WEBVTT - The Meghan Masterchef Theory & A Very Public Family Performance Review

0:00:03.080 --> 0:00:06.400
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to Mama Mia out loud. It's what

0:00:06.440 --> 0:00:09.360
<v Speaker 1>women are actually talking about on Monday, the twenty seventh

0:00:09.400 --> 0:00:09.799
<v Speaker 1>of July.

0:00:10.200 --> 0:00:11.440
<v Speaker 2>My name is Holly Waynwright.

0:00:11.600 --> 0:00:13.560
<v Speaker 3>I'm m Burnham, I'm Amelia Lester.

0:00:14.200 --> 0:00:16.279
<v Speaker 2>I have not yet bullied my way into MC.

0:00:16.560 --> 0:00:19.400
<v Speaker 3>I know I can see you eyeing it when the studio.

0:00:19.160 --> 0:00:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Out louders if you don't know what I'm talking about.

0:00:21.040 --> 0:00:23.079
<v Speaker 1>This is Friday's show. We'll get there.

0:00:23.360 --> 0:00:26.800
<v Speaker 2>But in the meantime, here's what's on our agenda for today.

0:00:27.640 --> 0:00:30.800
<v Speaker 1>How not to be a shit guest by a Hollywood

0:00:30.840 --> 0:00:34.120
<v Speaker 1>star who's had enough of ungrateful visitors.

0:00:33.920 --> 0:00:37.280
<v Speaker 3>Plus a less celebrities now have a new type of

0:00:37.520 --> 0:00:40.200
<v Speaker 3>love interests and they're just like us after all.

0:00:40.400 --> 0:00:42.920
<v Speaker 4>And you've heard what Pauline Hanson had to say about

0:00:42.920 --> 0:00:46.279
<v Speaker 4>domestic violence. We want to talk about why she said it.

0:00:46.840 --> 0:00:51.080
<v Speaker 3>But first, in case you missed it, Megan Markle was

0:00:51.120 --> 0:00:53.920
<v Speaker 3>on Master Chef last night. Did you guys hear them?

0:00:53.920 --> 0:00:56.440
<v Speaker 4>No? I need to hear everything about you think I

0:00:56.520 --> 0:00:56.880
<v Speaker 4>missed it?

0:00:57.400 --> 0:00:58.680
<v Speaker 2>Do you think I missed it?

0:00:58.720 --> 0:00:58.880
<v Speaker 5>Ever?

0:00:58.960 --> 0:00:59.280
<v Speaker 4>Liverit?

0:00:59.520 --> 0:01:01.400
<v Speaker 3>I knew you would watch the episode. I mean I

0:01:01.400 --> 0:01:03.640
<v Speaker 3>feel like it was all I can't believe. I didn't

0:01:03.640 --> 0:01:05.000
<v Speaker 3>watch it because it was the only thing I was

0:01:05.000 --> 0:01:07.319
<v Speaker 3>hearing about for the last three months when they were

0:01:07.360 --> 0:01:10.560
<v Speaker 3>here in April. But I did see a lot of

0:01:10.800 --> 0:01:16.200
<v Speaker 3>like reporting, alleged reporting of her behind the scenes in

0:01:16.440 --> 0:01:19.320
<v Speaker 3>a feud. Oh my god, stop it. Can you give

0:01:19.400 --> 0:01:20.759
<v Speaker 3>us a little download what happened?

0:01:20.800 --> 0:01:21.119
<v Speaker 4>Please?

0:01:21.560 --> 0:01:24.160
<v Speaker 1>So it wasn't a surprise that she was on, as

0:01:24.160 --> 0:01:25.959
<v Speaker 1>you say, because I think they decided there was no

0:01:26.000 --> 0:01:28.160
<v Speaker 1>way they could hold this leak and that when they

0:01:28.160 --> 0:01:31.360
<v Speaker 1>were here in April and Megan was doing that big

0:01:31.400 --> 0:01:34.039
<v Speaker 1>event in Kuji for Besties, and Harry was doing his

0:01:34.160 --> 0:01:38.640
<v Speaker 1>sort of faux royal business. He was in Canberra with

0:01:38.720 --> 0:01:42.720
<v Speaker 1>the veterans, and she went to the Master Chef studio

0:01:43.120 --> 0:01:45.040
<v Speaker 1>and filmed a guest episode.

0:01:45.160 --> 0:01:48.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, which I feel like is so her. We've seen

0:01:48.080 --> 0:01:50.720
<v Speaker 3>the Netflix show. She likes to cook, she likes to present.

0:01:51.040 --> 0:01:53.840
<v Speaker 1>They put her in context. The feud was supposed to

0:01:53.880 --> 0:01:56.160
<v Speaker 1>be about this that you're about to hear, which is

0:01:56.160 --> 0:02:00.960
<v Speaker 1>the intro that Poe, the amazing Poe did introducing Megan.

0:02:01.000 --> 0:02:03.440
<v Speaker 1>I have to say, so picture this if you haven't

0:02:03.440 --> 0:02:07.000
<v Speaker 1>watched it. The set was all fancy red car pits, chandeliers,

0:02:07.040 --> 0:02:10.920
<v Speaker 1>fresh flowers everywhere, red velvet, and they had before this happened,

0:02:10.919 --> 0:02:14.799
<v Speaker 1>they had some of the contestants going, oh, there must

0:02:14.840 --> 0:02:18.000
<v Speaker 1>be someone really special coming today because everything looks really amazing.

0:02:18.080 --> 0:02:20.440
<v Speaker 3>It kind of reminds me of like the Bachelor setup

0:02:20.480 --> 0:02:22.360
<v Speaker 3>when you're meeting the women and he's standing there on

0:02:22.400 --> 0:02:23.560
<v Speaker 3>the red carpet waiting for them.

0:02:23.680 --> 0:02:28.639
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and then Poe said this. She is a.

0:02:28.600 --> 0:02:38.360
<v Speaker 5>Global icon, a philanthropist, a humanitarian, a woman known around

0:02:38.400 --> 0:02:42.160
<v Speaker 5>the world for her heart, her voice, and her deep

0:02:42.240 --> 0:02:47.200
<v Speaker 5>love of home cooking with her own lifestyle brand that

0:02:47.320 --> 0:02:56.560
<v Speaker 5>includes gifting and beautiful artismal food products all the way

0:02:56.800 --> 0:03:05.160
<v Speaker 5>from sunny California. Please welcome to MasterChef Australia, the Duchess

0:03:05.280 --> 0:03:06.040
<v Speaker 5>of Sussex.

0:03:06.480 --> 0:03:20.280
<v Speaker 4>Oh my god, no, Meghan not. But she said, Meghan Mark.

0:03:21.600 --> 0:03:24.959
<v Speaker 1>The whuha has been entirely confected. Let's put it that way, right,

0:03:25.000 --> 0:03:27.680
<v Speaker 1>because some of the headlines were that Poe and Meghan

0:03:27.760 --> 0:03:31.200
<v Speaker 1>were feuding because earlier in that she said during the intro,

0:03:31.280 --> 0:03:34.600
<v Speaker 1>she said something like she's royally good or whatever.

0:03:34.639 --> 0:03:35.840
<v Speaker 2>She said the word royally and.

0:03:35.760 --> 0:03:37.720
<v Speaker 1>They were saying, oh, no, no, no, Meghan doesn't want

0:03:37.720 --> 0:03:40.560
<v Speaker 1>to be referred to as royal. Let's be clear, every

0:03:40.600 --> 0:03:43.160
<v Speaker 1>word of that intro would have been approved. But Master

0:03:43.200 --> 0:03:45.200
<v Speaker 1>Chef isn't live, you know what I mean? As if

0:03:45.240 --> 0:03:47.760
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't go out live, they could have stopped and

0:03:47.800 --> 0:03:49.120
<v Speaker 1>done that again and again and again.

0:03:49.320 --> 0:03:52.960
<v Speaker 4>There do that again, Holly, did you hear it.

0:03:54.720 --> 0:03:54.960
<v Speaker 5>Again?

0:03:55.320 --> 0:03:57.720
<v Speaker 1>Well, all I'm saying is that I don't think that

0:03:57.800 --> 0:03:59.800
<v Speaker 1>any of the words said there were a surprise.

0:04:00.120 --> 0:04:00.400
<v Speaker 2>Megan.

0:04:00.680 --> 0:04:03.760
<v Speaker 4>You think she actually okayed Meghan Mikael.

0:04:04.160 --> 0:04:05.040
<v Speaker 2>I think she did.

0:04:05.120 --> 0:04:07.840
<v Speaker 3>That's not fair because in her Netflix show when she

0:04:08.040 --> 0:04:12.000
<v Speaker 3>was had as a guest, Mindy referred to her as

0:04:12.040 --> 0:04:14.080
<v Speaker 3>Meghan Markle and she was like, you know, I'm not

0:04:14.160 --> 0:04:16.719
<v Speaker 3>mark anymore. It's Meghan sussexx.

0:04:16.800 --> 0:04:19.120
<v Speaker 1>But also she's very smart. She knows that her name

0:04:19.200 --> 0:04:20.600
<v Speaker 1>recognition is Markle.

0:04:21.480 --> 0:04:22.400
<v Speaker 2>So I think.

0:04:22.240 --> 0:04:24.240
<v Speaker 1>That that Mindy Kellen's watching the show going come on

0:04:25.279 --> 0:04:27.560
<v Speaker 1>get told off when Poe gets away with it. I

0:04:27.560 --> 0:04:29.880
<v Speaker 1>think what it tells us more though, is that the

0:04:29.880 --> 0:04:32.240
<v Speaker 1>way she wanted to be introduced was as a philanthropist,

0:04:32.360 --> 0:04:36.080
<v Speaker 1>humanitarian who has the lifestyle business on the side like that.

0:04:36.480 --> 0:04:39.360
<v Speaker 1>So I think that actually that introduction is very informative

0:04:39.400 --> 0:04:41.320
<v Speaker 1>because it tells us exactly how Meg's wants to be.

0:04:41.720 --> 0:04:43.640
<v Speaker 1>I have to tell you that everything after that was

0:04:43.680 --> 0:04:44.400
<v Speaker 1>really quite dull.

0:04:44.720 --> 0:04:46.160
<v Speaker 2>So what was.

0:04:46.080 --> 0:04:48.400
<v Speaker 1>Interesting to the eagle eye amongst us is she was

0:04:48.520 --> 0:04:50.880
<v Speaker 1>dressed in black, like in a blouse and skirt. She

0:04:50.920 --> 0:04:53.080
<v Speaker 1>looked great, but she did not look like the others.

0:04:53.160 --> 0:04:56.760
<v Speaker 1>The hosts are in TV clothes like bright colors.

0:04:57.000 --> 0:04:59.040
<v Speaker 4>You're told when you go on TV not to wear black.

0:04:59.160 --> 0:05:03.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, like of posing this gorgeous, sort of strappy almost

0:05:03.720 --> 0:05:06.720
<v Speaker 1>summer dress. There's colors, there's red lipsticks, there's a lot

0:05:06.760 --> 0:05:09.279
<v Speaker 1>of color and movement. So it was a bit of

0:05:09.320 --> 0:05:13.160
<v Speaker 1>an odd wardrobe choice, right because she kind of looked

0:05:13.160 --> 0:05:14.880
<v Speaker 1>like she'd come to the office, you know.

0:05:15.040 --> 0:05:17.120
<v Speaker 2>Was she blending in with the background a little bit?

0:05:18.240 --> 0:05:18.360
<v Speaker 4>Like?

0:05:18.640 --> 0:05:22.839
<v Speaker 2>H Yes, she did. So, they were so she was

0:05:22.880 --> 0:05:23.720
<v Speaker 2>there to judge.

0:05:23.839 --> 0:05:25.719
<v Speaker 1>It was the final four. They're going down to the

0:05:25.720 --> 0:05:29.320
<v Speaker 1>final three. They're all men, they're all good cooks. Obviously

0:05:29.400 --> 0:05:32.440
<v Speaker 1>at this point I would hope so. And she said

0:05:32.480 --> 0:05:35.560
<v Speaker 1>that H as she referred to him several times, likes

0:05:35.600 --> 0:05:38.560
<v Speaker 1>meat and potatoes. She's more of a California girl. You

0:05:38.640 --> 0:05:39.320
<v Speaker 1>knew this, right.

0:05:39.440 --> 0:05:43.479
<v Speaker 2>She likes trepresses, she likes spice sprinkles.

0:05:43.800 --> 0:05:46.280
<v Speaker 1>She got to choose the hero ingredients, and she chose

0:05:46.279 --> 0:05:48.760
<v Speaker 1>all beautiful things from the garden. Of course she did,

0:05:49.279 --> 0:05:51.839
<v Speaker 1>and then she tasted like Celiria Kai, screaming this and

0:05:51.880 --> 0:05:55.599
<v Speaker 1>that it was all lovely. Then stop everything. Harry calls

0:05:55.640 --> 0:05:58.320
<v Speaker 1>on the phone again a moment of.

0:05:58.360 --> 0:06:00.880
<v Speaker 2>Complete surprise from the next door.

0:06:01.000 --> 0:06:03.680
<v Speaker 1>He's in the camera and he calls on the FaceTime

0:06:03.760 --> 0:06:06.560
<v Speaker 1>this poor man standing there getting his disjudged, and it's.

0:06:06.440 --> 0:06:07.440
<v Speaker 2>Like, everybody stop.

0:06:07.880 --> 0:06:10.120
<v Speaker 1>H's on the phone, and he calls in and him

0:06:10.120 --> 0:06:12.240
<v Speaker 1>and makes have a little chilly chat and she calls

0:06:12.279 --> 0:06:14.599
<v Speaker 1>in my love and all those things. Look, it was

0:06:14.640 --> 0:06:18.359
<v Speaker 1>pretty dull, but it was fine. But I had my

0:06:18.520 --> 0:06:21.279
<v Speaker 1>question is why did she do it? Because my prediction

0:06:21.720 --> 0:06:24.720
<v Speaker 1>when they came to Australia, because it was like this

0:06:24.839 --> 0:06:27.680
<v Speaker 1>faux royal tour and it had some business elements.

0:06:28.200 --> 0:06:30.560
<v Speaker 2>I was like, surely this is the point.

0:06:30.279 --> 0:06:32.120
<v Speaker 1>Of this is it's a promo for the fact that

0:06:32.160 --> 0:06:34.120
<v Speaker 1>as Ever is going to start shipping to Australia.

0:06:34.200 --> 0:06:35.599
<v Speaker 2>I thought that was going to be the thing.

0:06:36.040 --> 0:06:39.279
<v Speaker 1>Nope, no sign of that. Still no Australian shipping. So

0:06:39.920 --> 0:06:42.480
<v Speaker 1>the question of why is interesting.

0:06:42.800 --> 0:06:44.680
<v Speaker 4>Hear me out money, Well.

0:06:44.520 --> 0:06:48.080
<v Speaker 1>No, Amelia, oh, cynical Amelia. My friend tell me she

0:06:48.240 --> 0:06:51.680
<v Speaker 1>wasn't paid. Wow, So Channel ten have said she wasn't paid,

0:06:52.279 --> 0:06:54.960
<v Speaker 1>And so that makes it even more interesting because she

0:06:55.000 --> 0:06:58.200
<v Speaker 1>would think that that was then all about profile raising

0:06:58.200 --> 0:06:59.440
<v Speaker 1>in a certain market.

0:06:59.200 --> 0:07:00.960
<v Speaker 3>Wouldn't you the food market?

0:07:01.080 --> 0:07:03.760
<v Speaker 4>Interesting? So she was pro bono mastership.

0:07:04.760 --> 0:07:08.880
<v Speaker 1>It seems much more like something you would do to

0:07:08.880 --> 0:07:12.040
<v Speaker 1>elevate your presence and your association with food and all

0:07:12.080 --> 0:07:14.640
<v Speaker 1>those things in a particular market, which is why I

0:07:14.680 --> 0:07:16.960
<v Speaker 1>was like, oh, that's clever because and as you can

0:07:17.000 --> 0:07:20.120
<v Speaker 1>also say that there was some it was obviously very

0:07:20.120 --> 0:07:23.800
<v Speaker 1>intentional how they described as ever as well gifting, you

0:07:23.840 --> 0:07:26.200
<v Speaker 1>know what I mean, Like it was a it was

0:07:26.200 --> 0:07:27.640
<v Speaker 1>a branding exercise anyway.

0:07:27.440 --> 0:07:29.600
<v Speaker 3>Well, Australia is still part of the common world, so

0:07:29.760 --> 0:07:33.600
<v Speaker 3>is it an exercise in them broadly speaking aren't very

0:07:33.640 --> 0:07:35.880
<v Speaker 3>likable in England. So it was like more of them

0:07:35.920 --> 0:07:38.280
<v Speaker 3>just going to other countries going we want to get

0:07:38.280 --> 0:07:39.080
<v Speaker 3>there first, we want to be.

0:07:39.080 --> 0:07:39.640
<v Speaker 2>The likable one.

0:07:39.680 --> 0:07:41.880
<v Speaker 1>Well yeah, and they, I mean, that was very much

0:07:41.920 --> 0:07:44.200
<v Speaker 1>seen as the dry run for the new model that

0:07:44.200 --> 0:07:45.800
<v Speaker 1>they want to do, which is a little bit royal,

0:07:45.800 --> 0:07:48.720
<v Speaker 1>a little bit business sing and it definitely it was fine,

0:07:48.800 --> 0:07:51.120
<v Speaker 1>there was nothing. She was lovely and it was great,

0:07:51.160 --> 0:07:53.720
<v Speaker 1>but it just was a bit like interesting. I would

0:07:53.720 --> 0:07:55.800
<v Speaker 1>have if I was her marketing, I'd be like, this

0:07:55.840 --> 0:07:58.160
<v Speaker 1>would be great to launch as ever into Australia.

0:07:58.520 --> 0:08:00.960
<v Speaker 2>The other thing we have to mention for me.

0:08:00.880 --> 0:08:03.120
<v Speaker 1>Specifically because I'm sick of paying all the money for

0:08:03.160 --> 0:08:05.640
<v Speaker 1>the flower sprinkles. The other thing that happened though in

0:08:05.680 --> 0:08:08.280
<v Speaker 1>Megan world is that she posted a holiday carousel. Everybody

0:08:08.320 --> 0:08:10.080
<v Speaker 1>in the Northern Hemisphere is doing this. Of course, did

0:08:10.120 --> 0:08:12.000
<v Speaker 1>you see that? I did see the carousel?

0:08:12.200 --> 0:08:12.880
<v Speaker 2>What did you think?

0:08:13.160 --> 0:08:16.920
<v Speaker 3>I thought, very older millennial.

0:08:17.960 --> 0:08:21.640
<v Speaker 4>Out Okay, where did she go wrong? Like? What was

0:08:21.640 --> 0:08:22.320
<v Speaker 4>elder millennial?

0:08:22.440 --> 0:08:23.360
<v Speaker 2>So it was a dump?

0:08:23.400 --> 0:08:25.880
<v Speaker 4>Right, carousels are very hip.

0:08:26.360 --> 0:08:29.880
<v Speaker 1>Carousels were back she and she just posted summer holidays

0:08:30.080 --> 0:08:33.240
<v Speaker 1>and then it was like, yes they were in Portugal.

0:08:33.280 --> 0:08:35.079
<v Speaker 1>I think, yeah, no, but I want to hear what

0:08:35.120 --> 0:08:39.959
<v Speaker 1>the whole I have no problem with an elder millennial

0:08:39.960 --> 0:08:40.480
<v Speaker 1>photo dump.

0:08:40.520 --> 0:08:42.120
<v Speaker 3>In fact, I think we should bring it back. I

0:08:42.120 --> 0:08:44.800
<v Speaker 3>wrote a full piece about this. It was like it

0:08:44.840 --> 0:08:47.280
<v Speaker 3>was of the time because it's not like the blurry

0:08:47.320 --> 0:08:50.240
<v Speaker 3>picks that we usually get from gen Z people, which

0:08:50.280 --> 0:08:52.680
<v Speaker 3>is what we need from Meghan Markle, like, I want

0:08:52.960 --> 0:08:55.640
<v Speaker 3>proper pictures that I can actually dissect what is going on.

0:08:55.720 --> 0:08:57.120
<v Speaker 2>I don't want a blurry food pick.

0:08:57.320 --> 0:08:59.040
<v Speaker 3>So what I'm saying is like what she did was good,

0:08:59.160 --> 0:09:01.000
<v Speaker 3>good for us basically because.

0:09:00.920 --> 0:09:04.120
<v Speaker 4>She correctly focused the photos. It made her look old.

0:09:04.320 --> 0:09:07.199
<v Speaker 1>Yes, if it was a gen Z photo dump, it

0:09:07.200 --> 0:09:09.520
<v Speaker 1>would have been like blurry hand and we would have

0:09:09.520 --> 0:09:12.720
<v Speaker 1>been very annoyed about it, deliberately unflattering a cocktail in

0:09:12.840 --> 0:09:15.320
<v Speaker 1>half shadow like it would have just been like maybe

0:09:15.360 --> 0:09:16.160
<v Speaker 1>somebody's hand.

0:09:17.240 --> 0:09:18.079
<v Speaker 2>She was trying to.

0:09:18.040 --> 0:09:19.960
<v Speaker 4>Do the crypt she was, well, I want to know

0:09:20.040 --> 0:09:24.960
<v Speaker 4>the strategy behind Althorpe being what photo five, photo six?

0:09:25.080 --> 0:09:26.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so I think she was trying to be gen

0:09:26.960 --> 0:09:30.720
<v Speaker 1>Z because she was trying to not be too obvious, right.

0:09:31.200 --> 0:09:33.040
<v Speaker 2>And one of the things.

0:09:32.800 --> 0:09:35.040
<v Speaker 1>We talked about this on the show when Harry was

0:09:35.080 --> 0:09:39.040
<v Speaker 1>on his very controversial show visit to Britain last month

0:09:39.280 --> 0:09:42.920
<v Speaker 1>earlier this month, gosh, time is flying earlier this month,

0:09:43.240 --> 0:09:44.840
<v Speaker 1>and he went to Britain and there was will she

0:09:44.880 --> 0:09:47.680
<v Speaker 1>won't she? And the reports were that Megan and the

0:09:47.760 --> 0:09:49.679
<v Speaker 1>kids were waiting in Europe. Well, now we know where

0:09:49.720 --> 0:09:51.319
<v Speaker 1>they were waiting. They were waiting on a beach in

0:09:51.400 --> 0:09:56.080
<v Speaker 1>Portugal looks great, and they flew into England for to

0:09:56.120 --> 0:09:58.960
<v Speaker 1>go and meet the King and to go to Althorpe.

0:09:59.440 --> 0:10:03.240
<v Speaker 1>Now a lot of royal reporters are saying, so Althorpe

0:10:03.240 --> 0:10:06.360
<v Speaker 1>is Princess Diana's ancestral home. It's where she's buried on

0:10:06.360 --> 0:10:09.400
<v Speaker 1>an island in a lake, famously, and it's I guess

0:10:09.480 --> 0:10:12.600
<v Speaker 1>it's like Harry's one of Harry's birthrights. You know, he's

0:10:12.640 --> 0:10:15.240
<v Speaker 1>got the royal stuff on one side, Buckingham Palace famously

0:10:15.400 --> 0:10:18.280
<v Speaker 1>wasn't allowed to stay there, and then he's got Althorpe

0:10:18.320 --> 0:10:22.800
<v Speaker 1>on the other side. And eagle eyed royal reporters immediately

0:10:22.800 --> 0:10:24.840
<v Speaker 1>picked up that one picture where I think she was

0:10:24.880 --> 0:10:26.480
<v Speaker 1>trying to be quite gen z and it's just the

0:10:26.559 --> 0:10:29.719
<v Speaker 1>kids skipping along from the back, Harry walking from the

0:10:29.760 --> 0:10:34.520
<v Speaker 1>back in what could have been anywhere a fancy English

0:10:34.600 --> 0:10:40.320
<v Speaker 1>garden with some well trimmed bushes. They she would know that,

0:10:40.320 --> 0:10:42.439
<v Speaker 1>we would, of course, And you look very closely, you

0:10:42.480 --> 0:10:45.319
<v Speaker 1>can see that Harry is carrying flowers in his hand.

0:10:46.080 --> 0:10:48.720
<v Speaker 1>So they clearly were going to visit Diana's well.

0:10:48.800 --> 0:10:51.360
<v Speaker 4>There was no like Geo Marka on the photo.

0:10:51.559 --> 0:10:56.640
<v Speaker 1>No, just no, she did and I think there were

0:10:56.640 --> 0:11:01.640
<v Speaker 1>two pictures from Althorpe. No, yeah, no disclosure, you have

0:11:01.840 --> 0:11:04.800
<v Speaker 1>to snoop. So I first looked at this carousel, of

0:11:04.840 --> 0:11:06.960
<v Speaker 1>course I did when it first dropped, and went how nice.

0:11:07.120 --> 0:11:09.080
<v Speaker 1>And then I saw the report saying of that, south

0:11:09.120 --> 0:11:11.960
<v Speaker 1>of that, south of that health Royal reporters are saying,

0:11:12.000 --> 0:11:13.880
<v Speaker 1>And of course there's always an element of sniping this,

0:11:13.920 --> 0:11:16.000
<v Speaker 1>as there always is with anything to do with those two,

0:11:16.400 --> 0:11:17.400
<v Speaker 1>but that one.

0:11:17.240 --> 0:11:20.240
<v Speaker 2>Of the absolute conditions about going a to meet the

0:11:20.320 --> 0:11:22.679
<v Speaker 2>King and be to Althorpe was secrecy.

0:11:23.000 --> 0:11:26.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, they are apparently being trailed by film crew, but

0:11:27.280 --> 0:11:29.560
<v Speaker 1>that may be. The generous read on that is that

0:11:29.600 --> 0:11:32.920
<v Speaker 1>Harry's making a doco about Invictus, which is next year

0:11:32.920 --> 0:11:35.760
<v Speaker 1>in Birmingham in Britain. The ungenerous reader is that they're

0:11:35.800 --> 0:11:38.920
<v Speaker 1>planning a part two of their big documentary, maybe something

0:11:38.920 --> 0:11:42.559
<v Speaker 1>about Diana. But anyway, no film crew was in the picture,

0:11:42.840 --> 0:11:45.760
<v Speaker 1>but they were definitely interesting. So are you still holding

0:11:45.800 --> 0:11:46.960
<v Speaker 1>out for a family reunion?

0:11:47.440 --> 0:11:48.080
<v Speaker 2>All I want?

0:11:48.520 --> 0:11:51.880
<v Speaker 1>I've decided today, And actually after watching Meghan on the

0:11:51.960 --> 0:11:53.839
<v Speaker 1>TV last night, and I was like, this is an

0:11:53.960 --> 0:11:57.880
<v Speaker 1>entirely pointless endeavor, Like it's lovely, but what you know,

0:11:58.600 --> 0:11:59.480
<v Speaker 1>they just need to get.

0:11:59.320 --> 0:12:02.160
<v Speaker 2>Back in the Reyal Fan. I'm just absolutely cheering for them.

0:12:02.480 --> 0:12:03.680
<v Speaker 2>I just want them back there.

0:12:03.760 --> 0:12:06.480
<v Speaker 4>I just want you did this ask that question. I

0:12:06.559 --> 0:12:08.640
<v Speaker 4>need to add one other thing in here, which is

0:12:08.679 --> 0:12:12.320
<v Speaker 4>that remember how we talked about Meghan and Harry. Meghan

0:12:12.440 --> 0:12:15.319
<v Speaker 4>snuck in to visit the King at High Grove because

0:12:15.360 --> 0:12:18.240
<v Speaker 4>there was a Chanelle event happening, and so there were

0:12:18.280 --> 0:12:21.200
<v Speaker 4>people coming and going from High Grove Estate and she

0:12:21.360 --> 0:12:24.040
<v Speaker 4>was able to sort of enter under the cloak of

0:12:24.120 --> 0:12:28.640
<v Speaker 4>darkness as the Chanelle event happened. Well, one person who

0:12:28.679 --> 0:12:31.040
<v Speaker 4>was at the Chanel event was Plum Sykes. She's a

0:12:31.040 --> 0:12:34.440
<v Speaker 4>fashion writer and she wrote on her newsletter last week

0:12:34.520 --> 0:12:37.720
<v Speaker 4>this fascinating tidpit about how you get to Prince Charles

0:12:37.800 --> 0:12:40.080
<v Speaker 4>Estate and the way you get that. She was invited

0:12:40.080 --> 0:12:41.959
<v Speaker 4>to the Chanell event, but they didn't give her an address.

0:12:42.040 --> 0:12:44.200
<v Speaker 4>They just said you're going to High Grove, but here's

0:12:44.240 --> 0:12:46.280
<v Speaker 4>how you're going to get there. We drop a pin

0:12:46.480 --> 0:12:49.160
<v Speaker 4>at like a country shop in the middle of nowhere.

0:12:49.400 --> 0:12:51.800
<v Speaker 4>You drive to the country shop, you park your cart,

0:12:51.880 --> 0:12:53.880
<v Speaker 4>you walk into the shop. There is a man posing

0:12:53.880 --> 0:12:55.800
<v Speaker 4>in the store as the store manager, who was actually

0:12:55.800 --> 0:12:58.560
<v Speaker 4>an undercover police officer and you get in his cart

0:12:58.600 --> 0:12:59.880
<v Speaker 4>and he drives you to High Grove.

0:13:01.280 --> 0:13:03.800
<v Speaker 1>I want to do that so bad that Megan and

0:13:03.840 --> 0:13:06.559
<v Speaker 1>the kids had to do that. They were like walking

0:13:06.559 --> 0:13:07.559
<v Speaker 1>into the shop and they're just like.

0:13:07.600 --> 0:13:13.480
<v Speaker 4>Just hear the breast.

0:13:12.679 --> 0:13:14.160
<v Speaker 2>Like that, and he's like, you're not on the list.

0:13:14.760 --> 0:13:17.320
<v Speaker 1>You're not on the list. You're not coming in anyway.

0:13:17.360 --> 0:13:18.559
<v Speaker 1>So that's now you're up to date with all the

0:13:18.559 --> 0:13:19.080
<v Speaker 1>Megan news.

0:13:19.080 --> 0:13:19.760
<v Speaker 2>I hope you're happy.

0:13:21.000 --> 0:13:24.200
<v Speaker 3>Nicole Kidman has been holidaying in Italy and she was

0:13:24.200 --> 0:13:28.360
<v Speaker 3>spotted outside her hotel room with a mystery man.

0:13:28.720 --> 0:13:31.800
<v Speaker 2>When we say spotted, we meant.

0:13:33.160 --> 0:13:37.160
<v Speaker 1>She did not post a cryptic, but not yet anyway,

0:13:37.240 --> 0:13:40.719
<v Speaker 1>she has not posted I'm a dumb She might though.

0:13:41.240 --> 0:13:43.680
<v Speaker 2>Did any of you also think it was George Clooney?

0:13:43.960 --> 0:13:47.000
<v Speaker 4>Oh George, I don't know what.

0:13:46.920 --> 0:13:50.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking about. I didn't see them. They are paparazzi images.

0:13:50.040 --> 0:13:50.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't support it.

0:13:50.840 --> 0:13:51.160
<v Speaker 4>I don't.

0:13:51.400 --> 0:13:53.320
<v Speaker 1>I didn't even know that she was wearing a night

0:13:53.440 --> 0:13:55.840
<v Speaker 1>Oh damn, she wearing.

0:13:55.640 --> 0:13:56.839
<v Speaker 2>A beautiful silk set.

0:13:57.280 --> 0:13:59.440
<v Speaker 3>So it has now been revealed by page six that

0:13:59.480 --> 0:14:02.760
<v Speaker 3>the man in question, it's a guy named Michael Reinstein

0:14:03.120 --> 0:14:06.160
<v Speaker 3>who was a private equity investor and founder of global

0:14:06.280 --> 0:14:08.480
<v Speaker 3>private equity firm The Regent.

0:14:08.679 --> 0:14:09.360
<v Speaker 2>He sounds rich.

0:14:09.520 --> 0:14:11.640
<v Speaker 3>I think that means rich. I think anything with the

0:14:11.640 --> 0:14:13.360
<v Speaker 3>word equity means rich.

0:14:13.200 --> 0:14:17.680
<v Speaker 4>Better than public equity, is it?

0:14:17.120 --> 0:14:21.280
<v Speaker 3>So this is the first time we've seen Nicole with

0:14:21.400 --> 0:14:25.040
<v Speaker 3>someone after has split from Keith Urban and in my

0:14:25.360 --> 0:14:27.360
<v Speaker 3>head and let me know if it's the same for

0:14:27.440 --> 0:14:32.320
<v Speaker 3>you guys, private equity guy seems very abnormal for a

0:14:32.360 --> 0:14:33.480
<v Speaker 3>celebrity to date.

0:14:33.600 --> 0:14:36.320
<v Speaker 2>I always thought celebrity date celebrity, right.

0:14:36.320 --> 0:14:40.960
<v Speaker 4>Not anymore, Not anymore. Breeze Witherspoon is dating a finance man.

0:14:41.080 --> 0:14:45.120
<v Speaker 4>He's a German private equity financier. His name is Oliver Harman,

0:14:45.920 --> 0:14:47.960
<v Speaker 4>and they just went official. They've been dating since twenty

0:14:48.000 --> 0:14:52.480
<v Speaker 4>twenty four, reportedly, but they went public at the premiere

0:14:52.480 --> 0:14:56.240
<v Speaker 4>of that show l which is a Legally Blonde prequel.

0:14:56.640 --> 0:14:59.440
<v Speaker 4>They went public in June, and they were also spotted

0:14:59.480 --> 0:15:02.360
<v Speaker 4>on a lux a yacht on the French Riviera, which

0:15:02.360 --> 0:15:03.120
<v Speaker 4>sounds horrible.

0:15:03.160 --> 0:15:06.440
<v Speaker 1>Well, these women do not need the money, you know

0:15:06.480 --> 0:15:09.160
<v Speaker 1>the whole I'm looking for a man in finance situation.

0:15:09.320 --> 0:15:11.920
<v Speaker 1>They don't need the money. Why are they dating finance?

0:15:11.960 --> 0:15:14.920
<v Speaker 4>OK? I have a theory. I think that these kinds

0:15:14.920 --> 0:15:16.960
<v Speaker 4>of women there are two reasons why they're attracted to

0:15:17.040 --> 0:15:20.040
<v Speaker 4>men in finance ariesa Or and Nicole. They are in

0:15:20.080 --> 0:15:22.200
<v Speaker 4>the prime of their life. They are at the pinnacle

0:15:22.240 --> 0:15:25.280
<v Speaker 4>of their careers. They need to prove nothing to anyone.

0:15:25.680 --> 0:15:28.720
<v Speaker 4>They've also got their own routines, their own friendships. They

0:15:28.720 --> 0:15:30.720
<v Speaker 4>don't want to spend all their time with a new

0:15:30.720 --> 0:15:33.400
<v Speaker 4>love interest. They want to be doing their own thing

0:15:33.520 --> 0:15:36.160
<v Speaker 4>and then occasionally coming together with someone to go on

0:15:36.160 --> 0:15:39.120
<v Speaker 4>a yacht on the French Riviera. Yes, and so the

0:15:39.240 --> 0:15:42.600
<v Speaker 4>nice thing about private equity slash finance types is these

0:15:42.600 --> 0:15:44.960
<v Speaker 4>are guys who are still working. They're still having to

0:15:45.000 --> 0:15:48.200
<v Speaker 4>earn a living. Now it's a very fancy living, but

0:15:48.280 --> 0:15:50.400
<v Speaker 4>they're like going to work and like getting out a

0:15:50.480 --> 0:15:53.320
<v Speaker 4>laptop on the yacht and like firing up some emails.

0:15:53.640 --> 0:15:55.280
<v Speaker 4>And I think they kind of like I think in

0:15:55.360 --> 0:15:57.680
<v Speaker 4>Nicole or Reese kind of likes the idea that these

0:15:57.680 --> 0:16:01.160
<v Speaker 4>men have their own lives, that they're not revolving around them. Interesting.

0:16:01.160 --> 0:16:02.840
<v Speaker 4>And then my second theory is just because all the

0:16:02.840 --> 0:16:05.040
<v Speaker 4>men their age and Hollywood are dating much younger Wood.

0:16:04.880 --> 0:16:07.200
<v Speaker 1>Well, yes, the half life wife will get to that

0:16:07.240 --> 0:16:09.240
<v Speaker 1>another time, but they add to that theory.

0:16:09.480 --> 0:16:13.080
<v Speaker 3>There was an article in Vogue last week titled Olivia

0:16:13.160 --> 0:16:16.880
<v Speaker 3>Rodrigo and her man in Finance. No No, Olivia, No,

0:16:17.200 --> 0:16:19.360
<v Speaker 3>and it talked about how now she's been seen with

0:16:19.400 --> 0:16:23.000
<v Speaker 3>the guy who works in private equity, and the piece

0:16:23.120 --> 0:16:26.000
<v Speaker 3>was all about how even when you're a super rich,

0:16:26.160 --> 0:16:29.600
<v Speaker 3>successful woman, sometimes it is nice for someone else to

0:16:29.640 --> 0:16:30.840
<v Speaker 3>get the bill every.

0:16:30.640 --> 0:16:32.440
<v Speaker 1>Now and then. Well, I was going to say that

0:16:32.720 --> 0:16:36.280
<v Speaker 1>these guys also understand rich. So it's like we're we're

0:16:36.280 --> 0:16:38.760
<v Speaker 1>going to talk later about how there are certain rules

0:16:38.760 --> 0:16:41.400
<v Speaker 1>to rich, right in terms of hanging out on yachts

0:16:41.440 --> 0:16:42.760
<v Speaker 1>and at fancy resorts.

0:16:43.040 --> 0:16:45.480
<v Speaker 4>We know those rules, so we're going to them.

0:16:45.360 --> 0:16:46.120
<v Speaker 2>To you guys.

0:16:46.160 --> 0:16:50.000
<v Speaker 1>But it's like, these guys understand rich, but they don't

0:16:50.040 --> 0:16:52.560
<v Speaker 1>come with the famous bit, which is the stricky bit

0:16:52.600 --> 0:16:52.960
<v Speaker 1>and the.

0:16:53.280 --> 0:16:55.680
<v Speaker 4>True the Travis Kelcey of it all. I mean, look,

0:16:55.720 --> 0:16:58.520
<v Speaker 4>I'd rather Olivia date this guy who has his own

0:16:58.600 --> 0:17:01.120
<v Speaker 4>job and deal and a bit under the radar than

0:17:01.160 --> 0:17:02.000
<v Speaker 4>a Jack Antonot.

0:17:02.080 --> 0:17:05.520
<v Speaker 1>Olivia is a deeply creative soul.

0:17:05.800 --> 0:17:08.000
<v Speaker 2>She needs to be with a creative person.

0:17:08.400 --> 0:17:13.239
<v Speaker 4>No, life shouldn't be put into one person, So she

0:17:13.359 --> 0:17:15.160
<v Speaker 4>has her own creative people that she can.

0:17:15.160 --> 0:17:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Really, she has got some songs on that album. I'm

0:17:18.040 --> 0:17:20.720
<v Speaker 1>obsessed with about having dated several people who don't have

0:17:20.760 --> 0:17:24.560
<v Speaker 1>a job, So I think that maybe she's just happy

0:17:24.560 --> 0:17:25.680
<v Speaker 1>that somebody's got a job.

0:17:25.760 --> 0:17:28.480
<v Speaker 3>To your point, yes, an hooly europic fan of never

0:17:28.600 --> 0:17:30.720
<v Speaker 3>dating your type, that's true.

0:17:30.760 --> 0:17:32.520
<v Speaker 2>You've called me out on that. That's true.

0:17:32.640 --> 0:17:35.640
<v Speaker 1>I guess I said, like in my mind, I'm imagining,

0:17:35.800 --> 0:17:38.680
<v Speaker 1>and look how hilarious is it. Midlife lady has opinions

0:17:38.680 --> 0:17:41.639
<v Speaker 1>on who twenty year old pop stars should date. Like really,

0:17:41.680 --> 0:17:44.359
<v Speaker 1>not of my business, but in my and I know

0:17:44.400 --> 0:17:46.119
<v Speaker 1>they'll be out loud of shouting at the phone about this.

0:17:46.200 --> 0:17:49.560
<v Speaker 1>But my mind, like young finance bros, I imagine they're

0:17:49.600 --> 0:17:53.240
<v Speaker 1>a bit I probably have my own stereotypes about them.

0:17:53.560 --> 0:18:00.320
<v Speaker 1>Look at Anniston, she is dating woo woo. Guy says,

0:18:00.320 --> 0:18:04.760
<v Speaker 1>you've got woo woom, you've got equity, you've got fellow celebrity.

0:18:04.800 --> 0:18:06.880
<v Speaker 2>Which which door are we going to choose?

0:18:07.240 --> 0:18:09.639
<v Speaker 3>It's hard. I just feel like I've seen more and

0:18:09.680 --> 0:18:15.080
<v Speaker 3>more tiktoks of younger women like financially providing for their boyfriend.

0:18:15.200 --> 0:18:16.880
<v Speaker 2>Really, and that's true.

0:18:16.920 --> 0:18:21.560
<v Speaker 1>There's an article this week the gen zens, Yes, and

0:18:21.600 --> 0:18:23.600
<v Speaker 1>it's just getting to the point where I'm like, I

0:18:23.640 --> 0:18:26.440
<v Speaker 1>feel like we've gone the opposite a bit too far

0:18:26.880 --> 0:18:28.640
<v Speaker 1>when now it's kind of like it feels like these

0:18:28.680 --> 0:18:32.879
<v Speaker 1>younger women are being taken advantage of by their partners.

0:18:32.720 --> 0:18:36.360
<v Speaker 3>Because they're like equal rights, let me pay, let me pay,

0:18:36.359 --> 0:18:38.680
<v Speaker 3>and then it's like, wait, I'm only paying. What's going

0:18:38.720 --> 0:18:39.120
<v Speaker 3>on here?

0:18:39.160 --> 0:18:40.639
<v Speaker 4>So you're in favor of this trend?

0:18:40.880 --> 0:18:41.800
<v Speaker 3>In favor of it?

0:18:42.680 --> 0:18:46.159
<v Speaker 4>After the break, Pauline Hanson and the strategy behind not

0:18:46.320 --> 0:18:51.480
<v Speaker 4>being a woman's woman. You've probably heard what Pauline Hanson

0:18:51.600 --> 0:18:54.800
<v Speaker 4>said last week about domestic violence, but we want to

0:18:54.840 --> 0:18:58.320
<v Speaker 4>talk today about why she said it. So she did

0:18:58.320 --> 0:19:01.280
<v Speaker 4>an interview on Brisbane's four B See last Wednesday with

0:19:01.359 --> 0:19:05.360
<v Speaker 4>Gary Hardgrave, and Pauline Hanson has subsequently said that her comments,

0:19:05.359 --> 0:19:08.160
<v Speaker 4>which are been widely reported from this interview, were taken

0:19:08.160 --> 0:19:10.920
<v Speaker 4>out of context. So Holly and I had a little

0:19:10.960 --> 0:19:13.040
<v Speaker 4>chat about it, and we felt that it was important

0:19:13.119 --> 0:19:17.280
<v Speaker 4>to present the quotes in their full context so you

0:19:17.480 --> 0:19:20.639
<v Speaker 4>the listener can make up your own mind. So this

0:19:21.240 --> 0:19:23.920
<v Speaker 4>clip that we're going to hear is Pauline Hanson answering

0:19:23.920 --> 0:19:26.600
<v Speaker 4>a question from hard Grave, in which he asks her

0:19:26.640 --> 0:19:30.320
<v Speaker 4>to essentially acknowledge that domestic violence is bad. This came

0:19:30.680 --> 0:19:35.320
<v Speaker 4>up because Barnaby Joyce, Hanson's deputy, had made some somewhat

0:19:35.359 --> 0:19:38.440
<v Speaker 4>merely mouthed comments about domestic violence earlier in the week.

0:19:38.680 --> 0:19:42.480
<v Speaker 4>Let's take a listen. What's your message, Pauline Hanson to

0:19:42.600 --> 0:19:46.320
<v Speaker 4>bugs who lose their bottle, who get angry and bash

0:19:46.800 --> 0:19:49.000
<v Speaker 4>and hurt their intimate partners.

0:19:49.760 --> 0:19:52.960
<v Speaker 2>It's wrong. I want you to call it out.

0:19:53.000 --> 0:19:53.960
<v Speaker 4>Can you call it out?

0:19:54.520 --> 0:19:59.199
<v Speaker 6>Well, it is wrong, but it's also a two way street.

0:20:00.000 --> 0:20:04.359
<v Speaker 6>I'm not saying that just men and women can lose

0:20:04.400 --> 0:20:05.399
<v Speaker 6>their cruel as well.

0:20:06.320 --> 0:20:09.520
<v Speaker 4>And then, on Friday, an interview that Hansen had done

0:20:09.640 --> 0:20:13.080
<v Speaker 4>last year with The Broken Father's podcast, which is hosted

0:20:13.119 --> 0:20:17.840
<v Speaker 4>by Jared Purcell. Those interview comments resurfaced in amidst the

0:20:17.880 --> 0:20:21.000
<v Speaker 4>controversy around what she had said on Hard Grave Show.

0:20:21.280 --> 0:20:23.119
<v Speaker 4>Here's the relevant clip from that podcast.

0:20:23.600 --> 0:20:25.399
<v Speaker 7>You've got to wind back a lot of issues to

0:20:25.440 --> 0:20:27.520
<v Speaker 7>do with the family law court, and what I would

0:20:27.600 --> 0:20:33.639
<v Speaker 7>say is child support. Go after the child support. A

0:20:33.640 --> 0:20:36.040
<v Speaker 7>lot of people see it as a cash cow and

0:20:36.080 --> 0:20:38.760
<v Speaker 7>they don't want to give up custody of the children

0:20:39.000 --> 0:20:41.080
<v Speaker 7>because they're making more money out of it, especially a

0:20:41.440 --> 0:20:43.320
<v Speaker 7>lot of these guys that are on you know, good

0:20:43.400 --> 0:20:46.520
<v Speaker 7>money working in the mining sector or good jobs, construction jobs,

0:20:46.520 --> 0:20:49.040
<v Speaker 7>that type of thing. They're making good money. So the

0:20:49.119 --> 0:20:50.480
<v Speaker 7>fact is it's a cash cow.

0:20:51.160 --> 0:20:54.160
<v Speaker 4>There were other comments caught up in this controversy from

0:20:54.160 --> 0:20:57.520
<v Speaker 4>both interviews. So look, I want to talk about why

0:20:57.560 --> 0:21:00.840
<v Speaker 4>she's doing this, because it is unusual that who people

0:21:00.960 --> 0:21:05.400
<v Speaker 4>talk about as potentially down the line could potentially be

0:21:05.920 --> 0:21:10.920
<v Speaker 4>a woman Prime minister. Why she would be seemingly attacking

0:21:10.960 --> 0:21:13.200
<v Speaker 4>women in this way. I want to talk about why

0:21:13.240 --> 0:21:15.919
<v Speaker 4>that is. But I just do have to mention a

0:21:15.920 --> 0:21:18.800
<v Speaker 4>couple of quick facts about what she said on these

0:21:18.840 --> 0:21:22.159
<v Speaker 4>podcasts very quickly. Experts say that telling women to just

0:21:22.280 --> 0:21:25.879
<v Speaker 4>leave domestic violent situations is a fundamental misunderstanding of the

0:21:25.960 --> 0:21:30.640
<v Speaker 4>dynamic in those situations. According to Australian stats, about four

0:21:30.640 --> 0:21:33.399
<v Speaker 4>in five family violence offenders in the last year were men.

0:21:34.560 --> 0:21:36.800
<v Speaker 4>Thirty eight Australian women have been killed this year, according

0:21:36.840 --> 0:21:40.240
<v Speaker 4>to the Australian Femicide Watch, and the Commonwealth Government has

0:21:40.280 --> 0:21:42.440
<v Speaker 4>looked into the issue of child support and this sort

0:21:42.440 --> 0:21:45.560
<v Speaker 4>of allegation that women in particular are using it to

0:21:45.640 --> 0:21:48.800
<v Speaker 4>enrich themselves, and they have found that overwhelmingly. In fact,

0:21:48.840 --> 0:21:52.320
<v Speaker 4>the people who are done most badly by the child

0:21:52.359 --> 0:21:56.040
<v Speaker 4>support system are in fact mothers. So getting those facts

0:21:56.080 --> 0:21:58.000
<v Speaker 4>out of the way again, I want to talk about

0:21:58.000 --> 0:22:00.479
<v Speaker 4>why she's saying it, and I guess I want to

0:22:00.480 --> 0:22:02.760
<v Speaker 4>throw to you first, Holly, for your reactions.

0:22:03.720 --> 0:22:06.760
<v Speaker 1>She also said, didn't she that women shouldn't put up

0:22:06.760 --> 0:22:07.960
<v Speaker 1>with domestic violence?

0:22:08.359 --> 0:22:11.280
<v Speaker 2>That's one of the things she said, right, yep. And

0:22:11.359 --> 0:22:12.400
<v Speaker 2>she said they should leave.

0:22:12.480 --> 0:22:14.239
<v Speaker 1>She said that a couple of times, don't put up

0:22:14.280 --> 0:22:18.719
<v Speaker 1>with it, And she said I've been in that situation myself.

0:22:18.640 --> 0:22:21.240
<v Speaker 4>Yes, And she that was sort of the first time

0:22:21.280 --> 0:22:24.040
<v Speaker 4>that she's explicitly talked about being in that situation. We

0:22:24.600 --> 0:22:27.280
<v Speaker 4>obviously have known since her maiden speech in Parliament that

0:22:27.440 --> 0:22:31.280
<v Speaker 4>she identifies as a single mother who raised four children

0:22:32.280 --> 0:22:36.080
<v Speaker 4>by herself from two different marriages, but that's the first

0:22:36.119 --> 0:22:39.240
<v Speaker 4>time that she's explicitly sort of suggested that she was

0:22:39.280 --> 0:22:40.479
<v Speaker 4>a victim of domestic violence.

0:22:40.560 --> 0:22:43.199
<v Speaker 1>Because obviously those comments too about don't put up with

0:22:43.280 --> 0:22:46.680
<v Speaker 1>it were very inflammatory as well, because it very squarely

0:22:46.720 --> 0:22:50.080
<v Speaker 1>puts the responsibility onto the woman for you should leave.

0:22:50.119 --> 0:22:51.000
<v Speaker 2>Why don't you just leave?

0:22:51.080 --> 0:22:54.600
<v Speaker 1>And you know, we've had decades of education about that

0:22:54.720 --> 0:22:57.600
<v Speaker 1>now about why that is a really dangerous message. So

0:22:57.640 --> 0:23:00.480
<v Speaker 1>as you've already said most of what she said actually

0:23:00.520 --> 0:23:04.600
<v Speaker 1>incorrect and inflammatory, I think that's part of the point

0:23:04.840 --> 0:23:09.600
<v Speaker 1>that it's inflammatory. She for a start, Pauline Hanson, since

0:23:09.600 --> 0:23:13.159
<v Speaker 1>her very maiden speech is all about saying the inflammatory

0:23:13.200 --> 0:23:14.080
<v Speaker 1>thing and getting attention.

0:23:14.280 --> 0:23:14.879
<v Speaker 2>She still is.

0:23:15.000 --> 0:23:19.399
<v Speaker 1>She isn't changing course on that, and her targets on

0:23:19.520 --> 0:23:23.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot of her anti immigration rhetoric over the decades

0:23:23.040 --> 0:23:28.359
<v Speaker 1>have shifted from Asian Australians to African Australians, to Indigenous

0:23:28.359 --> 0:23:32.720
<v Speaker 1>Australians to now Islamic Australians. She's shifted that, but this

0:23:32.840 --> 0:23:37.399
<v Speaker 1>conversation about women and men and men being hard done

0:23:37.440 --> 0:23:41.959
<v Speaker 1>by in kind of what a certain section of the

0:23:42.000 --> 0:23:47.920
<v Speaker 1>political scene I guess would call gender issues has never shifted.

0:23:47.960 --> 0:23:51.200
<v Speaker 1>She's always been on that and I always been quite

0:23:51.240 --> 0:23:54.520
<v Speaker 1>consistent on that, And I think that part of that

0:23:54.920 --> 0:23:59.880
<v Speaker 1>is it's very deeply ingrained in Hanson and one nation

0:24:00.080 --> 0:24:03.199
<v Speaker 1>world view to not be a victim, and even if

0:24:03.240 --> 0:24:06.800
<v Speaker 1>you literally are a victim, as Hansen appears to have

0:24:06.840 --> 0:24:09.960
<v Speaker 1>been by her comments, to pull yourself up by your bootstraps,

0:24:10.000 --> 0:24:12.560
<v Speaker 1>get yourself out of there, move it on. All those

0:24:12.560 --> 0:24:17.000
<v Speaker 1>things are very deep in that philosophy. And the other

0:24:17.080 --> 0:24:22.080
<v Speaker 1>thing is that, interestingly, One Nation used to be the

0:24:22.119 --> 0:24:25.719
<v Speaker 1>bread and body, used to be men overwhelmingly. Only a

0:24:25.840 --> 0:24:29.840
<v Speaker 1>year ago only five percent of One Nation supporters were women.

0:24:30.160 --> 0:24:33.399
<v Speaker 1>So she has spent a long time building that base

0:24:33.560 --> 0:24:36.679
<v Speaker 1>of men of a certain age and stage and life.

0:24:37.040 --> 0:24:41.160
<v Speaker 1>And that area of right wing politics is much more

0:24:41.200 --> 0:24:44.439
<v Speaker 1>male dominated and heavy, both internally and externally. So I mean,

0:24:44.520 --> 0:24:47.359
<v Speaker 1>it's got more male politicians, more male power brokers, and

0:24:47.400 --> 0:24:49.880
<v Speaker 1>more men voting for them. So she's spent a long

0:24:49.880 --> 0:24:53.879
<v Speaker 1>time building that base and she's not about to abandon it. Interestingly,

0:24:54.240 --> 0:24:58.040
<v Speaker 1>in the last year, that gap has changed, those stats

0:24:58.080 --> 0:25:01.560
<v Speaker 1>have changed a lot, and now for One Nation among

0:25:01.560 --> 0:25:04.520
<v Speaker 1>women is around twenty five percent, So in one year

0:25:04.560 --> 0:25:07.439
<v Speaker 1>it's gone from five to twenty five percent. So I

0:25:07.480 --> 0:25:09.960
<v Speaker 1>think she has a certain level of confidence that now

0:25:10.000 --> 0:25:13.840
<v Speaker 1>she's speaking for a whole lot of people. Gender is

0:25:13.920 --> 0:25:17.480
<v Speaker 1>less the defining characteristic of whether or not you'd vote

0:25:17.480 --> 0:25:19.840
<v Speaker 1>One Nation than where you live, how old you are,

0:25:19.920 --> 0:25:21.400
<v Speaker 1>and what you do for a living. Those are more

0:25:21.400 --> 0:25:26.360
<v Speaker 1>defining characteristics. It's interesting because she's not alone in this

0:25:27.040 --> 0:25:30.960
<v Speaker 1>when other female leaders on the right side of When

0:25:31.000 --> 0:25:32.520
<v Speaker 1>I say the right side of politics, I mean the

0:25:32.520 --> 0:25:35.520
<v Speaker 1>political right have come up through the ranks as way

0:25:35.560 --> 0:25:37.680
<v Speaker 1>back as the late seventies with Margaret Thatcher, who is

0:25:37.720 --> 0:25:41.800
<v Speaker 1>an iconic right wing female leader. Being a woman is

0:25:41.840 --> 0:25:43.960
<v Speaker 1>not a factor that they want to talk about very much.

0:25:44.040 --> 0:25:47.560
<v Speaker 1>There's no as they always will say, we're very you know,

0:25:48.720 --> 0:25:52.280
<v Speaker 1>they hate identity politics and that includes gender politics. Thatcher,

0:25:52.359 --> 0:25:55.360
<v Speaker 1>for example, she came up through the ranks of politics

0:25:55.400 --> 0:25:58.199
<v Speaker 1>at a time when it was very male dominated on

0:25:58.320 --> 0:26:01.120
<v Speaker 1>the left, you could argue by unions, on the right,

0:26:01.200 --> 0:26:04.320
<v Speaker 1>by the sort of eternites the public school brigade, and

0:26:04.400 --> 0:26:07.440
<v Speaker 1>she had to deal with that world. So the last

0:26:07.440 --> 0:26:09.840
<v Speaker 1>thing you do is bang on about being a woman.

0:26:09.960 --> 0:26:12.280
<v Speaker 1>You're like, I'm as tough as all you guys. There's

0:26:12.320 --> 0:26:15.400
<v Speaker 1>nothing different about me. She would not identify as a feminist,

0:26:15.440 --> 0:26:18.840
<v Speaker 1>she would not deal with any women's issues in inverted commas.

0:26:19.400 --> 0:26:21.320
<v Speaker 1>And I guess that lots of us think that that

0:26:21.440 --> 0:26:24.720
<v Speaker 1>has changed. But even in Britain right now, the leader

0:26:24.760 --> 0:26:28.240
<v Speaker 1>of the Conservative Party is a woman called Kemmy Baidenock,

0:26:28.960 --> 0:26:30.000
<v Speaker 1>a black British woman.

0:26:30.600 --> 0:26:33.000
<v Speaker 2>She is very similarly.

0:26:33.240 --> 0:26:36.960
<v Speaker 1>Hates feminist rhetoric, hates what she would call identity politics,

0:26:37.240 --> 0:26:39.320
<v Speaker 1>won't play anything about being a woman. So I think

0:26:39.359 --> 0:26:44.159
<v Speaker 1>that even something as devastating as family violence and Australia's

0:26:44.200 --> 0:26:46.879
<v Speaker 1>family violence statistics, as we've talked about recently on the

0:26:46.880 --> 0:26:50.400
<v Speaker 1>show Stubbornly Not Moving a week when we lost four

0:26:50.480 --> 0:26:53.760
<v Speaker 1>women two weeks ago, these things are not going anywhere.

0:26:53.800 --> 0:26:57.240
<v Speaker 1>It's like to talk about them overtly as something that

0:26:57.320 --> 0:27:00.399
<v Speaker 1>Australian women are concerned about is off brand for a

0:27:00.440 --> 0:27:02.200
<v Speaker 1>Hanson one hundred percent.

0:27:02.359 --> 0:27:06.480
<v Speaker 3>It's interesting that you say that, like her likability amongst

0:27:06.520 --> 0:27:11.479
<v Speaker 3>women has grown, because Pauline Hanson has never been in

0:27:11.560 --> 0:27:14.320
<v Speaker 3>my world. Like I know that from the get go

0:27:14.440 --> 0:27:17.359
<v Speaker 3>of hearing about her, she would never like rely on

0:27:17.400 --> 0:27:20.280
<v Speaker 3>someone like me for a vote because I'm Brown, my

0:27:20.480 --> 0:27:25.120
<v Speaker 3>parents are Indians who migrated to Australia, and she's never

0:27:25.240 --> 0:27:27.360
<v Speaker 3>just been in my bubble. But the more I hear

0:27:27.440 --> 0:27:30.359
<v Speaker 3>about her, it is scary that she's getting more and

0:27:30.400 --> 0:27:33.000
<v Speaker 3>more popular, especially for someone like me with my parents

0:27:33.040 --> 0:27:35.720
<v Speaker 3>and my family. But at the same time, when I

0:27:35.760 --> 0:27:38.440
<v Speaker 3>look at all these interviews, like listening to those clips,

0:27:38.800 --> 0:27:41.760
<v Speaker 3>I don't actually think the context helps her at all

0:27:42.280 --> 0:27:44.520
<v Speaker 3>because I always sort of had the picture of the

0:27:44.520 --> 0:27:47.360
<v Speaker 3>person I would think of who would vote for Pauline Hanson,

0:27:47.840 --> 0:27:50.399
<v Speaker 3>and then she does something and says something that completely

0:27:50.600 --> 0:27:54.239
<v Speaker 3>contradicts that image I had in my head. So it

0:27:54.320 --> 0:27:57.560
<v Speaker 3>is interesting that she is, I guess, doesn't want to

0:27:57.600 --> 0:28:01.440
<v Speaker 3>label herself as someone who's looking out for women's issues,

0:28:01.880 --> 0:28:04.280
<v Speaker 3>but it also feels like she's going in the direct

0:28:04.320 --> 0:28:05.160
<v Speaker 3>opposite of that.

0:28:06.160 --> 0:28:09.119
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it's like you mentioned identity politics before, Holly, and

0:28:09.160 --> 0:28:12.640
<v Speaker 4>how a lot of fire right politicians say they hate

0:28:12.680 --> 0:28:16.160
<v Speaker 4>identity politics, Well, they hate a particular kind of identity politics.

0:28:16.200 --> 0:28:19.760
<v Speaker 4>Because Pauline Hanson is all about how dads have been

0:28:19.800 --> 0:28:22.199
<v Speaker 4>hard done by. One could argue that dad is a

0:28:22.200 --> 0:28:25.440
<v Speaker 4>form of identity just as potent as mum. But anyways, setting.

0:28:25.280 --> 0:28:29.160
<v Speaker 1>Up so also is the brand of Australianism that one

0:28:29.280 --> 0:28:31.720
<v Speaker 1>nation is pushing hard. That's an identity. It's a very

0:28:31.720 --> 0:28:32.720
<v Speaker 1>powerful identity.

0:28:32.920 --> 0:28:36.359
<v Speaker 4>And I think that was a great point about how

0:28:36.760 --> 0:28:41.040
<v Speaker 4>it's not just that she's anti feminist. Now there has

0:28:41.160 --> 0:28:46.400
<v Speaker 4>been a shift where she has become almost pro pro

0:28:46.560 --> 0:28:48.760
<v Speaker 4>men's rights, is how I would put it.

0:28:48.960 --> 0:28:50.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's a shift though, I think that

0:28:50.640 --> 0:28:52.120
<v Speaker 1>that used to be her bread and buttery.

0:28:52.240 --> 0:28:54.760
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, well, I think she's just more avert about it.

0:28:54.880 --> 0:28:58.040
<v Speaker 4>Maybe it's just that the global mood is now matching

0:28:58.640 --> 0:29:01.680
<v Speaker 4>what she's been saying since her maiden speaks to Parliament

0:29:01.680 --> 0:29:04.320
<v Speaker 4>back in nineteen ninety seven. Because you mentioned, like some

0:29:04.440 --> 0:29:09.040
<v Speaker 4>other global leaders, Georgia Maloney, who is the first female

0:29:09.080 --> 0:29:12.040
<v Speaker 4>Prime Minister of Italy. She is the head of a

0:29:12.080 --> 0:29:14.400
<v Speaker 4>party called Brothers of Italy. Now I don't think, I

0:29:14.400 --> 0:29:17.280
<v Speaker 4>don't speak Italian, but that doesn't sound like a super

0:29:17.320 --> 0:29:20.520
<v Speaker 4>welcoming party to women. And she is far right. She's

0:29:20.560 --> 0:29:24.680
<v Speaker 4>anti immigration, she's anti LGBT rights, she is of course

0:29:24.760 --> 0:29:28.040
<v Speaker 4>avowedly anti feminist. And then you've got Marie La Penn

0:29:28.160 --> 0:29:31.960
<v Speaker 4>in France, another far right politician who distances herself from

0:29:31.960 --> 0:29:35.000
<v Speaker 4>the idea of feminism. She is a twice divorced single mother,

0:29:35.200 --> 0:29:39.640
<v Speaker 4>just like Pauline Hanson, and just like Pauline Hanson. Analyst

0:29:39.760 --> 0:29:42.520
<v Speaker 4>is saying that the reason why she has become such

0:29:42.560 --> 0:29:46.680
<v Speaker 4>a powerful political figure is because she softens that far

0:29:46.840 --> 0:29:50.000
<v Speaker 4>right rhetoric and policy. People think, how bad can it

0:29:50.040 --> 0:29:51.760
<v Speaker 4>be if a woman's in charge?

0:29:52.560 --> 0:29:56.200
<v Speaker 1>That's really interesting because when I was reading about the

0:29:56.720 --> 0:29:59.760
<v Speaker 1>sort of satcher appeal and the sort of hard woman appeal,

0:29:59.760 --> 0:30:03.520
<v Speaker 1>which very much what Hanson is. Being a mother is

0:30:03.600 --> 0:30:06.920
<v Speaker 1>part of that identity, right, but it's a very specific

0:30:07.040 --> 0:30:09.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of like you know, as you said that Hanson

0:30:09.360 --> 0:30:10.880
<v Speaker 1>from her get go has always been I'm a mother

0:30:10.920 --> 0:30:12.880
<v Speaker 1>of four, I'm a hard battler, I've done it tough,

0:30:13.840 --> 0:30:16.960
<v Speaker 1>I pulled myself through it. But it's a version of

0:30:17.080 --> 0:30:21.360
<v Speaker 1>mother that is kind of like defender of the family,

0:30:23.760 --> 0:30:28.200
<v Speaker 1>mama bear, almost like a very almost aggressive kind of role.

0:30:28.640 --> 0:30:31.720
<v Speaker 1>And that one reason why Hanson seems to be scapegoating women,

0:30:32.040 --> 0:30:34.480
<v Speaker 1>or that's certainly the way that you could read those

0:30:34.600 --> 0:30:38.240
<v Speaker 1>domestic violence comments by suggesting that single mothers are all

0:30:38.240 --> 0:30:40.320
<v Speaker 1>on the make, you know, or trying to get rich

0:30:40.560 --> 0:30:45.600
<v Speaker 1>and you know, commit welfare fraud, or that they should

0:30:45.640 --> 0:30:47.920
<v Speaker 1>just get out of those bad relationships. It's kind of

0:30:47.920 --> 0:30:50.560
<v Speaker 1>something for many people feels like a betrayal of women.

0:30:51.080 --> 0:30:53.760
<v Speaker 1>It can be seen that these female politicians are making

0:30:53.800 --> 0:30:57.240
<v Speaker 1>something of what we call a patriarchal bargain, which is

0:30:57.320 --> 0:31:00.480
<v Speaker 1>where in order to get individual power, and we often

0:31:00.480 --> 0:31:02.960
<v Speaker 1>talk about this in terms of beauty standards, for example,

0:31:03.480 --> 0:31:06.840
<v Speaker 1>in order to get individual power women will buy into

0:31:06.880 --> 0:31:10.080
<v Speaker 1>a structure or a belief system that is fundamentally patriarchal

0:31:10.120 --> 0:31:11.800
<v Speaker 1>and not great for women. And I know that's lots

0:31:11.800 --> 0:31:15.240
<v Speaker 1>of like gender studies, what are wan kind of language,

0:31:15.240 --> 0:31:18.080
<v Speaker 1>But the bottom line is you suck up to the dudes.

0:31:18.200 --> 0:31:19.840
<v Speaker 2>That's basically the way to do it.

0:31:19.880 --> 0:31:21.640
<v Speaker 1>Is you suck up to the dudes to get in

0:31:21.720 --> 0:31:24.000
<v Speaker 1>and to get into a position of power. And maybe

0:31:24.000 --> 0:31:26.880
<v Speaker 1>those are your true beliefs, absolutely, but also maybe there's

0:31:26.920 --> 0:31:30.120
<v Speaker 1>some strategy in there in terms of, like to get

0:31:30.120 --> 0:31:32.240
<v Speaker 1>in with the big boys, you have to play with

0:31:32.280 --> 0:31:35.600
<v Speaker 1>the big boys almost. I want to come through the

0:31:35.680 --> 0:31:38.520
<v Speaker 1>ranks of this very male dominated side of politics.

0:31:39.240 --> 0:31:39.880
<v Speaker 2>There are a lot of.

0:31:39.800 --> 0:31:43.000
<v Speaker 1>Women winging out there feminism has gone too far. I

0:31:43.040 --> 0:31:45.120
<v Speaker 1>know a lot of you guys think that, and I

0:31:45.160 --> 0:31:49.880
<v Speaker 1>know that the Mega movement feels that too. Is that

0:31:49.960 --> 0:31:53.360
<v Speaker 1>maybe their targets for derision in other ways are quite divided,

0:31:53.400 --> 0:31:57.040
<v Speaker 1>whether they think it's some you know, different races or

0:31:57.040 --> 0:31:59.240
<v Speaker 1>ethnicities or whatever, but they can all seem to agree

0:31:59.240 --> 0:32:01.760
<v Speaker 1>that women base have all got a bit too big

0:32:01.800 --> 0:32:06.160
<v Speaker 1>for their boots at the expense of men. And it's

0:32:06.200 --> 0:32:08.520
<v Speaker 1>all something a bit depressing in the fact that like

0:32:08.760 --> 0:32:12.880
<v Speaker 1>dismissing traditionally female concerns is a unifying factor.

0:32:13.200 --> 0:32:15.920
<v Speaker 4>I think that's the answer to your question of why

0:32:16.680 --> 0:32:20.000
<v Speaker 4>it's such an interesting observation that you made that one

0:32:20.120 --> 0:32:23.880
<v Speaker 4>nation support amongst women has ramped up at the very

0:32:24.000 --> 0:32:28.560
<v Speaker 4>time that we are hearing more from one nation about

0:32:28.600 --> 0:32:33.520
<v Speaker 4>these kinds of anti women, or at least anti feminist

0:32:33.640 --> 0:32:36.840
<v Speaker 4>policies and positions. And one answer as to why that

0:32:37.040 --> 0:32:40.240
<v Speaker 4>is because it seems confusing. Why would women be supporting

0:32:41.120 --> 0:32:44.840
<v Speaker 4>a party that is explicitly not fighting for them? And

0:32:44.920 --> 0:32:48.160
<v Speaker 4>I guess the answer could be that the far right

0:32:48.360 --> 0:32:51.000
<v Speaker 4>is just as divided as the far left. They've got

0:32:51.040 --> 0:32:54.880
<v Speaker 4>lots of different concerns, whether it be they don't want

0:32:54.920 --> 0:32:59.360
<v Speaker 4>AI regulated, they're very anti abortion, they don't like immigration.

0:33:00.120 --> 0:33:03.520
<v Speaker 4>One way to unite them all, including the women by

0:33:03.560 --> 0:33:06.880
<v Speaker 4>the way, in that in that movement, is by saying,

0:33:06.880 --> 0:33:09.800
<v Speaker 4>but we can all agree that feminism it all went

0:33:09.840 --> 0:33:10.840
<v Speaker 4>downhill with me too.

0:33:11.560 --> 0:33:12.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's true.

0:33:13.320 --> 0:33:17.360
<v Speaker 1>After the break, the comedian with some very blunt advice

0:33:17.560 --> 0:33:22.000
<v Speaker 1>about how to be a decent guest, Chelsea Handler. She

0:33:22.400 --> 0:33:26.320
<v Speaker 1>is a comedian, a show host, a mogul. Do you

0:33:26.400 --> 0:33:28.680
<v Speaker 1>know I was trying to remember where I first came

0:33:28.720 --> 0:33:31.920
<v Speaker 1>across Chelsea Handler. She's very funny, very biding.

0:33:32.160 --> 0:33:34.440
<v Speaker 3>For me, it was literally just like her stand up,

0:33:34.640 --> 0:33:36.040
<v Speaker 3>like she is so big in stand up.

0:33:36.040 --> 0:33:37.680
<v Speaker 1>And then she had a talk show for a while.

0:33:38.120 --> 0:33:40.520
<v Speaker 1>She now has a finger and a lot of different pies.

0:33:40.600 --> 0:33:43.400
<v Speaker 1>He of course has a podcast. She is also a

0:33:43.600 --> 0:33:48.200
<v Speaker 1>very pissed off auntie. It's a northern summer. As discussed,

0:33:48.240 --> 0:33:52.640
<v Speaker 1>everybody's on holiday with their financier boyfriends, their fancy places.

0:33:53.040 --> 0:33:55.600
<v Speaker 1>And Chelsea's been on holiday. But she's been well. Actually

0:33:55.640 --> 0:33:57.400
<v Speaker 1>she's been on a few holidays because I follow her

0:33:57.400 --> 0:33:59.800
<v Speaker 1>on social and she knows how to holiday, this woman.

0:34:00.320 --> 0:34:01.000
<v Speaker 2>But one of the.

0:34:00.960 --> 0:34:04.280
<v Speaker 1>Holidays she's been on was with her family. She took

0:34:04.640 --> 0:34:08.080
<v Speaker 1>an unspecified number of her five siblings and her many

0:34:08.200 --> 0:34:11.960
<v Speaker 1>now adultish nieces and nephews to a house on Martha's

0:34:12.000 --> 0:34:18.120
<v Speaker 1>Vineyard for a lovely all all included, glorious holiday.

0:34:18.360 --> 0:34:19.560
<v Speaker 2>Martha's Vineyard's like.

0:34:19.880 --> 0:34:22.880
<v Speaker 4>It's where the Obamas have a house, all the famous people.

0:34:22.920 --> 0:34:26.320
<v Speaker 1>It's beautiful, fancy people. I'm sure many financiers have a

0:34:26.400 --> 0:34:30.320
<v Speaker 1>house there. Bell Burdon's book is about Martha's Vineyard. Anyway,

0:34:30.400 --> 0:34:32.799
<v Speaker 1>So Chelsea got a house from a friend and she

0:34:32.880 --> 0:34:37.280
<v Speaker 1>took her family there. They did not behave well, specifically

0:34:37.800 --> 0:34:40.480
<v Speaker 1>the nieces and nephews. She posted, I'm not going to

0:34:40.560 --> 0:34:43.120
<v Speaker 1>read the whole thing because no shit. She talking about

0:34:43.640 --> 0:34:49.000
<v Speaker 1>millennial carousel dumps on Instagram. She's definitely gen x and

0:34:49.040 --> 0:34:52.280
<v Speaker 1>she went about eight slides deep very it was Brooklyn Beckham.

0:34:52.360 --> 0:34:56.040
<v Speaker 1>It was a Brooklyn and it was addressed to all

0:34:56.120 --> 0:34:58.800
<v Speaker 1>my nuggets, who I assume are her nieces and nephews.

0:34:59.200 --> 0:35:01.880
<v Speaker 1>And she's said it's always a sign you are about

0:35:01.920 --> 0:35:04.760
<v Speaker 1>to get in big trouble. She started it by saying,

0:35:04.840 --> 0:35:07.279
<v Speaker 1>I want to start this email because she reposted an

0:35:07.320 --> 0:35:10.680
<v Speaker 1>email she'd send to the family by telling each of

0:35:10.719 --> 0:35:13.359
<v Speaker 1>you that I love you and that I could never

0:35:13.520 --> 0:35:14.200
<v Speaker 1>unlove you.

0:35:13.960 --> 0:35:16.440
<v Speaker 2>You're like, oh, what's coming next?

0:35:17.320 --> 0:35:19.960
<v Speaker 1>And then she got into it. So it's with great

0:35:20.000 --> 0:35:21.920
<v Speaker 1>love and hope that we can use this as an

0:35:21.920 --> 0:35:25.160
<v Speaker 1>opportunity to get better. Our family is dysfunctional and that's

0:35:25.200 --> 0:35:26.080
<v Speaker 1>what families are.

0:35:26.239 --> 0:35:27.480
<v Speaker 2>What we need to work on.

0:35:27.520 --> 0:35:32.759
<v Speaker 1>However, are manners. So specifically, then Chelsea goes into a

0:35:32.800 --> 0:35:34.719
<v Speaker 1>list of things that she thinks everybody should do.

0:35:34.760 --> 0:35:37.160
<v Speaker 4>But think if I was sending this as an email, I.

0:35:37.120 --> 0:35:39.319
<v Speaker 2>Think she did send it as an email and went

0:35:39.360 --> 0:35:40.040
<v Speaker 2>public with it.

0:35:40.080 --> 0:35:42.319
<v Speaker 3>I wonder if she got some like snargy replies to

0:35:42.360 --> 0:35:42.720
<v Speaker 3>the email.

0:35:43.360 --> 0:35:44.040
<v Speaker 2>Imagine it.

0:35:44.120 --> 0:35:45.440
<v Speaker 4>She probably didn't get any replies.

0:35:45.680 --> 0:35:48.279
<v Speaker 1>She starts here, and I just want to say, like,

0:35:48.400 --> 0:35:51.160
<v Speaker 1>as this has got big auntie energy, because it's like

0:35:51.440 --> 0:35:55.160
<v Speaker 1>your kids are disgusting to assist us. Say hello to

0:35:55.239 --> 0:35:57.000
<v Speaker 1>the people who are working in the house. This is

0:35:57.000 --> 0:35:59.680
<v Speaker 1>posh person stuff. This is you need to acknowledge their

0:35:59.680 --> 0:36:03.640
<v Speaker 1>exist stance out of decency and respect. This goes for

0:36:03.719 --> 0:36:05.520
<v Speaker 1>my house in La or Ma, Lorca, or on the

0:36:05.600 --> 0:36:09.520
<v Speaker 1>vinyard or wherever we are. Say hello, right. I treat

0:36:09.520 --> 0:36:11.360
<v Speaker 1>my employees like family, and I expect you to do

0:36:11.400 --> 0:36:13.520
<v Speaker 1>the same. It is the nice and decent thing to

0:36:13.640 --> 0:36:16.680
<v Speaker 1>do to consider the other people who are on holiday

0:36:16.680 --> 0:36:19.880
<v Speaker 1>with you. That means not having second helpings before everybody

0:36:19.880 --> 0:36:23.600
<v Speaker 1>else does, not finishing the bottles of Belvidere that I purchased,

0:36:23.800 --> 0:36:27.000
<v Speaker 1>that's fancy vodka, or ginger ale that I flew with

0:36:27.080 --> 0:36:30.839
<v Speaker 1>across the country that they don't sell on the vineyard.

0:36:30.040 --> 0:36:32.359
<v Speaker 3>In this whole post is just a big humble brain,

0:36:32.360 --> 0:36:34.279
<v Speaker 3>and it really is. But I love this bit.

0:36:34.360 --> 0:36:37.319
<v Speaker 1>She says a good rule of thumb for guests is

0:36:37.400 --> 0:36:41.280
<v Speaker 1>never finish anything. Don't finish the picture of Margarita's, don't

0:36:41.280 --> 0:36:43.879
<v Speaker 1>take the last thing off the plate. Do not roll

0:36:43.920 --> 0:36:45.839
<v Speaker 1>your eyes repeatedly at my friends.

0:36:46.400 --> 0:36:47.160
<v Speaker 2>I imagine.

0:36:47.239 --> 0:36:51.840
<v Speaker 3>Okay, when I was reading this, I was like, oh, yeah,

0:36:51.840 --> 0:36:53.600
<v Speaker 3>this is good. This is good to teach your kids.

0:36:53.600 --> 0:36:55.000
<v Speaker 3>This is really nice. And then I get to the

0:36:55.040 --> 0:36:58.400
<v Speaker 3>part where she says, don't drink copious amounts of alcohol,

0:36:59.160 --> 0:37:03.040
<v Speaker 3>and she's like, she's like, you can have drinking within

0:37:03.080 --> 0:37:04.080
<v Speaker 3>a reasonable amount.

0:37:04.360 --> 0:37:06.360
<v Speaker 1>And then I was like, wait a minute, is she

0:37:06.400 --> 0:37:08.880
<v Speaker 1>talking about adults. Are these kids adult?

0:37:09.000 --> 0:37:09.200
<v Speaker 4>Yeah?

0:37:09.200 --> 0:37:09.520
<v Speaker 2>They are.

0:37:09.520 --> 0:37:13.120
<v Speaker 3>They're like rolling their eyes at people, and they're not

0:37:13.280 --> 0:37:14.120
<v Speaker 3>washing their dishes.

0:37:14.160 --> 0:37:16.320
<v Speaker 4>To be fair, her friends are probably really annoying.

0:37:17.120 --> 0:37:19.080
<v Speaker 2>You are not at home. You are a guest.

0:37:19.239 --> 0:37:21.759
<v Speaker 1>She says, do not litter on the grounds of someone

0:37:21.760 --> 0:37:23.719
<v Speaker 1>else's house. So I think what she's talking about is

0:37:23.760 --> 0:37:26.040
<v Speaker 1>like entitled young adults.

0:37:26.320 --> 0:37:26.400
<v Speaker 4>Ye.

0:37:26.480 --> 0:37:29.520
<v Speaker 2>Right, So she's upset about the way they've treated the house.

0:37:29.560 --> 0:37:31.880
<v Speaker 1>Then she also says, I understand not everyone wants to

0:37:31.880 --> 0:37:34.000
<v Speaker 1>hang out with the family twenty four to seven, but

0:37:34.080 --> 0:37:36.360
<v Speaker 1>I am going to require that when you are with

0:37:36.480 --> 0:37:38.440
<v Speaker 1>the family, like during a game, or a movie. You

0:37:38.480 --> 0:37:41.640
<v Speaker 1>are not on your phone, you are not playing video games.

0:37:42.000 --> 0:37:43.919
<v Speaker 1>You have the entire day to do whatever you want.

0:37:43.960 --> 0:37:45.480
<v Speaker 1>You can make the time to be present with the

0:37:45.520 --> 0:37:47.439
<v Speaker 1>family for an hour or two at night, said every

0:37:47.520 --> 0:37:51.160
<v Speaker 1>parent always, And then she says, I know you're probably

0:37:51.239 --> 0:37:53.399
<v Speaker 1>rolling your eyes, but I promise you everything I'm saying

0:37:53.400 --> 0:37:56.239
<v Speaker 1>will help you in life. She also tells them off

0:37:56.239 --> 0:37:58.919
<v Speaker 1>for not treating their mothers with enough respect. Ah, good,

0:37:59.040 --> 0:38:01.520
<v Speaker 1>big auntie energy. I know your moms can drive you

0:38:01.560 --> 0:38:04.720
<v Speaker 1>crazy moms obviously, but you cannot speak to your mother's

0:38:04.719 --> 0:38:07.120
<v Speaker 1>the way you do sometimes, especially not in front of

0:38:07.160 --> 0:38:09.840
<v Speaker 1>other people. You who are only going to regret treating

0:38:09.880 --> 0:38:12.080
<v Speaker 1>your moms like that, also help them. I do not

0:38:12.120 --> 0:38:13.720
<v Speaker 1>bring my sisters on holiday.

0:38:13.360 --> 0:38:14.120
<v Speaker 2>To do the dishes.

0:38:14.400 --> 0:38:19.600
<v Speaker 1>WHOA, you are old enough to understand how to reassess

0:38:19.640 --> 0:38:21.400
<v Speaker 1>how you want to be in the world. So basically,

0:38:21.760 --> 0:38:24.120
<v Speaker 1>she is giving them a massive serve. Please say please

0:38:24.120 --> 0:38:27.080
<v Speaker 1>and thank you every opportunity. Clean up after yourself.

0:38:27.280 --> 0:38:28.000
<v Speaker 4>Da da da da da.

0:38:28.080 --> 0:38:29.680
<v Speaker 1>It's a decent and polite thing to do, and it

0:38:29.719 --> 0:38:31.760
<v Speaker 1>will help you in life, and so on and so forth.

0:38:32.800 --> 0:38:35.920
<v Speaker 1>What do we think about such a public family dressing

0:38:35.960 --> 0:38:39.600
<v Speaker 1>down and does Chelsea Handler have a point about annoying

0:38:39.800 --> 0:38:40.880
<v Speaker 1>entitled guests?

0:38:41.360 --> 0:38:44.000
<v Speaker 3>I say one hundred percent, because she talks about these

0:38:44.000 --> 0:38:47.000
<v Speaker 3>family holidays as if it's something that they've always gone on,

0:38:47.560 --> 0:38:49.839
<v Speaker 3>and she makes it very clear in the post where

0:38:49.840 --> 0:38:52.799
<v Speaker 3>she says, I'm the one with the money, yes, like

0:38:52.840 --> 0:38:55.760
<v Speaker 3>it's my Like, it's very expensive to do this for you, guys,

0:38:55.920 --> 0:39:01.239
<v Speaker 3>be more appreciative. She also ended in like a seemingly threat.

0:39:01.440 --> 0:39:03.239
<v Speaker 1>I don't care how much her family annoys you. It's

0:39:03.239 --> 0:39:04.759
<v Speaker 1>the only one we've got blah blah blah. But she

0:39:04.840 --> 0:39:07.279
<v Speaker 1>basically says, I won't bring you again. Yeah, if you

0:39:07.360 --> 0:39:09.280
<v Speaker 1>don't do better, I'm not going to bring you again.

0:39:09.480 --> 0:39:12.200
<v Speaker 1>I was never exposed to these kinds of vat vacations

0:39:12.239 --> 0:39:15.080
<v Speaker 1>growing up. You're experiencing something that most people never will

0:39:15.080 --> 0:39:16.080
<v Speaker 1>get to experience.

0:39:16.120 --> 0:39:18.399
<v Speaker 3>So I think it's really funny because she's probably seen

0:39:18.440 --> 0:39:20.520
<v Speaker 3>this from like the kids since they were babies, and

0:39:20.520 --> 0:39:23.319
<v Speaker 3>she's like, Okay, they're babies, it's fine, this happens. Their kids,

0:39:23.320 --> 0:39:25.719
<v Speaker 3>It's fine, this happens. Now these are like twenty one

0:39:25.760 --> 0:39:27.680
<v Speaker 3>year old, and she's like, now I can say something.

0:39:27.760 --> 0:39:29.759
<v Speaker 3>Now you're an adult, and I can put you in

0:39:29.800 --> 0:39:32.239
<v Speaker 3>the line of fire because you are not behaving like

0:39:32.239 --> 0:39:33.000
<v Speaker 3>a normal person.

0:39:33.480 --> 0:39:35.359
<v Speaker 1>Do you think there's a tension here, because what I

0:39:35.400 --> 0:39:37.480
<v Speaker 1>saw when she posted this was a lot of rich

0:39:37.520 --> 0:39:39.879
<v Speaker 1>and famous people liking it and saying yes, I'm gonna

0:39:39.920 --> 0:39:44.560
<v Speaker 1>put this on the fridge, Kristen Bell, Chloe Kardashian, someone

0:39:44.560 --> 0:39:47.200
<v Speaker 1>else I've forgotten or like liking it and saying yes.

0:39:47.280 --> 0:39:49.759
<v Speaker 1>And I think that speaks to attention. That's back to

0:39:49.760 --> 0:39:51.759
<v Speaker 1>what we're talking about with the finance Bros, which is

0:39:52.000 --> 0:39:55.520
<v Speaker 1>when someone in the family makes it big, like makes

0:39:55.560 --> 0:39:57.680
<v Speaker 1>it basically has the money and goes I'm going to

0:39:57.719 --> 0:40:01.360
<v Speaker 1>treat the family right. Everyone else the family doesn't necessarily

0:40:01.440 --> 0:40:03.800
<v Speaker 1>know how to behave rich, so when they see free drinks,

0:40:03.840 --> 0:40:05.560
<v Speaker 1>it's like that same how do you behave at a

0:40:05.600 --> 0:40:06.040
<v Speaker 1>free bar?

0:40:06.320 --> 0:40:06.480
<v Speaker 6>Right?

0:40:06.800 --> 0:40:08.760
<v Speaker 1>If you go to a free bar all the time

0:40:08.800 --> 0:40:11.360
<v Speaker 1>for work or whatever, then you're quite cool around a

0:40:11.360 --> 0:40:13.279
<v Speaker 1>free bar. If you never get to go to a

0:40:13.320 --> 0:40:16.239
<v Speaker 1>free bar, you're on the shots, you know what I mean.

0:40:16.600 --> 0:40:19.800
<v Speaker 4>That's never been an ordervatory. I haven't chased it exactly.

0:40:20.440 --> 0:40:22.200
<v Speaker 1>So do you think that's part of this? Do you

0:40:22.239 --> 0:40:25.840
<v Speaker 1>think that the nieces and nephews are like jugs of margaritis.

0:40:26.120 --> 0:40:29.240
<v Speaker 4>That's a great point. I feel icky about it because

0:40:29.400 --> 0:40:33.359
<v Speaker 4>she's also announcing to us all how generous she is. Like,

0:40:33.520 --> 0:40:38.080
<v Speaker 4>in this supposed like affirmation of the importance of treating

0:40:38.120 --> 0:40:42.200
<v Speaker 4>people with respect and decency, she's also telling us, well,

0:40:42.280 --> 0:40:44.920
<v Speaker 4>I took my whole family on holiday, and doesn't that

0:40:44.960 --> 0:40:47.280
<v Speaker 4>make me such a magnanimous, wonderful person.

0:40:47.600 --> 0:40:50.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, there is definitely a humble brag in this, But

0:40:50.560 --> 0:40:53.240
<v Speaker 1>I also think she speaks for a lot of people

0:40:53.360 --> 0:40:57.879
<v Speaker 1>who watch, particularly maybe particularly child free people, but not necessarily,

0:40:58.239 --> 0:41:02.080
<v Speaker 1>who watch the way that kids, even grown up kids,

0:41:02.239 --> 0:41:05.279
<v Speaker 1>treat their mothers in particular, and are outraged by it.

0:41:05.400 --> 0:41:09.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, because she can't say it directly to her siblings,

0:41:09.160 --> 0:41:12.240
<v Speaker 3>so she's like now waiting for her nieces and neverviews

0:41:12.239 --> 0:41:15.080
<v Speaker 3>to become adult so she can talk to them as adults.

0:41:15.200 --> 0:41:17.279
<v Speaker 2>She's like, your kids are brats, is what she wants

0:41:17.320 --> 0:41:17.560
<v Speaker 2>to say.

0:41:18.120 --> 0:41:20.240
<v Speaker 3>They're complaining about their food while they're.

0:41:20.040 --> 0:41:23.600
<v Speaker 4>Eating the same. Don't you think she's also criticizing her

0:41:23.680 --> 0:41:28.240
<v Speaker 4>sisters in that, Like, Holly, if someone criticizes your kids,

0:41:28.360 --> 0:41:32.040
<v Speaker 4>regardless of their age, it is also a criticism of you.

0:41:32.360 --> 0:41:34.000
<v Speaker 2>Oh, any of you.

0:41:34.000 --> 0:41:35.440
<v Speaker 4>You're the one who raised them.

0:41:35.440 --> 0:41:38.760
<v Speaker 1>And that's why you often notice that really fancy people

0:41:38.800 --> 0:41:41.960
<v Speaker 1>like I remember Victoria Beckham for years, whenever she was

0:41:42.000 --> 0:41:43.960
<v Speaker 1>in interviews, this is before all the kids got their

0:41:44.000 --> 0:41:46.799
<v Speaker 1>own profiles, and people would ask her about her kids,

0:41:46.800 --> 0:41:48.560
<v Speaker 1>she'd say, what I'm most proud of is their manner.

0:41:48.600 --> 0:41:50.520
<v Speaker 1>She would always talk about that, and I always thought

0:41:50.560 --> 0:41:52.640
<v Speaker 1>that was a little bit interesting, and then I remembered

0:41:53.000 --> 0:41:55.960
<v Speaker 1>probably the life they live. They're always in fancy restaurants,

0:41:55.960 --> 0:41:58.080
<v Speaker 1>there's always staff around, all that kind of stuff.

0:41:58.360 --> 0:41:59.760
<v Speaker 2>They have been brought.

0:41:59.600 --> 0:42:03.080
<v Speaker 1>Up to be very respectful of that world, because otherwise

0:42:03.120 --> 0:42:05.719
<v Speaker 1>it reflects really badly on posh. Right, if she's in

0:42:05.719 --> 0:42:09.520
<v Speaker 1>a restaurant and Brooklyn and Cruise and whatever a wrestling

0:42:09.600 --> 0:42:13.319
<v Speaker 1>under the table and rolling their eyes and everybody, it

0:42:13.360 --> 0:42:17.000
<v Speaker 1>reflects badly on her. And you're right, Amelia, we're very

0:42:17.040 --> 0:42:19.680
<v Speaker 1>sensitive about that. If somebody calls out one of your

0:42:19.760 --> 0:42:22.080
<v Speaker 1>kids for being a brat, part of you is like, well,

0:42:22.120 --> 0:42:23.760
<v Speaker 1>I know they're being a brat, but then my brat

0:42:23.800 --> 0:42:24.239
<v Speaker 1>back off.

0:42:24.360 --> 0:42:26.360
<v Speaker 4>And also the man is thing. I think the reason

0:42:26.360 --> 0:42:29.799
<v Speaker 4>why you felt that way about what Victoria said is

0:42:29.840 --> 0:42:35.160
<v Speaker 4>because manners are very much something that other people can

0:42:35.280 --> 0:42:39.279
<v Speaker 4>judge your parenting. Yes, it's less like if she just wonded, Like,

0:42:39.520 --> 0:42:41.560
<v Speaker 4>what I'm most proud of is how good they are

0:42:41.600 --> 0:42:44.880
<v Speaker 4>at chess, Like that's a harder thing for a stranger

0:42:45.160 --> 0:42:47.560
<v Speaker 4>or an acquaintance to assess then whether or not they

0:42:47.600 --> 0:42:50.120
<v Speaker 4>say please and thank you. And I'm not saying manners unimportant.

0:42:50.120 --> 0:42:54.000
<v Speaker 4>They are important, but they're also they're also the most

0:42:54.040 --> 0:42:58.160
<v Speaker 4>direct sort of performance review of what you're doing as

0:42:58.160 --> 0:42:58.560
<v Speaker 4>a parent.

0:42:59.480 --> 0:43:02.799
<v Speaker 3>And you can how that she is just really embarrassed

0:43:02.840 --> 0:43:05.960
<v Speaker 3>about their behavior, like coming to the posh back inside

0:43:06.000 --> 0:43:08.600
<v Speaker 3>of things, because in the post she does say you

0:43:08.640 --> 0:43:10.680
<v Speaker 3>can't speak to your mom's like that, or if you

0:43:10.719 --> 0:43:12.279
<v Speaker 3>do do it at home, don't do.

0:43:12.239 --> 0:43:13.280
<v Speaker 4>It in front of other people.

0:43:13.400 --> 0:43:14.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so she doesn't actually care.

0:43:14.719 --> 0:43:16.160
<v Speaker 2>She just like, just don't do it in front of me.

0:43:16.560 --> 0:43:18.279
<v Speaker 1>Do you think never finish out a thing is a

0:43:18.320 --> 0:43:20.239
<v Speaker 1>good rule of thumb for a guest. I think that

0:43:20.280 --> 0:43:21.880
<v Speaker 1>I was quite I think that's quite clever.

0:43:22.000 --> 0:43:22.919
<v Speaker 4>I think it's really cool.

0:43:23.120 --> 0:43:24.960
<v Speaker 3>What depends what it is, like you're gonna let it

0:43:25.280 --> 0:43:27.879
<v Speaker 3>take it's like then it's just gonna go away.

0:43:27.920 --> 0:43:30.279
<v Speaker 4>But I also feel like Chelsea Handla literally just walks

0:43:30.320 --> 0:43:33.960
<v Speaker 4>around with you know how King Charles famously has someone

0:43:34.440 --> 0:43:37.319
<v Speaker 4>travel with him everywhere who makes martinis. Yeah, that brings

0:43:37.320 --> 0:43:40.160
<v Speaker 4>along a little mobile martini cut. She's like that except

0:43:40.160 --> 0:43:42.879
<v Speaker 4>for Margaarita's. So if you finish the picture, don't worry,

0:43:42.880 --> 0:43:43.760
<v Speaker 4>there's another one coming.

0:43:45.719 --> 0:43:49.480
<v Speaker 1>Do you think that Chelsea Handler's sisters are speaking to

0:43:49.520 --> 0:43:52.800
<v Speaker 1>her today after she did that and it went completely viral?

0:43:53.400 --> 0:43:54.160
<v Speaker 2>How would you be?

0:43:54.360 --> 0:43:57.560
<v Speaker 3>I'd be like, hey, Sis, sorry we didn't reply to

0:43:57.600 --> 0:44:00.680
<v Speaker 3>your email quick enough. We all have jobs, were all

0:44:00.719 --> 0:44:03.520
<v Speaker 3>really really busy. Can we just talk about how you

0:44:03.600 --> 0:44:07.360
<v Speaker 3>posted it on Instagram? The kids are really upset. We

0:44:07.480 --> 0:44:09.880
<v Speaker 3>promise we'll be better behaved than the next family holiday.

0:44:09.920 --> 0:44:10.680
<v Speaker 3>We'd love to hear from you.

0:44:10.760 --> 0:44:11.960
<v Speaker 2>Thanks. I bet they're not good enough.

0:44:12.080 --> 0:44:12.520
<v Speaker 4>It's been good.

0:44:12.600 --> 0:44:14.480
<v Speaker 2>Next year, I bet it's not happening.

0:44:15.360 --> 0:44:17.320
<v Speaker 1>That is all we have time for today, out loudest,

0:44:17.320 --> 0:44:19.240
<v Speaker 1>thank you for being here with us on this Monday.

0:44:19.280 --> 0:44:21.799
<v Speaker 1>As always, we're going to be back in your ears tomorrow.

0:44:22.000 --> 0:44:25.000
<v Speaker 1>At least m and I are with Mia and some scoreless.

0:44:26.800 --> 0:44:27.760
<v Speaker 2>We'll see you tomorrow.

0:44:27.840 --> 0:44:32.680
<v Speaker 3>Bye bye. Mamma May acknowledges to traditional owners of the

0:44:32.760 --> 0:44:34.799
<v Speaker 3>land on which we recorded this podcast.