WEBVTT - 'Smellmaxxing' & The New Place We Apparently Stink

0:00:08.234 --> 0:00:10.914
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to a MoMA Mia podcast.

0:00:15.994 --> 0:00:18.674
<v Speaker 2>Hello and welcome to Mama Mia out Loud. It's what

0:00:18.674 --> 0:00:21.354
<v Speaker 2>women are talking about on Wednesday, the fifth of November.

0:00:21.434 --> 0:00:24.233
<v Speaker 1>I am hollywayn Might, I'm Amelia Lester, and.

0:00:24.194 --> 0:00:25.354
<v Speaker 3>I'm Jesse Stevens.

0:00:25.514 --> 0:00:28.394
<v Speaker 2>And what's made our agenda for today? Well, there's an

0:00:28.434 --> 0:00:32.074
<v Speaker 2>American man that I had never heard of, but who

0:00:32.153 --> 0:00:36.153
<v Speaker 2>is in the last couple of days, absolutely everywhere I look,

0:00:36.434 --> 0:00:38.994
<v Speaker 2>So who is he? And what does he want from us?

0:00:39.233 --> 0:00:40.553
<v Speaker 2>Amelia knows?

0:00:41.513 --> 0:00:44.313
<v Speaker 1>And what happened to all the rom coms? Is that

0:00:44.354 --> 0:00:46.153
<v Speaker 1>why we're bad at dating now? Because there are no

0:00:46.273 --> 0:00:49.553
<v Speaker 1>rom comms anymore. Bruce Witherspoon has a theory.

0:00:49.513 --> 0:00:52.553
<v Speaker 3>And the deodorant ad that made me feel very weird?

0:00:52.833 --> 0:00:55.434
<v Speaker 3>Why is everyone so obsessed with smell? Right?

0:00:56.314 --> 0:00:59.273
<v Speaker 1>But first, in case you missed it, four suspects have

0:00:59.354 --> 0:01:03.673
<v Speaker 1>been arrested in the Louver heist which transfixed the world recently.

0:01:03.754 --> 0:01:04.553
<v Speaker 1>Did you see the photo?

0:01:04.634 --> 0:01:06.274
<v Speaker 3>Did I see marg Shotz? I was gonna ask I

0:01:06.274 --> 0:01:07.074
<v Speaker 3>saw them circular.

0:01:07.154 --> 0:01:08.034
<v Speaker 2>They were very handsome.

0:01:08.154 --> 0:01:11.754
<v Speaker 1>They are not the felons in question. They are previous

0:01:11.794 --> 0:01:14.714
<v Speaker 1>hot felons. Sorry to burst the bubble. It was nice

0:01:14.714 --> 0:01:17.394
<v Speaker 1>to imagine, no word on the jewels and where they are.

0:01:17.514 --> 0:01:20.994
<v Speaker 1>But police are definitely playing bad cop with these suspects.

0:01:21.154 --> 0:01:24.434
<v Speaker 1>They are making clear that they were not exactly criminal masterminds,

0:01:24.834 --> 0:01:28.074
<v Speaker 1>and they are dismissing them as petty thieves, which I

0:01:28.154 --> 0:01:30.794
<v Speaker 1>know is a phrase that sounds so much more amazing

0:01:30.914 --> 0:01:35.594
<v Speaker 1>when said in French. Unfortunately, for the Louver, the people

0:01:35.634 --> 0:01:38.234
<v Speaker 1>in charge of the security systems, they were also not

0:01:38.634 --> 0:01:42.274
<v Speaker 1>exactly operating at an elite level. A report in the

0:01:42.274 --> 0:01:46.274
<v Speaker 1>French newspaper Liberacion do you like that accent? Thank you,

0:01:46.754 --> 0:01:50.914
<v Speaker 1>reports that the password on the Louver's video surveillance system,

0:01:51.074 --> 0:01:55.034
<v Speaker 1>the video surveillance system which went down briefly during the heist,

0:01:55.674 --> 0:02:00.114
<v Speaker 1>that password was Louver. And all I can say is,

0:02:00.154 --> 0:02:01.914
<v Speaker 1>at least it wasn't password you know.

0:02:03.074 --> 0:02:06.274
<v Speaker 3>Me My first guess I think that you just know

0:02:06.314 --> 0:02:09.554
<v Speaker 3>that whoever was made the password got to the you know,

0:02:09.714 --> 0:02:12.234
<v Speaker 3>come on, what's password? They looked up, they saw the

0:02:12.274 --> 0:02:14.633
<v Speaker 3>Louver and they went, that'll do it. Now. They did

0:02:14.714 --> 0:02:17.114
<v Speaker 3>use the capital, which I think was probably part of

0:02:17.114 --> 0:02:20.834
<v Speaker 3>the rules, but I would bet any money that it

0:02:20.834 --> 0:02:26.714
<v Speaker 3>has now been changed to love one exam just as

0:02:26.754 --> 0:02:29.874
<v Speaker 3>a little special character need to make it a bit harder.

0:02:30.154 --> 0:02:32.994
<v Speaker 2>They need to employ some teenage boys. My son's really

0:02:32.994 --> 0:02:35.874
<v Speaker 2>good at changing passwords to things I can't guess, like,

0:02:36.034 --> 0:02:37.874
<v Speaker 2>really good at it. He would never make such a

0:02:37.954 --> 0:02:38.674
<v Speaker 2>rookie mistake.

0:02:38.834 --> 0:02:41.154
<v Speaker 3>Politely, though, Billy, I don't want access to any of

0:02:41.154 --> 0:02:44.994
<v Speaker 3>your You have no money, you have nothing interesting though.

0:02:45.034 --> 0:02:45.994
<v Speaker 2>He just wants to hide.

0:02:46.474 --> 0:02:49.194
<v Speaker 1>Do you feel like the computers are getting more bossy

0:02:49.234 --> 0:02:51.794
<v Speaker 1>with us about passwords? Like lately, I've been having this

0:02:51.914 --> 0:02:55.554
<v Speaker 1>situation where it will just very rudely reject the password

0:02:55.634 --> 0:02:57.914
<v Speaker 1>that I have been using for everything for the last

0:02:57.954 --> 0:02:59.954
<v Speaker 1>six years of my life, and it says, oh, it

0:02:59.994 --> 0:03:02.154
<v Speaker 1>has to have special characters, it has to have more

0:03:02.394 --> 0:03:04.234
<v Speaker 1>letters in it. I mean, they're so bossy.

0:03:04.314 --> 0:03:06.954
<v Speaker 3>Does anyone use a special character that isn't an exclamation?

0:03:07.154 --> 0:03:07.793
<v Speaker 4>Oh?

0:03:07.994 --> 0:03:08.874
<v Speaker 1>Such a good question.

0:03:08.914 --> 0:03:11.554
<v Speaker 2>I tell you that you might happen to like the

0:03:11.554 --> 0:03:13.194
<v Speaker 2>place I'm keeping all my Crown jewels.

0:03:13.394 --> 0:03:15.994
<v Speaker 3>Recently, I was tapped on the shoulder and told Jesse

0:03:16.114 --> 0:03:17.634
<v Speaker 3>there's been a data breach and you are the only

0:03:17.674 --> 0:03:20.914
<v Speaker 3>one in the whole company, And they said, you've got

0:03:20.954 --> 0:03:22.714
<v Speaker 3>to change your password, and probably if you know, if

0:03:22.794 --> 0:03:25.234
<v Speaker 3>you've used that password for another account, I would change it.

0:03:26.074 --> 0:03:29.234
<v Speaker 3>Four hours later, I was like, going through every account,

0:03:29.874 --> 0:03:33.513
<v Speaker 3>how do I change it slightly so that I am

0:03:33.594 --> 0:03:35.234
<v Speaker 3>not in a situation like this?

0:03:35.994 --> 0:03:40.354
<v Speaker 2>Love, There's a man who is suddenly all over my

0:03:40.514 --> 0:03:43.514
<v Speaker 2>Instagram and not only mine. To give you a little

0:03:43.554 --> 0:03:46.074
<v Speaker 2>behind the scenes glimpse into the way out loud works,

0:03:46.674 --> 0:03:49.394
<v Speaker 2>our friend Emily Vernham jumped into our slack channel, which

0:03:49.394 --> 0:03:52.194
<v Speaker 2>is where we like put all our links for things

0:03:52.194 --> 0:03:54.474
<v Speaker 2>we want to discuss, and then we whittled them down,

0:03:55.074 --> 0:03:59.194
<v Speaker 2>and she had written basic bitch news pitch. This sexy

0:03:59.234 --> 0:04:02.434
<v Speaker 2>politician is all over my social feeds. What does he

0:04:02.514 --> 0:04:07.634
<v Speaker 2>want from me? She was talking about Zoran Ma Danni,

0:04:08.114 --> 0:04:10.914
<v Speaker 2>the man who is suddenly all over my feeds too,

0:04:11.434 --> 0:04:14.194
<v Speaker 2>along with his unofficial theme song which I'm about to

0:04:14.234 --> 0:04:14.554
<v Speaker 2>play you.

0:04:16.194 --> 0:04:20.474
<v Speaker 4>The name is mom Dannie M.

0:04:20.514 --> 0:04:21.634
<v Speaker 1>The name is.

0:04:21.594 --> 0:04:23.714
<v Speaker 2>Mom Dannie M.

0:04:24.914 --> 0:04:30.394
<v Speaker 4>You should learn how to say it M.

0:04:30.594 --> 0:04:32.313
<v Speaker 2>He should learn how to say it.

0:04:32.354 --> 0:04:34.873
<v Speaker 3>Is that his voice so he's actually singing that.

0:04:35.113 --> 0:04:36.993
<v Speaker 2>What he did is he said it at a debate

0:04:37.474 --> 0:04:40.833
<v Speaker 2>where his opponent kept like mispronouncing his name and mispronouncing

0:04:40.834 --> 0:04:43.154
<v Speaker 2>his name. So he said it, and he said, and

0:04:43.193 --> 0:04:45.473
<v Speaker 2>you should learn how to say it. Because he was

0:04:45.513 --> 0:04:47.153
<v Speaker 2>about to say, because I'm going to be your mayor,

0:04:47.234 --> 0:04:49.474
<v Speaker 2>and he pulled himself back from the edge, and then

0:04:49.513 --> 0:04:54.354
<v Speaker 2>they've taken it and put it on honestly the ICONICYI Anyway,

0:04:54.354 --> 0:04:57.754
<v Speaker 2>the reason I know all this when I literally had

0:04:57.794 --> 0:05:00.233
<v Speaker 2>never seen this man before the last forty eight hours,

0:05:00.274 --> 0:05:03.753
<v Speaker 2>it's because of the invasion of my internet. Emilia Lester,

0:05:04.234 --> 0:05:06.953
<v Speaker 2>you know who he is. Tell us about Zorah mum

0:05:07.193 --> 0:05:09.433
<v Speaker 2>Dani and why we all need to know.

0:05:09.993 --> 0:05:12.714
<v Speaker 1>So by the time you're listening to this out lauders,

0:05:12.753 --> 0:05:16.833
<v Speaker 1>and unless something very unexpected has happened, Zauren mum Danny

0:05:16.993 --> 0:05:19.273
<v Speaker 1>will be the new mayor of New York City, and

0:05:19.313 --> 0:05:21.674
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of notable things about him. He is

0:05:21.794 --> 0:05:24.753
<v Speaker 1>going to be the youngest mayor in over a century.

0:05:24.794 --> 0:05:28.713
<v Speaker 1>He's thirty four. He will be New York's first Muslim mayor.

0:05:29.513 --> 0:05:33.073
<v Speaker 1>And he's also excited young people, not just in New

0:05:33.154 --> 0:05:36.113
<v Speaker 1>York but also across the United States and also the

0:05:36.154 --> 0:05:39.074
<v Speaker 1>world in a way that we haven't seen since maybe

0:05:39.113 --> 0:05:41.433
<v Speaker 1>Barack Obama. That's how big it is.

0:05:41.633 --> 0:05:44.234
<v Speaker 3>Some of the commentary that I saw probably a few

0:05:44.234 --> 0:05:46.513
<v Speaker 3>months ago actually when he appeared on the scene.

0:05:46.513 --> 0:05:48.753
<v Speaker 2>Are you cooling, Yeah? I am.

0:05:48.914 --> 0:05:51.313
<v Speaker 3>I don't know where you've been. But I was saying

0:05:51.393 --> 0:05:53.953
<v Speaker 3>his I'm going to say a beautiful face, and that

0:05:54.073 --> 0:05:57.873
<v Speaker 3>caught my attention, and some commentary said, this is the

0:05:58.594 --> 0:06:01.473
<v Speaker 3>sort of Democrats answer to Trump. This is how you

0:06:01.513 --> 0:06:04.034
<v Speaker 3>beat Trump. This man, what do they mean by that?

0:06:04.433 --> 0:06:06.674
<v Speaker 1>I think that we just haven't seen this level of

0:06:06.753 --> 0:06:09.594
<v Speaker 1>enthusias him in a really long time. I'm going to

0:06:09.834 --> 0:06:12.433
<v Speaker 1>put a dampener on this and say that New York

0:06:12.433 --> 0:06:16.354
<v Speaker 1>City is not America. It is very liberal. It's got

0:06:16.433 --> 0:06:19.394
<v Speaker 1>a very different voting population to the rest of America.

0:06:19.594 --> 0:06:23.674
<v Speaker 1>And Zoran is a Democratic socialist. He's very left wing,

0:06:24.113 --> 0:06:26.674
<v Speaker 1>so it's kind of unlikely he's going to take the

0:06:26.714 --> 0:06:30.553
<v Speaker 1>whole country by storm. But what I've taken away from

0:06:30.553 --> 0:06:35.074
<v Speaker 1>this is that charisma is still really important, arguably more

0:06:35.113 --> 0:06:37.873
<v Speaker 1>important than it's ever been for politicians. This man is

0:06:37.914 --> 0:06:40.633
<v Speaker 1>good looking, he has kind eyes, He is great on

0:06:40.674 --> 0:06:43.914
<v Speaker 1>social media. Here, just as an example, listen to this

0:06:44.154 --> 0:06:47.953
<v Speaker 1>ad that he made to play during The Golden Bachelor,

0:06:48.034 --> 0:06:50.354
<v Speaker 1>and keep in mind that as he's speaking here, he

0:06:50.433 --> 0:06:53.113
<v Speaker 1>is walking towards the camera holding a rose.

0:06:56.193 --> 0:06:59.273
<v Speaker 4>You deserve better, You deserve to be able to raise

0:06:59.313 --> 0:07:03.153
<v Speaker 4>your family. Here, to be safe to travel where you

0:07:03.193 --> 0:07:06.794
<v Speaker 4>need to free of costs and worry. You deserve someone

0:07:06.794 --> 0:07:09.713
<v Speaker 4>who as hard as you do, who thinks about you

0:07:10.554 --> 0:07:13.314
<v Speaker 4>every second of the day. That's the kind of mayor

0:07:13.354 --> 0:07:15.234
<v Speaker 4>I promised to be New York.

0:07:16.393 --> 0:07:20.474
<v Speaker 3>Will you accept this Russ paid for by Zoron for NYC.

0:07:21.154 --> 0:07:22.994
<v Speaker 1>He that completely gets me.

0:07:23.194 --> 0:07:26.994
<v Speaker 2>Exceptionally good at social media because in the last twenty

0:07:26.994 --> 0:07:28.634
<v Speaker 2>four hours, when I've done this deep dive, I've seen

0:07:28.674 --> 0:07:31.473
<v Speaker 2>him do that. I've also seen him do a million

0:07:31.594 --> 0:07:34.554
<v Speaker 2>kind of questionnaires with influences on the streets of New York.

0:07:34.554 --> 0:07:36.114
<v Speaker 2>I've seen him at night, I've seen him in the morning.

0:07:36.114 --> 0:07:39.153
<v Speaker 2>I've seen him like he totally gets the twenty four

0:07:39.154 --> 0:07:42.713
<v Speaker 2>to seven, always on, jump on a trend's social media stuff, right?

0:07:42.834 --> 0:07:45.314
<v Speaker 2>Is that a large part of why people are saying

0:07:45.834 --> 0:07:47.953
<v Speaker 2>this is what you need to be now? Yeah?

0:07:47.994 --> 0:07:50.194
<v Speaker 1>I think so. But there are lots of politicians you

0:07:50.314 --> 0:07:52.754
<v Speaker 1>post a lot on social media and people are not

0:07:52.914 --> 0:07:55.834
<v Speaker 1>sending like the emoji with the love hearts about them,

0:07:55.874 --> 0:07:58.914
<v Speaker 1>Like JD Vanntce, the Vice President. He's big on social media.

0:07:58.994 --> 0:08:01.754
<v Speaker 1>I don't think anyone's like wanting to hear him play

0:08:01.794 --> 0:08:05.153
<v Speaker 1>The Golden Bachelor anytime soon. I've got a question for

0:08:05.234 --> 0:08:09.393
<v Speaker 1>the group, because obviously his agenda has really excited a

0:08:09.393 --> 0:08:11.834
<v Speaker 1>lot of young progressives. We're not going to talk about

0:08:11.834 --> 0:08:14.514
<v Speaker 1>his policy positions here. The question I want to ask

0:08:14.674 --> 0:08:17.554
<v Speaker 1>is is charisma just being good looking?

0:08:18.074 --> 0:08:22.754
<v Speaker 3>No, there's something else. There's this confidence that he has.

0:08:22.874 --> 0:08:27.194
<v Speaker 3>He's obviously incredibly articulate, but I think that the charisma

0:08:27.234 --> 0:08:31.234
<v Speaker 3>in this context also comes from being what feels like

0:08:31.354 --> 0:08:35.114
<v Speaker 3>anti establishment, whether it is or it isn't. He feels

0:08:35.194 --> 0:08:38.874
<v Speaker 3>like a rebel, which is what probably, you know, the

0:08:38.874 --> 0:08:42.154
<v Speaker 3>climate in the US wants right now. It's funny though,

0:08:42.194 --> 0:08:45.114
<v Speaker 3>because it's like, do you need that to be a leader,

0:08:45.234 --> 0:08:48.434
<v Speaker 3>Because when we look at politicians in Australia charisma. We

0:08:48.674 --> 0:08:51.874
<v Speaker 3>actually had a conversation about this recently and Jackie Lamby

0:08:51.914 --> 0:08:54.354
<v Speaker 3>came up where people go, she's got charisma.

0:08:54.114 --> 0:08:56.154
<v Speaker 2>And I got in a lot of trouble for saying,

0:08:56.234 --> 0:08:58.954
<v Speaker 2>and I stand by it that Barnaby Joyce has charisma.

0:08:58.994 --> 0:09:01.634
<v Speaker 3>Well he's a character, isn't he. Yah, And there are

0:09:01.634 --> 0:09:04.914
<v Speaker 3>a lot of successful politicians in Australia who I wouldn't

0:09:04.954 --> 0:09:08.914
<v Speaker 3>say have charisma. So I wonder if we are because

0:09:08.954 --> 0:09:13.234
<v Speaker 3>of the social media age, do politicians need to be

0:09:13.394 --> 0:09:17.353
<v Speaker 3>creators now, like first and foremost almost influences.

0:09:17.394 --> 0:09:20.274
<v Speaker 2>They either do or they need some people on their

0:09:20.274 --> 0:09:22.834
<v Speaker 2>team who they work very closely with and trust very

0:09:22.914 --> 0:09:25.674
<v Speaker 2>much who do know how to do that. But back

0:09:25.714 --> 0:09:27.994
<v Speaker 2>to the charisma point, because we had this discussion is

0:09:28.074 --> 0:09:31.274
<v Speaker 2>charisma just good looking a while ago when we were

0:09:31.354 --> 0:09:35.034
<v Speaker 2>unpacking that and saying no, because Donald Trump has charisma.

0:09:35.074 --> 0:09:36.514
<v Speaker 2>And the thing is is if you hate the people

0:09:36.514 --> 0:09:39.034
<v Speaker 2>whose names I'm saying, then you're saying to your phone

0:09:39.074 --> 0:09:41.074
<v Speaker 2>right now, no he doesn't, No, he doesn't. But if

0:09:41.154 --> 0:09:44.354
<v Speaker 2>you ask yourself the question of why in an attention

0:09:44.474 --> 0:09:47.674
<v Speaker 2>economy we are always looking at these people and listening

0:09:47.754 --> 0:09:50.754
<v Speaker 2>to these people and talking about these people, it is

0:09:50.794 --> 0:09:52.954
<v Speaker 2>in part because they have a lot of charisma. And

0:09:53.034 --> 0:09:55.474
<v Speaker 2>I was thinking about it and thinking that I think

0:09:55.554 --> 0:09:57.874
<v Speaker 2>maybe what charisma is, and it's a very hard thing

0:09:57.914 --> 0:10:01.234
<v Speaker 2>to harness, is that you want to watch them and

0:10:01.314 --> 0:10:04.914
<v Speaker 2>listen to them whatever they're saying, even if you don't agree.

0:10:05.034 --> 0:10:07.594
<v Speaker 2>You know what I mean. Age you hear people say

0:10:07.634 --> 0:10:10.114
<v Speaker 2>I'd watch that person read the phone book or whatever

0:10:10.154 --> 0:10:12.034
<v Speaker 2>they say, those kind of things like there are some

0:10:12.194 --> 0:10:15.514
<v Speaker 2>people who have a watchability and a listenability that it

0:10:15.554 --> 0:10:19.314
<v Speaker 2>didn't used to matter so much when we didn't filter

0:10:19.514 --> 0:10:23.034
<v Speaker 2>everything through our phones and basically through video, but now

0:10:23.074 --> 0:10:26.394
<v Speaker 2>we do. You have got to get attention, and if

0:10:26.434 --> 0:10:28.914
<v Speaker 2>you are really astley, it's not fair to say dull,

0:10:28.954 --> 0:10:31.474
<v Speaker 2>because I don't think the opposite of charismatic is dull.

0:10:31.594 --> 0:10:34.514
<v Speaker 2>I think there are lots of very smart, articulate people

0:10:34.834 --> 0:10:38.274
<v Speaker 2>who aren't charismatic. But it's like it has to be

0:10:38.354 --> 0:10:41.594
<v Speaker 2>the thing now to get attention, don't you think, Well.

0:10:41.514 --> 0:10:45.554
<v Speaker 1>But does it? Because does Anthony Albanesi have charisma? He's

0:10:45.674 --> 0:10:47.274
<v Speaker 1>very successful as a politician.

0:10:47.714 --> 0:10:51.874
<v Speaker 2>Very good question, because Jesse, do you think Albanesi has charisma?

0:10:52.354 --> 0:10:55.794
<v Speaker 3>You know, I saw a glimpse of it recently when

0:10:55.834 --> 0:10:57.634
<v Speaker 3>he was at a round table with Trump and there

0:10:57.674 --> 0:11:00.314
<v Speaker 3>was the comment about who made the mean tweet about

0:11:00.354 --> 0:11:01.954
<v Speaker 3>him and he kind of had this funny look at

0:11:02.034 --> 0:11:04.794
<v Speaker 3>Kevin Rudd and I saw him deal with that in

0:11:04.874 --> 0:11:08.954
<v Speaker 3>quite a natural or thing then tick away and I

0:11:08.994 --> 0:11:11.674
<v Speaker 3>have found some of his appearances there to be charismatic.

0:11:12.194 --> 0:11:14.714
<v Speaker 3>Maybe maybe his personality is part of it.

0:11:14.874 --> 0:11:17.914
<v Speaker 1>I think that that moment with Trump was so telling

0:11:18.034 --> 0:11:21.274
<v Speaker 1>because that could have been one of the worst moments

0:11:21.314 --> 0:11:25.034
<v Speaker 1>of Anthony Albanese's life So high Stakes. A Sky News

0:11:25.074 --> 0:11:28.354
<v Speaker 1>reporter from Australia wants to stir up some shit and

0:11:28.394 --> 0:11:30.474
<v Speaker 1>he says to Donald Trump, do you know that the

0:11:30.554 --> 0:11:33.594
<v Speaker 1>guy that Anthony albanezeis sent to Washington to be your

0:11:33.634 --> 0:11:38.474
<v Speaker 1>ambassador said terrible things about you? And instead of freaking out,

0:11:38.634 --> 0:11:42.034
<v Speaker 1>instead of starting to sort of give excuses and sort

0:11:42.074 --> 0:11:46.034
<v Speaker 1>of hesitate and make explanations up, he just sat there

0:11:46.074 --> 0:11:48.354
<v Speaker 1>and he grinned, and he seemed to be having a

0:11:48.394 --> 0:11:51.634
<v Speaker 1>good time. He seemed comfortable in his own skin, and

0:11:51.674 --> 0:11:54.834
<v Speaker 1>he seemed to be enjoying himself. And I'm starting to

0:11:54.954 --> 0:11:57.194
<v Speaker 1>wonder if, in this day and age, when the news

0:11:57.274 --> 0:12:01.314
<v Speaker 1>is so bleak and dark and serious, whether we kind

0:12:01.314 --> 0:12:05.314
<v Speaker 1>of want politicians who seem to be not hating every moment.

0:12:05.474 --> 0:12:07.754
<v Speaker 2>That's so interesting you say that, Amili, because when I

0:12:07.834 --> 0:12:11.154
<v Speaker 2>was doing my mum Dani deep dive today, there are

0:12:11.194 --> 0:12:13.354
<v Speaker 2>a million pieces on the internet, as I discovered in

0:12:13.394 --> 0:12:16.314
<v Speaker 2>the last twelve hours, and I'm like, you are quite

0:12:16.394 --> 0:12:19.834
<v Speaker 2>like today Holly, about the lessons he can teach us

0:12:19.834 --> 0:12:25.754
<v Speaker 2>all about leadership all across this man, Yes, very much,

0:12:26.114 --> 0:12:28.794
<v Speaker 2>but this is very interesting. One of the pieces said

0:12:29.314 --> 0:12:33.434
<v Speaker 2>he has a happy warrior spirit, serious about the fight,

0:12:34.074 --> 0:12:37.834
<v Speaker 2>light on bitterness, confident that persuasion is still possible. And

0:12:37.874 --> 0:12:40.674
<v Speaker 2>that is what you were just describing. Then, is this

0:12:41.114 --> 0:12:43.554
<v Speaker 2>he leans into beef, which I think is something that

0:12:43.674 --> 0:12:46.154
<v Speaker 2>an older generation. I'm going to generalize enormously, but gen

0:12:46.314 --> 0:12:48.434
<v Speaker 2>xes don't like that. I don't like that. Right, But

0:12:48.594 --> 0:12:51.234
<v Speaker 2>he leans into beef, but not in a mean way,

0:12:51.674 --> 0:12:53.434
<v Speaker 2>in a kind of I'll go to Fox News, I'll

0:12:53.434 --> 0:12:56.274
<v Speaker 2>talk to my opponents. But he's got a lightness about

0:12:56.314 --> 0:12:58.274
<v Speaker 2>him as he's dealing with very heavy things. Do we

0:12:58.474 --> 0:12:58.794
<v Speaker 2>like that?

0:12:59.074 --> 0:13:02.354
<v Speaker 1>Yes? And let's listen to a clip of when he

0:13:02.594 --> 0:13:06.514
<v Speaker 1>got asked about something Donald Trump had said about him

0:13:06.634 --> 0:13:08.194
<v Speaker 1>just recently in the last couple of days.

0:13:09.114 --> 0:13:11.874
<v Speaker 4>Assemblymen, any response to President Trump saying he's better looking

0:13:11.874 --> 0:13:12.474
<v Speaker 4>than you?

0:13:13.834 --> 0:13:14.434
<v Speaker 1>I think we have not.

0:13:14.474 --> 0:13:16.234
<v Speaker 3>My focus is on the cost of living crass.

0:13:16.634 --> 0:13:19.834
<v Speaker 1>He just grins, he laughs, and he keeps walking.

0:13:19.794 --> 0:13:22.434
<v Speaker 2>And he stays on message. This brings us to the

0:13:22.474 --> 0:13:26.514
<v Speaker 2>thorny issue of whether or not women are allowed to

0:13:26.594 --> 0:13:30.354
<v Speaker 2>have this kind of charisma and leadership right because Kamala

0:13:30.394 --> 0:13:32.714
<v Speaker 2>Harris has been everywhere in the last couple of weeks

0:13:32.714 --> 0:13:35.953
<v Speaker 2>promoting her memoir you know, I played that jaunty tune

0:13:36.034 --> 0:13:38.434
<v Speaker 2>at the beginning. Remember how hard we all tried to

0:13:38.434 --> 0:13:41.554
<v Speaker 2>make that happen with Kamala, the dancing videos, bratt and

0:13:41.634 --> 0:13:45.074
<v Speaker 2>all that stuff, and it just didn't quite work. On

0:13:45.114 --> 0:13:48.554
<v Speaker 2>the list of most charismatic leaders in the world, there

0:13:48.554 --> 0:13:51.554
<v Speaker 2>are only two women that I have seen, and to

0:13:51.634 --> 0:13:52.994
<v Speaker 2>be fair, we have to make it clear that there

0:13:53.034 --> 0:13:55.554
<v Speaker 2>are far fewer women in leadership roles. We haven't got

0:13:55.594 --> 0:13:58.394
<v Speaker 2>as many versions of leadership to dissect when it comes

0:13:58.394 --> 0:14:00.554
<v Speaker 2>to women. But one of them is just Cindra Adun Yeah,

0:14:00.594 --> 0:14:03.953
<v Speaker 2>no question. Angela Merkle was also on that list, right,

0:14:03.994 --> 0:14:07.114
<v Speaker 2>two very different kinds of women with very different leadership stuff.

0:14:08.074 --> 0:14:10.874
<v Speaker 2>Have we figured out what kind of charisma we like

0:14:10.914 --> 0:14:14.114
<v Speaker 2>in women and why Kamala was deemed to not have it,

0:14:14.194 --> 0:14:17.674
<v Speaker 2>even though on paper she was very cool, young, you know,

0:14:17.874 --> 0:14:18.794
<v Speaker 2>like engaged.

0:14:19.274 --> 0:14:22.314
<v Speaker 3>Some of the analysis I read was that something about

0:14:22.394 --> 0:14:26.674
<v Speaker 3>this campaign has been incredibly organic, and I think especially

0:14:26.754 --> 0:14:33.114
<v Speaker 3>gen Z and millennial audiences can see straight through strategy,

0:14:33.434 --> 0:14:36.554
<v Speaker 3>so they can really see Harris. When you look back

0:14:36.554 --> 0:14:39.594
<v Speaker 3>at her campaign, there were parts of it that felt

0:14:39.914 --> 0:14:43.034
<v Speaker 3>so forced because they knew they had to harness the

0:14:43.594 --> 0:14:46.434
<v Speaker 3>you know, young people vote, and they went ran really

0:14:46.434 --> 0:14:49.874
<v Speaker 3>hard at TikTok and they wanted, you know, lots of

0:14:49.874 --> 0:14:53.354
<v Speaker 3>people to come out and endorse her, and some of

0:14:53.514 --> 0:14:57.754
<v Speaker 3>that felt a bit contrived, I think, whereas this just

0:14:58.034 --> 0:15:00.754
<v Speaker 3>has seemed and maybe it's because he's had a longer

0:15:00.834 --> 0:15:02.634
<v Speaker 3>run up. I think that probably has a lot to

0:15:02.714 --> 0:15:06.394
<v Speaker 3>answer for. But every YouTube channel, to something on Twitch,

0:15:06.514 --> 0:15:08.754
<v Speaker 3>to something on blah, like he's not just doing call

0:15:08.794 --> 0:15:11.634
<v Speaker 3>her daddy, He's not even doing that, he's there, does

0:15:11.634 --> 0:15:15.474
<v Speaker 3>seem to be something more organic about his identity on

0:15:15.514 --> 0:15:16.234
<v Speaker 3>sorche So, if you've.

0:15:16.154 --> 0:15:19.474
<v Speaker 2>Got a charismatic candidate, was we discussed you go your

0:15:19.594 --> 0:15:23.154
<v Speaker 2>charismatic people like to watch you. Let's put you everywhere

0:15:23.154 --> 0:15:24.954
<v Speaker 2>we can where people can watch you do stuff.

0:15:25.274 --> 0:15:28.994
<v Speaker 1>The thing that concerns me is that we're sort of

0:15:29.074 --> 0:15:32.714
<v Speaker 1>coalescing around a twenty twenty five definition of charisma, which

0:15:32.754 --> 0:15:35.474
<v Speaker 1>says that you have to be a happy warrior. You

0:15:35.554 --> 0:15:37.594
<v Speaker 1>have to look like you're having fun, you have to

0:15:37.634 --> 0:15:40.514
<v Speaker 1>be natural, you have to be quote unquote authentic and hot.

0:15:40.914 --> 0:15:43.754
<v Speaker 2>Ideally not necessarily, but it helps.

0:15:43.834 --> 0:15:47.194
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And what concerns me is that women are not

0:15:47.354 --> 0:15:53.514
<v Speaker 1>granted permission to be jocular happy warriors, casual whatever, like

0:15:53.634 --> 0:15:57.474
<v Speaker 1>go with the flow. In fact, Camera and Hillary Clinton

0:15:57.874 --> 0:16:01.634
<v Speaker 1>both were criticized for guess what, they're laugh They're not

0:16:01.754 --> 0:16:07.114
<v Speaker 1>even allowed to laugh for a Zoran is always laughing. Yeah,

0:16:07.194 --> 0:16:10.034
<v Speaker 1>And what does that mean for women in the public eye?

0:16:10.034 --> 0:16:13.394
<v Speaker 3>And the way that he is also afforded grace when

0:16:13.394 --> 0:16:15.674
<v Speaker 3>it comes to conflict, which women are. I mean, if

0:16:15.714 --> 0:16:17.514
<v Speaker 3>you learnt into conflict as a woman, then you would

0:16:17.554 --> 0:16:20.434
<v Speaker 3>be called a bitch. So the difficulty with charisma is

0:16:20.434 --> 0:16:22.314
<v Speaker 3>that in defining it, it's all about a vibe, it's

0:16:22.314 --> 0:16:25.034
<v Speaker 3>all about a feeling, but it is incredibly gendered. I mean,

0:16:25.074 --> 0:16:27.474
<v Speaker 3>what's exciting is that this is a man from a

0:16:27.514 --> 0:16:28.754
<v Speaker 3>diverse background, which.

0:16:28.674 --> 0:16:30.234
<v Speaker 1>Is in terms of he's an immigrant.

0:16:30.314 --> 0:16:33.554
<v Speaker 3>He's an immigrant and a Muslim man who looks different

0:16:33.634 --> 0:16:37.074
<v Speaker 3>to any man that New York has ever seen. So

0:16:37.674 --> 0:16:40.794
<v Speaker 3>the fact that he has been able to kind of,

0:16:40.874 --> 0:16:44.554
<v Speaker 3>I don't know, create this cult of personality is really refreshing.

0:16:45.314 --> 0:16:48.194
<v Speaker 3>But I don't think we can pretend like charisma hasn't

0:16:48.514 --> 0:16:49.874
<v Speaker 3>historically always been reserved.

0:16:50.194 --> 0:16:54.074
<v Speaker 2>He has charisma. Ac has bags of charisma.

0:16:53.514 --> 0:16:56.394
<v Speaker 1>And she's got the happy warrior thing, which is true.

0:16:56.594 --> 0:16:59.194
<v Speaker 1>Kamala was people said she was a lunatic because she

0:16:59.274 --> 0:17:00.034
<v Speaker 1>laughed so much.

0:17:00.114 --> 0:17:00.834
<v Speaker 2>It came up.

0:17:00.714 --> 0:17:03.834
<v Speaker 1>Again and again, this idea that she almost seemed unhinged.

0:17:04.354 --> 0:17:08.354
<v Speaker 1>Is there anyone in Australia who's happy warrior? Who's warrior?

0:17:08.554 --> 0:17:10.553
<v Speaker 3>I think Jackie Lamby. You know, you don't have to

0:17:10.594 --> 0:17:13.914
<v Speaker 3>agree with all her politics, but she definitely courts attention

0:17:14.074 --> 0:17:16.994
<v Speaker 3>and I think that that is due to some charisma.

0:17:17.594 --> 0:17:20.194
<v Speaker 3>But I wonder if you know, maybe the misstep of

0:17:20.234 --> 0:17:23.834
<v Speaker 3>Harris was that there were a lot of influencers who

0:17:23.874 --> 0:17:26.754
<v Speaker 3>went and endorsed her. And there's all this controversy about

0:17:26.754 --> 0:17:30.234
<v Speaker 3>whether we won our celebrities, or our lifestyle influences or

0:17:30.314 --> 0:17:33.033
<v Speaker 3>our pop culture podcast to tell us who to vote for. Like,

0:17:33.034 --> 0:17:35.194
<v Speaker 3>that's a question that I still don't think has been answered.

0:17:35.234 --> 0:17:37.114
<v Speaker 2>I think it's been answered and the answer.

0:17:37.274 --> 0:17:39.914
<v Speaker 3>No, Okay, So if we don't, I think that this

0:17:39.994 --> 0:17:43.553
<v Speaker 3>is the next logical step, which is that the politician

0:17:43.874 --> 0:17:45.514
<v Speaker 3>must become the influence.

0:17:46.034 --> 0:17:50.914
<v Speaker 2>Yes, that's so true in a moment. If we just

0:17:51.034 --> 0:17:54.273
<v Speaker 2>watched more rom coms, then apparently we'd be better at dating,

0:17:54.634 --> 0:18:01.794
<v Speaker 2>says the Queen of the rom com Reese Witherspoon. Knows

0:18:01.834 --> 0:18:04.794
<v Speaker 2>why we're all so bad at dating now it's because

0:18:04.874 --> 0:18:08.674
<v Speaker 2>of the decline of the romantic common Let's hear her theory.

0:18:08.754 --> 0:18:11.474
<v Speaker 2>She's talking to my mate Dax Shepherd on Armchair Expert.

0:18:11.794 --> 0:18:14.834
<v Speaker 5>Do you know how there's been like the past ten years,

0:18:15.154 --> 0:18:17.994
<v Speaker 5>even I would even say past fifteen years, is decline

0:18:18.194 --> 0:18:21.194
<v Speaker 5>in like the making of rom coms or like legitimate

0:18:21.314 --> 0:18:25.034
<v Speaker 5>big movie stars being in rom coms in Blockbuster. Yeah, yeah,

0:18:25.314 --> 0:18:27.834
<v Speaker 5>I think it's not just rom com movies. But I

0:18:27.874 --> 0:18:31.154
<v Speaker 5>also think the rom com television show, the television show

0:18:31.194 --> 0:18:34.354
<v Speaker 5>that you watched when you were eleven, twelve, and thirteen

0:18:34.394 --> 0:18:40.034
<v Speaker 5>that made you practice, like imagine and visualized dating skills. Okay,

0:18:40.394 --> 0:18:43.553
<v Speaker 5>I like that girl. I'm gonna ask her out. Oh

0:18:43.434 --> 0:18:44.074
<v Speaker 5>what she says?

0:18:44.114 --> 0:18:44.194
<v Speaker 4>No?

0:18:44.274 --> 0:18:46.594
<v Speaker 5>Okay, Well, my favorite character in the television show did that.

0:18:46.834 --> 0:18:49.434
<v Speaker 5>Everybody hates Chris and he Chris asked out the hot

0:18:49.434 --> 0:18:52.273
<v Speaker 5>girl and she said no, But the other girl she

0:18:52.354 --> 0:18:54.674
<v Speaker 5>really likes him, and he can't tell. Social media started

0:18:54.714 --> 0:18:57.794
<v Speaker 5>and then we stopped. We started kind of going rom

0:18:57.834 --> 0:18:59.994
<v Speaker 5>coms are cringey, But it was actually where we learned

0:18:59.994 --> 0:19:03.754
<v Speaker 5>social dynamics from Tom Hanks and Meg Ryan.

0:19:03.914 --> 0:19:06.234
<v Speaker 2>I'm talking on the phone, can talk on the phone.

0:19:06.234 --> 0:19:08.754
<v Speaker 3>Now, No, I don't think any witty.

0:19:08.474 --> 0:19:14.833
<v Speaker 2>Banter, Yeah, oh, witty banter before we decide if we

0:19:14.914 --> 0:19:18.794
<v Speaker 2>agree with this or not. She's definitely giving Reese's giving

0:19:18.834 --> 0:19:21.554
<v Speaker 2>peak gen X nostalgia with this. I am that fuck

0:19:21.594 --> 0:19:24.994
<v Speaker 2>with who's always throwing in when Harry met Sally references

0:19:25.594 --> 0:19:28.434
<v Speaker 2>references to my friends when they want dailing advice, and

0:19:28.514 --> 0:19:29.954
<v Speaker 2>Reese ages us.

0:19:31.354 --> 0:19:32.434
<v Speaker 3>To start to move on.

0:19:32.594 --> 0:19:36.434
<v Speaker 2>Jesse, do you agree with this rom com dating theory?

0:19:37.394 --> 0:19:40.514
<v Speaker 3>Look on the surface. I listened to this clip and went,

0:19:40.754 --> 0:19:43.394
<v Speaker 3>do I agree with your premise? Because yes, while there

0:19:43.434 --> 0:19:46.354
<v Speaker 3>has been a decline in Blockbuster, go to the movies,

0:19:46.394 --> 0:19:50.234
<v Speaker 3>watch when Harry met Sally that experience the summer, I

0:19:50.274 --> 0:19:53.234
<v Speaker 3>turned pretty nobody wants this biggest show to the year, right,

0:19:53.314 --> 0:19:55.154
<v Speaker 3>And the movie I went to see at the movies

0:19:55.554 --> 0:19:58.234
<v Speaker 3>this year I think was Bridget Jones. I think I

0:19:58.314 --> 0:19:58.874
<v Speaker 3>was alone in that.

0:19:59.194 --> 0:20:01.914
<v Speaker 1>But it's not really a rom com.

0:20:01.594 --> 0:20:06.154
<v Speaker 2>I know, but and also, having had to suffer through

0:20:06.234 --> 0:20:08.994
<v Speaker 2>some summer out an pretty no offense to everyone who

0:20:09.034 --> 0:20:09.394
<v Speaker 2>loves it.

0:20:09.434 --> 0:20:13.154
<v Speaker 3>There's no common there's a lot of rocks, but nobody

0:20:13.154 --> 0:20:13.474
<v Speaker 3>wants it.

0:20:13.594 --> 0:20:15.474
<v Speaker 2>I take your point, but that is almost a reaction

0:20:15.554 --> 0:20:17.234
<v Speaker 2>to the decline of the rom comms, right, because the

0:20:17.274 --> 0:20:19.794
<v Speaker 2>rom coms declined and now people are trying to bring

0:20:19.834 --> 0:20:20.154
<v Speaker 2>them back.

0:20:20.274 --> 0:20:25.354
<v Speaker 3>Yes, and apparently this is a studied phenomenon that in

0:20:26.034 --> 0:20:29.954
<v Speaker 3>two thousand and three or whatever, the top ten movies

0:20:29.994 --> 0:20:32.114
<v Speaker 3>were just all you couldn't name, and we would have

0:20:32.154 --> 0:20:34.514
<v Speaker 3>seen all of them, all of them that were at

0:20:34.514 --> 0:20:37.194
<v Speaker 3>the box office. Everyone was watching rom coms. And then

0:20:37.314 --> 0:20:38.714
<v Speaker 3>something Happened was.

0:20:38.674 --> 0:20:41.354
<v Speaker 1>The plot of all of them. Sandra Bullock decides that

0:20:41.434 --> 0:20:43.994
<v Speaker 1>her career is in everything and falls into Ye was

0:20:44.074 --> 0:20:45.674
<v Speaker 1>a handsome man almost always.

0:20:45.834 --> 0:20:48.074
<v Speaker 3>And then there was a Julia Roberts, and there was

0:20:48.114 --> 0:20:50.474
<v Speaker 3>a Hugh Grant, and there was a Kate Hudson, and

0:20:50.514 --> 0:20:52.754
<v Speaker 3>of course Catherine Heigel was in all of them. She

0:20:53.034 --> 0:20:55.434
<v Speaker 3>was and I enjoyed them. That's what I was going

0:20:55.514 --> 0:20:59.754
<v Speaker 3>to watch. I don't think we should over romanticize some

0:20:59.794 --> 0:21:03.914
<v Speaker 3>of the tropes in those films that were often fat phobic,

0:21:04.274 --> 0:21:10.234
<v Speaker 3>you know, exclusively hetero, that were about a man pursuing

0:21:10.234 --> 0:21:13.714
<v Speaker 3>a woman who said no, but he just kept pursuing.

0:21:13.954 --> 0:21:16.634
<v Speaker 3>Harry Mett Sally was about how manyamen can't be friends.

0:21:16.674 --> 0:21:18.754
<v Speaker 2>The things I learned from rom coms, I learned that

0:21:18.794 --> 0:21:20.834
<v Speaker 2>the man I hate on site is the one.

0:21:21.034 --> 0:21:25.394
<v Speaker 3>Yes, you need drama, chaos and emotional pain.

0:21:25.474 --> 0:21:28.313
<v Speaker 2>I learned there has to be an obstacle, and it

0:21:28.434 --> 0:21:31.794
<v Speaker 2>might be that that man is an absolute asshole, and

0:21:31.834 --> 0:21:34.354
<v Speaker 2>that maybe our marriage was miserable and that he didn't

0:21:34.394 --> 0:21:36.434
<v Speaker 2>support my career and we drank and Ford all the time.

0:21:36.474 --> 0:21:39.074
<v Speaker 2>But we should definitely get back together, because that's what

0:21:39.194 --> 0:21:40.914
<v Speaker 2>happens in sweetheime al Obama.

0:21:40.954 --> 0:21:43.273
<v Speaker 3>And there might have been a few back and forth

0:21:43.514 --> 0:21:47.314
<v Speaker 3>witty lines, maybe you got three or four, but they

0:21:47.394 --> 0:21:49.674
<v Speaker 3>fell in love after looking at each other and having

0:21:49.914 --> 0:21:53.354
<v Speaker 3>twelve seconds under the set of sheets, Like it wasn't

0:21:53.434 --> 0:21:56.474
<v Speaker 3>really showing us how to fall in love. But I

0:21:56.514 --> 0:21:58.874
<v Speaker 3>think over the last twenty years a few things happened right.

0:21:59.474 --> 0:22:02.714
<v Speaker 3>The first thing is an economic story, is about blockbusters

0:22:02.834 --> 0:22:07.594
<v Speaker 3>and middle of the road films that are marvel. It's

0:22:07.634 --> 0:22:11.513
<v Speaker 3>not Marvel, we don't make it. The second is feminism

0:22:11.594 --> 0:22:15.354
<v Speaker 3>slash me Too, slash the bestial test. So there was

0:22:15.394 --> 0:22:19.793
<v Speaker 3>this thing of reappraising every movie about whether or not

0:22:19.954 --> 0:22:23.954
<v Speaker 3>it was feminist enough and gender ideals and all of that.

0:22:24.914 --> 0:22:27.194
<v Speaker 3>And then the third thing, and this is where Reese

0:22:27.234 --> 0:22:31.073
<v Speaker 3>is very right, is phones I don't know how you

0:22:31.154 --> 0:22:35.834
<v Speaker 3>tell a dating story in twenty twenty five without phones,

0:22:36.274 --> 0:22:38.033
<v Speaker 3>And I don't want to watch a movie that's just

0:22:38.074 --> 0:22:42.034
<v Speaker 3>about texting and calling and blood. The tension is very

0:22:42.074 --> 0:22:46.034
<v Speaker 3>and the stakes are very hard to play with when

0:22:46.074 --> 0:22:47.994
<v Speaker 3>everyone can be contacted at every month.

0:22:48.354 --> 0:22:50.634
<v Speaker 2>Let's not forget how many works of art we all

0:22:50.634 --> 0:22:53.513
<v Speaker 2>worshiped where basically the premise was I can't get this

0:22:53.554 --> 0:22:57.114
<v Speaker 2>person on the phone. There's a phone ringing in this house.

0:22:57.674 --> 0:23:00.034
<v Speaker 2>I might not have fring it, so they can't solve

0:23:00.074 --> 0:23:03.793
<v Speaker 2>this misunderstanding that might bring us all Londone. Now I

0:23:03.794 --> 0:23:06.674
<v Speaker 2>can get him. I can get him at any time, Amelia.

0:23:07.234 --> 0:23:10.554
<v Speaker 1>Interesting that Reyese mentioned social media. So I agree with

0:23:10.594 --> 0:23:13.313
<v Speaker 1>all those explanations you gave, Jesse, but Reese sort of

0:23:13.354 --> 0:23:16.313
<v Speaker 1>pins it on social media, and I wonder why that is.

0:23:16.354 --> 0:23:20.674
<v Speaker 1>I wonder what makes rom coms antithetical to social media,

0:23:20.754 --> 0:23:24.034
<v Speaker 1>because this is something that I think millennials feel really

0:23:24.034 --> 0:23:26.914
<v Speaker 1>acutely too. Holly, you mentioned jen X, but I'm going

0:23:26.994 --> 0:23:29.674
<v Speaker 1>to point out that Disney films have gone through a

0:23:29.834 --> 0:23:33.793
<v Speaker 1>huge metamorphosis since we were growing up, Jesse. So in

0:23:33.834 --> 0:23:37.434
<v Speaker 1>the nineties and in the early two thousands, the big

0:23:37.474 --> 0:23:41.634
<v Speaker 1>Disney animated movies were always a romance like think of Aladdin,

0:23:41.794 --> 0:23:43.794
<v Speaker 1>think of Beauty and the Beast, think of The Little

0:23:43.834 --> 0:23:48.834
<v Speaker 1>Mermaidtails Milan. They were always a man and a woman, sadly,

0:23:49.074 --> 0:23:52.914
<v Speaker 1>always a heterosexual love story, fall in love and other

0:23:52.954 --> 0:23:56.354
<v Speaker 1>things happened in those movies, true, but they were fundamentally romances.

0:23:56.794 --> 0:23:59.594
<v Speaker 1>And then something happened to Disney Films.

0:24:00.194 --> 0:24:05.474
<v Speaker 3>That noise, that was a ghost. That was Sally Sally,

0:24:05.554 --> 0:24:06.874
<v Speaker 3>missus Disney Films.

0:24:08.314 --> 0:24:08.874
<v Speaker 1>Where's.

0:24:11.554 --> 0:24:14.874
<v Speaker 2>Sorry out louders the ghost just a doubt to that conversation.

0:24:15.234 --> 0:24:19.074
<v Speaker 2>I agree, but she hasn't lost your train of thought.

0:24:19.354 --> 0:24:21.874
<v Speaker 1>She sounded her plaintive. And then something happened in the

0:24:21.914 --> 0:24:27.114
<v Speaker 1>twenty tens and they became more about family trauma and drama.

0:24:27.394 --> 0:24:30.234
<v Speaker 1>Think of Encanto, think of wish and.

0:24:30.634 --> 0:24:31.674
<v Speaker 3>And ste.

0:24:32.914 --> 0:24:36.513
<v Speaker 1>Film that is a film about family trauma. So this

0:24:36.674 --> 0:24:38.754
<v Speaker 1>is not my point. This is actually a point made

0:24:38.754 --> 0:24:41.194
<v Speaker 1>by the New York Times columnist Rosstout that he thinks

0:24:41.234 --> 0:24:43.754
<v Speaker 1>that's a bad thing. He thinks that in moving away

0:24:44.354 --> 0:24:47.754
<v Speaker 1>from the glorification of the love story is the ultimate story,

0:24:47.834 --> 0:24:51.954
<v Speaker 1>we have lost an ability to build more meaningful relationships

0:24:51.954 --> 0:24:54.554
<v Speaker 1>with each other. He points to the fact that surveys

0:24:54.554 --> 0:24:57.274
<v Speaker 1>show now that parents think that what is most important

0:24:57.274 --> 0:25:00.593
<v Speaker 1>for their kids is career satisfaction and financial security, not

0:25:00.874 --> 0:25:03.634
<v Speaker 1>finding someone to love. And in the nineteen nineties, those

0:25:03.634 --> 0:25:06.914
<v Speaker 1>survey results were flipped. We have seen the results of

0:25:06.954 --> 0:25:09.914
<v Speaker 1>the deprioritization of love and it is kind of sad.

0:25:09.954 --> 0:25:11.154
<v Speaker 1>I gotta admit it is.

0:25:11.194 --> 0:25:14.434
<v Speaker 3>And it's chicken her egg, right. It's like, were we

0:25:14.514 --> 0:25:17.354
<v Speaker 3>deprioritizing it and therefore we wanted it less from our

0:25:17.354 --> 0:25:20.314
<v Speaker 3>films because we found it was just out of step

0:25:20.354 --> 0:25:24.033
<v Speaker 3>with our culture, or did our films and movies in

0:25:24.074 --> 0:25:27.234
<v Speaker 3>pop culture kind of shape that because the idea that

0:25:27.234 --> 0:25:30.794
<v Speaker 3>that's all you needed to be complete was never true.

0:25:30.874 --> 0:25:32.234
<v Speaker 3>There were a lot of things that told us that

0:25:32.394 --> 0:25:36.674
<v Speaker 3>weren't true. But there's something awfully nihilistic when you look

0:25:36.714 --> 0:25:39.074
<v Speaker 3>at the most watched Netflix shows of the year. I

0:25:39.114 --> 0:25:40.874
<v Speaker 3>was like, surely I'm going to find some rom comms

0:25:40.994 --> 0:25:44.034
<v Speaker 3>and nobody wants this was on it, But the rest

0:25:44.634 --> 0:25:46.154
<v Speaker 3>was incredibly dark.

0:25:46.394 --> 0:25:49.154
<v Speaker 2>I know why Reese brought up social media, right, it's

0:25:49.234 --> 0:25:51.634
<v Speaker 2>to do with the cringe, because you know how the

0:25:51.714 --> 0:25:55.794
<v Speaker 2>example that she used was ask the girl out right.

0:25:55.914 --> 0:25:59.634
<v Speaker 2>Every high school romance movie, most rom comms especially if

0:25:59.634 --> 0:26:02.394
<v Speaker 2>they're set in a younger environment, are like, you've got

0:26:02.394 --> 0:26:05.194
<v Speaker 2>to ask somebody out, walk up to them, get all

0:26:05.234 --> 0:26:09.674
<v Speaker 2>your nerve together, ask the man. That is not a thing.

0:26:10.394 --> 0:26:13.034
<v Speaker 2>It is not a thing. Like in young people's world,

0:26:13.234 --> 0:26:16.594
<v Speaker 2>what do you mean? I mean that between dating apps

0:26:16.594 --> 0:26:19.754
<v Speaker 2>and social media and snapchat and messaging and all those things,

0:26:20.034 --> 0:26:21.874
<v Speaker 2>no one is walking up to the hot girl at

0:26:21.874 --> 0:26:23.834
<v Speaker 2>school and saying you want to go to prom with me.

0:26:24.074 --> 0:26:27.074
<v Speaker 2>That is not happening. So I think that what Reese

0:26:27.434 --> 0:26:30.474
<v Speaker 2>means when she was saying, like using that as an example,

0:26:30.754 --> 0:26:33.874
<v Speaker 2>it's like you were all just talking about the tropes

0:26:33.914 --> 0:26:36.154
<v Speaker 2>we grew up with that may or may not have

0:26:36.194 --> 0:26:38.834
<v Speaker 2>been helpful, and how we've all got to you know,

0:26:38.954 --> 0:26:41.994
<v Speaker 2>politically correct or whatever. I would point though we talked

0:26:42.034 --> 0:26:43.594
<v Speaker 2>about this on the show the other day, that there's

0:26:43.634 --> 0:26:47.194
<v Speaker 2>this deep satisfaction for romance that's coming from books, like

0:26:47.354 --> 0:26:51.314
<v Speaker 2>those romance books are going off. But back to what

0:26:51.354 --> 0:26:54.474
<v Speaker 2>the kids are doing when we were watching rom comy

0:26:54.634 --> 0:26:57.794
<v Speaker 2>kind of shows. They're watching everything on social and there

0:26:57.834 --> 0:27:00.674
<v Speaker 2>is no way they would subject themselves to the cringe

0:27:00.914 --> 0:27:02.874
<v Speaker 2>of walking up to someone and asking them out. So

0:27:02.954 --> 0:27:05.194
<v Speaker 2>Reese is saying, how are they learning how to deal

0:27:05.194 --> 0:27:07.754
<v Speaker 2>with rejection? How are they learning? And that yes, that

0:27:07.954 --> 0:27:09.994
<v Speaker 2>one that you know, I want to ask Amelia out.

0:27:10.234 --> 0:27:12.033
<v Speaker 2>Amelia doesn't want to go out with me, but guess what,

0:27:12.114 --> 0:27:14.114
<v Speaker 2>Jesse is just looking at me with these big puppy

0:27:14.154 --> 0:27:16.594
<v Speaker 2>dog guys going but Holly, ask me, ask me, you know,

0:27:17.194 --> 0:27:19.834
<v Speaker 2>that's what she said. That's all lost and how and

0:27:20.034 --> 0:27:21.114
<v Speaker 2>how people.

0:27:20.994 --> 0:27:24.634
<v Speaker 1>Know that the way to be your hottest self is

0:27:24.674 --> 0:27:27.634
<v Speaker 1>to simply take your glasses off and pull down your hair.

0:27:27.954 --> 0:27:30.914
<v Speaker 2>I'm concerned and that always the hot one is mean

0:27:30.994 --> 0:27:33.553
<v Speaker 2>and always the plain one is nice, Like, how are

0:27:33.594 --> 0:27:35.234
<v Speaker 2>they not learning these tropes?

0:27:35.354 --> 0:27:37.793
<v Speaker 3>There was another point about social media that made me

0:27:37.874 --> 0:27:40.754
<v Speaker 3>think that it's raised the monoculture.

0:27:40.834 --> 0:27:40.994
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:27:41.074 --> 0:27:43.554
<v Speaker 3>So the idea is that when people went and saw

0:27:43.594 --> 0:27:46.474
<v Speaker 3>the traditional nineties rom com, that actually men and women

0:27:46.474 --> 0:27:49.154
<v Speaker 3>were going together, and that they were sitting in a cinema,

0:27:49.194 --> 0:27:52.273
<v Speaker 3>and that it was a defining moment date movies. It

0:27:52.314 --> 0:27:57.434
<v Speaker 3>was a date movie. Now there's this idea that men

0:27:57.474 --> 0:28:00.634
<v Speaker 3>are over here watching forty thousand hours of porn and

0:28:00.714 --> 0:28:03.434
<v Speaker 3>women are over here maybe watching the summer I turn.

0:28:03.314 --> 0:28:05.434
<v Speaker 2>Pretty, or reading their fairy books.

0:28:05.034 --> 0:28:07.994
<v Speaker 3>And then they turn up on a date and there's an.

0:28:07.914 --> 0:28:09.754
<v Speaker 1>Issue that is so sad.

0:28:10.834 --> 0:28:12.714
<v Speaker 2>Although I don't know, there were lots of men going

0:28:12.794 --> 0:28:15.634
<v Speaker 2>to see maybe when Harry met Sally and those ones. Yes,

0:28:15.714 --> 0:28:17.954
<v Speaker 2>although the stories were heterosexual, they were kind of often

0:28:17.954 --> 0:28:20.794
<v Speaker 2>told from both perspectives. Yes, Sleepless in Seattle, when Harry

0:28:20.794 --> 0:28:23.194
<v Speaker 2>met Sally, those really classically even like you've got male

0:28:23.354 --> 0:28:26.394
<v Speaker 2>or whatever, they were told from the male and female perspective.

0:28:26.474 --> 0:28:28.754
<v Speaker 3>Then what happened I was reading this analysis that said,

0:28:28.754 --> 0:28:31.394
<v Speaker 3>then what happened was the story became about men dating

0:28:31.554 --> 0:28:33.634
<v Speaker 3>over here. So even if you think about like a

0:28:34.434 --> 0:28:35.834
<v Speaker 3>knocked up or like.

0:28:35.834 --> 0:28:38.954
<v Speaker 2>Oh remember that, and when it was always something possibly

0:28:39.474 --> 0:28:42.074
<v Speaker 2>hot girl doing like a cheerleading dance thing in her

0:28:42.154 --> 0:28:44.234
<v Speaker 2>undies and this schlubby guy was like.

0:28:44.194 --> 0:28:45.434
<v Speaker 1>She likes me like that.

0:28:45.594 --> 0:28:47.394
<v Speaker 3>And then there was sex in the city. So women

0:28:47.394 --> 0:28:49.354
<v Speaker 3>were talking to women, men were talking to men, And

0:28:49.394 --> 0:28:51.714
<v Speaker 3>now there's not a place that we talk about both.

0:28:52.114 --> 0:28:56.074
<v Speaker 3>And so there's this like we're speaking different languages on dates,

0:28:56.194 --> 0:28:58.394
<v Speaker 3>which I think is an interesting theory.

0:28:58.714 --> 0:29:00.314
<v Speaker 1>And I hate to bring this up, but the other

0:29:00.474 --> 0:29:02.994
<v Speaker 1>story that made me think about this this week was

0:29:03.034 --> 0:29:07.474
<v Speaker 1>did you hear about the story about gooning? No, I'm

0:29:07.514 --> 0:29:09.794
<v Speaker 1>sorry but I need to tell you about this trend.

0:29:10.154 --> 0:29:13.634
<v Speaker 1>Apparently there is a trend amongst some young men online

0:29:13.994 --> 0:29:16.794
<v Speaker 1>to masturbate for hours on end to the point where

0:29:16.794 --> 0:29:20.474
<v Speaker 1>they enter a hallucinatory state. Now that's not very wrong,

0:29:20.594 --> 0:29:21.394
<v Speaker 1>calm friendly.

0:29:22.514 --> 0:29:25.354
<v Speaker 2>That wasn't in any of the movie was.

0:29:25.274 --> 0:29:28.354
<v Speaker 3>Talking in the analysis I read, it said when Harry

0:29:28.354 --> 0:29:31.554
<v Speaker 3>met Sally was about coming together, and now a lot

0:29:31.554 --> 0:29:34.554
<v Speaker 3>of what we consume is about coming alone. And I

0:29:34.594 --> 0:29:38.794
<v Speaker 3>was like, Oh, saddest ship I've ever read.

0:29:40.194 --> 0:29:42.394
<v Speaker 1>Come come back to us in a rom com. I

0:29:42.434 --> 0:29:44.754
<v Speaker 1>will gladly go and see you give up your high

0:29:44.754 --> 0:29:47.274
<v Speaker 1>powered legal career for a man with a truck in

0:29:47.354 --> 0:29:48.434
<v Speaker 1>Alabama once.

0:29:48.274 --> 0:29:54.074
<v Speaker 3>Again, legally blonde, Sweet Home, Alabama eleven. We're ready for it.

0:29:54.314 --> 0:29:58.994
<v Speaker 2>Speaking of romance, I need to talk to you about

0:29:59.034 --> 0:30:02.314
<v Speaker 2>some of the weirdest shit I've seen them the internet lately,

0:30:02.354 --> 0:30:03.994
<v Speaker 2>and I cannot stop thinking about it.

0:30:03.994 --> 0:30:04.874
<v Speaker 1>It's not about groooning.

0:30:05.154 --> 0:30:08.074
<v Speaker 2>It's definitely not about that. I wish I didn't know that.

0:30:09.594 --> 0:30:11.554
<v Speaker 2>In the file of things I wish I didn't know

0:30:13.154 --> 0:30:16.554
<v Speaker 2>I saw on substack this week, and look this story

0:30:16.594 --> 0:30:18.554
<v Speaker 2>I'm about to tell you. It's a quick one, but

0:30:18.794 --> 0:30:21.394
<v Speaker 2>it illustrates how hard. People are trying to get attention

0:30:21.554 --> 0:30:25.554
<v Speaker 2>on substack and other social media and I get it again.

0:30:25.674 --> 0:30:27.914
<v Speaker 2>I've got a substack out loud as sign ups, so

0:30:27.914 --> 0:30:29.994
<v Speaker 2>I don't have to go on these leaks, please my God.

0:30:30.114 --> 0:30:34.994
<v Speaker 2>And anyway, I saw a performance artist called Harriet Richardson

0:30:35.114 --> 0:30:37.954
<v Speaker 2>had just got a new tattoo, a list of names

0:30:38.234 --> 0:30:42.034
<v Speaker 2>on her torso like a nice cursive font, very attractive tour.

0:30:42.154 --> 0:30:45.714
<v Speaker 2>So the list of names are of the mothers of

0:30:45.754 --> 0:30:48.114
<v Speaker 2>the men that she has slept with in her life.

0:30:48.154 --> 0:30:49.554
<v Speaker 3>This is why we don't have rom coms.

0:30:50.634 --> 0:30:53.714
<v Speaker 2>There are fourteen of them. They look very artistic. The

0:30:53.794 --> 0:30:57.114
<v Speaker 2>name of Vicky, Dawn, Linda, Diane, Maureen, like I just

0:30:57.474 --> 0:31:03.034
<v Speaker 2>there also such great can you explain why? So she

0:31:03.194 --> 0:31:05.274
<v Speaker 2>said that she thinks that sex is a very important thing.

0:31:05.314 --> 0:31:08.474
<v Speaker 2>So some of the men who's other's names are tattooed

0:31:08.474 --> 0:31:10.234
<v Speaker 2>on her body were one night stands, and some of

0:31:10.274 --> 0:31:12.914
<v Speaker 2>them were really serious relationships that lasted years. And she

0:31:12.954 --> 0:31:16.554
<v Speaker 2>says this is all of similar importance because this is

0:31:16.594 --> 0:31:19.714
<v Speaker 2>penetrative sex that she's being very specific about. It is

0:31:19.754 --> 0:31:22.994
<v Speaker 2>such an intimate act that she wanted this act of intimacy.

0:31:22.994 --> 0:31:25.554
<v Speaker 1>I'm glad she's drawing boundaries like that it's important.

0:31:25.874 --> 0:31:32.594
<v Speaker 2>I found myself getting really indignant about this, my fictionalized

0:31:32.674 --> 0:31:35.914
<v Speaker 2>adult son who has decided to sleep with an attractive

0:31:35.954 --> 0:31:39.954
<v Speaker 2>performance artist on the New York or London where Harriot's from.

0:31:40.034 --> 0:31:43.994
<v Speaker 2>And then suddenly, my name is her body and it's

0:31:44.034 --> 0:31:46.834
<v Speaker 2>got nothing to do. He chose to put his penis.

0:31:46.874 --> 0:31:50.114
<v Speaker 1>Have you ever seen Holly this worked up about anything.

0:31:49.914 --> 0:31:56.834
<v Speaker 3>She doesn't understand art. I read this and went, I actually, reckon,

0:31:56.874 --> 0:31:59.234
<v Speaker 3>this is really clever. I think it's about the Madonna

0:31:59.354 --> 0:32:02.834
<v Speaker 3>ware dichotomy. Of course it is, And it's about how

0:32:03.394 --> 0:32:06.434
<v Speaker 3>the name of a mum for a man is sacred.

0:32:06.674 --> 0:32:09.314
<v Speaker 3>It's like she is permanent. She is the most important

0:32:09.354 --> 0:32:11.954
<v Speaker 3>person in their lives, but they don't see the woman

0:32:11.994 --> 0:32:15.154
<v Speaker 3>that they're having this transactional sex with where they walk

0:32:15.154 --> 0:32:16.834
<v Speaker 3>away and she's forgettable and blah blah blah.

0:32:17.394 --> 0:32:18.434
<v Speaker 2>Different species.

0:32:18.794 --> 0:32:22.074
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, but it's like a different species. And so she,

0:32:22.634 --> 0:32:24.754
<v Speaker 3>I think, is trying to make a statement by having

0:32:24.834 --> 0:32:28.394
<v Speaker 3>their names there. That's like, I am of the same stuff.

0:32:28.474 --> 0:32:31.274
<v Speaker 2>To find out the names of these men, some of

0:32:31.274 --> 0:32:32.954
<v Speaker 2>them she knew, like the ones she'd been related with.

0:32:33.074 --> 0:32:36.674
<v Speaker 2>She actually had a private investigator in London to go

0:32:36.754 --> 0:32:38.314
<v Speaker 2>and find two of them out, which she said she

0:32:38.354 --> 0:32:41.154
<v Speaker 2>found very satisfying because she didn't know them and she

0:32:41.234 --> 0:32:44.474
<v Speaker 2>wanted to be accurate because it was so important accurate.

0:32:44.594 --> 0:32:46.594
<v Speaker 1>I've been trying to figure out ever since you told

0:32:46.634 --> 0:32:50.154
<v Speaker 1>me about the story why it makes you so upset,

0:32:50.434 --> 0:32:53.114
<v Speaker 1>because you don't often get upset about things. You're very

0:32:53.154 --> 0:32:56.594
<v Speaker 1>sexually liberated, you are unmarried, So I'm like, what is

0:32:56.634 --> 0:32:58.594
<v Speaker 1>going on? Why is Holly so upset? And I think

0:32:58.594 --> 0:33:02.394
<v Speaker 1>it's because it's sort of a perfect parental storm because

0:33:02.394 --> 0:33:06.154
<v Speaker 1>it involves tattoos, which you're just worried about for your kids,

0:33:06.194 --> 0:33:07.394
<v Speaker 1>like are they going to go out and get a

0:33:07.434 --> 0:33:11.674
<v Speaker 1>tattoo one night? And it involves sleeping with people, and

0:33:11.714 --> 0:33:14.594
<v Speaker 1>it involves thinking about your children sleeping with people.

0:33:14.754 --> 0:33:19.154
<v Speaker 3>So it's just me, yes, yes, exactly.

0:33:18.914 --> 0:33:20.954
<v Speaker 2>Have anything to do with this, I reckon me. I

0:33:20.994 --> 0:33:23.634
<v Speaker 2>would love this. She would love it because she would

0:33:23.674 --> 0:33:26.994
<v Speaker 2>like to be involved. I don't mean that's actually that's weird, rabbit.

0:33:27.154 --> 0:33:28.314
<v Speaker 2>She likes to be involved.

0:33:28.354 --> 0:33:31.954
<v Speaker 3>Generally, she's got main character energy and she's like, I

0:33:31.954 --> 0:33:36.834
<v Speaker 3>would just like to be acknowledged. After the break the

0:33:36.874 --> 0:33:40.954
<v Speaker 3>deodorant you're meant to put literally everywhere smell maxing frag

0:33:40.994 --> 0:33:44.594
<v Speaker 3>heads perfumesta. Why is the culture so invested in us

0:33:44.594 --> 0:33:53.994
<v Speaker 3>smelling really really good frag heads smell maxing? Why is

0:33:54.034 --> 0:33:56.754
<v Speaker 3>smell the sense of the moment? First, I want to

0:33:56.754 --> 0:33:59.354
<v Speaker 3>tell you about a weird experience I had yesterday because

0:33:59.434 --> 0:34:02.834
<v Speaker 3>I got off the train and I was going up

0:34:02.994 --> 0:34:06.274
<v Speaker 3>the escalator and everyone around me was pointing and like

0:34:06.314 --> 0:34:08.834
<v Speaker 3>kind of commenting it this ad on the walls. It

0:34:08.913 --> 0:34:11.074
<v Speaker 3>was like we were entombed in an ad. It was

0:34:11.154 --> 0:34:13.754
<v Speaker 3>just everywhere, right, and it was a deodorant ad, but

0:34:13.873 --> 0:34:18.674
<v Speaker 3>there were pictures of bottoms and feet and the word

0:34:18.794 --> 0:34:22.873
<v Speaker 3>balls was written in really big light, just stamped there,

0:34:23.354 --> 0:34:27.234
<v Speaker 3>and it was about this neur Ez owner deodorant which

0:34:27.554 --> 0:34:32.194
<v Speaker 3>is meant to be used everywhere. It says stay fresh everywhere,

0:34:32.514 --> 0:34:36.354
<v Speaker 3>spray or is it both? There are both. So this

0:34:36.474 --> 0:34:38.994
<v Speaker 3>has been accompanied by a Martha Stewart ad where she

0:34:39.114 --> 0:34:42.514
<v Speaker 3>talks you through deodorizing your thighs. That's where she starts

0:34:42.554 --> 0:34:47.474
<v Speaker 3>matha feet, breasts, and then she clarifies that yes, you

0:34:47.514 --> 0:34:50.913
<v Speaker 3>can use it down under right, and the product might

0:34:50.954 --> 0:34:54.634
<v Speaker 3>be amazing. It's important to flag here that on our podcast,

0:34:54.834 --> 0:34:57.634
<v Speaker 3>well you will have heard as well as many doctors

0:34:57.874 --> 0:35:02.754
<v Speaker 3>say pH levels vagina, self cleaning before we go spraying,

0:35:03.114 --> 0:35:04.314
<v Speaker 3>putting things, maybe chucking.

0:35:04.354 --> 0:35:06.314
<v Speaker 2>It's like a self cleaning ovem.

0:35:06.394 --> 0:35:08.554
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, exactly right, it's a self cleaning up.

0:35:08.594 --> 0:35:10.473
<v Speaker 1>We're all oven self cleaning, by the way, because I've

0:35:10.474 --> 0:35:12.354
<v Speaker 1>never cleaned out, I've.

0:35:12.194 --> 0:35:14.114
<v Speaker 2>Never had a self cleaning of it, but I just

0:35:14.194 --> 0:35:18.634
<v Speaker 2>pretend that I do. This is similar or.

0:35:18.634 --> 0:35:20.954
<v Speaker 3>I'm interested in It's not how often you clean your ovens,

0:35:20.994 --> 0:35:25.354
<v Speaker 3>but the cultural obsession with smell so body lotions. The

0:35:25.434 --> 0:35:28.234
<v Speaker 3>global fragrance market is the biggest it has ever been

0:35:28.274 --> 0:35:34.154
<v Speaker 3>and still growing. Deodorant market skyrocketing. What is going on here, Amelia,

0:35:34.194 --> 0:35:34.714
<v Speaker 3>what do you reckon?

0:35:34.834 --> 0:35:38.034
<v Speaker 1>Well, as usual, it's gen Z's fault. Yeah, they are

0:35:38.194 --> 0:35:41.154
<v Speaker 1>obsessed with fragrance, and not in the way that Look

0:35:41.194 --> 0:35:43.994
<v Speaker 1>when I was growing up, which sprayed, our impulse body

0:35:43.994 --> 0:35:45.754
<v Speaker 1>spray and we got along with our days.

0:35:45.954 --> 0:35:47.114
<v Speaker 3>Did you have Britney Spears?

0:35:47.274 --> 0:35:48.794
<v Speaker 1>No, I had Spice Skills Limited Edition.

0:35:48.954 --> 0:35:49.914
<v Speaker 2>Oh.

0:35:49.994 --> 0:35:53.274
<v Speaker 1>The difference with gen Z is that they're into high

0:35:53.474 --> 0:35:57.674
<v Speaker 1>end fragrance. They're not just into the impulse And apparently

0:35:57.754 --> 0:36:01.274
<v Speaker 1>eighty three percent of gen Z wears fragrance as often

0:36:01.314 --> 0:36:04.754
<v Speaker 1>as three times a week. Fragrance, not impulse, body spray, fragrance.

0:36:05.194 --> 0:36:08.033
<v Speaker 1>They're taking that obsession with fragrance to a whole other level.

0:36:08.074 --> 0:36:10.873
<v Speaker 1>And this applies to both teenage boys, teenage girls, young men,

0:36:10.954 --> 0:36:15.554
<v Speaker 1>young women. And apparently TikTok is really key to what

0:36:15.754 --> 0:36:19.874
<v Speaker 1>happened here during the lockdown period of the pandemic. People

0:36:19.954 --> 0:36:24.154
<v Speaker 1>turn to TikTok for fragrance content. Now, Holly, you said

0:36:24.154 --> 0:36:25.674
<v Speaker 1>something interesting, which is, when you used to work in

0:36:25.714 --> 0:36:28.513
<v Speaker 1>women's magazines, this was a real dilemma for you.

0:36:28.674 --> 0:36:32.034
<v Speaker 2>So it's really interesting that fragrance has become so enormous

0:36:32.074 --> 0:36:34.794
<v Speaker 2>on social media because this might be news to the

0:36:34.914 --> 0:36:38.834
<v Speaker 2>gooners amongst us. But you can't smell social media. You

0:36:38.954 --> 0:36:42.274
<v Speaker 2>can't smell your phone. And the thing is is that

0:36:42.314 --> 0:36:44.314
<v Speaker 2>when I worked in women's mags, you were always having

0:36:44.314 --> 0:36:46.994
<v Speaker 2>to write fragrance stories because there are a lot of

0:36:46.994 --> 0:36:51.433
<v Speaker 2>fragrance advertisers and it is so hard to make them

0:36:51.474 --> 0:36:53.834
<v Speaker 2>a interesting or be described the smell.

0:36:53.874 --> 0:36:55.473
<v Speaker 3>It's like describing the taste of wine.

0:36:55.554 --> 0:36:58.274
<v Speaker 2>It is, and I still I don't get it, Like

0:36:58.634 --> 0:37:02.114
<v Speaker 2>I don't think I've ever seen I love perfume. I

0:37:02.194 --> 0:37:05.114
<v Speaker 2>love it. I've never seen an ad for it and thought, hmm,

0:37:05.234 --> 0:37:07.554
<v Speaker 2>because I'm like, I need to smell it, I need

0:37:07.594 --> 0:37:10.954
<v Speaker 2>an IRL experience. But that is not what this generation

0:37:11.074 --> 0:37:13.554
<v Speaker 2>is experiencing. Because you've already mentioned this, but boys have

0:37:13.634 --> 0:37:16.554
<v Speaker 2>been really leading this. A lot of parents of teenage

0:37:16.554 --> 0:37:20.274
<v Speaker 2>boys will say that they have a fragrance wardrobe, which

0:37:20.314 --> 0:37:23.154
<v Speaker 2>is not a thing that was happening. And they came

0:37:23.194 --> 0:37:26.674
<v Speaker 2>for our serums, these pesky children. They came for our serums,

0:37:26.714 --> 0:37:29.154
<v Speaker 2>and they came for our face masks, and they're coming

0:37:29.154 --> 0:37:30.234
<v Speaker 2>for our expensive sense.

0:37:30.354 --> 0:37:32.473
<v Speaker 1>And the experts do have a theory for this as

0:37:32.554 --> 0:37:35.873
<v Speaker 1>to why this started happening during COVID and also on TikTok,

0:37:35.954 --> 0:37:39.594
<v Speaker 1>and they say that it's about punctuating your day with

0:37:39.754 --> 0:37:43.754
<v Speaker 1>points of difference, because it's really hard these days to

0:37:43.874 --> 0:37:46.074
<v Speaker 1>tell what time of day it is because we're always

0:37:46.154 --> 0:37:48.714
<v Speaker 1>just looking at our phone screen. And so this theory

0:37:48.834 --> 0:37:52.114
<v Speaker 1>goes that people use fragrance to kind of tell themselves, Oh,

0:37:52.114 --> 0:37:54.674
<v Speaker 1>I'm going out to a party now, Oh I'm going

0:37:54.714 --> 0:37:57.154
<v Speaker 1>to work now, and they use the fragrance to sort

0:37:57.154 --> 0:37:58.393
<v Speaker 1>of delineate their day.

0:37:58.714 --> 0:38:00.794
<v Speaker 3>COVID. I remember one of the first things I did

0:38:00.914 --> 0:38:04.794
<v Speaker 3>was by really expensive fragrance candle, and it was about

0:38:05.274 --> 0:38:07.913
<v Speaker 3>into that a moment of jaw. And we've talked about

0:38:07.914 --> 0:38:11.393
<v Speaker 3>a lipstick effect before, which is that when cost of

0:38:11.434 --> 0:38:14.634
<v Speaker 3>living is high, you get little things that bring you joy.

0:38:14.794 --> 0:38:17.914
<v Speaker 3>What's interesting here is that this is a two hundred

0:38:17.914 --> 0:38:20.234
<v Speaker 3>and fifty dollars perfume. It is not unusual. And what

0:38:20.234 --> 0:38:23.234
<v Speaker 3>they're finding is that it's not parents just handing over money.

0:38:23.314 --> 0:38:26.154
<v Speaker 3>It is a lot of teenagers with their first job,

0:38:26.354 --> 0:38:29.634
<v Speaker 3>saving for months and months for presents.

0:38:29.794 --> 0:38:32.474
<v Speaker 1>So why do you think they love fragrance? Do you

0:38:32.474 --> 0:38:35.634
<v Speaker 1>think that theory of like defining times of day makes

0:38:35.634 --> 0:38:36.754
<v Speaker 1>sense or is it something else?

0:38:36.834 --> 0:38:40.314
<v Speaker 3>Yes, I think it's also about self expression and a

0:38:40.474 --> 0:38:44.354
<v Speaker 3>marker of identity. And I wonder if the other part

0:38:44.394 --> 0:38:48.834
<v Speaker 3>of the story is something to do with hygiene. So

0:38:49.714 --> 0:38:52.554
<v Speaker 3>we know that deodorant didn't even exist until like the

0:38:52.594 --> 0:38:55.114
<v Speaker 3>early twentieth century, and they say that body odor was

0:38:55.154 --> 0:38:57.433
<v Speaker 3>invented when they had a solution to it, right, so

0:38:57.514 --> 0:39:00.834
<v Speaker 3>our nose has actually changed what we could smell. Then

0:39:00.874 --> 0:39:04.993
<v Speaker 3>it was popularized kind of mid twentieth century. Then fragrances

0:39:04.994 --> 0:39:08.154
<v Speaker 3>have come in and now literally every lotion I care

0:39:08.314 --> 0:39:11.594
<v Speaker 3>so much what my washing powder smells like all that

0:39:11.674 --> 0:39:14.953
<v Speaker 3>kind of stuff, haircare. All of that is about our

0:39:15.034 --> 0:39:18.154
<v Speaker 3>our noses, like almost evolving to be more sensitive that

0:39:18.234 --> 0:39:21.594
<v Speaker 3>our standard for smell is skyrocketing. Because that's what I

0:39:21.594 --> 0:39:24.234
<v Speaker 3>thought when I looked at these ads, I went, Oh,

0:39:24.314 --> 0:39:27.274
<v Speaker 3>you're creating new problems, Like I didn't know that I

0:39:27.354 --> 0:39:30.594
<v Speaker 3>needed to deodorize my back. I didn't know there was

0:39:30.594 --> 0:39:31.393
<v Speaker 3>an issue there.

0:39:31.594 --> 0:39:34.553
<v Speaker 2>The unisex nature of this is interesting in that way too,

0:39:34.634 --> 0:39:38.473
<v Speaker 2>because famously it used to be that teenage boys were smelly, right,

0:39:38.514 --> 0:39:41.994
<v Speaker 2>that is the stereotype. Think about every stereotype of teenage

0:39:42.034 --> 0:39:44.994
<v Speaker 2>boys being smelly. Teenage boys bedrooms are smelly, their clothes

0:39:44.994 --> 0:39:47.514
<v Speaker 2>are smelly, their shoes are smelly. And I think that

0:39:47.674 --> 0:39:50.354
<v Speaker 2>maybe the marketing, in the same way that they've been

0:39:50.354 --> 0:39:53.074
<v Speaker 2>making women feel kind of disgusted by themselves and their

0:39:53.074 --> 0:39:56.393
<v Speaker 2>own natural bodily secretions for a long time now, we've

0:39:56.394 --> 0:39:59.874
<v Speaker 2>managed to also convince the boys of that. We've democratized

0:39:59.914 --> 0:40:02.913
<v Speaker 2>and spread out the disgust involved there, which is not

0:40:02.994 --> 0:40:06.433
<v Speaker 2>a bad thing necessarily, because there was some truth to

0:40:06.474 --> 0:40:10.913
<v Speaker 2>the fact that boys were smelly. But what's also interesting

0:40:11.074 --> 0:40:14.794
<v Speaker 2>is that as the fragrance of everything has climbed. There's

0:40:14.834 --> 0:40:19.634
<v Speaker 2>also like a status involved in rejecting it. I've had

0:40:19.674 --> 0:40:23.474
<v Speaker 2>before people arranging to come into a podcast interview request

0:40:23.554 --> 0:40:26.234
<v Speaker 2>that I wear no perfume and that the producer wears

0:40:26.274 --> 0:40:28.194
<v Speaker 2>no perfume, and that no one they'll have anything to

0:40:28.234 --> 0:40:31.314
<v Speaker 2>do with has any artificial sense on them, because it's

0:40:31.354 --> 0:40:33.913
<v Speaker 2>become kind of well, for a start, we know that

0:40:34.314 --> 0:40:37.873
<v Speaker 2>as your hormone shift, your reactions to smells can and

0:40:37.914 --> 0:40:40.754
<v Speaker 2>some people have migraines that are triggered by artificial sense,

0:40:40.794 --> 0:40:42.913
<v Speaker 2>they have certain allergies. They could say that they can

0:40:42.994 --> 0:40:46.474
<v Speaker 2>cause some kind of hormonal imbalances. The sort of people

0:40:46.514 --> 0:40:50.354
<v Speaker 2>who are very into clean beauty and clean everything are

0:40:50.394 --> 0:40:53.474
<v Speaker 2>obsessed with no fragrance. So it's almost like there's a

0:40:53.514 --> 0:40:57.594
<v Speaker 2>status in rejecting the fact that now everybody smells of

0:40:57.714 --> 0:40:58.634
<v Speaker 2>artificial fragrance.

0:40:58.714 --> 0:41:01.594
<v Speaker 1>But also another interesting fact on that is that one

0:41:01.634 --> 0:41:06.354
<v Speaker 1>of our producers told us that in menopause, your senses

0:41:06.394 --> 0:41:11.274
<v Speaker 1>smell high, and you are interviewing people for me sometimes

0:41:11.354 --> 0:41:14.914
<v Speaker 1>and maybe these are literally women who are finding sense

0:41:15.194 --> 0:41:16.354
<v Speaker 1>increasingly unbearable.

0:41:16.434 --> 0:41:19.034
<v Speaker 2>I think also it's people who might have autoimmunitions. Is

0:41:19.114 --> 0:41:22.354
<v Speaker 2>like there's a lot of people for whom scent is

0:41:22.554 --> 0:41:26.594
<v Speaker 2>very triggering, and also I think there's a way that

0:41:26.674 --> 0:41:29.274
<v Speaker 2>it also exerts a bit of control. I'm not saying

0:41:29.314 --> 0:41:31.314
<v Speaker 2>that about my own personal experience with people who've made

0:41:31.314 --> 0:41:34.194
<v Speaker 2>those requests, but it's almost exerting a bit of control

0:41:34.234 --> 0:41:37.634
<v Speaker 2>around your environment to control how it smells. Because smells

0:41:37.674 --> 0:41:40.393
<v Speaker 2>are triggering in some ways hormonally and health wise, but

0:41:40.434 --> 0:41:42.394
<v Speaker 2>they're also emotionally very triggering.

0:41:42.474 --> 0:41:42.634
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:41:42.674 --> 0:41:46.914
<v Speaker 2>We all know how intensely we feel about smelling a perfume.

0:41:46.514 --> 0:41:48.073
<v Speaker 3>That associates with a memory.

0:41:48.434 --> 0:41:51.034
<v Speaker 2>He associates with a memory someone you loved, someone you dated,

0:41:51.074 --> 0:41:54.314
<v Speaker 2>someone you've lost, and how it can transport you. So

0:41:54.754 --> 0:41:58.154
<v Speaker 2>if we're living in this highly fragranced world that you're describing, Jesse,

0:41:58.354 --> 0:42:01.114
<v Speaker 2>it's like we're being assaulted all the time by things

0:42:01.114 --> 0:42:03.114
<v Speaker 2>we can't control. So I think there's a measure of

0:42:03.194 --> 0:42:07.674
<v Speaker 2>like almost status around being able to reject that everything's

0:42:07.714 --> 0:42:09.513
<v Speaker 2>fragrance free. And I don't want any of.

0:42:09.434 --> 0:42:11.594
<v Speaker 3>That in my world, yes, but I also think that

0:42:11.674 --> 0:42:15.554
<v Speaker 3>the market is onto that. So the market is very

0:42:15.674 --> 0:42:17.634
<v Speaker 3>much I have had this when I was in my

0:42:17.674 --> 0:42:19.314
<v Speaker 3>early twenties, and I wondered if it was a life

0:42:19.314 --> 0:42:22.473
<v Speaker 3>stage thing, especially when you're going out, you're going on dates.

0:42:22.514 --> 0:42:27.154
<v Speaker 3>There's something very fun about the fragrance experience and working

0:42:27.154 --> 0:42:29.554
<v Speaker 3>out who you are. And I loved. That's what I

0:42:29.554 --> 0:42:33.194
<v Speaker 3>would spend. I would never buy design or anything except perfume.

0:42:33.274 --> 0:42:36.274
<v Speaker 3>Like I was obsessed, what was your favorite. I really

0:42:36.674 --> 0:42:40.714
<v Speaker 3>liked misty Or, which was quite a like a Florally one.

0:42:40.794 --> 0:42:43.194
<v Speaker 3>I had a Chanel one. Yes, Natalie Popmanway.

0:42:43.194 --> 0:42:46.234
<v Speaker 2>I used to Wemyaki and oh there's a whole era

0:42:46.354 --> 0:42:48.714
<v Speaker 2>of my life. Yeah, I lived the little Animac and

0:42:48.714 --> 0:42:51.034
<v Speaker 2>smell it. I can put myself exactly in that.

0:42:51.034 --> 0:42:53.474
<v Speaker 3>Space, exactly and now they sit there and I can't

0:42:53.514 --> 0:42:57.154
<v Speaker 3>pregnancy change that for me. I cannot. It actually changed

0:42:57.194 --> 0:42:59.714
<v Speaker 3>how every single thing smells. And so I went to

0:43:00.234 --> 0:43:02.393
<v Speaker 3>Esop the other day because I have been told that

0:43:02.434 --> 0:43:03.913
<v Speaker 3>they're not hormonally disruptive.

0:43:03.954 --> 0:43:04.393
<v Speaker 1>I don't know.

0:43:04.474 --> 0:43:06.834
<v Speaker 3>I'm not a doctor status, I don't know any of this.

0:43:06.954 --> 0:43:10.954
<v Speaker 3>But the details of the descriptions of that perfume and

0:43:10.994 --> 0:43:14.393
<v Speaker 3>the way it's sold is it won't assault people as

0:43:14.394 --> 0:43:17.674
<v Speaker 3>you walk past. It's your natural smell amplify.

0:43:18.074 --> 0:43:21.834
<v Speaker 1>The best smelling person I ever met was the Melbourne

0:43:21.954 --> 0:43:24.674
<v Speaker 1>based founder of Esop He was a man I met

0:43:24.714 --> 0:43:27.514
<v Speaker 1>through work who I was interviewing, and I will always

0:43:27.554 --> 0:43:30.314
<v Speaker 1>remember that his breath smelled like Lily's.

0:43:32.114 --> 0:43:33.794
<v Speaker 3>Do they sell that product? I want that product.

0:43:33.914 --> 0:43:37.194
<v Speaker 2>Gosh, a massive thank you. Out Loud is that's all

0:43:37.194 --> 0:43:39.314
<v Speaker 2>we've got time for. On today's show. Remember you can

0:43:39.314 --> 0:43:42.314
<v Speaker 2>watch us on YouTube if you want to see a crininess.

0:43:42.354 --> 0:43:46.314
<v Speaker 2>We discuss some of the things we discussed today if

0:43:46.314 --> 0:43:48.954
<v Speaker 2>you're looking for something else to listen to. On yesterday's

0:43:48.954 --> 0:43:53.154
<v Speaker 2>subscriber episode, we discussed the fallout from Prince Andrew's banishment

0:43:53.394 --> 0:43:55.914
<v Speaker 2>and what it could mean for Prince Harry if Prince

0:43:55.954 --> 0:43:57.794
<v Speaker 2>William decides to follow suit.

0:43:58.234 --> 0:44:01.114
<v Speaker 1>Okay, if you love out Loud, we also have a

0:44:01.194 --> 0:44:03.274
<v Speaker 1>sister show that I would love for you to come

0:44:03.274 --> 0:44:05.834
<v Speaker 1>and have a listen to. It's called Parenting out Loud.

0:44:05.914 --> 0:44:08.794
<v Speaker 1>It's where we bring you the week in parenting pop culture.

0:44:09.474 --> 0:44:12.354
<v Speaker 1>This week, Kiera Knightley bought one of our hosts to

0:44:12.514 --> 0:44:16.194
<v Speaker 1>tears talking about something that hit way too close to home.

0:44:16.754 --> 0:44:18.873
<v Speaker 1>And if your school group chats are heating up at

0:44:18.874 --> 0:44:22.034
<v Speaker 1>the end of the year, I have some controversial ground

0:44:22.154 --> 0:44:25.674
<v Speaker 1>rules for you. It's the same smart, interesting chat you

0:44:25.714 --> 0:44:29.314
<v Speaker 1>get here, just parenting, coded search, parenting out Loud, and

0:44:29.434 --> 0:44:29.994
<v Speaker 1>hip follow.

0:44:30.194 --> 0:44:32.754
<v Speaker 2>You'll love it massive. Thank you also to our fabulous

0:44:32.754 --> 0:44:34.594
<v Speaker 2>team fail being has put this show together. We're going

0:44:34.674 --> 0:44:35.954
<v Speaker 2>to be back in your ears tomorrow.

0:44:36.394 --> 0:44:41.114
<v Speaker 3>Bye, Momma.

0:44:41.194 --> 0:44:44.194
<v Speaker 2>Mia acknowledges the traditional owners of the land on which

0:44:44.234 --> 0:44:45.754
<v Speaker 2>we've recorded this podcast.