WEBVTT - "Take That Down." A Very Inconvenient Interview

0:00:10.327 --> 0:00:13.047
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to Amma Mia podcast.

0:00:13.727 --> 0:00:16.767
<v Speaker 2>Mamma Mia acknowledges the traditional owners of land and waters

0:00:16.807 --> 0:00:23.527
<v Speaker 2>that this podcast is recorded on Hello and welcome to

0:00:23.567 --> 0:00:24.047
<v Speaker 2>Mamma Mia.

0:00:24.127 --> 0:00:24.527
<v Speaker 3>Out loud.

0:00:24.607 --> 0:00:27.287
<v Speaker 2>What women are actually talking about on Monday, the twenty

0:00:27.327 --> 0:00:30.087
<v Speaker 2>third of September. I'm Holly Wainwright, I'm.

0:00:29.887 --> 0:00:31.807
<v Speaker 3>Mea Friedman, and I'm Jesse Stevens.

0:00:31.847 --> 0:00:34.687
<v Speaker 2>And on the show today, the former First Lady of

0:00:34.727 --> 0:00:38.607
<v Speaker 2>America is defending her right to express herself through nudity,

0:00:39.087 --> 0:00:43.727
<v Speaker 2>which is ace, but defending herself from whom. Also, there's

0:00:43.767 --> 0:00:46.207
<v Speaker 2>a surge in breast surgery among young women, but it's

0:00:46.207 --> 0:00:49.007
<v Speaker 2>breast reductions, not enlargements that are on the rise.

0:00:49.407 --> 0:00:51.247
<v Speaker 1>Why is that also?

0:00:51.607 --> 0:00:55.127
<v Speaker 2>Take it down? One of the biggest celebrity media brands

0:00:55.167 --> 0:00:58.247
<v Speaker 2>just bowed to pressure to remove a video interview with

0:00:58.287 --> 0:01:01.447
<v Speaker 2>a very famous actress, but first Jesse.

0:01:01.967 --> 0:01:06.807
<v Speaker 4>Last week, thousands of pages and other wireless devices simultaneously

0:01:07.087 --> 0:01:11.327
<v Speaker 4>exploded across Lebanon and part of Steria. It began on

0:01:11.407 --> 0:01:16.327
<v Speaker 4>Tuesday as thousands of handheld electronic pages, which had been

0:01:16.367 --> 0:01:20.847
<v Speaker 4>distributed by Hesbela, exploded on busy streets. To back up

0:01:20.847 --> 0:01:24.367
<v Speaker 4>for a moment, Hesbela is a designated terrorist organization, and

0:01:24.407 --> 0:01:28.127
<v Speaker 4>they control the most powerful armed force in Lebanon. The

0:01:28.167 --> 0:01:33.287
<v Speaker 4>assault continued Wednesday, with more devices detonating, including two way radios.

0:01:34.087 --> 0:01:37.087
<v Speaker 4>As the Washington Post put it, the attack was unlike

0:01:37.207 --> 0:01:41.527
<v Speaker 4>any other in size and scope, turning everyday devices into

0:01:41.567 --> 0:01:46.687
<v Speaker 4>weapons of war. At least thirty two people, including two children.

0:01:46.767 --> 0:01:49.847
<v Speaker 4>Reports vary between two and four children were killed and

0:01:49.967 --> 0:01:53.687
<v Speaker 4>thousands more were injured. Many of the explosions happened in

0:01:53.727 --> 0:01:57.127
<v Speaker 4>the vicinity of large crowds. Hesbelah has said this was

0:01:57.167 --> 0:02:00.807
<v Speaker 4>an attack by Israel, but so far Israeli officials have

0:02:00.887 --> 0:02:06.367
<v Speaker 4>declined to comment. Hesbelah has vowed retaliation. And I found

0:02:06.727 --> 0:02:09.567
<v Speaker 4>something deeply unsettling in the reporting of the so over

0:02:09.607 --> 0:02:13.207
<v Speaker 4>the weekend, I felt as though headlines and even the

0:02:13.287 --> 0:02:16.007
<v Speaker 4>tone that was existing in a lot of the coverage

0:02:16.447 --> 0:02:18.887
<v Speaker 4>was as though this was some sort of action movie,

0:02:19.127 --> 0:02:21.487
<v Speaker 4>as if children didn't make up some of the casualties.

0:02:22.127 --> 0:02:25.327
<v Speaker 4>And it felt like and it has felt like this

0:02:25.367 --> 0:02:28.647
<v Speaker 4>for months that were becoming increasingly desensitized to the loss

0:02:28.847 --> 0:02:33.087
<v Speaker 4>of human life. There's been comparisons to the James Bond

0:02:33.287 --> 0:02:37.527
<v Speaker 4>element of it. I was reading one very highly respected

0:02:37.687 --> 0:02:40.847
<v Speaker 4>publication that referred to it as an achievement, and I

0:02:40.887 --> 0:02:43.087
<v Speaker 4>thought of the parents of the kids who lost their lives,

0:02:43.487 --> 0:02:45.807
<v Speaker 4>and if I was in Lebanon or in any part

0:02:45.967 --> 0:02:48.807
<v Speaker 4>of the Middle East right now, I'd be terrified, more

0:02:48.887 --> 0:02:51.767
<v Speaker 4>terrified than I was a week ago. So it just

0:02:51.807 --> 0:02:54.447
<v Speaker 4>served as a reminder to me that regardless of where

0:02:54.447 --> 0:02:58.167
<v Speaker 4>you are in the world, the innocent human life matters,

0:02:58.327 --> 0:03:00.967
<v Speaker 4>and we've got to be careful not to get excited

0:03:01.047 --> 0:03:04.487
<v Speaker 4>or gleeful because there's new technology, because this isn't a

0:03:04.527 --> 0:03:05.047
<v Speaker 4>video game.

0:03:05.167 --> 0:03:05.967
<v Speaker 3>These are real people.

0:03:06.247 --> 0:03:09.167
<v Speaker 1>It reminded me a little bit that sort of all

0:03:09.367 --> 0:03:12.287
<v Speaker 1>or is the wrong word, but it's all a new technology.

0:03:12.647 --> 0:03:15.727
<v Speaker 1>In nineteen ninety, when the Iraq War started, there was

0:03:16.007 --> 0:03:19.127
<v Speaker 1>again another big leap in technology, with drones and cameras

0:03:19.127 --> 0:03:20.967
<v Speaker 1>been used to drop bombs on targets, which you could

0:03:21.007 --> 0:03:24.767
<v Speaker 1>then also see. We watched that on CNN and pilots

0:03:24.807 --> 0:03:27.047
<v Speaker 1>were watching it on these screens, and there were interviews

0:03:27.047 --> 0:03:30.007
<v Speaker 1>with the pilots after they finished their missions and bombings,

0:03:30.047 --> 0:03:32.207
<v Speaker 1>and they came off and these were like pretty young

0:03:32.247 --> 0:03:34.087
<v Speaker 1>guys and they were like, it was so cool. It

0:03:34.127 --> 0:03:37.567
<v Speaker 1>was like playing a video game. And even then there

0:03:37.607 --> 0:03:39.967
<v Speaker 1>was a little bit of discomfort in the same way

0:03:40.007 --> 0:03:43.007
<v Speaker 1>that you say, where it can be really easy to

0:03:43.127 --> 0:03:46.967
<v Speaker 1>forget that there are human lives, and in the case

0:03:47.167 --> 0:03:51.447
<v Speaker 1>of what happened with Hesbola, the targets of this attack

0:03:51.927 --> 0:03:55.687
<v Speaker 1>were terrorists whose sole aim is to kill other people.

0:03:56.407 --> 0:03:58.487
<v Speaker 1>So I guess you would say very clearly they were

0:03:58.527 --> 0:04:01.007
<v Speaker 1>the bad guys, but also civilians were injured and killed,

0:04:01.687 --> 0:04:03.767
<v Speaker 1>and they weren't bad guys, they were civilians.

0:04:04.167 --> 0:04:08.287
<v Speaker 2>I think also it's worth remembering that as we're watching

0:04:08.287 --> 0:04:10.647
<v Speaker 2>this and everybody's talk talking about how did it happen,

0:04:10.687 --> 0:04:15.687
<v Speaker 2>and pages and walkie talkies and getting explosives into systems

0:04:15.687 --> 0:04:19.887
<v Speaker 2>inside people's homes, what it actually signals is an escalation

0:04:20.447 --> 0:04:22.727
<v Speaker 2>of something that I think a lot well obviously a

0:04:22.727 --> 0:04:25.367
<v Speaker 2>lot of the world is very invested in de escalation

0:04:25.687 --> 0:04:28.447
<v Speaker 2>of the Middle East, in the Middle East, and so

0:04:28.647 --> 0:04:30.847
<v Speaker 2>it's not good news for anyone who was hoping that

0:04:31.527 --> 0:04:34.447
<v Speaker 2>peace was closer, because it's only further away.

0:04:35.287 --> 0:04:38.567
<v Speaker 1>If anyone was wondering where Milania Trump has been during

0:04:38.567 --> 0:04:42.567
<v Speaker 1>the past few years, she's been writing her autobiography and

0:04:42.607 --> 0:04:44.887
<v Speaker 1>also signing a deal to make her own range of

0:04:44.927 --> 0:04:49.127
<v Speaker 1>Christmas decorations Thank God, which is unexpected because when she

0:04:49.167 --> 0:04:51.647
<v Speaker 1>and Donald Trump were in the White House, you might remember,

0:04:51.807 --> 0:04:54.567
<v Speaker 1>hopefully you don't. You know, every first lady's in charge

0:04:54.567 --> 0:04:57.367
<v Speaker 1>of decorating the White House for Christmas and their choice

0:04:57.367 --> 0:05:01.167
<v Speaker 1>of Christmas decorations. Her choice was very dystopian. It was

0:05:01.207 --> 0:05:05.887
<v Speaker 1>a lot of black trees and it was like melefelsince House.

0:05:06.087 --> 0:05:08.647
<v Speaker 1>Maybe there was a leaked phone call where she said,

0:05:09.287 --> 0:05:13.087
<v Speaker 1>I fucking hate Christmas. Anyway, Times Change now are launching

0:05:13.167 --> 0:05:17.207
<v Speaker 1>Christmas decorations. But the promotional strategy for her book is

0:05:17.287 --> 0:05:20.047
<v Speaker 1>what has been rolling out in the most surreal way

0:05:20.327 --> 0:05:23.207
<v Speaker 1>the last few days with a series of again pretty

0:05:23.247 --> 0:05:27.367
<v Speaker 1>dystopian videos, short in black and white. She really does

0:05:27.527 --> 0:05:31.847
<v Speaker 1>like that quite severe, very stark lighting heavy.

0:05:31.967 --> 0:05:36.047
<v Speaker 2>Usually yeah, she thinks it's sophisticated because dramatic music. What

0:05:36.127 --> 0:05:37.727
<v Speaker 2>I've seen of the cover of a book is it's

0:05:37.727 --> 0:05:39.807
<v Speaker 2>literally just a white Do you think that's really.

0:05:39.607 --> 0:05:41.967
<v Speaker 1>The No, I don't think that is a way I cover well.

0:05:42.007 --> 0:05:44.287
<v Speaker 1>In these videos she talks about all manner of things

0:05:44.287 --> 0:05:48.407
<v Speaker 1>and looks and sounds well, kind of disconcertingly like dystopian AI.

0:05:49.487 --> 0:05:51.367
<v Speaker 1>The book isn't actually out from a couple of weeks,

0:05:51.367 --> 0:05:53.687
<v Speaker 1>so nobody's seen the actual cover already yet, but here's

0:05:53.727 --> 0:05:55.487
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of a taste of the videos.

0:05:55.687 --> 0:05:59.767
<v Speaker 5>Writing this memoir has been a deeply personal and reflective

0:05:59.847 --> 0:06:04.687
<v Speaker 5>journey for me, as a private person who has often

0:06:04.727 --> 0:06:10.807
<v Speaker 5>been the subject of public scrutiny and misrepresentation. I feel

0:06:10.807 --> 0:06:15.847
<v Speaker 5>a responsibility to clarify the facts. I believe it is

0:06:15.887 --> 0:06:19.087
<v Speaker 5>important to share my perspective the truth.

0:06:19.567 --> 0:06:22.047
<v Speaker 1>But the title of one of these videos, in particular

0:06:22.087 --> 0:06:24.967
<v Speaker 1>that I didn't play just then, stands out, and it is,

0:06:25.287 --> 0:06:28.447
<v Speaker 1>why do I stand proudly behind my new modeling work?

0:06:29.167 --> 0:06:30.887
<v Speaker 1>So you know it's going to be really excellent before

0:06:30.887 --> 0:06:33.167
<v Speaker 1>you even here? Ply on this one, here's a little

0:06:33.207 --> 0:06:35.967
<v Speaker 1>bit of what she says in that video.

0:06:35.607 --> 0:06:39.087
<v Speaker 5>Why do I stand proudly behind my nude modeling work?

0:06:40.207 --> 0:06:44.407
<v Speaker 5>The more pressing question is why has the media chosen

0:06:44.447 --> 0:06:48.607
<v Speaker 5>to scrutinize my celebration of the human forum in a

0:06:48.647 --> 0:06:52.527
<v Speaker 5>fashion photoshoot? Are we no longer able to appreciate the

0:06:52.567 --> 0:06:58.367
<v Speaker 5>beauty of the human body? Throughout history, master artists have

0:06:58.487 --> 0:07:03.567
<v Speaker 5>revered the human shape, evoking profound emotions and admiration. We

0:07:03.567 --> 0:07:07.767
<v Speaker 5>should honor our bodies and embrace the timeless tradition of

0:07:07.967 --> 0:07:11.847
<v Speaker 5>using art as a powerful means of self expression.

0:07:12.367 --> 0:07:16.087
<v Speaker 1>While she was talking that voiceover on the video, there

0:07:16.127 --> 0:07:19.207
<v Speaker 1>were all pictures of like famous works of art by

0:07:19.247 --> 0:07:24.167
<v Speaker 1>famous artists like Angel and Sassan, And she didn't actually

0:07:24.207 --> 0:07:26.607
<v Speaker 1>show her pictures, but she post naked for a French

0:07:26.647 --> 0:07:30.087
<v Speaker 1>adult magazine in nineteen ninety five and for British GQ

0:07:30.407 --> 0:07:34.247
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand and The modeling photos were highlighted a

0:07:34.247 --> 0:07:37.767
<v Speaker 1>little bit in the twenty sixteen campaign when The New

0:07:37.807 --> 0:07:40.487
<v Speaker 1>York Post published several of the nude photos. Because of course,

0:07:40.487 --> 0:07:43.127
<v Speaker 1>there is going to be some media discussion about your

0:07:43.207 --> 0:07:45.767
<v Speaker 1>nudes when you're the first lady or the want to

0:07:45.767 --> 0:07:47.847
<v Speaker 1>be first lady, especially when your husband is all about

0:07:47.887 --> 0:07:52.727
<v Speaker 1>slut shaming female enemies and imposing traditional roles for women.

0:07:52.967 --> 0:07:56.847
<v Speaker 1>So we're certainly not endorsing any shaming of anyone for

0:07:56.927 --> 0:08:00.047
<v Speaker 1>being nude. But what's interesting is that she's answering a

0:08:00.127 --> 0:08:04.527
<v Speaker 1>question that nobody was asking, and it's puzzling, Holly, what's

0:08:04.567 --> 0:08:04.967
<v Speaker 1>going on.

0:08:05.447 --> 0:08:08.767
<v Speaker 2>So apparently Milania has asked for the rights for those

0:08:08.807 --> 0:08:11.767
<v Speaker 2>images to include in her memoir. So she wants you,

0:08:12.087 --> 0:08:14.247
<v Speaker 2>she wants to republish that she wants you to know

0:08:14.327 --> 0:08:16.007
<v Speaker 2>that those nudes are going to be in her book.

0:08:16.247 --> 0:08:17.567
<v Speaker 3>So she going for and Rada.

0:08:17.647 --> 0:08:20.087
<v Speaker 2>I think she's going full and Rada. But also I

0:08:20.127 --> 0:08:24.447
<v Speaker 2>am obsessed with Milania Trump. Why because say what you

0:08:24.527 --> 0:08:26.527
<v Speaker 2>like about Donald Trump, and we have said many things

0:08:26.607 --> 0:08:30.567
<v Speaker 2>about Donald Trump. His era of political assent in the

0:08:30.647 --> 0:08:33.607
<v Speaker 2>US has ripped up so many conventions, all the sort

0:08:33.647 --> 0:08:36.487
<v Speaker 2>of things that we used to insist on from politicians,

0:08:36.527 --> 0:08:38.407
<v Speaker 2>like that they at least pretend to be a nice

0:08:38.447 --> 0:08:40.487
<v Speaker 2>sort of human being and can go around saying things

0:08:40.487 --> 0:08:43.447
<v Speaker 2>like grabbing by the posse and insisting the elections that

0:08:43.447 --> 0:08:45.247
<v Speaker 2>you lost that you actually won, and all those things

0:08:45.247 --> 0:08:47.847
<v Speaker 2>that we used to think, oh, that's not very presidential,

0:08:48.007 --> 0:08:51.287
<v Speaker 2>things like fidelity and all that's gone, lack of nudity

0:08:51.327 --> 0:08:54.367
<v Speaker 2>in Paul being a felon. But you could argue that

0:08:54.447 --> 0:08:57.367
<v Speaker 2>all that through some lenses, you could say it's quite refreshing,

0:08:57.447 --> 0:08:59.567
<v Speaker 2>because American presidents have got away with a whole lot

0:08:59.567 --> 0:09:01.247
<v Speaker 2>of shit a lot of time, but they always had

0:09:01.287 --> 0:09:04.407
<v Speaker 2>to pretend that they had this lovely wife by their

0:09:04.487 --> 0:09:08.127
<v Speaker 2>side who adored them, happy family, blah blah blah. Milania

0:09:08.367 --> 0:09:13.447
<v Speaker 2>barely even pretends to live with him, like him sleep

0:09:13.487 --> 0:09:16.367
<v Speaker 2>with him, certainly, not hang around him, hold his hand.

0:09:16.807 --> 0:09:19.367
<v Speaker 2>I think she obviously has. I mean, I know this speculation,

0:09:19.447 --> 0:09:21.407
<v Speaker 2>but a lot of people say a certain amount of

0:09:21.447 --> 0:09:23.967
<v Speaker 2>agreed appearances are in their.

0:09:24.047 --> 0:09:24.887
<v Speaker 1>Contracts quite well.

0:09:24.927 --> 0:09:26.887
<v Speaker 2>So she's like, you know, I know you do kind

0:09:26.887 --> 0:09:28.607
<v Speaker 2>of need a wife by your side as you're running

0:09:28.607 --> 0:09:30.047
<v Speaker 2>for president. We're not going to do this in a

0:09:30.087 --> 0:09:33.367
<v Speaker 2>conventional way. I'll just turn up on these particular dates.

0:09:34.087 --> 0:09:36.847
<v Speaker 2>The book is great. It's released on October the eighth,

0:09:36.847 --> 0:09:39.367
<v Speaker 2>which is less than a month before the presidential election.

0:09:39.527 --> 0:09:41.047
<v Speaker 1>Now again, have you seen it?

0:09:41.447 --> 0:09:44.607
<v Speaker 2>No? I mean it sounds great from this, like such

0:09:44.647 --> 0:09:47.167
<v Speaker 2>a good idea. You're like, I'm going to published a

0:09:47.247 --> 0:09:52.447
<v Speaker 2>memoir a month before MyD It's just hilarious. It's just

0:09:52.527 --> 0:09:55.207
<v Speaker 2>hilarious because the thing that the Trump's are great out

0:09:55.287 --> 0:09:58.487
<v Speaker 2>is grifting. So on her site, you can buy images

0:09:58.527 --> 0:10:01.127
<v Speaker 2>of her, you can buy NFTs that she's made of,

0:10:01.167 --> 0:10:03.287
<v Speaker 2>like pretty flowers, you can buy Christmas ornaments, you can

0:10:03.327 --> 0:10:08.167
<v Speaker 2>buy jewelry. It's like working every angle right srifters, which

0:10:08.287 --> 0:10:11.567
<v Speaker 2>is not again not generally what first ladies do. And

0:10:11.647 --> 0:10:14.247
<v Speaker 2>I have to say that what I admire in all this,

0:10:15.007 --> 0:10:17.647
<v Speaker 2>I mean I don't really admire in any way, but

0:10:17.727 --> 0:10:21.767
<v Speaker 2>I admire their complete disregard for convention. Like for years

0:10:21.807 --> 0:10:25.007
<v Speaker 2>and decades and forever, first ladies have had to pretend.

0:10:25.327 --> 0:10:27.407
<v Speaker 2>She's not pretending, She's just going all out.

0:10:27.527 --> 0:10:31.047
<v Speaker 4>You say that, But what Milania has done here, which

0:10:31.127 --> 0:10:34.767
<v Speaker 4>is surprising, is that she's agreed to be a cog

0:10:35.367 --> 0:10:37.967
<v Speaker 4>in Trump's election campaign.

0:10:37.607 --> 0:10:40.767
<v Speaker 2>But only if it benefits her and her Christmas ornament business.

0:10:40.807 --> 0:10:42.927
<v Speaker 4>Do you think she really wanted to write this book.

0:10:43.127 --> 0:10:44.767
<v Speaker 4>I feel as though they sat down and they looked

0:10:44.767 --> 0:10:48.847
<v Speaker 4>at Trump's campaign and they went, what we need here

0:10:49.007 --> 0:10:52.487
<v Speaker 4>is Milania to say something, or to stand for something,

0:10:52.607 --> 0:10:56.647
<v Speaker 4>or to contribute to the momentum. Obviously, one of the

0:10:56.687 --> 0:10:59.527
<v Speaker 4>clips that went quite viral was the one where she

0:10:59.927 --> 0:11:03.127
<v Speaker 4>is suggesting that there was more to the assassination attempt,

0:11:03.127 --> 0:11:06.127
<v Speaker 4>and she shares the family perspective that he's someone who

0:11:06.167 --> 0:11:08.087
<v Speaker 4>you know, he's a father and he's a husband. And

0:11:08.607 --> 0:11:11.647
<v Speaker 4>how much at her what she's doing, at least in

0:11:11.687 --> 0:11:13.647
<v Speaker 4>this promotion is humanizing him.

0:11:14.127 --> 0:11:16.287
<v Speaker 2>I don't think so, though, do you know what I mean? Like,

0:11:16.767 --> 0:11:19.167
<v Speaker 2>maybe that might be a strategy if it was a

0:11:19.167 --> 0:11:20.567
<v Speaker 2>completely different strategy.

0:11:20.607 --> 0:11:23.487
<v Speaker 1>So she's talking more from the videos that have been

0:11:23.527 --> 0:11:27.727
<v Speaker 1>released so far, it's more talking politically because she's like,

0:11:27.767 --> 0:11:31.167
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty, the election happened and it changed everything

0:11:31.287 --> 0:11:34.967
<v Speaker 1>gasoline prices, cost of living, and it's like, that's not

0:11:35.287 --> 0:11:38.807
<v Speaker 1>the perspective that I would be most interested in from you.

0:11:38.967 --> 0:11:41.607
<v Speaker 1>And look, there's also a long history of first ladies

0:11:41.647 --> 0:11:44.927
<v Speaker 1>and former first ladies writing their story, and they absolutely

0:11:44.967 --> 0:11:46.647
<v Speaker 1>should because their perspective is interesting.

0:11:46.767 --> 0:11:48.527
<v Speaker 3>Hillary Clinton just released a book this week.

0:11:48.607 --> 0:11:53.567
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but also Michelle Obama, her extraordinary book, Becoming, which

0:11:53.607 --> 0:11:55.967
<v Speaker 1>is one of the top selling nonfiction books of all time.

0:11:56.767 --> 0:11:59.927
<v Speaker 1>I know what you're saying, Holly, that she's disregarding all

0:11:59.967 --> 0:12:03.887
<v Speaker 1>of those conventions, which is ironic her saying, you know,

0:12:03.967 --> 0:12:07.087
<v Speaker 1>the nude body's fine when her husband is so sexist

0:12:07.087 --> 0:12:08.487
<v Speaker 1>and well at all women.

0:12:08.487 --> 0:12:10.407
<v Speaker 2>I'm not sure that all his far right bodies would

0:12:10.447 --> 0:12:10.847
<v Speaker 2>agree that.

0:12:11.127 --> 0:12:15.087
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but if you've read Michelle Obama's book, The First

0:12:15.247 --> 0:12:18.767
<v Speaker 1>First Lady of Color, what she had to do and

0:12:19.007 --> 0:12:22.007
<v Speaker 1>what she had to not do, like the tiny, tiny,

0:12:22.127 --> 0:12:26.047
<v Speaker 1>tiny little space that she had, she couldn't say this,

0:12:26.207 --> 0:12:28.287
<v Speaker 1>she couldn't be that, she couldn't do this, she couldn't

0:12:28.287 --> 0:12:30.007
<v Speaker 1>show her arm. She had to wear a hair like this,

0:12:30.367 --> 0:12:33.287
<v Speaker 1>couldn't raise her voice, all of these things, and I

0:12:33.287 --> 0:12:35.367
<v Speaker 1>guess the same qulb we said for Barack Obama compared

0:12:35.407 --> 0:12:39.887
<v Speaker 1>to Donald Trump as the first black couple. Compared to them,

0:12:40.127 --> 0:12:43.687
<v Speaker 1>it's just not fair, like the double standards are just yeah.

0:12:43.687 --> 0:12:46.807
<v Speaker 2>But again, it's strange because you know the thing that

0:12:46.927 --> 0:12:49.607
<v Speaker 2>is interesting about if this is a strategy to use

0:12:49.687 --> 0:12:52.447
<v Speaker 2>Milania to remind everybody that Trump has a wife and

0:12:52.447 --> 0:12:54.687
<v Speaker 2>a family, I don't know that that's really what this does.

0:12:54.927 --> 0:12:57.807
<v Speaker 2>Like these very stark black and white talking to the

0:12:57.807 --> 0:13:01.447
<v Speaker 2>camera about things like that relatable the videos I've watched.

0:13:01.567 --> 0:13:04.687
<v Speaker 2>It's everything from that time I renovated the rose garden

0:13:04.767 --> 0:13:07.487
<v Speaker 2>in a white house to how the election was stolen,

0:13:07.847 --> 0:13:10.247
<v Speaker 2>to the very important role I've played in this thing,

0:13:10.327 --> 0:13:12.127
<v Speaker 2>that thing to nude photos like they're.

0:13:12.287 --> 0:13:14.167
<v Speaker 4>They're not saying I love Donald and I love sitting

0:13:14.167 --> 0:13:15.207
<v Speaker 4>next to him on the couch.

0:13:15.327 --> 0:13:19.167
<v Speaker 2>It's interesting because I don't know that necessarily, given Trump's

0:13:19.167 --> 0:13:22.487
<v Speaker 2>position on race that he's been stoking hard lately, that

0:13:22.647 --> 0:13:25.447
<v Speaker 2>it is that great for his base to be reminded,

0:13:25.447 --> 0:13:27.727
<v Speaker 2>Because you know, you very rarely see Millennia's speak, right,

0:13:27.767 --> 0:13:30.127
<v Speaker 2>so when you do like like other women who you

0:13:30.127 --> 0:13:31.967
<v Speaker 2>don't see talk very often, like Kate Moss. You were

0:13:31.967 --> 0:13:34.887
<v Speaker 2>saying on Friday, Mia that when you do see her talk,

0:13:34.927 --> 0:13:36.327
<v Speaker 2>it's a bit of a jolt because you're like, oh,

0:13:36.327 --> 0:13:39.287
<v Speaker 2>that's right. And she's from Slovenia, so she has an accent.

0:13:39.327 --> 0:13:41.847
<v Speaker 2>And I wonder if the Trump's base that's probably not

0:13:41.887 --> 0:13:42.447
<v Speaker 2>a good thing.

0:13:42.687 --> 0:13:46.407
<v Speaker 4>But it's not like Trump and his team are going

0:13:46.447 --> 0:13:48.927
<v Speaker 4>to be surprised that millani are. Oh, no, of How's

0:13:49.167 --> 0:13:51.127
<v Speaker 4>And I think it's worth noting as well that Donald

0:13:51.127 --> 0:13:52.847
<v Speaker 4>Trump has said he hasn't had time to read it.

0:13:54.007 --> 0:13:55.807
<v Speaker 4>He hasn't had time to read it, but he says

0:13:55.887 --> 0:13:57.927
<v Speaker 4>you should read it unless they are bad things about

0:13:57.927 --> 0:14:00.647
<v Speaker 4>me in it, And then don't I see it as

0:14:00.967 --> 0:14:03.447
<v Speaker 4>positioning Millennia because there's got a big strategy behind this.

0:14:03.647 --> 0:14:05.887
<v Speaker 4>I'm sorry, but you're not getting a book written by Milania.

0:14:05.927 --> 0:14:07.007
<v Speaker 1>It's an always.

0:14:06.687 --> 0:14:10.807
<v Speaker 6>Strategy, but you don't sell published. Do you remember when

0:14:10.807 --> 0:14:13.407
<v Speaker 6>she wore that jacket and it said frankly, I don't

0:14:13.527 --> 0:14:15.967
<v Speaker 6>care or yeah, whatever it was when she was going

0:14:16.007 --> 0:14:19.007
<v Speaker 6>to the border to see the kids in the cages.

0:14:19.087 --> 0:14:21.527
<v Speaker 4>But she said, and I'm trying to take this from

0:14:21.567 --> 0:14:24.967
<v Speaker 4>like a perspective of a Republican or someone who supports

0:14:24.967 --> 0:14:26.927
<v Speaker 4>his family, because let's not forget half of Americans do.

0:14:27.487 --> 0:14:31.647
<v Speaker 4>She said that message was for all the media criticizing her,

0:14:31.687 --> 0:14:33.847
<v Speaker 4>and she took the jacket off before she saw the children,

0:14:33.887 --> 0:14:35.887
<v Speaker 4>and that was a way to signal to the media.

0:14:35.927 --> 0:14:39.887
<v Speaker 2>And she also the most human I've ever heard Millania sound.

0:14:40.047 --> 0:14:41.887
<v Speaker 2>And I don't mean in any way the way she speaks,

0:14:41.887 --> 0:14:44.367
<v Speaker 2>but in terms of what she's saying. Is in the

0:14:44.487 --> 0:14:46.967
<v Speaker 2>leaked phone call that we referenced earlier where she said,

0:14:47.087 --> 0:14:49.847
<v Speaker 2>who gives a fuck about Christmas? She was complaining about

0:14:49.847 --> 0:14:51.887
<v Speaker 2>the criticism that she gets in the media, and she

0:14:51.927 --> 0:14:54.287
<v Speaker 2>did sound like an actual human being, and she was saying,

0:14:54.287 --> 0:14:56.687
<v Speaker 2>they don't care what I think about those children, They

0:14:56.687 --> 0:14:58.287
<v Speaker 2>don't care about this, or that they want me to

0:14:58.327 --> 0:14:59.767
<v Speaker 2>give it into you Fox. I don't want to give

0:14:59.767 --> 0:15:02.447
<v Speaker 2>an interview to Fox like she. I think that Millennia

0:15:02.567 --> 0:15:05.687
<v Speaker 2>is much harder to manage and handle and put in

0:15:05.687 --> 0:15:08.127
<v Speaker 2>a neat little box for Trump than a lot of

0:15:08.167 --> 0:15:08.887
<v Speaker 2>other first ladies.

0:15:08.927 --> 0:15:10.807
<v Speaker 4>See. I think that when they came up with a plan,

0:15:10.887 --> 0:15:13.767
<v Speaker 4>and they came up with what Trump's campaign would look like,

0:15:13.967 --> 0:15:15.847
<v Speaker 4>this was part of the strategy. This was very much

0:15:15.887 --> 0:15:18.647
<v Speaker 4>part of the strategy, and there were things that are

0:15:18.727 --> 0:15:21.607
<v Speaker 4>intentionally like for example, the framing of Millennia as a

0:15:21.647 --> 0:15:24.007
<v Speaker 4>mother and her talking about loving motherhood, Like I think

0:15:24.047 --> 0:15:25.287
<v Speaker 4>that's important for a first lady.

0:15:25.487 --> 0:15:27.927
<v Speaker 2>Is the selling of ornaments and jewelry fit into that?

0:15:28.527 --> 0:15:31.487
<v Speaker 1>Oh well, I guess it's Is it grift or is

0:15:31.527 --> 0:15:34.807
<v Speaker 1>it like think, well, it's not raising money for anyone,

0:15:34.967 --> 0:15:36.247
<v Speaker 1>like if it's not a lot.

0:15:36.167 --> 0:15:38.527
<v Speaker 3>Of people release books, so they're not raising money.

0:15:38.727 --> 0:15:41.047
<v Speaker 1>I mean the Christmas ornaments, like the Christmas ornaments is

0:15:41.087 --> 0:15:44.007
<v Speaker 1>pure grift. But what I love about Milania the only

0:15:44.087 --> 0:15:46.687
<v Speaker 1>thing is that she's been quite quitting since before that

0:15:46.767 --> 0:15:49.847
<v Speaker 1>was even a thing. Yes, she's been quite quitting her

0:15:49.927 --> 0:15:52.167
<v Speaker 1>role as a wife. She hates all this stuff, quite

0:15:52.287 --> 0:15:55.487
<v Speaker 1>quit as a first lady, like pretty much the only

0:15:55.527 --> 0:15:58.967
<v Speaker 1>achievement she had was redesigning the Rose Garden and her

0:15:59.087 --> 0:16:03.007
<v Speaker 1>be Best campaign, which actually no one could understand what

0:16:03.087 --> 0:16:05.927
<v Speaker 1>it was for and what it meant. So I think

0:16:05.967 --> 0:16:08.607
<v Speaker 1>by all objective measures, she was pretty ineffective first lady,

0:16:08.647 --> 0:16:12.327
<v Speaker 1>And yet everyone expected her to split with him after

0:16:13.287 --> 0:16:15.487
<v Speaker 1>they left the White House. That's why I find she

0:16:15.607 --> 0:16:17.727
<v Speaker 1>didn't so she obviously signed on for a.

0:16:17.647 --> 0:16:21.007
<v Speaker 4>New isn't very quiet quitting of her. This is a

0:16:21.087 --> 0:16:23.287
<v Speaker 4>nice Again.

0:16:23.487 --> 0:16:25.607
<v Speaker 2>I don't think it's good strategy to have the first

0:16:25.687 --> 0:16:27.927
<v Speaker 2>Lady release a book one month before the election. I

0:16:27.967 --> 0:16:30.287
<v Speaker 2>think you wait for that because it could be depending

0:16:30.327 --> 0:16:31.927
<v Speaker 2>what was in that book. And there isn't going to

0:16:31.927 --> 0:16:34.287
<v Speaker 2>be anything silatious in the book, apart from the nude photos,

0:16:34.287 --> 0:16:36.687
<v Speaker 2>which will be fun. If there was anything slacious in it.

0:16:36.687 --> 0:16:39.127
<v Speaker 2>It pulls focus. It's distracting. Da da da da da,

0:16:39.167 --> 0:16:42.567
<v Speaker 2>like in a conventional campaign, that would all come later,

0:16:42.727 --> 0:16:45.367
<v Speaker 2>Like you don't want that to happen. This is what

0:16:45.407 --> 0:16:47.767
<v Speaker 2>I mean about them, is that they just do these

0:16:47.807 --> 0:16:51.207
<v Speaker 2>crazy things. And I think that Milania my read on

0:16:51.287 --> 0:16:54.727
<v Speaker 2>her as always reading and watching things about supermodels and

0:16:54.767 --> 0:16:57.127
<v Speaker 2>all that, and that era of time when she started

0:16:57.207 --> 0:17:00.167
<v Speaker 2>dating Trump and married Trump. I don't think this is

0:17:00.167 --> 0:17:02.647
<v Speaker 2>what she ever signed up for. Right she thought, I'm

0:17:02.647 --> 0:17:04.487
<v Speaker 2>marrying a rich dude. I'm going to get to live

0:17:04.487 --> 0:17:07.127
<v Speaker 2>in my fancy house in New York and have my

0:17:07.207 --> 0:17:11.247
<v Speaker 2>child and just basically be a rich lady in New York.

0:17:11.367 --> 0:17:13.087
<v Speaker 2>She didn't sign up for any of this, and you

0:17:13.167 --> 0:17:15.847
<v Speaker 2>can tell how much she hates it all the time,

0:17:15.887 --> 0:17:17.687
<v Speaker 2>and I don't know, I find that kind of appealing

0:17:17.967 --> 0:17:18.487
<v Speaker 2>out louders.

0:17:18.527 --> 0:17:20.207
<v Speaker 1>If you want to stay up to date with what's

0:17:20.207 --> 0:17:22.407
<v Speaker 1>happening in the US, there's two types of people, the

0:17:22.407 --> 0:17:25.767
<v Speaker 1>ones who are living for election coverage and the ones

0:17:25.927 --> 0:17:28.367
<v Speaker 1>who do not want to hear a word of it.

0:17:28.967 --> 0:17:30.887
<v Speaker 1>Now it's a great time to become a subscriber because

0:17:30.887 --> 0:17:33.087
<v Speaker 1>every week we've been inviting friend of the poet to

0:17:33.127 --> 0:17:36.487
<v Speaker 1>the incredibly knowledgeable Amelia lest onto the show to unpack

0:17:36.567 --> 0:17:39.487
<v Speaker 1>everything in US politics. I could listen to her for days.

0:17:39.887 --> 0:17:41.887
<v Speaker 1>You can listen to all of those episodes. There'll be

0:17:41.927 --> 0:17:44.007
<v Speaker 1>another one coming this week via the link in our

0:17:44.047 --> 0:17:44.967
<v Speaker 1>show notes.

0:17:46.167 --> 0:17:50.367
<v Speaker 5>The challenges and rewards of motherhood, from sleepless nights to

0:17:50.527 --> 0:17:56.647
<v Speaker 5>joyful milestones, bring immense fulfillment which only a mother understands.

0:17:56.927 --> 0:18:01.647
<v Speaker 4>Hell yoga boobs, fashion boobs, the desire for a bra

0:18:01.767 --> 0:18:05.007
<v Speaker 4>la summer. According to The New York Times, small breaths

0:18:05.127 --> 0:18:07.887
<v Speaker 4>have newfound power and they are all the rage in

0:18:07.927 --> 0:18:11.687
<v Speaker 4>the clinics of cosmetics surgents in the US, the biggest

0:18:11.727 --> 0:18:14.487
<v Speaker 4>increase in people who are getting breast reductions is in

0:18:14.527 --> 0:18:19.127
<v Speaker 4>women under thirty, but this rise isn't just happening overseas.

0:18:19.447 --> 0:18:22.367
<v Speaker 4>Last year, it was reported that breast reductions in Australia

0:18:22.567 --> 0:18:25.807
<v Speaker 4>had tripled over the three years before, and there has

0:18:25.847 --> 0:18:29.047
<v Speaker 4>been a push to make the surgery more accessible through Medicare.

0:18:29.607 --> 0:18:31.727
<v Speaker 4>I believe it covers some of the surgery, that's if

0:18:31.727 --> 0:18:34.887
<v Speaker 4>it's causing other health issues, but there's still a considerable gap.

0:18:35.287 --> 0:18:38.047
<v Speaker 4>The New York Times reports that patients used to ask

0:18:38.167 --> 0:18:40.007
<v Speaker 4>for sea cups. With reduction, it was like, I want

0:18:40.047 --> 0:18:42.447
<v Speaker 4>my sea cup, and now they're more likely to request

0:18:42.527 --> 0:18:46.767
<v Speaker 4>a B cup. Many of the patients are young, postpartum mothers.

0:18:47.407 --> 0:18:51.487
<v Speaker 4>The writer Lisa Miller concludes to decide to reduce them,

0:18:51.567 --> 0:18:54.127
<v Speaker 4>to make them lighter, smaller, easier to carry and cover,

0:18:54.287 --> 0:18:56.607
<v Speaker 4>more discreet, can be seen as an act of self

0:18:56.647 --> 0:19:00.807
<v Speaker 4>love and empowerment, a woman's prioritization finally, of her own

0:19:00.887 --> 0:19:05.647
<v Speaker 4>comfort and independence over what others have traditionally found sexy.

0:19:05.767 --> 0:19:07.647
<v Speaker 4>She writes that on the other hand, it can be

0:19:07.687 --> 0:19:11.007
<v Speaker 4>interpreted as self loathing, an agreement with a sexist culture

0:19:11.007 --> 0:19:14.367
<v Speaker 4>that can also regard larger breasts that aren't youthfully round

0:19:14.407 --> 0:19:20.287
<v Speaker 4>and upright as repulsive, droopy, flabby, jiggly, hard, to contain, Holly,

0:19:21.047 --> 0:19:23.687
<v Speaker 4>why do you think that small breasts everywhere?

0:19:24.287 --> 0:19:26.807
<v Speaker 2>Don't you just love it when it's arbitrarily decided that

0:19:26.847 --> 0:19:27.887
<v Speaker 2>parts of our bodies are.

0:19:27.767 --> 0:19:30.367
<v Speaker 3>Out of fashion. Yeah, it just happens all the time.

0:19:30.447 --> 0:19:32.647
<v Speaker 2>Just deal with that. Those boobs are not on trend.

0:19:32.887 --> 0:19:36.167
<v Speaker 2>Sort them out, won't you. But if we are accepting

0:19:36.207 --> 0:19:38.647
<v Speaker 2>the fact that there are body trends and that women

0:19:38.807 --> 0:19:41.647
<v Speaker 2>are adhering to them, I reckon this fits with two

0:19:41.687 --> 0:19:43.367
<v Speaker 2>trends at the moment. The fact that younger women in

0:19:43.407 --> 0:19:47.207
<v Speaker 2>particular want smaller boobs, a move away from the Kardashian

0:19:47.247 --> 0:19:49.167
<v Speaker 2>body and all the things that come along with that,

0:19:49.327 --> 0:19:51.607
<v Speaker 2>the curves. You know, we've seen it a lot on

0:19:51.727 --> 0:19:54.247
<v Speaker 2>red carpets, and we've seen it in that we're kind

0:19:54.247 --> 0:19:59.487
<v Speaker 2>of moving back culturally towards the skinny size zero aesthetic aesthetic,

0:20:00.087 --> 0:20:05.287
<v Speaker 2>and that's much cooler and then possibly a little more positively,

0:20:05.847 --> 0:20:08.767
<v Speaker 2>I'd say, the other trend is women giving fewer f's

0:20:08.767 --> 0:20:11.527
<v Speaker 2>about them. We've talked a lot about how all the

0:20:11.607 --> 0:20:14.807
<v Speaker 2>cool artists are young females at the minute, and Chapel

0:20:14.847 --> 0:20:16.687
<v Speaker 2>Rohane has this song where she talks about her type

0:20:16.687 --> 0:20:18.807
<v Speaker 2>and she's like, no long hair, no bra, and you.

0:20:18.767 --> 0:20:20.367
<v Speaker 3>Know exactly what she means.

0:20:20.807 --> 0:20:25.407
<v Speaker 2>There is a cool girl vibe that is very no

0:20:25.527 --> 0:20:29.647
<v Speaker 2>bra that only works if your boobs are little. Anybody

0:20:29.687 --> 0:20:32.127
<v Speaker 2>listening to this who has big boobs, and there will

0:20:32.167 --> 0:20:34.727
<v Speaker 2>be many many women go, yeah, it would be nice

0:20:34.767 --> 0:20:37.447
<v Speaker 2>to have little boobies that can just hop around with No,

0:20:37.967 --> 0:20:40.487
<v Speaker 2>that's not how it works the most of us.

0:20:40.527 --> 0:20:43.967
<v Speaker 4>The other trend there, though, I reckon is youth, so

0:20:44.327 --> 0:20:49.007
<v Speaker 4>like it's about smaller breasts are code for younger because

0:20:49.087 --> 0:20:52.807
<v Speaker 4>often if you've had babies, or if your menopausal or whatever,

0:20:53.247 --> 0:20:55.487
<v Speaker 4>the shape of your body changes. So there is something

0:20:56.047 --> 0:20:58.847
<v Speaker 4>I imagine like small breath and the braless thing. And

0:20:59.207 --> 0:21:01.487
<v Speaker 4>fashion is now the youth have such a hold on

0:21:01.527 --> 0:21:05.367
<v Speaker 4>all things fashion, which is like you know, no bras underneath,

0:21:05.567 --> 0:21:07.807
<v Speaker 4>or like the tops with all the cutouts and stuff

0:21:07.967 --> 0:21:08.527
<v Speaker 4>you need to.

0:21:08.487 --> 0:21:10.767
<v Speaker 2>Have you do. And also but I also think that

0:21:10.807 --> 0:21:13.327
<v Speaker 2>if there was anything positive in it, right, is that

0:21:13.367 --> 0:21:16.367
<v Speaker 2>if women have the financial power increasingly all the time

0:21:16.407 --> 0:21:18.327
<v Speaker 2>to be able to go this is the surgery I

0:21:18.367 --> 0:21:22.287
<v Speaker 2>want it could be seen as somehow positive, that it's

0:21:22.327 --> 0:21:25.447
<v Speaker 2>not this male fantasy of like bigger, bigger, bigger. It's

0:21:25.487 --> 0:21:28.367
<v Speaker 2>more like I know that having big boobs is I

0:21:28.367 --> 0:21:30.607
<v Speaker 2>don't mean I I mean one. I know that big

0:21:30.687 --> 0:21:33.767
<v Speaker 2>boobs can come with a lot of pain, discomfort, hiking

0:21:33.807 --> 0:21:35.487
<v Speaker 2>them around, having men's start, and all the time, you

0:21:35.527 --> 0:21:38.167
<v Speaker 2>know what, I'd like, smaller boobs. It's interesting when you

0:21:38.287 --> 0:21:40.487
<v Speaker 2>ask women what they want and they've got the power

0:21:40.487 --> 0:21:42.287
<v Speaker 2>to have it, they'll often say something different.

0:21:43.007 --> 0:21:46.207
<v Speaker 1>I would love smaller boobs for esthetic reasons only exactly,

0:21:46.287 --> 0:21:48.567
<v Speaker 1>and models have always had no boobs, right, And for

0:21:48.647 --> 0:21:51.727
<v Speaker 1>me it's different. It's not well, of course, I'm partly

0:21:51.927 --> 0:21:56.007
<v Speaker 1>influenced by the culture, but also I just don't feel

0:21:56.087 --> 0:22:00.127
<v Speaker 1>like their mind. Because I always had pretty small boobs

0:22:00.807 --> 0:22:05.327
<v Speaker 1>until perimenopause, when my boobs grew and they're now probably

0:22:05.327 --> 0:22:08.927
<v Speaker 1>a double D. I feel like they're not connected to me.

0:22:09.447 --> 0:22:12.287
<v Speaker 1>I don't feel like myself. And your body changes in

0:22:12.327 --> 0:22:14.487
<v Speaker 1>lots of ways as you get older, whether you've had

0:22:14.567 --> 0:22:18.607
<v Speaker 1>kids or not, and one of them is for many women,

0:22:18.687 --> 0:22:20.687
<v Speaker 1>your boobs get bigger. And I often think that that

0:22:20.807 --> 0:22:23.767
<v Speaker 1>must be difficult if you've had an augmentation when you

0:22:23.807 --> 0:22:27.007
<v Speaker 1>were younger. But they don't grow in like a perky way.

0:22:27.447 --> 0:22:30.287
<v Speaker 1>Even this morning, I didn't have that feeling of my

0:22:30.407 --> 0:22:33.727
<v Speaker 1>boobs touching my stomach when I bent over or something,

0:22:34.247 --> 0:22:35.807
<v Speaker 1>and I think there might have even been a little

0:22:35.807 --> 0:22:39.007
<v Speaker 1>slapping sound, and it's just I like it.

0:22:39.367 --> 0:22:43.007
<v Speaker 4>I was watching scenes from Friends because we're doing Friends

0:22:43.007 --> 0:22:46.567
<v Speaker 4>for canceled next week. I was going very deep on

0:22:46.607 --> 0:22:48.887
<v Speaker 4>fat Monica. Do you remember the fat Monica carrack.

0:22:48.807 --> 0:22:50.687
<v Speaker 1>When she'd wear a fats she'd wear a fat seed in.

0:22:50.647 --> 0:22:52.567
<v Speaker 2>The flashback, something that we don't do now.

0:22:52.727 --> 0:22:54.327
<v Speaker 3>We do not do that now. It was very of

0:22:54.367 --> 0:22:54.767
<v Speaker 3>the moment.

0:22:54.847 --> 0:22:56.767
<v Speaker 4>But if you look at photos of fat Monica, the

0:22:56.807 --> 0:22:59.407
<v Speaker 4>first thing you'll notice is it she's not fat. The

0:22:59.447 --> 0:23:01.447
<v Speaker 4>second thing you'll notice is she just has breasts. She

0:23:01.487 --> 0:23:05.247
<v Speaker 4>has breasts and hips. And I look at Courtney Cox

0:23:05.247 --> 0:23:06.767
<v Speaker 4>and who she was, and there's a whole thing to

0:23:06.767 --> 0:23:09.247
<v Speaker 4>be read there about how she was basically a clown

0:23:09.607 --> 0:23:14.447
<v Speaker 4>and mocked in those flashbacks. But I went, oh, that

0:23:14.527 --> 0:23:17.687
<v Speaker 4>body in the nineties was coded, even the way that

0:23:17.727 --> 0:23:21.727
<v Speaker 4>you'd skin dressed, the curvy body was coded as fat.

0:23:21.967 --> 0:23:25.167
<v Speaker 4>And then the Kardashians came along and kind of changed

0:23:25.367 --> 0:23:28.487
<v Speaker 4>change that. But now they're getting everything reversed. I think

0:23:28.487 --> 0:23:33.607
<v Speaker 4>the other element at play is exercise. So with women

0:23:34.087 --> 0:23:38.407
<v Speaker 4>prioritizing exercise more than we ever have, whether it's running

0:23:38.487 --> 0:23:41.007
<v Speaker 4>or going to the gym or or whatever. The size

0:23:41.007 --> 0:23:43.287
<v Speaker 4>of your boobs has an enormous impact on your mobility and.

0:23:43.327 --> 0:23:44.047
<v Speaker 3>Literally can do.

0:23:44.127 --> 0:23:47.807
<v Speaker 1>Fact, I have to wear something called a shock absorber

0:23:47.847 --> 0:23:50.487
<v Speaker 1>bra under my sports bra. I have to wear two

0:23:50.567 --> 0:23:52.967
<v Speaker 1>and it cost are more than one hundred dollars. So

0:23:53.007 --> 0:23:55.127
<v Speaker 1>it's like there's a tax on having big boobs.

0:23:55.127 --> 0:23:58.647
<v Speaker 2>There definitely is. One of my oldest best friends has really,

0:23:58.727 --> 0:24:00.607
<v Speaker 2>really big boobs. We were used to joke when we

0:24:00.607 --> 0:24:02.607
<v Speaker 2>were at high school that she was saving up for

0:24:02.647 --> 0:24:05.807
<v Speaker 2>a breast reduction. Right, she never actually got one. She's

0:24:05.847 --> 0:24:08.767
<v Speaker 2>spent all of her life figuring out how to dress

0:24:08.807 --> 0:24:12.047
<v Speaker 2>that dress around her boobs, what swimwear to wear around

0:24:12.047 --> 0:24:14.527
<v Speaker 2>her boobs, what broad to wear around her boobs. Like

0:24:15.247 --> 0:24:17.847
<v Speaker 2>any conversation like this would drive her nuts because she'd

0:24:17.887 --> 0:24:20.767
<v Speaker 2>be like, you don't understand, Like, boobs aren't just these

0:24:20.807 --> 0:24:23.287
<v Speaker 2>fun things. If you've got really big boobs, it impacts

0:24:23.327 --> 0:24:26.487
<v Speaker 2>all kinds of things and is very expensive. But it's

0:24:26.607 --> 0:24:29.287
<v Speaker 2>interesting to me that it's always been a bit of

0:24:29.327 --> 0:24:32.247
<v Speaker 2>a status symbol. Well, certainly back to the friend Zierra

0:24:32.367 --> 0:24:34.607
<v Speaker 2>that you're talking about Jesse. That was the last time

0:24:34.647 --> 0:24:36.847
<v Speaker 2>it was really cool to be really skinny. If you

0:24:36.887 --> 0:24:40.167
<v Speaker 2>watch TV from that time, late nineties, early noughties, it

0:24:40.207 --> 0:24:42.247
<v Speaker 2>was size zero, it was tiny, skinny, it was no bra,

0:24:42.367 --> 0:24:45.847
<v Speaker 2>it was visible nipples. It was cool to be skinny.

0:24:46.127 --> 0:24:49.287
<v Speaker 2>And we're back there. Apparently, when you lose weight, your

0:24:49.327 --> 0:24:52.767
<v Speaker 2>boobs shrink quite dramatically, and that immediately gives you a

0:24:52.847 --> 0:24:56.047
<v Speaker 2>very different look in your clothes. But equally, as you say,

0:24:56.087 --> 0:24:58.407
<v Speaker 2>if you've got really big boobs, it doesn't matter how

0:24:58.487 --> 0:25:01.567
<v Speaker 2>much weight you lose, you're always gonna look bigger. And so,

0:25:01.967 --> 0:25:04.087
<v Speaker 2>because we live in a fat phobic society that thinks

0:25:04.087 --> 0:25:06.287
<v Speaker 2>all women should take up as little space as possible,

0:25:06.887 --> 0:25:11.647
<v Speaker 2>those boobs are really unfashioned. I guess it's really interesting.

0:25:11.767 --> 0:25:14.567
<v Speaker 1>Out louders tell us what do you think is the

0:25:14.647 --> 0:25:18.087
<v Speaker 1>size or the age where you go from having boobs

0:25:18.127 --> 0:25:22.127
<v Speaker 1>to having a bosom? Because I think I'm int the

0:25:22.167 --> 0:25:24.207
<v Speaker 1>bosom age and I don't like it.

0:25:27.207 --> 0:25:30.567
<v Speaker 4>Every Tuesday and Thursday we drop new segments of MUMMYA

0:25:30.567 --> 0:25:34.127
<v Speaker 4>out Loud just from MUMMYA. Subscribers follow the link in

0:25:34.167 --> 0:25:36.127
<v Speaker 4>the show notes to get your daily dose of out

0:25:36.167 --> 0:25:39.487
<v Speaker 4>Loud and a big thank you to all our current subscribers.

0:25:47.127 --> 0:25:52.087
<v Speaker 2>Take it down. Unfair, uncomfortable and sad to watch. People

0:25:52.167 --> 0:25:55.807
<v Speaker 2>magazine posted a clip of an exclusive interview with Hayden

0:25:55.807 --> 0:25:59.407
<v Speaker 2>Panettier last week, and plenty of people said that they

0:25:59.527 --> 0:26:02.687
<v Speaker 2>shouldn't have for a bit of context. Panetier is an

0:26:02.727 --> 0:26:05.447
<v Speaker 2>actress who blew up in the naughties on a show

0:26:05.527 --> 0:26:08.687
<v Speaker 2>called Heroes, and almost as soon as her star rows,

0:26:08.727 --> 0:26:11.927
<v Speaker 2>she became a tabloid fixture. Everyone was looking at her body.

0:26:12.007 --> 0:26:15.607
<v Speaker 2>She had on off relationship, there were rumors of substance abuse,

0:26:15.967 --> 0:26:19.167
<v Speaker 2>a well publicized episode of postnatal depression. After the birth

0:26:19.207 --> 0:26:21.887
<v Speaker 2>of her daughter, she searched back in the public censure

0:26:21.887 --> 0:26:23.767
<v Speaker 2>when she appeared on Nashville. We were all obsessed with that.

0:26:24.127 --> 0:26:26.447
<v Speaker 2>She was the singer Juliette Barnes in a role that

0:26:26.527 --> 0:26:28.607
<v Speaker 2>echoed a lot of what happened in her real life.

0:26:28.687 --> 0:26:30.047
<v Speaker 3>Right, good point.

0:26:30.087 --> 0:26:33.247
<v Speaker 2>I hadn't yeh addiction and that was a bit part

0:26:33.327 --> 0:26:35.767
<v Speaker 2>of why everybody was obsessed with her in that part.

0:26:36.167 --> 0:26:39.687
<v Speaker 2>In twenty twenty two, she said in People magazine actually

0:26:39.967 --> 0:26:42.927
<v Speaker 2>that she had received treatment for alcohol and opiate addiction.

0:26:43.367 --> 0:26:45.647
<v Speaker 2>She also said that this dated back to her being

0:26:45.647 --> 0:26:47.847
<v Speaker 2>a child star. She said that she was only fifteen

0:26:48.007 --> 0:26:50.527
<v Speaker 2>when people on her team started offering her what they

0:26:50.567 --> 0:26:53.527
<v Speaker 2>called happy pills when she was doing publicity. They were

0:26:53.527 --> 0:26:56.287
<v Speaker 2>to make me peppy during interviews. She said, I had

0:26:56.327 --> 0:26:58.847
<v Speaker 2>no idea that this was not an appropriate thing or

0:26:58.847 --> 0:27:00.807
<v Speaker 2>what door that would open for me when it came

0:27:00.847 --> 0:27:04.487
<v Speaker 2>to my addiction. Fast forward to last week, after quite

0:27:04.567 --> 0:27:07.287
<v Speaker 2>some time out of the media, she gave an interview

0:27:07.327 --> 0:27:09.127
<v Speaker 2>to People, and in it she talked about the loss

0:27:09.127 --> 0:27:12.407
<v Speaker 2>of her brother, who died last year from complications caused

0:27:12.407 --> 0:27:15.767
<v Speaker 2>by an enlarged heart. Here's a little bit of that interview.

0:27:16.087 --> 0:27:20.167
<v Speaker 7>Losing my little brother's there's nothing like I mean, he

0:27:20.287 --> 0:27:24.207
<v Speaker 7>was my only sibling, and he was my younger sibling,

0:27:24.567 --> 0:27:29.207
<v Speaker 7>and it was my job to protect him and my

0:27:29.367 --> 0:27:33.327
<v Speaker 7>lost him. They felt like I lost half of my soul.

0:27:33.647 --> 0:27:36.767
<v Speaker 7>I remember saying to somebody, and it hadn't even been

0:27:36.807 --> 0:27:41.167
<v Speaker 7>a year, and I was like, don't ever ever expect

0:27:41.247 --> 0:27:44.527
<v Speaker 7>me to get over the loss of him.

0:27:44.807 --> 0:27:47.447
<v Speaker 2>It immediately attracted a lot of criticism from people saying,

0:27:47.447 --> 0:27:50.967
<v Speaker 2>Paul Hayden, obviously not so, but do better. People, I'm

0:27:51.007 --> 0:27:53.807
<v Speaker 2>shocked that this is posted. It's uncomfortable and sad. To watch.

0:27:53.927 --> 0:27:56.647
<v Speaker 1>Can you describe how it looked whole, because you could

0:27:56.647 --> 0:27:58.807
<v Speaker 1>listen to that and you could go, oh, that doesn't

0:27:58.847 --> 0:27:59.527
<v Speaker 1>sound so bad.

0:27:59.647 --> 0:28:01.647
<v Speaker 3>Maybe she just sounds did look well.

0:28:01.687 --> 0:28:04.487
<v Speaker 2>It's a relatively close cut of her face. The way

0:28:04.527 --> 0:28:07.047
<v Speaker 2>I would describe it, she looks quite blank. Also, her

0:28:07.087 --> 0:28:12.607
<v Speaker 2>eyes are half closed, closing glassy. The noise got so

0:28:12.727 --> 0:28:15.087
<v Speaker 2>loud that she's had to release a statement. She said,

0:28:15.087 --> 0:28:17.207
<v Speaker 2>I'd like to take a moment to address the controversy.

0:28:17.247 --> 0:28:20.167
<v Speaker 2>It's unfathomable, but that I have to. Then she talks

0:28:20.207 --> 0:28:22.727
<v Speaker 2>about the fact that she was exhausted. She said she

0:28:22.767 --> 0:28:25.207
<v Speaker 2>hadn't slept for two days due to one of her dogs,

0:28:25.247 --> 0:28:28.527
<v Speaker 2>who was recovering from a surgical procedure. She said her

0:28:28.567 --> 0:28:31.127
<v Speaker 2>rep stopped the interview early as it became obvious that

0:28:31.167 --> 0:28:33.967
<v Speaker 2>I was fading, especially on this as the subject matter

0:28:34.007 --> 0:28:36.847
<v Speaker 2>became heavier. We asked the interviewer if we could redo

0:28:36.887 --> 0:28:39.287
<v Speaker 2>it another day or do a follow up interview on zoom.

0:28:39.647 --> 0:28:41.927
<v Speaker 2>She assured us it wasn't necessary and that she felt

0:28:41.967 --> 0:28:44.727
<v Speaker 2>it was an emotional and heartfelt interview. We were also

0:28:44.807 --> 0:28:46.647
<v Speaker 2>told that they would edit it and it would be

0:28:46.687 --> 0:28:49.487
<v Speaker 2>a beautiful piece. She's worked with people lots of times.

0:28:49.487 --> 0:28:52.287
<v Speaker 2>As we've said. She also said grief looks different on everyone.

0:28:52.487 --> 0:28:54.847
<v Speaker 2>Whether or not I'm on medication is none of anyone's

0:28:54.887 --> 0:28:57.607
<v Speaker 2>business and is between me and my doctor. I'm doing

0:28:57.727 --> 0:29:00.087
<v Speaker 2>interviews to promote my new film because I'm proud of it.

0:29:00.127 --> 0:29:02.727
<v Speaker 2>The real issue here is the toxicity of social media

0:29:03.007 --> 0:29:06.287
<v Speaker 2>and a news cycle driven by clickbait. As we record

0:29:06.327 --> 0:29:09.167
<v Speaker 2>the show, the interview is still up on People. So

0:29:10.087 --> 0:29:14.087
<v Speaker 2>despite growing calls for its removal, Jesse should it stay.

0:29:14.247 --> 0:29:17.007
<v Speaker 4>On the cover of People magazine. It's a picture of

0:29:17.247 --> 0:29:20.087
<v Speaker 4>her looking really great in this picture, and it comes

0:29:20.087 --> 0:29:23.047
<v Speaker 4>with the text I'm starting to feel like myself again.

0:29:23.687 --> 0:29:26.927
<v Speaker 4>So people probably knew that there was going to be

0:29:26.967 --> 0:29:30.327
<v Speaker 4>a stark contrast between what she was saying and how

0:29:30.367 --> 0:29:36.127
<v Speaker 4>she was coming across. I do think that speculating about

0:29:36.287 --> 0:29:39.767
<v Speaker 4>what she was potentially on isn't very helpful, because I

0:29:39.807 --> 0:29:42.727
<v Speaker 4>also know that there are a lot of medications for

0:29:42.927 --> 0:29:45.967
<v Speaker 4>mental health issues that can have those same side effects.

0:29:46.047 --> 0:29:49.727
<v Speaker 4>Because she was slurring, she appeared a bit foggy, and

0:29:50.007 --> 0:29:51.847
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I've had that experience if you're trying to

0:29:51.847 --> 0:29:54.127
<v Speaker 4>get your dosage right or whatever. The people I look

0:29:54.127 --> 0:29:57.327
<v Speaker 4>at in this story and go what were you thinking?

0:29:57.407 --> 0:30:00.327
<v Speaker 4>I just had people. It's like, there should be people

0:30:00.327 --> 0:30:03.607
<v Speaker 4>in the room looking out for you, and within five minutes,

0:30:04.207 --> 0:30:05.807
<v Speaker 4>if it's not going how you want it, to go,

0:30:05.927 --> 0:30:09.647
<v Speaker 4>pull the plug. If she wasn't feeling great days up

0:30:09.647 --> 0:30:12.727
<v Speaker 4>to it, paul the plug. But they clearly didn't do

0:30:12.767 --> 0:30:14.447
<v Speaker 4>that until it was too late.

0:30:14.847 --> 0:30:17.327
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm really torn about this because you know what

0:30:17.407 --> 0:30:20.767
<v Speaker 1>I think about it's not the media's role to protect people,

0:30:21.367 --> 0:30:25.327
<v Speaker 1>people who are wealthy and famous, and that's not the

0:30:25.367 --> 0:30:27.407
<v Speaker 1>media's job. It's not to be their publicist, it's not

0:30:27.447 --> 0:30:28.287
<v Speaker 1>to be their mother.

0:30:28.407 --> 0:30:30.127
<v Speaker 4>Especially when they want to speak. And this is a

0:30:30.207 --> 0:30:32.247
<v Speaker 4>mass of difference with Andrew O'Keefe, which we were talking

0:30:32.247 --> 0:30:34.687
<v Speaker 4>about last week, is that he's not saying, hey, listen

0:30:34.687 --> 0:30:38.287
<v Speaker 4>to me, give me a microphone. He's being stalked by paparazzi.

0:30:38.367 --> 0:30:42.327
<v Speaker 4>This was she was fully consenting, fully, I'm ready to

0:30:42.367 --> 0:30:43.087
<v Speaker 4>sit down and talk.

0:30:43.127 --> 0:30:46.367
<v Speaker 1>She's on the publicity trail for this new comeback that

0:30:46.487 --> 0:30:49.207
<v Speaker 1>she's done where she plays a character who tries to

0:30:49.247 --> 0:30:53.847
<v Speaker 1>save a child who's been abducted. But where the tension

0:30:53.927 --> 0:30:56.927
<v Speaker 1>is for me is I watched the whole interview and

0:30:56.967 --> 0:30:58.647
<v Speaker 1>not all of it was about. Her point was that

0:30:58.687 --> 0:31:00.567
<v Speaker 1>it was a heavy subject matter. That's why I was

0:31:00.607 --> 0:31:03.687
<v Speaker 1>seemed upset. I watched the whole interview, which was more

0:31:03.727 --> 0:31:06.327
<v Speaker 1>than ten minutes, and it covered a whole lot of

0:31:06.327 --> 0:31:10.207
<v Speaker 1>different things. She talked about her child, very sad story

0:31:10.247 --> 0:31:13.287
<v Speaker 1>because when her daughter was three, Kaya Hayden went into

0:31:13.327 --> 0:31:17.007
<v Speaker 1>rehab and she'd already split from the child's father at

0:31:17.007 --> 0:31:20.287
<v Speaker 1>that time. He was a hockey player, professional athlete, and

0:31:20.367 --> 0:31:23.647
<v Speaker 1>he took custody and then she ended up losing custody,

0:31:23.647 --> 0:31:25.407
<v Speaker 1>and she said she did a red table talk with

0:31:25.607 --> 0:31:28.367
<v Speaker 1>Jada Pinkett Smith and said, I thought it was just

0:31:28.407 --> 0:31:29.687
<v Speaker 1>going to be temporary, that she was going to go

0:31:29.687 --> 0:31:31.047
<v Speaker 1>and live with her dad, and then it ended up

0:31:31.047 --> 0:31:33.807
<v Speaker 1>being permanent. And so now Kaya lives not in the

0:31:33.887 --> 0:31:36.007
<v Speaker 1>Ukraine but in Europe and has done I think she's

0:31:36.007 --> 0:31:39.967
<v Speaker 1>about nine or ten now. And Hayden talks about her

0:31:40.007 --> 0:31:43.567
<v Speaker 1>also in this interview in a lovely way as a mother,

0:31:43.607 --> 0:31:47.007
<v Speaker 1>but clearly a mother who doesn't live with her child

0:31:47.727 --> 0:31:51.287
<v Speaker 1>and isn't intimately familiar with her child's life and what's

0:31:51.327 --> 0:31:54.727
<v Speaker 1>going on. So that's all just a bit of context,

0:31:54.927 --> 0:31:56.567
<v Speaker 1>and it's true. I went back and looked at some

0:31:56.607 --> 0:31:58.847
<v Speaker 1>other interviews that she'd done in the last few years,

0:31:58.887 --> 0:32:01.967
<v Speaker 1>and she does speak slowly, but this was different. Again,

0:32:02.007 --> 0:32:04.807
<v Speaker 1>the tension in it for me is they did some

0:32:04.887 --> 0:32:08.047
<v Speaker 1>cutaways to vision and photos that they'd done in this

0:32:08.127 --> 0:32:10.367
<v Speaker 1>shoot before the interview. She said in her statement it

0:32:10.367 --> 0:32:13.447
<v Speaker 1>was an eight hour shoot, and then I did the interview, right,

0:32:13.527 --> 0:32:16.847
<v Speaker 1>which tells you a lot. Right, Let's talk to someone

0:32:16.927 --> 0:32:18.447
<v Speaker 1>for an hour at the end of the day, but

0:32:18.487 --> 0:32:22.327
<v Speaker 1>we're going to spend eight hours photographing them. And I

0:32:22.367 --> 0:32:25.807
<v Speaker 1>feel hadn't have listened to what she was saying, and

0:32:25.847 --> 0:32:31.207
<v Speaker 1>you hadn't seen that video. She looked immaculate, she looked glamorous,

0:32:31.287 --> 0:32:35.287
<v Speaker 1>she looked beautiful skin, she had glamorous hair. Like again,

0:32:35.527 --> 0:32:38.767
<v Speaker 1>what is the media's role to help make this artifice

0:32:38.807 --> 0:32:43.807
<v Speaker 1>that she's completely fine? To me, this interview is just

0:32:43.927 --> 0:32:47.887
<v Speaker 1>filled in some of the nuance that recovery in grief

0:32:48.007 --> 0:32:50.367
<v Speaker 1>is not linear. It's not you know, as we saw

0:32:50.407 --> 0:32:54.127
<v Speaker 1>with Matthew Perry, right, Like the trouble is when you're

0:32:54.127 --> 0:32:58.887
<v Speaker 1>famous and you have addiction issues, you need to have

0:32:59.167 --> 0:33:02.847
<v Speaker 1>the redemption arc of I was addicted and now I'm not.

0:33:02.967 --> 0:33:05.607
<v Speaker 1>And that's what Matthew Perry had with his memoir, and

0:33:05.687 --> 0:33:08.967
<v Speaker 1>he's how come back and it's often not. Sometimes it is,

0:33:09.007 --> 0:33:12.447
<v Speaker 1>but often not. And yet that is the only narrative

0:33:12.487 --> 0:33:15.967
<v Speaker 1>that we will accept. And so it turns out that

0:33:16.127 --> 0:33:19.727
<v Speaker 1>Matthew Perry was not sober when he was promoting that memoir.

0:33:19.807 --> 0:33:23.087
<v Speaker 1>He was already back, you know, addicted to ketamine and

0:33:23.207 --> 0:33:26.447
<v Speaker 1>taking drugs and spiraling back into addiction. But he was

0:33:26.487 --> 0:33:29.047
<v Speaker 1>out there talking about it, kind of being behind him,

0:33:29.167 --> 0:33:32.287
<v Speaker 1>because that's what we insist on. People Magazine is not

0:33:32.327 --> 0:33:36.647
<v Speaker 1>a gossipy title. They always work very much on the

0:33:36.727 --> 0:33:38.927
<v Speaker 1>side of the star, on the side of publicists.

0:33:38.927 --> 0:33:40.807
<v Speaker 2>She would have had approven so I think not on

0:33:40.847 --> 0:33:42.567
<v Speaker 2>that video she said you didn't, but she might have

0:33:42.567 --> 0:33:43.767
<v Speaker 2>had approval on the cover, no.

0:33:43.807 --> 0:33:47.007
<v Speaker 1>Question, probably in some ways. I mean, People Magazine is

0:33:47.047 --> 0:33:50.807
<v Speaker 1>also when Britney spears memoir came out, they did the

0:33:50.847 --> 0:33:55.047
<v Speaker 1>whole photo shoot with Britney, no interview, no video. So

0:33:55.087 --> 0:33:59.367
<v Speaker 1>it's like, are they enablers to help rehabilitate the image

0:33:59.407 --> 0:34:03.207
<v Speaker 1>of these stars or are they It's a fine line.

0:34:03.247 --> 0:34:05.167
<v Speaker 2>It's interesting when I used to work, I don't know

0:34:05.167 --> 0:34:08.047
<v Speaker 2>the answer and gossip mags if you wanted the interview

0:34:08.647 --> 0:34:10.487
<v Speaker 2>with the Red Ark of I used to have post

0:34:10.527 --> 0:34:13.287
<v Speaker 2>lital depression, or my marriage broke down or whatever, you

0:34:13.367 --> 0:34:16.007
<v Speaker 2>absolutely agreed to picture approval. They would have one hundred

0:34:16.007 --> 0:34:18.527
<v Speaker 2>percent agreed to picture approval. That's why the image on

0:34:18.527 --> 0:34:22.967
<v Speaker 2>the cover looks so perfect. Video and audio and releasing

0:34:23.007 --> 0:34:26.207
<v Speaker 2>the video and audio has changed that game, right, because

0:34:26.767 --> 0:34:30.207
<v Speaker 2>it's very unlikely that her people had approval of that.

0:34:30.527 --> 0:34:33.007
<v Speaker 2>If they had, then massive miss to let it go out,

0:34:33.527 --> 0:34:36.847
<v Speaker 2>because this was probably inevitable the way that we pick apart.

0:34:36.607 --> 0:34:38.487
<v Speaker 1>They would have been in the room when the interviews happened.

0:34:38.567 --> 0:34:41.087
<v Speaker 4>They would That's what I can't understand. Why you wouldn't

0:34:41.687 --> 0:34:42.807
<v Speaker 4>jump up and say.

0:34:43.087 --> 0:34:47.287
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, says once the cameras are rolling, that then becomes yeah.

0:34:47.327 --> 0:34:49.567
<v Speaker 2>But she says that her people did stop it, but

0:34:49.607 --> 0:34:52.007
<v Speaker 2>that they were assured by people that they would handle

0:34:52.007 --> 0:34:56.687
<v Speaker 2>little sensitively. As Mia says, it's not in People Magazine's

0:34:56.687 --> 0:35:00.167
<v Speaker 2>interest to gotcha celebrities because they are the mouthpiece. They're

0:35:00.207 --> 0:35:03.127
<v Speaker 2>the mouthpiece for Harry and Meghan, because they're generally friendly,

0:35:03.167 --> 0:35:05.767
<v Speaker 2>they offer approval, They work very tightly with Hollywood.

0:35:05.407 --> 0:35:08.047
<v Speaker 1>Agents, so kind of like the Women's Weekly use.

0:35:08.167 --> 0:35:11.847
<v Speaker 2>Yes, it's interesting that this was allowed to go out,

0:35:11.887 --> 0:35:12.847
<v Speaker 2>would you have published it?

0:35:13.567 --> 0:35:15.687
<v Speaker 4>You do a no filter with someone and this is

0:35:15.727 --> 0:35:18.487
<v Speaker 4>how no I mean, this is complicated. But they come

0:35:18.527 --> 0:35:23.327
<v Speaker 4>and they're slurring or they're not, they're best selves, which

0:35:23.367 --> 0:35:24.287
<v Speaker 4>props really.

0:35:24.087 --> 0:35:28.087
<v Speaker 1>Tricky because occasionally I have not published a no filter.

0:35:28.167 --> 0:35:30.447
<v Speaker 1>They've been about two times when I've done that to

0:35:30.527 --> 0:35:32.607
<v Speaker 1>protect the person because I didn't think they were in

0:35:32.647 --> 0:35:35.487
<v Speaker 1>the state to do the interview. But they were not

0:35:35.927 --> 0:35:41.767
<v Speaker 1>big Hollywood stars with publicists and teams who had conspireds

0:35:41.767 --> 0:35:44.327
<v Speaker 1>makes it sounds interstuff, but who had participated in an

0:35:44.367 --> 0:35:48.367
<v Speaker 1>eight hour shoot and was publicizing a movie and contractually

0:35:48.367 --> 0:35:51.847
<v Speaker 1>obliged to publicize a movie. It's interesting to know also,

0:35:51.887 --> 0:35:54.767
<v Speaker 1>who wants her to come back. She probably wants to

0:35:54.767 --> 0:35:56.607
<v Speaker 1>come back. She's got to earn money. She's got to

0:35:56.607 --> 0:35:58.407
<v Speaker 1>earn money. She hasn't no money in a long time.

0:35:59.087 --> 0:36:01.207
<v Speaker 1>It's just one of those heartbreaking stories that I don't

0:36:01.207 --> 0:36:03.207
<v Speaker 1>think there is a bad guy in this. I think

0:36:03.247 --> 0:36:05.567
<v Speaker 1>it's you know, it's a story about addiction. It's like

0:36:05.607 --> 0:36:09.767
<v Speaker 1>Britney Spears. If you go and look at Hayden's Instagram again,

0:36:09.927 --> 0:36:12.247
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if she's publishing it. She doesn't publish video,

0:36:12.367 --> 0:36:16.007
<v Speaker 1>she only publishes stills, but the captions are eerily reminiscent

0:36:16.047 --> 0:36:19.047
<v Speaker 1>of Britney Spears. It's like that very childlike way of

0:36:19.167 --> 0:36:23.207
<v Speaker 1>talking doesn't sound like a grown woman who's in control

0:36:23.247 --> 0:36:24.367
<v Speaker 1>of what's going on in a lite.

0:36:24.407 --> 0:36:26.727
<v Speaker 2>I think the fact that there was such a pushback

0:36:26.767 --> 0:36:32.247
<v Speaker 2>on people shows increased media literacy, shows increased understanding of

0:36:32.367 --> 0:36:36.407
<v Speaker 2>mental health and addiction, and shows that the narrative from

0:36:36.447 --> 0:36:40.207
<v Speaker 2>a different generation about the fact that st Britney spears,

0:36:40.247 --> 0:36:41.487
<v Speaker 2>for example, as a victim.

0:36:41.847 --> 0:36:43.407
<v Speaker 1>So what are we saying? We just want the fake?

0:36:43.607 --> 0:36:47.047
<v Speaker 2>I think people think it's exploitative if somebody is not

0:36:47.687 --> 0:36:49.367
<v Speaker 2>in the right frame of mind to be able to

0:36:49.367 --> 0:36:52.047
<v Speaker 2>do that. To show that to everybody is exploitative. Whether

0:36:52.127 --> 0:36:53.567
<v Speaker 2>or not it is, I'm with you, I'm kind of

0:36:53.567 --> 0:36:54.167
<v Speaker 2>on the fence.

0:36:54.687 --> 0:36:57.127
<v Speaker 1>Showing reality is exploited in well.

0:36:57.167 --> 0:37:01.687
<v Speaker 2>It also shows the massive gap between as you've brilliantly expressed,

0:37:01.967 --> 0:37:05.847
<v Speaker 2>the massive gap between the image that's being presented. But

0:37:05.927 --> 0:37:08.207
<v Speaker 2>then don't we all want to put forward our best

0:37:08.247 --> 0:37:10.807
<v Speaker 2>image a lot of the time. I don't mean necessarily literally,

0:37:10.847 --> 0:37:12.887
<v Speaker 2>but do we all want everybody rummaging around?

0:37:12.887 --> 0:37:16.567
<v Speaker 1>How much does how much agency does a thirty five

0:37:16.647 --> 0:37:20.807
<v Speaker 1>year old woman with a team of managers, agents, publicists, wardrobe,

0:37:20.807 --> 0:37:23.807
<v Speaker 1>hair and makeer, you know, personal trainers, or how much

0:37:24.047 --> 0:37:27.647
<v Speaker 1>agency and responsibility does she have to take for you

0:37:27.647 --> 0:37:29.527
<v Speaker 1>know what, guys, let's do the interview at the beginning

0:37:29.527 --> 0:37:31.767
<v Speaker 1>of the day, or I'm just not going to do

0:37:31.847 --> 0:37:33.887
<v Speaker 1>this and you know I've been on shoots. It can

0:37:34.127 --> 0:37:36.487
<v Speaker 1>I'm not like that, but it can be hard. But

0:37:36.527 --> 0:37:40.247
<v Speaker 1>you do have some agency. It's not the publications job

0:37:40.367 --> 0:37:43.927
<v Speaker 1>or the media organization's job to take care of you

0:37:44.407 --> 0:37:47.967
<v Speaker 1>or to make you look away. That's not true. It's tricky.

0:37:48.727 --> 0:37:50.647
<v Speaker 2>Look, that was going to be all we had time for.

0:37:50.727 --> 0:37:52.967
<v Speaker 2>But there's an urgent question I have for me in

0:37:53.007 --> 0:37:56.247
<v Speaker 2>case you missed it. Barrel jeans are a big thing

0:37:56.487 --> 0:37:59.447
<v Speaker 2>at the moment, which are well mia explained to us

0:37:59.487 --> 0:38:03.647
<v Speaker 2>in your fashion language. What barrel jeans are disgusting. They

0:38:03.687 --> 0:38:07.087
<v Speaker 2>are hyper wide leg but not just wide leg jeans

0:38:07.487 --> 0:38:09.247
<v Speaker 2>in like a normal wide leg way. They kind of

0:38:09.487 --> 0:38:11.287
<v Speaker 2>almost balloon out.

0:38:11.047 --> 0:38:12.687
<v Speaker 3>Don't imagine we've.

0:38:12.527 --> 0:38:14.487
<v Speaker 1>Been riding a horse for one hundred years.

0:38:14.807 --> 0:38:17.807
<v Speaker 4>You know, when you stand on like an air gust

0:38:18.127 --> 0:38:19.887
<v Speaker 4>and like you've got jeans on and it makes you

0:38:19.927 --> 0:38:21.887
<v Speaker 4>go puff out at the knees and you look really silly.

0:38:22.007 --> 0:38:24.847
<v Speaker 1>Yes, So if you're standing straight with your ankles together,

0:38:25.047 --> 0:38:28.527
<v Speaker 1>imagine an oval shape from your hips to your ankles.

0:38:28.607 --> 0:38:31.167
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, like you're standing in a circle. So kind of

0:38:31.247 --> 0:38:33.687
<v Speaker 2>And the thing that I want to know because apparently

0:38:33.767 --> 0:38:35.447
<v Speaker 2>so in case you missed everybody, they're a big thing.

0:38:35.527 --> 0:38:38.287
<v Speaker 2>You'll look around and you will see them. But Mia

0:38:38.487 --> 0:38:41.327
<v Speaker 2>has not yet embraced this trend. Now we know that

0:38:41.407 --> 0:38:44.727
<v Speaker 2>Mia jumps on most trends. Last week we did post

0:38:44.767 --> 0:38:48.767
<v Speaker 2>those ridiculous see through sockey jewelry things she's wearing. Pretty

0:38:48.807 --> 0:38:50.407
<v Speaker 2>a lot of people just said to me in my

0:38:50.567 --> 0:38:53.087
<v Speaker 2>DMS and Instagram like WTF.

0:38:53.087 --> 0:38:55.887
<v Speaker 1>One person said, please Holly stop referring to mea as

0:38:55.887 --> 0:38:59.887
<v Speaker 1>the fashion person because her style is appalling. But why

0:38:59.927 --> 0:39:02.127
<v Speaker 1>have you not yet worn these jeans because I think

0:39:02.127 --> 0:39:02.887
<v Speaker 1>they're repulsive?

0:39:03.047 --> 0:39:04.527
<v Speaker 2>How long do you think you're going to think that?

0:39:04.607 --> 0:39:08.407
<v Speaker 1>For Well, I've been looking at them, never once been tempted.

0:39:08.447 --> 0:39:10.487
<v Speaker 1>Because you're right, I offer and will think, oh that's

0:39:10.527 --> 0:39:13.247
<v Speaker 1>a look that I will never wear, like socks, for example,

0:39:13.527 --> 0:39:16.687
<v Speaker 1>And now look at me go. My eye is very

0:39:16.727 --> 0:39:21.527
<v Speaker 1>suggestible and I will usually adapt to whatever trend is

0:39:21.567 --> 0:39:23.407
<v Speaker 1>out there, because you know, you see it enough times

0:39:23.447 --> 0:39:26.047
<v Speaker 1>and it looks good. But I think it looks terrible.

0:39:26.127 --> 0:39:28.407
<v Speaker 1>And I was thinking that maybe it's because we work

0:39:28.567 --> 0:39:31.087
<v Speaker 1>with a lot of sort of cool younger people here

0:39:31.287 --> 0:39:33.967
<v Speaker 1>at Mamma Mea, and none of them are wearing them.

0:39:34.007 --> 0:39:36.007
<v Speaker 1>So I think maybe if they were all wearing them,

0:39:36.247 --> 0:39:40.567
<v Speaker 1>I'll just find myself dressing by osmosis. Right, whoever's around me,

0:39:40.607 --> 0:39:45.847
<v Speaker 1>I'll start dressing like them, except for you.

0:39:42.887 --> 0:39:46.887
<v Speaker 4>And maybe for us, just a us thing, right, because

0:39:46.887 --> 0:39:48.207
<v Speaker 4>they're going out to fall.

0:39:48.527 --> 0:39:50.287
<v Speaker 1>They've been a barrel jeans have been around for more

0:39:50.287 --> 0:39:52.847
<v Speaker 1>than a year, and they seem to be getting bigger.

0:39:52.967 --> 0:39:56.287
<v Speaker 1>But some people, they look like wearing balloons on your legs.

0:39:56.447 --> 0:39:59.847
<v Speaker 1>I think they're incredibly unflattering. But having said that, I

0:39:59.887 --> 0:40:03.527
<v Speaker 1>don't think wearing flattering things because what does flattering mean anyway?

0:40:03.567 --> 0:40:06.887
<v Speaker 1>Flattering is just a subjective idea. Although to some people

0:40:06.927 --> 0:40:10.487
<v Speaker 1>flattering mean skinny doesn't to me. But I just don't

0:40:10.767 --> 0:40:11.727
<v Speaker 1>like the way they look.

0:40:11.847 --> 0:40:14.287
<v Speaker 2>I think, out louders, what we're going to put a

0:40:14.287 --> 0:40:17.207
<v Speaker 2>picture of barrel jeans on our Instagram feed, and I

0:40:17.247 --> 0:40:18.727
<v Speaker 2>want you to tell us whether or not you think

0:40:18.767 --> 0:40:20.527
<v Speaker 2>Mia should do this. I think all it would take

0:40:20.567 --> 0:40:24.007
<v Speaker 2>actually is for Dolf, our very cool social media producer.

0:40:24.247 --> 0:40:27.047
<v Speaker 2>You can come in a couple of days wearing barrel

0:40:27.127 --> 0:40:29.527
<v Speaker 2>jeans and Maya will be in them. She'll probably have

0:40:29.527 --> 0:40:31.527
<v Speaker 2>them in every different shade.

0:40:31.607 --> 0:40:34.287
<v Speaker 1>I'm really scared that they're going to start looking attractive

0:40:34.327 --> 0:40:36.327
<v Speaker 1>to me. I need to hold this line because I

0:40:36.327 --> 0:40:37.727
<v Speaker 1>don't have many lines.

0:40:37.447 --> 0:40:41.127
<v Speaker 2>That I hold out louders. That's all we've got time

0:40:41.167 --> 0:40:43.727
<v Speaker 2>for on this Monday. Thank you for being here with us.

0:40:43.767 --> 0:40:46.127
<v Speaker 2>We will be back in your ears tomorrow of course.

0:40:46.727 --> 0:40:48.727
<v Speaker 2>And a massive thank you too to our fabulous team

0:40:48.727 --> 0:40:50.727
<v Speaker 2>for helping us put this show together. We'll see it.

0:40:50.927 --> 0:40:51.287
<v Speaker 2>Bye bye.

0:40:52.967 --> 0:40:56.127
<v Speaker 1>Shout out to any Mum and Maya subscribers listening. If

0:40:56.167 --> 0:40:58.767
<v Speaker 1>you love the show and want to support us as well,

0:40:58.967 --> 0:41:01.367
<v Speaker 1>subscribing to Mom and Maya is the very best way

0:41:01.367 --> 0:41:03.887
<v Speaker 1>to do so. There is a link in the episode description.