WEBVTT - Trump. This Changes Everything.

0:00:10.327 --> 0:00:13.047
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to a MoMA Mia podcast.

0:00:13.727 --> 0:00:16.767
<v Speaker 2>Mamma Mia acknowledges the traditional owners of land and waters

0:00:16.807 --> 0:00:18.367
<v Speaker 2>that this podcast is recorded on.

0:00:18.727 --> 0:00:21.847
<v Speaker 3>It's a Woman's Will. Lucky to be.

0:00:23.167 --> 0:00:32.887
<v Speaker 2>Ah, Hello, and welcome to Mamma Mia. Out loud. It's

0:00:32.927 --> 0:00:35.567
<v Speaker 2>what women are actually talking about on Monday, the fifteenth

0:00:35.567 --> 0:00:35.967
<v Speaker 2>of July.

0:00:36.127 --> 0:00:38.167
<v Speaker 4>I'm Holly Wayne, right, I'm mea Friedman, and.

0:00:38.127 --> 0:00:40.647
<v Speaker 3>I'm Jesse Stevens. And I went to actually message our

0:00:40.687 --> 0:00:43.367
<v Speaker 3>producer and say, silly, silly, you've got the date wrong

0:00:43.527 --> 0:00:45.207
<v Speaker 3>because I couldn't believe it was the fifteenth of July.

0:00:45.687 --> 0:00:48.527
<v Speaker 3>I wanted to say to her, Oh, no, that's wrong.

0:00:48.567 --> 0:00:49.527
<v Speaker 4>When did you think it was?

0:00:49.887 --> 0:00:51.927
<v Speaker 3>I don't know, the second of June or something.

0:00:52.127 --> 0:00:53.407
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that's fair.

0:00:53.527 --> 0:00:57.687
<v Speaker 2>We're racing through, yeah, through this year, and thank god

0:00:57.887 --> 0:01:00.887
<v Speaker 2>because i'd like it to be over already. On the

0:01:01.007 --> 0:01:04.767
<v Speaker 2>show today, the bullet that missed former President Trump but

0:01:04.927 --> 0:01:09.327
<v Speaker 2>changed everything about the American election. Also, It's a Woman's Will,

0:01:09.527 --> 0:01:12.407
<v Speaker 2>and we're waving drills while wearing teeny tiny bikinis and

0:01:12.447 --> 0:01:15.247
<v Speaker 2>putting petrol in our butts. It's Katy Perry's come back

0:01:15.327 --> 0:01:18.847
<v Speaker 2>and you're living in it. And Vail Shannondoherty, who was

0:01:18.967 --> 0:01:21.727
<v Speaker 2>very clear that haters were not going to be welcome

0:01:21.767 --> 0:01:24.647
<v Speaker 2>at her funeral, a rule that likely means her husband

0:01:24.687 --> 0:01:28.407
<v Speaker 2>is not invited. But first at least eight shots in

0:01:28.607 --> 0:01:30.207
<v Speaker 2>just a few seconds.

0:01:30.247 --> 0:01:32.527
<v Speaker 3>That may change America forever.

0:01:32.927 --> 0:01:33.967
<v Speaker 4>Take a look at what happened.

0:01:41.367 --> 0:01:44.767
<v Speaker 2>Former US President Donald Trump has survived an attempt on

0:01:44.807 --> 0:01:47.967
<v Speaker 2>his life at a campaign rally. The FBI says it

0:01:48.047 --> 0:01:50.727
<v Speaker 2>is treating the shooting as an assassination attempt.

0:01:50.807 --> 0:01:53.367
<v Speaker 5>Law enforcement officials say the person who opened fired was

0:01:53.487 --> 0:01:55.527
<v Speaker 5>twenty year old Thomas Matthew Crooks.

0:01:55.647 --> 0:02:01.047
<v Speaker 6>We are not enemies. We're neighbors. We're friends, co workers, citizens,

0:02:01.367 --> 0:02:05.407
<v Speaker 6>and most importantly, we are fellow Americans. We must stand together.

0:02:05.687 --> 0:02:08.487
<v Speaker 6>There is no place in America for this kind of violence,

0:02:08.967 --> 0:02:14.407
<v Speaker 6>for any violence, ever, period, no exceptions. We can allow

0:02:14.447 --> 0:02:17.927
<v Speaker 6>this violence to be normalized. You know, the political regular

0:02:17.967 --> 0:02:21.647
<v Speaker 6>this country has gotten very heated. It's time to call

0:02:21.727 --> 0:02:22.087
<v Speaker 6>it down.

0:02:22.487 --> 0:02:25.767
<v Speaker 2>Yesterday, Donald Trump survived an attempt on his life and

0:02:25.807 --> 0:02:29.807
<v Speaker 2>it's changed everything about the American election. We very much

0:02:29.887 --> 0:02:32.127
<v Speaker 2>doubt that you haven't heard about this, but we're here

0:02:32.167 --> 0:02:34.607
<v Speaker 2>to fill in some gaps and unpack some smart people's

0:02:34.647 --> 0:02:39.087
<v Speaker 2>opinions about what comes next. Former President Trump was speaking

0:02:39.127 --> 0:02:41.967
<v Speaker 2>at a rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, at about six o'clock

0:02:41.967 --> 0:02:43.647
<v Speaker 2>on Saturday evening US time.

0:02:43.807 --> 0:02:44.047
<v Speaker 6>Now.

0:02:44.207 --> 0:02:48.367
<v Speaker 2>Butler is a smallish regional community on the outskirts of Pittsburgh,

0:02:48.607 --> 0:02:50.767
<v Speaker 2>and he was talking in a kind of like show

0:02:50.887 --> 0:02:54.447
<v Speaker 2>ground space usually used for the town's very popular farm show,

0:02:54.767 --> 0:02:57.167
<v Speaker 2>and experts say that that kind of space in a

0:02:57.247 --> 0:03:01.167
<v Speaker 2>rural area with very few surrounding buildings is actually should

0:03:01.207 --> 0:03:03.687
<v Speaker 2>be much easier to secure than if you were in

0:03:03.727 --> 0:03:05.527
<v Speaker 2>a city or any kind of place that had lots

0:03:05.527 --> 0:03:08.927
<v Speaker 2>of overlooking buildings. So in theory, it's a relatively easy

0:03:08.927 --> 0:03:12.887
<v Speaker 2>to see cure spot. All the same alone, gunman on

0:03:12.967 --> 0:03:15.607
<v Speaker 2>the roof of a car park aimed his ar style

0:03:15.767 --> 0:03:19.367
<v Speaker 2>rifle at the former president and took several shots. One

0:03:19.487 --> 0:03:22.807
<v Speaker 2>whiz passed his ear, nicking it and causing the former

0:03:22.847 --> 0:03:25.927
<v Speaker 2>president to duck and for his Secret Service agents to

0:03:25.967 --> 0:03:27.887
<v Speaker 2>do what they're paid to do and pile on top

0:03:27.967 --> 0:03:29.887
<v Speaker 2>of him to take any further bullets.

0:03:30.127 --> 0:03:34.527
<v Speaker 7>I found those images incredibly moving. Isn't necessarily the right word,

0:03:34.607 --> 0:03:38.167
<v Speaker 7>but it really made me think about what they do

0:03:38.487 --> 0:03:42.087
<v Speaker 7>every day. Like that instinct, It's like Keny first responders, right.

0:03:42.527 --> 0:03:45.127
<v Speaker 7>Your instinct is to move away from danger, but they

0:03:45.287 --> 0:03:50.847
<v Speaker 7>literally put their body between the person they're protecting and danger.

0:03:51.367 --> 0:03:54.167
<v Speaker 2>There were no further bullets because a sniper had shot

0:03:54.167 --> 0:03:56.967
<v Speaker 2>and killed the gunman, twenty year old Thomas Crooks, but

0:03:57.127 --> 0:03:59.487
<v Speaker 2>not before his bullets took the life of a man

0:03:59.567 --> 0:04:03.767
<v Speaker 2>attending the rally, fifty year old Corey Compartori. Then, and

0:04:03.807 --> 0:04:06.047
<v Speaker 2>this is the part that you've seen over and over

0:04:06.167 --> 0:04:08.407
<v Speaker 2>on your phone's TV screens and on the front of

0:04:08.447 --> 0:04:12.167
<v Speaker 2>every newspaper in the world today. As Trump is ushered off,

0:04:12.287 --> 0:04:14.927
<v Speaker 2>he shakes off his service agents to rise head and

0:04:14.967 --> 0:04:17.567
<v Speaker 2>shoulders above them, which is, by the way, very much

0:04:17.567 --> 0:04:19.967
<v Speaker 2>against protocol. The whole point is that they're supposed to

0:04:20.607 --> 0:04:23.047
<v Speaker 2>cover you, so that if there are more bullets coming,

0:04:23.047 --> 0:04:25.127
<v Speaker 2>more gunmen there, they will get the shots, not you.

0:04:25.647 --> 0:04:28.847
<v Speaker 2>He riises head and shoulders above them, raises a fist,

0:04:29.167 --> 0:04:31.487
<v Speaker 2>and with his face splattered with his own blood, he

0:04:31.607 --> 0:04:36.327
<v Speaker 2>shouts fight, Fight, Fight. Jesse, what did you think when

0:04:36.407 --> 0:04:38.207
<v Speaker 2>you first saw this story.

0:04:38.567 --> 0:04:40.847
<v Speaker 3>It's weird, isn't it. It just pops up in your Instagram

0:04:40.847 --> 0:04:44.487
<v Speaker 3>feet alongside someone's picture from Europe, and it popped up

0:04:44.727 --> 0:04:49.407
<v Speaker 3>and I went, oh, and I'm horrified by this story,

0:04:49.487 --> 0:04:52.647
<v Speaker 3>and I, you know, echo everyone who just says this

0:04:52.847 --> 0:04:55.327
<v Speaker 3>is not what democracy is. I think it's really scary.

0:04:55.327 --> 0:04:57.487
<v Speaker 3>I think it's a really traumatic incident. I think the

0:04:57.527 --> 0:04:59.647
<v Speaker 3>biggest tragedy is the person who lost their lives and

0:04:59.687 --> 0:05:01.967
<v Speaker 3>people who are in a critical condition that's been really

0:05:02.007 --> 0:05:05.167
<v Speaker 3>lost in this. I think that someone died for demonstrating

0:05:05.167 --> 0:05:08.287
<v Speaker 3>their political beliefs, which should never happen in a democracy.

0:05:09.247 --> 0:05:12.007
<v Speaker 3>But I actually don't think I was surprised. There was

0:05:12.047 --> 0:05:15.927
<v Speaker 3>a moment of almost having expected this, which I have

0:05:16.047 --> 0:05:19.167
<v Speaker 3>found in a lot of the commentary as well. And

0:05:19.207 --> 0:05:22.207
<v Speaker 3>the commentary allowed me to understand why I felt that way,

0:05:22.247 --> 0:05:26.447
<v Speaker 3>which was that the temperature had been rising so high

0:05:26.647 --> 0:05:30.607
<v Speaker 3>in the US, and the way that these two candidates

0:05:30.727 --> 0:05:34.767
<v Speaker 3>speak to and about each other is so intense. You know,

0:05:34.847 --> 0:05:37.007
<v Speaker 3>a lot of commentators have said, how did it take

0:05:37.047 --> 0:05:40.367
<v Speaker 3>this long for there to be an act of violence

0:05:40.767 --> 0:05:43.647
<v Speaker 3>like this? But then, of course we remember that Nancy Pelosi,

0:05:43.727 --> 0:05:46.087
<v Speaker 3>that was only a few years ago that her husband

0:05:46.327 --> 0:05:49.087
<v Speaker 3>was bludgeoned in his own home. And then there was

0:05:49.167 --> 0:05:52.647
<v Speaker 3>Brett Kavanagh. Someone tried to assassinate him after abortion laws

0:05:52.647 --> 0:05:55.407
<v Speaker 3>were turned back there's been someone setting themselves a light

0:05:55.687 --> 0:06:01.527
<v Speaker 3>outside Donald Trump's trial. Something like thirty seven people have

0:06:01.887 --> 0:06:05.007
<v Speaker 3>died in like politically motivated attacks in the last few years,

0:06:05.047 --> 0:06:09.727
<v Speaker 3>because in the US there doesn't seem to be a

0:06:09.767 --> 0:06:12.927
<v Speaker 3>peaceful center. It's like the other side is your enemy.

0:06:13.447 --> 0:06:17.527
<v Speaker 3>And to watch this, I realized that both sides had deteriorated,

0:06:17.887 --> 0:06:20.727
<v Speaker 3>that there's been this representation from Democrats and from the

0:06:20.807 --> 0:06:24.727
<v Speaker 3>left that you know, the deplorables and fake news and

0:06:25.087 --> 0:06:27.167
<v Speaker 3>all that kind of stuff. The riot, of course, the

0:06:27.207 --> 0:06:32.447
<v Speaker 3>insurrection the January sixth Capital event, and that was Republicans.

0:06:32.487 --> 0:06:36.847
<v Speaker 3>But this, I went, oh, this was an attack on Trump,

0:06:37.127 --> 0:06:41.287
<v Speaker 3>and now he's seen as a martyr, and this will

0:06:41.367 --> 0:06:43.807
<v Speaker 3>be if he wasn't already going to win this election,

0:06:44.327 --> 0:06:45.407
<v Speaker 3>that man will win the election.

0:06:45.727 --> 0:06:48.367
<v Speaker 2>Mia, What did you think of the image, the image

0:06:48.407 --> 0:06:50.527
<v Speaker 2>that I just described of him with the blood and

0:06:50.567 --> 0:06:54.047
<v Speaker 2>his fist up, it's visceral, will definitely and to the

0:06:54.087 --> 0:06:56.727
<v Speaker 2>history books as one of the most important news images

0:06:56.767 --> 0:06:58.967
<v Speaker 2>of our time. What does it make you feel.

0:06:59.087 --> 0:07:02.687
<v Speaker 7>I felt oddly detached when I heard this news, and

0:07:02.727 --> 0:07:04.287
<v Speaker 7>I've been trying to work out why. I mean, part

0:07:04.287 --> 0:07:07.847
<v Speaker 7>of it is just going into adrenaline mode with breaking news.

0:07:07.927 --> 0:07:09.527
<v Speaker 4>But I also knew.

0:07:11.007 --> 0:07:16.927
<v Speaker 7>That it, like seemingly everything, it would play into his hands.

0:07:17.247 --> 0:07:20.967
<v Speaker 7>Because that image was so interesting to me because for

0:07:21.007 --> 0:07:23.887
<v Speaker 7>those out louders who were old enough to remember the

0:07:23.927 --> 0:07:27.447
<v Speaker 7>attempted assassination of Ronald Reagan in the eighties by a

0:07:27.487 --> 0:07:31.207
<v Speaker 7>lone crazy gunman who was trying to impress Jodie Foster,

0:07:31.287 --> 0:07:33.287
<v Speaker 7>who was a young actress at the time. So it

0:07:33.327 --> 0:07:37.327
<v Speaker 7>wasn't even politically motivated by a guy called John Hinckley.

0:07:37.367 --> 0:07:42.647
<v Speaker 7>What you saw in that footage was grainy, like people panicked, ducking.

0:07:43.327 --> 0:07:46.247
<v Speaker 7>But what was interesting about Donald Trump's instincts is that

0:07:46.567 --> 0:07:49.327
<v Speaker 7>your instincts, you would think would be to hide from danger,

0:07:49.407 --> 0:07:54.047
<v Speaker 7>self protection. But he knew in that moment that the

0:07:54.087 --> 0:07:58.807
<v Speaker 7>cameras were on him, and he was defiant without knowing

0:07:59.207 --> 0:08:02.367
<v Speaker 7>what the attack was, what had happened, how safe he was,

0:08:02.407 --> 0:08:04.207
<v Speaker 7>how safe he was that it was in fact an

0:08:04.207 --> 0:08:05.367
<v Speaker 7>assassination attempt.

0:08:06.127 --> 0:08:08.967
<v Speaker 4>He straightway said fight fight it.

0:08:09.367 --> 0:08:11.007
<v Speaker 3>That meant fight who.

0:08:11.607 --> 0:08:15.647
<v Speaker 7>Donald Trump has always fashioned himself as the underdog and

0:08:15.687 --> 0:08:18.967
<v Speaker 7>as a victim, and even when he was president, he

0:08:19.087 --> 0:08:22.447
<v Speaker 7>was always trying to make it that everybody was against him,

0:08:22.767 --> 0:08:25.327
<v Speaker 7>and he wasn't getting the credit he deserved and the

0:08:25.367 --> 0:08:28.127
<v Speaker 7>respect that he deserved, and that he was a victim

0:08:28.167 --> 0:08:30.847
<v Speaker 7>of the fake news media who were lying about him.

0:08:30.887 --> 0:08:33.927
<v Speaker 7>And he actually won the election and people said that

0:08:33.967 --> 0:08:38.327
<v Speaker 7>he didn't. So his posture has always been very I'm

0:08:38.327 --> 0:08:40.727
<v Speaker 7>the underdog, which is ironic for a guy who is

0:08:40.767 --> 0:08:43.647
<v Speaker 7>as privileged as him and was literally the president of

0:08:43.647 --> 0:08:48.647
<v Speaker 7>the United States. So I knew instantly that that image

0:08:49.607 --> 0:08:52.287
<v Speaker 7>will probably win him the election, if he wasn't already going.

0:08:52.247 --> 0:08:54.087
<v Speaker 4>To win it. And the thing about it because it

0:08:54.087 --> 0:08:57.247
<v Speaker 4>makes him a martyr. Yeah, and of course all the discourse,

0:08:57.447 --> 0:09:00.327
<v Speaker 4>what's so maddening about it? And I knew in that moment.

0:09:00.767 --> 0:09:02.727
<v Speaker 7>He has a way of it's a little bit like

0:09:03.007 --> 0:09:05.207
<v Speaker 7>I know you are, but what am I. He takes

0:09:05.287 --> 0:09:08.567
<v Speaker 7>anything that anyone says about him, like fake news, for

0:09:08.567 --> 0:09:11.647
<v Speaker 7>example's people were trying to say when he was just

0:09:11.687 --> 0:09:15.167
<v Speaker 7>making out lies about Hillary Clinton and about Quanon, kind

0:09:15.207 --> 0:09:17.967
<v Speaker 7>of conspiracy theories when he was running in twenty sixteen.

0:09:18.447 --> 0:09:21.487
<v Speaker 7>He twisted that and used it to anything that he

0:09:21.527 --> 0:09:24.007
<v Speaker 7>didn't want people to believe about him. He just called

0:09:24.007 --> 0:09:26.127
<v Speaker 7>it fake news. He was the one that weaponized it.

0:09:26.327 --> 0:09:30.047
<v Speaker 7>And so now he's weaponizing the idea that the rhetoric,

0:09:30.047 --> 0:09:34.647
<v Speaker 7>because even you said, Jesse, both sides have been inflating it.

0:09:34.647 --> 0:09:38.007
<v Speaker 7>It actually hasn't been both sides. He's been called what

0:09:38.047 --> 0:09:40.847
<v Speaker 7>he actually is, which is a convicted rapist and felon

0:09:41.847 --> 0:09:45.767
<v Speaker 7>and an existential threat to democracy. Those are sort of facts, really,

0:09:46.567 --> 0:09:51.687
<v Speaker 7>but his language has always been incredibly incendiary, incredibly violent.

0:09:51.887 --> 0:09:53.967
<v Speaker 2>The thing is, too, though about the fight Fight, Fight,

0:09:54.767 --> 0:09:57.447
<v Speaker 2>is that there's Trump, but then there's also Trump's like

0:09:57.567 --> 0:10:01.207
<v Speaker 2>literal army. What we saw on January the sixth when

0:10:01.607 --> 0:10:07.127
<v Speaker 2>he incited a riot of people, armed people to invade

0:10:07.167 --> 0:10:09.927
<v Speaker 2>a government building, and we do not know what would

0:10:09.967 --> 0:10:14.527
<v Speaker 2>have happened to the high profile mostly democratic but not

0:10:14.567 --> 0:10:19.087
<v Speaker 2>only not only Democrats, enemies of Trump who were in

0:10:19.127 --> 0:10:21.127
<v Speaker 2>there if the mob had got their hands on them.

0:10:21.367 --> 0:10:25.567
<v Speaker 2>There is a literal sense of building a resistance under Trump,

0:10:25.647 --> 0:10:28.167
<v Speaker 2>and a lot of Americans who would not identify as

0:10:28.207 --> 0:10:31.687
<v Speaker 2>Republicans necessarily. No one knows why Thomas Crooks had twenty

0:10:31.767 --> 0:10:33.927
<v Speaker 2>years old, so young, my god, but did what he did.

0:10:34.007 --> 0:10:36.967
<v Speaker 2>But he is a registered Republican. But I don't know

0:10:37.007 --> 0:10:39.887
<v Speaker 2>that a lot of Trump supporters consider themselves Republicans. They're

0:10:39.887 --> 0:10:40.927
<v Speaker 2>Trump supporters, you know.

0:10:41.007 --> 0:10:43.127
<v Speaker 3>Just on the both sides thing. The reason that I'm

0:10:43.407 --> 0:10:45.847
<v Speaker 3>cautious here because I know that in terms of violence

0:10:45.967 --> 0:10:48.447
<v Speaker 3>entering political debate and Nancy Pelosi and you know, a

0:10:48.447 --> 0:10:51.127
<v Speaker 3>lot of the cases were Republicans, some.

0:10:51.047 --> 0:10:54.367
<v Speaker 7>Were Democrats, like a Bernie Sanders supporter attacked a congressman

0:10:54.447 --> 0:10:55.207
<v Speaker 7>a few years ago.

0:10:55.447 --> 0:10:57.927
<v Speaker 3>But with this, I did have a sense that in

0:10:57.967 --> 0:11:01.767
<v Speaker 3>the moments afterwards, when it was being twisted to be

0:11:01.967 --> 0:11:05.207
<v Speaker 3>about how this was Trump's fault, I just went, this

0:11:05.247 --> 0:11:08.567
<v Speaker 3>is a human being who is running for president in

0:11:08.607 --> 0:11:12.767
<v Speaker 3>a Democratic who just nearly by a centimeter, if his

0:11:12.927 --> 0:11:15.807
<v Speaker 3>head had moved to a centimeter, would have been killed

0:11:15.847 --> 0:11:18.087
<v Speaker 3>on a stage. Like I think we've got to be

0:11:18.287 --> 0:11:24.287
<v Speaker 3>careful not to blame him for the assassination attempt. And

0:11:24.327 --> 0:11:26.767
<v Speaker 3>I think that there are points throughout the campaigns and

0:11:26.887 --> 0:11:30.207
<v Speaker 3>points across the last eight to ten years where we

0:11:30.327 --> 0:11:34.527
<v Speaker 3>can go we've stooped to a certain level. But also

0:11:34.607 --> 0:11:38.327
<v Speaker 3>we have characterized Trump supporters and Trump himself as something

0:11:38.487 --> 0:11:39.287
<v Speaker 3>less than Jamie.

0:11:39.367 --> 0:11:42.687
<v Speaker 7>Politics in America used to be really boring, like really boring,

0:11:42.727 --> 0:11:46.687
<v Speaker 7>even with Ronald Dragan that was that wasn't a politically

0:11:46.727 --> 0:11:49.647
<v Speaker 7>motivated attack in the good old days politics was boring.

0:11:49.687 --> 0:11:53.487
<v Speaker 7>It's only since twenty fifteen that we've had things that

0:11:53.527 --> 0:11:57.807
<v Speaker 7>were previously unimaginable, like riots in the Capitol building and

0:11:57.847 --> 0:12:01.727
<v Speaker 7>people talking about hanging members of Yes.

0:12:01.767 --> 0:12:03.727
<v Speaker 3>But I've listened to both sides, left and right, and

0:12:03.767 --> 0:12:05.807
<v Speaker 3>this actually isn't just about Trump. This is just broadly

0:12:05.847 --> 0:12:07.967
<v Speaker 3>how we speak about people and the level of contempt

0:12:08.047 --> 0:12:11.247
<v Speaker 3>that's in our voice. And remember Hillary Clinton and the deplorables.

0:12:11.607 --> 0:12:15.367
<v Speaker 3>When you start representing people as less than human, when

0:12:15.367 --> 0:12:19.287
<v Speaker 3>you demonize the other side to such an extent, violence

0:12:19.327 --> 0:12:20.087
<v Speaker 3>seems like.

0:12:19.967 --> 0:12:23.727
<v Speaker 4>A started those chants of lock her up about Hillary Clinton.

0:12:24.087 --> 0:12:27.087
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the Democrats, But you can't I see what Jesse

0:12:27.167 --> 0:12:29.367
<v Speaker 2>is saying because the presidential debate that happened two weeks ago,

0:12:29.447 --> 0:12:31.407
<v Speaker 2>and everybody obviously the story out of that was all

0:12:31.447 --> 0:12:33.727
<v Speaker 2>about Biden's fitness for office, which we'll get to in

0:12:33.767 --> 0:12:36.687
<v Speaker 2>a second. But the thing that actually really struck me

0:12:36.727 --> 0:12:39.327
<v Speaker 2>about that is all the reports said, these men will

0:12:39.327 --> 0:12:41.847
<v Speaker 2>not say hello to each other, they will not shake hands,

0:12:42.047 --> 0:12:44.287
<v Speaker 2>they won't refer to each other. That is not how

0:12:44.327 --> 0:12:47.367
<v Speaker 2>politics used to be, right, It used to be like

0:12:47.447 --> 0:12:48.287
<v Speaker 2>a sporting game.

0:12:48.367 --> 0:12:50.207
<v Speaker 4>But you know, let me finish myself.

0:12:50.767 --> 0:12:52.927
<v Speaker 2>It's like a sporting game where on the field you

0:12:53.007 --> 0:12:56.007
<v Speaker 2>would take somebody's legs out whatever, and afterwards you shake

0:12:56.047 --> 0:12:57.687
<v Speaker 2>their hands and you change shits.

0:12:57.407 --> 0:13:00.047
<v Speaker 4>And when did that change? Whole agree, And.

0:13:00.127 --> 0:13:03.247
<v Speaker 2>There is no question for me about what side in

0:13:03.247 --> 0:13:06.807
<v Speaker 2>inverted commas I feel has heightened the debate. But I

0:13:06.847 --> 0:13:09.007
<v Speaker 2>also think it's to do with the fact that we

0:13:09.447 --> 0:13:11.527
<v Speaker 2>live in a very different time in terms of social media,

0:13:11.567 --> 0:13:12.767
<v Speaker 2>and we all know that, we talk about it all

0:13:12.767 --> 0:13:15.647
<v Speaker 2>the time, what the algorithm rewards, etc. It was striking

0:13:15.687 --> 0:13:18.527
<v Speaker 2>to me that in the British election that we just saw,

0:13:19.367 --> 0:13:22.047
<v Speaker 2>they are talking about each other with civility when they lose,

0:13:22.407 --> 0:13:26.007
<v Speaker 2>they are They're losing gracefully. And this is also Trump's fault,

0:13:26.007 --> 0:13:27.127
<v Speaker 2>to be honest, because.

0:13:26.887 --> 0:13:28.527
<v Speaker 4>The Australian election the.

0:13:28.447 --> 0:13:31.327
<v Speaker 2>Reason that people talk about Trump being a threat to democracy,

0:13:31.367 --> 0:13:33.447
<v Speaker 2>and some people in the aftermath of the shooting have

0:13:33.487 --> 0:13:37.127
<v Speaker 2>said that such hyperbole. It isn't. Because he lost an

0:13:37.127 --> 0:13:39.527
<v Speaker 2>election and he refused to get out of office. That

0:13:39.647 --> 0:13:43.807
<v Speaker 2>is the definition of threatening democracy. So that's all true anyway.

0:13:43.847 --> 0:13:46.207
<v Speaker 2>I want to ask Mia quickly to Jesse's point that

0:13:46.247 --> 0:13:49.727
<v Speaker 2>there's certainly not only one side here. Who's spinning. Almost

0:13:49.767 --> 0:13:55.007
<v Speaker 2>immediately after this happened, senior Democrats came out straight away

0:13:55.047 --> 0:13:57.087
<v Speaker 2>all what I would like to call the grown ups,

0:13:57.327 --> 0:14:00.967
<v Speaker 2>and condemned the actions of the gunman, no question, called

0:14:01.007 --> 0:14:04.247
<v Speaker 2>for calm, called for unity everybody from Obama to Biden

0:14:04.287 --> 0:14:07.527
<v Speaker 2>to world leaders around the country. But there was a

0:14:07.567 --> 0:14:10.847
<v Speaker 2>small portion of the left who went straight to work

0:14:10.967 --> 0:14:14.047
<v Speaker 2>accusing the right of a conspiracy MAA, what's blueing on?

0:14:14.327 --> 0:14:18.287
<v Speaker 7>Well, if QAnon is a collection of sort of conspiracy

0:14:18.367 --> 0:14:22.687
<v Speaker 7>theories held by right wingers, So overall, the beliefs of

0:14:22.767 --> 0:14:26.447
<v Speaker 7>QAnon that became really big during the Trump years that

0:14:26.487 --> 0:14:29.647
<v Speaker 7>the Secret Service, the CIA, the FBI, and the elites

0:14:30.087 --> 0:14:33.247
<v Speaker 7>are all working together to bring Trump down and to

0:14:33.727 --> 0:14:37.047
<v Speaker 7>abuse children, and that there's a cabal of selling children.

0:14:37.527 --> 0:14:40.367
<v Speaker 7>So that's sort of what QAnon is, and that Trump

0:14:40.367 --> 0:14:43.967
<v Speaker 7>has come to overthrow all of these evil people. And

0:14:44.247 --> 0:14:46.447
<v Speaker 7>what I hadn't heard about, but which has been around

0:14:46.487 --> 0:14:48.527
<v Speaker 7>in the last couple of years and really showed its

0:14:48.527 --> 0:14:52.287
<v Speaker 7>head after this assassination attempt is blueing on and that's

0:14:52.487 --> 0:14:55.927
<v Speaker 7>the conspiracy theories held by the left. So what you

0:14:56.007 --> 0:14:58.567
<v Speaker 7>might have seen over the weekend was the idea that

0:14:58.567 --> 0:15:01.167
<v Speaker 7>the Trump shooting was staged to make him seem sympathetic

0:15:01.207 --> 0:15:04.367
<v Speaker 7>and powerful, which is how it's gone down. But the

0:15:04.407 --> 0:15:08.127
<v Speaker 7>idea that it was just tomato sauce, and the way

0:15:08.167 --> 0:15:10.567
<v Speaker 7>that the Secret Service allowed him to put his head

0:15:10.607 --> 0:15:15.167
<v Speaker 7>up and pump his fist and say fight, fight, fight, Yeah, exactly,

0:15:15.407 --> 0:15:18.007
<v Speaker 7>and people saying that the image was just too perfect

0:15:18.087 --> 0:15:21.607
<v Speaker 7>of the upside down American flag and him with blood

0:15:21.687 --> 0:15:25.407
<v Speaker 7>but still looking defiant with his strong scale and not

0:15:25.447 --> 0:15:27.927
<v Speaker 7>looking scared or all the ways that you would have

0:15:27.927 --> 0:15:30.167
<v Speaker 7>thought he would look so. And this is where it is,

0:15:30.207 --> 0:15:34.327
<v Speaker 7>both sides being crazy QAnon and Blue and on fighting

0:15:34.367 --> 0:15:37.127
<v Speaker 7>it out and basically not believing anything that they see.

0:15:37.247 --> 0:15:37.487
<v Speaker 1>The thing.

0:15:37.687 --> 0:15:39.767
<v Speaker 2>It is not new or surprising at the moment that

0:15:39.847 --> 0:15:42.127
<v Speaker 2>there are no agreed on facts about anything ever.

0:15:42.367 --> 0:15:44.767
<v Speaker 3>And I saw that everywhere. It wasn't just in tiny

0:15:45.327 --> 0:15:48.247
<v Speaker 3>little niches on the internet, like it was all over

0:15:48.247 --> 0:15:50.887
<v Speaker 3>my TikTok feed, all over Instagram, people whose opinion I

0:15:50.927 --> 0:15:55.767
<v Speaker 3>respect saying almost immediately that they don't believe that this happened,

0:15:55.767 --> 0:15:57.767
<v Speaker 3>And I just went, this is how you know, the

0:15:57.847 --> 0:16:00.047
<v Speaker 3>divide just gets wider and wider and wide.

0:16:00.127 --> 0:16:00.287
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

0:16:00.327 --> 0:16:03.727
<v Speaker 7>Because of course it also reaffirms what the QAnon people think,

0:16:03.767 --> 0:16:04.647
<v Speaker 7>and a lot of Trump.

0:16:04.367 --> 0:16:06.207
<v Speaker 4>Supporters, which is that the Secret Service?

0:16:06.247 --> 0:16:08.847
<v Speaker 7>How did they miss it? People said they saw the sniper,

0:16:08.887 --> 0:16:11.247
<v Speaker 7>they tried to alert police and nothing was done. How

0:16:11.247 --> 0:16:11.967
<v Speaker 7>did it happen?

0:16:12.847 --> 0:16:16.207
<v Speaker 2>And they're blaming the Biden campaigns directly, So again, it

0:16:16.327 --> 0:16:19.247
<v Speaker 2>just shows how far we've gone in denying the humanity

0:16:19.247 --> 0:16:20.087
<v Speaker 2>of just a man.

0:16:20.727 --> 0:16:21.647
<v Speaker 4>Denying reality.

0:16:22.527 --> 0:16:25.687
<v Speaker 2>Okay, in the wake of the shooting, the US Democrats

0:16:25.807 --> 0:16:28.927
<v Speaker 2>pulled their multi multi million dollar ad campaign that they're

0:16:28.967 --> 0:16:31.287
<v Speaker 2>running at the minute, which attacks Trump and calls him

0:16:31.327 --> 0:16:32.887
<v Speaker 2>all the things that we have established that is.

0:16:33.127 --> 0:16:35.727
<v Speaker 3>Can I ask about that it Has Trump pulled anything?

0:16:35.847 --> 0:16:39.087
<v Speaker 7>No, immediately, I'm sure it's out already. There'll be images

0:16:39.127 --> 0:16:41.927
<v Speaker 7>of him bloody like that iconic even.

0:16:41.687 --> 0:16:44.927
<v Speaker 2>When the Republican Convention is about to start, and he

0:16:44.967 --> 0:16:48.687
<v Speaker 2>will be hailed a hero. The religious right are saying

0:16:48.727 --> 0:16:51.087
<v Speaker 2>this is proof that his presidency is ordained by God,

0:16:51.127 --> 0:16:54.087
<v Speaker 2>et cetera. Anyway, let's move over to the other side, which,

0:16:54.087 --> 0:16:56.087
<v Speaker 2>if we were recording this show on Friday, would have

0:16:56.087 --> 0:16:58.647
<v Speaker 2>been one we would have thought was the most unusual

0:16:58.687 --> 0:17:01.447
<v Speaker 2>development we'd had in a while in American politics, which

0:17:01.487 --> 0:17:05.687
<v Speaker 2>involves George Clooney. So while we're talking obviously about what

0:17:05.767 --> 0:17:09.007
<v Speaker 2>the assassination attempt has done for Trump's chances, in the

0:17:09.847 --> 0:17:12.727
<v Speaker 2>before the rally, many smart voices were saying that over

0:17:12.767 --> 0:17:16.047
<v Speaker 2>on the other side, President Biden would likely step down

0:17:16.127 --> 0:17:18.407
<v Speaker 2>on Sunday or Monday, not that he wants to. He

0:17:18.487 --> 0:17:21.687
<v Speaker 2>has been very publicly digging in and saying that only

0:17:21.687 --> 0:17:24.247
<v Speaker 2>the Lord Almighty can get him to step down. But

0:17:24.407 --> 0:17:26.527
<v Speaker 2>Democrats have been saying that in this case, the Lord

0:17:26.527 --> 0:17:29.687
<v Speaker 2>Almighty might take the form of George Clooney, who wrote

0:17:29.687 --> 0:17:32.287
<v Speaker 2>a column in The New York Times last Thursday headlined

0:17:32.447 --> 0:17:35.567
<v Speaker 2>I love Joe Biden, but we need a new nominee,

0:17:35.647 --> 0:17:38.607
<v Speaker 2>and in it he spoke about how he was one

0:17:38.647 --> 0:17:41.207
<v Speaker 2>of the main players at a big fundraiser for Biden

0:17:41.367 --> 0:17:44.127
<v Speaker 2>in June, and he said, I love Joe Biden as

0:17:44.127 --> 0:17:46.447
<v Speaker 2>a senator, as a vice president. I believe in his character,

0:17:46.487 --> 0:17:49.007
<v Speaker 2>I believe in his morals, etc. But the one battle

0:17:49.007 --> 0:17:51.887
<v Speaker 2>he cannot fight is the fight against time. None of

0:17:51.967 --> 0:17:54.327
<v Speaker 2>us can. It's devastating to say it, but the Joe

0:17:54.367 --> 0:17:56.647
<v Speaker 2>Biden I was with three weeks ago at the fundraiser

0:17:56.727 --> 0:17:59.447
<v Speaker 2>was not the Joe big fucking deal Biden of twenty ten.

0:17:59.727 --> 0:18:02.087
<v Speaker 2>He wasn't even the Joe Biden of twenty twenty. He

0:18:02.167 --> 0:18:04.447
<v Speaker 2>was the same man we all witnessed at the debate.

0:18:04.567 --> 0:18:08.567
<v Speaker 2>Clooney then name checked his choices. He interestingly put the

0:18:08.687 --> 0:18:11.727
<v Speaker 2>name Wes More first to obviously who he thinks should

0:18:11.727 --> 0:18:13.487
<v Speaker 2>get it. Let's say, from We's Moore, he says, and

0:18:13.527 --> 0:18:16.287
<v Speaker 2>Kamala Harris and Gretchen Whitner and governors and Andy Bscher

0:18:16.327 --> 0:18:18.447
<v Speaker 2>and so on and so on. Mia, Why does it

0:18:18.447 --> 0:18:21.327
<v Speaker 2>matter even a little bit what George Clooney thinks about

0:18:21.327 --> 0:18:22.687
<v Speaker 2>the president of the United.

0:18:22.367 --> 0:18:24.847
<v Speaker 7>States, Because there are two things that are required to

0:18:24.887 --> 0:18:27.567
<v Speaker 7>win the presidency. The first is people voting for you,

0:18:27.727 --> 0:18:30.527
<v Speaker 7>but the second is money to help make that happen.

0:18:31.087 --> 0:18:37.327
<v Speaker 7>And the donors on both sides have incredible power, not

0:18:37.407 --> 0:18:40.887
<v Speaker 7>necessarily in saying we want the candidate to be this person,

0:18:41.367 --> 0:18:44.287
<v Speaker 7>but there are certain candidates that will get more money

0:18:44.327 --> 0:18:46.967
<v Speaker 7>being donated to the party and other candidates who won't.

0:18:47.727 --> 0:18:50.167
<v Speaker 7>So for e then in a tap off, they're saying

0:18:50.207 --> 0:18:52.127
<v Speaker 7>we're going to turn the tap off, which is understandable

0:18:52.167 --> 0:18:55.207
<v Speaker 7>because if you believe that the wrong person is, you know,

0:18:55.367 --> 0:18:58.527
<v Speaker 7>driving the car, you're not going to keep paying for petrol,

0:18:58.647 --> 0:19:00.487
<v Speaker 7>you're going to say, well, why you're just going.

0:19:00.407 --> 0:19:01.447
<v Speaker 4>To drive the car off a cliff.

0:19:01.887 --> 0:19:05.247
<v Speaker 7>So with Joe Biden and why it could be George Clooney,

0:19:05.767 --> 0:19:07.567
<v Speaker 7>there've been a lot of talks in the same way

0:19:07.607 --> 0:19:11.127
<v Speaker 7>that people say, oh, Oprah should run for president, Michelle

0:19:11.127 --> 0:19:13.927
<v Speaker 7>Obama should run for president, George Clooney should run for president.

0:19:14.567 --> 0:19:16.367
<v Speaker 7>I don't think that's ever going to happen. But he

0:19:16.567 --> 0:19:19.127
<v Speaker 7>has been a power player behind the scenes. He's good

0:19:19.167 --> 0:19:21.887
<v Speaker 7>mates with Obama, and he's been a big supporter of

0:19:21.967 --> 0:19:24.807
<v Speaker 7>Joe Biden and that influence because it's not just the

0:19:24.847 --> 0:19:28.167
<v Speaker 7>money that George personally donates. It's when you've got big

0:19:28.207 --> 0:19:30.847
<v Speaker 7>Hollywood stars, people then pay money to go and be

0:19:30.967 --> 0:19:32.167
<v Speaker 7>at those fundraisers.

0:19:32.567 --> 0:19:33.287
<v Speaker 4>That's how it works.

0:19:33.287 --> 0:19:35.887
<v Speaker 7>So they're rain makers as well as being providers of

0:19:35.967 --> 0:19:39.767
<v Speaker 7>rain themselves. The position that the Democratic Party are in

0:19:39.807 --> 0:19:43.447
<v Speaker 7>that's difficult is that it's all relying on what Joe

0:19:43.447 --> 0:19:46.607
<v Speaker 7>Biden decides to do. And of course this weekend's changed everything.

0:19:47.207 --> 0:19:50.407
<v Speaker 7>But if everyone in the Democratic Party, if the members

0:19:50.407 --> 0:19:53.687
<v Speaker 7>of Congress say he needs to step down, and he doesn't,

0:19:54.567 --> 0:19:58.167
<v Speaker 7>then they're screwed. They've screwed their Party. So it's like

0:19:58.207 --> 0:20:04.127
<v Speaker 7>everybody's in this circle of being paralyzed because they have

0:20:04.167 --> 0:20:05.847
<v Speaker 7>to wait for it to be his decision. Now, George

0:20:05.847 --> 0:20:08.047
<v Speaker 7>Clooney doesn't care, like it doesn't matter. He can say

0:20:08.047 --> 0:20:09.207
<v Speaker 7>what he wants because he's a donor.

0:20:09.327 --> 0:20:12.327
<v Speaker 2>But Clooney is not just Clooney. Clooney is representative of

0:20:12.407 --> 0:20:15.567
<v Speaker 2>He is so embedded in the higher up Democratic Party

0:20:15.967 --> 0:20:19.527
<v Speaker 2>that he would not have written that without their endorsement,

0:20:19.567 --> 0:20:23.367
<v Speaker 2>their blessing, without So basically he's being a mouthpiece for

0:20:23.447 --> 0:20:25.367
<v Speaker 2>a large number of very senior Democrats.

0:20:25.447 --> 0:20:25.527
<v Speaker 7>Ye.

0:20:25.647 --> 0:20:28.367
<v Speaker 2>Now Biden has lost them. Yes, and it will be very,

0:20:28.527 --> 0:20:30.407
<v Speaker 2>very hard for Biden to keep holding on. What do

0:20:30.447 --> 0:20:32.607
<v Speaker 2>we think that Trump's assassination attempt does?

0:20:32.607 --> 0:20:32.767
<v Speaker 4>Though?

0:20:32.847 --> 0:20:36.247
<v Speaker 2>Imagining that Biden's getting under more pressure every minute and

0:20:36.367 --> 0:20:39.367
<v Speaker 2>plans are afoot and Pelosi isn't even really backing him anymore,

0:20:39.407 --> 0:20:42.647
<v Speaker 2>and Obama hasn't distanced himself from the Clooney column, then

0:20:43.407 --> 0:20:46.287
<v Speaker 2>do you go, well, now, it would be disrespectful for

0:20:46.367 --> 0:20:48.527
<v Speaker 2>us to do anything about anything for what a day,

0:20:48.647 --> 0:20:52.127
<v Speaker 2>a week, a month, And is a change of candidate

0:20:52.207 --> 0:20:54.647
<v Speaker 2>actually the best way to get the story back on you?

0:20:54.927 --> 0:20:57.847
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, they need a narrative because there's no story right now.

0:20:57.887 --> 0:21:00.847
<v Speaker 3>And even we were watching this morning, Joe Biden addressed

0:21:01.407 --> 0:21:05.927
<v Speaker 3>the nation the nation about what happened with Trump, and

0:21:06.607 --> 0:21:10.127
<v Speaker 3>he is just so unint bying. It is more of

0:21:10.127 --> 0:21:11.927
<v Speaker 3>what we've been seeing, which is this, it's just sad.

0:21:12.127 --> 0:21:13.727
<v Speaker 4>Every time he talks, it's sad.

0:21:13.847 --> 0:21:16.207
<v Speaker 3>Last week, I don't think we even talked about the

0:21:16.207 --> 0:21:20.647
<v Speaker 3>fact that he mixed up the names of warring presidents,

0:21:21.007 --> 0:21:27.407
<v Speaker 3>which is like we're talking about like steaks foreign policy

0:21:27.447 --> 0:21:30.767
<v Speaker 3>that you just go what's going on? And over the

0:21:30.767 --> 0:21:34.167
<v Speaker 3>weekend I kept thinking with Biden. What the Democrats are

0:21:34.207 --> 0:21:36.807
<v Speaker 3>saying at the moment is that we would rather put

0:21:37.487 --> 0:21:42.007
<v Speaker 3>a white, eighty one year old man who can't string

0:21:42.047 --> 0:21:45.127
<v Speaker 3>a sentence together and mixes up names and is very

0:21:45.207 --> 0:21:50.527
<v Speaker 3>uninspiring and every press conference before we would risk a

0:21:50.567 --> 0:21:52.007
<v Speaker 3>woman of color. And I know that a lot of

0:21:52.007 --> 0:21:53.807
<v Speaker 3>people have a lot of analysis of Kamala, but I

0:21:53.847 --> 0:21:56.327
<v Speaker 3>don't think that you can unpick but those two things.

0:21:56.687 --> 0:22:00.127
<v Speaker 7>No one's saying that except Joe Biden. He's literally he's

0:22:00.167 --> 0:22:03.727
<v Speaker 7>holding his fire party and could be argued the country

0:22:03.727 --> 0:22:07.127
<v Speaker 7>hostage because no one thinks that like nobody, there is

0:22:07.247 --> 0:22:10.647
<v Speaker 7>nobody who is saying that he's a better chance than her,

0:22:10.807 --> 0:22:12.287
<v Speaker 7>nobody within the Democratic Party.

0:22:12.407 --> 0:22:14.047
<v Speaker 4>That's why it's so fastical.

0:22:13.807 --> 0:22:16.247
<v Speaker 7>Now in terms of how it's changed what happened on

0:22:16.287 --> 0:22:19.127
<v Speaker 7>Sunday in the attempt at assassination. It's good news and bad

0:22:19.167 --> 0:22:22.447
<v Speaker 7>news for Biden. The good news for him personally is

0:22:22.487 --> 0:22:25.687
<v Speaker 7>that it's changed the focus from him needing to step aside,

0:22:25.767 --> 0:22:28.167
<v Speaker 7>and all he's trying to do is slow walk this

0:22:28.567 --> 0:22:31.407
<v Speaker 7>and delay, delay, delay, until it becomes sort of too

0:22:31.527 --> 0:22:34.927
<v Speaker 7>late to change candidates. So this has been very effective

0:22:34.967 --> 0:22:38.367
<v Speaker 7>for that because it would seem to be unseemly. For example,

0:22:38.447 --> 0:22:41.727
<v Speaker 7>imagine if George Clooney's op ed came out tomorrow or

0:22:41.727 --> 0:22:43.607
<v Speaker 7>the next day, or even at the end of this week.

0:22:44.047 --> 0:22:46.927
<v Speaker 7>So all of that has been put on hold. And

0:22:46.967 --> 0:22:51.327
<v Speaker 7>also it's given him the chance to present as a stately, reassuring,

0:22:52.207 --> 0:22:55.047
<v Speaker 7>calming figure like whenever there's any kind of unrest. It

0:22:55.327 --> 0:22:58.167
<v Speaker 7>is very good for incumbent prime ministers and presidents because

0:22:58.207 --> 0:23:00.847
<v Speaker 7>everyone freaked out and they just want to be calmed.

0:23:00.927 --> 0:23:02.927
<v Speaker 3>But then he said, like he said in the first

0:23:02.927 --> 0:23:05.927
<v Speaker 3>press conference, this is unheard of, and I thought this

0:23:05.967 --> 0:23:08.887
<v Speaker 3>has happened in your lifetime. Joe Biden. You have seen

0:23:09.447 --> 0:23:12.887
<v Speaker 3>one president JFK be assassinated. You've seen Ronald Reagan with

0:23:12.887 --> 0:23:18.807
<v Speaker 3>an attempted assassination like not the right language, but on Trump,

0:23:18.927 --> 0:23:21.087
<v Speaker 3>I just kept thinking that there are a few things.

0:23:21.247 --> 0:23:23.367
<v Speaker 3>If you've been to the US, something that will strike

0:23:23.447 --> 0:23:28.567
<v Speaker 3>you as very different to Australia is the incredible outward

0:23:28.647 --> 0:23:32.847
<v Speaker 3>display of respect for war veterans everywhere at a sporting match.

0:23:33.487 --> 0:23:35.127
<v Speaker 3>If you have put your body on the line for

0:23:35.207 --> 0:23:38.047
<v Speaker 3>your country. There is little that Americans respect more than that.

0:23:39.047 --> 0:23:41.207
<v Speaker 3>And that is how Trump will now be seen as

0:23:41.247 --> 0:23:43.607
<v Speaker 3>a man who nearly lost his life, as a hero

0:23:43.687 --> 0:23:47.607
<v Speaker 3>who nearly lost his life while fighting for America, and

0:23:47.687 --> 0:23:50.047
<v Speaker 3>that is going to have an enormous impact on the

0:23:50.047 --> 0:24:03.807
<v Speaker 3>rest of this campaign.

0:24:06.727 --> 0:24:09.087
<v Speaker 4>Katy Perry has released the first single from her new

0:24:09.487 --> 0:24:12.487
<v Speaker 4>and it's an anthem about feminism that's made a lot

0:24:12.527 --> 0:24:17.447
<v Speaker 4>of people mad. Here is the song, and we're lucky

0:24:17.607 --> 0:24:25.527
<v Speaker 4>to believe it, Goddy wamb It's pretty catchy.

0:24:26.287 --> 0:24:28.487
<v Speaker 7>You'll be singing that in your head, I guarantee for

0:24:28.527 --> 0:24:30.447
<v Speaker 7>the next few days. But it is the video, not

0:24:30.527 --> 0:24:33.007
<v Speaker 7>the song so much that everyone's talking about.

0:24:33.167 --> 0:24:35.727
<v Speaker 3>I also have some thoughts about the song. Back continue yeah,

0:24:36.447 --> 0:24:37.327
<v Speaker 3>look it was.

0:24:37.847 --> 0:24:41.527
<v Speaker 7>The video was roundly slammed across the internet after it

0:24:41.607 --> 0:24:45.007
<v Speaker 7>dropped on the weekend for being a really cynical use

0:24:45.007 --> 0:24:48.207
<v Speaker 7>of empty feminism to get attention and sell music at

0:24:48.287 --> 0:24:51.247
<v Speaker 7>the expense of women. And there are two main reasons

0:24:51.287 --> 0:24:54.087
<v Speaker 7>for this, which I'm going to unpack to describe the

0:24:54.327 --> 0:24:58.727
<v Speaker 7>video itself. It starts with, you know, the very famous

0:24:58.807 --> 0:25:02.887
<v Speaker 7>image in feminism of Rosy the Riveter. It's the illustration

0:25:03.007 --> 0:25:05.567
<v Speaker 7>of the woman with the red bandana in her hair

0:25:05.847 --> 0:25:08.967
<v Speaker 7>and a work shirt and she's got her bicep, and

0:25:09.367 --> 0:25:12.447
<v Speaker 7>it shows Katie dressed like a sexy version of her

0:25:13.167 --> 0:25:16.007
<v Speaker 7>on a building site with a whole lot of other

0:25:16.047 --> 0:25:20.767
<v Speaker 7>sexy construction workers in teeny tiny hot pants and bikini tops.

0:25:20.487 --> 0:25:24.847
<v Speaker 2>Really see every day on the street, yeah, work boots.

0:25:25.247 --> 0:25:27.767
<v Speaker 7>Yes, So they sort of dance for a while and

0:25:27.807 --> 0:25:30.447
<v Speaker 7>she's got this bikini top on that's in stars and stripes,

0:25:30.727 --> 0:25:33.647
<v Speaker 7>and then an anvil comes from the sky like kind

0:25:33.647 --> 0:25:35.967
<v Speaker 7>of in a road run a cartoon. It sort of

0:25:36.007 --> 0:25:39.127
<v Speaker 7>squashes Katie Perry, and it's like, this is the reset,

0:25:39.207 --> 0:25:40.207
<v Speaker 7>and so it's going to be.

0:25:40.087 --> 0:25:41.847
<v Speaker 4>Like, well, what's the world like after it?

0:25:41.927 --> 0:25:42.087
<v Speaker 3>Oh?

0:25:42.167 --> 0:25:44.967
<v Speaker 4>Okay, So it was tongue in cheek sati hah.

0:25:45.127 --> 0:25:47.567
<v Speaker 7>But then the world afterwards is kind of just the same.

0:25:48.567 --> 0:25:52.047
<v Speaker 7>But like you know, sexy women including Katy Perry, like

0:25:52.087 --> 0:25:55.687
<v Speaker 7>in bikini and dressed like a biomechanical.

0:25:55.007 --> 0:25:57.767
<v Speaker 4>Horse that sex toys, that was driving.

0:25:58.167 --> 0:26:00.247
<v Speaker 2>They were sex toys. They were agues.

0:26:01.007 --> 0:26:04.527
<v Speaker 7>So the two main criticisms that she's using this empty

0:26:04.607 --> 0:26:07.607
<v Speaker 7>feminism in this cynical weight attempt to get attention.

0:26:08.287 --> 0:26:10.247
<v Speaker 4>The first is that the sthetic of the video is.

0:26:10.327 --> 0:26:12.487
<v Speaker 7>Very much focused literally on the tits and ass of

0:26:12.567 --> 0:26:15.167
<v Speaker 7>Katie Perry and the other women in the video, and

0:26:15.247 --> 0:26:18.247
<v Speaker 7>she says that that's ironic because they are making fun

0:26:18.287 --> 0:26:21.927
<v Speaker 7>of the male gaze while weirdly playing up to the

0:26:21.927 --> 0:26:25.247
<v Speaker 7>male gaze though. And the second thing is that the

0:26:25.407 --> 0:26:28.127
<v Speaker 7>song was co produced and co written by doctor Luke,

0:26:28.207 --> 0:26:30.767
<v Speaker 7>and he is a hit maker for a music producer

0:26:30.807 --> 0:26:34.807
<v Speaker 7>who was accused of sexual assault by his former protege Kesha,

0:26:35.207 --> 0:26:38.687
<v Speaker 7>which he denied, and Kesh's lawsuit claimed that doctor Luke

0:26:38.727 --> 0:26:41.927
<v Speaker 7>drugged and raped her on two occasions, made threats against

0:26:41.967 --> 0:26:45.367
<v Speaker 7>her and her family, and called her derogatory names. She

0:26:45.407 --> 0:26:47.607
<v Speaker 7>also said this the way he spoke about her trigger

0:26:47.647 --> 0:26:48.527
<v Speaker 7>and eating disorder.

0:26:48.967 --> 0:26:49.487
<v Speaker 4>The case was.

0:26:49.487 --> 0:26:52.367
<v Speaker 7>Eventually settled with no conviction or admission of guilt on

0:26:52.407 --> 0:26:54.647
<v Speaker 7>his part. But Katie Perry's decision to work with him

0:26:54.687 --> 0:26:58.127
<v Speaker 7>on this song about female empowerment, which he co wrote

0:26:58.487 --> 0:27:02.727
<v Speaker 7>and produced, is an interesting one, and she obviously predicted

0:27:02.767 --> 0:27:05.407
<v Speaker 7>the blowback about this because yesterday she released a defense

0:27:05.487 --> 0:27:08.247
<v Speaker 7>of the video as being satire that was actually taken

0:27:08.727 --> 0:27:11.247
<v Speaker 7>on set while the video itself was being filmed.

0:27:11.247 --> 0:27:14.127
<v Speaker 4>Here's what she had to say, girl Boss, shit, you

0:27:14.207 --> 0:27:19.127
<v Speaker 4>can do it. You go girl, you were born to shine, and.

0:27:19.047 --> 0:27:23.167
<v Speaker 5>We're kind of just having fun being a bit sarcastic

0:27:23.247 --> 0:27:27.567
<v Speaker 5>with it. It's very slapstick, very on the nose, and

0:27:27.647 --> 0:27:31.967
<v Speaker 5>with this set, it's like, oh, we're not about the malegates,

0:27:32.007 --> 0:27:34.767
<v Speaker 5>but we really are about the male gaze, and we're

0:27:34.767 --> 0:27:37.727
<v Speaker 5>really overplaying it and on the nose because I'm about

0:27:37.767 --> 0:27:41.527
<v Speaker 5>to get smashed, which is like a reset, a reset

0:27:41.687 --> 0:27:47.567
<v Speaker 5>for me and a reset from my idea of feminine divine.

0:27:47.727 --> 0:27:51.967
<v Speaker 5>And it's a whole different world we go to after.

0:27:51.687 --> 0:27:54.367
<v Speaker 7>This, except it's not really just a few sort of

0:27:54.527 --> 0:27:59.287
<v Speaker 7>comments that are indicative from out louders and others. So

0:27:59.367 --> 0:28:02.087
<v Speaker 7>you're dressed like every male fantasy. How is this empowering

0:28:02.127 --> 0:28:04.287
<v Speaker 7>for women. You're saying, as a woman, you need to

0:28:04.287 --> 0:28:06.087
<v Speaker 7>have a good body and show all your skin to

0:28:06.087 --> 0:28:08.567
<v Speaker 7>be strong. This is so nineties. What about image for

0:28:08.607 --> 0:28:11.007
<v Speaker 7>young girls everyone where? Don't you have a daughter? Is

0:28:11.047 --> 0:28:13.807
<v Speaker 7>this what you aspire her to be? Someone else said

0:28:13.847 --> 0:28:17.567
<v Speaker 7>a woman's empowerment song produced by doctor Luke call Alanis Morissette.

0:28:17.567 --> 0:28:21.007
<v Speaker 7>Because this shit is ironic, and then someone else saying

0:28:21.247 --> 0:28:24.287
<v Speaker 7>is supposed to make us feel empowered. Nothing says female

0:28:24.327 --> 0:28:27.327
<v Speaker 7>empowerment like holding a bedazzle drill. This is the most

0:28:27.367 --> 0:28:30.247
<v Speaker 7>surface level fake feminist shit I've seen in a long time.

0:28:30.327 --> 0:28:32.447
<v Speaker 2>One of my favorite comments on that post was, for

0:28:32.487 --> 0:28:35.047
<v Speaker 2>God's sake, you haven't even put the drill bits in correctly.

0:28:37.487 --> 0:28:40.407
<v Speaker 7>Jesse, How did you feel when I sent the video

0:28:40.527 --> 0:28:41.527
<v Speaker 7>to you over the weekend.

0:28:42.047 --> 0:28:45.527
<v Speaker 3>I don't get it. I keep watching it over and

0:28:45.567 --> 0:28:46.807
<v Speaker 3>over again. Then I was like, I need to know

0:28:46.847 --> 0:28:49.087
<v Speaker 3>who wrote this, because I believe chat GPT wrote this.

0:28:49.127 --> 0:28:52.447
<v Speaker 3>It's like you put in the video Feminist add them

0:28:52.567 --> 0:28:53.367
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty four.

0:28:53.407 --> 0:28:56.887
<v Speaker 7>Well, doctor Luke, who was accused of sexual assault, wrote this, but.

0:28:57.127 --> 0:29:01.247
<v Speaker 3>It was so incoherent and bizarre that I was like

0:29:01.327 --> 0:29:03.087
<v Speaker 3>it it looks like a I has done this, But

0:29:03.127 --> 0:29:05.007
<v Speaker 3>then I looked at the six riders, four of which

0:29:05.007 --> 0:29:07.447
<v Speaker 3>a men, which is and the fact it took six

0:29:07.567 --> 0:29:10.287
<v Speaker 3>riders is kind of saying a lot. But even the

0:29:10.367 --> 0:29:13.367
<v Speaker 3>lyrics right are like it's a woman's world, which is

0:29:13.767 --> 0:29:17.967
<v Speaker 3>a meaningless statement. And in a US context when abortion

0:29:18.047 --> 0:29:20.127
<v Speaker 3>laws are being wound back, I think we probably require

0:29:20.167 --> 0:29:21.807
<v Speaker 3>something point here if we're going to be doing a

0:29:21.807 --> 0:29:25.847
<v Speaker 3>feminist anthem, it's being an activist without wanting to upset

0:29:25.887 --> 0:29:30.447
<v Speaker 3>anyone and say anything remotely controversial. And then she says

0:29:30.727 --> 0:29:34.607
<v Speaker 3>we ain't going away, and it's like where would women go?

0:29:35.087 --> 0:29:38.967
<v Speaker 3>Like women are here, therefore feminism they'refore tits Like I

0:29:39.007 --> 0:29:43.847
<v Speaker 3>don't understand. Also, yeah, what point we're making? So I've

0:29:43.847 --> 0:29:47.367
<v Speaker 3>rewatched it like one hundred times, and what I am

0:29:47.447 --> 0:29:51.447
<v Speaker 3>understanding is that feminism is an aesthetic I think, which

0:29:51.487 --> 0:29:55.727
<v Speaker 3>is rosy the riveter, but also in a way it's

0:29:55.847 --> 0:29:59.887
<v Speaker 3>perfect because it is an accurate reflection of the mess

0:29:59.927 --> 0:30:02.127
<v Speaker 3>that is the current state of feminism. It is a

0:30:02.127 --> 0:30:04.727
<v Speaker 3>woman with boobs and a male gaze, holding a vibrator

0:30:04.807 --> 0:30:08.407
<v Speaker 3>and a tool belt and trying to say, Jesse, is

0:30:08.407 --> 0:30:10.407
<v Speaker 3>there something wrong with because I think she kind of

0:30:10.407 --> 0:30:12.127
<v Speaker 3>loves that this is where feminism is at.

0:30:11.967 --> 0:30:14.007
<v Speaker 2>Because I think when she said that bit about it's

0:30:14.007 --> 0:30:16.007
<v Speaker 2>not about the malgaze, but it is about the malgaze

0:30:16.087 --> 0:30:19.047
<v Speaker 2>is what we often talk about when you're on Instagram

0:30:19.087 --> 0:30:21.447
<v Speaker 2>or whatever and there's a picture of somebody saying blah

0:30:21.447 --> 0:30:23.807
<v Speaker 2>blah empowerment, but they're in their bikini with their bum.

0:30:23.967 --> 0:30:25.007
<v Speaker 2>That's what she's talking.

0:30:24.807 --> 0:30:27.007
<v Speaker 3>About, right, Is she critiquing that or I.

0:30:26.927 --> 0:30:29.287
<v Speaker 2>Think she's critiquing that. I think that's what she thinks

0:30:29.327 --> 0:30:29.847
<v Speaker 2>she's doing.

0:30:30.207 --> 0:30:32.727
<v Speaker 4>But it's not critique if you're part of it, like

0:30:32.887 --> 0:30:33.807
<v Speaker 4>law is it? To me?

0:30:33.927 --> 0:30:35.887
<v Speaker 7>It's like, you know when people they do it less

0:30:35.887 --> 0:30:37.807
<v Speaker 7>now because they get called out, But you know when

0:30:37.807 --> 0:30:41.287
<v Speaker 7>people post us a thirsty photo of like themselves in

0:30:41.287 --> 0:30:44.767
<v Speaker 7>a bikini from behind with their bum and it's like

0:30:45.487 --> 0:30:49.127
<v Speaker 7>just appreciating the beautiful sunset and tranquility and.

0:30:49.087 --> 0:30:51.367
<v Speaker 4>Feel so grateful for this holiday I've been able to.

0:30:51.447 --> 0:30:53.087
<v Speaker 7>It's like, you just want us to look at your bum,

0:30:53.167 --> 0:30:54.967
<v Speaker 7>which is fine, but you don't have to dress it

0:30:55.087 --> 0:30:58.727
<v Speaker 7>up in some message of empowerment or inspiration.

0:30:59.007 --> 0:31:00.567
<v Speaker 4>But you're just being thirsty.

0:31:00.607 --> 0:31:04.127
<v Speaker 7>Because we all live in a world where being validated

0:31:04.167 --> 0:31:05.687
<v Speaker 7>for looking hot is power.

0:31:05.927 --> 0:31:09.087
<v Speaker 2>Here's my question about Katie Perry. Right, she was one.

0:31:09.247 --> 0:31:12.807
<v Speaker 2>It's enormous, right If you think about it, you think

0:31:12.807 --> 0:31:15.447
<v Speaker 2>about kiss the Girl, obviously, but then you think about raw,

0:31:15.487 --> 0:31:18.687
<v Speaker 2>you think about firework, you think about Last Friday Night,

0:31:18.727 --> 0:31:21.287
<v Speaker 2>and all those that are so ingrained in our culture

0:31:21.327 --> 0:31:23.607
<v Speaker 2>that we could all sing them at any time. She

0:31:23.767 --> 0:31:27.287
<v Speaker 2>was a massive, massive deal. She was multi platinum selling.

0:31:27.567 --> 0:31:29.967
<v Speaker 2>She sold all the rights to her music last year

0:31:30.047 --> 0:31:33.167
<v Speaker 2>for two hundred and twenty five million dollars or something. Right, So,

0:31:33.847 --> 0:31:37.647
<v Speaker 2>Katy Perry was a big deal. Now she hasn't really

0:31:37.687 --> 0:31:39.887
<v Speaker 2>been a big deal for pretty much a decade. She's

0:31:39.887 --> 0:31:42.087
<v Speaker 2>been releasing music, but it's not really cutting through in

0:31:42.127 --> 0:31:45.247
<v Speaker 2>the same way. She is now thirty nine, she has

0:31:45.287 --> 0:31:50.247
<v Speaker 2>had a kid. She is very much coming back with

0:31:50.367 --> 0:31:53.207
<v Speaker 2>this album as the same Katy Perry as before. Because

0:31:53.527 --> 0:31:55.327
<v Speaker 2>one of the things to note about this is it's

0:31:55.327 --> 0:31:57.447
<v Speaker 2>not like Katie Perry wasn't playing with this kind of

0:31:57.447 --> 0:32:00.767
<v Speaker 2>imagery before. She definitely was, Like who could forget the

0:32:00.887 --> 0:32:03.007
<v Speaker 2>shooting whipped cream out of your boobs and all that

0:32:03.047 --> 0:32:06.127
<v Speaker 2>kind of stuff and all the suggestive lollipop licking and things.

0:32:06.807 --> 0:32:08.647
<v Speaker 2>What do you do if you're her, right, what do

0:32:08.727 --> 0:32:12.207
<v Speaker 2>you do if you are a female pop star and

0:32:12.327 --> 0:32:14.967
<v Speaker 2>we know how age is that industry is? We know

0:32:15.047 --> 0:32:17.447
<v Speaker 2>that every five minutes there's a Sabrina Carpenter, or there's

0:32:17.487 --> 0:32:21.127
<v Speaker 2>a Camilla Cabello, or there's a Charlie XCX. Pop music

0:32:21.247 --> 0:32:24.007
<v Speaker 2>is obsessed with young, more dominated by women than it's

0:32:24.047 --> 0:32:26.007
<v Speaker 2>ever been at any other time in history, which is great,

0:32:26.047 --> 0:32:29.927
<v Speaker 2>but still mostly young, with a few like elder outliers,

0:32:29.927 --> 0:32:31.927
<v Speaker 2>and I guess we could probably call Taylor Swift an

0:32:31.927 --> 0:32:35.847
<v Speaker 2>elder these station a mid thirties. What are you supposed

0:32:35.887 --> 0:32:38.967
<v Speaker 2>to do? Like, how does Katie Perry play that game?

0:32:39.047 --> 0:32:41.007
<v Speaker 2>Because I saw a lot of comments on this going

0:32:41.487 --> 0:32:45.087
<v Speaker 2>so sad. Is she having a midlife crisis? Isn't she

0:32:45.167 --> 0:32:45.887
<v Speaker 2>too old for this?

0:32:45.967 --> 0:32:46.127
<v Speaker 1>Now?

0:32:46.287 --> 0:32:49.287
<v Speaker 2>Da da da da da? What does a Katie Perry do?

0:32:49.927 --> 0:32:52.647
<v Speaker 7>I don't think it's the getting a gear off that

0:32:52.807 --> 0:32:55.727
<v Speaker 7>is particularly surprising, because I mean, Beyonce was naked on

0:32:55.727 --> 0:32:58.727
<v Speaker 7>a horse, and apart from me, everyone seemed to be

0:32:58.767 --> 0:33:02.327
<v Speaker 7>cool with that. Right, It's not the getting the gear off,

0:33:02.407 --> 0:33:04.767
<v Speaker 7>it's getting the gear off and saying you're doing it

0:33:04.767 --> 0:33:08.327
<v Speaker 7>in the service of feminism and empowerment. When actually, you've

0:33:08.367 --> 0:33:11.687
<v Speaker 7>just had quite the body transformation, and you want to

0:33:11.727 --> 0:33:13.847
<v Speaker 7>stay relevant, and the way to stay relevant in our

0:33:13.887 --> 0:33:16.967
<v Speaker 7>culture is to be considered hot.

0:33:17.127 --> 0:33:20.127
<v Speaker 4>But the beauty that oppress all of us.

0:33:20.167 --> 0:33:22.687
<v Speaker 3>And she's gone back to doctor Luke, and as well

0:33:22.727 --> 0:33:25.327
<v Speaker 3>as obviously what you said about kesher, he is sort

0:33:25.367 --> 0:33:27.247
<v Speaker 3>of who was with her when her career launched, right,

0:33:27.287 --> 0:33:29.687
<v Speaker 3>and then she separated herself from him. So that signals

0:33:29.727 --> 0:33:31.687
<v Speaker 3>to me, I want to go back to ten years

0:33:31.687 --> 0:33:33.847
<v Speaker 3>ago Katie Perry, when I made Bangers, when I made

0:33:33.887 --> 0:33:38.847
<v Speaker 3>absolute bangers. What Katie Perry probably isn't nailing is evolution.

0:33:39.607 --> 0:33:43.447
<v Speaker 3>And this looked like a single that could have been

0:33:43.527 --> 0:33:47.127
<v Speaker 3>on the same album maybe as Firework and Raw and

0:33:47.407 --> 0:33:51.327
<v Speaker 3>all of those, and the music industry and the culture

0:33:51.487 --> 0:33:55.567
<v Speaker 3>has evolved enormously, and even her look is almost exactly

0:33:55.687 --> 0:33:58.407
<v Speaker 3>the same. And she said, I think it's it used

0:33:58.407 --> 0:34:02.127
<v Speaker 3>to be. In her Twitter bio it said artist activist conscious,

0:34:02.447 --> 0:34:05.007
<v Speaker 3>and she's decided that she's going to do purposeful pop.

0:34:05.327 --> 0:34:07.367
<v Speaker 3>And to me, since she decided that.

0:34:07.647 --> 0:34:10.047
<v Speaker 7>But that's just also not true, like you can call

0:34:10.087 --> 0:34:12.487
<v Speaker 7>it purposeful pop. The only song and I agree she's

0:34:12.487 --> 0:34:14.727
<v Speaker 7>had bangers like Firework and all of those things, the

0:34:14.767 --> 0:34:18.007
<v Speaker 7>only one that was even mildly purposeful or transgressive was

0:34:18.047 --> 0:34:20.767
<v Speaker 7>I kissed a Girl and I liked it. And we've

0:34:20.807 --> 0:34:23.727
<v Speaker 7>sort of seen not really any evidence that she actually

0:34:23.767 --> 0:34:25.607
<v Speaker 7>ever was queer. Maybe she was, Maybe she was, and

0:34:25.727 --> 0:34:27.927
<v Speaker 7>that's not really any of our business. But that's the

0:34:28.167 --> 0:34:31.887
<v Speaker 7>only thing that she's done back then, I kiss a

0:34:31.927 --> 0:34:34.087
<v Speaker 7>Girl and I liked it. That's in any way transgressive

0:34:34.287 --> 0:34:37.807
<v Speaker 7>or purposeful or kind of empowering.

0:34:38.007 --> 0:34:42.007
<v Speaker 3>What that song did was ingratiate her with the LGBT

0:34:42.127 --> 0:34:45.687
<v Speaker 3>community who have really like followed her entire career, and

0:34:45.727 --> 0:34:48.687
<v Speaker 3>there's a theory that this was a real and you

0:34:48.727 --> 0:34:53.287
<v Speaker 3>can see that there's a lot of kind of LGBT.

0:34:53.487 --> 0:34:55.647
<v Speaker 7>That's what Again, it feels really tokenistic, like there's just

0:34:55.687 --> 0:34:59.847
<v Speaker 7>inexplicably a cutaway shot of two guys kissing. That doesn't

0:35:00.007 --> 0:35:02.567
<v Speaker 7>I mean, Madonna did that many many decades ago in

0:35:02.567 --> 0:35:05.927
<v Speaker 7>a way that felt authentic. People know when they're being manipulated,

0:35:05.967 --> 0:35:06.727
<v Speaker 7>they get it.

0:35:07.207 --> 0:35:12.407
<v Speaker 3>And we always been manipulated by pops. We are it is.

0:35:12.647 --> 0:35:15.367
<v Speaker 4>That's just not a sophisticated enough for tim. I quite

0:35:15.527 --> 0:35:18.127
<v Speaker 4>like the video. It's an overach do.

0:35:18.607 --> 0:35:21.087
<v Speaker 2>I watched it several times because I'm like my candy,

0:35:21.127 --> 0:35:23.447
<v Speaker 2>it's fun, like I like, it's fun right, pretty colors.

0:35:23.447 --> 0:35:26.727
<v Speaker 2>I cannot forgive the doctor luke bit. I just think

0:35:26.767 --> 0:35:29.767
<v Speaker 2>that that is the biggest mistake, is that she's talking

0:35:29.767 --> 0:35:32.287
<v Speaker 2>a lot about the feminine, divine and all that. Then

0:35:32.367 --> 0:35:34.647
<v Speaker 2>work with an all female team, do something like that

0:35:34.647 --> 0:35:36.207
<v Speaker 2>that would be more interesting, but.

0:35:36.327 --> 0:35:39.807
<v Speaker 4>Have four men, right, you know what?

0:35:39.927 --> 0:35:43.127
<v Speaker 2>It feels like a little bit because in that clip

0:35:43.127 --> 0:35:45.327
<v Speaker 2>that you played before me or where she's talking about

0:35:45.327 --> 0:35:49.127
<v Speaker 2>how it's satire in her mind, I think she's trying

0:35:49.207 --> 0:35:52.767
<v Speaker 2>to be like that ironic gen Z thing of like

0:35:52.887 --> 0:35:55.927
<v Speaker 2>girl bossing, you know how it's like been a bit reclaimed,

0:35:55.967 --> 0:35:57.927
<v Speaker 2>you know how, like Emily Verner, my our friend and

0:35:58.607 --> 0:36:01.407
<v Speaker 2>co host on the pod, will like post pictures of

0:36:01.447 --> 0:36:03.887
<v Speaker 2>herself on a big workday going girl bossing, and it's

0:36:03.927 --> 0:36:05.967
<v Speaker 2>kind of like slightly ironic because we all know that

0:36:06.007 --> 0:36:08.967
<v Speaker 2>girls feminism is on the nose and it's gone, but

0:36:09.287 --> 0:36:12.087
<v Speaker 2>they're like claiming it back. And I think she's trying

0:36:12.127 --> 0:36:15.487
<v Speaker 2>to do all those things, but it just somehow feels

0:36:16.167 --> 0:36:20.087
<v Speaker 2>cheesy off because the proof of this will be in

0:36:20.407 --> 0:36:21.287
<v Speaker 2>is it going to be a hit?

0:36:21.407 --> 0:36:21.807
<v Speaker 4>This song?

0:36:21.967 --> 0:36:24.687
<v Speaker 3>And I feel like it might be even more derivative

0:36:24.927 --> 0:36:28.687
<v Speaker 3>the girl Boss thing. But this feels like Barbie. It's

0:36:28.727 --> 0:36:31.887
<v Speaker 3>looked at the success of Barbie and gone, we can

0:36:32.167 --> 0:36:35.967
<v Speaker 3>use a Barbie doll as a signal of empowerment. And

0:36:36.007 --> 0:36:39.767
<v Speaker 3>the song almost feels like a chat GPT rendition of.

0:36:39.807 --> 0:36:43.767
<v Speaker 2>The Barbie message We're all the President's girl, Yeah yeah,

0:36:43.887 --> 0:36:45.927
<v Speaker 2>and the thing about how hard our lives are and

0:36:45.927 --> 0:36:46.607
<v Speaker 2>blah blah blah.

0:36:46.647 --> 0:36:48.447
<v Speaker 3>It feels like she's taken that and gone, Okay, this

0:36:48.487 --> 0:36:51.887
<v Speaker 3>is a cultural moment. I'm going to try and go

0:36:51.967 --> 0:36:55.527
<v Speaker 3>with that, But it doesn't have the same depth or

0:36:55.727 --> 0:36:57.367
<v Speaker 3>grit to it. It hasn't landed.

0:36:57.407 --> 0:36:59.207
<v Speaker 7>I agree, and I think, look, I'm just going to

0:36:59.247 --> 0:37:02.247
<v Speaker 7>say the quiet part out loud. Her body looks very

0:37:02.247 --> 0:37:04.487
<v Speaker 7>different to the way that it used to, and I

0:37:04.487 --> 0:37:08.327
<v Speaker 7>think she's really feeling a lot of validation based on

0:37:08.407 --> 0:37:11.087
<v Speaker 7>how her body looks like. We saw some photos of

0:37:11.127 --> 0:37:13.807
<v Speaker 7>her appearing at fashion Week last week or the week before,

0:37:14.287 --> 0:37:17.407
<v Speaker 7>and she was wearing some panty hose or some tights

0:37:17.447 --> 0:37:20.847
<v Speaker 7>that were all ladded nothing and an open, full length

0:37:20.927 --> 0:37:24.887
<v Speaker 7>like fur coat. Now, Katie Perry, I would challenge you

0:37:24.927 --> 0:37:27.207
<v Speaker 7>a little bit on the fact that she's always done

0:37:27.247 --> 0:37:29.047
<v Speaker 7>like the whipped cream out of the bra and stuff,

0:37:29.087 --> 0:37:31.967
<v Speaker 7>but in a very kind of fun way, Like remember

0:37:32.007 --> 0:37:34.767
<v Speaker 7>she would go to the met gala dress like a Hamburger,

0:37:35.447 --> 0:37:39.847
<v Speaker 7>or like she was very much in dress, very ott,

0:37:40.207 --> 0:37:43.647
<v Speaker 7>but not as body con and not as body revealing

0:37:44.127 --> 0:37:47.127
<v Speaker 7>as she has been in this new iteration of herself

0:37:47.447 --> 0:37:51.047
<v Speaker 7>where her body does look very, very different. And again

0:37:51.167 --> 0:37:53.927
<v Speaker 7>she's part of the game that we all are forced

0:37:53.967 --> 0:37:56.767
<v Speaker 7>to play in terms of beauty standards and what is

0:37:56.807 --> 0:37:59.887
<v Speaker 7>rewarded in our culture. But I think where people are

0:37:59.887 --> 0:38:03.207
<v Speaker 7>getting their hackles up is that she is exploiting that

0:38:04.247 --> 0:38:08.807
<v Speaker 7>and pretending that it's for every woman when it's actually.

0:38:08.527 --> 0:38:09.687
<v Speaker 4>Just for her.

0:38:10.767 --> 0:38:14.487
<v Speaker 7>One thing that it's important to note is the like

0:38:14.567 --> 0:38:19.207
<v Speaker 7>the glee with which people leap on this in some places,

0:38:19.327 --> 0:38:24.327
<v Speaker 7>and how it descends into it like really disparaging, misogynistic,

0:38:25.247 --> 0:38:29.167
<v Speaker 7>nasty commentary about her personally instead of recognizing that, as

0:38:29.207 --> 0:38:32.367
<v Speaker 7>you said whole, it's really hard to reinvent yourself and

0:38:32.407 --> 0:38:36.047
<v Speaker 7>be a woman in the entertainment industry at any age,

0:38:36.087 --> 0:38:39.007
<v Speaker 7>but particularly as you hit forty and beyond.

0:38:39.207 --> 0:38:42.327
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and I agree with the criticism, and obviously this

0:38:42.407 --> 0:38:44.847
<v Speaker 3>is an album it'd warrants review, the culture is going

0:38:44.887 --> 0:38:47.247
<v Speaker 3>to be talking about it. But I read one that

0:38:47.367 --> 0:38:50.807
<v Speaker 3>was kind of mocking her for being an American Idol judge,

0:38:50.847 --> 0:38:52.767
<v Speaker 3>which I thought was kind of a low blow. And

0:38:53.007 --> 0:38:55.367
<v Speaker 3>she's a new mum, and she's Orlando Bloom's wife, and

0:38:55.807 --> 0:38:58.527
<v Speaker 3>the tone which was applied to it, I just sort

0:38:58.567 --> 0:39:01.447
<v Speaker 3>of went, do we talk about men in the same

0:39:01.487 --> 0:39:03.847
<v Speaker 3>way or is this a little bit of fun that

0:39:03.887 --> 0:39:06.767
<v Speaker 3>we have with a thirty nine year old woman who

0:39:06.847 --> 0:39:10.407
<v Speaker 3>is clearly trying exactly there are men? Yeah, Like I

0:39:10.447 --> 0:39:14.567
<v Speaker 3>reckon that there's been more written about Katy Perry's attempt to,

0:39:14.847 --> 0:39:17.927
<v Speaker 3>you know, I don't know, make feminism sexy than there

0:39:17.967 --> 0:39:21.007
<v Speaker 3>has been about doctor Luke. Like doctor Luke is he

0:39:21.007 --> 0:39:21.967
<v Speaker 3>gets the odd article?

0:39:22.087 --> 0:39:23.967
<v Speaker 7>Oh no, there was a lot written about him at

0:39:23.967 --> 0:39:26.927
<v Speaker 7>the time. There honestly was. That's why people are so surprised.

0:39:26.967 --> 0:39:29.407
<v Speaker 7>It's not like that was a small story that flew. No.

0:39:29.687 --> 0:39:31.527
<v Speaker 3>But I think that men who do much worse. This

0:39:31.607 --> 0:39:33.487
<v Speaker 3>is a career misstep. This isn't a crime.

0:39:33.647 --> 0:39:35.807
<v Speaker 4>Oh yeah, of course. I don't think anyone's prosecuted. You

0:39:35.847 --> 0:39:37.967
<v Speaker 4>just need to go to prison, let's be clear.

0:39:38.607 --> 0:39:41.407
<v Speaker 7>But I think it's really just reflective of that disconnect

0:39:41.727 --> 0:39:45.087
<v Speaker 7>between how people are smarter than that, Like, you can't

0:39:45.087 --> 0:39:47.607
<v Speaker 7>just feed people one thing and call it another and

0:39:47.687 --> 0:39:51.167
<v Speaker 7>expect them to buy it. So I hate the term

0:39:51.287 --> 0:39:54.007
<v Speaker 7>calling out, but I think people are just drawing attention

0:39:54.127 --> 0:39:56.967
<v Speaker 7>to the contradiction here, and even though she's trying to

0:39:56.967 --> 0:39:58.727
<v Speaker 7>own it and say it's satire.

0:39:59.327 --> 0:40:01.647
<v Speaker 4>Oh, it's a little bit tricky.

0:40:01.847 --> 0:40:04.647
<v Speaker 3>Clara and I actually did an episode on Canceled recently

0:40:04.687 --> 0:40:07.767
<v Speaker 3>about Katy Perry about her She's got like a weird

0:40:07.807 --> 0:40:10.087
<v Speaker 3>feud with Taylor Swift that happened for a few years,

0:40:10.247 --> 0:40:13.447
<v Speaker 3>this awkward transition to purposeful pop that we've touched on,

0:40:13.847 --> 0:40:16.327
<v Speaker 3>the regrets about her early music. She has said that

0:40:16.367 --> 0:40:18.207
<v Speaker 3>she would phrase I kissed a girl very.

0:40:18.087 --> 0:40:20.367
<v Speaker 2>Different now it hasn't aged, It hasn't.

0:40:20.087 --> 0:40:23.047
<v Speaker 3>Actually aged that well, and a highly publicized court case.

0:40:23.087 --> 0:40:24.527
<v Speaker 3>To listen to that, there is a link in our

0:40:24.567 --> 0:40:25.007
<v Speaker 3>show notes.

0:40:25.127 --> 0:40:27.247
<v Speaker 2>I think it's hard being a female pop star, Oh

0:40:27.367 --> 0:40:34.527
<v Speaker 2>so hard. Every Tuesday and Thursday, we drop new segments

0:40:34.567 --> 0:40:38.287
<v Speaker 2>of Momma Mia out Loud just for Momma Mia subscribers.

0:40:38.807 --> 0:40:40.647
<v Speaker 2>Follow the link in the show notes to get your

0:40:40.727 --> 0:40:43.447
<v Speaker 2>daily dose of out Loud and a big Thank you

0:40:43.607 --> 0:40:48.287
<v Speaker 2>to all our current subscribers.

0:40:49.847 --> 0:40:52.487
<v Speaker 3>We woke up to the news this morning that Shannondohity,

0:40:52.607 --> 0:40:55.647
<v Speaker 3>aged fifty three, died after a decade long battle with

0:40:55.687 --> 0:40:59.167
<v Speaker 3>breast cancer, and despite her illness, her husband made her

0:40:59.207 --> 0:41:02.687
<v Speaker 3>suffer until the very end. Shannondohity is best known for

0:41:02.727 --> 0:41:04.727
<v Speaker 3>her roles in nine O two one zero and Charmed,

0:41:05.007 --> 0:41:07.847
<v Speaker 3>and in twenty fifteen, in her early forties, she was

0:41:07.887 --> 0:41:12.087
<v Speaker 3>diagnosed with breast cancer. Over the years, she documented a

0:41:12.127 --> 0:41:16.007
<v Speaker 3>lot of her experience with treatment, from surgery to radiation,

0:41:16.527 --> 0:41:19.927
<v Speaker 3>very publicly, and we knew that her cancer had spread.

0:41:20.487 --> 0:41:23.767
<v Speaker 3>Just last year, she launched a podcast where she revealed

0:41:23.807 --> 0:41:27.087
<v Speaker 3>that when she went into surgery to remove her brain tumor,

0:41:27.647 --> 0:41:30.807
<v Speaker 3>it was just after she'd discovered that her husband was

0:41:30.887 --> 0:41:31.487
<v Speaker 3>cheating on her.

0:41:31.687 --> 0:41:35.447
<v Speaker 1>I had brain surgery in twenty twenty three as well,

0:41:35.527 --> 0:41:39.127
<v Speaker 1>and I went in to that surgery early in the morning,

0:41:39.527 --> 0:41:43.647
<v Speaker 1>and I went in after I found out that, you know,

0:41:43.767 --> 0:41:48.287
<v Speaker 1>my marriage was essentially over, that my husband had been

0:41:48.327 --> 0:41:50.447
<v Speaker 1>carrying on an affair for two years.

0:41:50.687 --> 0:41:53.767
<v Speaker 3>She had been with kurt Iswarienko for fourteen years. When

0:41:53.767 --> 0:41:56.847
<v Speaker 3>she discovered he'd been having a two year affair. She

0:41:56.927 --> 0:42:00.527
<v Speaker 3>was heartbroken and filed for divorce in April twenty twenty three,

0:42:00.687 --> 0:42:04.087
<v Speaker 3>but more than a year on it still hadn't been finalized.

0:42:04.487 --> 0:42:09.047
<v Speaker 3>She wanted spousal support and claimed in court documents that

0:42:09.127 --> 0:42:12.807
<v Speaker 3>she was trying to pay for all this treatment while

0:42:12.847 --> 0:42:16.647
<v Speaker 3>he was on what sounds like their plane with another woman,

0:42:17.207 --> 0:42:20.407
<v Speaker 3>going around the world at Gucci, spending money on jewelry.

0:42:21.047 --> 0:42:23.487
<v Speaker 7>I had no idea about this story. I knew she

0:42:23.607 --> 0:42:26.327
<v Speaker 7>was unwell, but I had no idea.

0:42:26.407 --> 0:42:29.847
<v Speaker 3>In the court documents, she said, it is abundantly clear

0:42:29.887 --> 0:42:33.287
<v Speaker 3>to me that Kurt is intentionally delaying settlement in hopes

0:42:33.327 --> 0:42:36.087
<v Speaker 3>that I will not survive the divorce proceedings. It is

0:42:36.127 --> 0:42:38.647
<v Speaker 3>simply not right that Kurt be permitted to prolong our

0:42:38.687 --> 0:42:41.087
<v Speaker 3>divorce in hopes that I die before he is required

0:42:41.127 --> 0:42:43.607
<v Speaker 3>to pay me. Oh my God, while he continues to

0:42:43.647 --> 0:42:46.807
<v Speaker 3>live his life and shirk his responsibilities to his dying

0:42:46.887 --> 0:42:50.647
<v Speaker 3>wife of more than eleven years. Doherty was candid in

0:42:50.727 --> 0:42:53.407
<v Speaker 3>her podcast Let's Be Clear with Shannon Doherty, and even

0:42:53.527 --> 0:42:56.607
<v Speaker 3>had a rule for her funeral, Holly, What were her wishes?

0:42:57.007 --> 0:43:00.047
<v Speaker 2>She spoke on one of her podcasts about exactly how

0:43:00.047 --> 0:43:01.567
<v Speaker 2>she wanted to be remembered and what she wanted to

0:43:01.567 --> 0:43:02.967
<v Speaker 2>do with her money, and what she wanted to do

0:43:03.167 --> 0:43:06.527
<v Speaker 2>with her funeral, And she says she wanted her guest

0:43:06.567 --> 0:43:07.887
<v Speaker 2>list to be on the shorter side.

0:43:07.967 --> 0:43:09.767
<v Speaker 1>And there's a lot of people that I think would

0:43:09.767 --> 0:43:12.607
<v Speaker 1>show up that I don't want there, Like I don't

0:43:12.647 --> 0:43:16.647
<v Speaker 1>want them there because the reasons for showing up aren't

0:43:16.647 --> 0:43:20.127
<v Speaker 1>necessarily the best reasons, Like they don't really like me,

0:43:22.447 --> 0:43:24.487
<v Speaker 1>And you know, if they have their reasons, and good

0:43:24.527 --> 0:43:29.487
<v Speaker 1>for them, but they don't actually really like me enough

0:43:29.527 --> 0:43:31.567
<v Speaker 1>to show it to my funeral. But they will because

0:43:31.567 --> 0:43:34.007
<v Speaker 1>it's the politically correct thing to do, and they don't

0:43:34.007 --> 0:43:36.327
<v Speaker 1>want to look bad. I kind of want to take

0:43:36.367 --> 0:43:40.287
<v Speaker 1>that pressure off of them. And I want my funeral

0:43:40.327 --> 0:43:43.447
<v Speaker 1>to be like a love fest. I don't want people

0:43:43.447 --> 0:43:46.447
<v Speaker 1>to be crying or people to want people to privately

0:43:46.527 --> 0:43:49.087
<v Speaker 1>being like thank god that bitch is dead now, you know,

0:43:49.807 --> 0:43:52.967
<v Speaker 1>bye bye bitch, right, Like those are the things I

0:43:53.127 --> 0:43:53.647
<v Speaker 1>don't want.

0:43:53.847 --> 0:43:57.087
<v Speaker 4>Oh, it sounds like this podcast was like the full

0:43:57.127 --> 0:43:57.647
<v Speaker 4>Burn book.

0:43:57.887 --> 0:44:00.207
<v Speaker 2>Well, because the thing is about Shannon Doherty is that

0:44:00.287 --> 0:44:04.207
<v Speaker 2>if you were obsessed with that era of TV, so

0:44:04.447 --> 0:44:08.007
<v Speaker 2>Beverly Hills nine o two or no Charmed. She was

0:44:08.127 --> 0:44:12.247
<v Speaker 2>a constant in the tabloids in those days for being

0:44:12.407 --> 0:44:13.807
<v Speaker 2>and I'm just going to say it because I'm not

0:44:13.847 --> 0:44:15.567
<v Speaker 2>saying that this is what she was. This is her

0:44:15.647 --> 0:44:18.127
<v Speaker 2>reputation and what the tabloids decided she was, because you

0:44:18.167 --> 0:44:18.807
<v Speaker 2>know how much we.

0:44:18.927 --> 0:44:20.207
<v Speaker 4>Like to cast a role.

0:44:20.727 --> 0:44:23.487
<v Speaker 2>She was a bitch. She was the one who the

0:44:23.567 --> 0:44:26.487
<v Speaker 2>story went, was difficult with all the co stars, difficult

0:44:26.527 --> 0:44:30.207
<v Speaker 2>with Jason Priestley left that show on Charmed, difficult with

0:44:30.687 --> 0:44:35.087
<v Speaker 2>Alissa Milano left that show. So she's always been kind

0:44:35.127 --> 0:44:39.247
<v Speaker 2>of portrayed, rightly or wrongly, absolutely as being like a

0:44:39.287 --> 0:44:42.607
<v Speaker 2>woman who speaks her mind, wasn't afraid to make enemies,

0:44:42.847 --> 0:44:46.607
<v Speaker 2>said what she said, they go. And then what has happened,

0:44:46.607 --> 0:44:48.767
<v Speaker 2>obviously is that she has been very public about how

0:44:48.807 --> 0:44:51.527
<v Speaker 2>sick she's been for a long time. When it was

0:44:51.527 --> 0:44:53.247
<v Speaker 2>announced that she passed over the weekend, a lot of

0:44:53.247 --> 0:44:56.287
<v Speaker 2>those people, including Alisa Milano, have released statements saying how

0:44:56.327 --> 0:44:58.767
<v Speaker 2>sorry they are, as they should and as they would right.

0:44:59.727 --> 0:45:03.447
<v Speaker 2>What's interesting to me about the idea of saying so clearly,

0:45:03.487 --> 0:45:06.287
<v Speaker 2>don't pretend you're sad when I'm gone, is a really

0:45:06.287 --> 0:45:09.927
<v Speaker 2>interesting one, because if you've always lived your life as

0:45:09.967 --> 0:45:14.327
<v Speaker 2>being very straightforward about like, don't bullshit me. You know,

0:45:14.447 --> 0:45:16.727
<v Speaker 2>I'm not afraid to call out bad behavior if I

0:45:16.767 --> 0:45:19.607
<v Speaker 2>see it, or even behave badly if I am feeling it.

0:45:20.487 --> 0:45:22.567
<v Speaker 2>Don't pretend that I'm a saint when I'm gone. Don't

0:45:22.567 --> 0:45:24.367
<v Speaker 2>pretend that we loved each other when we didn't. Don't

0:45:24.367 --> 0:45:27.247
<v Speaker 2>pretend if you're my husband. And I mean, their divorce

0:45:27.367 --> 0:45:29.367
<v Speaker 2>was one of the most acrimonious I can remember in

0:45:29.367 --> 0:45:33.207
<v Speaker 2>Hollywood in that when they split, Doherty's agent released a

0:45:33.287 --> 0:45:37.167
<v Speaker 2>statement saying, if you want more details, ask his agent

0:45:37.327 --> 0:45:40.327
<v Speaker 2>because they're intimately involved, basically saying that he was having

0:45:40.327 --> 0:45:43.647
<v Speaker 2>an affair with his agent. And so it's kind of

0:45:43.687 --> 0:45:46.887
<v Speaker 2>interesting and I think worthy of respect that she's kind

0:45:46.887 --> 0:45:49.567
<v Speaker 2>of saying she's a woman who knew that her mortality

0:45:49.687 --> 0:45:51.527
<v Speaker 2>was finite. She was a woman who knew that the

0:45:51.607 --> 0:45:53.647
<v Speaker 2>end was close. The kind of people she wanted to

0:45:53.647 --> 0:45:56.647
<v Speaker 2>be around her, despite all the rumors that she was

0:45:56.687 --> 0:45:58.847
<v Speaker 2>difficult to work with. Her co host on her podcast

0:45:59.007 --> 0:46:01.807
<v Speaker 2>was Holly Marie Coombs, who was the other person on Charmed.

0:46:01.847 --> 0:46:04.047
<v Speaker 2>It was a show about three, which is if you

0:46:04.087 --> 0:46:07.207
<v Speaker 2>weren't familiar with it, and it was massive, massive, massive

0:46:07.207 --> 0:46:10.927
<v Speaker 2>in the naughties for a while they main friends, stayed friends.

0:46:10.967 --> 0:46:14.287
<v Speaker 2>Talk sometimes about the Milano stuffed but obviously she didn't

0:46:14.327 --> 0:46:17.927
<v Speaker 2>suffer fools, and she's saying, don't pretend just now I'm gone.

0:46:18.087 --> 0:46:23.287
<v Speaker 3>A celebrity death is so loaded because there's an expectation

0:46:23.407 --> 0:46:25.647
<v Speaker 3>that everyone who ever knew you or crossed paths with

0:46:25.727 --> 0:46:28.047
<v Speaker 3>you will make a statement, and if they don't, what's

0:46:28.047 --> 0:46:31.207
<v Speaker 3>wrong Exactly, So even the funeral would be about showing face,

0:46:31.407 --> 0:46:34.407
<v Speaker 3>Like she's saying, you know, something that would absolutely be true,

0:46:34.407 --> 0:46:37.007
<v Speaker 3>which is it? A Lissa Milano would probably be expected

0:46:37.327 --> 0:46:40.207
<v Speaker 3>and probably be advised by her agent that she show

0:46:40.327 --> 0:46:42.567
<v Speaker 3>up as a sign of respect, even though they'd had

0:46:42.607 --> 0:46:46.407
<v Speaker 3>this massive falling out, whereas in ordinary people's lives we

0:46:46.527 --> 0:46:48.967
<v Speaker 3>kind of just let that stuff lie. But because it

0:46:49.047 --> 0:46:50.287
<v Speaker 3>was also public for her, I don't.

0:46:50.367 --> 0:46:53.967
<v Speaker 7>No, don't people go to like the family funerals of

0:46:54.527 --> 0:46:55.967
<v Speaker 7>relatives they can't stand?

0:46:56.367 --> 0:46:59.127
<v Speaker 2>Yes, they do. And it's really interesting in that the

0:46:59.207 --> 0:47:01.687
<v Speaker 2>episode of mid I did with Jackie Bailey, who is

0:47:01.727 --> 0:47:04.287
<v Speaker 2>a funeral celebrant. She said that one of the most

0:47:04.327 --> 0:47:07.767
<v Speaker 2>complicated things often about funerals, obviously is dealing with the

0:47:07.767 --> 0:47:11.527
<v Speaker 2>family politics. And what people can and can't put aside,

0:47:11.927 --> 0:47:14.847
<v Speaker 2>and also the idea of your loved one after they've

0:47:14.887 --> 0:47:17.727
<v Speaker 2>gone being like a different person than the one that

0:47:17.847 --> 0:47:20.087
<v Speaker 2>you were with, so you suddenly can kind of imagine

0:47:20.087 --> 0:47:22.927
<v Speaker 2>that your relationship was different to how it was, or

0:47:23.447 --> 0:47:25.567
<v Speaker 2>she was saying how the cause of a lot of

0:47:25.687 --> 0:47:28.207
<v Speaker 2>tension in those final when a death is expected, in

0:47:28.247 --> 0:47:31.087
<v Speaker 2>those final months, week's days, is We're going to set

0:47:31.167 --> 0:47:33.807
<v Speaker 2>everything right in this very short period of time and

0:47:33.927 --> 0:47:36.607
<v Speaker 2>finally have that conversation that I've always been having in

0:47:36.607 --> 0:47:39.007
<v Speaker 2>my head with you, or set this relationship on a

0:47:39.047 --> 0:47:41.647
<v Speaker 2>path that I always truly believe it should be on

0:47:42.087 --> 0:47:46.087
<v Speaker 2>when actually a person who is dying is the same

0:47:46.127 --> 0:47:48.207
<v Speaker 2>person as they were when they're alive, and that your

0:47:48.247 --> 0:47:50.287
<v Speaker 2>relationship with them is going to be as complicated as

0:47:50.327 --> 0:47:52.727
<v Speaker 2>it always was. Like a lot of things we like

0:47:52.767 --> 0:47:55.487
<v Speaker 2>to see an absolute binary of, like is her ex

0:47:55.567 --> 0:47:57.727
<v Speaker 2>husband sad or is he happy? Like I'm sure that

0:47:57.847 --> 0:48:01.927
<v Speaker 2>his feelings about what's happened over the past, however long,

0:48:02.327 --> 0:48:03.807
<v Speaker 2>are very complicated too.

0:48:03.727 --> 0:48:06.327
<v Speaker 7>Well, he could have handled things differently. I mean, that's

0:48:06.327 --> 0:48:08.607
<v Speaker 7>still going through the courts. But what she said was

0:48:08.687 --> 0:48:11.967
<v Speaker 7>chilling to me about his slow walking this so that

0:48:12.007 --> 0:48:14.127
<v Speaker 7>he doesn't have to pay me because he knows that

0:48:14.167 --> 0:48:18.127
<v Speaker 7>I've got a very limited life expectancy, and his refusal

0:48:18.167 --> 0:48:20.687
<v Speaker 7>to do that means that the time I have left

0:48:21.487 --> 0:48:24.807
<v Speaker 7>will be awful. I can't have the comforts and any

0:48:24.887 --> 0:48:26.127
<v Speaker 7>sort of security.

0:48:26.407 --> 0:48:29.007
<v Speaker 3>This reminded me of an article I read in The

0:48:29.047 --> 0:48:32.767
<v Speaker 3>Guardian years ago which was all about men who leave

0:48:32.807 --> 0:48:35.727
<v Speaker 3>the terminally ill wives, and it said that the amount

0:48:35.767 --> 0:48:38.407
<v Speaker 3>of marriages that end you to terminal illness a relatively

0:48:38.447 --> 0:48:40.567
<v Speaker 3>small unlikely that your partner will leave you, I think

0:48:40.567 --> 0:48:43.567
<v Speaker 3>at six percent, But when you interrogate that six percent,

0:48:43.607 --> 0:48:46.887
<v Speaker 3>it is almost always the man who leaves. The reason,

0:48:46.967 --> 0:48:49.887
<v Speaker 3>they think, is a lot to do with gender division

0:48:49.887 --> 0:48:55.367
<v Speaker 3>within a household and the expectation that you clean, that

0:48:55.407 --> 0:48:58.127
<v Speaker 3>you provide, that you cook, and that you caretake the

0:48:58.207 --> 0:49:01.687
<v Speaker 3>care taking position. Not that it comes more naturally, but

0:49:01.727 --> 0:49:04.767
<v Speaker 3>maybe it's more expected for women. So there were all

0:49:04.807 --> 0:49:10.247
<v Speaker 3>these really heartbreaking stories of people remember ring, you know,

0:49:10.287 --> 0:49:13.527
<v Speaker 3>their mum and dad, and how their dad was often

0:49:13.687 --> 0:49:15.647
<v Speaker 3>very good, and it was saying that there's this thing

0:49:15.687 --> 0:49:18.087
<v Speaker 3>about men wanting to fix a problem, but when the

0:49:18.207 --> 0:49:22.967
<v Speaker 3>terminal diagnosis came in, they totally emotionally checked out, which

0:49:23.007 --> 0:49:27.007
<v Speaker 3>I just thought was so so tragic. And also she'd

0:49:27.047 --> 0:49:30.327
<v Speaker 3>had cancer for a long time before this affair had started,

0:49:30.327 --> 0:49:31.727
<v Speaker 3>and I wondered the impact of that.

0:49:32.007 --> 0:49:34.647
<v Speaker 4>I interviewed a woman called Rebecca Wolf, who's a writer.

0:49:35.087 --> 0:49:35.967
<v Speaker 4>She had four.

0:49:35.847 --> 0:49:38.127
<v Speaker 7>Children and had been with her husband for a really

0:49:38.127 --> 0:49:40.807
<v Speaker 7>long time and they were about to get divorced. It

0:49:40.847 --> 0:49:42.967
<v Speaker 7>had been a pretty unhappy marriage the last few years,

0:49:42.967 --> 0:49:46.647
<v Speaker 7>and it had been emotionally abusive from her point of view,

0:49:46.727 --> 0:49:49.167
<v Speaker 7>and it was just awful and she was getting out.

0:49:49.247 --> 0:49:52.927
<v Speaker 7>And then he was diagnosed with pancreatic cancer and given

0:49:52.927 --> 0:49:56.167
<v Speaker 7>a limited amount of time to live, and she talked

0:49:56.207 --> 0:50:01.367
<v Speaker 7>about how incredibly complicated that was, and she didn't, you know,

0:50:01.407 --> 0:50:04.127
<v Speaker 7>obviously all their plans to split up were put on

0:50:04.207 --> 0:50:08.527
<v Speaker 7>hold and people hadn't really known about it, and she

0:50:08.647 --> 0:50:12.767
<v Speaker 7>nursed him until he died. But she then had very

0:50:13.207 --> 0:50:14.847
<v Speaker 7>complicated feelings.

0:50:14.407 --> 0:50:15.367
<v Speaker 4>After his death.

0:50:15.967 --> 0:50:19.447
<v Speaker 7>She absolutely grieved, but it was different to the way

0:50:19.447 --> 0:50:22.447
<v Speaker 7>everyone thought she was grieving, which is it of someone

0:50:22.447 --> 0:50:23.967
<v Speaker 7>who was still with him and planning to be with

0:50:24.047 --> 0:50:26.287
<v Speaker 7>him into the future, and who'd lost a future. She

0:50:26.367 --> 0:50:29.047
<v Speaker 7>hadn't she'd lost her past, but she hadn't lost her

0:50:29.087 --> 0:50:31.167
<v Speaker 7>future and we'll put a link in the show notes.

0:50:31.207 --> 0:50:34.567
<v Speaker 7>It was an amazing interview to listen to. But what

0:50:34.687 --> 0:50:37.487
<v Speaker 7>do you do if you're a Lissa Milano on this day?

0:50:37.607 --> 0:50:38.847
<v Speaker 7>I mean, has she released?

0:50:39.127 --> 0:50:41.407
<v Speaker 2>Yes, she hasn't, And I actually think her statement's great,

0:50:41.487 --> 0:50:43.927
<v Speaker 2>she said. And some people were rolling their rise of

0:50:43.967 --> 0:50:45.807
<v Speaker 2>me like she shouldn't have released a statement, But I

0:50:45.807 --> 0:50:48.927
<v Speaker 2>think that's tough. She said. It's no secret that Shannon

0:50:48.927 --> 0:50:51.847
<v Speaker 2>and I had a complicated relationship, but at its core

0:50:52.087 --> 0:50:54.567
<v Speaker 2>with someone I deeply respected and was in awe of.

0:50:54.887 --> 0:50:57.807
<v Speaker 2>She was a talented actress, beloved by many, and the

0:50:57.847 --> 0:51:00.407
<v Speaker 2>world is less without her. My condolence is to all

0:51:00.407 --> 0:51:03.127
<v Speaker 2>who loved her. I think that's a great statement. I mean,

0:51:03.167 --> 0:51:07.127
<v Speaker 2>I think, yeah, it's not about you when somebody else passes.

0:51:07.207 --> 0:51:09.847
<v Speaker 2>And I think that if she hadn't a released statement,

0:51:09.847 --> 0:51:12.527
<v Speaker 2>everybody would have looked because there is nothing we love

0:51:12.607 --> 0:51:15.647
<v Speaker 2>more than a female feud in averted commas. So the

0:51:15.767 --> 0:51:20.367
<v Speaker 2>Milano Doherty feud is in the pop culture canon of

0:51:20.447 --> 0:51:23.687
<v Speaker 2>you know, co stars at war that we so buy into.

0:51:24.287 --> 0:51:25.927
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, I think they we'll probably look back

0:51:25.927 --> 0:51:28.327
<v Speaker 2>at Shannon Doherty, not in that way where we suddenly

0:51:28.327 --> 0:51:30.727
<v Speaker 2>have to erase anything that's complicated about a person when

0:51:30.767 --> 0:51:33.207
<v Speaker 2>they're gone. But in a way, what a gift to

0:51:33.527 --> 0:51:36.687
<v Speaker 2>make a podcast kind of and document this final battle

0:51:36.847 --> 0:51:42.327
<v Speaker 2>a cliched language, but this experience that is relatively common.

0:51:43.007 --> 0:51:45.647
<v Speaker 2>And also to be so upfront about who you are.

0:51:45.767 --> 0:51:48.487
<v Speaker 2>I mean, maybe she's not, you know, the easiest person

0:51:48.567 --> 0:51:51.327
<v Speaker 2>to work with, get along with whatever, but that doesn't

0:51:51.407 --> 0:51:54.767
<v Speaker 2>mean that, as Milano's said here, that a lot of

0:51:54.767 --> 0:51:57.687
<v Speaker 2>people will be devastated by her passing. I say veil,

0:51:58.047 --> 0:52:00.327
<v Speaker 2>and I also say go and watch Beverly Hills nine

0:52:00.367 --> 0:52:03.207
<v Speaker 2>o two one. It's one of the greatest shows ever made.

0:52:03.767 --> 0:52:06.727
<v Speaker 3>Out louders, If you feel like lifting spirits, well, may

0:52:06.927 --> 0:52:10.967
<v Speaker 3>I suggest that you listen to our subscriber episode on

0:52:11.047 --> 0:52:14.687
<v Speaker 3>a Family Affair, which stars Zac Efron and Nicole Goodman.

0:52:14.967 --> 0:52:16.607
<v Speaker 3>People have listened to it have a lot of thoughts.

0:52:16.687 --> 0:52:18.887
<v Speaker 3>I don't agree, so many thoughts, a lot of things

0:52:18.887 --> 0:52:21.047
<v Speaker 3>we said. They think that we should have focused on

0:52:21.127 --> 0:52:24.567
<v Speaker 3>other things more. They do being very cryptic, But please

0:52:24.567 --> 0:52:26.367
<v Speaker 3>go and listen and jump in the outlauders and let

0:52:26.447 --> 0:52:29.567
<v Speaker 3>us know what you thought about it, what your takeaways were. Overwhelmingly,

0:52:30.127 --> 0:52:32.487
<v Speaker 3>just say the Outlouder's not given it five stars, not five,

0:52:32.567 --> 0:52:35.687
<v Speaker 3>and we also were not giving it three or four

0:52:35.807 --> 0:52:38.607
<v Speaker 3>or five stars. So h you can listen to that

0:52:38.727 --> 0:52:40.047
<v Speaker 3>via the link in our show notes.

0:52:40.207 --> 0:52:42.407
<v Speaker 2>A very big thank you our friends for being here

0:52:42.447 --> 0:52:44.967
<v Speaker 2>with us on this enormous news Monday.

0:52:45.287 --> 0:52:47.367
<v Speaker 4>We were so loud, news cycles drunk and it needs

0:52:47.367 --> 0:52:47.767
<v Speaker 4>to go home.

0:52:47.967 --> 0:52:50.167
<v Speaker 2>I know there are like five other things we could

0:52:50.207 --> 0:52:52.887
<v Speaker 2>have talked about today too, but it's like we can't

0:52:52.927 --> 0:52:55.927
<v Speaker 2>crumb it all into our show. This episode was produced

0:52:55.927 --> 0:52:58.927
<v Speaker 2>by Emiline Gazillas. The assistant producer is Chylie Blackman. The

0:52:58.967 --> 0:53:01.127
<v Speaker 2>audio production from Lea Porgees. And we'll be back in

0:53:01.167 --> 0:53:04.767
<v Speaker 2>your ears tomorrow and then with more news and news

0:53:04.767 --> 0:53:06.647
<v Speaker 2>on Wednesday Byye.

0:53:07.487 --> 0:53:10.247
<v Speaker 4>Shout out to any Mum of me is subscribers listening.

0:53:10.447 --> 0:53:12.727
<v Speaker 4>If you love the show and want to support us

0:53:12.767 --> 0:53:15.567
<v Speaker 4>as well, subscribing to Mama Maya is the very best

0:53:15.647 --> 0:53:17.407
<v Speaker 4>way to do so. There is a link in the

0:53:17.447 --> 0:53:18.407
<v Speaker 4>episode description