WEBVTT - Stealth Mums, The Roblox Controversy & A Tiny Internet Feud

0:00:11.445 --> 0:00:16.364
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to Amma Mia podcast. Mamma Mia acknowledges the

0:00:16.445 --> 0:00:19.724
<v Speaker 1>traditional owners of the land and waters that this podcast

0:00:19.805 --> 0:00:20.605
<v Speaker 1>is recorded on.

0:00:27.285 --> 0:00:31.285
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to Parenting out Loud, the podcast for parents who

0:00:31.325 --> 0:00:35.365
<v Speaker 2>don't always listen to parenting podcasts. Here we are again,

0:00:35.565 --> 0:00:39.085
<v Speaker 2>another week of parenting culture, some hot takes, and this

0:00:39.165 --> 0:00:41.445
<v Speaker 2>time we're in our own podcast feed, which is nice.

0:00:41.485 --> 0:00:43.925
<v Speaker 2>So we let go of the mother ship of Mamma

0:00:43.965 --> 0:00:45.565
<v Speaker 2>Mia out Loud. We're off the teat.

0:00:45.805 --> 0:00:47.285
<v Speaker 3>We now must learn to walk.

0:00:47.765 --> 0:00:47.965
<v Speaker 4>Here.

0:00:48.005 --> 0:00:51.845
<v Speaker 1>We got a lot of avocado. Yeah, and it.

0:00:51.885 --> 0:00:53.284
<v Speaker 3>Helps you to learn to walk.

0:00:55.325 --> 0:00:55.565
<v Speaker 1>Food.

0:00:55.725 --> 0:00:59.085
<v Speaker 4>Yeah. I'm Monic Bowley, I'm Amelia Lasto, and I am

0:00:59.125 --> 0:01:02.605
<v Speaker 4>Stacy Kicks Stacy. Before we begin, I'm just sensing a

0:01:02.725 --> 0:01:05.365
<v Speaker 4>vibe from you this week that you're very stressed out.

0:01:05.725 --> 0:01:09.164
<v Speaker 1>Is that correct? Yes, I'm very stressed this week. I've

0:01:09.205 --> 0:01:11.285
<v Speaker 1>had a bit of a week. I have cried multiple

0:01:11.285 --> 0:01:13.365
<v Speaker 1>times this week, just to make the listeners feel seen

0:01:13.405 --> 0:01:16.964
<v Speaker 1>if you've done the same, which culminated in me crying

0:01:17.045 --> 0:01:19.164
<v Speaker 1>because I couldn't do a Copenhagen plank.

0:01:19.244 --> 0:01:23.244
<v Speaker 4>Sorry, Jim, what is a Copenhagen plank? I thought Copenhagen

0:01:23.285 --> 0:01:24.764
<v Speaker 4>was just about like being stylish.

0:01:25.244 --> 0:01:26.125
<v Speaker 2>Yes, so nice.

0:01:26.244 --> 0:01:27.045
<v Speaker 3>It was ice cream.

0:01:27.444 --> 0:01:30.604
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it was like a torture device. I don't know why.

0:01:30.684 --> 0:01:32.804
<v Speaker 1>I had to have one leg suspended in the air

0:01:32.964 --> 0:01:36.244
<v Speaker 1>in a sideways plank and I couldn't do it, and

0:01:36.324 --> 0:01:38.685
<v Speaker 1>the trainer came to help me. I got very upset

0:01:38.725 --> 0:01:41.244
<v Speaker 1>and I said, it's not about the Copenhagen plank.

0:01:41.285 --> 0:01:43.844
<v Speaker 4>It's never about the Copenhagen should be over the edge.

0:01:43.884 --> 0:01:45.725
<v Speaker 1>But I'm very happy to be with you guys, very

0:01:45.765 --> 0:01:47.805
<v Speaker 1>happy to be doing this. It's the highlight of my week.

0:01:48.165 --> 0:01:50.605
<v Speaker 2>Oh, Stacy, let's just ignore you crying in the corner.

0:01:50.925 --> 0:01:53.525
<v Speaker 2>Grab a tissue. This is what's coming up on today's show.

0:01:53.845 --> 0:01:56.805
<v Speaker 1>The girl Boss is dead and them influencer is out,

0:01:56.925 --> 0:01:59.565
<v Speaker 1>and there's a new status symbol in pretending you just

0:01:59.565 --> 0:02:00.445
<v Speaker 1>don't have kids at all.

0:02:00.684 --> 0:02:03.205
<v Speaker 4>I want to talk about how the raw book around

0:02:03.285 --> 0:02:07.965
<v Speaker 4>praise has changed, and whether compliments and how we compliment

0:02:08.005 --> 0:02:12.525
<v Speaker 4>people is just yet another topic around which millennials are overthinking.

0:02:13.325 --> 0:02:17.805
<v Speaker 2>I saw a tiny feud on Facebook and it's changed

0:02:17.845 --> 0:02:20.245
<v Speaker 2>the way I think about reading with my kids, and

0:02:20.285 --> 0:02:21.605
<v Speaker 2>I want to bring it to your attention.

0:02:21.925 --> 0:02:24.285
<v Speaker 4>Oh, I love a tiny few. There's a Reddit board

0:02:24.365 --> 0:02:28.765
<v Speaker 4>called niche scandals, and it's just all about like people

0:02:28.805 --> 0:02:32.085
<v Speaker 4>on crafting boards, like arguing with each other, and it's

0:02:32.125 --> 0:02:33.605
<v Speaker 4>the best to have a low stakes feud.

0:02:33.645 --> 0:02:35.005
<v Speaker 1>That sounds duey.

0:02:35.045 --> 0:02:38.245
<v Speaker 2>This starts like a niche scandal, But then what I

0:02:38.405 --> 0:02:40.805
<v Speaker 2>discovered is it's actually a bigger thing.

0:02:40.925 --> 0:02:42.165
<v Speaker 3>It's a bigger thing. I can't wait.

0:02:42.485 --> 0:02:45.685
<v Speaker 4>But first, in case you missed it, I have to

0:02:45.725 --> 0:02:47.645
<v Speaker 4>talk to you about Roadblocks and why it's in the

0:02:47.645 --> 0:02:48.325
<v Speaker 4>news this week.

0:02:48.405 --> 0:02:50.805
<v Speaker 1>What is a roadblock? And why am I buying my

0:02:50.805 --> 0:02:54.445
<v Speaker 1>friend's kids Roebucks gift cards every Christmas? And why am

0:02:54.445 --> 0:02:55.484
<v Speaker 1>I talking about it this week?

0:02:55.565 --> 0:02:59.845
<v Speaker 4>Yeah? So Roadblocks is an online gaming platform and the

0:02:59.885 --> 0:03:01.445
<v Speaker 4>reason it's in the news this week it's been around

0:03:01.485 --> 0:03:04.205
<v Speaker 4>since two thousand and six, is because as we're all

0:03:04.245 --> 0:03:08.285
<v Speaker 4>preparing for the government's Social Media band to come into effect,

0:03:08.805 --> 0:03:12.085
<v Speaker 4>a loophole has been discovered. And the loophole is Roadbox.

0:03:12.525 --> 0:03:15.685
<v Speaker 4>Because while Roadblocks is ostensibly a place where you go

0:03:15.725 --> 0:03:19.965
<v Speaker 4>to play games online, it's actually a social media site

0:03:20.005 --> 0:03:23.805
<v Speaker 4>in disguise, and so it's not subject to this new

0:03:23.925 --> 0:03:26.885
<v Speaker 4>Under SIXTEENES ban, but a lot of people are saying

0:03:27.045 --> 0:03:30.405
<v Speaker 4>it should be. So Roadblocks has tried to preemp this

0:03:30.525 --> 0:03:33.405
<v Speaker 4>by saying, hey, here's this new suite of safety features

0:03:33.445 --> 0:03:36.805
<v Speaker 4>we have. But a lot of parents and experts say

0:03:36.845 --> 0:03:39.405
<v Speaker 4>this is not going far enough. That Roadblocks is actually

0:03:39.485 --> 0:03:42.525
<v Speaker 4>really dangerous for kids, and we have to think more

0:03:42.565 --> 0:03:44.485
<v Speaker 4>systematically about how to make it safer.

0:03:44.725 --> 0:03:49.205
<v Speaker 3>Roadblocks is cooked. Let's just put this on the table.

0:03:49.245 --> 0:03:51.565
<v Speaker 1>It is. But I say this was like the sims like,

0:03:51.685 --> 0:03:53.765
<v Speaker 1>is this not just like building little villag Yes.

0:03:54.125 --> 0:03:55.885
<v Speaker 3>I think it started out like that, Stacy.

0:03:55.925 --> 0:03:57.845
<v Speaker 2>I think ten years ago when it came out, people

0:03:57.885 --> 0:04:01.125
<v Speaker 2>touted it as this great place for entrepreneurship and it

0:04:01.165 --> 0:04:03.845
<v Speaker 2>teaches kids how to code, because essentially what it is

0:04:03.845 --> 0:04:06.165
<v Speaker 2>is it's a platform where you can go on and

0:04:06.205 --> 0:04:08.965
<v Speaker 2>build a game and then people come and play your games.

0:04:09.605 --> 0:04:12.165
<v Speaker 3>But what'spened is that now.

0:04:11.885 --> 0:04:14.205
<v Speaker 2>Because of the popularity of it, and it's something like

0:04:15.205 --> 0:04:19.325
<v Speaker 2>sixty eight million uses a day, forty million of them

0:04:19.404 --> 0:04:22.285
<v Speaker 2>are under the age of thirteen, it's just become this

0:04:22.404 --> 0:04:25.725
<v Speaker 2>kind of free fall and now it's a place that's

0:04:25.765 --> 0:04:31.685
<v Speaker 2>full of grooming, inappropriate content, bullying, racism, anti semitism. It's

0:04:31.765 --> 0:04:35.925
<v Speaker 2>banned in Qatar and Turkey. It's being sued by Louisiana.

0:04:36.085 --> 0:04:40.685
<v Speaker 2>But most importantly, this game uses addiction based mechanics for kids.

0:04:40.485 --> 0:04:44.085
<v Speaker 2>It addicts kids, it hooks them. It is a very

0:04:44.125 --> 0:04:44.805
<v Speaker 2>bad place.

0:04:44.925 --> 0:04:47.885
<v Speaker 4>So I've been hearing about it a lot from my

0:04:48.485 --> 0:04:51.205
<v Speaker 4>seven year old and I sort of thought, oh, it

0:04:51.285 --> 0:04:54.205
<v Speaker 4>seems gentle. Like one of the most popular games on

0:04:54.245 --> 0:04:57.205
<v Speaker 4>there is a game where you essentially grow a garden,

0:04:57.445 --> 0:04:59.165
<v Speaker 4>and I thought, well, that sounds nice. It sort of

0:04:59.165 --> 0:05:02.365
<v Speaker 4>sounds like Beatrix Potter, how lovely, and it's free. Great,

0:05:03.085 --> 0:05:06.005
<v Speaker 4>So I go online to play it with him, and

0:05:06.245 --> 0:05:09.685
<v Speaker 4>very shortly he's in a game where he's playing an

0:05:09.765 --> 0:05:13.045
<v Speaker 4>ice a as in The Masked People, who scoop people

0:05:13.125 --> 0:05:15.685
<v Speaker 4>up off the streets in the US and take them

0:05:15.685 --> 0:05:19.885
<v Speaker 4>to immigration prison. And I suddenly realized that because it's

0:05:19.925 --> 0:05:23.645
<v Speaker 4>open source, you start with the garden game, you end

0:05:23.765 --> 0:05:27.685
<v Speaker 4>up playing an ice agent with a machine gun. Mon's

0:05:27.925 --> 0:05:31.005
<v Speaker 4>you have done some research around there? Since I'm curious

0:05:31.005 --> 0:05:33.445
<v Speaker 4>to know the answer. Has it always been like this,

0:05:33.605 --> 0:05:36.445
<v Speaker 4>like why do we think it's the acceptable face of gaming?

0:05:36.485 --> 0:05:37.365
<v Speaker 4>Like what happened?

0:05:37.925 --> 0:05:41.925
<v Speaker 2>I think it's victim of inshitification. Now, this is a term.

0:05:42.005 --> 0:05:43.845
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if you've heard of it. It's basically

0:05:43.885 --> 0:05:46.605
<v Speaker 2>for when things turn to shit. So it's the process

0:05:46.645 --> 0:05:50.005
<v Speaker 2>where online platforms start out really good and then they

0:05:50.085 --> 0:05:54.965
<v Speaker 2>deteriorate over time because they become sort of just about

0:05:55.285 --> 0:05:59.085
<v Speaker 2>shareholders at everyone's expense. So an example like being yes

0:05:59.365 --> 0:06:02.445
<v Speaker 2>or you know, when Instagram first started, it was just

0:06:02.525 --> 0:06:05.685
<v Speaker 2>your friends in the news feed, and now it's people

0:06:05.765 --> 0:06:08.165
<v Speaker 2>you don't know and a lot of ads. It's sort

0:06:08.205 --> 0:06:10.645
<v Speaker 2>of the same thing with Twitter. It's really gone down

0:06:10.685 --> 0:06:12.965
<v Speaker 2>the toilet. So I feel like.

0:06:13.045 --> 0:06:17.125
<v Speaker 3>Perhaps Roadblocks is victim of intititification.

0:06:16.805 --> 0:06:20.325
<v Speaker 4>And that's why Australia's e Safety Commissioner has flagged Roadblocks

0:06:20.365 --> 0:06:22.645
<v Speaker 4>and has said that in addition to the Under sixteen

0:06:22.645 --> 0:06:24.685
<v Speaker 4>social media Band, we've got to talk about how to

0:06:24.725 --> 0:06:28.165
<v Speaker 4>protect kids on roadblocks and look to be fair to Roadblocks.

0:06:28.285 --> 0:06:30.445
<v Speaker 4>I should mention what they came out with this week.

0:06:30.445 --> 0:06:33.245
<v Speaker 4>They said that under sixteen's accounts will now be private

0:06:33.285 --> 0:06:36.885
<v Speaker 4>by default and they will be unable to chat with adults.

0:06:36.885 --> 0:06:38.645
<v Speaker 4>And the reason why they had to put that in

0:06:39.165 --> 0:06:43.045
<v Speaker 4>is because there was grooming happening on roadblocks. There have

0:06:43.125 --> 0:06:46.844
<v Speaker 4>been many people arrested. Two dozen is the number. Actually,

0:06:46.925 --> 0:06:49.844
<v Speaker 4>two dozen adults have been arrested on suspicion of abusing

0:06:49.925 --> 0:06:52.525
<v Speaker 4>or abducting victims that they groomed on roadblocks, So this

0:06:52.645 --> 0:06:54.525
<v Speaker 4>is very much a live issue. They reckon.

0:06:54.525 --> 0:06:56.445
<v Speaker 3>The big problem with roadblocks is the chat feature.

0:06:56.805 --> 0:06:56.965
<v Speaker 4>Right.

0:06:57.045 --> 0:06:58.844
<v Speaker 2>This is what a lot of people say, is that's

0:06:58.885 --> 0:07:01.045
<v Speaker 2>how predators come in. They chat with your kids, they

0:07:01.085 --> 0:07:03.765
<v Speaker 2>can groom your kids. But I don't quite believe it.

0:07:04.085 --> 0:07:06.605
<v Speaker 2>I think eliminating the chat function does not solve any

0:07:06.645 --> 0:07:08.685
<v Speaker 2>of the problems, because there's other ways that your kids

0:07:08.685 --> 0:07:11.605
<v Speaker 2>can see things. People can write things on buildings, people

0:07:11.605 --> 0:07:14.005
<v Speaker 2>can have a speech bubble coming out of them. I

0:07:14.045 --> 0:07:17.205
<v Speaker 2>know there's probably people listening whose kids play this. There

0:07:17.245 --> 0:07:20.045
<v Speaker 2>are other games that kids can play where they are

0:07:20.085 --> 0:07:23.605
<v Speaker 2>building things, learning things. I can't see any advantage for

0:07:23.685 --> 0:07:24.325
<v Speaker 2>kids being on.

0:07:24.365 --> 0:07:26.285
<v Speaker 1>Right, But I don't think it's as easy as that.

0:07:26.405 --> 0:07:29.445
<v Speaker 4>Mon's like speaking as someone who's having to negotiate this

0:07:29.605 --> 0:07:33.565
<v Speaker 4>right now. If I disconnect from roadblocks and I ban

0:07:33.685 --> 0:07:38.005
<v Speaker 4>it completely, the children will always find something else to play,

0:07:38.165 --> 0:07:40.525
<v Speaker 4>and keeping the line of communication open, I think is

0:07:40.525 --> 0:07:43.205
<v Speaker 4>the only solution rather than saying we're just not going

0:07:43.245 --> 0:07:44.165
<v Speaker 4>to play it all.

0:07:44.205 --> 0:07:47.365
<v Speaker 2>The experts say there is no safe way for kids

0:07:47.405 --> 0:07:50.285
<v Speaker 2>to use this, and if they are not old enough

0:07:50.325 --> 0:07:52.805
<v Speaker 2>to see porn. They are not old enough to play

0:07:52.805 --> 0:07:55.845
<v Speaker 2>this game. I know you're rolling your eyes, but I

0:07:55.925 --> 0:08:00.205
<v Speaker 2>follow this quite daggy Instagram account called the family it Guy.

0:08:00.325 --> 0:08:04.045
<v Speaker 2>This guy's a cybersecurity expert and a dad, and he

0:08:04.125 --> 0:08:06.725
<v Speaker 2>registered on Roadblocks as an eight year old and he

0:08:06.885 --> 0:08:10.045
<v Speaker 2>joined a game. Within minutes, he joined a game called

0:08:10.125 --> 0:08:13.925
<v Speaker 2>puss Blick Bathroom Simulator, which was a simulator where you

0:08:13.965 --> 0:08:17.365
<v Speaker 2>can only imagine what was going on in there, stuff

0:08:17.405 --> 0:08:20.525
<v Speaker 2>that eight year olds should not be seeing. So I

0:08:20.565 --> 0:08:23.805
<v Speaker 2>don't think Roadblocks is going far enough with parental controls.

0:08:23.965 --> 0:08:27.085
<v Speaker 2>I think that also this e Safety Commissioner is not

0:08:27.125 --> 0:08:29.685
<v Speaker 2>going far enough with this fine. So the Australian government

0:08:29.725 --> 0:08:33.045
<v Speaker 2>is saying we're going to find Roadblocks forty five million

0:08:33.085 --> 0:08:35.725
<v Speaker 2>dollars for non compliance. But guys, this is a ninety

0:08:35.765 --> 0:08:39.605
<v Speaker 2>five billion dollar company. Forty five million to them, that's

0:08:39.725 --> 0:08:42.045
<v Speaker 2>like you walking down the street with one hundred thousand

0:08:42.045 --> 0:08:45.685
<v Speaker 2>dollars in your pocket and shelling out fifty bucks. It's nothing.

0:08:46.085 --> 0:08:48.525
<v Speaker 1>I've seen stories. There was a case in Kansas where

0:08:48.525 --> 0:08:52.045
<v Speaker 1>an eight year old girl was sending inappropriate images to

0:08:52.365 --> 0:08:55.444
<v Speaker 1>a stranger that was sending her roebucks send her thousands

0:08:55.445 --> 0:08:56.045
<v Speaker 1>of Roebucks.

0:08:56.245 --> 0:08:58.765
<v Speaker 4>Yes, because the other element that we haven't even really

0:08:58.805 --> 0:09:01.125
<v Speaker 4>talked about here is the fact that while these games

0:09:01.125 --> 0:09:04.804
<v Speaker 4>start out as free very quickly, as I discovered when

0:09:04.845 --> 0:09:07.645
<v Speaker 4>I played, you were prompted to buy things in order

0:09:07.685 --> 0:09:10.645
<v Speaker 4>to level up to a more advanced stage of various games,

0:09:10.645 --> 0:09:12.405
<v Speaker 4>and those numbers add up really quickly.

0:09:12.525 --> 0:09:15.205
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but you're doing the right thing by playing the games, Like,

0:09:15.205 --> 0:09:18.485
<v Speaker 1>I don't want everyone, especially people whose children are already

0:09:18.525 --> 0:09:21.005
<v Speaker 1>on this game, to feel like right, the solution is

0:09:21.045 --> 0:09:23.204
<v Speaker 1>that we need to just snatch the iPad off them

0:09:23.205 --> 0:09:25.005
<v Speaker 1>and they're not allowed on it anymore. Like we run

0:09:25.045 --> 0:09:27.965
<v Speaker 1>a story on the site this week written by Madeline West,

0:09:28.045 --> 0:09:32.005
<v Speaker 1>you know Neighbors actress Madeline West, like she's an icon,

0:09:32.045 --> 0:09:34.765
<v Speaker 1>but she works as an online safety advocate now for

0:09:34.885 --> 0:09:37.285
<v Speaker 1>Old Shift, and she was saying that the best thing

0:09:37.405 --> 0:09:39.325
<v Speaker 1>to do is never make your child afraid that if

0:09:39.365 --> 0:09:41.805
<v Speaker 1>they tell you something that you'll take their devices away.

0:09:42.045 --> 0:09:43.965
<v Speaker 1>That you need to, as much as it can feel

0:09:43.965 --> 0:09:46.805
<v Speaker 1>like pulling teeth, be involved and be playing whatever games

0:09:46.845 --> 0:09:49.324
<v Speaker 1>they're playing so that they do feel like when things

0:09:49.405 --> 0:09:51.005
<v Speaker 1>like this happen they can raise it with you.

0:09:51.165 --> 0:09:54.125
<v Speaker 4>Well. And the other broader problem is that as a parent,

0:09:54.165 --> 0:09:57.885
<v Speaker 4>you're always trying to stay ahead of what the kids

0:09:57.885 --> 0:10:01.045
<v Speaker 4>are interested in. It is a little bit like whack

0:10:01.045 --> 0:10:03.725
<v Speaker 4>a mole, because once you've established that one thing is

0:10:03.805 --> 0:10:06.685
<v Speaker 4>problematic in some way, they will move on to something else.

0:10:06.725 --> 0:10:08.565
<v Speaker 4>So that, as you say, the solution is not to

0:10:08.645 --> 0:10:11.165
<v Speaker 4>throw the baby out with the bathwater, but instead try

0:10:11.205 --> 0:10:14.125
<v Speaker 4>and find a way forward with the platforms that they

0:10:14.245 --> 0:10:16.525
<v Speaker 4>enjoy and stay connected to what they're doing.

0:10:16.605 --> 0:10:18.445
<v Speaker 1>I guess so, I guess we're going to be planting

0:10:18.525 --> 0:10:19.125
<v Speaker 1>veggies on.

0:10:19.085 --> 0:10:22.525
<v Speaker 4>This game on the weekend, not being ice agents.

0:10:23.085 --> 0:10:26.325
<v Speaker 1>While women once loudly and proudly celebrated the era of

0:10:26.365 --> 0:10:30.005
<v Speaker 1>girl bosses and leaning in, we're now seeing women pretending

0:10:30.085 --> 0:10:32.925
<v Speaker 1>that they aren't even parents at all, so they're working

0:10:33.085 --> 0:10:35.765
<v Speaker 1>and looking like they're child free. There's a few examples

0:10:35.765 --> 0:10:38.045
<v Speaker 1>of this in the culture this week. Case in point

0:10:38.645 --> 0:10:41.525
<v Speaker 1>Margo Robbie. It would have been hard to ignore the

0:10:41.565 --> 0:10:44.565
<v Speaker 1>images of Margo Robbie around this week on her press tour.

0:10:44.645 --> 0:10:47.564
<v Speaker 1>Have you seen them? Yes, the naked dress. You've surely

0:10:47.605 --> 0:10:50.805
<v Speaker 1>seen her believable, Yeah, loved it, I fell hook line

0:10:50.845 --> 0:10:52.965
<v Speaker 1>and singer. I've seen her from every angle that you

0:10:52.965 --> 0:10:56.245
<v Speaker 1>could see her I thought she looked amazing. So she's

0:10:56.365 --> 0:10:58.365
<v Speaker 1>on the press tour for her movie, which is called

0:10:58.405 --> 0:11:01.085
<v Speaker 1>A Big, Bold, Beautiful Journey, which feels like too many

0:11:01.085 --> 0:11:03.085
<v Speaker 1>words for a movie title, but we're going to skim

0:11:03.165 --> 0:11:06.565
<v Speaker 1>right over that. So what she's doing essentially, which a

0:11:06.565 --> 0:11:09.444
<v Speaker 1>lot of the celebrities do nowadays, is that they're getting

0:11:09.485 --> 0:11:12.245
<v Speaker 1>you to note their film, like we saw Zendea do

0:11:12.325 --> 0:11:15.285
<v Speaker 1>it with Challengers. We saw Margo do it when she

0:11:15.365 --> 0:11:18.085
<v Speaker 1>was on the Barbie press tour as well, like people

0:11:18.085 --> 0:11:21.725
<v Speaker 1>are paying attention because of their outfits. There's six words

0:11:21.765 --> 0:11:24.804
<v Speaker 1>I've heard on repeat when people are seeing these images

0:11:24.845 --> 0:11:27.405
<v Speaker 1>this week that I wanted to interrogate a little bit,

0:11:27.645 --> 0:11:30.605
<v Speaker 1>and those words are didn't she just have a baby?

0:11:31.005 --> 0:11:33.805
<v Speaker 1>So I feel like that's a reaction that everyone I.

0:11:33.725 --> 0:11:34.325
<v Speaker 3>Have said that.

0:11:35.245 --> 0:11:38.685
<v Speaker 2>I said that myself. Actually, do you know the headlines

0:11:38.725 --> 0:11:40.965
<v Speaker 2>around this rankled me a little bit. I know you're

0:11:40.965 --> 0:11:42.525
<v Speaker 2>going to get into some other stuff, but I just

0:11:42.565 --> 0:11:45.365
<v Speaker 2>want to put this on the table first. Every headline

0:11:45.405 --> 0:11:46.204
<v Speaker 2>that I read was.

0:11:46.165 --> 0:11:48.645
<v Speaker 3>Like, she's back, She's back.

0:11:48.445 --> 0:11:51.725
<v Speaker 2>And I just felt like the undertone was, oh, thank God,

0:11:51.765 --> 0:11:54.485
<v Speaker 2>like she's bounced back, she's hot, and she's working again,

0:11:54.525 --> 0:11:58.725
<v Speaker 2>and it was just this subtext of a woman pretending

0:11:58.765 --> 0:12:00.485
<v Speaker 2>she never really had a baby in the first place

0:12:00.845 --> 0:12:04.405
<v Speaker 2>is what we want to see like glamorous hot. But

0:12:04.525 --> 0:12:06.405
<v Speaker 2>this is a discussion that they had in MoMA Mea

0:12:06.445 --> 0:12:08.204
<v Speaker 2>out Loud, So if you want to go into sort

0:12:08.205 --> 0:12:10.605
<v Speaker 2>of that, I would highly recommend you listen to Me

0:12:10.685 --> 0:12:12.925
<v Speaker 2>out Loud episode On that Mea Friedman goes.

0:12:12.925 --> 0:12:15.365
<v Speaker 1>Off, Yeah, we need to remember, like this is her

0:12:15.405 --> 0:12:18.684
<v Speaker 1>literal job, like her body and her appearance, let's be honest,

0:12:18.805 --> 0:12:21.045
<v Speaker 1>is her job. So of course that is what she's

0:12:21.125 --> 0:12:23.045
<v Speaker 1>going to be doing to be getting back to her role.

0:12:23.085 --> 0:12:26.805
<v Speaker 1>That's not the case for us, thank god. But people

0:12:26.805 --> 0:12:29.485
<v Speaker 1>are either saying, didn't she have a baby or they

0:12:29.525 --> 0:12:31.925
<v Speaker 1>totally forgot she had a baby at all. And I

0:12:31.925 --> 0:12:33.804
<v Speaker 1>think there's a little bit of a pattern that we're

0:12:33.845 --> 0:12:37.125
<v Speaker 1>seeing now with this, where women were once celebrating that

0:12:37.205 --> 0:12:40.444
<v Speaker 1>era of girl bosses and leaning in, and we're now

0:12:40.485 --> 0:12:43.445
<v Speaker 1>seeing women pretending that they're not even parents at all,

0:12:43.525 --> 0:12:46.845
<v Speaker 1>Like that seems like the new cool girl thing to do,

0:12:47.045 --> 0:12:48.605
<v Speaker 1>Like don't you think this feels like the new top

0:12:48.645 --> 0:12:49.405
<v Speaker 1>tier of Mummy.

0:12:49.525 --> 0:12:52.485
<v Speaker 4>What I found fascinating about it is that our team

0:12:52.565 --> 0:12:58.525
<v Speaker 4>here established that Margo has talked about her baby exactly once.

0:12:58.765 --> 0:13:01.125
<v Speaker 5>Everyone who was sitting with me were, I mean the

0:13:01.365 --> 0:13:07.445
<v Speaker 5>music number, the musical number happens, And honestly, I'm so sorry,

0:13:08.085 --> 0:13:10.685
<v Speaker 5>great sound track, isn't that you can do?

0:13:11.765 --> 0:13:13.564
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry I had to start the interview for a set, yeah,

0:13:13.565 --> 0:13:15.405
<v Speaker 1>because like, aren't you isn't there a part of you?

0:13:15.445 --> 0:13:21.965
<v Speaker 1>There's like yes, I like time, that's it.

0:13:22.805 --> 0:13:25.405
<v Speaker 4>And what I think is fascinating about this is it's

0:13:25.525 --> 0:13:28.325
<v Speaker 4>kind of the era of being a stealth mum. And

0:13:28.365 --> 0:13:32.165
<v Speaker 4>it's so different from ten years ago when celebrities would

0:13:32.165 --> 0:13:36.605
<v Speaker 4>talk endlessly, ad infinitum about how having children had changed

0:13:36.685 --> 0:13:40.085
<v Speaker 4>everything for them. I'm now picking roles that are more

0:13:40.365 --> 0:13:43.365
<v Speaker 4>compassionate and more deep, and now they're.

0:13:43.125 --> 0:13:45.445
<v Speaker 1>Just not talking about it at all. I feel like

0:13:45.485 --> 0:13:49.005
<v Speaker 1>you see that with your friends, like your normy friends

0:13:49.005 --> 0:13:51.565
<v Speaker 1>that have three hundred followers on Instagram, Like I know

0:13:51.685 --> 0:13:54.084
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people now they don't announce their pregnancy,

0:13:54.365 --> 0:13:57.365
<v Speaker 1>they don't announce the birth, Nope. They just start having

0:13:57.445 --> 0:13:59.685
<v Speaker 1>like little toes in the corner of their photo or

0:13:59.885 --> 0:14:02.525
<v Speaker 1>the back of a baby's head. Like it's very much

0:14:02.565 --> 0:14:04.485
<v Speaker 1>a thing now, like a cool girl thing. And I

0:14:04.485 --> 0:14:06.285
<v Speaker 1>guess Margot is the old pap or girl.

0:14:06.365 --> 0:14:10.245
<v Speaker 4>It started with Kylie Jenna having a completely secret pregnancy.

0:14:10.565 --> 0:14:13.805
<v Speaker 1>Maybe that was it. Yeah, the stealth mom started with

0:14:13.885 --> 0:14:16.285
<v Speaker 1>Kylie like every other bloody trend on this planet.

0:14:16.445 --> 0:14:18.885
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I so agree. This cultural shift is so interesting.

0:14:18.965 --> 0:14:21.565
<v Speaker 2>So first we had girl Boss, Rise and Grind. Then

0:14:21.605 --> 0:14:25.605
<v Speaker 2>it was sharanting like it was very much oversharing everything

0:14:25.605 --> 0:14:29.645
<v Speaker 2>about parenting everywhere like hashtag real. But now I agree

0:14:29.645 --> 0:14:32.285
<v Speaker 2>it is stealth mum where your kids are not your brand.

0:14:32.405 --> 0:14:36.085
<v Speaker 2>So Kylie Jenner, what about Hailey Bieber? She never talks

0:14:36.085 --> 0:14:38.645
<v Speaker 2>about her baby. Margot Robbie doesn't talk about her baby.

0:14:38.925 --> 0:14:42.045
<v Speaker 2>It's like a flex of Yeah, I have kids, but

0:14:42.085 --> 0:14:43.525
<v Speaker 2>I don't need to make them my brand.

0:14:43.845 --> 0:14:45.645
<v Speaker 4>And I get it. Look, I used to have a

0:14:45.685 --> 0:14:47.645
<v Speaker 4>thing and I've spoken about it on this podcast where

0:14:48.005 --> 0:14:49.685
<v Speaker 4>I still kind of have it at my day job

0:14:49.765 --> 0:14:53.165
<v Speaker 4>where I just do not want to talk about having

0:14:53.325 --> 0:14:56.325
<v Speaker 4>kids at work. And if no one ever has to

0:14:56.365 --> 0:14:59.205
<v Speaker 4>hear about me going to a school concert, that my

0:14:59.285 --> 0:14:59.965
<v Speaker 4>sweet spot.

0:15:00.085 --> 0:15:01.725
<v Speaker 1>I kind of tried to do the same thing when

0:15:01.765 --> 0:15:03.605
<v Speaker 1>I started at Mum and Mea. I was like, you know,

0:15:04.005 --> 0:15:06.085
<v Speaker 1>it's a fresh start. I'm going to be really cool

0:15:06.125 --> 0:15:08.565
<v Speaker 1>and mysterious, and you know they'll be shocked, like a

0:15:08.645 --> 0:15:10.805
<v Speaker 1>year down the track when they find out a a kid,

0:15:10.805 --> 0:15:13.725
<v Speaker 1>because obviously I'm too young to have a child. And

0:15:13.765 --> 0:15:16.125
<v Speaker 1>then like I think, at about one pm on my

0:15:16.165 --> 0:15:18.485
<v Speaker 1>first day, I might have mentioned I got an update

0:15:18.485 --> 0:15:20.725
<v Speaker 1>photo of my daughter, so it all went out the window.

0:15:20.805 --> 0:15:22.965
<v Speaker 4>But why do we think that way, and why is

0:15:23.005 --> 0:15:26.165
<v Speaker 4>it sort of now cool to not talk about your

0:15:26.245 --> 0:15:29.205
<v Speaker 4>children or to sort of act like you don't have children.

0:15:29.285 --> 0:15:31.685
<v Speaker 1>It's almost like you've got to pick a brand for

0:15:31.765 --> 0:15:34.485
<v Speaker 1>your job, and if your child doesn't align with your brand,

0:15:34.565 --> 0:15:36.365
<v Speaker 1>then you know they have to be kept separate.

0:15:36.485 --> 0:15:39.885
<v Speaker 3>I wonder if it's a generational thing. So millennials centered

0:15:39.965 --> 0:15:43.045
<v Speaker 3>their children at the center of the world. We are

0:15:43.125 --> 0:15:46.605
<v Speaker 3>intense parents, We are overparenting. I wonder if the next

0:15:46.605 --> 0:15:50.045
<v Speaker 3>generation alphas or z's are going the other way, where

0:15:50.085 --> 0:15:52.885
<v Speaker 3>they're centering themselves and they keep true to themselves and

0:15:52.925 --> 0:15:55.205
<v Speaker 3>what they're doing, and they don't make their kids their

0:15:55.325 --> 0:15:58.645
<v Speaker 3>entire personality. It's just probably a reflexive action. You know,

0:15:58.685 --> 0:16:00.885
<v Speaker 3>how we parent in the way in the opposite way

0:16:00.885 --> 0:16:04.125
<v Speaker 3>to our parents parented. Maybe the next generation is saying,

0:16:04.325 --> 0:16:06.285
<v Speaker 3>I don't want everything to be about my kids, still

0:16:06.285 --> 0:16:07.525
<v Speaker 3>about me. I'm still number one.

0:16:07.805 --> 0:16:10.285
<v Speaker 4>I've got a theory that I think it's a bit political.

0:16:11.125 --> 0:16:13.365
<v Speaker 4>I think the reason why we've seen the rise of

0:16:13.365 --> 0:16:17.085
<v Speaker 4>the stealth mum is because it reflects this newfound ambivalence

0:16:17.085 --> 0:16:19.725
<v Speaker 4>we have about the very idea of the working mother.

0:16:20.205 --> 0:16:23.525
<v Speaker 4>We all know that the tradwife wave happened, but those

0:16:23.605 --> 0:16:26.725
<v Speaker 4>trad wifs were already doing a job. They were performing

0:16:26.725 --> 0:16:28.765
<v Speaker 4>the job of being a trad wife. But now I

0:16:28.845 --> 0:16:33.485
<v Speaker 4>think there's this deep seated kind of nervousness about how

0:16:33.525 --> 0:16:36.725
<v Speaker 4>you have a kid in capitalism at all, and people

0:16:36.765 --> 0:16:39.605
<v Speaker 4>are just saying, of all political stripes, I don't want

0:16:39.645 --> 0:16:42.485
<v Speaker 4>to have to do that. The workplace was structured for men,

0:16:43.085 --> 0:16:46.925
<v Speaker 4>and it's impossible in some ways to fulfill both the

0:16:47.005 --> 0:16:49.245
<v Speaker 4>role of being a parent and the role of being

0:16:49.245 --> 0:16:51.765
<v Speaker 4>a good employee. And they're checking out of it, and

0:16:51.805 --> 0:16:54.205
<v Speaker 4>they're saying, I don't want to do that anymore. And

0:16:54.245 --> 0:16:57.405
<v Speaker 4>I think that's why it's almost become like daggy to

0:16:57.565 --> 0:17:00.405
<v Speaker 4>try and balance the two, because it's sort of seen

0:17:00.405 --> 0:17:02.045
<v Speaker 4>as like, well, you're clearly not doing a good job

0:17:02.085 --> 0:17:02.965
<v Speaker 4>on either of them.

0:17:03.045 --> 0:17:06.004
<v Speaker 1>And it's interesting when you use the term stealth mumming,

0:17:06.004 --> 0:17:07.764
<v Speaker 1>because I've seen that. This week there was a piece

0:17:07.805 --> 0:17:10.205
<v Speaker 1>in the Cut where they talked about Vogue's new editor.

0:17:10.484 --> 0:17:13.484
<v Speaker 1>Vogues knew she's called head of editorial Content so that

0:17:13.484 --> 0:17:16.885
<v Speaker 1>there's never another editor after Anna Wintall, which I love.

0:17:17.285 --> 0:17:20.325
<v Speaker 1>But Vogue's new head of editorial content Chloe mahl So.

0:17:20.525 --> 0:17:23.405
<v Speaker 1>The author Catherine jess and Morton admitted that her first

0:17:23.445 --> 0:17:26.365
<v Speaker 1>thought when she saw that Marl had been promoted to

0:17:26.405 --> 0:17:29.085
<v Speaker 1>this spot was how is she going to do that

0:17:29.325 --> 0:17:31.085
<v Speaker 1>with a four and a two year old? And she

0:17:31.245 --> 0:17:33.965
<v Speaker 1>was saying this, she said she felt like hard working,

0:17:34.005 --> 0:17:37.205
<v Speaker 1>ambitious mothers have gone into stealth mode in the last decade.

0:17:37.565 --> 0:17:40.165
<v Speaker 4>Min's we talked about how we've tried to stealth mom

0:17:40.245 --> 0:17:42.445
<v Speaker 4>unsuccessfully at work. Have you stealth mum? No?

0:17:42.725 --> 0:17:46.445
<v Speaker 2>I haven't stealth mum. But my most recent boss was

0:17:46.445 --> 0:17:52.085
<v Speaker 2>a stealth mum. Where she was this unbelievably impressive woman

0:17:52.765 --> 0:17:56.365
<v Speaker 2>and I had been working with her for a few

0:17:56.525 --> 0:18:01.685
<v Speaker 2>weeks when she casually just dropped in something about having

0:18:01.725 --> 0:18:06.805
<v Speaker 2>a six month old baby, and I write two two

0:18:07.205 --> 0:18:11.765
<v Speaker 2>very small children. This is a woman, incredible, ambitious, a

0:18:11.925 --> 0:18:15.205
<v Speaker 2>very very large job that was my first example of

0:18:15.245 --> 0:18:16.645
<v Speaker 2>stealth mumming in real life.

0:18:16.845 --> 0:18:18.085
<v Speaker 1>And how did it make you feel?

0:18:18.205 --> 0:18:21.484
<v Speaker 4>Did you feel a little like misled or was it

0:18:21.725 --> 0:18:22.805
<v Speaker 4>just I'm impressed?

0:18:23.525 --> 0:18:23.845
<v Speaker 3>Oh?

0:18:24.165 --> 0:18:26.804
<v Speaker 2>Is it wrong to say I was impressed? It was

0:18:26.885 --> 0:18:30.845
<v Speaker 2>my first example of the subtext being I'm not here

0:18:30.885 --> 0:18:33.325
<v Speaker 2>to talk about my kids. I'm not here to be

0:18:33.405 --> 0:18:36.445
<v Speaker 2>defined by them. I'm not going to be defined as

0:18:36.484 --> 0:18:40.165
<v Speaker 2>a harried, tired working mother. I'm here, I'm standing on

0:18:40.285 --> 0:18:43.965
<v Speaker 2>business and my kids are not my brand. And I

0:18:44.005 --> 0:18:48.365
<v Speaker 2>think that we have seen this cultural shift where probably

0:18:48.525 --> 0:18:50.925
<v Speaker 2>ten years ago it was all about sharinging. Well there

0:18:51.045 --> 0:18:53.485
<v Speaker 2>is still some of that, but a lot of millennial

0:18:53.525 --> 0:18:57.605
<v Speaker 2>parents were over sharing and over there was a raft

0:18:57.645 --> 0:19:00.564
<v Speaker 2>of like mummy blogs showing it this is what it's like,

0:19:00.725 --> 0:19:04.045
<v Speaker 2>this is the real me, very messy kind of parenting.

0:19:04.085 --> 0:19:07.004
<v Speaker 2>But now there is this shift into cool girl stealth

0:19:07.085 --> 0:19:10.045
<v Speaker 2>mums who don't make kids part of their brand and

0:19:10.484 --> 0:19:12.125
<v Speaker 2>who don't seemingly exist.

0:19:12.165 --> 0:19:15.405
<v Speaker 1>But I worry about this though, because I'm like, why

0:19:15.405 --> 0:19:18.484
<v Speaker 1>should I pretend I didn't basically go to war before

0:19:18.525 --> 0:19:21.165
<v Speaker 1>I got to work, Like I've had to battle a

0:19:21.285 --> 0:19:24.285
<v Speaker 1>child into a uniform, get them out the door, get

0:19:24.285 --> 0:19:27.445
<v Speaker 1>myself ready within that deal with a tantrum, like it

0:19:27.484 --> 0:19:29.925
<v Speaker 1>is part of our brand, Like should we be denying

0:19:29.965 --> 0:19:31.805
<v Speaker 1>that part of our self exists?

0:19:32.285 --> 0:19:33.764
<v Speaker 3>Do men make a part of their brand?

0:19:34.045 --> 0:19:35.205
<v Speaker 1>No, because they're not doing that.

0:19:36.165 --> 0:19:39.245
<v Speaker 4>And also I worry that it's just adding more pressure

0:19:39.325 --> 0:19:42.925
<v Speaker 4>onto us to keep this veneer of I'm not going

0:19:42.965 --> 0:19:45.085
<v Speaker 4>to say perfection, because I don't think anyone thinks I

0:19:45.205 --> 0:19:47.605
<v Speaker 4>have a veneer of perfection, but a veneer of just

0:19:47.725 --> 0:19:51.685
<v Speaker 4>kind of like impenetrability and like pretending like our kids

0:19:51.685 --> 0:19:52.324
<v Speaker 4>don't exist.

0:19:52.445 --> 0:19:54.045
<v Speaker 1>It just puts more pressure on us.

0:19:54.445 --> 0:19:57.324
<v Speaker 2>It felt kind of boundaried to me. It felt like

0:19:57.685 --> 0:20:01.445
<v Speaker 2>that's my other life and this is my work life.

0:20:01.165 --> 0:20:03.565
<v Speaker 1>Like almost a relief. I guess that's why I do it.

0:20:03.605 --> 0:20:05.725
<v Speaker 4>Actually, it is a relief to be able to go

0:20:05.765 --> 0:20:09.325
<v Speaker 4>to work and not think about my children while I'm there.

0:20:09.484 --> 0:20:09.885
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:20:09.925 --> 0:20:12.165
<v Speaker 4>The ang the greatest I've ever seen a man is

0:20:12.325 --> 0:20:14.645
<v Speaker 4>I went to a dinner where I was seated next

0:20:14.725 --> 0:20:19.565
<v Speaker 4>to a pediatric pomonologist and I was just making small

0:20:19.605 --> 0:20:21.965
<v Speaker 4>talk with him, and I knew that he had two

0:20:22.005 --> 0:20:24.205
<v Speaker 4>small children at home, and I said to him, Wow,

0:20:24.285 --> 0:20:26.285
<v Speaker 4>that must be a lot, because you got this kids

0:20:26.325 --> 0:20:28.405
<v Speaker 4>at home. And then you're talking to kids at work,

0:20:28.885 --> 0:20:32.445
<v Speaker 4>and he flew into a rage and started telling me

0:20:32.525 --> 0:20:35.645
<v Speaker 4>that his job isn't about talking to children. And I

0:20:35.765 --> 0:20:37.645
<v Speaker 4>was thinking about it afterwards and why he was so

0:20:37.725 --> 0:20:39.405
<v Speaker 4>angry at me, and I think there were two reasons.

0:20:39.445 --> 0:20:42.925
<v Speaker 4>So first is because men are accustomed to being stealth dads,

0:20:42.965 --> 0:20:45.284
<v Speaker 4>like that's the default to be a stealth dad, and

0:20:45.365 --> 0:20:48.685
<v Speaker 4>so to be told like there's some continuation between what

0:20:48.725 --> 0:20:50.285
<v Speaker 4>you do at home and what you do at work,

0:20:50.565 --> 0:20:53.084
<v Speaker 4>it was almost offensive to him. It was almost undermining

0:20:53.085 --> 0:20:56.005
<v Speaker 4>his professionalism in a way that a woman would never

0:20:56.045 --> 0:20:58.005
<v Speaker 4>take offense at that. She may not want to talk

0:20:58.005 --> 0:20:59.645
<v Speaker 4>about it once to your point, but she's not going

0:20:59.645 --> 0:21:01.845
<v Speaker 4>to take offense. And then I think the second reason

0:21:01.845 --> 0:21:04.605
<v Speaker 4>why he took offense was sort of specific to the

0:21:04.645 --> 0:21:07.244
<v Speaker 4>context of the conversation, which was that he thought that

0:21:07.285 --> 0:21:10.564
<v Speaker 4>I was saying that his job was requiring caregiving, it

0:21:10.645 --> 0:21:12.764
<v Speaker 4>was about looking after children, and for him it was

0:21:12.805 --> 0:21:16.565
<v Speaker 4>about solving a problem, not looking after them, not caregiving,

0:21:16.645 --> 0:21:19.685
<v Speaker 4>which is coded as feminine. But it's just interesting to

0:21:19.725 --> 0:21:23.564
<v Speaker 4>reflect on as an example of how for dads, stealth

0:21:23.645 --> 0:21:25.484
<v Speaker 4>dadding is what they've always done.

0:21:25.565 --> 0:21:28.085
<v Speaker 3>It does feel like there's a motherhood penalty in the workplace,

0:21:28.365 --> 0:21:31.685
<v Speaker 3>there's a bias around if you say as a mother,

0:21:31.965 --> 0:21:35.645
<v Speaker 3>I'm a mother, it has connotations of you're not completely

0:21:35.645 --> 0:21:37.685
<v Speaker 3>focused on work, You're going to have to take time

0:21:37.685 --> 0:21:41.205
<v Speaker 3>off for sick kids. So I wonder if stealth mumming

0:21:41.805 --> 0:21:45.245
<v Speaker 3>is in response to that, trying to push back against

0:21:45.605 --> 0:21:46.365
<v Speaker 3>people's bias.

0:21:46.645 --> 0:21:51.165
<v Speaker 4>It's kind of a necessity in order to be taken seriously. Potentially. Yeah,

0:21:51.525 --> 0:21:53.565
<v Speaker 4>I don't know if you've come across this, but there's

0:21:53.565 --> 0:21:57.965
<v Speaker 4>some new thinking around the idea of praise and compliments,

0:21:58.725 --> 0:22:03.085
<v Speaker 4>and this new thinking is that praise itself might be toxic.

0:22:03.325 --> 0:22:07.284
<v Speaker 4>Let me explain. Some studies actually compare excessive praise to

0:22:07.365 --> 0:22:11.605
<v Speaker 4>a dangerous chemical or at aol to manipulate people into

0:22:11.605 --> 0:22:12.405
<v Speaker 4>doing what we want.

0:22:12.605 --> 0:22:14.845
<v Speaker 1>Oh God, they were doing compliments wrong.

0:22:15.245 --> 0:22:18.524
<v Speaker 4>And this came up for me because something happened to

0:22:18.605 --> 0:22:21.085
<v Speaker 4>my child at school recently which kind of upset me.

0:22:21.245 --> 0:22:23.804
<v Speaker 4>And it was around are You Oka Day, which is

0:22:23.845 --> 0:22:28.004
<v Speaker 4>always marked on the second day in September, And what

0:22:28.125 --> 0:22:30.885
<v Speaker 4>happened was that the students in my kids class were

0:22:30.885 --> 0:22:34.605
<v Speaker 4>creating compliment buckets and he and his classmates were encouraged

0:22:34.605 --> 0:22:38.325
<v Speaker 4>to fill these compliment buckets with compliments about other kids

0:22:38.365 --> 0:22:41.205
<v Speaker 4>in the class. Suffice to say, I'm sure you can

0:22:41.605 --> 0:22:43.885
<v Speaker 4>anticipate what ended up happening. There were a lot of

0:22:43.925 --> 0:22:46.965
<v Speaker 4>hurt feelings because kids were comparing how many compliments they

0:22:47.005 --> 0:22:49.525
<v Speaker 4>had compared with other kids, and it basically turned into

0:22:49.525 --> 0:22:53.044
<v Speaker 4>a popularity contest. And the other problem with it is

0:22:53.085 --> 0:22:55.925
<v Speaker 4>that what is a compliment for a child? What is

0:22:55.965 --> 0:22:59.085
<v Speaker 4>okay to compliment a child about? And I realized that

0:22:59.125 --> 0:23:01.365
<v Speaker 4>the whole thing is actually a bit of a minefield,

0:23:01.645 --> 0:23:03.925
<v Speaker 4>and it's really a new development. The first time I

0:23:03.965 --> 0:23:06.925
<v Speaker 4>thought about this was I noticed that gen X parents

0:23:06.965 --> 0:23:09.764
<v Speaker 4>around me were getting very mindful about how they were

0:23:09.805 --> 0:23:12.244
<v Speaker 4>praising their kid kids, and they'd say things like I

0:23:12.285 --> 0:23:15.085
<v Speaker 4>can see you tried so hard to draw this balloon,

0:23:15.325 --> 0:23:17.525
<v Speaker 4>rather than like, what a great picture of a balloon?

0:23:17.885 --> 0:23:20.845
<v Speaker 4>And I sort of inherited that when I had kids,

0:23:20.925 --> 0:23:24.005
<v Speaker 4>and I didn't compliment their appearances, even though sometimes they

0:23:24.045 --> 0:23:27.165
<v Speaker 4>were just wearing a great outfit. And I always talked

0:23:27.165 --> 0:23:32.244
<v Speaker 4>about effort rather than outcome. But don't children deserve the

0:23:32.285 --> 0:23:35.244
<v Speaker 4>same recognition as adults, Like I love a compliment, it

0:23:35.245 --> 0:23:38.445
<v Speaker 4>makes me feel good. Isn't a child simply asking for

0:23:38.565 --> 0:23:41.564
<v Speaker 4>our attention and our recognition and a pat on the

0:23:41.605 --> 0:23:43.325
<v Speaker 4>head for how beautiful.

0:23:42.885 --> 0:23:43.564
<v Speaker 1>A picture is.

0:23:44.165 --> 0:23:47.165
<v Speaker 4>And I'm just wondering, is this another example of millennials

0:23:47.285 --> 0:23:49.844
<v Speaker 4>overthinking everything to the nth degree?

0:23:50.125 --> 0:23:52.445
<v Speaker 1>Yes, yes, it is, okay, this is what we do.

0:23:52.565 --> 0:23:55.485
<v Speaker 1>We overthink everything. And this feels like, now to give

0:23:55.525 --> 0:23:57.685
<v Speaker 1>a child a compliment, you've got to put it through

0:23:57.725 --> 0:24:00.805
<v Speaker 1>a mind map of like does it praise their appearance?

0:24:00.965 --> 0:24:01.165
<v Speaker 4>No?

0:24:01.645 --> 0:24:04.685
<v Speaker 1>Yes, like to get the compliment even out of your mouth,

0:24:05.085 --> 0:24:07.365
<v Speaker 1>Like I know that even people say, don't say good

0:24:07.405 --> 0:24:09.484
<v Speaker 1>boy or good girl, Like you're not meant to do that,

0:24:09.605 --> 0:24:12.804
<v Speaker 1>because that's incururaging them to be really compliant, Like you

0:24:12.845 --> 0:24:15.925
<v Speaker 1>should be saying well done or good effort. You're not

0:24:16.005 --> 0:24:18.405
<v Speaker 1>meant to say good boy or good girl. So it

0:24:18.405 --> 0:24:21.365
<v Speaker 1>feels like every time we think about praising our child,

0:24:21.484 --> 0:24:24.925
<v Speaker 1>then we're stopping ourselves and going, no, but their appearance

0:24:24.965 --> 0:24:27.445
<v Speaker 1>isn't the most beautiful thing about them. I need to

0:24:27.445 --> 0:24:30.365
<v Speaker 1>praise them for being strong or being kind. And it

0:24:30.445 --> 0:24:32.804
<v Speaker 1>just feels like we're exhausting ourselves by just trying to

0:24:32.845 --> 0:24:34.844
<v Speaker 1>be good and tell them that they're great, Like if

0:24:34.885 --> 0:24:36.844
<v Speaker 1>we're not going to tell them they're great, who's going

0:24:36.885 --> 0:24:37.284
<v Speaker 1>to do it.

0:24:37.484 --> 0:24:40.605
<v Speaker 2>Oh, I'm so exhausted by this, So now we can't

0:24:40.605 --> 0:24:45.125
<v Speaker 2>even praise correctly. But you're right, Amelia, overthinking is the

0:24:45.245 --> 0:24:47.205
<v Speaker 2>millennial brand of parenting, right.

0:24:47.484 --> 0:24:48.325
<v Speaker 3>It's not our fault.

0:24:48.365 --> 0:24:53.205
<v Speaker 2>Though we have parenting books, podcasts, newsletters, Instagram accounts all

0:24:53.205 --> 0:24:56.285
<v Speaker 2>telling us that there's a right way to say good job.

0:24:56.725 --> 0:24:59.525
<v Speaker 2>But our parents just had like a cigarette and didn't

0:24:59.525 --> 0:25:00.125
<v Speaker 2>think about it.

0:25:00.325 --> 0:25:04.885
<v Speaker 3>So of course we're hyper aware. It's how we've been conditioned.

0:25:05.285 --> 0:25:08.245
<v Speaker 4>And I also want to inject a note here that

0:25:08.525 --> 0:25:12.604
<v Speaker 4>praise it does make people we feel good. And on

0:25:12.645 --> 0:25:14.445
<v Speaker 4>the other hand, I know I mentioned that the new

0:25:14.484 --> 0:25:16.645
<v Speaker 4>thinking is that it's kind of like a toxic chemical,

0:25:17.165 --> 0:25:20.245
<v Speaker 4>but there's also studies that show that people who say

0:25:20.245 --> 0:25:22.685
<v Speaker 4>they were praised a lot by their parents are more

0:25:22.805 --> 0:25:26.565
<v Speaker 4>likely to be happy. And there's even a correlation between

0:25:26.645 --> 0:25:30.245
<v Speaker 4>income and how much praise people received as children, which

0:25:30.325 --> 0:25:31.524
<v Speaker 4>is fascinating.

0:25:31.005 --> 0:25:33.004
<v Speaker 1>Because that's what I'm saying as well. There's this woman

0:25:33.045 --> 0:25:35.165
<v Speaker 1>I follow on TikTok, you know, when I'm meant to

0:25:35.165 --> 0:25:37.125
<v Speaker 1>be asleep and I just scroll for hours on end,

0:25:37.405 --> 0:25:39.885
<v Speaker 1>called doctor Chelsea and she said, you're meant to give

0:25:39.885 --> 0:25:43.525
<v Speaker 1>a hundred pieces of praise a day to a day,

0:25:43.725 --> 0:25:47.405
<v Speaker 1>each child, each child, each child, And she was saying

0:25:47.445 --> 0:25:49.804
<v Speaker 1>it's because if all you're doing is correction and direction,

0:25:49.925 --> 0:25:52.085
<v Speaker 1>like if all you're doing is saying no, don't do that, no,

0:25:52.205 --> 0:25:54.885
<v Speaker 1>get off that, put your shoes on, Like, all they're

0:25:54.925 --> 0:25:57.405
<v Speaker 1>hearing from our mouths is things that they need to

0:25:57.405 --> 0:25:59.445
<v Speaker 1>do or things that they need to not do. So

0:25:59.484 --> 0:26:02.805
<v Speaker 1>she was saying, you need to do really micro compliments

0:26:02.805 --> 0:26:04.564
<v Speaker 1>to them, so things like you put your shoes on,

0:26:04.645 --> 0:26:07.565
<v Speaker 1>well done, you came down for dinner, well done. No.

0:26:07.685 --> 0:26:10.764
<v Speaker 4>I wonder how that translates into the workplace too, because

0:26:10.845 --> 0:26:13.764
<v Speaker 4>maybe it's like also a good management technique to be

0:26:13.805 --> 0:26:15.565
<v Speaker 4>praising everyone one hundred times a day.

0:26:15.685 --> 0:26:17.645
<v Speaker 1>But can you imagine that would mean that we're saying

0:26:17.685 --> 0:26:20.804
<v Speaker 1>things like wow, that's an amazing font you used in

0:26:20.845 --> 0:26:24.085
<v Speaker 1>that deck, and wow you circled back when you said

0:26:24.125 --> 0:26:27.885
<v Speaker 1>you'd circle back and close the loop. Good on you. Yeah,

0:26:28.045 --> 0:26:29.365
<v Speaker 1>Like please.

0:26:29.445 --> 0:26:31.445
<v Speaker 2>I for one would like more praise in the workplace.

0:26:31.484 --> 0:26:33.325
<v Speaker 2>I don't think there's enough. There's a lot of stick

0:26:33.365 --> 0:26:36.405
<v Speaker 2>and not heaps of carrot in workplaces, and I think

0:26:36.445 --> 0:26:38.725
<v Speaker 2>it's a good cultural thing to tell people when they've

0:26:38.725 --> 0:26:39.565
<v Speaker 2>done a good job.

0:26:39.605 --> 0:26:42.245
<v Speaker 1>Which we mentioned Herem's that you look beautiful and you're

0:26:42.285 --> 0:26:45.165
<v Speaker 1>doing such a good job today, and you're so strong.

0:26:44.925 --> 0:26:48.445
<v Speaker 3>My beauty. I praise the effort. I tried really hard today.

0:26:48.484 --> 0:26:50.445
<v Speaker 2>I did a lot of research, and I did research

0:26:50.484 --> 0:26:52.165
<v Speaker 2>on this, and I think the point we're missing is

0:26:52.805 --> 0:26:55.245
<v Speaker 2>over praise, excessive praise.

0:26:55.405 --> 0:26:56.245
<v Speaker 3>This is the problem.

0:26:56.325 --> 0:26:59.965
<v Speaker 2>And the research says that over praising kids can turn

0:27:00.405 --> 0:27:04.085
<v Speaker 2>them into external validation junkies, and it turns them into

0:27:04.085 --> 0:27:07.405
<v Speaker 2>doing things for extrinsic praise rather than like the intrinsic

0:27:07.484 --> 0:27:11.324
<v Speaker 2>motivation of working hard. It also diminishes rezilily. So if

0:27:11.405 --> 0:27:14.925
<v Speaker 2>kids have grown up with constantly wow, you ate your

0:27:15.045 --> 0:27:19.044
<v Speaker 2>vegetables so amazing, or everything you do is incredible, then

0:27:19.045 --> 0:27:21.325
<v Speaker 2>the first time they hit a real critic, or if

0:27:21.365 --> 0:27:23.965
<v Speaker 2>the first time they get feedback, the first time they

0:27:24.045 --> 0:27:26.725
<v Speaker 2>even just get sort of a neutral silence or not

0:27:26.805 --> 0:27:29.365
<v Speaker 2>someone pumping their ties, it can feel really crushing and

0:27:29.405 --> 0:27:31.885
<v Speaker 2>really derailing. And I think that we do see that

0:27:32.005 --> 0:27:34.565
<v Speaker 2>in the workplace. There is a generation here that can't

0:27:34.565 --> 0:27:38.605
<v Speaker 2>take feedback and can't handle it when you're not pumping

0:27:38.605 --> 0:27:39.845
<v Speaker 2>their tires every five minutes.

0:27:40.005 --> 0:27:43.245
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, but Mon's I did my research for this segment too,

0:27:43.325 --> 0:27:46.125
<v Speaker 4>and deserve praise and recognition for that, And the studies

0:27:46.205 --> 0:27:48.845
<v Speaker 4>I found said the opposite. So now I think the

0:27:48.925 --> 0:27:52.405
<v Speaker 4>point is that that's why we're overthinking it, because there's

0:27:52.445 --> 0:27:54.685
<v Speaker 4>so much data on both sides. Do you praise them

0:27:54.685 --> 0:27:56.405
<v Speaker 4>one hundred times a day? Do you make sure that

0:27:56.445 --> 0:27:59.645
<v Speaker 4>you don't praise them too much? And then ultimately, maybe

0:27:59.765 --> 0:28:02.885
<v Speaker 4>what we previously might have thought was an instinctive act

0:28:03.005 --> 0:28:06.285
<v Speaker 4>to praise or not praise has instead turned into something

0:28:06.325 --> 0:28:08.245
<v Speaker 4>that we have to intellectualize.

0:28:08.445 --> 0:28:10.484
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think we just need to tell people and

0:28:10.484 --> 0:28:13.605
<v Speaker 1>they look nice and move on. So now I've brought

0:28:13.645 --> 0:28:15.804
<v Speaker 1>you my favorite video from the internet this week, and

0:28:15.845 --> 0:28:17.525
<v Speaker 1>I want you to have a listen. It's a woman

0:28:17.685 --> 0:28:20.965
<v Speaker 1>named Chelsea who's just become my new hero. Here she is,

0:28:21.445 --> 0:28:22.805
<v Speaker 1>we don't do bath toys.

0:28:22.805 --> 0:28:25.044
<v Speaker 5>Over here, my baby does not do bath toys.

0:28:25.045 --> 0:28:27.325
<v Speaker 1>You want to know why? Too much bullshit?

0:28:27.525 --> 0:28:30.925
<v Speaker 5>Okay, bad time is to get in, wash your ass,

0:28:31.005 --> 0:28:33.565
<v Speaker 5>get out. That's exactly what we do. We get in,

0:28:33.685 --> 0:28:35.965
<v Speaker 5>we wash our ass, we get out because there's two

0:28:36.005 --> 0:28:38.645
<v Speaker 5>minutes of a hassle with these toys. You load the

0:28:38.725 --> 0:28:41.445
<v Speaker 5>toys in, you get the toys out. You dry the

0:28:41.565 --> 0:28:44.245
<v Speaker 5>toys off, you hope the toys don't moved. Gotta keep

0:28:44.325 --> 0:28:46.805
<v Speaker 5>washing all the toys. I already gotta wash this toy.

0:28:46.885 --> 0:28:50.045
<v Speaker 5>I'm not adding a new group of toys that specifically

0:28:50.045 --> 0:28:52.125
<v Speaker 5>get wet and most of the time stay with that.

0:28:52.245 --> 0:28:53.405
<v Speaker 1>I also got to wash.

0:28:53.605 --> 0:28:56.005
<v Speaker 5>That's extra work for what play with your toys when

0:28:56.005 --> 0:28:56.685
<v Speaker 5>you get out the bat.

0:28:58.245 --> 0:29:01.405
<v Speaker 1>I love Chelsea so much. I stepped on a bluey

0:29:01.405 --> 0:29:04.445
<v Speaker 1>toy and a dinosaur last night in my shower, so

0:29:04.485 --> 0:29:07.725
<v Speaker 1>she has now become my new icon. I'm doing less

0:29:07.805 --> 0:29:09.485
<v Speaker 1>toys in the shower and the bar.

0:29:09.925 --> 0:29:11.165
<v Speaker 3>I love this from Chelsea.

0:29:11.325 --> 0:29:16.085
<v Speaker 2>But for people that have neurodivergent kids who like deep pressure,

0:29:16.565 --> 0:29:19.845
<v Speaker 2>bathtime can be really important. And bath time is, as

0:29:19.885 --> 0:29:22.645
<v Speaker 2>you say, Amelia, the calming thing. You might be a

0:29:22.725 --> 0:29:24.925
<v Speaker 2>parent that has a kid that has multiple barths a

0:29:24.965 --> 0:29:27.005
<v Speaker 2>day because it's quite regulating for them.

0:29:27.045 --> 0:29:28.765
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, that's just me being the fun police.

0:29:28.805 --> 0:29:32.285
<v Speaker 2>And I know that Chelsea is not against bathtime per se.

0:29:32.485 --> 0:29:35.845
<v Speaker 2>She's pro bath, just anti bath toy.

0:29:36.165 --> 0:29:38.805
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, she's just saying just get them in there, get

0:29:38.845 --> 0:29:41.045
<v Speaker 1>them clean, and get out. I like it.

0:29:41.045 --> 0:29:43.965
<v Speaker 2>It's effiicient or business. But can I also give you

0:29:43.965 --> 0:29:47.565
<v Speaker 2>guys an amazing hack for bath time. So I fell

0:29:47.605 --> 0:29:49.805
<v Speaker 2>into this trap where both times went on and on

0:29:49.805 --> 0:29:51.725
<v Speaker 2>and on because I could never get them out. I

0:29:51.765 --> 0:29:55.325
<v Speaker 2>went to Bunnings and I bought pond lights like ten dollar.

0:29:55.405 --> 0:29:57.685
<v Speaker 2>They're a little disc and you have a remote that

0:29:57.685 --> 0:29:59.565
<v Speaker 2>comes with it and it turns them into different colors

0:29:59.965 --> 0:30:01.605
<v Speaker 2>and I put them on the bottom of the bath

0:30:01.645 --> 0:30:03.645
<v Speaker 2>and the kids are obsessed with them because it lights

0:30:03.725 --> 0:30:05.685
<v Speaker 2>up the bath. So you turn the lights off, you

0:30:05.725 --> 0:30:08.765
<v Speaker 2>put the pond lights on, and then when you've had enough,

0:30:09.045 --> 0:30:11.325
<v Speaker 2>you take your remote and you turn the pond light

0:30:11.405 --> 0:30:14.005
<v Speaker 2>to red and you say, oh far, time's finished. Like

0:30:14.085 --> 0:30:15.845
<v Speaker 2>the lights turned to red. That means we've got to

0:30:15.845 --> 0:30:18.965
<v Speaker 2>get out. Just works, They're just something in their brain goes,

0:30:19.005 --> 0:30:20.565
<v Speaker 2>oh shit, the light's red out.

0:30:20.565 --> 0:30:23.085
<v Speaker 1>We get that's very good Monds, but that's another toy

0:30:23.205 --> 0:30:26.645
<v Speaker 1>for the bum. You're going against Chelsea's advice. I am

0:30:26.645 --> 0:30:30.285
<v Speaker 1>taking Chelsea's advice. I'm taking everything out and only adding bubbles,

0:30:30.285 --> 0:30:32.605
<v Speaker 1>and I guarantee it will be better. That's what I'm doing.

0:30:34.325 --> 0:30:38.245
<v Speaker 2>There's a tiny internet feud on Facebook that I would

0:30:38.365 --> 0:30:41.325
<v Speaker 2>like to bring to your attention that I discovered this week.

0:30:41.885 --> 0:30:44.445
<v Speaker 2>So move over Hottest one hundred because the ABC are

0:30:44.485 --> 0:30:47.325
<v Speaker 2>running a competition for the Hottest one hundred books of

0:30:47.365 --> 0:30:50.805
<v Speaker 2>the twenty first century, and it listed Where Is the

0:30:50.845 --> 0:30:51.525
<v Speaker 2>Green Sheep?

0:30:52.005 --> 0:30:54.645
<v Speaker 3>By Mem Fox a classic.

0:30:54.485 --> 0:30:58.085
<v Speaker 2>Total classic, but it left one thing off the illustrator

0:30:58.205 --> 0:31:02.845
<v Speaker 2>Judy horror Check. So this week she wrote on her Facebook, Hey, ABC,

0:31:03.765 --> 0:31:06.485
<v Speaker 2>you have Where is the Green Sheep listed as by

0:31:06.565 --> 0:31:10.485
<v Speaker 2>mem Fox alone? You know it's actually by Memfox and

0:31:10.525 --> 0:31:13.485
<v Speaker 2>me right, And then she goes on to say in

0:31:13.485 --> 0:31:16.245
<v Speaker 2>the comments, you know, the people that do the pictures

0:31:16.245 --> 0:31:19.765
<v Speaker 2>in picture books are frequently left off, like we're used

0:31:19.805 --> 0:31:23.685
<v Speaker 2>to it, but it also drives us nuts. So Judy

0:31:23.725 --> 0:31:26.965
<v Speaker 2>Horrichek has had just about enough of illustrators being overlooked,

0:31:27.085 --> 0:31:28.605
<v Speaker 2>and I just want to have a moment for the

0:31:28.685 --> 0:31:29.885
<v Speaker 2>illustrators of children's books.

0:31:30.125 --> 0:31:32.085
<v Speaker 4>Such a good point, I'm ashamed to say. I hadn't

0:31:32.085 --> 0:31:35.245
<v Speaker 4>even thought about this until I came across this item,

0:31:35.405 --> 0:31:39.285
<v Speaker 4>and then I started to think about how important illustrations

0:31:39.365 --> 0:31:42.525
<v Speaker 4>are in children's books and how they stir feeling in

0:31:42.645 --> 0:31:45.885
<v Speaker 4>children that they never forget, Like where would Roll Dhal

0:31:45.965 --> 0:31:48.645
<v Speaker 4>be without the Quentin Blake line drawings exactly?

0:31:48.725 --> 0:31:51.485
<v Speaker 1>Like the kids can't read the words. The thing that's

0:31:51.565 --> 0:31:53.965
<v Speaker 1>drawing them into the book is the illustrations. Like, I

0:31:54.045 --> 0:31:56.805
<v Speaker 1>feel so bad that I've never thought about this before.

0:31:56.845 --> 0:31:59.125
<v Speaker 1>Like I could not tell you the names of the

0:31:59.165 --> 0:32:01.365
<v Speaker 1>illustrators on my daughter's books, and yet we read them

0:32:01.365 --> 0:32:03.205
<v Speaker 1>every night. But I should. Now I'm going to pay

0:32:03.245 --> 0:32:03.925
<v Speaker 1>attention to this.

0:32:04.725 --> 0:32:07.205
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I read this amazing piece in The Guardian about

0:32:07.405 --> 0:32:10.885
<v Speaker 2>illustrations and the history of illustrations and what was that

0:32:11.005 --> 0:32:15.405
<v Speaker 2>Illustrations are as memory evoking as smells or songs, So

0:32:15.445 --> 0:32:17.365
<v Speaker 2>you see things as a kid and it will stick

0:32:17.565 --> 0:32:18.565
<v Speaker 2>with you for life.

0:32:18.685 --> 0:32:20.525
<v Speaker 3>That's so true, Stacy.

0:32:20.605 --> 0:32:23.605
<v Speaker 2>If kids are visual learners, you know, we've spent all

0:32:23.605 --> 0:32:25.565
<v Speaker 2>this time trying to get them off of iPads.

0:32:25.605 --> 0:32:27.365
<v Speaker 3>They're drawn to visuals all the time.

0:32:27.445 --> 0:32:30.045
<v Speaker 2>Our illustrators actually the real rock stars of our childhoods,

0:32:30.045 --> 0:32:31.285
<v Speaker 2>and we've just been ignoring them.

0:32:31.485 --> 0:32:33.525
<v Speaker 1>They really are, Like we need to pour one out

0:32:33.565 --> 0:32:35.445
<v Speaker 1>for them now, Like they are the reason that our

0:32:35.525 --> 0:32:37.685
<v Speaker 1>kids even drawn to books in the first place. Like

0:32:37.725 --> 0:32:40.285
<v Speaker 1>I guarantee, if they were just black and white words

0:32:40.285 --> 0:32:42.165
<v Speaker 1>on the page, they're not going to sit there for

0:32:42.325 --> 0:32:44.285
<v Speaker 1>more than two seconds. So yeah, we need to pour

0:32:44.325 --> 0:32:45.485
<v Speaker 1>one out for the illustrators.

0:32:45.725 --> 0:32:49.165
<v Speaker 2>I reckon great illustrators, like as you said, Quentin Blake,

0:32:49.685 --> 0:32:52.445
<v Speaker 2>like Helen Oxbury, who did We're going on a bear Hunt?

0:32:53.205 --> 0:32:56.365
<v Speaker 2>They shape the stories as much as the writers do.

0:32:56.645 --> 0:32:58.845
<v Speaker 2>You know, We're going on a bear Hunt was originally

0:32:58.885 --> 0:33:01.445
<v Speaker 2>supposed to be about a line of kings and queens

0:33:01.525 --> 0:33:04.245
<v Speaker 2>going on a bear hunt, but Helen Oxenbury turned it

0:33:04.285 --> 0:33:07.045
<v Speaker 2>into like this regular family squelching through the mud, and

0:33:07.045 --> 0:33:09.525
<v Speaker 2>that's just where the beauty is. And this article also

0:33:09.645 --> 0:33:12.645
<v Speaker 2>said that kids love chaos in illustrations.

0:33:12.685 --> 0:33:14.844
<v Speaker 3>They fixate on messy.

0:33:14.725 --> 0:33:18.365
<v Speaker 2>Disruptive moments in books so peas spilling out or the

0:33:18.405 --> 0:33:21.405
<v Speaker 2>tiger that came to tea drinking all the water out

0:33:21.405 --> 0:33:24.005
<v Speaker 2>of the tap, and they find a lot of joy

0:33:24.125 --> 0:33:27.245
<v Speaker 2>in the disorder, and that these illustrations can also help

0:33:27.285 --> 0:33:31.205
<v Speaker 2>them deal with big feelings chaos, loneliness, loss or anger

0:33:31.685 --> 0:33:34.645
<v Speaker 2>all through the pictures much more than words can. The

0:33:34.765 --> 0:33:37.685
<v Speaker 2>upshot of this is that I went onto the ABC

0:33:37.805 --> 0:33:42.005
<v Speaker 2>Book's website. They have updated the entry for mem Fox.

0:33:42.085 --> 0:33:46.085
<v Speaker 2>They have included Judy horrorcheck. She gets my vote, Judy,

0:33:46.245 --> 0:33:48.725
<v Speaker 2>we love you. I also want to shout out to

0:33:48.805 --> 0:33:53.045
<v Speaker 2>Deborah n Island for drawing my favorite illustrations in Mulgarbill's bicycle.

0:33:53.325 --> 0:33:56.285
<v Speaker 2>And also she did that hippopotamus that goes on.

0:33:57.605 --> 0:34:01.685
<v Speaker 3>That is brilliant hctics one of the bed illustrator right

0:34:02.085 --> 0:34:02.965
<v Speaker 3>such range.

0:34:03.245 --> 0:34:05.605
<v Speaker 2>So thank you illustrators, thank you for bringing the magic.

0:34:06.445 --> 0:34:08.165
<v Speaker 2>To wrap up today's show, we're going to just share

0:34:08.205 --> 0:34:11.445
<v Speaker 2>the things that we are loving sick, so the stuff

0:34:11.484 --> 0:34:13.004
<v Speaker 2>you might text to your friends or put in the

0:34:13.085 --> 0:34:15.925
<v Speaker 2>Mums group, Chat Amelia, what's on your list.

0:34:16.364 --> 0:34:19.004
<v Speaker 4>This is going to sound strange, but my recommendation this

0:34:19.044 --> 0:34:24.285
<v Speaker 4>week is getting the newspaper. Oh. I subscribed to my

0:34:24.364 --> 0:34:27.644
<v Speaker 4>local paper to have it delivered Monday through Sunday, and

0:34:28.165 --> 0:34:31.404
<v Speaker 4>it is bringing me such joy and delight. And I've

0:34:31.444 --> 0:34:34.084
<v Speaker 4>tried to think about why that is. I think it's

0:34:34.125 --> 0:34:37.804
<v Speaker 4>because when you read the news in the newspaper, it's

0:34:37.884 --> 0:34:41.404
<v Speaker 4>giving come closer, it's saying, come here, let's share this experience.

0:34:41.444 --> 0:34:43.564
<v Speaker 4>If you read the news on your phone and your

0:34:43.604 --> 0:34:47.244
<v Speaker 4>droom scrolling, that says go away. It says I don't

0:34:47.245 --> 0:34:49.444
<v Speaker 4>want to be disturbed. And there's something about the act

0:34:49.444 --> 0:34:52.524
<v Speaker 4>of scrolling where it doesn't invite people in in the

0:34:52.524 --> 0:34:54.684
<v Speaker 4>way that a big newspaper does, and a.

0:34:54.725 --> 0:34:58.204
<v Speaker 1>Newspaper's a novelty now to them, like they don't see that,

0:34:58.325 --> 0:34:59.045
<v Speaker 1>so how cool.

0:34:59.285 --> 0:35:01.204
<v Speaker 4>There's so many nice things about it, like you can

0:35:01.245 --> 0:35:04.285
<v Speaker 4>practice numbers and talk about numbers on the world weather page.

0:35:04.765 --> 0:35:08.805
<v Speaker 4>You can do the word games together with a pen

0:35:08.884 --> 0:35:10.165
<v Speaker 4>and paper so fun.

0:35:10.444 --> 0:35:12.685
<v Speaker 3>You can draw mustaches and all the world leaders.

0:35:13.524 --> 0:35:19.164
<v Speaker 4>And I think it's modeling good information hygiene, which I

0:35:19.165 --> 0:35:22.524
<v Speaker 4>think is going to be increasingly a topic of conversation

0:35:22.685 --> 0:35:26.325
<v Speaker 4>going forward with AI and everything else that's going on.

0:35:26.685 --> 0:35:29.245
<v Speaker 4>And I just think overall, it makes me feel calmer

0:35:29.484 --> 0:35:33.285
<v Speaker 4>because when I read the newspaper, it's a finite experience.

0:35:33.364 --> 0:35:34.725
<v Speaker 4>I can get to the end of it and I

0:35:34.725 --> 0:35:36.924
<v Speaker 4>can feel like, Okay, I know what's going on. I

0:35:36.964 --> 0:35:39.044
<v Speaker 4>don't need to keep doom scrolling. I don't need to

0:35:39.044 --> 0:35:40.604
<v Speaker 4>read all the news in the world. This is the

0:35:40.645 --> 0:35:43.124
<v Speaker 4>news that I need to know today. So I think

0:35:43.165 --> 0:35:47.605
<v Speaker 4>it's been a really nice experience, not just for my kids,

0:35:47.645 --> 0:35:48.524
<v Speaker 4>but also for me.

0:35:48.964 --> 0:35:51.964
<v Speaker 2>I love that it's so intentional, and it's also you

0:35:52.004 --> 0:35:54.124
<v Speaker 2>can't skip around all over the place like you can

0:35:54.205 --> 0:35:54.725
<v Speaker 2>on a phone.

0:35:54.765 --> 0:35:58.245
<v Speaker 3>It's just the one single tasking. Love it. What about you, Stacey?

0:35:58.524 --> 0:36:01.924
<v Speaker 1>So mine this week is a docco that I cannot

0:36:02.044 --> 0:36:04.964
<v Speaker 1>stop thinking about. Have you guys watched Unknown Number The

0:36:05.044 --> 0:36:11.484
<v Speaker 1>Catfish Story on Netflix? Stacy obsessed? Yes, mons no?

0:36:11.884 --> 0:36:12.725
<v Speaker 3>Is it a true crime?

0:36:13.165 --> 0:36:17.285
<v Speaker 1>Yes? True crime documentary my favorite kind. So I promise

0:36:17.285 --> 0:36:19.044
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to spoil it for you. I'll just

0:36:19.084 --> 0:36:20.964
<v Speaker 1>give you top line. But if you want to listen

0:36:21.004 --> 0:36:22.524
<v Speaker 1>to more and you have watched it, Mom and Me

0:36:22.564 --> 0:36:24.605
<v Speaker 1>are allowed did a subs episode on it this week.

0:36:24.685 --> 0:36:27.364
<v Speaker 1>So it's a thirteen year old girl, Lauren Lacari. She

0:36:27.444 --> 0:36:30.445
<v Speaker 1>lives in this tiny town in Michigan, like couple hundred people.

0:36:30.884 --> 0:36:33.485
<v Speaker 1>And Lauren starts stating a boy in her class named Owen,

0:36:33.765 --> 0:36:36.765
<v Speaker 1>and that's when the messages start. So she starts getting

0:36:37.245 --> 0:36:40.485
<v Speaker 1>up to forty to fifty abusive messages to her phone

0:36:40.484 --> 0:36:43.245
<v Speaker 1>a day from an unknown number, and so does Owen.

0:36:43.444 --> 0:36:45.844
<v Speaker 1>And then they start coming to different people, but they

0:36:45.884 --> 0:36:48.164
<v Speaker 1>are the main ones that start receiving these messages. This

0:36:48.285 --> 0:36:51.644
<v Speaker 1>goes on for fifteen months until they finally figure out

0:36:51.645 --> 0:36:54.684
<v Speaker 1>who it is. So it's satisfying in that you will

0:36:54.685 --> 0:36:58.124
<v Speaker 1>find out who it is, and it is infuriating when

0:36:58.165 --> 0:37:01.004
<v Speaker 1>you find out who it is. But I think the

0:37:01.044 --> 0:37:04.685
<v Speaker 1>most interesting part about watching it and I'm sure you'll agree, Amelia,

0:37:04.725 --> 0:37:06.444
<v Speaker 1>Like the question you have when you're watching it is

0:37:06.685 --> 0:37:09.004
<v Speaker 1>why didn't they take the phones off the kids? Like

0:37:09.044 --> 0:37:12.364
<v Speaker 1>why didn't they remove their And it's such an interesting

0:37:12.444 --> 0:37:16.444
<v Speaker 1>reflection on society today in that the other parents of

0:37:16.444 --> 0:37:18.444
<v Speaker 1>the kids at the school said, well, no, we don't

0:37:18.484 --> 0:37:20.564
<v Speaker 1>want our kids phones taken away because we want to

0:37:20.564 --> 0:37:21.884
<v Speaker 1>know where they are. We want to be able to

0:37:21.964 --> 0:37:24.124
<v Speaker 1>track them and to be able to contact them. And

0:37:24.165 --> 0:37:26.204
<v Speaker 1>that's actually something that we touched on in last week's

0:37:26.245 --> 0:37:28.604
<v Speaker 1>episode when we were talking about phone tracking. It very

0:37:28.685 --> 0:37:31.884
<v Speaker 1>much plays into that, like would you track your kids?

0:37:31.884 --> 0:37:33.765
<v Speaker 1>And why do we want to track our kids? So

0:37:33.884 --> 0:37:36.084
<v Speaker 1>this poor girl had to go to school every day

0:37:36.245 --> 0:37:38.644
<v Speaker 1>knowing these messages were going to come through, and it

0:37:38.685 --> 0:37:40.484
<v Speaker 1>was all because the other parents wouldn't get on board

0:37:40.484 --> 0:37:42.205
<v Speaker 1>and support it. It was a bit of an aha

0:37:42.285 --> 0:37:45.484
<v Speaker 1>moment for me because I've find that conversation around phones

0:37:45.604 --> 0:37:48.884
<v Speaker 1>and children it's often about well, the kids don't want

0:37:48.924 --> 0:37:51.444
<v Speaker 1>to give the phone up because they're addicted, and that

0:37:51.484 --> 0:37:53.765
<v Speaker 1>may or may not be true. But what this documentary

0:37:53.844 --> 0:37:58.484
<v Speaker 1>shows is that parents also feel ambivalent about taking their

0:37:58.524 --> 0:38:00.444
<v Speaker 1>phones away from their kids because it's a way to

0:38:00.524 --> 0:38:02.564
<v Speaker 1>keep in touch with their kids and keep in some

0:38:02.645 --> 0:38:05.045
<v Speaker 1>ways control over their kids. And it was a reminder

0:38:05.125 --> 0:38:09.124
<v Speaker 1>that that dynamic goes both ways. Yeah, and when the

0:38:09.205 --> 0:38:13.044
<v Speaker 1>reveal happens, it's so satisfying. Mons, Like there is videos

0:38:13.084 --> 0:38:15.645
<v Speaker 1>all over the internet. You will scream. You will scream

0:38:15.685 --> 0:38:17.484
<v Speaker 1>out loud when you find out who it is. It's

0:38:17.524 --> 0:38:22.685
<v Speaker 1>that satisfying. So please watch for principle, it's the teaching

0:38:22.765 --> 0:38:24.404
<v Speaker 1>a word. You'll have to watch.

0:38:25.125 --> 0:38:29.884
<v Speaker 2>It's the teacher and it's an exercise in resilience. Everybody fails.

0:38:30.645 --> 0:38:31.965
<v Speaker 1>Mon's what's yours this week?

0:38:32.325 --> 0:38:35.164
<v Speaker 2>I have a viral two ingredient dinner for lazy people

0:38:35.205 --> 0:38:37.484
<v Speaker 2>who hate cooking to me ingredient.

0:38:37.685 --> 0:38:38.725
<v Speaker 1>Please give it to me.

0:38:39.165 --> 0:38:40.404
<v Speaker 3>It's changed my life.

0:38:40.484 --> 0:38:43.765
<v Speaker 2>I can't stop talking about this and telling everybody about this.

0:38:43.924 --> 0:38:47.044
<v Speaker 2>So I stole it from the Lee's and Sarah podcast,

0:38:47.645 --> 0:38:51.725
<v Speaker 2>which for transparency reasons, I work on this show. But

0:38:51.805 --> 0:38:53.964
<v Speaker 2>this recipe has gone viral in a way that we've

0:38:54.004 --> 0:38:55.525
<v Speaker 2>never seen anything do before.

0:38:56.044 --> 0:38:59.005
<v Speaker 3>People are losing their minds. It's called the triple Bee.

0:38:59.564 --> 0:39:02.844
<v Speaker 3>All you need to do is get a beef bowler

0:39:03.044 --> 0:39:05.965
<v Speaker 3>blade from the supermarket. It's called a beef bowler blade.

0:39:05.964 --> 0:39:06.444
<v Speaker 3>A triple be.

0:39:06.484 --> 0:39:07.685
<v Speaker 1>It's not like a cut of meat.

0:39:08.044 --> 0:39:10.165
<v Speaker 3>It's a cut of meat. It's like a big roast.

0:39:10.404 --> 0:39:11.685
<v Speaker 3>It's called beef bowl blade.

0:39:11.805 --> 0:39:12.524
<v Speaker 1>Okay, got it.

0:39:12.604 --> 0:39:17.044
<v Speaker 2>And then a jar of Cha Sus sauce. It comes

0:39:17.084 --> 0:39:20.444
<v Speaker 2>in a red jar. What you do is you turn

0:39:20.484 --> 0:39:23.044
<v Speaker 2>on your slow cooker, you dump the triple be in it.

0:39:23.404 --> 0:39:27.804
<v Speaker 2>You pour over the entire jar of Chassius sauce, put

0:39:27.805 --> 0:39:30.924
<v Speaker 2>the lid on, put it on low for eight to

0:39:31.004 --> 0:39:32.485
<v Speaker 2>ten hours, and walk away.

0:39:32.725 --> 0:39:33.244
<v Speaker 3>That is it.

0:39:33.364 --> 0:39:37.164
<v Speaker 2>No browning, no nothing, two things, triple b Cha su,

0:39:37.404 --> 0:39:40.564
<v Speaker 2>walk away and at the end what you will have

0:39:41.084 --> 0:39:46.444
<v Speaker 2>is the most amazing, succulent, delicious pulley a party like

0:39:46.765 --> 0:39:48.805
<v Speaker 2>Chinese infused beef.

0:39:49.004 --> 0:39:53.044
<v Speaker 4>What is the charge eating a meal a succulent Chinese me.

0:39:53.765 --> 0:39:56.164
<v Speaker 2>That you could serve with rice. You could put it

0:39:56.245 --> 0:39:58.765
<v Speaker 2>on like a white roll with some kalslaur in it.

0:39:58.765 --> 0:40:02.004
<v Speaker 2>It's just amazing. It's become a weekly staple in this

0:40:02.084 --> 0:40:04.085
<v Speaker 2>house because it's so ridiculously easy.

0:40:04.364 --> 0:40:04.524
<v Speaker 4>YEA.

0:40:04.884 --> 0:40:07.084
<v Speaker 1>Nothing insides. Rage in me is when you see a

0:40:07.125 --> 0:40:09.125
<v Speaker 1>slow cooker recipe and it says you've got a brown

0:40:09.364 --> 0:40:12.605
<v Speaker 1>in a pan fur, I might No, I'm not doing

0:40:12.645 --> 0:40:14.564
<v Speaker 1>that because I'll just book it in the pan. So

0:40:14.645 --> 0:40:15.964
<v Speaker 1>this is great, love it.

0:40:16.685 --> 0:40:18.724
<v Speaker 2>That's all we have time for on Parenting out Loud

0:40:18.765 --> 0:40:21.964
<v Speaker 2>this week. We are so happy that you're here in

0:40:22.044 --> 0:40:24.725
<v Speaker 2>our new home in this feed, so thank you for

0:40:24.805 --> 0:40:27.724
<v Speaker 2>hitting the follow button. Actually, we do need a name

0:40:27.805 --> 0:40:29.444
<v Speaker 2>for our tribe of smart parents.

0:40:29.844 --> 0:40:30.724
<v Speaker 3>What can we call them?

0:40:30.884 --> 0:40:37.765
<v Speaker 2>Maybe poles call yeah the polyp Please pout louders like

0:40:37.884 --> 0:40:38.964
<v Speaker 2>parenting out Louders.

0:40:39.165 --> 0:40:39.805
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I like that?

0:40:40.125 --> 0:40:40.444
<v Speaker 4>All right?

0:40:40.524 --> 0:40:43.644
<v Speaker 2>Well, before you go, we are so goddamn thirsty for

0:40:43.685 --> 0:40:46.884
<v Speaker 2>praise here. Maybe our parents did not praise us enough,

0:40:47.004 --> 0:40:49.244
<v Speaker 2>and frankly it shows. So if you've got any spare

0:40:49.285 --> 0:40:52.205
<v Speaker 2>praise rattling around that you're taking off your kids now,

0:40:52.404 --> 0:40:54.724
<v Speaker 2>we'd love to have it. So the way you can

0:40:54.765 --> 0:40:57.964
<v Speaker 2>do it is drop us a review on Apple Podcasts.

0:40:58.044 --> 0:41:00.165
<v Speaker 2>It actually helps other people find the show because the

0:41:00.205 --> 0:41:03.485
<v Speaker 2>Apple charts work in this way where it's this weird

0:41:03.604 --> 0:41:08.044
<v Speaker 2>alchemy of reviews and follows, so it's like the worst

0:41:08.084 --> 0:41:11.485
<v Speaker 2>game of roadblocks ever. So please write us a review.

0:41:11.645 --> 0:41:14.205
<v Speaker 2>But here's the challenge. Here's what I would love.

0:41:14.725 --> 0:41:17.204
<v Speaker 3>I would love if you could please write it in

0:41:17.484 --> 0:41:21.805
<v Speaker 3>gentle parenting speak, so very non praise speak. That would

0:41:21.844 --> 0:41:22.724
<v Speaker 3>really make me laugh.

0:41:22.765 --> 0:41:25.285
<v Speaker 2>So none of this this is the best podcast in

0:41:25.325 --> 0:41:27.685
<v Speaker 2>the whole word world. Like that sort of reckless praise

0:41:27.805 --> 0:41:29.884
<v Speaker 2>will go straight to our heads. It's not good for us.

0:41:30.325 --> 0:41:32.405
<v Speaker 2>So I really want to see what people have got.

0:41:32.765 --> 0:41:36.484
<v Speaker 2>So here's an example. You worked really hard on this

0:41:36.564 --> 0:41:39.205
<v Speaker 2>episode and it shows keep going.

0:41:39.524 --> 0:41:44.644
<v Speaker 3>You're learning and growing every week. I'd like the way

0:41:44.685 --> 0:41:47.765
<v Speaker 3>you're speaking here. I bet one day you're gonna get it.

0:41:50.044 --> 0:41:52.124
<v Speaker 2>Please leave us one a little inside joke for all

0:41:52.165 --> 0:41:54.364
<v Speaker 2>of us, and I can't wait to read them. Big

0:41:54.524 --> 0:41:57.444
<v Speaker 2>Thanks to our team this week. Junior Content Producer is

0:41:57.484 --> 0:42:01.084
<v Speaker 2>Tessa Kotovich, produces Leaporgus and Sashatanic and the group ep

0:42:01.325 --> 0:42:02.205
<v Speaker 2>Is Roots de Vine.

0:42:02.364 --> 0:42:04.565
<v Speaker 3>Have a great week. Will be back in this feed

0:42:04.805 --> 0:42:10.604
<v Speaker 3>next Saturday morning. See ya, Bye, Yes