1 00:00:08,193 --> 00:00:12,914 Speaker 1: You're listening to a Mom and mea podcast. 2 00:00:16,034 --> 00:00:18,354 Speaker 2: Welcome to Mama out Loud. What women are actually talking 3 00:00:18,393 --> 00:00:21,714 Speaker 2: about on Monday, the tenth of November. I am Jesse Stevens, 4 00:00:21,834 --> 00:00:25,514 Speaker 2: I am Amelia Lester, I'm Claire Murphy. And I don't 5 00:00:25,514 --> 00:00:27,474 Speaker 2: know if you know this, guys, but there's this actress 6 00:00:27,634 --> 00:00:30,594 Speaker 2: who's been really doing a great job on not a 7 00:00:30,594 --> 00:00:35,114 Speaker 2: great job at all acasm called Kim Kardashian. You might 8 00:00:35,114 --> 00:00:35,834 Speaker 2: be across her. 9 00:00:36,314 --> 00:00:39,434 Speaker 1: She's not been doing so well this week. She'd have 10 00:00:39,513 --> 00:00:40,993 Speaker 1: it a bit of a rough time. I think she 11 00:00:41,233 --> 00:00:45,193 Speaker 1: might have just hit failure era. And so I would 12 00:00:45,273 --> 00:00:47,793 Speaker 1: like to just have a moment with you all to 13 00:00:47,833 --> 00:00:50,353 Speaker 1: discuss how a multi up presuming she's a billionaire now 14 00:00:50,473 --> 00:00:53,754 Speaker 1: multimillion billionaire, whatever she is, woman who has a thousand 15 00:00:53,794 --> 00:00:54,994 Speaker 1: businesses is now failing? 16 00:00:55,474 --> 00:01:00,114 Speaker 3: Can you be friends with people who believe very different 17 00:01:00,154 --> 00:01:00,714 Speaker 3: things from you? 18 00:01:00,794 --> 00:01:01,354 Speaker 1: Politically? 19 00:01:01,834 --> 00:01:06,354 Speaker 3: I want to talk about Jennifer Lawrence's answer to that question. 20 00:01:06,674 --> 00:01:12,194 Speaker 2: And did women ruin the workplace? Allegedly they did? I 21 00:01:12,274 --> 00:01:15,234 Speaker 2: knew that we've done, say exactly exactly, in which case 22 00:01:15,274 --> 00:01:16,754 Speaker 2: my question is can we all go home now? 23 00:01:16,834 --> 00:01:18,953 Speaker 1: Yeah? I was feeling guilty at three am the other morning. 24 00:01:19,034 --> 00:01:22,354 Speaker 1: That must have been in first of though. Friends. In 25 00:01:22,354 --> 00:01:25,354 Speaker 1: case you missed it, the VIC government announced their big 26 00:01:25,474 --> 00:01:29,114 Speaker 1: Women's pain report from their inquiry yesterday. I don't know 27 00:01:29,114 --> 00:01:32,554 Speaker 1: if you heard. They announced this pilot initiative to give 28 00:01:32,594 --> 00:01:36,514 Speaker 1: women getting their IUDs inserted the green whistle. And first 29 00:01:36,554 --> 00:01:37,994 Speaker 1: of all, we need to establish who here has had 30 00:01:37,994 --> 00:01:40,874 Speaker 1: a green whistle experience. Jesse Emelia, I don't know what 31 00:01:40,954 --> 00:01:41,314 Speaker 1: that is. 32 00:01:41,554 --> 00:01:45,474 Speaker 2: Oh my goodness, I'm obsessed with green whistles because I desperately. 33 00:01:45,154 --> 00:01:46,594 Speaker 1: Do you have one? When you broke you? Let no. 34 00:01:46,914 --> 00:01:49,314 Speaker 2: I was at the top of a mountain and there 35 00:01:49,354 --> 00:01:51,354 Speaker 2: was a little like lock box where they keep the 36 00:01:51,394 --> 00:01:54,114 Speaker 2: green whistle, and when they looked in there, it hadn't 37 00:01:54,154 --> 00:01:56,714 Speaker 2: been replaced from last time. And in fact, in the 38 00:01:56,754 --> 00:02:00,194 Speaker 2: whole town there was no green whistle. It just didn't exist. 39 00:02:00,274 --> 00:02:03,114 Speaker 2: And so I thought about that green whistle for about 40 00:02:03,154 --> 00:02:04,154 Speaker 2: eight straight hours. 41 00:02:04,434 --> 00:02:05,954 Speaker 1: Okay, well, let me tell you it was the only 42 00:02:05,994 --> 00:02:07,874 Speaker 1: one in the room who's had a green whil experience. 43 00:02:08,353 --> 00:02:11,114 Speaker 1: That it is one of those things. I don't know 44 00:02:11,114 --> 00:02:13,714 Speaker 1: what drug it is, actually, but it's something that's given 45 00:02:13,714 --> 00:02:15,354 Speaker 1: to you in the moment. We have had like an 46 00:02:15,394 --> 00:02:17,754 Speaker 1: extreme pain incident broke your leg. For me, it was 47 00:02:17,794 --> 00:02:20,913 Speaker 1: I snapped my cruci at tendon. It's so that say, 48 00:02:20,914 --> 00:02:23,594 Speaker 1: paramedics can help you deal with the pain whilst they 49 00:02:23,754 --> 00:02:27,674 Speaker 1: transfer you to hospital. So it's short acting, it's very effective, 50 00:02:27,674 --> 00:02:30,074 Speaker 1: so it kicks in really quickly, and I'm not sure 51 00:02:30,114 --> 00:02:32,514 Speaker 1: if it's actually helping with the pain or just your 52 00:02:32,554 --> 00:02:35,754 Speaker 1: brain is now having super super fun and is distracted 53 00:02:35,834 --> 00:02:38,394 Speaker 1: and doesn't care about the pain anymore. Because I went 54 00:02:38,394 --> 00:02:41,434 Speaker 1: from like howling and crying to being like, oh, that's 55 00:02:41,514 --> 00:02:44,394 Speaker 1: a pretty cartoon on the ceiling of the cubicle that 56 00:02:44,434 --> 00:02:46,914 Speaker 1: they landed me in at the hospital. So it's really 57 00:02:46,954 --> 00:02:48,554 Speaker 1: short acting and very effective. 58 00:02:48,674 --> 00:02:52,274 Speaker 3: So it's like a preloaded it's got drugs in a whistle. 59 00:02:51,954 --> 00:02:53,874 Speaker 2: And you just kind of like breathe it in. And 60 00:02:53,914 --> 00:02:57,434 Speaker 2: so it's always like sideline of kids sports, that kind 61 00:02:57,434 --> 00:02:59,234 Speaker 2: of stuff. And I thought when I read this headline, 62 00:02:59,274 --> 00:03:02,554 Speaker 2: I was like, this is genius, because I've interviewed women 63 00:03:02,674 --> 00:03:05,634 Speaker 2: in the past who have said that they got NIUD 64 00:03:05,754 --> 00:03:08,794 Speaker 2: inserted and it was turn out of ten pain. They 65 00:03:09,034 --> 00:03:11,474 Speaker 2: fainted on the train on the way home. Others say 66 00:03:11,714 --> 00:03:14,714 Speaker 2: it was absolutely fine. But the fact that that hasn't 67 00:03:14,794 --> 00:03:18,874 Speaker 2: been part of the process or something that you're off it. 68 00:03:18,994 --> 00:03:20,954 Speaker 2: I've even thought it with I remember the most painful 69 00:03:20,994 --> 00:03:25,074 Speaker 2: part of my labor was the stretcher sweep thing that 70 00:03:25,114 --> 00:03:26,554 Speaker 2: they did, and I was like, can I have a 71 00:03:26,554 --> 00:03:28,274 Speaker 2: green whistle for that? Maybe not, I don't know. It 72 00:03:28,354 --> 00:03:30,314 Speaker 2: might not be good for the baby. But the fact 73 00:03:30,394 --> 00:03:34,954 Speaker 2: that pain relief isn't at the forefront of the practitioner's 74 00:03:34,994 --> 00:03:38,394 Speaker 2: mind when you are going inside someone to a very 75 00:03:38,434 --> 00:03:41,594 Speaker 2: tender area. I think this is very exciting progress. 76 00:03:42,914 --> 00:03:46,394 Speaker 1: Have either of you watched a single episode of All's 77 00:03:46,554 --> 00:03:47,154 Speaker 1: Fair yet? 78 00:03:47,674 --> 00:03:48,074 Speaker 3: Nope? 79 00:03:48,314 --> 00:03:51,594 Speaker 2: No, I have not, But I must say I'm finding 80 00:03:51,634 --> 00:03:55,754 Speaker 2: the reviews very tantalizing. And the more I read, the 81 00:03:55,754 --> 00:03:58,594 Speaker 2: more zero stars I see, the more I'm leaning. 82 00:03:58,474 --> 00:04:02,354 Speaker 1: Oh, guys, you're in for a treat. It is obviously 83 00:04:02,474 --> 00:04:05,434 Speaker 1: Kim Kardashian's lady feature into acting. She's done a few 84 00:04:05,434 --> 00:04:07,674 Speaker 1: gigs before, but this is her latest. It is not 85 00:04:07,754 --> 00:04:11,554 Speaker 1: getting the reviews that we'd perhaps thought when this idea 86 00:04:11,714 --> 00:04:15,514 Speaker 1: was being formed. But maybe it's a little more strategic 87 00:04:15,594 --> 00:04:19,514 Speaker 1: than we thought. But Kim's flop era, we believe may 88 00:04:19,553 --> 00:04:21,914 Speaker 1: have just arrived because she's not just failing where it 89 00:04:21,954 --> 00:04:25,073 Speaker 1: comes to this particular venture. She's also failed in her 90 00:04:25,154 --> 00:04:28,353 Speaker 1: legal career this week as well, so we think maybe 91 00:04:28,393 --> 00:04:30,433 Speaker 1: she's starting to learn a few lessons on this new 92 00:04:30,513 --> 00:04:35,993 Speaker 1: pathway to failure. I am a great connoisseur of terrible things. 93 00:04:36,154 --> 00:04:39,313 Speaker 1: So if someone tells me that something has a bad review, 94 00:04:39,594 --> 00:04:41,954 Speaker 1: I will often like it. And I think it's because 95 00:04:41,993 --> 00:04:44,433 Speaker 1: I have very low brow taste buds, Like I just 96 00:04:44,474 --> 00:04:47,313 Speaker 1: go into these things purely for entertainment value. And so 97 00:04:47,433 --> 00:04:49,753 Speaker 1: this if you are not across All's fair. This is 98 00:04:49,834 --> 00:04:53,193 Speaker 1: the new Ryan Murphy drama. It's about a women only 99 00:04:53,354 --> 00:04:58,833 Speaker 1: divorce lawyers firm, which stars Kim Kardashian, Naomi Watts, Nissi Nash. 100 00:04:58,953 --> 00:05:01,633 Speaker 1: They're like your core three divorce lawyers who've come from 101 00:05:01,633 --> 00:05:04,593 Speaker 1: like this past of you know, middle aged white man 102 00:05:04,674 --> 00:05:07,434 Speaker 1: law firms where they're overlooked and undervalued, and so they 103 00:05:07,474 --> 00:05:10,674 Speaker 1: come out as these powerful women and they drop these 104 00:05:10,714 --> 00:05:16,594 Speaker 1: one liners which are awful, and they deal with cheating 105 00:05:16,753 --> 00:05:20,753 Speaker 1: husbands and controlling men, and like they get the best 106 00:05:20,794 --> 00:05:23,753 Speaker 1: for these women their clients that have you know, been 107 00:05:23,873 --> 00:05:26,394 Speaker 1: very poorly treated. And I can tell you now I'm 108 00:05:26,433 --> 00:05:30,714 Speaker 1: three episodes in the acting is like beyond terrible. I 109 00:05:30,873 --> 00:05:31,594 Speaker 1: don't know. 110 00:05:31,674 --> 00:05:34,753 Speaker 3: Why Naomi Watts and Sarah Paulson, who's also in it 111 00:05:34,794 --> 00:05:37,073 Speaker 3: and has kind of write like Ryan Murphy's News, and 112 00:05:37,193 --> 00:05:37,833 Speaker 3: Glenn Close. 113 00:05:38,313 --> 00:05:39,993 Speaker 1: How can the oh my god, Glenn Close? 114 00:05:40,073 --> 00:05:40,273 Speaker 4: Yeah? 115 00:05:40,274 --> 00:05:43,474 Speaker 3: How can these people be acting badly? They're very good actors. 116 00:05:43,993 --> 00:05:45,873 Speaker 1: It has got to be in the writing. And I 117 00:05:45,953 --> 00:05:47,553 Speaker 1: was trying to find it. Who was in the writer's 118 00:05:47,633 --> 00:05:49,433 Speaker 1: room for this, And as far as I can tell, 119 00:05:49,433 --> 00:05:53,193 Speaker 1: there's not a single woman on the writing style so 120 00:05:53,674 --> 00:05:55,714 Speaker 1: interesting take. I mean, if there is and I've missed it, 121 00:05:55,794 --> 00:05:57,714 Speaker 1: I apologized, But as far as I can tell, there 122 00:05:57,753 --> 00:06:00,713 Speaker 1: was not many women writing this, And so the way 123 00:06:00,794 --> 00:06:03,313 Speaker 1: in which these women have come together, like the friendship 124 00:06:03,354 --> 00:06:05,713 Speaker 1: that's supposed to be like the all encompassing part of 125 00:06:05,753 --> 00:06:09,034 Speaker 1: the backstory of them, feels very forced and uncomfortable. They're 126 00:06:09,034 --> 00:06:11,354 Speaker 1: delivering these one liners like they should have impact, but 127 00:06:11,393 --> 00:06:14,153 Speaker 1: they just seem kind of funny. But the big part 128 00:06:14,193 --> 00:06:18,274 Speaker 1: of it, I think is just it is bougie and classless, 129 00:06:18,393 --> 00:06:21,794 Speaker 1: and there is designer threads and loads of bling and 130 00:06:21,834 --> 00:06:24,234 Speaker 1: it just taps into that part of my brain that 131 00:06:24,393 --> 00:06:27,393 Speaker 1: just loves and it's like going on a roller coaster 132 00:06:27,594 --> 00:06:30,234 Speaker 1: at you know movie world, like you know it's going 133 00:06:30,274 --> 00:06:31,873 Speaker 1: to be awful, bit at the same time, like you're 134 00:06:31,873 --> 00:06:33,914 Speaker 1: adrenaline is pumping and you really love it. Like that's 135 00:06:33,953 --> 00:06:36,594 Speaker 1: all I can say is keeping me coming back because 136 00:06:36,633 --> 00:06:38,313 Speaker 1: the flash in the Glitz is everything. 137 00:06:38,553 --> 00:06:40,833 Speaker 2: What I can't work out is that Kim Kardashian is 138 00:06:41,034 --> 00:06:46,794 Speaker 2: known for her blankness right like, even she is expressionless. 139 00:06:47,154 --> 00:06:50,234 Speaker 2: Her face doesn't really move, she doesn't have any pause, 140 00:06:50,914 --> 00:06:54,474 Speaker 2: she doesn't emote at all. So the pivot into acting 141 00:06:54,594 --> 00:06:57,113 Speaker 2: is a very interesting one for me. But I wanted 142 00:06:57,113 --> 00:06:59,633 Speaker 2: to ask you, Claire. I read this incredible review in 143 00:06:59,674 --> 00:07:01,474 Speaker 2: The Atlantic, and I want to read you a line 144 00:07:01,513 --> 00:07:02,873 Speaker 2: and then I want you to tell me if this 145 00:07:03,034 --> 00:07:05,153 Speaker 2: was your experience of watching it, because I think that 146 00:07:05,193 --> 00:07:09,154 Speaker 2: this also might signify a broad a cultural shift towards 147 00:07:09,674 --> 00:07:13,994 Speaker 2: a very dire place. The author, who is Sophie Gilbert, wrote, 148 00:07:14,274 --> 00:07:17,514 Speaker 2: I can't call it a television show because it isn't one. Rather, 149 00:07:17,594 --> 00:07:21,554 Speaker 2: it's Instagram reels. At episode length, forty five minute collections 150 00:07:21,594 --> 00:07:25,634 Speaker 2: of bedazzled moving images targeted at the idly scrolling second 151 00:07:25,674 --> 00:07:28,754 Speaker 2: screen viewer seems pass quickly, as if to emulate the 152 00:07:28,794 --> 00:07:31,874 Speaker 2: true feed experience. If you're not already on your phone, 153 00:07:31,914 --> 00:07:32,794 Speaker 2: you may as well be. 154 00:07:33,234 --> 00:07:35,514 Speaker 1: Yeah, that seems pretty accurate, to be honest. 155 00:07:36,274 --> 00:07:39,274 Speaker 3: I did see one still from it which was Kim 156 00:07:39,393 --> 00:07:42,874 Speaker 3: wearing a sort of tweed skirt with a believe it's 157 00:07:42,914 --> 00:07:47,114 Speaker 3: called a whale tail, a visible G string poking. 158 00:07:46,714 --> 00:07:47,434 Speaker 1: Out the back. 159 00:07:47,794 --> 00:07:50,034 Speaker 3: I mean, look, I'm not a lawyer, but is that 160 00:07:50,354 --> 00:07:52,033 Speaker 3: to actually wear that to court? 161 00:07:52,434 --> 00:07:55,594 Speaker 1: This show, well, let me just prefers. I'm three episodes 162 00:07:55,594 --> 00:07:57,554 Speaker 1: in and they have yet to go to court. This 163 00:07:57,594 --> 00:08:00,554 Speaker 1: is all boardroom experiences at this point. So this is 164 00:08:00,634 --> 00:08:03,834 Speaker 1: like husband and wife sitting down across the table, very combative, 165 00:08:04,194 --> 00:08:06,153 Speaker 1: like they often come in with a bunch of men 166 00:08:06,194 --> 00:08:08,474 Speaker 1: and they sit down and they say things like oh, 167 00:08:08,874 --> 00:08:11,713 Speaker 1: all the ladies together, like that kind of vibe, and 168 00:08:11,714 --> 00:08:13,554 Speaker 1: then the ladies are like and we are going to 169 00:08:13,634 --> 00:08:16,394 Speaker 1: destroy you, and you're like, yes, girl, go get them. 170 00:08:16,434 --> 00:08:18,914 Speaker 1: And then they deliver these like terrible lines and you're 171 00:08:18,953 --> 00:08:22,274 Speaker 1: like cool, you still want like are really happy for 172 00:08:22,314 --> 00:08:26,114 Speaker 1: your client, but like these storylines are wrapped up in milliseconds. 173 00:08:26,154 --> 00:08:29,033 Speaker 1: You barely get to know the clients. Like Jessica Simpson 174 00:08:29,114 --> 00:08:33,754 Speaker 1: is a client and her role is like exceptional, like exceptional. 175 00:08:33,154 --> 00:08:36,234 Speaker 3: What do you mean by exceptional like she's a great actor. 176 00:08:36,634 --> 00:08:38,714 Speaker 1: No, no, no, nothing to do with her acting experience. 177 00:08:38,994 --> 00:08:40,634 Speaker 1: It is the fact that they brought her in to 178 00:08:40,714 --> 00:08:42,954 Speaker 1: play the character that they have and it kind of 179 00:08:42,994 --> 00:08:47,714 Speaker 1: plays very much into her real life plastic surgery experiences. 180 00:08:48,114 --> 00:08:50,154 Speaker 1: It's just great. And also Glenn Close, like, you cannot 181 00:08:50,154 --> 00:08:52,554 Speaker 1: fault this woman. She's incredible. And she delivers a line 182 00:08:52,594 --> 00:08:55,074 Speaker 1: to Sarah Paulson's character where she says, like the world 183 00:08:55,074 --> 00:08:57,354 Speaker 1: would be so much happier if your mother just swallowed 184 00:08:57,554 --> 00:09:01,514 Speaker 1: And that coming out of Len Close's mouth is like, whoa, 185 00:09:01,554 --> 00:09:06,514 Speaker 1: it's camp and it's terrible, Like it's just awful, awful, terrible. 186 00:09:06,554 --> 00:09:09,594 Speaker 1: But this is from Kim Kardashian American Horror Story because 187 00:09:09,594 --> 00:09:11,634 Speaker 1: she got Rave reviews for that, all right. 188 00:09:11,634 --> 00:09:14,994 Speaker 2: Because I have two theories as to why this has happened, 189 00:09:14,994 --> 00:09:17,954 Speaker 2: because I don't believe in twenty twenty five we are accidentally, 190 00:09:18,154 --> 00:09:22,154 Speaker 2: especially with Ryan Murphy who created Glee, like he is 191 00:09:22,434 --> 00:09:25,954 Speaker 2: a very incredible creator who knows what he's doing, I 192 00:09:25,994 --> 00:09:29,154 Speaker 2: don't believe that this happened by accident. Right, So the 193 00:09:29,194 --> 00:09:31,954 Speaker 2: first theory is one I've seen going around on substack, 194 00:09:32,114 --> 00:09:36,713 Speaker 2: which is Basically, the zero percent rating on Rotten Tomatoes 195 00:09:36,914 --> 00:09:40,034 Speaker 2: is a plant, and it's there on purpose because there 196 00:09:40,114 --> 00:09:42,594 Speaker 2: is nothing that makes you want to watch a show 197 00:09:42,674 --> 00:09:46,314 Speaker 2: more than the thought is it really that bad? Like 198 00:09:46,794 --> 00:09:48,714 Speaker 2: I want to go and prove for myself that this 199 00:09:48,914 --> 00:09:51,514 Speaker 2: is the worst show ever, And that's been part of 200 00:09:51,554 --> 00:09:56,834 Speaker 2: the attraction, and early indications suggests that people are flocking. 201 00:09:57,394 --> 00:10:02,874 Speaker 2: The second thing is that there are seventeen executive producers 202 00:10:02,874 --> 00:10:06,554 Speaker 2: on this show. They're used to it's wild, right, including 203 00:10:06,554 --> 00:10:09,354 Speaker 2: pretty much all of the actors. So you've got what's 204 00:10:09,514 --> 00:10:13,234 Speaker 2: is one? I think Kardashian is one, Paulhan is one, 205 00:10:13,674 --> 00:10:17,154 Speaker 2: And what that means is like decades ago, you'd have 206 00:10:17,194 --> 00:10:19,794 Speaker 2: three or four, So the room of people making decisions 207 00:10:19,834 --> 00:10:20,674 Speaker 2: is quite small. 208 00:10:20,954 --> 00:10:21,114 Speaker 3: Now. 209 00:10:21,154 --> 00:10:24,074 Speaker 2: It's like this flex that every actor sort of wants 210 00:10:24,114 --> 00:10:27,834 Speaker 2: to be an EP as well. And I think we're 211 00:10:27,874 --> 00:10:31,434 Speaker 2: starting to create these vanilla Frankenstein's like where we've got 212 00:10:31,474 --> 00:10:36,034 Speaker 2: too much input that it then just dilutes an idea 213 00:10:36,234 --> 00:10:40,234 Speaker 2: and becomes absolute garbage the next show you're watching. Have 214 00:10:40,314 --> 00:10:44,474 Speaker 2: a look at how many people had creative input, and 215 00:10:44,514 --> 00:10:47,994 Speaker 2: there is a threshold at which there is just too much, 216 00:10:48,034 --> 00:10:50,554 Speaker 2: Like did Kim Kardashian need a seat at the table 217 00:10:51,114 --> 00:10:51,514 Speaker 2: like that. 218 00:10:51,634 --> 00:10:53,634 Speaker 3: I think you're onto something there because and just like 219 00:10:53,674 --> 00:10:57,274 Speaker 3: that had the same issue. It did too the actors 220 00:10:57,314 --> 00:11:00,874 Speaker 3: were executive producers and Rotten Tomatos. For some time now, 221 00:11:00,914 --> 00:11:03,434 Speaker 3: people have been talking about the fact that because it's 222 00:11:03,514 --> 00:11:06,754 Speaker 3: so important, it is getting gained. Yeah, and I don't 223 00:11:06,754 --> 00:11:09,154 Speaker 3: know if you remember this, but about a year ago 224 00:11:09,394 --> 00:11:12,474 Speaker 3: it came out that Paddington iiO had the highest Rotten 225 00:11:12,474 --> 00:11:16,514 Speaker 3: Tomatoes rating of any movie ever, higher than Citizen Kane, 226 00:11:16,514 --> 00:11:20,634 Speaker 3: which is often regarded as the cinematic masterpiece of the 227 00:11:20,674 --> 00:11:23,714 Speaker 3: twentieth century. And you just got to wonder about any 228 00:11:23,834 --> 00:11:25,994 Speaker 3: rating system. I mean, look, I think Paddington Too is 229 00:11:26,034 --> 00:11:29,074 Speaker 3: delightful and Hugh Grant is as usual stealing the show. 230 00:11:29,194 --> 00:11:31,674 Speaker 3: But I just wonder if Paddington two really is the 231 00:11:31,714 --> 00:11:32,794 Speaker 3: best movie of all time. 232 00:11:33,034 --> 00:11:35,314 Speaker 1: So, as I mentioned, well, this is Kim's big fail 233 00:11:35,434 --> 00:11:39,794 Speaker 1: of the moment, but just quietly she failed again this 234 00:11:39,874 --> 00:11:44,474 Speaker 1: week because she didn't pass the bar. And anyone who's 235 00:11:44,474 --> 00:11:46,794 Speaker 1: been watching the Kardashians nose that, like this has been 236 00:11:46,834 --> 00:11:49,194 Speaker 1: a big theme throughout all of the seasons, and she's 237 00:11:49,234 --> 00:11:52,074 Speaker 1: been studying very hard, and she's been working advocating for 238 00:11:52,154 --> 00:11:56,034 Speaker 1: people in prison, and she failed the bar. So this 239 00:11:56,114 --> 00:11:59,314 Speaker 1: feels like Kim Kardashian is failing. In her personal life. 240 00:11:59,434 --> 00:12:01,994 Speaker 1: She's failing. I mean, she can't control the men that 241 00:12:02,074 --> 00:12:03,914 Speaker 1: come into her sphere, so I guess that's out of 242 00:12:03,914 --> 00:12:06,634 Speaker 1: her control. But career wise, like her actual career as 243 00:12:06,634 --> 00:12:10,394 Speaker 1: a lawyer is failing. Her alternate career as an actress, 244 00:12:10,754 --> 00:12:15,314 Speaker 1: she is failing. Are we now witnessing Kim Kardashian's flop era? 245 00:12:15,434 --> 00:12:17,474 Speaker 1: And what can she learn from all of this? We think? 246 00:12:17,474 --> 00:12:19,874 Speaker 1: I mean, she's fine. I love this for her. 247 00:12:19,994 --> 00:12:23,394 Speaker 3: I think this is why she is still just as 248 00:12:23,434 --> 00:12:26,914 Speaker 3: relevant today as she was ten years ago, fifteen years ago. 249 00:12:26,954 --> 00:12:31,154 Speaker 3: It's because she is willing to keep reinventing herself and 250 00:12:31,314 --> 00:12:34,674 Speaker 3: taking risks, and she's failed lots of times. Like I'm 251 00:12:34,674 --> 00:12:37,634 Speaker 3: thinking back to her skincare line that she tried to 252 00:12:37,714 --> 00:12:39,754 Speaker 3: launch a couple of times that never took off, and 253 00:12:39,834 --> 00:12:42,794 Speaker 3: it should have. Skims took off because she got really 254 00:12:42,834 --> 00:12:45,394 Speaker 3: smart people around her and she knew exactly what moment 255 00:12:45,474 --> 00:12:48,474 Speaker 3: she was in. But I love her failing the California Bar. 256 00:12:48,634 --> 00:12:50,994 Speaker 3: Isn't this the second or third time that she's failed? 257 00:12:51,034 --> 00:12:53,314 Speaker 1: At this point, I don't know which bar she's failed, 258 00:12:53,314 --> 00:12:56,314 Speaker 1: becausemember she failed the baby bar last time, and whether 259 00:12:56,354 --> 00:12:58,554 Speaker 1: this is the full fledged one or a retake of 260 00:12:58,554 --> 00:13:00,834 Speaker 1: the baby bar, I'm not sure, but yeah, she has. 261 00:13:00,754 --> 00:13:03,274 Speaker 2: Failed before, so I believe that she has now passed 262 00:13:03,274 --> 00:13:05,354 Speaker 2: the baby bar, but that it was the last time 263 00:13:05,434 --> 00:13:08,194 Speaker 2: she could possibly do it the time that she passed, 264 00:13:08,194 --> 00:13:10,314 Speaker 2: and then she studied really hard with this. She did 265 00:13:10,314 --> 00:13:12,754 Speaker 2: say she relied heavily on chat GPT and she has 266 00:13:12,794 --> 00:13:15,714 Speaker 2: some firm words for chat GPT. She says that sometimes 267 00:13:15,754 --> 00:13:18,754 Speaker 2: it's more like a go girl, believe in yourself, and 268 00:13:18,754 --> 00:13:21,714 Speaker 2: she's like, I just need the answer, which yes, I agree, 269 00:13:21,994 --> 00:13:24,674 Speaker 2: But I think she has entered her flop era. Kim 270 00:13:24,754 --> 00:13:28,314 Speaker 2: Kardashian is nothing if not self aware, and that is 271 00:13:28,314 --> 00:13:31,874 Speaker 2: her superpower. So even her caption on Instagram about the 272 00:13:31,874 --> 00:13:35,514 Speaker 2: All Fairs All's Fair thing, which was like, have you 273 00:13:35,554 --> 00:13:39,194 Speaker 2: guys watched the critically acclaimed All's Fair yet? Like she 274 00:13:39,434 --> 00:13:43,354 Speaker 2: thought that was funny that it was bad and she 275 00:13:43,554 --> 00:13:45,874 Speaker 2: posted about failing. She didn't have to post that she 276 00:13:45,954 --> 00:13:50,314 Speaker 2: failed that exam. But I mean, we all enter flop eras, 277 00:13:50,634 --> 00:13:53,274 Speaker 2: we've got to own them. There is humor in them, 278 00:13:53,634 --> 00:13:55,593 Speaker 2: and all power to Kim Kardashian. 279 00:13:55,834 --> 00:13:58,274 Speaker 1: I think this is amazing because I've had these conversations 280 00:13:58,274 --> 00:14:00,874 Speaker 1: with my daughter very recently, because when I pick her 281 00:14:00,914 --> 00:14:02,554 Speaker 1: up from school, I'd ask her about, you know, tell 282 00:14:02,594 --> 00:14:04,674 Speaker 1: me one thing that happened today, what did you succeed 283 00:14:04,714 --> 00:14:06,833 Speaker 1: at today? And We've had these kind of conversations, and 284 00:14:06,874 --> 00:14:09,074 Speaker 1: then one day I just asked her, did you fail 285 00:14:09,114 --> 00:14:12,554 Speaker 1: at anything today? And she was like, oh, I don't know. 286 00:14:12,714 --> 00:14:14,634 Speaker 1: I don't want to think about that. And then I 287 00:14:14,674 --> 00:14:16,554 Speaker 1: was like, but we learn from that, Like if you 288 00:14:16,594 --> 00:14:19,314 Speaker 1: fail at something, you learn some really big lessons from failing. 289 00:14:19,354 --> 00:14:22,114 Speaker 1: And she was like, oh, And now we have conversations 290 00:14:22,154 --> 00:14:25,154 Speaker 1: about successes and failures, so that as she grows up, 291 00:14:25,154 --> 00:14:26,874 Speaker 1: she's going to be like, Okay, what did I learn 292 00:14:26,954 --> 00:14:29,074 Speaker 1: from that fail rather than oh my god, I failed. 293 00:14:29,114 --> 00:14:31,394 Speaker 1: I'm the worst human in the world, and now I 294 00:14:31,394 --> 00:14:33,474 Speaker 1: can never do that again because I've failed at it 295 00:14:33,514 --> 00:14:36,434 Speaker 1: and I must be terrible. I love talking about failure, 296 00:14:36,634 --> 00:14:38,154 Speaker 1: and I'm like you, Amelia. I think this is a 297 00:14:38,194 --> 00:14:40,914 Speaker 1: really great moment for her because she's embracing it, she 298 00:14:40,994 --> 00:14:44,074 Speaker 1: learns from it, she keeps moving forward, she keeps trying, 299 00:14:44,314 --> 00:14:46,554 Speaker 1: she does things that gets her out of her comfort zone. 300 00:14:46,714 --> 00:14:50,314 Speaker 1: She does something new and different and incredible, and then sure, 301 00:14:50,394 --> 00:14:52,994 Speaker 1: sometimes it succeeds and sometimes it fails. But she's not 302 00:14:53,154 --> 00:14:56,234 Speaker 1: just hanging off of the Kardashian success for the rest 303 00:14:56,274 --> 00:14:58,674 Speaker 1: of her life. It's really quite interesting this time of 304 00:14:58,674 --> 00:14:59,314 Speaker 1: her life. 305 00:14:59,394 --> 00:15:03,194 Speaker 3: I've got another little tidbit of gossip related to the Kardashians, 306 00:15:03,314 --> 00:15:06,874 Speaker 3: and it's about Chris Jenner, who's not failing at anything 307 00:15:07,194 --> 00:15:07,594 Speaker 3: right now. 308 00:15:07,714 --> 00:15:10,914 Speaker 1: She is in whatever the opposite of a floppy era is. 309 00:15:10,954 --> 00:15:13,754 Speaker 3: She's got her brand new face that has been critically acclaimed, 310 00:15:13,874 --> 00:15:17,634 Speaker 3: unlike Kim Show. And she just celebrated her seventieth birthday 311 00:15:17,754 --> 00:15:20,834 Speaker 3: on Friday night in Los Angeles in Beverly Hills at 312 00:15:20,874 --> 00:15:25,634 Speaker 3: Jeff Bezos's mansion, and the guest list was very impressive. 313 00:15:25,874 --> 00:15:30,394 Speaker 3: It was everyone from Mark Zuckerberg to Oprah and Gail 314 00:15:30,674 --> 00:15:34,034 Speaker 3: to Rita Wilson. Tom Hanks's wife is also an actress 315 00:15:34,074 --> 00:15:37,674 Speaker 3: in her own right, to Miranda Kerr and the Snapchat 316 00:15:37,754 --> 00:15:39,034 Speaker 3: guy she's married. 317 00:15:38,674 --> 00:15:40,674 Speaker 1: To, Evan Adele, was there. 318 00:15:40,794 --> 00:15:44,714 Speaker 3: Interestingly, she covered her face with her handbag on the 319 00:15:44,754 --> 00:15:48,314 Speaker 3: way in, which reminded me of remember when Leonardo DiCaprio 320 00:15:48,394 --> 00:15:50,554 Speaker 3: went to the Bezel's wedding and just pulled his hat 321 00:15:50,634 --> 00:15:50,874 Speaker 3: down on. 322 00:15:51,674 --> 00:15:53,914 Speaker 2: I would absolutely go to christ Janna's seventieth and I 323 00:15:53,954 --> 00:15:56,154 Speaker 2: would absolutely hide my face on my way in and 324 00:15:56,194 --> 00:15:58,234 Speaker 2: out because I think the out louders would be, you know, 325 00:15:58,394 --> 00:16:00,554 Speaker 2: probably call me out fairly, but I'd be like, guys, 326 00:16:00,594 --> 00:16:01,434 Speaker 2: I'm there for the gossip. 327 00:16:01,874 --> 00:16:04,634 Speaker 3: But what I found really interesting about this is that 328 00:16:05,354 --> 00:16:08,834 Speaker 3: Chris Jenna was not always Hollywood royalty. In fact, she 329 00:16:09,114 --> 00:16:12,074 Speaker 3: was on the outs in Hollywood all through the twenty tens. 330 00:16:12,114 --> 00:16:15,674 Speaker 3: The Kardashian family was seen as very naff, sort of embarrassing. 331 00:16:15,994 --> 00:16:18,954 Speaker 3: They certainly didn't have any credibility in the sort of 332 00:16:19,034 --> 00:16:22,834 Speaker 3: moneyed halls of Beverly Hills. And now Chris Jenna seems 333 00:16:22,874 --> 00:16:25,794 Speaker 3: to be the queen of Hollywood, and she's bringing together 334 00:16:25,914 --> 00:16:28,554 Speaker 3: not just actors like the Riata Wilson's of the world, 335 00:16:28,594 --> 00:16:31,474 Speaker 3: but also like media moguls like Oprah and then tech 336 00:16:31,554 --> 00:16:35,194 Speaker 3: moguls like Mark Zuckerberg and Jeff Bezos. And my genuine 337 00:16:35,234 --> 00:16:38,434 Speaker 3: question is, how did she pull this off? And why 338 00:16:38,594 --> 00:16:41,554 Speaker 3: does everyone feel that they need to be there at 339 00:16:41,594 --> 00:16:42,954 Speaker 3: Chris Jenna's birthday party? 340 00:16:43,074 --> 00:16:46,714 Speaker 2: I reckon behind the scenes. She must be an incredible networker, right, 341 00:16:46,834 --> 00:16:48,874 Speaker 2: Like she must be one of those people that everyone 342 00:16:49,114 --> 00:16:52,754 Speaker 2: actually quite likes. This happens in like Australian media circles, 343 00:16:52,754 --> 00:16:55,154 Speaker 2: where it's not who you'd expect who were like the 344 00:16:55,194 --> 00:16:58,954 Speaker 2: most connected and almost the most popular. Did I read 345 00:16:58,994 --> 00:17:01,994 Speaker 2: though that Chris Jenna had Harry and Meghan Harry the. 346 00:17:02,034 --> 00:17:04,554 Speaker 3: Duke and Duchess of Sussex were there. But I want 347 00:17:04,554 --> 00:17:07,794 Speaker 3: to just push you on that, Jesse, because we knew 348 00:17:07,834 --> 00:17:09,554 Speaker 3: there were friends, by the way, because Megan had sent 349 00:17:09,634 --> 00:17:12,634 Speaker 3: her Rose when she launched her Rose, so that's when 350 00:17:12,754 --> 00:17:16,594 Speaker 3: that connection first came about. But I want to distinguish 351 00:17:16,594 --> 00:17:19,114 Speaker 3: between someone who's a good networker and someone who's just 352 00:17:19,154 --> 00:17:21,154 Speaker 3: a lot of fun to be around, because that's what 353 00:17:21,194 --> 00:17:23,314 Speaker 3: I'm trying to figure out with her. Do people think 354 00:17:23,314 --> 00:17:25,714 Speaker 3: it's strategic to show up at her party or is 355 00:17:25,714 --> 00:17:28,394 Speaker 3: she just the best fun in Hollywood? Oh? 356 00:17:28,434 --> 00:17:30,354 Speaker 1: I think she might be really fun. I think she 357 00:17:30,434 --> 00:17:32,593 Speaker 1: might be really fun too. But I also feel like 358 00:17:32,914 --> 00:17:37,674 Speaker 1: the Kardashian power has shifted over the years. Remember when 359 00:17:37,994 --> 00:17:40,513 Speaker 1: their power was kind of intangible, like they were famous 360 00:17:40,514 --> 00:17:42,313 Speaker 1: for being famous. There was all of that, and I 361 00:17:42,314 --> 00:17:45,834 Speaker 1: think as we've kind of progressed, and these women have 362 00:17:45,914 --> 00:17:50,034 Speaker 1: become incredibly successful business women in their own right, and 363 00:17:50,314 --> 00:17:52,194 Speaker 1: you know, Chris still at the head of that family 364 00:17:52,194 --> 00:17:54,834 Speaker 1: as their agent and taking care of business, and her 365 00:17:54,874 --> 00:17:57,754 Speaker 1: influence has grown and grown and grown, and I think 366 00:17:58,154 --> 00:17:59,714 Speaker 1: just the nature of the world that we now live 367 00:17:59,714 --> 00:18:02,313 Speaker 1: in that's less about the old money and about the 368 00:18:02,354 --> 00:18:04,834 Speaker 1: old ways and more about the you and the flashy 369 00:18:04,874 --> 00:18:07,674 Speaker 1: and the next and the latest. I think her power 370 00:18:07,754 --> 00:18:09,714 Speaker 1: is actually shifted into a place where I think people 371 00:18:09,994 --> 00:18:12,794 Speaker 1: probably are also networking with her in a way that 372 00:18:12,794 --> 00:18:15,154 Speaker 1: they wouldn't have done ten years ago. I have a 373 00:18:15,154 --> 00:18:19,034 Speaker 1: little piece of gossip about Jeff Bezos. He has a house. 374 00:18:18,834 --> 00:18:21,394 Speaker 3: In Washington, DC, where I used to live, and I 375 00:18:21,474 --> 00:18:23,834 Speaker 3: have a friend who once went to a party at 376 00:18:23,834 --> 00:18:25,273 Speaker 3: his Washington DC mansion. 377 00:18:25,434 --> 00:18:26,794 Speaker 1: And here is the little tidbit. 378 00:18:27,274 --> 00:18:30,194 Speaker 3: He owns two mansions and they're on other sides of 379 00:18:30,234 --> 00:18:32,194 Speaker 3: the street from each other there, and one of the 380 00:18:32,234 --> 00:18:35,114 Speaker 3: mansions is just for parties, and it's full of like 381 00:18:35,274 --> 00:18:39,594 Speaker 3: really historic, pricey memorabilia and beautiful frange pictures and it's 382 00:18:39,634 --> 00:18:43,074 Speaker 3: specifically designed to entertain people and impress people. And then 383 00:18:43,114 --> 00:18:44,914 Speaker 3: on the other side of the Street is his actual 384 00:18:44,914 --> 00:18:46,794 Speaker 3: house that he lives in, And what's the bet that 385 00:18:46,794 --> 00:18:50,634 Speaker 3: that's just got some comfy sofas and some oh some 386 00:18:50,674 --> 00:18:53,794 Speaker 3: big big screen TVs. And I just love the idea 387 00:18:53,834 --> 00:18:56,394 Speaker 3: of a dedicated party house for Jeff Bezos. 388 00:18:56,874 --> 00:19:00,154 Speaker 2: After the break, the New York Times asked a very 389 00:19:00,154 --> 00:19:02,634 Speaker 2: simple question, nothing wrong with asking a question. They just 390 00:19:02,634 --> 00:19:06,714 Speaker 2: wanted to know if women ruined the workplace? And the 391 00:19:06,714 --> 00:19:09,674 Speaker 2: internet got really mad, and we are here to dissect it. 392 00:19:15,634 --> 00:19:20,154 Speaker 2: Did women ruin the workplace? The New York Times? They did, 393 00:19:20,194 --> 00:19:22,674 Speaker 2: and they took the words right out of our mouths. 394 00:19:23,274 --> 00:19:26,474 Speaker 2: They are reading our minds. Last week, the New York 395 00:19:26,474 --> 00:19:29,994 Speaker 2: Times published that headline, and as tends to happen on 396 00:19:30,034 --> 00:19:33,394 Speaker 2: the internet, there was a lot of blowback to the headline. 397 00:19:33,474 --> 00:19:37,114 Speaker 2: I think most people didn't actually read what was beyond it. 398 00:19:37,154 --> 00:19:40,634 Speaker 2: That's not to say the headline isn't offensive or problematic, 399 00:19:40,994 --> 00:19:46,794 Speaker 2: but the article itself was somewhat more complicated, and we'll 400 00:19:46,874 --> 00:19:47,353 Speaker 2: get to that. 401 00:19:47,514 --> 00:19:48,954 Speaker 1: They also changed the headline. 402 00:19:49,074 --> 00:19:51,674 Speaker 2: Oh, they changed the headline like six times. 403 00:19:51,714 --> 00:19:54,594 Speaker 3: So it did start off as did women ruin the Workplace? 404 00:19:54,634 --> 00:19:57,434 Speaker 3: And people were upset, they said, we've heard you. They 405 00:19:57,594 --> 00:20:01,513 Speaker 3: changed it to did liberal feminism ruin the workplace? 406 00:20:01,714 --> 00:20:04,434 Speaker 2: Yes, they kept trying to kind of hedge hedge hedge, 407 00:20:04,434 --> 00:20:06,674 Speaker 2: and you could just hear the panic in the newsroom, 408 00:20:06,754 --> 00:20:11,994 Speaker 2: which a it's quite enjoying. Host Ross Douthat interviewed two 409 00:20:12,114 --> 00:20:16,314 Speaker 2: conservative female writers. One is named Helen Andrews, the other 410 00:20:16,554 --> 00:20:21,114 Speaker 2: is Leah Libresco Sergeant, and they make two very different points, 411 00:20:21,114 --> 00:20:23,834 Speaker 2: but he sits down with them and basically they all 412 00:20:23,914 --> 00:20:28,674 Speaker 2: explore the idea that workplaces have become more woke, and 413 00:20:28,874 --> 00:20:33,874 Speaker 2: wokism is of course a result of the feminization of 414 00:20:34,234 --> 00:20:37,954 Speaker 2: the workplace. So apparently women they care more about this 415 00:20:38,034 --> 00:20:43,394 Speaker 2: equality bullshit. They are more driven by empathy, social justice, priorities, 416 00:20:43,714 --> 00:20:45,593 Speaker 2: consensus over decision making. 417 00:20:45,994 --> 00:20:47,474 Speaker 1: God, we're awful, I know. 418 00:20:47,714 --> 00:20:50,794 Speaker 2: And this shift has meant that we have lost important 419 00:20:50,794 --> 00:20:54,634 Speaker 2: things like hierarchy, assertiveness, and risk taking, which are all 420 00:20:54,754 --> 00:20:59,914 Speaker 2: essential to a thriving workplace. Helen Andrews says that feminine 421 00:21:00,034 --> 00:21:04,033 Speaker 2: vices such as gossip and an inability to deal with 422 00:21:04,074 --> 00:21:06,834 Speaker 2: conflict directly have led to very corrosive things like the 423 00:21:06,874 --> 00:21:07,714 Speaker 2: meter movement. 424 00:21:07,834 --> 00:21:09,074 Speaker 3: Don't get her started on. 425 00:21:08,994 --> 00:21:13,833 Speaker 2: The TV show All's Fair, while in fact, can we 426 00:21:13,874 --> 00:21:17,034 Speaker 2: pin that on men? Because men wrote that they delivered 427 00:21:17,034 --> 00:21:19,553 Speaker 2: the scripts the poor women, which I feel like is 428 00:21:19,554 --> 00:21:21,474 Speaker 2: actually kind of a metaphor for what's going on here. 429 00:21:21,554 --> 00:21:25,354 Speaker 2: But before we go to did women ruin the workplace? 430 00:21:25,394 --> 00:21:28,434 Speaker 2: I want to explore the idea of did women in 431 00:21:28,554 --> 00:21:31,594 Speaker 2: fairness change the workplace? What do you reckon? 432 00:21:32,034 --> 00:21:34,834 Speaker 1: I mean, of course they did, moving from this notion 433 00:21:34,874 --> 00:21:37,434 Speaker 1: that a man's only role in this world is to 434 00:21:37,514 --> 00:21:40,714 Speaker 1: go to work and make money and come home. This 435 00:21:40,994 --> 00:21:43,674 Speaker 1: is an opportunity that I feel men have maybe let 436 00:21:43,714 --> 00:21:46,474 Speaker 1: them pass by, but inviting women into the workplace freed 437 00:21:46,514 --> 00:21:49,954 Speaker 1: them up to have more life than breadwinner. And when 438 00:21:49,994 --> 00:21:53,514 Speaker 1: women came in it of course introduced things like maternity 439 00:21:53,554 --> 00:21:59,714 Speaker 1: leave initiatives. It also created things like workplace discrimination legislation 440 00:21:59,874 --> 00:22:03,994 Speaker 1: came on board, so things definitely changed when women came 441 00:22:03,994 --> 00:22:06,474 Speaker 1: into the workforce. But like I said, men lost an 442 00:22:06,474 --> 00:22:09,634 Speaker 1: opportunity to pull back from the workforce, to not have 443 00:22:09,714 --> 00:22:11,994 Speaker 1: that be their entire identity. And I think this is 444 00:22:12,034 --> 00:22:15,474 Speaker 1: where we're failing men in particular, as no one taught 445 00:22:15,474 --> 00:22:17,874 Speaker 1: them what to do once they weren't the only ones 446 00:22:17,954 --> 00:22:21,154 Speaker 1: doing that important role, and they've kind of been left 447 00:22:21,874 --> 00:22:24,754 Speaker 1: wondering what their purpose is in life now because they 448 00:22:24,834 --> 00:22:26,954 Speaker 1: did not take the on id to say this. Conservative 449 00:22:26,994 --> 00:22:30,434 Speaker 1: men in particular didn't take the opportunity to explore becoming 450 00:22:30,514 --> 00:22:33,954 Speaker 1: better and more involved fathers, or finding ways to better 451 00:22:33,954 --> 00:22:37,394 Speaker 1: their society and community, or you know, looking beyond their 452 00:22:37,394 --> 00:22:39,874 Speaker 1: worth as a dollar sign. Like it's a really interesting 453 00:22:40,474 --> 00:22:45,073 Speaker 1: moment where we could have collectively made everyone's lives different 454 00:22:45,114 --> 00:22:49,314 Speaker 1: and more interesting, and instead, conservative men in particular chose 455 00:22:49,354 --> 00:22:50,074 Speaker 1: to stand still. 456 00:22:50,354 --> 00:22:52,754 Speaker 2: All right, I'm going to play Devil's advocate here because 457 00:22:52,794 --> 00:22:56,434 Speaker 2: I would be lying if I didn't confess that I 458 00:22:56,474 --> 00:23:00,034 Speaker 2: have sat with lots of people who are very high 459 00:23:00,114 --> 00:23:03,234 Speaker 2: up in businesses, who work across lots and lots of 460 00:23:03,234 --> 00:23:06,354 Speaker 2: different industries, young people, older people, lots of different people 461 00:23:06,514 --> 00:23:11,554 Speaker 2: who have said some version of this right when they're 462 00:23:11,594 --> 00:23:13,994 Speaker 2: in private. So they will say something like women are 463 00:23:13,994 --> 00:23:17,514 Speaker 2: harder to manage workplaces with more women are bit here 464 00:23:18,154 --> 00:23:22,594 Speaker 2: they will say women are conflict avoidant, And so what 465 00:23:22,674 --> 00:23:24,354 Speaker 2: you get is a lot of they're not honest with 466 00:23:24,434 --> 00:23:27,553 Speaker 2: each other. We are finding that a lot of this 467 00:23:27,714 --> 00:23:30,513 Speaker 2: social justice stuff is impacting our bottom line. I'm not 468 00:23:30,554 --> 00:23:33,714 Speaker 2: saying I agree with any of this, but like, if 469 00:23:33,754 --> 00:23:37,033 Speaker 2: this is a conversation that is happening, and people are 470 00:23:37,034 --> 00:23:39,874 Speaker 2: going the workplace is changing. And that's the thing is 471 00:23:39,914 --> 00:23:42,394 Speaker 2: that once you get women in, even when the subject 472 00:23:42,434 --> 00:23:45,914 Speaker 2: of minorities, it's like yeah, and those people are going 473 00:23:45,994 --> 00:23:48,674 Speaker 2: to change a workplace. That's also why we want to 474 00:23:48,754 --> 00:23:52,754 Speaker 2: diversify and have a more inclusive workplace. But is that 475 00:23:52,874 --> 00:23:56,513 Speaker 2: worth discussing. I mean, if that is a true phenomenon, yeah, Look. 476 00:23:56,354 --> 00:23:58,234 Speaker 3: I'm going to piggyback on that and say I was 477 00:23:58,234 --> 00:24:01,154 Speaker 3: really interested to listen to this conversation because Helen Andrews 478 00:24:01,194 --> 00:24:04,474 Speaker 3: starts from an accurate place. The place she starts from 479 00:24:04,714 --> 00:24:07,074 Speaker 3: is that we are losing trust in all these affe 480 00:24:07,114 --> 00:24:11,273 Speaker 3: authority figures and institutions that we used to believe and trust. 481 00:24:11,594 --> 00:24:14,273 Speaker 3: So I'd think of government, I'd think of yes, media, 482 00:24:14,714 --> 00:24:17,194 Speaker 3: I think of churches, I'd think of all sorts of 483 00:24:17,274 --> 00:24:20,914 Speaker 3: institutions that are failing us now because we don't trust 484 00:24:20,914 --> 00:24:23,434 Speaker 3: them like we used to. And so her question is why, 485 00:24:23,914 --> 00:24:27,234 Speaker 3: and her answer happens to be women. And you know, 486 00:24:27,594 --> 00:24:29,674 Speaker 3: I think that's what we're spending time unpacking here. But 487 00:24:29,754 --> 00:24:32,754 Speaker 3: it's a reasonable question to ask why did institutions start 488 00:24:32,794 --> 00:24:35,754 Speaker 3: to fail us? And her basic point is that women 489 00:24:35,874 --> 00:24:40,114 Speaker 3: care more about relationships than men, and men care more 490 00:24:40,154 --> 00:24:44,474 Speaker 3: about rules than women do. That's the sort of premise 491 00:24:44,554 --> 00:24:47,354 Speaker 3: of what she's saying here. And I think it's very 492 00:24:47,394 --> 00:24:51,073 Speaker 3: silly to say that men care more about rules than 493 00:24:51,114 --> 00:24:54,634 Speaker 3: women while we're watching the world burn, because a bunch 494 00:24:54,674 --> 00:24:57,914 Speaker 3: of men who are probably at Chris Jenner's birthday party 495 00:24:58,154 --> 00:24:59,754 Speaker 3: don't care about rules at all. 496 00:24:59,954 --> 00:25:03,394 Speaker 2: Her other point is that men are warriors and they 497 00:25:03,434 --> 00:25:07,874 Speaker 2: have been like evolutionarily primed to go to right, so 498 00:25:07,914 --> 00:25:12,434 Speaker 2: they are all about conflict, aggression and resolution. And I'm like, 499 00:25:12,474 --> 00:25:14,514 Speaker 2: I don't know if you've read a story about war, 500 00:25:14,594 --> 00:25:17,513 Speaker 2: but war is not often a story of resolution, Like 501 00:25:17,594 --> 00:25:19,793 Speaker 2: it takes a lot of time and a lot of death. 502 00:25:20,394 --> 00:25:24,434 Speaker 2: And if that is the blueprint of our corporate workforce, 503 00:25:24,514 --> 00:25:26,274 Speaker 2: then I have a few criticians. 504 00:25:26,314 --> 00:25:29,514 Speaker 3: World War One was followed by World War yes exactly. 505 00:25:29,554 --> 00:25:31,394 Speaker 2: I don't think that they all then hold hands and go. 506 00:25:31,474 --> 00:25:34,554 Speaker 2: Now we all agree where she says women obviously their 507 00:25:34,554 --> 00:25:38,114 Speaker 2: only job is to have and look after children, and 508 00:25:38,194 --> 00:25:43,154 Speaker 2: therefore they are more about social dynamics talking. 509 00:25:42,914 --> 00:25:45,114 Speaker 1: Jesse are not being fair about this book that she loves. 510 00:25:45,234 --> 00:25:46,274 Speaker 1: What she says is. 511 00:25:47,234 --> 00:25:50,794 Speaker 3: Then are warriors, meaning they go out and fight battles. 512 00:25:51,274 --> 00:25:56,434 Speaker 3: Women are warriors, meaning they worry about things exactly. 513 00:25:56,994 --> 00:26:00,553 Speaker 2: And what we need is the workforce is best run 514 00:26:01,034 --> 00:26:05,594 Speaker 2: by warriors, which is the war ones. And if you 515 00:26:05,674 --> 00:26:06,434 Speaker 2: can see it. 516 00:26:06,394 --> 00:26:12,274 Speaker 3: Sounds better in an American access, I will say. 517 00:26:10,994 --> 00:26:16,914 Speaker 1: I am just I'm really frustrated obviously at these conversations 518 00:26:16,914 --> 00:26:20,754 Speaker 1: because it's not conversation, it's provocation. And it makes feminism 519 00:26:21,114 --> 00:26:24,554 Speaker 1: this idea that women want to be seen as same 520 00:26:24,954 --> 00:26:27,314 Speaker 1: and it's not that at all. We obviously are different 521 00:26:27,354 --> 00:26:29,394 Speaker 1: to men, like that's not the question, and that was 522 00:26:29,474 --> 00:26:32,594 Speaker 1: never what feminism was about. Feminism is about equality. It's 523 00:26:32,594 --> 00:26:36,514 Speaker 1: about political equality, it's about social equality, it's about economic equality. 524 00:26:36,554 --> 00:26:39,754 Speaker 1: It's not about being the same as men. Women bring 525 00:26:39,794 --> 00:26:42,513 Speaker 1: different things to the table. It doesn't mean they're worse things. 526 00:26:42,714 --> 00:26:44,954 Speaker 1: We are flawed just as men are. We're going to 527 00:26:45,034 --> 00:26:47,714 Speaker 1: make mistakes and do things just as men do. But 528 00:26:47,754 --> 00:26:49,514 Speaker 1: at the end of the day, if we can together 529 00:26:49,594 --> 00:26:53,394 Speaker 1: work together to make it an equal experience, regardless of 530 00:26:53,394 --> 00:26:55,474 Speaker 1: what skills we bring to the table, that is what 531 00:26:55,514 --> 00:26:59,274 Speaker 1: feminism aimed to do. And the problem with the word 532 00:26:59,354 --> 00:27:01,874 Speaker 1: feminism is it has the word feminine in it, and 533 00:27:02,594 --> 00:27:06,234 Speaker 1: men conservative men in particular, see that as lesser. We 534 00:27:06,314 --> 00:27:08,553 Speaker 1: don't want to be that that is a threat to 535 00:27:08,594 --> 00:27:13,634 Speaker 1: my masculinity instead of seeing it as an accompaniment or 536 00:27:13,754 --> 00:27:17,313 Speaker 1: a way to improve yourself is by aligning with that 537 00:27:17,354 --> 00:27:20,714 Speaker 1: femininity and exploring that and seeing how that can work 538 00:27:20,794 --> 00:27:24,674 Speaker 1: better together. Because the patriarchy, yes, started with men who 539 00:27:24,714 --> 00:27:29,434 Speaker 1: will worry yours and who decided that this combatitive nature 540 00:27:29,514 --> 00:27:32,514 Speaker 1: of government and the way that people should be put 541 00:27:32,554 --> 00:27:34,954 Speaker 1: in their place. That's why that was created at a 542 00:27:34,994 --> 00:27:38,354 Speaker 1: time where that difference between men and women was because 543 00:27:38,394 --> 00:27:41,354 Speaker 1: men were physically stronger, and so that was how that 544 00:27:41,434 --> 00:27:43,874 Speaker 1: had to play out in that time. In our existence 545 00:27:43,954 --> 00:27:48,674 Speaker 1: right now, we understand we do jobs that don't require physicality, 546 00:27:48,914 --> 00:27:51,114 Speaker 1: and for that you don't need to be a man 547 00:27:51,274 --> 00:27:54,194 Speaker 1: or a woman or any gender in particular. You can 548 00:27:54,594 --> 00:27:57,874 Speaker 1: actually be the same on the same playing field. But 549 00:27:57,954 --> 00:28:00,634 Speaker 1: you have to understand that that system has to be 550 00:28:00,674 --> 00:28:04,513 Speaker 1: dismantled first. And men are so unwilling to let that 551 00:28:04,634 --> 00:28:06,954 Speaker 1: go because when you're at the top of the food chain, 552 00:28:07,314 --> 00:28:08,914 Speaker 1: why would you want to share that with anyone? 553 00:28:09,114 --> 00:28:11,754 Speaker 2: Well, I think some men are and interestingly here some 554 00:28:11,834 --> 00:28:13,994 Speaker 2: women are right, And there's a question at the end 555 00:28:14,034 --> 00:28:17,354 Speaker 2: of the interview where Helen is asked to name a 556 00:28:17,394 --> 00:28:20,474 Speaker 2: feminine attribute that she thinks is good and she can't 557 00:28:20,514 --> 00:28:23,074 Speaker 2: do it. She can's going back and forth and being 558 00:28:23,354 --> 00:28:26,674 Speaker 2: like she really struggles to go. Is there anything about 559 00:28:26,714 --> 00:28:30,634 Speaker 2: the feminine or female inclusion in the workplace that might 560 00:28:30,754 --> 00:28:33,714 Speaker 2: be read as positive? But I see your point clear 561 00:28:33,794 --> 00:28:36,794 Speaker 2: that it's like it's about the workplace is going to change. 562 00:28:36,794 --> 00:28:38,474 Speaker 2: And if you look at your Jeff Bezos as the 563 00:28:38,514 --> 00:28:42,634 Speaker 2: example of your masculine vices, So let's pillage the environment, 564 00:28:42,874 --> 00:28:46,754 Speaker 2: let's exploit people. Let's money at all costs a certain. 565 00:28:46,634 --> 00:28:49,074 Speaker 3: Pe in water bottles instead of having toilet breaks if 566 00:28:49,074 --> 00:28:50,234 Speaker 3: they work at an Amazon. 567 00:28:49,914 --> 00:28:53,114 Speaker 1: Fashion exactly, and you know what, that is profitable. 568 00:28:53,194 --> 00:28:56,514 Speaker 2: And if that's the world that Helen Andrews is advocating for, 569 00:28:56,834 --> 00:28:59,994 Speaker 2: then you are right. But I think that a lot 570 00:29:00,034 --> 00:29:02,754 Speaker 2: of us men and women are going that's not the 571 00:29:02,834 --> 00:29:06,994 Speaker 2: kind of workplace that's actually functional or sustainable or works 572 00:29:07,114 --> 00:29:07,554 Speaker 2: long term. 573 00:29:07,634 --> 00:29:10,114 Speaker 1: It's really hard for women to pea and water bottles 574 00:29:10,114 --> 00:29:12,794 Speaker 1: really difficult unless you have a shi wi that will 575 00:29:12,794 --> 00:29:13,194 Speaker 1: make things. 576 00:29:14,194 --> 00:29:16,194 Speaker 3: And number two, i'd just say, if you've got a 577 00:29:16,234 --> 00:29:19,474 Speaker 3: party house in a regular house, maybe you should interrogate 578 00:29:19,514 --> 00:29:22,074 Speaker 3: how you're running a business that made that possible exactly. 579 00:29:22,114 --> 00:29:24,674 Speaker 2: Maybe you just need one house there. The female said it, 580 00:29:24,834 --> 00:29:26,794 Speaker 2: I said it, How dad are you? 581 00:29:29,034 --> 00:29:31,754 Speaker 3: If you were born before nineteen ninety seven, I've got 582 00:29:31,754 --> 00:29:33,874 Speaker 3: a few things I want to update you on, and 583 00:29:33,914 --> 00:29:36,594 Speaker 3: if you were born after nineteen ninety seven, I'd suggest 584 00:29:36,634 --> 00:29:37,674 Speaker 3: you should listen along. 585 00:29:37,754 --> 00:29:39,434 Speaker 1: You might learn something. How about that? 586 00:29:40,114 --> 00:29:44,594 Speaker 3: Respect your olders, sorry, respect your elders. The first thing 587 00:29:44,674 --> 00:29:47,394 Speaker 3: I wanted to tell us people born before nineteen ninety 588 00:29:47,394 --> 00:29:49,514 Speaker 3: seven is that I went to an oasis this weekend. 589 00:29:50,754 --> 00:29:53,754 Speaker 3: Oh okay, I went to their concert and it was 590 00:29:53,874 --> 00:29:56,434 Speaker 3: so great well that I had the best time. Holly 591 00:29:56,554 --> 00:29:58,554 Speaker 3: was there too. We were singing our heart out to 592 00:29:58,594 --> 00:30:01,354 Speaker 3: Don't Look Back in Anger. The second thing I want 593 00:30:01,394 --> 00:30:05,194 Speaker 3: to tell you about is that we are apparently doing 594 00:30:05,354 --> 00:30:06,554 Speaker 3: something else wrong. 595 00:30:06,754 --> 00:30:09,594 Speaker 1: Now, can we just add it to the list of things? Okay, 596 00:30:09,634 --> 00:30:12,554 Speaker 1: what are we doing wrong today? Amelia? Millennials go around? 597 00:30:12,554 --> 00:30:14,234 Speaker 1: Because I just found out that we were getting made 598 00:30:14,234 --> 00:30:17,154 Speaker 1: butter for something called the millennial Smile. 599 00:30:17,474 --> 00:30:21,594 Speaker 3: Yeah, so the millennial smile. It's essentially what Tyra Banks 600 00:30:21,594 --> 00:30:23,994 Speaker 3: told us to do when she said to smiles, remember that. 601 00:30:25,034 --> 00:30:27,194 Speaker 1: It's smiling with your eyes, smiling with your eyes. 602 00:30:27,234 --> 00:30:30,274 Speaker 3: Your lips are closed, you're smiling with your eyes, You're 603 00:30:30,274 --> 00:30:32,874 Speaker 3: looking very benevolent about the world. And look, I would 604 00:30:33,034 --> 00:30:36,474 Speaker 3: rather be accused of having the millennial smile than the 605 00:30:36,554 --> 00:30:39,114 Speaker 3: gen z stare. I'm just going to put that out there. 606 00:30:39,674 --> 00:30:43,074 Speaker 3: But also I did feel deeply shamed and guilty when 607 00:30:43,114 --> 00:30:46,994 Speaker 3: I watched this video because I absolutely do the millennial smile, 608 00:30:47,114 --> 00:30:48,314 Speaker 3: particularly in selfies. 609 00:30:48,474 --> 00:30:51,434 Speaker 2: Okay, because what was distinctive about this smile too, is 610 00:30:51,474 --> 00:30:54,514 Speaker 2: that you don't open your lips, right, I like yours. 611 00:30:54,514 --> 00:30:59,394 Speaker 1: First raised up. But it's not dark faced. No, it's 612 00:30:59,394 --> 00:31:01,594 Speaker 1: just like a very gentle like I don't even know 613 00:31:01,634 --> 00:31:02,234 Speaker 1: how to smirk. 614 00:31:03,794 --> 00:31:07,554 Speaker 2: It's how I smiled when I had braces, which was 615 00:31:07,634 --> 00:31:11,194 Speaker 2: like I'm trying to hide my dental work. Now, I 616 00:31:11,194 --> 00:31:13,834 Speaker 2: think because I had braces on my teeth, I was scappy, 617 00:31:13,874 --> 00:31:16,474 Speaker 2: and I had that two years. I feel like now 618 00:31:16,554 --> 00:31:20,034 Speaker 2: I'm still just stoked. I don't have races anymore, so 619 00:31:20,114 --> 00:31:22,794 Speaker 2: I smile with all the teeth. But we had to 620 00:31:22,914 --> 00:31:25,834 Speaker 2: have a smile in our bank for when we took 621 00:31:25,994 --> 00:31:29,914 Speaker 2: our forty eight MySpace photos like an album of our 622 00:31:29,994 --> 00:31:33,114 Speaker 2: night out where we just looked exactly the same at 623 00:31:33,114 --> 00:31:35,754 Speaker 2: the nightclub with our digital camera, where we would do 624 00:31:36,394 --> 00:31:38,314 Speaker 2: that face with our like good angle. 625 00:31:38,434 --> 00:31:40,554 Speaker 3: That's interesting because I've got a slightly different theory ast 626 00:31:40,554 --> 00:31:43,794 Speaker 3: how originated, which is maybe because I'm an elder millennial 627 00:31:43,914 --> 00:31:46,514 Speaker 3: and you are a baby millennial. Yes, that the term 628 00:31:47,274 --> 00:31:51,834 Speaker 3: us elder millennials still remember taking the little camera roll 629 00:31:52,154 --> 00:31:56,754 Speaker 3: to the chemist to get the photos printed. Yes, And 630 00:31:56,794 --> 00:31:58,714 Speaker 3: there was always this moment that you went to pick 631 00:31:58,794 --> 00:32:00,954 Speaker 3: up the photos once they were printed, and your hands 632 00:32:00,954 --> 00:32:03,754 Speaker 3: will practically be shaking as you open this envelope to 633 00:32:03,834 --> 00:32:07,074 Speaker 3: see if amongst the twenty four photos that you had careful, 634 00:32:07,674 --> 00:32:09,874 Speaker 3: there may be one that is good enough for you 635 00:32:09,954 --> 00:32:13,074 Speaker 3: to perhaps frame. Yeah, and you put up on your 636 00:32:13,114 --> 00:32:18,274 Speaker 3: walls venue. And so we didn't have endless, endless opportunities 637 00:32:18,314 --> 00:32:20,994 Speaker 3: to take photos. We only had the photos that we 638 00:32:21,034 --> 00:32:24,074 Speaker 3: had on our twenty four photo role, Okay, And so 639 00:32:24,114 --> 00:32:26,994 Speaker 3: we had to develop a fool proof way of smiling. 640 00:32:27,074 --> 00:32:29,034 Speaker 3: And I see you not in Claire, You know what 641 00:32:29,074 --> 00:32:29,714 Speaker 3: I'm talking about. 642 00:32:29,714 --> 00:32:31,314 Speaker 2: Okay, So we couldn't risk it with teeth. 643 00:32:31,634 --> 00:32:33,794 Speaker 1: Here's what you're saying, we couldn't. We can teek it 644 00:32:33,834 --> 00:32:38,034 Speaker 1: with teeth. Teeth changes everything. And that's the thing. Is 645 00:32:38,074 --> 00:32:40,554 Speaker 1: like when you are looking at your face in a camera, 646 00:32:40,914 --> 00:32:43,674 Speaker 1: like if you don't smile with your teeth, it like 647 00:32:43,834 --> 00:32:46,634 Speaker 1: elongates your cheeks a little bit, and like you don't 648 00:32:46,674 --> 00:32:49,274 Speaker 1: look like a crazy person. And sometimes when you smile 649 00:32:49,314 --> 00:32:51,674 Speaker 1: with all your teeth, it changes the whole shape of 650 00:32:51,714 --> 00:32:54,354 Speaker 1: your face and like it broadens out your cheeks and 651 00:32:54,394 --> 00:32:56,754 Speaker 1: it like changes squints up your eyes a little bit. 652 00:32:56,834 --> 00:32:58,834 Speaker 1: Sometimes you want your eyes to be the focus, not 653 00:32:58,914 --> 00:33:02,314 Speaker 1: the mouth. So it's been practiced in a way that 654 00:33:02,394 --> 00:33:05,594 Speaker 1: you know that if I deliver this photo in a 655 00:33:05,634 --> 00:33:08,514 Speaker 1: certain way, it'll probably turn out kind of okay. The 656 00:33:08,594 --> 00:33:11,714 Speaker 1: smile is unpredictable and it depends on who you're standing 657 00:33:11,794 --> 00:33:14,074 Speaker 1: next to, what angle you're looking at, Like, there's a 658 00:33:14,114 --> 00:33:17,194 Speaker 1: lot of unknowns with a smile. Oh, I've been practicing forever. 659 00:33:17,394 --> 00:33:20,634 Speaker 2: I lose my eyes, Like there are lots of issues. Also, 660 00:33:20,834 --> 00:33:24,914 Speaker 2: my chin scrunches. There is a high probability of error. 661 00:33:24,994 --> 00:33:27,114 Speaker 2: I just wish that I had maybe had this advice 662 00:33:27,194 --> 00:33:27,874 Speaker 2: before my wedding. 663 00:33:27,954 --> 00:33:30,514 Speaker 1: Well, can I just say I went to my niece's 664 00:33:30,554 --> 00:33:34,234 Speaker 1: twenty first birthday very recently, and she had like this 665 00:33:34,394 --> 00:33:38,074 Speaker 1: glorious setup with like draped fabric and candles and like 666 00:33:38,114 --> 00:33:39,874 Speaker 1: things that people were posing in front of to have 667 00:33:39,874 --> 00:33:42,394 Speaker 1: their photos taken. And someone handed me a camera and 668 00:33:42,434 --> 00:33:44,434 Speaker 1: said can you take some photos for us? And I 669 00:33:44,474 --> 00:33:47,394 Speaker 1: was like, of course, I'm cool. I can hang with 670 00:33:47,394 --> 00:33:49,434 Speaker 1: twenty one year olds and take a decent photo. I've 671 00:33:49,434 --> 00:33:50,954 Speaker 1: been doing this for a long time. 672 00:33:51,074 --> 00:33:54,274 Speaker 3: I think that you using the phrase I can hang 673 00:33:54,394 --> 00:33:56,354 Speaker 3: with twenty one year olds was your first. 674 00:33:56,154 --> 00:33:58,594 Speaker 1: I mean internally, yes, but I would never say that 675 00:33:58,634 --> 00:34:00,434 Speaker 1: out loud in front of the young people for fear 676 00:34:00,474 --> 00:34:02,914 Speaker 1: of being judged. But I walked up and I held 677 00:34:02,994 --> 00:34:06,034 Speaker 1: up the camera and before I'd even like gone to press, 678 00:34:06,034 --> 00:34:07,834 Speaker 1: they were like no, no, no, no, no, no, no no, 679 00:34:07,914 --> 00:34:10,553 Speaker 1: this is all wrong. Step back. I now have to 680 00:34:10,554 --> 00:34:13,714 Speaker 1: take the photos from like under boob height. Oh I 681 00:34:13,714 --> 00:34:17,114 Speaker 1: thought of the camera. No no, no, we do not 682 00:34:17,194 --> 00:34:20,194 Speaker 1: take from above. You take from below. And then you 683 00:34:20,234 --> 00:34:23,354 Speaker 1: take forty eight photos speech shots, whatever you want to 684 00:34:23,394 --> 00:34:27,114 Speaker 1: do of them, kind of subtly shifting without smiling, and 685 00:34:27,154 --> 00:34:30,194 Speaker 1: then some with smiles and then some with them on 686 00:34:30,234 --> 00:34:32,074 Speaker 1: the opposite sides. But it's all done from like this 687 00:34:32,194 --> 00:34:34,794 Speaker 1: under boob height, because they want the whole fit in 688 00:34:34,834 --> 00:34:38,274 Speaker 1: the photo. There's no more above shots anymore. That is gone, 689 00:34:38,354 --> 00:34:41,234 Speaker 1: that is out. There's a whole new law coming up 690 00:34:41,274 --> 00:34:44,433 Speaker 1: through the ranks of how to take a photo, when 691 00:34:44,514 --> 00:34:46,514 Speaker 1: is appropriate to take a photo, and what faces you 692 00:34:46,554 --> 00:34:49,074 Speaker 1: pull in that photo. Like these are lessons that I 693 00:34:49,074 --> 00:34:50,274 Speaker 1: am still learning, Claire. 694 00:34:50,434 --> 00:34:53,194 Speaker 3: There might be law, there might be new lessons, but 695 00:34:53,314 --> 00:34:56,674 Speaker 3: all I have to say to my gen z's is yes. 696 00:34:56,914 --> 00:35:00,714 Speaker 3: This weekend I took a millennial smile photo from above 697 00:35:01,114 --> 00:35:06,874 Speaker 3: as a selfie while singing Wonder War, and I regret nothing. 698 00:35:08,194 --> 00:35:08,994 Speaker 1: After the break. 699 00:35:09,234 --> 00:35:12,074 Speaker 3: Do you have any friends who you don't agree with politically, 700 00:35:12,234 --> 00:35:15,033 Speaker 3: maybe even you don't agree with your partner politically. Well, 701 00:35:15,114 --> 00:35:19,154 Speaker 3: Jennifer Lawrence and Sydney Sweeney have some differing theories on 702 00:35:19,194 --> 00:35:19,954 Speaker 3: how you should. 703 00:35:19,754 --> 00:35:20,154 Speaker 1: Deal with that. 704 00:35:21,154 --> 00:35:24,474 Speaker 2: Every Tuesday and Thursday, we drop new segments of Mummyer 705 00:35:24,514 --> 00:35:28,074 Speaker 2: out Loud just for MUMMYA subscribers. Follow the link in 706 00:35:28,114 --> 00:35:30,114 Speaker 2: the show notes to get your daily dose of out 707 00:35:30,114 --> 00:35:32,354 Speaker 2: Loud and a big thank you to all. 708 00:35:32,274 --> 00:35:33,473 Speaker 1: Our current subscribers. 709 00:35:39,194 --> 00:35:42,714 Speaker 3: So I've started getting the newspaper delivered because I'm regressing 710 00:35:42,754 --> 00:35:46,354 Speaker 3: into my old man era, and my. 711 00:35:46,354 --> 00:35:48,634 Speaker 1: Best friend still buys the newspaper, but she buys it 712 00:35:48,634 --> 00:35:51,594 Speaker 1: almost specifically for the TV guide. She's such a nana. 713 00:35:51,634 --> 00:35:52,314 Speaker 1: I don't love it. 714 00:35:52,794 --> 00:35:54,714 Speaker 3: I was reading it on the weekend and I was 715 00:35:54,794 --> 00:35:58,474 Speaker 3: millennial smiling as I turned the pages, modeling healthy reading 716 00:35:58,474 --> 00:35:59,514 Speaker 3: habits for my children. 717 00:35:59,714 --> 00:36:01,874 Speaker 1: Do you sniff your newspaper? No? 718 00:36:01,994 --> 00:36:02,154 Speaker 3: Oh? 719 00:36:02,194 --> 00:36:05,554 Speaker 1: I love, Oh God, the smell of a newspaper. I 720 00:36:05,594 --> 00:36:07,114 Speaker 1: do miss it. Well, I must do that. 721 00:36:07,674 --> 00:36:12,034 Speaker 3: I stopped and I read this survey result that really 722 00:36:12,794 --> 00:36:16,594 Speaker 3: surprised me, shocked me, appalled me. It was a survey 723 00:36:16,634 --> 00:36:20,914 Speaker 3: conducted by McKinnon, an Australian firm, and basically the headline 724 00:36:20,994 --> 00:36:24,394 Speaker 3: is it says that young people are much more likely 725 00:36:24,594 --> 00:36:28,194 Speaker 3: to cut ties in a friendship if someone disagrees with 726 00:36:28,234 --> 00:36:31,593 Speaker 3: them politically. Basically, different political views have become a deal 727 00:36:31,594 --> 00:36:34,274 Speaker 3: breaker for young people. And the stats are quite striking. 728 00:36:34,354 --> 00:36:35,274 Speaker 2: And this was Australian. 729 00:36:35,394 --> 00:36:36,234 Speaker 1: This is Australia. 730 00:36:36,554 --> 00:36:40,314 Speaker 3: One in five eighteen to twenty four year old Australians 731 00:36:40,554 --> 00:36:44,194 Speaker 3: say that different political views are a deal breaker. But 732 00:36:44,314 --> 00:36:46,554 Speaker 3: you compare that to people who over sixty five, and 733 00:36:46,594 --> 00:36:48,274 Speaker 3: that's only one in twenty. 734 00:36:48,074 --> 00:36:50,274 Speaker 1: Say that different political views are a deal breaker. 735 00:36:50,714 --> 00:36:53,873 Speaker 3: And it's interesting because we've been seeing a lot of 736 00:36:53,914 --> 00:36:58,594 Speaker 3: celebrities recently, mostly in the US, being sort of called 737 00:36:58,634 --> 00:37:00,594 Speaker 3: to question about their political. 738 00:37:00,274 --> 00:37:02,154 Speaker 1: Views, and they know. 739 00:37:02,474 --> 00:37:05,274 Speaker 3: I think they know instinctively that this has become the 740 00:37:05,314 --> 00:37:08,434 Speaker 3: third rail, particularly for young people. Like celebrities used to 741 00:37:08,474 --> 00:37:10,953 Speaker 3: be comfortable showing political views with us, but now they 742 00:37:11,034 --> 00:37:14,074 Speaker 3: sense that the vibe has shifted. So, for instance, here's 743 00:37:14,154 --> 00:37:17,754 Speaker 3: Jennifer Lawrence talking about this exact issue recently to The 744 00:37:17,794 --> 00:37:18,514 Speaker 3: New York Times. 745 00:37:18,594 --> 00:37:23,594 Speaker 5: I think I'm in a complicated recalibration because I'm also 746 00:37:23,634 --> 00:37:28,513 Speaker 5: an artist, and I with this temperature and the way 747 00:37:28,514 --> 00:37:32,594 Speaker 5: that things can turn out, I don't want to start 748 00:37:32,634 --> 00:37:36,834 Speaker 5: turning people off to films and too art that could 749 00:37:36,994 --> 00:37:40,994 Speaker 5: change consciousness or change the world because they don't like 750 00:37:41,834 --> 00:37:43,074 Speaker 5: my political opinions. 751 00:37:43,474 --> 00:37:45,834 Speaker 3: Now, look, Jennifer Lawrence, yes, she says she's an artist, 752 00:37:45,874 --> 00:37:47,554 Speaker 3: she's a very good actor. But I think this is 753 00:37:47,594 --> 00:37:51,154 Speaker 3: relevant to everyone right because right now everyone's living in 754 00:37:51,154 --> 00:37:53,834 Speaker 3: this heightened political environment. The temperature is high for all 755 00:37:53,874 --> 00:37:56,393 Speaker 3: of us. We may not be artists, but we are 756 00:37:56,434 --> 00:37:58,754 Speaker 3: still having to figure out how to interact with other 757 00:37:58,794 --> 00:38:02,194 Speaker 3: people who might not agree with us. So Jennifer Lawrence, 758 00:38:02,354 --> 00:38:05,074 Speaker 3: very vocal during Trump one, basically has stepped back and 759 00:38:05,074 --> 00:38:06,953 Speaker 3: said I'm not going to talk about politics now during 760 00:38:07,154 --> 00:38:10,994 Speaker 3: second Shomp administration. So I am curious whether you feel 761 00:38:10,994 --> 00:38:13,914 Speaker 3: this vibe shift too, Jesse. Do you feel like politics 762 00:38:13,914 --> 00:38:15,674 Speaker 3: has become a real no go? 763 00:38:16,354 --> 00:38:18,513 Speaker 2: Yes, And I feel as though there's a shift. I'm 764 00:38:18,554 --> 00:38:23,074 Speaker 2: certainly seeing it among celebrities that they're sort of going. 765 00:38:23,314 --> 00:38:25,114 Speaker 2: I know, it doesn't make a difference, and that's what 766 00:38:25,194 --> 00:38:27,594 Speaker 2: Jennifer Lawrence said, doesn't make a difference when I come 767 00:38:27,594 --> 00:38:29,274 Speaker 2: out and tell you how to It's not like it's 768 00:38:29,274 --> 00:38:32,393 Speaker 2: shifting the needle and suddenly everyone votes for Harris. That's 769 00:38:32,674 --> 00:38:36,274 Speaker 2: simply not what happened. And the second thing is my 770 00:38:36,554 --> 00:38:40,274 Speaker 2: work tells my story, so for a lot of creatives, 771 00:38:40,314 --> 00:38:42,234 Speaker 2: and I think that we put this pressure on a 772 00:38:42,234 --> 00:38:45,714 Speaker 2: lot of different types of artists, whether it's writers or 773 00:38:45,794 --> 00:38:49,873 Speaker 2: journalists or actors or musicians. It's like I have a 774 00:38:49,914 --> 00:38:52,354 Speaker 2: certain set of politics. It might not reveal how I vote, 775 00:38:52,794 --> 00:38:55,594 Speaker 2: but what my values are and what I believe that 776 00:38:55,674 --> 00:38:58,834 Speaker 2: I convey through my work. And I don't owe you 777 00:38:59,674 --> 00:39:02,873 Speaker 2: my ballot card. I don't need to tell you that. 778 00:39:03,114 --> 00:39:06,674 Speaker 2: And in fact, Sidney Sweeney did an interview recently as well, 779 00:39:06,714 --> 00:39:09,914 Speaker 2: which has been widely criticized, but I thought some of 780 00:39:09,954 --> 00:39:13,034 Speaker 2: her answers were actually masterful. And she was asked about this, 781 00:39:13,154 --> 00:39:13,913 Speaker 2: and here's what she said. 782 00:39:14,234 --> 00:39:18,234 Speaker 4: The criticism of the content, which was basically that maybe 783 00:39:18,274 --> 00:39:21,634 Speaker 4: specifically in this political climate, like wait, people shouldn't joke 784 00:39:21,714 --> 00:39:25,354 Speaker 4: about genetic superiority like that was kind of like the 785 00:39:25,394 --> 00:39:28,554 Speaker 4: criticism broadly speaking. And since you were talking about this, 786 00:39:28,594 --> 00:39:30,473 Speaker 4: I just wanted to give you an opportunity to talk 787 00:39:30,514 --> 00:39:31,554 Speaker 4: about that specifically. 788 00:39:32,074 --> 00:39:35,393 Speaker 1: I think that when I have an issue, though, I 789 00:39:35,474 --> 00:39:36,794 Speaker 1: want to speak about people. 790 00:39:36,954 --> 00:39:39,634 Speaker 3: Here the subtext of that they're referring, of course, to 791 00:39:39,714 --> 00:39:40,554 Speaker 3: that American eagle. 792 00:39:40,754 --> 00:39:41,393 Speaker 1: Yeah, she did. 793 00:39:41,594 --> 00:39:45,194 Speaker 3: That. Whole interview with GQ was basically trying to go 794 00:39:45,514 --> 00:39:49,514 Speaker 3: Sydney Sweeney into distancing herself from rumors that she supports 795 00:39:49,554 --> 00:39:53,234 Speaker 3: Donald Trump. The whole interview, it wasn't about her acting. 796 00:39:53,474 --> 00:39:56,034 Speaker 3: It wasn't about even her personal life really, even though 797 00:39:56,074 --> 00:39:58,434 Speaker 3: she is dating Scooter Braun, which is weird. It was 798 00:39:58,634 --> 00:40:01,634 Speaker 3: all about trying to get at whether or not she 799 00:40:01,994 --> 00:40:04,354 Speaker 3: is a Trump supporter, and she was not playing that game. 800 00:40:04,514 --> 00:40:05,074 Speaker 3: And this is the thing. 801 00:40:05,154 --> 00:40:08,393 Speaker 2: She's twenty eight years old, she grew up in a 802 00:40:08,674 --> 00:40:10,954 Speaker 2: red state or whatever, and we all know from Australia 803 00:40:11,034 --> 00:40:13,034 Speaker 2: to the US, pretty much anywhere in the world. You 804 00:40:13,114 --> 00:40:15,234 Speaker 2: know what, the biggest thing that dictates how you voted, 805 00:40:15,434 --> 00:40:18,074 Speaker 2: your post code. That's why I think that even the 806 00:40:18,234 --> 00:40:23,234 Speaker 2: story of how our tolerance for people who vote differently 807 00:40:23,314 --> 00:40:25,634 Speaker 2: to us changes over a lifetime, I think that's a 808 00:40:25,714 --> 00:40:28,234 Speaker 2: story of wisdom. I think that people over sixty five 809 00:40:29,154 --> 00:40:32,274 Speaker 2: know something about having met a lot of different people 810 00:40:32,314 --> 00:40:34,154 Speaker 2: from a lot of different walks of life, and they're 811 00:40:34,234 --> 00:40:37,674 Speaker 2: just more comfortable going. I'd like to align on values 812 00:40:37,714 --> 00:40:39,154 Speaker 2: with you, but that doesn't mean that we have to 813 00:40:39,234 --> 00:40:40,954 Speaker 2: vote the same. Do you agree, Claire? 814 00:40:41,234 --> 00:40:43,114 Speaker 1: Look, I just want to point out that we have 815 00:40:43,234 --> 00:40:47,674 Speaker 1: played grabs from two young white women whose experience in 816 00:40:47,714 --> 00:40:50,953 Speaker 1: the political sphere is very different to say, if they 817 00:40:51,034 --> 00:40:55,234 Speaker 1: were from a minority, and the politics that is current 818 00:40:55,954 --> 00:40:58,834 Speaker 1: affects those people quite deeply, and I feel like it's 819 00:40:58,834 --> 00:41:01,234 Speaker 1: a very privileged place to come from to say I 820 00:41:01,314 --> 00:41:04,754 Speaker 1: will no longer discuss it because in reality, they do 821 00:41:04,914 --> 00:41:06,994 Speaker 1: have a platform. Whether it makes a big difference for 822 00:41:07,154 --> 00:41:08,714 Speaker 1: who people vote for or not, they still have a 823 00:41:08,754 --> 00:41:11,953 Speaker 1: platform on which they can disagree with politics. It hurts people, 824 00:41:12,714 --> 00:41:16,194 Speaker 1: and I think that should be noted. But I come 825 00:41:16,274 --> 00:41:19,034 Speaker 1: from a time as a kid where you never spoke 826 00:41:19,034 --> 00:41:21,834 Speaker 1: about your politics. I very distinctly remember going to my 827 00:41:21,874 --> 00:41:23,913 Speaker 1: local primary school with my mum on election day one 828 00:41:24,034 --> 00:41:26,034 Speaker 1: year and I said to her, like, who did you 829 00:41:26,114 --> 00:41:27,634 Speaker 1: vote for? When she came out, and she said, we 830 00:41:27,674 --> 00:41:30,194 Speaker 1: don't share that information. We don't talk about that. And 831 00:41:30,274 --> 00:41:32,354 Speaker 1: it was very much like politics and religion were no 832 00:41:32,474 --> 00:41:34,714 Speaker 1: go zones when it came to discussing anything with your 833 00:41:34,914 --> 00:41:38,154 Speaker 1: friendship circle, especially around the dinner table. You just didn't 834 00:41:38,314 --> 00:41:41,554 Speaker 1: because it was divisive and because it could end in tears, 835 00:41:41,634 --> 00:41:45,714 Speaker 1: and so you saved your relationships by not discussing those things. 836 00:41:46,114 --> 00:41:48,594 Speaker 1: But I think now we more understand just how much 837 00:41:48,674 --> 00:41:50,914 Speaker 1: politics hurts people. And I think if we are in 838 00:41:50,994 --> 00:41:53,754 Speaker 1: a position to say something, to say something out loud, 839 00:41:53,914 --> 00:41:57,114 Speaker 1: that maybe might make a difference to somebody somewhere. I 840 00:41:57,194 --> 00:42:00,914 Speaker 1: think that's really important to do. But in whether you 841 00:42:00,954 --> 00:42:03,314 Speaker 1: should end a relationship because you think differently from someone, 842 00:42:03,354 --> 00:42:05,594 Speaker 1: I think that is where we're really falling down, because 843 00:42:06,194 --> 00:42:09,914 Speaker 1: we have an opportunityy to burst through people's echo chambers, 844 00:42:10,394 --> 00:42:14,114 Speaker 1: and instead we're fortifying echo chambers for people. So if 845 00:42:14,194 --> 00:42:16,514 Speaker 1: you say to somebody because they believe differently to you 846 00:42:17,154 --> 00:42:19,074 Speaker 1: that you no longer want to spend any time with them. 847 00:42:19,474 --> 00:42:22,554 Speaker 1: They will organically move into spheres of people who are 848 00:42:22,594 --> 00:42:25,274 Speaker 1: more like minded. And all that does is create these 849 00:42:25,354 --> 00:42:28,674 Speaker 1: little loops of people, never busting out of that bubble 850 00:42:28,754 --> 00:42:31,114 Speaker 1: to explore anything outside of the world that they live in. 851 00:42:31,354 --> 00:42:34,954 Speaker 1: So we are doing ourselves a disservice by not allowing discourse. 852 00:42:35,194 --> 00:42:36,834 Speaker 1: We just shut it down and we say we are 853 00:42:36,914 --> 00:42:39,594 Speaker 1: no longer friends, instead of trying to talk things through 854 00:42:39,674 --> 00:42:42,914 Speaker 1: and understand. And that's what we see happening in politics everywhere. 855 00:42:43,394 --> 00:42:46,074 Speaker 1: They have echo chambers in their own party systems, and 856 00:42:46,154 --> 00:42:49,794 Speaker 1: so they don't even consider what's happening outside of that bubble. 857 00:42:49,874 --> 00:42:51,914 Speaker 1: They just automatically shut it down and move forward with 858 00:42:51,994 --> 00:42:54,473 Speaker 1: whatever it is is they're on their agenda for that day. 859 00:42:54,554 --> 00:42:57,594 Speaker 1: So we are creating just more fortified echo chambers from. 860 00:42:57,434 --> 00:43:00,553 Speaker 2: That, including ourselves, right, because we're not allowing our own 861 00:43:00,634 --> 00:43:03,234 Speaker 2: echo chamber to be challenged. But I want to ask 862 00:43:03,314 --> 00:43:06,074 Speaker 2: you on the Sydney thing. So she said, I've always 863 00:43:06,314 --> 00:43:09,553 Speaker 2: believed that I'm not here to tell people what to think. 864 00:43:09,634 --> 00:43:11,954 Speaker 2: I'm just here to open their eyes to different ideas. 865 00:43:11,994 --> 00:43:16,154 Speaker 2: And Jennifer Lawrence sort of said a similar thing, which is, 866 00:43:16,474 --> 00:43:19,594 Speaker 2: I think the focus should be on decision makers, right, 867 00:43:19,794 --> 00:43:23,154 Speaker 2: So when a big thing happens politically, we do see 868 00:43:23,194 --> 00:43:26,114 Speaker 2: a lot of people jump to Taylor Swift say something 869 00:43:26,514 --> 00:43:29,034 Speaker 2: like and I think that that's sometimes easier to run 870 00:43:29,074 --> 00:43:32,114 Speaker 2: to a comment section of even your favorite influencer or 871 00:43:32,234 --> 00:43:35,873 Speaker 2: your favorite musician, rather than lobbying a politician. 872 00:43:36,074 --> 00:43:38,834 Speaker 1: It's because we don't have that direct influence on the 873 00:43:38,914 --> 00:43:42,714 Speaker 1: decision makers. Even though they are elected by us, they 874 00:43:42,994 --> 00:43:46,554 Speaker 1: very rarely listen to us. So when you can reach 875 00:43:46,594 --> 00:43:49,154 Speaker 1: out to a celebrity and be seen in the comment 876 00:43:49,194 --> 00:43:52,674 Speaker 1: section and have maybe a news service pick up your 877 00:43:52,714 --> 00:43:55,314 Speaker 1: comments and have that bit like that feels like you 878 00:43:55,554 --> 00:43:59,154 Speaker 1: actually have some agency in all of this, whereas talking 879 00:43:59,234 --> 00:44:01,554 Speaker 1: to your decision makers, sending an email to some nameless, 880 00:44:01,594 --> 00:44:03,554 Speaker 1: faceless person in a front office that may or may 881 00:44:03,634 --> 00:44:06,554 Speaker 1: never respond to you like it feels very powerless. 882 00:44:06,874 --> 00:44:10,234 Speaker 3: I just feel like you both are talking about celebrities 883 00:44:10,354 --> 00:44:12,754 Speaker 3: like they're different from us in this day age, and 884 00:44:12,914 --> 00:44:15,314 Speaker 3: on this score, I don't think they are. What I 885 00:44:15,434 --> 00:44:18,594 Speaker 3: mean is Jennifer Lawrence and Sydney Sweeney. Yes, they both 886 00:44:18,674 --> 00:44:22,314 Speaker 3: have movies to sell, but all of us have to 887 00:44:22,394 --> 00:44:24,474 Speaker 3: work with other people, have to figure out how we 888 00:44:24,554 --> 00:44:26,754 Speaker 3: get what we want from other people, have to nurture 889 00:44:26,794 --> 00:44:29,314 Speaker 3: relationships with other people, whether they be our fans, or 890 00:44:29,394 --> 00:44:32,994 Speaker 3: our family or our colleagues. And what I found interesting 891 00:44:33,034 --> 00:44:35,594 Speaker 3: about both these women who are sort of we think 892 00:44:35,794 --> 00:44:38,593 Speaker 3: coming from different sides of a political spectrum. We don't 893 00:44:38,674 --> 00:44:40,754 Speaker 3: know that in Sydney Sweeney's case, but we think that 894 00:44:41,314 --> 00:44:43,393 Speaker 3: they've both come to the same conclusion, which is, to 895 00:44:43,474 --> 00:44:46,033 Speaker 3: get what you want from other people in twenty twenty five, 896 00:44:46,314 --> 00:44:50,593 Speaker 3: you cannot talk about politics. And that's what I found 897 00:44:50,674 --> 00:44:53,274 Speaker 3: so relatable about it. Yes, they both talked about their 898 00:44:53,434 --> 00:44:55,634 Speaker 3: art and about their craft, but really that's what it 899 00:44:55,714 --> 00:44:58,473 Speaker 3: comes down to. I think, if you want to get 900 00:44:58,514 --> 00:45:01,714 Speaker 3: what you want from other people without having them shut down, 901 00:45:01,794 --> 00:45:04,514 Speaker 3: without having them cut you off. We've seen the survey results. 902 00:45:04,554 --> 00:45:06,634 Speaker 3: People will cut you off if they think that you 903 00:45:06,714 --> 00:45:09,594 Speaker 3: have different politics to them. Is that a good situation 904 00:45:09,794 --> 00:45:11,594 Speaker 3: to be in? Maybe it's just a return to what 905 00:45:11,714 --> 00:45:13,554 Speaker 3: you were saying, Claire. In the olden days, there was 906 00:45:13,634 --> 00:45:16,354 Speaker 3: the conventional wisdom you didn't talk about politics, and then 907 00:45:16,394 --> 00:45:18,873 Speaker 3: we had this moment for a few decades where that 908 00:45:19,074 --> 00:45:21,394 Speaker 3: was seen as perfectly fine fault of the conversation. 909 00:45:21,634 --> 00:45:23,754 Speaker 2: I think that that's a good point, Amelia, that it's like, 910 00:45:24,554 --> 00:45:28,314 Speaker 2: have we returned to a family Christmas? We will not 911 00:45:28,394 --> 00:45:31,354 Speaker 2: talk about it around the dinner table, we wint I'm 912 00:45:31,434 --> 00:45:31,913 Speaker 2: sensing that. 913 00:45:31,954 --> 00:45:32,354 Speaker 1: A little bit. 914 00:45:32,474 --> 00:45:35,314 Speaker 3: I mean, Australia invented the secret ballot. We have always 915 00:45:35,354 --> 00:45:38,553 Speaker 3: been at people who is reluctant to share our political views, 916 00:45:38,634 --> 00:45:42,074 Speaker 3: certainly compared to our friendzy Americans who when you register 917 00:45:42,154 --> 00:45:44,434 Speaker 3: to vote, that you register to vote with a particular 918 00:45:44,554 --> 00:45:46,914 Speaker 3: party and you can look up anyone's party affiliation. 919 00:45:47,114 --> 00:45:48,513 Speaker 1: That is not the Australian way. 920 00:45:48,994 --> 00:45:52,274 Speaker 3: But I'm wondering if the last couple of decades of 921 00:45:52,554 --> 00:45:55,274 Speaker 3: everyone talking about politics all the time was just an 922 00:45:55,274 --> 00:45:58,393 Speaker 3: anomaly and was maybe just bad manners. Maybe we do 923 00:45:58,674 --> 00:46:00,754 Speaker 3: just need to regress to what our grandmothers told us, 924 00:46:00,754 --> 00:46:02,594 Speaker 3: which is do not talk about politics. 925 00:46:02,954 --> 00:46:04,473 Speaker 1: I would like to go back to a time where 926 00:46:04,554 --> 00:46:09,674 Speaker 1: politics wasn't such an atainment like it felt like back 927 00:46:09,714 --> 00:46:12,513 Speaker 1: in the day, politicians were beige and they did beij 928 00:46:12,634 --> 00:46:16,754 Speaker 1: things like make policy decisions and try to balance budgets 929 00:46:16,834 --> 00:46:18,913 Speaker 1: like it was beije as hell, and we didn't care 930 00:46:19,074 --> 00:46:22,354 Speaker 1: enough and a lot of Australians would prefer to be 931 00:46:22,514 --> 00:46:25,114 Speaker 1: fined then go to the polling station, not because you 932 00:46:25,194 --> 00:46:27,154 Speaker 1: know it's an imposition for them, but that it's literally 933 00:46:27,234 --> 00:46:29,473 Speaker 1: just don't care. And I feel like we should care 934 00:46:29,554 --> 00:46:31,594 Speaker 1: less about politics because they should be getting on with 935 00:46:31,634 --> 00:46:33,674 Speaker 1: the business of just running a freaking country and doing 936 00:46:33,794 --> 00:46:36,314 Speaker 1: right by the citizens of said country. But instead we 937 00:46:36,434 --> 00:46:39,953 Speaker 1: have this big entertainment system now where it's like they're 938 00:46:39,994 --> 00:46:43,794 Speaker 1: outdoing each other with stunts and terrible things, and like 939 00:46:43,994 --> 00:46:47,194 Speaker 1: it's become a different beast now and that's why we 940 00:46:47,314 --> 00:46:49,554 Speaker 1: talk about it so much, because it's lost its beige 941 00:46:49,594 --> 00:46:52,754 Speaker 1: intentions and now it's less about running a country than 942 00:46:52,834 --> 00:46:53,914 Speaker 1: making a statement. 943 00:46:54,754 --> 00:46:57,194 Speaker 2: Claire, I swear this question is relevant. Do you have 944 00:46:57,234 --> 00:46:57,994 Speaker 2: your handbag on you? 945 00:46:58,514 --> 00:47:01,034 Speaker 1: Yes, hang on, it's on the floor. Okay, don't judge me. 946 00:47:01,074 --> 00:47:01,634 Speaker 1: It's a bum bag. 947 00:47:01,674 --> 00:47:02,354 Speaker 2: Oh it's a bum bag. 948 00:47:02,834 --> 00:47:04,873 Speaker 1: A bum bag, but it's a Mimco bum bag. Does 949 00:47:04,954 --> 00:47:07,034 Speaker 1: that make me you were cross body or you were 950 00:47:07,194 --> 00:47:10,194 Speaker 1: as a Yes? Yeah, me too. Sometimes I carried around 951 00:47:10,194 --> 00:47:11,074 Speaker 1: with its little handle. 952 00:47:11,234 --> 00:47:13,393 Speaker 3: I'm not ready to like calf de night it and 953 00:47:13,434 --> 00:47:15,114 Speaker 3: wear it around my I. 954 00:47:15,394 --> 00:47:17,794 Speaker 1: Know I've seen some people do it out in the wild. 955 00:47:17,954 --> 00:47:19,913 Speaker 1: And they look amazing, but it's not me. Claire. 956 00:47:19,954 --> 00:47:21,714 Speaker 2: Can you tell me three things that are in that bag? 957 00:47:21,954 --> 00:47:23,754 Speaker 1: Can tell you that there is a key chain of 958 00:47:23,794 --> 00:47:26,514 Speaker 1: Sylvester hanging off the front of it, which I got it. 959 00:47:26,674 --> 00:47:27,994 Speaker 2: Yep, you've dazzled it. 960 00:47:28,914 --> 00:47:31,993 Speaker 1: I have my foh balm, which I can't say out 961 00:47:31,994 --> 00:47:33,834 Speaker 1: loud because it's a swear word, but it's f off 962 00:47:33,874 --> 00:47:36,354 Speaker 1: herpes because I have a cold sail. Oh, it's not 963 00:47:36,514 --> 00:47:38,953 Speaker 1: very exciting. I have some toothpicks that I stole from 964 00:47:38,994 --> 00:47:39,514 Speaker 1: the restaurant. 965 00:47:39,834 --> 00:47:42,074 Speaker 2: Excuse me, Claire. Can I see in your other hand 966 00:47:42,114 --> 00:47:43,314 Speaker 2: that you're holding a wallet? 967 00:47:44,914 --> 00:47:45,154 Speaker 3: Yes? 968 00:47:45,434 --> 00:47:46,394 Speaker 1: Oh my goodness. 969 00:47:46,474 --> 00:47:49,994 Speaker 2: Okay, this is very interesting because we did an episode, 970 00:47:50,034 --> 00:47:54,033 Speaker 2: a subscriber episode with myself, m Vernon and Holly where 971 00:47:54,034 --> 00:47:55,393 Speaker 2: we went through our bags. We did a What's in 972 00:47:55,434 --> 00:47:55,714 Speaker 2: your back? 973 00:47:55,834 --> 00:47:56,354 Speaker 1: Just surprise? 974 00:47:56,434 --> 00:47:59,314 Speaker 2: They were horrific things we found in there that were 975 00:47:59,434 --> 00:48:01,714 Speaker 2: very embarrassing. But between the three of us, I don't 976 00:48:01,714 --> 00:48:02,714 Speaker 2: think we had a single wallet. 977 00:48:02,834 --> 00:48:05,474 Speaker 1: I not only have one, No, I have. 978 00:48:09,554 --> 00:48:10,914 Speaker 3: Yes. Do you have coins? 979 00:48:11,754 --> 00:48:14,993 Speaker 1: What do you do with them? I sometimes use them 980 00:48:15,154 --> 00:48:18,194 Speaker 1: to pay for goods and services, which their intended purpose? 981 00:48:19,794 --> 00:48:20,834 Speaker 2: This is wild? 982 00:48:21,834 --> 00:48:23,393 Speaker 1: Am I nannying out? Right now? 983 00:48:23,554 --> 00:48:23,954 Speaker 3: Is this? Like? 984 00:48:24,194 --> 00:48:26,354 Speaker 1: Am I in my old Lady era? Is this what happening? 985 00:48:26,434 --> 00:48:28,794 Speaker 1: I don't understand. There's also keysy do you want a 986 00:48:29,034 --> 00:48:30,834 Speaker 1: phone that has pay on it? No? 987 00:48:30,954 --> 00:48:33,873 Speaker 2: But I would love that, But no you don't Apple pay, 988 00:48:34,234 --> 00:48:36,634 Speaker 2: Like do you know? Okay, this is this is a 989 00:48:36,714 --> 00:48:38,554 Speaker 2: whole It is a whole intervention. 990 00:48:39,034 --> 00:48:40,794 Speaker 1: A bank gave me cards to. 991 00:48:40,874 --> 00:48:43,314 Speaker 2: Do that with, Like why do I need to Okay, 992 00:48:43,354 --> 00:48:45,794 Speaker 2: all right, I need an intervention? This is incredible? 993 00:48:45,874 --> 00:48:46,234 Speaker 1: All right? 994 00:48:46,434 --> 00:48:50,554 Speaker 2: On last Thursday Subscribe episode you can listen Claire to 995 00:48:50,674 --> 00:48:53,514 Speaker 2: how the world has moved on from wallets and you 996 00:48:53,634 --> 00:48:56,994 Speaker 2: can also find out the disgusting things we found in 997 00:48:57,074 --> 00:48:59,554 Speaker 2: our bags and they just they reveal some awful, awful 998 00:48:59,634 --> 00:49:02,873 Speaker 2: things about us. There is a link to that episode 999 00:49:03,154 --> 00:49:06,714 Speaker 2: in the show notes. Thank you out louders for joining us, 1000 00:49:06,754 --> 00:49:10,234 Speaker 2: and thank you Claire for filling in today. Move over, 1001 00:49:10,354 --> 00:49:12,514 Speaker 2: mister Beast. Do any of you guys even know him? 1002 00:49:12,754 --> 00:49:14,074 Speaker 2: We don't watch mister Bates. 1003 00:49:14,594 --> 00:49:16,593 Speaker 1: I have a small child. Of course, you have taught 1004 00:49:16,594 --> 00:49:17,474 Speaker 1: me who mister Beast is. 1005 00:49:17,554 --> 00:49:19,914 Speaker 2: Well have they taught you who we are? Claire? Because 1006 00:49:19,954 --> 00:49:21,354 Speaker 2: we are on YouTube in a big way? 1007 00:49:21,914 --> 00:49:22,674 Speaker 1: Are we YouTuber? 1008 00:49:22,754 --> 00:49:26,114 Speaker 2: We're YouTubers, so you can go and watch us on YouTube. 1009 00:49:26,474 --> 00:49:28,634 Speaker 2: And I found a comment that I really liked, and 1010 00:49:28,914 --> 00:49:31,274 Speaker 2: it was saying that our friend Amelia Lester over here 1011 00:49:31,394 --> 00:49:34,114 Speaker 2: looks like Maggie gillenhole. Have you ever had that she does? 1012 00:49:34,834 --> 00:49:37,434 Speaker 3: I used to get it constantly, I see him and 1013 00:49:37,554 --> 00:49:40,914 Speaker 3: I actually was one time in a shop in Brooklyn 1014 00:49:41,794 --> 00:49:44,314 Speaker 3: and guess what happened. My dog will Ganger walked in 1015 00:49:45,234 --> 00:49:47,194 Speaker 3: and Maggie and I and we used to look much 1016 00:49:47,274 --> 00:49:48,674 Speaker 3: more similar than we do now. 1017 00:49:48,914 --> 00:49:50,794 Speaker 1: Did you like? Spider Man me and each other like 1018 00:49:51,114 --> 00:49:52,594 Speaker 1: point at each other like you know? 1019 00:49:53,514 --> 00:49:53,914 Speaker 5: Are you me? 1020 00:49:54,034 --> 00:49:56,913 Speaker 3: Am I? You? You know? There's nothing more pathetic than 1021 00:49:57,034 --> 00:49:59,714 Speaker 3: someone who was not a celebrity going up to a 1022 00:49:59,794 --> 00:50:00,754 Speaker 3: famous person. 1023 00:50:00,514 --> 00:50:04,034 Speaker 1: And saying we look the same. So I chose not 1024 00:50:04,314 --> 00:50:07,993 Speaker 1: to draw attention to it. I love that so much. 1025 00:50:08,074 --> 00:50:10,513 Speaker 2: Well, if you want to see how much Amelia looks 1026 00:50:10,634 --> 00:50:14,314 Speaker 2: like our friend Maggie, you can see us over on YouTube. 1027 00:50:14,714 --> 00:50:16,674 Speaker 2: We will be back in your ears tomorrow. 1028 00:50:17,074 --> 00:50:18,473 Speaker 1: Bye bye bye. 1029 00:50:24,634 --> 00:50:24,914 Speaker 3: Mamma. 1030 00:50:24,994 --> 00:50:28,154 Speaker 2: Maya acknowledges the traditional owners of the land on which 1031 00:50:28,234 --> 00:50:29,594 Speaker 2: we have recorded this podcast.