WEBVTT - Ariana Retreats & Are Your Friends Anchors Or Sails?

0:00:03.080 --> 0:00:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome out loud as to mom and me,

0:00:06.160 --> 0:00:08.479
<v Speaker 1>are out Loud, it's what women are actually talking about

0:00:08.560 --> 0:00:11.080
<v Speaker 1>on Monday, the third of August. And my name is

0:00:11.080 --> 0:00:14.800
<v Speaker 1>hollywayen Wright, and I'm em Vernon and I'm Amelia Last

0:00:15.320 --> 0:00:18.759
<v Speaker 1>and here's what's made our agenda for today. She's one

0:00:18.800 --> 0:00:22.520
<v Speaker 1>of the world's most famous trad wives, but she says

0:00:22.560 --> 0:00:24.600
<v Speaker 1>she's actually the absolute opposite.

0:00:25.640 --> 0:00:28.760
<v Speaker 2>Plus an Alista has announced her taking a break from

0:00:28.800 --> 0:00:33.200
<v Speaker 2>public facing work after facing endless scrutiny.

0:00:33.120 --> 0:00:36.239
<v Speaker 3>And are you a sale or an anchor? This new

0:00:36.320 --> 0:00:39.240
<v Speaker 3>theory has me thinking about how in some relationships I'm

0:00:39.240 --> 0:00:41.320
<v Speaker 3>one and in some relationships I'm the other.

0:00:41.880 --> 0:00:44.920
<v Speaker 1>But first, in case you missed it, So, just when

0:00:44.960 --> 0:00:48.000
<v Speaker 1>we were sitting down to plan this show, the news

0:00:48.040 --> 0:00:50.920
<v Speaker 1>came through that Delta Guldrum had just closed the Commonwealth

0:00:50.960 --> 0:00:54.400
<v Speaker 1>Games in Glasgow. There was the Commonwealth Games. This led

0:00:54.480 --> 0:00:59.240
<v Speaker 1>some people to say that and I'm very wary about

0:00:59.280 --> 0:01:01.760
<v Speaker 1>this because remember what happened recently when we did some

0:01:01.760 --> 0:01:06.320
<v Speaker 1>sports reporting here on out loud. Lest even said Ozzie's don't.

0:01:06.080 --> 0:01:08.759
<v Speaker 3>Really like very much, which was a heart take.

0:01:10.760 --> 0:01:13.119
<v Speaker 1>The out Loud has got really upset. But the thing

0:01:13.200 --> 0:01:14.840
<v Speaker 1>is is We've been talking a lot lately about the

0:01:14.880 --> 0:01:17.160
<v Speaker 1>World Cup and various things, but it is true that

0:01:17.240 --> 0:01:21.000
<v Speaker 1>it is not really we have not really gone. We

0:01:21.000 --> 0:01:23.520
<v Speaker 1>should talk about the Commonwealth Games. Why why is that?

0:01:23.600 --> 0:01:25.679
<v Speaker 3>Okay? Is part of it that it wasn't meant to

0:01:25.800 --> 0:01:26.760
<v Speaker 3>happen or something?

0:01:27.000 --> 0:01:29.360
<v Speaker 1>Yes, so a little bit of context first of all,

0:01:29.640 --> 0:01:33.600
<v Speaker 1>ozzi or because we smashed we didn't The Commonwealth Games

0:01:33.600 --> 0:01:37.039
<v Speaker 1>hasn't just finished. We smashed it on then we won.

0:01:37.200 --> 0:01:40.840
<v Speaker 1>We won the Commonwealth Games m with seventy gold medals.

0:01:40.840 --> 0:01:43.399
<v Speaker 1>The closest behind us were England with twenty nine.

0:01:43.400 --> 0:01:46.320
<v Speaker 3>So that's a big, huge We don't even need to

0:01:46.360 --> 0:01:47.840
<v Speaker 3>do that thing we do at the Olympics with the

0:01:47.880 --> 0:01:51.000
<v Speaker 3>per capita medal tally and this one we're just on top.

0:01:51.320 --> 0:01:54.880
<v Speaker 2>Just England's very Commonwealth's.

0:01:54.680 --> 0:01:58.560
<v Speaker 1>They they are, one fact, say they were the responsible

0:01:58.640 --> 0:02:04.760
<v Speaker 1>for the whole theme and so yeah, but this was

0:02:04.800 --> 0:02:07.600
<v Speaker 1>the Games. Remember that was meant to be in Victoria.

0:02:08.120 --> 0:02:09.520
<v Speaker 1>There was a big.

0:02:08.960 --> 0:02:13.200
<v Speaker 3>Bad memory hold in the culture.

0:02:13.360 --> 0:02:15.640
<v Speaker 1>Yes, right, is that there was meant to be not

0:02:15.720 --> 0:02:18.720
<v Speaker 1>just in Melbourne but in several regional cities in Victoria.

0:02:18.760 --> 0:02:21.920
<v Speaker 1>It was a very ambitious statewide project and it was

0:02:22.000 --> 0:02:22.800
<v Speaker 1>meant to be there.

0:02:23.360 --> 0:02:26.799
<v Speaker 2>And then remember we were very excited because we were like, oh,

0:02:26.840 --> 0:02:30.040
<v Speaker 2>Commonwealth Games and then Brisbane's getting the Olympics after that,

0:02:30.200 --> 0:02:30.520
<v Speaker 2>and we.

0:02:30.400 --> 0:02:32.880
<v Speaker 1>Were all very exports world sport, right. But in twenty

0:02:32.960 --> 0:02:36.480
<v Speaker 1>twenty three, the then premiere Dan Andrews went, actually, no,

0:02:36.639 --> 0:02:39.040
<v Speaker 1>that's so wild that he just said, we're.

0:02:38.880 --> 0:02:39.520
<v Speaker 3>Not doing that.

0:02:39.680 --> 0:02:41.360
<v Speaker 1>No, no one had done that, I don't think, and

0:02:41.360 --> 0:02:43.560
<v Speaker 1>they just were like nah. And then for a while

0:02:43.560 --> 0:02:45.480
<v Speaker 1>it looked like the Gold Coast might take it, and

0:02:45.520 --> 0:02:46.160
<v Speaker 1>then they.

0:02:46.080 --> 0:02:48.040
<v Speaker 3>Were like we got too much going on.

0:02:48.120 --> 0:02:50.200
<v Speaker 1>They didn't get any support from the federal government, so

0:02:50.240 --> 0:02:52.480
<v Speaker 1>basically everyone was just passing around the common.

0:02:53.800 --> 0:02:54.920
<v Speaker 3>It falls to Scotland.

0:02:55.000 --> 0:02:58.079
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so Glasgow picked up the potato and you know what,

0:02:58.560 --> 0:02:59.639
<v Speaker 1>we'll make chips with this.

0:02:59.880 --> 0:03:02.320
<v Speaker 3>I feel like Victoria in this scenario is like, you

0:03:02.360 --> 0:03:05.040
<v Speaker 3>know how like in every friendship group there's someone who

0:03:05.200 --> 0:03:07.640
<v Speaker 3>is the most flaky and just kind of counsels at

0:03:07.680 --> 0:03:09.400
<v Speaker 3>the last minute when you've bought a group dinner at

0:03:09.400 --> 0:03:11.400
<v Speaker 3>a particularly nice restaurant.

0:03:10.880 --> 0:03:14.120
<v Speaker 1>One and so somebody else might step in as Glasgow

0:03:14.160 --> 0:03:16.400
<v Speaker 1>did and said okay, we'll do it, but not at

0:03:16.400 --> 0:03:18.360
<v Speaker 1>that really nice restaurant. We're going to do it at

0:03:18.400 --> 0:03:19.519
<v Speaker 1>the Byo.

0:03:19.440 --> 0:03:21.520
<v Speaker 3>Which just seems so Scottish of them, right.

0:03:21.800 --> 0:03:24.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't say that in any way to critique Glasgow,

0:03:24.360 --> 0:03:26.120
<v Speaker 1>but the whole thing is that they said we're going

0:03:26.160 --> 0:03:27.160
<v Speaker 1>to do it, but cut price.

0:03:27.240 --> 0:03:28.119
<v Speaker 3>I love it, yep.

0:03:28.200 --> 0:03:31.360
<v Speaker 1>So a reduced number of events and a new model

0:03:31.400 --> 0:03:33.640
<v Speaker 1>with a reduced number of events, a shorter period of

0:03:33.680 --> 0:03:36.360
<v Speaker 1>time and basically with the fewer bells. It's so great.

0:03:36.400 --> 0:03:38.600
<v Speaker 3>Glasgow like stepping up like that.

0:03:38.760 --> 0:03:41.680
<v Speaker 1>Because they'd done it back in I think twenty thirteen,

0:03:42.280 --> 0:03:44.680
<v Speaker 1>and so they had the infrastructure in place and they

0:03:44.720 --> 0:03:46.839
<v Speaker 1>were like, we can do it. But given that we're

0:03:46.880 --> 0:03:48.040
<v Speaker 1>on a time just.

0:03:48.000 --> 0:03:49.760
<v Speaker 3>Like, yeah, maybe we're not going to put up a

0:03:49.760 --> 0:03:53.000
<v Speaker 3>lot of decorations. Maybe there'll be like a set menu

0:03:53.040 --> 0:03:55.280
<v Speaker 3>for the table as opposed to ordering the car.

0:03:55.440 --> 0:03:58.800
<v Speaker 1>It was very much like that. Still, so Channel seven

0:03:58.840 --> 0:04:00.960
<v Speaker 1>had the rights and they had it on stream. You

0:04:01.000 --> 0:04:02.680
<v Speaker 1>could do catch up as well, because obviously the time

0:04:02.680 --> 0:04:05.720
<v Speaker 1>difference has been a problem, but still take up hasn't

0:04:05.720 --> 0:04:06.360
<v Speaker 1>been huge.

0:04:06.440 --> 0:04:09.839
<v Speaker 3>That's because trying to watch it on Channel seven as

0:04:09.880 --> 0:04:12.080
<v Speaker 3>I did, it was very complicated.

0:04:12.480 --> 0:04:12.960
<v Speaker 4>You couldn't.

0:04:13.000 --> 0:04:14.800
<v Speaker 3>I just wanted to watch them swimming and maybe a

0:04:14.800 --> 0:04:18.000
<v Speaker 3>little bit of weightlifting to get some inspos from my midlife.

0:04:17.600 --> 0:04:19.520
<v Speaker 1>Weightlifting weight program.

0:04:20.560 --> 0:04:24.120
<v Speaker 3>I will say I really loved how the Power Games

0:04:24.560 --> 0:04:28.520
<v Speaker 3>and the non Power Games events were mixed up.

0:04:28.440 --> 0:04:30.080
<v Speaker 1>Together, all happening at once.

0:04:29.839 --> 0:04:33.200
<v Speaker 3>Which was awesome because I was watching it with kids

0:04:33.320 --> 0:04:35.839
<v Speaker 3>and it was just like they're all in there together,

0:04:36.200 --> 0:04:38.520
<v Speaker 3>and I just thought it was a great idea to

0:04:38.560 --> 0:04:40.839
<v Speaker 3>do that. I don't know if that was a Glasgow innovation.

0:04:40.960 --> 0:04:42.719
<v Speaker 1>I think it was, and I think that's a model

0:04:42.720 --> 0:04:45.880
<v Speaker 1>that would should be repeated. So in the end, it's

0:04:45.880 --> 0:04:47.800
<v Speaker 1>been very good for Australian that we've won lots, but

0:04:47.839 --> 0:04:50.080
<v Speaker 1>the ratings were down quite considerably.

0:04:50.279 --> 0:04:53.200
<v Speaker 2>Actually feel very sad and very un Australian and I

0:04:53.240 --> 0:04:54.440
<v Speaker 2>think we should repent.

0:04:54.440 --> 0:04:55.280
<v Speaker 1>We should repair.

0:04:55.360 --> 0:04:59.360
<v Speaker 3>Does that mean that next time you're actually gonna watch one.

0:04:58.480 --> 0:05:01.760
<v Speaker 1>Particularly for the swimmers, because obviously we always do really

0:05:01.800 --> 0:05:04.880
<v Speaker 1>well in the swimming and swimmers, unlike the footballers who

0:05:04.880 --> 0:05:06.599
<v Speaker 1>we all just celebrated at the World Cup, they don't

0:05:06.600 --> 0:05:08.560
<v Speaker 1>get to do it every week on a world stage

0:05:08.560 --> 0:05:11.880
<v Speaker 1>and get paid millions and millions of dollars like Ronaldo

0:05:12.120 --> 0:05:15.960
<v Speaker 1>and Messy and Ballyund and all those guys. So anyway,

0:05:16.040 --> 0:05:20.520
<v Speaker 1>apologies to the Commonwealth Games for not bringing you updates.

0:05:20.520 --> 0:05:23.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, but the most important thing, Delta smashed it.

0:05:23.480 --> 0:05:25.200
<v Speaker 1>There you go, did she? Okay? Good?

0:05:25.279 --> 0:05:29.560
<v Speaker 2>Good, good love that Ariana Grande is taking a break.

0:05:29.760 --> 0:05:32.919
<v Speaker 2>In an exclusive with People magazine, a representative from her

0:05:33.000 --> 0:05:36.279
<v Speaker 2>team put out a statement saying Ariana will be taking

0:05:36.320 --> 0:05:39.440
<v Speaker 2>a step back from visibility after she completes the Eternal

0:05:39.520 --> 0:05:42.839
<v Speaker 2>Sunshine Tour. She looks forward to finishing the tour and

0:05:42.960 --> 0:05:45.600
<v Speaker 2>ending it on a high note, both healthily and happily,

0:05:45.960 --> 0:05:48.760
<v Speaker 2>and then taking a much deserved break from public facing

0:05:48.800 --> 0:05:53.320
<v Speaker 2>work and appearances, which has led to endless ongoing public scrutiny.

0:05:53.720 --> 0:05:56.320
<v Speaker 2>So a few days before this statement was made, Ariana

0:05:56.400 --> 0:05:58.760
<v Speaker 2>released a music video to her song Petal.

0:05:58.839 --> 0:06:01.200
<v Speaker 1>Have you watched the music video? I have watched it.

0:06:01.240 --> 0:06:02.400
<v Speaker 1>I really like It's a very.

0:06:02.279 --> 0:06:05.839
<v Speaker 2>Like artistic storytelling music video. She's portrayed as a woman

0:06:05.839 --> 0:06:08.640
<v Speaker 2>who's going to all of these acting auditions and in

0:06:08.720 --> 0:06:11.279
<v Speaker 2>the men that she's auditioning for keep rejecting her, and

0:06:11.279 --> 0:06:14.359
<v Speaker 2>they were telling her we want the old Ariana, and

0:06:14.400 --> 0:06:16.120
<v Speaker 2>then she gets a chainsaw and murder them.

0:06:16.400 --> 0:06:17.800
<v Speaker 3>It made me clutch my pearls.

0:06:17.839 --> 0:06:23.600
<v Speaker 1>A bit gonna murdering or the thinness the murdering very violent.

0:06:23.880 --> 0:06:26.000
<v Speaker 2>So on this video, when you look on YouTube, the

0:06:26.040 --> 0:06:29.599
<v Speaker 2>most popular comments have nothing to do with the video. Instead,

0:06:29.600 --> 0:06:32.520
<v Speaker 2>they read, it's not about wanting the old Ariana back,

0:06:32.560 --> 0:06:35.239
<v Speaker 2>it's about wanting her to be healthy. At this point,

0:06:35.240 --> 0:06:38.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm judging her team, friends and family. This is insane.

0:06:38.640 --> 0:06:40.440
<v Speaker 2>Who's going to tell her we miss her being healthy

0:06:40.480 --> 0:06:42.880
<v Speaker 2>looking and not the old music. We're living in a

0:06:42.880 --> 0:06:47.840
<v Speaker 2>black mirror episode. So that's in reference to her weight.

0:06:47.880 --> 0:06:50.640
<v Speaker 1>Obviously, Yes, we talked about this on I think a

0:06:50.680 --> 0:06:53.360
<v Speaker 1>subs episode with me, didn't we a while ago when

0:06:53.360 --> 0:06:56.520
<v Speaker 1>she when the tour first started and the visuals were

0:06:56.640 --> 0:07:00.280
<v Speaker 1>being released from the tour. It's not really a question

0:07:00.440 --> 0:07:02.360
<v Speaker 1>of whether or not she looks very very thin. She

0:07:02.400 --> 0:07:05.760
<v Speaker 1>looks very very thin. The debate that erupted is whether

0:07:05.880 --> 0:07:08.360
<v Speaker 1>or not it was okay to kind of say that,

0:07:09.440 --> 0:07:12.600
<v Speaker 1>And the discussion that we had at the time was

0:07:13.360 --> 0:07:16.000
<v Speaker 1>whether it was a help My point was maybe it's not.

0:07:16.160 --> 0:07:18.320
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it's okay to say that, but is it helpful

0:07:18.360 --> 0:07:20.320
<v Speaker 1>to say that, Like, what are we supposed to do

0:07:21.080 --> 0:07:23.040
<v Speaker 1>with that? Or is it just an excuse to sit

0:07:23.120 --> 0:07:26.360
<v Speaker 1>around and say shit about a woman's body. But the

0:07:26.440 --> 0:07:29.640
<v Speaker 1>sentiment that you've just described in cap in that comment

0:07:30.560 --> 0:07:33.840
<v Speaker 1>is one that was also made publicly, very recently after

0:07:33.840 --> 0:07:36.720
<v Speaker 1>the pedal video by people like Jamila Jamil and Charlie Howard,

0:07:36.760 --> 0:07:39.520
<v Speaker 1>who are both sort of body positive advocates. I guess

0:07:39.560 --> 0:07:43.440
<v Speaker 1>you could say just saying this is so grossly irresponsible

0:07:43.480 --> 0:07:48.840
<v Speaker 1>to be celebrating this this level of thinness, and I

0:07:48.840 --> 0:07:50.920
<v Speaker 1>guess in the question of what are we supposed to

0:07:50.960 --> 0:07:54.360
<v Speaker 1>do with that, the idea is maybe pressure her people

0:07:54.400 --> 0:07:56.120
<v Speaker 1>into doing what they've done.

0:07:56.360 --> 0:08:00.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, which is taking her way from public facing roles.

0:08:01.240 --> 0:08:05.080
<v Speaker 2>The Eternal Sunshine tour finishes on the first of September.

0:08:05.120 --> 0:08:07.120
<v Speaker 2>I think she has a few more concerts, but there

0:08:07.160 --> 0:08:10.000
<v Speaker 2>have been things that she's completely canceled, Like she after

0:08:10.040 --> 0:08:12.680
<v Speaker 2>this tour, she was going back to Broadway to do

0:08:12.720 --> 0:08:16.760
<v Speaker 2>a show with Jonathan Bailey in London, and that's been canceled,

0:08:16.800 --> 0:08:19.679
<v Speaker 2>so she's not doing that anymore. But what was really

0:08:19.680 --> 0:08:23.720
<v Speaker 2>interesting is all the comments from her team about what's

0:08:23.800 --> 0:08:26.640
<v Speaker 2>going to be happening and her performing. There was another

0:08:26.720 --> 0:08:30.040
<v Speaker 2>source I told People magazine she performs a very physical

0:08:30.080 --> 0:08:33.640
<v Speaker 2>show and there's a lot of athleticism involved, she performs

0:08:33.679 --> 0:08:37.680
<v Speaker 2>healthily and successfully at a very high level night after night.

0:08:38.000 --> 0:08:41.440
<v Speaker 2>I think using the word healthily for all of these

0:08:41.440 --> 0:08:45.800
<v Speaker 2>sources from her team is very telling in what they

0:08:45.800 --> 0:08:48.360
<v Speaker 2>are also trying to address the scrutiny and what everyone

0:08:48.440 --> 0:08:49.440
<v Speaker 2>was saying about her body.

0:08:49.640 --> 0:08:52.400
<v Speaker 3>Has the tour been broadly a success? Because there's such

0:08:52.440 --> 0:08:56.640
<v Speaker 3>an interesting dynamic right now right between basically Taylor Swift

0:08:56.720 --> 0:08:59.600
<v Speaker 3>and every other artist is finding that it's impossible to

0:09:00.640 --> 0:09:03.440
<v Speaker 3>get bums on seats for their tours. Has her tour

0:09:03.520 --> 0:09:04.720
<v Speaker 3>been broadly a success?

0:09:04.840 --> 0:09:07.080
<v Speaker 2>Ther tour has been very successful. She isn't in like

0:09:07.120 --> 0:09:10.240
<v Speaker 2>the massive, biggest stadiums like a Taylor Swift, but it's

0:09:10.280 --> 0:09:14.160
<v Speaker 2>been very successful. And everything I've seen on TikTok, and

0:09:14.200 --> 0:09:16.679
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if this is my algorithm in particular,

0:09:17.040 --> 0:09:21.079
<v Speaker 2>are all clips of her tour and people very excited

0:09:21.080 --> 0:09:23.440
<v Speaker 2>to be there, praising her work, saying they're so glad

0:09:23.480 --> 0:09:28.200
<v Speaker 2>she's back on stage, even showing her running across stage

0:09:28.240 --> 0:09:30.800
<v Speaker 2>and showing that what her sources are saying that she

0:09:30.920 --> 0:09:34.839
<v Speaker 2>is performing really really well. And I think it's also

0:09:34.920 --> 0:09:38.160
<v Speaker 2>about everyone enjoying her old music and very excited for

0:09:38.200 --> 0:09:41.360
<v Speaker 2>her after wicked putting out new music, that there is

0:09:41.440 --> 0:09:44.319
<v Speaker 2>a huge part of a fan base that aren't talking

0:09:44.360 --> 0:09:46.360
<v Speaker 2>about her body in the way that other people are.

0:09:46.559 --> 0:09:49.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah right, maybe not fans so much. What's interesting about

0:09:49.720 --> 0:09:54.200
<v Speaker 3>that statement to me is that it almost it's saying, look,

0:09:54.280 --> 0:09:58.680
<v Speaker 3>she's fine, but all of you talking about her is

0:09:58.720 --> 0:10:00.920
<v Speaker 3>what she needs to take a break. That's what the

0:10:00.960 --> 0:10:03.959
<v Speaker 3>work of saying Healthily twice is doing, and saying she's

0:10:04.000 --> 0:10:07.959
<v Speaker 3>not got any problems, but you are making problems for her.

0:10:08.679 --> 0:10:12.440
<v Speaker 1>Yes, that's exactly what they're saying. It's become the conversation

0:10:12.559 --> 0:10:15.480
<v Speaker 1>around her body has got to a pitch and a

0:10:15.559 --> 0:10:19.960
<v Speaker 1>level that she cannot be put in public like in

0:10:19.960 --> 0:10:22.520
<v Speaker 1>the way that this video, you know, the Pedal video

0:10:22.559 --> 0:10:28.000
<v Speaker 1>did without everybody just exploding about it. Charlie Howard, her comments,

0:10:28.000 --> 0:10:31.400
<v Speaker 1>for example, were, I think it's absolutely appalling from both

0:10:31.440 --> 0:10:35.040
<v Speaker 1>a moral and capitalistic standpoint to have released these videos

0:10:35.040 --> 0:10:38.599
<v Speaker 1>and an album when this person needs psychiatric help and hospitalization.

0:10:38.760 --> 0:10:39.800
<v Speaker 3>Who's Charlie Howard?

0:10:40.040 --> 0:10:44.480
<v Speaker 1>So she's a body positivity activist And Jamila Jamil said

0:10:44.520 --> 0:10:47.840
<v Speaker 1>something very similar. She said her team are thoroughly irresponsible

0:10:47.880 --> 0:10:50.679
<v Speaker 1>for not guiding her away from this deeply damaging image.

0:10:50.679 --> 0:10:54.400
<v Speaker 1>For her young fans to see so glamorized. It's so

0:10:54.520 --> 0:10:57.560
<v Speaker 1>interesting because and this is what we discussed last time,

0:10:57.720 --> 0:11:00.440
<v Speaker 1>is that there's an element of this kind of commentary

0:11:00.440 --> 0:11:05.280
<v Speaker 1>that I find very concerned, trolly, very much like we

0:11:05.320 --> 0:11:07.160
<v Speaker 1>want to talk about your body, but we want to

0:11:07.240 --> 0:11:08.959
<v Speaker 1>dress it up as a way that we're really really

0:11:09.000 --> 0:11:11.920
<v Speaker 1>worried about you. But then the flip side to that

0:11:12.080 --> 0:11:16.280
<v Speaker 1>argument is what Jamille is saying there, that it's irresponsible

0:11:16.600 --> 0:11:22.320
<v Speaker 1>to celebrate and idolize somebody so thin. Yeah, it's really

0:11:22.360 --> 0:11:26.480
<v Speaker 1>complicated because I wonder it's being sort of heralded a

0:11:26.480 --> 0:11:28.640
<v Speaker 1>little bit, the fact that she her team have released

0:11:28.640 --> 0:11:31.200
<v Speaker 1>this statement saying she's stepping back. It's being sort of

0:11:31.240 --> 0:11:34.160
<v Speaker 1>heralded as a good thing by those in that we're

0:11:34.200 --> 0:11:36.840
<v Speaker 1>worried about her camp, right? Is that good? She's going

0:11:36.920 --> 0:11:39.160
<v Speaker 1>to get the help she needs. But the language of

0:11:39.200 --> 0:11:41.840
<v Speaker 1>the statement, as you've just pointed out, Amelia, is more like,

0:11:42.080 --> 0:11:44.719
<v Speaker 1>you guys have made us do this, and can you

0:11:45.120 --> 0:11:48.200
<v Speaker 1>bully someone into getting help? And inverted commas experts would

0:11:48.200 --> 0:11:48.959
<v Speaker 1>say no, you can't.

0:11:49.080 --> 0:11:51.360
<v Speaker 3>Well, and the other thing to mention here is that

0:11:51.440 --> 0:11:54.440
<v Speaker 3>the message of the pedal video, there's a lot of

0:11:54.480 --> 0:11:58.200
<v Speaker 3>anger in that video. Obviously she literally gets out the chainsaw.

0:11:58.280 --> 0:12:01.320
<v Speaker 3>But I think that one message you can take from

0:12:01.360 --> 0:12:04.240
<v Speaker 3>that video is that she is angry at her fans,

0:12:04.360 --> 0:12:08.800
<v Speaker 3>or at least the public generally, because as mentioned, there's

0:12:08.840 --> 0:12:12.160
<v Speaker 3>a moment in the video where these kind of entertainment

0:12:12.240 --> 0:12:15.680
<v Speaker 3>haunt shows say we want the old you, and she's

0:12:15.760 --> 0:12:18.520
<v Speaker 3>saying in that video, I've changed and you can't deal

0:12:18.559 --> 0:12:21.360
<v Speaker 3>with it, which is similar to what the statement is.

0:12:21.440 --> 0:12:24.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, she's I mean, she's made public statements in the past,

0:12:24.240 --> 0:12:27.160
<v Speaker 1>because the commentary about her body has been going on

0:12:27.240 --> 0:12:29.800
<v Speaker 1>for years obviously reached a sort of fever pitch around

0:12:29.800 --> 0:12:33.960
<v Speaker 1>Wicked and then again around this tour. But she's come

0:12:34.000 --> 0:12:36.440
<v Speaker 1>out before and said just stop it, stop talking about it.

0:12:36.440 --> 0:12:39.880
<v Speaker 1>It's not helpful, it's not healthy. It feels like the

0:12:39.960 --> 0:12:44.560
<v Speaker 1>discourse has just gotten has just overtaken that, as well as.

0:12:44.440 --> 0:12:47.840
<v Speaker 2>The timing of the statement, like knowing that the statement

0:12:47.880 --> 0:12:50.880
<v Speaker 2>has come out here in early August and the tour

0:12:50.920 --> 0:12:54.199
<v Speaker 2>finishes early September, so there's still a whole month of

0:12:54.200 --> 0:12:57.520
<v Speaker 2>her being in the public, and from the footages I've

0:12:57.520 --> 0:12:59.880
<v Speaker 2>seen of her tour so far, they also seem very

0:13:00.440 --> 0:13:03.520
<v Speaker 2>deeply emotional, like there's parts where she's like crying and

0:13:03.559 --> 0:13:05.720
<v Speaker 2>she's overcome with emotion and she's so happy to be

0:13:05.840 --> 0:13:07.760
<v Speaker 2>there and she can't believe so many people have come

0:13:07.800 --> 0:13:11.120
<v Speaker 2>to watch her. And I think this like it if

0:13:11.160 --> 0:13:14.920
<v Speaker 2>you are attending a concert between now until it ends,

0:13:15.280 --> 0:13:17.719
<v Speaker 2>I feel like you would feel really sad, Like it's

0:13:17.760 --> 0:13:21.040
<v Speaker 2>just going to be a very sad concert because of

0:13:21.120 --> 0:13:23.120
<v Speaker 2>knowing what's going to happen after, where she's going to

0:13:23.200 --> 0:13:25.560
<v Speaker 2>leave the spotlight and you won't see her again. So

0:13:25.640 --> 0:13:28.560
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if it's like her team using the

0:13:28.800 --> 0:13:32.040
<v Speaker 2>time we have left with her unquote left with her

0:13:32.400 --> 0:13:35.280
<v Speaker 2>as a way to kind of make people feel really

0:13:35.280 --> 0:13:37.920
<v Speaker 2>bad for having all of this public scrutiny about her.

0:13:38.160 --> 0:13:40.319
<v Speaker 3>And also, of course the concerts are always going to

0:13:40.320 --> 0:13:42.840
<v Speaker 3>be overlaid with emotion for her because of what she

0:13:43.280 --> 0:13:47.720
<v Speaker 3>and everyone who went to see her in Manchester went through.

0:13:48.000 --> 0:13:52.320
<v Speaker 3>And I think whenever we talk about Ariana Grande, it's

0:13:52.600 --> 0:13:55.880
<v Speaker 3>kind of strange to me that we don't always mention

0:13:56.200 --> 0:14:00.199
<v Speaker 3>that enormous traumatic event that happened to her and her

0:14:00.200 --> 0:14:04.040
<v Speaker 3>fans yea, and how that must be informing that doesn't

0:14:04.080 --> 0:14:06.199
<v Speaker 3>just go away, the memory of what happened to her.

0:14:06.240 --> 0:14:10.000
<v Speaker 1>Then twenty seventeen, it was a terrorist attack on her

0:14:10.080 --> 0:14:13.440
<v Speaker 1>arena performance in Manchester that killed twenty two of her fans,

0:14:13.720 --> 0:14:18.520
<v Speaker 1>and then the following year her longtime boyfriend on off

0:14:18.559 --> 0:14:22.520
<v Speaker 1>boyfriend died of a drug overdose. She is like a

0:14:22.600 --> 0:14:26.400
<v Speaker 1>She's become a sort of symbol of resilience, a little

0:14:26.400 --> 0:14:29.720
<v Speaker 1>bit tragedy tinged, as many of the divas always are

0:14:29.800 --> 0:14:31.400
<v Speaker 1>in a way, you know, And when I say diva there,

0:14:31.400 --> 0:14:33.840
<v Speaker 1>I literally mean a singing diva, not a you know,

0:14:34.160 --> 0:14:37.200
<v Speaker 1>she's being a diva often are, and she has become

0:14:37.360 --> 0:14:40.680
<v Speaker 1>that sort of symbol. I just I find it so

0:14:40.720 --> 0:14:44.560
<v Speaker 1>interesting because objectively you can't look at her and think

0:14:44.600 --> 0:14:47.360
<v Speaker 1>she looks healthy. But then on the other hand, I

0:14:47.440 --> 0:14:49.760
<v Speaker 1>really push against the idea that we really know what's

0:14:49.800 --> 0:14:52.720
<v Speaker 1>going on with somebody and whether or not they have,

0:14:52.880 --> 0:14:56.880
<v Speaker 1>as Jamille is suggesting, as Charlie Howard is suggesting, a

0:14:57.000 --> 0:14:59.680
<v Speaker 1>really serious mental health condition. You can't diagnose that from

0:14:59.680 --> 0:14:59.960
<v Speaker 1>the out.

0:15:00.440 --> 0:15:02.240
<v Speaker 3>But do you think that, and do you think that

0:15:02.280 --> 0:15:04.720
<v Speaker 3>the Jamila's and the Charlie's of the world are going

0:15:04.800 --> 0:15:07.840
<v Speaker 3>to feel like, okay, fine, A to your earlier point, Holly,

0:15:07.960 --> 0:15:10.160
<v Speaker 3>you've done what we asked you to do. All we

0:15:10.200 --> 0:15:12.560
<v Speaker 3>wanted you to do is take some time off, stop

0:15:12.640 --> 0:15:16.440
<v Speaker 3>making money off your pain, and go away for a bit.

0:15:16.520 --> 0:15:17.960
<v Speaker 3>I mean, do you think they feel vindicated.

0:15:18.080 --> 0:15:21.000
<v Speaker 1>I think they will feel vindicated because I think that,

0:15:21.160 --> 0:15:25.200
<v Speaker 1>as I say, the sort of the public service element

0:15:25.200 --> 0:15:28.480
<v Speaker 1>of this discussion. So interestingly, Jamala Jaimil said, how talking

0:15:28.520 --> 0:15:30.240
<v Speaker 1>about this is a bit of a trolley problem. You know,

0:15:30.240 --> 0:15:33.280
<v Speaker 1>the trolley The trolley dilemma is the idea that if

0:15:33.800 --> 0:15:36.440
<v Speaker 1>a runaway tram was running towards people and you could

0:15:36.440 --> 0:15:38.000
<v Speaker 1>pull a lever, that it would only hit one or

0:15:38.000 --> 0:15:40.320
<v Speaker 1>it would hit ten. Would you pull the lever right?

0:15:40.360 --> 0:15:43.560
<v Speaker 1>That's the idea of the trolley problem, And Jamila Jamil

0:15:43.640 --> 0:15:46.200
<v Speaker 1>says the shrinking pop star situation is something of a

0:15:46.240 --> 0:15:48.520
<v Speaker 1>trolley problem. If we comment on her body, we could

0:15:48.520 --> 0:15:51.120
<v Speaker 1>harm her mental health, which would be awful, and nobody

0:15:51.120 --> 0:15:53.480
<v Speaker 1>wants that. If we don't comment on her body, we

0:15:53.560 --> 0:15:56.040
<v Speaker 1>run the risk of normalizing that image to hundreds of

0:15:56.040 --> 0:15:59.920
<v Speaker 1>millions of teenage girls, kids, and even impressionable adults consuming her.

0:16:00.520 --> 0:16:04.520
<v Speaker 1>So I guess they would say that we've managed to

0:16:04.800 --> 0:16:06.800
<v Speaker 1>raise the discourse to a level where she had to

0:16:06.840 --> 0:16:09.200
<v Speaker 1>address it and it had to be addressed. A lot

0:16:09.240 --> 0:16:11.720
<v Speaker 1>of people have said, it's her team, this is so cynical.

0:16:11.720 --> 0:16:14.440
<v Speaker 1>They're making money from her. But that assumes a lot

0:16:14.480 --> 0:16:16.960
<v Speaker 1>of bad will and ill will on behalf of her family,

0:16:17.520 --> 0:16:23.240
<v Speaker 1>her team, her friends, which is probably unfairly placed. But

0:16:23.280 --> 0:16:25.840
<v Speaker 1>I think that yes, these commentators would see this as

0:16:25.840 --> 0:16:28.920
<v Speaker 1>a positive step to your point, though, em there's a

0:16:28.960 --> 0:16:30.920
<v Speaker 1>month to go between now and then, and I would

0:16:30.960 --> 0:16:34.920
<v Speaker 1>not want to be Ariana Grande with this much scrutiny

0:16:35.000 --> 0:16:36.880
<v Speaker 1>on every single thing you do at all.

0:16:36.920 --> 0:16:41.080
<v Speaker 3>It's curious timing for sure. After the break, are you

0:16:41.160 --> 0:16:46.000
<v Speaker 3>a sale or an anchor? John Cena is a delightful man.

0:16:46.040 --> 0:16:48.320
<v Speaker 3>You probably don't even know how you know him. He's

0:16:48.360 --> 0:16:50.520
<v Speaker 3>been in a few movies. He was in train Wreck,

0:16:50.640 --> 0:16:55.320
<v Speaker 3>he was a merman in Barbie. He had an illustrious

0:16:55.400 --> 0:16:58.960
<v Speaker 3>wrestling career. No one for an internet meme. You can't

0:16:59.000 --> 0:17:01.000
<v Speaker 3>see me bring you with anyone.

0:17:01.360 --> 0:17:03.600
<v Speaker 2>He's very into big action movies.

0:17:03.840 --> 0:17:05.879
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I don't think I've ever seen him in a

0:17:05.920 --> 0:17:07.760
<v Speaker 1>movie except for Barbie, but I've seen him in a

0:17:07.760 --> 0:17:08.400
<v Speaker 1>million means.

0:17:08.440 --> 0:17:11.800
<v Speaker 3>He's got great energy. He just seems like a good dude. Anyway.

0:17:11.840 --> 0:17:15.400
<v Speaker 3>He was recently on Amy Poehler's Good Hang, and he

0:17:15.440 --> 0:17:18.720
<v Speaker 3>put forward a theory about how it's about the energy

0:17:18.720 --> 0:17:20.359
<v Speaker 3>you put out in the world and how you relate

0:17:20.359 --> 0:17:22.520
<v Speaker 3>to other people, and he said that everyone is either

0:17:22.560 --> 0:17:25.359
<v Speaker 3>an anchor or a sale. I'm going to play two

0:17:25.440 --> 0:17:28.800
<v Speaker 3>clips from their conversation. In the first clip, he's talking

0:17:28.840 --> 0:17:32.399
<v Speaker 3>about his hometown called West Newbury. It's a town in

0:17:32.440 --> 0:17:34.720
<v Speaker 3>New England, and that's a region in the US no

0:17:34.760 --> 0:17:37.440
<v Speaker 3>one for its straight talk. They don't sort of beat

0:17:37.480 --> 0:17:40.160
<v Speaker 3>around the bush there. And then in the second clip,

0:17:40.200 --> 0:17:43.040
<v Speaker 3>he's talking about his friendship with Paula Pell, who was

0:17:43.119 --> 0:17:46.560
<v Speaker 3>a comedian with whom he appeared in the movie Sisters.

0:17:47.240 --> 0:17:49.920
<v Speaker 4>Because my brothers are all hitting that like late forties,

0:17:49.920 --> 0:17:53.440
<v Speaker 4>approaching the half century now, and we all have wisdom

0:17:53.560 --> 0:17:57.159
<v Speaker 4>of like, man, it's kind of a shitty mindset if

0:17:57.160 --> 0:18:00.160
<v Speaker 4>somebody's like, hey, that's life and you're like, it's taken forever.

0:18:01.440 --> 0:18:01.760
<v Speaker 5>Like that.

0:18:02.359 --> 0:18:05.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but that's also West Newbery totally.

0:18:05.600 --> 0:18:09.480
<v Speaker 4>And man, as beautiful as the landscape is, sometimes there's

0:18:09.520 --> 0:18:12.040
<v Speaker 4>a lot more anchors than sales over there.

0:18:12.520 --> 0:18:14.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, what's so great about Paula What do you

0:18:14.520 --> 0:18:15.160
<v Speaker 1>like about her?

0:18:15.359 --> 0:18:21.000
<v Speaker 4>I like her, her perspective. I love her courage, man, Like,

0:18:21.280 --> 0:18:24.320
<v Speaker 4>I just like that energy. I like, again I say

0:18:24.359 --> 0:18:27.520
<v Speaker 4>anchors and sales, she's a sale, yeah, you know, like

0:18:28.000 --> 0:18:32.520
<v Speaker 4>always curious, always creative, off the wall. Yeah, I just know.

0:18:32.880 --> 0:18:36.520
<v Speaker 4>I know any idea is going to have like that whimsy,

0:18:36.600 --> 0:18:39.000
<v Speaker 4>that magic in it. Yeah, And I want to be

0:18:39.040 --> 0:18:39.720
<v Speaker 4>with those people.

0:18:40.400 --> 0:18:42.159
<v Speaker 3>So what I think is interesting here I think I

0:18:42.240 --> 0:18:44.800
<v Speaker 3>kind of disagree with John Seyer a little bit because

0:18:44.840 --> 0:18:48.119
<v Speaker 3>what Hayes seems to be saying is that anchors are

0:18:48.160 --> 0:18:51.280
<v Speaker 3>always bad. They're always dragging you down. I guess literally,

0:18:51.480 --> 0:18:55.560
<v Speaker 3>they're always negative and they're kind of curmudgeonally. And then

0:18:55.760 --> 0:18:58.520
<v Speaker 3>sales are just people you always want to be around

0:18:58.560 --> 0:19:01.840
<v Speaker 3>because they're always propelling you forward and encouraging you. But

0:19:02.040 --> 0:19:04.440
<v Speaker 3>I think it's a bit more complicated than that, because

0:19:04.680 --> 0:19:07.200
<v Speaker 3>I don't know a lot about boats. And I asked

0:19:07.200 --> 0:19:09.359
<v Speaker 3>you if you knew anything about sailing before this, and

0:19:09.400 --> 0:19:11.880
<v Speaker 3>you told me that you knew everything about sailing from

0:19:11.880 --> 0:19:12.440
<v Speaker 3>the Odyssey.

0:19:12.520 --> 0:19:12.680
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:19:13.480 --> 0:19:17.760
<v Speaker 3>But my understanding is that boats require both anchors and

0:19:17.960 --> 0:19:19.120
<v Speaker 3>sales to function.

0:19:19.359 --> 0:19:19.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:19:19.640 --> 0:19:20.119
<v Speaker 3>So true.

0:19:20.200 --> 0:19:24.760
<v Speaker 2>So I look this up and on AI and the

0:19:24.800 --> 0:19:28.480
<v Speaker 2>AI told me, so sail catches the wind embraces change

0:19:28.520 --> 0:19:33.160
<v Speaker 2>and move towards new horizons. Anchors hold firmly against storms,

0:19:33.200 --> 0:19:35.639
<v Speaker 2>provide safety and prevents drifting.

0:19:35.800 --> 0:19:38.479
<v Speaker 3>Did you type into AI what is an anchor and

0:19:38.520 --> 0:19:40.720
<v Speaker 3>what is a saiale? Because I think that's one of

0:19:40.760 --> 0:19:43.000
<v Speaker 3>those moments where the AI is just like these humans,

0:19:43.080 --> 0:19:45.040
<v Speaker 3>I can't wait to replace them too much.

0:19:45.440 --> 0:19:48.440
<v Speaker 2>And I was probably like, she really loves the Odyssey,

0:19:48.800 --> 0:19:50.600
<v Speaker 2>because what I will say was the Odyssey is that

0:19:50.600 --> 0:19:52.240
<v Speaker 2>they had a lot of sails and they needed some

0:19:53.080 --> 0:19:55.120
<v Speaker 2>because they've gone to all the wrong islands.

0:19:56.240 --> 0:19:59.439
<v Speaker 1>This is so interesting. So his reading of this is

0:19:59.440 --> 0:20:02.680
<v Speaker 1>that anchor is trying to drag you down hold. Now,

0:20:02.720 --> 0:20:05.800
<v Speaker 1>successful Hollywood people are always telling this story. I had

0:20:05.800 --> 0:20:09.000
<v Speaker 1>to leave my hometown because everyone in my hometown was

0:20:09.080 --> 0:20:11.679
<v Speaker 1>just telling me work in the local store. You'll be

0:20:11.760 --> 0:20:16.800
<v Speaker 1>going exactly I'm about to say. So people love that story.

0:20:16.800 --> 0:20:18.480
<v Speaker 1>They're like, I had to leave that place because I

0:20:18.520 --> 0:20:21.000
<v Speaker 1>needed to go to a place of possibility. I could

0:20:21.000 --> 0:20:23.600
<v Speaker 1>tell my story that way. I grew up in the

0:20:23.640 --> 0:20:26.720
<v Speaker 1>north of England where it rains all the time and peoples,

0:20:26.800 --> 0:20:30.440
<v Speaker 1>as famously talked about on the pod our slogan, is

0:20:30.480 --> 0:20:34.840
<v Speaker 1>it's the hope that kills you. You should always expect

0:20:35.440 --> 0:20:40.760
<v Speaker 1>either the worst or just more of the same. Really,

0:20:40.960 --> 0:20:43.280
<v Speaker 1>it's probably better to just not go outside because you're

0:20:43.280 --> 0:20:46.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna get wet right now. That would be an unfair

0:20:46.160 --> 0:20:49.320
<v Speaker 1>characterization of my hometown, which is actually a bed of

0:20:49.400 --> 0:20:52.520
<v Speaker 1>much creativity. But I get it. I get that idea.

0:20:52.600 --> 0:20:55.919
<v Speaker 1>If you've pulled away from that and gone to sunny

0:20:55.920 --> 0:20:59.520
<v Speaker 1>California to seek your fortune or sunny Sydney to seek

0:20:59.560 --> 0:21:02.720
<v Speaker 1>your fortune, you're like, I had to get away from

0:21:02.800 --> 0:21:05.800
<v Speaker 1>those people. But I agree with you that actually it's

0:21:05.880 --> 0:21:08.359
<v Speaker 1>much more complicated than that. You need a bit of both,

0:21:08.480 --> 0:21:09.159
<v Speaker 1>don't you.

0:21:09.280 --> 0:21:12.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, here's like, here's an illustration of why you need both.

0:21:12.400 --> 0:21:15.520
<v Speaker 3>You know, sometimes you'll go shopping with a friend and

0:21:15.560 --> 0:21:19.160
<v Speaker 3>you'll put on something that looks objectively terrible. But I'm

0:21:19.240 --> 0:21:22.560
<v Speaker 3>a little bit guilty of this. I get excited by shopping.

0:21:22.640 --> 0:21:24.840
<v Speaker 3>Maybe I get a bit over excited. Maybe I egg

0:21:24.920 --> 0:21:28.120
<v Speaker 3>people on a little bit just because it's fun. And

0:21:28.480 --> 0:21:31.560
<v Speaker 3>maybe you kind of want an anchor in those situations

0:21:31.560 --> 0:21:34.119
<v Speaker 3>instead of the sale. You want someone who's like, those

0:21:34.359 --> 0:21:37.280
<v Speaker 3>those stripes are doing you no favors, you know, like,

0:21:37.440 --> 0:21:40.679
<v Speaker 3>rather than someone who just tells you, yeah, I just sorry,

0:21:41.720 --> 0:21:42.360
<v Speaker 3>we do that.

0:21:43.680 --> 0:21:50.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm just That's why I said, stripe, I love that.

0:21:50.880 --> 0:21:51.360
<v Speaker 1>To keep it in.

0:21:53.520 --> 0:21:57.200
<v Speaker 3>I don't want it, okay, Anyway, I was not talking

0:21:57.200 --> 0:21:57.840
<v Speaker 3>about you there.

0:21:57.920 --> 0:22:01.800
<v Speaker 1>I was looking at for people who were just listening

0:22:01.800 --> 0:22:05.600
<v Speaker 1>and not watching this. They're both wearing stripes, and.

0:22:05.600 --> 0:22:08.240
<v Speaker 3>Am your stripes look so nice? For the records? You

0:22:08.359 --> 0:22:12.560
<v Speaker 3>so much? So you sometimes don't You don't want someone

0:22:12.600 --> 0:22:14.320
<v Speaker 3>to ex you on. You want someone who tells you

0:22:14.359 --> 0:22:14.760
<v Speaker 3>the truth.

0:22:15.280 --> 0:22:20.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so a sale is the one saying by the

0:22:20.800 --> 0:22:28.040
<v Speaker 1>stripe is like try spots? Is that the idea?

0:22:28.200 --> 0:22:32.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah? So? I think in relationships sometimes you need a

0:22:32.280 --> 0:22:36.120
<v Speaker 3>bit of grounding energy, you need a bit of honesty. Maybe. Look,

0:22:36.160 --> 0:22:39.240
<v Speaker 3>I sometimes dream up these crazy plans that I should

0:22:39.240 --> 0:22:42.159
<v Speaker 3>not execute, and I go to friends who I know

0:22:42.240 --> 0:22:44.480
<v Speaker 3>are gonna give me a little bit of a reality

0:22:44.600 --> 0:22:45.200
<v Speaker 3>check on it.

0:22:45.920 --> 0:22:46.680
<v Speaker 1>That's so interesting.

0:22:46.680 --> 0:22:50.880
<v Speaker 2>I think I'm a sale professionally, but an anchor person.

0:22:51.320 --> 0:22:52.760
<v Speaker 1>How do you mean?

0:22:52.840 --> 0:22:55.040
<v Speaker 2>I think when I'm looking at work, I see myself

0:22:55.040 --> 0:22:57.520
<v Speaker 2>as a sale because I like love doing new things.

0:22:57.760 --> 0:23:00.280
<v Speaker 2>I don't really like doing the same thing every day.

0:23:00.600 --> 0:23:03.200
<v Speaker 2>I want to experience new things. I'm up for a challenge.

0:23:03.280 --> 0:23:06.159
<v Speaker 2>I want to just like travel the world in terms

0:23:06.240 --> 0:23:08.840
<v Speaker 2>of work, whereas in my personal life, I feel like,

0:23:08.920 --> 0:23:12.200
<v Speaker 2>especially when I look at my my friendships, I feel

0:23:12.200 --> 0:23:15.480
<v Speaker 2>like I'm an anchor who's friends with a lot of sales.

0:23:15.800 --> 0:23:18.240
<v Speaker 2>Like I'm the kind of friend I need like stability,

0:23:18.359 --> 0:23:22.240
<v Speaker 2>I need repetition, I need safety, Like I'm a big

0:23:22.800 --> 0:23:25.920
<v Speaker 2>believer in like clubs like book club, sports clubs, something

0:23:25.920 --> 0:23:28.119
<v Speaker 2>that we can do every week for the end of time,

0:23:28.520 --> 0:23:30.159
<v Speaker 2>because a lot of my friends are very much like,

0:23:30.359 --> 0:23:32.360
<v Speaker 2>let's get dinner on Monday. And then in my head,

0:23:32.400 --> 0:23:34.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm like, oh, that means we're going to get dinners

0:23:34.240 --> 0:23:36.719
<v Speaker 2>on Monday all the time. And they're like, oh no,

0:23:36.760 --> 0:23:39.200
<v Speaker 2>we're done with Mondays. Let's do something and they're like no,

0:23:39.320 --> 0:23:41.000
<v Speaker 2>And does that mean you don't like it when your

0:23:41.000 --> 0:23:44.159
<v Speaker 2>friends change on you? Like so if they decide that

0:23:44.200 --> 0:23:47.679
<v Speaker 2>they no longer want to a club, book club, or

0:23:48.080 --> 0:23:50.320
<v Speaker 2>why would you go there or live there or date

0:23:50.359 --> 0:23:55.959
<v Speaker 2>that person when friends move away? No, you are literally

0:23:55.960 --> 0:24:00.000
<v Speaker 2>the actor I will follow you.

0:24:02.359 --> 0:24:03.960
<v Speaker 1>Are you an anchor or a sale Amelia?

0:24:04.119 --> 0:24:07.160
<v Speaker 3>I think it depends on the situation and the relationship, right,

0:24:07.359 --> 0:24:09.800
<v Speaker 3>Like as I mentioned, look, I'll get over excited on

0:24:09.840 --> 0:24:12.160
<v Speaker 3>a shopping trip for sure, and become a little bit

0:24:12.200 --> 0:24:14.760
<v Speaker 3>too much of a sale. I think my friends would

0:24:14.960 --> 0:24:18.160
<v Speaker 3>describe me that way in negative terms in terms of shopping,

0:24:18.480 --> 0:24:21.840
<v Speaker 3>But I think that in a professional setting, a bit

0:24:21.880 --> 0:24:25.359
<v Speaker 3>of anchor energy is good, Yeah, just to like ensure

0:24:25.400 --> 0:24:28.720
<v Speaker 3>people don't get carried away, right exactly. I was very

0:24:28.720 --> 0:24:30.560
<v Speaker 3>curious about how you classify yourself.

0:24:31.480 --> 0:24:33.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what do you tell me?

0:24:33.640 --> 0:24:36.280
<v Speaker 3>You tell me, well, you've obviously got some man cunion

0:24:36.440 --> 0:24:37.399
<v Speaker 3>anchor about you.

0:24:37.560 --> 0:24:41.640
<v Speaker 1>I do, and I tend to stay in a workplace

0:24:41.680 --> 0:24:45.040
<v Speaker 1>a long time. I don't flit around, although I have

0:24:45.160 --> 0:24:47.920
<v Speaker 1>flitted around between jobs in this workplace for a long time,

0:24:48.000 --> 0:24:50.439
<v Speaker 1>but I've been I do, and I do quite like

0:24:50.480 --> 0:24:55.760
<v Speaker 1>a routine. But I'm also a very itchy sagittarian in

0:24:55.800 --> 0:24:59.080
<v Speaker 1>that I hate feeling anchored, like I hate it.

0:24:59.160 --> 0:25:02.440
<v Speaker 3>And you don't like feeling tracked or surveyed, and anchors

0:25:02.560 --> 0:25:03.679
<v Speaker 3>like a little bit of tracking.

0:25:03.760 --> 0:25:06.359
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I don't like feeling tracked or surveyed, and I

0:25:06.440 --> 0:25:09.360
<v Speaker 1>don't like I don't like everything to be too planned out.

0:25:09.359 --> 0:25:10.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm the opposite of you in that way that when

0:25:11.000 --> 0:25:12.639
<v Speaker 1>my friends are like, we need to book that weekend

0:25:12.680 --> 0:25:16.520
<v Speaker 1>in October. I'm like, whaty no, no, no, no, which

0:25:16.560 --> 0:25:20.520
<v Speaker 1>country I'll be. I am such a free spirit even

0:25:20.520 --> 0:25:22.760
<v Speaker 1>though I will be doing exactly what I'm doing now

0:25:22.840 --> 0:25:27.359
<v Speaker 1>in Octager. So I think that I'm probably both, but

0:25:27.480 --> 0:25:31.840
<v Speaker 1>I understand the I think I'm probably more of a sale.

0:25:31.880 --> 0:25:33.040
<v Speaker 1>I think I probably I.

0:25:32.960 --> 0:25:35.879
<v Speaker 2>Think you're an anchor when it's like your own anchor, Like,

0:25:35.920 --> 0:25:38.800
<v Speaker 2>it can't be someone else's anchor that's impeding on your life.

0:25:38.800 --> 0:25:40.920
<v Speaker 2>It has to be you put that anchor there yourself

0:25:41.280 --> 0:25:46.560
<v Speaker 2>and you like that. Oh, we're getting very nautical, John Cena.

0:25:46.680 --> 0:25:48.600
<v Speaker 2>So wise it's.

0:25:48.400 --> 0:25:52.280
<v Speaker 3>The true crime case, which would be anyone's absolute worst nightmare.

0:25:52.480 --> 0:25:55.880
<v Speaker 3>And now there is a tragic update. So we've spoken

0:25:55.880 --> 0:25:59.400
<v Speaker 3>on the show. Incredibly enough, it was six months ago

0:25:59.760 --> 0:26:03.119
<v Speaker 3>that the US Morning TV and Casavannah Guthrie's eighty four

0:26:03.200 --> 0:26:06.840
<v Speaker 3>year old mum, Nancy, went missing. She was taken from

0:26:06.880 --> 0:26:10.080
<v Speaker 3>her bed in Tucson, Arizona. It was middle of the night,

0:26:10.200 --> 0:26:12.480
<v Speaker 3>and we now know she was taken by at least

0:26:12.600 --> 0:26:16.800
<v Speaker 3>one masked intruder. Nancy had a bad back and a

0:26:16.800 --> 0:26:21.240
<v Speaker 3>heart condition, and since then, in that six months, we've

0:26:21.240 --> 0:26:25.280
<v Speaker 3>basically gotten no real developments on the case. There have

0:26:25.320 --> 0:26:28.840
<v Speaker 3>been various updates. So, for instance, Savannah returned to host

0:26:28.840 --> 0:26:31.399
<v Speaker 3>The Today Show on April sixth, and we talked about that,

0:26:31.560 --> 0:26:33.720
<v Speaker 3>or you talked about that on this show and how

0:26:33.760 --> 0:26:36.639
<v Speaker 3>hard that must have been for her. And then in

0:26:36.680 --> 0:26:38.840
<v Speaker 3>the last few days came what I would say is

0:26:38.880 --> 0:26:42.720
<v Speaker 3>probably the biggest development in the case since she originally

0:26:42.800 --> 0:26:46.199
<v Speaker 3>went missing, which is that the authorities released two of

0:26:46.240 --> 0:26:50.440
<v Speaker 3>the notes that were purportedly sent by Nancy's kidnappers, which

0:26:50.480 --> 0:26:53.000
<v Speaker 3>have not been released to the public, even though they

0:26:53.040 --> 0:26:56.080
<v Speaker 3>actually came a long time ago. So the first of

0:26:56.119 --> 0:26:58.760
<v Speaker 3>these notes was an online message that was sent to

0:26:58.840 --> 0:27:03.000
<v Speaker 3>the local TV state in Tucson on the Monday after

0:27:03.040 --> 0:27:04.879
<v Speaker 3>she went missing. She went missing on a Sunday. This

0:27:04.960 --> 0:27:07.560
<v Speaker 3>note was sent on a Monday from an encrypted URL

0:27:08.040 --> 0:27:10.720
<v Speaker 3>and it began, because again these notes have been released

0:27:10.720 --> 0:27:14.080
<v Speaker 3>now to the public. Hello Savannah, we have your mother Nancy.

0:27:14.920 --> 0:27:18.600
<v Speaker 3>It demanded five million US dollars in bitcoin, and it

0:27:18.640 --> 0:27:21.159
<v Speaker 3>gave them a week to get that money together, and

0:27:21.200 --> 0:27:23.480
<v Speaker 3>it said that she would be killed. Nancy would be

0:27:23.560 --> 0:27:26.280
<v Speaker 3>killed if the money was not received in time. That's

0:27:26.320 --> 0:27:28.200
<v Speaker 3>like straight out of a horror Yeah, I mean, let

0:27:28.240 --> 0:27:31.480
<v Speaker 3>that just sink in for a minute. But now we

0:27:31.600 --> 0:27:34.160
<v Speaker 3>know that there was a second note that was sent

0:27:34.520 --> 0:27:38.159
<v Speaker 3>that Friday. So again goes missing on a Sunday. First

0:27:38.359 --> 0:27:41.000
<v Speaker 3>ransom note sent on a Monday. Then this second note

0:27:41.080 --> 0:27:44.119
<v Speaker 3>is sent that Friday. And remember that's a couple of

0:27:44.200 --> 0:27:47.160
<v Speaker 3>days before the ransom deadline. That's a key piece of information.

0:27:47.800 --> 0:27:51.000
<v Speaker 3>This note said we never intended to hurt her. We

0:27:51.080 --> 0:27:54.000
<v Speaker 3>are truly sorry. We did not fully grasp the seriousness

0:27:54.040 --> 0:27:56.320
<v Speaker 3>of her physical condition and that she had passed away,

0:27:57.000 --> 0:27:59.200
<v Speaker 3>and they said that she was buried in nature.

0:28:00.119 --> 0:28:03.280
<v Speaker 1>Do the authorities well, I guess the fact they've released

0:28:03.280 --> 0:28:06.800
<v Speaker 1>them suggests yes, they obviously give full credibility to these.

0:28:06.760 --> 0:28:08.720
<v Speaker 3>Yes they do. I think we are being led to

0:28:08.800 --> 0:28:11.520
<v Speaker 3>understand that they think these are from the actual kidnappers.

0:28:11.640 --> 0:28:15.560
<v Speaker 3>And to highlight one detail here which people have been

0:28:15.600 --> 0:28:20.199
<v Speaker 3>honing in on, the kidnappers sent that second note saying

0:28:20.400 --> 0:28:25.760
<v Speaker 3>she's died before the deadline for the ransom, in other words,

0:28:25.960 --> 0:28:31.560
<v Speaker 3>essentially essentially forfeiting their ransom demand, saying, actually she's died.

0:28:31.640 --> 0:28:34.960
<v Speaker 3>We didn't intend for her to die. And I guess then,

0:28:35.040 --> 0:28:41.040
<v Speaker 3>therefore releasing Savannah and her family from paying the ransom.

0:28:41.320 --> 0:28:45.800
<v Speaker 2>The second note comes across as like creepily kind, which

0:28:45.840 --> 0:28:46.720
<v Speaker 2>weirded me out.

0:28:46.920 --> 0:28:50.560
<v Speaker 3>Well, that's why. So Savannah released a video message last week.

0:28:50.600 --> 0:28:54.040
<v Speaker 3>She's been releasing sort of periodic video messages clearly very

0:28:54.120 --> 0:28:58.760
<v Speaker 3>targeted to the kidnappers, kidnapper or kidnappers all along. Last

0:28:58.760 --> 0:29:00.880
<v Speaker 3>week she released a video that pep were confused by.

0:29:01.400 --> 0:29:03.840
<v Speaker 3>In the video, she said, you have tried to do

0:29:03.880 --> 0:29:08.320
<v Speaker 3>the right thing, and now we ask you to complete

0:29:08.360 --> 0:29:10.960
<v Speaker 3>this and to give us closure. And obviously everyone thought,

0:29:11.000 --> 0:29:13.000
<v Speaker 3>what does she mean you've tried to do the right thing.

0:29:13.360 --> 0:29:17.400
<v Speaker 3>You kidnapped her mother. But now what we understand is

0:29:17.400 --> 0:29:20.160
<v Speaker 3>she's saying, you told us that she died, you were

0:29:20.160 --> 0:29:22.640
<v Speaker 3>no longer asking for the ransom. But now what we

0:29:22.680 --> 0:29:25.080
<v Speaker 3>really need to hear from you is where she is buried.

0:29:25.480 --> 0:29:28.720
<v Speaker 1>Well, it explains obviously why the case kind of went

0:29:28.760 --> 0:29:32.680
<v Speaker 1>away in a way, because it was all over in

0:29:32.720 --> 0:29:35.320
<v Speaker 1>a week. It was all over. When we were talking

0:29:35.320 --> 0:29:39.000
<v Speaker 1>about Savannah recently, Mia was talking about the incredible stoicism

0:29:39.040 --> 0:29:42.360
<v Speaker 1>of being able to go back to work and what

0:29:42.520 --> 0:29:45.240
<v Speaker 1>that must feel like to have all this scrutiny and

0:29:45.280 --> 0:29:48.640
<v Speaker 1>all these questions all the time about what was happening

0:29:48.640 --> 0:29:49.160
<v Speaker 1>with her mother.

0:29:49.880 --> 0:29:50.480
<v Speaker 3>She knew.

0:29:50.640 --> 0:29:53.600
<v Speaker 1>Not that that means no less, it's more so in

0:29:53.640 --> 0:29:57.320
<v Speaker 1>many ways. But she knew from the first week what

0:29:57.360 --> 0:29:58.120
<v Speaker 1>had happened.

0:29:57.800 --> 0:29:59.560
<v Speaker 3>To her first week, what had happened.

0:29:59.680 --> 0:30:03.800
<v Speaker 1>That's so sad, and so it's so illustrative in a

0:30:03.840 --> 0:30:08.040
<v Speaker 1>way about we have obsession with true crime stories, as

0:30:08.080 --> 0:30:10.920
<v Speaker 1>if we're all amateur salutes, but we don't know what's

0:30:10.920 --> 0:30:11.320
<v Speaker 1>going on.

0:30:11.440 --> 0:30:14.600
<v Speaker 3>No. Well, and unfortunately in this case, it seems very

0:30:14.600 --> 0:30:17.600
<v Speaker 3>clear that the authorities don't know what's going on, because

0:30:17.600 --> 0:30:20.160
<v Speaker 3>that's why they've released both these notes so many months

0:30:20.200 --> 0:30:23.120
<v Speaker 3>after it happened. They've said they hope that people might

0:30:23.160 --> 0:30:26.040
<v Speaker 3>be able to pick up on the wording or maybe

0:30:26.080 --> 0:30:29.440
<v Speaker 3>connect if someone in their life has seemed attached or

0:30:31.000 --> 0:30:33.800
<v Speaker 3>or has seemed weird lately, that they're hoping that that

0:30:33.880 --> 0:30:37.480
<v Speaker 3>may lead to a fresh round of leads, because they're

0:30:37.520 --> 0:30:38.120
<v Speaker 3>out of them.

0:30:38.040 --> 0:30:40.880
<v Speaker 1>Because there have been no leads none. Oh, it's such

0:30:40.960 --> 0:30:45.720
<v Speaker 1>a sad story. After the break, there is a tradwife,

0:30:45.840 --> 0:30:48.600
<v Speaker 1>one of the most famous of them all, who wants

0:30:48.680 --> 0:30:52.560
<v Speaker 1>us to know that we got it all wrong. Nara

0:30:52.640 --> 0:30:56.000
<v Speaker 1>Smith wants a word friends, she wants a word with us.

0:30:56.440 --> 0:30:59.160
<v Speaker 1>If you are not familiar with Nara Smith. We have

0:30:59.200 --> 0:31:00.880
<v Speaker 1>talked about our a few times on the show, but

0:31:01.000 --> 0:31:04.000
<v Speaker 1>let me play you a little grab of her signature

0:31:04.080 --> 0:31:05.200
<v Speaker 1>style of content.

0:31:06.120 --> 0:31:09.800
<v Speaker 6>My husband's been craving the most random things lately, but

0:31:09.880 --> 0:31:12.320
<v Speaker 6>today it was extra weird. When he asked me whether

0:31:12.360 --> 0:31:15.240
<v Speaker 6>we had top ramen at home, told him, before you

0:31:15.320 --> 0:31:17.080
<v Speaker 6>go out and grab it, let me just make it

0:31:17.120 --> 0:31:17.400
<v Speaker 6>for you.

0:31:18.000 --> 0:31:22.320
<v Speaker 1>Now. I just kind of adore her, So picture the

0:31:22.320 --> 0:31:25.880
<v Speaker 1>fact that what happens then is Nara Smith makes Ramen

0:31:25.960 --> 0:31:28.840
<v Speaker 1>noodles from scratch, which have to be rested for five hours,

0:31:28.840 --> 0:31:31.960
<v Speaker 1>so it's not like he wanted it now and he

0:31:31.960 --> 0:31:34.560
<v Speaker 1>can have it now. And she is wearing while she

0:31:34.640 --> 0:31:38.800
<v Speaker 1>does that, a black evening gown, and I had to

0:31:38.840 --> 0:31:44.600
<v Speaker 1>ask fashion expert Amelia Lester what this was? A chain? Yes,

0:31:45.320 --> 0:31:49.000
<v Speaker 1>a chain, metal and pearl hood, like a sort of

0:31:49.000 --> 0:31:52.800
<v Speaker 1>shruggy hood, a full face of makeup, and an inscrutable expression.

0:31:53.200 --> 0:31:56.280
<v Speaker 1>Nara makes these kind of videos where she cooks something

0:31:56.680 --> 0:31:59.600
<v Speaker 1>almost ridiculous from scratch, not that making rama from scratch

0:31:59.600 --> 0:32:03.400
<v Speaker 1>is ridiculed, but she makes chewing gum, she makes cheerios,

0:32:03.920 --> 0:32:09.120
<v Speaker 1>aureos toothpaste from scratch while wearing full evening whear to

0:32:09.280 --> 0:32:13.160
<v Speaker 1>her twelve plus million TikTok followers and her five million

0:32:13.160 --> 0:32:17.800
<v Speaker 1>Instagram followers. She is a big deal. Now. You would

0:32:17.800 --> 0:32:20.360
<v Speaker 1>have also heard us talking about her because she also

0:32:20.400 --> 0:32:25.080
<v Speaker 1>has been going through something unbelievably difficult lately. She uncharacteristically

0:32:25.120 --> 0:32:28.320
<v Speaker 1>really sort of posed as herself and told her followers

0:32:28.320 --> 0:32:31.040
<v Speaker 1>that for the past year, her little daughter, Whimsey, who

0:32:31.080 --> 0:32:33.040
<v Speaker 1>is the second youngest of her four kids, has been

0:32:33.040 --> 0:32:36.000
<v Speaker 1>in cancer treatment and she's now in remission, which is

0:32:36.000 --> 0:32:39.000
<v Speaker 1>why Nara shared the details and why she is now

0:32:39.040 --> 0:32:41.600
<v Speaker 1>out on the promotional trail because she's got a cookbook

0:32:41.680 --> 0:32:45.200
<v Speaker 1>coming out right, and she's done what widely believed to

0:32:45.240 --> 0:32:48.120
<v Speaker 1>be her first long form interview with Alex Cooper on

0:32:48.160 --> 0:32:51.760
<v Speaker 1>Call Her Daddy. She talks about how the thing that

0:32:51.840 --> 0:32:54.640
<v Speaker 1>drives her crazy is that everybody thinks because she makes

0:32:54.640 --> 0:32:56.360
<v Speaker 1>her food from scratch, and that's a thing that she

0:32:56.560 --> 0:32:59.920
<v Speaker 1>is a trad wife. Along with Ballerina Farm, she's hell

0:33:00.160 --> 0:33:02.240
<v Speaker 1>up as a poster child for that movement, and she

0:33:02.320 --> 0:33:07.080
<v Speaker 1>says she has no idea why here she is speaking

0:33:07.120 --> 0:33:09.400
<v Speaker 1>in her real voice about it. I just want to

0:33:09.440 --> 0:33:12.360
<v Speaker 1>there's a reference in here to her autoimmune issues. She

0:33:12.440 --> 0:33:16.920
<v Speaker 1>tells Alex that she started cooking things from scratch and

0:33:16.960 --> 0:33:19.960
<v Speaker 1>eating nonprocessed food as a result. After her first baby

0:33:20.000 --> 0:33:22.520
<v Speaker 1>was born when she was just When Nara was just nineteen,

0:33:22.840 --> 0:33:26.680
<v Speaker 1>she started having lots of autoimmune related flare ups like

0:33:26.880 --> 0:33:30.560
<v Speaker 1>XMA and different issues. Here she is speaking to Alex

0:33:30.600 --> 0:33:33.840
<v Speaker 1>in her real voice about why she is not a tradwife.

0:33:34.000 --> 0:33:36.720
<v Speaker 5>A trad wife is a woman who embraces or promotes

0:33:36.720 --> 0:33:39.360
<v Speaker 5>a traditional model of marriage and family life, where she

0:33:39.400 --> 0:33:43.880
<v Speaker 5>typically prioritizes being a homemaker and a primary caregiver for kids,

0:33:44.320 --> 0:33:48.080
<v Speaker 5>takes primary responsibility for cooking, cleaning, and managing the household,

0:33:48.400 --> 0:33:52.520
<v Speaker 5>supports her husband's role as the primary breadwinner, often values

0:33:52.600 --> 0:33:57.640
<v Speaker 5>traditional gender roles within marriage. So with that definition in

0:33:57.680 --> 0:34:00.880
<v Speaker 5>those points and none of that, and we can go

0:34:00.960 --> 0:34:03.880
<v Speaker 5>through it point by point. I don't prioritize being a homemaker.

0:34:04.280 --> 0:34:07.440
<v Speaker 5>I'm a working mom, Like sure do. I love cooking

0:34:07.480 --> 0:34:09.839
<v Speaker 5>because it's my passion and because I kind of have

0:34:09.920 --> 0:34:13.640
<v Speaker 5>to do it given my autoimmune absolutely primary caregiver for

0:34:13.719 --> 0:34:15.960
<v Speaker 5>my kids. Now, my husband and I split it fifty

0:34:15.960 --> 0:34:18.279
<v Speaker 5>to fifty, like when he works, I watch them, When

0:34:18.840 --> 0:34:21.680
<v Speaker 5>I work, he watches them. And now, given everything that's

0:34:21.680 --> 0:34:24.000
<v Speaker 5>been going on, we also have helped my moms out.

0:34:24.280 --> 0:34:26.120
<v Speaker 5>We have someone that helps us with the kids because

0:34:26.160 --> 0:34:28.200
<v Speaker 5>it's just not doable for me to do it all.

0:34:28.960 --> 0:34:31.279
<v Speaker 1>She says. If you turn the camera around from one

0:34:31.280 --> 0:34:35.160
<v Speaker 1>of her videos of her wearing her chain mailhood, you

0:34:35.200 --> 0:34:39.480
<v Speaker 1>would see a chaotic scene of four kids, her husband

0:34:39.520 --> 0:34:42.160
<v Speaker 1>being there, a messy house, all the usual things, and

0:34:42.200 --> 0:34:45.680
<v Speaker 1>that she's actually always working. Do we feel like Nara

0:34:45.719 --> 0:34:46.839
<v Speaker 1>Smith has been done wrong?

0:34:48.440 --> 0:34:51.120
<v Speaker 2>Firstly, I love how she memorized the definition of tradworth.

0:34:51.160 --> 0:34:54.200
<v Speaker 1>Oh she was reading it, Oh, Alex Cooper was saying,

0:34:54.239 --> 0:34:56.600
<v Speaker 1>and she was like, so, Nara said, I had to

0:34:56.600 --> 0:34:58.360
<v Speaker 1>look up what a trad wife was and this is

0:34:58.360 --> 0:34:58.759
<v Speaker 1>what it.

0:34:58.680 --> 0:35:01.080
<v Speaker 2>Is, right, Because I was She's probably gets asked this

0:35:01.160 --> 0:35:04.719
<v Speaker 2>question all the time. I do kind of feel bad that, like,

0:35:05.120 --> 0:35:07.120
<v Speaker 2>not because we've kind of like lumped it in with

0:35:07.160 --> 0:35:10.120
<v Speaker 2>the tradewife, but because she is so upset by it,

0:35:10.160 --> 0:35:12.520
<v Speaker 2>Like she definitely doesn't want to be a trad wife.

0:35:12.800 --> 0:35:16.320
<v Speaker 2>And I do think that she did become a casualty

0:35:16.320 --> 0:35:19.480
<v Speaker 2>in the tradwife movement because she became famous around the

0:35:19.560 --> 0:35:22.480
<v Speaker 2>same time as like Ballerina Farm.

0:35:22.280 --> 0:35:22.880
<v Speaker 1>And all of that.

0:35:23.280 --> 0:35:25.680
<v Speaker 2>And I think the reason why is because her videos

0:35:25.680 --> 0:35:29.319
<v Speaker 2>are just very similar to the content we were seeing then. Yes,

0:35:29.360 --> 0:35:32.400
<v Speaker 2>they are like similar to Ballerina Farm. It's like a

0:35:32.440 --> 0:35:36.080
<v Speaker 2>woman at her kitchen cooking something from scratch. She's got

0:35:36.120 --> 0:35:38.759
<v Speaker 2>like a million kids. She always looks good, always looks

0:35:38.760 --> 0:35:41.200
<v Speaker 2>put together, and we were just so I think it

0:35:41.239 --> 0:35:44.719
<v Speaker 2>was around the time where we were seeing influences turn

0:35:44.760 --> 0:35:47.600
<v Speaker 2>into brands and we became obsessed with wanting to put

0:35:47.800 --> 0:35:49.440
<v Speaker 2>terms on these things. So we came up with a

0:35:49.560 --> 0:35:51.960
<v Speaker 2>term trad wife, and we were like, Ballerina Farm, yup,

0:35:52.000 --> 0:35:53.400
<v Speaker 2>you go in there, you go in there, you do

0:35:53.440 --> 0:35:55.200
<v Speaker 2>cooking videos, you go in there, Nara Smith, you go

0:35:55.239 --> 0:35:57.239
<v Speaker 2>in there. And now we're like, we have this big

0:35:57.320 --> 0:35:59.440
<v Speaker 2>term for all of them that we can just group

0:35:59.480 --> 0:36:02.560
<v Speaker 2>them together and then just use them as a group

0:36:02.680 --> 0:36:04.799
<v Speaker 2>to say whether they're good or bad, or they do

0:36:04.880 --> 0:36:07.439
<v Speaker 2>this or don't do this. And she's just fallen into

0:36:07.440 --> 0:36:09.279
<v Speaker 2>that group. And she was like, no, get me out

0:36:09.320 --> 0:36:11.560
<v Speaker 2>of the group. You see me as I can own

0:36:11.600 --> 0:36:12.400
<v Speaker 2>my own person.

0:36:12.680 --> 0:36:14.640
<v Speaker 3>But being in the group has made her a lot

0:36:14.680 --> 0:36:17.800
<v Speaker 3>of money. Like that's the thing. I think She's flirting

0:36:17.840 --> 0:36:21.440
<v Speaker 3>with the appearance of a trad wife, but now wanting

0:36:21.480 --> 0:36:23.600
<v Speaker 3>to distance herself from it, and I think that's a

0:36:23.680 --> 0:36:25.919
<v Speaker 3>little bit like wanting your cake and eating it too.

0:36:26.280 --> 0:36:29.279
<v Speaker 1>I think I've always argued that Nara Smith is not

0:36:29.320 --> 0:36:32.120
<v Speaker 1>a trad wife because if you watch her content is

0:36:32.200 --> 0:36:36.640
<v Speaker 1>so obviously satirical, Like it is so obviously there to

0:36:36.719 --> 0:36:40.439
<v Speaker 1>be humorous and weird. Like, really, no one is suggesting

0:36:40.760 --> 0:36:44.040
<v Speaker 1>that you really make chewing gum from scratch while wearing

0:36:44.080 --> 0:36:47.200
<v Speaker 1>cature like she is. It's entertainment, But.

0:36:47.600 --> 0:36:49.839
<v Speaker 3>You mean you're putting her in the same categories as

0:36:49.840 --> 0:36:52.000
<v Speaker 3>Celeste Barber In other words.

0:36:51.800 --> 0:36:53.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I don't want to Satirical might not be

0:36:53.719 --> 0:36:56.759
<v Speaker 1>the right word in that it's played for humor, but

0:36:56.920 --> 0:37:00.440
<v Speaker 1>it's entertainment. This is my thing about trad wives being

0:37:00.520 --> 0:37:03.040
<v Speaker 1>the term that's thrown around for any woman who cooks dinner. Right,

0:37:03.560 --> 0:37:08.120
<v Speaker 1>there are actual, real tradwives, and they're defining characteristic. Really

0:37:08.200 --> 0:37:11.040
<v Speaker 1>is that they are. They are telling you how to live.

0:37:11.480 --> 0:37:14.160
<v Speaker 1>They will, they have an agenda, and they're feeding it

0:37:14.200 --> 0:37:16.400
<v Speaker 1>to you. They are telling you that women have been

0:37:16.440 --> 0:37:19.600
<v Speaker 1>sold a lie by feminism, that traditional family roles are

0:37:19.640 --> 0:37:22.520
<v Speaker 1>the secret to your happiness, that terrible mothers leave their

0:37:22.600 --> 0:37:25.080
<v Speaker 1>children in daycare. They exist. We've got plenty of them

0:37:25.120 --> 0:37:27.120
<v Speaker 1>here in Australia. I see their content all the time.

0:37:27.480 --> 0:37:30.160
<v Speaker 1>Not every woman who cooks dinner on the internet is

0:37:30.200 --> 0:37:33.560
<v Speaker 1>that person what a Nara Smith has done. She's a model.

0:37:33.880 --> 0:37:39.360
<v Speaker 1>She's maybe very deliberately, maybe or most accidentally, stumbled across

0:37:39.440 --> 0:37:42.920
<v Speaker 1>a winning formula and she created a persona around it,

0:37:42.960 --> 0:37:47.960
<v Speaker 1>which is this soft speaking woman who's making aureos from

0:37:48.000 --> 0:37:50.840
<v Speaker 1>scratch and chewing come from scratch and Nando's from scratch.

0:37:51.360 --> 0:37:54.279
<v Speaker 1>But she's not telling you she's not got a like

0:37:54.360 --> 0:37:57.400
<v Speaker 1>a political or no, she doesn't have a political agenda.

0:37:57.800 --> 0:38:01.160
<v Speaker 1>This is just entertainment. And I think think that what

0:38:01.400 --> 0:38:04.239
<v Speaker 1>happens is well two things. I think I think one

0:38:04.280 --> 0:38:06.920
<v Speaker 1>of them is as women, and we've talked about this

0:38:06.960 --> 0:38:10.719
<v Speaker 1>many times, even to almost two decades into social media,

0:38:10.800 --> 0:38:13.280
<v Speaker 1>we are almost incapable of watching a woman do anything

0:38:13.320 --> 0:38:16.000
<v Speaker 1>without seeing it as some kind of judgment or instruction.

0:38:16.680 --> 0:38:21.239
<v Speaker 1>So we're so primed to feel judged and guilty and

0:38:21.600 --> 0:38:26.760
<v Speaker 1>insecure that we're like, well, Narasmith makes her own chewing

0:38:26.800 --> 0:38:31.279
<v Speaker 1>gum while wearing Chaparelli, Like, clearly I'm doing life wrong

0:38:31.400 --> 0:38:34.879
<v Speaker 1>when that's not what Narasmith is doing. But the other

0:38:34.920 --> 0:38:38.760
<v Speaker 1>interesting point to this to me is she became massive

0:38:38.880 --> 0:38:41.359
<v Speaker 1>very quickly, so a huge bread We're making all kinds

0:38:41.400 --> 0:38:44.080
<v Speaker 1>of brand deals. She does lots of sponkn Now she's

0:38:44.480 --> 0:38:47.000
<v Speaker 1>her cookbook is going to be enormous. You know, it

0:38:47.000 --> 0:38:48.719
<v Speaker 1>would have been a bidding war. It's been years in

0:38:48.760 --> 0:38:51.319
<v Speaker 1>the making. She actually admits that she had never read

0:38:51.320 --> 0:38:54.399
<v Speaker 1>a cookbook before she got the deal to make one,

0:38:54.440 --> 0:38:56.400
<v Speaker 1>and her publisher had to be like, so this is

0:38:56.440 --> 0:38:59.439
<v Speaker 1>how a cookbook works. Let's remember Narrosmith is twenty four

0:38:59.560 --> 0:39:03.600
<v Speaker 1>years right. She goes into this interview with Alex Cooper

0:39:03.640 --> 0:39:06.439
<v Speaker 1>saying that you know, she's been working so hard because

0:39:06.480 --> 0:39:09.080
<v Speaker 1>she has to keep feeding the beast, the social media beast,

0:39:09.160 --> 0:39:11.400
<v Speaker 1>to keep the dollars coming in. She says that her

0:39:11.440 --> 0:39:14.600
<v Speaker 1>and lucky husband's model too, are kind of like joint breadwinners.

0:39:15.239 --> 0:39:18.759
<v Speaker 1>After her last baby, she was incredibly burnt out and

0:39:18.800 --> 0:39:22.759
<v Speaker 1>had a massive crash in an anxiety, terrible postnatal anxiety.

0:39:23.840 --> 0:39:27.000
<v Speaker 1>And so really she's a girl. She's that other archetype

0:39:27.040 --> 0:39:30.160
<v Speaker 1>that we like to grab onto. She's like overworked, burnt

0:39:30.200 --> 0:39:33.760
<v Speaker 1>out girl boss. And yet because she makes her content

0:39:33.880 --> 0:39:37.359
<v Speaker 1>in the home where like, oh no, tradwives are all

0:39:37.400 --> 0:39:40.880
<v Speaker 1>about the soft life and the comfort, and that's not

0:39:41.000 --> 0:39:43.239
<v Speaker 1>been it at all, and I kind of feel that

0:39:43.239 --> 0:39:45.359
<v Speaker 1>that's more on us than it is on her.

0:39:45.480 --> 0:39:48.040
<v Speaker 3>Now, look, you've actually totally won me over to this.

0:39:48.239 --> 0:39:50.320
<v Speaker 3>I had never thought of her as like the Celeste

0:39:50.360 --> 0:39:53.680
<v Speaker 3>Barber of tradwives, but maybe that's exactly what she's doing.

0:39:53.800 --> 0:39:56.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't think she's suggesting anyone actually makes c cerios.

0:39:56.640 --> 0:40:00.160
<v Speaker 3>And I think to sort of prove your point, she

0:40:00.239 --> 0:40:02.560
<v Speaker 3>chooses to go and Call her Daddy. Now, like that's

0:40:02.560 --> 0:40:04.239
<v Speaker 3>one of the biggest podcasts in the world. I think

0:40:04.239 --> 0:40:06.200
<v Speaker 3>anyone with a book to promote wants to go and

0:40:06.239 --> 0:40:09.799
<v Speaker 3>call her Daddy. But there is a huge ecosystem of

0:40:09.960 --> 0:40:12.680
<v Speaker 3>right wing media in the US that she could plug

0:40:12.760 --> 0:40:16.400
<v Speaker 3>into if she did want to push a particular political agenda,

0:40:16.920 --> 0:40:19.399
<v Speaker 3>and she chose to go not on the right wing

0:40:19.520 --> 0:40:23.279
<v Speaker 3>media Ferris Wheel, but instead on Call Her Daddy, which

0:40:23.920 --> 0:40:26.920
<v Speaker 3>does not have the political agenda of tradwives.

0:40:26.680 --> 0:40:29.520
<v Speaker 2>Which is what is kind of confusing to me, because,

0:40:29.880 --> 0:40:33.200
<v Speaker 2>like you said, whole like you see her videos as entertainment,

0:40:33.680 --> 0:40:36.000
<v Speaker 2>but there will be like a majority of her audience

0:40:36.000 --> 0:40:38.040
<v Speaker 2>who thinks she is a trad wife who are following

0:40:38.120 --> 0:40:41.080
<v Speaker 2>her because she embodies what they think the same values

0:40:41.120 --> 0:40:44.440
<v Speaker 2>as themselves. So by doing the opposite and saying I

0:40:44.480 --> 0:40:47.800
<v Speaker 2>am not this, doesn't that just like push her away

0:40:47.880 --> 0:40:50.000
<v Speaker 2>from all of those people who followed her originally.

0:40:50.760 --> 0:40:53.279
<v Speaker 1>I think that the tradwife thing was thrust upon her.

0:40:53.400 --> 0:40:55.839
<v Speaker 1>And to your point, Amelia, has it been helpful? Yes,

0:40:55.920 --> 0:40:58.440
<v Speaker 1>I reckon because it's been one of the biggest trends

0:40:58.480 --> 0:41:00.759
<v Speaker 1>on social media of the past few year even but

0:41:00.840 --> 0:41:03.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people who watch tradwive content, myself included,

0:41:03.840 --> 0:41:07.520
<v Speaker 1>are not necessarily tradwives. I just find it really interesting.

0:41:07.120 --> 0:41:09.960
<v Speaker 3>Well, and the social media platforms know that rage bait

0:41:10.120 --> 0:41:12.320
<v Speaker 3>keeps people engaged like nothing else.

0:41:12.360 --> 0:41:14.600
<v Speaker 1>And so she knows all that. Has she had played

0:41:14.600 --> 0:41:19.800
<v Speaker 1>the attention economy, Yes, but I think that we Ballerina

0:41:19.840 --> 0:41:23.320
<v Speaker 1>farm who's slightly different, but she both of these women

0:41:23.320 --> 0:41:26.759
<v Speaker 1>are now moguls. Basically, they're both run a business. They

0:41:26.760 --> 0:41:28.640
<v Speaker 1>are the main product, and what they make and what

0:41:28.680 --> 0:41:30.240
<v Speaker 1>they put out to the world are the main products.

0:41:30.600 --> 0:41:34.320
<v Speaker 1>But because they're women, and because they're making domestic content,

0:41:34.520 --> 0:41:37.840
<v Speaker 1>as in food, you know that every woman has to

0:41:37.880 --> 0:41:40.120
<v Speaker 1>cook to a point, every parent has to cook to

0:41:40.160 --> 0:41:43.319
<v Speaker 1>a point. All of those things we immediately put them

0:41:43.320 --> 0:41:45.160
<v Speaker 1>in a certain instructive basket.

0:41:45.239 --> 0:41:48.120
<v Speaker 3>But Ballerina Farm is different. I think Ballerina Farm is

0:41:48.200 --> 0:41:50.680
<v Speaker 3>kind of aspirational in a way that I think your

0:41:50.719 --> 0:41:53.200
<v Speaker 3>point here is so true and interesting. I hadn't thought

0:41:53.200 --> 0:41:58.520
<v Speaker 3>about it that she's that Nara is doing satirical content.

0:41:58.600 --> 0:42:02.280
<v Speaker 3>Ballerina Farm is not satyrian. No, there's no like wink

0:42:02.360 --> 0:42:03.600
<v Speaker 3>wink either.

0:42:03.880 --> 0:42:06.600
<v Speaker 1>But look, I think she doesn't like the tradwive term either,

0:42:06.640 --> 0:42:09.640
<v Speaker 1>because the key ingredient to a tradwife really is you're submissive.

0:42:10.320 --> 0:42:13.000
<v Speaker 1>That's the key ingredient is my husband rules the house,

0:42:13.600 --> 0:42:16.160
<v Speaker 1>and there's a whole lot of beliefs and agenda that

0:42:16.200 --> 0:42:20.200
<v Speaker 1>goes with that. And Hannah Nielman also does not agree

0:42:20.200 --> 0:42:24.279
<v Speaker 1>with that statement. Now some people do. Infamously, when a

0:42:24.360 --> 0:42:26.600
<v Speaker 1>journalist went out there to do a profile, she very

0:42:26.680 --> 0:42:29.840
<v Speaker 1>much wrote that in terms of I think he's in charge.

0:42:30.239 --> 0:42:33.839
<v Speaker 1>You know, we've seen that phenomena has become so big.

0:42:33.880 --> 0:42:37.800
<v Speaker 1>There are books about it now, infamous Yesteryear. But whether

0:42:37.920 --> 0:42:40.640
<v Speaker 1>or not they're just actually very savvy business women who've

0:42:40.680 --> 0:42:42.919
<v Speaker 1>chosen this as their arena to play in. I think

0:42:42.920 --> 0:42:47.480
<v Speaker 1>it's really interesting because I think that Anara Smith, who

0:42:47.480 --> 0:42:50.160
<v Speaker 1>as she says, I'm a busy working mom who's actually

0:42:50.320 --> 0:42:54.839
<v Speaker 1>burnt out and needs a break. Is a really interesting

0:42:55.239 --> 0:42:58.239
<v Speaker 1>viewpoint what we think of tradwives as we think, oh,

0:42:58.239 --> 0:43:01.279
<v Speaker 1>they're just frolicking around in the country. She doesn't even

0:43:01.320 --> 0:43:04.120
<v Speaker 1>live in the country, doesn't she. And she travels all

0:43:04.120 --> 0:43:06.759
<v Speaker 1>the time, she's always on a plane, and she's, you know,

0:43:06.840 --> 0:43:09.680
<v Speaker 1>making big deals with every like. She's not that, but

0:43:09.719 --> 0:43:12.720
<v Speaker 1>we've just kind of decided it for her. It's really interesting.

0:43:12.760 --> 0:43:16.280
<v Speaker 1>I think we should all maybe accept particularly on TikTok,

0:43:16.760 --> 0:43:19.280
<v Speaker 1>we're literally just like watching Telly, right, We're just watching

0:43:19.680 --> 0:43:21.799
<v Speaker 1>and this is the Nara Smith Show. And on the

0:43:21.880 --> 0:43:25.920
<v Speaker 1>Nara Smith Show, she wears ridiculous clothes while making ridiculous food,

0:43:26.360 --> 0:43:29.800
<v Speaker 1>and it's funny and entertaining, and there's something very soothing

0:43:29.800 --> 0:43:32.920
<v Speaker 1>about her voice. She's not telling us that we should

0:43:32.920 --> 0:43:35.399
<v Speaker 1>all be making chewing gum, although I do believe there

0:43:35.440 --> 0:43:37.880
<v Speaker 1>is a recipe for chewing gum in the court So delicious.

0:43:39.440 --> 0:43:41.800
<v Speaker 3>So there are two things that people on the internet

0:43:41.840 --> 0:43:43.960
<v Speaker 3>don't like about me. I'll tell you what they are.

0:43:45.360 --> 0:43:46.440
<v Speaker 1>That's not true.

0:43:47.360 --> 0:43:53.960
<v Speaker 3>I'm just sharing facts I agree with them. But these

0:43:53.960 --> 0:43:56.680
<v Speaker 3>are the two things that people have identified as problematic

0:43:56.680 --> 0:43:58.680
<v Speaker 3>about me. The first is my voice, which I can't

0:43:58.719 --> 0:43:59.600
<v Speaker 3>do anything about.

0:44:00.080 --> 0:44:02.600
<v Speaker 1>None of us can. I thought everyone liked your voice.

0:44:03.040 --> 0:44:07.040
<v Speaker 7>I'm just sharing the hot takes about what your voice.

0:44:06.360 --> 0:44:09.879
<v Speaker 7>They say, I'm nasally, They say I am like wet cardboard,

0:44:10.480 --> 0:44:12.919
<v Speaker 7>and also like I've just risen from the grave, which

0:44:12.920 --> 0:44:14.920
<v Speaker 7>given the night's sleep I had last night, is not

0:44:15.000 --> 0:44:16.200
<v Speaker 7>completely untrue.

0:44:16.440 --> 0:44:18.719
<v Speaker 3>So the second thing they say about me, which I

0:44:18.760 --> 0:44:20.880
<v Speaker 3>actually do think is sort of fair, is that I

0:44:21.000 --> 0:44:23.520
<v Speaker 3>don't have any sense of personal style. And this I

0:44:23.560 --> 0:44:26.799
<v Speaker 3>will own because I am very interested in fashion. As

0:44:26.800 --> 0:44:29.680
<v Speaker 3>at Ladders know, I am this show's fashion correspondent, but

0:44:29.719 --> 0:44:31.879
<v Speaker 3>I do it because I'm interested in it. I am

0:44:31.920 --> 0:44:35.880
<v Speaker 3>not pretending that I'm any kind of expert to this point.

0:44:36.280 --> 0:44:39.640
<v Speaker 3>I went to see an expert last week about fashion

0:44:39.880 --> 0:44:42.000
<v Speaker 3>because I don't know anything about it. I needed to

0:44:42.080 --> 0:44:45.160
<v Speaker 3>learn some more, so I went to see a color expert.

0:44:45.680 --> 0:44:47.520
<v Speaker 3>Then I'll go and see a voice coach after that.

0:44:47.560 --> 0:44:49.680
<v Speaker 1>I think, I think you're the only one who does

0:44:49.719 --> 0:44:50.760
<v Speaker 1>homework for show.

0:44:51.760 --> 0:44:52.680
<v Speaker 3>You saw the Odyssey.

0:44:52.840 --> 0:44:55.280
<v Speaker 1>I watch a lot of Nara Smith videos.

0:44:54.840 --> 0:44:56.759
<v Speaker 3>And you also asked what the difference was between a

0:44:56.800 --> 0:44:59.560
<v Speaker 3>sale and anncas So whatice that? So there are two

0:44:59.600 --> 0:45:02.319
<v Speaker 3>things I from the color expert that I wanted to

0:45:02.600 --> 0:45:06.880
<v Speaker 3>share today. The first is sixty thirty ten. This is

0:45:06.960 --> 0:45:10.040
<v Speaker 3>a rule of how you put color together. Because we're

0:45:10.040 --> 0:45:13.280
<v Speaker 3>not doing the like various shades of Latain cappuccino anymore.

0:45:13.320 --> 0:45:16.080
<v Speaker 3>You know the neutrals, the Cutaushian neutrals that dominated for

0:45:16.120 --> 0:45:19.520
<v Speaker 3>so long we're doing color. There's enough depressing stuff happening

0:45:19.560 --> 0:45:21.480
<v Speaker 3>in the world. We have to uplift he very bad

0:45:21.520 --> 0:45:24.680
<v Speaker 3>in beige, very bad. Most people do. This color expert

0:45:24.760 --> 0:45:26.440
<v Speaker 3>was like, put on a bright color that is right

0:45:26.520 --> 0:45:28.360
<v Speaker 3>for you, and you can wear less makeup and you

0:45:28.520 --> 0:45:30.680
<v Speaker 3>just look happier and more cheery and like you had

0:45:30.680 --> 0:45:31.040
<v Speaker 3>a good night.

0:45:31.320 --> 0:45:32.120
<v Speaker 1>If it's this on the.

0:45:32.160 --> 0:45:32.680
<v Speaker 3>Right for you.

0:45:32.760 --> 0:45:35.239
<v Speaker 2>Because I find color is sometimes a bit intimidated, it's

0:45:35.360 --> 0:45:36.239
<v Speaker 2>very intimidating.

0:45:36.640 --> 0:45:39.080
<v Speaker 3>But this is a rule about how you put color together.

0:45:39.239 --> 0:45:42.680
<v Speaker 3>Sixty thirty ten. So sixty percent of your outfit should

0:45:42.719 --> 0:45:45.759
<v Speaker 3>be one color, thirty percent should be another color, and

0:45:45.840 --> 0:45:48.600
<v Speaker 3>ten percent should be another color. So three colors. She

0:45:48.680 --> 0:45:50.960
<v Speaker 3>did say that as you get more advanced in fashion,

0:45:51.280 --> 0:45:53.520
<v Speaker 3>you can do five colors, and then you can do

0:45:53.640 --> 0:45:54.400
<v Speaker 3>nine colors.

0:45:54.480 --> 0:45:58.719
<v Speaker 1>But that's like, that's me. I'd colors like fifteen colors

0:45:58.800 --> 0:46:01.319
<v Speaker 1>up to that level, but for us, it's three. Got it.

0:46:01.400 --> 0:46:03.960
<v Speaker 3>And what I found really revolutionary about that is that

0:46:04.080 --> 0:46:06.000
<v Speaker 3>I think I sort of assumed that it was more

0:46:06.040 --> 0:46:08.640
<v Speaker 3>fifty to fifty, Like I'll aim for two colors, and

0:46:08.680 --> 0:46:12.000
<v Speaker 3>I'll make one my top and one my pants. But no,

0:46:12.280 --> 0:46:16.160
<v Speaker 3>sixty thirty ten, So tell me what that would mean.

0:46:16.200 --> 0:46:18.680
<v Speaker 1>So that would mean my pants are one color and

0:46:18.719 --> 0:46:20.600
<v Speaker 1>my shirt is another color.

0:46:22.320 --> 0:46:25.000
<v Speaker 3>I'll tell you what it means. So I went home

0:46:25.080 --> 0:46:27.239
<v Speaker 3>and I tried to put an outfit together based on

0:46:27.360 --> 0:46:30.800
<v Speaker 3>sixty thirty ten. I'm wearing a pair of really bright

0:46:30.880 --> 0:46:33.200
<v Speaker 3>red pants that I've struggled to know what to pair

0:46:33.239 --> 0:46:36.080
<v Speaker 3>them with, And so I put the bright red pants

0:46:36.600 --> 0:46:40.040
<v Speaker 3>with a pink jumper and then with a coat that

0:46:40.200 --> 0:46:43.160
<v Speaker 3>was a checked pattern that had red in It had

0:46:43.200 --> 0:46:46.120
<v Speaker 3>a bit of a blighting outfit, and it totally worked,

0:46:46.120 --> 0:46:47.680
<v Speaker 3>even though it shouldn't have. And I would never have

0:46:47.719 --> 0:46:49.840
<v Speaker 3>thought about it beforehand. Because that brings me to the

0:46:49.880 --> 0:46:52.280
<v Speaker 3>second point she made. It's about how to wear prints.

0:46:52.760 --> 0:46:54.960
<v Speaker 3>When you wear a print, look for the color that

0:46:55.080 --> 0:46:57.920
<v Speaker 3>is the least obvious color in the print. And then

0:46:58.000 --> 0:47:01.200
<v Speaker 3>that's your ten. Bring out that as your ten. So,

0:47:01.280 --> 0:47:03.600
<v Speaker 3>for instance, Holly is wearing a lovely shirt today that's

0:47:03.640 --> 0:47:07.000
<v Speaker 3>got a floral design and the main colors are pink

0:47:07.320 --> 0:47:10.200
<v Speaker 3>and cream, and it's a gray shirt, but there's a

0:47:10.239 --> 0:47:12.799
<v Speaker 3>tiny little bit of mustard in there, and she would say,

0:47:12.920 --> 0:47:14.280
<v Speaker 3>bring out the mustard.

0:47:14.600 --> 0:47:15.680
<v Speaker 2>Wow.

0:47:16.360 --> 0:47:19.800
<v Speaker 1>This sounds tricky but important because it is interesting. Amelia

0:47:19.840 --> 0:47:23.560
<v Speaker 1>walked into the meeting today and we all just exclaimed

0:47:24.320 --> 0:47:28.400
<v Speaker 1>about outfit. And you know, this is a supportive workplace.

0:47:28.440 --> 0:47:30.560
<v Speaker 1>We often tell each other that we look nice. But

0:47:30.600 --> 0:47:35.359
<v Speaker 1>there was a universal cry of approval. And that's because this.

0:47:35.360 --> 0:47:39.200
<v Speaker 3>People cry so beautiful.

0:47:40.520 --> 0:47:40.879
<v Speaker 1>To do.

0:47:41.960 --> 0:47:43.759
<v Speaker 3>And I said, this is just Monday for me.

0:47:44.560 --> 0:47:45.799
<v Speaker 1>It's math, That's what it is.

0:47:45.800 --> 0:47:50.200
<v Speaker 3>It's just math sixty thirty ten, forget fifty to fifty.

0:47:50.400 --> 0:47:53.640
<v Speaker 1>All right, we need some examples of this. That's so

0:47:53.760 --> 0:47:55.880
<v Speaker 1>good because the last time we did colour rules, Amelia,

0:47:55.920 --> 0:47:57.839
<v Speaker 1>was when we all got our colors done. And I

0:47:57.880 --> 0:48:00.759
<v Speaker 1>can't I can't make my head work with it. I

0:48:00.760 --> 0:48:02.759
<v Speaker 1>think I've got some weird color thing going on, because

0:48:03.080 --> 0:48:05.080
<v Speaker 1>you do, I don't understand me. I was trying to

0:48:05.120 --> 0:48:07.040
<v Speaker 1>explain to me the difference between a warm tone and

0:48:07.040 --> 0:48:09.359
<v Speaker 1>a cool about your veins. I don't understand that.

0:48:09.440 --> 0:48:11.680
<v Speaker 2>It's like the undertone of the color that you're looking

0:48:11.719 --> 0:48:14.840
<v Speaker 2>at warm cool that I would say was cool.

0:48:14.920 --> 0:48:18.120
<v Speaker 1>Okay, I don't know. I don't understand anyway. But also

0:48:18.360 --> 0:48:21.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm a spring, but I don't like pink, so I'm

0:48:22.120 --> 0:48:26.920
<v Speaker 1>right anyway, So this is very healthy color problems of

0:48:26.960 --> 0:48:27.960
<v Speaker 1>this whole podcast.

0:48:27.960 --> 0:48:30.600
<v Speaker 3>Some how very you that someone sits like type past

0:48:30.640 --> 0:48:32.800
<v Speaker 3>your color is spring, and you're like, I'm a sale.

0:48:32.880 --> 0:48:33.800
<v Speaker 3>I'm not accepting it.

0:48:34.400 --> 0:48:38.520
<v Speaker 1>True, I don't like I don't like rules. I'm not

0:48:38.600 --> 0:48:41.080
<v Speaker 1>having that anyway. Out Louders tell us, we'd love to

0:48:41.120 --> 0:48:45.120
<v Speaker 1>know how you're got to apply it's sixty years please.

0:48:45.920 --> 0:48:48.080
<v Speaker 3>It's actually really fun because then you get to make

0:48:48.120 --> 0:48:50.400
<v Speaker 3>all new outfits that you would never have left.

0:48:50.440 --> 0:48:52.240
<v Speaker 1>Let's have a bit of color therapy in the group.

0:48:52.280 --> 0:48:54.200
<v Speaker 1>That would be great anyway. That is all we have

0:48:54.239 --> 0:48:56.480
<v Speaker 1>time for this Monday. Out Louders, thank you for being

0:48:56.480 --> 0:48:58.279
<v Speaker 1>here with us. As always, we'll be back in your

0:48:58.320 --> 0:49:03.440
<v Speaker 1>ears tomorrow. Bye. Mamma Mere acknowledges the traditional owners of

0:49:03.480 --> 0:49:05.719
<v Speaker 1>the land on which we have recorded this podcast.