WEBVTT - Esther Perel: When You Choose Your Partner and Lose Your Family

0:00:00.040 --> 0:00:04.280
<v Speaker 1>Whatever the reasons for cutoffs, I think they are among

0:00:04.320 --> 0:00:09.760
<v Speaker 1>the most impactful measures that you can do to a

0:00:09.800 --> 0:00:12.720
<v Speaker 1>family system. And the way I know it is because

0:00:13.280 --> 0:00:15.760
<v Speaker 1>there is not a family that I've worked with that

0:00:15.840 --> 0:00:19.880
<v Speaker 1>when this has happened, even in the generations before, doesn't

0:00:19.880 --> 0:00:22.440
<v Speaker 1>tell it to me within the first three minutes. Hi,

0:00:22.680 --> 0:00:27.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm Kateline brook and my guest today is Esther Perrell.

0:00:28.040 --> 0:00:32.160
<v Speaker 2>Esther is one of the world's most influential relationship therapists.

0:00:32.680 --> 0:00:38.800
<v Speaker 2>She spent decades helping people understand love, desire, marriage, infidelity, intimacy,

0:00:39.440 --> 0:00:43.760
<v Speaker 2>and family. Her books have become international best sellers, Her

0:00:43.800 --> 0:00:47.599
<v Speaker 2>TED talks have been watched by millions, and through her

0:00:47.640 --> 0:00:51.680
<v Speaker 2>podcast Where Should We Begin, she's invited us into the

0:00:51.720 --> 0:00:57.320
<v Speaker 2>private conversations most people only have behind closed doors. What

0:00:57.440 --> 0:01:00.800
<v Speaker 2>makes Esther's work so compelling is that she doesn't just

0:01:00.920 --> 0:01:05.000
<v Speaker 2>talk about relationships. She talks about relationships as a reflection

0:01:05.120 --> 0:01:08.560
<v Speaker 2>of the culture we live in, the families we come from,

0:01:09.160 --> 0:01:12.680
<v Speaker 2>and the people we're trying to become. And lately, there's

0:01:12.720 --> 0:01:16.400
<v Speaker 2>one story that seems to be playing out everywhere. We've

0:01:16.400 --> 0:01:19.960
<v Speaker 2>watched it happen publicly with Brooklyn Beckham and Nicola Pelts

0:01:20.560 --> 0:01:23.880
<v Speaker 2>with Prince Harry and Meghan Markle. An adult child falls

0:01:23.880 --> 0:01:27.160
<v Speaker 2>in love, chooses a partner, and suddenly finds themselves caught

0:01:27.200 --> 0:01:30.600
<v Speaker 2>between the family they came from and the family they're

0:01:30.600 --> 0:01:34.440
<v Speaker 2>trying to build. The details are different, but the tension

0:01:34.680 --> 0:01:39.520
<v Speaker 2>is familiar. What happens when your parents don't approve of

0:01:39.560 --> 0:01:43.559
<v Speaker 2>the person you've chosen, What happens when a partner enters

0:01:43.560 --> 0:01:48.080
<v Speaker 2>a family and changes its dynamics forever? And why can

0:01:48.200 --> 0:01:52.320
<v Speaker 2>choosing the person you love sometimes feel like betraying the

0:01:52.360 --> 0:01:56.320
<v Speaker 2>people who raised you. Today, Esther and I are talking

0:01:56.320 --> 0:02:02.160
<v Speaker 2>about loyalty, family love, estrangement, and what happens when our

0:02:02.240 --> 0:02:10.320
<v Speaker 2>most important relationships collide. This is Esther Parrel, Esther Perel,

0:02:11.720 --> 0:02:12.960
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to No Filter.

0:02:13.360 --> 0:02:16.720
<v Speaker 1>Thank you. It's a great thrill to have you here.

0:02:17.560 --> 0:02:18.919
<v Speaker 1>It's a pleasure for me to be here.

0:02:19.400 --> 0:02:23.480
<v Speaker 2>Well, let us see at the end who's been pleasured.

0:02:24.320 --> 0:02:30.240
<v Speaker 2>But I was thinking about you and really your contribution

0:02:30.520 --> 0:02:37.400
<v Speaker 2>to I think a public analysis of relationships that is

0:02:37.440 --> 0:02:41.000
<v Speaker 2>at once very personal for people. And I was thinking

0:02:41.040 --> 0:02:45.160
<v Speaker 2>about your heritage. You come to us from New York

0:02:45.240 --> 0:02:49.040
<v Speaker 2>but by Belgium, and my dad, who was Dutch, was

0:02:49.120 --> 0:02:53.280
<v Speaker 2>married in Belgium. He married my mum and he would

0:02:53.360 --> 0:02:57.000
<v Speaker 2>always say, oh, the Belgians are very unusual people.

0:02:57.080 --> 0:02:57.520
<v Speaker 1>He said.

0:02:57.919 --> 0:03:01.040
<v Speaker 2>They have the practicality of the Dutch and the romance

0:03:01.080 --> 0:03:05.160
<v Speaker 2>of the French. And I think that that is kind

0:03:05.160 --> 0:03:06.720
<v Speaker 2>of attendant in your work.

0:03:06.919 --> 0:03:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Do you think, But my origins are not Belgian. Oh oh,

0:03:14.639 --> 0:03:16.240
<v Speaker 1>my origins are Polish.

0:03:16.639 --> 0:03:20.760
<v Speaker 2>Ah, so I could probably like post holocausts.

0:03:20.880 --> 0:03:24.760
<v Speaker 1>Yes. So my parents arrived as refugees to Belgium from

0:03:24.800 --> 0:03:29.519
<v Speaker 1>Poland and where refugees for a good five years in

0:03:29.600 --> 0:03:35.600
<v Speaker 1>Belgium until they became nationalized. But I think that the

0:03:35.720 --> 0:03:42.640
<v Speaker 1>metaphor holds. I definitely had the practicality, and I am

0:03:42.640 --> 0:03:45.360
<v Speaker 1>from the Flemish part of Belgium, but I did absorb

0:03:45.440 --> 0:03:48.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the French culture as well as the

0:03:49.120 --> 0:03:54.120
<v Speaker 1>Latin romance part. And now the big difference between Belgium

0:03:54.160 --> 0:03:57.360
<v Speaker 1>and Holland is that one country is Catholic, the other

0:03:57.480 --> 0:04:02.200
<v Speaker 1>is Protestant. Ah. Yes, and that also influences right, yes.

0:04:02.120 --> 0:04:07.280
<v Speaker 2>And because the Catholic have the flambuoyance I guess in

0:04:07.440 --> 0:04:10.560
<v Speaker 2>even in their worship that the Protestants do not have.

0:04:11.080 --> 0:04:16.120
<v Speaker 2>Correct yeah, correct, yeah, quite austere I mean, but Dutch

0:04:16.160 --> 0:04:18.080
<v Speaker 2>people like to go to Belgium when they want to

0:04:18.120 --> 0:04:20.520
<v Speaker 2>go out, Yeah, when they want to have a good time,

0:04:22.000 --> 0:04:24.960
<v Speaker 2>because part of it is about, you know, a certain

0:04:26.480 --> 0:04:32.080
<v Speaker 2>vivre in abundance rather than the more freedom. Yes, so

0:04:32.320 --> 0:04:40.159
<v Speaker 2>you brought I think that freedom to what previously I

0:04:40.160 --> 0:04:42.480
<v Speaker 2>think a lot of people would have thought as as

0:04:42.560 --> 0:04:47.640
<v Speaker 2>quite a dry science, the science of psychotherapy.

0:04:47.960 --> 0:04:50.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I've never thought of psychotherapy as a Drey

0:04:50.560 --> 0:04:53.279
<v Speaker 1>saying say I'm stepped in it. I still am a

0:04:53.320 --> 0:04:58.080
<v Speaker 1>practitioner today. I keep myself close to the craft and

0:04:58.080 --> 0:05:01.400
<v Speaker 1>my feet on the ground, and I think it's an

0:05:01.560 --> 0:05:09.160
<v Speaker 1>endlessly fascinating occupation and preoccupation. So maybe what I have

0:05:09.279 --> 0:05:13.080
<v Speaker 1>done that I was thirty five years in my office,

0:05:13.680 --> 0:05:16.920
<v Speaker 1>and I was teaching and practicing, and I felt at

0:05:16.960 --> 0:05:20.560
<v Speaker 1>a certain moment that I wanted to lower the worlds

0:05:20.600 --> 0:05:23.560
<v Speaker 1>of the office, and I wanted to bring to the

0:05:23.600 --> 0:05:28.320
<v Speaker 1>public the insights, the revelations, the conversations that take place

0:05:28.360 --> 0:05:31.560
<v Speaker 1>in this closed room and that most people have no

0:05:31.800 --> 0:05:36.160
<v Speaker 1>access to. I wanted to also democratize it and bring

0:05:36.200 --> 0:05:38.919
<v Speaker 1>it into the public square. And I did that with

0:05:39.040 --> 0:05:42.159
<v Speaker 1>the podcast Where Should We Begin, which is basically one

0:05:42.240 --> 0:05:48.800
<v Speaker 1>time of anonymous therapy sessions, consultations with couples and individuals

0:05:48.839 --> 0:05:52.000
<v Speaker 1>now as well, kind of you'll be a fly on

0:05:52.040 --> 0:05:55.719
<v Speaker 1>the wall and listening on what other dilemmas of other people,

0:05:56.040 --> 0:05:58.600
<v Speaker 1>because when you listen carefully to them, you will actually

0:05:58.640 --> 0:06:02.719
<v Speaker 1>see yourself. And then I decided not just to lower

0:06:02.760 --> 0:06:04.960
<v Speaker 1>the walls, but then I thought I wanted to get

0:06:05.040 --> 0:06:09.359
<v Speaker 1>out of the office, and I began to speak in

0:06:09.440 --> 0:06:12.680
<v Speaker 1>public and do lectures and tours. They're not lectures, they're

0:06:12.680 --> 0:06:16.640
<v Speaker 1>really interactive experiences. That's how I came to Australia. The

0:06:16.720 --> 0:06:21.560
<v Speaker 1>last time I was on tour here and I went

0:06:21.640 --> 0:06:25.839
<v Speaker 1>to a bunch of different cities and right after the pandemic,

0:06:26.000 --> 0:06:28.720
<v Speaker 1>right when people began to come out of lockdown, and

0:06:28.760 --> 0:06:33.120
<v Speaker 1>it was a most moving experience because for many people

0:06:33.160 --> 0:06:35.440
<v Speaker 1>it was the first time that they were back in

0:06:35.520 --> 0:06:39.320
<v Speaker 1>public and with other papers, with other people. The intimacy

0:06:39.400 --> 0:06:42.320
<v Speaker 1>of that. It was two things. One was for them

0:06:42.360 --> 0:06:46.279
<v Speaker 1>to be back with close by sitting. For so many,

0:06:46.279 --> 0:06:49.800
<v Speaker 1>many years, we had seen every person as a potential contaminant,

0:06:49.880 --> 0:06:53.200
<v Speaker 1>and now we were back, you know, allowing the nervous

0:06:53.200 --> 0:06:55.919
<v Speaker 1>system to let people come close to us and not

0:06:56.080 --> 0:07:00.160
<v Speaker 1>instantly go into a fight or flight. And at the

0:07:00.160 --> 0:07:03.800
<v Speaker 1>same time, I also noticed how much people in Australia

0:07:03.880 --> 0:07:07.200
<v Speaker 1>had listened to where should We Begin during Lovetown to

0:07:07.320 --> 0:07:10.560
<v Speaker 1>the podcast, and so they had a whole relationship with me,

0:07:10.760 --> 0:07:15.120
<v Speaker 1>a parasocial relationship with me where they felt like I

0:07:15.200 --> 0:07:18.560
<v Speaker 1>knew them in some way, and that gave a whole

0:07:18.600 --> 0:07:22.440
<v Speaker 1>different tone to the to the evenings because people had

0:07:22.520 --> 0:07:25.960
<v Speaker 1>questions that are way beyond what are the typical questions

0:07:26.000 --> 0:07:31.720
<v Speaker 1>asked the public talk like what sort of questions. It's

0:07:31.720 --> 0:07:36.920
<v Speaker 1>the question, it's a depth of question. You know if

0:07:37.000 --> 0:07:39.760
<v Speaker 1>I trust you and I know you have a good

0:07:39.840 --> 0:07:41.920
<v Speaker 1>sense of me because I've heard you do it with

0:07:42.120 --> 0:07:45.800
<v Speaker 1>somebody else, and that you understand my dilemma that when

0:07:45.840 --> 0:07:47.720
<v Speaker 1>I ask you should I stay or shall I go?

0:07:48.640 --> 0:07:51.160
<v Speaker 1>Or how do I know that I am not repeating

0:07:51.200 --> 0:07:55.960
<v Speaker 1>a pattern? Or how much can I learn to to

0:07:55.960 --> 0:08:00.480
<v Speaker 1>build trust again when it has been broken? But it's

0:08:00.720 --> 0:08:03.400
<v Speaker 1>the questions, there's the same, but it's the level with

0:08:03.560 --> 0:08:07.080
<v Speaker 1>which a vulnerability with which you ask it because you

0:08:07.120 --> 0:08:10.800
<v Speaker 1>feel that this person in me has come close to you,

0:08:12.280 --> 0:08:15.880
<v Speaker 1>talking to you through another couple who was going through

0:08:15.920 --> 0:08:21.040
<v Speaker 1>the same mejor dilemmas as you because it's almost like.

0:08:22.760 --> 0:08:25.440
<v Speaker 2>Listening, for instance, to you know where should we begin,

0:08:25.560 --> 0:08:30.200
<v Speaker 2>or generally to listening to you speak. The power that

0:08:30.240 --> 0:08:36.440
<v Speaker 2>you have is almost like you're a mind reader. But

0:08:36.720 --> 0:08:40.559
<v Speaker 2>I feel like you're speaking about me and my relationship.

0:08:41.040 --> 0:08:45.160
<v Speaker 2>But hundreds of thousands of other people also feel like

0:08:45.240 --> 0:08:50.000
<v Speaker 2>you're doing that. That's extraordinary, and I do think, beyond

0:08:50.160 --> 0:08:54.360
<v Speaker 2>the science of it and your study of it, that

0:08:54.559 --> 0:08:59.840
<v Speaker 2>it is some kind of gift. When did you realize

0:09:00.080 --> 0:09:09.920
<v Speaker 2>that you had an understanding of humans beyond textbook?

0:09:10.800 --> 0:09:15.280
<v Speaker 1>I would say around twelve oh ten twelve oh Quite early.

0:09:16.000 --> 0:09:22.080
<v Speaker 1>I was fascinated with understanding people. I came from a

0:09:22.080 --> 0:09:32.280
<v Speaker 1>community of people who had experienced massive trauma, collective trauma, displacement, destitution, annihilation, extermination, etc.

0:09:32.880 --> 0:09:35.959
<v Speaker 1>And I just I was very interested in who are

0:09:36.040 --> 0:09:38.800
<v Speaker 1>these people that are around me that have lived things,

0:09:38.800 --> 0:09:45.280
<v Speaker 1>including my parents, that are no words for I saw them,

0:09:46.120 --> 0:09:48.600
<v Speaker 1>and I saw those who be treated from life, and

0:09:48.640 --> 0:09:53.320
<v Speaker 1>I saw those who kind of grabbed life at its fullest,

0:09:53.360 --> 0:09:56.040
<v Speaker 1>and I wondered what makes one person go in this

0:09:56.200 --> 0:10:01.040
<v Speaker 1>direction and what makes other people react differently. I saw

0:10:01.080 --> 0:10:05.160
<v Speaker 1>their reactions to their children, to to how much they

0:10:05.200 --> 0:10:09.880
<v Speaker 1>trusted the world, or were hyper vigilant. I felt all

0:10:09.920 --> 0:10:11.880
<v Speaker 1>of these things, and then I and then I saw

0:10:11.920 --> 0:10:15.600
<v Speaker 1>the kids us, you know, and and then I got

0:10:15.600 --> 0:10:20.800
<v Speaker 1>interested in romantic relationships because I was tipped into the

0:10:20.840 --> 0:10:24.640
<v Speaker 1>French world and poetry and the songs and the films

0:10:24.679 --> 0:10:28.000
<v Speaker 1>and that whole thing. And so I would say, very

0:10:28.080 --> 0:10:31.120
<v Speaker 1>early on, as a teenager, an early adolescent, I was

0:10:31.240 --> 0:10:36.079
<v Speaker 1>interested in relationships, in studying relationships and looking at relationships

0:10:36.080 --> 0:10:41.400
<v Speaker 1>across cultures, and looking at how people navigate different cultural

0:10:41.480 --> 0:10:46.160
<v Speaker 1>codes in their relationships. And very early on I came

0:10:46.280 --> 0:10:51.480
<v Speaker 1>up with this trede also to speak that I they

0:10:51.520 --> 0:10:54.840
<v Speaker 1>would say, the quality of your relationships determines the quality

0:10:54.880 --> 0:10:59.200
<v Speaker 1>of your life. Yes, and that has stayed. I probably

0:10:59.200 --> 0:11:01.960
<v Speaker 1>didn't express it in those words back then, but it

0:11:02.200 --> 0:11:05.360
<v Speaker 1>actually became my way of living and also my way

0:11:05.880 --> 0:11:09.160
<v Speaker 1>of what I can offer two people. Because also your

0:11:09.280 --> 0:11:15.760
<v Speaker 1>timing has been extraordinary, because I think people have never

0:11:15.800 --> 0:11:22.040
<v Speaker 1>felt more isolated, even though we're supposedly more connected, and

0:11:22.080 --> 0:11:26.600
<v Speaker 1>there's a real hunger for people to understand as things change,

0:11:27.000 --> 0:11:31.160
<v Speaker 1>and as our cultural norms have changed, how to still

0:11:31.240 --> 0:11:33.880
<v Speaker 1>connect with that part of your humanity, which is that

0:11:33.960 --> 0:11:36.120
<v Speaker 1>you want to be loved and you want to love.

0:11:37.200 --> 0:11:42.080
<v Speaker 1>So I would say that the actual turning point is

0:11:42.160 --> 0:11:47.400
<v Speaker 1>before that. It's before modern loneliness. It starts with when

0:11:47.480 --> 0:11:51.360
<v Speaker 1>I wrote Meeting in Captivity, right, which was this year

0:11:51.440 --> 0:11:54.240
<v Speaker 1>is its twentiethniverse two thousand and six, yesh, and so

0:11:54.480 --> 0:11:58.400
<v Speaker 1>we are celebrating the twentieth diniversity and of relation captivity

0:11:58.520 --> 0:12:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Meeting in Captivity, and that was a book that really

0:12:03.679 --> 0:12:07.120
<v Speaker 1>questions some of our fundamental assumptions about what are the

0:12:07.160 --> 0:12:11.600
<v Speaker 1>expectations that we bring to modern love. How do we

0:12:11.640 --> 0:12:15.360
<v Speaker 1>grapple with these contradictions, What is the relationship between love

0:12:15.440 --> 0:12:19.760
<v Speaker 1>and desire? What does it mean to have a relationship

0:12:19.760 --> 0:12:22.280
<v Speaker 1>in a world where sexuality is no longer because you

0:12:22.320 --> 0:12:25.520
<v Speaker 1>want to have multiple children, nor because it's exclusively a

0:12:25.559 --> 0:12:29.280
<v Speaker 1>woman's marital duty, but it is rooted in pleasure and connection?

0:12:30.320 --> 0:12:32.040
<v Speaker 1>And how do you do that for the long haul?

0:12:32.600 --> 0:12:34.440
<v Speaker 1>And what does the long haul mean when it gets

0:12:34.480 --> 0:12:37.880
<v Speaker 1>twice as long as it used to be? So all

0:12:37.920 --> 0:12:42.080
<v Speaker 1>these questions, what happens to a generation of people who

0:12:42.080 --> 0:12:45.319
<v Speaker 1>have permission like they've never had before, but don't really

0:12:45.360 --> 0:12:48.000
<v Speaker 1>feel like they want it. They would want to want,

0:12:48.080 --> 0:12:51.880
<v Speaker 1>and they don't know why they don't erotically speaking, not

0:12:52.000 --> 0:12:54.400
<v Speaker 1>just secually, in terms of the life as they bring

0:12:54.440 --> 0:12:58.880
<v Speaker 1>to their relationships. So that was the first part of this.

0:12:59.360 --> 0:13:04.280
<v Speaker 1>That's long for social media, that's long before smartphones, et cetera.

0:13:04.800 --> 0:13:10.000
<v Speaker 1>Then I think things begin to shift. People begin to

0:13:10.120 --> 0:13:15.280
<v Speaker 1>a gradual retreat from relationships. And I would for me

0:13:15.679 --> 0:13:20.840
<v Speaker 1>this is really a tipping point during the pandemic. The

0:13:20.880 --> 0:13:27.920
<v Speaker 1>pandemic imposed a level of isolation that slowly became an

0:13:28.040 --> 0:13:30.160
<v Speaker 1>unmet level of loneliness.

0:13:31.559 --> 0:13:36.680
<v Speaker 3>And then the extrapolation of that is wash is that

0:13:37.679 --> 0:13:42.640
<v Speaker 3>more and more people began to lose their social skills,

0:13:43.240 --> 0:13:46.239
<v Speaker 3>that there is a massive social atrophy.

0:13:46.640 --> 0:13:49.800
<v Speaker 1>When you don't use a muscle, the muscle atrophies. It

0:13:49.920 --> 0:13:53.240
<v Speaker 1>is no different in our social life when you don't

0:13:53.280 --> 0:13:56.280
<v Speaker 1>talk to people, when you don't reach out. When you

0:13:56.400 --> 0:13:59.480
<v Speaker 1>begin to live a contactless life where you don't need

0:13:59.520 --> 0:14:03.079
<v Speaker 1>to leave your house, whether it's to work or to eat,

0:14:03.360 --> 0:14:07.719
<v Speaker 1>or to shop or to exercise, but you live primarily

0:14:07.800 --> 0:14:12.720
<v Speaker 1>in a state of domestic gravity and enforced presentism for

0:14:13.120 --> 0:14:18.480
<v Speaker 1>a long time, you start to have a harder time

0:14:18.600 --> 0:14:22.640
<v Speaker 1>going out and reaching out again. You don't remember it,

0:14:23.160 --> 0:14:26.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's exactly actually what people used to experience

0:14:26.480 --> 0:14:29.840
<v Speaker 1>when they began to come out of lockdown. At the

0:14:29.920 --> 0:14:34.360
<v Speaker 1>same time as you are socially retreated, you are also

0:14:34.680 --> 0:14:41.280
<v Speaker 1>digitally more connected. Yes, modern loneliness masks itself as hyper connectivity.

0:14:41.960 --> 0:14:45.640
<v Speaker 1>It isn't that people don't have connections, but they lack debt.

0:14:46.760 --> 0:14:51.000
<v Speaker 2>And is it also that, for instance, because of our

0:14:51.040 --> 0:14:55.520
<v Speaker 2>digital connection, that we're getting those rapid dopamine heats that

0:14:55.600 --> 0:14:59.960
<v Speaker 2>once we would get from contact with another person socially

0:15:00.200 --> 0:15:04.040
<v Speaker 2>or romantically. So with that part of our brain is

0:15:04.080 --> 0:15:09.239
<v Speaker 2>cited if we do what if we are digitally online,

0:15:09.320 --> 0:15:12.800
<v Speaker 2>we feel like our brain feels like it's getting that

0:15:14.200 --> 0:15:16.840
<v Speaker 2>reward that once upon a time you would have to

0:15:17.400 --> 0:15:18.760
<v Speaker 2>get from another person.

0:15:18.920 --> 0:15:23.520
<v Speaker 1>So everything changed. In two thousand and nine, two buttons

0:15:23.560 --> 0:15:29.320
<v Speaker 1>were created, the like button and the algorithm that was

0:15:29.400 --> 0:15:33.160
<v Speaker 1>going to feed you things according to what you had

0:15:33.200 --> 0:15:37.560
<v Speaker 1>been hitting on before. Right, those two buttons pretty much

0:15:37.560 --> 0:15:41.480
<v Speaker 1>have changed the social landscape, and that includes how the

0:15:41.520 --> 0:15:44.480
<v Speaker 1>brain responds to the kind of interactions that we seek.

0:15:45.160 --> 0:15:52.320
<v Speaker 1>We became even more comparative. We also became even more performative.

0:15:53.440 --> 0:15:56.360
<v Speaker 1>What we you know, people have performed forever. This is

0:15:56.400 --> 0:15:58.880
<v Speaker 1>not a new behavior. People performed on the steps of

0:15:58.880 --> 0:16:02.280
<v Speaker 1>a church. You know, people brought their best suit out

0:16:02.320 --> 0:16:06.360
<v Speaker 1>on a Sunday morning. But the speed with it, the

0:16:06.440 --> 0:16:10.680
<v Speaker 1>absolute scale, you know, for me, for so long, a

0:16:10.760 --> 0:16:13.200
<v Speaker 1>scale was something you stand on and don't get good news.

0:16:13.280 --> 0:16:17.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, this concept of scaling of massa of accumulation,

0:16:19.400 --> 0:16:24.600
<v Speaker 1>that made a big difference. You can have a thousand

0:16:24.680 --> 0:16:28.600
<v Speaker 1>virtual friends, but nobody to feed your cat. There is

0:16:28.640 --> 0:16:33.680
<v Speaker 1>a line that I have used often because everyone gets it.

0:16:33.680 --> 0:16:37.040
<v Speaker 1>It's like, what is the difference between friends and friendship?

0:16:39.560 --> 0:16:45.480
<v Speaker 2>And as you're traveling the world now speaking to people,

0:16:46.640 --> 0:16:52.400
<v Speaker 2>what is the overriding sense of what they are seeking

0:16:52.680 --> 0:16:53.320
<v Speaker 2>from you?

0:16:54.160 --> 0:16:56.120
<v Speaker 1>It has become okay, let me put it like this.

0:16:56.480 --> 0:17:00.680
<v Speaker 1>If I have in the palm of my hand advice

0:17:01.240 --> 0:17:05.920
<v Speaker 1>that gives me straightforward answers what to do, where to go,

0:17:06.080 --> 0:17:08.280
<v Speaker 1>what to eat, how to get there, what to listen to,

0:17:08.320 --> 0:17:13.160
<v Speaker 1>what to watch, and takes away all doubt, all experimentation,

0:17:14.080 --> 0:17:21.240
<v Speaker 1>all mistakes, all serendipity, all uncertainty, all unexpected, all adventure,

0:17:21.680 --> 0:17:26.800
<v Speaker 1>all adventure. Then I begin to expect a certain predictability

0:17:27.840 --> 0:17:31.240
<v Speaker 1>in life and perfection for that matter. That makes it

0:17:31.320 --> 0:17:35.399
<v Speaker 1>much harder for me to deal with the uncertainty that

0:17:35.560 --> 0:17:38.119
<v Speaker 1>is at this point at a core of our existence.

0:17:38.240 --> 0:17:41.240
<v Speaker 1>Not that we haven't had uncertainty before, but we used

0:17:41.240 --> 0:17:43.120
<v Speaker 1>to live we used to know how to live with it,

0:17:43.359 --> 0:17:47.000
<v Speaker 1>and we had a whole set of institutions that helped

0:17:47.040 --> 0:17:51.320
<v Speaker 1>us deal with the unpredictable and the uncertain and the unknown.

0:17:51.520 --> 0:17:56.080
<v Speaker 1>It was called primarily religion, and then social institutions, and

0:17:56.119 --> 0:18:00.760
<v Speaker 1>then community and rituals. All these things helped us to

0:18:00.840 --> 0:18:04.120
<v Speaker 1>deal with the fact that we didn't control many things.

0:18:04.320 --> 0:18:06.399
<v Speaker 1>But now that we have a device that seems to

0:18:06.560 --> 0:18:09.639
<v Speaker 1>be able to control everything, we have become even less

0:18:09.680 --> 0:18:14.879
<v Speaker 1>capable of dealing with ambiguity, with complexity, with uncertainty. And

0:18:14.920 --> 0:18:18.200
<v Speaker 1>they come to me and they ask me questions that

0:18:18.200 --> 0:18:20.960
<v Speaker 1>they have sat with, sometimes for a long time, but

0:18:21.040 --> 0:18:23.720
<v Speaker 1>they would like for me to be able to answer

0:18:23.760 --> 0:18:27.040
<v Speaker 1>it in a way that would take away that ambiguity

0:18:27.200 --> 0:18:31.200
<v Speaker 1>and uncertainty. That's one piece. I think people have questions

0:18:31.240 --> 0:18:35.080
<v Speaker 1>about where is technology taking us. People have questions about

0:18:35.520 --> 0:18:38.000
<v Speaker 1>how much do you have to remain loyal and dutiful

0:18:38.080 --> 0:18:41.760
<v Speaker 1>to your family when your family doesn't treat you well. Yes,

0:18:41.880 --> 0:18:44.960
<v Speaker 1>I think people come to me with questions about what

0:18:45.080 --> 0:18:47.719
<v Speaker 1>do you do when inside a relationship there are different

0:18:47.760 --> 0:18:53.000
<v Speaker 1>world views, political stances, approaches to nature, broach just to

0:18:53.080 --> 0:18:57.240
<v Speaker 1>religion that seem to make it impossible. Can you still

0:18:57.280 --> 0:19:00.800
<v Speaker 1>be with somebody who sees the world fundamentally different from you.

0:19:01.440 --> 0:19:03.600
<v Speaker 1>People come to me wanting to know if they should

0:19:03.640 --> 0:19:06.199
<v Speaker 1>leave or if they should stay. People come to me

0:19:06.240 --> 0:19:08.639
<v Speaker 1>wanting to know if they met the right person. Wow.

0:19:08.880 --> 0:19:13.399
<v Speaker 1>People come to me to know how should they relate

0:19:13.440 --> 0:19:17.520
<v Speaker 1>to the person that betrayed them? And can trust be rebuilt?

0:19:17.720 --> 0:19:19.359
<v Speaker 1>And how do they deal with the fact that they

0:19:19.400 --> 0:19:22.919
<v Speaker 1>no longer trust their own perception. People come to me

0:19:23.400 --> 0:19:27.879
<v Speaker 1>with all the questions that people ask themselves, because sometimes

0:19:27.920 --> 0:19:32.600
<v Speaker 1>they want a language to basically articulate that which they

0:19:32.720 --> 0:19:34.840
<v Speaker 1>sense but cannot put into words.

0:19:35.359 --> 0:19:39.399
<v Speaker 2>And sometimes I imagine that they need someone who has

0:19:39.880 --> 0:19:43.439
<v Speaker 2>replies the role of friend that they might not necessarily have.

0:19:43.520 --> 0:19:45.240
<v Speaker 2>You're the person who can feed the cat.

0:19:46.760 --> 0:19:50.000
<v Speaker 1>No, I don't. I'm not faking. I don't feed the cat.

0:19:50.040 --> 0:19:52.359
<v Speaker 1>And I'm not a friend, not your friend. But I

0:19:52.400 --> 0:19:57.120
<v Speaker 1>will help you know how to make friends. I will

0:19:57.160 --> 0:20:01.439
<v Speaker 1>guide you to make contact. You know, a stranger is

0:20:01.480 --> 0:20:05.040
<v Speaker 1>often the best friend you haven't yet met. How to

0:20:05.080 --> 0:20:07.720
<v Speaker 1>talk to people again, how to stand in a queue.

0:20:08.680 --> 0:20:08.919
<v Speaker 2>You know.

0:20:09.200 --> 0:20:11.840
<v Speaker 1>Yesterday when I landed, I was waiting for the uber

0:20:11.960 --> 0:20:14.280
<v Speaker 1>and a young woman was standing in front of me

0:20:14.400 --> 0:20:17.159
<v Speaker 1>and she heard me leave a message to someone and

0:20:17.200 --> 0:20:19.600
<v Speaker 1>she turned around and she started talking and we had

0:20:19.600 --> 0:20:21.600
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of a chatter. You here first time,

0:20:21.680 --> 0:20:25.200
<v Speaker 1>Yes I am No, I'm not. And I just told myself, Wow,

0:20:25.800 --> 0:20:31.520
<v Speaker 1>this is becoming an exception. This is not right. Disengagement,

0:20:31.560 --> 0:20:35.480
<v Speaker 1>This engagement, you know, rather than everybody with their face down.

0:20:35.640 --> 0:20:38.280
<v Speaker 1>And it was so nice because we had a long queue.

0:20:38.440 --> 0:20:40.040
<v Speaker 1>I learned a lot of things. She learned a lot

0:20:40.080 --> 0:20:43.879
<v Speaker 1>of things. But it is no longer a given. I

0:20:43.920 --> 0:20:46.560
<v Speaker 1>went to the gym last week and somebody saw that

0:20:46.600 --> 0:20:49.119
<v Speaker 1>I was struggling with the machine and he offered to help.

0:20:49.400 --> 0:20:51.720
<v Speaker 1>And we started this whole conversation about the bright use

0:20:51.760 --> 0:20:53.560
<v Speaker 1>of the machine and how often do we do it,

0:20:53.600 --> 0:20:56.480
<v Speaker 1>And then he said, you know, everybody else is with

0:20:56.520 --> 0:20:58.640
<v Speaker 1>their phone as they're sitting on the machine, and they're

0:20:58.640 --> 0:21:01.440
<v Speaker 1>not even sharing the thing with you. And I said,

0:21:01.640 --> 0:21:04.520
<v Speaker 1>this is so nice, And I said I don't have

0:21:04.600 --> 0:21:07.399
<v Speaker 1>that often enough that somebody just you know, shows me

0:21:07.480 --> 0:21:10.680
<v Speaker 1>how to do this better, correct me, you know, without

0:21:10.720 --> 0:21:13.640
<v Speaker 1>having to flirshing. No no, I was talking about how

0:21:13.640 --> 0:21:16.960
<v Speaker 1>his wife is doing this. It was it was No,

0:21:17.240 --> 0:21:20.720
<v Speaker 1>that's the nice thing. It was just a bunch of

0:21:20.720 --> 0:21:24.200
<v Speaker 1>people who are all training there. It's the fact that

0:21:24.320 --> 0:21:28.560
<v Speaker 1>the spontaneity of it, the serendipity of it, is no

0:21:28.640 --> 0:21:33.040
<v Speaker 1>longer just an obvious thing. It's it's you notice it

0:21:33.320 --> 0:21:35.120
<v Speaker 1>and you have to go out of your why now

0:21:35.280 --> 0:21:37.679
<v Speaker 1>to create it. That but also when you are the

0:21:37.720 --> 0:21:41.560
<v Speaker 1>recipient of it, you realize, oh my god, I don't

0:21:41.600 --> 0:21:43.960
<v Speaker 1>get this so often anymore. I used to. This used

0:21:43.960 --> 0:21:46.280
<v Speaker 1>to be part of my daily life. I talked to

0:21:46.359 --> 0:21:48.800
<v Speaker 1>people on the subway, I talk to people at the

0:21:49.240 --> 0:21:51.359
<v Speaker 1>just as you went to the er a movie or

0:21:51.400 --> 0:21:52.880
<v Speaker 1>came out of a movie. What did you think?

0:21:52.920 --> 0:21:53.080
<v Speaker 2>You know?

0:21:53.160 --> 0:21:57.719
<v Speaker 1>You just that kind of what I would call a

0:21:57.720 --> 0:22:02.960
<v Speaker 1>social social lubricant is not present. So then everything starts

0:22:03.000 --> 0:22:05.280
<v Speaker 1>to feel like it's an unusual effort.

0:22:05.480 --> 0:22:10.520
<v Speaker 2>Yes, and then you become suspicious of any encounter because

0:22:10.520 --> 0:22:15.400
<v Speaker 2>you're so unused to it, and the foreign feels somehow

0:22:16.520 --> 0:22:17.280
<v Speaker 2>too peculiar.

0:22:18.240 --> 0:22:25.520
<v Speaker 1>Yes, it's the unknown, the mystery, the discovery, the exploration,

0:22:27.080 --> 0:22:30.120
<v Speaker 1>the pull towards you know, what else is here? That's

0:22:31.000 --> 0:22:35.160
<v Speaker 1>the risk taking. Everybody is very focused on the safety

0:22:36.080 --> 0:22:38.760
<v Speaker 1>and the risk taking which is part of a lifeness

0:22:38.800 --> 0:22:46.879
<v Speaker 1>and creativity and connection and playfulness, is really suffering after

0:22:46.920 --> 0:22:50.479
<v Speaker 1>the break Esther Perel discusses the dynamics of bringing a

0:22:50.520 --> 0:22:52.320
<v Speaker 1>new partner into the family.

0:22:54.520 --> 0:22:57.439
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I have questions, yes, and I have a question

0:22:57.480 --> 0:23:02.040
<v Speaker 2>about I think very often there'll be a moment, a

0:23:02.040 --> 0:23:08.040
<v Speaker 2>cultural moment that resonates with people like broadly, and I

0:23:08.080 --> 0:23:12.320
<v Speaker 2>think that it probably reflects questions that we have in

0:23:12.359 --> 0:23:16.720
<v Speaker 2>ourselves about our lives, or there's it's some kind of touchstone,

0:23:16.880 --> 0:23:22.239
<v Speaker 2>and one of those is to do with family, and

0:23:22.280 --> 0:23:25.639
<v Speaker 2>it's to do I mean, there's quite a few examples,

0:23:25.680 --> 0:23:29.320
<v Speaker 2>but top of mind at the moment is Brooklyn Beckham

0:23:29.480 --> 0:23:34.280
<v Speaker 2>and his wife Nikola Peltz and for instance, Harry Prince,

0:23:34.320 --> 0:23:37.879
<v Speaker 2>Harry and his wife Megan. And it's to do with

0:23:39.240 --> 0:23:44.000
<v Speaker 2>when you have fallen in love with someone and your

0:23:44.080 --> 0:23:53.240
<v Speaker 2>family doesn't approve, and conversely when you and the opposite, right, So.

0:23:54.920 --> 0:23:57.760
<v Speaker 1>What was it meaning? Well, the opposite meaning that either

0:23:57.840 --> 0:23:59.120
<v Speaker 1>your family doesn't.

0:23:58.880 --> 0:23:59.840
<v Speaker 2>Like the other time.

0:24:00.080 --> 0:24:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Yes, some questions about that.

0:24:03.040 --> 0:24:08.399
<v Speaker 2>In particular, what is it that's so triggering in a

0:24:08.480 --> 0:24:13.960
<v Speaker 2>family when as a foreign a foreigner comes in which

0:24:14.000 --> 0:24:16.600
<v Speaker 2>anyone sort of is brought into the family. Faulty is

0:24:16.640 --> 0:24:19.240
<v Speaker 2>I guess to a certain extent, but they pull against

0:24:19.280 --> 0:24:23.200
<v Speaker 2>the moras of the family. Why do you think that's

0:24:23.240 --> 0:24:27.920
<v Speaker 2>invoked such a strong reaction? Like worldwide and a curiosity?

0:24:28.040 --> 0:24:31.600
<v Speaker 2>What is it that is that we find so fascinating

0:24:31.640 --> 0:24:32.120
<v Speaker 2>about that?

0:24:32.560 --> 0:24:35.560
<v Speaker 1>And we'd like to start from two places, and I

0:24:35.640 --> 0:24:39.760
<v Speaker 1>know which one. Number one. There is nothing that is

0:24:39.840 --> 0:24:45.240
<v Speaker 1>more impactful on a family or on a relational system

0:24:45.480 --> 0:24:50.520
<v Speaker 1>in general than the addition and substraction of new members

0:24:50.760 --> 0:24:57.760
<v Speaker 1>birds marriages. That's more people, less people is the stuff

0:24:57.800 --> 0:25:02.439
<v Speaker 1>that has the most impact on a family, period. So

0:25:03.080 --> 0:25:06.160
<v Speaker 1>that question that you're asking me needs to be put

0:25:06.200 --> 0:25:11.639
<v Speaker 1>in that context. How the family absorbs the loss or

0:25:11.720 --> 0:25:15.600
<v Speaker 1>absorbs the addition of the new person is the question

0:25:15.680 --> 0:25:18.880
<v Speaker 1>that you're asking. So I spent the first twenty years

0:25:18.880 --> 0:25:24.560
<v Speaker 1>of my career working with mixed families, interracial, intracultural, into

0:25:24.600 --> 0:25:28.560
<v Speaker 1>religious couples and families. So I was steeped in the

0:25:28.640 --> 0:25:32.919
<v Speaker 1>subject of families that we're having all kinds of reactions

0:25:33.240 --> 0:25:36.800
<v Speaker 1>to the foreigner in our midst so to speak, not

0:25:36.880 --> 0:25:40.679
<v Speaker 1>just because of immigration, but it could be religion, it

0:25:40.720 --> 0:25:43.720
<v Speaker 1>could be culture, It could be class, it could be

0:25:44.200 --> 0:25:47.399
<v Speaker 1>anything that wasn't part of the endogamous model of that group,

0:25:48.200 --> 0:25:51.639
<v Speaker 1>and many groups have practiced various forms of endogamy in

0:25:51.800 --> 0:25:56.280
<v Speaker 1>group marriage. So when does the person become a threat

0:25:57.080 --> 0:26:01.040
<v Speaker 1>to our cohesiveness, to what we think is our way

0:26:01.080 --> 0:26:04.280
<v Speaker 1>of doing things. How much will we need to change

0:26:04.320 --> 0:26:08.280
<v Speaker 1>for this person that is not what we expected from you.

0:26:10.520 --> 0:26:13.840
<v Speaker 1>It's a betrayal if you marry or if you go

0:26:13.880 --> 0:26:17.399
<v Speaker 1>and live with someone who is outside of the boundaries

0:26:17.400 --> 0:26:22.600
<v Speaker 1>of what we have decided is acceptable. So that's on

0:26:22.640 --> 0:26:24.720
<v Speaker 1>the part of the family, and then on the part

0:26:24.760 --> 0:26:29.040
<v Speaker 1>of the person. It is the battle, maybe not the battle,

0:26:29.080 --> 0:26:36.520
<v Speaker 1>but the tension between loyalty and individual freedom. Individual freedom

0:26:36.640 --> 0:26:40.520
<v Speaker 1>is I choose whoever I want. Love is a free

0:26:40.600 --> 0:26:46.000
<v Speaker 1>choice enterprise. I decide who I choose to be with

0:26:46.119 --> 0:26:52.200
<v Speaker 1>and to make my life with. And that value stands

0:26:52.240 --> 0:26:56.240
<v Speaker 1>in conflict with the value that even in families where

0:26:56.240 --> 0:26:59.920
<v Speaker 1>there is no arranged marriage, there has been an implicit

0:27:00.160 --> 0:27:03.640
<v Speaker 1>sense of what would be the acceptable marriage for the tribe,

0:27:03.800 --> 0:27:06.439
<v Speaker 1>for the family first, and then for the community and

0:27:06.480 --> 0:27:08.840
<v Speaker 1>for the tribe, but certainly for the family. The fact

0:27:08.840 --> 0:27:11.720
<v Speaker 1>that we you know, it is the battle of romanticism

0:27:11.920 --> 0:27:17.320
<v Speaker 1>with tradition. Tradition meant relationships are not a free choice thing.

0:27:18.280 --> 0:27:21.639
<v Speaker 1>You go and you stay within your class, within your group,

0:27:21.720 --> 0:27:24.960
<v Speaker 1>within your you know whatever other values that have been

0:27:25.920 --> 0:27:31.360
<v Speaker 1>deemed as chosen by your family. And what has changed

0:27:31.359 --> 0:27:34.800
<v Speaker 1>today is that more and more the notion of individual

0:27:34.880 --> 0:27:39.479
<v Speaker 1>freedom has taken precedence. Relationships used to be about duty

0:27:39.520 --> 0:27:43.399
<v Speaker 1>and obligation and loyalty, yes, and today they are about

0:27:43.880 --> 0:27:50.280
<v Speaker 1>free choice and options and personal authenticity. And personal authenticity

0:27:50.359 --> 0:27:53.200
<v Speaker 1>means that I'm going to be true to myself and

0:27:53.240 --> 0:27:56.600
<v Speaker 1>that that may be more important than my connection with

0:27:56.680 --> 0:27:59.879
<v Speaker 1>my family. Now, what do people do. They want a

0:28:00.040 --> 0:28:03.879
<v Speaker 1>family to accept the person they chose. They want the

0:28:03.960 --> 0:28:08.280
<v Speaker 1>family to be gracious, to not be insulting or contemptuous

0:28:08.359 --> 0:28:13.840
<v Speaker 1>or ignoring. They want recognition for their own identity and

0:28:13.920 --> 0:28:16.000
<v Speaker 1>for their own authenticity.

0:28:16.560 --> 0:28:19.679
<v Speaker 2>Right, that's the autonomy too, of yes, And the autonomy

0:28:19.680 --> 0:28:22.640
<v Speaker 2>that comes with the free choice that I choose who

0:28:22.680 --> 0:28:25.720
<v Speaker 2>I love, and who I love is who I choose

0:28:25.760 --> 0:28:27.520
<v Speaker 2>to make a life with marriage or not.

0:28:28.680 --> 0:28:32.959
<v Speaker 1>And you are to accept that. That is a reversal

0:28:33.560 --> 0:28:38.680
<v Speaker 1>of what family life has been organized around across cultures

0:28:39.200 --> 0:28:43.120
<v Speaker 1>for most of history. The family wasn't there to adapt

0:28:43.200 --> 0:28:46.360
<v Speaker 1>to you. You were there to adapt and to adjust

0:28:46.360 --> 0:28:50.680
<v Speaker 1>to the family's expectations. We are at a real crossroads

0:28:50.720 --> 0:28:51.520
<v Speaker 1>in that level.

0:28:51.600 --> 0:28:54.400
<v Speaker 2>On that level, and if someone has been brought into

0:28:54.440 --> 0:28:58.000
<v Speaker 2>the family, which and I know many families in which

0:28:58.040 --> 0:29:02.280
<v Speaker 2>this is the case, someone who is like trying a

0:29:02.360 --> 0:29:09.480
<v Speaker 2>grenade into the family by maybe just by virtue of

0:29:09.520 --> 0:29:13.320
<v Speaker 2>who they are, or maybe by intent, what can the

0:29:13.360 --> 0:29:20.160
<v Speaker 2>family do to accommodate that and to not alienate the

0:29:20.200 --> 0:29:22.120
<v Speaker 2>person that loves the person.

0:29:22.880 --> 0:29:25.840
<v Speaker 1>But what I ask the family first and foremost is

0:29:26.000 --> 0:29:28.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I do a lot of work around family estrangement,

0:29:28.880 --> 0:29:32.800
<v Speaker 1>have done. But the first question is what is important

0:29:32.840 --> 0:29:39.080
<v Speaker 1>to you to maintain your continuity, your identity, your cohesiveness,

0:29:39.760 --> 0:29:43.120
<v Speaker 1>or to maintain contact with your child. Depending on what

0:29:43.160 --> 0:29:45.360
<v Speaker 1>you answer me, I may have an idea of what

0:29:45.400 --> 0:29:48.440
<v Speaker 1>you need to do. Those are two very different programs.

0:29:49.520 --> 0:29:53.120
<v Speaker 1>You want to you want to see your kid again,

0:29:53.400 --> 0:29:56.800
<v Speaker 1>You want to see your grandchildren again, if there ever

0:29:56.920 --> 0:30:01.479
<v Speaker 1>are any, or you want to be at first because

0:30:01.520 --> 0:30:04.440
<v Speaker 1>you said not over my dead body, or your grandmother

0:30:04.480 --> 0:30:07.480
<v Speaker 1>would roll around in her grave, or you know, and

0:30:08.040 --> 0:30:11.240
<v Speaker 1>that level of continuity is more important to you than

0:30:11.560 --> 0:30:14.760
<v Speaker 1>harmony in the family, and it's not for me to

0:30:14.800 --> 0:30:20.040
<v Speaker 1>make that decision. Now, that's provided that the various members

0:30:20.080 --> 0:30:23.120
<v Speaker 1>of the family agree. Most of the time, when a

0:30:23.160 --> 0:30:26.760
<v Speaker 1>grenade is thrown, there is a role distribution inside the

0:30:26.800 --> 0:30:29.120
<v Speaker 1>family about the reactions to the grenade.

0:30:29.280 --> 0:30:35.320
<v Speaker 2>Yes, okay, so mu's impossible to not really, that's a normal,

0:30:35.600 --> 0:30:39.440
<v Speaker 2>totally expected enormal. So one person is, you know, intent

0:30:39.560 --> 0:30:42.719
<v Speaker 2>on going frontal with the grenade. One person is becoming

0:30:42.760 --> 0:30:44.960
<v Speaker 2>the diplomat. One becomes the facilitator.

0:30:45.000 --> 0:30:47.720
<v Speaker 1>One becomes the one who says, you can all have

0:30:47.800 --> 0:30:50.360
<v Speaker 1>a party without me, you know, have your own drama.

0:30:50.440 --> 0:30:52.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm out of this. One goes on the site and

0:30:52.640 --> 0:30:55.640
<v Speaker 1>has secret conversations with the people who've been shunned. One

0:30:55.680 --> 0:30:58.760
<v Speaker 1>gives money which the other one doesn't know. You know,

0:30:59.040 --> 0:31:04.480
<v Speaker 1>this is actually really not new. It's just that the

0:31:04.520 --> 0:31:07.800
<v Speaker 1>actual declaration is more official at this moment.

0:31:07.920 --> 0:31:14.800
<v Speaker 2>And in a family, if you have very painful by

0:31:14.800 --> 0:31:16.960
<v Speaker 2>the way, yes, it's I think it's important to say.

0:31:16.960 --> 0:31:20.920
<v Speaker 1>It's that these things are not done lightly, and they

0:31:20.920 --> 0:31:25.280
<v Speaker 1>are usually not instant. It's not like, you know, the

0:31:25.360 --> 0:31:28.680
<v Speaker 1>moment you brought the person that was the grenade. Things

0:31:28.760 --> 0:31:33.280
<v Speaker 1>it's been brewing. It's very slight. One ignoring, one indifference,

0:31:33.520 --> 0:31:38.480
<v Speaker 1>one contempt. There's layers and layers of accumulation, and then

0:31:38.520 --> 0:31:41.120
<v Speaker 1>at one point something is done and that becomes the

0:31:41.160 --> 0:31:43.400
<v Speaker 1>breaking point on one side or the other. I think

0:31:43.480 --> 0:31:46.280
<v Speaker 1>that's very important. It's not people usually what happened, and

0:31:46.320 --> 0:31:49.240
<v Speaker 1>they give you the last thing. No, that last thing

0:31:49.560 --> 0:31:52.760
<v Speaker 1>sits on the law, the camel's backs, the straw.

0:31:52.920 --> 0:31:56.280
<v Speaker 2>Yes. But you know, I also i'd be curious to

0:31:56.320 --> 0:32:02.400
<v Speaker 2>know how often the protagonists in this are women, because

0:32:02.480 --> 0:32:04.320
<v Speaker 2>I have a theory.

0:32:04.560 --> 0:32:08.800
<v Speaker 1>I'll be interested in women that are the partners of Yes,

0:32:08.920 --> 0:32:11.320
<v Speaker 1>the women who are very.

0:32:13.200 --> 0:32:16.880
<v Speaker 2>Acutely aware of the slides where sometimes I think two

0:32:16.920 --> 0:32:18.880
<v Speaker 2>women can be going to war in a room and

0:32:18.920 --> 0:32:22.040
<v Speaker 2>the men will be oblivious, Whereas I think women have

0:32:22.080 --> 0:32:25.880
<v Speaker 2>a very nuanced way and a rating of things.

0:32:25.680 --> 0:32:27.800
<v Speaker 1>And so they going to say to their partner, look,

0:32:27.840 --> 0:32:30.880
<v Speaker 1>you're being mistreated, that are being unfair to you. You've

0:32:30.920 --> 0:32:34.120
<v Speaker 1>never seen how they favored your brother. They give them

0:32:34.520 --> 0:32:37.920
<v Speaker 1>an analysis of the relational map, the hidden map of

0:32:38.000 --> 0:32:41.440
<v Speaker 1>the family, and how you've been taken advantage of and

0:32:41.520 --> 0:32:43.560
<v Speaker 1>you didn't know, and I'm going to correct that for you.

0:32:44.080 --> 0:32:48.480
<v Speaker 1>So here's the thing. It is often the women, but

0:32:49.760 --> 0:32:52.440
<v Speaker 1>I think the main issue you're highlighting here is different.

0:32:54.240 --> 0:33:00.960
<v Speaker 1>Very often a partner will become triangulated explain the term

0:33:01.520 --> 0:33:05.920
<v Speaker 1>in the relationship between their partner and their parents or parents.

0:33:07.400 --> 0:33:10.720
<v Speaker 1>So you are having issues, I'm having issues with you

0:33:12.960 --> 0:33:16.200
<v Speaker 1>male female, It doesn't really matter them. The person is

0:33:16.200 --> 0:33:20.760
<v Speaker 1>having some issues with their parents, all sorts. But I

0:33:20.760 --> 0:33:24.400
<v Speaker 1>don't fully confront you. So there's two options. A Version

0:33:24.440 --> 0:33:27.280
<v Speaker 1>one is I don't fully confront you, but my partner

0:33:27.320 --> 0:33:30.960
<v Speaker 1>becomes the person who confronts you. My partner is expressing

0:33:31.120 --> 0:33:35.400
<v Speaker 1>my anger to you, and what it actually produces is

0:33:35.440 --> 0:33:38.200
<v Speaker 1>that I then can become the loyal person that defends

0:33:38.240 --> 0:33:42.320
<v Speaker 1>you to my partner. That's the triangulation. So you're doing

0:33:42.360 --> 0:33:44.400
<v Speaker 1>what a partner should do it. That's right, you do

0:33:44.440 --> 0:33:47.920
<v Speaker 1>the dirty job. You're taking on the feelings and the

0:33:47.920 --> 0:33:51.120
<v Speaker 1>confrontations that your partner isn't that they should be having

0:33:51.120 --> 0:33:53.960
<v Speaker 1>with their own parents, and you're doing it for them,

0:33:54.000 --> 0:33:56.400
<v Speaker 1>and then you will be burnt for it too. Quite often.

0:33:57.000 --> 0:33:59.480
<v Speaker 1>Version number two is I have been in an open

0:33:59.480 --> 0:34:02.800
<v Speaker 1>confrontation with you, and therefore I picked the one partner

0:34:02.840 --> 0:34:04.880
<v Speaker 1>that I knew for a fact, you were never going

0:34:04.960 --> 0:34:09.279
<v Speaker 1>to accept as a as a statement of my autonomy,

0:34:09.760 --> 0:34:12.920
<v Speaker 1>my sovereignty, and my freedom and the fact that you

0:34:12.960 --> 0:34:14.520
<v Speaker 1>ain't going to be the best of me. Yeah, we

0:34:14.680 --> 0:34:17.000
<v Speaker 1>call that a fuck you. Okay, you said it.

0:34:18.719 --> 0:34:18.919
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:34:19.080 --> 0:34:22.279
<v Speaker 2>So in your law, in your work as a therapist,

0:34:23.560 --> 0:34:26.400
<v Speaker 2>how often are people coming to you because it's familiar

0:34:26.520 --> 0:34:29.719
<v Speaker 2>all and how often because it's personal?

0:34:30.520 --> 0:34:34.600
<v Speaker 1>Or can you not separate? That's a beautiful question. Look,

0:34:34.640 --> 0:34:38.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm a family therapist by training. I'm a systems oriented

0:34:38.239 --> 0:34:43.880
<v Speaker 1>family therapy. That's where I really was incubated. Then I

0:34:44.040 --> 0:34:47.320
<v Speaker 1>moved to coppers. Why did I move to couples therapy?

0:34:47.680 --> 0:34:53.680
<v Speaker 1>That's an interesting question to your because couple's therapy really

0:34:53.800 --> 0:34:57.640
<v Speaker 1>became more prominent and popular when, for the first time

0:34:57.719 --> 0:35:02.680
<v Speaker 1>in history, the survival of the family depended on the

0:35:02.719 --> 0:35:08.200
<v Speaker 1>happiness of the couple. Throughout history, the couple could be miserable,

0:35:08.480 --> 0:35:11.520
<v Speaker 1>it didn't really matter because the family stayed together no

0:35:11.560 --> 0:35:16.640
<v Speaker 1>matter what. But once we could leave, our expectations about

0:35:16.680 --> 0:35:22.200
<v Speaker 1>what would make us stay fundamentally changed by women, by

0:35:22.200 --> 0:35:27.040
<v Speaker 1>the way, primarily, So this is why couple's therapy became

0:35:27.080 --> 0:35:29.160
<v Speaker 1>no longer just to bring in the partner, because they

0:35:29.160 --> 0:35:32.240
<v Speaker 1>have a child that's having challenges. But this is because

0:35:32.400 --> 0:35:35.560
<v Speaker 1>the relationship between the couple is what's going to determine

0:35:35.800 --> 0:35:38.359
<v Speaker 1>who the children are going to live with and if

0:35:38.400 --> 0:35:42.000
<v Speaker 1>the family will stay together or not in its original composition.

0:35:43.719 --> 0:35:47.759
<v Speaker 1>So are the issues familial or as the individual. I

0:35:47.800 --> 0:35:51.600
<v Speaker 1>think that it's very hard to separate where you've learned

0:35:52.120 --> 0:35:56.000
<v Speaker 1>how to connect or how to be more vigilant, where

0:35:56.040 --> 0:35:59.320
<v Speaker 1>you've learned to trust, where you've learned how to express

0:35:59.360 --> 0:36:03.800
<v Speaker 1>your emotions, how you've learned whether to cry is okay,

0:36:04.160 --> 0:36:06.919
<v Speaker 1>whether to laugh out loud, whether to be ambitious, Where

0:36:06.920 --> 0:36:10.680
<v Speaker 1>you've learned to be held and rocked and sowed versus

0:36:10.680 --> 0:36:16.040
<v Speaker 1>being attacked and violated and harmed. All of those major

0:36:16.520 --> 0:36:20.719
<v Speaker 1>foundational experiences about being in relationship. You have learned with

0:36:20.840 --> 0:36:26.680
<v Speaker 1>the people who raised you, the parents of parental figures. However,

0:36:27.200 --> 0:36:29.880
<v Speaker 1>where you've learned, it doesn't mean that that's where you stay.

0:36:31.080 --> 0:36:33.200
<v Speaker 1>You are not just what happened to you. You are

0:36:33.239 --> 0:36:38.000
<v Speaker 1>also what you become, and that's where you have control

0:36:38.200 --> 0:36:42.840
<v Speaker 1>over what you become. Yes, but I'm not sure I

0:36:42.840 --> 0:36:45.440
<v Speaker 1>would use the word control. I think it's a conversation.

0:36:46.280 --> 0:36:49.319
<v Speaker 1>Some pieces will stay, but you can choose to do

0:36:49.360 --> 0:36:51.759
<v Speaker 1>certain things with it. You can turn them around, you

0:36:51.800 --> 0:36:55.000
<v Speaker 1>can become more creative about it. They are your raw material,

0:36:55.480 --> 0:36:59.240
<v Speaker 1>but your raw material sometimes you can, you know, warm

0:36:59.280 --> 0:37:02.240
<v Speaker 1>it up again and then give it a new shape. Right,

0:37:03.080 --> 0:37:07.719
<v Speaker 1>that's the thing. Yes, exactly After this short break, Esther

0:37:07.800 --> 0:37:12.080
<v Speaker 1>Parrel answers a question about her own marriage, which might

0:37:12.200 --> 0:37:17.160
<v Speaker 1>even have surprised her. You've been married for a long time?

0:37:17.840 --> 0:37:22.360
<v Speaker 2>Or is something when you have an argument with your husband?

0:37:23.800 --> 0:37:24.000
<v Speaker 3>Yes?

0:37:24.280 --> 0:37:31.480
<v Speaker 1>Who wins the argument? Ester Parrel? Oh, it's going back

0:37:31.480 --> 0:37:33.799
<v Speaker 1>and forth. I think, you know, it depends what you

0:37:33.880 --> 0:37:36.000
<v Speaker 1>call winning the argument. Is it the person who says,

0:37:36.040 --> 0:37:37.680
<v Speaker 1>I had enough of this, We're not going to talk

0:37:37.719 --> 0:37:40.000
<v Speaker 1>about it? Is the person who wins? Or is it

0:37:40.040 --> 0:37:42.600
<v Speaker 1>the person that for two days walks around in a

0:37:42.600 --> 0:37:45.719
<v Speaker 1>funk drive because you know, you really annoyed me and

0:37:45.719 --> 0:37:49.080
<v Speaker 1>I have nothing left to say to you. I think

0:37:49.320 --> 0:37:55.840
<v Speaker 1>who wins the argument is actually humor and the notion

0:37:56.040 --> 0:38:01.400
<v Speaker 1>that love can encompass at the same time, not in

0:38:01.480 --> 0:38:06.080
<v Speaker 1>the same moment, but one after another. You're impossible. I

0:38:06.120 --> 0:38:08.320
<v Speaker 1>can't bear the thought of staying with you another minute,

0:38:08.760 --> 0:38:11.919
<v Speaker 1>and then, oh my god, I can't imagine my life

0:38:11.960 --> 0:38:15.759
<v Speaker 1>without you, and that's the winner. The winner is the

0:38:15.880 --> 0:38:19.239
<v Speaker 1>love that knows that when this is over, this comes back,

0:38:19.760 --> 0:38:23.040
<v Speaker 1>that after the rain comes the sun and a good

0:38:23.120 --> 0:38:25.560
<v Speaker 1>dose of humor will help that too. I think that

0:38:25.920 --> 0:38:29.160
<v Speaker 1>the winner is less about him or me, but the

0:38:29.200 --> 0:38:31.160
<v Speaker 1>force that we are able to bring in at that

0:38:31.320 --> 0:38:33.640
<v Speaker 1>moment that says, really, is that what we're going to do?

0:38:35.160 --> 0:38:38.600
<v Speaker 1>And I would say he's better at the humor, He's better. Yeah,

0:38:38.640 --> 0:38:41.400
<v Speaker 1>he's the better diffuser. But he's a psychologist.

0:38:41.480 --> 0:38:44.320
<v Speaker 2>He's a psychologist, and in what why does he differ

0:38:44.360 --> 0:38:47.560
<v Speaker 2>from you in his approach to so.

0:38:47.480 --> 0:38:53.360
<v Speaker 1>My husband has actually worked for decades in global mental

0:38:53.400 --> 0:38:58.640
<v Speaker 1>health and in collective trauma, disasters, terrorist attacks, wars, post conflict,

0:38:59.600 --> 0:39:03.200
<v Speaker 1>and more injury of war. I re jokingly said that

0:39:03.200 --> 0:39:07.960
<v Speaker 1>he does pain and I do pleasure. Well, you know

0:39:08.080 --> 0:39:11.640
<v Speaker 1>that's the complete package. Yeah, you need both. You do

0:39:11.840 --> 0:39:14.320
<v Speaker 1>need both. And that also is the story of life,

0:39:15.480 --> 0:39:17.520
<v Speaker 1>isn't it. It's not that you need both, it's a

0:39:17.560 --> 0:39:19.880
<v Speaker 1>fact that both are. Yes, I agree with you.

0:39:19.880 --> 0:39:22.880
<v Speaker 2>My mother always says, if you live long enough, something

0:39:22.960 --> 0:39:24.399
<v Speaker 2>terrible is going to happen to you.

0:39:25.000 --> 0:39:27.319
<v Speaker 1>And it's true, or you can put it this way.

0:39:27.600 --> 0:39:30.440
<v Speaker 1>Can you know joy. If you have a known sadness,

0:39:30.600 --> 0:39:32.760
<v Speaker 1>can you know pleasure? If you have a known pain?

0:39:34.040 --> 0:39:35.840
<v Speaker 1>Do you need to know one in order to be

0:39:35.880 --> 0:39:40.120
<v Speaker 1>able to identify the other? Can you know? And I

0:39:40.160 --> 0:39:44.440
<v Speaker 1>think that that juxtaposition that yin yang is actually effectively

0:39:44.719 --> 0:39:45.040
<v Speaker 1>it's the.

0:39:45.120 --> 0:39:49.600
<v Speaker 2>Parrella I love you, I love you, Go and listen

0:39:49.640 --> 0:39:54.680
<v Speaker 2>to my mother, so good, like such a gift twelve

0:39:54.760 --> 0:39:58.600
<v Speaker 2>years old. You were right what you thought? Thank you,

0:39:58.880 --> 0:40:02.080
<v Speaker 2>Thank you for sharing us this moment on no filter.

0:40:02.920 --> 0:40:06.839
<v Speaker 2>So it start for someone, say, who is listening, who

0:40:07.080 --> 0:40:09.759
<v Speaker 2>is having this issue with their parents, who perhaps are

0:40:09.760 --> 0:40:17.680
<v Speaker 2>not accepting of their partner. What strategies can they employ

0:40:18.920 --> 0:40:25.720
<v Speaker 2>two lead to some sort of softening of relations, thawing

0:40:25.800 --> 0:40:26.320
<v Speaker 2>of relations.

0:40:26.400 --> 0:40:29.520
<v Speaker 1>So an image I often have when I work with

0:40:29.680 --> 0:40:37.920
<v Speaker 1>families who are trapped in a rigid, repetitious impass like

0:40:38.000 --> 0:40:44.480
<v Speaker 1>this accept me I want anything is when you play pool,

0:40:45.800 --> 0:40:48.480
<v Speaker 1>if you want to kick this ball to go in

0:40:48.520 --> 0:40:52.720
<v Speaker 1>the hole, that is not the ball you kick? Which

0:40:52.760 --> 0:40:55.319
<v Speaker 1>is the ball I need to kick for this one

0:40:55.400 --> 0:40:59.040
<v Speaker 1>to then be pushed and then to go right. It's

0:40:59.120 --> 0:41:03.440
<v Speaker 1>the angle. Yes, So who else in the environment of

0:41:03.800 --> 0:41:13.719
<v Speaker 1>your parents, brands, clergy, physicians, neighbors would you speak to

0:41:14.280 --> 0:41:20.360
<v Speaker 1>who have leverage, grandparents, who could speak to the parents,

0:41:20.719 --> 0:41:26.080
<v Speaker 1>and first and foremost understand what is this intransigence? And

0:41:26.239 --> 0:41:30.280
<v Speaker 1>often you will notice that in transigence, the rigidity, the stock,

0:41:30.520 --> 0:41:34.560
<v Speaker 1>the no I want is not just because your partner

0:41:34.680 --> 0:41:38.040
<v Speaker 1>is this, this, this, but it's because if my mother

0:41:38.239 --> 0:41:42.400
<v Speaker 1>saw what I let you do. Everyone has a loyalty

0:41:42.880 --> 0:41:46.440
<v Speaker 1>or a debate or a conflict that it goes up

0:41:46.440 --> 0:41:50.879
<v Speaker 1>to the next generation, an allegiance past, yes, an allegiance

0:41:51.160 --> 0:41:55.880
<v Speaker 1>or an act to grind and be both. So you

0:41:55.920 --> 0:41:59.280
<v Speaker 1>are at this level. You're meeting people at the ground level.

0:41:59.400 --> 0:42:01.680
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes you have to go to the attic and sometimes

0:42:01.680 --> 0:42:04.960
<v Speaker 1>you have to go to the basement. Otherwise you're just

0:42:05.120 --> 0:42:08.239
<v Speaker 1>staying in the same place. What I can for the

0:42:08.280 --> 0:42:17.560
<v Speaker 1>attic is God, my religion, my tradition, the larger forces,

0:42:17.719 --> 0:42:20.279
<v Speaker 1>what my people did in order to get here, that

0:42:20.320 --> 0:42:24.040
<v Speaker 1>you are doing in one thing. You know, on what

0:42:24.120 --> 0:42:26.319
<v Speaker 1>where did you get the idea that you could just

0:42:26.520 --> 0:42:28.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, we fought for this, you know, and you

0:42:29.040 --> 0:42:33.840
<v Speaker 1>are just like so everybody is negotiating the loyalty and

0:42:33.880 --> 0:42:37.920
<v Speaker 1>the freedom and individuals. And in the basement is the grandparents,

0:42:37.960 --> 0:42:41.239
<v Speaker 1>is the generations it's the roots of the story, the

0:42:41.840 --> 0:42:45.160
<v Speaker 1>invisible things that are pulling at this conflict that have

0:42:45.239 --> 0:42:47.640
<v Speaker 1>nothing to do with what people are actually thinking they're

0:42:47.680 --> 0:42:53.920
<v Speaker 1>talking about. So my strategy is to go up, down

0:42:54.040 --> 0:42:58.480
<v Speaker 1>and sideways. Sideways is all who can we talk to?

0:42:58.920 --> 0:43:01.319
<v Speaker 1>Is that really? What is it that you you know?

0:43:01.840 --> 0:43:04.240
<v Speaker 1>So now we bring in the best friend of your parents,

0:43:04.360 --> 0:43:06.200
<v Speaker 1>or your mother or your father. And are you doing

0:43:06.239 --> 0:43:07.319
<v Speaker 1>this in a sense.

0:43:07.040 --> 0:43:10.480
<v Speaker 2>Where you are going in with an open hand, I

0:43:10.560 --> 0:43:14.040
<v Speaker 2>need your helpier or are you really just shoring up

0:43:15.239 --> 0:43:17.480
<v Speaker 2>that relationship in terms.

0:43:17.320 --> 0:43:20.640
<v Speaker 1>Me or the child. The child, my relationship with my

0:43:20.760 --> 0:43:24.400
<v Speaker 1>mother or my father with my mother is very important.

0:43:24.440 --> 0:43:27.759
<v Speaker 1>My relationship with my dad really matterss to me. My

0:43:27.880 --> 0:43:31.520
<v Speaker 1>dad thinks that because of who I'm bringing home, I'm

0:43:31.600 --> 0:43:36.359
<v Speaker 1>basically saying, fuck you, I don't care about you. If

0:43:36.400 --> 0:43:39.319
<v Speaker 1>only they knew, this is the thing I also say

0:43:39.400 --> 0:43:41.719
<v Speaker 1>to the parents, if only they knew how I've been

0:43:41.760 --> 0:43:45.160
<v Speaker 1>thinking about his response day in and day out, and

0:43:45.200 --> 0:43:48.080
<v Speaker 1>how much conflict with my own partner I'm having because

0:43:48.120 --> 0:43:50.719
<v Speaker 1>my dad is saying no over my dad body, I'm

0:43:50.719 --> 0:43:53.799
<v Speaker 1>not coming to your wedding, and that is interpreted as

0:43:53.880 --> 0:43:56.200
<v Speaker 1>you don't care about what I think when in fact,

0:43:56.200 --> 0:43:58.640
<v Speaker 1>the kid is obsessed with what a parent is thinking

0:43:58.680 --> 0:44:00.480
<v Speaker 1>at the same time as they're doing what they want

0:44:00.520 --> 0:44:02.440
<v Speaker 1>to do as well, but they're not really doing what

0:44:02.480 --> 0:44:05.680
<v Speaker 1>they want because the whole thing is being poisoned. So

0:44:05.719 --> 0:44:07.839
<v Speaker 1>there's a number of things happening at the same time.

0:44:07.960 --> 0:44:10.799
<v Speaker 1>So what is it about my dad? Why do you

0:44:10.840 --> 0:44:11.440
<v Speaker 1>think this is?

0:44:11.480 --> 0:44:11.560
<v Speaker 2>So?

0:44:12.480 --> 0:44:15.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's like, would they would he be humiliated,

0:44:16.200 --> 0:44:18.799
<v Speaker 1>would he feel like he failed? Would he feel like

0:44:18.920 --> 0:44:22.879
<v Speaker 1>he conceded to something that he has? You know that

0:44:22.880 --> 0:44:25.040
<v Speaker 1>that would make him feel less of a father, less

0:44:25.040 --> 0:44:27.000
<v Speaker 1>of a man, less of what? You know? All of this?

0:44:27.320 --> 0:44:30.400
<v Speaker 1>What's the subtext here that I'm that I am? What

0:44:30.520 --> 0:44:32.719
<v Speaker 1>are the things that I'm fighting about that I don't

0:44:32.760 --> 0:44:37.160
<v Speaker 1>even know I'm fighting I'm fighting with? So that's number one.

0:44:37.320 --> 0:44:39.520
<v Speaker 1>The number two is at the same time as this

0:44:39.560 --> 0:44:43.560
<v Speaker 1>is happening. I think what's also important in the strategy

0:44:43.800 --> 0:44:46.279
<v Speaker 1>is to not just think that you have no other

0:44:46.440 --> 0:44:48.520
<v Speaker 1>choice but to go back to your parents and go

0:44:48.640 --> 0:44:51.000
<v Speaker 1>back to your parents, and that either it's something is

0:44:51.040 --> 0:44:53.840
<v Speaker 1>going to soften. Sometimes people don't come to the wedding,

0:44:54.480 --> 0:44:57.880
<v Speaker 1>but then when the grandchild arrives, they actually do have

0:44:57.960 --> 0:45:03.360
<v Speaker 1>a rapprochement, and they are willing to reconnect through the

0:45:03.440 --> 0:45:07.600
<v Speaker 1>grandchildren and they don't lose faith. Their honor is maintained

0:45:07.640 --> 0:45:08.120
<v Speaker 1>as well.

0:45:08.400 --> 0:45:11.200
<v Speaker 2>And then on the other side of that equation is

0:45:11.239 --> 0:45:14.240
<v Speaker 2>that sometimes you have to extend grace.

0:45:15.080 --> 0:45:18.240
<v Speaker 1>Yes, at that moment, you can say now you're coming

0:45:18.280 --> 0:45:20.920
<v Speaker 1>too little, too late, or you say, you know, there

0:45:20.960 --> 0:45:22.759
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of people that have been much better

0:45:22.800 --> 0:45:26.560
<v Speaker 1>grandparents than they were parents, you know. But on the

0:45:26.560 --> 0:45:30.399
<v Speaker 1>other side, if that rapprochement doesn't happen, I think it's

0:45:30.480 --> 0:45:34.240
<v Speaker 1>very important to also tell the young couple in this case,

0:45:35.200 --> 0:45:39.239
<v Speaker 1>who else is in your life who could take on

0:45:39.480 --> 0:45:42.799
<v Speaker 1>some of that role for you. If it was not

0:45:42.920 --> 0:45:46.080
<v Speaker 1>your family of origin, it can be your family of choice.

0:45:46.600 --> 0:45:53.480
<v Speaker 1>Are their friends, neighbors, mentors, teachers, intergenerational friends that you

0:45:53.600 --> 0:45:56.879
<v Speaker 1>know you could develop that relationship with so that you're

0:45:56.920 --> 0:46:00.120
<v Speaker 1>not just thinking, if it doesn't happen with my on

0:46:00.360 --> 0:46:03.879
<v Speaker 1>biological parents, then I'm bereft and I have to deal

0:46:03.920 --> 0:46:06.480
<v Speaker 1>with the grief. You will deal with the grief that

0:46:06.680 --> 0:46:08.879
<v Speaker 1>the loss will be there, The grief will be there,

0:46:09.320 --> 0:46:13.560
<v Speaker 1>the resentment will be there. The did I not matter

0:46:13.640 --> 0:46:15.680
<v Speaker 1>more to you than that? That that's all you know,

0:46:16.120 --> 0:46:20.520
<v Speaker 1>but go and create those things, build the world that

0:46:20.560 --> 0:46:25.280
<v Speaker 1>you want. Yes, yes, have those relationships with other people.

0:46:25.680 --> 0:46:29.200
<v Speaker 1>You're not deprived of these relationships. You're deprived of these

0:46:29.239 --> 0:46:31.560
<v Speaker 1>people to have those types of relationships with.

0:46:31.880 --> 0:46:34.120
<v Speaker 2>And then if you joint have and you can't build

0:46:34.160 --> 0:46:36.480
<v Speaker 2>those sort of relationships, might be the problem isn't with

0:46:36.520 --> 0:46:39.080
<v Speaker 2>your parents, The problem is with you.

0:46:39.080 --> 0:46:42.400
<v Speaker 1>You know, then it's you know, other community organizations are

0:46:42.440 --> 0:46:45.880
<v Speaker 1>the horses of worship. But you need to go to

0:46:46.000 --> 0:46:50.399
<v Speaker 1>places that value these kinds of that have the same

0:46:50.520 --> 0:46:54.920
<v Speaker 1>values and for whom these bonds matter. And I think that,

0:46:57.600 --> 0:46:59.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, those are the first two that that come

0:46:59.560 --> 0:47:02.440
<v Speaker 1>to mind right away. Once you have kids there and

0:47:02.480 --> 0:47:04.600
<v Speaker 1>they go to school, you meet other parents too. I

0:47:04.600 --> 0:47:08.359
<v Speaker 1>mean it is communal. It is not a one, one

0:47:08.360 --> 0:47:13.600
<v Speaker 1>on one thing. But that's the first two strategies. Is

0:47:13.640 --> 0:47:16.560
<v Speaker 1>this what I've just described, all right?

0:47:16.760 --> 0:47:22.839
<v Speaker 2>Esther, the story of Romeo and Juliet, the opposition from

0:47:22.840 --> 0:47:30.360
<v Speaker 2>the parents intensifies the desire for two star cross lovers

0:47:30.960 --> 0:47:34.040
<v Speaker 2>to be together. How often do you think that is

0:47:34.080 --> 0:47:34.600
<v Speaker 2>the case?

0:47:35.520 --> 0:47:38.520
<v Speaker 1>How About if we look at it developmentally, it is

0:47:38.600 --> 0:47:43.680
<v Speaker 1>sometimes the case when there is no sense of we

0:47:43.760 --> 0:47:49.279
<v Speaker 1>have a common enemy. We are both strengthened by this

0:47:49.440 --> 0:47:53.960
<v Speaker 1>rejection or this refusal, and it only emboldens us. But

0:47:54.040 --> 0:47:57.120
<v Speaker 1>it is a defensive state. It doesn't just mean that

0:47:57.480 --> 0:48:00.160
<v Speaker 1>you know. At first, that defensive state is introduced, but

0:48:00.360 --> 0:48:03.560
<v Speaker 1>they don't understand the specialness of our love. Our connection

0:48:03.680 --> 0:48:07.560
<v Speaker 1>is a divine intervention what we have. The world cannot understand.

0:48:08.960 --> 0:48:13.440
<v Speaker 1>That's nice, a nice way of telling the story, but

0:48:13.680 --> 0:48:15.960
<v Speaker 1>that is just one of the narratives. Then comes the

0:48:16.000 --> 0:48:21.120
<v Speaker 1>next narrative, which is, you know, I have to stand

0:48:21.200 --> 0:48:23.719
<v Speaker 1>we stand with each other. I have to stand by you.

0:48:24.280 --> 0:48:29.040
<v Speaker 1>That wicked step mother that you know it's a and

0:48:29.080 --> 0:48:35.279
<v Speaker 1>so you. Then comes the next narrative, which is I

0:48:35.320 --> 0:48:39.279
<v Speaker 1>saw you being nice to my wicked step mother. You

0:48:39.320 --> 0:48:42.520
<v Speaker 1>know I don't want to trial. Yes, now you are

0:48:42.880 --> 0:48:47.160
<v Speaker 1>leaving the defense lines where we agreed on what kind

0:48:47.160 --> 0:48:50.319
<v Speaker 1>of strategy we'll be going to protect ourselves with. And

0:48:50.760 --> 0:48:53.400
<v Speaker 1>you we have to be united. We have to be

0:48:53.600 --> 0:48:56.560
<v Speaker 1>united means we have to be the same. We have

0:48:56.600 --> 0:48:58.920
<v Speaker 1>to be the same, means you are risking to become

0:48:59.040 --> 0:49:04.120
<v Speaker 1>enmeshed in order to preserve ourselves against the forces on

0:49:04.160 --> 0:49:09.120
<v Speaker 1>the other side. So the story shifts, It reinforces the

0:49:09.160 --> 0:49:13.200
<v Speaker 1>couples at certain points. It also it becomes a defensive

0:49:13.200 --> 0:49:18.120
<v Speaker 1>posture at other times, and then it becomes a fusional

0:49:18.239 --> 0:49:21.160
<v Speaker 1>force where you are not allowed to actually experience it

0:49:21.200 --> 0:49:25.359
<v Speaker 1>differently because we have to be a united front. And

0:49:25.400 --> 0:49:32.160
<v Speaker 1>then what happens. Can of relationship continue when it's lumbering

0:49:32.200 --> 0:49:34.520
<v Speaker 1>around and it has to be a two backed base.

0:49:34.680 --> 0:49:37.960
<v Speaker 1>I've seen every version. I've seen people who let their

0:49:38.040 --> 0:49:41.399
<v Speaker 1>children go and meet the grand parents secretly. I've seen

0:49:41.440 --> 0:49:44.560
<v Speaker 1>the people go and talk to their brothers without the

0:49:45.000 --> 0:49:47.719
<v Speaker 1>partner knowing because the partner had said, you know, your

0:49:47.719 --> 0:49:50.280
<v Speaker 1>brother spoke to me not nicely, and I'm never talking

0:49:50.280 --> 0:49:55.239
<v Speaker 1>to them again. And it's look, here's the one thing

0:49:55.239 --> 0:49:57.520
<v Speaker 1>you need to know. And I think that that is

0:49:57.560 --> 0:50:02.560
<v Speaker 1>so important. Cutoffs, be it from the parents to the children,

0:50:02.680 --> 0:50:05.920
<v Speaker 1>children to the parents, or interest sibling. Cut offs in

0:50:06.120 --> 0:50:12.439
<v Speaker 1>families are anything but distance. Even if I don't see

0:50:12.480 --> 0:50:18.200
<v Speaker 1>you for years, a cut off has a tremendous psychic energy.

0:50:20.040 --> 0:50:24.239
<v Speaker 1>To talk to somebody is sometimes way less burdensome than

0:50:24.400 --> 0:50:27.480
<v Speaker 1>not to talk to somebody. So I may not have

0:50:27.560 --> 0:50:31.160
<v Speaker 1>spoken to you for twenty years. I never saw my

0:50:31.239 --> 0:50:33.640
<v Speaker 1>parents again. I never talked to my brother again, and

0:50:34.040 --> 0:50:36.799
<v Speaker 1>you know that kind of thing. But I have yet

0:50:36.840 --> 0:50:39.480
<v Speaker 1>to meet a family who when this is happening, this

0:50:39.600 --> 0:50:41.680
<v Speaker 1>isn't part of what they tell me within the first

0:50:41.680 --> 0:50:45.680
<v Speaker 1>three minutes. If you're telling me this within the first

0:50:45.719 --> 0:50:49.960
<v Speaker 1>three minutes, it means it had an identifier, a defining

0:50:50.520 --> 0:50:55.319
<v Speaker 1>element to the entire relational history of this family. When

0:50:55.360 --> 0:51:00.640
<v Speaker 1>you do genograms intergenerational trees, every time there will be

0:51:00.719 --> 0:51:03.640
<v Speaker 1>a description about these people. Never talk to these people.

0:51:03.760 --> 0:51:06.560
<v Speaker 1>This person took all the money, this person took the

0:51:06.640 --> 0:51:09.319
<v Speaker 1>partner of the other, this person refused the person that

0:51:09.360 --> 0:51:13.440
<v Speaker 1>they are. Whatever the reasons for cutoffs, I think they

0:51:13.480 --> 0:51:19.080
<v Speaker 1>are among the most impactful measures that you can do

0:51:19.239 --> 0:51:21.879
<v Speaker 1>to a family system. And the way I know it

0:51:21.920 --> 0:51:24.719
<v Speaker 1>is because there is not a family that has that

0:51:24.760 --> 0:51:27.239
<v Speaker 1>I've worked with that when this has happened, even in

0:51:27.280 --> 0:51:30.560
<v Speaker 1>the generations before, doesn't tell it to me within the

0:51:30.560 --> 0:51:36.360
<v Speaker 1>first three minutes. Silence is violence. Silence is loaded.

0:51:38.000 --> 0:51:41.600
<v Speaker 2>As well, And hence the expression you know someone's living

0:51:41.600 --> 0:51:45.440
<v Speaker 2>rein free in your head because the absence.

0:51:45.200 --> 0:51:47.960
<v Speaker 1>That is a powerful say that I see the image, Yes,

0:51:48.000 --> 0:51:50.480
<v Speaker 1>the real estate of absence.

0:51:51.160 --> 0:51:55.840
<v Speaker 2>The realest side of apps, like the empty lot, Yes,

0:51:56.160 --> 0:51:58.160
<v Speaker 2>the empty lot with squirrels.

0:51:58.640 --> 0:52:04.640
<v Speaker 1>Yes, you know this is a very vast topic. Yes,

0:52:04.719 --> 0:52:06.759
<v Speaker 1>and it has always been a part of working with

0:52:06.840 --> 0:52:10.920
<v Speaker 1>families and couples and mixed marriages, and but at this

0:52:11.120 --> 0:52:17.160
<v Speaker 1>moment there is a real resurgence of family estrangements, low contact,

0:52:17.280 --> 0:52:21.000
<v Speaker 1>low contact. Yes, why do you think I think the best?

0:52:22.920 --> 0:52:25.839
<v Speaker 1>There's many ways probably to understand it. But the way

0:52:25.880 --> 0:52:31.239
<v Speaker 1>that I get it is that because the underlying assumptions

0:52:31.680 --> 0:52:36.080
<v Speaker 1>of what drives relationships has fundamentally shifted. I used to

0:52:36.120 --> 0:52:38.200
<v Speaker 1>be able. I used to have to continue to see

0:52:38.239 --> 0:52:40.960
<v Speaker 1>my parents and the rest of the family no matter

0:52:41.000 --> 0:52:44.720
<v Speaker 1>what I thought, no matter how I felt, it was duty,

0:52:44.800 --> 0:52:48.960
<v Speaker 1>it was obligation. That is what drove relationships to their

0:52:48.960 --> 0:52:54.320
<v Speaker 1>relationships and our free choice enterprise, And they are determined

0:52:54.360 --> 0:52:57.560
<v Speaker 1>by how I feel. And if I don't feel close

0:52:57.600 --> 0:52:59.719
<v Speaker 1>to you, and if I don't love you, and if

0:52:59.760 --> 0:53:02.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't I don't think you loved me properly, I

0:53:02.160 --> 0:53:06.440
<v Speaker 1>don't really feel like I should have to. That is

0:53:06.480 --> 0:53:12.560
<v Speaker 1>a different set of assumptions about the basis with which

0:53:12.600 --> 0:53:15.600
<v Speaker 1>I decide how to behave in my relationships. What I'm

0:53:15.640 --> 0:53:18.400
<v Speaker 1>to accept and what I am not to accept, what

0:53:18.560 --> 0:53:23.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm to keep silent. Where's the truth to myself versus

0:53:23.040 --> 0:53:24.239
<v Speaker 1>my obligation to you?

0:53:24.920 --> 0:53:27.640
<v Speaker 2>And where once you were in Gigi bound to be

0:53:27.760 --> 0:53:30.440
<v Speaker 2>at church on Sunday whatever, so you would have to cross.

0:53:30.600 --> 0:53:34.240
<v Speaker 2>That's not really a thing anymore because what does.

0:53:34.080 --> 0:53:36.880
<v Speaker 1>The church mean to me? If it is meaningful to

0:53:36.920 --> 0:53:40.320
<v Speaker 1>me to be there? So the individual is in the center.

0:53:40.880 --> 0:53:43.640
<v Speaker 1>Before that, the family was in the center, and the

0:53:43.680 --> 0:53:49.799
<v Speaker 1>individual adjusted to the family. I'm traditional, but you know

0:53:50.640 --> 0:53:52.799
<v Speaker 1>I used to go. People were going home for the

0:53:52.840 --> 0:53:59.000
<v Speaker 1>holidays and they had to endure the same banter, bad jokes, questions,

0:53:59.400 --> 0:54:01.399
<v Speaker 1>And now it's like, why shall I go? We never

0:54:01.440 --> 0:54:03.480
<v Speaker 1>get to talk about anything. They start to bother me,

0:54:03.520 --> 0:54:05.880
<v Speaker 1>they start to humiliate me, the embarrass me, they make

0:54:05.920 --> 0:54:08.400
<v Speaker 1>me I should I don't think I should go. And

0:54:08.480 --> 0:54:11.120
<v Speaker 1>if I live by the how does it affect me?

0:54:11.840 --> 0:54:14.239
<v Speaker 1>I will make some kind of decisions. And if I

0:54:14.320 --> 0:54:17.440
<v Speaker 1>live by it doesn't matter how it affects me, because

0:54:17.440 --> 0:54:20.839
<v Speaker 1>that's what's expected of me. I will react differently. And

0:54:20.880 --> 0:54:24.040
<v Speaker 1>the complicated thing today is that many of us don't

0:54:24.080 --> 0:54:28.080
<v Speaker 1>just live within one value system. We will integrate multiple

0:54:28.160 --> 0:54:29.959
<v Speaker 1>value systems inside of us.

0:54:30.600 --> 0:54:34.239
<v Speaker 2>And do you think baral question it is better to

0:54:34.280 --> 0:54:40.360
<v Speaker 2>put the individual above the social structures, or vice versa.

0:54:42.480 --> 0:54:46.719
<v Speaker 1>When people lived in the bosom of community and communal

0:54:46.800 --> 0:54:53.399
<v Speaker 1>life and tribes and villages, they longed for freedom and

0:54:53.480 --> 0:54:59.840
<v Speaker 1>for free choice. And when people live within the individualistic,

0:55:00.280 --> 0:55:07.000
<v Speaker 1>hyperindividualistic structures of modern urban living, they are obsessed to

0:55:07.120 --> 0:55:13.120
<v Speaker 1>talk about community and rebuilding the village. Are people never happy?

0:55:15.560 --> 0:55:18.680
<v Speaker 1>People will often long for the part of life that

0:55:18.960 --> 0:55:21.759
<v Speaker 1>is not attended to enough in the model that they're

0:55:21.800 --> 0:55:27.560
<v Speaker 1>living in. Beautiful, beautiful. I really think that that's the

0:55:27.680 --> 0:55:31.800
<v Speaker 1>It's not that people are that you need both. You

0:55:32.000 --> 0:55:33.880
<v Speaker 1>need freedom and you need security.

0:55:33.960 --> 0:55:36.400
<v Speaker 2>But I also think that there's a maybe because of

0:55:36.440 --> 0:55:39.880
<v Speaker 2>the departure from the church, et cetera, in those community structures,

0:55:40.680 --> 0:55:43.840
<v Speaker 2>there's a lot of people who give out advice like

0:55:44.040 --> 0:55:47.120
<v Speaker 2>just cut them off. Just do they make it feel bad,

0:55:47.160 --> 0:55:50.719
<v Speaker 2>that's the end of story. So I think there's encouragement

0:55:50.840 --> 0:55:58.319
<v Speaker 2>to people to there's a conflating exercising your power with

0:55:59.040 --> 0:56:02.759
<v Speaker 2>cutting people for extriciding yourself from a situation and then

0:56:02.840 --> 0:56:07.680
<v Speaker 2>never returning to it, And I don't think they necessarily beneficial.

0:56:09.200 --> 0:56:14.480
<v Speaker 1>My answer to this is that I always invite caution

0:56:15.680 --> 0:56:20.799
<v Speaker 1>in giving people that type of advice do this or

0:56:20.840 --> 0:56:24.720
<v Speaker 1>do that, or don't do this, because the only person

0:56:24.760 --> 0:56:27.480
<v Speaker 1>who has to live with the consequences of the decision

0:56:28.480 --> 0:56:32.000
<v Speaker 1>is that person, not you. It's very easy to say

0:56:32.000 --> 0:56:36.520
<v Speaker 1>to people to cut things off or to leave or

0:56:36.560 --> 0:56:40.680
<v Speaker 1>to stay or I don't have to live with the decision. You,

0:56:41.800 --> 0:56:44.279
<v Speaker 1>the person, the protagonist, will have to live with the

0:56:44.360 --> 0:56:46.880
<v Speaker 1>consequences of your decision for the rest of your life.

0:56:48.080 --> 0:56:52.480
<v Speaker 1>And therefore, if you are going to accompany others, accompany

0:56:52.560 --> 0:56:57.920
<v Speaker 1>them in their deliberations, accompany them in their ambivalence, accompany

0:56:58.000 --> 0:57:01.839
<v Speaker 1>them in their self doubt, and stay with them in that.

0:57:02.000 --> 0:57:06.960
<v Speaker 1>Create a holding container that lets them think out loud,

0:57:07.280 --> 0:57:10.840
<v Speaker 1>the pros, the CONTs, the ifs, the yes, the no,

0:57:11.760 --> 0:57:16.240
<v Speaker 1>and you create that space for them and be quiet.

0:57:16.880 --> 0:57:20.320
<v Speaker 1>I'll be quiet. It's like, you know this is to me.

0:57:20.520 --> 0:57:24.040
<v Speaker 1>I say, it's because because especially when you see how

0:57:24.120 --> 0:57:29.280
<v Speaker 1>much pain and doubt and resentment and grief, especially grief

0:57:29.320 --> 0:57:32.400
<v Speaker 1>it brings up in people. Let them first work all

0:57:32.440 --> 0:57:37.760
<v Speaker 1>of this out. How do you not how do you

0:57:37.840 --> 0:57:42.400
<v Speaker 1>not misuse your power? Because I think all the time

0:57:42.520 --> 0:57:45.760
<v Speaker 1>I probably may have at times. You know it's not,

0:57:46.400 --> 0:57:50.200
<v Speaker 1>but I often just think I am not the one

0:57:50.240 --> 0:57:54.040
<v Speaker 1>who's going to have to live with that decision that

0:57:54.240 --> 0:57:58.240
<v Speaker 1>is fundamentally going to be the property of the other person.

0:57:59.160 --> 0:58:04.400
<v Speaker 1>So it's so easy to tell people it's three words

0:58:04.440 --> 0:58:08.120
<v Speaker 1>to say, but it's a whole life to live and

0:58:08.200 --> 0:58:11.680
<v Speaker 1>you have to really respect that. Look, I think that

0:58:11.760 --> 0:58:13.760
<v Speaker 1>the best way I can put it aview is this,

0:58:14.320 --> 0:58:18.280
<v Speaker 1>it's a real sentence that I hold by a lot

0:58:18.600 --> 0:58:23.400
<v Speaker 1>of the relationship dilemmas that people are grappling with are

0:58:23.440 --> 0:58:27.840
<v Speaker 1>not problems that you solve. They are paradoxes that you manage.

0:58:28.360 --> 0:58:31.000
<v Speaker 1>If you stay in touch with these people, you're gonna

0:58:31.000 --> 0:58:34.160
<v Speaker 1>have to endure this and this and this. You may

0:58:34.240 --> 0:58:38.280
<v Speaker 1>receive some of that. You're gonna lose here, You're gonna

0:58:38.320 --> 0:58:42.280
<v Speaker 1>have to stay quiet there, you're gonna it's a whole map.

0:58:42.360 --> 0:58:46.680
<v Speaker 1>It's not the doer. It's not either or black and white.

0:58:47.680 --> 0:58:50.760
<v Speaker 1>If you don't stay in touch with these people, this

0:58:50.840 --> 0:58:53.840
<v Speaker 1>is what may happen. You may feel this, but it's

0:58:53.880 --> 0:58:57.800
<v Speaker 1>gonna come with that. And then you present all of

0:58:57.840 --> 0:59:01.800
<v Speaker 1>this it's Morgos board of the lemmas, and then you

0:59:01.920 --> 0:59:04.280
<v Speaker 1>let people slowly find their way to it. And that

0:59:04.320 --> 0:59:09.320
<v Speaker 1>takes time. In our speed up sped up world where

0:59:09.360 --> 0:59:14.080
<v Speaker 1>everything has to go without, you know, without much friction

0:59:14.680 --> 0:59:22.320
<v Speaker 1>with you know, we want to bypass these stages. Look,

0:59:22.520 --> 0:59:25.080
<v Speaker 1>many people will say I wish I had done this sooner,

0:59:27.080 --> 0:59:29.880
<v Speaker 1>and some people will say why did I never do that?

0:59:30.360 --> 0:59:34.080
<v Speaker 1>Or I wish I hadn't done it. But that said,

0:59:35.480 --> 0:59:39.280
<v Speaker 1>they need to get there on their own terms. That

0:59:39.480 --> 0:59:42.200
<v Speaker 1>is the role of me as a therapist. If you

0:59:42.240 --> 0:59:46.920
<v Speaker 1>can't do that, then you need more training. I have

0:59:46.960 --> 0:59:48.640
<v Speaker 1>a feeling you're a pretty good therapist.

0:59:49.280 --> 0:59:49.960
<v Speaker 2>For some.

0:59:51.800 --> 0:59:53.840
<v Speaker 1>You haven't been good. For Yes, I think that the

0:59:54.160 --> 0:59:57.400
<v Speaker 1>better you become as a clinician, the better you are.

0:59:57.480 --> 0:59:59.720
<v Speaker 1>For some people you are the perfect fit, and for

0:59:59.800 --> 1:00:02.360
<v Speaker 1>others you need to know that you may not be

1:00:02.440 --> 1:00:05.360
<v Speaker 1>the right person that you recognize. Yes, you know that

1:00:05.760 --> 1:00:07.720
<v Speaker 1>there are other people who will be better at this

1:00:07.840 --> 1:00:10.520
<v Speaker 1>than you. They know the subject more, they have more patience.

1:00:10.960 --> 1:00:13.480
<v Speaker 1>This needs this kind of intervention. That is not what

1:00:13.640 --> 1:00:17.560
<v Speaker 1>you are. Where your strength, Liz, And actually, the better

1:00:17.600 --> 1:00:21.360
<v Speaker 1>you become, the more discerning you are. Esther Parrell, thank you,

1:00:21.360 --> 1:00:21.960
<v Speaker 1>You're welcome.

1:00:22.920 --> 1:00:25.000
<v Speaker 2>One of the things I loved about talking with Esther

1:00:25.280 --> 1:00:29.280
<v Speaker 2>is that she never gives quick, simple answers. There's nothing

1:00:29.600 --> 1:00:34.000
<v Speaker 2>right in a world that increasingly encourages us to cut

1:00:34.040 --> 1:00:36.320
<v Speaker 2>people off, or draw a line in the sand, or

1:00:36.400 --> 1:00:41.000
<v Speaker 2>choose a side Esther reminds us that relationships are rarely

1:00:41.080 --> 1:00:46.880
<v Speaker 2>that simple. Families are messy, love is messy, loyalty is messy,

1:00:47.600 --> 1:00:50.280
<v Speaker 2>and often the most important questions in our lives aren't

1:00:50.400 --> 1:00:55.480
<v Speaker 2>problems to solve, but tensions to live with. I think

1:00:55.520 --> 1:00:58.120
<v Speaker 2>what I'll take away from this conversation is the idea

1:00:58.200 --> 1:01:01.520
<v Speaker 2>that growing up isn't necessary verily about choosing your family

1:01:01.640 --> 1:01:05.120
<v Speaker 2>or choosing your partner. It's about learning how to build

1:01:05.160 --> 1:01:09.800
<v Speaker 2>a life that makes room for both where possible, and

1:01:10.120 --> 1:01:14.320
<v Speaker 2>having the wisdom to know what matters most when it isn't.

1:01:15.160 --> 1:01:18.360
<v Speaker 2>If you enjoy this conversation, we'd love you to follow

1:01:18.400 --> 1:01:22.080
<v Speaker 2>no Filter wherever you're listening now and leave us a review.

1:01:22.840 --> 1:01:25.440
<v Speaker 2>I'm kateline Brock, and I can't wait to see you

1:01:25.440 --> 1:01:26.080
<v Speaker 2>next Monday.