WEBVTT - A Cop Cover-Up Or A Killer Girlfriend: Is Karen Read Being Framed?

0:00:11.542 --> 0:00:16.302
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to Amma Mia podcast. Mama Mea acknowledges the

0:00:16.342 --> 0:00:20.182
<v Speaker 1>traditional owners of land and waters. This podcast was recorded

0:00:20.182 --> 0:00:29.902
<v Speaker 1>on It's a blustery winter's night in Canton, Massachusetts in

0:00:30.022 --> 0:00:33.462
<v Speaker 1>January twenty twenty two and Karen Reid and John O'Keeffe

0:00:33.462 --> 0:00:37.542
<v Speaker 1>are out with friends. They're drinking, bar hopping and enjoying

0:00:37.542 --> 0:00:40.222
<v Speaker 1>a night on the town. John is a local cop

0:00:40.542 --> 0:00:42.142
<v Speaker 1>and the plan is to move the party to one

0:00:42.182 --> 0:00:46.462
<v Speaker 1>of his colleagues homes nearby. After midnight, Karen drops John

0:00:46.502 --> 0:00:49.302
<v Speaker 1>at the address and heads back to his house. She

0:00:49.382 --> 0:00:52.382
<v Speaker 1>starts panicking when he still isn't home in the early

0:00:52.422 --> 0:00:56.582
<v Speaker 1>hours of the morning. Well that's her side of the

0:00:56.622 --> 0:01:01.182
<v Speaker 1>story anyway. John's body is found outside the location of

0:01:01.182 --> 0:01:05.022
<v Speaker 1>the house party at six am the next morning. Pieces

0:01:05.022 --> 0:01:08.822
<v Speaker 1>from a broken tail light are found nearby. As Karen

0:01:08.862 --> 0:01:11.822
<v Speaker 1>whales at the site of her dead boyfriend, she says

0:01:11.862 --> 0:01:15.542
<v Speaker 1>something that remains a point of contention. Either I hit him,

0:01:15.582 --> 0:01:18.742
<v Speaker 1>I hit him? Or did I hit him? Did I

0:01:18.822 --> 0:01:23.582
<v Speaker 1>hit him? The slight change of inference means everything. It

0:01:23.622 --> 0:01:26.782
<v Speaker 1>could mean the difference between freedom and a jail cell

0:01:26.902 --> 0:01:31.862
<v Speaker 1>for Karen. But this story gets even murkier because as

0:01:31.902 --> 0:01:34.982
<v Speaker 1>her defense picks up the case, they start to unravel

0:01:35.022 --> 0:01:39.222
<v Speaker 1>another potential series of events, one that involves a cover up,

0:01:39.742 --> 0:01:44.542
<v Speaker 1>contamination by law enforcement, and the framing of Karen for murder.

0:01:55.902 --> 0:01:59.182
<v Speaker 1>I'm Jemma Bass and this is True Crime Conversations a

0:01:59.302 --> 0:02:02.622
<v Speaker 1>Muma me a podcast exploring the world's most notorious crimes

0:02:03.142 --> 0:02:05.662
<v Speaker 1>by speaking to the people who know the most about them.

0:02:06.542 --> 0:02:10.062
<v Speaker 1>Before her arrest, Karen Read was a financial analyst and professor.

0:02:10.662 --> 0:02:13.462
<v Speaker 1>She'd been dating John O'Keeffe, a Boston police officer, for

0:02:13.542 --> 0:02:17.462
<v Speaker 1>two years. Photos of the pair show an attractive, smiling

0:02:17.542 --> 0:02:20.902
<v Speaker 1>couple in their mid forties, but despite the pretty pictures,

0:02:20.942 --> 0:02:25.502
<v Speaker 1>their relationship wasn't all rosy. They'd been having some disagreements

0:02:25.542 --> 0:02:28.302
<v Speaker 1>in the lead up to that January twenty twenty two evening.

0:02:29.262 --> 0:02:32.502
<v Speaker 1>Ever since John's death, the town where he died has

0:02:32.542 --> 0:02:36.902
<v Speaker 1>been divided, but it since snowbled into an international debate

0:02:37.342 --> 0:02:40.382
<v Speaker 1>fueled by the free Karen movement that's grown legs online.

0:02:41.102 --> 0:02:45.022
<v Speaker 1>There's two very distinct camps. Was John killed by those

0:02:45.142 --> 0:02:49.022
<v Speaker 1>inside the house, a house full of police and law enforcement,

0:02:49.422 --> 0:02:52.702
<v Speaker 1>who then proceeded to cover up his murder, or did

0:02:52.702 --> 0:02:56.062
<v Speaker 1>his girlfriend Karen kill him before he even made it

0:02:56.102 --> 0:02:59.702
<v Speaker 1>through the front door. To help us unpack those theories

0:02:59.742 --> 0:03:03.262
<v Speaker 1>and everything that came before it, where joined by Jessica Lalfer,

0:03:03.582 --> 0:03:07.182
<v Speaker 1>producer of Karen, an in depth podcast series by the

0:03:07.262 --> 0:03:19.662
<v Speaker 1>Law and Crime Network. Jessica joins us now just tell

0:03:19.742 --> 0:03:22.542
<v Speaker 1>us about Karen and Jones love story.

0:03:23.462 --> 0:03:26.702
<v Speaker 2>So, Karen and John actually first met when they were

0:03:26.702 --> 0:03:31.182
<v Speaker 2>in their twenties, shortly after college. They dated for a

0:03:31.222 --> 0:03:34.222
<v Speaker 2>little while, but their careers took them on different paths.

0:03:34.742 --> 0:03:40.182
<v Speaker 2>Karen became an adjunct professor at Bentley University in Massachusetts,

0:03:40.782 --> 0:03:44.462
<v Speaker 2>and John O'Keefe became a cop. He was a Boston

0:03:44.502 --> 0:03:48.542
<v Speaker 2>Police officer, and in twenty twenty or you know, during

0:03:48.582 --> 0:03:52.502
<v Speaker 2>the COVID era, they came across each other again on

0:03:52.542 --> 0:03:55.782
<v Speaker 2>Facebook and he messaged her and was like, you know,

0:03:55.942 --> 0:04:00.262
<v Speaker 2>longtime no see, And she was looking at his profile

0:04:00.342 --> 0:04:03.062
<v Speaker 2>and was like, oh, I noticed you have these kids

0:04:03.102 --> 0:04:05.302
<v Speaker 2>with you now, like, what's going on with that? And

0:04:05.462 --> 0:04:08.862
<v Speaker 2>it turns out that he has taken custody of his

0:04:08.982 --> 0:04:13.222
<v Speaker 2>niece and his nephew after the really really sad story

0:04:13.302 --> 0:04:16.542
<v Speaker 2>that not only did his brother in law die, but

0:04:16.702 --> 0:04:20.382
<v Speaker 2>also his sister died, and so that left the kids

0:04:20.422 --> 0:04:23.422
<v Speaker 2>without any parents, and so John swooped in and took

0:04:23.462 --> 0:04:26.782
<v Speaker 2>them under his wing. And so he ended up taking

0:04:26.822 --> 0:04:30.222
<v Speaker 2>a desk job at the Boston Police Department to have

0:04:30.262 --> 0:04:33.942
<v Speaker 2>a safer job so he could take care of these kids.

0:04:34.102 --> 0:04:37.142
<v Speaker 2>And from what I had seen on their TikTok, they

0:04:37.262 --> 0:04:38.982
<v Speaker 2>just had like a ton of fun together. You can

0:04:39.022 --> 0:04:42.702
<v Speaker 2>tell he was the fun uncle and really loved them,

0:04:42.982 --> 0:04:45.302
<v Speaker 2>and it really just seemed like a really fun house

0:04:45.302 --> 0:04:48.742
<v Speaker 2>to live in. But Karen and John they rekindled and

0:04:49.622 --> 0:04:52.702
<v Speaker 2>they dated for two years up until the night that

0:04:52.822 --> 0:04:55.222
<v Speaker 2>this tragic incident happened.

0:04:56.062 --> 0:04:59.582
<v Speaker 1>That's a lot of different dynamics to navigate as someone

0:04:59.662 --> 0:05:04.142
<v Speaker 1>coming into a new relationship. You've got this once single guy,

0:05:04.542 --> 0:05:07.422
<v Speaker 1>no kids, who suddenly has two children to look after.

0:05:07.462 --> 0:05:10.902
<v Speaker 1>He's also grieving. How did they navigate all of that

0:05:11.222 --> 0:05:14.462
<v Speaker 1>her basically adopting two step kids in this relationship.

0:05:15.262 --> 0:05:18.902
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, from all accounts we've heard, Karen really really cared

0:05:18.982 --> 0:05:23.422
<v Speaker 2>about the children, and she was often spending the night

0:05:23.542 --> 0:05:26.302
<v Speaker 2>at John's house and helping to raise them, to take

0:05:26.342 --> 0:05:28.302
<v Speaker 2>care of them. She was very invested in their futures.

0:05:28.342 --> 0:05:31.302
<v Speaker 2>But Karen and John were only dating, and so there

0:05:31.302 --> 0:05:33.822
<v Speaker 2>were times where she felt like she was being taken

0:05:33.902 --> 0:05:37.862
<v Speaker 2>advantage of when he would go out drinking and she

0:05:37.902 --> 0:05:39.662
<v Speaker 2>couldn't get a hold of him and she would be

0:05:39.702 --> 0:05:41.342
<v Speaker 2>at the house with the kids. You know, She's like,

0:05:41.342 --> 0:05:42.942
<v Speaker 2>I have to go back to my house. I have

0:05:42.982 --> 0:05:45.742
<v Speaker 2>a job to do, and you're nowhere to be found.

0:05:45.942 --> 0:05:49.222
<v Speaker 2>And so there was a lot of back and forth,

0:05:49.342 --> 0:05:51.862
<v Speaker 2>it seems, between the two of them over the kids,

0:05:51.862 --> 0:05:55.022
<v Speaker 2>and especially from some testimony we heard during the trial

0:05:55.462 --> 0:05:58.782
<v Speaker 2>about what she was feeding the kids, it's actually kind

0:05:58.822 --> 0:06:02.422
<v Speaker 2>of ironic that it's all over like Dunkin Donuts, which

0:06:02.502 --> 0:06:05.702
<v Speaker 2>is very Massachusetts, very Boston of this case.

0:06:06.902 --> 0:06:09.782
<v Speaker 1>So take me through that he was upset that she

0:06:09.862 --> 0:06:10.942
<v Speaker 1>was fading them donuts.

0:06:11.942 --> 0:06:15.222
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so there was just one morning where instead of

0:06:15.422 --> 0:06:17.782
<v Speaker 2>making them a breakfast, she brought them Dunkin Donuts and

0:06:17.862 --> 0:06:21.022
<v Speaker 2>John was unhappy about the kids eating donuts and wanting

0:06:21.022 --> 0:06:23.142
<v Speaker 2>them to eat something healthier, and they had a big

0:06:23.222 --> 0:06:26.302
<v Speaker 2>argument about it. But I'll say this, just judging from

0:06:26.422 --> 0:06:30.782
<v Speaker 2>everything we've learned about Karen and John over the course

0:06:31.142 --> 0:06:33.502
<v Speaker 2>of the past couple of years since instance and it happened,

0:06:34.262 --> 0:06:36.462
<v Speaker 2>it seems like it's pretty easy to get them to

0:06:36.462 --> 0:06:38.502
<v Speaker 2>fly off the handle. You know, she seems like she

0:06:38.542 --> 0:06:41.302
<v Speaker 2>has quite a temper on her And I'm not sure

0:06:41.302 --> 0:06:44.502
<v Speaker 2>about John. I haven't heard that about him. But it

0:06:44.542 --> 0:06:47.822
<v Speaker 2>takes two to start a foot, yeah.

0:06:48.102 --> 0:06:51.262
<v Speaker 1>Quick to fire, by the sounds. So what was the

0:06:51.302 --> 0:06:54.702
<v Speaker 1>state of their relationship looking like in twenty twenty two.

0:06:54.822 --> 0:06:55.982
<v Speaker 1>Early twenty twenty.

0:06:55.702 --> 0:07:00.062
<v Speaker 2>Two, people in the group were saying that the relationship

0:07:00.102 --> 0:07:04.142
<v Speaker 2>had run its course. The niece actually had overheard John

0:07:04.862 --> 0:07:07.942
<v Speaker 2>say to Karen that this isn't healthy. And this was

0:07:07.982 --> 0:07:11.702
<v Speaker 2>one week before his death, and so there's a lot

0:07:11.742 --> 0:07:15.622
<v Speaker 2>of like moving parts around this time. They're dating, she's

0:07:15.702 --> 0:07:18.542
<v Speaker 2>practically living with him, she's taking care of his children.

0:07:19.102 --> 0:07:21.022
<v Speaker 2>But you know, they still love each other and so

0:07:21.142 --> 0:07:23.382
<v Speaker 2>it seems like it's very hard for them to figure

0:07:23.382 --> 0:07:26.982
<v Speaker 2>out like how to make this work. And then leading

0:07:27.062 --> 0:07:29.062
<v Speaker 2>up to the night of the twenty eighth, you can

0:07:29.102 --> 0:07:32.782
<v Speaker 2>see on surveillance footage John and Karen and their group

0:07:32.822 --> 0:07:35.982
<v Speaker 2>of friends. They're at this bar called the Waterfall Bard Girl,

0:07:36.942 --> 0:07:39.502
<v Speaker 2>and they look like they're having a great time. Everybody

0:07:39.542 --> 0:07:42.702
<v Speaker 2>looks like they're getting along. Everybody's laughing, She's like holding

0:07:42.742 --> 0:07:46.662
<v Speaker 2>on to him. They're very affectionate, and it's very hard

0:07:46.662 --> 0:07:48.622
<v Speaker 2>to believe everything that happens after this.

0:07:49.662 --> 0:07:51.862
<v Speaker 1>They go to an after potty, which is what happens

0:07:51.862 --> 0:07:54.942
<v Speaker 1>after the night out drinking. Before we get to what happened,

0:07:55.022 --> 0:07:58.182
<v Speaker 1>can you give us some context about who was at

0:07:58.182 --> 0:08:00.622
<v Speaker 1>that after potty, because it was a house that was

0:08:00.622 --> 0:08:03.542
<v Speaker 1>owned by a man called Brian Albert, and he's quite

0:08:03.582 --> 0:08:04.702
<v Speaker 1>significant in this story.

0:08:05.302 --> 0:08:08.862
<v Speaker 2>He is, so Brian Albert is also a Boston police officer,

0:08:08.982 --> 0:08:12.502
<v Speaker 2>so he knew John O'Keeffe. He said he was a

0:08:12.502 --> 0:08:15.342
<v Speaker 2>friend of his, but they were probably just buddies. They're

0:08:15.342 --> 0:08:18.702
<v Speaker 2>also cops. They live near each other, and also John

0:08:18.742 --> 0:08:22.262
<v Speaker 2>O'Keeffe lives next door to Colin Albert, which is the

0:08:22.382 --> 0:08:26.342
<v Speaker 2>nephew of Brian Albert. So thirty four Fairview Road is

0:08:26.342 --> 0:08:30.022
<v Speaker 2>where all of this ends up taking place. In Campton, Massachusetts,

0:08:30.582 --> 0:08:34.102
<v Speaker 2>a noeters coming in, which is a huge snowstorm, the

0:08:34.262 --> 0:08:36.502
<v Speaker 2>likes of which the area had not seen in years,

0:08:36.702 --> 0:08:40.102
<v Speaker 2>and they were projected to get like feet and feet

0:08:40.142 --> 0:08:42.822
<v Speaker 2>of snow, and so they were all just trying to

0:08:42.862 --> 0:08:45.382
<v Speaker 2>get one last hurrahan before they were going to be

0:08:45.542 --> 0:08:50.622
<v Speaker 2>holed in by this snow. And at the house, they're

0:08:50.662 --> 0:08:55.742
<v Speaker 2>celebrating Brian Junior's birthday, party, So Brian Junior is there

0:08:56.022 --> 0:08:59.102
<v Speaker 2>at the house with a bunch of his friends, while

0:08:59.182 --> 0:09:02.102
<v Speaker 2>the parents in John O'Keeffe and Karen Reider at the bar.

0:09:02.542 --> 0:09:06.502
<v Speaker 2>And so around twelve fifteen, everyone starts trickling from the

0:09:06.542 --> 0:09:09.302
<v Speaker 2>bar to the Albert home and this is the home

0:09:09.382 --> 0:09:14.062
<v Speaker 2>of Brian. And at the home with them at this

0:09:14.262 --> 0:09:18.862
<v Speaker 2>point is Jennifer McCabe. So one other person that's at

0:09:18.862 --> 0:09:21.142
<v Speaker 2>this party is the person that Karen Reid has been

0:09:22.062 --> 0:09:25.302
<v Speaker 2>exchanging flirtatious text with and he was also at the bar.

0:09:25.462 --> 0:09:29.022
<v Speaker 2>His name is Brian Higgins. There are two Brian's in

0:09:29.062 --> 0:09:34.422
<v Speaker 2>this story. So Brian Higgins is not a police officer,

0:09:34.502 --> 0:09:37.142
<v Speaker 2>but he's in law enforcement and he happens to have

0:09:37.182 --> 0:09:41.302
<v Speaker 2>an office in the Canton Police Department, where Kevin Albert

0:09:41.422 --> 0:09:45.462
<v Speaker 2>is a detective. Kevin is Brian's brother, and they have

0:09:45.502 --> 0:09:51.422
<v Speaker 2>another brother named Chris, who is the Canton Selectman. So

0:09:51.662 --> 0:09:54.542
<v Speaker 2>this is clearly a very well connected family in this

0:09:54.582 --> 0:10:00.302
<v Speaker 2>little town. So it's easy to see where this conspiracy

0:10:00.342 --> 0:10:05.542
<v Speaker 2>theory took fire because there are so many tentacles to

0:10:05.622 --> 0:10:09.182
<v Speaker 2>this family and so many people involved. But at the

0:10:09.182 --> 0:10:13.862
<v Speaker 2>core of it, that night, there were about ten adults

0:10:14.382 --> 0:10:16.942
<v Speaker 2>and maybe a few of the kids left from the

0:10:16.982 --> 0:10:20.102
<v Speaker 2>birthday celebration around twelve thirty at night.

0:10:21.062 --> 0:10:24.502
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so what does Karen say happened that evening?

0:10:25.542 --> 0:10:29.382
<v Speaker 2>So Karen Reid has really not said much about this

0:10:29.542 --> 0:10:35.222
<v Speaker 2>case publicly, except she did an interview for Nightline back

0:10:35.262 --> 0:10:39.062
<v Speaker 2>in twenty twenty three before the trial took place, and

0:10:39.182 --> 0:10:42.502
<v Speaker 2>I'm actually surprised her lawyers let her do this. But

0:10:42.862 --> 0:10:46.902
<v Speaker 2>she says that she and John were leaving the bar

0:10:47.822 --> 0:10:50.462
<v Speaker 2>and he says, we're going to go to the Alberts

0:10:50.462 --> 0:10:54.182
<v Speaker 2>for the after party. She says, are we invited? I

0:10:54.262 --> 0:10:57.662
<v Speaker 2>want to make sure we're invited, And so she tells

0:10:57.782 --> 0:11:01.022
<v Speaker 2>him when they get there to go inside to make

0:11:01.022 --> 0:11:05.902
<v Speaker 2>sure that it's okay, that they're welcome there. And this

0:11:05.942 --> 0:11:08.062
<v Speaker 2>is where the details get like a little fuzzy, because

0:11:08.102 --> 0:11:10.422
<v Speaker 2>she says she never saw him go in the house,

0:11:10.822 --> 0:11:13.422
<v Speaker 2>but she saw him approach the door. She says she

0:11:13.502 --> 0:11:17.262
<v Speaker 2>looked down at her phone and then drove off, which

0:11:17.302 --> 0:11:19.462
<v Speaker 2>is kind of weird because I thought she was going

0:11:19.542 --> 0:11:22.342
<v Speaker 2>to stay at the party. But there's also some times

0:11:22.342 --> 0:11:24.622
<v Speaker 2>where she said that she waited for a really long

0:11:24.662 --> 0:11:28.102
<v Speaker 2>time for John to come out and give her the

0:11:28.102 --> 0:11:30.782
<v Speaker 2>confirmation and he wasn't answering his phone and he wasn't

0:11:30.822 --> 0:11:34.102
<v Speaker 2>responding to any texts. So perhaps she was there for

0:11:34.142 --> 0:11:38.182
<v Speaker 2>about ten minutes and waited for him, and then she

0:11:38.262 --> 0:11:40.782
<v Speaker 2>took off and went back to his house for the

0:11:40.902 --> 0:11:44.262
<v Speaker 2>night because that's where the kids were and somebody needed

0:11:44.262 --> 0:11:47.582
<v Speaker 2>to be with them overnight. And over the course of

0:11:47.622 --> 0:11:53.182
<v Speaker 2>this whole evening, she's blowing up his phone, she's texting him,

0:11:53.222 --> 0:11:57.662
<v Speaker 2>she calls him fifty times, and she's leaving like these

0:11:57.702 --> 0:12:02.502
<v Speaker 2>profanity laden voicemails. They're kind of funny if it wasn't

0:12:02.542 --> 0:12:06.302
<v Speaker 2>in the middle of this extremely serious situation. So that's

0:12:06.382 --> 0:12:09.622
<v Speaker 2>Karen's story, is that she wakes up around five am

0:12:09.662 --> 0:12:12.302
<v Speaker 2>and she realized John never came into the house. She

0:12:12.422 --> 0:12:15.062
<v Speaker 2>was sleeping on the couch and I believe the niece

0:12:15.182 --> 0:12:18.422
<v Speaker 2>was with her in the living room. So she calls

0:12:18.542 --> 0:12:22.382
<v Speaker 2>Jennifer McCabe, who again is the sister in law of

0:12:22.462 --> 0:12:25.382
<v Speaker 2>Brian Albert, the homeowner, and she says, you know, John

0:12:25.422 --> 0:12:27.542
<v Speaker 2>never came home last night. Where's John? Do you think

0:12:27.542 --> 0:12:30.902
<v Speaker 2>he got hit by a plow? And it's really interesting

0:12:31.182 --> 0:12:35.702
<v Speaker 2>that she's just throwing out all of these weird like

0:12:35.742 --> 0:12:37.662
<v Speaker 2>what if he got hit by a plow, Like, we

0:12:37.742 --> 0:12:41.062
<v Speaker 2>need to go look for him. So she, an Jennifer

0:12:41.142 --> 0:12:44.502
<v Speaker 2>and this woman Carrie Roberts decide to go on this

0:12:44.982 --> 0:12:49.982
<v Speaker 2>journey together to look for John. And while she's on

0:12:50.022 --> 0:12:54.582
<v Speaker 2>the phone with Jennifer McCabe, Jennifer's husband, here's the conversation

0:12:55.142 --> 0:12:57.902
<v Speaker 2>and Karen is saying, I left him at the waterfall.

0:12:58.022 --> 0:13:00.182
<v Speaker 2>I must have left him at the waterfall, and he's like,

0:13:00.262 --> 0:13:03.982
<v Speaker 2>what are you talking about? We saw you outside the house.

0:13:04.302 --> 0:13:06.622
<v Speaker 2>So there are multiple people who say they saw her

0:13:06.702 --> 0:13:10.222
<v Speaker 2>dark suv outside of the house. So we know that

0:13:10.302 --> 0:13:14.062
<v Speaker 2>it's at least true that she pulled up to the

0:13:14.102 --> 0:13:18.142
<v Speaker 2>house and dropped off John. That's true. Nobody's debating that.

0:13:19.062 --> 0:13:22.302
<v Speaker 2>But what happens next is still a mystery because they're

0:13:22.382 --> 0:13:26.542
<v Speaker 2>driving around the two square miles from the bar to

0:13:26.662 --> 0:13:30.222
<v Speaker 2>the two houses, and as soon as they pull up

0:13:30.262 --> 0:13:34.062
<v Speaker 2>in front of the house, the homeowner is Brian Albert,

0:13:34.342 --> 0:13:39.422
<v Speaker 2>Boston police officer. She immediately homes in on this gigantic

0:13:39.582 --> 0:13:42.902
<v Speaker 2>snow mound in between the flagpole and the fire hydrant,

0:13:43.182 --> 0:13:45.382
<v Speaker 2>and she runs and she beelines to it. She's like,

0:13:45.422 --> 0:13:48.662
<v Speaker 2>it's John, It's John, It's John. Nobody else sees what

0:13:48.822 --> 0:13:52.462
<v Speaker 2>she's seeing. Like again, it's snowing very, very hard. There's

0:13:52.462 --> 0:13:54.062
<v Speaker 2>at least two feet of snow on the ground, I

0:13:54.102 --> 0:13:57.222
<v Speaker 2>believe at this point, and she runs over to him.

0:13:57.302 --> 0:13:59.942
<v Speaker 2>She's pushing the snow off of him. At one point

0:14:00.022 --> 0:14:03.702
<v Speaker 2>she takes her shirt off, she takes his shirt off,

0:14:03.742 --> 0:14:09.382
<v Speaker 2>and she's trying to warm him up. And I believe

0:14:09.982 --> 0:14:14.102
<v Speaker 2>he's still alive at this point, or you know, maybe

0:14:14.142 --> 0:14:18.942
<v Speaker 2>he's just pronounced dead later. But it's really strange what

0:14:18.982 --> 0:14:21.942
<v Speaker 2>you end up seeing. Of course, I've never seen his

0:14:22.062 --> 0:14:25.022
<v Speaker 2>body on the scene, but he has two black eyes,

0:14:25.822 --> 0:14:28.902
<v Speaker 2>a big straight abrasion on the back of his head,

0:14:29.502 --> 0:14:31.742
<v Speaker 2>and he has a lot of what looked like claw

0:14:31.822 --> 0:14:36.742
<v Speaker 2>marks scratches on one of his arms, and he's bleeding

0:14:36.782 --> 0:14:39.502
<v Speaker 2>from the mouth and the nose and the eyes, and

0:14:39.582 --> 0:14:42.182
<v Speaker 2>so they call nine one one. Multiple people have called

0:14:42.262 --> 0:14:45.022
<v Speaker 2>nine one one at this point. And this is where

0:14:45.062 --> 0:14:48.822
<v Speaker 2>again it gets even more complicated because a lot of

0:14:48.862 --> 0:14:53.182
<v Speaker 2>people end up on this scene, the paramedics, the investigating

0:14:53.302 --> 0:14:57.422
<v Speaker 2>officers from the Canton Police Department, who do not investigate homicides,

0:14:57.502 --> 0:15:00.422
<v Speaker 2>let alone deaths, and so they're a little bit out

0:15:00.422 --> 0:15:04.062
<v Speaker 2>of their element. It's snowing. It's a crazy scene. It's

0:15:04.062 --> 0:15:09.022
<v Speaker 2>six in the morning, and Karen is screaming hysterically. Everyone

0:15:09.102 --> 0:15:11.862
<v Speaker 2>keeps talking about how crazy she's going at this scene,

0:15:11.902 --> 0:15:15.502
<v Speaker 2>while everyone else is very calm and they're just, you know,

0:15:15.582 --> 0:15:18.182
<v Speaker 2>kind of in shock that this is even happening to

0:15:18.462 --> 0:15:24.462
<v Speaker 2>their good friend John O'Keefe. And there are multiple accounts

0:15:24.982 --> 0:15:28.942
<v Speaker 2>that Karen said I hit him, I hit him, I

0:15:29.022 --> 0:15:33.742
<v Speaker 2>hit him, but nobody wrote it down in a single

0:15:33.742 --> 0:15:35.222
<v Speaker 2>report at the time.

0:15:36.342 --> 0:15:39.902
<v Speaker 1>There was also contention over the wording of that wasn't.

0:15:39.702 --> 0:15:44.342
<v Speaker 2>There right, And so she maintains that she did not

0:15:44.422 --> 0:15:47.822
<v Speaker 2>say I hit him. She maintains she asked did I

0:15:47.942 --> 0:15:52.182
<v Speaker 2>hit him? Could I have hit him? Because she's thinking

0:15:52.262 --> 0:15:55.222
<v Speaker 2>back to the night before when she dropped him off.

0:15:55.862 --> 0:15:57.902
<v Speaker 2>And so this is where it gets a little fuzzy,

0:15:57.942 --> 0:16:01.142
<v Speaker 2>because you you either have to believe that she doesn't

0:16:01.262 --> 0:16:04.742
<v Speaker 2>remember anything about that night, or she's only remembering details,

0:16:04.862 --> 0:16:08.222
<v Speaker 2>or they're coming to her over time, which could happen.

0:16:08.862 --> 0:16:13.182
<v Speaker 2>But really everything about this case is really complicated by

0:16:13.182 --> 0:16:17.182
<v Speaker 2>the fact that nobody secures the scene, none of the

0:16:17.542 --> 0:16:22.502
<v Speaker 2>officers separate the witnesses, They never go into the home.

0:16:22.742 --> 0:16:27.662
<v Speaker 2>Brian albert A police officer and a first responder never

0:16:27.742 --> 0:16:32.342
<v Speaker 2>comes out of his home to see what's going on outside,

0:16:32.582 --> 0:16:39.142
<v Speaker 2>and they start collecting evidence with red solo cups borrowed

0:16:39.182 --> 0:16:42.742
<v Speaker 2>from a cop neighbor who lives down the street.

0:16:43.342 --> 0:16:45.382
<v Speaker 1>That is a wild detile, isn't it.

0:16:45.902 --> 0:16:47.702
<v Speaker 2>I know it came out in the trial. It was

0:16:47.782 --> 0:16:49.662
<v Speaker 2>just like, how far away is the police department? You

0:16:49.702 --> 0:16:52.822
<v Speaker 2>guys don't have sterile plastic containers, like what would take

0:16:52.822 --> 0:16:56.222
<v Speaker 2>you five minutes to get there? So they're clearly out

0:16:56.222 --> 0:16:58.862
<v Speaker 2>of their element by the time the afternoon rolls around.

0:16:58.942 --> 0:17:01.102
<v Speaker 2>Obviously this case has been taken out of their hands

0:17:01.182 --> 0:17:04.502
<v Speaker 2>and it's given to the Massachusetts State Police. And this

0:17:04.782 --> 0:17:09.302
<v Speaker 2>complicates the case even more because the person assigned to

0:17:09.342 --> 0:17:13.182
<v Speaker 2>investigate this is Trooper Michael Proctor, and he is also

0:17:13.302 --> 0:17:15.542
<v Speaker 2>a friend of the homeowner, Brian Albert.

0:17:20.222 --> 0:17:24.142
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to True Crime Conversations with me Jimmy Bath.

0:17:24.662 --> 0:17:33.742
<v Speaker 1>I'm speaking with Jessica Laufa about the trial of Karen Reid.

0:17:34.942 --> 0:17:39.862
<v Speaker 1>What is John's actual cause of death put down in

0:17:40.182 --> 0:17:41.822
<v Speaker 1>his autopsy report?

0:17:42.422 --> 0:17:46.662
<v Speaker 2>This is what's crazy, is that his cause of death

0:17:46.782 --> 0:17:51.862
<v Speaker 2>is blunt force trauma mixed with hypothermia. So if it happened.

0:17:51.862 --> 0:17:56.142
<v Speaker 2>How the prosecution says it happened is that Karen Reid

0:17:56.182 --> 0:17:59.782
<v Speaker 2>backed up into John O'Keefe hit him with her car,

0:18:00.182 --> 0:18:03.702
<v Speaker 2>and he laid there for six hours until someone found him.

0:18:04.222 --> 0:18:09.182
<v Speaker 2>And it was freezing cold, wind whipping, snow piling up.

0:18:09.942 --> 0:18:12.822
<v Speaker 2>But what's so strange about that is that there were

0:18:12.862 --> 0:18:15.782
<v Speaker 2>a lot of people coming and going from this party

0:18:16.662 --> 0:18:21.622
<v Speaker 2>all night. And even the plow driver who came through

0:18:21.662 --> 0:18:24.422
<v Speaker 2>at two thirty in the morning has his light shining

0:18:24.422 --> 0:18:26.822
<v Speaker 2>and says he never sees anything in that front lawn,

0:18:26.902 --> 0:18:29.222
<v Speaker 2>and he would have noticed it because he drives this

0:18:29.342 --> 0:18:35.222
<v Speaker 2>route all the time. And they never determined his manner

0:18:35.262 --> 0:18:39.862
<v Speaker 2>of death, which is curious that you would try to

0:18:39.862 --> 0:18:43.262
<v Speaker 2>put someone on trial for murder without a determined manner

0:18:43.302 --> 0:18:43.742
<v Speaker 2>of death.

0:18:44.462 --> 0:18:48.142
<v Speaker 1>And there were, as you were saying before, quite bizarre

0:18:48.182 --> 0:18:52.102
<v Speaker 1>injuries on him if you consider that the prosecution thinks

0:18:52.142 --> 0:18:55.022
<v Speaker 1>that he was backed into, but he had bruises on

0:18:55.102 --> 0:18:59.182
<v Speaker 1>his eyes and he had weird mocks on his arms.

0:19:00.302 --> 0:19:02.582
<v Speaker 2>And that's the thing is that the prosecution has an

0:19:02.622 --> 0:19:06.062
<v Speaker 2>expert that testifies that these injuries are consistent with being

0:19:06.102 --> 0:19:09.302
<v Speaker 2>hit by a car, But the defense has an expert

0:19:09.342 --> 0:19:11.662
<v Speaker 2>that goes on and says or not this is consistent

0:19:11.702 --> 0:19:14.342
<v Speaker 2>with either a fight or an attack by an animal.

0:19:14.942 --> 0:19:16.702
<v Speaker 1>And there was an animal there wasn't there?

0:19:17.342 --> 0:19:20.182
<v Speaker 2>There was an animal there? And is if this story

0:19:20.262 --> 0:19:22.822
<v Speaker 2>is not crazy enough. Now a dog named Chloe becomes

0:19:22.902 --> 0:19:26.782
<v Speaker 2>a suspect. There's a German shepherd that's been living with

0:19:26.902 --> 0:19:32.262
<v Speaker 2>the Alberts for seven years, their beloved pet dog. And curiously,

0:19:33.302 --> 0:19:37.782
<v Speaker 2>they rehome this dog within months of John o'keeith's death.

0:19:38.302 --> 0:19:42.142
<v Speaker 2>And not only do they rehome the dog, they rehome themselves.

0:19:42.422 --> 0:19:45.422
<v Speaker 2>They buy a new home, even after they had just

0:19:45.502 --> 0:19:50.262
<v Speaker 2>renovated their entire basement. So a lot of curious things

0:19:50.382 --> 0:19:54.502
<v Speaker 2>going on, a lot of strange coincidences, I suppose. But

0:19:55.422 --> 0:19:59.342
<v Speaker 2>on the final day of the trial, before closing arguments,

0:20:00.102 --> 0:20:02.462
<v Speaker 2>they have an expert go up there and say, these

0:20:02.542 --> 0:20:05.942
<v Speaker 2>marks on John O'Keefe's arms are consistent with that of

0:20:06.102 --> 0:20:09.182
<v Speaker 2>dog claw marks and bites, and if you look at

0:20:09.222 --> 0:20:12.542
<v Speaker 2>the photos or look at other photos of dog attacks,

0:20:12.582 --> 0:20:17.742
<v Speaker 2>they look exactly the same. Nobody ever examined the dog.

0:20:17.822 --> 0:20:21.222
<v Speaker 2>The dog was living in Vermont, and they say that

0:20:21.302 --> 0:20:24.662
<v Speaker 2>they offered up the address of the dog if they

0:20:24.702 --> 0:20:28.942
<v Speaker 2>wanted to go interview her, But yeah, no one ever

0:20:29.022 --> 0:20:33.302
<v Speaker 2>really followed up with this lead, and because really the

0:20:33.382 --> 0:20:35.262
<v Speaker 2>crux of the story is is that they honed in

0:20:35.302 --> 0:20:40.982
<v Speaker 2>on Karen Reid from day one and they wanted someone

0:20:41.022 --> 0:20:44.222
<v Speaker 2>to blame this on, and they blamed it on her.

0:20:44.822 --> 0:20:49.142
<v Speaker 1>Well, she was arrested in early feb initially not charged

0:20:49.182 --> 0:20:53.182
<v Speaker 1>with murder, but quite quickly upgraded to murder two, which

0:20:53.382 --> 0:20:57.422
<v Speaker 1>frozsies is kind of like manslaughter. On what evidence was

0:20:57.422 --> 0:21:00.462
<v Speaker 1>that charge made? You've said that the prosecution claims that

0:21:00.862 --> 0:21:04.902
<v Speaker 1>the car backed into John, but what was the evidence

0:21:04.902 --> 0:21:05.622
<v Speaker 1>that that happened.

0:21:06.862 --> 0:21:11.422
<v Speaker 2>The evidence that they claim that proves Karen Reid hit

0:21:11.542 --> 0:21:15.422
<v Speaker 2>John O'Keeffe with her SUV is that there were microscopic

0:21:15.742 --> 0:21:22.182
<v Speaker 2>tail light pieces found on him, and there were tail

0:21:22.262 --> 0:21:25.422
<v Speaker 2>light pieces that were found around the scene underneath the snow.

0:21:25.542 --> 0:21:28.742
<v Speaker 2>So after they use the leaf blower to push all

0:21:28.782 --> 0:21:31.662
<v Speaker 2>the snow away, the state police finally come in with

0:21:31.742 --> 0:21:37.382
<v Speaker 2>shovels and find tail light pieces underneath the snow. And

0:21:37.422 --> 0:21:39.582
<v Speaker 2>so that's one of the contentious points of this case

0:21:39.622 --> 0:21:42.342
<v Speaker 2>is that nobody saw any tail light pieces until the

0:21:42.342 --> 0:21:46.862
<v Speaker 2>state police came in. And when you have an investigator

0:21:46.902 --> 0:21:49.422
<v Speaker 2>assigned to this case, who has as much history as

0:21:49.702 --> 0:21:53.702
<v Speaker 2>Trooper Proctor does. This is when the conspiracy starts to

0:21:53.982 --> 0:21:56.222
<v Speaker 2>really really boil to the surface.

0:21:57.222 --> 0:22:00.302
<v Speaker 1>Was there anything that directly challenged that version of events.

0:22:00.302 --> 0:22:03.942
<v Speaker 1>I've seen a lot of debate about that tail light evidence.

0:22:04.942 --> 0:22:08.702
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the tail light evidence is really kind of crazy

0:22:08.742 --> 0:22:13.182
<v Speaker 2>because even at the trial, the plastic bag that the

0:22:13.222 --> 0:22:16.862
<v Speaker 2>tail light pieces are in multiply over time, like the

0:22:16.902 --> 0:22:19.502
<v Speaker 2>pieces multiply, and so at one point there's only three,

0:22:19.622 --> 0:22:23.222
<v Speaker 2>then there's five, And even over the course of the

0:22:23.262 --> 0:22:28.622
<v Speaker 2>investigation of this case, they found tailight pieces near his body,

0:22:29.302 --> 0:22:33.182
<v Speaker 2>then they found the microscopic pieces on him. But when

0:22:33.222 --> 0:22:36.862
<v Speaker 2>you see pictures of Karen's suv, the taillight did not

0:22:37.022 --> 0:22:39.982
<v Speaker 2>look as broken when they brought the car in as

0:22:39.982 --> 0:22:43.742
<v Speaker 2>it did when it left there. And so there's this

0:22:44.302 --> 0:22:48.862
<v Speaker 2>surveillance footage of the quote Sally Port that the Massachusetts

0:22:48.902 --> 0:22:52.822
<v Speaker 2>State Police brought her suv to search it to give

0:22:52.862 --> 0:22:56.382
<v Speaker 2>it a very thorough look through. And one thing that

0:22:56.462 --> 0:22:59.302
<v Speaker 2>the defense notices right away is that this video appears

0:22:59.342 --> 0:23:03.062
<v Speaker 2>to be inverted, and so what looks to be the

0:23:03.342 --> 0:23:07.062
<v Speaker 2>passenger side is actually the driver side, and what looks

0:23:07.102 --> 0:23:09.622
<v Speaker 2>to be the driver side is actually the passenger side,

0:23:09.662 --> 0:23:13.102
<v Speaker 2>and supposedly it's the right rear tail light, so on

0:23:13.142 --> 0:23:17.862
<v Speaker 2>the passenger side that's broken, and on the video you

0:23:18.062 --> 0:23:22.702
<v Speaker 2>see two people walk by and appear to be fiddling

0:23:22.742 --> 0:23:25.662
<v Speaker 2>with something. But because this looks like it might be

0:23:25.902 --> 0:23:30.822
<v Speaker 2>the driver's side, nobody's really thinking anything of it until

0:23:30.862 --> 0:23:33.662
<v Speaker 2>it's pointed out in the trial that no, this video

0:23:33.702 --> 0:23:35.622
<v Speaker 2>is inverted. They see the number on the wall, the

0:23:35.662 --> 0:23:39.102
<v Speaker 2>four is backwards on the police cruiser is backwards, and

0:23:39.182 --> 0:23:45.502
<v Speaker 2>so it's very, very, very complicated. What they're implying through

0:23:45.542 --> 0:23:48.822
<v Speaker 2>all of this is that Trooper Procter planted evidence and

0:23:48.862 --> 0:23:51.462
<v Speaker 2>purposely broke the tail light and brought the tail light

0:23:51.462 --> 0:23:54.662
<v Speaker 2>pieces back to the scene to plant in the snow

0:23:55.342 --> 0:23:57.502
<v Speaker 2>to frame Karen Read for this murder.

0:23:57.742 --> 0:24:01.702
<v Speaker 1>Which is a huge thing to accuse local law enforcement

0:24:01.742 --> 0:24:02.342
<v Speaker 1>of doing right.

0:24:03.942 --> 0:24:09.022
<v Speaker 2>It's not unheard of. There's a history in this area

0:24:09.142 --> 0:24:13.302
<v Speaker 2>of not trusting lawn. A lot of people don't trust authority,

0:24:13.342 --> 0:24:15.782
<v Speaker 2>a lot of people don't trust the police, and so

0:24:17.022 --> 0:24:21.142
<v Speaker 2>you have like two sides forming do you trust the

0:24:21.222 --> 0:24:25.262
<v Speaker 2>police investigating this case, or do you believe that this

0:24:25.302 --> 0:24:28.102
<v Speaker 2>woman is being railroaded in the death of her cop

0:24:28.142 --> 0:24:33.022
<v Speaker 2>boyfriend but it's not unheard of for this area to

0:24:33.142 --> 0:24:39.862
<v Speaker 2>be suspicious of these investigators, and turns out a lot

0:24:39.902 --> 0:24:43.142
<v Speaker 2>of them were right based on what happens after the trial.

0:24:44.182 --> 0:24:48.942
<v Speaker 1>But what reason would these cops have to frame her?

0:24:49.142 --> 0:24:52.142
<v Speaker 1>What do they say happened? The defense to John.

0:24:53.502 --> 0:24:57.542
<v Speaker 2>The defens's theory of what happened that night is that

0:24:58.302 --> 0:25:01.942
<v Speaker 2>Karen drops John O'Keeffe off at the Alberts. He goes

0:25:01.982 --> 0:25:08.302
<v Speaker 2>into the house and is immediately confronted by people in

0:25:08.342 --> 0:25:12.302
<v Speaker 2>the basement of the Albut at home, there's a weight

0:25:12.382 --> 0:25:15.462
<v Speaker 2>room down there, and they think that a fight broke

0:25:15.502 --> 0:25:19.302
<v Speaker 2>out pretty quickly. Someone may have hit John O'Keeffe with

0:25:19.342 --> 0:25:22.182
<v Speaker 2>a dumbbell on the back of the head, maybe punched

0:25:22.262 --> 0:25:26.382
<v Speaker 2>him in the face, and then maybe perhaps he fought

0:25:26.462 --> 0:25:29.742
<v Speaker 2>back and the dog intervened and the dog attacked him.

0:25:30.622 --> 0:25:38.822
<v Speaker 2>And I don't think anyone intended for John o'keef to die. Now,

0:25:38.822 --> 0:25:41.462
<v Speaker 2>this is all alleged. This is a house full of

0:25:41.622 --> 0:25:45.262
<v Speaker 2>law enforcement, so they have to spend the next few

0:25:45.262 --> 0:25:49.822
<v Speaker 2>hours trying to figure out what to do, and their

0:25:49.902 --> 0:25:53.422
<v Speaker 2>theory is that they bring the body out through this

0:25:54.102 --> 0:25:57.942
<v Speaker 2>back set of stairs from the basement to the backyard

0:25:58.342 --> 0:26:00.662
<v Speaker 2>and bring the body around to the front yard and

0:26:00.742 --> 0:26:08.102
<v Speaker 2>lay him there with his phone underneath him.

0:26:08.182 --> 0:26:10.662
<v Speaker 1>Up next, we delve deeper into the trial well that

0:26:10.782 --> 0:26:14.102
<v Speaker 1>captivated the world and the text messages that put a

0:26:14.182 --> 0:26:33.342
<v Speaker 1>lead investigator on notice.

0:26:24.822 --> 0:26:29.142
<v Speaker 2>And he lies there until Karen finds him at six

0:26:29.182 --> 0:26:35.422
<v Speaker 2>in the morning. And so how does this turn into

0:26:35.622 --> 0:26:39.102
<v Speaker 2>a big cover up? Is that Trooper Proctor again is

0:26:39.222 --> 0:26:42.862
<v Speaker 2>friends with Brian Albert. There is a thin blue line

0:26:43.942 --> 0:26:49.462
<v Speaker 2>cops protect other cops, and cops don't get in trouble

0:26:49.502 --> 0:26:52.942
<v Speaker 2>for these types of things, and we don't investigate other cops,

0:26:53.422 --> 0:26:57.582
<v Speaker 2>and especially not our friends. And so Trooper Proctor obviously

0:26:57.702 --> 0:26:59.822
<v Speaker 2>knew when he was pulling up to this house that

0:26:59.902 --> 0:27:02.462
<v Speaker 2>this was the house of his friend, Brian Albert. He

0:27:02.662 --> 0:27:05.342
<v Speaker 2>chose not to go in and interview, he chose not

0:27:05.422 --> 0:27:08.102
<v Speaker 2>to lock down the crime scene, he chose not to

0:27:08.142 --> 0:27:12.102
<v Speaker 2>separate the witnesses, and there were a lot of missteps,

0:27:12.142 --> 0:27:15.342
<v Speaker 2>and all of this is captured in his own text

0:27:15.342 --> 0:27:18.502
<v Speaker 2>messages that he embarrassingly has to read on the stand

0:27:19.382 --> 0:27:24.062
<v Speaker 2>in front of the world, where he admits that he's

0:27:24.102 --> 0:27:26.622
<v Speaker 2>gonna make this case cut and dried and pin it

0:27:26.702 --> 0:27:29.582
<v Speaker 2>on the girl, and the girl is Karen read, and

0:27:29.622 --> 0:27:33.022
<v Speaker 2>then there's a lot of horrible text messages where he's

0:27:33.542 --> 0:27:37.382
<v Speaker 2>talking about her body and how hot she is and

0:27:37.422 --> 0:27:41.062
<v Speaker 2>how he hates her accent, and he calls her the

0:27:41.102 --> 0:27:44.502
<v Speaker 2>C word, and you know, there's just a lot of

0:27:44.582 --> 0:27:48.942
<v Speaker 2>really disgusting things said by this man to his superiors.

0:27:49.822 --> 0:27:52.382
<v Speaker 2>So you can tell this is kind of a culture, right,

0:27:52.982 --> 0:27:57.422
<v Speaker 2>a culture in this department, in this law enforcement community,

0:27:57.902 --> 0:28:01.182
<v Speaker 2>that they can do anything and get away with it,

0:28:01.662 --> 0:28:04.782
<v Speaker 2>and even so far as to say no nudes yet

0:28:04.822 --> 0:28:10.422
<v Speaker 2>because he was going through Karen's phone, Oh my gosh. Yeah,

0:28:10.582 --> 0:28:14.582
<v Speaker 2>So all of this combined it makes it look like

0:28:14.622 --> 0:28:17.142
<v Speaker 2>a cover up. It makes it look from the beginning that,

0:28:17.222 --> 0:28:20.542
<v Speaker 2>you know what, this was Brian's house. We can't have

0:28:20.622 --> 0:28:24.062
<v Speaker 2>this on Brian. Let's just pin it on the girl, like,

0:28:24.262 --> 0:28:26.702
<v Speaker 2>let's just put it on her. And this didn't even

0:28:26.742 --> 0:28:29.742
<v Speaker 2>have to be a murder case. This didn't even have

0:28:29.822 --> 0:28:31.662
<v Speaker 2>to go to trial when you really think about it,

0:28:31.702 --> 0:28:34.222
<v Speaker 2>this could have just been an accident. I don't know

0:28:34.742 --> 0:28:37.502
<v Speaker 2>if the defensis theory is correct. I don't know if

0:28:37.542 --> 0:28:39.582
<v Speaker 2>this was planned from the beginning to pin it on

0:28:39.662 --> 0:28:43.262
<v Speaker 2>Karen or whether it just happened naturally after she supposedly

0:28:43.302 --> 0:28:46.182
<v Speaker 2>said I hit him at the scene. It all starts

0:28:46.222 --> 0:28:49.662
<v Speaker 2>to build and build and build to make for a

0:28:49.862 --> 0:28:55.862
<v Speaker 2>very very interesting case with a trial that riveted thousands

0:28:55.902 --> 0:28:59.342
<v Speaker 2>and took over TikTok for like an entire week. While

0:28:59.342 --> 0:29:02.262
<v Speaker 2>Trooper Proctor is reading these text messages on the stand,

0:29:02.542 --> 0:29:05.782
<v Speaker 2>apparently to the horrified jurors. We spoke to a reporter.

0:29:05.862 --> 0:29:09.422
<v Speaker 2>He said that the jurors were just disgusted visibly by

0:29:09.462 --> 0:29:13.542
<v Speaker 2>these text messages and by Trooper Proctor. And one interesting

0:29:13.542 --> 0:29:16.302
<v Speaker 2>thing to note is that the jurors, who are a

0:29:16.422 --> 0:29:19.782
<v Speaker 2>very important element of this case, they were not allowed

0:29:19.822 --> 0:29:24.422
<v Speaker 2>to be aware that Trooper Proctor was under investigation at

0:29:24.422 --> 0:29:28.382
<v Speaker 2>this time for his behavior on this case. They're not

0:29:28.422 --> 0:29:30.182
<v Speaker 2>allowed to know that, and they're not supposed to be

0:29:30.262 --> 0:29:33.022
<v Speaker 2>looking up information about the case after they leave. They're

0:29:33.022 --> 0:29:35.142
<v Speaker 2>not sequestered, so it's not like they're staying in a

0:29:35.182 --> 0:29:39.782
<v Speaker 2>hotel with no TV, no phone, no news. They're just

0:29:39.822 --> 0:29:41.902
<v Speaker 2>not supposed to be talking about it, and they're not

0:29:41.902 --> 0:29:44.662
<v Speaker 2>supposed to be looking up in information about it. So

0:29:45.902 --> 0:29:48.862
<v Speaker 2>not having that information is pretty interesting. But I think

0:29:48.902 --> 0:29:53.142
<v Speaker 2>he kind of you said it all himself on the stand.

0:29:53.582 --> 0:29:55.982
<v Speaker 1>Before we get more into the trial. I think it's

0:29:55.982 --> 0:29:59.782
<v Speaker 1>worth backtracking a bit to TikTok because, as you mentioned,

0:30:00.382 --> 0:30:03.222
<v Speaker 1>this case exploded. People might have heard of book talk.

0:30:03.382 --> 0:30:05.742
<v Speaker 1>There's also crime talk out there, and this was one

0:30:05.782 --> 0:30:09.342
<v Speaker 1>of those cases that just captivated the internet. And I

0:30:09.382 --> 0:30:11.302
<v Speaker 1>need to bring in Total Books because he's one of

0:30:11.342 --> 0:30:14.022
<v Speaker 1>the nine reasons for that. Who on earth is Total

0:30:14.062 --> 0:30:16.542
<v Speaker 1>Boy and why is he kind of the one that

0:30:16.622 --> 0:30:17.662
<v Speaker 1>helped fuel all of this?

0:30:18.582 --> 0:30:21.662
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So Aidan Kearney is his real name, and he

0:30:21.982 --> 0:30:26.342
<v Speaker 2>goes by Turtle Boy. He's a local Massachusetts blogger. He's

0:30:26.582 --> 0:30:29.302
<v Speaker 2>had this blog for over ten years and he's really

0:30:29.382 --> 0:30:32.382
<v Speaker 2>known for his bravado and his kind of like take

0:30:32.462 --> 0:30:36.902
<v Speaker 2>no shit attitude. He's credited with bringing the Reed trial

0:30:36.982 --> 0:30:41.102
<v Speaker 2>to the public's attention and mobilizing the quote free Karen

0:30:41.142 --> 0:30:44.942
<v Speaker 2>Reid movement that ended up resulting in crowds and crowds

0:30:44.942 --> 0:30:48.222
<v Speaker 2>of people forming outside of the courthouse wearing these pink

0:30:48.262 --> 0:30:51.662
<v Speaker 2>shirts and solidarity with Kiaren with their signs, and it

0:30:51.702 --> 0:30:53.662
<v Speaker 2>really kind of took on the air of like a

0:30:53.702 --> 0:30:58.582
<v Speaker 2>celebrity trial for this tiny little town in Massachusetts. And

0:30:58.622 --> 0:31:03.862
<v Speaker 2>that's all because of Aiden Kearney, and he through our podcast,

0:31:04.062 --> 0:31:08.822
<v Speaker 2>which is just you know, affectually called Karen. We found

0:31:09.022 --> 0:31:13.462
<v Speaker 2>that Aidan Kearney was actually pretty heavily involved with the

0:31:13.502 --> 0:31:16.942
<v Speaker 2>defense before this case went to trial. He fed them

0:31:17.062 --> 0:31:21.942
<v Speaker 2>a lot of information about the Alberts and the mccabs,

0:31:22.142 --> 0:31:24.542
<v Speaker 2>and he found a lot of this through his own

0:31:24.582 --> 0:31:29.542
<v Speaker 2>investigative work. Now he has been charged with witness intimidation

0:31:29.902 --> 0:31:32.302
<v Speaker 2>and so you know, he's not a perfect person to

0:31:32.342 --> 0:31:35.422
<v Speaker 2>be aligned with as a defense attorney. But at the

0:31:35.422 --> 0:31:40.422
<v Speaker 2>same time, he really exposed the police cover up and

0:31:40.502 --> 0:31:44.342
<v Speaker 2>the corruption in this town and the conspiracy surrounding this case.

0:31:44.382 --> 0:31:45.022
<v Speaker 2>In particular.

0:31:45.742 --> 0:31:49.022
<v Speaker 1>He was also quite involved with Karen Rott mm hm.

0:31:49.982 --> 0:31:53.742
<v Speaker 2>So it turns out that Turtle Boy and Karen were

0:31:54.182 --> 0:31:56.262
<v Speaker 2>talking a lot. They talked a lot on the phone.

0:31:56.662 --> 0:31:59.622
<v Speaker 2>There was dozens and dozens of phone calls between the

0:31:59.662 --> 0:32:02.902
<v Speaker 2>two of them. She would feed him information, he would

0:32:02.902 --> 0:32:07.462
<v Speaker 2>feed her information, And yeah, they were pretty chummy there

0:32:07.502 --> 0:32:11.102
<v Speaker 2>at the beginning. And I don't necessarily think this is

0:32:11.182 --> 0:32:13.262
<v Speaker 2>a bad thing as long as you know he has

0:32:13.342 --> 0:32:17.462
<v Speaker 2>sources to back up like what he's saying. But the

0:32:17.542 --> 0:32:21.342
<v Speaker 2>defense was basically given a gift in Aiden Kearney to

0:32:22.542 --> 0:32:25.862
<v Speaker 2>really bolster this this conspiracy theory.

0:32:26.622 --> 0:32:28.422
<v Speaker 1>Let's get to the trial, because it was a very

0:32:28.462 --> 0:32:32.502
<v Speaker 1>long trial went for nine ten weeks, which is huge

0:32:32.862 --> 0:32:36.942
<v Speaker 1>for something like this. Was there anything that stood out

0:32:36.982 --> 0:32:39.542
<v Speaker 1>to you? Obviously we knew all of this web that

0:32:39.542 --> 0:32:43.662
<v Speaker 1>had been built beforehand, all of these players. How did

0:32:43.702 --> 0:32:44.462
<v Speaker 1>you find the trial?

0:32:45.822 --> 0:32:51.702
<v Speaker 2>The trial was super entertaining and long and maybe a

0:32:51.742 --> 0:32:57.622
<v Speaker 2>bit in the weeds more than people really want to experience.

0:32:57.702 --> 0:33:00.862
<v Speaker 2>You know, in your regular courtroom drama that you're watching,

0:33:00.902 --> 0:33:03.262
<v Speaker 2>you only get the fiery good stuff, which there was

0:33:03.302 --> 0:33:05.742
<v Speaker 2>a ton of that in this trial. There was a

0:33:05.822 --> 0:33:08.062
<v Speaker 2>lot of funny moments on the stand, a lot of

0:33:08.982 --> 0:33:13.142
<v Speaker 2>people who maybe could have view some better prep before

0:33:13.182 --> 0:33:16.542
<v Speaker 2>they went on the stand to testify. But in the end,

0:33:16.582 --> 0:33:22.022
<v Speaker 2>this was a very emotional, very heated, very caustic trial

0:33:22.582 --> 0:33:28.022
<v Speaker 2>with really great defenders of Karen Reid. Her defense attorneys

0:33:28.102 --> 0:33:33.462
<v Speaker 2>were top notch. They gave great performances in front of

0:33:33.502 --> 0:33:37.022
<v Speaker 2>this jury, and the prosecution in turn ended up looking

0:33:37.062 --> 0:33:40.102
<v Speaker 2>a little silly because they brought all of these witnesses

0:33:40.902 --> 0:33:46.502
<v Speaker 2>who basically have nothing to say. They all agree that

0:33:46.622 --> 0:33:49.942
<v Speaker 2>John O'Keefe never entered the house. They quote the guy

0:33:50.022 --> 0:33:52.702
<v Speaker 2>never went in the house. And the thing about that

0:33:52.822 --> 0:33:55.662
<v Speaker 2>is is that they're all on text messages together like

0:33:55.742 --> 0:33:58.582
<v Speaker 2>a text chain, kind of looking like they're trying to

0:33:58.622 --> 0:34:02.222
<v Speaker 2>get their story straight. And so all these people are

0:34:02.222 --> 0:34:06.102
<v Speaker 2>on the stand being grilled about these text messages. And

0:34:06.462 --> 0:34:08.502
<v Speaker 2>that's the other thing. When you're a witness in a

0:34:08.542 --> 0:34:11.062
<v Speaker 2>case like this, you have to turn over your phone,

0:34:11.102 --> 0:34:15.782
<v Speaker 2>and everyone did except for Brian Albert and Brian Higgins,

0:34:15.822 --> 0:34:19.862
<v Speaker 2>because their phones were destroyed right before the police were

0:34:19.942 --> 0:34:20.942
<v Speaker 2>able to collect them.

0:34:21.502 --> 0:34:22.542
<v Speaker 1>What which ends.

0:34:22.422 --> 0:34:25.622
<v Speaker 2>Up becoming a pretty huge part of Brian Higgins's testimony

0:34:26.142 --> 0:34:28.382
<v Speaker 2>so far, This is the standout moment to me, besides

0:34:28.422 --> 0:34:31.062
<v Speaker 2>the Trooper Proctor stuff, which was absolutely insane and at

0:34:31.142 --> 0:34:38.142
<v Speaker 2>least mildly entertaining Brian Higgins. It meant to destroying his phone,

0:34:38.262 --> 0:34:42.222
<v Speaker 2>not backing it up, and taking the SIM card out

0:34:42.262 --> 0:34:45.742
<v Speaker 2>of his phone and driving to a military base to

0:34:45.822 --> 0:34:49.102
<v Speaker 2>dispose of it in a bag along with his phone.

0:34:49.622 --> 0:34:52.982
<v Speaker 2>And the only thing that he saved were his texts

0:34:52.982 --> 0:34:54.902
<v Speaker 2>between Karen and John.

0:34:56.102 --> 0:34:59.022
<v Speaker 1>And to be clear, this is the Brian that was

0:34:59.062 --> 0:35:05.142
<v Speaker 1>sharing flirtatious text messages with correct Okay, I want to

0:35:05.142 --> 0:35:09.462
<v Speaker 1>bring in a search term used by Karen either before

0:35:09.542 --> 0:35:12.062
<v Speaker 1>or after she found Jill because it's also a really

0:35:12.102 --> 0:35:15.262
<v Speaker 1>important thing to bring in the text or the search

0:35:15.462 --> 0:35:19.302
<v Speaker 1>is how long to die in cold? Why was that

0:35:19.502 --> 0:35:21.062
<v Speaker 1>so heavily scrutinized.

0:35:22.622 --> 0:35:28.342
<v Speaker 2>Jennifer McCabe is the prosecution's star witness, or so they think,

0:35:28.622 --> 0:35:31.302
<v Speaker 2>and they put her on the stand. She's very confident

0:35:31.422 --> 0:35:34.462
<v Speaker 2>on her first day on the stand against some pretty

0:35:34.502 --> 0:35:38.982
<v Speaker 2>tough cross examination. But there's this Google search that happened

0:35:40.182 --> 0:35:43.182
<v Speaker 2>at around six point thirty in the morning, six twenty

0:35:43.222 --> 0:35:48.182
<v Speaker 2>two and six twenty three am, where she says that

0:35:48.582 --> 0:35:51.662
<v Speaker 2>Karen told her to google how long does it take

0:35:51.742 --> 0:35:54.062
<v Speaker 2>for a person to die in the cold, And because

0:35:54.102 --> 0:35:58.302
<v Speaker 2>it's such a chaotic scene it's so cold, she mistypes

0:35:58.342 --> 0:36:00.662
<v Speaker 2>it and ends up being like, has slung to die

0:36:00.742 --> 0:36:04.302
<v Speaker 2>in cold? And cold's misspelled? And how's misspelled? And the

0:36:04.342 --> 0:36:09.182
<v Speaker 2>search is done twice. But when this data is analyzed

0:36:09.262 --> 0:36:12.942
<v Speaker 2>by this company called Celebrate, it turns out that the

0:36:13.022 --> 0:36:18.542
<v Speaker 2>first time this was searched was at two twenty seven am.

0:36:18.942 --> 0:36:24.302
<v Speaker 2>So if Jennifer McCabe, the sister in law of the homeowner,

0:36:25.022 --> 0:36:27.382
<v Speaker 2>was searching how long to die in the cold at

0:36:27.382 --> 0:36:31.422
<v Speaker 2>two twenty seven am, this exonerates Karen one hundred percent

0:36:31.582 --> 0:36:37.582
<v Speaker 2>because clearly someone in that house knew that someone was

0:36:37.622 --> 0:36:42.662
<v Speaker 2>outside dying and they did nothing about it. However, the

0:36:42.742 --> 0:36:51.182
<v Speaker 2>Celebrate expert that the prosecution uses says this search did

0:36:51.222 --> 0:36:55.462
<v Speaker 2>not take place at twenty seven in the morning. She

0:36:55.662 --> 0:36:59.382
<v Speaker 2>had a browser opened at two twenty seven in the morning,

0:36:59.462 --> 0:37:01.902
<v Speaker 2>and when she went to go Google it at six

0:37:01.902 --> 0:37:05.662
<v Speaker 2>point twenty two in the morning, it made it look

0:37:05.862 --> 0:37:09.102
<v Speaker 2>like because she had just used the same browser that

0:37:09.142 --> 0:37:11.942
<v Speaker 2>she was using at two thirty am looking up basketball

0:37:11.942 --> 0:37:14.222
<v Speaker 2>stuff for her daughter, it made it look like the

0:37:14.302 --> 0:37:17.902
<v Speaker 2>search was actually performed then, but that's just when the

0:37:17.942 --> 0:37:24.742
<v Speaker 2>browser was last used. However, the defense argues the opposite,

0:37:24.782 --> 0:37:28.102
<v Speaker 2>that they have a newer version of the Celebrate data

0:37:28.262 --> 0:37:31.262
<v Speaker 2>and that proves that the search was conducted at two

0:37:31.342 --> 0:37:35.662
<v Speaker 2>twenty seven am and also again when instructed by Karen

0:37:35.702 --> 0:37:40.942
<v Speaker 2>Reid to perform the search. So, I mean, ultimately, if

0:37:40.982 --> 0:37:43.382
<v Speaker 2>the search did not happen at two twenty seven am,

0:37:43.582 --> 0:37:47.062
<v Speaker 2>this evidence is completely like moot. It doesn't matter. But

0:37:47.182 --> 0:37:50.062
<v Speaker 2>this is like three days of the trial is going

0:37:50.102 --> 0:37:52.022
<v Speaker 2>over this search term.

0:37:52.302 --> 0:37:55.182
<v Speaker 1>Well, this just gives you a taste of just how

0:37:55.182 --> 0:38:00.222
<v Speaker 1>confusing this tist becomes and how complicated all of these

0:38:00.702 --> 0:38:04.742
<v Speaker 1>moving pots are, I don't envy the jury? How did

0:38:04.742 --> 0:38:05.422
<v Speaker 1>that go with it?

0:38:06.622 --> 0:38:09.582
<v Speaker 2>So the jury deliberated for over twenty hours over the

0:38:09.622 --> 0:38:13.942
<v Speaker 2>course of five days and lawng Crime. We live streamed

0:38:13.982 --> 0:38:19.062
<v Speaker 2>the entire trial. We had forty thousand people watching. I

0:38:19.102 --> 0:38:21.222
<v Speaker 2>think like at the most there was like fifty thousand

0:38:21.222 --> 0:38:24.462
<v Speaker 2>people in the live stream at the highest peak. And

0:38:25.462 --> 0:38:28.382
<v Speaker 2>it was a Friday afternoon. Everyone thought, we're going to

0:38:28.422 --> 0:38:31.302
<v Speaker 2>get a verdict. The jurors surely want to be done

0:38:31.342 --> 0:38:33.942
<v Speaker 2>with this, right. Well, no, they decide they want to

0:38:33.942 --> 0:38:35.862
<v Speaker 2>take the weekend to think about it, and they come

0:38:35.942 --> 0:38:40.302
<v Speaker 2>back on Monday and they say they're deadlocked. They say

0:38:40.342 --> 0:38:44.662
<v Speaker 2>they cannot come to a unanimous decision and that if

0:38:44.702 --> 0:38:51.142
<v Speaker 2>they were to continue deliberating, it would only result in

0:38:51.222 --> 0:38:56.182
<v Speaker 2>one of them having to compromise on their beliefs, and

0:38:56.502 --> 0:38:58.782
<v Speaker 2>they didn't feel like they were going to be able

0:38:58.822 --> 0:39:02.542
<v Speaker 2>to do that, and so they deliver this super eloquent

0:39:02.622 --> 0:39:06.062
<v Speaker 2>message to the judge. The judge accepts it and declares

0:39:06.262 --> 0:39:10.462
<v Speaker 2>a mistrial, which did not surprise a lot of the

0:39:10.542 --> 0:39:14.782
<v Speaker 2>legal analysts and reporters watching this case, because, as you

0:39:14.822 --> 0:39:18.862
<v Speaker 2>can tell, everything we've talked about, this was pretty complicated.

0:39:19.142 --> 0:39:21.462
<v Speaker 2>You know, in essence, it's a he said, she said

0:39:21.742 --> 0:39:24.382
<v Speaker 2>with a lot of the evidence, like they say this

0:39:24.502 --> 0:39:26.662
<v Speaker 2>tail light evidence was there, and the other side says

0:39:26.662 --> 0:39:29.782
<v Speaker 2>it wasn't. And so that's basically like the Google search,

0:39:30.302 --> 0:39:34.862
<v Speaker 2>the tail light, the body itself, everything has two sides

0:39:34.902 --> 0:39:38.142
<v Speaker 2>to it, and so it's no surprise that these jurors

0:39:38.182 --> 0:39:42.262
<v Speaker 2>weren't unable to come to a unanimous decision. In my opinion, Well.

0:39:42.142 --> 0:39:43.582
<v Speaker 1>At the end of the day, all you have to

0:39:43.622 --> 0:39:47.382
<v Speaker 1>do is prove that there is reasonable doubt.

0:39:47.502 --> 0:39:50.782
<v Speaker 2>Well exactly, and so a lot of people that we

0:39:50.862 --> 0:39:54.542
<v Speaker 2>talked to for the podcast actually said that that was

0:39:54.662 --> 0:39:58.702
<v Speaker 2>an interesting position for Alan Jackson and David Ynetti to take,

0:39:59.382 --> 0:40:02.582
<v Speaker 2>was to come up with this third culprit theory. And

0:40:02.622 --> 0:40:05.062
<v Speaker 2>you know, they fought in pre trial hearings to even

0:40:05.102 --> 0:40:09.622
<v Speaker 2>be able to bring this into the trial, because the

0:40:09.662 --> 0:40:12.502
<v Speaker 2>American legal is absolutely insane. You have to like have

0:40:12.942 --> 0:40:16.862
<v Speaker 2>a bajillion pre trial hearings in order to present anything

0:40:16.862 --> 0:40:20.142
<v Speaker 2>that you basically want to say, and so they had

0:40:20.142 --> 0:40:23.302
<v Speaker 2>to get permission to be able to say if she

0:40:23.382 --> 0:40:27.422
<v Speaker 2>didn't do it, someone else did, and we want to

0:40:27.462 --> 0:40:30.342
<v Speaker 2>say there's a third party culprit, and we want to

0:40:30.542 --> 0:40:33.822
<v Speaker 2>explain how we think it happened, And so a lot

0:40:33.862 --> 0:40:37.582
<v Speaker 2>of people said there was enough reasonable doubt without even

0:40:38.262 --> 0:40:40.902
<v Speaker 2>this theory that he was beat up in the home,

0:40:41.382 --> 0:40:44.782
<v Speaker 2>dragged out of the back the basement, left there to

0:40:44.902 --> 0:40:47.542
<v Speaker 2>die by this group of people, and that fifty people

0:40:47.582 --> 0:40:51.102
<v Speaker 2>in the end end up agreeing to this one story

0:40:51.302 --> 0:40:54.822
<v Speaker 2>to protect themselves and blame it all on this one woman.

0:40:55.582 --> 0:40:58.942
<v Speaker 2>Was that even necessary, because if you strip all that away,

0:40:59.822 --> 0:41:03.302
<v Speaker 2>there is so much reasonable doubt even with the story

0:41:03.382 --> 0:41:07.622
<v Speaker 2>the prosecution wanted the jury to believe. So if this

0:41:07.742 --> 0:41:10.222
<v Speaker 2>case does end up going to a new trial, with

0:41:10.422 --> 0:41:13.142
<v Speaker 2>which the prosecution has said that they intend to retry

0:41:13.142 --> 0:41:16.422
<v Speaker 2>the case, Karen's team says that they are ready for

0:41:16.502 --> 0:41:20.262
<v Speaker 2>the fight. But there was a motion to dismiss in

0:41:20.342 --> 0:41:23.942
<v Speaker 2>early August, and the judge is still considering that motion

0:41:24.222 --> 0:41:27.942
<v Speaker 2>as we speak now, and the new trials already set

0:41:28.022 --> 0:41:29.462
<v Speaker 2>for late January.

0:41:29.262 --> 0:41:33.542
<v Speaker 1>Twenty five five. A few things did happen not long

0:41:33.582 --> 0:41:36.582
<v Speaker 1>after that mistrial, which is not that long ago from

0:41:36.582 --> 0:41:40.702
<v Speaker 1>when we're having this conversation Michael Procter. He was relieved

0:41:40.742 --> 0:41:43.862
<v Speaker 1>of his duty then suspended without pay. Was that surprising,

0:41:44.942 --> 0:41:45.502
<v Speaker 1>not at all?

0:41:45.622 --> 0:41:49.462
<v Speaker 2>I think a lot of people were suspecting that they

0:41:49.502 --> 0:41:52.462
<v Speaker 2>wanted to relieve him of his duties during the trial,

0:41:52.542 --> 0:41:56.622
<v Speaker 2>but they didn't want to complicate matters or mess up

0:41:56.622 --> 0:42:00.142
<v Speaker 2>the case for the prosecution. So yeah, he was relieved

0:42:00.142 --> 0:42:03.462
<v Speaker 2>of his duties. And then it's revealed that there are

0:42:03.582 --> 0:42:05.942
<v Speaker 2>two more people from the state police that are being

0:42:06.022 --> 0:42:11.742
<v Speaker 2>investigated for their actions in this case. So that's three

0:42:13.622 --> 0:42:19.022
<v Speaker 2>investigators compromised. And that's a problem for the prosecution because

0:42:19.022 --> 0:42:20.622
<v Speaker 2>if you really are going to want to bring this

0:42:20.702 --> 0:42:23.422
<v Speaker 2>case a trial, you have three poison apples who are

0:42:23.502 --> 0:42:27.182
<v Speaker 2>supposed to be your line of protection, Like these are

0:42:27.222 --> 0:42:29.902
<v Speaker 2>the people that were supposed to trust their the authority.

0:42:29.902 --> 0:42:32.062
<v Speaker 2>We're supposed to be able to believe everything that they

0:42:32.102 --> 0:42:35.382
<v Speaker 2>say on the stand because they're the ones investigating. And

0:42:36.422 --> 0:42:37.942
<v Speaker 2>what do you do after that?

0:42:39.342 --> 0:42:41.662
<v Speaker 1>Do you honestly think, after digging so deep into this

0:42:41.782 --> 0:42:45.622
<v Speaker 1>case that we could see a different result if this

0:42:45.702 --> 0:42:46.582
<v Speaker 1>goes to trial again.

0:42:47.862 --> 0:42:50.382
<v Speaker 2>It's hard to say. I mean, I do wonder how

0:42:50.462 --> 0:42:53.542
<v Speaker 2>the defense would maybe change course, if they're going to

0:42:53.662 --> 0:42:58.502
<v Speaker 2>still stick with this third party culprit defense, or if

0:42:58.542 --> 0:43:02.542
<v Speaker 2>they are just going to allow the prosecution to dig

0:43:02.582 --> 0:43:05.662
<v Speaker 2>their own graves, so to speak, and just allow the

0:43:05.742 --> 0:43:11.142
<v Speaker 2>reasonable doubt to shine, because there really is no solid

0:43:11.222 --> 0:43:17.582
<v Speaker 2>proof that Karen Reid killed John O'Keefe, and murder too

0:43:17.662 --> 0:43:21.702
<v Speaker 2>is manslaughter, but there's also no intent there. And does

0:43:21.742 --> 0:43:25.902
<v Speaker 2>this woman deserve to spend upwards of twenty plus years

0:43:25.902 --> 0:43:29.942
<v Speaker 2>in prison for an accident? You know, obviously this family

0:43:30.422 --> 0:43:37.502
<v Speaker 2>deserves justice, and they are very upset with how famous

0:43:37.502 --> 0:43:40.382
<v Speaker 2>this case has become and how Karen Reid's popularity has

0:43:40.422 --> 0:43:44.062
<v Speaker 2>grown over this, and they deserve some kind of closure.

0:43:44.542 --> 0:43:48.542
<v Speaker 2>But I just don't know if any closure will come

0:43:48.542 --> 0:43:53.262
<v Speaker 2>from another trial unless new evidence is uncovered.

0:43:54.142 --> 0:43:56.222
<v Speaker 1>The other thing to come out after the mistrial was

0:43:56.222 --> 0:43:58.702
<v Speaker 1>the jurors actually coming forward and speaking, which I'm not

0:43:58.742 --> 0:44:02.382
<v Speaker 1>sure is completely legal, but what did they actually say?

0:44:03.262 --> 0:44:07.942
<v Speaker 2>So after the mistrial was declared and Trooper Proctor was

0:44:07.982 --> 0:44:12.102
<v Speaker 2>fired from the Massachusetts State Police, a lot of jurors,

0:44:12.382 --> 0:44:16.822
<v Speaker 2>forgers to be exact, came forward pretty quickly, and they

0:44:16.862 --> 0:44:19.462
<v Speaker 2>went to Alan Jackson and David Yanetti first, and they said,

0:44:19.982 --> 0:44:24.742
<v Speaker 2>we reached two unanimous decisions. Out of the three charges,

0:44:25.382 --> 0:44:29.422
<v Speaker 2>we reached unanimous decisions on two of the charges. There

0:44:29.462 --> 0:44:32.662
<v Speaker 2>was only one we couldn't agree on, which this was

0:44:32.702 --> 0:44:36.262
<v Speaker 2>actually a big part of the arguments on the defensive

0:44:36.302 --> 0:44:39.422
<v Speaker 2>side during the trial is that the jury instructions were

0:44:39.542 --> 0:44:44.862
<v Speaker 2>very confusing, and they felt that they were purposely confusing,

0:44:44.902 --> 0:44:47.662
<v Speaker 2>and that the judge didn't write them out correctly or

0:44:47.662 --> 0:44:50.182
<v Speaker 2>didn't explain them correctly, and so it could lead to

0:44:50.222 --> 0:44:54.022
<v Speaker 2>something like this happening. And a bunch of jurors then

0:44:54.102 --> 0:44:56.942
<v Speaker 2>went to the district attorney's office and said the same thing.

0:44:57.542 --> 0:45:01.862
<v Speaker 2>And the reason why this is important is because in

0:45:01.902 --> 0:45:06.142
<v Speaker 2>the United States of America, there's this rule called double jeopardy,

0:45:06.502 --> 0:45:12.462
<v Speaker 2>and you cannot be prosecuted again for the same charges

0:45:12.862 --> 0:45:18.262
<v Speaker 2>if a jury found you innocent of them. And so

0:45:18.342 --> 0:45:21.342
<v Speaker 2>the only one they couldn't come to a conclusion on

0:45:22.262 --> 0:45:24.022
<v Speaker 2>was the one that had to do with the vehicle.

0:45:24.782 --> 0:45:28.462
<v Speaker 1>So they agreed on the murder charge. Well, the manslaughter

0:45:28.462 --> 0:45:29.022
<v Speaker 1>of charge.

0:45:29.422 --> 0:45:33.102
<v Speaker 2>Yes, the jury was unanimous in finding Read not guilty

0:45:33.182 --> 0:45:37.782
<v Speaker 2>of second degree murder and leaving the scene of personal

0:45:37.782 --> 0:45:42.582
<v Speaker 2>injury and death. They found her unanimously innocent not guilty

0:45:42.742 --> 0:45:46.862
<v Speaker 2>of these charges on manslaughter and the lesser included charges.

0:45:47.182 --> 0:45:50.302
<v Speaker 2>The juror said. The jury's final vote was a quote

0:45:50.382 --> 0:45:58.662
<v Speaker 2>soft nine to three, with nine voting guilty. So This

0:45:58.902 --> 0:46:01.782
<v Speaker 2>is something that the judge is really going to have

0:46:01.822 --> 0:46:04.222
<v Speaker 2>to consider very seriously, and that's why I'm not surprised

0:46:04.262 --> 0:46:07.102
<v Speaker 2>that it's taking her quite a long time to come

0:46:07.142 --> 0:46:07.902
<v Speaker 2>to this decision.

0:46:08.822 --> 0:46:10.102
<v Speaker 1>With all of that in mind, I'm going to ask

0:46:10.182 --> 0:46:14.102
<v Speaker 1>one final question. Do you think the Internet and the

0:46:14.142 --> 0:46:17.222
<v Speaker 1>Free Karen movement, given all of this stuff that's come

0:46:17.262 --> 0:46:20.102
<v Speaker 1>out since the mistrial, do you think this is just

0:46:20.102 --> 0:46:21.062
<v Speaker 1>going to keep exploding?

0:46:22.302 --> 0:46:25.382
<v Speaker 2>I do, and I think that Turtle Boy's going to

0:46:25.422 --> 0:46:27.142
<v Speaker 2>have a lot to do with that. You know, he

0:46:27.222 --> 0:46:31.622
<v Speaker 2>got a lot of fame from this. He says that

0:46:31.742 --> 0:46:37.702
<v Speaker 2>he's received a podcast and movie deal, and the TikTok

0:46:37.942 --> 0:46:42.782
<v Speaker 2>In Couch detectives are still at it with exposing what

0:46:42.902 --> 0:46:46.982
<v Speaker 2>they think are important details that, of course, you can't

0:46:47.222 --> 0:46:52.622
<v Speaker 2>prove in any courtroom. And I think that the Internet

0:46:52.702 --> 0:46:55.502
<v Speaker 2>is a perfect place for a conspiracy theory to grow

0:46:55.582 --> 0:47:00.262
<v Speaker 2>and grow and grow and grow. And if the judge

0:47:00.262 --> 0:47:02.902
<v Speaker 2>comes back and says we're not going to try this

0:47:03.022 --> 0:47:07.302
<v Speaker 2>case again, I think it would die out eventually. But

0:47:07.422 --> 0:47:10.982
<v Speaker 2>if she says no, we're going back to trial, this

0:47:11.022 --> 0:47:13.782
<v Speaker 2>is never going to die. It's going to get even

0:47:13.862 --> 0:47:18.422
<v Speaker 2>more attention because there's a Netflix documentary coming out. You know,

0:47:18.502 --> 0:47:21.262
<v Speaker 2>our podcast is out. Your podcast is going to be

0:47:21.302 --> 0:47:24.582
<v Speaker 2>coming out. Every true crime podcast is talking about this,

0:47:24.702 --> 0:47:27.342
<v Speaker 2>and so there's going to be probably like ten times

0:47:27.382 --> 0:47:31.182
<v Speaker 2>the amount of ears and eyeballs on this than there

0:47:31.342 --> 0:47:35.782
<v Speaker 2>was in the first place. And so, unfortunately, conspiracy theories

0:47:36.142 --> 0:47:39.982
<v Speaker 2>and really interesting cases like this are just bound to

0:47:40.022 --> 0:47:43.902
<v Speaker 2>grow and grow and grow until someone says, Okay, here's

0:47:43.902 --> 0:47:44.502
<v Speaker 2>your closure.

0:47:49.702 --> 0:47:52.342
<v Speaker 1>Thanks to Jessica for assisting us to tell this story.

0:47:52.782 --> 0:47:55.862
<v Speaker 1>True Crime Conversations is a Muma mea podcast hosted and

0:47:55.862 --> 0:47:59.702
<v Speaker 1>produced by me Jemma Buff with audio design by Scott Stronik.

0:48:00.262 --> 0:48:04.182
<v Speaker 1>Our senior producer is Crystal corn Nielssen. Thanks for listening.

0:48:04.182 --> 0:48:07.022
<v Speaker 1>I'll be back next week with another True Crime Conversation