WEBVTT - Sarah Jessica Parker Didn’t See This... Coming

0:00:10.622 --> 0:00:13.342
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to a MoMA Mia podcast.

0:00:13.822 --> 0:00:17.221
<v Speaker 2>Mamma Mia acknowledges the traditional owners of land and waters

0:00:17.222 --> 0:00:18.822
<v Speaker 2>that this podcast is recorded on.

0:00:20.782 --> 0:00:23.701
<v Speaker 3>Welcome to Mamma Mia out Loud, where women come for

0:00:23.782 --> 0:00:24.462
<v Speaker 3>a debrief.

0:00:24.782 --> 0:00:26.422
<v Speaker 2>I'm Holly Wainwright.

0:00:26.142 --> 0:00:28.382
<v Speaker 1>I'm mea Friedman, and I'm Jesse Stevens.

0:00:28.582 --> 0:00:31.501
<v Speaker 3>And here's what made our agenda for today, Friday, the

0:00:31.582 --> 0:00:32.662
<v Speaker 3>twentieth of June.

0:00:32.822 --> 0:00:34.141
<v Speaker 2>Why Sarah Jessica.

0:00:33.781 --> 0:00:35.821
<v Speaker 3>Parker might be one of the few women alive who

0:00:35.902 --> 0:00:39.302
<v Speaker 3>has never watched Carrie Bradshaw have sex, get dressed, or

0:00:39.342 --> 0:00:40.982
<v Speaker 3>type charmingly on a laptop.

0:00:41.101 --> 0:00:44.101
<v Speaker 1>Plus, everyone wants to text less, but nobody wants to

0:00:44.142 --> 0:00:47.622
<v Speaker 1>be left on red And is anyone else exhausted by

0:00:47.702 --> 0:00:49.982
<v Speaker 1>having to be always on? Not just at work but

0:00:50.062 --> 0:00:51.022
<v Speaker 1>with friends and family.

0:00:51.142 --> 0:00:54.022
<v Speaker 4>And we've got some recommendations for you. We are all

0:00:54.062 --> 0:00:57.142
<v Speaker 4>bringing you something to watch this weekend, and we have

0:00:57.222 --> 0:00:59.022
<v Speaker 4>some news. We do great there.

0:00:59.622 --> 0:01:02.822
<v Speaker 1>But first I have a question. Did everyone else know

0:01:03.742 --> 0:01:04.941
<v Speaker 1>that Bluey is a girl?

0:01:05.142 --> 0:01:05.622
<v Speaker 5>Yes? No?

0:01:05.902 --> 0:01:08.062
<v Speaker 4>Yes? What did you think Bluey was a boy?

0:01:08.182 --> 0:01:09.982
<v Speaker 2>I don't watch blue my children too well?

0:01:10.262 --> 0:01:11.862
<v Speaker 4>What did you think blue was a boy?

0:01:11.941 --> 0:01:12.502
<v Speaker 2>I think I did?

0:01:12.581 --> 0:01:14.062
<v Speaker 1>Yes, because blue is a boy's color.

0:01:14.182 --> 0:01:17.102
<v Speaker 4>No, Blue is a girl and has a sister named Bingo.

0:01:17.382 --> 0:01:19.581
<v Speaker 1>My mind is blown. So I kind of thought that

0:01:19.622 --> 0:01:22.982
<v Speaker 1>Bingo was a girl, but I assumed that Bluie was

0:01:23.022 --> 0:01:26.581
<v Speaker 1>a boy, and I learnt it because I also am

0:01:26.622 --> 0:01:30.662
<v Speaker 1>out of the loop of children's programs. But now spending

0:01:30.782 --> 0:01:33.742
<v Speaker 1>more time with my granddaughter, I've very much entered the.

0:01:33.662 --> 0:01:34.262
<v Speaker 2>World of Blue.

0:01:34.302 --> 0:01:36.742
<v Speaker 3>Everybody says it's the best kids TV show I've ever made,

0:01:36.822 --> 0:01:39.782
<v Speaker 3>and it's so successful all over the world.

0:01:39.822 --> 0:01:41.902
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm back in the Wiggles. Goodness, there've been some

0:01:42.022 --> 0:01:44.422
<v Speaker 1>changes there. There's a lot of them now. Yeah, they've

0:01:44.422 --> 0:01:47.422
<v Speaker 1>all got different names. And Jeff isn't around, must have

0:01:47.462 --> 0:01:48.422
<v Speaker 1>gone sleep permanently.

0:01:48.742 --> 0:01:50.022
<v Speaker 2>But Blue is a girl.

0:01:50.102 --> 0:01:50.862
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know that.

0:01:50.982 --> 0:01:53.142
<v Speaker 4>Okay, I have something I need to add because I

0:01:53.222 --> 0:01:56.062
<v Speaker 4>was away with friends over the weekend and there were

0:01:56.062 --> 0:01:58.062
<v Speaker 4>eight of us and two of us didn't know this.

0:01:58.782 --> 0:02:00.742
<v Speaker 4>Did you guys know that oats and porridge were the

0:02:00.742 --> 0:02:04.502
<v Speaker 4>same thing? Yes? Stop it?

0:02:05.022 --> 0:02:06.022
<v Speaker 2>How did you not stop?

0:02:07.462 --> 0:02:10.662
<v Speaker 4>I think that they were thought porridge was likes ludge.

0:02:10.781 --> 0:02:13.501
<v Speaker 4>I thought porridge was like a mucky wet. I thought

0:02:13.501 --> 0:02:14.382
<v Speaker 4>it was just it's.

0:02:14.302 --> 0:02:15.101
<v Speaker 2>Made from oat.

0:02:15.621 --> 0:02:17.382
<v Speaker 1>Where do you think it came from the ground.

0:02:17.822 --> 0:02:20.182
<v Speaker 4>I thought that porridge was the thing you bought and

0:02:20.302 --> 0:02:22.462
<v Speaker 4>oats is the thing you buy. Separate things.

0:02:22.502 --> 0:02:23.862
<v Speaker 1>What did you think you did with oats?

0:02:23.982 --> 0:02:26.142
<v Speaker 4>I thought you made oats.

0:02:26.502 --> 0:02:29.302
<v Speaker 3>Can we revise? He is the smart one, you know

0:02:29.342 --> 0:02:31.381
<v Speaker 3>how that's always nothing. Jesse is the smart one.

0:02:31.582 --> 0:02:32.022
<v Speaker 2>Not today.

0:02:32.702 --> 0:02:35.621
<v Speaker 4>My friend and I were just our minds were absolutely blown.

0:02:36.181 --> 0:02:38.062
<v Speaker 1>Porridge and the same thing.

0:02:38.422 --> 0:02:40.221
<v Speaker 2>Wow, I've been off the show for a couple of days.

0:02:40.262 --> 0:02:42.902
<v Speaker 3>The thing I like the absolute best is that Miya

0:02:43.222 --> 0:02:50.381
<v Speaker 3>thought that they shou rocky.

0:02:50.542 --> 0:02:53.102
<v Speaker 1>Now I've forgotten which it is. Now I'm terrified and

0:02:53.142 --> 0:02:56.022
<v Speaker 1>I'm just going to call him Rihanna's boyfriend my life.

0:02:55.782 --> 0:02:57.582
<v Speaker 3>Which is very out loud of us to just make

0:02:57.622 --> 0:03:02.022
<v Speaker 3>him Rihanna's boyfriend. Anyway, if you had spent decades on

0:03:02.022 --> 0:03:05.022
<v Speaker 3>one of the most iconic TV shows of all time,

0:03:05.181 --> 0:03:09.702
<v Speaker 3>in glorious coture, full hair and makeup and getting to

0:03:09.742 --> 0:03:13.182
<v Speaker 3>snog loads of handsome, craggy guys, wouldn't you want to

0:03:13.382 --> 0:03:14.622
<v Speaker 3>watch yourself doing it?

0:03:14.862 --> 0:03:15.902
<v Speaker 2>No? I would.

0:03:16.622 --> 0:03:22.262
<v Speaker 3>Apparently if you're SJP you definitely wouldn't. And unless you're

0:03:22.262 --> 0:03:25.382
<v Speaker 3>trapped under something heavy, you probably know that she's currently

0:03:25.422 --> 0:03:27.942
<v Speaker 3>starring and executive producer, ing sho we make that a

0:03:27.942 --> 0:03:31.102
<v Speaker 3>thing absolutely, and just like that the Sex and the

0:03:31.142 --> 0:03:34.502
<v Speaker 3>City spin off. People have a lot of opinions about

0:03:34.502 --> 0:03:37.022
<v Speaker 3>that show. They particularly had a lot of opinions about

0:03:37.022 --> 0:03:39.822
<v Speaker 3>something that happened quite early on in this season with

0:03:40.022 --> 0:03:42.982
<v Speaker 3>John Corbet, who plays Aiden in his pickup truck. We

0:03:43.022 --> 0:03:46.342
<v Speaker 3>may have talked about it. Here's Howard Stern asking SJP

0:03:46.622 --> 0:03:49.542
<v Speaker 3>what she thought about that moment that revealed the truth

0:03:49.582 --> 0:03:50.622
<v Speaker 3>that she doesn't watch it.

0:03:50.622 --> 0:03:53.782
<v Speaker 6>It's is such a weird moment where he's having phone

0:03:53.782 --> 0:03:56.182
<v Speaker 6>sex with you and he's about to, you know, play

0:03:56.222 --> 0:03:59.382
<v Speaker 6>with himself when he's talking to you, and he licks

0:03:59.422 --> 0:04:03.022
<v Speaker 6>his hand and he takes his tongue and he starts

0:04:03.062 --> 0:04:05.742
<v Speaker 6>licking his hand and then he plays with his penis.

0:04:06.622 --> 0:04:08.422
<v Speaker 6>Do you know he did that in this thing? Because

0:04:08.422 --> 0:04:10.822
<v Speaker 6>you probably filmed it, And have you seen this scene

0:04:10.822 --> 0:04:11.142
<v Speaker 6>at all?

0:04:11.222 --> 0:04:12.902
<v Speaker 5>No, I've not seen that.

0:04:13.262 --> 0:04:15.342
<v Speaker 6>Is that really true? You really have not seen it?

0:04:15.582 --> 0:04:16.022
<v Speaker 5>Seen it? No?

0:04:19.462 --> 0:04:20.902
<v Speaker 1>I can't comment on that.

0:04:20.942 --> 0:04:22.342
<v Speaker 5>My lawyer has advised me.

0:04:23.462 --> 0:04:24.061
<v Speaker 6>Is that true?

0:04:24.861 --> 0:04:25.902
<v Speaker 1>I have no attorney?

0:04:26.902 --> 0:04:28.302
<v Speaker 6>No? No, But I mean, is it true that you're

0:04:28.381 --> 0:04:30.222
<v Speaker 6>up to you really have no knowledge of it?

0:04:30.421 --> 0:04:34.501
<v Speaker 5>Is I haven't seen most of Sex and the City ever,

0:04:35.101 --> 0:04:38.062
<v Speaker 5>and I haven't seen and just like that. Every now

0:04:38.101 --> 0:04:40.662
<v Speaker 5>and then Michael Patrick will say to me, please watch

0:04:40.702 --> 0:04:44.622
<v Speaker 5>episode you know, so I don't know. This is the

0:04:44.702 --> 0:04:45.902
<v Speaker 5>first I'm hearing about that.

0:04:46.181 --> 0:04:49.581
<v Speaker 1>I found this just weird. I have to say on

0:04:49.621 --> 0:04:52.621
<v Speaker 1>a few levels. First of all, as an executive producer

0:04:52.821 --> 0:04:55.582
<v Speaker 1>on a show, you have to watch it a lot.

0:04:55.902 --> 0:04:59.062
<v Speaker 1>I guess there are different versions of being an executive producer,

0:04:59.501 --> 0:05:03.022
<v Speaker 1>but part of what you do is you make decisions

0:05:03.181 --> 0:05:06.502
<v Speaker 1>early on about casting and about scripts, and then you

0:05:06.582 --> 0:05:10.902
<v Speaker 1>watch the dailies and you watch the edits of the

0:05:10.941 --> 0:05:14.741
<v Speaker 1>show and you give feedback. And she's been an executive

0:05:14.741 --> 0:05:16.981
<v Speaker 1>producer of Sex and the City and now and.

0:05:16.981 --> 0:05:17.381
<v Speaker 2>Just like that.

0:05:17.662 --> 0:05:21.101
<v Speaker 1>So I guess what this is suggesting is that it's

0:05:21.181 --> 0:05:25.621
<v Speaker 1>perhaps a vanity credit or that she inhabits. No, that's

0:05:25.662 --> 0:05:28.262
<v Speaker 1>a really common thing. Sometimes it means that you get

0:05:28.262 --> 0:05:29.702
<v Speaker 1>more money out of the back end, because you can

0:05:29.782 --> 0:05:31.621
<v Speaker 1>charge a fee for being the star, and you charge

0:05:31.621 --> 0:05:35.101
<v Speaker 1>a fee for being the executive producer. But interestingly, one

0:05:35.101 --> 0:05:39.141
<v Speaker 1>of the reasons that Kim Ktrall, who played Samantha, gave

0:05:39.501 --> 0:05:41.941
<v Speaker 1>for wanting to not come back is that she said, well,

0:05:42.022 --> 0:05:44.901
<v Speaker 1>Sarah Jessica Parker was an executive producer. I feel like

0:05:44.941 --> 0:05:48.301
<v Speaker 1>we all should have been, and just like that, Cynthia

0:05:48.381 --> 0:05:50.662
<v Speaker 1>Nixon who plays Miranda, and christ And Davis who plays

0:05:50.782 --> 0:05:52.582
<v Speaker 1>Charlotte both are executive producers.

0:05:52.662 --> 0:05:54.822
<v Speaker 3>I don't think it's vanity though, because I think that

0:05:54.861 --> 0:05:59.101
<v Speaker 3>Sarah Jessica Parker is interested in different things. So if

0:05:59.142 --> 0:06:01.661
<v Speaker 3>you listen, for example, I remember there was a little

0:06:01.782 --> 0:06:04.101
<v Speaker 3>doco about and just like that in the first season

0:06:04.181 --> 0:06:08.222
<v Speaker 3>where they talked about how obsessive she was about Carrie's closet,

0:06:08.421 --> 0:06:10.462
<v Speaker 3>Like I don't mean literally the clothes, but the way

0:06:10.501 --> 0:06:12.741
<v Speaker 3>it would be organized, the apartments, the way this would

0:06:12.741 --> 0:06:14.782
<v Speaker 3>be there and this would be there, and in a

0:06:14.782 --> 0:06:17.942
<v Speaker 3>little code the set dresses made it sound like it

0:06:17.981 --> 0:06:20.061
<v Speaker 3>was kind of a punish, you know what I mean.

0:06:20.421 --> 0:06:23.142
<v Speaker 3>I think that there are things that Sarah Jessica Parker

0:06:23.301 --> 0:06:28.341
<v Speaker 3>is incredibly detailed focused on, but the end result doesn't

0:06:28.381 --> 0:06:30.301
<v Speaker 3>seem like it's that, do you understand it?

0:06:30.421 --> 0:06:33.382
<v Speaker 4>I wonder if this is how you survive fifty years

0:06:33.381 --> 0:06:36.061
<v Speaker 4>in the industry is by not watching it, And I

0:06:36.181 --> 0:06:39.582
<v Speaker 4>reckon that a lot of actors when they sit down

0:06:39.621 --> 0:06:42.702
<v Speaker 4>at a premiere or when their film is released or whatever.

0:06:42.821 --> 0:06:44.901
<v Speaker 4>I don't reckon that they've watched it. I think that

0:06:45.342 --> 0:06:47.381
<v Speaker 4>we hear a lot of creatives talk about the process

0:06:47.541 --> 0:06:52.101
<v Speaker 4>and not necessarily being connected to the outcome. And I

0:06:52.381 --> 0:06:56.501
<v Speaker 4>just reckon that she is very invested in story. She's

0:06:56.541 --> 0:07:00.381
<v Speaker 4>a Booker Prize judge this year. I think she really

0:07:00.421 --> 0:07:03.501
<v Speaker 4>cares about words. She's a lover of like literary fiction

0:07:03.582 --> 0:07:04.302
<v Speaker 4>and that kind of thing.

0:07:04.941 --> 0:07:06.061
<v Speaker 1>She's got a book in print.

0:07:06.222 --> 0:07:09.222
<v Speaker 3>She's got a book imprint which has many as one

0:07:09.262 --> 0:07:10.262
<v Speaker 3>of her many things.

0:07:10.381 --> 0:07:11.102
<v Speaker 4>Yes, So I.

0:07:11.022 --> 0:07:13.342
<v Speaker 1>Love talking about books, and she is a big advocate

0:07:13.381 --> 0:07:16.222
<v Speaker 1>for public libraries. And she talks about growing up. She's

0:07:16.262 --> 0:07:18.422
<v Speaker 1>one of like eight or nine kids, and she was

0:07:18.462 --> 0:07:20.502
<v Speaker 1>never allowed to leave the house, none of them unless

0:07:20.502 --> 0:07:21.342
<v Speaker 1>they had a book with them.

0:07:21.462 --> 0:07:21.622
<v Speaker 6>Oh.

0:07:21.662 --> 0:07:24.742
<v Speaker 4>I love that. Can we please talk about the other

0:07:24.821 --> 0:07:27.422
<v Speaker 4>tidbit that has come out of this press tour, which

0:07:27.462 --> 0:07:30.901
<v Speaker 4>is that Sarah Jessica Parker alleges that she reads up

0:07:30.941 --> 0:07:31.662
<v Speaker 4>to two books a day.

0:07:31.902 --> 0:07:34.381
<v Speaker 2>Many books do you read a week or a month?

0:07:34.702 --> 0:07:37.782
<v Speaker 7>Well, right now I'm judging the Booker. So I'm reading

0:07:38.862 --> 0:07:42.262
<v Speaker 7>two books today. Sometimes it's an honor, it's a privilege.

0:07:42.302 --> 0:07:47.702
<v Speaker 7>It's intense to be reading this the volume. Iss, it's

0:07:47.821 --> 0:07:50.662
<v Speaker 7>kind of hard to convey what it's like to have

0:07:51.222 --> 0:07:54.182
<v Speaker 7>as many books as we are given the opportunity to

0:07:54.222 --> 0:07:57.382
<v Speaker 7>read a book. Yeah, it's quite something.

0:07:57.542 --> 0:07:58.382
<v Speaker 4>What do we make of that?

0:07:58.542 --> 0:08:00.542
<v Speaker 3>Well, I've listened to interviews with her before where she

0:08:00.582 --> 0:08:03.862
<v Speaker 3>says that she reads constantly. She's not a social media person, right,

0:08:03.902 --> 0:08:05.701
<v Speaker 3>we all know that she's not a phone person. She

0:08:05.742 --> 0:08:07.662
<v Speaker 3>probably doesn't even have a phone. She's one of those

0:08:07.742 --> 0:08:10.542
<v Speaker 3>I think and shed.

0:08:09.742 --> 0:08:11.742
<v Speaker 1>It's like a giant Jane Nelson character. And she often

0:08:11.821 --> 0:08:12.662
<v Speaker 1>talks a bit like that.

0:08:12.862 --> 0:08:13.302
<v Speaker 2>She does.

0:08:13.662 --> 0:08:15.422
<v Speaker 3>And she says that she reads in the makeup chair.

0:08:15.462 --> 0:08:17.462
<v Speaker 3>Imagine how much time she spends in a makeup chair

0:08:17.502 --> 0:08:20.182
<v Speaker 3>and has done for fifty years. She says that she

0:08:20.222 --> 0:08:22.381
<v Speaker 3>reads on the subway, she reads all the time, she

0:08:22.422 --> 0:08:25.342
<v Speaker 3>reads between takes. She sounds very much like that is

0:08:25.381 --> 0:08:28.622
<v Speaker 3>her passion. And if you are a book of Prize Judge,

0:08:28.622 --> 0:08:30.102
<v Speaker 3>I can't believe she's a Book of Prize Jge.

0:08:30.142 --> 0:08:31.902
<v Speaker 2>That is such a flex go SJP.

0:08:32.102 --> 0:08:35.742
<v Speaker 3>It's such a prestigious literary award in the world, and

0:08:36.142 --> 0:08:38.142
<v Speaker 3>you have to read all the books.

0:08:38.302 --> 0:08:40.222
<v Speaker 4>And makes will That's what she said is she's just

0:08:40.262 --> 0:08:42.862
<v Speaker 4>come off obviously season three of and just like that,

0:08:42.942 --> 0:08:45.622
<v Speaker 4>she's in a period of her career where then she

0:08:45.662 --> 0:08:48.142
<v Speaker 4>has some downtime, so of course she has capacity. I'm like,

0:08:48.342 --> 0:08:50.622
<v Speaker 4>that's the dream to read two books a day.

0:08:50.702 --> 0:08:53.342
<v Speaker 1>But Holly's right, even when you're working as an actor,

0:08:53.702 --> 0:08:55.822
<v Speaker 1>there is so much downtime. That's one of the reasons

0:08:55.822 --> 0:08:58.062
<v Speaker 1>that I can't handle television. And I only went to

0:08:58.062 --> 0:09:01.182
<v Speaker 1>the set one time. There is so much waiting, so

0:09:01.302 --> 0:09:03.462
<v Speaker 1>much waiting. I was listening to the and just like

0:09:03.542 --> 0:09:06.982
<v Speaker 1>that podcast with Michael Patrick King, who is the big

0:09:07.022 --> 0:09:09.502
<v Speaker 1>boss of the show, and he was talking about this

0:09:09.622 --> 0:09:12.702
<v Speaker 1>scene in episode I think it's either two or three

0:09:12.782 --> 0:09:29.062
<v Speaker 1>with the rats I love them, And that was actually

0:09:29.262 --> 0:09:32.102
<v Speaker 1>filmed on the sound stage and they had to keep

0:09:32.542 --> 0:09:35.102
<v Speaker 1>gathering all the rats that I've assumed they were cgr rats.

0:09:35.102 --> 0:09:38.022
<v Speaker 1>They had to gather all the rats and then release

0:09:38.102 --> 0:09:39.942
<v Speaker 1>them again and again, and each time they were trying

0:09:39.942 --> 0:09:41.302
<v Speaker 1>to do that, it took ages and it was two

0:09:41.302 --> 0:09:44.062
<v Speaker 1>o'clock in the morning. You know, so, Carrie, Oh, sorry,

0:09:44.102 --> 0:09:45.942
<v Speaker 1>Satan's ca Park. It does have a lot of time.

0:09:46.062 --> 0:09:48.742
<v Speaker 3>The thing that's shocking to people about this, I think

0:09:48.742 --> 0:09:51.662
<v Speaker 3>about the idea she doesn't watch it is because Jesse's right.

0:09:51.702 --> 0:09:53.342
<v Speaker 3>Lots of actors say they don't watch their work. For

0:09:53.382 --> 0:09:54.862
<v Speaker 3>a lot of them, it's part of their process, Like

0:09:54.942 --> 0:09:56.782
<v Speaker 3>they're like, I do the work and then I have

0:09:56.862 --> 0:10:00.062
<v Speaker 3>to disassociate, which seems very well adjusted, but also a

0:10:00.102 --> 0:10:01.982
<v Speaker 3>tiny bit arrogant in a way, because you learn when

0:10:02.022 --> 0:10:03.702
<v Speaker 3>you watch yourself back, right, But I guess if you've

0:10:03.702 --> 0:10:05.262
<v Speaker 3>been doing it for fifty years, maybe you don't need to.

0:10:05.702 --> 0:10:08.822
<v Speaker 3>But the thing that makes this so strange is Carrie

0:10:08.862 --> 0:10:11.942
<v Speaker 3>Bradshaw is someone that we all know so well. I

0:10:11.982 --> 0:10:13.542
<v Speaker 3>was thinking about it. I don't think there is a

0:10:13.542 --> 0:10:16.302
<v Speaker 3>fictional character that I have probably spent more time with

0:10:16.462 --> 0:10:19.542
<v Speaker 3>in my entire life than Carrie Bradshaw. And so to

0:10:19.622 --> 0:10:22.702
<v Speaker 3>most of us, s JP is Carrie Bradshaw, and it's

0:10:22.782 --> 0:10:25.142
<v Speaker 3>like she's someone that we all know really well. But

0:10:25.182 --> 0:10:27.262
<v Speaker 3>it's like s JP's never met her, you know what

0:10:27.262 --> 0:10:30.182
<v Speaker 3>I mean, Like she doesn't view her the way we

0:10:30.302 --> 0:10:30.702
<v Speaker 3>view her.

0:10:30.742 --> 0:10:33.902
<v Speaker 1>Have you ever listened to Kristin Davis's podcast it's called

0:10:37.262 --> 0:10:41.302
<v Speaker 1>It's Really Weird, and she's very elevated. But anyway, when

0:10:41.302 --> 0:10:43.662
<v Speaker 1>she has s JP on, the whole episode is just

0:10:43.742 --> 0:10:47.182
<v Speaker 1>her explaining to s JP what happened on the show.

0:10:47.702 --> 0:10:50.342
<v Speaker 1>I'm serious, but I have a question for you both

0:10:50.382 --> 0:10:52.222
<v Speaker 1>in terms of it's one thing not to watch you

0:10:52.342 --> 0:10:54.742
<v Speaker 1>work back, and a lot of actors don't I get it.

0:10:55.182 --> 0:10:58.542
<v Speaker 1>We should technically listen back to every episode of this show.

0:10:58.902 --> 0:10:59.542
<v Speaker 1>I don't do.

0:10:59.582 --> 0:10:59.942
<v Speaker 6>You know.

0:11:00.422 --> 0:11:02.782
<v Speaker 3>I go through phases where I do it is the

0:11:02.822 --> 0:11:05.381
<v Speaker 3>way you learn, And then I go through phases where

0:11:05.422 --> 0:11:07.982
<v Speaker 3>I'm like, I couldn't think of anything worse having to

0:11:08.022 --> 0:11:10.342
<v Speaker 3>listen to me because I just go listen to them.

0:11:10.422 --> 0:11:12.542
<v Speaker 3>Number of times I did that, listen to the way

0:11:12.582 --> 0:11:15.422
<v Speaker 3>I said that highly critical And that's what I've heard

0:11:15.422 --> 0:11:17.782
<v Speaker 3>as JP say is I would hate myself, and I've

0:11:17.822 --> 0:11:20.462
<v Speaker 3>heard Reese Witherspoon say the same thing. I would go

0:11:20.502 --> 0:11:22.822
<v Speaker 3>into a self hating spiral. All I can see is

0:11:22.862 --> 0:11:25.342
<v Speaker 3>all the choices I didn't make, all the mistakes I made,

0:11:25.542 --> 0:11:27.582
<v Speaker 3>And I get that, right, Yeah, I.

0:11:27.542 --> 0:11:28.102
<v Speaker 2>Get that too.

0:11:28.142 --> 0:11:30.982
<v Speaker 1>But my question is it's one thing not watching you

0:11:31.062 --> 0:11:34.022
<v Speaker 1>work back, but as an executive producer and star of

0:11:34.062 --> 0:11:38.302
<v Speaker 1>a show, when the whole cultural conversation in the reaction

0:11:38.542 --> 0:11:41.782
<v Speaker 1>to your episode was about the lickic we spoke about it,

0:11:41.822 --> 0:11:44.102
<v Speaker 1>and the week before it was about the funny puppet

0:11:44.142 --> 0:11:47.382
<v Speaker 1>um habit she was wearing. Do you really think she

0:11:47.462 --> 0:11:49.742
<v Speaker 1>doesn't know that? Do you really think she's not aware of.

0:11:49.662 --> 0:11:52.902
<v Speaker 4>The crit conversation? She doesn't know it. And what we

0:11:52.982 --> 0:11:55.342
<v Speaker 4>need to remember is that Sarah Jessica Parker is the

0:11:55.422 --> 0:11:59.102
<v Speaker 4>antithesis of Carrie Bradshaw and for the twenty years of

0:11:59.422 --> 0:12:02.662
<v Speaker 4>The Sex and the City Cannon she has sat down

0:12:02.662 --> 0:12:04.822
<v Speaker 4>for interviews, even the Howard Sterne one was a perfect

0:12:04.822 --> 0:12:08.262
<v Speaker 4>example to be asked questions that I believe make her uncomfortable.

0:12:08.422 --> 0:12:10.102
<v Speaker 4>I don't think she likes talk about.

0:12:10.102 --> 0:12:12.702
<v Speaker 1>Why did she go on Howard Sterne. I, Oh, she didn't.

0:12:12.742 --> 0:12:14.502
<v Speaker 2>That's what she's done it for years.

0:12:14.542 --> 0:12:17.262
<v Speaker 1>But that's what he does. Right as we know, promoting

0:12:17.462 --> 0:12:20.502
<v Speaker 1>a piece of work, a movie album, a TV show

0:12:20.862 --> 0:12:22.422
<v Speaker 1>is very different to what it used to be. You know,

0:12:22.542 --> 0:12:24.942
<v Speaker 1>in the nineties and the early two thousands, you do

0:12:25.142 --> 0:12:27.622
<v Speaker 1>a high profile interview with Vogue, Vanity Fair, you might

0:12:27.622 --> 0:12:30.302
<v Speaker 1>do a cover, you might do a couple of newspaper interviews,

0:12:30.422 --> 0:12:33.382
<v Speaker 1>a couple of TV interviews, one of those junkets. But

0:12:33.542 --> 0:12:36.382
<v Speaker 1>now you've got to go on a chicken shop date

0:12:36.462 --> 0:12:39.822
<v Speaker 1>with ameliads Moldenberg. You've got to eat hot wings for BuzzFeed.

0:12:39.982 --> 0:12:41.742
<v Speaker 1>You've got to go and talk to Howard Stern about

0:12:41.742 --> 0:12:43.542
<v Speaker 1>your sex life. You've got to sit down with call

0:12:43.542 --> 0:12:45.702
<v Speaker 1>her daddy Alex Creeper and talk about your abortion.

0:12:45.822 --> 0:12:48.902
<v Speaker 2>It's like, I don't think you have to if you're SJP.

0:12:49.222 --> 0:12:51.302
<v Speaker 3>I was thinking about this because you're so right that

0:12:51.582 --> 0:12:54.142
<v Speaker 3>whether or not the actor or the producer chooses to

0:12:54.222 --> 0:12:58.182
<v Speaker 3>engage with the conversation. Think about White lotus right, they

0:12:58.222 --> 0:13:00.662
<v Speaker 3>say that Mike White is really into that.

0:13:00.862 --> 0:13:01.462
<v Speaker 2>He loves that.

0:13:02.022 --> 0:13:04.022
<v Speaker 3>But also you can see some of the breakout stars

0:13:04.022 --> 0:13:06.342
<v Speaker 3>of this recent series loved it, like Walton Goggins, Oh

0:13:06.382 --> 0:13:08.462
<v Speaker 3>my God, Like he was the guy who played Rick.

0:13:08.582 --> 0:13:12.182
<v Speaker 3>Now he's said, lean into that so Hardy popped up everywhere.

0:13:12.342 --> 0:13:15.222
<v Speaker 3>Patrick Schwuerzner was everywhere. Patrick Schwarznegger was everywhere. They were

0:13:15.302 --> 0:13:17.622
<v Speaker 3>leaning into it really hard. They were part of that conversation.

0:13:18.342 --> 0:13:21.862
<v Speaker 3>And I think that an actor at the level of SJP,

0:13:22.062 --> 0:13:24.342
<v Speaker 3>who lets be clear, we reference some of the businesses

0:13:24.382 --> 0:13:27.422
<v Speaker 3>she has, it's not like she needs the money. I

0:13:27.462 --> 0:13:30.662
<v Speaker 3>think she genuinely sees it as work and herself very separately,

0:13:30.702 --> 0:13:33.502
<v Speaker 3>and she would be like, I will do four pieces

0:13:33.502 --> 0:13:34.102
<v Speaker 3>of content.

0:13:34.182 --> 0:13:37.942
<v Speaker 1>Well, you're contractually obliged to promote a show when you're

0:13:37.942 --> 0:13:40.182
<v Speaker 1>the star, and the whole point of the show is

0:13:40.342 --> 0:13:43.102
<v Speaker 1>very much around her, and it's sold around her. But

0:13:43.222 --> 0:13:45.862
<v Speaker 1>I do feel it's a little bit disingenuous. Well maybe

0:13:45.862 --> 0:13:49.142
<v Speaker 1>that's just her stick that her publicist didn't go, Hey,

0:13:49.342 --> 0:13:52.102
<v Speaker 1>Howard Stone's probably gonna ask you about the handlicking scene.

0:13:52.182 --> 0:13:54.022
<v Speaker 4>The more I learn about her, the more I love her.

0:13:54.142 --> 0:13:55.222
<v Speaker 1>I think she's fascinating.

0:13:55.302 --> 0:13:57.302
<v Speaker 4>I love her. I think she's the perfect celebrity. There

0:13:57.342 --> 0:13:59.662
<v Speaker 4>was this great anecdote that she told about being in

0:13:59.702 --> 0:14:02.982
<v Speaker 4>an airport. Robbie Williams recently talked about this, having people

0:14:02.982 --> 0:14:05.222
<v Speaker 4>come up and wanting to get a photo, and because

0:14:05.382 --> 0:14:08.222
<v Speaker 4>Sarah Jessica Parker has we believe, never owned a phone,

0:14:08.342 --> 0:14:11.422
<v Speaker 4>she doesn't know what's happening, and she will turn to them.

0:14:11.422 --> 0:14:12.702
<v Speaker 4>And she said, I turned to this woman in the

0:14:12.742 --> 0:14:14.982
<v Speaker 4>airport and said, you have not even said hello to me.

0:14:15.622 --> 0:14:17.622
<v Speaker 4>What I will give you is a conversation, and it

0:14:17.622 --> 0:14:19.622
<v Speaker 4>will be a lot more meaningful than a selfie. I

0:14:19.702 --> 0:14:20.702
<v Speaker 4>just kind of love her.

0:14:20.902 --> 0:14:24.422
<v Speaker 1>She's like from another tongue. I am worried about her

0:14:24.462 --> 0:14:26.382
<v Speaker 1>a little bit in the show. She looks pretty miserable.

0:14:26.542 --> 0:14:28.822
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it would be right that her character would

0:14:28.862 --> 0:14:32.182
<v Speaker 1>be depressed. She's a widow. I think, you know, Big

0:14:32.222 --> 0:14:33.502
<v Speaker 1>didn't die that long ago.

0:14:33.742 --> 0:14:35.662
<v Speaker 2>So funny, That's not how I'm reading it at all.

0:14:35.822 --> 0:14:38.942
<v Speaker 3>I'm really enjoying watching her be sword of single again,

0:14:39.222 --> 0:14:41.782
<v Speaker 3>Like I'm loving seeing her in that house. I'm loving

0:14:41.822 --> 0:14:45.022
<v Speaker 3>seeing her evolve. I think I loved actually the episode

0:14:45.062 --> 0:14:48.582
<v Speaker 3>where she went to Virginia and Aidan's family, because she's

0:14:48.662 --> 0:14:50.302
<v Speaker 3>talked about this, and I think it's true. I know

0:14:50.342 --> 0:14:52.782
<v Speaker 3>everyone hates Carrie, and I'm a vigorous carry apologist.

0:14:52.902 --> 0:14:55.902
<v Speaker 1>Not everyone hates Carrie. She's very polarizing, polarized, but there

0:14:55.902 --> 0:14:58.822
<v Speaker 1>are like entire websites about like why people should hate

0:14:58.822 --> 0:15:01.822
<v Speaker 1>her so much. I actually really like Carrie, and I

0:15:01.862 --> 0:15:04.502
<v Speaker 1>also think that she has changed, and she has you

0:15:04.542 --> 0:15:07.142
<v Speaker 1>think she's I think she's changed, and I think she's going.

0:15:07.582 --> 0:15:09.502
<v Speaker 1>Like what they're trying to show in this these are

0:15:09.542 --> 0:15:12.862
<v Speaker 1>episodes is like her going to Virginia and understanding, actually

0:15:12.942 --> 0:15:15.182
<v Speaker 1>understanding what it means that Aiden has a family rather

0:15:15.222 --> 0:15:17.902
<v Speaker 1>than just the concept of it, you know, and kind

0:15:17.942 --> 0:15:19.022
<v Speaker 1>of tasting.

0:15:18.622 --> 0:15:20.142
<v Speaker 3>That and being like, do I want to be part

0:15:20.142 --> 0:15:23.902
<v Speaker 3>of that? I love the handsome rider downstairs. I'm very

0:15:23.902 --> 0:15:24.262
<v Speaker 3>into it.

0:15:24.342 --> 0:15:26.702
<v Speaker 4>She made a point to about the Carrie hate and

0:15:26.742 --> 0:15:29.702
<v Speaker 4>how there are television shows that have been made about

0:15:29.902 --> 0:15:32.742
<v Speaker 4>mass murderers, you know, a male mass murderer who doesn't

0:15:32.742 --> 0:15:35.982
<v Speaker 4>get half the hate that Carrie Bradshaw does, and how

0:15:35.982 --> 0:15:40.502
<v Speaker 4>there is something deeply sexist about our reading of Carrie.

0:15:40.502 --> 0:15:41.902
<v Speaker 4>And I think that that's very true.

0:15:42.222 --> 0:15:45.222
<v Speaker 1>Is it sexist or is it that we you know,

0:15:45.302 --> 0:15:50.062
<v Speaker 1>we talked on Monday Show about how when people find

0:15:50.062 --> 0:15:53.542
<v Speaker 1>out who their trolls are, it's often someone who's essentially

0:15:53.622 --> 0:15:54.102
<v Speaker 1>jealous of that.

0:15:54.222 --> 0:15:56.662
<v Speaker 4>I don't think we know what to do with complicated I.

0:15:56.542 --> 0:15:59.582
<v Speaker 1>Don't mean jealous necessarily of Carrie. But is it sexist

0:15:59.662 --> 0:16:01.582
<v Speaker 1>or is it what Holly was saying in that we've

0:16:01.582 --> 0:16:04.502
<v Speaker 1>spent so much time we identify with this character, you

0:16:04.502 --> 0:16:05.942
<v Speaker 1>know that whole thing. Are you a Charlotte?

0:16:05.982 --> 0:16:06.502
<v Speaker 2>Are you carry?

0:16:06.502 --> 0:16:09.382
<v Speaker 1>And everyone wanted to be a Carrie that when they

0:16:09.622 --> 0:16:13.102
<v Speaker 1>behave in ways that we don't like, we feel personally.

0:16:12.622 --> 0:16:16.062
<v Speaker 4>Betrayed or do like breaking bad or something like. There

0:16:16.062 --> 0:16:19.102
<v Speaker 4>are shows about complicated men and we follow them every

0:16:19.142 --> 0:16:21.382
<v Speaker 4>step and go I still like him? Has he killed

0:16:21.422 --> 0:16:22.222
<v Speaker 4>forty five people?

0:16:22.422 --> 0:16:22.742
<v Speaker 2>Sure?

0:16:22.902 --> 0:16:27.462
<v Speaker 4>Whereas Carrie makes a morally dubious decision and we go.

0:16:28.142 --> 0:16:29.342
<v Speaker 4>I think that's some wrong with her.

0:16:29.462 --> 0:16:31.702
<v Speaker 3>This is the thing about likable women, right, is that

0:16:32.262 --> 0:16:34.422
<v Speaker 3>I like a lot of women, and some of my

0:16:34.422 --> 0:16:38.422
<v Speaker 3>great friends, and I'm certain also me who are not perfect,

0:16:38.462 --> 0:16:40.982
<v Speaker 3>and who makes selfish decisions sometimes and who sometimes are

0:16:40.982 --> 0:16:43.062
<v Speaker 3>a bit annoying and sometimes are a bit self obsessed

0:16:43.102 --> 0:16:45.502
<v Speaker 3>and sometimes go out with the wrong guy. Like, that's

0:16:45.542 --> 0:16:48.662
<v Speaker 3>what we're actually like. And so I think that all

0:16:48.702 --> 0:16:50.982
<v Speaker 3>the things you can throw at a carry that aren't real,

0:16:51.182 --> 0:16:54.622
<v Speaker 3>you know, obviously obviously, the wardrobe, the money, all that stuff.

0:16:55.182 --> 0:16:57.462
<v Speaker 3>Actually the fact that she's a bit annoying sometimes is

0:16:57.462 --> 0:16:59.662
<v Speaker 3>the most real thing about her. She's also very funny.

0:16:59.702 --> 0:17:01.542
<v Speaker 3>I love watching her. I think she gets the best lines.

0:17:01.662 --> 0:17:03.582
<v Speaker 3>I like the lines on her face and on the edge.

0:17:03.582 --> 0:17:04.302
<v Speaker 4>I'm a big fan.

0:17:04.581 --> 0:17:07.822
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think the criticism when I feel frustrated with her,

0:17:07.821 --> 0:17:11.381
<v Speaker 1>it's because she hasn't evolved, not because she has. Like

0:17:11.422 --> 0:17:14.821
<v Speaker 1>the whole thing with the shoes just feels so one note,

0:17:14.901 --> 0:17:17.661
<v Speaker 1>and the you know that whole storyline where it was

0:17:17.702 --> 0:17:19.981
<v Speaker 1>the thumbs up emoji or the thumbs down, like it

0:17:20.101 --> 0:17:24.061
<v Speaker 1>just seems very stuck in the nineties, both with her

0:17:24.061 --> 0:17:26.581
<v Speaker 1>cultural references, you know, when she was like, oh little

0:17:26.581 --> 0:17:30.542
<v Speaker 1>house on the carry instead of there's no trad wife reference.

0:17:30.581 --> 0:17:33.581
<v Speaker 1>It's almost like she exists, not in this world.

0:17:33.621 --> 0:17:35.421
<v Speaker 2>But I think she does. Carry.

0:17:35.502 --> 0:17:39.141
<v Speaker 3>Isn't a TikTok person, Not every woman who certainly the

0:17:39.262 --> 0:17:42.702
<v Speaker 3>age that she is as plugged into the zeitgeist as

0:17:42.742 --> 0:17:45.742
<v Speaker 3>you are. I mean, as cool and relevant and youthful

0:17:45.742 --> 0:17:46.782
<v Speaker 3>as you are, my friend.

0:17:47.942 --> 0:17:51.061
<v Speaker 1>After the break, what is an acceptable amount of time

0:17:51.262 --> 0:17:56.022
<v Speaker 1>to wait until you text someone back. There've been a

0:17:56.022 --> 0:18:01.942
<v Speaker 1>few stories and newsletters and conversations in the zeitgeist over

0:18:01.982 --> 0:18:05.621
<v Speaker 1>the last couple of months about the volume of texting

0:18:06.222 --> 0:18:09.061
<v Speaker 1>that we are becoming accustomed to. The latest of these

0:18:09.101 --> 0:18:11.902
<v Speaker 1>is an article that was written in New York Magazine

0:18:12.061 --> 0:18:15.341
<v Speaker 1>by the author Catherine jess and Morton, who has little kids,

0:18:15.381 --> 0:18:19.462
<v Speaker 1>and she was talking about the burden of texting for parents,

0:18:19.861 --> 0:18:22.302
<v Speaker 1>and she talks about now, when you have a play date,

0:18:22.901 --> 0:18:29.182
<v Speaker 1>the other parent expects constant updates via text, photos, videos

0:18:29.222 --> 0:18:33.262
<v Speaker 1>of what's happening. And she says that she finds that

0:18:33.581 --> 0:18:37.581
<v Speaker 1>like completely counterintuitive and like a real burden, because she said,

0:18:37.621 --> 0:18:40.941
<v Speaker 1>the point of me having another kid over is so

0:18:40.982 --> 0:18:42.861
<v Speaker 1>that my kid can play and I can get some

0:18:42.901 --> 0:18:45.421
<v Speaker 1>other stuff done, and vice versa. For my kid's at

0:18:45.422 --> 0:18:47.502
<v Speaker 1>someone else's house. I don't want to have to be

0:18:47.581 --> 0:18:51.221
<v Speaker 1>responding to constant updates about how they're going.

0:18:51.502 --> 0:18:54.222
<v Speaker 4>She called it maternal self soothing, which I thought was

0:18:54.262 --> 0:18:58.542
<v Speaker 4>a really, really good phrase. It's almost pacifying for the

0:18:58.581 --> 0:19:01.741
<v Speaker 4>person doing it to feel as though every time they

0:19:01.782 --> 0:19:04.621
<v Speaker 4>have an anxious thought about their child or they worry,

0:19:04.661 --> 0:19:07.061
<v Speaker 4>they almost want to perform the fact they're thinking about

0:19:07.061 --> 0:19:07.621
<v Speaker 4>their child.

0:19:07.821 --> 0:19:08.382
<v Speaker 2>Well, it was.

0:19:08.341 --> 0:19:11.622
<v Speaker 1>Interesting because I had Luna for the weekend and you're away, Jesse,

0:19:12.422 --> 0:19:15.422
<v Speaker 1>and when I have her, I do have that track

0:19:15.542 --> 0:19:18.661
<v Speaker 1>going in my mind. I should capture this on video,

0:19:18.782 --> 0:19:19.661
<v Speaker 1>I should capture this one.

0:19:19.702 --> 0:19:21.262
<v Speaker 4>And I have a track going in my mind that

0:19:21.422 --> 0:19:23.901
<v Speaker 4>if I haven't checked in a few hours. Do people

0:19:23.901 --> 0:19:25.262
<v Speaker 4>think I'm not thinking about her?

0:19:25.542 --> 0:19:28.222
<v Speaker 1>Yes? And I did think that. And I even said

0:19:28.702 --> 0:19:30.341
<v Speaker 1>to Luca when I spoke to someone, like, what are

0:19:30.341 --> 0:19:32.942
<v Speaker 1>you guys up to? You're not behaving in the normal way.

0:19:33.262 --> 0:19:35.502
<v Speaker 1>You're not texting as often as you do, because usually

0:19:35.542 --> 0:19:38.222
<v Speaker 1>when I've got her, it's like how is she? Especially

0:19:38.222 --> 0:19:41.542
<v Speaker 1>from him? Actually, anyway, it just turned out that you

0:19:41.621 --> 0:19:43.462
<v Speaker 1>were just having a brain time.

0:19:43.782 --> 0:19:45.542
<v Speaker 3>So when you just said I did think that. I

0:19:45.542 --> 0:19:47.782
<v Speaker 3>don't think that Jesse didn't care about her daughter anymore.

0:19:47.982 --> 0:19:50.262
<v Speaker 1>No, I thought that they were to say kind of

0:19:50.302 --> 0:19:53.941
<v Speaker 1>Shenanigan's weird sex weekend or something. I didn't know what

0:19:54.061 --> 0:19:57.901
<v Speaker 1>was going on. And then also I'm like, well, why

0:19:57.901 --> 0:20:00.821
<v Speaker 1>do I keep texting? Do I keep texting to show

0:20:00.861 --> 0:20:02.341
<v Speaker 1>you how much fun she's having?

0:20:02.821 --> 0:20:03.581
<v Speaker 2>Is that about me?

0:20:04.182 --> 0:20:07.342
<v Speaker 1>Or is that about making you feel better? It's an

0:20:07.341 --> 0:20:10.382
<v Speaker 1>interesting thing, But she says also, because when your kids

0:20:10.422 --> 0:20:12.341
<v Speaker 1>are too young to have a phone, you choose not

0:20:12.422 --> 0:20:15.662
<v Speaker 1>to give them a phone. All of this parent communication,

0:20:15.901 --> 0:20:18.941
<v Speaker 1>the WhatsApp groups, the messages through playdates, the organizing of

0:20:18.942 --> 0:20:23.101
<v Speaker 1>the social things falls disproportionately on the mother. So that's

0:20:23.302 --> 0:20:26.381
<v Speaker 1>the parenting side of it. But then there's also the

0:20:26.422 --> 0:20:29.862
<v Speaker 1>group texts. Caroline o'donahue wrote a piece in her newsletter

0:20:29.901 --> 0:20:33.542
<v Speaker 1>a few weeks ago saying everyone wants to text less,

0:20:33.661 --> 0:20:36.582
<v Speaker 1>but nobody wants to be left on red. What did

0:20:36.621 --> 0:20:37.182
<v Speaker 1>you think of that?

0:20:37.581 --> 0:20:40.621
<v Speaker 3>It's one hundred percent true. We all are obsessed with

0:20:40.942 --> 0:20:44.101
<v Speaker 3>being off our phones more, but we all demand instant

0:20:44.222 --> 0:20:45.742
<v Speaker 3>responses to anything that.

0:20:45.702 --> 0:20:46.502
<v Speaker 2>We put out there.

0:20:46.542 --> 0:20:50.462
<v Speaker 3>So what I loved, particularly about what Caroline o'donahue wrote,

0:20:50.462 --> 0:20:53.061
<v Speaker 3>which I really related to, is that she basically was

0:20:53.061 --> 0:20:55.302
<v Speaker 3>saying that she was a bad texter, and she sort

0:20:55.341 --> 0:20:56.901
<v Speaker 3>of threw out a few reasons of why she was

0:20:56.901 --> 0:20:58.821
<v Speaker 3>a bad texter, and then she wrote this, She said,

0:20:58.861 --> 0:21:01.222
<v Speaker 3>The thing is, I don't really want to be better

0:21:01.262 --> 0:21:03.222
<v Speaker 3>at it. I'm bad at texting. I don't want to

0:21:03.222 --> 0:21:04.901
<v Speaker 3>be good at it. I hate my phone, and so

0:21:05.022 --> 0:21:07.502
<v Speaker 3>do you. I feel vulgar and sick when I spend

0:21:07.581 --> 0:21:10.262
<v Speaker 3>too much time on it, and a never to Texting

0:21:10.341 --> 0:21:13.661
<v Speaker 3>takes time. But equally, I don't want to hurt anyone's feelings,

0:21:13.901 --> 0:21:16.581
<v Speaker 3>particularly the feelings of people I genuinely care about. It

0:21:16.581 --> 0:21:19.741
<v Speaker 3>shouldn't be a problem, and yet it is. Everyone I

0:21:19.782 --> 0:21:21.702
<v Speaker 3>know is trying to cut down on their screen time.

0:21:21.861 --> 0:21:23.902
<v Speaker 3>No one wants to be left on read. When we're

0:21:23.942 --> 0:21:26.141
<v Speaker 3>left on red, it feels very close to being thrown

0:21:26.182 --> 0:21:29.262
<v Speaker 3>out of the nest. When we fail to text others back,

0:21:29.302 --> 0:21:32.221
<v Speaker 3>we see it as morally neutral behavior, but when others

0:21:32.262 --> 0:21:35.542
<v Speaker 3>do it to us, it creates sincere panic. And that

0:21:35.702 --> 0:21:38.381
<v Speaker 3>is so true. How many times have you sent a

0:21:38.422 --> 0:21:41.501
<v Speaker 3>text to somebody and they haven't responded. And then they

0:21:41.542 --> 0:21:44.542
<v Speaker 3>haven't responded. Your mind goes to, she's mad with me?

0:21:44.742 --> 0:21:47.581
<v Speaker 2>What have I done? Why haven't they responded? Was I rude?

0:21:47.661 --> 0:21:49.262
<v Speaker 2>And you go back and you read the text. Was

0:21:49.262 --> 0:21:51.782
<v Speaker 2>I rude? Did I phrase that wrongly? Should I? Blah

0:21:51.821 --> 0:21:52.222
<v Speaker 2>blah blah.

0:21:52.262 --> 0:21:54.421
<v Speaker 3>But when you don't reply to a text, you're like,

0:21:54.982 --> 0:21:56.421
<v Speaker 3>that's fine, I don't need to reply to that.

0:21:56.502 --> 0:21:59.741
<v Speaker 1>And then when someone texts you and says is everything okay?

0:22:00.022 --> 0:22:02.782
<v Speaker 1>Or are you mad with me? It feels like, well,

0:22:02.821 --> 0:22:03.421
<v Speaker 1>it's another bit.

0:22:03.502 --> 0:22:05.941
<v Speaker 3>It's interesting because it brings up the question of which

0:22:06.022 --> 0:22:08.581
<v Speaker 3>texts require a response and which ones don't.

0:22:08.942 --> 0:22:11.542
<v Speaker 4>The point there, o'donna who makes is that we have

0:22:11.702 --> 0:22:14.941
<v Speaker 4>now seen constant connection as a proxy for intimacy. So

0:22:14.982 --> 0:22:16.942
<v Speaker 4>if it's not a constant boom boom boom boom boom

0:22:16.982 --> 0:22:19.141
<v Speaker 4>bom boom, then we're not as close as we were.

0:22:19.381 --> 0:22:21.941
<v Speaker 4>And sometimes with friendships they go through a really intense

0:22:21.982 --> 0:22:23.622
<v Speaker 4>period and then you go, we haven't texted. I think

0:22:23.661 --> 0:22:26.821
<v Speaker 4>this all the time. I think about someone and I go,

0:22:27.262 --> 0:22:30.582
<v Speaker 4>I should text them, And it's like we can't have

0:22:30.621 --> 0:22:33.902
<v Speaker 4>that feeling without doing it. Whereas it used to be

0:22:33.982 --> 0:22:35.661
<v Speaker 4>that it was a phone caller. It was a letter

0:22:36.141 --> 0:22:36.862
<v Speaker 4>which by.

0:22:36.821 --> 0:22:39.022
<v Speaker 1>Are you'd organized to get together in Yes.

0:22:38.742 --> 0:22:42.382
<v Speaker 4>But by that nature it wasn't always accessible and always possible.

0:22:42.422 --> 0:22:44.861
<v Speaker 4>So she has this point about how just like in

0:22:44.901 --> 0:22:50.061
<v Speaker 4>the nineteen fifties, when technology meant that vacuuming was easier,

0:22:50.262 --> 0:22:52.542
<v Speaker 4>like you could finally vacuum rather than sweep, and you

0:22:52.581 --> 0:22:54.622
<v Speaker 4>had a dishwasher, and you had all of these new

0:22:54.621 --> 0:22:56.461
<v Speaker 4>things to make cleaning easier, and they were going to

0:22:56.502 --> 0:23:00.501
<v Speaker 4>afford women more time. What happened was that our standards

0:23:00.502 --> 0:23:03.542
<v Speaker 4>for cleaning just kept rising, and the same has happened

0:23:03.542 --> 0:23:07.621
<v Speaker 4>with our standards for socializing. And it's interesting how disproportionately

0:23:07.661 --> 0:23:10.942
<v Speaker 4>this has impacted women, because I don't know men who

0:23:10.942 --> 0:23:15.022
<v Speaker 4>are having this same the mental load of all of this.

0:23:15.101 --> 0:23:16.782
<v Speaker 4>We talked about this in our live show, that the

0:23:16.821 --> 0:23:19.861
<v Speaker 4>mental load of the group chat is something that women

0:23:19.942 --> 0:23:22.502
<v Speaker 4>are wearing in a way that men aren't. They don't

0:23:22.542 --> 0:23:25.742
<v Speaker 4>have the same levels of guilt and responsibility to their friends,

0:23:25.742 --> 0:23:28.181
<v Speaker 4>which I actually think there's something kind of admirable about that.

0:23:28.262 --> 0:23:31.702
<v Speaker 3>It also must change the texture of our relationships.

0:23:31.821 --> 0:23:32.742
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if you remember.

0:23:32.782 --> 0:23:35.342
<v Speaker 3>There was a skit in a Chris Rock special once

0:23:35.381 --> 0:23:38.462
<v Speaker 3>where he talked about how marriage is before constant texting

0:23:38.542 --> 0:23:41.022
<v Speaker 3>and marriage is after a different thing and they should

0:23:41.061 --> 0:23:44.141
<v Speaker 3>be classified in a different time frame because you used

0:23:44.182 --> 0:23:46.982
<v Speaker 3>to leave the house in the morning, spend all day

0:23:47.061 --> 0:23:49.381
<v Speaker 3>doing whatever you were doing, come back together in the

0:23:49.422 --> 0:23:51.942
<v Speaker 3>evening and you hadn't had any contact all day. And

0:23:51.982 --> 0:23:53.542
<v Speaker 3>you know, lots of people still like that, I guess,

0:23:53.621 --> 0:23:56.022
<v Speaker 3>but most of us are very much like just checking

0:23:56.061 --> 0:23:58.262
<v Speaker 3>in and could you do and house things and did

0:23:58.302 --> 0:24:03.862
<v Speaker 3>you believe this happened? And that heightened number of interactions

0:24:03.861 --> 0:24:07.101
<v Speaker 3>means there's less to discuss in real time. But also

0:24:07.222 --> 0:24:10.101
<v Speaker 3>does it kind of make your relationship more or intense

0:24:10.702 --> 0:24:10.942
<v Speaker 3>or do.

0:24:10.861 --> 0:24:14.341
<v Speaker 4>You burn through relationships faster because you've reached the point

0:24:14.381 --> 0:24:17.742
<v Speaker 4>of peak everything, like you've just known each other really,

0:24:17.742 --> 0:24:20.262
<v Speaker 4>really well. And I think that group chats are a

0:24:20.302 --> 0:24:24.101
<v Speaker 4>specific type of connection because they can just go all

0:24:24.141 --> 0:24:26.982
<v Speaker 4>the time, like constantly, and there might be twenty people

0:24:26.982 --> 0:24:29.821
<v Speaker 4>in them. But I don't necessarily think that people who

0:24:29.821 --> 0:24:31.901
<v Speaker 4>are bad at texting. I never get the sense that

0:24:31.982 --> 0:24:34.141
<v Speaker 4>I'm mad at them all. I think they don't like me.

0:24:34.262 --> 0:24:36.181
<v Speaker 4>I think they have a different relationship with their phone.

0:24:36.222 --> 0:24:39.782
<v Speaker 4>And I'm quite aware that my relationship with my phone

0:24:40.101 --> 0:24:41.981
<v Speaker 4>is a problem i'd like to fix.

0:24:42.262 --> 0:24:45.981
<v Speaker 1>I find group chats in a way easier. And I

0:24:46.022 --> 0:24:47.941
<v Speaker 1>know that you know some people are in group chats,

0:24:47.942 --> 0:24:50.661
<v Speaker 1>some people aren't. But what I've made peace with now

0:24:51.422 --> 0:24:54.502
<v Speaker 1>is sometimes a group chat can be going on and

0:24:54.581 --> 0:24:57.181
<v Speaker 1>you're not in it, and you're not involved, and it's okay.

0:24:57.702 --> 0:24:59.861
<v Speaker 1>It's almost like social media, like when you pick up

0:24:59.861 --> 0:25:01.462
<v Speaker 1>your phone to look at social media, you don't go

0:25:01.542 --> 0:25:03.661
<v Speaker 1>back to the beginning of You just jump in the

0:25:03.702 --> 0:25:06.022
<v Speaker 1>stream wherever you are, write it for a little while

0:25:06.022 --> 0:25:06.462
<v Speaker 1>and then post.

0:25:06.581 --> 0:25:06.701
<v Speaker 5>Now.

0:25:06.861 --> 0:25:09.702
<v Speaker 4>It's also that, and I think it was O'donahu who

0:25:09.742 --> 0:25:12.022
<v Speaker 4>made this point. I mean, our work communications are in

0:25:12.061 --> 0:25:14.581
<v Speaker 4>the same place that our social communications are, and every

0:25:14.581 --> 0:25:20.061
<v Speaker 4>notification from a friend's message to an urgent work email

0:25:20.141 --> 0:25:22.462
<v Speaker 4>is presented the same on a phone. So you get

0:25:22.462 --> 0:25:24.702
<v Speaker 4>this spike of like must open now. And what I've

0:25:24.742 --> 0:25:27.181
<v Speaker 4>tried to do is go do not open the message

0:25:27.222 --> 0:25:29.141
<v Speaker 4>until you can answer it. So if that means that

0:25:29.222 --> 0:25:31.302
<v Speaker 4>at nine pm you go, all right, I'm going to

0:25:31.462 --> 0:25:33.221
<v Speaker 4>because then I enjoy it, like I sit down and

0:25:33.222 --> 0:25:36.102
<v Speaker 4>I go, here's my time to go through this. And

0:25:36.182 --> 0:25:40.022
<v Speaker 4>she speaks to about the experience and this is something

0:25:40.061 --> 0:25:42.581
<v Speaker 4>new where you're waiting on a message from someone and

0:25:42.581 --> 0:25:44.901
<v Speaker 4>then they post on social media and you're like, I

0:25:45.061 --> 0:25:46.861
<v Speaker 4>know you have that phone in your hand, and I

0:25:46.982 --> 0:25:49.382
<v Speaker 4>just want to know if we're hanging out on Wednesday.

0:25:48.982 --> 0:25:52.302
<v Speaker 3>We're being spied on the way in that context, So

0:25:52.661 --> 0:25:54.901
<v Speaker 3>on that and this idea that we all feel a

0:25:54.942 --> 0:25:57.981
<v Speaker 3>little abandoned if we're left on red, what do you

0:25:58.061 --> 0:26:00.421
<v Speaker 3>think that messages you do have to respond to? And

0:26:00.462 --> 0:26:03.702
<v Speaker 3>how long is it okay to leave between Because this

0:26:03.821 --> 0:26:06.502
<v Speaker 3>original story, she was saying, a lot of people start

0:26:06.542 --> 0:26:09.381
<v Speaker 3>their text and I certainly do this sometimes with so

0:26:09.821 --> 0:26:11.901
<v Speaker 3>I just saw this, and she says that she has

0:26:11.942 --> 0:26:14.022
<v Speaker 3>a friend who she considers to have a very relaxed,

0:26:14.061 --> 0:26:17.502
<v Speaker 3>cool relationship with texting who never apologizes. It's just like

0:26:17.621 --> 0:26:19.861
<v Speaker 3>I got to it when I got to it. How

0:26:19.901 --> 0:26:22.302
<v Speaker 3>do you feel if people don't reply to your messages?

0:26:22.581 --> 0:26:23.742
<v Speaker 3>How long do you think it's okay?

0:26:23.942 --> 0:26:26.181
<v Speaker 4>I assume that they've done the thing where they've opened it,

0:26:26.222 --> 0:26:28.302
<v Speaker 4>they've gone, I'll get back to that. They've then had

0:26:28.462 --> 0:26:31.502
<v Speaker 4>seven hundred and eighty other thoughts within two hours and

0:26:31.542 --> 0:26:33.702
<v Speaker 4>they've totally forgotten and that's fine. And if it's urgent.

0:26:33.742 --> 0:26:36.701
<v Speaker 4>I'll follow up, but I'm never ever getting my feelings

0:26:36.782 --> 0:26:37.901
<v Speaker 4>hurt that I haven't got a response.

0:26:37.942 --> 0:26:38.621
<v Speaker 2>What about Eamia.

0:26:38.742 --> 0:26:42.542
<v Speaker 1>I've got so many going at once that I don't notice.

0:26:42.702 --> 0:26:44.542
<v Speaker 4>To be honest, sometimes I feel I've been many to

0:26:44.581 --> 0:26:46.821
<v Speaker 4>bring this up with your Maia. Sometimes you throw a

0:26:46.901 --> 0:26:49.101
<v Speaker 4>link in our chat and I go, I'll read that,

0:26:49.502 --> 0:26:50.821
<v Speaker 4>and then I don't get back to you, and I

0:26:50.861 --> 0:26:53.662
<v Speaker 4>feel like you're sitting there going they didn't read my link.

0:26:53.742 --> 0:26:56.662
<v Speaker 3>It's true because Mia throws great links like the quality

0:26:56.702 --> 0:26:59.782
<v Speaker 3>is high. Yeah, I'm but it means probably at the

0:26:59.782 --> 0:27:01.662
<v Speaker 3>time she said, I don't have ten minutes to sit

0:27:01.702 --> 0:27:03.101
<v Speaker 3>and read that, so I'll be like, I'll get to

0:27:03.182 --> 0:27:05.221
<v Speaker 3>that later, by which time Maya will have forgotten about it.

0:27:05.302 --> 0:27:07.661
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. I fear that I've hurt your feeling.

0:27:07.742 --> 0:27:10.701
<v Speaker 1>So to be clear, because you're right, my love language

0:27:10.782 --> 0:27:12.702
<v Speaker 1>is sending links of things that I think people will

0:27:12.702 --> 0:27:17.702
<v Speaker 1>find interesting. I don't expect a response even necessarily. Ever,

0:27:18.101 --> 0:27:20.982
<v Speaker 1>it's more here's a little thing. I have to send

0:27:20.982 --> 0:27:22.621
<v Speaker 1>it now because I'm reading it now and I won't

0:27:22.982 --> 0:27:24.462
<v Speaker 1>find it again. But here's a little thing I thought

0:27:24.502 --> 0:27:28.262
<v Speaker 1>you might enjoy. Not let's discuss this together. Please read it.

0:27:28.302 --> 0:27:31.502
<v Speaker 1>Unless it's like, oh my god, yeah, it's just happen immediately.

0:27:32.101 --> 0:27:34.861
<v Speaker 1>Usually it's just I think you'll be interested in this.

0:27:34.942 --> 0:27:38.221
<v Speaker 1>But there's no burden of response a question, you know,

0:27:38.262 --> 0:27:43.381
<v Speaker 1>when messaging what's happened? Everyone introduced like the reactions. At first,

0:27:43.462 --> 0:27:45.101
<v Speaker 1>I thought that was going to make things better because

0:27:45.101 --> 0:27:46.941
<v Speaker 1>you could just do a little thumbs up to what

0:27:46.982 --> 0:27:50.742
<v Speaker 1>someone said. But now it's almost like nothing ever ends

0:27:50.982 --> 0:27:53.101
<v Speaker 1>because you do a thumbs up, and then someone does

0:27:53.141 --> 0:27:55.661
<v Speaker 1>a thumbs up to your thumbs up, and then I know.

0:27:56.302 --> 0:27:58.702
<v Speaker 3>And also you know, sometimes I've got a friend who

0:27:58.742 --> 0:28:01.061
<v Speaker 3>I'll go so I'll meet you at seven and she'll

0:28:01.101 --> 0:28:02.502
<v Speaker 3>love heart it, And I'm.

0:28:02.341 --> 0:28:05.141
<v Speaker 2>Like, was that a yes? Or enough? Are we on

0:28:05.422 --> 0:28:05.981
<v Speaker 2>at seven?

0:28:06.182 --> 0:28:08.821
<v Speaker 4>I don't know, be clear. I just love how it

0:28:08.901 --> 0:28:12.141
<v Speaker 4>was through it. Do not call me, stage text me,

0:28:12.462 --> 0:28:14.061
<v Speaker 4>and now we've gone to it, do not text me.

0:28:14.101 --> 0:28:15.542
<v Speaker 4>I don't want to reply. I also don't want to

0:28:15.581 --> 0:28:17.782
<v Speaker 4>be emailed. I definitely don't want you at my door.

0:28:18.182 --> 0:28:21.022
<v Speaker 4>I think that what we're saying is like go away.

0:28:21.101 --> 0:28:23.181
<v Speaker 4>And this is what o'donna who said, is that I

0:28:23.222 --> 0:28:25.901
<v Speaker 4>post on social to prove to myself that I exist question.

0:28:26.022 --> 0:28:26.222
<v Speaker 6>Mind.

0:28:26.302 --> 0:28:27.662
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we're also lonely, and.

0:28:27.702 --> 0:28:29.502
<v Speaker 4>Yet there is a different thing. Often I'll see a

0:28:29.661 --> 0:28:31.581
<v Speaker 4>text come through and I go, I don't have the

0:28:31.621 --> 0:28:33.941
<v Speaker 4>social energy to construct a reply yet, and then I

0:28:33.982 --> 0:28:36.142
<v Speaker 4>have to wait for that to kind of come back.

0:28:36.182 --> 0:28:38.302
<v Speaker 4>It takes a different part of you to kind of

0:28:38.582 --> 0:28:39.222
<v Speaker 4>give it justice.

0:28:39.342 --> 0:28:41.822
<v Speaker 3>I think it's not don't call me, don't text me,

0:28:41.902 --> 0:28:45.262
<v Speaker 3>don't anything me. It's I only want to communicate on

0:28:45.302 --> 0:28:48.062
<v Speaker 3>my terms when I want to communicate. Anything else is

0:28:48.062 --> 0:28:50.582
<v Speaker 3>an inconvenience, And it's to do with what we've discussed

0:28:50.582 --> 0:28:52.822
<v Speaker 3>lots of times about. However, thing's on demand now, so

0:28:52.822 --> 0:28:55.302
<v Speaker 3>we're like, I might have ten minutes to have a

0:28:55.302 --> 0:28:58.302
<v Speaker 3>proper catch up with you, but you might not, And

0:28:58.342 --> 0:29:00.622
<v Speaker 3>so now with voice notes, and then it's who's got

0:29:00.622 --> 0:29:03.782
<v Speaker 3>time for that one? And baby, sometimes we should just

0:29:03.782 --> 0:29:04.742
<v Speaker 3>bring back the phone call.

0:29:05.542 --> 0:29:08.542
<v Speaker 4>Your favorite podcast is now a video but a vodcast

0:29:08.582 --> 0:29:11.822
<v Speaker 4>the future or crap Telly. That's a headline from the

0:29:11.822 --> 0:29:16.221
<v Speaker 4>Guardian last month, and it feels uncomfortably pointed. So if

0:29:16.222 --> 0:29:18.981
<v Speaker 4>you're big into podcasting, you might have noticed that a

0:29:19.022 --> 0:29:22.982
<v Speaker 4>lot of the blockbuster podcasts now if you're listening on Spotify,

0:29:23.262 --> 0:29:25.622
<v Speaker 4>like a video of that will come up at the

0:29:25.661 --> 0:29:28.302
<v Speaker 4>same time they're publishing full videos along with the audio.

0:29:28.661 --> 0:29:31.981
<v Speaker 4>And in February of this year, YouTube announced that it

0:29:32.062 --> 0:29:36.342
<v Speaker 4>had one billion users watching podcast content, meaning that it

0:29:36.382 --> 0:29:39.902
<v Speaker 4>has become the market leader in podcasting. It's bigger and

0:29:39.902 --> 0:29:42.622
<v Speaker 4>Apple bigger than Spotify. People are watching the podcasts.

0:29:42.342 --> 0:29:45.902
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, slightly dubious numbers in terms of I think the

0:29:45.942 --> 0:29:49.902
<v Speaker 1>way they measure a view of a podcast is like one.

0:29:49.742 --> 0:29:52.461
<v Speaker 4>Second interesting, but still.

0:29:52.262 --> 0:29:53.902
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you only just have to flick through your

0:29:53.902 --> 0:29:56.742
<v Speaker 1>social media, and all of my social media now is

0:29:56.782 --> 0:29:58.782
<v Speaker 1>pretty much just podcasts reels of podcasts.

0:29:58.782 --> 0:30:00.822
<v Speaker 4>A lot of men I know are watching a Joe

0:30:00.942 --> 0:30:03.902
<v Speaker 4>Rogan like that. Stuff is really big. Whether we like

0:30:03.942 --> 0:30:06.421
<v Speaker 4>it or not, vodcasts are happening. They'll be coming to

0:30:06.422 --> 0:30:09.782
<v Speaker 4>streaming services, and this shift is in large part than

0:30:09.822 --> 0:30:14.022
<v Speaker 4>by gen z, who use YouTuber's background television in a

0:30:14.062 --> 0:30:18.181
<v Speaker 4>way that isn't native to me. Some industry insiders reckon

0:30:18.422 --> 0:30:21.742
<v Speaker 4>vodcasts are just crap telly, and there's resistance by many

0:30:21.902 --> 0:30:24.902
<v Speaker 4>who don't want to consume another form of entertainment that

0:30:25.022 --> 0:30:27.702
<v Speaker 4>has them gaping at a screen like they've loved how

0:30:27.742 --> 0:30:30.342
<v Speaker 4>refreshing podcasts are. Because It frees them from a screen

0:30:30.542 --> 0:30:32.142
<v Speaker 4>and they can go about their lives while listening.

0:30:32.182 --> 0:30:35.022
<v Speaker 3>So most women are doing other things right now while

0:30:35.022 --> 0:30:37.342
<v Speaker 3>they're listening to this. I can see you. You are

0:30:37.462 --> 0:30:39.702
<v Speaker 3>washing up, you are going for a walk, you are

0:30:40.342 --> 0:30:43.062
<v Speaker 3>pretending to a boring story, or child is telling you.

0:30:43.182 --> 0:30:46.661
<v Speaker 4>Yeah. Others, however, like the idea of seeing hosts that

0:30:46.702 --> 0:30:49.142
<v Speaker 4>they're familiar with and having them on in their house.

0:30:49.582 --> 0:30:52.062
<v Speaker 4>We're getting a lot of questions about our pivot because

0:30:52.062 --> 0:30:56.622
<v Speaker 4>we're in our new podcast era. We're in our vodcast era. Maya,

0:30:56.862 --> 0:30:59.461
<v Speaker 4>are we trying to be shitty television? Is that the strat?

0:30:59.582 --> 0:31:00.461
<v Speaker 4>Is that the strategy?

0:31:00.582 --> 0:31:03.382
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, strat, that's definitely the strategy you mentioned, jen Z.

0:31:03.502 --> 0:31:05.462
<v Speaker 1>But the thing that's really driving it all, of course

0:31:05.542 --> 0:31:09.782
<v Speaker 1>is capitalism. Jesse, I can't believe goodness and the tech

0:31:09.822 --> 0:31:14.302
<v Speaker 1>platforms because the thing that's so great about podcasts is

0:31:14.342 --> 0:31:18.022
<v Speaker 1>that they're not algorithmic. At the moment, your podcast feed

0:31:18.102 --> 0:31:20.261
<v Speaker 1>wherever you listen to it, say, Spotify and Apple are

0:31:20.262 --> 0:31:23.181
<v Speaker 1>probably the two biggest platforms. Let's leave YouTube out of it.

0:31:23.982 --> 0:31:26.941
<v Speaker 1>You will see in chronological order the shows that you

0:31:27.022 --> 0:31:28.742
<v Speaker 1>follow and what they release.

0:31:28.862 --> 0:31:30.142
<v Speaker 4>You can go and have a look at charts if

0:31:30.182 --> 0:31:31.421
<v Speaker 4>you want to try to see what's trending.

0:31:31.542 --> 0:31:35.181
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and that's kept podcasts really beautiful and pure in

0:31:35.222 --> 0:31:37.062
<v Speaker 1>a way because it means that it's not just the

0:31:37.102 --> 0:31:40.302
<v Speaker 1>most extreme content that rises to the surface like it

0:31:40.382 --> 0:31:44.021
<v Speaker 1>does whenever an algorithm's introduced. But the problem with that

0:31:44.222 --> 0:31:47.502
<v Speaker 1>is that podcasts have always been hard to share and

0:31:47.582 --> 0:31:50.622
<v Speaker 1>hard for people to discover new ones because an algorithm

0:31:50.661 --> 0:31:52.422
<v Speaker 1>is not putting things into your feed that you think

0:31:52.462 --> 0:31:55.542
<v Speaker 1>you might be interested in. Now, we're not unhappy about that,

0:31:55.742 --> 0:31:58.302
<v Speaker 1>except for the part where it can be hard to

0:31:58.382 --> 0:32:01.622
<v Speaker 1>grow and get a new audience. And so that's when

0:32:01.982 --> 0:32:04.062
<v Speaker 1>you know, everything needs to be on social media. That's

0:32:04.102 --> 0:32:06.542
<v Speaker 1>the main form of marketing and pr these days, and

0:32:06.582 --> 0:32:09.382
<v Speaker 1>you need visuals to put on things like Instagram. And

0:32:10.222 --> 0:32:13.781
<v Speaker 1>so that's when everybody had to record their podcasts. And

0:32:13.822 --> 0:32:16.742
<v Speaker 1>then YouTube wanted a piece of the action, and instead

0:32:16.742 --> 0:32:19.062
<v Speaker 1>of just little snippets, people were like, well, we're already

0:32:19.062 --> 0:32:21.782
<v Speaker 1>brushing our hair and setting up cameras and editing it,

0:32:21.822 --> 0:32:24.142
<v Speaker 1>and that's already a pain in the neck an extra

0:32:24.182 --> 0:32:26.702
<v Speaker 1>at cost. We may as well do the whole thing

0:32:26.862 --> 0:32:29.822
<v Speaker 1>and chuck it on yet another platform. So that's what

0:32:29.862 --> 0:32:34.022
<v Speaker 1>we're all doing, and it's interesting because we have mixed

0:32:34.022 --> 0:32:36.902
<v Speaker 1>feelings about it. You know, if we had our way

0:32:37.302 --> 0:32:40.302
<v Speaker 1>purely from a podcasting point of view, we would prefer

0:32:40.342 --> 0:32:43.461
<v Speaker 1>to just have no cameras be in a studio because

0:32:43.502 --> 0:32:46.222
<v Speaker 1>it's more intimate. You're less conscious of how you look.

0:32:46.382 --> 0:32:48.701
<v Speaker 3>One of the things we used to particularly like about

0:32:48.822 --> 0:32:51.902
<v Speaker 3>pure audio is that it just is a fact that

0:32:51.982 --> 0:32:54.742
<v Speaker 3>as soon as you can see someone talking, you're not

0:32:54.862 --> 0:32:57.582
<v Speaker 3>just listening to them talking. You are reading a whole

0:32:57.582 --> 0:33:01.102
<v Speaker 3>lot of cues from everything you can see from clearly

0:33:01.142 --> 0:33:03.941
<v Speaker 3>what they look like, in terms of have they brushed

0:33:03.942 --> 0:33:05.302
<v Speaker 3>their hair, have they done their makeup?

0:33:05.342 --> 0:33:07.262
<v Speaker 2>What are they wearing? All the little clues, Oh, whats

0:33:07.302 --> 0:33:09.742
<v Speaker 2>that necklace? Me has got on? Oh, someone says a

0:33:09.782 --> 0:33:12.661
<v Speaker 2>bit tired today. Any TV presenter will.

0:33:12.542 --> 0:33:15.422
<v Speaker 3>Tell you that they get more feedback about what they're

0:33:15.422 --> 0:33:18.382
<v Speaker 3>wearing and how they've done their lipstick female TV presenters

0:33:18.862 --> 0:33:21.782
<v Speaker 3>than anything they ever say or report. And so there's

0:33:21.822 --> 0:33:25.582
<v Speaker 3>something wonderfully freeing about the idea that no people are

0:33:25.622 --> 0:33:28.782
<v Speaker 3>just engaging with your voice and your thoughts and your ideas.

0:33:29.302 --> 0:33:30.582
<v Speaker 2>Those days are gone.

0:33:31.462 --> 0:33:34.062
<v Speaker 3>We are now out of hiding, and I think it's

0:33:34.102 --> 0:33:37.102
<v Speaker 3>so fine like, I think it's absolutely fine, but it's

0:33:37.182 --> 0:33:39.462
<v Speaker 3>definitely a different relationship.

0:33:39.982 --> 0:33:43.622
<v Speaker 4>I reckon for women in particular, the pivot will be

0:33:44.262 --> 0:33:46.262
<v Speaker 4>to having it on in the background. I've had a

0:33:46.302 --> 0:33:49.582
<v Speaker 4>lot of women I know talk about having a podcast

0:33:49.661 --> 0:33:52.302
<v Speaker 4>up on YouTube on their television while they go and

0:33:52.342 --> 0:33:54.262
<v Speaker 4>do something else, and they're kind of listening, and they

0:33:54.422 --> 0:33:58.862
<v Speaker 4>like the familiarity of a host who's voice. They recognize

0:33:58.982 --> 0:34:00.982
<v Speaker 4>the idea that you would sit down as some sort

0:34:00.982 --> 0:34:03.502
<v Speaker 4>of appointment viewing when that show comes out. I don't

0:34:03.542 --> 0:34:07.582
<v Speaker 4>think is probably realistic, but I think it's coming really

0:34:07.902 --> 0:34:10.142
<v Speaker 4>because we saw last week and talked about it on

0:34:10.182 --> 0:34:13.502
<v Speaker 4>the show, the axing of Q and A and the Project,

0:34:13.542 --> 0:34:15.422
<v Speaker 4>and the irony is that this is the bringback of

0:34:15.462 --> 0:34:18.381
<v Speaker 4>the panel show, like we're essentially a panel show and

0:34:18.661 --> 0:34:21.182
<v Speaker 4>haven't we seen that die? And there was a really

0:34:21.221 --> 0:34:25.062
<v Speaker 4>interesting article by Walid Ali in The Age at the

0:34:25.102 --> 0:34:28.341
<v Speaker 4>end of last week about how really this pivot has

0:34:28.342 --> 0:34:30.861
<v Speaker 4>a lot more to do with revenue than format, and

0:34:30.902 --> 0:34:34.701
<v Speaker 4>he was saying that on social media, on your TikTok, Instagram,

0:34:34.741 --> 0:34:38.942
<v Speaker 4>YouTube ads are so targeted. They've harvested so much data

0:34:38.982 --> 0:34:41.902
<v Speaker 4>about me that the ads, if I'm going to spend

0:34:41.942 --> 0:34:46.221
<v Speaker 4>money on an ad for nappies, then I want to

0:34:46.261 --> 0:34:48.622
<v Speaker 4>make sure I'm getting me who has kids in nappies.

0:34:48.661 --> 0:34:52.462
<v Speaker 4>Why would I put that on primetime television where most

0:34:52.502 --> 0:34:55.861
<v Speaker 4>of the people watching don't need nappies. And so that's

0:34:55.902 --> 0:34:59.221
<v Speaker 4>why there's more money in the kind of very targeted

0:34:59.622 --> 0:35:02.302
<v Speaker 4>social media world rather than social TV.

0:35:02.382 --> 0:35:07.781
<v Speaker 1>Commercial TV is broadcasting, and podcasts and other forms of

0:35:07.822 --> 0:35:10.622
<v Speaker 1>digital media tend to be narrow cast. So for example,

0:35:10.622 --> 0:35:15.142
<v Speaker 1>we're a podcast for women, that wouldn't be our primetime show,

0:35:15.221 --> 0:35:18.142
<v Speaker 1>and yet we are a daily show and we have

0:35:18.181 --> 0:35:21.422
<v Speaker 1>a really big audience. The other thing to note is

0:35:21.462 --> 0:35:24.302
<v Speaker 1>that it's all about choice. So we are now on YouTube.

0:35:24.382 --> 0:35:27.102
<v Speaker 1>You can watch us on YouTube, but nothing's going to change.

0:35:27.142 --> 0:35:29.582
<v Speaker 1>The podcast that you hear is going to be the same.

0:35:30.221 --> 0:35:33.622
<v Speaker 1>We don't make different creative decisions about what's in the

0:35:33.701 --> 0:35:37.022
<v Speaker 1>show because we're now had to build a studio and

0:35:37.022 --> 0:35:40.422
<v Speaker 1>do all of these things. For creators, it's more expensive

0:35:40.422 --> 0:35:43.102
<v Speaker 1>and it's harder, But for you, it's just about choice.

0:35:43.221 --> 0:35:44.982
<v Speaker 3>And so if you listen to us on Spotify, if

0:35:45.022 --> 0:35:47.301
<v Speaker 3>you listen to us on Apple, no difference at all.

0:35:47.422 --> 0:35:50.302
<v Speaker 3>You will see some podcast videos on Spotify and sometimes

0:35:50.342 --> 0:35:52.181
<v Speaker 3>I wonder, Oh, if I don't want to watch the

0:35:52.261 --> 0:35:55.261
<v Speaker 3>video because I'm always doing something else, I'm not watching them,

0:35:55.902 --> 0:35:58.421
<v Speaker 3>will it still use up my data? It won't if

0:35:58.462 --> 0:36:01.822
<v Speaker 3>you've set your settings to not download video. So nothing

0:36:01.942 --> 0:36:04.861
<v Speaker 3>changes unless you go and seek it out out loud.

0:36:04.902 --> 0:36:07.301
<v Speaker 1>As friends come into your life for a reason, a

0:36:07.422 --> 0:36:11.742
<v Speaker 1>season or a lifetime. So to podcast segments, don't worry.

0:36:11.862 --> 0:36:14.582
<v Speaker 1>The show's not going to be over, but we are

0:36:14.622 --> 0:36:17.261
<v Speaker 1>retiring a segment that we've done for a while that's

0:36:17.261 --> 0:36:18.742
<v Speaker 1>pretty popular, Best and Worst.

0:36:19.022 --> 0:36:21.062
<v Speaker 2>We are big the grounds.

0:36:21.102 --> 0:36:25.302
<v Speaker 4>I know people pissed, pissed, or maybe maybe she is going, yes,

0:36:25.542 --> 0:36:28.622
<v Speaker 4>you know what, shut the fuck up hearing about your life.

0:36:28.822 --> 0:36:31.062
<v Speaker 1>We wanted to take you into the tent and explain

0:36:31.181 --> 0:36:33.582
<v Speaker 1>to you why. And we tried once before to get

0:36:33.661 --> 0:36:35.502
<v Speaker 1>rid of Best and Worse, and there was a big outcry,

0:36:35.741 --> 0:36:38.102
<v Speaker 1>and so we brought it back. But we are actually

0:36:38.102 --> 0:36:40.222
<v Speaker 1>getting rid of it this time, or retiring it, putting

0:36:40.221 --> 0:36:43.181
<v Speaker 1>it on hiatus, and sending it out to pasta for

0:36:43.582 --> 0:36:47.821
<v Speaker 1>the following reasons. The first is probably that, as you

0:36:47.862 --> 0:36:51.102
<v Speaker 1>can understand, when you're talking about the worst thing that

0:36:51.181 --> 0:36:54.341
<v Speaker 1>happened to you in a week, it's often something that

0:36:54.582 --> 0:36:56.861
<v Speaker 1>might involve other people in your life. In fact, it

0:36:56.942 --> 0:37:01.261
<v Speaker 1>usually almost always does all things that are private. It

0:37:01.342 --> 0:37:03.901
<v Speaker 1>might be work related things, it might be health related things,

0:37:03.942 --> 0:37:06.461
<v Speaker 1>it might be relationship things, it might be things about

0:37:06.502 --> 0:37:10.382
<v Speaker 1>your kids or your parents. And for us, we have

0:37:10.502 --> 0:37:13.422
<v Speaker 1>to protect the people in our lives. But then to

0:37:13.542 --> 0:37:15.982
<v Speaker 1>say my worst of the week was that I got

0:37:16.022 --> 0:37:18.981
<v Speaker 1>a parking ticket, or that I, you know, tripped over

0:37:19.022 --> 0:37:21.781
<v Speaker 1>a coffee on my shirt, or my dogs had a fight,

0:37:21.982 --> 0:37:26.022
<v Speaker 1>and that starts to not feel true to who we are.

0:37:26.902 --> 0:37:29.381
<v Speaker 1>And then you know, it's not to say that we're

0:37:29.422 --> 0:37:32.221
<v Speaker 1>not going to be still talking about our lives on

0:37:32.302 --> 0:37:34.622
<v Speaker 1>the show. We will be, of course, but there's something

0:37:34.622 --> 0:37:37.742
<v Speaker 1>about having to choose the best thing and the worst

0:37:37.741 --> 0:37:40.901
<v Speaker 1>thing that makes it quite extreme. And I've always said also,

0:37:41.102 --> 0:37:43.702
<v Speaker 1>it's better to share from a scar, not a wound.

0:37:44.462 --> 0:37:47.542
<v Speaker 1>When it's something that's literally happening in the last few days,

0:37:48.261 --> 0:37:49.781
<v Speaker 1>you often don't even know what to say about it.

0:37:49.822 --> 0:37:51.142
<v Speaker 4>There's not a lot of wisdom to offer.

0:37:51.342 --> 0:37:53.502
<v Speaker 3>No, here's the tell of when we knew it had

0:37:53.502 --> 0:37:56.381
<v Speaker 3>to happen. Brent got a stick stuck in his had,

0:37:57.221 --> 0:37:59.701
<v Speaker 3>and my first response was, at least I've got a

0:37:59.741 --> 0:38:00.542
<v Speaker 3>worse this week.

0:38:02.542 --> 0:38:06.181
<v Speaker 4>We've all had those moments, and it was also a

0:38:06.181 --> 0:38:08.701
<v Speaker 4>low point where me or and I were jealous that

0:38:08.822 --> 0:38:12.661
<v Speaker 4>you had such and we were sitting around waiting for

0:38:12.661 --> 0:38:14.301
<v Speaker 4>a parking ticket or something so that we.

0:38:14.261 --> 0:38:16.102
<v Speaker 2>Had something to show great worst.

0:38:16.221 --> 0:38:19.341
<v Speaker 3>So sometimes it means that you're kind of curating and

0:38:19.382 --> 0:38:23.341
<v Speaker 3>relating to your life through a slightly strange So I'm

0:38:23.382 --> 0:38:25.142
<v Speaker 3>sure we're still going to talk about all kinds of stuff,

0:38:25.142 --> 0:38:27.062
<v Speaker 3>all kinds of nonsense. We're still going to keep Fridays

0:38:27.302 --> 0:38:30.301
<v Speaker 3>light and fun. Right, yep, exactly right, But no best

0:38:30.302 --> 0:38:34.222
<v Speaker 3>and worse for now after the break, we have recommendations.

0:38:34.302 --> 0:38:35.502
<v Speaker 2>We are still having recommendations.

0:38:35.622 --> 0:38:39.622
<v Speaker 3>We are still telling you on Fridays in this particular

0:38:39.661 --> 0:38:41.942
<v Speaker 3>week what to watch this weekend.

0:38:42.302 --> 0:38:46.302
<v Speaker 4>What unlimited out loud access. We drop episodes every Tuesday

0:38:46.302 --> 0:38:50.502
<v Speaker 4>and Thursday exclusively from Mum and Maya. Subscribers follow the

0:38:50.582 --> 0:38:52.421
<v Speaker 4>link in the show notes to get us in your

0:38:52.462 --> 0:38:55.301
<v Speaker 4>ears five days a week. And a huge thank you

0:38:55.422 --> 0:38:56.901
<v Speaker 4>to all our current subscribers.

0:39:03.622 --> 0:39:07.502
<v Speaker 5>Vibes ideas atmosphere, something casual, something fun.

0:39:08.022 --> 0:39:09.462
<v Speaker 4>This is my best recommendation.

0:39:10.542 --> 0:39:12.701
<v Speaker 3>I feel like our recos this week because we've all

0:39:12.781 --> 0:39:15.582
<v Speaker 3>chosen the TV show, and I think that they are

0:39:15.982 --> 0:39:20.142
<v Speaker 3>very true to our personalities the TV shows we've chosen

0:39:20.181 --> 0:39:22.181
<v Speaker 3>this week. When we were talking about in the meeting,

0:39:22.221 --> 0:39:24.861
<v Speaker 3>I was like, that is the most Jesse recommendation of

0:39:24.902 --> 0:39:25.382
<v Speaker 3>all time.

0:39:25.302 --> 0:39:27.702
<v Speaker 4>And it's going to be everyone's favorite. Don't even matter.

0:39:27.982 --> 0:39:31.382
<v Speaker 3>Go with your recommendation of the weeklyase out louders.

0:39:31.701 --> 0:39:34.102
<v Speaker 4>I have been waiting for this documentary. It was coming

0:39:34.102 --> 0:39:36.062
<v Speaker 4>on Netflix and it landed end of last week and

0:39:36.102 --> 0:39:40.261
<v Speaker 4>it is called titan the Ocean Gates Submersible Disare. Oh okay,

0:39:40.302 --> 0:39:43.622
<v Speaker 4>it is brilliant, so it's just come out. It is

0:39:43.622 --> 0:39:46.341
<v Speaker 4>about the twenty twenty three deep sea dive in the

0:39:46.382 --> 0:39:49.821
<v Speaker 4>submersible that ultimately imploded and killed lots of peace and

0:39:49.982 --> 0:39:53.861
<v Speaker 4>it killed five people. But the reason this documentary is

0:39:53.862 --> 0:39:56.902
<v Speaker 4>so brilliant is because it is about the hubris of

0:39:56.942 --> 0:39:59.622
<v Speaker 4>the CEO, the guy who created it. He had a

0:39:59.701 --> 0:40:02.582
<v Speaker 4>vision and saw himself as an Elon Musk, as a

0:40:02.622 --> 0:40:04.102
<v Speaker 4>Jeff Bezos type.

0:40:04.822 --> 0:40:05.622
<v Speaker 3>There was no way of.

0:40:05.582 --> 0:40:08.901
<v Speaker 6>Knowing where title was going to fail, but it was a.

0:40:08.862 --> 0:40:10.942
<v Speaker 3>Mathematical certainty that it would fail.

0:40:14.542 --> 0:40:18.502
<v Speaker 1>Stockton saw an opportunity to restart tourist physics to.

0:40:18.462 --> 0:40:22.701
<v Speaker 2>Titanic Stockton fully believed in what he was doing and

0:40:22.781 --> 0:40:26.421
<v Speaker 2>that it would work. He wanted to fame to fuel

0:40:26.462 --> 0:40:29.062
<v Speaker 2>his his ego theme, I have.

0:40:29.102 --> 0:40:30.422
<v Speaker 3>No desire to die.

0:40:33.102 --> 0:40:34.622
<v Speaker 5>I understand this.

0:40:34.582 --> 0:40:35.221
<v Speaker 1>Kind of risk.

0:40:35.701 --> 0:40:38.502
<v Speaker 6>I thought Stockton was a borderline psychopath. How do you

0:40:38.542 --> 0:40:41.341
<v Speaker 6>manage a person like that who owns the company.

0:40:42.022 --> 0:40:44.341
<v Speaker 4>It is the story of the descent of a lot

0:40:44.342 --> 0:40:48.942
<v Speaker 4>of his employees who were raising the alarm and saying,

0:40:48.982 --> 0:40:51.981
<v Speaker 4>I'm not comfortable with this. And what's fascinating is that

0:40:52.462 --> 0:40:55.181
<v Speaker 4>he got in it against the advice of everyone. He

0:40:55.261 --> 0:40:58.622
<v Speaker 4>would go down four thousand feet however deep. He wanted

0:40:58.661 --> 0:41:00.142
<v Speaker 4>to test it, and they were like, don't put a

0:41:00.221 --> 0:41:01.941
<v Speaker 4>human in it. Just send it down, but don't put

0:41:01.942 --> 0:41:03.502
<v Speaker 4>someone in it. And he would do it because of

0:41:03.582 --> 0:41:07.261
<v Speaker 4>his own ridiculous sort of ego, or also.

0:41:07.181 --> 0:41:10.382
<v Speaker 1>That he just could not understand risk very well.

0:41:10.422 --> 0:41:12.861
<v Speaker 4>And it did seem that way right And I won't

0:41:12.862 --> 0:41:14.062
<v Speaker 4>give away too much.

0:41:13.942 --> 0:41:15.261
<v Speaker 1>But we know how it ended well.

0:41:15.302 --> 0:41:17.821
<v Speaker 4>One of the most fascinating details, though, is that this

0:41:17.902 --> 0:41:20.661
<v Speaker 4>submersible was being made with carbon fiber, which had never

0:41:20.701 --> 0:41:23.301
<v Speaker 4>been done before. And if you can make a submersible

0:41:23.302 --> 0:41:27.341
<v Speaker 4>with a material that is cheaper and lighter, big deal. Right,

0:41:28.062 --> 0:41:30.062
<v Speaker 4>but what was happening and you can hear it the

0:41:30.142 --> 0:41:32.542
<v Speaker 4>amount of footage that they have. They always had go pros,

0:41:32.582 --> 0:41:33.741
<v Speaker 4>they had a videographer with them.

0:41:34.142 --> 0:41:35.781
<v Speaker 2>And there's all that in the documentary.

0:41:36.022 --> 0:41:38.301
<v Speaker 4>You can see down there. You can see what the

0:41:38.302 --> 0:41:39.262
<v Speaker 4>submersible looks.

0:41:39.102 --> 0:41:41.142
<v Speaker 2>Like, the six of that in terms of the people

0:41:41.181 --> 0:41:41.701
<v Speaker 2>who are down.

0:41:41.781 --> 0:41:44.142
<v Speaker 4>So they don't have any footage from that one. They

0:41:44.142 --> 0:41:46.741
<v Speaker 4>have footage from the other kind of dives that they did.

0:41:47.102 --> 0:41:50.662
<v Speaker 4>But what you would hear is popping, really loud popping,

0:41:51.062 --> 0:41:53.542
<v Speaker 4>and it was the sound of the carbon fiber breaking

0:41:54.221 --> 0:41:56.582
<v Speaker 4>and everyone was going, you know, we know how this

0:41:56.661 --> 0:41:59.301
<v Speaker 4>is going to end. And so when these former employees

0:41:59.342 --> 0:42:02.102
<v Speaker 4>saw the story, they knew exactly what had happened. The

0:42:02.261 --> 0:42:04.981
<v Speaker 4>narrative is great and it is just a really well done,

0:42:05.102 --> 0:42:08.262
<v Speaker 4>well produced documentary. You have to watch it. It's on Netflix.

0:42:08.502 --> 0:42:09.422
<v Speaker 2>Are you going to be watching that?

0:42:10.822 --> 0:42:12.301
<v Speaker 1>No, I'm not going.

0:42:12.261 --> 0:42:14.182
<v Speaker 4>To Maya, but different.

0:42:14.221 --> 0:42:15.262
<v Speaker 2>It makes for different.

0:42:15.622 --> 0:42:17.661
<v Speaker 4>It made me like you more. Can I tell you why?

0:42:17.822 --> 0:42:18.022
<v Speaker 1>Why?

0:42:18.462 --> 0:42:22.861
<v Speaker 2>Because I thought she wouldn't.

0:42:23.022 --> 0:42:27.462
<v Speaker 4>Mayor has had some mad ideas, but none of them

0:42:27.741 --> 0:42:30.942
<v Speaker 4>involve a submersible. No, don't get me wrong. If you

0:42:31.022 --> 0:42:33.381
<v Speaker 4>made submersibles, I think you probably would make us get

0:42:33.382 --> 0:42:36.422
<v Speaker 4>into one and go come on, guys.

0:42:35.382 --> 0:42:37.062
<v Speaker 2>Great content, do it for the ground.

0:42:37.102 --> 0:42:38.901
<v Speaker 4>And sometimes you make us do unusual things.

0:42:38.902 --> 0:42:41.741
<v Speaker 2>I've had to do some TikTok dancing out. Wasn't that

0:42:41.822 --> 0:42:42.742
<v Speaker 2>keen on exactly?

0:42:42.822 --> 0:42:44.861
<v Speaker 4>Stakes are a bit lower exactly? And I went, you

0:42:44.902 --> 0:42:47.302
<v Speaker 4>know what, I appreciate that. I turned to Luca Mayor,

0:42:47.342 --> 0:42:48.542
<v Speaker 4>isn't that bad after all?

0:42:49.382 --> 0:42:53.462
<v Speaker 1>So true? She may not understand risk, but she wouldn't

0:42:53.462 --> 0:42:54.701
<v Speaker 1>put us in a submersible.

0:42:55.862 --> 0:42:56.502
<v Speaker 2>Wasn't safe.

0:42:57.542 --> 0:43:00.781
<v Speaker 1>I've got something very, very different to watch after that

0:43:00.822 --> 0:43:02.661
<v Speaker 1>has sent you into a spiral of despair. No, I

0:43:02.701 --> 0:43:04.622
<v Speaker 1>actually thought about watching that because it does look really,

0:43:04.661 --> 0:43:07.622
<v Speaker 1>really interesting. I just am finding the news is so

0:43:07.661 --> 0:43:11.062
<v Speaker 1>bleak at the moment. I just want to have a laugh.

0:43:11.622 --> 0:43:14.382
<v Speaker 1>And I started watching a show that kept being served

0:43:14.382 --> 0:43:20.422
<v Speaker 1>to me on Prime Video. It's called over Compensating.

0:43:20.701 --> 0:43:22.062
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to College.

0:43:24.422 --> 0:43:27.022
<v Speaker 4>You can be whoever you want to be here can

0:43:27.902 --> 0:43:31.022
<v Speaker 4>I'm Benny Cormen, I'm a man Innx's cousin.

0:43:33.502 --> 0:43:42.662
<v Speaker 6>How the freshman ladies treat me? Either you're a dude?

0:43:42.661 --> 0:43:51.502
<v Speaker 1>Who or? And it's written, directed, and stars a guy

0:43:51.542 --> 0:43:55.582
<v Speaker 1>called Benito's Skinner who's like His name on Instagram is

0:43:55.582 --> 0:43:58.181
<v Speaker 1>Benny Drama. He's a thirty one year old actor and

0:43:58.221 --> 0:44:01.982
<v Speaker 1>comedian and he wrote this story that's pretty much exactly

0:44:02.022 --> 0:44:04.821
<v Speaker 1>based on him. But it's fiction about a guy who

0:44:04.862 --> 0:44:07.982
<v Speaker 1>goes to college and he's like a jock and captain

0:44:08.022 --> 0:44:11.981
<v Speaker 1>of the football team, and he's gay and he's closeted, and

0:44:12.622 --> 0:44:16.301
<v Speaker 1>he meets this girl who's got her own story and

0:44:17.022 --> 0:44:19.661
<v Speaker 1>they become really close friends after trying to hook up,

0:44:19.741 --> 0:44:23.062
<v Speaker 1>and she helps him try to navigate coming out. Makes

0:44:23.062 --> 0:44:24.741
<v Speaker 1>it sound really serious, but it's not at all. It's

0:44:24.741 --> 0:44:28.142
<v Speaker 1>actually hilarious. The whole thing is really really funny. I

0:44:28.261 --> 0:44:31.861
<v Speaker 1>just loved it. Short episodes, yeah, short episodes. There's a

0:44:31.862 --> 0:44:35.582
<v Speaker 1>great supporting cast. They're juggling horrible hookups, flavored vodka, fake id's.

0:44:35.622 --> 0:44:37.982
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of like almost you don't know what period

0:44:38.022 --> 0:44:40.502
<v Speaker 1>of time it's set in, Like it's set in now,

0:44:40.862 --> 0:44:45.862
<v Speaker 1>in an American college, but it's also like a time before.

0:44:46.022 --> 0:44:48.102
<v Speaker 1>Like sometimes you can think, oh, everyone can come out,

0:44:48.142 --> 0:44:50.982
<v Speaker 1>like ben queer is cool and it's no big deal anymore,

0:44:51.022 --> 0:44:52.422
<v Speaker 1>but it actually is a big deal for a lot

0:44:52.422 --> 0:44:55.062
<v Speaker 1>of people, and everybody has a different story about how

0:44:55.102 --> 0:44:57.821
<v Speaker 1>they come out. And this one's just great. It's just

0:44:57.862 --> 0:45:00.902
<v Speaker 1>such a fun show, overcompensating on Prime video.

0:45:01.902 --> 0:45:04.022
<v Speaker 3>So I'm not actually here right now. I am so

0:45:04.142 --> 0:45:06.582
<v Speaker 3>obsessed with this TV show that I have just discovered

0:45:06.622 --> 0:45:08.821
<v Speaker 3>that I am currently rolling around on a sandy beach

0:45:08.862 --> 0:45:11.662
<v Speaker 3>with a really handsome hunter who can slay a dragon

0:45:11.701 --> 0:45:12.542
<v Speaker 3>with his bare hands.

0:45:12.542 --> 0:45:15.301
<v Speaker 2>Not a dragon, a lion. A lion with his bare hand.

0:45:15.422 --> 0:45:17.302
<v Speaker 4>Oh my god, I've not heard of these.

0:45:17.181 --> 0:45:18.741
<v Speaker 2>Harry P. Ruster, is what I'm talking about.

0:45:18.822 --> 0:45:22.942
<v Speaker 3>She's nodding, because I have recently discovered my first show

0:45:23.102 --> 0:45:25.701
<v Speaker 3>in the Yellowstone Universe. Do you know what I'm talking about?

0:45:25.822 --> 0:45:29.062
<v Speaker 4>Yes, Yellowstone, everyone who watches says is brilliant, But I

0:45:29.102 --> 0:45:30.222
<v Speaker 4>didn't know there was a universe.

0:45:30.261 --> 0:45:31.781
<v Speaker 3>This guy, I don't know a lot about him is

0:45:31.781 --> 0:45:33.902
<v Speaker 3>called Taylor Sheridan. His politics might be a little dodgy,

0:45:33.902 --> 0:45:35.542
<v Speaker 3>so we won't go too deep into that, but he

0:45:35.622 --> 0:45:39.741
<v Speaker 3>has created Yellowstone, which is this massive smash for paramount

0:45:39.781 --> 0:45:41.661
<v Speaker 3>that stars Kevin Costner, and it's been It's one of

0:45:41.701 --> 0:45:45.261
<v Speaker 3>the most watched shows in the world, absolutely huge on

0:45:45.302 --> 0:45:49.381
<v Speaker 3>a ranch and so popular that it now has spin offs.

0:45:49.382 --> 0:45:52.022
<v Speaker 3>It has one I think it's called nineteen eighteen or something.

0:45:52.062 --> 0:45:54.022
<v Speaker 3>And the one that I have started watching at the

0:45:54.022 --> 0:45:57.342
<v Speaker 3>recommendation of a friend specifically because of this love story

0:45:57.342 --> 0:45:59.982
<v Speaker 3>at the heart of it, is called nineteen twenty three.

0:46:01.622 --> 0:46:05.102
<v Speaker 6>You've been missus Dutton, though he would seems we're neighbors,

0:46:05.221 --> 0:46:09.902
<v Speaker 6>have acquired the Stafford Ranch. Well, this is the yellow

0:46:09.902 --> 0:46:16.182
<v Speaker 6>Stone and you have no rights here, jegab you can't

0:46:16.221 --> 0:46:19.062
<v Speaker 6>start a range war. Range wars already started.

0:46:21.622 --> 0:46:22.582
<v Speaker 5>How much you'll ide you on?

0:46:23.822 --> 0:46:26.902
<v Speaker 6>I want the whole valley.

0:46:27.542 --> 0:46:30.542
<v Speaker 2>Either we take this fight to them or it's common.

0:46:30.502 --> 0:46:35.302
<v Speaker 6>Us men kill quick with a bullet or a nurse,

0:46:35.862 --> 0:46:39.701
<v Speaker 6>but they're fighters with me, and I kill much slower.

0:46:40.022 --> 0:46:42.381
<v Speaker 3>Is that when it's set, it's set in nineteen twenty three.

0:46:42.382 --> 0:46:44.942
<v Speaker 3>It'd be weird if it was it Jesse in between

0:46:44.982 --> 0:46:49.181
<v Speaker 3>the wars, right, And it's about this family in Montana,

0:46:49.422 --> 0:46:52.301
<v Speaker 3>the patriarch matriarchy, Harrison Ford and Helen Mirren. So we're

0:46:52.302 --> 0:46:54.582
<v Speaker 3>not fucking about here, We're not fucking about Wow, we

0:46:54.661 --> 0:46:58.102
<v Speaker 3>are top tiering it, right. Harrison Ford and Helen Mirren

0:46:58.181 --> 0:47:00.422
<v Speaker 3>are the people on the ranch who like that. And

0:47:00.502 --> 0:47:02.462
<v Speaker 3>you know it's under threat from a mining company and

0:47:02.462 --> 0:47:05.221
<v Speaker 3>there's all this stuff going on. They want their long

0:47:05.261 --> 0:47:07.582
<v Speaker 3>lost nephew to come back and help them defend the

0:47:07.661 --> 0:47:10.901
<v Speaker 3>legacy because he is a tough guy. He traumatized by

0:47:10.902 --> 0:47:13.781
<v Speaker 3>World War One, is now in Africa where he is

0:47:13.862 --> 0:47:17.781
<v Speaker 3>paid to go and kill man eating lions and leopards, right,

0:47:18.142 --> 0:47:21.262
<v Speaker 3>Could there be a more manly job than that? No, anyway,

0:47:21.302 --> 0:47:23.022
<v Speaker 3>So we go to Africa, we meet him. He's called

0:47:23.062 --> 0:47:26.741
<v Speaker 3>Spencer Dunne. He's played by this guy called Brandon Sclennar

0:47:27.022 --> 0:47:29.622
<v Speaker 3>and I had never met him before, but now he's

0:47:29.661 --> 0:47:30.382
<v Speaker 3>all I think about.

0:47:30.542 --> 0:47:33.181
<v Speaker 2>He was apparel if the good guy in it ends

0:47:33.221 --> 0:47:33.622
<v Speaker 2>with us?

0:47:33.741 --> 0:47:35.382
<v Speaker 4>Oh gorgeous, Yeah.

0:47:35.382 --> 0:47:39.502
<v Speaker 3>Unbelievably gorgeous. And he meets this young english woman blah

0:47:39.502 --> 0:47:41.261
<v Speaker 3>blah blah. Anyway, we don't need to know any more

0:47:41.302 --> 0:47:46.181
<v Speaker 3>details except that their chemistry you know. Sometimes and maybe

0:47:46.181 --> 0:47:47.862
<v Speaker 3>this is just me, but I remember now all the

0:47:47.862 --> 0:47:49.582
<v Speaker 3>way back to being a kid, that you'd watched some

0:47:50.062 --> 0:47:53.302
<v Speaker 3>shows where the chemistry between a couple was so amazing

0:47:53.342 --> 0:47:54.021
<v Speaker 3>it just like.

0:47:54.142 --> 0:47:55.221
<v Speaker 2>Swept you up in it.

0:47:55.261 --> 0:47:55.982
<v Speaker 4>Is it humpy?

0:47:56.221 --> 0:47:56.862
<v Speaker 2>It's humpy?

0:47:56.982 --> 0:47:57.221
<v Speaker 1>Yes?

0:47:57.221 --> 0:47:59.381
<v Speaker 3>In there having these two people are having a lot

0:47:59.422 --> 0:48:03.422
<v Speaker 3>of great sex. But they're not having a lot of

0:48:03.422 --> 0:48:06.301
<v Speaker 3>great sex. Some other people in the house are but

0:48:06.741 --> 0:48:09.781
<v Speaker 3>our friend Spencer and his fancy English lady Alex having

0:48:09.822 --> 0:48:12.462
<v Speaker 3>a lot of great sex. But it's not corny like

0:48:12.542 --> 0:48:15.142
<v Speaker 3>it's what they call closed door sex, right, So you

0:48:15.181 --> 0:48:17.742
<v Speaker 3>see everything leaving offit disappointed a little bit. His shirt's

0:48:17.741 --> 0:48:21.622
<v Speaker 3>off a lot though. There's also this very distressing subplot

0:48:21.661 --> 0:48:24.422
<v Speaker 3>going on that's about Indigenous Americans who've been taken from

0:48:24.462 --> 0:48:27.302
<v Speaker 3>their families and are in a brutal school run by nuns.

0:48:27.382 --> 0:48:30.982
<v Speaker 3>Sounds familiar to Australian viewers, and I've just found myself

0:48:31.502 --> 0:48:34.022
<v Speaker 3>completely swept up in it and it's all I want

0:48:34.062 --> 0:48:34.221
<v Speaker 3>to do.

0:48:34.302 --> 0:48:35.102
<v Speaker 4>I've sold me on it.

0:48:35.181 --> 0:48:36.622
<v Speaker 3>I want to go back and I want to watch

0:48:36.661 --> 0:48:39.382
<v Speaker 3>these people do whatever they're doing. And I don't really

0:48:39.382 --> 0:48:41.181
<v Speaker 3>want Harrison Ford to keep his rent because he's a

0:48:41.221 --> 0:48:44.022
<v Speaker 3>bit of a dick, but I really really want my

0:48:44.062 --> 0:48:45.622
<v Speaker 3>matexpense anyway, So that was a sity.

0:48:45.622 --> 0:48:48.262
<v Speaker 2>I'm only in season one, so don't actually anyhow it happens.

0:48:48.382 --> 0:48:49.181
<v Speaker 2>There are two.

0:48:48.942 --> 0:48:51.542
<v Speaker 3>Seasons and the second one just dropped, so it's called

0:48:51.622 --> 0:48:52.421
<v Speaker 3>nineteen twenty three.

0:48:52.462 --> 0:48:53.661
<v Speaker 2>It's on Paramount Plus.

0:48:53.942 --> 0:48:56.821
<v Speaker 3>It's part of the Yellowstone thing and I am now

0:48:56.822 --> 0:48:57.822
<v Speaker 3>officially obsessed.

0:48:57.982 --> 0:49:01.102
<v Speaker 1>That's like when I got really into Downton Abbey and Bridgington. Yes,

0:49:01.382 --> 0:49:05.022
<v Speaker 1>because the steaks, it just felt so otherworldly. No one

0:49:05.062 --> 0:49:08.221
<v Speaker 1>had phones, and the Gilded Age is coming back too.

0:49:08.701 --> 0:49:09.982
<v Speaker 1>I'm very excited about it.

0:49:10.022 --> 0:49:12.782
<v Speaker 3>Is interesting because I'm not I'm not always a historical

0:49:12.862 --> 0:49:16.181
<v Speaker 3>drama person, but sometimes you know, you just get so

0:49:16.302 --> 0:49:17.942
<v Speaker 3>swept up in it and maybe you need it at

0:49:17.942 --> 0:49:22.502
<v Speaker 3>that time or whatever. But it's an escape, a proper escape. Anyway,

0:49:22.542 --> 0:49:25.341
<v Speaker 3>I'm loving it and that's my Raco. That is all

0:49:25.342 --> 0:49:27.661
<v Speaker 3>we've got time for today, out louders, thank you for

0:49:27.781 --> 0:49:30.102
<v Speaker 3>being with us this week. As always, We're going to

0:49:30.102 --> 0:49:32.261
<v Speaker 3>be back in your ears on Monday, of course, Jesse

0:49:32.342 --> 0:49:34.622
<v Speaker 3>and Mia. What else have we got to tell everybody.

0:49:34.261 --> 0:49:37.102
<v Speaker 4>A big thank you to our team group executive producer

0:49:37.261 --> 0:49:41.781
<v Speaker 4>Ruth Devine, executive producer Emmeline Gazillis, our audio producer is

0:49:41.862 --> 0:49:43.382
<v Speaker 4>Leah Porges, video.

0:49:43.142 --> 0:49:46.502
<v Speaker 1>Producer Josh Green, our junior content producers Coco and Tessa,

0:49:46.701 --> 0:49:49.701
<v Speaker 1>and our studios at Muma Mea are styled with furniture

0:49:49.741 --> 0:49:52.822
<v Speaker 1>from Fenton and Fenton. Visit Fenton and Fenton dot com

0:49:52.862 --> 0:49:56.102
<v Speaker 1>dot au. Before we go, I want to give everyone

0:49:56.181 --> 0:49:58.741
<v Speaker 1>a little treat with another recommendation. I want to play

0:49:58.822 --> 0:50:01.661
<v Speaker 1>us out with a beautiful song by a very dear

0:50:01.661 --> 0:50:04.422
<v Speaker 1>friend of mine that's come out this week. It's pure

0:50:04.422 --> 0:50:08.942
<v Speaker 1>weekend vibes. Her name is Jackie Oberg. She's talented and brilliant.

0:50:08.982 --> 0:50:11.421
<v Speaker 1>Here is her So if I could beat my silhouette,

0:50:11.582 --> 0:50:13.102
<v Speaker 1>We'll put a link in the show notes if you're

0:50:13.142 --> 0:50:14.462
<v Speaker 1>listening on Spotify.

0:50:14.462 --> 0:50:16.421
<v Speaker 4>Bye bye bye.

0:50:17.022 --> 0:50:23.821
<v Speaker 1>Be alone, shy love, whom I do you?

0:50:29.462 --> 0:50:34.142
<v Speaker 2>If I could only be mysel? Would I still be

0:50:34.342 --> 0:50:34.901
<v Speaker 2>too much?

0:50:39.462 --> 0:50:39.622
<v Speaker 1>Oh?

0:50:40.261 --> 0:50:40.941
<v Speaker 5>You love?

0:50:41.382 --> 0:50:42.462
<v Speaker 4>Memory?

0:50:43.622 --> 0:50:44.861
<v Speaker 2>Would let you my.

0:50:48.902 --> 0:50:57.262
<v Speaker 1>Jesus really love. Shout out to any MoMA Maya subscribers listening.

0:50:57.422 --> 0:50:59.701
<v Speaker 1>If you love the show and want to support us

0:50:59.741 --> 0:51:02.261
<v Speaker 1>as well, subscribing to Mom and Maya is the very

0:51:02.302 --> 0:51:04.261
<v Speaker 1>best way to do so. There is a link in

0:51:04.302 --> 0:51:05.382
<v Speaker 1>the episode description