WEBVTT - Kate Middleton's Face & Martha Stewart's Fortune

0:00:10.327 --> 0:00:14.807
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to a MoMA Mia podcast. Mama Mayer acknowledges

0:00:14.847 --> 0:00:17.607
<v Speaker 1>the traditional owners of land and waters that this podcast

0:00:17.647 --> 0:00:20.407
<v Speaker 1>is recorded on. Welcome to Mama Mea are out loud?

0:00:20.407 --> 0:00:23.647
<v Speaker 1>What women are actually talking about on Wednesday the thirty.

0:00:23.927 --> 0:00:25.287
<v Speaker 2>On What how About?

0:00:25.327 --> 0:00:31.927
<v Speaker 1>We's done Again? Hello, and welcome to Mama Mea Out

0:00:31.927 --> 0:00:34.927
<v Speaker 1>loud What women are actually talking about on Wednesday, the

0:00:35.007 --> 0:00:37.887
<v Speaker 1>thirteenth of November. I'm Meya Friedman sitting in the big

0:00:37.967 --> 0:00:39.687
<v Speaker 1>chair while Holly wayIn Wright is away.

0:00:40.007 --> 0:00:43.287
<v Speaker 3>I'm Jesse Stevens and today we are joined by Mama

0:00:43.367 --> 0:00:47.767
<v Speaker 3>Maya's US correspondent and the deputy editor of Foreign Policy magazine,

0:00:47.967 --> 0:00:49.647
<v Speaker 3>our friend, Amelia Lester.

0:00:49.927 --> 0:00:54.247
<v Speaker 1>Hello, Hello, welcome, And on the show today it's equal

0:00:54.287 --> 0:00:57.927
<v Speaker 1>parts chaotic and iconic. Yes, we're talking about the Martha

0:00:57.967 --> 0:01:03.047
<v Speaker 1>Stewart Netflix stocko and why the original influencer Jailbird and

0:01:03.127 --> 0:01:06.927
<v Speaker 1>Snoop's best friend hates it? And why did Kate Middleton's

0:01:06.927 --> 0:01:11.287
<v Speaker 1>face attract so much attention after Remembrance Day's service in London?

0:01:11.687 --> 0:01:15.727
<v Speaker 1>Have we just forgotten what women actually look like? Plus

0:01:15.847 --> 0:01:19.127
<v Speaker 1>dating as a job the new method for single people

0:01:19.207 --> 0:01:23.447
<v Speaker 1>looking to be unsingle that boasts a scorched earth policy

0:01:23.687 --> 0:01:28.487
<v Speaker 1>and some very strict criteria. But first, Jesse Stevens.

0:01:28.167 --> 0:01:31.687
<v Speaker 3>In case he missed it, Armie Hammer's mum has spoken

0:01:31.687 --> 0:01:34.807
<v Speaker 3>about a very special birthday present she gifted her son,

0:01:34.967 --> 0:01:38.607
<v Speaker 3>who is definitely not a literal cannibal. In case you're wondering,

0:01:39.087 --> 0:01:43.007
<v Speaker 3>Hamma has a new podcast is called Army hammer Time Podcast,

0:01:43.487 --> 0:01:46.327
<v Speaker 3>and he dropped the second of a two part interview

0:01:46.767 --> 0:01:50.047
<v Speaker 3>with his mother Drew. Here's what she said.

0:01:50.407 --> 0:01:50.927
<v Speaker 4>What did you get?

0:01:51.007 --> 0:01:53.607
<v Speaker 5>So I call Army and I go, Army, what would

0:01:53.607 --> 0:01:55.167
<v Speaker 5>you like for your birthday this year?

0:01:55.527 --> 0:01:57.487
<v Speaker 6>And he goes, oh, I don't know, you know, maybe

0:01:57.527 --> 0:02:01.047
<v Speaker 6>maybe money whatever. And I was like, I believe I'm

0:02:01.047 --> 0:02:02.527
<v Speaker 6>going to give you a vas sect to me.

0:02:05.247 --> 0:02:07.287
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so yeah, my mom got me a sex to.

0:02:07.287 --> 0:02:10.807
<v Speaker 6>Me for that stupid and by the way, you know,

0:02:11.127 --> 0:02:14.087
<v Speaker 6>as the church lady, I would love to say, okay, Army,

0:02:14.127 --> 0:02:16.407
<v Speaker 6>I'm really praying that you don't have sex outside of

0:02:16.487 --> 0:02:19.247
<v Speaker 6>marriage because under God, sex you know, is in the

0:02:19.247 --> 0:02:20.487
<v Speaker 6>purity of a marriage and.

0:02:20.447 --> 0:02:24.487
<v Speaker 5>All this, and I'm thinking that's not gonna work. So

0:02:24.527 --> 0:02:28.447
<v Speaker 5>now I'm out here blasting away, bro, just throwing it

0:02:28.487 --> 0:02:29.327
<v Speaker 5>all over the place.

0:02:31.727 --> 0:02:35.367
<v Speaker 3>She also went on to say how many young women

0:02:35.487 --> 0:02:38.727
<v Speaker 3>would love to have Armie Hammer's little babies.

0:02:38.847 --> 0:02:41.127
<v Speaker 1>I love this interview. It's made my whole week and

0:02:41.247 --> 0:02:44.207
<v Speaker 1>you can watch the video of it. It's quite extraordinary.

0:02:44.247 --> 0:02:46.607
<v Speaker 1>It's just the two of them. I think Army's wearing

0:02:46.647 --> 0:02:48.647
<v Speaker 1>like shorts and thongs and sitting in a chair and

0:02:48.687 --> 0:02:50.847
<v Speaker 1>his mum's just sitting on the couch and they just

0:02:50.887 --> 0:02:54.007
<v Speaker 1>set up I think a phone. But she goes on

0:02:54.047 --> 0:02:56.647
<v Speaker 1>to say it's a miracle after he talks about blasting

0:02:56.647 --> 0:02:58.847
<v Speaker 1>it everywhere. It's a miracle we don't have a bunch

0:02:58.847 --> 0:03:02.047
<v Speaker 1>of little hammers running around and he said, yeah, I

0:03:02.247 --> 0:03:02.727
<v Speaker 1>ate them.

0:03:03.767 --> 0:03:08.927
<v Speaker 3>Wow, that is fucked and a less blasting, Army, less blasting.

0:03:09.727 --> 0:03:13.527
<v Speaker 3>She also had some thoughts about those allegations that were

0:03:13.567 --> 0:03:16.247
<v Speaker 3>made in twenty twenty one. Here is how she directly

0:03:16.287 --> 0:03:17.007
<v Speaker 3>referenced them.

0:03:17.167 --> 0:03:18.247
<v Speaker 1>Well, you know, I even.

0:03:18.087 --> 0:03:20.767
<v Speaker 5>Called you one time and I was like, okay, let

0:03:20.807 --> 0:03:24.087
<v Speaker 5>me just get this straight. I go, are there any

0:03:24.167 --> 0:03:28.447
<v Speaker 5>women out there with ribs or limbs missing? That's what

0:03:28.567 --> 0:03:32.567
<v Speaker 5>I want to know as a mother, because end of conversation,

0:03:32.847 --> 0:03:35.287
<v Speaker 5>if there are limbs or ribs missing.

0:03:35.047 --> 0:03:38.007
<v Speaker 1>She's not having any of these accusations. She's not buying

0:03:38.087 --> 0:03:40.887
<v Speaker 1>it her Army would not eat a person.

0:03:41.007 --> 0:03:44.127
<v Speaker 2>I do want to say, I'm all for normalizing vasectoms

0:03:44.207 --> 0:03:46.167
<v Speaker 2>for men. I think it's really important that men take

0:03:46.207 --> 0:03:50.367
<v Speaker 2>responsibility for family planning. And my husband, for the record,

0:03:50.447 --> 0:03:55.007
<v Speaker 2>did instagram his vasectomy live, not live, but before and

0:03:55.047 --> 0:03:55.607
<v Speaker 2>after shock.

0:03:55.687 --> 0:03:58.047
<v Speaker 1>Can you explain? Is it true? I heard that there's

0:03:58.047 --> 0:04:01.127
<v Speaker 1>a big thing on Super Bowl someday in the US

0:04:01.287 --> 0:04:04.807
<v Speaker 1>where men go and get their vasectoms and then recover

0:04:04.887 --> 0:04:06.927
<v Speaker 1>on the couch watching like the day before, and then

0:04:06.967 --> 0:04:08.407
<v Speaker 1>recover on the couch watching football.

0:04:08.527 --> 0:04:10.807
<v Speaker 2>Yees, it's a movie. I have heard that. But it

0:04:10.927 --> 0:04:13.327
<v Speaker 2>is interesting to note that for sectomy rates in the

0:04:13.447 --> 0:04:16.087
<v Speaker 2>US are much lower than they are in Australia. Culturally,

0:04:16.247 --> 0:04:19.047
<v Speaker 2>it's much more taboo, So it's interesting that Army's breaking

0:04:19.087 --> 0:04:20.407
<v Speaker 2>the fourth wall, as it were.

0:04:20.727 --> 0:04:23.407
<v Speaker 1>I'm also interested when she said I gave him a

0:04:23.487 --> 0:04:28.047
<v Speaker 1>vasectomy for his birthday. Look, this story is strange. Army

0:04:28.247 --> 0:04:32.607
<v Speaker 1>is clearly not your usual bear, and I was like,

0:04:32.767 --> 0:04:34.447
<v Speaker 1>did she just get out the scissors?

0:04:34.527 --> 0:04:37.767
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. You love an overshare amongst family members.

0:04:37.407 --> 0:04:40.207
<v Speaker 3>So Jamia, would you pay for your son's v sectomy?

0:04:40.287 --> 0:04:42.967
<v Speaker 1>For example, I'd pay for it to be reversed so

0:04:43.007 --> 0:04:44.407
<v Speaker 1>I could have my grandchildren.

0:04:44.687 --> 0:04:45.167
<v Speaker 3>I get it.

0:04:46.127 --> 0:04:49.647
<v Speaker 1>The documentary about Martha Stewart, who is eighty three, dropped

0:04:49.647 --> 0:04:51.687
<v Speaker 1>on Netflix a couple of weeks ago, and we are

0:04:51.727 --> 0:04:55.527
<v Speaker 1>ready to talk about whether Martha is actually the original influencer.

0:04:56.167 --> 0:04:59.487
<v Speaker 1>A quick snapshot of who Martha is in case you've forgotten.

0:04:59.767 --> 0:05:00.247
<v Speaker 2>She is the.

0:05:00.327 --> 0:05:06.767
<v Speaker 1>Queen of homemaking, cooking, and everything lifestyle. She's a TV personality,

0:05:06.807 --> 0:05:11.327
<v Speaker 1>a business mogul, and the original sort of DIY expert

0:05:11.407 --> 0:05:16.527
<v Speaker 1>who built an entire empire around making everyday life look fabulous.

0:05:16.887 --> 0:05:20.087
<v Speaker 1>She started as a model. She then became an investment

0:05:20.327 --> 0:05:24.287
<v Speaker 1>banker and a stockbroker, and she started her own company.

0:05:24.527 --> 0:05:26.847
<v Speaker 1>After she wrote a cookbook and then made a magazine,

0:05:27.007 --> 0:05:30.407
<v Speaker 1>started a media company called Omnimedia, and it listed on

0:05:30.407 --> 0:05:32.167
<v Speaker 1>the New York Stock Exchange. I think she was on

0:05:32.207 --> 0:05:34.247
<v Speaker 1>the board of the New York Stock Exchange. And she

0:05:34.287 --> 0:05:39.287
<v Speaker 1>became America's first female self made billionaire. So she's got

0:05:39.287 --> 0:05:42.447
<v Speaker 1>an extraordinary legacy, really, most of which I didn't know

0:05:42.487 --> 0:05:45.047
<v Speaker 1>what had forgotten about. So her brand is all about

0:05:45.047 --> 0:05:50.847
<v Speaker 1>like fancy recipes, home dcort tips, gardening ideas, entertainment advice,

0:05:51.367 --> 0:05:57.287
<v Speaker 1>and this documentary covered her whole life because she's got

0:05:57.327 --> 0:06:00.487
<v Speaker 1>a fascinating life. As if that wasn't interesting enough, She

0:06:00.567 --> 0:06:04.247
<v Speaker 1>then went to prison for insider trading, well not quite

0:06:04.247 --> 0:06:08.767
<v Speaker 1>insider trading, but for a scandal around insider trading, and

0:06:09.047 --> 0:06:11.247
<v Speaker 1>she was in prison for about five months. In two

0:06:11.327 --> 0:06:14.927
<v Speaker 1>thousand and four, there was a big, very public celebrity

0:06:15.367 --> 0:06:19.447
<v Speaker 1>court case. Her legacy is that she's basically a household name,

0:06:19.607 --> 0:06:21.727
<v Speaker 1>and if you've ever googled how to set a table,

0:06:21.927 --> 0:06:24.167
<v Speaker 1>I don't know do people google about you would have

0:06:24.207 --> 0:06:28.047
<v Speaker 1>found her. A few key moments from the documentary have

0:06:28.127 --> 0:06:32.287
<v Speaker 1>gone viral, including a chat that she had about infidelity

0:06:32.287 --> 0:06:33.967
<v Speaker 1>in her marriage. So she was married to this guy

0:06:33.967 --> 0:06:35.767
<v Speaker 1>called Andrew Stewart from when she was quite young, I

0:06:35.767 --> 0:06:39.807
<v Speaker 1>think she was nineteen. She kissed someone else on her honeymoon.

0:06:40.207 --> 0:06:43.447
<v Speaker 1>She was in Italy in the Duomo and a moment

0:06:43.487 --> 0:06:45.847
<v Speaker 1>overcame her and she had a quick past with a stranger,

0:06:46.367 --> 0:06:49.647
<v Speaker 1>and then she had another short lived affair. But her

0:06:49.727 --> 0:06:54.247
<v Speaker 1>husband had many affairs before they eventually divorced. Here's the

0:06:54.287 --> 0:06:58.887
<v Speaker 1>conversation she had with the interviewer in the documentary about infidelity.

0:06:59.127 --> 0:07:01.887
<v Speaker 7>I don't know how many different girlfriends he had during

0:07:01.887 --> 0:07:03.967
<v Speaker 7>this time. But I think there were quite a few

0:07:04.447 --> 0:07:07.487
<v Speaker 7>young women. Listen to my advice. If you're married and

0:07:07.567 --> 0:07:09.687
<v Speaker 7>you think you're happily married and your husband started to

0:07:09.767 --> 0:07:12.727
<v Speaker 7>cheat on you, he's a piece of shit, and look

0:07:12.767 --> 0:07:14.247
<v Speaker 7>at him. It's a piece of shit, and get out

0:07:14.247 --> 0:07:17.807
<v Speaker 7>of it, get out of that marriage. But I couldn't

0:07:17.807 --> 0:07:21.407
<v Speaker 7>do that, couldn't walk away. Didn't you have an affair

0:07:21.447 --> 0:07:25.567
<v Speaker 7>early on in the relationship or when you were a Yeah,

0:07:25.607 --> 0:07:27.287
<v Speaker 7>but I don't think Andy ever knew about that.

0:07:27.847 --> 0:07:29.047
<v Speaker 8>He did say anything about it.

0:07:29.167 --> 0:07:31.127
<v Speaker 7>He did, Yes, you would confess to him.

0:07:31.367 --> 0:07:34.887
<v Speaker 2>Sess He didn't straight from the marriage until you told

0:07:34.927 --> 0:07:36.087
<v Speaker 2>him you had already straight.

0:07:36.207 --> 0:07:38.087
<v Speaker 7>Oh that's not true. I don't think.

0:07:38.247 --> 0:07:41.887
<v Speaker 1>Amelia and I've watched this documentary. We adored it. Jesse

0:07:42.007 --> 0:07:46.247
<v Speaker 1>hasn't seen it yet. What was interesting to me was

0:07:46.727 --> 0:07:51.487
<v Speaker 1>realizing that all this talk about Ballerina farm and Nara Smith,

0:07:51.967 --> 0:07:56.447
<v Speaker 1>all these tradwives and influencers who make the work of

0:07:56.807 --> 0:08:02.447
<v Speaker 1>homemaking and parenting look effortless while running these big businesses

0:08:02.527 --> 0:08:05.447
<v Speaker 1>and making a huge amount of money from looking effortless.

0:08:06.327 --> 0:08:09.207
<v Speaker 1>She really was the original influencer. Didn't you think, Amelia

0:08:09.247 --> 0:08:11.287
<v Speaker 1>so What was your takeaways from the documentary.

0:08:11.767 --> 0:08:14.527
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it got me thinking about what an influencer is

0:08:14.567 --> 0:08:17.247
<v Speaker 2>and what makes for an influencer. There was this recent

0:08:17.367 --> 0:08:19.967
<v Speaker 2>survey of the American Labor Force that said seven percent

0:08:20.007 --> 0:08:23.887
<v Speaker 2>of Americans describe themselves as influencers as their job. Now,

0:08:23.887 --> 0:08:27.087
<v Speaker 2>this climate can't be true, the figure cannot be that high.

0:08:27.487 --> 0:08:30.327
<v Speaker 2>But when you think about what makes for an influencer,

0:08:30.527 --> 0:08:33.607
<v Speaker 2>it comes down to a person who can get other

0:08:33.687 --> 0:08:36.687
<v Speaker 2>people to spend money. That's what it comes down to.

0:08:37.367 --> 0:08:39.647
<v Speaker 2>I read a great definition of it recently by Emily

0:08:39.727 --> 0:08:42.487
<v Speaker 2>Sunberg at the newsletter The Feed. She wrote, what the

0:08:42.527 --> 0:08:45.647
<v Speaker 2>followers of these women really want is to step into

0:08:45.687 --> 0:08:49.367
<v Speaker 2>their lives for a few minutes each day. And that

0:08:49.407 --> 0:08:51.927
<v Speaker 2>got me thinking about how you can draw a straight

0:08:52.047 --> 0:08:55.487
<v Speaker 2>line from Martha Stewart to Gwyneth Paltrow, and then I

0:08:55.527 --> 0:08:58.567
<v Speaker 2>would argue a dotted line from both those women to

0:08:58.647 --> 0:08:59.647
<v Speaker 2>Zoe Foster Blake.

0:08:59.967 --> 0:09:05.247
<v Speaker 1>That's interesting. So all women who have built incredible business

0:09:05.247 --> 0:09:09.247
<v Speaker 1>empires and who other women are really obsessed with their lives.

0:09:09.887 --> 0:09:12.007
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, they get us to take out our wallets. They've

0:09:12.047 --> 0:09:15.647
<v Speaker 2>successfully monetized not just their taste, I would say, but

0:09:15.807 --> 0:09:18.727
<v Speaker 2>their lives. We think, for a few minutes each day,

0:09:18.807 --> 0:09:22.607
<v Speaker 2>if we buy a Martha Stuart Kmart piece of home wears,

0:09:22.727 --> 0:09:25.487
<v Speaker 2>or if we buy Gwyneth's new skincare line or Zoe

0:09:25.607 --> 0:09:28.767
<v Speaker 2>foster Blake skincare line, we're actually wanting to grab a

0:09:28.807 --> 0:09:29.927
<v Speaker 2>piece of their lives.

0:09:30.007 --> 0:09:32.087
<v Speaker 1>But isn't that the same with every celebrity who's ever

0:09:32.167 --> 0:09:34.927
<v Speaker 1>endorsed a product, every celebrity who has a fragrance.

0:09:35.247 --> 0:09:37.207
<v Speaker 3>I don't think so. And this is where I actually

0:09:37.247 --> 0:09:40.887
<v Speaker 3>think Martha Stewart is unlike a lot of influencers, and

0:09:40.927 --> 0:09:43.967
<v Speaker 3>that is that she is, as far as I can tell,

0:09:44.487 --> 0:09:49.047
<v Speaker 3>extremely talented. For example, it started with cooking and catering.

0:09:49.367 --> 0:09:52.367
<v Speaker 3>That is a real skill. It can be kind of

0:09:52.767 --> 0:09:57.127
<v Speaker 3>disparaged in the treadwife world, but being a great cook

0:09:57.247 --> 0:09:59.247
<v Speaker 3>is like it's a really good skill. And then there's

0:09:59.527 --> 0:10:02.727
<v Speaker 3>interior design and then even like how to set a table,

0:10:03.047 --> 0:10:06.647
<v Speaker 3>like there is real status in that. And it's the

0:10:06.687 --> 0:10:09.767
<v Speaker 3>same with Zoe Foster Blake. I think this pouchhow is

0:10:09.847 --> 0:10:12.247
<v Speaker 3>very good at marketing. But I wonder if that's a

0:10:12.247 --> 0:10:14.807
<v Speaker 3>bit of the tension that's emerged between them.

0:10:15.687 --> 0:10:20.687
<v Speaker 1>I would call Zoe and Gwyneth and Martha influential, not

0:10:20.887 --> 0:10:24.967
<v Speaker 1>influenzas I would actually put Zoe quite separate. Although it's

0:10:25.007 --> 0:10:29.087
<v Speaker 1>interesting for all of those women, they are naturally talented

0:10:29.167 --> 0:10:32.287
<v Speaker 1>at a particular thing. For Zoe it's writing, she's a

0:10:32.327 --> 0:10:36.207
<v Speaker 1>brilliant writer. For Gwyneth, it's acting. For Martha, it was

0:10:36.287 --> 0:10:41.407
<v Speaker 1>actually cooking and homemaking. And I think what's interesting about

0:10:41.447 --> 0:10:43.807
<v Speaker 1>her and what the documentary, which she didn't like. By

0:10:43.847 --> 0:10:45.767
<v Speaker 1>the way, she's come out and said a whole lot

0:10:45.767 --> 0:10:47.647
<v Speaker 1>of things that she didn't like about it. You could

0:10:47.687 --> 0:10:50.607
<v Speaker 1>hear she probably didn't like that in exchange about the infidelity,

0:10:50.647 --> 0:10:54.447
<v Speaker 1>but she critiqued almost everything, from camera angles to music choices.

0:10:54.487 --> 0:10:57.687
<v Speaker 1>She told The New York Times she hated the scenes

0:10:57.727 --> 0:10:59.727
<v Speaker 1>at the end, where she said she looked like a

0:10:59.727 --> 0:11:02.767
<v Speaker 1>lonely old lady walking hunched over in the garden. She

0:11:02.847 --> 0:11:04.967
<v Speaker 1>didn't like how she looked on camera. She thought there

0:11:04.967 --> 0:11:08.127
<v Speaker 1>should have been more rap music involved and that would

0:11:08.167 --> 0:11:11.327
<v Speaker 1>have been more interesting. And it made me see how

0:11:11.327 --> 0:11:14.047
<v Speaker 1>many documentaries that we watch about celebrities, and there's a

0:11:14.087 --> 0:11:16.607
<v Speaker 1>whole host of them at the moment, from Harry and

0:11:16.687 --> 0:11:20.047
<v Speaker 1>Meghan to the David Beckham documentary. They're now making one

0:11:20.047 --> 0:11:24.127
<v Speaker 1>about Victoria Beckham, Taylor Swift. Of course, they all have

0:11:24.207 --> 0:11:28.887
<v Speaker 1>creative control and approval. And even Oprah, who Apple was

0:11:28.887 --> 0:11:32.247
<v Speaker 1>making a documentary about and they finished and she paid

0:11:32.367 --> 0:11:34.487
<v Speaker 1>to buy it back so it would never be released

0:11:34.527 --> 0:11:36.847
<v Speaker 1>because she didn't like it. And I think that's why

0:11:36.847 --> 0:11:38.967
<v Speaker 1>I like this documentary. What did it make you feel

0:11:39.007 --> 0:11:40.047
<v Speaker 1>about Martha herself?

0:11:40.087 --> 0:11:43.247
<v Speaker 2>Amelia, Well, I think that's why I want to push

0:11:43.327 --> 0:11:46.527
<v Speaker 2>back on Jesse's idea that it's about skill. I think

0:11:46.567 --> 0:11:50.207
<v Speaker 2>all three of these women are so smart, so brilliant,

0:11:50.367 --> 0:11:53.567
<v Speaker 2>they deserve every dollar that they've made. But I think

0:11:53.687 --> 0:11:58.447
<v Speaker 2>that their greatest skill is marketing. And is marketing an

0:11:58.487 --> 0:12:03.767
<v Speaker 2>idea of perfect imperfection or imperfect perfection. This word perfect

0:12:03.847 --> 0:12:06.247
<v Speaker 2>comes up for Martha all the time. That's what she

0:12:06.407 --> 0:12:09.247
<v Speaker 2>was selling with the perfectly made tables and the perfect

0:12:09.287 --> 0:12:10.247
<v Speaker 2>Thanksgiving turkeys.

0:12:10.767 --> 0:12:13.767
<v Speaker 1>But the idea is that she lets us.

0:12:13.567 --> 0:12:16.447
<v Speaker 2>In to tiny parts of her life that are anything

0:12:16.527 --> 0:12:19.567
<v Speaker 2>but perfect, and she keeps us wanting more from it.

0:12:19.647 --> 0:12:21.367
<v Speaker 2>So a couple of things that come up in the dosh.

0:12:21.287 --> 0:12:24.367
<v Speaker 1>You mean in the documentary, because not in her before

0:12:24.367 --> 0:12:27.207
<v Speaker 1>she went to prison, like her magazines and her public persona,

0:12:28.127 --> 0:12:30.207
<v Speaker 1>does she let us in she certainly didn't used to

0:12:30.247 --> 0:12:32.807
<v Speaker 1>because there was all that stuff about how she was

0:12:32.807 --> 0:12:35.327
<v Speaker 1>the Queen of mean before it came out about Ellen.

0:12:35.527 --> 0:12:38.847
<v Speaker 1>It reminded me so much of that thing about the

0:12:38.887 --> 0:12:41.927
<v Speaker 1>worst thing a woman can do in business or in

0:12:41.967 --> 0:12:45.967
<v Speaker 1>life is be assertive. And it showed some scenes of

0:12:46.007 --> 0:12:48.247
<v Speaker 1>Martha's Stewitt in the kitchen with people who were working

0:12:48.487 --> 0:12:51.767
<v Speaker 1>with her for her, and she was really rude to

0:12:51.807 --> 0:12:52.927
<v Speaker 1>them and really short.

0:12:53.367 --> 0:12:56.007
<v Speaker 2>That's true, but she's now a huge influencer in her

0:12:56.047 --> 0:12:58.767
<v Speaker 2>own right coming out of prison letting it all hang

0:12:58.767 --> 0:13:01.007
<v Speaker 2>out in this documentary. The New York Times had recently

0:13:01.327 --> 0:13:05.247
<v Speaker 2>that she is a gen Z beauty influencer, and she specifically,

0:13:05.567 --> 0:13:08.607
<v Speaker 2>what do you mean? So she advertises clay to Postkincare,

0:13:08.647 --> 0:13:11.247
<v Speaker 2>which is a really expensive skincare brand. The creams are

0:13:11.247 --> 0:13:13.767
<v Speaker 2>all four hundred dollars and up on TikTok from her

0:13:13.807 --> 0:13:17.807
<v Speaker 2>Connecticut mansion. She's routinely getting seventy eighty million views for

0:13:17.847 --> 0:13:22.167
<v Speaker 2>these skincare advertisements, and so the relatability of it is

0:13:22.207 --> 0:13:24.647
<v Speaker 2>part of why she's taken off with a new generation.

0:13:24.767 --> 0:13:26.647
<v Speaker 2>So let's run through a few things that she talks

0:13:26.687 --> 0:13:29.407
<v Speaker 2>about quite frankly in this documentary the first marriage ending

0:13:29.767 --> 0:13:32.367
<v Speaker 2>in divorce, as we've discussed, and she shares with the

0:13:32.407 --> 0:13:35.927
<v Speaker 2>documentary makers letters that she sent her ex husband begging

0:13:36.007 --> 0:13:38.887
<v Speaker 2>him to take her back. That's an extraordinary amount of disclosure.

0:13:39.007 --> 0:13:41.567
<v Speaker 1>That was quite j lo. I thought it was.

0:13:42.567 --> 0:13:45.167
<v Speaker 2>She's admitted that she didn't feel naturally maternal towards her

0:13:45.207 --> 0:13:47.447
<v Speaker 2>daughter Alexis, and this is something that her daughter has

0:13:47.487 --> 0:13:49.447
<v Speaker 2>spoken about over the years, the fact that while she

0:13:49.527 --> 0:13:51.527
<v Speaker 2>and her mother are very close, her mother was never

0:13:51.807 --> 0:13:55.567
<v Speaker 2>a straightforwardly maternal figure for her. She didn't come.

0:13:55.487 --> 0:13:58.967
<v Speaker 1>Across as very warm. And I kept finding myself texting, you,

0:13:59.567 --> 0:14:05.087
<v Speaker 1>have you ever seen a more unlikable woman like her? Unlikability?

0:14:05.127 --> 0:14:07.727
<v Speaker 1>And I know this is a real weapon that we

0:14:08.087 --> 0:14:10.807
<v Speaker 1>use against women, this idea of needing to be likable.

0:14:11.847 --> 0:14:14.447
<v Speaker 1>What was interesting is that she wasn't trying to be likable.

0:14:14.647 --> 0:14:18.847
<v Speaker 2>No, when Nora's Gwyneth, by the way, Gwyneth is also I.

0:14:18.727 --> 0:14:21.967
<v Speaker 1>Feel like Gwyneth tries to be likable. I think Martha

0:14:22.047 --> 0:14:24.127
<v Speaker 1>is really like, yeah, I didn't like being a mum

0:14:24.167 --> 0:14:26.807
<v Speaker 1>that much. My husband was a dickhead. People need to

0:14:26.807 --> 0:14:27.247
<v Speaker 1>be better.

0:14:27.447 --> 0:14:30.167
<v Speaker 2>She was on Drew Barrymore's show this week and Drew's

0:14:30.167 --> 0:14:33.367
<v Speaker 2>famously touchy with her guests, and she just pushed her away.

0:14:33.567 --> 0:14:34.167
<v Speaker 2>I loved that.

0:14:34.447 --> 0:14:38.327
<v Speaker 3>I think it's the complexity that makes her a complicated

0:14:38.887 --> 0:14:42.047
<v Speaker 3>monet painting that we can't stop staring at, because in

0:14:42.087 --> 0:14:45.607
<v Speaker 3>a lot of ways she actually subverts the feminine. It's like,

0:14:45.767 --> 0:14:49.567
<v Speaker 3>in one way she's the antitrad wife. Even her voice

0:14:49.607 --> 0:14:53.647
<v Speaker 3>is a bit deeper, she's disagreeable. She doesn't come across

0:14:53.647 --> 0:14:56.607
<v Speaker 3>as pleasant. It doesn't seem to be like her aim

0:14:56.687 --> 0:14:59.327
<v Speaker 3>to come across as pleasant. Like compare that to a

0:14:59.367 --> 0:15:03.767
<v Speaker 3>ballerina farm Hannah Nielman, who from the high voice to

0:15:03.887 --> 0:15:07.327
<v Speaker 3>the slow talking to the there's something so tranquil about

0:15:07.367 --> 0:15:08.567
<v Speaker 3>it and subservient.

0:15:08.607 --> 0:15:12.567
<v Speaker 1>They're both very much with Hannah Nielman's husband and Nara

0:15:12.687 --> 0:15:16.247
<v Speaker 1>Smith's husband, Lucky Blue. It's always in the service. They're

0:15:16.287 --> 0:15:18.647
<v Speaker 1>working in the service of their husband and children, and

0:15:18.687 --> 0:15:22.767
<v Speaker 1>they're always very much in the service. Whereas that's so interesting,

0:15:22.847 --> 0:15:26.527
<v Speaker 1>Martha's more about I'm doing this because I like, I

0:15:26.567 --> 0:15:28.887
<v Speaker 1>want a nice table, and I want to be gardening,

0:15:29.127 --> 0:15:31.607
<v Speaker 1>and I want to be making a nice Christmas dinner

0:15:31.687 --> 0:15:33.687
<v Speaker 1>because it gives me joy.

0:15:34.047 --> 0:15:36.047
<v Speaker 2>And she fucked the rest of you and she flirts

0:15:36.047 --> 0:15:38.007
<v Speaker 2>with the male gaze, but she also rejects it. So

0:15:38.047 --> 0:15:41.327
<v Speaker 2>she's on the cover of Sports Illustrated. She dates famous man.

0:15:41.367 --> 0:15:43.447
<v Speaker 2>She dated Anthony Hopkins, which I didn't know, but she

0:15:43.487 --> 0:15:45.247
<v Speaker 2>broke up with him because she said she couldn't stop

0:15:45.287 --> 0:15:49.327
<v Speaker 2>thinking about Hannibal Lecter. And she's spoken up very openly

0:15:49.327 --> 0:15:51.487
<v Speaker 2>about how difficult it has been for her to date

0:15:51.527 --> 0:15:52.647
<v Speaker 2>in midlife and beyond.

0:15:53.127 --> 0:15:55.767
<v Speaker 1>She's quite beyond midlife. I would say she's eighty three.

0:15:56.247 --> 0:15:57.167
<v Speaker 1>Is she still dating?

0:15:57.367 --> 0:15:58.687
<v Speaker 2>She is, And she.

0:15:58.687 --> 0:16:01.807
<v Speaker 3>Says that she's got no plans to retire, like she

0:16:01.807 --> 0:16:05.487
<v Speaker 3>doesn't see anything appealing about retirement. But I was thinking

0:16:05.527 --> 0:16:08.127
<v Speaker 3>about a quote I read recently about fame and how

0:16:08.167 --> 0:16:11.527
<v Speaker 3>people become famous to feel understood. That's the number one

0:16:11.567 --> 0:16:14.007
<v Speaker 3>reason is that they want people to understand them. And

0:16:14.087 --> 0:16:16.807
<v Speaker 3>after that documentary, there was a headline that said she

0:16:16.927 --> 0:16:19.607
<v Speaker 3>still doesn't feel understood, and she doesn't, and I wonder

0:16:19.647 --> 0:16:21.967
<v Speaker 3>if that's why she doesn't want to retire. She's not

0:16:22.007 --> 0:16:25.447
<v Speaker 3>done yet. She feels like people don't fully get her.

0:16:25.527 --> 0:16:28.447
<v Speaker 3>And that's my question, as someone who hasn't watched the documentary.

0:16:29.207 --> 0:16:32.287
<v Speaker 3>Are we laughing at Martha Stuart or are we laughing

0:16:32.367 --> 0:16:36.967
<v Speaker 3>with Martha Stuart because she's become this cultural icon in

0:16:37.007 --> 0:16:38.567
<v Speaker 3>the last few years. She kind of pops up with

0:16:38.687 --> 0:16:44.207
<v Speaker 3>Snoop Dogg. She's like, again, this complicated figure and I've

0:16:44.247 --> 0:16:47.927
<v Speaker 3>seen viral clips from this, like the one about her

0:16:47.967 --> 0:16:50.847
<v Speaker 3>affairs and her relationships and stuff, and I have a laugh.

0:16:51.767 --> 0:16:53.927
<v Speaker 3>But do you think she feels like we're laughing at her?

0:16:54.367 --> 0:16:59.327
<v Speaker 1>What a great question. No, I think that she's more like,

0:16:59.367 --> 0:17:02.247
<v Speaker 1>you know, how Betty White became iconic, Yeah, and Ruth

0:17:02.287 --> 0:17:04.727
<v Speaker 1>Baty Ginsburg was iconic. I know that's different. She was

0:17:04.767 --> 0:17:07.327
<v Speaker 1>the Supreme Court judge and has her own complicated history.

0:17:07.727 --> 0:17:11.527
<v Speaker 1>But I don't I think people are laughing at her.

0:17:11.687 --> 0:17:12.727
<v Speaker 1>I'm not laughing.

0:17:12.487 --> 0:17:14.047
<v Speaker 2>About Miron's another one.

0:17:14.447 --> 0:17:18.727
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, the Queen. Like it's kind of like, I

0:17:18.767 --> 0:17:20.887
<v Speaker 1>hate to say it, but like they're so old they're cool.

0:17:21.087 --> 0:17:23.687
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, exactly, It's like they've come back again. It's like retro.

0:17:24.527 --> 0:17:27.887
<v Speaker 3>Was this documentary good for her brand or bad?

0:17:28.327 --> 0:17:30.767
<v Speaker 2>Well? I think the very fact that she's still selling

0:17:30.807 --> 0:17:33.847
<v Speaker 2>really expensive skincare to gen z on TikTok means that

0:17:33.927 --> 0:17:36.247
<v Speaker 2>it was great for her brand. I think we now

0:17:36.367 --> 0:17:40.247
<v Speaker 2>crave the deconstruction of perfection that she's revealing to us

0:17:40.247 --> 0:17:42.607
<v Speaker 2>in this, don't you think, Miah, Yeah, And I think

0:17:42.647 --> 0:17:45.047
<v Speaker 2>that what it did do Jesse, that's so interesting what

0:17:45.087 --> 0:17:46.687
<v Speaker 2>you say about they want to be understood.

0:17:46.687 --> 0:17:51.167
<v Speaker 1>I think that's incredibly astute. I think what it reminded

0:17:51.207 --> 0:17:54.247
<v Speaker 1>me a little bit like watching the Menendez Brothers documentary.

0:17:54.727 --> 0:17:57.447
<v Speaker 1>I think, I know what I think about these people.

0:17:57.567 --> 0:18:00.127
<v Speaker 1>And I thought I knew what I thought about Martha Stewart,

0:18:00.767 --> 0:18:03.647
<v Speaker 1>but I changed my mind after watching the documentary and

0:18:03.687 --> 0:18:06.807
<v Speaker 1>I was like, oh, that was bullshit that she got

0:18:06.807 --> 0:18:09.887
<v Speaker 1>sent to prison. Yeah, it is like, yeah, soso bad.

0:18:09.927 --> 0:18:14.447
<v Speaker 1>And similarly to the Menandez brothers, like I thought that

0:18:14.527 --> 0:18:17.567
<v Speaker 1>they'd made up all those allegations. That was my understanding

0:18:17.647 --> 0:18:20.887
<v Speaker 1>because the reason I think that where relooking at all

0:18:20.927 --> 0:18:22.727
<v Speaker 1>of these things. You know, we've got this segment all

0:18:22.847 --> 0:18:26.287
<v Speaker 1>or nothing where you either know everything about a topic

0:18:26.407 --> 0:18:30.007
<v Speaker 1>or nothing. The Internet allows you to know everything about

0:18:30.007 --> 0:18:32.807
<v Speaker 1>any topic if you want to. But back in the

0:18:32.927 --> 0:18:36.127
<v Speaker 1>nineties and the eighties and until the last ten years,

0:18:36.367 --> 0:18:38.847
<v Speaker 1>there was a limited amount of information you could get

0:18:39.167 --> 0:18:41.327
<v Speaker 1>about a certain topic. You know, if you wanted to

0:18:41.367 --> 0:18:44.727
<v Speaker 1>dive deep, there wasn't really a way you could particularly

0:18:44.767 --> 0:18:47.687
<v Speaker 1>for someone like Martha Stewart who wasn't iconic in Australia,

0:18:47.767 --> 0:18:49.567
<v Speaker 1>and same with the Menendez brothers. I was kind of

0:18:49.567 --> 0:18:53.007
<v Speaker 1>dimly aware of that story, but now it's like these

0:18:53.047 --> 0:18:54.807
<v Speaker 1>stories are international.

0:18:55.167 --> 0:18:58.367
<v Speaker 2>You're also making me think about how I felt after

0:18:58.407 --> 0:19:01.727
<v Speaker 2>watching Harry and Meghan's documentary versus how I felt watching this.

0:19:02.287 --> 0:19:05.167
<v Speaker 2>Once I'd watched Harry and Megan's documentary, I didn't need

0:19:05.207 --> 0:19:09.767
<v Speaker 2>to know anything else. But having watched the Martha documentary,

0:19:10.607 --> 0:19:13.527
<v Speaker 2>it's like Jesse said, she's a monet painting. I want

0:19:13.527 --> 0:19:15.847
<v Speaker 2>to know everything, and I still don't know everything.

0:19:15.967 --> 0:19:17.887
<v Speaker 1>When you say that about Harry and Meghan, do you

0:19:17.967 --> 0:19:20.847
<v Speaker 1>mean I'd like I'd eaten too much at the buffet,

0:19:21.007 --> 0:19:24.167
<v Speaker 1>Like all the mystery was gone, all the interest was gone.

0:19:24.607 --> 0:19:28.047
<v Speaker 2>There wasn't the push pull of that collaboration between a

0:19:28.127 --> 0:19:31.527
<v Speaker 2>director and their subject. This was more of a push

0:19:31.567 --> 0:19:34.567
<v Speaker 2>pool dynamic, and so there were points where it was uncomfortable.

0:19:34.567 --> 0:19:36.207
<v Speaker 2>There are a lot of points where it was uncomfortable.

0:19:36.287 --> 0:19:39.007
<v Speaker 2>The filmmaker would leave the camera on Martha as she

0:19:39.127 --> 0:19:41.247
<v Speaker 2>finished a thought and then wanted the camera to be

0:19:41.287 --> 0:19:44.247
<v Speaker 2>turned off, and I felt like that push pool made

0:19:44.327 --> 0:19:45.287
<v Speaker 2>me want to know more.

0:19:45.647 --> 0:19:48.127
<v Speaker 3>The other thing that Martha appears to have done, at

0:19:48.207 --> 0:19:50.727
<v Speaker 3>least in what I've read and clips I've seen, is

0:19:50.767 --> 0:19:54.487
<v Speaker 3>that she owns that she's really, really rich, and she

0:19:54.607 --> 0:19:57.287
<v Speaker 3>quite likes being really really rich, which we don't see

0:19:57.447 --> 0:20:01.207
<v Speaker 3>very often with women in Australia. You would never ever

0:20:01.207 --> 0:20:04.447
<v Speaker 3>get away with it. But watching that and watching a

0:20:04.487 --> 0:20:10.807
<v Speaker 3>woman who owns it is sort of refreshing, but also complicated.

0:20:10.487 --> 0:20:14.207
<v Speaker 1>The fact that she's self made. And I keep coming

0:20:14.247 --> 0:20:16.807
<v Speaker 1>back to what you say about not feeling understood. She

0:20:16.887 --> 0:20:20.647
<v Speaker 1>doesn't get the credit she deserves, as so many female

0:20:20.687 --> 0:20:24.687
<v Speaker 1>business owners don't, and I would include Zoe among them,

0:20:25.007 --> 0:20:29.327
<v Speaker 1>where it's like they have built these multi million dollar

0:20:29.407 --> 0:20:33.887
<v Speaker 1>empires entirely on their own, and that's pretty bloody impressive.

0:20:34.687 --> 0:20:37.447
<v Speaker 1>Is she still as culturally relevant in America as she

0:20:37.687 --> 0:20:38.207
<v Speaker 1>used to be?

0:20:38.607 --> 0:20:40.567
<v Speaker 2>I think she's even more so. They talk about in

0:20:40.647 --> 0:20:43.047
<v Speaker 2>the documentary. This big turning point for her was when

0:20:43.087 --> 0:20:46.927
<v Speaker 2>she went on a roast of Justin Bieber in twenty fourteen.

0:20:47.287 --> 0:20:49.567
<v Speaker 2>That's when she actually met Snoop Dogg and they became

0:20:49.687 --> 0:20:52.487
<v Speaker 2>very good friends. She had been out of the public

0:20:52.487 --> 0:20:55.327
<v Speaker 2>eye for a long time after prison. She was a

0:20:55.367 --> 0:20:58.047
<v Speaker 2>punchline to your earlier question, Jesse, she was a South

0:20:58.047 --> 0:21:00.847
<v Speaker 2>Park punchline in fact, But then when she went back

0:21:00.887 --> 0:21:03.607
<v Speaker 2>on Comedy Central and this roast of Justin Bieber, people

0:21:03.727 --> 0:21:06.687
<v Speaker 2>thought that the jokes were really ribald and funny and

0:21:06.727 --> 0:21:09.567
<v Speaker 2>definitely pushed the envelope. Were you shocked by that? I didn't.

0:21:09.607 --> 0:21:11.727
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I didn't get to that part of the documentary.

0:21:11.767 --> 0:21:12.727
<v Speaker 1>I got distracted.

0:21:13.367 --> 0:21:15.767
<v Speaker 2>Well, I was shocked by the jokes and how like,

0:21:15.807 --> 0:21:17.647
<v Speaker 2>what were they? They really pushed the envelope.

0:21:17.847 --> 0:21:19.647
<v Speaker 1>Rip bold is not a word you hear often on

0:21:19.727 --> 0:21:20.447
<v Speaker 1>this podcast.

0:21:20.967 --> 0:21:22.927
<v Speaker 2>There were jokes that sort of pushed the envelope in

0:21:23.007 --> 0:21:25.607
<v Speaker 2>terms of how you talk about race. There were jokes

0:21:25.647 --> 0:21:28.087
<v Speaker 2>that also people made fun of her for being really,

0:21:28.127 --> 0:21:30.687
<v Speaker 2>really old, and she laughed about it, wearing her leather

0:21:30.767 --> 0:21:34.007
<v Speaker 2>leggings and her Dreasman note and embroidered jacket. I mean,

0:21:34.047 --> 0:21:36.647
<v Speaker 2>she just came across as tough as nails, and I

0:21:36.687 --> 0:21:39.647
<v Speaker 2>think we really at this point respond to that and

0:21:39.687 --> 0:21:40.647
<v Speaker 2>with no fucks to give.

0:21:41.087 --> 0:21:42.567
<v Speaker 3>It's nice to see Snoop again.

0:21:42.647 --> 0:21:45.567
<v Speaker 7>One of the highest rated episodes on my show, Martha

0:21:45.647 --> 0:21:48.927
<v Speaker 7>Stewart Living was when Snoop and I made brownies together.

0:21:50.087 --> 0:21:53.487
<v Speaker 7>And I've used this recipe ever since. As a matter

0:21:53.527 --> 0:21:56.807
<v Speaker 7>of fact, I ate three of them right before they

0:21:56.887 --> 0:21:58.327
<v Speaker 7>called and asked me to do this.

0:21:58.527 --> 0:22:03.047
<v Speaker 2>Rose in a moment. A UK TV presenter made a

0:22:03.127 --> 0:22:06.207
<v Speaker 2>comment about Kate Middleton on the weekend and let's just

0:22:06.247 --> 0:22:15.127
<v Speaker 2>say it got us all thinking out loud.

0:22:16.287 --> 0:22:20.087
<v Speaker 3>An article ran in Grazia on Tuesday with the headline

0:22:20.207 --> 0:22:24.487
<v Speaker 3>She's aged so much. The vile commentary around Kate Middleton's

0:22:24.487 --> 0:22:28.447
<v Speaker 3>appearance needs to stop. At first, I rolled my eyes

0:22:28.527 --> 0:22:32.607
<v Speaker 3>because it felt like one of those classic Internet tropes

0:22:32.927 --> 0:22:36.567
<v Speaker 3>of using mock horror to incentivize people to click on

0:22:36.807 --> 0:22:40.647
<v Speaker 3>a less than flattering photo. I thought, this is just

0:22:40.767 --> 0:22:45.127
<v Speaker 3>engagement baiting. The publication says, they're saying this is a

0:22:45.207 --> 0:22:49.087
<v Speaker 3>terrible photo. They're saying she looks old, how offensive. Here's

0:22:49.087 --> 0:22:51.887
<v Speaker 3>the photo, please leave comments below. And from that I

0:22:52.007 --> 0:22:54.687
<v Speaker 3>just went I'm not going to engage. But then I

0:22:54.727 --> 0:22:57.447
<v Speaker 3>saw where the comments had come from and I thought

0:22:57.447 --> 0:23:00.767
<v Speaker 3>that this actually was a valid news story. First, I

0:23:00.767 --> 0:23:04.287
<v Speaker 3>should say Kate Middleton, the Princess of Wales, appeared at

0:23:04.327 --> 0:23:08.247
<v Speaker 3>a remembrance Sunday service in London and since completing her

0:23:08.327 --> 0:23:13.567
<v Speaker 3>chemotherapy treat in September, She's been slowly returning to royal duties,

0:23:14.047 --> 0:23:16.567
<v Speaker 3>and images of her in a black dress and a

0:23:16.607 --> 0:23:20.807
<v Speaker 3>black hat were published widely online. We can, of course

0:23:20.847 --> 0:23:23.527
<v Speaker 3>expect the internet to be cruel, there's nothing new about that.

0:23:24.327 --> 0:23:27.687
<v Speaker 3>But there was one particular comment on X from a

0:23:27.807 --> 0:23:32.007
<v Speaker 3>high profile British TV presenter who regularly appears on Good

0:23:32.007 --> 0:23:35.007
<v Speaker 3>Morning Britain and Loose Women. Her name is Narinda Corp.

0:23:35.367 --> 0:23:39.007
<v Speaker 3>She shared an image of Middleton with the comment genuine question,

0:23:39.487 --> 0:23:42.687
<v Speaker 3>why has Kate aged so much? Isn't she only forty two?

0:23:43.287 --> 0:23:45.847
<v Speaker 3>Is she a smoker? It's the only explanation.

0:23:46.247 --> 0:23:47.447
<v Speaker 1>Was she high? This woman?

0:23:47.687 --> 0:23:50.767
<v Speaker 3>It's the most bizarre tweet.

0:23:50.527 --> 0:23:52.127
<v Speaker 1>If you want to think it. I can't control what

0:23:52.167 --> 0:23:55.567
<v Speaker 1>you think, but like, firstly, did you miss the cancer part?

0:23:55.647 --> 0:23:58.567
<v Speaker 1>And secondly why share that with the world? Like what

0:23:58.687 --> 0:23:59.927
<v Speaker 1>did she think she was doing?

0:24:00.087 --> 0:24:04.527
<v Speaker 3>Yes? So she's since apologized. Unsurprisingly, she faced a lot

0:24:04.527 --> 0:24:08.367
<v Speaker 3>of backlash. She apologized with a video on social media,

0:24:08.407 --> 0:24:09.487
<v Speaker 3>and here's what she said.

0:24:09.647 --> 0:24:12.607
<v Speaker 4>I put out a stupid tweet that wasn't my intention.

0:24:12.727 --> 0:24:16.447
<v Speaker 4>My intent was not to be malicious or nasty or anything.

0:24:16.647 --> 0:24:18.967
<v Speaker 4>I'm not like that. Anybody who knows me it was

0:24:19.047 --> 0:24:21.767
<v Speaker 4>stupid to ask about the aging. I've admitted that, and

0:24:21.847 --> 0:24:24.767
<v Speaker 4>I put my hands up and I've apologized if it

0:24:24.807 --> 0:24:29.207
<v Speaker 4>caused offense. I didn't wish death on anyone. I didn't

0:24:29.247 --> 0:24:33.607
<v Speaker 4>do anything like that. I asked about aging. She smoked

0:24:34.927 --> 0:24:36.967
<v Speaker 4>nothing to do with cancer.

0:24:37.447 --> 0:24:39.367
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so I think that the emission of the cancer

0:24:39.407 --> 0:24:42.167
<v Speaker 3>was actually kind of the problem. But Google trends, since

0:24:42.207 --> 0:24:44.687
<v Speaker 3>all this has happened, Google Trends shows a spike in

0:24:44.767 --> 0:24:49.567
<v Speaker 3>searchers for Kate Middleton looks Tired, Kate Middleton aging, and

0:24:49.687 --> 0:24:53.727
<v Speaker 3>Kate Middleton looks old. My question is what is wrong

0:24:53.767 --> 0:24:54.127
<v Speaker 3>with us?

0:24:54.327 --> 0:24:57.567
<v Speaker 2>My question is how are those Google searchers. Kate Middleton

0:24:57.647 --> 0:24:59.087
<v Speaker 2>looks tired is a statement.

0:25:00.207 --> 0:25:02.807
<v Speaker 1>I would defend that, not defendant explain it in saying,

0:25:02.847 --> 0:25:05.967
<v Speaker 1>if you're looking for the original, you'd heard something about

0:25:05.967 --> 0:25:07.727
<v Speaker 1>it and you wanted you knew it would link you

0:25:07.767 --> 0:25:11.087
<v Speaker 1>with the photo or the original apsource material. I'm going

0:25:11.127 --> 0:25:14.687
<v Speaker 1>to now not defend nerindacal, but kind of defend her

0:25:14.847 --> 0:25:16.687
<v Speaker 1>after saying I think she was high, and of course

0:25:16.687 --> 0:25:18.727
<v Speaker 1>she should never have said it. What I think this

0:25:18.807 --> 0:25:22.527
<v Speaker 1>is an indication of, however, is actually nothing to do

0:25:22.567 --> 0:25:25.007
<v Speaker 1>with Kate Middleton it's about the fact that we don't

0:25:25.047 --> 0:25:28.007
<v Speaker 1>know what women look like anymore. We're just not sure

0:25:28.287 --> 0:25:32.367
<v Speaker 1>what women are meant to look like because everyone famous

0:25:32.727 --> 0:25:36.367
<v Speaker 1>kind of looks this same weird age, whether they're Nicole

0:25:36.447 --> 0:25:40.087
<v Speaker 1>Kidman who's almost sixty, or Kylie Jenner. Everyone is sort

0:25:40.087 --> 0:25:43.687
<v Speaker 1>of this nondescript, strange age. So if there's a time

0:25:44.807 --> 0:25:49.047
<v Speaker 1>that a woman is perhaps not having the tweakments that

0:25:49.127 --> 0:25:53.327
<v Speaker 1>she once had, or she is tired, or maybe she's

0:25:53.367 --> 0:25:57.167
<v Speaker 1>recovering from cancer, or who knows what is happening, we're

0:25:57.207 --> 0:26:00.407
<v Speaker 1>just like, oh, wait, what does a female face look

0:26:00.567 --> 0:26:04.167
<v Speaker 1>like anymore? I actually don't know. And it's something that

0:26:04.487 --> 0:26:07.287
<v Speaker 1>friends and I in my group chats often do when

0:26:07.367 --> 0:26:10.687
<v Speaker 1>we see someone's not in this way where it's like, oh,

0:26:10.727 --> 0:26:14.527
<v Speaker 1>doesn't she look tired. It's almost like a CSI forensic

0:26:14.567 --> 0:26:20.767
<v Speaker 1>analysis of trying to understand how women look a certain way,

0:26:21.687 --> 0:26:24.247
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily because we want to emulate them, but just

0:26:24.287 --> 0:26:26.927
<v Speaker 1>trying to understand this look that people have.

0:26:27.247 --> 0:26:30.327
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's like the old adage that cosmetic surgery doesn't

0:26:30.367 --> 0:26:33.047
<v Speaker 2>necessarily make you look younger, it just makes it look

0:26:33.127 --> 0:26:36.407
<v Speaker 2>like you had cosmetic surgery. And when now there's this

0:26:36.567 --> 0:26:41.047
<v Speaker 2>growing bucket of women for whom age is just a

0:26:41.127 --> 0:26:43.767
<v Speaker 2>number and they're sort of untethered from the timeline.

0:26:44.087 --> 0:26:48.487
<v Speaker 3>I think that the chemo, the health context, and the

0:26:48.527 --> 0:26:52.047
<v Speaker 3>smoking comment is all really critical to this story. The

0:26:52.127 --> 0:26:56.727
<v Speaker 3>smoking comment was so revealing, and it was revealing because

0:26:57.247 --> 0:27:01.687
<v Speaker 3>we look at aging now as a personal failing, almost

0:27:01.807 --> 0:27:05.927
<v Speaker 3>like I can see that you haven't prioritized your health, But.

0:27:05.967 --> 0:27:08.887
<v Speaker 1>Isn't it I know you haven't prioritized your face.

0:27:09.407 --> 0:27:12.007
<v Speaker 3>Yes, but I think that what we've done is we

0:27:12.087 --> 0:27:14.927
<v Speaker 3>have made your face a proxy for health in a

0:27:14.927 --> 0:27:18.407
<v Speaker 3>way that's not the truth, but that's what we It's

0:27:18.447 --> 0:27:22.247
<v Speaker 3>like the shorthand now is someone goes and gets the

0:27:22.287 --> 0:27:25.687
<v Speaker 3>tweakments and they look well, and so it's almost like

0:27:25.807 --> 0:27:28.927
<v Speaker 3>this moral failing if you don't get all of those,

0:27:29.007 --> 0:27:32.127
<v Speaker 3>because people go, oh, that is the number one reason

0:27:32.327 --> 0:27:34.727
<v Speaker 3>women I know say they've had the tweagments is that

0:27:34.767 --> 0:27:37.367
<v Speaker 3>they don't want to look tired. Not that they want

0:27:37.367 --> 0:27:39.727
<v Speaker 3>to look younger, but that they want to look well.

0:27:39.847 --> 0:27:41.207
<v Speaker 3>They want to look healthy.

0:27:40.927 --> 0:27:43.407
<v Speaker 1>Because we're a raising effort. Isn't that what it's all about?

0:27:43.447 --> 0:27:46.367
<v Speaker 1>Isn't that what beauty standards are about? Back to Martha Stewart,

0:27:46.407 --> 0:27:51.167
<v Speaker 1>and influencers. We're raising the effort and we're also raising

0:27:51.487 --> 0:27:55.487
<v Speaker 1>the biology of growing older because ironically, if Kate and

0:27:55.527 --> 0:27:57.967
<v Speaker 1>it's just seems so yucky to even be talking about this,

0:27:58.007 --> 0:28:00.847
<v Speaker 1>but if Kate is looking a certain way, you know,

0:28:00.887 --> 0:28:04.207
<v Speaker 1>she also got criticized and people commented when she looked

0:28:04.247 --> 0:28:09.247
<v Speaker 1>completely untouched by her cancer treatment when she was first

0:28:09.527 --> 0:28:12.527
<v Speaker 1>appeared at the Trooping of the Color in that white dress.

0:28:12.967 --> 0:28:15.407
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's so interesting, Jesse, because it made

0:28:15.407 --> 0:28:19.927
<v Speaker 1>me think about the controversy that happened in twenty thirteen

0:28:19.967 --> 0:28:23.287
<v Speaker 1>when Hillary Mantel, the late book Or Prize winner, gave

0:28:23.327 --> 0:28:25.807
<v Speaker 1>a lecture at the British Museum called Royal Bodies. And

0:28:25.847 --> 0:28:28.447
<v Speaker 1>it was around the time, ironically, Kate had withdrawn from

0:28:28.447 --> 0:28:32.727
<v Speaker 1>public life because she had severe morning sickness. And what

0:28:32.847 --> 0:28:35.727
<v Speaker 1>she said was she was talking about the role of

0:28:36.207 --> 0:28:39.807
<v Speaker 1>royal women and how essentially their role is purely to

0:28:39.887 --> 0:28:43.007
<v Speaker 1>be ornamental and it is purely about their esthetics and

0:28:43.087 --> 0:28:46.367
<v Speaker 1>also breed. And she said Kate seems to have been

0:28:46.367 --> 0:28:49.487
<v Speaker 1>selected for her role of princess because she was irreproachable,

0:28:49.527 --> 0:28:52.767
<v Speaker 1>as painfully thin as anyone could wish, without quirks, without oddities,

0:28:53.047 --> 0:28:55.927
<v Speaker 1>without the risk of the emergence of character. She appears

0:28:55.967 --> 0:28:59.487
<v Speaker 1>precision made, machine made, so different from Diana, whose human

0:28:59.527 --> 0:29:03.807
<v Speaker 1>awkwardness and emotional incontinence showed her every gesture. I thought

0:29:03.887 --> 0:29:07.327
<v Speaker 1>this was so interesting because as much like that is

0:29:07.407 --> 0:29:10.567
<v Speaker 1>Kate's role. It's not to have a person or opinions,

0:29:10.687 --> 0:29:13.047
<v Speaker 1>or to do a physical job. It's to be ornamental

0:29:13.167 --> 0:29:18.607
<v Speaker 1>and shine the light of her attractiveness on whatever she's

0:29:18.607 --> 0:29:21.927
<v Speaker 1>standing next to, whether it's the king or the heir,

0:29:22.087 --> 0:29:25.127
<v Speaker 1>her son, or the charity that she's promoting.

0:29:25.367 --> 0:29:27.487
<v Speaker 2>Mantel got a lot of criticism for that at the time,

0:29:27.527 --> 0:29:30.647
<v Speaker 2>I remember, and then eventually she came out and said, look,

0:29:30.687 --> 0:29:33.807
<v Speaker 2>that wasn't intended as criticism. I was actually trying to

0:29:33.927 --> 0:29:37.367
<v Speaker 2>sympathize with Kate's plight. She is trapped. She has to

0:29:37.407 --> 0:29:41.127
<v Speaker 2>be perfect no matter what, and that's very much a prison.

0:29:41.567 --> 0:29:43.287
<v Speaker 2>And it made me think of the fact that she

0:29:43.367 --> 0:29:46.767
<v Speaker 2>got all this criticism Kate did when that video came

0:29:46.767 --> 0:29:50.087
<v Speaker 2>out recently of her and the family announcing that she

0:29:50.167 --> 0:29:54.167
<v Speaker 2>had completed her treatment. A Guardian article by Hillary Osborne,

0:29:54.567 --> 0:29:57.287
<v Speaker 2>which was published about that video, described it as soft focus.

0:29:57.407 --> 0:29:59.847
<v Speaker 2>She was very disparaging. She said that look. The author

0:29:59.887 --> 0:30:02.207
<v Speaker 2>had been through cancer treatment, and she said, I found

0:30:02.247 --> 0:30:05.807
<v Speaker 2>this video upsetting because it seemed to underplay the strain

0:30:05.887 --> 0:30:07.127
<v Speaker 2>of cancer treatment. Yeah.

0:30:07.127 --> 0:30:09.927
<v Speaker 1>I was joking with my friends if she's out scouting

0:30:09.927 --> 0:30:12.847
<v Speaker 1>for fields to run through. But I don't blame Kate

0:30:12.967 --> 0:30:16.567
<v Speaker 1>Middleton for doing that, because that's what the public needs.

0:30:16.607 --> 0:30:18.887
<v Speaker 2>If she doesn't do it, she's told that she's a

0:30:19.127 --> 0:30:22.527
<v Speaker 2>secret smoker who's tired. Yeah, she really is trapped in

0:30:22.567 --> 0:30:25.887
<v Speaker 2>that way that Hillary Mantel highlighted. That same article had

0:30:25.887 --> 0:30:27.767
<v Speaker 2>a phrase in it that I've been thinking about a lot.

0:30:27.807 --> 0:30:30.527
<v Speaker 2>I have some loved ones going through cancer treatment. She

0:30:30.607 --> 0:30:32.887
<v Speaker 2>talked to in the article about how after you finish chemo,

0:30:33.127 --> 0:30:36.367
<v Speaker 2>you linger in a sort of grayness, and that idea

0:30:36.407 --> 0:30:40.287
<v Speaker 2>of grayness and the physical aftershocks of it go beyond

0:30:40.527 --> 0:30:42.487
<v Speaker 2>the hair that we all think of, for instance, to

0:30:42.567 --> 0:30:47.007
<v Speaker 2>this overall grayness of demeanor. And it must be really

0:30:47.087 --> 0:30:50.487
<v Speaker 2>hard if you are expected to be a perfect plastic princess,

0:30:50.727 --> 0:30:54.047
<v Speaker 2>as Hillary Mantel put it, when you're feeling that grayness.

0:30:54.567 --> 0:30:57.927
<v Speaker 3>Yes, there is the particular role that a princess plays,

0:30:58.487 --> 0:31:02.967
<v Speaker 3>but even for women who have survived cancer, and that

0:31:03.127 --> 0:31:06.527
<v Speaker 3>is a whole you know, physical experience I can't begin

0:31:06.607 --> 0:31:08.927
<v Speaker 3>to imagine. But a lot of my friends who have

0:31:08.927 --> 0:31:12.447
<v Speaker 3>then me into the next stage have talked about struggling

0:31:12.487 --> 0:31:15.207
<v Speaker 3>with body image, have talked about like, as you say,

0:31:15.367 --> 0:31:19.287
<v Speaker 3>from the skin to weight fluctuations, to the hair to

0:31:19.847 --> 0:31:22.527
<v Speaker 3>even like sex drive, all that kind of stuff, which

0:31:22.567 --> 0:31:26.487
<v Speaker 3>feels like such a silly thing to even worry about

0:31:26.687 --> 0:31:29.927
<v Speaker 3>in the wake of a brush with your own mortality.

0:31:30.327 --> 0:31:33.047
<v Speaker 1>But you're not free of beauty standards even when you're facing,

0:31:33.487 --> 0:31:35.127
<v Speaker 1>you know, a serious illness.

0:31:35.287 --> 0:31:38.007
<v Speaker 3>And this is just the classic. Yeah, it's a comment

0:31:38.047 --> 0:31:40.847
<v Speaker 3>about Kate, and it's very specific to that scenario, but

0:31:40.967 --> 0:31:44.887
<v Speaker 3>also to anyone who's had a really rough year and

0:31:45.047 --> 0:31:47.647
<v Speaker 3>is thinking I'm not looking my best. They just got

0:31:47.727 --> 0:31:51.167
<v Speaker 3>told you know exactly what everyone's thinking of you. Like,

0:31:51.287 --> 0:31:56.687
<v Speaker 3>let's remember Kate's year. In January, she underwent major abdominal surgery.

0:31:57.127 --> 0:32:02.247
<v Speaker 3>By March, it was that photoshopping controversy. Later that month,

0:32:02.447 --> 0:32:06.647
<v Speaker 3>she announces the cancer diagnosis. She then shares an update

0:32:06.687 --> 0:32:11.007
<v Speaker 3>in June, we know that she's undergoing preventative September, she

0:32:11.047 --> 0:32:14.327
<v Speaker 3>releases the video that we all saw, and she's only

0:32:14.487 --> 0:32:17.487
<v Speaker 3>just in the last few months returned to any royal duties.

0:32:17.887 --> 0:32:20.447
<v Speaker 3>That is a shit year, Like that is a really

0:32:20.487 --> 0:32:23.647
<v Speaker 3>shit year. And she turned up to this event over

0:32:23.687 --> 0:32:27.047
<v Speaker 3>the weekend for Remembrance Day, which obviously you know was

0:32:27.087 --> 0:32:29.567
<v Speaker 3>important to her and it's an important part of her role,

0:32:30.407 --> 0:32:32.567
<v Speaker 3>and people tell her she looks like shit. Like that

0:32:32.767 --> 0:32:35.647
<v Speaker 3>is just the cruelty of that and what it reveals

0:32:35.647 --> 0:32:38.047
<v Speaker 3>about our culture is so disturbing.

0:32:38.247 --> 0:32:41.407
<v Speaker 1>But it's not as though she's not aware of her

0:32:41.527 --> 0:32:44.967
<v Speaker 1>role and of society's expectations. And it was so interesting

0:32:46.207 --> 0:32:48.847
<v Speaker 1>seeing her at the trooping of the color and everything

0:32:49.287 --> 0:32:51.647
<v Speaker 1>she did was so coded. She had a tight white

0:32:51.727 --> 0:32:54.847
<v Speaker 1>dress on. I read a lot of think pieces around

0:32:54.927 --> 0:32:58.087
<v Speaker 1>that afterwards, and some people were disappointed that she looked

0:32:58.127 --> 0:33:01.527
<v Speaker 1>untouched by cancer and felt that it didn't, as you say,

0:33:01.567 --> 0:33:07.567
<v Speaker 1>reflect their experience, and others were comforted because they thought, oh,

0:33:07.847 --> 0:33:12.647
<v Speaker 1>after my cancer experience, I too could be back to

0:33:12.727 --> 0:33:16.167
<v Speaker 1>my normal self. And it reminded me of those bodies

0:33:16.207 --> 0:33:20.167
<v Speaker 1>bouncing back after babies, and that whole disgusting thing that

0:33:20.247 --> 0:33:23.567
<v Speaker 1>used to be on magazine covers and is now on

0:33:23.767 --> 0:33:28.447
<v Speaker 1>Instagram in many places where it's like we must raise

0:33:28.687 --> 0:33:36.447
<v Speaker 1>all signs of pain, trouble, emotional frailty, physical change from

0:33:36.607 --> 0:33:39.207
<v Speaker 1>women's faces and bodies. That's what our culture demands.

0:33:39.407 --> 0:33:41.407
<v Speaker 2>But I think it's interesting you bring up birth because

0:33:41.447 --> 0:33:44.487
<v Speaker 2>Kate's always been quietly courageous on this front. I don't

0:33:44.487 --> 0:33:47.567
<v Speaker 2>think Hillary Mantel ultimately gave her enough credit. Remember when

0:33:48.047 --> 0:33:51.007
<v Speaker 2>after her oldest son was born, George, they came out

0:33:51.007 --> 0:33:55.487
<v Speaker 2>of the hospital and she had still a visible bump,

0:33:55.687 --> 0:33:58.087
<v Speaker 2>but it was physically impossible for her not to have

0:33:58.167 --> 0:34:01.087
<v Speaker 2>had a physical change of shape, right, But she didn't

0:34:01.127 --> 0:34:03.287
<v Speaker 2>have to come out and do that right then and there.

0:34:03.527 --> 0:34:05.767
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think she did. That was before Meghan had

0:34:05.847 --> 0:34:09.367
<v Speaker 1>reset the standards. That was a you know, it was

0:34:09.407 --> 0:34:11.607
<v Speaker 1>the son of the heir to the throne. I don't

0:34:11.647 --> 0:34:13.607
<v Speaker 1>think she couldn't, but I know what you mean. She

0:34:13.687 --> 0:34:18.007
<v Speaker 1>did choose a dress that showed I remember thinking at

0:34:18.007 --> 0:34:21.647
<v Speaker 1>the time feeling so grateful and how pitiful it was

0:34:22.087 --> 0:34:24.887
<v Speaker 1>because she looked perfect in every other way. You're right,

0:34:24.927 --> 0:34:27.247
<v Speaker 1>there was this tiny trace that was of course gone

0:34:27.287 --> 0:34:29.167
<v Speaker 1>by the time we next saw her. And again, not

0:34:29.247 --> 0:34:33.407
<v Speaker 1>criticism of her, but it's this beauty standard that insists women,

0:34:33.487 --> 0:34:35.447
<v Speaker 1>no matter what we're going through, no matter how old

0:34:35.527 --> 0:34:37.127
<v Speaker 1>or young we are, you can even see it in

0:34:37.167 --> 0:34:40.367
<v Speaker 1>Martha Stewart. She's eighty three, and yet she still has

0:34:40.447 --> 0:34:42.567
<v Speaker 1>to be relevant. She has to pose for the cover

0:34:42.647 --> 0:34:44.567
<v Speaker 1>of Sports Illustrated Swimsuit is she.

0:34:44.727 --> 0:34:46.847
<v Speaker 3>And the irony of this is that when you look

0:34:46.887 --> 0:34:50.207
<v Speaker 3>at that photo, she has had her makeup professionally done,

0:34:50.287 --> 0:34:52.407
<v Speaker 3>she's had her hair professionally done, she's had all the

0:34:52.447 --> 0:34:56.647
<v Speaker 3>clothes are immaculate, and still it wasn't enough. It's not

0:34:56.687 --> 0:34:59.927
<v Speaker 3>like she wasn't trying. She was, and still it was

0:35:00.047 --> 0:35:01.927
<v Speaker 3>like there was still criticism.

0:35:02.687 --> 0:35:05.567
<v Speaker 1>Before we move on, I want to just do a

0:35:05.607 --> 0:35:08.287
<v Speaker 1>little quick bit of feedback as a gift.

0:35:09.287 --> 0:35:10.447
<v Speaker 8>Oh, thanks for the feedback.

0:35:10.647 --> 0:35:12.087
<v Speaker 3>Great, I'd love your feedback.

0:35:12.687 --> 0:35:13.527
<v Speaker 7>What a gift.

0:35:15.607 --> 0:35:18.447
<v Speaker 3>I always worry that you've got feedback for me that

0:35:18.487 --> 0:35:20.367
<v Speaker 3>you're saying is a gift. Every time you bring this up,

0:35:20.407 --> 0:35:21.767
<v Speaker 3>I bristle because I am scared.

0:35:22.127 --> 0:35:24.487
<v Speaker 1>No, it's a new segment that I want to introduce

0:35:24.527 --> 0:35:27.367
<v Speaker 1>where anyone can bring a little bit of feedback, because feedback,

0:35:27.407 --> 0:35:29.367
<v Speaker 1>as we say here at MMA mea feedback is a gift.

0:35:29.527 --> 0:35:31.527
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you told me last week my shirt was terrible.

0:35:31.567 --> 0:35:32.207
<v Speaker 2>That was a gift.

0:35:32.247 --> 0:35:34.807
<v Speaker 1>That was a gift. I said, burn your linen short

0:35:34.807 --> 0:35:37.607
<v Speaker 1>sleeved shirt. That was my feedback. It was indeed a gift.

0:35:38.447 --> 0:35:42.327
<v Speaker 1>My gift this week is to women writers on the

0:35:42.407 --> 0:35:47.167
<v Speaker 1>internet and also people interviewing women or men. It's a

0:35:47.207 --> 0:35:51.287
<v Speaker 1>mostly female thing. Please stop writing letters to your younger self.

0:35:51.607 --> 0:35:53.847
<v Speaker 3>Why has this riled you? What has come up in

0:35:53.927 --> 0:35:56.727
<v Speaker 3>your life? Because this is it. It's a thing. I'm

0:35:56.767 --> 0:35:59.847
<v Speaker 3>sure that we have dozens of them on a website

0:35:59.887 --> 0:36:02.607
<v Speaker 3>called Mamma Maya. Why today has this upset you?

0:36:03.007 --> 0:36:05.807
<v Speaker 1>It's been growing on me. The feedback has been brewing

0:36:05.847 --> 0:36:09.887
<v Speaker 1>for some time. I find it lazy, I find it boring.

0:36:10.527 --> 0:36:13.807
<v Speaker 1>I find it self indulgent, which is ironic given how

0:36:13.887 --> 0:36:17.127
<v Speaker 1>much I write about myself on the internet. It's not

0:36:17.207 --> 0:36:20.967
<v Speaker 1>that I'm not interested in women's opinions or women's experiences

0:36:21.047 --> 0:36:25.287
<v Speaker 1>or women's stories. Hell that's my business quite literally. But

0:36:25.847 --> 0:36:30.047
<v Speaker 1>this whole idea of when you write a letter, it's

0:36:30.207 --> 0:36:32.807
<v Speaker 1>like a letter to my twenty five year old self, like,

0:36:32.967 --> 0:36:35.567
<v Speaker 1>just stop it. I don't know why it annoys me

0:36:35.567 --> 0:36:36.727
<v Speaker 1>a merely does it annoy you?

0:36:36.887 --> 0:36:39.687
<v Speaker 2>Well, you know who would never do this, Martha Stewart,

0:36:39.727 --> 0:36:42.647
<v Speaker 2>because she had it all figured out from the age

0:36:42.647 --> 0:36:43.447
<v Speaker 2>of twenty five.

0:36:43.807 --> 0:36:46.887
<v Speaker 1>I just don't see the relevance I do. So I

0:36:46.887 --> 0:36:49.287
<v Speaker 1>feel like it's like saying I had this dream last

0:36:49.367 --> 0:36:51.687
<v Speaker 1>night and it was a bird, but it wasn't a bird,

0:36:51.727 --> 0:36:54.967
<v Speaker 1>it was actually my English teacher from fourth grade, and like,

0:36:55.087 --> 0:36:55.687
<v Speaker 1>I don't.

0:36:55.487 --> 0:36:57.887
<v Speaker 3>Care, I'm going to defend it. We're obsessed with youth

0:36:58.327 --> 0:37:01.767
<v Speaker 3>and we're always pandering to the young people. And if

0:37:01.807 --> 0:37:06.687
<v Speaker 3>I'm hearing my wisdom from Maya Friedman, who is in

0:37:06.727 --> 0:37:09.247
<v Speaker 3>her fifties, then what I want to know is how

0:37:09.247 --> 0:37:12.207
<v Speaker 3>well your life and your experience is are directly relevant

0:37:12.207 --> 0:37:14.687
<v Speaker 3>to me. And if I'm twenty five, what I would

0:37:14.767 --> 0:37:16.687
<v Speaker 3>like is for you to write a letter to me

0:37:17.287 --> 0:37:19.807
<v Speaker 3>and tell me how to make better decisions. And I

0:37:19.847 --> 0:37:22.447
<v Speaker 3>think that that's what it's about. It's also a very

0:37:22.967 --> 0:37:25.847
<v Speaker 3>low touch form of journalism in that you don't have

0:37:25.887 --> 0:37:28.487
<v Speaker 3>to do any research, you don't have to interview anyone

0:37:28.647 --> 0:37:31.487
<v Speaker 3>except yourself, and it's a very stream of consciousness. It

0:37:31.567 --> 0:37:32.567
<v Speaker 3>might just be your journal.

0:37:32.767 --> 0:37:34.927
<v Speaker 1>My letter would be very short. You're an idiot, but

0:37:35.007 --> 0:37:37.327
<v Speaker 1>you know everyone's an idiot when they're younger, and then

0:37:37.567 --> 0:37:39.807
<v Speaker 1>hopefully you become less of an idiot as you get older.

0:37:40.207 --> 0:37:43.527
<v Speaker 2>Finn me as feedback on feedback to your younger self,

0:37:43.567 --> 0:37:44.407
<v Speaker 2>stop doing.

0:37:44.207 --> 0:37:47.327
<v Speaker 3>It after the break. Dating is a job, not a hobby.

0:37:47.407 --> 0:37:49.407
<v Speaker 3>There is a new way to find love and it

0:37:49.487 --> 0:37:50.767
<v Speaker 3>is not for the fainthearted.

0:38:05.167 --> 0:38:10.847
<v Speaker 2>Loud design to be deleted. That's the tagline of one

0:38:10.847 --> 0:38:13.847
<v Speaker 2>of the most popular dating apps, which also promises to

0:38:13.887 --> 0:38:15.967
<v Speaker 2>be the dating app for people who want to get

0:38:15.967 --> 0:38:19.767
<v Speaker 2>off the dating apps. But a new investigation by the

0:38:19.847 --> 0:38:23.127
<v Speaker 2>UK publication The Observer has found that dating apps are

0:38:23.167 --> 0:38:25.887
<v Speaker 2>becoming more like gambling products. They're more like Poky's. They

0:38:25.927 --> 0:38:28.567
<v Speaker 2>encourage you to buy more and more extras, they get

0:38:28.607 --> 0:38:31.487
<v Speaker 2>you into game like features, and then they lock users

0:38:31.527 --> 0:38:35.607
<v Speaker 2>into what experts have called a perpetual pay to play loop.

0:38:36.567 --> 0:38:39.687
<v Speaker 2>So one woman has the answer to this loop, and

0:38:39.767 --> 0:38:42.407
<v Speaker 2>it starts with accepting that dating is not a game,

0:38:42.687 --> 0:38:46.207
<v Speaker 2>but rather a very serious business. So get out your

0:38:46.207 --> 0:38:48.847
<v Speaker 2>pen and paper take some notes. Her name is Jenny Young.

0:38:49.007 --> 0:38:51.247
<v Speaker 2>She is a fifty six year old professor of English

0:38:51.327 --> 0:38:54.407
<v Speaker 2>in the US, and last year she pioneered something called

0:38:54.447 --> 0:38:58.167
<v Speaker 2>the burned Haystack method. So she was back on the

0:38:58.207 --> 0:39:02.087
<v Speaker 2>dating market in midlife. She watched her daughter unsuccessfully swiping

0:39:02.127 --> 0:39:04.807
<v Speaker 2>through apps. She realized she did not have the energy

0:39:04.887 --> 0:39:07.607
<v Speaker 2>to do the same thing. She googled how to find

0:39:07.607 --> 0:39:10.887
<v Speaker 2>a needle in a haystack, and she realized you have

0:39:10.927 --> 0:39:13.287
<v Speaker 2>to burn the haystack to find the needle. You burn

0:39:13.327 --> 0:39:15.287
<v Speaker 2>the haystack and the needle is left on the ground

0:39:15.367 --> 0:39:18.687
<v Speaker 2>because metal doesn't burn. Okay, so it's a needle, a guy,

0:39:19.007 --> 0:39:22.287
<v Speaker 2>the girl. It's your romantic partner. The needle is your

0:39:22.647 --> 0:39:25.487
<v Speaker 2>love of your life. The basic principle as it applies

0:39:25.527 --> 0:39:27.407
<v Speaker 2>to dating, and by the way, this assumes you want

0:39:27.407 --> 0:39:31.007
<v Speaker 2>a long term monogamous relationship, which not everyone does. Caveat

0:39:31.047 --> 0:39:34.127
<v Speaker 2>there is to filter out time wasters and red flags

0:39:34.207 --> 0:39:36.767
<v Speaker 2>as soon as possible. You need to hard yes or

0:39:36.847 --> 0:39:39.047
<v Speaker 2>hard no anyone who comes into your own box on

0:39:39.047 --> 0:39:41.087
<v Speaker 2>the dating app as soon as possible. It's like Marie

0:39:41.167 --> 0:39:44.367
<v Speaker 2>Kondo for dating. And then you block anyone who's a no.

0:39:44.767 --> 0:39:47.287
<v Speaker 2>Rather than let them keep circulating around or do the

0:39:47.327 --> 0:39:49.567
<v Speaker 2>fade out or the slow burn. Forget it, you just

0:39:49.567 --> 0:39:52.207
<v Speaker 2>got to block them. So here's some examples. You might

0:39:52.287 --> 0:39:54.847
<v Speaker 2>match with someone who lives two hours away who might

0:39:55.007 --> 0:39:57.527
<v Speaker 2>be interested in a long term relationship. You block them.

0:39:58.567 --> 0:40:00.487
<v Speaker 2>The match doesn't want to meet in public, they just

0:40:00.487 --> 0:40:02.727
<v Speaker 2>want to meet it his or her apartment. You block them,

0:40:04.207 --> 0:40:07.847
<v Speaker 2>and the result is that the apps are suddenly working

0:40:08.167 --> 0:40:12.207
<v Speaker 2>for us instead of driving us mad. Is blocking different

0:40:12.407 --> 0:40:15.967
<v Speaker 2>to just not swipe? I haven't been on the apps?

0:40:16.687 --> 0:40:18.927
<v Speaker 2>How does it work? So part of what the apps

0:40:18.927 --> 0:40:21.847
<v Speaker 2>are doing by keeping you there is that no one

0:40:21.887 --> 0:40:24.807
<v Speaker 2>ever actually leaves your universe. You might stop sort of

0:40:24.887 --> 0:40:27.327
<v Speaker 2>dming with someone, but they might then show up again.

0:40:27.527 --> 0:40:30.447
<v Speaker 2>And it's very frustrating to have to keep interacting with

0:40:30.487 --> 0:40:32.287
<v Speaker 2>these people who you've decided you're not interested in.

0:40:32.447 --> 0:40:35.007
<v Speaker 1>So you swipe left or right, whatever it is if

0:40:35.047 --> 0:40:38.047
<v Speaker 1>you're not interested in them, But unless you block them,

0:40:38.087 --> 0:40:41.167
<v Speaker 1>they might be served to you again, like changed your mind? Yes,

0:40:41.287 --> 0:40:43.767
<v Speaker 1>Larry's still got two dogs.

0:40:43.527 --> 0:40:46.847
<v Speaker 2>And likes fishing. Yes. And the thing about Larry is

0:40:47.247 --> 0:40:49.327
<v Speaker 2>that you might be in a conversation with Larry and

0:40:49.367 --> 0:40:51.327
<v Speaker 2>then it might kind of die on the vine, and

0:40:51.367 --> 0:40:54.007
<v Speaker 2>then Larry might come back in two weeks time to

0:40:54.047 --> 0:40:56.687
<v Speaker 2>tell you about his new fishing escapades, and you just

0:40:56.767 --> 0:40:59.287
<v Speaker 2>got to block Larry because you're not interested in him.

0:40:59.847 --> 0:41:02.527
<v Speaker 2>So this was interesting to me, not because I'm on

0:41:02.607 --> 0:41:04.727
<v Speaker 2>the apps, but because.

0:41:04.447 --> 0:41:06.287
<v Speaker 1>Were you when you were single in New York?

0:41:06.327 --> 0:41:08.327
<v Speaker 2>A little bit? A little bit. I'm about to get

0:41:08.367 --> 0:41:11.847
<v Speaker 2>to that. Actually, it's formalizing an approach to finding love

0:41:12.207 --> 0:41:14.047
<v Speaker 2>that is quite familiar to me. I lived in New

0:41:14.127 --> 0:41:16.887
<v Speaker 2>York for eleven years, and New York women have known

0:41:16.967 --> 0:41:19.607
<v Speaker 2>for a long time that if you want a relationship,

0:41:19.767 --> 0:41:22.047
<v Speaker 2>you have to approach looking for it with the same

0:41:22.127 --> 0:41:24.727
<v Speaker 2>single minded ruthlessness that you apply to your career. That

0:41:24.847 --> 0:41:27.727
<v Speaker 2>is a given. So at first this was quite hard

0:41:27.727 --> 0:41:29.167
<v Speaker 2>for me when I lived in New York because I'm

0:41:29.207 --> 0:41:31.047
<v Speaker 2>Australian and you're not meant to show any kind of

0:41:31.127 --> 0:41:33.727
<v Speaker 2>effort or expend any energy on anything. Things are just

0:41:33.807 --> 0:41:34.447
<v Speaker 2>meant to forn.

0:41:34.287 --> 0:41:36.887
<v Speaker 1>Your app We barely want to commit to an actual date.

0:41:36.967 --> 0:41:38.487
<v Speaker 1>It's like, do you want to kind of meet up?

0:41:38.647 --> 0:41:40.527
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to be at the pub this time.

0:41:40.567 --> 0:41:44.247
<v Speaker 2>People's day maybe the word date in Australia until relatively recently.

0:41:44.887 --> 0:41:46.607
<v Speaker 2>And so I remember I used to roll my eyes

0:41:46.647 --> 0:41:48.807
<v Speaker 2>at this one friend of mine because she was a

0:41:48.847 --> 0:41:51.727
<v Speaker 2>real go getter, and she'd schedule drinks with one person,

0:41:51.807 --> 0:41:55.047
<v Speaker 2>dinner with another, post dinner drinks with someone else, and

0:41:55.127 --> 0:41:57.887
<v Speaker 2>she approached it like a job and I rolled my

0:41:57.927 --> 0:41:59.807
<v Speaker 2>eyes at it. And then she found the love of

0:41:59.847 --> 0:42:02.367
<v Speaker 2>her life on a drink s date, and I thought, well,

0:42:02.367 --> 0:42:05.447
<v Speaker 2>maybe she's onto something here. So here's what I did.

0:42:05.727 --> 0:42:08.567
<v Speaker 2>I am an older millennial, so dating apps were around,

0:42:08.647 --> 0:42:10.847
<v Speaker 2>but they were by no means as ubiquitous as they

0:42:10.887 --> 0:42:13.367
<v Speaker 2>are now. So instead, what I did was I asked

0:42:13.527 --> 0:42:17.807
<v Speaker 2>every single person I met to set me up with someone. Everyone.

0:42:18.607 --> 0:42:21.207
<v Speaker 2>This included, no joke, my boss. My boss set me

0:42:21.247 --> 0:42:23.047
<v Speaker 2>up with someone. Didn't go very well, but he did.

0:42:23.487 --> 0:42:25.927
<v Speaker 2>My dentist set me up with someone. Again, didn't go

0:42:26.047 --> 0:42:28.607
<v Speaker 2>very well, but he did. I met an entire table

0:42:28.647 --> 0:42:30.647
<v Speaker 2>of women at a work dinner, never met them before.

0:42:30.807 --> 0:42:33.167
<v Speaker 2>First question was, do any of you know anyone that

0:42:33.207 --> 0:42:36.287
<v Speaker 2>I can date? What do you know? What happened after

0:42:36.327 --> 0:42:38.727
<v Speaker 2>that dinner? One of the random women at that dinner,

0:42:38.727 --> 0:42:40.847
<v Speaker 2>who I'd never met before, told me that she thought

0:42:40.887 --> 0:42:43.647
<v Speaker 2>I'd get along with her brother. And he is the

0:42:43.687 --> 0:42:45.567
<v Speaker 2>person who got the visectomy I mentioned at the start

0:42:45.567 --> 0:42:50.047
<v Speaker 2>of this episode. Oh so my question to the romantic

0:42:51.167 --> 0:42:53.607
<v Speaker 2>that is actually no, it is actually my question to

0:42:53.647 --> 0:42:56.047
<v Speaker 2>the two of you is can the pursuit of love

0:42:56.087 --> 0:42:57.967
<v Speaker 2>be approached like a business deal? And if you are

0:42:58.087 --> 0:43:00.407
<v Speaker 2>uncomfortable right now, tell me why I am.

0:43:00.287 --> 0:43:04.247
<v Speaker 3>Not uncomfortable, because Amelia, I did exactly the same thing.

0:43:04.327 --> 0:43:05.967
<v Speaker 3>I got to the end of my tether and I

0:43:06.007 --> 0:43:08.527
<v Speaker 3>said to my friend. I knew he had handsome friends,

0:43:08.887 --> 0:43:12.167
<v Speaker 3>and I said to him, I see you hanging out

0:43:12.207 --> 0:43:14.327
<v Speaker 3>with all these and some of them must be single.

0:43:14.687 --> 0:43:16.967
<v Speaker 3>I don't know why you're not setting me up. And

0:43:17.007 --> 0:43:19.247
<v Speaker 3>then he ended up setting me up with someone and

0:43:19.287 --> 0:43:22.527
<v Speaker 3>I went to the wrong restaurant and I didn't like him,

0:43:22.807 --> 0:43:25.727
<v Speaker 3>and it all went quite pear shaped, and I was like, Ah,

0:43:25.767 --> 0:43:27.567
<v Speaker 3>this is why you're not setting me up, because I

0:43:27.607 --> 0:43:30.767
<v Speaker 3>have potentially really thrown a spanner in the works of

0:43:30.767 --> 0:43:32.247
<v Speaker 3>your friendship with this person.

0:43:32.767 --> 0:43:35.007
<v Speaker 2>But which is why it's better to ask your dentists.

0:43:35.047 --> 0:43:37.727
<v Speaker 3>By the way, yes, I think acquaintances there's way less

0:43:37.767 --> 0:43:39.567
<v Speaker 3>pressure on it, and then you don't really have to

0:43:39.607 --> 0:43:41.567
<v Speaker 3>debrief with them. It's just like, go on one date,

0:43:41.647 --> 0:43:45.207
<v Speaker 3>see how it happens. My cousin maybe she was early

0:43:45.247 --> 0:43:47.727
<v Speaker 3>thirties and she was single, had just come out of

0:43:47.727 --> 0:43:50.247
<v Speaker 3>a long term relationship, and I said, I work with

0:43:50.287 --> 0:43:52.887
<v Speaker 3>this guy at the golf club. He's quite nice, don't

0:43:52.927 --> 0:43:54.847
<v Speaker 3>know him that well. Go on a date. Three kids

0:43:55.047 --> 0:43:58.287
<v Speaker 3>engaged now, So I have done this before for my friends.

0:43:58.287 --> 0:43:59.927
<v Speaker 3>I think it's great wingman behavior.

0:44:00.127 --> 0:44:03.167
<v Speaker 1>I have never set anyone up successfully hasn't occurred to me.

0:44:03.247 --> 0:44:07.167
<v Speaker 3>Really, my worry with this thing about going on dating

0:44:07.167 --> 0:44:11.207
<v Speaker 3>apps and being very quick in our filtering is that

0:44:11.287 --> 0:44:14.647
<v Speaker 3>I think how filtering methods are flawed. And this is

0:44:14.727 --> 0:44:18.127
<v Speaker 3>why Dolly Alderton said this the other night at her show,

0:44:18.207 --> 0:44:20.647
<v Speaker 3>and it is exactly what I think about dating, which

0:44:20.687 --> 0:44:22.967
<v Speaker 3>is that the biggest lesson you can learn is not

0:44:23.087 --> 0:44:26.327
<v Speaker 3>to have a type. And the issue with going on

0:44:26.367 --> 0:44:30.087
<v Speaker 3>your apps is that I found there was an inverse

0:44:30.167 --> 0:44:33.727
<v Speaker 3>relationship between the men who had a great opening line

0:44:33.927 --> 0:44:37.127
<v Speaker 3>or great chat on apps and being a good date,

0:44:37.447 --> 0:44:40.607
<v Speaker 3>like they were completely different. I was going for the

0:44:40.687 --> 0:44:44.167
<v Speaker 3>same man because as an Australian woman who thought I

0:44:44.287 --> 0:44:47.087
<v Speaker 3>was meant to sit back and just wait or whatever,

0:44:47.527 --> 0:44:49.407
<v Speaker 3>I just kept dating the same guy who was the

0:44:49.487 --> 0:44:52.927
<v Speaker 3>type of guy to make a move, whereas the guy

0:44:52.967 --> 0:44:54.967
<v Speaker 3>I should have ended up with was a guy who

0:44:55.007 --> 0:44:57.407
<v Speaker 3>doesn't make a move. Dating apps, to me, I just

0:44:57.487 --> 0:45:02.167
<v Speaker 3>feel incredibly nihilistic about all of them. I was reading

0:45:02.167 --> 0:45:05.727
<v Speaker 3>that there's a class action suit against some of the apps,

0:45:05.807 --> 0:45:09.007
<v Speaker 3>which you know. The claim is that they are working

0:45:09.487 --> 0:45:12.967
<v Speaker 3>to keep you on the app and not necessarily serving

0:45:13.007 --> 0:45:15.967
<v Speaker 3>you your best matches, because then you'll leave them when

0:45:16.007 --> 0:45:18.967
<v Speaker 3>you are on it. It feels like gambling more than anything,

0:45:19.047 --> 0:45:22.567
<v Speaker 3>Like you are playing a slot machine and you're actually

0:45:22.607 --> 0:45:25.287
<v Speaker 3>not being served. This is a theory. You're not being

0:45:25.327 --> 0:45:27.687
<v Speaker 3>served your best matches because then they might lose you.

0:45:28.367 --> 0:45:31.727
<v Speaker 3>I'm all for your strategy, Amelia, which is go on

0:45:31.807 --> 0:45:35.447
<v Speaker 3>a date and go with unlikely people rather than thinking

0:45:35.447 --> 0:45:38.687
<v Speaker 3>you're filtering method, because my filtering method was broken.

0:45:39.007 --> 0:45:40.727
<v Speaker 1>I want to come back to the part where you said,

0:45:40.727 --> 0:45:45.087
<v Speaker 1>does this make you uncomfortable? And it does only because

0:45:45.447 --> 0:45:48.887
<v Speaker 1>I've internalized this belief that, like everything else women do,

0:45:49.487 --> 0:45:53.647
<v Speaker 1>finding a partner should be effortless. It should just happen.

0:45:54.247 --> 0:45:57.647
<v Speaker 1>It's like I woke up looking beautiful. I just bumped

0:45:57.647 --> 0:46:00.247
<v Speaker 1>into him, like we cut, you know, met eyes across

0:46:00.247 --> 0:46:02.927
<v Speaker 1>a crowded room. So I think at the beginning, there

0:46:02.967 --> 0:46:06.207
<v Speaker 1>was so much stigma around dating apps, dating websites, as

0:46:06.207 --> 0:46:08.887
<v Speaker 1>it used to be with RSVP, because it was like, oh,

0:46:08.887 --> 0:46:13.407
<v Speaker 1>you're trying so hard, yes, and it's so strange, Like

0:46:13.487 --> 0:46:17.447
<v Speaker 1>we accept that people have to try to have nice

0:46:17.487 --> 0:46:19.727
<v Speaker 1>hair and they have to try, well, maybe not with

0:46:19.767 --> 0:46:21.487
<v Speaker 1>beauty standards, but they have to try at work.

0:46:21.567 --> 0:46:21.767
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:46:21.927 --> 0:46:23.767
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to think if there's anywhere else that we

0:46:24.007 --> 0:46:28.127
<v Speaker 1>accept that people need to try. Everything else just has

0:46:28.207 --> 0:46:30.727
<v Speaker 1>to be effortless, which means that it's of course, it's

0:46:30.807 --> 0:46:33.927
<v Speaker 1>not effortless. Whether it is your hair or your skin,

0:46:34.287 --> 0:46:38.127
<v Speaker 1>or your relationship or meeting someone or your friendships. None

0:46:38.127 --> 0:46:41.327
<v Speaker 1>of it's effortless. And so not only do we have

0:46:41.407 --> 0:46:43.167
<v Speaker 1>to put in the work, but then we also have

0:46:43.247 --> 0:46:44.847
<v Speaker 1>to make it seem like we're not working.

0:46:45.287 --> 0:46:48.287
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Jenny Young has thoughts on this too. One of

0:46:48.287 --> 0:46:50.727
<v Speaker 2>the things that she says, and remember how every generation

0:46:50.927 --> 0:46:53.807
<v Speaker 2>has these kinds of dating orthodox is so they used

0:46:54.087 --> 0:46:55.527
<v Speaker 2>he has to have his cab light on. In the

0:46:55.607 --> 0:46:57.447
<v Speaker 2>nine Sex in the City, Sex and the City, this

0:46:57.567 --> 0:47:00.367
<v Speaker 2>idea that men will only get into a relationship once

0:47:00.407 --> 0:47:03.327
<v Speaker 2>they're ready to have their cab light on. The nineties

0:47:03.367 --> 0:47:06.967
<v Speaker 2>were very heteronormative. It was always men's cab lights, I think. Yeah.

0:47:07.047 --> 0:47:09.087
<v Speaker 2>Then in the two thousands there was he's just not

0:47:09.127 --> 0:47:11.847
<v Speaker 2>that into you also from Sex and City actually, and

0:47:11.887 --> 0:47:14.607
<v Speaker 2>the idea of that was don't read between the lines

0:47:14.647 --> 0:47:17.927
<v Speaker 2>too much. If he's not returning your calls or he

0:47:17.967 --> 0:47:20.287
<v Speaker 2>doesn't seem very eager to meet up, that's because he

0:47:20.327 --> 0:47:21.247
<v Speaker 2>doesn't really like you.

0:47:21.447 --> 0:47:23.727
<v Speaker 1>I think that was very freeing. I think that was

0:47:23.767 --> 0:47:26.567
<v Speaker 1>actually a really helpful thing, even though it seems a

0:47:26.567 --> 0:47:29.967
<v Speaker 1>bit mean. I think that that gave us, you know,

0:47:29.967 --> 0:47:32.287
<v Speaker 1>a framework for not kidding ourselves.

0:47:32.327 --> 0:47:35.887
<v Speaker 3>But it was the New yorkerfication of dating, which was

0:47:36.007 --> 0:47:41.047
<v Speaker 3>that you need to divorce yourself from the emotions of dating.

0:47:41.087 --> 0:47:44.407
<v Speaker 2>But you do, Jesse, I think you do. And I

0:47:44.447 --> 0:47:49.367
<v Speaker 2>think this latest method the burned Haystack. She's coming from

0:47:49.367 --> 0:47:52.287
<v Speaker 2>a background of reading books through a living and figuring

0:47:52.367 --> 0:47:55.367
<v Speaker 2>out what words mean, and she's saying, if the words

0:47:55.407 --> 0:47:58.407
<v Speaker 2>someone is sending to you are unappealing or don't seem

0:47:58.447 --> 0:48:01.247
<v Speaker 2>particularly excited, it's actually a new version of just he's

0:48:01.247 --> 0:48:03.487
<v Speaker 2>just not that into you. Cut him loose. There's no

0:48:03.647 --> 0:48:06.607
<v Speaker 2>point continuing to read the subtext. I'm sure we've all

0:48:06.647 --> 0:48:08.807
<v Speaker 2>been there, reading a text from a love interest and

0:48:08.807 --> 0:48:11.927
<v Speaker 2>figuring out if talk to you later actually means I

0:48:11.967 --> 0:48:14.767
<v Speaker 2>want to have a phasectomy eventually with you. And so

0:48:15.047 --> 0:48:17.367
<v Speaker 2>I think that it is very freeing for women, in

0:48:17.407 --> 0:48:22.367
<v Speaker 2>particular to think my feelings. I'm always worried about being hurt,

0:48:22.367 --> 0:48:25.047
<v Speaker 2>but women also worry about hurting men. This is obviously

0:48:25.327 --> 0:48:28.647
<v Speaker 2>in street relationships, and this is saying don't worry about

0:48:28.727 --> 0:48:30.007
<v Speaker 2>hurting them, They're fine.

0:48:30.087 --> 0:48:33.207
<v Speaker 3>I was speaking to a friend recently about how we'd

0:48:33.247 --> 0:48:37.007
<v Speaker 3>had experiences in our early to mid twenties. Say a

0:48:37.047 --> 0:48:40.247
<v Speaker 3>bad relationship, a bad date, say you were ghosted, that

0:48:40.447 --> 0:48:43.007
<v Speaker 3>throws you off kilter, and then what happens is you

0:48:43.047 --> 0:48:46.247
<v Speaker 3>have a series of either dates or situationships or relationships

0:48:47.007 --> 0:48:50.687
<v Speaker 3>that looking back, you sort of sabotaged. Like you can

0:48:50.727 --> 0:48:52.927
<v Speaker 3>be thrown off kilter by one experience and then you

0:48:53.007 --> 0:48:56.207
<v Speaker 3>can't get your groove back. So it's like, to me,

0:48:56.447 --> 0:48:59.927
<v Speaker 3>dating felt like I was on a sporting field and

0:49:00.287 --> 0:49:02.447
<v Speaker 3>I sprained my ankle and I tried to come off,

0:49:02.487 --> 0:49:05.087
<v Speaker 3>and it was like get back on, and then I

0:49:05.127 --> 0:49:07.367
<v Speaker 3>broke my arm, and then it was like go back on,

0:49:07.807 --> 0:49:09.847
<v Speaker 3>and then I had all these ines and I was

0:49:09.887 --> 0:49:11.847
<v Speaker 3>like do you love me? And they were like no,

0:49:12.087 --> 0:49:14.727
<v Speaker 3>You're a total mess. Like I felt. For me, I

0:49:14.847 --> 0:49:16.527
<v Speaker 3>probably needed to.

0:49:16.567 --> 0:49:18.167
<v Speaker 2>Just sit You need it to be benched.

0:49:18.207 --> 0:49:20.447
<v Speaker 3>I needed to be benched for a prolonged period of

0:49:20.447 --> 0:49:23.847
<v Speaker 3>time and then just sit next to Luca at work

0:49:24.167 --> 0:49:27.247
<v Speaker 3>and go from there. But I was not match fit

0:49:27.687 --> 0:49:32.407
<v Speaker 3>and throwing myself out and out again with multiple injuries.

0:49:32.927 --> 0:49:35.127
<v Speaker 3>Was not good for anyone, I think.

0:49:35.167 --> 0:49:37.407
<v Speaker 1>Thank you to all of the out louders for listening

0:49:37.407 --> 0:49:39.927
<v Speaker 1>to today's show if you still are, and also to

0:49:39.967 --> 0:49:42.447
<v Speaker 1>our fabulous team for helping us put this show back

0:49:42.487 --> 0:49:45.807
<v Speaker 1>together after breaking it as I did at the start

0:49:45.847 --> 0:49:47.567
<v Speaker 1>of the show when I didn't know how to even

0:49:47.567 --> 0:49:51.887
<v Speaker 1>say hello. I'm ending it strongly as I started by

0:49:51.887 --> 0:49:54.367
<v Speaker 1>making a fool of myself. Let me tell you what

0:49:54.447 --> 0:49:56.447
<v Speaker 1>I should have told my twenty five year old self.

0:49:56.447 --> 0:49:58.687
<v Speaker 1>Pull up a chair. We will be back in your

0:49:58.687 --> 0:50:03.447
<v Speaker 1>ears tomorrow. Thank you Amelia for sitting next to me, and.

0:50:03.687 --> 0:50:07.567
<v Speaker 3>Bye, out Louders. If you ever wondered what Mayor Friedman

0:50:07.647 --> 0:50:09.847
<v Speaker 3>is like as a mother in law, and you might

0:50:09.887 --> 0:50:15.007
<v Speaker 3>want to listen to yesterday's subscriber episode. Actually, before we go, Amelia,

0:50:15.207 --> 0:50:17.807
<v Speaker 3>how would you feel if your mother in law came

0:50:17.847 --> 0:50:21.607
<v Speaker 3>to your house, went through your children's clothes, threw out

0:50:21.847 --> 0:50:25.207
<v Speaker 3>bags of their clothes and rearranged them just hypothetically. How

0:50:25.247 --> 0:50:26.247
<v Speaker 3>would that make you feel?

0:50:27.487 --> 0:50:30.127
<v Speaker 2>Are you asking for a friend, Jesse, Yeah yeah, yeah,

0:50:29.927 --> 0:50:32.407
<v Speaker 2>yeah yeah right? Is the friend's mother in law the

0:50:32.447 --> 0:50:34.647
<v Speaker 2>same mother in law who again told me last week

0:50:34.687 --> 0:50:35.807
<v Speaker 2>that my shirt was terrible.

0:50:36.007 --> 0:50:38.287
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yep, she's a nightmare to be that.

0:50:38.487 --> 0:50:42.807
<v Speaker 1>So we've got time for on the show today.

0:50:43.207 --> 0:50:45.607
<v Speaker 3>Here is a taste Mia.

0:50:45.727 --> 0:50:50.007
<v Speaker 8>You have gone into Jesse's home, yeah, and rearranged him

0:50:50.367 --> 0:50:53.967
<v Speaker 8>when I was there, when Jesse was buried with you

0:50:54.087 --> 0:50:59.847
<v Speaker 8>not home, and you rearranged her daughter's wardrobe and decided

0:50:59.927 --> 0:51:02.487
<v Speaker 8>which clothes should go and which should stay.

0:51:03.087 --> 0:51:05.047
<v Speaker 1>And that's what you did without being asked.

0:51:05.447 --> 0:51:06.167
<v Speaker 2>Am I correct?

0:51:06.327 --> 0:51:06.727
<v Speaker 1>Twice?

0:51:07.327 --> 0:51:11.407
<v Speaker 2>I would be really annoyed.

0:51:12.367 --> 0:51:14.607
<v Speaker 3>As always, will pop a link in the show notes

0:51:15.087 --> 0:51:17.607
<v Speaker 3>shout out to any Mum and me A subscribers listening.

0:51:17.847 --> 0:51:20.007
<v Speaker 3>If you love the show and you want to support us,

0:51:20.247 --> 0:51:23.047
<v Speaker 3>subscribing to Mom and Mia is the very best way

0:51:23.087 --> 0:51:25.647
<v Speaker 3>to do so. There's a link in the episode description