WEBVTT - The Divorce Rumour About Emily Blunt and John Krasinski [throw back]

0:00:11.189 --> 0:00:13.909
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to a MoMA Mia podcast.

0:00:14.829 --> 0:00:17.909
<v Speaker 2>Mom and Maya acknowledges the traditional owners of land and

0:00:17.949 --> 0:00:30.629
<v Speaker 2>waters that this podcast is recorded on Hello and welcome

0:00:30.749 --> 0:00:34.789
<v Speaker 2>to Canceled, The Lazy Girl's Guide to bizarre celebrity cancelations.

0:00:35.229 --> 0:00:38.149
<v Speaker 2>We've been in your ears all summer long because we

0:00:38.189 --> 0:00:41.709
<v Speaker 2>are putting on something called a hot pod summer. Seriously,

0:00:42.109 --> 0:00:45.109
<v Speaker 2>you how sweaty my hand is. Over the next three weeks,

0:00:45.149 --> 0:00:47.549
<v Speaker 2>you'll be able to listen to us three times a week.

0:00:47.629 --> 0:00:49.749
<v Speaker 2>And on top of that, all podcasts at Mum Maya

0:00:49.949 --> 0:00:52.469
<v Speaker 2>will have brand new episodes dropping about the topics that

0:00:52.509 --> 0:00:55.829
<v Speaker 2>we couldn't stop talking about this year, all curated especially

0:00:55.869 --> 0:00:59.629
<v Speaker 2>for you across this holiday period. But first, we have

0:00:59.669 --> 0:01:01.069
<v Speaker 2>one thing for you lazy girls to do.

0:01:01.269 --> 0:01:02.309
<v Speaker 1>One action point.

0:01:02.429 --> 0:01:05.069
<v Speaker 2>Whatever you do, make sure you're subscribed canceled in your

0:01:05.069 --> 0:01:08.469
<v Speaker 2>favorite podcast app so you never miss an episode. We

0:01:08.589 --> 0:01:11.749
<v Speaker 2>also know that you're feeling particularly lazy right now because

0:01:11.789 --> 0:01:13.709
<v Speaker 2>it's holidays, you're not meant to have to do anything.

0:01:14.229 --> 0:01:15.869
<v Speaker 2>And if you're not on holidays, which a lot of

0:01:15.909 --> 0:01:18.269
<v Speaker 2>you won't be because you keep the country running with

0:01:18.389 --> 0:01:21.389
<v Speaker 2>important work while us lazy girls have a lie down.

0:01:21.749 --> 0:01:24.549
<v Speaker 2>We know you need things to be simple and easy,

0:01:24.869 --> 0:01:27.989
<v Speaker 2>So we're giving you some of our favorite moments from

0:01:28.029 --> 0:01:32.589
<v Speaker 2>Canceled this year. Today, we need to talk about Emily

0:01:32.869 --> 0:01:36.629
<v Speaker 2>Blunt and specifically those divorce rumors about her and her

0:01:36.709 --> 0:01:40.309
<v Speaker 2>husband John Krasinski aka Jim from the Office aka her

0:01:40.349 --> 0:01:43.229
<v Speaker 2>husband in a quiet place, which we both have issues with,

0:01:43.509 --> 0:01:46.069
<v Speaker 2>issues that have been previously discussed. If you want to

0:01:46.109 --> 0:01:48.309
<v Speaker 2>listen to that whole episode. Is it a crime to

0:01:48.349 --> 0:01:50.869
<v Speaker 2>gossip with your husband on the red carpet and not

0:01:50.989 --> 0:01:52.269
<v Speaker 2>let the rest of us in on it?

0:01:52.469 --> 0:01:53.789
<v Speaker 1>Yes, you decide.

0:01:53.869 --> 0:01:56.269
<v Speaker 2>This is a moment from our big episode on Emily

0:01:56.309 --> 0:02:02.629
<v Speaker 2>Blunt Jesse uncomfortable red carpet footage. This was my personal

0:02:02.749 --> 0:02:07.109
<v Speaker 2>favorite thing that literally ever happened. In January of this year,

0:02:07.349 --> 0:02:12.029
<v Speaker 2>Emily Blunt and her husband John Sinsky of the Office theme,

0:02:12.629 --> 0:02:15.909
<v Speaker 2>walked the red carpet at the Golden Globes. A video

0:02:16.069 --> 0:02:18.589
<v Speaker 2>was taken of the two of them while they posed

0:02:18.589 --> 0:02:21.749
<v Speaker 2>for photos and they were speaking to each other. What

0:02:21.829 --> 0:02:24.429
<v Speaker 2>they said couldn't be heard, but according to a lot

0:02:24.429 --> 0:02:27.989
<v Speaker 2>of people on the internet, it could be lip red. Jesse,

0:02:28.229 --> 0:02:30.429
<v Speaker 2>did you come across this? I did, but I think

0:02:30.469 --> 0:02:32.509
<v Speaker 2>that all the lip reading things I watched were joking.

0:02:33.069 --> 0:02:34.909
<v Speaker 2>I can't tell if they're joking or not. And I

0:02:34.949 --> 0:02:36.709
<v Speaker 2>get confused because you can put anything over the top,

0:02:36.709 --> 0:02:39.749
<v Speaker 2>and I believe that's Yeah, that's the thing about lip reading.

0:02:40.029 --> 0:02:41.909
<v Speaker 2>I don't know enough to challenge. And it's like, I'm

0:02:41.909 --> 0:02:43.589
<v Speaker 2>a lip reading expert, and I'm like, I don't think

0:02:43.629 --> 0:02:46.109
<v Speaker 2>that's a job. Yeah, No, A lot of people are.

0:02:46.189 --> 0:02:48.909
<v Speaker 2>I'm a body language expert. I'm a lip reading the

0:02:48.909 --> 0:02:50.549
<v Speaker 2>one that I get. I get someone on TikTok who

0:02:50.549 --> 0:02:52.789
<v Speaker 2>says I'm deaf. Here's what they were saying. I'm like,

0:02:52.869 --> 0:02:56.389
<v Speaker 2>I love that trust because you have been lip reading, yeah,

0:02:56.429 --> 0:02:57.949
<v Speaker 2>for a long time, and you've got to be good

0:02:57.949 --> 0:03:01.669
<v Speaker 2>at it, lots of experience. Jess, you're not a professional

0:03:01.709 --> 0:03:04.589
<v Speaker 2>lip reader, I'm not. But do you use sense tension

0:03:04.669 --> 0:03:16.629
<v Speaker 2>in this clip right now? Maybe at the very end.

0:03:16.829 --> 0:03:18.509
<v Speaker 2>I wouldn't have thought anything of it if you didn't

0:03:18.509 --> 0:03:20.469
<v Speaker 2>ask me if I sensed any tension in that clip.

0:03:20.589 --> 0:03:23.469
<v Speaker 2>I think it's a pretty innocuous clip. Well, people are

0:03:23.509 --> 0:03:27.749
<v Speaker 2>convinced that. In that video, Krazinsky says I can't wait

0:03:27.829 --> 0:03:31.829
<v Speaker 2>to divorce, and Emily Blunt says hey, and he says,

0:03:32.069 --> 0:03:33.749
<v Speaker 2>I'm serious.

0:03:33.829 --> 0:03:36.269
<v Speaker 1>Just didn't happen. That just didn't happen.

0:03:36.389 --> 0:03:39.109
<v Speaker 2>So comment sections went off with people weighing in.

0:03:40.349 --> 0:03:41.229
<v Speaker 1>It didn't happen.

0:03:42.309 --> 0:03:46.349
<v Speaker 2>If you were Emily Blunt and you've been famous since

0:03:46.429 --> 0:03:49.989
<v Speaker 2>Merrill said you are really good and better than Anne Hathaway,

0:03:50.229 --> 0:03:53.549
<v Speaker 2>would you stand on a red carp in twenty twenty

0:03:53.549 --> 0:03:58.429
<v Speaker 2>four and talk about your divorce one meter from a microphone.

0:03:58.509 --> 0:04:00.229
<v Speaker 1>Here's the thing, Yes.

0:04:01.189 --> 0:04:05.109
<v Speaker 2>Why, This is why, because even celebrities have petty bites,

0:04:05.389 --> 0:04:10.349
<v Speaker 2>and even celebrities are just those couples who are doing

0:04:10.429 --> 0:04:13.469
<v Speaker 2>about something. Oh I agree, do I have petty fights

0:04:13.509 --> 0:04:15.189
<v Speaker 2>all the time, But when I go out to a

0:04:15.229 --> 0:04:19.549
<v Speaker 2>dinner party, I don't start going like starting ship in

0:04:19.549 --> 0:04:21.909
<v Speaker 2>front of everyone because it would be embarrassing.

0:04:21.989 --> 0:04:22.309
<v Speaker 1>Okay.

0:04:22.389 --> 0:04:25.429
<v Speaker 2>A good point is they're both actors, okay, and if

0:04:25.429 --> 0:04:28.589
<v Speaker 2>something wasn't going right, click act.

0:04:28.389 --> 0:04:31.109
<v Speaker 1>During the quiet place, act to your Jim, Yeah.

0:04:30.989 --> 0:04:34.909
<v Speaker 2>From the office, act we love each other, come on

0:04:34.989 --> 0:04:35.549
<v Speaker 2>when we don't?

0:04:35.709 --> 0:04:36.629
<v Speaker 1>Yeah to go method.

0:04:45.909 --> 0:04:49.949
<v Speaker 2>Some other theories about what was said. Do they even

0:04:50.109 --> 0:04:53.109
<v Speaker 2>say anything? Yeah, okay, they were talking. I've watched it

0:04:53.149 --> 0:04:55.669
<v Speaker 2>so many times that there are clear like movements of

0:04:55.709 --> 0:04:57.789
<v Speaker 2>their mouths. So what do you think they said, okay,

0:04:57.829 --> 0:05:01.069
<v Speaker 2>Well here's some other theorists. So just as a reminder,

0:05:01.749 --> 0:05:08.509
<v Speaker 2>it's I can't wait to divorce. I'm furious, alleged. The

0:05:08.589 --> 0:05:11.669
<v Speaker 2>other theory is it he said I can't wait to

0:05:11.669 --> 0:05:16.629
<v Speaker 2>get indoors because it was windy. It was really windy.

0:05:17.709 --> 0:05:20.629
<v Speaker 2>I'm like, yeah, that sounds right. Another theory was I

0:05:20.669 --> 0:05:26.429
<v Speaker 2>can't wait for the orders or I can't wait for

0:05:26.469 --> 0:05:29.549
<v Speaker 2>the awards, which also makes.

0:05:29.349 --> 0:05:31.389
<v Speaker 1>Sense given the second.

0:05:31.469 --> 0:05:34.989
<v Speaker 2>Given the context out of ABC or D, I would

0:05:34.989 --> 0:05:35.949
<v Speaker 2>go BC or D.

0:05:36.669 --> 0:05:36.989
<v Speaker 1>Likely.

0:05:37.269 --> 0:05:40.389
<v Speaker 2>One lip reader insists that the conversation went like this.

0:05:40.989 --> 0:05:44.829
<v Speaker 2>Emily simply says, it's chilly here, right, which prompts John

0:05:44.869 --> 0:05:49.509
<v Speaker 2>to reply, can't wait to wear indoors it's windy. Yay.

0:05:49.989 --> 0:05:53.029
<v Speaker 2>I think highly more likely than he said can't wait

0:05:53.069 --> 0:05:59.709
<v Speaker 2>to divorce you. Yeah, bitch, here's my challenge to that.

0:05:59.869 --> 0:06:03.069
<v Speaker 2>And this is important. No, Klevinski is in a suit.

0:06:03.669 --> 0:06:06.629
<v Speaker 2>If it's cold and you're in a suit, you shouldn't

0:06:06.669 --> 0:06:09.669
<v Speaker 2>be that cold. But wasn't it her saying it was windy?

0:06:10.109 --> 0:06:12.109
<v Speaker 2>Didn't she start the conversa? He said, can't wait to

0:06:12.149 --> 0:06:14.429
<v Speaker 2>get indoors. You can still want to be indoors even

0:06:14.429 --> 0:06:15.269
<v Speaker 2>if you're in a suit.

0:06:15.309 --> 0:06:15.869
<v Speaker 1>I don't know.

0:06:16.509 --> 0:06:18.389
<v Speaker 2>I don't because it could be messing up your hair.

0:06:19.389 --> 0:06:24.069
<v Speaker 2>His hair seemed well sprayed either way. If they were

0:06:24.109 --> 0:06:26.709
<v Speaker 2>having a public fight on the road carpet, I am

0:06:26.749 --> 0:06:29.149
<v Speaker 2>all for it. It's the kind of thing I would do,

0:06:29.509 --> 0:06:31.829
<v Speaker 2>we would do. Can you imagine if you and I

0:06:31.869 --> 0:06:35.109
<v Speaker 2>would Yeah? And they would like, it's a dirty slot.

0:06:35.389 --> 0:06:38.189
<v Speaker 2>They would say, did she just call her a doper? No?

0:06:38.509 --> 0:06:41.469
<v Speaker 1>She really no, No, you did the last one.

0:06:41.709 --> 0:06:44.909
<v Speaker 2>No that you're making me look ugly, stopping, it's not

0:06:44.949 --> 0:06:48.309
<v Speaker 2>my side, et cetera, et cetera. In a response, a

0:06:48.389 --> 0:06:51.269
<v Speaker 2>source told US Weekly, there are no issues with Emily

0:06:51.309 --> 0:06:55.149
<v Speaker 2>and John. They are absolutely not talking about divorce, talking

0:06:55.229 --> 0:06:59.669
<v Speaker 2>about indoors. Well, they didn't actually say, well, I'm actually

0:06:59.789 --> 0:07:03.229
<v Speaker 2>saying it's not I would like them to correct the record.

0:07:03.549 --> 0:07:06.349
<v Speaker 2>They also claimed that the couple were laughing the whole

0:07:06.349 --> 0:07:11.069
<v Speaker 2>thing off. Now this annoys me when they're rumors, When

0:07:11.069 --> 0:07:15.069
<v Speaker 2>there are rumors and gossip and the couple's laughing about it,

0:07:15.189 --> 0:07:16.029
<v Speaker 2>I don't think you're laughing.

0:07:16.149 --> 0:07:17.069
<v Speaker 1>I think you're pissed off.

0:07:17.349 --> 0:07:18.909
<v Speaker 2>Why don't I think you're pissed off? Because I think

0:07:18.949 --> 0:07:23.389
<v Speaker 2>if you commented on every time a fake Libreta said,

0:07:23.389 --> 0:07:25.589
<v Speaker 2>you're talking about divorce. All you do is comment you'd

0:07:25.589 --> 0:07:26.909
<v Speaker 2>never make a quiet place.

0:07:26.669 --> 0:07:31.269
<v Speaker 1>Three, You never would. True, they're busy. They're busy, but

0:07:31.389 --> 0:07:32.869
<v Speaker 1>they're artists. They're busy.

0:07:33.029 --> 0:07:34.869
<v Speaker 2>I think they were annoyed that everyone thought they were

0:07:34.869 --> 0:07:37.509
<v Speaker 2>getting divorced. I think they minded, but I also think

0:07:37.949 --> 0:07:41.989
<v Speaker 2>I hate wind. They would hate wind. Wind makes everyone cranky,

0:07:42.109 --> 0:07:43.909
<v Speaker 2>does which also plays in my theory that they were

0:07:43.909 --> 0:07:46.349
<v Speaker 2>talking about divorce because the wind was making the main

0:07:46.429 --> 0:07:49.829
<v Speaker 2>wind ends relationship. Our parents are school teachers, as there

0:07:49.829 --> 0:07:52.669
<v Speaker 2>are brothers. They say kids never paved worse than the window.

0:07:53.629 --> 0:07:54.389
<v Speaker 1>A windy day.

0:07:54.909 --> 0:07:59.989
<v Speaker 2>Everyone loses the songs in my eye. To listen to

0:08:00.029 --> 0:08:04.669
<v Speaker 2>that entire episode titled Emily, Wait, did you say divorce? Blunt,

0:08:05.109 --> 0:08:08.229
<v Speaker 2>just click the link in our show notes. Other charges

0:08:08.269 --> 0:08:10.789
<v Speaker 2>include the fact that as a British person, she's taking

0:08:10.909 --> 0:08:13.949
<v Speaker 2>jobs from hard working Americans, starring in too many quiet

0:08:13.949 --> 0:08:16.629
<v Speaker 2>place movies, and the fact she made a fat phobic

0:08:16.669 --> 0:08:20.309
<v Speaker 2>comment twelve years ago, which she has since sincerely apologized for.

0:08:20.989 --> 0:08:23.829
<v Speaker 2>This episode is petty, but that's what the canceled courtroom

0:08:23.989 --> 0:08:26.469
<v Speaker 2>is all about. You can listen in full via the

0:08:26.509 --> 0:08:30.109
<v Speaker 2>link in our show notes. We're recanceling three things every

0:08:30.149 --> 0:08:34.029
<v Speaker 2>week over the summer break, including celebrities, TV shows, celebrity couples,

0:08:34.109 --> 0:08:37.349
<v Speaker 2>and press tours because we need to keep the investigations running.

0:08:37.709 --> 0:08:40.189
<v Speaker 2>You can find videos from the podcast and evidence of

0:08:40.229 --> 0:08:44.109
<v Speaker 2>the celebrity crimes on our Instagram at the Twins Underscore Thoughts,

0:08:44.269 --> 0:08:52.349
<v Speaker 2>or on TikTok At canceled the podcast, Bye Bye