WEBVTT - What Really Led To The Katy Perry Backlash

0:00:11.104 --> 0:00:11.424
<v Speaker 1>So much.

0:00:11.464 --> 0:00:14.144
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to a Muma Mia podcast.

0:00:14.784 --> 0:00:18.664
<v Speaker 3>Mamma Mia acknowledges the traditional owners of land and borders

0:00:18.744 --> 0:00:26.664
<v Speaker 3>that this podcast is recorded on from Mamma Mia. Welcome

0:00:26.664 --> 0:00:29.544
<v Speaker 3>to The Spill, your daily pop culture fix. I'm Laura

0:00:29.624 --> 0:00:32.384
<v Speaker 3>Brodnick and I'm m Vernon And on today's show, we

0:00:32.424 --> 0:00:35.944
<v Speaker 3>are talking about Katie Perry's new rebrand, her new music video.

0:00:36.064 --> 0:00:38.584
<v Speaker 3>There has been an avalanche.

0:00:38.024 --> 0:00:39.624
<v Speaker 4>I think is the right way. That is a correct

0:00:39.624 --> 0:00:40.184
<v Speaker 4>word of.

0:00:40.104 --> 0:00:42.784
<v Speaker 3>Criticism about this, and we're going to delve into what's

0:00:42.824 --> 0:00:45.144
<v Speaker 3>really happening, because I don't think it's as simple as

0:00:45.144 --> 0:00:46.464
<v Speaker 3>she's just released a bad song.

0:00:46.504 --> 0:00:47.184
<v Speaker 4>There's more to it.

0:00:47.544 --> 0:00:51.304
<v Speaker 5>But first, but first, Sharon Stone posted a photo of

0:00:51.304 --> 0:00:54.944
<v Speaker 5>herself on Instagram that's gone absolutely viral. She's wearing lingerie

0:00:55.024 --> 0:00:58.264
<v Speaker 5>sitting like cross legged on a chair as a callback

0:00:58.304 --> 0:01:01.464
<v Speaker 5>to her iconic scene in Basic Instinct, where she's wearing

0:01:01.544 --> 0:01:03.544
<v Speaker 5>kind of like a white mini dress sitting in the

0:01:03.544 --> 0:01:06.824
<v Speaker 5>same position being interrogated by all of these men. I

0:01:07.024 --> 0:01:10.224
<v Speaker 5>personally haven't seen Basic Instinct, but it's on your list,

0:01:10.384 --> 0:01:12.904
<v Speaker 5>it's on my list. But I have seen that scene.

0:01:13.264 --> 0:01:15.104
<v Speaker 3>I would say one of the most famous movie scenes

0:01:15.104 --> 0:01:16.944
<v Speaker 3>of all time. It's one of those movie scenes that

0:01:17.064 --> 0:01:20.264
<v Speaker 3>is so strong that you can just see the even

0:01:20.304 --> 0:01:21.984
<v Speaker 3>just the crop of her head and shoulders in the

0:01:21.984 --> 0:01:24.544
<v Speaker 3>white dress and the way her eyes are looking in

0:01:24.544 --> 0:01:27.264
<v Speaker 3>that scene, and you know exactly what movie and what

0:01:27.424 --> 0:01:30.064
<v Speaker 3>iconic moment it's alluding to, Like what It's that powerful

0:01:30.104 --> 0:01:32.424
<v Speaker 3>that just from a movie still you can tell what's happening.

0:01:32.184 --> 0:01:34.224
<v Speaker 5>Especially because all the men are just sweating and she's

0:01:34.344 --> 0:01:36.504
<v Speaker 5>just so chick and she can't yeah, and she's being

0:01:36.504 --> 0:01:39.584
<v Speaker 5>interrogated and she slowly closes her legs and then puts

0:01:39.624 --> 0:01:41.904
<v Speaker 5>her other leg over and there's a flash.

0:01:42.064 --> 0:01:43.904
<v Speaker 3>And for everyone who wants to go and stop, like,

0:01:44.104 --> 0:01:46.064
<v Speaker 3>watch that part of the movie and pause it. You

0:01:46.104 --> 0:01:48.904
<v Speaker 3>can't really really see. It's like a little flash of skin.

0:01:49.144 --> 0:01:51.864
<v Speaker 5>It's clear that she's not wearing any underwear. Yes, And

0:01:52.144 --> 0:01:55.104
<v Speaker 5>what I didn't know when I was reading about this

0:01:55.184 --> 0:01:59.704
<v Speaker 5>post that she did recently was that she actually claimed

0:01:59.824 --> 0:02:02.664
<v Speaker 5>that she was tricked into not wearing any underwear because

0:02:02.664 --> 0:02:04.864
<v Speaker 5>she was wearing white underwear and they were saying that

0:02:04.904 --> 0:02:06.784
<v Speaker 5>it was reflecting off the lights, so she had to

0:02:06.784 --> 0:02:07.664
<v Speaker 5>take her underwear off.

0:02:07.744 --> 0:02:09.384
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, And that didn't come out until I think it

0:02:09.384 --> 0:02:11.584
<v Speaker 3>was twenty twenty one where she released her memoir The

0:02:11.584 --> 0:02:13.344
<v Speaker 3>Beauty of Living Twice, and that was one of the

0:02:13.344 --> 0:02:15.584
<v Speaker 3>stories that was in it, because up until then everyone

0:02:15.624 --> 0:02:18.104
<v Speaker 3>thought that she was very kind of in on the

0:02:18.144 --> 0:02:20.304
<v Speaker 3>gimmick of doing that and what was happening. And then

0:02:20.344 --> 0:02:22.224
<v Speaker 3>in the book she says, yeah, she's wearing underwear, and

0:02:22.264 --> 0:02:23.824
<v Speaker 3>they kept saying, like, oh, can we just get one

0:02:23.904 --> 0:02:26.944
<v Speaker 3>shot with the underwear off because it's reflecting the light

0:02:26.984 --> 0:02:29.024
<v Speaker 3>and we're getting this like weird flash every time the

0:02:29.104 --> 0:02:31.384
<v Speaker 3>camera goes, but I promise you we won't see anything.

0:02:31.744 --> 0:02:33.424
<v Speaker 3>So she did it, and then that's the take that

0:02:33.584 --> 0:02:35.904
<v Speaker 3>was in the movie, and the filmmakers have said that's

0:02:35.984 --> 0:02:38.784
<v Speaker 3>not true and kind of refuted what she was saying.

0:02:38.784 --> 0:02:40.744
<v Speaker 3>But she's really stuck to that story over the last

0:02:40.784 --> 0:02:41.304
<v Speaker 3>couple of years.

0:02:41.344 --> 0:02:43.464
<v Speaker 5>I love how she's stuck to that story, but like,

0:02:43.824 --> 0:02:47.424
<v Speaker 5>hasn't let that take over the entire storyline of that

0:02:47.544 --> 0:02:50.544
<v Speaker 5>soh yeah. Like the fact that she's recreated this position

0:02:50.664 --> 0:02:53.024
<v Speaker 5>so many times and now she's in the sixties and

0:02:53.024 --> 0:02:55.464
<v Speaker 5>she still looks so amazing, and the fact that she's

0:02:55.504 --> 0:02:57.784
<v Speaker 5>just like given herself back the narrative I think is

0:02:57.864 --> 0:02:58.264
<v Speaker 5>really cool.

0:02:58.344 --> 0:03:14.184
<v Speaker 1>Nana Nana.

0:03:14.824 --> 0:03:18.304
<v Speaker 5>So when I first heard the song, I was like, Okay,

0:03:18.344 --> 0:03:23.504
<v Speaker 5>I understand. It's obviously very satire. It feels very poignant

0:03:23.624 --> 0:03:26.664
<v Speaker 5>on like what feminism is. It's pretty much just talking

0:03:26.664 --> 0:03:28.544
<v Speaker 5>about feminism as being feminism.

0:03:29.024 --> 0:03:31.544
<v Speaker 4>I picture the song because I quite like the chorus.

0:03:31.744 --> 0:03:33.144
<v Speaker 4>It's very damn I.

0:03:33.144 --> 0:03:35.744
<v Speaker 3>Kind of like it too. It took me a while.

0:03:35.824 --> 0:03:38.624
<v Speaker 3>I think the magic of pop songs is that their repetitiveness.

0:03:38.624 --> 0:03:40.424
<v Speaker 3>A lot of the time, if you hear a song

0:03:40.464 --> 0:03:42.424
<v Speaker 3>on the radio, like old school how we used to

0:03:42.544 --> 0:03:44.744
<v Speaker 3>hear on the radio like millions of times a day,

0:03:44.984 --> 0:03:46.824
<v Speaker 3>and it weaves its way into your head and that's

0:03:46.824 --> 0:03:48.944
<v Speaker 3>why you start to like it. And I've got to say,

0:03:48.984 --> 0:03:50.944
<v Speaker 3>listen to this song so many times because I actually

0:03:50.984 --> 0:03:52.784
<v Speaker 3>heard it for the rest of the world, not to

0:03:53.584 --> 0:03:55.864
<v Speaker 3>you did hear before this, Not to you know, make

0:03:55.864 --> 0:03:59.024
<v Speaker 3>anyone jealous, But yes. I went into Universal Music Offices,

0:03:59.424 --> 0:04:01.664
<v Speaker 3>very close to Mummea offices actually, for a little pre

0:04:01.784 --> 0:04:04.344
<v Speaker 3>listening party before the song came out. And I listened

0:04:04.344 --> 0:04:05.864
<v Speaker 3>to it in a room with a bunch of people

0:04:05.904 --> 0:04:07.064
<v Speaker 3>and champagne and stuff.

0:04:06.864 --> 0:04:08.064
<v Speaker 4>And people like bopping along.

0:04:08.144 --> 0:04:11.344
<v Speaker 3>And my first thought listening to it is it sounds

0:04:11.864 --> 0:04:14.904
<v Speaker 3>like a song that would play at the beginning of

0:04:14.944 --> 0:04:17.704
<v Speaker 3>like an early two thousands rom com in terms.

0:04:17.504 --> 0:04:20.544
<v Speaker 5>Of what the exact same note literally mine was like,

0:04:20.664 --> 0:04:24.064
<v Speaker 5>so the rom com start, Yeah, she breaks up with

0:04:24.144 --> 0:04:25.704
<v Speaker 5>her terrible toxic.

0:04:26.264 --> 0:04:29.504
<v Speaker 4>A beautiful apartment in New York and she put five.

0:04:29.384 --> 0:04:31.344
<v Speaker 5>Years and then she's like walking on the street and

0:04:31.344 --> 0:04:32.784
<v Speaker 5>her friends are there and like.

0:04:32.704 --> 0:04:34.784
<v Speaker 3>And she's whipping off her sunglasses and going into her

0:04:34.824 --> 0:04:36.864
<v Speaker 3>like publishing job in New York where she makes it so.

0:04:37.064 --> 0:04:39.664
<v Speaker 5>Exactly we need, we need someone to make a rom

0:04:39.664 --> 0:04:41.424
<v Speaker 5>commented Star Kate Hudson.

0:04:41.704 --> 0:04:43.984
<v Speaker 3>Anyway, Apart from that, like, it also sounds kind of

0:04:44.104 --> 0:04:47.264
<v Speaker 3>very eighties and but I can also understand the criticism

0:04:47.384 --> 0:04:50.504
<v Speaker 3>of it that people think it sounds a bit manufactured.

0:04:50.744 --> 0:04:53.624
<v Speaker 5>Yes, And I think that's what the original criticism was

0:04:53.704 --> 0:04:55.904
<v Speaker 5>for the song when it came out, and she kind

0:04:55.904 --> 0:04:58.784
<v Speaker 5>of doubled down with the music videos, like kind of

0:04:58.784 --> 0:05:02.264
<v Speaker 5>showing that it very much is satire. So before we

0:05:02.304 --> 0:05:04.704
<v Speaker 5>go into like all the commentary behind the music video,

0:05:04.744 --> 0:05:06.904
<v Speaker 5>I just want to take you through some of the symbolism.

0:05:06.944 --> 0:05:07.904
<v Speaker 4>Oh yes, within it.

0:05:08.104 --> 0:05:11.224
<v Speaker 5>I did a big investigative research piece to this. So

0:05:11.304 --> 0:05:14.304
<v Speaker 5>it starts off with a construction site. There's a sign

0:05:14.344 --> 0:05:16.664
<v Speaker 5>that says men at work and then they write wo,

0:05:16.904 --> 0:05:20.504
<v Speaker 5>so women at work. They then do the iconic scene

0:05:20.544 --> 0:05:23.464
<v Speaker 5>of lunch atop a skyscraper that everyone does.

0:05:23.904 --> 0:05:26.504
<v Speaker 3>Yes, well, that was an image that came out that

0:05:26.624 --> 0:05:29.064
<v Speaker 3>became this very famous image of these men on a

0:05:29.104 --> 0:05:32.384
<v Speaker 3>big construction being raised above New York having lunch and

0:05:32.424 --> 0:05:34.944
<v Speaker 3>it looks so dangerous and exciting, and it came out

0:05:34.944 --> 0:05:36.304
<v Speaker 3>it was like a setup.

0:05:35.904 --> 0:05:39.344
<v Speaker 4>Shot as promotion for the sky scrape. Yeah, but it works.

0:05:39.424 --> 0:05:39.904
<v Speaker 4>It worked.

0:05:40.264 --> 0:05:43.504
<v Speaker 5>She cause plays as Josie the Riveter, which is like

0:05:43.544 --> 0:05:47.144
<v Speaker 5>the iconic women's World War two. Women can do anything.

0:05:47.224 --> 0:05:48.904
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, if you've seen that picture around, women can do

0:05:48.944 --> 0:05:52.024
<v Speaker 3>anything where she's like making the fear and head Yeah.

0:05:52.104 --> 0:05:55.144
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, she's drinking whiskey for women.

0:05:55.384 --> 0:05:55.944
<v Speaker 1>I liked that.

0:05:56.064 --> 0:05:57.824
<v Speaker 3>I thought that was really funny because it's a really

0:05:57.864 --> 0:06:00.584
<v Speaker 3>interesting nod to all these products that are for women,

0:06:00.744 --> 0:06:03.344
<v Speaker 3>like a women's razor or a women's cup or a

0:06:03.384 --> 0:06:05.504
<v Speaker 3>women's anything, and then you put a little bit of

0:06:05.504 --> 0:06:07.224
<v Speaker 3>pink on it and you have to pay more money

0:06:07.264 --> 0:06:08.984
<v Speaker 3>for it. So I actually thought that was because you

0:06:09.024 --> 0:06:10.784
<v Speaker 3>know that women's whiskey is more expensive.

0:06:10.824 --> 0:06:14.944
<v Speaker 5>And then there's like a lot of beauty products featured.

0:06:15.024 --> 0:06:18.424
<v Speaker 5>She has like sex toys, she's got like ger she's

0:06:18.464 --> 0:06:21.184
<v Speaker 5>got like little led face masks. We also did a

0:06:21.224 --> 0:06:24.104
<v Speaker 5>piece on Mamma Mia called the Hidden Details you might

0:06:24.104 --> 0:06:26.144
<v Speaker 5>have Missed in Katie Perry's music video, and I couldn't

0:06:26.184 --> 0:06:28.264
<v Speaker 5>read it without laughing. It's so funny. I want to

0:06:28.264 --> 0:06:30.784
<v Speaker 5>read you a little bit. It said, from hammering to

0:06:30.904 --> 0:06:34.984
<v Speaker 5>dancing to completing an extensive routine. The first version of

0:06:35.064 --> 0:06:37.504
<v Speaker 5>Katie we see in the music video has a lot

0:06:37.584 --> 0:06:41.344
<v Speaker 5>going on. When an enormous anvil inexplicably drops on the

0:06:41.384 --> 0:06:44.864
<v Speaker 5>construction site version of Katie, she's reborn down on the

0:06:44.904 --> 0:06:47.824
<v Speaker 5>streets now wearing a white bikini and bionic legs.

0:06:48.224 --> 0:06:49.704
<v Speaker 3>I mean that storytelling.

0:06:50.344 --> 0:06:51.504
<v Speaker 4>It is storytelling.

0:06:51.784 --> 0:06:54.424
<v Speaker 5>So she kind of becomes like this bionic woman. She's

0:06:54.464 --> 0:06:57.064
<v Speaker 5>seen like with the petrol pump in her thigh, like

0:06:57.144 --> 0:07:00.024
<v Speaker 5>as she's refueling herself, which I thought was very interesting.

0:07:00.504 --> 0:07:03.504
<v Speaker 5>Tricia Petus, who's a famous YouTuber, is suddenly there.

0:07:03.544 --> 0:07:05.224
<v Speaker 4>She's pulling a truck on by back. Wait.

0:07:05.304 --> 0:07:07.504
<v Speaker 3>Tricia Peters is the one who thought the queen was

0:07:07.544 --> 0:07:10.064
<v Speaker 3>going to be reincarnated as her daughter.

0:07:10.344 --> 0:07:12.544
<v Speaker 5>No She's the one who we thought the queen was

0:07:12.544 --> 0:07:14.704
<v Speaker 5>gonna be a recinded in her daughter, and then it happened.

0:07:14.944 --> 0:07:17.224
<v Speaker 3>Oh sorry for that.

0:07:17.384 --> 0:07:18.664
<v Speaker 4>I don't want to mess up history.

0:07:18.704 --> 0:07:20.224
<v Speaker 5>There's also this other line that I have to read

0:07:20.264 --> 0:07:22.944
<v Speaker 5>because it's so funny. In the final scenes, Katie joins

0:07:22.944 --> 0:07:25.784
<v Speaker 5>an influencer to film a TikTok dance before stealing her

0:07:25.824 --> 0:07:28.624
<v Speaker 5>ring light and jumping on a helicopter. As the influencer

0:07:28.704 --> 0:07:31.384
<v Speaker 5>yells who are you to the singer, she lifts the

0:07:31.464 --> 0:07:33.864
<v Speaker 5>ring light, shaped like a gender symbol for female, into

0:07:33.944 --> 0:07:36.064
<v Speaker 5>the air and screams, I am Katy Perry.

0:07:36.584 --> 0:07:37.664
<v Speaker 4>That's factually correct.

0:07:37.904 --> 0:07:40.344
<v Speaker 5>I'm just gonna say I thought it was so good,

0:07:40.424 --> 0:07:43.544
<v Speaker 5>Like I love the music video. Not everyone did, in fact,

0:07:43.624 --> 0:07:46.384
<v Speaker 5>most people didn't, But I just thought it was the

0:07:46.424 --> 0:07:50.384
<v Speaker 5>funniest way to kind of show how feminism has developed

0:07:50.384 --> 0:07:52.984
<v Speaker 5>into this big thing in modern day that now everyone's

0:07:53.024 --> 0:07:55.424
<v Speaker 5>kind of jumping on a bandwagon forgetting the real meaning

0:07:55.504 --> 0:07:55.944
<v Speaker 5>behind it.

0:07:56.184 --> 0:07:59.024
<v Speaker 3>I didn't completely understand what she was trying to say there,

0:07:59.064 --> 0:08:00.544
<v Speaker 3>and I mean I don't think it was anything when

0:08:00.544 --> 0:08:02.064
<v Speaker 3>there was meant to be a hidden secret. It was

0:08:02.104 --> 0:08:04.664
<v Speaker 3>all very kind of heavy handed in terms of like

0:08:04.904 --> 0:08:07.024
<v Speaker 3>this is what a woman is and feminism gets pulled

0:08:07.024 --> 0:08:10.264
<v Speaker 3>away and so but I just think with Katy Perry,

0:08:10.704 --> 0:08:15.744
<v Speaker 3>sometimes satire isn't where she excels. She's kind of almost

0:08:15.784 --> 0:08:18.224
<v Speaker 3>better doing that when she forges her own path and

0:08:18.264 --> 0:08:24.144
<v Speaker 3>does that more flippant and frothy, almost animation, unrealistic, very

0:08:24.224 --> 0:08:27.024
<v Speaker 3>stylized art form, which I think a lot of people

0:08:27.064 --> 0:08:28.624
<v Speaker 3>are saying, like, oh, she was never that popular, she's

0:08:28.704 --> 0:08:30.224
<v Speaker 3>now that good, and like she was, she was one

0:08:30.224 --> 0:08:32.544
<v Speaker 3>of the top selling female artists in the world for

0:08:32.584 --> 0:08:36.704
<v Speaker 3>a very long time, and she had a very unique

0:08:36.864 --> 0:08:39.544
<v Speaker 3>look about everything she did. And I think the fact

0:08:39.584 --> 0:08:41.544
<v Speaker 3>that she just sold out a whole bunch of Las

0:08:41.624 --> 0:08:45.424
<v Speaker 3>Vegas residencies with Katy Perry's World, like her show, and

0:08:45.464 --> 0:08:48.184
<v Speaker 3>that her signature is very telling, and so I feel

0:08:48.184 --> 0:08:50.464
<v Speaker 3>like she tried to tap into that here and it

0:08:50.584 --> 0:08:53.864
<v Speaker 3>just maybe slightly missed the mark a little bit. But

0:08:53.904 --> 0:08:56.224
<v Speaker 3>the foundation she was building on is there, I guess,

0:08:56.264 --> 0:08:57.064
<v Speaker 3>is what I'm trying to say.

0:08:57.224 --> 0:08:59.744
<v Speaker 5>There were a lot of brutal headlines far from nice.

0:08:59.784 --> 0:09:02.144
<v Speaker 5>I want to read some out. We don't want to

0:09:02.144 --> 0:09:05.464
<v Speaker 5>live in Katy Perry's women's world. A fail feminist anthem

0:09:05.944 --> 0:09:08.544
<v Speaker 5>is the feminism in the room with us. Katy Perry

0:09:08.584 --> 0:09:10.704
<v Speaker 5>just flopped so hard can she cover?

0:09:11.784 --> 0:09:12.544
<v Speaker 4>And she recovered.

0:09:12.624 --> 0:09:14.464
<v Speaker 3>Well, that's what we're gonna get into next, because obviously

0:09:14.464 --> 0:09:16.304
<v Speaker 3>she's got a new album coming, there's a lot more

0:09:16.304 --> 0:09:18.664
<v Speaker 3>coming from her, and that's what everyone's asking is, we're

0:09:18.704 --> 0:09:19.504
<v Speaker 3>too from here.

0:09:21.664 --> 0:09:25.704
<v Speaker 2>You go, girl, you were born to shine, and we're

0:09:25.744 --> 0:09:30.184
<v Speaker 2>kind of just having fun being a bit sarcastic with it.

0:09:30.184 --> 0:09:36.264
<v Speaker 2>It's very slapstick and very on the nose, and with

0:09:36.424 --> 0:09:42.144
<v Speaker 2>this set, it's like, oh, we're like, we're not about

0:09:42.264 --> 0:09:43.264
<v Speaker 2>the mail gates, but.

0:09:43.184 --> 0:09:45.624
<v Speaker 1>We really are about the male gaze, and.

0:09:45.584 --> 0:09:48.144
<v Speaker 2>We're really overplaying it and on the nose.

0:09:48.384 --> 0:09:50.544
<v Speaker 3>I think one of the reasons why people have responded

0:09:50.584 --> 0:09:53.224
<v Speaker 3>so negatively to Katie Perry's new song, apart from the

0:09:53.264 --> 0:09:56.824
<v Speaker 3>fact that a lot of music critics just genuinely didn't

0:09:56.904 --> 0:09:59.064
<v Speaker 3>like the material and that's their job to write their

0:09:59.104 --> 0:10:00.584
<v Speaker 3>thoughts and we don't want to take that away and

0:10:00.624 --> 0:10:03.064
<v Speaker 3>have them hunted down like Taylor Swift fans too, like

0:10:03.104 --> 0:10:05.504
<v Speaker 3>you've still got to have that musical journalism. But I

0:10:05.504 --> 0:10:08.064
<v Speaker 3>think there was so much build up to it and

0:10:08.384 --> 0:10:11.104
<v Speaker 3>so much pipe around, like Katie peer, he's coming back

0:10:11.104 --> 0:10:12.904
<v Speaker 3>and she's got this rebrand, and that is a good

0:10:12.944 --> 0:10:14.424
<v Speaker 3>thing in many ways, but I think a lot of

0:10:14.424 --> 0:10:17.944
<v Speaker 3>people also love to see a very famous woman fail

0:10:18.144 --> 0:10:20.424
<v Speaker 3>and have a very public misstep, and I think a

0:10:20.464 --> 0:10:22.504
<v Speaker 3>lot of it was linked to that in a way,

0:10:22.864 --> 0:10:25.784
<v Speaker 3>because she finished up on American Idol, where she'd been

0:10:25.784 --> 0:10:28.304
<v Speaker 3>a judge for a long time, and then after Las Vegas,

0:10:28.384 --> 0:10:30.344
<v Speaker 3>there was like the safety of that residency of like

0:10:30.384 --> 0:10:32.064
<v Speaker 3>you know, you only saw it if you had a ticket,

0:10:32.344 --> 0:10:35.304
<v Speaker 3>and fans really loved it, and because she hadn't had

0:10:35.344 --> 0:10:36.904
<v Speaker 3>a hit song for a long time and had been

0:10:36.904 --> 0:10:39.464
<v Speaker 3>like many years since she released her last album, and

0:10:39.544 --> 0:10:41.944
<v Speaker 3>she was also really hyping like this is a new sound,

0:10:41.944 --> 0:10:44.024
<v Speaker 3>this is a new meat. And one of the things

0:10:44.024 --> 0:10:46.024
<v Speaker 3>I thought was really interesting was that she had a

0:10:46.184 --> 0:10:50.904
<v Speaker 3>very fashion makeover leading into launching this song, and she

0:10:50.944 --> 0:10:53.104
<v Speaker 3>was at a lot of different events in these like

0:10:53.304 --> 0:10:57.424
<v Speaker 3>really amazing less pop princess, like no big white boots

0:10:57.424 --> 0:11:00.224
<v Speaker 3>and sparkly dress and no ice cream boobs or high

0:11:00.224 --> 0:11:03.304
<v Speaker 3>ponytails or anything like that. It was much sleeker, much

0:11:03.304 --> 0:11:05.984
<v Speaker 3>more fashionable. She actually has a young Australian stylist called

0:11:05.984 --> 0:11:09.304
<v Speaker 3>Taddiana Waterford, who's done all of her fashion makeover and

0:11:09.344 --> 0:11:11.584
<v Speaker 3>styles her. And I think even when she was like

0:11:11.584 --> 0:11:13.784
<v Speaker 3>events of like Vogue World and stuff, people were talking

0:11:13.824 --> 0:11:15.744
<v Speaker 3>about how amazing she looked. And she also had all

0:11:15.784 --> 0:11:19.904
<v Speaker 3>the lyrics to Women's World on a cage going in

0:11:20.264 --> 0:11:22.744
<v Speaker 3>and people were also just talking about how amazing she looked.

0:11:22.744 --> 0:11:24.584
<v Speaker 3>And I've got to say, like her body does look

0:11:24.624 --> 0:11:27.584
<v Speaker 3>a bit different in terms of like she looks like

0:11:27.624 --> 0:11:29.744
<v Speaker 3>slightly smaller. It's that whole thing of like a woman

0:11:29.744 --> 0:11:32.304
<v Speaker 3>can have a big makeover as long as she looks

0:11:32.304 --> 0:11:35.344
<v Speaker 3>really ripped as well doing it. And so I think

0:11:35.384 --> 0:11:37.144
<v Speaker 3>she was trying to tick every box of like this

0:11:37.224 --> 0:11:39.024
<v Speaker 3>is what I know people like. They like a woman's

0:11:39.024 --> 0:11:41.384
<v Speaker 3>body to look different, they like her to start dressing

0:11:41.424 --> 0:11:44.104
<v Speaker 3>more high fashion, they like her to talk about now

0:11:44.184 --> 0:11:46.224
<v Speaker 3>I'm a mother, now I'm this. Like she was doing

0:11:46.264 --> 0:11:49.344
<v Speaker 3>everything right, but it's like all those things together put

0:11:49.384 --> 0:11:51.184
<v Speaker 3>people offside before they even heard the song.

0:11:51.544 --> 0:11:54.184
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, and she I remember her on TikTok falling into

0:11:54.184 --> 0:11:57.024
<v Speaker 5>that trope of is she fashionable or is she just skinny?

0:11:57.464 --> 0:11:57.824
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:11:57.824 --> 0:12:00.864
<v Speaker 3>And I think that, I mean she's always been super skinny.

0:12:01.344 --> 0:12:04.944
<v Speaker 3>We're talking in these ridiculous entertainment things that we have

0:12:05.024 --> 0:12:06.944
<v Speaker 3>for women at the moment around bodies and stuff which

0:12:06.984 --> 0:12:08.664
<v Speaker 3>has just gone off the rails, and she can't be

0:12:08.664 --> 0:12:09.744
<v Speaker 3>held responsible for that.

0:12:09.904 --> 0:12:11.824
<v Speaker 5>But she also, like a lot of other artists like

0:12:11.864 --> 0:12:15.384
<v Speaker 5>Taylor Swift, like does a full makeover rebrand for every

0:12:15.424 --> 0:12:17.744
<v Speaker 5>album you put out. And I think I didn't read

0:12:17.744 --> 0:12:19.304
<v Speaker 5>too much into it because I just saw it as

0:12:19.344 --> 0:12:22.144
<v Speaker 5>like another era of Katy Perry, which is why I

0:12:22.184 --> 0:12:24.544
<v Speaker 5>really enjoyed the ending of that music video where she

0:12:24.664 --> 0:12:26.944
<v Speaker 5>was like, I'm Katy Perry, because she has talked about

0:12:26.944 --> 0:12:30.224
<v Speaker 5>how this music in particular is the most.

0:12:29.944 --> 0:12:31.864
<v Speaker 3>Like her, yes, and because her real name is what

0:12:31.904 --> 0:12:35.544
<v Speaker 3>Catherine Hudson, Tate Hudson, So she's like just referring that

0:12:35.624 --> 0:12:37.904
<v Speaker 3>I am Katy Perry right now, but in real life,

0:12:37.944 --> 0:12:41.304
<v Speaker 3>I am had Friend Hudson. I think the other thing

0:12:41.344 --> 0:12:43.784
<v Speaker 3>that people have really called out, and this is like

0:12:43.824 --> 0:12:46.224
<v Speaker 3>a serious thing that I think deserves a lot of attention,

0:12:46.864 --> 0:12:49.824
<v Speaker 3>is that in this new album there's a lot of

0:12:49.864 --> 0:12:53.304
<v Speaker 3>collaboration with Doctor Luke, who's an old collaborator of hers

0:12:53.304 --> 0:12:55.224
<v Speaker 3>and actually worked on a lot of her big hits

0:12:55.224 --> 0:12:57.144
<v Speaker 3>in the past. They haven't worked together for a while,

0:12:57.424 --> 0:12:59.864
<v Speaker 3>but they've come back together for this new album. And

0:13:00.064 --> 0:13:03.144
<v Speaker 3>why people are upset about that is that with doctor Luke.

0:13:03.224 --> 0:13:07.944
<v Speaker 3>In twenty fourteen, Kesher sued him for sexual assault and battery,

0:13:08.064 --> 0:13:12.064
<v Speaker 3>sexual harassment, gender violence, and emotional abuse. Doctor Luke always

0:13:12.064 --> 0:13:15.504
<v Speaker 3>denied the claims, and then he counter seed Kesha for defamation,

0:13:16.104 --> 0:13:20.064
<v Speaker 3>alleging that Kesher, her mother, and her management had fabricated

0:13:20.104 --> 0:13:22.664
<v Speaker 3>all of these claims to get out of a record

0:13:22.664 --> 0:13:25.824
<v Speaker 3>contract with him that she had previously signed. This went

0:13:25.864 --> 0:13:27.944
<v Speaker 3>on for a long time, and Kesha has spoken about

0:13:27.944 --> 0:13:29.784
<v Speaker 3>why it sort of kept her for releasing music for

0:13:29.824 --> 0:13:33.144
<v Speaker 3>a long time. And then in twenty sixteen a judge

0:13:33.144 --> 0:13:37.144
<v Speaker 3>dismissed all of Kesh's claims. Kesher also made allegations that

0:13:37.224 --> 0:13:40.144
<v Speaker 3>doctor Luke had raped Katy Perry, which Katy Perry and

0:13:40.224 --> 0:13:43.384
<v Speaker 3>doctor Luke have always denied, and then in twenty twenty

0:13:43.424 --> 0:13:46.584
<v Speaker 3>a judge rule that Kesher had made defamatory comments by

0:13:46.624 --> 0:13:49.864
<v Speaker 3>saying that, and so in twenty twenty three, Luke and

0:13:49.944 --> 0:13:54.544
<v Speaker 3>Kesher settled this defamation claim. So very lot yeah, so

0:13:54.664 --> 0:13:57.784
<v Speaker 3>a lot of really upsetting facts and allegations in there.

0:13:58.144 --> 0:13:59.944
<v Speaker 3>It should also be said that like doctor Luke, has

0:13:59.984 --> 0:14:02.824
<v Speaker 3>never been convictive of anything, but across the music industry,

0:14:03.184 --> 0:14:04.944
<v Speaker 3>there have been a lot of allegations from a lot

0:14:04.984 --> 0:14:07.464
<v Speaker 3>of different people, and there's this thought that people don't

0:14:07.544 --> 0:14:10.464
<v Speaker 3>across the industry, particularly women, don't want to work with

0:14:10.544 --> 0:14:14.144
<v Speaker 3>him anymore. So when Katy Perry released a feminist anthem

0:14:14.264 --> 0:14:17.344
<v Speaker 3>called Woman's World and she was a collaborator with this

0:14:17.544 --> 0:14:20.504
<v Speaker 3>man who had had these accusations against him, a lot

0:14:20.544 --> 0:14:22.784
<v Speaker 3>of people thought that those two things shouldn't go together

0:14:22.864 --> 0:14:24.104
<v Speaker 3>and really judged her for that.

0:14:24.024 --> 0:14:26.784
<v Speaker 5>Which is a fair criticism. And I'm surprised that she

0:14:26.904 --> 0:14:30.744
<v Speaker 5>hasn't commented on that in particular because I'm also surprised

0:14:30.744 --> 0:14:32.544
<v Speaker 5>why she chose him in the first place, Like she's

0:14:32.624 --> 0:14:37.504
<v Speaker 5>Katy Perry.

0:14:35.544 --> 0:14:37.584
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I know, not just sort of defending her at all.

0:14:37.664 --> 0:14:39.504
<v Speaker 3>I think that that sort of this conversation is an

0:14:39.504 --> 0:14:41.304
<v Speaker 3>important one to have. I just think we don't know

0:14:41.664 --> 0:14:43.784
<v Speaker 3>in terms of like did she still have a contract

0:14:43.824 --> 0:14:45.584
<v Speaker 3>with him, Like you know, sometimes you sign a certain

0:14:45.584 --> 0:14:47.824
<v Speaker 3>amount of albums you have to do with someone. Also,

0:14:47.904 --> 0:14:49.784
<v Speaker 3>a lot of her most popular songs have been in

0:14:49.824 --> 0:14:51.824
<v Speaker 3>collaboration with him. So if you're wanting to have this

0:14:51.904 --> 0:14:54.904
<v Speaker 3>kind of big comeback, you maybe sometimes would defer to

0:14:54.944 --> 0:14:56.544
<v Speaker 3>the person you'd worked with in the past. So I

0:14:56.584 --> 0:14:57.504
<v Speaker 3>just think it's very laated.

0:14:57.624 --> 0:14:59.424
<v Speaker 5>I don't think it would have been as big of

0:14:59.464 --> 0:15:03.104
<v Speaker 5>a deal if the album was about something else than feminism.

0:15:03.304 --> 0:15:05.864
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, but because it is, it just feels a bit gross.

0:15:05.944 --> 0:15:07.344
<v Speaker 3>I don't think it would have been a big of

0:15:07.384 --> 0:15:10.464
<v Speaker 3>a deal for people if people liked the song. I

0:15:10.504 --> 0:15:12.984
<v Speaker 3>know that sounds really simplistic, but if people like a

0:15:13.024 --> 0:15:14.704
<v Speaker 3>song or a piece of art or anything like that,

0:15:14.864 --> 0:15:17.264
<v Speaker 3>you can be forgiven nearly anything in the entertainm industry,

0:15:17.264 --> 0:15:19.384
<v Speaker 3>Like we've seen it time and time again. It's a

0:15:19.424 --> 0:15:21.944
<v Speaker 3>fair criticism, but I think there's a small group of

0:15:21.944 --> 0:15:24.784
<v Speaker 3>people that are really kind of were not going to

0:15:24.984 --> 0:15:26.704
<v Speaker 3>like it. In any case, there's been a.

0:15:26.664 --> 0:15:29.504
<v Speaker 5>Lot of commentary talking about how she's stuck in twenty ten,

0:15:29.984 --> 0:15:32.144
<v Speaker 5>which is kind of where she had like her big

0:15:32.304 --> 0:15:35.504
<v Speaker 5>I guess, like her big shot at stardom. It was like, well,

0:15:35.544 --> 0:15:38.224
<v Speaker 5>after I kissed a girl during her teenage dream kind

0:15:38.264 --> 0:15:41.024
<v Speaker 5>of years. Yeah, and I do remember that. What this

0:15:41.144 --> 0:15:43.584
<v Speaker 5>music video reminded me of is her music video she

0:15:43.744 --> 0:15:48.104
<v Speaker 5>did for TGIF Last Friday Night with Rebecca Black.

0:15:48.224 --> 0:15:49.784
<v Speaker 3>Oh, that's a great music video.

0:15:50.064 --> 0:15:52.424
<v Speaker 5>It just reminded me how it was during that time

0:15:52.504 --> 0:15:55.664
<v Speaker 5>where Rebecca Black put out Friday she got absolutely slammed

0:15:55.744 --> 0:15:57.624
<v Speaker 5>on the Internet. I think it was the first form

0:15:57.664 --> 0:16:00.424
<v Speaker 5>of like severe internet trolling we've ever seen, and she

0:16:00.584 --> 0:16:02.384
<v Speaker 5>was like thirteen years old. She was just doing it

0:16:02.424 --> 0:16:06.064
<v Speaker 5>for fun. Katie Perry made a song called Last Friday Night,

0:16:06.304 --> 0:16:09.264
<v Speaker 5>had Rebecca Black in the music video and literally rebranded

0:16:09.384 --> 0:16:12.304
<v Speaker 5>Rebecca blackause that song just went off, and it felt

0:16:12.304 --> 0:16:14.064
<v Speaker 5>like she was trying to do the same thing for

0:16:14.224 --> 0:16:16.144
<v Speaker 5>Tricia Patus in this music video.

0:16:16.344 --> 0:16:18.984
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, she's always been really good at tapping into internet memes,

0:16:19.024 --> 0:16:21.784
<v Speaker 3>internet culture, whether it's bringing people who have had like

0:16:21.824 --> 0:16:24.584
<v Speaker 3>a viral TikTok on something on stage or something like

0:16:24.624 --> 0:16:26.784
<v Speaker 3>that back in the day bringing them into her music video.

0:16:27.224 --> 0:16:29.864
<v Speaker 3>That's the thing. It's like she's doing almost everything right,

0:16:29.904 --> 0:16:32.424
<v Speaker 3>but it's just not landing. And it's interesting why it's

0:16:32.424 --> 0:16:34.584
<v Speaker 3>not landing for her, but it is when you look

0:16:34.624 --> 0:16:38.264
<v Speaker 3>around the other pop stars that we're really gravitating towards

0:16:38.304 --> 0:16:40.944
<v Speaker 3>at the moment. It's like Chapelmarone has blown up so

0:16:41.104 --> 0:16:43.824
<v Speaker 3>much and her style is so obviously I think like

0:16:43.864 --> 0:16:46.704
<v Speaker 3>her current songs are better than Katie Pere's new song.

0:16:46.784 --> 0:16:49.864
<v Speaker 3>But also it's this very kind of like hyper feminized,

0:16:49.944 --> 0:16:53.744
<v Speaker 3>like pop star, very girlhood music and we're loving it.

0:16:53.824 --> 0:16:56.664
<v Speaker 3>And then I think like Sabrina Carpenter is the most

0:16:56.704 --> 0:17:00.424
<v Speaker 3>intense throwback to an old pop star era of like

0:17:00.464 --> 0:17:03.784
<v Speaker 3>a tiny blonde woman dancing on the stage, polypood dance

0:17:03.824 --> 0:17:05.864
<v Speaker 3>around the stage, and a cute little pop star outfits

0:17:05.904 --> 0:17:09.024
<v Speaker 3>singing silly little songs. Like that's so retro, but it

0:17:09.224 --> 0:17:11.144
<v Speaker 3>feels like it's really hitting at the moment.

0:17:11.144 --> 0:17:15.704
<v Speaker 5>And Charlie XX well, like they're all three different pop stars,

0:17:15.904 --> 0:17:18.904
<v Speaker 5>and like they're all pop stars but in three different categories.

0:17:19.304 --> 0:17:21.824
<v Speaker 5>And it feels like what's interesting with them is that

0:17:21.864 --> 0:17:24.544
<v Speaker 5>they've been doing music for a long time, but they've

0:17:24.744 --> 0:17:28.104
<v Speaker 5>never changed themselves for a new album, Like they constantly

0:17:28.104 --> 0:17:31.024
<v Speaker 5>stick to like what they know, what they love, Like

0:17:31.224 --> 0:17:32.384
<v Speaker 5>I think a lot of I've seen a lot of

0:17:32.384 --> 0:17:34.904
<v Speaker 5>memes with them comparing them to the Powerpuff Girls, like

0:17:34.944 --> 0:17:38.584
<v Speaker 5>shapeul Roan and then Serena Carpenter is like cute c girlye.

0:17:38.664 --> 0:17:42.264
<v Speaker 5>Charlie XCX is like sexy girly, and then Katy Perry

0:17:42.304 --> 0:17:44.784
<v Speaker 5>is just like constantly trying to evolve, to keep up,

0:17:44.824 --> 0:17:46.864
<v Speaker 5>and I feel like she can't keep up right now.

0:17:46.984 --> 0:17:50.384
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, maybe like she's slightly mischarged turn her team. They

0:17:50.424 --> 0:17:53.184
<v Speaker 3>think we want this big feminist anthem, which also sounds

0:17:53.184 --> 0:17:54.824
<v Speaker 3>like it's been made for TikTok, And we know that's

0:17:54.864 --> 0:17:56.584
<v Speaker 3>how artists get their songs play at the moment if

0:17:56.584 --> 0:17:58.704
<v Speaker 3>people sample the song on TikTok. So it feels like

0:17:58.744 --> 0:18:00.624
<v Speaker 3>that's where it was going. But it's like, we just

0:18:00.624 --> 0:18:03.104
<v Speaker 3>want to sing about espresso and not feminism at the moment.

0:18:03.744 --> 0:18:05.744
<v Speaker 3>Whether that's right or wrong, it's just where we're at.

0:18:06.144 --> 0:18:08.344
<v Speaker 5>So the piece I read in today's episode, all the

0:18:08.424 --> 0:18:10.864
<v Speaker 5>hidden messages in Katy Perry's music video. We will link

0:18:10.904 --> 0:18:12.824
<v Speaker 5>that in the show notes. It's so funny. Go check

0:18:12.864 --> 0:18:15.024
<v Speaker 5>that out. Thank you so much for listening to The

0:18:15.024 --> 0:18:18.504
<v Speaker 5>Spill today. If you want something different, Claire Stevens has

0:18:18.544 --> 0:18:21.104
<v Speaker 5>interviewed Rob Mills for her podcast, But are you happy

0:18:21.144 --> 0:18:23.424
<v Speaker 5>they had such a brilliant conversation. We will link that

0:18:23.464 --> 0:18:25.784
<v Speaker 5>episode in our show notes. We will see you back

0:18:25.824 --> 0:18:27.904
<v Speaker 5>here in your podcast feed at three pm tomorrow.

0:18:27.944 --> 0:18:34.424
<v Speaker 1>Bye bye,