WEBVTT - Meet The Renowned Australian Prosecutor With A Target On Her Back

0:00:11.502 --> 0:00:16.142
<v Speaker 1>You're listing to a Mumma Mea podcast. Mamma Mea acknowledges

0:00:16.222 --> 0:00:19.662
<v Speaker 1>the traditional owners of land and waterers. This podcast was

0:00:19.702 --> 0:00:27.302
<v Speaker 1>recorded on it's early August in Sydney in the year

0:00:27.302 --> 0:00:30.222
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and the city is gearing up to host

0:00:30.262 --> 0:00:34.702
<v Speaker 1>the Olympics. Two year twelve girls aged seventeen and eighteen

0:00:34.742 --> 0:00:37.262
<v Speaker 1>are at Chatswood shopping center chatting to a group of

0:00:37.262 --> 0:00:41.222
<v Speaker 1>teenage boys. They're offered a lift home, so they accept.

0:00:41.862 --> 0:00:45.822
<v Speaker 1>Hopping into a white van with the group, they're taken

0:00:45.822 --> 0:00:51.462
<v Speaker 1>to Greenacre in the city's west, where they're slacked, threatened, pushed,

0:00:51.542 --> 0:00:56.462
<v Speaker 1>and raped by a total of eight males. Two days later,

0:00:56.582 --> 0:00:59.742
<v Speaker 1>the group strikes again, giving a sixteen year old girl

0:00:59.782 --> 0:01:02.422
<v Speaker 1>a lift into the city. Taken to a park and

0:01:02.502 --> 0:01:06.582
<v Speaker 1>ambushed by a group of fourteen the teenager is raped

0:01:06.622 --> 0:01:09.502
<v Speaker 1>by two of them while the others watch on and laugh.

0:01:11.342 --> 0:01:14.422
<v Speaker 1>On August thirty, an eighteen year old woman is approached

0:01:14.422 --> 0:01:18.222
<v Speaker 1>by the group on a train to Bankstown. She's persuaded

0:01:18.262 --> 0:01:21.102
<v Speaker 1>to get off with them, tricked into entering a public toilet,

0:01:21.702 --> 0:01:25.262
<v Speaker 1>and raped over and over. Both there and in two

0:01:25.302 --> 0:01:30.382
<v Speaker 1>other locations. She's sexually assaulted by fourteen men and boys

0:01:30.422 --> 0:01:34.742
<v Speaker 1>in total over the course of six terrifying hours. As

0:01:34.742 --> 0:01:38.182
<v Speaker 1>a final humiliation, they hose her down and throw her

0:01:38.222 --> 0:01:42.382
<v Speaker 1>into the street near a train station. In early September,

0:01:42.902 --> 0:01:45.262
<v Speaker 1>two sixteen year old girls are picked up from another

0:01:45.342 --> 0:01:49.542
<v Speaker 1>railway station in the city's southwest. They're repeatedly raped by

0:01:49.622 --> 0:01:55.022
<v Speaker 1>three males over a period of five hours. This series

0:01:55.062 --> 0:01:58.542
<v Speaker 1>of horrific crimes becomes known as the Scaff Gang rapes,

0:01:58.982 --> 0:02:02.862
<v Speaker 1>named after the gang's ringleaders, brothers Bellal and Muhammad Scaff.

0:02:03.822 --> 0:02:06.742
<v Speaker 1>The magnitude of the horror they subjected their victims to

0:02:06.862 --> 0:02:09.542
<v Speaker 1>left our country in a state of shock and outrage,

0:02:09.902 --> 0:02:12.462
<v Speaker 1>with a judge which describing the offenses as events that

0:02:12.502 --> 0:02:15.582
<v Speaker 1>you hear about or read about only in the context

0:02:15.662 --> 0:02:20.902
<v Speaker 1>of wartime atrocities. The group, aged between sixteen and twenty,

0:02:21.582 --> 0:02:24.862
<v Speaker 1>consisted of up to fourteen boys and men, but only

0:02:24.982 --> 0:02:28.302
<v Speaker 1>nine were convicted, sentenced to a total of more than

0:02:28.342 --> 0:02:32.422
<v Speaker 1>two hundred and forty years in prison. Only one of

0:02:32.462 --> 0:02:42.582
<v Speaker 1>them remains behind bars. I'm Jemma Bath and This is

0:02:42.622 --> 0:02:46.822
<v Speaker 1>True Crime Conversations Amoma mea podcast exploring the world's most

0:02:46.862 --> 0:02:49.822
<v Speaker 1>notorious crimes by speaking to the people who know the

0:02:49.862 --> 0:02:53.902
<v Speaker 1>most about them. Our guest today led the prosecution of

0:02:53.942 --> 0:02:58.302
<v Speaker 1>the two thousand Scaff gang rapes. Margaret Kneen sc has

0:02:58.382 --> 0:03:01.502
<v Speaker 1>enjoyed a long career as a Crown Prosecutor and Deputy

0:03:01.582 --> 0:03:05.742
<v Speaker 1>Senior Crown Prosecutor, leading hundreds of judge only and jury

0:03:05.782 --> 0:03:08.942
<v Speaker 1>criminal trials and appeals in the New South Wales Court

0:03:09.022 --> 0:03:12.782
<v Speaker 1>of Criminal Appeal and High Court of Australia. She's recorded

0:03:12.822 --> 0:03:16.262
<v Speaker 1>a long succession of convictions against rapists and murderers, including

0:03:16.302 --> 0:03:19.982
<v Speaker 1>the butcher of Beager and pedophile Robert Dolly Dunn, and

0:03:20.062 --> 0:03:22.982
<v Speaker 1>has served as Commissioner of the New South Wales Special

0:03:22.982 --> 0:03:26.622
<v Speaker 1>Commission of Inquiry into matters relating to the police investigation

0:03:26.742 --> 0:03:30.502
<v Speaker 1>of certain child sexual abuse allegations in the Roman Catholic

0:03:30.582 --> 0:03:34.502
<v Speaker 1>Diocese of Maitland Newcastle. She's had her fair share of

0:03:34.582 --> 0:03:38.102
<v Speaker 1>controversy too. At the end of twenty fourteen, she was

0:03:38.142 --> 0:03:41.822
<v Speaker 1>investigated by the New South Wales EYEKAC, who were pursuing

0:03:41.862 --> 0:03:45.702
<v Speaker 1>her for corrupt conduct. She was accused of perverting the

0:03:45.742 --> 0:03:49.342
<v Speaker 1>course of justice for advising her son's girlfriend to fake

0:03:49.542 --> 0:03:52.662
<v Speaker 1>chest pains to avoid a breath test after a car crash.

0:03:53.142 --> 0:03:56.422
<v Speaker 1>She was fully exonerated and her involvement in the inquiry

0:03:56.462 --> 0:04:00.862
<v Speaker 1>at all was revealed to be a big misunderstanding. Retiring

0:04:00.942 --> 0:04:04.742
<v Speaker 1>from public office in twenty nineteen, Margaret embarked on a

0:04:04.782 --> 0:04:08.942
<v Speaker 1>brand new chapter, doing the complete professional opposite of what

0:04:09.022 --> 0:04:13.342
<v Speaker 1>she's done for so long, defending the accused instead of

0:04:13.382 --> 0:04:17.182
<v Speaker 1>prosecuting them. Her career is outlined in a chronicle called

0:04:17.182 --> 0:04:20.902
<v Speaker 1>The Boxing Butterfly, which explores some of her biggest cases

0:04:20.942 --> 0:04:26.662
<v Speaker 1>and moments. Margaret joins us, now, Margaret, you've had a

0:04:26.782 --> 0:04:31.542
<v Speaker 1>very big career. Do you have a proudest moment? Is

0:04:31.542 --> 0:04:35.062
<v Speaker 1>that something you're even able to do with so many achievements.

0:04:35.702 --> 0:04:39.262
<v Speaker 2>I do have one, and it's fairly recent, and it's

0:04:39.302 --> 0:04:42.822
<v Speaker 2>in my time as defense counsel. Because my career is

0:04:42.902 --> 0:04:46.022
<v Speaker 2>now forty eight years old at the end of this year,

0:04:46.062 --> 0:04:49.302
<v Speaker 2>forty eight years of full time work. My goodness, no wonder,

0:04:49.942 --> 0:04:52.662
<v Speaker 2>no wonder, I feel tired. The big moment for me,

0:04:52.982 --> 0:04:57.662
<v Speaker 2>the biggest achievement was winning a case that perhaps most

0:04:57.702 --> 0:05:01.822
<v Speaker 2>people wouldn't have seen the success in. And it's the

0:05:01.862 --> 0:05:05.622
<v Speaker 2>case of Coulwynda Singh, who was charged with burning his

0:05:05.702 --> 0:05:10.062
<v Speaker 2>wife to death. And I sensed very much a bit

0:05:10.102 --> 0:05:13.742
<v Speaker 2>of a racist persecution going on and even that the

0:05:13.742 --> 0:05:16.102
<v Speaker 2>Crown was going to get an expert to say that

0:05:16.182 --> 0:05:20.622
<v Speaker 2>Indian men burn their wives and on her short list

0:05:20.742 --> 0:05:23.222
<v Speaker 2>to prove that this expert, who had never been to India,

0:05:23.262 --> 0:05:26.182
<v Speaker 2>by the way, she already had mister Singh's name on it,

0:05:26.622 --> 0:05:29.902
<v Speaker 2>and he hadn't been convicted. And as it happened, there

0:05:30.022 --> 0:05:33.062
<v Speaker 2>was plenty of evidence in that case, plenty of forensic evidence,

0:05:33.102 --> 0:05:37.302
<v Speaker 2>and it all pointed to the deceased woman having set

0:05:37.302 --> 0:05:40.222
<v Speaker 2>her self on fire, but not to burn herself. It

0:05:40.302 --> 0:05:43.182
<v Speaker 2>was a mistake. She used petrol instead of kerosene. She'd

0:05:43.222 --> 0:05:45.782
<v Speaker 2>prepared herself, she'd put a hair up that she usually

0:05:45.822 --> 0:05:49.102
<v Speaker 2>had down in a wet towel. She prepared everything, and

0:05:49.142 --> 0:05:51.862
<v Speaker 2>hers were the only fingerprints in DNA on the petrol

0:05:51.942 --> 0:05:55.502
<v Speaker 2>can and on the lighter. But poor mister Singh, who

0:05:55.622 --> 0:05:58.502
<v Speaker 2>is who I could faithfully say to the jury, has

0:05:58.582 --> 0:06:02.462
<v Speaker 2>never had a drink, smoke, gambled, didn't have anyone on

0:06:02.542 --> 0:06:05.862
<v Speaker 2>the side, so to speak, never been to a brothel, casino, nothing,

0:06:05.942 --> 0:06:09.102
<v Speaker 2>Just a hard working guy with a lovely family. It

0:06:09.222 --> 0:06:12.182
<v Speaker 2>wasn't him, but he was. He was treated so badly

0:06:12.262 --> 0:06:15.222
<v Speaker 2>by everyone who assumed it must have been well that

0:06:15.302 --> 0:06:18.622
<v Speaker 2>he did it to her. So it was hard won

0:06:18.822 --> 0:06:22.382
<v Speaker 2>victory because the first trial was conducted in a way

0:06:22.422 --> 0:06:26.182
<v Speaker 2>which wasn't allowed the second time by the prosecution desperate

0:06:26.262 --> 0:06:29.582
<v Speaker 2>for a conviction and breaking it up. Well, even if

0:06:29.902 --> 0:06:32.542
<v Speaker 2>she did it, you forced her to and all these

0:06:32.582 --> 0:06:36.502
<v Speaker 2>different permutations. But finally, and that was a hung jury.

0:06:36.542 --> 0:06:38.942
<v Speaker 2>The second time, we were able to keep the crown

0:06:38.982 --> 0:06:42.542
<v Speaker 2>to admissible evidence and the jury very quickly came back

0:06:42.542 --> 0:06:45.622
<v Speaker 2>with a not guilty verdict. But he spent a lot

0:06:45.662 --> 0:06:48.022
<v Speaker 2>of his own money, he did four months in jail,

0:06:48.622 --> 0:06:52.022
<v Speaker 2>and he's just suffered so much. And it just shows

0:06:52.062 --> 0:06:55.822
<v Speaker 2>that investigators ought not to jump to conclusions and that

0:06:55.862 --> 0:06:59.102
<v Speaker 2>the legal process testing all the evidence is there for

0:06:59.222 --> 0:06:59.902
<v Speaker 2>a good reason.

0:07:00.702 --> 0:07:03.822
<v Speaker 1>It's interesting that you pick a proudest moment from your

0:07:03.942 --> 0:07:06.142
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to call it second act, because you spent

0:07:06.302 --> 0:07:10.782
<v Speaker 1>so much time on the other side prosecuting cases. What

0:07:10.822 --> 0:07:13.982
<v Speaker 1>has it been like spending the last few years in defense?

0:07:14.062 --> 0:07:16.782
<v Speaker 2>Yes, six years now. I didn't know whether anyone would

0:07:16.782 --> 0:07:21.222
<v Speaker 2>brief me. I left the Crown at sixty and thought, well,

0:07:21.342 --> 0:07:24.262
<v Speaker 2>that's the sort of where the super comes to a

0:07:24.302 --> 0:07:26.662
<v Speaker 2>sort of stop. So let's see what it's like. Will

0:07:26.702 --> 0:07:29.702
<v Speaker 2>anyone brief me, But I didn't get any briefs from

0:07:30.102 --> 0:07:35.222
<v Speaker 2>the prosecution none, And so I was briefed by many

0:07:35.262 --> 0:07:39.102
<v Speaker 2>different defense solicitors, most of whom I'd never worked with.

0:07:39.262 --> 0:07:44.062
<v Speaker 2>But there's just so much work, and I'm still turning

0:07:44.062 --> 0:07:47.862
<v Speaker 2>it away and booked out well towards the end of

0:07:47.942 --> 0:07:52.182
<v Speaker 2>next year. So it's true that I did some wonderful

0:07:52.502 --> 0:07:56.542
<v Speaker 2>cases as a Crown prosecutor, and I'm still in contact

0:07:56.622 --> 0:08:01.822
<v Speaker 2>with dozens of families, especially bereaved parents of children who

0:08:01.822 --> 0:08:05.862
<v Speaker 2>were killed, such as Lindsay van Blanken, whose body was

0:08:05.862 --> 0:08:08.982
<v Speaker 2>found in a cricket bag. I'm still friends with her

0:08:09.062 --> 0:08:12.782
<v Speaker 2>mum and her sister. But in a sense, Jemma, I've

0:08:12.822 --> 0:08:15.382
<v Speaker 2>got to say that it's a bit more of a

0:08:15.502 --> 0:08:22.422
<v Speaker 2>challenge on the defense side. It's generally more straightforward on

0:08:22.502 --> 0:08:26.222
<v Speaker 2>the prosecution side. If you're on the correct side, and

0:08:26.262 --> 0:08:29.262
<v Speaker 2>you should be by the time a trial gets up,

0:08:29.622 --> 0:08:33.262
<v Speaker 2>the Crown prosecutor should be very confident of the evidence

0:08:33.942 --> 0:08:36.542
<v Speaker 2>and very confident of the way the matter should go

0:08:37.182 --> 0:08:40.182
<v Speaker 2>by having made sure that it's all been tested to

0:08:40.222 --> 0:08:45.262
<v Speaker 2>some degree and everything checked before someone is put on trial.

0:08:45.822 --> 0:08:48.542
<v Speaker 2>But from the defense point of view, being against the

0:08:49.702 --> 0:08:56.622
<v Speaker 2>zeitgeist against the publicity and the tendency now it seems

0:08:56.662 --> 0:08:59.782
<v Speaker 2>to me for people to make up their mind before

0:08:59.822 --> 0:09:04.102
<v Speaker 2>someone is convicted, and so that's a very negative influence

0:09:04.302 --> 0:09:07.902
<v Speaker 2>carrying through the trial. And it's very hard for people,

0:09:08.022 --> 0:09:10.222
<v Speaker 2>especially people in the public eye, who get put on

0:09:11.462 --> 0:09:14.302
<v Speaker 2>because so often it's as though they've already been convicted

0:09:14.422 --> 0:09:18.542
<v Speaker 2>just when they're charged, and people forget that as they

0:09:18.582 --> 0:09:21.022
<v Speaker 2>would want if they were charged, they'd want the evidence

0:09:21.062 --> 0:09:23.342
<v Speaker 2>to be tested and proved beyond reasonable doubt.

0:09:23.822 --> 0:09:25.342
<v Speaker 1>Everyone is innocent until they're not.

0:09:25.662 --> 0:09:25.982
<v Speaker 2>Yes.

0:09:26.302 --> 0:09:27.702
<v Speaker 1>So is that a welcome challenge for you?

0:09:28.302 --> 0:09:31.542
<v Speaker 2>Well, I was daunted by it and thought it might

0:09:31.582 --> 0:09:35.182
<v Speaker 2>be difficult to change because I used to be criticized

0:09:35.182 --> 0:09:37.382
<v Speaker 2>a lot for this. I get very close to the

0:09:37.422 --> 0:09:40.462
<v Speaker 2>people I work with, and I was criticized very much,

0:09:40.902 --> 0:09:44.262
<v Speaker 2>and I think, perhaps in a somewhat sexist fashion for

0:09:44.342 --> 0:09:49.662
<v Speaker 2>decades for being just affectionate with young women who'd been

0:09:49.982 --> 0:09:53.582
<v Speaker 2>terribly assaulted or parents who'd lost a child. And I

0:09:53.702 --> 0:09:56.022
<v Speaker 2>warmed to those people and thought it would be easier

0:09:56.062 --> 0:09:59.302
<v Speaker 2>for them if they knew how much it meant to

0:09:59.382 --> 0:10:03.062
<v Speaker 2>me for them to get justice. And so I've been

0:10:03.302 --> 0:10:08.542
<v Speaker 2>criticized for hugging people and having my arm around people

0:10:08.622 --> 0:10:12.142
<v Speaker 2>and so forth, showing oh that's it, yes, Oh, yes,

0:10:12.182 --> 0:10:14.702
<v Speaker 2>we must have none of us be kind. Yes, that's right,

0:10:14.822 --> 0:10:18.302
<v Speaker 2>even if we were you know, mothers and grandmothers and in.

0:10:18.262 --> 0:10:19.462
<v Speaker 1>The worst moments of their lives.

0:10:19.542 --> 0:10:22.062
<v Speaker 2>Yes, it is the worst moment of anyone's life to

0:10:22.102 --> 0:10:25.222
<v Speaker 2>go through a court process, and the more serious the

0:10:25.302 --> 0:10:29.582
<v Speaker 2>case that the worse it is for all parties. And

0:10:29.662 --> 0:10:32.542
<v Speaker 2>so you can see that people need kindness. But then

0:10:32.742 --> 0:10:35.342
<v Speaker 2>when I was a prosecutor and I saw a woman

0:10:36.102 --> 0:10:38.222
<v Speaker 2>just quietly crying, and I knew it was the mother

0:10:38.342 --> 0:10:42.062
<v Speaker 2>of the man who had just been convicted of murder.

0:10:42.382 --> 0:10:44.382
<v Speaker 2>And I saw her crying there, and she was a mum,

0:10:44.422 --> 0:10:47.142
<v Speaker 2>and I just I asked the defense counsel could I

0:10:47.222 --> 0:10:49.742
<v Speaker 2>just go and see her? And I ended up holding

0:10:49.782 --> 0:10:53.142
<v Speaker 2>her and hugging her because no one else was. So

0:10:53.382 --> 0:10:57.822
<v Speaker 2>we have to have humanity in our justice system, because

0:10:57.862 --> 0:11:00.142
<v Speaker 2>it's very, very much a part of it. It's not

0:11:00.662 --> 0:11:05.662
<v Speaker 2>it's not a mathematical calculation. It's even the determination of

0:11:05.702 --> 0:11:08.822
<v Speaker 2>these cases has so much it relies on so much

0:11:08.902 --> 0:11:10.662
<v Speaker 2>knowledge of human nature, and.

0:11:10.862 --> 0:11:13.982
<v Speaker 1>Court is scary if you haven't been in one. I've

0:11:13.982 --> 0:11:17.102
<v Speaker 1>covered them as a court reporter. They're really intimidating places.

0:11:17.222 --> 0:11:19.982
<v Speaker 1>And so these families have often never set foot in

0:11:20.062 --> 0:11:23.702
<v Speaker 1>a court before, and suddenly there's judges, there's prosecutors, there's defense,

0:11:23.742 --> 0:11:26.662
<v Speaker 1>there's criminals, and it's very overwhelming.

0:11:26.222 --> 0:11:29.902
<v Speaker 2>Yes, in a bit of an arcane language too, perhaps

0:11:29.942 --> 0:11:33.582
<v Speaker 2>deliberately set so that people don't quite know what's going on.

0:11:33.822 --> 0:11:33.902
<v Speaker 1>Ye.

0:11:34.142 --> 0:11:38.342
<v Speaker 2>And the intimidation is deliberate too, to try to scare

0:11:38.342 --> 0:11:40.542
<v Speaker 2>people into telling the truth. I don't know if it

0:11:40.622 --> 0:11:43.902
<v Speaker 2>really works like that anymore. That, like many other of

0:11:43.942 --> 0:11:47.222
<v Speaker 2>the trappings of the criminal justice system, have changed a

0:11:47.262 --> 0:11:51.102
<v Speaker 2>lot in the forty odd years I've been in it.

0:11:51.102 --> 0:11:52.942
<v Speaker 1>It's probably a good segue to bring me to a

0:11:52.982 --> 0:11:55.062
<v Speaker 1>sentence in your book that really stood out to me

0:11:55.302 --> 0:11:57.982
<v Speaker 1>right at the start in the introduction, and it said,

0:11:58.622 --> 0:12:02.102
<v Speaker 1>she has been trenchantly attacked by some colleagues in the profession.

0:12:02.462 --> 0:12:06.182
<v Speaker 1>Perhaps they mistook her niceness for weakness. It was an

0:12:06.182 --> 0:12:10.582
<v Speaker 1>observation by your co author. What would you say to that,

0:12:10.702 --> 0:12:12.862
<v Speaker 1>because that kind of speaks to what you've just been

0:12:12.902 --> 0:12:16.302
<v Speaker 1>saying about people looking at you showing empathy and kindness

0:12:16.542 --> 0:12:19.622
<v Speaker 1>and positive emotion as a weakness.

0:12:19.302 --> 0:12:22.542
<v Speaker 2>For a few decades. I think it was ago I

0:12:22.702 --> 0:12:26.662
<v Speaker 2>noticed that people thought that if you're quite pleasant and

0:12:26.942 --> 0:12:29.822
<v Speaker 2>polite with people and nice to people, polite with the

0:12:29.862 --> 0:12:32.942
<v Speaker 2>other side, you can't be taking it seriously enough. You've

0:12:32.942 --> 0:12:36.982
<v Speaker 2>got to walk in there with a stern look and

0:12:37.302 --> 0:12:39.222
<v Speaker 2>don't get too close to people, and be a bit

0:12:39.262 --> 0:12:43.422
<v Speaker 2>of an object rather than a person. But well, I've

0:12:43.502 --> 0:12:46.622
<v Speaker 2>just continued to do it my way, and if people

0:12:46.622 --> 0:12:49.142
<v Speaker 2>don't like it, well, many of the people who don't

0:12:49.222 --> 0:12:52.342
<v Speaker 2>like it aren't there anymore, so it doesn't matter, and you've.

0:12:52.222 --> 0:12:57.022
<v Speaker 1>Got your achievements to show. You have spoken before about

0:12:57.022 --> 0:13:01.342
<v Speaker 1>your own experience of sexual abuse in your childhood. Did

0:13:01.342 --> 0:13:05.182
<v Speaker 1>that help to inform your why when you entered this career,

0:13:05.222 --> 0:13:08.222
<v Speaker 1>And also, I guess the empathy that you.

0:13:08.222 --> 0:13:11.102
<v Speaker 2>Have it certainly did infor me, because because I knew

0:13:11.222 --> 0:13:14.342
<v Speaker 2>very well from when I first started working in the

0:13:14.382 --> 0:13:17.582
<v Speaker 2>prosecution of child sexual assault in the nineteen eighties, I

0:13:17.622 --> 0:13:21.222
<v Speaker 2>knew things that other people who only had a theoretical

0:13:21.262 --> 0:13:24.662
<v Speaker 2>knowledge didn't appreciate. And one of the main things is

0:13:24.662 --> 0:13:29.062
<v Speaker 2>how child sexual abuse can happen virtually under the noses

0:13:29.102 --> 0:13:34.342
<v Speaker 2>of parents. And so it's not really an answer to say, oh, well,

0:13:34.582 --> 0:13:37.222
<v Speaker 2>the parents were there, and how could this have happened?

0:13:37.262 --> 0:13:41.542
<v Speaker 2>Because so much of it is furtive grooming behavior. And

0:13:41.622 --> 0:13:44.142
<v Speaker 2>I also understood that a long time ago, and in

0:13:44.182 --> 0:13:47.222
<v Speaker 2>the sixties, when I was a child, there was very

0:13:47.262 --> 0:13:52.062
<v Speaker 2>little ability to say something about a respected adult and

0:13:52.142 --> 0:13:56.342
<v Speaker 2>be believed. And especially if a child, a small child,

0:13:56.462 --> 0:13:59.982
<v Speaker 2>was talking about parts of the body or something that

0:14:00.102 --> 0:14:03.902
<v Speaker 2>was regarded as rude or shocking for a child to say,

0:14:04.622 --> 0:14:06.942
<v Speaker 2>it was very hard for them to get the message across.

0:14:07.022 --> 0:14:11.942
<v Speaker 2>And I remember getting very very sternly treated when I

0:14:12.022 --> 0:14:15.062
<v Speaker 2>was trying to tell people who should have known, and

0:14:15.102 --> 0:14:17.222
<v Speaker 2>I used, at about the age of six or seven,

0:14:17.342 --> 0:14:21.182
<v Speaker 2>use the word penis to try to tell the message,

0:14:21.622 --> 0:14:27.062
<v Speaker 2>and I got hit really using that word. So I

0:14:27.742 --> 0:14:31.102
<v Speaker 2>didn't bother to tell anyone sell the same people again

0:14:31.182 --> 0:14:32.222
<v Speaker 2>until I was an adult.

0:14:33.302 --> 0:14:36.382
<v Speaker 1>Just goes to show, though I would hope that nowadays,

0:14:37.062 --> 0:14:40.302
<v Speaker 1>you know, young children, I'm teaching my two year old

0:14:40.422 --> 0:14:43.782
<v Speaker 1>about consent or trying to yes, teaching him about body parts, like,

0:14:43.822 --> 0:14:45.222
<v Speaker 1>we're just so much more knowledgeable.

0:14:45.262 --> 0:14:47.782
<v Speaker 2>We are so much more knowledgeable there seem to be

0:14:48.142 --> 0:14:51.422
<v Speaker 2>in that generation of people. They weren't all like this,

0:14:51.542 --> 0:14:55.342
<v Speaker 2>but there was such a people just take a sharp

0:14:55.382 --> 0:14:58.022
<v Speaker 2>intake of breath at the mention of anything sexual. It

0:14:58.102 --> 0:15:01.862
<v Speaker 2>was also behind the curtain, and so I think it's

0:15:01.862 --> 0:15:05.542
<v Speaker 2>so much more healthy that everyone just takes sexual matters

0:15:05.582 --> 0:15:08.262
<v Speaker 2>in their stride and it's not something that only people

0:15:08.342 --> 0:15:11.382
<v Speaker 2>of a certain age can talk about it in hush tones.

0:15:12.822 --> 0:15:14.742
<v Speaker 2>So good for you with your little boy.

0:15:15.422 --> 0:15:18.462
<v Speaker 1>You've been involved in so many high profile cases during

0:15:18.462 --> 0:15:21.662
<v Speaker 1>your time as a prosecutor and crime prosecutor, too many

0:15:21.702 --> 0:15:23.182
<v Speaker 1>to touch on in this episode, so I want to

0:15:23.222 --> 0:15:25.902
<v Speaker 1>hone in on one the scaff gang rapes. Would you

0:15:25.942 --> 0:15:29.502
<v Speaker 1>say that it's among one of the cases you're asked

0:15:29.502 --> 0:15:30.142
<v Speaker 1>about the most.

0:15:30.342 --> 0:15:33.462
<v Speaker 2>Yes, I'm asked about that the most, really the most.

0:15:33.662 --> 0:15:34.542
<v Speaker 1>Why do you think that is?

0:15:35.462 --> 0:15:39.662
<v Speaker 2>There's a few reasons. Those offenses took place in August

0:15:39.702 --> 0:15:42.542
<v Speaker 2>two thousand, so it was kind of a change of

0:15:42.822 --> 0:15:46.142
<v Speaker 2>history in a sense, and it was just before the Olympics.

0:15:46.742 --> 0:15:51.022
<v Speaker 2>The occurrence of the crimes was a bit concealed by

0:15:51.062 --> 0:15:55.182
<v Speaker 2>authorities at the time, so that there wasn't a huge panic.

0:15:55.862 --> 0:16:00.782
<v Speaker 2>But there were fifteen men in a gang, not always

0:16:01.182 --> 0:16:06.262
<v Speaker 2>all all together, but easily able with the relatively new

0:16:06.422 --> 0:16:10.662
<v Speaker 2>invention of mobile phones to get together and to have

0:16:10.782 --> 0:16:15.022
<v Speaker 2>sort of a military type operation, just so that there'd

0:16:15.022 --> 0:16:20.142
<v Speaker 2>be literally shifts of men coming in to assault a

0:16:20.182 --> 0:16:24.622
<v Speaker 2>young woman or two. It was really shocking. The mobile

0:16:24.662 --> 0:16:28.182
<v Speaker 2>telephones gave us a lot more detail, and so too

0:16:28.302 --> 0:16:34.462
<v Speaker 2>did the victims were extremely articulate and well able to

0:16:34.542 --> 0:16:39.182
<v Speaker 2>give so many descriptions of what happened. One victim in particular,

0:16:39.542 --> 0:16:43.422
<v Speaker 2>who was involved with this gang over six hours and

0:16:43.582 --> 0:16:49.422
<v Speaker 2>four locations. Her memory of it was so impressive because

0:16:49.502 --> 0:16:51.942
<v Speaker 2>not just because there was a lot of detail in

0:16:52.142 --> 0:16:56.782
<v Speaker 2>a statement that can happen anytime and a prosecutor or

0:16:56.782 --> 0:16:59.782
<v Speaker 2>a police officer isn't sure whether it's true or not,

0:17:00.222 --> 0:17:02.582
<v Speaker 2>but so much of the detail was able to be

0:17:02.742 --> 0:17:06.342
<v Speaker 2>checked because of the other relatively new thing of CCTV

0:17:06.502 --> 0:17:10.542
<v Speaker 2>on a railway station. But even details like the one

0:17:10.582 --> 0:17:15.062
<v Speaker 2>in the yellow jumper had something to do with his

0:17:15.422 --> 0:17:19.702
<v Speaker 2>private area, and that turned out to be true, and

0:17:19.742 --> 0:17:23.622
<v Speaker 2>so she was. So she just took it all in,

0:17:23.982 --> 0:17:28.262
<v Speaker 2>even through the stress of probably believing at the end

0:17:28.302 --> 0:17:31.942
<v Speaker 2>she might be killed, just going through something so terrible,

0:17:31.942 --> 0:17:36.742
<v Speaker 2>but remembering so accurately because mobile phones backed up what

0:17:36.822 --> 0:17:39.222
<v Speaker 2>she said about he left and he came back, and

0:17:39.262 --> 0:17:42.822
<v Speaker 2>so forth, and mobile phones I suppose that this was

0:17:42.902 --> 0:17:47.742
<v Speaker 2>the first case where mobile phones were used so much

0:17:47.782 --> 0:17:52.022
<v Speaker 2>in the detection of the offenders. And I learned things

0:17:52.302 --> 0:17:56.302
<v Speaker 2>like a mobile tower being able to say not just

0:17:56.342 --> 0:17:58.782
<v Speaker 2>that it's picked up on that tower, but which of

0:17:58.862 --> 0:18:02.702
<v Speaker 2>three sectors the direction of the call comes from. So

0:18:02.822 --> 0:18:05.822
<v Speaker 2>even if some of the offenders lived close to the

0:18:06.262 --> 0:18:09.822
<v Speaker 2>mobile tower, their home wasn't in the correct sector, and

0:18:09.902 --> 0:18:12.662
<v Speaker 2>so they were they were found out that way. And

0:18:12.782 --> 0:18:16.382
<v Speaker 2>the other interesting thing about the mobile telephone that I

0:18:16.462 --> 0:18:21.302
<v Speaker 2>learned then and we'll never forget, is during the offenses,

0:18:21.982 --> 0:18:25.462
<v Speaker 2>Miss c as she was called by the court, heard

0:18:25.622 --> 0:18:28.822
<v Speaker 2>her own ring tone her phone had been taken from her,

0:18:28.982 --> 0:18:31.942
<v Speaker 2>and heard her ring tone, which was the real slim

0:18:31.942 --> 0:18:36.222
<v Speaker 2>shady eminem two thousan. Yes, that's right. She saw one

0:18:36.222 --> 0:18:39.102
<v Speaker 2>of the offenders at his phone with that and saw

0:18:39.142 --> 0:18:41.982
<v Speaker 2>it was her phone. But in the end they gave

0:18:42.022 --> 0:18:44.902
<v Speaker 2>her back her phone. But he had put his SIM

0:18:44.902 --> 0:18:47.222
<v Speaker 2>card in there because he liked the phone ring tone

0:18:47.302 --> 0:18:51.422
<v Speaker 2>or both and used it that night. Perhaps he used

0:18:51.422 --> 0:18:54.542
<v Speaker 2>it to ring people and didn't want it on his phone,

0:18:54.622 --> 0:18:57.422
<v Speaker 2>or was or who knows, probably as simple as wanted

0:18:57.462 --> 0:19:01.382
<v Speaker 2>to try that phone out. But then, as I learned

0:19:01.422 --> 0:19:04.742
<v Speaker 2>for the first time in the preparation for that case.

0:19:05.342 --> 0:19:08.982
<v Speaker 2>Every phone, even then the old Nokias, the phone sends

0:19:08.982 --> 0:19:11.742
<v Speaker 2>a message of the call, and the SIM card sends

0:19:11.782 --> 0:19:14.462
<v Speaker 2>a separate message of the call, so it could be

0:19:14.502 --> 0:19:18.262
<v Speaker 2>proved that the call was made with his sim card

0:19:18.342 --> 0:19:21.182
<v Speaker 2>and her phone, so that linked them so that he

0:19:21.182 --> 0:19:23.142
<v Speaker 2>couldn't get out of it at all, even though of

0:19:23.182 --> 0:19:25.222
<v Speaker 2>course he said I was at home, it wasn't me,

0:19:25.502 --> 0:19:27.182
<v Speaker 2>someone who looked like me, and so forth.

0:19:27.342 --> 0:19:31.182
<v Speaker 1>So this kind of technological side of investigation that was

0:19:31.222 --> 0:19:31.782
<v Speaker 1>fairly new.

0:19:32.022 --> 0:19:35.102
<v Speaker 2>Yes, it really was. It was the first sexual assault

0:19:35.102 --> 0:19:39.142
<v Speaker 2>case I'd ever done that was investigated like a murder.

0:19:40.022 --> 0:19:42.862
<v Speaker 1>Because I've heard it said that the brief of evidence

0:19:42.902 --> 0:19:46.022
<v Speaker 1>that you got was as good as you would get

0:19:46.022 --> 0:19:49.422
<v Speaker 1>from a murder, which is impressive in a sexual assault case.

0:19:49.542 --> 0:19:52.182
<v Speaker 2>It really was, And it was such a big strike

0:19:52.302 --> 0:19:56.942
<v Speaker 2>force of about a dozen fantastic detectives who many of

0:19:56.942 --> 0:20:00.262
<v Speaker 2>whom had homicide experience. They did it like that, So

0:20:00.302 --> 0:20:03.982
<v Speaker 2>it was not just a usual case of at that

0:20:04.142 --> 0:20:08.782
<v Speaker 2>time of alleged sexual assault, where there'd be a statement

0:20:08.822 --> 0:20:12.062
<v Speaker 2>from the complainant and perhaps a statement from a doctor

0:20:12.622 --> 0:20:15.822
<v Speaker 2>and a statement from a police officer saying, we arrested

0:20:16.142 --> 0:20:18.102
<v Speaker 2>the guy and he wouldn't say anything, and that's that,

0:20:18.582 --> 0:20:21.262
<v Speaker 2>and that was all you got. But in this case

0:20:21.382 --> 0:20:25.542
<v Speaker 2>there was so much more CCTV and all the phone evidence,

0:20:25.582 --> 0:20:26.702
<v Speaker 2>which was fascinating.

0:20:26.742 --> 0:20:28.982
<v Speaker 1>Which makes your job easier, right, I mean, it's not

0:20:29.062 --> 0:20:32.382
<v Speaker 1>an easier case, but you want as much detail as possible.

0:20:32.182 --> 0:20:35.822
<v Speaker 2>That's right. And as much as we know that it

0:20:35.902 --> 0:20:40.942
<v Speaker 2>still doesn't prove whether sexual intercourse is rape or not.

0:20:41.422 --> 0:20:44.062
<v Speaker 2>In a case like this, it sure does. In the

0:20:44.102 --> 0:20:47.982
<v Speaker 2>back of buildings, with men coming and going, different cars

0:20:48.022 --> 0:20:50.982
<v Speaker 2>coming and going, and more and more offenses taking place,

0:20:52.142 --> 0:20:56.022
<v Speaker 2>it was obvious that that complainant and all the other

0:20:56.062 --> 0:21:00.422
<v Speaker 2>complainants were there against their will and certainly not consenting

0:21:00.462 --> 0:21:11.222
<v Speaker 2>to these waves of men who were arriving.

0:21:13.982 --> 0:21:16.462
<v Speaker 1>Can you tell us a little bit more about the

0:21:16.542 --> 0:21:19.462
<v Speaker 1>names that people might remember, and it's the reason it's

0:21:19.502 --> 0:21:22.982
<v Speaker 1>called the Scaff rape. So the Muhammad and Blal scaff

0:21:22.982 --> 0:21:24.702
<v Speaker 1>who were the kind of ring leaders or Balal was

0:21:24.702 --> 0:21:25.262
<v Speaker 1>the ring leader?

0:21:25.422 --> 0:21:27.382
<v Speaker 2>Yes, what was the setup?

0:21:27.422 --> 0:21:29.382
<v Speaker 1>They were the brothers that were kind of running it.

0:21:29.742 --> 0:21:32.542
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, they were in a sense. Bill Al was

0:21:32.862 --> 0:21:38.142
<v Speaker 2>always involved and Muhammed was a bit of a runner

0:21:38.182 --> 0:21:42.382
<v Speaker 2>for him. Muhammed was only sixteen at the time and

0:21:43.382 --> 0:21:47.822
<v Speaker 2>he well he's still in the news, Yes he is.

0:21:49.502 --> 0:21:53.502
<v Speaker 2>He's still in the news. But he was sixteen and

0:21:53.542 --> 0:21:57.742
<v Speaker 2>bill Al was eighteen. I'm not trying to take away

0:21:57.782 --> 0:22:01.422
<v Speaker 2>from their crimes, but there was something. There were a

0:22:01.462 --> 0:22:05.622
<v Speaker 2>few features in their upbringing that seemed to scream out

0:22:05.662 --> 0:22:11.382
<v Speaker 2>that they weren't necessarily brought up to respect young Australian women. Yeah,

0:22:11.422 --> 0:22:16.142
<v Speaker 2>that was very clear from their supporters and members of

0:22:16.182 --> 0:22:20.742
<v Speaker 2>their family and the way that they would harass the victims,

0:22:20.862 --> 0:22:24.702
<v Speaker 2>well at the time complainants, but imagine that that women

0:22:25.302 --> 0:22:27.342
<v Speaker 2>associated with them were harassing.

0:22:28.302 --> 0:22:31.062
<v Speaker 1>Well, you're kind of touching around the edges on the

0:22:31.182 --> 0:22:34.542
<v Speaker 1>racial motivation side of this case, which is kind of

0:22:34.542 --> 0:22:37.222
<v Speaker 1>what the media ran with. You know, it got this

0:22:37.422 --> 0:22:41.142
<v Speaker 1>huge This is a racially motivated attack and it kind

0:22:41.142 --> 0:22:44.022
<v Speaker 1>of was stemming from the fact that the victims were

0:22:44.062 --> 0:22:47.342
<v Speaker 1>being called things like ossie pigs. You deserve it because

0:22:47.342 --> 0:22:52.102
<v Speaker 1>you're Australian. How did that side of things overtake this case,

0:22:52.102 --> 0:22:53.102
<v Speaker 1>particularly in the media.

0:22:53.342 --> 0:22:56.822
<v Speaker 2>Yes, Well, as I've always said, I wouldn't have ever

0:22:56.982 --> 0:23:00.982
<v Speaker 2>mentioned any racial aspect of it, except that those were

0:23:01.022 --> 0:23:04.102
<v Speaker 2>the words that were said by some of the offenders

0:23:04.462 --> 0:23:08.222
<v Speaker 2>during the rapes, and so they brought it on themselves

0:23:08.262 --> 0:23:13.302
<v Speaker 2>in a sense. But that was very bad for the

0:23:13.422 --> 0:23:17.982
<v Speaker 2>Lebanese community, very bad because they wore it all and

0:23:18.022 --> 0:23:21.662
<v Speaker 2>every Lebanese person you know, felt like that the finger

0:23:21.702 --> 0:23:24.222
<v Speaker 2>had been pointed at them, and that was most unfair,

0:23:24.382 --> 0:23:28.622
<v Speaker 2>most unfair, because this is a very tiny proportion of

0:23:28.662 --> 0:23:32.462
<v Speaker 2>people who would act like this, and it's very very unfair.

0:23:32.502 --> 0:23:35.222
<v Speaker 2>And in the book I do tell the story about

0:23:35.502 --> 0:23:37.622
<v Speaker 2>naming the offenders because.

0:23:37.422 --> 0:23:39.182
<v Speaker 1>They were under suppression because they were kids.

0:23:39.382 --> 0:23:42.542
<v Speaker 2>Yes, that's right, and even the naming bill Al's name

0:23:42.582 --> 0:23:45.862
<v Speaker 2>would have would have named Muhammad or in a sense

0:23:45.902 --> 0:23:50.262
<v Speaker 2>because brothers and everything like that. But I made the submission.

0:23:50.302 --> 0:23:53.622
<v Speaker 2>In the end, I didn't know whether I should or not,

0:23:53.702 --> 0:23:56.382
<v Speaker 2>but I made the submission to name them after a

0:23:56.622 --> 0:24:00.782
<v Speaker 2>young Muslim law student who I was teaching at the time, lecturing,

0:24:01.302 --> 0:24:05.222
<v Speaker 2>said they've got to be named otherwise our whole community

0:24:05.422 --> 0:24:07.222
<v Speaker 2>has to wear it, that it should be put the

0:24:07.222 --> 0:24:09.702
<v Speaker 2>blame should be put on the people who did it,

0:24:09.982 --> 0:24:12.982
<v Speaker 2>not on the whole community, and that you can't argue

0:24:12.982 --> 0:24:16.102
<v Speaker 2>with logic like that. And the judge agreed, and so

0:24:16.222 --> 0:24:21.822
<v Speaker 2>they were all named, and whilst their names now are

0:24:21.862 --> 0:24:25.222
<v Speaker 2>so well known, but it is better than blaming a

0:24:25.262 --> 0:24:26.342
<v Speaker 2>whole racial group.

0:24:26.542 --> 0:24:30.222
<v Speaker 1>Definitely. It's a shame we don't really know the other

0:24:30.302 --> 0:24:32.822
<v Speaker 1>names as well, you know, we just know the Scaff brothers.

0:24:33.062 --> 0:24:36.422
<v Speaker 2>Yes, well they were named. But because there were two

0:24:36.422 --> 0:24:39.582
<v Speaker 2>Scaffs and Bill al was in all the trials, they're

0:24:39.582 --> 0:24:40.702
<v Speaker 2>the ones that have worn it.

0:24:40.942 --> 0:24:42.982
<v Speaker 1>How were they caught in the end? Was it with

0:24:43.022 --> 0:24:44.182
<v Speaker 1>the mobile phones that did.

0:24:44.302 --> 0:24:47.582
<v Speaker 2>Yes, that was the main thing, the mobile phones. But

0:24:47.622 --> 0:24:51.422
<v Speaker 2>not all were caught. Only nine of the fifteen were caught,

0:24:52.142 --> 0:24:56.302
<v Speaker 2>and one or two of them did got almost nothing

0:24:56.622 --> 0:25:01.182
<v Speaker 2>really because certain proofs weren't available against them. There are

0:25:01.222 --> 0:25:03.462
<v Speaker 2>five or six who got away with it.

0:25:04.462 --> 0:25:05.342
<v Speaker 1>And so we will never know.

0:25:05.702 --> 0:25:10.302
<v Speaker 2>No, probably not, probably not. I don't think there's DNA,

0:25:10.942 --> 0:25:14.102
<v Speaker 2>but you never know. There was so much DNA taken

0:25:14.622 --> 0:25:17.862
<v Speaker 2>and methods of DNA keep coming back.

0:25:18.022 --> 0:25:20.982
<v Speaker 1>There ended up being a number of trials in this gaff.

0:25:21.662 --> 0:25:22.462
<v Speaker 2>Yes, gang reps.

0:25:22.622 --> 0:25:23.702
<v Speaker 1>Were you involved in all of them?

0:25:23.862 --> 0:25:26.702
<v Speaker 2>Yes? I was, and so in fact in the end

0:25:28.582 --> 0:25:33.142
<v Speaker 2>there were trials involving four complainants, two in one trial

0:25:33.382 --> 0:25:38.902
<v Speaker 2>and two separate other ones, and there were other complainants

0:25:38.942 --> 0:25:44.262
<v Speaker 2>where there were pleas of guilty entered that they were

0:25:44.342 --> 0:25:47.822
<v Speaker 2>a little less serious. But by then the offenders knew

0:25:47.822 --> 0:25:50.662
<v Speaker 2>that they were going to jail anyway, and they might

0:25:50.702 --> 0:25:54.062
<v Speaker 2>as well fess up to some of the others. And

0:25:54.222 --> 0:25:58.182
<v Speaker 2>the point had been made and long sentences were imposed.

0:25:58.982 --> 0:26:01.062
<v Speaker 2>Bill E's still in None of the others.

0:26:00.742 --> 0:26:04.422
<v Speaker 1>Are He's the only ones still in prison? Yes, because

0:26:04.422 --> 0:26:06.302
<v Speaker 1>something that stands out to me when you look back

0:26:06.302 --> 0:26:09.622
<v Speaker 1>at this case is how they acted in court. There

0:26:09.662 --> 0:26:11.022
<v Speaker 1>was no remorse, was there?

0:26:11.182 --> 0:26:14.822
<v Speaker 2>Oh no, they were laughing. They were terribly badly behaved.

0:26:15.022 --> 0:26:22.102
<v Speaker 2>But it must be said that that they weren't very bright.

0:26:23.102 --> 0:26:28.262
<v Speaker 2>You know, they were tested and their IQs were exceedingly low.

0:26:28.582 --> 0:26:31.462
<v Speaker 2>You know, that's something that has to go into the

0:26:31.462 --> 0:26:36.062
<v Speaker 2>mix about whether they it was almost borderline on whether

0:26:36.062 --> 0:26:39.222
<v Speaker 2>they should be sentenced as hard as people with average

0:26:39.622 --> 0:26:41.062
<v Speaker 2>at least average intelligence.

0:26:41.502 --> 0:26:44.542
<v Speaker 1>But like laughing in court and falling asleep.

0:26:44.142 --> 0:26:49.982
<v Speaker 2>Throwing things at people and yes, laughing and disappearing and

0:26:50.462 --> 0:26:54.382
<v Speaker 2>being on the ground and screaming out things, and they

0:26:54.862 --> 0:26:58.302
<v Speaker 2>clearly had no respect for the judicial system. Do you

0:26:58.342 --> 0:27:01.182
<v Speaker 2>know that something happened to me only about a month

0:27:01.262 --> 0:27:06.102
<v Speaker 2>or two ago and I didn't even expect to tell

0:27:06.102 --> 0:27:08.462
<v Speaker 2>you this today because it just came back into my

0:27:08.502 --> 0:27:12.022
<v Speaker 2>mind thinking about the other offenders. One of the other

0:27:12.102 --> 0:27:17.702
<v Speaker 2>offenders who was right in there with and his name

0:27:18.502 --> 0:27:22.542
<v Speaker 2>was MG. It was and it became I was taken

0:27:22.582 --> 0:27:26.182
<v Speaker 2>off a retrial in relation to him because of a lecture,

0:27:26.822 --> 0:27:30.262
<v Speaker 2>so he ended up and because that trial didn't succeed,

0:27:31.022 --> 0:27:34.462
<v Speaker 2>even though he did time for one in which it

0:27:34.502 --> 0:27:37.382
<v Speaker 2>did succeed. I do believe that he was involved in

0:27:37.742 --> 0:27:41.342
<v Speaker 2>the other case that he was acquitted of because he

0:27:41.662 --> 0:27:45.862
<v Speaker 2>had very distinctive hair. But anyway, I digress. Two months ago,

0:27:46.302 --> 0:27:50.062
<v Speaker 2>I was walking in Park Street, Sydney. I just got

0:27:50.102 --> 0:27:52.662
<v Speaker 2>out of an uber with some friends who were going

0:27:52.702 --> 0:27:55.262
<v Speaker 2>a different way and I was just going to peel

0:27:55.302 --> 0:27:57.782
<v Speaker 2>off and I was crossing Park Street to go and

0:27:57.782 --> 0:28:00.782
<v Speaker 2>get a cab or bus or whatever. It was dark,

0:28:01.462 --> 0:28:06.462
<v Speaker 2>and there was a beautiful white Ferrari purring at the lights.

0:28:07.382 --> 0:28:10.182
<v Speaker 2>And I do like cars a lot, and it had

0:28:10.182 --> 0:28:13.022
<v Speaker 2>gone old trim and it was really new and I'd

0:28:13.062 --> 0:28:16.062
<v Speaker 2>never seen such a beautiful Ferrari and it was making

0:28:16.102 --> 0:28:18.862
<v Speaker 2>this beautiful noise. And I must confess that as I

0:28:18.902 --> 0:28:21.662
<v Speaker 2>walked across in front of it, in the dark. I

0:28:21.702 --> 0:28:25.822
<v Speaker 2>was looking for it and looking at it, looking at everything,

0:28:26.222 --> 0:28:28.342
<v Speaker 2>and did not looking at the driver. When I got

0:28:28.342 --> 0:28:31.582
<v Speaker 2>to the other side, the window wound down and said Margaret,

0:28:32.102 --> 0:28:33.462
<v Speaker 2>and I said hello, and he said do you know

0:28:33.502 --> 0:28:36.302
<v Speaker 2>who it is? And I said no, but I like

0:28:36.382 --> 0:28:40.622
<v Speaker 2>your car and he said it's it's MG and he

0:28:40.782 --> 0:28:43.982
<v Speaker 2>sped off. And I wasn't frightened or anything, because he

0:28:44.022 --> 0:28:46.582
<v Speaker 2>had a big smile on his face. And my goodness,

0:28:46.622 --> 0:28:48.102
<v Speaker 2>he's got a Ferrari and I haven't.

0:28:49.302 --> 0:28:51.022
<v Speaker 1>But that's so many decades later as well.

0:28:51.142 --> 0:28:54.542
<v Speaker 2>Yes, yes, but I suppose my face is still about.

0:28:55.102 --> 0:29:01.582
<v Speaker 2>And I am told as recently as yesterday that criminals

0:29:01.622 --> 0:29:03.422
<v Speaker 2>in jail's talk about lawyers a lot.

0:29:07.142 --> 0:29:08.062
<v Speaker 1>That's so eerie.

0:29:08.142 --> 0:29:11.382
<v Speaker 2>Though, yes, it was so eerie. Idn't even believe it.

0:29:11.902 --> 0:29:13.942
<v Speaker 2>And I texted my friends and I said, you can't

0:29:13.982 --> 0:29:15.982
<v Speaker 2>believe what just happened. I'm just telling you in case

0:29:16.022 --> 0:29:20.742
<v Speaker 2>anything happens now. But he wasn't menacing, but he wanted

0:29:20.742 --> 0:29:23.022
<v Speaker 2>you to know he was there. Though he was pretty

0:29:23.062 --> 0:29:25.262
<v Speaker 2>triumphant well.

0:29:25.102 --> 0:29:27.222
<v Speaker 1>As you were mentioning. And I want to dig into

0:29:27.222 --> 0:29:31.422
<v Speaker 1>it because he was acquitted of one OF's charges. Tell

0:29:31.422 --> 0:29:33.502
<v Speaker 1>me about being taken off the retrial.

0:29:34.102 --> 0:29:37.822
<v Speaker 2>Yes, well, it is an interesting case, and I think

0:29:37.942 --> 0:29:40.062
<v Speaker 2>a wrong case. I do think it was a wrong

0:29:40.102 --> 0:29:44.102
<v Speaker 2>case because I was invited to give a prestigious lecture

0:29:44.262 --> 0:29:47.502
<v Speaker 2>in two thousand and five to the University of Newcastle.

0:29:48.142 --> 0:29:51.222
<v Speaker 2>It's called the Sinninian Stephen Lecture, and I was one

0:29:51.302 --> 0:29:54.862
<v Speaker 2>of the few people more lowly than a judge who'd

0:29:54.902 --> 0:29:59.222
<v Speaker 2>ever been invited to do it, and the Dean paid

0:29:59.262 --> 0:30:01.422
<v Speaker 2>me a great honor in asking me, and so I

0:30:01.582 --> 0:30:06.262
<v Speaker 2>prepared a lecture. It's a lecture very carefully and most

0:30:06.342 --> 0:30:08.742
<v Speaker 2>of it wasn't about any cases at all. Most of

0:30:08.782 --> 0:30:10.982
<v Speaker 2>it was to try to be in s firing to

0:30:11.102 --> 0:30:14.062
<v Speaker 2>the first year law students who were the target audience,

0:30:14.222 --> 0:30:17.662
<v Speaker 2>about the power that that one gets from being a

0:30:17.742 --> 0:30:20.542
<v Speaker 2>lawyer and how to be good with it and how

0:30:20.622 --> 0:30:23.582
<v Speaker 2>you know. I even said such things as it would

0:30:23.582 --> 0:30:26.622
<v Speaker 2>be the worst nightmare of a prosecutor to think that

0:30:26.702 --> 0:30:31.062
<v Speaker 2>he or she had prosecuted someone who was actually not guilty.

0:30:31.582 --> 0:30:33.662
<v Speaker 1>But she's a pretty obvious thing, you would think, I

0:30:33.662 --> 0:30:34.142
<v Speaker 1>would think.

0:30:34.182 --> 0:30:38.502
<v Speaker 2>So I hope that that always is the case. And

0:30:38.542 --> 0:30:42.502
<v Speaker 2>so I thought it was good. But the Dean had

0:30:42.542 --> 0:30:44.782
<v Speaker 2>asked me to comment because he said, so many of

0:30:44.782 --> 0:30:48.102
<v Speaker 2>the students wonder why all the scaff cases are still

0:30:48.302 --> 0:30:51.382
<v Speaker 2>limping on through the system, and it just hasn't come

0:30:51.462 --> 0:30:53.782
<v Speaker 2>to an end, and there's more trials and then there's

0:30:53.782 --> 0:30:57.102
<v Speaker 2>an appeal, and then there's a re trial and all

0:30:57.102 --> 0:31:00.462
<v Speaker 2>that business. So I just gave a bit of a

0:31:00.542 --> 0:31:03.902
<v Speaker 2>background of the allegations and the way it's gone through

0:31:03.942 --> 0:31:07.022
<v Speaker 2>the courts. And I didn't even mention their names. I

0:31:07.022 --> 0:31:09.302
<v Speaker 2>don't know if the names were public by them, probably not.

0:31:09.902 --> 0:31:13.142
<v Speaker 2>I didn't mention their names. I mentioned them by initials

0:31:13.262 --> 0:31:16.342
<v Speaker 2>so as to differentiate the cases and make it clear.

0:31:16.382 --> 0:31:19.342
<v Speaker 2>And this is a university lecture, and it's pretty normal

0:31:19.862 --> 0:31:24.022
<v Speaker 2>for lawyers to be able to lecture student lawyers about

0:31:24.102 --> 0:31:29.302
<v Speaker 2>cases even though they're still ongoing. When you're just mentioning

0:31:29.342 --> 0:31:32.262
<v Speaker 2>the things that are in the public domain, about the

0:31:32.982 --> 0:31:37.422
<v Speaker 2>course of the trials and the appeals, and why they're

0:31:37.462 --> 0:31:40.902
<v Speaker 2>still going five years after the offenses and we're still

0:31:40.942 --> 0:31:43.542
<v Speaker 2>going for years after that. In two thousand and seven,

0:31:43.582 --> 0:31:47.702
<v Speaker 2>when the fellow, now he's now got a ferrari, was

0:31:47.822 --> 0:31:51.582
<v Speaker 2>up for trial again, some lawyers who didn't want me

0:31:51.662 --> 0:31:54.062
<v Speaker 2>in the case. That's all it was about. They've told

0:31:54.102 --> 0:31:58.022
<v Speaker 2>me since thought they'd take a point that they didn't expect,

0:31:58.302 --> 0:32:00.422
<v Speaker 2>but they thought it'd buy some time with the Court

0:32:00.462 --> 0:32:03.422
<v Speaker 2>of Criminal Appeal, saying that I should never be as

0:32:03.422 --> 0:32:05.702
<v Speaker 2>a prosecutor. I should never be talking about cases that

0:32:05.742 --> 0:32:10.342
<v Speaker 2>I might be in the future, publishing something, they said publishing.

0:32:10.502 --> 0:32:11.942
<v Speaker 2>Actually I didn't publish anything.

0:32:12.182 --> 0:32:13.942
<v Speaker 1>So you're a Crown prosecutor. You're going to know if

0:32:13.942 --> 0:32:15.742
<v Speaker 1>you're doing something that's legally dubious.

0:32:15.902 --> 0:32:20.102
<v Speaker 2>Yes, that's right. But this point was taken and a

0:32:20.182 --> 0:32:23.062
<v Speaker 2>judgment was given by the court, and leading judgment was

0:32:23.102 --> 0:32:25.662
<v Speaker 2>then a judge who later went on to have some

0:32:25.782 --> 0:32:29.702
<v Speaker 2>experience in sexual assault, but who said since I didn't

0:32:29.782 --> 0:32:33.062
<v Speaker 2>know how bad it was for victims for years, but

0:32:33.422 --> 0:32:35.182
<v Speaker 2>he took me off it. He took me off the

0:32:35.182 --> 0:32:37.022
<v Speaker 2>case and said I shouldn't be in it because I've

0:32:37.102 --> 0:32:39.422
<v Speaker 2>made public comments about a case I might be in.

0:32:40.102 --> 0:32:43.422
<v Speaker 2>And so the victim didn't come back. She didn't want

0:32:43.422 --> 0:32:46.022
<v Speaker 2>to come back again, and they changed the legislation so

0:32:46.102 --> 0:32:48.422
<v Speaker 2>that her evidence could be read and so forth. But

0:32:48.582 --> 0:32:49.382
<v Speaker 2>it wasn't.

0:32:50.622 --> 0:32:52.662
<v Speaker 1>She didn't come back again because you were taken off.

0:32:52.742 --> 0:32:56.262
<v Speaker 2>Yes, that's right, And I promised her that I would

0:32:56.302 --> 0:33:00.462
<v Speaker 2>stay with her through it always and I couldn't keep

0:33:00.502 --> 0:33:04.782
<v Speaker 2>my promise, but I'd go to anyway, and someone else

0:33:05.302 --> 0:33:07.702
<v Speaker 2>did the case, not with the same knowledge. I'm not

0:33:07.742 --> 0:33:10.542
<v Speaker 2>being at all critical, but there are things that had

0:33:10.542 --> 0:33:12.262
<v Speaker 2>to be put across to a jury anyway, it was

0:33:12.302 --> 0:33:17.942
<v Speaker 2>not successful. So Ferrari man, Well, anyway, I shouldn't say that,

0:33:18.022 --> 0:33:20.222
<v Speaker 2>because you have to be things have to be proved

0:33:20.222 --> 0:33:24.662
<v Speaker 2>beyond reasonable doubt, and it wasn't. And that's exactly how

0:33:24.702 --> 0:33:28.582
<v Speaker 2>the court, the system should should prevail. But that's just

0:33:28.742 --> 0:33:32.262
<v Speaker 2>my thoughts, and maybe I've gone too far yet again, but.

0:33:33.022 --> 0:33:34.542
<v Speaker 1>So well, as far as we know, none of them

0:33:34.542 --> 0:33:36.262
<v Speaker 1>are doing appeals right now, so if fine.

0:33:36.142 --> 0:33:37.862
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's right. I think we're allowed to talk about

0:33:37.902 --> 0:33:40.462
<v Speaker 2>it now. And that's just my view, no one else's view.

0:33:41.262 --> 0:33:44.342
<v Speaker 1>It's well known though that it's very hard to get

0:33:44.382 --> 0:33:48.302
<v Speaker 1>a rape conviction, and even looking at this case, you know,

0:33:48.342 --> 0:33:51.702
<v Speaker 1>the amount of appeals and the amount of charges that

0:33:51.862 --> 0:33:52.862
<v Speaker 1>weren't able.

0:33:52.622 --> 0:33:55.902
<v Speaker 2>To it was much harder than than it is now.

0:33:56.142 --> 0:34:00.622
<v Speaker 1>But why do these cases struggle so much compared to like, I.

0:34:00.542 --> 0:34:03.302
<v Speaker 2>Don't think they do really really, yes, I think there's

0:34:03.342 --> 0:34:07.382
<v Speaker 2>plenty of people being convicted nowadays. Oh, yes, plenty of

0:34:07.382 --> 0:34:11.182
<v Speaker 2>people being convicted, and in fact there's few people being

0:34:11.222 --> 0:34:16.742
<v Speaker 2>convicted where perhaps you know an appeal will produce a

0:34:16.742 --> 0:34:21.902
<v Speaker 2>different result. And if one looks at the raw statistics

0:34:21.902 --> 0:34:24.462
<v Speaker 2>about how many convictions there are, and I don't even

0:34:24.502 --> 0:34:27.022
<v Speaker 2>think that's changed a lot. If it is said that

0:34:27.062 --> 0:34:32.222
<v Speaker 2>there's any slight reduction in conviction rates, it's because there

0:34:32.222 --> 0:34:36.222
<v Speaker 2>are so many more complaints now. And I don't want

0:34:36.262 --> 0:34:39.062
<v Speaker 2>to offend anyone, and I hope that everyone understands what

0:34:39.102 --> 0:34:46.382
<v Speaker 2>I'm saying, but that in terms of seriousness objectively, and

0:34:46.462 --> 0:34:50.502
<v Speaker 2>I know that for every victim it's their subjective feeling.

0:34:50.582 --> 0:34:53.582
<v Speaker 2>But there are so many cases now in relation to

0:34:54.502 --> 0:34:59.182
<v Speaker 2>well relationships sex that is, one person thinks it's been

0:34:59.222 --> 0:35:03.142
<v Speaker 2>agreed to and one person doesn't, and perhaps it could

0:35:03.142 --> 0:35:06.862
<v Speaker 2>be in the context of consensual sex to a certain

0:35:06.902 --> 0:35:11.422
<v Speaker 2>extent or a certain number of times, and then something more.

0:35:11.742 --> 0:35:16.542
<v Speaker 2>I'm not diminishing anyone's experience, but they're also harder to prove,

0:35:16.822 --> 0:35:21.302
<v Speaker 2>because the more aspects of things that are done to

0:35:21.302 --> 0:35:25.342
<v Speaker 2>someone that are against their will, the easier it is

0:35:25.382 --> 0:35:29.542
<v Speaker 2>to prove. So, just as an example, if the complainant

0:35:29.622 --> 0:35:33.542
<v Speaker 2>has removed her own clothes, gone somewhere private, got into

0:35:33.622 --> 0:35:36.262
<v Speaker 2>bed with someone, decided to sleep with someone. It's going

0:35:36.302 --> 0:35:39.662
<v Speaker 2>to be a bit harder to prove that there wasn't

0:35:39.982 --> 0:35:43.542
<v Speaker 2>consent to something happening. It's just a bit harder to

0:35:43.622 --> 0:35:45.742
<v Speaker 2>prove because there are two sides to the story, and

0:35:45.822 --> 0:35:48.742
<v Speaker 2>the truth of the matter is no one really knows

0:35:48.902 --> 0:35:50.422
<v Speaker 2>except those two people.

0:35:50.302 --> 0:35:52.182
<v Speaker 1>Which is hard to hear. Like you say, but you're

0:35:52.222 --> 0:35:56.542
<v Speaker 1>speaking from like a courtroom perspective, through a lawyer's eyes.

0:35:56.622 --> 0:36:00.422
<v Speaker 1>It's much harder to distinguishes than say the scaff rapes

0:36:00.462 --> 0:36:01.262
<v Speaker 1>that we're talking about.

0:36:01.262 --> 0:36:05.742
<v Speaker 2>And there can even be each side might there might

0:36:05.782 --> 0:36:09.942
<v Speaker 2>be no dishonesty from either, but each side might remember

0:36:09.982 --> 0:36:12.662
<v Speaker 2>it in a different way. And that I suppose that's

0:36:12.702 --> 0:36:17.462
<v Speaker 2>where where communication is so important, and maybe that is

0:36:17.502 --> 0:36:21.182
<v Speaker 2>why it's a good idea to change it to let's

0:36:21.182 --> 0:36:26.062
<v Speaker 2>have the specific conversation rather than the old days of

0:36:26.502 --> 0:36:29.582
<v Speaker 2>just a look in the eye and things that came

0:36:29.662 --> 0:36:30.862
<v Speaker 2>from Hollywood movies.

0:36:31.342 --> 0:36:32.942
<v Speaker 1>You mean asking for consent.

0:36:32.782 --> 0:36:38.222
<v Speaker 2>Yes, that's it, but not just generally, because many cases

0:36:38.422 --> 0:36:42.302
<v Speaker 2>are cases where consent to certain acts have taken place,

0:36:42.342 --> 0:36:46.542
<v Speaker 2>but there's got to be ongoing consent and continuous consent

0:36:47.342 --> 0:36:51.382
<v Speaker 2>but many people say, oh, that's stupid, because you know,

0:36:51.742 --> 0:36:53.942
<v Speaker 2>I'm in a relationship and we don't talk about it

0:36:54.022 --> 0:36:57.942
<v Speaker 2>and all that. But well, perhaps everyone has to have

0:36:58.102 --> 0:37:01.142
<v Speaker 2>ground rules with people, and every couple's different.

0:37:02.102 --> 0:37:04.942
<v Speaker 1>And I would also argue that people that do feel

0:37:04.942 --> 0:37:08.542
<v Speaker 1>like they've been sexually assaulted and raped in that scenario

0:37:08.622 --> 0:37:11.142
<v Speaker 1>do deserve to be able to go to and fight

0:37:11.622 --> 0:37:12.142
<v Speaker 1>for justice.

0:37:12.262 --> 0:37:15.342
<v Speaker 2>Of course, of course they do, and they are and

0:37:15.382 --> 0:37:18.502
<v Speaker 2>they are permitted to and they're given every ability to

0:37:18.542 --> 0:37:20.342
<v Speaker 2>make it easier. They don't have to be in the

0:37:20.382 --> 0:37:22.662
<v Speaker 2>same room. They can do it by AVL, they can

0:37:22.662 --> 0:37:25.422
<v Speaker 2>have as many breaks as they like, support person, all

0:37:25.462 --> 0:37:28.622
<v Speaker 2>the things, all the things that we pioneered when I

0:37:28.702 --> 0:37:30.622
<v Speaker 2>was prosecuting these types of cases.

0:37:31.662 --> 0:37:35.582
<v Speaker 1>Well, there were some changes in criminal procedure after scuff,

0:37:35.622 --> 0:37:36.102
<v Speaker 1>weren't there.

0:37:36.262 --> 0:37:41.142
<v Speaker 2>Yes, that someone doesn't have to come back time after time.

0:37:41.262 --> 0:37:45.502
<v Speaker 2>So the evidence is recorded now audio and visual, and

0:37:45.542 --> 0:37:49.182
<v Speaker 2>so it can be used well even if the complainant

0:37:49.262 --> 0:37:51.902
<v Speaker 2>doesn't want to come back or well, it doesn't matter

0:37:51.942 --> 0:37:55.662
<v Speaker 2>whether she does or she doesn't. I mean, she could

0:37:56.422 --> 0:38:00.702
<v Speaker 2>if you wanted to, but that recording is there for

0:38:01.142 --> 0:38:01.702
<v Speaker 2>the future.

0:38:03.502 --> 0:38:07.182
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to true crime conversations with me Jemma Bath.

0:38:07.622 --> 0:38:12.102
<v Speaker 1>I'm speaking with Australian barrister and prosecutor kneen Up. Next,

0:38:12.142 --> 0:38:14.142
<v Speaker 1>I ask Margaret about the release of one of the

0:38:14.182 --> 0:38:19.542
<v Speaker 1>more high profile members of the scaff Rapes. Do you

0:38:19.582 --> 0:38:22.022
<v Speaker 1>still read the headlines on the scaff story because they

0:38:22.022 --> 0:38:24.302
<v Speaker 1>are still popping up. You mentioned Muhammad before he was

0:38:24.342 --> 0:38:27.742
<v Speaker 1>released in twenty twenty three.

0:38:28.062 --> 0:38:29.942
<v Speaker 2>Yes, I like to see how everyone's going.

0:38:31.102 --> 0:38:33.582
<v Speaker 1>And we you know, we had another complainant come forward

0:38:33.582 --> 0:38:36.382
<v Speaker 1>a few years ago. She was all over the media.

0:38:36.982 --> 0:38:38.462
<v Speaker 1>You know, it was something that was such a big

0:38:38.502 --> 0:38:39.262
<v Speaker 1>part of your life.

0:38:39.702 --> 0:38:42.422
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yes, well it was for a few years and

0:38:42.742 --> 0:38:46.022
<v Speaker 2>it certainly caused me well to be taken off.

0:38:46.142 --> 0:38:48.662
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it was a lot of your own.

0:38:49.542 --> 0:38:52.582
<v Speaker 2>But it's sort of embarrassing and yes, that's right. But

0:38:52.822 --> 0:38:56.182
<v Speaker 2>the good thing was that in the judgment, my whole

0:38:56.302 --> 0:39:01.222
<v Speaker 2>lecture is recorded, so I'm pretty proud. I'm still proud

0:39:01.222 --> 0:39:03.782
<v Speaker 2>of it and it's still a great lecture. And so

0:39:03.942 --> 0:39:06.182
<v Speaker 2>things happened for a reason. They might seem terrible at

0:39:06.222 --> 0:39:09.742
<v Speaker 2>the time, terribly offensive, but we have to get resilient

0:39:09.782 --> 0:39:13.222
<v Speaker 2>and go through that. In the course of professional life,

0:39:13.302 --> 0:39:16.542
<v Speaker 2>people see things differently I'm sure that wouldn't happen. Now

0:39:16.582 --> 0:39:20.262
<v Speaker 2>that's two thousand and seven. Imagine not being even given

0:39:20.262 --> 0:39:22.742
<v Speaker 2>the opportunity to be represented in a case like that,

0:39:22.822 --> 0:39:26.062
<v Speaker 2>which I wasn't wasn't asked question about it, wasn't asked

0:39:26.142 --> 0:39:30.422
<v Speaker 2>any explanation, wasn't given the opportunity, just was done and

0:39:30.502 --> 0:39:31.062
<v Speaker 2>I was off.

0:39:31.542 --> 0:39:33.982
<v Speaker 1>I want to ask about one of the cases you've

0:39:33.982 --> 0:39:37.302
<v Speaker 1>worked on in your second act in defense, Craig Faulbig.

0:39:37.662 --> 0:39:42.462
<v Speaker 1>People will know that name. Kathleen Folbig was sentenced in

0:39:42.502 --> 0:39:45.142
<v Speaker 1>the nineties or early two thousands for the murder and

0:39:45.222 --> 0:39:49.262
<v Speaker 1>man sort of her four children, and you came to

0:39:49.302 --> 0:39:51.782
<v Speaker 1>represent him in twenty eighteen. How did that come up?

0:39:51.782 --> 0:39:56.622
<v Speaker 2>I did. I was briefed by Craig Folbick's solicitor to

0:39:57.222 --> 0:40:01.862
<v Speaker 2>appear in an inquiry before Reg Blanche QC, who was

0:40:01.902 --> 0:40:06.342
<v Speaker 2>the first DPP, and he appointed me a Crown prosecutor

0:40:06.382 --> 0:40:09.982
<v Speaker 2>back in nineteen ninety and I'd worked for him as

0:40:10.022 --> 0:40:14.902
<v Speaker 2>a elicitor in the DPP and since its inception, and

0:40:14.942 --> 0:40:18.662
<v Speaker 2>so he was given the task of an inquiry into

0:40:18.702 --> 0:40:23.542
<v Speaker 2>the convictions of missus Folbig to see whether he agreed

0:40:23.582 --> 0:40:26.222
<v Speaker 2>with them, and so for the first time she was

0:40:26.342 --> 0:40:29.422
<v Speaker 2>cross examined. She hadn't been cross examined in her trials,

0:40:29.702 --> 0:40:34.982
<v Speaker 2>as was her right, And I was instructed by Craig,

0:40:35.262 --> 0:40:38.542
<v Speaker 2>and through his lawyer, I came to know Craig very well.

0:40:38.582 --> 0:40:41.422
<v Speaker 2>He's a very fine man, and on any view of it,

0:40:42.382 --> 0:40:46.782
<v Speaker 2>a victim, a victim of the loss of four children.

0:40:48.022 --> 0:40:52.022
<v Speaker 2>He died recently, did he. He died within the last year,

0:40:52.422 --> 0:40:55.862
<v Speaker 2>and he was quite young, still only in his fifties,

0:40:56.902 --> 0:40:59.462
<v Speaker 2>and he went on to have another child, a son,

0:40:59.542 --> 0:41:08.462
<v Speaker 2>with a new partner. But he died after the last decision.

0:41:08.982 --> 0:41:11.462
<v Speaker 1>So he saw Kathleen freed. Yes, it is something he

0:41:11.502 --> 0:41:12.582
<v Speaker 1>doesn't think should have happened.

0:41:12.622 --> 0:41:16.182
<v Speaker 2>That's very true. That's very true. And I have a

0:41:16.182 --> 0:41:20.942
<v Speaker 2>lot of insight from his suffering, and he told me

0:41:21.702 --> 0:41:24.702
<v Speaker 2>often how he kept trusting her and kept trusting her.

0:41:24.782 --> 0:41:29.262
<v Speaker 2>But anyway, we know what's happened since. However, I cross

0:41:29.302 --> 0:41:33.462
<v Speaker 2>examined her, and I cross examined her on her diaries.

0:41:34.702 --> 0:41:37.782
<v Speaker 2>There's a lot of damaging materials there. And at the

0:41:37.862 --> 0:41:42.902
<v Speaker 2>end of that inquiry, Justice Blanche decided that he was

0:41:42.942 --> 0:41:47.422
<v Speaker 2>more fortified in her guilt than had been the case

0:41:47.542 --> 0:41:49.782
<v Speaker 2>even up to the High Court. Really and that was

0:41:49.822 --> 0:41:53.182
<v Speaker 2>on the basis of a number of well on the

0:41:53.182 --> 0:41:57.782
<v Speaker 2>basis of her cross examination, and we knew about the

0:41:57.942 --> 0:42:02.622
<v Speaker 2>possible genetic difficulty suffered by two out of four of

0:42:02.622 --> 0:42:06.902
<v Speaker 2>the children. One of the children, he was found to

0:42:06.942 --> 0:42:11.142
<v Speaker 2>be not breathing Patrick early in his life life, but

0:42:11.262 --> 0:42:15.222
<v Speaker 2>he was saved for a while. He ended up blind

0:42:15.502 --> 0:42:20.502
<v Speaker 2>and epileptic until he died a few months later with

0:42:21.862 --> 0:42:25.422
<v Speaker 2>having stopped breathing. But anyway, there was a very big

0:42:25.542 --> 0:42:29.382
<v Speaker 2>scientific campaign, and well it.

0:42:29.342 --> 0:42:32.262
<v Speaker 1>Was interesting for you because you had not a small part,

0:42:32.302 --> 0:42:34.022
<v Speaker 1>but you kind of played a part in the middle there,

0:42:34.062 --> 0:42:35.742
<v Speaker 1>but not in the start and then at the end,

0:42:35.862 --> 0:42:37.822
<v Speaker 1>so you kind of got to see it all unravel.

0:42:38.302 --> 0:42:43.222
<v Speaker 2>Yes, yes, that's right. It was very interesting cross examination.

0:42:43.502 --> 0:42:46.422
<v Speaker 2>I think I cross examined this is fold big for

0:42:46.622 --> 0:42:48.222
<v Speaker 2>a day and a half and.

0:42:48.222 --> 0:42:50.582
<v Speaker 1>The first person to do so. Yes, I want to

0:42:50.582 --> 0:42:57.022
<v Speaker 1>bring up Ikak because half free up is very.

0:42:58.382 --> 0:42:59.462
<v Speaker 2>It makes me laugh.

0:43:00.222 --> 0:43:03.062
<v Speaker 1>Well, it was made into such a big deal. They

0:43:03.182 --> 0:43:05.542
<v Speaker 1>dug into your life. They splashed it all over the news.

0:43:05.782 --> 0:43:09.742
<v Speaker 1>It was, you know, your private life, which you've made

0:43:09.782 --> 0:43:13.422
<v Speaker 1>a very big deal to make leave private, was kind

0:43:13.462 --> 0:43:16.342
<v Speaker 1>of put out in the media all for them. To

0:43:16.542 --> 0:43:17.982
<v Speaker 1>work out that you've done nothing wrong.

0:43:18.182 --> 0:43:21.302
<v Speaker 2>That's right. In fact, it was totally misconceived from the

0:43:21.342 --> 0:43:27.382
<v Speaker 2>start because someone told them that somehow someone found out

0:43:27.622 --> 0:43:31.182
<v Speaker 2>that my son's then girlfriend had a crash and found

0:43:31.182 --> 0:43:34.742
<v Speaker 2>out that as it happened, she wasn't tested at the scene.

0:43:34.862 --> 0:43:37.342
<v Speaker 2>But that's because the crash was so bad the car

0:43:37.382 --> 0:43:39.302
<v Speaker 2>was written off. The ambulance came and took her to

0:43:39.342 --> 0:43:41.982
<v Speaker 2>the hospital where her blood was taken. Straight away. She

0:43:42.022 --> 0:43:45.902
<v Speaker 2>went by ambulance with lights and sirens and her blood

0:43:46.062 --> 0:43:49.462
<v Speaker 2>was taken. No alcohol, no drugs, and we knew that

0:43:49.542 --> 0:43:51.022
<v Speaker 2>on the night and.

0:43:51.182 --> 0:43:53.902
<v Speaker 1>For it to become part of an Eykak inquiry.

0:43:53.542 --> 0:43:56.342
<v Speaker 2>Yes, and that's right. And as I kept saying to them,

0:43:57.022 --> 0:43:59.062
<v Speaker 2>she was tested, she was tested, and they do you

0:43:59.102 --> 0:44:02.142
<v Speaker 2>know that? They is it? Well? I think they thought

0:44:02.222 --> 0:44:04.262
<v Speaker 2>that the police had helped me or something, but I

0:44:04.422 --> 0:44:08.182
<v Speaker 2>wasn't there and neither was my son. And her phone,

0:44:08.502 --> 0:44:12.222
<v Speaker 2>the driver's phone, was left in the car with her

0:44:12.262 --> 0:44:16.062
<v Speaker 2>handbag because the car writen was t bone. She was

0:44:16.102 --> 0:44:19.382
<v Speaker 2>pinned by the seat belts up on the side of

0:44:19.422 --> 0:44:23.462
<v Speaker 2>the car. She really did have chest pain when the

0:44:23.502 --> 0:44:28.142
<v Speaker 2>ambulance came. And that's that. But the timing has always

0:44:28.542 --> 0:44:33.262
<v Speaker 2>seemed very odd to me because I just completed a

0:44:33.342 --> 0:44:37.302
<v Speaker 2>stint of about eighteen months as a commissioner inquiring into

0:44:38.022 --> 0:44:44.662
<v Speaker 2>the investigations of pedophile priests in Newcastle historically, and I

0:44:44.942 --> 0:44:48.262
<v Speaker 2>just the day before this crash, I had given my

0:44:48.422 --> 0:44:51.902
<v Speaker 2>report to the Governor and so I was going back

0:44:51.902 --> 0:44:55.222
<v Speaker 2>to my job. But there were all these rumors swirling

0:44:55.262 --> 0:44:58.982
<v Speaker 2>about me being appointed as Supreme Court judge. Now Gemma,

0:44:59.702 --> 0:45:04.302
<v Speaker 2>I swear had I been offered, I would have said no,

0:45:05.702 --> 0:45:07.622
<v Speaker 2>and just by means of a little bit of proof

0:45:07.662 --> 0:45:10.302
<v Speaker 2>of that. In two thousand and seven, the then Attorney

0:45:10.822 --> 0:45:14.062
<v Speaker 2>John Hat's sister Goss who's now head of VIKAC, which

0:45:14.262 --> 0:45:16.382
<v Speaker 2>I think he's the best head they've ever had, frankly,

0:45:16.502 --> 0:45:19.582
<v Speaker 2>and things probably being done properly now there at last.

0:45:19.702 --> 0:45:22.502
<v Speaker 2>But in two thousand and seven I was rung up

0:45:22.542 --> 0:45:25.902
<v Speaker 2>by the Attorney General and he said, oh, well it's

0:45:25.982 --> 0:45:29.342
<v Speaker 2>your turn, District Court judge. You're going to take the appointment.

0:45:29.422 --> 0:45:32.622
<v Speaker 2>I said, no, what No one ever knocks us back.

0:45:32.622 --> 0:45:34.582
<v Speaker 2>And I said, oh I am And he said why

0:45:34.582 --> 0:45:37.222
<v Speaker 2>And I said, look, I don't think I'm really judged

0:45:37.262 --> 0:45:41.262
<v Speaker 2>material because whenever I'm doing a moot or something, and

0:45:41.742 --> 0:45:43.982
<v Speaker 2>one person speaks I think, yeah, that's really good, and

0:45:43.982 --> 0:45:46.382
<v Speaker 2>then the next person speaks on that's really good too.

0:45:46.422 --> 0:45:47.782
<v Speaker 1>And I can't do much empathy.

0:45:47.902 --> 0:45:50.982
<v Speaker 2>I can't even choose, and I want to give both

0:45:50.982 --> 0:45:54.062
<v Speaker 2>the prize. And I said, I really don't think that

0:45:54.462 --> 0:45:57.542
<v Speaker 2>I'm very good at judging. Just leave me on a side,

0:45:58.062 --> 0:46:01.382
<v Speaker 2>give me a side to work at four And that's

0:46:01.382 --> 0:46:02.102
<v Speaker 2>where I'm happy.

0:46:02.342 --> 0:46:05.302
<v Speaker 1>When you think about it, it's a very hard job, like, yes,

0:46:05.782 --> 0:46:08.982
<v Speaker 1>it's to me. It's that typical, like everyone expects you

0:46:08.982 --> 0:46:11.382
<v Speaker 1>to keep climbing the ladder and you're like, no, I'm happy.

0:46:12.262 --> 0:46:16.382
<v Speaker 2>Yeah laterally, that's right. I had a great career and

0:46:16.462 --> 0:46:19.222
<v Speaker 2>I loved it, and I wasn't too sure that i'd

0:46:19.422 --> 0:46:23.222
<v Speaker 2>like it. And you know, I already had my own

0:46:23.302 --> 0:46:26.982
<v Speaker 2>superannuation as a crawn prosecutor. A lot of people go

0:46:27.222 --> 0:46:29.462
<v Speaker 2>to be judges because if you do ten years, you

0:46:29.502 --> 0:46:32.782
<v Speaker 2>get superannuation, and that's why a lot of barristers will

0:46:32.862 --> 0:46:34.582
<v Speaker 2>leave the bar and go and do it. I think

0:46:35.342 --> 0:46:38.222
<v Speaker 2>I think that no one's told me that, but that

0:46:38.302 --> 0:46:40.582
<v Speaker 2>must be the attraction. But it didn't have that attraction

0:46:40.662 --> 0:46:44.182
<v Speaker 2>for me either, And everyone that I've known who's become

0:46:44.222 --> 0:46:47.502
<v Speaker 2>a judge. It's like losing your best friend to the

0:46:47.902 --> 0:46:51.142
<v Speaker 2>priesthood or the nunnery, because you basically never see them again,

0:46:51.222 --> 0:46:52.902
<v Speaker 2>certainly not in the same way. If you see them

0:46:52.902 --> 0:46:55.302
<v Speaker 2>at any function or something and you call them judge,

0:46:55.342 --> 0:46:58.662
<v Speaker 2>they don't correct you, and there's no more lunches or

0:46:58.742 --> 0:47:02.982
<v Speaker 2>drinks after work at the pub. They think that everyone's

0:47:02.982 --> 0:47:05.262
<v Speaker 2>going to be looking at them, and to one or

0:47:05.262 --> 0:47:06.942
<v Speaker 2>two I've said, don't worry, they won't be looking at you.

0:47:06.942 --> 0:47:11.342
<v Speaker 2>They'll be looking at me. I won't even notice you.

0:47:11.422 --> 0:47:14.862
<v Speaker 2>But no, they won't go. They sort of their lives

0:47:14.902 --> 0:47:18.622
<v Speaker 2>become a little more insular, which is pretty ironic because

0:47:19.222 --> 0:47:22.182
<v Speaker 2>what you need to do criminal law is to know

0:47:22.222 --> 0:47:24.742
<v Speaker 2>what's going on. And I got the bus here and

0:47:24.862 --> 0:47:27.982
<v Speaker 2>walk the rest of the way. I love getting public transport.

0:47:28.182 --> 0:47:33.222
<v Speaker 2>I love hanging around in ordinary department stores, grocery stores, pubs,

0:47:33.542 --> 0:47:37.142
<v Speaker 2>footy I love finding out what's really going on and

0:47:37.182 --> 0:47:39.222
<v Speaker 2>what's the use of just going around in a shaff

0:47:39.382 --> 0:47:41.342
<v Speaker 2>driven car not talking to anyone.

0:47:41.862 --> 0:47:45.102
<v Speaker 1>That's so interesting and interesting that you had that foresight,

0:47:45.182 --> 0:47:47.382
<v Speaker 1>And for them to be like, but why not, you're

0:47:47.502 --> 0:47:51.262
<v Speaker 1>turning is down? Yes, but this all happened as Ikak

0:47:51.422 --> 0:47:52.182
<v Speaker 1>was sniffing around.

0:47:52.222 --> 0:47:53.662
<v Speaker 2>Well, yes see how I changed the subject.

0:47:53.742 --> 0:47:56.382
<v Speaker 1>Then I did let us get back to it. But

0:47:56.462 --> 0:47:59.102
<v Speaker 1>you kind of a bit of a rat there, Well.

0:47:58.982 --> 0:48:00.662
<v Speaker 2>Oh, yes, that's right. I think that there may have

0:48:00.702 --> 0:48:04.342
<v Speaker 2>been forces at work here didn't want to see me. Well,

0:48:04.382 --> 0:48:07.582
<v Speaker 2>we had that in common. No one wanted me to

0:48:07.582 --> 0:48:10.622
<v Speaker 2>be a judge, mostly me. I think some people may

0:48:10.622 --> 0:48:12.622
<v Speaker 2>have wanted me to, but some people didn't want me

0:48:12.702 --> 0:48:15.542
<v Speaker 2>to be. And this and this was all just a

0:48:15.582 --> 0:48:19.182
<v Speaker 2>big distraction which had the inevitory when when it was

0:48:19.182 --> 0:48:23.302
<v Speaker 2>looked at by wealthy the Ikak inspector, who the person

0:48:23.342 --> 0:48:26.102
<v Speaker 2>who looks over k got hold of it straight away.

0:48:26.222 --> 0:48:28.942
<v Speaker 2>I didn't even have to ask him to. And he

0:48:29.022 --> 0:48:34.462
<v Speaker 2>initiated an investigation and found that they'd acted illegally, unjustly,

0:48:34.702 --> 0:48:39.102
<v Speaker 2>unfairly and with great prejudice against my family and me.

0:48:39.662 --> 0:48:43.262
<v Speaker 2>And so there's a very damning report and that. But

0:48:43.342 --> 0:48:49.142
<v Speaker 2>then even when a person there persisted on such personal basis,

0:48:49.182 --> 0:48:52.382
<v Speaker 2>someone I'd known for ages anyway and worked with for ages,

0:48:52.422 --> 0:48:55.742
<v Speaker 2>but persisted and tried to get my boss to punish

0:48:55.822 --> 0:48:59.062
<v Speaker 2>me for something to do with a phone by taking

0:48:59.062 --> 0:49:03.182
<v Speaker 2>all these phone messages and engineering a bias against me.

0:49:04.862 --> 0:49:07.782
<v Speaker 2>So it sort of kept going on, but luckily it

0:49:07.862 --> 0:49:12.622
<v Speaker 2>was sent to an independent, kidding body in Victoria and

0:49:12.662 --> 0:49:16.382
<v Speaker 2>the result came back there is nothing, no illegality by

0:49:16.782 --> 0:49:19.502
<v Speaker 2>miss Kneen or any member of her family. And you

0:49:19.542 --> 0:49:25.062
<v Speaker 2>know that some some newspapers never print that, but some do.

0:49:25.062 --> 0:49:26.862
<v Speaker 1>Does it make you angry when you think back on.

0:49:26.822 --> 0:49:31.902
<v Speaker 2>It a little bit, But look, everyone's everyone's life has

0:49:31.942 --> 0:49:35.382
<v Speaker 2>hardships in it. And even when that was happening and

0:49:35.422 --> 0:49:38.942
<v Speaker 2>I was suspended from work and I was you know,

0:49:39.302 --> 0:49:41.502
<v Speaker 2>I was well, I was mainly worried because they were

0:49:42.022 --> 0:49:44.742
<v Speaker 2>dragging my family through it. And that's a tactic by

0:49:45.262 --> 0:49:49.022
<v Speaker 2>bodies like iye CAC because if there was actually any evidence,

0:49:49.222 --> 0:49:51.782
<v Speaker 2>it goes straight to the police, wouldn't it if of

0:49:52.062 --> 0:49:55.702
<v Speaker 2>criminality and the police had said, well there's nothing to

0:49:55.702 --> 0:49:59.022
<v Speaker 2>see here, there's so but that put that's made I

0:49:59.142 --> 0:50:01.462
<v Speaker 2>CAC go after the police there and quiz them. But

0:50:02.902 --> 0:50:06.142
<v Speaker 2>so I cacks only exist when there's no evidence. And

0:50:06.182 --> 0:50:08.782
<v Speaker 2>so the way one of their tactics is to put

0:50:08.822 --> 0:50:11.822
<v Speaker 2>pressure on all their family only members by coming into

0:50:11.822 --> 0:50:16.422
<v Speaker 2>the homes and going through everyone's stuff and surveilling family

0:50:16.422 --> 0:50:21.462
<v Speaker 2>members to try to make the target go. Make it stop, Okay,

0:50:21.542 --> 0:50:24.942
<v Speaker 2>I admit everything, just stop against my family. But luckily

0:50:25.262 --> 0:50:30.102
<v Speaker 2>my family is a praetorian guard and we're a martial

0:50:30.182 --> 0:50:33.782
<v Speaker 2>arts family and a boxing family, and they all just

0:50:33.782 --> 0:50:36.702
<v Speaker 2>just keep fighting, you know, don't worry, We're all in it'

0:50:37.102 --> 0:50:37.542
<v Speaker 2>all fight.

0:50:37.902 --> 0:50:41.622
<v Speaker 1>Well, they picked the wrong family, but you know.

0:50:41.822 --> 0:50:44.382
<v Speaker 2>And luckily they're not a family who looked at me

0:50:44.422 --> 0:50:47.662
<v Speaker 2>and said, oh, you know, what have you done? Oh

0:50:47.702 --> 0:50:50.422
<v Speaker 2>I'm so embarrassed by you. They just got prouder and

0:50:50.462 --> 0:50:51.102
<v Speaker 2>prouder of me.

0:50:51.702 --> 0:50:54.302
<v Speaker 1>But to me, it seems that you kept getting this

0:50:54.422 --> 0:50:58.302
<v Speaker 1>target on your back when you would speak out about something.

0:50:58.382 --> 0:51:01.182
<v Speaker 1>You would kind of question processes, or you would be like, hey,

0:51:02.022 --> 0:51:03.222
<v Speaker 1>why don't we do this differently?

0:51:03.382 --> 0:51:06.142
<v Speaker 2>Or well, that's right, Isn't it kind of ironic that

0:51:06.582 --> 0:51:10.102
<v Speaker 2>I was speaking up for victims of rape having such

0:51:10.102 --> 0:51:12.302
<v Speaker 2>a hard time and having to go back to courts

0:51:12.342 --> 0:51:15.662
<v Speaker 2>over and over again and being treated so badly because

0:51:16.022 --> 0:51:20.742
<v Speaker 2>certain people in the system who would now totally agree

0:51:20.782 --> 0:51:23.742
<v Speaker 2>with that hadn't yet come around to it, and that

0:51:23.942 --> 0:51:27.622
<v Speaker 2>might be taking the credit for it when I was

0:51:28.062 --> 0:51:31.422
<v Speaker 2>really pilloried for it. In fact, even down to being

0:51:32.462 --> 0:51:37.102
<v Speaker 2>questioned by people who may be ashamed of it. Now,

0:51:37.942 --> 0:51:43.062
<v Speaker 2>these prosecutions are just racist prosecutions because they're nice white

0:51:43.102 --> 0:51:46.502
<v Speaker 2>girls with blonde hair, and so you're just for Aussies

0:51:46.582 --> 0:51:51.462
<v Speaker 2>and against Lebanese people. This is terrible. I was able

0:51:51.502 --> 0:51:54.302
<v Speaker 2>to say when I was asked that question by people

0:51:54.302 --> 0:51:59.822
<v Speaker 2>who surprised me when they asked it, namely women's groups.

0:52:00.622 --> 0:52:03.502
<v Speaker 2>I said, why do you say that they're blonde haired girl? Oh?

0:52:03.582 --> 0:52:06.982
<v Speaker 2>I saw one on a current affair. Well, actually she's

0:52:07.022 --> 0:52:09.742
<v Speaker 2>an Aboriginal woman who was wearing a blonde wig and

0:52:10.022 --> 0:52:15.502
<v Speaker 2>green contacts to disguise her appearance. And when she was

0:52:15.542 --> 0:52:19.542
<v Speaker 2>first spoken to on the train by Mohammed scaff He,

0:52:20.142 --> 0:52:24.262
<v Speaker 2>noting that it's not entirely clear what her ethnic derivation is,

0:52:24.302 --> 0:52:28.182
<v Speaker 2>he said to her, are you an Aussy? Where do

0:52:28.262 --> 0:52:30.702
<v Speaker 2>you come from? And she said, I'm as Australian as

0:52:30.742 --> 0:52:36.222
<v Speaker 2>they come, So that'll tell them yes. So yeah, yeah,

0:52:36.702 --> 0:52:40.942
<v Speaker 2>that kind of quietened the group down.

0:52:41.182 --> 0:52:42.102
<v Speaker 1>What's next for you?

0:52:44.982 --> 0:52:46.902
<v Speaker 2>Thanks? Some people say when are you going to retire?

0:52:46.902 --> 0:52:50.902
<v Speaker 2>And I say, do you think I should know? What's that? Well?

0:52:51.222 --> 0:52:53.902
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for asking, Jemma, I am going to I've got

0:52:53.942 --> 0:52:57.022
<v Speaker 2>a pretty full book of trials. Right into the next year,

0:52:57.342 --> 0:53:00.662
<v Speaker 2>and as it keeps happening, people are still asking me

0:53:00.702 --> 0:53:02.982
<v Speaker 2>for trials that will probably go into the year after that,

0:53:03.702 --> 0:53:07.982
<v Speaker 2>and so I figure that the clientele will decide when

0:53:07.982 --> 0:53:12.382
<v Speaker 2>I've had enough, because I've seen people be too old

0:53:12.382 --> 0:53:15.182
<v Speaker 2>for this job, although it's a great job for an

0:53:15.182 --> 0:53:20.462
<v Speaker 2>older person, because juries trust your wisdom, and especially if

0:53:20.542 --> 0:53:25.502
<v Speaker 2>you can render the stories in the common parlance, which

0:53:25.542 --> 0:53:29.262
<v Speaker 2>I think I can. From gosh, I spent a lot

0:53:29.302 --> 0:53:34.582
<v Speaker 2>of time in pubs drinking beers with my kids and

0:53:34.622 --> 0:53:38.702
<v Speaker 2>their mates mentees as well, and that's exactly right. As

0:53:38.742 --> 0:53:41.342
<v Speaker 2>long as you keep in touch, it's still a great advantage.

0:53:41.342 --> 0:53:43.942
<v Speaker 2>It's a job where being old is quite an advantage,

0:53:43.982 --> 0:53:47.502
<v Speaker 2>but it starts to run out, and I hope I'll

0:53:47.502 --> 0:53:49.742
<v Speaker 2>have the sense to know that I'm getting a bit

0:53:49.822 --> 0:53:52.102
<v Speaker 2>past it in maybe ten years.

0:53:56.742 --> 0:53:59.182
<v Speaker 1>Thanks to Margaret for helping us to tell this story

0:53:59.262 --> 0:54:03.102
<v Speaker 1>and for sharing so much of her own true crime conversations.

0:54:03.262 --> 0:54:05.902
<v Speaker 1>Is a Muma mea podcast hosted and produced by Me,

0:54:06.022 --> 0:54:09.902
<v Speaker 1>Jimma Bath and Tarlie Blackman, with audio design by Jacob Brown.

0:54:10.582 --> 0:54:12.542
<v Speaker 1>And a huge thank you to all of you, our

0:54:12.622 --> 0:54:14.942
<v Speaker 1>amazing listeners. We're so grateful to have you back for

0:54:14.982 --> 0:54:17.742
<v Speaker 1>another year of the podcast. We'd love to hear your

0:54:17.782 --> 0:54:21.342
<v Speaker 1>thoughts on the show. Your feedback means so much to us.

0:54:21.542 --> 0:54:23.622
<v Speaker 1>One easy way to share your thoughts is by leaving

0:54:23.622 --> 0:54:26.542
<v Speaker 1>a review on Apple Podcasts. Just scroll down to the

0:54:26.582 --> 0:54:29.542
<v Speaker 1>bottom of your podcast page, click write a review, and

0:54:29.622 --> 0:54:32.622
<v Speaker 1>add a star rating. You can also contact us direct

0:54:32.862 --> 0:54:36.622
<v Speaker 1>at Truecrime at mamamea dot com dot au. Thanks so

0:54:36.702 --> 0:54:39.222
<v Speaker 1>much for listening. I'll be back next week with another

0:54:39.262 --> 0:54:40.422
<v Speaker 1>true Crime Conversation.