WEBVTT - Where Has All The Swearing Gone & The Bush Wee Rule

0:00:03.920 --> 0:00:06.160
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Parenting Out Loud. This is the podcast with

0:00:06.200 --> 0:00:08.319
<v Speaker 1>what parents are thinking about. I'm not Eat Bowli.

0:00:08.520 --> 0:00:11.200
<v Speaker 2>I'm Amelia Leicester and I'm Stacey Hicks and I'm so

0:00:11.280 --> 0:00:14.320
<v Speaker 2>happy to be back with you both. Sweet I am

0:00:14.360 --> 0:00:18.319
<v Speaker 2>away convention, the Sea Monkey convention that you accuse me

0:00:18.360 --> 0:00:20.200
<v Speaker 2>of being out. Yeah, it was great. Actually I've got

0:00:20.239 --> 0:00:22.720
<v Speaker 2>a full tank in my house now. But thank you

0:00:22.760 --> 0:00:23.240
<v Speaker 2>for asking.

0:00:23.320 --> 0:00:24.040
<v Speaker 3>Are they alive?

0:00:25.160 --> 0:00:26.119
<v Speaker 2>No, they're not.

0:00:27.440 --> 0:00:29.240
<v Speaker 3>No comment coming up today?

0:00:29.600 --> 0:00:32.440
<v Speaker 2>What are the rules of a kid's bush? We a

0:00:32.560 --> 0:00:35.600
<v Speaker 2>listener dilemma has raised a very important question for us.

0:00:35.880 --> 0:00:38.320
<v Speaker 4>We need to talk about swearing in twenty twenty six.

0:00:38.360 --> 0:00:41.239
<v Speaker 4>There is one place where it has completely disappeared and

0:00:41.280 --> 0:00:43.040
<v Speaker 4>there's one place where it's on the rise.

0:00:43.200 --> 0:00:47.400
<v Speaker 1>And when a public image gets complicated, is motherhood the

0:00:47.520 --> 0:00:49.080
<v Speaker 1>ultimate reputation rehab?

0:00:49.360 --> 0:00:51.800
<v Speaker 2>But first, I cannot believe it has taken me this

0:00:51.920 --> 0:00:54.200
<v Speaker 2>long to bring up Harry Styles on this show. I

0:00:54.240 --> 0:00:56.840
<v Speaker 2>even have him on my shirt today. Such is the

0:00:56.840 --> 0:00:59.600
<v Speaker 2>fangirl in me. But I finally found a way in

0:00:59.680 --> 0:01:01.520
<v Speaker 2>for this podcast, and that is to tell you this.

0:01:02.400 --> 0:01:05.840
<v Speaker 2>Harry Styles and his sister Gemma Styles are the gold

0:01:06.120 --> 0:01:10.240
<v Speaker 2>standard of siblings. They are what families dream of when

0:01:10.240 --> 0:01:13.560
<v Speaker 2>they have multiple kids. And that is because this weekend

0:01:13.800 --> 0:01:16.800
<v Speaker 2>Harry Styles broke the Wembley Stadium record for the most

0:01:16.800 --> 0:01:20.160
<v Speaker 2>consecutive shows at that stadium in a row. He did twelve,

0:01:20.560 --> 0:01:22.760
<v Speaker 2>and when you consider there's ninety thousand seats in that

0:01:22.800 --> 0:01:27.200
<v Speaker 2>stadium sold out, twelve sold out shows incredible, incredible effort.

0:01:27.200 --> 0:01:30.440
<v Speaker 4>And he's also just like jogging around London all the time, insane.

0:01:30.480 --> 0:01:33.199
<v Speaker 2>He basically does a marathon every night and then ran

0:01:33.280 --> 0:01:35.640
<v Speaker 2>to one of the shows. Yeah, just jogged to one

0:01:35.680 --> 0:01:39.400
<v Speaker 2>of his own shows at Wembley Stadium. He is my favorite.

0:01:39.560 --> 0:01:43.080
<v Speaker 2>But to surprise him at his twelfth show, they brought

0:01:43.080 --> 0:01:46.080
<v Speaker 2>out his sister, Gemma onto the stage. Now, Gemma is

0:01:46.120 --> 0:01:48.280
<v Speaker 2>not as comfortable on the stage as Harry is. You

0:01:48.320 --> 0:01:52.080
<v Speaker 2>can tell that she doesn't like being there, but she's

0:01:52.160 --> 0:01:54.360
<v Speaker 2>there to celebrate him. And I want to play you

0:01:54.360 --> 0:01:56.560
<v Speaker 2>a little of what she said. I apologize in advance

0:01:56.600 --> 0:01:58.560
<v Speaker 2>for all the screaming in the background you're going to hear,

0:01:58.720 --> 0:02:03.080
<v Speaker 2>but this is all me, but it's worth listening. I

0:02:03.080 --> 0:02:03.960
<v Speaker 2>don't think.

0:02:03.800 --> 0:02:04.880
<v Speaker 4>Of you as.

0:02:06.680 --> 0:02:08.680
<v Speaker 2>At all in say today life.

0:02:09.680 --> 0:02:14.080
<v Speaker 5>I think of you as a brother and an uncle

0:02:14.400 --> 0:02:15.959
<v Speaker 5>and a best friend.

0:02:20.200 --> 0:02:21.440
<v Speaker 6>And seeing.

0:02:22.680 --> 0:02:27.040
<v Speaker 5>The incredible community that has formed around you is.

0:02:28.480 --> 0:02:29.760
<v Speaker 4>Just indescribable.

0:02:30.440 --> 0:02:31.520
<v Speaker 2>I'm so proud of you.

0:02:32.600 --> 0:02:36.679
<v Speaker 5>I'm not just proud because you've done things like this,

0:02:36.880 --> 0:02:42.480
<v Speaker 5>which nobody does. I'm proud of who you are and

0:02:42.520 --> 0:02:46.120
<v Speaker 5>who you allow other people to be, and just the

0:02:46.240 --> 0:02:50.200
<v Speaker 5>impact that you've made on so many, not least us

0:02:50.280 --> 0:02:52.960
<v Speaker 5>who get to love you in real life.

0:02:52.960 --> 0:02:54.680
<v Speaker 2>And what privilege that is.

0:02:57.880 --> 0:03:00.120
<v Speaker 4>Thank you for being you.

0:03:00.840 --> 0:03:03.720
<v Speaker 2>Thanks to lay Oh jeez, it's real.

0:03:03.760 --> 0:03:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Twenty first birthday speech say that for the party, Gema

0:03:08.280 --> 0:03:10.000
<v Speaker 1>were there to see the music, We're there to see

0:03:10.040 --> 0:03:10.800
<v Speaker 1>Harry perform.

0:03:11.160 --> 0:03:13.440
<v Speaker 2>We know not a lot about Gemma. So she has

0:03:13.440 --> 0:03:16.280
<v Speaker 2>a public Instagram that keeps things very private. So she's

0:03:16.320 --> 0:03:19.080
<v Speaker 2>got a young child, but her life is not in

0:03:19.120 --> 0:03:23.000
<v Speaker 2>the spotlight like Harry's is. But I just it A

0:03:23.040 --> 0:03:24.720
<v Speaker 2>little bit of it hit me in the fields because

0:03:24.720 --> 0:03:27.280
<v Speaker 2>I only have one child, this little pang of guilt

0:03:27.400 --> 0:03:31.200
<v Speaker 2>of oh, imagine what that could be if your kids

0:03:31.240 --> 0:03:33.960
<v Speaker 2>grew up and loved one another that much. But then

0:03:34.000 --> 0:03:36.480
<v Speaker 2>I remember that this is the best case scenario. This

0:03:36.600 --> 0:03:38.920
<v Speaker 2>is like top tier. And just when I thought I

0:03:38.960 --> 0:03:41.920
<v Speaker 2>could not be more emotional about this. Their mum Anne

0:03:42.000 --> 0:03:45.440
<v Speaker 2>and entered the chat. Now, Anne loves Instagram. Anne loves

0:03:45.480 --> 0:03:47.840
<v Speaker 2>an Instagram post and she posted a photo of the

0:03:47.840 --> 0:03:49.320
<v Speaker 2>two of them as kids, and I just want to

0:03:49.360 --> 0:03:51.240
<v Speaker 2>read you what she wrote on it. She said, how

0:03:51.280 --> 0:03:53.560
<v Speaker 2>could I have possibly known then that he would break

0:03:53.600 --> 0:03:55.840
<v Speaker 2>records doing exactly what he was put in this world

0:03:55.880 --> 0:03:57.760
<v Speaker 2>to do, that he would grow up to be the

0:03:57.840 --> 0:04:00.800
<v Speaker 2>kind of man the world needs right now? My gorgeous

0:04:00.840 --> 0:04:03.920
<v Speaker 2>girl has loved and protected him always, even when he

0:04:04.000 --> 0:04:07.320
<v Speaker 2>was the annoying little brother to his quiet, studious big sister.

0:04:07.880 --> 0:04:10.200
<v Speaker 2>I could not be prouder of you both as humans,

0:04:10.240 --> 0:04:13.280
<v Speaker 2>as siblings, and as my babies, knowing you're always there

0:04:13.320 --> 0:04:16.080
<v Speaker 2>for me, but more importantly for each other. That's my

0:04:16.120 --> 0:04:17.960
<v Speaker 2>biggest achievement. That is my award.

0:04:18.080 --> 0:04:18.960
<v Speaker 6>That's so lovely.

0:04:19.360 --> 0:04:20.640
<v Speaker 2>I love them.

0:04:20.920 --> 0:04:23.280
<v Speaker 4>There's an Atlantic headline I think about all the time

0:04:23.279 --> 0:04:27.120
<v Speaker 4>which said, the longest relationship of your life will be

0:04:27.160 --> 0:04:28.159
<v Speaker 4>the one with your sibling.

0:04:28.600 --> 0:04:32.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Yeah, then with you from the start, from the start.

0:04:32.960 --> 0:04:33.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:04:33.240 --> 0:04:35.080
<v Speaker 2>Well good on him and did good?

0:04:36.160 --> 0:04:36.360
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:04:36.440 --> 0:04:38.680
<v Speaker 1>Can we just take a really quick moment to just

0:04:38.920 --> 0:04:42.400
<v Speaker 1>recognize that siblings are romanticized in culture?

0:04:43.000 --> 0:04:43.800
<v Speaker 6>Like this is.

0:04:43.760 --> 0:04:46.440
<v Speaker 1>Lovely and I'm with you. It's lovely and we need more.

0:04:46.440 --> 0:04:49.120
<v Speaker 1>It's nice to see a British family that are in

0:04:49.120 --> 0:04:53.040
<v Speaker 1>the spol that are functional and have good relationships, and

0:04:53.080 --> 0:04:55.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't begrudge them that, But Stacy, why do you

0:04:55.600 --> 0:04:56.560
<v Speaker 1>keep doing this to yourself?

0:04:56.600 --> 0:04:57.120
<v Speaker 3>Like sibling?

0:04:57.240 --> 0:04:59.760
<v Speaker 1>You looked at the sibling effect on a recent episode

0:05:00.000 --> 0:05:04.280
<v Speaker 1>and there are so many ways that siblings are romanticized

0:05:04.320 --> 0:05:06.320
<v Speaker 1>in culture, and we love to shine a light on them.

0:05:06.320 --> 0:05:09.000
<v Speaker 1>But for every Harry and Gemma styles, there is also

0:05:09.160 --> 0:05:10.839
<v Speaker 1>a Liam and Nol Gallagher.

0:05:10.880 --> 0:05:13.880
<v Speaker 4>So I don't think Liam and Nol Gallagher are worst

0:05:13.960 --> 0:05:18.680
<v Speaker 4>case scenario. They're like extremely successful musicians have given the

0:05:18.720 --> 0:05:23.120
<v Speaker 4>world like Greek gifts from their sibling relationship. Yeah.

0:05:23.240 --> 0:05:24.000
<v Speaker 3>I don't mean that.

0:05:24.120 --> 0:05:27.919
<v Speaker 1>I mean that their Di Siberant relationship probably is a

0:05:27.920 --> 0:05:29.320
<v Speaker 1>bit dysfunction.

0:05:28.960 --> 0:05:30.719
<v Speaker 6>Agree, but it did pretty underwall.

0:05:31.240 --> 0:05:34.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, true, true, so something good did come out of it.

0:05:34.520 --> 0:05:36.120
<v Speaker 2>And the other thing I want to bring up with

0:05:36.160 --> 0:05:38.479
<v Speaker 2>you guys this week that caught my eye was this

0:05:38.640 --> 0:05:41.320
<v Speaker 2>article in the Sydney Morning Herald about the fact that

0:05:41.360 --> 0:05:44.800
<v Speaker 2>Australian schools are now introducing codes of conduct not for

0:05:44.880 --> 0:05:49.360
<v Speaker 2>the students but for the parents because of bad behavior. Essentially,

0:05:49.400 --> 0:05:51.400
<v Speaker 2>the parents are meddling too much and they needed to

0:05:51.440 --> 0:05:54.279
<v Speaker 2>do something to fix this. So the headmaster of Barker

0:05:54.360 --> 0:05:57.120
<v Speaker 2>College in Sydney's North Shore spoke about how they're getting

0:05:57.160 --> 0:06:01.159
<v Speaker 2>all the parents to sign this charter basically agreeing to

0:06:01.600 --> 0:06:04.599
<v Speaker 2>behave themselves more because things have moved from what he

0:06:04.680 --> 0:06:09.240
<v Speaker 2>described as a parent teacher relationship into consumer behavior and

0:06:09.279 --> 0:06:11.599
<v Speaker 2>being like, I've paid for this and so this is

0:06:11.640 --> 0:06:14.760
<v Speaker 2>what I demand from you as a product. I thought

0:06:14.760 --> 0:06:18.240
<v Speaker 2>this was so interesting, talking about parents being passionate not

0:06:18.279 --> 0:06:22.120
<v Speaker 2>being the problem, the problem being that some parents resist

0:06:22.160 --> 0:06:25.640
<v Speaker 2>teachers authority over their children, but expect that that authority

0:06:25.720 --> 0:06:28.039
<v Speaker 2>is done to other children. It's kind of like, not

0:06:28.200 --> 0:06:30.599
<v Speaker 2>my kid, don't do that to my kid, but make

0:06:30.640 --> 0:06:32.680
<v Speaker 2>sure you're keeping all the other kids in line. I

0:06:32.680 --> 0:06:35.520
<v Speaker 2>thought that that was fascinating. Do you think this has

0:06:35.520 --> 0:06:38.560
<v Speaker 2>cotton so bad now or has it always been like this?

0:06:38.960 --> 0:06:42.360
<v Speaker 4>Oh? I think I'd take that principal's word for it.

0:06:42.440 --> 0:06:45.080
<v Speaker 4>That there's now this sense that schools are almost like

0:06:45.200 --> 0:06:48.840
<v Speaker 4>luxury hotels for a lot of parents. And there was

0:06:48.880 --> 0:06:53.080
<v Speaker 4>an article in the Australian Financial Review just recently about

0:06:53.120 --> 0:06:56.840
<v Speaker 4>how school fees are increasing at double the rate of

0:06:56.960 --> 0:07:00.680
<v Speaker 4>general inflation. This is obviously private school fees. Child started

0:07:00.720 --> 0:07:04.320
<v Speaker 4>at say a Geelong Grammar this year, you'll be up

0:07:04.480 --> 0:07:07.920
<v Speaker 4>for one point two million dollars over thirteen years of school.

0:07:08.000 --> 0:07:08.640
<v Speaker 6>So if you're.

0:07:08.520 --> 0:07:11.640
<v Speaker 4>Paying one point two million dollars, I guess you kind

0:07:11.680 --> 0:07:13.600
<v Speaker 4>of expect things to go your way and you want

0:07:13.600 --> 0:07:15.120
<v Speaker 4>the customer service to match.

0:07:15.320 --> 0:07:18.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, exactly. And the other thing I saw people talking

0:07:18.440 --> 0:07:23.080
<v Speaker 2>about was that now because of WhatsApp groups, Facebook school

0:07:23.080 --> 0:07:27.160
<v Speaker 2>Facebook groups, it being more instantaneous. There is this like

0:07:27.360 --> 0:07:30.480
<v Speaker 2>instant gratification from kind of sharing that publicly or making

0:07:30.480 --> 0:07:33.000
<v Speaker 2>the complaints publicly, and then it almost becomes like a

0:07:33.040 --> 0:07:35.880
<v Speaker 2>mob mentality of all. I've seen that parent complaining, so

0:07:35.960 --> 0:07:38.880
<v Speaker 2>now I'm going to complain about this, Like everyone's airing

0:07:38.920 --> 0:07:41.800
<v Speaker 2>their grievances more in a public square, whereas once upon

0:07:41.840 --> 0:07:43.880
<v Speaker 2>a time that would have been a meeting between you

0:07:43.960 --> 0:07:46.160
<v Speaker 2>and the teacher and that's the end of it. It's

0:07:46.880 --> 0:07:49.160
<v Speaker 2>so interesting to see it's spiraling to this point.

0:07:49.720 --> 0:07:51.160
<v Speaker 1>I just want to flip this for a second because

0:07:51.200 --> 0:07:53.320
<v Speaker 1>I saw something on Instagram that made my jaw drop,

0:07:53.360 --> 0:07:56.040
<v Speaker 1>and that doesn't happen so often these days. But there's

0:07:56.080 --> 0:07:59.600
<v Speaker 1>an Australian content creator comedian he must be a teacher.

0:07:59.640 --> 0:08:01.720
<v Speaker 1>He doesn't say that in his bio and his name's

0:08:01.720 --> 0:08:05.119
<v Speaker 1>Tyson Poppleston and he has this series where he reads

0:08:05.160 --> 0:08:09.200
<v Speaker 1>out emails from parents and he says, this series has

0:08:09.360 --> 0:08:11.680
<v Speaker 1>tens of millions of views, and he says, these are

0:08:11.680 --> 0:08:15.200
<v Speaker 1>all real emails that I'm getting from parents. He reads

0:08:15.240 --> 0:08:20.000
<v Speaker 1>them out, includes children's names, and I think that kind

0:08:20.000 --> 0:08:23.160
<v Speaker 1>of speaks as well to like the erosion of trust

0:08:23.320 --> 0:08:27.080
<v Speaker 1>between parents and schools that we have now. It's very

0:08:27.840 --> 0:08:32.800
<v Speaker 1>them versus us and not super constructive.

0:08:32.679 --> 0:08:35.480
<v Speaker 2>Because, as you say, if you're forking out big dollars,

0:08:35.559 --> 0:08:38.480
<v Speaker 2>be your kid to go somewhere, like you do kind

0:08:38.480 --> 0:08:40.959
<v Speaker 2>of have a leg to stand on right in wanting

0:08:40.960 --> 0:08:43.000
<v Speaker 2>to make sure that they're getting they're getting a good

0:08:43.120 --> 0:08:46.600
<v Speaker 2>education out of that. So I mean, where's the line.

0:08:47.000 --> 0:08:49.199
<v Speaker 1>There was a big story in the news this week,

0:08:49.320 --> 0:08:51.560
<v Speaker 1>but I don't want to talk about the story. I

0:08:51.600 --> 0:08:54.199
<v Speaker 1>want to talk about the media mechanics behind it. So

0:08:54.240 --> 0:08:58.719
<v Speaker 1>it's about Sam Kerr, who's Australia's best footballer, one of

0:08:58.760 --> 0:09:01.440
<v Speaker 1>the world's best footballers in fact, and this week, and

0:09:01.480 --> 0:09:03.880
<v Speaker 1>when I say football, I mean soccer for the Australians

0:09:04.960 --> 0:09:07.840
<v Speaker 1>and this week she signed the biggest contract of her career.

0:09:08.280 --> 0:09:11.040
<v Speaker 1>This is a deal worth millions of dollars and she's

0:09:11.080 --> 0:09:14.040
<v Speaker 1>got a World Cup on the horizon and it's probably

0:09:14.040 --> 0:09:16.640
<v Speaker 1>the biggest career chapter of her life. But the headline

0:09:16.679 --> 0:09:19.120
<v Speaker 1>that I saw was this. It was in the Herald

0:09:19.200 --> 0:09:22.720
<v Speaker 1>Sun and it was Sam Kerr reveals world Cup goal

0:09:23.200 --> 0:09:27.280
<v Speaker 1>and her surreal new life as a mum. And the

0:09:27.360 --> 0:09:30.240
<v Speaker 1>article is sort of framed a little bit around how

0:09:30.280 --> 0:09:33.559
<v Speaker 1>motherhood has changed her. Now you probably are thinking, oh,

0:09:33.600 --> 0:09:35.520
<v Speaker 1>I know where this is going, right. You're waiting for

0:09:35.559 --> 0:09:37.280
<v Speaker 1>me to say. Can you imagine if they wrote this

0:09:37.320 --> 0:09:39.600
<v Speaker 1>about a man like they would never write David Beckham

0:09:39.679 --> 0:09:44.520
<v Speaker 1>is soccer's best dad. And yes, that headline would never happen.

0:09:44.520 --> 0:09:48.200
<v Speaker 1>And that conversation is a real conversation, it's worth having.

0:09:48.200 --> 0:09:49.800
<v Speaker 1>But it's not what I want to talk about today.

0:09:50.320 --> 0:09:52.000
<v Speaker 1>I want to go somewhere different because I want to

0:09:52.000 --> 0:09:54.920
<v Speaker 1>talk about how the media uses motherhood to swing public

0:09:54.960 --> 0:09:55.760
<v Speaker 1>perception of women.

0:09:56.240 --> 0:09:58.040
<v Speaker 6>Oh are you with me? Are with me?

0:09:58.160 --> 0:10:02.160
<v Speaker 3>Does this sound horribly boring? Okay, because here's why. Here's why.

0:10:02.200 --> 0:10:04.679
<v Speaker 1>Here's my thesis. So Sam Kerr has had a pretty

0:10:04.679 --> 0:10:08.960
<v Speaker 1>tricky year publicly. She had an injury, a terrible injury,

0:10:09.120 --> 0:10:12.560
<v Speaker 1>she had time off the game. She was found not

0:10:12.720 --> 0:10:16.640
<v Speaker 1>guilty of racially aggravated harassment of a London police officer.

0:10:17.080 --> 0:10:19.920
<v Speaker 1>She was acquitted, she was cleared, it was done, but

0:10:20.040 --> 0:10:22.520
<v Speaker 1>the trial kind of ran her name through the ring

0:10:22.559 --> 0:10:25.480
<v Speaker 1>of a bit. And so now as she steps back

0:10:25.480 --> 0:10:29.520
<v Speaker 1>into the public frame, I was just really interested to

0:10:29.600 --> 0:10:33.200
<v Speaker 1>see the framing of this headline, not as like fierce

0:10:33.240 --> 0:10:36.520
<v Speaker 1>comeback queen, but as mum.

0:10:36.840 --> 0:10:38.679
<v Speaker 3>And now I'm not saying that Sam.

0:10:38.480 --> 0:10:42.199
<v Speaker 1>Kerr or her PR team are like purposely weaponizing motherhood

0:10:42.240 --> 0:10:44.000
<v Speaker 1>at all. I don't think that that's what she's doing,

0:10:44.520 --> 0:10:47.400
<v Speaker 1>but I just did want to take note of the

0:10:47.559 --> 0:10:51.480
<v Speaker 1>work that the word mum and motherhood is doing when

0:10:51.559 --> 0:10:53.800
<v Speaker 1>it gets attached to a woman like Sam Kerr. Here,

0:10:54.200 --> 0:10:57.440
<v Speaker 1>So I guess, I guess the question is this, like Amelia,

0:10:57.559 --> 0:11:01.640
<v Speaker 1>when a woman has a bad run of press or

0:11:03.040 --> 0:11:07.600
<v Speaker 1>a bad I don't know, reputation, Maybe a bad run

0:11:07.640 --> 0:11:09.480
<v Speaker 1>of press is probably the way to say it. Does

0:11:09.480 --> 0:11:13.280
<v Speaker 1>this pivot the kind of framing of motherhood smooth things

0:11:13.320 --> 0:11:14.440
<v Speaker 1>over and humanize them.

0:11:15.000 --> 0:11:17.360
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think that's a really interesting observation, And I

0:11:17.360 --> 0:11:20.679
<v Speaker 4>guess what you're saying, is that introducing the word mum

0:11:20.800 --> 0:11:24.920
<v Speaker 4>kind of at the very least changes the conversation with that,

0:11:25.040 --> 0:11:29.040
<v Speaker 4>like you know, blunts the sharp edges of a personality

0:11:29.320 --> 0:11:31.360
<v Speaker 4>or softens a woman's image in.

0:11:31.280 --> 0:11:32.160
<v Speaker 6>The public eye.

0:11:32.280 --> 0:11:35.400
<v Speaker 4>I thought immediately here of Angelina Jolie, because if you're

0:11:35.440 --> 0:11:38.679
<v Speaker 4>of a certain age, you're going to remember that Angelina

0:11:38.720 --> 0:11:42.240
<v Speaker 4>had a real wild child era that seems really dissonant

0:11:42.280 --> 0:11:45.120
<v Speaker 4>with how we think of her today as a humanitarian advocate.

0:11:45.200 --> 0:11:47.600
<v Speaker 4>So she used to wear her husband's blood around her

0:11:47.640 --> 0:11:50.360
<v Speaker 4>neck and a vial. She kissed her brother at an

0:11:50.400 --> 0:11:54.280
<v Speaker 4>award show. But it's been reported that around the year

0:11:54.280 --> 0:11:57.959
<v Speaker 4>two thousand, when she was filming tomb Rader in Cambodia,

0:11:58.040 --> 0:12:00.200
<v Speaker 4>her eyes were really open to the fact that were

0:12:00.280 --> 0:12:03.880
<v Speaker 4>children around the world living in extreme poverty. She saw

0:12:03.960 --> 0:12:08.040
<v Speaker 4>humanitarian crisis first hand. She became a global human rights advocate,

0:12:08.080 --> 0:12:10.680
<v Speaker 4>and she also became a mother. She adopted her son, Maddox,

0:12:10.720 --> 0:12:14.360
<v Speaker 4>shortly after that experience in two thousand and two, and

0:12:14.400 --> 0:12:17.880
<v Speaker 4>then thereafter I think we started to think of Angelina

0:12:18.000 --> 0:12:22.680
<v Speaker 4>Jolie totally differently from her nineties wild child roots.

0:12:23.280 --> 0:12:26.520
<v Speaker 6>So I guess what I'm wondering about.

0:12:26.760 --> 0:12:30.680
<v Speaker 4>Is is that always like a cynical pivot to say, like, look,

0:12:30.720 --> 0:12:32.520
<v Speaker 4>now I'm a mother, you don't get to ask me

0:12:32.559 --> 0:12:34.520
<v Speaker 4>about the blood I used to wear around my neck.

0:12:34.960 --> 0:12:40.040
<v Speaker 4>Or is it, in fact just that natural softening that

0:12:40.080 --> 0:12:42.960
<v Speaker 4>can occur when you have to look after someone who

0:12:43.040 --> 0:12:46.880
<v Speaker 4>is not you, when you do undergo change when you

0:12:47.000 --> 0:12:47.559
<v Speaker 4>become a mum.

0:12:48.000 --> 0:12:51.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I see what you're saying. Mon's about that. This

0:12:52.200 --> 0:12:54.440
<v Speaker 2>is you know, we could be cynical and say that

0:12:54.840 --> 0:12:58.079
<v Speaker 2>people are doing this to give someone a reputation overhaul.

0:12:58.280 --> 0:13:01.760
<v Speaker 2>But as you say, meals impossible not to change as

0:13:01.800 --> 0:13:03.000
<v Speaker 2>much as all of us say.

0:13:03.160 --> 0:13:04.600
<v Speaker 6>And I know that's dangerous ground.

0:13:04.760 --> 0:13:04.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:13:04.960 --> 0:13:05.840
<v Speaker 6>I don't want to say.

0:13:06.040 --> 0:13:09.680
<v Speaker 4>We're not saying here like mothers are inherently better, no

0:13:10.120 --> 0:13:12.480
<v Speaker 4>generous and thoughtful. We're just saying you change.

0:13:12.600 --> 0:13:14.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's it. It doesn't necessarily make you a good

0:13:14.920 --> 0:13:17.680
<v Speaker 2>person in any way, but you're kind of forced to

0:13:17.720 --> 0:13:20.160
<v Speaker 2>be a bit more selfless. You're forced to kind of

0:13:20.200 --> 0:13:23.160
<v Speaker 2>think about someone outside yourself. So it's natural that that

0:13:23.320 --> 0:13:26.320
<v Speaker 2>does change your perception of the world around you. And

0:13:26.400 --> 0:13:28.240
<v Speaker 2>there is kind of that softening, as much as we

0:13:28.360 --> 0:13:29.600
<v Speaker 2>kind of rail against it.

0:13:30.280 --> 0:13:34.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't agree, And I'll get to that in a minute,

0:13:34.280 --> 0:13:37.520
<v Speaker 1>because it's not always softening. Sometimes it works in the

0:13:37.559 --> 0:13:40.320
<v Speaker 1>other direction. But I think what I what you're talking

0:13:40.320 --> 0:13:41.959
<v Speaker 1>about is true, and I think two things can be

0:13:42.000 --> 0:13:44.160
<v Speaker 1>true at the same time. But what I'm talking about

0:13:44.200 --> 0:13:46.280
<v Speaker 1>is public perception, right, And I think if I was

0:13:46.320 --> 0:13:51.240
<v Speaker 1>advising someone on a comeback after a public scandal, like

0:13:51.280 --> 0:13:53.800
<v Speaker 1>there are a few well trodden paths in the pr playbook.

0:13:53.880 --> 0:13:57.320
<v Speaker 1>There's the motherhood path, there's the I've been to rehab

0:13:57.400 --> 0:13:59.280
<v Speaker 1>and sort it out my life and now I'm all

0:13:59.320 --> 0:14:01.760
<v Speaker 1>about wellness. Like, there's a few different scripts that you

0:14:01.800 --> 0:14:04.480
<v Speaker 1>can follow when it comes to a comeback story in

0:14:04.520 --> 0:14:08.560
<v Speaker 1>the public lens. The example most recently was from the

0:14:08.760 --> 0:14:12.040
<v Speaker 1>Call Her Daddy podcast with Alex Cooper. Now, she got

0:14:12.160 --> 0:14:15.920
<v Speaker 1>hit really recently with this Vanity Fair expose about a

0:14:15.960 --> 0:14:20.640
<v Speaker 1>toxic work environment and inappropriate behavior at her company, and

0:14:20.840 --> 0:14:25.480
<v Speaker 1>right in the middle of this scandal breaking, she announced

0:14:25.480 --> 0:14:30.800
<v Speaker 1>her pregnancy and her former boss, Dave Portno set it

0:14:30.840 --> 0:14:34.120
<v Speaker 1>on camera. He said, what a trump card, because now

0:14:34.160 --> 0:14:36.000
<v Speaker 1>you're off limits once you're pregnant.

0:14:36.280 --> 0:14:37.360
<v Speaker 3>All the hater's got a zipp it.

0:14:38.320 --> 0:14:41.240
<v Speaker 1>So and the other thing I was thinking about was

0:14:41.240 --> 0:14:45.040
<v Speaker 1>like historically, like Angelina Jolly is a great example, but

0:14:45.320 --> 0:14:48.960
<v Speaker 1>Paris Hilton's another one. Like she is fascinating and I

0:14:49.040 --> 0:14:50.800
<v Speaker 1>love Paris Hilton. I've got a lot of time for

0:14:50.840 --> 0:14:53.760
<v Speaker 1>Paris Hilton. But she came into the spotlight with a

0:14:53.800 --> 0:14:56.040
<v Speaker 1>sex tape. She I don't know if you how far

0:14:56.080 --> 0:14:58.040
<v Speaker 1>back you remember in the early noughties she kind of

0:14:58.040 --> 0:14:59.760
<v Speaker 1>had this part of girl era. She went to jail

0:14:59.800 --> 0:15:03.320
<v Speaker 1>for drink driving. She was arrested for possession of cocaine.

0:15:03.680 --> 0:15:07.760
<v Speaker 2>Remember roof Top with Rob Mills. That was an Australian

0:15:07.840 --> 0:15:08.640
<v Speaker 2>connection too.

0:15:08.920 --> 0:15:11.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, she told people to stop being poor, like she

0:15:12.200 --> 0:15:13.960
<v Speaker 1>was pretty universally hated.

0:15:14.920 --> 0:15:16.520
<v Speaker 3>Well it was hate or love.

0:15:17.360 --> 0:15:21.040
<v Speaker 1>And now she has two children and she's baking muffins

0:15:21.040 --> 0:15:23.720
<v Speaker 1>with them in her pink kitchen and it's she got

0:15:23.720 --> 0:15:28.400
<v Speaker 1>a hashtag, the Cutesy Crew, And it's just very very

0:15:28.440 --> 0:15:32.800
<v Speaker 1>interesting the way that motherhood can soften. So, I don't know,

0:15:32.840 --> 0:15:35.640
<v Speaker 1>I just feel like there's all this code, there's all

0:15:35.680 --> 0:15:37.640
<v Speaker 1>this code that comes with being a woman in the

0:15:37.680 --> 0:15:41.040
<v Speaker 1>public eye, and motherhood can either swing you you it

0:15:41.080 --> 0:15:44.040
<v Speaker 1>can either be used to swing you softer and more

0:15:44.120 --> 0:15:47.080
<v Speaker 1>palatable in the public's perception or the other way, like

0:15:47.120 --> 0:15:50.280
<v Speaker 1>more monstrous and bad.

0:15:50.520 --> 0:15:53.040
<v Speaker 2>I feel like the same is happening more and more

0:15:53.080 --> 0:15:56.000
<v Speaker 2>for men, though, particularly celebrity men in the public eye.

0:15:56.040 --> 0:15:58.920
<v Speaker 2>Like if I think about Hugh Grant's got five children,

0:15:58.920 --> 0:16:01.720
<v Speaker 2>and I definitely think that a lot to rehabilitate. I mean,

0:16:01.760 --> 0:16:06.160
<v Speaker 2>he's still kind of a curmudgeon, but to rehabilitate our

0:16:06.200 --> 0:16:08.840
<v Speaker 2>opinions of him, Like Matt Damon was just on red

0:16:08.880 --> 0:16:11.640
<v Speaker 2>carpets for his movie The Odyssey with his four daughters,

0:16:11.840 --> 0:16:14.360
<v Speaker 2>Like people do wheel out their kids at times that

0:16:14.400 --> 0:16:17.920
<v Speaker 2>are kind of convenient for them to soften that perception

0:16:18.000 --> 0:16:20.680
<v Speaker 2>of them or to endear them to people. So I

0:16:20.720 --> 0:16:23.720
<v Speaker 2>do feel like it's coming more in for the dads

0:16:24.120 --> 0:16:26.160
<v Speaker 2>as well, that that becomes so much a part of

0:16:26.160 --> 0:16:26.680
<v Speaker 2>their brand.

0:16:27.360 --> 0:16:29.960
<v Speaker 1>Do you think though with dads? Like I hear what

0:16:30.000 --> 0:16:32.040
<v Speaker 1>you're saying, and I agree. I think it's really true

0:16:32.400 --> 0:16:35.880
<v Speaker 1>that dads are using fatherhood to brand them as wholesome

0:16:36.600 --> 0:16:40.880
<v Speaker 1>and palatable and a good all rounder guy. But can

0:16:40.920 --> 0:16:42.680
<v Speaker 1>we just for a moment talk about the brad pit

0:16:42.720 --> 0:16:44.680
<v Speaker 1>of this all. I was trying to think of examples

0:16:44.720 --> 0:16:46.800
<v Speaker 1>in the last five years of men who have had

0:16:46.880 --> 0:16:50.280
<v Speaker 1>major reputational problems, and Brad Pitt's an obvious one. And

0:16:50.360 --> 0:16:53.520
<v Speaker 1>he did this big comeback story in Vogue, this huge

0:16:53.560 --> 0:16:57.240
<v Speaker 1>spread and the p R playbook. There had nothing to

0:16:57.280 --> 0:17:02.040
<v Speaker 1>do with fatherhood. It was all about wellness and sobriety

0:17:02.440 --> 0:17:06.400
<v Speaker 1>and also how incredibly hot he still looks at his age.

0:17:06.280 --> 0:17:09.520
<v Speaker 6>But that's partly because his children doesn't speak to me.

0:17:09.720 --> 0:17:12.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's irreparable for him. He would use those children

0:17:12.840 --> 0:17:15.760
<v Speaker 2>if he could, I'm sure, but they have literally erased

0:17:15.840 --> 0:17:18.520
<v Speaker 2>him from their lives and from their names. They are

0:17:18.520 --> 0:17:21.040
<v Speaker 2>no longer pits. They are just Jolie.

0:17:21.200 --> 0:17:23.080
<v Speaker 4>I think it's sort of like, if you have the

0:17:23.119 --> 0:17:26.840
<v Speaker 4>tool at your disposal, a Matt Damon, then you use it.

0:17:27.160 --> 0:17:29.000
<v Speaker 4>But if you don't, then you've got to pivot hard

0:17:29.000 --> 0:17:30.600
<v Speaker 4>into your jewelry designer girlfriend.

0:17:30.760 --> 0:17:32.120
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, that's Brad Pitt's case.

0:17:32.280 --> 0:17:32.680
<v Speaker 2>Exactly.

0:17:32.720 --> 0:17:35.040
<v Speaker 3>What did Matt Damon do? Remind me?

0:17:35.359 --> 0:17:39.960
<v Speaker 4>He went big onto advertising crypto platforms, like he.

0:17:40.000 --> 0:17:43.240
<v Speaker 2>Was completely forgot about that. He must because of the kids.

0:17:43.440 --> 0:17:47.679
<v Speaker 4>People thought was really disappointing. Yeah, and also gambling ads.

0:17:47.840 --> 0:17:50.200
<v Speaker 4>But I think the kids did a lot of work.

0:17:50.359 --> 0:17:52.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, and I think he he is just seen

0:17:52.760 --> 0:17:55.400
<v Speaker 2>as one of those wholesome, you know, celeb dads.

0:17:55.600 --> 0:17:57.280
<v Speaker 3>I think I don't want to.

0:17:57.400 --> 0:17:59.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think it's a good point, but I think

0:17:59.720 --> 0:18:02.000
<v Speaker 1>it feels like for men, and I might be wrong here,

0:18:02.080 --> 0:18:03.560
<v Speaker 1>but it feels to me like an add on to

0:18:03.600 --> 0:18:07.800
<v Speaker 1>their brand. Like I'm talking about serious reputational rehab here.

0:18:08.040 --> 0:18:10.840
<v Speaker 1>Like no one is going to write an article saying

0:18:11.119 --> 0:18:17.879
<v Speaker 1>Locky Neil's Surreal New Life as a single dat. For women,

0:18:17.920 --> 0:18:21.560
<v Speaker 1>it's weaponized in both ways. You're either like the martyr

0:18:21.760 --> 0:18:24.359
<v Speaker 1>or the monster. And for men, I just think that

0:18:24.520 --> 0:18:26.760
<v Speaker 1>they get much. They just use it as kind of

0:18:26.760 --> 0:18:27.680
<v Speaker 1>like a branding add on.

0:18:28.880 --> 0:18:31.040
<v Speaker 4>And out Louder has a dilemma for us, which she

0:18:31.119 --> 0:18:34.600
<v Speaker 4>posted in the Outlauder's Facebook group out Louders, am I

0:18:34.680 --> 0:18:38.040
<v Speaker 4>clutching my pearls here? I feel like every week at

0:18:38.040 --> 0:18:40.880
<v Speaker 4>my child's soccer, instead of walking to the bathroom, more

0:18:40.920 --> 0:18:44.920
<v Speaker 4>and more boys are just taking bush we The thing

0:18:44.960 --> 0:18:48.199
<v Speaker 4>that makes me irritated is everyone thinks it's okay. The

0:18:48.240 --> 0:18:50.959
<v Speaker 4>thing that makes me irritated is everyone thinks it's okay.

0:18:51.040 --> 0:18:53.199
<v Speaker 4>I'm guessing as the parents allow it, but if the

0:18:53.240 --> 0:18:56.040
<v Speaker 4>girls did it, they're being uproar and all the girls

0:18:56.080 --> 0:18:59.720
<v Speaker 4>have to trudge themselves to the bathroom every time I

0:18:59.760 --> 0:19:02.800
<v Speaker 4>want my daughter to the toilets. She's a preschooler. All

0:19:02.840 --> 0:19:04.840
<v Speaker 4>the boys have just nipped into the bush, and I

0:19:05.080 --> 0:19:07.640
<v Speaker 4>just think it is unfair and also a bit gross,

0:19:08.080 --> 0:19:10.760
<v Speaker 4>so I make my son, who is actually playing, walk

0:19:10.800 --> 0:19:15.520
<v Speaker 4>to the bathroom. I might be being over dramatic, though, Stacy.

0:19:16.080 --> 0:19:20.080
<v Speaker 2>Such a good dilemma because it is different rules for

0:19:20.200 --> 0:19:23.440
<v Speaker 2>boys and girls, and it shouldn't be that way. Look,

0:19:23.480 --> 0:19:26.280
<v Speaker 2>I think just because you can pee in the bush

0:19:26.359 --> 0:19:29.520
<v Speaker 2>without wetting your pant leg doesn't mean you should, and

0:19:29.560 --> 0:19:31.800
<v Speaker 2>it's I think it is setting a bad example if

0:19:31.840 --> 0:19:33.680
<v Speaker 2>you're just letting your boys trot off and do that

0:19:33.800 --> 0:19:35.639
<v Speaker 2>when girls have to go all the way over to

0:19:35.720 --> 0:19:39.600
<v Speaker 2>the bathroom. But equally, I'm kind of sympathetic to the

0:19:39.680 --> 0:19:41.840
<v Speaker 2>parents too, because I know that there is nothing more

0:19:41.880 --> 0:19:45.520
<v Speaker 2>annoying and that and worse timing than a kid who

0:19:45.520 --> 0:19:48.000
<v Speaker 2>needs to weak like it's always at the most annoying.

0:19:48.240 --> 0:19:51.679
<v Speaker 4>I'm gonna push you for a verdict, though, what should happen.

0:19:53.840 --> 0:19:56.000
<v Speaker 2>I think the boys should stop doing the bushways. To

0:19:56.040 --> 0:19:58.280
<v Speaker 2>be honest, I think the boys should stop doing the bushways.

0:19:58.640 --> 0:20:01.520
<v Speaker 2>I think you can do it like at home or

0:20:01.560 --> 0:20:03.600
<v Speaker 2>wherever if you're at But when you're at a home,

0:20:04.680 --> 0:20:08.360
<v Speaker 2>well you know, in your backyard, like fine, like it's

0:20:08.359 --> 0:20:10.439
<v Speaker 2>your own space. But I think if you're at an

0:20:10.480 --> 0:20:12.639
<v Speaker 2>organized sport and there's a bathroom available, you should be

0:20:12.640 --> 0:20:16.160
<v Speaker 2>going to it. Bushwee's worst case scenario on Yeah.

0:20:16.200 --> 0:20:19.280
<v Speaker 1>I think the top comments on this were mum of

0:20:19.359 --> 0:20:21.320
<v Speaker 1>three here for old enough to play team sports, they're

0:20:21.320 --> 0:20:24.200
<v Speaker 1>old enough to use the toilet. And from Mel who says,

0:20:24.280 --> 0:20:27.119
<v Speaker 1>I'm a teacher and we are finding some of the

0:20:27.119 --> 0:20:30.520
<v Speaker 1>boys do this outside when they're playing, far from the bathrooms.

0:20:31.080 --> 0:20:33.240
<v Speaker 1>That's five year olds and up that are doing this,

0:20:33.280 --> 0:20:36.840
<v Speaker 1>that are doing bushweed's at school. What that's not okay?

0:20:37.000 --> 0:20:37.800
<v Speaker 3>It's not okay.

0:20:38.000 --> 0:20:39.520
<v Speaker 2>What do you think about it?

0:20:39.840 --> 0:20:40.880
<v Speaker 6>You're not going to like it?

0:20:41.040 --> 0:20:42.600
<v Speaker 2>You're a bit more lass, you're okay.

0:20:42.720 --> 0:20:46.840
<v Speaker 4>I think, Look, we're talking about preschoolers and we're not yakout.

0:20:46.840 --> 0:20:47.440
<v Speaker 2>That is true.

0:20:48.400 --> 0:20:50.760
<v Speaker 6>With those two facts established.

0:20:51.160 --> 0:20:54.120
<v Speaker 4>I think I think the girls can do bushweeze too.

0:20:54.520 --> 0:20:56.639
<v Speaker 3>Oh yeah, girls can do bushweeds.

0:20:58.359 --> 0:21:02.720
<v Speaker 2>I've never successfully done are in my life. Corse stress, Well,

0:21:02.760 --> 0:21:06.040
<v Speaker 2>that is what I'm lacking, evidently, because I've never successfully

0:21:06.600 --> 0:21:08.640
<v Speaker 2>who has a lot of corese drink pre school four

0:21:08.680 --> 0:21:11.480
<v Speaker 2>year olds exactly like for days.

0:21:12.280 --> 0:21:14.680
<v Speaker 1>You have to teach them these life skills now, Stacy,

0:21:14.760 --> 0:21:16.760
<v Speaker 1>because soon they're going to be a teenager. Your daughter

0:21:16.760 --> 0:21:19.280
<v Speaker 1>will be a teenager. She'll be in her early twenties.

0:21:19.320 --> 0:21:21.160
<v Speaker 1>She'll be out drinking with her friends. She'll be walking

0:21:21.160 --> 0:21:22.679
<v Speaker 1>home from the pub. She won't know what to do.

0:21:23.200 --> 0:21:25.479
<v Speaker 1>She needs to be out of pop a squat in

0:21:25.520 --> 0:21:28.440
<v Speaker 1>the gutter. It is a right of Australian passage and

0:21:28.800 --> 0:21:29.520
<v Speaker 1>it needs to be.

0:21:29.480 --> 0:21:31.200
<v Speaker 2>Taught from a young age. But I'm going to bring

0:21:31.240 --> 0:21:33.560
<v Speaker 2>in the tall factor here, Mon's. I don't know whether

0:21:33.600 --> 0:21:36.920
<v Speaker 2>you feel this way. That is a big altitude drop down.

0:21:37.119 --> 0:21:39.600
<v Speaker 2>Oh you are a six foot two woman down to

0:21:39.680 --> 0:21:41.120
<v Speaker 2>doing a squad that's fine.

0:21:41.200 --> 0:21:44.880
<v Speaker 4>Sorry, that's a lot of the pre schoolers to you, Stacy.

0:21:44.960 --> 0:21:48.560
<v Speaker 4>I'm not advocating you the bushweeze. I'm saying pre school

0:21:48.600 --> 0:21:50.679
<v Speaker 4>girl and boys can do bushwheeze.

0:21:50.760 --> 0:21:54.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, okay, your last bushwee Amelia.

0:21:54.960 --> 0:21:58.960
<v Speaker 4>Oh look, I don't do bushwheeze, but people I know

0:21:59.600 --> 0:22:05.240
<v Speaker 4>who maybe of preschool or thereabouts age, enjoy a bushwee

0:22:05.320 --> 0:22:05.960
<v Speaker 4>every now and then.

0:22:06.040 --> 0:22:08.840
<v Speaker 2>So we're saying five and below bush wee till your

0:22:08.840 --> 0:22:14.480
<v Speaker 2>heart's content five enough, probably go to the Okay, we

0:22:14.640 --> 0:22:15.920
<v Speaker 2>solved the fertilizer.

0:22:16.520 --> 0:22:18.959
<v Speaker 1>F YI, there's a woman on Instagram who has an

0:22:19.000 --> 0:22:21.399
<v Speaker 1>online course, like a short course on how to teach

0:22:21.440 --> 0:22:23.280
<v Speaker 1>women to we standing up?

0:22:23.400 --> 0:22:25.439
<v Speaker 2>What Yeah, I like it.

0:22:25.440 --> 0:22:27.760
<v Speaker 3>It's all in the public higher algorithm.

0:22:27.840 --> 0:22:30.080
<v Speaker 4>That's exactly the sort of thing I would expect you

0:22:30.160 --> 0:22:31.080
<v Speaker 4>for you page to be.

0:22:31.000 --> 0:22:33.760
<v Speaker 2>Said that and Christmas Tree.

0:22:34.800 --> 0:22:39.359
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, from bodily functions to swearing, parenting out loud covers

0:22:39.400 --> 0:22:41.840
<v Speaker 4>all the taboos. I want to talk about curse words

0:22:41.880 --> 0:22:44.440
<v Speaker 4>because there was a headline I read this week that was.

0:22:44.560 --> 0:22:47.080
<v Speaker 1>With herse words, who says curse with are you an

0:22:47.160 --> 0:22:49.000
<v Speaker 1>English lady in a manner?

0:22:50.359 --> 0:22:50.960
<v Speaker 3>Curse words?

0:22:50.960 --> 0:22:53.480
<v Speaker 6>I'm just trying to come up with synonyms for sweet.

0:22:53.560 --> 0:22:55.560
<v Speaker 2>We're just trying to bring the tone up after saying

0:22:55.600 --> 0:22:56.879
<v Speaker 2>that kids should do bush.

0:22:57.480 --> 0:23:03.439
<v Speaker 4>That's the headline was that music with explicit lyrics is

0:23:03.480 --> 0:23:06.640
<v Speaker 4>in decline, and it draws in a report that found

0:23:06.720 --> 0:23:10.360
<v Speaker 4>the share of explicit songs in Spotify's top fifty has

0:23:10.520 --> 0:23:14.800
<v Speaker 4>fallen sharply in recent years. Now. As a nineties kid,

0:23:14.800 --> 0:23:18.080
<v Speaker 4>I remember the moral panic around song lyrics. It was

0:23:18.119 --> 0:23:22.919
<v Speaker 4>really and they were sort of presented as like naughty

0:23:23.000 --> 0:23:26.479
<v Speaker 4>lyrics were presented as the ultimate societal problem. So it

0:23:26.520 --> 0:23:28.920
<v Speaker 4>feels really curious to me that this is no longer

0:23:28.960 --> 0:23:31.280
<v Speaker 4>something I need to worry about. It's just gone. And

0:23:31.320 --> 0:23:33.960
<v Speaker 4>it got me thinking about where we are with swearing

0:23:34.040 --> 0:23:37.760
<v Speaker 4>as parents. It's a really divisive issue. So I did

0:23:37.760 --> 0:23:40.800
<v Speaker 4>some research in the picture is actually a little bit complicated. Yes,

0:23:40.920 --> 0:23:43.840
<v Speaker 4>swearing has gone down in music and also movies and TV.

0:23:44.840 --> 0:23:47.040
<v Speaker 4>One article I read pointed out that in Back to

0:23:47.080 --> 0:23:50.280
<v Speaker 4>the Future, which is a PG film, one character says

0:23:50.320 --> 0:23:55.200
<v Speaker 4>holy shit, and according to today's ratings, you couldn't get

0:23:55.320 --> 0:23:57.240
<v Speaker 4>the PG rating if someone said.

0:23:57.080 --> 0:23:58.280
<v Speaker 2>That, I've said that, okay.

0:23:59.280 --> 0:24:01.280
<v Speaker 4>At the same time, though, the grumpy old lady on

0:24:01.320 --> 0:24:04.000
<v Speaker 4>the bus complaining about the school kids is correct in

0:24:04.040 --> 0:24:07.399
<v Speaker 4>that kids are swearing more. That's not just in your imagination,

0:24:07.560 --> 0:24:09.679
<v Speaker 4>and they're learning to swear at an earlier age, like

0:24:09.720 --> 0:24:12.080
<v Speaker 4>around two or three, whereas in the nineties it was

0:24:12.119 --> 0:24:17.159
<v Speaker 4>around four or five time, and experts attribute the rise

0:24:17.200 --> 0:24:21.439
<v Speaker 4>in casual swearing to you guessed it, social media, because

0:24:21.440 --> 0:24:24.359
<v Speaker 4>people on social media are saying stuff like WTF and

0:24:24.400 --> 0:24:28.160
<v Speaker 4>the incorporating very casual use of swear. Words, and then

0:24:28.200 --> 0:24:30.680
<v Speaker 4>that's sort of got these knock on effects for kids.

0:24:31.080 --> 0:24:32.680
<v Speaker 6>Okay, so those are all the facts.

0:24:32.680 --> 0:24:34.880
<v Speaker 4>It's a complicated picture, But I want to know how

0:24:34.960 --> 0:24:40.919
<v Speaker 4>we should feel about this new landscape of swearing. Stacy,

0:24:41.119 --> 0:24:43.720
<v Speaker 4>you strike me as a very cool mum. Are you

0:24:43.840 --> 0:24:46.960
<v Speaker 4>one of those like permissive parents who thinks that swearing

0:24:47.080 --> 0:24:47.840
<v Speaker 4>isn't a big deal.

0:24:48.000 --> 0:24:51.879
<v Speaker 2>I don't know where you got that idea, but I

0:24:52.520 --> 0:24:55.160
<v Speaker 2>do think it's a big deal. Like if I was choosing,

0:24:55.720 --> 0:24:58.560
<v Speaker 2>I don't want my child to be swearing here, there

0:24:58.600 --> 0:25:01.440
<v Speaker 2>and everywhere. I do kind of find it funny when

0:25:01.560 --> 0:25:04.320
<v Speaker 2>kids do it, though, But I'm trying to figure out

0:25:04.320 --> 0:25:08.000
<v Speaker 2>where I sit because I do wonder whether if we

0:25:08.040 --> 0:25:11.000
<v Speaker 2>took more of the European approach to alcohol, you know

0:25:11.000 --> 0:25:13.439
<v Speaker 2>how they just, you know, let their kids have a

0:25:13.480 --> 0:25:15.399
<v Speaker 2>sip of wine at the table and it's not a

0:25:15.400 --> 0:25:17.760
<v Speaker 2>big deal. Like if it's just kind of not out

0:25:17.840 --> 0:25:21.120
<v Speaker 2>of reach and it's not seen as this sparse thing,

0:25:21.240 --> 0:25:23.760
<v Speaker 2>then our kids will be less interested in it. Be

0:25:23.800 --> 0:25:27.280
<v Speaker 2>like you're allowed to use bloody yes, Like if you

0:25:27.440 --> 0:25:30.400
<v Speaker 2>stubbed your toe on the lounge and you said, oh shit,

0:25:31.160 --> 0:25:32.720
<v Speaker 2>that's not the worst thing in the world. To me,

0:25:33.040 --> 0:25:35.000
<v Speaker 2>but I think there's a time and a place like

0:25:35.520 --> 0:25:38.440
<v Speaker 2>I think yes, but no I'm not. It's not something

0:25:38.520 --> 0:25:41.240
<v Speaker 2>that I've ever been super restricted with. But I haven't

0:25:41.280 --> 0:25:44.080
<v Speaker 2>crossed that bridge yet, so once, once it starts to happen,

0:25:44.119 --> 0:25:46.080
<v Speaker 2>I may then feel differently about it.

0:25:46.280 --> 0:25:51.680
<v Speaker 4>Mons, do you call bushweese bush pisses around you?

0:25:51.680 --> 0:25:51.840
<v Speaker 2>No?

0:25:51.920 --> 0:25:53.640
<v Speaker 3>We call them fucking bushes.

0:25:55.920 --> 0:26:00.399
<v Speaker 1>When in terms of swearing, So, when I was a kid, Tessa,

0:26:00.480 --> 0:26:01.840
<v Speaker 1>you're going to have to bleep this, but I'm not

0:26:01.840 --> 0:26:02.320
<v Speaker 1>going to bleep.

0:26:02.400 --> 0:26:03.560
<v Speaker 3>Okay, I'm going to just say it.

0:26:04.200 --> 0:26:07.160
<v Speaker 1>When I was a kid, we as a family were

0:26:07.240 --> 0:26:10.199
<v Speaker 1>leaving a family event and all of us were in

0:26:10.200 --> 0:26:13.760
<v Speaker 1>the car, all six of us, and my brother saw

0:26:14.359 --> 0:26:18.040
<v Speaker 1>his school friends walking along the footpath and he wound

0:26:18.119 --> 0:26:21.640
<v Speaker 1>it down his window as kids do, and he put

0:26:21.680 --> 0:26:24.520
<v Speaker 1>his head out of the window and the wind blowing

0:26:24.520 --> 0:26:27.879
<v Speaker 1>in his hair, he yelled out to them.

0:26:27.600 --> 0:26:33.360
<v Speaker 3>Hey, how old was he? He would have been twelve

0:26:33.440 --> 0:26:33.960
<v Speaker 3>or thirteen.

0:26:35.400 --> 0:26:41.359
<v Speaker 1>My dad drove the car off the road and we

0:26:41.600 --> 0:26:45.480
<v Speaker 1>got the verbal thrashing of a lifetime. I have never

0:26:45.880 --> 0:26:48.480
<v Speaker 1>seen my parents react to anything the way that they

0:26:48.520 --> 0:26:51.439
<v Speaker 1>reacted to that, and the prevailing message to me, who

0:26:51.520 --> 0:26:56.359
<v Speaker 1>was probably nine years old, sitting in the backseat, was Ah,

0:26:56.440 --> 0:26:58.720
<v Speaker 1>there are levels to swearing.

0:26:58.880 --> 0:27:01.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, because I'd never seen them react like that before.

0:27:02.000 --> 0:27:04.640
<v Speaker 3>So level one.

0:27:04.720 --> 0:27:07.160
<v Speaker 1>So this is the point, is that he knew it

0:27:07.200 --> 0:27:09.879
<v Speaker 1>was He's not picking up that word from TV or

0:27:09.920 --> 0:27:10.760
<v Speaker 1>from the radio.

0:27:11.080 --> 0:27:12.200
<v Speaker 3>He heard that.

0:27:12.320 --> 0:27:14.680
<v Speaker 1>He certainly didn't hear that word at home. He heard

0:27:14.720 --> 0:27:17.119
<v Speaker 1>it probably in the school yard, and he probably didn't

0:27:17.160 --> 0:27:20.080
<v Speaker 1>realize the weight of what it carried, but he didn't know.

0:27:20.240 --> 0:27:22.520
<v Speaker 1>He just knew that it was a bad word, but

0:27:22.640 --> 0:27:24.320
<v Speaker 1>he didn't know the severity of it.

0:27:24.680 --> 0:27:26.640
<v Speaker 3>And so that's when at that point I was like.

0:27:26.640 --> 0:27:29.280
<v Speaker 1>Yes, there are tears to swearing here, and I think

0:27:29.320 --> 0:27:31.600
<v Speaker 1>I sort of follow that rule in our home, like

0:27:31.760 --> 0:27:40.040
<v Speaker 1>level one. Yeah, oh hell, heck, damn god, damn it,

0:27:40.119 --> 0:27:47.280
<v Speaker 1>damn it god. Maybe level two is your shits and

0:27:47.320 --> 0:27:50.760
<v Speaker 1>your fucks. Level three is what my brother did that day,

0:27:50.960 --> 0:27:53.880
<v Speaker 1>and level three will never ever be repeated.

0:27:55.160 --> 0:27:57.800
<v Speaker 3>So but what's interesting.

0:27:57.440 --> 0:27:59.720
<v Speaker 1>Is that we have this kind of I was watching

0:28:00.040 --> 0:28:00.800
<v Speaker 1>I was watching.

0:28:00.560 --> 0:28:05.040
<v Speaker 4>Office Romance back with the wind out windows, because that

0:28:05.119 --> 0:28:07.399
<v Speaker 4>also took me back in time, wind down windows.

0:28:07.480 --> 0:28:09.879
<v Speaker 6>It took him a while to wind it down, and

0:28:09.920 --> 0:28:12.080
<v Speaker 6>then when it's finally wound down to the bottom.

0:28:12.240 --> 0:28:13.159
<v Speaker 2>He lets read it.

0:28:14.720 --> 0:28:17.560
<v Speaker 1>Was the shame we all burned in the back seat

0:28:17.560 --> 0:28:21.000
<v Speaker 1>with shame for him, and he did too. But then

0:28:21.280 --> 0:28:23.479
<v Speaker 1>then I was watching Office Romance the other night on

0:28:23.480 --> 0:28:25.800
<v Speaker 1>Netflix with j Loo and Brett Goldstein, and there is

0:28:25.840 --> 0:28:30.119
<v Speaker 1>an entire segment about sword where it's said about sixteen times.

0:28:30.200 --> 0:28:32.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, definitely, how times have changed.

0:28:32.520 --> 0:28:34.919
<v Speaker 1>But look, I think there's this what's interesting. There's this

0:28:35.000 --> 0:28:36.959
<v Speaker 1>weird trend at the moment, this sort of like public

0:28:37.000 --> 0:28:39.320
<v Speaker 1>facing version of my brother in the back seat where

0:28:40.160 --> 0:28:41.880
<v Speaker 1>it's called the swearing challenge.

0:28:41.880 --> 0:28:42.520
<v Speaker 3>Have you seen this?

0:28:42.560 --> 0:28:47.200
<v Speaker 1>It's on sort of TikTok and Instagram where parents will

0:28:47.200 --> 0:28:51.880
<v Speaker 1>set up their phone in the room and say, now, darling,

0:28:51.920 --> 0:28:54.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm going out for you get one minute and you

0:28:54.840 --> 0:28:57.880
<v Speaker 1>get to get all the swearing out of your system. Okay,

0:28:58.240 --> 0:29:01.440
<v Speaker 1>you just absolutely go for it. Okay, no one's here,

0:29:01.560 --> 0:29:02.320
<v Speaker 1>no one's listening.

0:29:02.680 --> 0:29:04.800
<v Speaker 6>It's just psychologists approved.

0:29:04.880 --> 0:29:06.480
<v Speaker 4>Or is it just like a thing people are doing

0:29:06.480 --> 0:29:09.200
<v Speaker 4>for clout, Like, what is the sort of therapeutic benefit

0:29:09.280 --> 0:29:09.880
<v Speaker 4>of this.

0:29:10.080 --> 0:29:14.880
<v Speaker 1>Zero therapeutic benefit complete content Vickory. Yeah, an engagement metrics.

0:29:14.920 --> 0:29:17.000
<v Speaker 1>And because it's sixty seconds, you stay and you watch

0:29:17.040 --> 0:29:19.320
<v Speaker 1>the entire video, and then your algorithm feeds you more

0:29:19.320 --> 0:29:19.880
<v Speaker 1>of these things.

0:29:19.960 --> 0:29:20.840
<v Speaker 3>So here's an.

0:29:20.720 --> 0:29:23.800
<v Speaker 1>Example of one that has twenty one million views.

0:29:23.960 --> 0:29:26.360
<v Speaker 4>Okay, you have one minute to say any bad words

0:29:26.400 --> 0:29:28.280
<v Speaker 4>you want and you won't get in trouble.

0:29:28.520 --> 0:29:30.640
<v Speaker 2>But you can only say this one minute in the bathroom.

0:29:30.680 --> 0:29:40.720
<v Speaker 7>Okay, Okay, how stupid, hideous, idious?

0:29:43.440 --> 0:29:44.480
<v Speaker 6>I know, mons.

0:29:44.840 --> 0:29:47.280
<v Speaker 4>I feel like I want to present the case that

0:29:47.440 --> 0:29:51.680
<v Speaker 4>is becoming an increasingly popular position amongst parents for why

0:29:51.840 --> 0:29:54.680
<v Speaker 4>swearing is not a big deal. Now that's it's personally

0:29:54.680 --> 0:29:58.080
<v Speaker 4>not what I feel, but I want to present there

0:29:58.160 --> 0:30:00.960
<v Speaker 4>please might of the argument. So there was an ABC

0:30:01.240 --> 0:30:05.280
<v Speaker 4>article that interviewed various experts who attested to the fact

0:30:05.320 --> 0:30:09.959
<v Speaker 4>that swearing is part of the Australian definition of self.

0:30:10.080 --> 0:30:13.840
<v Speaker 4>It is UnAustralian not to let your children swear. That's

0:30:13.880 --> 0:30:16.320
<v Speaker 4>the first point. Second point they made is that it

0:30:16.360 --> 0:30:19.000
<v Speaker 4>can be used as a cudgel to kind of ostracize

0:30:19.080 --> 0:30:21.560
<v Speaker 4>vulnerable groups. Like if you make swearing out to be

0:30:21.600 --> 0:30:24.920
<v Speaker 4>a really big deal, you're essentially kind of like creating

0:30:25.000 --> 0:30:27.560
<v Speaker 4>a class marker. You're saying we're better than a lot

0:30:27.560 --> 0:30:31.000
<v Speaker 4>of other people, and that is not actually accurate. It's

0:30:31.040 --> 0:30:35.000
<v Speaker 4>just sort of like a mannerism that you've declared unacceptable.

0:30:36.440 --> 0:30:38.800
<v Speaker 4>And then there's been this state of opinion articles by

0:30:38.880 --> 0:30:42.560
<v Speaker 4>mums who allow swearing in the home, and what it

0:30:42.600 --> 0:30:44.719
<v Speaker 4>comes down to for them is that they feel it

0:30:44.800 --> 0:30:49.160
<v Speaker 4>creates a more honest channel of communication between parents and

0:30:49.240 --> 0:30:52.600
<v Speaker 4>children because you're focusing on emotions not words, and they

0:30:52.680 --> 0:30:55.680
<v Speaker 4>say it leads to calmer interactions because kids can you know,

0:30:55.800 --> 0:30:59.400
<v Speaker 4>kids don't necessarily have an adult vocabulary. They're trying to

0:30:59.440 --> 0:31:02.920
<v Speaker 4>reach for the words that most accurately describe how they're feeling.

0:31:03.480 --> 0:31:06.040
<v Speaker 4>And to sort of fixate on certain words as not

0:31:06.200 --> 0:31:11.320
<v Speaker 4>appropriate or to get irrationally angry about kids using those

0:31:11.360 --> 0:31:14.720
<v Speaker 4>words makes the kids scared to communicate in general. So

0:31:14.840 --> 0:31:17.120
<v Speaker 4>the argument goes, are we convinced by any of that?

0:31:18.320 --> 0:31:22.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm not, no, but I am convinced by something Stacey

0:31:22.400 --> 0:31:25.240
<v Speaker 1>said earlier about stubbing the toe and swearing, And because

0:31:25.280 --> 0:31:28.920
<v Speaker 1>I do think in our house we treat swearing as circumstantial,

0:31:29.000 --> 0:31:29.440
<v Speaker 1>is okay.

0:31:29.840 --> 0:31:32.600
<v Speaker 3>And here's the scientific backing. Stay with me.

0:31:32.680 --> 0:31:34.720
<v Speaker 1>There was a study in the UK right where these

0:31:34.720 --> 0:31:36.920
<v Speaker 1>researchers said, we're going to get people to put their

0:31:36.960 --> 0:31:40.440
<v Speaker 1>hands in a bucket of ice like cold, icy water,

0:31:41.040 --> 0:31:43.240
<v Speaker 1>and they said to half of them, you're allowed to

0:31:43.320 --> 0:31:45.960
<v Speaker 1>swear your head head off, Like the challenge is how

0:31:45.960 --> 0:31:48.120
<v Speaker 1>long can you keep your hand in the water. Half

0:31:48.120 --> 0:31:50.560
<v Speaker 1>of you you can go bananas, choose whatever swear word

0:31:50.640 --> 0:31:53.120
<v Speaker 1>you want. And then the other half of the people

0:31:53.160 --> 0:31:55.920
<v Speaker 1>they said, you're only allowed to say the word brown

0:31:56.480 --> 0:32:01.200
<v Speaker 1>or square, right, just words. People that were allowed to

0:32:01.200 --> 0:32:04.200
<v Speaker 1>swear their heads off kept their hand in the bucket

0:32:04.240 --> 0:32:07.080
<v Speaker 1>for up to two times longer than the people they.

0:32:06.960 --> 0:32:09.120
<v Speaker 4>Didn't, because there's some like when I have to put

0:32:09.120 --> 0:32:10.240
<v Speaker 4>my hand in a bucket of ice.

0:32:10.880 --> 0:32:14.479
<v Speaker 1>Yes it is, but it's this like stress release if

0:32:14.520 --> 0:32:16.800
<v Speaker 1>there is a stress release effect on the brain when

0:32:16.800 --> 0:32:19.400
<v Speaker 1>you swear. So I think in our house circumstantial swearing

0:32:19.480 --> 0:32:22.080
<v Speaker 1>is fine. Just no rolling the car window down.

0:32:22.440 --> 0:32:24.600
<v Speaker 4>Am I allowed to just put on my Karen hat

0:32:24.640 --> 0:32:27.520
<v Speaker 4>for a second. I know it was the term Karen,

0:32:27.800 --> 0:32:31.000
<v Speaker 4>but I'm reclaiming it and I'm about to be a

0:32:31.120 --> 0:32:34.920
<v Speaker 4>grumpy middle aged lady complaining. Remember, the millennial version is Jessica,

0:32:35.000 --> 0:32:37.400
<v Speaker 4>So you Jessica, allow me to be a Jessica for

0:32:37.440 --> 0:32:42.600
<v Speaker 4>a second. I am shocked by the adults who think

0:32:42.720 --> 0:32:44.600
<v Speaker 4>it is okay in public to be.

0:32:44.680 --> 0:32:50.120
<v Speaker 6>Just casually using quite I asay's here two slash three

0:32:50.520 --> 0:32:55.280
<v Speaker 6>levels swears out front of children on buses, walking down

0:32:55.360 --> 0:32:57.160
<v Speaker 6>the street, in line at a shop.

0:32:57.880 --> 0:32:59.880
<v Speaker 4>You don't need to reach for the swear word because

0:32:59.880 --> 0:33:01.400
<v Speaker 4>you've got a limited vocabulary.

0:33:01.600 --> 0:33:03.680
<v Speaker 6>Use a word that doesn't involve a swear word. You're

0:33:03.720 --> 0:33:04.880
<v Speaker 6>an adult. You can do it.

0:33:05.120 --> 0:33:07.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, exactly, that's it. I think it's all about

0:33:07.760 --> 0:33:10.200
<v Speaker 2>the appropriate spot for that. And when there's little kids

0:33:10.240 --> 0:33:12.440
<v Speaker 2>around you that aren't yours, then maybe you need to

0:33:12.640 --> 0:33:14.800
<v Speaker 2>like pull it back to a tier one.

0:33:15.080 --> 0:33:18.520
<v Speaker 1>Oh, you just need to use it as a teachable moment,

0:33:19.280 --> 0:33:22.600
<v Speaker 1>teachable moment, a little gentle parenting moment for you, merelya

0:33:22.720 --> 0:33:27.360
<v Speaker 1>you say, hmm, that man was having some big feelings.

0:33:27.960 --> 0:33:29.840
<v Speaker 6>And the actually.

0:33:31.320 --> 0:33:34.920
<v Speaker 1>While calling you a level three swear All right, it

0:33:35.000 --> 0:33:38.480
<v Speaker 1>is time to talk about recommendations. And this part of

0:33:38.520 --> 0:33:40.400
<v Speaker 1>the show we love because we go out there in

0:33:40.440 --> 0:33:42.920
<v Speaker 1>the world, we try things, we buy things, and then

0:33:42.920 --> 0:33:44.480
<v Speaker 1>we bring them back to you. We're like a squirrel

0:33:44.560 --> 0:33:50.120
<v Speaker 1>bringing you back nuts, saying, try this delicious morsel, Stacey,

0:33:50.280 --> 0:33:50.800
<v Speaker 1>what have you got?

0:33:50.840 --> 0:33:52.080
<v Speaker 3>What have you been off? You've been off in the

0:33:52.080 --> 0:33:52.880
<v Speaker 3>wilderness for a week.

0:33:53.720 --> 0:33:55.480
<v Speaker 2>I have I mean I was mostly held all over

0:33:55.520 --> 0:33:58.800
<v Speaker 2>my laptop looking at pictures non existent pictures of tailors.

0:33:58.840 --> 0:34:01.560
<v Speaker 2>Were sweating. But the thing that I bought this is

0:34:01.600 --> 0:34:03.760
<v Speaker 2>my first. I think this is our first double reco

0:34:04.160 --> 0:34:07.680
<v Speaker 2>on the show. I am recalling something that Amelia reco

0:34:07.840 --> 0:34:10.839
<v Speaker 2>that I then went and bought music and it has

0:34:10.920 --> 0:34:14.319
<v Speaker 2>been such a hit me what is it? Okay? So

0:34:14.400 --> 0:34:18.240
<v Speaker 2>it's the Mikadoor color and learn the table cloth color

0:34:18.320 --> 0:34:22.719
<v Speaker 2>in twenty five bucks. They're in Spotlight or Amazon, I

0:34:22.719 --> 0:34:26.000
<v Speaker 2>think from the from the actual website as well, and

0:34:26.160 --> 0:34:29.200
<v Speaker 2>I just laid it out on our dining table. My

0:34:29.360 --> 0:34:32.560
<v Speaker 2>daughter loved it. But then over the weekend we had

0:34:32.600 --> 0:34:35.600
<v Speaker 2>like various groups of friends or whatever come over and

0:34:35.680 --> 0:34:39.800
<v Speaker 2>everyone kids and adults like would just PLoP down coloring

0:34:39.880 --> 0:34:40.920
<v Speaker 2>a little thing and move on.

0:34:41.440 --> 0:34:45.200
<v Speaker 4>Help you stress relieve as you were, yes doing Taylor coverage.

0:34:45.239 --> 0:34:46.919
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I think it actually did.

0:34:46.960 --> 0:34:49.160
<v Speaker 2>And then I heard my daughter explaining to one of

0:34:49.160 --> 0:34:51.799
<v Speaker 2>her friends and you know what, this just goes in

0:34:51.800 --> 0:34:54.000
<v Speaker 2>the washing machine and then we can start it again.

0:34:54.239 --> 0:34:57.439
<v Speaker 2>She just thinks it's the greatest thing ever. So yeah,

0:34:57.520 --> 0:34:59.400
<v Speaker 2>fig it double double reco.

0:35:00.320 --> 0:35:00.560
<v Speaker 6>Happy.

0:35:00.640 --> 0:35:02.480
<v Speaker 2>And then I also ordered two more because I'm going

0:35:02.520 --> 0:35:04.400
<v Speaker 2>to give them to people for birthday presents or Christmas

0:35:04.440 --> 0:35:06.080
<v Speaker 2>presents because I'm not uganized.

0:35:07.080 --> 0:35:08.680
<v Speaker 3>Yes, really that is organized.

0:35:08.840 --> 0:35:10.680
<v Speaker 1>Starting your Christmas shopping already, Stacy.

0:35:10.719 --> 0:35:13.799
<v Speaker 2>I'm so proud that you should have known you'd be

0:35:13.800 --> 0:35:14.520
<v Speaker 2>proud of me for that.

0:35:14.800 --> 0:35:15.040
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:35:15.040 --> 0:35:17.360
<v Speaker 2>That's also my other reco is now I've started to

0:35:17.360 --> 0:35:19.879
<v Speaker 2>find if I really like something for my daughter, I'm

0:35:19.920 --> 0:35:23.040
<v Speaker 2>just buying two so that those school party things that

0:35:23.120 --> 0:35:25.479
<v Speaker 2>come up then you're not having to go and buy

0:35:25.560 --> 0:35:27.880
<v Speaker 2>for those at that time. So, yeah, that's my reco.

0:35:28.320 --> 0:35:29.280
<v Speaker 2>What's yours? Amelia?

0:35:29.400 --> 0:35:32.360
<v Speaker 4>Love that my reco this week is sitting on the floor.

0:35:33.239 --> 0:35:34.319
<v Speaker 2>I love doing that too.

0:35:35.080 --> 0:35:37.759
<v Speaker 4>It comes from a substack newsletter I love, which I

0:35:37.800 --> 0:35:40.680
<v Speaker 4>guess I'm also recommending. The subset newsletter is called how

0:35:40.719 --> 0:35:44.880
<v Speaker 4>to Move, and it's by a certified personal trainer and

0:35:45.000 --> 0:35:49.000
<v Speaker 4>Pilate's teacher called Anna Maltby. What I love about the

0:35:49.000 --> 0:35:52.879
<v Speaker 4>newsletter is she's body neutral in her approach, which means

0:35:52.880 --> 0:35:54.840
<v Speaker 4>you're never gonna get diet tips. In fact, she's not

0:35:55.040 --> 0:35:58.040
<v Speaker 4>talking about your body and how it looks at all.

0:35:58.200 --> 0:36:02.200
<v Speaker 4>She's focused on functional movement and fitness. So a recent

0:36:02.239 --> 0:36:04.600
<v Speaker 4>newsletter had the subject line, maybe you should sit on

0:36:04.640 --> 0:36:07.719
<v Speaker 4>the floor, and I thought, maybe I should, And she

0:36:07.840 --> 0:36:10.279
<v Speaker 4>explains that, yes, sitting on the floor can be uncomfortable,

0:36:10.760 --> 0:36:13.200
<v Speaker 4>but also there's lots of benefits to doing it. It helps

0:36:13.200 --> 0:36:16.000
<v Speaker 4>with mobility, It encourages small movements because you're having to

0:36:16.040 --> 0:36:21.200
<v Speaker 4>adjust over time, and it can ultimately ease little aches

0:36:21.239 --> 0:36:24.719
<v Speaker 4>and pains because you're kind of figuring out, like how

0:36:24.760 --> 0:36:27.440
<v Speaker 4>your body works in the asymmetry of your body as you.

0:36:27.440 --> 0:36:28.280
<v Speaker 6>Sit on the floor.

0:36:28.880 --> 0:36:31.920
<v Speaker 4>So it is a way that parents can be doing

0:36:31.920 --> 0:36:36.160
<v Speaker 4>something good for their bodies very easily because you're constantly

0:36:36.200 --> 0:36:37.759
<v Speaker 4>sitting on the floor with kids, and then it's a

0:36:37.760 --> 0:36:39.720
<v Speaker 4>way to sort of recast it in your brain away

0:36:39.760 --> 0:36:43.359
<v Speaker 4>from this is uncomfortable and it sucks to maybe it's

0:36:43.400 --> 0:36:44.319
<v Speaker 4>doing something good for me.

0:36:44.920 --> 0:36:46.520
<v Speaker 2>It's just a shame that when you get up from

0:36:46.560 --> 0:36:47.719
<v Speaker 2>the floor you have to make that.

0:36:47.800 --> 0:36:51.799
<v Speaker 6>Ooh noise That is a legal requirement.

0:36:51.960 --> 0:36:53.879
<v Speaker 2>Yes, the nothing I can do about that, but yeah,

0:36:53.960 --> 0:36:55.120
<v Speaker 2>great love it.

0:36:55.200 --> 0:36:58.400
<v Speaker 1>Mine is have either of you ever harbored a desire

0:36:58.520 --> 0:36:59.920
<v Speaker 1>to be a play school presenter?

0:37:01.520 --> 0:37:04.200
<v Speaker 2>I don't think I have the certain.

0:37:06.960 --> 0:37:08.359
<v Speaker 3>No way.

0:37:09.360 --> 0:37:11.279
<v Speaker 4>You never watched it and thought I was Oh no,

0:37:11.360 --> 0:37:14.000
<v Speaker 4>I loved playschool, but Benita, I'm sorry.

0:37:14.160 --> 0:37:15.120
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, God, I can't.

0:37:15.200 --> 0:37:19.080
<v Speaker 2>Absolute goddess could never compare. Clearly you have, yes.

0:37:19.760 --> 0:37:21.000
<v Speaker 3>I thought everyone did.

0:37:22.239 --> 0:37:24.480
<v Speaker 1>This is the closest you'll get to it. So the

0:37:24.560 --> 0:37:28.440
<v Speaker 1>ABC have just done this week an Australian story about

0:37:28.480 --> 0:37:32.759
<v Speaker 1>play School and how it's made sixty years sixty years

0:37:32.760 --> 0:37:34.439
<v Speaker 1>of play School, and so they go back in time

0:37:34.480 --> 0:37:36.400
<v Speaker 1>and they talk about how they made it in the

0:37:36.440 --> 0:37:38.960
<v Speaker 1>start and what it is now and it's, oh my god,

0:37:38.960 --> 0:37:42.600
<v Speaker 1>it's so wholesome and beautiful, and they talked so many

0:37:42.600 --> 0:37:43.960
<v Speaker 1>things I want to tell you about it. It was just

0:37:44.000 --> 0:37:46.719
<v Speaker 1>like amazing. The best part is where they take you

0:37:46.760 --> 0:37:49.280
<v Speaker 1>into like the workshop, how they make all the props

0:37:49.320 --> 0:37:52.640
<v Speaker 1>on the set, and how it's just like the world's

0:37:52.719 --> 0:37:56.640
<v Speaker 1>largest collection of toilet rolls basically, and how they deliberately

0:37:56.719 --> 0:38:00.439
<v Speaker 1>make all the stuff on play School is deliberately made

0:38:00.560 --> 0:38:02.359
<v Speaker 1>so that you can look in your own recycle bin

0:38:02.480 --> 0:38:05.000
<v Speaker 1>and be like, I could do that. That's so great,

0:38:05.239 --> 0:38:08.279
<v Speaker 1>so great. And the other thing I learned is that

0:38:09.160 --> 0:38:12.400
<v Speaker 1>they do this thing called the play School pass. I

0:38:12.400 --> 0:38:14.640
<v Speaker 1>don't know you you would have seen it, but it's

0:38:14.640 --> 0:38:16.760
<v Speaker 1>got a name. It's where they talk down the barrel

0:38:16.800 --> 0:38:20.360
<v Speaker 1>of the camera and then they passed to the next presenter,

0:38:20.640 --> 0:38:23.640
<v Speaker 1>so it would be like this, So for anyone watching

0:38:23.680 --> 0:38:27.800
<v Speaker 1>on YouTube or Apple podcasts, I'm going to do it, Amelia.

0:38:27.800 --> 0:38:30.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to pass to you, okay, so get ready, okay, okay.

0:38:30.920 --> 0:38:33.200
<v Speaker 1>So what you have to do, Amelia is put your

0:38:33.239 --> 0:38:36.000
<v Speaker 1>head to the side because I'm about to pass to you. Ready,

0:38:36.320 --> 0:38:38.279
<v Speaker 1>And then I look down the barrel and I do this.

0:38:38.440 --> 0:38:42.560
<v Speaker 1>I go thanks for spending time with me. Let's go

0:38:42.600 --> 0:38:43.839
<v Speaker 1>and see what Amelia is up to.

0:38:45.280 --> 0:38:45.560
<v Speaker 2>Home.

0:38:45.640 --> 0:38:53.040
<v Speaker 1>Mon's it's a place, Mon's.

0:38:53.080 --> 0:38:55.439
<v Speaker 4>I have a question because my kids were a place

0:38:55.480 --> 0:38:59.040
<v Speaker 4>college when we were not living in Australia and didn't have.

0:38:59.040 --> 0:38:59.880
<v Speaker 6>Access to iView.

0:39:00.360 --> 0:39:03.560
<v Speaker 4>Is it still cutting through for kids who used to

0:39:03.719 --> 0:39:06.360
<v Speaker 4>weigh more bells and whistles in their children's entertainment?

0:39:06.400 --> 0:39:07.680
<v Speaker 6>Do you think they.

0:39:07.520 --> 0:39:08.120
<v Speaker 2>Talk about that.

0:39:08.200 --> 0:39:11.200
<v Speaker 1>They talk about how shows are so fast now and

0:39:11.239 --> 0:39:15.600
<v Speaker 1>they deliberately slow things down, and how it's very deliberate,

0:39:15.640 --> 0:39:18.600
<v Speaker 1>how the hosts will ask a question and then pause

0:39:19.160 --> 0:39:21.399
<v Speaker 1>so that kids at home can answer it, like it's

0:39:21.400 --> 0:39:25.319
<v Speaker 1>all very thoughtfully done. But the interesting thing is like

0:39:26.200 --> 0:39:28.520
<v Speaker 1>they talk about how they're really cognizant of it, but

0:39:28.800 --> 0:39:31.480
<v Speaker 1>it has changed from back in the day, like it

0:39:31.600 --> 0:39:34.759
<v Speaker 1>used to be filmed in one thirty minute block, right,

0:39:34.800 --> 0:39:36.680
<v Speaker 1>so if the actors made a mistake, they just had

0:39:36.680 --> 0:39:38.960
<v Speaker 1>to kind of like try and cover it up. But

0:39:39.120 --> 0:39:43.480
<v Speaker 1>now it chops and changes and it's a lot brighter colors,

0:39:43.560 --> 0:39:47.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot more movement in it, and the place will

0:39:47.640 --> 0:39:50.480
<v Speaker 1>pass sort of acts as that while we're still this

0:39:50.520 --> 0:39:52.080
<v Speaker 1>is still a continuous show.

0:39:52.200 --> 0:39:56.359
<v Speaker 4>But yeah, I think is your slow viewing. But our kids,

0:39:56.360 --> 0:39:59.120
<v Speaker 4>I'm still watching and responding to it given all the

0:39:59.160 --> 0:39:59.840
<v Speaker 4>other stimuli.

0:40:00.080 --> 0:40:01.120
<v Speaker 6>How available to them?

0:40:01.440 --> 0:40:04.160
<v Speaker 1>Yes they are, they are. And there's some crazy stat

0:40:04.160 --> 0:40:06.200
<v Speaker 1>that Lee Sales talked about how four out of five

0:40:06.360 --> 0:40:08.759
<v Speaker 1>kids in Australia have watched places.

0:40:08.800 --> 0:40:09.480
<v Speaker 6>It's so great.

0:40:10.200 --> 0:40:12.200
<v Speaker 3>Yes, it's a great hope.

0:40:12.560 --> 0:40:13.840
<v Speaker 1>All right, Well that is all we have time for

0:40:13.920 --> 0:40:15.120
<v Speaker 1>this week in Parenting Out Loud.

0:40:15.680 --> 0:40:16.880
<v Speaker 3>Have a great week.

0:40:17.480 --> 0:40:20.560
<v Speaker 1>We will see you back here next Saturday morning or

0:40:20.600 --> 0:40:22.560
<v Speaker 1>on along the weekend or whenever you listen to us.

0:40:22.600 --> 0:40:23.680
<v Speaker 3>Thanks for spending time with us.

0:40:24.920 --> 0:40:27.799
<v Speaker 1>Mummy acknowledges the traditional owners of the land on which

0:40:27.840 --> 0:40:29.200
<v Speaker 1>we have recorded this podcast