WEBVTT - Inside The Mind Of A Sexual Predator

0:00:11.542 --> 0:00:15.502
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to a Mother and Mia podcast. MoMA Mia

0:00:15.622 --> 0:00:19.422
<v Speaker 1>acknowledges the traditional owners of land and waters. This podcast

0:00:19.622 --> 0:00:28.382
<v Speaker 1>was recorded on It's nine p thirty pm on a

0:00:28.462 --> 0:00:31.902
<v Speaker 1>muggy spring night in Sydney. And you're walking home from

0:00:31.902 --> 0:00:35.542
<v Speaker 1>a friend's house. You're still a good fifteen minutes away

0:00:35.582 --> 0:00:39.862
<v Speaker 1>and just starting to feel nervous. Your sense you're being followed.

0:00:40.182 --> 0:00:44.102
<v Speaker 1>In fact, you know you are in the shadows. About

0:00:44.142 --> 0:00:48.182
<v Speaker 1>twenty meters behind you is a man. As you walk faster,

0:00:48.342 --> 0:00:51.462
<v Speaker 1>so does he. The hair prickles on the back of

0:00:51.462 --> 0:00:53.782
<v Speaker 1>your neck and you quickly cross the road, trying to

0:00:53.822 --> 0:00:58.422
<v Speaker 1>put some distance between you. It doesn't work. He has

0:00:58.462 --> 0:01:00.902
<v Speaker 1>crossed the road as well, and now he's closing in.

0:01:01.902 --> 0:01:05.382
<v Speaker 1>What do you do? Keep walking and hope for the best,

0:01:06.422 --> 0:01:09.902
<v Speaker 1>stop and wait for him to walk past. Just ignore

0:01:09.942 --> 0:01:13.182
<v Speaker 1>the whole city and tell yourself to stop being so paranoid,

0:01:14.342 --> 0:01:17.302
<v Speaker 1>or actually accept that you might be in danger and

0:01:17.342 --> 0:01:22.422
<v Speaker 1>do something constructive, something that studies have proven could very

0:01:22.462 --> 0:01:34.342
<v Speaker 1>well save your life. I'm Jemma Bath and this is

0:01:34.382 --> 0:01:38.982
<v Speaker 1>True Crime Conversations Amoma mea podcast exploring the world's most

0:01:39.022 --> 0:01:42.382
<v Speaker 1>notorious crimes by speaking to the people who know the

0:01:42.422 --> 0:01:45.862
<v Speaker 1>most about them. If you were to ask Brent Sanders,

0:01:46.102 --> 0:01:49.862
<v Speaker 1>doing something constructive is the only answer to that scenario

0:01:49.902 --> 0:01:53.822
<v Speaker 1>you just heard. In his experience, this situation is not

0:01:54.062 --> 0:01:58.422
<v Speaker 1>likely to be anything other than sexually motivated. Brent is

0:01:58.462 --> 0:02:02.062
<v Speaker 1>a former police officer who was deployed in riot control

0:02:02.062 --> 0:02:05.942
<v Speaker 1>and did extensive work investigating rapes and studying the methods

0:02:05.942 --> 0:02:10.702
<v Speaker 1>and psychology of rapists. For the last thirty years, he

0:02:10.782 --> 0:02:14.742
<v Speaker 1>has dedicated his career to sex crime education. He has

0:02:14.782 --> 0:02:17.622
<v Speaker 1>provided more than a million people with the tools and

0:02:17.662 --> 0:02:20.982
<v Speaker 1>mindset to both protect themselves in a violent or escalating

0:02:20.982 --> 0:02:25.222
<v Speaker 1>situation or avoid one altogether. He also wants his students,

0:02:25.262 --> 0:02:28.102
<v Speaker 1>who are mainly young women and girls, to know how

0:02:28.142 --> 0:02:31.382
<v Speaker 1>the law works, to know what the legal definitions for

0:02:31.462 --> 0:02:35.422
<v Speaker 1>consent and drunkenness are, and to know where to physically

0:02:35.462 --> 0:02:40.262
<v Speaker 1>strike someone if you find yourself in danger. Brent lives

0:02:40.342 --> 0:02:43.502
<v Speaker 1>and breathes this world. When he's not teaching high school

0:02:43.582 --> 0:02:47.982
<v Speaker 1>kids about life choices, he's hosting his own podcast, Crime Insiders.

0:02:48.582 --> 0:02:59.742
<v Speaker 1>Brent joins us, Now, Brent, take me back to the

0:02:59.782 --> 0:03:02.822
<v Speaker 1>start of your career. Was being a cop everything you

0:03:02.862 --> 0:03:03.542
<v Speaker 1>thought it would be?

0:03:03.942 --> 0:03:05.982
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, look it was. I joined the police. When I

0:03:05.982 --> 0:03:08.542
<v Speaker 2>was nineteen, I was a kid. I was the youngest

0:03:08.542 --> 0:03:12.582
<v Speaker 2>recruit in the academy, so I graduated as the youngest

0:03:12.902 --> 0:03:15.102
<v Speaker 2>police officer in the country. I was in New Zealand,

0:03:15.822 --> 0:03:19.302
<v Speaker 2>and if you told me back then that I would

0:03:19.382 --> 0:03:22.662
<v Speaker 2>end up doing what I do now, million miles away

0:03:22.702 --> 0:03:23.702
<v Speaker 2>from where my head was.

0:03:24.662 --> 0:03:27.862
<v Speaker 1>What did your experience in the police force teach you

0:03:27.902 --> 0:03:33.502
<v Speaker 1>about male violence and male sexual violence, particularly towards women.

0:03:34.422 --> 0:03:36.622
<v Speaker 2>You know, in the police you don't just specifically work

0:03:36.662 --> 0:03:40.182
<v Speaker 2>in that environment, but it certainly comes up a lot.

0:03:40.502 --> 0:03:43.502
<v Speaker 2>I worked in a lot of very confrontational environments in

0:03:43.542 --> 0:03:45.582
<v Speaker 2>the gangs. I was in the right police dealing with

0:03:45.662 --> 0:03:48.902
<v Speaker 2>gangs and always around the fringes of that. You're very

0:03:48.902 --> 0:03:52.622
<v Speaker 2>aware of high degrees of violence within those environments towards women.

0:03:53.302 --> 0:03:57.022
<v Speaker 2>Sex crimes only really became a specialized area of policing

0:03:57.062 --> 0:03:59.542
<v Speaker 2>in Australia New Zealand sort of late eighties, early nineties,

0:03:59.622 --> 0:04:02.662
<v Speaker 2>which is wild. It is it's hard to believe that now,

0:04:02.702 --> 0:04:07.342
<v Speaker 2>But that also sort of coincided with more awareness around

0:04:07.342 --> 0:04:10.062
<v Speaker 2>criminal profiling, and that's sort of what put me on

0:04:10.062 --> 0:04:13.862
<v Speaker 2>a little bit of a pathway to learning more about that.

0:04:14.102 --> 0:04:16.462
<v Speaker 2>And it was a bit of a sliding door moment

0:04:16.502 --> 0:04:19.902
<v Speaker 2>where I was approached having done a talk on profiling

0:04:19.902 --> 0:04:23.542
<v Speaker 2>and sexual crime here in Australia, I was approached by

0:04:23.542 --> 0:04:26.502
<v Speaker 2>a woman from the Education department. This is in nineteen

0:04:26.622 --> 0:04:29.102
<v Speaker 2>ninety five, this is a long time ago. I remember.

0:04:29.142 --> 0:04:32.022
<v Speaker 2>She came up with this big sort of Manila envelope.

0:04:32.342 --> 0:04:34.022
<v Speaker 2>Wasn't even much in the way of emailing and things

0:04:34.062 --> 0:04:36.382
<v Speaker 2>such as that, and she said, look, we're looking to

0:04:36.422 --> 0:04:39.542
<v Speaker 2>team up with somebody with your background who could possibly

0:04:39.582 --> 0:04:42.542
<v Speaker 2>help us put some courses together to go into schools

0:04:43.022 --> 0:04:47.462
<v Speaker 2>and raise awareness around sexual crime, consent that type of thing.

0:04:47.902 --> 0:04:50.142
<v Speaker 2>And she sort of gave me this very heavy envelope

0:04:50.142 --> 0:04:52.342
<v Speaker 2>and I took it away. I had a look at

0:04:52.342 --> 0:04:54.702
<v Speaker 2>and I thought, you know, that maybe something I could

0:04:55.262 --> 0:04:58.542
<v Speaker 2>contribute to. But that was sort of the springboard from

0:04:58.902 --> 0:05:01.422
<v Speaker 2>taking some leave from the police. I did my last

0:05:01.462 --> 0:05:04.582
<v Speaker 2>talk on sexual crime this morning to two hundred boys

0:05:04.582 --> 0:05:08.022
<v Speaker 2>at a boys school in Blacktown. So when I started,

0:05:08.702 --> 0:05:12.062
<v Speaker 2>weirdly the education part only wanted me to talk to

0:05:12.822 --> 0:05:17.902
<v Speaker 2>young women, not boys, which to me was always quite bizarre.

0:05:18.222 --> 0:05:21.102
<v Speaker 2>And then trying to get into schools as a male

0:05:21.262 --> 0:05:24.822
<v Speaker 2>police officer at that time, I came up against a

0:05:24.822 --> 0:05:29.382
<v Speaker 2>heap of resistance from groups who felt that they didn't

0:05:29.382 --> 0:05:33.062
<v Speaker 2>want a male talking to females about this stuff. I

0:05:33.182 --> 0:05:36.542
<v Speaker 2>had situations where I had people physically trying to stop

0:05:36.582 --> 0:05:38.942
<v Speaker 2>me get into a hall to speak to girls because

0:05:38.942 --> 0:05:40.662
<v Speaker 2>I was a male. So you know, there was a

0:05:40.662 --> 0:05:43.222
<v Speaker 2>little bit of resistance there, but I knew where that

0:05:43.302 --> 0:05:45.302
<v Speaker 2>was coming from. It was coming from a good place.

0:05:45.342 --> 0:05:47.862
<v Speaker 2>It wasn't against me so much. It was more like, well,

0:05:49.022 --> 0:05:52.742
<v Speaker 2>it hadn't been done before. We didn't have ex coppers

0:05:52.782 --> 0:05:56.022
<v Speaker 2>walking into schools and speaking to students about sexual crime.

0:05:56.502 --> 0:05:58.502
<v Speaker 2>So when I first started doing it, a lot of

0:05:58.542 --> 0:06:01.422
<v Speaker 2>schools weren't interested. They just wouldn't touch it. And the

0:06:01.462 --> 0:06:03.622
<v Speaker 2>first school that got me in in Australia was actually

0:06:03.662 --> 0:06:06.982
<v Speaker 2>a private girls school in North Sydney, and because they

0:06:07.582 --> 0:06:10.422
<v Speaker 2>are a little bit more autonomous where the state schools

0:06:10.502 --> 0:06:13.982
<v Speaker 2>were going, well where have you been before? And anyway,

0:06:14.262 --> 0:06:16.862
<v Speaker 2>that school that got me in, I've been back there

0:06:16.902 --> 0:06:20.862
<v Speaker 2>every year for twenty nine years. So after a couple

0:06:20.862 --> 0:06:23.342
<v Speaker 2>of years, the Education department said, oh, we can't just

0:06:23.422 --> 0:06:27.502
<v Speaker 2>have you speaking to girls, and I'm going, well, yeah, okay,

0:06:27.622 --> 0:06:30.542
<v Speaker 2>probably smart. So I started speaking to boys. I speak

0:06:30.582 --> 0:06:32.902
<v Speaker 2>to as many young men as I do young women.

0:06:33.862 --> 0:06:35.662
<v Speaker 1>Can you give us an overview of what that looks like.

0:06:35.742 --> 0:06:38.822
<v Speaker 1>Do you have men in one group that you speak

0:06:38.862 --> 0:06:41.982
<v Speaker 1>to women separately? Are they all together and what are

0:06:42.022 --> 0:06:42.822
<v Speaker 1>you teaching them?

0:06:43.342 --> 0:06:45.782
<v Speaker 2>Used to be separate in so much as that the

0:06:45.782 --> 0:06:48.622
<v Speaker 2>coed schools that I was going into started saying, well, look,

0:06:48.662 --> 0:06:50.742
<v Speaker 2>we want you to talk to the boys, but it

0:06:50.782 --> 0:06:52.862
<v Speaker 2>was sort of never, well, we want a cab and

0:06:52.902 --> 0:06:55.822
<v Speaker 2>copy of the girls session, because the session was originally

0:06:55.862 --> 0:06:58.702
<v Speaker 2>designed for young women, because that's what the brief was.

0:06:59.302 --> 0:07:02.662
<v Speaker 2>So when I started talking to young boys, I wanted

0:07:02.702 --> 0:07:05.382
<v Speaker 2>to talk about the same content, but I also wanted

0:07:05.382 --> 0:07:08.582
<v Speaker 2>there to be a specific difference, and so I wanted

0:07:08.622 --> 0:07:12.102
<v Speaker 2>to talk to the boys around choice, consequence, around peer pressure,

0:07:12.142 --> 0:07:16.462
<v Speaker 2>around heartbeat decisions, how they can change your life, and

0:07:16.502 --> 0:07:18.942
<v Speaker 2>a little bit of that was sort of going back

0:07:18.982 --> 0:07:20.622
<v Speaker 2>to some of the troubles I got into as a

0:07:20.662 --> 0:07:23.902
<v Speaker 2>young guy. So I spoke to boys about that. Now

0:07:23.942 --> 0:07:27.622
<v Speaker 2>more frequently they're combined, which I think is good. I

0:07:27.742 --> 0:07:29.662
<v Speaker 2>just ticked over a million students that have gone through

0:07:29.702 --> 0:07:31.902
<v Speaker 2>my talk, so I speak to about thirty thousand, forty

0:07:31.942 --> 0:07:35.142
<v Speaker 2>thousand a year, as many young men as young women.

0:07:36.102 --> 0:07:39.782
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious to hear how the boys in particular react

0:07:40.662 --> 0:07:42.702
<v Speaker 1>when you give them all of this information. What do

0:07:42.742 --> 0:07:44.462
<v Speaker 1>they say to you? What questions do they ask you?

0:07:44.742 --> 0:07:47.222
<v Speaker 2>They ask the same questions the girls do, to be fair,

0:07:47.222 --> 0:07:50.102
<v Speaker 2>but often maybe from a slight different perspective. Back in

0:07:50.142 --> 0:07:52.142
<v Speaker 2>the day, a lot of the girls' schools I was

0:07:52.182 --> 0:07:56.222
<v Speaker 2>going into my presentation went all day. Now I pretty

0:07:56.262 --> 0:07:58.782
<v Speaker 2>much do a presentation which is a couple of hours long,

0:07:59.422 --> 0:08:03.502
<v Speaker 2>year ten, eleven and twelve. Primarily my focus is around

0:08:03.902 --> 0:08:08.022
<v Speaker 2>putting the spotlight on what consent means, how consenters defined

0:08:08.702 --> 0:08:12.462
<v Speaker 2>what sexual intercourse legally means versus inn a biological context.

0:08:12.862 --> 0:08:17.382
<v Speaker 2>They know the slogans around an intimate exchange requires consent.

0:08:17.542 --> 0:08:20.022
<v Speaker 2>It's like, well, yep, they all know that. But then

0:08:20.062 --> 0:08:23.382
<v Speaker 2>if you say, okay, tell me what consent is, how

0:08:23.382 --> 0:08:24.622
<v Speaker 2>do you know you have it? How do you know

0:08:24.662 --> 0:08:27.622
<v Speaker 2>you've provided it? What if a friend comes to talk

0:08:27.662 --> 0:08:29.902
<v Speaker 2>to you about something that they've gone through and they're

0:08:29.942 --> 0:08:31.742
<v Speaker 2>sort of asking you, do you think I consented or

0:08:31.742 --> 0:08:35.022
<v Speaker 2>didn't I? Where are you drawing your answers from on that?

0:08:35.782 --> 0:08:39.142
<v Speaker 2>So leaving the police, I thought the last thing that

0:08:39.262 --> 0:08:42.702
<v Speaker 2>students would want to hear in my seminars is legal stuff.

0:08:43.582 --> 0:08:46.742
<v Speaker 2>It's ninety nine percent of the questions I get are

0:08:46.822 --> 0:08:50.422
<v Speaker 2>legal questions, and it gives clarity for them. So we

0:08:50.462 --> 0:08:53.942
<v Speaker 2>look at a term, say, for example, like consent, then

0:08:53.942 --> 0:08:57.582
<v Speaker 2>I break it into its three legal components, age, effects

0:08:57.582 --> 0:09:00.822
<v Speaker 2>of our colon drugs, and whether the permission was given freely.

0:09:00.902 --> 0:09:03.742
<v Speaker 2>So we put the spotlight on those three. But I

0:09:03.782 --> 0:09:06.622
<v Speaker 2>go from defining what it is to running it through

0:09:06.662 --> 0:09:09.542
<v Speaker 2>real life scenarios for them and giving them really easy

0:09:09.622 --> 0:09:14.662
<v Speaker 2>checkpoints around it. So rather than assuming that because all

0:09:14.862 --> 0:09:18.462
<v Speaker 2>year eleven, year twelve students know a drunk person can't consent, well,

0:09:18.462 --> 0:09:21.262
<v Speaker 2>that doesn't mean they know what the test is legally.

0:09:21.422 --> 0:09:23.582
<v Speaker 2>They've got no idea what the test is. So they

0:09:23.622 --> 0:09:26.582
<v Speaker 2>know the slogan, but they don't really know what it means.

0:09:27.142 --> 0:09:30.982
<v Speaker 2>So I explain to them how it's defined legally. Then

0:09:31.022 --> 0:09:35.022
<v Speaker 2>I give them the practical application of that in a

0:09:35.062 --> 0:09:37.622
<v Speaker 2>party environment or something like that. So I'm hoping that

0:09:38.302 --> 0:09:41.302
<v Speaker 2>they can walk out with these key things around in

0:09:41.342 --> 0:09:44.782
<v Speaker 2>that instance around consent. Consent is a very complex thing,

0:09:45.622 --> 0:09:48.702
<v Speaker 2>but my job is to simplify it but still have

0:09:48.742 --> 0:09:54.222
<v Speaker 2>application to the law. Talking about things like sexual intercourse

0:09:54.262 --> 0:09:58.382
<v Speaker 2>without consent. I get disclosures every week, and it's usually

0:09:58.382 --> 0:10:01.662
<v Speaker 2>young women. The bulk of them say to me, look,

0:10:01.742 --> 0:10:05.022
<v Speaker 2>I didn't actually know that what happened to me was

0:10:05.102 --> 0:10:08.342
<v Speaker 2>a criminal offense or what the offense was until I

0:10:08.422 --> 0:10:13.902
<v Speaker 2>heard all these definitions. Simple stuff like the term sexual intercourse.

0:10:14.302 --> 0:10:16.022
<v Speaker 2>I mean, they all have heard the term, but the

0:10:16.062 --> 0:10:18.342
<v Speaker 2>definition that they have at high school comes from a

0:10:18.382 --> 0:10:22.422
<v Speaker 2>biology textbook which bears no resemblance to the law. So

0:10:22.582 --> 0:10:26.822
<v Speaker 2>just giving that piece of information, that opens up a

0:10:26.902 --> 0:10:29.622
<v Speaker 2>whole lot of Oh my goodness, I've been through this,

0:10:30.422 --> 0:10:32.022
<v Speaker 2>but I didn't know that when I went through that

0:10:32.342 --> 0:10:35.982
<v Speaker 2>it fell into that legal category. A really common question

0:10:36.062 --> 0:10:39.422
<v Speaker 2>I get speaking to young women is what if somebody

0:10:39.502 --> 0:10:42.542
<v Speaker 2>does something to me sexually without my consent, but it

0:10:42.582 --> 0:10:47.502
<v Speaker 2>doesn't go as far as intercourse. Now, people know that's wrong,

0:10:47.582 --> 0:10:50.822
<v Speaker 2>people know that that shouldn't happen, But respectfully, most people

0:10:50.822 --> 0:10:54.062
<v Speaker 2>would struggle to tell you what that offense is and

0:10:54.142 --> 0:10:56.822
<v Speaker 2>what the ingredients are of it. That's the most common

0:10:56.862 --> 0:11:01.142
<v Speaker 2>disclosure I get, particularly in co ed schools, often young

0:11:01.182 --> 0:11:03.622
<v Speaker 2>women coming forward after my talk saying I had no

0:11:03.782 --> 0:11:08.382
<v Speaker 2>idea of that unlawful sexual touching, stuff that's happened to

0:11:08.422 --> 0:11:11.422
<v Speaker 2>me heaps without getting the malodrum about it. Each time

0:11:11.462 --> 0:11:13.742
<v Speaker 2>someone does that in New South Wales carries a five

0:11:13.782 --> 0:11:16.982
<v Speaker 2>year in prisonment term. I've had young women come forward

0:11:17.062 --> 0:11:20.382
<v Speaker 2>say oh, that's happened to me every day at school

0:11:20.382 --> 0:11:20.902
<v Speaker 2>this term.

0:11:21.622 --> 0:11:24.182
<v Speaker 1>Does it surprise you the amount of women that come forward?

0:11:24.302 --> 0:11:28.022
<v Speaker 2>No? No, not after thirty years. Yeah, doesn't surprise me.

0:11:28.582 --> 0:11:30.822
<v Speaker 2>I'm more surprised when not too many come forward.

0:11:31.702 --> 0:11:33.662
<v Speaker 1>Has it changed? You know you said you did your

0:11:33.702 --> 0:11:37.622
<v Speaker 1>first seminar in nineteen ninety five. Are women more knowledgeable

0:11:37.622 --> 0:11:38.542
<v Speaker 1>now more confident?

0:11:38.862 --> 0:11:42.222
<v Speaker 2>I think so. I think there's sometimes a confusion that

0:11:42.382 --> 0:11:46.142
<v Speaker 2>because we have more disclosures, because we probably have more

0:11:46.142 --> 0:11:50.222
<v Speaker 2>cases reported, that it's happening more. I don't think that

0:11:50.382 --> 0:11:52.782
<v Speaker 2>is the case. I don't think there's really much in

0:11:52.822 --> 0:11:55.622
<v Speaker 2>the way of evidence to show that we have a

0:11:55.782 --> 0:12:01.062
<v Speaker 2>increase in sexual crime against young women in Australia compared

0:12:01.062 --> 0:12:03.782
<v Speaker 2>to nineteen ninety five to today. But what we do have,

0:12:03.982 --> 0:12:06.862
<v Speaker 2>as you quite rightly point out, there's a lot more knowledge,

0:12:06.982 --> 0:12:09.262
<v Speaker 2>and you know people can access all of this online.

0:12:09.782 --> 0:12:12.022
<v Speaker 2>That can be good bad because you don't know how

0:12:12.062 --> 0:12:15.862
<v Speaker 2>reliable the information is that they're getting courses going into

0:12:15.902 --> 0:12:21.182
<v Speaker 2>schools currently talking about consent things which are appalling. So

0:12:21.222 --> 0:12:24.422
<v Speaker 2>there's a lot of misinformation out there. I come from

0:12:24.422 --> 0:12:26.382
<v Speaker 2>that policing background, and I've done this for a long

0:12:26.422 --> 0:12:28.782
<v Speaker 2>long time, so I don't go outside of those rails.

0:12:29.182 --> 0:12:31.902
<v Speaker 2>I think there is no doubt that we are seeing

0:12:31.942 --> 0:12:37.582
<v Speaker 2>an increase in reporting, but I think that's indicative of

0:12:37.582 --> 0:12:41.622
<v Speaker 2>an increase in people becoming more aware. Statistics would suggest

0:12:41.662 --> 0:12:44.582
<v Speaker 2>there's no massive increase in incidences.

0:12:45.542 --> 0:12:47.982
<v Speaker 1>A lot of what you do is actually giving the

0:12:48.102 --> 0:12:51.902
<v Speaker 1>tools to your students, a lot of whom are women,

0:12:51.982 --> 0:12:55.822
<v Speaker 1>about how to actually physically and mentally protect themselves if

0:12:55.822 --> 0:12:58.302
<v Speaker 1>they're in a situation. And I want to address this

0:12:58.382 --> 0:13:00.942
<v Speaker 1>question first because I can imagine it's been put to you.

0:13:02.502 --> 0:13:04.462
<v Speaker 1>Some might say that the owners shouldn't be on women

0:13:04.782 --> 0:13:07.982
<v Speaker 1>to kind of change their behavior and learn the tactics,

0:13:08.022 --> 0:13:11.462
<v Speaker 1>that it should be on teaching men. Definitely, what do

0:13:11.502 --> 0:13:12.062
<v Speaker 1>you say to that.

0:13:12.102 --> 0:13:14.862
<v Speaker 2>I agree one hundred percent, but that's not going to

0:13:14.902 --> 0:13:18.982
<v Speaker 2>help a woman who this afternoon is confronted an ideological

0:13:19.062 --> 0:13:21.782
<v Speaker 2>view that we should come up with something that stops

0:13:21.822 --> 0:13:23.822
<v Speaker 2>men from doing this. You won't get any argument from

0:13:23.862 --> 0:13:26.582
<v Speaker 2>me I present to more young men I do young women.

0:13:26.822 --> 0:13:29.582
<v Speaker 2>I've got a son and a daughter. Of course, in

0:13:29.622 --> 0:13:33.862
<v Speaker 2>a perfect world, firstly, the stuff wouldn't happen. Secondly, if

0:13:33.862 --> 0:13:35.902
<v Speaker 2>it does, we'd be able to address those who do

0:13:35.942 --> 0:13:39.102
<v Speaker 2>it and they'd stop. Now, we can reduce this stuff,

0:13:39.862 --> 0:13:43.422
<v Speaker 2>but we're never going to stop it completely. In my book,

0:13:43.462 --> 0:13:45.822
<v Speaker 2>I put forward a lot of different strategies and things

0:13:45.822 --> 0:13:48.862
<v Speaker 2>such as that based on the psychology of the type

0:13:48.862 --> 0:13:51.382
<v Speaker 2>of offender that you're up against. I don't do that anymore.

0:13:51.742 --> 0:13:54.302
<v Speaker 2>And the reason I don't do it anymore is because

0:13:54.982 --> 0:13:57.662
<v Speaker 2>I've always walked this thin line as a male presenting

0:13:57.662 --> 0:14:00.302
<v Speaker 2>on the stuff anyway, as a next police officer, you know,

0:14:00.342 --> 0:14:03.182
<v Speaker 2>I've always been a very very easy target for people

0:14:03.902 --> 0:14:07.142
<v Speaker 2>to push back against this, you know, and that target

0:14:07.182 --> 0:14:11.142
<v Speaker 2>became even bigger in more recent times because, in the

0:14:11.142 --> 0:14:15.102
<v Speaker 2>eyes of many, I had the audacity to share strategies

0:14:15.142 --> 0:14:17.782
<v Speaker 2>with young women to help them get out of these situations.

0:14:17.942 --> 0:14:21.102
<v Speaker 2>So I don't do it anymore now. The downside to

0:14:21.142 --> 0:14:25.662
<v Speaker 2>that is that might ideologically make some people feel better

0:14:25.862 --> 0:14:29.502
<v Speaker 2>about themselves because they've stopped this police officer going into

0:14:29.502 --> 0:14:33.782
<v Speaker 2>schools and teaching strategies the downside is I taught a

0:14:33.822 --> 0:14:38.542
<v Speaker 2>strategy for probably twenty five years to young women on

0:14:38.582 --> 0:14:41.062
<v Speaker 2>how to get out of a date rape situation, and

0:14:41.102 --> 0:14:45.342
<v Speaker 2>I never ever had one person contact me to tell

0:14:45.342 --> 0:14:48.462
<v Speaker 2>me that that strategy had failed. Ever. But I don't

0:14:48.462 --> 0:14:52.182
<v Speaker 2>teach it anymore because I got so much pushback more

0:14:52.222 --> 0:14:55.422
<v Speaker 2>recently going into schools about teaching strategy, and that was

0:14:55.462 --> 0:15:00.542
<v Speaker 2>then victim blaming. So I'm supportive of all of this stuff,

0:15:01.662 --> 0:15:04.462
<v Speaker 2>but I know also working at the coal Face, that

0:15:04.742 --> 0:15:07.222
<v Speaker 2>some of this stuff, even if it's done with good intent,

0:15:08.062 --> 0:15:11.742
<v Speaker 2>the end result is detrimental to those who I'm trying

0:15:11.742 --> 0:15:13.142
<v Speaker 2>to help see.

0:15:13.182 --> 0:15:17.062
<v Speaker 1>I read through those strategies and felt quite empowered by them,

0:15:17.062 --> 0:15:20.622
<v Speaker 1>so I'm surprised to hear that people have pushed back

0:15:20.662 --> 0:15:21.582
<v Speaker 1>against you sharing them.

0:15:21.622 --> 0:15:23.622
<v Speaker 2>Well, the only people who push back are people who've

0:15:23.662 --> 0:15:26.102
<v Speaker 2>never read my book or never attended one of my seminars,

0:15:26.102 --> 0:15:28.942
<v Speaker 2>but they're very vocal. But you know, after all these years,

0:15:29.702 --> 0:15:31.502
<v Speaker 2>I just sort of thought, well, you know what, I'm

0:15:31.542 --> 0:15:33.182
<v Speaker 2>going to keep going and I'm going to doing my

0:15:33.302 --> 0:15:35.942
<v Speaker 2>talks and when people ask me about strategy, I say, yeah,

0:15:35.942 --> 0:15:37.942
<v Speaker 2>I've got some fantastic strategies that you can have a

0:15:37.942 --> 0:15:38.902
<v Speaker 2>look into my book.

0:15:38.702 --> 0:15:42.902
<v Speaker 1>And things bring it on. There is a bit of

0:15:42.902 --> 0:15:46.062
<v Speaker 1>advice that floats around a lot. Yes, with women, if

0:15:46.102 --> 0:15:48.662
<v Speaker 1>you are presented with a situation where someone is trying

0:15:48.702 --> 0:15:52.222
<v Speaker 1>to physically or sexually hurt you, to submit to them. Yes,

0:15:53.462 --> 0:15:55.542
<v Speaker 1>Why do you think that that is a very bad idea.

0:15:56.222 --> 0:15:58.542
<v Speaker 2>I think it's a bad idea in sexual crime particularly. Look,

0:15:58.542 --> 0:16:00.302
<v Speaker 2>don't get me wrong. If I walked out of here

0:16:00.302 --> 0:16:02.782
<v Speaker 2>today and somebody attacked me in a side street here

0:16:02.782 --> 0:16:04.502
<v Speaker 2>in willem Aloo and one of my wallet, I'd probably

0:16:04.542 --> 0:16:06.422
<v Speaker 2>hand it over to them. Now, I'm one hundred and

0:16:06.502 --> 0:16:09.142
<v Speaker 2>five kilos, I've got no neck, you know. But I

0:16:09.182 --> 0:16:11.142
<v Speaker 2>know the person that confronts me, he is a desperate

0:16:11.182 --> 0:16:15.622
<v Speaker 2>person because I probably wouldn't confront me. Does that make sense?

0:16:16.342 --> 0:16:19.182
<v Speaker 2>So I don't want to make a bad situation even worse.

0:16:19.542 --> 0:16:22.742
<v Speaker 2>So sometimes the best thing to do is the opposite

0:16:22.782 --> 0:16:24.702
<v Speaker 2>to what we're told. See, guys aren't told to do that.

0:16:25.262 --> 0:16:27.342
<v Speaker 2>Guys are told if someone fronts up to you monst

0:16:27.342 --> 0:16:30.782
<v Speaker 2>your wallet, you'd stand your ground, you puff your chest out. Well,

0:16:30.822 --> 0:16:33.222
<v Speaker 2>I've been in more physical confrontations and most blokes have

0:16:33.302 --> 0:16:35.942
<v Speaker 2>had hot dinners, and I wouldn't do that, So I

0:16:35.942 --> 0:16:39.102
<v Speaker 2>would never encourage someone to do that. Now, when we

0:16:39.142 --> 0:16:42.142
<v Speaker 2>flick that over to sexual crime, why is my message different?

0:16:42.422 --> 0:16:45.822
<v Speaker 2>Because the psychology of the person who selects you as

0:16:45.862 --> 0:16:48.182
<v Speaker 2>a young woman to commit a sexual offense against you,

0:16:48.222 --> 0:16:52.222
<v Speaker 2>the stranger offender, he is a totally different psychological study

0:16:52.262 --> 0:16:55.182
<v Speaker 2>than the person who confronts me. See, I look like

0:16:55.182 --> 0:16:58.462
<v Speaker 2>i'd fight back. So if I do that, I'm actually

0:16:58.462 --> 0:17:01.982
<v Speaker 2>doing what they're anticipating. Nobody is going to confront me

0:17:02.822 --> 0:17:05.662
<v Speaker 2>my size and think that I'm going to curl up

0:17:05.662 --> 0:17:07.782
<v Speaker 2>on the ground and with my hands in there. They

0:17:07.782 --> 0:17:09.742
<v Speaker 2>think I'm going to fight back, so I to empower

0:17:09.742 --> 0:17:12.342
<v Speaker 2>them by not doing that. Now, if we look at

0:17:12.382 --> 0:17:14.702
<v Speaker 2>the psychology of offender who selects you, and this is

0:17:14.742 --> 0:17:18.022
<v Speaker 2>not an indictment on you, it's a reflection on why

0:17:18.022 --> 0:17:22.142
<v Speaker 2>you're selected. You're selected by a sex offender because he believes,

0:17:22.182 --> 0:17:25.542
<v Speaker 2>because you're female, you won't fight back. So you've got

0:17:25.582 --> 0:17:28.982
<v Speaker 2>to start working from that psychology. So, on the one hand,

0:17:29.142 --> 0:17:32.742
<v Speaker 2>you're quite right. There's been a generational message to girls

0:17:32.742 --> 0:17:35.862
<v Speaker 2>and women handed down from their mums, which were handed

0:17:35.902 --> 0:17:38.342
<v Speaker 2>down from their mums. So now we're back over one

0:17:38.382 --> 0:17:41.302
<v Speaker 2>hundred years that the worst thing you could possibly do

0:17:41.902 --> 0:17:44.942
<v Speaker 2>against that unknown sexual offender, who might I add as

0:17:44.982 --> 0:17:47.302
<v Speaker 2>a very rare form of sexual crime, but it's something

0:17:47.302 --> 0:17:50.182
<v Speaker 2>that occupies the minds of a lot of people because

0:17:50.222 --> 0:17:52.942
<v Speaker 2>it brings to life what we see in TV in

0:17:52.982 --> 0:17:55.862
<v Speaker 2>the movies. Ninety nine point nine percent of sexual offenders

0:17:55.862 --> 0:17:59.382
<v Speaker 2>that are depicted through those services are strangers, even though

0:17:59.382 --> 0:18:02.542
<v Speaker 2>they make up a tiny percentage of sexual crime. But

0:18:02.742 --> 0:18:05.622
<v Speaker 2>I get that every woman I've ever met in my

0:18:05.782 --> 0:18:10.422
<v Speaker 2>life has a desire to know what would you add

0:18:10.462 --> 0:18:14.662
<v Speaker 2>actually do in that situation. So my approach has always been, Okay, well,

0:18:14.702 --> 0:18:17.502
<v Speaker 2>let's look at the psychology of it. I get them

0:18:17.542 --> 0:18:19.662
<v Speaker 2>to imagine, say, walking home from school on their own,

0:18:20.342 --> 0:18:23.062
<v Speaker 2>car drives past slowly. Lone male offender in the car,

0:18:23.182 --> 0:18:25.822
<v Speaker 2>you know, looks at the young woman, pulls up twenty

0:18:25.862 --> 0:18:29.302
<v Speaker 2>minutes away, gets out of the car, which is making

0:18:29.342 --> 0:18:32.062
<v Speaker 2>the young woman feel afraid. And I get to the

0:18:32.062 --> 0:18:34.302
<v Speaker 2>point of saying, this guy runs out of the car

0:18:34.342 --> 0:18:36.502
<v Speaker 2>and he grabs you, and he's taking you back towards

0:18:36.542 --> 0:18:40.742
<v Speaker 2>the car, and I say, what I want you to

0:18:40.742 --> 0:18:43.662
<v Speaker 2>do is I want you to picture yourself in that situation,

0:18:43.742 --> 0:18:46.822
<v Speaker 2>at that moment yelling and screaming at the top of

0:18:46.862 --> 0:18:51.782
<v Speaker 2>your voice and physically attacking your attacker, and then I

0:18:51.822 --> 0:18:55.222
<v Speaker 2>stop it there. And the most common reaction I've got

0:18:55.262 --> 0:18:57.462
<v Speaker 2>over the years of doing that is the girls will laugh.

0:18:58.782 --> 0:19:01.662
<v Speaker 2>The laughter is the thought that they would actually see

0:19:01.702 --> 0:19:05.902
<v Speaker 2>themselves fighting a back against a man attacker. It's like, yeah, right,

0:19:05.942 --> 0:19:08.382
<v Speaker 2>as if you do that. So this is where we

0:19:08.462 --> 0:19:12.702
<v Speaker 2>work from, right, because the way the girls are reacting

0:19:13.502 --> 0:19:16.222
<v Speaker 2>is not through the experience of having been in the situation.

0:19:16.742 --> 0:19:20.942
<v Speaker 2>They're reacting to their conditioning. So in any conflict situation

0:19:21.102 --> 0:19:24.182
<v Speaker 2>you or I find ourselves in, we're not really responding

0:19:24.222 --> 0:19:28.182
<v Speaker 2>to the situation. We've carried into the situation our conditioning.

0:19:28.742 --> 0:19:30.542
<v Speaker 2>If you're trained to do the right thing, that's brilliant.

0:19:30.982 --> 0:19:34.062
<v Speaker 2>If you're trained to do the wrong thing, that's not great. So, okay,

0:19:34.222 --> 0:19:36.462
<v Speaker 2>this guy had hold of you, dragging in toowards the car.

0:19:36.782 --> 0:19:39.462
<v Speaker 2>If you start yelling and screaming fight back, what would

0:19:39.462 --> 0:19:42.422
<v Speaker 2>happen to the guy? What would he become? And they

0:19:42.462 --> 0:19:46.262
<v Speaker 2>all like or get more angry, So there's our first barrier.

0:19:46.862 --> 0:19:48.662
<v Speaker 2>Next thing I say is if the guy does get

0:19:48.662 --> 0:19:53.382
<v Speaker 2>more angry because of how you respond, will that increase

0:19:53.582 --> 0:19:57.342
<v Speaker 2>or decrease the likelihood of him physically hurting you. Now

0:19:57.382 --> 0:20:01.622
<v Speaker 2>they're also a little increase. It's obvious he's an aggressive,

0:20:01.622 --> 0:20:04.382
<v Speaker 2>angry person and he's violent. He's going to become more violent.

0:20:05.102 --> 0:20:07.982
<v Speaker 2>Then the third thing I says, if you respond in

0:20:07.982 --> 0:20:10.342
<v Speaker 2>a way that you believe will make this guy more

0:20:10.502 --> 0:20:13.022
<v Speaker 2>angry and that will increase the lightlihood of you getting hurt,

0:20:14.142 --> 0:20:16.702
<v Speaker 2>would you say that the situation for you as a

0:20:16.782 --> 0:20:19.222
<v Speaker 2>result of that response is going to get better or worse?

0:20:19.662 --> 0:20:23.902
<v Speaker 2>That will say, well, worse. So that just explains why

0:20:24.022 --> 0:20:26.782
<v Speaker 2>so many don't fight back. All I've got them to

0:20:26.862 --> 0:20:30.862
<v Speaker 2>do is to tell me what they've been conditioned to believe. Now, interestingly,

0:20:30.902 --> 0:20:33.502
<v Speaker 2>if you look at any studies on this, the success

0:20:33.582 --> 0:20:35.822
<v Speaker 2>rate of women yelling and screaming and fighting back against

0:20:35.902 --> 0:20:39.262
<v Speaker 2>unarmed sex offenders is over ninety percent. You couldn't find

0:20:39.302 --> 0:20:43.422
<v Speaker 2>a study that would dispute that. All the research, all

0:20:43.462 --> 0:20:47.702
<v Speaker 2>the study, all the psychology provides the totally different information

0:20:47.822 --> 0:20:50.462
<v Speaker 2>and knowledge than conditioning, because where do people get their

0:20:50.462 --> 0:20:54.342
<v Speaker 2>conditioning from? TV? Movies? So what I do is I'll say, okay,

0:20:54.422 --> 0:20:56.982
<v Speaker 2>let's break this down. When that guy drives past you

0:20:57.102 --> 0:20:58.862
<v Speaker 2>and sees you, why does he stop the car and

0:20:58.942 --> 0:21:02.102
<v Speaker 2>get out? And sometimes I'll say, do you reckon? If

0:21:02.142 --> 0:21:04.342
<v Speaker 2>I was walking down the street, that guy would stop

0:21:04.342 --> 0:21:07.542
<v Speaker 2>and confront me, and they'll laugh, of course, not what

0:21:07.622 --> 0:21:09.582
<v Speaker 2>do I look like I do? Or you'd look like

0:21:09.622 --> 0:21:13.102
<v Speaker 2>you'd fight back. So it's interesting here, isn't it. They're

0:21:13.102 --> 0:21:15.382
<v Speaker 2>saying the reason he'll drive away from you is you

0:21:15.422 --> 0:21:19.022
<v Speaker 2>look like you'll defend yourself. The reason he selects them

0:21:19.142 --> 0:21:21.582
<v Speaker 2>is they look like they won't and then they're told

0:21:21.702 --> 0:21:24.982
<v Speaker 2>not to. You can just see these lights going on

0:21:25.062 --> 0:21:27.822
<v Speaker 2>like this, Hang on, I've been sold a bit of

0:21:27.822 --> 0:21:31.342
<v Speaker 2>a lemon here, you know. I take them into the

0:21:31.382 --> 0:21:34.062
<v Speaker 2>mind of the offender, and I said that offender's driving

0:21:34.102 --> 0:21:36.542
<v Speaker 2>around a car looking for an ideal target. This is

0:21:36.582 --> 0:21:38.862
<v Speaker 2>what they say when you interview them. You know, I'm

0:21:38.902 --> 0:21:42.342
<v Speaker 2>looking for somebody who will follow the script that I've

0:21:42.382 --> 0:21:46.102
<v Speaker 2>written for them, so he will select only somebody who

0:21:46.142 --> 0:21:49.742
<v Speaker 2>he believes will offer no resistance. And I'll say something

0:21:49.902 --> 0:21:52.982
<v Speaker 2>like with the sex offenders I've interviewed that I've written

0:21:53.022 --> 0:21:55.462
<v Speaker 2>books about and what have you. If he had a

0:21:55.462 --> 0:21:58.822
<v Speaker 2>crystal ball on the dashboard of his car and he

0:21:58.942 --> 0:22:01.102
<v Speaker 2>drove past you, and he looked into the crystal ball,

0:22:01.302 --> 0:22:04.382
<v Speaker 2>and he could see how you would respond if he

0:22:04.422 --> 0:22:08.942
<v Speaker 2>saw you yelling, screaming, running, fighting back. Every single offender

0:22:09.022 --> 0:22:11.942
<v Speaker 2>I have ever interviewed keep on driving. But he doesn't

0:22:11.982 --> 0:22:15.502
<v Speaker 2>see that. He sees you as being somebody who will

0:22:15.502 --> 0:22:20.222
<v Speaker 2>probably submit. Now, these girls and women are told that's

0:22:20.262 --> 0:22:24.302
<v Speaker 2>the safest option. Now, it's an option if a guy

0:22:24.342 --> 0:22:29.062
<v Speaker 2>produces a weapon police are trained to submit to talking about.

0:22:29.182 --> 0:22:33.542
<v Speaker 2>But sex offenders in Australia hardly ever carry weapons. So

0:22:33.622 --> 0:22:36.142
<v Speaker 2>it's breaking all that down. And it's not actually even

0:22:36.222 --> 0:22:38.622
<v Speaker 2>me telling the audience what they should and shouldn't do.

0:22:38.942 --> 0:22:41.742
<v Speaker 2>It's just presenting them with information that they didn't have.

0:22:42.702 --> 0:22:45.182
<v Speaker 2>So you've got four options when that guy jumps out

0:22:45.222 --> 0:22:47.782
<v Speaker 2>of the car. You can be submissive. That gives you

0:22:47.822 --> 0:22:51.262
<v Speaker 2>no chance. You can yell and scream. That'll work probably

0:22:51.302 --> 0:22:53.942
<v Speaker 2>fifty percent of the time. If you combine yelling and

0:22:53.942 --> 0:22:58.662
<v Speaker 2>screaming with physical confrontation, your success rates so high you'd

0:22:58.702 --> 0:23:00.822
<v Speaker 2>be hard pressed finding anyone who's done it who hasn't

0:23:00.862 --> 0:23:01.302
<v Speaker 2>got away.

0:23:02.702 --> 0:23:05.582
<v Speaker 1>So why aren't more people teaching us this?

0:23:06.542 --> 0:23:06.982
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

0:23:08.542 --> 0:23:10.182
<v Speaker 1>You're right. I had a light bulb moment when I

0:23:10.182 --> 0:23:13.062
<v Speaker 1>read and I went, why on earth would I just

0:23:13.982 --> 0:23:17.022
<v Speaker 1>happily get into a car with someone who is trying.

0:23:17.022 --> 0:23:20.022
<v Speaker 2>Because you've been conditioned to believe anything else will make

0:23:20.022 --> 0:23:22.622
<v Speaker 2>it worse. But then you've got to stop and go, Okay,

0:23:23.182 --> 0:23:25.662
<v Speaker 2>that person who's put me into that car, what are

0:23:25.662 --> 0:23:28.542
<v Speaker 2>his intentions? See, I'm going to say to that young woman,

0:23:28.622 --> 0:23:32.222
<v Speaker 2>you're in the can't get worse basket? You're there? Yeah,

0:23:32.302 --> 0:23:35.422
<v Speaker 2>Now can I just stay? Also, the better option than

0:23:35.542 --> 0:23:38.982
<v Speaker 2>yelling and screaming and fighting back is running. If you

0:23:39.022 --> 0:23:41.182
<v Speaker 2>can run, you run, you run, you yell, you scream,

0:23:41.262 --> 0:23:43.182
<v Speaker 2>you get to somewhere where there's people. Because these guys

0:23:43.222 --> 0:23:47.462
<v Speaker 2>are terrified. They're terrified to getting caught, absolutely paranoid to

0:23:47.502 --> 0:23:51.542
<v Speaker 2>getting caught, and they're totally unprepared for anything other than submission.

0:23:51.702 --> 0:23:54.142
<v Speaker 2>So running is the best option. But we have to

0:23:54.182 --> 0:23:56.742
<v Speaker 2>accept that there are some circumstances where young women have

0:23:56.862 --> 0:24:00.102
<v Speaker 2>said I was grabbed, I couldn't run, It wasn't an option.

0:24:00.822 --> 0:24:03.382
<v Speaker 2>If running is not available, the next best option, well,

0:24:03.422 --> 0:24:07.702
<v Speaker 2>what is it? Submission? That would be disputed by every

0:24:07.742 --> 0:24:10.262
<v Speaker 2>study ever done on rape psychology as a strategy that

0:24:10.622 --> 0:24:14.982
<v Speaker 2>anything more than make the situation worse. So anything is

0:24:14.982 --> 0:24:15.582
<v Speaker 2>better than that.

0:24:20.942 --> 0:24:24.942
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to true crime conversations with me Jemma Bath.

0:24:25.582 --> 0:24:29.062
<v Speaker 1>I'm speaking with Brent Sanders about how to protect yourself

0:24:29.182 --> 0:24:33.342
<v Speaker 1>from sexual crime. Up next, we break down what consent

0:24:33.662 --> 0:24:43.382
<v Speaker 1>actually means. I want to give listeners a real life

0:24:43.422 --> 0:24:45.902
<v Speaker 1>example because it's so easy to say all the studies

0:24:45.902 --> 0:24:49.662
<v Speaker 1>say it doesn't work, but you actually give real life examples.

0:24:49.742 --> 0:24:53.182
<v Speaker 1>Ted Bundy, there's a serial rapist in New Zealand by

0:24:53.182 --> 0:24:53.702
<v Speaker 1>the names.

0:24:53.502 --> 0:24:54.342
<v Speaker 2>Of Joseph Thompson.

0:24:54.582 --> 0:24:56.902
<v Speaker 1>Can you take us through what he did, because it's

0:24:57.142 --> 0:24:58.382
<v Speaker 1>proof that this is true.

0:24:58.822 --> 0:25:01.102
<v Speaker 2>I just give more the information and you would not

0:25:01.222 --> 0:25:04.422
<v Speaker 2>find a serial sex offender that's been profiled since Albert DeSalvo.

0:25:04.542 --> 0:25:07.702
<v Speaker 2>He was the first ever profiled sex offender. He raped

0:25:07.702 --> 0:25:10.542
<v Speaker 2>and murdered a dozen or more women between c. Next

0:25:10.662 --> 0:25:13.542
<v Speaker 2>two and sixty four. Was arrested in charge. But you

0:25:13.582 --> 0:25:15.582
<v Speaker 2>know he was interviewed by homicide detects because in the

0:25:15.622 --> 0:25:18.102
<v Speaker 2>sixties there were no sex crimes detectors. There was a

0:25:18.102 --> 0:25:21.822
<v Speaker 2>book written about him, The Boston Strangler. I quote that

0:25:21.902 --> 0:25:24.542
<v Speaker 2>book in my book because it's the first ever book

0:25:24.622 --> 0:25:29.222
<v Speaker 2>written about a serial rapist. He's the first one ever studied.

0:25:29.982 --> 0:25:32.102
<v Speaker 2>And as I read through that book, there were things

0:25:32.142 --> 0:25:34.942
<v Speaker 2>jumping off the page at me, because they're the same

0:25:34.982 --> 0:25:37.422
<v Speaker 2>as if I sat down and interviewed a sex offender today.

0:25:38.062 --> 0:25:40.382
<v Speaker 2>One of the classic quotes from him is he was asked,

0:25:41.022 --> 0:25:43.822
<v Speaker 2>how many women do you believe you've attacked in your lifetime?

0:25:44.102 --> 0:25:46.742
<v Speaker 2>And he said, oh, I couldn't tell you. I don't know.

0:25:46.982 --> 0:25:49.542
<v Speaker 2>So I committed my kim my first rate when I

0:25:49.622 --> 0:25:52.702
<v Speaker 2>was sixteen, So I remember that one like it was yesterday.

0:25:52.742 --> 0:25:56.302
<v Speaker 2>I remember everything about it. He said. Since then, some

0:25:56.462 --> 0:25:58.782
<v Speaker 2>days I won't attack any girls and women. Some days

0:25:58.822 --> 0:26:02.102
<v Speaker 2>I might attacked two or three. Then he was asked

0:26:02.622 --> 0:26:04.942
<v Speaker 2>about those that he attacked, those that he didn't, and stuff,

0:26:04.942 --> 0:26:07.182
<v Speaker 2>and he basically in one of the statements he said,

0:26:07.702 --> 0:26:10.182
<v Speaker 2>I can't tell you how many girls and women I've selected.

0:26:10.942 --> 0:26:12.302
<v Speaker 2>He said, what I can tell you of all the

0:26:12.302 --> 0:26:14.222
<v Speaker 2>women I selected, the only ones who I didn't rate

0:26:14.262 --> 0:26:16.662
<v Speaker 2>were the ones who fought back. Now, there wouldn't have

0:26:16.662 --> 0:26:21.502
<v Speaker 2>been too many women who would have been told to

0:26:21.542 --> 0:26:24.982
<v Speaker 2>do anything other than to do exactly what this guy wants.

0:26:25.942 --> 0:26:28.702
<v Speaker 2>Following his arrest, he said he was killing his victims.

0:26:29.022 --> 0:26:30.542
<v Speaker 2>The only ones I ran away from were the ones

0:26:30.542 --> 0:26:32.502
<v Speaker 2>who fought back then you come forward, like you say.

0:26:32.542 --> 0:26:34.902
<v Speaker 2>Joseph Thompson. Joseph Thompson was a New Zealand offender who

0:26:34.942 --> 0:26:38.142
<v Speaker 2>I profiled. He was an offender in his thirties or nearly.

0:26:38.142 --> 0:26:41.342
<v Speaker 2>All of his targets were young school girls. So he

0:26:41.422 --> 0:26:43.102
<v Speaker 2>was asked in an interview why do you attack so

0:26:43.142 --> 0:26:45.982
<v Speaker 2>many school girls? And he just he shrugged his shoulder

0:26:46.022 --> 0:26:47.982
<v Speaker 2>and says, oh, because school girls don't fight back. What

0:26:48.022 --> 0:26:50.782
<v Speaker 2>do you think I picked school girls? You look at

0:26:50.822 --> 0:26:53.422
<v Speaker 2>some of these other offenders that I've worked with, and

0:26:53.462 --> 0:26:58.342
<v Speaker 2>they all make these same comments. There's no exception. Now,

0:26:58.862 --> 0:27:02.502
<v Speaker 2>we can't say with absolute certainty what will happen every

0:27:02.542 --> 0:27:04.782
<v Speaker 2>time one of these type offenders attacks every one of

0:27:04.822 --> 0:27:07.582
<v Speaker 2>their targets. But what we can do is look at

0:27:07.582 --> 0:27:10.102
<v Speaker 2>all the studies, all the research from fifty odd years ago,

0:27:10.582 --> 0:27:13.182
<v Speaker 2>nearly sixty years ago coming forward, and you won't find

0:27:13.222 --> 0:27:16.742
<v Speaker 2>any much in the way discrepancy. Here. You mentioned Ted Bundy.

0:27:17.142 --> 0:27:19.222
<v Speaker 2>The woman who gave evidence against Ted Bundy was the

0:27:19.222 --> 0:27:20.222
<v Speaker 2>only one who survived.

0:27:20.582 --> 0:27:21.382
<v Speaker 1>And she fought Bash.

0:27:21.462 --> 0:27:23.022
<v Speaker 2>She fought back cat and Or he had a one

0:27:23.022 --> 0:27:25.702
<v Speaker 2>handcuff on her and her father was a police officer,

0:27:25.742 --> 0:27:28.062
<v Speaker 2>and she started to sust that he wasn't a police

0:27:28.102 --> 0:27:30.582
<v Speaker 2>officer because he made himself out to be. You know,

0:27:31.182 --> 0:27:34.902
<v Speaker 2>Bundy's just another example, and I mean Bundy was a

0:27:34.902 --> 0:27:38.902
<v Speaker 2>serial killer, where most sex offenders don't get to that.

0:27:38.942 --> 0:27:41.382
<v Speaker 2>But that is a line of continuum that they will

0:27:41.422 --> 0:27:43.862
<v Speaker 2>go down eventually. We don't get as many now because

0:27:44.382 --> 0:27:46.822
<v Speaker 2>our investigative techniques are so much better, we can get

0:27:46.862 --> 0:27:48.222
<v Speaker 2>them before it gets to that point.

0:27:49.142 --> 0:27:51.862
<v Speaker 1>You mentioned earlier that you had a strategy for date rate.

0:27:52.622 --> 0:27:55.622
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, can you share it with us? I can. The

0:27:55.662 --> 0:27:58.382
<v Speaker 2>problem is the brevity of the time that we have

0:27:58.502 --> 0:28:00.462
<v Speaker 2>to share it, because it's going to come across as

0:28:00.462 --> 0:28:01.662
<v Speaker 2>been quite bisarre. Have you read it?

0:28:01.702 --> 0:28:02.142
<v Speaker 1>You read it?

0:28:02.222 --> 0:28:04.662
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's total reverse psychology.

0:28:04.822 --> 0:28:07.262
<v Speaker 1>It goes against everything you've described it does.

0:28:07.342 --> 0:28:08.702
<v Speaker 2>But what do you think when you read it? What

0:28:08.742 --> 0:28:10.022
<v Speaker 2>did you think it made sense?

0:28:10.102 --> 0:28:14.742
<v Speaker 1>Because in a date rape scenario, you likely know that

0:28:14.782 --> 0:28:16.462
<v Speaker 1>person on some kind of level. You've had a few

0:28:16.542 --> 0:28:18.822
<v Speaker 1>dates with them, they're an acquaintance. You've been put in

0:28:18.862 --> 0:28:21.542
<v Speaker 1>a scenario where it's escalating to a point you don't

0:28:21.542 --> 0:28:25.542
<v Speaker 1>want it to, and so to turn around and yell

0:28:25.582 --> 0:28:28.342
<v Speaker 1>and scream doesn't feel like the right thing to do

0:28:28.462 --> 0:28:29.142
<v Speaker 1>in that moment.

0:28:29.382 --> 0:28:32.142
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. So the strategy in the date rape is different,

0:28:32.222 --> 0:28:32.502
<v Speaker 2>isn't it.

0:28:32.622 --> 0:28:32.982
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:28:33.022 --> 0:28:35.262
<v Speaker 2>In a date rape, the aggression is linked to the

0:28:35.262 --> 0:28:38.062
<v Speaker 2>word no. Now I'm not condaining, I'm not saying that's okay.

0:28:39.702 --> 0:28:42.782
<v Speaker 2>But young women who go through these type of sexual

0:28:42.822 --> 0:28:44.782
<v Speaker 2>crimes where they have a sexual offense commit against them

0:28:44.822 --> 0:28:46.222
<v Speaker 2>by someone you know, they've met at a party, or

0:28:46.222 --> 0:28:49.262
<v Speaker 2>they've knowne or what have you. Everything's going along swimmingly

0:28:49.382 --> 0:28:53.382
<v Speaker 2>until the women say no. And it's something about that

0:28:53.422 --> 0:28:56.702
<v Speaker 2>word no that makes the guy aggressive. And it's because

0:28:56.742 --> 0:28:59.382
<v Speaker 2>again time probably permits us from gameless too deeply. It's

0:28:59.422 --> 0:29:02.822
<v Speaker 2>because the word no challenges his belief that he was

0:29:02.862 --> 0:29:05.582
<v Speaker 2>going to get what he thinks he's entitled to get. Yeah,

0:29:05.742 --> 0:29:08.342
<v Speaker 2>And so if you keep saying no, it can increase

0:29:08.382 --> 0:29:11.702
<v Speaker 2>the aggression in that scenario. And I get that. The

0:29:11.742 --> 0:29:13.702
<v Speaker 2>thing in a date rape, though, and behind it is

0:29:14.022 --> 0:29:17.982
<v Speaker 2>a belief that he believes within himself that you'll probably

0:29:18.222 --> 0:29:21.022
<v Speaker 2>change your mind. See that is not a psychology present

0:29:21.022 --> 0:29:25.062
<v Speaker 2>with a serial sex offender. He doesn't care less for you.

0:29:25.542 --> 0:29:28.902
<v Speaker 2>That's not on his radar. The date rapist guy, he's

0:29:28.902 --> 0:29:32.022
<v Speaker 2>the word no. It's not ful no. And when that

0:29:32.142 --> 0:29:34.942
<v Speaker 2>leads to aggression. It's because he thinks he's entitled to

0:29:34.942 --> 0:29:37.942
<v Speaker 2>put pressure on you to get you to stop saying

0:29:37.942 --> 0:29:40.902
<v Speaker 2>no and to say what yes. So when he hears yes,

0:29:40.942 --> 0:29:44.662
<v Speaker 2>what happens to aggression? Will it increase or decrease? It'll

0:29:44.702 --> 0:29:48.862
<v Speaker 2>decrease because he's one, right, So it's that psychology playing

0:29:48.902 --> 0:29:51.062
<v Speaker 2>a part again there. So now he thinks he's one.

0:29:51.622 --> 0:29:54.582
<v Speaker 2>Now he's calmed down. You're in a much better situation

0:29:55.382 --> 0:29:58.382
<v Speaker 2>to get from where you are to somewhere safer now

0:29:58.422 --> 0:30:02.342
<v Speaker 2>that his defenses have been lowered. And so the component

0:30:02.422 --> 0:30:06.142
<v Speaker 2>there is I don't say you don't say no. You

0:30:06.262 --> 0:30:09.182
<v Speaker 2>say no, and you keep saying no until such time

0:30:09.222 --> 0:30:13.502
<v Speaker 2>as you're like full, this is actually getting worse and

0:30:13.542 --> 0:30:17.462
<v Speaker 2>I'm not going to get out of this saying no. Well,

0:30:18.182 --> 0:30:20.782
<v Speaker 2>if saying no's making them angry, saying yes is the

0:30:20.822 --> 0:30:23.502
<v Speaker 2>opposite to no. Saying yes can often make the angry

0:30:23.502 --> 0:30:25.622
<v Speaker 2>guy here. Oh hang on, listen, listen, listen. She's keen.

0:30:25.662 --> 0:30:29.622
<v Speaker 2>She's keen. Pull back, pull back what you've won. So

0:30:29.742 --> 0:30:33.542
<v Speaker 2>then often comes a oh sorry, sorry, sorry, yeah I

0:30:33.622 --> 0:30:38.142
<v Speaker 2>got a bit aggressive there. Yeah. Yeah, Now you're in

0:30:38.182 --> 0:30:40.982
<v Speaker 2>a position where you've built yourself a good platform to

0:30:41.022 --> 0:30:42.662
<v Speaker 2>get from where you are to somewhere safe.

0:30:43.902 --> 0:30:46.462
<v Speaker 1>I can imagine that some girls and women would say,

0:30:46.542 --> 0:30:48.302
<v Speaker 1>but if I say yes and I want to take

0:30:48.302 --> 0:30:49.862
<v Speaker 1>this to court, he'll use that against me.

0:30:50.022 --> 0:30:52.182
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, they do, which is great. I want them to

0:30:52.182 --> 0:30:54.902
<v Speaker 2>say that, because that's based on the assumption that when

0:30:54.982 --> 0:30:58.782
<v Speaker 2>you say yes, you've consented. My response to that is

0:30:58.822 --> 0:31:01.902
<v Speaker 2>the word yes doesn't appear in any legal definition of consent.

0:31:02.662 --> 0:31:05.382
<v Speaker 2>But it's a misheld belief that if you utter the

0:31:05.422 --> 0:31:08.382
<v Speaker 2>word yes, you've consented. We'll go to the law and

0:31:08.422 --> 0:31:11.102
<v Speaker 2>show me where that's in consent. He just doesn't even

0:31:11.102 --> 0:31:14.502
<v Speaker 2>get a mention unconsent. Law consent says for you to consent,

0:31:14.542 --> 0:31:17.142
<v Speaker 2>you must give your permission or change your mind freely

0:31:17.822 --> 0:31:21.302
<v Speaker 2>without being subjected to any form of threats, force, violence,

0:31:21.342 --> 0:31:26.142
<v Speaker 2>coercional manipulation. So that strategy is employed as a result

0:31:26.222 --> 0:31:30.542
<v Speaker 2>of saying no and being subjected to what threats? Of course?

0:31:30.742 --> 0:31:34.742
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, so many girls wouldn't for that reason.

0:31:34.942 --> 0:31:36.982
<v Speaker 2>Well that's it. But then when they know that, it's like, ah,

0:31:37.062 --> 0:31:40.142
<v Speaker 2>you've removed another one of those barriers. I spoke to

0:31:40.342 --> 0:31:43.222
<v Speaker 2>just under two hundred boys this morning. Yeah, twelve boys

0:31:43.502 --> 0:31:45.702
<v Speaker 2>school I've been going into for many, many years, and

0:31:45.742 --> 0:31:48.022
<v Speaker 2>these are knock around blokes, you know, big football school,

0:31:48.022 --> 0:31:50.062
<v Speaker 2>the whole one yards. You can't go in there with

0:31:50.102 --> 0:31:51.902
<v Speaker 2>a big stick and crack them over the head and

0:31:51.942 --> 0:31:54.542
<v Speaker 2>say sit down, shut up, because you're all males, you're

0:31:54.582 --> 0:31:57.742
<v Speaker 2>all misogynists, you're all suffering from tosk at masculine. So

0:31:57.782 --> 0:32:00.142
<v Speaker 2>listen to me, because I'll get up on the walkout.

0:32:00.862 --> 0:32:02.542
<v Speaker 2>Because most young men I've met in my life a

0:32:02.622 --> 0:32:06.742
<v Speaker 2>decent human beings, most of them, but some of them aren't.

0:32:07.102 --> 0:32:09.022
<v Speaker 2>But you can't treat all of them like they're bad.

0:32:09.462 --> 0:32:11.382
<v Speaker 2>So you've got to have respet back for the audience

0:32:11.422 --> 0:32:13.142
<v Speaker 2>when you're talking to them. And if you do that,

0:32:14.142 --> 0:32:17.142
<v Speaker 2>then they come forward and they going, oh, this is good.

0:32:17.222 --> 0:32:20.262
<v Speaker 2>No one's ever told us this, no one's ever approached

0:32:20.262 --> 0:32:23.302
<v Speaker 2>it from this perspective. And one of the things I

0:32:23.342 --> 0:32:25.422
<v Speaker 2>said today, I said, now, boys, let's say you were

0:32:25.422 --> 0:32:28.462
<v Speaker 2>to be with somebody having an intimate exchange at the weekend,

0:32:28.462 --> 0:32:30.862
<v Speaker 2>whether that's male to male, male to female, if you're

0:32:30.862 --> 0:32:35.222
<v Speaker 2>initiating some intimacy with that person, you know that they

0:32:35.262 --> 0:32:37.182
<v Speaker 2>have to consent, right, And they go, yeah, of course,

0:32:37.302 --> 0:32:39.742
<v Speaker 2>everyone knows that I said, okay, tell me what do

0:32:39.782 --> 0:32:44.302
<v Speaker 2>they need to say or do to be consenting? And

0:32:44.342 --> 0:32:46.422
<v Speaker 2>the word you get ninety nine percent of the time

0:32:46.502 --> 0:32:49.502
<v Speaker 2>is the word yes. They'll say yes. Sorry when someone

0:32:49.502 --> 0:32:54.102
<v Speaker 2>says yes, that's consent, yep. I said, right, well, boys,

0:32:54.462 --> 0:32:58.342
<v Speaker 2>it's eleven minutes past ten on whatever today's dat is.

0:32:58.382 --> 0:33:01.342
<v Speaker 2>That will be the last time you ever connect the

0:33:01.342 --> 0:33:05.462
<v Speaker 2>word yes to consent, because whoever told you that has

0:33:05.502 --> 0:33:07.302
<v Speaker 2>told you that is not someone you should be taking.

0:33:07.302 --> 0:33:10.302
<v Speaker 2>An I legal advice from the word yes can mean,

0:33:10.342 --> 0:33:14.942
<v Speaker 2>it often does, but this blanket idea that the utterance

0:33:15.222 --> 0:33:18.542
<v Speaker 2>of that word equals consent is an absolute myth. I

0:33:18.622 --> 0:33:20.782
<v Speaker 2>speak to young women every week I've said yes who

0:33:20.782 --> 0:33:23.622
<v Speaker 2>haven't consented. They've said yes because they're frightened. How do

0:33:23.662 --> 0:33:27.022
<v Speaker 2>they get frightened because the other person used pressure against

0:33:27.182 --> 0:33:30.582
<v Speaker 2>verbally physically. So I go back to the boys and

0:33:30.582 --> 0:33:33.662
<v Speaker 2>I say, boys, I have two issues with you, as

0:33:33.702 --> 0:33:37.022
<v Speaker 2>young men believing that the word yes equals consent. The

0:33:37.062 --> 0:33:39.422
<v Speaker 2>first one is you've chosen a word that doesn't exist

0:33:39.422 --> 0:33:42.382
<v Speaker 2>in the legal definition, so you've hung your hat on

0:33:42.422 --> 0:33:47.662
<v Speaker 2>a word that doesn't even exist legally. Secondly, I think

0:33:47.662 --> 0:33:50.102
<v Speaker 2>for some young men, if we mistakenly tell them that

0:33:50.182 --> 0:33:53.422
<v Speaker 2>the word yes, as if by magic, means that whatever's

0:33:53.422 --> 0:33:56.102
<v Speaker 2>happened up to that point is now consent. We're saying

0:33:56.102 --> 0:33:58.862
<v Speaker 2>to those young men, if you're initiating intimacy and you

0:33:58.902 --> 0:34:01.662
<v Speaker 2>hear the word no, let's put a bit of pressure on,

0:34:02.582 --> 0:34:05.462
<v Speaker 2>because you'll make them say yes. But the law says,

0:34:05.582 --> 0:34:07.462
<v Speaker 2>hang on, how'd you get them to say yes? I

0:34:07.542 --> 0:34:09.342
<v Speaker 2>just put a bit of pressure on. How do you

0:34:09.382 --> 0:34:14.382
<v Speaker 2>do that? Threats force, violence, coercion, manipulation. So once the

0:34:14.422 --> 0:34:17.382
<v Speaker 2>boys get that, I say that the most important that

0:34:17.502 --> 0:34:21.182
<v Speaker 2>aspect of consent law is the word freely. So when

0:34:21.182 --> 0:34:24.342
<v Speaker 2>you ask people what consent means. For example, if you

0:34:24.382 --> 0:34:26.222
<v Speaker 2>were to ask, say to young women, tell me what

0:34:26.382 --> 0:34:28.662
<v Speaker 2>consent me So, it's when I do this, it's when

0:34:28.702 --> 0:34:31.902
<v Speaker 2>I do that. Interestingly, that aspect of consent law is

0:34:31.942 --> 0:34:36.062
<v Speaker 2>defined by the other person, because if you or I

0:34:36.102 --> 0:34:39.662
<v Speaker 2>are investigating from a sex crime perspective, whether this young

0:34:39.702 --> 0:34:42.902
<v Speaker 2>woman consented or not, we don't define her consent by

0:34:42.902 --> 0:34:44.062
<v Speaker 2>the fact that she said yes.

0:34:45.222 --> 0:34:47.102
<v Speaker 1>It's her actions, it's her behavior.

0:34:47.262 --> 0:34:49.822
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's more than that, it's whether she was allowed

0:34:49.862 --> 0:34:53.222
<v Speaker 2>to take those actions freely. Yeah, because she could say oh,

0:34:53.262 --> 0:34:56.022
<v Speaker 2>I said yes, and then she goes, I did that

0:34:56.022 --> 0:34:58.142
<v Speaker 2>because he had a knife to my throat. Oh that's

0:34:58.182 --> 0:35:01.062
<v Speaker 2>not consent. Well, see, we haven't asked enough questions, have

0:35:01.142 --> 0:35:04.502
<v Speaker 2>we We don't define whether this young person is consented

0:35:04.542 --> 0:35:06.342
<v Speaker 2>because of what they say, because of what they did,

0:35:06.382 --> 0:35:09.102
<v Speaker 2>or whether they change their mind. We must ask one

0:35:09.102 --> 0:35:11.262
<v Speaker 2>more question. Did they say it, do it? Or change

0:35:11.302 --> 0:35:14.062
<v Speaker 2>their mind freely? Now what does that mean? Well, that

0:35:14.222 --> 0:35:17.222
<v Speaker 2>means that we're now looking at this person. Did they

0:35:17.302 --> 0:35:20.862
<v Speaker 2>allow them to do that freely? What does that mean? Legally?

0:35:20.982 --> 0:35:26.022
<v Speaker 2>Without using threats force, violence, coercional manipulation, the Ted Bundy's,

0:35:26.062 --> 0:35:30.902
<v Speaker 2>the Joseph Thompson's, they use physical violence, but date rape

0:35:30.942 --> 0:35:35.422
<v Speaker 2>is far more likely to be coercive, verbal, psychological, And

0:35:35.462 --> 0:35:37.942
<v Speaker 2>even that too many people comes as a bit of

0:35:37.942 --> 0:35:42.582
<v Speaker 2>a surprise because we think the only thing that negates

0:35:42.742 --> 0:35:47.662
<v Speaker 2>consent is physical threats of force. No coercion manipulation sits

0:35:47.662 --> 0:35:48.862
<v Speaker 2>on the same plane. Legally.

0:35:54.542 --> 0:35:58.382
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to true crime conversations with me, Jemma Bath,

0:35:58.982 --> 0:36:08.142
<v Speaker 1>I'm speaking with Brent Sanders. You said you've had women

0:36:08.142 --> 0:36:12.342
<v Speaker 1>come forward after your seminars and tell you about their experiences.

0:36:12.382 --> 0:36:14.942
<v Speaker 1>What about men and boys. Have they come forward and

0:36:14.942 --> 0:36:18.222
<v Speaker 1>told you the opposite, not that they've been assaulted, that

0:36:18.262 --> 0:36:19.302
<v Speaker 1>they have assaulted.

0:36:20.102 --> 0:36:22.862
<v Speaker 2>I've had men come forward who've been sexually assaulted, just

0:36:22.902 --> 0:36:25.342
<v Speaker 2>to clarify that, yes, it doesn't happen nearly as much

0:36:25.342 --> 0:36:27.142
<v Speaker 2>because the age group that I talk to the high

0:36:27.222 --> 0:36:30.142
<v Speaker 2>risk gauge for males for sexual crime as primary school,

0:36:30.222 --> 0:36:32.342
<v Speaker 2>and I don't do any talks in primary school. The

0:36:32.422 --> 0:36:35.142
<v Speaker 2>highest risk gauge group for girls and women is fifteen

0:36:35.182 --> 0:36:37.902
<v Speaker 2>to twenty one, which is ninety nine percent of my attendees.

0:36:38.262 --> 0:36:40.622
<v Speaker 2>And the people committing those offenses are young men of

0:36:40.662 --> 0:36:43.142
<v Speaker 2>similar age who they know socially. So your questions are a

0:36:43.142 --> 0:36:47.062
<v Speaker 2>really good one. Look, respectfully, it's quite rare for guys

0:36:47.102 --> 0:36:48.622
<v Speaker 2>to come forward and admit to me as an ex

0:36:48.702 --> 0:36:51.302
<v Speaker 2>copper that they've committed a sex offense. Yeah, it's very

0:36:51.302 --> 0:36:53.782
<v Speaker 2>common for guys to come forward. A bit sheepishly saying

0:36:53.822 --> 0:36:58.422
<v Speaker 2>I had absolutely no idea of the legal test for

0:36:58.502 --> 0:37:01.822
<v Speaker 2>drunkenness of when if someone says yes, that's not always

0:37:02.382 --> 0:37:05.342
<v Speaker 2>so they're not taking that next step so much.

0:37:06.022 --> 0:37:07.542
<v Speaker 1>The fact they've even come up to you and said

0:37:07.582 --> 0:37:09.222
<v Speaker 1>that they didn't know is a big step.

0:37:09.662 --> 0:37:12.102
<v Speaker 2>I can't remember the last time I did a seminar

0:37:12.142 --> 0:37:15.982
<v Speaker 2>without students coming forward. But depending on the gender and

0:37:16.022 --> 0:37:19.022
<v Speaker 2>the seminar depends on the reason they come forward. So

0:37:19.382 --> 0:37:23.222
<v Speaker 2>twenty nine years, I'd be hard pressed remembering a seminar

0:37:23.262 --> 0:37:25.342
<v Speaker 2>are presented to young women in year ten, eleven or

0:37:25.342 --> 0:37:28.582
<v Speaker 2>twelve without young women coming forward who've been subjected to

0:37:28.622 --> 0:37:31.942
<v Speaker 2>sexual crime. When I speak to young men, they come forward,

0:37:32.382 --> 0:37:35.102
<v Speaker 2>and they often come forward very genuinely. I don't want

0:37:35.142 --> 0:37:38.142
<v Speaker 2>to sound like a TOSSI, but they come forward just

0:37:38.142 --> 0:37:40.342
<v Speaker 2>to shake your hand and say, I've never had a

0:37:40.422 --> 0:37:43.182
<v Speaker 2>talk like this. No one's told me this stuff before.

0:37:43.742 --> 0:37:46.782
<v Speaker 2>There's sometimes a bit of an assumption that when young

0:37:46.822 --> 0:37:48.822
<v Speaker 2>people get to a certain age, as if by magic,

0:37:48.862 --> 0:37:51.982
<v Speaker 2>they'll just know this. Like, you get to year twelve,

0:37:52.022 --> 0:37:55.262
<v Speaker 2>you'll know how to wire up a house electrically. No

0:37:55.422 --> 0:37:57.502
<v Speaker 2>you won't. You get to year twelve, you'll know the

0:37:57.582 --> 0:37:59.902
<v Speaker 2>definition of consent? Really, who's told.

0:37:59.622 --> 0:38:04.622
<v Speaker 1>You apart from some biology class like you mentioned before,

0:38:04.662 --> 0:38:05.622
<v Speaker 1>a bit of sex ads.

0:38:05.742 --> 0:38:07.542
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but the problem of the biology class is all

0:38:07.542 --> 0:38:10.382
<v Speaker 2>the terms are using it from a biological textbook. So's

0:38:10.422 --> 0:38:12.142
<v Speaker 2>it's the thing, you know, all these kids know the

0:38:12.182 --> 0:38:14.742
<v Speaker 2>definition of sexual intercourse, but the definition they know is

0:38:14.782 --> 0:38:17.142
<v Speaker 2>from a biology textbook and that bears no resemblance to

0:38:17.182 --> 0:38:20.982
<v Speaker 2>the legal definition. That's one of the major contributing factors

0:38:21.622 --> 0:38:24.222
<v Speaker 2>to young women I speak to who have been subjected

0:38:24.262 --> 0:38:27.862
<v Speaker 2>to sexual intercourse without consent, and they didn't know until

0:38:27.862 --> 0:38:30.262
<v Speaker 2>they sat in the talk, And the moment in the

0:38:30.302 --> 0:38:32.382
<v Speaker 2>talk that most of them realize is when I share

0:38:32.382 --> 0:38:35.742
<v Speaker 2>with them the legal definition, and it's so different to

0:38:35.782 --> 0:38:36.382
<v Speaker 2>what they thought.

0:38:36.542 --> 0:38:38.622
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure we have listeners that don't know. Can you

0:38:38.702 --> 0:38:39.182
<v Speaker 1>tell them?

0:38:39.342 --> 0:38:41.742
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to paraphrase a little because I deliver talks

0:38:41.742 --> 0:38:43.782
<v Speaker 2>in every state and territory. So last week I delivered

0:38:43.782 --> 0:38:47.422
<v Speaker 2>talks in Canberra, Brisbane and Sydney. Right, they all have

0:38:47.542 --> 0:38:50.582
<v Speaker 2>different crimes acts, all different pieces of legislation, but they're

0:38:50.622 --> 0:38:53.702
<v Speaker 2>all pretty much the same. We get some different terminology,

0:38:53.782 --> 0:38:57.262
<v Speaker 2>we have some slightly different maximum sentences and stuff around that,

0:38:57.302 --> 0:38:59.982
<v Speaker 2>but when you actually look at definition, it's pretty uniform.

0:39:00.142 --> 0:39:02.942
<v Speaker 2>So if you look at the definition of sexual intercourse,

0:39:03.102 --> 0:39:06.502
<v Speaker 2>so we apply that to sexual intercourse without consent, right,

0:39:07.422 --> 0:39:10.102
<v Speaker 2>most people think are sexual intercourse. I know what that is.

0:39:10.542 --> 0:39:15.022
<v Speaker 2>That's penole penetration for pro creation. That's the biological definition,

0:39:15.142 --> 0:39:18.662
<v Speaker 2>or if you go to a religious school, it's a

0:39:18.702 --> 0:39:21.382
<v Speaker 2>theological definition, and that's cool. I got no problem with that.

0:39:21.662 --> 0:39:24.302
<v Speaker 2>But they're often really surprised to hear the legal definition.

0:39:24.822 --> 0:39:27.062
<v Speaker 2>And in every state and territory in Australia, the legal

0:39:27.102 --> 0:39:30.142
<v Speaker 2>definition of sexual intercourse and I'm going to paraphrase it little,

0:39:30.582 --> 0:39:34.062
<v Speaker 2>it's penetration to a sexual area with anything at all.

0:39:34.502 --> 0:39:36.822
<v Speaker 2>So straight away, and we're only a fraction of the

0:39:36.822 --> 0:39:40.022
<v Speaker 2>way through the definition. Straight away there people hear that going, oh,

0:39:40.102 --> 0:39:43.582
<v Speaker 2>hang on, what no, no, no, no, intercourse can only

0:39:43.622 --> 0:39:48.222
<v Speaker 2>be penole penetration or that's your biology class. Ye, wrong book,

0:39:48.462 --> 0:39:51.622
<v Speaker 2>wrong definition. So the law says a person has had

0:39:51.782 --> 0:39:54.582
<v Speaker 2>sexual intercourse with another person the moment they penetrate that

0:39:54.662 --> 0:39:58.982
<v Speaker 2>person to a sexual area with anything at all, any

0:39:59.062 --> 0:40:02.382
<v Speaker 2>part of an offender's body, anything held or manipulated by

0:40:02.382 --> 0:40:06.382
<v Speaker 2>the offender, and it keeps going. Every state and territory

0:40:06.382 --> 0:40:09.622
<v Speaker 2>in Australia also goes on to say sexual intercourse also

0:40:09.702 --> 0:40:13.222
<v Speaker 2>includes the act performing oral sex. Now New South Wales,

0:40:13.342 --> 0:40:16.782
<v Speaker 2>forced oral sex is legally defined or articulated in a

0:40:16.822 --> 0:40:19.422
<v Speaker 2>courtroom as being the introduction of the penis to the

0:40:19.502 --> 0:40:23.182
<v Speaker 2>mouth without full consent. So when you put that out

0:40:23.182 --> 0:40:25.862
<v Speaker 2>in front of a couple of hundred young men, you

0:40:25.902 --> 0:40:29.062
<v Speaker 2>can hear a pin drop because they're going, wow, I

0:40:29.062 --> 0:40:32.782
<v Speaker 2>didn't know that. Two most common forms of intercourse without

0:40:32.822 --> 0:40:36.062
<v Speaker 2>consent committed against young women in that high riskauge group

0:40:36.102 --> 0:40:41.022
<v Speaker 2>fifteen to twenty one. Number one is penetration sexually by

0:40:41.022 --> 0:40:44.062
<v Speaker 2>guy using his fingers without consent. Most young women who

0:40:44.102 --> 0:40:46.342
<v Speaker 2>are subjected to that are told by well meaning friends,

0:40:46.382 --> 0:40:49.582
<v Speaker 2>oh my god, that's awful. That's terrible. What an asshole.

0:40:49.622 --> 0:40:52.022
<v Speaker 2>Thank god he didn't rape you. That's one good thing.

0:40:52.862 --> 0:40:55.662
<v Speaker 2>And that advice is given with really good intent because

0:40:55.702 --> 0:40:59.222
<v Speaker 2>they're listening to their friend's story and they're running it

0:40:59.302 --> 0:41:02.782
<v Speaker 2>through their definition of sexual intercourse, which comes from page

0:41:02.862 --> 0:41:08.182
<v Speaker 2>seventy six of the year twelve biology textbook. So because

0:41:08.222 --> 0:41:11.022
<v Speaker 2>what happened to their friend doesn't fit into that exceedingly

0:41:11.142 --> 0:41:14.262
<v Speaker 2>narrow definition, that means it's not intercourse, So it can't

0:41:14.262 --> 0:41:16.542
<v Speaker 2>be intercourse without consent, so it's not rape.

0:41:17.102 --> 0:41:19.422
<v Speaker 1>But to be clear, what you're saying is it is rape.

0:41:19.542 --> 0:41:23.782
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's the number one most common form because if

0:41:23.822 --> 0:41:27.022
<v Speaker 2>a person penetrates another person's sexu with their fingers without

0:41:27.102 --> 0:41:30.982
<v Speaker 2>their consent. That's sexual intercourse without consent, second most common

0:41:31.022 --> 0:41:34.462
<v Speaker 2>form of intercourse without consent that young women are subjected

0:41:34.502 --> 0:41:37.182
<v Speaker 2>to it. It's been forced into performing oral sex. Oral

0:41:37.222 --> 0:41:41.862
<v Speaker 2>sex is so far beyond most people's inclusion in that

0:41:42.382 --> 0:41:45.062
<v Speaker 2>term sexual intercourse, it's not even on the radar. It's

0:41:45.102 --> 0:41:48.062
<v Speaker 2>the second most common form of intercourse without consent. So

0:41:49.342 --> 0:41:51.782
<v Speaker 2>it's important for young men to hear this. Yeah, it's

0:41:51.782 --> 0:41:54.582
<v Speaker 2>important for young women to hear this because the language

0:41:54.582 --> 0:41:58.142
<v Speaker 2>around this dumbs it down. So I know, I didn't

0:41:58.142 --> 0:42:00.302
<v Speaker 2>have sex with her. I just sort of touched her

0:42:00.382 --> 0:42:03.102
<v Speaker 2>up a bit. Classic term from someone on the other

0:42:03.142 --> 0:42:05.782
<v Speaker 2>side of an interview desk who's touching her up a

0:42:05.782 --> 0:42:07.302
<v Speaker 2>bit means oh, yeah, she was saying no, she was

0:42:07.342 --> 0:42:10.022
<v Speaker 2>pushing my hand away, but I sort of penetrated her

0:42:10.022 --> 0:42:11.822
<v Speaker 2>with my finger is a bit, because yeah, she was

0:42:11.862 --> 0:42:14.502
<v Speaker 2>saying no. She wasn't that keen, but I figured maybe

0:42:14.542 --> 0:42:16.862
<v Speaker 2>if she might change her mind. Now you run that

0:42:16.902 --> 0:42:21.142
<v Speaker 2>through legal definition, sexual intercourse without consent. I mean, even

0:42:21.182 --> 0:42:22.702
<v Speaker 2>that term rape, it's an awful term.

0:42:22.782 --> 0:42:23.102
<v Speaker 1>It is.

0:42:23.182 --> 0:42:26.822
<v Speaker 2>It's an awful term. People associate that with intercourse without consent.

0:42:26.862 --> 0:42:28.782
<v Speaker 2>Of course they do. You can't even be charged with

0:42:28.902 --> 0:42:30.622
<v Speaker 2>rape in New South Wales. There's no such a fense

0:42:30.662 --> 0:42:34.062
<v Speaker 2>that crime doesn't even exist. That word has not existed

0:42:34.142 --> 0:42:38.342
<v Speaker 2>legally in New South Wales since September nineteen eighty one,

0:42:39.902 --> 0:42:42.622
<v Speaker 2>So it makes people think, bloody hell, what else don't

0:42:42.662 --> 0:42:44.742
<v Speaker 2>I know? Now? You can be charged with rape in

0:42:44.782 --> 0:42:47.862
<v Speaker 2>two states in Australia, Victorian and Queensland, but no other

0:42:47.902 --> 0:42:50.342
<v Speaker 2>state or territory New South Wales. The term rape was

0:42:50.382 --> 0:42:53.062
<v Speaker 2>replaced by the term sexual assault forty three years ago.

0:42:53.582 --> 0:42:56.142
<v Speaker 2>So it gets sort of interesting when you get into

0:42:56.142 --> 0:42:58.382
<v Speaker 2>that discussion with people all these terms that they're so

0:42:58.502 --> 0:43:01.422
<v Speaker 2>familiar with, but they don't actually know what they mean.

0:43:01.902 --> 0:43:04.302
<v Speaker 2>You know, like drunk person can't cossent, brilliant, what does

0:43:04.342 --> 0:43:08.542
<v Speaker 2>that mean? Ask year twelve students today, you're at a party.

0:43:09.062 --> 0:43:10.822
<v Speaker 2>You know that there's a drunk person part of they

0:43:10.862 --> 0:43:13.942
<v Speaker 2>can't consent. What's the test to determine how drunk they are? Oh,

0:43:13.982 --> 0:43:19.862
<v Speaker 2>it's a breathalyzer. What's not we do get a freaking

0:43:19.902 --> 0:43:23.822
<v Speaker 2>breathalyzer from And what's the breathalyzer level that someone has

0:43:23.902 --> 0:43:26.262
<v Speaker 2>to fail to not be able to consent? See, that's

0:43:26.302 --> 0:43:28.822
<v Speaker 2>just a myth. So what our brain does it says, oh,

0:43:29.022 --> 0:43:31.262
<v Speaker 2>I know the test for drunkenness. It's a breathalyzer. Well,

0:43:31.262 --> 0:43:34.422
<v Speaker 2>it's a driving test. There's a specific test for consent.

0:43:35.262 --> 0:43:38.382
<v Speaker 2>But all the young people I speak to pretty much

0:43:38.462 --> 0:43:41.182
<v Speaker 2>know a drunk person can't consent. Most of them don't

0:43:41.222 --> 0:43:43.822
<v Speaker 2>know what that means. Biggest study to come out of

0:43:44.022 --> 0:43:46.222
<v Speaker 2>a strong universities more recently is telling us up to

0:43:46.342 --> 0:43:49.782
<v Speaker 2>ninety percent of young women in high risk gauge they

0:43:49.782 --> 0:43:52.662
<v Speaker 2>senior high school that have a sexual offense committed against

0:43:52.662 --> 0:43:55.702
<v Speaker 2>them last weekend, they will be too affected by alcohol

0:43:55.782 --> 0:43:58.102
<v Speaker 2>or drugs to be able to legally provide consent nine

0:43:58.142 --> 0:44:03.502
<v Speaker 2>times out of ten. But ninety nine percent of students

0:44:03.502 --> 0:44:07.302
<v Speaker 2>in those environments don't know what the actual legal test is.

0:44:07.502 --> 0:44:08.542
<v Speaker 1>So what's the legal test.

0:44:08.582 --> 0:44:11.902
<v Speaker 2>It's an observational test. That's how it's presented in the law.

0:44:12.262 --> 0:44:14.582
<v Speaker 2>The law says to consent, a person must be sober,

0:44:15.342 --> 0:44:17.462
<v Speaker 2>you know, there must be in a sober state of mind.

0:44:17.702 --> 0:44:19.182
<v Speaker 2>And then it goes on to say a person is

0:44:19.222 --> 0:44:23.222
<v Speaker 2>no longer sober enough to consent once they've consumed enough

0:44:23.222 --> 0:44:25.822
<v Speaker 2>alcohol or drugs, that they are clearly showing the effects

0:44:25.862 --> 0:44:28.142
<v Speaker 2>of drugs or alcohol, and they could be observed by

0:44:28.182 --> 0:44:32.302
<v Speaker 2>any reasonable person. So that's the law. It's the same

0:44:32.342 --> 0:44:36.142
<v Speaker 2>as the RSA test, the responsible service of alcohol test,

0:44:36.222 --> 0:44:38.862
<v Speaker 2>that is identical to the test to consent. You fail

0:44:38.902 --> 0:44:41.742
<v Speaker 2>them the same way. So we all know that if

0:44:41.782 --> 0:44:43.662
<v Speaker 2>you've had a few too many drinks and you try

0:44:43.702 --> 0:44:45.982
<v Speaker 2>to get into a pub, generally the person on their

0:44:45.982 --> 0:44:48.022
<v Speaker 2>will say no, I'm sorry. It's not like you've done

0:44:48.022 --> 0:44:50.622
<v Speaker 2>anything wrong. It's just they'll lose their job if they

0:44:50.662 --> 0:44:53.102
<v Speaker 2>let you in because you fail the RSA. How do

0:44:53.142 --> 0:44:55.782
<v Speaker 2>you fail the RSA when you're clearly showing the effects

0:44:55.822 --> 0:44:58.742
<v Speaker 2>of alcoholic drugs that can be observed by any reasonable person. Now,

0:44:58.742 --> 0:45:03.022
<v Speaker 2>in that case, the reasonable person's the dormant. When detectives

0:45:03.182 --> 0:45:07.262
<v Speaker 2>from sex crimes investigate, say, allegations of a sexual offense

0:45:07.262 --> 0:45:09.502
<v Speaker 2>they committed at a party or something such as that

0:45:09.902 --> 0:45:13.182
<v Speaker 2>the off and looking at circumstances where somebody is too

0:45:13.342 --> 0:45:16.982
<v Speaker 2>drunk or drug effected to give consent, you can apply

0:45:17.022 --> 0:45:19.222
<v Speaker 2>the test anyone in that room that you can clearly

0:45:19.262 --> 0:45:21.582
<v Speaker 2>see is affected by a color of drugs, And the

0:45:21.662 --> 0:45:25.422
<v Speaker 2>legal test is the physical effects, verbal or cognitive or combination.

0:45:25.622 --> 0:45:28.062
<v Speaker 2>This is what a judge tells a jury in a courtroom.

0:45:28.382 --> 0:45:30.542
<v Speaker 2>But we've got to give this information to the kids

0:45:30.582 --> 0:45:31.982
<v Speaker 2>going out to parties this weekend.

0:45:33.142 --> 0:45:34.902
<v Speaker 1>Do you think that by giving them all of these

0:45:34.942 --> 0:45:38.142
<v Speaker 1>legal definitions, what's it going to do? Is it scaring them?

0:45:38.302 --> 0:45:41.382
<v Speaker 2>No, it's not scaring them. It's giving them the information

0:45:41.422 --> 0:45:44.342
<v Speaker 2>they're entitled to. So my job is to go in

0:45:44.382 --> 0:45:46.062
<v Speaker 2>and say, if you choose to have a few drinks

0:45:46.102 --> 0:45:49.582
<v Speaker 2>at part is, if you choose to initiate an intimate exchange,

0:45:49.702 --> 0:45:53.222
<v Speaker 2>or you are comfortable having somebody initiated an intimate exchange

0:45:53.222 --> 0:45:56.822
<v Speaker 2>with you, that's fine. But if you're in that environment,

0:45:56.822 --> 0:45:59.382
<v Speaker 2>you're entitled to know this stuff. Because if you don't

0:45:59.422 --> 0:46:01.662
<v Speaker 2>know this stuff, how do you know whether you've given consent?

0:46:02.022 --> 0:46:04.142
<v Speaker 2>How do you know whether you have consent? How do

0:46:04.182 --> 0:46:06.942
<v Speaker 2>you know if that person's had too many drinks to

0:46:07.062 --> 0:46:08.862
<v Speaker 2>fail the test? If you don't know what the test is,

0:46:09.342 --> 0:46:11.702
<v Speaker 2>how do you know if you've had sex intercourse with somebody?

0:46:11.742 --> 0:46:15.382
<v Speaker 2>If your definition comes from a biology textbook, See so it's.

0:46:15.222 --> 0:46:17.342
<v Speaker 1>Knowledge and say knowledge is power.

0:46:17.462 --> 0:46:18.982
<v Speaker 2>Well it is, and if you do it in the

0:46:19.062 --> 0:46:22.662
<v Speaker 2>right way, I think I hope people can walk out

0:46:22.702 --> 0:46:25.342
<v Speaker 2>going oh okay, I knew some of that stuff, but

0:46:25.382 --> 0:46:27.342
<v Speaker 2>the stuff I didn't know makes a big difference to

0:46:27.382 --> 0:46:29.502
<v Speaker 2>how I look at it. And you know, none of

0:46:29.542 --> 0:46:32.502
<v Speaker 2>this stuff is rocket science. When you know this stuff,

0:46:32.542 --> 0:46:34.862
<v Speaker 2>it makes so much sense. Like when you know that

0:46:34.942 --> 0:46:38.302
<v Speaker 2>the utterance of the word yes doesn't equal consent, it's like, well,

0:46:38.302 --> 0:46:41.502
<v Speaker 2>of course it doesn't. I have helping young guys. Stay

0:46:41.502 --> 0:46:43.902
<v Speaker 2>to me. You be hand one. So are you saying,

0:46:43.942 --> 0:46:48.822
<v Speaker 2>then when someone changes their mind from no to yes

0:46:48.902 --> 0:46:53.262
<v Speaker 2>or no to whatever, that's consent. Yeah, So okay, Well

0:46:53.342 --> 0:46:55.942
<v Speaker 2>let's put that into practice. So I'll say, okay, let's

0:46:55.942 --> 0:47:00.222
<v Speaker 2>appride that principle. Give me ten dollars, to which they'll

0:47:00.262 --> 0:47:02.942
<v Speaker 2>say no. I'll say, well, hang on, do you have

0:47:03.022 --> 0:47:07.542
<v Speaker 2>ten dollars? Yeah, well give it to me. No, And

0:47:07.582 --> 0:47:09.702
<v Speaker 2>then I might get a bit theatrical and go, well,

0:47:09.902 --> 0:47:12.382
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to out to three and if that ten

0:47:12.462 --> 0:47:14.702
<v Speaker 2>dollars is not in my pocket, what if I start

0:47:14.902 --> 0:47:17.302
<v Speaker 2>hitting you something? And I said, I reckon, Tom, I'll

0:47:17.302 --> 0:47:18.822
<v Speaker 2>get to about two, the wall beout, and you'll give

0:47:18.822 --> 0:47:22.502
<v Speaker 2>me the money. Don't let anyone tell you consented. That's

0:47:22.542 --> 0:47:26.022
<v Speaker 2>a robbery. You changed your mind, but you didn't change

0:47:26.062 --> 0:47:28.742
<v Speaker 2>it freely. You changed it because of the pressure. I applied.

0:47:29.182 --> 0:47:32.382
<v Speaker 2>Exact same principle applies to your actions towards someone an

0:47:32.422 --> 0:47:35.102
<v Speaker 2>intimate exchange, So the penny starts to drop.

0:47:36.102 --> 0:47:38.902
<v Speaker 1>There's no doubt the last few years we've seen such

0:47:39.742 --> 0:47:46.502
<v Speaker 1>an uproar about sexual violence and things that women go through,

0:47:46.542 --> 0:47:49.342
<v Speaker 1>even just sexual harassment in workplaces, that kind of thing.

0:47:49.982 --> 0:47:51.862
<v Speaker 1>Do you think this is the way we help change it?

0:47:52.062 --> 0:47:55.382
<v Speaker 1>By getting to these schools and teaching these boys legal definitions,

0:47:55.422 --> 0:47:56.662
<v Speaker 1>teaching these girls knowledge.

0:47:56.822 --> 0:48:00.422
<v Speaker 2>It's the alternative, don't teach it. See. I spend about

0:48:00.462 --> 0:48:04.422
<v Speaker 2>half of my time lecturing and corporations on harassment, sexual harassment, bullying.

0:48:04.502 --> 0:48:07.342
<v Speaker 2>I do investigations and things such as that. Right, I've

0:48:07.382 --> 0:48:09.742
<v Speaker 2>done that for twenty five years along with this work.

0:48:10.542 --> 0:48:13.262
<v Speaker 2>Sexual harassment is still the number one most common form

0:48:13.422 --> 0:48:17.182
<v Speaker 2>of an appropriate workplace conduct in the Australian workplace, and

0:48:17.222 --> 0:48:19.102
<v Speaker 2>it has been for the twenty five years that I've

0:48:19.102 --> 0:48:24.662
<v Speaker 2>done these talks. But we have dramatically reduced the amount

0:48:24.942 --> 0:48:28.182
<v Speaker 2>of inappropriate workplace conduct. There's no argument. So if we

0:48:28.222 --> 0:48:32.742
<v Speaker 2>go back twenty five years to today, today's workplace is

0:48:33.462 --> 0:48:37.982
<v Speaker 2>generally a lot better. The expectations are higher, policies are better,

0:48:38.022 --> 0:48:40.822
<v Speaker 2>implementation of policies are better all that type of thing,

0:48:41.502 --> 0:48:45.862
<v Speaker 2>but we still recognize that, for example, sexual harassment is

0:48:46.182 --> 0:48:48.982
<v Speaker 2>number one. Now, sex harassment doesn't have to be male

0:48:49.062 --> 0:48:52.422
<v Speaker 2>to female. It usually is, though, but nothing in policy

0:48:52.622 --> 0:48:55.302
<v Speaker 2>says that sexual harassment is really just a sub section

0:48:55.382 --> 0:49:00.542
<v Speaker 2>of workplace harassment. Yeah, so it's uninvited, unwelcome, unreciprocated behavior

0:49:00.982 --> 0:49:05.182
<v Speaker 2>of a sexual nature that makes somebody feel offended, intimidated

0:49:05.262 --> 0:49:09.462
<v Speaker 2>human in a workspace. It's still the most common, but

0:49:09.582 --> 0:49:11.982
<v Speaker 2>it is far less less common than what it once was.

0:49:12.062 --> 0:49:14.702
<v Speaker 2>So we're making headway, we're making moves, But just to

0:49:14.782 --> 0:49:17.822
<v Speaker 2>your point, you need to be really careful assuming that

0:49:17.902 --> 0:49:20.822
<v Speaker 2>your staff that come into your workplace know all these

0:49:20.822 --> 0:49:23.782
<v Speaker 2>policies because they don't teach them at school, they don't

0:49:23.782 --> 0:49:27.582
<v Speaker 2>teach them at university. And a lot of young kids

0:49:27.582 --> 0:49:29.742
<v Speaker 2>that will go to UNI, they're coming into the workplace

0:49:29.782 --> 0:49:32.542
<v Speaker 2>twenty three, twenty four. It's their first job. But because

0:49:32.542 --> 0:49:36.342
<v Speaker 2>they're twenty three or twenty four, sometimes their employers think, oh,

0:49:36.422 --> 0:49:40.022
<v Speaker 2>they'll know all this. They don't know it. So you

0:49:40.102 --> 0:49:42.182
<v Speaker 2>make a really good point. The more training that we

0:49:42.262 --> 0:49:44.942
<v Speaker 2>can do, the more people are able to identify these

0:49:44.982 --> 0:49:48.942
<v Speaker 2>behaviors call them out, but also regulate themselves, because there's

0:49:48.942 --> 0:49:51.462
<v Speaker 2>a big push in the Australian workplace to get staff

0:49:51.502 --> 0:49:54.782
<v Speaker 2>to call out harassment bullying. But you've got to make

0:49:54.782 --> 0:49:57.502
<v Speaker 2>sure your staff know what the definitions of those terms are,

0:49:57.782 --> 0:50:01.662
<v Speaker 2>because most of them don't know. If people have more knowledge,

0:50:01.742 --> 0:50:05.142
<v Speaker 2>the choices that they're making are more informed on both

0:50:05.182 --> 0:50:08.662
<v Speaker 2>sides of the equation with regard to their conduct, but also,

0:50:08.782 --> 0:50:12.222
<v Speaker 2>perhaps just as importantly, with regard to being able to

0:50:12.302 --> 0:50:15.382
<v Speaker 2>identify conduct directed to them as being Hang on, now,

0:50:15.422 --> 0:50:17.942
<v Speaker 2>I don't have to cop that that's harassment. That's whatever

0:50:17.982 --> 0:50:20.062
<v Speaker 2>it is. I'm going to call that out. But if

0:50:20.062 --> 0:50:22.662
<v Speaker 2>you're not sure what it is, if no one's told

0:50:22.702 --> 0:50:25.062
<v Speaker 2>you the definition, all the definition's wrong, you're going to

0:50:25.102 --> 0:50:27.862
<v Speaker 2>sit back on your heels. It's the same principle as

0:50:28.422 --> 0:50:31.582
<v Speaker 2>young women who aren't told the offense, like unlawful sexual

0:50:31.622 --> 0:50:35.022
<v Speaker 2>touching and stuff. It happens the people who do it,

0:50:35.062 --> 0:50:38.462
<v Speaker 2>usually young men, do it repeatedly. The girls speak to

0:50:38.502 --> 0:50:40.222
<v Speaker 2>their girlfriends about it, and they're from toil. I don't

0:50:40.222 --> 0:50:41.902
<v Speaker 2>worry about him. He's just an asshole. He does that

0:50:42.022 --> 0:50:44.622
<v Speaker 2>to everybody. Then they'll go in one of the talks

0:50:44.662 --> 0:50:46.742
<v Speaker 2>and suddenly realize this stuff that's happening to me is

0:50:46.742 --> 0:50:48.982
<v Speaker 2>a criminal offense, and each time someone does it in

0:50:49.062 --> 0:50:51.902
<v Speaker 2>you South Wales, it carries a five year imprisonment to him. Okay,

0:50:52.022 --> 0:50:56.062
<v Speaker 2>maybe I will speak out about it so knowledge is powered.

0:50:56.462 --> 0:50:58.302
<v Speaker 1>I want to finish by going to the other end

0:50:58.342 --> 0:51:00.542
<v Speaker 1>of the scale. Yeah, you talk about this in your book,

0:51:00.582 --> 0:51:02.942
<v Speaker 1>and I understand you probably don't put this into practice anymore.

0:51:03.062 --> 0:51:08.422
<v Speaker 1>But if someone is confronted with the worst of the worst,

0:51:08.542 --> 0:51:12.662
<v Speaker 1>someone is physically trying to attack them, how do you

0:51:12.742 --> 0:51:16.462
<v Speaker 1>protect yourself, especially as a woman to a man. I've

0:51:16.542 --> 0:51:19.382
<v Speaker 1>read you saying things like you hate that women are

0:51:19.422 --> 0:51:22.302
<v Speaker 1>made to feel like because they're not physically big enough,

0:51:22.502 --> 0:51:25.702
<v Speaker 1>they can't protect themselves. So how do they protect themselves?

0:51:25.702 --> 0:51:27.382
<v Speaker 2>Well, look, the only way I could answer that is

0:51:27.422 --> 0:51:30.542
<v Speaker 2>if you or my daughter asking me, who's about your size?

0:51:30.582 --> 0:51:32.382
<v Speaker 2>My daughter, you know, if she said to me, Dad,

0:51:33.262 --> 0:51:35.782
<v Speaker 2>if someone grabs me, and I have two options to

0:51:35.902 --> 0:51:38.742
<v Speaker 2>either stay where I am or or fight back, how

0:51:38.782 --> 0:51:41.942
<v Speaker 2>do I defend myself? Well, I guess to answer the question,

0:51:42.262 --> 0:51:44.902
<v Speaker 2>the idea that self defense means you have to overpower

0:51:45.022 --> 0:51:48.622
<v Speaker 2>somebody is a myth, you know, just ask anyone who's

0:51:48.662 --> 0:51:53.582
<v Speaker 2>done martial arts. Martial arts have been around four thousands

0:51:53.622 --> 0:51:57.422
<v Speaker 2>of years. There's not one There's not one martial art

0:51:57.662 --> 0:52:00.142
<v Speaker 2>that you and I could study anywhere in the world

0:52:00.302 --> 0:52:03.022
<v Speaker 2>that will teach us how to overparent attack it. So

0:52:03.102 --> 0:52:05.662
<v Speaker 2>if we look at martial arts as being the sort

0:52:05.662 --> 0:52:09.182
<v Speaker 2>of the Dawan of physical self defense, because it's got

0:52:09.182 --> 0:52:12.462
<v Speaker 2>a thousand years of his behind it, how come not

0:52:12.702 --> 0:52:16.742
<v Speaker 2>one martial arts teaches how to overparent attacker because that's

0:52:16.822 --> 0:52:19.742
<v Speaker 2>the total opposite to what self defense is. So, and

0:52:19.862 --> 0:52:22.422
<v Speaker 2>this is a really important message for women to hear

0:52:22.702 --> 0:52:27.022
<v Speaker 2>because generally, not exclusively, but generally, if a woman is

0:52:27.102 --> 0:52:29.702
<v Speaker 2>in a physical confrontation with a male, the male will

0:52:29.822 --> 0:52:33.542
<v Speaker 2>generally be larger and probably physically stronger. So if you

0:52:33.662 --> 0:52:38.062
<v Speaker 2>go into that thinking I can't defend myself because I

0:52:38.182 --> 0:52:42.982
<v Speaker 2>can't overpower him, you've created a definition of self defense

0:52:43.542 --> 0:52:46.142
<v Speaker 2>which not only is disputed by a thousand years of

0:52:46.222 --> 0:52:49.062
<v Speaker 2>self defense history martial arts, but it's also going to

0:52:49.062 --> 0:52:53.422
<v Speaker 2>stop you from doing anything. So martial arts do two things.

0:52:54.062 --> 0:52:56.782
<v Speaker 2>The first thing martial arts do is they show you

0:52:57.142 --> 0:53:01.702
<v Speaker 2>how to identify your opponent's weakness. The second thing martial

0:53:01.782 --> 0:53:05.382
<v Speaker 2>arts do, and people spend years and years learning it is.

0:53:05.582 --> 0:53:07.822
<v Speaker 2>They show you how to exploit the weakness. That's it.

0:53:08.222 --> 0:53:11.142
<v Speaker 2>That's the two things martial arts teach. And the longer

0:53:11.182 --> 0:53:13.502
<v Speaker 2>you do it, the more effectively you can do that.

0:53:13.862 --> 0:53:15.502
<v Speaker 2>But you don't have through martial arts to do that.

0:53:16.062 --> 0:53:18.942
<v Speaker 2>So if I grab you, I'm one hundred and five kilos,

0:53:18.982 --> 0:53:22.702
<v Speaker 2>you're not. You can't overpower me. That's my advantage, So

0:53:22.822 --> 0:53:25.662
<v Speaker 2>don't play to my advantage. So if you're my daughter,

0:53:26.222 --> 0:53:29.262
<v Speaker 2>I would say if guy grabbed you, if you want

0:53:29.302 --> 0:53:31.382
<v Speaker 2>to defend yourself, get out of your head this idea

0:53:31.462 --> 0:53:32.982
<v Speaker 2>that that means that you've got to pick me up

0:53:33.022 --> 0:53:35.862
<v Speaker 2>and throw me over your shoulder because you can't so

0:53:36.022 --> 0:53:41.622
<v Speaker 2>identify my weakness or what's my weakness, eyes, nose, throat, groin, feet,

0:53:42.982 --> 0:53:45.982
<v Speaker 2>So don't punch me in the stomach, they won't do

0:53:46.022 --> 0:53:48.422
<v Speaker 2>a thing. Don't hit me ten times on the chest,

0:53:48.982 --> 0:53:50.982
<v Speaker 2>hit me once across the bridge into my nose. My

0:53:51.102 --> 0:53:53.302
<v Speaker 2>nose will shatter. I can't see anything. I'll let you go.

0:53:53.422 --> 0:53:55.782
<v Speaker 2>Bring my hands up to my face, and you perhaps

0:53:55.862 --> 0:53:58.582
<v Speaker 2>now in a better position to employ the number one

0:53:59.342 --> 0:54:04.622
<v Speaker 2>strategy of self defense run one strike, so that doesn't

0:54:04.662 --> 0:54:07.622
<v Speaker 2>require power knee me in the groin, slam your heel

0:54:07.662 --> 0:54:09.902
<v Speaker 2>through the top of my foot to break the meta tassels,

0:54:09.942 --> 0:54:13.382
<v Speaker 2>I gou me, punch me in the throat. Now, these

0:54:13.422 --> 0:54:15.382
<v Speaker 2>are all things that some of your listeners would go, well,

0:54:15.862 --> 0:54:19.422
<v Speaker 2>I couldn't do that. That's what you've got to overcome.

0:54:19.502 --> 0:54:22.142
<v Speaker 2>Why couldn't you do that? Pick up a child who's

0:54:22.262 --> 0:54:26.222
<v Speaker 2>six months old out of a bassinet. That child's afraid

0:54:26.262 --> 0:54:30.982
<v Speaker 2>of you. They'll start screaming yep, and they'll start reaching

0:54:31.022 --> 0:54:32.702
<v Speaker 2>out with their little feet in their little hands. And

0:54:32.782 --> 0:54:34.502
<v Speaker 2>if a little one grabs hold of you and grabs

0:54:34.502 --> 0:54:36.422
<v Speaker 2>hold it, you've got to ply them off. No one's

0:54:36.462 --> 0:54:40.222
<v Speaker 2>taught them that that's a learnt response to being threatened.

0:54:41.302 --> 0:54:43.422
<v Speaker 2>But what we tend to do for fifty percent of

0:54:43.462 --> 0:54:45.702
<v Speaker 2>the population is when they're old enough to listen, we

0:54:45.822 --> 0:54:48.502
<v Speaker 2>tell all, no goodness, me, don't do that. Boys aren't

0:54:48.502 --> 0:54:51.422
<v Speaker 2>told not to fight back. Boys are told if you don't,

0:54:51.422 --> 0:54:54.462
<v Speaker 2>there's something wrong with you. So it's only fifty percent

0:54:54.502 --> 0:54:56.982
<v Speaker 2>of the population has sold this idea that to defend

0:54:57.022 --> 0:54:58.262
<v Speaker 2>yourself you have to overbit you know.

0:54:58.542 --> 0:55:02.342
<v Speaker 1>So it's challenging that it's really interesting when you brought

0:55:02.422 --> 0:55:05.262
<v Speaker 1>up that child. I'm a mother to an eighteen month old,

0:55:05.462 --> 0:55:07.222
<v Speaker 1>and I thought to myself, I don't know if I

0:55:08.582 --> 0:55:11.382
<v Speaker 1>would have the confidence to protect myself by gouging someone's

0:55:11.422 --> 0:55:14.222
<v Speaker 1>eyes out, but if someone went for him, yeah, there

0:55:14.342 --> 0:55:16.422
<v Speaker 1>is no doubt in my mind that I would go

0:55:16.542 --> 0:55:17.102
<v Speaker 1>for their eyes.

0:55:17.422 --> 0:55:20.862
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Imagine someone telling you if you're walking home with

0:55:20.942 --> 0:55:23.222
<v Speaker 2>your little one in a stroll and a car pulls up,

0:55:23.262 --> 0:55:25.142
<v Speaker 2>guy jumps, he's not after yours, after your little one.

0:55:25.902 --> 0:55:29.542
<v Speaker 2>The reaction in the reaction, it's like that's instinct. Well,

0:55:29.582 --> 0:55:33.142
<v Speaker 2>the instinct's always there, it's just now you're thinking not

0:55:33.182 --> 0:55:35.342
<v Speaker 2>about yourself. You're thinking about this little one that you've

0:55:35.382 --> 0:55:36.942
<v Speaker 2>got to protect. You're not going to look at the

0:55:36.982 --> 0:55:39.422
<v Speaker 2>size of the person, you know, and if three people

0:55:39.502 --> 0:55:40.982
<v Speaker 2>jump out of the car, you'll go, well, I'll take

0:55:41.022 --> 0:55:43.142
<v Speaker 2>on three of you. Or would you say, oh, three people,

0:55:43.262 --> 0:55:45.662
<v Speaker 2>or you can have my son? Or would you say

0:55:46.142 --> 0:55:47.782
<v Speaker 2>the guy that got out of the car he was

0:55:47.822 --> 0:55:49.702
<v Speaker 2>a bit bigger than I think, so I let him

0:55:49.742 --> 0:55:51.622
<v Speaker 2>take my son. You couldn't care less how big the

0:55:51.702 --> 0:55:53.342
<v Speaker 2>guy was. He could have a neck the size of

0:55:53.382 --> 0:55:56.422
<v Speaker 2>a rock wheeler. Good luck getting the son from the mother.

0:55:56.742 --> 0:55:59.342
<v Speaker 2>You will flick the switch, the bitch switch. You know

0:55:59.382 --> 0:56:04.102
<v Speaker 2>everyone's got one. It's just tapping into what makes it work.

0:56:04.142 --> 0:56:04.262
<v Speaker 1>You know.

0:56:04.302 --> 0:56:05.782
<v Speaker 2>I think that you might have read in my book

0:56:05.822 --> 0:56:08.022
<v Speaker 2>I had a story about a woman. I said, just

0:56:08.062 --> 0:56:10.222
<v Speaker 2>imagine you had your little one with your hair, and

0:56:10.302 --> 0:56:11.782
<v Speaker 2>you got on the lift to go down to the

0:56:12.542 --> 0:56:14.902
<v Speaker 2>car park underneath the building. Image if you're walking to

0:56:14.942 --> 0:56:16.222
<v Speaker 2>your car and a car pulls up and a guy

0:56:16.302 --> 0:56:18.662
<v Speaker 2>jumps heirs, he's not interested in you, but he's going

0:56:18.742 --> 0:56:20.582
<v Speaker 2>to take your notice. Whatever the child's name was, what

0:56:20.662 --> 0:56:22.662
<v Speaker 2>would you do? She just looked me straight in the eye,

0:56:22.742 --> 0:56:26.382
<v Speaker 2>just cold, so I'd kill him. I said, okay, tell

0:56:26.422 --> 0:56:29.262
<v Speaker 2>me how you do that, and she told me. She

0:56:29.502 --> 0:56:32.062
<v Speaker 2>screamed like she all of a sudden was defending her child.

0:56:32.582 --> 0:56:35.102
<v Speaker 2>And when she finished, I said, see, you can defend yourself.

0:56:36.302 --> 0:56:38.622
<v Speaker 2>It's in there. You just got to be able to

0:56:38.662 --> 0:56:42.622
<v Speaker 2>bring it out. And that doesn't mean that you can

0:56:42.702 --> 0:56:46.262
<v Speaker 2>only defend yourself you're your child. It means it's always

0:56:46.302 --> 0:56:49.022
<v Speaker 2>been there. It's there there within you, it's there within everybody.

0:56:49.742 --> 0:56:51.622
<v Speaker 2>Then your reason we think it's not there is. People

0:56:51.662 --> 0:56:56.062
<v Speaker 2>has told us it's not. Well, choose not to believe them.

0:56:57.342 --> 0:57:00.782
<v Speaker 2>You defend your son, you defend yourself, same thing. It's

0:57:00.822 --> 0:57:02.582
<v Speaker 2>no difference, just mindset.

0:57:07.742 --> 0:57:10.462
<v Speaker 1>Thanks to Brent for sharing his knowledge with us and

0:57:10.622 --> 0:57:14.502
<v Speaker 1>his book and podcast in our show notes. True Crime

0:57:14.542 --> 0:57:17.782
<v Speaker 1>Conversations is a Muma MEA podcast hosted and produced by

0:57:17.862 --> 0:57:21.702
<v Speaker 1>me Jemma Bath with audio design by Scott Stronik. Our

0:57:21.782 --> 0:57:26.022
<v Speaker 1>executive producer is Crystal Kornielsen. Thanks so much for listening.

0:57:26.262 --> 0:57:28.862
<v Speaker 1>I'll be back next week with another True Crime Conversation