunch of jurors then

0:46:03.872 --> 0:46:06.751
<v Speaker 3>went to the District attorney's office and said this thing.

0:46:07.352 --> 0:46:11.671
<v Speaker 3>And the reason why this is important is because in

0:46:11.712 --> 0:46:15.911
<v Speaker 3>the United States of America, there's this rule called double jeopardy,

0:46:16.312 --> 0:46:22.272
<v Speaker 3>and you cannot be prosecuted again for the same charges

0:46:22.672 --> 0:46:28.071
<v Speaker 3>if a jury found you innocent of them. And so

0:46:28.152 --> 0:46:31.152
<v Speaker 3>the only one they couldn't come to a conclusion on

0:46:32.072 --> 0:46:33.832
<v Speaker 3>was the one that had to do with the vehicle.

0:46:34.592 --> 0:46:38.232
<v Speaker 2>So they agreed on the murder charge. Well, the manslaugh

0:46:38.232 --> 0:46:38.792
<v Speaker 2>to of charge.

0:46:39.232 --> 0:46:42.911
<v Speaker 3>Yes, the jury was unanimous in finding read not guilty

0:46:42.991 --> 0:46:47.552
<v Speaker 3>of second degree murder and leaving the scene of personal

0:46:47.592 --> 0:46:52.392
<v Speaker 3>injury and death. They found her unanimously innocent, not guilty

0:46:52.551 --> 0:46:56.632
<v Speaker 3>of these charges on manslaughter and the lesser included charges.

0:46:56.951 --> 0:47:00.112
<v Speaker 3>The juror said the jury's final vote was a quote

0:47:00.192 --> 0:47:08.431
<v Speaker 3>soft nine to three, with nine voting guilty. So this

0:47:08.712 --> 0:47:11.551
<v Speaker 3>is something that the judge is really going to have

0:47:11.632 --> 0:47:14.072
<v Speaker 3>to consider very seriously, and that's why I'm not surprised

0:47:14.072 --> 0:47:16.911
<v Speaker 3>that it's taking her quite a long time to come

0:47:16.951 --> 0:47:17.712
<v Speaker 3>to this decision.

0:47:18.632 --> 0:47:19.991
<v Speaker 2>With all of that in mind, I'm going to ask

0:47:20.031 --> 0:47:23.911
<v Speaker 2>one final question. Do you think the Internet and the

0:47:23.951 --> 0:47:27.031
<v Speaker 2>Free Karen movement, given all of this stuff that's come

0:47:27.072 --> 0:47:29.911
<v Speaker 2>out since the mistrial, do you think this is just

0:47:29.911 --> 0:47:30.872
<v Speaker 2>going to keep exploding?

0:47:32.112 --> 0:47:35.192
<v Speaker 3>I do, and I think that Turtle Boy's going to

0:47:35.232 --> 0:47:36.832
<v Speaker 3>have a lot to do with that. You know, he

0:47:37.031 --> 0:47:41.431
<v Speaker 3>got a lot of fame from this. He says that

0:47:41.551 --> 0:47:47.471
<v Speaker 3>he's received a podcast and movie deal, and the TikTok

0:47:47.752 --> 0:47:52.631
<v Speaker 3>In Couch detectives are still at it with exposing what

0:47:52.712 --> 0:47:56.792
<v Speaker 3>they think are important details that, of course, you can't

0:47:57.031 --> 0:48:02.431
<v Speaker 3>prove in any courtroom. And I think that the Internet

0:48:02.511 --> 0:48:05.272
<v Speaker 3>is a perfect place for a conspiracy theory to grow

0:48:05.392 --> 0:48:10.072
<v Speaker 3>and grow and grow and grow. And if the judge

0:48:10.072 --> 0:48:12.712
<v Speaker 3>comes back and says we're not going to try this

0:48:12.832 --> 0:48:17.111
<v Speaker 3>case again. I think it would die out eventually, but

0:48:17.232 --> 0:48:20.712
<v Speaker 3>if she says no, we're going back to trial, this

0:48:20.832 --> 0:48:23.592
<v Speaker 3>is never going to die. It's going to get even

0:48:23.632 --> 0:48:28.232
<v Speaker 3>more attention because there's a Netflix documentary coming out. You know,

0:48:28.312 --> 0:48:31.071
<v Speaker 3>our podcast is out. Your podcast is going to be

0:48:31.072 --> 0:48:34.392
<v Speaker 3>coming out. Every true crime podcast is talking about this,

0:48:34.511 --> 0:48:37.152
<v Speaker 3>and so there's going to be probably like ten times

0:48:37.192 --> 0:48:40.992
<v Speaker 3>the amount of ears and eyeballs on this then there

0:48:41.152 --> 0:48:45.552
<v Speaker 3>was in the first place. And so, unfortunately, conspiracy theories

0:48:45.911 --> 0:48:49.792
<v Speaker 3>and really interesting cases like this are just bound to

0:48:49.832 --> 0:48:53.671
<v Speaker 3>grow and grow and grow until someone says, Okay, here's

0:48:53.712 --> 0:48:54.312
<v Speaker 3>your closure.

0:48:59.511 --> 0:49:02.152
<v Speaker 2>Thanks to Jessica for assisting us to tell this story.

0:49:02.592 --> 0:49:05.631
<v Speaker 2>True Crime Conversations is Amma Ma a podcast hosted and

0:49:05.672 --> 0:49:09.471
<v Speaker 2>produced by Jemma Bath with audio design by Scott Stronik.

0:49:10.031 --> 0:49:13.912
<v Speaker 2>Our senior producer is Crystal kor Nielssen. Thanks for listening.

0:49:13.991 --> 0:49:16.832
<v Speaker 2>I'll be back next week with another True Crime Conversation.