WEBVTT - Meet The Anonymous Host Of Casefile

0:00:11.542 --> 0:00:16.142
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to a MoMA Mea podcast. Mama Mea acknowledges

0:00:16.222 --> 0:00:19.662
<v Speaker 1>the traditional owners of land and waders. This podcast was

0:00:19.702 --> 0:00:24.942
<v Speaker 1>recorded on to some he's known as the anonymous host.

0:00:26.022 --> 0:00:31.302
<v Speaker 1>Others have nicknamed him Casey. If you're listening to this podcast.

0:00:31.262 --> 0:00:34.862
<v Speaker 2>And you're a fan of true crime, you'll probably recognize

0:00:34.862 --> 0:00:35.382
<v Speaker 2>this voice.

0:00:35.502 --> 0:00:38.342
<v Speaker 3>Asking's indicating they'd applied the patches in the lead up

0:00:38.422 --> 0:00:42.822
<v Speaker 3>to their deaths Stranger Still, the evidence suggests that the

0:00:42.862 --> 0:00:44.182
<v Speaker 3>couple had ingested, but.

0:00:44.182 --> 0:00:47.262
<v Speaker 2>The host of Australian true crime podcast case File has

0:00:47.342 --> 0:00:51.862
<v Speaker 2>kept his identity secret for nine years and so far that's.

0:00:51.582 --> 0:00:53.262
<v Speaker 4>Been working pretty well for him.

0:00:53.702 --> 0:00:55.982
<v Speaker 2>Casey might not let us tell you his real name,

0:00:56.902 --> 0:01:08.462
<v Speaker 2>but that doesn't mean we can't tell you his story.

0:01:08.902 --> 0:01:12.382
<v Speaker 2>I'm Jemma Bass and this is True Crime Conversations amom

0:01:12.382 --> 0:01:15.702
<v Speaker 2>of Me, a podcast exploring the world's most notorious crimes

0:01:16.102 --> 0:01:18.942
<v Speaker 2>by speaking to the people who know the most about them.

0:01:19.382 --> 0:01:22.102
<v Speaker 2>We've got a bit of a different episode for you today.

0:01:22.862 --> 0:01:25.422
<v Speaker 2>Case File is what you would call one of our

0:01:25.862 --> 0:01:29.622
<v Speaker 2>direct competitors. We both work in the Australian true crime

0:01:29.662 --> 0:01:32.742
<v Speaker 2>podcasting space and we're regularly up against them in the

0:01:32.822 --> 0:01:39.222
<v Speaker 2>various podcasting charts. They're wildly popular, often number one, with

0:01:39.302 --> 0:01:42.542
<v Speaker 2>people all over the world attracted to the podcast's distinct,

0:01:42.822 --> 0:01:47.142
<v Speaker 2>no frills approach to storytelling. It all started with one

0:01:47.382 --> 0:01:51.622
<v Speaker 2>typical Aussie bloke as he calls himself in his spare room,

0:01:51.742 --> 0:01:54.582
<v Speaker 2>deciding to give podcasting a go while recovering from a

0:01:54.622 --> 0:01:58.982
<v Speaker 2>sporting injury. Now the anonymous host and his team are

0:01:58.982 --> 0:02:02.302
<v Speaker 2>in the years of more than eight hundred thousand people

0:02:02.502 --> 0:02:07.862
<v Speaker 2>every month. He doesn't really do interviews, you'll only find

0:02:07.902 --> 0:02:10.422
<v Speaker 2>one or two on the internet, but we managed to

0:02:10.462 --> 0:02:13.302
<v Speaker 2>convinced him to come into Momma mea HQ for an

0:02:13.302 --> 0:02:17.702
<v Speaker 2>exclusive sit down chat. I don't know what I was

0:02:18.302 --> 0:02:21.382
<v Speaker 2>meeting him in real life. He wasn't not what I

0:02:21.422 --> 0:02:25.462
<v Speaker 2>was expecting. Probably more clean cut than the descriptor he

0:02:25.502 --> 0:02:28.142
<v Speaker 2>gives of being a typical Aussie bloke, but maybe that's

0:02:28.222 --> 0:02:32.302
<v Speaker 2>just me being too stereotypical. The feedback from my colleagues

0:02:32.302 --> 0:02:35.382
<v Speaker 2>who sneak to peak is that he's younger than they imagined.

0:02:35.542 --> 0:02:36.862
<v Speaker 4>Make of that what you will.

0:02:37.782 --> 0:02:41.182
<v Speaker 2>And when I say sneak to peak, several of my

0:02:41.302 --> 0:02:45.742
<v Speaker 2>colleagues not only hobbed, but chased this man down the

0:02:45.782 --> 0:02:49.502
<v Speaker 2>halls of our office. Honestly, there was more excitement in

0:02:49.542 --> 0:02:53.542
<v Speaker 2>here than when we have some Hollywood celebs grace our halls.

0:02:54.622 --> 0:02:58.022
<v Speaker 2>Please enjoy my chat with the anonymous host of case File.

0:02:59.862 --> 0:03:02.582
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to start with some quick fire questions, getting

0:03:02.582 --> 0:03:03.622
<v Speaker 2>to know you questions.

0:03:03.902 --> 0:03:06.782
<v Speaker 4>I will accept no comment if I have to.

0:03:07.262 --> 0:03:12.942
<v Speaker 3>Okay, sounds good, favorite sport, Rugby league, favorite food.

0:03:14.982 --> 0:03:15.182
<v Speaker 5>Toy.

0:03:15.382 --> 0:03:16.982
<v Speaker 4>That was a toughie. You had to think about that.

0:03:17.102 --> 0:03:19.222
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, it was Indian maybe.

0:03:19.462 --> 0:03:21.262
<v Speaker 4>Favorite song and or artists.

0:03:22.222 --> 0:03:27.342
<v Speaker 3>Favorite song Flowers and You by touche A Moore, very specific.

0:03:27.822 --> 0:03:30.422
<v Speaker 3>It's getting quite the play at the moment. It's not new,

0:03:30.462 --> 0:03:33.022
<v Speaker 3>it's actually probably ten years old now. But good song.

0:03:33.942 --> 0:03:38.742
<v Speaker 2>Favorite thing to do on the weekend, golf, favorite place

0:03:38.822 --> 0:03:44.422
<v Speaker 2>in Australia, Blue Mountains, m TV.

0:03:44.262 --> 0:03:49.942
<v Speaker 3>Show cobra Qui what Yeah, just because it's so tacky

0:03:50.182 --> 0:03:54.422
<v Speaker 3>and cheesy, but they really lean into it. And I

0:03:54.502 --> 0:03:56.062
<v Speaker 3>was a fan of the Karate Kid movies when I

0:03:56.102 --> 0:03:58.582
<v Speaker 3>was young, so it's a bit of a nostalgia thing.

0:03:58.742 --> 0:04:00.822
<v Speaker 5>It's like it's bad, but it's good bad.

0:04:01.942 --> 0:04:04.382
<v Speaker 4>If you could have dinner with anyone alive or dead,

0:04:04.502 --> 0:04:05.142
<v Speaker 4>who would it be?

0:04:06.502 --> 0:04:13.622
<v Speaker 6>Kirk Cabaine Ooh, I'm hearing a music yeah, big music fan. Yeah, well,

0:04:13.862 --> 0:04:18.782
<v Speaker 6>or actually Kirk Cobaine or Cliff Burton original Metallica basis.

0:04:18.902 --> 0:04:20.502
<v Speaker 4>Okay, Well, there we go.

0:04:20.542 --> 0:04:22.262
<v Speaker 2>I feel like I've learned more about you in the

0:04:22.342 --> 0:04:24.822
<v Speaker 2>last few minutes than I can find on the entire Internet.

0:04:25.942 --> 0:04:28.022
<v Speaker 2>And I'm not actually allowed to tell listeners your name.

0:04:28.582 --> 0:04:32.582
<v Speaker 2>It's been nine years of you making case file. Have

0:04:32.702 --> 0:04:36.182
<v Speaker 2>you ever considered just revealing who you are? Or has

0:04:36.222 --> 0:04:37.262
<v Speaker 2>it become part of the brand?

0:04:37.662 --> 0:04:41.702
<v Speaker 3>Not really, No, I guess it has become part of it,

0:04:41.782 --> 0:04:44.462
<v Speaker 3>but inadvertently it's kind of like an accident because it

0:04:44.542 --> 0:04:48.502
<v Speaker 3>was never planned. It was never supposed to be a thing,

0:04:49.102 --> 0:04:51.142
<v Speaker 3>the anonymous hosting, but it just kind of took off

0:04:51.182 --> 0:04:53.382
<v Speaker 3>into a life of its own. I guess we have

0:04:53.462 --> 0:04:56.262
<v Speaker 3>started branching out. I've done a few live appearances in

0:04:56.342 --> 0:05:01.382
<v Speaker 3>recent times. There's no photo policy, and I still don't

0:05:02.342 --> 0:05:06.302
<v Speaker 3>reveal myself as such. It's more just the case, false

0:05:06.382 --> 0:05:09.542
<v Speaker 3>story and that sort of thing. I'm comfortable with that.

0:05:09.542 --> 0:05:11.702
<v Speaker 3>That's been fine, But yeah, I don't think I'll ever

0:05:11.742 --> 0:05:15.582
<v Speaker 3>be a personality, so to speak.

0:05:16.342 --> 0:05:20.742
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's very fun trying to look at what people

0:05:20.782 --> 0:05:23.782
<v Speaker 2>have kind of found out about you? Is that fun

0:05:23.822 --> 0:05:25.982
<v Speaker 2>to watch people trying to work it out?

0:05:26.302 --> 0:05:27.902
<v Speaker 3>I did get a little bit of a kick out

0:05:27.942 --> 0:05:30.942
<v Speaker 3>of it, sort of initially. I haven't looked at it

0:05:30.982 --> 0:05:34.102
<v Speaker 3>for a few years now, but there were some weird

0:05:34.142 --> 0:05:35.902
<v Speaker 3>and wild theories.

0:05:35.542 --> 0:05:36.502
<v Speaker 5>There are out there.

0:05:37.262 --> 0:05:39.422
<v Speaker 3>Some I'm like, how do people even come up with that?

0:05:39.422 --> 0:05:41.262
<v Speaker 3>That is like completely made up?

0:05:41.382 --> 0:05:41.582
<v Speaker 5>Yeah?

0:05:41.622 --> 0:05:44.302
<v Speaker 3>They stayed it like it's just so matter of fact.

0:05:45.182 --> 0:05:46.662
<v Speaker 3>It's eye opening.

0:05:46.662 --> 0:05:50.462
<v Speaker 4>Actually, well fans, is it fans that have nicknamed you Casey?

0:05:51.262 --> 0:05:52.782
<v Speaker 5>Yes? That came from listeners.

0:05:53.742 --> 0:05:57.462
<v Speaker 3>So just that came off the back of the anonymous

0:05:57.462 --> 0:05:59.782
<v Speaker 3>host thing, people like, well, who is this person?

0:05:59.782 --> 0:06:00.382
<v Speaker 5>What's going on?

0:06:00.462 --> 0:06:03.262
<v Speaker 3>And I can't remember if it was a Reddit thread

0:06:03.342 --> 0:06:07.822
<v Speaker 3>or a Facebook group maybe, but there's one of those,

0:06:08.342 --> 0:06:11.582
<v Speaker 3>and listeners just started using case and that sort of

0:06:11.622 --> 0:06:12.022
<v Speaker 3>took off.

0:06:12.182 --> 0:06:14.902
<v Speaker 2>It's probably more catchy to say than anonymous host, So

0:06:14.982 --> 0:06:15.662
<v Speaker 2>I can see.

0:06:15.462 --> 0:06:17.902
<v Speaker 3>Why that's a bit of a mouthful. Isn't it an

0:06:17.942 --> 0:06:20.542
<v Speaker 3>anonymous host? It doesn't really.

0:06:20.982 --> 0:06:23.262
<v Speaker 2>But you've taken on Casey as kind of like the

0:06:23.382 --> 0:06:26.622
<v Speaker 2>identity as well. You've got an Instagram handle, is that

0:06:26.742 --> 0:06:27.582
<v Speaker 2>you Casey?

0:06:27.662 --> 0:06:27.862
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

0:06:27.902 --> 0:06:32.502
<v Speaker 5>That's me for photography? Bad photography? Mind?

0:06:32.542 --> 0:06:34.462
<v Speaker 3>You on the iPhone is a bit of a hobby

0:06:34.502 --> 0:06:37.822
<v Speaker 3>of mine, particularly live music and stuff. So it's just

0:06:37.942 --> 0:06:40.822
<v Speaker 3>like a just something I like to do in a downtime,

0:06:40.982 --> 0:06:42.582
<v Speaker 3>play around with a few photos and stuff.

0:06:42.702 --> 0:06:46.102
<v Speaker 5>I thought, oh, I'm not as well put them.

0:06:45.942 --> 0:06:48.622
<v Speaker 3>Out there, I guess, and adopt the name yeah, and

0:06:48.662 --> 0:06:50.022
<v Speaker 3>just lean into the name yep.

0:06:50.862 --> 0:06:51.902
<v Speaker 4>Take me back to the start.

0:06:52.022 --> 0:06:56.462
<v Speaker 2>How did you find yourself sitting down and starting a podcast?

0:06:56.982 --> 0:06:59.462
<v Speaker 3>So it's something that I'd wanted to do for a

0:06:59.462 --> 0:07:01.222
<v Speaker 3>little while, a few years. I'd say I was a

0:07:01.302 --> 0:07:03.622
<v Speaker 3>pretty early adopter of podcasts.

0:07:03.822 --> 0:07:05.382
<v Speaker 4>So it's twenty sixteen, right.

0:07:05.462 --> 0:07:07.822
<v Speaker 3>That's when case fol started. But I've been listening to

0:07:07.902 --> 0:07:10.062
<v Speaker 3>podcasts since I think it's like two thousand and eight

0:07:10.182 --> 0:07:14.542
<v Speaker 3>to something like that. So my housemate at the time

0:07:14.742 --> 0:07:17.422
<v Speaker 3>put me onto them. I'd never heard of them, and

0:07:17.982 --> 0:07:22.022
<v Speaker 3>leaning back into that music theme, I discovered Alternative Press

0:07:22.382 --> 0:07:25.102
<v Speaker 3>had a podcast and it was just long form interviews

0:07:25.142 --> 0:07:26.942
<v Speaker 3>with a lot of the bands that I liked. I

0:07:26.942 --> 0:07:30.022
<v Speaker 3>thought it was really cool because up until that point

0:07:30.062 --> 0:07:33.302
<v Speaker 3>there'd never really been anything like that to get insight

0:07:33.622 --> 0:07:36.862
<v Speaker 3>into artists. It was a snippet in a magazine or

0:07:37.542 --> 0:07:39.062
<v Speaker 3>a little bit here or there, but to get this

0:07:39.142 --> 0:07:43.022
<v Speaker 3>really long form conversation. I was immediately drawn in loved it,

0:07:43.582 --> 0:07:48.262
<v Speaker 3>and so I'd been a fan for a few years

0:07:48.422 --> 0:07:51.342
<v Speaker 3>and that sort of branched out into other podcasts after that,

0:07:51.422 --> 0:07:53.622
<v Speaker 3>and it was always in my mind I thought this'd

0:07:53.662 --> 0:07:55.582
<v Speaker 3>be cool to do, and I played around with a

0:07:55.582 --> 0:07:59.702
<v Speaker 3>few ideas, maybe a rugby league one, maybe a music one.

0:08:00.222 --> 0:08:04.342
<v Speaker 3>I started looking into music pretty heavily, but obviously a

0:08:04.462 --> 0:08:07.822
<v Speaker 3>nightmare because you can't play music, podcast licensing, all that

0:08:07.822 --> 0:08:09.942
<v Speaker 3>sort of stuff, So I wasn't really sure how to

0:08:10.222 --> 0:08:16.262
<v Speaker 3>approach that. And I'd always been a consumer, I guess

0:08:16.342 --> 0:08:19.222
<v Speaker 3>of true crime from a young age. I remember back

0:08:20.302 --> 0:08:23.542
<v Speaker 3>I would have been like ten. I was babysat by

0:08:23.582 --> 0:08:26.182
<v Speaker 3>my auntie a lot back then, and she had this

0:08:26.222 --> 0:08:29.142
<v Speaker 3>whole shelf full of true crime magazines. I forget the

0:08:29.222 --> 0:08:30.542
<v Speaker 3>name of it, you know, but it was like a

0:08:30.582 --> 0:08:35.542
<v Speaker 3>weekly one available at their newsagents magazine. Yeah, so every

0:08:35.542 --> 0:08:37.142
<v Speaker 3>week one a new one would come out at the

0:08:37.182 --> 0:08:39.622
<v Speaker 3>magazine and it was like in long form on one case,

0:08:39.902 --> 0:08:41.582
<v Speaker 3>and she had a whole shelf of them. So it

0:08:41.662 --> 0:08:44.702
<v Speaker 3>was probably way too young to be reading about the

0:08:44.822 --> 0:08:49.982
<v Speaker 3>Yorkshire Ripper and other such cases. But so from a

0:08:50.022 --> 0:08:54.382
<v Speaker 3>young age, and I remember always having an interest in

0:08:54.622 --> 0:08:56.422
<v Speaker 3>the human.

0:08:56.182 --> 0:08:58.062
<v Speaker 5>Side of it, was like what causes it? How does

0:08:58.102 --> 0:09:00.022
<v Speaker 5>this happen? Even from such a young age.

0:09:00.022 --> 0:09:00.182
<v Speaker 6>You know.

0:09:00.462 --> 0:09:03.462
<v Speaker 3>I don't think I was throwing around terms like nature, verse,

0:09:03.582 --> 0:09:06.982
<v Speaker 3>nurture back then, but essentially that's what I was wondering

0:09:07.182 --> 0:09:10.702
<v Speaker 3>at that time, like how does this happen? It was

0:09:10.782 --> 0:09:13.742
<v Speaker 3>It wasn't like a lifelong thing, you know, I'd sort

0:09:13.742 --> 0:09:17.142
<v Speaker 3>of in and out of it. A book would come along,

0:09:17.782 --> 0:09:20.902
<v Speaker 3>like I think one of the first books I read

0:09:20.942 --> 0:09:23.982
<v Speaker 3>was Helter Skelter at true crime books that is.

0:09:24.822 --> 0:09:26.462
<v Speaker 5>And then there was.

0:09:26.502 --> 0:09:31.942
<v Speaker 3>ABC had a like a tele dramatized based on true

0:09:31.942 --> 0:09:33.302
<v Speaker 3>events called Blue Murder.

0:09:33.462 --> 0:09:34.182
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I remember that.

0:09:34.542 --> 0:09:38.222
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, So I got right into that and tried to

0:09:38.222 --> 0:09:40.382
<v Speaker 3>find every book that I could on that case and

0:09:41.462 --> 0:09:43.902
<v Speaker 3>the players that were involved in that. So I've always

0:09:43.902 --> 0:09:47.462
<v Speaker 3>had an interest in it. And so around this time,

0:09:49.022 --> 0:09:51.022
<v Speaker 3>Cereal had been out for I think a few years

0:09:51.022 --> 0:09:53.382
<v Speaker 3>by this point, but I was a late adopter to Cereal,

0:09:53.902 --> 0:09:57.142
<v Speaker 3>and Making a Murderer was big at that time as well,

0:09:57.182 --> 0:10:02.062
<v Speaker 3>So true crime was sort of back bubbling bubbling, and

0:10:02.862 --> 0:10:05.662
<v Speaker 3>it just occurred to me just because I'd always had

0:10:05.902 --> 0:10:07.822
<v Speaker 3>from a young age and interest in it. I thought,

0:10:08.102 --> 0:10:11.262
<v Speaker 3>I wonder if that is some that would work on

0:10:11.262 --> 0:10:15.582
<v Speaker 3>a podcast, and I started researching. So this is twenty fifteen,

0:10:16.382 --> 0:10:19.182
<v Speaker 3>hard to imagine, but a very different landscape. Back then,

0:10:19.222 --> 0:10:22.742
<v Speaker 3>there was hardly any true crime podcasts, very different to today.

0:10:22.542 --> 0:10:23.502
<v Speaker 4>Especially in Australia.

0:10:23.542 --> 0:10:27.022
<v Speaker 5>I'm guessing I don't think there were any in Australia.

0:10:27.262 --> 0:10:28.742
<v Speaker 3>I could be wrong. There might have been something that

0:10:28.782 --> 0:10:30.502
<v Speaker 3>I just didn't find. I'm not saying case f I

0:10:30.662 --> 0:10:34.022
<v Speaker 3>was the first, but the handful that I did find

0:10:34.902 --> 0:10:39.382
<v Speaker 3>were a lot more formatted around that multiple hosts, round

0:10:39.382 --> 0:10:43.582
<v Speaker 3>table discussion format. There was obviously serial, the documentary style,

0:10:43.622 --> 0:10:46.222
<v Speaker 3>and then there was another one or two like that

0:10:46.222 --> 0:10:48.382
<v Speaker 3>that would play nine to one one calls and interview

0:10:48.382 --> 0:10:51.502
<v Speaker 3>clips and things like that. Now, at that time, I

0:10:51.542 --> 0:10:54.982
<v Speaker 3>was heavily influenced by a podcast called Hardcore History by

0:10:55.102 --> 0:10:59.422
<v Speaker 3>Dan Carlin. What I found so fascinating about that podcast

0:10:59.702 --> 0:11:04.862
<v Speaker 3>was the in depth storytelling by a single narrator. So

0:11:04.942 --> 0:11:08.182
<v Speaker 3>up until that point I'd only ever heard like interview

0:11:08.222 --> 0:11:11.382
<v Speaker 3>style podcasts. I thought that's what podcasts. Well, there was

0:11:11.462 --> 0:11:13.702
<v Speaker 3>Serial that was more documentary style, but I'd never really

0:11:13.742 --> 0:11:16.782
<v Speaker 3>heard anything like Hardcore History, which was just one voice,

0:11:16.862 --> 0:11:19.742
<v Speaker 3>no clips, no nothing, just his voice for like five

0:11:19.782 --> 0:11:25.982
<v Speaker 3>hours telling a story something complex, like a complex historical event,

0:11:26.942 --> 0:11:29.462
<v Speaker 3>and it was so compelling. I thought that just got

0:11:29.462 --> 0:11:33.342
<v Speaker 3>my mind ticking over. I was like, Oh, it showed

0:11:33.382 --> 0:11:35.942
<v Speaker 3>me that was possible. And when I was trying to

0:11:35.942 --> 0:11:38.102
<v Speaker 3>come up with the format and then looking what was

0:11:38.142 --> 0:11:41.102
<v Speaker 3>out there with true crime, I saw I couldn't find

0:11:41.142 --> 0:11:45.822
<v Speaker 3>anything out there like that, and so I just borrowed,

0:11:45.942 --> 0:11:49.342
<v Speaker 3>copied inspired by whatever you want to say, Dan Carlin's

0:11:49.382 --> 0:11:52.302
<v Speaker 3>hardcore History into true crime.

0:11:53.582 --> 0:11:56.142
<v Speaker 2>It just goes to show that sometimes it's the simplest

0:11:56.182 --> 0:12:00.582
<v Speaker 2>ideas that end up being gold because it really is

0:12:00.662 --> 0:12:03.142
<v Speaker 2>just your voice for an hour, sometimes an hour and

0:12:03.182 --> 0:12:06.222
<v Speaker 2>a half. There's no other audio apart from like a

0:12:06.222 --> 0:12:07.742
<v Speaker 2>bit of a music bed sometimes.

0:12:08.022 --> 0:12:11.982
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so there is a music bed. Very rarely do

0:12:12.062 --> 0:12:16.062
<v Speaker 3>we play like interrogation clips or things like that. We

0:12:16.502 --> 0:12:19.582
<v Speaker 3>have done, but it's pretty rare that that all happened.

0:12:19.582 --> 0:12:21.102
<v Speaker 3>So usually it's just my voice.

0:12:21.262 --> 0:12:27.662
<v Speaker 2>Yep, you're listening to true crime conversations with me, Jemma Bath.

0:12:28.102 --> 0:12:30.782
<v Speaker 4>I'm speaking with the anonymous host of case File.

0:12:31.342 --> 0:12:34.062
<v Speaker 2>Up next, we go back to the start the making

0:12:34.222 --> 0:12:40.262
<v Speaker 2>of the very first episode of Case File. So take

0:12:40.262 --> 0:12:43.062
<v Speaker 2>me through recording that first episode.

0:12:43.182 --> 0:12:44.982
<v Speaker 4>Where are you? What does it look like? Do you

0:12:44.982 --> 0:12:46.262
<v Speaker 4>have a mic? Do you have a setup?

0:12:46.662 --> 0:12:48.662
<v Speaker 5>It was bad, It was very bad.

0:12:48.982 --> 0:12:51.462
<v Speaker 3>I had no idea what I was doing from a

0:12:51.502 --> 0:12:53.782
<v Speaker 3>technical standpoint.

0:12:54.302 --> 0:12:55.422
<v Speaker 5>One mention of the word.

0:12:55.262 --> 0:12:57.302
<v Speaker 3>One, there is enough essentials down the spine of those

0:12:57.342 --> 0:13:00.102
<v Speaker 3>who remember the case that dominated the television reports, radio

0:13:00.102 --> 0:13:03.142
<v Speaker 3>air waves, and print media of the day. One of

0:13:03.182 --> 0:13:05.862
<v Speaker 3>my hobbies is I played guitar bass guitar at home,

0:13:05.942 --> 0:13:09.062
<v Speaker 3>and I had a little interface that I could record

0:13:09.142 --> 0:13:13.382
<v Speaker 3>myself on garage on my Mac and so on. That interface,

0:13:13.422 --> 0:13:16.382
<v Speaker 3>which was designed to plug a guitar in it also

0:13:16.422 --> 0:13:19.582
<v Speaker 3>had like this little mic smaller than the size of

0:13:19.622 --> 0:13:22.942
<v Speaker 3>a five cent piece on it. I thought, oh, yeah,

0:13:23.262 --> 0:13:26.502
<v Speaker 3>that'll do. So I just plugged that in to the laptop.

0:13:26.542 --> 0:13:29.142
<v Speaker 3>It was sitting on my desk nowhere in my mouth

0:13:29.222 --> 0:13:34.462
<v Speaker 3>over there somewhere, and I just started talking, did what

0:13:34.542 --> 0:13:37.622
<v Speaker 3>I could on garage band with my limited knowledge, and

0:13:37.662 --> 0:13:44.262
<v Speaker 3>then released it. It sounds awful, but so what I'm

0:13:44.342 --> 0:13:47.662
<v Speaker 3>very thankful for in those early days we got some

0:13:47.742 --> 0:13:52.382
<v Speaker 3>good constructive feedback in that. Look, this content is pretty good,

0:13:52.422 --> 0:13:55.382
<v Speaker 3>but this sounds awful. Can you get someone to do

0:13:55.462 --> 0:13:59.022
<v Speaker 3>something with your audio? I thought that's probably fair enough,

0:13:59.062 --> 0:14:04.182
<v Speaker 3>so I advertised for an audio producer on a freelance website.

0:14:04.302 --> 0:14:06.062
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, things up work, I think it was.

0:14:06.542 --> 0:14:10.262
<v Speaker 3>And it was hard to write that job the scriptum

0:14:10.742 --> 0:14:12.822
<v Speaker 3>because I didn't know what I was asking for, because

0:14:12.822 --> 0:14:14.702
<v Speaker 3>I had no knowledge of what I was doing. So

0:14:15.822 --> 0:14:20.102
<v Speaker 3>I put together something and probably twenty to thirty people applied,

0:14:20.302 --> 0:14:22.062
<v Speaker 3>and so I thought the best way to work this

0:14:22.182 --> 0:14:24.462
<v Speaker 3>out was I just had a one minute snippet from

0:14:24.502 --> 0:14:29.542
<v Speaker 3>an episode and the job description was fixed. This just

0:14:29.662 --> 0:14:31.302
<v Speaker 3>show me what you can do, basically. And then I

0:14:31.422 --> 0:14:35.102
<v Speaker 3>listened to it and there was one standout, which was

0:14:35.142 --> 0:14:37.782
<v Speaker 3>Mike Megus, who is still the current case for a

0:14:37.862 --> 0:14:40.982
<v Speaker 3>producer to Next Day. Yeah, nine years on, so he

0:14:41.742 --> 0:14:43.822
<v Speaker 3>was one of the applicants. I listened to his snippet

0:14:44.062 --> 0:14:47.102
<v Speaker 3>head and shoulders above anyone else. Then I looked at

0:14:47.142 --> 0:14:51.302
<v Speaker 3>his resume. Worked at Pinewood Studios in the UK, worked

0:14:51.302 --> 0:14:53.542
<v Speaker 3>on this Star Wars movie, worked on this Disney movie.

0:14:53.582 --> 0:14:57.622
<v Speaker 3>I'm like, oh, dear, no, no wonder, it sounds so good,

0:14:57.622 --> 0:15:01.782
<v Speaker 3>but I can't afford this. But I messaged him and

0:15:01.822 --> 0:15:05.262
<v Speaker 3>we got chatting, and he had actually just left Pinewood

0:15:05.262 --> 0:15:08.262
<v Speaker 3>Studios and was coming out as a freelancer. He hadn't

0:15:08.262 --> 0:15:11.782
<v Speaker 3>worked with podcasts before, so he was keen to just

0:15:13.502 --> 0:15:15.662
<v Speaker 3>try it and dip his toes into it, get experience

0:15:15.702 --> 0:15:19.622
<v Speaker 3>with podcasts, and he gave me a very favorable rate.

0:15:19.822 --> 0:15:20.702
<v Speaker 5>So thank you, Mike.

0:15:20.822 --> 0:15:23.422
<v Speaker 2>So you found him at a good time, a good time.

0:15:23.622 --> 0:15:26.062
<v Speaker 2>How many podcasts in were you hiring Mike?

0:15:27.142 --> 0:15:29.542
<v Speaker 5>Was? Episode seven was the first one he worked on.

0:15:30.342 --> 0:15:33.462
<v Speaker 2>And by that point, did you have an audience? What

0:15:33.502 --> 0:15:35.462
<v Speaker 2>did your audience look like in those early episodes.

0:15:37.222 --> 0:15:39.982
<v Speaker 3>I remember my goal when I released the first episode

0:15:40.062 --> 0:15:42.262
<v Speaker 3>was to get to one hundred, one hundred downloads, one

0:15:42.302 --> 0:15:46.062
<v Speaker 3>hundred downloads, and that happened in twenty four hours, and

0:15:46.262 --> 0:15:48.062
<v Speaker 3>so by the end of the first week it was

0:15:48.342 --> 0:15:54.462
<v Speaker 3>about one thousand, and it sort of slowly, just it

0:15:54.622 --> 0:15:57.982
<v Speaker 3>sort of came in blocks. So by six months we

0:15:57.982 --> 0:16:02.662
<v Speaker 3>were averaging fifty thousand plus an episode. Then by the

0:16:02.742 --> 0:16:04.262
<v Speaker 3>end of the first year it was two hundred and

0:16:04.302 --> 0:16:07.622
<v Speaker 3>fifty thousand an episode, and then before I knew it

0:16:07.662 --> 0:16:11.302
<v Speaker 3>into the second year was a million plus. Just was

0:16:11.342 --> 0:16:16.222
<v Speaker 3>like stages, It was very it almost didn't seem real

0:16:16.262 --> 0:16:17.382
<v Speaker 3>because there was no promotion.

0:16:17.542 --> 0:16:19.502
<v Speaker 5>There was nothing say how did.

0:16:19.382 --> 0:16:22.342
<v Speaker 2>You like, did you just go on to one of

0:16:22.382 --> 0:16:25.542
<v Speaker 2>the platforms and release it? Did you advertise it on

0:16:25.622 --> 0:16:26.302
<v Speaker 2>social media?

0:16:26.342 --> 0:16:26.422
<v Speaker 3>Like?

0:16:26.462 --> 0:16:27.342
<v Speaker 4>How did you get it out there?

0:16:27.382 --> 0:16:31.382
<v Speaker 3>It was I believe the first hosting platform was SoundCloud actually,

0:16:31.382 --> 0:16:34.302
<v Speaker 3>so I put it on SoundCloud and through there they

0:16:34.302 --> 0:16:36.702
<v Speaker 3>had an RSS capability, So it went out to Apple

0:16:36.742 --> 0:16:40.462
<v Speaker 3>and all the everywhere that you can get podcasts, set

0:16:40.542 --> 0:16:42.022
<v Speaker 3>up a Facebook.

0:16:41.542 --> 0:16:47.222
<v Speaker 5>Page and it just grew, it just grew. It was

0:16:47.262 --> 0:16:48.062
<v Speaker 5>just word of mouth.

0:16:48.622 --> 0:16:50.822
<v Speaker 4>What was the first episode on do you remember?

0:16:51.062 --> 0:16:51.262
<v Speaker 6>Yeah?

0:16:51.262 --> 0:16:53.822
<v Speaker 5>The first episode was the Wonder Beach Murders.

0:16:53.742 --> 0:16:56.022
<v Speaker 4>So a really infamous one.

0:16:56.342 --> 0:17:00.702
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, infamous Australian one. And I guess I covered that

0:17:00.782 --> 0:17:03.662
<v Speaker 3>one because it was a case that I'd heard a

0:17:03.662 --> 0:17:09.262
<v Speaker 3>lot about growing up. It was sort of almost mythical

0:17:09.342 --> 0:17:11.422
<v Speaker 3>in a way, the way it was about an urban

0:17:11.542 --> 0:17:14.062
<v Speaker 3>legend of not an urban legend, obviously it's real case,

0:17:14.102 --> 0:17:16.142
<v Speaker 3>but the way it was spoken about growing up, it

0:17:16.182 --> 0:17:20.142
<v Speaker 3>was almost like that. And I realized I knew nothing

0:17:20.142 --> 0:17:22.582
<v Speaker 3>about it, so I thought that was a good place

0:17:22.622 --> 0:17:26.902
<v Speaker 3>to start. Just as this wasn't planned, This wasn't supposed

0:17:26.902 --> 0:17:30.502
<v Speaker 3>to go to an audience This was a project that

0:17:30.742 --> 0:17:34.662
<v Speaker 3>I was doing while I was off work injured, so

0:17:34.782 --> 0:17:36.622
<v Speaker 3>it was literally just to fill in the time until

0:17:36.622 --> 0:17:38.302
<v Speaker 3>I went back to work. So I didn't get crazy

0:17:38.342 --> 0:17:41.422
<v Speaker 3>because this was my third serious rehab from an injury

0:17:41.422 --> 0:17:45.262
<v Speaker 3>in quick succession, and that can be a pretty dark

0:17:45.302 --> 0:17:47.782
<v Speaker 3>and lonely time, especially for someone who likes to play sport,

0:17:47.902 --> 0:17:51.382
<v Speaker 3>keep fit active. It's almost sort of part of my identity.

0:17:51.502 --> 0:17:56.102
<v Speaker 3>So being stuck through the rehab process it was pretty tough.

0:17:56.182 --> 0:17:58.182
<v Speaker 3>That third one was a pretty serious injury too. So

0:17:59.982 --> 0:18:02.222
<v Speaker 3>I'd been wanting to start a podcast for a few years.

0:18:02.222 --> 0:18:07.062
<v Speaker 3>I thought, well, this is my chance, and yeah, I

0:18:07.782 --> 0:18:09.862
<v Speaker 3>none of this was planned.

0:18:10.702 --> 0:18:11.382
<v Speaker 5>Maybe do three.

0:18:11.262 --> 0:18:15.302
<v Speaker 2>Episodes as your podcast started to grow. I know you're

0:18:15.342 --> 0:18:17.982
<v Speaker 2>anonymous to the world, but your loved ones they would

0:18:17.982 --> 0:18:19.782
<v Speaker 2>have known that you were starting a podcast. What did

0:18:19.782 --> 0:18:20.382
<v Speaker 2>they think about it?

0:18:20.382 --> 0:18:20.542
<v Speaker 4>All?

0:18:20.782 --> 0:18:21.222
<v Speaker 5>Not many.

0:18:21.942 --> 0:18:24.102
<v Speaker 3>I kept it pretty much well on the down low.

0:18:25.262 --> 0:18:27.462
<v Speaker 3>I told a few friends and they kind of just

0:18:27.542 --> 0:18:32.302
<v Speaker 3>laughed at it, said, though, that's stupid, what are you doing.

0:18:32.382 --> 0:18:35.222
<v Speaker 3>What are you doing that for? Basically, you know, in

0:18:35.222 --> 0:18:39.422
<v Speaker 3>a friendly banter tight way, I guess, But yeah, I

0:18:39.502 --> 0:18:42.222
<v Speaker 3>kept it pretty well on the down low, just something

0:18:42.222 --> 0:18:46.102
<v Speaker 3>that I just did put my head down and just

0:18:46.222 --> 0:18:48.182
<v Speaker 3>kept putting it out there. No one I worked with

0:18:48.302 --> 0:18:49.182
<v Speaker 3>knew about it.

0:18:49.902 --> 0:18:51.502
<v Speaker 4>So you ended up going back to work and you

0:18:51.502 --> 0:18:53.422
<v Speaker 4>were doing this on the side, yep.

0:18:53.902 --> 0:18:56.382
<v Speaker 3>Yep, So I went back to eventually got back to work,

0:18:57.622 --> 0:19:01.022
<v Speaker 3>and yeah, just on the days off and you or

0:19:01.062 --> 0:19:04.582
<v Speaker 3>after work even Yeah, kept working on case file and

0:19:04.622 --> 0:19:08.142
<v Speaker 3>it kept growing and growing and growing. Eventually I realized

0:19:08.142 --> 0:19:12.822
<v Speaker 3>that I needed help yep. So we got our first

0:19:13.462 --> 0:19:18.582
<v Speaker 3>researcher and writer to assist, and yeah, from there, the

0:19:18.622 --> 0:19:21.942
<v Speaker 3>team has just gradually grown and yeah, now we have

0:19:23.102 --> 0:19:27.822
<v Speaker 3>two full time audio producers, three full time researchers, writers,

0:19:27.862 --> 0:19:29.662
<v Speaker 3>and additional freelancers as well.

0:19:29.822 --> 0:19:35.342
<v Speaker 2>Wow, prior to hiring a researcher to obviously help you

0:19:35.382 --> 0:19:39.422
<v Speaker 2>write those scripts because they're long, they're detailed, how much

0:19:40.022 --> 0:19:42.782
<v Speaker 2>work were you putting into that script?

0:19:43.022 --> 0:19:43.902
<v Speaker 4>Because it's.

0:19:45.302 --> 0:19:48.502
<v Speaker 2>It's hard to get that amount of detail, and like,

0:19:48.542 --> 0:19:51.222
<v Speaker 2>if you get anything wrong, people are going to pick

0:19:51.302 --> 0:19:52.902
<v Speaker 2>up on it.

0:19:52.942 --> 0:19:53.582
<v Speaker 4>Is it ours?

0:19:53.862 --> 0:19:53.982
<v Speaker 6>Oh?

0:19:54.502 --> 0:19:58.622
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it was a non stop It was literally I

0:19:58.622 --> 0:20:00.782
<v Speaker 3>didn't have anything else in life. I go to work

0:20:00.822 --> 0:20:03.942
<v Speaker 3>and I come home and like I'd work shift work,

0:20:03.982 --> 0:20:07.342
<v Speaker 3>So sometimes after a night shift, I'd literally just not sleep.

0:20:08.702 --> 0:20:13.062
<v Speaker 5>Because it was that full on. So, yeah, it was a.

0:20:14.862 --> 0:20:16.742
<v Speaker 3>Lot, a lot of there's still a lot of work now,

0:20:16.742 --> 0:20:20.702
<v Speaker 3>but obviously it's much smoother in operation with having such

0:20:20.702 --> 0:20:22.662
<v Speaker 3>a talented team working on it now.

0:20:22.702 --> 0:20:24.462
<v Speaker 5>But yeah, back then it was pretty full long.

0:20:24.702 --> 0:20:29.142
<v Speaker 2>Given it's your baby, though, it's your case file is

0:20:29.182 --> 0:20:34.822
<v Speaker 2>your child? Do you struggle to give it to other people?

0:20:34.902 --> 0:20:36.662
<v Speaker 2>Are you very close to it still in terms of

0:20:36.702 --> 0:20:38.582
<v Speaker 2>the writing of those scripts and the research and how

0:20:38.582 --> 0:20:39.422
<v Speaker 2>the process goes.

0:20:39.862 --> 0:20:41.742
<v Speaker 3>No, I've got a lot of faith in the team,

0:20:41.982 --> 0:20:45.382
<v Speaker 3>So it's once it's been very fortunate just to find

0:20:45.422 --> 0:20:48.902
<v Speaker 3>such talented and hard working people who I trust. So

0:20:49.662 --> 0:20:51.942
<v Speaker 3>once these people have my trust, it's I'm happy to

0:20:51.982 --> 0:20:56.102
<v Speaker 3>step away. And so the writing and research team now

0:20:56.262 --> 0:20:59.982
<v Speaker 3>is fully led by women. All the rids of researchers

0:20:59.982 --> 0:21:03.782
<v Speaker 3>are women. The head writer, Millie is in charge of

0:21:03.862 --> 0:21:07.862
<v Speaker 3>all the cases, what we're covering, what's the release schedule,

0:21:07.982 --> 0:21:12.142
<v Speaker 3>all of that. Mike's in charge of the production side

0:21:12.142 --> 0:21:15.502
<v Speaker 3>of it, the audio production, what music goes on, and

0:21:15.662 --> 0:21:19.662
<v Speaker 3>sort of the audio production elements. So yeah, and I

0:21:19.742 --> 0:21:23.182
<v Speaker 3>have full trust in the whole team to do that

0:21:23.422 --> 0:21:23.902
<v Speaker 3>because this.

0:21:23.942 --> 0:21:26.862
<v Speaker 2>Is no longer well and truly no longer your side hustle,

0:21:26.902 --> 0:21:30.902
<v Speaker 2>this is your job, right When were you able to

0:21:30.942 --> 0:21:34.742
<v Speaker 2>kind of be like, Okay, goodbye, former career, I'm doing this.

0:21:35.702 --> 0:21:38.982
<v Speaker 3>So case fil was released in episode one in January

0:21:39.022 --> 0:21:42.302
<v Speaker 3>twenty sixteen. It was the end of twenty seventeen where

0:21:42.302 --> 0:21:46.382
<v Speaker 3>I took leave without pay from my job for a year,

0:21:47.102 --> 0:21:49.782
<v Speaker 3>just to I was very on the fence and uming

0:21:49.862 --> 0:21:51.942
<v Speaker 3>and a ring and I don't know what to do.

0:21:52.262 --> 0:21:55.582
<v Speaker 3>This is, so I thought I'd take the year leave

0:21:55.622 --> 0:21:59.702
<v Speaker 3>without pay. And that year went so quick it's unbelievable.

0:21:59.822 --> 0:22:02.462
<v Speaker 3>Was almost like I blinked and then works ringing me,

0:22:03.102 --> 0:22:07.142
<v Speaker 3>are you coming back? And I still wasn't sure at

0:22:07.142 --> 0:22:10.342
<v Speaker 3>that stage. I requested another six months and they said

0:22:11.422 --> 0:22:14.982
<v Speaker 3>either coming back or you're leaving, And so ultimately I

0:22:15.102 --> 0:22:17.182
<v Speaker 3>just decided to leave and try it full time.

0:22:17.222 --> 0:22:19.902
<v Speaker 5>And yeah, so still able to do it. Now?

0:22:20.862 --> 0:22:23.262
<v Speaker 2>What were you sure about? What made you think so hard?

0:22:24.262 --> 0:22:25.502
<v Speaker 2>Did you love your former career?

0:22:26.942 --> 0:22:28.982
<v Speaker 3>I wouldn't say that it was just more stable. I

0:22:28.982 --> 0:22:34.502
<v Speaker 3>guess so because it was it's the unknown a podcast,

0:22:34.582 --> 0:22:37.342
<v Speaker 3>So I don't know, especially back then in two thousand

0:22:37.382 --> 0:22:41.862
<v Speaker 3>and seventeen, it was just it was very much outside

0:22:41.902 --> 0:22:44.942
<v Speaker 3>of my comfort zone, I guess, and I just wasn't

0:22:44.982 --> 0:22:47.182
<v Speaker 3>sure about it. It was like, ah, this is a big

0:22:47.262 --> 0:22:51.662
<v Speaker 3>risk and pressure, but it was good. It was the

0:22:51.702 --> 0:22:52.782
<v Speaker 3>best decision I made.

0:22:52.862 --> 0:22:54.862
<v Speaker 2>This is a bit of a nerdy behind the scenes question,

0:22:55.342 --> 0:22:58.782
<v Speaker 2>but it's pretty common knowledge that advertisers get a bit

0:22:58.822 --> 0:23:01.502
<v Speaker 2>scared of true crime as a genre because we talk

0:23:01.542 --> 0:23:07.302
<v Speaker 2>about murder, blood gore, you know, often deeply harrowing content.

0:23:07.982 --> 0:23:13.102
<v Speaker 2>Has that been a challenge for you in trying to monetize.

0:23:12.382 --> 0:23:14.902
<v Speaker 3>It has been relayed back to me a little bit,

0:23:14.942 --> 0:23:18.342
<v Speaker 3>But from what I've picked up over the years, that

0:23:18.502 --> 0:23:21.662
<v Speaker 3>is a very much Australian thing, right, not so much

0:23:21.662 --> 0:23:25.542
<v Speaker 3>in the US. And we're very fortunate where we have

0:23:25.662 --> 0:23:30.462
<v Speaker 3>such a big audience in the US. It was actually

0:23:30.542 --> 0:23:33.622
<v Speaker 3>half our audience for a number of years was US based.

0:23:33.662 --> 0:23:36.342
<v Speaker 3>It's okay, it's sort of come back a little bit now.

0:23:36.382 --> 0:23:40.102
<v Speaker 3>I think it's even Australia thirty five percent Australia thirty

0:23:40.142 --> 0:23:43.662
<v Speaker 3>five percent US roughly. So we've always had that big

0:23:43.782 --> 0:23:48.862
<v Speaker 3>US audience and the US advertisers don't have that same viewpoint.

0:23:49.382 --> 0:23:54.222
<v Speaker 2>I'm interested to know, like male female split for your podcast,

0:23:54.262 --> 0:23:55.982
<v Speaker 2>do you have a lot of is it mainly women?

0:23:56.022 --> 0:23:56.702
<v Speaker 4>Is it mainly men?

0:23:56.982 --> 0:24:00.662
<v Speaker 5>I believe it's seventy thirty female.

0:24:00.782 --> 0:24:02.382
<v Speaker 4>Seventy percent female?

0:24:02.462 --> 0:24:05.942
<v Speaker 5>Yes, wow, I mean I don't know how accurate that is.

0:24:06.022 --> 0:24:07.702
<v Speaker 3>I don't know how they measure that, but that's the

0:24:07.742 --> 0:24:10.902
<v Speaker 3>stats that come up on our dashboard. Yep, Yeah, it

0:24:10.942 --> 0:24:12.862
<v Speaker 3>was seventy seventy thirty.

0:24:13.062 --> 0:24:14.062
<v Speaker 4>Because we're a bit skewed.

0:24:14.062 --> 0:24:17.582
<v Speaker 2>Obviously we're a women's media company doing a podcast, but

0:24:17.782 --> 0:24:20.702
<v Speaker 2>we have the most male listeners of all the podcasts

0:24:20.702 --> 0:24:21.502
<v Speaker 2>on our network.

0:24:21.902 --> 0:24:23.582
<v Speaker 5>Oh, because a lot of.

0:24:23.622 --> 0:24:26.342
<v Speaker 2>Men don't listen to our the podcast, but they listen

0:24:26.422 --> 0:24:29.342
<v Speaker 2>to us. So that's why I'm so curious to hear it,

0:24:29.342 --> 0:24:31.862
<v Speaker 2>because I do hear that it's women mainly that like

0:24:31.902 --> 0:24:33.662
<v Speaker 2>to listen to true crime podcasts.

0:24:33.862 --> 0:24:37.862
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's certainly the case for us. The live show

0:24:37.862 --> 0:24:41.942
<v Speaker 3>that we did in Australia in November in Melbourne, that

0:24:42.062 --> 0:24:46.422
<v Speaker 3>was it was probably ninety plus women in the audience.

0:24:47.702 --> 0:24:52.542
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, very much skewed towards mostly female listeners.

0:24:53.662 --> 0:24:55.702
<v Speaker 4>Fans of case File.

0:24:55.902 --> 0:24:58.822
<v Speaker 2>The og might not realize, but you have about, if

0:24:58.862 --> 0:25:02.662
<v Speaker 2>I'm correct, twenty one other podcasts under kind of the

0:25:02.702 --> 0:25:06.902
<v Speaker 2>banner of case File presents smaller you know, like the

0:25:06.982 --> 0:25:10.382
<v Speaker 2>Easy Street Murders. You've got like a kind of serie

0:25:10.662 --> 0:25:14.142
<v Speaker 2>on that particular case. How did that come about in

0:25:14.222 --> 0:25:15.982
<v Speaker 2>terms of like branching out and doing that.

0:25:16.502 --> 0:25:19.462
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so that's something that I had thought about pretty

0:25:19.502 --> 0:25:23.222
<v Speaker 3>early on. Once Case File started getting successful, I was

0:25:23.262 --> 0:25:26.662
<v Speaker 3>really interested. As much as my vision for Case fil

0:25:26.742 --> 0:25:29.702
<v Speaker 3>was the style that we do now, I also obviously

0:25:29.742 --> 0:25:32.622
<v Speaker 3>really like Cereal and that style as well, and I

0:25:32.702 --> 0:25:36.142
<v Speaker 3>was interested in trying to do some of that long form, investigative,

0:25:36.262 --> 0:25:39.182
<v Speaker 3>deep dive stuff. And so that's basically how it came about.

0:25:39.222 --> 0:25:42.462
<v Speaker 3>The Case File presents idea, let's give a platform to

0:25:42.582 --> 0:25:46.102
<v Speaker 3>other people to tell their stories. So you know, we

0:25:46.142 --> 0:25:48.462
<v Speaker 3>have like Vicki Petratus, who's done a number well known

0:25:48.462 --> 0:25:53.422
<v Speaker 3>true crime author journalists, pis whoever sort of has a story,

0:25:54.182 --> 0:25:56.462
<v Speaker 3>and we're able to provide that platform, give them an

0:25:56.502 --> 0:25:58.822
<v Speaker 3>audience to elevate their stories.

0:25:59.422 --> 0:26:01.542
<v Speaker 4>And do you work really closely with those podcasts?

0:26:01.662 --> 0:26:04.262
<v Speaker 3>Depends on the show, okay, it just it depends on

0:26:04.302 --> 0:26:06.222
<v Speaker 3>the show, depends on the creator. Some people are like,

0:26:06.422 --> 0:26:08.822
<v Speaker 3>let me alone, I'll send you when I'm done, and

0:26:08.862 --> 0:26:10.982
<v Speaker 3>I'm happy with that because I've obviously put that I

0:26:11.062 --> 0:26:14.782
<v Speaker 3>trust them enough to offer them the opportunity. So I

0:26:14.862 --> 0:26:17.222
<v Speaker 3>believe that they can do it, but other people wanted

0:26:17.222 --> 0:26:19.382
<v Speaker 3>more hands on approach and can you help me outit this?

0:26:19.502 --> 0:26:21.542
<v Speaker 5>And what do you think of this? And so it

0:26:21.622 --> 0:26:22.542
<v Speaker 5>just depends on the show.

0:26:22.982 --> 0:26:25.982
<v Speaker 3>I'm happy to be as involved or as uninvolved as

0:26:26.302 --> 0:26:26.982
<v Speaker 3>they want me to be.

0:26:27.982 --> 0:26:29.502
<v Speaker 2>And this is news to me. But I found out

0:26:29.502 --> 0:26:33.982
<v Speaker 2>today that Case File has a game. Yes, so you

0:26:33.982 --> 0:26:36.142
<v Speaker 2>can play case File board game.

0:26:36.182 --> 0:26:39.862
<v Speaker 3>It's a board game. Yeah, so Goliath, the board game company,

0:26:39.862 --> 0:26:42.262
<v Speaker 3>reached out to us and wanted to do a game,

0:26:42.302 --> 0:26:45.142
<v Speaker 3>and we were a bit unsure about that. Obviously, had

0:26:45.182 --> 0:26:48.422
<v Speaker 3>to just see what they had in mind. But obviously

0:26:48.462 --> 0:26:52.582
<v Speaker 3>it's a completely fictional storyline, and you know, we're happy

0:26:52.582 --> 0:26:55.462
<v Speaker 3>with what they came up with. And yeah, so that's

0:26:55.622 --> 0:26:58.862
<v Speaker 3>They've just released a version two, so they must be

0:26:58.942 --> 0:27:01.662
<v Speaker 3>happy enough with our version one went. Version two is

0:27:01.702 --> 0:27:04.062
<v Speaker 3>only available in the US at this time.

0:27:04.102 --> 0:27:04.302
<v Speaker 5>Though.

0:27:04.862 --> 0:27:06.902
<v Speaker 4>What's your lens?

0:27:07.062 --> 0:27:10.742
<v Speaker 2>Every podcast has like a bit of a lens as

0:27:10.742 --> 0:27:13.582
<v Speaker 2>to how they pick a story or a case that

0:27:13.582 --> 0:27:14.822
<v Speaker 2>they're going to cover.

0:27:14.982 --> 0:27:17.102
<v Speaker 4>Do you have a way to pick?

0:27:17.222 --> 0:27:22.702
<v Speaker 3>There's no one lens I would say, other than we

0:27:22.942 --> 0:27:27.022
<v Speaker 3>don't do a case just because it's gruesome, or to

0:27:27.382 --> 0:27:29.822
<v Speaker 3>cover the gore or you know, big gratrudus or anything

0:27:29.902 --> 0:27:33.142
<v Speaker 3>like that. There's got to be a reason for it. Like,

0:27:34.382 --> 0:27:38.622
<v Speaker 3>I'm personally close to unsolved cases, so I like covering

0:27:38.662 --> 0:27:41.302
<v Speaker 3>those and giving those a voice. But there's reasons to

0:27:41.342 --> 0:27:46.862
<v Speaker 3>cover other stories as well, you know, the societal impacts,

0:27:47.622 --> 0:27:53.742
<v Speaker 3>justice system issues, wrongful convictions, problems with police investigations, voices

0:27:53.742 --> 0:27:59.342
<v Speaker 3>who were ignored, under represented community. There's many, many different reasons.

0:27:59.422 --> 0:28:01.782
<v Speaker 3>It just depends on the case. Yeah, but generally there

0:28:01.782 --> 0:28:04.462
<v Speaker 3>has to be a reason. There's some sort of forensic

0:28:04.502 --> 0:28:08.662
<v Speaker 3>element that's interesting to put out there, or the genetic

0:28:08.702 --> 0:28:11.742
<v Speaker 3>genealogy stuff that's become big in recent years, that sort

0:28:11.782 --> 0:28:12.102
<v Speaker 3>of thing.

0:28:12.782 --> 0:28:17.222
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, do you find that there are certain kind of

0:28:17.222 --> 0:28:20.742
<v Speaker 2>styles that your audience prefers. I'll give you an example

0:28:20.782 --> 0:28:23.062
<v Speaker 2>from our side. Whenever we do an episode about a cult,

0:28:23.822 --> 0:28:27.022
<v Speaker 2>it goes really well. Okay, do you have kind of

0:28:27.102 --> 0:28:29.662
<v Speaker 2>episodes that you know are going to go well before

0:28:29.702 --> 0:28:30.782
<v Speaker 2>you've even put them out?

0:28:31.542 --> 0:28:37.462
<v Speaker 3>Not really, We're pretty each episode is pretty on par

0:28:37.622 --> 0:28:41.302
<v Speaker 3>with another episode. Yeah, they all do pretty well. So

0:28:42.022 --> 0:28:45.262
<v Speaker 3>we don't really have an insight into this particular case.

0:28:46.422 --> 0:28:49.782
<v Speaker 3>We'll do better than this particular case. Nothing like that

0:28:49.782 --> 0:28:52.022
<v Speaker 3>that doesn't come that doesn't factor into the decision.

0:28:52.062 --> 0:28:53.342
<v Speaker 4>Meaning, are there.

0:28:53.182 --> 0:28:56.302
<v Speaker 2>Any episodes I know you've done over three hundred but

0:28:57.022 --> 0:28:58.302
<v Speaker 2>that you're particularly proud of.

0:28:59.982 --> 0:29:02.222
<v Speaker 3>But the ones that stand out to me would be

0:29:02.262 --> 0:29:08.062
<v Speaker 3>one like the unsolved murder of Britney Phillips, which is

0:29:08.102 --> 0:29:11.742
<v Speaker 3>a US case and I touched them earlier that unsolved

0:29:11.742 --> 0:29:16.142
<v Speaker 3>cases are the ones that are closest to me. And

0:29:16.342 --> 0:29:19.582
<v Speaker 3>Maggie Zingman, who is Brittany's mother, came across her story

0:29:20.102 --> 0:29:23.982
<v Speaker 3>in that she couldn't get any coverage for her daughter's

0:29:24.022 --> 0:29:28.302
<v Speaker 3>unsolved murder that happened in Tulsa, Oklahoma, And so she's

0:29:28.302 --> 0:29:33.062
<v Speaker 3>been driving around for fifteen eighteen years whatever it was

0:29:33.102 --> 0:29:36.542
<v Speaker 3>at the time when we actually covered the case. She's

0:29:36.542 --> 0:29:39.462
<v Speaker 3>got her car decked out in like a rap with

0:29:39.502 --> 0:29:43.022
<v Speaker 3>all the details of her daughter's crime and just driving around.

0:29:43.182 --> 0:29:47.542
<v Speaker 3>She's been to every state in the continental US multiple times,

0:29:47.662 --> 0:29:50.062
<v Speaker 3>just driving around. She calls a caravan to catch a killer,

0:29:50.182 --> 0:29:53.902
<v Speaker 3>just raising awareness, just you never know, someone might know

0:29:53.982 --> 0:29:58.222
<v Speaker 3>something somewhere. And despite that, she was unable to get

0:29:58.222 --> 0:30:02.062
<v Speaker 3>any sort of national coverage or anything. So we were

0:30:02.062 --> 0:30:04.742
<v Speaker 3>put in touch and we were able to cover that

0:30:04.742 --> 0:30:05.702
<v Speaker 3>story on Case File.

0:30:06.582 --> 0:30:07.942
<v Speaker 5>I forget when that was released.

0:30:07.982 --> 0:30:09.662
<v Speaker 3>It was a few years ago now, But to this day,

0:30:09.782 --> 0:30:12.822
<v Speaker 3>Maggie will still will email me and say she still

0:30:12.862 --> 0:30:16.262
<v Speaker 3>gets people emailing her because they've heard the Case File episode.

0:30:16.302 --> 0:30:20.422
<v Speaker 3>And there's been no sort of groundbreaking tips at this point,

0:30:20.462 --> 0:30:22.382
<v Speaker 3>but there's been a few things here and there, and

0:30:22.582 --> 0:30:24.462
<v Speaker 3>she's just so appreciative of that coverage.

0:30:24.502 --> 0:30:28.502
<v Speaker 5>So to me, that's something very worthwhile.

0:30:29.022 --> 0:30:31.622
<v Speaker 2>I find it so interesting that you worked closely with

0:30:31.902 --> 0:30:35.462
<v Speaker 2>a family member to create that script. I'm guessing do

0:30:35.502 --> 0:30:38.862
<v Speaker 2>you do that often? Do you have family members or

0:30:38.942 --> 0:30:42.182
<v Speaker 2>people that were close to the crime involved in the

0:30:42.182 --> 0:30:43.422
<v Speaker 2>crafting of the episode.

0:30:43.822 --> 0:30:46.662
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, not every episode, but it does definitely happen. And

0:30:46.862 --> 0:30:51.102
<v Speaker 3>I guess because we have that single storyteller style, we

0:30:51.142 --> 0:30:53.622
<v Speaker 3>don't include interview clips that might not be overly apparent

0:30:53.982 --> 0:30:58.302
<v Speaker 3>that we do that, but it does happen, Yeah, you

0:30:58.342 --> 0:31:01.062
<v Speaker 3>know often, will have. I mean, at this point, we

0:31:01.182 --> 0:31:04.422
<v Speaker 3>get unfortunately, way more emails than we could ever get

0:31:04.422 --> 0:31:09.702
<v Speaker 3>to for from family members or advocates or friends or

0:31:09.702 --> 0:31:13.382
<v Speaker 3>family who requesting us to cover cases. I wish I

0:31:13.382 --> 0:31:16.262
<v Speaker 3>could get to all of them, but it's just not

0:31:16.422 --> 0:31:17.582
<v Speaker 3>possible at this point.

0:31:18.302 --> 0:31:21.742
<v Speaker 2>Are there any stories that haunt you? Obviously every story

0:31:21.822 --> 0:31:23.422
<v Speaker 2>is usually horrible.

0:31:24.702 --> 0:31:28.222
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, for sure. I mean all the unsolved ones,

0:31:28.302 --> 0:31:30.142
<v Speaker 3>I mean they all haunt you. They will have an

0:31:30.142 --> 0:31:34.662
<v Speaker 3>effect at some level. The unsolved ones where we work

0:31:34.702 --> 0:31:40.822
<v Speaker 3>with family are particularly harder than others. I would say, yeah,

0:31:41.422 --> 0:31:43.142
<v Speaker 3>the Brittany Phillips one I just touched on. I was

0:31:43.182 --> 0:31:45.262
<v Speaker 3>lucky enough to meet Maggie in person last year at

0:31:45.302 --> 0:31:47.462
<v Speaker 3>Crime Con for the first time, so that was really

0:31:47.502 --> 0:31:50.662
<v Speaker 3>good to meet her in person. The series that I

0:31:50.702 --> 0:31:53.462
<v Speaker 3>released last year on the Case File Presents Platform Missing

0:31:53.502 --> 0:31:56.622
<v Speaker 3>Neam that I that took me over four years to

0:31:56.622 --> 0:32:01.102
<v Speaker 3>put together that series, So obviously that four years that

0:32:01.182 --> 0:32:01.902
<v Speaker 3>had an effect.

0:32:02.662 --> 0:32:02.862
<v Speaker 5>Yep.

0:32:03.502 --> 0:32:05.862
<v Speaker 2>It's so interesting because like at the start of the chat,

0:32:06.022 --> 0:32:08.382
<v Speaker 2>you were talking about, you know, seeing the books in

0:32:08.422 --> 0:32:12.902
<v Speaker 2>your aunties and being like, oh, yeah, true crime and

0:32:12.942 --> 0:32:16.382
<v Speaker 2>now it's you live breathe talk about it every day.

0:32:17.942 --> 0:32:19.182
<v Speaker 4>Does that have an effect on you?

0:32:20.782 --> 0:32:21.502
<v Speaker 5>I guess it does.

0:32:22.742 --> 0:32:25.702
<v Speaker 3>Obviously has because I can't consume any true crime stuff

0:32:25.702 --> 0:32:29.462
<v Speaker 3>anymore outside of what's required for work. So people might

0:32:29.462 --> 0:32:32.622
<v Speaker 3>be talking about the latest Netflix series or whatever, there's.

0:32:32.822 --> 0:32:34.742
<v Speaker 5>I haven't watched any of them. I've got no idea.

0:32:35.022 --> 0:32:38.262
<v Speaker 3>It's just not something that I can do outside of

0:32:38.382 --> 0:32:42.142
<v Speaker 3>what's required for work now, so I've got to seek

0:32:42.182 --> 0:32:46.022
<v Speaker 3>other sort of avenues to unwind and stuff. But yeah,

0:32:46.102 --> 0:32:49.262
<v Speaker 3>so I guess it's hard to say. I guess when

0:32:49.262 --> 0:32:51.782
<v Speaker 3>you're living every day.

0:32:51.862 --> 0:32:55.662
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I can still watch the Netflix shows and I

0:32:55.742 --> 0:32:57.422
<v Speaker 2>live and breathe true crime every day.

0:32:57.422 --> 0:32:59.822
<v Speaker 4>So I think it just is different people.

0:33:00.342 --> 0:33:02.502
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, it just depends on There's no sort of right

0:33:02.622 --> 0:33:03.302
<v Speaker 5>or wrong answer.

0:33:03.582 --> 0:33:06.862
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, has your research ever I know you were talking

0:33:06.902 --> 0:33:09.262
<v Speaker 2>about Britney's moum, but has it ever kind of led

0:33:09.262 --> 0:33:12.822
<v Speaker 2>to a break through or helped an investigation?

0:33:13.982 --> 0:33:15.782
<v Speaker 3>I don't think so, not that I know of, Like

0:33:15.862 --> 0:33:18.422
<v Speaker 3>that Case File episode hasn't directly led to a case

0:33:18.502 --> 0:33:22.262
<v Speaker 3>being solved. Obviously, we've covered unsolved cases that have then

0:33:22.462 --> 0:33:25.142
<v Speaker 3>become solved, not because of the case fil coverage, but

0:33:25.222 --> 0:33:28.462
<v Speaker 3>that has happened. We've definitely received tips over the years,

0:33:29.022 --> 0:33:31.182
<v Speaker 3>you know, I've had tips come directly to me and

0:33:31.582 --> 0:33:35.302
<v Speaker 3>I'm like, I can't I'm not an investigative agency, Like

0:33:35.342 --> 0:33:38.542
<v Speaker 3>I can't do anything with this, and sort of encourage

0:33:38.582 --> 0:33:41.742
<v Speaker 3>those people to contact the relevant law enforcement agency.

0:33:42.582 --> 0:33:44.422
<v Speaker 2>That's a lot of pressure on you though, as well,

0:33:44.462 --> 0:33:47.222
<v Speaker 2>getting tips through your email and you're like, I'm just

0:33:47.302 --> 0:33:48.182
<v Speaker 2>toasting a podcast.

0:33:48.302 --> 0:33:49.782
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, yeah, I mean.

0:33:51.782 --> 0:33:53.622
<v Speaker 3>I get it's tough too because a lot of these

0:33:53.622 --> 0:33:56.062
<v Speaker 3>cases are decades old, and so from the point of

0:33:56.142 --> 0:33:58.142
<v Speaker 3>view of the person like, well, the police don't care,

0:33:58.182 --> 0:34:00.862
<v Speaker 3>they're not doing anything. That's probably their perception. Whether that's

0:34:00.902 --> 0:34:03.062
<v Speaker 3>the truth or not, I don't know, it could be different.

0:34:03.142 --> 0:34:06.702
<v Speaker 3>But if there is ever something I could actually do

0:34:06.822 --> 0:34:08.502
<v Speaker 3>to help a case, of course I would do it.

0:34:08.542 --> 0:34:11.582
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, I think I definitely don't want to be

0:34:11.622 --> 0:34:13.942
<v Speaker 3>overreaching and trying to take on the role of an

0:34:13.942 --> 0:34:17.582
<v Speaker 3>investigative agency. I think the first port of call is

0:34:17.622 --> 0:34:18.102
<v Speaker 3>the police.

0:34:18.942 --> 0:34:24.022
<v Speaker 2>And yeah, you've no doubt watched the True Crime Space

0:34:24.302 --> 0:34:27.422
<v Speaker 2>explode over the last nine years. I mean, we're here,

0:34:27.462 --> 0:34:31.782
<v Speaker 2>we've popped up and plenty of other podcasts. Do you

0:34:31.862 --> 0:34:33.942
<v Speaker 2>fixate on the charts? I mean you're usually at the

0:34:33.982 --> 0:34:35.462
<v Speaker 2>top of them, so you don't need to have to worry.

0:34:35.582 --> 0:34:40.222
<v Speaker 2>But is it interesting watching it explode and all these

0:34:40.342 --> 0:34:44.142
<v Speaker 2>new podcasts in your kind of space come up?

0:34:44.342 --> 0:34:44.582
<v Speaker 5>Yeah?

0:34:44.662 --> 0:34:48.342
<v Speaker 3>It still remains one of the most popular, I believe

0:34:48.542 --> 0:34:51.462
<v Speaker 3>of the podcast categories, and there's been all sorts of

0:34:51.542 --> 0:34:55.182
<v Speaker 3>shows that have popped up since and continue to be popular.

0:34:55.302 --> 0:34:58.422
<v Speaker 3>And yeah, obviously there was In Australia we have the

0:34:58.462 --> 0:35:01.782
<v Speaker 3>Teacher's Pet which has led to a result, So there's

0:35:01.822 --> 0:35:03.542
<v Speaker 3>been a lot that has happened over the years.

0:35:03.582 --> 0:35:07.062
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, why do you think Case File still dominates all

0:35:07.062 --> 0:35:07.742
<v Speaker 2>these years later?

0:35:07.862 --> 0:35:09.702
<v Speaker 5>That's a great question. I have no idea.

0:35:11.302 --> 0:35:13.422
<v Speaker 3>It's almost like every day I wake up, I'm like,

0:35:13.542 --> 0:35:18.302
<v Speaker 3>is this the day where everyone stops listening? Or it's hard?

0:35:19.462 --> 0:35:23.862
<v Speaker 3>It doesn't seem real. And it's pretty rare to have

0:35:23.982 --> 0:35:26.062
<v Speaker 3>been for a show to be at the top for

0:35:26.102 --> 0:35:29.902
<v Speaker 3>so long too. I mean, obviously we have regular early episodes,

0:35:29.982 --> 0:35:33.302
<v Speaker 3>so those bigger sort of investigative shows like Your Teachers

0:35:33.342 --> 0:35:36.622
<v Speaker 3>pattern stuff that are limited run, they can't say the

0:35:36.662 --> 0:35:42.222
<v Speaker 3>top because they're not there. Yeah, they're short runs, so

0:35:42.262 --> 0:35:46.342
<v Speaker 3>we have that to our advantage. But yeah, I don't know,

0:35:46.382 --> 0:35:49.382
<v Speaker 3>and we don't take it for granted. We continue just

0:35:49.422 --> 0:35:52.742
<v Speaker 3>to put our heads down, work really hard and try

0:35:52.862 --> 0:35:55.942
<v Speaker 3>to continually improve the episodes and what we're doing, and

0:35:56.942 --> 0:35:59.302
<v Speaker 3>as long as people keep listening, we will keep doing it.

0:35:59.582 --> 0:36:02.342
<v Speaker 2>Well, you've obviously met some of your audience in real life.

0:36:02.462 --> 0:36:05.422
<v Speaker 2>You've done a few in person chats, but do you

0:36:05.462 --> 0:36:07.742
<v Speaker 2>get a lot of feedback from audience of where they're

0:36:07.782 --> 0:36:08.342
<v Speaker 2>listening and.

0:36:10.102 --> 0:36:11.102
<v Speaker 4>Why love the show.

0:36:12.542 --> 0:36:16.302
<v Speaker 3>The most common feedback that I have gotten from people

0:36:16.622 --> 0:36:19.222
<v Speaker 3>in both in person people email in and write comments

0:36:19.222 --> 0:36:22.982
<v Speaker 3>and stuff, is just they appreciate the no nonsense storytelling,

0:36:23.022 --> 0:36:27.662
<v Speaker 3>I guess, the empathetic storytelling. There's no banter or chit chat,

0:36:27.702 --> 0:36:30.662
<v Speaker 3>so I guess they like that about our style as well.

0:36:32.062 --> 0:36:34.902
<v Speaker 3>And just what I touched on before that it's not

0:36:35.022 --> 0:36:39.702
<v Speaker 3>just we're not just telling stories about gratuitous violences. Generally

0:36:40.182 --> 0:36:44.702
<v Speaker 3>something else to it, some sort of impact somewhere, judicial system,

0:36:44.942 --> 0:36:49.982
<v Speaker 3>criminal justice system, police whatever. And yeah, that's I guess

0:36:49.982 --> 0:36:53.142
<v Speaker 3>the most the most common feedback that I've gotten.

0:36:53.502 --> 0:36:56.022
<v Speaker 2>I have a feeling you accompany many people on their

0:36:56.102 --> 0:36:57.342
<v Speaker 2>road trips.

0:36:57.462 --> 0:36:59.902
<v Speaker 3>In terms of where they listen. Yeah, yeah, road trips

0:37:00.182 --> 0:37:03.742
<v Speaker 3>is very popular. Gym walks runs, that sort of thing

0:37:03.822 --> 0:37:05.262
<v Speaker 3>is very popular as well.

0:37:06.062 --> 0:37:07.742
<v Speaker 5>And it's funny.

0:37:07.742 --> 0:37:13.022
<v Speaker 3>Actually, Anthony the other audio bridge was at a friend's

0:37:13.022 --> 0:37:17.782
<v Speaker 3>house recently and he's popped out of the car and

0:37:17.822 --> 0:37:18.742
<v Speaker 3>he's heard my voice.

0:37:19.662 --> 0:37:20.782
<v Speaker 5>He's like, what's going on here?

0:37:21.302 --> 0:37:23.462
<v Speaker 3>And it turns out a neighbor of his friend was

0:37:23.502 --> 0:37:29.502
<v Speaker 3>in the garage doing a workout and had Case File laring. So, yeah,

0:37:30.142 --> 0:37:32.182
<v Speaker 3>that's never happened to me. I've never bumped into anyone

0:37:32.222 --> 0:37:34.742
<v Speaker 3>listening to case File really, no, well.

0:37:34.622 --> 0:37:35.222
<v Speaker 5>Not that I know of.

0:37:36.022 --> 0:37:38.342
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you haven't seen it on their phone. I've done

0:37:38.382 --> 0:37:40.702
<v Speaker 2>that a few times where I've seen our podcast.

0:37:40.382 --> 0:37:43.342
<v Speaker 5>On someone's phone. Yeah, no, no, never.

0:37:44.102 --> 0:37:48.062
<v Speaker 2>Because your voice is very familiar now, like you've done

0:37:48.102 --> 0:37:52.542
<v Speaker 2>over three hundred episodes, and you didn't have any audio training.

0:37:52.262 --> 0:37:53.142
<v Speaker 4>Did you.

0:37:53.182 --> 0:37:56.822
<v Speaker 2>No, But I think most people that listen would be

0:37:56.862 --> 0:37:59.342
<v Speaker 2>able to recognize your voice in a lineup.

0:38:00.182 --> 0:38:04.102
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, maybe, but some people don't know. At an event

0:38:04.142 --> 0:38:07.262
<v Speaker 3>only last week and I was talking to someone and

0:38:07.422 --> 0:38:09.622
<v Speaker 3>I mentioned I was from case File. There was a

0:38:09.622 --> 0:38:12.942
<v Speaker 3>podcast event and they were like, oh, a famous voice,

0:38:12.982 --> 0:38:16.502
<v Speaker 3>so who does the voice? And so they had no

0:38:16.582 --> 0:38:19.982
<v Speaker 3>idea that it was. I'd say that's me, and they

0:38:19.982 --> 0:38:23.862
<v Speaker 3>were like, oh, you sound very sefferent in real life.

0:38:24.182 --> 0:38:26.862
<v Speaker 4>So you do tell people that you come across that you.

0:38:26.782 --> 0:38:30.862
<v Speaker 3>Are not everyone, but in that environment, I was okay

0:38:32.182 --> 0:38:35.022
<v Speaker 3>to talk about it that particular event, but it's not

0:38:35.062 --> 0:38:37.782
<v Speaker 3>something or I just freely disclosed and day to day

0:38:37.822 --> 0:38:39.102
<v Speaker 3>on the street or anything like that.

0:38:39.262 --> 0:38:45.862
<v Speaker 2>No, next I ask the anonymous host of case File

0:38:46.062 --> 0:38:48.382
<v Speaker 2>who he will reveal his identity to.

0:38:52.382 --> 0:38:53.062
<v Speaker 4>Nerdy again.

0:38:53.262 --> 0:38:55.502
<v Speaker 2>But I was at the Australian Podcast Awards and I

0:38:55.542 --> 0:38:57.942
<v Speaker 2>hear you were too. I was, but I wouldn't have

0:38:58.062 --> 0:38:59.582
<v Speaker 2>known it because I didn't know what you learn.

0:38:59.622 --> 0:39:02.062
<v Speaker 5>I was just lurking in the shadows at the back

0:39:02.102 --> 0:39:02.702
<v Speaker 5>of the room there.

0:39:02.902 --> 0:39:06.022
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but you don't well, I don't remember you getting up.

0:39:06.062 --> 0:39:08.822
<v Speaker 2>Case File Presents at least got an award that night.

0:39:08.862 --> 0:39:11.502
<v Speaker 5>From memory, we were nominated, didn't didn't win.

0:39:11.702 --> 0:39:13.062
<v Speaker 4>Would you have gotten up if you won?

0:39:14.022 --> 0:39:14.982
<v Speaker 5>No?

0:39:14.982 --> 0:39:17.582
<v Speaker 3>No, I think members of the a cast team were

0:39:17.622 --> 0:39:19.102
<v Speaker 3>going to step in and do that for us.

0:39:19.822 --> 0:39:20.662
<v Speaker 5>So that was easy.

0:39:20.702 --> 0:39:24.742
<v Speaker 3>Street and Troubled Warders were both nominated in different categories.

0:39:24.902 --> 0:39:28.182
<v Speaker 2>So you are still very careful in terms of like

0:39:28.262 --> 0:39:30.542
<v Speaker 2>you'll do certain things, like you'll stand in front of

0:39:30.542 --> 0:39:33.382
<v Speaker 2>an intimate audience, but you won't get up on a

0:39:33.382 --> 0:39:34.942
<v Speaker 2>stage in a podcasting awards.

0:39:36.182 --> 0:39:36.422
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

0:39:37.022 --> 0:39:37.502
<v Speaker 5>I don't know why.

0:39:37.502 --> 0:39:41.902
<v Speaker 3>It probably seems a bit contradictory. No, it clever and

0:39:41.942 --> 0:39:43.662
<v Speaker 3>in saying that, if I was at that award show

0:39:43.702 --> 0:39:47.502
<v Speaker 3>and bumped into you and you introduce yourself, Like at

0:39:47.542 --> 0:39:51.342
<v Speaker 3>that sort of environment, I would have said who I was?

0:39:51.462 --> 0:39:54.622
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well i'll recognize you now now you will. Yes,

0:39:56.062 --> 0:39:58.942
<v Speaker 2>Where do you think the future of podcasting is going?

0:39:59.022 --> 0:40:01.422
<v Speaker 2>Is someone that's been in the world for so long

0:40:01.502 --> 0:40:03.502
<v Speaker 2>because it is so saturated.

0:40:02.942 --> 0:40:07.062
<v Speaker 3>Now, I think from what I read and see, everything

0:40:07.142 --> 0:40:11.982
<v Speaker 3>seems to be pointing towards video. Videos come a very

0:40:12.022 --> 0:40:15.222
<v Speaker 3>big thing, which I don't know what kind of Well,

0:40:15.422 --> 0:40:18.222
<v Speaker 3>video is not podcasting, though, it's a different thing.

0:40:18.382 --> 0:40:20.262
<v Speaker 4>You'll have to get a good silhouette.

0:40:20.382 --> 0:40:23.862
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, well, we've just made changes to our YouTube channel

0:40:23.902 --> 0:40:26.222
<v Speaker 3>so we release on YouTube as well. So as of

0:40:26.302 --> 0:40:29.862
<v Speaker 3>the first episode we've released this year, we've incorporated sort

0:40:29.862 --> 0:40:32.942
<v Speaker 3>of pitches and maps and different things that will overlay

0:40:32.982 --> 0:40:35.822
<v Speaker 3>on the screen and it's kind of like an animated

0:40:36.222 --> 0:40:40.582
<v Speaker 3>studio silhouette of a person recording. So we've made some tweaks,

0:40:41.142 --> 0:40:42.942
<v Speaker 3>leaning into the video a bit more, doing what we

0:40:42.982 --> 0:40:46.102
<v Speaker 3>can because obviously we are limited. But yeah, it's a

0:40:46.182 --> 0:40:49.622
<v Speaker 3>very different landscape now than was to when Case File started.

0:40:51.142 --> 0:40:53.862
<v Speaker 3>I find it now when we release case File present shows.

0:40:53.862 --> 0:40:58.022
<v Speaker 3>Sometimes even though we have a massive audience to advertise

0:40:58.102 --> 0:41:03.702
<v Speaker 3>that too, sometimes it can not take it's just very

0:41:03.742 --> 0:41:07.062
<v Speaker 3>hard to break through now. I think there's so many

0:41:07.182 --> 0:41:12.902
<v Speaker 3>established shows launching a new show much tougher. Not to

0:41:12.902 --> 0:41:14.582
<v Speaker 3>say it can't be done, of course it can be,

0:41:15.262 --> 0:41:17.622
<v Speaker 3>it's just much tougher now. I think the barrier to

0:41:17.782 --> 0:41:19.542
<v Speaker 3>entry is a little bit higher now.

0:41:19.702 --> 0:41:23.862
<v Speaker 2>So if you were to try and release your episode

0:41:23.902 --> 0:41:28.022
<v Speaker 2>one from twenty sixteen now and do what you did now.

0:41:27.822 --> 0:41:30.262
<v Speaker 3>I think that would be what the original It would

0:41:30.302 --> 0:41:33.022
<v Speaker 3>turn out to what the original thought was three episodes,

0:41:33.022 --> 0:41:35.502
<v Speaker 3>and I'd be back to work. Yeah, I couldn't see

0:41:35.502 --> 0:41:38.102
<v Speaker 3>it taking off now, just with how bad the audio

0:41:38.302 --> 0:41:40.942
<v Speaker 3>was as well. So I think there's a much higher

0:41:42.142 --> 0:41:46.742
<v Speaker 3>level of quality now audio production and just the product,

0:41:46.742 --> 0:41:48.342
<v Speaker 3>the shows themselves, the content.

0:41:49.102 --> 0:41:49.662
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:41:49.822 --> 0:41:50.742
<v Speaker 4>Do you still love it?

0:41:51.582 --> 0:41:52.942
<v Speaker 5>Yeah? Yeah still.

0:41:54.982 --> 0:41:56.942
<v Speaker 3>As I said, I wake up every day just so

0:41:57.782 --> 0:42:00.462
<v Speaker 3>I can't believe that the show has the audience that

0:42:00.542 --> 0:42:02.542
<v Speaker 3>it has, and that I get to work with such

0:42:02.582 --> 0:42:05.742
<v Speaker 3>a talented group of people and people listen, and that

0:42:05.822 --> 0:42:06.502
<v Speaker 3>we get to do this.

0:42:06.622 --> 0:42:08.422
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, very fortunate.

0:42:08.822 --> 0:42:12.302
<v Speaker 2>So you've just come back from summer break in February,

0:42:12.782 --> 0:42:13.382
<v Speaker 2>lucky bugger.

0:42:13.742 --> 0:42:16.302
<v Speaker 3>Yes, although that is a bit of a misconception. I

0:42:16.502 --> 0:42:18.862
<v Speaker 3>like to clear up that we've been bombarded with one

0:42:18.902 --> 0:42:21.342
<v Speaker 3>star review, so we've taken too long off. I can

0:42:21.342 --> 0:42:25.102
<v Speaker 3>assure everyone we have been working very hard. I mean,

0:42:25.382 --> 0:42:27.542
<v Speaker 3>of course we had two weeks off over the Christmas

0:42:27.542 --> 0:42:29.982
<v Speaker 3>New Year period itself, but as soon as the last

0:42:30.022 --> 0:42:32.542
<v Speaker 3>episode came out last year, we would have wrapped that

0:42:32.622 --> 0:42:34.702
<v Speaker 3>up in October, so as soon as that was sort

0:42:34.742 --> 0:42:36.822
<v Speaker 3>of done and recorded, might not have been released yet,

0:42:36.862 --> 0:42:38.462
<v Speaker 3>but we were straight onto twenty twenty five.

0:42:38.942 --> 0:42:41.102
<v Speaker 4>So listeners rest assured you were working.

0:42:41.182 --> 0:42:44.062
<v Speaker 3>You just went related to Yeah, we sort of need

0:42:44.062 --> 0:42:46.542
<v Speaker 3>that three month lead in just to get ready for

0:42:47.102 --> 0:42:50.822
<v Speaker 3>the new year, because otherwise it can In past years

0:42:50.822 --> 0:42:53.622
<v Speaker 3>it's just been a nightmare. We've barely been days ahead.

0:42:53.742 --> 0:42:55.702
<v Speaker 3>Like I've finished recording an episode, got to get it

0:42:55.702 --> 0:42:58.182
<v Speaker 3>to Mike. He's got three days to put the audio production,

0:42:58.262 --> 0:43:01.542
<v Speaker 3>get it out and that's not a good way to operate. Stressful,

0:43:02.022 --> 0:43:03.422
<v Speaker 3>so we try and keep ahead of that.

0:43:03.502 --> 0:43:05.982
<v Speaker 2>Now, So what can we expect. What are some of

0:43:05.982 --> 0:43:07.462
<v Speaker 2>the episodes that you have coming up?

0:43:08.022 --> 0:43:12.622
<v Speaker 3>Listeners can expect I think more of what they have

0:43:12.742 --> 0:43:15.342
<v Speaker 3>come to know and love about Case File, as varied

0:43:15.422 --> 0:43:19.022
<v Speaker 3>cases from Australia from around the world. There's all sorts

0:43:19.062 --> 0:43:24.222
<v Speaker 3>of different cases more recent older. We are launching with

0:43:24.262 --> 0:43:28.622
<v Speaker 3>the two parter on the Night Caller, which was the

0:43:28.662 --> 0:43:34.142
<v Speaker 3>serial offender Eric Agacook in Perth, Western Australia, and I

0:43:34.182 --> 0:43:37.902
<v Speaker 3>think what's interesting about that case is just such a

0:43:37.902 --> 0:43:39.982
<v Speaker 3>different time when that was happening, and you have this

0:43:40.102 --> 0:43:45.942
<v Speaker 3>prolific serial offender just wreaking havoc across the city, and

0:43:46.062 --> 0:43:48.582
<v Speaker 3>yet they didn't put it together that it was the

0:43:48.622 --> 0:43:53.782
<v Speaker 3>same offender. I mean, there's multiple wrongful convictions despite a

0:43:53.862 --> 0:43:57.382
<v Speaker 3>confession from Eric A. Gocook in this case after he

0:43:57.422 --> 0:44:00.502
<v Speaker 3>was eventually caught and he confessed, and they put together, oh,

0:44:00.542 --> 0:44:03.582
<v Speaker 3>this was all the same guy. There's people sitting in

0:44:03.582 --> 0:44:06.182
<v Speaker 3>prison for his crimes and despite a full detailed confession

0:44:06.182 --> 0:44:09.782
<v Speaker 3>that it still took a while for those guys to

0:44:09.782 --> 0:44:12.262
<v Speaker 3>get out. I just's certain things about that case that

0:44:12.342 --> 0:44:13.062
<v Speaker 3>blow my mind.

0:44:13.862 --> 0:44:16.782
<v Speaker 4>Do you ever struggle to hold back your opinion in

0:44:16.822 --> 0:44:17.622
<v Speaker 4>your script writing?

0:44:17.782 --> 0:44:17.982
<v Speaker 5>Oh?

0:44:18.102 --> 0:44:21.662
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, I have plenty of opinions on those cases,

0:44:22.222 --> 0:44:24.942
<v Speaker 3>but yeah, very mindful that that's not what case follows about.

0:44:25.222 --> 0:44:26.742
<v Speaker 5>It's going to remain neutral.

0:44:26.902 --> 0:44:30.222
<v Speaker 3>Just tell it, just tell the facts, And sometimes I

0:44:30.222 --> 0:44:33.662
<v Speaker 3>think people forget that. So like if we are very

0:44:33.662 --> 0:44:37.302
<v Speaker 3>common gripe for listeners and that we'll get emails about

0:44:37.422 --> 0:44:40.342
<v Speaker 3>is about the use of polygraph tests. So if we

0:44:40.502 --> 0:44:43.422
<v Speaker 3>mention in a case like you know, certain suspect was

0:44:43.422 --> 0:44:45.582
<v Speaker 3>brought in given a polygraph test and passed and failed

0:44:45.822 --> 0:44:49.702
<v Speaker 3>or whatever, people write in like furious, this is junk science.

0:44:49.742 --> 0:44:56.942
<v Speaker 3>It's been debunked. We're not advocating, just that's what happened. Yeah,

0:44:56.982 --> 0:45:01.382
<v Speaker 3>So even though we don't give opinions, people can sometimes

0:45:01.462 --> 0:45:03.942
<v Speaker 3>hear things and think that we are. But yeah, just

0:45:04.142 --> 0:45:07.822
<v Speaker 3>keep it neutral. This is what happened. And that's case

0:45:07.822 --> 0:45:08.622
<v Speaker 3>file basically.

0:45:09.542 --> 0:45:11.342
<v Speaker 2>And I know you said you can secret from your

0:45:11.342 --> 0:45:13.702
<v Speaker 2>friends and family, but I'm assuming they know what you do.

0:45:13.782 --> 0:45:15.182
<v Speaker 4>Now what do they think they know?

0:45:15.382 --> 0:45:19.542
<v Speaker 3>Now? Yeah, Yeah, they're pretty sort of blown away by

0:45:19.582 --> 0:45:22.782
<v Speaker 3>it as well. Some of them can't believe it. They

0:45:22.822 --> 0:45:23.742
<v Speaker 3>hear my voice a lot.

0:45:24.542 --> 0:45:25.182
<v Speaker 4>Do they listen?

0:45:26.502 --> 0:45:30.502
<v Speaker 3>Some do, Some don't, Yeah, some sort of. Some are

0:45:30.502 --> 0:45:32.742
<v Speaker 3>turned off by my voice actually because they can't take

0:45:32.782 --> 0:45:35.822
<v Speaker 3>it seriously because they know it's me, you know. Some an'

0:45:35.862 --> 0:45:38.422
<v Speaker 3>into true crime and stuff like that. Yeah, but quite

0:45:38.422 --> 0:45:39.822
<v Speaker 3>a few friends and family do listen.

0:45:39.942 --> 0:45:42.702
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Well, thank you for coming into the studio. I

0:45:42.702 --> 0:45:45.302
<v Speaker 2>know it was a bit of a treck for you.

0:45:45.662 --> 0:45:47.062
<v Speaker 2>That's not giving too much away, is it.

0:45:47.382 --> 0:45:50.622
<v Speaker 5>No bad traffic, very bad traffic.

0:45:51.062 --> 0:45:58.262
<v Speaker 2>Everyone can keep listening to you, but just call you Casey.

0:45:59.422 --> 0:46:01.742
<v Speaker 4>Thanks to Casey for telling us his story.

0:46:02.022 --> 0:46:05.022
<v Speaker 2>True Crime Conversations is a Mum of Meer podcast hosted

0:46:05.062 --> 0:46:08.302
<v Speaker 2>and produced by me Jemma Bath and Tarlie Blackman, with

0:46:08.382 --> 0:46:10.062
<v Speaker 2>audio design by Jacob Brown.

0:46:10.822 --> 0:46:13.142
<v Speaker 4>Thanks so much for listening. I'll be back next week

0:46:13.342 --> 0:46:15.142
<v Speaker 4>with another True Crime Conversation.