WEBVTT - The Sabrina Carpenter Interview We Can’t Agree On

0:00:11.464 --> 0:00:14.144
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to Amma Mia podcast.

0:00:14.784 --> 0:00:18.664
<v Speaker 2>Mamma Mia acknowledges the traditional owners of land and borders

0:00:18.744 --> 0:00:25.904
<v Speaker 2>that this podcast is recorded on from MoMA Mia. Welcome

0:00:25.984 --> 0:00:28.704
<v Speaker 2>to the Spill, your daily pop culture fix. I'm m

0:00:28.784 --> 0:00:32.744
<v Speaker 2>Vernham and I'm a London. A little surprise, Laura Bronnick

0:00:32.864 --> 0:00:35.864
<v Speaker 2>is still somewhere on a cruise somewhere in Europe living

0:00:35.864 --> 0:00:40.824
<v Speaker 2>her best life. And West are Kids working. If you

0:00:40.864 --> 0:00:42.904
<v Speaker 2>don't know Ash, where the hell have you been?

0:00:43.064 --> 0:00:43.264
<v Speaker 1>Ash?

0:00:43.304 --> 0:00:46.024
<v Speaker 2>You filled in a few times on this podcast. You

0:00:46.104 --> 0:00:48.784
<v Speaker 2>also had a radio show, Ash London Live, and I

0:00:48.824 --> 0:00:51.584
<v Speaker 2>remember you've interviewed Tailswift, Big Deep.

0:00:53.464 --> 0:00:54.464
<v Speaker 1>It always comes off.

0:00:57.224 --> 0:00:58.944
<v Speaker 2>And you have a new podcast.

0:00:59.384 --> 0:01:02.104
<v Speaker 3>Yes, it's called Hopeless Romantics and it's all about romance

0:01:02.184 --> 0:01:03.304
<v Speaker 3>books and films.

0:01:03.544 --> 0:01:04.584
<v Speaker 1>It's pretty much me and.

0:01:04.544 --> 0:01:10.304
<v Speaker 3>Guests swooning over book boyfriends, movie boyfriends, sex scenes, romantic scene.

0:01:10.744 --> 0:01:13.264
<v Speaker 1>It's so much fun and I absolutely love doing.

0:01:13.144 --> 0:01:14.584
<v Speaker 3>It and it's a great excuse for me to just

0:01:14.624 --> 0:01:17.384
<v Speaker 3>read romance books and watch rom coms all day.

0:01:17.424 --> 0:01:18.744
<v Speaker 1>And my husband kind of even get angry.

0:01:18.824 --> 0:01:21.104
<v Speaker 3>I'll be like, we need to watch House of the Dragon,

0:01:21.104 --> 0:01:22.544
<v Speaker 3>and so it'll be like, so maybe it's work.

0:01:22.664 --> 0:01:23.384
<v Speaker 1>We have to watch.

0:01:23.464 --> 0:01:25.664
<v Speaker 2>I'm making money off of this exactly.

0:01:25.784 --> 0:01:28.304
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to watch Irish Wish starring Lindsay Lohan a

0:01:28.304 --> 0:01:32.904
<v Speaker 3>second time this week because it's well.

0:01:32.944 --> 0:01:36.544
<v Speaker 2>On the show today, we are talking about Sabrina Carpenter's

0:01:36.624 --> 0:01:39.624
<v Speaker 2>new interview with Riety. Some of the stuff Sabrina said

0:01:39.704 --> 0:01:42.664
<v Speaker 2>has got me and Ash disagreeing with each other.

0:01:43.304 --> 0:01:43.704
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:01:43.784 --> 0:01:46.184
<v Speaker 3>I don't know what it is. Maybe it's an age thing,

0:01:46.624 --> 0:01:49.424
<v Speaker 3>maybe it's just different perspectives on her career. But I

0:01:49.424 --> 0:01:52.064
<v Speaker 3>love a bit of disagreement. There's nothing wrong with that.

0:01:52.184 --> 0:01:52.984
<v Speaker 2>There's nothing wrong.

0:01:53.904 --> 0:01:56.704
<v Speaker 1>It's what the world needs more of people disagree nicely.

0:01:57.944 --> 0:02:00.664
<v Speaker 2>I agree with our disagreement. Yeah, one hundred percent, thank you.

0:02:00.784 --> 0:02:02.224
<v Speaker 2>But first, do you have some news for me?

0:02:02.384 --> 0:02:02.584
<v Speaker 1>Yes?

0:02:02.624 --> 0:02:05.144
<v Speaker 3>I'm really excited about this because I am thirty eight

0:02:05.224 --> 0:02:08.224
<v Speaker 3>years old, which means that when The Simple Life og

0:02:09.464 --> 0:02:12.624
<v Speaker 3>as Indie Paris Shilton Nicole Richie reality TV show, when

0:02:12.664 --> 0:02:15.784
<v Speaker 3>it first came out, I was watching it in real

0:02:15.824 --> 0:02:16.184
<v Speaker 3>time and.

0:02:19.104 --> 0:02:21.824
<v Speaker 1>Understanding that you don't have to saying that history with

0:02:21.904 --> 0:02:22.224
<v Speaker 1>the show.

0:02:22.424 --> 0:02:22.584
<v Speaker 3>No.

0:02:22.824 --> 0:02:25.344
<v Speaker 2>I remember saying when I was in my Tumblr era,

0:02:25.504 --> 0:02:28.184
<v Speaker 2>like a lot of the reblogs was of Nicole Ritchie

0:02:28.224 --> 0:02:30.584
<v Speaker 2>and Paris Hilton in that era, and they looked very cool.

0:02:30.704 --> 0:02:33.344
<v Speaker 2>But that's like the most I knew about it, fair enough.

0:02:33.864 --> 0:02:38.504
<v Speaker 3>Reality TV was a very new thing. Nowadays, every TV

0:02:38.584 --> 0:02:40.864
<v Speaker 3>show on television is reality, but back then it was not.

0:02:40.944 --> 0:02:43.504
<v Speaker 3>There was no social media. It was a huge deal

0:02:43.584 --> 0:02:46.424
<v Speaker 3>to have this insight into the lives of Nicole Ritchie

0:02:46.464 --> 0:02:50.064
<v Speaker 3>and Paris Hilton, and this show was responsible for so

0:02:50.304 --> 0:02:53.784
<v Speaker 3>many quotable moments of the age. The reason we're talking

0:02:53.824 --> 0:02:56.224
<v Speaker 3>about it is because they're rebooting it, which is crazy

0:02:56.264 --> 0:02:59.824
<v Speaker 3>because they've both gone on to have huge careers and families.

0:02:59.864 --> 0:03:02.224
<v Speaker 3>We now know that we've got more backstory on them.

0:03:02.344 --> 0:03:04.704
<v Speaker 3>They probably don't even need to do this, but they're

0:03:04.744 --> 0:03:07.544
<v Speaker 3>doing it, which I think is unbelievable. So we don't

0:03:07.584 --> 0:03:10.024
<v Speaker 3>know much about it thought other than that was spotted

0:03:10.064 --> 0:03:12.784
<v Speaker 3>in Q outfits that kind of match, which I'm.

0:03:12.984 --> 0:03:13.984
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely was that.

0:03:13.984 --> 0:03:16.504
<v Speaker 2>That thing was that that thing in the.

0:03:15.904 --> 0:03:18.384
<v Speaker 3>Original The crazy thing was that Nicole Richie back then

0:03:18.424 --> 0:03:21.784
<v Speaker 3>would have been like a size twelve and free leed

0:03:21.944 --> 0:03:25.064
<v Speaker 3>f Wood was used so often to describe her and.

0:03:24.944 --> 0:03:26.984
<v Speaker 1>As a young teenager, that was very normal.

0:03:27.064 --> 0:03:28.704
<v Speaker 3>And then you look back on it now and you're like,

0:03:29.544 --> 0:03:32.184
<v Speaker 3>what the heck I do have a bit of audio

0:03:32.184 --> 0:03:33.664
<v Speaker 3>that I want to play for you, which I think

0:03:33.944 --> 0:03:36.344
<v Speaker 3>if you are not familiar with the Simple Life, is

0:03:36.384 --> 0:03:39.264
<v Speaker 3>something that will kind of contextualize it very nicely for you.

0:03:39.384 --> 0:03:44.104
<v Speaker 2>Now, do you guys hang out at Walmart? I've always

0:03:44.144 --> 0:03:45.704
<v Speaker 2>heard the people hang out at Walmart?

0:03:45.904 --> 0:03:50.464
<v Speaker 1>Why I don't want to because like they're so often.

0:03:52.224 --> 0:03:54.704
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Paris Hilton didn't know what Walmart was. That was

0:03:54.744 --> 0:03:58.264
<v Speaker 3>this one tiny grab of like over and over these girls.

0:03:58.584 --> 0:04:02.184
<v Speaker 1>They were so funny and they were so removed from reality,

0:04:02.624 --> 0:04:05.024
<v Speaker 1>but it was real. I don't think they were faking

0:04:05.104 --> 0:04:07.704
<v Speaker 1>half of it. Like, why would Paris Hilton go to Walmart?

0:04:07.864 --> 0:04:10.144
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? Is this way she kind of got like her

0:04:10.424 --> 0:04:14.944
<v Speaker 2>quote unquote dumb persona was from this series because now

0:04:14.984 --> 0:04:18.064
<v Speaker 2>when you see her shows, like when she did that

0:04:18.184 --> 0:04:21.904
<v Speaker 2>Netflix series Cooking with Paris, I really liked her and

0:04:21.944 --> 0:04:23.744
<v Speaker 2>I was like, is this the kind of same persona

0:04:23.784 --> 0:04:26.464
<v Speaker 2>she was putting on like from the beginning, or has

0:04:26.464 --> 0:04:28.704
<v Speaker 2>she now kind of like shifted her ways.

0:04:28.824 --> 0:04:30.864
<v Speaker 3>It's the same persona. And when you watch it through

0:04:30.864 --> 0:04:33.144
<v Speaker 3>that lens, you realize how much she is because she

0:04:33.264 --> 0:04:36.784
<v Speaker 3>is playing a character the whole time. She knows what

0:04:36.864 --> 0:04:39.784
<v Speaker 3>to say, she knows how to play it. It's going

0:04:39.864 --> 0:04:42.104
<v Speaker 3>to be funny. And especially now that we know what

0:04:42.144 --> 0:04:46.304
<v Speaker 3>we know about Paris and how deeply traumatic her childhood was,

0:04:46.784 --> 0:04:50.064
<v Speaker 3>I think it's even more incredible to watch her go

0:04:50.184 --> 0:04:52.464
<v Speaker 3>out and just be hilarious and own this.

0:04:53.184 --> 0:04:54.664
<v Speaker 1>And I don't know what they're going to do with this.

0:04:54.944 --> 0:04:57.264
<v Speaker 3>It's such a crazy thing to reboot something twenty years

0:04:57.344 --> 0:04:59.904
<v Speaker 3>later when your lives are so different. So I have

0:04:59.984 --> 0:05:01.744
<v Speaker 3>no idea what it's going to be like, but I

0:05:01.784 --> 0:05:04.784
<v Speaker 3>hope that they go back to that kind of tongue

0:05:04.824 --> 0:05:05.504
<v Speaker 3>in cheek.

0:05:05.944 --> 0:05:06.944
<v Speaker 1>We don't know anything.

0:05:07.704 --> 0:05:11.224
<v Speaker 3>We can get away with saying kind of problem things

0:05:11.544 --> 0:05:13.744
<v Speaker 3>because it's we're the ones that are being laughed at.

0:05:13.944 --> 0:05:16.704
<v Speaker 3>I love Nicole Richie, I love Parasitalton. I'm cheering them on.

0:05:17.024 --> 0:05:18.224
<v Speaker 3>Go the simple life.

0:05:18.344 --> 0:05:21.744
<v Speaker 2>Go the simple life. You sold me, Dana Nana. So,

0:05:21.824 --> 0:05:25.704
<v Speaker 2>Sabrina Carpenter has done a new feature interview with Variety

0:05:25.824 --> 0:05:30.024
<v Speaker 2>about her life and career and her repertoire. So we

0:05:30.424 --> 0:05:32.704
<v Speaker 2>need to unpack some of the stuff, she said. The

0:05:32.744 --> 0:05:35.664
<v Speaker 2>interview starts off. I think they're in some like music store.

0:05:35.824 --> 0:05:38.544
<v Speaker 2>I love the interviews where they like have a full setting.

0:05:38.584 --> 0:05:39.904
<v Speaker 2>So I feel like I'm actually there.

0:05:40.224 --> 0:05:43.464
<v Speaker 3>It's very nineteen nineties if that doesn't happen anymore, because

0:05:43.504 --> 0:05:45.584
<v Speaker 3>we don't have a lot of these big cover stories.

0:05:45.624 --> 0:05:48.344
<v Speaker 3>And back then, yeah, the journalists would use a cafe,

0:05:48.504 --> 0:05:50.304
<v Speaker 3>they would use a cool shop, they would maybe go

0:05:50.344 --> 0:05:52.464
<v Speaker 3>to a couple of the places that the artists loved.

0:05:52.504 --> 0:05:55.304
<v Speaker 3>These days, it's like probably just on zoom, so good

0:05:55.304 --> 0:05:56.584
<v Speaker 3>on you variety.

0:05:56.224 --> 0:05:58.624
<v Speaker 2>Good on your variety. And it's so interesting that you

0:05:58.664 --> 0:06:00.544
<v Speaker 2>said it's very nineteen nineties, because I feel like that

0:06:00.624 --> 0:06:03.144
<v Speaker 2>is Sabrina Carpenter's look that she goes for. It's like

0:06:03.184 --> 0:06:05.864
<v Speaker 2>the nineties bombshell look. So maybe that was like a

0:06:05.864 --> 0:06:07.544
<v Speaker 2>little thing they were trying to get into, and they

0:06:07.544 --> 0:06:11.184
<v Speaker 2>were talking about some previous musicians that she found really interesting.

0:06:11.984 --> 0:06:17.464
<v Speaker 2>But there was a part that I just couldn't stop

0:06:17.504 --> 0:06:20.864
<v Speaker 2>thinking about, and that was when they were talking about

0:06:20.904 --> 0:06:25.424
<v Speaker 2>her relationship. So the interviewer first brought up the love

0:06:25.544 --> 0:06:30.504
<v Speaker 2>triangle Sabrina Carpenter was in with Joshua Bassett and Olivia Rodrigo.

0:06:31.104 --> 0:06:35.984
<v Speaker 2>That was I think the first time audiences who weren't

0:06:36.024 --> 0:06:39.784
<v Speaker 2>just her gen Z like Disney fans started to recognize

0:06:39.784 --> 0:06:42.704
<v Speaker 2>her because we love like a little celebrity love triangle.

0:06:42.944 --> 0:06:44.624
<v Speaker 2>And also I think that was a time where Olivia

0:06:44.704 --> 0:06:46.904
<v Speaker 2>Rodrigo was getting really big and we were like, who's

0:06:46.904 --> 0:06:48.664
<v Speaker 2>this girl she's talking about in all the songs.

0:06:50.384 --> 0:06:52.984
<v Speaker 3>So I was aware of Sabrina Carpenter before I was

0:06:52.984 --> 0:06:56.064
<v Speaker 3>aware of Olivia. But it was very obvious from the

0:06:56.184 --> 0:06:58.504
<v Speaker 3>very start with Olivia that she was about to be

0:06:59.104 --> 0:07:02.224
<v Speaker 3>absolutely huge. And what I love the most about the

0:07:02.224 --> 0:07:04.064
<v Speaker 3>whole thing is that both of the women in that

0:07:04.104 --> 0:07:08.104
<v Speaker 3>love triangle, both of their careers have exploded. And oldmate Josh,

0:07:08.304 --> 0:07:09.304
<v Speaker 3>what the fuck's he doing?

0:07:10.704 --> 0:07:14.064
<v Speaker 2>Speaking of relationships, there was a part in the interview

0:07:14.104 --> 0:07:15.864
<v Speaker 2>that I wanted to talk to you about, and it

0:07:15.944 --> 0:07:19.184
<v Speaker 2>was when she was talking about her current relationship with

0:07:19.624 --> 0:07:23.064
<v Speaker 2>Barry Kurogan, who stars in Saltburn. Everyone knows him. He

0:07:23.184 --> 0:07:25.824
<v Speaker 2>was massive on the big Oscars run. I'm just going

0:07:25.904 --> 0:07:27.784
<v Speaker 2>to read out this little excerpt which was a quote

0:07:27.784 --> 0:07:30.984
<v Speaker 2>from her. So she was talking about her new song

0:07:31.064 --> 0:07:32.304
<v Speaker 2>Please Please Please.

0:07:32.104 --> 0:07:34.744
<v Speaker 1>Please, Please Please Please.

0:07:36.784 --> 0:07:39.664
<v Speaker 2>It also stars him as her love interest in the

0:07:39.744 --> 0:07:45.584
<v Speaker 2>music video, so obviously I feel like if you put

0:07:45.624 --> 0:07:48.224
<v Speaker 2>your boyfriend in your music video, you can't avoid talking

0:07:48.264 --> 0:07:50.744
<v Speaker 2>about him, So she obviously had to spill Beans, and

0:07:50.824 --> 0:07:53.824
<v Speaker 2>she said he loved the song. He's obsessed with the lyrics,

0:07:53.864 --> 0:07:56.024
<v Speaker 2>and I'm so grateful for that. I don't want to

0:07:56.064 --> 0:07:58.104
<v Speaker 2>sound biased, but I think he's one of the best

0:07:58.144 --> 0:08:01.504
<v Speaker 2>actors of his generation. So getting to see him on

0:08:01.544 --> 0:08:03.904
<v Speaker 2>the screen with my song as a soundtrack made the

0:08:03.984 --> 0:08:06.104
<v Speaker 2>video better and all the more special.

0:08:07.904 --> 0:08:10.024
<v Speaker 3>The first of all, I just want to say, is

0:08:10.064 --> 0:08:12.464
<v Speaker 3>in my acting involved in being in a music video,

0:08:12.544 --> 0:08:14.984
<v Speaker 3>Like that's a big leak for her to be comparing

0:08:15.104 --> 0:08:16.784
<v Speaker 3>her music video to like Zalburn.

0:08:17.104 --> 0:08:22.424
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I think she was saying that she was lucky.

0:08:22.584 --> 0:08:24.704
<v Speaker 2>If I was saying this quote in the interview, if

0:08:24.704 --> 0:08:29.944
<v Speaker 2>this is me, I pretty much I would want to

0:08:29.984 --> 0:08:34.024
<v Speaker 2>talk about how my boyfriend became really big on this

0:08:34.144 --> 0:08:38.304
<v Speaker 2>massive movie called Salppurn, so I wanted to make money

0:08:38.344 --> 0:08:40.544
<v Speaker 2>off of that since I'm already in a relationship with him,

0:08:40.664 --> 0:08:42.504
<v Speaker 2>so I'm just going to put him in my music video.

0:08:42.624 --> 0:08:44.744
<v Speaker 2>Like That's the business angle that I would have approached

0:08:44.744 --> 0:08:48.584
<v Speaker 2>it with. I think calling him one of the best

0:08:48.624 --> 0:08:53.344
<v Speaker 2>actors of this generation is I wouldn't say far fetched,

0:08:53.464 --> 0:08:58.344
<v Speaker 2>but a bit too a bit too gushy for a

0:08:58.424 --> 0:09:01.664
<v Speaker 2>variety interview. That's meant to be about you and your career.

0:09:02.104 --> 0:09:05.744
<v Speaker 3>I understand what you're saying, but this is still the

0:09:05.784 --> 0:09:09.264
<v Speaker 3>honeymoon period of their relationship. I think for famous people

0:09:09.304 --> 0:09:12.304
<v Speaker 3>the honeymoon period go for longer because they're separated more

0:09:12.344 --> 0:09:14.784
<v Speaker 3>like a people like us, honeymoon is like maybe a

0:09:14.784 --> 0:09:16.344
<v Speaker 3>month because you're seeing in person every day.

0:09:16.584 --> 0:09:17.664
<v Speaker 1>When you're newly.

0:09:17.424 --> 0:09:20.104
<v Speaker 3>Into someone, you gush. Of course, you're telling oh, your

0:09:20.104 --> 0:09:22.904
<v Speaker 3>friends how amazing they are. You can't stop talking about them.

0:09:22.944 --> 0:09:25.784
<v Speaker 3>You insert them into every conversation, even when it's irrelevant.

0:09:25.984 --> 0:09:28.464
<v Speaker 3>So I think we need to extend her some grace

0:09:28.584 --> 0:09:29.664
<v Speaker 3>because that's.

0:09:29.504 --> 0:09:29.984
<v Speaker 1>What you do.

0:09:30.304 --> 0:09:32.144
<v Speaker 3>He's what I think you can do it within the

0:09:32.144 --> 0:09:34.904
<v Speaker 3>first six months of the relationship if you're famous, and

0:09:34.904 --> 0:09:38.184
<v Speaker 3>then after like six years, like if Blake Lively said

0:09:38.184 --> 0:09:40.624
<v Speaker 3>that about Ryan Reynolds, would be like, oh, the dedication

0:09:40.744 --> 0:09:43.184
<v Speaker 3>is so beautiful because they've been together a while, the

0:09:43.264 --> 0:09:46.544
<v Speaker 3>mutual admiration has grown or honeymoon period.

0:09:46.584 --> 0:09:49.144
<v Speaker 1>Anytime in between that is when I think it's cringe.

0:09:49.304 --> 0:09:51.784
<v Speaker 2>I agree that when you're in a relationship you want

0:09:51.784 --> 0:09:54.384
<v Speaker 2>to gush with your friends and family, but where not

0:09:54.424 --> 0:09:57.224
<v Speaker 2>her friends and family, like where her audience, We're on

0:09:57.264 --> 0:09:59.384
<v Speaker 2>her business side of her life, and it's not like

0:09:59.384 --> 0:10:01.264
<v Speaker 2>you and I come on this podcast and we're cushing

0:10:01.304 --> 0:10:04.184
<v Speaker 2>about your partner, like both a muscussion about your partner

0:10:04.584 --> 0:10:06.624
<v Speaker 2>or talking about like the dates I've been on or anything.

0:10:06.984 --> 0:10:10.224
<v Speaker 2>And I think it's just really risky, especially at such

0:10:10.464 --> 0:10:13.544
<v Speaker 2>impressurable age she is, she's younger than me, that she

0:10:13.744 --> 0:10:17.144
<v Speaker 2>is having this massive career, she's performing on world stages,

0:10:17.184 --> 0:10:21.024
<v Speaker 2>she's doing these massive interviews with these huge publications, and

0:10:21.144 --> 0:10:24.584
<v Speaker 2>to use up real estate of these opportunities to talk

0:10:24.624 --> 0:10:27.104
<v Speaker 2>about a boyfriend that you've been with for less than

0:10:27.144 --> 0:10:29.664
<v Speaker 2>a year, I feel like it's really risky and you

0:10:29.744 --> 0:10:31.744
<v Speaker 2>might be regretting it in a few years time.

0:10:32.184 --> 0:10:36.344
<v Speaker 3>I understand, However, I think about this, Okay. All she

0:10:36.464 --> 0:10:40.984
<v Speaker 3>can do is work with the current news cycle, work

0:10:40.984 --> 0:10:44.264
<v Speaker 3>with what's happening moment to moment to keep her career alive.

0:10:44.784 --> 0:10:47.024
<v Speaker 3>So she can't be thinking too much about the future.

0:10:47.184 --> 0:10:49.624
<v Speaker 3>She has to be thinking about in this world where

0:10:49.664 --> 0:10:51.864
<v Speaker 3>so much content is being consumed and put out in

0:10:51.984 --> 0:10:54.544
<v Speaker 3>songs and a new cycle? So quick, how do I

0:10:54.584 --> 0:10:57.184
<v Speaker 3>state in a new cycle today? And you know what,

0:10:57.264 --> 0:10:59.584
<v Speaker 3>it's worked, because what are we doing them? We're sitting

0:10:59.624 --> 0:11:01.824
<v Speaker 3>here on this podcast discussing.

0:11:01.344 --> 0:11:04.784
<v Speaker 2>It that's true is working.

0:11:05.024 --> 0:11:09.384
<v Speaker 3>Like I always say, everything is contrived, nothing is accidental.

0:11:09.744 --> 0:11:11.704
<v Speaker 3>We have to keep this in mind when it comes

0:11:11.744 --> 0:11:14.224
<v Speaker 3>to these celebrities, and it's something we're going to talk

0:11:14.224 --> 0:11:17.424
<v Speaker 3>about in part two of this episode because Taylor Swift

0:11:17.464 --> 0:11:21.264
<v Speaker 3>obviously comes into it as well. Everything these people say

0:11:21.824 --> 0:11:25.664
<v Speaker 3>is for a reason, unless they're like super new artists,

0:11:25.784 --> 0:11:28.424
<v Speaker 3>or they're coming from the Internet where there's less kind

0:11:28.424 --> 0:11:32.264
<v Speaker 3>of management and pr around it and it's sometimes a

0:11:32.264 --> 0:11:32.984
<v Speaker 3>bit more organic.

0:11:33.264 --> 0:11:36.624
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, call me skeptical. I just think.

0:11:36.464 --> 0:11:39.664
<v Speaker 3>Everything is for a reason. And like I said, she

0:11:39.744 --> 0:11:40.504
<v Speaker 3>has to stay.

0:11:40.264 --> 0:11:41.784
<v Speaker 1>In the new sackle minute to minute.

0:11:41.824 --> 0:11:43.504
<v Speaker 3>She can't be thinking about how is this going to

0:11:43.544 --> 0:11:46.464
<v Speaker 3>read in ten years because also in ten years' time,

0:11:46.784 --> 0:11:49.584
<v Speaker 3>think of all the media that would have happened in

0:11:49.624 --> 0:11:51.904
<v Speaker 3>between them and now the albums and the songs and

0:11:51.904 --> 0:11:52.424
<v Speaker 3>the gossip.

0:11:52.784 --> 0:11:53.904
<v Speaker 1>Will we even remember?

0:11:53.984 --> 0:11:57.464
<v Speaker 3>Are artists even thinking about their legacy anymore when everything

0:11:57.544 --> 0:11:58.104
<v Speaker 3>is so quick?

0:11:58.704 --> 0:11:59.824
<v Speaker 1>But I get what you're saying.

0:11:59.944 --> 0:12:01.944
<v Speaker 3>If Please, Please Please is her biggest song ever and

0:12:01.984 --> 0:12:04.104
<v Speaker 3>her boyfriend at the time is in the video.

0:12:04.584 --> 0:12:07.144
<v Speaker 1>Look that could be cringe. I'll give you that. What

0:12:07.184 --> 0:12:08.584
<v Speaker 1>if he turns out to be problematic.

0:12:08.864 --> 0:12:12.024
<v Speaker 3>What if he says something very racist and gets canceled

0:12:12.064 --> 0:12:13.344
<v Speaker 3>and then she stuck with this video.

0:12:13.744 --> 0:12:15.704
<v Speaker 1>It's the risky take, birds.

0:12:15.264 --> 0:12:17.224
<v Speaker 2>It's the risk your take. We will be getting more

0:12:17.304 --> 0:12:19.264
<v Speaker 2>into this interview after the break.

0:12:20.864 --> 0:12:24.104
<v Speaker 3>So quote from Sabrina in this writing interview, she said,

0:12:24.104 --> 0:12:27.344
<v Speaker 3>I'm nine hundred inappropriate jokes away from being a Disney actor, but.

0:12:27.424 --> 0:12:30.104
<v Speaker 1>People still see me that way now.

0:12:30.144 --> 0:12:32.184
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if it's just because we're in Australia

0:12:32.424 --> 0:12:34.984
<v Speaker 3>and all of us had the same kind of access

0:12:35.024 --> 0:12:38.024
<v Speaker 3>to Disney personas maybe I'm just too old.

0:12:38.504 --> 0:12:41.104
<v Speaker 1>But do you agree with this am? Do you see

0:12:41.104 --> 0:12:43.104
<v Speaker 1>her as still a Disney actor or.

0:12:43.064 --> 0:12:46.944
<v Speaker 2>As a post No, I don't see her as a

0:12:46.984 --> 0:12:49.984
<v Speaker 2>Disney actor. And I think what you're saying there is false.

0:12:50.024 --> 0:12:53.024
<v Speaker 2>I think that's something that Disney kids are trained to

0:12:53.144 --> 0:12:55.944
<v Speaker 2>say because the Disney kids before them said it, and

0:12:55.984 --> 0:12:58.464
<v Speaker 2>they just keep saying it and saying it. So every

0:12:58.544 --> 0:13:00.544
<v Speaker 2>time they feel like their career is kind of like

0:13:00.544 --> 0:13:03.864
<v Speaker 2>in a weird lull or like someone's questioning them, it's

0:13:03.864 --> 0:13:05.664
<v Speaker 2>like a safety net for them to be like, I'm

0:13:05.664 --> 0:13:07.504
<v Speaker 2>still trying to get out of that Disney Sace I'm

0:13:07.544 --> 0:13:09.424
<v Speaker 2>still trying to like make a name for myself. And

0:13:09.464 --> 0:13:11.584
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if that's me talking from an older

0:13:11.624 --> 0:13:13.784
<v Speaker 2>person's perspective because I was actually too old to see

0:13:13.784 --> 0:13:16.424
<v Speaker 2>her on Disney Channel. Maybe like the younger generation do

0:13:16.544 --> 0:13:18.704
<v Speaker 2>know her as a Disney star. I know her from

0:13:18.744 --> 0:13:20.744
<v Speaker 2>The Kissing Boot That's the first time I saw her,

0:13:20.864 --> 0:13:23.744
<v Speaker 2>which was a whole netflixed movie. Yeah, yeah, and I

0:13:23.824 --> 0:13:26.784
<v Speaker 2>just thought she was like really quirky, really cute, really small.

0:13:26.944 --> 0:13:29.424
<v Speaker 2>She was also in this movie called Tall Girl, which

0:13:29.424 --> 0:13:30.424
<v Speaker 2>she was like the tiny.

0:13:30.664 --> 0:13:34.344
<v Speaker 3>God she was in Tall Girls. I've never seen the

0:13:34.344 --> 0:13:37.064
<v Speaker 3>actual film. I agree with you. I think maybe it

0:13:37.144 --> 0:13:40.664
<v Speaker 3>is an Australia thing on age thing, But if anything,

0:13:40.704 --> 0:13:42.864
<v Speaker 3>I think she's just known for being so little.

0:13:42.944 --> 0:13:45.904
<v Speaker 2>So little and cute and a little like beautiful bombshell.

0:13:46.064 --> 0:13:46.624
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:13:46.744 --> 0:13:48.184
<v Speaker 2>I might got in trouble for saying this, but I

0:13:48.184 --> 0:13:51.264
<v Speaker 2>think putting everything on like people knowing me as a

0:13:51.264 --> 0:13:52.664
<v Speaker 2>Disney actor is a bit of cop out.

0:13:52.864 --> 0:13:55.144
<v Speaker 3>Yeah maybe, and Alvisoly, if we look at like a

0:13:55.144 --> 0:13:57.864
<v Speaker 3>lot of the other artists that have tried to break

0:13:57.904 --> 0:14:01.224
<v Speaker 3>free from that, even Jojo Siwa, maybe it's an excuse

0:14:01.344 --> 0:14:05.624
<v Speaker 3>for them going very quickly, very overtly into the kind

0:14:05.624 --> 0:14:09.104
<v Speaker 3>of sexual side. Yeah, I don't know, because there's a

0:14:09.144 --> 0:14:11.744
<v Speaker 3>big difference between the year old actor and a seventeen

0:14:11.784 --> 0:14:14.264
<v Speaker 3>year old pop star. I'm you're a person and a

0:14:14.344 --> 0:14:17.424
<v Speaker 3>seventeen year old person. So I think maybe there doesn't

0:14:17.424 --> 0:14:19.744
<v Speaker 3>need to be an excuse because people should just understand

0:14:19.864 --> 0:14:23.144
<v Speaker 3>that now and you think, oh, she's saying the A word,

0:14:23.144 --> 0:14:24.664
<v Speaker 3>and then I'm like, oh, she's in her mid third.

0:14:24.704 --> 0:14:28.264
<v Speaker 1>It's like she's allowed. Maybe we just need to be

0:14:28.384 --> 0:14:29.584
<v Speaker 1>like that've grown up.

0:14:29.704 --> 0:14:32.024
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, they're growing up, Miley.

0:14:31.904 --> 0:14:35.824
<v Speaker 1>Like that is that whole like smoking weed, hump and stuff.

0:14:36.544 --> 0:14:36.824
<v Speaker 3>You know.

0:14:37.504 --> 0:14:40.544
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I one hundred percent agree like Britney Spears Miley,

0:14:40.624 --> 0:14:43.064
<v Speaker 2>I think they definitely went through the whole, like trying

0:14:43.104 --> 0:14:46.264
<v Speaker 2>to escape the Disney branding, and I think because of them,

0:14:46.304 --> 0:14:50.144
<v Speaker 2>we become more forgiving of the next generation who were

0:14:50.184 --> 0:14:54.744
<v Speaker 2>Disney stars. But I don't think Sabrina Carpenter really had

0:14:54.784 --> 0:14:59.144
<v Speaker 2>that issue, and I don't think she should blame people

0:14:59.344 --> 0:15:01.624
<v Speaker 2>seeing her as a Disney actor on like where her

0:15:01.624 --> 0:15:02.344
<v Speaker 2>career is now.

0:15:03.424 --> 0:15:05.904
<v Speaker 3>Let's be honest, if you look at her discography, she's

0:15:05.984 --> 0:15:08.584
<v Speaker 3>made a lot of music. She's not like one album

0:15:08.704 --> 0:15:10.264
<v Speaker 3>d but I think she needs to maybe give her

0:15:10.344 --> 0:15:12.344
<v Speaker 3>suff a bit more credit, if anything, and maybe give

0:15:12.344 --> 0:15:13.504
<v Speaker 3>audience is a bit more credit.

0:15:13.784 --> 0:15:18.624
<v Speaker 1>Especially younger generations now, like they're just more forgiving, they're

0:15:18.624 --> 0:15:20.344
<v Speaker 1>more aware of the world.

0:15:20.984 --> 0:15:23.584
<v Speaker 3>We're more forgiving in women being sexualized, I mean, not

0:15:23.624 --> 0:15:26.944
<v Speaker 3>as much as we should. Yeah, she does talk about

0:15:26.984 --> 0:15:29.544
<v Speaker 3>it a lot, this whole like Disney style, I'm trying

0:15:29.544 --> 0:15:31.384
<v Speaker 3>to get out of it. I think now it's time

0:15:31.424 --> 0:15:34.784
<v Speaker 3>to just embrace the new her and where her career

0:15:34.824 --> 0:15:36.584
<v Speaker 3>is at at the moment and just kind of move

0:15:36.664 --> 0:15:38.824
<v Speaker 3>on from it. But like you said, that's such a

0:15:38.824 --> 0:15:40.784
<v Speaker 3>great point. She's taking cues off the people that have

0:15:40.824 --> 0:15:42.744
<v Speaker 3>gone before. But yeah, she's like worked.

0:15:42.544 --> 0:15:44.824
<v Speaker 1>Really hard to re establish herself, like she too with

0:15:44.904 --> 0:15:45.824
<v Speaker 1>f Taylor Swift.

0:15:45.904 --> 0:15:50.264
<v Speaker 2>For goodness sakes, Like speaking of Taylor Swift, she did

0:15:50.304 --> 0:15:52.744
<v Speaker 2>talk about her and talking about taking cues. I think

0:15:52.784 --> 0:15:54.264
<v Speaker 2>she takes a lot of cues from Taylor.

0:15:54.904 --> 0:16:00.984
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely, And I think especially when we imagine I don't

0:16:00.984 --> 0:16:03.184
<v Speaker 3>want to use the word contrived because it's not contrived.

0:16:03.664 --> 0:16:06.184
<v Speaker 1>Maybe this little bit, but there are teams of people

0:16:06.304 --> 0:16:09.864
<v Speaker 1>around the likes of Sabrina Carpenter and Taylor Swift.

0:16:10.464 --> 0:16:14.304
<v Speaker 3>Everything is more controlled than we think. So I think

0:16:14.344 --> 0:16:17.104
<v Speaker 3>for this Variety interview, there would have been meetings with

0:16:17.264 --> 0:16:20.704
<v Speaker 3>PR people. There would have been meetings with marketing, with

0:16:20.824 --> 0:16:24.784
<v Speaker 3>the teams to really go over the messaging, the kind

0:16:24.824 --> 0:16:27.264
<v Speaker 3>of responses we're going to be giving, the kind of

0:16:27.264 --> 0:16:29.784
<v Speaker 3>things we want to put out, which is especially important

0:16:29.824 --> 0:16:32.424
<v Speaker 3>when we think about the fact that this interview did

0:16:32.464 --> 0:16:35.384
<v Speaker 3>touch on the Skims campaign that Sabrina did. Now, for

0:16:35.424 --> 0:16:37.824
<v Speaker 3>those who don't know Kim kardashi and tell Us, I

0:16:37.984 --> 0:16:42.304
<v Speaker 3>have got some history. Kim Kardashian owns Skims. Sabrina did

0:16:42.304 --> 0:16:46.344
<v Speaker 3>a Skims campaign while still in Taylor's inner circle. I

0:16:46.384 --> 0:16:50.184
<v Speaker 3>think she just wrapped up the era's support when she

0:16:50.264 --> 0:16:50.584
<v Speaker 3>did it.

0:16:50.584 --> 0:16:53.264
<v Speaker 1>It was very close together. I corrected, it was a lot.

0:16:53.344 --> 0:16:55.424
<v Speaker 2>I have a feeling she was out here in Pellegrino

0:16:55.704 --> 0:16:58.864
<v Speaker 2>in Surrey Hills that all went down.

0:16:59.304 --> 0:17:01.504
<v Speaker 3>Yes, So she has given a quote in this interview.

0:17:01.544 --> 0:17:04.824
<v Speaker 3>She said the post about me having to ask for permission. No,

0:17:05.024 --> 0:17:06.784
<v Speaker 3>she's one of my best best friends and we grabbed

0:17:06.784 --> 0:17:08.504
<v Speaker 3>dinner or text and catch up like you would with

0:17:08.544 --> 0:17:10.864
<v Speaker 3>your best friend, which is a great quote. Makes Taylor

0:17:10.904 --> 0:17:13.424
<v Speaker 3>look good, It makes her look good. It comes out

0:17:13.464 --> 0:17:15.744
<v Speaker 3>of beef when we think about it, like she couldn't

0:17:15.744 --> 0:17:17.784
<v Speaker 3>say no to it? What if it got out that

0:17:17.864 --> 0:17:21.304
<v Speaker 3>she said no, and then Taylor Swift looks bad because

0:17:21.304 --> 0:17:23.704
<v Speaker 3>it's like you're stopping your friend from making money.

0:17:24.344 --> 0:17:26.384
<v Speaker 1>I think, and this thought has just come to me.

0:17:26.584 --> 0:17:29.584
<v Speaker 3>Oh, I think it's genius by Kim Kardashian because if

0:17:29.624 --> 0:17:32.424
<v Speaker 3>Kim Kardashian reached out off with the contract and then

0:17:32.424 --> 0:17:37.304
<v Speaker 3>it was like snubbed by Sabrina, that's a worse look

0:17:37.424 --> 0:17:37.984
<v Speaker 3>for Taylor.

0:17:38.144 --> 0:17:40.704
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's a headline right there. But I also think

0:17:40.704 --> 0:17:45.104
<v Speaker 2>it's genius for Taylor because one hundred percent, like I

0:17:45.144 --> 0:17:47.944
<v Speaker 2>know she said she didn't, but I am certain that

0:17:48.024 --> 0:17:50.824
<v Speaker 2>Sabrina Carpenter would have had to ask Taylor Swift, of course,

0:17:51.024 --> 0:17:52.664
<v Speaker 2>can I do this discussion?

0:17:52.904 --> 0:17:56.704
<v Speaker 3>At the very least, Sabrina's people called Taylor's people and yes,

0:17:56.984 --> 0:17:59.184
<v Speaker 3>this is the thing. How are we going to handle this?

0:17:59.464 --> 0:18:01.864
<v Speaker 3>What's the messaging going to be? And they all would

0:18:01.864 --> 0:18:02.344
<v Speaker 3>have agreed.

0:18:03.384 --> 0:18:05.544
<v Speaker 2>They would have agreed, and Taylor's team would have been like,

0:18:05.904 --> 0:18:07.984
<v Speaker 2>you just have to talk about how great Taylor Swift

0:18:08.064 --> 0:18:10.264
<v Speaker 2>is as a friend, because every time she talks about

0:18:10.384 --> 0:18:13.464
<v Speaker 2>the skims campaign, it's always accompanied with how good Taylor

0:18:13.504 --> 0:18:15.464
<v Speaker 2>Swift is as a friend, and.

0:18:15.544 --> 0:18:18.304
<v Speaker 1>She's the best theories. Her people are the best series.

0:18:18.584 --> 0:18:22.144
<v Speaker 1>She's the best theories. She will turn any situation that happened.

0:18:22.184 --> 0:18:25.144
<v Speaker 3>She could run over an old person and would all

0:18:25.144 --> 0:18:26.024
<v Speaker 3>be thinking at the end of it.

0:18:26.424 --> 0:18:32.664
<v Speaker 1>It's the best little win win. Yes, Sabrina wins, Taylor win.

0:18:32.824 --> 0:18:35.784
<v Speaker 2>It's literally like the perfect case study of how to

0:18:35.864 --> 0:18:38.184
<v Speaker 2>navigate business within a feud YEP.

0:18:38.384 --> 0:18:40.584
<v Speaker 1>Couldn't agree more. Wrap it up, Wrap it up ten

0:18:40.624 --> 0:18:41.904
<v Speaker 1>out of ten. Love done, girls.

0:18:42.944 --> 0:18:44.904
<v Speaker 2>Thank you so much for listening to The Spill today.

0:18:44.944 --> 0:18:47.944
<v Speaker 2>Thank you Ash for joining us. This was so much fun.

0:18:49.904 --> 0:18:52.104
<v Speaker 3>It's always so lovely to be on this podcast and

0:18:52.264 --> 0:18:55.064
<v Speaker 3>just have a chat about the stuff I actually care about.

0:18:56.464 --> 0:18:58.344
<v Speaker 2>Isn't that great We were going to talk about it.

0:18:58.384 --> 0:19:02.384
<v Speaker 2>It's just like girl chat. Yes, we will be putting

0:19:02.544 --> 0:19:05.024
<v Speaker 2>links in our show notes for everything we talked about today.

0:19:05.184 --> 0:19:07.384
<v Speaker 2>And while you're in your podcast app, can you please

0:19:07.424 --> 0:19:09.704
<v Speaker 2>do us a favor click the follow But it not

0:19:09.744 --> 0:19:11.984
<v Speaker 2>a lot of people follow us, but you listen to us,

0:19:12.424 --> 0:19:15.184
<v Speaker 2>Come on, come on us, We know you want to.

0:19:15.424 --> 0:19:18.944
<v Speaker 2>You listen to every episode. We will really appreciate it. Also,

0:19:19.144 --> 0:19:22.144
<v Speaker 2>Ash London. Our bestie is back tomorrow, so you'll hear us.

0:19:22.464 --> 0:19:24.424
<v Speaker 2>You'll hear from us at three pm.

0:19:24.584 --> 0:19:30.024
<v Speaker 1>Bye bye God,