WEBVTT - How To Stop Overthinking What People Think Of You

0:00:00.240 --> 0:00:03.520
<v Speaker 1>Your brain con differentiate if it's a social threat or

0:00:03.560 --> 0:00:06.000
<v Speaker 1>whether a tiger walks into this room right now. Our

0:00:06.080 --> 0:00:09.520
<v Speaker 1>body reacts the same way. So it's actually so crazy

0:00:09.560 --> 0:00:13.680
<v Speaker 1>how you have that feeling physically nauseous, you know, that

0:00:13.720 --> 0:00:16.479
<v Speaker 1>fight flight response of kind of for some people that

0:00:16.600 --> 0:00:21.440
<v Speaker 1>might be nauseous, heart racing, breathing changing. Because we detect

0:00:21.520 --> 0:00:23.800
<v Speaker 1>social threats in the same way as we would any

0:00:23.840 --> 0:00:27.240
<v Speaker 1>other physical threat, so it is a very emotional and

0:00:27.280 --> 0:00:28.280
<v Speaker 1>physical response.

0:00:33.880 --> 0:00:36.239
<v Speaker 2>Hi, I'm a shiny dante and this is but are

0:00:36.280 --> 0:00:40.800
<v Speaker 2>you happy? No one likes criticism. It stings, it bruises

0:00:40.800 --> 0:00:44.839
<v Speaker 2>the ego, and emotionally, it can hit harder than we expect.

0:00:45.640 --> 0:00:49.280
<v Speaker 2>But there's a difference between feeling impacted and taking these

0:00:49.320 --> 0:00:53.320
<v Speaker 2>deeply personal because at a certain point, it's not just

0:00:53.400 --> 0:00:57.080
<v Speaker 2>the big moments. It's the slightly offton in an email,

0:00:57.560 --> 0:01:00.440
<v Speaker 2>the way someone brushes past you on the train, a

0:01:00.520 --> 0:01:04.759
<v Speaker 2>cancel plan that suddenly feels loaded, and before you know it,

0:01:05.240 --> 0:01:09.440
<v Speaker 2>you're scanning for meaning, reading between the lines, assuming the worst.

0:01:10.360 --> 0:01:13.120
<v Speaker 2>Our brains are wide to make sense of social information,

0:01:13.840 --> 0:01:19.000
<v Speaker 2>but in that process, ambiguity often gets translated into this

0:01:19.040 --> 0:01:22.640
<v Speaker 2>is about me. So why do some of us take

0:01:22.680 --> 0:01:25.520
<v Speaker 2>things more personally than others, and when does the shift

0:01:25.520 --> 0:01:28.600
<v Speaker 2>from sensitivity into something that starts to impact how we

0:01:28.640 --> 0:01:32.360
<v Speaker 2>move through the world. In this episode, I'm joined by

0:01:32.360 --> 0:01:37.199
<v Speaker 2>Sydney based clinical psychologist Anita Shimmans. We explore how early

0:01:37.280 --> 0:01:41.280
<v Speaker 2>experiences can shape the way we respond to criticism, whether

0:01:41.319 --> 0:01:43.479
<v Speaker 2>we can take it on board in a healthy way

0:01:43.920 --> 0:01:47.200
<v Speaker 2>or whether it cuts just a little too deep, and

0:01:47.280 --> 0:01:50.480
<v Speaker 2>we talk about what helps practical tools that you can

0:01:50.520 --> 0:01:54.120
<v Speaker 2>actually use in the moment, like learning how to reframe

0:01:54.160 --> 0:01:59.200
<v Speaker 2>what's happening so it doesn't automatically become personal. Here's our conversation.

0:02:00.040 --> 0:02:03.320
<v Speaker 2>Thank you so much, Anita for joining us for another conversation.

0:02:03.800 --> 0:02:04.480
<v Speaker 3>I'm excited.

0:02:04.840 --> 0:02:08.239
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm really excited about this topic because it's one

0:02:08.280 --> 0:02:10.720
<v Speaker 2>I think again, I feel like every topic is very relatable,

0:02:10.760 --> 0:02:11.679
<v Speaker 2>but this one.

0:02:11.600 --> 0:02:14.200
<v Speaker 3>This one everyone has experienced.

0:02:14.360 --> 0:02:18.919
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, yes, So why do we take things personally?

0:02:19.000 --> 0:02:23.120
<v Speaker 3>Like what's going on in the body and the mind? Yeah? Okay,

0:02:23.280 --> 0:02:25.800
<v Speaker 3>so we've got to get it unpack this a little bit. Yeah.

0:02:25.880 --> 0:02:29.880
<v Speaker 1>So it's normal that we relate everything that happens around

0:02:29.960 --> 0:02:34.480
<v Speaker 1>us back to how it concerns ourselves. So it's normal

0:02:34.480 --> 0:02:37.640
<v Speaker 1>that we kind of have this, it's got negative connotation,

0:02:37.720 --> 0:02:40.520
<v Speaker 1>but it doesn't. It doesn't really ecocentric kind of an

0:02:40.560 --> 0:02:44.760
<v Speaker 1>ecocentric kind of perspective where we relate what's happening in

0:02:44.800 --> 0:02:47.400
<v Speaker 1>the world back to how it makes sense for us.

0:02:48.480 --> 0:02:51.760
<v Speaker 1>So that's a normal default for all of us. We're

0:02:51.800 --> 0:02:56.360
<v Speaker 1>also really good at detecting any potential social threats. And

0:02:56.400 --> 0:02:59.320
<v Speaker 1>the reason why that is is because if you think,

0:02:59.600 --> 0:03:03.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, back to evolutionary history, if I am ousted

0:03:03.560 --> 0:03:07.240
<v Speaker 1>by my group, I will literally die. So I have

0:03:07.360 --> 0:03:10.919
<v Speaker 1>to be quite attuned to what's going on. Are these

0:03:10.960 --> 0:03:14.359
<v Speaker 1>guys you know, am I am I okay here? Or

0:03:14.400 --> 0:03:17.480
<v Speaker 1>are people kind of taking issue with me? So it's

0:03:17.520 --> 0:03:21.200
<v Speaker 1>better to be overly sensitive to that than miss acute

0:03:21.240 --> 0:03:24.480
<v Speaker 1>and have a really dire kind of consequence from missing it.

0:03:24.880 --> 0:03:28.320
<v Speaker 1>So we are all already naturally good to make things

0:03:28.360 --> 0:03:31.839
<v Speaker 1>about ourselves and to be really attuned to what other

0:03:31.880 --> 0:03:34.839
<v Speaker 1>people are thinking about us, and to have a more

0:03:34.880 --> 0:03:39.800
<v Speaker 1>sort of negative lens or threat lens on what others are,

0:03:40.680 --> 0:03:42.320
<v Speaker 1>what signals others are sending us.

0:03:42.520 --> 0:03:44.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's interesting you talk about the threat thing because

0:03:45.080 --> 0:03:47.240
<v Speaker 2>I think about the times when you know, my boss

0:03:47.280 --> 0:03:49.520
<v Speaker 2>might be like, hey, can we have a chat or

0:03:50.040 --> 0:03:51.280
<v Speaker 2>even just that alone.

0:03:51.480 --> 0:03:53.160
<v Speaker 3>I notice my body it.

0:03:53.080 --> 0:03:56.440
<v Speaker 2>Feels like it's threatened, it's tense, So like, can you

0:03:56.520 --> 0:03:59.840
<v Speaker 2>unpacking what's going on there? Like what's the emotional process

0:04:00.200 --> 0:04:03.200
<v Speaker 2>from a mind perspective, but also like what we're feeling.

0:04:03.360 --> 0:04:06.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, it's so good because it's actually your brain

0:04:06.680 --> 0:04:09.880
<v Speaker 1>con differentiate if it's a social threat or whether a

0:04:09.920 --> 0:04:13.520
<v Speaker 1>tiger walks into this room right now. Our body reacts

0:04:13.560 --> 0:04:18.120
<v Speaker 1>the same way. So it's actually so crazy. How you

0:04:18.160 --> 0:04:22.720
<v Speaker 1>know you have that feeling physically nauseous, you know that

0:04:22.760 --> 0:04:25.520
<v Speaker 1>fight flight response of kind of for some people that

0:04:25.640 --> 0:04:32.320
<v Speaker 1>might be nauseous, heart rate racing, you're breathing changing, because

0:04:32.360 --> 0:04:35.120
<v Speaker 1>we detect social threats in the same way as we

0:04:35.120 --> 0:04:37.920
<v Speaker 1>would any other physical threat. So it is a very

0:04:38.200 --> 0:04:40.040
<v Speaker 1>emotional and physical response.

0:04:40.240 --> 0:04:42.080
<v Speaker 3>Wow, that makes so much more sense.

0:04:42.400 --> 0:04:44.400
<v Speaker 2>So it's like when I'm seeing my boss being like

0:04:44.440 --> 0:04:46.800
<v Speaker 2>can we talk, I'm thinking a line's about to come

0:04:46.800 --> 0:04:47.160
<v Speaker 2>and eat me?

0:04:47.800 --> 0:04:51.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, like literally totally, yeah, exactly exactly. But you can

0:04:51.440 --> 0:04:53.640
<v Speaker 1>see how and this is such a cool thing to unpack.

0:04:53.680 --> 0:04:57.760
<v Speaker 1>Actually a good example because statement is so neutral, but

0:04:57.880 --> 0:05:00.880
<v Speaker 1>we've played so much meaning and it happens in a

0:05:00.920 --> 0:05:04.599
<v Speaker 1>split second, right so you have that immediate emotional response,

0:05:05.000 --> 0:05:08.120
<v Speaker 1>But what's happened between what was said and your response

0:05:08.400 --> 0:05:11.200
<v Speaker 1>is kind of that interpretation of what meaning you laid

0:05:11.240 --> 0:05:13.479
<v Speaker 1>on that, And I assume it's something like I'm in

0:05:13.520 --> 0:05:15.239
<v Speaker 1>trouble or I've done something wrong.

0:05:15.480 --> 0:05:16.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, definitely.

0:05:17.240 --> 0:05:20.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, there's so many layers to it, Like what do

0:05:20.279 --> 0:05:23.760
<v Speaker 2>you find are the most common situations where people do

0:05:23.800 --> 0:05:24.839
<v Speaker 2>take things personally.

0:05:26.520 --> 0:05:30.880
<v Speaker 1>We take things personally in areas that we have closely

0:05:30.960 --> 0:05:34.560
<v Speaker 1>tied to our sense of self worth and identity. So

0:05:34.800 --> 0:05:38.039
<v Speaker 1>if I am a career person, I'm probably going to

0:05:38.080 --> 0:05:41.920
<v Speaker 1>be more sensitive to any cues that I'm not doing

0:05:41.920 --> 0:05:46.000
<v Speaker 1>the right thing work wise than somebody who's actually, like

0:05:46.080 --> 0:05:48.280
<v Speaker 1>I work to live, not live to work, I don't

0:05:48.279 --> 0:05:50.520
<v Speaker 1>really care so much, they might be a lot less

0:05:50.520 --> 0:05:54.240
<v Speaker 1>prone to take things personally in that space. So we

0:05:54.279 --> 0:05:55.960
<v Speaker 1>take things personally where we care most.

0:05:56.200 --> 0:05:58.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's so true, because I'm thinking about the times

0:05:58.640 --> 0:06:01.040
<v Speaker 2>where I would take things personally, Like, definitely, work has

0:06:01.080 --> 0:06:03.919
<v Speaker 2>work so important for me, But then also the people

0:06:03.920 --> 0:06:06.039
<v Speaker 2>I really care about, you know, like if you're my

0:06:06.120 --> 0:06:08.359
<v Speaker 2>husband's like, hey, can we have a chat, I'm like,

0:06:09.120 --> 0:06:11.880
<v Speaker 2>oh no, Like it's different because it's not it doesn't

0:06:11.920 --> 0:06:15.160
<v Speaker 2>activate threat. It's just more like concern being like.

0:06:15.080 --> 0:06:17.440
<v Speaker 3>Oh shit, like god, I do you know?

0:06:17.680 --> 0:06:20.159
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And probably most of us can relate to the

0:06:20.200 --> 0:06:24.440
<v Speaker 1>relationship side because we're really you know, geared as humans

0:06:24.440 --> 0:06:27.880
<v Speaker 1>to care a lot about relationships, and so the people

0:06:27.920 --> 0:06:30.800
<v Speaker 1>that are closest to us have a lot to do

0:06:30.880 --> 0:06:33.360
<v Speaker 1>with our sense of identity and safety, and so we

0:06:33.440 --> 0:06:35.640
<v Speaker 1>do tend to care about what people that we know

0:06:36.000 --> 0:06:39.400
<v Speaker 1>say about us more than you know, some random stranger

0:06:39.440 --> 0:06:39.880
<v Speaker 1>on the street.

0:06:40.200 --> 0:06:43.039
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, definitely the trolls out there. Yeah, the trolls.

0:06:43.080 --> 0:06:45.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but even that's super hard to yeah, super hard

0:06:45.920 --> 0:06:47.799
<v Speaker 1>not to take a personal totally totally.

0:06:47.800 --> 0:06:49.720
<v Speaker 3>We are human after all, right.

0:06:49.560 --> 0:06:54.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, exactly, and our brain's evolved in a place where

0:06:54.360 --> 0:06:56.800
<v Speaker 1>there was no social media, and you know, you might

0:06:56.839 --> 0:07:00.440
<v Speaker 1>have had at best fifty one hundred people could have

0:07:00.480 --> 0:07:03.320
<v Speaker 1>an opinion about you, and so you have to be

0:07:03.360 --> 0:07:06.800
<v Speaker 1>sensitive because all of those really mattered. But now, you know,

0:07:06.839 --> 0:07:10.760
<v Speaker 1>if you've got a million eyes on you, literally, it

0:07:10.880 --> 0:07:14.840
<v Speaker 1>becomes overwhelming to have those say that same brain that

0:07:14.880 --> 0:07:16.280
<v Speaker 1>cares about every single comment.

0:07:16.480 --> 0:07:18.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's so true, so true.

0:07:19.080 --> 0:07:22.480
<v Speaker 2>And it's interesting too, because something I'm curious about is,

0:07:22.840 --> 0:07:25.480
<v Speaker 2>you know, I can imagine there's no clinical diagnosis to

0:07:25.680 --> 0:07:28.360
<v Speaker 2>taking things personally, right, but I can imagine that it

0:07:28.440 --> 0:07:31.560
<v Speaker 2>might be a feature for other mental health conditions as well.

0:07:31.680 --> 0:07:34.680
<v Speaker 1>Or yeah, yeah, so as you say, like in and

0:07:34.680 --> 0:07:37.480
<v Speaker 1>of itself, it's a really natural and human thing to do.

0:07:37.720 --> 0:07:41.480
<v Speaker 1>And then where does it kind of tap into go

0:07:41.560 --> 0:07:44.440
<v Speaker 1>from something that's really normal and common to something that's

0:07:44.560 --> 0:07:48.800
<v Speaker 1>really a bit more than that. And You're right, it

0:07:48.880 --> 0:07:51.440
<v Speaker 1>might be linked to things like depression. So if I

0:07:51.480 --> 0:07:57.680
<v Speaker 1>feel really awful and I'm scared of feeling kind of

0:07:58.880 --> 0:08:02.960
<v Speaker 1>rejection by and I have all these core beliefs that

0:08:03.000 --> 0:08:04.600
<v Speaker 1>I am actually really not good enough, and so I'm

0:08:04.640 --> 0:08:07.360
<v Speaker 1>looking through that lens, it might be linked to things

0:08:07.400 --> 0:08:11.880
<v Speaker 1>like low mood or anxiety for sure, maybe some personality

0:08:11.920 --> 0:08:15.520
<v Speaker 1>disorder stuff as well, where I'm expecting criticism or I'm

0:08:15.560 --> 0:08:19.960
<v Speaker 1>expecting lashings out or I'm also if I have a

0:08:19.960 --> 0:08:26.320
<v Speaker 1>trauma background, for instance, and I am I'm expecting people

0:08:26.400 --> 0:08:30.160
<v Speaker 1>not to mean well by me, and that this threat

0:08:30.360 --> 0:08:33.720
<v Speaker 1>in other people that might make me more likely to

0:08:33.920 --> 0:08:35.520
<v Speaker 1>take things personally as well.

0:08:35.760 --> 0:08:38.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, there's a lot of different factors that So

0:08:38.960 --> 0:08:41.480
<v Speaker 2>how does our childhood pass.

0:08:41.760 --> 0:08:42.400
<v Speaker 3>I'm not trying to go.

0:08:43.000 --> 0:08:46.200
<v Speaker 2>So how does our childhood or past trauma and personality

0:08:46.320 --> 0:08:47.320
<v Speaker 2>play into all of this?

0:08:48.640 --> 0:08:51.800
<v Speaker 1>Again, such a cool nature nurture question. Yes, really, Yeah,

0:08:51.840 --> 0:08:55.480
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting to unpack. So I would say from the

0:08:55.559 --> 0:08:57.880
<v Speaker 1>nature side, we might be born with a bit more

0:08:57.880 --> 0:09:02.439
<v Speaker 1>of a sensitive imperman and we might be so we

0:09:02.559 --> 0:09:05.360
<v Speaker 1>might be much more attuned to what's going on around us.

0:09:05.600 --> 0:09:07.440
<v Speaker 1>That can be a really positive thing, but also in

0:09:07.480 --> 0:09:11.080
<v Speaker 1>this case might go too far. But that might be

0:09:11.160 --> 0:09:14.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of from a personality standpoint, what we bring to

0:09:14.200 --> 0:09:17.120
<v Speaker 1>the table. And then there's a lot that happens in

0:09:17.160 --> 0:09:20.240
<v Speaker 1>our early environment that may make us more prone to

0:09:20.320 --> 0:09:24.360
<v Speaker 1>take things personally. So if we're talking about an attachment,

0:09:24.559 --> 0:09:29.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of from an attachment perspective, if my parents are

0:09:29.320 --> 0:09:34.200
<v Speaker 1>really unpredictable, sometimes they're really warm, sometimes they're not, sometimes

0:09:34.240 --> 0:09:37.040
<v Speaker 1>it's just not there, I'm going to become very attuned

0:09:37.120 --> 0:09:41.240
<v Speaker 1>to picking up on tiny little cues because it's become

0:09:41.360 --> 0:09:46.240
<v Speaker 1>really an important strategy for me not to miss opportunities

0:09:46.240 --> 0:09:50.640
<v Speaker 1>to connect. And so yeah, if you've got an anxious attachment,

0:09:50.679 --> 0:09:54.559
<v Speaker 1>I might be very rejection sensitive and be looking out

0:09:54.600 --> 0:09:57.920
<v Speaker 1>for those cues and much more sensitive to them compared

0:09:57.920 --> 0:10:01.440
<v Speaker 1>to someone who doesn't have that anxious attachment. I've got

0:10:01.440 --> 0:10:04.600
<v Speaker 1>a more avoidant attachment. So if I'm used to people

0:10:04.679 --> 0:10:07.040
<v Speaker 1>can't be relied on and I have to find for myself,

0:10:07.880 --> 0:10:10.640
<v Speaker 1>I might just have a lot more of a defensive

0:10:10.840 --> 0:10:14.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of, you know, keep you at bay kind of

0:10:14.120 --> 0:10:17.520
<v Speaker 1>mindset and expect that everything you have to say to

0:10:17.559 --> 0:10:22.360
<v Speaker 1>me or do towards me is somehow doesn't have the

0:10:22.360 --> 0:10:26.600
<v Speaker 1>best intentions. That will impact that as well.

0:10:26.800 --> 0:10:29.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's interesting because as you're like talking it out,

0:10:29.720 --> 0:10:32.600
<v Speaker 2>I'm thinking, I'm like, wow, that's so exhausting. Like, no

0:10:32.640 --> 0:10:35.720
<v Speaker 2>matter what you fall into in terms of those attachment types,

0:10:35.760 --> 0:10:38.040
<v Speaker 2>I'm like, wow, just to have that constantly in the

0:10:38.080 --> 0:10:39.680
<v Speaker 2>back of your mind is a lot.

0:10:40.160 --> 0:10:43.640
<v Speaker 1>It is, Yeah, And it's just it's so automatic as well.

0:10:43.679 --> 0:10:47.680
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, it's exhausting when you perceive the world through

0:10:47.880 --> 0:10:51.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of a threat lens and it takes a toll.

0:10:51.200 --> 0:10:53.520
<v Speaker 2>Do you feel like there's any gender differences when it

0:10:53.559 --> 0:10:55.000
<v Speaker 2>comes to taking things personally.

0:10:55.920 --> 0:10:59.679
<v Speaker 1>It's a great question. I would say there's no kind

0:10:59.720 --> 0:11:03.000
<v Speaker 1>of gender that's more likely to take things personally. I

0:11:03.000 --> 0:11:05.920
<v Speaker 1>think it's the environment growing up more so that might

0:11:05.960 --> 0:11:09.200
<v Speaker 1>make you a little bit more prone to taking things personally.

0:11:09.640 --> 0:11:10.559
<v Speaker 3>But I do think it.

0:11:10.520 --> 0:11:14.920
<v Speaker 1>Might play out differently for men and women. So, like

0:11:15.000 --> 0:11:17.800
<v Speaker 1>we said before, we take things personally in areas where

0:11:17.800 --> 0:11:21.320
<v Speaker 1>we care most about. So perhaps for a woman that

0:11:21.400 --> 0:11:26.199
<v Speaker 1>might be you know, traditionally we might have had these

0:11:26.200 --> 0:11:31.520
<v Speaker 1>societal expectations that women don't show anger or aren't too

0:11:31.600 --> 0:11:35.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of forward, and so maybe any ambiguous comments that

0:11:36.000 --> 0:11:41.280
<v Speaker 1>might show that you've somehow violated those expectations you might

0:11:41.320 --> 0:11:44.199
<v Speaker 1>be much more sensitive to than a guy, where that's

0:11:44.559 --> 0:11:47.560
<v Speaker 1>much more acceptable. Whereas maybe for men, they have different

0:11:47.600 --> 0:11:51.079
<v Speaker 1>societal expectations placed on them not to be too vulnerable

0:11:51.320 --> 0:11:55.560
<v Speaker 1>or too sensitive, and so any comments that might imply

0:11:55.720 --> 0:11:58.800
<v Speaker 1>that at all might be taken up much more personally

0:11:58.960 --> 0:12:00.959
<v Speaker 1>than for a woman the comments wouldn't.

0:12:01.480 --> 0:12:04.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's amazing just how like those external factors can

0:12:04.320 --> 0:12:07.360
<v Speaker 2>really drive how we show up internally as well.

0:12:07.480 --> 0:12:11.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, exactly, I think, you know, it's even doubt

0:12:11.160 --> 0:12:12.800
<v Speaker 1>a little bit now, but I would say, you know,

0:12:13.520 --> 0:12:16.640
<v Speaker 1>historically it might have been that there was a more

0:12:16.840 --> 0:12:20.880
<v Speaker 1>gendered element to it, where yeah, women were kind of

0:12:20.880 --> 0:12:24.160
<v Speaker 1>placed in a very particular it was a very small

0:12:24.240 --> 0:12:25.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of box that we were allowed to be in,

0:12:26.320 --> 0:12:29.679
<v Speaker 1>and Sony, any signals that we might be stepping outside

0:12:29.720 --> 0:12:32.480
<v Speaker 1>of that very rigid box would be a threat, and

0:12:32.480 --> 0:12:35.200
<v Speaker 1>therefore we might have been much more attuned to picking

0:12:35.280 --> 0:12:37.200
<v Speaker 1>up on any potential trespasses.

0:12:37.520 --> 0:12:40.160
<v Speaker 2>So does being a part of a culture that values,

0:12:40.640 --> 0:12:43.560
<v Speaker 2>you know, emotional toughness, Like, does that make it harder

0:12:43.600 --> 0:12:46.120
<v Speaker 2>to express when something has hurt you?

0:12:47.000 --> 0:12:51.000
<v Speaker 1>Likely it's still happening, but it's just suppressed because you

0:12:51.080 --> 0:12:54.960
<v Speaker 1>can't express how something has impacted you because then you

0:12:55.040 --> 0:12:58.560
<v Speaker 1>might be you know, yeah, it kind of goes against

0:12:58.600 --> 0:13:02.959
<v Speaker 1>maybe so cultural, but the feeling's still there. But then

0:13:03.000 --> 0:13:06.520
<v Speaker 1>perhaps it's just not able to be communicated, y yes,

0:13:06.679 --> 0:13:10.040
<v Speaker 1>and suppressed and therefore might even take a bigger toll potentially.

0:13:10.200 --> 0:13:10.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:13:10.440 --> 0:13:13.079
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it doesn't go away entirely, it's just not doesn't

0:13:13.080 --> 0:13:13.880
<v Speaker 1>find an outlet.

0:13:14.160 --> 0:13:15.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, totally.

0:13:15.080 --> 0:13:17.560
<v Speaker 2>And it's interesting too because I think something that I've

0:13:17.600 --> 0:13:21.520
<v Speaker 2>really focused on is sometimes not having that expectation that

0:13:21.720 --> 0:13:24.840
<v Speaker 2>you know, within my culture, that you know, my parents

0:13:24.880 --> 0:13:26.520
<v Speaker 2>can be able to hear me in the way that

0:13:26.559 --> 0:13:28.959
<v Speaker 2>I want them to be heard as well, because I'm like, oh,

0:13:29.000 --> 0:13:32.080
<v Speaker 2>they don't have that capacity, they didn't have that upbringing

0:13:32.120 --> 0:13:33.560
<v Speaker 2>to be able to hold it in that way. So

0:13:33.640 --> 0:13:36.000
<v Speaker 2>I think bringing a bit of that kind of compassionate

0:13:36.080 --> 0:13:37.240
<v Speaker 2>less has really helped.

0:13:37.760 --> 0:13:38.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:13:38.120 --> 0:13:43.120
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely, Yeah, So how does social media and online communication

0:13:43.559 --> 0:13:47.080
<v Speaker 2>amplify this tendency to feel personally attacked? Like you know

0:13:47.120 --> 0:13:49.880
<v Speaker 2>when you get those you send a message on Instagram

0:13:49.920 --> 0:13:53.080
<v Speaker 2>and it's like the red receipts. You know, it's like

0:13:53.160 --> 0:13:56.120
<v Speaker 2>they've read it but they haven't responded, or to someone's

0:13:56.160 --> 0:13:59.040
<v Speaker 2>like love hearted emoji something but then can say thank you.

0:13:59.040 --> 0:14:00.719
<v Speaker 3>You know, we can spy. They're all a lot.

0:14:01.080 --> 0:14:03.600
<v Speaker 1>That's such a good point because you're missing about half

0:14:03.640 --> 0:14:05.719
<v Speaker 1>of the information that you would usually take in right.

0:14:05.800 --> 0:14:09.480
<v Speaker 1>All the nonverbal cues that will give you a clue

0:14:09.520 --> 0:14:11.560
<v Speaker 1>on whether this is something that you should be taking

0:14:11.559 --> 0:14:14.880
<v Speaker 1>personally or not go missing. So if I saw somebody

0:14:15.120 --> 0:14:17.920
<v Speaker 1>receive my text and their kids are screaming at them

0:14:17.960 --> 0:14:21.120
<v Speaker 1>at the same time, and you're resing someone's at the

0:14:21.120 --> 0:14:23.360
<v Speaker 1>front door and so they put the phone away, I

0:14:23.400 --> 0:14:26.280
<v Speaker 1>would know that there's all these contextual factors that make

0:14:26.320 --> 0:14:27.920
<v Speaker 1>them not be able to respond right now. But if

0:14:27.920 --> 0:14:30.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm missing all of that, I might be there sitting

0:14:31.120 --> 0:14:33.120
<v Speaker 1>right well, I know exactly what happened here, and that's

0:14:33.160 --> 0:14:35.080
<v Speaker 1>because you know she's actually mad at me and that's

0:14:35.080 --> 0:14:36.080
<v Speaker 1>why she's not replying.

0:14:36.360 --> 0:14:38.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. Same with comments.

0:14:38.920 --> 0:14:40.720
<v Speaker 1>For instance, do you see my face and I'm sort

0:14:40.720 --> 0:14:43.640
<v Speaker 1>of saying, hey, I love your pants, you might be

0:14:43.680 --> 0:14:46.400
<v Speaker 1>able to you know, even if you're prone to taking

0:14:46.440 --> 0:14:49.280
<v Speaker 1>things personally, it might really give you enough cues to oh, no,

0:14:49.360 --> 0:14:52.280
<v Speaker 1>she's authentic there, and I'll take it as a compliment.

0:14:52.560 --> 0:14:56.200
<v Speaker 1>Whereas if I comment on a picture of yours, and

0:14:56.240 --> 0:14:59.200
<v Speaker 1>you might be prone to taking things personally, expecting kind

0:14:59.240 --> 0:15:02.600
<v Speaker 1>of criticism, passive aggressive comments, and I just said nice

0:15:02.640 --> 0:15:06.720
<v Speaker 1>pants without any you know, context, you might put your

0:15:06.800 --> 0:15:10.680
<v Speaker 1>lens onto that more and then perhaps be yeah, taking

0:15:10.720 --> 0:15:12.880
<v Speaker 1>it personally when it went because you're missing all of

0:15:12.880 --> 0:15:17.160
<v Speaker 1>that other information. Yeah, And when our brains lack information,

0:15:17.320 --> 0:15:20.080
<v Speaker 1>we fill in the gap. Yeah, and we fill in

0:15:20.120 --> 0:15:21.560
<v Speaker 1>the gap in a negative way.

0:15:21.760 --> 0:15:21.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:15:22.000 --> 0:15:24.640
<v Speaker 3>Right, So that's that's what we all do.

0:15:24.880 --> 0:15:27.520
<v Speaker 1>When there's information missing, We're going to kind of jump

0:15:27.600 --> 0:15:28.600
<v Speaker 1>to worst case scenario.

0:15:28.800 --> 0:15:29.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:15:29.200 --> 0:15:31.720
<v Speaker 2>We really swim in so many assumptions and we're like, wow,

0:15:31.800 --> 0:15:33.200
<v Speaker 2>why do I feel so hurt?

0:15:33.320 --> 0:15:35.080
<v Speaker 3>Oh? I created all of this, you.

0:15:35.000 --> 0:15:37.240
<v Speaker 1>Know, yeah, and I want to like preempt it. But

0:15:38.680 --> 0:15:40.800
<v Speaker 1>it might not be all about you. Right, Well, you

0:15:40.840 --> 0:15:43.880
<v Speaker 1>have to say title in your head, it is worthwhile disentangling,

0:15:43.920 --> 0:15:45.920
<v Speaker 1>like what is what am I bringing to the table?

0:15:45.960 --> 0:15:47.960
<v Speaker 1>What am I layering on top of what was said?

0:15:48.320 --> 0:15:50.320
<v Speaker 1>And usually that is at least a big part.

0:15:50.440 --> 0:15:53.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, I think I really like the example around.

0:15:53.480 --> 0:15:55.760
<v Speaker 2>You know, we talk about the difference between digital communication

0:15:56.120 --> 0:16:00.360
<v Speaker 2>and just that face to face because nonverbal communication is

0:16:00.400 --> 0:16:03.480
<v Speaker 2>so powerful, you know, it really adds to our communication style.

0:16:03.480 --> 0:16:04.000
<v Speaker 3>So I like that.

0:16:04.040 --> 0:16:07.800
<v Speaker 2>We remember, like there's yeah, there's just so many gaps

0:16:07.800 --> 0:16:09.680
<v Speaker 2>in digital communication, which is.

0:16:09.800 --> 0:16:12.320
<v Speaker 3>And gen Z don't use emojis, so like do they not?

0:16:13.280 --> 0:16:15.480
<v Speaker 2>Is it a millennial scene? Gosh, I should know this,

0:16:17.760 --> 0:16:20.640
<v Speaker 2>but I know a lot of gen zs.

0:16:20.120 --> 0:16:22.720
<v Speaker 1>Know as a millennial, I'm like, you know, heart emogen, yeah,

0:16:23.320 --> 0:16:27.320
<v Speaker 1>communicate all but then gen Z there's just nothing. And

0:16:27.360 --> 0:16:31.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, yeah, they're too cool, too cool for school.

0:16:32.440 --> 0:16:35.000
<v Speaker 3>I was like, wow, that's even more open to interpretation.

0:16:35.320 --> 0:16:39.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the generational difference is exactly exact.

0:16:39.440 --> 0:16:43.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. More of my conversation with Anita after this break.

0:16:45.240 --> 0:16:48.920
<v Speaker 2>So how much of taking things personally is about the

0:16:48.960 --> 0:16:52.680
<v Speaker 2>fear of not being good enough versus my egos are

0:16:52.680 --> 0:16:54.560
<v Speaker 2>actually just really bruised, right, Now.

0:16:56.080 --> 0:17:01.480
<v Speaker 1>It's interesting because it's it's connected because what is ego.

0:17:01.680 --> 0:17:05.840
<v Speaker 1>It's it's it's kind of this layer, this protective layer

0:17:06.400 --> 0:17:08.960
<v Speaker 1>of never wanting, never having to kind of feel that

0:17:09.119 --> 0:17:12.040
<v Speaker 1>underlying defectiveness. So it's like an amplification, it's like an

0:17:12.040 --> 0:17:19.679
<v Speaker 1>overcompensation for feeling less than underneath. So bruised ego is

0:17:19.760 --> 0:17:23.720
<v Speaker 1>because it's touching on something that you already believe about

0:17:23.720 --> 0:17:28.359
<v Speaker 1>yourself and you don't want to face. And so you know,

0:17:29.080 --> 0:17:31.880
<v Speaker 1>often the comment might have not even been intended that way,

0:17:31.920 --> 0:17:34.920
<v Speaker 1>but your ego is bruised because there's already an internal

0:17:35.000 --> 0:17:37.440
<v Speaker 1>story about this topic that you've created.

0:17:38.240 --> 0:17:41.280
<v Speaker 2>So it's like giving more data to go within find

0:17:41.320 --> 0:17:42.080
<v Speaker 2>out what's going on.

0:17:42.400 --> 0:17:46.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, exactly, exactly, And so you know, if I have

0:17:46.400 --> 0:17:49.880
<v Speaker 1>to face that feeling of not being good enough because

0:17:49.880 --> 0:17:53.680
<v Speaker 1>of something that you said, it's incredibly painful. So breust

0:17:53.760 --> 0:17:57.760
<v Speaker 1>ego it can feel actually like the same areas of

0:17:57.760 --> 0:18:01.399
<v Speaker 1>the brain light up in that kind of pain compared

0:18:01.440 --> 0:18:04.560
<v Speaker 1>to physical pain. So again our brain is really it's

0:18:04.600 --> 0:18:08.080
<v Speaker 1>hard for our brain to differentiate different types of pain.

0:18:08.280 --> 0:18:11.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's so interesting because I know because before you

0:18:11.359 --> 0:18:14.000
<v Speaker 2>also talked about how our brain interprets seeing a line

0:18:14.119 --> 0:18:16.440
<v Speaker 2>is the same threat as you see your boss say,

0:18:16.760 --> 0:18:19.560
<v Speaker 2>can you have a chat with me? We think that

0:18:19.600 --> 0:18:22.040
<v Speaker 2>our brains are really smart, and it is, but it's

0:18:22.119 --> 0:18:24.639
<v Speaker 2>just funny because when you unpack like the details of

0:18:24.680 --> 0:18:28.399
<v Speaker 2>how our brain interprets things, it makes me wonder. I'm like, oh, wow, Okay,

0:18:29.119 --> 0:18:31.800
<v Speaker 2>maybe I'm giving my brain too much about like there's

0:18:31.840 --> 0:18:32.159
<v Speaker 2>still a.

0:18:32.240 --> 0:18:33.720
<v Speaker 3>Lot to learn and change.

0:18:33.760 --> 0:18:36.160
<v Speaker 1>Totally, it would be cool if it could differentiate actual

0:18:36.200 --> 0:18:39.880
<v Speaker 1>from perceived threat so that, yeah, you wouldn't have to yeah,

0:18:40.080 --> 0:18:42.280
<v Speaker 1>be so alarmed all the time, will but also.

0:18:42.119 --> 0:18:44.480
<v Speaker 3>Hurt all the time. Yeah.

0:18:44.520 --> 0:18:47.000
<v Speaker 2>A lot of what we've been talking about is, you know,

0:18:47.119 --> 0:18:50.119
<v Speaker 2>taking things personally can be seen as like a bad

0:18:50.200 --> 0:18:53.840
<v Speaker 2>thing or we can kind of villainize the term, right,

0:18:54.040 --> 0:18:56.560
<v Speaker 2>but can it be a good thing? Like is it

0:18:56.560 --> 0:18:57.880
<v Speaker 2>okay to take things personally?

0:18:57.920 --> 0:18:59.680
<v Speaker 3>Sometimes? Yeah, totally.

0:18:59.720 --> 0:19:02.600
<v Speaker 1>I think you know, when we take things personally, it's

0:19:02.680 --> 0:19:05.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of a cue signpost something's going on that's important

0:19:05.560 --> 0:19:08.960
<v Speaker 1>to me. So it gives you some information that we're talking,

0:19:09.359 --> 0:19:12.040
<v Speaker 1>we're touching on something that is of importance.

0:19:12.200 --> 0:19:13.240
<v Speaker 3>That's a really good thing.

0:19:15.200 --> 0:19:18.320
<v Speaker 1>It also gives you a sense of have my boundaries

0:19:18.320 --> 0:19:21.480
<v Speaker 1>been crossed or have my values been.

0:19:23.440 --> 0:19:28.320
<v Speaker 3>Has it been a sort of an a violation of

0:19:28.640 --> 0:19:29.280
<v Speaker 3>my values?

0:19:29.440 --> 0:19:32.360
<v Speaker 1>So it does give you really important information as well,

0:19:32.440 --> 0:19:35.320
<v Speaker 1>So it's not just bad. The bad thing is is

0:19:35.440 --> 0:19:38.119
<v Speaker 1>if it takes you to a place where you know

0:19:38.480 --> 0:19:41.120
<v Speaker 1>it makes going through life really hard because you're sort

0:19:41.119 --> 0:19:45.000
<v Speaker 1>of expecting and seeing threat at every corner. But butterfault

0:19:45.119 --> 0:19:48.320
<v Speaker 1>is not necessarily something bad, and sometimes you will find

0:19:48.359 --> 0:19:52.639
<v Speaker 1>that actually, even once you've done all the thought exercises

0:19:52.640 --> 0:19:55.920
<v Speaker 1>that we might talk about in a bit, that what's

0:19:56.200 --> 0:19:58.199
<v Speaker 1>left at the end is actually something that you need

0:19:58.240 --> 0:20:00.639
<v Speaker 1>to address with the other person. I think that is

0:20:00.720 --> 0:20:03.679
<v Speaker 1>genuinely important to pay attention to.

0:20:04.119 --> 0:20:06.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's so true. It's good.

0:20:06.200 --> 0:20:07.639
<v Speaker 2>I think it's really great we shine a light on

0:20:07.680 --> 0:20:10.399
<v Speaker 2>that because I think also, you know, we are human,

0:20:10.560 --> 0:20:12.560
<v Speaker 2>like I think, you know, when we feel like our

0:20:12.600 --> 0:20:15.439
<v Speaker 2>boundaries across or we are taking things personally like I

0:20:15.480 --> 0:20:18.160
<v Speaker 2>do see it as a sign of self respect, being like, okay,

0:20:18.280 --> 0:20:21.800
<v Speaker 2>this is really interesting, what about this? Because sometimes I think,

0:20:22.119 --> 0:20:24.800
<v Speaker 2>if you've been a people pleaser a long time, I'm

0:20:24.840 --> 0:20:28.159
<v Speaker 2>talking about myself, it's like you always yeah, literally, you

0:20:28.200 --> 0:20:30.760
<v Speaker 2>always think that you're the one to play Oh, I'm

0:20:30.800 --> 0:20:33.560
<v Speaker 2>in the wrong. I've fucked up, so I need to

0:20:33.560 --> 0:20:36.240
<v Speaker 2>look at that. Whereas to even come to a place

0:20:36.280 --> 0:20:38.680
<v Speaker 2>where you're like, oh, actually that wasn't.

0:20:38.480 --> 0:20:40.479
<v Speaker 3>Okay, it's really big.

0:20:40.720 --> 0:20:42.480
<v Speaker 1>That's a really good point of seanny, because I was

0:20:42.520 --> 0:20:44.879
<v Speaker 1>coming at it from more like, if you're prone to

0:20:44.920 --> 0:20:47.760
<v Speaker 1>always take things personally, can it still be a good thing?

0:20:47.760 --> 0:20:50.719
<v Speaker 1>But you're right, if you're prone to always internalize and

0:20:50.800 --> 0:20:53.879
<v Speaker 1>find fault within rather than find fault in others, then

0:20:53.920 --> 0:20:57.080
<v Speaker 1>it can actually be a really empowering thing to take

0:20:57.119 --> 0:20:59.080
<v Speaker 1>that as a cue that there is something that needs

0:20:59.080 --> 0:21:01.920
<v Speaker 1>to be addressed here and you need to respect those boundaries.

0:21:02.600 --> 0:21:03.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, totally.

0:21:03.640 --> 0:21:06.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I find when it comes to taking things personally,

0:21:06.840 --> 0:21:09.439
<v Speaker 2>there is there's a nuance to it, right, So like,

0:21:09.520 --> 0:21:12.440
<v Speaker 2>how do you balance like, I'm allowed to feel hurt

0:21:12.560 --> 0:21:15.880
<v Speaker 2>with Okay, I'm probably feeling this a bit too deeply now.

0:21:16.760 --> 0:21:20.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think first of all, just validate that it's

0:21:20.520 --> 0:21:23.000
<v Speaker 1>normal to have bigger reactions to things that happen, so

0:21:23.320 --> 0:21:25.960
<v Speaker 1>you're not weird for having a big reaction, and don't

0:21:26.280 --> 0:21:28.400
<v Speaker 1>layer criticism on top because it's.

0:21:28.280 --> 0:21:30.159
<v Speaker 3>Already enough to deal with the initial reaction.

0:21:31.200 --> 0:21:33.240
<v Speaker 1>Then I would say, if you can give yourself a

0:21:33.280 --> 0:21:36.120
<v Speaker 1>little bit of a pause, and like you said before,

0:21:36.200 --> 0:21:39.240
<v Speaker 1>sometimes our whole body is activated. So can we try

0:21:39.280 --> 0:21:43.359
<v Speaker 1>and downregulate how intense we're feeling this in our body

0:21:43.400 --> 0:21:46.080
<v Speaker 1>as well? And then can I give myself a little

0:21:46.080 --> 0:21:50.719
<v Speaker 1>bit of an opportunity to disentangle what actually happened and

0:21:50.760 --> 0:21:53.520
<v Speaker 1>how much did I layer on top of it and

0:21:53.560 --> 0:21:55.560
<v Speaker 1>the parts that I've layered on top of it. Can

0:21:55.640 --> 0:21:59.440
<v Speaker 1>I give myself a lot of self compassion and take

0:21:59.480 --> 0:22:01.840
<v Speaker 1>that layer of way, and then what's left do I

0:22:01.880 --> 0:22:03.600
<v Speaker 1>need to address that? And then I can come at

0:22:03.600 --> 0:22:06.959
<v Speaker 1>it from a very kind of grounded, fruitful kind of

0:22:07.160 --> 0:22:10.520
<v Speaker 1>perspective rather than you know, reacting in the moment.

0:22:10.800 --> 0:22:14.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, totally, I'm getting so many takeaways already.

0:22:14.320 --> 0:22:14.879
<v Speaker 3>This is great.

0:22:16.280 --> 0:22:18.159
<v Speaker 2>So what would you say to someone who's in the

0:22:18.200 --> 0:22:21.760
<v Speaker 2>middle of a moment right now and is really struggling

0:22:21.880 --> 0:22:23.639
<v Speaker 2>with taking something personally?

0:22:23.880 --> 0:22:26.919
<v Speaker 1>I mean, often these reactions happen really really quickly. If

0:22:27.119 --> 0:22:30.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking to someone who's actually been stewing on something

0:22:30.119 --> 0:22:32.760
<v Speaker 1>for a while, it is probably a bigger sign that

0:22:32.840 --> 0:22:36.600
<v Speaker 1>there is another element to that that's not just about them,

0:22:36.720 --> 0:22:39.240
<v Speaker 1>and it's something that actually genuinely does need to be

0:22:39.359 --> 0:22:40.440
<v Speaker 1>unpacked and addressed.

0:22:40.680 --> 0:22:41.280
<v Speaker 3>If you're in the.

0:22:41.200 --> 0:22:44.199
<v Speaker 1>Middle of kind of in your fields because somebody has

0:22:44.240 --> 0:22:46.760
<v Speaker 1>said something or didn't invite you to something, and you've

0:22:46.800 --> 0:22:51.199
<v Speaker 1>taken it personally, first I would say validate again that

0:22:51.280 --> 0:22:54.760
<v Speaker 1>this is really normal. I would then say, can we

0:22:54.880 --> 0:22:59.320
<v Speaker 1>try and just for flexibility's sake, try and bring in

0:22:59.480 --> 0:23:04.200
<v Speaker 1>other points here of your initial interpretation might be one story,

0:23:04.240 --> 0:23:06.560
<v Speaker 1>but there might be a whole lot of other ways

0:23:06.600 --> 0:23:09.280
<v Speaker 1>that this can be viewed. Can we just make do this,

0:23:09.440 --> 0:23:11.879
<v Speaker 1>go through these exercise and kind of see if we

0:23:11.920 --> 0:23:14.879
<v Speaker 1>can come up with other stories so that we're not

0:23:14.920 --> 0:23:19.480
<v Speaker 1>so married to our initial one, and then that will

0:23:19.520 --> 0:23:23.760
<v Speaker 1>help us to disentangle a little bit more what I've

0:23:23.800 --> 0:23:27.000
<v Speaker 1>brought to the table on top and what has what

0:23:27.119 --> 0:23:30.639
<v Speaker 1>is truly actually a violation of my boundaries or something

0:23:30.640 --> 0:23:32.560
<v Speaker 1>that really hurt me that I do need to address,

0:23:33.080 --> 0:23:35.800
<v Speaker 1>and then go ahead and address it, and we can

0:23:35.920 --> 0:23:38.480
<v Speaker 1>talk about, you know, good ways to kind of communicate

0:23:38.520 --> 0:23:42.159
<v Speaker 1>that in a little bit. But yeah, feel free to

0:23:42.200 --> 0:23:44.720
<v Speaker 1>then say, this has been sticking with me for a

0:23:44.760 --> 0:23:48.080
<v Speaker 1>long time. I've now figured out, Okay, there are things

0:23:48.119 --> 0:23:51.159
<v Speaker 1>I've put on top, and nonetheless there's stuff that I

0:23:51.200 --> 0:23:52.040
<v Speaker 1>need to address here.

0:23:53.119 --> 0:23:55.200
<v Speaker 2>Well, yeah, I mean we can jump into it now

0:23:55.280 --> 0:23:57.800
<v Speaker 2>because I'm curious to know, like if someone is sitting

0:23:57.800 --> 0:24:00.840
<v Speaker 2>with oh, actually I do need to have a conversation, Yeah,

0:24:00.840 --> 0:24:01.160
<v Speaker 2>like what.

0:24:01.160 --> 0:24:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Would you advise? Imagine like a continuum and we can

0:24:05.440 --> 0:24:07.760
<v Speaker 1>either be on one side, which is sort of what

0:24:07.800 --> 0:24:11.639
<v Speaker 1>we call passive communication, where you're not saying what you

0:24:11.720 --> 0:24:13.840
<v Speaker 1>need or what you're feeling and you're only kind of

0:24:14.160 --> 0:24:18.000
<v Speaker 1>taking into consideration the other person's needs, and then on

0:24:18.040 --> 0:24:21.080
<v Speaker 1>the very opposite side, it's sort of aggressive communication, where

0:24:21.080 --> 0:24:23.320
<v Speaker 1>you just barge in, this is what I'm feeling and

0:24:23.359 --> 0:24:25.160
<v Speaker 1>this is what I need, and I don't care about

0:24:25.160 --> 0:24:28.120
<v Speaker 1>your perspective, as you might be able to tell. Neither

0:24:28.200 --> 0:24:32.199
<v Speaker 1>of those are particularly good, yeah, for connection, for your

0:24:32.240 --> 0:24:35.320
<v Speaker 1>well being. And nicely, in the middle, we have assert

0:24:35.400 --> 0:24:39.879
<v Speaker 1>of communication. So that's where I'm honoring my needs and

0:24:39.960 --> 0:24:45.320
<v Speaker 1>feelings and I'm taking into consideration your viewpoint, and I'm

0:24:45.359 --> 0:24:48.600
<v Speaker 1>finding a way to communicate that that's most likely to

0:24:48.720 --> 0:24:53.600
<v Speaker 1>be received receivable without defensiveness on the other side, and

0:24:53.640 --> 0:24:55.600
<v Speaker 1>that is most likely to come to some sort of

0:24:55.720 --> 0:24:59.600
<v Speaker 1>constructive outcome. So sure we'll pack what a sort of

0:24:59.600 --> 0:25:04.800
<v Speaker 1>communicy Yeah, yeah, Okay, So there's lots of different ways

0:25:04.840 --> 0:25:07.320
<v Speaker 1>to kind of come at it. I like to use

0:25:07.320 --> 0:25:12.400
<v Speaker 1>a simple one, two three sort of recipe, which is one,

0:25:12.520 --> 0:25:16.159
<v Speaker 1>can we state the facts, so rather than already putting

0:25:16.200 --> 0:25:18.760
<v Speaker 1>meaning or interpretation in it, can I just repeat what

0:25:18.840 --> 0:25:22.520
<v Speaker 1>you said? So these reports need revising. You said that

0:25:22.560 --> 0:25:26.280
<v Speaker 1>to me now three times today. That's a fact.

0:25:26.359 --> 0:25:26.520
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:25:26.560 --> 0:25:29.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying you're always attacking me. I'm saying that's

0:25:29.119 --> 0:25:31.560
<v Speaker 1>what you said, so it introduces the topic in a

0:25:31.560 --> 0:25:34.399
<v Speaker 1>way that doesn't make you immediately defensive. Then I'm going

0:25:34.440 --> 0:25:36.840
<v Speaker 1>to say how that impacts me. So that's the second step.

0:25:36.880 --> 0:25:40.320
<v Speaker 1>So instead of talking about your intention or what you did,

0:25:41.040 --> 0:25:43.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to say about how that impacted me. When

0:25:43.480 --> 0:25:46.119
<v Speaker 1>you said that three times in a row, I felt

0:25:46.119 --> 0:25:49.960
<v Speaker 1>myself kind of feel a little bit anxious because I

0:25:50.000 --> 0:25:52.680
<v Speaker 1>felt that maybe I wasn't doing a good enough job.

0:25:53.480 --> 0:25:55.520
<v Speaker 1>And then three, this is often what we leave out

0:25:55.640 --> 0:25:57.760
<v Speaker 1>is what can I ask of the other person to

0:25:57.880 --> 0:26:00.639
<v Speaker 1>rectify it? Can I give them a suggestion. I'm not

0:26:00.680 --> 0:26:02.439
<v Speaker 1>going to let you guess how to better approach this

0:26:02.560 --> 0:26:04.760
<v Speaker 1>with me. I'm going to actually give you a path

0:26:05.200 --> 0:26:08.440
<v Speaker 1>so you know in future I would really appreciate. Maybe

0:26:08.440 --> 0:26:10.520
<v Speaker 1>we can have like a little check in once in

0:26:10.560 --> 0:26:12.920
<v Speaker 1>the day where we can talk about what needs doing,

0:26:13.200 --> 0:26:16.480
<v Speaker 1>so that I'm I'm aware that that's the half hour

0:26:16.520 --> 0:26:18.640
<v Speaker 1>where we can talk about that, but I'm not constantly

0:26:18.720 --> 0:26:21.239
<v Speaker 1>kind of expecting, you know, more comments that I can

0:26:21.480 --> 0:26:23.680
<v Speaker 1>then take the wrong way. Do you think that would

0:26:23.720 --> 0:26:25.240
<v Speaker 1>be okay? Can we do it this way?

0:26:26.200 --> 0:26:30.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? I love that. Yeah, that is so effective.

0:26:30.520 --> 0:26:33.639
<v Speaker 1>Which is very different from you know, right, I'm going

0:26:33.720 --> 0:26:37.000
<v Speaker 1>to suppress because I'm really hope you know, you've given

0:26:37.000 --> 0:26:38.439
<v Speaker 1>me the feeling though I'm not doing the right thing,

0:26:38.480 --> 0:26:41.359
<v Speaker 1>but you know, I'm withdrawing or angry, but I'm not

0:26:41.400 --> 0:26:44.600
<v Speaker 1>going to say anything I'm really heard or I'm going

0:26:44.640 --> 0:26:45.399
<v Speaker 1>to lash out at you and.

0:26:45.400 --> 0:26:47.240
<v Speaker 3>Say, can you stop saying that for a second, Like,

0:26:47.400 --> 0:26:49.879
<v Speaker 3>you know, it's very different. Yeah.

0:26:49.920 --> 0:26:52.920
<v Speaker 2>So let's say like that conversation happens, right, and then

0:26:53.960 --> 0:26:57.040
<v Speaker 2>the person on the other side who gave that initial

0:26:57.080 --> 0:27:00.720
<v Speaker 2>criticism host if they don't take that well, they take

0:27:00.760 --> 0:27:01.840
<v Speaker 2>it personally.

0:27:01.440 --> 0:27:03.720
<v Speaker 3>You know, and then we're in this kind of right.

0:27:04.119 --> 0:27:07.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, you run a risk when you bring

0:27:08.000 --> 0:27:10.760
<v Speaker 1>up a need in an emotion that the other person

0:27:10.840 --> 0:27:14.359
<v Speaker 1>then can't take it on from from the perspective that

0:27:14.400 --> 0:27:18.760
<v Speaker 1>you're trying to communicate it. You can obviously help communicate that.

0:27:18.880 --> 0:27:21.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, I understand that wasn't your intention at all,

0:27:21.320 --> 0:27:24.119
<v Speaker 1>but this is how it landed for me, And you know,

0:27:24.480 --> 0:27:27.320
<v Speaker 1>because of how I operate, like, I know that this

0:27:27.400 --> 0:27:30.119
<v Speaker 1>other this other way would really help me not to

0:27:30.920 --> 0:27:32.840
<v Speaker 1>It gives you the best It gives the other person

0:27:32.840 --> 0:27:36.159
<v Speaker 1>the best chance not to take it too personally themselves.

0:27:36.440 --> 0:27:40.600
<v Speaker 1>So a sort of communication helps with yourself how your needs,

0:27:40.720 --> 0:27:42.240
<v Speaker 1>but also respecting the other.

0:27:42.119 --> 0:27:46.520
<v Speaker 2>Person's feelings totally. That's a good point. Yeah, that's really good. Okay,

0:27:46.520 --> 0:27:48.560
<v Speaker 2>So I'm curious because I kind of want to flip

0:27:48.600 --> 0:27:51.240
<v Speaker 2>it now in a sense of the person that needs

0:27:51.280 --> 0:27:55.440
<v Speaker 2>to give the criticism or the constructive feedback, how can

0:27:55.480 --> 0:27:58.920
<v Speaker 2>they give that in a way of not dismiss being

0:27:59.000 --> 0:28:00.359
<v Speaker 2>like coming across as this missive.

0:28:00.440 --> 0:28:01.080
<v Speaker 3>Do you know what I mean?

0:28:01.640 --> 0:28:04.320
<v Speaker 2>Would they kind of follow that same format or is

0:28:04.359 --> 0:28:05.000
<v Speaker 2>it different?

0:28:05.560 --> 0:28:05.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

0:28:05.840 --> 0:28:07.480
<v Speaker 1>So I think a set of communication is a great

0:28:07.520 --> 0:28:10.600
<v Speaker 1>tool to communicate anything that's a bit tricky. Yeah, Okay,

0:28:11.200 --> 0:28:14.160
<v Speaker 1>I think keep it specific to the situation. So don't

0:28:14.200 --> 0:28:17.199
<v Speaker 1>make globalizing statements, because if I'm going to say you

0:28:17.320 --> 0:28:21.680
<v Speaker 1>always or you never it's really hard not to take

0:28:21.680 --> 0:28:24.119
<v Speaker 1>that personally because I'm kind of attacking your whole character

0:28:24.280 --> 0:28:26.480
<v Speaker 1>or you know, so I'm going to try and make

0:28:26.520 --> 0:28:29.919
<v Speaker 1>it very specific in this particular situation. When you said X,

0:28:30.119 --> 0:28:34.040
<v Speaker 1>it made me feel why and I would really appreciate ze.

0:28:34.359 --> 0:28:34.520
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:28:34.920 --> 0:28:38.240
<v Speaker 1>That's different to saying you just are such a disrespectful

0:28:38.280 --> 0:28:41.400
<v Speaker 1>person in general, or yeah, don't make it about it

0:28:41.680 --> 0:28:42.840
<v Speaker 1>about the person as a whole.

0:28:43.040 --> 0:28:45.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, it sounds like and I really like that

0:28:45.320 --> 0:28:49.080
<v Speaker 2>first step around when you state the facts, keeping it neutral,

0:28:49.200 --> 0:28:53.920
<v Speaker 2>like keeping the emotions out just makes it sound really clean, exactly.

0:28:54.120 --> 0:28:54.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:28:54.680 --> 0:28:57.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and it's sort of undernoable. Yeah, that is exactly

0:28:57.120 --> 0:28:58.840
<v Speaker 1>what happened. If you had a camera in the room,

0:28:59.360 --> 0:29:02.400
<v Speaker 1>nobody could that that was how it played out, was

0:29:02.440 --> 0:29:04.760
<v Speaker 1>there's not a layer of interpretation on it already.

0:29:05.440 --> 0:29:09.040
<v Speaker 2>More of my conversation with Anita after this break for

0:29:09.160 --> 0:29:12.160
<v Speaker 2>someone that might be struggling with being able to separate

0:29:12.320 --> 0:29:16.440
<v Speaker 2>the facts to the narrative they're attaching, like, do you

0:29:16.480 --> 0:29:18.840
<v Speaker 2>have any like concrete tools that they can use to

0:29:18.880 --> 0:29:21.000
<v Speaker 2>be able to really separate that out or like things

0:29:21.040 --> 0:29:22.000
<v Speaker 2>that you do in the clinic.

0:29:22.640 --> 0:29:25.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So again, I would like to come at it

0:29:25.560 --> 0:29:28.120
<v Speaker 1>from kind of two layers, because you know, if we

0:29:28.160 --> 0:29:31.760
<v Speaker 1>are very prone to taking things personally and expecting criticism,

0:29:31.960 --> 0:29:34.520
<v Speaker 1>there's likely some origin story there that we want to

0:29:34.600 --> 0:29:35.480
<v Speaker 1>unpack a little bit.

0:29:35.640 --> 0:29:36.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so that.

0:29:36.400 --> 0:29:41.040
<v Speaker 1>Might be you know, trauma or attachment disruptions, so we

0:29:41.080 --> 0:29:43.280
<v Speaker 1>want to address those as well and kind of go

0:29:43.360 --> 0:29:46.240
<v Speaker 1>to the core. But in terms of practical strategies, there's

0:29:46.240 --> 0:29:49.719
<v Speaker 1>certainly things that we can try to try and disentangle

0:29:49.800 --> 0:29:51.840
<v Speaker 1>that a little bit more. What's the fact and what's

0:29:51.880 --> 0:29:57.080
<v Speaker 1>the story? So maybe let's should we do an exercise?

0:29:57.120 --> 0:29:59.480
<v Speaker 3>Let's do it? Shall we tariential? I love it?

0:30:00.840 --> 0:30:03.280
<v Speaker 1>Shall we do the We'll do the report example from

0:30:03.320 --> 0:30:07.840
<v Speaker 1>the boss? Okay, so first step is name your reaction?

0:30:08.400 --> 0:30:11.520
<v Speaker 1>So what's coming up for you? Can you just be

0:30:11.680 --> 0:30:15.440
<v Speaker 1>aware of, oh, I'm getting really angry or really upset here,

0:30:15.680 --> 0:30:19.320
<v Speaker 1>and maybe even a layer deeper, this makes me feel

0:30:19.320 --> 0:30:21.640
<v Speaker 1>like I'm not enough. Okay, So can we name the

0:30:21.680 --> 0:30:24.560
<v Speaker 1>reaction that's coming up that will give you your cue?

0:30:24.600 --> 0:30:27.560
<v Speaker 1>This is a moment to do this little exercise to

0:30:27.560 --> 0:30:30.400
<v Speaker 1>to to not react in the moment and give myself

0:30:30.400 --> 0:30:35.280
<v Speaker 1>a second to reevaluate. So step two could then be

0:30:36.800 --> 0:30:41.120
<v Speaker 1>fact versus story. So what was said or like your example,

0:30:41.160 --> 0:30:43.760
<v Speaker 1>before your boss said I want to can we have

0:30:43.800 --> 0:30:47.200
<v Speaker 1>a chat? That was the fact and the story was

0:30:48.360 --> 0:30:51.280
<v Speaker 1>I've done something wrong? Can we can we can we

0:30:51.280 --> 0:30:53.880
<v Speaker 1>start disentangling that? Or in my example that I said

0:30:53.880 --> 0:30:58.360
<v Speaker 1>before my boss said these these reports need revision and

0:30:58.520 --> 0:31:04.040
<v Speaker 1>I've heard he thinks I competent? Might and then step three,

0:31:04.280 --> 0:31:07.000
<v Speaker 1>can we come up with two alternatives? Even if you

0:31:07.040 --> 0:31:09.200
<v Speaker 1>don't buy into them, just let's just for the sake

0:31:09.240 --> 0:31:11.480
<v Speaker 1>of it, try and come up with two alternative explanations.

0:31:12.400 --> 0:31:14.680
<v Speaker 1>Can you come up with one? Why would your boss

0:31:14.760 --> 0:31:17.400
<v Speaker 1>have asked you to come for a.

0:31:17.360 --> 0:31:20.160
<v Speaker 2>Talk because I've done something wrong and I'm about to

0:31:20.200 --> 0:31:20.760
<v Speaker 2>get fired.

0:31:21.440 --> 0:31:26.240
<v Speaker 1>Okay, that's the worst'ba that's the immediate Yeah, it's Challey.

0:31:26.360 --> 0:31:27.680
<v Speaker 3>Just for the sake of it, can you come up

0:31:27.720 --> 0:31:29.920
<v Speaker 3>with two alternatives? Or like what else?

0:31:30.600 --> 0:31:34.640
<v Speaker 2>Like it could be just something like, oh, she just

0:31:34.760 --> 0:31:38.080
<v Speaker 2>wants to find out how I'm going with my project

0:31:38.120 --> 0:31:38.640
<v Speaker 2>at the moment.

0:31:38.840 --> 0:31:41.800
<v Speaker 1>Yep, totally, So it could be completely harmless. Maybe another one,

0:31:41.840 --> 0:31:42.760
<v Speaker 1>do you have any other?

0:31:43.120 --> 0:31:46.400
<v Speaker 2>Another one could be she's probably just checking if I'm

0:31:46.440 --> 0:31:50.320
<v Speaker 2>available for a certain project that I need to do.

0:31:50.360 --> 0:31:53.040
<v Speaker 2>At a certain time, or checking my availability.

0:31:53.360 --> 0:31:56.280
<v Speaker 1>Great, great, yeah, And in my example, maybe my boss

0:31:56.360 --> 0:31:58.520
<v Speaker 1>is really really under a lot of pressure and that's

0:31:58.560 --> 0:32:03.320
<v Speaker 1>why so focus on these reports, or maybe they've my

0:32:03.400 --> 0:32:06.200
<v Speaker 1>boss is really really high on relenting standards, not about

0:32:06.240 --> 0:32:08.880
<v Speaker 1>me being incompetent, but about their standards. So we can

0:32:08.920 --> 0:32:12.120
<v Speaker 1>come up with alternative stories, and then that kind of

0:32:12.160 --> 0:32:16.480
<v Speaker 1>gives us a little bit of a more bigger lens

0:32:17.120 --> 0:32:19.840
<v Speaker 1>through which to interpret what happened, rather than just going

0:32:19.840 --> 0:32:22.959
<v Speaker 1>with our initial one. Yeah, and then step four can

0:32:23.000 --> 0:32:25.000
<v Speaker 1>then be right, now that I've gone through this whole

0:32:25.040 --> 0:32:31.520
<v Speaker 1>experiment of you know, recognizing my reaction, separating fact from story,

0:32:31.560 --> 0:32:34.800
<v Speaker 1>coming up with alternatives, now, can I take that all

0:32:34.800 --> 0:32:37.800
<v Speaker 1>into consideration and figure out what, okay, what our next steps?

0:32:38.080 --> 0:32:40.360
<v Speaker 3>Is this all internal? Is this all story?

0:32:40.520 --> 0:32:45.400
<v Speaker 1>And can I rectify it within? Or is it more

0:32:45.520 --> 0:32:50.200
<v Speaker 1>likely partially fact partially story? And can I therefore address

0:32:50.240 --> 0:32:54.040
<v Speaker 1>the fact in a grounded kind of constructive way rather

0:32:54.080 --> 0:32:56.080
<v Speaker 1>than coming at it from an emotional point of view.

0:32:56.960 --> 0:32:59.600
<v Speaker 2>I love this exercise because even when you were getting

0:32:59.640 --> 0:33:03.040
<v Speaker 2>me to think about potential other scenarios, it was like

0:33:03.080 --> 0:33:05.280
<v Speaker 2>this moment when my brain was confused, I was like

0:33:05.400 --> 0:33:07.080
<v Speaker 2>what do you mean? What do you mean as other

0:33:07.160 --> 0:33:11.080
<v Speaker 2>scenarios that aren't bad, because it's just like you just

0:33:11.160 --> 0:33:13.600
<v Speaker 2>hone in on the worst case scenario because that's how

0:33:13.600 --> 0:33:16.960
<v Speaker 2>you best prepare, right. So it was interesting even me

0:33:17.040 --> 0:33:19.760
<v Speaker 2>thinking of those scenarios. I was like, oh, I felt

0:33:20.120 --> 0:33:23.200
<v Speaker 2>lighter in a way of Oh, it actually did feel

0:33:23.200 --> 0:33:25.720
<v Speaker 2>I stepped back a bit, and I'm like, oh wow, Okay, Yeah,

0:33:25.760 --> 0:33:28.000
<v Speaker 2>there could be so many other options, but I like

0:33:28.040 --> 0:33:30.680
<v Speaker 2>that you give only two because sometimes I think if

0:33:30.680 --> 0:33:33.360
<v Speaker 2>you're an overthinker like me, you can come up with

0:33:33.400 --> 0:33:36.320
<v Speaker 2>a scroll and then you're just paralyzed still in thoughts.

0:33:36.640 --> 0:33:41.040
<v Speaker 2>So I like that it's too other alternatives. Let's stick

0:33:41.080 --> 0:33:43.440
<v Speaker 2>with two, just to bring in some cognitive flexibility and

0:33:43.520 --> 0:33:45.640
<v Speaker 2>just to realize, oh my gosh, there's a lot that

0:33:45.720 --> 0:33:49.440
<v Speaker 2>I brought to this that might not be the fact.

0:33:49.200 --> 0:33:51.560
<v Speaker 3>Here at all. Yeah, totally, totally.

0:33:51.680 --> 0:33:54.240
<v Speaker 2>It's funny because you know how people always say, oh,

0:33:54.480 --> 0:33:57.040
<v Speaker 2>just get over it, like you'll be fine.

0:33:57.640 --> 0:34:00.160
<v Speaker 3>How do we actually get over it?

0:34:00.280 --> 0:34:02.760
<v Speaker 2>Like, I know you've given some strategies, is there anything

0:34:02.800 --> 0:34:04.600
<v Speaker 2>else that you would recommend? Yeah?

0:34:04.680 --> 0:34:07.000
<v Speaker 1>I think you know, once you've gone through that exercise

0:34:07.040 --> 0:34:10.279
<v Speaker 1>and you figured out Okay, the internal stuff, this is

0:34:10.320 --> 0:34:13.240
<v Speaker 1>old stuff. This is because my mum was always quite critical,

0:34:13.400 --> 0:34:16.719
<v Speaker 1>or because you know, at this one job, that's how

0:34:16.840 --> 0:34:19.120
<v Speaker 1>that conversation started. I did get fired. But this is

0:34:19.160 --> 0:34:21.600
<v Speaker 1>not the current situation. Once we've been able to kind

0:34:21.640 --> 0:34:24.880
<v Speaker 1>of work through the story stuff, if there is still fact,

0:34:25.239 --> 0:34:27.960
<v Speaker 1>you don't have to just get over it and pretend

0:34:28.040 --> 0:34:28.800
<v Speaker 1>like it's all good.

0:34:29.120 --> 0:34:29.839
<v Speaker 3>Address it.

0:34:29.960 --> 0:34:32.640
<v Speaker 1>You deserve it to be addressed, and then you can

0:34:32.640 --> 0:34:35.279
<v Speaker 1>come at it once you've done that exercise and disentangled it.

0:34:35.360 --> 0:34:37.399
<v Speaker 1>You can come at it from a more grounded, kind

0:34:37.400 --> 0:34:41.719
<v Speaker 1>of level headed perspective rather than coming in with raw emotions,

0:34:42.200 --> 0:34:44.120
<v Speaker 1>which will make it more likely that you can get

0:34:44.120 --> 0:34:45.840
<v Speaker 1>your needs heard and met.

0:34:46.640 --> 0:34:49.440
<v Speaker 3>So don't just feel like you have to bury it.

0:34:49.800 --> 0:34:52.480
<v Speaker 3>You get to address it. Yeah, yeah, I love that.

0:34:53.800 --> 0:34:56.120
<v Speaker 2>I think something that I'm curious about because I'm sure

0:34:56.280 --> 0:34:59.000
<v Speaker 2>there's people out there that are like, but Anita, I've

0:34:59.040 --> 0:35:01.520
<v Speaker 2>tried all these stratg jeez, like I've done all of

0:35:01.560 --> 0:35:04.240
<v Speaker 2>this and it's still not working. Like I'm still taking

0:35:04.280 --> 0:35:07.439
<v Speaker 2>things personally. Is that when they will come to see

0:35:07.480 --> 0:35:09.520
<v Speaker 2>you or like get further support.

0:35:09.200 --> 0:35:09.800
<v Speaker 3>In that way.

0:35:09.960 --> 0:35:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think you're you're own expert. You know, if

0:35:13.000 --> 0:35:16.000
<v Speaker 1>if this is just something that is affecting you left,

0:35:16.040 --> 0:35:18.480
<v Speaker 1>right and center and every relationship in every setting and

0:35:18.520 --> 0:35:21.200
<v Speaker 1>it's it's then it probably is a sign that there's

0:35:21.239 --> 0:35:22.880
<v Speaker 1>something a little bit deeper, and we do need to

0:35:22.920 --> 0:35:25.279
<v Speaker 1>go to the core of where this all is coming

0:35:25.320 --> 0:35:28.279
<v Speaker 1>from so that we can loosen, you know, the pullback

0:35:28.360 --> 0:35:32.440
<v Speaker 1>into taking everything personally. Therapy is not the only way though,

0:35:32.560 --> 0:35:35.839
<v Speaker 1>So there's certainly, you know, things that you can do

0:35:36.120 --> 0:35:38.640
<v Speaker 1>with repetition. If we do the sex us that we

0:35:38.760 --> 0:35:41.480
<v Speaker 1>just said over and over again and start bringing in

0:35:41.520 --> 0:35:44.799
<v Speaker 1>this cognitive flexibility in every situation, it starts to become

0:35:44.800 --> 0:35:46.319
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of a default that we don't just

0:35:46.480 --> 0:35:50.000
<v Speaker 1>run with our first story. But it's going to take

0:35:50.000 --> 0:35:52.719
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of time because again, these patterns are

0:35:52.760 --> 0:35:56.799
<v Speaker 1>well entrenched, and even just bringing in this new realization

0:35:56.880 --> 0:36:00.680
<v Speaker 1>that oh, my interpretation isn't reality, it's just my story

0:36:00.680 --> 0:36:02.719
<v Speaker 1>that I'm layering on top, I've got now got a

0:36:02.760 --> 0:36:06.040
<v Speaker 1>tool to bring in some flexibility in some room. Yeah,

0:36:06.840 --> 0:36:09.319
<v Speaker 1>it's going to take time to practice that, but it

0:36:09.360 --> 0:36:11.640
<v Speaker 1>will start to close that gap.

0:36:11.440 --> 0:36:12.840
<v Speaker 3>Between logic and feeling.

0:36:13.760 --> 0:36:16.160
<v Speaker 1>It takes emotions are a bit slower, just give it

0:36:16.200 --> 0:36:18.359
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of time with repetition that you will

0:36:18.360 --> 0:36:22.240
<v Speaker 1>get there. Yeah, and if you don't, then you deserve

0:36:22.360 --> 0:36:25.919
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of support to unpack what's going on underneath. Yeah,

0:36:25.960 --> 0:36:28.640
<v Speaker 1>it's like trusting the process, Yes, exactly.

0:36:29.280 --> 0:36:30.279
<v Speaker 3>What about if you're in.

0:36:30.200 --> 0:36:33.239
<v Speaker 2>A situation right You're hanging out with your friends and

0:36:33.360 --> 0:36:36.239
<v Speaker 2>someone throws a joke at you and everyone's having a

0:36:36.239 --> 0:36:40.319
<v Speaker 2>good laugh, but it actually hurts, like you actually do

0:36:40.400 --> 0:36:43.120
<v Speaker 2>take it personally, Like how do you address that? Like

0:36:43.120 --> 0:36:45.040
<v Speaker 2>do you raise it in the moment, do you pull

0:36:45.080 --> 0:36:48.239
<v Speaker 2>them aside later? Is it something that's just your own

0:36:48.239 --> 0:36:51.279
<v Speaker 2>inner reflection, Like yeah.

0:36:50.600 --> 0:36:53.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think there's no one right way to do it,

0:36:53.840 --> 0:36:56.719
<v Speaker 1>but I think a great place to start is to

0:36:57.360 --> 0:36:59.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of do some inner soothing as well, so you

0:37:00.080 --> 0:37:02.719
<v Speaker 1>can almost give yourself that inner part that feels a

0:37:02.719 --> 0:37:06.400
<v Speaker 1>bit vulnerable a little bit of a sort of a

0:37:06.440 --> 0:37:09.799
<v Speaker 1>symbolic hug and Zach, actually this was okay, it's not

0:37:09.920 --> 0:37:14.239
<v Speaker 1>an attack about who you are, and you know, take

0:37:14.280 --> 0:37:17.560
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of a pause before reacting. That being said,

0:37:17.640 --> 0:37:20.600
<v Speaker 1>if you feel like this friend is always mattering in

0:37:20.640 --> 0:37:23.399
<v Speaker 1>this way, that kind of you know, I'm I'm kind

0:37:23.400 --> 0:37:26.000
<v Speaker 1>of at the brunt of the joke, then you know

0:37:26.280 --> 0:37:29.160
<v Speaker 1>it's okay to address it as well. But I think, yeah,

0:37:29.320 --> 0:37:32.479
<v Speaker 1>if we've done these exercises where we're sort of these

0:37:32.520 --> 0:37:36.440
<v Speaker 1>thought exercises of going through why would this person have

0:37:36.520 --> 0:37:39.320
<v Speaker 1>said that? And is it much more about a humorous

0:37:39.320 --> 0:37:42.120
<v Speaker 1>comment and very little to do about who I am

0:37:42.200 --> 0:37:45.120
<v Speaker 1>as a person, it might already help to diffuse that.

0:37:45.719 --> 0:37:47.839
<v Speaker 1>If it still doesn't, and it's still just sitting wrong

0:37:47.880 --> 0:37:50.080
<v Speaker 1>with you and it just still hurts, then you can

0:37:50.200 --> 0:37:51.960
<v Speaker 1>do some of that in a soothing to try and

0:37:52.000 --> 0:37:55.400
<v Speaker 1>help that inner feeling, but then also feel free to

0:37:55.680 --> 0:37:57.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of address it. Maybe you could you want to

0:37:57.360 --> 0:37:59.640
<v Speaker 1>delay it. Maybe it's not right then and there. Maybe

0:37:59.640 --> 0:38:01.120
<v Speaker 1>you want to see if this plays out and again

0:38:01.160 --> 0:38:05.240
<v Speaker 1>again again, and if so, then it might become worthy

0:38:05.280 --> 0:38:08.399
<v Speaker 1>of addressing. But you're the best judge of whether that's

0:38:08.400 --> 0:38:11.439
<v Speaker 1>something that you can absorb and neutralize internally or whether

0:38:11.480 --> 0:38:14.560
<v Speaker 1>that needs to be addressed. But it's common that sometimes

0:38:14.640 --> 0:38:17.200
<v Speaker 1>intention and how it lands is not the same thing.

0:38:17.480 --> 0:38:20.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, what I really love about a sert of communication

0:38:21.080 --> 0:38:24.200
<v Speaker 2>is that you know, you're building that muscle of what

0:38:24.239 --> 0:38:26.640
<v Speaker 2>it looks like to have a healthy relationship, you know,

0:38:26.880 --> 0:38:30.000
<v Speaker 2>and fostering that but also having a healthy relationship with

0:38:30.040 --> 0:38:33.480
<v Speaker 2>yourself because when you did take something personally, that was

0:38:33.560 --> 0:38:35.920
<v Speaker 2>data telling you, hey, there's something we need to address

0:38:35.960 --> 0:38:38.800
<v Speaker 2>here for you and your value, but also your value

0:38:38.800 --> 0:38:39.800
<v Speaker 2>within that dynamic.

0:38:40.000 --> 0:38:41.799
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, there's a lot we can learn from that.

0:38:41.920 --> 0:38:42.680
<v Speaker 3>One hundred percent.

0:38:42.760 --> 0:38:44.880
<v Speaker 1>I think it's so nice how you know, in a

0:38:44.920 --> 0:38:48.320
<v Speaker 1>set of communication, I'm looking after my needs, I'm looking

0:38:48.360 --> 0:38:51.000
<v Speaker 1>after your needs, and you know, happy days we can

0:38:51.520 --> 0:38:54.400
<v Speaker 1>we can have, you know, much more of a harmonious

0:38:54.400 --> 0:38:58.240
<v Speaker 1>relationship and connection if if both of us are respected

0:38:58.239 --> 0:38:58.640
<v Speaker 1>and heard.

0:38:59.480 --> 0:39:01.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think a lot of the time, it's like

0:39:01.200 --> 0:39:03.480
<v Speaker 2>in the lead up of having those conversations, it can

0:39:03.520 --> 0:39:07.000
<v Speaker 2>be really scary, so like normalizing that because you know,

0:39:07.280 --> 0:39:09.600
<v Speaker 2>you kind of have to confront a pattern that's kind

0:39:09.640 --> 0:39:11.400
<v Speaker 2>of keeping you stuff. But once you get through the

0:39:11.440 --> 0:39:14.759
<v Speaker 2>other side you have that conversation, you feel a lot lighter.

0:39:14.600 --> 0:39:16.640
<v Speaker 3>That's true, and so much more connected as well.

0:39:16.719 --> 0:39:20.399
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's that rupture and repair process and once you're prepared, it.

0:39:20.280 --> 0:39:22.080
<v Speaker 3>Evolves your relationship or your connection.

0:39:23.320 --> 0:39:26.520
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I loved how relatable this conversation was, and I

0:39:26.560 --> 0:39:29.200
<v Speaker 2>hope you feel less alone and more equipped next time

0:39:29.239 --> 0:39:32.440
<v Speaker 2>you do take something personally. Thank you to Anita for

0:39:32.560 --> 0:39:35.880
<v Speaker 2>joining me on this episode today. You can find links

0:39:35.880 --> 0:39:43.440
<v Speaker 2>to her work in our show notes. Mama Mia acknowledges

0:39:43.480 --> 0:39:46.160
<v Speaker 2>the traditional owners of the land and waters on which

0:39:46.200 --> 0:39:47.560
<v Speaker 2>this podcast was recorded