WEBVTT - Kim Kardashian Is In Her Flop Era

0:00:08.193 --> 0:00:12.914
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to a Mom and mea podcast.

0:00:16.034 --> 0:00:18.354
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to Mama out Loud. What women are actually talking

0:00:18.393 --> 0:00:21.714
<v Speaker 2>about on Monday, the tenth of November. I am Jesse Stevens,

0:00:21.834 --> 0:00:25.514
<v Speaker 2>I am Amelia Lester, I'm Claire Murphy. And I don't

0:00:25.514 --> 0:00:27.474
<v Speaker 2>know if you know this, guys, but there's this actress

0:00:27.634 --> 0:00:30.594
<v Speaker 2>who's been really doing a great job on not a

0:00:30.594 --> 0:00:35.114
<v Speaker 2>great job at all acasm called Kim Kardashian. You might

0:00:35.114 --> 0:00:35.834
<v Speaker 2>be across her.

0:00:36.314 --> 0:00:39.434
<v Speaker 1>She's not been doing so well this week. She'd have

0:00:39.513 --> 0:00:40.993
<v Speaker 1>it a bit of a rough time. I think she

0:00:41.233 --> 0:00:45.193
<v Speaker 1>might have just hit failure era. And so I would

0:00:45.273 --> 0:00:47.793
<v Speaker 1>like to just have a moment with you all to

0:00:47.833 --> 0:00:50.353
<v Speaker 1>discuss how a multi up presuming she's a billionaire now

0:00:50.473 --> 0:00:53.754
<v Speaker 1>multimillion billionaire, whatever she is, woman who has a thousand

0:00:53.794 --> 0:00:54.994
<v Speaker 1>businesses is now failing?

0:00:55.474 --> 0:01:00.114
<v Speaker 3>Can you be friends with people who believe very different

0:01:00.154 --> 0:01:00.714
<v Speaker 3>things from you?

0:01:00.794 --> 0:01:01.354
<v Speaker 1>Politically?

0:01:01.834 --> 0:01:06.354
<v Speaker 3>I want to talk about Jennifer Lawrence's answer to that question.

0:01:06.674 --> 0:01:12.194
<v Speaker 2>And did women ruin the workplace? Allegedly they did? I

0:01:12.274 --> 0:01:15.234
<v Speaker 2>knew that we've done, say exactly exactly, in which case

0:01:15.274 --> 0:01:16.754
<v Speaker 2>my question is can we all go home now?

0:01:16.834 --> 0:01:18.953
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? I was feeling guilty at three am the other morning.

0:01:19.034 --> 0:01:22.354
<v Speaker 1>That must have been in first of though. Friends. In

0:01:22.354 --> 0:01:25.354
<v Speaker 1>case you missed it, the VIC government announced their big

0:01:25.474 --> 0:01:29.114
<v Speaker 1>Women's pain report from their inquiry yesterday. I don't know

0:01:29.114 --> 0:01:32.554
<v Speaker 1>if you heard. They announced this pilot initiative to give

0:01:32.594 --> 0:01:36.514
<v Speaker 1>women getting their IUDs inserted the green whistle. And first

0:01:36.554 --> 0:01:37.994
<v Speaker 1>of all, we need to establish who here has had

0:01:37.994 --> 0:01:40.874
<v Speaker 1>a green whistle experience. Jesse Emelia, I don't know what

0:01:40.954 --> 0:01:41.314
<v Speaker 1>that is.

0:01:41.554 --> 0:01:45.474
<v Speaker 2>Oh my goodness, I'm obsessed with green whistles because I desperately.

0:01:45.154 --> 0:01:46.594
<v Speaker 1>Do you have one? When you broke you? Let no.

0:01:46.914 --> 0:01:49.314
<v Speaker 2>I was at the top of a mountain and there

0:01:49.354 --> 0:01:51.354
<v Speaker 2>was a little like lock box where they keep the

0:01:51.394 --> 0:01:54.114
<v Speaker 2>green whistle, and when they looked in there, it hadn't

0:01:54.154 --> 0:01:56.714
<v Speaker 2>been replaced from last time. And in fact, in the

0:01:56.754 --> 0:02:00.194
<v Speaker 2>whole town there was no green whistle. It just didn't exist.

0:02:00.274 --> 0:02:03.114
<v Speaker 2>And so I thought about that green whistle for about

0:02:03.154 --> 0:02:04.154
<v Speaker 2>eight straight hours.

0:02:04.434 --> 0:02:05.954
<v Speaker 1>Okay, well, let me tell you it was the only

0:02:05.994 --> 0:02:07.874
<v Speaker 1>one in the room who's had a green whil experience.

0:02:08.353 --> 0:02:11.114
<v Speaker 1>That it is one of those things. I don't know

0:02:11.114 --> 0:02:13.714
<v Speaker 1>what drug it is, actually, but it's something that's given

0:02:13.714 --> 0:02:15.354
<v Speaker 1>to you in the moment. We have had like an

0:02:15.394 --> 0:02:17.754
<v Speaker 1>extreme pain incident broke your leg. For me, it was

0:02:17.794 --> 0:02:20.913
<v Speaker 1>I snapped my cruci at tendon. It's so that say,

0:02:20.914 --> 0:02:23.594
<v Speaker 1>paramedics can help you deal with the pain whilst they

0:02:23.754 --> 0:02:27.674
<v Speaker 1>transfer you to hospital. So it's short acting, it's very effective,

0:02:27.674 --> 0:02:30.074
<v Speaker 1>so it kicks in really quickly, and I'm not sure

0:02:30.114 --> 0:02:32.514
<v Speaker 1>if it's actually helping with the pain or just your

0:02:32.554 --> 0:02:35.754
<v Speaker 1>brain is now having super super fun and is distracted

0:02:35.834 --> 0:02:38.394
<v Speaker 1>and doesn't care about the pain anymore. Because I went

0:02:38.394 --> 0:02:41.434
<v Speaker 1>from like howling and crying to being like, oh, that's

0:02:41.514 --> 0:02:44.394
<v Speaker 1>a pretty cartoon on the ceiling of the cubicle that

0:02:44.434 --> 0:02:46.914
<v Speaker 1>they landed me in at the hospital. So it's really

0:02:46.954 --> 0:02:48.554
<v Speaker 1>short acting and very effective.

0:02:48.674 --> 0:02:52.274
<v Speaker 3>So it's like a preloaded it's got drugs in a whistle.

0:02:51.954 --> 0:02:53.874
<v Speaker 2>And you just kind of like breathe it in. And

0:02:53.914 --> 0:02:57.434
<v Speaker 2>so it's always like sideline of kids sports, that kind

0:02:57.434 --> 0:02:59.234
<v Speaker 2>of stuff. And I thought when I read this headline,

0:02:59.274 --> 0:03:02.554
<v Speaker 2>I was like, this is genius, because I've interviewed women

0:03:02.674 --> 0:03:05.634
<v Speaker 2>in the past who have said that they got NIUD

0:03:05.754 --> 0:03:08.794
<v Speaker 2>inserted and it was turn out of ten pain. They

0:03:09.034 --> 0:03:11.474
<v Speaker 2>fainted on the train on the way home. Others say

0:03:11.714 --> 0:03:14.714
<v Speaker 2>it was absolutely fine. But the fact that that hasn't

0:03:14.794 --> 0:03:18.874
<v Speaker 2>been part of the process or something that you're off it.

0:03:18.994 --> 0:03:20.954
<v Speaker 2>I've even thought it with I remember the most painful

0:03:20.994 --> 0:03:25.074
<v Speaker 2>part of my labor was the stretcher sweep thing that

0:03:25.114 --> 0:03:26.554
<v Speaker 2>they did, and I was like, can I have a

0:03:26.554 --> 0:03:28.274
<v Speaker 2>green whistle for that? Maybe not, I don't know. It

0:03:28.354 --> 0:03:30.314
<v Speaker 2>might not be good for the baby. But the fact

0:03:30.394 --> 0:03:34.954
<v Speaker 2>that pain relief isn't at the forefront of the practitioner's

0:03:34.994 --> 0:03:38.394
<v Speaker 2>mind when you are going inside someone to a very

0:03:38.434 --> 0:03:41.594
<v Speaker 2>tender area. I think this is very exciting progress.

0:03:42.914 --> 0:03:46.394
<v Speaker 1>Have either of you watched a single episode of All's

0:03:46.554 --> 0:03:47.154
<v Speaker 1>Fair yet?

0:03:47.674 --> 0:03:48.074
<v Speaker 3>Nope?

0:03:48.314 --> 0:03:51.594
<v Speaker 2>No, I have not, But I must say I'm finding

0:03:51.634 --> 0:03:55.754
<v Speaker 2>the reviews very tantalizing. And the more I read, the

0:03:55.754 --> 0:03:58.594
<v Speaker 2>more zero stars I see, the more I'm leaning.

0:03:58.474 --> 0:04:02.354
<v Speaker 1>Oh, guys, you're in for a treat. It is obviously

0:04:02.474 --> 0:04:05.434
<v Speaker 1>Kim Kardashian's lady feature into acting. She's done a few

0:04:05.434 --> 0:04:07.674
<v Speaker 1>gigs before, but this is her latest. It is not

0:04:07.754 --> 0:04:11.554
<v Speaker 1>getting the reviews that we'd perhaps thought when this idea

0:04:11.714 --> 0:04:15.514
<v Speaker 1>was being formed. But maybe it's a little more strategic

0:04:15.594 --> 0:04:19.514
<v Speaker 1>than we thought. But Kim's flop era, we believe may

0:04:19.553 --> 0:04:21.914
<v Speaker 1>have just arrived because she's not just failing where it

0:04:21.954 --> 0:04:25.073
<v Speaker 1>comes to this particular venture. She's also failed in her

0:04:25.154 --> 0:04:28.353
<v Speaker 1>legal career this week as well, so we think maybe

0:04:28.393 --> 0:04:30.433
<v Speaker 1>she's starting to learn a few lessons on this new

0:04:30.513 --> 0:04:35.993
<v Speaker 1>pathway to failure. I am a great connoisseur of terrible things.

0:04:36.154 --> 0:04:39.313
<v Speaker 1>So if someone tells me that something has a bad review,

0:04:39.594 --> 0:04:41.954
<v Speaker 1>I will often like it. And I think it's because

0:04:41.993 --> 0:04:44.433
<v Speaker 1>I have very low brow taste buds, Like I just

0:04:44.474 --> 0:04:47.313
<v Speaker 1>go into these things purely for entertainment value. And so

0:04:47.433 --> 0:04:49.753
<v Speaker 1>this if you are not across All's fair. This is

0:04:49.834 --> 0:04:53.193
<v Speaker 1>the new Ryan Murphy drama. It's about a women only

0:04:53.354 --> 0:04:58.833
<v Speaker 1>divorce lawyers firm, which stars Kim Kardashian, Naomi Watts, Nissi Nash.

0:04:58.953 --> 0:05:01.633
<v Speaker 1>They're like your core three divorce lawyers who've come from

0:05:01.633 --> 0:05:04.593
<v Speaker 1>like this past of you know, middle aged white man

0:05:04.674 --> 0:05:07.434
<v Speaker 1>law firms where they're overlooked and undervalued, and so they

0:05:07.474 --> 0:05:10.674
<v Speaker 1>come out as these powerful women and they drop these

0:05:10.714 --> 0:05:16.594
<v Speaker 1>one liners which are awful, and they deal with cheating

0:05:16.753 --> 0:05:20.753
<v Speaker 1>husbands and controlling men, and like they get the best

0:05:20.794 --> 0:05:23.753
<v Speaker 1>for these women their clients that have you know, been

0:05:23.873 --> 0:05:26.394
<v Speaker 1>very poorly treated. And I can tell you now I'm

0:05:26.433 --> 0:05:30.714
<v Speaker 1>three episodes in the acting is like beyond terrible. I

0:05:30.873 --> 0:05:31.594
<v Speaker 1>don't know.

0:05:31.674 --> 0:05:34.753
<v Speaker 3>Why Naomi Watts and Sarah Paulson, who's also in it

0:05:34.794 --> 0:05:37.073
<v Speaker 3>and has kind of write like Ryan Murphy's News, and

0:05:37.193 --> 0:05:37.833
<v Speaker 3>Glenn Close.

0:05:38.313 --> 0:05:39.993
<v Speaker 1>How can the oh my god, Glenn Close?

0:05:40.073 --> 0:05:40.273
<v Speaker 4>Yeah?

0:05:40.274 --> 0:05:43.474
<v Speaker 3>How can these people be acting badly? They're very good actors.

0:05:43.993 --> 0:05:45.873
<v Speaker 1>It has got to be in the writing. And I

0:05:45.953 --> 0:05:47.553
<v Speaker 1>was trying to find it. Who was in the writer's

0:05:47.633 --> 0:05:49.433
<v Speaker 1>room for this, And as far as I can tell,

0:05:49.433 --> 0:05:53.193
<v Speaker 1>there's not a single woman on the writing style so

0:05:53.674 --> 0:05:55.714
<v Speaker 1>interesting take. I mean, if there is and I've missed it,

0:05:55.794 --> 0:05:57.714
<v Speaker 1>I apologized, But as far as I can tell, there

0:05:57.753 --> 0:06:00.713
<v Speaker 1>was not many women writing this, And so the way

0:06:00.794 --> 0:06:03.313
<v Speaker 1>in which these women have come together, like the friendship

0:06:03.354 --> 0:06:05.713
<v Speaker 1>that's supposed to be like the all encompassing part of

0:06:05.753 --> 0:06:09.034
<v Speaker 1>the backstory of them, feels very forced and uncomfortable. They're

0:06:09.034 --> 0:06:11.354
<v Speaker 1>delivering these one liners like they should have impact, but

0:06:11.393 --> 0:06:14.153
<v Speaker 1>they just seem kind of funny. But the big part

0:06:14.193 --> 0:06:18.274
<v Speaker 1>of it, I think is just it is bougie and classless,

0:06:18.393 --> 0:06:21.794
<v Speaker 1>and there is designer threads and loads of bling and

0:06:21.834 --> 0:06:24.234
<v Speaker 1>it just taps into that part of my brain that

0:06:24.393 --> 0:06:27.393
<v Speaker 1>just loves and it's like going on a roller coaster

0:06:27.594 --> 0:06:30.234
<v Speaker 1>at you know movie world, like you know it's going

0:06:30.274 --> 0:06:31.873
<v Speaker 1>to be awful, bit at the same time, like you're

0:06:31.873 --> 0:06:33.914
<v Speaker 1>adrenaline is pumping and you really love it. Like that's

0:06:33.953 --> 0:06:36.594
<v Speaker 1>all I can say is keeping me coming back because

0:06:36.633 --> 0:06:38.313
<v Speaker 1>the flash in the Glitz is everything.

0:06:38.553 --> 0:06:40.833
<v Speaker 2>What I can't work out is that Kim Kardashian is

0:06:41.034 --> 0:06:46.794
<v Speaker 2>known for her blankness right like, even she is expressionless.

0:06:47.154 --> 0:06:50.234
<v Speaker 2>Her face doesn't really move, she doesn't have any pause,

0:06:50.914 --> 0:06:54.474
<v Speaker 2>she doesn't emote at all. So the pivot into acting

0:06:54.594 --> 0:06:57.113
<v Speaker 2>is a very interesting one for me. But I wanted

0:06:57.113 --> 0:06:59.633
<v Speaker 2>to ask you, Claire. I read this incredible review in

0:06:59.674 --> 0:07:01.474
<v Speaker 2>The Atlantic, and I want to read you a line

0:07:01.513 --> 0:07:02.873
<v Speaker 2>and then I want you to tell me if this

0:07:03.034 --> 0:07:05.153
<v Speaker 2>was your experience of watching it, because I think that

0:07:05.193 --> 0:07:09.154
<v Speaker 2>this also might signify a broad a cultural shift towards

0:07:09.674 --> 0:07:13.994
<v Speaker 2>a very dire place. The author, who is Sophie Gilbert, wrote,

0:07:14.274 --> 0:07:17.514
<v Speaker 2>I can't call it a television show because it isn't one. Rather,

0:07:17.594 --> 0:07:21.554
<v Speaker 2>it's Instagram reels. At episode length, forty five minute collections

0:07:21.594 --> 0:07:25.634
<v Speaker 2>of bedazzled moving images targeted at the idly scrolling second

0:07:25.674 --> 0:07:28.754
<v Speaker 2>screen viewer seems pass quickly, as if to emulate the

0:07:28.794 --> 0:07:31.874
<v Speaker 2>true feed experience. If you're not already on your phone,

0:07:31.914 --> 0:07:32.794
<v Speaker 2>you may as well be.

0:07:33.234 --> 0:07:35.514
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that seems pretty accurate, to be honest.

0:07:36.274 --> 0:07:39.274
<v Speaker 3>I did see one still from it which was Kim

0:07:39.393 --> 0:07:42.874
<v Speaker 3>wearing a sort of tweed skirt with a believe it's

0:07:42.914 --> 0:07:47.114
<v Speaker 3>called a whale tail, a visible G string poking.

0:07:46.714 --> 0:07:47.434
<v Speaker 1>Out the back.

0:07:47.794 --> 0:07:50.034
<v Speaker 3>I mean, look, I'm not a lawyer, but is that

0:07:50.354 --> 0:07:52.033
<v Speaker 3>to actually wear that to court?

0:07:52.434 --> 0:07:55.594
<v Speaker 1>This show, well, let me just prefers. I'm three episodes

0:07:55.594 --> 0:07:57.554
<v Speaker 1>in and they have yet to go to court. This

0:07:57.594 --> 0:08:00.554
<v Speaker 1>is all boardroom experiences at this point. So this is

0:08:00.634 --> 0:08:03.834
<v Speaker 1>like husband and wife sitting down across the table, very combative,

0:08:04.194 --> 0:08:06.153
<v Speaker 1>like they often come in with a bunch of men

0:08:06.194 --> 0:08:08.474
<v Speaker 1>and they sit down and they say things like oh,

0:08:08.874 --> 0:08:11.713
<v Speaker 1>all the ladies together, like that kind of vibe, and

0:08:11.714 --> 0:08:13.554
<v Speaker 1>then the ladies are like and we are going to

0:08:13.634 --> 0:08:16.394
<v Speaker 1>destroy you, and you're like, yes, girl, go get them.

0:08:16.434 --> 0:08:18.914
<v Speaker 1>And then they deliver these like terrible lines and you're

0:08:18.953 --> 0:08:22.274
<v Speaker 1>like cool, you still want like are really happy for

0:08:22.314 --> 0:08:26.114
<v Speaker 1>your client, but like these storylines are wrapped up in milliseconds.

0:08:26.154 --> 0:08:29.033
<v Speaker 1>You barely get to know the clients. Like Jessica Simpson

0:08:29.114 --> 0:08:33.754
<v Speaker 1>is a client and her role is like exceptional, like exceptional.

0:08:33.154 --> 0:08:36.234
<v Speaker 3>What do you mean by exceptional like she's a great actor.

0:08:36.634 --> 0:08:38.714
<v Speaker 1>No, no, no, nothing to do with her acting experience.

0:08:38.994 --> 0:08:40.634
<v Speaker 1>It is the fact that they brought her in to

0:08:40.714 --> 0:08:42.954
<v Speaker 1>play the character that they have and it kind of

0:08:42.994 --> 0:08:47.714
<v Speaker 1>plays very much into her real life plastic surgery experiences.

0:08:48.114 --> 0:08:50.154
<v Speaker 1>It's just great. And also Glenn Close, like, you cannot

0:08:50.154 --> 0:08:52.554
<v Speaker 1>fault this woman. She's incredible. And she delivers a line

0:08:52.594 --> 0:08:55.074
<v Speaker 1>to Sarah Paulson's character where she says, like the world

0:08:55.074 --> 0:08:57.354
<v Speaker 1>would be so much happier if your mother just swallowed

0:08:57.554 --> 0:09:01.514
<v Speaker 1>And that coming out of Len Close's mouth is like, whoa,

0:09:01.554 --> 0:09:06.514
<v Speaker 1>it's camp and it's terrible, Like it's just awful, awful, terrible.

0:09:06.554 --> 0:09:09.594
<v Speaker 1>But this is from Kim Kardashian American Horror Story because

0:09:09.594 --> 0:09:11.634
<v Speaker 1>she got Rave reviews for that, all right.

0:09:11.634 --> 0:09:14.994
<v Speaker 2>Because I have two theories as to why this has happened,

0:09:14.994 --> 0:09:17.954
<v Speaker 2>because I don't believe in twenty twenty five we are accidentally,

0:09:18.154 --> 0:09:22.154
<v Speaker 2>especially with Ryan Murphy who created Glee, like he is

0:09:22.434 --> 0:09:25.954
<v Speaker 2>a very incredible creator who knows what he's doing, I

0:09:25.994 --> 0:09:29.154
<v Speaker 2>don't believe that this happened by accident. Right, So the

0:09:29.194 --> 0:09:31.954
<v Speaker 2>first theory is one I've seen going around on substack,

0:09:32.114 --> 0:09:36.713
<v Speaker 2>which is Basically, the zero percent rating on Rotten Tomatoes

0:09:36.914 --> 0:09:40.034
<v Speaker 2>is a plant, and it's there on purpose because there

0:09:40.114 --> 0:09:42.594
<v Speaker 2>is nothing that makes you want to watch a show

0:09:42.674 --> 0:09:46.314
<v Speaker 2>more than the thought is it really that bad? Like

0:09:46.794 --> 0:09:48.714
<v Speaker 2>I want to go and prove for myself that this

0:09:48.914 --> 0:09:51.514
<v Speaker 2>is the worst show ever, And that's been part of

0:09:51.554 --> 0:09:56.834
<v Speaker 2>the attraction, and early indications suggests that people are flocking.

0:09:57.394 --> 0:10:02.874
<v Speaker 2>The second thing is that there are seventeen executive producers

0:10:02.874 --> 0:10:06.554
<v Speaker 2>on this show. They're used to it's wild, right, including

0:10:06.554 --> 0:10:09.354
<v Speaker 2>pretty much all of the actors. So you've got what's

0:10:09.514 --> 0:10:13.234
<v Speaker 2>is one? I think Kardashian is one, Paulhan is one,

0:10:13.674 --> 0:10:17.154
<v Speaker 2>And what that means is like decades ago, you'd have

0:10:17.194 --> 0:10:19.794
<v Speaker 2>three or four, So the room of people making decisions

0:10:19.834 --> 0:10:20.674
<v Speaker 2>is quite small.

0:10:20.954 --> 0:10:21.114
<v Speaker 3>Now.

0:10:21.154 --> 0:10:24.074
<v Speaker 2>It's like this flex that every actor sort of wants

0:10:24.114 --> 0:10:27.834
<v Speaker 2>to be an EP as well. And I think we're

0:10:27.874 --> 0:10:31.434
<v Speaker 2>starting to create these vanilla Frankenstein's like where we've got

0:10:31.474 --> 0:10:36.034
<v Speaker 2>too much input that it then just dilutes an idea

0:10:36.234 --> 0:10:40.234
<v Speaker 2>and becomes absolute garbage the next show you're watching. Have

0:10:40.314 --> 0:10:44.474
<v Speaker 2>a look at how many people had creative input, and

0:10:44.514 --> 0:10:47.994
<v Speaker 2>there is a threshold at which there is just too much,

0:10:48.034 --> 0:10:50.554
<v Speaker 2>Like did Kim Kardashian need a seat at the table

0:10:51.114 --> 0:10:51.514
<v Speaker 2>like that.

0:10:51.634 --> 0:10:53.634
<v Speaker 3>I think you're onto something there because and just like

0:10:53.674 --> 0:10:57.274
<v Speaker 3>that had the same issue. It did too the actors

0:10:57.314 --> 0:11:00.874
<v Speaker 3>were executive producers and Rotten Tomatos. For some time now,

0:11:00.914 --> 0:11:03.434
<v Speaker 3>people have been talking about the fact that because it's

0:11:03.514 --> 0:11:06.754
<v Speaker 3>so important, it is getting gained. Yeah, and I don't

0:11:06.754 --> 0:11:09.154
<v Speaker 3>know if you remember this, but about a year ago

0:11:09.394 --> 0:11:12.474
<v Speaker 3>it came out that Paddington iiO had the highest Rotten

0:11:12.474 --> 0:11:16.514
<v Speaker 3>Tomatoes rating of any movie ever, higher than Citizen Kane,

0:11:16.514 --> 0:11:20.634
<v Speaker 3>which is often regarded as the cinematic masterpiece of the

0:11:20.674 --> 0:11:23.714
<v Speaker 3>twentieth century. And you just got to wonder about any

0:11:23.834 --> 0:11:25.994
<v Speaker 3>rating system. I mean, look, I think Paddington Too is

0:11:26.034 --> 0:11:29.074
<v Speaker 3>delightful and Hugh Grant is as usual stealing the show.

0:11:29.194 --> 0:11:31.674
<v Speaker 3>But I just wonder if Paddington two really is the

0:11:31.714 --> 0:11:32.794
<v Speaker 3>best movie of all time.

0:11:33.034 --> 0:11:35.314
<v Speaker 1>So, as I mentioned, well, this is Kim's big fail

0:11:35.434 --> 0:11:39.794
<v Speaker 1>of the moment, but just quietly she failed again this

0:11:39.874 --> 0:11:44.474
<v Speaker 1>week because she didn't pass the bar. And anyone who's

0:11:44.474 --> 0:11:46.794
<v Speaker 1>been watching the Kardashians nose that, like this has been

0:11:46.834 --> 0:11:49.194
<v Speaker 1>a big theme throughout all of the seasons, and she's

0:11:49.234 --> 0:11:52.074
<v Speaker 1>been studying very hard, and she's been working advocating for

0:11:52.154 --> 0:11:56.034
<v Speaker 1>people in prison, and she failed the bar. So this

0:11:56.114 --> 0:11:59.314
<v Speaker 1>feels like Kim Kardashian is failing. In her personal life.

0:11:59.434 --> 0:12:01.994
<v Speaker 1>She's failing. I mean, she can't control the men that

0:12:02.074 --> 0:12:03.914
<v Speaker 1>come into her sphere, so I guess that's out of

0:12:03.914 --> 0:12:06.634
<v Speaker 1>her control. But career wise, like her actual career as

0:12:06.634 --> 0:12:10.394
<v Speaker 1>a lawyer is failing. Her alternate career as an actress,

0:12:10.754 --> 0:12:15.314
<v Speaker 1>she is failing. Are we now witnessing Kim Kardashian's flop era?

0:12:15.434 --> 0:12:17.474
<v Speaker 1>And what can she learn from all of this? We think?

0:12:17.474 --> 0:12:19.874
<v Speaker 1>I mean, she's fine. I love this for her.

0:12:19.994 --> 0:12:23.394
<v Speaker 3>I think this is why she is still just as

0:12:23.434 --> 0:12:26.914
<v Speaker 3>relevant today as she was ten years ago, fifteen years ago.

0:12:26.954 --> 0:12:31.154
<v Speaker 3>It's because she is willing to keep reinventing herself and

0:12:31.314 --> 0:12:34.674
<v Speaker 3>taking risks, and she's failed lots of times. Like I'm

0:12:34.674 --> 0:12:37.634
<v Speaker 3>thinking back to her skincare line that she tried to

0:12:37.714 --> 0:12:39.754
<v Speaker 3>launch a couple of times that never took off, and

0:12:39.834 --> 0:12:42.794
<v Speaker 3>it should have. Skims took off because she got really

0:12:42.834 --> 0:12:45.394
<v Speaker 3>smart people around her and she knew exactly what moment

0:12:45.474 --> 0:12:48.474
<v Speaker 3>she was in. But I love her failing the California Bar.

0:12:48.634 --> 0:12:50.994
<v Speaker 3>Isn't this the second or third time that she's failed?

0:12:51.034 --> 0:12:53.314
<v Speaker 1>At this point, I don't know which bar she's failed,

0:12:53.314 --> 0:12:56.314
<v Speaker 1>becausemember she failed the baby bar last time, and whether

0:12:56.354 --> 0:12:58.554
<v Speaker 1>this is the full fledged one or a retake of

0:12:58.554 --> 0:13:00.834
<v Speaker 1>the baby bar, I'm not sure, but yeah, she has.

0:13:00.754 --> 0:13:03.274
<v Speaker 2>Failed before, so I believe that she has now passed

0:13:03.274 --> 0:13:05.354
<v Speaker 2>the baby bar, but that it was the last time

0:13:05.434 --> 0:13:08.194
<v Speaker 2>she could possibly do it the time that she passed,

0:13:08.194 --> 0:13:10.314
<v Speaker 2>and then she studied really hard with this. She did

0:13:10.314 --> 0:13:12.754
<v Speaker 2>say she relied heavily on chat GPT and she has

0:13:12.794 --> 0:13:15.714
<v Speaker 2>some firm words for chat GPT. She says that sometimes

0:13:15.754 --> 0:13:18.754
<v Speaker 2>it's more like a go girl, believe in yourself, and

0:13:18.754 --> 0:13:21.714
<v Speaker 2>she's like, I just need the answer, which yes, I agree,

0:13:21.994 --> 0:13:24.674
<v Speaker 2>But I think she has entered her flop era. Kim

0:13:24.754 --> 0:13:28.314
<v Speaker 2>Kardashian is nothing if not self aware, and that is

0:13:28.314 --> 0:13:31.874
<v Speaker 2>her superpower. So even her caption on Instagram about the

0:13:31.874 --> 0:13:35.514
<v Speaker 2>All Fairs All's Fair thing, which was like, have you

0:13:35.554 --> 0:13:39.194
<v Speaker 2>guys watched the critically acclaimed All's Fair yet? Like she

0:13:39.434 --> 0:13:43.354
<v Speaker 2>thought that was funny that it was bad and she

0:13:43.554 --> 0:13:45.874
<v Speaker 2>posted about failing. She didn't have to post that she

0:13:45.954 --> 0:13:50.314
<v Speaker 2>failed that exam. But I mean, we all enter flop eras,

0:13:50.634 --> 0:13:53.274
<v Speaker 2>we've got to own them. There is humor in them,

0:13:53.634 --> 0:13:55.593
<v Speaker 2>and all power to Kim Kardashian.

0:13:55.834 --> 0:13:58.274
<v Speaker 1>I think this is amazing because I've had these conversations

0:13:58.274 --> 0:14:00.874
<v Speaker 1>with my daughter very recently, because when I pick her

0:14:00.914 --> 0:14:02.554
<v Speaker 1>up from school, I'd ask her about, you know, tell

0:14:02.594 --> 0:14:04.674
<v Speaker 1>me one thing that happened today, what did you succeed

0:14:04.714 --> 0:14:06.833
<v Speaker 1>at today? And We've had these kind of conversations, and

0:14:06.874 --> 0:14:09.074
<v Speaker 1>then one day I just asked her, did you fail

0:14:09.114 --> 0:14:12.554
<v Speaker 1>at anything today? And she was like, oh, I don't know.

0:14:12.714 --> 0:14:14.634
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to think about that. And then I

0:14:14.674 --> 0:14:16.554
<v Speaker 1>was like, but we learn from that, Like if you

0:14:16.594 --> 0:14:19.314
<v Speaker 1>fail at something, you learn some really big lessons from failing.

0:14:19.354 --> 0:14:22.114
<v Speaker 1>And she was like, oh, And now we have conversations

0:14:22.154 --> 0:14:25.154
<v Speaker 1>about successes and failures, so that as she grows up,

0:14:25.154 --> 0:14:26.874
<v Speaker 1>she's going to be like, Okay, what did I learn

0:14:26.954 --> 0:14:29.074
<v Speaker 1>from that fail rather than oh my god, I failed.

0:14:29.114 --> 0:14:31.394
<v Speaker 1>I'm the worst human in the world, and now I

0:14:31.394 --> 0:14:33.474
<v Speaker 1>can never do that again because I've failed at it

0:14:33.514 --> 0:14:36.434
<v Speaker 1>and I must be terrible. I love talking about failure,

0:14:36.634 --> 0:14:38.154
<v Speaker 1>and I'm like you, Amelia. I think this is a

0:14:38.194 --> 0:14:40.914
<v Speaker 1>really great moment for her because she's embracing it, she

0:14:40.994 --> 0:14:44.074
<v Speaker 1>learns from it, she keeps moving forward, she keeps trying,

0:14:44.314 --> 0:14:46.554
<v Speaker 1>she does things that gets her out of her comfort zone.

0:14:46.714 --> 0:14:50.314
<v Speaker 1>She does something new and different and incredible, and then sure,

0:14:50.394 --> 0:14:52.994
<v Speaker 1>sometimes it succeeds and sometimes it fails. But she's not

0:14:53.154 --> 0:14:56.234
<v Speaker 1>just hanging off of the Kardashian success for the rest

0:14:56.274 --> 0:14:58.674
<v Speaker 1>of her life. It's really quite interesting this time of

0:14:58.674 --> 0:14:59.314
<v Speaker 1>her life.

0:14:59.394 --> 0:15:03.194
<v Speaker 3>I've got another little tidbit of gossip related to the Kardashians,

0:15:03.314 --> 0:15:06.874
<v Speaker 3>and it's about Chris Jenner, who's not failing at anything

0:15:07.194 --> 0:15:07.594
<v Speaker 3>right now.

0:15:07.714 --> 0:15:10.914
<v Speaker 1>She is in whatever the opposite of a floppy era is.

0:15:10.954 --> 0:15:13.754
<v Speaker 3>She's got her brand new face that has been critically acclaimed,

0:15:13.874 --> 0:15:17.634
<v Speaker 3>unlike Kim Show. And she just celebrated her seventieth birthday

0:15:17.754 --> 0:15:20.834
<v Speaker 3>on Friday night in Los Angeles in Beverly Hills at

0:15:20.874 --> 0:15:25.634
<v Speaker 3>Jeff Bezos's mansion, and the guest list was very impressive.

0:15:25.874 --> 0:15:30.394
<v Speaker 3>It was everyone from Mark Zuckerberg to Oprah and Gail

0:15:30.674 --> 0:15:34.034
<v Speaker 3>to Rita Wilson. Tom Hanks's wife is also an actress

0:15:34.074 --> 0:15:37.674
<v Speaker 3>in her own right, to Miranda Kerr and the Snapchat

0:15:37.754 --> 0:15:39.034
<v Speaker 3>guy she's married.

0:15:38.674 --> 0:15:40.674
<v Speaker 1>To, Evan Adele, was there.

0:15:40.794 --> 0:15:44.714
<v Speaker 3>Interestingly, she covered her face with her handbag on the

0:15:44.754 --> 0:15:48.314
<v Speaker 3>way in, which reminded me of remember when Leonardo DiCaprio

0:15:48.394 --> 0:15:50.554
<v Speaker 3>went to the Bezel's wedding and just pulled his hat

0:15:50.634 --> 0:15:50.874
<v Speaker 3>down on.

0:15:51.674 --> 0:15:53.914
<v Speaker 2>I would absolutely go to christ Janna's seventieth and I

0:15:53.954 --> 0:15:56.154
<v Speaker 2>would absolutely hide my face on my way in and

0:15:56.194 --> 0:15:58.234
<v Speaker 2>out because I think the out louders would be, you know,

0:15:58.394 --> 0:16:00.554
<v Speaker 2>probably call me out fairly, but I'd be like, guys,

0:16:00.594 --> 0:16:01.434
<v Speaker 2>I'm there for the gossip.

0:16:01.874 --> 0:16:04.634
<v Speaker 3>But what I found really interesting about this is that

0:16:05.354 --> 0:16:08.834
<v Speaker 3>Chris Jenna was not always Hollywood royalty. In fact, she

0:16:09.114 --> 0:16:12.074
<v Speaker 3>was on the outs in Hollywood all through the twenty tens.

0:16:12.114 --> 0:16:15.674
<v Speaker 3>The Kardashian family was seen as very naff, sort of embarrassing.

0:16:15.994 --> 0:16:18.954
<v Speaker 3>They certainly didn't have any credibility in the sort of

0:16:19.034 --> 0:16:22.834
<v Speaker 3>moneyed halls of Beverly Hills. And now Chris Jenna seems

0:16:22.874 --> 0:16:25.794
<v Speaker 3>to be the queen of Hollywood, and she's bringing together

0:16:25.914 --> 0:16:28.554
<v Speaker 3>not just actors like the Riata Wilson's of the world,

0:16:28.594 --> 0:16:31.474
<v Speaker 3>but also like media moguls like Oprah and then tech

0:16:31.554 --> 0:16:35.194
<v Speaker 3>moguls like Mark Zuckerberg and Jeff Bezos. And my genuine

0:16:35.234 --> 0:16:38.434
<v Speaker 3>question is, how did she pull this off? And why

0:16:38.594 --> 0:16:41.554
<v Speaker 3>does everyone feel that they need to be there at

0:16:41.594 --> 0:16:42.954
<v Speaker 3>Chris Jenna's birthday party?

0:16:43.074 --> 0:16:46.714
<v Speaker 2>I reckon behind the scenes. She must be an incredible networker, right,

0:16:46.834 --> 0:16:48.874
<v Speaker 2>Like she must be one of those people that everyone

0:16:49.114 --> 0:16:52.754
<v Speaker 2>actually quite likes. This happens in like Australian media circles,

0:16:52.754 --> 0:16:55.154
<v Speaker 2>where it's not who you'd expect who were like the

0:16:55.194 --> 0:16:58.954
<v Speaker 2>most connected and almost the most popular. Did I read

0:16:58.994 --> 0:17:01.994
<v Speaker 2>though that Chris Jenna had Harry and Meghan Harry the.

0:17:02.034 --> 0:17:04.554
<v Speaker 3>Duke and Duchess of Sussex were there. But I want

0:17:04.554 --> 0:17:07.794
<v Speaker 3>to just push you on that, Jesse, because we knew

0:17:07.834 --> 0:17:09.554
<v Speaker 3>there were friends, by the way, because Megan had sent

0:17:09.634 --> 0:17:12.634
<v Speaker 3>her Rose when she launched her Rose, so that's when

0:17:12.754 --> 0:17:16.594
<v Speaker 3>that connection first came about. But I want to distinguish

0:17:16.594 --> 0:17:19.114
<v Speaker 3>between someone who's a good networker and someone who's just

0:17:19.154 --> 0:17:21.154
<v Speaker 3>a lot of fun to be around, because that's what

0:17:21.194 --> 0:17:23.314
<v Speaker 3>I'm trying to figure out with her. Do people think

0:17:23.314 --> 0:17:25.714
<v Speaker 3>it's strategic to show up at her party or is

0:17:25.714 --> 0:17:28.394
<v Speaker 3>she just the best fun in Hollywood? Oh?

0:17:28.434 --> 0:17:30.354
<v Speaker 1>I think she might be really fun. I think she

0:17:30.434 --> 0:17:32.593
<v Speaker 1>might be really fun too. But I also feel like

0:17:32.914 --> 0:17:37.674
<v Speaker 1>the Kardashian power has shifted over the years. Remember when

0:17:37.994 --> 0:17:40.513
<v Speaker 1>their power was kind of intangible, like they were famous

0:17:40.514 --> 0:17:42.313
<v Speaker 1>for being famous. There was all of that, and I

0:17:42.314 --> 0:17:45.834
<v Speaker 1>think as we've kind of progressed, and these women have

0:17:45.914 --> 0:17:50.034
<v Speaker 1>become incredibly successful business women in their own right, and

0:17:50.314 --> 0:17:52.194
<v Speaker 1>you know, Chris still at the head of that family

0:17:52.194 --> 0:17:54.834
<v Speaker 1>as their agent and taking care of business, and her

0:17:54.874 --> 0:17:57.754
<v Speaker 1>influence has grown and grown and grown, and I think

0:17:58.154 --> 0:17:59.714
<v Speaker 1>just the nature of the world that we now live

0:17:59.714 --> 0:18:02.313
<v Speaker 1>in that's less about the old money and about the

0:18:02.354 --> 0:18:04.834
<v Speaker 1>old ways and more about the you and the flashy

0:18:04.874 --> 0:18:07.674
<v Speaker 1>and the next and the latest. I think her power

0:18:07.754 --> 0:18:09.714
<v Speaker 1>is actually shifted into a place where I think people

0:18:09.994 --> 0:18:12.794
<v Speaker 1>probably are also networking with her in a way that

0:18:12.794 --> 0:18:15.154
<v Speaker 1>they wouldn't have done ten years ago. I have a

0:18:15.154 --> 0:18:19.034
<v Speaker 1>little piece of gossip about Jeff Bezos. He has a house.

0:18:18.834 --> 0:18:21.394
<v Speaker 3>In Washington, DC, where I used to live, and I

0:18:21.474 --> 0:18:23.834
<v Speaker 3>have a friend who once went to a party at

0:18:23.834 --> 0:18:25.273
<v Speaker 3>his Washington DC mansion.

0:18:25.434 --> 0:18:26.794
<v Speaker 1>And here is the little tidbit.

0:18:27.274 --> 0:18:30.194
<v Speaker 3>He owns two mansions and they're on other sides of

0:18:30.234 --> 0:18:32.194
<v Speaker 3>the street from each other there, and one of the

0:18:32.234 --> 0:18:35.114
<v Speaker 3>mansions is just for parties, and it's full of like

0:18:35.274 --> 0:18:39.594
<v Speaker 3>really historic, pricey memorabilia and beautiful frange pictures and it's

0:18:39.634 --> 0:18:43.074
<v Speaker 3>specifically designed to entertain people and impress people. And then

0:18:43.114 --> 0:18:44.914
<v Speaker 3>on the other side of the Street is his actual

0:18:44.914 --> 0:18:46.794
<v Speaker 3>house that he lives in, And what's the bet that

0:18:46.794 --> 0:18:50.634
<v Speaker 3>that's just got some comfy sofas and some oh some

0:18:50.674 --> 0:18:53.794
<v Speaker 3>big big screen TVs. And I just love the idea

0:18:53.834 --> 0:18:56.394
<v Speaker 3>of a dedicated party house for Jeff Bezos.

0:18:56.874 --> 0:19:00.154
<v Speaker 2>After the break, the New York Times asked a very

0:19:00.154 --> 0:19:02.634
<v Speaker 2>simple question, nothing wrong with asking a question. They just

0:19:02.634 --> 0:19:06.714
<v Speaker 2>wanted to know if women ruined the workplace? And the

0:19:06.714 --> 0:19:09.674
<v Speaker 2>internet got really mad, and we are here to dissect it.

0:19:15.634 --> 0:19:20.154
<v Speaker 2>Did women ruin the workplace? The New York Times? They did,

0:19:20.194 --> 0:19:22.674
<v Speaker 2>and they took the words right out of our mouths.

0:19:23.274 --> 0:19:26.474
<v Speaker 2>They are reading our minds. Last week, the New York

0:19:26.474 --> 0:19:29.994
<v Speaker 2>Times published that headline, and as tends to happen on

0:19:30.034 --> 0:19:33.394
<v Speaker 2>the internet, there was a lot of blowback to the headline.

0:19:33.474 --> 0:19:37.114
<v Speaker 2>I think most people didn't actually read what was beyond it.

0:19:37.154 --> 0:19:40.634
<v Speaker 2>That's not to say the headline isn't offensive or problematic,

0:19:40.994 --> 0:19:46.794
<v Speaker 2>but the article itself was somewhat more complicated, and we'll

0:19:46.874 --> 0:19:47.353
<v Speaker 2>get to that.

0:19:47.514 --> 0:19:48.954
<v Speaker 1>They also changed the headline.

0:19:49.074 --> 0:19:51.674
<v Speaker 2>Oh, they changed the headline like six times.

0:19:51.714 --> 0:19:54.594
<v Speaker 3>So it did start off as did women ruin the Workplace?

0:19:54.634 --> 0:19:57.434
<v Speaker 3>And people were upset, they said, we've heard you. They

0:19:57.594 --> 0:20:01.513
<v Speaker 3>changed it to did liberal feminism ruin the workplace?

0:20:01.714 --> 0:20:04.434
<v Speaker 2>Yes, they kept trying to kind of hedge hedge hedge,

0:20:04.434 --> 0:20:06.674
<v Speaker 2>and you could just hear the panic in the newsroom,

0:20:06.754 --> 0:20:11.994
<v Speaker 2>which a it's quite enjoying. Host Ross Douthat interviewed two

0:20:12.114 --> 0:20:16.314
<v Speaker 2>conservative female writers. One is named Helen Andrews, the other

0:20:16.554 --> 0:20:21.114
<v Speaker 2>is Leah Libresco Sergeant, and they make two very different points,

0:20:21.114 --> 0:20:23.834
<v Speaker 2>but he sits down with them and basically they all

0:20:23.914 --> 0:20:28.674
<v Speaker 2>explore the idea that workplaces have become more woke, and

0:20:28.874 --> 0:20:33.874
<v Speaker 2>wokism is of course a result of the feminization of

0:20:34.234 --> 0:20:37.954
<v Speaker 2>the workplace. So apparently women they care more about this

0:20:38.034 --> 0:20:43.394
<v Speaker 2>equality bullshit. They are more driven by empathy, social justice, priorities,

0:20:43.714 --> 0:20:45.593
<v Speaker 2>consensus over decision making.

0:20:45.994 --> 0:20:47.474
<v Speaker 1>God, we're awful, I know.

0:20:47.714 --> 0:20:50.794
<v Speaker 2>And this shift has meant that we have lost important

0:20:50.794 --> 0:20:54.634
<v Speaker 2>things like hierarchy, assertiveness, and risk taking, which are all

0:20:54.754 --> 0:20:59.914
<v Speaker 2>essential to a thriving workplace. Helen Andrews says that feminine

0:21:00.034 --> 0:21:04.033
<v Speaker 2>vices such as gossip and an inability to deal with

0:21:04.074 --> 0:21:06.834
<v Speaker 2>conflict directly have led to very corrosive things like the

0:21:06.874 --> 0:21:07.714
<v Speaker 2>meter movement.

0:21:07.834 --> 0:21:09.074
<v Speaker 3>Don't get her started on.

0:21:08.994 --> 0:21:13.833
<v Speaker 2>The TV show All's Fair, while in fact, can we

0:21:13.874 --> 0:21:17.034
<v Speaker 2>pin that on men? Because men wrote that they delivered

0:21:17.034 --> 0:21:19.553
<v Speaker 2>the scripts the poor women, which I feel like is

0:21:19.554 --> 0:21:21.474
<v Speaker 2>actually kind of a metaphor for what's going on here.

0:21:21.554 --> 0:21:25.354
<v Speaker 2>But before we go to did women ruin the workplace?

0:21:25.394 --> 0:21:28.434
<v Speaker 2>I want to explore the idea of did women in

0:21:28.554 --> 0:21:31.594
<v Speaker 2>fairness change the workplace? What do you reckon?

0:21:32.034 --> 0:21:34.834
<v Speaker 1>I mean, of course they did, moving from this notion

0:21:34.874 --> 0:21:37.434
<v Speaker 1>that a man's only role in this world is to

0:21:37.514 --> 0:21:40.714
<v Speaker 1>go to work and make money and come home. This

0:21:40.994 --> 0:21:43.674
<v Speaker 1>is an opportunity that I feel men have maybe let

0:21:43.714 --> 0:21:46.474
<v Speaker 1>them pass by, but inviting women into the workplace freed

0:21:46.514 --> 0:21:49.954
<v Speaker 1>them up to have more life than breadwinner. And when

0:21:49.994 --> 0:21:53.514
<v Speaker 1>women came in it of course introduced things like maternity

0:21:53.554 --> 0:21:59.714
<v Speaker 1>leave initiatives. It also created things like workplace discrimination legislation

0:21:59.874 --> 0:22:03.994
<v Speaker 1>came on board, so things definitely changed when women came

0:22:03.994 --> 0:22:06.474
<v Speaker 1>into the workforce. But like I said, men lost an

0:22:06.474 --> 0:22:09.634
<v Speaker 1>opportunity to pull back from the workforce, to not have

0:22:09.714 --> 0:22:11.994
<v Speaker 1>that be their entire identity. And I think this is

0:22:12.034 --> 0:22:15.474
<v Speaker 1>where we're failing men in particular, as no one taught

0:22:15.474 --> 0:22:17.874
<v Speaker 1>them what to do once they weren't the only ones

0:22:17.954 --> 0:22:21.154
<v Speaker 1>doing that important role, and they've kind of been left

0:22:21.874 --> 0:22:24.754
<v Speaker 1>wondering what their purpose is in life now because they

0:22:24.834 --> 0:22:26.954
<v Speaker 1>did not take the on id to say this. Conservative

0:22:26.994 --> 0:22:30.434
<v Speaker 1>men in particular didn't take the opportunity to explore becoming

0:22:30.514 --> 0:22:33.954
<v Speaker 1>better and more involved fathers, or finding ways to better

0:22:33.954 --> 0:22:37.394
<v Speaker 1>their society and community, or you know, looking beyond their

0:22:37.394 --> 0:22:39.874
<v Speaker 1>worth as a dollar sign. Like it's a really interesting

0:22:40.474 --> 0:22:45.073
<v Speaker 1>moment where we could have collectively made everyone's lives different

0:22:45.114 --> 0:22:49.314
<v Speaker 1>and more interesting, and instead, conservative men in particular chose

0:22:49.354 --> 0:22:50.074
<v Speaker 1>to stand still.

0:22:50.354 --> 0:22:52.754
<v Speaker 2>All right, I'm going to play Devil's advocate here because

0:22:52.794 --> 0:22:56.434
<v Speaker 2>I would be lying if I didn't confess that I

0:22:56.474 --> 0:23:00.034
<v Speaker 2>have sat with lots of people who are very high

0:23:00.114 --> 0:23:03.234
<v Speaker 2>up in businesses, who work across lots and lots of

0:23:03.234 --> 0:23:06.354
<v Speaker 2>different industries, young people, older people, lots of different people

0:23:06.514 --> 0:23:11.554
<v Speaker 2>who have said some version of this right when they're

0:23:11.594 --> 0:23:13.994
<v Speaker 2>in private. So they will say something like women are

0:23:13.994 --> 0:23:17.514
<v Speaker 2>harder to manage workplaces with more women are bit here

0:23:18.154 --> 0:23:22.594
<v Speaker 2>they will say women are conflict avoidant, And so what

0:23:22.674 --> 0:23:24.354
<v Speaker 2>you get is a lot of they're not honest with

0:23:24.434 --> 0:23:27.553
<v Speaker 2>each other. We are finding that a lot of this

0:23:27.714 --> 0:23:30.513
<v Speaker 2>social justice stuff is impacting our bottom line. I'm not

0:23:30.554 --> 0:23:33.714
<v Speaker 2>saying I agree with any of this, but like, if

0:23:33.754 --> 0:23:37.033
<v Speaker 2>this is a conversation that is happening, and people are

0:23:37.034 --> 0:23:39.874
<v Speaker 2>going the workplace is changing. And that's the thing is

0:23:39.914 --> 0:23:42.394
<v Speaker 2>that once you get women in, even when the subject

0:23:42.434 --> 0:23:45.914
<v Speaker 2>of minorities, it's like yeah, and those people are going

0:23:45.994 --> 0:23:48.674
<v Speaker 2>to change a workplace. That's also why we want to

0:23:48.754 --> 0:23:52.754
<v Speaker 2>diversify and have a more inclusive workplace. But is that

0:23:52.874 --> 0:23:56.513
<v Speaker 2>worth discussing. I mean, if that is a true phenomenon, yeah, Look.

0:23:56.354 --> 0:23:58.234
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to piggyback on that and say I was

0:23:58.234 --> 0:24:01.154
<v Speaker 3>really interested to listen to this conversation because Helen Andrews

0:24:01.194 --> 0:24:04.474
<v Speaker 3>starts from an accurate place. The place she starts from

0:24:04.714 --> 0:24:07.074
<v Speaker 3>is that we are losing trust in all these affe

0:24:07.114 --> 0:24:11.273
<v Speaker 3>authority figures and institutions that we used to believe and trust.

0:24:11.594 --> 0:24:14.273
<v Speaker 3>So I'd think of government, I'd think of yes, media,

0:24:14.714 --> 0:24:17.194
<v Speaker 3>I think of churches, I'd think of all sorts of

0:24:17.274 --> 0:24:20.914
<v Speaker 3>institutions that are failing us now because we don't trust

0:24:20.914 --> 0:24:23.434
<v Speaker 3>them like we used to. And so her question is why,

0:24:23.914 --> 0:24:27.234
<v Speaker 3>and her answer happens to be women. And you know,

0:24:27.594 --> 0:24:29.674
<v Speaker 3>I think that's what we're spending time unpacking here. But

0:24:29.754 --> 0:24:32.754
<v Speaker 3>it's a reasonable question to ask why did institutions start

0:24:32.794 --> 0:24:35.754
<v Speaker 3>to fail us? And her basic point is that women

0:24:35.874 --> 0:24:40.114
<v Speaker 3>care more about relationships than men, and men care more

0:24:40.154 --> 0:24:44.474
<v Speaker 3>about rules than women do. That's the sort of premise

0:24:44.554 --> 0:24:47.354
<v Speaker 3>of what she's saying here. And I think it's very

0:24:47.394 --> 0:24:51.073
<v Speaker 3>silly to say that men care more about rules than

0:24:51.114 --> 0:24:54.634
<v Speaker 3>women while we're watching the world burn, because a bunch

0:24:54.674 --> 0:24:57.914
<v Speaker 3>of men who are probably at Chris Jenner's birthday party

0:24:58.154 --> 0:24:59.754
<v Speaker 3>don't care about rules at all.

0:24:59.954 --> 0:25:03.394
<v Speaker 2>Her other point is that men are warriors and they

0:25:03.434 --> 0:25:07.874
<v Speaker 2>have been like evolutionarily primed to go to right, so

0:25:07.914 --> 0:25:12.434
<v Speaker 2>they are all about conflict, aggression and resolution. And I'm like,

0:25:12.474 --> 0:25:14.514
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if you've read a story about war,

0:25:14.594 --> 0:25:17.513
<v Speaker 2>but war is not often a story of resolution, Like

0:25:17.594 --> 0:25:19.793
<v Speaker 2>it takes a lot of time and a lot of death.

0:25:20.394 --> 0:25:24.434
<v Speaker 2>And if that is the blueprint of our corporate workforce,

0:25:24.514 --> 0:25:26.274
<v Speaker 2>then I have a few criticians.

0:25:26.314 --> 0:25:29.514
<v Speaker 3>World War One was followed by World War yes exactly.

0:25:29.554 --> 0:25:31.394
<v Speaker 2>I don't think that they all then hold hands and go.

0:25:31.474 --> 0:25:34.554
<v Speaker 2>Now we all agree where she says women obviously their

0:25:34.554 --> 0:25:38.114
<v Speaker 2>only job is to have and look after children, and

0:25:38.194 --> 0:25:43.154
<v Speaker 2>therefore they are more about social dynamics talking.

0:25:42.914 --> 0:25:45.114
<v Speaker 1>Jesse are not being fair about this book that she loves.

0:25:45.234 --> 0:25:46.274
<v Speaker 1>What she says is.

0:25:47.234 --> 0:25:50.794
<v Speaker 3>Then are warriors, meaning they go out and fight battles.

0:25:51.274 --> 0:25:56.434
<v Speaker 3>Women are warriors, meaning they worry about things exactly.

0:25:56.994 --> 0:26:00.553
<v Speaker 2>And what we need is the workforce is best run

0:26:01.034 --> 0:26:05.594
<v Speaker 2>by warriors, which is the war ones. And if you

0:26:05.674 --> 0:26:06.434
<v Speaker 2>can see it.

0:26:06.394 --> 0:26:12.274
<v Speaker 3>Sounds better in an American access, I will say.

0:26:10.994 --> 0:26:16.914
<v Speaker 1>I am just I'm really frustrated obviously at these conversations

0:26:16.914 --> 0:26:20.754
<v Speaker 1>because it's not conversation, it's provocation. And it makes feminism

0:26:21.114 --> 0:26:24.554
<v Speaker 1>this idea that women want to be seen as same

0:26:24.954 --> 0:26:27.314
<v Speaker 1>and it's not that at all. We obviously are different

0:26:27.354 --> 0:26:29.394
<v Speaker 1>to men, like that's not the question, and that was

0:26:29.474 --> 0:26:32.594
<v Speaker 1>never what feminism was about. Feminism is about equality. It's

0:26:32.594 --> 0:26:36.514
<v Speaker 1>about political equality, it's about social equality, it's about economic equality.

0:26:36.554 --> 0:26:39.754
<v Speaker 1>It's not about being the same as men. Women bring

0:26:39.794 --> 0:26:42.513
<v Speaker 1>different things to the table. It doesn't mean they're worse things.

0:26:42.714 --> 0:26:44.954
<v Speaker 1>We are flawed just as men are. We're going to

0:26:45.034 --> 0:26:47.714
<v Speaker 1>make mistakes and do things just as men do. But

0:26:47.754 --> 0:26:49.514
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the day, if we can together

0:26:49.594 --> 0:26:53.394
<v Speaker 1>work together to make it an equal experience, regardless of

0:26:53.394 --> 0:26:55.474
<v Speaker 1>what skills we bring to the table, that is what

0:26:55.514 --> 0:26:59.274
<v Speaker 1>feminism aimed to do. And the problem with the word

0:26:59.354 --> 0:27:01.874
<v Speaker 1>feminism is it has the word feminine in it, and

0:27:02.594 --> 0:27:06.234
<v Speaker 1>men conservative men in particular, see that as lesser. We

0:27:06.314 --> 0:27:08.553
<v Speaker 1>don't want to be that that is a threat to

0:27:08.594 --> 0:27:13.634
<v Speaker 1>my masculinity instead of seeing it as an accompaniment or

0:27:13.754 --> 0:27:17.313
<v Speaker 1>a way to improve yourself is by aligning with that

0:27:17.354 --> 0:27:20.714
<v Speaker 1>femininity and exploring that and seeing how that can work

0:27:20.794 --> 0:27:24.674
<v Speaker 1>better together. Because the patriarchy, yes, started with men who

0:27:24.714 --> 0:27:29.434
<v Speaker 1>will worry yours and who decided that this combatitive nature

0:27:29.514 --> 0:27:32.514
<v Speaker 1>of government and the way that people should be put

0:27:32.554 --> 0:27:34.954
<v Speaker 1>in their place. That's why that was created at a

0:27:34.994 --> 0:27:38.354
<v Speaker 1>time where that difference between men and women was because

0:27:38.394 --> 0:27:41.354
<v Speaker 1>men were physically stronger, and so that was how that

0:27:41.434 --> 0:27:43.874
<v Speaker 1>had to play out in that time. In our existence

0:27:43.954 --> 0:27:48.674
<v Speaker 1>right now, we understand we do jobs that don't require physicality,

0:27:48.914 --> 0:27:51.114
<v Speaker 1>and for that you don't need to be a man

0:27:51.274 --> 0:27:54.194
<v Speaker 1>or a woman or any gender in particular. You can

0:27:54.594 --> 0:27:57.874
<v Speaker 1>actually be the same on the same playing field. But

0:27:57.954 --> 0:28:00.634
<v Speaker 1>you have to understand that that system has to be

0:28:00.674 --> 0:28:04.513
<v Speaker 1>dismantled first. And men are so unwilling to let that

0:28:04.634 --> 0:28:06.954
<v Speaker 1>go because when you're at the top of the food chain,

0:28:07.314 --> 0:28:08.914
<v Speaker 1>why would you want to share that with anyone?

0:28:09.114 --> 0:28:11.754
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think some men are and interestingly here some

0:28:11.834 --> 0:28:13.994
<v Speaker 2>women are right, And there's a question at the end

0:28:14.034 --> 0:28:17.354
<v Speaker 2>of the interview where Helen is asked to name a

0:28:17.394 --> 0:28:20.474
<v Speaker 2>feminine attribute that she thinks is good and she can't

0:28:20.514 --> 0:28:23.074
<v Speaker 2>do it. She can's going back and forth and being

0:28:23.354 --> 0:28:26.674
<v Speaker 2>like she really struggles to go. Is there anything about

0:28:26.714 --> 0:28:30.634
<v Speaker 2>the feminine or female inclusion in the workplace that might

0:28:30.754 --> 0:28:33.714
<v Speaker 2>be read as positive? But I see your point clear

0:28:33.794 --> 0:28:36.794
<v Speaker 2>that it's like it's about the workplace is going to change.

0:28:36.794 --> 0:28:38.474
<v Speaker 2>And if you look at your Jeff Bezos as the

0:28:38.514 --> 0:28:42.634
<v Speaker 2>example of your masculine vices, So let's pillage the environment,

0:28:42.874 --> 0:28:46.754
<v Speaker 2>let's exploit people. Let's money at all costs a certain.

0:28:46.634 --> 0:28:49.074
<v Speaker 3>Pe in water bottles instead of having toilet breaks if

0:28:49.074 --> 0:28:50.234
<v Speaker 3>they work at an Amazon.

0:28:49.914 --> 0:28:53.114
<v Speaker 1>Fashion exactly, and you know what, that is profitable.

0:28:53.194 --> 0:28:56.514
<v Speaker 2>And if that's the world that Helen Andrews is advocating for,

0:28:56.834 --> 0:28:59.994
<v Speaker 2>then you are right. But I think that a lot

0:29:00.034 --> 0:29:02.754
<v Speaker 2>of us men and women are going that's not the

0:29:02.834 --> 0:29:06.994
<v Speaker 2>kind of workplace that's actually functional or sustainable or works

0:29:07.114 --> 0:29:07.554
<v Speaker 2>long term.

0:29:07.634 --> 0:29:10.114
<v Speaker 1>It's really hard for women to pea and water bottles

0:29:10.114 --> 0:29:12.794
<v Speaker 1>really difficult unless you have a shi wi that will

0:29:12.794 --> 0:29:13.194
<v Speaker 1>make things.

0:29:14.194 --> 0:29:16.194
<v Speaker 3>And number two, i'd just say, if you've got a

0:29:16.234 --> 0:29:19.474
<v Speaker 3>party house in a regular house, maybe you should interrogate

0:29:19.514 --> 0:29:22.074
<v Speaker 3>how you're running a business that made that possible exactly.

0:29:22.114 --> 0:29:24.674
<v Speaker 2>Maybe you just need one house there. The female said it,

0:29:24.834 --> 0:29:26.794
<v Speaker 2>I said it, How dad are you?

0:29:29.034 --> 0:29:31.754
<v Speaker 3>If you were born before nineteen ninety seven, I've got

0:29:31.754 --> 0:29:33.874
<v Speaker 3>a few things I want to update you on, and

0:29:33.914 --> 0:29:36.594
<v Speaker 3>if you were born after nineteen ninety seven, I'd suggest

0:29:36.634 --> 0:29:37.674
<v Speaker 3>you should listen along.

0:29:37.754 --> 0:29:39.434
<v Speaker 1>You might learn something. How about that?

0:29:40.114 --> 0:29:44.594
<v Speaker 3>Respect your olders, sorry, respect your elders. The first thing

0:29:44.674 --> 0:29:47.394
<v Speaker 3>I wanted to tell us people born before nineteen ninety

0:29:47.394 --> 0:29:49.514
<v Speaker 3>seven is that I went to an oasis this weekend.

0:29:50.754 --> 0:29:53.754
<v Speaker 3>Oh okay, I went to their concert and it was

0:29:53.874 --> 0:29:56.434
<v Speaker 3>so great well that I had the best time. Holly

0:29:56.554 --> 0:29:58.554
<v Speaker 3>was there too. We were singing our heart out to

0:29:58.594 --> 0:30:01.354
<v Speaker 3>Don't Look Back in Anger. The second thing I want

0:30:01.394 --> 0:30:05.194
<v Speaker 3>to tell you about is that we are apparently doing

0:30:05.354 --> 0:30:06.554
<v Speaker 3>something else wrong.

0:30:06.754 --> 0:30:09.594
<v Speaker 1>Now, can we just add it to the list of things? Okay,

0:30:09.634 --> 0:30:12.554
<v Speaker 1>what are we doing wrong today? Amelia? Millennials go around?

0:30:12.554 --> 0:30:14.234
<v Speaker 1>Because I just found out that we were getting made

0:30:14.234 --> 0:30:17.154
<v Speaker 1>butter for something called the millennial Smile.

0:30:17.474 --> 0:30:21.594
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so the millennial smile. It's essentially what Tyra Banks

0:30:21.594 --> 0:30:23.994
<v Speaker 3>told us to do when she said to smiles, remember that.

0:30:25.034 --> 0:30:27.194
<v Speaker 1>It's smiling with your eyes, smiling with your eyes.

0:30:27.234 --> 0:30:30.274
<v Speaker 3>Your lips are closed, you're smiling with your eyes, You're

0:30:30.274 --> 0:30:32.874
<v Speaker 3>looking very benevolent about the world. And look, I would

0:30:33.034 --> 0:30:36.474
<v Speaker 3>rather be accused of having the millennial smile than the

0:30:36.554 --> 0:30:39.114
<v Speaker 3>gen z stare. I'm just going to put that out there.

0:30:39.674 --> 0:30:43.074
<v Speaker 3>But also I did feel deeply shamed and guilty when

0:30:43.114 --> 0:30:46.994
<v Speaker 3>I watched this video because I absolutely do the millennial smile,

0:30:47.114 --> 0:30:48.314
<v Speaker 3>particularly in selfies.

0:30:48.474 --> 0:30:51.434
<v Speaker 2>Okay, because what was distinctive about this smile too, is

0:30:51.474 --> 0:30:54.514
<v Speaker 2>that you don't open your lips, right, I like yours.

0:30:54.514 --> 0:30:59.394
<v Speaker 1>First raised up. But it's not dark faced. No, it's

0:30:59.394 --> 0:31:01.594
<v Speaker 1>just like a very gentle like I don't even know

0:31:01.634 --> 0:31:02.234
<v Speaker 1>how to smirk.

0:31:03.794 --> 0:31:07.554
<v Speaker 2>It's how I smiled when I had braces, which was

0:31:07.634 --> 0:31:11.194
<v Speaker 2>like I'm trying to hide my dental work. Now, I

0:31:11.194 --> 0:31:13.834
<v Speaker 2>think because I had braces on my teeth, I was scappy,

0:31:13.874 --> 0:31:16.474
<v Speaker 2>and I had that two years. I feel like now

0:31:16.554 --> 0:31:20.034
<v Speaker 2>I'm still just stoked. I don't have races anymore, so

0:31:20.114 --> 0:31:22.794
<v Speaker 2>I smile with all the teeth. But we had to

0:31:22.914 --> 0:31:25.834
<v Speaker 2>have a smile in our bank for when we took

0:31:25.994 --> 0:31:29.914
<v Speaker 2>our forty eight MySpace photos like an album of our

0:31:29.994 --> 0:31:33.114
<v Speaker 2>night out where we just looked exactly the same at

0:31:33.114 --> 0:31:35.754
<v Speaker 2>the nightclub with our digital camera, where we would do

0:31:36.394 --> 0:31:38.314
<v Speaker 2>that face with our like good angle.

0:31:38.434 --> 0:31:40.554
<v Speaker 3>That's interesting because I've got a slightly different theory ast

0:31:40.554 --> 0:31:43.794
<v Speaker 3>how originated, which is maybe because I'm an elder millennial

0:31:43.914 --> 0:31:46.514
<v Speaker 3>and you are a baby millennial. Yes, that the term

0:31:47.274 --> 0:31:51.834
<v Speaker 3>us elder millennials still remember taking the little camera roll

0:31:52.154 --> 0:31:56.754
<v Speaker 3>to the chemist to get the photos printed. Yes, And

0:31:56.794 --> 0:31:58.714
<v Speaker 3>there was always this moment that you went to pick

0:31:58.794 --> 0:32:00.954
<v Speaker 3>up the photos once they were printed, and your hands

0:32:00.954 --> 0:32:03.754
<v Speaker 3>will practically be shaking as you open this envelope to

0:32:03.834 --> 0:32:07.074
<v Speaker 3>see if amongst the twenty four photos that you had careful,

0:32:07.674 --> 0:32:09.874
<v Speaker 3>there may be one that is good enough for you

0:32:09.954 --> 0:32:13.074
<v Speaker 3>to perhaps frame. Yeah, and you put up on your

0:32:13.114 --> 0:32:18.274
<v Speaker 3>walls venue. And so we didn't have endless, endless opportunities

0:32:18.314 --> 0:32:20.994
<v Speaker 3>to take photos. We only had the photos that we

0:32:21.034 --> 0:32:24.074
<v Speaker 3>had on our twenty four photo role, Okay, And so

0:32:24.114 --> 0:32:26.994
<v Speaker 3>we had to develop a fool proof way of smiling.

0:32:27.074 --> 0:32:29.034
<v Speaker 3>And I see you not in Claire, You know what

0:32:29.074 --> 0:32:29.714
<v Speaker 3>I'm talking about.

0:32:29.714 --> 0:32:31.314
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So we couldn't risk it with teeth.

0:32:31.634 --> 0:32:33.794
<v Speaker 1>Here's what you're saying, we couldn't. We can teek it

0:32:33.834 --> 0:32:38.034
<v Speaker 1>with teeth. Teeth changes everything. And that's the thing. Is

0:32:38.074 --> 0:32:40.554
<v Speaker 1>like when you are looking at your face in a camera,

0:32:40.914 --> 0:32:43.674
<v Speaker 1>like if you don't smile with your teeth, it like

0:32:43.834 --> 0:32:46.634
<v Speaker 1>elongates your cheeks a little bit, and like you don't

0:32:46.674 --> 0:32:49.274
<v Speaker 1>look like a crazy person. And sometimes when you smile

0:32:49.314 --> 0:32:51.674
<v Speaker 1>with all your teeth, it changes the whole shape of

0:32:51.714 --> 0:32:54.354
<v Speaker 1>your face and like it broadens out your cheeks and

0:32:54.394 --> 0:32:56.754
<v Speaker 1>it like changes squints up your eyes a little bit.

0:32:56.834 --> 0:32:58.834
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes you want your eyes to be the focus, not

0:32:58.914 --> 0:33:02.314
<v Speaker 1>the mouth. So it's been practiced in a way that

0:33:02.394 --> 0:33:05.594
<v Speaker 1>you know that if I deliver this photo in a

0:33:05.634 --> 0:33:08.514
<v Speaker 1>certain way, it'll probably turn out kind of okay. The

0:33:08.594 --> 0:33:11.714
<v Speaker 1>smile is unpredictable and it depends on who you're standing

0:33:11.794 --> 0:33:14.074
<v Speaker 1>next to, what angle you're looking at, Like, there's a

0:33:14.114 --> 0:33:17.194
<v Speaker 1>lot of unknowns with a smile. Oh, I've been practicing forever.

0:33:17.394 --> 0:33:20.634
<v Speaker 2>I lose my eyes, Like there are lots of issues. Also,

0:33:20.834 --> 0:33:24.914
<v Speaker 2>my chin scrunches. There is a high probability of error.

0:33:24.994 --> 0:33:27.114
<v Speaker 2>I just wish that I had maybe had this advice

0:33:27.194 --> 0:33:27.874
<v Speaker 2>before my wedding.

0:33:27.954 --> 0:33:30.514
<v Speaker 1>Well, can I just say I went to my niece's

0:33:30.554 --> 0:33:34.234
<v Speaker 1>twenty first birthday very recently, and she had like this

0:33:34.394 --> 0:33:38.074
<v Speaker 1>glorious setup with like draped fabric and candles and like

0:33:38.114 --> 0:33:39.874
<v Speaker 1>things that people were posing in front of to have

0:33:39.874 --> 0:33:42.394
<v Speaker 1>their photos taken. And someone handed me a camera and

0:33:42.434 --> 0:33:44.434
<v Speaker 1>said can you take some photos for us? And I

0:33:44.474 --> 0:33:47.394
<v Speaker 1>was like, of course, I'm cool. I can hang with

0:33:47.394 --> 0:33:49.434
<v Speaker 1>twenty one year olds and take a decent photo. I've

0:33:49.434 --> 0:33:50.954
<v Speaker 1>been doing this for a long time.

0:33:51.074 --> 0:33:54.274
<v Speaker 3>I think that you using the phrase I can hang

0:33:54.394 --> 0:33:56.354
<v Speaker 3>with twenty one year olds was your first.

0:33:56.154 --> 0:33:58.594
<v Speaker 1>I mean internally, yes, but I would never say that

0:33:58.634 --> 0:34:00.434
<v Speaker 1>out loud in front of the young people for fear

0:34:00.474 --> 0:34:02.914
<v Speaker 1>of being judged. But I walked up and I held

0:34:02.994 --> 0:34:06.034
<v Speaker 1>up the camera and before I'd even like gone to press,

0:34:06.034 --> 0:34:07.834
<v Speaker 1>they were like no, no, no, no, no, no, no no,

0:34:07.914 --> 0:34:10.553
<v Speaker 1>this is all wrong. Step back. I now have to

0:34:10.554 --> 0:34:13.714
<v Speaker 1>take the photos from like under boob height. Oh I

0:34:13.714 --> 0:34:17.114
<v Speaker 1>thought of the camera. No no, no, we do not

0:34:17.194 --> 0:34:20.194
<v Speaker 1>take from above. You take from below. And then you

0:34:20.234 --> 0:34:23.354
<v Speaker 1>take forty eight photos speech shots, whatever you want to

0:34:23.394 --> 0:34:27.114
<v Speaker 1>do of them, kind of subtly shifting without smiling, and

0:34:27.154 --> 0:34:30.194
<v Speaker 1>then some with smiles and then some with them on

0:34:30.234 --> 0:34:32.074
<v Speaker 1>the opposite sides. But it's all done from like this

0:34:32.194 --> 0:34:34.794
<v Speaker 1>under boob height, because they want the whole fit in

0:34:34.834 --> 0:34:38.274
<v Speaker 1>the photo. There's no more above shots anymore. That is gone,

0:34:38.354 --> 0:34:41.234
<v Speaker 1>that is out. There's a whole new law coming up

0:34:41.274 --> 0:34:44.433
<v Speaker 1>through the ranks of how to take a photo, when

0:34:44.514 --> 0:34:46.514
<v Speaker 1>is appropriate to take a photo, and what faces you

0:34:46.554 --> 0:34:49.074
<v Speaker 1>pull in that photo. Like these are lessons that I

0:34:49.074 --> 0:34:50.274
<v Speaker 1>am still learning, Claire.

0:34:50.434 --> 0:34:53.194
<v Speaker 3>There might be law, there might be new lessons, but

0:34:53.314 --> 0:34:56.674
<v Speaker 3>all I have to say to my gen z's is yes.

0:34:56.914 --> 0:35:00.714
<v Speaker 3>This weekend I took a millennial smile photo from above

0:35:01.114 --> 0:35:06.874
<v Speaker 3>as a selfie while singing Wonder War, and I regret nothing.

0:35:08.194 --> 0:35:08.994
<v Speaker 1>After the break.

0:35:09.234 --> 0:35:12.074
<v Speaker 3>Do you have any friends who you don't agree with politically,

0:35:12.234 --> 0:35:15.033
<v Speaker 3>maybe even you don't agree with your partner politically. Well,

0:35:15.114 --> 0:35:19.154
<v Speaker 3>Jennifer Lawrence and Sydney Sweeney have some differing theories on

0:35:19.194 --> 0:35:19.954
<v Speaker 3>how you should.

0:35:19.754 --> 0:35:20.154
<v Speaker 1>Deal with that.

0:35:21.154 --> 0:35:24.474
<v Speaker 2>Every Tuesday and Thursday, we drop new segments of Mummyer

0:35:24.514 --> 0:35:28.074
<v Speaker 2>out Loud just for MUMMYA subscribers. Follow the link in

0:35:28.114 --> 0:35:30.114
<v Speaker 2>the show notes to get your daily dose of out

0:35:30.114 --> 0:35:32.354
<v Speaker 2>Loud and a big thank you to all.

0:35:32.274 --> 0:35:33.473
<v Speaker 1>Our current subscribers.

0:35:39.194 --> 0:35:42.714
<v Speaker 3>So I've started getting the newspaper delivered because I'm regressing

0:35:42.754 --> 0:35:46.354
<v Speaker 3>into my old man era, and my.

0:35:46.354 --> 0:35:48.634
<v Speaker 1>Best friend still buys the newspaper, but she buys it

0:35:48.634 --> 0:35:51.594
<v Speaker 1>almost specifically for the TV guide. She's such a nana.

0:35:51.634 --> 0:35:52.314
<v Speaker 1>I don't love it.

0:35:52.794 --> 0:35:54.714
<v Speaker 3>I was reading it on the weekend and I was

0:35:54.794 --> 0:35:58.474
<v Speaker 3>millennial smiling as I turned the pages, modeling healthy reading

0:35:58.474 --> 0:35:59.514
<v Speaker 3>habits for my children.

0:35:59.714 --> 0:36:01.874
<v Speaker 1>Do you sniff your newspaper? No?

0:36:01.994 --> 0:36:02.154
<v Speaker 3>Oh?

0:36:02.194 --> 0:36:05.554
<v Speaker 1>I love, Oh God, the smell of a newspaper. I

0:36:05.594 --> 0:36:07.114
<v Speaker 1>do miss it. Well, I must do that.

0:36:07.674 --> 0:36:12.034
<v Speaker 3>I stopped and I read this survey result that really

0:36:12.794 --> 0:36:16.594
<v Speaker 3>surprised me, shocked me, appalled me. It was a survey

0:36:16.634 --> 0:36:20.914
<v Speaker 3>conducted by McKinnon, an Australian firm, and basically the headline

0:36:20.994 --> 0:36:24.394
<v Speaker 3>is it says that young people are much more likely

0:36:24.594 --> 0:36:28.194
<v Speaker 3>to cut ties in a friendship if someone disagrees with

0:36:28.234 --> 0:36:31.593
<v Speaker 3>them politically. Basically, different political views have become a deal

0:36:31.594 --> 0:36:34.274
<v Speaker 3>breaker for young people. And the stats are quite striking.

0:36:34.354 --> 0:36:35.274
<v Speaker 2>And this was Australian.

0:36:35.394 --> 0:36:36.234
<v Speaker 1>This is Australia.

0:36:36.554 --> 0:36:40.314
<v Speaker 3>One in five eighteen to twenty four year old Australians

0:36:40.554 --> 0:36:44.194
<v Speaker 3>say that different political views are a deal breaker. But

0:36:44.314 --> 0:36:46.554
<v Speaker 3>you compare that to people who over sixty five, and

0:36:46.594 --> 0:36:48.274
<v Speaker 3>that's only one in twenty.

0:36:48.074 --> 0:36:50.274
<v Speaker 1>Say that different political views are a deal breaker.

0:36:50.714 --> 0:36:53.873
<v Speaker 3>And it's interesting because we've been seeing a lot of

0:36:53.914 --> 0:36:58.594
<v Speaker 3>celebrities recently, mostly in the US, being sort of called

0:36:58.634 --> 0:37:00.594
<v Speaker 3>to question about their political.

0:37:00.274 --> 0:37:02.154
<v Speaker 1>Views, and they know.

0:37:02.474 --> 0:37:05.274
<v Speaker 3>I think they know instinctively that this has become the

0:37:05.314 --> 0:37:08.434
<v Speaker 3>third rail, particularly for young people. Like celebrities used to

0:37:08.474 --> 0:37:10.953
<v Speaker 3>be comfortable showing political views with us, but now they

0:37:11.034 --> 0:37:14.074
<v Speaker 3>sense that the vibe has shifted. So, for instance, here's

0:37:14.154 --> 0:37:17.754
<v Speaker 3>Jennifer Lawrence talking about this exact issue recently to The

0:37:17.794 --> 0:37:18.514
<v Speaker 3>New York Times.

0:37:18.594 --> 0:37:23.594
<v Speaker 5>I think I'm in a complicated recalibration because I'm also

0:37:23.634 --> 0:37:28.513
<v Speaker 5>an artist, and I with this temperature and the way

0:37:28.514 --> 0:37:32.594
<v Speaker 5>that things can turn out, I don't want to start

0:37:32.634 --> 0:37:36.834
<v Speaker 5>turning people off to films and too art that could

0:37:36.994 --> 0:37:40.994
<v Speaker 5>change consciousness or change the world because they don't like

0:37:41.834 --> 0:37:43.074
<v Speaker 5>my political opinions.

0:37:43.474 --> 0:37:45.834
<v Speaker 3>Now, look, Jennifer Lawrence, yes, she says she's an artist,

0:37:45.874 --> 0:37:47.554
<v Speaker 3>she's a very good actor. But I think this is

0:37:47.594 --> 0:37:51.154
<v Speaker 3>relevant to everyone right because right now everyone's living in

0:37:51.154 --> 0:37:53.834
<v Speaker 3>this heightened political environment. The temperature is high for all

0:37:53.874 --> 0:37:56.393
<v Speaker 3>of us. We may not be artists, but we are

0:37:56.434 --> 0:37:58.754
<v Speaker 3>still having to figure out how to interact with other

0:37:58.794 --> 0:38:02.194
<v Speaker 3>people who might not agree with us. So Jennifer Lawrence,

0:38:02.354 --> 0:38:05.074
<v Speaker 3>very vocal during Trump one, basically has stepped back and

0:38:05.074 --> 0:38:06.953
<v Speaker 3>said I'm not going to talk about politics now during

0:38:07.154 --> 0:38:10.994
<v Speaker 3>second Shomp administration. So I am curious whether you feel

0:38:10.994 --> 0:38:13.914
<v Speaker 3>this vibe shift too, Jesse. Do you feel like politics

0:38:13.914 --> 0:38:15.674
<v Speaker 3>has become a real no go?

0:38:16.354 --> 0:38:18.513
<v Speaker 2>Yes, And I feel as though there's a shift. I'm

0:38:18.554 --> 0:38:23.074
<v Speaker 2>certainly seeing it among celebrities that they're sort of going.

0:38:23.314 --> 0:38:25.114
<v Speaker 2>I know, it doesn't make a difference, and that's what

0:38:25.194 --> 0:38:27.594
<v Speaker 2>Jennifer Lawrence said, doesn't make a difference when I come

0:38:27.594 --> 0:38:29.274
<v Speaker 2>out and tell you how to It's not like it's

0:38:29.274 --> 0:38:32.393
<v Speaker 2>shifting the needle and suddenly everyone votes for Harris. That's

0:38:32.674 --> 0:38:36.274
<v Speaker 2>simply not what happened. And the second thing is my

0:38:36.554 --> 0:38:40.274
<v Speaker 2>work tells my story, so for a lot of creatives,

0:38:40.314 --> 0:38:42.234
<v Speaker 2>and I think that we put this pressure on a

0:38:42.234 --> 0:38:45.714
<v Speaker 2>lot of different types of artists, whether it's writers or

0:38:45.794 --> 0:38:49.873
<v Speaker 2>journalists or actors or musicians. It's like I have a

0:38:49.914 --> 0:38:52.354
<v Speaker 2>certain set of politics. It might not reveal how I vote,

0:38:52.794 --> 0:38:55.594
<v Speaker 2>but what my values are and what I believe that

0:38:55.674 --> 0:38:58.834
<v Speaker 2>I convey through my work. And I don't owe you

0:38:59.674 --> 0:39:02.873
<v Speaker 2>my ballot card. I don't need to tell you that.

0:39:03.114 --> 0:39:06.674
<v Speaker 2>And in fact, Sidney Sweeney did an interview recently as well,

0:39:06.714 --> 0:39:09.914
<v Speaker 2>which has been widely criticized, but I thought some of

0:39:09.954 --> 0:39:13.034
<v Speaker 2>her answers were actually masterful. And she was asked about this,

0:39:13.154 --> 0:39:13.913
<v Speaker 2>and here's what she said.

0:39:14.234 --> 0:39:18.234
<v Speaker 4>The criticism of the content, which was basically that maybe

0:39:18.274 --> 0:39:21.634
<v Speaker 4>specifically in this political climate, like wait, people shouldn't joke

0:39:21.714 --> 0:39:25.354
<v Speaker 4>about genetic superiority like that was kind of like the

0:39:25.394 --> 0:39:28.554
<v Speaker 4>criticism broadly speaking. And since you were talking about this,

0:39:28.594 --> 0:39:30.473
<v Speaker 4>I just wanted to give you an opportunity to talk

0:39:30.514 --> 0:39:31.554
<v Speaker 4>about that specifically.

0:39:32.074 --> 0:39:35.393
<v Speaker 1>I think that when I have an issue, though, I

0:39:35.474 --> 0:39:36.794
<v Speaker 1>want to speak about people.

0:39:36.954 --> 0:39:39.634
<v Speaker 3>Here the subtext of that they're referring, of course, to

0:39:39.714 --> 0:39:40.554
<v Speaker 3>that American eagle.

0:39:40.754 --> 0:39:41.393
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, she did.

0:39:41.594 --> 0:39:45.194
<v Speaker 3>That. Whole interview with GQ was basically trying to go

0:39:45.514 --> 0:39:49.514
<v Speaker 3>Sydney Sweeney into distancing herself from rumors that she supports

0:39:49.554 --> 0:39:53.234
<v Speaker 3>Donald Trump. The whole interview, it wasn't about her acting.

0:39:53.474 --> 0:39:56.034
<v Speaker 3>It wasn't about even her personal life really, even though

0:39:56.074 --> 0:39:58.434
<v Speaker 3>she is dating Scooter Braun, which is weird. It was

0:39:58.634 --> 0:40:01.634
<v Speaker 3>all about trying to get at whether or not she

0:40:01.994 --> 0:40:04.354
<v Speaker 3>is a Trump supporter, and she was not playing that game.

0:40:04.514 --> 0:40:05.074
<v Speaker 3>And this is the thing.

0:40:05.154 --> 0:40:08.393
<v Speaker 2>She's twenty eight years old, she grew up in a

0:40:08.674 --> 0:40:10.954
<v Speaker 2>red state or whatever, and we all know from Australia

0:40:11.034 --> 0:40:13.034
<v Speaker 2>to the US, pretty much anywhere in the world. You

0:40:13.114 --> 0:40:15.234
<v Speaker 2>know what, the biggest thing that dictates how you voted,

0:40:15.434 --> 0:40:18.074
<v Speaker 2>your post code. That's why I think that even the

0:40:18.234 --> 0:40:23.234
<v Speaker 2>story of how our tolerance for people who vote differently

0:40:23.314 --> 0:40:25.634
<v Speaker 2>to us changes over a lifetime, I think that's a

0:40:25.714 --> 0:40:28.234
<v Speaker 2>story of wisdom. I think that people over sixty five

0:40:29.154 --> 0:40:32.274
<v Speaker 2>know something about having met a lot of different people

0:40:32.314 --> 0:40:34.154
<v Speaker 2>from a lot of different walks of life, and they're

0:40:34.234 --> 0:40:37.674
<v Speaker 2>just more comfortable going. I'd like to align on values

0:40:37.714 --> 0:40:39.154
<v Speaker 2>with you, but that doesn't mean that we have to

0:40:39.234 --> 0:40:40.954
<v Speaker 2>vote the same. Do you agree, Claire?

0:40:41.234 --> 0:40:43.114
<v Speaker 1>Look, I just want to point out that we have

0:40:43.234 --> 0:40:47.674
<v Speaker 1>played grabs from two young white women whose experience in

0:40:47.714 --> 0:40:50.953
<v Speaker 1>the political sphere is very different to say, if they

0:40:51.034 --> 0:40:55.234
<v Speaker 1>were from a minority, and the politics that is current

0:40:55.954 --> 0:40:58.834
<v Speaker 1>affects those people quite deeply, and I feel like it's

0:40:58.834 --> 0:41:01.234
<v Speaker 1>a very privileged place to come from to say I

0:41:01.314 --> 0:41:04.754
<v Speaker 1>will no longer discuss it because in reality, they do

0:41:04.914 --> 0:41:06.994
<v Speaker 1>have a platform. Whether it makes a big difference for

0:41:07.154 --> 0:41:08.714
<v Speaker 1>who people vote for or not, they still have a

0:41:08.754 --> 0:41:11.953
<v Speaker 1>platform on which they can disagree with politics. It hurts people,

0:41:12.714 --> 0:41:16.194
<v Speaker 1>and I think that should be noted. But I come

0:41:16.274 --> 0:41:19.034
<v Speaker 1>from a time as a kid where you never spoke

0:41:19.034 --> 0:41:21.834
<v Speaker 1>about your politics. I very distinctly remember going to my

0:41:21.874 --> 0:41:23.913
<v Speaker 1>local primary school with my mum on election day one

0:41:24.034 --> 0:41:26.034
<v Speaker 1>year and I said to her, like, who did you

0:41:26.114 --> 0:41:27.634
<v Speaker 1>vote for? When she came out, and she said, we

0:41:27.674 --> 0:41:30.194
<v Speaker 1>don't share that information. We don't talk about that. And

0:41:30.274 --> 0:41:32.354
<v Speaker 1>it was very much like politics and religion were no

0:41:32.474 --> 0:41:34.714
<v Speaker 1>go zones when it came to discussing anything with your

0:41:34.914 --> 0:41:38.154
<v Speaker 1>friendship circle, especially around the dinner table. You just didn't

0:41:38.314 --> 0:41:41.554
<v Speaker 1>because it was divisive and because it could end in tears,

0:41:41.634 --> 0:41:45.714
<v Speaker 1>and so you saved your relationships by not discussing those things.

0:41:46.114 --> 0:41:48.594
<v Speaker 1>But I think now we more understand just how much

0:41:48.674 --> 0:41:50.914
<v Speaker 1>politics hurts people. And I think if we are in

0:41:50.994 --> 0:41:53.754
<v Speaker 1>a position to say something, to say something out loud,

0:41:53.914 --> 0:41:57.114
<v Speaker 1>that maybe might make a difference to somebody somewhere. I

0:41:57.194 --> 0:42:00.914
<v Speaker 1>think that's really important to do. But in whether you

0:42:00.954 --> 0:42:03.314
<v Speaker 1>should end a relationship because you think differently from someone,

0:42:03.354 --> 0:42:05.594
<v Speaker 1>I think that is where we're really falling down, because

0:42:06.194 --> 0:42:09.914
<v Speaker 1>we have an opportunityy to burst through people's echo chambers,

0:42:10.394 --> 0:42:14.114
<v Speaker 1>and instead we're fortifying echo chambers for people. So if

0:42:14.194 --> 0:42:16.514
<v Speaker 1>you say to somebody because they believe differently to you

0:42:17.154 --> 0:42:19.074
<v Speaker 1>that you no longer want to spend any time with them.

0:42:19.474 --> 0:42:22.554
<v Speaker 1>They will organically move into spheres of people who are

0:42:22.594 --> 0:42:25.274
<v Speaker 1>more like minded. And all that does is create these

0:42:25.354 --> 0:42:28.674
<v Speaker 1>little loops of people, never busting out of that bubble

0:42:28.754 --> 0:42:31.114
<v Speaker 1>to explore anything outside of the world that they live in.

0:42:31.354 --> 0:42:34.954
<v Speaker 1>So we are doing ourselves a disservice by not allowing discourse.

0:42:35.194 --> 0:42:36.834
<v Speaker 1>We just shut it down and we say we are

0:42:36.914 --> 0:42:39.594
<v Speaker 1>no longer friends, instead of trying to talk things through

0:42:39.674 --> 0:42:42.914
<v Speaker 1>and understand. And that's what we see happening in politics everywhere.

0:42:43.394 --> 0:42:46.074
<v Speaker 1>They have echo chambers in their own party systems, and

0:42:46.154 --> 0:42:49.794
<v Speaker 1>so they don't even consider what's happening outside of that bubble.

0:42:49.874 --> 0:42:51.914
<v Speaker 1>They just automatically shut it down and move forward with

0:42:51.994 --> 0:42:54.473
<v Speaker 1>whatever it is is they're on their agenda for that day.

0:42:54.554 --> 0:42:57.594
<v Speaker 1>So we are creating just more fortified echo chambers from.

0:42:57.434 --> 0:43:00.553
<v Speaker 2>That, including ourselves, right, because we're not allowing our own

0:43:00.634 --> 0:43:03.234
<v Speaker 2>echo chamber to be challenged. But I want to ask

0:43:03.314 --> 0:43:06.074
<v Speaker 2>you on the Sydney thing. So she said, I've always

0:43:06.314 --> 0:43:09.553
<v Speaker 2>believed that I'm not here to tell people what to think.

0:43:09.634 --> 0:43:11.954
<v Speaker 2>I'm just here to open their eyes to different ideas.

0:43:11.994 --> 0:43:16.154
<v Speaker 2>And Jennifer Lawrence sort of said a similar thing, which is,

0:43:16.474 --> 0:43:19.594
<v Speaker 2>I think the focus should be on decision makers, right,

0:43:19.794 --> 0:43:23.154
<v Speaker 2>So when a big thing happens politically, we do see

0:43:23.194 --> 0:43:26.114
<v Speaker 2>a lot of people jump to Taylor Swift say something

0:43:26.514 --> 0:43:29.034
<v Speaker 2>like and I think that that's sometimes easier to run

0:43:29.074 --> 0:43:32.114
<v Speaker 2>to a comment section of even your favorite influencer or

0:43:32.234 --> 0:43:35.873
<v Speaker 2>your favorite musician, rather than lobbying a politician.

0:43:36.074 --> 0:43:38.834
<v Speaker 1>It's because we don't have that direct influence on the

0:43:38.914 --> 0:43:42.714
<v Speaker 1>decision makers. Even though they are elected by us, they

0:43:42.994 --> 0:43:46.554
<v Speaker 1>very rarely listen to us. So when you can reach

0:43:46.594 --> 0:43:49.154
<v Speaker 1>out to a celebrity and be seen in the comment

0:43:49.194 --> 0:43:52.674
<v Speaker 1>section and have maybe a news service pick up your

0:43:52.714 --> 0:43:55.314
<v Speaker 1>comments and have that bit like that feels like you

0:43:55.554 --> 0:43:59.154
<v Speaker 1>actually have some agency in all of this, whereas talking

0:43:59.234 --> 0:44:01.554
<v Speaker 1>to your decision makers, sending an email to some nameless,

0:44:01.594 --> 0:44:03.554
<v Speaker 1>faceless person in a front office that may or may

0:44:03.634 --> 0:44:06.554
<v Speaker 1>never respond to you like it feels very powerless.

0:44:06.874 --> 0:44:10.234
<v Speaker 3>I just feel like you both are talking about celebrities

0:44:10.354 --> 0:44:12.754
<v Speaker 3>like they're different from us in this day age, and

0:44:12.914 --> 0:44:15.314
<v Speaker 3>on this score, I don't think they are. What I

0:44:15.434 --> 0:44:18.594
<v Speaker 3>mean is Jennifer Lawrence and Sydney Sweeney. Yes, they both

0:44:18.674 --> 0:44:22.314
<v Speaker 3>have movies to sell, but all of us have to

0:44:22.394 --> 0:44:24.474
<v Speaker 3>work with other people, have to figure out how we

0:44:24.554 --> 0:44:26.754
<v Speaker 3>get what we want from other people, have to nurture

0:44:26.794 --> 0:44:29.314
<v Speaker 3>relationships with other people, whether they be our fans, or

0:44:29.394 --> 0:44:32.994
<v Speaker 3>our family or our colleagues. And what I found interesting

0:44:33.034 --> 0:44:35.594
<v Speaker 3>about both these women who are sort of we think

0:44:35.794 --> 0:44:38.593
<v Speaker 3>coming from different sides of a political spectrum. We don't

0:44:38.674 --> 0:44:40.754
<v Speaker 3>know that in Sydney Sweeney's case, but we think that

0:44:41.314 --> 0:44:43.393
<v Speaker 3>they've both come to the same conclusion, which is, to

0:44:43.474 --> 0:44:46.033
<v Speaker 3>get what you want from other people in twenty twenty five,

0:44:46.314 --> 0:44:50.593
<v Speaker 3>you cannot talk about politics. And that's what I found

0:44:50.674 --> 0:44:53.274
<v Speaker 3>so relatable about it. Yes, they both talked about their

0:44:53.434 --> 0:44:55.634
<v Speaker 3>art and about their craft, but really that's what it

0:44:55.714 --> 0:44:58.473
<v Speaker 3>comes down to. I think, if you want to get

0:44:58.514 --> 0:45:01.714
<v Speaker 3>what you want from other people without having them shut down,

0:45:01.794 --> 0:45:04.514
<v Speaker 3>without having them cut you off. We've seen the survey results.

0:45:04.554 --> 0:45:06.634
<v Speaker 3>People will cut you off if they think that you

0:45:06.714 --> 0:45:09.594
<v Speaker 3>have different politics to them. Is that a good situation

0:45:09.794 --> 0:45:11.594
<v Speaker 3>to be in? Maybe it's just a return to what

0:45:11.714 --> 0:45:13.554
<v Speaker 3>you were saying, Claire. In the olden days, there was

0:45:13.634 --> 0:45:16.354
<v Speaker 3>the conventional wisdom you didn't talk about politics, and then

0:45:16.394 --> 0:45:18.873
<v Speaker 3>we had this moment for a few decades where that

0:45:19.074 --> 0:45:21.394
<v Speaker 3>was seen as perfectly fine fault of the conversation.

0:45:21.634 --> 0:45:23.754
<v Speaker 2>I think that that's a good point, Amelia, that it's like,

0:45:24.554 --> 0:45:28.314
<v Speaker 2>have we returned to a family Christmas? We will not

0:45:28.394 --> 0:45:31.354
<v Speaker 2>talk about it around the dinner table, we wint I'm

0:45:31.434 --> 0:45:31.913
<v Speaker 2>sensing that.

0:45:31.954 --> 0:45:32.354
<v Speaker 1>A little bit.

0:45:32.474 --> 0:45:35.314
<v Speaker 3>I mean, Australia invented the secret ballot. We have always

0:45:35.354 --> 0:45:38.553
<v Speaker 3>been at people who is reluctant to share our political views,

0:45:38.634 --> 0:45:42.074
<v Speaker 3>certainly compared to our friendzy Americans who when you register

0:45:42.154 --> 0:45:44.434
<v Speaker 3>to vote, that you register to vote with a particular

0:45:44.554 --> 0:45:46.914
<v Speaker 3>party and you can look up anyone's party affiliation.

0:45:47.114 --> 0:45:48.513
<v Speaker 1>That is not the Australian way.

0:45:48.994 --> 0:45:52.274
<v Speaker 3>But I'm wondering if the last couple of decades of

0:45:52.554 --> 0:45:55.274
<v Speaker 3>everyone talking about politics all the time was just an

0:45:55.274 --> 0:45:58.393
<v Speaker 3>anomaly and was maybe just bad manners. Maybe we do

0:45:58.674 --> 0:46:00.754
<v Speaker 3>just need to regress to what our grandmothers told us,

0:46:00.754 --> 0:46:02.594
<v Speaker 3>which is do not talk about politics.

0:46:02.954 --> 0:46:04.473
<v Speaker 1>I would like to go back to a time where

0:46:04.554 --> 0:46:09.674
<v Speaker 1>politics wasn't such an atainment like it felt like back

0:46:09.714 --> 0:46:12.513
<v Speaker 1>in the day, politicians were beige and they did beij

0:46:12.634 --> 0:46:16.754
<v Speaker 1>things like make policy decisions and try to balance budgets

0:46:16.834 --> 0:46:18.913
<v Speaker 1>like it was beije as hell, and we didn't care

0:46:19.074 --> 0:46:22.354
<v Speaker 1>enough and a lot of Australians would prefer to be

0:46:22.514 --> 0:46:25.114
<v Speaker 1>fined then go to the polling station, not because you

0:46:25.194 --> 0:46:27.154
<v Speaker 1>know it's an imposition for them, but that it's literally

0:46:27.234 --> 0:46:29.473
<v Speaker 1>just don't care. And I feel like we should care

0:46:29.554 --> 0:46:31.594
<v Speaker 1>less about politics because they should be getting on with

0:46:31.634 --> 0:46:33.674
<v Speaker 1>the business of just running a freaking country and doing

0:46:33.794 --> 0:46:36.314
<v Speaker 1>right by the citizens of said country. But instead we

0:46:36.434 --> 0:46:39.953
<v Speaker 1>have this big entertainment system now where it's like they're

0:46:39.994 --> 0:46:43.794
<v Speaker 1>outdoing each other with stunts and terrible things, and like

0:46:43.994 --> 0:46:47.194
<v Speaker 1>it's become a different beast now and that's why we

0:46:47.314 --> 0:46:49.554
<v Speaker 1>talk about it so much, because it's lost its beige

0:46:49.594 --> 0:46:52.754
<v Speaker 1>intentions and now it's less about running a country than

0:46:52.834 --> 0:46:53.914
<v Speaker 1>making a statement.

0:46:54.754 --> 0:46:57.194
<v Speaker 2>Claire, I swear this question is relevant. Do you have

0:46:57.234 --> 0:46:57.994
<v Speaker 2>your handbag on you?

0:46:58.514 --> 0:47:01.034
<v Speaker 1>Yes, hang on, it's on the floor. Okay, don't judge me.

0:47:01.074 --> 0:47:01.634
<v Speaker 1>It's a bum bag.

0:47:01.674 --> 0:47:02.354
<v Speaker 2>Oh it's a bum bag.

0:47:02.834 --> 0:47:04.873
<v Speaker 1>A bum bag, but it's a Mimco bum bag. Does

0:47:04.954 --> 0:47:07.034
<v Speaker 1>that make me you were cross body or you were

0:47:07.194 --> 0:47:10.194
<v Speaker 1>as a Yes? Yeah, me too. Sometimes I carried around

0:47:10.194 --> 0:47:11.074
<v Speaker 1>with its little handle.

0:47:11.234 --> 0:47:13.393
<v Speaker 3>I'm not ready to like calf de night it and

0:47:13.434 --> 0:47:15.114
<v Speaker 3>wear it around my I.

0:47:15.394 --> 0:47:17.794
<v Speaker 1>Know I've seen some people do it out in the wild.

0:47:17.954 --> 0:47:19.913
<v Speaker 1>And they look amazing, but it's not me. Claire.

0:47:19.954 --> 0:47:21.714
<v Speaker 2>Can you tell me three things that are in that bag?

0:47:21.954 --> 0:47:23.754
<v Speaker 1>Can tell you that there is a key chain of

0:47:23.794 --> 0:47:26.514
<v Speaker 1>Sylvester hanging off the front of it, which I got it.

0:47:26.674 --> 0:47:27.994
<v Speaker 2>Yep, you've dazzled it.

0:47:28.914 --> 0:47:31.993
<v Speaker 1>I have my foh balm, which I can't say out

0:47:31.994 --> 0:47:33.834
<v Speaker 1>loud because it's a swear word, but it's f off

0:47:33.874 --> 0:47:36.354
<v Speaker 1>herpes because I have a cold sail. Oh, it's not

0:47:36.514 --> 0:47:38.953
<v Speaker 1>very exciting. I have some toothpicks that I stole from

0:47:38.994 --> 0:47:39.514
<v Speaker 1>the restaurant.

0:47:39.834 --> 0:47:42.074
<v Speaker 2>Excuse me, Claire. Can I see in your other hand

0:47:42.114 --> 0:47:43.314
<v Speaker 2>that you're holding a wallet?

0:47:44.914 --> 0:47:45.154
<v Speaker 3>Yes?

0:47:45.434 --> 0:47:46.394
<v Speaker 1>Oh my goodness.

0:47:46.474 --> 0:47:49.994
<v Speaker 2>Okay, this is very interesting because we did an episode,

0:47:50.034 --> 0:47:54.033
<v Speaker 2>a subscriber episode with myself, m Vernon and Holly where

0:47:54.034 --> 0:47:55.393
<v Speaker 2>we went through our bags. We did a What's in

0:47:55.434 --> 0:47:55.714
<v Speaker 2>your back?

0:47:55.834 --> 0:47:56.354
<v Speaker 1>Just surprise?

0:47:56.434 --> 0:47:59.314
<v Speaker 2>They were horrific things we found in there that were

0:47:59.434 --> 0:48:01.714
<v Speaker 2>very embarrassing. But between the three of us, I don't

0:48:01.714 --> 0:48:02.714
<v Speaker 2>think we had a single wallet.

0:48:02.834 --> 0:48:05.474
<v Speaker 1>I not only have one, No, I have.

0:48:09.554 --> 0:48:10.914
<v Speaker 3>Yes. Do you have coins?

0:48:11.754 --> 0:48:14.993
<v Speaker 1>What do you do with them? I sometimes use them

0:48:15.154 --> 0:48:18.194
<v Speaker 1>to pay for goods and services, which their intended purpose?

0:48:19.794 --> 0:48:20.834
<v Speaker 2>This is wild?

0:48:21.834 --> 0:48:23.393
<v Speaker 1>Am I nannying out? Right now?

0:48:23.554 --> 0:48:23.954
<v Speaker 3>Is this? Like?

0:48:24.194 --> 0:48:26.354
<v Speaker 1>Am I in my old Lady era? Is this what happening?

0:48:26.434 --> 0:48:28.794
<v Speaker 1>I don't understand. There's also keysy do you want a

0:48:29.034 --> 0:48:30.834
<v Speaker 1>phone that has pay on it? No?

0:48:30.954 --> 0:48:33.873
<v Speaker 2>But I would love that, But no you don't Apple pay,

0:48:34.234 --> 0:48:36.634
<v Speaker 2>Like do you know? Okay, this is this is a

0:48:36.714 --> 0:48:38.554
<v Speaker 2>whole It is a whole intervention.

0:48:39.034 --> 0:48:40.794
<v Speaker 1>A bank gave me cards to.

0:48:40.874 --> 0:48:43.314
<v Speaker 2>Do that with, Like why do I need to Okay,

0:48:43.354 --> 0:48:45.794
<v Speaker 2>all right, I need an intervention? This is incredible?

0:48:45.874 --> 0:48:46.234
<v Speaker 1>All right?

0:48:46.434 --> 0:48:50.554
<v Speaker 2>On last Thursday Subscribe episode you can listen Claire to

0:48:50.674 --> 0:48:53.514
<v Speaker 2>how the world has moved on from wallets and you

0:48:53.634 --> 0:48:56.994
<v Speaker 2>can also find out the disgusting things we found in

0:48:57.074 --> 0:48:59.554
<v Speaker 2>our bags and they just they reveal some awful, awful

0:48:59.634 --> 0:49:02.873
<v Speaker 2>things about us. There is a link to that episode

0:49:03.154 --> 0:49:06.714
<v Speaker 2>in the show notes. Thank you out louders for joining us,

0:49:06.754 --> 0:49:10.234
<v Speaker 2>and thank you Claire for filling in today. Move over,

0:49:10.354 --> 0:49:12.514
<v Speaker 2>mister Beast. Do any of you guys even know him?

0:49:12.754 --> 0:49:14.074
<v Speaker 2>We don't watch mister Bates.

0:49:14.594 --> 0:49:16.593
<v Speaker 1>I have a small child. Of course, you have taught

0:49:16.594 --> 0:49:17.474
<v Speaker 1>me who mister Beast is.

0:49:17.554 --> 0:49:19.914
<v Speaker 2>Well have they taught you who we are? Claire? Because

0:49:19.954 --> 0:49:21.354
<v Speaker 2>we are on YouTube in a big way?

0:49:21.914 --> 0:49:22.674
<v Speaker 1>Are we YouTuber?

0:49:22.754 --> 0:49:26.114
<v Speaker 2>We're YouTubers, so you can go and watch us on YouTube.

0:49:26.474 --> 0:49:28.634
<v Speaker 2>And I found a comment that I really liked, and

0:49:28.914 --> 0:49:31.274
<v Speaker 2>it was saying that our friend Amelia Lester over here

0:49:31.394 --> 0:49:34.114
<v Speaker 2>looks like Maggie gillenhole. Have you ever had that she does?

0:49:34.834 --> 0:49:37.434
<v Speaker 3>I used to get it constantly, I see him and

0:49:37.554 --> 0:49:40.914
<v Speaker 3>I actually was one time in a shop in Brooklyn

0:49:41.794 --> 0:49:44.314
<v Speaker 3>and guess what happened. My dog will Ganger walked in

0:49:45.234 --> 0:49:47.194
<v Speaker 3>and Maggie and I and we used to look much

0:49:47.274 --> 0:49:48.674
<v Speaker 3>more similar than we do now.

0:49:48.914 --> 0:49:50.794
<v Speaker 1>Did you like? Spider Man me and each other like

0:49:51.114 --> 0:49:52.594
<v Speaker 1>point at each other like you know?

0:49:53.514 --> 0:49:53.914
<v Speaker 5>Are you me?

0:49:54.034 --> 0:49:56.913
<v Speaker 3>Am I? You? You know? There's nothing more pathetic than

0:49:57.034 --> 0:49:59.714
<v Speaker 3>someone who was not a celebrity going up to a

0:49:59.794 --> 0:50:00.754
<v Speaker 3>famous person.

0:50:00.514 --> 0:50:04.034
<v Speaker 1>And saying we look the same. So I chose not

0:50:04.314 --> 0:50:07.993
<v Speaker 1>to draw attention to it. I love that so much.

0:50:08.074 --> 0:50:10.513
<v Speaker 2>Well, if you want to see how much Amelia looks

0:50:10.634 --> 0:50:14.314
<v Speaker 2>like our friend Maggie, you can see us over on YouTube.

0:50:14.714 --> 0:50:16.674
<v Speaker 2>We will be back in your ears tomorrow.

0:50:17.074 --> 0:50:18.473
<v Speaker 1>Bye bye bye.

0:50:24.634 --> 0:50:24.914
<v Speaker 3>Mamma.

0:50:24.994 --> 0:50:28.154
<v Speaker 2>Maya acknowledges the traditional owners of the land on which

0:50:28.234 --> 0:50:29.594
<v Speaker 2>we have recorded this podcast.