WEBVTT - Our Meghan Pivot & The Ugly SNARF Trap

0:00:10.622 --> 0:00:13.382
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to a MoMA Mia podcast.

0:00:13.822 --> 0:00:17.182
<v Speaker 2>Mamma Mia acknowledges the traditional owners of land and warders

0:00:17.222 --> 0:00:21.782
<v Speaker 2>that this podcast is recorded on I promise that it's

0:00:21.822 --> 0:00:24.382
<v Speaker 2>only like two more days. I'm allowed to reference Meghan

0:00:24.462 --> 0:00:28.542
<v Speaker 2>and everything if her TV show is a legitimate hit.

0:00:29.182 --> 0:00:31.862
<v Speaker 2>Partly it's snaff bit because the people who hater will

0:00:31.862 --> 0:00:35.022
<v Speaker 2>watch it and go back, But the actual show itself

0:00:35.101 --> 0:00:44.702
<v Speaker 2>is so inoffensive and pleasant. Hello and welcome to MoMA

0:00:44.742 --> 0:00:47.422
<v Speaker 2>Mia out loud. It's what women are actually talking about

0:00:47.422 --> 0:00:50.902
<v Speaker 2>on Monday, the tenth of March. I'm Holly Wainwright, I'm.

0:00:50.742 --> 0:00:52.702
<v Speaker 3>Mea Friedman, and I'm Jesse Stevens.

0:00:53.062 --> 0:00:56.502
<v Speaker 2>And on the show today we all got exactly what

0:00:56.582 --> 0:01:00.302
<v Speaker 2>we wanted for International Women's Day, Validation that yes, we

0:01:00.382 --> 0:01:05.542
<v Speaker 2>do do absolutely everything, and some helpful feedback from Rob Catter. Also,

0:01:06.102 --> 0:01:09.262
<v Speaker 2>why after a weekend of digesting with love Meghan and

0:01:09.301 --> 0:01:12.862
<v Speaker 2>some wickles sprinkled with flowers, It's clear that the royal

0:01:12.862 --> 0:01:16.982
<v Speaker 2>family made a big mistake and what is snuff? We

0:01:17.102 --> 0:01:19.062
<v Speaker 2>hate to break it to you, but it's all over

0:01:19.102 --> 0:01:24.062
<v Speaker 2>your phone. But first, I still love you, and I'm like.

0:01:25.662 --> 0:01:28.422
<v Speaker 1>This is exhausting, you know, like we're never getting that

0:01:28.622 --> 0:01:30.862
<v Speaker 1>together like ever No.

0:01:31.982 --> 0:01:32.862
<v Speaker 3>It hps, you missed it.

0:01:32.942 --> 0:01:35.862
<v Speaker 1>Ben Afleck continues to be a lazy boy by dipping

0:01:35.902 --> 0:01:39.022
<v Speaker 1>back into his bag of ex wives called Jennifer. The

0:01:39.102 --> 0:01:43.102
<v Speaker 1>gossip over the weekend was that now his Jennifer Lopez

0:01:43.142 --> 0:01:47.902
<v Speaker 1>divorce has been finalized, he is sniffing around the original

0:01:47.982 --> 0:01:52.062
<v Speaker 1>Jennifer ex wife, Ghana. Page six published photos of Affleck

0:01:52.142 --> 0:01:56.062
<v Speaker 1>and Jennifer Ghana sharing a laugh at their son's paintball party,

0:01:56.182 --> 0:01:58.662
<v Speaker 1>and the next day a source told the outlet that

0:01:58.662 --> 0:02:01.982
<v Speaker 1>Affleck would love another chance. The insider added that the

0:02:02.022 --> 0:02:04.942
<v Speaker 1>actor would definitely be open to giving things another shot

0:02:04.982 --> 0:02:07.422
<v Speaker 1>with Jen if the timing is ever right, but that

0:02:07.542 --> 0:02:10.702
<v Speaker 1>he knows it's just not realistic time in their lives,

0:02:11.302 --> 0:02:12.742
<v Speaker 1>which is a bit of a weird thing to say,

0:02:12.781 --> 0:02:16.982
<v Speaker 1>because Jennifer Ghana has been dating a businessman called John Miller.

0:02:17.022 --> 0:02:21.262
<v Speaker 1>He's like the heir to a big Hamburger franchise. She's

0:02:21.302 --> 0:02:24.622
<v Speaker 1>been dating him since twenty eighteen, a little bit on

0:02:24.702 --> 0:02:27.342
<v Speaker 1>and off, but they're currently on. My question is.

0:02:27.942 --> 0:02:30.862
<v Speaker 4>Why you missed the part about the body language expert

0:02:30.902 --> 0:02:33.262
<v Speaker 4>who had some things to say about how when men

0:02:33.302 --> 0:02:36.422
<v Speaker 4>and women hetero men and women usually hug They keep

0:02:36.462 --> 0:02:40.501
<v Speaker 4>their pelviss apart to indicate space and not a romantic investment.

0:02:40.862 --> 0:02:43.782
<v Speaker 4>But their pelvis is rubbed, which is.

0:02:44.302 --> 0:02:48.221
<v Speaker 2>But that's because they have rubbed before exactly, and so

0:02:48.262 --> 0:02:50.302
<v Speaker 2>they have muscle memory of rubbing.

0:02:50.702 --> 0:02:50.822
<v Speaker 1>Well.

0:02:50.942 --> 0:02:53.622
<v Speaker 2>I think that Jennifer Ghana is way too smart to

0:02:53.702 --> 0:02:54.902
<v Speaker 2>go anywhere in that.

0:02:55.181 --> 0:02:57.862
<v Speaker 4>Ever, Again, I agree with you one hundred percent, but

0:02:57.982 --> 0:03:00.742
<v Speaker 4>it reminded me of a certain type of man and

0:03:00.822 --> 0:03:05.942
<v Speaker 4>perhaps woman who exclusively only dates the same people. Again,

0:03:06.062 --> 0:03:10.062
<v Speaker 4>I think because they're incapable of emotionally investing in a

0:03:10.222 --> 0:03:12.462
<v Speaker 4>new person and learning about who they are. There's an

0:03:12.542 --> 0:03:15.822
<v Speaker 4>ease to kind of fitting in two year old pair

0:03:15.862 --> 0:03:18.302
<v Speaker 4>of jeans rather than having to go out and try

0:03:18.302 --> 0:03:22.702
<v Speaker 4>on a new pair underpants. Yeah, and I have experienced this.

0:03:22.862 --> 0:03:26.341
<v Speaker 4>I had partners in my twenties who we would break

0:03:26.422 --> 0:03:28.942
<v Speaker 4>up and then they'd come back and I'd go, I

0:03:29.062 --> 0:03:33.942
<v Speaker 4>knew it, I'm so desirable irresistible that finally he's back.

0:03:33.982 --> 0:03:36.182
<v Speaker 4>But he was just back because he didn't want to

0:03:36.182 --> 0:03:39.102
<v Speaker 4>bother getting to know a new one, and I was easy.

0:03:39.342 --> 0:03:41.742
<v Speaker 1>I think there are other Jennifers that Ben could move

0:03:41.782 --> 0:03:46.622
<v Speaker 1>on to that he hasn't pollinated. Before, such as Jennifer Aniston.

0:03:47.062 --> 0:03:50.542
<v Speaker 2>That would be me. That would be Imagine how excited

0:03:50.582 --> 0:03:51.702
<v Speaker 2>I would be if that happened.

0:03:52.262 --> 0:03:54.862
<v Speaker 1>We could gossip Jennie that one. Jennifer love Hewitt is

0:03:54.902 --> 0:03:59.382
<v Speaker 1>an option. Yeah, I think she's married, but anyway, and

0:03:59.422 --> 0:04:03.502
<v Speaker 1>also my request would be Jennifer Coolidge, Oh, that would

0:04:03.502 --> 0:04:04.062
<v Speaker 1>be awesome.

0:04:04.422 --> 0:04:06.982
<v Speaker 3>Is she single? I believe she is fabulous?

0:04:08.142 --> 0:04:12.462
<v Speaker 4>Friends, Saturday was into National Women's Day. How did you celebrate, Holleen?

0:04:12.462 --> 0:04:13.782
<v Speaker 4>What did you do on this Saturday?

0:04:14.942 --> 0:04:19.101
<v Speaker 2>Well, gosh, I was alone with my children. Brent's been away,

0:04:19.541 --> 0:04:22.782
<v Speaker 2>so I did a lot of what I believe statistically

0:04:22.902 --> 0:04:26.981
<v Speaker 2>is called women's work. Several loads of washing, cooked at

0:04:27.061 --> 0:04:31.261
<v Speaker 2>least three meals, did some shopping, drove a daughter to work,

0:04:31.782 --> 0:04:35.181
<v Speaker 2>organized a playdate in inverted commons, which just means trying

0:04:35.222 --> 0:04:38.902
<v Speaker 2>to prize young boys off video games. That was it.

0:04:39.022 --> 0:04:42.301
<v Speaker 2>That was my day. Yay me celebration, Maya.

0:04:42.342 --> 0:04:42.742
<v Speaker 3>How about you?

0:04:42.782 --> 0:04:45.101
<v Speaker 1>What did you do? I made myself a cake, Okay,

0:04:45.621 --> 0:04:48.022
<v Speaker 1>not because I remembered that it was International Women's Day,

0:04:48.022 --> 0:04:49.782
<v Speaker 1>just because I felt like a cake and no one

0:04:49.861 --> 0:04:52.181
<v Speaker 1>else would make one. But I made it out of

0:04:52.181 --> 0:04:54.742
<v Speaker 1>a cake mix, so it wasn't very elevated. Okay, I'm

0:04:54.821 --> 0:04:56.741
<v Speaker 1>shamed to say, got my nails done and I had

0:04:56.782 --> 0:04:58.062
<v Speaker 1>a nap. So I had a great day.

0:04:58.981 --> 0:05:03.621
<v Speaker 4>I forgot that it was Saturday. But on Sunday I

0:05:03.702 --> 0:05:06.582
<v Speaker 4>went to hear you speak Maya on a panel which

0:05:07.061 --> 0:05:07.861
<v Speaker 4>was lovely.

0:05:07.981 --> 0:05:09.942
<v Speaker 3>It was great. I'm going to tell you all about

0:05:09.941 --> 0:05:10.222
<v Speaker 3>it later.

0:05:10.222 --> 0:05:13.221
<v Speaker 4>Holly and I went to another panel that my friend

0:05:13.301 --> 0:05:15.182
<v Speaker 4>was on at all about women, and I realized that

0:05:15.222 --> 0:05:18.421
<v Speaker 4>there's this tendency, I think for women on or around

0:05:18.462 --> 0:05:22.741
<v Speaker 4>International Women's Day to spend a decent amount of money

0:05:22.782 --> 0:05:25.061
<v Speaker 4>to go and hear other women speak about things they

0:05:25.101 --> 0:05:28.021
<v Speaker 4>agree with and applaud, while men.

0:05:28.022 --> 0:05:30.941
<v Speaker 3>Just get to sit at home in their pajamas or eat.

0:05:30.821 --> 0:05:32.101
<v Speaker 1>Lunch and money.

0:05:32.262 --> 0:05:34.662
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I had a full I had quite a full

0:05:34.741 --> 0:05:38.462
<v Speaker 4>Sunday due to International Women's Day commitments, and no one

0:05:39.262 --> 0:05:39.981
<v Speaker 4>made me a cake.

0:05:40.741 --> 0:05:41.301
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry.

0:05:41.462 --> 0:05:42.581
<v Speaker 3>Is there any of your cake left?

0:05:42.702 --> 0:05:42.902
<v Speaker 5>Yep?

0:05:43.101 --> 0:05:43.661
<v Speaker 3>Okay, great.

0:05:44.342 --> 0:05:47.662
<v Speaker 4>I saw some headlines which I really wanted to discuss

0:05:47.702 --> 0:05:50.821
<v Speaker 4>with you both. So when the clock ticked over to

0:05:50.902 --> 0:05:53.301
<v Speaker 4>March eight, we were all restless.

0:05:53.342 --> 0:05:53.941
<v Speaker 3>I know we were.

0:05:54.782 --> 0:05:57.301
<v Speaker 4>We were impatient because we needed to know what Robbie Catter,

0:05:57.621 --> 0:06:00.181
<v Speaker 4>the leader of Kata's Australian Party and MP son of

0:06:00.181 --> 0:06:03.182
<v Speaker 4>Bobby Catter, had to say about this momentous occasion.

0:06:04.381 --> 0:06:05.662
<v Speaker 3>He delivered he always does.

0:06:06.501 --> 0:06:09.501
<v Speaker 4>In a Facebook post, Katter shared his thoughts on Internet

0:06:09.782 --> 0:06:13.462
<v Speaker 4>Women's Day, which he describes as pushing a dangerous agenda

0:06:13.541 --> 0:06:17.301
<v Speaker 4>by turning women into victims and demonizing men. He wrote

0:06:17.301 --> 0:06:20.222
<v Speaker 4>that the official theme this year was Accelerate Action, and

0:06:20.262 --> 0:06:21.902
<v Speaker 4>I'm going to stop him there, because that's not the thing.

0:06:23.582 --> 0:06:27.581
<v Speaker 4>It's a long story, but this random organization purchased the

0:06:27.621 --> 0:06:30.301
<v Speaker 4>domain name for International Women's Day and puts out their

0:06:30.342 --> 0:06:33.421
<v Speaker 4>own theme every year creates what I'm going to call

0:06:33.501 --> 0:06:37.822
<v Speaker 4>corporate confusion. We go by the UN Australia theme, which

0:06:37.941 --> 0:06:39.421
<v Speaker 4>was actually March Forward.

0:06:39.582 --> 0:06:42.101
<v Speaker 3>Anyway, he got the theme wrong, But point.

0:06:41.941 --> 0:06:45.061
<v Speaker 2>Is we're much former than accelerate. The kind of similar

0:06:45.262 --> 0:06:47.061
<v Speaker 2>yeah like ballpark?

0:06:49.821 --> 0:06:53.342
<v Speaker 3>Okay, well, reach for the Stars that's next to go

0:06:53.501 --> 0:06:55.782
<v Speaker 3>You go girl.

0:06:56.142 --> 0:06:58.662
<v Speaker 4>According to Katta, he wrote that women are not oppressed.

0:06:58.821 --> 0:07:01.662
<v Speaker 4>He said, my success has been built on the quiet,

0:07:01.821 --> 0:07:05.021
<v Speaker 4>unwavering strength of the women behind me.

0:07:05.421 --> 0:07:08.941
<v Speaker 1>Does that do sound a little bit oppressive? Being behind

0:07:08.981 --> 0:07:11.862
<v Speaker 1>and underneath? I'm mister Carter.

0:07:12.062 --> 0:07:15.022
<v Speaker 4>When men talk about the women behind them, My mother

0:07:15.222 --> 0:07:18.941
<v Speaker 4>wife and daughters. They're not looking for praise, according to him,

0:07:19.381 --> 0:07:22.062
<v Speaker 4>just getting on with the hard work, supporting and pushing boundaries.

0:07:22.062 --> 0:07:23.942
<v Speaker 4>The women in my life don't get caught up in

0:07:23.982 --> 0:07:26.262
<v Speaker 4>the victimhood off and pushed on this day. They live

0:07:26.342 --> 0:07:29.622
<v Speaker 4>their strength every day, quietly and powerfully with that's convenient

0:07:29.702 --> 0:07:29.941
<v Speaker 4>for him.

0:07:30.022 --> 0:07:32.141
<v Speaker 3>Credit, Yeah, I love that.

0:07:32.782 --> 0:07:35.381
<v Speaker 4>It's like when your partner says like, oh, I love

0:07:35.381 --> 0:07:37.461
<v Speaker 4>how we don't do birthday presents, and it's like, I

0:07:37.462 --> 0:07:40.261
<v Speaker 4>actually wanted a birthday. To be clear, I think his

0:07:40.381 --> 0:07:42.382
<v Speaker 4>wife and daughters would have liked.

0:07:42.262 --> 0:07:43.862
<v Speaker 2>To I love how we don't get caught up in

0:07:43.902 --> 0:07:45.582
<v Speaker 2>the patriarchy and stuff.

0:07:45.062 --> 0:07:49.302
<v Speaker 4>With this house exactly, and they're like, actually, we bitch

0:07:49.302 --> 0:07:51.982
<v Speaker 4>about your time. He had a few things to say

0:07:51.982 --> 0:07:54.821
<v Speaker 4>about toxic masculinity, and I agree with the sentiment that

0:07:54.862 --> 0:07:57.182
<v Speaker 4>women hold value whether they're in the workplace, where they're

0:07:57.182 --> 0:08:01.381
<v Speaker 4>at home, and that demonizing all forms of masculinity isn't helpful.

0:08:01.862 --> 0:08:05.382
<v Speaker 4>But sir, five minutes ago, you were attempting to amend

0:08:05.462 --> 0:08:09.302
<v Speaker 4>Queensland abortion laws, which the Royal Australian and New Zealand

0:08:09.302 --> 0:08:11.941
<v Speaker 4>College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists had to come out and

0:08:11.982 --> 0:08:14.822
<v Speaker 4>oppose because they said it would cause emotional trauma for

0:08:14.902 --> 0:08:16.302
<v Speaker 4>patients and healthcare providers.

0:08:16.742 --> 0:08:18.701
<v Speaker 1>So he ordered to bound abortion in Queensland.

0:08:18.742 --> 0:08:22.382
<v Speaker 4>He wanted to make some amendments that the expert said,

0:08:22.742 --> 0:08:25.142
<v Speaker 4>what you're going to do is traumatize women who have

0:08:25.422 --> 0:08:28.101
<v Speaker 4>babies that are like they're incompatible with life.

0:08:28.182 --> 0:08:29.542
<v Speaker 3>So he just was like, I want to make your

0:08:29.582 --> 0:08:30.102
<v Speaker 3>life harder.

0:08:30.622 --> 0:08:33.102
<v Speaker 2>He'd like it on the agenda. He would definitely like

0:08:33.142 --> 0:08:33.862
<v Speaker 2>it on the agenda.

0:08:34.022 --> 0:08:37.422
<v Speaker 4>MEA, were you disappointed that Kata didn't just bake you

0:08:37.462 --> 0:08:39.982
<v Speaker 4>a cake and give us an encouraging tap on the head.

0:08:40.262 --> 0:08:42.822
<v Speaker 1>No, I think it's always a good day to hear

0:08:43.542 --> 0:08:48.142
<v Speaker 1>from men like Bob Katter about what feminism should be. Sorry,

0:08:48.302 --> 0:08:52.742
<v Speaker 1>Robbie Catter, Bobby Robbie Robbie is Bob Okay, son of

0:08:52.782 --> 0:08:54.582
<v Speaker 1>the big Hat. I assume he also wears a.

0:08:54.582 --> 0:08:56.582
<v Speaker 2>Big cat does slightly smaller hat.

0:08:56.742 --> 0:08:59.102
<v Speaker 1>And because he has three daughters and a wife, he's

0:08:59.102 --> 0:09:03.062
<v Speaker 1>eminently qualified to speak. And I think International Women's Day

0:09:03.102 --> 0:09:05.902
<v Speaker 1>is the day that he should speak, because we need

0:09:05.942 --> 0:09:08.742
<v Speaker 1>to hear more from men like him who have daughters.

0:09:09.102 --> 0:09:11.382
<v Speaker 1>He also so behind them.

0:09:12.742 --> 0:09:13.462
<v Speaker 3>You can't see them.

0:09:13.502 --> 0:09:16.462
<v Speaker 4>They hit an He didn't say as well that International

0:09:16.502 --> 0:09:20.142
<v Speaker 4>Women's Day started off as a day to really celebrate

0:09:20.182 --> 0:09:22.942
<v Speaker 4>the strength of women. That's not what it started off as.

0:09:22.982 --> 0:09:25.382
<v Speaker 4>It's a day of protest. So he got that fact

0:09:25.422 --> 0:09:26.062
<v Speaker 4>wrong too.

0:09:25.942 --> 0:09:27.382
<v Speaker 1>About things like the gender pay gap.

0:09:27.702 --> 0:09:30.182
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Holly, what did you make of our good friend Robbie.

0:09:30.382 --> 0:09:32.942
<v Speaker 2>Well, look, he is exhibiting the kind of confidence in

0:09:33.022 --> 0:09:36.862
<v Speaker 2>hubris that is not surprising and is apparently statistically typical

0:09:36.982 --> 0:09:38.982
<v Speaker 2>of the chaps at the moment, and I, rather than

0:09:39.022 --> 0:09:41.382
<v Speaker 2>criticize them for it, I think we should all take

0:09:41.422 --> 0:09:43.942
<v Speaker 2>a little dose of this. There was some statistics came

0:09:43.982 --> 0:09:46.462
<v Speaker 2>out last week and not that many people reported on

0:09:46.502 --> 0:09:52.182
<v Speaker 2>them because they were so expected. But every few years

0:09:52.542 --> 0:09:55.582
<v Speaker 2>this big report comes out. It's called the Household Income

0:09:55.622 --> 0:09:58.822
<v Speaker 2>and Labor Dynamics in Australia Report Hilda, which is a

0:09:58.942 --> 0:10:02.102
<v Speaker 2>very good name, a very good female name, and basically

0:10:02.182 --> 0:10:04.022
<v Speaker 2>it reports on the state of men and women in

0:10:04.022 --> 0:10:06.422
<v Speaker 2>lots of different areas of equality. And what it said

0:10:06.582 --> 0:10:10.622
<v Speaker 2>is that Australian men are not doing any more housework,

0:10:10.742 --> 0:10:14.782
<v Speaker 2>domestic chores or caregiving tasks. Actually, although that's changed a

0:10:14.782 --> 0:10:18.262
<v Speaker 2>little bit then they were twenty years ago, right, So

0:10:18.422 --> 0:10:23.302
<v Speaker 2>that shows a certain amount of stubbornness and commitment on

0:10:23.382 --> 0:10:26.302
<v Speaker 2>their part, I think to refusing to move. But what's

0:10:26.342 --> 0:10:29.582
<v Speaker 2>particularly charming is that most of them, however, think they're

0:10:29.582 --> 0:10:32.822
<v Speaker 2>doing a fair share. So math isn't really my strong suit.

0:10:33.222 --> 0:10:38.062
<v Speaker 2>But apparently women do at least twenty percent more household work.

0:10:38.102 --> 0:10:41.142
<v Speaker 2>They always have they continue to do so. But fifty

0:10:41.142 --> 0:10:44.262
<v Speaker 2>eight percent of men believe they do very much their

0:10:44.262 --> 0:10:47.662
<v Speaker 2>fair share, which reminded me of the way that men

0:10:47.742 --> 0:10:51.422
<v Speaker 2>behave And this is very stereotypical. Let's say heterosexual men

0:10:51.462 --> 0:10:55.942
<v Speaker 2>maybe in a traditional partnership, maybe when they are suddenly

0:10:56.022 --> 0:10:58.622
<v Speaker 2>required to do some like say you've got mates coming

0:10:58.702 --> 0:11:02.862
<v Speaker 2>round or people coming to stay, and they're like, i'll help,

0:11:03.542 --> 0:11:06.222
<v Speaker 2>and then they empty the fish tank.

0:11:06.302 --> 0:11:10.622
<v Speaker 4>Perhaps, yes, so I was thinking about these. Sometimes they're

0:11:10.662 --> 0:11:13.142
<v Speaker 4>put to work, like I see in my parents' dynamic.

0:11:13.822 --> 0:11:17.742
<v Speaker 4>My mum will say we're hosting family Christmas this week,

0:11:18.302 --> 0:11:20.782
<v Speaker 4>I need you to do some jobs, and dads like say,

0:11:20.822 --> 0:11:23.422
<v Speaker 4>no more, I'm on it. I'm a helpful guy. Whipp

0:11:23.422 --> 0:11:26.702
<v Speaker 4>a snipper out. Don't need the whipper snipper. Actually, we

0:11:26.742 --> 0:11:28.862
<v Speaker 4>need you to wipe the bench, That is the case.

0:11:28.902 --> 0:11:32.742
<v Speaker 4>And look, Luca is in terms of domestic labor. Like,

0:11:33.302 --> 0:11:36.342
<v Speaker 4>you know, he is the exception. I accept the stats,

0:11:36.382 --> 0:11:38.742
<v Speaker 4>but he does do a lot. But there is something

0:11:38.782 --> 0:11:42.742
<v Speaker 4>where men are wired differently when it comes to hosting, right,

0:11:43.262 --> 0:11:45.702
<v Speaker 4>Like when people are coming over, I think that I

0:11:45.782 --> 0:11:49.342
<v Speaker 4>instinctively know I should vacuum, the house should smell good.

0:11:49.422 --> 0:11:51.982
<v Speaker 4>Like there are just kind of a hierarchy of things.

0:11:52.582 --> 0:11:55.302
<v Speaker 4>That's when Luca will be like, I think it's time

0:11:55.302 --> 0:11:56.142
<v Speaker 4>to wage war on.

0:11:56.102 --> 0:11:58.742
<v Speaker 3>The ants, and it's like no, no, no, or reoil

0:11:58.782 --> 0:11:59.382
<v Speaker 3>the deck.

0:11:59.262 --> 0:12:01.502
<v Speaker 4>Reoil the deck. Oh the wood is rotting. I don't

0:12:01.542 --> 0:12:04.622
<v Speaker 4>give a shit, or like slug bait, I'm going to

0:12:04.702 --> 0:12:06.022
<v Speaker 4>clean the dog's water bowl.

0:12:06.222 --> 0:12:09.062
<v Speaker 3>No, they are not top one hundred tasks of what

0:12:09.062 --> 0:12:11.062
<v Speaker 3>we need to do right now. Yeah, I don't know.

0:12:11.502 --> 0:12:13.942
<v Speaker 1>I can't really get on board with this because I

0:12:14.062 --> 0:12:14.662
<v Speaker 1>do nothing.

0:12:15.222 --> 0:12:16.462
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you're really the exception.

0:12:16.742 --> 0:12:18.942
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, what do you mean when you say you do nothing?

0:12:18.982 --> 0:12:21.502
<v Speaker 2>You mean ever? Or when people are coming round.

0:12:21.622 --> 0:12:24.742
<v Speaker 4>People are coming round? Both you've held, you've held Christmas before?

0:12:25.542 --> 0:12:27.542
<v Speaker 4>What do you do you spill something in preparation?

0:12:27.902 --> 0:12:30.381
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, no, I'll go and buy things. I'll go and

0:12:30.422 --> 0:12:32.622
<v Speaker 1>buy vessels to put things in. Like I'll go and

0:12:32.622 --> 0:12:35.262
<v Speaker 1>buy bins and Jason will be like, why are you

0:12:35.302 --> 0:12:38.142
<v Speaker 1>buying bins? I'm like, because I feel like we need them.

0:12:38.462 --> 0:12:39.862
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, right, that's your contribution.

0:12:39.942 --> 0:12:43.141
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think men often will. Again we're talking in

0:12:43.222 --> 0:12:47.302
<v Speaker 1>such stereotypes, but maybe look at the exterior of the house.

0:12:47.942 --> 0:12:51.382
<v Speaker 3>Perhaps they go outside, they wage war with the possums.

0:12:51.662 --> 0:12:53.782
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I just think that there are some people who

0:12:53.782 --> 0:12:55.862
<v Speaker 1>are good entertainers, good hostesses I know we're going to

0:12:55.902 --> 0:12:59.102
<v Speaker 1>be talking about Megan in a minute, and some who aren't,

0:12:59.342 --> 0:13:02.582
<v Speaker 1>some who really think about the moments that their guests

0:13:02.662 --> 0:13:03.622
<v Speaker 1>need to experience.

0:13:04.182 --> 0:13:06.462
<v Speaker 2>I accept that to a point. But even if you

0:13:06.542 --> 0:13:10.102
<v Speaker 2>don't like hosting, there is a certain amount of hosting

0:13:10.142 --> 0:13:12.742
<v Speaker 2>that in every life must fall, right, Like, you're not

0:13:12.862 --> 0:13:16.102
<v Speaker 2>going to get away with never ever having family members

0:13:16.182 --> 0:13:18.982
<v Speaker 2>or people coming round. So I totally agree with you.

0:13:19.062 --> 0:13:20.622
<v Speaker 2>Some people love it and it's a way of them

0:13:20.622 --> 0:13:23.982
<v Speaker 2>expressing their love, and that's great, But there's also just

0:13:23.982 --> 0:13:27.222
<v Speaker 2>a certain amount of grudge hosting that has to oh yeah,

0:13:27.262 --> 0:13:31.022
<v Speaker 2>and so when that occurs, who does it? That's kind

0:13:31.062 --> 0:13:32.222
<v Speaker 2>of what this is about, right.

0:13:32.462 --> 0:13:35.982
<v Speaker 1>That's another argument that I have with my husband a lot,

0:13:36.102 --> 0:13:39.222
<v Speaker 1>because I feel that if they're close enough to come

0:13:39.302 --> 0:13:41.862
<v Speaker 1>to your house. You shouldn't really have to do anything.

0:13:42.302 --> 0:13:44.702
<v Speaker 1>I have people in and out of my house all

0:13:44.702 --> 0:13:46.462
<v Speaker 1>the time, and I'm like, do I need to clean up?

0:13:46.502 --> 0:13:49.022
<v Speaker 2>Not really in terms of being the change you need

0:13:49.102 --> 0:13:52.261
<v Speaker 2>to see in the world, we should normalize you come

0:13:52.302 --> 0:13:54.142
<v Speaker 2>to my house and it looks like it does on

0:13:54.182 --> 0:13:57.502
<v Speaker 2>a random Tuesday night. But we can't because we've so

0:13:57.742 --> 0:13:59.742
<v Speaker 2>internalized the idea.

0:13:59.582 --> 0:14:02.662
<v Speaker 4>Yes and maya your baseline of your house. And maybe

0:14:02.662 --> 0:14:05.262
<v Speaker 4>it's because your kids are older and stuff is pretty good,

0:14:05.342 --> 0:14:07.902
<v Speaker 4>right my mum growing up two sets of twins in

0:14:07.942 --> 0:14:11.462
<v Speaker 4>two and a half years house. You could see the

0:14:11.462 --> 0:14:13.502
<v Speaker 4>floor right, really really messy, and people are going to

0:14:13.582 --> 0:14:16.182
<v Speaker 4>drop in, and I remember my mum has spoken about

0:14:16.182 --> 0:14:19.302
<v Speaker 4>this moment and my mum is difficult to offend. But

0:14:19.622 --> 0:14:21.302
<v Speaker 4>I think someone dropped in. You know, people used to

0:14:21.302 --> 0:14:24.662
<v Speaker 4>do that, They used to drop in. And this friend

0:14:24.742 --> 0:14:26.742
<v Speaker 4>went and whispered to other friends about the state of

0:14:26.742 --> 0:14:28.982
<v Speaker 4>the house and how horrified she Oh my god. And

0:14:29.262 --> 0:14:31.782
<v Speaker 4>that will always fall on women. That is never like,

0:14:31.862 --> 0:14:36.102
<v Speaker 4>can you believe how Tony manages that house well?

0:14:36.102 --> 0:14:37.862
<v Speaker 1>Because men aren't judged by.

0:14:37.982 --> 0:14:41.142
<v Speaker 4>No that as a and as there were some great

0:14:41.222 --> 0:14:44.462
<v Speaker 4>videos going around over the weekend to mark International Women's Day,

0:14:44.502 --> 0:14:46.782
<v Speaker 4>and I just want to play you this clip by

0:14:46.822 --> 0:14:49.382
<v Speaker 4>one of my favorite comedians. Her name is Sarah Pasco,

0:14:49.542 --> 0:14:51.822
<v Speaker 4>and here's what she said about the gender divide.

0:14:52.022 --> 0:14:53.502
<v Speaker 3>Equality is a lie.

0:14:54.262 --> 0:14:58.342
<v Speaker 6>All there is is oh women, go on, have jobs,

0:14:58.942 --> 0:15:00.982
<v Speaker 6>go on, have careers if you want one, go on.

0:15:01.142 --> 0:15:02.742
<v Speaker 6>Be proud of yourself as long as when you come

0:15:02.742 --> 0:15:04.942
<v Speaker 6>home you very quickly do all of the housework like

0:15:05.022 --> 0:15:08.862
<v Speaker 6>it's your hobby. And if you're a straight man, now

0:15:08.982 --> 0:15:12.782
<v Speaker 6>shout in at in your head being no. Actually, I

0:15:12.782 --> 0:15:16.182
<v Speaker 6>put a ladder back in the shed on Saturday. I

0:15:16.302 --> 0:15:22.222
<v Speaker 6>cleaned the bath when she was crying on her birthday.

0:15:22.462 --> 0:15:24.862
<v Speaker 3>Thank you, thank.

0:15:24.662 --> 0:15:27.822
<v Speaker 6>You, you're one of the good ones. I'm actually not

0:15:27.862 --> 0:15:30.942
<v Speaker 6>attacking you. I'm not saying that men don't do anything

0:15:31.262 --> 0:15:33.422
<v Speaker 6>you do, but it's just that there is too much

0:15:33.502 --> 0:15:36.542
<v Speaker 6>to do and our input isn't parity. And I do

0:15:36.662 --> 0:15:40.142
<v Speaker 6>have proof men if they want to, I have so

0:15:40.262 --> 0:15:42.182
<v Speaker 6>much spare time about being dads that they can have

0:15:42.182 --> 0:15:43.502
<v Speaker 6>secret second families.

0:15:46.822 --> 0:15:48.982
<v Speaker 3>Just jump in the car half.

0:15:48.782 --> 0:15:51.382
<v Speaker 6>An hour down the road, another bit of dinner.

0:15:52.862 --> 0:15:53.702
<v Speaker 2>Night kids.

0:15:54.102 --> 0:15:56.702
<v Speaker 6>There is no woman who after twenty four hours of

0:15:56.822 --> 0:16:03.702
<v Speaker 6>drudgery and then I go to Chelmsford and I scrub

0:16:03.822 --> 0:16:04.902
<v Speaker 6>somebody else's kitchen.

0:16:08.142 --> 0:16:10.102
<v Speaker 4>I love that, And I thought that there were that

0:16:10.382 --> 0:16:12.182
<v Speaker 4>you referred to, Holly. There was a great line in

0:16:12.222 --> 0:16:15.582
<v Speaker 4>it that said, the report also shows men are more

0:16:15.622 --> 0:16:18.222
<v Speaker 4>satisfied than women with the division of the unpaid.

0:16:18.622 --> 0:16:21.102
<v Speaker 3>And I'm like, yeah, I bet, I bet they are going.

0:16:21.182 --> 0:16:22.822
<v Speaker 3>I think things are actually fine.

0:16:22.942 --> 0:16:26.982
<v Speaker 2>I've got an extra six hours a week. In a moment,

0:16:27.262 --> 0:16:30.182
<v Speaker 2>has Loved Meghan showed how the royal family made a

0:16:30.222 --> 0:16:37.382
<v Speaker 2>big mistake in letting their gold star princess go. Meg

0:16:37.462 --> 0:16:41.182
<v Speaker 2>Sussex is celebrating today. Her show with Love Meghan is

0:16:41.182 --> 0:16:44.382
<v Speaker 2>in Netflix's top ten worldwide and has officially been greenlit

0:16:44.462 --> 0:16:47.102
<v Speaker 2>for a second season, which has already been filmed. So

0:16:47.182 --> 0:16:49.102
<v Speaker 2>we don't imagine that was very much of a surprise

0:16:49.142 --> 0:16:52.782
<v Speaker 2>to Megs. But anyway, it's good if you like me.

0:16:53.142 --> 0:16:57.022
<v Speaker 2>Spent the weekend watching Meg's perfect manicure doing lovely things

0:16:57.062 --> 0:17:00.222
<v Speaker 2>to Lettice, You've been thinking a lot about this new

0:17:00.342 --> 0:17:03.422
<v Speaker 2>act of Duchess Meghan. She's on the cover of People,

0:17:03.502 --> 0:17:06.422
<v Speaker 2>she's on the Drew Barrymore Show, she's out of hiding,

0:17:06.821 --> 0:17:11.342
<v Speaker 2>and what's on full display her perfect credentials as a princess.

0:17:12.061 --> 0:17:14.701
<v Speaker 2>Now the story goes according to both the royal family

0:17:14.742 --> 0:17:17.061
<v Speaker 2>at the time and Harry in his book, which we

0:17:17.141 --> 0:17:19.262
<v Speaker 2>won't discuss the title of because we all know that

0:17:19.302 --> 0:17:22.701
<v Speaker 2>it's me or what is it Wow that when everything

0:17:22.742 --> 0:17:25.621
<v Speaker 2>went down and Harry and Meghan exited the royal family,

0:17:25.982 --> 0:17:28.461
<v Speaker 2>what the Sussexes wanted at the time and what they

0:17:28.581 --> 0:17:31.421
<v Speaker 2>tried to negotiate to get was a different model of

0:17:31.502 --> 0:17:34.101
<v Speaker 2>royal life, right. They wanted one where maybe they could

0:17:34.141 --> 0:17:37.262
<v Speaker 2>live overseas, be allowed to make their own money, and

0:17:37.341 --> 0:17:40.341
<v Speaker 2>do good for causes that they cared about on their terms.

0:17:40.821 --> 0:17:45.341
<v Speaker 2>And those negotiations famously failed. But actually it's exactly what's

0:17:45.422 --> 0:17:48.341
<v Speaker 2>ended up happening because Harry and Meghan are living their

0:17:48.462 --> 0:17:52.221
<v Speaker 2>royal light life. They live overseas, they make their own money,

0:17:52.462 --> 0:17:55.461
<v Speaker 2>and as last year's tours to Nigeria and Columbia showed,

0:17:55.502 --> 0:17:58.502
<v Speaker 2>as well as the Invictus Games and their Archroal Foundation projects,

0:17:58.782 --> 0:18:02.542
<v Speaker 2>they're doing royal esque charity and ambassadorship roles on their

0:18:02.581 --> 0:18:06.861
<v Speaker 2>own terms. But most of all, Meg proves herself, I

0:18:06.901 --> 0:18:10.901
<v Speaker 2>think through this show to be the perfect princess Mia.

0:18:11.022 --> 0:18:13.782
<v Speaker 2>Do you think that the proper royals are kicking themselves

0:18:13.821 --> 0:18:14.262
<v Speaker 2>this week.

0:18:15.262 --> 0:18:18.661
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I do in a way, although obviously she I

0:18:18.661 --> 0:18:20.941
<v Speaker 1>mean she could have had this show as a royal.

0:18:21.061 --> 0:18:25.661
<v Speaker 1>She really could have, because well, everything that people complain

0:18:25.782 --> 0:18:30.461
<v Speaker 1>about about the show is what makes a royal woman

0:18:30.782 --> 0:18:34.462
<v Speaker 1>good at her job. She looks beautiful, she's very thin,

0:18:34.702 --> 0:18:40.902
<v Speaker 1>she's very perfect. She is utterly inoffensive, bordering on bland.

0:18:41.621 --> 0:18:46.902
<v Speaker 1>She's very careful to be inclusive, to not do anything controversial.

0:18:47.302 --> 0:18:50.142
<v Speaker 1>When she cooks Mexican food, she has a Mexican chef there.

0:18:50.182 --> 0:18:53.621
<v Speaker 1>When she cooks Korean food, she has a Korean chef there.

0:18:54.182 --> 0:18:58.181
<v Speaker 1>There's nothing sort of to grab hold of, and people

0:18:58.422 --> 0:19:01.462
<v Speaker 1>are acting as though that is a flaw, but it's

0:19:01.462 --> 0:19:05.022
<v Speaker 1>actually the feature. It's the feature of It was the

0:19:05.061 --> 0:19:08.942
<v Speaker 1>feature of Instagram influencers in you know, twenty fifteen or so,

0:19:09.101 --> 0:19:12.782
<v Speaker 1>before things became more extreme and they needed to find

0:19:12.821 --> 0:19:16.101
<v Speaker 1>more dramatic ways to get attention. And it was the

0:19:16.182 --> 0:19:18.421
<v Speaker 1>model for the Tig, which was her lifestyle blog that

0:19:18.502 --> 0:19:22.661
<v Speaker 1>she had back then. And it's essentially also what Kate

0:19:23.101 --> 0:19:26.102
<v Speaker 1>Middleton does, Like that's what she has to do as

0:19:26.101 --> 0:19:28.981
<v Speaker 1>a princess. You have to be ornamental, you have to

0:19:29.022 --> 0:19:32.942
<v Speaker 1>be decorative. You have to be kind and supportive and

0:19:32.982 --> 0:19:36.061
<v Speaker 1>caring of other people, or at least perform that, and

0:19:36.101 --> 0:19:37.581
<v Speaker 1>that's exactly what she's doing.

0:19:37.942 --> 0:19:40.061
<v Speaker 2>She's very good at it, and I agree with everything

0:19:40.061 --> 0:19:42.821
<v Speaker 2>you've said, But Kate could never make that show because

0:19:43.101 --> 0:19:45.341
<v Speaker 2>if you think about the criticism that's come for Megan

0:19:45.422 --> 0:19:50.182
<v Speaker 2>about unrelatability, the money, the time, all that stuff. If

0:19:50.222 --> 0:19:52.701
<v Speaker 2>that was a proper Royal, that would also come with

0:19:52.742 --> 0:19:56.502
<v Speaker 2>a side of we're paying for those flowers, We're paying

0:19:56.581 --> 0:19:59.941
<v Speaker 2>for that house. Obviously, the actual literal logistics of that

0:19:59.982 --> 0:20:04.621
<v Speaker 2>are complicated, but that's why royals have to look aspirationally

0:20:04.702 --> 0:20:10.741
<v Speaker 2>wealthy and glamorous, but not ostentatiously glamorous, because that is

0:20:10.782 --> 0:20:13.141
<v Speaker 2>a bit like, well, you're paying for those jewels, you

0:20:13.182 --> 0:20:16.381
<v Speaker 2>know what I mean. So Megan's got the freedom to

0:20:16.462 --> 0:20:18.742
<v Speaker 2>be able to show the lifestyle that she obviously really

0:20:18.821 --> 0:20:21.421
<v Speaker 2>likes and she obviously really wanted and certainly is on

0:20:21.621 --> 0:20:24.861
<v Speaker 2>par with what the Royals are living without that level

0:20:24.861 --> 0:20:28.262
<v Speaker 2>of criticism. But I think it's true. I think that

0:20:28.341 --> 0:20:31.901
<v Speaker 2>she is very skilled at the kind of royal show

0:20:32.101 --> 0:20:36.701
<v Speaker 2>just enough without saying too much, seem relatable, while also

0:20:36.942 --> 0:20:39.861
<v Speaker 2>never messy, say a lot of words without any of

0:20:39.901 --> 0:20:42.022
<v Speaker 2>them really saying any think that's what royals do. You're

0:20:42.061 --> 0:20:45.302
<v Speaker 2>so right, Mia, And it's like, in a way, I

0:20:45.341 --> 0:20:47.902
<v Speaker 2>think she would have been great at it in the family.

0:20:48.341 --> 0:20:55.942
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, but what undermines that royal performance is her biological

0:20:55.982 --> 0:20:58.461
<v Speaker 4>family and she has no control over this. I've done

0:20:58.462 --> 0:21:00.861
<v Speaker 4>a lot of soul searching between I think last week

0:21:01.022 --> 0:21:04.821
<v Speaker 4>and today. This show isn't for me, and that's totally fine.

0:21:04.861 --> 0:21:08.262
<v Speaker 4>But to sit down and create anything is a feat

0:21:08.462 --> 0:21:11.501
<v Speaker 4>and it's brave. And I think whenever Thomas Markle rears

0:21:11.542 --> 0:21:14.382
<v Speaker 4>his head, I go into a position of just feeling

0:21:14.901 --> 0:21:18.901
<v Speaker 4>such empathy for Meghan. And he has come out just

0:21:18.982 --> 0:21:21.661
<v Speaker 4>I think in the last day or so and said

0:21:21.861 --> 0:21:24.902
<v Speaker 4>that his mother would be turning in her grave at

0:21:24.942 --> 0:21:28.421
<v Speaker 4>Meghan's decision to change her name from Markel to Sussex.

0:21:28.462 --> 0:21:29.861
<v Speaker 1>Which is bizar thing to say.

0:21:29.942 --> 0:21:32.502
<v Speaker 4>It's a bizarre thing to say given that most women

0:21:32.702 --> 0:21:35.702
<v Speaker 4>still upon getting married do change their name.

0:21:35.782 --> 0:21:38.821
<v Speaker 1>He's really grasping, He is really graping to stay in

0:21:38.861 --> 0:21:39.462
<v Speaker 1>the conversation.

0:21:39.702 --> 0:21:41.621
<v Speaker 4>And it also made me look at Meghan in a

0:21:41.621 --> 0:21:43.821
<v Speaker 4>different way because I went, no, wonder she doesn't want

0:21:43.821 --> 0:21:45.581
<v Speaker 4>to be known as Meghan Markle like, I wonder if

0:21:45.581 --> 0:21:47.901
<v Speaker 4>there's an element of really wanting to separate herself, not

0:21:47.942 --> 0:21:51.982
<v Speaker 4>only from Thomas but from her brother, who every time

0:21:52.502 --> 0:21:56.782
<v Speaker 4>she takes a breath, they're asked by the male in

0:21:56.982 --> 0:22:00.021
<v Speaker 4>the UK if they'll comment. They both admitted to not

0:22:00.101 --> 0:22:03.422
<v Speaker 4>actually watching any of it, but Thomas Markle was like, well,

0:22:03.422 --> 0:22:05.742
<v Speaker 4>cooking shows are usually spontaneous and blah and.

0:22:06.222 --> 0:22:10.381
<v Speaker 1>Just it's grows how imbittered he is. I also watched

0:22:10.502 --> 0:22:13.021
<v Speaker 1>a lot more of it over the weekend, and our

0:22:13.061 --> 0:22:16.382
<v Speaker 1>own newsletter about how I was a bit sick over

0:22:16.381 --> 0:22:18.341
<v Speaker 1>the weekend and I couldn't really focus on anything, so

0:22:18.341 --> 0:22:20.662
<v Speaker 1>I just wanted that sort of background TV that would

0:22:20.742 --> 0:22:23.101
<v Speaker 1>wash over me. And it really did the trick. It

0:22:23.141 --> 0:22:26.581
<v Speaker 1>was almost quite soothing, and I came away The first

0:22:26.621 --> 0:22:29.501
<v Speaker 1>episode I found quite frustrating because I think we were

0:22:29.502 --> 0:22:32.381
<v Speaker 1>graining it on a curve that is not the same

0:22:32.422 --> 0:22:36.542
<v Speaker 1>as other lifestyle shows or other cooking shows or crafty shows.

0:22:37.302 --> 0:22:39.901
<v Speaker 1>I think we brought all the baggage of our opinions

0:22:39.942 --> 0:22:42.702
<v Speaker 1>about Megan and the money she was paid and everything

0:22:42.702 --> 0:22:46.022
<v Speaker 1>that's happened. But when I just kind of watched more

0:22:46.061 --> 0:22:50.061
<v Speaker 1>of it, it made me feel sorry for her in

0:22:50.101 --> 0:22:53.782
<v Speaker 1>the sense that she felt very timid, unsure of herself,

0:22:53.861 --> 0:22:58.782
<v Speaker 1>really needing validation and praise for everybody. All the people

0:22:58.821 --> 0:23:00.422
<v Speaker 1>that were in her house didn't seem to know her

0:23:00.581 --> 0:23:02.182
<v Speaker 1>very well or at all. Some of them had never

0:23:02.222 --> 0:23:05.302
<v Speaker 1>met her before, and she really needed their approval, and

0:23:05.341 --> 0:23:08.141
<v Speaker 1>she really needed them to say things like, you've always

0:23:08.182 --> 0:23:10.902
<v Speaker 1>been the hostess with the most and you've always nurtured

0:23:10.901 --> 0:23:13.981
<v Speaker 1>with food, and food is really a love language. It

0:23:14.061 --> 0:23:17.302
<v Speaker 1>was very saying the quiet part out loud. She was

0:23:17.341 --> 0:23:21.341
<v Speaker 1>doing a lot of trying to put forward this other

0:23:21.542 --> 0:23:24.982
<v Speaker 1>version of herself, which I understand. Since she became famous

0:23:25.022 --> 0:23:29.142
<v Speaker 1>by hooking up with Harry, the media has written her

0:23:29.182 --> 0:23:33.341
<v Speaker 1>story for her and her family have and then they

0:23:33.341 --> 0:23:36.821
<v Speaker 1>did that Netflix show where they had to be very

0:23:36.861 --> 0:23:41.061
<v Speaker 1>negative and angsty about their whole experience, which I understand

0:23:41.141 --> 0:23:43.022
<v Speaker 1>to be true from their point of view. But she's

0:23:43.061 --> 0:23:47.061
<v Speaker 1>never been able to just be kind of ordinary.

0:23:46.742 --> 0:23:49.141
<v Speaker 4>And there's an irony to and a lot of the

0:23:49.182 --> 0:23:52.341
<v Speaker 4>reviews are like Megan, it's desperate for us to like her.

0:23:52.542 --> 0:23:54.901
<v Speaker 4>It's like, imagine how traumatizing it would be to be

0:23:54.982 --> 0:23:57.982
<v Speaker 4>the most hated woman in the world for the very

0:23:58.302 --> 0:24:02.101
<v Speaker 4>worst crime she could maybe be guilty of is not

0:24:02.222 --> 0:24:07.542
<v Speaker 4>managing staff well Maybey. Yeah, being someone who some people

0:24:07.581 --> 0:24:09.222
<v Speaker 4>don't like, which is a.

0:24:09.222 --> 0:24:11.942
<v Speaker 1>Very also to say about a person of color. Yeah,

0:24:12.022 --> 0:24:14.302
<v Speaker 1>you know that they're uppity. That's very coded.

0:24:14.581 --> 0:24:15.462
<v Speaker 3>And in the same way.

0:24:15.542 --> 0:24:16.941
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I know a lot of people who have

0:24:17.061 --> 0:24:19.502
<v Speaker 4>watched it and they don't warm to Megan, right. They

0:24:19.861 --> 0:24:21.901
<v Speaker 4>they don't relate to it to whether it's a sense

0:24:21.901 --> 0:24:23.901
<v Speaker 4>of humor or her She doesn't.

0:24:23.661 --> 0:24:25.982
<v Speaker 1>Have a sense of humor. And it's all very perfect,

0:24:26.101 --> 0:24:28.502
<v Speaker 1>and that isn't how you connect, no matter how many

0:24:28.581 --> 0:24:31.382
<v Speaker 1>times she says, Oh, it doesn't have to be perfect,

0:24:31.422 --> 0:24:34.662
<v Speaker 1>and I'm just ordinary and has her bare feet. It's

0:24:34.821 --> 0:24:38.941
<v Speaker 1>so unrelatable that she's desperately wanting to be liked and

0:24:39.061 --> 0:24:41.462
<v Speaker 1>seen for who she is. But there's this massive barrier

0:24:41.861 --> 0:24:45.421
<v Speaker 1>because when you take a crew of eighty people to

0:24:45.621 --> 0:24:49.302
<v Speaker 1>make a show about how easy it is to make breakfast,

0:24:50.341 --> 0:24:51.581
<v Speaker 1>there's massive disconnect.

0:24:51.982 --> 0:24:54.461
<v Speaker 2>I don't know about that because I think again, she

0:24:54.581 --> 0:24:57.262
<v Speaker 2>is very deliberately made a show that isn't really about her,

0:24:57.462 --> 0:24:59.181
<v Speaker 2>you know what I mean. It's supposed to be about

0:24:59.222 --> 0:25:02.382
<v Speaker 2>the things so Mike dms and everything and Instagram over

0:25:02.381 --> 0:25:04.821
<v Speaker 2>the weekend. We're just full of people sharing themselves, making

0:25:04.942 --> 0:25:07.222
<v Speaker 2>things that Megan's making, some of them badly, some of

0:25:07.262 --> 0:25:09.701
<v Speaker 2>them well. But people are into it. She's given us

0:25:09.742 --> 0:25:12.981
<v Speaker 2>other things to talk about other than just her. But

0:25:13.101 --> 0:25:15.542
<v Speaker 2>the other thing is I think, because I agree with

0:25:15.581 --> 0:25:17.302
<v Speaker 2>you Mia that while I was watching it, one of

0:25:17.302 --> 0:25:19.861
<v Speaker 2>the things I wrote down, especially that first time, is

0:25:19.861 --> 0:25:23.022
<v Speaker 2>why does she so desperate for everybody to like her

0:25:23.061 --> 0:25:25.462
<v Speaker 2>so much? And as you've just said, Jesse, I think

0:25:25.502 --> 0:25:27.981
<v Speaker 2>that definitely everybody hating you for however long would do

0:25:28.022 --> 0:25:30.821
<v Speaker 2>that to you. And this bumps into something that was

0:25:30.901 --> 0:25:32.941
<v Speaker 2>obviously always a problem with the Royals.

0:25:33.022 --> 0:25:33.182
<v Speaker 4>Right.

0:25:33.821 --> 0:25:35.782
<v Speaker 2>Megan is, and this has been said before, it's non

0:25:35.782 --> 0:25:38.381
<v Speaker 2>original thought, a creature of American aspiration.

0:25:38.581 --> 0:25:38.782
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:25:38.861 --> 0:25:42.302
<v Speaker 2>She obviously gets an enormous amount of pleasure from the

0:25:42.302 --> 0:25:44.581
<v Speaker 2>fact that she now has a lovely life with lovely

0:25:44.621 --> 0:25:47.621
<v Speaker 2>stuff in it, and she gets to meet people who

0:25:47.702 --> 0:25:50.262
<v Speaker 2>are very high for lutin and interesting, and she gets

0:25:50.341 --> 0:25:53.141
<v Speaker 2>just In Trudeau's family to come over for summer and whatever,

0:25:53.182 --> 0:25:55.141
<v Speaker 2>and she's hanging out with it like she obviously likes

0:25:55.222 --> 0:25:58.621
<v Speaker 2>all that, And in America that is in no way shamed.

0:25:58.942 --> 0:26:03.861
<v Speaker 2>Being ambitious and socially ambitious I'm talking about too, is

0:26:03.942 --> 0:26:08.342
<v Speaker 2>not shamed in Britain, and particularly if you're royal. You're

0:26:08.422 --> 0:26:10.981
<v Speaker 2>born at the top, right, there's nowhere to aspire to,

0:26:11.422 --> 0:26:13.981
<v Speaker 2>which is why they're often very busy making their houses

0:26:14.022 --> 0:26:16.661
<v Speaker 2>look a bit crumbly, and they don't have all the

0:26:16.661 --> 0:26:19.581
<v Speaker 2>flushing toilets and they don't have all that stuff. I

0:26:19.621 --> 0:26:22.141
<v Speaker 2>think that's another reason why it was always going to

0:26:22.182 --> 0:26:26.381
<v Speaker 2>be hard for her, who's obviously a striver, obviously tries

0:26:26.502 --> 0:26:28.662
<v Speaker 2>very hard. Obviously she says it out loud a couple

0:26:28.702 --> 0:26:30.821
<v Speaker 2>of times. I love to get a gold star. I

0:26:30.861 --> 0:26:32.701
<v Speaker 2>love it when I get approvals and someone tells me

0:26:32.742 --> 0:26:36.181
<v Speaker 2>I've done a great job. That is very unroyal. And

0:26:36.222 --> 0:26:39.502
<v Speaker 2>so even though it makes her the perfect princess because she's,

0:26:39.821 --> 0:26:43.061
<v Speaker 2>you know, performing at this level all the time, that's

0:26:43.101 --> 0:26:45.222
<v Speaker 2>not what being a princess is supposed to be. It's

0:26:45.222 --> 0:26:47.341
<v Speaker 2>supposed to be effortless.

0:26:46.742 --> 0:26:48.621
<v Speaker 1>And also service to others. I think the thing that

0:26:48.702 --> 0:26:54.821
<v Speaker 1>rankles me most is this exhaustion with all these women,

0:26:54.821 --> 0:26:58.821
<v Speaker 1>whether it's Nara Smith who makes you know, rice bubbles

0:26:58.821 --> 0:27:01.942
<v Speaker 1>from scratch with a grain of rice when her children

0:27:01.982 --> 0:27:07.622
<v Speaker 1>want breakfast to Megan they're women who are performing the

0:27:07.702 --> 0:27:12.462
<v Speaker 1>act of leisure and domesticity, and yet they're being paid

0:27:12.502 --> 0:27:16.262
<v Speaker 1>for it, and there's a whole business behind what they're doing.

0:27:17.341 --> 0:27:18.302
<v Speaker 3>Constraints.

0:27:18.581 --> 0:27:23.022
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, the woman who is making her children breakfast does

0:27:23.101 --> 0:27:26.742
<v Speaker 4>so with fifty five constraints of the modern world on her.

0:27:26.982 --> 0:27:31.822
<v Speaker 2>Such time doesn't want to pop like rice bubbles from scratch,

0:27:31.821 --> 0:27:33.101
<v Speaker 2>as well as not being able.

0:27:32.901 --> 0:27:37.901
<v Speaker 1>To fetishizing the stuff that most women have to just

0:27:38.182 --> 0:27:41.581
<v Speaker 1>do every day. And yes, it would be lovely to

0:27:41.661 --> 0:27:44.502
<v Speaker 1>decant a packet of crackers and put them into a

0:27:44.542 --> 0:27:48.341
<v Speaker 1>lovely cellophane thing and make a calligraphy, but most of

0:27:48.381 --> 0:27:51.421
<v Speaker 1>us don't have a crew of eighty people and millions

0:27:51.422 --> 0:27:55.061
<v Speaker 1>of dollars from Netflix to make that happen. And the

0:27:55.141 --> 0:27:58.061
<v Speaker 1>disingenuine usiness from me is twofold.

0:27:58.141 --> 0:27:59.142
<v Speaker 3>First of all, it's.

0:27:58.982 --> 0:28:03.821
<v Speaker 1>The being a duchess and cosplaying royalty, but also trying

0:28:03.821 --> 0:28:06.702
<v Speaker 1>to come across as one of the people, and also

0:28:07.141 --> 0:28:12.142
<v Speaker 1>cose playing leisure and domesticity when it's hard work and

0:28:12.581 --> 0:28:14.661
<v Speaker 1>it takes a lot of money and a lot of time.

0:28:15.101 --> 0:28:17.981
<v Speaker 1>And this is something that women are taught to have

0:28:18.022 --> 0:28:21.702
<v Speaker 1>our value from our abilities as homemakers. And yet now

0:28:21.702 --> 0:28:24.142
<v Speaker 1>we're also expected to go out and work and earn

0:28:24.141 --> 0:28:25.941
<v Speaker 1>a living and often support our families.

0:28:26.101 --> 0:28:28.701
<v Speaker 2>But some women do love to aspire to that, like

0:28:28.782 --> 0:28:31.061
<v Speaker 2>not necessarily doing it all the time. But the three

0:28:31.101 --> 0:28:33.302
<v Speaker 2>of us have all obviously given ourselves away when talking

0:28:33.302 --> 0:28:37.581
<v Speaker 2>about hosting that it's not our jam literally, But you know,

0:28:37.702 --> 0:28:40.421
<v Speaker 2>I know plenty of people who get an enormous amount

0:28:40.462 --> 0:28:43.142
<v Speaker 2>of pleasure out of baking a beautiful cake. I don't

0:28:43.222 --> 0:28:46.782
<v Speaker 2>think that just because Megan, and she's not the only one.

0:28:46.782 --> 0:28:50.062
<v Speaker 2>There's a whole industry of this, of literally lifestyle content.

0:28:50.702 --> 0:28:52.862
<v Speaker 2>It's not all about us and making us feel bad,

0:28:52.942 --> 0:28:55.342
<v Speaker 2>and lots of women love plugging into it, so what's

0:28:55.382 --> 0:28:55.862
<v Speaker 2>wrong with that?

0:28:56.102 --> 0:28:58.582
<v Speaker 4>And on the other hand, I think that seeing through

0:28:58.622 --> 0:29:00.622
<v Speaker 4>the Thomas mirkl lens is that this is a woman

0:29:00.622 --> 0:29:04.142
<v Speaker 4>who is estranged from her father and her brother, who

0:29:04.182 --> 0:29:06.342
<v Speaker 4>is raising children with a man who lost his mother

0:29:06.422 --> 0:29:08.702
<v Speaker 4>very very young. And I just think that there's something

0:29:08.782 --> 0:29:12.902
<v Speaker 4>in trying to create a childhood that was either different

0:29:12.982 --> 0:29:15.862
<v Speaker 4>from your own or can be. You know, people who

0:29:15.942 --> 0:29:19.102
<v Speaker 4>who have a strange family members raising little children can

0:29:19.142 --> 0:29:21.462
<v Speaker 4>be really confronting because bring back a lot of memories.

0:29:21.542 --> 0:29:23.742
<v Speaker 4>And Harry grew up in a circus like I can

0:29:23.902 --> 0:29:28.382
<v Speaker 4>understand trying to make that a little bit more perfect.

0:29:28.022 --> 0:29:30.701
<v Speaker 1>And for her too, because she talks about growing up

0:29:30.702 --> 0:29:33.302
<v Speaker 1>as a latchkey kid. She had a single mum and.

0:29:33.182 --> 0:29:35.062
<v Speaker 3>Which Thomas Michael completely denies.

0:29:35.302 --> 0:29:37.902
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but her parents were divorced and she lived either

0:29:37.942 --> 0:29:39.542
<v Speaker 1>with her dad or her mum. But she had a

0:29:39.582 --> 0:29:42.542
<v Speaker 1>single mum or a single dad, and her parents worked.

0:29:42.702 --> 0:29:47.662
<v Speaker 1>And so it's not the aspiration of it's not nice

0:29:47.661 --> 0:29:50.701
<v Speaker 1>to make a cake or make people feel welcome, or

0:29:50.702 --> 0:29:52.742
<v Speaker 1>do it little, you know, arrange some flowers.

0:29:53.142 --> 0:29:53.782
<v Speaker 3>It's not that.

0:29:53.942 --> 0:29:58.062
<v Speaker 1>It's the making it seem really easy and effortless and

0:29:58.502 --> 0:30:01.782
<v Speaker 1>hiding all the work and the effort and the money

0:30:01.822 --> 0:30:04.981
<v Speaker 1>and the time that it takes, as if anyone can

0:30:05.062 --> 0:30:06.782
<v Speaker 1>do it. We know that's not true.

0:30:07.582 --> 0:30:10.462
<v Speaker 2>We'd have some feedback for the Constitution. If you thought

0:30:10.542 --> 0:30:13.022
<v Speaker 2>we were having a federal election any minute now, You're

0:30:13.022 --> 0:30:16.742
<v Speaker 2>not alone. But ex cyclone Alfred paid to that this weekend,

0:30:16.822 --> 0:30:19.542
<v Speaker 2>as it should, and instead we're back in election limbo

0:30:20.062 --> 0:30:22.782
<v Speaker 2>and Instagram reel by Charlotte Mortlock, friend of the pod

0:30:22.982 --> 0:30:25.902
<v Speaker 2>and who's worked in politics for years, articulated why this

0:30:25.982 --> 0:30:27.981
<v Speaker 2>is a problem and what should happen to solve it,

0:30:28.062 --> 0:30:30.542
<v Speaker 2>and it's an opinion it has to be said that

0:30:30.661 --> 0:30:33.421
<v Speaker 2>shared by the Prime Minister sometimes Peter Dutton and plenty

0:30:33.422 --> 0:30:35.702
<v Speaker 2>of people in politics. They haven't made a reel about

0:30:35.702 --> 0:30:37.902
<v Speaker 2>it yet and they should because here's what Charlotte said.

0:30:38.302 --> 0:30:41.782
<v Speaker 5>The Prime Minister was set to call the election tomorrow

0:30:41.942 --> 0:30:45.502
<v Speaker 5>and that would mean an April twelve election that is

0:30:45.582 --> 0:30:48.261
<v Speaker 5>no longer happening and I have no critique of that.

0:30:48.262 --> 0:30:50.421
<v Speaker 5>The government needs to be focused on the emergency efforts

0:30:50.422 --> 0:30:53.542
<v Speaker 5>and the recovery efforts. However, it does mean that Australia

0:30:53.622 --> 0:30:57.502
<v Speaker 5>is going to be in this quasi campaign limbo for

0:30:57.661 --> 0:31:01.822
<v Speaker 5>yet another month because we have Easter Anzac Day, so

0:31:01.942 --> 0:31:04.382
<v Speaker 5>now we're not having the election tool may That means

0:31:04.422 --> 0:31:06.782
<v Speaker 5>we've been in kind of this campaign mode for around

0:31:06.822 --> 0:31:11.741
<v Speaker 5>six to eight months and very little effective democracy has

0:31:11.862 --> 0:31:16.102
<v Speaker 5>done in that time because everyone is hyper, you know,

0:31:16.222 --> 0:31:18.622
<v Speaker 5>part of the hyper focused on political point scoring.

0:31:18.702 --> 0:31:19.742
<v Speaker 3>That is just the reality.

0:31:20.782 --> 0:31:23.062
<v Speaker 5>We need to change to a four year term and

0:31:23.262 --> 0:31:26.142
<v Speaker 5>it needs to be a fixed term because you're also

0:31:26.342 --> 0:31:29.622
<v Speaker 5>trying to always gain the system, hold the election on

0:31:29.702 --> 0:31:32.661
<v Speaker 5>a date that suits you when you've got momentum for

0:31:32.702 --> 0:31:34.142
<v Speaker 5>your party, again, no critique.

0:31:34.142 --> 0:31:36.742
<v Speaker 3>That is a reality, but that's not always.

0:31:36.422 --> 0:31:38.902
<v Speaker 5>In the country's interests. And so I do think that

0:31:39.702 --> 0:31:42.622
<v Speaker 5>we really need to have a really good look at

0:31:42.622 --> 0:31:46.302
<v Speaker 5>our democracy and why we can't change that and why

0:31:46.342 --> 0:31:48.182
<v Speaker 5>it's taken us so long to get to that point.

0:31:48.222 --> 0:31:50.302
<v Speaker 5>And I don't think it was being controversial. I think

0:31:50.302 --> 0:31:53.662
<v Speaker 5>we make our politicians look a lot longer into the future,

0:31:53.782 --> 0:31:55.782
<v Speaker 5>or at least a little, which is only a good thing.

0:31:55.982 --> 0:31:58.221
<v Speaker 2>So for a bit of context for us to change,

0:31:58.302 --> 0:32:00.902
<v Speaker 2>Australia to change to a four year fixed term, which

0:32:00.942 --> 0:32:02.822
<v Speaker 2>is what America has, It's what Britain has, it's what

0:32:02.862 --> 0:32:03.662
<v Speaker 2>lots of places happen.

0:32:04.062 --> 0:32:06.582
<v Speaker 3>Does a fixed term mean they don't get to decide?

0:32:06.742 --> 0:32:09.102
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so fixed term. What they're talking about there is

0:32:09.102 --> 0:32:11.622
<v Speaker 2>that you go right, so the election is always on

0:32:12.382 --> 0:32:16.302
<v Speaker 2>November get whatever, or it always has to be before

0:32:16.382 --> 0:32:18.982
<v Speaker 2>this date, and that instead of three year terms, which

0:32:19.022 --> 0:32:21.262
<v Speaker 2>is what Australia has, you have four year terms. Now

0:32:21.542 --> 0:32:23.661
<v Speaker 2>the US do that, the UK do that. Actually, our

0:32:23.702 --> 0:32:26.382
<v Speaker 2>states and territories also do it. Our state and territory

0:32:26.422 --> 0:32:29.102
<v Speaker 2>elections I've never noticed, to be honest, always fall at

0:32:29.102 --> 0:32:31.741
<v Speaker 2>the same time and a fixed term. But for this

0:32:31.862 --> 0:32:34.542
<v Speaker 2>to happen at a federal level, that has to be

0:32:34.582 --> 0:32:38.382
<v Speaker 2>a referendum because it would be changing the constitution. So

0:32:38.462 --> 0:32:40.502
<v Speaker 2>when I was saying before that the Prime Minister's voice

0:32:40.502 --> 0:32:43.221
<v Speaker 2>support and both sides of politics have voiced support for this.

0:32:43.342 --> 0:32:46.622
<v Speaker 2>Over time, there is not very much appetite for a

0:32:46.661 --> 0:32:49.542
<v Speaker 2>referendum because we know how they go.

0:32:50.661 --> 0:32:54.502
<v Speaker 1>After the break snaff and why it's all over your phone.

0:32:54.542 --> 0:32:56.342
<v Speaker 3>Wan unlimited out loud access.

0:32:56.582 --> 0:33:00.661
<v Speaker 4>We drop episodes every Tuesday and Thursday exclusively for Mum

0:33:00.742 --> 0:33:03.742
<v Speaker 4>and Maya subscribers. Follow the link in the show notes

0:33:03.782 --> 0:33:06.262
<v Speaker 4>to get us in your ears five days a week,

0:33:06.382 --> 0:33:17.422
<v Speaker 4>and a huge thank you to all our current subscribers.

0:33:19.382 --> 0:33:23.062
<v Speaker 1>If you're wondering why being online seems so relentlessly exhausting

0:33:23.382 --> 0:33:27.942
<v Speaker 1>lately and why you're so often left with an anxiety, hangover,

0:33:28.062 --> 0:33:31.062
<v Speaker 1>or just a feeling of yuckiness as you scroll, it

0:33:31.142 --> 0:33:35.822
<v Speaker 1>could be because of snaff. The founder of BuzzFeed, Jonah

0:33:35.862 --> 0:33:39.462
<v Speaker 1>pretty recently wrote a think piece that explained the concept

0:33:39.462 --> 0:33:43.142
<v Speaker 1>of snaff and how it has come to dominate social media.

0:33:43.902 --> 0:33:46.701
<v Speaker 1>He says that social media has become overrun with snaff,

0:33:46.742 --> 0:33:51.342
<v Speaker 1>and snaff stands for s is for stakes, exaggerating the

0:33:51.382 --> 0:33:55.062
<v Speaker 1>stakes to make the content urgent and existential. N is

0:33:55.102 --> 0:33:59.702
<v Speaker 1>for novelty, manufacturing novelty, and spinning content as being this

0:33:59.742 --> 0:34:03.701
<v Speaker 1>has never happened before. A is for anger, manipulating people's

0:34:03.742 --> 0:34:07.582
<v Speaker 1>anger to drive engagement via outrage. R is for retention.

0:34:08.022 --> 0:34:12.661
<v Speaker 1>Retention hacks include like withholding info like wait till the end,

0:34:12.742 --> 0:34:16.182
<v Speaker 1>watch till the end, or clickbaiting. And F is for fear,

0:34:16.382 --> 0:34:19.142
<v Speaker 1>so really taking advantage of fear to make people focus

0:34:19.582 --> 0:34:22.781
<v Speaker 1>with urgency on the content. So he argues that the

0:34:22.822 --> 0:34:25.822
<v Speaker 1>social media overlords at Meta and TikTok don't care about

0:34:26.022 --> 0:34:29.462
<v Speaker 1>actual content. They care about keeping people addicted to scrolling

0:34:29.862 --> 0:34:32.741
<v Speaker 1>so that they can monetize our eyeballs for longer. I

0:34:32.781 --> 0:34:35.462
<v Speaker 1>think we all by this stage know that to be true.

0:34:35.622 --> 0:34:38.861
<v Speaker 1>And the result of that is this proliferation of a

0:34:38.902 --> 0:34:43.982
<v Speaker 1>particular type of content that the algorithm rewards aka snaff.

0:34:44.822 --> 0:34:47.261
<v Speaker 1>So it means that the type of content that gets

0:34:47.261 --> 0:34:49.902
<v Speaker 1>created and recommended isn't the best content, but the content

0:34:49.942 --> 0:34:52.902
<v Speaker 1>that elicits the most compulsive and predictable response from the

0:34:52.982 --> 0:34:55.981
<v Speaker 1>human brain. Is this ringing a little bit true for you, Jesson?

0:34:56.062 --> 0:35:02.062
<v Speaker 4>My goodness, it explains literally everything from publishers to politicians,

0:35:02.181 --> 0:35:05.342
<v Speaker 4>to individual commentators.

0:35:04.701 --> 0:35:06.102
<v Speaker 1>Influencers TV shows.

0:35:06.181 --> 0:35:08.302
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, yeah, I think I saw it over the weekend.

0:35:08.942 --> 0:35:12.502
<v Speaker 4>Sometimes there are attempts at snaff. There's a story that

0:35:12.582 --> 0:35:15.421
<v Speaker 4>people are like, this is rich with potential snaff. Let's

0:35:15.422 --> 0:35:16.062
<v Speaker 4>try and find it.

0:35:16.142 --> 0:35:17.062
<v Speaker 1>What's the snaff angle?

0:35:17.181 --> 0:35:18.341
<v Speaker 3>Where's the snaff in this?

0:35:18.982 --> 0:35:21.701
<v Speaker 4>And I was watching it unfold over the weekend with

0:35:22.142 --> 0:35:25.781
<v Speaker 4>the another Simple Favor premiere because it's Blake Lively, right,

0:35:25.822 --> 0:35:27.422
<v Speaker 4>and the Blake Lively She's got it.

0:35:27.701 --> 0:35:29.262
<v Speaker 3>It's a second movie sequel.

0:35:29.382 --> 0:35:31.822
<v Speaker 4>It's a sequel with the it was the Anna Kendrick

0:35:31.862 --> 0:35:35.582
<v Speaker 4>movie and Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni was sort of

0:35:35.622 --> 0:35:39.462
<v Speaker 4>the ultimate snaff story. There was enormous novelty. The stakes

0:35:39.462 --> 0:35:42.301
<v Speaker 4>were so high. Either a woman was sexually assaulted or

0:35:42.342 --> 0:35:46.062
<v Speaker 4>she lied about it, which you know was anger fear,

0:35:46.462 --> 0:35:49.701
<v Speaker 4>and the retention was the receipts. It was like it

0:35:49.741 --> 0:35:52.662
<v Speaker 4>was perfect because you could do a fifteen minute TikTok

0:35:52.741 --> 0:35:56.181
<v Speaker 4>video on it with all the information and people were

0:35:56.261 --> 0:35:59.301
<v Speaker 4>just stuck to it. And so I saw attempts to

0:35:59.382 --> 0:36:02.382
<v Speaker 4>kind of find the snaff in this story over the weekend,

0:36:02.462 --> 0:36:04.942
<v Speaker 4>and there was a headline that I read this morning.

0:36:04.982 --> 0:36:09.142
<v Speaker 4>That was like Anna Kendrick's three word reply to a

0:36:09.221 --> 0:36:12.622
<v Speaker 4>quest about working with Blake Lively. And here's what she

0:36:12.661 --> 0:36:14.221
<v Speaker 4>actually said, What.

0:36:14.181 --> 0:36:20.622
<v Speaker 3>Does it mean to be working with Blake again? Does

0:36:20.701 --> 0:36:22.542
<v Speaker 3>that it? To be clear? All she said was oh,

0:36:22.582 --> 0:36:24.901
<v Speaker 3>you know, and then it feels like she got interrupted. Yeah,

0:36:25.022 --> 0:36:26.462
<v Speaker 3>like that was the entire story.

0:36:26.582 --> 0:36:29.741
<v Speaker 4>So if you feel as though you go onto the

0:36:29.781 --> 0:36:35.381
<v Speaker 4>internet and everything feels existential, everything feels like life or death,

0:36:36.062 --> 0:36:40.222
<v Speaker 4>that the biggest commentators in Australia right now look as though,

0:36:40.661 --> 0:36:42.901
<v Speaker 4>I'm going to be completely honest about how I feel

0:36:42.902 --> 0:36:45.381
<v Speaker 4>about it. Look as though they are unwell because they

0:36:45.422 --> 0:36:48.622
<v Speaker 4>are stuck in this cycle.

0:36:48.622 --> 0:36:51.221
<v Speaker 1>Of everything's in emergency and.

0:36:51.221 --> 0:36:54.181
<v Speaker 4>Almost like mania of just you see them get on,

0:36:54.942 --> 0:36:57.781
<v Speaker 4>they're breathless. I don't actually think that's put on. I

0:36:57.822 --> 0:37:01.221
<v Speaker 4>think that you become so invested in the algorithm and

0:37:01.261 --> 0:37:04.102
<v Speaker 4>the reward. We're like mice with little every time we

0:37:04.142 --> 0:37:06.262
<v Speaker 4>press a button, we get a reward, and we're addicted

0:37:06.302 --> 0:37:10.341
<v Speaker 4>to this drug. And you see people radical themselves in

0:37:10.382 --> 0:37:13.381
<v Speaker 4>their ideas because they get like almost taken away by

0:37:13.422 --> 0:37:15.382
<v Speaker 4>the scale of the thing they're talking about.

0:37:15.622 --> 0:37:19.582
<v Speaker 2>Also, this is because all content is so examined now,

0:37:19.622 --> 0:37:21.582
<v Speaker 2>So to pull the curtain back a little bit, like

0:37:21.661 --> 0:37:24.262
<v Speaker 2>ever since I've worked at digital media, we know everything

0:37:24.302 --> 0:37:26.741
<v Speaker 2>about why people click on things, right, We've known that

0:37:26.781 --> 0:37:28.661
<v Speaker 2>for a very long time, and so in the old

0:37:28.701 --> 0:37:30.661
<v Speaker 2>days we used to call it clickbait, very similar to

0:37:30.701 --> 0:37:34.622
<v Speaker 2>snaff really like, make it seem really dramatic, hold back

0:37:34.701 --> 0:37:37.382
<v Speaker 2>something of novelty, make sure there's a reason to retain

0:37:37.462 --> 0:37:39.861
<v Speaker 2>them by clicking. You know all of those things, right,

0:37:40.302 --> 0:37:44.701
<v Speaker 2>And so we are all hyper data driven, and the

0:37:44.741 --> 0:37:48.421
<v Speaker 2>people who are constantly snaffing, I'm just trying to find

0:37:48.422 --> 0:37:49.942
<v Speaker 2>different ways to use the word because I love it

0:37:49.942 --> 0:37:53.982
<v Speaker 2>so much. Constantly snaffing on the Internet, obviously are doing

0:37:53.982 --> 0:37:57.262
<v Speaker 2>it for monetary reasons, engagement reasons, validation reasons.

0:37:57.302 --> 0:37:58.342
<v Speaker 1>Attention reasons.

0:37:58.382 --> 0:38:00.422
<v Speaker 3>Literally there's a job, yeah.

0:38:00.342 --> 0:38:02.982
<v Speaker 2>Because they know it works. So you'll notice that with

0:38:03.062 --> 0:38:05.301
<v Speaker 2>any of the socials you follow, including ours, there'll be

0:38:05.302 --> 0:38:07.102
<v Speaker 2>a while where the headlines look like this, and then

0:38:07.142 --> 0:38:08.901
<v Speaker 2>they'll change and now they'll look like that, and then

0:38:08.942 --> 0:38:10.582
<v Speaker 2>there'll be a time when the pictures look like this,

0:38:10.661 --> 0:38:14.582
<v Speaker 2>and then they look like that. Isn't this just playing

0:38:14.701 --> 0:38:17.502
<v Speaker 2>people where they are? You know what I mean? Like

0:38:17.542 --> 0:38:18.941
<v Speaker 2>if it didn't work, we wouldn't.

0:38:18.622 --> 0:38:21.821
<v Speaker 1>Do it well in a way, yes, because in order

0:38:21.862 --> 0:38:23.821
<v Speaker 1>to stay relevant and get views so that they can

0:38:23.862 --> 0:38:27.062
<v Speaker 1>make money, creators a force to make snaff content or

0:38:27.142 --> 0:38:30.462
<v Speaker 1>at least market the content that they make from a

0:38:30.502 --> 0:38:34.821
<v Speaker 1>snaff point of view. And what Jonah Pardi argues in

0:38:34.862 --> 0:38:38.381
<v Speaker 1>this piece is that snaff content is reshaping politics and

0:38:38.422 --> 0:38:42.661
<v Speaker 1>culture and society, and it's often producing hateful and misleading

0:38:43.142 --> 0:38:46.261
<v Speaker 1>or really destructive content. Because the one word that isn't

0:38:46.261 --> 0:38:48.421
<v Speaker 1>in there that I think ends should be more more

0:38:48.462 --> 0:38:52.542
<v Speaker 1>than for novelty. It should be for negativity because feel good,

0:38:52.661 --> 0:38:57.701
<v Speaker 1>positive content does not elicit that fight or flight or

0:38:57.781 --> 0:38:59.421
<v Speaker 1>fury response in you.

0:38:59.502 --> 0:39:01.301
<v Speaker 4>Right, I've had to I think we've probably all had

0:39:01.302 --> 0:39:03.902
<v Speaker 4>this as an editor. You have people come in or

0:39:03.942 --> 0:39:06.542
<v Speaker 4>even brands and they say, why don't we do some

0:39:06.582 --> 0:39:09.261
<v Speaker 4>good news And I've had to say, no, one gives

0:39:09.261 --> 0:39:11.022
<v Speaker 4>a shit about good news.

0:39:11.022 --> 0:39:13.542
<v Speaker 3>And so it doesn't feel like an emergency exactly right.

0:39:13.622 --> 0:39:16.701
<v Speaker 4>It doesn't kind of inspire any feeling in you. And

0:39:16.741 --> 0:39:18.741
<v Speaker 4>we've all played this game. I've had to play this

0:39:18.862 --> 0:39:22.821
<v Speaker 4>game and have felt myself do it online. There was

0:39:22.822 --> 0:39:25.582
<v Speaker 4>a great quote in this article about how the internet

0:39:25.661 --> 0:39:29.102
<v Speaker 4>used to serve beer and wine at a communal dinner party,

0:39:29.221 --> 0:39:32.861
<v Speaker 4>and now there's fentanyl and crack, and to try and

0:39:33.022 --> 0:39:35.942
<v Speaker 4>make people pay for wine when they can get crack

0:39:36.022 --> 0:39:38.142
<v Speaker 4>for free is very difficult.

0:39:38.221 --> 0:39:40.582
<v Speaker 1>The whole Internet is running on crack and fentanyl.

0:39:40.781 --> 0:39:43.062
<v Speaker 4>Yes, But I did think, as I agorithm as I

0:39:43.142 --> 0:39:47.341
<v Speaker 4>was reading this, I'm someone who probably turns towards criticism

0:39:47.502 --> 0:39:52.861
<v Speaker 4>of institutions, that monopoly that the tech industries have over

0:39:52.942 --> 0:39:55.062
<v Speaker 4>algorithms and all of that. I agree that this is

0:39:55.102 --> 0:40:00.902
<v Speaker 4>an algorithmic issue. I do think that individuals and publishers

0:40:01.022 --> 0:40:03.542
<v Speaker 4>need to take some responsibility, which is what BuzzFeed is doing.

0:40:03.701 --> 0:40:06.941
<v Speaker 4>But I think it's a cop out to go, well,

0:40:06.982 --> 0:40:10.741
<v Speaker 4>I'm just playing the algorithm. As someone who exists as

0:40:10.822 --> 0:40:12.622
<v Speaker 4>a person on the Internet and as a person in

0:40:12.622 --> 0:40:16.821
<v Speaker 4>the media, I have felt myself get sucked into the

0:40:16.942 --> 0:40:21.022
<v Speaker 4>vortex of snuff and I have felt myself have to

0:40:21.181 --> 0:40:23.622
<v Speaker 4>literally sit down and go what are your values?

0:40:24.342 --> 0:40:25.622
<v Speaker 3>What are your boundaries?

0:40:25.822 --> 0:40:28.502
<v Speaker 4>On the internet? What do you want to do? If

0:40:28.542 --> 0:40:31.062
<v Speaker 4>you are chasing an algorithm, you're going to end up

0:40:31.062 --> 0:40:33.381
<v Speaker 4>as a person you don't like. Because often you'll see

0:40:33.382 --> 0:40:36.142
<v Speaker 4>a piece of content and it might be funny, and

0:40:36.302 --> 0:40:39.381
<v Speaker 4>it's got novelty, and it's gone absolutely viral, and you go,

0:40:39.862 --> 0:40:45.022
<v Speaker 4>that is ultimately hateful. You've just spurted hate into the world.

0:40:45.582 --> 0:40:48.062
<v Speaker 4>You've not made the world better or anyone's day better.

0:40:48.902 --> 0:40:52.781
<v Speaker 4>And to resist that as someone who creates content is

0:40:53.022 --> 0:40:53.742
<v Speaker 4>really hard.

0:40:54.382 --> 0:40:56.622
<v Speaker 1>I think that's why a lot of us are looking.

0:40:56.822 --> 0:40:58.781
<v Speaker 1>A lot of content creators are looking to have a

0:40:58.781 --> 0:41:04.022
<v Speaker 1>smaller audience because the way to ride the algorithm is

0:41:04.062 --> 0:41:07.181
<v Speaker 1>with snuff. And in terms of it changing culture, you

0:41:07.221 --> 0:41:09.422
<v Speaker 1>can see it in so many ways. So in politics,

0:41:09.542 --> 0:41:13.142
<v Speaker 1>the obvious example is Trump. Trump is the ultimate snaff

0:41:13.181 --> 0:41:18.542
<v Speaker 1>political candidate versus someone like Joe Biden had his own issues.

0:41:18.542 --> 0:41:22.462
<v Speaker 1>But Kamala Harris is just like was fairly neutral. She

0:41:22.582 --> 0:41:24.941
<v Speaker 1>wasn't going to get the same amount of attention. Look

0:41:24.982 --> 0:41:28.181
<v Speaker 1>at in TV shows The Bachelor, there was not that

0:41:28.342 --> 0:41:31.822
<v Speaker 1>high stakes drama and it faded away only to re

0:41:31.822 --> 0:41:36.622
<v Speaker 1>replaced by maths, which is constant snaff, constant drama, outrage, scandal,

0:41:37.142 --> 0:41:39.901
<v Speaker 1>high stakes. So that's how you can see that it's

0:41:40.062 --> 0:41:40.942
<v Speaker 1>shaping the culture.

0:41:41.181 --> 0:41:44.062
<v Speaker 2>I think people are wise to snaff and have been

0:41:44.062 --> 0:41:45.542
<v Speaker 2>for a while, even if they didn't know what it

0:41:45.582 --> 0:41:47.582
<v Speaker 2>was called. Because if you look at news refusal. We've

0:41:47.622 --> 0:41:49.982
<v Speaker 2>talked about that a lot, people turning away from news.

0:41:50.382 --> 0:41:52.901
<v Speaker 2>I promise that it's only like two more days. I'm

0:41:52.902 --> 0:41:57.102
<v Speaker 2>allowed to resference Megan and everything. If a TV show

0:41:57.181 --> 0:42:00.062
<v Speaker 2>is a legitimate hit, it is for this reason in

0:42:00.102 --> 0:42:02.861
<v Speaker 2>lots of ways, well in two different ways. Partly it's

0:42:02.862 --> 0:42:05.102
<v Speaker 2>snaff bait because the people who hater will watch it

0:42:05.142 --> 0:42:08.261
<v Speaker 2>and go back. But the actual show itself, as you've

0:42:08.261 --> 0:42:12.102
<v Speaker 2>already said today, Maya is so inoffensive and pleasant. And

0:42:12.181 --> 0:42:16.022
<v Speaker 2>I know that I'm often looking for, particularly in audio,

0:42:16.142 --> 0:42:19.902
<v Speaker 2>like books or podcasts or things when I've been swimming

0:42:19.902 --> 0:42:23.382
<v Speaker 2>in the news cycle for days that do the opposite

0:42:23.622 --> 0:42:27.341
<v Speaker 2>and that will suit me enhich me, make me think

0:42:27.342 --> 0:42:29.502
<v Speaker 2>about things in a different way, but also just soothe

0:42:29.542 --> 0:42:31.821
<v Speaker 2>me and not freak me out. And I think that

0:42:32.781 --> 0:42:34.741
<v Speaker 2>we definitely have gotten wise to it.

0:42:34.982 --> 0:42:36.941
<v Speaker 4>I think it's taken over news. There was a great

0:42:36.942 --> 0:42:39.701
<v Speaker 4>example in that story about the LA fires. How you

0:42:39.701 --> 0:42:42.062
<v Speaker 4>can get a week into a news event, no none

0:42:42.102 --> 0:42:46.781
<v Speaker 4>of the facts, but know the debates about DEI you've

0:42:46.781 --> 0:42:48.582
<v Speaker 4>seen fake images you to.

0:42:48.582 --> 0:42:50.661
<v Speaker 2>Be mad about today yelling it out us.

0:42:51.102 --> 0:42:55.582
<v Speaker 4>We even said it last week with cyclone Alfred when

0:42:55.582 --> 0:42:58.542
<v Speaker 4>we were talking about that, it was a bizarre moment

0:42:58.582 --> 0:43:01.062
<v Speaker 4>because there was nobody to be angry at. Like the

0:43:01.102 --> 0:43:05.221
<v Speaker 4>news cycle relies on going, who can we yell at?

0:43:05.261 --> 0:43:06.501
<v Speaker 4>Because that's a story that.

0:43:06.462 --> 0:43:09.022
<v Speaker 1>The beginning of COVID was like that. Remember when no

0:43:09.062 --> 0:43:10.821
<v Speaker 1>one had an one to be angry at and it

0:43:10.942 --> 0:43:12.982
<v Speaker 1>was just felt strange and people were singing opera on

0:43:13.022 --> 0:43:16.822
<v Speaker 1>their balconies and sharing Kumbaya memes and then we're snaffed.

0:43:16.942 --> 0:43:18.502
<v Speaker 1>Then it got snaffed.

0:43:19.302 --> 0:43:21.942
<v Speaker 3>We devolved into snuff. Our hands got sticky.

0:43:21.542 --> 0:43:22.102
<v Speaker 5>With the snuff.

0:43:22.582 --> 0:43:24.942
<v Speaker 2>That's all we've got time for today. Friends, A massive

0:43:25.022 --> 0:43:27.341
<v Speaker 2>thank you to all of you out louders for listening

0:43:27.342 --> 0:43:29.662
<v Speaker 2>to today's show and to our fabulous team for putting

0:43:29.661 --> 0:43:31.542
<v Speaker 2>it together. As always, we're going to be back in

0:43:31.582 --> 0:43:32.422
<v Speaker 2>your ears tomorrow.

0:43:32.822 --> 0:43:34.622
<v Speaker 3>Goodbye bye.

0:43:35.462 --> 0:43:38.741
<v Speaker 1>Shout out to any Muma Maya subscribers listening. If you

0:43:38.902 --> 0:43:41.222
<v Speaker 1>love the show and want to support us as well,

0:43:41.462 --> 0:43:43.861
<v Speaker 1>subscribing to mom and Maya is the very best way

0:43:43.862 --> 0:43:45.902
<v Speaker 1>to do so. There is a link in the episode

0:43:45.982 --> 0:43:46.382
<v Speaker 1>description