WEBVTT - So That's The Reason I Feel Bad About… My Eyelids?

0:00:08.234 --> 0:00:10.914
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to a mother and mea podcast.

0:00:15.874 --> 0:00:18.514
<v Speaker 2>Hello and welcome to momam are out loud. It's what

0:00:18.553 --> 0:00:21.674
<v Speaker 2>women are actually talking about. On Wednesday, the nineteenth of

0:00:21.954 --> 0:00:24.794
<v Speaker 2>I was going to say October nov my.

0:00:24.834 --> 0:00:27.794
<v Speaker 1>Name is Hollywayen Right, I'm Amelia Luster and.

0:00:27.794 --> 0:00:30.874
<v Speaker 3>I'm Jesse Stevens. I've been in New Zealand for a

0:00:30.874 --> 0:00:31.514
<v Speaker 3>few days.

0:00:31.754 --> 0:00:33.394
<v Speaker 4>Claire is back.

0:00:33.473 --> 0:00:35.754
<v Speaker 3>She's going to be back for Friday's episode because I

0:00:35.793 --> 0:00:39.034
<v Speaker 3>have a very very big week just on New Zealand.

0:00:39.634 --> 0:00:41.994
<v Speaker 4>Have either of you seen Lord of the Rings?

0:00:42.314 --> 0:00:45.273
<v Speaker 1>I watched it every single year around New Year's Eve.

0:00:45.553 --> 0:00:48.194
<v Speaker 4>Really like all of them, love it. Have you seen

0:00:48.193 --> 0:00:49.394
<v Speaker 4>the Hobbit Yeah?

0:00:49.434 --> 0:00:49.954
<v Speaker 1>Not as good.

0:00:50.034 --> 0:00:51.834
<v Speaker 4>The out loud as are horrified that I've never seen

0:00:51.873 --> 0:00:53.594
<v Speaker 4>Lord of the Rings? Very really mad.

0:00:53.714 --> 0:00:56.074
<v Speaker 2>How have you managed to live your life and avoid that?

0:00:56.234 --> 0:00:58.954
<v Speaker 3>I've had people try and force me, sit me down,

0:00:59.034 --> 0:01:01.434
<v Speaker 3>and I just I can't watch more than about.

0:01:01.234 --> 0:01:02.114
<v Speaker 4>Six minutes of it.

0:01:02.194 --> 0:01:03.234
<v Speaker 2>So did you go to Hobbiton?

0:01:03.354 --> 0:01:05.033
<v Speaker 4>I went to Hobbiton, which I love.

0:01:05.314 --> 0:01:07.594
<v Speaker 2>Did you understand Hobbiton? If you haven't in any.

0:01:07.434 --> 0:01:08.794
<v Speaker 4>Of these totally did?

0:01:09.434 --> 0:01:10.913
<v Speaker 2>What's this strange little place?

0:01:11.274 --> 0:01:12.594
<v Speaker 4>Why is it all so little?

0:01:13.154 --> 0:01:15.594
<v Speaker 3>I actually really really rated it. I thought it was

0:01:15.634 --> 0:01:17.314
<v Speaker 3>awesome and was there with the two year old who

0:01:17.354 --> 0:01:20.314
<v Speaker 3>just went it's the city made for me. Yeah, you

0:01:20.354 --> 0:01:22.074
<v Speaker 3>get to go into one of the houses and play

0:01:22.114 --> 0:01:23.554
<v Speaker 3>with things and stuff, which was awesome.

0:01:23.994 --> 0:01:26.554
<v Speaker 1>But I would love to do that. And you haven't

0:01:26.594 --> 0:01:27.514
<v Speaker 1>even watched.

0:01:27.354 --> 0:01:29.714
<v Speaker 4>I know, I know it's sick.

0:01:29.794 --> 0:01:32.674
<v Speaker 3>It's incredible, and I just appreciated the movie set element.

0:01:32.714 --> 0:01:35.514
<v Speaker 3>That's like the biggest movie set in the world. But yet, nah,

0:01:35.554 --> 0:01:36.594
<v Speaker 3>I haven't read it.

0:01:36.954 --> 0:01:37.634
<v Speaker 4>Have you read it?

0:01:37.914 --> 0:01:39.314
<v Speaker 2>I read it when I was a kid. My dad

0:01:39.314 --> 0:01:39.874
<v Speaker 2>read it to me.

0:01:40.714 --> 0:01:40.914
<v Speaker 4>I know.

0:01:42.194 --> 0:01:44.634
<v Speaker 2>Brent's obsessed. He's one of those well he's a key

0:01:44.634 --> 0:01:47.274
<v Speaker 2>way of course, he's completely obsessed. He's got all the

0:01:47.354 --> 0:01:49.794
<v Speaker 2>director's cuts. He tries to make the kids watch it

0:01:49.834 --> 0:01:52.074
<v Speaker 2>all the time. Billy has been reading it and he

0:01:52.194 --> 0:01:53.594
<v Speaker 2>kind of got yeah, it's the whole thing. You got

0:01:53.634 --> 0:01:54.994
<v Speaker 2>to get into order the rings.

0:01:55.114 --> 0:01:56.354
<v Speaker 4>Do I have to watch it?

0:01:56.474 --> 0:02:03.754
<v Speaker 2>Actually, yes, in it and he's like, really really hot. Actually,

0:02:03.834 --> 0:02:07.994
<v Speaker 2>Orlando is probably more your thing, young Orlando Blue is

0:02:08.034 --> 0:02:09.354
<v Speaker 2>the elf king hotness.

0:02:09.594 --> 0:02:13.074
<v Speaker 4>Okay, all right, I'll give it. Yeah, he lost me

0:02:13.073 --> 0:02:15.874
<v Speaker 4>at elf King, but I like the hotness.

0:02:16.994 --> 0:02:20.554
<v Speaker 2>Dear anyway, here's what's made our agenda today. Eyelids are

0:02:20.554 --> 0:02:23.233
<v Speaker 2>over and there's an essay that everybody has to read

0:02:23.434 --> 0:02:25.554
<v Speaker 2>about surgery. These are just a couple of the silly

0:02:25.594 --> 0:02:27.674
<v Speaker 2>things around about women's faces this week.

0:02:27.914 --> 0:02:31.234
<v Speaker 1>And millennials aren't having affairs anymore. I want to talk

0:02:31.234 --> 0:02:32.994
<v Speaker 1>about whether that's a good thing or a bad thing.

0:02:33.474 --> 0:02:34.474
<v Speaker 4>And state funerals.

0:02:34.514 --> 0:02:38.914
<v Speaker 3>Two prominent Australians have been offered and accepted them in

0:02:38.954 --> 0:02:41.154
<v Speaker 3>the last few weeks, and we discuss what that means

0:02:41.154 --> 0:02:43.594
<v Speaker 3>and why a lot of people are very, very mad.

0:02:43.914 --> 0:02:47.474
<v Speaker 2>Well, first, in case you missed it, Michelle Obama, which

0:02:47.474 --> 0:02:49.114
<v Speaker 2>he's been saying a lot of good stuff lately. We

0:02:49.234 --> 0:02:51.714
<v Speaker 2>remember we talked about her last week with her parenting advice.

0:02:52.194 --> 0:02:54.914
<v Speaker 2>But I have one question from Melia lest after you

0:02:54.994 --> 0:02:58.794
<v Speaker 2>hear this little bit about Michelle Obama talking about women

0:02:59.034 --> 0:02:59.954
<v Speaker 2>running for president.

0:03:00.434 --> 0:03:04.994
<v Speaker 5>As we saw in this past election, sadly we ain't ready.

0:03:06.114 --> 0:03:08.754
<v Speaker 5>That's why I'm like, don't even look at me about running,

0:03:08.754 --> 0:03:11.954
<v Speaker 5>because you all are lying you're not ready for a woman.

0:03:12.274 --> 0:03:15.994
<v Speaker 5>You are not, so don't waste my time. You know,

0:03:16.354 --> 0:03:18.754
<v Speaker 5>we had a lot of growing up to do, and

0:03:18.794 --> 0:03:21.594
<v Speaker 5>theyre's still I'm sadly, a lot of men who do

0:03:21.674 --> 0:03:23.954
<v Speaker 5>not feel like they can be led by a woman,

0:03:23.994 --> 0:03:25.834
<v Speaker 5>and we saw it.

0:03:25.874 --> 0:03:27.394
<v Speaker 2>Is that true, Amelia Lester.

0:03:28.034 --> 0:03:29.634
<v Speaker 1>It is a bit of a split screen, isn't it?

0:03:29.634 --> 0:03:32.474
<v Speaker 1>Because I saw this everywhere this weekend, And then just

0:03:32.514 --> 0:03:37.194
<v Speaker 1>before we came into record, I saw that President Trump

0:03:37.474 --> 0:03:41.074
<v Speaker 1>was on Air Force one this morning and he called

0:03:41.114 --> 0:03:45.754
<v Speaker 1>a female reporter a piggy. He said, stop talking, piggy. So,

0:03:45.834 --> 0:03:47.554
<v Speaker 1>you know, on the one hand, I can see why

0:03:47.594 --> 0:03:50.994
<v Speaker 1>she says that Americans are not ready. On the other hand,

0:03:51.114 --> 0:03:56.714
<v Speaker 1>I feel a little bit more optimistic than Michelle on this.

0:03:56.914 --> 0:03:59.434
<v Speaker 1>I mean, what we had to remember is Americans gave

0:03:59.554 --> 0:04:03.434
<v Speaker 1>Hillary Clinton the popular vote, and seventy five million Americans

0:04:03.594 --> 0:04:06.634
<v Speaker 1>voted for Kamila Harris. There were a lot of things

0:04:06.754 --> 0:04:10.354
<v Speaker 1>going on in that election that were weird and unusual.

0:04:10.594 --> 0:04:12.994
<v Speaker 1>She had one hundred and six days to run. I

0:04:13.154 --> 0:04:15.514
<v Speaker 1>just wonder if things might have just gone a little

0:04:15.554 --> 0:04:17.954
<v Speaker 1>bit differently, we would be living in a completely different

0:04:17.954 --> 0:04:21.034
<v Speaker 1>timeline talking about how evolved Americans are for voting in

0:04:21.074 --> 0:04:24.113
<v Speaker 1>an American woman to be president. So I feel just

0:04:24.193 --> 0:04:26.993
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more optimistic than her and the people who.

0:04:26.834 --> 0:04:29.914
<v Speaker 4>Are saying to her, run run run, are.

0:04:30.393 --> 0:04:31.953
<v Speaker 3>Not the same people who wouldn't vote for her, Like,

0:04:31.993 --> 0:04:34.753
<v Speaker 3>I don't think they're lying. I think whether the US

0:04:34.834 --> 0:04:37.754
<v Speaker 3>is ready is a really valid question, and I totally

0:04:37.873 --> 0:04:41.034
<v Speaker 3>appreciate and respect her position of like, don't waste my time.

0:04:41.034 --> 0:04:44.874
<v Speaker 3>I'm not going to do this to be racially villified,

0:04:45.393 --> 0:04:47.874
<v Speaker 3>to be the subject of sexism, all of the things

0:04:47.914 --> 0:04:50.234
<v Speaker 3>we know it would happen, Like all power to her.

0:04:50.274 --> 0:04:54.193
<v Speaker 3>I completely understand her position. But as you say, seventy

0:04:54.193 --> 0:04:56.794
<v Speaker 3>five million people vote for Kamala Harris, that means a

0:04:56.794 --> 0:05:01.273
<v Speaker 3>lot of Americans are ready. As we record this episode,

0:05:01.513 --> 0:05:05.594
<v Speaker 3>the doors of Saint Andrew's Cathedral are opening, just literally

0:05:05.633 --> 0:05:09.394
<v Speaker 3>a few steps from we are sitting right now, hundreds

0:05:09.433 --> 0:05:13.474
<v Speaker 3>and hundreds of Australians will gather for the state funeral

0:05:13.633 --> 0:05:16.914
<v Speaker 3>of John Laws. He passed away at the age of

0:05:17.034 --> 0:05:21.634
<v Speaker 3>ninety ten days ago, and he was a broadcaster, a

0:05:22.034 --> 0:05:22.474
<v Speaker 3>sort of.

0:05:22.794 --> 0:05:23.873
<v Speaker 4>The first shock jock.

0:05:24.034 --> 0:05:27.674
<v Speaker 3>I suppose for more than seven decades he was known

0:05:27.674 --> 0:05:30.753
<v Speaker 3>as the Golden Tonsils was his nickname, and Chris Mins,

0:05:30.834 --> 0:05:33.473
<v Speaker 3>the New South Wales Premier, says he left a lasting

0:05:33.553 --> 0:05:38.553
<v Speaker 3>mark on Australian media. For those reasons, they've decided that

0:05:38.674 --> 0:05:43.714
<v Speaker 3>he should you receive this honor. But Holly, there's more

0:05:43.753 --> 0:05:48.433
<v Speaker 3>to Laws's story. What is sort of the controversial aspects

0:05:48.433 --> 0:05:49.393
<v Speaker 3>of what he's known for.

0:05:49.553 --> 0:05:52.674
<v Speaker 2>So obviously he's a very famous man, and every prime

0:05:52.714 --> 0:05:54.393
<v Speaker 2>minister that we've ever had has had to go and

0:05:54.433 --> 0:05:56.873
<v Speaker 2>bend the knee, and indeed they'll be doing it again today.

0:05:57.354 --> 0:06:00.553
<v Speaker 2>But the people who argue that Laws's reputation was not

0:06:00.674 --> 0:06:03.714
<v Speaker 2>really unsolid enough to have warranted this would point to

0:06:03.794 --> 0:06:06.833
<v Speaker 2>things like in nineteen ninety nine, he was part of

0:06:06.834 --> 0:06:09.553
<v Speaker 2>a ski that was broadly called the cash for Comment scandal,

0:06:09.553 --> 0:06:13.273
<v Speaker 2>where it was clear that he was promoting brands and

0:06:13.313 --> 0:06:16.153
<v Speaker 2>things without disclosing them. In some ways that seems almost

0:06:16.234 --> 0:06:18.354
<v Speaker 2>quaint in these days, but at the time that was

0:06:18.393 --> 0:06:21.354
<v Speaker 2>a really big deal on talkback radio, and he knew

0:06:21.393 --> 0:06:23.154
<v Speaker 2>that that was going to follow him when he did

0:06:23.193 --> 0:06:24.993
<v Speaker 2>this interview with Lee Sales a few years ago, which

0:06:25.073 --> 0:06:27.193
<v Speaker 2>was iconic. He sat there with his bourbon do you remember,

0:06:27.193 --> 0:06:29.513
<v Speaker 2>and his sunglasses on, and one of the things he

0:06:29.594 --> 0:06:33.234
<v Speaker 2>said was, remember the alleged cash for comment garbage that

0:06:33.313 --> 0:06:33.754
<v Speaker 2>went on.

0:06:34.073 --> 0:06:35.194
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to die with that.

0:06:35.474 --> 0:06:38.074
<v Speaker 2>Even though all I was accused of was being excessively

0:06:38.073 --> 0:06:42.674
<v Speaker 2>loyal to my sponsors that he also in two thousand

0:06:42.674 --> 0:06:45.873
<v Speaker 2>and four, he and his colleague Steve Price were found

0:06:45.873 --> 0:06:49.954
<v Speaker 2>guilty of homosexual vilification. Again cashed your mind back to

0:06:49.993 --> 0:06:52.873
<v Speaker 2>a time when the bloc started and there was a

0:06:52.953 --> 0:06:55.993
<v Speaker 2>male gay couple on it which was like ooh radical

0:06:56.073 --> 0:06:59.953
<v Speaker 2>on TV, and both Laws and Price, in talking about it,

0:07:00.034 --> 0:07:02.874
<v Speaker 2>used all kinds of slurs that you would never use

0:07:02.914 --> 0:07:04.833
<v Speaker 2>now and should never have used them, and they both

0:07:04.914 --> 0:07:08.873
<v Speaker 2>got really hefty fines for it. Other things he did,

0:07:08.993 --> 0:07:11.794
<v Speaker 2>he made some really dismissive comments about mental health and

0:07:11.834 --> 0:07:16.394
<v Speaker 2>some inappropriate talkback segments about sexual abuse. And he also

0:07:16.594 --> 0:07:20.473
<v Speaker 2>was very well known for having very conservative workplace policies

0:07:20.514 --> 0:07:23.554
<v Speaker 2>when it came to women. He called his producers handmaidens,

0:07:24.194 --> 0:07:26.794
<v Speaker 2>and he insisted on skirts or dresses at.

0:07:26.674 --> 0:07:27.833
<v Speaker 1>Work at all times.

0:07:27.953 --> 0:07:30.234
<v Speaker 2>So these are some of the things that obviously follow

0:07:30.393 --> 0:07:33.434
<v Speaker 2>the laws legacy that are not quite so illustrious.

0:07:33.834 --> 0:07:38.074
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, So that's why some have expressed there's been kind

0:07:38.074 --> 0:07:41.874
<v Speaker 3>of a loud chorus of discomfort about him being afforded

0:07:41.914 --> 0:07:44.514
<v Speaker 3>a state funeral, which, to be clear, that means that

0:07:44.554 --> 0:07:47.953
<v Speaker 3>it is funded by the state government, often in partnership

0:07:47.953 --> 0:07:50.754
<v Speaker 3>with the federal government. In shot we're paying for it,

0:07:50.834 --> 0:07:52.634
<v Speaker 3>taxpayer dollars paying for it.

0:07:53.154 --> 0:07:54.394
<v Speaker 1>And how much are we talking?

0:07:54.634 --> 0:07:58.033
<v Speaker 3>Okay, so it's not clear and it varies from person

0:07:58.074 --> 0:08:00.953
<v Speaker 3>to person. But the big one that I remember a

0:08:00.953 --> 0:08:04.033
<v Speaker 3>lot of discussion about was Shane warn He was afforded

0:08:04.074 --> 0:08:06.714
<v Speaker 3>a state funeral. It was about one point six million

0:08:06.714 --> 0:08:08.354
<v Speaker 3>dollars day. I think it cost tax pays.

0:08:08.994 --> 0:08:10.434
<v Speaker 4>Now, another point.

0:08:10.154 --> 0:08:13.594
<v Speaker 3>Of this that makes people annoyed is that John Laws

0:08:13.714 --> 0:08:16.593
<v Speaker 3>made a lot of money. He was one of the

0:08:16.594 --> 0:08:21.354
<v Speaker 3>most well paid radio broadcasters of his time. Estimates say,

0:08:21.434 --> 0:08:24.354
<v Speaker 3>you know, in the millions every year. So could his

0:08:24.393 --> 0:08:27.393
<v Speaker 3>family have afforded it? Absolutely? And so I guess the

0:08:27.514 --> 0:08:32.554
<v Speaker 3>question is given his wealth. Given also the controversy do

0:08:32.634 --> 0:08:35.794
<v Speaker 3>we think he should be afforded this state funeral or

0:08:35.794 --> 0:08:38.194
<v Speaker 3>should it be private something that the family pays for

0:08:38.674 --> 0:08:39.674
<v Speaker 3>like the rest of us.

0:08:39.714 --> 0:08:40.674
<v Speaker 4>What do you reckon, Amelia?

0:08:41.274 --> 0:08:43.314
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm in a bit of two minds about it,

0:08:43.354 --> 0:08:47.154
<v Speaker 1>because look, he obviously was really widely loved by millions

0:08:47.154 --> 0:08:49.754
<v Speaker 1>of Australians and that was one of the reasons given

0:08:49.794 --> 0:08:52.394
<v Speaker 1>by the state government for holding this funeral by a

0:08:52.434 --> 0:08:56.953
<v Speaker 1>particular demographic segment of Australians. But nonetheless, millions of Australians.

0:08:57.194 --> 0:08:59.754
<v Speaker 1>And also what I really appreciate about his legacy is

0:08:59.754 --> 0:09:02.474
<v Speaker 1>that no one ever knew what his actual politics were.

0:09:02.834 --> 0:09:06.354
<v Speaker 1>He kept them very much away from the microphone. He

0:09:06.434 --> 0:09:09.914
<v Speaker 1>supported some Labor prime ministers, he supported some Liberal prime ministers.

0:09:10.354 --> 0:09:12.514
<v Speaker 1>So I don't think that in any way he could

0:09:12.554 --> 0:09:16.554
<v Speaker 1>be accused of being a partisan figure. That said, for me,

0:09:16.714 --> 0:09:19.274
<v Speaker 1>the crux of this, and the reason I feel uncomfortable

0:09:19.274 --> 0:09:21.914
<v Speaker 1>with it is because of the money element, not because

0:09:21.954 --> 0:09:24.714
<v Speaker 1>his family could have afforded the state funeral. It's more

0:09:24.794 --> 0:09:28.914
<v Speaker 1>because why do we put on a state funeral? Arguably

0:09:28.994 --> 0:09:30.994
<v Speaker 1>it's to say thank you to someone who has served

0:09:30.994 --> 0:09:33.714
<v Speaker 1>our nation in some meaningful way. And you can certainly

0:09:33.714 --> 0:09:36.474
<v Speaker 1>make an argument that Laws has done that. But as

0:09:36.514 --> 0:09:40.194
<v Speaker 1>you point out Jesse, he was rewarded handsomely for that.

0:09:40.754 --> 0:09:43.834
<v Speaker 1>In he got millions of dollars in compensation every year

0:09:43.914 --> 0:09:46.994
<v Speaker 1>for what he did. He was very professionally successful. I

0:09:47.034 --> 0:09:51.074
<v Speaker 1>want to contrast that with someone like, for instance, Arthur Leggett,

0:09:51.074 --> 0:09:53.394
<v Speaker 1>who I wasn't aware of, but a state funeral was

0:09:53.394 --> 0:09:56.394
<v Speaker 1>held for him in Western Australia earlier this year. He

0:09:56.674 --> 0:09:59.514
<v Speaker 1>was Australia's last World War Two prisoner.

0:09:59.554 --> 0:09:59.914
<v Speaker 4>Of war.

0:10:00.434 --> 0:10:03.354
<v Speaker 1>He was held by the Japanese for four years. He

0:10:03.394 --> 0:10:06.594
<v Speaker 1>was captured when he was twenty two, and that seems

0:10:06.634 --> 0:10:09.194
<v Speaker 1>to me to be a service to the nation that

0:10:09.234 --> 0:10:13.314
<v Speaker 1>he was not particularly financially enriched for after that. Or

0:10:13.314 --> 0:10:17.514
<v Speaker 1>another example is Charles Perkins Charlie Perkins, again serving his nation,

0:10:17.714 --> 0:10:21.754
<v Speaker 1>but not really receiving financial rewards for that. So in

0:10:21.794 --> 0:10:23.514
<v Speaker 1>the case of both those men, it's really a way

0:10:23.514 --> 0:10:26.034
<v Speaker 1>of saying thank you in a way that they didn't

0:10:26.074 --> 0:10:26.794
<v Speaker 1>get money for.

0:10:27.634 --> 0:10:29.914
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I like what you say about service, And I

0:10:29.954 --> 0:10:33.674
<v Speaker 3>guess that the confusion or the complication here is that

0:10:34.234 --> 0:10:38.154
<v Speaker 3>the other state funeral that has been afforded and will

0:10:38.194 --> 0:10:41.114
<v Speaker 3>be happening in the coming days or weeks is Graham Richardson,

0:10:41.154 --> 0:10:46.914
<v Speaker 3>who is a former Labor senator and instrumental in labor politics.

0:10:46.994 --> 0:10:51.394
<v Speaker 3>But Kate McClymont, the Sinney Morning Herald's journalist, has come

0:10:51.434 --> 0:10:53.833
<v Speaker 3>out and said this is a story I could never

0:10:53.874 --> 0:10:58.034
<v Speaker 3>write like she had so much to say about Richardson.

0:10:58.954 --> 0:11:00.754
<v Speaker 1>The article was jaw dropping.

0:11:00.914 --> 0:11:06.554
<v Speaker 3>It was it was incredible, from corruption to stories of how.

0:11:06.754 --> 0:11:09.794
<v Speaker 1>Swiss bank accounts demanding sex worker services as a form

0:11:09.834 --> 0:11:12.314
<v Speaker 1>of payment from dodgy business to yours exactly.

0:11:12.474 --> 0:11:15.274
<v Speaker 3>Like a lot of people have said, whatever is good deeds,

0:11:15.314 --> 0:11:18.833
<v Speaker 3>he's bad deeds outweighed them, Holly. I mean, you could

0:11:18.834 --> 0:11:23.474
<v Speaker 3>say richardson life of service labor politician, like, is this

0:11:23.514 --> 0:11:25.154
<v Speaker 3>what we do now? If you get a state funeral,

0:11:25.154 --> 0:11:27.674
<v Speaker 3>does that mean that everyone gets to prosecute everything you

0:11:27.714 --> 0:11:29.714
<v Speaker 3>ever did and whether you're a good enough person to

0:11:30.674 --> 0:11:33.074
<v Speaker 3>be allowed to have our tax paid dollars.

0:11:33.154 --> 0:11:36.554
<v Speaker 2>I just think that's an inevitability of having even a

0:11:36.634 --> 0:11:39.994
<v Speaker 2>thing that is a state funeral, Like, it's kind of

0:11:40.074 --> 0:11:44.994
<v Speaker 2>a strange tradition. I agree with Amelia that I guess

0:11:45.114 --> 0:11:48.874
<v Speaker 2>my particular leanings would be to people who of great

0:11:49.074 --> 0:11:51.594
<v Speaker 2>acts of great service to the nation, who couldn't afford

0:11:51.594 --> 0:11:53.834
<v Speaker 2>a decent sendoff, and who need to be rewarded and

0:11:53.874 --> 0:11:56.714
<v Speaker 2>remembered in a fitting way. I think, great chip in

0:11:56.754 --> 0:11:57.394
<v Speaker 2>for their funeral.

0:11:57.674 --> 0:11:59.154
<v Speaker 4>But do you think about former pms.

0:11:59.234 --> 0:12:02.394
<v Speaker 2>I think, well, even that, I mean, that's an active

0:12:02.434 --> 0:12:04.634
<v Speaker 2>service to the nation. But again, you get paid for it,

0:12:04.754 --> 0:12:07.674
<v Speaker 2>you know, I don't. I think it's a strange. What

0:12:07.994 --> 0:12:11.754
<v Speaker 2>fascinates me the most about state funerals is that you

0:12:11.794 --> 0:12:14.314
<v Speaker 2>get offered them, right, so you get offered them by

0:12:14.354 --> 0:12:17.434
<v Speaker 2>the government, state government, federal government, and the family are

0:12:17.434 --> 0:12:20.434
<v Speaker 2>the ones who decide. And so that tells you I

0:12:20.474 --> 0:12:22.954
<v Speaker 2>think that the people who get them, they really wanted one,

0:12:23.074 --> 0:12:25.434
<v Speaker 2>you know what I mean. Like Lawsy, he would have

0:12:25.474 --> 0:12:28.314
<v Speaker 2>really wanted a state funeral. He wants everybody lined up

0:12:28.354 --> 0:12:32.274
<v Speaker 2>there today, all the former pms, all his like rivals

0:12:32.274 --> 0:12:34.194
<v Speaker 2>in radio or forced to wear a suit and be

0:12:34.274 --> 0:12:38.634
<v Speaker 2>there for the TV cameras. Whereas famously Steve Irwin, very

0:12:38.634 --> 0:12:41.394
<v Speaker 2>famous Australian of a very different kind, was offered one

0:12:41.394 --> 0:12:43.314
<v Speaker 2>and his family were like, nah, he wouldn't like that.

0:12:43.834 --> 0:12:46.794
<v Speaker 2>And Betty Cuffbert, she was an Olympic legend, female Olympic

0:12:46.914 --> 0:12:49.274
<v Speaker 2>legend from you know, the olden days as it were.

0:12:49.394 --> 0:12:51.554
<v Speaker 2>She died this year and she was offered one too,

0:12:51.594 --> 0:12:53.674
<v Speaker 2>and her family were like, nah, she would have hated that.

0:12:53.994 --> 0:12:57.674
<v Speaker 2>We want a quiet, private service that just remembers her

0:12:57.714 --> 0:12:59.874
<v Speaker 2>as she would have liked to be remembered. So I'm

0:12:59.954 --> 0:13:02.394
<v Speaker 2>kind of fascinated by the idea of if you were

0:13:02.474 --> 0:13:03.874
<v Speaker 2>offered one, if you'd take it.

0:13:05.074 --> 0:13:07.794
<v Speaker 3>There is some like pomp and ceremony, it will be

0:13:07.874 --> 0:13:10.714
<v Speaker 3>a real spectacle, the John Laws thing, and some people

0:13:10.794 --> 0:13:14.954
<v Speaker 3>do deserve that. Fred Hollows had a state funeral and

0:13:14.994 --> 0:13:18.114
<v Speaker 3>his contribution to Australia, you know, he was someone who

0:13:18.234 --> 0:13:21.394
<v Speaker 3>restored the eyesight of so many Australians and people overseas,

0:13:21.794 --> 0:13:24.514
<v Speaker 3>enormous legacy, Like yes, about down.

0:13:24.634 --> 0:13:26.554
<v Speaker 2>It's going to be televised too. So I was on

0:13:26.914 --> 0:13:29.874
<v Speaker 2>I was watching seven this morning and they were very

0:13:29.874 --> 0:13:33.194
<v Speaker 2>heavily promoting it. And it's interesting because it wasn't a

0:13:33.234 --> 0:13:35.354
<v Speaker 2>state funeral, I don't think, but one of the most

0:13:35.394 --> 0:13:38.914
<v Speaker 2>memorable televised Australian funerals I can remember, and it happened

0:13:38.914 --> 0:13:43.034
<v Speaker 2>in the same place was Michael Hutchins's funeral and that

0:13:43.194 --> 0:13:46.554
<v Speaker 2>was across the road here, and the optics of all

0:13:46.634 --> 0:13:51.554
<v Speaker 2>these glamorous women like Kylie Minogue, Helena Christian Coates and

0:13:51.994 --> 0:13:55.074
<v Speaker 2>in their like little veils and it was like Nick

0:13:55.114 --> 0:13:58.074
<v Speaker 2>Cave was playing into your arms. It was like a

0:13:58.274 --> 0:14:01.634
<v Speaker 2>royal event and it seemed very fitting. I don't know

0:14:01.674 --> 0:14:03.474
<v Speaker 2>who paid for that, but it seemed very fitting. And

0:14:03.514 --> 0:14:05.554
<v Speaker 2>I watched it on television and was very moved. And

0:14:05.594 --> 0:14:08.394
<v Speaker 2>it's kind of I don't know, it's really interesting in

0:14:08.434 --> 0:14:10.874
<v Speaker 2>that status in death and who turns up and all that.

0:14:10.954 --> 0:14:12.394
<v Speaker 2>We're very interested in it.

0:14:12.434 --> 0:14:14.554
<v Speaker 1>I feel like I want to ask you, Jesse, because

0:14:14.634 --> 0:14:17.914
<v Speaker 1>you know Fred Hollows. We can all agree former prisoner

0:14:17.954 --> 0:14:21.154
<v Speaker 1>of war. Yes, but you raise a really interesting edge case,

0:14:21.154 --> 0:14:24.154
<v Speaker 1>which is prime ministers because on the one hand service,

0:14:24.274 --> 0:14:27.594
<v Speaker 1>on the other hand, enrichment for that service in many ways,

0:14:27.754 --> 0:14:31.234
<v Speaker 1>either because they receive a generous salary while they're in office,

0:14:31.234 --> 0:14:32.994
<v Speaker 1>but also after they've been in office, there are all

0:14:33.034 --> 0:14:35.834
<v Speaker 1>sorts of business opportunities for former prime ministers. So what

0:14:35.834 --> 0:14:37.514
<v Speaker 1>do you think do you think prime ministers should get

0:14:37.554 --> 0:14:38.154
<v Speaker 1>a state funeral?

0:14:38.474 --> 0:14:42.714
<v Speaker 3>I understand why they do, and because their legacy is

0:14:42.794 --> 0:14:47.154
<v Speaker 3>so tied up with the lives of Australians and what

0:14:47.314 --> 0:14:49.034
<v Speaker 3>they did, and I guess that they do say it

0:14:49.114 --> 0:14:51.634
<v Speaker 3>as a role of service. I mean, there are a

0:14:51.674 --> 0:14:54.074
<v Speaker 3>lot of people who have roles of service that don't

0:14:54.194 --> 0:14:56.274
<v Speaker 3>receive that monetary reward.

0:14:56.794 --> 0:14:57.434
<v Speaker 4>But I guess it.

0:14:57.394 --> 0:14:59.754
<v Speaker 3>Comes down to who chooses who has a state funeral,

0:14:59.914 --> 0:15:03.394
<v Speaker 3>and if it's politicians, if it's often the Prime Minister

0:15:03.714 --> 0:15:04.354
<v Speaker 3>or the Premier.

0:15:05.314 --> 0:15:07.514
<v Speaker 4>They know these people personally.

0:15:07.314 --> 0:15:10.674
<v Speaker 3>Right, and like they see this as and even I'm

0:15:10.674 --> 0:15:13.554
<v Speaker 3>thinking of like Queen Elizabeth right, So many people wanted

0:15:13.594 --> 0:15:18.154
<v Speaker 3>to go and show their support to the family and

0:15:18.834 --> 0:15:22.834
<v Speaker 3>have this kind of collective moment of mourning for that loss,

0:15:23.714 --> 0:15:26.794
<v Speaker 3>which I kind of appreciate as well. But I remember

0:15:26.914 --> 0:15:31.194
<v Speaker 3>feeling really uncomfortable around the time of George Pell's death

0:15:31.314 --> 0:15:34.954
<v Speaker 3>because state funeral a few years before totally would have

0:15:34.994 --> 0:15:38.874
<v Speaker 3>been on the cards. But it was Daniel Andrews, I think,

0:15:39.194 --> 0:15:42.114
<v Speaker 3>who came out the Victorian premier and said that would

0:15:42.154 --> 0:15:44.314
<v Speaker 3>be so distressing to his victims. And it was a

0:15:44.354 --> 0:15:47.234
<v Speaker 3>private ceremony. There were still people who showed up and protested.

0:15:48.074 --> 0:15:50.514
<v Speaker 3>But whether or not you accept it is interesting because

0:15:50.794 --> 0:15:53.154
<v Speaker 3>there's not a person. You go through John Laws's life,

0:15:53.194 --> 0:15:55.314
<v Speaker 3>you even go through Fred Hollows's life, right, and there

0:15:55.354 --> 0:15:58.634
<v Speaker 3>are moments where you go probably didn't age too well

0:15:58.874 --> 0:16:02.634
<v Speaker 3>those comments that they made twenty thirty years ago. And

0:16:02.674 --> 0:16:09.314
<v Speaker 3>when it does become everyone's business, then everyone discussing whether

0:16:09.354 --> 0:16:12.554
<v Speaker 3>that person was a morally pure person is something I

0:16:12.554 --> 0:16:14.594
<v Speaker 3>don't think anyone wants to do in the days after

0:16:14.634 --> 0:16:17.994
<v Speaker 3>someone dies, like I'd feel for John Laws's family, I

0:16:18.034 --> 0:16:21.474
<v Speaker 3>feel for Graham Richardson's family. Death is a is something

0:16:21.514 --> 0:16:24.274
<v Speaker 3>that affects those closest to them, and I kind of

0:16:24.314 --> 0:16:25.434
<v Speaker 3>hate the way that we all go.

0:16:26.314 --> 0:16:28.354
<v Speaker 2>But if you're going to accept it. It's the opposite

0:16:28.394 --> 0:16:31.634
<v Speaker 2>of private morning, It's the opposite. Yeah. So I'm sure

0:16:31.634 --> 0:16:34.434
<v Speaker 2>that very many people who have big public memorials like

0:16:34.474 --> 0:16:38.714
<v Speaker 2>this probably also have a private family one. And I

0:16:38.794 --> 0:16:40.434
<v Speaker 2>kind of think that if you're going to accept a

0:16:40.554 --> 0:16:43.914
<v Speaker 2>state funeral and taxpayers dollars and have it on the television,

0:16:44.274 --> 0:16:47.394
<v Speaker 2>then you've got to expect a little bit of analysis.

0:16:47.874 --> 0:16:50.314
<v Speaker 1>I was actually a bit surprised. I have to admit

0:16:50.394 --> 0:16:54.354
<v Speaker 1>that Albow, who's normally so good at reading the national mood,

0:16:54.754 --> 0:16:57.034
<v Speaker 1>did immediately jump in and say there was going to

0:16:57.034 --> 0:17:00.754
<v Speaker 1>be a state funeral for Richardson, because, look, John Laws,

0:17:01.034 --> 0:17:03.914
<v Speaker 1>no arguing with the fact that that guy was beloved

0:17:04.154 --> 0:17:08.154
<v Speaker 1>by so many people, and I'm sure all grahe Richardson's

0:17:08.154 --> 0:17:10.793
<v Speaker 1>passing is mourned by a lot of people within the

0:17:10.874 --> 0:17:13.714
<v Speaker 1>labor parties, certainly by his family, by people who loved

0:17:13.794 --> 0:17:16.513
<v Speaker 1>him and cared for him. But is he beloved in

0:17:16.554 --> 0:17:19.273
<v Speaker 1>the same way as John Laws. I think that's a

0:17:19.354 --> 0:17:21.033
<v Speaker 1>much more debatable question, and in.

0:17:20.914 --> 0:17:24.234
<v Speaker 3>Fact, in terms of labor politics, you'd argue it's a

0:17:24.234 --> 0:17:27.594
<v Speaker 3>bad look. Like you almost it's on the nose to

0:17:27.754 --> 0:17:31.554
<v Speaker 3>even associate yourself with someone who the history of corruption

0:17:31.634 --> 0:17:33.834
<v Speaker 3>and all that kind of stuff. You just go, this

0:17:33.994 --> 0:17:35.834
<v Speaker 3>isn't what labor politics represents.

0:17:35.994 --> 0:17:37.554
<v Speaker 4>And so then that gets really uncomfortable.

0:17:37.594 --> 0:17:39.474
<v Speaker 1>And I know I'm arguing against myself a little bit,

0:17:39.514 --> 0:17:42.074
<v Speaker 1>because Richardson did a lot of things that were really

0:17:42.114 --> 0:17:45.114
<v Speaker 1>ahead of their time and which helped Australia move forward

0:17:45.194 --> 0:17:48.994
<v Speaker 1>as a nation. For instance, his work on environmental regulations

0:17:49.034 --> 0:17:51.594
<v Speaker 1>in the eighties was really groundbreaking and helped us to

0:17:51.594 --> 0:17:54.154
<v Speaker 1>protect our natural environment at a time when people weren't

0:17:54.154 --> 0:17:57.434
<v Speaker 1>even really thinking about that. But I do feel uncomfortable

0:17:57.474 --> 0:18:03.434
<v Speaker 1>about someone who's so clearly sought personal financial enrichment from

0:18:03.474 --> 0:18:06.273
<v Speaker 1>the service that he gave to this country getting his

0:18:06.354 --> 0:18:08.354
<v Speaker 1>funeral paid for or by the state. I do feel

0:18:08.434 --> 0:18:11.154
<v Speaker 1>uncomfortable about it, and I'm surprised that Albanezi went out

0:18:11.154 --> 0:18:14.914
<v Speaker 1>on that limb that way. In a moment, I want

0:18:14.914 --> 0:18:26.434
<v Speaker 1>to know why millennials aren't having affairs speak for yourself, Familia. Look,

0:18:26.514 --> 0:18:29.833
<v Speaker 1>I regret to inform you that millennials have killed the affair.

0:18:29.954 --> 0:18:33.114
<v Speaker 1>And Holly, I know that as a cool genexa you're

0:18:33.314 --> 0:18:38.434
<v Speaker 1>rolling your eyes our puritanical, boring way. But let me

0:18:38.474 --> 0:18:41.674
<v Speaker 1>get into why I should be French. I should be French.

0:18:42.154 --> 0:18:44.754
<v Speaker 1>Where is your cigarette right now? That was a joke.

0:18:45.394 --> 0:18:48.834
<v Speaker 1>According to an article in the Atlantic by Olga Kazan,

0:18:49.434 --> 0:18:52.354
<v Speaker 1>Americans over fifty five are much more likely to have

0:18:52.394 --> 0:18:55.114
<v Speaker 1>an affair than Americans under fifty five. And before you

0:18:55.154 --> 0:18:57.833
<v Speaker 1>come at me with why you citing American statistics, it's

0:18:57.874 --> 0:19:00.954
<v Speaker 1>because Australians are not replying to a stranger who calls

0:19:00.994 --> 0:19:03.234
<v Speaker 1>them on the phone asking them if they are having

0:19:03.274 --> 0:19:03.714
<v Speaker 1>an affair.

0:19:04.034 --> 0:19:06.994
<v Speaker 3>Americans are offering that.

0:19:07.154 --> 0:19:11.434
<v Speaker 1>I think I could not find a similar survey of Australia. Sorry,

0:19:11.554 --> 0:19:14.074
<v Speaker 1>are you my wife? Now? It might be that people

0:19:14.114 --> 0:19:17.434
<v Speaker 1>over fifty five have simply been married for longer, yes,

0:19:17.474 --> 0:19:21.354
<v Speaker 1>and getting a bit bored in the relationship. But there

0:19:21.474 --> 0:19:24.074
<v Speaker 1>is some other evidence that millennials are kind of remaking

0:19:24.114 --> 0:19:26.234
<v Speaker 1>marriage into their own image. And here are some of

0:19:26.274 --> 0:19:29.474
<v Speaker 1>them and Jodally Millennials report to Kauz, aren't that they

0:19:29.594 --> 0:19:32.594
<v Speaker 1>don't know people having affairs? And that's true in my life,

0:19:32.674 --> 0:19:36.314
<v Speaker 1>I don't know people having affairs at all. No comment

0:19:36.474 --> 0:19:41.234
<v Speaker 1>now again, because I am young in holy okay, I'm

0:19:41.234 --> 0:19:46.994
<v Speaker 1>just going to throw to you.

0:19:45.154 --> 0:19:47.033
<v Speaker 2>That isn't what I think. It's just I was just

0:19:47.074 --> 0:19:49.474
<v Speaker 2>no comment on the whole Do I know anyone is

0:19:49.474 --> 0:19:50.553
<v Speaker 2>having an affair like?

0:19:50.634 --> 0:19:53.553
<v Speaker 1>I can't answer that, But do you think that this

0:19:53.714 --> 0:19:55.874
<v Speaker 1>is just because millennials haven't been married for long enough,

0:19:55.954 --> 0:19:57.234
<v Speaker 1>or is there something new here?

0:19:57.554 --> 0:19:59.994
<v Speaker 2>I think it's really interesting because in lots of ways,

0:19:59.994 --> 0:20:02.593
<v Speaker 2>it's never been easier to cheat, right, like dating apps,

0:20:02.714 --> 0:20:06.434
<v Speaker 2>technology has made it incredibly easy to cheat, it's also

0:20:06.474 --> 0:20:09.274
<v Speaker 2>made it easy to get caught. So though that's kind

0:20:09.314 --> 0:20:12.074
<v Speaker 2>of two sides of the same coin, but one of

0:20:12.074 --> 0:20:14.274
<v Speaker 2>the reasons I think everybody's obsessed with this new Lili

0:20:14.354 --> 0:20:16.954
<v Speaker 2>Allen album. I know I am, but people are saying

0:20:16.994 --> 0:20:19.754
<v Speaker 2>it paints a very modern picture of marriage. She's just

0:20:19.794 --> 0:20:22.594
<v Speaker 2>about to be forty in you know, there's a certain

0:20:22.634 --> 0:20:24.674
<v Speaker 2>element of we're trying to be cool and we're trying

0:20:24.674 --> 0:20:27.194
<v Speaker 2>to be open, and everybody understands that there's now infinite

0:20:27.274 --> 0:20:29.634
<v Speaker 2>choice in our phones. But it's really hard when you're

0:20:29.634 --> 0:20:32.314
<v Speaker 2>in love and trying to live a dream to also

0:20:32.354 --> 0:20:34.914
<v Speaker 2>pretend that you're so fine with all that. So I

0:20:34.954 --> 0:20:37.954
<v Speaker 2>think in some ways it's surprising if this is true,

0:20:37.994 --> 0:20:42.154
<v Speaker 2>because the opportunity seems to be so much bigger. But

0:20:42.234 --> 0:20:46.114
<v Speaker 2>then in another way, it's not surprising because millennials have

0:20:46.154 --> 0:20:49.034
<v Speaker 2>been getting married later, so they've been living together first.

0:20:49.434 --> 0:20:52.034
<v Speaker 2>I think women have a lot more power and choice

0:20:52.074 --> 0:20:54.394
<v Speaker 2>in terms of who they decide to settle down with,

0:20:54.474 --> 0:20:56.833
<v Speaker 2>and so maybe some of the red flags of cheating.

0:20:56.834 --> 0:20:59.714
<v Speaker 2>And I'm not suggesting for a second that only men cheat,

0:20:59.754 --> 0:21:02.954
<v Speaker 2>That is certainly not true both sides, but particularly women

0:21:02.954 --> 0:21:05.594
<v Speaker 2>have never probably had as much choice about who they're

0:21:05.594 --> 0:21:08.874
<v Speaker 2>going to partner with, and so you could argue that

0:21:08.914 --> 0:21:12.274
<v Speaker 2>there's a place here for well, these marriages maybe will

0:21:12.354 --> 0:21:16.954
<v Speaker 2>better thought out than previous marriages perhaps, And I do think,

0:21:17.834 --> 0:21:20.954
<v Speaker 2>having just said that about dating apps and things, anecdotally,

0:21:21.234 --> 0:21:24.274
<v Speaker 2>I feel like millennials are quite puritanical. They're not quite

0:21:24.274 --> 0:21:28.514
<v Speaker 2>as puritanical as jen Zi's, but very into traditions, very

0:21:28.514 --> 0:21:31.793
<v Speaker 2>inter rings and marriages. And maybe that is a reaction to,

0:21:32.074 --> 0:21:34.954
<v Speaker 2>you know, being a generation many of whom are children

0:21:34.994 --> 0:21:38.474
<v Speaker 2>of divorce and marriages that didn't last and maybe saw

0:21:38.514 --> 0:21:40.754
<v Speaker 2>the effects of infidelity. So I think there's like a

0:21:40.754 --> 0:21:45.114
<v Speaker 2>big soupy pot here that probably in a positive way,

0:21:45.754 --> 0:21:48.754
<v Speaker 2>ends up with taking marriage more seriously, thinking about it

0:21:48.794 --> 0:21:51.714
<v Speaker 2>more before you're doing it, understanding the consequences, more of

0:21:51.754 --> 0:21:54.114
<v Speaker 2>messing around, or you're just boring.

0:21:54.314 --> 0:21:57.474
<v Speaker 1>It's true that millennials much more likely to have grown

0:21:57.554 --> 0:21:59.634
<v Speaker 1>up as children of divorce than their children will be

0:21:59.674 --> 0:22:02.314
<v Speaker 1>if these trans continue. The divorce rate peaked in nineteen

0:22:02.314 --> 0:22:05.714
<v Speaker 1>seventy nine, so millennials really were that first generation to

0:22:05.834 --> 0:22:09.513
<v Speaker 1>experience having divorced parents on mass. So, Jesse, are we

0:22:09.634 --> 0:22:12.714
<v Speaker 1>more puritanical or are we in fact just better than

0:22:12.794 --> 0:22:15.674
<v Speaker 1>Gen X because we, yeah, we actually take things like

0:22:15.754 --> 0:22:16.914
<v Speaker 1>commitments seriously.

0:22:17.234 --> 0:22:20.074
<v Speaker 3>I know, I do wonder that, and then I wonder,

0:22:20.154 --> 0:22:25.394
<v Speaker 3>this isn't a totally unfounded theory based on anecdotal evidence,

0:22:25.914 --> 0:22:31.274
<v Speaker 3>which is that I wonder if some millennials their fear

0:22:31.354 --> 0:22:33.513
<v Speaker 3>is the affair, right, they might have seen it in

0:22:33.514 --> 0:22:38.793
<v Speaker 3>their family or their friends' parents, the lies, the way

0:22:38.874 --> 0:22:40.274
<v Speaker 3>it was corrosive.

0:22:39.834 --> 0:22:42.034
<v Speaker 4>To the family unit, that kind of thing, right.

0:22:42.474 --> 0:22:47.994
<v Speaker 3>My theory is that millennials don't necessarily sort of as

0:22:48.034 --> 0:22:51.754
<v Speaker 3>a generation, don't necessarily expect that they will have sex

0:22:51.754 --> 0:22:54.674
<v Speaker 3>with one person until the day they die. And I

0:22:54.834 --> 0:22:56.594
<v Speaker 3>have seen, in fact, a lot of the millennials I

0:22:56.674 --> 0:22:58.874
<v Speaker 3>know who have chosen not to get married are just

0:22:58.954 --> 0:23:01.634
<v Speaker 3>sort of like, we're together, we love each other.

0:23:01.714 --> 0:23:02.793
<v Speaker 4>It's great.

0:23:03.314 --> 0:23:06.714
<v Speaker 3>If there was boredom in our sex lives, or if

0:23:06.754 --> 0:23:10.634
<v Speaker 3>they're pretty open to going, whether it's an open relationship,

0:23:10.674 --> 0:23:14.554
<v Speaker 3>whether it's non monogamy, whether it's a break whatever they

0:23:14.594 --> 0:23:18.154
<v Speaker 3>call it. I wonder if the extra marital affair, that

0:23:18.394 --> 0:23:22.313
<v Speaker 3>terminology of something that's like a full on relationship outside

0:23:22.314 --> 0:23:26.474
<v Speaker 3>your marriage, is being reinvented as something that can Maybe

0:23:27.154 --> 0:23:30.033
<v Speaker 3>sex isn't the be all and end all, and you

0:23:30.034 --> 0:23:32.553
<v Speaker 3>can explore it outside your relationship, Like I wonder if

0:23:32.594 --> 0:23:33.194
<v Speaker 3>that's part of it.

0:23:33.274 --> 0:23:36.033
<v Speaker 2>I don't think that's part of it. I think like

0:23:36.114 --> 0:23:37.793
<v Speaker 2>I would like to think that was part of it,

0:23:37.874 --> 0:23:41.274
<v Speaker 2>because I genuinely think that the longer you're in a relationship,

0:23:41.794 --> 0:23:45.474
<v Speaker 2>and the more foundations you have around that relationship, whether

0:23:45.474 --> 0:23:49.154
<v Speaker 2>they're children, whether that is shared history, whether it's blended families,

0:23:49.194 --> 0:23:54.434
<v Speaker 2>whether it's financial merging, you realize that the sexual fidelity

0:23:54.474 --> 0:23:57.434
<v Speaker 2>part of it is not really it, Like it's small. Yeah,

0:23:57.714 --> 0:24:01.114
<v Speaker 2>And so I'd like to think that millennials are understanding that,

0:24:01.194 --> 0:24:03.554
<v Speaker 2>But that feels more like a gen Z thing the whole,

0:24:03.674 --> 0:24:05.994
<v Speaker 2>like thropple open pot.

0:24:06.114 --> 0:24:10.073
<v Speaker 3>I know I have seen images like like even you know,

0:24:10.274 --> 0:24:12.794
<v Speaker 3>pictures from a wedding on Instagram and I've gone that

0:24:12.954 --> 0:24:16.634
<v Speaker 3>so interesting that I know and everyone, all the friends

0:24:16.674 --> 0:24:19.954
<v Speaker 3>of the people at that wedding know that they sleep

0:24:19.954 --> 0:24:22.554
<v Speaker 3>with other people and that they're both comfortable with that, and.

0:24:22.514 --> 0:24:25.354
<v Speaker 2>It's just interesting. Still a massive outlier, Like whenever we

0:24:25.394 --> 0:24:28.273
<v Speaker 2>were on the stories Mama Mia about open marriages and

0:24:28.354 --> 0:24:33.034
<v Speaker 2>open relationships, there's still an enormous sort of curiosity because

0:24:33.074 --> 0:24:34.754
<v Speaker 2>it's still seen as quite odd.

0:24:34.954 --> 0:24:37.114
<v Speaker 4>I think it's talk about odd.

0:24:37.274 --> 0:24:40.314
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm saying that it's seen as quite odd, and even.

0:24:40.114 --> 0:24:41.234
<v Speaker 4>In this is Why We Fight.

0:24:41.714 --> 0:24:43.793
<v Speaker 3>I've been listening to that Mum Mayer podcast and it's

0:24:43.834 --> 0:24:46.914
<v Speaker 3>come up a few times of I would say millennial

0:24:47.074 --> 0:24:50.074
<v Speaker 3>sort of elder millennials talking about going through a rough

0:24:50.114 --> 0:24:52.994
<v Speaker 3>patch of their marriage and opening it up and going,

0:24:53.034 --> 0:24:54.594
<v Speaker 3>all right, you sleep with this person, I'll sleep with

0:24:54.594 --> 0:24:57.634
<v Speaker 3>this person, especially with like little kids or whatever.

0:24:57.874 --> 0:25:00.234
<v Speaker 2>I wonder a question that that is less hurtful.

0:25:00.634 --> 0:25:04.074
<v Speaker 1>Yes, yes, I am hearing about that. I anctotally Jesse,

0:25:04.314 --> 0:25:06.754
<v Speaker 1>particularly in a US context. So it's interesting that you're

0:25:06.754 --> 0:25:09.434
<v Speaker 1>also about it here. But I think you're onto something

0:25:09.474 --> 0:25:12.553
<v Speaker 1>with this idea that for millennial's marriage means something a

0:25:12.554 --> 0:25:15.834
<v Speaker 1>little bit different to what it used to mean. And Holly,

0:25:15.914 --> 0:25:18.954
<v Speaker 1>I want you to reserve judgment on this. I have

0:25:19.074 --> 0:25:21.434
<v Speaker 1>a theory that I want to bring to you, which

0:25:21.474 --> 0:25:25.194
<v Speaker 1>is that there's this new idea of the aloof wife,

0:25:25.794 --> 0:25:29.114
<v Speaker 1>and that means that women are not thinking of marriage

0:25:29.114 --> 0:25:31.594
<v Speaker 1>as their whole identity anymore. As I know you do, Holly.

0:25:31.674 --> 0:25:34.394
<v Speaker 1>I know that's very important to you. Oh wait. The

0:25:34.434 --> 0:25:37.513
<v Speaker 1>New New York mayor Zoran Mandani's wife is a twenty

0:25:37.514 --> 0:25:41.273
<v Speaker 1>eight year old animator. Her name is Ramaduagi. She was

0:25:41.274 --> 0:25:43.354
<v Speaker 1>called aloof by The New York Post in the lead

0:25:43.434 --> 0:25:46.954
<v Speaker 1>up to his successful mayoral campaign because she basically didn't

0:25:46.954 --> 0:25:48.954
<v Speaker 1>post about him on social media. Two days before he

0:25:48.994 --> 0:25:52.194
<v Speaker 1>was elected, she posted on Instagram, I want to get

0:25:52.194 --> 0:25:54.914
<v Speaker 1>this exactly right. Things I saw in October that made

0:25:54.994 --> 0:25:57.314
<v Speaker 1>me want to make art, which I just love that

0:25:58.274 --> 0:26:01.154
<v Speaker 1>like nothing about her husband making global headline.

0:26:01.194 --> 0:26:03.074
<v Speaker 2>She's not just standing next to him in a sheef

0:26:03.194 --> 0:26:04.793
<v Speaker 2>dress like smiling and waving.

0:26:04.874 --> 0:26:08.833
<v Speaker 1>No sheef dresses, no kissing baby, no cheesy photo ops.

0:26:09.074 --> 0:26:12.594
<v Speaker 1>He's doing his thing professionally. She's doing her thing professionally.

0:26:12.874 --> 0:26:15.954
<v Speaker 1>There was some reporting that she'd been really instrumental in

0:26:16.034 --> 0:26:18.434
<v Speaker 1>creating the look and feel of his social campaign, which

0:26:18.474 --> 0:26:20.994
<v Speaker 1>was a huge part of why people thought he was successful.

0:26:21.314 --> 0:26:24.914
<v Speaker 1>So clearly she had some input professionally speaking, but her

0:26:24.954 --> 0:26:28.034
<v Speaker 1>identity was not tied up in the idea of the marriage.

0:26:28.034 --> 0:26:30.194
<v Speaker 1>And this seems to speak to your idea that millennials

0:26:30.234 --> 0:26:33.514
<v Speaker 1>are finding a new way of approaching marriage that works

0:26:33.514 --> 0:26:35.794
<v Speaker 1>for them, whether that means an open marriage or being

0:26:35.834 --> 0:26:36.674
<v Speaker 1>an aloof wife.

0:26:36.794 --> 0:26:40.354
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, even the like first lady model of politics, I

0:26:40.394 --> 0:26:42.434
<v Speaker 3>feel like the millennials are going to have none of that.

0:26:42.714 --> 0:26:45.514
<v Speaker 3>It's like, I'm not here for your photo op. I'm here,

0:26:45.634 --> 0:26:48.194
<v Speaker 3>Hasslin on my own accord.

0:26:48.514 --> 0:26:48.954
<v Speaker 1>I hope.

0:26:49.034 --> 0:26:52.234
<v Speaker 2>So you have a very different view of millennials of me,

0:26:52.274 --> 0:26:55.994
<v Speaker 2>and that I after gen X's sort of messy cynicism,

0:26:56.234 --> 0:26:59.994
<v Speaker 2>I see millennials as being pretty uptight generally speaking, and

0:27:00.194 --> 0:27:04.553
<v Speaker 2>very inter traditions and quite conservative, and that gen Z

0:27:04.674 --> 0:27:07.714
<v Speaker 2>had then been the pushback on that. But the other

0:27:07.914 --> 0:27:10.674
<v Speaker 2>theory that's out there is just that all the stats

0:27:10.674 --> 0:27:13.274
<v Speaker 2>say that people are having less sex full.

0:27:13.074 --> 0:27:14.714
<v Speaker 1>Stop, the sex recession.

0:27:14.834 --> 0:27:19.074
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so particularly younger people are having less sex full stop,

0:27:19.154 --> 0:27:22.034
<v Speaker 2>and so that follows on that there's less extra marital

0:27:22.114 --> 0:27:25.354
<v Speaker 2>sex because and this is also a little bit depressing

0:27:25.754 --> 0:27:28.434
<v Speaker 2>they're probably just watching a lot of Porner. Oh maybe

0:27:28.474 --> 0:27:31.394
<v Speaker 2>they've got AI boss like we talked about on Monday.

0:27:31.674 --> 0:27:36.434
<v Speaker 2>Does that classify if you've designed your perfect serena girlfriend?

0:27:37.114 --> 0:27:37.954
<v Speaker 2>Is that cheating?

0:27:38.234 --> 0:27:40.754
<v Speaker 1>Something you said before has really stuck with me, Holly

0:27:40.794 --> 0:27:43.874
<v Speaker 1>about this idea that it's never been easier to cheat,

0:27:44.074 --> 0:27:46.194
<v Speaker 1>But it's also, in a way, never been harder to

0:27:46.314 --> 0:27:50.554
<v Speaker 1>cheat because we are so used to higher levels of surveillance,

0:27:50.634 --> 0:27:53.514
<v Speaker 1>both from our partner and from the tech companies. It's

0:27:53.514 --> 0:27:57.434
<v Speaker 1>the tracking, it's the tracking cracking. I think millennials are.

0:27:57.314 --> 0:28:00.554
<v Speaker 2>Just too scared to cheat, They're too savvy to cheat.

0:28:00.474 --> 0:28:02.834
<v Speaker 4>Because you've got your what's the app that Maya's got

0:28:02.834 --> 0:28:03.234
<v Speaker 4>to fall on?

0:28:03.394 --> 0:28:04.914
<v Speaker 2>Glabe sixty, You're like.

0:28:04.954 --> 0:28:05.634
<v Speaker 4>Where are you?

0:28:06.154 --> 0:28:08.553
<v Speaker 2>I can see where you are. It's true, it's like

0:28:08.674 --> 0:28:11.874
<v Speaker 2>easier and harder at the same time. It's technology. Technology

0:28:11.874 --> 0:28:12.834
<v Speaker 2>has done something good.

0:28:12.994 --> 0:28:15.834
<v Speaker 3>Perhaps I came across this great post, which I think

0:28:15.914 --> 0:28:18.033
<v Speaker 3>is actually about jen Z, But I came across this

0:28:18.114 --> 0:28:20.594
<v Speaker 3>great post this week that said I have a theory

0:28:20.754 --> 0:28:23.674
<v Speaker 3>that if you ask basically anybody alive today how their

0:28:23.714 --> 0:28:27.674
<v Speaker 3>parents met, the story would violate at least one arbitrary

0:28:27.834 --> 0:28:31.514
<v Speaker 3>zoomer dating rule and that's why nobody's having kids now.

0:28:31.994 --> 0:28:34.513
<v Speaker 3>And it says age gap asked out at work, asked

0:28:34.514 --> 0:28:39.354
<v Speaker 3>out multiple times, co workers, boss slash employee, and basically

0:28:40.354 --> 0:28:44.554
<v Speaker 3>you need to break really serious social rules in order

0:28:44.594 --> 0:28:47.114
<v Speaker 3>to find love. And I loved this because I was

0:28:47.154 --> 0:28:51.034
<v Speaker 3>at a funeral recently and it's like he decided he

0:28:51.114 --> 0:28:54.794
<v Speaker 3>loved Patty, but Patty said he was too short and

0:28:54.954 --> 0:28:59.914
<v Speaker 3>too poor. But he decided to corner Patty and force

0:29:00.034 --> 0:29:03.194
<v Speaker 3>Patty into marriage, and they had eleven children and it

0:29:03.314 --> 0:29:05.114
<v Speaker 3>was a love story for the ages.

0:29:05.234 --> 0:29:07.074
<v Speaker 4>And it's like and everyone cried.

0:29:07.354 --> 0:29:12.154
<v Speaker 3>It is like, hold, they're together again, and Patty's probably

0:29:12.194 --> 0:29:14.194
<v Speaker 3>been dead for ten years, going, Thank the fuck, I

0:29:14.194 --> 0:29:16.874
<v Speaker 3>get some time on my earn from this creepy guy

0:29:16.914 --> 0:29:18.314
<v Speaker 3>who stalks me my whole life.

0:29:19.114 --> 0:29:19.874
<v Speaker 1>That's true.

0:29:20.794 --> 0:29:21.914
<v Speaker 2>It's so good.

0:29:22.434 --> 0:29:25.234
<v Speaker 3>After the break the essay about cosmetic surgery, I have

0:29:25.394 --> 0:29:29.234
<v Speaker 3>not stopped thinking about. From Emma Stone to Miley Cyrus,

0:29:29.434 --> 0:29:33.154
<v Speaker 3>why the Hugo girl approach is actually a massive.

0:29:32.834 --> 0:29:37.474
<v Speaker 2>Problem One Unlimited out Loud access. We drop episodes every

0:29:37.514 --> 0:29:41.874
<v Speaker 2>Tuesday and Thursday exclusively for Mamma Mia subscribers. Follow the

0:29:41.874 --> 0:29:43.474
<v Speaker 2>link at the show notes to get us in your

0:29:43.474 --> 0:29:46.674
<v Speaker 2>ears five days a week, and a huge thank you

0:29:46.794 --> 0:29:48.194
<v Speaker 2>to all our current.

0:29:47.954 --> 0:29:55.034
<v Speaker 4>Subscribers Black Fridays around the corner.

0:29:55.034 --> 0:29:57.154
<v Speaker 3>It's only next week now, But what if I told

0:29:57.194 --> 0:30:01.394
<v Speaker 3>you that you don't need that fancy goo Holly, no fancy.

0:30:02.194 --> 0:30:07.634
<v Speaker 2>Sorry, we're talking about all the skincare products are waving

0:30:07.674 --> 0:30:08.994
<v Speaker 2>for Black Friday to kick in.

0:30:09.754 --> 0:30:11.714
<v Speaker 4>I think is gonna she's gonna fill.

0:30:11.594 --> 0:30:15.954
<v Speaker 1>Up on its comment here, exactly right.

0:30:17.154 --> 0:30:19.714
<v Speaker 4>That also, I don't want cash to comment.

0:30:19.794 --> 0:30:20.914
<v Speaker 1>I want comment.

0:30:21.434 --> 0:30:25.714
<v Speaker 2>You could telling me we don't need that expensive stuff.

0:30:25.714 --> 0:30:28.154
<v Speaker 3>We don't need we don't need a face mask or

0:30:29.194 --> 0:30:32.234
<v Speaker 3>because the most effective beauty trend is entirely free.

0:30:32.594 --> 0:30:33.554
<v Speaker 4>Ladies have we.

0:30:33.914 --> 0:30:36.674
<v Speaker 1>Say good night's sleep, I'm going to I'm not.

0:30:36.594 --> 0:30:41.394
<v Speaker 3>Gonna dare say water. I'm not gonna say water. Menstrel mask,

0:30:41.514 --> 0:30:44.834
<v Speaker 3>Oh hear me out? Putting menstrual blood on your face

0:30:45.434 --> 0:30:48.074
<v Speaker 3>as a form of skin care has exploded.

0:30:49.874 --> 0:30:51.874
<v Speaker 1>Explode exploded, It's exploded.

0:30:52.514 --> 0:30:53.914
<v Speaker 4>It's clotted all over the.

0:30:55.434 --> 0:30:57.474
<v Speaker 1>Damn it, Jesse, there goes your.

0:30:59.034 --> 0:31:03.914
<v Speaker 3>Okay, so it contains stem cells something called Sieto themselves

0:31:03.954 --> 0:31:04.314
<v Speaker 3>are good.

0:31:04.314 --> 0:31:09.194
<v Speaker 1>I see them on expense a lot of money.

0:31:08.114 --> 0:31:12.754
<v Speaker 3>I didn't see peptides but I did see proteins, and

0:31:12.794 --> 0:31:13.794
<v Speaker 3>Holly loves proteins.

0:31:14.434 --> 0:31:15.514
<v Speaker 2>Cottage is like.

0:31:15.474 --> 0:31:19.514
<v Speaker 4>Cottage sheets, and it rejuvenates the skin. Apparently. Apparently it's

0:31:19.514 --> 0:31:22.114
<v Speaker 4>also healing and empowering, But so is thatcher.

0:31:22.474 --> 0:31:28.914
<v Speaker 3>So scientists say it can help with wound healing, but

0:31:29.114 --> 0:31:33.314
<v Speaker 3>otherwise they will step back from saying conclusively it makes

0:31:33.314 --> 0:31:36.154
<v Speaker 3>you hot. That's scientist is like, we're not going to

0:31:36.194 --> 0:31:41.154
<v Speaker 3>say that Holly is menstrual masking the answer to everything.

0:31:41.194 --> 0:31:43.874
<v Speaker 3>But capitalism is getting defensive because it wants.

0:31:43.674 --> 0:31:48.114
<v Speaker 2>To buy just more proof of elitist ages around here.

0:31:48.954 --> 0:31:53.714
<v Speaker 2>Blood is very hard to combine. Try and steal it

0:31:53.714 --> 0:32:00.034
<v Speaker 2>from my young I guess.

0:31:58.394 --> 0:31:59.954
<v Speaker 4>Now, who needs the millennials?

0:32:01.714 --> 0:32:05.834
<v Speaker 2>Am I into this idea? No, I'm sure it is

0:32:05.914 --> 0:32:06.834
<v Speaker 2>probably true.

0:32:07.394 --> 0:32:12.314
<v Speaker 1>Yes, you think it reminds me of you know, Jermaine

0:32:12.354 --> 0:32:15.394
<v Speaker 1>Greer in The Female Unit. She says that should be

0:32:15.474 --> 0:32:17.994
<v Speaker 1>fully empowered as a woman, you need to taste your

0:32:17.994 --> 0:32:21.234
<v Speaker 1>own menstrual blood. Now, this was before sheep masks were invented.

0:32:21.314 --> 0:32:23.474
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure she would have said make a face mask

0:32:23.554 --> 0:32:25.834
<v Speaker 1>of your menstrual blood if that was something in the

0:32:25.874 --> 0:32:26.914
<v Speaker 1>culture at the time.

0:32:27.474 --> 0:32:28.674
<v Speaker 4>I like the idea of trying it.

0:32:28.714 --> 0:32:31.474
<v Speaker 3>I like the idea that we've always had all the

0:32:31.514 --> 0:32:33.674
<v Speaker 3>goo we need, but we've just never used it.

0:32:33.994 --> 0:32:35.794
<v Speaker 2>Look inside yourself.

0:32:35.994 --> 0:32:38.594
<v Speaker 3>You'll and you'll find it. It's just lots ago different

0:32:38.634 --> 0:32:42.434
<v Speaker 3>times of the month that we can try. Look, don't

0:32:42.474 --> 0:32:46.634
<v Speaker 3>try this at home, or do you guys, it's absolutely fine.

0:32:47.034 --> 0:32:50.034
<v Speaker 3>I think your daughter Matilda would be horrified if you

0:32:50.034 --> 0:32:51.714
<v Speaker 3>showed up with your menstrual masking on.

0:32:52.634 --> 0:32:56.074
<v Speaker 2>But you know what you do, you friends. I'm bringing

0:32:56.114 --> 0:32:59.354
<v Speaker 2>two face topics to the table. Actually, we've just talked

0:32:59.434 --> 0:33:02.434
<v Speaker 2>about faces three, so I'm already breaking some taboos that

0:33:02.474 --> 0:33:05.074
<v Speaker 2>we're going to be exploring in a minute. One of

0:33:05.114 --> 0:33:07.834
<v Speaker 2>them is about the fact that nobody appears to have

0:33:07.994 --> 0:33:13.354
<v Speaker 2>eyelids anymore. Eyelids are over. I'm talking, of course, about

0:33:13.514 --> 0:33:15.834
<v Speaker 2>the bleth or the blepheroplasty.

0:33:16.114 --> 0:33:20.034
<v Speaker 3>Okay, can you explain what this is because it's something

0:33:20.274 --> 0:33:23.994
<v Speaker 3>that women around me of a certain age are talking about.

0:33:24.154 --> 0:33:25.754
<v Speaker 3>But I didn't know what a bleff was.

0:33:25.914 --> 0:33:29.874
<v Speaker 2>So a blef is the short social media friendly term

0:33:30.034 --> 0:33:33.194
<v Speaker 2>for a blethheroplasty, which is basically.

0:33:32.714 --> 0:33:33.674
<v Speaker 1>An eyelid lift.

0:33:34.034 --> 0:33:37.314
<v Speaker 2>And you know it's surgery. It's surgery that requires suitures

0:33:37.314 --> 0:33:39.554
<v Speaker 2>and recovery time. And all the rest of it. And

0:33:39.594 --> 0:33:44.034
<v Speaker 2>it's something that older women have sometimes been medically prescribed

0:33:44.074 --> 0:33:47.034
<v Speaker 2>this because drooping eyelids can become a real problem. But

0:33:47.114 --> 0:33:50.634
<v Speaker 2>it's really entered the mainstream just in the past even

0:33:50.674 --> 0:33:53.874
<v Speaker 2>i'd say like six to twelve months as this thing

0:33:53.914 --> 0:33:55.954
<v Speaker 2>the blef, I'm getting a bleath, I'm getting a bleth.

0:33:56.034 --> 0:33:58.834
<v Speaker 2>It's more a cosmetic choice and a medical And also

0:33:58.914 --> 0:34:01.154
<v Speaker 2>the age of those women seems to be dropping and

0:34:01.194 --> 0:34:04.394
<v Speaker 2>dropping and dropping. We're seeing all over social media before

0:34:04.514 --> 0:34:07.234
<v Speaker 2>us and afters of my bleth and my bleff recover

0:34:07.554 --> 0:34:10.834
<v Speaker 2>left left left like it's it feels like suddenly it's everywhere,

0:34:11.393 --> 0:34:15.154
<v Speaker 2>And it's also being very widely diagnosed as the reason

0:34:15.154 --> 0:34:18.953
<v Speaker 2>why a lot of young ish celebrity women in their

0:34:18.954 --> 0:34:21.554
<v Speaker 2>thirties who are being their faces are being talked about

0:34:21.834 --> 0:34:26.034
<v Speaker 2>about why they suddenly look fresher, more snatched, younger, all

0:34:26.034 --> 0:34:27.834
<v Speaker 2>that stuff, right, So this has led to a lot

0:34:27.834 --> 0:34:30.234
<v Speaker 2>of articles about like I thought it was the menstrual blood,

0:34:30.594 --> 0:34:33.794
<v Speaker 2>but probably now we know that. This has led to

0:34:33.834 --> 0:34:36.393
<v Speaker 2>lots of articles about, like, your eyelids are making you

0:34:36.434 --> 0:34:40.234
<v Speaker 2>look cold, eyelids are done, Like I'm.

0:34:40.114 --> 0:34:43.513
<v Speaker 1>Like I feel bad about to help like not get

0:34:43.554 --> 0:34:44.794
<v Speaker 1>particles into your eyes?

0:34:44.914 --> 0:34:47.994
<v Speaker 2>Is that not sore thing have a purpose? But there's

0:34:47.994 --> 0:34:50.114
<v Speaker 2>no question that. I mean, and some people have heavy

0:34:50.154 --> 0:34:53.553
<v Speaker 2>eyelids and hooded eyelids always, and obviously people from different

0:34:53.594 --> 0:34:56.634
<v Speaker 2>cultures and different backgrounds have different kind of eyelids, but

0:34:56.794 --> 0:34:59.554
<v Speaker 2>there is no question that broadly speaking, as you age,

0:34:59.594 --> 0:35:02.074
<v Speaker 2>they droop, and that lifting them a bit is generally

0:35:02.114 --> 0:35:04.714
<v Speaker 2>considered to make a lot younger. So suddenly it's left, left, left.

0:35:05.194 --> 0:35:07.434
<v Speaker 2>My question is for you, Jesse, because if you have

0:35:07.514 --> 0:35:11.114
<v Speaker 2>been talking NonStop about an essay that you read about

0:35:11.314 --> 0:35:15.914
<v Speaker 2>surgery and cosmetic procedures this week that encompasses this, why

0:35:16.154 --> 0:35:18.594
<v Speaker 2>suddenly we would all be pointing at one particular part

0:35:18.594 --> 0:35:21.354
<v Speaker 2>of a woman's face and saying that's the problem.

0:35:21.514 --> 0:35:21.993
<v Speaker 1>Fix that?

0:35:22.074 --> 0:35:25.114
<v Speaker 2>And why suddenly if you type bleff into TikTok, there

0:35:25.154 --> 0:35:28.834
<v Speaker 2>are hundreds of thousands of things that suddenly have appeared

0:35:28.874 --> 0:35:31.194
<v Speaker 2>from nowhere. Tell me about that essay.

0:35:31.514 --> 0:35:34.274
<v Speaker 3>So there's this essay doing the rounds on substack, and

0:35:34.354 --> 0:35:36.794
<v Speaker 3>I think it's something like a half hour read right,

0:35:37.234 --> 0:35:40.714
<v Speaker 3>The title is the anti Cosmetic Surgery Essay Every Woman

0:35:40.954 --> 0:35:41.513
<v Speaker 3>should Read.

0:35:41.674 --> 0:35:42.554
<v Speaker 4>Have you both read it?

0:35:42.634 --> 0:35:46.634
<v Speaker 1>Yes? Yes? Okay, so only because you told me, only

0:35:46.674 --> 0:35:49.514
<v Speaker 1>because you kept posting it and saying.

0:35:49.274 --> 0:35:52.074
<v Speaker 2>Read it did make me realize that all my newsletters

0:35:52.114 --> 0:35:54.674
<v Speaker 2>from now on should just be like the gardening tip

0:35:54.714 --> 0:36:01.154
<v Speaker 2>Henry woman should, every woman should read.

0:35:59.274 --> 0:36:00.914
<v Speaker 4>The rhyme should.

0:36:01.354 --> 0:36:02.714
<v Speaker 3>And I just loved as I kept going out, I

0:36:02.754 --> 0:36:04.114
<v Speaker 3>didn't hit a pay wall. I think I was just

0:36:04.154 --> 0:36:04.873
<v Speaker 3>really satisfied.

0:36:04.914 --> 0:36:06.714
<v Speaker 1>Can we just say that the reason why I caught

0:36:06.754 --> 0:36:10.714
<v Speaker 1>my eye initially is because it's accompanied by two pictures

0:36:10.754 --> 0:36:14.674
<v Speaker 1>of Miley Cyrus that are very confronting. It looks like

0:36:14.794 --> 0:36:19.114
<v Speaker 1>she has very gaunt cheeks, and I guess this is

0:36:19.114 --> 0:36:22.754
<v Speaker 1>connected with this buckle fat removal procedure that she's rumened

0:36:22.794 --> 0:36:23.314
<v Speaker 1>to have had.

0:36:23.634 --> 0:36:26.114
<v Speaker 4>She's looking almost unrecognizable.

0:36:26.154 --> 0:36:28.074
<v Speaker 3>She's one of the ones that is like almost like

0:36:28.114 --> 0:36:31.234
<v Speaker 3>the face is an extension of style and you can

0:36:31.274 --> 0:36:35.714
<v Speaker 3>get a bunch of surgery that might make you reinvent

0:36:35.914 --> 0:36:36.634
<v Speaker 3>entirely how.

0:36:36.514 --> 0:36:38.433
<v Speaker 2>You look in fashion for the moment too.

0:36:38.714 --> 0:36:39.514
<v Speaker 4>Yes, exactly.

0:36:39.634 --> 0:36:42.274
<v Speaker 3>And Emma Stone's face has been getting a lot of

0:36:42.394 --> 0:36:44.834
<v Speaker 3>analysis lately. Jennifer Lawrence has come out and talked about

0:36:44.834 --> 0:36:47.194
<v Speaker 3>some of the work that she's had done and Miley.

0:36:46.914 --> 0:36:50.354
<v Speaker 4>Cyrus and basically this writer she writes.

0:36:50.194 --> 0:36:52.553
<v Speaker 3>Under a pseudonym, which I think she's said too yeah,

0:36:52.594 --> 0:36:54.594
<v Speaker 3>which I thought was really telling. I don't think she

0:36:54.594 --> 0:36:58.074
<v Speaker 3>could write this under her name. Her pseudonym is father Karen.

0:36:58.754 --> 0:37:02.754
<v Speaker 3>She said that as women and within kind of traditional

0:37:02.794 --> 0:37:06.594
<v Speaker 3>feminist discourse, we now all have to hold hands and go, oh,

0:37:06.794 --> 0:37:10.634
<v Speaker 3>I yes, I feel sad that everyone has the same face. Now, oh,

0:37:10.714 --> 0:37:13.834
<v Speaker 3>well you do you you go, girl.

0:37:13.754 --> 0:37:17.754
<v Speaker 1>I'm miss Emma Stone's face. Yes, sad face emoji.

0:37:17.434 --> 0:37:18.994
<v Speaker 3>And you're allowed to kind of have that, but you

0:37:19.074 --> 0:37:21.154
<v Speaker 3>are not allowed to judge a woman's choices.

0:37:21.874 --> 0:37:24.314
<v Speaker 4>And I actually subscribe to that entirely.

0:37:24.514 --> 0:37:26.994
<v Speaker 3>I feel like we're all in this burning building, and

0:37:27.074 --> 0:37:29.714
<v Speaker 3>to judge a woman who goes down the cosmetic surgery

0:37:29.794 --> 0:37:32.554
<v Speaker 3>route is to judge her for jumping out of the

0:37:32.594 --> 0:37:35.994
<v Speaker 3>burning building, like I understand why you did it. But

0:37:36.114 --> 0:37:40.634
<v Speaker 3>what we're not allowed to do is then criticize or

0:37:41.034 --> 0:37:43.794
<v Speaker 3>analyze the trends, and in so doing, we're all kind

0:37:43.794 --> 0:37:48.234
<v Speaker 3>of holding up this beauty industrial complex that makes us

0:37:48.314 --> 0:37:49.354
<v Speaker 3>all sad.

0:37:49.434 --> 0:37:51.594
<v Speaker 2>And that's how point I saw that our eyelids need.

0:37:51.474 --> 0:37:56.154
<v Speaker 3>Fixing, exactly. And this is not making women happier. It's

0:37:56.194 --> 0:38:00.154
<v Speaker 3>not making women feel more beautiful studies and evidence that

0:38:00.234 --> 0:38:03.074
<v Speaker 3>this self objectifying that we're all doing, especially as the

0:38:03.074 --> 0:38:06.154
<v Speaker 3>world gets more and more scary and bleak, we're all

0:38:06.194 --> 0:38:08.834
<v Speaker 3>just going back into our bodies and going what can

0:38:08.874 --> 0:38:09.314
<v Speaker 3>I control?

0:38:09.354 --> 0:38:09.913
<v Speaker 4>What can I do?

0:38:10.674 --> 0:38:13.114
<v Speaker 3>And that what might start with a little bit of

0:38:13.154 --> 0:38:15.354
<v Speaker 3>anti wrinkle injections, it might become.

0:38:15.554 --> 0:38:18.514
<v Speaker 4>The bleff or the lips or the buckle fat removal

0:38:19.714 --> 0:38:20.274
<v Speaker 4>or whatever.

0:38:20.594 --> 0:38:21.993
<v Speaker 2>Do you blame facelift?

0:38:22.194 --> 0:38:26.634
<v Speaker 3>Yeap is just like this refocusing on ourselves that makes

0:38:26.714 --> 0:38:28.873
<v Speaker 3>us feel uglier and uglier and need more and more

0:38:28.914 --> 0:38:33.994
<v Speaker 3>and more work because a happy consumer is a bad consumer.

0:38:34.114 --> 0:38:36.073
<v Speaker 3>You're not going to go and just pay for things

0:38:36.074 --> 0:38:37.794
<v Speaker 3>that they need you to do. And the amount of

0:38:37.794 --> 0:38:40.794
<v Speaker 3>work now involved in the maintenance of the female form

0:38:41.194 --> 0:38:43.674
<v Speaker 3>is out of control. And can we all agree that

0:38:43.714 --> 0:38:48.754
<v Speaker 3>it's like from the micro needling to the facials, to

0:38:48.834 --> 0:38:52.433
<v Speaker 3>the heir, to the laser to the masks that we

0:38:52.434 --> 0:38:55.514
<v Speaker 3>wear it like it, it is totally out of control.

0:38:55.554 --> 0:38:58.994
<v Speaker 3>So I guess my question is do we feel like

0:38:59.034 --> 0:39:01.873
<v Speaker 3>we can have an honest conversation? And me has been

0:39:01.914 --> 0:39:04.314
<v Speaker 3>saying this for ages. May has been saying, you know,

0:39:04.394 --> 0:39:06.394
<v Speaker 3>it's the mprison new clothes. None of us are allowed

0:39:06.474 --> 0:39:08.594
<v Speaker 3>to say, what the hell is happening to everyone's faces

0:39:08.594 --> 0:39:10.913
<v Speaker 3>because we don't want to judge them? But do you

0:39:10.954 --> 0:39:13.634
<v Speaker 3>guys feel the same that it's come to a point

0:39:13.674 --> 0:39:17.873
<v Speaker 3>where it's like, we can't criticize the culture that is,

0:39:18.274 --> 0:39:20.794
<v Speaker 3>let's be real, it's ninety five percent women or something

0:39:20.834 --> 0:39:23.794
<v Speaker 3>like that that are going and getting these procedures. Are

0:39:23.794 --> 0:39:26.194
<v Speaker 3>we all comfortable with that? She calls it self mutilation.

0:39:26.274 --> 0:39:27.993
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if I'd go that far, but are

0:39:27.994 --> 0:39:28.913
<v Speaker 3>we comfortable with that?

0:39:29.074 --> 0:39:31.873
<v Speaker 2>I don't buy the idea that we're not talking about

0:39:31.914 --> 0:39:35.834
<v Speaker 2>women's faces. It's all the culture does all day, every day.

0:39:36.034 --> 0:39:39.553
<v Speaker 2>Like I agree with this woman's points on almost all

0:39:39.594 --> 0:39:42.954
<v Speaker 2>of it, but the starting point of we're not allowed

0:39:42.954 --> 0:39:46.834
<v Speaker 2>to talk about women's faces is just nonsense. Like Jennifer

0:39:46.874 --> 0:39:49.514
<v Speaker 2>Lawrence is a great example of this by all accounts.

0:39:49.554 --> 0:39:51.474
<v Speaker 2>That movie that she's in at the moment, that is

0:39:51.514 --> 0:39:55.394
<v Speaker 2>the reason that she's everywhere with Robert Pattinson. She turns

0:39:55.394 --> 0:39:59.593
<v Speaker 2>in the most astonishing performance in a really interesting role

0:39:59.994 --> 0:40:02.714
<v Speaker 2>about motherhood and mental health and all this craziness, and

0:40:02.754 --> 0:40:05.913
<v Speaker 2>she's wild in it. And the only headlines I have

0:40:05.954 --> 0:40:08.114
<v Speaker 2>seen about Jennifer Lawrence the last month have been about

0:40:08.114 --> 0:40:09.914
<v Speaker 2>her face, her boobs, that's it.

0:40:09.994 --> 0:40:12.953
<v Speaker 3>But don't you think they're all you go girl, they're

0:40:12.954 --> 0:40:13.754
<v Speaker 3>all like cheering.

0:40:14.074 --> 0:40:16.834
<v Speaker 2>I don't I think we all agree. Well, I don't

0:40:16.874 --> 0:40:19.154
<v Speaker 2>know that we all agree, but I'm certainly in agreement.

0:40:19.434 --> 0:40:21.114
<v Speaker 2>And I always have been with me A's point about

0:40:21.114 --> 0:40:23.394
<v Speaker 2>like what is happening here? And it's sick to a point,

0:40:23.434 --> 0:40:26.194
<v Speaker 2>not sick this is a strong word, but there's no

0:40:26.354 --> 0:40:29.393
<v Speaker 2>question we're all being led down a pass that is

0:40:29.434 --> 0:40:33.474
<v Speaker 2>a no win game, right, And I personally try and

0:40:33.514 --> 0:40:35.794
<v Speaker 2>resist it as much as I can within the realms

0:40:35.794 --> 0:40:41.674
<v Speaker 2>of serum buying. But I think that always wanting to

0:40:41.674 --> 0:40:44.154
<v Speaker 2>bring it back and hang it on We're not allowed

0:40:44.154 --> 0:40:48.234
<v Speaker 2>to talk about Emma Stone's face is disingenuous. All we

0:40:48.274 --> 0:40:51.194
<v Speaker 2>do is talk about Emma Stone's face. All we want

0:40:51.234 --> 0:40:55.234
<v Speaker 2>to do is prosecute this enormous issue through the prism

0:40:55.314 --> 0:40:57.714
<v Speaker 2>of one or two or three women that we want

0:40:57.754 --> 0:41:01.314
<v Speaker 2>to pick apart call monstrous. Basically, go look at her.

0:41:01.394 --> 0:41:04.554
<v Speaker 2>She must be insecure, look at her, she must be vain,

0:41:05.034 --> 0:41:07.754
<v Speaker 2>look at her like I think that's all all we do.

0:41:07.914 --> 0:41:10.194
<v Speaker 2>So I just don't really buy the idea that we're

0:41:10.234 --> 0:41:13.154
<v Speaker 2>not because I think that if we really felt we

0:41:13.154 --> 0:41:15.914
<v Speaker 2>couldn't talk about women's faces, we'd be talking about Jennifer

0:41:15.954 --> 0:41:17.434
<v Speaker 2>Lawrence's movie.

0:41:17.394 --> 0:41:18.434
<v Speaker 4>What do You Reckon? Amelia?

0:41:18.514 --> 0:41:20.593
<v Speaker 1>Look, I think it's clear that we can talk about

0:41:20.594 --> 0:41:22.913
<v Speaker 1>their faces. I agree with you, Holly, and we do

0:41:22.994 --> 0:41:25.234
<v Speaker 1>on this show as well. Let's not be disingenuous about it.

0:41:25.274 --> 0:41:28.874
<v Speaker 1>But why I found this piece really refreshing is because

0:41:29.034 --> 0:41:32.794
<v Speaker 1>it made me feel like I'm not a freak for

0:41:32.914 --> 0:41:36.274
<v Speaker 1>not buying into this. And I know that sounds funny

0:41:36.354 --> 0:41:41.114
<v Speaker 1>because it's becoming like unusual in my impression to not

0:41:41.194 --> 0:41:44.594
<v Speaker 1>opt into this game. So I appreciated that she was like, oh,

0:41:44.634 --> 0:41:47.514
<v Speaker 1>the writer said, this is not normal. You don't have

0:41:47.634 --> 0:41:49.634
<v Speaker 1>to do this. And in fact, it's an arms race

0:41:49.674 --> 0:41:53.514
<v Speaker 1>that women will never win because the only beauty standard

0:41:53.754 --> 0:41:57.794
<v Speaker 1>that remains the same from generation to generation is youth,

0:41:58.154 --> 0:42:02.114
<v Speaker 1>actual youth, not simulated youth, and beauty standards other than

0:42:02.154 --> 0:42:04.754
<v Speaker 1>youth change all the time. For instance, we started this

0:42:04.834 --> 0:42:09.194
<v Speaker 1>by talking about droopy eyelids. Phrase droopy island seems insane,

0:42:09.274 --> 0:42:11.754
<v Speaker 1>but it is out there. I want to point out

0:42:11.794 --> 0:42:16.554
<v Speaker 1>that Sydney Sweeney, Marilyn Monroe, Charlotte Rampling, all these women

0:42:16.914 --> 0:42:22.314
<v Speaker 1>have famously quote unquote droopy islands bed droomise. In another

0:42:22.474 --> 0:42:25.913
<v Speaker 1>era this was beddroomies, but now they're droopy. So the

0:42:25.954 --> 0:42:28.794
<v Speaker 1>point is you can't win, and I found that really refreshing.

0:42:29.074 --> 0:42:31.314
<v Speaker 2>Here's something though, that I want to ask you as

0:42:31.354 --> 0:42:33.433
<v Speaker 2>you go to the next point, Jesse, is that the

0:42:33.514 --> 0:42:36.114
<v Speaker 2>thing is and this is the point of the woman's article. Really,

0:42:36.554 --> 0:42:39.354
<v Speaker 2>So Australia has one of the biggest updates of cosmetic

0:42:39.394 --> 0:42:42.074
<v Speaker 2>procedures per capita in the world, big in the US,

0:42:42.274 --> 0:42:45.433
<v Speaker 2>so the most recent stats, and they do come from

0:42:45.474 --> 0:42:49.154
<v Speaker 2>a medical and cosmetic surgical institute, but the most recent

0:42:49.194 --> 0:42:52.913
<v Speaker 2>stats suggest that twenty two percent of Australians have had

0:42:52.914 --> 0:42:56.834
<v Speaker 2>a cosmetic procedure, and that twenty five percent of millennials have,

0:42:57.354 --> 0:42:59.834
<v Speaker 2>and that something like thirty eight percent would like to

0:42:59.994 --> 0:43:02.554
<v Speaker 2>or planning to in the next ten years. She's just

0:43:02.674 --> 0:43:06.274
<v Speaker 2>so internalized agism for all the reasons you just said, Amelia,

0:43:06.394 --> 0:43:09.234
<v Speaker 2>that she looks in the mirror, goes, I don't really

0:43:09.234 --> 0:43:11.873
<v Speaker 2>recognize that person. I know how we all feel and

0:43:11.914 --> 0:43:15.873
<v Speaker 2>mock women who are looking older. So She's right, we

0:43:16.034 --> 0:43:18.754
<v Speaker 2>are all being led down this road is the cure

0:43:18.834 --> 0:43:22.073
<v Speaker 2>for it, though, to point out and mock the women

0:43:22.074 --> 0:43:24.314
<v Speaker 2>I were doing that, And that's where I think we

0:43:24.354 --> 0:43:25.794
<v Speaker 2>are always led back to.

0:43:25.994 --> 0:43:27.913
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and that's what I hate. And I also hate

0:43:27.914 --> 0:43:31.194
<v Speaker 3>when we get to and they look ugly anyway, or

0:43:31.234 --> 0:43:33.274
<v Speaker 3>they look ugly in a new way, which.

0:43:33.034 --> 0:43:35.754
<v Speaker 1>Is what's implied by the author's choice of these really

0:43:35.834 --> 0:43:38.874
<v Speaker 1>startling images of Miley Cyrus to go with the piece.

0:43:38.954 --> 0:43:42.514
<v Speaker 1>The photos are not what you would call conventionally attractive.

0:43:42.834 --> 0:43:45.514
<v Speaker 1>They stop you in your tracks, they stop you scrolling.

0:43:45.594 --> 0:43:48.754
<v Speaker 1>She looks really undernourished in them in a way that

0:43:48.834 --> 0:43:51.594
<v Speaker 1>is alarming. So the author knew what she was doing

0:43:51.634 --> 0:43:53.434
<v Speaker 1>by drawing us in with those photos.

0:43:53.554 --> 0:43:56.354
<v Speaker 3>Yes, And she says it explicitly about some people in

0:43:56.394 --> 0:43:58.354
<v Speaker 3>the public eye, and it's like, you did all of

0:43:58.354 --> 0:44:01.554
<v Speaker 3>this and you still don't look good, which is almost

0:44:02.034 --> 0:44:05.834
<v Speaker 3>the inevitable treadmill of like you'll get a little bit

0:44:05.954 --> 0:44:09.114
<v Speaker 3>and then you'll get so taken down this and then

0:44:09.154 --> 0:44:11.913
<v Speaker 3>guess what, the filler's going to be out of date

0:44:12.354 --> 0:44:14.553
<v Speaker 3>and there's going to be a new trend in and

0:44:15.074 --> 0:44:18.114
<v Speaker 3>you're not going to be beautiful by those standards. But Holly,

0:44:18.194 --> 0:44:21.114
<v Speaker 3>you said something about like women doing those procedures to

0:44:21.194 --> 0:44:23.993
<v Speaker 3>kind of keep their status. And one thing I found.

0:44:24.034 --> 0:44:25.514
<v Speaker 3>I talked about this at the live show, and I

0:44:25.514 --> 0:44:29.073
<v Speaker 3>haven't been comfortable talking about it on this show for a.

0:44:28.754 --> 0:44:29.634
<v Speaker 4>Myriad of reasons.

0:44:29.634 --> 0:44:33.074
<v Speaker 3>But I after I had Luna and I was feeling

0:44:33.194 --> 0:44:36.754
<v Speaker 3>you know, haggard and doing TV and doing this and

0:44:36.834 --> 0:44:40.434
<v Speaker 3>video and blah blah blah, I had anti wrinkle injections.

0:44:40.434 --> 0:44:42.354
<v Speaker 3>And before I go into it is like to speak

0:44:42.354 --> 0:44:45.234
<v Speaker 3>to your doctor, I'm not recommending this procedure. This was

0:44:45.274 --> 0:44:47.994
<v Speaker 3>just my experience and that, like it sounds like a

0:44:47.994 --> 0:44:49.873
<v Speaker 3>big thing to say, to say betrayed my values. But

0:44:49.914 --> 0:44:52.274
<v Speaker 3>I kind of always went I'm not going to do it, and.

0:44:52.194 --> 0:44:54.513
<v Speaker 4>Then one day I just went, screw it. I want

0:44:54.514 --> 0:44:55.354
<v Speaker 4>to have more kids.

0:44:55.394 --> 0:44:57.314
<v Speaker 3>There's a moment in my life where I can get

0:44:57.674 --> 0:44:58.873
<v Speaker 3>anti wrinkle injections.

0:44:58.914 --> 0:44:59.953
<v Speaker 4>And I went and did it.

0:45:00.234 --> 0:45:02.594
<v Speaker 3>I didn't do it for status. What I did it

0:45:02.674 --> 0:45:05.913
<v Speaker 3>for was to turn the voice off, was to.

0:45:05.834 --> 0:45:09.034
<v Speaker 4>Turn the inner monologue.

0:45:08.034 --> 0:45:09.873
<v Speaker 3>That every day it's going look at the lines on

0:45:09.914 --> 0:45:11.194
<v Speaker 3>your feat, look at the lines on your froat. And

0:45:11.234 --> 0:45:14.514
<v Speaker 3>I thought, if I could quieten that, maybe my brain

0:45:14.594 --> 0:45:17.474
<v Speaker 3>could think about other, bigger, more important things and it

0:45:17.514 --> 0:45:18.474
<v Speaker 3>would be freeing.

0:45:18.674 --> 0:45:20.953
<v Speaker 4>And I thought that getting that would turn it off.

0:45:21.354 --> 0:45:22.434
<v Speaker 4>It didn't.

0:45:22.834 --> 0:45:25.874
<v Speaker 3>In fact, it made me more obsessed with my appearance.

0:45:25.874 --> 0:45:27.714
<v Speaker 3>I've never looked in the mirror so much. I didn't

0:45:27.754 --> 0:45:29.914
<v Speaker 3>think it looked right. I thought it looked all uneven.

0:45:29.994 --> 0:45:33.594
<v Speaker 3>I felt claustrophobic in my own face. I didn't feel

0:45:33.634 --> 0:45:35.913
<v Speaker 3>like myself. I couldn't emote all of these things, and

0:45:35.954 --> 0:45:37.994
<v Speaker 3>I went, I hate it. I'm not doing it again.

0:45:38.114 --> 0:45:40.794
<v Speaker 3>Maybe it does turn off the monologue, but it's like

0:45:40.834 --> 0:45:43.354
<v Speaker 3>the issue is that in a monologue.

0:45:42.834 --> 0:45:46.473
<v Speaker 1>And of course individual women's experiences with these procedures may vary.

0:45:46.514 --> 0:45:48.953
<v Speaker 1>But one thing that I really wanted to highlight from

0:45:48.954 --> 0:45:52.433
<v Speaker 1>the essay is that it points to empirical evidence that

0:45:52.514 --> 0:45:55.873
<v Speaker 1>shows that cosmetic work does not improve your long term happiness,

0:45:55.914 --> 0:45:59.834
<v Speaker 1>and it actually increases Obviously, again, this is population wide

0:46:00.114 --> 0:46:03.873
<v Speaker 1>increases symptoms of depression and anxiety. So we really are

0:46:03.874 --> 0:46:05.034
<v Speaker 1>in a treadmill.

0:46:04.674 --> 0:46:07.954
<v Speaker 3>And even things like sexual dysfunction or eating disorders, because

0:46:07.954 --> 0:46:11.194
<v Speaker 3>it's like you're not in touch with how you feel

0:46:11.274 --> 0:46:13.834
<v Speaker 3>or what you want. It's it's this kind of perpetuating

0:46:13.874 --> 0:46:16.554
<v Speaker 3>the self objectifying narrative.

0:46:16.994 --> 0:46:19.634
<v Speaker 2>I get all that so much, and I am al

0:46:19.674 --> 0:46:22.473
<v Speaker 2>so you know, because of our jobs, we're looking at

0:46:22.474 --> 0:46:24.594
<v Speaker 2>our face is probably more than the average person because

0:46:24.594 --> 0:46:28.114
<v Speaker 2>we're on camera as the gen xer at the table.

0:46:28.754 --> 0:46:31.234
<v Speaker 2>I do struggle all the time in that I'm like,

0:46:31.314 --> 0:46:34.194
<v Speaker 2>look at my neckline, look at my look. Yeah, so

0:46:34.394 --> 0:46:37.554
<v Speaker 2>the noise I so relate to it, Jesse. But the

0:46:37.674 --> 0:46:41.914
<v Speaker 2>problem that I have is still because I also genuinely

0:46:41.994 --> 0:46:44.194
<v Speaker 2>do not judge women who are doing whatever they're doing,

0:46:44.234 --> 0:46:46.354
<v Speaker 2>because I just think we are all in this game

0:46:46.354 --> 0:46:47.274
<v Speaker 2>that we're talking.

0:46:47.034 --> 0:46:49.714
<v Speaker 4>About, and we're all playing it to a different degree.

0:46:49.754 --> 0:46:52.154
<v Speaker 2>And I think that the problem with as I said,

0:46:52.194 --> 0:46:55.314
<v Speaker 2>the problem with this essay and this kind of narrative

0:46:55.514 --> 0:46:58.754
<v Speaker 2>is it wants us to go back to picking women's faces,

0:46:58.794 --> 0:47:03.034
<v Speaker 2>our own and others, without shame, without fear or favor

0:47:03.114 --> 0:47:06.154
<v Speaker 2>like which I think. I don't think that's the answer.

0:47:06.194 --> 0:47:09.074
<v Speaker 2>I actually think the answer is less attention less talk

0:47:09.154 --> 0:47:11.794
<v Speaker 2>about it. Less. The fact that any woman steps into

0:47:11.794 --> 0:47:13.914
<v Speaker 2>the public arena, whether it's on a TV show or

0:47:14.714 --> 0:47:17.074
<v Speaker 2>in politics or whatever, that the first thing we all

0:47:17.114 --> 0:47:19.474
<v Speaker 2>talk about is her face and what she's done to it.

0:47:19.554 --> 0:47:22.154
<v Speaker 2>I think that would actually be real progress.

0:47:22.514 --> 0:47:23.953
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think I'm with you. I think we talk

0:47:23.994 --> 0:47:24.714
<v Speaker 4>about it too much.

0:47:25.554 --> 0:47:28.034
<v Speaker 2>A massive thank you to you out louders for listening

0:47:28.114 --> 0:47:30.513
<v Speaker 2>to today's show and to our fabulous team for putting

0:47:30.554 --> 0:47:33.834
<v Speaker 2>it together. Remember you can always watch us on YouTube.

0:47:33.914 --> 0:47:36.274
<v Speaker 2>But we're going to be back in your ears tomorrow, Jesse.

0:47:36.114 --> 0:47:39.154
<v Speaker 1>Before we go, Yeah, you know how out Loud sets

0:47:39.154 --> 0:47:41.034
<v Speaker 1>you up for the week. Well that's what our listeners

0:47:41.074 --> 0:47:43.834
<v Speaker 1>tell us. Yeah, well now they have something to get

0:47:43.914 --> 0:47:45.474
<v Speaker 1>them through the weekend too, and it's parenting.

0:47:45.714 --> 0:47:47.234
<v Speaker 4>I love my parenting out Loud.

0:47:47.314 --> 0:47:49.953
<v Speaker 3>You Stacey Hicks, Monic Bully, But I hear that there's

0:47:49.954 --> 0:47:50.593
<v Speaker 3>a special guest.

0:47:50.874 --> 0:47:54.274
<v Speaker 1>Special guest this week one Luca Levine, dad of one,

0:47:54.394 --> 0:47:57.354
<v Speaker 1>father to be of twins. Was he very nervous.

0:47:57.674 --> 0:47:59.994
<v Speaker 3>He was, and he asked me how to pitch. He

0:48:00.874 --> 0:48:04.393
<v Speaker 3>had no idea, like where to start. But I love

0:48:04.474 --> 0:48:06.554
<v Speaker 3>this idea. I'm encouraging him to.

0:48:06.474 --> 0:48:08.594
<v Speaker 4>Become a parent. I would love that because I feel

0:48:08.634 --> 0:48:10.994
<v Speaker 4>like it's something I could outsource. And I'm like, maybe

0:48:11.474 --> 0:48:13.034
<v Speaker 4>you could like be like.

0:48:13.154 --> 0:48:13.914
<v Speaker 2>The primary parent.

0:48:15.114 --> 0:48:16.594
<v Speaker 4>Let's just go with it.

0:48:17.034 --> 0:48:20.314
<v Speaker 3>But look, he's a great dad and he has lots

0:48:20.354 --> 0:48:21.954
<v Speaker 3>of wisdom and lots of insights.

0:48:21.994 --> 0:48:25.194
<v Speaker 1>I also just love it's very parenting out Loud to

0:48:25.234 --> 0:48:28.074
<v Speaker 1>say you know what. We need to get a guy's

0:48:28.154 --> 0:48:31.393
<v Speaker 1>perspective on things too, exactly. It's not meant to be

0:48:31.554 --> 0:48:33.674
<v Speaker 1>like your everyday regular parenting show.

0:48:33.754 --> 0:48:36.114
<v Speaker 3>It's meant to be a little bit more out of

0:48:36.154 --> 0:48:38.674
<v Speaker 3>the box. And quotas are important. We believe in quotas,

0:48:38.954 --> 0:48:39.873
<v Speaker 3>so we did need to.

0:48:41.474 --> 0:48:43.074
<v Speaker 1>So look, I'll just tell you quickly what's on the

0:48:43.074 --> 0:48:44.993
<v Speaker 1>show because it sounds like a great lineup. You taught

0:48:45.074 --> 0:48:46.074
<v Speaker 1>him well on pitching.

0:48:46.354 --> 0:48:48.594
<v Speaker 3>I don't know what that you guys talk about yet though,

0:48:48.634 --> 0:48:49.154
<v Speaker 3>but what is it?

0:48:49.154 --> 0:48:52.594
<v Speaker 1>Well, apparently Kinetic sand has been canceled. Oh yes, yes,

0:48:52.834 --> 0:48:56.194
<v Speaker 1>there's a trend that's fighting against Black Friday sales and

0:48:56.234 --> 0:48:58.594
<v Speaker 1>apparently it's very delightful, which is good because I'm so

0:48:58.714 --> 0:49:01.754
<v Speaker 1>not into Black Friday sales now I need an antidote.

0:49:01.874 --> 0:49:05.274
<v Speaker 1>And also, are you doing nappy changes mindfully? Is this

0:49:05.434 --> 0:49:09.634
<v Speaker 1>something that Luca makes you do like mindful nappy changes? Anyway,

0:49:09.634 --> 0:49:11.354
<v Speaker 1>he's going to tell us all about it on the shows.

0:49:11.394 --> 0:49:12.554
<v Speaker 4>Okay, I love it here.

0:49:13.074 --> 0:49:15.634
<v Speaker 1>So if you love out Loud, this is your weekend

0:49:15.674 --> 0:49:18.314
<v Speaker 1>fixed search parenting out Loud and hit follow.

0:49:29.434 --> 0:49:32.074
<v Speaker 4>Is it ten years today?

0:49:33.234 --> 0:49:33.953
<v Speaker 2>Shut up.

0:49:35.474 --> 0:49:43.154
<v Speaker 1>Is to you, hippy, that's astir of my line.

0:49:45.474 --> 0:49:48.634
<v Speaker 4>Ten years, A lot's happened, A lot's.

0:49:48.354 --> 0:49:50.913
<v Speaker 2>Happened, A lot happen happened, Jesse ste.

0:49:51.114 --> 0:49:53.234
<v Speaker 4>Oh, my goodness, who would.

0:49:52.994 --> 0:49:56.473
<v Speaker 2>Have thought as a listener to out Loud who you

0:49:56.514 --> 0:49:58.034
<v Speaker 2>also were a listener to out Loud?

0:49:58.074 --> 0:49:59.714
<v Speaker 1>Walk and you were the boss ab out Loud walking

0:49:59.754 --> 0:50:02.074
<v Speaker 1>in the door that day with no shoes.

0:50:02.474 --> 0:50:05.194
<v Speaker 4>No, exactly right. I had shoes on, but I wasn't

0:50:05.234 --> 0:50:07.314
<v Speaker 4>dressed appropriately. You were.

0:50:07.354 --> 0:50:07.553
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:50:07.714 --> 0:50:10.194
<v Speaker 3>And I had a meeting with you and and her

0:50:10.274 --> 0:50:13.354
<v Speaker 3>and she was good cop, Hollywood, good cop. You were

0:50:13.394 --> 0:50:14.274
<v Speaker 3>just chaos.

0:50:14.474 --> 0:50:18.393
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, No one knew and so much changed. And I

0:50:18.514 --> 0:50:21.634
<v Speaker 2>just knew that one day you'd be pushing some of

0:50:21.674 --> 0:50:22.314
<v Speaker 2>my DNA.

0:50:22.914 --> 0:50:25.154
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I knew that efficiently.

0:50:25.234 --> 0:50:26.714
<v Speaker 1>No, who would have known you?

0:50:26.834 --> 0:50:32.913
<v Speaker 4>Just that's the most ever that I would have no idea?

0:50:32.994 --> 0:50:33.473
<v Speaker 2>What it's two?

0:50:33.874 --> 0:50:35.594
<v Speaker 1>And everyone's kept saying to me, what shoud we get

0:50:35.674 --> 0:50:37.154
<v Speaker 1>Jesse for a present? What should we get it for

0:50:37.154 --> 0:50:38.794
<v Speaker 1>a ten year president? I'm I don't know. She doesn't

0:50:38.874 --> 0:50:39.394
<v Speaker 1>like stuff.

0:50:40.194 --> 0:50:40.994
<v Speaker 4>That's true.

0:50:42.394 --> 0:50:42.994
<v Speaker 1>It's true.

0:50:47.794 --> 0:50:50.754
<v Speaker 3>Mom and Maya acknowledges the traditional owners of the land

0:50:50.794 --> 0:50:52.714
<v Speaker 3>on which we have recorded this podcast