WEBVTT - The Victoria Beckham Documentary Is Hard To Watch

0:00:10.622 --> 0:00:13.342
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to a MoMA Mia podcast.

0:00:13.822 --> 0:00:17.182
<v Speaker 2>Mamma Mia acknowledges the traditional owners of land and waters

0:00:17.222 --> 0:00:22.861
<v Speaker 2>that this podcast is recorded on Hello and welcome to

0:00:22.942 --> 0:00:25.262
<v Speaker 2>Mamma Mia out Loud. It's a brand new week. This

0:00:25.381 --> 0:00:27.821
<v Speaker 2>is what women are actually talking about on Monday, the

0:00:27.902 --> 0:00:30.621
<v Speaker 2>thirteenth of October. My name is Holly.

0:00:30.382 --> 0:00:34.542
<v Speaker 3>Wayne right, I am Amelia Luster and I am Jesse Stevens.

0:00:34.542 --> 0:00:36.582
<v Speaker 3>I have a fun fact before we start the show today.

0:00:36.702 --> 0:00:38.702
<v Speaker 3>Did you know so I've been seeing a pelvic floor

0:00:38.742 --> 0:00:41.062
<v Speaker 3>physio again to try and sort out.

0:00:40.902 --> 0:00:43.382
<v Speaker 2>The This is earlier in the piece than earlier in time.

0:00:43.582 --> 0:00:45.782
<v Speaker 2>She's pregnant. If anyone's wondering, if any out Loud is

0:00:45.822 --> 0:00:48.502
<v Speaker 2>you're like, why, so interact with whether or not Jesse's

0:00:48.542 --> 0:00:50.142
<v Speaker 2>seeing someone about her pelvic floor.

0:00:50.222 --> 0:00:53.101
<v Speaker 3>We've discussed with twins, right, and so I'm going, I

0:00:53.142 --> 0:00:56.222
<v Speaker 3>don't want to head hanging out at twenty weeks. Let's

0:00:56.222 --> 0:00:58.662
<v Speaker 3>sort this out. So I went and she was telling

0:00:58.702 --> 0:01:02.342
<v Speaker 3>me that when you sneeze as a woman, you're meant

0:01:02.422 --> 0:01:04.941
<v Speaker 3>to pull up. Did you know that from your pelvic floor?

0:01:05.021 --> 0:01:07.462
<v Speaker 3>So when you know you're going to sneeze, you're meant

0:01:07.502 --> 0:01:11.062
<v Speaker 3>to almost like a straw, get your floor and suck

0:01:11.062 --> 0:01:13.182
<v Speaker 3>it up through a straw so that you don't let

0:01:13.222 --> 0:01:15.301
<v Speaker 3>a little bit of way out. So now it's very

0:01:15.302 --> 0:01:18.702
<v Speaker 3>poliny in the like in Sydney. At the moment, everyone's sneezing,

0:01:18.822 --> 0:01:22.222
<v Speaker 3>So I keep sneezing, and I keep trying to do.

0:01:22.182 --> 0:01:24.502
<v Speaker 2>That as I'm interesting that every sneeze is a little

0:01:24.542 --> 0:01:27.462
<v Speaker 2>opportunity for self optimization exactly.

0:01:27.622 --> 0:01:29.942
<v Speaker 4>That reminds me, though, that I had a Floti Sitchu

0:01:30.022 --> 0:01:33.622
<v Speaker 4>once who said every woman is always clenching her buttocks,

0:01:33.782 --> 0:01:36.022
<v Speaker 4>So just think of that every time you think of

0:01:36.062 --> 0:01:36.942
<v Speaker 4>it unclenched.

0:01:37.022 --> 0:01:39.662
<v Speaker 3>It's very true. And your buttocks is not your public floor.

0:01:39.782 --> 0:01:41.862
<v Speaker 3>This is what my public floor phy say. She'd say,

0:01:42.062 --> 0:01:42.902
<v Speaker 3>let go of your.

0:01:42.742 --> 0:01:47.462
<v Speaker 4>Bum and of your bar matladers, hold on to your barm.

0:01:48.622 --> 0:01:49.062
<v Speaker 1>Two things.

0:01:49.142 --> 0:01:52.302
<v Speaker 2>Is making me all funny, you won't, sir. Anyway, None

0:01:52.342 --> 0:01:54.902
<v Speaker 2>of that actually made our agenda for today. What made

0:01:54.902 --> 0:01:56.982
<v Speaker 2>our agenda for today immediate Elesta.

0:01:56.902 --> 0:02:01.062
<v Speaker 4>Victoria Beckham has a new docu series on Netflix, and

0:02:01.102 --> 0:02:04.022
<v Speaker 4>she's made some big revelations in there about her complicated

0:02:04.062 --> 0:02:05.022
<v Speaker 4>relationship with food.

0:02:05.502 --> 0:02:08.862
<v Speaker 3>Plus Julia Morris says planes should have a women's only

0:02:08.901 --> 0:02:11.621
<v Speaker 3>section and hundreds of women have come forward sharing their

0:02:11.662 --> 0:02:14.542
<v Speaker 3>own horror stories. Does she have a point?

0:02:15.061 --> 0:02:18.862
<v Speaker 2>And Princess Kate has written an essay guaranteed to make

0:02:18.902 --> 0:02:20.702
<v Speaker 2>you squirm in guilty recognition.

0:02:21.022 --> 0:02:23.662
<v Speaker 4>But first, Amelia, but first, all eyes are on the

0:02:23.662 --> 0:02:26.502
<v Speaker 4>Middle East. Today it's Monday here in Australia and her

0:02:26.582 --> 0:02:31.102
<v Speaker 4>Mass has until eight o'clock Australian Eastern time tonight to

0:02:31.222 --> 0:02:35.382
<v Speaker 4>release all twenty remaining living hostages that are being held

0:02:35.422 --> 0:02:38.982
<v Speaker 4>in Gaza back to Israel. Israel has said this could

0:02:39.062 --> 0:02:43.501
<v Speaker 4>happen anytime today, starting it around midday Australian Eastern time,

0:02:43.942 --> 0:02:47.582
<v Speaker 4>and then after that process is done, Israel is going

0:02:47.622 --> 0:02:51.862
<v Speaker 4>to release about two thousand Palestinian detainees that it has.

0:02:52.462 --> 0:02:54.702
<v Speaker 4>Donald Trump is on his way there. Before he got

0:02:54.782 --> 0:02:57.262
<v Speaker 4>on the plane, he declared war is over. But of

0:02:57.302 --> 0:02:59.022
<v Speaker 4>course there is still a lot to be worked out,

0:02:59.062 --> 0:03:02.102
<v Speaker 4>and there is some last minute negotiating happening as we

0:03:02.462 --> 0:03:06.061
<v Speaker 4>entered this record between Hamas and Israel about which Palestinian

0:03:06.102 --> 0:03:09.062
<v Speaker 4>detainees are going to be released. But Trump is going

0:03:09.102 --> 0:03:12.182
<v Speaker 4>to go to eat next after this, assuming everything goes well,

0:03:12.222 --> 0:03:14.022
<v Speaker 4>and it's there that there's going to be a peace

0:03:14.062 --> 0:03:17.142
<v Speaker 4>plan for Gars assigned after some seven hundred and thirty

0:03:17.142 --> 0:03:20.902
<v Speaker 4>six days of war. So look, obviously things are unfolding

0:03:21.102 --> 0:03:23.542
<v Speaker 4>as we are recording here now, and they will continue

0:03:23.582 --> 0:03:25.742
<v Speaker 4>to do so over the coming couple of days. But

0:03:25.782 --> 0:03:28.222
<v Speaker 4>the Quickie is here to keep us updated this afternoon,

0:03:28.262 --> 0:03:31.542
<v Speaker 4>this evening, and then going forward on how everything unfolds.

0:03:32.462 --> 0:03:35.742
<v Speaker 2>Please don't tell anyone that I've been looking at paparazzi images,

0:03:35.902 --> 0:03:38.862
<v Speaker 2>because mom and mea, we do not support paparazzi economy.

0:03:38.902 --> 0:03:42.342
<v Speaker 3>But Holly, sometimes we see headlines without our own permission.

0:03:42.382 --> 0:03:44.902
<v Speaker 3>They just pop up out of nowhere, and you can't

0:03:45.022 --> 0:03:45.702
<v Speaker 3>see a headline.

0:03:46.342 --> 0:03:48.622
<v Speaker 4>Can we agree that every time we look at a

0:03:48.622 --> 0:03:52.702
<v Speaker 4>paparazzi image unwishingly or not necessarily by choice, that we

0:03:52.742 --> 0:03:54.622
<v Speaker 4>work on lifting our pelvic floor? Maybe?

0:03:54.702 --> 0:03:54.862
<v Speaker 1>Yes?

0:03:56.462 --> 0:03:57.942
<v Speaker 3>So true? A ten second hands?

0:03:58.102 --> 0:04:01.022
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, ten seconds holds? So I did at least a

0:04:01.022 --> 0:04:05.502
<v Speaker 2>thirty minute hold because I promise I didn't click through.

0:04:05.582 --> 0:04:07.582
<v Speaker 2>But anyway, I don't want you to know that I've

0:04:07.582 --> 0:04:09.822
<v Speaker 2>been looking at paparazi images, but I have, and I'm sorry,

0:04:09.862 --> 0:04:13.702
<v Speaker 2>but I have schoreless gossip from these images that Katie

0:04:13.742 --> 0:04:17.141
<v Speaker 2>Perry is definitely on with that just intrude.

0:04:17.502 --> 0:04:20.142
<v Speaker 1>Oh I love this story. I actually love there.

0:04:20.301 --> 0:04:22.981
<v Speaker 2>We talked about this schroreless gossip a while ago on

0:04:22.981 --> 0:04:24.942
<v Speaker 2>out Loud, and then it was kind of denied by

0:04:24.981 --> 0:04:25.581
<v Speaker 2>their camps.

0:04:25.741 --> 0:04:28.141
<v Speaker 4>I went on a date, yes, oh yeah, and he

0:04:28.342 --> 0:04:32.061
<v Speaker 4>was like, listen, we're just seeing each other as friends. Yeah,

0:04:32.061 --> 0:04:34.222
<v Speaker 4>I'm not romantically interested. Mate.

0:04:34.301 --> 0:04:37.981
<v Speaker 2>If you have glimpsed these images, there is nothing platonic

0:04:38.022 --> 0:04:40.142
<v Speaker 2>about them. They are I'll tell you so you don't

0:04:40.142 --> 0:04:41.782
<v Speaker 2>have to look out louder, so you can keep your

0:04:41.821 --> 0:04:46.461
<v Speaker 2>integrity intact. They are on Katie's yacht off the coast

0:04:46.462 --> 0:04:49.421
<v Speaker 2>of Santa Barbara. Apparently she's in a swimsuit and he's

0:04:49.462 --> 0:04:51.941
<v Speaker 2>in jeans, which I have a lot of questions about that,

0:04:52.981 --> 0:04:55.941
<v Speaker 2>but they are embracing and although you could argue, well,

0:04:55.981 --> 0:04:58.621
<v Speaker 2>friends hug each other when they see each other, his

0:04:58.782 --> 0:05:01.502
<v Speaker 2>hands are in places that friends do not go. Friends

0:05:01.541 --> 0:05:04.181
<v Speaker 2>do not put their hands there. So I just want

0:05:04.181 --> 0:05:06.941
<v Speaker 2>to tell you this is very exciting. I don't think

0:05:06.981 --> 0:05:09.101
<v Speaker 2>this is just about justin trying to get Canada on

0:05:09.181 --> 0:05:12.342
<v Speaker 2>Katie's next space mission. I don't think it's that. I

0:05:12.381 --> 0:05:16.342
<v Speaker 2>think they're on I'm excited scoreless gossip. I'm here for it.

0:05:16.462 --> 0:05:18.381
<v Speaker 3>Things are looking out for Katie. I think Katie's had

0:05:18.421 --> 0:05:21.782
<v Speaker 3>her rough twelve months. She copped a bit and I

0:05:21.861 --> 0:05:23.902
<v Speaker 3>think that she's due for a bit of good luck.

0:05:24.101 --> 0:05:25.662
<v Speaker 3>And I'm just all for it.

0:05:25.741 --> 0:05:28.541
<v Speaker 2>Is here, good dude, Amelia. You know things about politics

0:05:28.741 --> 0:05:30.141
<v Speaker 2>out side of the world, and he used to be

0:05:30.181 --> 0:05:31.582
<v Speaker 2>the prime minister Rink Canada.

0:05:31.821 --> 0:05:33.582
<v Speaker 3>He's a good issue.

0:05:34.222 --> 0:05:36.462
<v Speaker 4>It seems to hate him now for some reason.

0:05:36.582 --> 0:05:38.222
<v Speaker 3>I think that's just what happens when you used to

0:05:38.262 --> 0:05:40.101
<v Speaker 3>be the pan Wasn't his.

0:05:40.181 --> 0:05:44.381
<v Speaker 4>Dad like a notorious sort of celebrity hanger out.

0:05:44.741 --> 0:05:49.581
<v Speaker 2>Holy They are definitely a celebrity family, right those guys. Yeah, Yeah, definitely.

0:05:49.821 --> 0:05:52.582
<v Speaker 4>What I'm wondering about off the coast of Santa Barbara.

0:05:52.662 --> 0:05:56.622
<v Speaker 4>You know where that is, right, Montesito, anyone. I'm wondering

0:05:57.262 --> 0:06:00.301
<v Speaker 4>because Megan need I unpack this all for you. Megan

0:06:00.421 --> 0:06:04.622
<v Speaker 4>is good friends with Justin's ex wife. Yes, that's right,

0:06:04.702 --> 0:06:08.222
<v Speaker 4>and they have spent summer days together Paul side at

0:06:08.262 --> 0:06:11.181
<v Speaker 4>Megan and Harry's. I'm wondering, was there an awkward run

0:06:11.222 --> 0:06:12.781
<v Speaker 4>in at the Montecito shops.

0:06:13.541 --> 0:06:15.621
<v Speaker 3>Maybe they were looking out over the water and they

0:06:15.621 --> 0:06:16.541
<v Speaker 3>had their monoculars.

0:06:16.702 --> 0:06:22.061
<v Speaker 4>Well, because Katie and Orlando lived next door to Megan

0:06:22.101 --> 0:06:23.941
<v Speaker 4>and Harry, so it's all very messy.

0:06:24.101 --> 0:06:26.101
<v Speaker 2>Harry once said that Orlander would tip him off about

0:06:26.142 --> 0:06:28.541
<v Speaker 2>paps in the neighborhood. See I've seen the pap down

0:06:28.541 --> 0:06:29.022
<v Speaker 2>at IgA.

0:06:29.301 --> 0:06:30.181
<v Speaker 1>You better watch out.

0:06:30.501 --> 0:06:33.382
<v Speaker 2>And then you're right, because Megan has often talked about

0:06:33.421 --> 0:06:35.981
<v Speaker 2>having the Canadian first family round. That's when they were together.

0:06:36.061 --> 0:06:38.741
<v Speaker 2>So hot scandal it down.

0:06:38.821 --> 0:06:41.981
<v Speaker 4>The good that Oprah also lives there has sorted out

0:06:42.061 --> 0:06:46.501
<v Speaker 4>for them. So there's a new documentary series out, a

0:06:46.541 --> 0:06:50.461
<v Speaker 4>three part documentary on Netflix telling the life story of

0:06:50.541 --> 0:06:53.541
<v Speaker 4>Victoria Beckham. So you remember last year was the David

0:06:53.582 --> 0:06:58.421
<v Speaker 4>Beckham Netflix documentary. This year it's Victoria's turn. And Holly,

0:06:58.501 --> 0:07:01.261
<v Speaker 4>you asked me last week if I was enjoying watching

0:07:01.262 --> 0:07:02.702
<v Speaker 4>it because I just started watching it.

0:07:02.861 --> 0:07:05.261
<v Speaker 2>You watched the first app before I had seen it.

0:07:05.342 --> 0:07:07.701
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I was like it good like And I said,

0:07:08.142 --> 0:07:10.662
<v Speaker 4>you know, Holly, I'm finding it really hard to watch.

0:07:10.702 --> 0:07:12.982
<v Speaker 4>And I recounted a scene in the first episode that

0:07:13.022 --> 0:07:16.141
<v Speaker 4>has really stayed with me. David and Victoria are swanning

0:07:16.182 --> 0:07:21.142
<v Speaker 4>around their really marvelously charming looking country house kitchen and

0:07:21.462 --> 0:07:22.182
<v Speaker 4>they're about to.

0:07:22.142 --> 0:07:23.062
<v Speaker 1>Go out to an event.

0:07:23.142 --> 0:07:25.462
<v Speaker 4>And one detail I love in this is that they

0:07:25.582 --> 0:07:28.622
<v Speaker 4>both really like expensive wine, and David had poured them

0:07:28.662 --> 0:07:31.581
<v Speaker 4>both big you know, those big rich person goblets of

0:07:31.622 --> 0:07:33.742
<v Speaker 4>wine to drink before they went to an event, and

0:07:33.902 --> 0:07:36.022
<v Speaker 4>I guess they didn't have time to drink them, so

0:07:36.142 --> 0:07:39.982
<v Speaker 4>David pours them into flasks, essentially to drink in the

0:07:39.982 --> 0:07:42.742
<v Speaker 4>back of their limousine sippy cups. But then he also

0:07:42.862 --> 0:07:45.381
<v Speaker 4>says to her, do you want a whisper? There's a

0:07:45.422 --> 0:07:47.782
<v Speaker 4>little draw full of chocolate in their kitchen and it's

0:07:47.782 --> 0:07:49.822
<v Speaker 4>one of those fun size I guess is whisper a

0:07:49.862 --> 0:07:50.542
<v Speaker 4>British chocolate.

0:07:50.662 --> 0:07:53.022
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's gorgeous. It's kind of like a flake covered

0:07:53.022 --> 0:07:56.581
<v Speaker 2>in chocolate, but more air. Aw we it's They're delicious.

0:07:56.582 --> 0:07:57.542
<v Speaker 2>Whispers are delish.

0:07:57.742 --> 0:07:59.182
<v Speaker 4>So he says to her, do you want a whisper?

0:07:59.782 --> 0:08:02.302
<v Speaker 4>And then she makes a joke something along the lines

0:08:02.342 --> 0:08:04.702
<v Speaker 4>of not having touched chocolate since the nineties, I'm not

0:08:04.742 --> 0:08:06.821
<v Speaker 4>going to start eating it now. And I just thought,

0:08:06.982 --> 0:08:10.422
<v Speaker 4>this person clearly has a disordered relationship with food. And

0:08:10.462 --> 0:08:12.622
<v Speaker 4>that's what I said to you, And then that became

0:08:12.662 --> 0:08:13.982
<v Speaker 4>a theme of the whole show, didn't it?

0:08:13.982 --> 0:08:16.062
<v Speaker 2>It did? I was going to say, because that on

0:08:16.182 --> 0:08:18.701
<v Speaker 2>its own was kind of like, oh, yeah, we know,

0:08:18.902 --> 0:08:20.862
<v Speaker 2>we know. And also there was a lot of footage

0:08:20.862 --> 0:08:24.022
<v Speaker 2>in that first episode of them at the gym. Do

0:08:24.062 --> 0:08:27.062
<v Speaker 2>you notice that lots of less Victoria doing weights, lots

0:08:27.102 --> 0:08:30.022
<v Speaker 2>of midlife weightlifting, you know how that's what the ladies

0:08:30.062 --> 0:08:32.302
<v Speaker 2>are into. And I don't know what the protein count

0:08:32.342 --> 0:08:34.502
<v Speaker 2>and a whisper is so like she wouldn't be Yeah,

0:08:34.542 --> 0:08:37.542
<v Speaker 2>I don't think. I don't think she'd be guzzling those anyway.

0:08:38.062 --> 0:08:40.822
<v Speaker 2>But in the second episode we will have a few

0:08:40.822 --> 0:08:42.822
<v Speaker 2>spoilers in this but for people who really want to

0:08:42.862 --> 0:08:45.502
<v Speaker 2>dive into what we thought of the whole show, we're

0:08:45.502 --> 0:08:47.982
<v Speaker 2>going to do a special subject about it for tomorrow

0:08:47.982 --> 0:08:51.942
<v Speaker 2>for Tuesday. But in episode two they talk about the

0:08:51.982 --> 0:08:54.982
<v Speaker 2>food and the diet culture and eating disorders in a

0:08:55.022 --> 0:08:59.142
<v Speaker 2>more head on fashion right, And I actually found it

0:08:59.662 --> 0:09:03.702
<v Speaker 2>really moving and insightful. And I know there's a lot

0:09:03.742 --> 0:09:07.222
<v Speaker 2>of criticism about how surface level this show is, and

0:09:07.302 --> 0:09:11.142
<v Speaker 2>it is I think certainly compared to the David Beckham documentary.

0:09:12.342 --> 0:09:17.142
<v Speaker 2>It doesn't feel anywhere near as deep. But Victoria Beckham

0:09:17.462 --> 0:09:20.142
<v Speaker 2>POSH or Lady Beckham, as the BBC always calls her,

0:09:20.182 --> 0:09:22.662
<v Speaker 2>which I just love. Go and read some reporting on

0:09:22.702 --> 0:09:25.022
<v Speaker 2>the BBC website about this show, and even when talking

0:09:25.062 --> 0:09:27.582
<v Speaker 2>about the most mundane thing like wine sippy cups, they

0:09:27.582 --> 0:09:28.982
<v Speaker 2>referred to as Lady Beckham.

0:09:29.942 --> 0:09:31.862
<v Speaker 3>She'd love that, she would love that.

0:09:32.742 --> 0:09:36.222
<v Speaker 2>Lady Beckham is one of those celebrities who she has

0:09:36.262 --> 0:09:40.742
<v Speaker 2>been famous for thirty years. She is an absolute icon

0:09:40.822 --> 0:09:44.182
<v Speaker 2>of gen X culture in all her different guys is

0:09:45.022 --> 0:09:47.062
<v Speaker 2>and her skinniness. And I'm just going to say it

0:09:47.062 --> 0:09:48.982
<v Speaker 2>because I know, and this is part of what we're

0:09:49.022 --> 0:09:52.462
<v Speaker 2>going to discuss. I know the world we live in now,

0:09:52.542 --> 0:09:54.702
<v Speaker 2>you're not really meant to talk about that. So we're

0:09:54.702 --> 0:09:56.542
<v Speaker 2>not meant to say that we don't eat chocolate, and

0:09:56.582 --> 0:09:58.502
<v Speaker 2>we're not meant to talk about weight or bodies or

0:09:58.502 --> 0:10:02.182
<v Speaker 2>comment on the fact that Victoria Beckham has been unbelievably

0:10:02.262 --> 0:10:05.822
<v Speaker 2>thin for thirty years, but she has right Watching her

0:10:05.822 --> 0:10:08.062
<v Speaker 2>talk about that, even in that, you could see how

0:10:08.142 --> 0:10:13.302
<v Speaker 2>much it aimed her to discuss it. I found really

0:10:13.342 --> 0:10:16.542
<v Speaker 2>insightful because it just spoke to me of a very

0:10:16.582 --> 0:10:21.182
<v Speaker 2>specific moment in culture and what that does to you

0:10:21.222 --> 0:10:24.262
<v Speaker 2>over decades. Obviously an example of that and that level

0:10:24.262 --> 0:10:26.422
<v Speaker 2>of attention, we're about to play you a grab of

0:10:26.862 --> 0:10:30.462
<v Speaker 2>Posh as she was universally known in those days, appearing

0:10:30.542 --> 0:10:33.862
<v Speaker 2>on a very high profile television show hosted by a

0:10:34.022 --> 0:10:37.582
<v Speaker 2>very high profile host called Chris Evans in nineteen ninety nine,

0:10:37.662 --> 0:10:40.662
<v Speaker 2>not long after she has had her baby, Brooklyn. Who

0:10:40.702 --> 0:10:43.062
<v Speaker 2>will get to in the subject, I'm sure, And she

0:10:43.342 --> 0:10:45.381
<v Speaker 2>goes on the show and he asks her about her

0:10:45.382 --> 0:10:46.502
<v Speaker 2>body and her baby weight.

0:10:46.822 --> 0:10:48.662
<v Speaker 5>A lot of girls want to know, because you look

0:10:48.702 --> 0:10:50.622
<v Speaker 5>fantastic again, how did you get back to your shape

0:10:50.662 --> 0:10:52.182
<v Speaker 5>after your birth? I haven't done it.

0:10:52.182 --> 0:10:52.982
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I'm really lazy.

0:10:53.102 --> 0:10:54.022
<v Speaker 1>Let's go down.

0:10:54.182 --> 0:10:55.582
<v Speaker 2>May be one of the Sickney women who didn't have.

0:10:55.582 --> 0:10:56.142
<v Speaker 4>To do anything.

0:10:56.222 --> 0:10:56.862
<v Speaker 1>I don't. I don't.

0:10:56.862 --> 0:10:58.742
<v Speaker 5>Actually a lot of people say, does David help, you know,

0:10:58.822 --> 0:11:00.582
<v Speaker 5>so work out?

0:11:01.662 --> 0:11:02.182
<v Speaker 4>What way is that?

0:11:02.422 --> 0:11:02.702
<v Speaker 3>I don't?

0:11:02.742 --> 0:11:04.902
<v Speaker 5>No idea spot for USh?

0:11:04.942 --> 0:11:05.102
<v Speaker 4>You know?

0:11:05.262 --> 0:11:08.142
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, circuit training is your way back to normal?

0:11:08.262 --> 0:11:08.742
<v Speaker 4>Yeah it is?

0:11:08.782 --> 0:11:09.302
<v Speaker 3>Can I check?

0:11:10.062 --> 0:11:12.262
<v Speaker 5>Oh no, you didn't, Jerry, didn't you?

0:11:12.782 --> 0:11:16.222
<v Speaker 2>But Jerry was that really small? It's horrible.

0:11:16.582 --> 0:11:18.782
<v Speaker 1>Oh my god, I cannot believe that happens.

0:11:18.822 --> 0:11:21.182
<v Speaker 2>And he weighs her in on TV, which is something

0:11:21.222 --> 0:11:23.942
<v Speaker 2>that people used to do, and you know what, not

0:11:24.102 --> 0:11:26.982
<v Speaker 2>that long ago, I heard people weighing each other on

0:11:27.022 --> 0:11:29.742
<v Speaker 2>the radio, like this is celebrity culture that is in

0:11:29.782 --> 0:11:33.262
<v Speaker 2>the past that we can touch. And then she talks

0:11:33.422 --> 0:11:37.182
<v Speaker 2>about the impact of the spotlight from being a young

0:11:37.262 --> 0:11:39.742
<v Speaker 2>dancer all the way through to now on her body

0:11:39.742 --> 0:11:41.582
<v Speaker 2>and body image, and it's probably the most honest she's

0:11:41.622 --> 0:11:42.302
<v Speaker 2>ever been about it.

0:11:42.342 --> 0:11:46.102
<v Speaker 5>This is what she says, when you have an eating disorder,

0:11:46.822 --> 0:11:49.182
<v Speaker 5>you become very good at lying. And I was never

0:11:49.262 --> 0:11:52.542
<v Speaker 5>honest about it with my parents. I never talked about

0:11:52.582 --> 0:11:56.462
<v Speaker 5>it publicly. It really affects you when you're being told

0:11:56.662 --> 0:11:58.142
<v Speaker 5>constantly you're not good enough.

0:11:58.822 --> 0:12:01.982
<v Speaker 4>So it's a bit ambiguous about whether or not she

0:12:02.182 --> 0:12:06.062
<v Speaker 4>is still struggling with that, but she certainly refers to

0:12:06.102 --> 0:12:09.422
<v Speaker 4>this feeling of inadequacy that has fueled her her whole life.

0:12:09.662 --> 0:12:13.342
<v Speaker 3>And yet when she says I was controlling it in

0:12:13.382 --> 0:12:17.022
<v Speaker 3>an incredibly unhealthy way, it sounds like it's past tense.

0:12:17.022 --> 0:12:20.142
<v Speaker 3>And I understand why she puts it into past tense.

0:12:20.182 --> 0:12:22.982
<v Speaker 3>I think it's a much more palatable way to talk

0:12:23.022 --> 0:12:26.182
<v Speaker 3>about any sort of mental illness, to have it as

0:12:26.342 --> 0:12:28.382
<v Speaker 3>an arc which you have overcome.

0:12:28.542 --> 0:12:29.862
<v Speaker 2>I actually she did do that.

0:12:30.022 --> 0:12:32.662
<v Speaker 3>I felt as though it was implicit that the only

0:12:32.702 --> 0:12:35.822
<v Speaker 3>reason she felt at all comfortable with it because this

0:12:35.982 --> 0:12:40.342
<v Speaker 3>documentary was about triumph. It was about all the assumptions

0:12:40.342 --> 0:12:43.782
<v Speaker 3>that had been made about her and her reinventions and basically,

0:12:43.822 --> 0:12:46.382
<v Speaker 3>look at where I am now. And so it wouldn't

0:12:46.422 --> 0:12:49.422
<v Speaker 3>have really fit for her to sit there and say,

0:12:50.062 --> 0:12:51.302
<v Speaker 3>and I still have an aiding, Didace?

0:12:51.342 --> 0:12:51.622
<v Speaker 4>You know what?

0:12:51.982 --> 0:12:54.702
<v Speaker 2>I think that's so interesting because I saw it so differently,

0:12:54.862 --> 0:12:58.182
<v Speaker 2>because the narrative we would all be really comfortable with

0:12:58.942 --> 0:13:01.462
<v Speaker 2>would be an explicit one of and this is we've

0:13:01.462 --> 0:13:05.062
<v Speaker 2>seen it a million times. I was struggling. I'm not

0:13:05.222 --> 0:13:08.062
<v Speaker 2>struggling now. I now have learned to have a healthy

0:13:08.102 --> 0:13:10.822
<v Speaker 2>relationship with my body, my image, my food. She didn't

0:13:10.822 --> 0:13:13.782
<v Speaker 2>say any of that, and in fact, it is incredibly

0:13:13.862 --> 0:13:17.182
<v Speaker 2>clear from how much she talked about control, how much

0:13:17.222 --> 0:13:20.662
<v Speaker 2>she talked about hating literally hating what she looks like.

0:13:21.102 --> 0:13:22.382
<v Speaker 2>And this is a woman who's had to look at

0:13:22.422 --> 0:13:25.062
<v Speaker 2>pictures of herself for thirty years, bestorked by the paparazzi,

0:13:25.102 --> 0:13:28.502
<v Speaker 2>all those things. It's incredibly clear, really when you watch

0:13:28.542 --> 0:13:32.141
<v Speaker 2>this that she is still incredibly self conscious. Anytime a

0:13:32.182 --> 0:13:35.182
<v Speaker 2>camera has pointed at her, she is intensely buttoned up

0:13:35.182 --> 0:13:37.582
<v Speaker 2>and controlled, even when it's doing a TikTok dance with

0:13:37.622 --> 0:13:39.942
<v Speaker 2>her daughter. You know, there's a scene where she and

0:13:39.982 --> 0:13:42.382
<v Speaker 2>Harper do a TikTok dance in there what looks like

0:13:42.462 --> 0:13:45.422
<v Speaker 2>skyscraper in londartment. Yeah, and she's like, oh yeah, the

0:13:45.462 --> 0:13:50.502
<v Speaker 2>angle's flattering, Like she is so steeped in that controlling

0:13:50.622 --> 0:13:54.182
<v Speaker 2>diet culture of the time. I don't think she's pretending

0:13:54.222 --> 0:13:54.622
<v Speaker 2>she's free.

0:13:54.862 --> 0:13:57.982
<v Speaker 4>Flattering is in fact her highest compliment. She says that's

0:13:57.982 --> 0:14:00.342
<v Speaker 4>why she started a clothing line is because she wanted

0:14:00.382 --> 0:14:03.182
<v Speaker 4>to make flattering clothing. But I think why this felt

0:14:03.182 --> 0:14:05.742
<v Speaker 4>like such a big deal is because, as you say, Holly,

0:14:05.862 --> 0:14:10.142
<v Speaker 4>we've known Victoria Beckham for thirty years and there should

0:14:10.182 --> 0:14:14.022
<v Speaker 4>be actually nothing surprising necessarily about her admitting this. Shocking

0:14:14.102 --> 0:14:17.902
<v Speaker 4>as it is, it shouldn't be surprising. And yet Hadley Freeman,

0:14:18.022 --> 0:14:20.942
<v Speaker 4>who's a writer in the UK Times, who herself has

0:14:20.982 --> 0:14:23.982
<v Speaker 4>written about extensively her own struggles with an eating disorder

0:14:23.982 --> 0:14:27.262
<v Speaker 4>as a teenager, she points out that we've been looking

0:14:27.262 --> 0:14:31.062
<v Speaker 4>at Victoria looking this way for years, for decades, and

0:14:31.142 --> 0:14:33.982
<v Speaker 4>yet somehow we didn't want to see what was obvious.

0:14:34.022 --> 0:14:38.062
<v Speaker 4>We didn't even want to acknowledge it until she herself

0:14:38.302 --> 0:14:39.702
<v Speaker 4>said it on this show.

0:14:40.302 --> 0:14:42.662
<v Speaker 1>And we've got to ask why that is, because we

0:14:42.782 --> 0:14:43.342
<v Speaker 1>do this all.

0:14:43.262 --> 0:14:46.622
<v Speaker 4>The time, when celebrities become half the size that they

0:14:46.662 --> 0:14:49.462
<v Speaker 4>once were. Ariana Grande, we saw this recently. It was

0:14:49.502 --> 0:14:51.822
<v Speaker 4>almost like we weren't allowed to talk about it.

0:14:51.822 --> 0:14:54.782
<v Speaker 3>It seems like there is something so different about our

0:14:54.822 --> 0:14:57.182
<v Speaker 3>treatment of any sort of eating disorders, no matter how

0:14:57.222 --> 0:15:00.582
<v Speaker 3>it manifests in how your body looks. But it seems

0:15:00.582 --> 0:15:03.502
<v Speaker 3>to be the only mental illness to which we afford

0:15:03.702 --> 0:15:07.302
<v Speaker 3>barely any empathy. It's a mental illness that we approach

0:15:07.382 --> 0:15:11.222
<v Speaker 3>with contempt and often anger. Just like, why does she

0:15:11.302 --> 0:15:13.582
<v Speaker 3>look like that impossible beauty standard?

0:15:13.662 --> 0:15:13.782
<v Speaker 4>Is that?

0:15:13.822 --> 0:15:14.622
<v Speaker 1>Blah blah blah?

0:15:14.662 --> 0:15:16.702
<v Speaker 4>Is that why you're saying that we don't talk about

0:15:16.742 --> 0:15:18.702
<v Speaker 4>it because we just don't.

0:15:18.462 --> 0:15:19.342
<v Speaker 1>Regard it as real.

0:15:19.422 --> 0:15:21.462
<v Speaker 4>Maybe, yeah, we don't regard it as an illness, and.

0:15:21.422 --> 0:15:25.582
<v Speaker 3>I think also as something that is like endemic to Hollywood,

0:15:25.822 --> 0:15:27.302
<v Speaker 3>to celebrity.

0:15:26.782 --> 0:15:28.502
<v Speaker 1>Cost costs to join business. Yeah.

0:15:28.542 --> 0:15:31.142
<v Speaker 3>So in that essay, Freeman said as well, why would

0:15:31.222 --> 0:15:34.662
<v Speaker 3>any celebrity recover from anorexia given how high the rewards

0:15:34.742 --> 0:15:38.702
<v Speaker 3>now are for extreme thinness? Like that's it's the game

0:15:38.742 --> 0:15:40.502
<v Speaker 3>and she's playing it, which sounds like a really callous

0:15:40.542 --> 0:15:43.542
<v Speaker 3>way to describe it. But it is an illness. But

0:15:43.662 --> 0:15:47.902
<v Speaker 3>because it's an illness that almost conforms to a standard

0:15:47.942 --> 0:15:51.622
<v Speaker 3>that society rewards, we just don't want to treat it

0:15:51.662 --> 0:15:52.902
<v Speaker 3>with any empathy.

0:15:53.102 --> 0:15:55.342
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, because for exactly that reason, because it is a

0:15:55.382 --> 0:15:58.062
<v Speaker 2>standard that society rewards. But this is the thing, is

0:15:58.102 --> 0:16:02.102
<v Speaker 2>that my complex feelings about watching Posh talk about that.

0:16:02.142 --> 0:16:05.662
<v Speaker 2>And I may have been over empathizing because I feel

0:16:05.702 --> 0:16:08.022
<v Speaker 2>like I know Victoria Beckham when obviously I don't. But

0:16:08.062 --> 0:16:11.382
<v Speaker 2>she has been so front and center in pop culture

0:16:11.382 --> 0:16:15.022
<v Speaker 2>for so long, but it's very complicated to think of

0:16:15.102 --> 0:16:17.302
<v Speaker 2>the fact that someone who is part of the problem.

0:16:17.382 --> 0:16:21.422
<v Speaker 2>So she was in those naughty size zero years, the

0:16:21.502 --> 0:16:24.622
<v Speaker 2>pictures of her in tiny little hotpants when she had

0:16:24.622 --> 0:16:26.382
<v Speaker 2>the big fake boobs, which she also talks about in

0:16:26.382 --> 0:16:28.302
<v Speaker 2>the show and says I buried those in Baden Baden,

0:16:28.342 --> 0:16:31.702
<v Speaker 2>which was a European championships where all the wags looked

0:16:31.742 --> 0:16:34.302
<v Speaker 2>like that, and she was the queen right, tiny, like

0:16:34.502 --> 0:16:37.502
<v Speaker 2>really tiny, tinier than a seven year old child. Tiny,

0:16:37.742 --> 0:16:39.942
<v Speaker 2>but with the big boobs, tiny hotpants, all those things

0:16:40.302 --> 0:16:42.942
<v Speaker 2>that was held up and put everywhere as almost like

0:16:43.102 --> 0:16:45.982
<v Speaker 2>a warning but also something you want right, So it's

0:16:46.062 --> 0:16:50.902
<v Speaker 2>like ooh, yum, yum, ooh, that's the vibe. And the

0:16:50.982 --> 0:16:53.862
<v Speaker 2>thing is is that the complicated relationship you have with

0:16:53.942 --> 0:16:56.222
<v Speaker 2>Posh is that she was part of that problem because

0:16:56.222 --> 0:16:58.862
<v Speaker 2>she was the pinup, one of the primary pinups. She

0:16:59.102 --> 0:17:01.222
<v Speaker 2>still is in a way, and that this is what

0:17:01.262 --> 0:17:02.982
<v Speaker 2>I mean about. I don't think she was trying to

0:17:02.982 --> 0:17:05.141
<v Speaker 2>suggest that all her issues with food and body are

0:17:05.142 --> 0:17:07.821
<v Speaker 2>in the past. She has not changed even an iota,

0:17:07.902 --> 0:17:11.182
<v Speaker 2>as in still clearly something she works very hard at

0:17:11.382 --> 0:17:14.022
<v Speaker 2>and considers the height of beauty. So she is part

0:17:14.101 --> 0:17:16.982
<v Speaker 2>of the problem, but she's also a victim of the problem.

0:17:17.061 --> 0:17:19.502
<v Speaker 2>And I think that's really confusing to try and hold

0:17:19.581 --> 0:17:22.341
<v Speaker 2>in your head, because for me, there was a really

0:17:22.381 --> 0:17:25.462
<v Speaker 2>telling bit because she has literally been followed by paparazzi,

0:17:25.861 --> 0:17:28.902
<v Speaker 2>as I say, for three decades through lots of phases

0:17:28.901 --> 0:17:31.261
<v Speaker 2>of her life. And there's a telling bit where her

0:17:31.262 --> 0:17:33.621
<v Speaker 2>and Eva Longot because she becomes friends with the Hollywoods

0:17:33.621 --> 0:17:35.542
<v Speaker 2>when she goes to live in la when David goes

0:17:35.581 --> 0:17:38.581
<v Speaker 2>to place for Galaxy, and she and Eva Longoria a

0:17:38.821 --> 0:17:41.341
<v Speaker 2>being papped when they're out on Mulholland drive or whatever,

0:17:41.742 --> 0:17:44.262
<v Speaker 2>and she said I couldn't believe her relaxed in front

0:17:44.262 --> 0:17:46.581
<v Speaker 2>of the cameras Eva Longoria was. And this is a

0:17:46.621 --> 0:17:48.621
<v Speaker 2>time too when she was very thin and the Desperate

0:17:48.661 --> 0:17:52.101
<v Speaker 2>Housewives size zero era, but she was like, she didn't

0:17:52.101 --> 0:17:54.061
<v Speaker 2>seem to care whether she smiled in a way that

0:17:54.141 --> 0:17:56.462
<v Speaker 2>gave her a double chin or whether she like looked,

0:17:56.661 --> 0:18:00.262
<v Speaker 2>whereas Posh was clearly has been. So I'm going to

0:18:00.381 --> 0:18:02.821
<v Speaker 2>use the word that might make some people roll their eyes,

0:18:02.861 --> 0:18:06.141
<v Speaker 2>but like traumatized by that glare and that criticism and

0:18:06.141 --> 0:18:10.381
<v Speaker 2>that relentless comparison from a very formative young that she

0:18:10.702 --> 0:18:12.742
<v Speaker 2>can't just be in the world, so she's in awe

0:18:12.782 --> 0:18:14.821
<v Speaker 2>of people who can. And she clearly is still that

0:18:14.861 --> 0:18:17.741
<v Speaker 2>way because one of the things about this doco, it's

0:18:17.821 --> 0:18:19.861
<v Speaker 2>quite a shallow doco. As we said, I enjoyed it

0:18:19.901 --> 0:18:21.581
<v Speaker 2>for lots of reasons we'll get into in the subset,

0:18:21.661 --> 0:18:24.542
<v Speaker 2>but it was meant to be, as you say, a

0:18:24.661 --> 0:18:27.782
<v Speaker 2>victorious thing but also a plucky Vicky you know, go

0:18:27.861 --> 0:18:30.021
<v Speaker 2>buy an eyeliner because she's been through some tough times

0:18:30.101 --> 0:18:34.022
<v Speaker 2>kind of vibe. She is clearly still unbelievably self conscious

0:18:34.022 --> 0:18:37.502
<v Speaker 2>about her appearance, every angle, every shot, every and I

0:18:37.542 --> 0:18:39.101
<v Speaker 2>don't know, I felt a lot of empathy for it

0:18:39.101 --> 0:18:40.341
<v Speaker 2>because I think it's complicated.

0:18:40.542 --> 0:18:43.661
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and there were some specifics, like she referred to

0:18:43.982 --> 0:18:46.581
<v Speaker 3>an article that was written eleven days after she gave

0:18:46.661 --> 0:18:50.101
<v Speaker 3>birth that was basically saying she was still carrying the

0:18:50.141 --> 0:18:52.901
<v Speaker 3>baby weight. And it also made me think of a

0:18:52.942 --> 0:18:55.821
<v Speaker 3>few years ago when David Beckham flippantly said in an

0:18:55.821 --> 0:19:00.141
<v Speaker 3>interview that Victoria had only eaten grilled fish and steamed

0:19:00.222 --> 0:19:03.861
<v Speaker 3>vegetables since he met her, and it started this big

0:19:03.901 --> 0:19:06.982
<v Speaker 3>discussion about whether or not that was healthy and whether

0:19:07.061 --> 0:19:10.061
<v Speaker 3>that was a sign of disordered eating. And we as

0:19:10.061 --> 0:19:15.381
<v Speaker 3>a society enabling this by like what allowing Victoria to exist? Like,

0:19:15.422 --> 0:19:18.021
<v Speaker 3>I don't know what I understand why we police our

0:19:18.022 --> 0:19:19.982
<v Speaker 3>own language in public, because I think that the way

0:19:19.982 --> 0:19:23.261
<v Speaker 3>that we talk about women's bodies publicly should be different

0:19:23.302 --> 0:19:26.061
<v Speaker 3>to how we might talk about them privately, because there's

0:19:26.101 --> 0:19:29.542
<v Speaker 3>more of a responsibility and you don't know who's listening,

0:19:29.581 --> 0:19:31.581
<v Speaker 3>and you don't know what they're going through, and everyone's

0:19:31.581 --> 0:19:35.941
<v Speaker 3>relationship is really complicated with it. But the idea that

0:19:36.982 --> 0:19:41.101
<v Speaker 3>that Victoria Beckham is being enabled by being allowed to

0:19:41.422 --> 0:19:44.502
<v Speaker 3>be on television have a job. When she's that thin,

0:19:44.901 --> 0:19:46.461
<v Speaker 3>we are enabling her.

0:19:47.262 --> 0:19:49.942
<v Speaker 4>I just look, I think we can all agree that

0:19:50.141 --> 0:19:53.581
<v Speaker 4>anyone who is struggling with the mental illness deserves empathy. Yeah,

0:19:53.702 --> 0:19:56.101
<v Speaker 4>of course includes people with eating disorders, which are among

0:19:56.182 --> 0:19:57.821
<v Speaker 4>the deadliest mental illnesses.

0:19:58.502 --> 0:19:59.502
<v Speaker 1>But stepping back a.

0:19:59.462 --> 0:20:02.782
<v Speaker 4>Little bit, like when David said that flippantly, or when

0:20:02.861 --> 0:20:06.422
<v Speaker 4>Victoria flippantly said I haven't eaten chocolate sinster nineties, that's

0:20:06.462 --> 0:20:09.381
<v Speaker 4>regarded as charming, Like whenever she talks about food, it's

0:20:09.381 --> 0:20:11.742
<v Speaker 4>in that same way as she does in the documentary,

0:20:11.901 --> 0:20:14.941
<v Speaker 4>Or when David said that about her eating the steamfish

0:20:14.942 --> 0:20:17.462
<v Speaker 4>and vegetables, and it kicked off a discourse about whether

0:20:17.462 --> 0:20:18.262
<v Speaker 4>we should enable that.

0:20:18.302 --> 0:20:21.342
<v Speaker 1>But it's not normal. It's not healthy to only eat

0:20:21.341 --> 0:20:23.341
<v Speaker 1>steam fish and vegetables for your whole life.

0:20:23.462 --> 0:20:26.382
<v Speaker 2>So my question is do we expect all the all

0:20:26.381 --> 0:20:28.621
<v Speaker 2>the famous people in the world to only present a

0:20:28.742 --> 0:20:31.782
<v Speaker 2>very well adjusted front to us at all times? Because

0:20:31.821 --> 0:20:33.222
<v Speaker 2>I agree with you, Amelia, like I agree with you

0:20:33.222 --> 0:20:34.101
<v Speaker 2>one hundred percent.

0:20:33.901 --> 0:20:36.821
<v Speaker 1>Like it's it made me feel bad, it's X.

0:20:36.901 --> 0:20:38.502
<v Speaker 2>This is the way that gen X women have always

0:20:38.502 --> 0:20:41.662
<v Speaker 2>talked about food, right, It's never just food, and it's

0:20:41.742 --> 0:20:44.981
<v Speaker 2>unfortunate and it's terrible, and I think we're prosecuting that.

0:20:45.341 --> 0:20:48.142
<v Speaker 2>But my question is is it better to edit all

0:20:48.141 --> 0:20:51.502
<v Speaker 2>that stuff out of it and pretend that Victoria Beckham

0:20:51.621 --> 0:20:53.742
<v Speaker 2>is healthier than she is when it comes to this stuff.

0:20:53.742 --> 0:20:54.941
<v Speaker 2>That's my genuine question.

0:20:55.262 --> 0:20:55.821
<v Speaker 1>I don't know.

0:20:55.901 --> 0:20:57.742
<v Speaker 4>I think my problem is not so much with how

0:20:57.861 --> 0:21:01.462
<v Speaker 4>Victoria Beckham talks about it as so much as what

0:21:01.542 --> 0:21:05.101
<v Speaker 4>message are we sending when we do reward these women

0:21:05.182 --> 0:21:08.222
<v Speaker 4>who are clearly have been starving themselves for decades and

0:21:08.262 --> 0:21:11.061
<v Speaker 4>say that's the height of fashion. That's literally fashion means

0:21:11.182 --> 0:21:13.621
<v Speaker 4>howeveryone wants to look and what is regarded as she

0:21:13.821 --> 0:21:16.782
<v Speaker 4>can trendy. We reward them with our money and with

0:21:16.861 --> 0:21:19.661
<v Speaker 4>our attention, and then we expect our children to not

0:21:19.742 --> 0:21:20.462
<v Speaker 4>listen to us.

0:21:20.782 --> 0:21:25.182
<v Speaker 2>But we reward them, and we also relentlessly criticize them.

0:21:25.222 --> 0:21:25.821
<v Speaker 1>Do you know what I mean?

0:21:25.861 --> 0:21:28.302
<v Speaker 3>We reward the culture while at the same time punishing

0:21:28.341 --> 0:21:30.381
<v Speaker 3>the individual. Yes, which is so cruel.

0:21:30.542 --> 0:21:32.381
<v Speaker 2>That's what I was kind of wrestling with when I'm saying,

0:21:32.422 --> 0:21:35.021
<v Speaker 2>she's like part of the problem with the whole I

0:21:35.022 --> 0:21:38.421
<v Speaker 2>haven't eaten chocolate since the nineties and also a victim

0:21:38.462 --> 0:21:40.542
<v Speaker 2>of it in that like, of course she's like that,

0:21:40.861 --> 0:21:44.101
<v Speaker 2>And I just wonder because I agree with you, but

0:21:44.422 --> 0:21:47.182
<v Speaker 2>I feel like there's freedom to me, or there's some

0:21:47.302 --> 0:21:50.942
<v Speaker 2>honesty to me. I think when women who are that

0:21:50.982 --> 0:21:55.182
<v Speaker 2>impossibly sin which is always held up as desirable, when actually,

0:21:55.302 --> 0:21:57.302
<v Speaker 2>if we're all being honest, I don't know that it

0:21:57.381 --> 0:22:01.182
<v Speaker 2>is that desirable to have such an you know, it's

0:22:01.222 --> 0:22:03.502
<v Speaker 2>hard to say the words without sounding critical, but such

0:22:03.542 --> 0:22:05.821
<v Speaker 2>a very very tiny body shape that clearly you have

0:22:05.861 --> 0:22:08.782
<v Speaker 2>to restrict yourself so heavily to have. But I guess

0:22:08.821 --> 0:22:12.341
<v Speaker 2>my point is, is it better if she pretends that

0:22:12.462 --> 0:22:13.462
<v Speaker 2>she eats burgers?

0:22:13.621 --> 0:22:14.302
<v Speaker 3>Do you know what I mean?

0:22:14.462 --> 0:22:16.701
<v Speaker 4>No, I completely see that question. I guess it just

0:22:16.742 --> 0:22:19.501
<v Speaker 4>comes back to look, Obviously, she's entitled to eat whatever

0:22:19.621 --> 0:22:22.022
<v Speaker 4>she wants, and if that's steamfish and vegetables are never

0:22:22.141 --> 0:22:25.901
<v Speaker 4>any chocolate, that's fine. But it makes me a bit sad.

0:22:25.901 --> 0:22:28.421
<v Speaker 4>And I also think it's a bit disingenuous to say

0:22:29.022 --> 0:22:31.581
<v Speaker 4>that she has only been a victim in this. She

0:22:31.661 --> 0:22:35.141
<v Speaker 4>has been rewarded with immense fame and fortune as a

0:22:35.182 --> 0:22:38.302
<v Speaker 4>result of starving herself. Now that's not her problem, that's

0:22:38.341 --> 0:22:40.061
<v Speaker 4>our problem.

0:22:40.101 --> 0:22:42.661
<v Speaker 2>I think she's both I think that's what's complicated about it.

0:22:42.742 --> 0:22:47.421
<v Speaker 2>I think she's both. I think personally I felt sad,

0:22:47.821 --> 0:22:50.462
<v Speaker 2>Like after episode term particular, I felt really sad, and

0:22:50.621 --> 0:22:52.181
<v Speaker 2>I was glad about that. I don't want to just

0:22:52.222 --> 0:22:55.622
<v Speaker 2>watch something that just makes me go perfect, happy, shiny life,

0:22:55.702 --> 0:22:57.942
<v Speaker 2>no problems there, Like I liked it.

0:22:58.061 --> 0:23:01.502
<v Speaker 3>Before we move on, can I please have everyone's topline thoughts,

0:23:01.542 --> 0:23:03.341
<v Speaker 3>because there are gonna be people who did their homework.

0:23:03.381 --> 0:23:06.302
<v Speaker 3>We told them this weekend, your homework is to watch

0:23:06.381 --> 0:23:08.342
<v Speaker 3>Victoria Beckham. I'll be the first put my hand out

0:23:08.381 --> 0:23:10.461
<v Speaker 3>and go. I didn't complete the homework. I didn't. I

0:23:10.462 --> 0:23:13.981
<v Speaker 3>didn't get through episode three yet I will complain it.

0:23:14.061 --> 0:23:16.262
<v Speaker 4>Well, you'll never find out what happens with the fashion show.

0:23:16.742 --> 0:23:20.542
<v Speaker 4>I just love how the stakes of fashion and sports

0:23:20.542 --> 0:23:23.181
<v Speaker 4>documentaries they're both the same. It's like I get so

0:23:23.341 --> 0:23:26.141
<v Speaker 4>invested in things that actually don't matter very much, and

0:23:26.141 --> 0:23:26.821
<v Speaker 4>that's wonderful.

0:23:26.861 --> 0:23:29.221
<v Speaker 3>See I disagree that they're the same. A sports docko

0:23:29.502 --> 0:23:31.661
<v Speaker 3>I will get right into because I feel like the

0:23:31.702 --> 0:23:34.302
<v Speaker 3>stakes are simple as winning or losing. I felt like

0:23:34.341 --> 0:23:37.422
<v Speaker 3>I was watching an episode of Project Runway where it

0:23:37.462 --> 0:23:39.861
<v Speaker 3>was kind of like about Tim guhnn yes or like

0:23:39.942 --> 0:23:41.302
<v Speaker 3>will it rain, won't it rain? And I was like,

0:23:41.341 --> 0:23:43.542
<v Speaker 3>I'm not invested in that like that much in the rain.

0:23:44.302 --> 0:23:49.341
<v Speaker 3>And it was, as we predicted, such an explicit, prolonged

0:23:49.901 --> 0:23:52.422
<v Speaker 3>Victoria Beckham ad that at the end, I went, am

0:23:52.422 --> 0:23:55.621
<v Speaker 3>I more likely to go to Victoriabeckham dot com and

0:23:55.661 --> 0:23:57.581
<v Speaker 3>look at a nice frock? Perhaps?

0:23:57.821 --> 0:23:59.901
<v Speaker 4>I'm sure I wouldn't never aye you with a question

0:24:00.022 --> 0:24:02.222
<v Speaker 4>like do you think that it's going to drive people

0:24:02.262 --> 0:24:04.061
<v Speaker 4>to buy things with your name on them?

0:24:04.101 --> 0:24:07.262
<v Speaker 3>Because when you have created a brand, you want to

0:24:07.302 --> 0:24:10.141
<v Speaker 3>get your brand story out there. It's really cool to

0:24:10.222 --> 0:24:13.381
<v Speaker 3>kind of being front and center of people's purchasing decisions.

0:24:13.422 --> 0:24:15.381
<v Speaker 3>And this was just a brand story.

0:24:15.182 --> 0:24:17.742
<v Speaker 2>Except a brand's story was kind of and nobody bought

0:24:17.782 --> 0:24:19.421
<v Speaker 2>my clothes and I nearly went bust.

0:24:19.581 --> 0:24:21.341
<v Speaker 3>Oh, I think it was people bought them, but I

0:24:21.742 --> 0:24:25.262
<v Speaker 3>just spilled the money mentally the money on my plants.

0:24:25.821 --> 0:24:28.741
<v Speaker 3>I found it profoundly disappointing and it was full of

0:24:28.982 --> 0:24:33.222
<v Speaker 3>platitudes and cliches. And there was a point at which

0:24:33.262 --> 0:24:36.262
<v Speaker 3>she said this sentence that was like, I'm a control freak,

0:24:36.422 --> 0:24:38.661
<v Speaker 3>so when things aren't in my control, it's hard. And

0:24:38.702 --> 0:24:41.341
<v Speaker 3>I was like, I'm out I'm out, this is just

0:24:41.422 --> 0:24:42.022
<v Speaker 3>so boring.

0:24:42.302 --> 0:24:44.701
<v Speaker 2>I know that I'm the lone Vicky b defender in

0:24:44.742 --> 0:24:47.262
<v Speaker 2>this in this room. Because you're right, it wasn't great.

0:24:47.621 --> 0:24:51.061
<v Speaker 2>Particularly wasn't great in comparison to the Mecan documentary, which

0:24:51.222 --> 0:24:54.061
<v Speaker 2>was great in every way. It wasn't as deep. It

0:24:54.061 --> 0:24:56.742
<v Speaker 2>didn't interview that like he had every teammate he's ever had,

0:24:56.742 --> 0:24:58.621
<v Speaker 2>and we didn't even get the Spice girls like it.

0:24:59.502 --> 0:25:01.701
<v Speaker 2>It was very shallow in lots of ways. But in

0:25:01.742 --> 0:25:04.741
<v Speaker 2>a way, I think that's almost like appropriate for the

0:25:04.742 --> 0:25:08.021
<v Speaker 2>different ways we treat male and female celebrities, because this

0:25:08.182 --> 0:25:10.341
<v Speaker 2>was so buttoned up and so like, what will people say,

0:25:10.381 --> 0:25:12.302
<v Speaker 2>Oh my god, I've got it, Like, I know, I've

0:25:12.302 --> 0:25:14.061
<v Speaker 2>got to be authentic, but I don't want to be authentic.

0:25:14.061 --> 0:25:15.821
<v Speaker 2>I don't want to say anything that might be controversial,

0:25:15.821 --> 0:25:18.341
<v Speaker 2>so I'll just drop them like a tiny thing. Whereas

0:25:18.422 --> 0:25:20.901
<v Speaker 2>David was kind of like, well, you know, let it

0:25:20.942 --> 0:25:23.782
<v Speaker 2>all hang out. I think it's very gendered.

0:25:24.581 --> 0:25:26.902
<v Speaker 4>If this discussion has brought up any issues for you,

0:25:26.982 --> 0:25:29.061
<v Speaker 4>we will have some resources in the show notes.

0:25:30.702 --> 0:25:33.701
<v Speaker 3>In a moment, would you choose a female only section

0:25:33.942 --> 0:25:41.061
<v Speaker 3>on a flight if you could, we discuss Julia Morris,

0:25:41.101 --> 0:25:44.702
<v Speaker 3>who's a comedian and a TV host, best known for

0:25:44.821 --> 0:25:48.022
<v Speaker 3>hosting I'm a Celebrity, Get Me out of Here National Treasure. Yes,

0:25:48.302 --> 0:25:52.821
<v Speaker 3>she has a proposal. Over the weekend she posted this idea,

0:25:52.942 --> 0:25:55.741
<v Speaker 3>which is she thinks planes should have a women's only

0:25:55.901 --> 0:26:00.022
<v Speaker 3>section with women's only bathrooms. So here is exactly what

0:26:00.061 --> 0:26:03.941
<v Speaker 3>she posted. She wrote, calling all airlines please consider a

0:26:03.982 --> 0:26:07.181
<v Speaker 3>women only section on your planes. We don't feel safe

0:26:07.222 --> 0:26:09.502
<v Speaker 3>with men telling us to crawl over them on flight

0:26:09.942 --> 0:26:13.141
<v Speaker 3>while they ignore women's personal space. And I won't even

0:26:13.222 --> 0:26:15.901
<v Speaker 3>mention the state of the toilets. Not all men, but

0:26:15.942 --> 0:26:18.661
<v Speaker 3>why so many give us the back section or at

0:26:18.742 --> 0:26:22.501
<v Speaker 3>least a few rows of female only seats stand up

0:26:22.542 --> 0:26:26.861
<v Speaker 3>to creeps on flights. Women are over it and the

0:26:26.901 --> 0:26:30.341
<v Speaker 3>post attracted lots of likes, but more than sixteen hundred comments.

0:26:30.381 --> 0:26:34.221
<v Speaker 2>You think this was like a serious request to the airlights.

0:26:33.702 --> 0:26:34.581
<v Speaker 1>I actually do.

0:26:34.942 --> 0:26:37.821
<v Speaker 3>And it appears that maybe she had recently been on

0:26:37.861 --> 0:26:40.902
<v Speaker 3>a flight and had a particularly bad experience. But all

0:26:40.942 --> 0:26:43.422
<v Speaker 3>of these comments came floating in. I was really interested

0:26:43.422 --> 0:26:47.262
<v Speaker 3>to see what the consensus was, and generally it was

0:26:47.302 --> 0:26:52.462
<v Speaker 3>women sharing stories of being assaulted on flights, particularly by

0:26:52.581 --> 0:26:57.502
<v Speaker 3>men who were inebriated, men making women crawl over them

0:26:57.661 --> 0:26:59.422
<v Speaker 3>and then kind of making them feel like they didn't

0:26:59.462 --> 0:27:03.221
<v Speaker 3>have their own personal space. And also women being in

0:27:03.222 --> 0:27:04.781
<v Speaker 3>a position where they had to breastfeed and they were

0:27:04.982 --> 0:27:09.022
<v Speaker 3>sandwiched between two men and they felt uncomfortable. I remember

0:27:09.061 --> 0:27:12.662
<v Speaker 3>last year talked about an Indian low cost carrier named

0:27:12.702 --> 0:27:18.102
<v Speaker 3>Indigo who had just offered a service where female passengers

0:27:18.141 --> 0:27:20.701
<v Speaker 3>could select a seat where they could sit next to

0:27:20.742 --> 0:27:23.022
<v Speaker 3>another female passenger, so you could see it when you

0:27:23.141 --> 0:27:24.901
<v Speaker 3>checked in and you chose your seat, you could go,

0:27:24.942 --> 0:27:26.701
<v Speaker 3>I want to sit next to a woman, And that

0:27:26.901 --> 0:27:31.901
<v Speaker 3>was about comfort and safety of women on flights. I

0:27:31.942 --> 0:27:34.422
<v Speaker 3>am so interested to hear what you think. I've gone

0:27:34.462 --> 0:27:36.941
<v Speaker 3>back and forth on it, Amelia, what do you reckon?

0:27:37.381 --> 0:27:39.502
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? I think it's a really interesting proposal.

0:27:39.542 --> 0:27:42.021
<v Speaker 4>And I think that women's only spaces kind of go

0:27:42.141 --> 0:27:45.022
<v Speaker 4>in and out of fashion, depending on maybe the political

0:27:45.022 --> 0:27:48.622
<v Speaker 4>climate at the times. Because back in the nineties, when

0:27:48.661 --> 0:27:51.742
<v Speaker 4>I was about to go to university, my mom told

0:27:51.782 --> 0:27:54.262
<v Speaker 4>me that when she was at Sydney University in the sixties,

0:27:54.621 --> 0:27:58.182
<v Speaker 4>they had a women's only room and she would spend

0:27:58.222 --> 0:28:01.902
<v Speaker 4>a lot of time there. And my reaction in the nineties,

0:28:01.942 --> 0:28:05.941
<v Speaker 4>growing up amidst lad culture, amidst Victoria Beckham being weighed

0:28:05.942 --> 0:28:10.502
<v Speaker 4>on national television. Was immediately like, that's uncle, Why would

0:28:10.581 --> 0:28:12.782
<v Speaker 4>I strike out on my own and go where only

0:28:12.821 --> 0:28:15.221
<v Speaker 4>the women are? Because back then it was seen as

0:28:15.381 --> 0:28:18.141
<v Speaker 4>you had to be able to hang with men, and

0:28:18.182 --> 0:28:19.861
<v Speaker 4>you had to be able to be comfortable in the

0:28:19.901 --> 0:28:22.861
<v Speaker 4>company of men and not talk too loudly about being

0:28:22.861 --> 0:28:25.661
<v Speaker 4>a feminist or wanting to be with other women. And

0:28:25.742 --> 0:28:27.981
<v Speaker 4>also the nineties, I remember that I watched a travel

0:28:27.982 --> 0:28:30.742
<v Speaker 4>show about Tokyo. It was a Clive James travel show,

0:28:30.782 --> 0:28:33.061
<v Speaker 4>and he talked about how on the Tokyo subway there

0:28:33.061 --> 0:28:36.341
<v Speaker 4>are women only cars on the subway. And this blew

0:28:36.381 --> 0:28:39.462
<v Speaker 4>my nineties mind because back then again there just wasn't

0:28:39.462 --> 0:28:42.542
<v Speaker 4>this acceptance of the need for women only spaces for

0:28:42.582 --> 0:28:44.261
<v Speaker 4>all these sort of big cultural reasons.

0:28:44.302 --> 0:28:46.822
<v Speaker 2>Are are there still women's only cars on the subway?

0:28:46.822 --> 0:28:47.982
<v Speaker 2>And there are? Yes.

0:28:48.462 --> 0:28:51.102
<v Speaker 4>Another harbinger of the times was you know the Kuldjie

0:28:51.142 --> 0:28:53.862
<v Speaker 4>Ladies bards there in Sydney, and they're very beautiful and

0:28:53.902 --> 0:28:56.262
<v Speaker 4>they've been a sanctuary for women for over a century.

0:28:56.661 --> 0:28:59.822
<v Speaker 4>In nineteen ninety five, a man launched proceedings of the

0:28:59.822 --> 0:29:02.742
<v Speaker 4>New South Wales Anti Discrimination Board, saying that he wanted

0:29:02.742 --> 0:29:04.502
<v Speaker 4>to be able to go to the ladies' bards. Now

0:29:04.502 --> 0:29:07.142
<v Speaker 4>he lost the case, but it's a sign of how

0:29:07.222 --> 0:29:09.742
<v Speaker 4>there really was this backlash then against this same fear

0:29:09.782 --> 0:29:11.661
<v Speaker 4>of women being able to have their own space.

0:29:12.142 --> 0:29:12.941
<v Speaker 1>And now I think.

0:29:12.822 --> 0:29:15.022
<v Speaker 4>We've come one to eighty and now I think we're

0:29:15.062 --> 0:29:18.102
<v Speaker 4>really wanting to create spaces for women. Women are two

0:29:18.142 --> 0:29:21.221
<v Speaker 4>thirds of global travelers. There's been a rise in women's

0:29:21.222 --> 0:29:23.382
<v Speaker 4>only trips and holidays and things like that, and I

0:29:23.382 --> 0:29:26.582
<v Speaker 4>think we're more aware now of like the psychological safety

0:29:26.622 --> 0:29:28.822
<v Speaker 4>that can be brought about by being around other women.

0:29:29.222 --> 0:29:35.142
<v Speaker 2>Yes, cosign all that, but is there also a point

0:29:35.222 --> 0:29:37.262
<v Speaker 2>here at which and I want to preface this that

0:29:37.422 --> 0:29:41.102
<v Speaker 2>obviously the story's there about being groped or you know,

0:29:41.982 --> 0:29:44.462
<v Speaker 2>made to feel unsafe in a physical way because some

0:29:44.902 --> 0:29:48.022
<v Speaker 2>creepy guy basically is sitting next to you. Is there

0:29:48.022 --> 0:29:50.902
<v Speaker 2>also a place here where we've just become completely intolerant

0:29:51.062 --> 0:29:55.022
<v Speaker 2>of being around the people who may behave in ways

0:29:55.022 --> 0:29:56.982
<v Speaker 2>that we don't like. Like, you know, we've often talked

0:29:57.022 --> 0:29:59.542
<v Speaker 2>about when we're traveling lots for Mom and mere out

0:29:59.542 --> 0:30:02.221
<v Speaker 2>loud and we're flying all the time. We often complain

0:30:02.342 --> 0:30:04.942
<v Speaker 2>or laugh about like that guy who felt entitled enough

0:30:04.982 --> 0:30:09.182
<v Speaker 2>to snore or spread his legs too wide or talk

0:30:09.262 --> 0:30:12.382
<v Speaker 2>to loudly or whatever. And there is a point at

0:30:12.422 --> 0:30:15.102
<v Speaker 2>which we do just have to all rub along, right.

0:30:15.102 --> 0:30:15.982
<v Speaker 1>We do. But it's funny.

0:30:15.982 --> 0:30:18.982
<v Speaker 4>You should imagine the tour because one of the people

0:30:19.022 --> 0:30:21.502
<v Speaker 4>who works with us on the tour mentioned that she

0:30:21.822 --> 0:30:23.862
<v Speaker 4>was on a plane going to one of the shows

0:30:23.942 --> 0:30:27.661
<v Speaker 4>and a man was looking at hardcore pornography next to her.

0:30:27.862 --> 0:30:29.462
<v Speaker 1>See, that is not exactly okay.

0:30:29.502 --> 0:30:32.062
<v Speaker 2>But you know, I'm not normally the hashtag not all men.

0:30:32.102 --> 0:30:34.461
<v Speaker 2>But I just think I'm generally in favor of a

0:30:34.462 --> 0:30:36.701
<v Speaker 2>co ed world. I think we're all better if we

0:30:36.822 --> 0:30:38.942
<v Speaker 2>learn to figure out how to hang around with each other.

0:30:39.342 --> 0:30:42.342
<v Speaker 2>So I don't really like the idea of gender segregating

0:30:42.342 --> 0:30:45.342
<v Speaker 2>all public spaces. I think that any kind of criminal

0:30:45.422 --> 0:30:47.542
<v Speaker 2>or creepy behavior should be punished. But like if I

0:30:47.582 --> 0:30:49.862
<v Speaker 2>could sit in a woman's only section on a plane,

0:30:49.902 --> 0:30:52.262
<v Speaker 2>I would not. There's no way I would, because you'll

0:30:52.302 --> 0:30:55.742
<v Speaker 2>tell you why. It's where the babies would be. If

0:30:55.782 --> 0:30:59.781
<v Speaker 2>they put a women's only section on a plane, that

0:30:59.942 --> 0:31:02.502
<v Speaker 2>is where all the children would go. And although I

0:31:02.542 --> 0:31:04.822
<v Speaker 2>am very because that's just the way the world works

0:31:04.822 --> 0:31:06.982
<v Speaker 2>and it shouldn't be, but it is. And I am

0:31:07.102 --> 0:31:09.421
<v Speaker 2>very tolerant of babies and toddlers on planes because I've been,

0:31:09.702 --> 0:31:11.302
<v Speaker 2>but I'm not there anymore and I do not want

0:31:11.342 --> 0:31:14.102
<v Speaker 2>to see and so the men would be loving it.

0:31:14.262 --> 0:31:16.382
<v Speaker 2>And also the way that Julia suggested it is that

0:31:16.382 --> 0:31:18.382
<v Speaker 2>the women are at the back. I'm like, no, thanks,

0:31:18.422 --> 0:31:20.221
<v Speaker 2>I want to be at the front as close to

0:31:20.262 --> 0:31:21.702
<v Speaker 2>the front as humanly possible.

0:31:21.782 --> 0:31:23.342
<v Speaker 1>No, but that's for all the businessmen.

0:31:24.502 --> 0:31:26.661
<v Speaker 2>I don't think so, so I you know, I have

0:31:26.702 --> 0:31:28.822
<v Speaker 2>a lot of sympathy for any woman who's experienced that

0:31:28.822 --> 0:31:31.062
<v Speaker 2>creepy behavior. And I did once to do fourteen hours

0:31:31.462 --> 0:31:33.982
<v Speaker 2>on a long haul to England with the first leg

0:31:34.222 --> 0:31:38.181
<v Speaker 2>sitting next to two enormous bodybuilders like they were so

0:31:38.462 --> 0:31:41.342
<v Speaker 2>enormously's bodybuilder guys with these really big muscly thighs, and

0:31:41.382 --> 0:31:43.422
<v Speaker 2>they sat with their leg light and it was not comfy.

0:31:43.462 --> 0:31:47.582
<v Speaker 2>But I don't think I would choose a women's only section.

0:31:47.582 --> 0:31:49.421
<v Speaker 3>Growing up in the nineties. I wonder if that is

0:31:49.502 --> 0:31:53.542
<v Speaker 3>part of why I bristle a little bit at gender segregation,

0:31:54.182 --> 0:31:58.461
<v Speaker 3>and maybe I feel as though it's also why do

0:31:58.542 --> 0:32:04.942
<v Speaker 3>we need a women's space to allow for men's criminal behavior?

0:32:05.422 --> 0:32:08.022
<v Speaker 3>Behavior Like if I have sat on a long haul

0:32:08.062 --> 0:32:11.462
<v Speaker 3>flight next to a man who did very intimate things

0:32:11.462 --> 0:32:15.501
<v Speaker 3>to himself on that fly, and I was stuck by

0:32:15.542 --> 0:32:18.382
<v Speaker 3>the window, so my only option was to have crawled

0:32:18.422 --> 0:32:21.422
<v Speaker 3>over him to what And it's the same with our

0:32:21.502 --> 0:32:23.902
<v Speaker 3>member of our team who saw what was on his phone.

0:32:24.022 --> 0:32:25.662
<v Speaker 3>You often sit there and you go.

0:32:25.462 --> 0:32:26.782
<v Speaker 2>Well, I don't know if this is a crime.

0:32:27.022 --> 0:32:28.902
<v Speaker 3>I just don't like it. Maybe it was I was

0:32:28.942 --> 0:32:30.862
<v Speaker 3>a young girl at the time. What am I going

0:32:30.942 --> 0:32:33.822
<v Speaker 3>to do? I'm quite literally trapped.

0:32:34.142 --> 0:32:36.862
<v Speaker 2>And also you were also thinking if a man is

0:32:36.902 --> 0:32:40.142
<v Speaker 2>prepared to either watch hardcore porn in a public space

0:32:40.342 --> 0:32:44.902
<v Speaker 2>or be with him, yeah, in a public space, then

0:32:44.942 --> 0:32:48.262
<v Speaker 2>this is not necessarily a man I'm going to confront, yes, and.

0:32:48.182 --> 0:32:50.461
<v Speaker 3>A lot of I found a Reddit thread discussing this,

0:32:50.661 --> 0:32:53.421
<v Speaker 3>and it was someone asking cabin crew, and a lot

0:32:53.502 --> 0:32:56.382
<v Speaker 3>of the cabin crew said, for the amount of flights

0:32:56.382 --> 0:32:57.982
<v Speaker 3>we do, we do not get a lot of reports.

0:32:58.022 --> 0:33:01.022
<v Speaker 3>And I thought that means very little because I didn't

0:33:01.022 --> 0:33:02.902
<v Speaker 3>say anything, our team member didn't say anything. Of course,

0:33:02.902 --> 0:33:05.941
<v Speaker 3>they didn't like what you just often don't you just

0:33:06.022 --> 0:33:08.542
<v Speaker 3>put up with it. And there's stories in this of

0:33:08.582 --> 0:33:10.941
<v Speaker 3>women falling asleep and they've woken up and the person

0:33:10.982 --> 0:33:12.822
<v Speaker 3>next to them is being creepy and it's awful. With

0:33:12.942 --> 0:33:16.502
<v Speaker 3>all of that said, I think that if that occurs,

0:33:16.542 --> 0:33:19.822
<v Speaker 3>I would prefer to live in a world where those

0:33:20.382 --> 0:33:24.782
<v Speaker 3>men are punished and banned from airlines than a world

0:33:24.902 --> 0:33:30.822
<v Speaker 3>in which we exist in different parts of the plane

0:33:31.462 --> 0:33:34.741
<v Speaker 3>because we do not trust men to sit beside a

0:33:34.742 --> 0:33:35.862
<v Speaker 3>woman for a long period of time.

0:33:35.902 --> 0:33:38.022
<v Speaker 2>You know where my hypocrisy comes here. Actually, you know

0:33:38.102 --> 0:33:40.102
<v Speaker 2>I'm saying, Oh, I wouldn't. If I was booking a

0:33:40.102 --> 0:33:42.742
<v Speaker 2>flight for my fifteen year old daughter and I had

0:33:42.742 --> 0:33:45.262
<v Speaker 2>that option, I probably would take the option of having

0:33:45.302 --> 0:33:47.461
<v Speaker 2>her sit next to a woman. So there is hypocrisy

0:33:47.462 --> 0:33:48.221
<v Speaker 2>in what I'm saying.

0:33:48.382 --> 0:33:51.462
<v Speaker 4>I don't think it's about crime, because Jesse, I take

0:33:51.502 --> 0:33:54.182
<v Speaker 4>your point like, if someone is doing a criminal activity,

0:33:54.182 --> 0:33:57.462
<v Speaker 4>they should be arrested for it. I think it's about comfort,

0:33:57.502 --> 0:33:59.982
<v Speaker 4>and I think it's okay to want a more comforting

0:34:00.302 --> 0:34:04.981
<v Speaker 4>experience in the very dehumanizing experience which is modern airline travel.

0:34:05.062 --> 0:34:06.662
<v Speaker 4>Let me give you an example from my own life,

0:34:06.661 --> 0:34:08.622
<v Speaker 4>which is one time I was on the New York Subway,

0:34:08.661 --> 0:34:12.502
<v Speaker 4>which most definitely does not have women only cars, and

0:34:12.702 --> 0:34:15.062
<v Speaker 4>I was very comfortable on the subway and it was

0:34:15.062 --> 0:34:17.502
<v Speaker 4>sort of my happy place. Actually, I love public transport

0:34:17.542 --> 0:34:19.462
<v Speaker 4>because I feel like it's very anonymous and you can

0:34:19.582 --> 0:34:21.982
<v Speaker 4>zone out and think about your life, and people an

0:34:21.982 --> 0:34:25.102
<v Speaker 4>opportunity to read. People watch, well, people watch, interesting choice

0:34:25.142 --> 0:34:28.462
<v Speaker 4>of phrase. So I was sitting there, probably reading my

0:34:28.542 --> 0:34:30.781
<v Speaker 4>phone or a magazine because it's a few years ago.

0:34:31.422 --> 0:34:33.582
<v Speaker 1>And just as I got up to get off the.

0:34:33.582 --> 0:34:36.502
<v Speaker 4>Train, a man came up to me and he said,

0:34:36.781 --> 0:34:39.181
<v Speaker 4>you should know that that man over there has been

0:34:39.302 --> 0:34:43.221
<v Speaker 4>drawing your legs. Oh no, but it wasn't in a

0:34:43.261 --> 0:34:43.622
<v Speaker 4>good way.

0:34:43.701 --> 0:34:45.221
<v Speaker 2>No, No, I didn't mean they are in a good

0:34:45.261 --> 0:34:51.982
<v Speaker 2>ways an artists like like more like.

0:34:52.781 --> 0:34:55.422
<v Speaker 4>I was flaunching my pins, I was wearying like my

0:34:55.582 --> 0:34:59.982
<v Speaker 4>office attire. It wasn't anything risky and see the drawing.

0:35:00.102 --> 0:35:03.661
<v Speaker 4>I didn't see the drawing, but I was really unsettled. Now,

0:35:03.701 --> 0:35:07.661
<v Speaker 4>it is definitely not illegal to draw someone's legs. But

0:35:07.862 --> 0:35:10.502
<v Speaker 4>would I have preferred that that was not happening while

0:35:10.502 --> 0:35:13.221
<v Speaker 4>I was in my happy place? Yes, yes they would have.

0:35:13.342 --> 0:35:15.261
<v Speaker 3>And that's the thing is that it might be one

0:35:15.302 --> 0:35:18.302
<v Speaker 3>incident in a thousand, but it changes the way you travel.

0:35:18.542 --> 0:35:19.821
<v Speaker 3>It changes the way and the.

0:35:19.781 --> 0:35:21.382
<v Speaker 4>Next time I got on the subway and I was

0:35:21.422 --> 0:35:23.822
<v Speaker 4>wearing a dress, I was just a little bit conscious

0:35:23.862 --> 0:35:26.342
<v Speaker 4>of picking a seat that was maybe slightly less visible

0:35:26.382 --> 0:35:27.502
<v Speaker 4>to the rest of the train car.

0:35:27.822 --> 0:35:30.102
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and I suppose it's a good point, right, because

0:35:30.102 --> 0:35:34.422
<v Speaker 3>there's criminal activity, But then there is just the general

0:35:34.781 --> 0:35:39.261
<v Speaker 3>degradation of airline travel. So for example, the crawling over

0:35:39.302 --> 0:35:41.982
<v Speaker 3>someone and having them not move. I was trying to

0:35:41.982 --> 0:35:44.301
<v Speaker 3>be really honest with myself and I went, I've had

0:35:44.382 --> 0:35:47.422
<v Speaker 3>as many women not get up from their seat and

0:35:47.502 --> 0:35:49.222
<v Speaker 3>have me crawl over them to get to the aisle

0:35:49.302 --> 0:35:53.022
<v Speaker 3>as I have men. Do I think men leave dirtier bathrooms. No,

0:35:53.382 --> 0:35:56.181
<v Speaker 3>I think that women leave real dirty bathrooms as well.

0:35:56.261 --> 0:35:57.942
<v Speaker 2>It is a bit of a stereotype that if the

0:35:57.982 --> 0:35:59.821
<v Speaker 2>plane was full of women, it would be so neat

0:35:59.822 --> 0:36:00.342
<v Speaker 2>and tidy.

0:36:00.701 --> 0:36:02.622
<v Speaker 3>I think it's one thing, and I always think that

0:36:02.661 --> 0:36:07.062
<v Speaker 3>we should extend a particular like a sensitivity to anyone

0:36:07.142 --> 0:36:11.422
<v Speaker 3>who's had seriously traumatizing experience. It's where you go. I

0:36:11.462 --> 0:36:13.382
<v Speaker 3>don't like the idea that then you sit next to

0:36:13.701 --> 0:36:16.221
<v Speaker 3>two men and you feel threatened or unsafe for fourteen hours.

0:36:16.261 --> 0:36:20.181
<v Speaker 3>I don't like that, but generally speaking, I just go oh.

0:36:20.542 --> 0:36:23.301
<v Speaker 3>I was looking around a cafe today and I was like, well,

0:36:23.462 --> 0:36:25.462
<v Speaker 3>I like the mixed I like the co ed of

0:36:25.462 --> 0:36:27.942
<v Speaker 3>it all, and I think that having a standard for

0:36:28.022 --> 0:36:31.701
<v Speaker 3>how we all behave like human beings should just be

0:36:32.181 --> 0:36:32.902
<v Speaker 3>widely accepted.

0:36:33.022 --> 0:36:35.301
<v Speaker 2>I want to hear from out louders. I don't necessarily

0:36:35.342 --> 0:36:37.102
<v Speaker 2>want to hear all the plane horror stories because it

0:36:37.142 --> 0:36:39.502
<v Speaker 2>might definitely maybe change my mind, but I want to

0:36:39.542 --> 0:36:41.781
<v Speaker 2>know what you think. Do you think we should have

0:36:41.822 --> 0:36:46.502
<v Speaker 2>women's only areas on aeroplanes? I have excellent news for

0:36:46.582 --> 0:36:52.142
<v Speaker 2>type bees and lazy girls. Oh hello, that's me. No,

0:36:52.462 --> 0:36:55.462
<v Speaker 2>you do not have to make your bed first thing

0:36:55.582 --> 0:36:59.022
<v Speaker 2>in the morning to have a clear, productive day. In fact,

0:36:59.102 --> 0:37:01.622
<v Speaker 2>you shouldn't, Jesse, isn't this one of the Jordan Peterson's

0:37:01.622 --> 0:37:03.221
<v Speaker 2>twelve for all belove you men to get out of

0:37:03.261 --> 0:37:04.422
<v Speaker 2>bed and immediately make it.

0:37:04.582 --> 0:37:06.821
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so read any self help. I'm pretty sure it's

0:37:06.822 --> 0:37:11.142
<v Speaker 3>also Atomic habits. James Clear, it's any person who's told

0:37:11.142 --> 0:37:13.301
<v Speaker 3>you how to live your life. Chapter one is make

0:37:13.342 --> 0:37:13.661
<v Speaker 3>your bed?

0:37:13.741 --> 0:37:13.981
<v Speaker 2>Holy?

0:37:14.181 --> 0:37:16.982
<v Speaker 1>Do you have a Google news for this? Topic, do

0:37:17.142 --> 0:37:18.261
<v Speaker 1>not make bed.

0:37:19.622 --> 0:37:24.181
<v Speaker 2>Because I read so excited about you know why? Well,

0:37:24.221 --> 0:37:26.422
<v Speaker 2>I'll tell you what the truth what I'm talking about,

0:37:26.422 --> 0:37:28.382
<v Speaker 2>and then I'll tell you why make you excited?

0:37:28.542 --> 0:37:29.502
<v Speaker 5>Right is?

0:37:29.542 --> 0:37:32.301
<v Speaker 2>I read a piece in the UK Telegraph this week

0:37:32.302 --> 0:37:33.941
<v Speaker 2>that was kind of like it was one of those

0:37:33.982 --> 0:37:38.182
<v Speaker 2>twelve domestic myths that we must dispel right and London

0:37:38.221 --> 0:37:43.181
<v Speaker 2>based GP dr amos Ockencoa says that you shouldn't because

0:37:43.582 --> 0:37:46.221
<v Speaker 2>when you sleep, you build up moisture and sweat. And

0:37:46.302 --> 0:37:49.902
<v Speaker 2>this is even in London, right stop form there. This warm,

0:37:50.022 --> 0:37:54.062
<v Speaker 2>humid environment is the perfect breeding ground for microscopic dust mite.

0:37:54.102 --> 0:37:58.341
<v Speaker 2>I've always said this, yea. And so Lindsey Crombie, who's

0:37:58.342 --> 0:38:01.142
<v Speaker 2>a home expert and author of the Fifteen Minute Clean, says,

0:38:01.181 --> 0:38:04.821
<v Speaker 2>your best bet is to leave the bed unmade for

0:38:04.862 --> 0:38:08.701
<v Speaker 2>an hour or two or ten or ten so that

0:38:08.781 --> 0:38:12.102
<v Speaker 2>it can air out naturally. You can obviously open a

0:38:12.102 --> 0:38:14.301
<v Speaker 2>window or whatever fresh air. But the point that what

0:38:14.422 --> 0:38:17.822
<v Speaker 2>I seized onto with delight was the idea of leaving

0:38:17.862 --> 0:38:21.261
<v Speaker 2>your bed all mussied up and open like an open bed.

0:38:21.422 --> 0:38:22.461
<v Speaker 3>The germs need to fly away.

0:38:22.502 --> 0:38:24.661
<v Speaker 1>Everyone knows that need to.

0:38:24.741 --> 0:38:28.142
<v Speaker 2>Fly away as they clean. Air needs to come in

0:38:28.261 --> 0:38:30.062
<v Speaker 2>and do. It's wishy washy, wishy washy.

0:38:30.502 --> 0:38:35.142
<v Speaker 4>Clear, They're not flying away, they're dehydrating and dying.

0:38:35.462 --> 0:38:37.142
<v Speaker 1>WoT someone think about the dust.

0:38:37.261 --> 0:38:38.261
<v Speaker 2>And I don't have to fight.

0:38:38.382 --> 0:38:40.102
<v Speaker 3>You don't even have to clean your sheets, is what

0:38:40.142 --> 0:38:40.422
<v Speaker 3>I hear.

0:38:40.582 --> 0:38:42.861
<v Speaker 4>Let's just be clear that by not making your bed,

0:38:43.142 --> 0:38:45.502
<v Speaker 4>you are leaving these dust whites to die.

0:38:46.302 --> 0:38:50.381
<v Speaker 2>I can live with that. I can't extend empathy to dust.

0:38:50.622 --> 0:38:53.062
<v Speaker 2>I mean, what even faces the dust mites have do

0:38:53.142 --> 0:38:56.501
<v Speaker 2>they make little sad flash leave them to shrivel in it? Anyway,

0:38:56.942 --> 0:38:59.542
<v Speaker 2>Although I do make my bed because I kind of

0:38:59.542 --> 0:39:01.862
<v Speaker 2>have to, because I've read all these things, I never

0:39:01.942 --> 0:39:04.622
<v Speaker 2>ever did. Obviously wasn't brought up to right, I've just

0:39:04.701 --> 0:39:06.542
<v Speaker 2>been brought up with with a douna as we call

0:39:06.582 --> 0:39:09.142
<v Speaker 2>them in Australia, a douvet as we call them in England.

0:39:09.902 --> 0:39:11.582
<v Speaker 2>I just used to get out of bed and whatever

0:39:11.622 --> 0:39:13.341
<v Speaker 2>state it was in, I just walk away from it.

0:39:13.422 --> 0:39:15.661
<v Speaker 2>And then I had a boyfriend, right. I had a

0:39:15.661 --> 0:39:18.582
<v Speaker 2>boyfriend in my late twenties who was what we may

0:39:18.661 --> 0:39:22.221
<v Speaker 2>call a clean freak, but maybe he was just ornmic

0:39:23.142 --> 0:39:26.022
<v Speaker 2>and he was obsessed with it. He was also obsessed

0:39:26.022 --> 0:39:27.701
<v Speaker 2>with when he took off his clothes when he got home,

0:39:27.741 --> 0:39:30.142
<v Speaker 2>no matter what state of excitement you were in, he

0:39:30.181 --> 0:39:33.861
<v Speaker 2>had to fold them up and put them. But he

0:39:33.942 --> 0:39:36.661
<v Speaker 2>was a lovely guy, but he was obsessed with making

0:39:36.661 --> 0:39:38.741
<v Speaker 2>the bed. And he said to me, you know, your

0:39:38.781 --> 0:39:40.661
<v Speaker 2>mind is messy if your bed is messy. All that

0:39:40.701 --> 0:39:42.661
<v Speaker 2>stuff that you read, and I took it in so

0:39:42.701 --> 0:39:44.461
<v Speaker 2>I do make my bed. But when I read this,

0:39:44.982 --> 0:39:45.821
<v Speaker 2>little twenty eight.

0:39:45.741 --> 0:39:50.461
<v Speaker 3>Year old me was like, yeah, that do you think

0:39:50.502 --> 0:39:54.022
<v Speaker 3>making the bed is the patriarchy? Because I also never

0:39:54.062 --> 0:39:56.822
<v Speaker 3>made my bed. It's an instinct. It's in my DNA.

0:39:57.142 --> 0:39:57.782
<v Speaker 3>I just don't.

0:39:57.902 --> 0:40:00.462
<v Speaker 4>And is that out of concern for reducing the humidity

0:40:00.502 --> 0:40:01.982
<v Speaker 4>in the room and leaving the dust work?

0:40:02.062 --> 0:40:04.582
<v Speaker 3>Yes, letting them fly away. It's always been critical to

0:40:04.622 --> 0:40:06.942
<v Speaker 3>my understanding of my own I don't have we do.

0:40:06.982 --> 0:40:11.341
<v Speaker 2>We need to dispel this myth, very concerned about the

0:40:11.382 --> 0:40:12.741
<v Speaker 2>fact basically.

0:40:12.701 --> 0:40:15.422
<v Speaker 4>You were thinking of my little butterflies leaving your bed.

0:40:15.542 --> 0:40:16.742
<v Speaker 1>That's not what's happening.

0:40:17.422 --> 0:40:21.301
<v Speaker 3>I like that imagery. And then I met an absolute

0:40:21.822 --> 0:40:25.821
<v Speaker 3>make your bed guy. And the oppression of making your

0:40:25.862 --> 0:40:28.301
<v Speaker 3>bed is that the last person out of bed must

0:40:28.382 --> 0:40:30.421
<v Speaker 3>make it. And I happen to be about every single day,

0:40:31.022 --> 0:40:33.462
<v Speaker 3>so the bed has to get made. I have to

0:40:33.462 --> 0:40:35.982
<v Speaker 3>do it. I resent it, and when he's away or something,

0:40:35.982 --> 0:40:37.822
<v Speaker 3>I don't make the bed, and guess what, my life's

0:40:37.822 --> 0:40:40.462
<v Speaker 3>exactly the same copaganda, but it actually doesn't make my

0:40:40.502 --> 0:40:42.781
<v Speaker 3>life better. Don't make the bed. Do you enjoy making

0:40:42.822 --> 0:40:43.582
<v Speaker 3>your bed, Amelia?

0:40:43.781 --> 0:40:45.622
<v Speaker 1>I do. I love making my bed.

0:40:45.661 --> 0:40:46.942
<v Speaker 2>Are you a many cushions person?

0:40:47.181 --> 0:40:50.662
<v Speaker 4>Yes, but you know, if you're in a heterosexual relationship

0:40:50.701 --> 0:40:53.941
<v Speaker 4>with a man, sometimes the pillows you have to minimize them.

0:40:54.181 --> 0:40:56.741
<v Speaker 1>I find the anger men not all they do.

0:40:57.221 --> 0:40:59.422
<v Speaker 3>Yes, women, but it's also like you have to explain

0:40:59.462 --> 0:41:01.022
<v Speaker 3>the pillows, and it just gets to the point where

0:41:01.022 --> 0:41:01.341
<v Speaker 3>it's like.

0:41:01.302 --> 0:41:02.661
<v Speaker 2>The women's area of the play.

0:41:03.902 --> 0:41:07.942
<v Speaker 4>Oh my god, that's actually a big problem.

0:41:08.181 --> 0:41:10.661
<v Speaker 2>After the break, Princess Kate has just told us all

0:41:10.701 --> 0:41:13.542
<v Speaker 2>off about using our phones around the kids, and we're

0:41:13.622 --> 0:41:16.221
<v Speaker 2>unpacking where the mobile phones are soon going.

0:41:16.181 --> 0:41:19.942
<v Speaker 3>To be the new smoking one unlimited out loud access.

0:41:20.181 --> 0:41:24.341
<v Speaker 3>We drop episodes every Tuesday and Thursday exclusively for Mum

0:41:24.342 --> 0:41:27.342
<v Speaker 3>and Maya subscribers. Follow the link in the show notes

0:41:27.382 --> 0:41:29.822
<v Speaker 3>to get us in your ears five days a week,

0:41:29.982 --> 0:41:32.261
<v Speaker 3>and a huge thank you to all our current.

0:41:32.062 --> 0:41:40.142
<v Speaker 2>Subscribers, Friends, I was seduced by a headline today on

0:41:40.181 --> 0:41:43.381
<v Speaker 2>the Internet. Earlier on I was seduced by some bad preparatives.

0:41:44.542 --> 0:41:47.822
<v Speaker 2>Then I was seduced by a headline Kate Middleton explains

0:41:47.822 --> 0:41:50.661
<v Speaker 2>a house rule, no phones for the kids. Now, you

0:41:50.701 --> 0:41:53.342
<v Speaker 2>know me, any excuse to peer through the palace windows?

0:41:53.661 --> 0:41:56.422
<v Speaker 2>I am in, I am there binoculars on.

0:41:56.582 --> 0:42:00.982
<v Speaker 3>Can I also just flag her eldest child is twelve?

0:42:01.181 --> 0:42:03.422
<v Speaker 3>And I just think every parent with a child older

0:42:03.462 --> 0:42:06.222
<v Speaker 3>than twelve is going, yeah, yeah, yeah, you got to twelve.

0:42:06.261 --> 0:42:09.181
<v Speaker 3>You wait, just you wait, Kate.

0:42:09.102 --> 0:42:11.221
<v Speaker 2>What happen when you click on that headline as you

0:42:11.261 --> 0:42:14.221
<v Speaker 2>go to an essay like a whole essay right called

0:42:14.302 --> 0:42:17.261
<v Speaker 2>the Power of Human Connection in a Distracted World, which

0:42:17.261 --> 0:42:19.821
<v Speaker 2>sounds very high for Luton. It is written by Her

0:42:19.942 --> 0:42:22.862
<v Speaker 2>Royal Highness, the Princess of Wells, in collaboration with Professor

0:42:23.102 --> 0:42:26.221
<v Speaker 2>Robert Waldinger. And it's all about, and this is not

0:42:26.382 --> 0:42:28.741
<v Speaker 2>news to anyone who lives in the world, the fact

0:42:28.781 --> 0:42:31.341
<v Speaker 2>that phones are screwing our attention and that when it

0:42:31.382 --> 0:42:34.262
<v Speaker 2>comes to parents and kids and building a connection between

0:42:34.462 --> 0:42:38.542
<v Speaker 2>little kids and their caregivers, phones are breaking that connection

0:42:38.741 --> 0:42:42.421
<v Speaker 2>and making sick unhappy, anxious children. We have been being

0:42:42.462 --> 0:42:44.701
<v Speaker 2>told this everywhere we look for a while. Now, she

0:42:44.781 --> 0:42:48.381
<v Speaker 2>writes in this article, our undivided attention is the most

0:42:48.422 --> 0:42:51.741
<v Speaker 2>precious gift we can give another person, Yet increasingly it's

0:42:51.781 --> 0:42:54.542
<v Speaker 2>the most difficult gift to offer when we check our

0:42:54.582 --> 0:42:58.782
<v Speaker 2>phones during conversations, scroll through social media during family dinners.

0:42:58.862 --> 0:43:00.341
<v Speaker 2>I was like, I don't do that, and I got

0:43:00.342 --> 0:43:02.701
<v Speaker 2>to feel really smug for two minutes. But then or

0:43:02.781 --> 0:43:05.701
<v Speaker 2>respond to emails while playing with our children. Damn it.

0:43:06.622 --> 0:43:09.942
<v Speaker 2>We're not just being distracted. We are withdrawing ding the

0:43:09.942 --> 0:43:13.542
<v Speaker 2>basic form of love that human connection requires. Now that

0:43:13.661 --> 0:43:16.941
<v Speaker 2>bit with drawing the basic form of love that human

0:43:16.982 --> 0:43:21.022
<v Speaker 2>connection requires really hit me in the guts. Do you

0:43:21.062 --> 0:43:22.821
<v Speaker 2>want me to explain why Kate's writing this or or

0:43:22.862 --> 0:43:24.341
<v Speaker 2>do we just want to go straight into how we

0:43:24.382 --> 0:43:25.022
<v Speaker 2>feel about this?

0:43:25.142 --> 0:43:26.462
<v Speaker 3>I think our feelings are more important.

0:43:26.502 --> 0:43:29.542
<v Speaker 2>Okay, feelings first, okay, and I'll explain what the strategy

0:43:29.582 --> 0:43:29.901
<v Speaker 2>is here.

0:43:30.342 --> 0:43:34.942
<v Speaker 3>Fundamentally, is she absolutely correct in every assumption? She is

0:43:34.942 --> 0:43:37.822
<v Speaker 3>one hundred She's totally correct, and she's got the Happiness

0:43:37.822 --> 0:43:40.382
<v Speaker 3>guy explaining why she's correct, and she has all the research,

0:43:40.422 --> 0:43:45.822
<v Speaker 3>and la la la, like we know la la la, facts, facts,

0:43:45.942 --> 0:43:49.982
<v Speaker 3>But how does it feel? Well, I had to examine

0:43:49.982 --> 0:43:52.661
<v Speaker 3>my response because I've got my back up about this,

0:43:53.661 --> 0:43:57.501
<v Speaker 3>and this is something that I care about a lot

0:43:57.542 --> 0:43:59.901
<v Speaker 3>in parenting, Like I think that attention is really I've

0:43:59.902 --> 0:44:03.421
<v Speaker 3>heard Hugh van Kylenberg talk about this anecdote about being

0:44:03.422 --> 0:44:06.462
<v Speaker 3>at the park and his mother turning to him and saying,

0:44:06.661 --> 0:44:11.381
<v Speaker 3>you're missing it, and he realized that he hadn't looked

0:44:11.462 --> 0:44:15.022
<v Speaker 3>up right. And like, what I struggle with a bit

0:44:15.142 --> 0:44:20.382
<v Speaker 3>with these conversations is that it is easier to place

0:44:20.462 --> 0:44:23.102
<v Speaker 3>boundaries around your own screen time and your children's screen

0:44:23.102 --> 0:44:29.422
<v Speaker 3>time when you have nanny's money and energy and things

0:44:29.462 --> 0:44:33.462
<v Speaker 3>that are finite resources that certain privileges allow you. And

0:44:33.502 --> 0:44:35.422
<v Speaker 3>I don't want to go the whole privilege, the whole blot.

0:44:36.022 --> 0:44:37.941
<v Speaker 3>I just don't want this to turn into a thing

0:44:38.382 --> 0:44:42.941
<v Speaker 3>where rich parents finger wag at working parents or at

0:44:43.261 --> 0:44:44.382
<v Speaker 3>parents with less time.

0:44:44.582 --> 0:44:46.542
<v Speaker 2>I just I agree with you one hundred percent. But

0:44:46.862 --> 0:44:48.901
<v Speaker 2>in terms of the whole well, of course it's easy

0:44:48.942 --> 0:44:50.942
<v Speaker 2>for you. Kate is as we've already said, she's not

0:44:51.022 --> 0:44:54.622
<v Speaker 2>exactly Robinson Crusoe in saying this right exactly like she thought.

0:44:55.342 --> 0:44:56.982
<v Speaker 2>So I know what you mean, but this is a

0:44:56.982 --> 0:44:58.661
<v Speaker 2>message we're getting from all directions.

0:44:58.661 --> 0:44:59.022
<v Speaker 4>It is.

0:44:59.261 --> 0:45:03.901
<v Speaker 3>And I'm also a little bit worried about the standard

0:45:04.822 --> 0:45:09.142
<v Speaker 3>of intense engagement and connection and attention that we're expected

0:45:09.142 --> 0:45:11.421
<v Speaker 3>to have with that children twenty four to seven right,

0:45:11.982 --> 0:45:14.542
<v Speaker 3>the parenting verb. I've heard Ezra Klein say the reason

0:45:14.542 --> 0:45:16.822
<v Speaker 3>so many people have two kids is because we cannot

0:45:16.862 --> 0:45:18.622
<v Speaker 3>parent the way that we are being taught to parent.

0:45:18.661 --> 0:45:20.661
<v Speaker 3>With more than two kids, it would be impossible. Like

0:45:21.102 --> 0:45:25.181
<v Speaker 3>there's an intensity which we expect of ourselves that no

0:45:25.302 --> 0:45:27.862
<v Speaker 3>other generation has done. The idea that you would be

0:45:27.902 --> 0:45:33.062
<v Speaker 3>somewhat distracted while looking after your children is something that

0:45:33.221 --> 0:45:35.901
<v Speaker 3>has always happened. I do think that there's something about

0:45:35.942 --> 0:45:39.301
<v Speaker 3>looking at a phone that really zapps connection and all

0:45:39.302 --> 0:45:41.661
<v Speaker 3>of that. However, if I have a day at home

0:45:41.701 --> 0:45:44.741
<v Speaker 3>with Luna and that can be twelve hours of Jesse Luna,

0:45:44.822 --> 0:45:47.542
<v Speaker 3>the idea that I would be staring into her eyes

0:45:47.582 --> 0:45:50.741
<v Speaker 3>and intensely playing with her actually isn't.

0:45:50.462 --> 0:45:54.422
<v Speaker 2>Good for either of us. Like her, I'm not possible.

0:45:54.062 --> 0:45:56.462
<v Speaker 3>No, it's not possible. It's like the independent play. The

0:45:56.502 --> 0:45:58.662
<v Speaker 3>idea that she would toddle off and go and do something,

0:45:58.701 --> 0:46:01.781
<v Speaker 3>and I might pay a bill, or I might check

0:46:01.781 --> 0:46:03.861
<v Speaker 3>if the library is open, or I might text Lucer

0:46:03.942 --> 0:46:07.102
<v Speaker 3>and say, hey, can you pick up some milk? Like Unfortunately,

0:46:07.221 --> 0:46:09.022
<v Speaker 3>that is just the way that the world is, and

0:46:09.382 --> 0:46:12.661
<v Speaker 3>I don't need the narrative in my head. You are

0:46:12.781 --> 0:46:16.022
<v Speaker 3>part of an epidemic of disconnection every time I.

0:46:16.022 --> 0:46:18.702
<v Speaker 2>Do that, Amelia, do you think that if you're worrying

0:46:18.741 --> 0:46:22.062
<v Speaker 2>about this, like as Jesse is and many parents are

0:46:22.342 --> 0:46:25.661
<v Speaker 2>reading Jonathan Haight and listening to Princess Kate, that you're

0:46:25.741 --> 0:46:28.821
<v Speaker 2>probably not doing a shit job. Do you know what

0:46:28.822 --> 0:46:29.181
<v Speaker 2>I mean?

0:46:29.302 --> 0:46:30.142
<v Speaker 1>I do know what you mean.

0:46:30.181 --> 0:46:32.501
<v Speaker 4>And in fact, there have been studies on how much

0:46:32.582 --> 0:46:36.102
<v Speaker 4>time millennial parents are spending with their kids versus parents

0:46:36.102 --> 0:46:38.982
<v Speaker 4>of other generations, not ex don't worry. It's more millennials

0:46:39.062 --> 0:46:43.102
<v Speaker 4>versus boomers, and they've found that millennials are spending way

0:46:43.142 --> 0:46:46.461
<v Speaker 4>more time with their kids per week than boomers ever did.

0:46:46.862 --> 0:46:49.741
<v Speaker 4>So there is evidence that the style of parenting that

0:46:49.781 --> 0:46:52.502
<v Speaker 4>we are being told to embrace is much more intensive

0:46:52.582 --> 0:46:54.302
<v Speaker 4>than what previous generations.

0:46:53.862 --> 0:46:55.862
<v Speaker 1>Have had to do. They were probably off for a

0:46:55.902 --> 0:46:58.022
<v Speaker 1>smoke some of the time the generation.

0:46:58.181 --> 0:47:01.222
<v Speaker 2>And also, you know, just the tropes you think about

0:47:01.302 --> 0:47:04.222
<v Speaker 2>mothers at home with kids forever, so way before phones

0:47:04.342 --> 0:47:07.461
<v Speaker 2>is that she's on the phone to her mom, she's

0:47:07.502 --> 0:47:09.902
<v Speaker 2>talking to the neighbor over the back fence's doing a

0:47:09.902 --> 0:47:12.661
<v Speaker 2>million things like I don't think that it used to be. Oh,

0:47:12.701 --> 0:47:16.862
<v Speaker 2>before phones, parents just paid full attention to their children

0:47:16.862 --> 0:47:19.301
<v Speaker 2>at all times if they were around them, and that

0:47:19.382 --> 0:47:22.582
<v Speaker 2>distracted parents are a new thing. I mean, of course,

0:47:23.221 --> 0:47:25.622
<v Speaker 2>this all goes to say, as you've already pointed out, Jesse,

0:47:25.781 --> 0:47:28.062
<v Speaker 2>we all know the truth and the facts of what

0:47:28.102 --> 0:47:30.341
<v Speaker 2>phones have done to our attention. But I think it's

0:47:30.422 --> 0:47:33.982
<v Speaker 2>like a binary notion that once parents used to pay

0:47:34.022 --> 0:47:35.462
<v Speaker 2>attention and now they don't.

0:47:35.781 --> 0:47:37.422
<v Speaker 1>Yes, do you think, Oh? In fact, I think it's

0:47:37.462 --> 0:47:38.142
<v Speaker 1>a fallacy.

0:47:38.302 --> 0:47:40.142
<v Speaker 4>I think like there were all sorts of ways that

0:47:40.181 --> 0:47:43.422
<v Speaker 4>parents were distracted in previous generations that had nothing to

0:47:43.462 --> 0:47:45.301
<v Speaker 4>do with phones. Look, here's an example from my own

0:47:45.342 --> 0:47:48.022
<v Speaker 4>life that takes us out of parenting into what phones

0:47:48.062 --> 0:47:51.781
<v Speaker 4>are doing to our brains in general. I recently subscribed

0:47:51.862 --> 0:47:55.221
<v Speaker 4>to a print newspaper and I'm getting it every day

0:47:55.221 --> 0:47:58.181
<v Speaker 4>of the week, and on my way into work here

0:47:58.221 --> 0:48:01.462
<v Speaker 4>this morning, I read the print newspaper as opposed to

0:48:01.781 --> 0:48:04.062
<v Speaker 4>droom scrolling on my phone, and I can tell you

0:48:04.102 --> 0:48:06.181
<v Speaker 4>that the experience that you have, I'm not telling you

0:48:06.221 --> 0:48:09.142
<v Speaker 4>anything you don't know, but the experiences you've finished reading

0:48:09.181 --> 0:48:11.181
<v Speaker 4>the newspaper, you fold it up, you put it in

0:48:11.181 --> 0:48:13.181
<v Speaker 4>the recycling, you feel like, A you know what the

0:48:13.221 --> 0:48:16.661
<v Speaker 4>news is today, and B you feel considerably calmer. Then

0:48:16.701 --> 0:48:19.381
<v Speaker 4>if you've been jumping around the internet trying to read

0:48:19.422 --> 0:48:22.302
<v Speaker 4>the entire Internet in a forty minute commute.

0:48:21.902 --> 0:48:25.502
<v Speaker 2>And also you've kind of served a broader plate of things,

0:48:25.661 --> 0:48:28.781
<v Speaker 2>aren't you in a way, because on a homepage you'll

0:48:28.781 --> 0:48:31.502
<v Speaker 2>click the most salacious headlines and so on, whereas in

0:48:31.502 --> 0:48:33.622
<v Speaker 2>a newspaper it's kind of everything is there and you've

0:48:33.622 --> 0:48:36.902
<v Speaker 2>only got that. But back to Kate for a second.

0:48:37.102 --> 0:48:38.821
<v Speaker 2>So a lot of people obviously have come with the

0:48:38.862 --> 0:48:40.782
<v Speaker 2>criticism of like, what do you know when your princess

0:48:40.781 --> 0:48:45.582
<v Speaker 2>in your palace? Which fair, but also this is very

0:48:45.661 --> 0:48:48.982
<v Speaker 2>much Kate's wheelhouse. So as we all know, royals have

0:48:49.022 --> 0:48:52.181
<v Speaker 2>to pick some causes and it's tricky. It's kind of

0:48:52.221 --> 0:48:54.781
<v Speaker 2>like a first lady. Kate's role is very similar to this, right,

0:48:54.781 --> 0:48:57.221
<v Speaker 2>An American first lady would have to be like, I

0:48:57.302 --> 0:49:00.261
<v Speaker 2>need some causes so that I look busy. But they

0:49:00.302 --> 0:49:02.982
<v Speaker 2>can't be controversial. Yeah, so they can't be anything that

0:49:03.062 --> 0:49:05.502
<v Speaker 2>upsets anyone too much. It needs to look like I'm

0:49:05.502 --> 0:49:07.582
<v Speaker 2>trying to do good in the world. And when I

0:49:07.622 --> 0:49:09.942
<v Speaker 2>say that, I don't mean it entirely snick. I'm sure,

0:49:09.982 --> 0:49:11.502
<v Speaker 2>of course they want to. I'm sure Kate of course

0:49:11.502 --> 0:49:15.262
<v Speaker 2>wants to, and early childhood is her thing. This article

0:49:15.382 --> 0:49:18.821
<v Speaker 2>was published on the Royal Foundation Center for Early Childhood site,

0:49:18.822 --> 0:49:21.382
<v Speaker 2>which is Kate's thing, right, So the Royal Foundation at

0:49:21.462 --> 0:49:23.661
<v Speaker 2>her and Wills and they picked their stuff. What you

0:49:23.701 --> 0:49:26.022
<v Speaker 2>will notice if you've been looking at the Royal headlines

0:49:26.062 --> 0:49:28.382
<v Speaker 2>lately is that Kate and Williams seemed to be on

0:49:28.422 --> 0:49:31.462
<v Speaker 2>a humanization mission. And again I don't mean that cynically,

0:49:31.542 --> 0:49:34.582
<v Speaker 2>but the narrative put across by Prince Harry in particular

0:49:34.661 --> 0:49:37.422
<v Speaker 2>lately has kind of painted Kate and Wills as like

0:49:37.502 --> 0:49:43.422
<v Speaker 2>those stuffy, emotionless like old guard royals. And you know,

0:49:43.741 --> 0:49:45.982
<v Speaker 2>over here me and Meg's are like the real people

0:49:46.022 --> 0:49:48.221
<v Speaker 2>who are like, we're just letting it all hang out.

0:49:48.382 --> 0:49:50.381
<v Speaker 2>And you'll notice that William lately has made a couple

0:49:50.382 --> 0:49:52.661
<v Speaker 2>of really strategic decisions. One was to be interviewed by

0:49:52.661 --> 0:49:55.861
<v Speaker 2>Eugene Levy on a quite random travel show in which

0:49:55.902 --> 0:49:58.341
<v Speaker 2>he came across very human, very relaxed. And then he

0:49:58.382 --> 0:50:00.942
<v Speaker 2>also did an interview this weekend because one of his

0:50:01.261 --> 0:50:03.661
<v Speaker 2>passion projects, of course is mental health, as is Harry's,

0:50:04.022 --> 0:50:07.222
<v Speaker 2>and he did a interview this weekend with a woman

0:50:07.261 --> 0:50:10.261
<v Speaker 2>who had lost her husband to suicide. And it's a

0:50:10.462 --> 0:50:14.382
<v Speaker 2>very touching, affecting, genuine piece of content when you see it.

0:50:14.422 --> 0:50:16.701
<v Speaker 2>And I think that both he and Kate are kind

0:50:16.741 --> 0:50:19.422
<v Speaker 2>of coming up in that as we know, you know,

0:50:19.462 --> 0:50:21.582
<v Speaker 2>it's not going to be that long. Probably no one

0:50:21.582 --> 0:50:22.901
<v Speaker 2>wants to say that out loud, but it's not going

0:50:22.942 --> 0:50:25.222
<v Speaker 2>to be that long before he's king, and he's setting

0:50:25.221 --> 0:50:27.741
<v Speaker 2>the table for this is who I really am. And

0:50:27.781 --> 0:50:31.542
<v Speaker 2>I think he's pushing back on the narrative that they're cold,

0:50:32.102 --> 0:50:34.222
<v Speaker 2>and the best way for Kate to do that because

0:50:34.221 --> 0:50:40.261
<v Speaker 2>her public persona, not unlike Posh, is perfection control thinness,

0:50:40.302 --> 0:50:43.542
<v Speaker 2>no question, but like you know, always be perfect. But

0:50:43.741 --> 0:50:46.382
<v Speaker 2>she is clearly a very warm and engaged mother, and

0:50:46.422 --> 0:50:48.341
<v Speaker 2>she clearly cares a lot about kids, So this is

0:50:48.382 --> 0:50:51.301
<v Speaker 2>her cause and she's really into it. I think it's

0:50:51.741 --> 0:50:56.421
<v Speaker 2>tricky though, because anything you say about parenting is inevitably

0:50:56.462 --> 0:50:58.982
<v Speaker 2>controversial because it pushes all our judgment buttons.

0:50:59.062 --> 0:51:02.181
<v Speaker 3>It's just so loaded, no matter how much research goes

0:51:02.181 --> 0:51:04.622
<v Speaker 3>into it. And I think that that's because parents have

0:51:04.701 --> 0:51:08.301
<v Speaker 3>never taken the job more seriously, and there's never been

0:51:08.902 --> 0:51:12.142
<v Speaker 3>more advice and bombardment of like you must do this,

0:51:12.261 --> 0:51:15.381
<v Speaker 3>you mustn't do that. I think parents are completely overwhelmed.

0:51:15.862 --> 0:51:18.382
<v Speaker 3>We do, of course know this to be true, but

0:51:18.502 --> 0:51:21.341
<v Speaker 3>any sense that we're having a finger wagged at us,

0:51:21.942 --> 0:51:25.542
<v Speaker 3>I think generates this emotional response. Whereas I compared that

0:51:25.701 --> 0:51:28.781
<v Speaker 3>to Kate Winslet, who's actually been banging on with the

0:51:28.822 --> 0:51:31.301
<v Speaker 3>same message for a really long time and has been

0:51:31.342 --> 0:51:34.701
<v Speaker 3>part of campaigns, and something about her messaging felt like

0:51:34.741 --> 0:51:38.701
<v Speaker 3>it was more empowering to parents than it was shamey.

0:51:39.142 --> 0:51:41.622
<v Speaker 3>And she basically says, you don't have to give your

0:51:41.701 --> 0:51:44.741
<v Speaker 3>kid a phone, like you can hold off. And she's

0:51:44.781 --> 0:51:46.301
<v Speaker 3>got kids who are now in the early twenties, but

0:51:46.342 --> 0:51:47.821
<v Speaker 3>she's like, I never gave them a phone, they never

0:51:47.822 --> 0:51:50.142
<v Speaker 3>got on social media. I just very kind of no

0:51:50.261 --> 0:51:53.661
<v Speaker 3>bullshit about it. And for some reason I had more

0:51:54.542 --> 0:51:56.901
<v Speaker 3>tolerance for that approach than this one.

0:51:56.942 --> 0:51:59.341
<v Speaker 4>Maybe so since we're talking about the messaging, I want

0:51:59.382 --> 0:52:01.982
<v Speaker 4>to ask you both about the difference between Kate and

0:52:02.142 --> 0:52:06.102
<v Speaker 4>William's approach to this subject and Harry and Maggan's, because

0:52:06.142 --> 0:52:09.542
<v Speaker 4>both of them are talking a lot about the impact

0:52:09.822 --> 0:52:11.662
<v Speaker 4>of the digital world on young minds.

0:52:12.062 --> 0:52:13.462
<v Speaker 1>But there's a key difference.

0:52:13.982 --> 0:52:17.142
<v Speaker 4>Kate is talking here about phones in general and digital

0:52:17.142 --> 0:52:21.381
<v Speaker 4>devices in general, whereas Megan and Harry have been very

0:52:21.422 --> 0:52:25.261
<v Speaker 4>explicitly focused on the dangers of social media. Do you

0:52:25.261 --> 0:52:27.821
<v Speaker 4>get annoyed about the social media message as well, or

0:52:27.902 --> 0:52:30.062
<v Speaker 4>is it more just the blanket phone message.

0:52:30.181 --> 0:52:33.181
<v Speaker 3>I wonder if it's the more specific the message the better.

0:52:33.342 --> 0:52:37.142
<v Speaker 3>I found this really vague. Yes, And I also thought,

0:52:37.342 --> 0:52:39.741
<v Speaker 3>and this is where I guess the privileged discussion goes up,

0:52:39.781 --> 0:52:41.221
<v Speaker 3>like it's easier if you have a kid who's getting

0:52:41.221 --> 0:52:43.221
<v Speaker 3>picked up from school. Right there are people with twelve

0:52:43.302 --> 0:52:46.062
<v Speaker 3>year olds who their kid has to get two buses

0:52:46.062 --> 0:52:48.741
<v Speaker 3>in a train to and from school, and whether or

0:52:48.741 --> 0:52:51.502
<v Speaker 3>not they need a phone is sort of dependent on that.

0:52:51.701 --> 0:52:54.381
<v Speaker 2>So I'm sorry, but I mean, my kids are teenagers

0:52:54.422 --> 0:52:57.821
<v Speaker 2>and they have phones. I'm looking forward to the social

0:52:57.902 --> 0:52:59.582
<v Speaker 2>media ban. I've been on the record of saying that

0:52:59.622 --> 0:53:02.462
<v Speaker 2>I think it's a great idea, and it's definitely allowed

0:53:02.502 --> 0:53:04.861
<v Speaker 2>me to make a decision about my son, who's the

0:53:04.902 --> 0:53:08.582
<v Speaker 2>younger one that I feel like I've got ammunition ammunition

0:53:08.622 --> 0:53:11.622
<v Speaker 2>from the government on that stoked about it, but it

0:53:11.701 --> 0:53:15.142
<v Speaker 2>is very unrealistic. It's great, like, and I know there

0:53:15.142 --> 0:53:16.542
<v Speaker 2>will be lots of parents will hear this and then

0:53:16.582 --> 0:53:18.342
<v Speaker 2>message and go, I never gave my kids a phone

0:53:18.582 --> 0:53:21.901
<v Speaker 2>or a screen, but like, what are they doing these

0:53:22.022 --> 0:53:25.502
<v Speaker 2>kids who don't have that? Because it's the equivalent now

0:53:25.502 --> 0:53:27.461
<v Speaker 2>of when I came home from school, I'd watch TV

0:53:27.661 --> 0:53:29.821
<v Speaker 2>for a bit, you know, I'd watch TV. And I

0:53:29.942 --> 0:53:31.941
<v Speaker 2>know that phones are different from TV because the short

0:53:31.982 --> 0:53:35.622
<v Speaker 2>form videos are boiling their minds and everything. But mindless

0:53:35.622 --> 0:53:38.062
<v Speaker 2>pleasures that involve screens are not new. This is new,

0:53:38.142 --> 0:53:40.421
<v Speaker 2>and I think it's really great that we're pushing back

0:53:40.422 --> 0:53:42.502
<v Speaker 2>on the tech bros and all of those things. But

0:53:42.661 --> 0:53:45.261
<v Speaker 2>it really does, as you point out, Jesse, become a

0:53:45.342 --> 0:53:48.181
<v Speaker 2>division of like who is supervising their kids at all

0:53:48.181 --> 0:53:54.142
<v Speaker 2>times and giving them really wholesome, active, improving tasks and

0:53:54.221 --> 0:53:57.502
<v Speaker 2>activities and classes. Because we're also told don't overschedule them,

0:53:57.542 --> 0:53:59.462
<v Speaker 2>don't be a tiger parent. Da da da dah. Let

0:53:59.502 --> 0:54:01.261
<v Speaker 2>them get bored. Yeah, let them get bored, let them

0:54:01.661 --> 0:54:04.982
<v Speaker 2>like who is super? And that does come back to

0:54:04.982 --> 0:54:06.942
<v Speaker 2>the privilege. I think it's interesting because I think that

0:54:07.102 --> 0:54:09.262
<v Speaker 2>as we're knowing more and more and more about this impact,

0:54:09.701 --> 0:54:12.142
<v Speaker 2>in five years, we will look at phones around kids

0:54:12.181 --> 0:54:13.861
<v Speaker 2>a bit like we look at smoking around kids. I

0:54:13.862 --> 0:54:16.861
<v Speaker 2>do think that. I also think, though, that there will

0:54:16.862 --> 0:54:20.422
<v Speaker 2>be a massive class gap in that situation, because I

0:54:20.502 --> 0:54:24.142
<v Speaker 2>hear middle class parents around me say, oh, I'm not

0:54:24.181 --> 0:54:26.542
<v Speaker 2>going to be strict about lots of things, but sugar

0:54:26.622 --> 0:54:29.221
<v Speaker 2>and screens, no, you know, And that is a very

0:54:29.942 --> 0:54:34.422
<v Speaker 2>sort of classist division that suggests I've got time and

0:54:34.502 --> 0:54:37.701
<v Speaker 2>resources to do all these things with my children that

0:54:37.902 --> 0:54:40.821
<v Speaker 2>you lazy people who have other things to do and

0:54:41.221 --> 0:54:43.142
<v Speaker 2>want to just hand your kid a phone or a

0:54:43.142 --> 0:54:46.861
<v Speaker 2>screen don't have. It's interesting because I think it's one

0:54:46.902 --> 0:54:48.821
<v Speaker 2>of those times when where we started with this is

0:54:48.862 --> 0:54:51.301
<v Speaker 2>we know it's right, but it's going to take a

0:54:51.342 --> 0:54:55.102
<v Speaker 2>while for us to really figure out what parenting looks

0:54:55.142 --> 0:54:58.261
<v Speaker 2>like without screens. That is all we've got time for.

0:54:58.342 --> 0:55:01.261
<v Speaker 2>On this Monday out Loud is a massive thank you

0:55:01.661 --> 0:55:03.142
<v Speaker 2>to all of you who are here with us to

0:55:03.181 --> 0:55:04.982
<v Speaker 2>start off the week and hopefully stick with us as

0:55:05.022 --> 0:55:07.502
<v Speaker 2>we go through it, and to our fabulous team for

0:55:07.542 --> 0:55:10.462
<v Speaker 2>putting the show together. Friends, don't forget you can watch

0:55:10.542 --> 0:55:12.301
<v Speaker 2>us on YouTube. Why wouldn't you want to do that?

0:55:13.822 --> 0:55:16.341
<v Speaker 2>And we'll be back in your ears tomorrow with that

0:55:16.462 --> 0:55:19.301
<v Speaker 2>deep dive about the Victoria Beckham docker where we'll go

0:55:19.342 --> 0:55:21.382
<v Speaker 2>to all the juicy places, We'll go to all the

0:55:21.542 --> 0:55:24.862
<v Speaker 2>where was Brooklyn? Was that skirt too short?

0:55:26.181 --> 0:55:27.421
<v Speaker 3>How is that woman's name?

0:55:29.582 --> 0:55:34.901
<v Speaker 2>So you then eat the whisper. Shout out to any

0:55:34.942 --> 0:55:37.901
<v Speaker 2>Mamma Mia subscribers listening. If you love the show and

0:55:37.982 --> 0:55:40.741
<v Speaker 2>you want to support us, subscribing to Mamma Mia is

0:55:40.781 --> 0:55:43.142
<v Speaker 2>the very best way to do it. There's a link

0:55:43.221 --> 0:55:44.422
<v Speaker 2>in the episode description