WEBVTT - Adam Brody's Bright Green Flags

0:00:10.287 --> 0:00:13.047
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to a MoMA mea podcast.

0:00:13.727 --> 0:00:16.767
<v Speaker 2>Mama Mayer acknowledges the traditional owners of land and waters

0:00:16.807 --> 0:00:18.407
<v Speaker 2>that this podcast is recorded on.

0:00:22.167 --> 0:00:24.167
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Mom and me are out loud what women

0:00:24.167 --> 0:00:27.647
<v Speaker 1>are actually talking about on Monday, the fourteenth of October.

0:00:27.767 --> 0:00:28.167
<v Speaker 1>I'm me of.

0:00:28.207 --> 0:00:31.327
<v Speaker 3>Friedman, I'm Jesse Stevens, and I'm Vannon filling in for

0:00:31.407 --> 0:00:33.087
<v Speaker 3>Holly Today. You can normally hear me.

0:00:33.127 --> 0:00:35.767
<v Speaker 2>On our daily entertainment podcast A Spell.

0:00:35.647 --> 0:00:37.527
<v Speaker 1>And on the show today Welcome in.

0:00:37.647 --> 0:00:38.607
<v Speaker 2>By the way, thank you.

0:00:38.607 --> 0:00:39.967
<v Speaker 1>You were meant to be here last week, but you

0:00:40.047 --> 0:00:40.567
<v Speaker 1>chucked Asiki.

0:00:40.647 --> 0:00:42.607
<v Speaker 2>I chucked to Siki. I know you hate that. I

0:00:42.847 --> 0:00:43.967
<v Speaker 2>noted just inspired.

0:00:44.047 --> 0:00:44.847
<v Speaker 1>Were you very sick?

0:00:45.127 --> 0:00:46.487
<v Speaker 2>I was properly sick.

0:00:46.807 --> 0:00:48.807
<v Speaker 3>Now. I can't even say that I was probably sick

0:00:48.847 --> 0:00:50.367
<v Speaker 3>because I don't sound believable.

0:00:50.447 --> 0:00:54.087
<v Speaker 1>No, I trust you. Nicole Kidman and Keith Urbans teenage

0:00:54.167 --> 0:00:56.927
<v Speaker 1>daughter Sunday Rose walk the runway for Me Me last week.

0:00:57.007 --> 0:01:00.407
<v Speaker 1>Kim Kardashian's interview with her twin daughter is going viral,

0:01:00.807 --> 0:01:04.207
<v Speaker 1>but one Australian businesswoman an influencer, has taken a very

0:01:04.207 --> 0:01:07.287
<v Speaker 1>different approach to how she puts her child on social

0:01:07.327 --> 0:01:10.847
<v Speaker 1>media and some of her followers are weirdly angry about it.

0:01:11.247 --> 0:01:14.527
<v Speaker 1>The world's number one show is about healthy relationships and

0:01:14.647 --> 0:01:18.407
<v Speaker 1>loser's siblings. We're unpacking why nobody wants this has become

0:01:18.607 --> 0:01:22.807
<v Speaker 1>the unexpected streaming hit of the year. And don't call

0:01:22.847 --> 0:01:26.047
<v Speaker 1>me baby or mate, the iconic word that people are

0:01:26.087 --> 0:01:29.487
<v Speaker 1>passionately arguing about this week after a retail worker got

0:01:29.527 --> 0:01:32.087
<v Speaker 1>in trouble for using it at work, but.

0:01:32.087 --> 0:01:35.007
<v Speaker 3>First in case he missed it for the first time

0:01:35.087 --> 0:01:38.807
<v Speaker 3>since becoming King Charles will be visiting Australia next week

0:01:39.007 --> 0:01:40.847
<v Speaker 3>and nobody wants to go to his party.

0:01:41.207 --> 0:01:44.647
<v Speaker 4>Okay, King Charles is actually sick and he's coming to Australia.

0:01:44.927 --> 0:01:47.287
<v Speaker 2>It caused his cancer treatment to come to Australia.

0:01:47.527 --> 0:01:51.047
<v Speaker 4>Not like you last week, not like this films was anything.

0:01:51.127 --> 0:01:53.567
<v Speaker 1>It feels rude. Can I just say that last time

0:01:53.607 --> 0:01:55.047
<v Speaker 1>he was in Australia, or it might have been the

0:01:55.047 --> 0:01:57.527
<v Speaker 1>time before, I was invited to go and meet him

0:01:57.767 --> 0:01:58.847
<v Speaker 1>and Camilla.

0:01:58.847 --> 0:02:00.447
<v Speaker 4>And you went, well, ye had nothing else.

0:02:00.647 --> 0:02:02.847
<v Speaker 1>I curred to me to not go. I did go

0:02:03.007 --> 0:02:06.567
<v Speaker 1>for a bit disloyal to Diana in a way meeting Camilla,

0:02:06.647 --> 0:02:08.127
<v Speaker 1>but they were a hoot.

0:02:08.687 --> 0:02:10.647
<v Speaker 3>So I've got all the excuses. So it's all the

0:02:10.687 --> 0:02:13.687
<v Speaker 3>state premiers that aren't going okay to his kind of

0:02:13.807 --> 0:02:18.087
<v Speaker 3>welcoming party in Canberra. So here are the excuses. So

0:02:18.127 --> 0:02:20.767
<v Speaker 3>the Victorian Premier just Into Alan says she's at a

0:02:20.767 --> 0:02:23.727
<v Speaker 3>cabinet meeting that day. New South Wales Premier Chris Minn

0:02:23.727 --> 0:02:25.807
<v Speaker 3>says he's also at a cabinet meeting that day.

0:02:25.807 --> 0:02:27.287
<v Speaker 4>Couldn't be the same cabinet meeting he.

0:02:27.367 --> 0:02:28.367
<v Speaker 2>Meets the same one.

0:02:28.567 --> 0:02:31.607
<v Speaker 3>South Australian Premier Peter Malanowski says he has a regional

0:02:31.687 --> 0:02:32.807
<v Speaker 3>cabinet meeting that day.

0:02:32.887 --> 0:02:34.487
<v Speaker 1>He can't get far off away.

0:02:34.887 --> 0:02:37.887
<v Speaker 3>Queensland Premier Stephen Miles says he's too busy with campaigning

0:02:37.927 --> 0:02:38.607
<v Speaker 3>for the re election.

0:02:38.967 --> 0:02:41.527
<v Speaker 4>Oh that's that sounds like a stretch. That's the weakest

0:02:41.567 --> 0:02:42.647
<v Speaker 4>excuse i've heard thus far.

0:02:43.007 --> 0:02:43.767
<v Speaker 2>I think the best one.

0:02:43.807 --> 0:02:47.287
<v Speaker 3>Tasmanian Premier Jeremy Rockcliffe is on a US trade mission,

0:02:47.367 --> 0:02:48.807
<v Speaker 3>so he's actually busy, all right.

0:02:48.847 --> 0:02:50.807
<v Speaker 2>He's a Western.

0:02:50.527 --> 0:02:54.327
<v Speaker 3>Australia's Premier Roger Cook says he just had other commitments.

0:02:53.847 --> 0:02:57.447
<v Speaker 4>Okay, even he took a leaf out of I think

0:02:57.447 --> 0:02:59.447
<v Speaker 4>it's Zoe Foster Blake who's talked about this. You don't

0:02:59.447 --> 0:03:02.567
<v Speaker 4>give an excuse because Charles might say it's all right,

0:03:02.607 --> 0:03:04.167
<v Speaker 4>I'll go the next day when you don't have your

0:03:04.167 --> 0:03:07.607
<v Speaker 4>cabinet meeting. Yeah, and then and then you're screwed, whereas

0:03:07.647 --> 0:03:11.047
<v Speaker 4>this guy has gone absolutely not. I'm just out for

0:03:11.047 --> 0:03:13.527
<v Speaker 4>the whole week. How about the New South Wales cabinet meeting.

0:03:16.567 --> 0:03:18.127
<v Speaker 1>But that's why I went because I didn't have a

0:03:18.127 --> 0:03:23.007
<v Speaker 1>cabinet meeting obviously. But I'm interested to understand what this means,

0:03:23.407 --> 0:03:26.367
<v Speaker 1>because obviously all of these people could make themselves available,

0:03:26.647 --> 0:03:29.727
<v Speaker 1>but they've chosen not to. Do you think that they

0:03:29.767 --> 0:03:32.167
<v Speaker 1>all checked with each other, that there's a group text

0:03:32.207 --> 0:03:35.007
<v Speaker 1>as a group chat, and they're all like, I'm not going,

0:03:35.007 --> 0:03:36.847
<v Speaker 1>and it's all if you're not going, and I'm not going,

0:03:36.887 --> 0:03:39.487
<v Speaker 1>and it's like, well, if we all make excuses, then

0:03:39.527 --> 0:03:42.407
<v Speaker 1>there's no attention on any one of us fight turning up.

0:03:42.527 --> 0:03:47.127
<v Speaker 4>For example, if Tasmania just went, you'd look very loyalist.

0:03:47.487 --> 0:03:49.687
<v Speaker 4>It would be almost a political statement to be the

0:03:49.727 --> 0:03:53.207
<v Speaker 4>only one going. But I just keep thinking, this is

0:03:53.247 --> 0:03:55.127
<v Speaker 4>a recurring nightmare of mind. This is why I don't

0:03:55.127 --> 0:03:58.087
<v Speaker 4>have birthday parties, because I have this dream that I

0:03:58.167 --> 0:03:59.727
<v Speaker 4>invite all of these people to my house and no

0:03:59.767 --> 0:04:03.047
<v Speaker 4>one shows up, and poor Charles must be because remember

0:04:03.047 --> 0:04:07.047
<v Speaker 4>there's humming with these coronations. He asked all the people

0:04:07.047 --> 0:04:08.447
<v Speaker 4>to perform, and all of them said no.

0:04:08.767 --> 0:04:14.127
<v Speaker 1>Katie pir he said, yes, if you could live inside

0:04:14.167 --> 0:04:16.367
<v Speaker 1>of a cartoon, which one would it be?

0:04:17.007 --> 0:04:18.207
<v Speaker 5>Barbie?

0:04:18.767 --> 0:04:19.167
<v Speaker 6>And why?

0:04:19.767 --> 0:04:23.087
<v Speaker 7>I really like Raquel and it's a good show and

0:04:23.127 --> 0:04:24.287
<v Speaker 7>I watch it every night.

0:04:24.607 --> 0:04:27.807
<v Speaker 1>I will literally be like gues, I'm a barbe Come on.

0:04:28.087 --> 0:04:30.607
<v Speaker 4>Two things happened over the weekend that made me think

0:04:30.687 --> 0:04:34.567
<v Speaker 4>about social media, children's faces, fame, and the choices that

0:04:34.687 --> 0:04:39.047
<v Speaker 4>parents make. The first was Australian business owner Kick founder

0:04:39.127 --> 0:04:42.127
<v Speaker 4>Steph clare Smith, who is mum to three year old Harvey,

0:04:42.767 --> 0:04:45.607
<v Speaker 4>and over the weekend I noticed she uploaded a video

0:04:46.007 --> 0:04:49.207
<v Speaker 4>of a day out with Harvey, but in that video,

0:04:49.567 --> 0:04:51.367
<v Speaker 4>his face was blurred and that was the first time

0:04:51.407 --> 0:04:54.847
<v Speaker 4>I'd seen her blow his face. Reacting to what must

0:04:54.887 --> 0:04:57.727
<v Speaker 4>have been some criticism, she then jumped onto her stories

0:04:57.767 --> 0:05:00.647
<v Speaker 4>and said that along with her husband, they've decided to

0:05:00.727 --> 0:05:04.487
<v Speaker 4>no longer share Harvey's face. He has been recognized on

0:05:04.527 --> 0:05:07.727
<v Speaker 4>the street by people he doesn't know and that's really

0:05:07.887 --> 0:05:11.007
<v Speaker 4>confusing for him. And so from now on she said,

0:05:11.167 --> 0:05:13.927
<v Speaker 4>we won't see him on her Instagram, and she has

0:05:14.007 --> 0:05:16.127
<v Speaker 4>one point five million followers.

0:05:15.767 --> 0:05:17.567
<v Speaker 1>We won't see him at all, or we just won't

0:05:17.567 --> 0:05:18.727
<v Speaker 1>see his actual face.

0:05:18.967 --> 0:05:21.767
<v Speaker 4>We won't see his face, okay, And you know, she said,

0:05:21.767 --> 0:05:23.487
<v Speaker 4>a lot of people are going, oh, well, why even

0:05:23.567 --> 0:05:26.487
<v Speaker 4>upload that? If I scroll back, if I Google, I

0:05:26.527 --> 0:05:28.487
<v Speaker 4>can find pictures of him. So what's the difference. And

0:05:28.567 --> 0:05:30.807
<v Speaker 4>to that, she said, you don't have to understand my

0:05:30.847 --> 0:05:32.927
<v Speaker 4>decision or agree with it. This is what we're doing

0:05:32.967 --> 0:05:35.927
<v Speaker 4>moving forward now. The next thing I saw in my

0:05:35.967 --> 0:05:39.847
<v Speaker 4>Instagram feet over the weekend was reality star and business

0:05:39.847 --> 0:05:44.007
<v Speaker 4>owner Kim Kardashian speaking to Interview magazine beside her eleven

0:05:44.087 --> 0:05:48.407
<v Speaker 4>year old daughter Northwest. Clips from that conversation have since

0:05:48.447 --> 0:05:50.527
<v Speaker 4>gone viral, which you heard at the top of the segment.

0:05:50.967 --> 0:05:54.607
<v Speaker 4>Northwest was speaking about her relationship with God, how much

0:05:54.607 --> 0:05:58.527
<v Speaker 4>she loves Barbie, her complicated relationship with the paparazzi, and

0:05:58.567 --> 0:06:01.807
<v Speaker 4>how she can't wait to start her careers. Mostly she's

0:06:01.967 --> 0:06:04.247
<v Speaker 4>brimming with business idea. She wants to have fashion label

0:06:04.287 --> 0:06:07.527
<v Speaker 4>called Northwest, and the fact that she used careers plural,

0:06:07.607 --> 0:06:11.167
<v Speaker 4>I think says everything about this upcoming generation. These two

0:06:11.207 --> 0:06:15.807
<v Speaker 4>examples felt like such an illustrative snapshot of the tensions

0:06:15.807 --> 0:06:19.007
<v Speaker 4>that currently exist in our culture around sharing images of

0:06:19.087 --> 0:06:22.647
<v Speaker 4>children online and if we do share, how much at

0:06:22.647 --> 0:06:26.967
<v Speaker 4>what age? And can we change our decision? M you

0:06:27.047 --> 0:06:29.767
<v Speaker 4>know social media better than just about anyone. Do you

0:06:29.807 --> 0:06:33.847
<v Speaker 4>have any reaction when you see either someone share images

0:06:33.887 --> 0:06:37.167
<v Speaker 4>of their kids or share images with their faces blurred out?

0:06:37.207 --> 0:06:39.847
<v Speaker 4>Because I've seen that increasingly as well.

0:06:40.047 --> 0:06:41.967
<v Speaker 3>When I first started seeing this happen, because I think

0:06:42.007 --> 0:06:44.327
<v Speaker 3>only now a lot of my friends are having children,

0:06:44.767 --> 0:06:47.527
<v Speaker 3>so there's a lot of kids on my Instagram feeds.

0:06:47.927 --> 0:06:50.087
<v Speaker 3>Didn't ask for them to be. Yeah, I don't follow them.

0:06:50.087 --> 0:06:54.807
<v Speaker 3>I follow my friends follow Get out of my face.

0:06:55.047 --> 0:06:56.567
<v Speaker 1>Nobody wants this, he said.

0:06:57.247 --> 0:07:00.447
<v Speaker 3>But what I've noticed is that you know how Instagram

0:07:00.487 --> 0:07:03.127
<v Speaker 3>has like a close friends options when you do your

0:07:03.167 --> 0:07:06.447
<v Speaker 3>Instagram stories, I've noticed that a lot of them will

0:07:06.447 --> 0:07:09.647
<v Speaker 3>blur their kids' face on their main stories or their feed,

0:07:09.847 --> 0:07:12.287
<v Speaker 3>but have the normal photo without the blur on their

0:07:12.287 --> 0:07:15.207
<v Speaker 3>close friends stories. And I don't know how to ask

0:07:15.647 --> 0:07:18.727
<v Speaker 3>why am I allowed to see your child? And who's

0:07:18.767 --> 0:07:19.847
<v Speaker 3>not allowed to see your child?

0:07:19.887 --> 0:07:19.967
<v Speaker 4>Like?

0:07:20.127 --> 0:07:21.167
<v Speaker 2>Who doesn't make it?

0:07:21.207 --> 0:07:21.327
<v Speaker 4>So?

0:07:21.367 --> 0:07:23.287
<v Speaker 1>These aren't famous people to be clear.

0:07:23.167 --> 0:07:25.487
<v Speaker 2>No, these are like my friends who aren't famous.

0:07:25.567 --> 0:07:28.367
<v Speaker 4>I've got people who are influencers who I say do

0:07:28.447 --> 0:07:31.287
<v Speaker 4>the same thing. I wonder that too.

0:07:31.527 --> 0:07:32.367
<v Speaker 2>I go, who are you?

0:07:32.967 --> 0:07:35.207
<v Speaker 4>Who is? And I get it, like maybe they know

0:07:35.247 --> 0:07:37.207
<v Speaker 4>that they've got certain journalists or they've got I mean

0:07:37.207 --> 0:07:38.167
<v Speaker 4>home a journalists.

0:07:38.407 --> 0:07:41.687
<v Speaker 1>But oh no, I completely understand that that's about having control,

0:07:41.727 --> 0:07:44.847
<v Speaker 1>because anyone can follow you if you're not private, anyone

0:07:44.847 --> 0:07:47.047
<v Speaker 1>can follow you on social media, and particularly if you

0:07:47.127 --> 0:07:50.807
<v Speaker 1>need to have a public account for your job, particularly

0:07:50.847 --> 0:07:52.727
<v Speaker 1>if you're an influencer, but if you're any person in

0:07:52.727 --> 0:07:55.807
<v Speaker 1>the public eye. Everybody kind of needs to promote their

0:07:55.847 --> 0:07:59.767
<v Speaker 1>business these days, no matter what it is, so there

0:07:59.927 --> 0:08:02.327
<v Speaker 1>will always be people following you who you don't know,

0:08:03.007 --> 0:08:06.247
<v Speaker 1>whereas with close friends, you can literally choose maybe that's

0:08:06.287 --> 0:08:08.927
<v Speaker 1>only four people, or maybe that's forty people, but they're

0:08:08.927 --> 0:08:10.567
<v Speaker 1>all people who you actually know.

0:08:10.967 --> 0:08:13.967
<v Speaker 3>But what I want to know is also, if you're

0:08:13.967 --> 0:08:16.887
<v Speaker 3>going to blur your kid's face, why post the photo

0:08:17.207 --> 0:08:19.567
<v Speaker 3>in the first place. I think it ruins a really

0:08:19.607 --> 0:08:20.207
<v Speaker 3>good photo.

0:08:20.487 --> 0:08:23.047
<v Speaker 4>I have heard a few of my friends get snarky

0:08:23.087 --> 0:08:25.447
<v Speaker 4>about this because they say, just don't share it. It's fine.

0:08:25.807 --> 0:08:29.887
<v Speaker 4>I will defend people uploading pictures with a blurred face,

0:08:29.967 --> 0:08:33.007
<v Speaker 4>because if you want to share scenes from your life,

0:08:33.447 --> 0:08:36.367
<v Speaker 4>and if you're a content creator, if you've got to

0:08:36.407 --> 0:08:40.367
<v Speaker 4>feed that beast, then I totally get how you want

0:08:40.367 --> 0:08:43.687
<v Speaker 4>to share parts of you and what you're doing. Your

0:08:43.767 --> 0:08:47.447
<v Speaker 4>child is inevitably probably in some of those images, and

0:08:47.527 --> 0:08:49.927
<v Speaker 4>so blurring their face means you can still share it

0:08:49.967 --> 0:08:53.567
<v Speaker 4>but not reveal their identity. And I think this is

0:08:53.607 --> 0:08:54.607
<v Speaker 4>something I'm grappling with.

0:08:54.687 --> 0:08:57.887
<v Speaker 1>So you're saying that you can this is going to

0:08:57.927 --> 0:09:00.527
<v Speaker 1>sound wrong perform your identity as a parent, and I

0:09:00.567 --> 0:09:03.887
<v Speaker 1>don't mean perform has been faking, but like sharing your

0:09:03.887 --> 0:09:08.727
<v Speaker 1>identity as a parent without sharing your child's actual identity exactly.

0:09:08.807 --> 0:09:10.967
<v Speaker 4>And if you're a parent, then that is what your

0:09:11.007 --> 0:09:12.567
<v Speaker 4>weekends look like. Like what are you meant to do?

0:09:12.607 --> 0:09:13.487
<v Speaker 4>Kick them out of the photo?

0:09:13.687 --> 0:09:16.687
<v Speaker 3>I was going to say, like do one photo for

0:09:16.727 --> 0:09:19.887
<v Speaker 3>the family and then one I'm without the kids, so

0:09:19.927 --> 0:09:22.127
<v Speaker 3>it's like you're just like in an empty high chair,

0:09:22.167 --> 0:09:23.087
<v Speaker 3>like feeding nothing.

0:09:23.407 --> 0:09:27.767
<v Speaker 4>I totally get it, because my tension around this has

0:09:27.847 --> 0:09:31.807
<v Speaker 4>been how do we protect the images of children who

0:09:31.887 --> 0:09:36.647
<v Speaker 4>can't consent to having their image shared while also having

0:09:36.767 --> 0:09:41.407
<v Speaker 4>important conversations about parenting and motherhood and not erasing the

0:09:41.527 --> 0:09:45.287
<v Speaker 4>experience of parenting from the public domain, Like, how do

0:09:45.407 --> 0:09:49.407
<v Speaker 4>you have conversations about that without children?

0:09:49.527 --> 0:09:52.007
<v Speaker 1>Well, maybe it's by blurring faces. I mean, it's interesting.

0:09:52.327 --> 0:09:56.207
<v Speaker 1>I'm now going through it again with Lunar, my granddaughter,

0:09:56.367 --> 0:09:59.567
<v Speaker 1>your child, and I'm really confirmed. Well, I'm actually not

0:09:59.607 --> 0:10:01.247
<v Speaker 1>conflicted about it. I'm just not going to do it.

0:10:01.287 --> 0:10:02.647
<v Speaker 1>I just haven't done it. At first.

0:10:02.727 --> 0:10:02.927
<v Speaker 4>I had.

0:10:03.007 --> 0:10:04.567
<v Speaker 1>I didn't do it because I didn't feel that it

0:10:04.607 --> 0:10:06.647
<v Speaker 1>was my right to do it, because it's up to

0:10:06.687 --> 0:10:10.847
<v Speaker 1>you and Luca. Now I I feel very clearly that

0:10:10.927 --> 0:10:13.167
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to do it for the same reason

0:10:13.247 --> 0:10:15.127
<v Speaker 1>that I don't do it for my own children and

0:10:15.167 --> 0:10:18.527
<v Speaker 1>never have. Because I have a lot of people who

0:10:18.527 --> 0:10:20.967
<v Speaker 1>are following me, and not all of those people like me.

0:10:21.087 --> 0:10:23.567
<v Speaker 1>Some of those people hate follow me, and I would

0:10:23.727 --> 0:10:27.847
<v Speaker 1>never want to put anyone that I love in that situation.

0:10:27.967 --> 0:10:32.047
<v Speaker 1>And also, my children don't want to be public people.

0:10:32.207 --> 0:10:36.327
<v Speaker 1>Northwest clearly does, Sunday Rose clearly does. So she's on

0:10:36.367 --> 0:10:40.247
<v Speaker 1>a catwalk. Although Nicole and Keith have almost never shared

0:10:40.927 --> 0:10:43.927
<v Speaker 1>photos of their children, it's interesting now she's sixteen, she

0:10:44.007 --> 0:10:46.967
<v Speaker 1>could consent and I know that's not social media that's

0:10:47.007 --> 0:10:50.127
<v Speaker 1>being in the public eye. The question is what are

0:10:50.167 --> 0:10:54.367
<v Speaker 1>children consenting to and are they capable of making those

0:10:54.447 --> 0:10:56.567
<v Speaker 1>kinds of decisions?

0:10:56.887 --> 0:11:00.087
<v Speaker 4>And I suppose too, what are parent's consenting to? Right

0:11:00.127 --> 0:11:04.007
<v Speaker 4>because we don't know. It's an ever changing beast that

0:11:04.047 --> 0:11:07.287
<v Speaker 4>we don't fully understand. And what I really respect about

0:11:07.527 --> 0:11:10.127
<v Speaker 4>Steph klas Smith I defect and her right to change

0:11:10.127 --> 0:11:12.887
<v Speaker 4>her mind about So I think that that's a one

0:11:13.007 --> 0:11:14.927
<v Speaker 4>year old is different to a three year old, is

0:11:14.927 --> 0:11:18.407
<v Speaker 4>different to a thirteen year old, and we're all at

0:11:18.567 --> 0:11:21.207
<v Speaker 4>different stages. And I think that's the thing with parenting too,

0:11:21.287 --> 0:11:25.127
<v Speaker 4>is that everyone has different values or hierarchy of values

0:11:25.167 --> 0:11:27.607
<v Speaker 4>when it comes to parenting, and no judgment about what

0:11:27.647 --> 0:11:30.647
<v Speaker 4>they are. Like my child is probably eating a lunch

0:11:30.727 --> 0:11:34.967
<v Speaker 4>right now. That would horrify some listeners because the nutritional

0:11:35.287 --> 0:11:37.607
<v Speaker 4>makeup of her lunch isn't my number one priority, right,

0:11:38.247 --> 0:11:41.967
<v Speaker 4>But for other people, like if Steph Klasmith did want

0:11:42.007 --> 0:11:45.927
<v Speaker 4>to share her child's face, like that's just how she's

0:11:46.167 --> 0:11:49.327
<v Speaker 4>choosing to parent. And because it's so public, I think

0:11:49.327 --> 0:11:52.007
<v Speaker 4>everyone then feels like they get to have an opinion

0:11:52.167 --> 0:11:52.487
<v Speaker 4>about it.

0:11:52.487 --> 0:11:54.487
<v Speaker 1>As we're all figuring it out. But the other thing

0:11:54.567 --> 0:11:57.527
<v Speaker 1>is what she said, which is so relevant and I

0:11:57.567 --> 0:11:59.967
<v Speaker 1>hadn't really thought about it before, is that it's a

0:12:00.007 --> 0:12:02.447
<v Speaker 1>safety issue for these children. You have to teach your

0:12:02.487 --> 0:12:04.527
<v Speaker 1>children about stranger danger and who you speak to in

0:12:04.527 --> 0:12:06.887
<v Speaker 1>public and who's a safe person and who's not. If

0:12:06.887 --> 0:12:10.967
<v Speaker 1>someone suddenly knows your name, recognize as you calls out

0:12:10.967 --> 0:12:13.167
<v Speaker 1>to you in the street. You're always with a three

0:12:13.247 --> 0:12:15.767
<v Speaker 1>year old, but what if you're not, Yeah, when they're

0:12:15.767 --> 0:12:18.327
<v Speaker 1>a little bit older and they're waiting outside the schoolgate

0:12:18.327 --> 0:12:21.007
<v Speaker 1>and someone's like, hey, Harvey, your mum told me to

0:12:21.007 --> 0:12:23.407
<v Speaker 1>come and pick you up, or even just hey Harvey,

0:12:23.407 --> 0:12:26.127
<v Speaker 1>can I have a selfie? And you're not there to

0:12:26.207 --> 0:12:26.807
<v Speaker 1>protect to.

0:12:26.807 --> 0:12:30.687
<v Speaker 4>Have Yeah, And how are you to anticipate that before

0:12:30.727 --> 0:12:34.007
<v Speaker 4>it happens. That's something that I've recognized, right, Like I

0:12:34.127 --> 0:12:36.167
<v Speaker 4>might have told this on the podcast before, but I

0:12:36.327 --> 0:12:39.687
<v Speaker 4>was sharing images of Luna in particularly the first few

0:12:39.807 --> 0:12:41.967
<v Speaker 4>months of her life. She is my entire world, so

0:12:42.007 --> 0:12:45.367
<v Speaker 4>it feels like what else would I share? And a

0:12:45.407 --> 0:12:48.967
<v Speaker 4>few comments popped up about I'd spoken on the podcast

0:12:49.007 --> 0:12:51.447
<v Speaker 4>about her she was slow to gain weight, and a

0:12:51.447 --> 0:12:55.327
<v Speaker 4>few really critical comments popped up about Luna and about

0:12:55.327 --> 0:13:00.487
<v Speaker 4>how she looked. And I read those and had this

0:13:00.847 --> 0:13:04.647
<v Speaker 4>fierce protective instinct of say what you want about me,

0:13:04.767 --> 0:13:08.327
<v Speaker 4>but you don't get to say that about my daughter.

0:13:08.407 --> 0:13:13.847
<v Speaker 4>Like I was so so horrified by that, and I

0:13:13.927 --> 0:13:16.287
<v Speaker 4>never would have thought that that would happen, like, which

0:13:16.327 --> 0:13:18.407
<v Speaker 4>sounds so silly because you go, well, of course people

0:13:18.407 --> 0:13:19.967
<v Speaker 4>are going to be critical. If people hate you, they'll

0:13:20.007 --> 0:13:22.327
<v Speaker 4>hurt your kid, but of a baby, But of a baby.

0:13:22.407 --> 0:13:24.607
<v Speaker 4>It's like I had to have that experience to go

0:13:25.087 --> 0:13:27.967
<v Speaker 4>all right, I am going to be forever navigating my

0:13:28.047 --> 0:13:30.567
<v Speaker 4>relationship between how much I share about me and my

0:13:30.927 --> 0:13:32.167
<v Speaker 4>child and all of it.

0:13:32.447 --> 0:13:35.567
<v Speaker 3>If Luna becomes more recognizable when she gets older, because

0:13:35.647 --> 0:13:37.207
<v Speaker 3>right now, for me, like all babies can't look the

0:13:37.207 --> 0:13:37.487
<v Speaker 3>same way.

0:13:37.527 --> 0:13:38.047
<v Speaker 2>I understand.

0:13:38.087 --> 0:13:38.607
<v Speaker 4>I agree with you.

0:13:38.767 --> 0:13:41.527
<v Speaker 3>I understand the change like showing your baby and then

0:13:41.567 --> 0:13:43.847
<v Speaker 3>it becomes recognizable. So then you stop, do you reckon

0:13:43.927 --> 0:13:44.687
<v Speaker 3>or stop showing her.

0:13:44.887 --> 0:13:48.847
<v Speaker 4>We've talked before about leaking intimacy and having moments. You know,

0:13:49.207 --> 0:13:52.047
<v Speaker 4>my phone is just photos and videos of Luna that

0:13:52.087 --> 0:13:53.647
<v Speaker 4>are being sent to family all the time.

0:13:53.487 --> 0:13:57.087
<v Speaker 1>And we're content creators. Yeah, so it's it's challenging, right

0:13:57.127 --> 0:13:59.247
<v Speaker 1>because you're like, this is a funny story, this is

0:13:59.287 --> 0:14:02.167
<v Speaker 1>a cute video. We all try to show up on

0:14:02.327 --> 0:14:06.007
<v Speaker 1>social in an authentic way. And it often strikes me

0:14:06.247 --> 0:14:08.927
<v Speaker 1>that my children and now Luna are my whole world,

0:14:09.007 --> 0:14:11.807
<v Speaker 1>and I don't put any of them on social at all.

0:14:11.847 --> 0:14:14.487
<v Speaker 1>But we're sort of talking about the downside of it.

0:14:14.567 --> 0:14:18.007
<v Speaker 1>The other side of it is just that when you're

0:14:18.327 --> 0:14:20.607
<v Speaker 1>on social media, whether you have a big following or

0:14:20.647 --> 0:14:24.687
<v Speaker 1>whether you don't, people do have a parasocial relationship with you, right,

0:14:24.847 --> 0:14:27.967
<v Speaker 1>And that is a weird thing to come to terms

0:14:28.007 --> 0:14:30.087
<v Speaker 1>with and to process. And we're all still doing it

0:14:30.167 --> 0:14:32.647
<v Speaker 1>like that. People feel that they know us because they

0:14:32.647 --> 0:14:34.167
<v Speaker 1>do know us, because we put a lot of ourselves

0:14:34.207 --> 0:14:37.167
<v Speaker 1>out there, whether it's on this show or on our socials.

0:14:37.767 --> 0:14:40.887
<v Speaker 1>But that is a very big burden to give a child,

0:14:41.007 --> 0:14:42.967
<v Speaker 1>because the person who wants a selfie might not be

0:14:43.007 --> 0:14:46.167
<v Speaker 1>a kidnapper. They might just want a selfie. But that's weird,

0:14:46.847 --> 0:14:51.247
<v Speaker 1>Like it's not a decision that they ever made out,

0:14:51.527 --> 0:14:52.727
<v Speaker 1>it's just a bit of a head scrap.

0:14:52.807 --> 0:14:54.967
<v Speaker 4>I suppose is that if you are a public figure,

0:14:55.287 --> 0:14:57.847
<v Speaker 4>then there's an element of that happening anyway. Right, you're

0:14:57.887 --> 0:15:00.767
<v Speaker 4>walking down the street and people go, oh, my goodness,

0:15:01.087 --> 0:15:04.847
<v Speaker 4>Hamish Blake, and if you're with your kids, then suddenly

0:15:04.887 --> 0:15:08.407
<v Speaker 4>they're thrust into the spotlight. And we know Northwest is

0:15:08.447 --> 0:15:11.807
<v Speaker 4>talking about being happed, like these children are also being

0:15:11.847 --> 0:15:16.127
<v Speaker 4>photographed without their permission. For the lacks of Northwest. I

0:15:16.207 --> 0:15:18.887
<v Speaker 4>was thinking, yeah, she was in Vogue at one, but

0:15:18.967 --> 0:15:21.807
<v Speaker 4>also her life has been the stuff of a reality

0:15:21.847 --> 0:15:25.167
<v Speaker 4>television show since she was born, so she's of course yeah.

0:15:25.207 --> 0:15:27.767
<v Speaker 1>And it was really interesting to watch that video and

0:15:27.847 --> 0:15:30.007
<v Speaker 1>read that interview. And she's on the cover of this

0:15:30.087 --> 0:15:32.287
<v Speaker 1>magazine and she's eleven, right, and one of the quotes

0:15:32.367 --> 0:15:34.127
<v Speaker 1>or one of the you know, it was her mother

0:15:34.207 --> 0:15:37.367
<v Speaker 1>doing the interview. But I felt very this sounds like

0:15:37.407 --> 0:15:40.527
<v Speaker 1>concern trolling. But the stuff you say at eleven, I

0:15:40.567 --> 0:15:42.647
<v Speaker 1>don't know if you want that immortalized. Like she says

0:15:42.647 --> 0:15:45.887
<v Speaker 1>some pretty full on stuff about God and about the

0:15:45.927 --> 0:15:49.567
<v Speaker 1>devil and her siblings, and you know, even some of

0:15:49.567 --> 0:15:51.927
<v Speaker 1>the more innocuous stuff. Kim says to her, what do

0:15:51.967 --> 0:15:54.567
<v Speaker 1>you want to be when you grow up? And north says,

0:15:54.607 --> 0:15:56.287
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, because I already do a lot of

0:15:56.327 --> 0:15:58.007
<v Speaker 1>stuff that I want to be when I grow up.

0:15:58.087 --> 0:16:00.847
<v Speaker 1>I just want to pursue my careers now, and then

0:16:01.007 --> 0:16:04.247
<v Speaker 1>Kim says, that's amazing that you know so young. What

0:16:04.287 --> 0:16:07.367
<v Speaker 1>would be your fake name? This is the family business.

0:16:07.407 --> 0:16:11.807
<v Speaker 1>The family business is reality TV, it's selling product, it's

0:16:12.407 --> 0:16:16.087
<v Speaker 1>having all these kinds of opportunities because of your name.

0:16:16.487 --> 0:16:20.167
<v Speaker 1>And she sees her whole family work really hard as well,

0:16:20.807 --> 0:16:24.127
<v Speaker 1>but they exist in front of the camera. She's never

0:16:24.167 --> 0:16:25.807
<v Speaker 1>known anything else, and so does her father.

0:16:27.167 --> 0:16:28.047
<v Speaker 2>I saw as well.

0:16:28.247 --> 0:16:31.847
<v Speaker 4>Just recently, Saint, who's the I think next youngest maybe

0:16:32.007 --> 0:16:35.247
<v Speaker 4>got a YouTube account and Kim Kardashin had Saint sign

0:16:35.287 --> 0:16:38.007
<v Speaker 4>a contract that she shared, you know, all the accounts,

0:16:38.007 --> 0:16:41.407
<v Speaker 4>even Kim and North. The TikTok account is definitely overseen

0:16:41.447 --> 0:16:44.767
<v Speaker 4>by an adult, you can tell. And it's pretty harmless stuff.

0:16:45.607 --> 0:16:49.127
<v Speaker 4>But when you're a parent, I think that you assume

0:16:49.247 --> 0:16:51.767
<v Speaker 4>that everyone will love your child as much as you

0:16:51.807 --> 0:16:54.767
<v Speaker 4>do because you see something very different to what the

0:16:54.807 --> 0:16:57.007
<v Speaker 4>rest of the world sees. So when I was sharing

0:16:57.047 --> 0:16:59.727
<v Speaker 4>those images of Luna, I was like, can you even believe.

0:16:59.927 --> 0:17:02.287
<v Speaker 1>I have had the most breathtaking childs? And there people

0:17:02.327 --> 0:17:03.807
<v Speaker 1>like she looks like a potato.

0:17:03.527 --> 0:17:05.887
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, And I feel like this is the whole universe

0:17:05.927 --> 0:17:08.047
<v Speaker 4>in an image. Can you believe anything has ever been

0:17:08.087 --> 0:17:10.927
<v Speaker 4>this cute? And the thing about the world is that

0:17:10.967 --> 0:17:13.887
<v Speaker 4>they are simply not looking at the same photograph. And

0:17:14.007 --> 0:17:17.207
<v Speaker 4>so even Northwest I've seen. Do you remember recently the

0:17:17.247 --> 0:17:30.327
<v Speaker 4>Lion King the she performed in the Music Hall and

0:17:30.327 --> 0:17:32.807
<v Speaker 4>there was a Lion King clip and then that went

0:17:33.007 --> 0:17:34.967
<v Speaker 4>viral because a lot of people went, well, I think

0:17:35.007 --> 0:17:37.007
<v Speaker 4>that it's nepotism that she got this role and it

0:17:37.047 --> 0:17:39.167
<v Speaker 4>was a terrible performance, and listened to her voice.

0:17:39.207 --> 0:17:42.047
<v Speaker 1>I felt the same way about Sunday Rose Kidman Urban

0:17:42.327 --> 0:17:46.567
<v Speaker 1>who opened the show for Meumu. Now, she's a girl

0:17:46.607 --> 0:17:48.927
<v Speaker 1>who was always the minute she was on a red carpet,

0:17:48.967 --> 0:17:51.247
<v Speaker 1>and I noticed that Nicole had heard two daughters when

0:17:51.287 --> 0:17:56.207
<v Speaker 1>she was inducted into a Hall of Fame for something recently,

0:17:56.367 --> 0:17:58.167
<v Speaker 1>she had her two daughters on the red carpet with

0:17:58.207 --> 0:18:00.047
<v Speaker 1>her for the first time, along with her sister and

0:18:00.087 --> 0:18:02.207
<v Speaker 1>her niece. I was like, Oh, those girls are going

0:18:02.287 --> 0:18:04.567
<v Speaker 1>to be models in a hot second, because they're tall,

0:18:04.727 --> 0:18:07.767
<v Speaker 1>they're beautiful, they're like all of those things. But to

0:18:07.887 --> 0:18:11.127
<v Speaker 1>open a Mewmu show, that is a big friggin deal.

0:18:11.327 --> 0:18:14.487
<v Speaker 1>And I get that she's sixteen. What an amazing opportunity,

0:18:15.287 --> 0:18:19.527
<v Speaker 1>but she got absolutely slammed because that's what the internet is, right, Like,

0:18:19.567 --> 0:18:20.847
<v Speaker 1>there are going to be people who are going to

0:18:20.887 --> 0:18:22.647
<v Speaker 1>be lovely, but most of the people who are going

0:18:22.687 --> 0:18:26.527
<v Speaker 1>to comment are going to say horrible things. Oh that's

0:18:26.567 --> 0:18:28.647
<v Speaker 1>a big thing to expose your child too. So as

0:18:28.687 --> 0:18:31.607
<v Speaker 1>a parent, how do you balance that between here's this

0:18:31.687 --> 0:18:34.847
<v Speaker 1>amazing opportunity, Yeah, what am I exposing them to?

0:18:34.887 --> 0:18:36.807
<v Speaker 3>Because it has to come out one way, right, So

0:18:36.927 --> 0:18:38.607
<v Speaker 3>is it better to come out as an eleven year

0:18:38.607 --> 0:18:40.647
<v Speaker 3>old or as a sixteen year old? Like even with

0:18:40.687 --> 0:18:44.527
<v Speaker 3>the Northwest stuff. I was watching that interview, and everything

0:18:44.527 --> 0:18:47.247
<v Speaker 3>she says, in my eyes, seemed fine for an eleven

0:18:47.327 --> 0:18:49.927
<v Speaker 3>year old to say, because all eleven year olds are notissist, Like,

0:18:49.927 --> 0:18:50.687
<v Speaker 3>that's something.

0:18:50.487 --> 0:18:53.207
<v Speaker 2>I would have said. I would have said the exact

0:18:53.207 --> 0:18:53.527
<v Speaker 2>same thing.

0:18:53.567 --> 0:18:55.647
<v Speaker 3>I can't wait to do my careers, except my mom

0:18:55.687 --> 0:18:58.327
<v Speaker 3>would have been like, that's my sweetie. We is like

0:18:58.367 --> 0:19:01.127
<v Speaker 3>tell me more like she's like indulging that behavior.

0:19:01.207 --> 0:19:02.047
<v Speaker 4>It's trademarket.

0:19:02.207 --> 0:19:05.447
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, And I think that's the biggest difference, where they've

0:19:05.447 --> 0:19:08.287
<v Speaker 3>been sheltered and then suddenly they want to do something

0:19:08.767 --> 0:19:11.127
<v Speaker 3>and the parent has to decide should I do it

0:19:11.167 --> 0:19:12.887
<v Speaker 3>now or should I wait a bit later, Like when

0:19:12.927 --> 0:19:14.807
<v Speaker 3>will be the strongest point in their life that they

0:19:14.807 --> 0:19:16.647
<v Speaker 3>can have this feedback come back.

0:19:16.687 --> 0:19:19.207
<v Speaker 4>And let's not pretend that we're not marinating in a

0:19:19.207 --> 0:19:24.207
<v Speaker 4>culture where having a public presence isn't something most people want,

0:19:24.247 --> 0:19:26.527
<v Speaker 4>even at eleven, like the thing about Northwest, even watching

0:19:26.527 --> 0:19:28.927
<v Speaker 4>that Northwest wants to be on camera. And I've heard

0:19:28.927 --> 0:19:31.687
<v Speaker 4>a lot of people say this about content creators going.

0:19:31.927 --> 0:19:34.687
<v Speaker 4>My five year old loves it, like we have all

0:19:34.727 --> 0:19:37.327
<v Speaker 4>this time together. And I know that it can to

0:19:37.367 --> 0:19:41.087
<v Speaker 4>some people it might look a bit dangerous, but there

0:19:41.127 --> 0:19:44.767
<v Speaker 4>are very few jobs that allow parent to spend time

0:19:45.127 --> 0:19:49.007
<v Speaker 4>with their child while also making money to make homemaking

0:19:49.287 --> 0:19:52.487
<v Speaker 4>or like what's happening inside the house monetized.

0:19:52.967 --> 0:19:56.367
<v Speaker 1>What's tricky is I came up in the Internet at

0:19:56.407 --> 0:19:58.487
<v Speaker 1>the time of mummy bloggers that and it was an

0:19:58.487 --> 0:20:01.967
<v Speaker 1>amazing time. And it was the first time that women's

0:20:02.567 --> 0:20:07.327
<v Speaker 1>roles as parents were visible, and that was a beautiful

0:20:07.327 --> 0:20:09.967
<v Speaker 1>thing and it helped so many people will feel seen

0:20:10.047 --> 0:20:14.007
<v Speaker 1>and also the people express themselves. But the toll on

0:20:14.087 --> 0:20:18.647
<v Speaker 1>those children when the Internet flipped and needed you to

0:20:18.647 --> 0:20:22.727
<v Speaker 1>make money, make branded content, you know, Heather Armstrong was

0:20:22.807 --> 0:20:26.087
<v Speaker 1>very famously probably the og mummy blogger, and she had

0:20:26.087 --> 0:20:28.447
<v Speaker 1>a blog called Douce and she used to write so

0:20:28.767 --> 0:20:31.607
<v Speaker 1>incredibly about her children and parenting and she was such

0:20:31.607 --> 0:20:33.807
<v Speaker 1>a funny writer. But then when she had to do

0:20:33.887 --> 0:20:37.887
<v Speaker 1>branded content, she was like, my kids hate having to

0:20:38.127 --> 0:20:40.847
<v Speaker 1>do this and perform and talk about this brand or

0:20:40.847 --> 0:20:44.127
<v Speaker 1>go in this car or and she was really torn

0:20:44.127 --> 0:20:47.007
<v Speaker 1>and she had to give it up because they just

0:20:47.047 --> 0:20:49.047
<v Speaker 1>didn't want to do it. And I was listening to

0:20:49.127 --> 0:20:52.887
<v Speaker 1>a podcast interview with a YouTube family creator who made

0:20:52.887 --> 0:20:55.527
<v Speaker 1>the same decision. But it's hard to walk away from

0:20:55.567 --> 0:20:58.447
<v Speaker 1>all of that money. And the money is also you know,

0:20:58.487 --> 0:21:01.167
<v Speaker 1>it was going to pay for their college and becomes

0:21:01.327 --> 0:21:02.647
<v Speaker 1>a way to support the family.

0:21:02.727 --> 0:21:04.767
<v Speaker 4>Your life, your work can be a lot more flexible,

0:21:04.807 --> 0:21:06.767
<v Speaker 4>You get to spend more time with the people you

0:21:06.807 --> 0:21:07.687
<v Speaker 4>want to spend more time with.

0:21:07.847 --> 0:21:12.367
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so those decisions come even harder when money is involved.

0:21:12.367 --> 0:21:14.487
<v Speaker 1>And you might feel one way that I don't want

0:21:14.527 --> 0:21:18.087
<v Speaker 1>to show my child's face, but then you get this opportunity, well,

0:21:18.287 --> 0:21:21.327
<v Speaker 1>we're going to pay you ten thousand dollars if you

0:21:21.407 --> 0:21:23.927
<v Speaker 1>do this thing for this brand with your child in it.

0:21:24.367 --> 0:21:26.127
<v Speaker 1>And then you say well, that ten thousand.

0:21:25.887 --> 0:21:28.527
<v Speaker 4>Dollars could means I work one less daal Ware.

0:21:28.767 --> 0:21:31.887
<v Speaker 1>Exactly, and I can be with my child more or Yeah,

0:21:31.887 --> 0:21:34.607
<v Speaker 1>the opportunities that it brings you. So there's no easy answer.

0:21:34.767 --> 0:21:36.647
<v Speaker 1>I think what I love about Steph klas Smith is

0:21:36.687 --> 0:21:37.807
<v Speaker 1>that she's figuring it out.

0:21:37.887 --> 0:21:41.047
<v Speaker 4>And I also resent that in this whole conversation the

0:21:41.367 --> 0:21:44.327
<v Speaker 4>people we ever talk about are mother's. I have never

0:21:44.487 --> 0:21:47.607
<v Speaker 4>heard or even seen a comment about a father. Sharing

0:21:47.607 --> 0:21:51.127
<v Speaker 4>a picture of the child is just applause that you're

0:21:51.167 --> 0:21:54.047
<v Speaker 4>spending good time with them. Out Louders let us know

0:21:54.247 --> 0:21:56.407
<v Speaker 4>what you think. You can jump into the out Loud

0:21:56.647 --> 0:21:59.087
<v Speaker 4>Facebook group. You can send us a voice note and

0:21:59.167 --> 0:22:01.847
<v Speaker 4>send it to out loud at mummeat dot com dot au.

0:22:01.967 --> 0:22:04.207
<v Speaker 4>We always love your feedback and if you want to

0:22:04.247 --> 0:22:06.847
<v Speaker 4>hear more from Steph Klaire Smith, there is a brilliant

0:22:06.927 --> 0:22:10.047
<v Speaker 4>episode of but Are You Happy? You can listen to

0:22:10.087 --> 0:22:12.087
<v Speaker 4>that by clicking on the link in the show notes.

0:22:23.687 --> 0:22:24.447
<v Speaker 6>You should be.

0:22:25.727 --> 0:22:26.567
<v Speaker 4>Diating hot Rabbi.

0:22:26.927 --> 0:22:28.607
<v Speaker 1>We definitely are a week.

0:22:28.687 --> 0:22:33.567
<v Speaker 4>I just heard him introduce you as his friend.

0:22:34.327 --> 0:22:36.247
<v Speaker 8>You're going to turn your whole left wepsode down fantastic.

0:22:36.727 --> 0:22:38.567
<v Speaker 8>You're never going to end that with my son.

0:22:40.047 --> 0:22:42.647
<v Speaker 1>On the weekend, it was announced that the Netflix rom

0:22:42.727 --> 0:22:45.367
<v Speaker 1>com Nobody Wants This is going to have a second

0:22:45.447 --> 0:22:48.127
<v Speaker 1>season after the first season has been the number one

0:22:48.207 --> 0:22:50.927
<v Speaker 1>show in the streaming world for the last couple of weeks.

0:22:51.367 --> 0:22:54.447
<v Speaker 1>It stars Adam Brody who was I Didn't watch the

0:22:54.447 --> 0:22:58.047
<v Speaker 1>Open and Seth Cohen. He plays Noah, a cool La

0:22:58.167 --> 0:23:01.047
<v Speaker 1>rabbi who falls in love with an agnostic podcast host

0:23:01.247 --> 0:23:03.607
<v Speaker 1>called Joanne played by Kristen Bell.

0:23:05.567 --> 0:23:07.207
<v Speaker 2>Is a millennial's wet dream.

0:23:07.727 --> 0:23:10.567
<v Speaker 1>Joanne isn't Jewish, but the show is about how love

0:23:10.607 --> 0:23:13.607
<v Speaker 1>conquers all, or maybe it doesn't. It was created by

0:23:13.647 --> 0:23:17.967
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Foster, who, like Joanne, hosts a podcast with her

0:23:18.007 --> 0:23:21.847
<v Speaker 1>sister and married a Jewish guy despite not being Jewish herself.

0:23:21.887 --> 0:23:24.847
<v Speaker 1>And there are two big themes in the show that

0:23:25.047 --> 0:23:28.847
<v Speaker 1>we think has contributed to its breakthrough global success, and

0:23:28.887 --> 0:23:31.767
<v Speaker 1>we wanted to unpack them today. Will there be spoilers?

0:23:32.407 --> 0:23:35.047
<v Speaker 1>Not really, This isn't really about the show.

0:23:34.847 --> 0:23:37.407
<v Speaker 4>Itself, because I will speak from the perspective I've got

0:23:37.407 --> 0:23:39.847
<v Speaker 4>two episodes to go, and so I will not have

0:23:39.927 --> 0:23:42.527
<v Speaker 4>it spoiled. I still don't know, will they won't they?

0:23:42.807 --> 0:23:45.007
<v Speaker 4>I don't have the answer yet, so you know, no

0:23:45.087 --> 0:23:46.487
<v Speaker 4>spoilers from you to a challenge.

0:23:46.607 --> 0:23:52.327
<v Speaker 1>Okay, not really because anyway, I won't spoil it. The

0:23:52.447 --> 0:23:55.807
<v Speaker 1>first theme of this show, why people are saying that

0:23:55.847 --> 0:24:00.047
<v Speaker 1>it's really cut through, is that it depicts the idea

0:24:00.087 --> 0:24:04.047
<v Speaker 1>of healthy relationships, or more importantly, it flips the script

0:24:04.087 --> 0:24:06.207
<v Speaker 1>on the usual girl chasers guy who doesn't want to

0:24:06.207 --> 0:24:11.327
<v Speaker 1>commit stereotype by portraying this very securely attached guy Noah

0:24:11.607 --> 0:24:15.727
<v Speaker 1>who's trying to pin down an avoidant woman Joanne, who

0:24:15.807 --> 0:24:18.007
<v Speaker 1>is a bit of a fuck up. And it also

0:24:18.087 --> 0:24:21.327
<v Speaker 1>has a great subplot of the main character's siblings, and

0:24:21.327 --> 0:24:23.607
<v Speaker 1>this is the second sort of theme we wanted to explore.

0:24:24.207 --> 0:24:27.607
<v Speaker 1>Noah's brother and Joe and sister call themselves loser siblings,

0:24:27.647 --> 0:24:30.007
<v Speaker 1>and they make a group chat between the two of

0:24:30.047 --> 0:24:30.927
<v Speaker 1>them called.

0:24:30.847 --> 0:24:34.647
<v Speaker 8>That having siblings is hard, especially when one sibling is

0:24:34.687 --> 0:24:38.127
<v Speaker 8>the clear loser. You may be suffering from losers siblings syndrome.

0:24:38.167 --> 0:24:40.927
<v Speaker 8>If your sibling cringed in school when teachers asked if

0:24:40.967 --> 0:24:43.327
<v Speaker 8>the two of you were related, your sibling jokes that

0:24:43.367 --> 0:24:45.327
<v Speaker 8>you'll have to live in their basement one day. There's

0:24:45.327 --> 0:24:47.807
<v Speaker 8>a secret family group chat that you're not a part

0:24:47.847 --> 0:24:50.487
<v Speaker 8>of you did it yet another walking red flag, and

0:24:50.527 --> 0:24:54.087
<v Speaker 8>instead of being surprised, your family says, that's so you

0:24:54.087 --> 0:24:58.847
<v Speaker 8>you were born the middle child. Sound familiar, we thought.

0:24:58.647 --> 0:25:02.207
<v Speaker 1>So that's been so successful that TikTok is demanding the

0:25:02.287 --> 0:25:05.607
<v Speaker 1>loser siblings, who are Justine Loop who plays Morgan and

0:25:05.607 --> 0:25:08.847
<v Speaker 1>Timothy Simons who plays Sasha, have their own show because

0:25:08.847 --> 0:25:12.367
<v Speaker 1>they want to what happens with them. I actually, funnily enough,

0:25:12.367 --> 0:25:15.287
<v Speaker 1>did an episode of No Filter this week about attachment

0:25:15.327 --> 0:25:17.807
<v Speaker 1>theory and this idea of the secure attachment style and

0:25:17.847 --> 0:25:20.527
<v Speaker 1>all the other attachment styles. There are three others, and

0:25:20.567 --> 0:25:23.647
<v Speaker 1>the secure is the most healthy, but it's not shown

0:25:23.727 --> 0:25:25.807
<v Speaker 1>in rom coms very.

0:25:25.687 --> 0:25:29.807
<v Speaker 4>Much ever, and it's not ever shown in even like

0:25:30.087 --> 0:25:33.087
<v Speaker 4>fiction movies, rom coms because in order for there to

0:25:33.127 --> 0:25:36.727
<v Speaker 4>be a complication, that complication often has to be internal.

0:25:37.127 --> 0:25:42.087
<v Speaker 4>So there are all these roadblocks, so someone is anxiously

0:25:42.127 --> 0:25:44.887
<v Speaker 4>attached or avoidant, and so you have one chasing like

0:25:44.887 --> 0:25:46.087
<v Speaker 4>a cat and mouse situation.

0:25:46.247 --> 0:25:46.607
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:25:46.647 --> 0:25:50.207
<v Speaker 4>What was genius about this was that the complication which

0:25:50.247 --> 0:25:54.247
<v Speaker 4>is required in order to sustain a ten episode.

0:25:54.007 --> 0:25:55.207
<v Speaker 1>And ten episodes is long.

0:25:55.327 --> 0:25:59.487
<v Speaker 4>It's long. All the complications were external. They were the

0:25:59.527 --> 0:26:02.247
<v Speaker 4>fact that he is Jewish and he's around.

0:26:02.287 --> 0:26:06.047
<v Speaker 1>He didn't approve, His family didn't approve, her sister didn't approve.

0:26:06.287 --> 0:26:10.887
<v Speaker 4>Yeah. So actually their relationship from the beginning, and what

0:26:10.967 --> 0:26:14.447
<v Speaker 4>I thought was so appealing about it was that I went,

0:26:14.807 --> 0:26:17.767
<v Speaker 4>that is what it's like meeting your person, like when

0:26:17.807 --> 0:26:20.887
<v Speaker 4>you fall in love. I'm sure this isn't universal, but

0:26:21.167 --> 0:26:23.567
<v Speaker 4>in my experience when I fell in love, it became

0:26:23.687 --> 0:26:28.207
<v Speaker 4>very uncomplicated internally. There wasn't will he text. You know,

0:26:28.247 --> 0:26:31.447
<v Speaker 4>we've just seen the phenomenon of it ends with us,

0:26:31.647 --> 0:26:37.567
<v Speaker 4>where there's all this really toxic behavior that toxic stuff

0:26:38.207 --> 0:26:41.927
<v Speaker 4>for you know, healthy relationships often evaporates. And this became

0:26:42.087 --> 0:26:45.487
<v Speaker 4>like a bingo card of green flax of all the

0:26:45.527 --> 0:26:48.687
<v Speaker 4>things that when you see in someone, like organizing the date,

0:26:48.927 --> 0:26:53.887
<v Speaker 4>being emotionally available, apologizing, went last stuff up, not lying,

0:26:54.047 --> 0:26:56.207
<v Speaker 4>not hiding things, not hiding things.

0:26:55.927 --> 0:26:57.287
<v Speaker 1>All of it transparent.

0:26:57.607 --> 0:27:01.127
<v Speaker 4>Was like a guidebook. There's this article going around about

0:27:01.167 --> 0:27:03.327
<v Speaker 4>a different movie and kind of praise kink. This is

0:27:03.367 --> 0:27:07.047
<v Speaker 4>like healthy relationship kink in terms of the woman who

0:27:07.167 --> 0:27:12.087
<v Speaker 4>just wants someone who is stay predictable clearly is really

0:27:12.087 --> 0:27:16.287
<v Speaker 4>into her. Yeah, And there's a complication because otherwise we

0:27:16.287 --> 0:27:18.727
<v Speaker 4>wouldn't watch it. But it's all external.

0:27:19.327 --> 0:27:22.487
<v Speaker 2>Does that actually exist though in real life? Like that's secure?

0:27:22.727 --> 0:27:26.927
<v Speaker 3>Like I've never once met a secure person In relationships,

0:27:27.007 --> 0:27:29.407
<v Speaker 3>I feel like there's always and always am anxious, like

0:27:29.447 --> 0:27:31.887
<v Speaker 3>someone's always chasing, someone always likes the other person a

0:27:31.887 --> 0:27:32.487
<v Speaker 3>little bit more.

0:27:32.847 --> 0:27:36.767
<v Speaker 1>Yes, but you don't have to be avoidant. I think

0:27:36.807 --> 0:27:40.247
<v Speaker 1>that in this I said that Joanne was avoidant. She

0:27:40.287 --> 0:27:45.167
<v Speaker 1>you're right, Aunt Jesse. She's not actually avoidant, but she's complicated,

0:27:45.327 --> 0:27:49.047
<v Speaker 1>complicated and she doesn't know, but you're right. They just

0:27:49.087 --> 0:27:49.847
<v Speaker 1>want to be together.

0:27:50.167 --> 0:27:52.367
<v Speaker 4>Early on in the series, she has this moment where

0:27:52.367 --> 0:27:55.847
<v Speaker 4>she says, I'm terrified I'm too much, that I'm going

0:27:55.927 --> 0:27:57.527
<v Speaker 4>to say I want you, that I'm going to have

0:27:57.567 --> 0:27:59.487
<v Speaker 4>to rely on someone, and that You're going to say

0:27:59.487 --> 0:28:01.887
<v Speaker 4>I'm too much. And I was reading this review that said,

0:28:02.127 --> 0:28:04.447
<v Speaker 4>you know, millions of women around the world have had

0:28:04.447 --> 0:28:07.887
<v Speaker 4>that exact dialogue where they've tried to sustain their own

0:28:08.007 --> 0:28:10.407
<v Speaker 4>sort of independence because they don't want to be porous

0:28:10.407 --> 0:28:12.127
<v Speaker 4>and they don't want to rely on someone because they're

0:28:12.207 --> 0:28:16.047
<v Speaker 4>terrified of being let down. And in this case, the

0:28:16.087 --> 0:28:20.087
<v Speaker 4>show was almost showing the stability of Adam Brady.

0:28:19.847 --> 0:28:21.487
<v Speaker 1>It's funny you say that. My favorite line in the

0:28:21.527 --> 0:28:23.767
<v Speaker 1>whole thing, the one that just made me melt, was

0:28:23.807 --> 0:28:25.287
<v Speaker 1>when he said I can handle you.

0:28:25.887 --> 0:28:30.207
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, like, oh.

0:28:28.687 --> 0:28:31.487
<v Speaker 4>I think as well that what you say about the

0:28:31.527 --> 0:28:34.967
<v Speaker 4>loser siblings. The gold for me was also the relationship

0:28:35.007 --> 0:28:37.687
<v Speaker 4>between the sisters. I think there are a few things funnier,

0:28:37.927 --> 0:28:40.527
<v Speaker 4>you know this m than the relationship between sisters, Like

0:28:40.607 --> 0:28:45.247
<v Speaker 4>it is so nuanced and so weird and so perfectly

0:28:45.687 --> 0:28:48.847
<v Speaker 4>written that for a lot of women we also saw

0:28:48.887 --> 0:28:49.207
<v Speaker 4>it was.

0:28:49.207 --> 0:28:51.967
<v Speaker 1>The sister relationship well written, as you both have sisters

0:28:52.007 --> 0:28:52.567
<v Speaker 1>and I don't.

0:28:52.807 --> 0:28:56.047
<v Speaker 3>And I think the reason they made them sisters was

0:28:56.087 --> 0:28:58.847
<v Speaker 3>because if they were best friends and they had like

0:28:58.887 --> 0:29:00.967
<v Speaker 3>their big fights, I don't think they could have convinced

0:29:01.007 --> 0:29:03.127
<v Speaker 3>us that they would make up so quickly, whereas with

0:29:03.207 --> 0:29:04.767
<v Speaker 3>sisters you always make up.

0:29:04.727 --> 0:29:06.767
<v Speaker 4>In the same conversation, in the same conversation.

0:29:07.567 --> 0:29:09.367
<v Speaker 2>But do you want to go just watch a movie?

0:29:09.687 --> 0:29:12.887
<v Speaker 4>The chemistry as well, like everyone's talking about how this

0:29:12.927 --> 0:29:15.087
<v Speaker 4>chemistry just exploded and the kiss, and you know, they're

0:29:15.087 --> 0:29:19.407
<v Speaker 4>both obviously very attractive. Interestingly, they're totally ageless, like they

0:29:19.407 --> 0:29:22.727
<v Speaker 4>don't give any indications of how old they are marriage.

0:29:22.767 --> 0:29:26.087
<v Speaker 4>Babies don't really come up other than the Jewish thing.

0:29:26.607 --> 0:29:29.447
<v Speaker 4>But the chemistry for me came from the humor, like

0:29:29.487 --> 0:29:31.247
<v Speaker 4>they just had exactly the same sense of humor, and

0:29:31.287 --> 0:29:33.807
<v Speaker 4>that was the hottest thing. The banter, the banter that

0:29:33.927 --> 0:29:37.567
<v Speaker 4>kind of went back and forth. And the podcasting I

0:29:37.607 --> 0:29:40.967
<v Speaker 4>thought was funny because Sex and City is obviously like

0:29:41.047 --> 0:29:44.527
<v Speaker 4>the kind of sitcom that every millennial gen X woman

0:29:44.607 --> 0:29:47.327
<v Speaker 4>is obsessed with, and that was the column. The rom

0:29:47.407 --> 0:29:49.967
<v Speaker 4>com has this device of like even how to Lose

0:29:50.007 --> 0:29:52.247
<v Speaker 4>a Guy in Ten Days, where it's the column and

0:29:52.247 --> 0:29:54.967
<v Speaker 4>you're writing and you're living and you're reflecting and you're funny.

0:29:55.047 --> 0:29:57.447
<v Speaker 1>It's the career girl of the moment, what's her job?

0:29:57.687 --> 0:30:00.327
<v Speaker 4>Yes? And in this it was basically call her.

0:30:00.327 --> 0:30:03.727
<v Speaker 1>Day, yes, except with two of them. And it's funny

0:30:03.727 --> 0:30:06.687
<v Speaker 1>because I went and listened to their actual podcast, which

0:30:06.727 --> 0:30:11.127
<v Speaker 1>is shambolish, like it's not it made me feel good

0:30:11.167 --> 0:30:13.127
<v Speaker 1>about us in terms of how organized we are, but

0:30:13.167 --> 0:30:15.287
<v Speaker 1>it is actually a very accurate depiction and they are

0:30:15.367 --> 0:30:18.087
<v Speaker 1>just like wandering off and going to the bathroom and eating.

0:30:18.127 --> 0:30:20.247
<v Speaker 1>And it's funny because I think they've got a whole

0:30:20.287 --> 0:30:23.647
<v Speaker 1>lot more listeners now and everyone now, but it's still

0:30:23.687 --> 0:30:26.767
<v Speaker 1>as completely shambala and disorganize. But they were saying that

0:30:26.887 --> 0:30:30.127
<v Speaker 1>one of the criticisms of the series is, oh, as

0:30:30.167 --> 0:30:33.407
<v Speaker 1>if you could make enough money to support yourself by

0:30:33.807 --> 0:30:36.687
<v Speaker 1>having this shambolic podcast, and they were like, we do,

0:30:36.967 --> 0:30:39.767
<v Speaker 1>and we have, as they threw to one of their

0:30:39.807 --> 0:30:42.927
<v Speaker 1>seventeen hours, and you actually wrote a story for Mum

0:30:43.007 --> 0:30:45.687
<v Speaker 1>and mea that was about another issue that you found

0:30:45.727 --> 0:30:47.687
<v Speaker 1>really poignant when you watch this show.

0:30:47.887 --> 0:30:50.447
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, this is exactly the relationship we were talking about before,

0:30:50.447 --> 0:30:53.967
<v Speaker 3>the relationship between Joanne and Morgan, the sisters. When you

0:30:54.007 --> 0:30:57.287
<v Speaker 3>see Joanne kind of just swept away into this relationship

0:30:57.847 --> 0:31:00.607
<v Speaker 3>and Justine access so well because you can see the

0:31:00.647 --> 0:31:02.887
<v Speaker 3>cogs in her brain like as she's acting this out

0:31:02.887 --> 0:31:08.047
<v Speaker 3>of like watching your person find their person and seeing

0:31:08.127 --> 0:31:10.847
<v Speaker 3>yourself slowly loose them, the sense of loss and the

0:31:10.887 --> 0:31:13.287
<v Speaker 3>sense of loss and you can't be upset because it's

0:31:13.287 --> 0:31:14.647
<v Speaker 3>not like you were in a relationship with them, and

0:31:14.647 --> 0:31:16.407
<v Speaker 3>you have to be happy for them because you want

0:31:16.407 --> 0:31:19.727
<v Speaker 3>them to be happy. And it's one of those situations

0:31:19.767 --> 0:31:22.007
<v Speaker 3>where it's happened to me so many times where like

0:31:22.327 --> 0:31:24.407
<v Speaker 3>I've had my best friend and then she falls in

0:31:24.447 --> 0:31:27.087
<v Speaker 3>love and I see her slowly like stepping out of

0:31:27.087 --> 0:31:29.407
<v Speaker 3>my life in weird ways, like finding out like oh,

0:31:29.407 --> 0:31:31.767
<v Speaker 3>I'm not your emergency contact anymore, or like oh, you

0:31:31.807 --> 0:31:33.687
<v Speaker 3>don't have me on find my friends anymore. And I'm

0:31:33.687 --> 0:31:35.767
<v Speaker 3>meant to be okay with that. And I don't even

0:31:35.807 --> 0:31:38.527
<v Speaker 3>get the breakup. Yeah, Like I just get.

0:31:38.327 --> 0:31:39.047
<v Speaker 2>The slow goo.

0:31:39.247 --> 0:31:42.967
<v Speaker 1>That's so interesting. That's a little bit like when your

0:31:43.047 --> 0:31:45.687
<v Speaker 1>child grows up and falls in love and moves away

0:31:45.687 --> 0:31:47.767
<v Speaker 1>from me. It's a little bit like when Luca found you, Jesse.

0:31:48.487 --> 0:31:52.087
<v Speaker 1>Not such a sense the sense of loss was maybe

0:31:52.767 --> 0:31:55.967
<v Speaker 1>was smaller for me. There was also the beautiful sense

0:31:56.007 --> 0:31:59.127
<v Speaker 1>of gain of watching your person be loved in the

0:31:59.167 --> 0:32:02.967
<v Speaker 1>way that you think they deserve to be loved. That's beautiful.

0:32:03.287 --> 0:32:05.447
<v Speaker 4>I certainly had that with Claire, like when she met

0:32:05.527 --> 0:32:08.567
<v Speaker 4>her person a lot younger than I did. It was

0:32:08.767 --> 0:32:13.527
<v Speaker 4>this me of grief and joy, like this bizarre, bizarre mix.

0:32:13.687 --> 0:32:15.967
<v Speaker 3>And I think that's why I was impressed they made

0:32:16.007 --> 0:32:20.927
<v Speaker 3>them sisters, because even being that single best friend, you know,

0:32:21.007 --> 0:32:23.407
<v Speaker 3>there are certain things you can't say without it sounding

0:32:23.447 --> 0:32:26.007
<v Speaker 3>like you're the sad single best friend, Like you can't

0:32:26.087 --> 0:32:28.367
<v Speaker 3>comment on their partner if you didn't like something they said,

0:32:28.407 --> 0:32:30.927
<v Speaker 3>because then you're jealous. You're automatically you're a jealous person

0:32:30.967 --> 0:32:32.807
<v Speaker 3>who just wants to be in a relationship. I'm having

0:32:32.847 --> 0:32:35.327
<v Speaker 3>a sad dating app with your sister or with friends

0:32:35.607 --> 0:32:37.567
<v Speaker 3>with friends, it's happened with friends. I think there's too

0:32:37.647 --> 0:32:39.207
<v Speaker 3>much of an age gap between me and my sister.

0:32:39.527 --> 0:32:42.047
<v Speaker 3>But when they were having that fight and Joanne said

0:32:42.167 --> 0:32:44.007
<v Speaker 3>it's like, not my fault, you're still un stuck on

0:32:44.047 --> 0:32:46.567
<v Speaker 3>the sad dating apps, that hit something in me.

0:32:47.167 --> 0:32:49.687
<v Speaker 1>Oh that was that was a deep cart.

0:32:49.527 --> 0:32:51.727
<v Speaker 3>Because I feel like when you're talking about like the

0:32:51.807 --> 0:32:54.087
<v Speaker 3>dating app stage of life, a lot of people see

0:32:54.087 --> 0:32:56.687
<v Speaker 3>that as a phase, and I'm like, some women have

0:32:56.727 --> 0:32:59.447
<v Speaker 3>been on dating apps the entire like dating life.

0:32:59.167 --> 0:33:03.647
<v Speaker 7>And there's a smugness of like I graduated, I got out, Yeah,

0:33:03.687 --> 0:33:07.127
<v Speaker 7>and you're still stuck. Like that hit a nerve and

0:33:07.167 --> 0:33:09.647
<v Speaker 7>I was like so happy that that blew up for them,

0:33:09.767 --> 0:33:11.287
<v Speaker 7>Like that was like the catalyst.

0:33:10.927 --> 0:33:13.287
<v Speaker 1>Because you felt defensive. Yeah, out louder is if you

0:33:13.287 --> 0:33:15.887
<v Speaker 1>want to hear more about attachment styles and what yours

0:33:15.927 --> 0:33:19.087
<v Speaker 1>might be, plus what it says about you. Guess what,

0:33:19.367 --> 0:33:21.567
<v Speaker 1>I'm not one of the functional ones. There's only one

0:33:21.607 --> 0:33:26.047
<v Speaker 1>functional one and I'm not have a Listen to today's

0:33:26.047 --> 0:33:28.487
<v Speaker 1>episode of No Filter when you can hear my conversation

0:33:28.567 --> 0:33:31.447
<v Speaker 1>with doctor Morgan Anderson, who is an expert on attachment theory.

0:33:31.487 --> 0:33:33.367
<v Speaker 1>There is a link in the show notes.

0:33:33.127 --> 0:33:34.047
<v Speaker 4>And what do you think you are?

0:33:34.327 --> 0:33:35.207
<v Speaker 2>What attachment style?

0:33:35.367 --> 0:33:37.767
<v Speaker 3>I've been told by a man I think you said

0:33:37.807 --> 0:33:39.807
<v Speaker 3>to me? Have you always been an avoidant?

0:33:40.047 --> 0:33:43.847
<v Speaker 1>So the four styles are secure, avoidant, anxious, and disorganized?

0:33:44.047 --> 0:33:44.887
<v Speaker 2>Which one's the worst?

0:33:45.847 --> 0:33:46.127
<v Speaker 1>Is there?

0:33:46.167 --> 0:33:46.687
<v Speaker 2>Avoidant?

0:33:46.927 --> 0:33:48.807
<v Speaker 1>Secure is the only one you want to be. That's

0:33:48.847 --> 0:33:50.487
<v Speaker 1>where we're all aiming to be. It's at the top

0:33:50.527 --> 0:33:52.887
<v Speaker 1>of the leaderboard, something to work towards.

0:33:53.087 --> 0:33:54.527
<v Speaker 4>If you want to know what Holly and I are,

0:33:54.807 --> 0:33:57.567
<v Speaker 4>you can listen to tomorrow's subscribe episode where look, we

0:33:57.607 --> 0:34:00.407
<v Speaker 4>took a quiz and we had some insights and we

0:34:00.487 --> 0:34:02.727
<v Speaker 4>had there was a bit of soul searching, So you

0:34:02.767 --> 0:34:07.807
<v Speaker 4>can listen to that tomorrow. Wan unlimited out loud access.

0:34:08.047 --> 0:34:12.167
<v Speaker 4>We drop episodes every Tuesday and Thursday exclusively for Mum

0:34:12.207 --> 0:34:15.207
<v Speaker 4>and Maya subscribers. Follow the link in the show notes

0:34:15.247 --> 0:34:17.727
<v Speaker 4>to get us in your ears five days a week.

0:34:17.847 --> 0:34:20.607
<v Speaker 4>And a huge thank you to all our current subscribers.

0:34:28.127 --> 0:34:32.727
<v Speaker 6>Nate May why hey me your mate? Mate?

0:34:33.127 --> 0:34:33.407
<v Speaker 5>Thanks?

0:34:33.447 --> 0:34:33.727
<v Speaker 9>Mate?

0:34:33.727 --> 0:34:34.327
<v Speaker 1>Look mate?

0:34:34.527 --> 0:34:35.967
<v Speaker 8>No, you look mate.

0:34:36.327 --> 0:34:39.327
<v Speaker 3>A father of a retail worker went on Reddit to

0:34:39.487 --> 0:34:43.607
<v Speaker 3>ask if calling someone mate was now offensive. So he

0:34:43.647 --> 0:34:46.447
<v Speaker 3>said that his daughter called the customer mate, and towards

0:34:46.487 --> 0:34:49.287
<v Speaker 3>the end of their interaction, the customer said, can I

0:34:49.327 --> 0:34:52.407
<v Speaker 3>tell you something? Please don't call me mate. His daughter

0:34:52.447 --> 0:34:55.167
<v Speaker 3>Dan apologized and said, I'm sorry if I've offended you.

0:34:55.247 --> 0:34:58.447
<v Speaker 3>The customer said it's unprofessional to use that word in

0:34:58.487 --> 0:35:02.007
<v Speaker 3>the workplace. He said that his daughter was pretty sure

0:35:02.047 --> 0:35:05.087
<v Speaker 3>the customer was Australian and has now kind of spiraled

0:35:05.127 --> 0:35:09.927
<v Speaker 3>and has like stopped using any sort of like langui customers.

0:35:10.447 --> 0:35:12.047
<v Speaker 3>So I went onto this Reddit post and I was

0:35:12.087 --> 0:35:14.447
<v Speaker 3>looking at all of the comments, and a lot of

0:35:14.447 --> 0:35:17.367
<v Speaker 3>them were quite shocked that someone said that it's offensive,

0:35:17.447 --> 0:35:19.887
<v Speaker 3>like don't call me mate. But there were few people

0:35:19.887 --> 0:35:24.647
<v Speaker 3>who did say that it's not offensive, but it is unprofessional. Jesse,

0:35:24.927 --> 0:35:27.767
<v Speaker 3>what goes through your mind and someone' say hey mate,

0:35:27.887 --> 0:35:28.447
<v Speaker 3>how are you going?

0:35:28.527 --> 0:35:30.407
<v Speaker 4>It is so neutral to me that I don't even

0:35:30.447 --> 0:35:33.447
<v Speaker 4>hear it. I absolutely use it in the workplace. I

0:35:33.487 --> 0:35:35.247
<v Speaker 4>used to work behind a bar for years and years

0:35:35.727 --> 0:35:38.807
<v Speaker 4>always said mate, I like it because it's gender neutral,

0:35:39.007 --> 0:35:40.287
<v Speaker 4>a concert to men.

0:35:40.167 --> 0:35:41.567
<v Speaker 2>And women, so you say mate to women.

0:35:41.847 --> 0:35:46.287
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, yeah, absolutely. I wonder if one of the reasons

0:35:46.527 --> 0:35:49.847
<v Speaker 4>if I have got this gender dynamic, correct, did an

0:35:49.927 --> 0:35:53.207
<v Speaker 4>older man not like being called mate by a younger woman?

0:35:53.807 --> 0:35:57.887
<v Speaker 4>And is it because the word mate infers equality? And

0:35:57.927 --> 0:36:01.807
<v Speaker 4>that's why I think that it's uniquely Australian because everyone's

0:36:02.047 --> 0:36:04.447
<v Speaker 4>your mate. It kind of suggests that there's no hierarchy,

0:36:04.487 --> 0:36:05.647
<v Speaker 4>that we're all on the same level.

0:36:06.127 --> 0:36:08.407
<v Speaker 1>And there are some thought she should have been subservient.

0:36:08.567 --> 0:36:10.727
<v Speaker 4>Yes, I wonder if that's what it was about, that

0:36:10.767 --> 0:36:13.887
<v Speaker 4>he should have been sir or something that kind of.

0:36:14.247 --> 0:36:17.367
<v Speaker 1>My king, my king, that it was too informal.

0:36:16.967 --> 0:36:20.047
<v Speaker 4>It was too informal, and that she should because sometimes

0:36:20.047 --> 0:36:21.767
<v Speaker 4>they teach you. I remember it when I worked at

0:36:21.807 --> 0:36:23.807
<v Speaker 4>this pub. It was they wanted you to say sir

0:36:23.847 --> 0:36:25.527
<v Speaker 4>and Ma'm like as a way of.

0:36:25.567 --> 0:36:27.847
<v Speaker 2>At the pub at the pub, and I was like, I.

0:36:27.847 --> 0:36:30.807
<v Speaker 4>Will, over my dead body, I will just not be referring.

0:36:30.967 --> 0:36:33.207
<v Speaker 4>And I also think it makes people feel old and

0:36:33.247 --> 0:36:33.967
<v Speaker 4>I think I just.

0:36:34.047 --> 0:36:35.687
<v Speaker 2>Think someone younger than you exactly.

0:36:36.127 --> 0:36:38.527
<v Speaker 4>Sometimes I see it in the eyes of people who

0:36:38.567 --> 0:36:40.567
<v Speaker 4>are like giving you a coffee or whatever, where they

0:36:40.647 --> 0:36:44.807
<v Speaker 4>choose whether they're going to go with you know, dull, ma'm.

0:36:45.287 --> 0:36:49.327
<v Speaker 1>Pet pet petal love sweetheart.

0:36:49.407 --> 0:36:51.527
<v Speaker 4>Yeah. I don't think we should be choosing spur of

0:36:51.527 --> 0:36:53.407
<v Speaker 4>the moment. I think it makes people feel judged. I

0:36:53.407 --> 0:36:54.367
<v Speaker 4>think we just go mate.

0:36:54.567 --> 0:36:55.767
<v Speaker 1>Eating mates a safe bet.

0:36:55.807 --> 0:36:56.447
<v Speaker 4>I think it's safe.

0:36:56.487 --> 0:36:59.367
<v Speaker 1>I was thinking about the word mate and how its

0:36:59.487 --> 0:37:05.167
<v Speaker 1>versatility is possibly what can make it problematic, because how

0:37:05.167 --> 0:37:08.087
<v Speaker 1>it's intended might not be how it's received. So tone

0:37:08.127 --> 0:37:10.567
<v Speaker 1>and setting and subject all these things can completely alter

0:37:10.647 --> 0:37:12.887
<v Speaker 1>the definition of the words. So you can call your

0:37:12.887 --> 0:37:15.167
<v Speaker 1>best friend mate with great affection, right, So that's the

0:37:15.207 --> 0:37:18.007
<v Speaker 1>way I think most people would be thinking about it

0:37:18.047 --> 0:37:21.767
<v Speaker 1>in this context, like mate, have you been? You know?

0:37:22.127 --> 0:37:25.367
<v Speaker 1>But you can also address a complete stranger as mate

0:37:25.607 --> 0:37:28.167
<v Speaker 1>in an unfamiliar encounter, particularly if you don't know their name,

0:37:28.207 --> 0:37:30.607
<v Speaker 1>if you've forgot their name. Mate or babe are the

0:37:30.687 --> 0:37:31.527
<v Speaker 1>two easy ones.

0:37:31.607 --> 0:37:35.007
<v Speaker 4>Yep. Luca has said to me before, actually we've been

0:37:35.047 --> 0:37:38.087
<v Speaker 4>doing exciting at home and I've gone something like listen here,

0:37:38.447 --> 0:37:40.287
<v Speaker 4>like just use the word mate to Luca, and he

0:37:40.327 --> 0:37:43.527
<v Speaker 4>has said that gives me that he really doesn't like

0:37:43.567 --> 0:37:45.607
<v Speaker 4>it in a romantic relationship. Because it is.

0:37:46.127 --> 0:37:48.127
<v Speaker 1>It's quite snarky.

0:37:48.567 --> 0:37:53.207
<v Speaker 4>It's snarky, but it's also very unsexual. Yeah, like, that's true.

0:37:53.287 --> 0:37:54.607
<v Speaker 4>It's a little bit distant.

0:37:54.927 --> 0:37:57.367
<v Speaker 1>Do you use it? But there's other ways. I've got

0:37:57.367 --> 0:38:02.607
<v Speaker 1>more ways. It can be a complete sentence like may

0:38:02.807 --> 0:38:07.647
<v Speaker 1>like that's almost. That can also convey exasperation. And then

0:38:07.647 --> 0:38:10.807
<v Speaker 1>if you say it like bead ly, like with a

0:38:10.807 --> 0:38:14.167
<v Speaker 1>bit of a snap in your voice, it can make

0:38:14.207 --> 0:38:17.807
<v Speaker 1>it very clear that you're pissed off, like mate, you're

0:38:17.847 --> 0:38:21.407
<v Speaker 1>in my car spot. Yeah, yeah, anyone said that to me, Yeah,

0:38:21.447 --> 0:38:22.207
<v Speaker 1>just yesterday.

0:38:22.487 --> 0:38:24.567
<v Speaker 4>It feels more aggressive than if they said you're in

0:38:24.567 --> 0:38:26.087
<v Speaker 4>my car correct. Absolutely.

0:38:26.167 --> 0:38:28.407
<v Speaker 1>And then old mate maybe she called him old mate

0:38:28.407 --> 0:38:31.087
<v Speaker 1>even like that. I actually like old mate. And then

0:38:31.127 --> 0:38:33.647
<v Speaker 1>when we often will say to Holly or you, like

0:38:33.687 --> 0:38:37.207
<v Speaker 1>if I'm talking about Jordan Peterson, I'll go, your mate

0:38:37.487 --> 0:38:38.687
<v Speaker 1>is in the need, which is like.

0:38:40.287 --> 0:38:40.767
<v Speaker 2>Figure out.

0:38:41.047 --> 0:38:43.487
<v Speaker 1>So there's so many different ways to use it, and

0:38:43.527 --> 0:38:47.007
<v Speaker 1>that's why I think maybe it can be misinterpreted. Sometimes

0:38:47.247 --> 0:38:48.527
<v Speaker 1>I'm similar to Luca.

0:38:48.847 --> 0:38:51.407
<v Speaker 3>I never use the word mate. I hate it, but

0:38:51.527 --> 0:38:54.327
<v Speaker 3>I will use the word mate when I'm talking to

0:38:54.567 --> 0:38:56.807
<v Speaker 3>certain men to make sure that they know I don't

0:38:56.807 --> 0:38:57.727
<v Speaker 3>want to have sex with them.

0:38:58.487 --> 0:39:02.247
<v Speaker 1>Oh nice, Okay, play that out. How does it work? Well?

0:39:02.287 --> 0:39:04.527
<v Speaker 3>If a guy comes up to me and he's like, hey,

0:39:04.607 --> 0:39:06.487
<v Speaker 3>can I buy you a drink or anything?

0:39:06.767 --> 0:39:07.567
<v Speaker 2>No thanks, mate?

0:39:08.607 --> 0:39:08.807
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:39:08.887 --> 0:39:10.607
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's like a very no.

0:39:11.047 --> 0:39:13.887
<v Speaker 1>This is platonic. Yeah, because if you just went no thanks,

0:39:14.007 --> 0:39:16.527
<v Speaker 1>it would thank you. It would open'd be like, oh

0:39:16.727 --> 0:39:18.807
<v Speaker 1>can I get you something out? I love it when

0:39:18.807 --> 0:39:22.127
<v Speaker 1>men call me mate, really, I really do. I also

0:39:22.247 --> 0:39:23.447
<v Speaker 1>like the women call me mate.

0:39:24.007 --> 0:39:24.647
<v Speaker 4>What's friendly?

0:39:24.807 --> 0:39:26.887
<v Speaker 1>When my kids called me mate, they're taking the pierce.

0:39:27.287 --> 0:39:31.207
<v Speaker 4>Oh yeah, absolutely, you're right mate, our executive producer who

0:39:31.287 --> 0:39:33.407
<v Speaker 4>I think this context is important because we are missing

0:39:33.407 --> 0:39:38.007
<v Speaker 4>the British perspective in Hollywood. I think you should give

0:39:38.487 --> 0:39:42.847
<v Speaker 4>a Monsurian accent. She was saying that when she first

0:39:42.887 --> 0:39:44.967
<v Speaker 4>got to Australia she found it aggressive, that it was

0:39:44.967 --> 0:39:48.127
<v Speaker 4>something that in a different context can feel like, hey, mate,

0:39:48.247 --> 0:39:51.047
<v Speaker 4>can just feel like I guess it can feel quite

0:39:51.127 --> 0:39:54.327
<v Speaker 4>bloky and aggressive. I can kind of see how that would.

0:39:54.647 --> 0:39:57.887
<v Speaker 1>It can be a bit like the precursor to some

0:39:57.927 --> 0:40:01.367
<v Speaker 1>biffo like yeah, like it can almost be an insult,

0:40:01.527 --> 0:40:03.527
<v Speaker 1>like an aggressive challenge to someone.

0:40:03.607 --> 0:40:06.647
<v Speaker 4>But the ones I'm hearing a lot lately, are hey boss?

0:40:06.767 --> 0:40:08.567
<v Speaker 4>Do you hear this like I hear it at the gym?

0:40:08.647 --> 0:40:10.607
<v Speaker 1>Queen? My daughter calls me queen.

0:40:10.767 --> 0:40:12.287
<v Speaker 2>That's so cute.

0:40:12.407 --> 0:40:14.927
<v Speaker 1>She doesn't know like, I don't care, Like I'll just

0:40:14.927 --> 0:40:15.767
<v Speaker 1>be called anything.

0:40:16.047 --> 0:40:18.687
<v Speaker 4>How about hate Chapman, Buddy?

0:40:19.607 --> 0:40:20.167
<v Speaker 1>I like buddy.

0:40:20.207 --> 0:40:22.727
<v Speaker 2>I think buddy, Hey Buddy, Hi buddy, buddy.

0:40:23.847 --> 0:40:27.927
<v Speaker 4>Kids Reddit thread said why don't you just call them friend? Hey? Friends?

0:40:28.047 --> 0:40:31.127
<v Speaker 1>I say that sometimes. I'll say hey friend if I

0:40:31.167 --> 0:40:32.887
<v Speaker 1>can't remember someone's name, often to.

0:40:32.847 --> 0:40:34.367
<v Speaker 4>The person at the cafe or the.

0:40:35.847 --> 0:40:39.807
<v Speaker 1>No, but someone who I'm familiar with. Actually, not just

0:40:39.887 --> 0:40:42.207
<v Speaker 1>people that I say sweet. I don't say a lot,

0:40:42.327 --> 0:40:45.647
<v Speaker 1>hey sweetie, hey friend. I'll say hey friend. That's like

0:40:45.727 --> 0:40:46.447
<v Speaker 1>an affectionate.

0:40:46.607 --> 0:40:49.527
<v Speaker 4>What's your term of endearment for the lovely person behind

0:40:49.527 --> 0:40:51.287
<v Speaker 4>the counter when you're doing your grocery shopping? What do

0:40:51.287 --> 0:40:51.767
<v Speaker 4>you call them?

0:40:51.927 --> 0:40:54.407
<v Speaker 1>Thanks? Your a legend. I'll call them. I use them

0:40:54.687 --> 0:40:57.687
<v Speaker 1>like a noun, like a legend. I won't say mate, No,

0:40:58.167 --> 0:41:00.767
<v Speaker 1>I won't say buddy. I won't say I say you're

0:41:00.887 --> 0:41:01.487
<v Speaker 1>a babe.

0:41:01.807 --> 0:41:02.047
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:41:02.447 --> 0:41:04.767
<v Speaker 1>I won't call them anything. I don't know. I've got

0:41:04.767 --> 0:41:07.687
<v Speaker 1>a friend who calls waiters darling. Female waiters I don't.

0:41:08.087 --> 0:41:09.967
<v Speaker 1>I don't like it. I think she's never been a

0:41:09.967 --> 0:41:10.927
<v Speaker 1>waiter and I have been.

0:41:11.447 --> 0:41:12.207
<v Speaker 4>I don't hate it.

0:41:12.407 --> 0:41:13.647
<v Speaker 1>You don't like you don't want darling?

0:41:13.767 --> 0:41:16.727
<v Speaker 4>Darling? Well, it depends on the tone and whether or

0:41:16.807 --> 0:41:19.847
<v Speaker 4>not it's condescending. But if they're being complimentary, I'm happy

0:41:19.887 --> 0:41:20.847
<v Speaker 4>for them to call me anything.

0:41:20.887 --> 0:41:24.047
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, oh no, I don't mind. I use that

0:41:24.127 --> 0:41:25.447
<v Speaker 1>as a term of affection too.

0:41:26.287 --> 0:41:30.167
<v Speaker 4>As the boss in this room. Yeah, is it unprofessional?

0:41:30.527 --> 0:41:32.407
<v Speaker 4>If I was using mate a lot in the workplace

0:41:32.447 --> 0:41:33.087
<v Speaker 4>in meetings?

0:41:33.207 --> 0:41:35.167
<v Speaker 3>There was a time where you hated when we said, dude,

0:41:35.207 --> 0:41:37.007
<v Speaker 3>do you remember that, you made like a full announcement

0:41:37.247 --> 0:41:38.207
<v Speaker 3>stop calling people too.

0:41:38.607 --> 0:41:39.367
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it was weird.

0:41:39.447 --> 0:41:42.607
<v Speaker 1>I was someone who once started working here and had

0:41:42.687 --> 0:41:48.887
<v Speaker 1>just met me started calling me bestie my time. Yeah,

0:41:49.127 --> 0:41:51.607
<v Speaker 1>I think language is fun. I like people to play

0:41:51.607 --> 0:41:52.407
<v Speaker 1>with language.

0:41:52.487 --> 0:41:55.007
<v Speaker 3>So we ask people in the mumumme office who've moved

0:41:55.047 --> 0:41:57.807
<v Speaker 3>to Australia some of the phrases they did not understand.

0:41:57.847 --> 0:41:58.687
<v Speaker 2>Here's what they said.

0:41:59.807 --> 0:42:04.607
<v Speaker 6>My favorite Australian scene, possibly my favorite scene hands down

0:42:04.887 --> 0:42:08.687
<v Speaker 6>from anywhere, is I'm not here to fox fiders because

0:42:08.687 --> 0:42:11.687
<v Speaker 6>it makes sense, but at the same time, it actually

0:42:11.687 --> 0:42:14.367
<v Speaker 6>makes a lot of sense. And I'm also just waiting

0:42:14.527 --> 0:42:17.087
<v Speaker 6>to finally meet the cherson who actually is here for

0:42:17.207 --> 0:42:19.807
<v Speaker 6>fuck spiders. That would be a very special day for me.

0:42:20.247 --> 0:42:22.647
<v Speaker 9>So when I first moved to Australia from New Zealand,

0:42:22.887 --> 0:42:27.007
<v Speaker 9>we would always go to barbacues and drinks with a chiliban,

0:42:27.407 --> 0:42:29.287
<v Speaker 9>and so I'd be telling everyone to put everything in

0:42:29.327 --> 0:42:31.687
<v Speaker 9>the chiliban, or like where's beer? And I'm like, well,

0:42:31.727 --> 0:42:34.847
<v Speaker 9>in the chiliban and you call it eski here, which

0:42:34.887 --> 0:42:37.207
<v Speaker 9>is actually after the brand where there. We're quite literal

0:42:37.247 --> 0:42:38.967
<v Speaker 9>on New Zealand, and we call it a chili ban,

0:42:39.047 --> 0:42:41.087
<v Speaker 9>so something that you get chilled under them.

0:42:41.327 --> 0:42:44.207
<v Speaker 5>Okay. So when I first moved to Australia, some very

0:42:44.207 --> 0:42:47.367
<v Speaker 5>lovely mums at the school gates said, you know, come over.

0:42:47.647 --> 0:42:50.767
<v Speaker 5>I got a few people coming. Bring a plate. I

0:42:50.767 --> 0:42:52.847
<v Speaker 5>thought this was a little strange. I was like, I

0:42:52.887 --> 0:42:54.687
<v Speaker 5>can bring a plate. I will bring a plate. But

0:42:54.727 --> 0:42:56.407
<v Speaker 5>then I was like, do I put food on the plate?

0:42:56.487 --> 0:42:56.927
<v Speaker 9>Surely not.

0:42:57.207 --> 0:42:58.087
<v Speaker 5>I don't understand.

0:42:58.207 --> 0:42:59.607
<v Speaker 1>Anyway, I turned up.

0:42:59.727 --> 0:43:03.167
<v Speaker 5>I had a pack of emergency Sos tim Tams in

0:43:03.207 --> 0:43:06.687
<v Speaker 5>my bag, but I also had a plate just in case,

0:43:07.327 --> 0:43:10.367
<v Speaker 5>and I've got lots of expat friends here who have

0:43:10.447 --> 0:43:11.167
<v Speaker 5>all confessed the.

0:43:11.167 --> 0:43:14.047
<v Speaker 1>Same We had no idea. Out Louders, I'm sure you've

0:43:14.087 --> 0:43:16.767
<v Speaker 1>got your own head to the Outlauders Facebook group and

0:43:16.847 --> 0:43:20.727
<v Speaker 1>share them with us. That's it from us today, out Louders.

0:43:20.767 --> 0:43:22.887
<v Speaker 1>We could go on, but our producers are hovering with

0:43:22.927 --> 0:43:24.407
<v Speaker 1>a taser to stop us talking.

0:43:24.487 --> 0:43:27.847
<v Speaker 4>Good luck, out louders. If you enjoyed Amelia Lester on

0:43:27.887 --> 0:43:30.087
<v Speaker 4>the show last week, then you'll probably love our US

0:43:30.167 --> 0:43:34.007
<v Speaker 4>election subscriber episodes. I learned so much about Milania Trump

0:43:34.207 --> 0:43:36.287
<v Speaker 4>because Amelia, of course sat down and read the whole

0:43:36.287 --> 0:43:38.487
<v Speaker 4>book beginning to end. So if you want to hear that,

0:43:38.527 --> 0:43:40.447
<v Speaker 4>there's a link to that episode in the show notes.

0:43:40.527 --> 0:43:44.727
<v Speaker 1>Bye. Shout out to any Muma Mia subscribers listening. If

0:43:44.767 --> 0:43:47.367
<v Speaker 1>you love the show and want to support us as well,

0:43:47.567 --> 0:43:49.967
<v Speaker 1>subscribing to mom and Mia is the very best way

0:43:49.967 --> 0:43:52.047
<v Speaker 1>to do so. There is a link in the episode

0:43:52.087 --> 0:43:52.487
<v Speaker 1>description