WEBVTT - The Email That Blew Up A Friendship

0:00:03.000 --> 0:00:06.240
<v Speaker 1>Hello and welcome, Welcome, Welcome to mom and Mia out loud.

0:00:06.240 --> 0:00:08.640
<v Speaker 1>It's what women are actually talking about on Monday, the

0:00:08.720 --> 0:00:12.120
<v Speaker 1>tenth of August. I'm Holly Waynwright, I'm m Vernon, I'm

0:00:12.119 --> 0:00:15.320
<v Speaker 1>Amelia Lester and here's what's on our agenda for today.

0:00:16.160 --> 0:00:19.400
<v Speaker 1>Robots have killed homework and I'm not happy about it.

0:00:20.120 --> 0:00:23.639
<v Speaker 2>Oh no, Plus, have you ever been betrayed by a

0:00:23.720 --> 0:00:25.760
<v Speaker 2>friend and what did you do about it?

0:00:26.000 --> 0:00:29.320
<v Speaker 3>And is the cozy life making you a bit depressed?

0:00:29.680 --> 0:00:33.320
<v Speaker 2>But first, M Vernon, in case you missed it, Zendeia

0:00:33.440 --> 0:00:38.080
<v Speaker 2>and Tom Holland have gone and married again, so we

0:00:38.159 --> 0:00:40.239
<v Speaker 2>knew they were married earlier this years, and Deya has

0:00:40.240 --> 0:00:44.080
<v Speaker 2>been wearing a wedding band on her ring finger. Tom

0:00:44.159 --> 0:00:47.560
<v Speaker 2>also referred to her as his wife during the Odyssey

0:00:47.640 --> 0:00:51.239
<v Speaker 2>press talk, and Law wrote the stylist said they that

0:00:51.320 --> 0:00:53.280
<v Speaker 2>you guys have missed it. It's already happened. The wedding's

0:00:53.280 --> 0:00:55.720
<v Speaker 2>already happened, That's what Laurache said. But now it's been

0:00:55.760 --> 0:00:58.520
<v Speaker 2>reported that a few weekends ago they actually had a

0:00:58.560 --> 0:01:02.960
<v Speaker 2>private wedding celebrat at Beaverbrook Hotel, which is a which

0:01:03.000 --> 0:01:06.679
<v Speaker 2>is a luxury country house hotel in Surrey, UK.

0:01:07.000 --> 0:01:08.920
<v Speaker 1>So they've had two secret weddings.

0:01:08.920 --> 0:01:11.800
<v Speaker 2>They've had two weddings. What I think has happened is

0:01:11.840 --> 0:01:15.039
<v Speaker 2>that they listened to our conversation where we said the

0:01:15.080 --> 0:01:18.119
<v Speaker 2>millennial wedding is over, and they were like, not yet,

0:01:18.640 --> 0:01:19.360
<v Speaker 2>we have some do.

0:01:19.880 --> 0:01:22.440
<v Speaker 3>There were some lavender sprigs in Mason Jarles at this

0:01:22.480 --> 0:01:25.720
<v Speaker 3>wedding celebration and other millennial wedding tropes.

0:01:25.880 --> 0:01:27.880
<v Speaker 1>No, because they're the King and Queen of gen Z,

0:01:28.000 --> 0:01:30.080
<v Speaker 1>aren't they those people? They said it.

0:01:30.080 --> 0:01:32.720
<v Speaker 2>It's been reported it was a private ceremony, still with

0:01:32.920 --> 0:01:34.640
<v Speaker 2>close family and friends.

0:01:35.040 --> 0:01:37.160
<v Speaker 1>So I so now there are two wedding dresses. I

0:01:37.160 --> 0:01:39.560
<v Speaker 1>haven't seen. It just seems selfish. I need to talk

0:01:39.600 --> 0:01:43.320
<v Speaker 1>about them though. Okay, So between them, between Spider Man

0:01:43.760 --> 0:01:46.520
<v Speaker 1>whatever it's called, Spider Man singy thingy, Brand New Day,

0:01:46.640 --> 0:01:51.160
<v Speaker 1>Brand New Day, and the Odyssey. Between them, they are

0:01:51.160 --> 0:01:53.840
<v Speaker 1>bringing in about three and a half billion dollars for

0:01:53.880 --> 0:01:55.040
<v Speaker 1>the box office this summer.

0:01:55.160 --> 0:01:58.040
<v Speaker 2>Oh my god, what couple do you relate them to

0:01:58.160 --> 0:01:59.080
<v Speaker 2>from your generation?

0:02:00.280 --> 0:02:03.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that even is one really because Madonna

0:02:03.920 --> 0:02:06.920
<v Speaker 1>and Champagne. But Madonna is never box office. I mean,

0:02:06.960 --> 0:02:09.800
<v Speaker 1>she was obviously like musical box office I guess so,

0:02:09.960 --> 0:02:13.000
<v Speaker 1>but no, because they're more sensible. In fact, they're very

0:02:13.680 --> 0:02:16.520
<v Speaker 1>gen z in that they seem like they have this

0:02:16.680 --> 0:02:21.200
<v Speaker 1>very healthy, respectful, friend based relationship and all that stuff.

0:02:21.480 --> 0:02:23.800
<v Speaker 1>But what is interesting is people are always saying movies

0:02:23.800 --> 0:02:26.639
<v Speaker 1>are dead, movies are dead, but they're clearly not dead.

0:02:26.639 --> 0:02:29.600
<v Speaker 1>If Sendaea's in them, if Zendea's in them, they are alive.

0:02:29.680 --> 0:02:32.440
<v Speaker 1>Those two. They talk about how movie stars are the

0:02:32.440 --> 0:02:35.480
<v Speaker 1>people who can open a movie, and they have opened

0:02:35.520 --> 0:02:37.640
<v Speaker 1>the two biggest movies of the year by a really

0:02:37.639 --> 0:02:38.120
<v Speaker 1>long way.

0:02:38.280 --> 0:02:40.720
<v Speaker 3>But what is also so GenZ about them is that

0:02:41.040 --> 0:02:46.440
<v Speaker 3>I saw photos of them grabbing coffee in London last week.

0:02:46.919 --> 0:02:49.280
<v Speaker 3>These are people bringing in, as you said, three and

0:02:49.280 --> 0:02:51.320
<v Speaker 3>a half billion dollars in the box office, and they

0:02:51.320 --> 0:02:54.600
<v Speaker 3>are living, by all accounts, pretty normal lives.

0:02:54.880 --> 0:02:57.400
<v Speaker 2>I think what works for them is that they've always

0:02:57.560 --> 0:03:01.360
<v Speaker 2>been or had this essence of being unbothered, like unbothered

0:03:01.440 --> 0:03:04.560
<v Speaker 2>about everything right from the get go. I feel like

0:03:04.880 --> 0:03:08.200
<v Speaker 2>when Zendeia was on Disney Channel in particular, she was

0:03:08.240 --> 0:03:10.800
<v Speaker 2>doing so many movies, so many press tours, trying to

0:03:10.800 --> 0:03:13.440
<v Speaker 2>push her celebrity esque and the minute she broke out

0:03:13.480 --> 0:03:16.600
<v Speaker 2>from Disney Channel and went into Hollywood. Like, during the

0:03:16.720 --> 0:03:19.640
<v Speaker 2>phase of her being in euphoria, she started to become

0:03:19.840 --> 0:03:22.720
<v Speaker 2>more and more quiet, and I think that's worked really

0:03:22.919 --> 0:03:23.520
<v Speaker 2>really well for.

0:03:23.639 --> 0:03:26.400
<v Speaker 3>Oh that's interesting. So basically, the more famous she's become,

0:03:26.600 --> 0:03:28.640
<v Speaker 3>the more quiet her persona is.

0:03:28.800 --> 0:03:31.280
<v Speaker 2>And I think she's bringing Tom Holland with her on

0:03:31.360 --> 0:03:32.000
<v Speaker 2>that journey.

0:03:32.280 --> 0:03:34.320
<v Speaker 1>You know what, though, you know how we talked on

0:03:34.360 --> 0:03:37.520
<v Speaker 1>the show a few weeks ago about how big movie

0:03:37.560 --> 0:03:41.640
<v Speaker 1>stars can be a hindrance to film and TV because

0:03:41.640 --> 0:03:45.080
<v Speaker 1>you're just watching Zendaya. I went to see The Odyssey

0:03:45.120 --> 0:03:48.680
<v Speaker 1>on Saturday at EM's instructions. Obviously very much for listening.

0:03:48.720 --> 0:03:50.600
<v Speaker 1>I sent your five years later at the text say

0:03:50.680 --> 0:03:53.600
<v Speaker 1>said something like, you were right, it's really good.

0:03:54.640 --> 0:03:58.280
<v Speaker 3>And then you crist And is onto something apparently so.

0:03:58.440 --> 0:04:00.680
<v Speaker 1>But the thing is, it's interesting sitting next to my

0:04:00.800 --> 0:04:03.840
<v Speaker 1>daughter who's sixteen, and all the way through she like,

0:04:04.120 --> 0:04:06.560
<v Speaker 1>no one ever calls Tom Holland by his actual name,

0:04:06.600 --> 0:04:09.120
<v Speaker 1>He's just Tom Holland, and she's just Sendeia and then

0:04:09.200 --> 0:04:12.280
<v Speaker 1>every movie star who came on, and there are famously

0:04:12.360 --> 0:04:15.400
<v Speaker 1>many many movie stars in that movie. Matilda would say

0:04:15.440 --> 0:04:18.000
<v Speaker 1>to me, is that person famous? And I'd be like Yes,

0:04:18.040 --> 0:04:21.480
<v Speaker 1>that's Shelley's there On. Yes that's Matt Damon. Yes that's

0:04:21.480 --> 0:04:26.760
<v Speaker 1>San Hathaway. Yes that's John Lagisimo, that's Robert Pattinson. And

0:04:26.839 --> 0:04:29.440
<v Speaker 1>I was just like that, It's true. The rail has

0:04:29.520 --> 0:04:33.480
<v Speaker 1>dropped even on a movie that big, that sensational, that amazing.

0:04:33.600 --> 0:04:38.119
<v Speaker 1>It's just Tom Holland's Tom Holland. Yeah for just bad.

0:04:38.520 --> 0:04:39.440
<v Speaker 1>I think it's fine.

0:04:39.520 --> 0:04:41.960
<v Speaker 2>I mean Tom Holland is always not worse than being

0:04:42.000 --> 0:04:45.160
<v Speaker 2>Tom Holland is that he's always a kid, like he's

0:04:45.200 --> 0:04:47.719
<v Speaker 2>never played an adult, grown up role. He's been in

0:04:47.800 --> 0:04:51.320
<v Speaker 2>Spider Man for years. He's one actor who's had the

0:04:51.320 --> 0:04:54.240
<v Speaker 2>most Spider Man movies made of him being Spider Man.

0:04:54.680 --> 0:04:56.880
<v Speaker 2>And since then he's done The Odyssey, He's done.

0:04:56.760 --> 0:04:59.360
<v Speaker 1>Like a few other roles. He's worked with Robert Pattison

0:04:59.440 --> 0:05:00.000
<v Speaker 1>for a very long time.

0:05:00.480 --> 0:05:02.760
<v Speaker 2>But he's always been a kid, or like a younger brother,

0:05:02.920 --> 0:05:04.000
<v Speaker 2>or like the little guy.

0:05:04.600 --> 0:05:08.040
<v Speaker 1>And I'm thinking, like he is going to be typecasted now.

0:05:08.040 --> 0:05:10.559
<v Speaker 2>Has always been the kid, and I'm interested to see

0:05:10.600 --> 0:05:14.360
<v Speaker 2>how he transitions from doing these roles like these like

0:05:14.880 --> 0:05:17.880
<v Speaker 2>boy from Queen's roles into being a proper adult role.

0:05:17.920 --> 0:05:20.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, there's been some think pieces about that, saying it's

0:05:20.080 --> 0:05:21.720
<v Speaker 1>time to put your big boy pats on.

0:05:21.760 --> 0:05:24.920
<v Speaker 3>The interesting thing is his wife, I think, is a

0:05:24.960 --> 0:05:27.680
<v Speaker 3>little bit less resistant to type casting. It seems to

0:05:27.720 --> 0:05:32.000
<v Speaker 3>me that what she's done so successfully is separate her

0:05:32.600 --> 0:05:35.719
<v Speaker 3>acting persona from who she is as a person, and

0:05:35.760 --> 0:05:37.880
<v Speaker 3>I'm thinking that on the odesty press to it. She

0:05:38.000 --> 0:05:42.600
<v Speaker 3>actually run into a little bit of controversy when her stylist,

0:05:42.640 --> 0:05:46.080
<v Speaker 3>who we've mentioned here today, law Roach, got in a

0:05:46.080 --> 0:05:50.160
<v Speaker 3>bit of hot water because he told press that one

0:05:50.240 --> 0:05:53.080
<v Speaker 3>of the dresses she wore had been put on a

0:05:53.120 --> 0:05:56.440
<v Speaker 3>private jet to go from the US to Europe or

0:05:56.440 --> 0:05:59.960
<v Speaker 3>maybe it was vice versa. And obviously the carbon footprint

0:06:00.080 --> 0:06:03.040
<v Speaker 3>of that dress is quite significant. But what was interesting

0:06:03.160 --> 0:06:06.760
<v Speaker 3>is and Diya didn't get any of that associated criticism.

0:06:06.880 --> 0:06:09.280
<v Speaker 3>It was understood that that was for a role, it

0:06:09.360 --> 0:06:12.640
<v Speaker 3>was for work. Law Roach made the final call on that,

0:06:12.800 --> 0:06:15.240
<v Speaker 3>and she didn't pick up any of the flag for it.

0:06:15.520 --> 0:06:20.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, she has that like cool edit similarly to Taylor Swift.

0:06:20.360 --> 0:06:22.800
<v Speaker 2>Where even Taylor Swift, I remember during the Ara's tour,

0:06:23.240 --> 0:06:26.680
<v Speaker 2>there was talks about her catching a private jet to

0:06:26.680 --> 0:06:29.159
<v Speaker 2>go from her airs tour in Tokyo to watch her

0:06:29.200 --> 0:06:31.119
<v Speaker 2>boyfriend play a game and then fly back.

0:06:31.440 --> 0:06:35.080
<v Speaker 3>It was the super Bowl, we should add, and.

0:06:34.960 --> 0:06:38.200
<v Speaker 2>I wasn't talk about it like she did get crap

0:06:38.320 --> 0:06:42.200
<v Speaker 2>for doing those private jet flights and people were tracking

0:06:42.240 --> 0:06:44.839
<v Speaker 2>each flight she was doing, but it never actually like

0:06:44.960 --> 0:06:46.560
<v Speaker 2>tainted her essence of celebrity.

0:06:46.600 --> 0:06:49.240
<v Speaker 3>I actually think she has two private jets, but people don't.

0:06:49.440 --> 0:06:51.760
<v Speaker 3>People don't necessarily associate that way because I.

0:06:51.680 --> 0:06:53.080
<v Speaker 1>Still want to go to a concert and they will

0:06:53.120 --> 0:06:55.560
<v Speaker 1>still listen to her music. There's what's most interesting to

0:06:55.600 --> 0:06:58.479
<v Speaker 1>me about Secret Wedding number two is that those two

0:06:58.520 --> 0:07:01.200
<v Speaker 1>have been on a red carpet NonStop for three months,

0:07:01.240 --> 0:07:05.119
<v Speaker 1>like every premiere in every country in the world, pretty

0:07:05.160 --> 0:07:10.320
<v Speaker 1>much every continent ever, increasingly ridiculous outfits for Zendea ever

0:07:10.400 --> 0:07:14.040
<v Speaker 1>increasingly are shucks adorability for Tom and don't you reckon

0:07:14.080 --> 0:07:16.160
<v Speaker 1>that when that press was all over as it is now,

0:07:16.280 --> 0:07:18.360
<v Speaker 1>you'd just want to put your rugs on. No, they

0:07:18.400 --> 0:07:20.800
<v Speaker 1>want to go and have a big web beaver Brook.

0:07:20.880 --> 0:07:24.679
<v Speaker 1>A beaver Brook in a massive win for both robots

0:07:24.720 --> 0:07:28.680
<v Speaker 1>and high school students. AI has killed homework for good.

0:07:31.240 --> 0:07:34.080
<v Speaker 1>I exaggerate, but only just It's been announced that in

0:07:34.160 --> 0:07:36.640
<v Speaker 1>New South Wales at home assignments are going to be

0:07:36.720 --> 0:07:42.000
<v Speaker 1>broadly banned for HSC consideration because everyone knows that the

0:07:42.080 --> 0:07:45.160
<v Speaker 1>kids are not doing them themselves. They are getting a

0:07:45.160 --> 0:07:49.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of help from their mates chat jem claude. Other

0:07:49.560 --> 0:07:52.800
<v Speaker 1>states and territories are doing similar things. Victoria and Queensland

0:07:52.800 --> 0:07:56.000
<v Speaker 1>are both pushing closed book exams and limited screen time

0:07:56.160 --> 0:08:01.400
<v Speaker 1>in schools. Controlled classroom environments featuring computer screen monitoring and

0:08:01.520 --> 0:08:07.000
<v Speaker 1>network firewalls are hot right now. Work firewalls so that

0:08:07.040 --> 0:08:10.520
<v Speaker 1>you can't be in class and using your chat. All

0:08:10.560 --> 0:08:13.160
<v Speaker 1>around the world, this is happening too. In Denmark, for example,

0:08:13.200 --> 0:08:17.360
<v Speaker 1>high school students have to orally defend their work. The

0:08:17.400 --> 0:08:19.600
<v Speaker 1>reason I'm pronouncing it like that, Amelia, is because on

0:08:19.680 --> 0:08:23.440
<v Speaker 1>Friday I got in trouble from Mia for saying orally

0:08:23.480 --> 0:08:26.480
<v Speaker 1>wrong wrong again.

0:08:26.600 --> 0:08:28.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it sounded like you were saying orally.

0:08:29.040 --> 0:08:32.559
<v Speaker 1>Orally say it so orally really?

0:08:33.160 --> 0:08:35.200
<v Speaker 3>Orally is hearing orally is speaking?

0:08:35.280 --> 0:08:38.240
<v Speaker 1>Yes, I know, but it's I think I'm blaming my accent,

0:08:38.280 --> 0:08:42.400
<v Speaker 1>but sure I get it. Orally defending any work like

0:08:42.440 --> 0:08:44.880
<v Speaker 1>an essay completed at home, so you can't just hand

0:08:44.880 --> 0:08:46.920
<v Speaker 1>it in. You have to like stand up and defend

0:08:46.920 --> 0:08:50.040
<v Speaker 1>and explain all these things. Teachers are also getting better

0:08:50.080 --> 0:08:52.920
<v Speaker 1>and better catching the kids out. Last week, this video

0:08:52.960 --> 0:08:56.680
<v Speaker 1>went kind of viral from an American professor. Now, he

0:08:56.880 --> 0:08:59.920
<v Speaker 1>said that what he's been doing is laying little trap

0:09:00.320 --> 0:09:03.840
<v Speaker 1>for his students. So in the bit you're about to hear, now,

0:09:03.960 --> 0:09:06.400
<v Speaker 1>he's going to tell you the result of what he's

0:09:06.440 --> 0:09:08.440
<v Speaker 1>been doing is he'll set out the instructions for an

0:09:08.559 --> 0:09:13.360
<v Speaker 1>essay and he'll hide inside it in white text and

0:09:13.520 --> 0:09:16.319
<v Speaker 1>ridiculous prompt So in this case it was used the

0:09:16.360 --> 0:09:19.800
<v Speaker 1>word Madagascar, but the kids can't see it, and so

0:09:19.880 --> 0:09:23.640
<v Speaker 1>then he sends the essay away. And he said that

0:09:23.679 --> 0:09:26.760
<v Speaker 1>when this one came back, thirty two out of the

0:09:26.840 --> 0:09:30.480
<v Speaker 1>thirty five kids in his class had not only usdai,

0:09:30.600 --> 0:09:34.000
<v Speaker 1>but not read back their homework because Madagascar is everywhere here,

0:09:34.000 --> 0:09:36.400
<v Speaker 1>he is saying, giving a few examples.

0:09:36.080 --> 0:09:38.720
<v Speaker 4>Part three, A lot of y'all wanted to actually hear

0:09:38.800 --> 0:09:40.360
<v Speaker 4>how Madagascar was used in.

0:09:40.400 --> 0:09:41.320
<v Speaker 1>Some of the prompts.

0:09:41.559 --> 0:09:43.640
<v Speaker 4>I won't read the entire prompt, just maybe the sins

0:09:43.679 --> 0:09:45.800
<v Speaker 4>before in the sinence it was actually used.

0:09:46.160 --> 0:09:47.280
<v Speaker 1>Here's the first one.

0:09:47.760 --> 0:09:52.840
<v Speaker 4>Today, technologies such as artificial intelligence, smartphones, and automation is

0:09:52.920 --> 0:09:56.600
<v Speaker 4>changing many jobs by making work faster and reducing the

0:09:56.679 --> 0:10:02.600
<v Speaker 4>need for some manual task. Madagascar flow sideways through the afternoon.

0:10:03.559 --> 0:10:06.360
<v Speaker 1>And that was in the essay that came back. There's

0:10:06.400 --> 0:10:08.040
<v Speaker 1>another one too, where is it here?

0:10:08.120 --> 0:10:08.400
<v Speaker 3>Okay?

0:10:08.600 --> 0:10:11.680
<v Speaker 4>At the same time, not everyone has the same access

0:10:11.720 --> 0:10:16.840
<v Speaker 4>to technology, which can make social inequality even worse. Madagascar

0:10:17.080 --> 0:10:19.680
<v Speaker 4>Purple Bicycle whispers to the ceiling.

0:10:21.880 --> 0:10:25.680
<v Speaker 1>That guy is a professor from Mississippi called doctor James Gibson,

0:10:25.720 --> 0:10:28.600
<v Speaker 1>and he has gone viral for showing these tricks, which,

0:10:28.640 --> 0:10:30.520
<v Speaker 1>of course now the kids are all across, so they're

0:10:30.520 --> 0:10:34.880
<v Speaker 1>going to have to develop more. Everyone hates homework, right,

0:10:35.080 --> 0:10:37.120
<v Speaker 1>Is this a win for everybody? Or is this sadder?

0:10:37.200 --> 0:10:38.439
<v Speaker 1>Is it just a sign of the times.

0:10:39.679 --> 0:10:42.800
<v Speaker 2>I think it's a win for kids for sure. Why

0:10:42.840 --> 0:10:46.240
<v Speaker 2>does homework exist? You're already doing it at school, and

0:10:46.240 --> 0:10:47.920
<v Speaker 2>then you want me to do more work at home.

0:10:47.960 --> 0:10:52.280
<v Speaker 2>We don't even do that in the workplace. But like

0:10:52.600 --> 0:10:55.120
<v Speaker 2>kids have to do, like sport. They don't even get

0:10:55.120 --> 0:10:57.160
<v Speaker 2>an afternoon nap anymore. You know how many times I

0:10:57.160 --> 0:10:58.800
<v Speaker 2>would have loved an afternoon nap when I was in

0:10:58.880 --> 0:11:01.280
<v Speaker 2>high school. The fact that these kids don't have to

0:11:01.320 --> 0:11:04.040
<v Speaker 2>do homework anymore, I think is a whim for society.

0:11:04.120 --> 0:11:06.600
<v Speaker 1>Well, because assignments are part of the school, right, So

0:11:06.640 --> 0:11:08.680
<v Speaker 1>when you're doing directsc you still have to do exams,

0:11:08.720 --> 0:11:11.920
<v Speaker 1>but you're doing at home assignments which might be deeper work,

0:11:12.000 --> 0:11:14.960
<v Speaker 1>more creative work, like over a long period of time,

0:11:15.000 --> 0:11:16.880
<v Speaker 1>putting together a lot of research information.

0:11:17.480 --> 0:11:19.599
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I think broadly speaking, what we're seeing is

0:11:19.640 --> 0:11:23.120
<v Speaker 3>a big correction from the last two decades of what

0:11:23.160 --> 0:11:27.160
<v Speaker 3>was happening in Australian schools. Two decades ago, Kevin Rudd said,

0:11:27.960 --> 0:11:31.160
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to make sure personally that every high school

0:11:31.160 --> 0:11:33.840
<v Speaker 3>student in Australia between the years of nine and twelve

0:11:34.200 --> 0:11:37.000
<v Speaker 3>is going to get a laptop. And everyone at the

0:11:37.040 --> 0:11:39.080
<v Speaker 3>time thought that was so great, and it was the

0:11:39.160 --> 0:11:43.600
<v Speaker 3>digital revolution. Remember that phrase information super highway, all of

0:11:43.600 --> 0:11:46.040
<v Speaker 3>these phrases that we do not use anymore because we've

0:11:46.040 --> 0:11:48.440
<v Speaker 3>realized it's not, in fact a super highway. It's more

0:11:48.480 --> 0:11:52.199
<v Speaker 3>like a pothold road to nowhere. So then everyone got

0:11:52.240 --> 0:11:55.719
<v Speaker 3>the laptops. Then they got to university, and then their

0:11:55.760 --> 0:11:59.839
<v Speaker 3>professors there realized that they were behind where they should be.

0:12:00.760 --> 0:12:02.800
<v Speaker 3>And now we're trying to sort of have the pendulum

0:12:02.800 --> 0:12:04.760
<v Speaker 3>swing back in the other direction. There's a word for

0:12:04.840 --> 0:12:08.080
<v Speaker 3>what you're describing here, hollywhich is descreening. So a lot

0:12:08.080 --> 0:12:12.080
<v Speaker 3>of Australian schools are consciously figuring out ways to make

0:12:12.120 --> 0:12:15.800
<v Speaker 3>sure that screens are not used in the classroom. And

0:12:15.840 --> 0:12:18.000
<v Speaker 3>part of this is we've also realized in the ensuing

0:12:18.080 --> 0:12:20.520
<v Speaker 3>years that the actual act of writing things down with

0:12:20.600 --> 0:12:25.120
<v Speaker 3>a pen and paper can aid in learning and internalizing knowledge.

0:12:25.160 --> 0:12:28.439
<v Speaker 3>If you're just typing something, you're not getting the knowledge

0:12:28.440 --> 0:12:30.520
<v Speaker 3>imprinted on your head in the same way as when

0:12:30.559 --> 0:12:33.160
<v Speaker 3>you actually write something with pen and paper.

0:12:32.840 --> 0:12:35.080
<v Speaker 1>And if you're just copying and pasting it from chat

0:12:35.080 --> 0:12:38.760
<v Speaker 1>GPT without checking that it doesn't say mad doing basketball,

0:12:38.840 --> 0:12:41.280
<v Speaker 1>that you're not learning anything at that they're not even

0:12:41.320 --> 0:12:44.120
<v Speaker 1>reading the antwers before they admit. It's like a whole

0:12:44.880 --> 0:12:46.720
<v Speaker 1>it is. We have a lot of teachers who listen

0:12:46.720 --> 0:12:49.120
<v Speaker 1>to out loud and I my heart goes out to

0:12:49.160 --> 0:12:51.800
<v Speaker 1>them right because as if it's not hard enough, we're

0:12:51.800 --> 0:12:54.000
<v Speaker 1>always talking about all the extra things that are piled

0:12:54.040 --> 0:12:56.920
<v Speaker 1>on teachers in terms of looking after kids social and

0:12:56.960 --> 0:12:59.160
<v Speaker 1>mental well being as well as their education and all

0:12:59.160 --> 0:13:02.440
<v Speaker 1>these things. And now it's also you have to be

0:13:02.520 --> 0:13:05.120
<v Speaker 1>wilier than a fox to try and trip them up

0:13:05.720 --> 0:13:10.320
<v Speaker 1>on AI use, so it feels like you're just always

0:13:10.400 --> 0:13:13.600
<v Speaker 1>running to catch up, whereas we any parent of kids

0:13:13.640 --> 0:13:16.240
<v Speaker 1>who are old enough to have access to technology knows

0:13:16.640 --> 0:13:18.920
<v Speaker 1>they are streets ahead of us always.

0:13:19.040 --> 0:13:19.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:13:19.480 --> 0:13:21.959
<v Speaker 1>Right, So you think that you're being really cool and

0:13:22.000 --> 0:13:24.840
<v Speaker 1>you've got your screen time limits on there and you've

0:13:24.880 --> 0:13:27.480
<v Speaker 1>got all that kind of thing, but they always find

0:13:27.520 --> 0:13:28.400
<v Speaker 1>a way around it.

0:13:28.400 --> 0:13:32.520
<v Speaker 2>It's almost embarrassing on how much we forget that kids

0:13:32.559 --> 0:13:36.960
<v Speaker 2>are so so smart. I remember when I was in

0:13:37.080 --> 0:13:39.280
<v Speaker 2>year six, which would have been two thousand and eight,

0:13:39.480 --> 0:13:42.720
<v Speaker 2>we had two police officers come in for assembly and

0:13:42.760 --> 0:13:46.720
<v Speaker 2>they were talking about the dangers of Facebook and MySpace,

0:13:47.480 --> 0:13:51.200
<v Speaker 2>and kids were laughing because it was stuff that we

0:13:51.400 --> 0:13:54.000
<v Speaker 2>already knew, but we knew it was stuff that our

0:13:54.120 --> 0:13:54.920
<v Speaker 2>parents didn't know.

0:13:55.000 --> 0:13:56.480
<v Speaker 1>Like every kid had.

0:13:56.320 --> 0:13:59.559
<v Speaker 2>Like a Facebook profile on MySpace page that they hid

0:13:59.600 --> 0:14:02.720
<v Speaker 2>from their And it went on with like being on

0:14:02.800 --> 0:14:06.280
<v Speaker 2>a egle and talking to strangers online, like every person

0:14:06.360 --> 0:14:10.160
<v Speaker 2>knew how to use technology, and we were years ahead

0:14:10.360 --> 0:14:12.520
<v Speaker 2>of our parents and trying to catch up even with

0:14:12.559 --> 0:14:14.480
<v Speaker 2>the social media band. I know so many kids who

0:14:14.480 --> 0:14:17.760
<v Speaker 2>still have social media, Like it's almost embarrassing on how

0:14:17.800 --> 0:14:20.440
<v Speaker 2>we don't we always forget that kids are so so

0:14:20.520 --> 0:14:22.880
<v Speaker 2>smart and so ahead of the curve, and when we

0:14:22.960 --> 0:14:26.360
<v Speaker 2>implement these new processes for AI and things like that,

0:14:26.400 --> 0:14:29.080
<v Speaker 2>we're always doing it from an adult perspective, where it's like,

0:14:29.120 --> 0:14:31.160
<v Speaker 2>how do we use AI? How do we be safe

0:14:31.160 --> 0:14:33.600
<v Speaker 2>on AI? Forgetting that kids who were doing it probably

0:14:33.640 --> 0:14:34.920
<v Speaker 2>a few years before us.

0:14:35.320 --> 0:14:37.120
<v Speaker 1>Well, that's interesting. I'd love to know what you think

0:14:37.160 --> 0:14:40.480
<v Speaker 1>about that, Amelia, because it's like, to me, in a way,

0:14:40.480 --> 0:14:43.720
<v Speaker 1>this seems quite quick, Like it feels almost as if

0:14:43.840 --> 0:14:46.440
<v Speaker 1>education systems in Australia and around the world are being

0:14:46.520 --> 0:14:50.320
<v Speaker 1>quite reactive, quite fast on cracking down on this because

0:14:50.560 --> 0:14:53.160
<v Speaker 1>for a lot of people, unless it's your industry, they're

0:14:53.200 --> 0:14:55.400
<v Speaker 1>only just figuring out what AI can do, and we're

0:14:55.440 --> 0:14:57.520
<v Speaker 1>and are only just learning now, Oh, they can write

0:14:57.560 --> 0:14:59.640
<v Speaker 1>your essay for you, they can do interpret your but

0:15:00.000 --> 0:15:03.760
<v Speaker 1>we're only just going, oh, that's interesting. So it does

0:15:03.840 --> 0:15:07.400
<v Speaker 1>feel like this reactivity is working well. But then isn't

0:15:07.400 --> 0:15:09.920
<v Speaker 1>it a bit unfair, Amelia, because not all kids perform

0:15:10.000 --> 0:15:12.200
<v Speaker 1>really well in exams. For lots of people, kids who

0:15:12.200 --> 0:15:15.560
<v Speaker 1>are more creative or less sort of conventionally knowledge based

0:15:15.920 --> 0:15:18.400
<v Speaker 1>assignment work is so much better for them, and that's

0:15:18.920 --> 0:15:20.360
<v Speaker 1>just going to go and it's going to be back

0:15:20.400 --> 0:15:24.040
<v Speaker 1>to books, exams, closed rooms, pens and paper. Is that

0:15:24.080 --> 0:15:24.600
<v Speaker 1>a good thing?

0:15:24.800 --> 0:15:26.680
<v Speaker 3>You're just on the quick point. I think part of

0:15:26.720 --> 0:15:29.800
<v Speaker 3>the reason why the education system is trying to get

0:15:29.880 --> 0:15:32.640
<v Speaker 3>on this so quickly is that there's a sense that

0:15:33.000 --> 0:15:36.760
<v Speaker 3>social media society as a whole drop the ball for kids. Yes,

0:15:37.120 --> 0:15:40.360
<v Speaker 3>we did not understand quickly enough the damage that it

0:15:40.400 --> 0:15:43.080
<v Speaker 3>did to kids' brains, and things like the social media

0:15:43.120 --> 0:15:46.320
<v Speaker 3>band have only been so effective, in fact mostly ineffective.

0:15:46.400 --> 0:15:49.440
<v Speaker 3>So I think as a society we feel determined not

0:15:49.600 --> 0:15:52.760
<v Speaker 3>to let that happen with AI. On the fairness point,

0:15:52.760 --> 0:15:55.560
<v Speaker 3>I think that's a great point. And I also think

0:15:55.760 --> 0:15:59.520
<v Speaker 3>kids look around and they see everyone else using AI,

0:16:00.160 --> 0:16:02.120
<v Speaker 3>and there's a sense of rules for me and not

0:16:02.240 --> 0:16:04.480
<v Speaker 3>for these. So just today there was this article in

0:16:04.520 --> 0:16:09.160
<v Speaker 3>the nine newspapers about how Kmart is using AI now

0:16:09.640 --> 0:16:12.360
<v Speaker 3>to hire holiday casuals. This is not by any means

0:16:12.360 --> 0:16:15.640
<v Speaker 3>restricted to Kmart, Woolworths, Bunning's Conscious. These are all companies

0:16:15.680 --> 0:16:18.720
<v Speaker 3>that are now using AI in hiring. My husband actually

0:16:18.720 --> 0:16:21.120
<v Speaker 3>did an interview on AI recently and it was the

0:16:21.160 --> 0:16:24.000
<v Speaker 3>weirdest thing he had to dress up in a shirt

0:16:24.160 --> 0:16:27.120
<v Speaker 3>and a tie for this AI interview, and I heard

0:16:27.160 --> 0:16:29.800
<v Speaker 3>him doing it in the other room, and there was

0:16:29.840 --> 0:16:32.480
<v Speaker 3>just there'd just be a period of silence, and then

0:16:32.480 --> 0:16:35.160
<v Speaker 3>he would answer the question because the AI would give

0:16:35.240 --> 0:16:37.640
<v Speaker 3>him a prompt, and then he would have to speak

0:16:37.640 --> 0:16:40.200
<v Speaker 3>to the AI as if it was a human. There

0:16:40.240 --> 0:16:43.920
<v Speaker 3>was something very sort of almost humiliating about that.

0:16:44.080 --> 0:16:47.960
<v Speaker 1>Oh my god, like trying to impress because I'm not

0:16:48.040 --> 0:16:52.040
<v Speaker 1>a human entity, and the I don't want to sound

0:16:52.080 --> 0:16:53.960
<v Speaker 1>like I'm clutching my pearls like a nana. But the

0:16:54.040 --> 0:16:56.360
<v Speaker 1>idea of all the things you would learn if you

0:16:56.360 --> 0:16:59.080
<v Speaker 1>were sitting across the table from your husband, from his

0:16:59.160 --> 0:17:01.240
<v Speaker 1>body language, from the way he talks, and the way

0:17:01.280 --> 0:17:04.439
<v Speaker 1>he presents, whether he's smiling, whether he's not just gone,

0:17:04.520 --> 0:17:05.880
<v Speaker 1>that's exactly frightening.

0:17:06.119 --> 0:17:08.480
<v Speaker 3>And look, with this came out interview that the nine

0:17:08.520 --> 0:17:11.480
<v Speaker 3>newspapers wrote about today, the AI bot says at the start,

0:17:11.800 --> 0:17:15.000
<v Speaker 3>we'll ask you five thought provoking questions that will reveal

0:17:15.040 --> 0:17:18.600
<v Speaker 3>your strengths and help you identify areas for growth. And

0:17:18.640 --> 0:17:22.000
<v Speaker 3>then apparently it says you're not allowed to use AI

0:17:22.119 --> 0:17:24.399
<v Speaker 3>for your responses, which first of all, just feels like

0:17:24.440 --> 0:17:27.880
<v Speaker 3>a very clear power imbalance between employer and would be employee.

0:17:28.119 --> 0:17:31.600
<v Speaker 3>And then after the interview you were emailed some areas

0:17:31.600 --> 0:17:35.600
<v Speaker 3>for improvement. So the AI emailed this journalist and said, look,

0:17:35.640 --> 0:17:39.040
<v Speaker 3>you seem like you're very trustworthy on the plus side.

0:17:39.520 --> 0:17:41.880
<v Speaker 3>On the con side, you seem a bit bossy.

0:17:42.320 --> 0:17:45.320
<v Speaker 1>Oh the robot's telling me I'm boss.

0:17:45.520 --> 0:17:47.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, not in so many words. It was phrase more

0:17:47.280 --> 0:17:50.520
<v Speaker 3>tactfully than that. But I don't want the AI telling

0:17:50.520 --> 0:17:51.480
<v Speaker 3>me what's wrong with me.

0:17:51.800 --> 0:17:55.520
<v Speaker 1>I've got commissions to do that, Amelia. I'm trying, we

0:17:55.600 --> 0:17:58.080
<v Speaker 1>try really hard on this show to remain positive or

0:17:58.080 --> 0:17:58.520
<v Speaker 1>not beaten.

0:17:58.560 --> 0:17:59.480
<v Speaker 3>Now I just want to.

0:17:59.400 --> 0:18:01.760
<v Speaker 1>Walk out of the store on the PUSA.

0:18:01.880 --> 0:18:03.960
<v Speaker 3>I do think that just to bring it back to

0:18:04.000 --> 0:18:06.960
<v Speaker 3>that idea that we are not going to as a society,

0:18:07.080 --> 0:18:10.480
<v Speaker 3>let what social media did your kids happen to? This

0:18:10.640 --> 0:18:12.879
<v Speaker 3>next generation of Jena so interesting.

0:18:13.119 --> 0:18:14.800
<v Speaker 1>I have one complaint, which is why I said that

0:18:15.000 --> 0:18:17.280
<v Speaker 1>in my throwaway thing about this that I'm unhappy, and

0:18:17.320 --> 0:18:21.480
<v Speaker 1>that's that we need homework to stop the kids from

0:18:21.480 --> 0:18:23.919
<v Speaker 1>just being on TikTok and video games at all times.

0:18:26.440 --> 0:18:30.200
<v Speaker 1>If you do away with that homework, now my kids

0:18:30.200 --> 0:18:35.440
<v Speaker 1>are just unfettered into the algorithms that have been set

0:18:35.480 --> 0:18:38.199
<v Speaker 1>for them by other robots in other places. So I'm like,

0:18:38.560 --> 0:18:41.480
<v Speaker 1>there is no escape. Please bring back.

0:18:41.280 --> 0:18:46.240
<v Speaker 3>Homework after the break, grab a cup of tea, snuggle

0:18:46.320 --> 0:18:49.520
<v Speaker 3>up under a crochet blanket, and let's figure out if

0:18:49.560 --> 0:18:53.800
<v Speaker 3>there's anything wrong with just wanting to be cozy. Okay.

0:18:53.880 --> 0:18:57.080
<v Speaker 3>On Saturday night, I went out with a friend just

0:18:57.080 --> 0:18:59.639
<v Speaker 3>for a quiet drink at the pub and we were

0:18:59.680 --> 0:19:01.720
<v Speaker 3>sitting in I love a quiet drinking.

0:19:02.000 --> 0:19:03.080
<v Speaker 1>I was so great for you.

0:19:04.920 --> 0:19:08.280
<v Speaker 3>We meditate thirty, which felt rather daring for me, and

0:19:09.200 --> 0:19:12.520
<v Speaker 3>across the courtyard we spied a group of young women

0:19:12.800 --> 0:19:15.720
<v Speaker 3>who must have been no older than maybe twenty twenty one,

0:19:16.440 --> 0:19:20.240
<v Speaker 3>and they were huddled over a game of cards. My

0:19:20.359 --> 0:19:23.840
<v Speaker 3>first instinct when I saw them was that looks incredibly cozy.

0:19:24.240 --> 0:19:27.200
<v Speaker 3>But then my friend, who had a wilder and more

0:19:27.240 --> 0:19:30.480
<v Speaker 3>adventurous youth than I did, said she felt sad because

0:19:30.480 --> 0:19:33.120
<v Speaker 3>she said they should be out making mistakes, they shouldn't

0:19:33.160 --> 0:19:37.359
<v Speaker 3>be just playing cards together. So this is the cult

0:19:37.400 --> 0:19:39.760
<v Speaker 3>of cozy in action. I've been thinking about this cult

0:19:39.760 --> 0:19:42.679
<v Speaker 3>of cozy lately because there's been this spate of articles

0:19:42.880 --> 0:19:48.280
<v Speaker 3>about how young people, particularly after COVID are prioritizing their

0:19:48.320 --> 0:19:51.600
<v Speaker 3>well being and their happiness in a way that other

0:19:51.720 --> 0:19:54.240
<v Speaker 3>generations such as mine and Holly did not. We didn't

0:19:54.240 --> 0:20:00.679
<v Speaker 3>prioritize well being in happiness, no hangovers. You're doing fewer

0:20:00.720 --> 0:20:03.760
<v Speaker 3>recreational drugs, they're drinking less, they're having less sex, and

0:20:03.800 --> 0:20:08.360
<v Speaker 3>instead they're embracing creative, wholesome, tactile activities. The New York

0:20:08.400 --> 0:20:12.600
<v Speaker 3>Times called it hobby maxing or hobby hobby amory. Another

0:20:12.720 --> 0:20:14.920
<v Speaker 3>term for it is having a side quest. I think

0:20:14.960 --> 0:20:17.480
<v Speaker 3>it brings a little like whimsy to your life, which

0:20:17.480 --> 0:20:19.760
<v Speaker 3>has nothing to do with your job or anything like that.

0:20:20.400 --> 0:20:22.439
<v Speaker 3>The New York Times says, though, that there is a

0:20:22.560 --> 0:20:25.680
<v Speaker 3>dark side to this, which is that, okay, fine, you're

0:20:25.720 --> 0:20:29.439
<v Speaker 3>in great health. You're not vomiting into toilets, which Holly

0:20:29.520 --> 0:20:32.000
<v Speaker 3>and I may or may not have done. You are

0:20:32.040 --> 0:20:36.800
<v Speaker 3>instead pursuing these hobbies at the expense of romantic relationships.

0:20:37.359 --> 0:20:40.960
<v Speaker 3>In fact, get at your pearls, Holly, clutch them because

0:20:41.000 --> 0:20:43.760
<v Speaker 3>some of them aren't dating at all. Frum gen Zis

0:20:43.760 --> 0:20:45.720
<v Speaker 3>are just saying I just want to crochet, I'm not

0:20:45.800 --> 0:20:48.200
<v Speaker 3>interested in dating. Are we okay with this? And m

0:20:48.480 --> 0:20:49.639
<v Speaker 3>what is your side quest.

0:20:49.800 --> 0:20:52.960
<v Speaker 2>Oh, my side quest right now is I'm learning a

0:20:53.000 --> 0:20:54.520
<v Speaker 2>lot about wines.

0:20:54.400 --> 0:20:57.320
<v Speaker 1>Which I don't think young people would think that's something cool.

0:20:57.480 --> 0:20:58.600
<v Speaker 3>No, but that is cozy.

0:20:58.760 --> 0:21:01.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, because I Holly, I do prioritized hangovers as well.

0:21:01.520 --> 0:21:03.640
<v Speaker 2>I thought, give it like a more elevator.

0:21:03.720 --> 0:21:05.560
<v Speaker 3>You like getting into your sideways.

0:21:05.920 --> 0:21:08.960
<v Speaker 2>I'm going into wine bars where like they can educate me.

0:21:08.960 --> 0:21:10.800
<v Speaker 1>On the wine that I drink. This is a very

0:21:11.000 --> 0:21:14.919
<v Speaker 1>thirty This is because you've turned I turned thirty doing that.

0:21:15.000 --> 0:21:16.200
<v Speaker 1>I saw a thing recently.

0:21:16.240 --> 0:21:16.639
<v Speaker 3>I won't.

0:21:17.320 --> 0:21:18.919
<v Speaker 1>I will get all the stats wrong if I quote it.

0:21:18.960 --> 0:21:22.120
<v Speaker 1>So I shan't but that young people aren't drinking wine right,

0:21:22.480 --> 0:21:25.760
<v Speaker 1>and that the wine industry is panicking. But they just

0:21:25.760 --> 0:21:30.439
<v Speaker 1>need patience. The people thirty and suddenly be like that

0:21:30.920 --> 0:21:31.720
<v Speaker 1>someone with the skin.

0:21:32.880 --> 0:21:33.200
<v Speaker 3>Fine.

0:21:34.640 --> 0:21:38.080
<v Speaker 2>There are two reasons I think why having a hobby

0:21:38.200 --> 0:21:42.000
<v Speaker 2>is better than having a boyfriend. The number one reason

0:21:42.080 --> 0:21:45.040
<v Speaker 2>is that hobbies will always be there, and hobbies always

0:21:45.080 --> 0:21:48.080
<v Speaker 2>look good in an Instagram post. So I do understand

0:21:48.119 --> 0:21:52.359
<v Speaker 2>why young people are choosing that over romantic relationships. But

0:21:52.440 --> 0:21:54.320
<v Speaker 2>I also want to bring up what your friend said,

0:21:54.920 --> 0:21:58.760
<v Speaker 2>which is people should go out and make mistakes. Why

0:21:58.480 --> 0:22:01.040
<v Speaker 2>why do all the people want to always make mistakes.

0:22:01.080 --> 0:22:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Why do they always want us?

0:22:02.240 --> 0:22:05.440
<v Speaker 2>There's so many thing pieces about why people people are panicking.

0:22:05.720 --> 0:22:07.800
<v Speaker 2>The young people aren't having sex anymore, and.

0:22:07.960 --> 0:22:10.560
<v Speaker 3>Let me explain why. So when we were having this

0:22:10.680 --> 0:22:14.000
<v Speaker 3>chat on Saturday, I said that looks cozy. She said

0:22:14.000 --> 0:22:17.920
<v Speaker 3>they should be making mistakes. But she had at first said, oh,

0:22:17.960 --> 0:22:20.520
<v Speaker 3>that's so cute, because that's what me and my boyfriend do.

0:22:20.680 --> 0:22:23.240
<v Speaker 3>Now they are both in their forties and this is

0:22:23.240 --> 0:22:26.280
<v Speaker 3>what they do. They play cards together. And I think

0:22:26.320 --> 0:22:28.440
<v Speaker 3>that's fine for them. But the point is you had

0:22:28.440 --> 0:22:30.480
<v Speaker 3>the rest of your life to play cards together. I

0:22:30.520 --> 0:22:32.800
<v Speaker 3>think that's the argument as to why the young people

0:22:32.840 --> 0:22:34.280
<v Speaker 3>should not be playing cards.

0:22:34.720 --> 0:22:36.840
<v Speaker 1>It's really interesting, it's so fun.

0:22:36.920 --> 0:22:40.280
<v Speaker 2>Like when I in my early twenties, I was very

0:22:40.359 --> 0:22:44.320
<v Speaker 2>much like, go out every night, get drunk, make mistakes,

0:22:44.359 --> 0:22:46.159
<v Speaker 2>do all of that. And then COVID happened when I

0:22:46.200 --> 0:22:49.000
<v Speaker 2>was around twenty four to twenty five, and then since that,

0:22:49.400 --> 0:22:51.959
<v Speaker 2>I've literally been only doing hobbies like that.

0:22:52.000 --> 0:22:52.920
<v Speaker 1>Life is gone.

0:22:53.000 --> 0:22:54.840
<v Speaker 2>So I think about with the young people who are

0:22:54.880 --> 0:22:57.119
<v Speaker 2>younger than me, who might be in their mid twenties.

0:22:57.160 --> 0:23:00.480
<v Speaker 2>Now I'll talk about my sister an example. It happened

0:23:00.480 --> 0:23:03.920
<v Speaker 2>to her when she was in UNI. She didn't make

0:23:04.000 --> 0:23:06.920
<v Speaker 2>a single university friend because she never met a single

0:23:07.040 --> 0:23:10.679
<v Speaker 2>university person. So her whole Uni, those whole three years,

0:23:10.720 --> 0:23:12.120
<v Speaker 2>she did completely online.

0:23:12.160 --> 0:23:13.800
<v Speaker 1>This is your sister, This is my sister. She's now

0:23:13.840 --> 0:23:14.359
<v Speaker 1>twenty four.

0:23:14.480 --> 0:23:17.439
<v Speaker 2>So is she into hobbies. She's so into hobbies. She's

0:23:17.480 --> 0:23:20.520
<v Speaker 2>developed an Instagram page just for her hobbies. Wow, and

0:23:20.640 --> 0:23:21.600
<v Speaker 2>she is so into it.

0:23:21.800 --> 0:23:22.560
<v Speaker 3>What abby?

0:23:22.680 --> 0:23:23.600
<v Speaker 1>Her hobbies include?

0:23:23.640 --> 0:23:26.119
<v Speaker 2>She reads a lot, like, she reads about three books

0:23:26.119 --> 0:23:28.400
<v Speaker 2>a week, and she made an Instagram page on that.

0:23:28.760 --> 0:23:30.879
<v Speaker 2>Drinking tea is a big hobby of hers.

0:23:31.160 --> 0:23:32.000
<v Speaker 3>Is maxing.

0:23:32.200 --> 0:23:35.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it is very cozy. She's never been to a nightclub.

0:23:35.640 --> 0:23:38.640
<v Speaker 2>She's never been Amelia that remember, never been to.

0:23:38.560 --> 0:23:39.920
<v Speaker 3>A night never a club.

0:23:40.240 --> 0:23:43.199
<v Speaker 2>She's never gotten drunk. And I'm sure she'd love me

0:23:43.200 --> 0:23:45.720
<v Speaker 2>airing her. Don't laundry, but like, and I don't.

0:23:45.520 --> 0:23:47.960
<v Speaker 3>Know any laundry laundry.

0:23:48.440 --> 0:23:50.760
<v Speaker 2>I don't know many young people her hey age, All

0:23:50.760 --> 0:23:52.480
<v Speaker 2>her friends and stuff are all the same. And I

0:23:52.480 --> 0:23:55.240
<v Speaker 2>think that's because when they came out of COVID, they

0:23:55.280 --> 0:23:58.240
<v Speaker 2>actually didn't know how to make friends. And I think

0:23:58.280 --> 0:24:01.040
<v Speaker 2>when I see young women out hanging out together doing

0:24:01.119 --> 0:24:03.200
<v Speaker 2>beating together, going to book clubs together.

0:24:03.520 --> 0:24:05.040
<v Speaker 1>This is our way of learning how.

0:24:06.920 --> 0:24:09.560
<v Speaker 2>Because if you tried to make friends at a nightclub,

0:24:09.760 --> 0:24:11.240
<v Speaker 2>it's not going to be a good friend.

0:24:11.359 --> 0:24:12.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm telling you that right now.

0:24:15.040 --> 0:24:18.159
<v Speaker 3>I'm could have made good friends in nightclubs. That is

0:24:18.200 --> 0:24:23.200
<v Speaker 3>the worst argument ever get and have sex all the business.

0:24:23.200 --> 0:24:25.680
<v Speaker 1>It's so true. You have a really good point there

0:24:25.720 --> 0:24:28.359
<v Speaker 1>about why does everybody want you to have more sex?

0:24:28.480 --> 0:24:32.160
<v Speaker 3>It is making good friends in nightclubs a less good point.

0:24:33.480 --> 0:24:36.800
<v Speaker 1>It is creepy that we are all nostalgically obsessed with

0:24:36.920 --> 0:24:40.000
<v Speaker 1>trying to make young people do all the dastardly things

0:24:40.040 --> 0:24:42.000
<v Speaker 1>that we did, and then we should be at home

0:24:42.040 --> 0:24:42.760
<v Speaker 1>doing homework in.

0:24:42.760 --> 0:24:45.080
<v Speaker 3>The same confusing.

0:24:45.760 --> 0:24:48.720
<v Speaker 1>It's interesting because gen X, which is where I am,

0:24:48.800 --> 0:24:53.040
<v Speaker 1>you know that we famously partied pretty hard, and there's

0:24:53.040 --> 0:24:55.960
<v Speaker 1>saying another big area of growth in terms of nightlife

0:24:56.000 --> 0:24:59.720
<v Speaker 1>is old people raving gen X basically still not wanting

0:24:59.720 --> 0:25:02.200
<v Speaker 1>to let go of that lifestyle. And they probably aren't

0:25:02.280 --> 0:25:05.080
<v Speaker 1>drinking as much or in vibing quite as many you know,

0:25:05.480 --> 0:25:07.800
<v Speaker 1>questionable things as they were when they're doing when they're twenty,

0:25:07.840 --> 0:25:12.200
<v Speaker 1>but they for them. Then nostalgia is lots of people

0:25:12.320 --> 0:25:15.040
<v Speaker 1>big room, big noise, being out being in that, and

0:25:15.040 --> 0:25:17.879
<v Speaker 1>that's the nostalgia. And I think that it's very hard

0:25:18.560 --> 0:25:20.720
<v Speaker 1>for any of us to understand why other people don't

0:25:20.760 --> 0:25:23.640
<v Speaker 1>love the things that we love, right, Like, you're kind

0:25:23.640 --> 0:25:26.520
<v Speaker 1>of going, but that's energy, and it's true. Is that

0:25:26.600 --> 0:25:29.159
<v Speaker 1>I on Saturday night? Actually, if we're all sharing our

0:25:29.200 --> 0:25:33.679
<v Speaker 1>Saturday nights here, not that anyone asks, but hey, I

0:25:33.720 --> 0:25:36.720
<v Speaker 1>went to see live music on Saturday night. One of

0:25:36.760 --> 0:25:39.200
<v Speaker 1>my friends is a performer and she had a show. Now,

0:25:39.320 --> 0:25:43.040
<v Speaker 1>I was not in the mood. I wanted to be cozy, Amelia.

0:25:43.240 --> 0:25:46.320
<v Speaker 1>I was tired a bit, you know, stuff's going on

0:25:46.359 --> 0:25:49.040
<v Speaker 1>in life. I wanted to be in bed and just

0:25:49.160 --> 0:25:52.040
<v Speaker 1>let not go. But I did the grown up thing.

0:25:52.359 --> 0:25:54.520
<v Speaker 1>I did the thing that's true to my gen X self,

0:25:55.280 --> 0:25:57.080
<v Speaker 1>and I got ready and I went out and I

0:25:57.160 --> 0:25:59.960
<v Speaker 1>drank champagne. I had a great time. And you're like,

0:26:00.440 --> 0:26:02.320
<v Speaker 1>I remember why it's so wonderful to be in a

0:26:02.400 --> 0:26:04.159
<v Speaker 1>room with lots of people who are all listening to

0:26:04.160 --> 0:26:06.280
<v Speaker 1>the same thing and enjoying the same thing, and watching

0:26:06.320 --> 0:26:10.000
<v Speaker 1>someone create art and all that stuff, like it was great.

0:26:10.359 --> 0:26:12.399
<v Speaker 1>Beating would not have been the same.

0:26:13.760 --> 0:26:14.879
<v Speaker 3>And I love beating them.

0:26:14.960 --> 0:26:18.439
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I love, I've got my own meaning, but

0:26:18.480 --> 0:26:20.760
<v Speaker 1>I do have my own cozy hobbies, like I love

0:26:20.800 --> 0:26:23.760
<v Speaker 1>my garden and all that stuff. But it's very I

0:26:23.760 --> 0:26:27.520
<v Speaker 1>think that part of why jen X in particular is

0:26:27.520 --> 0:26:29.359
<v Speaker 1>always going on at the young people to like go

0:26:29.480 --> 0:26:33.399
<v Speaker 1>out and get get drunk, make mistakes, sleep with the

0:26:33.400 --> 0:26:37.359
<v Speaker 1>wrong people. Is almost our own sense of shame. We

0:26:37.440 --> 0:26:39.800
<v Speaker 1>want it to be. We see it as judgment that

0:26:39.840 --> 0:26:42.080
<v Speaker 1>they're not doing it, you know what I mean, Whereas

0:26:42.119 --> 0:26:45.600
<v Speaker 1>I think you could see because obviously there is judgment.

0:26:45.760 --> 0:26:48.160
<v Speaker 1>It is judgment, it definitely is. Because there are lots

0:26:48.200 --> 0:26:50.840
<v Speaker 1>of reasons why. Finance is a reason why you've made

0:26:50.880 --> 0:26:53.560
<v Speaker 1>a very good point about the pandemic. The other reason

0:26:53.560 --> 0:26:56.920
<v Speaker 1>why is that we're everybody's so perceived all the time now,

0:26:56.960 --> 0:26:58.840
<v Speaker 1>and that you know, and if you go out, it's

0:26:58.880 --> 0:27:01.800
<v Speaker 1>a whole thing's to be documented. There's a lot of

0:27:01.840 --> 0:27:04.400
<v Speaker 1>effort involved in that, in terms of being ready, being

0:27:04.800 --> 0:27:09.040
<v Speaker 1>looking great, having everything instagrammable. It's exhausting. So I get

0:27:09.080 --> 0:27:12.280
<v Speaker 1>why you wouldn't want to. And I think it's interesting

0:27:12.280 --> 0:27:14.920
<v Speaker 1>because a lot of gen X is carry the weight

0:27:15.000 --> 0:27:18.720
<v Speaker 1>of all that, you know, acceptance of over drinking and

0:27:18.760 --> 0:27:20.920
<v Speaker 1>all those things, and it's almost like we want to

0:27:20.920 --> 0:27:23.120
<v Speaker 1>push it on you, like you have to have these

0:27:23.160 --> 0:27:26.960
<v Speaker 1>problems too. We can't just be up here with our

0:27:27.240 --> 0:27:31.000
<v Speaker 1>red flag drinking and our broken relationships and all those

0:27:31.200 --> 0:27:33.399
<v Speaker 1>like that. You guys have to get into this. It

0:27:33.560 --> 0:27:34.600
<v Speaker 1>is weird. I agree.

0:27:34.760 --> 0:27:35.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:27:35.160 --> 0:27:39.560
<v Speaker 2>And so when you see young people hobby maxing, are

0:27:39.600 --> 0:27:42.480
<v Speaker 2>you just like sad or you kind of like, wow,

0:27:42.520 --> 0:27:44.600
<v Speaker 2>good for them. They seem like they're having a really

0:27:44.600 --> 0:27:46.320
<v Speaker 2>good time, and I should probably respect that.

0:27:46.880 --> 0:27:49.120
<v Speaker 1>My instinct is what Amelia said, which is you've got

0:27:49.119 --> 0:27:51.680
<v Speaker 1>your whole life to do that. Like I remember being

0:27:51.720 --> 0:27:53.600
<v Speaker 1>young and I had a boyfriend and I was really

0:27:53.720 --> 0:27:56.080
<v Speaker 1>keen for us to like cook dinner together, and you know,

0:27:56.200 --> 0:27:58.960
<v Speaker 1>like that was so cozy. But you know, I'm sure

0:27:59.000 --> 0:28:01.119
<v Speaker 1>you relate. You're kind of like that would be so

0:28:01.240 --> 0:28:03.200
<v Speaker 1>nice to just stay in together on a Saturday night

0:28:03.240 --> 0:28:05.520
<v Speaker 1>and make something nice for tea. But then when you've

0:28:05.520 --> 0:28:09.680
<v Speaker 1>had twenty thirty years doing that, you're like, why was

0:28:09.800 --> 0:28:10.240
<v Speaker 1>I doing?

0:28:10.640 --> 0:28:12.800
<v Speaker 2>But then when you cooked dinner together, then you can

0:28:12.840 --> 0:28:14.639
<v Speaker 2>meal prep for the rest of the week, and then

0:28:14.680 --> 0:28:16.120
<v Speaker 2>you don't have to buy lunch.

0:28:15.920 --> 0:28:19.920
<v Speaker 3>Batch cook's sensible. Look, holy what I'm going to quote

0:28:19.960 --> 0:28:23.520
<v Speaker 3>from her substack, rather than sort of project onto young people.

0:28:24.480 --> 0:28:28.119
<v Speaker 3>She wrote a substack recently called are You Cozy or

0:28:28.200 --> 0:28:31.760
<v Speaker 3>Are You Depressed? And she talked about how her interest

0:28:31.840 --> 0:28:34.879
<v Speaker 3>in being cozy and in sort of leaving parties early

0:28:35.119 --> 0:28:38.080
<v Speaker 3>and not going out at all did coincide with her

0:28:38.360 --> 0:28:43.440
<v Speaker 3>becoming depressed, and she's now realized that that was sort

0:28:43.480 --> 0:28:46.640
<v Speaker 3>of too extreme and the issue is finding a balance,

0:28:46.680 --> 0:28:49.240
<v Speaker 3>which sometimes does mean getting out of her comfort zone,

0:28:49.240 --> 0:28:52.080
<v Speaker 3>but which for her will never mean clubbing and drinking.

0:28:52.520 --> 0:28:56.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah right, I think, yeah, the definition, I don't know

0:28:56.120 --> 0:28:59.720
<v Speaker 2>depends on a definition of cozy, because I see cozy

0:28:59.840 --> 0:29:03.480
<v Speaker 2>also being out and doing things like going to book clubs,

0:29:04.120 --> 0:29:06.120
<v Speaker 2>going to a wine bar. Like you're still going out,

0:29:06.160 --> 0:29:08.959
<v Speaker 2>You're still doing things. I think there is exactly what

0:29:09.040 --> 0:29:12.520
<v Speaker 2>she said, a difference between being inside all the time

0:29:12.720 --> 0:29:15.560
<v Speaker 2>and doing things. And this is from like my perspective,

0:29:15.720 --> 0:29:18.760
<v Speaker 2>and I've also been diagnosed with depression of you can

0:29:18.840 --> 0:29:20.680
<v Speaker 2>get in like a little bit of a rut if

0:29:20.720 --> 0:29:23.560
<v Speaker 2>you're constantly doing things on your own at home in

0:29:23.600 --> 0:29:26.480
<v Speaker 2>the dark, under a blanket, disguising it as the idea

0:29:26.520 --> 0:29:29.239
<v Speaker 2>of doing a cozy activity. I think that's exactly what

0:29:29.240 --> 0:29:31.480
<v Speaker 2>she said where it becomes dangerous, But I think.

0:29:31.360 --> 0:29:33.400
<v Speaker 1>You can still be cozy. Like those group of girls.

0:29:33.400 --> 0:29:34.800
<v Speaker 3>They like they looked cozy.

0:29:34.800 --> 0:29:35.680
<v Speaker 1>They're going out.

0:29:35.520 --> 0:29:39.000
<v Speaker 2>There, they're making friends, they're playing cards, they're doing something.

0:29:39.400 --> 0:29:40.680
<v Speaker 1>They're just not making mistakes.

0:29:42.840 --> 0:29:46.680
<v Speaker 3>Mark Zuckerberg's in his villain era. I'm just going to

0:29:46.720 --> 0:29:49.040
<v Speaker 3>read the headline from The Guardian which came across the

0:29:49.120 --> 0:29:53.480
<v Speaker 3>Chance in this morning. Zuckerberg faces questions over why super

0:29:53.560 --> 0:29:58.640
<v Speaker 3>yacht reportedly declined to help stranded vote. Oh wow, zuck

0:29:58.840 --> 0:30:02.200
<v Speaker 3>was yourch was cruising in Alaska. It costs four hundred

0:30:02.240 --> 0:30:04.880
<v Speaker 3>and twenty five million dollars. This yacht and a nearby

0:30:04.960 --> 0:30:09.000
<v Speaker 3>skiff ran out of fuel, but Zuckerberg's yacht failed to

0:30:09.040 --> 0:30:12.160
<v Speaker 3>respond to the distress call, and instead a small commercial

0:30:12.160 --> 0:30:14.880
<v Speaker 3>cruise ship, which was much further away, had to come

0:30:15.000 --> 0:30:18.720
<v Speaker 3>to the skiff's aid. You might remember this yacht because

0:30:18.760 --> 0:30:21.560
<v Speaker 3>earlier this year there were some dawning headlines when it

0:30:21.640 --> 0:30:24.920
<v Speaker 3>sailed into Seattle Harbor at the exact time that Meta

0:30:25.000 --> 0:30:28.960
<v Speaker 3>laid off hundreds of employees. The yacht, actually it sounds

0:30:28.960 --> 0:30:30.800
<v Speaker 3>like a really nice yacht. It was originally owned by

0:30:30.800 --> 0:30:34.600
<v Speaker 3>a sanctioned Russian oligarch. They've always got really good taste.

0:30:34.680 --> 0:30:38.400
<v Speaker 3>And now I should say apparently Zuk and his wife

0:30:38.440 --> 0:30:40.360
<v Speaker 3>were not on the yacht at the time, so it's

0:30:40.400 --> 0:30:43.200
<v Speaker 3>not their fault, but they are the yacht's fault. It's

0:30:43.240 --> 0:30:46.160
<v Speaker 3>the yacht's fault. But they are also in the headlines

0:30:46.200 --> 0:30:49.120
<v Speaker 3>for another classic villain move, which is they closed a

0:30:49.280 --> 0:30:54.840
<v Speaker 3>school they founded for disadvantaged children. The Primary School, as

0:30:54.840 --> 0:30:58.200
<v Speaker 3>it was called, was co founded by Zuckerberg's pediatrician wife,

0:30:58.240 --> 0:31:02.920
<v Speaker 3>Priscilla in twenty sixteen. School was outside San Francisco. Reading

0:31:02.960 --> 0:31:06.360
<v Speaker 3>from its website, it says the primary school was founded

0:31:06.400 --> 0:31:09.760
<v Speaker 3>on the guiding principle that raising a child is a

0:31:09.800 --> 0:31:13.920
<v Speaker 3>team effort. Well, apparently not that much of a team effort,

0:31:14.000 --> 0:31:16.800
<v Speaker 3>because the sixth richest man in the world and his

0:31:16.840 --> 0:31:21.360
<v Speaker 3>wife cited difficulties in raising funds for the school as

0:31:21.400 --> 0:31:24.000
<v Speaker 3>a reason for closing it. They just passed around the

0:31:24.040 --> 0:31:27.000
<v Speaker 3>hat didn't get enough money and said, you know what,

0:31:27.160 --> 0:31:29.320
<v Speaker 3>did yousa found each kids really need a school?

0:31:29.480 --> 0:31:31.480
<v Speaker 1>Probably, no, we really need a yacht.

0:31:32.400 --> 0:31:35.360
<v Speaker 3>And now the local school has to put up portable

0:31:35.400 --> 0:31:38.080
<v Speaker 3>trailers because there are five hundred students who need to

0:31:38.120 --> 0:31:40.240
<v Speaker 3>stay in school ahead of the start of the next

0:31:40.240 --> 0:31:40.960
<v Speaker 3>academic year.

0:31:41.040 --> 0:31:43.200
<v Speaker 1>They should have thought of a better excuse. I don't

0:31:43.240 --> 0:31:45.040
<v Speaker 1>think they could say there isn't enough money for this

0:31:45.080 --> 0:31:46.040
<v Speaker 1>school when they've got.

0:31:45.880 --> 0:31:46.880
<v Speaker 3>More money than anyone.

0:31:47.080 --> 0:31:49.200
<v Speaker 1>You know. There's been a bit of chitchat about how

0:31:49.280 --> 0:31:51.040
<v Speaker 1>much chitchat we do about billionaires.

0:31:51.160 --> 0:31:53.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, people think I mean to them well.

0:31:53.280 --> 0:31:55.000
<v Speaker 1>And also some people are like, why do you talk

0:31:55.040 --> 0:31:58.320
<v Speaker 1>about them, like they are not relevant, But I want

0:31:58.320 --> 0:32:02.040
<v Speaker 1>to make the point that they are relevant because we

0:32:02.160 --> 0:32:04.320
<v Speaker 1>live in an era where they are the most powerful

0:32:04.320 --> 0:32:06.400
<v Speaker 1>people in the world, right, like no question.

0:32:06.840 --> 0:32:07.720
<v Speaker 3>If you're on the skiff.

0:32:09.320 --> 0:32:11.800
<v Speaker 1>But also they're more powerful than most governments. They're way

0:32:11.800 --> 0:32:14.280
<v Speaker 1>more powerful than most politicians. They've got more money than

0:32:14.360 --> 0:32:17.320
<v Speaker 1>most you know, small nations and large nail and.

0:32:17.400 --> 0:32:20.160
<v Speaker 3>Mask is like the twentieth richest country in the world.

0:32:20.480 --> 0:32:23.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so I think it's like that's kind of why

0:32:23.440 --> 0:32:27.880
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting what they do, where they go, how they behave.

0:32:29.080 --> 0:32:31.920
<v Speaker 1>I was when I went to see The Odyssey, as

0:32:31.920 --> 0:32:33.920
<v Speaker 1>I have already mentioned, because I'm so proud that I

0:32:33.960 --> 0:32:36.680
<v Speaker 1>went to the movies. I saw the trailer for The

0:32:36.720 --> 0:32:39.520
<v Speaker 1>Social Reckoning Have you seen that? So it's kind of

0:32:39.560 --> 0:32:43.800
<v Speaker 1>like the next wave of the Social Network movie written

0:32:43.800 --> 0:32:48.200
<v Speaker 1>by Aaron Sorkins, starring Jeremy Strong, Jeremy Strong from Succession.

0:32:48.000 --> 0:32:49.479
<v Speaker 3>And Jeremy Allen White.

0:32:49.640 --> 0:32:55.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah play yes, So Jeremy Strong plays Zuckerberg. And one

0:32:55.840 --> 0:32:58.640
<v Speaker 1>thing you can get very quickly from the trailer is

0:32:58.680 --> 0:33:02.080
<v Speaker 1>this is not a very flattering It is going to

0:33:02.160 --> 0:33:05.680
<v Speaker 1>be really interesting because it very much plays them just again,

0:33:05.760 --> 0:33:07.720
<v Speaker 1>I've only seen the trailer, but as being in the

0:33:07.840 --> 0:33:10.360
<v Speaker 1>villain era and being the villains of our time.

0:33:10.680 --> 0:33:14.320
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, they said recently they couldn't afford the school,

0:33:14.400 --> 0:33:17.200
<v Speaker 3>but now they're redirecting the funds that they used to

0:33:17.240 --> 0:33:21.440
<v Speaker 3>spend on research into early childhood education into drum roll

0:33:21.480 --> 0:33:23.440
<v Speaker 3>please ai oh.

0:33:24.400 --> 0:33:28.200
<v Speaker 1>Oh no, interviewing you for your next job. Happy for them,

0:33:28.240 --> 0:33:31.320
<v Speaker 1>I guess. Okay, we've got to have something cheerful to

0:33:31.360 --> 0:33:34.120
<v Speaker 1>talk about, I'm sure. And what's next.

0:33:34.120 --> 0:33:37.640
<v Speaker 2>After the break, we have a very famous actor on

0:33:37.760 --> 0:33:41.840
<v Speaker 2>why he ended a twenty nine year friendship. Very cheerful

0:33:42.760 --> 0:33:46.320
<v Speaker 2>actor Richard E. Grant went on the Mad, Bad, Sad

0:33:46.440 --> 0:33:49.760
<v Speaker 2>podcast Great Name, hosted by a Paloma Faith, and he

0:33:49.800 --> 0:33:52.560
<v Speaker 2>talked about how he was betrayed by his best friend

0:33:52.680 --> 0:33:54.720
<v Speaker 2>and exactly what he did about it.

0:33:54.720 --> 0:33:56.640
<v Speaker 1>Take a listen to this what I thought was.

0:33:56.640 --> 0:33:58.600
<v Speaker 5>One of the five best friends of my life. She

0:33:59.200 --> 0:34:02.160
<v Speaker 5>sent an email. Because my name was in the body

0:34:02.160 --> 0:34:05.479
<v Speaker 5>of the email I got inadvertently sent this email and

0:34:05.520 --> 0:34:08.279
<v Speaker 5>it arrived on a day when I had heard for

0:34:08.320 --> 0:34:10.360
<v Speaker 5>the third time that a film that I'd written and

0:34:10.520 --> 0:34:14.600
<v Speaker 5>was about to direct the finances had collapsed, and I

0:34:14.640 --> 0:34:17.200
<v Speaker 5>was doing the final episode of Frasier. I got this

0:34:17.280 --> 0:34:20.640
<v Speaker 5>email that wasn't intended for me to see, but there

0:34:20.680 --> 0:34:25.479
<v Speaker 5>was a paragraph of such toxicity and I out here, Yeah,

0:34:25.719 --> 0:34:29.319
<v Speaker 5>and I thought, this person is that's not a real

0:34:29.360 --> 0:34:32.920
<v Speaker 5>friend anymore. And I was absolutely devastated. So I copied

0:34:32.920 --> 0:34:35.319
<v Speaker 5>and pasted that and then sent it back and I said,

0:34:35.320 --> 0:34:36.600
<v Speaker 5>twenty nine years of friendship.

0:34:36.680 --> 0:34:41.360
<v Speaker 3>Question, man, what was it? Ann annihilation of your character?

0:34:41.800 --> 0:34:44.439
<v Speaker 5>It was of my script that I had written, which

0:34:44.480 --> 0:34:48.799
<v Speaker 5>was entirely autobiographical. My daughter was very smart because she

0:34:48.880 --> 0:34:52.520
<v Speaker 5>was sixteen. She said to me, in your heart of hearts,

0:34:52.560 --> 0:34:56.480
<v Speaker 5>haven't you always known this about that person? So when

0:34:56.520 --> 0:34:59.799
<v Speaker 5>you're betrayed like that, it's there's no going back for me.

0:35:00.719 --> 0:35:03.839
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot to unpack in that A lot. Number one.

0:35:04.280 --> 0:35:06.279
<v Speaker 1>If you ever wondered what a posh English accent is

0:35:06.280 --> 0:35:08.399
<v Speaker 1>that's a Polish got it go away?

0:35:09.680 --> 0:35:12.840
<v Speaker 2>When I first listened to this, my fear that instilled

0:35:12.880 --> 0:35:16.040
<v Speaker 2>in me was like, how did that email was accidentally

0:35:16.080 --> 0:35:16.640
<v Speaker 2>sent to him?

0:35:16.800 --> 0:35:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Because his name was in the bottom.

0:35:18.040 --> 0:35:20.880
<v Speaker 3>I think it's because sometimes this has happened in lower

0:35:20.920 --> 0:35:24.040
<v Speaker 3>stakes ways than me. Sometimes, when you were thinking of

0:35:24.120 --> 0:35:28.480
<v Speaker 3>a person who the email is about, you can sometimes

0:35:29.520 --> 0:35:31.240
<v Speaker 3>accidentally address it to them.

0:35:31.440 --> 0:35:34.839
<v Speaker 2>That's disgusting, it is I think I'm blaming the Okay,

0:35:34.960 --> 0:35:38.040
<v Speaker 2>I have some questions for the for the group about this.

0:35:38.160 --> 0:35:40.480
<v Speaker 3>Yes? Right? Is there? So?

0:35:40.560 --> 0:35:42.080
<v Speaker 1>There are two things that are really interesting to me

0:35:42.080 --> 0:35:44.719
<v Speaker 1>in this is. One is talking shit about one of

0:35:44.760 --> 0:35:48.279
<v Speaker 1>your friends, if there's ever a safe way to do that,

0:35:49.080 --> 0:35:52.680
<v Speaker 1>And the other is about criticizing your friend's work. Because

0:35:52.719 --> 0:35:54.520
<v Speaker 1>those are two quite different things.

0:35:54.640 --> 0:35:54.879
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:35:55.520 --> 0:35:58.560
<v Speaker 1>So the first one is, if you've been friends with

0:35:58.600 --> 0:36:01.719
<v Speaker 1>someone for twenty nine years and you've got an intense relationship,

0:36:01.760 --> 0:36:03.640
<v Speaker 1>probably sometimes you need to let off a bit of

0:36:03.640 --> 0:36:04.439
<v Speaker 1>steam about them.

0:36:04.640 --> 0:36:04.839
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:36:05.680 --> 0:36:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Is there any such thing as a safe place to

0:36:08.719 --> 0:36:13.000
<v Speaker 1>do what you could maybe term healthy venting about a friend?

0:36:13.520 --> 0:36:15.840
<v Speaker 1>Or is that the very definition of not being a friend.

0:36:17.080 --> 0:36:18.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't think you can.

0:36:18.320 --> 0:36:21.120
<v Speaker 2>I think if they're your best best friend and you

0:36:21.280 --> 0:36:25.480
<v Speaker 2>need to vent about something that they're doing. The person

0:36:25.520 --> 0:36:28.480
<v Speaker 2>you should be venting to is that friend. Can you say,

0:36:28.480 --> 0:36:30.160
<v Speaker 2>without wanting to get you in any trouble, that you

0:36:30.239 --> 0:36:33.440
<v Speaker 2>literally never talk to your friends about another friend? Literally

0:36:33.520 --> 0:36:34.200
<v Speaker 2>you never do that.

0:36:34.320 --> 0:36:36.719
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, they're driving me crazy at the moment. Or I

0:36:36.719 --> 0:36:38.160
<v Speaker 1>wish you'd do blah blah blah.

0:36:38.160 --> 0:36:40.960
<v Speaker 2>Close acquaintances, yeah, free for all. Yeah, yeah, I can

0:36:41.000 --> 0:36:44.640
<v Speaker 2>do whatever close close friends, hand on heart. Never, I'll

0:36:44.640 --> 0:36:47.719
<v Speaker 2>never talk to a friend about another friend. I will

0:36:47.760 --> 0:36:50.040
<v Speaker 2>talk directly to that friend if they're doing something I

0:36:50.080 --> 0:36:50.480
<v Speaker 2>don't like.

0:36:50.719 --> 0:36:53.520
<v Speaker 1>Ooh, that's a high bar. I'm very impressed. I try

0:36:53.640 --> 0:36:57.520
<v Speaker 1>very hard not to talk shit, but sometimes sometimes it's

0:36:57.640 --> 0:36:58.120
<v Speaker 1>very hard.

0:36:58.719 --> 0:37:04.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean, yes, I don't quite believe this. I'm sorry, really, okay.

0:37:05.040 --> 0:37:07.560
<v Speaker 1>I know that you've always prided yourself a memory direct

0:37:07.600 --> 0:37:10.359
<v Speaker 1>and I know that's very true about you. But let's

0:37:10.400 --> 0:37:12.600
<v Speaker 1>say that one of your really good friends is in

0:37:12.640 --> 0:37:15.759
<v Speaker 1>a relationship that you think is bullshit. Let's use that

0:37:15.800 --> 0:37:18.200
<v Speaker 1>as an example. Are you really telling me that you

0:37:18.200 --> 0:37:20.279
<v Speaker 1>would never say to one of your other friends in

0:37:20.320 --> 0:37:23.799
<v Speaker 1>your friendship? I wish Betty would like he's such a dick.

0:37:26.080 --> 0:37:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Really never a good example, because you know how they

0:37:29.040 --> 0:37:31.680
<v Speaker 1>say a test is would you say this to them?

0:37:31.840 --> 0:37:33.760
<v Speaker 1>And if you wouldn't say this to them, you shouldn't

0:37:33.800 --> 0:37:34.080
<v Speaker 1>say it.

0:37:34.040 --> 0:37:36.320
<v Speaker 3>But the reason why that's a good example is because

0:37:36.360 --> 0:37:40.160
<v Speaker 3>that's not bitching about your friend. That's saying like that

0:37:40.480 --> 0:37:44.320
<v Speaker 3>choice is creating problems for her soul.

0:37:45.680 --> 0:37:49.000
<v Speaker 2>So friend a shitty relationship. I go to friend B

0:37:49.560 --> 0:37:52.759
<v Speaker 2>and I say she's in a shitty relationship. I want

0:37:52.760 --> 0:37:54.680
<v Speaker 2>to do something about it. I want to address it.

0:37:54.880 --> 0:37:57.680
<v Speaker 2>I will never just let that conversation stay with friend B.

0:37:57.960 --> 0:37:59.920
<v Speaker 2>It'll always has to bring back to friend A, and

0:38:00.040 --> 0:38:02.440
<v Speaker 2>I'll be like, I talked to this person, we think

0:38:02.520 --> 0:38:04.680
<v Speaker 2>you should do this, Or I'll bring all of us

0:38:04.680 --> 0:38:07.000
<v Speaker 2>together and be like, we think you should do this intervention.

0:38:07.520 --> 0:38:10.400
<v Speaker 2>But I will never just let a side conversation happen

0:38:10.480 --> 0:38:12.920
<v Speaker 2>about a friend but am addressing it in the end.

0:38:13.000 --> 0:38:15.360
<v Speaker 1>I try very hard. I can't say that I always

0:38:15.360 --> 0:38:18.040
<v Speaker 1>live up to that. It's very impressive because.

0:38:17.840 --> 0:38:20.920
<v Speaker 2>I think my friendships and I was thinking about what

0:38:21.080 --> 0:38:24.200
<v Speaker 2>Richard was saying about ending the twenty nine year friendship,

0:38:24.239 --> 0:38:26.040
<v Speaker 2>and it made me a bit like, oh my god,

0:38:26.080 --> 0:38:29.759
<v Speaker 2>that's really scary. Because I think my friendships live in

0:38:29.840 --> 0:38:34.719
<v Speaker 2>between romantic partner and sibling. If a romantic partner did

0:38:34.719 --> 0:38:37.320
<v Speaker 2>that to me, I think immediate breakup. If a sibling

0:38:37.400 --> 0:38:40.120
<v Speaker 2>did that to me, I like, that's fine, Like it

0:38:40.160 --> 0:38:42.920
<v Speaker 2>will be really really hard, But you can't break up

0:38:42.960 --> 0:38:45.640
<v Speaker 2>with a sibling. And friendships live in that middle space.

0:38:45.680 --> 0:38:48.000
<v Speaker 2>That's always a great area. So I actually don't know

0:38:48.040 --> 0:38:48.839
<v Speaker 2>what I would do.

0:38:49.120 --> 0:38:52.359
<v Speaker 1>There is a possibility that friend who wrote the shit

0:38:52.400 --> 0:38:55.080
<v Speaker 1>about rich D Grant did not see their friendship in

0:38:55.160 --> 0:38:56.720
<v Speaker 1>quite the same frame that he did.

0:38:57.040 --> 0:38:59.239
<v Speaker 3>What I was intrigued by in that is, he said

0:38:59.280 --> 0:39:01.719
<v Speaker 3>this person was one of the five best friends of

0:39:01.800 --> 0:39:05.680
<v Speaker 3>my life, which struck me just as a surprising formulation

0:39:05.960 --> 0:39:07.880
<v Speaker 3>because I don't think I've ever had the thought of

0:39:08.280 --> 0:39:10.920
<v Speaker 3>this person as one of the five best friends of

0:39:10.960 --> 0:39:13.920
<v Speaker 3>my life. It just feels like a strange way of

0:39:13.960 --> 0:39:17.160
<v Speaker 3>putting friends on tears.

0:39:17.320 --> 0:39:19.760
<v Speaker 1>I think that that makes sense to me, Like, because

0:39:20.680 --> 0:39:23.320
<v Speaker 1>over your life, you probably have you're closer to different

0:39:23.360 --> 0:39:27.759
<v Speaker 1>people at different times, and you probably have maybe you know,

0:39:27.840 --> 0:39:31.480
<v Speaker 1>you might have school friends, uni friends, work friends, whatever,

0:39:31.560 --> 0:39:34.480
<v Speaker 1>and at different yeah, you probably gotten inner circle that

0:39:34.600 --> 0:39:35.120
<v Speaker 1>is your.

0:39:35.120 --> 0:39:38.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, right, Yeah, I could see that. I guess. The

0:39:38.160 --> 0:39:40.640
<v Speaker 3>other thing about this that I thought was, this is

0:39:40.680 --> 0:39:45.239
<v Speaker 3>a particular predicament about work and friendship and mixing the

0:39:45.280 --> 0:39:49.600
<v Speaker 3>two of them. And I know you're as a novelist, Holly,

0:39:49.880 --> 0:39:52.399
<v Speaker 3>You're putting your work out there in the world, and

0:39:52.520 --> 0:39:55.960
<v Speaker 3>it must be sometimes stressful when you have a book

0:39:55.960 --> 0:39:59.440
<v Speaker 3>coming out? Do you how do you navigate that with

0:39:59.480 --> 0:40:00.000
<v Speaker 3>your friends?

0:40:00.080 --> 0:40:03.600
<v Speaker 1>So I'm weird in that my friends will tell you,

0:40:03.640 --> 0:40:05.960
<v Speaker 1>particularly my friends who are like not in my world,

0:40:06.080 --> 0:40:09.560
<v Speaker 1>like my professional world. I hate talking to them about

0:40:09.600 --> 0:40:12.040
<v Speaker 1>my professional world. I don't do it. So I was

0:40:12.080 --> 0:40:15.160
<v Speaker 1>thinking about this in that it isn't a prerequisite to

0:40:15.239 --> 0:40:18.120
<v Speaker 1>be my friend that you have to like my books, like,

0:40:18.440 --> 0:40:21.440
<v Speaker 1>because I can't control that. Like, you might love me,

0:40:21.560 --> 0:40:24.200
<v Speaker 1>but you might think my books are shit. I don't

0:40:24.239 --> 0:40:26.080
<v Speaker 1>want you to tell me that you think my books

0:40:26.120 --> 0:40:28.880
<v Speaker 1>are shit. But you don't have to pretend that you

0:40:29.080 --> 0:40:31.719
<v Speaker 1>like them, because that's worse. You can always tell when

0:40:31.760 --> 0:40:35.120
<v Speaker 1>somebody doesn't really like your work and it's like it's

0:40:35.200 --> 0:40:40.640
<v Speaker 1>so interesting, like or they're reaching around. So I think

0:40:40.719 --> 0:40:42.920
<v Speaker 1>you have to if you've got if your work is

0:40:42.960 --> 0:40:45.080
<v Speaker 1>in the public sphere in any way, or maybe it's

0:40:45.120 --> 0:40:48.000
<v Speaker 1>creative or well who knows, but it touches people in

0:40:48.040 --> 0:40:50.279
<v Speaker 1>a way that they would have opinions about it. You

0:40:50.360 --> 0:40:53.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of have to make for me. The way that

0:40:53.600 --> 0:40:55.600
<v Speaker 1>I do it is there's I feel like there's a

0:40:55.640 --> 0:40:58.040
<v Speaker 1>firm divide, like you don't have to and we don't

0:40:58.080 --> 0:41:00.920
<v Speaker 1>have to talk about it, and we can pretend that

0:41:01.000 --> 0:41:02.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't have a book coming out and that it

0:41:02.520 --> 0:41:05.759
<v Speaker 1>doesn't matter. In fact, I would rather than like professional

0:41:05.840 --> 0:41:07.840
<v Speaker 1>like friends who are in the same professional world is

0:41:07.880 --> 0:41:10.040
<v Speaker 1>a bit different, which is maybe where this falls for

0:41:10.080 --> 0:41:13.160
<v Speaker 1>they grant is you would expect them to support you

0:41:13.280 --> 0:41:17.240
<v Speaker 1>and help you do well. It's because it's like whether

0:41:17.280 --> 0:41:19.280
<v Speaker 1>they love it or not is not really the point.

0:41:19.320 --> 0:41:21.760
<v Speaker 1>You just would like their support. But if my friend's

0:41:22.400 --> 0:41:26.120
<v Speaker 1>a teacher, then I like she doesn't always prefer that.

0:41:26.000 --> 0:41:29.399
<v Speaker 2>She doesn't exist because it's unequal, Like you're not going

0:41:29.440 --> 0:41:31.040
<v Speaker 2>to go to a friend who works in a bank

0:41:31.120 --> 0:41:33.200
<v Speaker 2>and like judge them on their job and go to

0:41:33.239 --> 0:41:35.760
<v Speaker 2>their presentations. But I think what's a bit different about

0:41:35.840 --> 0:41:40.040
<v Speaker 2>the Richard story is that because he said that it

0:41:40.280 --> 0:41:43.520
<v Speaker 2>was a memoir, so I have a feeling that what

0:41:43.719 --> 0:41:46.640
<v Speaker 2>she critiqued was something that was quite personal and was

0:41:46.719 --> 0:41:49.560
<v Speaker 2>more of a critique on him as a person rather

0:41:49.600 --> 0:41:53.200
<v Speaker 2>than his actual skill set, and I think that can

0:41:53.560 --> 0:41:57.480
<v Speaker 2>depending on what exactly she said, that definitely could end

0:41:57.480 --> 0:41:58.120
<v Speaker 2>a friendship.

0:41:58.200 --> 0:42:01.520
<v Speaker 3>I had a friend who I think me. I had

0:42:01.640 --> 0:42:05.000
<v Speaker 3>a very close friend in my twenties and we just

0:42:05.040 --> 0:42:07.440
<v Speaker 3>shared everything with each other. We would have been the

0:42:07.480 --> 0:42:11.200
<v Speaker 3>ones playing cards at the pub all through our twenties

0:42:11.239 --> 0:42:13.480
<v Speaker 3>when we were at that stage, as Richard E. Grant

0:42:13.520 --> 0:42:15.800
<v Speaker 3>is saying, where you're sort of seeing who's going to

0:42:15.880 --> 0:42:18.759
<v Speaker 3>make it, who's going to live out their dreams. And

0:42:18.880 --> 0:42:21.400
<v Speaker 3>this Warmer friend of mine is very successful at what

0:42:21.480 --> 0:42:24.239
<v Speaker 3>she does and it's in the media, so we are

0:42:24.239 --> 0:42:28.319
<v Speaker 3>in the same field. But I invited her to my

0:42:28.480 --> 0:42:31.120
<v Speaker 3>wedding when we were sort of a little bit rocky,

0:42:31.960 --> 0:42:34.399
<v Speaker 3>because I just had this feeling of I just want

0:42:34.440 --> 0:42:36.759
<v Speaker 3>to sort of have a big tent, literally, so I

0:42:36.800 --> 0:42:41.400
<v Speaker 3>invited her to the wedding. And then I learned later

0:42:41.800 --> 0:42:48.760
<v Speaker 3>that she had criticized my first dance that's not okay,

0:42:49.400 --> 0:42:52.080
<v Speaker 3>and look, I'm not a good dancer, but I wasn't

0:42:52.120 --> 0:42:54.040
<v Speaker 3>trying to be a good dancer, and it was just.

0:42:54.360 --> 0:42:55.720
<v Speaker 1>To other people at the wedding.

0:42:55.960 --> 0:42:58.760
<v Speaker 3>Yes, apparently as it was going on, she like live

0:42:58.880 --> 0:43:04.520
<v Speaker 3>critiqued it, know live critique, Like she gave a live critique,

0:43:04.840 --> 0:43:09.160
<v Speaker 3>and so I literally never spoke to her again, does

0:43:09.200 --> 0:43:10.279
<v Speaker 3>she know that you?

0:43:10.440 --> 0:43:13.239
<v Speaker 1>That's what happened, Like, did you know how Richard E.

0:43:13.360 --> 0:43:17.200
<v Speaker 1>Grant copied the paragraph back? You could have been like,

0:43:17.560 --> 0:43:18.960
<v Speaker 1>I heard you said my footwork.

0:43:18.960 --> 0:43:21.839
<v Speaker 3>Well, actually what happened was I learned about it on

0:43:21.880 --> 0:43:24.840
<v Speaker 3>Twitter back when it was Twitter. Long story, but so,

0:43:25.000 --> 0:43:27.200
<v Speaker 3>I mean I guess she knew that it had been

0:43:27.239 --> 0:43:28.480
<v Speaker 3>publicly disclosed.

0:43:29.040 --> 0:43:32.319
<v Speaker 1>WHOA, Because so here's my thing about Like I know

0:43:32.360 --> 0:43:35.759
<v Speaker 1>you shouldn't tear friendships, and I don't really, but there

0:43:35.760 --> 0:43:37.480
<v Speaker 1>are people who are friends of mine who I like

0:43:37.520 --> 0:43:39.600
<v Speaker 1>and I enjoy hanging out with, but I don't necessarily

0:43:39.920 --> 0:43:42.880
<v Speaker 1>trust them, and it's not an important thing then, But

0:43:42.960 --> 0:43:46.160
<v Speaker 1>you're in a circle your five best friends, as he describes,

0:43:47.000 --> 0:43:49.720
<v Speaker 1>they should punch someone in the face if they're critiquing

0:43:49.760 --> 0:43:54.520
<v Speaker 1>your first dance. I don't mean literally, we don't condone violence.

0:43:54.520 --> 0:43:57.160
<v Speaker 1>But what I mean is there's like, if you're an

0:43:57.239 --> 0:44:01.640
<v Speaker 1>acquaintance at that wedding, you can make a little joke

0:44:01.680 --> 0:44:06.399
<v Speaker 1>about something, but not in that in a tent, absolutely

0:44:06.520 --> 0:44:09.919
<v Speaker 1>not like you expect a level of trust that would

0:44:09.920 --> 0:44:10.719
<v Speaker 1>not allow that to happen.

0:44:10.760 --> 0:44:13.160
<v Speaker 3>And what I relate to in what Richard E. Grant

0:44:13.239 --> 0:44:15.520
<v Speaker 3>is saying here, I'll always think of him as mister

0:44:15.560 --> 0:44:19.440
<v Speaker 3>Spice World, But what he's saying here is that it's

0:44:19.480 --> 0:44:23.400
<v Speaker 3>it's particularly helpful because when you make friends in your youth,

0:44:24.080 --> 0:44:27.880
<v Speaker 3>you really do share absolutely everything with each other. And

0:44:27.960 --> 0:44:32.360
<v Speaker 3>so there was this sense that she knows everything about

0:44:32.400 --> 0:44:36.279
<v Speaker 3>me and everything that has led to and arguably culminated

0:44:36.360 --> 0:44:39.480
<v Speaker 3>in this moment, and for her to then sort of

0:44:39.520 --> 0:44:43.920
<v Speaker 3>demean the moment makes it even more egregious.

0:44:44.160 --> 0:44:48.239
<v Speaker 1>Do you think there is any way back for a

0:44:48.360 --> 0:44:50.920
<v Speaker 1>situation where that line's been crossed, like in the Richard E.

0:44:51.000 --> 0:44:53.800
<v Speaker 1>Grant case, Like, is there any way back from the

0:44:54.320 --> 0:44:57.840
<v Speaker 1>email or the overheard conversation or the you know whatever.

0:44:57.880 --> 0:44:59.319
<v Speaker 1>Do you think there's any way back from that?

0:45:01.400 --> 0:45:04.160
<v Speaker 3>I think there is. I'll just would you if she

0:45:04.320 --> 0:45:08.520
<v Speaker 3>had come to me and said, here's why I chose

0:45:08.760 --> 0:45:10.719
<v Speaker 3>or here's why I wanted to kind of bring you

0:45:10.800 --> 0:45:13.480
<v Speaker 3>down in that moment and then gave me an explanation

0:45:13.800 --> 0:45:16.880
<v Speaker 3>that was rooted in what was going on for her vulnerabilities,

0:45:16.880 --> 0:45:19.680
<v Speaker 3>that she was some vulnerability the issues she was bringing

0:45:19.680 --> 0:45:22.600
<v Speaker 3>to the table when she made that criticism. I think

0:45:22.760 --> 0:45:25.239
<v Speaker 3>I would be very open to that, because it's a

0:45:25.280 --> 0:45:27.719
<v Speaker 3>source of sadness when someone with whom you were so

0:45:27.840 --> 0:45:30.960
<v Speaker 3>close is no longer in your life. But she never

0:45:31.000 --> 0:45:33.319
<v Speaker 3>did that, so I guess it's hypothetically.

0:45:32.760 --> 0:45:35.319
<v Speaker 1>And I guess Richard E. Grant's friend never said, this

0:45:35.400 --> 0:45:37.359
<v Speaker 1>is why I was so harsh about your work. It's

0:45:37.360 --> 0:45:39.920
<v Speaker 1>because I'm jealous, or it's because I wish that for myself,

0:45:40.000 --> 0:45:42.280
<v Speaker 1>or because I think you're better than that, or whatever.

0:45:43.120 --> 0:45:44.000
<v Speaker 1>It's really hard.

0:45:44.200 --> 0:45:45.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I don't think.

0:45:45.680 --> 0:45:46.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't know.

0:45:47.000 --> 0:45:50.600
<v Speaker 2>The older I get, the less less tolerable I am

0:45:50.800 --> 0:45:52.360
<v Speaker 2>of mean people.

0:45:52.719 --> 0:45:56.040
<v Speaker 1>One last question the daughter who said, did you always know?

0:45:56.160 --> 0:45:56.720
<v Speaker 3>Deep down?

0:45:57.000 --> 0:45:58.560
<v Speaker 1>That's a really good question.

0:45:58.640 --> 0:46:00.880
<v Speaker 3>Yes. The answer yes, that would make me.

0:46:00.880 --> 0:46:05.160
<v Speaker 1>Spon because it's you often know, don't you like? I'm

0:46:05.280 --> 0:46:07.439
<v Speaker 1>very if you know how sometimes you might call someone

0:46:07.440 --> 0:46:10.040
<v Speaker 1>by mistake or they call you by mistake, and you

0:46:10.120 --> 0:46:13.440
<v Speaker 1>can listen in on what they're doing. I can't, like

0:46:13.480 --> 0:46:15.160
<v Speaker 1>I have I don't want to know. I don't want

0:46:15.200 --> 0:46:17.080
<v Speaker 1>to know, you know, I'm like, what if they're saying

0:46:17.080 --> 0:46:19.040
<v Speaker 1>something about me? And that's why the voice got no.

0:46:19.080 --> 0:46:20.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to know la la la la laud

0:46:20.640 --> 0:46:22.800
<v Speaker 1>rather not know but you.

0:46:23.160 --> 0:46:27.000
<v Speaker 3>But you do always know. And with this particule person I,

0:46:27.160 --> 0:46:29.360
<v Speaker 3>when I first met her, I didn't trust her and

0:46:29.440 --> 0:46:31.680
<v Speaker 3>I should have just went gone with my first instinct.

0:46:33.480 --> 0:46:37.239
<v Speaker 1>Interesting out louder, You always know, do you? How do

0:46:37.280 --> 0:46:39.440
<v Speaker 1>you deal with a friend's betrayal? It's a big, big

0:46:39.480 --> 0:46:42.279
<v Speaker 1>deal in our worlds. We'd love to hear from you,

0:46:43.040 --> 0:46:44.520
<v Speaker 1>how loud as. That is all we have time for

0:46:44.560 --> 0:46:47.240
<v Speaker 1>this Monday. We have as usual, been all over the place.

0:46:48.040 --> 0:46:51.080
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for being here with us. Today we are

0:46:51.080 --> 0:46:54.640
<v Speaker 1>pulling the lucky out louder who wins the books? So

0:46:54.760 --> 0:46:56.200
<v Speaker 1>on Wednesday we'll be able to.

0:46:56.200 --> 0:46:56.640
<v Speaker 3>Tell you who.

0:46:57.440 --> 0:46:57.640
<v Speaker 2>Yay.

0:46:58.200 --> 0:47:03.200
<v Speaker 1>Until then, we'll see you tomorrow. Bye bye. Mamma Mere

0:47:03.239 --> 0:47:05.800
<v Speaker 1>acknowledges the traditional owners of the land on which we

0:47:05.840 --> 0:47:07.520
<v Speaker 1>have recorded this podcast.