WEBVTT - Two Weddings & A Guilt Trip

0:00:10.327 --> 0:00:13.047
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to a MoMA Mea podcast.

0:00:13.727 --> 0:00:16.767
<v Speaker 2>Mamma Mea acknowledges the traditional owners of land and waters

0:00:16.807 --> 0:00:23.727
<v Speaker 2>that this podcast is recorded on Hello and welcome to

0:00:23.807 --> 0:00:26.767
<v Speaker 2>MoMA Mia out Loud. It's what women are actually talking about.

0:00:26.847 --> 0:00:30.407
<v Speaker 2>On Monday, the third of June. I'm Holly Wainwright, I'm.

0:00:30.207 --> 0:00:33.847
<v Speaker 3>MEA Friedman and I'm Jemma Bath filling in for Jesse Stevens.

0:00:33.927 --> 0:00:36.087
<v Speaker 4>I usually host one of our other podcasts.

0:00:35.727 --> 0:00:39.007
<v Speaker 2>Through Crime Conversations. Welcome Jane you, thanks for having me.

0:00:39.087 --> 0:00:40.767
<v Speaker 2>We're going to be hearing you a few times while

0:00:40.847 --> 0:00:45.287
<v Speaker 2>Jesse's away. Yes on the show today, the uninvited guests

0:00:45.327 --> 0:00:46.847
<v Speaker 2>at Britney Higgins's.

0:00:46.367 --> 0:00:48.967
<v Speaker 5>Wedding were the paparazzi helicopters.

0:00:49.407 --> 0:00:53.007
<v Speaker 2>Also why you're seeing embarrassing teen photos of very famous

0:00:53.007 --> 0:00:56.487
<v Speaker 2>Australians all over your Instagram and why we love women

0:00:56.527 --> 0:00:58.207
<v Speaker 2>supporting women until that.

0:00:58.207 --> 0:01:02.527
<v Speaker 5>Woman is Angelina Jolie. But first, mea Friedman. In case

0:01:02.567 --> 0:01:04.647
<v Speaker 5>you missed it, on this podcast, we like to stay

0:01:04.687 --> 0:01:07.047
<v Speaker 5>across what's happening with very old men, and in the

0:01:07.087 --> 0:01:09.967
<v Speaker 5>past few days there is some exciting breaking old news,

0:01:10.367 --> 0:01:12.487
<v Speaker 5>both happy and sad for the old men in question.

0:01:12.687 --> 0:01:15.287
<v Speaker 5>First of all, ninety three year old Rupert Murdoch got

0:01:15.287 --> 0:01:18.407
<v Speaker 5>married for the fifth time, and seventy seven year old

0:01:18.447 --> 0:01:21.767
<v Speaker 5>Donald Trump is officially a criminal, having been found guilty

0:01:22.167 --> 0:01:24.487
<v Speaker 5>on all thirty four charges in one of several criminal

0:01:24.487 --> 0:01:27.327
<v Speaker 5>cases that could send him to prison. Thank God, Jemma

0:01:27.367 --> 0:01:29.567
<v Speaker 5>Barth is here to break this down, because jam you

0:01:29.607 --> 0:01:32.847
<v Speaker 5>are also the news editor at Mama Mia. Who is

0:01:32.967 --> 0:01:35.567
<v Speaker 5>the lucky lady who will get to be stepmother to

0:01:35.727 --> 0:01:39.567
<v Speaker 5>children almost her own age? And will Donald Trump go

0:01:39.607 --> 0:01:41.847
<v Speaker 5>to jail? Please God say yes? And can he still

0:01:41.847 --> 0:01:43.407
<v Speaker 5>become president? Please God say no.

0:01:43.687 --> 0:01:47.087
<v Speaker 3>Elena Zukhova is the lucky lady who has married into

0:01:47.087 --> 0:01:49.447
<v Speaker 3>the Murdoch family. She is sixty seven. She is a

0:01:49.487 --> 0:01:54.287
<v Speaker 3>retired Russian molecular biologist, which I think is pretty damn cool.

0:01:54.287 --> 0:01:57.007
<v Speaker 2>Well, that's impressive, but I'm not buying that she's lucky

0:01:57.007 --> 0:02:01.207
<v Speaker 2>to be marrying into the has nobody watched succession around

0:02:01.247 --> 0:02:01.647
<v Speaker 2>this date.

0:02:02.367 --> 0:02:04.687
<v Speaker 3>She met Murdoch at a party hosted by one of

0:02:04.767 --> 0:02:08.167
<v Speaker 3>his ex wives and they've been together since last year,

0:02:08.287 --> 0:02:10.367
<v Speaker 3>short engagement, happily married.

0:02:10.607 --> 0:02:12.687
<v Speaker 5>Why does he have a better social life than me?

0:02:12.807 --> 0:02:15.087
<v Speaker 5>And he's ninety three? I can't remember the last time

0:02:15.087 --> 0:02:17.407
<v Speaker 5>I went to a party, i'd met someone new and excited.

0:02:17.407 --> 0:02:18.607
<v Speaker 5>I met a new spouse.

0:02:18.647 --> 0:02:20.967
<v Speaker 2>The number one question or people always ask is what's

0:02:21.007 --> 0:02:23.487
<v Speaker 2>with the weddings? Group like, we're all very happy that

0:02:23.567 --> 0:02:25.767
<v Speaker 2>you still have a vital and interesting love life.

0:02:26.127 --> 0:02:26.807
<v Speaker 5>We're fine with.

0:02:26.767 --> 0:02:28.407
<v Speaker 4>That, but what's with the weddings?

0:02:28.447 --> 0:02:31.207
<v Speaker 2>The kids must be all the time just being like, dad,

0:02:31.527 --> 0:02:32.727
<v Speaker 2>do you have to put a ring on it?

0:02:32.767 --> 0:02:35.687
<v Speaker 5>Don't you think? I was quite shocked by the photos

0:02:35.687 --> 0:02:38.047
<v Speaker 5>in how old he looked. He went through a phase

0:02:38.087 --> 0:02:41.127
<v Speaker 5>when a couple of wives ago with Wendy Deng where

0:02:41.567 --> 0:02:45.047
<v Speaker 5>she made him dye his hair like mahogany, that funny

0:02:45.047 --> 0:02:47.887
<v Speaker 5>color that men dye their hair sometimes a hole. You

0:02:47.927 --> 0:02:50.687
<v Speaker 5>were the one that suggested a few wives ago also

0:02:50.927 --> 0:02:53.487
<v Speaker 5>that the reason he keeps getting engaged and getting married

0:02:53.687 --> 0:02:57.967
<v Speaker 5>is because it means that you can put really clear

0:02:58.007 --> 0:03:01.127
<v Speaker 5>parameters around the money. So no doubt there's a strict

0:03:01.127 --> 0:03:04.247
<v Speaker 5>prenuptial whereas if he's just you know, having one night

0:03:04.287 --> 0:03:08.807
<v Speaker 5>stands and having a complication situationship, it can get very

0:03:08.807 --> 0:03:10.207
<v Speaker 5>complicated financially.

0:03:10.287 --> 0:03:12.207
<v Speaker 2>I think that's probably exactly it, and it would be

0:03:12.287 --> 0:03:13.927
<v Speaker 2>keeping lawyers very busy.

0:03:14.007 --> 0:03:15.287
<v Speaker 1>I just think the man likes a party.

0:03:15.367 --> 0:03:17.807
<v Speaker 5>He loves love guys, he loves love. What about that

0:03:17.847 --> 0:03:19.647
<v Speaker 5>Trump man? H Trump?

0:03:19.767 --> 0:03:23.607
<v Speaker 3>Okay, so last week we found out that Trump was

0:03:23.647 --> 0:03:27.167
<v Speaker 3>guilty of thirty four counts of so many, so many

0:03:27.207 --> 0:03:30.567
<v Speaker 3>counts of falsifying business records.

0:03:30.687 --> 0:03:31.847
<v Speaker 1>What that actually means.

0:03:31.687 --> 0:03:35.287
<v Speaker 4>Is he covered up the affair he had.

0:03:35.087 --> 0:03:37.607
<v Speaker 3>With Stormy Daniels. It wasn't that he had an affair.

0:03:37.647 --> 0:03:40.447
<v Speaker 3>It wasn't that he gave her hush money. It was

0:03:40.487 --> 0:03:43.647
<v Speaker 3>the fact that he hid the hush money and falsified records.

0:03:43.647 --> 0:03:45.727
<v Speaker 2>We had an affair, paid her off to be quiet,

0:03:45.767 --> 0:03:46.887
<v Speaker 2>and then tried to cover it up.

0:03:46.927 --> 0:03:48.447
<v Speaker 3>And then it was to cover up that got him

0:03:48.607 --> 0:03:51.007
<v Speaker 3>exactly because he only paid her off when he was

0:03:51.087 --> 0:03:54.607
<v Speaker 3>running for president. It's not like after they slept together.

0:03:55.127 --> 0:03:58.087
<v Speaker 3>If your eyes are glazing about all these court cases

0:03:58.127 --> 0:04:01.407
<v Speaker 3>and convictions and charges, the other time he was found

0:04:01.407 --> 0:04:04.767
<v Speaker 3>guilty was a few months ago, and that was in

0:04:04.807 --> 0:04:08.687
<v Speaker 3>a case about being a rapist, a civil case brought

0:04:08.767 --> 0:04:12.607
<v Speaker 3>by Jen Carroll, who she says Trump raped.

0:04:12.247 --> 0:04:15.247
<v Speaker 5>Her in a change room at Bergdoff's. I think it was.

0:04:15.687 --> 0:04:18.767
<v Speaker 3>Many years ago. So it's quite interesting when you think

0:04:18.807 --> 0:04:22.007
<v Speaker 3>about of all the things he's done wrong. The two

0:04:22.047 --> 0:04:26.047
<v Speaker 3>cases where he's been convicted, Stormy Daniels and Agene Carroll,

0:04:26.247 --> 0:04:29.447
<v Speaker 3>Like it's two women who have I would love to

0:04:29.447 --> 0:04:30.847
<v Speaker 3>say brought him down, But he's not going to go

0:04:30.967 --> 0:04:32.967
<v Speaker 3>Is he going to go to jail? No, I mean

0:04:33.087 --> 0:04:35.847
<v Speaker 3>they're saying he could. With each count, you can face

0:04:35.887 --> 0:04:38.207
<v Speaker 3>up to four years in prison. I highly doubt that's

0:04:38.247 --> 0:04:38.887
<v Speaker 3>going to happen.

0:04:39.007 --> 0:04:41.127
<v Speaker 2>Everybody says it's not there, so that if he wasn't

0:04:41.167 --> 0:04:43.247
<v Speaker 2>Donald Trump, he wouldn't be going to jail because it's,

0:04:43.287 --> 0:04:45.767
<v Speaker 2>you know, it's his first conviction. Ironic as that might seem.

0:04:46.047 --> 0:04:47.527
<v Speaker 2>He's got the best lawyers in the world. It's a

0:04:47.567 --> 0:04:50.087
<v Speaker 2>nonviolent offense. He's not going to go to jail. And

0:04:50.247 --> 0:04:53.407
<v Speaker 2>disappointingly because on Friday when this news came through, for

0:04:53.447 --> 0:04:56.207
<v Speaker 2>a while there was this sort of euphoria almost for

0:04:56.207 --> 0:04:56.887
<v Speaker 2>a moment.

0:04:56.647 --> 0:04:58.767
<v Speaker 5>Of like ding Dong l Witch's day, guilty. Guilty.

0:04:58.807 --> 0:05:02.447
<v Speaker 2>There's never been a convicted felon running for president before.

0:05:03.007 --> 0:05:05.687
<v Speaker 2>But as has been shown in the days since, I mean,

0:05:05.727 --> 0:05:09.447
<v Speaker 2>Trump always overturns political norms, like he can prove a

0:05:09.487 --> 0:05:12.127
<v Speaker 2>thing wrong, and his popularity is in fact searched and

0:05:12.167 --> 0:05:13.807
<v Speaker 2>so he probably is not going to prison and is

0:05:13.847 --> 0:05:15.327
<v Speaker 2>still going to run, and he probably will win.

0:05:15.447 --> 0:05:17.247
<v Speaker 3>And I in fact think that if he went to prison,

0:05:17.447 --> 0:05:19.727
<v Speaker 3>his followers would quite like that because it would make

0:05:19.807 --> 0:05:20.687
<v Speaker 3>him look really good in there.

0:05:20.727 --> 0:05:23.367
<v Speaker 2>Off well, it buys into the conspiracy theory. So he

0:05:23.487 --> 0:05:24.287
<v Speaker 2>says it's a fix.

0:05:24.607 --> 0:05:28.727
<v Speaker 6>This was a disgrace. This was a rigged trial by

0:05:28.727 --> 0:05:33.327
<v Speaker 6>a conflicted judge who was corrupted. There's a riged trial

0:05:33.367 --> 0:05:37.567
<v Speaker 6>and disgrace. They wouldn't give us a venue change. We

0:05:37.567 --> 0:05:42.647
<v Speaker 6>were at five percent or six percent in this district,

0:05:42.687 --> 0:05:43.367
<v Speaker 6>in this area.

0:05:44.447 --> 0:05:45.287
<v Speaker 2>This was a.

0:05:45.207 --> 0:05:49.367
<v Speaker 6>Rigged, disgraceful trial. That the real verdict is going to

0:05:49.407 --> 0:05:53.727
<v Speaker 6>be November fifth by the people, and they know what

0:05:53.847 --> 0:05:56.127
<v Speaker 6>happened here, and everybody knows what happened here.

0:05:56.647 --> 0:05:59.727
<v Speaker 2>It plays very clearly into the people who believe that

0:05:59.807 --> 0:06:02.407
<v Speaker 2>this is all part of a conspiracy claim.

0:06:02.407 --> 0:06:04.487
<v Speaker 5>If you from the Quickie did a brilliant episode on

0:06:04.527 --> 0:06:06.647
<v Speaker 5>the Trump verdict, you can listen to that via the

0:06:06.687 --> 0:06:07.687
<v Speaker 5>link in the show notes.

0:06:10.847 --> 0:06:12.447
<v Speaker 1>There was another wedding over the weekend.

0:06:12.647 --> 0:06:15.247
<v Speaker 3>Britney Higgins got married on the Gold Coast to her

0:06:15.327 --> 0:06:19.847
<v Speaker 3>partner David Schiraz. She wore ature gown by an Australian designer.

0:06:20.287 --> 0:06:23.007
<v Speaker 3>She said, I do at a loveliest station in the

0:06:23.007 --> 0:06:26.327
<v Speaker 3>Corimbin Valley. She had everything you can imagine at a

0:06:26.367 --> 0:06:32.087
<v Speaker 3>beautiful Australian wedding except perhaps paparazzi photos. She basically got

0:06:32.087 --> 0:06:35.887
<v Speaker 3>the celebrity treatment. There were photos in the papers over

0:06:35.927 --> 0:06:40.407
<v Speaker 3>the weekend of her vendors coming in, her cake being delivered.

0:06:41.287 --> 0:06:44.647
<v Speaker 3>She was using umbrellas to shield her dress. To jog

0:06:44.687 --> 0:06:48.767
<v Speaker 3>your memory. Britney Higgins is famous in quotation marks in

0:06:48.807 --> 0:06:52.647
<v Speaker 3>Australia because she alleges that she was raped in Parliament

0:06:52.647 --> 0:06:55.807
<v Speaker 3>House in twenty nineteen by a colleague. That is her

0:06:55.847 --> 0:06:57.007
<v Speaker 3>claim to fame.

0:06:57.207 --> 0:06:59.727
<v Speaker 5>Yeah. I was reading about how the Daily Mail paid

0:06:59.727 --> 0:07:04.167
<v Speaker 5>fifteen hundred dollars to hire a helicopter to get aerial

0:07:04.207 --> 0:07:07.367
<v Speaker 5>shots of the wedding, and I was like, that's a

0:07:07.407 --> 0:07:11.647
<v Speaker 5>pretty interesting thing that we are but sending tabloid and

0:07:11.647 --> 0:07:16.127
<v Speaker 5>paparazzi photographers to photograph the wedding of a rape victim.

0:07:16.567 --> 0:07:20.847
<v Speaker 5>I understand that she is now for better and worse worse,

0:07:20.967 --> 0:07:25.007
<v Speaker 5>she would say, a public figure, and that there is interest.

0:07:25.927 --> 0:07:27.967
<v Speaker 5>What I'm interested to understand is do you think that

0:07:28.127 --> 0:07:32.047
<v Speaker 5>interest is everybody wants a good thing to happen to her,

0:07:32.167 --> 0:07:35.527
<v Speaker 5>and everybody wants to cheer on hopefully this new chapter

0:07:35.607 --> 0:07:38.927
<v Speaker 5>in her life. Or do you think there's something a

0:07:38.927 --> 0:07:41.287
<v Speaker 5>bit more malevolent about the interest.

0:07:41.527 --> 0:07:43.127
<v Speaker 3>I think it's a bit of column a bit of

0:07:43.127 --> 0:07:45.047
<v Speaker 3>colum b. I mean, I know, I was excited to

0:07:45.047 --> 0:07:46.767
<v Speaker 3>see her name in a headline for a good reason,

0:07:46.967 --> 0:07:49.767
<v Speaker 3>for a change. I was like, oh, lovely, Britney got married,

0:07:49.887 --> 0:07:51.687
<v Speaker 3>and that's honestly all I thought about it. Then I

0:07:51.687 --> 0:07:53.647
<v Speaker 3>looked at the headlines a bit closer, and I noticed

0:07:53.727 --> 0:07:56.967
<v Speaker 3>that there seems to be a bit of snark behind

0:07:56.967 --> 0:07:59.567
<v Speaker 3>the way some people are covering this news in their

0:07:59.607 --> 0:08:01.847
<v Speaker 3>headlines and in their articles themselves.

0:08:02.207 --> 0:08:04.687
<v Speaker 2>The snark that I noticed because agreed, I saw the

0:08:04.727 --> 0:08:07.727
<v Speaker 2>picture shed on her official channels, and then by as

0:08:07.767 --> 0:08:11.767
<v Speaker 2>is obviously traditional millennial weddings, everybody waits for her to

0:08:11.767 --> 0:08:14.847
<v Speaker 2>post and then they can all post it. So Brittany

0:08:14.887 --> 0:08:18.767
<v Speaker 2>and David posted her husband David beautiful pictures, and then

0:08:19.167 --> 0:08:20.847
<v Speaker 2>various people who are at the wedding posted too.

0:08:20.727 --> 0:08:23.207
<v Speaker 5>And I was like, oh, who was there? I married

0:08:23.247 --> 0:08:25.207
<v Speaker 5>my best friend. She did and it was glorious.

0:08:25.247 --> 0:08:28.047
<v Speaker 2>But one of the things that I noticed immediately in

0:08:28.087 --> 0:08:30.647
<v Speaker 2>all the coverage, and it's obviously clicking really well if

0:08:30.647 --> 0:08:32.927
<v Speaker 2>you ever want to see, Like obviously we work in

0:08:32.967 --> 0:08:34.847
<v Speaker 2>digital media, we understand this, but I'm sure you all

0:08:34.887 --> 0:08:37.607
<v Speaker 2>do too. If Britney Higgins's wedding is still at the

0:08:37.607 --> 0:08:39.047
<v Speaker 2>top of the Daily Mail and still at the top

0:08:39.087 --> 0:08:40.527
<v Speaker 2>of all the news sites a couple of days after

0:08:40.567 --> 0:08:43.327
<v Speaker 2>it's happened, it means that people are interested and they're clicking.

0:08:43.607 --> 0:08:45.967
<v Speaker 2>And one of the things that you'll see in particularly

0:08:46.047 --> 0:08:48.327
<v Speaker 2>the Mail and the Australian coverage, I have to say,

0:08:48.847 --> 0:08:51.207
<v Speaker 2>is a lot of mention of how much everything costs.

0:08:51.327 --> 0:08:53.967
<v Speaker 2>So there's lots of use of the word lavish in everything.

0:08:54.247 --> 0:08:56.487
<v Speaker 2>There are quotes about how much the dress must have been.

0:08:56.727 --> 0:08:58.487
<v Speaker 2>There are quotes about how much it costs to hire

0:08:58.527 --> 0:09:01.367
<v Speaker 2>that vineyard, there are quotes about how much it costs

0:09:01.367 --> 0:09:03.807
<v Speaker 2>to hire you know, the cars and the secure.

0:09:04.487 --> 0:09:08.207
<v Speaker 5>Because every wedding is expensive, and every celebrity wedding.

0:09:07.967 --> 0:09:11.447
<v Speaker 2>Is well she is it a celebrity, That's the question.

0:09:11.967 --> 0:09:14.167
<v Speaker 2>I think that the people who are big supporters of

0:09:14.167 --> 0:09:17.087
<v Speaker 2>Brittany and let's not pretend that this news story and

0:09:17.127 --> 0:09:21.167
<v Speaker 2>all its various twists and turns and court cases and

0:09:21.207 --> 0:09:25.607
<v Speaker 2>countercourt cases and libel actions and defamation trials and civil suits.

0:09:25.647 --> 0:09:28.847
<v Speaker 2>Has not consumed the news media for the past or

0:09:29.007 --> 0:09:32.367
<v Speaker 2>five years. Almost she has become a public figure, and

0:09:32.407 --> 0:09:35.367
<v Speaker 2>I think that those who have always supported and rooted

0:09:35.367 --> 0:09:38.247
<v Speaker 2>for her, like you Jem, were like, this is gorgeous.

0:09:38.247 --> 0:09:40.007
<v Speaker 2>She's just living a life, getting on with her life.

0:09:40.007 --> 0:09:42.847
<v Speaker 2>This is an important milestone, Hurrah. I hate to give

0:09:42.887 --> 0:09:46.367
<v Speaker 2>credence to the commenters, but you can see the tone

0:09:46.407 --> 0:09:48.447
<v Speaker 2>that's leading to the snark about the money.

0:09:48.527 --> 0:09:51.607
<v Speaker 5>The dog whistle is about. What it is about the fact.

0:09:51.327 --> 0:09:55.727
<v Speaker 2>That she famously got settlements from the Australian government after

0:09:56.407 --> 0:10:00.887
<v Speaker 2>her trial collapsed, and that she's spending this money on

0:10:00.927 --> 0:10:03.887
<v Speaker 2>this lavish wedding and this lavish lifestyle that she and

0:10:03.967 --> 0:10:07.607
<v Speaker 2>David are leading. And I think that is what's behind

0:10:07.607 --> 0:10:10.047
<v Speaker 2>the snarky tone out.

0:10:09.847 --> 0:10:14.607
<v Speaker 3>Like she's this incredibly rich woman that has taken millions

0:10:14.647 --> 0:10:16.527
<v Speaker 3>upon millions from the Australian government.

0:10:16.887 --> 0:10:19.207
<v Speaker 1>I want to just tell you what she received. She

0:10:19.247 --> 0:10:19.767
<v Speaker 1>had a two.

0:10:19.647 --> 0:10:22.007
<v Speaker 3>Point four million dollar settlement, which does sound like a

0:10:22.007 --> 0:10:24.367
<v Speaker 3>lot of money, but when you actually break that down,

0:10:24.527 --> 0:10:29.407
<v Speaker 3>it's four hundred thousand dollars for hurt distress, humiliation. It's

0:10:29.487 --> 0:10:32.887
<v Speaker 3>one point four to eight million in earning capacity.

0:10:32.967 --> 0:10:34.527
<v Speaker 5>Two hundred lost earning.

0:10:34.287 --> 0:10:37.367
<v Speaker 3>Capacity, earning capacity, a bunch of money for medical, past

0:10:37.407 --> 0:10:40.207
<v Speaker 3>and future domestic assistance, and then two hundred and forty

0:10:40.207 --> 0:10:43.927
<v Speaker 3>five thousand in legal costs. So when you actually break

0:10:43.967 --> 0:10:46.247
<v Speaker 3>it all down, like, yes, she received a big payment,

0:10:46.247 --> 0:10:47.487
<v Speaker 3>but why shouldn't.

0:10:47.087 --> 0:10:50.967
<v Speaker 2>She have well, And also it's worth noting that this

0:10:51.007 --> 0:10:55.087
<v Speaker 2>is still going on. There's a claim from Linda Reynolds,

0:10:55.127 --> 0:10:56.927
<v Speaker 2>her former boss, to try and get some of that

0:10:56.967 --> 0:10:59.087
<v Speaker 2>money back as far as I understand it, right, so

0:10:59.127 --> 0:11:02.447
<v Speaker 2>it's still not settled. What's interesting is I was examining

0:11:02.487 --> 0:11:04.807
<v Speaker 2>my own response to this, right, and I was, as

0:11:04.847 --> 0:11:06.767
<v Speaker 2>I say, it was all over my feed from these

0:11:06.847 --> 0:11:10.327
<v Speaker 2>beautiful pictures, and I thought, how lovely. But there was

0:11:10.367 --> 0:11:12.287
<v Speaker 2>a bit of me when I then saw the pap

0:11:12.327 --> 0:11:16.287
<v Speaker 2>shots of them having to shield themselves under umbrellas, which

0:11:16.327 --> 0:11:18.447
<v Speaker 2>is very what soap stars and movie stars do.

0:11:18.727 --> 0:11:22.367
<v Speaker 5>Interestingly, though, whole we are very familiar with seeing those

0:11:22.407 --> 0:11:26.247
<v Speaker 5>pictures from the days when women's magazines like Women's Day

0:11:26.327 --> 0:11:30.047
<v Speaker 5>and Women's Weekly or People magazine would get exclusives. So

0:11:30.367 --> 0:11:33.767
<v Speaker 5>I think we need to just check our muscle memory,

0:11:33.847 --> 0:11:37.327
<v Speaker 5>because it used to be that those umbrellas signified was

0:11:37.407 --> 0:11:40.807
<v Speaker 5>and fair enough that they have been paid and they

0:11:40.847 --> 0:11:43.607
<v Speaker 5>need to protect the exclusive of the media channel that

0:11:43.647 --> 0:11:47.407
<v Speaker 5>they've sold their wedding to. Now that's not as far

0:11:47.407 --> 0:11:49.567
<v Speaker 5>as we know, No, it could be. I don't think

0:11:49.567 --> 0:11:53.327
<v Speaker 5>that's what's happening here. This is more just about literally

0:11:53.407 --> 0:11:58.647
<v Speaker 5>the privacy of a woman whose privacy has been I mean,

0:11:58.727 --> 0:12:01.167
<v Speaker 5>my god, not only the things that we've heard in

0:12:01.247 --> 0:12:04.887
<v Speaker 5>court and heard her have to recount under evidence, but

0:12:04.967 --> 0:12:09.687
<v Speaker 5>also the leaking of text messages, phone records. It's quite

0:12:09.807 --> 0:12:11.367
<v Speaker 5>extraordinary what's happened to her.

0:12:11.567 --> 0:12:13.727
<v Speaker 2>You're write me that when I see the black umbrellas

0:12:13.727 --> 0:12:16.607
<v Speaker 2>and I see all that stuff, I think, oh, celebrity treatment.

0:12:17.127 --> 0:12:19.207
<v Speaker 2>You're absolutely right, it's not that. But there was a

0:12:19.207 --> 0:12:21.727
<v Speaker 2>bit of me examining my own reaction that was like,

0:12:21.807 --> 0:12:24.327
<v Speaker 2>I wonder, why, when you've been subject to all of

0:12:24.367 --> 0:12:27.647
<v Speaker 2>that scrutiny that you just explained, you might not choose

0:12:27.807 --> 0:12:31.087
<v Speaker 2>to sneak off in inverted commas and have some kind

0:12:31.087 --> 0:12:34.047
<v Speaker 2>of very private, quiet wedding, because surely the last thing

0:12:34.087 --> 0:12:35.127
<v Speaker 2>you'd want was all that attention.

0:12:35.567 --> 0:12:37.447
<v Speaker 5>But then I kind of had to check myself and

0:12:37.567 --> 0:12:38.527
<v Speaker 5>I the same thing.

0:12:38.887 --> 0:12:41.407
<v Speaker 2>But I had to check myself, which I often do

0:12:41.647 --> 0:12:43.607
<v Speaker 2>when I feel myself feeling, you know, one of those

0:12:43.687 --> 0:12:46.287
<v Speaker 2>kind of judgy little knots that you get sometimes when

0:12:46.287 --> 0:12:49.887
<v Speaker 2>you're scrolling social media, And I was like, why the

0:12:49.927 --> 0:12:54.247
<v Speaker 2>fuck should she Why shouldn't she get what every young

0:12:54.367 --> 0:12:56.927
<v Speaker 2>woman who wants that kind of wedding wants, which is

0:12:57.447 --> 0:13:00.047
<v Speaker 2>to be able to celebrate it with everybody and exactly

0:13:00.087 --> 0:13:01.967
<v Speaker 2>the way she wants it to do, and celebrate her

0:13:01.967 --> 0:13:04.927
<v Speaker 2>love publicly. And in a way it's a radical act

0:13:04.967 --> 0:13:09.527
<v Speaker 2>because we'd like to define Britney Higgins and maybe other

0:13:09.767 --> 0:13:12.687
<v Speaker 2>rape victims too, by their worst day, by the worst

0:13:12.727 --> 0:13:15.167
<v Speaker 2>thing that happened to them, by what we used to

0:13:15.207 --> 0:13:17.567
<v Speaker 2>love to shame women for. You know that there's some

0:13:17.647 --> 0:13:19.887
<v Speaker 2>kind of shame attached to what she should hide away

0:13:19.927 --> 0:13:23.007
<v Speaker 2>happened to her. So when I was examining my reaction,

0:13:23.087 --> 0:13:26.367
<v Speaker 2>I was like, this is actually brilliant that she's She's

0:13:26.447 --> 0:13:28.327
<v Speaker 2>just living her life. And it's the same with this

0:13:28.367 --> 0:13:31.207
<v Speaker 2>move to France, which is also weaponized by the press

0:13:31.247 --> 0:13:32.687
<v Speaker 2>that don't like her as being like.

0:13:32.927 --> 0:13:35.407
<v Speaker 5>They've run away to a lavish chateau. If you say

0:13:35.407 --> 0:13:37.327
<v Speaker 5>the word chateau. It always sounds very lavish.

0:13:37.367 --> 0:13:39.567
<v Speaker 2>Actually looks more like a crumbling farmhouse in the country,

0:13:39.567 --> 0:13:43.007
<v Speaker 2>but still chateau. And she, you know, has posted about

0:13:43.007 --> 0:13:45.927
<v Speaker 2>that and about their life and what it looks like now.

0:13:46.567 --> 0:13:49.287
<v Speaker 2>And it's such a positive thing really to be able

0:13:49.327 --> 0:13:51.887
<v Speaker 2>to go, you know what, I survived all that shit.

0:13:52.207 --> 0:13:54.647
<v Speaker 2>I survived it and now I'm living my life and

0:13:54.687 --> 0:13:56.167
<v Speaker 2>I will not be defined by it.

0:13:56.727 --> 0:13:58.967
<v Speaker 4>She has lived the last few years.

0:13:59.247 --> 0:14:00.407
<v Speaker 1>Only doing things like.

0:14:00.407 --> 0:14:03.607
<v Speaker 3>Cork cases, appearing in the media, doing all this stuff.

0:14:03.847 --> 0:14:05.567
<v Speaker 3>Why on earth would she not have a big wedding.

0:14:05.567 --> 0:14:06.887
<v Speaker 3>I actually think it would have been a bit sad

0:14:06.927 --> 0:14:09.007
<v Speaker 3>or if she had a small wedding in heat Away,

0:14:09.047 --> 0:14:10.327
<v Speaker 3>because this is her moment.

0:14:10.127 --> 0:14:11.487
<v Speaker 1>To actually celebrate herself.

0:14:11.767 --> 0:14:20.967
<v Speaker 4>Why wouldn't Shell.

0:14:18.047 --> 0:14:20.287
<v Speaker 5>Thirty six months now? If you've seen this number on

0:14:20.327 --> 0:14:22.807
<v Speaker 5>your socials this week shared by a lot of influential

0:14:22.887 --> 0:14:27.007
<v Speaker 5>parents like Zoe Foster, Blake, Guy Sbastian, Kate Richie, Steph,

0:14:27.047 --> 0:14:30.727
<v Speaker 5>Claire Smith, and Megan Gail, which I haven't to be honest,

0:14:30.767 --> 0:14:33.287
<v Speaker 5>which shows that my algorithm knows I don't consume much

0:14:33.327 --> 0:14:37.607
<v Speaker 5>parenting content. But after our conversation this morning, a lot

0:14:37.607 --> 0:14:39.527
<v Speaker 5>of people were talking about it, so we wanted to

0:14:39.527 --> 0:14:42.127
<v Speaker 5>cover it on the show today. You might, like me,

0:14:42.367 --> 0:14:44.407
<v Speaker 5>be wondering what it's all about, And there was a

0:14:44.447 --> 0:14:47.807
<v Speaker 5>Muma Mere story about this over the weekend which explained it.

0:14:48.367 --> 0:14:51.767
<v Speaker 5>All of these people are sharing throwback photos of themselves

0:14:52.207 --> 0:14:55.807
<v Speaker 5>around the age of thirteen to throw their support behind

0:14:55.807 --> 0:14:58.167
<v Speaker 5>a new campaign to raise the age at which kids

0:14:58.207 --> 0:15:02.007
<v Speaker 5>can legally access social media. At the moment, the age

0:15:02.007 --> 0:15:04.447
<v Speaker 5>that you can get social media is thirteen, although it's

0:15:04.447 --> 0:15:06.647
<v Speaker 5>not like applying for a driver's license or trying to

0:15:06.687 --> 0:15:09.447
<v Speaker 5>get into a pub. You don't need any proof of

0:15:09.487 --> 0:15:12.047
<v Speaker 5>your age. You just have to say when your birthday is.

0:15:12.127 --> 0:15:15.167
<v Speaker 5>So that seems a little problematic and a little bit

0:15:15.207 --> 0:15:19.047
<v Speaker 5>porous as far as boundaries go. But the campaign aims

0:15:19.087 --> 0:15:22.927
<v Speaker 5>to buy teens thirty six months or three more years

0:15:23.047 --> 0:15:27.407
<v Speaker 5>away from social media to help safeguard their digital future.

0:15:27.927 --> 0:15:29.647
<v Speaker 5>So it would raise the minimum age to have a

0:15:29.647 --> 0:15:32.967
<v Speaker 5>social media account up to sixteen, which is interestingly the

0:15:33.007 --> 0:15:36.167
<v Speaker 5>same age that you can legally start having sex. The

0:15:36.167 --> 0:15:38.367
<v Speaker 5>new movement is called thirty six months, as I said,

0:15:38.367 --> 0:15:40.407
<v Speaker 5>and it believes that kids need more time to develop

0:15:40.487 --> 0:15:44.287
<v Speaker 5>healthy and secure identities before they're exposed to the minefield

0:15:44.407 --> 0:15:47.927
<v Speaker 5>of social media. I've signed this petition. I saw it

0:15:48.087 --> 0:15:50.927
<v Speaker 5>of you, yeah, I did. My kids are out the

0:15:50.927 --> 0:15:53.727
<v Speaker 5>other side of it. Like for me, the horse has

0:15:53.767 --> 0:15:57.807
<v Speaker 5>bolted very much. And my kids are you know, twenty six,

0:15:58.527 --> 0:16:03.327
<v Speaker 5>eighteen and almost sixteen. But my eldest children were not

0:16:03.647 --> 0:16:07.607
<v Speaker 5>on social when they were really young, and they really

0:16:07.807 --> 0:16:11.167
<v Speaker 5>benefited from not is that because you stopped them or

0:16:11.207 --> 0:16:13.847
<v Speaker 5>they weren't interesting. It just didn't really exist. I was

0:16:13.887 --> 0:16:16.087
<v Speaker 5>more I mean, as anyone, but obviously not Luca because

0:16:16.127 --> 0:16:18.207
<v Speaker 5>he's twenty six. He wasn't very interested because he was

0:16:18.247 --> 0:16:19.727
<v Speaker 5>a boy and he was twenty six, and it was

0:16:19.767 --> 0:16:22.287
<v Speaker 5>pre Instagram pretty much, or Instagram was just kind of

0:16:22.287 --> 0:16:25.767
<v Speaker 5>starting back then. Certainly Instagram wasn't a very interesting place

0:16:25.807 --> 0:16:30.247
<v Speaker 5>for boys anyway. And then my daughter there's also Snapchat,

0:16:30.327 --> 0:16:32.927
<v Speaker 5>and of course there is Instagram. She's definitely been affected

0:16:32.967 --> 0:16:36.247
<v Speaker 5>by Instagram and the people who are most passionate about

0:16:36.287 --> 0:16:38.447
<v Speaker 5>the need for the age to be lifted. Interestingly, as

0:16:38.487 --> 0:16:42.967
<v Speaker 5>a lot of teenagers who are older and who've said, oh, yeah,

0:16:43.167 --> 0:16:45.967
<v Speaker 5>you know, it's really bad because it's not just the

0:16:46.007 --> 0:16:51.047
<v Speaker 5>imagery that you're exposed to, it's also the you know,

0:16:51.367 --> 0:16:54.407
<v Speaker 5>every time you put a photo up or someone puts

0:16:54.407 --> 0:16:56.487
<v Speaker 5>a photo up of you, it's all the commentary that

0:16:56.567 --> 0:17:00.847
<v Speaker 5>happens underneath that. And for girls, it's this incredible emphasis

0:17:00.887 --> 0:17:04.447
<v Speaker 5>on appearance. It's the use of face tune and what

0:17:04.487 --> 0:17:06.887
<v Speaker 5>that does, scrolling and scrolling and scrolling and looking at

0:17:06.887 --> 0:17:11.327
<v Speaker 5>images of people that don't exist. And then there's really

0:17:11.327 --> 0:17:14.447
<v Speaker 5>insidious things like on Snapchat there's a feature called snapmaps,

0:17:14.447 --> 0:17:16.887
<v Speaker 5>which I've talked about lots of times, which a lot

0:17:16.967 --> 0:17:19.647
<v Speaker 5>of parents would have no idea about, because most teenagers

0:17:19.767 --> 0:17:24.567
<v Speaker 5>use Snapchat as just their form of messaging. The way

0:17:24.607 --> 0:17:28.087
<v Speaker 5>snap maps works, everybody that you follow you can see

0:17:28.087 --> 0:17:30.367
<v Speaker 5>where they are on a map of your area. So

0:17:30.807 --> 0:17:32.847
<v Speaker 5>you can see when everybody's at someone's house and you

0:17:32.887 --> 0:17:35.327
<v Speaker 5>didn't get invited. You can see when everybody's at a party.

0:17:35.727 --> 0:17:38.007
<v Speaker 5>You've got situations where girls will be like, oh no,

0:17:38.087 --> 0:17:40.407
<v Speaker 5>I can't come over. Mom says I've got to stay

0:17:40.447 --> 0:17:42.487
<v Speaker 5>at home, and then you see everybody's over at Sophie's

0:17:42.487 --> 0:17:46.207
<v Speaker 5>house on snap maps. And the idea of this campaign

0:17:46.647 --> 0:17:49.607
<v Speaker 5>is that kids at age thirteen just aren't equipped to

0:17:49.727 --> 0:17:51.847
<v Speaker 5>deal with all of that. I mean, adults aren't equipped

0:17:51.847 --> 0:17:54.967
<v Speaker 5>to deal with it. Holly you've got kids in the

0:17:55.007 --> 0:17:58.447
<v Speaker 5>crosshairs of this age. Why are you surprised that I

0:17:58.487 --> 0:18:00.967
<v Speaker 5>signed the petition and will use it. I thought that

0:18:01.087 --> 0:18:06.887
<v Speaker 5>you were on my team. Maybe I've switched teams. Tell me.

0:18:09.327 --> 0:18:12.687
<v Speaker 2>A bit facetious, because so my daughter's fourteen. She got

0:18:12.687 --> 0:18:15.327
<v Speaker 2>her first phone when she went to high school. I

0:18:15.407 --> 0:18:17.967
<v Speaker 2>was relatively proud of myself for holding out to high

0:18:18.007 --> 0:18:20.247
<v Speaker 2>school because in the particularly when we lived in Sydney,

0:18:20.287 --> 0:18:21.727
<v Speaker 2>it was certainly the case. There are lots of primary

0:18:21.727 --> 0:18:25.127
<v Speaker 2>school kids who had phones. And where all this is

0:18:25.167 --> 0:18:27.607
<v Speaker 2>coming from, well not where it's coming from. But part

0:18:27.647 --> 0:18:29.967
<v Speaker 2>of the movement for this change is to do with

0:18:30.007 --> 0:18:32.527
<v Speaker 2>that Jonathan Hype book. He's written a book called The

0:18:32.567 --> 0:18:35.607
<v Speaker 2>Anxious Generation, and we talked about an essay that he'd

0:18:35.607 --> 0:18:38.127
<v Speaker 2>written in The Atlantic called end the Phone based Childhood Now,

0:18:38.287 --> 0:18:41.847
<v Speaker 2>which was about how basically smartphones of ruined degeneration right,

0:18:41.967 --> 0:18:44.447
<v Speaker 2>and one of his calls to action in there is

0:18:44.487 --> 0:18:47.447
<v Speaker 2>that parents need to band together. That's a lot of

0:18:47.487 --> 0:18:51.727
<v Speaker 2>what this campaign is about. It's about normalizing and mobilizing

0:18:51.887 --> 0:18:54.687
<v Speaker 2>parental groups to be able to go because what happens

0:18:54.727 --> 0:18:57.367
<v Speaker 2>is your kid says I want a phone, I want snapchat, whatever,

0:18:57.727 --> 0:19:00.527
<v Speaker 2>and you say no, and they say everybody's got it,

0:19:00.567 --> 0:19:02.527
<v Speaker 2>and if I don't have it, I'll be ostracized. And

0:19:02.567 --> 0:19:06.247
<v Speaker 2>in often cases that's relatively true. But what Height argues

0:19:06.367 --> 0:19:09.727
<v Speaker 2>is the only way to change that apart from these

0:19:09.727 --> 0:19:13.647
<v Speaker 2>systemic changes that we're talking about, like proper age gating

0:19:13.847 --> 0:19:16.887
<v Speaker 2>and raising the age and tech companies taking responsibility for

0:19:16.967 --> 0:19:19.647
<v Speaker 2>their irresponsible algorithms and all those things. But he's saying,

0:19:19.647 --> 0:19:22.887
<v Speaker 2>at a grassroots level, you have to convince other parents

0:19:22.887 --> 0:19:25.727
<v Speaker 2>to get on board with you and be like, Okay, none.

0:19:25.607 --> 0:19:28.567
<v Speaker 5>Of us will buy a phone. It's not fair. And

0:19:28.607 --> 0:19:29.527
<v Speaker 5>that's why i'm parents.

0:19:29.527 --> 0:19:31.767
<v Speaker 2>And that's interesting because when I joke and say I

0:19:31.767 --> 0:19:35.007
<v Speaker 2>thought you're on my team, it's not because I don't agree.

0:19:35.407 --> 0:19:37.447
<v Speaker 2>I think smartphones have ruined all of us to be

0:19:37.487 --> 0:19:42.487
<v Speaker 2>honest and politics and democracy and social discourse and many

0:19:42.527 --> 0:19:45.367
<v Speaker 2>many things. There's a bit of me that riles against

0:19:45.407 --> 0:19:48.807
<v Speaker 2>the parent pressure. And maybe that's because I gave in.

0:19:48.847 --> 0:19:50.567
<v Speaker 2>I guess, if we want to look at it that way.

0:19:50.567 --> 0:19:53.927
<v Speaker 2>But also I think it's hard to generalize about what

0:19:53.967 --> 0:19:54.647
<v Speaker 2>everybody eats.

0:19:55.007 --> 0:19:57.567
<v Speaker 5>That's what this is about, and that's why I signed it.

0:19:57.647 --> 0:20:00.247
<v Speaker 5>Because I agree with you. I don't think it's fair

0:20:01.047 --> 0:20:03.807
<v Speaker 5>to ask parents to do this. And you know, Jim

0:20:04.007 --> 0:20:07.167
<v Speaker 5>all I can compare this to is imagine if there

0:20:07.247 --> 0:20:12.487
<v Speaker 5>was no age restrict on alcohol and people said, oh, parents,

0:20:12.527 --> 0:20:14.967
<v Speaker 5>you just decide, And same with driving a car. You

0:20:15.007 --> 0:20:17.447
<v Speaker 5>know the age restriction, but you don't have to prove

0:20:17.487 --> 0:20:19.687
<v Speaker 5>that you're a certain age. It's just really a guideline

0:20:19.727 --> 0:20:22.127
<v Speaker 5>and we all know it's kind of just a loose recommendation.

0:20:22.687 --> 0:20:26.247
<v Speaker 5>So what parents asking for is for there to be

0:20:26.407 --> 0:20:29.607
<v Speaker 5>legislation that we don't have to be responsible for deciding

0:20:29.647 --> 0:20:32.087
<v Speaker 5>whether our children can drink, whether they can be on

0:20:32.167 --> 0:20:36.047
<v Speaker 5>social media. And some people might say that's outsourcing to

0:20:36.127 --> 0:20:38.167
<v Speaker 5>the government and to big tech, but we do this

0:20:38.247 --> 0:20:41.127
<v Speaker 5>with other important things like sex and alcohol and voting.

0:20:41.687 --> 0:20:43.487
<v Speaker 5>We don't just say here's a loose guideline, what do

0:20:43.527 --> 0:20:43.847
<v Speaker 5>you think.

0:20:43.927 --> 0:20:47.647
<v Speaker 3>But with something like sex you can say that there's

0:20:47.687 --> 0:20:50.327
<v Speaker 3>a legal limit, it doesn't mean that kids are going to.

0:20:50.287 --> 0:20:52.927
<v Speaker 4>Actually abide by it. With alcohol, you.

0:20:52.847 --> 0:20:55.967
<v Speaker 3>To walk into a liquor store, show them a fake

0:20:56.007 --> 0:20:57.967
<v Speaker 3>ID and they can go, yeah, no out you go

0:20:58.167 --> 0:20:58.887
<v Speaker 3>and yeah, buy it.

0:20:58.927 --> 0:21:00.487
<v Speaker 1>But this is the internet. You can do whatever you

0:21:00.527 --> 0:21:00.807
<v Speaker 1>want on me.

0:21:01.007 --> 0:21:04.607
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but it's true that you can circumnavigate any rule

0:21:04.687 --> 0:21:06.247
<v Speaker 2>or law if you want to, but there is no

0:21:06.407 --> 0:21:08.927
<v Speaker 2>doubt that that law is a terror right. So yeah,

0:21:08.967 --> 0:21:11.327
<v Speaker 2>of course it's true that thirteen year olds will still

0:21:11.327 --> 0:21:14.007
<v Speaker 2>find a way onto social media. But if tech companies

0:21:14.007 --> 0:21:16.007
<v Speaker 2>were really serious about it, they could make their age

0:21:16.007 --> 0:21:19.127
<v Speaker 2>getting really sophisticated. I mean, AARI is supposed to be

0:21:19.167 --> 0:21:21.007
<v Speaker 2>able to do anything, but apparently it can't tell how

0:21:21.007 --> 0:21:23.207
<v Speaker 2>old somebody is is looking at their phone. I'm like, really,

0:21:23.527 --> 0:21:26.927
<v Speaker 2>but what I'd love to it? Yeah, exactly. I'd love

0:21:26.967 --> 0:21:29.327
<v Speaker 2>to know from you, Jem. So you're a relatively new parent,

0:21:29.367 --> 0:21:30.767
<v Speaker 2>your little boys one one.

0:21:30.607 --> 0:21:31.007
<v Speaker 5>And a half.

0:21:31.967 --> 0:21:35.207
<v Speaker 2>I'd love to know if your generation of parents, like

0:21:35.327 --> 0:21:39.727
<v Speaker 2>Jesse obviously to watching all this, have a very different

0:21:39.767 --> 0:21:41.047
<v Speaker 2>attitude to technology.

0:21:41.167 --> 0:21:43.167
<v Speaker 5>You like, my child will never see a screen. What

0:21:43.207 --> 0:21:43.767
<v Speaker 5>do you think.

0:21:44.087 --> 0:21:44.767
<v Speaker 1>There's no doubt.

0:21:44.767 --> 0:21:48.087
<v Speaker 3>It's at the forefront of my mind because I'm addicted

0:21:48.127 --> 0:21:50.247
<v Speaker 3>to my phone, and my son knows that if he

0:21:50.287 --> 0:21:52.687
<v Speaker 3>sees my phone unattended in my house, he goes and.

0:21:52.647 --> 0:21:53.647
<v Speaker 1>Gets it and gives it to me.

0:21:54.007 --> 0:21:55.847
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, he doesn't want to use it, he gives it

0:21:55.887 --> 0:21:58.607
<v Speaker 3>to me because he knows my mom's phone.

0:21:59.447 --> 0:22:00.807
<v Speaker 1>So I know that it's bad.

0:22:01.247 --> 0:22:03.007
<v Speaker 3>I think part of me feels and no, no, this

0:22:03.047 --> 0:22:04.927
<v Speaker 3>is horrible, but a little bit protected because I have

0:22:04.967 --> 0:22:07.207
<v Speaker 3>a boy, and I know that he's probably not going

0:22:07.287 --> 0:22:09.727
<v Speaker 3>to be as obsessed as I want, or as a

0:22:09.767 --> 0:22:13.047
<v Speaker 3>lot of the young girls I see are. I don't

0:22:13.047 --> 0:22:16.407
<v Speaker 3>think I will be stopping him from having a phone

0:22:16.447 --> 0:22:18.647
<v Speaker 3>at a certain age. Obviously I'm not at that point.

0:22:19.647 --> 0:22:22.527
<v Speaker 3>Just have a little micro chap hovocrafts. But for the

0:22:22.567 --> 0:22:25.407
<v Speaker 3>safety reasons, I like the idea of him having a phone.

0:22:26.287 --> 0:22:28.247
<v Speaker 3>For the stranger danger, for the being on the buses.

0:22:28.367 --> 0:22:31.127
<v Speaker 5>It's the phone. It's the social media and social media.

0:22:31.207 --> 0:22:34.007
<v Speaker 5>That's the lie that we were sold that giving your

0:22:34.087 --> 0:22:38.727
<v Speaker 5>child a phone means giving them social media and access

0:22:38.807 --> 0:22:43.167
<v Speaker 5>to a completely unregulated internet. And that's where I think

0:22:43.607 --> 0:22:47.287
<v Speaker 5>we are learning through trial and error, And unfortunately, there's

0:22:47.327 --> 0:22:49.847
<v Speaker 5>a generation that is going to be error and we're

0:22:49.887 --> 0:22:53.567
<v Speaker 5>seeing shocking things in terms of mental health and body

0:22:53.607 --> 0:22:55.567
<v Speaker 5>image and all of that bullying and all of these

0:22:55.767 --> 0:22:59.287
<v Speaker 5>issues that we couldn't have well maybe we could have foreseen,

0:22:59.607 --> 0:23:03.127
<v Speaker 5>but that nobody did foresee the long term effects of

0:23:03.207 --> 0:23:03.767
<v Speaker 5>social media.

0:23:03.807 --> 0:23:06.207
<v Speaker 2>Well, lots of people argue that the tech companies, you know,

0:23:06.287 --> 0:23:08.607
<v Speaker 2>they did foresee it, and that they encourage it because

0:23:08.767 --> 0:23:10.847
<v Speaker 2>their number one and only priority is to keep you

0:23:10.927 --> 0:23:13.007
<v Speaker 2>on your phone as long as possible, however old you are.

0:23:13.287 --> 0:23:15.087
<v Speaker 2>And I mean I'm being a bit facetious when I

0:23:15.127 --> 0:23:17.727
<v Speaker 2>say I'm being defensive about it. I do support the

0:23:17.807 --> 0:23:20.407
<v Speaker 2>idea of social media and having the age limit raise.

0:23:20.447 --> 0:23:22.247
<v Speaker 5>I really do, so I may well go and sign.

0:23:22.967 --> 0:23:27.887
<v Speaker 2>But I find the pressure to make parents group together

0:23:27.967 --> 0:23:30.167
<v Speaker 2>to push on these things like phone ages and stuff

0:23:30.207 --> 0:23:34.287
<v Speaker 2>hard because different families have really different circumstances. And you'll

0:23:34.287 --> 0:23:36.167
<v Speaker 2>often know that some of the kids who will get

0:23:36.207 --> 0:23:39.927
<v Speaker 2>phones earlier than others, and phones are the start of it,

0:23:39.967 --> 0:23:41.527
<v Speaker 2>all right, But what's a whole what's the.

0:23:41.687 --> 0:23:44.767
<v Speaker 5>User case for a kid having social media at thirteen?

0:23:44.927 --> 0:23:47.927
<v Speaker 5>The only one is that all my friends do exactly. Yes,

0:23:48.007 --> 0:23:51.007
<v Speaker 5>So if that was taken out of the parents' hands

0:23:51.047 --> 0:23:53.487
<v Speaker 5>in terms of having to push against the tide of

0:23:53.567 --> 0:23:57.007
<v Speaker 5>peer pressure, great peer pressure, that would be great, right, yeah,

0:23:57.007 --> 0:23:59.847
<v Speaker 5>one hundred percent. Let's give that responsibility back to the technology.

0:23:59.887 --> 0:24:00.007
<v Speaker 3>I know.

0:24:00.127 --> 0:24:00.687
<v Speaker 5>I like that.

0:24:00.847 --> 0:24:02.927
<v Speaker 2>So what I'm saying is I like this push to

0:24:03.007 --> 0:24:05.327
<v Speaker 2>raise the age. But the thing that irks me a

0:24:05.367 --> 0:24:08.567
<v Speaker 2>little bit is the idea that all parents need to

0:24:08.567 --> 0:24:10.527
<v Speaker 2>get together and to agree on these things when our

0:24:10.567 --> 0:24:13.247
<v Speaker 2>situation is really different. If you are a single parent,

0:24:13.527 --> 0:24:15.487
<v Speaker 2>you have very different reasons for needing your kid to

0:24:15.527 --> 0:24:17.407
<v Speaker 2>have a phone and be able to be contactable than

0:24:17.447 --> 0:24:18.967
<v Speaker 2>some other parents. If your kid has to travel a

0:24:18.967 --> 0:24:21.087
<v Speaker 2>long way to school, you have different reasons. If you

0:24:21.447 --> 0:24:23.887
<v Speaker 2>work funny hours and your shifts might change at any time,

0:24:24.047 --> 0:24:26.247
<v Speaker 2>you have different reasons. So I guess what I'm saying

0:24:26.287 --> 0:24:28.207
<v Speaker 2>is I agree with this campaign, but there's a bit

0:24:28.247 --> 0:24:30.807
<v Speaker 2>of me that's like, we have to stop saying that

0:24:31.047 --> 0:24:32.207
<v Speaker 2>parents have to deal with it.

0:24:32.407 --> 0:24:34.727
<v Speaker 3>You know, do you think that thirty six months will

0:24:34.767 --> 0:24:37.567
<v Speaker 3>actually have an impact on children?

0:24:37.687 --> 0:24:41.087
<v Speaker 2>Yes, because the age difference between thirteen and sixteen is huge.

0:24:41.447 --> 0:24:45.007
<v Speaker 2>It's so funny how quickly social norms have shifted that

0:24:45.087 --> 0:24:48.087
<v Speaker 2>I cannot actually imagine kids not being allowed to be

0:24:48.167 --> 0:24:51.047
<v Speaker 2>on social media till they're sixteen. But that's just like

0:24:51.127 --> 0:24:52.727
<v Speaker 2>I used to never be able to imagine that you

0:24:52.727 --> 0:24:54.447
<v Speaker 2>weren't allowed to smoke in a restaurant, you know what

0:24:54.527 --> 0:24:57.647
<v Speaker 2>I mean? Like very quickly if and when, and I

0:24:57.687 --> 0:25:00.327
<v Speaker 2>think it probably is a when these kind of age

0:25:00.367 --> 0:25:03.247
<v Speaker 2>gating rules come in, will probably very quickly, as you

0:25:03.287 --> 0:25:06.687
<v Speaker 2>said me are about alcohol be I can't believe that

0:25:06.767 --> 0:25:09.247
<v Speaker 2>my fourteen year old was on Instagram.

0:25:09.447 --> 0:25:11.447
<v Speaker 3>I really do think that we need more in schools,

0:25:11.447 --> 0:25:13.847
<v Speaker 3>though I always think with this stuff it's about education.

0:25:14.367 --> 0:25:17.727
<v Speaker 3>I think what this thirty six month campaign recognizes is

0:25:17.767 --> 0:25:23.927
<v Speaker 3>that those ages between thirteen and sixteen are absolutely unlike

0:25:24.247 --> 0:25:28.007
<v Speaker 3>any other three years of a person's life in terms

0:25:28.007 --> 0:25:31.127
<v Speaker 3>of how vulnerable you are, how much you're changing, how

0:25:31.207 --> 0:25:35.127
<v Speaker 3>much your body's changing, how much understanding where you are

0:25:35.127 --> 0:25:38.447
<v Speaker 3>in the world changes, how much your friendship groups change.

0:25:38.767 --> 0:25:41.567
<v Speaker 3>You know, they say to you when you start high school,

0:25:41.807 --> 0:25:43.647
<v Speaker 3>it's when as a parent you go from being your

0:25:43.727 --> 0:25:47.407
<v Speaker 3>child's manager to being a consultant around the age of thirteen,

0:25:48.047 --> 0:25:51.527
<v Speaker 3>and so suddenly we're going away from being our child's

0:25:51.527 --> 0:25:55.807
<v Speaker 3>manager to handing that over to the unregulated Internet, and

0:25:55.847 --> 0:25:59.927
<v Speaker 3>that I think we're only really realizing now the consequences

0:25:59.967 --> 0:26:02.247
<v Speaker 3>of that. I think that the idea of oh, the

0:26:02.287 --> 0:26:03.167
<v Speaker 3>journey's out of theottle.

0:26:03.207 --> 0:26:05.327
<v Speaker 5>It's too late. I'm glad that people are thinking it's

0:26:05.327 --> 0:26:05.927
<v Speaker 5>not too late.

0:26:06.167 --> 0:26:08.527
<v Speaker 2>My son obviously has gone to high school in January.

0:26:09.407 --> 0:26:11.447
<v Speaker 2>Of the rules that we had for my daughter, which

0:26:11.487 --> 0:26:13.207
<v Speaker 2>was that she got her phone when she went high school.

0:26:13.207 --> 0:26:16.247
<v Speaker 2>That's exactly what everyone is expecting to happen, and in

0:26:16.327 --> 0:26:19.807
<v Speaker 2>large part because of Jonathan Ate and these campaigns, I'm

0:26:19.887 --> 0:26:22.447
<v Speaker 2>like having a lot of angxety conversations about whether or

0:26:22.487 --> 0:26:23.887
<v Speaker 2>not that's going to happen, and should it be a

0:26:23.967 --> 0:26:27.087
<v Speaker 2>dumb phone? Should it only have texting on it? Like

0:26:27.207 --> 0:26:29.047
<v Speaker 2>it's changing everybody's opinion.

0:26:28.967 --> 0:26:31.247
<v Speaker 5>Out Louders, We'll put a link if you're interested to

0:26:31.327 --> 0:26:34.247
<v Speaker 5>that petition in the show notes. Of course, like any petition,

0:26:34.487 --> 0:26:38.487
<v Speaker 5>read a bit about it before you sign. Out Louders.

0:26:38.527 --> 0:26:40.287
<v Speaker 2>If you want to listen to us every day of

0:26:40.287 --> 0:26:42.887
<v Speaker 2>the week, and why wouldn't you, you can get access

0:26:42.927 --> 0:26:46.647
<v Speaker 2>to exclusive segments on Tuesdays and Thursdays by becoming a

0:26:46.687 --> 0:26:49.887
<v Speaker 2>MoMA mea subscriber. Follow the link in the show notes

0:26:49.887 --> 0:26:52.807
<v Speaker 2>to subscribe, and a big thank you to all our

0:26:52.887 --> 0:26:59.487
<v Speaker 2>current subscribers. On May the twenty seventh, one of the

0:26:59.527 --> 0:27:03.487
<v Speaker 2>most famous of all celebrity offspring changed her name. Now

0:27:03.527 --> 0:27:05.687
<v Speaker 2>it might be because I worked in gossip magazines at

0:27:05.727 --> 0:27:07.807
<v Speaker 2>the time and we were literally on the phone to

0:27:07.807 --> 0:27:10.487
<v Speaker 2>a photographer who was dressed in camo and hiding behind

0:27:10.487 --> 0:27:13.047
<v Speaker 2>a sand dune in the Namibian desert when it happened.

0:27:13.567 --> 0:27:14.847
<v Speaker 5>But I remember very.

0:27:14.647 --> 0:27:17.287
<v Speaker 2>Clearly the day that Shiloh Jolly Pitt, as she was

0:27:17.327 --> 0:27:21.167
<v Speaker 2>then called, was born. Now she's eighteen, which makes me

0:27:21.367 --> 0:27:24.487
<v Speaker 2>one hundred and five. But funnily enough, the way that

0:27:24.527 --> 0:27:27.087
<v Speaker 2>Shiloh marked that day was not to send me a

0:27:27.087 --> 0:27:29.687
<v Speaker 2>thank you card for my creepy and unethical interest in

0:27:29.727 --> 0:27:33.887
<v Speaker 2>her life, but by filing a court order to drop

0:27:33.927 --> 0:27:38.487
<v Speaker 2>the word pit from her name. Shiloh is now Shiloh Jolly,

0:27:38.607 --> 0:27:40.527
<v Speaker 2>or at least she will be if this court order

0:27:40.567 --> 0:27:44.087
<v Speaker 2>goes through, like her sister before her, Zahara, who introduced

0:27:44.087 --> 0:27:50.047
<v Speaker 2>herself recently in a recent college video as Zahara Marley Jolie. Now,

0:27:50.087 --> 0:27:52.887
<v Speaker 2>if you, unlike me, are not deeply steeped in the

0:27:52.927 --> 0:27:57.367
<v Speaker 2>mythology and law of this family, just very very quick

0:27:57.407 --> 0:27:59.847
<v Speaker 2>top line, because jem, you're probably a little bit young

0:27:59.887 --> 0:28:02.247
<v Speaker 2>to be as obsessed with the Joy Pitt situation.

0:28:01.927 --> 0:28:04.247
<v Speaker 5>As I am. I have the basics, you have the basics.

0:28:04.407 --> 0:28:08.927
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie for almost fifteen years

0:28:08.927 --> 0:28:13.527
<v Speaker 2>were the pinnacle of fabulous celebrity couples. We were obsessed

0:28:13.607 --> 0:28:17.087
<v Speaker 2>with them in a way that seems yes creepy indeed.

0:28:17.647 --> 0:28:20.887
<v Speaker 2>And during that time they had six kids, three adopted kids,

0:28:20.927 --> 0:28:23.887
<v Speaker 2>three biological kids, and they were very famous for traveling

0:28:23.887 --> 0:28:26.727
<v Speaker 2>the world as a big, gorgeous group, right. They were

0:28:26.767 --> 0:28:31.007
<v Speaker 2>always off running humanitarian missions for the UN and making

0:28:31.087 --> 0:28:33.927
<v Speaker 2>movies and living in a gorgeous French chateau that really

0:28:34.007 --> 0:28:38.487
<v Speaker 2>was a chateau andlke Britney Higgins's farmhouse on a vineyard

0:28:38.567 --> 0:28:41.327
<v Speaker 2>called Miraval, which makes really nice rose but is now

0:28:41.447 --> 0:28:44.087
<v Speaker 2>one of their many battlefields. Not allowed to buy it anymore.

0:28:44.927 --> 0:28:48.047
<v Speaker 2>They've been separated for almost ten years, which is wild, right,

0:28:48.127 --> 0:28:51.047
<v Speaker 2>But all that time, that whole time, the most bitter

0:28:51.407 --> 0:28:55.847
<v Speaker 2>of court battles has been going on about money, about custody,

0:28:56.007 --> 0:28:59.087
<v Speaker 2>about divorce settlement, and most of this hangs on the

0:28:59.167 --> 0:29:03.207
<v Speaker 2>fact that Jolie says that when she knew that marriage

0:29:03.247 --> 0:29:05.687
<v Speaker 2>was over, it was after an incident on a private

0:29:05.767 --> 0:29:08.767
<v Speaker 2>jet that was flying from France to the US where

0:29:08.807 --> 0:29:13.287
<v Speaker 2>brad It drunkenly assaulted her and the children, and ever

0:29:13.367 --> 0:29:16.127
<v Speaker 2>since then she and the children have had very little

0:29:16.127 --> 0:29:20.487
<v Speaker 2>to do with him, even though he officially has shared custody,

0:29:21.047 --> 0:29:23.527
<v Speaker 2>any statement that he's ever made about it publicly, he

0:29:23.607 --> 0:29:25.967
<v Speaker 2>said that he immediately went to rehab, that he's completely

0:29:26.007 --> 0:29:29.127
<v Speaker 2>cleaned himself up, and he and his camp deny all

0:29:29.167 --> 0:29:31.327
<v Speaker 2>the Jolly allegations, or most of them anyway.

0:29:31.407 --> 0:29:33.487
<v Speaker 5>Right, But it's clear that.

0:29:33.447 --> 0:29:35.487
<v Speaker 2>Obviously the kids are team Angelina so much so they

0:29:35.487 --> 0:29:37.407
<v Speaker 2>probably have the sort of T shirts that we used

0:29:37.407 --> 0:29:39.127
<v Speaker 2>to wear back in the naughties when it was Team

0:29:39.167 --> 0:29:42.847
<v Speaker 2>gener or Team An. They're definitely team n But here's

0:29:42.887 --> 0:29:45.567
<v Speaker 2>the thing, right, after all that Pitt is not canceled,

0:29:46.207 --> 0:29:48.967
<v Speaker 2>despite those allegations that he's an abusive alcoholic or he

0:29:49.007 --> 0:29:51.287
<v Speaker 2>was an abusive alcoholic during their marriage, and the fact

0:29:51.327 --> 0:29:53.327
<v Speaker 2>that none of his children want anything to do with him,

0:29:53.567 --> 0:29:56.527
<v Speaker 2>and some of them have spoken out about that relatively publicly.

0:29:57.527 --> 0:30:01.487
<v Speaker 2>He is still the one who is in a multimillion

0:30:01.607 --> 0:30:05.167
<v Speaker 2>dollar body movie with George Clooney that's coming to a cinema.

0:30:04.847 --> 0:30:05.487
<v Speaker 5>Near us soon.

0:30:05.967 --> 0:30:08.967
<v Speaker 2>And every time you write about this story or talk

0:30:08.967 --> 0:30:12.847
<v Speaker 2>about this story, the vitriol that comes from it is

0:30:13.007 --> 0:30:17.847
<v Speaker 2>directed at Angelina Jolly always, always so, even on Mama Mia.

0:30:17.887 --> 0:30:21.767
<v Speaker 2>And we have a very you know, female inclusive, wonderful audience,

0:30:21.887 --> 0:30:24.367
<v Speaker 2>many of whom obviously they want to read about this stuff,

0:30:24.647 --> 0:30:28.167
<v Speaker 2>But they'll often say, well, it's Angelina, you know, it's Angelina.

0:30:28.207 --> 0:30:30.927
<v Speaker 5>That's she's She's turned the kids against him. She's just

0:30:30.927 --> 0:30:32.247
<v Speaker 5>turned the kids against him.

0:30:32.727 --> 0:30:35.207
<v Speaker 2>Certainly in other parts of the mainstream media, that's very

0:30:35.287 --> 0:30:38.327
<v Speaker 2>much the vibe is it's kind of poor Brad. He

0:30:38.407 --> 0:30:40.527
<v Speaker 2>was wrestling with demons, but that piece of work has

0:30:40.567 --> 0:30:44.767
<v Speaker 2>taken him down. Why do women love to hate Angelina

0:30:44.847 --> 0:30:46.327
<v Speaker 2>Jolly because of Jennifer?

0:30:46.647 --> 0:30:49.487
<v Speaker 5>Do you think really? Still? I do? I think that

0:30:49.607 --> 0:30:53.647
<v Speaker 5>stuff sticks, which is so strange given how much longer

0:30:54.087 --> 0:30:57.487
<v Speaker 5>Brad and Angelina were married. I think so much of

0:30:57.527 --> 0:30:59.727
<v Speaker 5>it comes down to, you know, going back to the

0:30:59.767 --> 0:31:05.447
<v Speaker 5>sort of nineties celebrity canon, Jennifer Aniston going out with

0:31:05.487 --> 0:31:07.807
<v Speaker 5>Brad Pitt with such a big deal in our culture

0:31:07.967 --> 0:31:12.447
<v Speaker 5>because she was incredibly famous, but she was very girl

0:31:12.487 --> 0:31:18.247
<v Speaker 5>next door, whereas he was like heart throb, whole other level,

0:31:18.327 --> 0:31:21.887
<v Speaker 5>and it was seen that him choosing to date her

0:31:22.287 --> 0:31:25.887
<v Speaker 5>was a victory for every girl who wasn't a sexy bombshell.

0:31:26.887 --> 0:31:29.727
<v Speaker 5>And then along came Angelina and that relationship clearly did

0:31:29.767 --> 0:31:32.407
<v Speaker 5>start while he was still married to Jennifer Andiston. They

0:31:32.407 --> 0:31:34.847
<v Speaker 5>were co starring in that movie Mister and Missus Smith

0:31:34.847 --> 0:31:38.167
<v Speaker 5>together and look, that kind of thing happens all the time.

0:31:38.207 --> 0:31:42.207
<v Speaker 5>It's not the first relationship or marriage that's been ended

0:31:42.407 --> 0:31:46.407
<v Speaker 5>by an affair. But there was something about it that

0:31:46.487 --> 0:31:50.567
<v Speaker 5>people turned against. I think because Jennifer Inniston's heartbreak was

0:31:51.287 --> 0:31:56.287
<v Speaker 5>so public, everybody identified with her, and even though Brad

0:31:56.487 --> 0:32:00.327
<v Speaker 5>Pitt was forgiven, Angelina kind of never was. That's the

0:32:00.447 --> 0:32:01.487
<v Speaker 5>thing that's wild about it.

0:32:01.527 --> 0:32:04.407
<v Speaker 2>I bet your generation thinks it's wild gem in particular

0:32:04.487 --> 0:32:07.287
<v Speaker 2>because Brad Pitt got through all that Team gen t

0:32:07.447 --> 0:32:09.847
<v Speaker 2>managed stuff scott free, even though he was the one

0:32:10.327 --> 0:32:13.367
<v Speaker 2>who cheated on America's sweetheart, and the villain of the

0:32:13.367 --> 0:32:16.327
<v Speaker 2>piece was Angelina. And it's interesting that all these years

0:32:16.367 --> 0:32:19.127
<v Speaker 2>later and in the interim, let's be clear about it.

0:32:19.167 --> 0:32:23.327
<v Speaker 2>Angelina Jolie is a humanitarian who is often recognized by

0:32:23.407 --> 0:32:26.527
<v Speaker 2>international organizations as having really moved the dial on a

0:32:26.607 --> 0:32:30.767
<v Speaker 2>whole lot of causes, particularly refugees. She has clearly been

0:32:30.807 --> 0:32:33.807
<v Speaker 2>a very devoted parent to those kids. She's always with them.

0:32:34.247 --> 0:32:36.167
<v Speaker 2>I know there are some cynics who are like, well, yeah,

0:32:36.167 --> 0:32:38.207
<v Speaker 2>she wheels them out, but I don't think that's true.

0:32:38.247 --> 0:32:41.007
<v Speaker 5>I just think that's bullshit. That's what I'm saying, Katie Holmes,

0:32:41.007 --> 0:32:43.847
<v Speaker 5>wheels out tzuri. It's called parenting exactly.

0:32:44.007 --> 0:32:46.407
<v Speaker 2>Those kids are now aged between fifteen and twenty two,

0:32:46.447 --> 0:32:48.807
<v Speaker 2>and they're choosing how public or not they want to be. Obviously,

0:32:48.807 --> 0:32:50.447
<v Speaker 2>when they were little kids, they had no choice. They

0:32:50.447 --> 0:32:53.327
<v Speaker 2>were hounded by the paparazzi. It was disturbing.

0:32:53.567 --> 0:32:56.687
<v Speaker 5>So in twenty twenty, Pax wrote on his social media,

0:32:56.727 --> 0:32:59.687
<v Speaker 5>which was private at the time that has since come out,

0:33:00.247 --> 0:33:03.167
<v Speaker 5>Happy Father's Day to this world class asshole with a

0:33:03.167 --> 0:33:05.607
<v Speaker 5>picture of Brad Pitt. You time and time again prove

0:33:05.647 --> 0:33:08.327
<v Speaker 5>yourself to be a terrible and despicable person. You have

0:33:08.367 --> 0:33:11.127
<v Speaker 5>no consideration or empathy towards your four youngest children, who

0:33:11.127 --> 0:33:14.007
<v Speaker 5>tremble in fear, when in your presence you've made the

0:33:14.047 --> 0:33:16.447
<v Speaker 5>lives of those closest to me a constant hell. You

0:33:16.487 --> 0:33:18.567
<v Speaker 5>may tell yourself and the world whatever you want, but

0:33:18.607 --> 0:33:21.047
<v Speaker 5>the truth will come to light someday. So Happy Father's Day,

0:33:21.087 --> 0:33:23.607
<v Speaker 5>you fucking awful human being. They're at the age now

0:33:23.607 --> 0:33:26.247
<v Speaker 5>where they can choose where they want to be and

0:33:26.367 --> 0:33:28.847
<v Speaker 5>who want to spend time with. And even though this

0:33:28.927 --> 0:33:31.447
<v Speaker 5>case has gone on and on and on, drawn out

0:33:31.527 --> 0:33:34.767
<v Speaker 5>by Brad Pitt, it must be noted who feeds the

0:33:34.807 --> 0:33:39.127
<v Speaker 5>press and manipulates the press constantly and feeds this narrative

0:33:39.687 --> 0:33:44.167
<v Speaker 5>of what a witch Angelina Jolie is the fact that

0:33:44.207 --> 0:33:47.487
<v Speaker 5>Shiloh's done this is a real clapback. It's a real

0:33:47.567 --> 0:33:49.887
<v Speaker 5>statement without making a statement.

0:33:50.047 --> 0:33:52.607
<v Speaker 2>Why do you think Brad Pitt hasn't been canceled, Jim, I.

0:33:52.567 --> 0:33:56.567
<v Speaker 3>Don't think my generation and the generations below me care

0:33:56.967 --> 0:33:59.527
<v Speaker 3>about Brad and Angela as much as your generation.

0:33:59.967 --> 0:34:03.967
<v Speaker 2>She said, Angela Angelina Angelena see.

0:34:03.807 --> 0:34:05.607
<v Speaker 1>Perfect illustration what I mean.

0:34:06.287 --> 0:34:08.167
<v Speaker 4>They've moved on Bob and Angela.

0:34:08.407 --> 0:34:10.247
<v Speaker 5>No one really care about them.

0:34:10.807 --> 0:34:14.487
<v Speaker 3>So back when I was a teenager, I was keeping

0:34:14.527 --> 0:34:15.887
<v Speaker 3>on top of them blah blah blah.

0:34:15.927 --> 0:34:18.287
<v Speaker 4>But I did feel that they were the celebrities.

0:34:17.767 --> 0:34:18.647
<v Speaker 1>Of your generation.

0:34:19.487 --> 0:34:22.607
<v Speaker 3>And your generation is still in this kind of cycle

0:34:22.767 --> 0:34:25.887
<v Speaker 3>of looking at what happened on that plane and Angelina.

0:34:25.967 --> 0:34:26.767
<v Speaker 1>We're not even.

0:34:26.607 --> 0:34:30.967
<v Speaker 3>Talking about them, like really, they're talking about the Bridgeton

0:34:31.087 --> 0:34:32.527
<v Speaker 3>stars and whether they're together.

0:34:32.727 --> 0:34:33.567
<v Speaker 1>Like I don't.

0:34:33.367 --> 0:34:35.847
<v Speaker 3>Remember the last movie that Angelina was in. It's very

0:34:35.887 --> 0:34:37.527
<v Speaker 3>much a gen X obsession, but.

0:34:40.047 --> 0:34:43.567
<v Speaker 5>I do, of course, I didn't got an icon. I'm

0:34:43.567 --> 0:34:46.727
<v Speaker 5>not saying like, is he this is. My issue is.

0:34:48.447 --> 0:34:50.407
<v Speaker 2>Whether you like him or not is an icon. It's

0:34:50.407 --> 0:34:52.327
<v Speaker 2>not your opinion whether he's an icon. He is one

0:34:52.367 --> 0:34:56.247
<v Speaker 2>of the richest defensive It's not Holly.

0:34:56.527 --> 0:34:59.167
<v Speaker 5>You can't tell someone who an icon is, but why

0:34:59.447 --> 0:35:02.727
<v Speaker 5>Hollywood icon like he is. He's definitely a Holly dot

0:35:02.767 --> 0:35:03.327
<v Speaker 5>com icon.

0:35:04.407 --> 0:35:06.647
<v Speaker 3>But the reason he hasn't been canceled is, and I

0:35:06.687 --> 0:35:09.047
<v Speaker 3>was thinking about this, their words on a page.

0:35:09.767 --> 0:35:14.567
<v Speaker 4>So only a few weeks ago we saw literal footage.

0:35:14.087 --> 0:35:19.287
<v Speaker 3>Of Cassie Ventura being physically assaulted by Sean Diddy Coombs.

0:35:19.647 --> 0:35:23.047
<v Speaker 3>We watched it, we saw it, and we all got outraged.

0:35:23.527 --> 0:35:26.687
<v Speaker 3>Many years after the fact, I read the details of

0:35:26.727 --> 0:35:30.367
<v Speaker 3>what happened on that plane allegedly and they are insane.

0:35:30.487 --> 0:35:34.007
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's disturbing, and if there was a video of it,

0:35:34.247 --> 0:35:35.887
<v Speaker 2>everyone everyone would care.

0:35:36.007 --> 0:35:36.847
<v Speaker 5>But because it is.

0:35:36.807 --> 0:35:39.127
<v Speaker 2>Words on a page, even though those words have been

0:35:39.167 --> 0:35:42.527
<v Speaker 2>submitted to court and aren't really contested. I mean, I

0:35:42.567 --> 0:35:45.727
<v Speaker 2>think obviously pits people think they're overblown, but they haven't

0:35:45.767 --> 0:35:49.767
<v Speaker 2>completely denied that it all happened. Somehow, there's still room

0:35:49.807 --> 0:35:51.287
<v Speaker 2>there for us to not believe a woman.

0:35:51.447 --> 0:35:54.807
<v Speaker 3>But I think it's also Angelina is a very private person. Nowadays,

0:35:54.847 --> 0:35:56.527
<v Speaker 3>we don't know a lot about her personal life. We

0:35:56.567 --> 0:35:58.647
<v Speaker 3>don't see what she's drinking in the morning, we don't

0:35:58.687 --> 0:35:59.447
<v Speaker 3>see any of that.

0:35:59.567 --> 0:36:00.727
<v Speaker 5>She doesn't play the Hollywood No.

0:36:01.207 --> 0:36:04.607
<v Speaker 2>Social media is wall to wall refugee advocacy. She does

0:36:04.647 --> 0:36:06.407
<v Speaker 2>not do outfit of the day.

0:36:06.647 --> 0:36:11.647
<v Speaker 4>She does not, especially your narration. They're struggling to get

0:36:11.687 --> 0:36:14.687
<v Speaker 4>to know her because she's not that personal.

0:36:14.287 --> 0:36:16.607
<v Speaker 5>On social I feel like I know her. I feel,

0:36:17.087 --> 0:36:18.647
<v Speaker 5>you know what, I think this story has got a

0:36:18.687 --> 0:36:21.727
<v Speaker 5>long way to play, because I think Angelina is playing

0:36:21.767 --> 0:36:25.087
<v Speaker 5>the long game. I think that one day in the future,

0:36:25.727 --> 0:36:29.167
<v Speaker 5>those children will talk about what happened on that plane,

0:36:29.327 --> 0:36:31.887
<v Speaker 5>and for all we know, they do have footage of it,

0:36:32.247 --> 0:36:36.167
<v Speaker 5>but they're choosing not to, you know, reveal it. I

0:36:36.327 --> 0:36:39.807
<v Speaker 5>get the sense that Angelina Julie is a phenomenal mother,

0:36:40.687 --> 0:36:44.767
<v Speaker 5>and I feel like she would disadvantage herself if it

0:36:44.847 --> 0:36:47.927
<v Speaker 5>meant protecting her children. I don't get that same sense

0:36:47.967 --> 0:36:48.927
<v Speaker 5>about Brad Pitt. No.

0:36:49.527 --> 0:36:51.287
<v Speaker 2>I have to be on the record that I have

0:36:51.487 --> 0:36:54.527
<v Speaker 2>finally in my heart canceled him Mia After.

0:36:54.327 --> 0:36:56.527
<v Speaker 5>All this what does that look like? Though? So it

0:36:56.567 --> 0:37:01.287
<v Speaker 5>looks like taking the posters off your wall, because here's

0:37:01.287 --> 0:37:02.327
<v Speaker 5>the thing about cancelation.

0:37:02.447 --> 0:37:04.447
<v Speaker 2>MEA and I argue about cancelation quite a lot. But

0:37:05.447 --> 0:37:07.967
<v Speaker 2>if you really like somebody's work and you've admired them

0:37:07.967 --> 0:37:10.127
<v Speaker 2>and then the shit comes out about them, sometimes it

0:37:10.167 --> 0:37:12.487
<v Speaker 2>can take some time for that to sink in and

0:37:12.527 --> 0:37:14.767
<v Speaker 2>then you're like, Oh, the way that I know I've

0:37:14.767 --> 0:37:16.847
<v Speaker 2>canceled him in my heart now is that when I

0:37:16.887 --> 0:37:19.687
<v Speaker 2>see him now in things, and I'm on the record

0:37:19.687 --> 0:37:21.567
<v Speaker 2>of being a big brad Pit fan out loud is

0:37:21.527 --> 0:37:24.887
<v Speaker 2>always sending me brad Pit videos when I see him now,

0:37:24.927 --> 0:37:28.087
<v Speaker 2>particularly this version of him, not the young version of him.

0:37:28.727 --> 0:37:30.607
<v Speaker 2>I watched the trailer of the movie that he and

0:37:30.647 --> 0:37:34.167
<v Speaker 2>Cludey are in. It's called Wolves, and I bet it's good, Like,

0:37:34.167 --> 0:37:35.967
<v Speaker 2>I bet it is, I bet they're funny. I bet

0:37:36.007 --> 0:37:38.207
<v Speaker 2>it's all that stuff. It's like a Buddy movie, hit Man,

0:37:38.207 --> 0:37:41.087
<v Speaker 2>Buddy movie, whatever. But I was like, I got the

0:37:41.127 --> 0:37:45.047
<v Speaker 2>ick and that happened. Similarly, there's a musician I used

0:37:45.047 --> 0:37:47.207
<v Speaker 2>to love called Ryan Adams. I've seen him in concert

0:37:47.247 --> 0:37:51.127
<v Speaker 2>a million times, and when he was canceled, I was like, Oh,

0:37:51.127 --> 0:37:53.567
<v Speaker 2>I shouldn't listen anymore. But the thing is is that

0:37:53.647 --> 0:37:55.487
<v Speaker 2>I still love the music. But then it sort of

0:37:55.527 --> 0:37:57.887
<v Speaker 2>seeps in and you're like, I can't listen anymore because

0:37:57.927 --> 0:38:00.727
<v Speaker 2>the person who I thought was writing those songs and

0:38:00.767 --> 0:38:03.767
<v Speaker 2>singing those songs, it's not who I thought you were.

0:38:03.807 --> 0:38:06.607
<v Speaker 2>And now I can't listen without going So when the

0:38:06.647 --> 0:38:09.887
<v Speaker 2>it comes, you can't do the IgG. If you want

0:38:09.927 --> 0:38:12.327
<v Speaker 2>to listen to some more on this story, The Spill

0:38:12.447 --> 0:38:15.927
<v Speaker 2>our entertainment podcast, our daily entertainment podcast, is covering it too.

0:38:16.327 --> 0:38:18.327
<v Speaker 5>Question for the group, is it too soon to joke

0:38:18.367 --> 0:38:23.527
<v Speaker 5>about COVID? And also, if you've got COVID, do you

0:38:23.567 --> 0:38:28.807
<v Speaker 5>still stay home? Yes, well, my parents are on the road.

0:38:29.127 --> 0:38:31.967
<v Speaker 5>Well they're in like some outback place with COVID. No

0:38:32.007 --> 0:38:34.847
<v Speaker 5>one really cares about their COVID. I mean, I care

0:38:34.887 --> 0:38:37.727
<v Speaker 5>about their COVID, but they're, you know, renting this little

0:38:37.807 --> 0:38:40.687
<v Speaker 5>hut somewhere. They were leaving and they were like, oh,

0:38:40.687 --> 0:38:42.527
<v Speaker 5>but we've had COVID and do you need And they're like, oh, no,

0:38:42.567 --> 0:38:44.287
<v Speaker 5>I don't worry. We just wipe it down, like you

0:38:44.447 --> 0:38:47.927
<v Speaker 5>remember when there were people in hazmat suits. Anyway, we

0:38:48.007 --> 0:38:50.447
<v Speaker 5>had a conversation about this on a segment on our

0:38:50.487 --> 0:38:56.407
<v Speaker 5>subs episode because Lady Gaga made a very scandalous admission. Well,

0:38:56.447 --> 0:38:58.927
<v Speaker 5>some people were just like, that's long, that's funny. Other

0:38:58.967 --> 0:39:01.487
<v Speaker 5>people were very upset about it. Here's a little sneak peak.

0:39:02.127 --> 0:39:05.647
<v Speaker 7>I think she was being cavalier about it, and I

0:39:05.687 --> 0:39:06.127
<v Speaker 7>think that.

0:39:06.207 --> 0:39:07.687
<v Speaker 5>Do you think it was, Alex. Do you think she

0:39:07.727 --> 0:39:08.647
<v Speaker 5>said it like a flex?

0:39:09.487 --> 0:39:12.887
<v Speaker 7>The look on her face was can you believe I

0:39:12.887 --> 0:39:15.727
<v Speaker 7>did a quarter of these concerts with COVID. It's the

0:39:15.767 --> 0:39:18.967
<v Speaker 7>one thing. Whether or not she literally transmitted COVID. I

0:39:19.007 --> 0:39:23.127
<v Speaker 7>mean maybe they had incredible constraints, which meant that she

0:39:23.207 --> 0:39:27.127
<v Speaker 7>didn't whatever normalizing it. And that's what she really did,

0:39:27.287 --> 0:39:29.447
<v Speaker 7>was she went I was able to get up and

0:39:29.527 --> 0:39:31.687
<v Speaker 7>do a concept and do all of that with COVID.

0:39:31.887 --> 0:39:35.087
<v Speaker 7>I don't know if that's like a great message to normalize.

0:39:35.527 --> 0:39:40.207
<v Speaker 5>We're going back to the soldier soldier runs, and I

0:39:40.247 --> 0:39:43.127
<v Speaker 5>think that we're also judgmental, whether we admit it or not,

0:39:43.767 --> 0:39:46.607
<v Speaker 5>of people who take COVID more seriously or who are

0:39:46.607 --> 0:39:49.447
<v Speaker 5>harder hit by COVID than other people. A link to

0:39:49.487 --> 0:39:52.527
<v Speaker 5>that episode and our conversation will be in the show notes.

0:39:53.007 --> 0:39:55.367
<v Speaker 2>Java bas thank you, thank you, thank you for filling

0:39:55.407 --> 0:39:58.727
<v Speaker 2>in for our Jesse Stevens. My pleasure and thank you

0:39:58.767 --> 0:40:00.607
<v Speaker 2>to all out louders who've listened to us today and

0:40:00.647 --> 0:40:01.847
<v Speaker 2>our brilliant production team for.

0:40:01.767 --> 0:40:03.727
<v Speaker 5>Helping us put this show together. We will see you

0:40:03.767 --> 0:40:09.247
<v Speaker 5>all tomorrow. Why shout out to any Mum of Mes

0:40:09.327 --> 0:40:11.967
<v Speaker 5>drivers listening. If you love the show and want to

0:40:12.007 --> 0:40:14.647
<v Speaker 5>support us as well, subscribing to Mom and Miya is

0:40:14.687 --> 0:40:16.647
<v Speaker 5>the very best way to do so. There is a

0:40:16.727 --> 0:40:21.487
<v Speaker 5>link in the episode description. Do you know as we're

0:40:21.527 --> 0:40:25.127
<v Speaker 5>recording this, Jesse is taking off at the beginning of

0:40:25.367 --> 0:40:28.367
<v Speaker 5>I think it's like a forty five hour stop journey

0:40:28.927 --> 0:40:29.847
<v Speaker 5>with a ten month old.

0:40:30.287 --> 0:40:34.367
<v Speaker 2>That's hell hell on wheels, literally, hell on wings. I

0:40:34.407 --> 0:40:36.687
<v Speaker 2>bet she's done that thing where she's got lollibags for

0:40:36.727 --> 0:40:37.687
<v Speaker 2>the other people to be like.

0:40:37.727 --> 0:40:41.127
<v Speaker 5>I'm sorry about that. Sounds like something Jesse said, I

0:40:41.207 --> 0:40:41.687
<v Speaker 5>might do it.

0:40:41.967 --> 0:40:43.807
<v Speaker 1>I'm about to do a six hour flight and I'm

0:40:43.847 --> 0:40:47.127
<v Speaker 1>dreading that. Yes, let alone a forty four hour flight.

0:40:47.207 --> 0:40:49.287
<v Speaker 5>Apparently what they say is don't start walking up and

0:40:49.327 --> 0:40:52.007
<v Speaker 5>down the aisles, because once you start, you have to

0:40:52.567 --> 0:40:55.847
<v Speaker 5>you're going to do. You have wants to be suffer.

0:40:56.007 --> 0:40:58.007
<v Speaker 2>You have to leave that till towards the end.

0:40:58.167 --> 0:40:59.447
<v Speaker 5>Oh well, thoughts I pressed with Jesse