1 00:00:10,327 --> 00:00:13,047 Speaker 1: You're listening to a MoMA Mia podcast. 2 00:00:13,727 --> 00:00:16,767 Speaker 2: Mamma Mere acknowledges the traditional owners of land and waters 3 00:00:16,807 --> 00:00:26,247 Speaker 2: that this podcast is recorded on Hello out louders. It's Monday, 4 00:00:26,327 --> 00:00:29,367 Speaker 2: the twenty third of December, and I'm Holly Wainwright, I'm 5 00:00:29,407 --> 00:00:30,767 Speaker 2: me of Friedman, and. 6 00:00:30,687 --> 00:00:33,407 Speaker 3: I'm Jesse Stevens. And we were not meant to be 7 00:00:33,607 --> 00:00:35,887 Speaker 3: here right now, but alas. 8 00:00:35,967 --> 00:00:40,607 Speaker 2: We are here because we can bury anyone inside a 9 00:00:40,647 --> 00:00:44,447 Speaker 2: Hollywood smear machine. That is the New York Times headline. 10 00:00:44,527 --> 00:00:47,367 Speaker 2: That meant we definitely had to be here right now, 11 00:00:47,447 --> 00:00:51,887 Speaker 2: Jesse Stevens, because you might remember, you definitely remember bits 12 00:00:51,887 --> 00:00:53,447 Speaker 2: of it. It was one of the stories of the 13 00:00:53,527 --> 00:00:56,607 Speaker 2: year that one of the most watched movies of twenty 14 00:00:56,647 --> 00:01:00,487 Speaker 2: twenty four, It Ends with Us, came alongside the mass 15 00:01:00,567 --> 00:01:05,127 Speaker 2: cancelation of its star, Blake Lively. The prestore that accompanied 16 00:01:05,127 --> 00:01:07,527 Speaker 2: that movie was notable for the fact that the star 17 00:01:07,727 --> 00:01:12,407 Speaker 2: and producer Lively and its other star and director, Justin Baldoni, 18 00:01:12,527 --> 00:01:16,007 Speaker 2: went to great and unusual lengths not to be seen together, 19 00:01:16,367 --> 00:01:19,127 Speaker 2: to be interviewed together, to show any of the usual 20 00:01:19,167 --> 00:01:23,607 Speaker 2: camaraderie required of co creators of a big film. Lively 21 00:01:23,887 --> 00:01:26,807 Speaker 2: the rumors went wanted to promote the movie as if 22 00:01:26,807 --> 00:01:32,207 Speaker 2: it were a flowery rom com. Baldoni supposedly loudly insisted 23 00:01:32,207 --> 00:01:35,367 Speaker 2: that he wanted its serious subject matter coercive control and 24 00:01:35,407 --> 00:01:39,847 Speaker 2: domestic violence, to be front and center. Lively was criticized 25 00:01:39,887 --> 00:01:43,127 Speaker 2: for trivializing a serious topic, for being a tone death 26 00:01:43,247 --> 00:01:48,527 Speaker 2: self promoter, for launching a haircare brand. The backlash was huge, 27 00:01:48,567 --> 00:01:51,967 Speaker 2: and then yesterday The New York Times reported that Lively 28 00:01:52,087 --> 00:01:55,927 Speaker 2: is taking legal action against Baldoni, accusing him of sexual 29 00:01:55,927 --> 00:01:59,687 Speaker 2: harassment and an effort to destroy her reputation. It's a 30 00:01:59,767 --> 00:02:04,127 Speaker 2: story that has massive implications for I'd say almost every 31 00:02:04,167 --> 00:02:07,607 Speaker 2: celebrity story you see on the internet. Mia, what did 32 00:02:07,647 --> 00:02:10,487 Speaker 2: the story the one with the we can bury anyone 33 00:02:10,567 --> 00:02:11,887 Speaker 2: headline allege? 34 00:02:12,247 --> 00:02:14,367 Speaker 4: I think Jesse's going to take us through some of 35 00:02:14,407 --> 00:02:19,447 Speaker 4: the allegations in more detail, but overall, it alleged serious 36 00:02:19,527 --> 00:02:22,447 Speaker 4: misconduct on the set. Now, what's important to understand is 37 00:02:22,447 --> 00:02:26,367 Speaker 4: that Justin was not only the director and the producer 38 00:02:26,527 --> 00:02:29,367 Speaker 4: and the co star. He also was a co owner 39 00:02:29,407 --> 00:02:32,447 Speaker 4: of the studio that was making the film. So even 40 00:02:32,487 --> 00:02:36,687 Speaker 4: though Blake Lively was more famous, he had huge power 41 00:02:36,767 --> 00:02:39,967 Speaker 4: in the context of making this film, so it alleged 42 00:02:40,207 --> 00:02:44,447 Speaker 4: sexual harassment, and then also it detailed that when Blake 43 00:02:44,527 --> 00:02:47,887 Speaker 4: Lively complained about it and insisted on a meeting with 44 00:02:47,967 --> 00:02:51,447 Speaker 4: all the stakeholders before she returned to filming in January 45 00:02:51,447 --> 00:02:55,007 Speaker 4: this year, after the writers' strike, Justin Baldoni hired a 46 00:02:55,007 --> 00:02:57,687 Speaker 4: crisis pr to smear her, which we're also going to 47 00:02:57,687 --> 00:03:00,007 Speaker 4: get into in a moment, but let's just rewind to 48 00:03:00,047 --> 00:03:02,487 Speaker 4: August to remind ourselves what this movie was about and 49 00:03:02,487 --> 00:03:04,927 Speaker 4: why there was so much controversy when it was released, 50 00:03:05,007 --> 00:03:08,007 Speaker 4: because it was only released a few months ago, and 51 00:03:08,367 --> 00:03:10,527 Speaker 4: it's about to come on streaming, or I think it's 52 00:03:10,607 --> 00:03:13,487 Speaker 4: just come on to streaming. The movie is based on 53 00:03:13,607 --> 00:03:16,847 Speaker 4: the Colleen Hoover book that was also called It Ends 54 00:03:16,847 --> 00:03:18,727 Speaker 4: with Us, and it tells the story of a florist 55 00:03:18,847 --> 00:03:23,407 Speaker 4: called Lily Bloom played by Lively, who navigates the romance 56 00:03:23,527 --> 00:03:28,887 Speaker 4: with a neurosurgeon called Ryle Kincaid that becomes abusive. 57 00:03:29,127 --> 00:03:30,687 Speaker 1: That's the essence of the film. 58 00:03:30,727 --> 00:03:32,887 Speaker 4: The three of us went to see it, it was 59 00:03:32,927 --> 00:03:37,007 Speaker 4: already completely swamped in controversy. I really liked the film. 60 00:03:37,087 --> 00:03:40,367 Speaker 4: I thought Blake Lively was fantastic. Yeah, I thought it 61 00:03:40,407 --> 00:03:41,727 Speaker 4: was not the best film in the world, but I 62 00:03:41,727 --> 00:03:45,167 Speaker 4: thought it was really good. And I was surprised at 63 00:03:45,207 --> 00:03:48,847 Speaker 4: the controversy that had completely engulfed this film. It seemed 64 00:03:48,887 --> 00:03:52,927 Speaker 4: really out of whack. So what was the controversy. Well, 65 00:03:52,967 --> 00:03:55,367 Speaker 4: there's a few different elements to it, but it was 66 00:03:55,407 --> 00:04:01,847 Speaker 4: basically all about Blake Lively being inappropriate during the promotional 67 00:04:02,087 --> 00:04:04,087 Speaker 4: part of the tour, So it wasn't about the actual 68 00:04:04,127 --> 00:04:07,167 Speaker 4: movie itself, it was about how it was promoted. There 69 00:04:07,207 --> 00:04:11,087 Speaker 4: was an interview where she encouraged fans to grab your friends, 70 00:04:11,127 --> 00:04:13,647 Speaker 4: wear your florals, and head out to see it, which 71 00:04:13,727 --> 00:04:17,087 Speaker 4: kind of suggested that it was a lighthearted viewing experience. 72 00:04:17,487 --> 00:04:19,807 Speaker 4: There was no trigger warning at the beginning of it, 73 00:04:19,887 --> 00:04:22,127 Speaker 4: so there was a whole big debate about trigger warnings, 74 00:04:22,847 --> 00:04:26,847 Speaker 4: and the whole marketing campaign was criticized as tone deaf 75 00:04:27,367 --> 00:04:30,447 Speaker 4: given how serious the themes were in the movie about 76 00:04:30,487 --> 00:04:34,287 Speaker 4: domestic abuse, and that all landed on Blake Lively. Now, 77 00:04:34,367 --> 00:04:36,167 Speaker 4: there were some things she did during the tour that 78 00:04:36,367 --> 00:04:39,527 Speaker 4: particularly made her a target of criticism, like she was 79 00:04:39,607 --> 00:04:42,287 Speaker 4: launching a hair care line at the time. She also 80 00:04:42,407 --> 00:04:46,607 Speaker 4: promoted her beverage brand, which was called Betty booze, and 81 00:04:47,167 --> 00:04:50,407 Speaker 4: many people said that alcohol is often connected with domestic violence, 82 00:04:50,407 --> 00:04:54,247 Speaker 4: so that's insensitive, and so it was seen that she 83 00:04:54,407 --> 00:04:57,727 Speaker 4: was just not taking it seriously, which led to this 84 00:04:57,847 --> 00:05:02,607 Speaker 4: big backlash against her. And you'd have to say one 85 00:05:02,607 --> 00:05:07,007 Speaker 4: of the worst cancelations that we've seen in a long 86 00:05:07,047 --> 00:05:11,407 Speaker 4: time for reasons that it seemed really spurious. 87 00:05:11,887 --> 00:05:15,487 Speaker 3: Yes, I agree, because back at the time we talked 88 00:05:15,487 --> 00:05:18,367 Speaker 3: about it, and it felt as though the facts we 89 00:05:18,407 --> 00:05:21,567 Speaker 3: had in front of us were not proportionate to the 90 00:05:21,847 --> 00:05:27,007 Speaker 3: avalanche of hate that Blake Lively was getting, particularly on TikTok. 91 00:05:27,087 --> 00:05:30,127 Speaker 3: Maybe that's because that's where I leave most of the time, 92 00:05:30,767 --> 00:05:33,647 Speaker 3: and we were getting these leaks. So the leaks that 93 00:05:33,687 --> 00:05:36,607 Speaker 3: we were getting were that there was something that said 94 00:05:36,687 --> 00:05:40,367 Speaker 3: justin Baldoni lingered too long on a kiss, He asked 95 00:05:40,407 --> 00:05:44,087 Speaker 3: how much she weighed because he had a former back 96 00:05:44,127 --> 00:05:46,607 Speaker 3: injury and was worried about picking her up like weird, 97 00:05:47,127 --> 00:05:47,887 Speaker 3: weird stuff. 98 00:05:48,247 --> 00:05:50,127 Speaker 4: None of those took hold, so there were a few 99 00:05:50,207 --> 00:05:53,447 Speaker 4: rumors of was it uncomfortable on set. The other thing 100 00:05:53,487 --> 00:05:58,007 Speaker 4: that really came out was Blake had taken over and 101 00:05:58,367 --> 00:06:02,167 Speaker 4: she'd insisted on doing her own edit that somehow Ryan 102 00:06:02,207 --> 00:06:04,567 Speaker 4: Reynolds got involved and was rewriting a few scenes. 103 00:06:04,607 --> 00:06:07,207 Speaker 1: So the image that came across through the press tour 104 00:06:07,727 --> 00:06:09,087 Speaker 1: was that she was. 105 00:06:09,647 --> 00:06:14,407 Speaker 4: Not taking it seriously, was dominating an a diva on set, 106 00:06:15,007 --> 00:06:18,287 Speaker 4: and that he was a victim of all this. Because, 107 00:06:18,407 --> 00:06:20,607 Speaker 4: in case you're not familiar with Justin Baldoni, his most 108 00:06:20,607 --> 00:06:23,407 Speaker 4: famous role as an actor was in Jane the Virgin, 109 00:06:24,087 --> 00:06:27,767 Speaker 4: and he's really fushioned himself over the last few years 110 00:06:27,807 --> 00:06:31,607 Speaker 4: as a feminist and as he has a podcast called 111 00:06:31,687 --> 00:06:34,527 Speaker 4: Man Enough where he questions toxic masculinity. 112 00:06:35,007 --> 00:06:37,687 Speaker 2: He had a viral ted talk about it like he's 113 00:06:37,807 --> 00:06:39,247 Speaker 2: very much he's that. 114 00:06:39,207 --> 00:06:42,207 Speaker 1: Guy, a champion of women. That was his vibe. 115 00:06:42,367 --> 00:06:44,967 Speaker 2: And among all these rumors, what was very clear the 116 00:06:45,007 --> 00:06:49,367 Speaker 2: whole like smoke fire thing, is that they had definitely 117 00:06:49,447 --> 00:06:52,407 Speaker 2: fallen out, Like there was no question about that. You know, 118 00:06:52,487 --> 00:06:55,527 Speaker 2: the other cast members had stopped following him on Instagram 119 00:06:55,527 --> 00:06:57,967 Speaker 2: and seemed to very much be siding with her. As 120 00:06:58,007 --> 00:07:00,047 Speaker 2: I said at the beginning, they weren't photographed together, they 121 00:07:00,047 --> 00:07:02,567 Speaker 2: didn't do any promo. It was kind of like jeweling 122 00:07:03,047 --> 00:07:04,887 Speaker 2: press tours, which is very unusual. 123 00:07:05,007 --> 00:07:08,927 Speaker 3: And Baldoni at the time he spoke to Today and 124 00:07:09,007 --> 00:07:12,807 Speaker 3: of addressing some of the creative differences, and he said, 125 00:07:13,287 --> 00:07:16,207 Speaker 3: I'm a best idea wins person and I always have 126 00:07:16,327 --> 00:07:18,447 Speaker 3: been to a fault, sometimes to a point where at 127 00:07:18,487 --> 00:07:20,327 Speaker 3: times I think I've had people wonder if I know 128 00:07:20,407 --> 00:07:22,367 Speaker 3: what I'm doing or if I have a point of view, 129 00:07:22,567 --> 00:07:25,607 Speaker 3: because I'm so willing to have my vision changed. I 130 00:07:25,607 --> 00:07:29,327 Speaker 3: don't believe that inspiration or creativity comes through one person. 131 00:07:29,727 --> 00:07:31,887 Speaker 3: On the night of the premiere, he was saying, this 132 00:07:31,967 --> 00:07:34,887 Speaker 3: isn't about me, It's a night for Blake, It's for Colleen. 133 00:07:35,607 --> 00:07:38,727 Speaker 3: I'm so grateful we're here, and again it was clear 134 00:07:38,767 --> 00:07:41,527 Speaker 3: that neither of those women were speaking to him. 135 00:07:42,127 --> 00:07:44,527 Speaker 2: What happened on the weekend is that Blake Lively has 136 00:07:44,527 --> 00:07:47,207 Speaker 2: filed a legal complaint that presents her side of the 137 00:07:47,247 --> 00:07:50,087 Speaker 2: story to all of the things that we were just discussing, 138 00:07:50,127 --> 00:07:52,127 Speaker 2: and Jesse's going to tell us about them in a minute, 139 00:07:52,207 --> 00:07:53,327 Speaker 2: but first short break. 140 00:08:01,407 --> 00:08:06,327 Speaker 3: So the allegations of misconduct on set are pretty damning 141 00:08:06,487 --> 00:08:11,527 Speaker 3: in terms of physical boundaries and relations. There are allegations 142 00:08:11,607 --> 00:08:15,847 Speaker 3: that he improvised unwanted kissing scenes. He would enter this 143 00:08:15,967 --> 00:08:19,127 Speaker 3: is Baldoni would enter her makeup trailer uninvited, while she 144 00:08:19,167 --> 00:08:23,367 Speaker 3: was undressed, including while she was breastfeeding. In terms of 145 00:08:23,407 --> 00:08:28,367 Speaker 3: sexual harassment, Baldoni and Jamie Heath, he was a producer 146 00:08:28,367 --> 00:08:32,647 Speaker 3: and co owner. There are allegations that they would describe 147 00:08:32,687 --> 00:08:36,527 Speaker 3: their genitalia on set. Baldoni would frequently refer to his 148 00:08:36,687 --> 00:08:40,927 Speaker 3: past porn addiction and describe previous sexual encounters where he 149 00:08:41,047 --> 00:08:45,447 Speaker 3: said he may or may not have received consent. Now 150 00:08:45,487 --> 00:08:48,767 Speaker 3: we know that Lively made a series of requests. Part 151 00:08:48,767 --> 00:08:52,247 Speaker 3: way through filming. They actually had this all hands meeting 152 00:08:52,327 --> 00:08:56,327 Speaker 3: which included her husband, Ryan Reynolds, and it was held 153 00:08:56,367 --> 00:09:01,087 Speaker 3: to address Baldoni and Jamie Heath's alleged inappropriate conduct. 154 00:09:01,287 --> 00:09:04,487 Speaker 4: So, yeah, this was interesting because this was like she 155 00:09:04,607 --> 00:09:08,247 Speaker 4: had Ryan there as her support person, and it was 156 00:09:08,287 --> 00:09:10,447 Speaker 4: after the Writer's strike, so they'd only been filming for 157 00:09:10,487 --> 00:09:12,807 Speaker 4: six weeks. Then that was the writer's strike and she 158 00:09:12,887 --> 00:09:14,887 Speaker 4: had this meeting and she said, I'm not coming back 159 00:09:15,607 --> 00:09:18,767 Speaker 4: unless we have this meeting. She included Sony who's the distributor, 160 00:09:18,767 --> 00:09:20,687 Speaker 4: and all these different people, So there are a lot 161 00:09:20,727 --> 00:09:22,767 Speaker 4: of people at that meeting, which means that there will 162 00:09:22,807 --> 00:09:25,047 Speaker 4: be a lot of you know, and none of this 163 00:09:25,527 --> 00:09:26,967 Speaker 4: was disputed at the time. 164 00:09:27,207 --> 00:09:30,847 Speaker 3: So there was a list of thirty things. They're quite 165 00:09:30,887 --> 00:09:34,607 Speaker 3: revealing some of Lively's requests, and these were, as you say, 166 00:09:34,647 --> 00:09:37,887 Speaker 3: they were confirmed because it's a document. Her requests were 167 00:09:37,927 --> 00:09:41,647 Speaker 3: that Baldoni would stop asking her about religious beliefs, stop 168 00:09:41,727 --> 00:09:44,727 Speaker 3: asking her trainer about her weight she was four months 169 00:09:44,807 --> 00:09:48,127 Speaker 3: postpartum with her fourth baby, and stop claiming to be 170 00:09:48,207 --> 00:09:52,367 Speaker 3: able to speak to her dead father. There are allegations 171 00:09:52,367 --> 00:09:56,047 Speaker 3: that Baldoni improvised while on set, so in one scene, 172 00:09:56,207 --> 00:09:58,767 Speaker 3: they weren't miked up. It was just to be filmed. 173 00:09:58,767 --> 00:10:01,727 Speaker 3: It was just a visual scene, and Lively claims that 174 00:10:01,807 --> 00:10:05,727 Speaker 3: as himself, Baldoni leaned in and slowly dragged his lips 175 00:10:05,767 --> 00:10:08,487 Speaker 3: from her ear to her neck and said, it smells 176 00:10:08,527 --> 00:10:12,767 Speaker 3: so good. It says that when Lively objected to his actions, 177 00:10:13,167 --> 00:10:18,687 Speaker 3: Baldoni retorted, I'm not even attracted to you. Baldoni added, 178 00:10:18,767 --> 00:10:22,887 Speaker 3: this is an allegation improvised sexual content and nude scenes, 179 00:10:23,047 --> 00:10:25,527 Speaker 3: and he fought to have a scene where the characters 180 00:10:25,567 --> 00:10:28,167 Speaker 3: climaxed at the same time on their wedding night, and 181 00:10:28,247 --> 00:10:31,607 Speaker 3: told Lively that he and his partner always did, and 182 00:10:31,647 --> 00:10:34,567 Speaker 3: allegedly pressed her on whether that was the case with 183 00:10:34,727 --> 00:10:37,767 Speaker 3: her husband. And she says she was very uncomfortable by 184 00:10:37,767 --> 00:10:42,887 Speaker 3: that conversation. There's an allegation about the childbirth scene, which 185 00:10:42,927 --> 00:10:46,367 Speaker 3: is particularly unsettling. It wasn't agreed that she would be 186 00:10:46,487 --> 00:10:48,287 Speaker 3: naked for it, but then when she got on set, 187 00:10:48,367 --> 00:10:52,247 Speaker 3: she says that he insisted she be naked. They compromised 188 00:10:52,647 --> 00:10:55,327 Speaker 3: that she would be naked from the waist down, but 189 00:10:55,887 --> 00:10:59,607 Speaker 3: the set wasn't closed and in the end his friend 190 00:10:59,767 --> 00:11:02,527 Speaker 3: came in to play the role of the obgyn. 191 00:11:02,927 --> 00:11:05,887 Speaker 4: I think this is possibly the most chilling thing because 192 00:11:05,927 --> 00:11:08,527 Speaker 4: what's so illuminating about reading will link to it if 193 00:11:08,607 --> 00:11:11,367 Speaker 4: anybody wants to look at it, which I think you should. 194 00:11:11,527 --> 00:11:14,567 Speaker 4: But you learn a lot about Hollywood and how sex 195 00:11:14,607 --> 00:11:17,327 Speaker 4: scenes work right, and there are things like nudity writers 196 00:11:17,367 --> 00:11:21,287 Speaker 4: where everybody agrees what the parameters before. 197 00:11:21,047 --> 00:11:22,087 Speaker 1: You go into a scene. 198 00:11:22,087 --> 00:11:25,407 Speaker 4: Things like closed sets when there's nudity, so only essential 199 00:11:25,407 --> 00:11:28,327 Speaker 4: people are there, Monitors are turned off so other people 200 00:11:28,367 --> 00:11:30,767 Speaker 4: can't look from other rooms and even film you. 201 00:11:31,287 --> 00:11:32,607 Speaker 1: So she was in stirrups. 202 00:11:32,647 --> 00:11:35,487 Speaker 4: She had a little bit of fabric just literally covering 203 00:11:35,487 --> 00:11:39,127 Speaker 4: her and the role of the gynecologist. They were like 204 00:11:39,167 --> 00:11:43,967 Speaker 4: between her legs and also another owner of his studio 205 00:11:44,087 --> 00:11:46,887 Speaker 4: Wayfair had just flown in to visit the set on 206 00:11:46,967 --> 00:11:50,127 Speaker 4: that day for the first time, like it is so 207 00:11:50,887 --> 00:11:51,967 Speaker 4: gross and creepy. 208 00:11:52,527 --> 00:11:56,207 Speaker 2: It also is clearly from this very long list of 209 00:11:56,327 --> 00:12:00,247 Speaker 2: requests clear that this set was a shit show, right 210 00:12:00,287 --> 00:12:04,007 Speaker 2: because one of them is also stop having hours long 211 00:12:04,127 --> 00:12:09,607 Speaker 2: meetings where Baldoni cries and no more pressing from Baldly 212 00:12:09,767 --> 00:12:14,687 Speaker 2: to sage any of Blake Live's employees, like this is 213 00:12:14,727 --> 00:12:17,327 Speaker 2: batshit what's going on on that set, And it seems 214 00:12:17,327 --> 00:12:19,367 Speaker 2: that she's very much trying to say, let's get back 215 00:12:19,367 --> 00:12:21,207 Speaker 2: to a professional set. 216 00:12:21,407 --> 00:12:23,407 Speaker 3: And they're at claims as well that when you know 217 00:12:23,447 --> 00:12:26,127 Speaker 3: there were certain moments where Lively was made to feel uncomfortable, 218 00:12:26,167 --> 00:12:28,847 Speaker 3: other women from the set came up and said, I've 219 00:12:28,847 --> 00:12:32,047 Speaker 3: also had that experience. So the allegations are that it 220 00:12:32,207 --> 00:12:34,327 Speaker 3: was not just her, she was trying to protect the 221 00:12:34,327 --> 00:12:36,727 Speaker 3: whole set. The last thing I'll say, and I. 222 00:12:36,687 --> 00:12:38,607 Speaker 1: Could go on and on about what's in this. 223 00:12:38,727 --> 00:12:42,767 Speaker 3: Complaint, but the last thing is she alleges that there 224 00:12:42,887 --> 00:12:47,727 Speaker 3: was a clear marketing plan that was distributed to the 225 00:12:47,807 --> 00:12:51,367 Speaker 3: cast and everyone involved in marketing it about how to 226 00:12:51,407 --> 00:12:54,047 Speaker 3: promote the film. This was from Sony and they said 227 00:12:54,407 --> 00:12:57,087 Speaker 3: they wanted to focus on hope and resilience and not 228 00:12:57,247 --> 00:13:00,927 Speaker 3: position this as a domestic violence film. They say that 229 00:13:01,007 --> 00:13:05,607 Speaker 3: Baldoni went against this, and that's massive because at the 230 00:13:05,647 --> 00:13:09,567 Speaker 3: time everyone was going, why is she not acknowledged that 231 00:13:09,607 --> 00:13:12,647 Speaker 3: this is a film about domestic violence. Baldoni was over 232 00:13:12,687 --> 00:13:16,767 Speaker 3: here with a link in his Instagram bio to help victims. 233 00:13:17,167 --> 00:13:21,367 Speaker 3: Everything he said in his messaging was acknowledging victims, and 234 00:13:21,447 --> 00:13:24,247 Speaker 3: this made Lively look really bad. 235 00:13:24,967 --> 00:13:27,127 Speaker 2: Well, as it turns out, or at least what's alleged 236 00:13:27,167 --> 00:13:30,927 Speaker 2: here is that that pivot Jesse was a very deliberate 237 00:13:30,927 --> 00:13:35,407 Speaker 2: one to smear Blake Lively because Baldoni and his team 238 00:13:35,567 --> 00:13:39,007 Speaker 2: knew what was coming. So to the smear campaign and 239 00:13:39,047 --> 00:13:41,847 Speaker 2: why I say that this is a story that's not 240 00:13:41,887 --> 00:13:44,247 Speaker 2: just about Blake Lively and just In Baldoni, but gives 241 00:13:44,407 --> 00:13:48,047 Speaker 2: an insight into what is really behind a lot of 242 00:13:48,047 --> 00:13:51,007 Speaker 2: what we believe right on social media. So all those 243 00:13:51,047 --> 00:13:53,127 Speaker 2: tiktoks and stories that we talked about at the beginning 244 00:13:53,167 --> 00:13:56,207 Speaker 2: that were being shared and reshared as facts that Lively 245 00:13:56,327 --> 00:13:59,207 Speaker 2: was a mean girl, that Lively tried to hijack the movie, 246 00:13:59,727 --> 00:14:02,767 Speaker 2: that Lively just wanted to promote a haircare brand. What's 247 00:14:02,807 --> 00:14:06,207 Speaker 2: alleged in this document is there was nothing organic about 248 00:14:06,247 --> 00:14:10,087 Speaker 2: those stories, and that the PR firm hired by when 249 00:14:10,087 --> 00:14:14,967 Speaker 2: he realized that Reynolds had blocked him on Instagram, Baldonian, 250 00:14:15,047 --> 00:14:18,167 Speaker 2: his producing partner, hired this firm who were expert in 251 00:14:18,247 --> 00:14:21,607 Speaker 2: the dark arts of smearing, starting rumors and fanning the 252 00:14:21,647 --> 00:14:24,967 Speaker 2: flames of negativity. Some of the tactics that are alleged 253 00:14:24,967 --> 00:14:28,527 Speaker 2: to have happened are that the PR team would boost 254 00:14:28,607 --> 00:14:32,447 Speaker 2: negative stories about Lively, branding her as difficult and tone deaf. 255 00:14:32,927 --> 00:14:36,527 Speaker 2: That contractors were allegedly hired to dominate social media with 256 00:14:36,607 --> 00:14:42,367 Speaker 2: untraceable tactics like social manipulation and proactive fan posting. A 257 00:14:42,487 --> 00:14:46,527 Speaker 2: hired gun helped amplify negative narratives online, including on platforms 258 00:14:46,567 --> 00:14:50,887 Speaker 2: like TikTok and Reddit, and basically all these threads of 259 00:14:51,007 --> 00:14:54,847 Speaker 2: theories started being sown and then amplified. Now it's actually 260 00:14:54,887 --> 00:14:58,087 Speaker 2: impossible even by the investigative journalists at the New York 261 00:14:58,087 --> 00:15:01,487 Speaker 2: Times and actually by the legal team, to be able 262 00:15:01,527 --> 00:15:05,807 Speaker 2: to absolutely identify exactly what the amplification did. As we know, 263 00:15:05,847 --> 00:15:09,087 Speaker 2: the Internet is sprawling and enormous. But the negative stories 264 00:15:09,087 --> 00:15:13,887 Speaker 2: that were planted, were planted very deliberately and then encouraged. 265 00:15:14,047 --> 00:15:17,527 Speaker 2: So this tells you everything about how we the public 266 00:15:18,007 --> 00:15:20,247 Speaker 2: were manipulated in this story. 267 00:15:20,647 --> 00:15:23,447 Speaker 3: In August, there were two things we talked about. The 268 00:15:23,527 --> 00:15:26,847 Speaker 3: first was something that we've referred to as the dig, 269 00:15:27,287 --> 00:15:29,567 Speaker 3: which is what happens when someone is in the process 270 00:15:29,607 --> 00:15:33,527 Speaker 3: of cancelation, and we were saying that it's again back 271 00:15:33,527 --> 00:15:37,087 Speaker 3: to it being disproportionate. Is that people started yelling about 272 00:15:37,087 --> 00:15:42,727 Speaker 3: her plantation wedding, about how Reynolds cheated on Scarlet your 273 00:15:42,767 --> 00:15:46,567 Speaker 3: Hansen with Lively, how she's always been rude. Everyone on 274 00:15:46,607 --> 00:15:50,207 Speaker 3: Gossip Girl hated her. There were weird videos of people 275 00:15:50,407 --> 00:15:52,607 Speaker 3: gifting her a bracelet on a red carpet and she 276 00:15:52,607 --> 00:15:54,927 Speaker 3: would not accept it, or something like. 277 00:15:55,007 --> 00:15:57,847 Speaker 4: The one that got the most traction was and I 278 00:15:57,887 --> 00:16:00,847 Speaker 4: remember thinking at the time, this is weird. Without wanting to, 279 00:16:01,207 --> 00:16:03,487 Speaker 4: we definitely had our doubts and we spoke about this 280 00:16:03,567 --> 00:16:08,367 Speaker 4: on the show, as did others. That interview with a 281 00:16:08,527 --> 00:16:12,807 Speaker 4: Swedish journal last entertainment journalist called Christie Flaher which came 282 00:16:12,847 --> 00:16:15,447 Speaker 4: out where it showed her interviewing Blake Lively for a 283 00:16:15,447 --> 00:16:19,687 Speaker 4: different movie. I think back in twenty fifteen, and it 284 00:16:19,807 --> 00:16:23,407 Speaker 4: showed Blake being a little bit rude, and for some 285 00:16:23,527 --> 00:16:26,447 Speaker 4: reason she posted that with the headline the interview that 286 00:16:26,487 --> 00:16:29,847 Speaker 4: made me want to quit my job. That was in 287 00:16:29,887 --> 00:16:33,807 Speaker 4: twenty sixteen. That interview happened, and yet it came out. 288 00:16:34,447 --> 00:16:37,167 Speaker 4: Now why did it come out? Well, you could say 289 00:16:37,167 --> 00:16:40,647 Speaker 4: that organically that journalist was just trying to ride the 290 00:16:40,647 --> 00:16:43,967 Speaker 4: wave of hate against Blake Lively. But what was revealed 291 00:16:43,967 --> 00:16:47,767 Speaker 4: in this was that this journalist had worked with the 292 00:16:47,807 --> 00:16:51,447 Speaker 4: PR company before, because they'd also represented Johnny Depp in 293 00:16:51,487 --> 00:16:55,527 Speaker 4: his trial against Amber Heard. And we know that some 294 00:16:55,567 --> 00:16:59,207 Speaker 4: really dodgy things happened then, in terms of how Amber 295 00:16:59,247 --> 00:17:03,007 Speaker 4: Heard was trolled and the volume of internet hate towards her, 296 00:17:03,687 --> 00:17:07,207 Speaker 4: so much of which was seen to be manufactured. So again, 297 00:17:07,327 --> 00:17:09,847 Speaker 4: it wasn't organic. And there's a word called ASTROI which 298 00:17:09,847 --> 00:17:13,967 Speaker 4: I learned, which is basically means you think something is 299 00:17:14,047 --> 00:17:16,647 Speaker 4: organic it looks like natural grass, but when you look. 300 00:17:16,487 --> 00:17:18,327 Speaker 1: Closer you see that it's artificial. 301 00:17:18,607 --> 00:17:21,607 Speaker 4: And what that means is that these things are planted 302 00:17:21,727 --> 00:17:23,727 Speaker 4: and then amplified. 303 00:17:23,367 --> 00:17:26,447 Speaker 1: Either by bots or by these agencies. That's what they do. 304 00:17:26,727 --> 00:17:29,567 Speaker 3: Yeah, So in terms of being planted, I think That's 305 00:17:29,607 --> 00:17:33,847 Speaker 3: an important point because in the investigation it sort of 306 00:17:33,887 --> 00:17:36,807 Speaker 3: said this isn't bots. I always imagined it was bots. 307 00:17:37,327 --> 00:17:41,367 Speaker 3: But at the time, I was posting on TikTok about 308 00:17:41,367 --> 00:17:44,167 Speaker 3: the Blake Lively thing, and I was noticing that every 309 00:17:44,207 --> 00:17:47,887 Speaker 3: time I posted something that was defensive, it got no reach. 310 00:17:48,047 --> 00:17:50,207 Speaker 3: So I remember talking about this on the show, only 311 00:17:50,407 --> 00:17:53,087 Speaker 3: a few hundred views, and then I posted one thing 312 00:17:53,087 --> 00:17:56,167 Speaker 3: that was cheeky that had like a something about Blake 313 00:17:56,207 --> 00:17:59,367 Speaker 3: Lively's cancelation. It actually went against it, but all the 314 00:17:59,407 --> 00:18:01,607 Speaker 3: metadata would have suggested that I was about to go 315 00:18:01,687 --> 00:18:06,807 Speaker 3: her blew up, and it seemed that if you were 316 00:18:06,847 --> 00:18:11,487 Speaker 3: being critical of Blake Lively, your content was on steroids. 317 00:18:11,807 --> 00:18:14,767 Speaker 3: As someone who consumes a lot of social media content, 318 00:18:14,927 --> 00:18:18,047 Speaker 3: it is not often that you get a unanimous view 319 00:18:18,367 --> 00:18:23,007 Speaker 3: on anything, but you went onto these media platforms and 320 00:18:23,167 --> 00:18:26,927 Speaker 3: all of a sudden, it was like wall to wall. 321 00:18:27,967 --> 00:18:31,687 Speaker 3: Everyone hated her. And let's be clear, if you saw 322 00:18:31,727 --> 00:18:33,887 Speaker 3: someone pop up and have a go at Blake Lively, 323 00:18:34,967 --> 00:18:38,567 Speaker 3: that was probably legitimate. But where they were getting the information, 324 00:18:39,247 --> 00:18:43,087 Speaker 3: how their brain had been marinating in content kind of 325 00:18:43,567 --> 00:18:44,367 Speaker 3: contributed to that. 326 00:18:44,767 --> 00:18:47,327 Speaker 4: Well. It creates a lens, and I should say, Christy 327 00:18:47,407 --> 00:18:49,487 Speaker 4: Flower has come out and said she has nothing to 328 00:18:49,487 --> 00:18:53,567 Speaker 4: do with the alleged smear campaign, But she was exactly 329 00:18:53,567 --> 00:18:56,767 Speaker 4: what you were talking about, Jesse. She was being opportunistic. Yes, 330 00:18:56,847 --> 00:18:59,927 Speaker 4: so we live in the attention economy and if you 331 00:19:00,047 --> 00:19:03,527 Speaker 4: wanted to go viral, everybody looks at the numbers who 332 00:19:03,527 --> 00:19:06,407 Speaker 4: makes content and in the media, so you knew that 333 00:19:06,447 --> 00:19:10,447 Speaker 4: if you did something that was against Lively, it would 334 00:19:10,487 --> 00:19:13,687 Speaker 4: go off. So it's important to understand how something can 335 00:19:13,727 --> 00:19:17,087 Speaker 4: be both organic and manipulated because. 336 00:19:16,847 --> 00:19:19,527 Speaker 1: People will say, but hang on Blake Lively. 337 00:19:19,607 --> 00:19:23,247 Speaker 4: They didn't make her try and promote her hair care line, 338 00:19:23,287 --> 00:19:26,607 Speaker 4: they didn't make her reference alcohol, they didn't make her 339 00:19:26,647 --> 00:19:27,727 Speaker 4: wear florals. 340 00:19:28,527 --> 00:19:32,247 Speaker 1: But the thing is that it's the volume, so you can. 341 00:19:32,087 --> 00:19:35,487 Speaker 4: Start to believe, oh, everybody hates Blake Lively, and when 342 00:19:35,487 --> 00:19:39,127 Speaker 4: you hear enough of that, it does impact on how 343 00:19:39,167 --> 00:19:39,967 Speaker 4: you view someone. 344 00:19:40,207 --> 00:19:44,727 Speaker 3: And there was also I remember looking at interviews where 345 00:19:44,847 --> 00:19:48,567 Speaker 3: she seemed really insensitive about the subject matter of the film, 346 00:19:48,927 --> 00:19:51,567 Speaker 3: but it was so purposefully cut and if you watch 347 00:19:51,607 --> 00:19:54,207 Speaker 3: the whole interview, that's not how it seemed. And then 348 00:19:54,247 --> 00:19:56,927 Speaker 3: you were getting Justin Baldoni with these incredible cuts of 349 00:19:57,287 --> 00:20:01,047 Speaker 3: him saying something really eloquent about domestic violence. So it 350 00:20:01,087 --> 00:20:04,607 Speaker 3: did seem that, yeah, I suppose that that is allegedly 351 00:20:04,647 --> 00:20:05,407 Speaker 3: part of the smearing. 352 00:20:06,087 --> 00:20:09,367 Speaker 2: This is where the we can bury anyone headline comes 353 00:20:09,647 --> 00:20:13,407 Speaker 2: because in the New York Times investigation, there are literal 354 00:20:13,447 --> 00:20:18,687 Speaker 2: screenshots of text messages between Baldoni's people and the PR 355 00:20:18,767 --> 00:20:22,927 Speaker 2: people saying exactly that that they can bury anybody with 356 00:20:23,087 --> 00:20:25,807 Speaker 2: enough ammunition, and that they needed to do it to 357 00:20:25,807 --> 00:20:28,927 Speaker 2: get Baldoni's story across. We're going to be back in 358 00:20:28,967 --> 00:20:30,647 Speaker 2: a minute, but first a little break. 359 00:20:37,247 --> 00:20:41,007 Speaker 4: I want to talk about the effect of how cancelation 360 00:20:41,167 --> 00:20:45,327 Speaker 4: works and how it can be manipulated, because, having experienced 361 00:20:45,367 --> 00:20:48,567 Speaker 4: it a number of times organically, certainly not to my knowledge, 362 00:20:48,567 --> 00:20:52,407 Speaker 4: with a calculated or paid smear campaign by a publicist, 363 00:20:53,647 --> 00:20:57,847 Speaker 4: things gain traction, and then everybody wants to be part 364 00:20:57,847 --> 00:21:00,007 Speaker 4: of a pylon, right, That's why it's called a dog 365 00:21:00,047 --> 00:21:06,047 Speaker 4: pile or a pylon, and there becomes status in reinforcing 366 00:21:06,447 --> 00:21:10,967 Speaker 4: the accepted narrative, which in this case was that Justin 367 00:21:11,007 --> 00:21:13,967 Speaker 4: Baldoni was a hero and cared about domestic violence victims, 368 00:21:14,167 --> 00:21:17,727 Speaker 4: and Blake Lively was an entitled diva who cared about 369 00:21:17,727 --> 00:21:20,407 Speaker 4: nothing other than her hair and looking pretty. 370 00:21:20,967 --> 00:21:24,287 Speaker 2: And because of that that sort of narrative about who 371 00:21:24,287 --> 00:21:27,527 Speaker 2: Blake Lively was, she's a prime candidate for this, right, 372 00:21:28,047 --> 00:21:31,767 Speaker 2: because the thing that's very depressing about this story is 373 00:21:31,807 --> 00:21:34,087 Speaker 2: that we're all being manipulated all the time right on 374 00:21:34,127 --> 00:21:36,607 Speaker 2: social media, and we think we're having our own thoughts 375 00:21:36,647 --> 00:21:39,247 Speaker 2: about things and going, yes, I see, But what this 376 00:21:39,327 --> 00:21:42,487 Speaker 2: shows very clearly is that we're being As Lively said 377 00:21:42,527 --> 00:21:44,487 Speaker 2: in her statement about it, she said she wanted to 378 00:21:44,527 --> 00:21:47,407 Speaker 2: show behind the curtain of how these things start. But 379 00:21:47,527 --> 00:21:50,047 Speaker 2: one of the things that we've got to ask ourselves 380 00:21:50,167 --> 00:21:54,087 Speaker 2: is why are we so invested in thinking awful things 381 00:21:54,087 --> 00:21:58,567 Speaker 2: about women? And women like Lively? You know she in particular, 382 00:21:58,687 --> 00:22:01,607 Speaker 2: I guess she is blonde and beautiful, married to a 383 00:22:01,727 --> 00:22:03,967 Speaker 2: rich man. She is a striver we've talked about on 384 00:22:04,007 --> 00:22:05,727 Speaker 2: this show lots of times, is the worst thing you 385 00:22:05,847 --> 00:22:09,247 Speaker 2: can be. She has her own businesses, She tries really 386 00:22:09,327 --> 00:22:12,607 Speaker 2: heart like, she promoted the shit out of that movie, 387 00:22:12,967 --> 00:22:16,927 Speaker 2: and it's almost like the world was dying to believe 388 00:22:16,967 --> 00:22:18,887 Speaker 2: this about her, which is one of the things I 389 00:22:19,047 --> 00:22:21,727 Speaker 2: find deeply depressing about it. 390 00:22:21,807 --> 00:22:25,167 Speaker 3: And that's what the crisis pr person behind all of 391 00:22:25,167 --> 00:22:28,087 Speaker 3: this actually said in one of them. And the reason 392 00:22:28,087 --> 00:22:29,967 Speaker 3: we have these texts, I should say, is because they 393 00:22:29,967 --> 00:22:34,967 Speaker 3: were subpoened. So it's the genius of Blake Lively, and 394 00:22:35,007 --> 00:22:36,887 Speaker 3: all of this is to go, I'm going to get 395 00:22:36,887 --> 00:22:40,007 Speaker 3: all the evidence I need to show what really happened, 396 00:22:40,367 --> 00:22:44,527 Speaker 3: which is that you have Melissa Nathan saying basically, I 397 00:22:44,567 --> 00:22:47,647 Speaker 3: can't believe how quickly people just want to hate a woman. 398 00:22:47,967 --> 00:22:50,887 Speaker 3: I'm seeing all this positive justin Baldoni stuff, and I 399 00:22:50,887 --> 00:22:53,167 Speaker 3: don't even agree with half of it. So it was 400 00:22:53,327 --> 00:22:57,327 Speaker 3: like they lit the fire and then when it blew up, 401 00:22:57,407 --> 00:23:01,927 Speaker 3: they didn't need to do a thing, because people want 402 00:23:02,327 --> 00:23:06,407 Speaker 3: to hate a woman. And the irony of this entire 403 00:23:06,527 --> 00:23:10,207 Speaker 3: story is that it's an allegory for domestic violence in 404 00:23:10,247 --> 00:23:13,407 Speaker 3: the context of a film about domestic violence, which is 405 00:23:13,447 --> 00:23:19,327 Speaker 3: that people were so ready to jump on a woman 406 00:23:19,887 --> 00:23:25,127 Speaker 3: who maybe didn't use the right words, or was profiting 407 00:23:25,367 --> 00:23:30,487 Speaker 3: or something. And except that this man was a feminist ally, 408 00:23:30,727 --> 00:23:34,487 Speaker 3: it's almost Shakespearean in that in order to defend his 409 00:23:34,647 --> 00:23:37,127 Speaker 3: image as a feminist ally he had to bury a 410 00:23:37,167 --> 00:23:41,367 Speaker 3: female co star, and we were so happy to follow 411 00:23:41,447 --> 00:23:44,647 Speaker 3: him there, and to go not only follow him there, 412 00:23:45,767 --> 00:23:48,807 Speaker 3: like we didn't look at all the facts, which is 413 00:23:48,847 --> 00:23:52,767 Speaker 3: that none of the cast were on speaking terms with 414 00:23:52,847 --> 00:23:56,567 Speaker 3: him anymore. Colleen who all on her side, yes, and 415 00:23:56,607 --> 00:24:00,087 Speaker 3: we were so happy to follow him there. And I 416 00:24:00,087 --> 00:24:04,727 Speaker 3: think that there's a difference between doing something and expressing 417 00:24:04,767 --> 00:24:07,407 Speaker 3: the doing of something. This speaks to something that feels 418 00:24:07,527 --> 00:24:11,287 Speaker 3: very very true, which is that there are people who 419 00:24:11,407 --> 00:24:13,287 Speaker 3: use the right word to have the right link in 420 00:24:13,327 --> 00:24:18,207 Speaker 3: their Instagram bio. But that is not the same as 421 00:24:18,287 --> 00:24:21,207 Speaker 3: being the thing you're purporting to being, which is that 422 00:24:21,287 --> 00:24:25,647 Speaker 3: he's saying he supports women and that this story was 423 00:24:25,687 --> 00:24:31,087 Speaker 3: really important to him. It's just an incredible, like look 424 00:24:31,127 --> 00:24:34,007 Speaker 3: at potential if it's true hypocrisy. 425 00:24:34,247 --> 00:24:37,287 Speaker 2: I think this story has many places to go. And 426 00:24:37,567 --> 00:24:42,527 Speaker 2: today one of the PR wizards involved in this, Jennifer Abel, 427 00:24:42,607 --> 00:24:45,607 Speaker 2: has some messages that are allegedly from her, who's saying 428 00:24:45,607 --> 00:24:47,847 Speaker 2: that those messages that we were just talking about, Jesse 429 00:24:48,407 --> 00:24:50,767 Speaker 2: were cherry picked and that you didn't see others. And 430 00:24:50,807 --> 00:24:52,727 Speaker 2: I'm sure that's true. So there's are many more places 431 00:24:52,767 --> 00:24:55,447 Speaker 2: to go. But your point, Jesse is so spot on, 432 00:24:55,527 --> 00:24:58,287 Speaker 2: because I remember at the time a lot of people 433 00:24:58,287 --> 00:25:00,607 Speaker 2: have a lot of love for Baldoni and he was 434 00:25:00,647 --> 00:25:03,487 Speaker 2: seen to be doing all the right things. But I'll 435 00:25:03,527 --> 00:25:05,407 Speaker 2: just listened to the interview with him that he did 436 00:25:05,447 --> 00:25:09,487 Speaker 2: on how to Fail with Elizabeth Day and the guy Worry. 437 00:25:09,607 --> 00:25:12,887 Speaker 2: I'm just going to say it is insufferable, like he 438 00:25:13,047 --> 00:25:17,647 Speaker 2: is insufferable. He doesn't obviously go to Lively in that interview, 439 00:25:17,847 --> 00:25:21,927 Speaker 2: and it happened before the legal letter, but he described 440 00:25:21,927 --> 00:25:24,607 Speaker 2: the filming as devastatingly difficult for a number of reasons. 441 00:25:24,967 --> 00:25:26,847 Speaker 2: He made very clear on the record that he thought 442 00:25:26,847 --> 00:25:28,647 Speaker 2: there should have been a trigger warning, like it was 443 00:25:28,807 --> 00:25:34,367 Speaker 2: very clear. But the whole feeling about it, Elizabeth Day 444 00:25:34,367 --> 00:25:38,247 Speaker 2: barely gets a word in, is that he was lecturing 445 00:25:38,447 --> 00:25:42,487 Speaker 2: about victimhood. And we are always saying that we want 446 00:25:42,607 --> 00:25:45,447 Speaker 2: men to talk about domestic violence, and we do, but 447 00:25:45,567 --> 00:25:49,007 Speaker 2: we want men to talk to men about domestic violence. 448 00:25:49,527 --> 00:25:53,887 Speaker 2: We don't want them to lecture women about it. And 449 00:25:53,967 --> 00:25:56,007 Speaker 2: I know people have problems with the movie, and people 450 00:25:56,007 --> 00:25:58,567 Speaker 2: have problems with the source material of the book, But 451 00:25:58,727 --> 00:26:01,087 Speaker 2: this movie was aimed at women. The book was aimed 452 00:26:01,087 --> 00:26:04,167 Speaker 2: at women, right. It's the way that they chose to 453 00:26:04,207 --> 00:26:07,327 Speaker 2: promote it. That Baldoni then flipped in order to virtue 454 00:26:07,367 --> 00:26:10,207 Speaker 2: signal because he knew basically that he was going to 455 00:26:10,247 --> 00:26:12,887 Speaker 2: be taken down. What's also interested in all this is 456 00:26:12,927 --> 00:26:16,327 Speaker 2: that Ryan Reynolds and Blake Lively and the power that 457 00:26:16,367 --> 00:26:18,687 Speaker 2: they wield in Hollywood is probably always going to come 458 00:26:18,727 --> 00:26:21,847 Speaker 2: for him, right, So he knew that was coming, so 459 00:26:21,887 --> 00:26:26,167 Speaker 2: he wanted to position himself as the perfect allocate ally 460 00:26:26,247 --> 00:26:30,887 Speaker 2: and advocate, and he's there lecturing women about victimhood and violence. 461 00:26:31,407 --> 00:26:34,487 Speaker 2: That's not what we want from the guys. I mean, 462 00:26:34,527 --> 00:26:36,687 Speaker 2: I can't speak for all women. 463 00:26:36,487 --> 00:26:38,887 Speaker 4: But can we talk about timing for a second, because 464 00:26:39,367 --> 00:26:41,447 Speaker 4: it's pretty sobering to go online and look at some 465 00:26:41,527 --> 00:26:45,967 Speaker 4: of the reactions to this where people are just they 466 00:26:46,007 --> 00:26:48,087 Speaker 4: want to twist it and still make it about Blake 467 00:26:48,207 --> 00:26:53,047 Speaker 4: and they're not interested in facts or perspectives. Why now, 468 00:26:53,687 --> 00:26:57,447 Speaker 4: Why now it's pre Christmas? Some people have said, well, 469 00:26:57,527 --> 00:27:00,287 Speaker 4: it's just come out on Netflix. It's a calculated move. 470 00:27:01,047 --> 00:27:03,887 Speaker 4: She wants to just try and salvage the damage to 471 00:27:03,927 --> 00:27:07,847 Speaker 4: her reputation. But she didn't say anything back then like 472 00:27:07,967 --> 00:27:09,967 Speaker 4: this is everyone had gotten about it. 473 00:27:10,047 --> 00:27:11,727 Speaker 1: Essentially, she'd come back. 474 00:27:12,127 --> 00:27:15,487 Speaker 3: Why now it would have been totally lost. If she 475 00:27:15,567 --> 00:27:18,167 Speaker 3: said something back then, she would have sounded And this 476 00:27:18,287 --> 00:27:21,767 Speaker 3: is also such a great example of gas lighting. She 477 00:27:21,927 --> 00:27:24,847 Speaker 3: would have been told she was crazy. If she said 478 00:27:24,847 --> 00:27:28,847 Speaker 3: at the time that there is a manufactured effort to 479 00:27:28,927 --> 00:27:33,887 Speaker 3: bury me, people would have gone, you are grasping, how embarrassing, blah. 480 00:27:33,727 --> 00:27:36,087 Speaker 4: Blah blah, and that she was making it all about 481 00:27:36,127 --> 00:27:39,367 Speaker 4: her instead of centering the centering victims. 482 00:27:39,407 --> 00:27:41,487 Speaker 3: It's about to come out on Netflix. I'm not sure 483 00:27:41,527 --> 00:27:43,567 Speaker 3: if that's just in the US or if that's here too. 484 00:27:43,847 --> 00:27:47,607 Speaker 3: And just in the last week I started seeing stories 485 00:27:47,607 --> 00:27:50,487 Speaker 3: about Blake Lively pop up again. I saw a story 486 00:27:50,607 --> 00:27:54,047 Speaker 3: about something Ryan Reynolds had said about how he and 487 00:27:54,127 --> 00:27:56,567 Speaker 3: Blake grew up working class, and then people were going 488 00:27:56,567 --> 00:28:00,447 Speaker 3: into Blake Lively's childhood and going, that's not working class, 489 00:28:00,447 --> 00:28:01,167 Speaker 3: how embarrassing. 490 00:28:01,967 --> 00:28:02,127 Speaker 2: Ah. 491 00:28:02,327 --> 00:28:07,207 Speaker 3: Yeah, were they anticipating another wave? That's a question. And 492 00:28:07,247 --> 00:28:11,367 Speaker 3: the other reason why I think it's is because of 493 00:28:11,567 --> 00:28:14,407 Speaker 3: how long this takes. In order to do this properly, 494 00:28:15,007 --> 00:28:19,087 Speaker 3: in order to get lawyers do the research subpoena, those 495 00:28:19,407 --> 00:28:25,127 Speaker 3: text messages prove it they needed to buide their time. 496 00:28:25,327 --> 00:28:29,407 Speaker 3: And it's important to remember Blake Lively is worth about 497 00:28:29,407 --> 00:28:34,327 Speaker 3: thirty million dollars. She's rich, but she's not like the 498 00:28:34,407 --> 00:28:37,447 Speaker 3: richest person in Hollywood Ryan Reynolds is worth more than 499 00:28:37,447 --> 00:28:40,407 Speaker 3: three hundred million because he hasn't had these business ventures. 500 00:28:40,087 --> 00:28:43,127 Speaker 2: Right and also intensely well connected. 501 00:28:43,727 --> 00:28:47,047 Speaker 3: Yes, so I think it took because you can look 502 00:28:47,047 --> 00:28:50,687 Speaker 3: at this case and go, what does Blake Lively want? 503 00:28:50,727 --> 00:28:52,927 Speaker 3: This isn't going to be about damages. This isn't about 504 00:28:52,967 --> 00:28:56,887 Speaker 3: sending Justin Baldoni to jail, like, nothing about that. 505 00:28:57,087 --> 00:28:57,647 Speaker 1: Not criminal. 506 00:28:57,807 --> 00:29:01,047 Speaker 3: She wants to correct the record. And in order you 507 00:29:01,127 --> 00:29:02,847 Speaker 3: need to have power, and you need to have the 508 00:29:02,887 --> 00:29:05,967 Speaker 3: financial means, and she does. And I think that's why 509 00:29:06,007 --> 00:29:11,047 Speaker 3: she's doing it because imagine how many actresses have been 510 00:29:11,087 --> 00:29:13,887 Speaker 3: buried and have never been able to tell their story. 511 00:29:14,367 --> 00:29:14,807 Speaker 1: Well, that's the. 512 00:29:14,847 --> 00:29:17,367 Speaker 4: Rule of cancelation, isn't it. You can't defend yourself. Well 513 00:29:17,367 --> 00:29:20,487 Speaker 4: it's happening, otherwise it makes it worse. But the other 514 00:29:20,567 --> 00:29:24,047 Speaker 4: thing to note is that there's a civil complaint. But 515 00:29:24,247 --> 00:29:28,047 Speaker 4: then there's also the New York Times investigation. The lead 516 00:29:28,087 --> 00:29:31,487 Speaker 4: journalist on this was the same journalists that exposed Harvey Weinstein, 517 00:29:31,607 --> 00:29:35,887 Speaker 4: Megan Towey. And they don't just publish what someone else 518 00:29:36,047 --> 00:29:39,527 Speaker 4: wants them to publish. They go and corroborate everything. They 519 00:29:39,567 --> 00:29:43,087 Speaker 4: do their own extensive reporting out making sure that all 520 00:29:43,127 --> 00:29:46,487 Speaker 4: the sources can be confirmed. So in many ways, the 521 00:29:46,567 --> 00:29:49,567 Speaker 4: timing was more about what The New York Times was 522 00:29:49,647 --> 00:29:51,327 Speaker 4: going to do. But the other thing to remember, when 523 00:29:51,487 --> 00:29:54,687 Speaker 4: we're talking about power and money, the guy who is 524 00:29:54,807 --> 00:29:58,447 Speaker 4: the financial backer of Wayfarer, which is the studio that 525 00:29:58,687 --> 00:30:03,767 Speaker 4: Jamie Heath and Justin Baldonia partners in, is like a billionaire. 526 00:30:04,287 --> 00:30:07,447 Speaker 4: So he's also got unlimited funds. He has a lot 527 00:30:07,447 --> 00:30:10,647 Speaker 4: more money than Ryan Reynolds and Blake Lively put together. 528 00:30:10,727 --> 00:30:14,287 Speaker 4: So it's not a case of Blake Lively punching down. 529 00:30:14,487 --> 00:30:18,207 Speaker 4: The complexity of power dynamics on both the set and 530 00:30:18,287 --> 00:30:21,727 Speaker 4: in Hollywood aren't just about who's the most famous in 531 00:30:21,767 --> 00:30:22,407 Speaker 4: the Daily Mail. 532 00:30:22,887 --> 00:30:26,047 Speaker 2: You know what though, and this is a more pragmatic 533 00:30:26,087 --> 00:30:28,287 Speaker 2: reason too, is they let the movie do its thing. 534 00:30:28,447 --> 00:30:31,887 Speaker 2: That movie was really successful, Yeah, you know, so she 535 00:30:31,927 --> 00:30:35,327 Speaker 2: would have been contractually obliged to promote that movie. Also, 536 00:30:35,407 --> 00:30:38,287 Speaker 2: she clearly wanted to, and she didn't want to promote 537 00:30:38,287 --> 00:30:41,287 Speaker 2: it with him, which is again very unusual. But she 538 00:30:41,487 --> 00:30:44,327 Speaker 2: promoted the shit out of that movie while all this 539 00:30:44,527 --> 00:30:47,687 Speaker 2: was going on. It was very successful. It's had its 540 00:30:47,727 --> 00:30:51,527 Speaker 2: period of box office time and now you can sit 541 00:30:51,527 --> 00:30:53,607 Speaker 2: there and reflect on that that was all happening in 542 00:30:53,647 --> 00:30:56,407 Speaker 2: real time to her. It does seem extraordinary to me, 543 00:30:56,487 --> 00:30:59,607 Speaker 2: though I know that Baldoni has very powerful backer their 544 00:30:59,647 --> 00:31:04,367 Speaker 2: me of course, but that he ever thought that they 545 00:31:04,447 --> 00:31:09,167 Speaker 2: weren't going to do this Because Ryan Reynolds, Blake Lively 546 00:31:10,007 --> 00:31:12,007 Speaker 2: Reynolds is one of the most powerful men in Hollywood. 547 00:31:12,087 --> 00:31:14,887 Speaker 2: Deadpool was the second biggest movie of the year. He 548 00:31:14,967 --> 00:31:16,527 Speaker 2: makes a lot of people a lot of money. They 549 00:31:16,527 --> 00:31:21,087 Speaker 2: are intensely powerful. He would be furious. Imagine sitting in 550 00:31:21,087 --> 00:31:23,447 Speaker 2: that meeting that he sat in with his wife and 551 00:31:23,527 --> 00:31:26,807 Speaker 2: all those people and literally listening to that list being 552 00:31:26,847 --> 00:31:29,007 Speaker 2: read out about them walking in on her when she's 553 00:31:29,047 --> 00:31:32,327 Speaker 2: half naked and breastfeeding in her trailer. Revenge is a 554 00:31:32,407 --> 00:31:35,687 Speaker 2: dish best served cold, right. Those guys have gone and 555 00:31:35,727 --> 00:31:38,127 Speaker 2: got their ducks in a row in a very professional, 556 00:31:38,847 --> 00:31:41,647 Speaker 2: very organized manner, and now they're coming for them. And 557 00:31:42,487 --> 00:31:45,487 Speaker 2: fair enough, if indeed everything that's in that legal letter 558 00:31:45,727 --> 00:31:48,007 Speaker 2: is true, absolutely fair enough. 559 00:31:48,327 --> 00:31:50,567 Speaker 4: So what are our takeaways before we wrap up and 560 00:31:50,687 --> 00:31:52,087 Speaker 4: actually go on holidays. 561 00:31:52,367 --> 00:31:55,687 Speaker 3: I think the reason why people are so fascinated by 562 00:31:55,687 --> 00:31:59,087 Speaker 3: this is because it's an exercise in perspective, but also 563 00:31:59,887 --> 00:32:04,887 Speaker 3: we were used as audiences and consumers of media. We 564 00:32:04,887 --> 00:32:08,927 Speaker 3: were played. And the other thing is that I am 565 00:32:08,967 --> 00:32:14,967 Speaker 3: now looking at other examples of cancelation. I'm sorry, but well, 566 00:32:15,007 --> 00:32:18,327 Speaker 3: actually there are some examples of men. But what's confusing 567 00:32:18,407 --> 00:32:22,287 Speaker 3: about them are I don't know who benefited. So it's 568 00:32:22,407 --> 00:32:24,767 Speaker 3: really important when you look at a cancelation like this 569 00:32:25,287 --> 00:32:27,607 Speaker 3: to see who the winners are. But it makes me 570 00:32:27,727 --> 00:32:33,087 Speaker 3: think very differently about Megan Markle. I just wonder when 571 00:32:33,167 --> 00:32:36,327 Speaker 3: you see Walter all and wheneverone walks around and they 572 00:32:36,327 --> 00:32:38,287 Speaker 3: go I just have a sense of something. I have 573 00:32:38,327 --> 00:32:41,567 Speaker 3: a sense that they're not very nice or something. 574 00:32:41,607 --> 00:32:42,567 Speaker 1: It's a great point. 575 00:32:42,847 --> 00:32:45,887 Speaker 3: It just makes me go, how much of this is 576 00:32:45,927 --> 00:32:49,607 Speaker 3: all manufactured? And how difficult is it to prove when 577 00:32:49,607 --> 00:32:54,167 Speaker 3: these social media wizards are so much smarter than us. 578 00:32:54,607 --> 00:32:57,127 Speaker 4: So out loud as we will be returning to our 579 00:32:57,327 --> 00:33:00,407 Speaker 4: scheduled programming of hot Pods summer, where we are going 580 00:33:00,447 --> 00:33:02,607 Speaker 4: to be giving you all sorts of delicious things to 581 00:33:02,647 --> 00:33:04,327 Speaker 4: listen to over summer. 582 00:33:04,967 --> 00:33:07,207 Speaker 1: If only you could see us. Now it's early in 583 00:33:07,287 --> 00:33:09,407 Speaker 1: the morning, we are all at home. 584 00:33:09,807 --> 00:33:12,567 Speaker 4: But we really wanted to bring this to you because 585 00:33:13,247 --> 00:33:15,927 Speaker 4: we just thought that it was an important story to cover. 586 00:33:16,247 --> 00:33:18,927 Speaker 3: It was one of those stories that in terms of 587 00:33:18,927 --> 00:33:21,447 Speaker 3: the group chat, it was just going off. Look, chances 588 00:33:21,487 --> 00:33:23,847 Speaker 3: are in two days there'll be another story that blows 589 00:33:23,927 --> 00:33:25,847 Speaker 3: up our group chat and we're like, let's jump on. 590 00:33:26,527 --> 00:33:29,407 Speaker 3: But this time of year, I think we all tend 591 00:33:29,447 --> 00:33:32,487 Speaker 3: to fall into some rabbit holes, and it appears that 592 00:33:32,567 --> 00:33:33,447 Speaker 3: we were. 593 00:33:33,367 --> 00:33:34,007 Speaker 1: Victims of that. 594 00:33:34,487 --> 00:33:37,007 Speaker 2: If this conversation has brought anything up for you, help 595 00:33:37,087 --> 00:33:39,247 Speaker 2: is available. We're going to put links to resources that 596 00:33:39,287 --> 00:33:40,567 Speaker 2: can help in the show notes. 597 00:33:40,727 --> 00:33:43,527 Speaker 1: Take care, I'm going outside to touch some grass. We 598 00:33:43,647 --> 00:33:46,807 Speaker 1: love you out louders. We will be in your ears shortly. 599 00:33:47,287 --> 00:33:52,647 Speaker 3: Bye bye bye