WEBVTT - The Red Carpet Moment That Answers The Blake Lively Question

0:00:03.040 --> 0:00:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Hello and welcome to Mamma Mia out Loud. It's what

0:00:06.200 --> 0:00:09.640
<v Speaker 1>women are actually talking about on Wednesday, sixth of May.

0:00:10.280 --> 0:00:12.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm Holly Wainwright and the first thing I'm going to do,

0:00:12.600 --> 0:00:16.079
<v Speaker 1>the first order of business, very simple out louder is

0:00:16.280 --> 0:00:19.159
<v Speaker 1>if you love your show, please vote for us in

0:00:19.200 --> 0:00:22.720
<v Speaker 1>the upcoming Australian Audio Awards as a People's Choice category.

0:00:23.040 --> 0:00:25.360
<v Speaker 1>It's really straightforward. We're going to put a link in

0:00:25.400 --> 0:00:27.000
<v Speaker 1>the show notes, We're probably going to put it on

0:00:27.000 --> 0:00:29.840
<v Speaker 1>social We're going to put it everywhere. We would love

0:00:29.920 --> 0:00:32.239
<v Speaker 1>your support to help us get there. That is the

0:00:32.320 --> 0:00:34.080
<v Speaker 1>end of my manifesto for the day.

0:00:34.400 --> 0:00:36.159
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Well, I just would like to say as a

0:00:36.200 --> 0:00:39.680
<v Speaker 2>lazy girl that there are all these things to fill out.

0:00:39.760 --> 0:00:41.240
<v Speaker 3>You only have to fill us out.

0:00:41.320 --> 0:00:43.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you don't have to do everything is just tick

0:00:43.960 --> 0:00:44.760
<v Speaker 1>Mama Mia out Loud.

0:00:44.840 --> 0:00:48.000
<v Speaker 3>So important for the lazy girls out there, and as

0:00:48.200 --> 0:00:50.760
<v Speaker 3>as a bossy girl, I just concur with Holly. I

0:00:50.800 --> 0:00:53.960
<v Speaker 3>know you can make that ask of people, and I

0:00:53.960 --> 0:00:56.760
<v Speaker 3>think that's a great step towards greet our self assertive.

0:00:57.120 --> 0:01:01.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm growing, I'm growing, Amelia Growing. I'm Amelia Lester and

0:01:01.600 --> 0:01:04.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm Claire Stephen and here's what's made our agenda for today.

0:01:05.880 --> 0:01:09.680
<v Speaker 1>So now that it's all over and many damning text

0:01:09.760 --> 0:01:13.759
<v Speaker 1>messages scatter the ruins of what was the biggest celebrity

0:01:13.800 --> 0:01:16.680
<v Speaker 1>story for a couple of years, Just who did win

0:01:17.040 --> 0:01:21.720
<v Speaker 1>in the whole? Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni court case drama.

0:01:22.160 --> 0:01:25.920
<v Speaker 3>Plus Cameron Diaz is a mother again at fifty three,

0:01:26.280 --> 0:01:28.160
<v Speaker 3>and Holly has some thoughts.

0:01:28.440 --> 0:01:32.880
<v Speaker 2>And veteran broadcaster James Valentine filmed the last year of

0:01:32.920 --> 0:01:36.560
<v Speaker 2>his life for the ABC, and between a living wake

0:01:36.720 --> 0:01:40.480
<v Speaker 2>and his openness around voluntary assisted dying, he's opened a

0:01:40.520 --> 0:01:44.119
<v Speaker 2>conversation around what it means to die a good death.

0:01:44.760 --> 0:01:47.800
<v Speaker 1>But first, Amelia Lester, the Mecgala.

0:01:47.920 --> 0:01:50.320
<v Speaker 3>Did it feel different this year? A lot of people

0:01:50.360 --> 0:01:53.640
<v Speaker 3>said that it did. Amy Odell, a fashion writer, wrote

0:01:53.640 --> 0:01:56.840
<v Speaker 3>in her background newsletter that the Metgala was all money,

0:01:57.040 --> 0:02:00.640
<v Speaker 3>no soul, and she wasn't alone in this criticism. Basically,

0:02:00.680 --> 0:02:04.559
<v Speaker 3>people are saying that because Jeff Bezos and his wife

0:02:04.640 --> 0:02:08.440
<v Speaker 3>Lauren Sanchez Bezos sponsored the event, it just started to

0:02:08.480 --> 0:02:12.400
<v Speaker 3>feel a little craven, a little gross, and less fun

0:02:12.440 --> 0:02:14.560
<v Speaker 3>than it used to be. So there were a lot

0:02:14.600 --> 0:02:16.400
<v Speaker 3>of protests in New York. In the lead up to

0:02:16.440 --> 0:02:19.519
<v Speaker 3>the event, they were all centered around Amazon's labor practices,

0:02:19.639 --> 0:02:23.320
<v Speaker 3>its environmental damage. And then there are those who say, no,

0:02:23.600 --> 0:02:26.440
<v Speaker 3>that's not true. The mech color's always been about rich

0:02:26.520 --> 0:02:29.440
<v Speaker 3>people giving their money towards a good cause, which is

0:02:29.480 --> 0:02:32.839
<v Speaker 3>the Metropolitan Museum's Costume Institute. And look, they did raise

0:02:32.880 --> 0:02:35.440
<v Speaker 3>a lot of money on Monday night. The Bezos has

0:02:35.520 --> 0:02:38.240
<v Speaker 3>bought the event for about ten million dollars, but then

0:02:38.400 --> 0:02:41.200
<v Speaker 3>the event itself raised about forty one million. This is

0:02:41.320 --> 0:02:43.720
<v Speaker 3>US dollars, which is a lot for this event. It's

0:02:43.720 --> 0:02:47.480
<v Speaker 3>apparently kind of record breaking. So are we just complaining

0:02:47.520 --> 0:02:53.040
<v Speaker 3>about nothing, Holly? Do you feel like celebrities stayed away?

0:02:53.200 --> 0:02:55.519
<v Speaker 3>Did they agree that this was a sort of off

0:02:55.760 --> 0:02:56.640
<v Speaker 3>event this year?

0:02:58.000 --> 0:02:59.560
<v Speaker 1>So I'm going to give you a list of the

0:03:00.000 --> 0:03:04.680
<v Speaker 1>celebrities who people say boycotted, because none of the people

0:03:05.080 --> 0:03:08.799
<v Speaker 1>so far who everyone is saying has boycott had actually

0:03:08.880 --> 0:03:10.359
<v Speaker 1>verbalized that they were boycott.

0:03:10.400 --> 0:03:13.600
<v Speaker 3>Well, we are boycotted, which we just had to take

0:03:13.639 --> 0:03:15.040
<v Speaker 3>a stand because.

0:03:14.840 --> 0:03:17.840
<v Speaker 1>I do feel a little bit like what soul when

0:03:17.880 --> 0:03:19.720
<v Speaker 1>you said it's all money those salt like, I do

0:03:19.760 --> 0:03:21.520
<v Speaker 1>feel a bit that I don't think this is the

0:03:21.560 --> 0:03:24.680
<v Speaker 1>first year. It has been pointed out in the culture,

0:03:24.720 --> 0:03:27.880
<v Speaker 1>particularly since trump Ism and all those things, that this

0:03:28.040 --> 0:03:32.919
<v Speaker 1>feels very hunger games. Yes, yes, and I know although

0:03:32.960 --> 0:03:36.200
<v Speaker 1>there's a more direct link here, you know, with the

0:03:36.200 --> 0:03:38.720
<v Speaker 1>Bezos is buying it. I do feel like Jeff sort

0:03:38.720 --> 0:03:41.120
<v Speaker 1>of bought it for Lauren as a gift, which is

0:03:41.160 --> 0:03:44.320
<v Speaker 1>a nice gift. Nice, but it feels more avert. So anyway,

0:03:44.400 --> 0:03:46.520
<v Speaker 1>let's look at this because when I was watching it

0:03:46.600 --> 0:03:48.800
<v Speaker 1>on Tuesday and then I did a subscriber episode with

0:03:48.840 --> 0:03:50.200
<v Speaker 1>me as straight afterwards, I was like, well, all the

0:03:50.240 --> 0:03:53.240
<v Speaker 1>celebrities are there, like Beyonce's there. All the famous people

0:03:53.280 --> 0:03:54.840
<v Speaker 1>I was expecting to be there were there.

0:03:54.840 --> 0:03:56.800
<v Speaker 2>Well, actually a lot of famous feom we didn't expect

0:03:56.840 --> 0:03:57.560
<v Speaker 2>to be there were there.

0:03:57.640 --> 0:03:59.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. And then it was pointed out to me who

0:03:59.840 --> 0:04:04.960
<v Speaker 1>was not Billie Eilish. Now that tracks because she doesn't

0:04:05.000 --> 0:04:07.560
<v Speaker 1>like billionaires, and she remembers she gave a speech a

0:04:07.560 --> 0:04:09.600
<v Speaker 1>while ago where she said, you lot give more of

0:04:09.640 --> 0:04:11.880
<v Speaker 1>your money away. So I don't think she would have

0:04:11.920 --> 0:04:14.440
<v Speaker 1>been either welcome or willing to go, because Jeff might

0:04:14.480 --> 0:04:16.159
<v Speaker 1>have worried that she was going to shake him down

0:04:16.200 --> 0:04:20.000
<v Speaker 1>in the bathroom to share more of his money. Zoe Saldana,

0:04:20.279 --> 0:04:23.039
<v Speaker 1>she is somebody who is usually there. She was not there.

0:04:23.320 --> 0:04:25.839
<v Speaker 1>She is almost as rich as the billionaires. She is

0:04:25.880 --> 0:04:29.480
<v Speaker 1>an unbelievably well paid actress because of her Marvel and

0:04:29.560 --> 0:04:33.560
<v Speaker 1>Avatar connections. So Zoe's at home count of dollars. Olivia

0:04:33.640 --> 0:04:36.599
<v Speaker 1>Rodrigo that tracks too. She is political, That would not

0:04:36.680 --> 0:04:38.960
<v Speaker 1>be surprising. She's in the middle of an album promo,

0:04:39.080 --> 0:04:41.760
<v Speaker 1>so you might have usually expected her to be there.

0:04:43.080 --> 0:04:47.880
<v Speaker 1>Lady Gaga an interesting one because she could have been

0:04:47.920 --> 0:04:50.080
<v Speaker 1>expected to be there because she's in The Devil Wears

0:04:50.080 --> 0:04:52.239
<v Speaker 1>prior of Too and the rest of the Well. Meryl

0:04:52.279 --> 0:04:55.360
<v Speaker 1>wasn't there, but Meryl never goes, so that's not surprising.

0:04:55.800 --> 0:04:58.840
<v Speaker 1>But Anne Hath the way Emily Blunt Stanley Tucci were

0:04:58.880 --> 0:04:59.360
<v Speaker 1>all there.

0:05:00.080 --> 0:05:04.080
<v Speaker 2>Stanley Tucci with Emily blount sister, it's always fun.

0:05:04.880 --> 0:05:08.760
<v Speaker 1>So maybe Gaga, but also she's kind of said lately

0:05:08.800 --> 0:05:10.800
<v Speaker 1>that she's going to focus on promoting things she wants

0:05:10.839 --> 0:05:14.880
<v Speaker 1>to promote rather than just being around. Lewis Hamilton come on,

0:05:15.440 --> 0:05:20.800
<v Speaker 1>like he's literally dating Kim Kardashian, who's extremely bezos adjacent.

0:05:21.200 --> 0:05:22.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that was a political.

0:05:22.760 --> 0:05:25.680
<v Speaker 3>Let's get to the big guns. Some were missing, right,

0:05:26.000 --> 0:05:29.560
<v Speaker 3>some who we might have realized. Sarah Jessica Parker.

0:05:29.680 --> 0:05:34.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so, Sarah Jessica I reckon. That is probably I

0:05:34.320 --> 0:05:37.440
<v Speaker 1>would say that's almost definitely a boycott. But she went

0:05:37.480 --> 0:05:39.840
<v Speaker 1>to support Anna at a dinner, but she didn't.

0:05:39.640 --> 0:05:41.640
<v Speaker 3>Go to the There was a dinner on the weekend

0:05:41.720 --> 0:05:44.080
<v Speaker 3>before the gala. It probably would have been more fun.

0:05:44.080 --> 0:05:47.080
<v Speaker 1>Anyways, she said anything, No, she hasn't, but she I

0:05:47.120 --> 0:05:50.400
<v Speaker 1>think she was in support of the New New York mayor. Right,

0:05:52.440 --> 0:05:54.920
<v Speaker 1>And obviously he didn't go, but then I wouldn't have

0:05:55.000 --> 0:05:57.840
<v Speaker 1>expected him to go, and he did post about it.

0:05:57.880 --> 0:06:00.520
<v Speaker 1>They posted a series of let's sell a the real

0:06:00.600 --> 0:06:03.640
<v Speaker 1>heroes of fashion and you know, celebrated workers behind the

0:06:03.640 --> 0:06:07.200
<v Speaker 1>scenes and particular designers and things. So yes, so Sarah

0:06:07.279 --> 0:06:10.480
<v Speaker 1>Jessica Parker I reckon could be a boycott. But then

0:06:10.520 --> 0:06:13.200
<v Speaker 1>they're saying, you know, j Lo, I don't think Jalo

0:06:13.360 --> 0:06:15.279
<v Speaker 1>was boycotting. I just think she's tired.

0:06:15.480 --> 0:06:16.200
<v Speaker 3>Harry Styles.

0:06:16.240 --> 0:06:18.800
<v Speaker 1>Harry Styles is in the middle of record of rehearsing

0:06:18.880 --> 0:06:21.840
<v Speaker 1>for his tour. He's in a studio in bethnal Green

0:06:22.080 --> 0:06:25.640
<v Speaker 1>running through it. Not that I've been stalking him. Justin Bieber,

0:06:25.680 --> 0:06:28.720
<v Speaker 1>he's just done Coachella. Boy needs to lie down. Miley

0:06:29.000 --> 0:06:32.400
<v Speaker 1>Taylor Swift, she never goes, and I don't think she's so.

0:06:32.480 --> 0:06:35.159
<v Speaker 1>I think that some of the boycott cots are not

0:06:36.600 --> 0:06:37.120
<v Speaker 1>boy I.

0:06:37.040 --> 0:06:40.240
<v Speaker 3>Think that's right. But it's interesting that some of the

0:06:40.360 --> 0:06:42.960
<v Speaker 3>tech billionaires it clearly got to them a little bit.

0:06:43.080 --> 0:06:45.960
<v Speaker 3>So it's interesting that Jeff did not walk the red

0:06:46.000 --> 0:06:49.159
<v Speaker 3>carpet with Lauren. That's very unusual. They do everything together.

0:06:49.240 --> 0:06:52.279
<v Speaker 3>We've learned this from various pieces about them and Lauren's

0:06:52.400 --> 0:06:56.320
<v Speaker 3>dress being very boring. Do we think that was intentional.

0:06:56.120 --> 0:06:59.240
<v Speaker 1>A little bit understated for Lauren, Yeah, but I think

0:06:59.279 --> 0:07:02.240
<v Speaker 1>it was had a very specific art reference. It was

0:07:02.279 --> 0:07:04.440
<v Speaker 1>the same dress as someone called Madame X and it's

0:07:04.480 --> 0:07:05.680
<v Speaker 1>like scandalous women.

0:07:06.480 --> 0:07:10.040
<v Speaker 3>Yep. It's interesting though, because Jeff did walk the carpet

0:07:10.080 --> 0:07:14.120
<v Speaker 3>in twenty thirteen when Amazon sponsored the event. There was

0:07:14.120 --> 0:07:16.560
<v Speaker 3>no outrage back then when Amazon sponsored the event and

0:07:16.600 --> 0:07:20.600
<v Speaker 3>he walked with Mackenzie then Mackenzie Bezos his wife at

0:07:20.600 --> 0:07:25.320
<v Speaker 3>the time. Mark Zuckerberg also made his Met Gala debut

0:07:25.600 --> 0:07:28.080
<v Speaker 3>with his wife, Priscilla Chan, and they also didn't walk

0:07:28.120 --> 0:07:30.400
<v Speaker 3>the red carpet, which I thought was interesting because it's

0:07:30.480 --> 0:07:31.960
<v Speaker 3>kind of like, well, you want to be at the

0:07:31.960 --> 0:07:35.160
<v Speaker 3>glamorous event, but you don't want the attention of being there.

0:07:35.280 --> 0:07:38.400
<v Speaker 1>Do you think they might have been encouraged not to.

0:07:39.280 --> 0:07:42.800
<v Speaker 3>I don't think anyone encourages Mark Zuckerberg and Jeff Bezos

0:07:42.880 --> 0:07:47.600
<v Speaker 3>to do anything would have worked exactly. But there were

0:07:47.680 --> 0:07:50.680
<v Speaker 3>some tech willionaires who did walk the carpet. Google founder

0:07:50.800 --> 0:07:53.520
<v Speaker 3>Sergei Brinn. He showed up on the red carpet with

0:07:53.560 --> 0:07:57.800
<v Speaker 3>his girlfriend. Her name is Gaylyn Gilbert Soto. The New

0:07:57.880 --> 0:08:03.200
<v Speaker 3>York Times describes her as a con conservative gut health influencer.

0:08:03.160 --> 0:08:08.360
<v Speaker 1>That is one of the six job title Claire.

0:08:08.200 --> 0:08:11.360
<v Speaker 3>Do you think that there's something inherently conservative about gut health?

0:08:11.520 --> 0:08:15.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, because gut health is very don't take antibiotics and

0:08:15.680 --> 0:08:18.280
<v Speaker 2>don't take antibiotics is very That's what it's.

0:08:19.000 --> 0:08:21.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, which used to be a sort

0:08:21.360 --> 0:08:25.200
<v Speaker 1>of crunchy hippie vibe, but these days has come back

0:08:25.240 --> 0:08:25.640
<v Speaker 1>around it.

0:08:25.760 --> 0:08:27.600
<v Speaker 3>I thought it was just you know, drink your com

0:08:27.760 --> 0:08:29.920
<v Speaker 3>your chart, but no, it means it can.

0:08:29.840 --> 0:08:32.959
<v Speaker 2>Be very I feel like there's it's a short road

0:08:33.120 --> 0:08:38.200
<v Speaker 2>from like gut health gut health to to anti vacs.

0:08:38.440 --> 0:08:43.800
<v Speaker 2>Don't ever give your children antibiotics with my sour crow.

0:08:45.200 --> 0:08:47.080
<v Speaker 3>And of course I'm AROUNDA was there. I just have

0:08:47.160 --> 0:08:51.040
<v Speaker 3>to add she was there with Snapchat founder Evanstein on

0:08:51.080 --> 0:08:52.320
<v Speaker 3>the carpet, of course.

0:08:52.559 --> 0:08:55.079
<v Speaker 1>Possibly the biggest gun that I haven't mentioned though, is Zendaya.

0:08:56.320 --> 0:08:59.800
<v Speaker 1>She does always go. Usually she didn't go, and that

0:09:00.320 --> 0:09:02.760
<v Speaker 1>read like a boycott. And some people are saying, if

0:09:02.760 --> 0:09:06.160
<v Speaker 1>your boycotting, say you're boycotting. I don't think so necessarily.

0:09:06.200 --> 0:09:09.040
<v Speaker 1>You don't want to necessarily make everything about your politics.

0:09:09.120 --> 0:09:11.120
<v Speaker 1>But I just have one question. I think that big

0:09:11.240 --> 0:09:15.200
<v Speaker 1>charity galas of all types have always been, have always

0:09:15.200 --> 0:09:19.319
<v Speaker 1>reflected the moment therein and they've always been a path

0:09:19.520 --> 0:09:23.760
<v Speaker 1>to accessing status in a particular society. Watch the Gilded Age,

0:09:23.800 --> 0:09:24.559
<v Speaker 1>It's all about that.

0:09:25.160 --> 0:09:27.880
<v Speaker 3>And Nixon notably said that she thought it was great

0:09:27.880 --> 0:09:28.720
<v Speaker 3>that the mayor didn't go.

0:09:29.080 --> 0:09:31.640
<v Speaker 1>Yes, but like you know, you're reflecting the time. So

0:09:31.720 --> 0:09:34.560
<v Speaker 1>you're going a big gala ball is the way you

0:09:34.600 --> 0:09:37.160
<v Speaker 1>get all the fancy people together. This being a tech

0:09:37.240 --> 0:09:41.400
<v Speaker 1>bro billionaire ball is very reflective of the moment we're

0:09:41.400 --> 0:09:43.800
<v Speaker 1>living in, right, So is it surprising in any way

0:09:44.000 --> 0:09:46.000
<v Speaker 1>in the nineteen eighties New York society. It was all

0:09:46.000 --> 0:09:49.160
<v Speaker 1>about glitz and flash and Donald Trump, and now we're

0:09:49.200 --> 0:09:51.520
<v Speaker 1>like again, I don't know. I kind of feel like,

0:09:51.559 --> 0:09:53.200
<v Speaker 1>what did we expect to happen?

0:09:53.280 --> 0:09:55.640
<v Speaker 3>No, that's right, But I think that the group that

0:09:55.679 --> 0:09:58.640
<v Speaker 3>people are most angry at it's not the people who

0:09:58.720 --> 0:10:01.680
<v Speaker 3>went in their pretty dresses. It's not the people who

0:10:01.720 --> 0:10:04.320
<v Speaker 3>didn't go and stay quiet about it. It's the people

0:10:04.360 --> 0:10:06.760
<v Speaker 3>who went but then tried to have their cake and

0:10:06.800 --> 0:10:08.079
<v Speaker 3>eat it too. See.

0:10:08.160 --> 0:10:12.080
<v Speaker 2>I'm not as frustrated about this because Sarah Paulson is

0:10:12.120 --> 0:10:15.760
<v Speaker 2>getting a hole at a crap because she wore a

0:10:15.840 --> 0:10:19.560
<v Speaker 2>dress that then and then had a blindfold that was

0:10:19.559 --> 0:10:22.680
<v Speaker 2>a dollar bill, and it was people like it's making

0:10:22.679 --> 0:10:25.559
<v Speaker 2>a statement about about like eating the rich.

0:10:25.679 --> 0:10:27.920
<v Speaker 3>Well, she herself said that it was a statement about

0:10:27.920 --> 0:10:28.280
<v Speaker 3>the one.

0:10:28.120 --> 0:10:31.480
<v Speaker 2>Besides yes, and and I thought that was like a

0:10:31.559 --> 0:10:34.600
<v Speaker 2>far swing. But the dress is actually called like the

0:10:34.640 --> 0:10:38.760
<v Speaker 2>one percent by the artist, the designer who designed it,

0:10:39.280 --> 0:10:42.800
<v Speaker 2>and the mask was called blinded by Money, and it

0:10:42.920 --> 0:10:46.400
<v Speaker 2>was a statement on greed and corruption that comes with

0:10:46.440 --> 0:10:49.200
<v Speaker 2>extreme power. I think it's a little bit unfair to

0:10:49.240 --> 0:10:51.240
<v Speaker 2>look at her and say, well, you've got a net

0:10:51.280 --> 0:10:54.960
<v Speaker 2>worth of twelve million dollars at which how does anyone

0:10:55.000 --> 0:10:57.760
<v Speaker 2>calculate anyone's net worth on the internet? But you have

0:10:57.800 --> 0:10:59.560
<v Speaker 2>a net worth of that you're at this event, how

0:10:59.640 --> 0:11:02.760
<v Speaker 2>dare you then make a protest when it's like, well,

0:11:03.880 --> 0:11:06.000
<v Speaker 2>isn't that exactly how how you do it?

0:11:06.120 --> 0:11:08.360
<v Speaker 3>Don't you go in? And well, people do have a

0:11:08.480 --> 0:11:13.120
<v Speaker 3>history of using that platform. So Alexandra Ocazio Cortez, who

0:11:13.200 --> 0:11:17.719
<v Speaker 3>is a Democratic congresswoman from New York, famously wore a

0:11:18.120 --> 0:11:22.319
<v Speaker 3>dress on the Megala red carpet a couple of years

0:11:22.320 --> 0:11:26.280
<v Speaker 3>ago which said tax the rich. But people actually have

0:11:26.360 --> 0:11:28.920
<v Speaker 3>the same criticism for her. To your point, Holly, the

0:11:28.960 --> 0:11:32.720
<v Speaker 3>met Gala in some corners has always been seen as

0:11:32.840 --> 0:11:37.040
<v Speaker 3>a kind of repulsive show of excess and decadence, and

0:11:37.200 --> 0:11:39.680
<v Speaker 3>she got a lot of aoc got a lot of

0:11:39.760 --> 0:11:43.120
<v Speaker 3>flak for even attending the event back then, reading the

0:11:43.200 --> 0:11:45.600
<v Speaker 3>canapasey while saying.

0:11:45.840 --> 0:11:48.640
<v Speaker 1>You guys are discussing while Charlie free directions.

0:11:48.679 --> 0:11:54.080
<v Speaker 2>But if you're not there, you don't have a microphone

0:11:54.120 --> 0:11:56.880
<v Speaker 2>to say anything about the event, do you know? Well,

0:11:57.080 --> 0:11:58.920
<v Speaker 2>I guess you do. I guess like Vende could opposed

0:11:58.920 --> 0:11:59.640
<v Speaker 2>to something on Instagram.

0:11:59.679 --> 0:12:03.080
<v Speaker 3>If you want Zendaya not going definitely took the air

0:12:03.160 --> 0:12:05.640
<v Speaker 3>out of the room when that announcement came out, And

0:12:05.679 --> 0:12:07.360
<v Speaker 3>I guess it wasn't an announcement so much as a

0:12:07.400 --> 0:12:11.920
<v Speaker 3>news update. Everyone kind of went, that's big. When Zendeia's

0:12:11.960 --> 0:12:13.200
<v Speaker 3>not there, it's big.

0:12:13.040 --> 0:12:15.480
<v Speaker 2>Because she's always one of the coolest on the carpet.

0:12:15.559 --> 0:12:19.640
<v Speaker 2>Does something really original, remember that, like bloody light up

0:12:19.760 --> 0:12:20.320
<v Speaker 2>dress and she.

0:12:21.080 --> 0:12:25.079
<v Speaker 3>Oh, but there was a bathroom selfie. Some things always

0:12:25.080 --> 0:12:27.080
<v Speaker 3>stay the same, right, and you saw this by Yes,

0:12:27.160 --> 0:12:29.640
<v Speaker 3>it's always an iconic bathroom selfie. It's always the thing

0:12:29.679 --> 0:12:32.079
<v Speaker 3>you want to look for. And there was an amazing

0:12:32.160 --> 0:12:35.080
<v Speaker 3>one that had you know, the Margo Robbie all the

0:12:35.080 --> 0:12:36.520
<v Speaker 3>people in it. But one of the things that was

0:12:36.600 --> 0:12:39.160
<v Speaker 3>most striking about that And so I saw that in

0:12:39.200 --> 0:12:41.760
<v Speaker 3>the wild last night and I was like, why is

0:12:41.760 --> 0:12:44.080
<v Speaker 3>there an exceptionally beautiful woman in the middle of that

0:12:44.120 --> 0:12:47.080
<v Speaker 3>who is wearing a quarter zip sweatshirt? I was like,

0:12:47.520 --> 0:12:48.760
<v Speaker 3>was she at that party?

0:12:49.520 --> 0:12:52.160
<v Speaker 1>And then it's having a lot of headlines today because

0:12:52.160 --> 0:12:54.160
<v Speaker 1>she is actually a very famous model.

0:12:54.360 --> 0:12:56.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I actually love the story behind this. Her name

0:12:57.040 --> 0:13:02.280
<v Speaker 3>is Bavitha Mandava and she that what she wore was

0:13:02.280 --> 0:13:06.360
<v Speaker 3>a quarterzip jumper essentially and what looked like jeans. It

0:13:06.400 --> 0:13:08.280
<v Speaker 3>turns out they weren't just any jeans. The jeans were

0:13:08.360 --> 0:13:12.000
<v Speaker 3>made with silk muslin and had a blue denim effect.

0:13:12.240 --> 0:13:16.120
<v Speaker 3>My jeans today have a blue denim effect. And it's

0:13:16.160 --> 0:13:21.240
<v Speaker 3>a very important iconic look because she opened Chanell's show

0:13:21.360 --> 0:13:23.360
<v Speaker 3>in December, which was on the New York City Subway,

0:13:23.760 --> 0:13:27.319
<v Speaker 3>wearing essentially that outfit, and the fashion world lost their mind.

0:13:27.559 --> 0:13:31.400
<v Speaker 3>That show was like considered extremely groundbreaking, and she was

0:13:31.440 --> 0:13:33.880
<v Speaker 3>the first Indian model to open a Chanel show and

0:13:33.920 --> 0:13:37.720
<v Speaker 3>she is now the first South Asian ambassador for Chanel.

0:13:37.800 --> 0:13:40.120
<v Speaker 3>And incidentally, did you notice that Margot Robbie, who was

0:13:40.160 --> 0:13:42.040
<v Speaker 3>also Chanel ambassador, It was right next to her in

0:13:42.040 --> 0:13:44.640
<v Speaker 3>that photo. So Chanell must have been just so happy

0:13:44.679 --> 0:13:45.440
<v Speaker 3>about the whole thing.

0:13:45.480 --> 0:13:47.760
<v Speaker 1>I know, but it just she just looked so out

0:13:47.760 --> 0:13:48.280
<v Speaker 1>of place.

0:13:48.360 --> 0:13:49.839
<v Speaker 3>But that's what made it so good.

0:13:50.040 --> 0:13:53.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but I was like wandered into the shop. But

0:13:53.400 --> 0:13:55.720
<v Speaker 1>she also read all about it and I was amazing.

0:13:55.760 --> 0:14:00.679
<v Speaker 1>Yet she didn't have to have a bubble machine boobs.

0:14:01.559 --> 0:14:04.560
<v Speaker 3>And then that look that she wore on the Chanel

0:14:04.760 --> 0:14:07.400
<v Speaker 3>catwalk was actually a nod in turn to how she

0:14:07.480 --> 0:14:09.640
<v Speaker 3>was discovered. I love this so much. She was a

0:14:09.679 --> 0:14:12.480
<v Speaker 3>grad student m YU and she was discovered on the

0:14:12.520 --> 0:14:16.520
<v Speaker 3>New York City subway waiting for a train. One would

0:14:16.559 --> 0:14:19.480
<v Speaker 3>imagine probably wearing a similar outfit to the one she

0:14:19.640 --> 0:14:23.480
<v Speaker 3>is now wearing in a much more fabulous incarnation at

0:14:23.480 --> 0:14:24.080
<v Speaker 3>the metgala.

0:14:24.240 --> 0:14:27.239
<v Speaker 1>But you were obsessed with another red carpet walk.

0:14:27.200 --> 0:14:33.280
<v Speaker 2>Yes, because I am a basic bitch. If, like I swear,

0:14:33.400 --> 0:14:35.920
<v Speaker 2>if there was like a thermometer for like, what's what

0:14:36.080 --> 0:14:38.480
<v Speaker 2>does the basic bitch think about anything that's happening in

0:14:38.520 --> 0:14:40.280
<v Speaker 2>the world right now? It comes over me and it's

0:14:40.320 --> 0:14:43.520
<v Speaker 2>like bing bing bing bing bing because I saw the

0:14:43.560 --> 0:14:47.240
<v Speaker 2>red carpet photos of Hugh Jackman in Suton Foster and

0:14:47.320 --> 0:14:50.080
<v Speaker 2>I think I was sitting opposite you and Holly and I.

0:14:50.640 --> 0:14:57.280
<v Speaker 3>Said, oh oh, was like I don't and I'm like,

0:14:57.400 --> 0:14:57.720
<v Speaker 3>howm my.

0:14:57.840 --> 0:14:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Here has it been?

0:14:58.760 --> 0:15:01.960
<v Speaker 3>Now? Not that many at least well he was.

0:15:02.320 --> 0:15:04.960
<v Speaker 2>Hugh Jackman was on the Red carpet with Debory Furnace

0:15:05.000 --> 0:15:05.960
<v Speaker 2>in twenty twenty three.

0:15:06.080 --> 0:15:09.480
<v Speaker 3>My group chats are very divided on this. Some love

0:15:09.600 --> 0:15:12.600
<v Speaker 3>the two of them together and some are talking about

0:15:12.720 --> 0:15:13.680
<v Speaker 3>deb Prowley.

0:15:13.880 --> 0:15:17.560
<v Speaker 1>Do you have to not debut your relationship after a

0:15:17.600 --> 0:15:20.800
<v Speaker 1>divorce five years, ten years? What do we want?

0:15:21.520 --> 0:15:24.160
<v Speaker 2>There are no rules, but I am allowed to go

0:15:24.440 --> 0:15:27.760
<v Speaker 2>oh poor deb Oh, no, I hate that I am allowed.

0:15:27.840 --> 0:15:31.560
<v Speaker 2>And then the tabloids, because again I'm a basic bitch.

0:15:31.600 --> 0:15:33.920
<v Speaker 2>The tabloids were like, hey, basic bitches, We've made up

0:15:33.920 --> 0:15:38.160
<v Speaker 2>a story for you. So there are sources in Inverata

0:15:38.200 --> 0:15:43.080
<v Speaker 2>commas who say that Debrale Furnace was a huge fan

0:15:43.440 --> 0:15:46.800
<v Speaker 2>of the event and the decision to bring Sutton Foster

0:15:47.000 --> 0:15:50.720
<v Speaker 2>was a final blow to deb And what I didn't

0:15:50.720 --> 0:15:53.760
<v Speaker 2>realize when I went really deep on this was some

0:15:53.920 --> 0:15:56.560
<v Speaker 2>Foster's wearing a ring, like they think that you proposed

0:15:56.560 --> 0:15:58.320
<v Speaker 2>in January and they think they're going to have some

0:15:58.360 --> 0:15:59.240
<v Speaker 2>trend in your wedding.

0:15:59.360 --> 0:16:01.040
<v Speaker 1>And is that all are not allowed? He's not allowed

0:16:01.080 --> 0:16:02.680
<v Speaker 1>to marry again, not ever, not ever.

0:16:03.280 --> 0:16:04.920
<v Speaker 3>I I don't know about that.

0:16:05.040 --> 0:16:07.560
<v Speaker 1>How do you know that, Deborah Lee Furness. This is

0:16:07.560 --> 0:16:10.560
<v Speaker 1>what I don't like about this narrative is it victimizes

0:16:10.600 --> 0:16:13.000
<v Speaker 1>a woman who maybe is totally done with that, you

0:16:13.040 --> 0:16:15.440
<v Speaker 1>know what I mean. She obviously she made up some

0:16:15.480 --> 0:16:17.920
<v Speaker 1>statements that made it clear she was not happy when

0:16:17.960 --> 0:16:22.080
<v Speaker 1>that relationship broke down, But again three years ago, so

0:16:22.360 --> 0:16:25.040
<v Speaker 1>now she might be living her absolute best life. Thank

0:16:25.120 --> 0:16:26.680
<v Speaker 1>god I don't have to go to the met gala

0:16:26.760 --> 0:16:28.080
<v Speaker 1>with that guy.

0:16:28.320 --> 0:16:31.400
<v Speaker 3>She disagrees politically too. We don't know anything about it,

0:16:31.480 --> 0:16:35.280
<v Speaker 3>like she was kind of famously a conservative political voice

0:16:35.320 --> 0:16:39.360
<v Speaker 3>because he is the godparent of Rupert Murdock and Wendy

0:16:39.440 --> 0:16:45.480
<v Speaker 3>Dang's children. Also, he's very close with Avanka Trump. So

0:16:45.520 --> 0:16:48.560
<v Speaker 3>no one was surprised to see Hugh at the slightly

0:16:48.640 --> 0:16:50.040
<v Speaker 3>maga codd metgala.

0:16:50.120 --> 0:16:53.680
<v Speaker 1>Oh wow, he's unfair, And I know no one's crying

0:16:53.720 --> 0:16:57.000
<v Speaker 1>for the celebrities, but I think it's unfair to brand

0:16:57.120 --> 0:16:59.960
<v Speaker 1>everybody who was at that red carpet as maga.

0:16:59.800 --> 0:17:02.320
<v Speaker 3>Co Oh no, no, no, I did too, But I just

0:17:02.560 --> 0:17:06.159
<v Speaker 3>I'm saying that he's not exactly Alexandra Orcasio Cortez. No

0:17:06.480 --> 0:17:08.760
<v Speaker 3>one would be expecting him to make a big political

0:17:08.840 --> 0:17:11.439
<v Speaker 3>statement about the taxing the rich. No, he's very like

0:17:12.760 --> 0:17:15.760
<v Speaker 3>to promote.

0:17:16.280 --> 0:17:20.480
<v Speaker 1>In a moment, what the heck was all that Baldoni

0:17:20.640 --> 0:17:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Lively business about? If we've both basically ended with nobody

0:17:25.040 --> 0:17:29.840
<v Speaker 1>winning and no money changing hands. So moments before one

0:17:29.920 --> 0:17:33.879
<v Speaker 1>Blake Lively swept onto the met gala carpet looking a

0:17:33.880 --> 0:17:38.240
<v Speaker 1>bit like Cinderella, very trademark minus the bluebird. She didn't happen.

0:17:39.520 --> 0:17:45.560
<v Speaker 1>She always said exactly body, She's pretty good all that stuff.

0:17:46.080 --> 0:17:50.000
<v Speaker 1>But moments before that, a statement dropped into the inboxes

0:17:50.080 --> 0:17:53.399
<v Speaker 1>of major press outlets, including People, New York Times and

0:17:53.440 --> 0:17:57.080
<v Speaker 1>so on, and it read the end product the movie.

0:17:57.160 --> 0:17:59.239
<v Speaker 1>It ends with Us is a source of pride to

0:17:59.280 --> 0:18:01.400
<v Speaker 1>all of us who worked to bring it to life.

0:18:01.520 --> 0:18:05.440
<v Speaker 1>And with no context, Everyone's like, why are we reading this?

0:18:08.640 --> 0:18:12.200
<v Speaker 1>Raising awareness and making a meaningful impact in the lives

0:18:12.200 --> 0:18:16.080
<v Speaker 1>of domestic violence survivors and all survivors is a goal

0:18:16.160 --> 0:18:18.919
<v Speaker 1>that we stand behind. It becomes clear this is a

0:18:19.000 --> 0:18:23.360
<v Speaker 1>joint statement from Blake Lively's team and Justin Baldoni's team

0:18:23.600 --> 0:18:26.040
<v Speaker 1>about the court case we've all been obsessed about for years.

0:18:26.520 --> 0:18:32.879
<v Speaker 1>We acknowledge the process, presented challenges, did it.

0:18:32.840 --> 0:18:39.840
<v Speaker 3>Recollections and recognized concerns raised by mes Lively deserved to

0:18:39.880 --> 0:18:40.439
<v Speaker 3>be heard.

0:18:41.200 --> 0:18:45.760
<v Speaker 1>We remain firmly committed to workplaces free of improprieties and

0:18:45.960 --> 0:18:49.240
<v Speaker 1>unproductive environments. This is one of those statements that so

0:18:49.400 --> 0:18:51.480
<v Speaker 1>many lawyers were involved in drafting that it.

0:18:53.560 --> 0:18:56.600
<v Speaker 3>I hate an unproductive environment and I'm with that.

0:18:57.240 --> 0:19:01.720
<v Speaker 1>That's fair. It is our sincere hope that this statement

0:19:02.200 --> 0:19:06.520
<v Speaker 1>brings closure and allows all involved to move forward constructively

0:19:06.640 --> 0:19:12.320
<v Speaker 1>and in peace, including a respectful environment online. And in

0:19:12.400 --> 0:19:15.679
<v Speaker 1>the hope of moving forward constructively and in peace, Blake

0:19:15.800 --> 0:19:18.360
<v Speaker 1>goes to the met gal Yeah, yep. Now we'll get

0:19:18.400 --> 0:19:21.200
<v Speaker 1>to whether or not they got their respectful environment online,

0:19:21.800 --> 0:19:24.000
<v Speaker 1>But just a very quick catch up, because we would

0:19:24.040 --> 0:19:25.960
<v Speaker 1>be here for a year if we went into all

0:19:25.960 --> 0:19:27.920
<v Speaker 1>the ins and outs of what's been going on here.

0:19:28.280 --> 0:19:32.800
<v Speaker 1>But it all started when Blake Lively. Do I need

0:19:32.840 --> 0:19:35.840
<v Speaker 1>to explain who she is? Significant star actress, possessor of

0:19:35.880 --> 0:19:39.960
<v Speaker 1>wonderful hair, one half of a very powerful Hollywood power couple,

0:19:40.880 --> 0:19:43.399
<v Speaker 1>made a movie called It Ends with Us, based on

0:19:43.400 --> 0:19:45.120
<v Speaker 1>one of the best selling books in the past decade

0:19:45.160 --> 0:19:46.119
<v Speaker 1>by Colleen Hoover.

0:19:46.240 --> 0:19:48.119
<v Speaker 2>And you guys are weird about it because I said

0:19:48.119 --> 0:19:50.760
<v Speaker 2>this morning that it's objectively one of the worst movies

0:19:50.800 --> 0:19:53.640
<v Speaker 2>I've ever seen. And you guys, it's fine. You guys

0:19:53.720 --> 0:20:02.959
<v Speaker 2>were so mad well. I didn't stop you so mad well.

0:20:03.000 --> 0:20:05.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna get to that in a minute. The thing

0:20:05.880 --> 0:20:08.359
<v Speaker 1>is is that making a movie based on one of

0:20:08.359 --> 0:20:11.440
<v Speaker 1>the best selling books of the decade is smart business

0:20:11.840 --> 0:20:13.520
<v Speaker 1>and lots of people wanted to do it. But the

0:20:13.560 --> 0:20:16.359
<v Speaker 1>man who owned the rights was Justin Baldoni, who's a

0:20:16.440 --> 0:20:21.320
<v Speaker 1>lesser known dude. He's an actor, producer, self proclaimed feminist. Done.

0:20:21.320 --> 0:20:22.399
<v Speaker 1>Some Ted talks about it.

0:20:22.440 --> 0:20:24.439
<v Speaker 3>Everything I know about this man I've learned against my

0:20:24.480 --> 0:20:25.680
<v Speaker 3>will exactly done.

0:20:25.720 --> 0:20:29.080
<v Speaker 1>Some Ted talks about it podcast with Liz Plank something

0:20:29.119 --> 0:20:32.680
<v Speaker 1>something something. Anyway, the movie itself is about domestic balance.

0:20:32.720 --> 0:20:34.560
<v Speaker 1>That is not a mystery or a surprise at his

0:20:34.680 --> 0:20:37.640
<v Speaker 1>front and center in the plot. The movie got made,

0:20:37.680 --> 0:20:40.880
<v Speaker 1>and the movie was a huge hit, proving Claire Stephens wrong.

0:20:45.440 --> 0:20:46.520
<v Speaker 3>All I need to say.

0:20:47.119 --> 0:20:50.639
<v Speaker 1>Against the modest production budget of twenty five million, it

0:20:50.760 --> 0:20:55.960
<v Speaker 1>grossed around three hundred and fifty one million dollars. Huge movie, right,

0:20:56.520 --> 0:20:59.359
<v Speaker 1>But before the hit part happened, obviously, it was obvious

0:20:59.400 --> 0:21:01.919
<v Speaker 1>that things were for apart. Behind the scenes, everything had

0:21:01.960 --> 0:21:03.760
<v Speaker 1>gone very very wrong. We're not going to take you

0:21:03.800 --> 0:21:06.400
<v Speaker 1>through because again I know Klas Stevens has a PowerPoint

0:21:06.440 --> 0:21:08.520
<v Speaker 1>on this somewhere. You It went very deep at the time.

0:21:08.560 --> 0:21:10.160
<v Speaker 1>You were a great source of it.

0:21:09.640 --> 0:21:13.000
<v Speaker 3>It was great. A lot of this was going down.

0:21:13.040 --> 0:21:15.680
<v Speaker 2>I think maybe just as I submitted my books, and

0:21:15.760 --> 0:21:18.080
<v Speaker 2>my reward to myself was finish your book and you

0:21:18.080 --> 0:21:19.480
<v Speaker 2>can read all the legal poculars.

0:21:19.600 --> 0:21:22.639
<v Speaker 1>Yes, and there was this press tour that was like

0:21:22.720 --> 0:21:25.359
<v Speaker 1>separate red carpets and warring factions and all this stuff.

0:21:25.600 --> 0:21:29.119
<v Speaker 1>And then in December twenty twenty four, Lively sued Baldoni,

0:21:29.520 --> 0:21:33.879
<v Speaker 1>accusing him of harassment, sexual misconduct, and a smear campaign

0:21:33.960 --> 0:21:36.520
<v Speaker 1>on the set of their movie. She claimed that Baldoni

0:21:36.600 --> 0:21:41.560
<v Speaker 1>conspired with publicists to preemptively destroy her reputation, hence the

0:21:41.640 --> 0:21:44.959
<v Speaker 1>dodgy press tour after she privately accused him of sexually

0:21:45.000 --> 0:21:47.280
<v Speaker 1>harassing her on the movie set. There were a lot

0:21:47.480 --> 0:21:52.399
<v Speaker 1>of damning texts released, all hell broke loose. Then Baldoni countersued.

0:21:52.480 --> 0:21:56.000
<v Speaker 1>He basically alleged that Lively and her husband Ryan Reynolds

0:21:56.200 --> 0:21:59.480
<v Speaker 1>always wanted to take over this movie, the control of

0:21:59.520 --> 0:22:01.600
<v Speaker 1>the script, to the edit, all the things that they

0:22:01.640 --> 0:22:03.680
<v Speaker 1>had it in for him, and they used their very

0:22:03.720 --> 0:22:06.840
<v Speaker 1>famous friends to intimidate and harass him.

0:22:06.880 --> 0:22:10.000
<v Speaker 3>I'll never forget the email that when unanswered, that she

0:22:10.359 --> 0:22:11.280
<v Speaker 3>sent to Matt Damon.

0:22:11.359 --> 0:22:15.760
<v Speaker 1>Oh, I know. There were a lot of damning texts revealed.

0:22:15.440 --> 0:22:20.680
<v Speaker 2>Again, sorry, the one to Ben Affleck where she like, oh,

0:22:20.720 --> 0:22:24.320
<v Speaker 2>she just made an awkward joke about how she had

0:22:24.320 --> 0:22:26.840
<v Speaker 2>sent the email to Matt Damon and how great Matt

0:22:26.880 --> 0:22:28.800
<v Speaker 2>Damon was, and I was like, honey, that's like Ben

0:22:28.800 --> 0:22:31.879
<v Speaker 2>Affleck's biggest point of in security is comparing himself to

0:22:31.920 --> 0:22:36.239
<v Speaker 2>Matt Damon and you don't know the idiots and your

0:22:36.240 --> 0:22:37.280
<v Speaker 2>correspondence with Ben.

0:22:38.480 --> 0:22:43.080
<v Speaker 1>And so here we are suddenly, just weeks before this

0:22:43.200 --> 0:22:46.240
<v Speaker 1>mess was all going to go to court, all these

0:22:46.240 --> 0:22:47.320
<v Speaker 1>cases have been it.

0:22:47.320 --> 0:22:48.399
<v Speaker 3>Hadn't even gone to court.

0:22:48.480 --> 0:22:53.120
<v Speaker 1>No, some things had been dropped dropped. So first of all,

0:22:53.160 --> 0:22:55.879
<v Speaker 1>Baldoni's case against Lively got dropped, and some elements of

0:22:55.880 --> 0:22:57.840
<v Speaker 1>Lively's case against him got like so there was all

0:22:57.880 --> 0:22:59.440
<v Speaker 1>that was stuff, but it was it was meant to

0:22:59.480 --> 0:23:01.960
<v Speaker 1>go to court I think on May eighteen, so soon. Wow,

0:23:02.280 --> 0:23:06.200
<v Speaker 1>And days before it's been disappeared. Lawyers have made millions,

0:23:06.280 --> 0:23:09.880
<v Speaker 1>reputations have been trashed and nobody apparently no money exchanged

0:23:09.920 --> 0:23:12.639
<v Speaker 1>hands between the two parties, and no one, as you

0:23:13.080 --> 0:23:18.040
<v Speaker 1>as evidenced by that really confusing press release, nobody is

0:23:18.040 --> 0:23:21.440
<v Speaker 1>saying that they've won or not. Claire does the fact

0:23:21.480 --> 0:23:25.119
<v Speaker 1>that Blake Lively stepped onto the met Gala carpet the

0:23:25.160 --> 0:23:28.160
<v Speaker 1>minute that happened signaled that she sees this as victory

0:23:28.800 --> 0:23:30.960
<v Speaker 1>or that she'd liked to pretend the whole thing didn't happen,

0:23:31.000 --> 0:23:33.359
<v Speaker 1>And how the hell does she move forward?

0:23:33.400 --> 0:23:35.439
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Claire, what does that mean that she shot up

0:23:35.440 --> 0:23:36.200
<v Speaker 3>at the Metgala?

0:23:36.760 --> 0:23:37.000
<v Speaker 1>One?

0:23:37.280 --> 0:23:41.920
<v Speaker 2>I think it's genius. I always think that the best

0:23:42.920 --> 0:23:47.160
<v Speaker 2>publicity in response to this stuff is to be around

0:23:47.600 --> 0:23:52.200
<v Speaker 2>and change the narrative, like changing a different direction. Celebrities

0:23:52.240 --> 0:23:55.280
<v Speaker 2>are so clever that it is no coincidence that this

0:23:55.640 --> 0:23:57.919
<v Speaker 2>statement came out when it did and that then she

0:23:58.000 --> 0:24:01.280
<v Speaker 2>was on a red carpet, because you just you know

0:24:01.400 --> 0:24:03.320
<v Speaker 2>that there's so much going on in the world. People

0:24:03.320 --> 0:24:05.479
<v Speaker 2>are going to be all the celebrity reporters are going

0:24:05.520 --> 0:24:07.679
<v Speaker 2>to be distracted, just like the zones.

0:24:07.880 --> 0:24:09.600
<v Speaker 3>Yes, yes, And.

0:24:09.520 --> 0:24:12.080
<v Speaker 2>It's the same reason it always happens. When I was

0:24:12.200 --> 0:24:16.840
<v Speaker 2>editor in chief, the local Australian celebrities would always announce

0:24:16.840 --> 0:24:19.359
<v Speaker 2>their breakup at like five pm on a Friday, and

0:24:19.400 --> 0:24:20.359
<v Speaker 2>it's like, you know.

0:24:20.359 --> 0:24:22.320
<v Speaker 3>The journals have gone to drinks or boxing day.

0:24:22.480 --> 0:24:25.159
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, you know, we've gone to drinks, you know

0:24:25.480 --> 0:24:27.480
<v Speaker 2>that West Skeleton stuff on the weekends.

0:24:27.680 --> 0:24:29.479
<v Speaker 3>We're not going to go as hard on this story.

0:24:30.160 --> 0:24:32.200
<v Speaker 2>So I think it was smart that it was released

0:24:32.320 --> 0:24:34.120
<v Speaker 2>when it was, and it was smart that she turned

0:24:34.200 --> 0:24:37.200
<v Speaker 2>up at the met gala and that she reminded everyone

0:24:38.040 --> 0:24:40.560
<v Speaker 2>I look really good in address.

0:24:40.760 --> 0:24:43.359
<v Speaker 1>You to figure but disagree because what immediately happened the

0:24:43.440 --> 0:24:44.440
<v Speaker 1>minute she opened her mouth.

0:24:44.760 --> 0:24:48.960
<v Speaker 2>Well, this is what's interesting that depending on your algorithm,

0:24:48.960 --> 0:24:50.919
<v Speaker 2>and depending on what side of the Internet you're on,

0:24:52.000 --> 0:24:54.880
<v Speaker 2>there are two very different stories. So on certain apps,

0:24:55.080 --> 0:24:58.080
<v Speaker 2>the story I'm saying is this was a win for

0:24:58.200 --> 0:25:02.160
<v Speaker 2>Blake Lively that, for example, the line at the end

0:25:02.200 --> 0:25:07.360
<v Speaker 2>of that statement including a respectful environment online, that that

0:25:07.520 --> 0:25:11.800
<v Speaker 2>was very much acknowledging what had happened to her, which

0:25:12.000 --> 0:25:17.240
<v Speaker 2>was all the allegations about manufactur orchestrated campaign.

0:25:17.400 --> 0:25:19.440
<v Speaker 1>Because that is the thing that I will take away

0:25:19.440 --> 0:25:22.240
<v Speaker 1>from this mess the most, is that seeing the messages

0:25:22.280 --> 0:25:27.639
<v Speaker 1>between Baldoni's press people and him about ways that you

0:25:27.680 --> 0:25:32.959
<v Speaker 1>can use and manipulate social media to dent somebody's reputation

0:25:33.760 --> 0:25:37.240
<v Speaker 1>is not just like when you see suddenly start seeing

0:25:37.240 --> 0:25:39.760
<v Speaker 1>everywhere lots of tiktoks around of like, look at this

0:25:39.840 --> 0:25:42.320
<v Speaker 1>interview with this person, doesn't she come across a bit

0:25:42.400 --> 0:25:45.120
<v Speaker 1>like this but there can be a lot more behind it.

0:25:45.160 --> 0:25:47.200
<v Speaker 1>And this is also things that we pointed out about

0:25:47.200 --> 0:25:50.440
<v Speaker 1>amber Hood joining the amber Hood Johnny deppcayse that there

0:25:50.800 --> 0:25:54.280
<v Speaker 1>can be a really orchestrated dark arts going on there,

0:25:54.320 --> 0:25:57.320
<v Speaker 1>and certainly the examples that were pinging back and forward

0:25:57.359 --> 0:26:00.399
<v Speaker 1>between Justin Baldoni and his reps suggested that I knew that.

0:26:00.640 --> 0:26:03.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And so there's there's a lot of arguments that

0:26:03.560 --> 0:26:07.160
<v Speaker 2>that line in particular is about what she went through,

0:26:07.200 --> 0:26:10.960
<v Speaker 2>because she really has been torn apart on the internet. However,

0:26:11.600 --> 0:26:13.840
<v Speaker 2>I couldn't believe that she turns up at the met Gala.

0:26:14.440 --> 0:26:19.520
<v Speaker 2>She there's she clearly you could actually tell from her

0:26:19.680 --> 0:26:24.400
<v Speaker 2>speaking when she was interviewed that she was nervous, that

0:26:24.480 --> 0:26:27.119
<v Speaker 2>she was trying, like, I can't put my foot in it.

0:26:27.560 --> 0:26:28.800
<v Speaker 3>I can't like that.

0:26:29.000 --> 0:26:31.960
<v Speaker 2>There have been viral interviews of her for a couple

0:26:32.000 --> 0:26:35.439
<v Speaker 2>of years now all over the Internet of her just

0:26:35.480 --> 0:26:37.800
<v Speaker 2>saying slightly the wrong thing in an interview, and it

0:26:37.840 --> 0:26:41.240
<v Speaker 2>becomes that she's an awful person. Blake Lively did an

0:26:41.280 --> 0:26:44.040
<v Speaker 2>interview on the met Gala red carpet and it has

0:26:44.119 --> 0:26:47.960
<v Speaker 2>been analyzed to death, and people think she was rude

0:26:47.960 --> 0:26:51.760
<v Speaker 2>to the interviewer in this instance, well, you look gorgeous.

0:26:53.440 --> 0:26:57.520
<v Speaker 4>I am wearing Jackson weederhot gorgeous, thank you beautiful hair.

0:26:57.840 --> 0:27:01.720
<v Speaker 4>She yeah, you look studying. And this is archival versace,

0:27:02.520 --> 0:27:05.680
<v Speaker 4>but they met a fid it by adding a big

0:27:05.720 --> 0:27:09.760
<v Speaker 4>beautiful train. So it's a piece from two thousand and six.

0:27:09.960 --> 0:27:11.840
<v Speaker 4>And it was just such an honor to be able

0:27:11.880 --> 0:27:15.159
<v Speaker 4>to wear this gorgeous, gorgeous gown. It looks like a

0:27:15.200 --> 0:27:20.960
<v Speaker 4>sunrise and a sunset and watercolor and gorgeous range shworts, jewelry.

0:27:21.160 --> 0:27:25.760
<v Speaker 4>But this this, but these, this is a Judith leberbag.

0:27:25.880 --> 0:27:29.000
<v Speaker 4>And we were trying to find a piece of famous

0:27:29.160 --> 0:27:31.080
<v Speaker 4>iconic art to put on and make it look like

0:27:31.119 --> 0:27:33.359
<v Speaker 4>it was in a frame. And then I said, would

0:27:33.359 --> 0:27:36.000
<v Speaker 4>you actually, if you're gonna make it custom, would you

0:27:36.080 --> 0:27:40.120
<v Speaker 4>do my kid's art? So my kids each painted a painting,

0:27:40.200 --> 0:27:44.440
<v Speaker 4>a watercolor painting. So each of my four kids did this.

0:27:44.640 --> 0:27:45.959
<v Speaker 1>That is so spoo especial.

0:27:45.960 --> 0:27:46.760
<v Speaker 4>So I have them with me.

0:27:47.240 --> 0:27:50.560
<v Speaker 2>And that has been interpreted as her being a bit,

0:27:51.080 --> 0:27:54.240
<v Speaker 2>as her being dismissive, as her being self scentered. The

0:27:54.320 --> 0:28:00.639
<v Speaker 2>other thing that's been I think we want to know

0:28:00.680 --> 0:28:02.080
<v Speaker 2>what this is.

0:28:02.400 --> 0:28:07.600
<v Speaker 1>So here's my challenge to your strategy, be public, give

0:28:07.600 --> 0:28:10.800
<v Speaker 1>them things to talk about, because she can't get away

0:28:10.800 --> 0:28:12.920
<v Speaker 1>from this narrative now for some time, it's been years

0:28:12.920 --> 0:28:14.880
<v Speaker 1>of her lit like every time she opens her mouth.

0:28:14.880 --> 0:28:18.119
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of people invested in you're a terrible person,

0:28:18.240 --> 0:28:20.000
<v Speaker 1>as you say, so they're just going to find ways

0:28:20.000 --> 0:28:22.200
<v Speaker 1>to say that over and over again. In the way

0:28:22.240 --> 0:28:26.720
<v Speaker 1>that the Internet is now very invested in hating Blake

0:28:26.760 --> 0:28:28.399
<v Speaker 1>Lively a certain so, just in the way that the

0:28:28.440 --> 0:28:30.960
<v Speaker 1>internet's very invested in hating Megan Markele. It doesn't matter

0:28:31.000 --> 0:28:33.720
<v Speaker 1>what she does, what she says, where she goes. You

0:28:33.840 --> 0:28:34.760
<v Speaker 1>can't win that game.

0:28:34.920 --> 0:28:38.560
<v Speaker 2>One of the great arguments was it costs one hundred

0:28:38.680 --> 0:28:40.760
<v Speaker 2>k for a plate at the Met gala, and part

0:28:40.760 --> 0:28:44.640
<v Speaker 2>of her claim was the financial stress caused by Baldoni

0:28:44.720 --> 0:28:47.040
<v Speaker 2>smear campaign. And it's like she's not paying for that

0:28:47.200 --> 0:28:50.800
<v Speaker 2>one hundred k plate, neither is anyone people being like

0:28:50.840 --> 0:28:53.120
<v Speaker 2>I thought you were arguing you were locked out of Hollywood.

0:28:53.160 --> 0:28:55.240
<v Speaker 3>Doesn't look like you're locked out of Hollywood.

0:28:55.640 --> 0:28:59.080
<v Speaker 2>And she had a bag where her interpretation of the

0:29:00.200 --> 0:29:03.400
<v Speaker 2>art theme was that she got her four kids to

0:29:03.920 --> 0:29:06.240
<v Speaker 2>draw a picture on each side of the back no

0:29:06.640 --> 0:29:08.240
<v Speaker 2>self centered, made it about you.

0:29:08.400 --> 0:29:09.040
<v Speaker 3>You wanted to.

0:29:08.920 --> 0:29:12.240
<v Speaker 2>Claim authorship over this event, So there are people.

0:29:12.280 --> 0:29:14.080
<v Speaker 1>This is why I think her best strategy is to

0:29:14.080 --> 0:29:15.960
<v Speaker 1>go away for a few years.

0:29:16.440 --> 0:29:18.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, because I think the weird thing is I think

0:29:18.720 --> 0:29:23.320
<v Speaker 2>if Justin Baldoni had turned up, I think there's something,

0:29:23.920 --> 0:29:27.600
<v Speaker 2>there's an anonymity that we give men that we just

0:29:27.640 --> 0:29:30.600
<v Speaker 2>don't give women like I just don't think he is

0:29:30.640 --> 0:29:33.280
<v Speaker 2>going to be plagued in the same way. And I

0:29:33.280 --> 0:29:35.760
<v Speaker 2>think it's Marina Hyde who says he'll probably do some

0:29:35.840 --> 0:29:38.560
<v Speaker 2>low budget it.

0:29:38.560 --> 0:29:42.080
<v Speaker 1>Will definitely have dented his possibilities of becoming a big name.

0:29:42.280 --> 0:29:44.680
<v Speaker 1>I think that because, as Marina Hyde says in that

0:29:44.680 --> 0:29:46.360
<v Speaker 1>story in The Guardian, she wrote a column about this,

0:29:46.440 --> 0:29:49.040
<v Speaker 1>saying that the overarching lesson of this whole thing is

0:29:49.080 --> 0:29:51.280
<v Speaker 1>never ever go to court, never ever ever. And they

0:29:51.280 --> 0:29:54.600
<v Speaker 1>didn't actually end up in court, but still is that

0:29:54.680 --> 0:29:56.840
<v Speaker 1>for the rest of time. Their names are now linked,

0:29:57.000 --> 0:30:02.520
<v Speaker 1>every interview, every pro file, every project they do. This

0:30:02.600 --> 0:30:04.960
<v Speaker 1>will always be part of the story in a way

0:30:04.960 --> 0:30:07.400
<v Speaker 1>that it wouldn't if it hadn't entered the courts. But

0:30:07.480 --> 0:30:09.360
<v Speaker 1>when I say I think go away free, I don't

0:30:09.400 --> 0:30:12.000
<v Speaker 1>mean disappear like I don't mean silencing women. I mean

0:30:12.680 --> 0:30:16.320
<v Speaker 1>work on projects, work on producer projects, hustle behind the scenes,

0:30:16.360 --> 0:30:18.640
<v Speaker 1>do all your hollywoody stuff until you can come back

0:30:18.680 --> 0:30:20.760
<v Speaker 1>to address this with more nuanced Look at Lena Dunnan.

0:30:20.800 --> 0:30:23.719
<v Speaker 1>We've been talking about that a lot lately. Famously one

0:30:23.720 --> 0:30:25.360
<v Speaker 1>of the most hated women on the internet for a

0:30:25.400 --> 0:30:27.880
<v Speaker 1>period of time, couldn't put a foot right, couldn't do

0:30:27.960 --> 0:30:31.440
<v Speaker 1>anything right, opened her mouth, everybody jumped on her. We

0:30:31.560 --> 0:30:34.520
<v Speaker 1>know how the culture treats women who speak out about

0:30:34.520 --> 0:30:36.640
<v Speaker 1>all kinds of things. There are local examples of this too.

0:30:37.400 --> 0:30:40.040
<v Speaker 1>In a way. You've got to like let the air

0:30:40.120 --> 0:30:41.720
<v Speaker 1>out of it and then come back when there's some

0:30:41.840 --> 0:30:43.400
<v Speaker 1>nuance and distance.

0:30:43.160 --> 0:30:46.120
<v Speaker 3>You know what I mean That her while best friend

0:30:46.200 --> 0:30:48.560
<v Speaker 3>Taylor Swift would have told her that too, because Taylor,

0:30:48.600 --> 0:30:51.720
<v Speaker 3>of course also famously disappeared and was getting around in

0:30:51.800 --> 0:30:54.240
<v Speaker 3>large boxes for a while just to stay out of

0:30:54.240 --> 0:30:57.800
<v Speaker 3>the public eye. That comment of Marina Hides about never

0:30:57.840 --> 0:31:01.200
<v Speaker 3>go to court is interesting because a few years ago,

0:31:02.480 --> 0:31:06.239
<v Speaker 3>someone in a professional context did something to me that

0:31:06.320 --> 0:31:08.719
<v Speaker 3>made me want to take them to court, and so

0:31:08.760 --> 0:31:12.400
<v Speaker 3>I went to talk to a lawyer about it, who

0:31:12.400 --> 0:31:16.200
<v Speaker 3>have been recommended to me, and the lawyer heard me out.

0:31:16.240 --> 0:31:19.000
<v Speaker 3>I was very grateful for the advice she gave me.

0:31:19.080 --> 0:31:21.160
<v Speaker 3>She said, look, I think you have a strong case,

0:31:21.680 --> 0:31:25.160
<v Speaker 3>but if you did this, everyone in your field would

0:31:25.200 --> 0:31:27.680
<v Speaker 3>say that you were a nightmare, no matter what happened

0:31:28.440 --> 0:31:30.920
<v Speaker 3>in the court case, no matter how right you are,

0:31:31.000 --> 0:31:33.520
<v Speaker 3>and I do think you're right, it would affect you

0:31:33.600 --> 0:31:36.560
<v Speaker 3>professionally and it would follow you professionally for the rest

0:31:36.600 --> 0:31:39.400
<v Speaker 3>of your life. And I think getting that advice from

0:31:39.440 --> 0:31:42.400
<v Speaker 3>someone who had kind of a monetary gain to taking

0:31:42.440 --> 0:31:44.920
<v Speaker 3>the case on was something I really appreciated. And I

0:31:44.960 --> 0:31:48.400
<v Speaker 3>just wonder if Blake Lively's legal advice turned out to

0:31:48.440 --> 0:31:50.120
<v Speaker 3>be deeply misguided.

0:31:50.200 --> 0:31:52.520
<v Speaker 1>I know. The sad thing about this argument I've never

0:31:52.560 --> 0:31:55.840
<v Speaker 1>taken to court is, of course, that women putting up

0:31:55.840 --> 0:31:59.920
<v Speaker 1>with sexual harassment at work are just always this guy

0:32:00.320 --> 0:32:03.360
<v Speaker 1>from ever doing anywhere with it, because you're going to

0:32:03.480 --> 0:32:05.800
<v Speaker 1>get your character smeared. And it might be on the

0:32:05.840 --> 0:32:08.280
<v Speaker 1>scale of a Blake Lively, or it might be just

0:32:08.320 --> 0:32:11.800
<v Speaker 1>the local gossip at the football club, like whatever it is,

0:32:12.280 --> 0:32:15.400
<v Speaker 1>and that it's like we've seen this play out in

0:32:15.560 --> 0:32:21.600
<v Speaker 1>massive letters across the sky that watch out, women will

0:32:21.640 --> 0:32:24.440
<v Speaker 1>get you one way or another, and whether or not

0:32:24.560 --> 0:32:28.280
<v Speaker 1>Blake Lively is particularly likable, is always nice to everybody?

0:32:28.440 --> 0:32:30.080
<v Speaker 1>Blah blah blah, isn't the point?

0:32:30.640 --> 0:32:34.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it is quite scary for women knowing that if

0:32:34.320 --> 0:32:37.880
<v Speaker 2>you pursue, which is what an element of what Blake

0:32:37.920 --> 0:32:41.760
<v Speaker 2>Lively was pursuing, a sexual harassment claim, that all your

0:32:41.800 --> 0:32:46.400
<v Speaker 2>texts will be looked over and mocked and made fun of. Like,

0:32:46.440 --> 0:32:51.000
<v Speaker 2>that's a really scary cost to pay. After the break

0:32:51.320 --> 0:32:55.240
<v Speaker 2>James Valentine and why everyone's talking about the concept of

0:32:55.280 --> 0:32:59.040
<v Speaker 2>a living wake. On the twenty second of April of

0:32:59.080 --> 0:33:03.720
<v Speaker 2>this year, cast out musician and author James Valentine died

0:33:03.840 --> 0:33:07.240
<v Speaker 2>age sixty four, leaving behind his son, his daughter, and

0:33:07.360 --> 0:33:12.280
<v Speaker 2>his wife. The ABC veteran had terminal cancer, and he

0:33:12.400 --> 0:33:16.120
<v Speaker 2>was widely loved by his audience, who had been listening

0:33:16.120 --> 0:33:20.200
<v Speaker 2>to him for three decades. He had been transparent over

0:33:20.240 --> 0:33:23.400
<v Speaker 2>the last two and a half years about his health.

0:33:24.080 --> 0:33:29.440
<v Speaker 2>He was a very talented saxophone player and anyone who

0:33:29.480 --> 0:33:32.120
<v Speaker 2>grew up in the eighties in Australia probably knows him

0:33:32.760 --> 0:33:36.040
<v Speaker 2>as part of the band The Models and their iconic

0:33:36.120 --> 0:33:40.280
<v Speaker 2>songs Barbados and Out of Mind, Out of Sight, and

0:33:40.720 --> 0:33:46.360
<v Speaker 2>he was a Sydney radio presenter. Emilia and Holly, what

0:33:46.560 --> 0:33:50.560
<v Speaker 2>was your connection to James Valentine as a radio personality?

0:33:50.680 --> 0:33:54.360
<v Speaker 3>He was a really important figure in my childhood. He

0:33:54.520 --> 0:33:58.040
<v Speaker 3>hosted a thing called the Afternoon Show on ABC when

0:33:58.200 --> 0:34:01.600
<v Speaker 3>back when there were forty TV channels in this country.

0:34:01.720 --> 0:34:05.600
<v Speaker 3>I remember those days, and he would host and it

0:34:05.640 --> 0:34:10.000
<v Speaker 3>was cartoons, it was variety. And I never really listened

0:34:10.000 --> 0:34:12.719
<v Speaker 3>to him on the radio, but I have such you know,

0:34:13.480 --> 0:34:16.359
<v Speaker 3>in the way that those childhood figures loom large for you.

0:34:16.440 --> 0:34:21.160
<v Speaker 3>I've always held such fondness and affection for him. And

0:34:21.200 --> 0:34:21.960
<v Speaker 3>how about you, Hollie.

0:34:22.080 --> 0:34:27.440
<v Speaker 1>He's clearly just an incredibly skilled communicator. I mean, I

0:34:28.920 --> 0:34:30.960
<v Speaker 1>would be lying if I said I listened to that show.

0:34:31.120 --> 0:34:35.040
<v Speaker 1>But anyone who knows how radio works, how the ABC works,

0:34:35.040 --> 0:34:38.080
<v Speaker 1>so many people I know who know him. He was

0:34:38.160 --> 0:34:40.880
<v Speaker 1>just clearly exceptionally good at what he did and very loved.

0:34:41.239 --> 0:34:44.960
<v Speaker 2>It's a reminder I think that parasocial relationships have existed

0:34:45.360 --> 0:34:49.720
<v Speaker 2>long before the Internet. The fact that when the news

0:34:49.920 --> 0:34:54.200
<v Speaker 2>of his death came out there was a widespread kind

0:34:54.239 --> 0:34:57.560
<v Speaker 2>of public grieving and a lot of listeners who called

0:34:57.600 --> 0:35:00.879
<v Speaker 2>in the next day, and his wife and his kids

0:35:00.920 --> 0:35:02.719
<v Speaker 2>were kind of saying how much that meant to have

0:35:02.800 --> 0:35:05.920
<v Speaker 2>people remember their dad through sense of humor and his energy.

0:35:06.640 --> 0:35:08.840
<v Speaker 2>So two and a half years ago he was diagnosed

0:35:08.840 --> 0:35:13.200
<v Speaker 2>with esophagal cancer and he was given two different treatment options,

0:35:13.239 --> 0:35:15.479
<v Speaker 2>and he chose the one that was a bit less

0:35:15.480 --> 0:35:18.560
<v Speaker 2>invasive and would preserve the things he loved in life,

0:35:18.640 --> 0:35:23.399
<v Speaker 2>which were presenting radio, playing saxophone and enjoying food. Then

0:35:23.440 --> 0:35:27.400
<v Speaker 2>in January of this year, he's given a terminal diagnosis

0:35:27.719 --> 0:35:31.440
<v Speaker 2>and his response to that diagnosis and what he planned

0:35:31.440 --> 0:35:36.120
<v Speaker 2>to do next was documented in Monday's episode of Australian Story,

0:35:36.200 --> 0:35:40.680
<v Speaker 2>presented by Lee Sales, and it started a huge conversation

0:35:40.960 --> 0:35:44.480
<v Speaker 2>about the concept of a living wake, which he very

0:35:44.480 --> 0:35:48.120
<v Speaker 2>fittingly held on Valentine's Day of this year. Here's what

0:35:48.200 --> 0:35:50.359
<v Speaker 2>he said on the show stage.

0:35:50.080 --> 0:35:54.120
<v Speaker 5>Four, terminal, inoperable, uncurable. I don't want to hear any

0:35:54.200 --> 0:35:58.360
<v Speaker 5>of those words, let alone in the one sentence. So

0:35:58.560 --> 0:36:01.680
<v Speaker 5>a friend suggested Tommy, maybe you should do a living wake,

0:36:02.280 --> 0:36:06.000
<v Speaker 5>and oh, that sounds like fun. I will know the

0:36:06.000 --> 0:36:10.160
<v Speaker 5>time and the day and so it'll be the last weekend.

0:36:10.719 --> 0:36:14.400
<v Speaker 5>What do you do on that last weekend's dinner? Before?

0:36:14.440 --> 0:36:16.880
<v Speaker 5>What do you think is that the last meal, I

0:36:16.920 --> 0:36:19.600
<v Speaker 5>will probably know exactly when I'm going.

0:36:20.480 --> 0:36:24.520
<v Speaker 1>That's so moving. So seeing the footage of his reference

0:36:24.560 --> 0:36:26.879
<v Speaker 1>at the end there was due to the fact that

0:36:26.960 --> 0:36:29.680
<v Speaker 1>he ultimately chose the time he was going to die, right.

0:36:29.840 --> 0:36:35.439
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, he chose voluntary assisted dying and was very transparent

0:36:35.640 --> 0:36:39.759
<v Speaker 2>around how he made that decision and what that decision entailed.

0:36:40.080 --> 0:36:44.000
<v Speaker 2>For context, voluntary assisted dying is legal in all states

0:36:44.000 --> 0:36:49.120
<v Speaker 2>in Australia and the Act except the Northern Territory, and

0:36:49.200 --> 0:36:54.280
<v Speaker 2>obviously it's an incredibly complex and incredible, incredibly personal decision

0:36:54.400 --> 0:36:58.799
<v Speaker 2>that has sparked. It's sparking more and more conversation the

0:36:58.880 --> 0:37:02.480
<v Speaker 2>more we have and aging population and the more people

0:37:02.520 --> 0:37:07.719
<v Speaker 2>are getting certain diagnoses that may keep them alive for

0:37:07.760 --> 0:37:10.160
<v Speaker 2>a very long time, but the quality of that life

0:37:10.520 --> 0:37:14.640
<v Speaker 2>may be poor, and him kind of taking people through

0:37:14.680 --> 0:37:18.000
<v Speaker 2>that decision was a huge part of the Australian story.

0:37:18.360 --> 0:37:21.440
<v Speaker 2>But it meant that he got to plan this living

0:37:21.480 --> 0:37:25.640
<v Speaker 2>wake and there's footage of it, and he's got his

0:37:25.719 --> 0:37:29.360
<v Speaker 2>family and friends there and there are so many familiar

0:37:29.480 --> 0:37:33.240
<v Speaker 2>ABC faces and he's really good friends with Norman Swan,

0:37:34.000 --> 0:37:38.120
<v Speaker 2>who he had on radio to discuss his diagnosis, like

0:37:38.160 --> 0:37:40.319
<v Speaker 2>what all the different parts of the body were and

0:37:40.360 --> 0:37:44.800
<v Speaker 2>what they did. And there was something so moving about

0:37:45.520 --> 0:37:50.200
<v Speaker 2>seeing him on stage with a microphone at his own wake,

0:37:50.920 --> 0:37:53.759
<v Speaker 2>basically saying, please come up to me and tell me

0:37:54.239 --> 0:37:58.080
<v Speaker 2>stories and memories about us, because they are what's going

0:37:58.160 --> 0:38:01.640
<v Speaker 2>to carry me through the next few weeks. And I

0:38:01.640 --> 0:38:04.160
<v Speaker 2>guess I thought it must be such a relief for

0:38:04.280 --> 0:38:09.000
<v Speaker 2>his family that then when you do a funeral, he's

0:38:09.040 --> 0:38:12.279
<v Speaker 2>heard all the beautiful things that you're then going to

0:38:12.320 --> 0:38:16.880
<v Speaker 2>say about him. I think this is really something we

0:38:16.920 --> 0:38:19.360
<v Speaker 2>should we should all be looking at.

0:38:19.560 --> 0:38:23.320
<v Speaker 1>If it's possible, this episode of Australian Story is really

0:38:23.440 --> 0:38:26.400
<v Speaker 1>recommended viewing. I think, whether you know who James Valentine

0:38:26.480 --> 0:38:29.840
<v Speaker 1>is or not, in a world where we hate to

0:38:29.880 --> 0:38:33.480
<v Speaker 1>talk about death, and yet it touches everybody obviously, I

0:38:33.480 --> 0:38:35.600
<v Speaker 1>mean that's a ridiculous thing to say, but it does

0:38:35.680 --> 0:38:38.480
<v Speaker 1>touch everybody. I'd lost a friend to this same cancer

0:38:38.480 --> 0:38:40.960
<v Speaker 1>when he was only forty six. It's like all cancers.

0:38:41.000 --> 0:38:46.600
<v Speaker 1>It's a it's it's cruel and the idea that we're

0:38:46.640 --> 0:38:49.840
<v Speaker 1>also we don't like talking about illness, we don't like

0:38:49.840 --> 0:38:52.839
<v Speaker 1>talking about death, and seeing somebody such a skilled communicator

0:38:52.880 --> 0:38:57.319
<v Speaker 1>like James Valentine in this episode talking about why he

0:38:57.400 --> 0:38:59.960
<v Speaker 1>wanted to do the things he did, and they document

0:39:00.120 --> 0:39:03.799
<v Speaker 1>the year so very like him talking about how very

0:39:03.840 --> 0:39:06.279
<v Speaker 1>much clarified for him that he loved his work, so

0:39:06.320 --> 0:39:09.080
<v Speaker 1>he didn't want to stop working. He loved playing his saxophone,

0:39:09.080 --> 0:39:11.040
<v Speaker 1>so he wanted to try and avoid procedures that were

0:39:11.040 --> 0:39:13.080
<v Speaker 1>going to stop him from doing that. That he really

0:39:13.120 --> 0:39:15.480
<v Speaker 1>wanted to work, play and be with his family, and

0:39:15.520 --> 0:39:17.000
<v Speaker 1>those are the things he wanted to spend his last

0:39:17.080 --> 0:39:22.799
<v Speaker 1>year doing. It's just it's very powerful, it's very clarifying.

0:39:22.920 --> 0:39:25.799
<v Speaker 1>And then to see him at his living way and

0:39:25.880 --> 0:39:29.120
<v Speaker 1>he says, you know, it wakes People always say, oh,

0:39:29.160 --> 0:39:32.400
<v Speaker 1>he would have loved me there, and he says, so

0:39:32.520 --> 0:39:35.959
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to be there, And I just think it's

0:39:36.120 --> 0:39:39.120
<v Speaker 1>very refreshing. I think, you know, I, as I said,

0:39:39.160 --> 0:39:41.880
<v Speaker 1>I didn't have a direct listenership with Joe's Valentine, but

0:39:41.960 --> 0:39:44.160
<v Speaker 1>people who do, and people I know who've worked with

0:39:44.200 --> 0:39:46.560
<v Speaker 1>him said he brought joy all the time. And it

0:39:46.680 --> 0:39:52.120
<v Speaker 1>feels like a gift to give be so honest and

0:39:52.200 --> 0:39:55.839
<v Speaker 1>so open and so clear eyed in talking about this

0:39:55.840 --> 0:39:59.640
<v Speaker 1>thing that nobody wants to talk about. Is like the

0:39:59.719 --> 0:40:03.000
<v Speaker 1>last incredible gift that a great communicator could give, and

0:40:03.040 --> 0:40:05.759
<v Speaker 1>his family is so amazing in it. I really recommend

0:40:06.280 --> 0:40:07.160
<v Speaker 1>watching the show.

0:40:07.680 --> 0:40:10.960
<v Speaker 2>There's a great quote in one of the ABC articles

0:40:11.000 --> 0:40:15.120
<v Speaker 2>about his kind of decision making towards towards the end,

0:40:15.760 --> 0:40:20.680
<v Speaker 2>where I think, as a psychologist says, dying people are

0:40:20.760 --> 0:40:23.920
<v Speaker 2>not the actual act of dying is not the thing

0:40:23.920 --> 0:40:28.160
<v Speaker 2>they're most scared of. They're scared of the invisibility and

0:40:28.200 --> 0:40:32.600
<v Speaker 2>the absence of conversation around it. They're scared of people

0:40:33.000 --> 0:40:35.800
<v Speaker 2>turning away and not wanting to be around them because

0:40:35.840 --> 0:40:39.480
<v Speaker 2>of how confronting it is. And this was just such

0:40:39.480 --> 0:40:42.920
<v Speaker 2>a reminder to look it straight in the eye and

0:40:43.120 --> 0:40:47.359
<v Speaker 2>have the existential conversations with the people around you. The

0:40:47.400 --> 0:40:51.560
<v Speaker 2>way that he spoke to his kids, and his kids

0:40:51.560 --> 0:40:53.080
<v Speaker 2>were able to say, what do you think is going

0:40:53.120 --> 0:40:54.520
<v Speaker 2>to happen afterwards?

0:40:54.719 --> 0:40:57.160
<v Speaker 3>And I bet that that's so much harder to do

0:40:57.400 --> 0:41:00.239
<v Speaker 3>than even it looks. It doesn't look easy, but I

0:41:00.239 --> 0:41:04.840
<v Speaker 3>bet it's even harder to actually enact these principles that

0:41:04.880 --> 0:41:06.560
<v Speaker 3>we can all agree are worthwhile.

0:41:07.360 --> 0:41:10.080
<v Speaker 1>I love that his kids say that this was perfect

0:41:10.120 --> 0:41:12.839
<v Speaker 1>for him in particular, this living weight, because he loved

0:41:12.880 --> 0:41:15.040
<v Speaker 1>being center of attention. He loved a party, He loved

0:41:15.040 --> 0:41:16.759
<v Speaker 1>being told I'm brad he was. I love the way

0:41:16.800 --> 0:41:19.960
<v Speaker 1>they you know that families are really kind of I mean,

0:41:20.000 --> 0:41:22.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure no families are perfect, but they're really healthy

0:41:22.480 --> 0:41:24.400
<v Speaker 1>and loving when they can just call out that stuff

0:41:24.440 --> 0:41:27.160
<v Speaker 1>about you and be like, he would love this because

0:41:27.160 --> 0:41:29.359
<v Speaker 1>he just loves everybody tell him how great he is.

0:41:31.160 --> 0:41:31.600
<v Speaker 3>So good.

0:41:31.760 --> 0:41:34.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And I loved that it wasn't a sanitized version

0:41:35.000 --> 0:41:39.239
<v Speaker 2>because I think something I always bristle at is when

0:41:39.280 --> 0:41:44.600
<v Speaker 2>you hear of somebody getting a terminal diagnosis or of

0:41:45.360 --> 0:41:49.320
<v Speaker 2>you know, knowing that they're going to die. I bristle

0:41:49.320 --> 0:41:53.319
<v Speaker 2>at the narrative of I guess almost toxic positivity that

0:41:53.360 --> 0:41:57.440
<v Speaker 2>they're just like, well, I'm completely grateful and joyful. And

0:41:57.480 --> 0:42:01.000
<v Speaker 2>then I feel for the people who don't have that response,

0:42:01.200 --> 0:42:04.800
<v Speaker 2>which is completely bloody normal. But I loved there was

0:42:04.840 --> 0:42:06.600
<v Speaker 2>a lot of light and shade in this. They talked

0:42:06.600 --> 0:42:11.640
<v Speaker 2>about they went on a holiday, a family holiday to Bali,

0:42:12.080 --> 0:42:16.239
<v Speaker 2>just before he was meant to get the surgery for

0:42:16.320 --> 0:42:21.600
<v Speaker 2>his esophagus, and that the whole family's like, oh so

0:42:21.719 --> 0:42:26.600
<v Speaker 2>bloody terrible holiday. Everyone was sick, everyone had covid Dad.

0:42:26.360 --> 0:42:29.360
<v Speaker 3>Had BALI belly like. It's sort of I like that.

0:42:29.440 --> 0:42:33.520
<v Speaker 2>In documenting this time, they've been able to show the

0:42:33.600 --> 0:42:38.000
<v Speaker 2>highs and lows of what happened. But the nort Yeah,

0:42:38.400 --> 0:42:42.200
<v Speaker 2>how normal it is. But the fact that he was

0:42:42.280 --> 0:42:47.040
<v Speaker 2>able to do it his way, and that those conversations

0:42:47.239 --> 0:42:52.399
<v Speaker 2>around what you want, what you don't want, they give

0:42:52.520 --> 0:42:56.520
<v Speaker 2>so much empowerment in those in those final months and

0:42:56.640 --> 0:42:57.640
<v Speaker 2>final days.

0:42:58.200 --> 0:43:02.240
<v Speaker 1>Something completely different. There was celebrity baby news this week

0:43:02.520 --> 0:43:07.840
<v Speaker 1>that I must mark because it was interesting. Cameron Diaz

0:43:08.080 --> 0:43:11.879
<v Speaker 1>and Benji Madden just welcomed their third child. And it's

0:43:11.920 --> 0:43:16.400
<v Speaker 1>interesting because Cameron is fifty three. Now. When I say that,

0:43:16.440 --> 0:43:18.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't mean it's interesting in that way of like, oh,

0:43:18.640 --> 0:43:20.560
<v Speaker 1>miracle baby, how did she do that? Why did you

0:43:20.600 --> 0:43:23.799
<v Speaker 1>do that? Cameron Diaz. They announced that their little boy

0:43:23.800 --> 0:43:27.200
<v Speaker 1>had come. They announced what his name was. His name

0:43:27.239 --> 0:43:30.520
<v Speaker 1>is Nortous and he joins Raddix and Cardinal, which are

0:43:30.560 --> 0:43:33.440
<v Speaker 1>all just the most rock star names of all time.

0:43:34.560 --> 0:43:37.960
<v Speaker 1>They announced it. They didn't give any more details than that.

0:43:38.640 --> 0:43:41.359
<v Speaker 1>It is safe to assume just because Cam's been on

0:43:41.400 --> 0:43:44.120
<v Speaker 1>a press tour lately, she's been quite visible on a

0:43:44.760 --> 0:43:47.880
<v Speaker 1>tour for a movie called Outcome, So she's been very visible,

0:43:48.120 --> 0:43:50.360
<v Speaker 1>and it's safe to assume possibly that she wasn't heavily

0:43:50.360 --> 0:43:53.720
<v Speaker 1>pregnant during that time, so likely that a surrogate was involved,

0:43:53.719 --> 0:43:56.680
<v Speaker 1>but none of our business. But the thing that I

0:43:56.760 --> 0:43:59.960
<v Speaker 1>found really interesting and refreshing that I wanted to unpack

0:44:00.040 --> 0:44:03.480
<v Speaker 1>a little bit here is I wrote an essay a

0:44:03.480 --> 0:44:06.400
<v Speaker 1>while ago when Sienna Miller was on the Red Carpet

0:44:06.400 --> 0:44:08.799
<v Speaker 1>with her beautiful baby bump at I think forty three,

0:44:09.680 --> 0:44:12.839
<v Speaker 1>and saying how we're entering a bit of an era

0:44:12.960 --> 0:44:18.680
<v Speaker 1>of agelessness because perhaps of fertility technology, because of the

0:44:18.719 --> 0:44:21.200
<v Speaker 1>different options that are open to us now, because of

0:44:21.320 --> 0:44:27.360
<v Speaker 1>Hollywood and the wellness world's obsession with longevity, that we're

0:44:27.440 --> 0:44:30.920
<v Speaker 1>in a different era now when it comes to age

0:44:31.000 --> 0:44:34.239
<v Speaker 1>and women and kids. And I think nothing illustrates that

0:44:34.560 --> 0:44:37.799
<v Speaker 1>more clearly than the fact that there haven't been a

0:44:37.920 --> 0:44:41.880
<v Speaker 1>whole waterfall of stories about like, oh my god, a

0:44:42.040 --> 0:44:44.600
<v Speaker 1>mom at fifty three and how could she and why

0:44:44.640 --> 0:44:47.080
<v Speaker 1>would she? And da da da da. Is that now

0:44:47.120 --> 0:44:50.279
<v Speaker 1>we're much more kind of like in the way that

0:44:50.320 --> 0:44:54.120
<v Speaker 1>we might be about a man becoming a father at

0:44:54.160 --> 0:45:01.080
<v Speaker 1>fifty three, because if you remove the biological complication from

0:45:01.080 --> 0:45:04.040
<v Speaker 1>the advance for chility technology and all those things. It

0:45:04.120 --> 0:45:07.240
<v Speaker 1>isn't really any different than the guy who's been doing

0:45:07.239 --> 0:45:09.719
<v Speaker 1>that forever. Yeah, am I right? Yeah?

0:45:09.760 --> 0:45:12.280
<v Speaker 2>No, I think so too. The interesting thing is, as well,

0:45:12.360 --> 0:45:17.879
<v Speaker 2>when I've looked at this story, how old Benji Madam? Well,

0:45:17.920 --> 0:45:20.279
<v Speaker 2>nobody ever, as I don't know, I don't know, why

0:45:20.320 --> 0:45:20.759
<v Speaker 2>didn't I.

0:45:20.719 --> 0:45:23.479
<v Speaker 1>Google similar age? I think, well, let's find it happen.

0:45:23.600 --> 0:45:28.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, because you're seven, so being a little bit younger

0:45:28.120 --> 0:45:32.800
<v Speaker 2>Benji's forty seven, bloody spring chicken. But I it's interesting

0:45:32.840 --> 0:45:36.600
<v Speaker 2>because whenever I see pregnancy baby news, it's obviously the

0:45:36.640 --> 0:45:37.120
<v Speaker 2>life stage.

0:45:37.160 --> 0:45:38.719
<v Speaker 3>I'man, I always google.

0:45:38.680 --> 0:45:39.400
<v Speaker 1>How old is how?

0:45:39.600 --> 0:45:40.360
<v Speaker 3>How old is that?

0:45:40.440 --> 0:45:41.319
<v Speaker 1>Money is she?

0:45:42.360 --> 0:45:45.279
<v Speaker 2>And you're right that we don't when we wouldn't blink

0:45:45.280 --> 0:45:48.359
<v Speaker 2>an eye at a man having a child at fifty three.

0:45:48.480 --> 0:45:51.279
<v Speaker 2>And obviously, if you want to think about any of

0:45:51.320 --> 0:45:54.320
<v Speaker 2>the things that make rearing children.

0:45:55.000 --> 0:45:57.080
<v Speaker 3>Difficult, the older you get.

0:45:58.239 --> 0:46:03.560
<v Speaker 2>I mean, Amaran Diaz looks like a bloody pillar of health.

0:46:03.640 --> 0:46:06.040
<v Speaker 2>She's gonna live forever, She's gonna live till she's undred.

0:46:06.200 --> 0:46:08.920
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think what's interesting is that you said no

0:46:09.000 --> 0:46:11.799
<v Speaker 3>one will blink, and I about a man. I wonder if, now,

0:46:11.880 --> 0:46:15.560
<v Speaker 3>because women are also having babies older, all of a sudden,

0:46:16.200 --> 0:46:20.040
<v Speaker 3>we're starting to blink her eyes at men having babies older.

0:46:20.360 --> 0:46:22.760
<v Speaker 3>Men were allowed to do it for all of human history,

0:46:23.120 --> 0:46:25.520
<v Speaker 3>but now that women are starting to do it, we're

0:46:25.560 --> 0:46:30.000
<v Speaker 3>starting to revisit the whole idea of older parents because.

0:46:29.719 --> 0:46:32.879
<v Speaker 2>We are interested, and there is actually more and more

0:46:33.239 --> 0:46:41.720
<v Speaker 2>scientific research going into the health impacts of older because

0:46:41.800 --> 0:46:45.160
<v Speaker 2>you know how, I'm called geriatric. Just for the record,

0:46:45.320 --> 0:46:49.279
<v Speaker 2>I'm a geriatric mother. What age, I'm thirty five years old. No,

0:46:49.400 --> 0:46:51.040
<v Speaker 2>they don't. They call it advanced material.

0:46:51.239 --> 0:46:54.960
<v Speaker 3>They definitely call it just it's kind of coolrophistic.

0:46:55.600 --> 0:46:58.080
<v Speaker 1>They definitely did call it geriatric though, when I had

0:46:58.120 --> 0:47:02.000
<v Speaker 1>my second child at forty, I that's interesting.

0:47:02.040 --> 0:47:04.680
<v Speaker 2>But if they call Brent geriatric, no, but they should

0:47:04.719 --> 0:47:09.160
<v Speaker 2>have done it because he's elderly, I think.

0:47:09.680 --> 0:47:13.240
<v Speaker 1>I think that's interesting. But then that also assumes.

0:47:13.000 --> 0:47:15.840
<v Speaker 3>Like the judgments creeping in for both sexes now, is

0:47:15.840 --> 0:47:16.399
<v Speaker 3>what I'm saying.

0:47:16.440 --> 0:47:20.120
<v Speaker 1>Yes, and that assumes the idea about like we're becoming

0:47:20.160 --> 0:47:23.640
<v Speaker 1>aware of the risks of older parents assumes assumes a

0:47:23.640 --> 0:47:27.120
<v Speaker 1>lot about what might be going on here biologically. Yes, exactly,

0:47:27.360 --> 0:47:32.839
<v Speaker 1>whereas if Cameron Diaz and Benji Madden and whoever else

0:47:32.880 --> 0:47:36.040
<v Speaker 1>may be in their cohort are having are assessing all

0:47:36.040 --> 0:47:38.239
<v Speaker 1>the risks, I'm sure they are. We know how health

0:47:38.280 --> 0:47:42.800
<v Speaker 1>obsessed Hollywood is and making those choices, and there I think.

0:47:43.160 --> 0:47:45.439
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that's interesting though, Amelia, where you say

0:47:45.480 --> 0:47:48.560
<v Speaker 1>that that maybe the judgment, instead of fading away, just

0:47:48.560 --> 0:47:50.280
<v Speaker 1>attaches itself to both genders.

0:47:50.360 --> 0:47:53.160
<v Speaker 3>Well, because I don't think it is just about biology.

0:47:53.480 --> 0:47:55.640
<v Speaker 3>I think it would be we need to put on

0:47:55.680 --> 0:47:58.160
<v Speaker 3>the table to not be disingenuous. That a lot of

0:47:58.160 --> 0:48:01.520
<v Speaker 3>people listening to this may have a reaction of if

0:48:01.560 --> 0:48:05.560
<v Speaker 3>you have a baby at a more advanced age, shall

0:48:05.600 --> 0:48:08.600
<v Speaker 3>we say, in your fifties, you automatically do a bit

0:48:08.600 --> 0:48:13.120
<v Speaker 3>of maths, and you think, well, when that child in school,

0:48:13.560 --> 0:48:16.040
<v Speaker 3>Cameron Diaz will be sixty three. I don't know how

0:48:16.080 --> 0:48:18.280
<v Speaker 3>old Benji Madden will because I'm not that good at maths,

0:48:18.320 --> 0:48:21.120
<v Speaker 3>but he'll be also kind of old. And so I

0:48:21.160 --> 0:48:24.399
<v Speaker 3>think that's one of the concerns that people are now

0:48:24.520 --> 0:48:28.080
<v Speaker 3>voicing a little bit more when no one ever used

0:48:28.120 --> 0:48:29.560
<v Speaker 3>to say, well, Mick Jagger is going to be so

0:48:29.640 --> 0:48:32.520
<v Speaker 3>old when his kids graduate but now we are starting

0:48:32.520 --> 0:48:35.440
<v Speaker 3>to say that or feeling perhaps feeling more comfortable to

0:48:35.480 --> 0:48:35.920
<v Speaker 3>say that.

0:48:36.600 --> 0:48:38.640
<v Speaker 1>I think that's really interesting. But then I think in

0:48:38.719 --> 0:48:43.640
<v Speaker 1>this privileged bubble that we're talking about, longevity is an obsession.

0:48:44.120 --> 0:48:47.319
<v Speaker 1>So I think that that is also changing. This right

0:48:47.440 --> 0:48:50.759
<v Speaker 1>is that people are thinking rightly, wrongly whatever that with

0:48:50.880 --> 0:48:53.120
<v Speaker 1>all the right advances and all the right supplements and

0:48:53.160 --> 0:48:57.080
<v Speaker 1>all the right that they're imagining themselves at seventy three,

0:48:57.360 --> 0:49:00.279
<v Speaker 1>at this kid's twenty first, like leaping around, I'm doing

0:49:00.360 --> 0:49:02.080
<v Speaker 1>yoga and pilate, particularly if they.

0:49:04.200 --> 0:49:07.840
<v Speaker 2>And Brian Johnson says he's got what is it the

0:49:07.840 --> 0:49:11.640
<v Speaker 2>sperm of a twenty old? Think about that, man, Yeah,

0:49:11.880 --> 0:49:14.560
<v Speaker 2>So I'm sure Cameron and Benji are having the same conversation.

0:49:14.640 --> 0:49:18.120
<v Speaker 3>So Cameron has remember she literally wrote a book about

0:49:18.160 --> 0:49:20.360
<v Speaker 3>sort of how to be healthy as you get older,

0:49:20.520 --> 0:49:23.200
<v Speaker 3>so she's this is clearly on her radar that she's

0:49:23.200 --> 0:49:25.520
<v Speaker 3>sort of anticipating she will be living a long time.

0:49:26.239 --> 0:49:28.560
<v Speaker 1>That's always got time for on this Wednesday.

0:49:28.640 --> 0:49:33.520
<v Speaker 3>At births, deaths, any marriages, No.

0:49:33.560 --> 0:49:35.560
<v Speaker 1>There weren't any couples at the met gala, were they?

0:49:35.600 --> 0:49:36.320
<v Speaker 1>They all went.

0:49:36.200 --> 0:49:42.640
<v Speaker 2>Solo boycotting, boycotting marriage on the metal, or.

0:49:42.600 --> 0:49:45.160
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it was like, unless that engagement wing comes from Amazon,

0:49:45.200 --> 0:49:50.680
<v Speaker 1>we don't sink, perhaps in her body, her head and

0:49:50.760 --> 0:49:54.480
<v Speaker 1>she did anyway. Thank you for being with us. Thank

0:49:54.520 --> 0:49:56.560
<v Speaker 1>you for to our amazing team for helping us put

0:49:56.560 --> 0:49:58.080
<v Speaker 1>the show together. We're going to be back in your

0:49:58.120 --> 0:50:01.880
<v Speaker 1>ears on Friday, of course, and for subscribers with some

0:50:01.960 --> 0:50:05.280
<v Speaker 1>scorelous gossip with Mia tomorrow. That's all.

0:50:05.360 --> 0:50:10.000
<v Speaker 2>Goodbye, Bye, Mummyer acknowledges the traditional owners of the land

0:50:10.080 --> 0:50:11.840
<v Speaker 2>on which we've recorded this podcast.