WEBVTT - Um, Who Are You Calling A Narcissist?

0:00:10.622 --> 0:00:13.382
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to a MoMA Mia podcast.

0:00:13.822 --> 0:00:17.182
<v Speaker 2>Mamma Mia acknowledges the traditional owners of land and warders

0:00:17.222 --> 0:00:18.822
<v Speaker 2>that this podcast is recorded on.

0:00:20.582 --> 0:00:25.422
<v Speaker 3>I only get profoundly irritained or invested enough to care

0:00:25.662 --> 0:00:28.142
<v Speaker 3>about people who are close to me. If I don't

0:00:28.142 --> 0:00:30.141
<v Speaker 3>care at all, it's a sign that you're not important

0:00:30.222 --> 0:00:31.621
<v Speaker 3>in my life. You know what I mean?

0:00:31.822 --> 0:00:31.982
<v Speaker 4>Oh?

0:00:31.982 --> 0:00:33.982
<v Speaker 1>No, I have strong feelings about lots of people who

0:00:33.942 --> 0:00:37.342
<v Speaker 1>aren't important in who I've never met before.

0:00:40.462 --> 0:00:43.422
<v Speaker 3>Hello, and welcome to Mamma Mia. Out loud what women

0:00:43.462 --> 0:00:46.422
<v Speaker 3>are actually talking about on Wednesday, the fourteenth of May.

0:00:46.502 --> 0:00:48.062
<v Speaker 3>I'm Holly Wainwright, I'm.

0:00:47.862 --> 0:00:50.502
<v Speaker 5>Mea Friedman, and I'm Jesse Stevens.

0:00:50.102 --> 0:00:53.542
<v Speaker 3>And welcome to our chaotic on the Road recording. Hopefully

0:00:53.582 --> 0:00:56.302
<v Speaker 3>you've been enjoying it this week and it continues because

0:00:56.302 --> 0:00:58.382
<v Speaker 3>today we are in Brisbane and we will see you

0:00:58.462 --> 0:01:01.542
<v Speaker 3>tonight out Louders on the show. There's a word being

0:01:01.582 --> 0:01:03.902
<v Speaker 3>thrown around a lot on the internet this week, and

0:01:03.942 --> 0:01:07.862
<v Speaker 3>it's narcissist. Why is everyone suddenly one? And if you

0:01:07.982 --> 0:01:10.342
<v Speaker 3>have to google whether or not you are one? Is

0:01:10.382 --> 0:01:14.302
<v Speaker 3>the answer clear? Also, the p Diddy trial started this

0:01:14.422 --> 0:01:18.021
<v Speaker 3>week and the headlines are already grimmed. What's it all about?

0:01:18.182 --> 0:01:21.782
<v Speaker 3>On which celebrities are feeling very nervous right now? And

0:01:22.502 --> 0:01:25.262
<v Speaker 3>is it normal to hate your partner? There's a very

0:01:25.302 --> 0:01:29.262
<v Speaker 3>respectable couples therapist who says yes, and that actually it's

0:01:29.302 --> 0:01:31.902
<v Speaker 3>a very good sign. But first, Mia Friedman.

0:01:32.302 --> 0:01:35.062
<v Speaker 1>In case you missed it, Susan Lee has been elected

0:01:35.102 --> 0:01:38.382
<v Speaker 1>the first woman to ever lead the Liberal Party. She

0:01:38.502 --> 0:01:42.422
<v Speaker 1>defeated challenger Angus Taylor twenty nine to twenty five in

0:01:42.462 --> 0:01:45.782
<v Speaker 1>the battle to replace Peter Dutton as opposition leader after

0:01:45.822 --> 0:01:49.742
<v Speaker 1>the party's devastating election loss. Sounds a little bit like

0:01:49.782 --> 0:01:52.982
<v Speaker 1>a shit skirt hole, just like Thereasa May war in

0:01:53.022 --> 0:01:56.342
<v Speaker 1>the UK. Can you revisit what that means?

0:01:56.942 --> 0:02:01.982
<v Speaker 3>Yes. Back in twenty sixteen, after the massive Brexit loss

0:02:02.102 --> 0:02:05.502
<v Speaker 3>in the UK, nobody wanted to be the leader of

0:02:05.582 --> 0:02:08.302
<v Speaker 3>the Conservative Party because they're in complete disarray. The people

0:02:08.341 --> 0:02:11.102
<v Speaker 3>who'd campaigned four breaks it didn't want to be responsible

0:02:11.142 --> 0:02:13.181
<v Speaker 3>for the mess of getting it done. The people who

0:02:13.262 --> 0:02:15.902
<v Speaker 3>campaigned against it, which was the sitting Prime Minister at

0:02:15.942 --> 0:02:19.181
<v Speaker 3>the time, David Cameron, obviously were humiliated. So no one

0:02:19.222 --> 0:02:22.222
<v Speaker 3>wanted that job until Theresa May put her hand up

0:02:22.342 --> 0:02:24.742
<v Speaker 3>and we discussed at the time how it was kind

0:02:24.782 --> 0:02:27.341
<v Speaker 3>of like she'd got a lot of shit on her

0:02:27.342 --> 0:02:30.702
<v Speaker 3>skirt and she was going to have to be spending

0:02:30.742 --> 0:02:33.422
<v Speaker 3>a whole lot of time trying to clean it off

0:02:33.742 --> 0:02:36.222
<v Speaker 3>as more and more people piled more shit onto her.

0:02:36.262 --> 0:02:39.262
<v Speaker 3>And that is how we came to the shitskirt analogy.

0:02:39.542 --> 0:02:42.222
<v Speaker 3>This does feel a bit like a shit skirt moment

0:02:42.462 --> 0:02:46.582
<v Speaker 3>because the Liberals have just had a historic defeat. They

0:02:46.582 --> 0:02:49.582
<v Speaker 3>are so reduced in the Parliament, Labor have more than

0:02:49.582 --> 0:02:53.102
<v Speaker 3>twice as many seats, so much to celebrate in the

0:02:53.181 --> 0:02:56.422
<v Speaker 3>female leader, but work cut out Jesse.

0:02:56.902 --> 0:02:59.142
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, a lot of people were talking about the glass cliff.

0:02:59.382 --> 0:03:03.102
<v Speaker 5>People talk about the glass ceiling that women face, which.

0:03:02.942 --> 0:03:05.422
<v Speaker 1>She has broken through. Is the first female leader of

0:03:05.462 --> 0:03:06.181
<v Speaker 1>the Liberal Party?

0:03:06.302 --> 0:03:08.262
<v Speaker 5>Yes, And the glass cliff is the idea, we'll put

0:03:08.262 --> 0:03:10.901
<v Speaker 5>you in a position of power just to what you

0:03:11.181 --> 0:03:14.061
<v Speaker 5>fall off. And I don't think that's the whole story here,

0:03:14.102 --> 0:03:19.022
<v Speaker 5>because she was next in line, really like in terms

0:03:19.062 --> 0:03:22.102
<v Speaker 5>of she was deputy, it's not ridiculous that this would

0:03:22.142 --> 0:03:24.382
<v Speaker 5>be a job that she takes.

0:03:24.662 --> 0:03:27.302
<v Speaker 3>And to be clear, the idea that a woman might

0:03:27.342 --> 0:03:30.262
<v Speaker 3>be handled a shitskirt is not like denigrating the woman.

0:03:30.382 --> 0:03:32.781
<v Speaker 3>It's not like saying that she didn't deserve it. It's

0:03:32.862 --> 0:03:36.822
<v Speaker 3>just that sometimes establishments suddenly seem to decide that a

0:03:36.862 --> 0:03:40.662
<v Speaker 3>female leader or sea would be a great idea just

0:03:40.742 --> 0:03:41.662
<v Speaker 3>when everything.

0:03:41.382 --> 0:03:45.862
<v Speaker 1>Shit because Julie Bishop, remember was the deputy leader and

0:03:46.102 --> 0:03:48.302
<v Speaker 1>didn't get the job when it went to Scott Morrison,

0:03:48.382 --> 0:03:51.582
<v Speaker 1>and many people say that was the beginning of the end,

0:03:51.742 --> 0:03:55.022
<v Speaker 1>certainly for the Liberal Party's reputation with women.

0:03:55.462 --> 0:03:58.462
<v Speaker 5>Yes, so years ago, I think it was like twenty fifteen,

0:03:58.502 --> 0:04:02.142
<v Speaker 5>the Liberal Party established a target for how many women

0:04:02.182 --> 0:04:04.062
<v Speaker 5>they wanted to get too politics because the Labor Party

0:04:04.062 --> 0:04:07.062
<v Speaker 5>did this a long time ago. And now, of course

0:04:07.342 --> 0:04:10.182
<v Speaker 5>we are having a historic moment with more women in

0:04:10.382 --> 0:04:13.662
<v Speaker 5>Parliament and more women in the Cabinet than ever before,

0:04:13.702 --> 0:04:16.702
<v Speaker 5>which is really exciting. But they set this target and

0:04:16.861 --> 0:04:20.102
<v Speaker 5>were very much against quotas and they've not kept themselves

0:04:20.301 --> 0:04:24.061
<v Speaker 5>accountable to those targets at all. And last election in

0:04:24.101 --> 0:04:27.181
<v Speaker 5>twenty twenty two they had their worst result in thirty

0:04:27.262 --> 0:04:30.782
<v Speaker 5>years for female representation. Friend of the Pod Charlotte Morlock

0:04:30.861 --> 0:04:33.821
<v Speaker 5>has written a great deal about this, and she says

0:04:33.861 --> 0:04:38.021
<v Speaker 5>that most Liberal politicians are men. I think over about

0:04:38.061 --> 0:04:41.582
<v Speaker 5>sixty and the voters in Australia, the average voter is

0:04:41.582 --> 0:04:43.501
<v Speaker 5>a thirty seven year old female and they're not seeing

0:04:43.501 --> 0:04:46.701
<v Speaker 5>themselves represented by this party at all. She's actually put

0:04:46.741 --> 0:04:50.821
<v Speaker 5>together a petition and it's putting pressure on the Liberal

0:04:50.861 --> 0:04:55.342
<v Speaker 5>Party to go, let's introduce some gender quotas. Regardless of

0:04:55.342 --> 0:04:57.741
<v Speaker 5>how you vote, if you are not about the Liberal Party,

0:04:57.821 --> 0:04:59.821
<v Speaker 5>if you would never in a million years vote for them.

0:05:00.181 --> 0:05:03.741
<v Speaker 5>For a thriving democracy, what we want is equal representation

0:05:04.101 --> 0:05:06.821
<v Speaker 5>and we want a competitive democracy. And what we've seen

0:05:06.861 --> 0:05:09.822
<v Speaker 5>with the Liberal Party going further and further right them

0:05:09.861 --> 0:05:12.662
<v Speaker 5>to represent their electorates. And there are Liberal women who

0:05:12.702 --> 0:05:14.741
<v Speaker 5>have tried to put their hands up and so it'll

0:05:14.782 --> 0:05:19.141
<v Speaker 5>be interesting to see if they actually introduce a quota.

0:05:19.222 --> 0:05:21.981
<v Speaker 5>Maybe Susan Lee is the first step to having more

0:05:22.022 --> 0:05:23.021
<v Speaker 5>female representation.

0:05:23.981 --> 0:05:26.342
<v Speaker 3>Also, in case you missed it, you need to put

0:05:26.342 --> 0:05:29.342
<v Speaker 3>some tape over your mouth? Yes, you do. Everywhere I

0:05:29.381 --> 0:05:32.421
<v Speaker 3>look at the moment, there is a prominent and influential

0:05:32.462 --> 0:05:36.741
<v Speaker 3>woman mouth taping. Most recently, I saw Sally Obermeina on

0:05:36.782 --> 0:05:39.501
<v Speaker 3>Instagram saying that putting tape over her mouth at night

0:05:39.741 --> 0:05:42.061
<v Speaker 3>had meant that she wakes up more energized every day.

0:05:42.061 --> 0:05:44.502
<v Speaker 3>That she's sleeping better than ever. And then, of course

0:05:44.541 --> 0:05:47.021
<v Speaker 3>there's my mate Gwynneth, who says, the first thing she

0:05:47.101 --> 0:05:49.582
<v Speaker 3>has to do in the morning is basically on block

0:05:49.782 --> 0:05:50.782
<v Speaker 3>all her orifices.

0:05:51.301 --> 0:05:53.701
<v Speaker 1>I wake up, I take off my mouth tape, my

0:05:53.941 --> 0:05:56.181
<v Speaker 1>mouth earpl my mouth taping.

0:05:56.541 --> 0:05:58.941
<v Speaker 3>Oh my god, I gotta call you the what.

0:05:59.741 --> 0:06:02.141
<v Speaker 5>Oh yeah, I think it looks like such bullshit.

0:06:02.381 --> 0:06:03.741
<v Speaker 4>I'll send you a bunch of research.

0:06:03.981 --> 0:06:04.621
<v Speaker 1>It's so good.

0:06:04.902 --> 0:06:07.741
<v Speaker 3>She goes on, say, mouth tape, IM ask air plugs.

0:06:07.782 --> 0:06:09.941
<v Speaker 3>She basically is like when she goes to bed, she

0:06:09.981 --> 0:06:12.821
<v Speaker 3>has to block herself off from the entire world. Guys,

0:06:12.861 --> 0:06:15.181
<v Speaker 3>are we trying it? Are we ready to mouth tape?

0:06:15.582 --> 0:06:18.981
<v Speaker 5>It's an interesting theory. I listened to Norman Swan talk

0:06:19.022 --> 0:06:22.061
<v Speaker 5>about it, and a lot of sentists and health experts

0:06:22.101 --> 0:06:24.662
<v Speaker 5>have poop pooed a bit because they say, if you

0:06:24.702 --> 0:06:27.141
<v Speaker 5>are a mouth breather, if you go to bed and

0:06:27.541 --> 0:06:29.941
<v Speaker 5>you're finding that you breathe through your mouth all night,

0:06:30.501 --> 0:06:32.821
<v Speaker 5>there's probably a reason for that, and that might be

0:06:32.902 --> 0:06:35.261
<v Speaker 5>that your nose is blocked, in which case, if you're

0:06:35.662 --> 0:06:41.222
<v Speaker 5>covering your mouth, then it could affect oxygen supply. If

0:06:41.222 --> 0:06:43.462
<v Speaker 5>you're suddenly putting all this pressure on your nose, so

0:06:43.501 --> 0:06:46.501
<v Speaker 5>it's definitely not advisable for everyone.

0:06:46.621 --> 0:06:49.302
<v Speaker 1>Couldn't do it if you had a cold, No, exactly right,

0:06:49.381 --> 0:06:51.462
<v Speaker 1>well allergy do it if you wanted to kiss someone.

0:06:52.022 --> 0:06:58.061
<v Speaker 5>No, But there is this growing field of like health

0:06:58.101 --> 0:07:03.381
<v Speaker 5>and wellness focused around breathing and how we're all doing

0:07:03.462 --> 0:07:07.861
<v Speaker 5>it wrong. So apparently we're breathing too much a minute.

0:07:08.262 --> 0:07:10.182
<v Speaker 5>Someone told me once that you meant to breathe like

0:07:10.262 --> 0:07:12.742
<v Speaker 5>twelve times a minute. I reckon, I'm breathing like forty

0:07:12.782 --> 0:07:13.542
<v Speaker 5>two times a minute.

0:07:13.582 --> 0:07:15.782
<v Speaker 3>I'm thinking about it now, I'm like thinking, how many

0:07:15.821 --> 0:07:16.662
<v Speaker 3>times am I breathing?

0:07:16.902 --> 0:07:19.502
<v Speaker 5>We've evolved, and it's to do with the fact that

0:07:19.502 --> 0:07:22.662
<v Speaker 5>we eat softer foods and a bunch of other things,

0:07:22.702 --> 0:07:25.381
<v Speaker 5>where our jaws are just wired differently and our airways

0:07:25.422 --> 0:07:28.021
<v Speaker 5>have gotten smaller. This is what everyone says, right, and

0:07:28.182 --> 0:07:33.462
<v Speaker 5>ancient civilizations knew the importance of breathing for stress, for relaxation,

0:07:33.782 --> 0:07:36.982
<v Speaker 5>for all of the things and being alive. Exactly, we've

0:07:37.022 --> 0:07:39.662
<v Speaker 5>lost the art, so we need to be retrained in breathing,

0:07:39.702 --> 0:07:42.302
<v Speaker 5>and I think mouth tape is a part of that.

0:07:42.381 --> 0:07:44.742
<v Speaker 5>Mayor this feels like something you'll be doing literally tonight.

0:07:44.982 --> 0:07:47.102
<v Speaker 1>Well, I'm excited that there's another thing that I can

0:07:47.142 --> 0:07:50.941
<v Speaker 1>do yep, before bed. I mean, crikey, I already wear

0:07:50.941 --> 0:07:54.982
<v Speaker 1>a mouthguard, so you know I've already got stuff going

0:07:55.022 --> 0:07:57.622
<v Speaker 1>on in my mouth. I'm not an ear plug or

0:07:57.622 --> 0:08:01.021
<v Speaker 1>an eye mask person. I don't know whether it's a

0:08:01.062 --> 0:08:04.302
<v Speaker 1>hangover from having little kids, but I always feel like

0:08:04.342 --> 0:08:06.461
<v Speaker 1>I need to be alert to know what's going on

0:08:07.302 --> 0:08:10.302
<v Speaker 1>in the house. Not that that's got anything. Maybe I

0:08:10.342 --> 0:08:11.901
<v Speaker 1>don't want to take my mouth because I might have

0:08:11.902 --> 0:08:13.941
<v Speaker 1>something to say in the middle of the night. Apparently

0:08:14.022 --> 0:08:16.261
<v Speaker 1>last night I got up to go to the toilet,

0:08:16.381 --> 0:08:19.742
<v Speaker 1>and apparently on the way back to bed, I said

0:08:19.742 --> 0:08:22.982
<v Speaker 1>to the dog, I love you, Belle. I was not

0:08:23.102 --> 0:08:24.982
<v Speaker 1>even aware of that I said that out loud, but

0:08:25.302 --> 0:08:28.261
<v Speaker 1>it woke up my husband. So yeah, no, I won't

0:08:28.342 --> 0:08:30.542
<v Speaker 1>be mouth taping. Do you just use like reggular, use

0:08:30.662 --> 0:08:31.502
<v Speaker 1>like a band.

0:08:31.182 --> 0:08:33.902
<v Speaker 3>Aid, or you need special mouth tape? So it's something

0:08:33.942 --> 0:08:36.222
<v Speaker 3>else you to buy me. Oh, which is fine obviously

0:08:36.662 --> 0:08:38.822
<v Speaker 3>given that all the trendy people are into it. I'm

0:08:38.822 --> 0:08:41.462
<v Speaker 3>sure that there are degrees of cool mouth tape and

0:08:41.462 --> 0:08:44.381
<v Speaker 3>on cool, but a lot of people say it really

0:08:44.462 --> 0:08:46.542
<v Speaker 3>helps you sleep, you know, I've got issues with that.

0:08:46.622 --> 0:08:49.102
<v Speaker 3>I reckon I will be mouth taping in a hot minute.

0:08:49.542 --> 0:08:53.262
<v Speaker 1>The internet is accusing everyone of being a narcissist this week,

0:08:53.302 --> 0:08:56.582
<v Speaker 1>and we'd like to know what one actually is. You

0:08:56.622 --> 0:08:59.622
<v Speaker 1>may have seen the headlines about Abby Chatfield upset on

0:08:59.662 --> 0:09:03.622
<v Speaker 1>Instagram about a number of things that Clementine Ford has

0:09:03.662 --> 0:09:08.222
<v Speaker 1>said about her. These are two sort of prominent online personalities.

0:09:08.702 --> 0:09:12.142
<v Speaker 1>Clementine Ford currently said that Abby is a narcissist, and

0:09:12.222 --> 0:09:14.302
<v Speaker 1>Abby said that was very upsetting to her because that's

0:09:14.342 --> 0:09:16.222
<v Speaker 1>what an ex used to call her, and so she

0:09:16.262 --> 0:09:19.102
<v Speaker 1>asked her therapist if she was one, and her therapist

0:09:19.102 --> 0:09:22.982
<v Speaker 1>said no. Anyway, we aren't waiting into that online drama

0:09:23.022 --> 0:09:25.342
<v Speaker 1>because we're not stupid. But one of the top stories

0:09:25.342 --> 0:09:27.862
<v Speaker 1>on Mum and mea this week was about women who

0:09:27.902 --> 0:09:31.622
<v Speaker 1>realized their mothers were narcissists. Happy Mother's Day. That's a

0:09:31.622 --> 0:09:34.142
<v Speaker 1>good thing to put the card. You may have noticed.

0:09:34.142 --> 0:09:35.982
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if you guys have noticed, but people

0:09:36.022 --> 0:09:39.222
<v Speaker 1>seem to be diagnosing other people with narcissism at a

0:09:39.222 --> 0:09:42.422
<v Speaker 1>fairly alarming rate. So the question is, is everyone suddenly

0:09:42.462 --> 0:09:45.662
<v Speaker 1>a narcissist or is the term being overused?

0:09:45.982 --> 0:09:48.902
<v Speaker 5>Jesse Well there's actually a really interesting theory I read

0:09:48.902 --> 0:09:53.022
<v Speaker 5>from a doctor who said that the thing about certified narcissists,

0:09:53.182 --> 0:09:57.462
<v Speaker 5>as in people with narcissistic personality disorder as defined by

0:09:57.462 --> 0:09:59.462
<v Speaker 5>the DSM, and we'll get to the definition of that,

0:09:59.822 --> 0:10:01.622
<v Speaker 5>but the thing about them is that they can be

0:10:01.822 --> 0:10:05.702
<v Speaker 5>very charismatic and very attractive, and therefore might actually pro

0:10:05.782 --> 0:10:08.462
<v Speaker 5>create more, which means that we may be living in

0:10:08.502 --> 0:10:11.342
<v Speaker 5>a world that has more narcissists than ever before. It

0:10:11.422 --> 0:10:15.502
<v Speaker 5>might be a trait that is evolutionarily rewarded and therefore

0:10:15.702 --> 0:10:19.902
<v Speaker 5>is more widespread. I don't think it would happen this quickly,

0:10:19.942 --> 0:10:22.782
<v Speaker 5>but it was an interesting theory. I think the reason

0:10:22.822 --> 0:10:25.662
<v Speaker 5>we're hearing it more and more is because calling someone

0:10:25.782 --> 0:10:30.342
<v Speaker 5>a narcissist is a way of turning their identity into

0:10:30.382 --> 0:10:35.102
<v Speaker 5>this static thing and dismissing them in a way that

0:10:35.182 --> 0:10:38.902
<v Speaker 5>makes them totally irredeemable, because of course we all behave

0:10:39.102 --> 0:10:43.862
<v Speaker 5>in ways that are narcissistic, and psychologists will say, the

0:10:43.902 --> 0:10:46.902
<v Speaker 5>trait of narcissism exists on a spectrum, and we are

0:10:46.982 --> 0:10:50.862
<v Speaker 5>all there. We all have ego that exists within us,

0:10:50.902 --> 0:10:54.781
<v Speaker 5>and you know, all the time we act like narcissists.

0:10:55.342 --> 0:10:57.822
<v Speaker 5>It's less than one percent of the population that is

0:10:58.142 --> 0:11:03.382
<v Speaker 5>thought to be actual narcissists, and of those, seventy five

0:11:03.542 --> 0:11:06.502
<v Speaker 5>percent are thought to be men. So it's something that's

0:11:06.542 --> 0:11:08.582
<v Speaker 5>diagnosed a lot more in men than women, and it

0:11:08.742 --> 0:11:12.862
<v Speaker 5>looks very different in men than women. Holly, do you

0:11:12.902 --> 0:11:13.662
<v Speaker 5>think you know any?

0:11:13.902 --> 0:11:18.502
<v Speaker 3>I do. I also think although it's become very fashionable

0:11:18.542 --> 0:11:21.822
<v Speaker 3>for women in particular, Sale, my ex was definitely a narcissist.

0:11:22.542 --> 0:11:25.782
<v Speaker 3>There's a real community of people who believe that narcissists

0:11:25.982 --> 0:11:29.141
<v Speaker 3>have damaged their relationships, whether it's their romantic ones or

0:11:29.142 --> 0:11:32.622
<v Speaker 3>their familiar ones. As you said me about mothers. I

0:11:32.662 --> 0:11:36.702
<v Speaker 3>interviewed a woman called Margie Bowden who is a narcissism expert.

0:11:36.742 --> 0:11:38.982
<v Speaker 3>She has so many followers. She is so but she's

0:11:38.982 --> 0:11:42.982
<v Speaker 3>an Australian woman and she focuses very much on narcissism

0:11:43.062 --> 0:11:43.982
<v Speaker 3>and relationships.

0:11:44.062 --> 0:11:47.142
<v Speaker 2>And you're in that relationship, you just you know, I

0:11:47.262 --> 0:11:50.462
<v Speaker 2>know that they love me. You know, we live in hope.

0:11:50.502 --> 0:11:54.022
<v Speaker 2>Hope is very powerful and often when you are in that,

0:11:54.862 --> 0:11:58.702
<v Speaker 2>in that early stage, you will have friends, You will

0:11:58.742 --> 0:12:01.302
<v Speaker 2>have people saying what are you doing? Can't you see

0:12:01.502 --> 0:12:06.982
<v Speaker 2>that they're no good? But you're now in an abuse cycle.

0:12:06.862 --> 0:12:12.342
<v Speaker 3>And she says some of the signs are lying, gas lighting, cheating, manipulation, control.

0:12:12.502 --> 0:12:14.742
<v Speaker 3>Now the thing is, it's not everybody who does those

0:12:14.782 --> 0:12:20.182
<v Speaker 3>things is a narcissist, but narcissists will definitely do those things.

0:12:20.262 --> 0:12:22.262
<v Speaker 3>And one of the things, to your point, Jesse, about

0:12:22.382 --> 0:12:24.342
<v Speaker 3>once you've called somebody that, and the reason there's so

0:12:24.422 --> 0:12:28.902
<v Speaker 3>much weight to it is it's incurable. Like a narcissist

0:12:29.022 --> 0:12:32.062
<v Speaker 3>is a narcissist. We all have our narcissistic traits, as

0:12:32.102 --> 0:12:35.062
<v Speaker 3>you've said, Jesse, and you can work towards working with

0:12:35.102 --> 0:12:37.422
<v Speaker 3>them or suppressing them or anything like that, but a

0:12:37.462 --> 0:12:40.382
<v Speaker 3>true narcissist is always going to be a narcissist. So

0:12:40.422 --> 0:12:42.862
<v Speaker 3>a lot of Margie's work is about how do you

0:12:42.942 --> 0:12:45.422
<v Speaker 3>copaent with a narcissist, How do you go to Mother's

0:12:45.462 --> 0:12:47.582
<v Speaker 3>Day when your mum's a narcist? How do you deal

0:12:47.662 --> 0:12:48.062
<v Speaker 3>with it?

0:12:48.382 --> 0:12:51.062
<v Speaker 1>I know it seems like splitting hairs, but there's a

0:12:51.102 --> 0:12:56.062
<v Speaker 1>difference between being narcissistic and having those traits and being

0:12:56.222 --> 0:13:00.142
<v Speaker 1>a narcissist. One is sort of an adjective and one

0:13:00.222 --> 0:13:03.262
<v Speaker 1>is a noun. The big thing that's happened online is

0:13:03.302 --> 0:13:07.781
<v Speaker 1>that there's confusion between the traits of narcissism and the disorder.

0:13:07.942 --> 0:13:11.982
<v Speaker 1>So people have started and labeling like selfish or arrogant

0:13:12.062 --> 0:13:17.342
<v Speaker 1>or even annoying behavior as narcissism. But actual narcissistic personality

0:13:17.382 --> 0:13:21.182
<v Speaker 1>disorder involves a persistent pattern of lack of empathy and

0:13:21.262 --> 0:13:25.902
<v Speaker 1>grandiosity and exploitative behavior. And it has to be not

0:13:25.982 --> 0:13:29.222
<v Speaker 1>just persistent but life disrupting.

0:13:29.582 --> 0:13:32.502
<v Speaker 3>Yes, And they say that the thing about narcissists, and

0:13:32.262 --> 0:13:34.662
<v Speaker 3>we know this because of the way that we colloquially

0:13:34.782 --> 0:13:37.142
<v Speaker 3>use it, but it is all about them, right, that

0:13:37.262 --> 0:13:40.102
<v Speaker 3>everybody and everything around them exists only to serve their needs.

0:13:40.102 --> 0:13:42.222
<v Speaker 3>And I remember when I was talking to Margie the expert,

0:13:42.222 --> 0:13:44.542
<v Speaker 3>I said, that sounds like a psychopath, and she said,

0:13:44.542 --> 0:13:48.342
<v Speaker 3>there's a crucial difference. And psychopaths don't care what other

0:13:48.382 --> 0:13:51.062
<v Speaker 3>people think of them. Narcissists really do.

0:13:51.502 --> 0:13:54.742
<v Speaker 1>Yes, that's the difference exactly. And that's the difference a

0:13:54.782 --> 0:13:58.262
<v Speaker 1>couple of I mean, you can't diagnose people with mental

0:13:58.262 --> 0:14:03.062
<v Speaker 1>disorders from the outside. But two prominent examples that display

0:14:03.622 --> 0:14:09.662
<v Speaker 1>not just narcissistic traits but narcissistic personality disorder symptoms are

0:14:09.702 --> 0:14:11.982
<v Speaker 1>Kanye West and Donald Trump.

0:14:12.262 --> 0:14:15.822
<v Speaker 5>I think TikTok co opting a lot of this language.

0:14:16.382 --> 0:14:19.382
<v Speaker 5>Narcissism or you are a narcissist, has just become interchangeable

0:14:19.422 --> 0:14:23.182
<v Speaker 5>with you are an asshole, and they are different things.

0:14:24.062 --> 0:14:29.542
<v Speaker 5>But I wonder too if we're seeing more narcissistic behavior

0:14:29.582 --> 0:14:33.102
<v Speaker 5>because we live in a culture that so clearly rewards it.

0:14:33.462 --> 0:14:38.782
<v Speaker 5>So vanity, self centeredness, heightened sense of self worth, visions

0:14:38.782 --> 0:14:43.902
<v Speaker 5>of their own grandiosity, probably incredibly ambitious, undeterred by rejection,

0:14:44.422 --> 0:14:48.662
<v Speaker 5>craving attention, highly motivated. All of those things will make

0:14:48.702 --> 0:14:51.262
<v Speaker 5>you a winner in the world we live in, and

0:14:51.302 --> 0:14:56.222
<v Speaker 5>in fact, social morality can be a hurdle or a

0:14:56.302 --> 0:14:59.822
<v Speaker 5>hindrance to what we see as capitalist's success. So if

0:14:59.902 --> 0:15:03.062
<v Speaker 5>you don't worry about any of those things, then you

0:15:03.142 --> 0:15:06.742
<v Speaker 5>might rise and rise. But the irony to calling someone

0:15:06.782 --> 0:15:10.542
<v Speaker 5>a narcissist online, it's like when someone reads a memoir

0:15:10.622 --> 0:15:14.182
<v Speaker 5>and goes all they did is talk about themselves. It's like, yeah,

0:15:14.222 --> 0:15:17.462
<v Speaker 5>the medium is a message, like we're all narcissists on

0:15:17.462 --> 0:15:20.222
<v Speaker 5>our social media platforms because that's what the technology is

0:15:20.902 --> 0:15:23.742
<v Speaker 5>demanding of us. And I know it. It's like such

0:15:23.782 --> 0:15:28.502
<v Speaker 5>a basic primary school lesson, but you know, not weighing

0:15:28.542 --> 0:15:33.462
<v Speaker 5>into any internet drama. But the second someone calls anyone

0:15:33.902 --> 0:15:39.022
<v Speaker 5>a definitive name and stops playing the ball, but instead

0:15:39.062 --> 0:15:42.262
<v Speaker 5>starts playing the person, you've lost me. And I just

0:15:42.302 --> 0:15:44.822
<v Speaker 5>see so much of this all over my social media

0:15:44.862 --> 0:15:46.902
<v Speaker 5>where you just throw out these terms. It must feel

0:15:46.902 --> 0:15:47.822
<v Speaker 5>good to use.

0:15:47.742 --> 0:15:49.942
<v Speaker 1>Because it's so reductive, isn't it and dismissive.

0:15:50.222 --> 0:15:52.382
<v Speaker 5>Well, it always just undermines your argument as well.

0:15:52.542 --> 0:15:56.502
<v Speaker 1>It's interesting how things have changed so much for gen

0:15:56.742 --> 0:15:59.582
<v Speaker 1>X's I remember that the worst thing you could be

0:15:59.702 --> 0:16:03.702
<v Speaker 1>at school and in Australia really is up yourself or vain.

0:16:03.982 --> 0:16:07.902
<v Speaker 1>That was the biggest diss But you're right, Jesse, like

0:16:07.982 --> 0:16:12.022
<v Speaker 1>in just a generation, we are now living in the

0:16:12.022 --> 0:16:16.782
<v Speaker 1>world of the front facing camera where we're encouraged to

0:16:16.942 --> 0:16:22.422
<v Speaker 1>just share our every thought, feeling, outfit, opinion with the world.

0:16:22.542 --> 0:16:25.742
<v Speaker 1>And there's a whole category of people that do that

0:16:25.742 --> 0:16:27.542
<v Speaker 1>that are very able to make a lot of money

0:16:27.582 --> 0:16:29.542
<v Speaker 1>for it, and they're called influencers. And you know, I

0:16:29.542 --> 0:16:32.102
<v Speaker 1>listened to us. Who cares what we think? Yep, here

0:16:32.142 --> 0:16:34.582
<v Speaker 1>we are here talking about narcissism. Who cares what the

0:16:34.622 --> 0:16:37.582
<v Speaker 1>three of us think? And we've been rewarded really well

0:16:37.582 --> 0:16:39.702
<v Speaker 1>for it. So I did google whether I was a

0:16:39.782 --> 0:16:40.542
<v Speaker 1>narcissist once?

0:16:40.782 --> 0:16:41.942
<v Speaker 5>What made you google it?

0:16:42.142 --> 0:16:44.662
<v Speaker 1>Because someone called me one? Someone who knew me called

0:16:44.662 --> 0:16:46.782
<v Speaker 1>me one, and then afterwards they apologized and said I

0:16:46.822 --> 0:16:49.422
<v Speaker 1>was just being a dick and that's not fair. But

0:16:49.542 --> 0:16:52.342
<v Speaker 1>what I discovered, much to my relief, is that if

0:16:52.382 --> 0:16:55.862
<v Speaker 1>you google am I a narcissist, you're not a narcissist

0:16:55.902 --> 0:17:00.102
<v Speaker 1>because narcissists aren't worried about being narcissists because they don't care.

0:17:00.422 --> 0:17:03.302
<v Speaker 5>I reckon. I know one that comes to mind, and

0:17:03.342 --> 0:17:10.502
<v Speaker 5>the sign for me is incredibly professionally successful, took risks,

0:17:11.022 --> 0:17:13.981
<v Speaker 5>made decisions that would be very difficult to make if

0:17:14.061 --> 0:17:18.061
<v Speaker 5>you had real social relationships with people, and left in

0:17:18.101 --> 0:17:21.782
<v Speaker 5>the wake of that are disastrous personal relationships?

0:17:22.101 --> 0:17:22.461
<v Speaker 4>Is it me?

0:17:23.462 --> 0:17:26.342
<v Speaker 5>No, you have quite good relationships with the people around Jamana.

0:17:26.942 --> 0:17:27.142
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

0:17:27.182 --> 0:17:30.622
<v Speaker 1>I think I've definitely got narcissistic tendencies. I think in

0:17:30.702 --> 0:17:34.022
<v Speaker 1>some ways, certainly, to get ahead in our industry, you

0:17:34.101 --> 0:17:37.542
<v Speaker 1>have to be self focused a lot, probably more than

0:17:37.621 --> 0:17:40.381
<v Speaker 1>is healthy. Jesus, I started a media company with my

0:17:40.422 --> 0:17:41.821
<v Speaker 1>own name in it.

0:17:41.821 --> 0:17:46.222
<v Speaker 3>It's the behavior you try and train your kids.

0:17:45.901 --> 0:17:48.181
<v Speaker 1>Out of, particularly if you're English or Australian.

0:17:48.502 --> 0:17:48.702
<v Speaker 7>Yeah.

0:17:48.742 --> 0:17:52.381
<v Speaker 3>But also adolescents are by their very nature very narcissistic

0:17:52.462 --> 0:17:56.902
<v Speaker 3>as a total right, like everything is literally around them

0:17:56.901 --> 0:17:58.821
<v Speaker 3>and the way they see the world, and so much

0:17:58.861 --> 0:18:02.022
<v Speaker 3>of parenting is constantly saying, think about what other people

0:18:02.141 --> 0:18:04.341
<v Speaker 3>might think, see yourself through their eyes? How do you

0:18:04.341 --> 0:18:06.421
<v Speaker 3>think that made them feel? How do you think? And

0:18:06.462 --> 0:18:09.382
<v Speaker 3>it's like one of the things about the age will

0:18:09.422 --> 0:18:12.222
<v Speaker 3>have in now, as you say, Jesse, which rewards narcisism

0:18:12.262 --> 0:18:16.022
<v Speaker 3>a lot, is it extends the adolescent view of the world.

0:18:16.101 --> 0:18:18.461
<v Speaker 3>It's like it is really just about you and what

0:18:18.502 --> 0:18:20.581
<v Speaker 3>other people think about you. Because to the point about

0:18:20.702 --> 0:18:23.701
<v Speaker 3>narcissists care about what other people think. It matters a

0:18:23.702 --> 0:18:26.261
<v Speaker 3>great deal that they have high status and that people

0:18:26.341 --> 0:18:27.822
<v Speaker 3>think they're amazing.

0:18:28.182 --> 0:18:31.821
<v Speaker 5>In a moment, celebrity names and horrific testimonies, the court

0:18:31.901 --> 0:18:35.141
<v Speaker 5>case that could land Sean Combs or p Diddy in

0:18:35.182 --> 0:18:36.302
<v Speaker 5>prison full life.

0:18:40.462 --> 0:18:42.381
<v Speaker 1>In case you missed it, men have a new Roman

0:18:42.381 --> 0:18:46.141
<v Speaker 1>Empire and it's man versus gorilla, or should I say

0:18:46.302 --> 0:18:51.542
<v Speaker 1>man versus one hundred gorillas? This bizarre question whether one

0:18:51.621 --> 0:18:55.221
<v Speaker 1>hundred men could defeat a single adult male gorilla in

0:18:55.341 --> 0:18:59.581
<v Speaker 1>hand to hand combat went very viral after mister bast

0:18:59.581 --> 0:19:02.302
<v Speaker 1>tweeted about it, and suddenly everyone from your teenage nephew

0:19:02.341 --> 0:19:07.101
<v Speaker 1>to your accountant has a passionate opinion about primate combat.

0:19:07.742 --> 0:19:10.302
<v Speaker 1>Here is a little explanation of the question.

0:19:10.542 --> 0:19:14.022
<v Speaker 7>It's a hypothetical question that sparked a huge debate on

0:19:14.061 --> 0:19:17.702
<v Speaker 7>social media. Okay, so could one hundred man defeat one

0:19:17.782 --> 0:19:18.942
<v Speaker 7>gorilla nfight?

0:19:19.381 --> 0:19:19.701
<v Speaker 6>Okay?

0:19:19.861 --> 0:19:23.381
<v Speaker 7>So the question was first, this is locker room conversation, Adriana.

0:19:23.502 --> 0:19:25.581
<v Speaker 7>So it was thrown out there on x and has

0:19:25.942 --> 0:19:29.221
<v Speaker 7>been showing up on Facebook, TikTok and read it. People

0:19:29.262 --> 0:19:32.181
<v Speaker 7>seem to have some real opinions on the matter.

0:19:33.302 --> 0:19:35.821
<v Speaker 8>Now let's talk strategy. I think this is very doable.

0:19:35.982 --> 0:19:38.821
<v Speaker 8>If you guys are rush in on him at once,

0:19:38.942 --> 0:19:41.942
<v Speaker 8>there's going to be at least ten of y'all that die, okay,

0:19:42.222 --> 0:19:43.861
<v Speaker 8>And as long as you guys are okay with that,

0:19:43.942 --> 0:19:45.222
<v Speaker 8>then I think you can take him down.

0:19:45.462 --> 0:19:48.341
<v Speaker 7>What the gorilla would do to the first human man

0:19:48.502 --> 0:19:50.342
<v Speaker 7>would be talked about for generations.

0:19:50.381 --> 0:19:53.262
<v Speaker 6>Okay, it would be not ideal to watch.

0:19:53.341 --> 0:19:55.181
<v Speaker 7>I'm going to be the first person to walk up

0:19:55.222 --> 0:19:57.262
<v Speaker 7>to the gorilla, and as I get to it, I'm

0:19:57.262 --> 0:19:59.862
<v Speaker 7>going to slowly turn around and switch teams.

0:20:00.222 --> 0:20:03.941
<v Speaker 1>Wow, well this debate has taken over dinner tables and

0:20:04.022 --> 0:20:09.262
<v Speaker 1>pub conversations and slack channels at work. And here's where

0:20:09.262 --> 0:20:12.781
<v Speaker 1>it interesting. Gorillas are absolute units of raw power. They

0:20:12.782 --> 0:20:15.901
<v Speaker 1>are three times stronger than humans. They can bench press

0:20:15.942 --> 0:20:18.262
<v Speaker 1>around five hundred kilos, and they have jaws that could

0:20:18.341 --> 0:20:21.861
<v Speaker 1>crush your skull like it's a grape. But humans have

0:20:21.982 --> 0:20:27.341
<v Speaker 1>numbers and strategy and the endurance advantage. Gorillas, particularly silver

0:20:27.381 --> 0:20:30.061
<v Speaker 1>back gorillas, they don't have a lot of endurance, so

0:20:30.422 --> 0:20:33.622
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of brute force versus teamwork and planning.

0:20:33.742 --> 0:20:36.422
<v Speaker 5>Jesse, I have a question, how do we know how

0:20:36.502 --> 0:20:40.181
<v Speaker 5>much a gorilla can bench press? Is a gorilla sitting

0:20:40.182 --> 0:20:41.981
<v Speaker 5>there in the zoo doing bench presses and we're just

0:20:42.022 --> 0:20:44.302
<v Speaker 5>adding going to another one.

0:20:44.341 --> 0:20:48.262
<v Speaker 3>This whole thing makes me think evolution never happened. We're

0:20:48.341 --> 0:20:51.181
<v Speaker 3>just still back there. We're just still back there fighting

0:20:51.222 --> 0:20:51.581
<v Speaker 3>the apes.

0:20:51.742 --> 0:20:54.182
<v Speaker 5>I have a mental block in my brain that does

0:20:54.302 --> 0:20:57.861
<v Speaker 5>not allow me to engage with this hypothetical. My husband

0:20:57.901 --> 0:20:59.742
<v Speaker 5>is talking about it, people in my life talking about it,

0:21:00.061 --> 0:21:03.942
<v Speaker 5>and I'm just like, but it wouldn't happen, And if

0:21:03.982 --> 0:21:06.101
<v Speaker 5>it did happen, I don't.

0:21:05.861 --> 0:21:07.821
<v Speaker 1>Know do you know what's interesting about this is that

0:21:07.901 --> 0:21:10.542
<v Speaker 1>usually it's the women that are in my experience, it's

0:21:10.581 --> 0:21:13.861
<v Speaker 1>women who talk about hypotheticals, and men aren't very interested

0:21:13.901 --> 0:21:17.782
<v Speaker 1>in hypotheticals. Very big generalizations I'm making here, but this

0:21:17.942 --> 0:21:19.742
<v Speaker 1>is one of those things that women are just like

0:21:20.341 --> 0:21:23.061
<v Speaker 1>most women. But who cares? And why are we even

0:21:23.101 --> 0:21:23.942
<v Speaker 1>talking about this?

0:21:24.061 --> 0:21:27.422
<v Speaker 5>It's like men are pretending like they know anything about gorillas.

0:21:27.502 --> 0:21:29.101
<v Speaker 5>Like my husband's talking about it. I'm like, what if

0:21:29.141 --> 0:21:31.502
<v Speaker 5>you met at gorilla? What did you learn your gorilla

0:21:31.542 --> 0:21:34.302
<v Speaker 5>facts from Google? With your soft little hands? Like I'm

0:21:34.302 --> 0:21:36.782
<v Speaker 5>not trying to emasculate him, but it's like they're pretending

0:21:36.821 --> 0:21:37.702
<v Speaker 5>to be cave men.

0:21:37.861 --> 0:21:38.861
<v Speaker 1>Do you want to know the answer?

0:21:39.101 --> 0:21:42.262
<v Speaker 3>The answer is clearly that one hundred men could beat

0:21:42.302 --> 0:21:44.302
<v Speaker 3>a gorilla in a fight. Of course they could.

0:21:44.462 --> 0:21:48.141
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, you're right, because the experts generally agree that

0:21:48.182 --> 0:21:51.742
<v Speaker 1>while the gorilla would absolutely demolish the first wave of humans,

0:21:52.422 --> 0:21:57.222
<v Speaker 1>eventually one hundred men who sort of coordinate it. I

0:21:57.262 --> 0:21:59.422
<v Speaker 1>don't know whether they'd need a meeting beforehand. I don't

0:21:59.462 --> 0:22:03.021
<v Speaker 1>think there's prep time involved in this hypothetical. It'd get

0:22:03.101 --> 0:22:05.421
<v Speaker 1>worn down eventually, But let's be honest, most of the

0:22:05.502 --> 0:22:08.462
<v Speaker 1>men would be severely injured or killed before victory.

0:22:08.702 --> 0:22:11.382
<v Speaker 5>Look Robert Erwin weigh in and he just said, just.

0:22:11.422 --> 0:22:16.542
<v Speaker 4>As an animal conservationist, fighting an endangered species just doesn't

0:22:16.821 --> 0:22:20.542
<v Speaker 4>sit right with me. How many people does it take

0:22:20.581 --> 0:22:23.501
<v Speaker 4>to save gorillas? That's the question we should be asking.

0:22:23.621 --> 0:22:29.581
<v Speaker 5>Gorillas are friend not for unendangered changing gears. This week,

0:22:29.782 --> 0:22:33.381
<v Speaker 5>the trial of p Diddy or Sean John Colmes began

0:22:33.621 --> 0:22:37.101
<v Speaker 5>in New York. The fifty five year old wrapper, record

0:22:37.101 --> 0:22:41.381
<v Speaker 5>producer and record executive is charged with transportation to engage

0:22:41.381 --> 0:22:46.741
<v Speaker 5>in prostitution, sex trafficking, and racketeering, which refers to dishonest

0:22:46.782 --> 0:22:51.141
<v Speaker 5>and fraudulent business dealings. So what is this trial going

0:22:51.182 --> 0:22:53.902
<v Speaker 5>to look like, who will be involved and what are

0:22:53.901 --> 0:22:57.981
<v Speaker 5>we likely to learn. Experts have warned that any celebrity

0:22:58.141 --> 0:23:02.141
<v Speaker 5>involved in Combs's supposed free coughs, and they're the free

0:23:02.141 --> 0:23:05.262
<v Speaker 5>cough parties that you may have heard about, should be concerned,

0:23:05.341 --> 0:23:07.941
<v Speaker 5>and many have speculated that we will likely hear the

0:23:08.061 --> 0:23:12.542
<v Speaker 5>names of other people who have participated. Jurors were on

0:23:12.621 --> 0:23:16.341
<v Speaker 5>Monday presented with a questionnaire to assess their suitability to

0:23:16.462 --> 0:23:18.861
<v Speaker 5>the case, so the court might be checking for any

0:23:18.861 --> 0:23:22.941
<v Speaker 5>associations or prejudicial feelings towards celebrities that may be called

0:23:23.022 --> 0:23:26.502
<v Speaker 5>as witnesses during the trial. Names that were on that

0:23:26.621 --> 0:23:31.222
<v Speaker 5>questionnaire included Michael B. Jordan, actor and comedian Mike Myers,

0:23:31.341 --> 0:23:35.741
<v Speaker 5>as well as rappers Kid Cuddy and Kanye West. On

0:23:35.782 --> 0:23:37.782
<v Speaker 5>the first day of the trial, the New York court

0:23:37.982 --> 0:23:42.861
<v Speaker 5>heard claims that Coombs made a male escort urinate in

0:23:42.942 --> 0:23:47.141
<v Speaker 5>his then girlfriend, Cassie Venturer's mouth and threatened to release

0:23:47.222 --> 0:23:51.061
<v Speaker 5>images of her having sex with male escorts. Lawyer Emily

0:23:51.141 --> 0:23:54.181
<v Speaker 5>Johnson has said this is just the tip of the iceberg.

0:23:55.182 --> 0:23:58.701
<v Speaker 5>If found guilty of these crimes, Coombs is looking at

0:23:58.702 --> 0:24:02.542
<v Speaker 5>a potential life sentence. Holly, what do you think we

0:24:02.581 --> 0:24:04.262
<v Speaker 5>are going to see over the coming weeks.

0:24:04.542 --> 0:24:06.981
<v Speaker 3>I think we're going to see, and we're already seeing

0:24:06.982 --> 0:24:12.582
<v Speaker 3>it a lot of almost tittule sensationalist headlines about kinky

0:24:12.782 --> 0:24:18.222
<v Speaker 3>sex parties and extreme behaviors that lots of people participated

0:24:18.262 --> 0:24:21.702
<v Speaker 3>in at a group level at these because Co's defense

0:24:21.821 --> 0:24:25.861
<v Speaker 3>is basically like in a nutshell, is yeah, we lived

0:24:25.861 --> 0:24:29.422
<v Speaker 3>a wild life and people loved these parties, and everyone

0:24:29.502 --> 0:24:33.061
<v Speaker 3>involved was consenting and paid, and this is just how

0:24:33.141 --> 0:24:36.581
<v Speaker 3>we do right, like, that's basically his defense for this

0:24:36.702 --> 0:24:40.621
<v Speaker 3>sort of very particular subset of rich and powerful people

0:24:40.661 --> 0:24:44.581
<v Speaker 3>having a great time. And his defense argue that the

0:24:44.702 --> 0:24:46.941
<v Speaker 3>women who were bringing and there are some men of

0:24:46.982 --> 0:24:50.101
<v Speaker 3>course too, but the women who are bringing cases against

0:24:50.182 --> 0:24:53.902
<v Speaker 3>him and saying they were coerced, he's saying, actually, these

0:24:53.901 --> 0:24:55.702
<v Speaker 3>are just people who had a bit of a different

0:24:55.782 --> 0:24:58.462
<v Speaker 3>sex life. She's saying, his defense attorney is a woman

0:24:58.782 --> 0:25:02.141
<v Speaker 3>and calling these women capable, strong women who had the

0:25:02.182 --> 0:25:05.782
<v Speaker 3>freedom to make the choices that they made. The problem is,

0:25:05.821 --> 0:25:08.022
<v Speaker 3>of course, and this is what the prosecution are going

0:25:08.061 --> 0:25:10.421
<v Speaker 3>to lean hard into. Is at the center of this

0:25:10.581 --> 0:25:15.502
<v Speaker 3>case is this video of did he assaulting his former

0:25:15.702 --> 0:25:19.782
<v Speaker 3>partner who appears in lots of these stories, Cassie Ventura,

0:25:20.422 --> 0:25:22.462
<v Speaker 3>And well, you know, I'm sure that many people listening

0:25:22.502 --> 0:25:24.941
<v Speaker 3>to this have seen either that video or glimpses of

0:25:24.942 --> 0:25:28.181
<v Speaker 3>that video or heard about It's incredibly disturbing, and she

0:25:28.341 --> 0:25:30.302
<v Speaker 3>was with him for years and features a lot of

0:25:30.302 --> 0:25:32.381
<v Speaker 3>these stories. The idea that she was free to leave

0:25:32.422 --> 0:25:35.501
<v Speaker 3>at any time is rather negated by the fact that

0:25:35.542 --> 0:25:38.101
<v Speaker 3>there are witnesses saying that they saw her trying to

0:25:38.182 --> 0:25:41.341
<v Speaker 3>leave and she was violently made to stay. I guess

0:25:41.502 --> 0:25:44.222
<v Speaker 3>everything about this story is grim, and because a lot

0:25:44.222 --> 0:25:48.622
<v Speaker 3>of the names in it are high profile and exciting,

0:25:48.861 --> 0:25:51.261
<v Speaker 3>we're going to see wall to wall coverage, and some

0:25:51.302 --> 0:25:53.182
<v Speaker 3>of it's going to feel a bit like an ordinary

0:25:53.262 --> 0:25:56.502
<v Speaker 3>celebrity trial. And I just feel like we need to

0:25:56.581 --> 0:25:59.181
<v Speaker 3>hold at the center of it that a lot of

0:25:59.222 --> 0:26:02.782
<v Speaker 3>the things that are being talked about being done to

0:26:03.262 --> 0:26:07.182
<v Speaker 3>women at this are not ordinary, and they have said

0:26:07.222 --> 0:26:10.861
<v Speaker 3>over and over again that it wasn't. So it's going

0:26:10.942 --> 0:26:13.102
<v Speaker 3>to be really interesting to see how it plays out.

0:26:13.422 --> 0:26:16.422
<v Speaker 5>The defense said in its opening statement that the government

0:26:16.462 --> 0:26:20.821
<v Speaker 5>has no place in this man's private bedrooms, which again

0:26:21.101 --> 0:26:24.302
<v Speaker 5>is to your point, Holly, that they are suggesting that

0:26:24.302 --> 0:26:26.941
<v Speaker 5>these are private sexual acts that were consented to, and

0:26:26.982 --> 0:26:30.381
<v Speaker 5>we don't know what the court will find. But also,

0:26:31.022 --> 0:26:35.381
<v Speaker 5>Cassie Ventura, she can be interested in whatever sex she

0:26:35.542 --> 0:26:37.782
<v Speaker 5>is or isn't interested in, and that doesn't preclude her

0:26:37.861 --> 0:26:41.061
<v Speaker 5>from being a victim. And it seems sometimes in a

0:26:41.262 --> 0:26:44.502
<v Speaker 5>court that there's sort of an assumption that it does,

0:26:44.821 --> 0:26:46.701
<v Speaker 5>and in fact, she enjoyed all of this. Well, she

0:26:46.742 --> 0:26:50.941
<v Speaker 5>can have enjoyed A and not have wanted B. And

0:26:50.982 --> 0:26:55.422
<v Speaker 5>so these cases are always especially for victims of sexual assault.

0:26:55.742 --> 0:26:59.661
<v Speaker 5>I think that they're incredibly confronting. It's going to be

0:26:59.702 --> 0:27:03.741
<v Speaker 5>particularly confronting because experts think that there is vision of

0:27:03.782 --> 0:27:06.621
<v Speaker 5>a lot of what occurred, and there could be tapes

0:27:06.661 --> 0:27:11.982
<v Speaker 5>played in this courtroom, and some victims claim that they

0:27:12.141 --> 0:27:15.262
<v Speaker 5>were made to look like they enjoyed things or they

0:27:15.262 --> 0:27:19.542
<v Speaker 5>were under the influence of drugs in those particular videos.

0:27:19.581 --> 0:27:25.182
<v Speaker 5>But it will be very damning for a number of celebrities,

0:27:25.182 --> 0:27:27.902
<v Speaker 5>and there will be celebrities named over the next eight

0:27:27.942 --> 0:27:29.942
<v Speaker 5>to ten weeks.

0:27:30.581 --> 0:27:34.221
<v Speaker 3>After the break. If you have a partner and they're breathing, typing,

0:27:34.422 --> 0:27:37.542
<v Speaker 3>or chewing near you right now, that deep rumbling hatred

0:27:37.621 --> 0:27:40.621
<v Speaker 3>you're feeling, it's got a name, and apparently it's a

0:27:40.621 --> 0:27:41.061
<v Speaker 3>good thing.

0:27:41.702 --> 0:27:44.421
<v Speaker 1>Do you want daily outloud access? Why wouldn't you? We

0:27:44.581 --> 0:27:49.581
<v Speaker 1>drop episides every Tuesday and Thursday exclusively for Muma MEA subscribers.

0:27:49.861 --> 0:27:51.542
<v Speaker 1>Follow the link in the show notes to get us

0:27:51.581 --> 0:27:54.141
<v Speaker 1>in your ears five days a week and a huge

0:27:54.141 --> 0:27:56.181
<v Speaker 1>thank you if you're already a subscriber.

0:28:00.821 --> 0:28:03.101
<v Speaker 4>What is normal marital hatred?

0:28:04.182 --> 0:28:11.981
<v Speaker 6>The essential rhythm of all relationships is harmony, disharmony and repair, closeness, disruption,

0:28:12.581 --> 0:28:15.261
<v Speaker 6>and a return to closeness. That's where the skills come in,

0:28:15.302 --> 0:28:18.502
<v Speaker 6>how to move from disruption to repair. Our culture doesn't

0:28:18.542 --> 0:28:22.901
<v Speaker 6>teach it. We don't deal with reality. The father of

0:28:23.302 --> 0:28:26.661
<v Speaker 6>couple's therapy back in the fifties said, the day you

0:28:26.821 --> 0:28:29.901
<v Speaker 6>turn to the person who's next to you and you say,

0:28:30.022 --> 0:28:32.621
<v Speaker 6>this is a mistake I've been had, This is not

0:28:32.782 --> 0:28:35.061
<v Speaker 6>the person I fell in love with, that said FRAMO

0:28:35.262 --> 0:28:36.861
<v Speaker 6>is the first day of your real Mary.

0:28:37.182 --> 0:28:39.822
<v Speaker 3>The voice you just heard is a guy called Dr

0:28:39.902 --> 0:28:42.822
<v Speaker 3>Terry Reel, and he was on the Tim Ferris podcast,

0:28:43.182 --> 0:28:45.022
<v Speaker 3>and he's a guy who has lots of letters after

0:28:45.062 --> 0:28:46.902
<v Speaker 3>his name that Jesse would think were very important for

0:28:46.942 --> 0:28:48.862
<v Speaker 3>me to tell you, but I'm choosing just to tell

0:28:48.902 --> 0:28:51.742
<v Speaker 3>you that he's worked in couple's therapy for a really

0:28:51.782 --> 0:28:54.382
<v Speaker 3>long time, and he says that he's been going around

0:28:54.422 --> 0:28:57.982
<v Speaker 3>the world talking about what he calls normal marital hatred

0:28:58.661 --> 0:29:01.622
<v Speaker 3>for years and not one person has ever come to

0:29:01.661 --> 0:29:04.862
<v Speaker 3>him afterwards and said, I don't know what you're talking about.

0:29:06.622 --> 0:29:09.501
<v Speaker 5>Except for Holly, who says, can I have normal marital

0:29:09.622 --> 0:29:11.022
<v Speaker 5>hatred if I am not married?

0:29:11.342 --> 0:29:11.902
<v Speaker 1>Exactly?

0:29:13.062 --> 0:29:16.661
<v Speaker 3>Does normal marital hatred sound familiar to you? To married

0:29:16.661 --> 0:29:20.782
<v Speaker 3>people who have been married for about two issues and

0:29:20.862 --> 0:29:26.302
<v Speaker 3>twenty ish years, respectively. Does normal marital hatred resonate?

0:29:26.622 --> 0:29:31.062
<v Speaker 5>I had no questions after listening to that excerpt, I went, yeah,

0:29:31.142 --> 0:29:33.622
<v Speaker 5>play on that. I have no questions. I did a

0:29:33.622 --> 0:29:37.062
<v Speaker 5>bit of research into it, and this therapist has had

0:29:37.142 --> 0:29:40.462
<v Speaker 5>a lot of criticism and a lot of blowback, especially

0:29:40.822 --> 0:29:45.781
<v Speaker 5>from female therapists who want to make clear that you

0:29:45.822 --> 0:29:49.662
<v Speaker 5>don't undermine your instincts. If you hate your partner, If

0:29:49.661 --> 0:29:52.461
<v Speaker 5>you hate your partner every day for three years, that

0:29:52.622 --> 0:29:55.502
<v Speaker 5>is not normal marital hatred. And of course, in cases

0:29:55.582 --> 0:29:59.262
<v Speaker 5>of abuse or anything sinister, you listen to that gut instinct.

0:29:59.902 --> 0:30:03.102
<v Speaker 5>But there's a lot of discussion around the word hate,

0:30:03.142 --> 0:30:07.582
<v Speaker 5>and I think it's almost a definitional tension because hatred

0:30:07.702 --> 0:30:13.902
<v Speaker 5>means intense dislike, checks out, opposition or revulsion towards something. Yep,

0:30:14.022 --> 0:30:17.902
<v Speaker 5>that's what I mean. And it can pass very quickly.

0:30:18.342 --> 0:30:21.142
<v Speaker 5>So some people have said, compare it to how you

0:30:21.142 --> 0:30:24.862
<v Speaker 5>feel about a sibling, Like I know the feeling of

0:30:24.902 --> 0:30:30.262
<v Speaker 5>having intense hatred for Claire one minute and then going, hey,

0:30:30.582 --> 0:30:32.982
<v Speaker 5>do you want to eat some chocolate? And it passes

0:30:33.382 --> 0:30:38.422
<v Speaker 5>like very very quickly. But close personal relationships lead to

0:30:38.542 --> 0:30:41.661
<v Speaker 5>such an intensity of feeling, And do you see parts

0:30:41.702 --> 0:30:43.261
<v Speaker 5>of them that are ugly? You see parts of your

0:30:43.262 --> 0:30:46.502
<v Speaker 5>self reflected back that are ugly. That's surely a sign

0:30:46.542 --> 0:30:49.822
<v Speaker 5>of real intimacy. If you have fleeting moments of hatred

0:30:49.982 --> 0:30:52.422
<v Speaker 5>mayor do you hate your husband some of the time

0:30:52.502 --> 0:30:53.502
<v Speaker 5>or all of the time.

0:30:54.462 --> 0:30:56.262
<v Speaker 1>Not all of the time. A, You're right, I think

0:30:56.302 --> 0:31:00.542
<v Speaker 1>it's about duration that's important. I know that in that moment,

0:31:01.182 --> 0:31:03.862
<v Speaker 1>and I've experienced that moment enough times, as I'm sure

0:31:03.862 --> 0:31:06.941
<v Speaker 1>he has, where you just go, oh, I can't imagine

0:31:06.942 --> 0:31:10.422
<v Speaker 1>anyway back from this. I can't imagine ever not feeling

0:31:10.462 --> 0:31:14.981
<v Speaker 1>this way about you. And sometimes I guess, well, for us,

0:31:15.022 --> 0:31:18.502
<v Speaker 1>it hasn't been true yet. Oh, I guess it was

0:31:18.542 --> 0:31:20.102
<v Speaker 1>true at one point because we did split up. But

0:31:20.782 --> 0:31:23.502
<v Speaker 1>I think you're right, like I also can't hold onto

0:31:23.622 --> 0:31:27.582
<v Speaker 1>things for very long. I've also been in relationships before

0:31:27.661 --> 0:31:32.262
<v Speaker 1>him where I felt that and it didn't pass, and

0:31:32.902 --> 0:31:36.102
<v Speaker 1>that feeling it's a different feeling because that was an

0:31:36.102 --> 0:31:40.582
<v Speaker 1>abusive relationship that I needed to end, and even though

0:31:40.742 --> 0:31:43.142
<v Speaker 1>I didn't feel that way all the time, because there

0:31:43.142 --> 0:31:46.181
<v Speaker 1>were incredible highs in that relationship, as there often are

0:31:46.782 --> 0:31:51.982
<v Speaker 1>in abusive relationships. There were incredible highs, but the lows

0:31:52.062 --> 0:31:57.222
<v Speaker 1>just felt different. They didn't feel fleeting, they felt fundamental,

0:31:57.422 --> 0:32:00.382
<v Speaker 1>and so much of it actually was not how I

0:32:00.382 --> 0:32:03.022
<v Speaker 1>felt about the person, but how I felt about myself

0:32:03.102 --> 0:32:04.222
<v Speaker 1>in those low moments.

0:32:04.661 --> 0:32:07.622
<v Speaker 3>And that's also can be when you feel the normal

0:32:07.702 --> 0:32:10.342
<v Speaker 3>nratal hatred in a vert Commas die directed at you.

0:32:10.982 --> 0:32:13.782
<v Speaker 3>Because we're talking a lot about this, like I can't

0:32:13.782 --> 0:32:15.942
<v Speaker 3>bear it when they do this thing. I can't bear

0:32:15.982 --> 0:32:18.782
<v Speaker 3>it when they type too loudly, breathe too loudly, put

0:32:18.782 --> 0:32:22.342
<v Speaker 3>that thing on there, you know whatever. But when you

0:32:22.582 --> 0:32:24.982
<v Speaker 3>feel it back at you, when you think, oh my god,

0:32:25.622 --> 0:32:30.781
<v Speaker 3>they hate me right now, that's very confronting, right And

0:32:30.822 --> 0:32:32.421
<v Speaker 3>one of the points that this guy makes. And I'm

0:32:32.422 --> 0:32:34.941
<v Speaker 3>glad you brought that context, Jesse, because when I first

0:32:34.942 --> 0:32:37.181
<v Speaker 3>saw this, and I don't know a great deal about him,

0:32:37.222 --> 0:32:38.701
<v Speaker 3>I was like, he sounds a bit like he's got

0:32:38.742 --> 0:32:41.302
<v Speaker 3>an agenda, Like he sounds a bit like he would

0:32:41.382 --> 0:32:45.782
<v Speaker 3>like women in particular maybe to stay in unhappy marriages

0:32:45.822 --> 0:32:47.822
<v Speaker 3>for a long time, which sometimes the kind of code

0:32:47.862 --> 0:32:50.862
<v Speaker 3>of you can get past it is code for you know,

0:32:51.182 --> 0:32:54.262
<v Speaker 3>stay where you are. And I think that that obviously

0:32:54.302 --> 0:32:57.662
<v Speaker 3>is not ideal. But the reason that obviously this catch phrase,

0:32:57.702 --> 0:33:00.422
<v Speaker 3>this normal marital hatred, travels so far is we all

0:33:00.462 --> 0:33:02.862
<v Speaker 3>feel it. And then when we have to recognize that

0:33:02.982 --> 0:33:06.462
<v Speaker 3>sometimes people feeling about us too, it shifts the way

0:33:06.502 --> 0:33:08.741
<v Speaker 3>you look at it. But if you're constantly feeling like

0:33:08.782 --> 0:33:11.662
<v Speaker 3>your partner doesn't like you, doesn't value you, all those things,

0:33:11.661 --> 0:33:12.462
<v Speaker 3>it's a different thing.

0:33:12.862 --> 0:33:17.102
<v Speaker 5>I was reading that all relationships, all close relationships, are

0:33:17.182 --> 0:33:19.981
<v Speaker 5>like a relational weather system, where there are storms and

0:33:20.022 --> 0:33:24.302
<v Speaker 5>there's springtime, and there's flowers and blue skies and frozen

0:33:24.342 --> 0:33:28.342
<v Speaker 5>pipes and electrical outages and all of that. And I

0:33:28.422 --> 0:33:32.701
<v Speaker 5>actually think we can also apply it to podcast host

0:33:33.342 --> 0:33:36.782
<v Speaker 5>hatred because there would be moments where, like, we spend

0:33:37.062 --> 0:33:39.062
<v Speaker 5>too much time together. I'm sure we can all agree,

0:33:39.062 --> 0:33:41.782
<v Speaker 5>and especially we've been touring tonight, we're on stage together,

0:33:42.342 --> 0:33:48.142
<v Speaker 5>there can be a moment where you just go oh maa, oh, holly, ugh, yeah,

0:33:48.182 --> 0:33:51.582
<v Speaker 5>and you feel this frustration, but it lifts as quickly

0:33:51.582 --> 0:33:55.262
<v Speaker 5>as it came on. And I think Esther Perrell talks

0:33:55.262 --> 0:33:57.502
<v Speaker 5>about I think the four horsemen of like what you

0:33:57.582 --> 0:33:59.662
<v Speaker 5>can't come back from, and her big thing is resentment

0:34:00.182 --> 0:34:04.662
<v Speaker 5>and how toxic resentment is to any relationship. You can

0:34:04.702 --> 0:34:08.662
<v Speaker 5>hate someone briefly, it doesn't imprint. It's like a feeling

0:34:08.702 --> 0:34:12.622
<v Speaker 5>of intense irritate more than anything, and then you forgive it.

0:34:12.782 --> 0:34:15.342
<v Speaker 3>And also it's like if you didn't care about someone

0:34:15.382 --> 0:34:18.301
<v Speaker 3>at all, you wouldn't have those powerful feelings about them.

0:34:18.382 --> 0:34:23.821
<v Speaker 3>It's like, I only get profoundly irritated or invested enough

0:34:23.822 --> 0:34:26.181
<v Speaker 3>to care about people who are close to me. If

0:34:26.221 --> 0:34:28.341
<v Speaker 3>I don't care at all, it's a sign that you're

0:34:28.382 --> 0:34:30.381
<v Speaker 3>not important in my life, you know what I mean?

0:34:30.622 --> 0:34:30.701
<v Speaker 4>Oh?

0:34:30.781 --> 0:34:32.741
<v Speaker 1>No, I have strong feelings about lots of people who

0:34:32.741 --> 0:34:37.382
<v Speaker 1>aren't important, who I've never met before. I have a question.

0:34:37.781 --> 0:34:42.261
<v Speaker 1>Does no marital hatred, which apparently you can come back from,

0:34:42.542 --> 0:34:43.942
<v Speaker 1>how does it compare to the ick?

0:34:44.342 --> 0:34:46.901
<v Speaker 3>Yeah? It sounds a lot like the ick, doesn't it. Well.

0:34:46.942 --> 0:34:49.062
<v Speaker 3>I've always pushed back on the idea you can't come

0:34:49.062 --> 0:34:51.181
<v Speaker 3>back from a nick. I think if you couldn't come

0:34:51.221 --> 0:34:53.821
<v Speaker 3>back from an ick, then no one would ever stay

0:34:53.822 --> 0:34:56.582
<v Speaker 3>in a long relationship because there are always going to

0:34:56.582 --> 0:34:59.102
<v Speaker 3>be times in a relationship when you're living in close

0:34:59.142 --> 0:35:02.421
<v Speaker 3>proximity with someone, sharing a bathroom with someone, watching them

0:35:02.422 --> 0:35:04.221
<v Speaker 3>eat and do all of the intimate things that we

0:35:04.261 --> 0:35:06.462
<v Speaker 3>do all the time, that someone you love is going

0:35:06.542 --> 0:35:08.822
<v Speaker 3>to give you the ick. I believe you can bounce

0:35:08.862 --> 0:35:11.542
<v Speaker 3>back from the ick if the other respects are in place.

0:35:11.622 --> 0:35:12.382
<v Speaker 3>That's what I think.

0:35:12.701 --> 0:35:15.142
<v Speaker 5>I reckon. This is so different to the ick, the

0:35:15.221 --> 0:35:17.301
<v Speaker 5>feeling of I will be having an argument with my

0:35:17.822 --> 0:35:20.982
<v Speaker 5>sister or Luca will have done something the other day.

0:35:20.982 --> 0:35:22.902
<v Speaker 5>I had a really frustrating day and I had to

0:35:22.942 --> 0:35:25.341
<v Speaker 5>blame it on someone, and it really worked when I

0:35:25.382 --> 0:35:29.221
<v Speaker 5>decided it was Luca's far And you almost want to

0:35:29.261 --> 0:35:31.661
<v Speaker 5>say I hate you, like you just want to say it.

0:35:31.741 --> 0:35:34.502
<v Speaker 5>You know you don't mean it. You know it's not

0:35:34.542 --> 0:35:38.542
<v Speaker 5>about anything. You couldn't even really explain why. But you're

0:35:38.542 --> 0:35:43.702
<v Speaker 5>not disgusted by them. You're just filled up with anger.

0:35:43.862 --> 0:35:47.502
<v Speaker 5>And I reckon that parenting compounds that, because you know

0:35:48.062 --> 0:35:51.982
<v Speaker 5>that you shouldn't hate your kids. So there are moments

0:35:51.982 --> 0:35:55.422
<v Speaker 5>where like your buttons are being pushed and your patience

0:35:55.781 --> 0:35:59.582
<v Speaker 5>is all being invested into this little person who doesn't

0:35:59.582 --> 0:36:02.781
<v Speaker 5>know any better. But your partner can handle it, and

0:36:02.862 --> 0:36:06.341
<v Speaker 5>so you kind of re orient it towards them.

0:36:06.942 --> 0:36:09.701
<v Speaker 3>That's all we've got time for today, out louders, I

0:36:09.701 --> 0:36:12.261
<v Speaker 3>hope you've enjoyed listening to today's show, and massive thank

0:36:12.342 --> 0:36:14.341
<v Speaker 3>you for our fabulous team for putting it together under

0:36:14.502 --> 0:36:18.022
<v Speaker 3>tough circumstances, everybody being in a different place. We will

0:36:18.062 --> 0:36:19.502
<v Speaker 3>be back in your ears tomorrow.

0:36:19.701 --> 0:36:21.701
<v Speaker 5>Can I ask, do you reckon that our audience has

0:36:21.781 --> 0:36:22.982
<v Speaker 5>normal hatred towards us?

0:36:23.022 --> 0:36:24.221
<v Speaker 3>Sometimes? Definitely?

0:36:24.622 --> 0:36:26.301
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, Like on.

0:36:26.302 --> 0:36:28.381
<v Speaker 5>A bad day, they chuck us in and they go,

0:36:28.701 --> 0:36:31.662
<v Speaker 5>Jesse is pissing me off today.

0:36:32.022 --> 0:36:35.062
<v Speaker 1>I think that's when they like shout also at like

0:36:35.142 --> 0:36:37.102
<v Speaker 1>they might be in the car, or they later shout

0:36:37.102 --> 0:36:39.222
<v Speaker 1>in their heads. Sometimes they say they shout out loud

0:36:39.902 --> 0:36:40.422
<v Speaker 1>at us.

0:36:40.582 --> 0:36:42.782
<v Speaker 5>I reckon when you're feeling like that totally valid feeling,

0:36:42.822 --> 0:36:44.741
<v Speaker 5>I reckon. You don't got to leave a review. I

0:36:44.741 --> 0:36:45.462
<v Speaker 5>think that's fine.

0:36:46.342 --> 0:36:47.622
<v Speaker 1>That's a good time to step away.

0:36:47.862 --> 0:36:51.341
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, yeah, a review if you are looking for something

0:36:51.382 --> 0:36:53.302
<v Speaker 5>else to listen to. This is if you're not feeling

0:36:53.302 --> 0:36:57.502
<v Speaker 5>profound hatred right now. On yesterday's episode, we invited Amelia

0:36:57.582 --> 0:37:01.542
<v Speaker 5>Lester on the show to share her story about being

0:37:01.661 --> 0:37:05.542
<v Speaker 5>at Harvard University with Mark Zuckerberg. We should say we

0:37:05.822 --> 0:37:09.181
<v Speaker 5>forced Amelia Leicester show us his story. Amelia is not

0:37:10.181 --> 0:37:12.542
<v Speaker 5>kind of going through the world going ask me about Mark.

0:37:13.302 --> 0:37:16.542
<v Speaker 1>This wasn't her idea. It wasn't because there was someone

0:37:16.622 --> 0:37:20.222
<v Speaker 1>with intense hatred in that moment who left a review.

0:37:20.302 --> 0:37:23.421
<v Speaker 1>Last time she mentioned Mark Zuckerberg and Harvard. But we're

0:37:23.462 --> 0:37:25.301
<v Speaker 1>always the ones that bring it up, so we want

0:37:25.302 --> 0:37:26.661
<v Speaker 1>to make that clear, and.

0:37:26.582 --> 0:37:29.062
<v Speaker 5>In our private lives, we should say Amelia doesn't even

0:37:29.102 --> 0:37:30.341
<v Speaker 5>bring up Mark Zuckerberg as.

0:37:30.342 --> 0:37:31.982
<v Speaker 1>Much as I would if at one time.

0:37:32.462 --> 0:37:35.542
<v Speaker 5>So look, if you are interested, it is so interesting.

0:37:35.582 --> 0:37:37.582
<v Speaker 5>She tells us all about it, what he was like,

0:37:37.862 --> 0:37:39.102
<v Speaker 5>what it's been like since.

0:37:39.422 --> 0:37:41.861
<v Speaker 1>Except when she wears that sweatshirt that says Harvard and

0:37:41.982 --> 0:37:43.261
<v Speaker 1>Mark Zuckerberg signed it.

0:37:43.422 --> 0:37:45.781
<v Speaker 5>Signed it, that's actually very true. And when she gets

0:37:45.781 --> 0:37:48.142
<v Speaker 5>her phone out and she goes hey Mark and like

0:37:48.302 --> 0:37:50.462
<v Speaker 5>she's not him on the phone, then that's a bit arrogant.

0:37:50.502 --> 0:37:51.941
<v Speaker 1>But I'm just going to text my friend Mark.

0:37:52.142 --> 0:37:55.742
<v Speaker 5>Yes, we had a few questions for her. So listen

0:37:55.781 --> 0:37:58.781
<v Speaker 5>to yesterday's subscriber episode. There is a link in our

0:37:58.822 --> 0:38:03.221
<v Speaker 5>show notes. As always, Bye bye, shout out to any

0:38:03.261 --> 0:38:05.821
<v Speaker 5>Mum and Me a subscribers listening. If you love the

0:38:05.862 --> 0:38:08.622
<v Speaker 5>show and you want to support us, subscribing to Mom

0:38:08.622 --> 0:38:10.861
<v Speaker 5>and Mia is the very best way to do so.

0:38:11.221 --> 0:38:12.982
<v Speaker 5>There's a link in the episode description.