WEBVTT - Emergency Meeting: The Blake Lively Smear Campaign Unpacked

0:00:10.327 --> 0:00:13.047
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to a MoMA Mia podcast.

0:00:13.727 --> 0:00:16.767
<v Speaker 2>Mamma Mere acknowledges the traditional owners of land and waters

0:00:16.807 --> 0:00:26.247
<v Speaker 2>that this podcast is recorded on Hello out louders. It's Monday,

0:00:26.327 --> 0:00:29.367
<v Speaker 2>the twenty third of December, and I'm Holly Wainwright, I'm

0:00:29.407 --> 0:00:30.767
<v Speaker 2>me of Friedman, and.

0:00:30.687 --> 0:00:33.407
<v Speaker 3>I'm Jesse Stevens. And we were not meant to be

0:00:33.607 --> 0:00:35.887
<v Speaker 3>here right now, but alas.

0:00:35.967 --> 0:00:40.607
<v Speaker 2>We are here because we can bury anyone inside a

0:00:40.647 --> 0:00:44.447
<v Speaker 2>Hollywood smear machine. That is the New York Times headline.

0:00:44.527 --> 0:00:47.367
<v Speaker 2>That meant we definitely had to be here right now,

0:00:47.447 --> 0:00:51.887
<v Speaker 2>Jesse Stevens, because you might remember, you definitely remember bits

0:00:51.887 --> 0:00:53.447
<v Speaker 2>of it. It was one of the stories of the

0:00:53.527 --> 0:00:56.607
<v Speaker 2>year that one of the most watched movies of twenty

0:00:56.647 --> 0:01:00.487
<v Speaker 2>twenty four, It Ends with Us, came alongside the mass

0:01:00.567 --> 0:01:05.127
<v Speaker 2>cancelation of its star, Blake Lively. The prestore that accompanied

0:01:05.127 --> 0:01:07.527
<v Speaker 2>that movie was notable for the fact that the star

0:01:07.727 --> 0:01:12.407
<v Speaker 2>and producer Lively and its other star and director, Justin Baldoni,

0:01:12.527 --> 0:01:16.007
<v Speaker 2>went to great and unusual lengths not to be seen together,

0:01:16.367 --> 0:01:19.127
<v Speaker 2>to be interviewed together, to show any of the usual

0:01:19.167 --> 0:01:23.607
<v Speaker 2>camaraderie required of co creators of a big film. Lively

0:01:23.887 --> 0:01:26.807
<v Speaker 2>the rumors went wanted to promote the movie as if

0:01:26.807 --> 0:01:32.207
<v Speaker 2>it were a flowery rom com. Baldoni supposedly loudly insisted

0:01:32.207 --> 0:01:35.367
<v Speaker 2>that he wanted its serious subject matter coercive control and

0:01:35.407 --> 0:01:39.847
<v Speaker 2>domestic violence, to be front and center. Lively was criticized

0:01:39.887 --> 0:01:43.127
<v Speaker 2>for trivializing a serious topic, for being a tone death

0:01:43.247 --> 0:01:48.527
<v Speaker 2>self promoter, for launching a haircare brand. The backlash was huge,

0:01:48.567 --> 0:01:51.967
<v Speaker 2>and then yesterday The New York Times reported that Lively

0:01:52.087 --> 0:01:55.927
<v Speaker 2>is taking legal action against Baldoni, accusing him of sexual

0:01:55.927 --> 0:01:59.687
<v Speaker 2>harassment and an effort to destroy her reputation. It's a

0:01:59.767 --> 0:02:04.127
<v Speaker 2>story that has massive implications for I'd say almost every

0:02:04.167 --> 0:02:07.607
<v Speaker 2>celebrity story you see on the internet. Mia, what did

0:02:07.647 --> 0:02:10.487
<v Speaker 2>the story the one with the we can bury anyone

0:02:10.567 --> 0:02:11.887
<v Speaker 2>headline allege?

0:02:12.247 --> 0:02:14.367
<v Speaker 4>I think Jesse's going to take us through some of

0:02:14.407 --> 0:02:19.447
<v Speaker 4>the allegations in more detail, but overall, it alleged serious

0:02:19.527 --> 0:02:22.447
<v Speaker 4>misconduct on the set. Now, what's important to understand is

0:02:22.447 --> 0:02:26.367
<v Speaker 4>that Justin was not only the director and the producer

0:02:26.527 --> 0:02:29.367
<v Speaker 4>and the co star. He also was a co owner

0:02:29.407 --> 0:02:32.447
<v Speaker 4>of the studio that was making the film. So even

0:02:32.487 --> 0:02:36.687
<v Speaker 4>though Blake Lively was more famous, he had huge power

0:02:36.767 --> 0:02:39.967
<v Speaker 4>in the context of making this film, so it alleged

0:02:40.207 --> 0:02:44.447
<v Speaker 4>sexual harassment, and then also it detailed that when Blake

0:02:44.527 --> 0:02:47.887
<v Speaker 4>Lively complained about it and insisted on a meeting with

0:02:47.967 --> 0:02:51.447
<v Speaker 4>all the stakeholders before she returned to filming in January

0:02:51.447 --> 0:02:55.007
<v Speaker 4>this year, after the writers' strike, Justin Baldoni hired a

0:02:55.007 --> 0:02:57.687
<v Speaker 4>crisis pr to smear her, which we're also going to

0:02:57.687 --> 0:03:00.007
<v Speaker 4>get into in a moment, but let's just rewind to

0:03:00.047 --> 0:03:02.487
<v Speaker 4>August to remind ourselves what this movie was about and

0:03:02.487 --> 0:03:04.927
<v Speaker 4>why there was so much controversy when it was released,

0:03:05.007 --> 0:03:08.007
<v Speaker 4>because it was only released a few months ago, and

0:03:08.367 --> 0:03:10.527
<v Speaker 4>it's about to come on streaming, or I think it's

0:03:10.607 --> 0:03:13.487
<v Speaker 4>just come on to streaming. The movie is based on

0:03:13.607 --> 0:03:16.847
<v Speaker 4>the Colleen Hoover book that was also called It Ends

0:03:16.847 --> 0:03:18.727
<v Speaker 4>with Us, and it tells the story of a florist

0:03:18.847 --> 0:03:23.407
<v Speaker 4>called Lily Bloom played by Lively, who navigates the romance

0:03:23.527 --> 0:03:28.887
<v Speaker 4>with a neurosurgeon called Ryle Kincaid that becomes abusive.

0:03:29.127 --> 0:03:30.687
<v Speaker 1>That's the essence of the film.

0:03:30.727 --> 0:03:32.887
<v Speaker 4>The three of us went to see it, it was

0:03:32.927 --> 0:03:37.007
<v Speaker 4>already completely swamped in controversy. I really liked the film.

0:03:37.087 --> 0:03:40.367
<v Speaker 4>I thought Blake Lively was fantastic. Yeah, I thought it

0:03:40.407 --> 0:03:41.727
<v Speaker 4>was not the best film in the world, but I

0:03:41.727 --> 0:03:45.167
<v Speaker 4>thought it was really good. And I was surprised at

0:03:45.207 --> 0:03:48.847
<v Speaker 4>the controversy that had completely engulfed this film. It seemed

0:03:48.887 --> 0:03:52.927
<v Speaker 4>really out of whack. So what was the controversy. Well,

0:03:52.967 --> 0:03:55.367
<v Speaker 4>there's a few different elements to it, but it was

0:03:55.407 --> 0:04:01.847
<v Speaker 4>basically all about Blake Lively being inappropriate during the promotional

0:04:02.087 --> 0:04:04.087
<v Speaker 4>part of the tour, So it wasn't about the actual

0:04:04.127 --> 0:04:07.167
<v Speaker 4>movie itself, it was about how it was promoted. There

0:04:07.207 --> 0:04:11.087
<v Speaker 4>was an interview where she encouraged fans to grab your friends,

0:04:11.127 --> 0:04:13.647
<v Speaker 4>wear your florals, and head out to see it, which

0:04:13.727 --> 0:04:17.087
<v Speaker 4>kind of suggested that it was a lighthearted viewing experience.

0:04:17.487 --> 0:04:19.807
<v Speaker 4>There was no trigger warning at the beginning of it,

0:04:19.887 --> 0:04:22.127
<v Speaker 4>so there was a whole big debate about trigger warnings,

0:04:22.847 --> 0:04:26.847
<v Speaker 4>and the whole marketing campaign was criticized as tone deaf

0:04:27.367 --> 0:04:30.447
<v Speaker 4>given how serious the themes were in the movie about

0:04:30.487 --> 0:04:34.287
<v Speaker 4>domestic abuse, and that all landed on Blake Lively. Now,

0:04:34.367 --> 0:04:36.167
<v Speaker 4>there were some things she did during the tour that

0:04:36.367 --> 0:04:39.527
<v Speaker 4>particularly made her a target of criticism, like she was

0:04:39.607 --> 0:04:42.287
<v Speaker 4>launching a hair care line at the time. She also

0:04:42.407 --> 0:04:46.607
<v Speaker 4>promoted her beverage brand, which was called Betty booze, and

0:04:47.167 --> 0:04:50.407
<v Speaker 4>many people said that alcohol is often connected with domestic violence,

0:04:50.407 --> 0:04:54.247
<v Speaker 4>so that's insensitive, and so it was seen that she

0:04:54.407 --> 0:04:57.727
<v Speaker 4>was just not taking it seriously, which led to this

0:04:57.847 --> 0:05:02.607
<v Speaker 4>big backlash against her. And you'd have to say one

0:05:02.607 --> 0:05:07.007
<v Speaker 4>of the worst cancelations that we've seen in a long

0:05:07.047 --> 0:05:11.407
<v Speaker 4>time for reasons that it seemed really spurious.

0:05:11.887 --> 0:05:15.487
<v Speaker 3>Yes, I agree, because back at the time we talked

0:05:15.487 --> 0:05:18.367
<v Speaker 3>about it, and it felt as though the facts we

0:05:18.407 --> 0:05:21.567
<v Speaker 3>had in front of us were not proportionate to the

0:05:21.847 --> 0:05:27.007
<v Speaker 3>avalanche of hate that Blake Lively was getting, particularly on TikTok.

0:05:27.087 --> 0:05:30.127
<v Speaker 3>Maybe that's because that's where I leave most of the time,

0:05:30.767 --> 0:05:33.647
<v Speaker 3>and we were getting these leaks. So the leaks that

0:05:33.687 --> 0:05:36.607
<v Speaker 3>we were getting were that there was something that said

0:05:36.687 --> 0:05:40.367
<v Speaker 3>justin Baldoni lingered too long on a kiss, He asked

0:05:40.407 --> 0:05:44.087
<v Speaker 3>how much she weighed because he had a former back

0:05:44.127 --> 0:05:46.607
<v Speaker 3>injury and was worried about picking her up like weird,

0:05:47.127 --> 0:05:47.887
<v Speaker 3>weird stuff.

0:05:48.247 --> 0:05:50.127
<v Speaker 4>None of those took hold, so there were a few

0:05:50.207 --> 0:05:53.447
<v Speaker 4>rumors of was it uncomfortable on set. The other thing

0:05:53.487 --> 0:05:58.007
<v Speaker 4>that really came out was Blake had taken over and

0:05:58.367 --> 0:06:02.167
<v Speaker 4>she'd insisted on doing her own edit that somehow Ryan

0:06:02.207 --> 0:06:04.567
<v Speaker 4>Reynolds got involved and was rewriting a few scenes.

0:06:04.607 --> 0:06:07.207
<v Speaker 1>So the image that came across through the press tour

0:06:07.727 --> 0:06:09.087
<v Speaker 1>was that she was.

0:06:09.647 --> 0:06:14.407
<v Speaker 4>Not taking it seriously, was dominating an a diva on set,

0:06:15.007 --> 0:06:18.287
<v Speaker 4>and that he was a victim of all this. Because,

0:06:18.407 --> 0:06:20.607
<v Speaker 4>in case you're not familiar with Justin Baldoni, his most

0:06:20.607 --> 0:06:23.407
<v Speaker 4>famous role as an actor was in Jane the Virgin,

0:06:24.087 --> 0:06:27.767
<v Speaker 4>and he's really fushioned himself over the last few years

0:06:27.807 --> 0:06:31.607
<v Speaker 4>as a feminist and as he has a podcast called

0:06:31.687 --> 0:06:34.527
<v Speaker 4>Man Enough where he questions toxic masculinity.

0:06:35.007 --> 0:06:37.687
<v Speaker 2>He had a viral ted talk about it like he's

0:06:37.807 --> 0:06:39.247
<v Speaker 2>very much he's that.

0:06:39.207 --> 0:06:42.207
<v Speaker 1>Guy, a champion of women. That was his vibe.

0:06:42.367 --> 0:06:44.967
<v Speaker 2>And among all these rumors, what was very clear the

0:06:45.007 --> 0:06:49.367
<v Speaker 2>whole like smoke fire thing, is that they had definitely

0:06:49.447 --> 0:06:52.407
<v Speaker 2>fallen out, Like there was no question about that. You know,

0:06:52.487 --> 0:06:55.527
<v Speaker 2>the other cast members had stopped following him on Instagram

0:06:55.527 --> 0:06:57.967
<v Speaker 2>and seemed to very much be siding with her. As

0:06:58.007 --> 0:07:00.047
<v Speaker 2>I said at the beginning, they weren't photographed together, they

0:07:00.047 --> 0:07:02.567
<v Speaker 2>didn't do any promo. It was kind of like jeweling

0:07:03.047 --> 0:07:04.887
<v Speaker 2>press tours, which is very unusual.

0:07:05.007 --> 0:07:08.927
<v Speaker 3>And Baldoni at the time he spoke to Today and

0:07:09.007 --> 0:07:12.807
<v Speaker 3>of addressing some of the creative differences, and he said,

0:07:13.287 --> 0:07:16.207
<v Speaker 3>I'm a best idea wins person and I always have

0:07:16.327 --> 0:07:18.447
<v Speaker 3>been to a fault, sometimes to a point where at

0:07:18.487 --> 0:07:20.327
<v Speaker 3>times I think I've had people wonder if I know

0:07:20.407 --> 0:07:22.367
<v Speaker 3>what I'm doing or if I have a point of view,

0:07:22.567 --> 0:07:25.607
<v Speaker 3>because I'm so willing to have my vision changed. I

0:07:25.607 --> 0:07:29.327
<v Speaker 3>don't believe that inspiration or creativity comes through one person.

0:07:29.727 --> 0:07:31.887
<v Speaker 3>On the night of the premiere, he was saying, this

0:07:31.967 --> 0:07:34.887
<v Speaker 3>isn't about me, It's a night for Blake, It's for Colleen.

0:07:35.607 --> 0:07:38.727
<v Speaker 3>I'm so grateful we're here, and again it was clear

0:07:38.767 --> 0:07:41.527
<v Speaker 3>that neither of those women were speaking to him.

0:07:42.127 --> 0:07:44.527
<v Speaker 2>What happened on the weekend is that Blake Lively has

0:07:44.527 --> 0:07:47.207
<v Speaker 2>filed a legal complaint that presents her side of the

0:07:47.247 --> 0:07:50.087
<v Speaker 2>story to all of the things that we were just discussing,

0:07:50.127 --> 0:07:52.127
<v Speaker 2>and Jesse's going to tell us about them in a minute,

0:07:52.207 --> 0:07:53.327
<v Speaker 2>but first short break.

0:08:01.407 --> 0:08:06.327
<v Speaker 3>So the allegations of misconduct on set are pretty damning

0:08:06.487 --> 0:08:11.527
<v Speaker 3>in terms of physical boundaries and relations. There are allegations

0:08:11.607 --> 0:08:15.847
<v Speaker 3>that he improvised unwanted kissing scenes. He would enter this

0:08:15.967 --> 0:08:19.127
<v Speaker 3>is Baldoni would enter her makeup trailer uninvited, while she

0:08:19.167 --> 0:08:23.367
<v Speaker 3>was undressed, including while she was breastfeeding. In terms of

0:08:23.407 --> 0:08:28.367
<v Speaker 3>sexual harassment, Baldoni and Jamie Heath, he was a producer

0:08:28.367 --> 0:08:32.647
<v Speaker 3>and co owner. There are allegations that they would describe

0:08:32.687 --> 0:08:36.527
<v Speaker 3>their genitalia on set. Baldoni would frequently refer to his

0:08:36.687 --> 0:08:40.927
<v Speaker 3>past porn addiction and describe previous sexual encounters where he

0:08:41.047 --> 0:08:45.447
<v Speaker 3>said he may or may not have received consent. Now

0:08:45.487 --> 0:08:48.767
<v Speaker 3>we know that Lively made a series of requests. Part

0:08:48.767 --> 0:08:52.247
<v Speaker 3>way through filming. They actually had this all hands meeting

0:08:52.327 --> 0:08:56.327
<v Speaker 3>which included her husband, Ryan Reynolds, and it was held

0:08:56.367 --> 0:09:01.087
<v Speaker 3>to address Baldoni and Jamie Heath's alleged inappropriate conduct.

0:09:01.287 --> 0:09:04.487
<v Speaker 4>So, yeah, this was interesting because this was like she

0:09:04.607 --> 0:09:08.247
<v Speaker 4>had Ryan there as her support person, and it was

0:09:08.287 --> 0:09:10.447
<v Speaker 4>after the Writer's strike, so they'd only been filming for

0:09:10.487 --> 0:09:12.807
<v Speaker 4>six weeks. Then that was the writer's strike and she

0:09:12.887 --> 0:09:14.887
<v Speaker 4>had this meeting and she said, I'm not coming back

0:09:15.607 --> 0:09:18.767
<v Speaker 4>unless we have this meeting. She included Sony who's the distributor,

0:09:18.767 --> 0:09:20.687
<v Speaker 4>and all these different people, So there are a lot

0:09:20.727 --> 0:09:22.767
<v Speaker 4>of people at that meeting, which means that there will

0:09:22.807 --> 0:09:25.047
<v Speaker 4>be a lot of you know, and none of this

0:09:25.527 --> 0:09:26.967
<v Speaker 4>was disputed at the time.

0:09:27.207 --> 0:09:30.847
<v Speaker 3>So there was a list of thirty things. They're quite

0:09:30.887 --> 0:09:34.607
<v Speaker 3>revealing some of Lively's requests, and these were, as you say,

0:09:34.647 --> 0:09:37.887
<v Speaker 3>they were confirmed because it's a document. Her requests were

0:09:37.927 --> 0:09:41.647
<v Speaker 3>that Baldoni would stop asking her about religious beliefs, stop

0:09:41.727 --> 0:09:44.727
<v Speaker 3>asking her trainer about her weight she was four months

0:09:44.807 --> 0:09:48.127
<v Speaker 3>postpartum with her fourth baby, and stop claiming to be

0:09:48.207 --> 0:09:52.367
<v Speaker 3>able to speak to her dead father. There are allegations

0:09:52.367 --> 0:09:56.047
<v Speaker 3>that Baldoni improvised while on set, so in one scene,

0:09:56.207 --> 0:09:58.767
<v Speaker 3>they weren't miked up. It was just to be filmed.

0:09:58.767 --> 0:10:01.727
<v Speaker 3>It was just a visual scene, and Lively claims that

0:10:01.807 --> 0:10:05.727
<v Speaker 3>as himself, Baldoni leaned in and slowly dragged his lips

0:10:05.767 --> 0:10:08.487
<v Speaker 3>from her ear to her neck and said, it smells

0:10:08.527 --> 0:10:12.767
<v Speaker 3>so good. It says that when Lively objected to his actions,

0:10:13.167 --> 0:10:18.687
<v Speaker 3>Baldoni retorted, I'm not even attracted to you. Baldoni added,

0:10:18.767 --> 0:10:22.887
<v Speaker 3>this is an allegation improvised sexual content and nude scenes,

0:10:23.047 --> 0:10:25.527
<v Speaker 3>and he fought to have a scene where the characters

0:10:25.567 --> 0:10:28.167
<v Speaker 3>climaxed at the same time on their wedding night, and

0:10:28.247 --> 0:10:31.607
<v Speaker 3>told Lively that he and his partner always did, and

0:10:31.647 --> 0:10:34.567
<v Speaker 3>allegedly pressed her on whether that was the case with

0:10:34.727 --> 0:10:37.767
<v Speaker 3>her husband. And she says she was very uncomfortable by

0:10:37.767 --> 0:10:42.887
<v Speaker 3>that conversation. There's an allegation about the childbirth scene, which

0:10:42.927 --> 0:10:46.367
<v Speaker 3>is particularly unsettling. It wasn't agreed that she would be

0:10:46.487 --> 0:10:48.287
<v Speaker 3>naked for it, but then when she got on set,

0:10:48.367 --> 0:10:52.247
<v Speaker 3>she says that he insisted she be naked. They compromised

0:10:52.647 --> 0:10:55.327
<v Speaker 3>that she would be naked from the waist down, but

0:10:55.887 --> 0:10:59.607
<v Speaker 3>the set wasn't closed and in the end his friend

0:10:59.767 --> 0:11:02.527
<v Speaker 3>came in to play the role of the obgyn.

0:11:02.927 --> 0:11:05.887
<v Speaker 4>I think this is possibly the most chilling thing because

0:11:05.927 --> 0:11:08.527
<v Speaker 4>what's so illuminating about reading will link to it if

0:11:08.607 --> 0:11:11.367
<v Speaker 4>anybody wants to look at it, which I think you should.

0:11:11.527 --> 0:11:14.567
<v Speaker 4>But you learn a lot about Hollywood and how sex

0:11:14.607 --> 0:11:17.327
<v Speaker 4>scenes work right, and there are things like nudity writers

0:11:17.367 --> 0:11:21.287
<v Speaker 4>where everybody agrees what the parameters before.

0:11:21.047 --> 0:11:22.087
<v Speaker 1>You go into a scene.

0:11:22.087 --> 0:11:25.407
<v Speaker 4>Things like closed sets when there's nudity, so only essential

0:11:25.407 --> 0:11:28.327
<v Speaker 4>people are there, Monitors are turned off so other people

0:11:28.367 --> 0:11:30.767
<v Speaker 4>can't look from other rooms and even film you.

0:11:31.287 --> 0:11:32.607
<v Speaker 1>So she was in stirrups.

0:11:32.647 --> 0:11:35.487
<v Speaker 4>She had a little bit of fabric just literally covering

0:11:35.487 --> 0:11:39.127
<v Speaker 4>her and the role of the gynecologist. They were like

0:11:39.167 --> 0:11:43.967
<v Speaker 4>between her legs and also another owner of his studio

0:11:44.087 --> 0:11:46.887
<v Speaker 4>Wayfair had just flown in to visit the set on

0:11:46.967 --> 0:11:50.127
<v Speaker 4>that day for the first time, like it is so

0:11:50.887 --> 0:11:51.967
<v Speaker 4>gross and creepy.

0:11:52.527 --> 0:11:56.207
<v Speaker 2>It also is clearly from this very long list of

0:11:56.327 --> 0:12:00.247
<v Speaker 2>requests clear that this set was a shit show, right

0:12:00.287 --> 0:12:04.007
<v Speaker 2>because one of them is also stop having hours long

0:12:04.127 --> 0:12:09.607
<v Speaker 2>meetings where Baldoni cries and no more pressing from Baldly

0:12:09.767 --> 0:12:14.687
<v Speaker 2>to sage any of Blake Live's employees, like this is

0:12:14.727 --> 0:12:17.327
<v Speaker 2>batshit what's going on on that set, And it seems

0:12:17.327 --> 0:12:19.367
<v Speaker 2>that she's very much trying to say, let's get back

0:12:19.367 --> 0:12:21.207
<v Speaker 2>to a professional set.

0:12:21.407 --> 0:12:23.407
<v Speaker 3>And they're at claims as well that when you know

0:12:23.447 --> 0:12:26.127
<v Speaker 3>there were certain moments where Lively was made to feel uncomfortable,

0:12:26.167 --> 0:12:28.847
<v Speaker 3>other women from the set came up and said, I've

0:12:28.847 --> 0:12:32.047
<v Speaker 3>also had that experience. So the allegations are that it

0:12:32.207 --> 0:12:34.327
<v Speaker 3>was not just her, she was trying to protect the

0:12:34.327 --> 0:12:36.727
<v Speaker 3>whole set. The last thing I'll say, and I.

0:12:36.687 --> 0:12:38.607
<v Speaker 1>Could go on and on about what's in this.

0:12:38.727 --> 0:12:42.767
<v Speaker 3>Complaint, but the last thing is she alleges that there

0:12:42.887 --> 0:12:47.727
<v Speaker 3>was a clear marketing plan that was distributed to the

0:12:47.807 --> 0:12:51.367
<v Speaker 3>cast and everyone involved in marketing it about how to

0:12:51.407 --> 0:12:54.047
<v Speaker 3>promote the film. This was from Sony and they said

0:12:54.407 --> 0:12:57.087
<v Speaker 3>they wanted to focus on hope and resilience and not

0:12:57.247 --> 0:13:00.927
<v Speaker 3>position this as a domestic violence film. They say that

0:13:01.007 --> 0:13:05.607
<v Speaker 3>Baldoni went against this, and that's massive because at the

0:13:05.647 --> 0:13:09.567
<v Speaker 3>time everyone was going, why is she not acknowledged that

0:13:09.607 --> 0:13:12.647
<v Speaker 3>this is a film about domestic violence. Baldoni was over

0:13:12.687 --> 0:13:16.767
<v Speaker 3>here with a link in his Instagram bio to help victims.

0:13:17.167 --> 0:13:21.367
<v Speaker 3>Everything he said in his messaging was acknowledging victims, and

0:13:21.447 --> 0:13:24.247
<v Speaker 3>this made Lively look really bad.

0:13:24.967 --> 0:13:27.127
<v Speaker 2>Well, as it turns out, or at least what's alleged

0:13:27.167 --> 0:13:30.927
<v Speaker 2>here is that that pivot Jesse was a very deliberate

0:13:30.927 --> 0:13:35.407
<v Speaker 2>one to smear Blake Lively because Baldoni and his team

0:13:35.567 --> 0:13:39.007
<v Speaker 2>knew what was coming. So to the smear campaign and

0:13:39.047 --> 0:13:41.847
<v Speaker 2>why I say that this is a story that's not

0:13:41.887 --> 0:13:44.247
<v Speaker 2>just about Blake Lively and just In Baldoni, but gives

0:13:44.407 --> 0:13:48.047
<v Speaker 2>an insight into what is really behind a lot of

0:13:48.047 --> 0:13:51.007
<v Speaker 2>what we believe right on social media. So all those

0:13:51.047 --> 0:13:53.127
<v Speaker 2>tiktoks and stories that we talked about at the beginning

0:13:53.167 --> 0:13:56.207
<v Speaker 2>that were being shared and reshared as facts that Lively

0:13:56.327 --> 0:13:59.207
<v Speaker 2>was a mean girl, that Lively tried to hijack the movie,

0:13:59.727 --> 0:14:02.767
<v Speaker 2>that Lively just wanted to promote a haircare brand. What's

0:14:02.807 --> 0:14:06.207
<v Speaker 2>alleged in this document is there was nothing organic about

0:14:06.247 --> 0:14:10.087
<v Speaker 2>those stories, and that the PR firm hired by when

0:14:10.087 --> 0:14:14.967
<v Speaker 2>he realized that Reynolds had blocked him on Instagram, Baldonian,

0:14:15.047 --> 0:14:18.167
<v Speaker 2>his producing partner, hired this firm who were expert in

0:14:18.247 --> 0:14:21.607
<v Speaker 2>the dark arts of smearing, starting rumors and fanning the

0:14:21.647 --> 0:14:24.967
<v Speaker 2>flames of negativity. Some of the tactics that are alleged

0:14:24.967 --> 0:14:28.527
<v Speaker 2>to have happened are that the PR team would boost

0:14:28.607 --> 0:14:32.447
<v Speaker 2>negative stories about Lively, branding her as difficult and tone deaf.

0:14:32.927 --> 0:14:36.527
<v Speaker 2>That contractors were allegedly hired to dominate social media with

0:14:36.607 --> 0:14:42.367
<v Speaker 2>untraceable tactics like social manipulation and proactive fan posting. A

0:14:42.487 --> 0:14:46.527
<v Speaker 2>hired gun helped amplify negative narratives online, including on platforms

0:14:46.567 --> 0:14:50.887
<v Speaker 2>like TikTok and Reddit, and basically all these threads of

0:14:51.007 --> 0:14:54.847
<v Speaker 2>theories started being sown and then amplified. Now it's actually

0:14:54.887 --> 0:14:58.087
<v Speaker 2>impossible even by the investigative journalists at the New York

0:14:58.087 --> 0:15:01.487
<v Speaker 2>Times and actually by the legal team, to be able

0:15:01.527 --> 0:15:05.807
<v Speaker 2>to absolutely identify exactly what the amplification did. As we know,

0:15:05.847 --> 0:15:09.087
<v Speaker 2>the Internet is sprawling and enormous. But the negative stories

0:15:09.087 --> 0:15:13.887
<v Speaker 2>that were planted, were planted very deliberately and then encouraged.

0:15:14.047 --> 0:15:17.527
<v Speaker 2>So this tells you everything about how we the public

0:15:18.007 --> 0:15:20.247
<v Speaker 2>were manipulated in this story.

0:15:20.647 --> 0:15:23.447
<v Speaker 3>In August, there were two things we talked about. The

0:15:23.527 --> 0:15:26.847
<v Speaker 3>first was something that we've referred to as the dig,

0:15:27.287 --> 0:15:29.567
<v Speaker 3>which is what happens when someone is in the process

0:15:29.607 --> 0:15:33.527
<v Speaker 3>of cancelation, and we were saying that it's again back

0:15:33.527 --> 0:15:37.087
<v Speaker 3>to it being disproportionate. Is that people started yelling about

0:15:37.087 --> 0:15:42.727
<v Speaker 3>her plantation wedding, about how Reynolds cheated on Scarlet your

0:15:42.767 --> 0:15:46.567
<v Speaker 3>Hansen with Lively, how she's always been rude. Everyone on

0:15:46.607 --> 0:15:50.207
<v Speaker 3>Gossip Girl hated her. There were weird videos of people

0:15:50.407 --> 0:15:52.607
<v Speaker 3>gifting her a bracelet on a red carpet and she

0:15:52.607 --> 0:15:54.927
<v Speaker 3>would not accept it, or something like.

0:15:55.007 --> 0:15:57.847
<v Speaker 4>The one that got the most traction was and I

0:15:57.887 --> 0:16:00.847
<v Speaker 4>remember thinking at the time, this is weird. Without wanting to,

0:16:01.207 --> 0:16:03.487
<v Speaker 4>we definitely had our doubts and we spoke about this

0:16:03.567 --> 0:16:08.367
<v Speaker 4>on the show, as did others. That interview with a

0:16:08.527 --> 0:16:12.807
<v Speaker 4>Swedish journal last entertainment journalist called Christie Flaher which came

0:16:12.847 --> 0:16:15.447
<v Speaker 4>out where it showed her interviewing Blake Lively for a

0:16:15.447 --> 0:16:19.687
<v Speaker 4>different movie. I think back in twenty fifteen, and it

0:16:19.807 --> 0:16:23.407
<v Speaker 4>showed Blake being a little bit rude, and for some

0:16:23.527 --> 0:16:26.447
<v Speaker 4>reason she posted that with the headline the interview that

0:16:26.487 --> 0:16:29.847
<v Speaker 4>made me want to quit my job. That was in

0:16:29.887 --> 0:16:33.807
<v Speaker 4>twenty sixteen. That interview happened, and yet it came out.

0:16:34.447 --> 0:16:37.167
<v Speaker 4>Now why did it come out? Well, you could say

0:16:37.167 --> 0:16:40.647
<v Speaker 4>that organically that journalist was just trying to ride the

0:16:40.647 --> 0:16:43.967
<v Speaker 4>wave of hate against Blake Lively. But what was revealed

0:16:43.967 --> 0:16:47.767
<v Speaker 4>in this was that this journalist had worked with the

0:16:47.807 --> 0:16:51.447
<v Speaker 4>PR company before, because they'd also represented Johnny Depp in

0:16:51.487 --> 0:16:55.527
<v Speaker 4>his trial against Amber Heard. And we know that some

0:16:55.567 --> 0:16:59.207
<v Speaker 4>really dodgy things happened then, in terms of how Amber

0:16:59.247 --> 0:17:03.007
<v Speaker 4>Heard was trolled and the volume of internet hate towards her,

0:17:03.687 --> 0:17:07.207
<v Speaker 4>so much of which was seen to be manufactured. So again,

0:17:07.327 --> 0:17:09.847
<v Speaker 4>it wasn't organic. And there's a word called ASTROI which

0:17:09.847 --> 0:17:13.967
<v Speaker 4>I learned, which is basically means you think something is

0:17:14.047 --> 0:17:16.647
<v Speaker 4>organic it looks like natural grass, but when you look.

0:17:16.487 --> 0:17:18.327
<v Speaker 1>Closer you see that it's artificial.

0:17:18.607 --> 0:17:21.607
<v Speaker 4>And what that means is that these things are planted

0:17:21.727 --> 0:17:23.727
<v Speaker 4>and then amplified.

0:17:23.367 --> 0:17:26.447
<v Speaker 1>Either by bots or by these agencies. That's what they do.

0:17:26.727 --> 0:17:29.567
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, So in terms of being planted, I think That's

0:17:29.607 --> 0:17:33.847
<v Speaker 3>an important point because in the investigation it sort of

0:17:33.887 --> 0:17:36.807
<v Speaker 3>said this isn't bots. I always imagined it was bots.

0:17:37.327 --> 0:17:41.367
<v Speaker 3>But at the time, I was posting on TikTok about

0:17:41.367 --> 0:17:44.167
<v Speaker 3>the Blake Lively thing, and I was noticing that every

0:17:44.207 --> 0:17:47.887
<v Speaker 3>time I posted something that was defensive, it got no reach.

0:17:48.047 --> 0:17:50.207
<v Speaker 3>So I remember talking about this on the show, only

0:17:50.407 --> 0:17:53.087
<v Speaker 3>a few hundred views, and then I posted one thing

0:17:53.087 --> 0:17:56.167
<v Speaker 3>that was cheeky that had like a something about Blake

0:17:56.207 --> 0:17:59.367
<v Speaker 3>Lively's cancelation. It actually went against it, but all the

0:17:59.407 --> 0:18:01.607
<v Speaker 3>metadata would have suggested that I was about to go

0:18:01.687 --> 0:18:06.807
<v Speaker 3>her blew up, and it seemed that if you were

0:18:06.847 --> 0:18:11.487
<v Speaker 3>being critical of Blake Lively, your content was on steroids.

0:18:11.807 --> 0:18:14.767
<v Speaker 3>As someone who consumes a lot of social media content,

0:18:14.927 --> 0:18:18.047
<v Speaker 3>it is not often that you get a unanimous view

0:18:18.367 --> 0:18:23.007
<v Speaker 3>on anything, but you went onto these media platforms and

0:18:23.167 --> 0:18:26.927
<v Speaker 3>all of a sudden, it was like wall to wall.

0:18:27.967 --> 0:18:31.687
<v Speaker 3>Everyone hated her. And let's be clear, if you saw

0:18:31.727 --> 0:18:33.887
<v Speaker 3>someone pop up and have a go at Blake Lively,

0:18:34.967 --> 0:18:38.567
<v Speaker 3>that was probably legitimate. But where they were getting the information,

0:18:39.247 --> 0:18:43.087
<v Speaker 3>how their brain had been marinating in content kind of

0:18:43.567 --> 0:18:44.367
<v Speaker 3>contributed to that.

0:18:44.767 --> 0:18:47.327
<v Speaker 4>Well. It creates a lens, and I should say, Christy

0:18:47.407 --> 0:18:49.487
<v Speaker 4>Flower has come out and said she has nothing to

0:18:49.487 --> 0:18:53.567
<v Speaker 4>do with the alleged smear campaign, But she was exactly

0:18:53.567 --> 0:18:56.767
<v Speaker 4>what you were talking about, Jesse. She was being opportunistic. Yes,

0:18:56.847 --> 0:18:59.927
<v Speaker 4>so we live in the attention economy and if you

0:19:00.047 --> 0:19:03.527
<v Speaker 4>wanted to go viral, everybody looks at the numbers who

0:19:03.527 --> 0:19:06.407
<v Speaker 4>makes content and in the media, so you knew that

0:19:06.447 --> 0:19:10.447
<v Speaker 4>if you did something that was against Lively, it would

0:19:10.487 --> 0:19:13.687
<v Speaker 4>go off. So it's important to understand how something can

0:19:13.727 --> 0:19:17.087
<v Speaker 4>be both organic and manipulated because.

0:19:16.847 --> 0:19:19.527
<v Speaker 1>People will say, but hang on Blake Lively.

0:19:19.607 --> 0:19:23.247
<v Speaker 4>They didn't make her try and promote her hair care line,

0:19:23.287 --> 0:19:26.607
<v Speaker 4>they didn't make her reference alcohol, they didn't make her

0:19:26.647 --> 0:19:27.727
<v Speaker 4>wear florals.

0:19:28.527 --> 0:19:32.247
<v Speaker 1>But the thing is that it's the volume, so you can.

0:19:32.087 --> 0:19:35.487
<v Speaker 4>Start to believe, oh, everybody hates Blake Lively, and when

0:19:35.487 --> 0:19:39.127
<v Speaker 4>you hear enough of that, it does impact on how

0:19:39.167 --> 0:19:39.967
<v Speaker 4>you view someone.

0:19:40.207 --> 0:19:44.727
<v Speaker 3>And there was also I remember looking at interviews where

0:19:44.847 --> 0:19:48.567
<v Speaker 3>she seemed really insensitive about the subject matter of the film,

0:19:48.927 --> 0:19:51.567
<v Speaker 3>but it was so purposefully cut and if you watch

0:19:51.607 --> 0:19:54.207
<v Speaker 3>the whole interview, that's not how it seemed. And then

0:19:54.247 --> 0:19:56.927
<v Speaker 3>you were getting Justin Baldoni with these incredible cuts of

0:19:57.287 --> 0:20:01.047
<v Speaker 3>him saying something really eloquent about domestic violence. So it

0:20:01.087 --> 0:20:04.607
<v Speaker 3>did seem that, yeah, I suppose that that is allegedly

0:20:04.647 --> 0:20:05.407
<v Speaker 3>part of the smearing.

0:20:06.087 --> 0:20:09.367
<v Speaker 2>This is where the we can bury anyone headline comes

0:20:09.647 --> 0:20:13.407
<v Speaker 2>because in the New York Times investigation, there are literal

0:20:13.447 --> 0:20:18.687
<v Speaker 2>screenshots of text messages between Baldoni's people and the PR

0:20:18.767 --> 0:20:22.927
<v Speaker 2>people saying exactly that that they can bury anybody with

0:20:23.087 --> 0:20:25.807
<v Speaker 2>enough ammunition, and that they needed to do it to

0:20:25.807 --> 0:20:28.927
<v Speaker 2>get Baldoni's story across. We're going to be back in

0:20:28.967 --> 0:20:30.647
<v Speaker 2>a minute, but first a little break.

0:20:37.247 --> 0:20:41.007
<v Speaker 4>I want to talk about the effect of how cancelation

0:20:41.167 --> 0:20:45.327
<v Speaker 4>works and how it can be manipulated, because, having experienced

0:20:45.367 --> 0:20:48.567
<v Speaker 4>it a number of times organically, certainly not to my knowledge,

0:20:48.567 --> 0:20:52.407
<v Speaker 4>with a calculated or paid smear campaign by a publicist,

0:20:53.647 --> 0:20:57.847
<v Speaker 4>things gain traction, and then everybody wants to be part

0:20:57.847 --> 0:21:00.007
<v Speaker 4>of a pylon, right, That's why it's called a dog

0:21:00.047 --> 0:21:06.047
<v Speaker 4>pile or a pylon, and there becomes status in reinforcing

0:21:06.447 --> 0:21:10.967
<v Speaker 4>the accepted narrative, which in this case was that Justin

0:21:11.007 --> 0:21:13.967
<v Speaker 4>Baldoni was a hero and cared about domestic violence victims,

0:21:14.167 --> 0:21:17.727
<v Speaker 4>and Blake Lively was an entitled diva who cared about

0:21:17.727 --> 0:21:20.407
<v Speaker 4>nothing other than her hair and looking pretty.

0:21:20.967 --> 0:21:24.287
<v Speaker 2>And because of that that sort of narrative about who

0:21:24.287 --> 0:21:27.527
<v Speaker 2>Blake Lively was, she's a prime candidate for this, right,

0:21:28.047 --> 0:21:31.767
<v Speaker 2>because the thing that's very depressing about this story is

0:21:31.807 --> 0:21:34.087
<v Speaker 2>that we're all being manipulated all the time right on

0:21:34.127 --> 0:21:36.607
<v Speaker 2>social media, and we think we're having our own thoughts

0:21:36.647 --> 0:21:39.247
<v Speaker 2>about things and going, yes, I see, But what this

0:21:39.327 --> 0:21:42.487
<v Speaker 2>shows very clearly is that we're being As Lively said

0:21:42.527 --> 0:21:44.487
<v Speaker 2>in her statement about it, she said she wanted to

0:21:44.527 --> 0:21:47.407
<v Speaker 2>show behind the curtain of how these things start. But

0:21:47.527 --> 0:21:50.047
<v Speaker 2>one of the things that we've got to ask ourselves

0:21:50.167 --> 0:21:54.087
<v Speaker 2>is why are we so invested in thinking awful things

0:21:54.087 --> 0:21:58.567
<v Speaker 2>about women? And women like Lively? You know she in particular,

0:21:58.687 --> 0:22:01.607
<v Speaker 2>I guess she is blonde and beautiful, married to a

0:22:01.727 --> 0:22:03.967
<v Speaker 2>rich man. She is a striver we've talked about on

0:22:04.007 --> 0:22:05.727
<v Speaker 2>this show lots of times, is the worst thing you

0:22:05.847 --> 0:22:09.247
<v Speaker 2>can be. She has her own businesses, She tries really

0:22:09.327 --> 0:22:12.607
<v Speaker 2>heart like, she promoted the shit out of that movie,

0:22:12.967 --> 0:22:16.927
<v Speaker 2>and it's almost like the world was dying to believe

0:22:16.967 --> 0:22:18.887
<v Speaker 2>this about her, which is one of the things I

0:22:19.047 --> 0:22:21.727
<v Speaker 2>find deeply depressing about it.

0:22:21.807 --> 0:22:25.167
<v Speaker 3>And that's what the crisis pr person behind all of

0:22:25.167 --> 0:22:28.087
<v Speaker 3>this actually said in one of them. And the reason

0:22:28.087 --> 0:22:29.967
<v Speaker 3>we have these texts, I should say, is because they

0:22:29.967 --> 0:22:34.967
<v Speaker 3>were subpoened. So it's the genius of Blake Lively, and

0:22:35.007 --> 0:22:36.887
<v Speaker 3>all of this is to go, I'm going to get

0:22:36.887 --> 0:22:40.007
<v Speaker 3>all the evidence I need to show what really happened,

0:22:40.367 --> 0:22:44.527
<v Speaker 3>which is that you have Melissa Nathan saying basically, I

0:22:44.567 --> 0:22:47.647
<v Speaker 3>can't believe how quickly people just want to hate a woman.

0:22:47.967 --> 0:22:50.887
<v Speaker 3>I'm seeing all this positive justin Baldoni stuff, and I

0:22:50.887 --> 0:22:53.167
<v Speaker 3>don't even agree with half of it. So it was

0:22:53.327 --> 0:22:57.327
<v Speaker 3>like they lit the fire and then when it blew up,

0:22:57.407 --> 0:23:01.927
<v Speaker 3>they didn't need to do a thing, because people want

0:23:02.327 --> 0:23:06.407
<v Speaker 3>to hate a woman. And the irony of this entire

0:23:06.527 --> 0:23:10.207
<v Speaker 3>story is that it's an allegory for domestic violence in

0:23:10.247 --> 0:23:13.407
<v Speaker 3>the context of a film about domestic violence, which is

0:23:13.447 --> 0:23:19.327
<v Speaker 3>that people were so ready to jump on a woman

0:23:19.887 --> 0:23:25.127
<v Speaker 3>who maybe didn't use the right words, or was profiting

0:23:25.367 --> 0:23:30.487
<v Speaker 3>or something. And except that this man was a feminist ally,

0:23:30.727 --> 0:23:34.487
<v Speaker 3>it's almost Shakespearean in that in order to defend his

0:23:34.647 --> 0:23:37.127
<v Speaker 3>image as a feminist ally he had to bury a

0:23:37.167 --> 0:23:41.367
<v Speaker 3>female co star, and we were so happy to follow

0:23:41.447 --> 0:23:44.647
<v Speaker 3>him there, and to go not only follow him there,

0:23:45.767 --> 0:23:48.807
<v Speaker 3>like we didn't look at all the facts, which is

0:23:48.847 --> 0:23:52.767
<v Speaker 3>that none of the cast were on speaking terms with

0:23:52.847 --> 0:23:56.567
<v Speaker 3>him anymore. Colleen who all on her side, yes, and

0:23:56.607 --> 0:24:00.087
<v Speaker 3>we were so happy to follow him there. And I

0:24:00.087 --> 0:24:04.727
<v Speaker 3>think that there's a difference between doing something and expressing

0:24:04.767 --> 0:24:07.407
<v Speaker 3>the doing of something. This speaks to something that feels

0:24:07.527 --> 0:24:11.287
<v Speaker 3>very very true, which is that there are people who

0:24:11.407 --> 0:24:13.287
<v Speaker 3>use the right word to have the right link in

0:24:13.327 --> 0:24:18.207
<v Speaker 3>their Instagram bio. But that is not the same as

0:24:18.287 --> 0:24:21.207
<v Speaker 3>being the thing you're purporting to being, which is that

0:24:21.287 --> 0:24:25.647
<v Speaker 3>he's saying he supports women and that this story was

0:24:25.687 --> 0:24:31.087
<v Speaker 3>really important to him. It's just an incredible, like look

0:24:31.127 --> 0:24:34.007
<v Speaker 3>at potential if it's true hypocrisy.

0:24:34.247 --> 0:24:37.287
<v Speaker 2>I think this story has many places to go. And

0:24:37.567 --> 0:24:42.527
<v Speaker 2>today one of the PR wizards involved in this, Jennifer Abel,

0:24:42.607 --> 0:24:45.607
<v Speaker 2>has some messages that are allegedly from her, who's saying

0:24:45.607 --> 0:24:47.847
<v Speaker 2>that those messages that we were just talking about, Jesse

0:24:48.407 --> 0:24:50.767
<v Speaker 2>were cherry picked and that you didn't see others. And

0:24:50.807 --> 0:24:52.727
<v Speaker 2>I'm sure that's true. So there's are many more places

0:24:52.767 --> 0:24:55.447
<v Speaker 2>to go. But your point, Jesse is so spot on,

0:24:55.527 --> 0:24:58.287
<v Speaker 2>because I remember at the time a lot of people

0:24:58.287 --> 0:25:00.607
<v Speaker 2>have a lot of love for Baldoni and he was

0:25:00.647 --> 0:25:03.487
<v Speaker 2>seen to be doing all the right things. But I'll

0:25:03.527 --> 0:25:05.407
<v Speaker 2>just listened to the interview with him that he did

0:25:05.447 --> 0:25:09.487
<v Speaker 2>on how to Fail with Elizabeth Day and the guy Worry.

0:25:09.607 --> 0:25:12.887
<v Speaker 2>I'm just going to say it is insufferable, like he

0:25:13.047 --> 0:25:17.647
<v Speaker 2>is insufferable. He doesn't obviously go to Lively in that interview,

0:25:17.847 --> 0:25:21.927
<v Speaker 2>and it happened before the legal letter, but he described

0:25:21.927 --> 0:25:24.607
<v Speaker 2>the filming as devastatingly difficult for a number of reasons.

0:25:24.967 --> 0:25:26.847
<v Speaker 2>He made very clear on the record that he thought

0:25:26.847 --> 0:25:28.647
<v Speaker 2>there should have been a trigger warning, like it was

0:25:28.807 --> 0:25:34.367
<v Speaker 2>very clear. But the whole feeling about it, Elizabeth Day

0:25:34.367 --> 0:25:38.247
<v Speaker 2>barely gets a word in, is that he was lecturing

0:25:38.447 --> 0:25:42.487
<v Speaker 2>about victimhood. And we are always saying that we want

0:25:42.607 --> 0:25:45.447
<v Speaker 2>men to talk about domestic violence, and we do, but

0:25:45.567 --> 0:25:49.007
<v Speaker 2>we want men to talk to men about domestic violence.

0:25:49.527 --> 0:25:53.887
<v Speaker 2>We don't want them to lecture women about it. And

0:25:53.967 --> 0:25:56.007
<v Speaker 2>I know people have problems with the movie, and people

0:25:56.007 --> 0:25:58.567
<v Speaker 2>have problems with the source material of the book, But

0:25:58.727 --> 0:26:01.087
<v Speaker 2>this movie was aimed at women. The book was aimed

0:26:01.087 --> 0:26:04.167
<v Speaker 2>at women, right. It's the way that they chose to

0:26:04.207 --> 0:26:07.327
<v Speaker 2>promote it. That Baldoni then flipped in order to virtue

0:26:07.367 --> 0:26:10.207
<v Speaker 2>signal because he knew basically that he was going to

0:26:10.247 --> 0:26:12.887
<v Speaker 2>be taken down. What's also interested in all this is

0:26:12.927 --> 0:26:16.327
<v Speaker 2>that Ryan Reynolds and Blake Lively and the power that

0:26:16.367 --> 0:26:18.687
<v Speaker 2>they wield in Hollywood is probably always going to come

0:26:18.727 --> 0:26:21.847
<v Speaker 2>for him, right, So he knew that was coming, so

0:26:21.887 --> 0:26:26.167
<v Speaker 2>he wanted to position himself as the perfect allocate ally

0:26:26.247 --> 0:26:30.887
<v Speaker 2>and advocate, and he's there lecturing women about victimhood and violence.

0:26:31.407 --> 0:26:34.487
<v Speaker 2>That's not what we want from the guys. I mean,

0:26:34.527 --> 0:26:36.687
<v Speaker 2>I can't speak for all women.

0:26:36.487 --> 0:26:38.887
<v Speaker 4>But can we talk about timing for a second, because

0:26:39.367 --> 0:26:41.447
<v Speaker 4>it's pretty sobering to go online and look at some

0:26:41.527 --> 0:26:45.967
<v Speaker 4>of the reactions to this where people are just they

0:26:46.007 --> 0:26:48.087
<v Speaker 4>want to twist it and still make it about Blake

0:26:48.207 --> 0:26:53.047
<v Speaker 4>and they're not interested in facts or perspectives. Why now,

0:26:53.687 --> 0:26:57.447
<v Speaker 4>Why now it's pre Christmas? Some people have said, well,

0:26:57.527 --> 0:27:00.287
<v Speaker 4>it's just come out on Netflix. It's a calculated move.

0:27:01.047 --> 0:27:03.887
<v Speaker 4>She wants to just try and salvage the damage to

0:27:03.927 --> 0:27:07.847
<v Speaker 4>her reputation. But she didn't say anything back then like

0:27:07.967 --> 0:27:09.967
<v Speaker 4>this is everyone had gotten about it.

0:27:10.047 --> 0:27:11.727
<v Speaker 1>Essentially, she'd come back.

0:27:12.127 --> 0:27:15.487
<v Speaker 3>Why now it would have been totally lost. If she

0:27:15.567 --> 0:27:18.167
<v Speaker 3>said something back then, she would have sounded And this

0:27:18.287 --> 0:27:21.767
<v Speaker 3>is also such a great example of gas lighting. She

0:27:21.927 --> 0:27:24.847
<v Speaker 3>would have been told she was crazy. If she said

0:27:24.847 --> 0:27:28.847
<v Speaker 3>at the time that there is a manufactured effort to

0:27:28.927 --> 0:27:33.887
<v Speaker 3>bury me, people would have gone, you are grasping, how embarrassing, blah.

0:27:33.727 --> 0:27:36.087
<v Speaker 4>Blah blah, and that she was making it all about

0:27:36.127 --> 0:27:39.367
<v Speaker 4>her instead of centering the centering victims.

0:27:39.407 --> 0:27:41.487
<v Speaker 3>It's about to come out on Netflix. I'm not sure

0:27:41.527 --> 0:27:43.567
<v Speaker 3>if that's just in the US or if that's here too.

0:27:43.847 --> 0:27:47.607
<v Speaker 3>And just in the last week I started seeing stories

0:27:47.607 --> 0:27:50.487
<v Speaker 3>about Blake Lively pop up again. I saw a story

0:27:50.607 --> 0:27:54.047
<v Speaker 3>about something Ryan Reynolds had said about how he and

0:27:54.127 --> 0:27:56.567
<v Speaker 3>Blake grew up working class, and then people were going

0:27:56.567 --> 0:28:00.447
<v Speaker 3>into Blake Lively's childhood and going, that's not working class,

0:28:00.447 --> 0:28:01.167
<v Speaker 3>how embarrassing.

0:28:01.967 --> 0:28:02.127
<v Speaker 2>Ah.

0:28:02.327 --> 0:28:07.207
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, were they anticipating another wave? That's a question. And

0:28:07.247 --> 0:28:11.367
<v Speaker 3>the other reason why I think it's is because of

0:28:11.567 --> 0:28:14.407
<v Speaker 3>how long this takes. In order to do this properly,

0:28:15.007 --> 0:28:19.087
<v Speaker 3>in order to get lawyers do the research subpoena, those

0:28:19.407 --> 0:28:25.127
<v Speaker 3>text messages prove it they needed to buide their time.

0:28:25.327 --> 0:28:29.407
<v Speaker 3>And it's important to remember Blake Lively is worth about

0:28:29.407 --> 0:28:34.327
<v Speaker 3>thirty million dollars. She's rich, but she's not like the

0:28:34.407 --> 0:28:37.447
<v Speaker 3>richest person in Hollywood Ryan Reynolds is worth more than

0:28:37.447 --> 0:28:40.407
<v Speaker 3>three hundred million because he hasn't had these business ventures.

0:28:40.087 --> 0:28:43.127
<v Speaker 2>Right and also intensely well connected.

0:28:43.727 --> 0:28:47.047
<v Speaker 3>Yes, so I think it took because you can look

0:28:47.047 --> 0:28:50.687
<v Speaker 3>at this case and go, what does Blake Lively want?

0:28:50.727 --> 0:28:52.927
<v Speaker 3>This isn't going to be about damages. This isn't about

0:28:52.967 --> 0:28:56.887
<v Speaker 3>sending Justin Baldoni to jail, like, nothing about that.

0:28:57.087 --> 0:28:57.647
<v Speaker 1>Not criminal.

0:28:57.807 --> 0:29:01.047
<v Speaker 3>She wants to correct the record. And in order you

0:29:01.127 --> 0:29:02.847
<v Speaker 3>need to have power, and you need to have the

0:29:02.887 --> 0:29:05.967
<v Speaker 3>financial means, and she does. And I think that's why

0:29:06.007 --> 0:29:11.047
<v Speaker 3>she's doing it because imagine how many actresses have been

0:29:11.087 --> 0:29:13.887
<v Speaker 3>buried and have never been able to tell their story.

0:29:14.367 --> 0:29:14.807
<v Speaker 1>Well, that's the.

0:29:14.847 --> 0:29:17.367
<v Speaker 4>Rule of cancelation, isn't it. You can't defend yourself. Well

0:29:17.367 --> 0:29:20.487
<v Speaker 4>it's happening, otherwise it makes it worse. But the other

0:29:20.567 --> 0:29:24.047
<v Speaker 4>thing to note is that there's a civil complaint. But

0:29:24.247 --> 0:29:28.047
<v Speaker 4>then there's also the New York Times investigation. The lead

0:29:28.087 --> 0:29:31.487
<v Speaker 4>journalist on this was the same journalists that exposed Harvey Weinstein,

0:29:31.607 --> 0:29:35.887
<v Speaker 4>Megan Towey. And they don't just publish what someone else

0:29:36.047 --> 0:29:39.527
<v Speaker 4>wants them to publish. They go and corroborate everything. They

0:29:39.567 --> 0:29:43.087
<v Speaker 4>do their own extensive reporting out making sure that all

0:29:43.127 --> 0:29:46.487
<v Speaker 4>the sources can be confirmed. So in many ways, the

0:29:46.567 --> 0:29:49.567
<v Speaker 4>timing was more about what The New York Times was

0:29:49.647 --> 0:29:51.327
<v Speaker 4>going to do. But the other thing to remember, when

0:29:51.487 --> 0:29:54.687
<v Speaker 4>we're talking about power and money, the guy who is

0:29:54.807 --> 0:29:58.447
<v Speaker 4>the financial backer of Wayfarer, which is the studio that

0:29:58.687 --> 0:30:03.767
<v Speaker 4>Jamie Heath and Justin Baldonia partners in, is like a billionaire.

0:30:04.287 --> 0:30:07.447
<v Speaker 4>So he's also got unlimited funds. He has a lot

0:30:07.447 --> 0:30:10.647
<v Speaker 4>more money than Ryan Reynolds and Blake Lively put together.

0:30:10.727 --> 0:30:14.287
<v Speaker 4>So it's not a case of Blake Lively punching down.

0:30:14.487 --> 0:30:18.207
<v Speaker 4>The complexity of power dynamics on both the set and

0:30:18.287 --> 0:30:21.727
<v Speaker 4>in Hollywood aren't just about who's the most famous in

0:30:21.767 --> 0:30:22.407
<v Speaker 4>the Daily Mail.

0:30:22.887 --> 0:30:26.047
<v Speaker 2>You know what though, and this is a more pragmatic

0:30:26.087 --> 0:30:28.287
<v Speaker 2>reason too, is they let the movie do its thing.

0:30:28.447 --> 0:30:31.887
<v Speaker 2>That movie was really successful, Yeah, you know, so she

0:30:31.927 --> 0:30:35.327
<v Speaker 2>would have been contractually obliged to promote that movie. Also,

0:30:35.407 --> 0:30:38.287
<v Speaker 2>she clearly wanted to, and she didn't want to promote

0:30:38.287 --> 0:30:41.287
<v Speaker 2>it with him, which is again very unusual. But she

0:30:41.487 --> 0:30:44.327
<v Speaker 2>promoted the shit out of that movie while all this

0:30:44.527 --> 0:30:47.687
<v Speaker 2>was going on. It was very successful. It's had its

0:30:47.727 --> 0:30:51.527
<v Speaker 2>period of box office time and now you can sit

0:30:51.527 --> 0:30:53.607
<v Speaker 2>there and reflect on that that was all happening in

0:30:53.647 --> 0:30:56.407
<v Speaker 2>real time to her. It does seem extraordinary to me,

0:30:56.487 --> 0:30:59.607
<v Speaker 2>though I know that Baldoni has very powerful backer their

0:30:59.647 --> 0:31:04.367
<v Speaker 2>me of course, but that he ever thought that they

0:31:04.447 --> 0:31:09.167
<v Speaker 2>weren't going to do this Because Ryan Reynolds, Blake Lively

0:31:10.007 --> 0:31:12.007
<v Speaker 2>Reynolds is one of the most powerful men in Hollywood.

0:31:12.087 --> 0:31:14.887
<v Speaker 2>Deadpool was the second biggest movie of the year. He

0:31:14.967 --> 0:31:16.527
<v Speaker 2>makes a lot of people a lot of money. They

0:31:16.527 --> 0:31:21.087
<v Speaker 2>are intensely powerful. He would be furious. Imagine sitting in

0:31:21.087 --> 0:31:23.447
<v Speaker 2>that meeting that he sat in with his wife and

0:31:23.527 --> 0:31:26.807
<v Speaker 2>all those people and literally listening to that list being

0:31:26.847 --> 0:31:29.007
<v Speaker 2>read out about them walking in on her when she's

0:31:29.047 --> 0:31:32.327
<v Speaker 2>half naked and breastfeeding in her trailer. Revenge is a

0:31:32.407 --> 0:31:35.687
<v Speaker 2>dish best served cold, right. Those guys have gone and

0:31:35.727 --> 0:31:38.127
<v Speaker 2>got their ducks in a row in a very professional,

0:31:38.847 --> 0:31:41.647
<v Speaker 2>very organized manner, and now they're coming for them. And

0:31:42.487 --> 0:31:45.487
<v Speaker 2>fair enough, if indeed everything that's in that legal letter

0:31:45.727 --> 0:31:48.007
<v Speaker 2>is true, absolutely fair enough.

0:31:48.327 --> 0:31:50.567
<v Speaker 4>So what are our takeaways before we wrap up and

0:31:50.687 --> 0:31:52.087
<v Speaker 4>actually go on holidays.

0:31:52.367 --> 0:31:55.687
<v Speaker 3>I think the reason why people are so fascinated by

0:31:55.687 --> 0:31:59.087
<v Speaker 3>this is because it's an exercise in perspective, but also

0:31:59.887 --> 0:32:04.887
<v Speaker 3>we were used as audiences and consumers of media. We

0:32:04.887 --> 0:32:08.927
<v Speaker 3>were played. And the other thing is that I am

0:32:08.967 --> 0:32:14.967
<v Speaker 3>now looking at other examples of cancelation. I'm sorry, but well,

0:32:15.007 --> 0:32:18.327
<v Speaker 3>actually there are some examples of men. But what's confusing

0:32:18.407 --> 0:32:22.287
<v Speaker 3>about them are I don't know who benefited. So it's

0:32:22.407 --> 0:32:24.767
<v Speaker 3>really important when you look at a cancelation like this

0:32:25.287 --> 0:32:27.607
<v Speaker 3>to see who the winners are. But it makes me

0:32:27.727 --> 0:32:33.087
<v Speaker 3>think very differently about Megan Markle. I just wonder when

0:32:33.167 --> 0:32:36.327
<v Speaker 3>you see Walter all and wheneverone walks around and they

0:32:36.327 --> 0:32:38.287
<v Speaker 3>go I just have a sense of something. I have

0:32:38.327 --> 0:32:41.567
<v Speaker 3>a sense that they're not very nice or something.

0:32:41.607 --> 0:32:42.567
<v Speaker 1>It's a great point.

0:32:42.847 --> 0:32:45.887
<v Speaker 3>It just makes me go, how much of this is

0:32:45.927 --> 0:32:49.607
<v Speaker 3>all manufactured? And how difficult is it to prove when

0:32:49.607 --> 0:32:54.167
<v Speaker 3>these social media wizards are so much smarter than us.

0:32:54.607 --> 0:32:57.127
<v Speaker 4>So out loud as we will be returning to our

0:32:57.327 --> 0:33:00.407
<v Speaker 4>scheduled programming of hot Pods summer, where we are going

0:33:00.447 --> 0:33:02.607
<v Speaker 4>to be giving you all sorts of delicious things to

0:33:02.647 --> 0:33:04.327
<v Speaker 4>listen to over summer.

0:33:04.967 --> 0:33:07.207
<v Speaker 1>If only you could see us. Now it's early in

0:33:07.287 --> 0:33:09.407
<v Speaker 1>the morning, we are all at home.

0:33:09.807 --> 0:33:12.567
<v Speaker 4>But we really wanted to bring this to you because

0:33:13.247 --> 0:33:15.927
<v Speaker 4>we just thought that it was an important story to cover.

0:33:16.247 --> 0:33:18.927
<v Speaker 3>It was one of those stories that in terms of

0:33:18.927 --> 0:33:21.447
<v Speaker 3>the group chat, it was just going off. Look, chances

0:33:21.487 --> 0:33:23.847
<v Speaker 3>are in two days there'll be another story that blows

0:33:23.927 --> 0:33:25.847
<v Speaker 3>up our group chat and we're like, let's jump on.

0:33:26.527 --> 0:33:29.407
<v Speaker 3>But this time of year, I think we all tend

0:33:29.447 --> 0:33:32.487
<v Speaker 3>to fall into some rabbit holes, and it appears that

0:33:32.567 --> 0:33:33.447
<v Speaker 3>we were.

0:33:33.367 --> 0:33:34.007
<v Speaker 1>Victims of that.

0:33:34.487 --> 0:33:37.007
<v Speaker 2>If this conversation has brought anything up for you, help

0:33:37.087 --> 0:33:39.247
<v Speaker 2>is available. We're going to put links to resources that

0:33:39.287 --> 0:33:40.567
<v Speaker 2>can help in the show notes.

0:33:40.727 --> 0:33:43.527
<v Speaker 1>Take care, I'm going outside to touch some grass. We

0:33:43.647 --> 0:33:46.807
<v Speaker 1>love you out louders. We will be in your ears shortly.

0:33:47.287 --> 0:33:52.647
<v Speaker 3>Bye bye bye