1 00:00:10,705 --> 00:00:13,425 Speaker 1: You're listening to Amma Mia podcast. 2 00:00:13,945 --> 00:00:17,465 Speaker 2: Mamma Mia acknowledges the traditional owners of land and waters 3 00:00:17,505 --> 00:00:22,105 Speaker 2: that this podcast is recorded on Makeup is My Therapy. 4 00:00:22,305 --> 00:00:25,305 Speaker 2: I'm in love, I'm obsess and I don't even feel 5 00:00:25,385 --> 00:00:26,105 Speaker 2: jailty a body. 6 00:00:28,705 --> 00:00:30,465 Speaker 1: Hello, and welcome to you beauty. 7 00:00:30,505 --> 00:00:32,945 Speaker 3: This is the daily podcast for your Face. I'm Kelly 8 00:00:32,985 --> 00:00:35,505 Speaker 3: McCarran and welcome to the formula. 9 00:00:35,705 --> 00:00:38,625 Speaker 1: Every week. I well, actually, you know what, let's be real. 10 00:00:38,665 --> 00:00:42,065 Speaker 3: It's normally erin, but she's prepping to exit human out 11 00:00:42,105 --> 00:00:44,265 Speaker 3: of her body right now, so you're stuck with me. 12 00:00:44,825 --> 00:00:47,545 Speaker 3: We sit down with celebrities, experts, and some of the 13 00:00:47,585 --> 00:00:49,905 Speaker 3: biggest names in beauty and take a look at their 14 00:00:49,945 --> 00:00:54,105 Speaker 3: skincare routine, chat about trends and topics in the beauty industry. 15 00:00:54,865 --> 00:00:57,865 Speaker 3: And if you've ever been remotely interested in the wonderful 16 00:00:57,865 --> 00:01:01,545 Speaker 3: world of beauty, you've probably heard about brands like Glossier, Notorium, 17 00:01:01,705 --> 00:01:05,625 Speaker 3: Road Skin, Summer Fridays, and now Point of View by TikTok, Sensation, 18 00:01:05,745 --> 00:01:09,225 Speaker 3: Mikhayla Nighera. Now, all of these brands have several things 19 00:01:09,225 --> 00:01:13,185 Speaker 3: in common. They're founded by influencers, and they're very successful 20 00:01:13,305 --> 00:01:16,665 Speaker 3: and very viral, but not everyone thinks there's a place 21 00:01:16,665 --> 00:01:20,225 Speaker 3: for influencer backed skincare brands. Today, I'm joined by a 22 00:01:20,385 --> 00:01:23,225 Speaker 3: very well versed, clever woman in the industry with a 23 00:01:23,225 --> 00:01:27,025 Speaker 3: lot of pervy intel. Georgia South is one half of 24 00:01:27,065 --> 00:01:30,825 Speaker 3: the dynamic duo behind Skinterest, a Sydney based lab responsible 25 00:01:30,865 --> 00:01:32,385 Speaker 3: for formulating many of. 26 00:01:32,305 --> 00:01:33,425 Speaker 1: Your favorite products. 27 00:01:34,025 --> 00:01:36,785 Speaker 3: She knows about product formulation and how to launch to 28 00:01:36,825 --> 00:01:39,625 Speaker 3: market better than anyone else I know. So I couldn't 29 00:01:39,665 --> 00:01:41,945 Speaker 3: think of a better person to chat to about influencer 30 00:01:41,985 --> 00:01:43,145 Speaker 3: backed skincare brands. 31 00:01:43,585 --> 00:01:45,905 Speaker 2: You are such beautiful skill. 32 00:01:45,665 --> 00:01:51,945 Speaker 1: But how Georgia, thank you so much for joining me today. 33 00:01:52,265 --> 00:01:55,785 Speaker 3: We're going to chat about the category of influencers skincare 34 00:01:55,785 --> 00:01:58,905 Speaker 3: brands in general, using the newest kit on the block 35 00:01:59,025 --> 00:02:00,865 Speaker 3: point of view as our example. 36 00:02:01,105 --> 00:02:03,145 Speaker 2: Thank you so much for having me Keeli. I think 37 00:02:03,185 --> 00:02:05,745 Speaker 2: that you invited me instead of one of the scientists 38 00:02:05,745 --> 00:02:07,945 Speaker 2: because you know I'm more likely to say something spicy. 39 00:02:08,065 --> 00:02:11,425 Speaker 3: To be honest, No, I invited you instead of the 40 00:02:11,465 --> 00:02:16,625 Speaker 3: scientist because you are much more entertaining if you will, 41 00:02:18,105 --> 00:02:18,665 Speaker 3: no pressure. 42 00:02:18,865 --> 00:02:19,465 Speaker 2: No pressure. 43 00:02:19,665 --> 00:02:22,345 Speaker 3: But firstly, what is some of the commentary you've seen 44 00:02:22,425 --> 00:02:24,825 Speaker 3: on the internet about this and Why do you think 45 00:02:24,945 --> 00:02:27,705 Speaker 3: people love to hate because you put out a great 46 00:02:27,825 --> 00:02:31,465 Speaker 3: video actually looking at the brand, and you've got some 47 00:02:31,585 --> 00:02:34,625 Speaker 3: responses going oh blah blah blah, like it's just so silly. 48 00:02:34,665 --> 00:02:36,625 Speaker 3: So can you explain a little bit, Yeah. 49 00:02:36,425 --> 00:02:39,985 Speaker 2: Sure, I mean I think MICHAELA. Deguera is a polarizing 50 00:02:40,305 --> 00:02:43,145 Speaker 2: persona apparently, you know, people love to hate. I think 51 00:02:43,145 --> 00:02:45,425 Speaker 2: it's interesting that people seem to be a little bit 52 00:02:45,505 --> 00:02:49,745 Speaker 2: resentful towards content creators or influencers, and I think some 53 00:02:49,785 --> 00:02:51,865 Speaker 2: of it stems from the fact that people perceive that 54 00:02:51,865 --> 00:02:54,825 Speaker 2: they're making money, and often lots of money from something 55 00:02:54,825 --> 00:02:57,785 Speaker 2: that we perceive has not been very difficult, and sometimes 56 00:02:57,785 --> 00:03:00,385 Speaker 2: that doesn't sit well with people. I think it's unfair 57 00:03:00,465 --> 00:03:03,385 Speaker 2: because making content is hard. You know, even the couple 58 00:03:03,385 --> 00:03:06,665 Speaker 2: of videos I do for our business Instagram, there's a 59 00:03:06,665 --> 00:03:08,865 Speaker 2: lot of talent that it takes to be able to 60 00:03:08,905 --> 00:03:12,785 Speaker 2: write edit content. It all takes time and skill. So 61 00:03:12,825 --> 00:03:16,105 Speaker 2: I think we shouldn't negate that skill set that influencers have, 62 00:03:16,345 --> 00:03:18,905 Speaker 2: because you know, it's real and it exists. I think 63 00:03:18,945 --> 00:03:22,665 Speaker 2: also there's jealousy over what people perceive as the glamorous 64 00:03:22,705 --> 00:03:25,385 Speaker 2: side of it. You know, they see the freebies. They 65 00:03:25,425 --> 00:03:28,905 Speaker 2: see the events and the free products, and maybe that 66 00:03:28,945 --> 00:03:32,385 Speaker 2: all looks really appealing, but the reality is that your 67 00:03:32,425 --> 00:03:35,585 Speaker 2: mortgage can't be paid with serum and then free products 68 00:03:35,665 --> 00:03:38,625 Speaker 2: done by groceries, so they've still got to work. And 69 00:03:39,065 --> 00:03:41,465 Speaker 2: often that leads to them creating their own brands. 70 00:03:41,905 --> 00:03:45,065 Speaker 3: And I think, well, they see how much money they 71 00:03:45,065 --> 00:03:47,225 Speaker 3: can bring in for other brands, which is why the 72 00:03:47,265 --> 00:03:51,705 Speaker 3: brands are paying such huge amounts. Because everyone gets cranky 73 00:03:51,745 --> 00:03:53,905 Speaker 3: at influences for making so much money, but it's like 74 00:03:53,945 --> 00:03:55,865 Speaker 3: that brand is paying them that much money for a 75 00:03:55,905 --> 00:03:58,785 Speaker 3: reason because their return on investment is so much higher. 76 00:03:59,345 --> 00:04:00,785 Speaker 1: So I guess they sort of see all. 77 00:04:00,785 --> 00:04:02,385 Speaker 3: That, and after doing it for a few years, they're 78 00:04:02,425 --> 00:04:04,505 Speaker 3: kind of like, why am I not taking all of 79 00:04:04,545 --> 00:04:08,105 Speaker 3: the pie and creating something that I love every single 80 00:04:08,145 --> 00:04:10,345 Speaker 3: part of? And I think think that some of the 81 00:04:10,465 --> 00:04:14,545 Speaker 3: jealousy also comes from, you know, you do have to 82 00:04:14,585 --> 00:04:17,985 Speaker 3: have money to start a brand, so there's like that 83 00:04:18,105 --> 00:04:20,625 Speaker 3: as well, and all of a sudden, someone can a 84 00:04:20,625 --> 00:04:24,025 Speaker 3: lot easier than maybe someone that doesn't have a following 85 00:04:24,465 --> 00:04:25,625 Speaker 3: can start a brand. 86 00:04:25,585 --> 00:04:29,145 Speaker 2: One hundred percent. So influencers, content creators, celebrities, they have 87 00:04:29,185 --> 00:04:32,025 Speaker 2: a captive audience they have someone they're ready, willing and 88 00:04:32,065 --> 00:04:35,665 Speaker 2: waiting to buy a product that they're launching potentially, whereas 89 00:04:35,705 --> 00:04:37,945 Speaker 2: somebody not working in that area. They have to confine 90 00:04:37,985 --> 00:04:40,505 Speaker 2: their customers and that is going to take more time, 91 00:04:40,625 --> 00:04:44,265 Speaker 2: more money, and just be more difficult. The market. It's 92 00:04:44,305 --> 00:04:46,825 Speaker 2: such a different landscape than it was fifteen years ago. 93 00:04:47,305 --> 00:04:49,985 Speaker 2: You know, it's global now, it's more saturated for sure, 94 00:04:50,025 --> 00:04:53,265 Speaker 2: and it's more competitive, but also e commerce and social 95 00:04:53,305 --> 00:04:56,505 Speaker 2: media they've leveled the playing field so you have less 96 00:04:56,505 --> 00:05:00,825 Speaker 2: reliance on retailers expensive advertising and pr And I guess 97 00:05:00,865 --> 00:05:02,825 Speaker 2: what I mean by that is that fifteen years ago, 98 00:05:02,945 --> 00:05:05,225 Speaker 2: to be successful you probably have to be in a 99 00:05:05,265 --> 00:05:08,425 Speaker 2: bricks and more to retailer, right and they're taking a margin, 100 00:05:08,945 --> 00:05:11,665 Speaker 2: and you also need to order large amounts of product 101 00:05:11,665 --> 00:05:15,065 Speaker 2: to stock them. To get into those retailers. To make sales, 102 00:05:15,065 --> 00:05:18,825 Speaker 2: you have to obtain magazine or newspaper editorial coverage that 103 00:05:18,905 --> 00:05:21,905 Speaker 2: was usually done by expensive pr agencies. You had to 104 00:05:21,905 --> 00:05:23,945 Speaker 2: place print ads if you could afford it, and all 105 00:05:23,985 --> 00:05:27,505 Speaker 2: that ended up being cost prohibitive for most startups. Whereas 106 00:05:27,585 --> 00:05:30,625 Speaker 2: narrow you can import or white label a product potentially 107 00:05:30,665 --> 00:05:33,465 Speaker 2: at a low minimum order quantity. You can sell it 108 00:05:33,505 --> 00:05:36,465 Speaker 2: direct to consumers, so you're keeping all the profit. You've 109 00:05:36,465 --> 00:05:39,025 Speaker 2: cut out that margin from a retailer because it's your 110 00:05:39,065 --> 00:05:41,425 Speaker 2: own channels, and if you're lucky, you can go viral 111 00:05:41,505 --> 00:05:44,705 Speaker 2: through some user generated content or working with content creators. 112 00:05:45,025 --> 00:05:47,305 Speaker 2: So suddenly you can see that the barriers to entry 113 00:05:47,305 --> 00:05:49,825 Speaker 2: have become much lower and the category is more appealing 114 00:05:49,945 --> 00:05:51,465 Speaker 2: for somebody looking to make money. 115 00:05:51,825 --> 00:05:54,465 Speaker 3: What is the actual cost of making a beauty product? 116 00:05:54,465 --> 00:05:58,985 Speaker 3: Because Mikayla does have investors that would obviously be funding it, 117 00:05:59,345 --> 00:06:01,665 Speaker 3: but they wouldn't invest if they didn't believe in her 118 00:06:01,865 --> 00:06:04,505 Speaker 3: and what she was selling. So what sort of costs 119 00:06:04,505 --> 00:06:07,225 Speaker 3: are we looking at to launch a product range like 120 00:06:07,265 --> 00:06:08,025 Speaker 3: what she's done. 121 00:06:08,225 --> 00:06:10,985 Speaker 2: Product costs, they're really it's too variable to list, and 122 00:06:11,065 --> 00:06:14,545 Speaker 2: there's really significant upfront costs for a brand though. So 123 00:06:14,745 --> 00:06:18,265 Speaker 2: for Mikayla, she had five SKUs or different products. If 124 00:06:18,305 --> 00:06:21,345 Speaker 2: her manufacturer had a minimum order quantity of say ten 125 00:06:21,425 --> 00:06:26,065 Speaker 2: thousand units, that's fifty thousand units in total. So let's 126 00:06:26,145 --> 00:06:29,225 Speaker 2: use three dollars per unit as an example, and I'm 127 00:06:29,225 --> 00:06:31,145 Speaker 2: going to use that as a guestimate. Based on her 128 00:06:31,145 --> 00:06:34,465 Speaker 2: retail price, that's suddenly one hundred and fifty thousand dollars 129 00:06:34,505 --> 00:06:37,065 Speaker 2: that had to be outlaid on the product before you've 130 00:06:37,105 --> 00:06:40,225 Speaker 2: even earned a single dollar. And those fifty thousand units 131 00:06:40,225 --> 00:06:42,105 Speaker 2: also have to be shipped, they have to be stored. 132 00:06:42,305 --> 00:06:45,185 Speaker 2: You know, that's a really considerable upfront cost with no 133 00:06:45,305 --> 00:06:47,025 Speaker 2: guarantee of how the products are going to sell. 134 00:06:47,465 --> 00:06:51,905 Speaker 3: And I actually bet that her upfront order quantities would 135 00:06:51,905 --> 00:06:54,825 Speaker 3: have been a lot higher given her. 136 00:06:54,705 --> 00:06:58,105 Speaker 2: Following potentially, and that's you know, her following is what 137 00:06:58,225 --> 00:07:01,945 Speaker 2: she's bringing to the table. Yeah, these investors in the 138 00:07:01,985 --> 00:07:05,225 Speaker 2: case for Michayla and who's supporting her, what they're bringing 139 00:07:05,265 --> 00:07:08,105 Speaker 2: to the table is their expertise and also their ability 140 00:07:08,145 --> 00:07:11,265 Speaker 2: to better optimize and leverage supply chain and other factors. 141 00:07:11,505 --> 00:07:14,345 Speaker 2: So they've got a stable of brands and other products 142 00:07:14,425 --> 00:07:17,905 Speaker 2: so they can deliver cross savings that are economies of scale, 143 00:07:17,945 --> 00:07:20,665 Speaker 2: all those kinds of things, which is mutually beneficial for 144 00:07:20,745 --> 00:07:23,385 Speaker 2: both parties. So having a following, yeah, it helps with 145 00:07:23,425 --> 00:07:25,785 Speaker 2: awareness and gives you a captive audience, but it doesn't 146 00:07:25,785 --> 00:07:28,785 Speaker 2: eliminate the need for RD and managing other aspects of 147 00:07:28,825 --> 00:07:31,705 Speaker 2: business operations, which is where these backers will assist. 148 00:07:39,785 --> 00:07:43,105 Speaker 3: So I think that what a lot of people playing 149 00:07:43,105 --> 00:07:46,385 Speaker 3: along at home don't realize is that some influencer backed 150 00:07:46,425 --> 00:07:47,265 Speaker 3: skincare lines. 151 00:07:47,305 --> 00:07:49,185 Speaker 1: Are you mentioned earlier? White label? 152 00:07:49,505 --> 00:07:52,025 Speaker 3: Can you please explain what white label actually is and 153 00:07:52,065 --> 00:07:54,905 Speaker 3: how an influencer would go about launching a white label brand? 154 00:07:55,345 --> 00:07:59,545 Speaker 2: Yeah? Sure, so, white label, private label, off the shelf, turnkey. 155 00:07:59,705 --> 00:08:02,385 Speaker 2: There are all sort of terms that get used interchangeably, 156 00:08:02,545 --> 00:08:04,665 Speaker 2: and the definition between each of them is sort of 157 00:08:05,025 --> 00:08:07,825 Speaker 2: slowly dissolved and they've kind of merged into one concept. 158 00:08:08,185 --> 00:08:10,505 Speaker 2: But traditionally, private label is when you work with a 159 00:08:10,505 --> 00:08:13,665 Speaker 2: manufacturer on and off the shelf kind of formula, so 160 00:08:13,705 --> 00:08:16,185 Speaker 2: you don't pay for the development and it's absorbed into 161 00:08:16,225 --> 00:08:18,865 Speaker 2: the production cost. So what it means is that your 162 00:08:18,865 --> 00:08:23,945 Speaker 2: product is likely not entirely unique white labeling. It's more 163 00:08:24,065 --> 00:08:27,225 Speaker 2: like renting an existing formula from the manufacturer, so it's 164 00:08:27,465 --> 00:08:30,545 Speaker 2: very likely similar or identical to a product already in 165 00:08:30,545 --> 00:08:34,185 Speaker 2: the market under a different brand. White label's really common 166 00:08:34,225 --> 00:08:37,585 Speaker 2: for sunscreens because they're more expensive to develop and time 167 00:08:37,625 --> 00:08:40,385 Speaker 2: consuming to bring to market. So it's also common for 168 00:08:40,465 --> 00:08:43,945 Speaker 2: retailers that have home brands something like baked beans even 169 00:08:44,025 --> 00:08:47,545 Speaker 2: or sunscreen. It can be the same core product ingredient 170 00:08:47,665 --> 00:08:52,425 Speaker 2: coming out of the factory and put into brand ABC packaging. 171 00:08:52,465 --> 00:08:54,425 Speaker 3: Which is why sometimes there could be such a big 172 00:08:54,465 --> 00:08:58,825 Speaker 3: price discrepancy between two products that are basically the same thing. 173 00:08:58,865 --> 00:09:00,025 Speaker 1: They're just in different packets. 174 00:09:00,385 --> 00:09:01,985 Speaker 2: That's right, And it's up to the brand how much 175 00:09:02,065 --> 00:09:04,705 Speaker 2: exactly they want to add to cover their other costs 176 00:09:04,745 --> 00:09:07,145 Speaker 2: like marketing or the other costs that are outside of 177 00:09:07,145 --> 00:09:10,745 Speaker 2: the actual product. And there's nothing wrong with this. I'm 178 00:09:10,745 --> 00:09:13,025 Speaker 2: not in any way saying that white or private label 179 00:09:13,105 --> 00:09:17,025 Speaker 2: products are inferior, not at all, because the reality is 180 00:09:17,065 --> 00:09:19,425 Speaker 2: most brands don't have an in house chemist or an 181 00:09:19,505 --> 00:09:22,305 Speaker 2: in house lab, so they're relying on working with a 182 00:09:22,305 --> 00:09:25,585 Speaker 2: manufacturer because it's the fastest and lowest risk way to 183 00:09:25,665 --> 00:09:28,265 Speaker 2: launch a product, although longer term it can actually end 184 00:09:28,345 --> 00:09:31,945 Speaker 2: up more expensive, but the cash required to start is less. 185 00:09:32,345 --> 00:09:35,345 Speaker 2: The other thing is that trends move so quickly nowadays. 186 00:09:35,625 --> 00:09:38,465 Speaker 2: Everyone wants to go viral, so speed to market is 187 00:09:38,785 --> 00:09:43,345 Speaker 2: so important that good manufacturers identify trends, capitalize them, and 188 00:09:43,385 --> 00:09:44,985 Speaker 2: then sell them to multiple parties. 189 00:09:45,585 --> 00:09:48,665 Speaker 3: Yeah, and I think though as well, would it be 190 00:09:48,785 --> 00:09:52,345 Speaker 3: right to say that, of course, there's nothing wrong with it, 191 00:09:52,385 --> 00:09:55,425 Speaker 3: but it's probably not a ground breaking product or something 192 00:09:55,425 --> 00:09:58,465 Speaker 3: that's going to change your life, because otherwise whoever formulate 193 00:09:58,505 --> 00:10:01,545 Speaker 3: it originally would have trademarked it or patent or whatever 194 00:10:01,705 --> 00:10:02,505 Speaker 3: the terms would be. 195 00:10:02,745 --> 00:10:06,065 Speaker 2: Yeah, look, it's likely true R and D and innovation 196 00:10:06,305 --> 00:10:09,385 Speaker 2: and experimentation. It can be really expensive, it can be time, 197 00:10:09,425 --> 00:10:13,185 Speaker 2: can assuming, and it's also risky because there's no guaranteed outcome. 198 00:10:13,465 --> 00:10:16,625 Speaker 2: So you can understand why brands would take the easier path, 199 00:10:17,185 --> 00:10:18,905 Speaker 2: but the risk is that you end up with a 200 00:10:18,945 --> 00:10:21,505 Speaker 2: ce of me too products that are really similar and 201 00:10:21,505 --> 00:10:25,025 Speaker 2: there's not much of differentiation. And you know, it's not 202 00:10:25,065 --> 00:10:28,305 Speaker 2: also just influencers that do this, there's HETEs of successful 203 00:10:28,345 --> 00:10:30,665 Speaker 2: brands that don't know in their own formulas. So your 204 00:10:30,705 --> 00:10:33,225 Speaker 2: favorite product is actually at the mercy of a manufacturer 205 00:10:33,225 --> 00:10:35,825 Speaker 2: and it can be discontinued at any point. And that's 206 00:10:35,865 --> 00:10:38,385 Speaker 2: the real risk for a brand operating in this way, 207 00:10:38,465 --> 00:10:40,185 Speaker 2: that you know, someone else can pull the plug on 208 00:10:40,225 --> 00:10:41,065 Speaker 2: your product. 209 00:10:41,545 --> 00:10:44,105 Speaker 3: And you could be losing a lot of money. With 210 00:10:44,545 --> 00:10:47,705 Speaker 3: Mikayla's brand, with point of view, when you look at it, 211 00:10:47,745 --> 00:10:49,865 Speaker 3: would you say that she has done the R and 212 00:10:49,945 --> 00:10:52,745 Speaker 3: D and formulated herself well, not herself in her kitchen, 213 00:10:52,745 --> 00:10:54,705 Speaker 3: but like with a team of chemists. 214 00:10:55,065 --> 00:10:57,105 Speaker 2: Yeah, so it appears that she worked with a team 215 00:10:57,145 --> 00:10:59,625 Speaker 2: in Korea and with a Korean manufacturer, so it was 216 00:10:59,665 --> 00:11:03,265 Speaker 2: developed and made in career. From the research that we 217 00:11:03,345 --> 00:11:06,345 Speaker 2: conducted looking at the products when they released, we don't 218 00:11:06,505 --> 00:11:10,945 Speaker 2: think that there's similar enough products in the market that 219 00:11:11,025 --> 00:11:13,105 Speaker 2: it would be white or private label. We do think 220 00:11:13,105 --> 00:11:14,465 Speaker 2: they're custom formulations. 221 00:11:14,625 --> 00:11:18,345 Speaker 3: I also think that the investor that they got, it's 222 00:11:18,345 --> 00:11:22,265 Speaker 3: a huge investor that only invests in pretty successful companies, 223 00:11:22,345 --> 00:11:24,585 Speaker 3: so I don't think that they would have invested in 224 00:11:24,625 --> 00:11:25,945 Speaker 3: a white label business. 225 00:11:26,265 --> 00:11:29,025 Speaker 2: They're also involved with browns like West Mainitilia. 226 00:11:29,345 --> 00:11:31,505 Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, that huge, huge. 227 00:11:31,345 --> 00:11:33,905 Speaker 2: Really impressive stable of brands. They obviously know what they're doing. 228 00:11:34,505 --> 00:11:37,705 Speaker 3: So when someone says that they're formulating a product. So 229 00:11:37,785 --> 00:11:40,465 Speaker 3: let's just say someone comes out and I actually don't 230 00:11:40,465 --> 00:11:42,545 Speaker 3: mean MICHAELA because I don't think she said this at all, 231 00:11:42,585 --> 00:11:44,945 Speaker 3: but say an influencer comes out and they go, oh, 232 00:11:45,065 --> 00:11:48,265 Speaker 3: this product's been fifteen years in the making, I've been 233 00:11:48,305 --> 00:11:49,785 Speaker 3: developing for so long. 234 00:11:50,345 --> 00:11:53,545 Speaker 1: Why is that actually silly to say? 235 00:11:53,745 --> 00:11:56,585 Speaker 3: Like, why should we not trust that if an influencer 236 00:11:56,625 --> 00:11:57,985 Speaker 3: says it or celebrity? 237 00:11:58,145 --> 00:11:58,985 Speaker 2: Okay, good question. 238 00:11:59,705 --> 00:12:02,785 Speaker 1: I think Bill the TG Yeah, I. 239 00:12:02,705 --> 00:12:04,585 Speaker 2: Don't want to yack anyone's young, and I don't want 240 00:12:04,585 --> 00:12:07,985 Speaker 2: to take away from any Brown founders and their stories. However, 241 00:12:08,385 --> 00:12:11,185 Speaker 2: I will say that other than some that's really innovative, 242 00:12:11,425 --> 00:12:14,545 Speaker 2: or you're creating from scratch, patenting an ingredient, for example, 243 00:12:14,625 --> 00:12:19,305 Speaker 2: with a prolonged experimentation phase, five years is pretty unusual. 244 00:12:19,465 --> 00:12:21,745 Speaker 2: If it took you five years to formulate I don't know, 245 00:12:21,825 --> 00:12:25,825 Speaker 2: say cleanser, even a sunscreen, there's an issue somewhere along 246 00:12:25,825 --> 00:12:29,945 Speaker 2: the path. It's likely that your brief isn't thorough or 247 00:12:29,985 --> 00:12:32,745 Speaker 2: well thought out, or you've got a communication issue with 248 00:12:32,785 --> 00:12:35,745 Speaker 2: your formulator. Another big thing is that maybe you're not 249 00:12:35,785 --> 00:12:38,665 Speaker 2: being realistic with your expectations, and that should have been 250 00:12:38,705 --> 00:12:41,185 Speaker 2: managed earlier on in the process by your chemist. So 251 00:12:41,665 --> 00:12:43,985 Speaker 2: what I mean by that is somebody who may say 252 00:12:43,985 --> 00:12:46,945 Speaker 2: they want a minimal only SPF fifty, but they don't 253 00:12:46,945 --> 00:12:48,985 Speaker 2: want it tinted, but they don't want any white cast, 254 00:12:49,065 --> 00:12:50,425 Speaker 2: and they want it to be really fluid, but they 255 00:12:50,425 --> 00:12:53,225 Speaker 2: don't want any oil or water. You might be chasing 256 00:12:53,225 --> 00:12:55,345 Speaker 2: a unicorn and that might be what you do for 257 00:12:55,385 --> 00:12:57,105 Speaker 2: five years. It shouldn't be that long. 258 00:12:57,665 --> 00:13:00,425 Speaker 3: Yeah, So it's not like you just worked so hard 259 00:13:00,425 --> 00:13:02,425 Speaker 3: on it for five years that that's why it took 260 00:13:02,465 --> 00:13:04,785 Speaker 3: so long. It's actually just that you had no idea 261 00:13:04,785 --> 00:13:07,745 Speaker 3: what you were doing your maybe I said it, you 262 00:13:07,785 --> 00:13:11,745 Speaker 3: did it, okay? So can we talk about POV as 263 00:13:11,745 --> 00:13:16,185 Speaker 3: an example of when an influencer launches their range and 264 00:13:16,625 --> 00:13:19,465 Speaker 3: all of a sudden it sells out in thirty seconds 265 00:13:19,585 --> 00:13:22,945 Speaker 3: or whatnot. Do you think that they actually sell out 266 00:13:23,065 --> 00:13:25,185 Speaker 3: or do you think it's like a marketing technique because 267 00:13:25,225 --> 00:13:28,465 Speaker 3: if they actually sold out, how long would it take 268 00:13:28,585 --> 00:13:31,705 Speaker 3: to get the product realistically back on the shelves. 269 00:13:32,145 --> 00:13:35,585 Speaker 2: So scarcity marketing, it creates a sense of urgency. 270 00:13:36,065 --> 00:13:37,665 Speaker 1: It works, it doesn't wurk. 271 00:13:37,705 --> 00:13:38,785 Speaker 2: I wanted to buy it as well. 272 00:13:38,825 --> 00:13:41,585 Speaker 3: You and I are both massive victims to someone going 273 00:13:41,625 --> 00:13:43,905 Speaker 3: it's going live at two pm or two am, waking 274 00:13:43,985 --> 00:13:47,105 Speaker 3: up at that time, checking like you're going to get 275 00:13:47,145 --> 00:13:49,585 Speaker 3: your hands on it eventually. It's not going to just 276 00:13:49,625 --> 00:13:51,865 Speaker 3: sell out forever. So it's funny that we all fall 277 00:13:51,985 --> 00:13:54,865 Speaker 3: victim to that. Oh no, there's only a certain amount. 278 00:13:55,265 --> 00:13:57,985 Speaker 2: Absolutely my backgrounds in marketing, I'm a marketer. I know 279 00:13:58,025 --> 00:14:00,185 Speaker 2: what it is, Sam, Yet I still had four goes 280 00:14:00,225 --> 00:14:03,145 Speaker 2: at getting the Yes style advent calendar until I got 281 00:14:03,185 --> 00:14:05,665 Speaker 2: my Yes, I've got it right, so it works. There's 282 00:14:05,665 --> 00:14:09,625 Speaker 2: also a perceived prestige in owning something that's scarce, which 283 00:14:09,825 --> 00:14:12,945 Speaker 2: I think marketers leverage. The reality is that they are 284 00:14:13,065 --> 00:14:16,865 Speaker 2: probably holding some stock back, and it's a really fine 285 00:14:16,905 --> 00:14:19,945 Speaker 2: line that you've got to walk about the supply and 286 00:14:20,225 --> 00:14:23,345 Speaker 2: selling out concept, because if you're not a celebrity where 287 00:14:23,345 --> 00:14:25,185 Speaker 2: your customers are going to wait for the next job, 288 00:14:25,705 --> 00:14:28,185 Speaker 2: and you've got too much financial liability for stock that 289 00:14:28,345 --> 00:14:32,385 Speaker 2: essentially becomes a ticking time bomb towards expiring once it's 290 00:14:32,385 --> 00:14:35,545 Speaker 2: been made, you can put yourself in a really vulnerable position. 291 00:14:36,105 --> 00:14:38,865 Speaker 2: So it's a real balancing act. And higher order has 292 00:14:38,905 --> 00:14:41,865 Speaker 2: been lower unit prices, so people would generally order as 293 00:14:41,945 --> 00:14:45,825 Speaker 2: high as they comfortably forecast being able to sell. There's 294 00:14:45,825 --> 00:14:47,905 Speaker 2: also time that has to be considered in terms of 295 00:14:47,945 --> 00:14:51,745 Speaker 2: your manufacturer having to order ingredients and then schedule your production. 296 00:14:52,025 --> 00:14:55,585 Speaker 2: So I would say it's extremely unlikely that she hadn't 297 00:14:55,585 --> 00:14:58,505 Speaker 2: placed her next order at the time of launch. I 298 00:14:58,505 --> 00:15:01,305 Speaker 2: would say there's more products sitting in a warehouse somewhere 299 00:15:01,305 --> 00:15:04,465 Speaker 2: that will be strategically dropped over the coming weeks or months. 300 00:15:04,825 --> 00:15:07,825 Speaker 2: Because if you're placing an order with your manufacturer today, 301 00:15:08,465 --> 00:15:11,705 Speaker 2: it could be anywhere between three and six months until 302 00:15:11,705 --> 00:15:13,505 Speaker 2: you get the production line. 303 00:15:13,625 --> 00:15:15,745 Speaker 3: That's what I thought, So I always think I'm like, 304 00:15:15,785 --> 00:15:18,105 Speaker 3: there's no way they're too smart. 305 00:15:18,385 --> 00:15:21,545 Speaker 2: You would think so because it's missed opportunity. In Australia, 306 00:15:21,585 --> 00:15:24,185 Speaker 2: most ingredients are imported as well, so you've got that 307 00:15:24,225 --> 00:15:27,945 Speaker 2: delay too. And the reality is most people just wouldn't 308 00:15:27,945 --> 00:15:29,625 Speaker 2: want to miss out on the sales. But on the 309 00:15:29,665 --> 00:15:32,705 Speaker 2: flip side, there's probably people that didn't forecast the success 310 00:15:32,745 --> 00:15:35,505 Speaker 2: they had. They might have had a really great editorial 311 00:15:35,585 --> 00:15:38,385 Speaker 2: coverage and they didn't forecast that level of sales and 312 00:15:38,425 --> 00:15:41,265 Speaker 2: they actually do genuinely sell out and then they're just 313 00:15:41,305 --> 00:15:44,585 Speaker 2: missing opportunities for the next month or two until they 314 00:15:44,585 --> 00:15:47,385 Speaker 2: can get product back in stock. But the risk is 315 00:15:47,425 --> 00:15:49,385 Speaker 2: that by that point the hype has faded. 316 00:15:56,905 --> 00:16:00,465 Speaker 3: Purely, like if you look at the formulas, what celebrity 317 00:16:00,505 --> 00:16:04,345 Speaker 3: brands do you think are actually worth the hype celebrity 318 00:16:04,345 --> 00:16:05,225 Speaker 3: slash influencer. 319 00:16:05,425 --> 00:16:07,905 Speaker 2: It's tricky to say because an ingredient list isn't the 320 00:16:07,945 --> 00:16:10,625 Speaker 2: same as a formula, so it's really hard to judge 321 00:16:10,625 --> 00:16:14,425 Speaker 2: without actually physically trying the products. And also I think 322 00:16:14,465 --> 00:16:16,945 Speaker 2: another point here is that the line between celebrity and 323 00:16:16,985 --> 00:16:20,945 Speaker 2: influencer brands becomes a bit blurred because brand owners are 324 00:16:20,945 --> 00:16:23,585 Speaker 2: expected to step up on social media, and then you 325 00:16:23,705 --> 00:16:25,905 Speaker 2: kind of move to an interesting point where the founder 326 00:16:25,945 --> 00:16:29,625 Speaker 2: becomes the celebrity after they've already launched the brand. And 327 00:16:29,705 --> 00:16:33,785 Speaker 2: then what can often happen is the brand will continue 328 00:16:33,825 --> 00:16:38,105 Speaker 2: developing beyond the founder and beyond that celebrity and become 329 00:16:38,305 --> 00:16:41,225 Speaker 2: famous for itself. So something like Glossier, I bet there's 330 00:16:41,225 --> 00:16:43,385 Speaker 2: a ton of product users that don't actually know the 331 00:16:43,425 --> 00:16:46,905 Speaker 2: founder's story, and they'll continue to step back as time 332 00:16:46,945 --> 00:16:49,385 Speaker 2: goes on, let the brand stand for itself. And that's 333 00:16:49,425 --> 00:16:52,225 Speaker 2: usually at the point they'll sell out. They'll either sell 334 00:16:52,265 --> 00:16:54,785 Speaker 2: the company to a large conglomerate and make your killing, 335 00:16:54,865 --> 00:16:57,065 Speaker 2: or they'll sell a share of the company so that 336 00:16:57,105 --> 00:16:58,385 Speaker 2: they can step away. 337 00:16:58,345 --> 00:17:00,585 Speaker 3: Which is why it's very smart not to tie your 338 00:17:00,665 --> 00:17:04,665 Speaker 3: name in sometimes to the like call it who to 339 00:17:04,745 --> 00:17:07,625 Speaker 3: beauty say, I mean, she's an incredible such a smart 340 00:17:07,625 --> 00:17:09,585 Speaker 3: business woman, but it will be very hard for her 341 00:17:09,745 --> 00:17:11,025 Speaker 3: not to be involved in the business. 342 00:17:11,345 --> 00:17:14,585 Speaker 2: Yep. Absolutely, you do limit yourself, but you know there's 343 00:17:14,625 --> 00:17:18,385 Speaker 2: other people that become famous following the success of their brands. 344 00:17:18,225 --> 00:17:21,225 Speaker 1: Exactly, like Violet from Violet fr. 345 00:17:21,505 --> 00:17:24,745 Speaker 2: Or Natasha Denona or somebody like that who didn't really 346 00:17:24,785 --> 00:17:28,865 Speaker 2: have such at least an international following Charlotte Tilbury. 347 00:17:29,025 --> 00:17:31,745 Speaker 3: I didn't know of her before. I mean, she was 348 00:17:31,745 --> 00:17:34,905 Speaker 3: big in the UK, but she was not international. 349 00:17:34,425 --> 00:17:37,105 Speaker 2: And now she's a household name exactly. And then you've 350 00:17:37,105 --> 00:17:40,225 Speaker 2: also got brands that leverage the opportunities that content creators 351 00:17:40,225 --> 00:17:43,505 Speaker 2: and influencers bring to the table, like TBH partnering with 352 00:17:43,545 --> 00:17:45,905 Speaker 2: Hannah English, who's not just a content creator but also 353 00:17:45,945 --> 00:17:50,425 Speaker 2: a scientist cosmetic chemist. So brands can leverage influencers without 354 00:17:50,545 --> 00:17:53,905 Speaker 2: I guess hanging their hat entirely on that as a strategy. 355 00:17:54,065 --> 00:17:55,345 Speaker 1: That is a very good point. 356 00:17:56,105 --> 00:18:00,065 Speaker 3: Finally, what is a skincare technique or ingredient that you 357 00:18:00,185 --> 00:18:02,345 Speaker 3: personally love and what's something that you hate? 358 00:18:02,545 --> 00:18:05,065 Speaker 2: Oh, this is a spicy m The first thing that 359 00:18:05,145 --> 00:18:06,985 Speaker 2: spung to mind is a treatment, and I would say 360 00:18:07,025 --> 00:18:12,105 Speaker 2: filler because I feel like often people worse rather than better, 361 00:18:12,225 --> 00:18:14,625 Speaker 2: and I think it can be really aging. But in 362 00:18:14,705 --> 00:18:18,585 Speaker 2: terms of ingredients I reckon, I'd say Bacucci oil. I 363 00:18:18,625 --> 00:18:20,665 Speaker 2: think I'm a little bit over it. It seems to 364 00:18:20,705 --> 00:18:23,745 Speaker 2: be everywhere at the moment. I think the direct comparisons 365 00:18:23,745 --> 00:18:28,025 Speaker 2: to retinoids in terms of is ridiculous. They're overstated, and 366 00:18:28,065 --> 00:18:31,625 Speaker 2: there aren't the same long term studies available. Like, you know, 367 00:18:31,705 --> 00:18:34,545 Speaker 2: it's an alternative to retinoids in the same way that 368 00:18:34,585 --> 00:18:38,705 Speaker 2: broccoli is an alternative to chocolate, right, Not really. I've 369 00:18:38,705 --> 00:18:41,985 Speaker 2: also read some articles outlining the concern around sourcing and 370 00:18:42,025 --> 00:18:44,745 Speaker 2: sustainability of it due to its heightened demand that's causing 371 00:18:44,825 --> 00:18:47,945 Speaker 2: environmental strain. So for something that's kind of pitched as 372 00:18:47,945 --> 00:18:51,665 Speaker 2: a natural and greener alternative, it's kind of not that 373 00:18:51,785 --> 00:18:52,265 Speaker 2: clear cut. 374 00:18:52,865 --> 00:18:56,185 Speaker 3: Yeah, oh, that's such an interesting point about the environment, because, yeah, 375 00:18:56,225 --> 00:18:58,385 Speaker 3: the brands really love to green wash the shit out 376 00:18:58,425 --> 00:18:58,865 Speaker 3: of it. 377 00:18:58,865 --> 00:19:03,465 Speaker 2: It happened in a similar way with palm free alternatives. Yeah, 378 00:19:03,505 --> 00:19:06,105 Speaker 2: it's just not that simple, unfortunately, when you're looking at 379 00:19:06,105 --> 00:19:08,305 Speaker 2: something like a global supply chain of an ingredient. 380 00:19:08,465 --> 00:19:12,625 Speaker 1: But what's something you love? You hate bakuccio, I'm over it, 381 00:19:12,985 --> 00:19:13,305 Speaker 1: you know what. 382 00:19:13,385 --> 00:19:14,945 Speaker 2: It doesn't have to be fat, it doesn't have to 383 00:19:14,945 --> 00:19:17,185 Speaker 2: be new, it doesn't have to be fandangled. My skin 384 00:19:17,225 --> 00:19:21,505 Speaker 2: really likes glycerin. My skin responds well to that. Embarrier support. 385 00:19:21,745 --> 00:19:24,905 Speaker 2: I think when you're looking at ingredients, anything that's tried 386 00:19:25,025 --> 00:19:29,185 Speaker 2: to trusted, that's got clinical studies, any kind of data 387 00:19:29,385 --> 00:19:32,505 Speaker 2: that actually backs up its performance and it's being used 388 00:19:32,545 --> 00:19:35,505 Speaker 2: at the recommended amount and it's not just a tipping ingredient. 389 00:19:35,945 --> 00:19:36,785 Speaker 2: That's your best bet. 390 00:19:37,025 --> 00:19:39,265 Speaker 3: I love that, and that is such a good SoundBite 391 00:19:39,265 --> 00:19:41,745 Speaker 3: for people because it's like, you know you see things 392 00:19:41,785 --> 00:19:45,505 Speaker 3: glistered free. Well you've heard it here first. Don't be 393 00:19:45,505 --> 00:19:48,625 Speaker 3: afraid of glycerin. I love glitcer and personally and. 394 00:19:48,545 --> 00:19:50,905 Speaker 2: It's so personal, right, No two people's skin is the same, 395 00:19:50,905 --> 00:19:53,385 Speaker 2: which is why we have such a myriad of brands 396 00:19:53,425 --> 00:19:54,945 Speaker 2: and products exactly. 397 00:19:55,545 --> 00:19:57,345 Speaker 3: Well, that's all the time that we have for today. 398 00:19:57,425 --> 00:20:00,265 Speaker 3: Thank you so much to Georgia for joining us on 399 00:20:00,465 --> 00:20:03,465 Speaker 3: You Beauty. If you enjoyed this podcast, don't forget to 400 00:20:03,505 --> 00:20:07,465 Speaker 3: subscribe to our Beauty newsletter for more skincare tips, product recommendations, 401 00:20:07,465 --> 00:20:11,905 Speaker 3: and exclusive content delivered straight to your inbox. You Beauty 402 00:20:11,945 --> 00:20:15,185 Speaker 3: is produced by Steph McPhee and Lee Stamps, with audio 403 00:20:15,225 --> 00:20:18,265 Speaker 3: production by Tiagan Sudler. Thanks for listening, try and test. 404 00:20:18,305 --> 00:20:19,625 Speaker 3: It will be in your ears tomorrow