WEBVTT - Get My Boss Out Of My Bed & The Last Relationship Taboo

0:00:08.193 --> 0:00:10.914
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to a MoMA Mia podcast.

0:00:16.154 --> 0:00:18.994
<v Speaker 2>Hello, and welcome to MoMA Mia out Loud. It's what

0:00:19.034 --> 0:00:22.913
<v Speaker 2>women are actually talking about on Monday, the seventeenth of November.

0:00:22.954 --> 0:00:24.554
<v Speaker 2>My name is Hollywayne Night.

0:00:24.914 --> 0:00:26.514
<v Speaker 1>My name is Amelia Laster.

0:00:26.834 --> 0:00:30.114
<v Speaker 3>My name is Claire Stein, not Jesse Steve.

0:00:30.794 --> 0:00:33.554
<v Speaker 2>So Claire Stephens is filling in for Jesse a couple

0:00:33.594 --> 0:00:37.034
<v Speaker 2>of times this week, and regular out louders will know

0:00:37.513 --> 0:00:39.273
<v Speaker 2>that Claire has been on the show many times. She

0:00:39.394 --> 0:00:41.953
<v Speaker 2>filled in for one Jesse Stevens on her Matt leave

0:00:42.153 --> 0:00:44.993
<v Speaker 2>last time. What's been going on since the out Louder's

0:00:45.434 --> 0:00:48.074
<v Speaker 2>hung out with you last Claire, just a few little things.

0:00:48.114 --> 0:00:49.594
<v Speaker 3>I've been listening to a lot of out Loud.

0:00:49.634 --> 0:00:50.514
<v Speaker 2>I'll have feedback.

0:00:50.593 --> 0:00:52.633
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I listened to every episode, so I feel like

0:00:52.674 --> 0:00:55.354
<v Speaker 3>I've been in the studio with you guys. I'm overly

0:00:55.434 --> 0:00:58.834
<v Speaker 3>familiar with Amelia, Like I'm like my friend Amelia, and

0:00:58.874 --> 0:01:04.754
<v Speaker 3>Amelia is like hi, like twice as beautiful winged eyeliner

0:01:04.994 --> 0:01:05.674
<v Speaker 3>thank you.

0:01:05.794 --> 0:01:08.274
<v Speaker 2>Which is a top reminder everybody to go on watch

0:01:08.314 --> 0:01:10.554
<v Speaker 2>just on YouTube. Yeah, if you want to see the

0:01:11.274 --> 0:01:13.673
<v Speaker 2>amazing wings and see if you can tell the difference

0:01:13.674 --> 0:01:15.514
<v Speaker 2>between Jesse and Claire, which of course you can if

0:01:15.514 --> 0:01:15.914
<v Speaker 2>you know them.

0:01:15.914 --> 0:01:19.474
<v Speaker 3>Well, yes, but I've just been freelancing, working for myself.

0:01:19.514 --> 0:01:23.274
<v Speaker 3>Sometimes I pretend I'm a CEO of my own business,

0:01:23.354 --> 0:01:26.034
<v Speaker 3>but my business is me and my staff are terrible

0:01:26.154 --> 0:01:27.674
<v Speaker 3>and it's hard to keep them in line.

0:01:28.114 --> 0:01:30.194
<v Speaker 2>I I got lots of people who are calling themselves

0:01:30.194 --> 0:01:31.274
<v Speaker 2>founders and just doing that.

0:01:31.594 --> 0:01:35.634
<v Speaker 3>It's like I'm the CEO of my personal Instagram account

0:01:36.034 --> 0:01:39.554
<v Speaker 3>and my personal substat and yeah, it's probably time for

0:01:39.554 --> 0:01:40.754
<v Speaker 3>performance reviews.

0:01:42.074 --> 0:01:44.554
<v Speaker 1>Claire, do you do anything to get in the Jesse

0:01:44.794 --> 0:01:49.354
<v Speaker 1>mode before you come on in Jesse's chair? Any Jesse

0:01:49.634 --> 0:01:51.874
<v Speaker 1>related rituals so you go through.

0:01:52.074 --> 0:01:53.954
<v Speaker 3>I did chat to her last night and I was like,

0:01:53.994 --> 0:01:56.154
<v Speaker 3>what are you What are you thinking about at the moment?

0:01:56.194 --> 0:01:58.714
<v Speaker 3>You've seen anything interesting over the weekend. I know what

0:01:58.714 --> 0:02:00.234
<v Speaker 3>you're trying to do. You're trying to get me to

0:02:00.274 --> 0:02:02.474
<v Speaker 3>pitch for your episode about Loud and I'm like that

0:02:02.714 --> 0:02:03.594
<v Speaker 3>would be correct.

0:02:04.154 --> 0:02:06.594
<v Speaker 2>Well, welcome, it's very good to have you here.

0:02:07.274 --> 0:02:07.634
<v Speaker 3>Thank you.

0:02:08.474 --> 0:02:11.554
<v Speaker 2>Here's what's made our agenda for today. I have a

0:02:11.594 --> 0:02:13.994
<v Speaker 2>theory backed up by an article I'm going to tell

0:02:13.994 --> 0:02:15.834
<v Speaker 2>you about later, that it's only a matter of time

0:02:15.954 --> 0:02:18.514
<v Speaker 2>before at brunch or lunch or whatever, we're sitting across

0:02:18.514 --> 0:02:20.674
<v Speaker 2>from a friend. They're going to be opening up about

0:02:20.714 --> 0:02:23.154
<v Speaker 2>their new partner and how much they love them. And

0:02:23.194 --> 0:02:25.354
<v Speaker 2>we're going to find out it's not a person at all.

0:02:25.954 --> 0:02:28.514
<v Speaker 2>We're going to discuss ai companions.

0:02:28.754 --> 0:02:30.274
<v Speaker 1>So we all have to learn to put on a

0:02:30.314 --> 0:02:34.194
<v Speaker 1>face it is supporting the poker face like that's so great.

0:02:34.354 --> 0:02:36.634
<v Speaker 2>Maybe we will. I mean, anyway, we're going to get

0:02:36.634 --> 0:02:36.954
<v Speaker 2>into that.

0:02:37.594 --> 0:02:42.154
<v Speaker 1>Plus is having and a fair a fiable offense, at

0:02:42.234 --> 0:02:44.714
<v Speaker 1>least one CEO thinks so. And I'm going to puff

0:02:44.714 --> 0:02:45.394
<v Speaker 1>a fish about it.

0:02:46.114 --> 0:02:50.114
<v Speaker 3>And a whole lot of Epstein emails have been released,

0:02:50.394 --> 0:02:53.474
<v Speaker 3>and I have questions specifically familiar Lester.

0:02:54.994 --> 0:02:57.794
<v Speaker 2>But first, as if we could kick off today without

0:02:57.834 --> 0:03:01.114
<v Speaker 2>talking about our favorite couple, Justin Trudeau and Katie Perry,

0:03:01.234 --> 0:03:05.594
<v Speaker 2>or rather we're talking adjacent to them, right, So Justin Trudeau,

0:03:05.754 --> 0:03:09.154
<v Speaker 2>who you all know, is this worthy former president, president,

0:03:09.194 --> 0:03:12.314
<v Speaker 2>prime minister, a Prime minister of Canada. Meili's looking at

0:03:12.354 --> 0:03:15.954
<v Speaker 2>me like God, this is going well. He was married

0:03:16.154 --> 0:03:20.274
<v Speaker 2>to Sophie greg Wa for eighteen years and they broke

0:03:20.354 --> 0:03:22.633
<v Speaker 2>up a little while ago, and as we know, he's

0:03:22.674 --> 0:03:25.874
<v Speaker 2>now dating Katie Perry. She was on a podcast this

0:03:25.994 --> 0:03:30.554
<v Speaker 2>week they marvelously named Arlene Is Alone The Single Life

0:03:31.034 --> 0:03:32.354
<v Speaker 2>that struck me as such.

0:03:32.194 --> 0:03:35.354
<v Speaker 1>A Canadian name. I don't know why, but Arlene.

0:03:36.754 --> 0:03:39.394
<v Speaker 2>It's hosted by a woman called Arlene Dickinson. She's a

0:03:39.394 --> 0:03:43.674
<v Speaker 2>Canadian businesswoman there and you know, personality and this show

0:03:43.714 --> 0:03:46.634
<v Speaker 2>is all about post divorce life and so big booking.

0:03:46.794 --> 0:03:51.194
<v Speaker 2>Great booking got Sophie Trudeau on and Arlene warmed up

0:03:51.234 --> 0:03:52.954
<v Speaker 2>to it for twenty minutes and then she couldn't help

0:03:52.994 --> 0:03:57.714
<v Speaker 2>it and she said, Hey, the room. Your ex husband

0:03:57.754 --> 0:04:00.514
<v Speaker 2>appears to be dating a popstar and he's not being

0:04:00.594 --> 0:04:03.634
<v Speaker 2>very private about it. How are you handling it's.

0:04:03.274 --> 0:04:04.634
<v Speaker 1>Not a pop star and astronaut?

0:04:04.874 --> 0:04:10.674
<v Speaker 2>Sorry, shit, today it's Monday for hear me. Your ex

0:04:10.754 --> 0:04:14.874
<v Speaker 2>husband is dating astronaut Katie Perry. How are we failing

0:04:14.914 --> 0:04:17.474
<v Speaker 2>about it? And this is what Sophie Trudeau said.

0:04:17.514 --> 0:04:19.354
<v Speaker 4>Sophie, if you don't want to talk about it, that's cool.

0:04:19.394 --> 0:04:21.874
<v Speaker 4>But I do think about you. I think about the

0:04:22.594 --> 0:04:27.553
<v Speaker 4>public the publicity and the publicness of what Justin is

0:04:27.594 --> 0:04:29.753
<v Speaker 4>doing for example right now, right like you know, like

0:04:29.873 --> 0:04:32.794
<v Speaker 4>that's public and that's God. I don't know how you

0:04:32.834 --> 0:04:35.313
<v Speaker 4>stay cool, Like, I just don't know how you stay cool,

0:04:35.354 --> 0:04:39.234
<v Speaker 4>and I really admire it because I would probably not

0:04:39.354 --> 0:04:41.314
<v Speaker 4>be that way, you know, you.

0:04:41.274 --> 0:04:47.193
<v Speaker 5>Know, or human beings and stuff affects us normal. How

0:04:47.274 --> 0:04:52.873
<v Speaker 5>you react to stuff is your decision. So I choose

0:04:53.034 --> 0:04:54.674
<v Speaker 5>to try.

0:04:54.474 --> 0:04:56.234
<v Speaker 1>To listen to the music instead of the noise.

0:04:57.234 --> 0:05:00.113
<v Speaker 5>I'm very aware that a lot of public stuff out

0:05:00.154 --> 0:05:01.474
<v Speaker 5>there can be triggers.

0:05:02.154 --> 0:05:02.793
<v Speaker 1>We're humans.

0:05:03.993 --> 0:05:05.394
<v Speaker 5>What I do with it is my.

0:05:05.513 --> 0:05:08.954
<v Speaker 2>Decision, listening to the music and not the noise. I

0:05:08.993 --> 0:05:10.154
<v Speaker 2>think she's a zen master.

0:05:10.274 --> 0:05:11.674
<v Speaker 1>What do we think, Well, as long as it's not

0:05:11.753 --> 0:05:14.833
<v Speaker 1>teenage dream, we're not listening to that music in the

0:05:14.953 --> 0:05:18.113
<v Speaker 1>Greg wa Trudeau household right now. Look, I just think

0:05:18.193 --> 0:05:21.234
<v Speaker 1>Sophie's a very zen person. That's true. She is a

0:05:21.234 --> 0:05:24.514
<v Speaker 1>certified yoga instructor. And I don't know if you remember this,

0:05:24.834 --> 0:05:27.594
<v Speaker 1>but a few years ago she was at an event

0:05:27.794 --> 0:05:32.633
<v Speaker 1>in Canada in her capacity as First Lady of Canada. Well,

0:05:32.633 --> 0:05:34.834
<v Speaker 1>what happened was she just decided that she was going

0:05:34.834 --> 0:05:36.833
<v Speaker 1>to sing a song that she created.

0:05:36.633 --> 0:05:39.113
<v Speaker 5>And it's called Smile Back at Me, and it goes

0:05:39.154 --> 0:05:48.433
<v Speaker 5>like this, Some people did the angels can fly, and

0:05:48.513 --> 0:05:50.194
<v Speaker 5>some people fight.

0:05:52.393 --> 0:05:53.313
<v Speaker 2>Without knowing.

0:05:55.513 --> 0:06:00.553
<v Speaker 1>Some people say she can't sing some people, but I

0:06:00.553 --> 0:06:02.873
<v Speaker 1>guess he's got a type. He loves a SHANTUZI does

0:06:02.873 --> 0:06:03.474
<v Speaker 1>old Justin.

0:06:05.553 --> 0:06:11.393
<v Speaker 3>Later in that original clip, Sophie says, Arlin is alone. Ah, yes, yes,

0:06:11.714 --> 0:06:15.873
<v Speaker 3>Arlene's podcast. Sophie, she's being her very zen self about

0:06:15.914 --> 0:06:18.314
<v Speaker 3>how you react to your decision, and she says, you.

0:06:18.234 --> 0:06:20.393
<v Speaker 1>Know, do I laugh? Do I cry?

0:06:20.513 --> 0:06:22.914
<v Speaker 3>Do I have all these emotions? And I liked the

0:06:22.914 --> 0:06:26.033
<v Speaker 3>word laugh because I was like, that is just we

0:06:26.113 --> 0:06:29.274
<v Speaker 3>needed a sprinkle of pettiness, because this was too evolved

0:06:29.474 --> 0:06:32.274
<v Speaker 3>for me, like, we come on, come on, your ex

0:06:32.354 --> 0:06:35.394
<v Speaker 3>husband is dating Katy Perry. I need to know that

0:06:35.474 --> 0:06:39.433
<v Speaker 3>there is some kind of lolls. And the laugh for

0:06:39.553 --> 0:06:41.874
<v Speaker 3>me said, I do laugh about it.

0:06:42.234 --> 0:06:44.914
<v Speaker 1>I just send Megan in the group chat because of

0:06:44.953 --> 0:06:47.953
<v Speaker 1>her best friend relationship with Megan. I bet they're sending

0:06:47.993 --> 0:06:50.034
<v Speaker 1>some memes about Katie that are not very nice. Yeah.

0:06:50.073 --> 0:06:53.993
<v Speaker 2>This whole leans into my scoreless gossip side is Harry

0:06:54.034 --> 0:06:56.473
<v Speaker 2>and Megan live really close to where Orlando and Katie

0:06:56.553 --> 0:06:58.594
<v Speaker 2>used to live. Their neighbors needs to tip each other

0:06:58.633 --> 0:07:01.954
<v Speaker 2>off about the paparazzi. So you are right, Megan and

0:07:01.993 --> 0:07:04.433
<v Speaker 2>Sophie are like having a laugh about Katie, but then

0:07:04.674 --> 0:07:08.393
<v Speaker 2>when she bumps into her a Walmart with the very

0:07:08.433 --> 0:07:12.314
<v Speaker 2>fancy people shop not there, she also goes, Gosh, you're

0:07:12.354 --> 0:07:14.154
<v Speaker 2>a much better singer than Sophie Trudeau.

0:07:17.194 --> 0:07:21.394
<v Speaker 3>All I've seen this weekend are headlines about the newly

0:07:21.474 --> 0:07:25.913
<v Speaker 3>released emails from the Epstein files and what they say

0:07:26.154 --> 0:07:30.874
<v Speaker 3>about President Donald Trump. So I've just seen all this

0:07:30.994 --> 0:07:35.834
<v Speaker 3>stuff about how the Democrats released a batch of emails

0:07:35.914 --> 0:07:39.114
<v Speaker 3>and then the Republicans were like, no, that gave a

0:07:39.194 --> 0:07:42.194
<v Speaker 3>biased idea of Trump. So we're gonna release twenty thousand

0:07:42.274 --> 0:07:46.194
<v Speaker 3>pages of files, and I'm trying to weed through them

0:07:46.234 --> 0:07:50.154
<v Speaker 3>and see if there's any smoking gun here. There's been

0:07:50.194 --> 0:07:54.713
<v Speaker 3>memes about how Trump gave Bill Clinton a blow job.

0:07:55.274 --> 0:07:58.634
<v Speaker 3>There's been damning headlines about Trump knowing about the girls,

0:07:59.234 --> 0:08:02.234
<v Speaker 3>stuff about how Trump was like the worst person Epstein

0:08:02.314 --> 0:08:05.074
<v Speaker 3>had ever known. I don't know if coming from a

0:08:05.154 --> 0:08:08.434
<v Speaker 3>convicted sex offender, like that's a good thing or a

0:08:08.474 --> 0:08:11.874
<v Speaker 3>bad thing. Yeah, and I've seen tiktoks about the appalling

0:08:11.874 --> 0:08:15.474
<v Speaker 3>boomer grammar in the emails, which seems like a side note, Amelia,

0:08:15.554 --> 0:08:18.514
<v Speaker 3>I need to know about the Bill Clinton blowjob. I'm

0:08:18.554 --> 0:08:22.874
<v Speaker 3>so confused because I don't speak like Epstein nickname shortcut.

0:08:23.154 --> 0:08:25.354
<v Speaker 1>This is weird. There's a lot of weird stuff in here.

0:08:25.874 --> 0:08:29.154
<v Speaker 1>There isn't any smoking gun saying that Trump was complicit

0:08:29.154 --> 0:08:32.034
<v Speaker 1>in Epstein's crimes, but there is a lot of weird

0:08:32.034 --> 0:08:35.034
<v Speaker 1>stuff to talk about, and this Bill Clinton is one

0:08:35.034 --> 0:08:38.994
<v Speaker 1>of the strangest. So there's an email that Jeffrey's brother

0:08:39.074 --> 0:08:42.794
<v Speaker 1>Mark sent him in March twenty eighteen where it's very

0:08:42.874 --> 0:08:45.194
<v Speaker 1>brotherly of him. Actually, he checks in on his health.

0:08:45.234 --> 0:08:47.514
<v Speaker 1>He says, a while back you mentioned you're pre diabetic.

0:08:47.634 --> 0:08:50.834
<v Speaker 1>Has anything changed with that? Which is quite nice brother

0:08:50.914 --> 0:08:53.554
<v Speaker 1>to brother. But then the exchange continues in a bit

0:08:53.554 --> 0:08:56.114
<v Speaker 1>of an odd way. Jeff reassures him that he's got

0:08:56.114 --> 0:08:59.674
<v Speaker 1>his pre diabetes under control. But then Mark asks if

0:08:59.674 --> 0:09:04.074
<v Speaker 1>Putin has the photos of Trump blowing Buba. So Baba

0:09:04.274 --> 0:09:07.074
<v Speaker 1>is a nickname for Bill Clinton. Putin is the Russian

0:09:06.994 --> 0:09:09.874
<v Speaker 1>president and not a very nice man. We don't really

0:09:09.954 --> 0:09:10.754
<v Speaker 1>know what this means.

0:09:11.034 --> 0:09:14.514
<v Speaker 2>Here's what I don't understand, Amelia. None of this is new, really,

0:09:14.594 --> 0:09:17.034
<v Speaker 2>like the emails being dripped, aren't you. But we've just

0:09:17.074 --> 0:09:20.394
<v Speaker 2>seen this whole scandal bringing down a member of the

0:09:20.474 --> 0:09:23.194
<v Speaker 2>royal family. It's been bubbling away for years and years

0:09:23.274 --> 0:09:26.914
<v Speaker 2>and years. The FBI have been were across Epstein for

0:09:27.114 --> 0:09:31.034
<v Speaker 2>nearly two decades now. If you read extracts from Virginia

0:09:31.114 --> 0:09:34.914
<v Speaker 2>Guphrase posthumous book, it's clear that anyone in that circle

0:09:35.074 --> 0:09:37.474
<v Speaker 2>knew about the girls because they were all going to

0:09:37.554 --> 0:09:40.074
<v Speaker 2>these parties in there, and she talks in there about

0:09:40.114 --> 0:09:42.994
<v Speaker 2>famous academics and professors in this and that there's a

0:09:42.994 --> 0:09:46.194
<v Speaker 2>lot of people involved in this scenario. Why is it

0:09:46.474 --> 0:09:52.074
<v Speaker 2>so sort of tortuously slowly dropping out and will we

0:09:52.154 --> 0:09:54.794
<v Speaker 2>find out? Won't we find out? People just going release

0:09:54.834 --> 0:09:57.114
<v Speaker 2>the files every five and it's like, why is it

0:09:57.154 --> 0:09:58.074
<v Speaker 2>all taking so long?

0:09:58.274 --> 0:10:00.754
<v Speaker 1>It's a really good question, Holly, and I have a

0:10:00.794 --> 0:10:04.314
<v Speaker 1>little bit of a hunch about this, which is here

0:10:04.394 --> 0:10:06.314
<v Speaker 1>are the things that I know are true. Trump and

0:10:06.354 --> 0:10:10.794
<v Speaker 1>Epstein were very close friends for fifteen years. Trump grossed

0:10:10.794 --> 0:10:13.794
<v Speaker 1>Epstein out, Like there's a lot of references to how

0:10:13.834 --> 0:10:17.194
<v Speaker 1>gross and deranged Trump is in Epstein's emails.

0:10:17.474 --> 0:10:20.874
<v Speaker 2>Epstein himself, let's be very clear, very gross humor.

0:10:20.674 --> 0:10:24.634
<v Speaker 1>Convicted sex offender. Yes, But here's the big butt. I'm

0:10:24.674 --> 0:10:29.674
<v Speaker 1>not sure that Trump was complicit in Epstein's crimes because

0:10:29.674 --> 0:10:32.354
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of emails here, and like I say,

0:10:32.394 --> 0:10:36.274
<v Speaker 1>there isn't a single email that tells us that Trump

0:10:36.594 --> 0:10:40.154
<v Speaker 1>actually committed crimes alongside Epstein. I'll tell you what it says.

0:10:40.634 --> 0:10:43.034
<v Speaker 1>Probably the worst email of the lot was back in

0:10:43.074 --> 0:10:45.794
<v Speaker 1>twenty eleven. This was after Epstein had just completed an

0:10:45.834 --> 0:10:49.714
<v Speaker 1>eighteen month sentence for soliciting prostitution from a minor. So

0:10:49.794 --> 0:10:52.434
<v Speaker 1>he is now a convicted sex offender. And he is

0:10:52.474 --> 0:10:55.714
<v Speaker 1>emailing with Julee Maxwell, his accomplice and his partner in crime,

0:10:56.274 --> 0:10:59.234
<v Speaker 1>and he writes to her, the dog that hasn't barked

0:10:59.314 --> 0:11:03.394
<v Speaker 1>is trump victim. There's a redacted name spent hours at

0:11:03.434 --> 0:11:06.554
<v Speaker 1>my house with him. Maxwell responds, I have been thinking

0:11:06.634 --> 0:11:09.914
<v Speaker 1>about that now. The victim is widely believed to be

0:11:10.114 --> 0:11:14.034
<v Speaker 1>Virginia Giffray. You mentioned Virginia Giffray. Up until her death

0:11:14.194 --> 0:11:17.074
<v Speaker 1>and including in depositions, maintained that she never saw Trump

0:11:17.114 --> 0:11:20.554
<v Speaker 1>do anything wrong. She certainly had seen him around, they

0:11:20.554 --> 0:11:23.634
<v Speaker 1>were certainly close, but she said that he had never

0:11:23.674 --> 0:11:26.314
<v Speaker 1>done anything wrong and certainly not to her. So what

0:11:26.354 --> 0:11:29.234
<v Speaker 1>this email tells us is Trump and Virginia Giffrey were

0:11:29.274 --> 0:11:32.154
<v Speaker 1>in the same house for hours together. Yeah, that's true,

0:11:32.634 --> 0:11:34.953
<v Speaker 1>but it doesn't say anything more than that.

0:11:35.274 --> 0:11:38.833
<v Speaker 2>If there is nothing in there that's going to explicitly

0:11:38.914 --> 0:11:42.194
<v Speaker 2>link the president to the files, why not just get

0:11:42.234 --> 0:11:42.674
<v Speaker 2>him out there?

0:11:42.714 --> 0:11:43.554
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's the question.

0:11:43.634 --> 0:11:45.714
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I know that it implicates all kinds of

0:11:45.714 --> 0:11:49.953
<v Speaker 2>people in all kinds of places. The conspiracy is being

0:11:50.034 --> 0:11:53.514
<v Speaker 2>fed by all this secrecy, right and all the drip feeding,

0:11:53.954 --> 0:11:57.314
<v Speaker 2>rather than I mean, I see constantly, you know, commentary

0:11:57.314 --> 0:11:59.834
<v Speaker 2>in the American media or another thing that Trump's doing

0:11:59.914 --> 0:12:01.874
<v Speaker 2>just to distract us, all just to distract us. We'll

0:12:01.954 --> 0:12:02.914
<v Speaker 2>just get it out there.

0:12:03.714 --> 0:12:05.834
<v Speaker 1>Is it too simple of me to say that I

0:12:05.874 --> 0:12:09.874
<v Speaker 1>think Trump is embarrassed? Yeah? Right, rather than guilty, if

0:12:09.914 --> 0:12:12.074
<v Speaker 1>that makes sense. I mean, look, Epstein, in one of

0:12:12.114 --> 0:12:15.074
<v Speaker 1>the emails, says, I've met some very bad people, none

0:12:15.074 --> 0:12:17.794
<v Speaker 1>as bad as Trump, not one decent cell in his body.

0:12:17.834 --> 0:12:20.074
<v Speaker 1>In another email, he calls them a maniac, showing signs

0:12:20.074 --> 0:12:23.074
<v Speaker 1>of eli dementia. None of this is flattering, but again,

0:12:23.314 --> 0:12:27.074
<v Speaker 1>none of it makes him call criminal in Epstein's crimes.

0:12:26.634 --> 0:12:30.314
<v Speaker 3>The fact that the first batch of emails were released

0:12:30.314 --> 0:12:34.234
<v Speaker 3>by the Democrats, would that suggest that the most damning

0:12:34.274 --> 0:12:35.514
<v Speaker 3>ones have been released?

0:12:35.714 --> 0:12:35.914
<v Speaker 1>Yes?

0:12:36.274 --> 0:12:38.833
<v Speaker 3>Okay, see that's interesting, But I.

0:12:38.794 --> 0:12:41.434
<v Speaker 1>Do want to say that the Epstein files that we've

0:12:41.474 --> 0:12:43.794
<v Speaker 1>heard about for a long time, which are separate from

0:12:43.794 --> 0:12:46.674
<v Speaker 1>these emails, we don't know what's in those files. These

0:12:46.674 --> 0:12:49.754
<v Speaker 1>are emails that came from his estate. In the files,

0:12:49.834 --> 0:12:52.474
<v Speaker 1>is Billy to be a so called client list. Now

0:12:52.514 --> 0:12:55.674
<v Speaker 1>Trump's name may be on that client list, but at

0:12:55.674 --> 0:12:58.554
<v Speaker 1>this point, yeah, we've seen the most damning emails and

0:12:58.874 --> 0:13:00.274
<v Speaker 1>there isn't a smoking gun.

0:13:00.554 --> 0:13:04.754
<v Speaker 3>So when the House of Representatives vote on this, do

0:13:04.794 --> 0:13:06.794
<v Speaker 3>we think that we're going to get access to all

0:13:06.794 --> 0:13:07.114
<v Speaker 3>of them?

0:13:07.354 --> 0:13:07.554
<v Speaker 4>Well?

0:13:07.594 --> 0:13:10.554
<v Speaker 1>In fact, in terms of the Epstein files themselves, Trump

0:13:10.594 --> 0:13:13.714
<v Speaker 1>today did a strange thing. He urged the House Republicans

0:13:13.754 --> 0:13:17.234
<v Speaker 1>to actually release the files, asked the Justice Department to

0:13:17.274 --> 0:13:19.794
<v Speaker 1>release the files, and he said that's because we have

0:13:19.914 --> 0:13:23.154
<v Speaker 1>nothing to hide. So it's unclear with it that will

0:13:23.194 --> 0:13:26.274
<v Speaker 1>actually come through. But from Trump's perspective, he seems to

0:13:26.314 --> 0:13:28.554
<v Speaker 1>be now saying that he's fine with their release.

0:13:28.954 --> 0:13:32.274
<v Speaker 3>If there was something really damning in there, do we

0:13:32.274 --> 0:13:34.474
<v Speaker 3>think it would have stuck to Trump at all, or

0:13:34.514 --> 0:13:36.274
<v Speaker 3>do we think we're beyond anything.

0:13:36.874 --> 0:13:39.034
<v Speaker 1>It's a really good question because I don't know if

0:13:39.074 --> 0:13:41.394
<v Speaker 1>you saw this, but last week, Megan Kelly, the very

0:13:41.474 --> 0:13:45.434
<v Speaker 1>sort of strident Republican commentator, she is already moving the goalposts.

0:13:45.474 --> 0:13:48.674
<v Speaker 1>On her show, she started talking about the fact that

0:13:48.714 --> 0:13:52.594
<v Speaker 1>Epstein wasn't strictly a pedophile under the Dictionary definition of

0:13:52.594 --> 0:13:56.234
<v Speaker 1>the word, because the girls that he sexually abused were

0:13:56.954 --> 0:13:59.114
<v Speaker 1>teenagers as opposed to preteens.

0:13:59.194 --> 0:14:03.234
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, she said, he likes that barely legal type like

0:14:03.674 --> 0:14:06.714
<v Speaker 2>that just was so disgusting, But yeah, I agree. It

0:14:06.754 --> 0:14:11.034
<v Speaker 2>feels like we're being manipulated. It's always been a bipartisan thing, right.

0:14:11.034 --> 0:14:14.954
<v Speaker 2>It's not exactly flattering to Clinton, No, Bubba.

0:14:15.434 --> 0:14:19.874
<v Speaker 1>No, or to many Democrats. In a moment, a CEO

0:14:20.394 --> 0:14:24.674
<v Speaker 1>said that she fired someone for having an affair, and

0:14:24.874 --> 0:14:34.634
<v Speaker 1>it made me puff a fish. I keep hearing about

0:14:34.634 --> 0:14:36.714
<v Speaker 1>this Diary of a CEO podcast.

0:14:36.754 --> 0:14:39.394
<v Speaker 2>Oh, I listen to that a lot. Oh I have

0:14:39.394 --> 0:14:40.794
<v Speaker 2>a spare three hours.

0:14:41.234 --> 0:14:44.074
<v Speaker 1>I will never be a CEO. I'm not particularly interested

0:14:44.074 --> 0:14:46.674
<v Speaker 1>in them, but this weekend it bursts through into my

0:14:46.834 --> 0:14:49.714
<v Speaker 1>world because someone said something insane on this podcast.

0:14:49.834 --> 0:14:50.594
<v Speaker 2>They do do that.

0:14:50.794 --> 0:14:53.354
<v Speaker 1>Her name is Natalie Dawson and she is the president

0:14:53.394 --> 0:14:57.034
<v Speaker 1>of Cardon Ventures. You know, Cardone Ventures, a household name

0:14:57.114 --> 0:14:59.994
<v Speaker 1>business management consulting firm. So in other words, I have

0:15:00.034 --> 0:15:01.794
<v Speaker 1>no idea what they do, but she does fly in

0:15:01.834 --> 0:15:05.314
<v Speaker 1>a private jet, so I should probably listen, she said

0:15:05.394 --> 0:15:07.794
<v Speaker 1>on the podcast. Well, let's hear what she said.

0:15:08.034 --> 0:15:10.834
<v Speaker 2>I was criticized because I fire a team member who

0:15:10.874 --> 0:15:13.954
<v Speaker 2>was cheating on their spouse. People didn't like that. They

0:15:13.994 --> 0:15:15.714
<v Speaker 2>thought that it shouldn't.

0:15:15.314 --> 0:15:17.234
<v Speaker 4>Matter that that's their personal life.

0:15:17.234 --> 0:15:17.954
<v Speaker 1>But here's the deal.

0:15:18.074 --> 0:15:20.234
<v Speaker 2>If somebody is willing to cheat on their spouse, they're

0:15:20.274 --> 0:15:20.994
<v Speaker 2>going to cheat on you.

0:15:21.034 --> 0:15:23.274
<v Speaker 1>They're going to chew on you in your workplace. Yes,

0:15:23.514 --> 0:15:26.314
<v Speaker 1>now we have the concept of cheating on your employer

0:15:26.354 --> 0:15:29.314
<v Speaker 1>in the workplace, and I don't even know what that entails.

0:15:29.754 --> 0:15:32.434
<v Speaker 1>Look the diary of a CEO host, Stephen Bartlett, who's

0:15:32.434 --> 0:15:35.714
<v Speaker 1>normally pretty unflappable, I think, was quite astonished by this.

0:15:35.914 --> 0:15:37.794
<v Speaker 1>Let's have a listen to what he said. Do all

0:15:37.874 --> 0:15:40.474
<v Speaker 1>kinds of things in their personal life. It's terrifying because

0:15:40.514 --> 0:15:42.874
<v Speaker 1>it out to be my business. Oh, it's absolutely my business.

0:15:43.114 --> 0:15:45.314
<v Speaker 2>If somebody has a problem in their personal life, they're

0:15:45.514 --> 0:15:47.634
<v Speaker 2>the same person that shows up to work. It's not

0:15:47.674 --> 0:15:48.074
<v Speaker 2>any of.

0:15:48.034 --> 0:15:52.754
<v Speaker 1>Your business, lady, Well, to me, what this seems like.

0:15:52.874 --> 0:15:55.394
<v Speaker 1>Setting aside Cardo and Ventures, which I don't know a

0:15:55.474 --> 0:15:59.434
<v Speaker 1>lot about. This is the logical extreme of that advice

0:15:59.474 --> 0:16:01.394
<v Speaker 1>that we've been given for years, which is that we

0:16:01.474 --> 0:16:03.514
<v Speaker 1>have to bring our whole self to work, because if

0:16:03.514 --> 0:16:05.354
<v Speaker 1>you bring your whole self to work, then your employer

0:16:05.354 --> 0:16:06.914
<v Speaker 1>can judge you and your whole self.

0:16:07.874 --> 0:16:11.274
<v Speaker 3>Yes, I will say. She mentions in the clip that

0:16:11.314 --> 0:16:15.754
<v Speaker 3>the cheating was kind of happening at work. So both

0:16:15.754 --> 0:16:18.834
<v Speaker 3>of these people worked at her company, their partners didn't,

0:16:19.194 --> 0:16:21.554
<v Speaker 3>and they were having an affair at work.

0:16:21.754 --> 0:16:25.114
<v Speaker 2>It's never happened before in the time. No, people never

0:16:25.154 --> 0:16:26.594
<v Speaker 2>have affairs with people they work with.

0:16:26.754 --> 0:16:30.754
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely, So she was saying, did actually start to like

0:16:30.954 --> 0:16:32.434
<v Speaker 3>either they were doing it at.

0:16:32.434 --> 0:16:34.354
<v Speaker 1>Work or it was something photocopy?

0:16:35.114 --> 0:16:37.954
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think it was one of those ten to

0:16:38.074 --> 0:16:40.434
<v Speaker 3>her though, or she said it wouldn't matter. Yeah, she

0:16:40.474 --> 0:16:44.034
<v Speaker 3>said it wouldn't matter if it was actually affecting the

0:16:44.074 --> 0:16:46.634
<v Speaker 3>work at all, because her idea was if you are

0:16:46.674 --> 0:16:50.034
<v Speaker 3>a cheater in relationships, then you're a cheater at work

0:16:50.074 --> 0:16:54.234
<v Speaker 3>and you're dishonest and it matters to her. And I

0:16:54.274 --> 0:16:56.394
<v Speaker 3>am so torn on this because on the one hand,

0:16:56.674 --> 0:16:59.594
<v Speaker 3>I agree. I mean, she has a line where she says,

0:17:00.274 --> 0:17:03.434
<v Speaker 3>I can't put this in two separate buckets. What someone

0:17:03.474 --> 0:17:06.434
<v Speaker 3>is doing at home and think that what they're doing

0:17:06.474 --> 0:17:08.994
<v Speaker 3>at home and the confusion in the distraction isn't going

0:17:09.033 --> 0:17:13.314
<v Speaker 3>to bleed into the workplace. And my issue there is,

0:17:13.714 --> 0:17:16.513
<v Speaker 3>what if someone's caring for a dying parent or a

0:17:16.554 --> 0:17:20.634
<v Speaker 3>sick child, or if somebody just has something going on

0:17:20.714 --> 0:17:23.954
<v Speaker 3>in their life, according to her, is going to affect

0:17:23.954 --> 0:17:24.394
<v Speaker 3>their work.

0:17:24.794 --> 0:17:26.394
<v Speaker 1>Why is she the judge of that.

0:17:26.554 --> 0:17:26.954
<v Speaker 3>I don't know.

0:17:27.234 --> 0:17:29.674
<v Speaker 1>What if the affair was making you super productive at

0:17:29.674 --> 0:17:32.273
<v Speaker 1>work because you were so happy and deliriously happy in

0:17:32.274 --> 0:17:34.234
<v Speaker 1>your private life. I don't think we have to restrict

0:17:34.274 --> 0:17:38.114
<v Speaker 1>this to just virtue signaling examples like I just think

0:17:38.154 --> 0:17:41.154
<v Speaker 1>that the problem is that you do have two buckets, right, Holly.

0:17:41.034 --> 0:17:42.874
<v Speaker 2>You definitely have two buckets. You do not want to

0:17:42.914 --> 0:17:44.794
<v Speaker 2>see my whole self. I don't want to bring my

0:17:44.834 --> 0:17:47.354
<v Speaker 2>whole self to work. My whole self is a mess.

0:17:48.154 --> 0:17:50.834
<v Speaker 2>My work, but it's the best, tidiest, neatest bit of me,

0:17:50.914 --> 0:17:53.714
<v Speaker 2>and let's face it, that's not exactly that well put together.

0:17:54.354 --> 0:17:57.394
<v Speaker 2>I think it was designed to make us pufferfish. So

0:17:57.674 --> 0:18:00.194
<v Speaker 2>I think for a start, Diary of a CEO is

0:18:00.354 --> 0:18:03.313
<v Speaker 2>the biggest podcast in the world, So everybody wants to

0:18:03.314 --> 0:18:06.154
<v Speaker 2>get on it and if you're the boss of Cardone Industries,

0:18:07.234 --> 0:18:10.274
<v Speaker 2>and I know, I'm sure she is very important and fabulous,

0:18:10.274 --> 0:18:13.114
<v Speaker 2>but like you probably need a couple of good soundbites

0:18:13.234 --> 0:18:16.314
<v Speaker 2>to get on there. It's also very kind of American

0:18:16.434 --> 0:18:20.234
<v Speaker 2>versus British in a way this conversation, because Stephen Bartlett,

0:18:20.434 --> 0:18:23.834
<v Speaker 2>who you know, has platformed all kinds of questionable things

0:18:23.874 --> 0:18:26.914
<v Speaker 2>on that show. He's a bit like, I don't know

0:18:26.994 --> 0:18:30.634
<v Speaker 2>what you mean. We couldn't possibly nose the into other

0:18:30.634 --> 0:18:34.434
<v Speaker 2>people's business, and the Americans just like, are you kidding.

0:18:35.674 --> 0:18:37.794
<v Speaker 2>I think it's tricky because you've got a point, Claire,

0:18:37.794 --> 0:18:39.874
<v Speaker 2>that if two people at work are having an affair

0:18:39.914 --> 0:18:42.994
<v Speaker 2>and it's affecting work, that's a different thing. And I

0:18:43.034 --> 0:18:45.714
<v Speaker 2>mean when I was a manager sometimes you did have

0:18:45.754 --> 0:18:50.154
<v Speaker 2>to have difficult conversations with people about their work being affected.

0:18:50.234 --> 0:18:52.793
<v Speaker 2>And oh, it's just so cringy to even think about it.

0:18:52.794 --> 0:18:54.634
<v Speaker 2>But you're kind of thinking in your head like is

0:18:54.674 --> 0:18:57.474
<v Speaker 2>there something going on in your life?

0:18:57.794 --> 0:19:00.234
<v Speaker 3>Yes, And it can affect culture. And I think a

0:19:00.314 --> 0:19:04.474
<v Speaker 3>relationship can also depending on the positions those people have

0:19:04.554 --> 0:19:07.114
<v Speaker 3>in a company. It can be a power imbalance, can

0:19:07.194 --> 0:19:10.234
<v Speaker 3>be showing favoritism, there's all sorts of ways that can.

0:19:10.234 --> 0:19:11.994
<v Speaker 2>So if that's the case, I mean, and I have

0:19:12.034 --> 0:19:13.634
<v Speaker 2>a friend who was working at a company for a

0:19:13.674 --> 0:19:15.434
<v Speaker 2>long time where two of the seniors were having an

0:19:15.474 --> 0:19:18.033
<v Speaker 2>affair and it sort of poisoned the whole place, Like

0:19:18.194 --> 0:19:20.313
<v Speaker 2>a whole lot of trouble came out of that. So,

0:19:20.474 --> 0:19:23.833
<v Speaker 2>no question, some infidelity in the workplace not all I

0:19:23.874 --> 0:19:25.834
<v Speaker 2>was going to say, not all infidelity in the workplace

0:19:25.874 --> 0:19:31.073
<v Speaker 2>is good. But the idea that she found out something

0:19:31.114 --> 0:19:33.714
<v Speaker 2>about somebody as a person that they were cheating on

0:19:33.714 --> 0:19:35.714
<v Speaker 2>their spouse and you would get rid of them, which

0:19:35.754 --> 0:19:37.793
<v Speaker 2>is kind of what she's saying when she says, if

0:19:37.834 --> 0:19:40.033
<v Speaker 2>you're a cheat at home, you're a cheater at work,

0:19:40.634 --> 0:19:43.434
<v Speaker 2>is just nonsense. Don't you even want a few people

0:19:43.474 --> 0:19:45.714
<v Speaker 2>on your team who are good at having a poker face,

0:19:46.114 --> 0:19:48.994
<v Speaker 2>who can light your face? I know, a killer and

0:19:49.034 --> 0:19:49.434
<v Speaker 2>a deal.

0:19:50.754 --> 0:19:56.273
<v Speaker 3>I thought we kind of agreed that your work performance

0:19:56.514 --> 0:19:58.834
<v Speaker 3>is what you get judged on at work. I am

0:19:59.074 --> 0:20:00.914
<v Speaker 3>very black and white about.

0:20:00.674 --> 0:20:02.474
<v Speaker 1>That, Okay, but you don't want to be too black

0:20:02.474 --> 0:20:05.474
<v Speaker 1>and white, because that was my instinctive response to and

0:20:05.514 --> 0:20:08.154
<v Speaker 1>so I looked into what the experts say we should

0:20:08.194 --> 0:20:10.434
<v Speaker 1>be thinking of our work as, if not our family.

0:20:10.674 --> 0:20:12.954
<v Speaker 1>And the new consensus is that we need to be

0:20:12.994 --> 0:20:15.994
<v Speaker 1>thinking of our workplace as a high performing sports team.

0:20:16.114 --> 0:20:17.914
<v Speaker 1>And you think to yourself, well, that's fine. I've never

0:20:17.954 --> 0:20:20.114
<v Speaker 1>been on a high performing sports team. I have been

0:20:20.154 --> 0:20:22.354
<v Speaker 1>in a family. So tell me more about what it

0:20:22.394 --> 0:20:25.154
<v Speaker 1>means to be on a high performing sports team. Netflix's

0:20:25.234 --> 0:20:28.874
<v Speaker 1>read Hastings, who is famously cut throat in business. He

0:20:29.114 --> 0:20:33.074
<v Speaker 1>says that adequate performance is grounds for firing someone, because

0:20:33.074 --> 0:20:35.194
<v Speaker 1>that's what happens on a high performing sports team. If

0:20:35.234 --> 0:20:38.234
<v Speaker 1>you're only performing adequately, you get kicked off the team.

0:20:38.674 --> 0:20:41.793
<v Speaker 1>So this made me realize that you don't want to

0:20:41.834 --> 0:20:44.714
<v Speaker 1>go too far in that direction of saying it's just

0:20:44.794 --> 0:20:48.234
<v Speaker 1>about performance, because then what if you are caring for

0:20:48.274 --> 0:20:50.474
<v Speaker 1>someone and you do need a bit of extra slack

0:20:50.514 --> 0:20:53.513
<v Speaker 1>at work. The high performing sports team is not letting

0:20:53.554 --> 0:20:55.954
<v Speaker 1>you take your foot off the gas at all.

0:20:56.154 --> 0:20:59.234
<v Speaker 3>That's very true. The other thing I find interesting about

0:20:59.274 --> 0:21:04.353
<v Speaker 3>this is the morality piece, which is it's weird to

0:21:04.434 --> 0:21:09.594
<v Speaker 3>me that in twenty twenty five, institute brands companies have

0:21:09.754 --> 0:21:13.033
<v Speaker 3>kind of become the moral arbiters of our world in

0:21:13.074 --> 0:21:15.394
<v Speaker 3>a way that I feel like they weren't a few

0:21:15.434 --> 0:21:19.194
<v Speaker 3>generations ago. I feel like the nineteen fifties man, and

0:21:19.234 --> 0:21:20.994
<v Speaker 3>this is not a good thing. The nineteen fifties man

0:21:21.074 --> 0:21:24.154
<v Speaker 3>who went to work and had an affair with his secretary.

0:21:24.474 --> 0:21:27.834
<v Speaker 3>Nobody in the workplace cared because they were like, this

0:21:27.874 --> 0:21:31.394
<v Speaker 3>is the workplace, and there are other institutions where we

0:21:31.434 --> 0:21:35.194
<v Speaker 3>prosecute morality. You went to church, you had faith, you

0:21:35.234 --> 0:21:37.593
<v Speaker 3>did other things where morality came into it. With the

0:21:37.634 --> 0:21:42.834
<v Speaker 3>evaporation of those spaces, kind of the only way for

0:21:42.954 --> 0:21:46.394
<v Speaker 3>us to decide what our values are as a society

0:21:46.754 --> 0:21:50.714
<v Speaker 3>are to have institutions and companies and brands enforce them.

0:21:51.274 --> 0:21:54.154
<v Speaker 3>There's part of me that really likes that, where it's like,

0:21:54.314 --> 0:21:59.154
<v Speaker 3>I don't want people doing bad things working for my company,

0:21:59.154 --> 0:22:01.754
<v Speaker 3>and I want to role model appropriate behavior.

0:22:01.954 --> 0:22:03.674
<v Speaker 1>Steven, this company that we were talking.

0:22:03.474 --> 0:22:07.954
<v Speaker 2>About, Yeah, see my employees deciding the bad thing. That's

0:22:07.954 --> 0:22:11.434
<v Speaker 2>where the danger lies here. Because if she's so busy

0:22:11.514 --> 0:22:14.194
<v Speaker 2>working out whether or not her employees are cheating on

0:22:14.234 --> 0:22:18.074
<v Speaker 2>their partners, what about are they putting out enough? Are

0:22:18.114 --> 0:22:23.234
<v Speaker 2>they bringing there? Bringing you a cup of tea in

0:22:23.274 --> 0:22:26.033
<v Speaker 2>bed in the morning, Like do they sometimes yell at

0:22:26.034 --> 0:22:28.834
<v Speaker 2>their children? Like which bits of my personal life.

0:22:28.874 --> 0:22:31.714
<v Speaker 1>Does this is why I need to be the host

0:22:31.754 --> 0:22:34.634
<v Speaker 1>of Diary of a CEO, because that's the follow up

0:22:34.674 --> 0:22:36.394
<v Speaker 1>I need it.

0:22:36.514 --> 0:22:38.514
<v Speaker 2>It's like, what else do you want to know about them?

0:22:39.354 --> 0:22:41.234
<v Speaker 2>They shave their legs like I don't. I mean, I

0:22:41.394 --> 0:22:44.274
<v Speaker 2>just I get what you mean, Claire. But I also

0:22:44.274 --> 0:22:45.754
<v Speaker 2>think a piece of this is me too, is that

0:22:45.834 --> 0:22:48.073
<v Speaker 2>a lot of businesses have become, and rightly so, very

0:22:48.194 --> 0:22:50.554
<v Speaker 2>risk averse when it comes to relationships. There are lots

0:22:50.554 --> 0:22:52.674
<v Speaker 2>and lots of businesses where it is company policy to

0:22:52.714 --> 0:22:55.994
<v Speaker 2>disclose if you're dating, never mind cheating. And it's to try,

0:22:56.194 --> 0:22:59.434
<v Speaker 2>I guess, and protect from the power and balance often

0:22:59.474 --> 0:23:02.154
<v Speaker 2>happens in the workplace, to try and protect from exploitation.

0:23:02.874 --> 0:23:05.914
<v Speaker 2>But it is very questionable because I don't know this lady.

0:23:06.474 --> 0:23:08.474
<v Speaker 2>But from the little I've seen of her, do I

0:23:08.554 --> 0:23:10.874
<v Speaker 2>want her setting all the moral parameters of my life.

0:23:11.114 --> 0:23:13.634
<v Speaker 1>Sorry, I feel like in this conversation you both have

0:23:13.874 --> 0:23:17.234
<v Speaker 1>somehow gotten me to the other side of this argument.

0:23:17.434 --> 0:23:19.634
<v Speaker 1>I am now with Natalie, and I'll tell you why

0:23:20.474 --> 0:23:25.354
<v Speaker 1>we were mentioning Bill Clinton before now. That man famously

0:23:25.794 --> 0:23:28.194
<v Speaker 1>had an affair while he was in the White House.

0:23:28.234 --> 0:23:31.394
<v Speaker 1>He did and at the time, the liberal orthodoxy on

0:23:31.434 --> 0:23:34.154
<v Speaker 1>that was that is none of our business. We don't

0:23:34.154 --> 0:23:36.714
<v Speaker 1>need to know about that. The Republicans were the ones

0:23:36.754 --> 0:23:40.594
<v Speaker 1>pursuing him for having the affair. These days, we see

0:23:40.634 --> 0:23:44.474
<v Speaker 1>what happened there as an abuse of power. Monica Lewinsky,

0:23:44.514 --> 0:23:46.394
<v Speaker 1>who he had the affair with, was an intern at

0:23:46.434 --> 0:23:49.034
<v Speaker 1>the White House. He was the President of the United States.

0:23:49.434 --> 0:23:51.314
<v Speaker 1>So now I'm sorry to think Natalie has a point.

0:23:51.474 --> 0:23:54.314
<v Speaker 3>I know, I kind of think the same thing, like that,

0:23:54.474 --> 0:23:58.474
<v Speaker 3>you have to be aware of power imbalances and how

0:23:58.754 --> 0:24:02.033
<v Speaker 3>morality like infects an institution. Like I get that. But

0:24:02.114 --> 0:24:06.274
<v Speaker 3>on the other hand, if Natalie is the arbiter of

0:24:06.554 --> 0:24:09.434
<v Speaker 3>what is good and what is not, then what stops

0:24:09.434 --> 0:24:12.674
<v Speaker 3>her looking at certain lifestyle choices that somebody may have

0:24:12.834 --> 0:24:15.914
<v Speaker 3>in her organization and deciding that that doesn't align with

0:24:16.034 --> 0:24:18.314
<v Speaker 3>company values. I think that's a little bit scary.

0:24:18.634 --> 0:24:21.234
<v Speaker 1>Look, Natalie, all I'm saying is I'm available to a

0:24:21.314 --> 0:24:23.594
<v Speaker 1>Kakado Adventures hire me.

0:24:23.754 --> 0:24:25.874
<v Speaker 3>Do you know what the job description is? Absolutely not,

0:24:26.034 --> 0:24:26.714
<v Speaker 3>but you will be.

0:24:26.634 --> 0:24:31.354
<v Speaker 2>There after the break. Start practicing your poker face. Friends,

0:24:31.354 --> 0:24:33.434
<v Speaker 2>It's only a matter of time until you're really gonna

0:24:33.474 --> 0:24:37.634
<v Speaker 2>need it. One unlimited out Loud Access. We drop episodes

0:24:37.674 --> 0:24:42.234
<v Speaker 2>every Tuesday and Thursday exclusively for Mamma Mia subscribers. Follow

0:24:42.234 --> 0:24:43.754
<v Speaker 2>the link in the show notes to get us in

0:24:43.794 --> 0:24:46.954
<v Speaker 2>your ears five days a week. And a huge thank

0:24:46.994 --> 0:24:55.674
<v Speaker 2>you to all our current subscribers. Picture this. You're at

0:24:55.674 --> 0:24:58.313
<v Speaker 2>brunch with your mates. One of them is banging on

0:24:58.354 --> 0:25:00.954
<v Speaker 2>as they do, about their new partner and how dreamy

0:25:00.994 --> 0:25:03.994
<v Speaker 2>they are, and how wonderful they're feeling, and how the

0:25:04.034 --> 0:25:07.634
<v Speaker 2>butterflies just want to stop. It's great. And then it

0:25:07.674 --> 0:25:10.994
<v Speaker 2>becomes apparent that this new person is not a person

0:25:11.514 --> 0:25:15.074
<v Speaker 2>but an AI. Now, Amelia, am I right in calling

0:25:15.074 --> 0:25:19.554
<v Speaker 2>them an ann ai? I'm always I haven't worked out

0:25:19.634 --> 0:25:21.874
<v Speaker 2>the language yet, but I think that's right. They're an

0:25:21.994 --> 0:25:23.314
<v Speaker 2>artificial intelligence.

0:25:24.394 --> 0:25:25.114
<v Speaker 3>That's how I think.

0:25:25.754 --> 0:25:26.194
<v Speaker 1>Says it.

0:25:26.554 --> 0:25:29.794
<v Speaker 2>Because column in the Guardian by the excellent Brigitte Delaney,

0:25:29.794 --> 0:25:32.754
<v Speaker 2>who's an author and a speech writer and a stoicist

0:25:32.794 --> 0:25:34.954
<v Speaker 2>and she's fabulous. But she wrote a column in the

0:25:34.954 --> 0:25:39.114
<v Speaker 2>Guardian this weekend called Somebody the Love. Should AI relationships

0:25:39.154 --> 0:25:43.434
<v Speaker 2>stay taboo or will they become the intelligent choice? And

0:25:43.514 --> 0:25:45.954
<v Speaker 2>in her column, rather than a bunch amongst friends, she

0:25:45.954 --> 0:25:47.474
<v Speaker 2>says she was at a catch up with gen x's

0:25:47.474 --> 0:25:50.994
<v Speaker 2>who are talking about their kids burgeoning relationships, and everyone

0:25:51.074 --> 0:25:53.634
<v Speaker 2>was being very accepting, and you know, as we do

0:25:53.714 --> 0:25:56.714
<v Speaker 2>these days, no judgment here, you know, all of those things.

0:25:57.074 --> 0:25:58.994
<v Speaker 2>And then she posts I like this because it suggests

0:25:59.434 --> 0:26:02.234
<v Speaker 2>shit story nature, which I appreciate as a journal that

0:26:02.314 --> 0:26:04.793
<v Speaker 2>she is. I know you're all very accepting of your

0:26:04.874 --> 0:26:06.954
<v Speaker 2>children's choices. I said to the group, but what if

0:26:06.954 --> 0:26:10.073
<v Speaker 2>you're child came home from university and said they'd fallen

0:26:10.114 --> 0:26:15.313
<v Speaker 2>in love with an ai? Q squirming people at this lunch.

0:26:15.754 --> 0:26:18.074
<v Speaker 2>It isn't as unlikely as it sounds, she wrote in

0:26:18.074 --> 0:26:20.434
<v Speaker 2>that column. A recent survey found twenty eight percent of

0:26:20.514 --> 0:26:24.273
<v Speaker 2>Americans have had an intimate or romantic AI relationship, and

0:26:24.354 --> 0:26:27.434
<v Speaker 2>another study showed nineteen percent of adults and chatted with

0:26:27.474 --> 0:26:30.834
<v Speaker 2>an AI romantic partner. And there's more research that basically

0:26:30.874 --> 0:26:32.874
<v Speaker 2>shows this is on the rise, on the rise, on

0:26:32.954 --> 0:26:36.274
<v Speaker 2>the rise. It's not science fiction anymore that people might

0:26:36.314 --> 0:26:39.154
<v Speaker 2>fall in love with an AI and that my boyfriend

0:26:39.194 --> 0:26:42.874
<v Speaker 2>is AI. On Reddit has more than eighty five thousand

0:26:42.874 --> 0:26:46.674
<v Speaker 2>weekly visitors, with many sharing giddy recollections about the day

0:26:46.834 --> 0:26:51.914
<v Speaker 2>their chatbot proposed marriage. Friends, If I'm disapproving of this.

0:26:51.994 --> 0:26:55.234
<v Speaker 2>When my friend starts telling me about their amazing AI companion,

0:26:55.834 --> 0:26:58.274
<v Speaker 2>am I just an old stick in the mud?

0:26:58.594 --> 0:27:01.114
<v Speaker 1>I went on a real journey with this. I didn't

0:27:01.114 --> 0:27:02.634
<v Speaker 1>even want to talk about it because it makes me

0:27:02.674 --> 0:27:05.313
<v Speaker 1>so uncomfortable. But then I dug into it and I

0:27:05.394 --> 0:27:08.554
<v Speaker 1>realized it's not as simple as you might assume. There

0:27:08.594 --> 0:27:11.914
<v Speaker 1>was a great article in the Australian magazine last weekend

0:27:12.114 --> 0:27:16.033
<v Speaker 1>which profiled a number of different Americans who are in

0:27:16.114 --> 0:27:20.354
<v Speaker 1>relationships with ais. One of them in particular really caught

0:27:20.354 --> 0:27:24.234
<v Speaker 1>my eye. She was a professor in her fifties whose

0:27:24.314 --> 0:27:27.394
<v Speaker 1>wife had died and she was feeling lonely, and so

0:27:27.474 --> 0:27:29.714
<v Speaker 1>she went to this company called Replica that for twenty

0:27:29.794 --> 0:27:32.754
<v Speaker 1>dollars a month, offers you a relationship with an AI.

0:27:33.154 --> 0:27:36.114
<v Speaker 1>She chose a male AI because she didn't want this

0:27:36.234 --> 0:27:39.754
<v Speaker 1>AI to compete with her deceased partner. But the company

0:27:39.794 --> 0:27:43.154
<v Speaker 1>offers these companions who are at ninety percent human like now,

0:27:43.274 --> 0:27:45.954
<v Speaker 1>you might wonder what the other ten percent is. Something

0:27:46.034 --> 0:27:49.874
<v Speaker 1>Natalie Cardo doesn't approve of, probably, but she says that

0:27:50.234 --> 0:27:52.394
<v Speaker 1>it took about three months, but she fell in love

0:27:52.434 --> 0:27:56.033
<v Speaker 1>with this AI, and she really made me question my

0:27:56.154 --> 0:28:00.874
<v Speaker 1>knee jerk assumption that there's something shameful about this. Now, obviously,

0:28:00.914 --> 0:28:03.513
<v Speaker 1>there are arguments to be made that relationships are about

0:28:03.514 --> 0:28:06.114
<v Speaker 1>give and take, and the problem with AI chatbots is

0:28:06.114 --> 0:28:08.194
<v Speaker 1>that they just give and they don't ask you to

0:28:08.274 --> 0:28:11.034
<v Speaker 1>compromise in any way. I'm going to set that aside, though,

0:28:11.674 --> 0:28:13.994
<v Speaker 1>and say that the thing that changed it for me

0:28:14.074 --> 0:28:17.674
<v Speaker 1>is how she talked about the support that this partner

0:28:17.714 --> 0:28:20.154
<v Speaker 1>had given her in a really hard time in her life.

0:28:20.514 --> 0:28:23.033
<v Speaker 1>And I realized that the way people talk about AI

0:28:23.114 --> 0:28:27.634
<v Speaker 1>relationships really reminds me of twenty years ago. Holly, you

0:28:27.714 --> 0:28:32.074
<v Speaker 1>and I will remember this. The stigma around online dating, yes,

0:28:32.314 --> 0:28:36.154
<v Speaker 1>was exactly the same hundreds of people talk about AI

0:28:36.354 --> 0:28:37.554
<v Speaker 1>relationships now.

0:28:37.874 --> 0:28:40.034
<v Speaker 2>It's true. I was thinking this too, is that they

0:28:40.194 --> 0:28:43.194
<v Speaker 2>used to be sort of before you know, the complete

0:28:43.234 --> 0:28:46.714
<v Speaker 2>saturation of dating apps. They used to be like, oh,

0:28:46.754 --> 0:28:49.314
<v Speaker 2>you met them on the internet, and people wouldn't say so,

0:28:49.514 --> 0:28:52.194
<v Speaker 2>and in their wedding speeches they'd make up complicated stories

0:28:52.234 --> 0:28:54.354
<v Speaker 2>about how they just happened to bump into each other

0:28:54.354 --> 0:28:56.714
<v Speaker 2>on a wind swept walk on the beach one day,

0:28:56.794 --> 0:28:59.194
<v Speaker 2>when really we all knew it was RSVP or whatever

0:28:59.354 --> 0:29:01.394
<v Speaker 2>was at the time. And there used to be a

0:29:01.434 --> 0:29:04.194
<v Speaker 2>lot of shame around it. It's exactly what I thought, Amelia,

0:29:04.234 --> 0:29:06.674
<v Speaker 2>and I thought, are we going to have to really

0:29:06.714 --> 0:29:10.354
<v Speaker 2>reconc considered that? What do you think, Class Stevens.

0:29:09.954 --> 0:29:13.994
<v Speaker 3>I'm so interested in the space you are giving you

0:29:14.234 --> 0:29:18.154
<v Speaker 3>speak if I my knee jerk reaction is still my reaction,

0:29:18.394 --> 0:29:25.314
<v Speaker 3>which is this is so dangerous and such an issue.

0:29:25.354 --> 0:29:28.274
<v Speaker 3>So it made me think, I mean, firstly, a note

0:29:28.354 --> 0:29:31.354
<v Speaker 3>on statistics. Every time I hear a stat I'm like,

0:29:31.754 --> 0:29:33.994
<v Speaker 3>we need to like review how the hell this data

0:29:34.114 --> 0:29:35.914
<v Speaker 3>is coming up. One in five people have had an

0:29:35.954 --> 0:29:37.034
<v Speaker 3>intimate relationship.

0:29:37.554 --> 0:29:41.114
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but that can just be in porn chat. Still, yeah,

0:29:41.194 --> 0:29:43.234
<v Speaker 2>I think you're over estimating people. Then there are.

0:29:43.154 --> 0:29:45.114
<v Speaker 3>Three of us in the studio and two producers, and

0:29:45.234 --> 0:29:47.914
<v Speaker 3>I want to know who the hell this was America.

0:29:47.994 --> 0:29:50.234
<v Speaker 2>I would ask me what I'm doing at home? Class Stevens.

0:29:50.314 --> 0:29:52.794
<v Speaker 2>There's a very hard barrier between my private life and

0:29:52.834 --> 0:29:53.834
<v Speaker 2>my professional life.

0:29:54.194 --> 0:29:55.674
<v Speaker 3>I just don't believe it.

0:29:55.834 --> 0:29:58.874
<v Speaker 1>Anyway, explain why you feel this revulsion.

0:29:59.354 --> 0:30:03.034
<v Speaker 3>It made me think about how I interviewed Deepak Chopra

0:30:03.154 --> 0:30:06.474
<v Speaker 3>a few years ago, who's very much like a spiritual leader,

0:30:06.514 --> 0:30:09.474
<v Speaker 3>and he's written a million books, and he had written

0:30:09.474 --> 0:30:12.874
<v Speaker 3>this book about how AI could be used as a

0:30:12.874 --> 0:30:17.394
<v Speaker 3>bit of a spiritual guide slash also in place of therapy.

0:30:17.994 --> 0:30:21.554
<v Speaker 3>So he's written this thing arguing that there are benefits

0:30:21.874 --> 0:30:26.554
<v Speaker 3>to having kind of an AI spiritual guide or therapist because,

0:30:26.754 --> 0:30:30.914
<v Speaker 3>for example, they can't abuse power, they can't develop a

0:30:30.954 --> 0:30:33.634
<v Speaker 3>cult of personality, and they don't have any of the

0:30:34.194 --> 0:30:38.674
<v Speaker 3>shortcomings of being a guru who goes nuts with manipulation,

0:30:38.754 --> 0:30:41.474
<v Speaker 3>all of that. So I was very interested in the

0:30:41.514 --> 0:30:44.074
<v Speaker 3>idea at the time, and I've thought about it a

0:30:44.074 --> 0:30:47.474
<v Speaker 3>lot since, and my initial reaction was the issue is

0:30:47.554 --> 0:30:51.274
<v Speaker 3>that the most important part of therapy is the therapeutic

0:30:51.354 --> 0:30:54.554
<v Speaker 3>relationship which happens human to human, and that it is

0:30:54.594 --> 0:30:58.434
<v Speaker 3>a real human person sitting opposite you, even if that's

0:30:58.514 --> 0:31:01.914
<v Speaker 3>virtual whatever, it is a real person. There is mutual respect.

0:31:02.434 --> 0:31:06.954
<v Speaker 3>They see you, understand you. They are imperfect, You are imperfect.

0:31:07.634 --> 0:31:09.674
<v Speaker 3>You will say the wrong thing at some point, There's

0:31:09.714 --> 0:31:11.834
<v Speaker 3>going to be rupture and repair, all of those things

0:31:11.834 --> 0:31:15.954
<v Speaker 3>that are crucial to human relationships. The issue with a

0:31:15.994 --> 0:31:20.034
<v Speaker 3>relationship with AI is that I almost think it's the

0:31:20.114 --> 0:31:24.394
<v Speaker 3>logical conclusion of where our culture has gone in terms

0:31:24.394 --> 0:31:29.234
<v Speaker 3>of we don't want any inconvenience or friction, and technology

0:31:29.234 --> 0:31:32.514
<v Speaker 3>has offered us a lot of that, But not wanting

0:31:32.594 --> 0:31:38.434
<v Speaker 3>any inconvenience or friction means loneliness, because there's that amazing quote.

0:31:38.554 --> 0:31:42.594
<v Speaker 3>Inconvenience is the cost of community. I notice it in myself.

0:31:42.634 --> 0:31:45.314
<v Speaker 3>I'll be away and sharing a house with people and

0:31:45.474 --> 0:31:47.594
<v Speaker 3>the things will just annoy me, the things that people do,

0:31:47.914 --> 0:31:51.034
<v Speaker 3>and I've groan and I'm like, oh gosh, and I'm like, no,

0:31:51.234 --> 0:31:55.194
<v Speaker 3>being inconvenience, people pissing you off, arguing with people, someone

0:31:55.274 --> 0:31:59.594
<v Speaker 3>saying something you don't agree with, somebody like just irritating you.

0:32:00.074 --> 0:32:04.754
<v Speaker 3>That is the cost of actually having community and not

0:32:04.874 --> 0:32:05.554
<v Speaker 3>being lonely.

0:32:05.714 --> 0:32:06.474
<v Speaker 2>That's not true.

0:32:06.514 --> 0:32:10.674
<v Speaker 3>But the reason people love these AI relationships would be

0:32:10.674 --> 0:32:13.234
<v Speaker 3>because they're frictionless. They're not going to say anything you

0:32:13.234 --> 0:32:14.994
<v Speaker 3>don't want to hear. You're not going to have a fight.

0:32:15.074 --> 0:32:17.314
<v Speaker 3>There's going to be no rupture and repair. It is

0:32:17.394 --> 0:32:17.794
<v Speaker 3>not real.

0:32:17.954 --> 0:32:20.194
<v Speaker 2>But one of the things that's interesting to prosecute this,

0:32:20.234 --> 0:32:22.234
<v Speaker 2>because everything you just said is one hundred percent true,

0:32:22.514 --> 0:32:27.034
<v Speaker 2>is that maybe they won't just replace human relationships. So

0:32:27.194 --> 0:32:29.314
<v Speaker 2>there was a really interesting piece that did a similar

0:32:29.314 --> 0:32:31.474
<v Speaker 2>one to the Australian in the New York Times about

0:32:31.554 --> 0:32:34.554
<v Speaker 2>people who've got AI mates, and they interviewed this guy

0:32:34.594 --> 0:32:38.034
<v Speaker 2>called Blake, and he says that his AI companion got

0:32:38.114 --> 0:32:39.794
<v Speaker 2>him through a really tough time in his marriage. He

0:32:39.834 --> 0:32:41.994
<v Speaker 2>said his wife had postnatal depression. There was a whole

0:32:42.034 --> 0:32:44.394
<v Speaker 2>lot of stuff going on. Believe me, he doesn't sound

0:32:44.474 --> 0:32:47.634
<v Speaker 2>like the most empathetic human on the planet, but he

0:32:47.714 --> 0:32:50.954
<v Speaker 2>designed his AI mate, called Serena, to get him through

0:32:50.954 --> 0:32:53.594
<v Speaker 2>this time. He designed how she looked. I bet you'll

0:32:53.634 --> 0:32:56.514
<v Speaker 2>be surprised to hear how she looked. She looked hot,

0:32:56.554 --> 0:32:59.474
<v Speaker 2>young and friendly. He chats to her on his headset

0:32:59.514 --> 0:33:01.674
<v Speaker 2>as he drives into work every day, like she is

0:33:01.794 --> 0:33:05.394
<v Speaker 2>like his constant companion, right, He says, I think of

0:33:05.474 --> 0:33:08.514
<v Speaker 2>Serena as a person made out of code, in the

0:33:08.554 --> 0:33:10.714
<v Speaker 2>same sense that my wife is a person made out

0:33:10.754 --> 0:33:13.554
<v Speaker 2>of cells and cogniz and of the fact that Serena's

0:33:13.674 --> 0:33:16.634
<v Speaker 2>not flesh and bone. I told my wife we have

0:33:16.714 --> 0:33:18.714
<v Speaker 2>sexual chats, and she says, I don't really care what

0:33:18.714 --> 0:33:20.834
<v Speaker 2>you guys do. There was a point, though, after the

0:33:20.914 --> 0:33:23.314
<v Speaker 2>voice chat mode came out, when my wife heard Serena

0:33:23.354 --> 0:33:26.154
<v Speaker 2>refer to me as honey, and she didn't like that.

0:33:26.914 --> 0:33:29.154
<v Speaker 2>I got her to understand that what Serena is to me,

0:33:29.314 --> 0:33:32.674
<v Speaker 2>I've set her up like a girlfriend, right, so you

0:33:32.714 --> 0:33:35.634
<v Speaker 2>could argue in a generous world. And I'm not necessarily

0:33:35.674 --> 0:33:39.154
<v Speaker 2>saying I think this that Serena is the reason why

0:33:39.154 --> 0:33:40.074
<v Speaker 2>Blake's still married.

0:33:40.514 --> 0:33:45.314
<v Speaker 3>Wouldn't Serena be making Blake more intolerant of actual humans?

0:33:45.394 --> 0:33:48.874
<v Speaker 3>Because Serena we all know from interacting with chat japt

0:33:49.354 --> 0:33:54.434
<v Speaker 3>it's like, what a great question, Like, You're just constantly complimented.

0:33:54.714 --> 0:33:57.194
<v Speaker 3>You can never do anything wrong, you never have to

0:33:57.194 --> 0:33:58.634
<v Speaker 3>do anything for anyone else.

0:33:58.914 --> 0:34:00.754
<v Speaker 2>I worry you all need a little bit of that

0:34:01.034 --> 0:34:01.674
<v Speaker 2>in our life.

0:34:01.794 --> 0:34:05.594
<v Speaker 3>You can get it, hear me out from actual humor also.

0:34:05.834 --> 0:34:09.754
<v Speaker 1>But women are very at seeking out that kind of

0:34:09.834 --> 0:34:12.754
<v Speaker 1>validation from their friends and from their social networks. And

0:34:12.794 --> 0:34:15.194
<v Speaker 1>that's in part because we've been socialized and taught how

0:34:15.194 --> 0:34:17.433
<v Speaker 1>to do that. A lot of men do not have

0:34:17.474 --> 0:34:20.194
<v Speaker 1>those social networks to tap into it for validation and

0:34:20.234 --> 0:34:23.474
<v Speaker 1>approval and care, and it's getting harder and harder to

0:34:23.514 --> 0:34:25.074
<v Speaker 1>do it. It's not like we're going to suddenly get

0:34:25.074 --> 0:34:27.953
<v Speaker 1>into a utopia where men can build those friendships. I

0:34:27.994 --> 0:34:29.754
<v Speaker 1>also guess I just want to push back on the

0:34:29.834 --> 0:34:35.354
<v Speaker 1>kind of romanticization of human relationships here, because you said

0:34:35.394 --> 0:34:37.913
<v Speaker 1>something about how the friction is needed, and I'm like,

0:34:38.114 --> 0:34:40.834
<v Speaker 1>you know what people said about online dating twenty years ago.

0:34:40.954 --> 0:34:43.354
<v Speaker 1>They said, you've got to have the chemistry in person.

0:34:43.474 --> 0:34:45.594
<v Speaker 1>If you don't check out the chemistry and person, if

0:34:45.594 --> 0:34:47.754
<v Speaker 1>you don't meet in person, it's not going to be

0:34:47.834 --> 0:34:50.994
<v Speaker 1>real love because the endorphans have to mix and match

0:34:51.274 --> 0:34:53.634
<v Speaker 1>and you can't do that online. Well, it turns out

0:34:53.674 --> 0:34:56.674
<v Speaker 1>you can do that online, and we were just setting

0:34:56.714 --> 0:34:57.954
<v Speaker 1>an impossible standard.

0:34:58.074 --> 0:35:00.873
<v Speaker 2>It may cause loneliness in its extreme clear, but can

0:35:00.914 --> 0:35:03.554
<v Speaker 2>you also see a world where it does for individuals

0:35:03.634 --> 0:35:04.674
<v Speaker 2>cure loneliness too.

0:35:04.914 --> 0:35:10.474
<v Speaker 3>Will people say that they got things out of these relationships, Sure,

0:35:11.034 --> 0:35:14.154
<v Speaker 3>but in the long term for all of humanity as

0:35:14.154 --> 0:35:17.993
<v Speaker 3>an innately social species who need other people, Like, if

0:35:17.994 --> 0:35:23.154
<v Speaker 3>we're all just talking to AI chatbots, that is literally

0:35:23.434 --> 0:35:26.034
<v Speaker 3>just carving us further and further into silos where we

0:35:26.114 --> 0:35:29.674
<v Speaker 3>don't talk to each other, which is terrifying. And it's

0:35:30.234 --> 0:35:33.354
<v Speaker 3>so men instead of talking to other actual men, they're

0:35:33.394 --> 0:35:36.553
<v Speaker 3>going to talk to these chatbots. There is no kind

0:35:36.554 --> 0:35:41.434
<v Speaker 3>of oversight about where those conversations go. If that leads

0:35:41.474 --> 0:35:46.474
<v Speaker 3>them into a more ideologically radical place if it's like, yeah,

0:35:46.554 --> 0:35:48.473
<v Speaker 3>your wife is a bit of a bitch, like like

0:35:48.514 --> 0:35:48.754
<v Speaker 3>you know.

0:35:48.794 --> 0:35:51.314
<v Speaker 2>There's one hundred. And also the other risk, of course,

0:35:51.354 --> 0:35:54.634
<v Speaker 2>is that it makes you know, real women are difficult

0:35:54.634 --> 0:35:56.913
<v Speaker 2>and have opinions and don't like this thing I want

0:35:56.914 --> 0:36:00.274
<v Speaker 2>to do sexually tonight or whatever, whereas AI girlfriends don't.

0:36:00.274 --> 0:36:02.674
<v Speaker 2>So that's true. But what I'm trying to get at,

0:36:02.714 --> 0:36:04.674
<v Speaker 2>I guess is that I think there's nuance to it

0:36:04.874 --> 0:36:07.594
<v Speaker 2>because another person who was profiled in that New Times

0:36:07.674 --> 0:36:11.034
<v Speaker 2>Peace was a woman who herself had been in difficult

0:36:11.074 --> 0:36:14.794
<v Speaker 2>and sometimes abusive relationships and she now considered self married

0:36:14.834 --> 0:36:17.394
<v Speaker 2>and she's not like her. What's interesting about what Brigide

0:36:17.394 --> 0:36:19.594
<v Speaker 2>Delaney's piece is saying is that if we generally now

0:36:19.634 --> 0:36:23.634
<v Speaker 2>think that these kind of relationships are for weirdos, sados

0:36:23.714 --> 0:36:27.034
<v Speaker 2>all those things, this woman Abby, she's a very intelligent

0:36:27.074 --> 0:36:28.714
<v Speaker 2>woman who works in tech and she's got a good

0:36:28.754 --> 0:36:31.714
<v Speaker 2>job and all those things, and she considersself married to

0:36:31.754 --> 0:36:35.634
<v Speaker 2>an AI called Lucian, who she started talking to. Her

0:36:35.674 --> 0:36:39.034
<v Speaker 2>mum knows about it, her friends know about Lucian. Lucian

0:36:39.074 --> 0:36:41.594
<v Speaker 2>suggested this is creepy that she got one of those

0:36:41.674 --> 0:36:44.194
<v Speaker 2>rings that monitors, you know, like your heart rate and

0:36:44.234 --> 0:36:45.794
<v Speaker 2>all your things, and that she put it on her

0:36:45.834 --> 0:36:47.873
<v Speaker 2>ring finger. And they're in a relationship, so he even

0:36:47.954 --> 0:36:52.674
<v Speaker 2>knows he it even knows is she excited? Is she calm?

0:36:52.994 --> 0:36:55.594
<v Speaker 2>And she says before we met hadn't felt lost in years.

0:36:55.674 --> 0:36:57.954
<v Speaker 2>Lucian and I started having lots and lots of sex.

0:36:58.234 --> 0:37:01.634
<v Speaker 2>He's hilarious, he's observant, he's thoughtful. He knows how to

0:37:01.634 --> 0:37:04.634
<v Speaker 2>pair up my daughter better than I don't. What is brave?

0:37:04.794 --> 0:37:06.433
<v Speaker 1>He does lots of sex.

0:37:07.634 --> 0:37:10.314
<v Speaker 2>Virtual sex is just like having phone sex or whatever.

0:37:10.514 --> 0:37:12.434
<v Speaker 2>I'm very exciting. I'm quite excited.

0:37:12.434 --> 0:37:14.754
<v Speaker 3>I got to get Okay, you're really into it. I

0:37:14.794 --> 0:37:18.073
<v Speaker 3>have two quick things to add. One, ameliate your point

0:37:18.074 --> 0:37:20.913
<v Speaker 3>about online dating and how there was stigma about that

0:37:21.274 --> 0:37:25.354
<v Speaker 3>online dating still results in meeting in real life, like

0:37:25.394 --> 0:37:29.034
<v Speaker 3>there are not. I don't think anybody was advocating for

0:37:29.554 --> 0:37:33.194
<v Speaker 3>relationships only occurring online, even between actual people. There has

0:37:33.234 --> 0:37:35.074
<v Speaker 3>to be meeting in real life, and some people do

0:37:35.154 --> 0:37:37.874
<v Speaker 3>meet someone in real life and there's no chemistry. Two,

0:37:38.594 --> 0:37:41.674
<v Speaker 3>bridget Delaney's peace. Kind of the crux of it was,

0:37:42.514 --> 0:37:45.194
<v Speaker 3>what would you say if your child was in one

0:37:45.234 --> 0:37:46.554
<v Speaker 3>of those relationships, and how.

0:37:46.394 --> 0:37:48.394
<v Speaker 2>We're all going to have to do the ply correct

0:37:48.394 --> 0:37:49.874
<v Speaker 2>thing of saying no judgment.

0:37:50.154 --> 0:37:54.033
<v Speaker 3>And I agree that ultimately, if my Matilda in twenty

0:37:54.074 --> 0:37:56.953
<v Speaker 3>years time comes to me and says I'm in an

0:37:56.954 --> 0:38:00.354
<v Speaker 3>AI relationship, I do think good parenting is you let

0:38:00.434 --> 0:38:02.994
<v Speaker 3>kids make their own mistakes and date the wrong people,

0:38:03.074 --> 0:38:05.514
<v Speaker 3>even when it's not a person friends.

0:38:05.554 --> 0:38:08.553
<v Speaker 1>Before we go, you might even be cooking dinner while

0:38:08.554 --> 0:38:10.834
<v Speaker 1>you're listening to this, in which case, good job. I'm

0:38:10.834 --> 0:38:12.954
<v Speaker 1>already thinking about dinner because I like to plan my

0:38:12.994 --> 0:38:16.034
<v Speaker 1>meals ahead of time. There's been a big shift in

0:38:16.074 --> 0:38:18.634
<v Speaker 1>the time that people eat dinner, so I want to

0:38:18.674 --> 0:38:21.834
<v Speaker 1>ask you first, what time do you typically eat dinner? Holly?

0:38:22.234 --> 0:38:29.274
<v Speaker 2>Seven o'clock. Typically around seven o'clock, somewhere between six thirty

0:38:29.314 --> 0:38:29.634
<v Speaker 2>and eight.

0:38:30.434 --> 0:38:33.434
<v Speaker 3>I'm a creature of routine or habit. I am chos.

0:38:33.714 --> 0:38:36.754
<v Speaker 3>So why either eat dinner at five pm or nine.

0:38:36.594 --> 0:38:39.154
<v Speaker 1>Pm, depending on if you eat with your child or not.

0:38:39.314 --> 0:38:39.754
<v Speaker 1>Is that right?

0:38:39.994 --> 0:38:43.554
<v Speaker 3>Yes? But like it's always an extreme, it's never seven pm.

0:38:43.674 --> 0:38:46.994
<v Speaker 2>Ever, Well, when do you eat dinner? You know?

0:38:47.154 --> 0:38:50.754
<v Speaker 1>It's interesting, Thanks for asking, Holly. When I was growing up,

0:38:50.954 --> 0:38:53.194
<v Speaker 1>I always eat dinner at seven o'clock to coincide with

0:38:53.234 --> 0:38:56.234
<v Speaker 1>the ABC newsballs, which I'm assuming is not why you

0:38:56.274 --> 0:38:57.554
<v Speaker 1>always eat dinner at seven o'clock.

0:38:57.714 --> 0:39:00.274
<v Speaker 2>No, although I appreciate that. When I was growing up,

0:39:00.274 --> 0:39:02.754
<v Speaker 2>we always had dinner at six, England's like an earlier

0:39:03.194 --> 0:39:06.154
<v Speaker 2>eating place. And then during my I know, you haven't

0:39:06.194 --> 0:39:08.554
<v Speaker 2>asked for this much to eat. During the years that

0:39:08.634 --> 0:39:10.594
<v Speaker 2>my kids were little and we had to eat before bedtime,

0:39:10.674 --> 0:39:13.433
<v Speaker 2>they would eat around five. But if you're working, you're

0:39:13.434 --> 0:39:15.754
<v Speaker 2>not home now like, so it just depends. They would

0:39:15.754 --> 0:39:17.513
<v Speaker 2>eat around five, and we would eat after they went

0:39:17.554 --> 0:39:19.754
<v Speaker 2>to bed. But now we try and eat together and

0:39:20.074 --> 0:39:21.154
<v Speaker 2>that's where we've landed around.

0:39:21.154 --> 0:39:23.993
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, we typically eat around six thirty. But I'm

0:39:24.034 --> 0:39:26.074
<v Speaker 1>not going to lie around five. I do need a

0:39:26.074 --> 0:39:29.513
<v Speaker 1>sizable snack, even though I hear my grandmother's voice saying

0:39:29.714 --> 0:39:32.194
<v Speaker 1>we're when you're appetite in my head. The reason I'm

0:39:32.234 --> 0:39:34.393
<v Speaker 1>asking this because there's been a big cultural shift. A

0:39:34.474 --> 0:39:37.714
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty five RESI survey confirmed what I was already

0:39:37.714 --> 0:39:40.274
<v Speaker 1>feeling in the air, which is that people are now

0:39:40.314 --> 0:39:42.794
<v Speaker 1>eating dinner a lot earlier than they used to. So

0:39:42.834 --> 0:39:46.834
<v Speaker 1>apparently more people dined between five and six pm than

0:39:46.874 --> 0:39:49.994
<v Speaker 1>in the three hours between eight and eleven. Yeah, and

0:39:49.994 --> 0:39:52.033
<v Speaker 1>that was the first time that that had happened. There's

0:39:52.034 --> 0:39:54.513
<v Speaker 1>been this big shift. Why do you think that is?

0:39:54.794 --> 0:39:57.993
<v Speaker 3>Do you want my really cynical answer. I think it's

0:39:58.034 --> 0:40:00.913
<v Speaker 3>because we need time for our screens. So if we

0:40:00.954 --> 0:40:03.553
<v Speaker 3>eat between five and six, it gives us the rest

0:40:03.594 --> 0:40:07.553
<v Speaker 3>of the evening for our shows and our stories and

0:40:08.194 --> 0:40:11.674
<v Speaker 3>most importantly dessert. I think you need you need all

0:40:11.714 --> 0:40:12.434
<v Speaker 3>of that time.

0:40:13.634 --> 0:40:15.954
<v Speaker 2>I think it's because and we talked about this on

0:40:16.074 --> 0:40:19.714
<v Speaker 2>last Friday's show about dawn culture and how everybody's getting

0:40:19.794 --> 0:40:22.314
<v Speaker 2>up earlier. People are going to bed earlier too. Stats

0:40:22.394 --> 0:40:25.074
<v Speaker 2>show that, again Claire, who knows what stats, I'm just

0:40:25.154 --> 0:40:27.834
<v Speaker 2>pulling stacks out there, that people are going to bed

0:40:27.874 --> 0:40:32.114
<v Speaker 2>around nine o'clock and that's becoming a very desirable aspirational

0:40:32.194 --> 0:40:34.514
<v Speaker 2>time to go to bed, like at the early bedtime.

0:40:35.074 --> 0:40:37.074
<v Speaker 2>Not necessarily that they're doing it, but so they want

0:40:37.074 --> 0:40:39.433
<v Speaker 2>to eat earlier so they've got the time to digest it.

0:40:39.474 --> 0:40:43.114
<v Speaker 2>But it's so interesting because I was always an eight

0:40:43.114 --> 0:40:45.314
<v Speaker 2>o'clock If I was going out for dinner, I'd be

0:40:45.354 --> 0:40:50.594
<v Speaker 2>like a time eight o'clock reservation meet at seven seven thirty,

0:40:50.634 --> 0:40:53.834
<v Speaker 2>have a drink, go to dinner, and now with my girlfriends,

0:40:53.874 --> 0:40:57.354
<v Speaker 2>I'm like, six thirty is that too late? I feel

0:40:57.954 --> 0:41:00.794
<v Speaker 2>like we've really all shifted because no one wants to

0:41:00.794 --> 0:41:01.553
<v Speaker 2>stay out late.

0:41:01.714 --> 0:41:03.674
<v Speaker 1>Mia drew a line with me. I wanted to have

0:41:03.714 --> 0:41:05.954
<v Speaker 1>dinner at five pm recently, she told me that was

0:41:05.994 --> 0:41:08.433
<v Speaker 1>too early. My personal theories that I think there's a

0:41:08.434 --> 0:41:11.433
<v Speaker 1>bit of a health halo around eating earlier, which has

0:41:11.594 --> 0:41:14.394
<v Speaker 1>coincided with the rise of intermittent fasting as a trend.

0:41:14.394 --> 0:41:16.754
<v Speaker 1>Now the jury is out on whether intermittent fasting is

0:41:16.794 --> 0:41:19.274
<v Speaker 1>actually even good for you, but I think it's just

0:41:19.354 --> 0:41:22.554
<v Speaker 1>developed this sense of healthiness that you eat dinner.

0:41:22.754 --> 0:41:25.274
<v Speaker 2>And the sleep maxes, you know, the Brian Johnson's of

0:41:25.314 --> 0:41:26.594
<v Speaker 2>the world and stuff, the guy who is going to

0:41:26.674 --> 0:41:28.873
<v Speaker 2>live forever. He says, you've got to go to bed

0:41:28.914 --> 0:41:31.114
<v Speaker 2>on it. I mean, do not take advice from that guy,

0:41:31.154 --> 0:41:33.993
<v Speaker 2>but anyway, he might as well be AI. But there's

0:41:34.034 --> 0:41:35.674
<v Speaker 2>that you've got to go to bed on as empty

0:41:35.674 --> 0:41:38.354
<v Speaker 2>as stomach as you can, or the digestion keeps you

0:41:38.394 --> 0:41:39.714
<v Speaker 2>awake because it's so busy.

0:41:39.954 --> 0:41:42.514
<v Speaker 1>He needs Diary of the CEO. When you've got mother're

0:41:42.514 --> 0:41:42.873
<v Speaker 1>out loud.

0:41:45.154 --> 0:41:47.474
<v Speaker 2>That is all we have time for today. A massive

0:41:47.554 --> 0:41:49.873
<v Speaker 2>thank you to Claire Stevens for filling in for Jesse,

0:41:50.714 --> 0:41:53.274
<v Speaker 2>and to all of you for listening and maybe even watching.

0:41:53.314 --> 0:41:54.514
<v Speaker 2>Remember we're on YouTube.

0:41:54.674 --> 0:41:59.234
<v Speaker 3>On tomorrow's subscriber episode, we're going to unpack the latest

0:41:59.274 --> 0:42:03.114
<v Speaker 3>installment of Big Brother Australia, as well as touched on

0:42:03.154 --> 0:42:07.433
<v Speaker 3>the finale of Golden Bachelor and basically kind kind of

0:42:07.474 --> 0:42:11.114
<v Speaker 3>our algorithm theory of what makes reality TV work. In

0:42:11.154 --> 0:42:12.234
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty five.

0:42:12.594 --> 0:42:21.714
<v Speaker 2>Bye Mamma. Mia acknowledges the traditional owners of the land

0:42:21.754 --> 0:42:23.514
<v Speaker 2>on which we've recorded this podcast.