WEBVTT - Meghan's Bedtime Routine Is A Lot

0:00:10.622 --> 0:00:13.342
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to a MoMA Mia podcast.

0:00:13.822 --> 0:00:17.182
<v Speaker 2>Mamma Mia acknowledges the traditional owners of land and waters

0:00:17.222 --> 0:00:18.741
<v Speaker 2>that this podcast is recorded on.

0:00:20.021 --> 0:00:24.342
<v Speaker 3>Travis wants to fix it, and he's going, he's like,

0:00:24.422 --> 0:00:27.422
<v Speaker 3>he's grunting because he's going, I really want to help you, Taylor,

0:00:27.502 --> 0:00:28.742
<v Speaker 3>but I don't know what to do. When Taylor's going,

0:00:28.742 --> 0:00:30.342
<v Speaker 3>you don't have to fix it, you just have to

0:00:30.382 --> 0:00:32.622
<v Speaker 3>listen to me, yep, and just be here and hold

0:00:32.622 --> 0:00:34.822
<v Speaker 3>me in this moment. But Travis is like, no, no,

0:00:34.942 --> 0:00:36.861
<v Speaker 3>I know what I'm gonna do. And he gets out

0:00:36.902 --> 0:00:37.582
<v Speaker 3>his phone.

0:00:37.342 --> 0:00:40.221
<v Speaker 1>And she goes to no, Travis, don't Travis.

0:00:39.862 --> 0:00:41.461
<v Speaker 4>And then he goes to his follow account. He goes,

0:00:41.462 --> 0:00:42.302
<v Speaker 4>I'm gonna follow him.

0:00:42.502 --> 0:00:43.862
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to do it. I'm going to do it.

0:00:43.982 --> 0:00:46.582
<v Speaker 4>Do it and watch me, watch me tailor Travis, and

0:00:46.662 --> 0:00:47.622
<v Speaker 4>he went unfollowed.

0:00:47.622 --> 0:00:48.662
<v Speaker 1>You're more of a TikTok guy.

0:00:48.822 --> 0:00:49.302
<v Speaker 4>Fixed it.

0:00:52.222 --> 0:00:55.262
<v Speaker 2>Hello, and welcome to Mommama Out Loud. What women are

0:00:55.262 --> 0:00:58.422
<v Speaker 2>actually talking about On Wednesday, the thirtieth of April, I

0:00:58.462 --> 0:01:00.182
<v Speaker 2>am hollyween Wright, I am Maya.

0:01:00.022 --> 0:01:02.702
<v Speaker 4>Friedman, and I'm Jesse Stevens.

0:01:02.102 --> 0:01:06.742
<v Speaker 2>An on Today's show when saying no costs you. Michelle

0:01:06.782 --> 0:01:09.422
<v Speaker 2>Obama has talked about what it took to not to

0:01:09.661 --> 0:01:13.422
<v Speaker 2>not President Trump's inauguration and why it's important to disappoint

0:01:13.502 --> 0:01:18.062
<v Speaker 2>people every day. Can some children read Minds? A hit

0:01:18.102 --> 0:01:21.902
<v Speaker 2>podcast said yes, the truth might be more complicated. And

0:01:22.422 --> 0:01:26.182
<v Speaker 2>Gwyneth Paltrow is eating carbs and it's making international headlines.

0:01:26.422 --> 0:01:30.301
<v Speaker 2>Should famous women just shut up about food? But first,

0:01:30.462 --> 0:01:31.902
<v Speaker 2>Jesse Stevens, We've.

0:01:31.702 --> 0:01:35.902
<v Speaker 3>Got some feedback for Clive Palmer, who is sending me, specifically,

0:01:35.902 --> 0:01:37.582
<v Speaker 3>a series of really annoying text messages.

0:01:37.702 --> 0:01:38.622
<v Speaker 4>Anyone else getting them.

0:01:38.702 --> 0:01:41.702
<v Speaker 2>I'm feeling a little negged because last election he was

0:01:41.782 --> 0:01:45.062
<v Speaker 2>sending me a lot of texts. This election, I haven't

0:01:45.102 --> 0:01:46.382
<v Speaker 2>heard from him. I'm feeling ghosted.

0:01:46.542 --> 0:01:49.502
<v Speaker 1>Okay, I haven't either. But just when we were setting

0:01:49.582 --> 0:01:53.182
<v Speaker 1>up to record today, our producer mt a text.

0:01:52.982 --> 0:01:54.662
<v Speaker 3>From so I was going to say, I kid you not.

0:01:54.942 --> 0:01:57.462
<v Speaker 3>I was putting together this and I got a text message.

0:01:57.462 --> 0:01:58.582
<v Speaker 3>I checked Trumpet.

0:01:58.822 --> 0:02:00.102
<v Speaker 1>How many Trumpets have you had?

0:02:00.102 --> 0:02:00.582
<v Speaker 4>I've had four?

0:02:00.622 --> 0:02:03.142
<v Speaker 2>And what's he saying to you? Trump? Hey, Jesse, how's

0:02:03.142 --> 0:02:03.462
<v Speaker 2>your day?

0:02:03.742 --> 0:02:05.822
<v Speaker 3>That's exactly what he's saying. He knows not to call me.

0:02:06.262 --> 0:02:08.781
<v Speaker 3>I think the Trumpet has learned that we don't call

0:02:08.781 --> 0:02:09.262
<v Speaker 3>because and I was.

0:02:09.222 --> 0:02:10.702
<v Speaker 1>Picking a Trumpet's calling.

0:02:16.422 --> 0:02:19.062
<v Speaker 3>Well, no, they used to call you like they used

0:02:19.102 --> 0:02:20.742
<v Speaker 3>to do calls anyway, the.

0:02:20.822 --> 0:02:23.422
<v Speaker 1>Trumpet Patriots is the name of his political party, just

0:02:23.422 --> 0:02:24.542
<v Speaker 1>in case anyone's wondering.

0:02:24.622 --> 0:02:27.102
<v Speaker 3>And if you're wondering what his message is, well, the

0:02:27.142 --> 0:02:30.302
<v Speaker 3>first message I got said solve housing, fast trains twenty

0:02:30.302 --> 0:02:32.982
<v Speaker 3>minutes CBD, cheap land with no punctuation.

0:02:33.302 --> 0:02:35.942
<v Speaker 1>And that's just a list of nouns that sounds like

0:02:35.982 --> 0:02:37.342
<v Speaker 1>a house sale.

0:02:37.462 --> 0:02:38.102
<v Speaker 2>Where do I go?

0:02:38.222 --> 0:02:39.862
<v Speaker 1>Why do I have to turn up with cash?

0:02:39.982 --> 0:02:41.342
<v Speaker 4>I was sitting there at a wedding, and I go,

0:02:41.502 --> 0:02:44.302
<v Speaker 4>is he solving housing with the fast trains? Is he

0:02:44.382 --> 0:02:45.782
<v Speaker 4>buying more land in the CBD?

0:02:45.982 --> 0:02:48.142
<v Speaker 1>Like we didn't get to your housing faster on a train?

0:02:48.742 --> 0:02:50.022
<v Speaker 4>Like what are we talking about?

0:02:50.662 --> 0:02:51.382
<v Speaker 2>But did you know?

0:02:51.622 --> 0:02:54.862
<v Speaker 3>I learned this week that these messages are totally above board,

0:02:54.942 --> 0:03:00.302
<v Speaker 3>totally legal, because politicians have a legal exemption from spam.

0:03:00.502 --> 0:03:04.662
<v Speaker 3>That's why they're allowed to send unsolicited texts. They're allowed

0:03:04.702 --> 0:03:08.022
<v Speaker 3>to call you without offering an opt out option. They

0:03:08.062 --> 0:03:11.942
<v Speaker 3>are also exempt from privacy laws, so they can collect, store,

0:03:11.982 --> 0:03:14.982
<v Speaker 3>and use your personal data without the same restrictions that

0:03:15.022 --> 0:03:19.061
<v Speaker 3>apply to any businesses. So Trumpet can literally call me

0:03:19.102 --> 0:03:21.542
<v Speaker 3>a hundred times creepy text me and I have to

0:03:21.542 --> 0:03:26.022
<v Speaker 3>copy it, and no laws requiring that these texts be truthful.

0:03:26.582 --> 0:03:29.381
<v Speaker 3>They could text me anything at all. They could say

0:03:29.422 --> 0:03:32.341
<v Speaker 3>the sky is red, the ground is yellow, and your

0:03:32.422 --> 0:03:33.262
<v Speaker 3>name is Clive.

0:03:33.662 --> 0:03:37.582
<v Speaker 2>I know why they're texting because apparently only thirty percent

0:03:37.622 --> 0:03:40.782
<v Speaker 2>of emails ever get opened, but ninety percent of text

0:03:40.822 --> 0:03:43.982
<v Speaker 2>messages do. And that's interesting, right. I don't open all

0:03:43.982 --> 0:03:46.222
<v Speaker 2>my text messages. I'm one of those people who drives

0:03:46.222 --> 0:03:49.302
<v Speaker 2>everyone crazy by having the red sign that says twenty

0:03:49.342 --> 0:03:51.502
<v Speaker 2>million texts because I just look at it and go,

0:03:51.542 --> 0:03:53.062
<v Speaker 2>I don't need to know about that, and I move

0:03:53.102 --> 0:03:56.782
<v Speaker 2>on with my life. But apparently most people are much

0:03:57.422 --> 0:04:00.022
<v Speaker 2>more organized than I am, and they open everything before

0:04:00.062 --> 0:04:00.542
<v Speaker 2>they read it.

0:04:00.622 --> 0:04:02.502
<v Speaker 3>So I reckon that texts are going to go that

0:04:02.582 --> 0:04:05.662
<v Speaker 3>way because we've learned with emails about the spam. I

0:04:05.742 --> 0:04:08.302
<v Speaker 3>no longer answer my phone because I've just been done

0:04:08.382 --> 0:04:12.662
<v Speaker 3>so many times by GET. I do not answer my

0:04:12.662 --> 0:04:14.502
<v Speaker 3>phone as a general rule, and I'm getting that way

0:04:14.542 --> 0:04:15.862
<v Speaker 3>with texts because of things like this.

0:04:17.222 --> 0:04:19.142
<v Speaker 1>A couple of months ago, you might remember that there

0:04:19.222 --> 0:04:21.782
<v Speaker 1>was gossip around whether the Obamas were getting divorced.

0:04:22.382 --> 0:04:25.502
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and Obama was dating Jennifer Aniston, right.

0:04:25.541 --> 0:04:29.421
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, there were two specific reasons for these rumors.

0:04:29.662 --> 0:04:33.782
<v Speaker 3>Of those rumors because I feel like Mayor Friedman absolutely.

0:04:33.222 --> 0:04:36.502
<v Speaker 1>For Jennifer Aniston ones, but the rumors, I don't want

0:04:36.501 --> 0:04:39.061
<v Speaker 1>them to split up. I want starting that rumor. The

0:04:39.181 --> 0:04:42.301
<v Speaker 1>reasons that people were talking about it is because firstly,

0:04:42.421 --> 0:04:45.302
<v Speaker 1>Michelle didn't attend Jimmy Carter's funeral, and then a few

0:04:45.301 --> 0:04:49.821
<v Speaker 1>weeks later she didn't attend Donald Trump's inauguration. So what

0:04:49.941 --> 0:04:52.222
<v Speaker 1>other explanation could there be for her not showing up

0:04:52.301 --> 0:04:56.621
<v Speaker 1>as a former First Lady at these very official ceremonial events.

0:04:57.181 --> 0:05:00.821
<v Speaker 1>All the other former first ladies did except for Michelle.

0:05:01.022 --> 0:05:04.101
<v Speaker 1>So was it splits field? That's what everybody was saying. Well,

0:05:04.101 --> 0:05:07.142
<v Speaker 1>now we know that Michelle Obama's marriage wasn't in trouble,

0:05:07.301 --> 0:05:08.782
<v Speaker 1>or it might have been in trouble, might still be

0:05:08.861 --> 0:05:11.342
<v Speaker 1>in trouble, but that's not why she didn't turn up.

0:05:11.501 --> 0:05:13.981
<v Speaker 1>She just didn't want to go. Here's what she said

0:05:13.981 --> 0:05:15.621
<v Speaker 1>in a podcast interview this week.

0:05:15.941 --> 0:05:19.662
<v Speaker 5>My decision to skip the inauguration. You know what people

0:05:19.702 --> 0:05:23.382
<v Speaker 5>don't realize or my decision to make choices at the

0:05:23.462 --> 0:05:26.981
<v Speaker 5>beginning of this year that suited me were met with

0:05:27.381 --> 0:05:31.382
<v Speaker 5>such ridicule and criticism, like people couldn't believe that I

0:05:31.462 --> 0:05:33.621
<v Speaker 5>was saying no for any other reason that they had

0:05:33.621 --> 0:05:35.821
<v Speaker 5>to assume that my marriage was falling.

0:05:36.061 --> 0:05:36.261
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:05:36.501 --> 0:05:40.981
<v Speaker 5>You know, It's like, while I'm here really trying to

0:05:41.061 --> 0:05:45.902
<v Speaker 5>own my life and intentionally practice making the choice that

0:05:46.022 --> 0:05:48.101
<v Speaker 5>was right for me, and it took everything in my

0:05:48.222 --> 0:05:51.702
<v Speaker 5>power to not do the thing that was right or

0:05:51.702 --> 0:05:54.822
<v Speaker 5>that was perceived as right, but do the thing that

0:05:54.941 --> 0:05:58.782
<v Speaker 5>was right for me. That was a hard thing for

0:05:58.902 --> 0:06:02.101
<v Speaker 5>me to do. I had to basically trick myself out

0:06:02.101 --> 0:06:05.101
<v Speaker 5>of it. And it started with not having anything to wear.

0:06:05.301 --> 0:06:08.261
<v Speaker 5>I mean, I had affirmatively because I'm always prepared for

0:06:08.381 --> 0:06:12.101
<v Speaker 5>in a funeral any I walk around with the right dress.

0:06:12.262 --> 0:06:15.382
<v Speaker 5>I travel with clothes just in case something pops off.

0:06:16.222 --> 0:06:18.462
<v Speaker 5>So I was like, if I'm not going to do

0:06:18.501 --> 0:06:21.142
<v Speaker 5>this thing, I gotta tell my team I don't even

0:06:21.222 --> 0:06:23.901
<v Speaker 5>want to have a dress ready. It's so easy to

0:06:24.181 --> 0:06:26.861
<v Speaker 5>just say, let me do the right thing, but then

0:06:26.902 --> 0:06:29.941
<v Speaker 5>you become a shark absorber. Yeah, and that's what women

0:06:30.022 --> 0:06:31.621
<v Speaker 5>are as shark absorbers.

0:06:31.821 --> 0:06:36.462
<v Speaker 1>The idea of being a shock absorber really hit now.

0:06:36.501 --> 0:06:39.661
<v Speaker 1>For more than eight years, Michelle Obama had to be

0:06:39.821 --> 0:06:43.622
<v Speaker 1>a shock absorber because as the first black first Lady,

0:06:44.262 --> 0:06:46.462
<v Speaker 1>she didn't want to hand any ammunition to people who

0:06:46.541 --> 0:06:48.981
<v Speaker 1>believe black people didn't belong in the White House. And

0:06:49.022 --> 0:06:51.701
<v Speaker 1>she sacrificed so much, not just for the eight years

0:06:51.782 --> 0:06:55.022
<v Speaker 1>when Obama was president, but in the sort of four

0:06:55.101 --> 0:06:58.501
<v Speaker 1>years or more before that when he was running. She

0:06:58.821 --> 0:07:03.101
<v Speaker 1>held her tongue, she silenced her opinions, she straightened her hair,

0:07:03.222 --> 0:07:06.822
<v Speaker 1>she squished her personal style, she didn't show her arms.

0:07:07.101 --> 0:07:09.222
<v Speaker 1>She did all the right things, all the things that

0:07:09.262 --> 0:07:10.342
<v Speaker 1>were expected of her.

0:07:10.742 --> 0:07:13.982
<v Speaker 3>Can you explain what a shock absorber is? How would

0:07:13.982 --> 0:07:16.502
<v Speaker 3>you describe it when she says you were.

0:07:16.381 --> 0:07:19.461
<v Speaker 2>A shock So a shock absorber in the you know,

0:07:19.582 --> 0:07:22.662
<v Speaker 2>technical description of something is something that stands in between

0:07:22.742 --> 0:07:24.701
<v Speaker 2>two hard forces, so you know, like a piece of

0:07:24.742 --> 0:07:26.941
<v Speaker 2>rubber or something that stops them from banging together in

0:07:26.982 --> 0:07:30.821
<v Speaker 2>an angry aggressive way. So it's the thing that absorbs

0:07:30.902 --> 0:07:34.622
<v Speaker 2>all the pressure. So the shock absorber is getting hammered

0:07:35.222 --> 0:07:38.542
<v Speaker 2>to stop the other two things basically igniting.

0:07:38.742 --> 0:07:40.901
<v Speaker 1>Do you know what I sometimes say? There must be

0:07:40.941 --> 0:07:43.222
<v Speaker 1>a time of life where you just get like I'm

0:07:43.302 --> 0:07:46.222
<v Speaker 1>jack of this. I started saying a few years ago

0:07:46.502 --> 0:07:49.662
<v Speaker 1>to my husband, I just feel like human grout. I

0:07:49.662 --> 0:07:50.502
<v Speaker 1>feel like grout.

0:07:50.862 --> 0:07:51.462
<v Speaker 2>I feel like.

0:07:51.502 --> 0:07:54.342
<v Speaker 1>Everyone else is the tile, the people I work with,

0:07:54.381 --> 0:07:57.902
<v Speaker 1>my children, my parents, my husband, and I'm just the grout.

0:07:57.982 --> 0:08:00.782
<v Speaker 1>I just fit in. I'm just there so that the

0:08:00.862 --> 0:08:04.502
<v Speaker 1>tiles don't bang together, so that everybody's life is stable

0:08:04.862 --> 0:08:08.102
<v Speaker 1>and calm. And what about me? When can I be

0:08:08.182 --> 0:08:08.622
<v Speaker 1>a tile?

0:08:08.782 --> 0:08:11.102
<v Speaker 3>So there was a an article in the New York Times,

0:08:12.182 --> 0:08:14.182
<v Speaker 3>when do I get to be a tired exactly?

0:08:14.262 --> 0:08:16.141
<v Speaker 1>And now Michelle's in her tile era.

0:08:16.142 --> 0:08:17.782
<v Speaker 4>She's a tile on her own.

0:08:17.862 --> 0:08:19.781
<v Speaker 3>But there was an article in the New York Times

0:08:19.862 --> 0:08:23.382
<v Speaker 3>during the pandemic about how women were the shock absorbers

0:08:23.422 --> 0:08:26.222
<v Speaker 3>because they were the ones that quit their jobs when

0:08:26.222 --> 0:08:30.182
<v Speaker 3>they needed to be quick like. So in a family context,

0:08:30.302 --> 0:08:32.901
<v Speaker 3>it's often said that, I mean, even with little children,

0:08:33.142 --> 0:08:36.381
<v Speaker 3>when a problem is seen, it's like, okay, me sacrificing

0:08:36.982 --> 0:08:40.862
<v Speaker 3>will cause the least conflict in this situation, which women

0:08:40.902 --> 0:08:45.742
<v Speaker 3>are programmed to do because there's something socialized into us

0:08:45.822 --> 0:08:48.222
<v Speaker 3>which is to keep the peace and to sacrifice.

0:08:48.502 --> 0:08:49.502
<v Speaker 1>Yes, it's lubricant.

0:08:49.862 --> 0:08:53.942
<v Speaker 2>And also I think often when a man is behaving

0:08:53.982 --> 0:08:57.182
<v Speaker 2>really badly. Think about sort of the political wives who

0:08:57.182 --> 0:08:59.142
<v Speaker 2>have to stand next to their spouse is when they've

0:08:59.182 --> 0:09:01.862
<v Speaker 2>done something unforgivable and do the smiling and the nodding

0:09:01.862 --> 0:09:05.782
<v Speaker 2>and we're all so happy. Like that's classic shock absorbent behavior, right.

0:09:06.022 --> 0:09:08.662
<v Speaker 2>The thing I loved about all the detail in what

0:09:08.702 --> 0:09:12.502
<v Speaker 2>Michelle Obama gave us is that you know, at the time,

0:09:12.742 --> 0:09:14.862
<v Speaker 2>when she didn't go, we all thought that the marriage

0:09:14.902 --> 0:09:17.142
<v Speaker 2>room as were bullshit. Really, we all knew that she

0:09:17.262 --> 0:09:20.542
<v Speaker 2>was really just going, I just can't like let them, Yeah,

0:09:20.662 --> 0:09:23.582
<v Speaker 2>that's it. But what I loved about that is her

0:09:23.622 --> 0:09:26.782
<v Speaker 2>describing how difficult it was. It wasn't just her sitting

0:09:26.822 --> 0:09:28.622
<v Speaker 2>at home putting a feet up and going, see, yah,

0:09:28.742 --> 0:09:31.622
<v Speaker 2>I hope you suit still fits. To Barack as he

0:09:31.622 --> 0:09:34.742
<v Speaker 2>walked out of the house, it was a whole, very

0:09:34.782 --> 0:09:37.942
<v Speaker 2>difficult thing because even for him, if you're saying no,

0:09:38.182 --> 0:09:39.982
<v Speaker 2>and you know you're going to disappoint people, I'm not

0:09:40.022 --> 0:09:42.022
<v Speaker 2>going to that thing, even though everyone thinks I should go.

0:09:42.742 --> 0:09:45.182
<v Speaker 2>There's a cost to other people. So Barack Obama also

0:09:45.262 --> 0:09:48.022
<v Speaker 2>had to weather all the commentary about his marriage. He

0:09:48.062 --> 0:09:49.422
<v Speaker 2>had to go and stand there on his own. We

0:09:49.462 --> 0:09:51.942
<v Speaker 2>all remember the video of him ready to walk out

0:09:51.942 --> 0:09:53.502
<v Speaker 2>of the inauguration and they're saying, are you going to

0:09:53.542 --> 0:09:55.822
<v Speaker 2>behave and he's like no, but like he did not

0:09:55.902 --> 0:09:59.462
<v Speaker 2>have Michelle have his shock absorble with him, right, so

0:10:00.462 --> 0:10:03.062
<v Speaker 2>you know that your decision to do what's right for you,

0:10:03.382 --> 0:10:06.542
<v Speaker 2>Michelle sounds like nearly every midlife woman I know who's

0:10:06.542 --> 0:10:09.742
<v Speaker 2>in therapy who's like just going, I'm finally learning how

0:10:09.782 --> 0:10:11.902
<v Speaker 2>not to be the grout or the shock absilber. Yeah,

0:10:11.902 --> 0:10:13.942
<v Speaker 2>and I'm doing it for me and it's hard. And

0:10:14.062 --> 0:10:17.062
<v Speaker 2>Barack was probably going it would just shut everyone up

0:10:17.062 --> 0:10:19.822
<v Speaker 2>if you turn up, and she was like, no, I can't,

0:10:20.142 --> 0:10:23.381
<v Speaker 2>but it costs something, and nose sometimes do cost things,

0:10:23.422 --> 0:10:23.622
<v Speaker 2>you know.

0:10:23.782 --> 0:10:23.982
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:10:24.022 --> 0:10:26.942
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, And I was reading something recently. I can't remember

0:10:26.982 --> 0:10:29.062
<v Speaker 3>who the author was, but it was about how when

0:10:29.662 --> 0:10:35.382
<v Speaker 3>you achieve any level of success, whether it's a promotionate work,

0:10:35.702 --> 0:10:38.942
<v Speaker 3>or you know, you're Michelle Obama, the one inevitability that

0:10:38.942 --> 0:10:40.702
<v Speaker 3>comes with that is that you're going to let people down.

0:10:40.702 --> 0:10:41.942
<v Speaker 4>You're going to disappoint people.

0:10:42.382 --> 0:10:46.182
<v Speaker 3>This writer was saying you should practice it like every day,

0:10:46.622 --> 0:10:48.942
<v Speaker 3>go I am going to disappoint one person and choose

0:10:48.982 --> 0:10:49.662
<v Speaker 3>who the person is.

0:10:50.502 --> 0:10:51.942
<v Speaker 2>So hard tell me more about that.

0:10:52.022 --> 0:10:53.742
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, So she says, you've got to choose who the

0:10:53.742 --> 0:10:57.382
<v Speaker 3>person is, because trying not to disappoint people is a

0:10:57.462 --> 0:11:00.062
<v Speaker 3>prison that you can live in your entire life. If

0:11:00.142 --> 0:11:02.462
<v Speaker 3>you're trying not to disappoint them, you're likely going to

0:11:02.502 --> 0:11:05.662
<v Speaker 3>disappoint yourself or the people closest to you. So it's

0:11:05.942 --> 0:11:09.502
<v Speaker 3>actually a skill. And there are like rules or things

0:11:09.662 --> 0:11:12.622
<v Speaker 3>that you should abide by when it comes to disappointing people.

0:11:12.742 --> 0:11:18.142
<v Speaker 3>So you should express yourself kindly, compassionately, but most importantly firmly,

0:11:18.302 --> 0:11:20.542
<v Speaker 3>Like you've got to be really clear when you're letting

0:11:20.542 --> 0:11:24.502
<v Speaker 3>someone down and you have to follow through. I think

0:11:24.582 --> 0:11:26.782
<v Speaker 3>that the firmly is where I fall flat. I will

0:11:26.822 --> 0:11:31.222
<v Speaker 3>often go to disappoint someone and I will have Luca

0:11:31.502 --> 0:11:33.342
<v Speaker 3>or Maya or someone look at the message and go,

0:11:33.542 --> 0:11:34.662
<v Speaker 3>I don't know what you're saying.

0:11:37.342 --> 0:11:39.381
<v Speaker 2>Yes, I don't think I can do that thing. I'll

0:11:39.422 --> 0:11:41.622
<v Speaker 2>do my best absolutely maybe whatever.

0:11:42.222 --> 0:11:44.862
<v Speaker 4>You're doing it or not, and the people question marks.

0:11:45.422 --> 0:11:49.102
<v Speaker 3>The clinical psychologist doctor Nicole Lapera talks about this, and

0:11:49.182 --> 0:11:53.462
<v Speaker 3>she says that when you try to avoid disappointing someone,

0:11:54.342 --> 0:11:58.302
<v Speaker 3>you're making them small. You're operating under the belief that

0:11:58.342 --> 0:12:01.662
<v Speaker 3>they'll be crushed if you can't make something, and that's

0:12:01.702 --> 0:12:03.702
<v Speaker 3>just not true. You've got to expect more of others.

0:12:03.702 --> 0:12:08.222
<v Speaker 3>Like it's actually like you're being quite paternalistic or undermining

0:12:08.222 --> 0:12:11.382
<v Speaker 3>someone by thinking that Maya can't handle it if I say, hey,

0:12:11.422 --> 0:12:14.182
<v Speaker 3>by the way, I can't go tomorrow night.

0:12:14.422 --> 0:12:14.782
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:12:14.822 --> 0:12:17.382
<v Speaker 1>I think where I find it most difficult is with

0:12:17.462 --> 0:12:19.502
<v Speaker 1>my children and with my parents.

0:12:19.822 --> 0:12:21.502
<v Speaker 4>And don't you think that is parenting.

0:12:21.662 --> 0:12:25.222
<v Speaker 1>I don't mean disappointing like a good I never understand.

0:12:24.902 --> 0:12:28.662
<v Speaker 4>A good parent just disappoints then all the time they do.

0:12:28.822 --> 0:12:31.222
<v Speaker 2>But also the model of good parent we've been given

0:12:31.302 --> 0:12:36.462
<v Speaker 2>is constant shock absorption, constant putting yourself blast, constant swallowing

0:12:36.502 --> 0:12:38.822
<v Speaker 2>your feelings so your kids don't see them, not having

0:12:38.822 --> 0:12:40.782
<v Speaker 2>that argument with your partner so your kid doesn't see it,

0:12:40.782 --> 0:12:42.542
<v Speaker 2>putting up with somebody talking to it in a certain way,

0:12:42.742 --> 0:12:45.422
<v Speaker 2>blah blah blah. Like that is a lot of parenting,

0:12:45.462 --> 0:12:47.142
<v Speaker 2>and there's and a lot of it is necessary and

0:12:47.182 --> 0:12:48.782
<v Speaker 2>you kind of have to do it. And this is

0:12:48.862 --> 0:12:52.902
<v Speaker 2>why often I think that this era of Arah comes

0:12:52.942 --> 0:12:55.542
<v Speaker 2>a little later when the steaks aren't quite so high

0:12:55.582 --> 0:12:59.342
<v Speaker 2>for your family, because what's interesting about Michelle Obama specifically.

0:12:59.422 --> 0:13:00.782
<v Speaker 2>It's obvious why she didn't want to go to the

0:13:00.822 --> 0:13:03.542
<v Speaker 2>Trump inauguration, but she also didn't want to go to

0:13:03.542 --> 0:13:05.542
<v Speaker 2>the Jimmy carterfuneral because she knew she'd have to sit

0:13:05.742 --> 0:13:09.222
<v Speaker 2>next to him and make nice. And she obviously has

0:13:09.262 --> 0:13:13.142
<v Speaker 2>just that in her integrity, as she would say, she

0:13:13.262 --> 0:13:16.662
<v Speaker 2>cannot do that anymore. It's costing her too much to

0:13:16.742 --> 0:13:18.982
<v Speaker 2>someone who she really believes is ripping at the fabric

0:13:19.062 --> 0:13:22.382
<v Speaker 2>of all that she stands for. She can do that now.

0:13:22.542 --> 0:13:24.662
<v Speaker 2>She couldn't do that when she was First Lady, you

0:13:24.742 --> 0:13:25.262
<v Speaker 2>know what I mean.

0:13:25.462 --> 0:13:28.382
<v Speaker 1>No, she couldn't. And I think the other level of

0:13:28.422 --> 0:13:33.542
<v Speaker 1>it for her is seeing how Milania Trump behaved that

0:13:33.782 --> 0:13:36.542
<v Speaker 1>and Donald Trump. But as she you know, if you

0:13:36.582 --> 0:13:39.742
<v Speaker 1>read her book Becoming, she talks about having to do

0:13:39.862 --> 0:13:44.102
<v Speaker 1>everything so scrupulously and everybody looking to find fault. When

0:13:44.262 --> 0:13:47.302
<v Speaker 1>Michelle Obama was First Lady and then Milania comes in,

0:13:47.782 --> 0:13:50.302
<v Speaker 1>she wears a jacket saying, I don't care. She doesn't

0:13:50.382 --> 0:13:52.942
<v Speaker 1>live at the White House half the time. She doesn't

0:13:53.022 --> 0:13:55.141
<v Speaker 1>really do anything as First Lady.

0:13:55.542 --> 0:13:56.782
<v Speaker 2>As Christmas Trees of all Time.

0:13:56.902 --> 0:13:59.422
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and she just I mean phoning it in is

0:13:59.582 --> 0:14:01.942
<v Speaker 1>an exaggeration of what she does. She doesn't even phone

0:14:01.982 --> 0:14:05.662
<v Speaker 1>it in, and so she just flouts every single convention

0:14:05.742 --> 0:14:07.982
<v Speaker 1>and every single norm. And then you can see Michelle

0:14:07.982 --> 0:14:10.662
<v Speaker 1>Obama going, why am I always the good girl? Like

0:14:11.382 --> 0:14:14.662
<v Speaker 1>he's not running for elected office anymore. I am not

0:14:14.862 --> 0:14:16.822
<v Speaker 1>that role model. And there was all that pressure on

0:14:16.862 --> 0:14:19.822
<v Speaker 1>her to actually run for being the president. Can you imagine,

0:14:19.822 --> 0:14:21.702
<v Speaker 1>like with her and Oprah, you're the only ones that

0:14:21.782 --> 0:14:25.542
<v Speaker 1>can save us from Donald Trump, and everybody wanted her

0:14:25.542 --> 0:14:28.382
<v Speaker 1>to do it, and she said no, and the cost

0:14:28.422 --> 0:14:33.302
<v Speaker 1>of disappointing all of those people. You've got to admire that.

0:14:33.422 --> 0:14:39.062
<v Speaker 3>But what you gain from choosing disappointing others is self respect.

0:14:39.342 --> 0:14:41.102
<v Speaker 3>I think self respect is on the other side of that,

0:14:41.502 --> 0:14:44.342
<v Speaker 3>and I think that you can probably live a lot

0:14:44.382 --> 0:14:47.102
<v Speaker 3>of years being the shock absorber not wanting to disappoint,

0:14:47.142 --> 0:14:48.582
<v Speaker 3>and it erodes.

0:14:48.102 --> 0:14:48.942
<v Speaker 4>Your self respect.

0:14:49.142 --> 0:14:53.862
<v Speaker 1>It also is immunity against resentment, because you know what,

0:14:54.022 --> 0:14:57.782
<v Speaker 1>grout and shock absorbers feel resentful and it might come

0:14:57.822 --> 0:15:01.502
<v Speaker 1>after a decade, two decades, whatever, and then suddenly the

0:15:01.502 --> 0:15:04.862
<v Speaker 1>grout saying to the title, Hey, I'm fucking grout, I'm

0:15:04.902 --> 0:15:06.662
<v Speaker 1>over this, and you might end your marriage or you

0:15:06.702 --> 0:15:10.782
<v Speaker 1>might you know, do something drastic, but the title never

0:15:10.902 --> 0:15:14.102
<v Speaker 1>knew because you've just gone it's okay, it's okay, I'll

0:15:14.502 --> 0:15:17.742
<v Speaker 1>I'll just be here and absorb everything. And then it's like, hmm,

0:15:17.902 --> 0:15:21.862
<v Speaker 1>so maybe we need to you know, say no and

0:15:21.902 --> 0:15:23.742
<v Speaker 1>disappoint people a little bit earlier.

0:15:24.062 --> 0:15:26.702
<v Speaker 4>Constantly must be done, constantly. You do it well, man,

0:15:26.782 --> 0:15:27.742
<v Speaker 4>I'm so good at it.

0:15:28.382 --> 0:15:31.782
<v Speaker 3>In a moment, the celebrity unfollowed that has everyone talking

0:15:31.902 --> 0:15:36.062
<v Speaker 3>and unpacking the telepathy tapes, a viral podcast that dethrone

0:15:36.142 --> 0:15:40.142
<v Speaker 3>Joe Rogan, and then came the backlash.

0:15:42.342 --> 0:15:45.702
<v Speaker 2>I am living my very happiest life today because I'm

0:15:45.702 --> 0:15:49.262
<v Speaker 2>bringing all the schoreless gossip, all the celebrity news. So

0:15:49.502 --> 0:15:52.742
<v Speaker 2>permit me a smug huh at the news that one

0:15:52.862 --> 0:15:56.462
<v Speaker 2>Travis Kelcey of Big Footballer who dates Taylor Swift fame,

0:15:56.862 --> 0:16:00.862
<v Speaker 2>has unfollowed, the husband of one of Taylor's absolute best mates,

0:16:00.902 --> 0:16:04.942
<v Speaker 2>Blake Lively. Yes, Travis is no longer Instagram buddies with

0:16:05.102 --> 0:16:09.262
<v Speaker 2>Ryan Reynolds, and the speculation is rife. Is this about

0:16:09.342 --> 0:16:12.822
<v Speaker 2>that court case build for next year between Justin Baldoni

0:16:12.902 --> 0:16:15.182
<v Speaker 2>and Blake Lively and not wanting to be pulled into

0:16:15.342 --> 0:16:18.822
<v Speaker 2>all the unabating drama of it. Or is Travis just

0:16:18.822 --> 0:16:21.382
<v Speaker 2>sick of all the Rex and Football club reels? Or

0:16:21.862 --> 0:16:25.302
<v Speaker 2>did his finger just slip and he accidentally pressed unfollow

0:16:25.702 --> 0:16:29.022
<v Speaker 2>next to a smiling picture of Deadpool Jesse. What is

0:16:29.062 --> 0:16:30.702
<v Speaker 2>the significant subtext here?

0:16:31.062 --> 0:16:33.622
<v Speaker 4>As if she'd no, no, I have so many thoughts

0:16:33.622 --> 0:16:33.942
<v Speaker 4>about this.

0:16:33.982 --> 0:16:36.742
<v Speaker 2>I've been thinking, don't worry about I'm coming to you

0:16:36.822 --> 0:16:42.822
<v Speaker 2>for the full Taylor run. The tailor's to take turns

0:16:42.862 --> 0:16:44.502
<v Speaker 2>here she knows about unfollowing?

0:16:44.622 --> 0:16:47.342
<v Speaker 1>Before you talk? Can I just have a shout out

0:16:47.382 --> 0:16:51.542
<v Speaker 1>to whatever piece of software it is that gossip columnists

0:16:52.342 --> 0:16:57.262
<v Speaker 1>have installed that shows them someone's two million followers goes

0:16:57.302 --> 0:16:58.182
<v Speaker 1>to like one million.

0:16:59.622 --> 0:17:04.102
<v Speaker 4>That's not what happened. I went to fans noticed.

0:17:04.382 --> 0:17:07.742
<v Speaker 1>The fans literally going how many followers does Ryan Reynolds have?

0:17:07.821 --> 0:17:10.382
<v Speaker 3>To that that's what fan discovered something else. I don't

0:17:10.422 --> 0:17:12.262
<v Speaker 3>know if I'd call myself a fan of Travis Kelsey,

0:17:12.302 --> 0:17:14.141
<v Speaker 3>but I went on too his Instagram and I was like,

0:17:14.182 --> 0:17:16.622
<v Speaker 3>everyone's talking about the Ryan Reynold's unfollow Does a man

0:17:16.661 --> 0:17:18.581
<v Speaker 3>follow Blake? And I went and had a look, No,

0:17:18.702 --> 0:17:20.742
<v Speaker 3>he doesn't, he doesn't follow Blake. And then I went

0:17:20.742 --> 0:17:24.262
<v Speaker 3>and had a look, and Blake Lively follows Taylor, but

0:17:24.341 --> 0:17:27.422
<v Speaker 3>she does not follow Travis, which is weird given that

0:17:27.782 --> 0:17:30.581
<v Speaker 3>Blake and Ryan were at the super Bowl last year

0:17:30.621 --> 0:17:33.542
<v Speaker 3>supporting them. So there has been a holiday together not

0:17:33.581 --> 0:17:35.742
<v Speaker 3>that long. Yeah, I'll tell you exactly what's happened.

0:17:35.782 --> 0:17:38.341
<v Speaker 2>This is Travis's content is a bit boring.

0:17:38.702 --> 0:17:39.381
<v Speaker 4>It's a worrying.

0:17:39.422 --> 0:17:41.861
<v Speaker 3>He's not a big instagra and I do think Ryan

0:17:41.901 --> 0:17:44.342
<v Speaker 3>posts too much about Rexham. So I did wonder if

0:17:44.381 --> 0:17:46.622
<v Speaker 3>that was just a little bit of overkill and Travis

0:17:46.702 --> 0:17:48.982
<v Speaker 3>was like enough. But last week there were all these

0:17:49.182 --> 0:17:53.102
<v Speaker 3>rumors about how Justin Baldoni court case Taylor subpoened. Why

0:17:53.101 --> 0:17:56.702
<v Speaker 3>would she be subpoened because of the mention that Blake

0:17:56.742 --> 0:18:00.501
<v Speaker 3>Lively made used her name really to leverage a bit

0:18:00.502 --> 0:18:05.102
<v Speaker 3>of power with Justin Baldoni. Very embarrassing according to Justin Baldoni. Yes, well,

0:18:05.141 --> 0:18:07.542
<v Speaker 3>it's it's a text message. We've read the texts. Oh yes,

0:18:07.782 --> 0:18:11.181
<v Speaker 3>So Taylor is upset, she's pissed. She's come home to

0:18:11.262 --> 0:18:13.982
<v Speaker 3>their home and she's upset. She's pulling out her hair,

0:18:14.022 --> 0:18:15.382
<v Speaker 3>she's going I've had a terrible day.

0:18:15.542 --> 0:18:17.621
<v Speaker 1>I would like to be removed from this narrative.

0:18:17.302 --> 0:18:21.421
<v Speaker 3>Exactly, and Travis wants to fix it, and he's going,

0:18:21.502 --> 0:18:24.821
<v Speaker 3>he's like, he's grunting because he's going, I really want

0:18:24.821 --> 0:18:26.262
<v Speaker 3>to help you, Taylor, but I don't know what to do.

0:18:26.302 --> 0:18:28.022
<v Speaker 3>And Taylor's going, you don't have to fix it. You

0:18:28.061 --> 0:18:30.262
<v Speaker 3>just have to listen to me and just be here

0:18:30.302 --> 0:18:32.902
<v Speaker 3>and hold me in this moment. But Travis is like, no, no,

0:18:33.022 --> 0:18:34.782
<v Speaker 3>I know what I'm going to do. And he gets

0:18:34.782 --> 0:18:35.622
<v Speaker 3>out his phone and.

0:18:35.581 --> 0:18:38.102
<v Speaker 1>She goes, no, Travis, don't, don't Travis, and.

0:18:38.061 --> 0:18:39.701
<v Speaker 4>Then he goes to his follower account. He goes, I'm

0:18:39.702 --> 0:18:40.422
<v Speaker 4>going to follow him.

0:18:40.621 --> 0:18:41.981
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to do it. I'm going to do it,

0:18:42.101 --> 0:18:44.941
<v Speaker 1>do it, and she says, watch me, watch me, Taylor, Travis.

0:18:44.581 --> 0:18:46.742
<v Speaker 3>And she also says, Travis, you never go on Instagram

0:18:46.782 --> 0:18:48.982
<v Speaker 3>like it doesn't make any difference, and he went unfollowed.

0:18:49.022 --> 0:18:50.102
<v Speaker 1>You're a TikTok guy.

0:18:50.222 --> 0:18:50.621
<v Speaker 4>Fixed it.

0:18:50.742 --> 0:18:53.262
<v Speaker 2>But wouldn't she have been like, but then everybody's going

0:18:53.341 --> 0:18:56.262
<v Speaker 2>to write about this and the narrative just keeps going.

0:18:56.341 --> 0:18:58.982
<v Speaker 4>But Travis had to do something. He couldn't just sit there.

0:18:58.901 --> 0:19:01.142
<v Speaker 2>Because he is an alpha male who likes to fix shit.

0:19:01.222 --> 0:19:02.222
<v Speaker 4>Yes, he had to do something.

0:19:02.341 --> 0:19:05.381
<v Speaker 1>He is very atack Cate one hundred percent.

0:19:06.901 --> 0:19:07.262
<v Speaker 2>She's got it.

0:19:07.502 --> 0:19:10.421
<v Speaker 1>The only I mean, it is just so glorious the

0:19:10.502 --> 0:19:13.901
<v Speaker 1>way that we have this actual proof. I mean, you

0:19:13.901 --> 0:19:16.942
<v Speaker 1>said it was scrollus gossip, but it is actually factually correct.

0:19:17.502 --> 0:19:19.262
<v Speaker 1>That Travis is no longer following.

0:19:19.661 --> 0:19:21.542
<v Speaker 2>I know for certain that he ever did.

0:19:21.581 --> 0:19:24.421
<v Speaker 1>There's empirical evidence. No, that's details, hold.

0:19:24.302 --> 0:19:29.141
<v Speaker 3>On, that doesn't feel importants important is that Blake still

0:19:29.182 --> 0:19:33.142
<v Speaker 3>follows Taylor. Importantly, Taylor follows no one, which complicates this narrative.

0:19:33.262 --> 0:19:38.702
<v Speaker 2>But that's because, yeah, Taylor, it would just be helpful

0:19:38.742 --> 0:19:39.982
<v Speaker 2>if we knew who she was unfollowing.

0:19:40.022 --> 0:19:43.862
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so look, there are so many people who are

0:19:44.141 --> 0:19:46.222
<v Speaker 1>pissed at being dragged into this.

0:19:46.101 --> 0:19:47.621
<v Speaker 4>Because Hugh Jackman's been dragged in.

0:19:47.861 --> 0:19:51.821
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and he's also exactly. This is not good. This

0:19:51.901 --> 0:19:53.782
<v Speaker 1>is not good for them. It's not good for their brand.

0:19:53.942 --> 0:19:55.821
<v Speaker 1>They do not have a dog in this fight. It

0:19:55.901 --> 0:19:58.421
<v Speaker 1>is not their monkey's not their circus, all of those things.

0:19:58.821 --> 0:20:03.862
<v Speaker 1>And yet can you even imagine Tree pains pissed pain,

0:20:04.341 --> 0:20:05.382
<v Speaker 1>She's been organized.

0:20:05.422 --> 0:20:09.661
<v Speaker 3>She's now of course Taylor's publicser.

0:20:09.381 --> 0:20:12.742
<v Speaker 1>She is, She's an icon. I think she's my roman

0:20:12.782 --> 0:20:16.262
<v Speaker 1>and part think about her all the time. What's she doing?

0:20:16.581 --> 0:20:20.262
<v Speaker 1>What's she doing? And I just imagine where she's like,

0:20:21.141 --> 0:20:24.141
<v Speaker 1>Fuck this, this is not part of our plan. What

0:20:24.182 --> 0:20:25.581
<v Speaker 1>are we going to do. We're going to unfollow.

0:20:26.101 --> 0:20:26.942
<v Speaker 4>We're going to unfollow?

0:20:27.982 --> 0:20:29.542
<v Speaker 1>Can you do this age?

0:20:29.581 --> 0:20:31.861
<v Speaker 3>Because there's no such thing as an accidental unfollow? No,

0:20:31.982 --> 0:20:32.742
<v Speaker 3>it's an active war.

0:20:32.821 --> 0:20:34.782
<v Speaker 1>I don't believe anyone that says you've been hacked.

0:20:35.742 --> 0:20:40.141
<v Speaker 3>Autism Telepathy a number one podcast and the fallout. Look,

0:20:40.182 --> 0:20:42.221
<v Speaker 3>this is a big topic and a story that has

0:20:42.262 --> 0:20:44.901
<v Speaker 3>spanned several months. But there was an article in The

0:20:44.942 --> 0:20:48.742
<v Speaker 3>Cut last week called I Can Hear thoughts. A podcast

0:20:48.982 --> 0:20:52.141
<v Speaker 3>called The Telepathy Tapes claims a group of non speaking

0:20:52.182 --> 0:20:55.901
<v Speaker 3>autistic people can read minds. The truth is more complicated.

0:20:56.502 --> 0:20:58.782
<v Speaker 3>We are going to start at the beginning. You might

0:20:58.861 --> 0:21:01.662
<v Speaker 3>remember that at the end of last year, particularly over

0:21:01.702 --> 0:21:06.581
<v Speaker 3>the summer holidays, a podcast called The Telepathy Tapes went viral.

0:21:06.661 --> 0:21:08.701
<v Speaker 3>I heard about it from out loud is yes me

0:21:08.782 --> 0:21:13.662
<v Speaker 3>too actually, and it was hosted by documentary filmmaker Ki Dickens,

0:21:14.061 --> 0:21:17.702
<v Speaker 3>and the series explored the theory that children with non

0:21:17.782 --> 0:21:23.061
<v Speaker 3>speaking autism were communicating with their parents telepathically. Hear me

0:21:23.101 --> 0:21:25.542
<v Speaker 3>out because I listened to this podcast at the time

0:21:25.581 --> 0:21:29.582
<v Speaker 3>and found parts of it really compelling. So it begins

0:21:29.621 --> 0:21:32.902
<v Speaker 3>by saying Ki Dickens says, for decades, a very specific

0:21:32.901 --> 0:21:36.902
<v Speaker 3>group of people have been claiming telepathy is happening. Nobody

0:21:36.901 --> 0:21:39.421
<v Speaker 3>has believed them, nobody has listened to them. But on

0:21:39.462 --> 0:21:42.502
<v Speaker 3>this podcast we do. And in the same way that

0:21:42.581 --> 0:21:46.181
<v Speaker 3>when someone is blind, their other senses heighten, like they

0:21:46.262 --> 0:21:48.782
<v Speaker 3>might have a furgus. It's a smell, yes, exactly right,

0:21:48.821 --> 0:21:53.061
<v Speaker 3>and that's called sensory compensation. The idea was that kids

0:21:53.101 --> 0:21:57.101
<v Speaker 3>with non speaking autism could in some cases read the

0:21:57.182 --> 0:22:01.581
<v Speaker 3>minds of their parents or teachers, and this was uncovered

0:22:01.621 --> 0:22:04.821
<v Speaker 3>in the podcast through a process called spelling. I had

0:22:04.861 --> 0:22:07.061
<v Speaker 3>never heard of this before. It is a two way

0:22:07.101 --> 0:22:12.581
<v Speaker 3>communication system whereby the non speaking child points to letters

0:22:12.621 --> 0:22:14.621
<v Speaker 3>on a board and is guided by a parent and

0:22:14.661 --> 0:22:16.462
<v Speaker 3>that makes out words, and sometimes.

0:22:16.061 --> 0:22:18.742
<v Speaker 1>The parent is holding the child's hand, or the child

0:22:18.782 --> 0:22:20.702
<v Speaker 1>is holding the parents' hand and guiding them.

0:22:20.661 --> 0:22:24.141
<v Speaker 3>And guiding them exactly right. And listening to it blew

0:22:24.222 --> 0:22:26.061
<v Speaker 3>my mind. I am open to this stuff. There were

0:22:26.101 --> 0:22:29.621
<v Speaker 3>some amazing cases of a parent opening a book or

0:22:29.782 --> 0:22:31.861
<v Speaker 3>reading a passage and the child being able to make

0:22:31.861 --> 0:22:33.741
<v Speaker 3>out what was in the book. Again, this is not

0:22:33.782 --> 0:22:36.861
<v Speaker 3>a visual medium, it's audio, So in the audio sense,

0:22:36.901 --> 0:22:38.582
<v Speaker 3>I was going, this is pretty convincing.

0:22:38.661 --> 0:22:41.582
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. So the podcast, the host did a whole lot

0:22:41.621 --> 0:22:45.862
<v Speaker 1>of experiments which she took the audience through in graphic detail,

0:22:46.061 --> 0:22:48.181
<v Speaker 1>and they were quite repetitive. So she came in with

0:22:48.182 --> 0:22:52.382
<v Speaker 1>a fairly cynical mindset. And it wasn't all just spelling.

0:22:52.422 --> 0:22:55.061
<v Speaker 1>Some of it was they'd put up a screen and

0:22:55.101 --> 0:22:59.262
<v Speaker 1>they'd show the mother a word or something, and then

0:22:59.422 --> 0:23:01.222
<v Speaker 1>the child on the other side of the screen, without

0:23:01.262 --> 0:23:03.502
<v Speaker 1>having any contact with the mother, would have to write

0:23:03.542 --> 0:23:06.181
<v Speaker 1>down or whatever what that word was exactly, And the

0:23:06.262 --> 0:23:09.502
<v Speaker 1>level of accuracy was very high in many of these cases.

0:23:09.661 --> 0:23:12.581
<v Speaker 3>So the podcast grew and grew, and now it has

0:23:12.581 --> 0:23:16.422
<v Speaker 3>amassed more than fifteen million downloads. But with that popularity

0:23:16.542 --> 0:23:19.461
<v Speaker 3>came a lot of criticism. There was a lot that

0:23:19.502 --> 0:23:23.462
<v Speaker 3>Dickens hadn't included. For example, the spelling method has been

0:23:23.702 --> 0:23:27.901
<v Speaker 3>routinely disproven, and that is because if especially if it's

0:23:27.942 --> 0:23:32.022
<v Speaker 3>a parent and a non speaking autistic child, there's unconscious

0:23:32.061 --> 0:23:35.462
<v Speaker 3>cues literally unconscious. They have no idea that they're making them,

0:23:35.621 --> 0:23:38.821
<v Speaker 3>but they can queue that. Oh yeah, you're getting the

0:23:38.821 --> 0:23:42.862
<v Speaker 3>word dog right. These kids are especially good at that.

0:23:42.982 --> 0:23:46.581
<v Speaker 1>So almost like predictive text, but it's like the parent predicting.

0:23:46.302 --> 0:23:49.222
<v Speaker 3>Exactly, so spelling. Lots of criticism that it really didn't

0:23:49.222 --> 0:23:52.861
<v Speaker 3>go into. And the second really big criticism was that

0:23:52.901 --> 0:23:55.061
<v Speaker 3>it fell into a trope. And this is a term

0:23:55.101 --> 0:23:58.661
<v Speaker 3>that a lot of disability advocates use called super crip,

0:23:58.982 --> 0:24:01.341
<v Speaker 3>and it is a term that describes a tendency we

0:24:01.462 --> 0:24:05.221
<v Speaker 3>have to present a disabled person as having extraordinary or

0:24:05.262 --> 0:24:09.461
<v Speaker 3>magical abilities that makes them worthwhile, So think like rain Men.

0:24:10.542 --> 0:24:14.781
<v Speaker 3>Since its release, Dickens has been offered documentary deals. All

0:24:14.861 --> 0:24:17.382
<v Speaker 3>the studios that said no to her original idea now

0:24:17.422 --> 0:24:21.941
<v Speaker 3>saying yes. But instead she's crowdfunding for an independent second season.

0:24:23.262 --> 0:24:26.262
<v Speaker 3>So there's magic, spirituality, the metaphysical, whatever you want to

0:24:26.262 --> 0:24:30.622
<v Speaker 3>call it. Are these conversations worth having or can they

0:24:30.661 --> 0:24:33.581
<v Speaker 3>do more harm than good Holly?

0:24:34.022 --> 0:24:36.621
<v Speaker 2>It's so complicated because one of the things that really

0:24:36.661 --> 0:24:39.982
<v Speaker 2>comes through, both in the podcast and in the writing

0:24:39.982 --> 0:24:43.262
<v Speaker 2>about the podcast when they're talking about these families is

0:24:43.302 --> 0:24:47.382
<v Speaker 2>that these are very often parents who are in impossibly

0:24:47.422 --> 0:24:52.542
<v Speaker 2>difficult circumstances. It is incredibly difficult work to be looking

0:24:52.542 --> 0:24:58.742
<v Speaker 2>after a child with severe disabilities and nonverbal, sometimes violent,

0:24:59.502 --> 0:25:03.942
<v Speaker 2>very difficult to predict control. A lot of the ideas

0:25:04.061 --> 0:25:07.022
<v Speaker 2>of you know, the milestones and the life that you

0:25:07.101 --> 0:25:13.502
<v Speaker 2>might have had together is derailed, and carers they're being

0:25:13.621 --> 0:25:18.061
<v Speaker 2>asked every day to be entirely selfless, like entirely selfless,

0:25:18.061 --> 0:25:21.341
<v Speaker 2>and the intensity often of that bond between the carer

0:25:21.462 --> 0:25:23.821
<v Speaker 2>and the child. To your point Jesse about whether or

0:25:23.821 --> 0:25:27.462
<v Speaker 2>not the spelling you know it's not intentional, but there

0:25:27.502 --> 0:25:30.901
<v Speaker 2>is almost a telepathy between those two is not surprising either.

0:25:31.542 --> 0:25:34.302
<v Speaker 2>So the idea that the parents are the ones who've

0:25:34.302 --> 0:25:37.982
<v Speaker 2>been saying, there's something special about my child and people

0:25:38.022 --> 0:25:41.581
<v Speaker 2>need to understand it. There's something otherworldly about my child.

0:25:41.661 --> 0:25:45.262
<v Speaker 2>We can communicate in ways that you don't understand. I

0:25:45.341 --> 0:25:49.422
<v Speaker 2>have a lot of empathy and sympathy for right because

0:25:50.422 --> 0:25:54.542
<v Speaker 2>the general able world looks at people with very severe

0:25:54.581 --> 0:25:57.181
<v Speaker 2>disability and does like to be really brutal about it.

0:25:57.222 --> 0:26:00.341
<v Speaker 2>They question, what's the point of that? You know what

0:26:00.341 --> 0:26:03.221
<v Speaker 2>I mean? To your point before about the problem with

0:26:03.381 --> 0:26:07.262
<v Speaker 2>the magical myth is that somehow we need to be

0:26:07.381 --> 0:26:11.742
<v Speaker 2>validating why people are sure, or why people are interesting,

0:26:11.821 --> 0:26:15.101
<v Speaker 2>or why people even deigned to exist you know and matter,

0:26:15.581 --> 0:26:18.901
<v Speaker 2>So I have so much sympathy for that. I don't

0:26:18.901 --> 0:26:20.581
<v Speaker 2>think I can answer the question of whether or not

0:26:20.581 --> 0:26:23.302
<v Speaker 2>I think these conversations should be had. Because am I

0:26:23.422 --> 0:26:26.542
<v Speaker 2>glad that those families got to tell their stories. We

0:26:26.581 --> 0:26:30.141
<v Speaker 2>all learned something about their children. Yeah, I am. I

0:26:30.141 --> 0:26:33.222
<v Speaker 2>don't know that. I think it's entirely regrettable, But then

0:26:33.262 --> 0:26:36.221
<v Speaker 2>I'm not informed enough about the other side of this

0:26:36.302 --> 0:26:39.101
<v Speaker 2>conversation to be able to say, oh, yes, it's definitely damaging.

0:26:39.302 --> 0:26:41.502
<v Speaker 3>There was a quote in I think it was actually

0:26:41.542 --> 0:26:43.502
<v Speaker 3>in the podcast, but it's in the cut article where

0:26:43.661 --> 0:26:46.502
<v Speaker 3>a mother says, I was asking myself was he even

0:26:46.542 --> 0:26:46.902
<v Speaker 3>in there?

0:26:47.302 --> 0:26:47.462
<v Speaker 5>Right?

0:26:47.581 --> 0:26:51.302
<v Speaker 3>Because if you've got a child who cannot speak, who

0:26:51.302 --> 0:26:53.902
<v Speaker 3>cannot say I love you, who cannot.

0:26:54.621 --> 0:26:56.982
<v Speaker 4>What they want, their desires.

0:26:56.661 --> 0:26:58.742
<v Speaker 2>And that child was sort of six foot tall and

0:26:59.101 --> 0:27:01.621
<v Speaker 2>two hundred pounds and is a human and now not

0:27:01.782 --> 0:27:04.941
<v Speaker 2>a child in your life who your entire life is

0:27:04.982 --> 0:27:08.862
<v Speaker 2>oriented around their needs and caring for them, she knows

0:27:08.901 --> 0:27:10.262
<v Speaker 2>him better than any one in the world.

0:27:10.462 --> 0:27:13.302
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and I have no doubt that they have a

0:27:13.422 --> 0:27:17.982
<v Speaker 3>method of understanding one another that maybe you or I

0:27:18.022 --> 0:27:19.101
<v Speaker 3>couldn't understand.

0:27:19.141 --> 0:27:20.942
<v Speaker 4>And I think they're basically mean there are things.

0:27:20.702 --> 0:27:24.422
<v Speaker 1>That you can't explain, you know, bonds between parents and children,

0:27:24.742 --> 0:27:28.662
<v Speaker 1>or between siblings or between twins. I don't think everything

0:27:28.702 --> 0:27:32.381
<v Speaker 1>can necessarily be proven scientifically, And I guess I'd have

0:27:32.422 --> 0:27:34.941
<v Speaker 1>to ask what's the harm in it? Like, does it

0:27:34.982 --> 0:27:39.302
<v Speaker 1>even matter whether it's able to be proven or not proven.

0:27:40.222 --> 0:27:42.702
<v Speaker 1>I just don't see the harm. And if it brings

0:27:42.702 --> 0:27:47.701
<v Speaker 1>some comfort or some utility to the people involved, what

0:27:47.742 --> 0:27:49.222
<v Speaker 1>does it matter what any of us think?

0:27:49.341 --> 0:27:52.941
<v Speaker 3>So the critics would say that it contributes to an

0:27:52.982 --> 0:27:56.901
<v Speaker 3>othering of going. These people are other, they are not

0:27:57.101 --> 0:28:02.782
<v Speaker 3>like us. We're kind of projecting this magical, almost monstrous

0:28:03.262 --> 0:28:04.262
<v Speaker 3>thing on them, which.

0:28:04.182 --> 0:28:06.941
<v Speaker 1>But is it monstrous or is it elevating their status?

0:28:06.982 --> 0:28:11.222
<v Speaker 1>Because people with disabilities are among the lowest status, most

0:28:11.341 --> 0:28:16.261
<v Speaker 1>vulnerable people in our community. And by saying no, what

0:28:16.341 --> 0:28:19.902
<v Speaker 1>you see on the outside, there's more going on, doesn't that,

0:28:20.141 --> 0:28:22.701
<v Speaker 1>if anything, elevate their status.

0:28:22.182 --> 0:28:24.542
<v Speaker 3>At the other extreme, And this is in the cart

0:28:24.702 --> 0:28:29.821
<v Speaker 3>article is false accusations like they've had instances of spelling

0:28:30.422 --> 0:28:34.901
<v Speaker 3>where they believe that they have elicited some sort of

0:28:35.742 --> 0:28:39.742
<v Speaker 3>disclosure about an allegation that they've then gone Has this

0:28:39.902 --> 0:28:44.102
<v Speaker 3>been reinforced by the person who is helping them. Spell

0:28:44.661 --> 0:28:48.542
<v Speaker 3>are we projecting what this person wants? And is there

0:28:48.542 --> 0:28:50.741
<v Speaker 3>then going to be an investment and a focus on

0:28:50.782 --> 0:28:55.422
<v Speaker 3>a method of communication that maybe doesn't work and if

0:28:55.462 --> 0:28:58.342
<v Speaker 3>it doesn't work, And I think that anyone who knows

0:28:58.382 --> 0:29:02.461
<v Speaker 3>anything about the NDIS and disability support knows that the

0:29:02.502 --> 0:29:05.502
<v Speaker 3>resources and the time are finite. You also don't want

0:29:05.502 --> 0:29:08.342
<v Speaker 3>to give families false hope or make someone feel like

0:29:08.342 --> 0:29:11.022
<v Speaker 3>if your child can't do this, there's something wrong with

0:29:11.062 --> 0:29:13.741
<v Speaker 3>that child. And so I can sort of see that.

0:29:13.902 --> 0:29:17.382
<v Speaker 3>But listening to these parents, I thought, in terms of

0:29:17.422 --> 0:29:21.302
<v Speaker 3>status and who we listen to, do we listen to

0:29:21.302 --> 0:29:24.542
<v Speaker 3>anyone less than the parent of a child with autism?

0:29:24.982 --> 0:29:30.941
<v Speaker 3>We don't afford them a platform. And there would be moments,

0:29:30.982 --> 0:29:33.902
<v Speaker 3>there would be so much that we can learn about

0:29:34.622 --> 0:29:38.462
<v Speaker 3>humanity and connection through these people that has otherwise been

0:29:39.142 --> 0:29:43.502
<v Speaker 3>totally erased. And I do think that if you are

0:29:44.422 --> 0:29:47.701
<v Speaker 3>non speaking, your brain would be working differently in a

0:29:47.742 --> 0:29:52.342
<v Speaker 3>way that I find absolutely fascinating. I wished when I

0:29:52.462 --> 0:29:54.262
<v Speaker 3>was listening to all of this, I wish that my

0:29:54.302 --> 0:29:56.662
<v Speaker 3>grandmother was around who raised a child with a disability,

0:29:56.661 --> 0:30:01.782
<v Speaker 3>and then a grandchild and had the most remarkable relationships

0:30:01.782 --> 0:30:05.021
<v Speaker 3>with both of them. And I can see with my cousin,

0:30:05.262 --> 0:30:07.102
<v Speaker 3>I can see how the world sees him as someone

0:30:07.142 --> 0:30:10.902
<v Speaker 3>with an intellectual disability who can't read or write, can't

0:30:10.902 --> 0:30:13.421
<v Speaker 3>write his own name. There are things he can do

0:30:13.502 --> 0:30:15.382
<v Speaker 3>that I will never be able to do. And you know,

0:30:15.462 --> 0:30:18.222
<v Speaker 3>sometimes we laugh about being able to recite an entire

0:30:18.262 --> 0:30:19.822
<v Speaker 3>train line. He can get on a train and end

0:30:19.902 --> 0:30:22.782
<v Speaker 3>up exactly where, like sense of direction, that sort of stuff,

0:30:23.222 --> 0:30:26.182
<v Speaker 3>And I think people who love people with disabilities want

0:30:26.182 --> 0:30:27.022
<v Speaker 3>the world to know about that.

0:30:28.182 --> 0:30:31.422
<v Speaker 2>After the break globe stopping carb news from the High

0:30:31.422 --> 0:30:33.701
<v Speaker 2>Priestess Gwyneth Paltrow.

0:30:34.022 --> 0:30:36.742
<v Speaker 1>Every Tuesday and Thursday, we drop new segments of Mom

0:30:36.782 --> 0:30:38.582
<v Speaker 1>and Me are Out Loud just for Mamma and Me

0:30:38.702 --> 0:30:41.221
<v Speaker 1>as subscribers. Follow the link in the show notes to

0:30:41.222 --> 0:30:43.542
<v Speaker 1>get your daily dose of out Loud and a big

0:30:43.582 --> 0:30:54.462
<v Speaker 1>thank you to everyone who is already subscribed. Megan the

0:30:54.542 --> 0:30:57.701
<v Speaker 1>Duchess of Jam has done her first long form podcast

0:30:57.782 --> 0:31:02.181
<v Speaker 1>interview on someone Else's show. Now it's a little bit

0:31:02.222 --> 0:31:04.981
<v Speaker 1>of a spurious claim to make because she's now hosting

0:31:05.022 --> 0:31:08.661
<v Speaker 1>her second podcast. She's done a lot of podcasting, but

0:31:08.782 --> 0:31:11.582
<v Speaker 1>now she's on the other side of the microphone a

0:31:11.622 --> 0:31:14.661
<v Speaker 1>woman called Jamie Kernlema, who I hadn't heard of, but

0:31:14.782 --> 0:31:19.302
<v Speaker 1>turns out she was the founder of it Cosmetics.

0:31:18.902 --> 0:31:20.822
<v Speaker 4>Great Great Foundation, Great Foundations.

0:31:20.862 --> 0:31:23.462
<v Speaker 1>She then sold that for many millions or hundreds of

0:31:23.462 --> 0:31:27.181
<v Speaker 1>millions of dollars to Loreal. And she lives next door

0:31:27.222 --> 0:31:31.262
<v Speaker 1>to Meghan and Harry in Montecito. So she has a

0:31:31.302 --> 0:31:35.622
<v Speaker 1>podcast and it's kind of woo woo. It's very you know, American,

0:31:35.902 --> 0:31:40.102
<v Speaker 1>sort of earnest. And the podcast interview she's done with Meghan,

0:31:40.222 --> 0:31:43.021
<v Speaker 1>her friend. They took a lot about their friendships. It's

0:31:43.062 --> 0:31:46.261
<v Speaker 1>a rich text for discussion at another time. But this

0:31:46.342 --> 0:31:50.421
<v Speaker 1>piece of parenting advice has particularly excited everyone, and I

0:31:50.462 --> 0:31:52.582
<v Speaker 1>need to play it for your reactions.

0:31:52.982 --> 0:31:56.261
<v Speaker 6>And so I'd created for the kids these email addresses

0:31:56.661 --> 0:31:59.421
<v Speaker 6>that names again that you would never guess, that I

0:31:59.462 --> 0:32:01.142
<v Speaker 6>will give them at some point in their lives when

0:32:01.142 --> 0:32:04.022
<v Speaker 6>they're older. But before I got ABD, almost every night

0:32:04.502 --> 0:32:07.421
<v Speaker 6>I email them. Wow, I email because it doesn't have

0:32:07.462 --> 0:32:09.342
<v Speaker 6>to be a heavy left and you email them like,

0:32:10.262 --> 0:32:12.102
<v Speaker 6>here's a report card from today, Oh my gosh, she

0:32:12.142 --> 0:32:14.342
<v Speaker 6>said the funniest thing this morning. Or here's a picture

0:32:14.382 --> 0:32:16.941
<v Speaker 6>of you two having breakfast, or here's you playing with

0:32:16.982 --> 0:32:19.742
<v Speaker 6>the things that you're not going to frame, the things

0:32:19.742 --> 0:32:21.302
<v Speaker 6>that you're not going to put pen to people in

0:32:21.702 --> 0:32:24.542
<v Speaker 6>a journal. But they will end up at one point

0:32:24.542 --> 0:32:26.862
<v Speaker 6>in their life, maybe when they're sixteen or when they're eighteen,

0:32:27.142 --> 0:32:29.382
<v Speaker 6>that I say, here's an email that I've been keeping

0:32:29.422 --> 0:32:29.782
<v Speaker 6>for you.

0:32:30.022 --> 0:32:31.542
<v Speaker 2>I have full body chills right now.

0:32:31.661 --> 0:32:34.982
<v Speaker 1>I have a question, Jesse, if you got full body chills.

0:32:35.502 --> 0:32:38.701
<v Speaker 3>That is so lovely that Megan does that for her

0:32:38.702 --> 0:32:43.702
<v Speaker 3>two children. I, like Megan, had the very best of intentions.

0:32:43.902 --> 0:32:48.382
<v Speaker 3>And when Luna was maybe six weeks old, and I

0:32:48.382 --> 0:32:54.022
<v Speaker 3>would still certifiably omnal in a very strange place, I

0:32:54.062 --> 0:32:56.782
<v Speaker 3>set up an email address for little Luna and I

0:32:56.822 --> 0:33:01.102
<v Speaker 3>wrote her an email about how she is God.

0:33:02.502 --> 0:33:05.382
<v Speaker 2>Yes, of course is the.

0:33:05.302 --> 0:33:09.462
<v Speaker 3>Best thing, and she is so loved and I don't

0:33:09.462 --> 0:33:11.542
<v Speaker 3>know coherent, I don't think it makes sense. But I

0:33:11.582 --> 0:33:13.662
<v Speaker 3>sent her that email because I was going to send

0:33:13.661 --> 0:33:15.941
<v Speaker 3>her an email every week about.

0:33:15.702 --> 0:33:17.982
<v Speaker 4>All the little things, only every week, only every week.

0:33:18.222 --> 0:33:19.742
<v Speaker 4>I'm not like Megan Dragon the chain.

0:33:20.462 --> 0:33:24.181
<v Speaker 3>And then this strange thing happened where I went back

0:33:24.182 --> 0:33:28.342
<v Speaker 3>to work and that email address.

0:33:28.302 --> 0:33:30.622
<v Speaker 4>I couldn't tell you what it is. I couldn't tell

0:33:30.622 --> 0:33:33.261
<v Speaker 4>you how to log in, could not be any of that.

0:33:33.582 --> 0:33:37.022
<v Speaker 3>And then for her first birthday, I got a scrapbook

0:33:37.382 --> 0:33:38.982
<v Speaker 3>because we didn't do anything. We didn't have a party

0:33:39.022 --> 0:33:41.942
<v Speaker 3>or anything, and I went, everyone should write a message

0:33:42.062 --> 0:33:46.062
<v Speaker 3>about something like a funny lunar story, or like, you know,

0:33:46.182 --> 0:33:48.862
<v Speaker 3>the memory that we'll never remember. And so I got

0:33:48.862 --> 0:33:50.902
<v Speaker 3>everyone to write, and I got these markers and I didn't.

0:33:51.822 --> 0:33:54.662
<v Speaker 4>Maya wrote in it. I don't know if anyone else did.

0:33:56.062 --> 0:33:56.862
<v Speaker 1>No one else did.

0:33:57.022 --> 0:33:58.342
<v Speaker 4>Well, I've got good news about that.

0:33:58.542 --> 0:34:02.342
<v Speaker 3>I think Luca threw it out because I can't find it.

0:34:03.422 --> 0:34:07.102
<v Speaker 2>I have questions, one big question. When Lily, bet or

0:34:07.222 --> 0:34:10.702
<v Speaker 2>Archie or any of these precious chi children turn eighteen

0:34:10.742 --> 0:34:14.222
<v Speaker 2>and are presented with perhaps a print out, who knows

0:34:14.262 --> 0:34:19.462
<v Speaker 2>of all the emails every day for eighteen years of

0:34:19.582 --> 0:34:22.662
<v Speaker 2>things that Mum thought that were really exciting and cute

0:34:22.701 --> 0:34:25.022
<v Speaker 2>that we did. That time we shoved a piece of

0:34:25.102 --> 0:34:27.941
<v Speaker 2>lego upon nose, that time we kicked down in.

0:34:27.902 --> 0:34:29.182
<v Speaker 1>The balls, that time.

0:34:29.422 --> 0:34:32.142
<v Speaker 2>You know, like, what do you do with all that?

0:34:32.582 --> 0:34:33.542
<v Speaker 2>What do you do with it?

0:34:33.902 --> 0:34:34.142
<v Speaker 5>Yeah?

0:34:34.302 --> 0:34:36.382
<v Speaker 4>I think there's such thing as too many memories.

0:34:36.422 --> 0:34:39.261
<v Speaker 2>And then the other question I have is are we

0:34:39.422 --> 0:34:44.661
<v Speaker 2>surprised that there is a generation of young people who

0:34:44.661 --> 0:34:49.781
<v Speaker 2>will not take direction from their bosses? Like I've got

0:34:50.142 --> 0:34:52.622
<v Speaker 2>eighteen years of emails telling me that I'm the most

0:34:52.661 --> 0:34:57.462
<v Speaker 2>special little snowflake that ever existed in the entire universe,

0:34:57.502 --> 0:35:03.902
<v Speaker 2>and that every utterance out of my mouth is genius, creative, beautiful,

0:35:03.942 --> 0:35:05.102
<v Speaker 2>like to precious moment?

0:35:07.102 --> 0:35:10.382
<v Speaker 4>Are you sending me an email with all my cute

0:35:10.582 --> 0:35:11.262
<v Speaker 4>little quirks?

0:35:11.342 --> 0:35:12.142
<v Speaker 2>I always appreciation.

0:35:12.181 --> 0:35:14.221
<v Speaker 1>She loved the part where she said, it's not the

0:35:14.221 --> 0:35:17.302
<v Speaker 1>stuff that you'd put in your journals, So you're already journalist.

0:35:17.701 --> 0:35:19.022
<v Speaker 2>And putting things in frames.

0:35:19.062 --> 0:35:22.622
<v Speaker 1>So we're writing the three every night, one to yourself

0:35:23.902 --> 0:35:27.502
<v Speaker 1>and one to each of her children. Is a lot

0:35:27.582 --> 0:35:28.102
<v Speaker 1>going on.

0:35:29.982 --> 0:35:30.821
<v Speaker 2>The mental load.

0:35:31.181 --> 0:35:33.821
<v Speaker 3>Just why people aren't having children. Sorry, it's why we're

0:35:33.822 --> 0:35:35.942
<v Speaker 3>not having children. Too many emails, too much.

0:35:36.462 --> 0:35:38.502
<v Speaker 2>I just need to make it clear that whenever you

0:35:38.661 --> 0:35:40.901
<v Speaker 2>listen to Megan lately, and because she's on so many things,

0:35:40.902 --> 0:35:42.941
<v Speaker 2>I've been listened to her a lot. No one has

0:35:42.982 --> 0:35:45.262
<v Speaker 2>loved the identity you of new mum more than Megan.

0:35:45.382 --> 0:35:49.181
<v Speaker 2>She is loving it, and I get it She's ain't

0:35:49.221 --> 0:35:51.462
<v Speaker 2>that new, but but you know she loves being a

0:35:51.502 --> 0:35:55.222
<v Speaker 2>toddler mom, a school mom. The school she she loves, loves,

0:35:55.261 --> 0:35:59.702
<v Speaker 2>loves it. While we're talking about my favorite Perfect Humans,

0:35:59.741 --> 0:36:02.942
<v Speaker 2>best friends and dream Brunch companions, there has been news

0:36:03.261 --> 0:36:06.661
<v Speaker 2>in Gwyneth pultrow Land that we need to discuss. You

0:36:06.741 --> 0:36:10.421
<v Speaker 2>might have seen it because it made headlines everywhere from

0:36:10.462 --> 0:36:14.781
<v Speaker 2>news dot com to the esteemed BBC. The news is

0:36:14.822 --> 0:36:20.181
<v Speaker 2>that Gwyneth is sometimes sometimes eating carbs.

0:36:21.022 --> 0:36:21.462
<v Speaker 1>I know.

0:36:22.062 --> 0:36:24.502
<v Speaker 2>This is what she said on her podcast Goop in

0:36:24.542 --> 0:36:27.382
<v Speaker 2>an episode called for the Love of Food.

0:36:27.822 --> 0:36:31.102
<v Speaker 7>It's the reason Brad and I became paleo a few

0:36:31.181 --> 0:36:34.502
<v Speaker 7>years ago now, although I'm a little sick of it,

0:36:34.622 --> 0:36:38.301
<v Speaker 7>if I'm honest, and getting back into eating some sour

0:36:38.422 --> 0:36:42.902
<v Speaker 7>dilk bread and some cheese. There I said it, a

0:36:42.902 --> 0:36:47.822
<v Speaker 7>little pasta after being strict with it for so long.

0:36:48.221 --> 0:36:53.702
<v Speaker 2>There I said it. I said it, I ate cheese sometimes. Okay,

0:36:54.661 --> 0:36:59.542
<v Speaker 2>a little bit of context. I'm just feeling so giggly

0:36:59.582 --> 0:37:02.822
<v Speaker 2>because after Megan and then Gwynneth, it's just a whisper.

0:37:06.781 --> 0:37:09.502
<v Speaker 3>I imagine a little bit of pasta like toyar two pieces,

0:37:09.741 --> 0:37:12.622
<v Speaker 3>like you either have a bowl of pasta that's bigger

0:37:12.622 --> 0:37:13.102
<v Speaker 3>than your face.

0:37:13.102 --> 0:37:15.062
<v Speaker 4>So you don't have between.

0:37:15.142 --> 0:37:18.542
<v Speaker 2>Come on now some context. Gwyneth was talking for thirty

0:37:18.582 --> 0:37:21.981
<v Speaker 2>six minutes about her relationship with food. She talked about

0:37:21.982 --> 0:37:23.622
<v Speaker 2>how she's always been a foodie. She did all the

0:37:23.701 --> 0:37:26.142
<v Speaker 2>usual drinking and smoking and coffee years, and then when

0:37:26.142 --> 0:37:29.102
<v Speaker 2>her father became ill with throat cancer in her mid twenties,

0:37:29.142 --> 0:37:35.022
<v Speaker 2>she became obsessed with food as medicine. She became hardcore macrobiotic,

0:37:35.102 --> 0:37:37.742
<v Speaker 2>which is the first time I'd ever heard the word macrobiotic,

0:37:37.822 --> 0:37:40.062
<v Speaker 2>because she and Madonna were bestie to remember this era

0:37:40.221 --> 0:37:45.781
<v Speaker 2>mean macrobiotic exactly. She and Madonna and Tracy Anderson the

0:37:45.822 --> 0:37:48.502
<v Speaker 2>Trainer were always tripping around London with their yoga mats,

0:37:48.502 --> 0:37:50.902
<v Speaker 2>and every story about any event they went to was

0:37:50.942 --> 0:37:52.502
<v Speaker 2>always like they wouldn't need it, they had to have

0:37:52.542 --> 0:37:55.582
<v Speaker 2>their browin rise and their lentils blah blah blah. Anyway, then,

0:37:55.622 --> 0:37:57.381
<v Speaker 2>as we all know, she went on, she created goops,

0:37:57.422 --> 0:37:59.582
<v Speaker 2>she wrote cookbooks, and she's gone through phases of saying

0:37:59.582 --> 0:38:03.262
<v Speaker 2>she's loosened up. But in this chat she was saying

0:38:03.542 --> 0:38:07.382
<v Speaker 2>that she and Brad had been mostly paleo for years,

0:38:07.422 --> 0:38:09.982
<v Speaker 2>and paleo if you don't know, God bless you.

0:38:09.982 --> 0:38:10.582
<v Speaker 1>If you don't know.

0:38:10.741 --> 0:38:11.301
<v Speaker 4>I don't know.

0:38:11.542 --> 0:38:15.622
<v Speaker 2>It's about protein, no carbs, and an obsession with everything

0:38:15.701 --> 0:38:17.462
<v Speaker 2>being clean in inverted commerce.

0:38:17.661 --> 0:38:20.542
<v Speaker 4>So no Eminem's definitely no Eminem's.

0:38:21.422 --> 0:38:24.902
<v Speaker 2>Come on, Jesse Mia, I know you have thoughts on

0:38:24.942 --> 0:38:27.821
<v Speaker 2>the impact Gwyneth and other people like when it's food

0:38:27.862 --> 0:38:31.502
<v Speaker 2>conversations have on women. Do you think that famous women

0:38:31.661 --> 0:38:34.462
<v Speaker 2>should just shut the f up about what they're eating

0:38:34.462 --> 0:38:35.382
<v Speaker 2>and what they're not eating.

0:38:35.582 --> 0:38:37.582
<v Speaker 1>Everyone can say what they want, but I think what's

0:38:37.622 --> 0:38:42.542
<v Speaker 1>important to remember always is the subtext, which is that

0:38:43.022 --> 0:38:47.181
<v Speaker 1>famous women have more pressure to conform to beauty standards

0:38:47.181 --> 0:38:51.342
<v Speaker 1>than probably any other women, and that means a life

0:38:51.542 --> 0:38:55.942
<v Speaker 1>of restricted eating. And sometimes that restricted eating has a

0:38:56.022 --> 0:39:00.942
<v Speaker 1>name like paleo or epkins or gluten free. I know

0:39:00.982 --> 0:39:03.181
<v Speaker 1>that there are some people who are legitimately gluten free,

0:39:03.422 --> 0:39:06.542
<v Speaker 1>but I also know from speaking to eating disorders experts

0:39:07.142 --> 0:39:10.301
<v Speaker 1>that often you don't say you're on a diet, you

0:39:10.302 --> 0:39:13.742
<v Speaker 1>don't say you're restricting, but you start becoming a vegan

0:39:13.822 --> 0:39:18.741
<v Speaker 1>or you start cutting out clean, restricting things. Having said that,

0:39:18.942 --> 0:39:21.982
<v Speaker 1>I really can see that connection, and I thought that

0:39:22.142 --> 0:39:24.982
<v Speaker 1>was interesting that she's I think she even used the

0:39:24.982 --> 0:39:28.862
<v Speaker 1>word of thorexia, which is that idea of when clean

0:39:29.062 --> 0:39:33.222
<v Speaker 1>eating becomes an obsession and a way to really justify

0:39:33.382 --> 0:39:37.461
<v Speaker 1>extreme restriction, and it's an eating disorder dressed up as

0:39:37.982 --> 0:39:41.862
<v Speaker 1>a healthy activity. And you can see that she felt

0:39:41.862 --> 0:39:43.502
<v Speaker 1>like her life was out of control. She was at

0:39:43.502 --> 0:39:45.302
<v Speaker 1>the height of her fame. She just went an oscar.

0:39:45.942 --> 0:39:49.461
<v Speaker 1>Her father was dying. He'd been a smoker and had

0:39:49.462 --> 0:39:50.982
<v Speaker 1>not been a bastion of health.

0:39:50.862 --> 0:39:52.942
<v Speaker 2>And she says he loved food right going out to

0:39:52.982 --> 0:39:54.381
<v Speaker 2>den his favorite thing to do.

0:39:54.781 --> 0:39:57.502
<v Speaker 1>So the idea that there could be an answer, and

0:39:57.542 --> 0:40:00.701
<v Speaker 1>that somehow she could control and help not just him,

0:40:00.741 --> 0:40:02.781
<v Speaker 1>but also everyone else in her family so that she

0:40:02.822 --> 0:40:06.062
<v Speaker 1>didn't lose anyone else. I can see this idea of

0:40:06.102 --> 0:40:08.582
<v Speaker 1>food as medicine can be a slippery slope, and I

0:40:08.582 --> 0:40:11.982
<v Speaker 1>think it can be very deductive. But I think the

0:40:12.022 --> 0:40:15.821
<v Speaker 1>subtext to all of this is skinny. And I think

0:40:15.822 --> 0:40:19.062
<v Speaker 1>that you've got gen X women who grew up in

0:40:19.221 --> 0:40:22.781
<v Speaker 1>the absolute center of diet culture. You know, from the

0:40:22.781 --> 0:40:26.982
<v Speaker 1>supermodels to heroin Chic to grunge to all of that.

0:40:27.701 --> 0:40:31.222
<v Speaker 1>It was very much about restricted eating. And I think

0:40:31.261 --> 0:40:34.582
<v Speaker 1>that whether you dress it up as not eating sugar

0:40:34.741 --> 0:40:38.862
<v Speaker 1>or all of these things, the underlying subtext is skinny.

0:40:39.062 --> 0:40:43.502
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's why I don't think it's possible to unscramble

0:40:44.181 --> 0:40:49.102
<v Speaker 3>someone sharing what they eat in a day, or sharing

0:40:49.181 --> 0:40:53.741
<v Speaker 3>their diet or whatever from being instructive. The instruction is

0:40:53.781 --> 0:40:57.701
<v Speaker 3>in the way your body looks, whether or not you.

0:40:57.181 --> 0:40:59.501
<v Speaker 1>Yes, So you're saying that Gwyneth's saying what she eats

0:40:59.661 --> 0:41:01.701
<v Speaker 1>is really just about us listening so that we can

0:41:01.741 --> 0:41:03.261
<v Speaker 1>eat like her, so we can look like her.

0:41:03.302 --> 0:41:05.262
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, And that's why I think the question is a trap.

0:41:05.382 --> 0:41:07.781
<v Speaker 3>And we've talked about it on this show before, and

0:41:07.781 --> 0:41:10.462
<v Speaker 3>in fact, we did a subscriber episode where we spoke

0:41:10.502 --> 0:41:12.221
<v Speaker 3>about that and we talked about down a plate and

0:41:12.261 --> 0:41:15.142
<v Speaker 3>I refused. I was like, I am not saying what

0:41:15.181 --> 0:41:19.142
<v Speaker 3>I ate because I'm presenting it as something whether I

0:41:19.181 --> 0:41:20.942
<v Speaker 3>want to or not, instructive when I don't think it

0:41:20.982 --> 0:41:21.542
<v Speaker 3>is instructing.

0:41:21.582 --> 0:41:25.741
<v Speaker 2>I think that's really sad because I love food and

0:41:25.862 --> 0:41:28.902
<v Speaker 2>I could talk about food for one hundred years. I

0:41:29.582 --> 0:41:31.862
<v Speaker 2>could out rest, and I don't like the I agree

0:41:31.902 --> 0:41:33.861
<v Speaker 2>very much with what you're both saying. This is very

0:41:33.862 --> 0:41:37.941
<v Speaker 2>complicated territory, but the idea that women can only talk

0:41:37.982 --> 0:41:40.462
<v Speaker 2>about food and it's about what they look like isn't true,

0:41:40.542 --> 0:41:42.461
<v Speaker 2>like lots of women get an enormous amount of joy

0:41:42.462 --> 0:41:45.022
<v Speaker 2>out of FID. I think you can comfort and guilt

0:41:45.142 --> 0:41:50.062
<v Speaker 2>and shame. But also what's interesting to me is, well,

0:41:50.102 --> 0:41:52.542
<v Speaker 2>you're definitely right me or about the fact that this

0:41:52.781 --> 0:41:55.582
<v Speaker 2>was the apex of diet culture. But the other piece

0:41:55.622 --> 0:41:58.422
<v Speaker 2>to this is that a lot of women who have

0:41:58.542 --> 0:42:03.062
<v Speaker 2>this complicated pleasure pain relationship with food, and most women

0:42:03.142 --> 0:42:05.381
<v Speaker 2>I know restrict what they in some way. I don't

0:42:05.382 --> 0:42:07.382
<v Speaker 2>mean in a serious way, but I mean in terms

0:42:07.382 --> 0:42:10.261
<v Speaker 2>of if I eat that cake now, eating that like

0:42:10.422 --> 0:42:12.901
<v Speaker 2>most women do, like they just do, and I quite

0:42:12.942 --> 0:42:14.301
<v Speaker 2>like it when they're honest about it. I feel a

0:42:14.302 --> 0:42:16.782
<v Speaker 2>little bit like that the way you do about botox,

0:42:17.062 --> 0:42:18.582
<v Speaker 2>Like tell me you've had it, don't tell me you

0:42:18.582 --> 0:42:21.942
<v Speaker 2>haven't had it. I can't bear it when tiny skinny

0:42:21.942 --> 0:42:24.102
<v Speaker 2>celebrities are like I hate burgers, I'm like, no, you don't.

0:42:24.142 --> 0:42:26.861
<v Speaker 1>Did you notice that in Megan's show that subtext of

0:42:26.902 --> 0:42:29.902
<v Speaker 1>diet culture where not necessarily from her, but sometimes and

0:42:29.942 --> 0:42:32.462
<v Speaker 1>from her guess there was often oh, we've been for

0:42:32.502 --> 0:42:35.221
<v Speaker 1>a hike, so we can have the cake, or I've

0:42:35.261 --> 0:42:36.582
<v Speaker 1>been good today so.

0:42:36.822 --> 0:42:38.861
<v Speaker 2>Well, And also they weren't saying that, but they were

0:42:38.862 --> 0:42:41.422
<v Speaker 2>eating a lot of carbs that you actually just know

0:42:41.741 --> 0:42:45.221
<v Speaker 2>if you know anything about this a la world, they

0:42:45.302 --> 0:42:48.102
<v Speaker 2>are not eating carbs, which is why this made headlines.

0:42:48.302 --> 0:42:50.902
<v Speaker 2>But the other piece of this, it isn't all about skinny.

0:42:50.942 --> 0:42:54.981
<v Speaker 2>It is partly about health too, because women, many many

0:42:55.022 --> 0:42:59.142
<v Speaker 2>women live with this kind of general feeling of ick right,

0:42:59.342 --> 0:43:02.542
<v Speaker 2>like something's not right, something's not right. If I ate better,

0:43:02.701 --> 0:43:05.742
<v Speaker 2>if I did this more. And some of that is true.

0:43:06.221 --> 0:43:08.582
<v Speaker 2>A lot of processed food is making a lot of

0:43:08.622 --> 0:43:11.981
<v Speaker 2>people very sick. If you eat more healthily, you will

0:43:12.022 --> 0:43:15.861
<v Speaker 2>probably feel better. Like like everything, there is truth to it,

0:43:16.422 --> 0:43:18.741
<v Speaker 2>but when it's dressed up as high status. And it

0:43:18.781 --> 0:43:22.022
<v Speaker 2>also let's not pretend that eating like this isn't incredibly expensive,

0:43:22.102 --> 0:43:24.982
<v Speaker 2>like organic everything, you know. I was listening to a

0:43:24.982 --> 0:43:27.381
<v Speaker 2>podcast recently where the hosts were talking about how they

0:43:27.382 --> 0:43:29.142
<v Speaker 2>were hooking each other up with a link to where

0:43:29.142 --> 0:43:31.861
<v Speaker 2>you could buy clean grains, and you're like, oh my god,

0:43:31.902 --> 0:43:36.661
<v Speaker 2>so even quen wa isn't healthy unless SENSI. Yeah, you

0:43:36.701 --> 0:43:40.741
<v Speaker 2>know this particular place like there's so much status in it,

0:43:40.822 --> 0:43:43.341
<v Speaker 2>and it is definitely tied up with skinny. But I

0:43:43.342 --> 0:43:46.181
<v Speaker 2>think one of the complicating factors is that health is

0:43:46.221 --> 0:43:49.461
<v Speaker 2>part of it too. Really bad overly processed, cheap food

0:43:49.502 --> 0:43:51.542
<v Speaker 2>full of chemicals is making people see.

0:43:51.422 --> 0:43:54.102
<v Speaker 3>But who hasn't had something lodged into their head that

0:43:54.142 --> 0:43:57.301
<v Speaker 3>a celebrity said fifteen years ago about food that has

0:43:57.342 --> 0:43:59.301
<v Speaker 3>nothing to do with health. It has everything to do

0:43:59.342 --> 0:44:01.982
<v Speaker 3>with weight. That has literally changed how you eat. Oh,

0:44:02.181 --> 0:44:04.661
<v Speaker 3>and I think there's you know, there's guidelines about how

0:44:04.661 --> 0:44:08.382
<v Speaker 3>we report in the media on weight eating disorders. You

0:44:08.462 --> 0:44:11.341
<v Speaker 3>never put someone And this happens all the time, and

0:44:11.382 --> 0:44:14.022
<v Speaker 3>I see it now all over Instagram, Like we should

0:44:14.062 --> 0:44:16.301
<v Speaker 3>not be talking about numbers on a scale, whether it's

0:44:16.302 --> 0:44:20.982
<v Speaker 3>about eating disorders or whatever, because it encourages copycat behavior.

0:44:21.181 --> 0:44:22.862
<v Speaker 3>And I think that all of this is only getting

0:44:22.862 --> 0:44:26.422
<v Speaker 3>worse because every time I log on to TikTok, I

0:44:26.462 --> 0:44:28.261
<v Speaker 3>get a what I eat in a day and I

0:44:28.302 --> 0:44:29.022
<v Speaker 3>look at it and I.

0:44:28.982 --> 0:44:32.261
<v Speaker 4>Go, you haven't eating disorder? Like this is an eating disorder.

0:44:31.942 --> 0:44:33.622
<v Speaker 1>Gressed up aspiration and content.

0:44:33.741 --> 0:44:34.622
<v Speaker 4>Yeap, exactly right.

0:44:35.142 --> 0:44:37.102
<v Speaker 2>A massive thank you out louders. That's all we have

0:44:37.181 --> 0:44:39.702
<v Speaker 2>time for today. Thank you for listening to our show,

0:44:39.741 --> 0:44:42.262
<v Speaker 2>and of course to our fabulous team for putting this together.

0:44:42.342 --> 0:44:45.582
<v Speaker 2>We are getting on a plane and going to Perth.

0:44:45.902 --> 0:44:47.862
<v Speaker 2>But we will still be back in your ears tomorrow

0:44:47.902 --> 0:44:48.821
<v Speaker 2>of course, and.

0:44:48.781 --> 0:44:50.821
<v Speaker 1>If you're looking for something else to listen to. On

0:44:50.942 --> 0:44:54.982
<v Speaker 1>yesterday's episode, Amelia and I talked all about the Kennedy

0:44:54.982 --> 0:44:59.702
<v Speaker 1>women and one of my personal obsessions Carolyn Beissett Kennedy,

0:45:00.102 --> 0:45:02.941
<v Speaker 1>who some say is the original influencer. Do you even

0:45:02.942 --> 0:45:04.261
<v Speaker 1>know who she's Jesse Oria.

0:45:04.102 --> 0:45:07.742
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, I went to the JFK Museum in Boston

0:45:07.862 --> 0:45:09.502
<v Speaker 3>and they had like some of her clothes.

0:45:09.781 --> 0:45:12.422
<v Speaker 1>Oh wow. A link, as always, will be in the

0:45:12.462 --> 0:45:14.262
<v Speaker 1>show notes. Bye bye.

0:45:15.502 --> 0:45:18.421
<v Speaker 3>Shout out to any Mum and mea subscribers listening. If

0:45:18.422 --> 0:45:20.421
<v Speaker 3>you love the show and you want to support us,

0:45:20.661 --> 0:45:23.462
<v Speaker 3>subscribing to Mom and Mia is the very best way

0:45:23.502 --> 0:45:26.062
<v Speaker 3>to do so. There's a link in the episode description.