WEBVTT - WTF Just Happened? The Election, Prince Harry & Nagi

0:00:10.622 --> 0:00:13.342
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to a MoMA Mia podcast.

0:00:13.822 --> 0:00:17.182
<v Speaker 2>Mamma Mia acknowledges the traditional owners of land and waters

0:00:17.222 --> 0:00:22.582
<v Speaker 2>that this podcast is recorded on. Just shush, just stop

0:00:22.782 --> 0:00:25.821
<v Speaker 2>throwing rocks at these people. They have no choices in

0:00:25.862 --> 0:00:28.022
<v Speaker 2>their situation either. The King was born into his role,

0:00:28.062 --> 0:00:30.222
<v Speaker 2>William was born into his. They're trying to do the

0:00:30.222 --> 0:00:32.462
<v Speaker 2>best they can while Harry throws rocks at the boom

0:00:32.622 --> 0:00:34.262
<v Speaker 2>every angle, all the time.

0:00:34.462 --> 0:00:38.781
<v Speaker 3>Dad, King of England, you had me, You knew exactly

0:00:38.902 --> 0:00:41.302
<v Speaker 3>what you were doing when you had two sons, and

0:00:40.862 --> 0:00:42.622
<v Speaker 3>you owe me protection.

0:00:42.742 --> 0:00:43.902
<v Speaker 1>My dad should look after me.

0:00:47.582 --> 0:00:50.742
<v Speaker 2>Hello and welcome to Momma Mia. Out loud, what women

0:00:50.782 --> 0:00:53.582
<v Speaker 2>are actually talking about? On Monday, the fifth of May.

0:00:53.902 --> 0:00:56.782
<v Speaker 2>I'm Holly Wainwright and we are back from the road

0:00:57.262 --> 0:00:58.982
<v Speaker 2>where we were last week when we went to Perth

0:00:59.022 --> 0:01:01.742
<v Speaker 2>to our first live show and get ready friends who

0:01:01.742 --> 0:01:04.622
<v Speaker 2>were coming to the tour because it was a little chaotic,

0:01:04.742 --> 0:01:06.342
<v Speaker 2>wasn't it exceptionally fun?

0:01:06.462 --> 0:01:09.942
<v Speaker 3>Exceptionally fun? There was a costume change backstage. It had

0:01:10.021 --> 0:01:12.902
<v Speaker 3>us all nearly weighing ourselves and I think I came

0:01:12.902 --> 0:01:14.622
<v Speaker 3>out with it on back front. I think they'll be

0:01:14.662 --> 0:01:16.942
<v Speaker 3>a complained, but wear more than they'd bug.

0:01:16.862 --> 0:01:20.382
<v Speaker 1>Yes, exactly right, It's true. Yeah, we were, of course

0:01:20.382 --> 0:01:22.622
<v Speaker 1>in Perth. I'm mere Friedman. By the way, I was

0:01:22.662 --> 0:01:25.301
<v Speaker 1>in Perth with my co hosts and the out Loud

0:01:25.342 --> 0:01:28.542
<v Speaker 1>team and it was so awesome to see all the

0:01:28.542 --> 0:01:31.982
<v Speaker 1>out louders. It was chaos, it was We were a

0:01:32.022 --> 0:01:35.142
<v Speaker 1>little rusty, but we ironed out a lot of the

0:01:35.222 --> 0:01:37.782
<v Speaker 1>kinks pretty quickly except for the end.

0:01:38.302 --> 0:01:43.582
<v Speaker 2>There are a few tickets left for the shows in Brisbane, Sydney, Melbourne.

0:01:43.582 --> 0:01:45.622
<v Speaker 2>Don't at me if they're definitely all gone, but I

0:01:45.622 --> 0:01:47.142
<v Speaker 2>think there are a few left if you want to

0:01:47.142 --> 0:01:48.422
<v Speaker 2>come and see the chaos for yourself.

0:01:48.462 --> 0:01:50.382
<v Speaker 3>And I'm Jesse Stevens and I'll say as well. Another

0:01:50.462 --> 0:01:52.742
<v Speaker 3>highlight from Perth was the life size cutouts that were

0:01:52.742 --> 0:01:55.982
<v Speaker 3>twenty five percent to god, that really tickled.

0:01:56.142 --> 0:01:58.062
<v Speaker 1>I think it was life size for you and Holly.

0:01:58.422 --> 0:01:58.462
<v Speaker 4>No.

0:01:58.582 --> 0:02:01.662
<v Speaker 3>What was weird is that I was abnormally tall compared

0:02:01.662 --> 0:02:04.382
<v Speaker 3>to Holly, who was about half her actual size, and

0:02:04.382 --> 0:02:05.942
<v Speaker 3>you could see out louders getting there and being like,

0:02:05.982 --> 0:02:09.382
<v Speaker 3>they really are shorter than I expected. We are not four.

0:02:09.222 --> 0:02:12.902
<v Speaker 1>Feet Shout out to an out louder city who donated

0:02:12.942 --> 0:02:14.942
<v Speaker 1>her ticket to the show. In Perth to another out

0:02:14.982 --> 0:02:18.262
<v Speaker 1>louder called Megan after she couldn't go. How great are

0:02:18.262 --> 0:02:19.982
<v Speaker 1>out louders. There's a lot going on in the group,

0:02:20.262 --> 0:02:23.182
<v Speaker 1>Tickets being swapped, shared, donated.

0:02:23.462 --> 0:02:26.621
<v Speaker 2>Come come see us on today's show, Down to Business.

0:02:26.662 --> 0:02:30.302
<v Speaker 2>Did something big happen on the weekend? Did it well?

0:02:30.382 --> 0:02:30.622
<v Speaker 4>Yes?

0:02:30.702 --> 0:02:33.782
<v Speaker 2>But do you mean an historic election result that no

0:02:33.822 --> 0:02:37.462
<v Speaker 2>one saw coming? Or do you mean Prince Harry's remarkable

0:02:37.582 --> 0:02:41.022
<v Speaker 2>emotional interview, or do you mean the settling of the

0:02:41.062 --> 0:02:43.702
<v Speaker 2>fallout of the feud between two of the biggest names

0:02:43.702 --> 0:02:46.622
<v Speaker 2>in your kitchen? Whichever one of those, We've got you

0:02:46.782 --> 0:02:50.182
<v Speaker 2>on today's show. But first, a piece of quiet, earth

0:02:50.262 --> 0:02:52.662
<v Speaker 2>shattering scorelous gossip from mere free.

0:02:52.862 --> 0:02:56.942
<v Speaker 1>Brooklyn Beckham the eldest son of David and Victoria Beckham.

0:02:57.662 --> 0:03:01.702
<v Speaker 1>He's twenty six and he was absent from David Beckham's

0:03:01.702 --> 0:03:05.901
<v Speaker 1>fiftieth birthday celebrations, which happened over the weekend. They sort

0:03:05.942 --> 0:03:10.702
<v Speaker 1>of sprawled across different countries. There was various lunches and gatherings,

0:03:10.742 --> 0:03:14.262
<v Speaker 1>but the main party was in London after some earlier

0:03:14.502 --> 0:03:18.822
<v Speaker 1>more intimate family events. Why did Brooklyn miss this? Now

0:03:18.862 --> 0:03:21.062
<v Speaker 1>we know family is very important to the Beckhams, and

0:03:21.142 --> 0:03:24.382
<v Speaker 1>the main reason seems to be the ongoing family tension

0:03:25.022 --> 0:03:29.862
<v Speaker 1>between Brooklyn and his brother Romeo. Romeo's the middle brother.

0:03:30.662 --> 0:03:34.302
<v Speaker 1>Romeo's dating a girl called Kim Turnbull who previously dated

0:03:34.342 --> 0:03:37.662
<v Speaker 1>Brooklyn when he was a teenager, and Brooklyn and his wife,

0:03:37.782 --> 0:03:41.302
<v Speaker 1>Nicola Pelts, prefer to avoid events when Kim is present,

0:03:41.382 --> 0:03:43.142
<v Speaker 1>so it's been rumored for a while that there is

0:03:43.262 --> 0:03:47.102
<v Speaker 1>trouble between the siblings. In the past, it's been rumored

0:03:47.142 --> 0:03:49.982
<v Speaker 1>that there was trouble between Nicola Pelts and Victoria Beckham,

0:03:49.982 --> 0:03:54.102
<v Speaker 1>but they had a few very public shows of strength

0:03:54.142 --> 0:03:55.102
<v Speaker 1>and solidarity.

0:03:55.502 --> 0:03:58.742
<v Speaker 3>I thought that the issue what I was reading was

0:03:58.782 --> 0:04:02.062
<v Speaker 3>that it was Rocco, who's Madonna's child.

0:04:01.942 --> 0:04:04.622
<v Speaker 1>Rocco Richie. He's a side character. I think he might

0:04:04.622 --> 0:04:09.142
<v Speaker 1>have also dated Kim Turnbull, who was Apparently it's been

0:04:09.182 --> 0:04:13.462
<v Speaker 1>reported that Brooklyn and Nicola flew to London to try

0:04:13.502 --> 0:04:15.742
<v Speaker 1>and arrange a private celebration with David. They said, we're

0:04:15.742 --> 0:04:17.421
<v Speaker 1>not going to the main party. We don't want to

0:04:17.421 --> 0:04:21.302
<v Speaker 1>be around Romeo's girlfriend, but we want to see you privately.

0:04:21.861 --> 0:04:24.541
<v Speaker 1>Apparently the family insisted that they attend the main event

0:04:25.022 --> 0:04:27.621
<v Speaker 1>or not see them at all, leading to the couple

0:04:27.662 --> 0:04:30.301
<v Speaker 1>missing the festivities completely. Now, of course you can look

0:04:30.342 --> 0:04:32.782
<v Speaker 1>at Instagram for the real story, and it does seem

0:04:32.821 --> 0:04:35.101
<v Speaker 1>to be there, because Brooklyn and Nicola did not post

0:04:35.181 --> 0:04:38.741
<v Speaker 1>publicly anything about reaching his dad happy Birthday, and the

0:04:38.782 --> 0:04:41.662
<v Speaker 1>Beckhams when they posted some of the gorgeous family photos

0:04:41.702 --> 0:04:44.342
<v Speaker 1>from the night and the festivities, they usually if he's

0:04:44.342 --> 0:04:47.181
<v Speaker 1>not around, will tag Brooklyn and say missing you, Brooklyn.

0:04:47.342 --> 0:04:48.342
<v Speaker 1>No mention of Brooklyn.

0:04:48.421 --> 0:04:51.661
<v Speaker 2>It's really sad because we're talking in a while about

0:04:51.662 --> 0:04:54.741
<v Speaker 2>the royal rift between two famous brothers. But who is

0:04:54.741 --> 0:04:55.261
<v Speaker 2>the real.

0:04:55.142 --> 0:04:56.701
<v Speaker 1>Royalty here for gen X?

0:04:56.741 --> 0:04:59.941
<v Speaker 2>One would argue maybe Posh and becks R indeed, and

0:04:59.981 --> 0:05:03.541
<v Speaker 2>they are such wife guys, those guys like Brooklyn Beckham's

0:05:03.541 --> 0:05:06.222
<v Speaker 2>personality is eighty five percent I love my wife and

0:05:06.381 --> 0:05:08.421
<v Speaker 2>the other fifteen percent is hot sauce.

0:05:08.662 --> 0:05:10.221
<v Speaker 1>So between us two things.

0:05:10.541 --> 0:05:13.981
<v Speaker 2>But it is notable that considering how tight those families

0:05:13.981 --> 0:05:17.382
<v Speaker 2>are like, they are a very tight family. He has

0:05:17.462 --> 0:05:19.741
<v Speaker 2>not posted about his family since Christmas.

0:05:20.061 --> 0:05:23.101
<v Speaker 1>I can't choose who you have children marry, can you, Jesse, No,

0:05:23.222 --> 0:05:23.701
<v Speaker 1>you can't.

0:05:24.181 --> 0:05:27.101
<v Speaker 3>But I did read that in the last eleven family

0:05:27.142 --> 0:05:30.782
<v Speaker 3>gatherings that they've had Brooklyn and Nicola have not attended.

0:05:30.861 --> 0:05:33.541
<v Speaker 3>And my question is why are there's so many family

0:05:33.582 --> 0:05:35.461
<v Speaker 3>gathering eleven love.

0:05:35.702 --> 0:05:39.062
<v Speaker 2>They love a party, they love getting together. This fiftieth

0:05:39.301 --> 0:05:42.301
<v Speaker 2>has had a massive party in London that Tom Cruise

0:05:42.342 --> 0:05:43.902
<v Speaker 2>was there, all these guys and they're in Paris and

0:05:43.902 --> 0:05:45.181
<v Speaker 2>they're doing a big thing in Paris.

0:05:45.181 --> 0:05:46.382
<v Speaker 3>And this was at number four.

0:05:47.222 --> 0:05:49.382
<v Speaker 2>They love a party. When Victoria turned fifty they did

0:05:49.421 --> 0:05:51.461
<v Speaker 2>a similar thing. They love a party, they love a

0:05:51.501 --> 0:05:52.301
<v Speaker 2>family shindig.

0:05:52.741 --> 0:05:56.421
<v Speaker 3>It's David is very much a birthday girly. He's a

0:05:56.462 --> 0:05:59.221
<v Speaker 3>birthday month, massive birthday. He loves a birthday.

0:05:59.262 --> 0:06:00.462
<v Speaker 1>Happy birthday, David.

0:06:00.541 --> 0:06:03.101
<v Speaker 3>And then I also read that Brooklyn did not wish

0:06:03.262 --> 0:06:05.782
<v Speaker 3>Victoria a fifty first happy birthday, and I was like,

0:06:06.061 --> 0:06:08.662
<v Speaker 3>come on, fifty one, I'm sure you turn fifty one

0:06:08.702 --> 0:06:10.262
<v Speaker 3>at one point, I know when it was.

0:06:10.342 --> 0:06:12.222
<v Speaker 1>If it doesn't happen on the graund didn't happen.

0:06:12.902 --> 0:06:18.021
<v Speaker 3>Over the weekend, Australia's election made history. Anthony Albanesi became

0:06:18.061 --> 0:06:20.741
<v Speaker 3>the first Prime minister in two decades to secure a

0:06:20.741 --> 0:06:24.981
<v Speaker 3>second term. The Labor Party saw record lows in polling

0:06:25.022 --> 0:06:27.821
<v Speaker 3>at the start of the year, with Australians struggling with

0:06:27.902 --> 0:06:29.902
<v Speaker 3>things like the cost of living crisis, as well as

0:06:29.981 --> 0:06:34.582
<v Speaker 3>challenges to healthcare and housing. And while many were expecting

0:06:34.621 --> 0:06:39.422
<v Speaker 3>a labor victory, no one predicted a landslide of this magnitude.

0:06:39.662 --> 0:06:43.981
<v Speaker 3>Here is what Alberanesi said during his victory speech today.

0:06:43.702 --> 0:06:52.741
<v Speaker 5>The Australian people have voted for Australian values, for fairness,

0:06:52.902 --> 0:06:58.022
<v Speaker 5>aspiration and opportunity for all. But now that the Australian

0:06:58.061 --> 0:07:01.942
<v Speaker 5>people have made their clear choice, let us all reflect

0:07:02.381 --> 0:07:05.861
<v Speaker 5>on what we have in common. Because no matter who

0:07:06.101 --> 0:07:09.421
<v Speaker 5>you voted for, no matter where you live, no matter

0:07:09.421 --> 0:07:13.182
<v Speaker 5>how how you worship or who you love, whether you

0:07:13.262 --> 0:07:15.941
<v Speaker 5>belong to a culture that has known and cared for

0:07:16.022 --> 0:07:21.342
<v Speaker 5>this great continent for sixty five thousand years, or you

0:07:21.462 --> 0:07:26.141
<v Speaker 5>have chosen our nation as your home and enriched our

0:07:26.262 --> 0:07:31.862
<v Speaker 5>society with your contribution, we are all Australians.

0:07:32.702 --> 0:07:35.062
<v Speaker 3>Look this brings us to the Coalition And while all

0:07:35.062 --> 0:07:37.502
<v Speaker 3>the votes have still not been counted, it looks like

0:07:37.582 --> 0:07:41.302
<v Speaker 3>the Coalition will receive the lowest votes since the Liberal

0:07:41.342 --> 0:07:43.261
<v Speaker 3>Party was formed in nineteen forty four.

0:07:43.542 --> 0:07:45.101
<v Speaker 1>What a great night, not a great navent.

0:07:45.622 --> 0:07:49.302
<v Speaker 3>Peter Dutton lost his seat in Dixon, Queensland after holding

0:07:49.302 --> 0:07:51.622
<v Speaker 3>it for twenty four years. This is what he had

0:07:51.622 --> 0:07:51.982
<v Speaker 3>to say.

0:07:52.381 --> 0:07:54.901
<v Speaker 6>Now, we didn't do well enough during this campaign. That

0:07:55.022 --> 0:07:58.381
<v Speaker 6>much is obvious tonight and I accept full responsibility for that.

0:07:59.302 --> 0:08:02.941
<v Speaker 6>Earlier on I called the Prime Minister to congratulate him

0:08:03.022 --> 0:08:06.862
<v Speaker 6>on his success tonight. It's an historic occasion for the

0:08:06.941 --> 0:08:10.941
<v Speaker 6>Labor Party and we recognize that. Congratulated the Prime Minister

0:08:10.982 --> 0:08:13.381
<v Speaker 6>in which Tea, you and Jody and Nathan all the

0:08:13.462 --> 0:08:15.462
<v Speaker 6>very best. And I said to the Prime Minister that

0:08:15.502 --> 0:08:18.582
<v Speaker 6>his mum would be incredibly proud of his achievement tonight,

0:08:18.622 --> 0:08:20.462
<v Speaker 6>and he should be very proud of what he's achieved.

0:08:20.662 --> 0:08:23.942
<v Speaker 1>That's beautiful, consessions, incredibly gracious.

0:08:24.022 --> 0:08:27.422
<v Speaker 3>Holly. Do you want to just quickly explain what that

0:08:27.502 --> 0:08:29.302
<v Speaker 3>means for people who might have missed it in terms

0:08:29.302 --> 0:08:31.782
<v Speaker 3>of Dutton losing not only the election but losing his seat.

0:08:31.821 --> 0:08:32.102
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:08:32.142 --> 0:08:35.342
<v Speaker 2>So, very often the leader of a big political party

0:08:35.342 --> 0:08:38.102
<v Speaker 2>will have a pretty safe seat. But actually Dutton's seat

0:08:38.142 --> 0:08:40.502
<v Speaker 2>of Dixon in Queensland has never been particularly safe. It's

0:08:40.502 --> 0:08:43.782
<v Speaker 2>always had quite a type margin. However, I don't think

0:08:43.782 --> 0:08:45.822
<v Speaker 2>anybody thought he was going to lose it, apart from

0:08:45.862 --> 0:08:49.662
<v Speaker 2>apparently Albo. They were saying on insiders on the ABC yesterday,

0:08:49.742 --> 0:08:52.062
<v Speaker 2>Samantha Maiden was saying that when Albow was on it

0:08:52.662 --> 0:08:55.302
<v Speaker 2>months ago, as the campaign has been announced, he kind

0:08:55.342 --> 0:08:57.382
<v Speaker 2>of said a little bit off handedly, like keep an

0:08:57.382 --> 0:09:00.502
<v Speaker 2>eye on Dixon, like they obviously thought that it might go,

0:09:00.622 --> 0:09:03.502
<v Speaker 2>but it wasn't being treated seriously in any way by

0:09:03.542 --> 0:09:05.622
<v Speaker 2>the media. And of course, the thing is about a

0:09:05.702 --> 0:09:08.462
<v Speaker 2>leader losing his seat. This means he can't possibly carry

0:09:08.462 --> 0:09:11.982
<v Speaker 2>on as leader because oh he's out of it. He's yeah,

0:09:12.022 --> 0:09:14.902
<v Speaker 2>he's basically no longer the member. And a woman called

0:09:14.942 --> 0:09:17.262
<v Speaker 2>Ali Frantz is now. She has tried to get that

0:09:17.342 --> 0:09:21.342
<v Speaker 2>seat three times. And her speech was also excellent where

0:09:21.382 --> 0:09:23.422
<v Speaker 2>she said that people said it was ungettable, there was

0:09:23.462 --> 0:09:27.102
<v Speaker 2>no way, and she said, yeah nah, those were her words,

0:09:27.462 --> 0:09:28.582
<v Speaker 2>Yeah nah, I'm gonna try.

0:09:28.702 --> 0:09:31.102
<v Speaker 1>She has an extraordinary story. She lost a leg after

0:09:31.142 --> 0:09:34.022
<v Speaker 1>a car accident I think in twenty eleven, and she's

0:09:34.182 --> 0:09:37.542
<v Speaker 1>been a disability advocate since then, and she lost her

0:09:37.582 --> 0:09:42.382
<v Speaker 1>eldest son, Henry last year, and you've got to think

0:09:42.422 --> 0:09:44.822
<v Speaker 1>about what it must have taken for her. She said

0:09:45.342 --> 0:09:48.182
<v Speaker 1>she's thought about him every day in his campaign. It

0:09:48.342 --> 0:09:50.342
<v Speaker 1>was a historic night. The last time that we can

0:09:50.382 --> 0:09:54.942
<v Speaker 1>think about a leader losing his seat was when John

0:09:54.982 --> 0:09:56.862
<v Speaker 1>Howard lost his seat when he was Prime Minister.

0:09:57.142 --> 0:09:59.302
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you know what was good about that. We were

0:09:59.342 --> 0:10:03.262
<v Speaker 2>just all agreeing how gracious that speech was, because you

0:10:03.302 --> 0:10:07.462
<v Speaker 2>can't overestimate how devastating this result is for Dotton personally,

0:10:07.942 --> 0:10:10.982
<v Speaker 2>because he you know, everybody is saying that his campaign

0:10:11.062 --> 0:10:14.782
<v Speaker 2>that he led was disastrous and that Australian people generally

0:10:14.782 --> 0:10:17.582
<v Speaker 2>thought that he was unelectable. He's lost his own seat.

0:10:17.982 --> 0:10:23.102
<v Speaker 2>But he also mentioned Ali Frantz's son in his concession speech.

0:10:23.182 --> 0:10:24.982
<v Speaker 2>I messaged you while we were watching that and I

0:10:25.062 --> 0:10:28.022
<v Speaker 2>was saying, it makes me feel lucky to live in

0:10:28.022 --> 0:10:31.942
<v Speaker 2>Australia because however you feel politically, the fact that speech

0:10:32.022 --> 0:10:34.622
<v Speaker 2>was so gracious in that moment, and also that Albert

0:10:34.622 --> 0:10:37.662
<v Speaker 2>did the same because when he made his acceptance speech

0:10:37.702 --> 0:10:40.382
<v Speaker 2>and you know, he's just been handed a win that

0:10:40.462 --> 0:10:43.862
<v Speaker 2>he didn't see coming, and the crowd started to boo

0:10:43.942 --> 0:10:46.862
<v Speaker 2>Peter Dutton when Albo said Dutton's name, and he stopped

0:10:46.862 --> 0:10:49.542
<v Speaker 2>them and he quite sternly chided them.

0:10:49.582 --> 0:10:53.022
<v Speaker 5>No, what we do in Australia is we treat people

0:10:53.022 --> 0:10:53.742
<v Speaker 5>with respect.

0:10:55.982 --> 0:10:58.702
<v Speaker 2>I felt warm and fuzzy about that because I think

0:10:59.302 --> 0:11:01.542
<v Speaker 2>you know, we talk a lot about the lowering of

0:11:01.582 --> 0:11:03.782
<v Speaker 2>the tone of public debate, we talk a lot about

0:11:03.822 --> 0:11:07.542
<v Speaker 2>the division, and I feel like this election result, but

0:11:07.782 --> 0:11:11.182
<v Speaker 2>modeled by those two speeches in particular, was a rejection

0:11:11.262 --> 0:11:11.502
<v Speaker 2>of that.

0:11:11.822 --> 0:11:12.062
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:11:12.102 --> 0:11:14.542
<v Speaker 3>I felt very grateful that we live in a country

0:11:14.742 --> 0:11:20.062
<v Speaker 3>where both leaders in this case gave humble and considered

0:11:20.102 --> 0:11:22.622
<v Speaker 3>and graceful speeches. Like some people have said that the

0:11:22.662 --> 0:11:25.542
<v Speaker 3>Trump factor clarified a lot of Australians on what they

0:11:25.582 --> 0:11:27.222
<v Speaker 3>want and what they don't want, and that they've kind

0:11:27.222 --> 0:11:30.502
<v Speaker 3>of got conflict fatigue. That's something that Alberanize has been

0:11:30.542 --> 0:11:33.782
<v Speaker 3>working against a lot. But to have Dutton be so

0:11:34.742 --> 0:11:38.382
<v Speaker 3>humble in that loss to accept it, which sounds so basic,

0:11:38.502 --> 0:11:41.622
<v Speaker 3>but I think that that was that was really moving.

0:11:41.862 --> 0:11:44.502
<v Speaker 3>We're at a point now where the Liberal Party need

0:11:44.542 --> 0:11:46.942
<v Speaker 3>a new leader, they need an internal review and a

0:11:46.942 --> 0:11:49.902
<v Speaker 3>total party reset. And look, we of course know that

0:11:49.942 --> 0:11:52.422
<v Speaker 3>out louders voted all sorts of ways for all sorts

0:11:52.462 --> 0:11:55.942
<v Speaker 3>of different reasons, and we're not here to shame anyone

0:11:56.142 --> 0:11:58.822
<v Speaker 3>or comment on anyone's vote. But the facts are the facts.

0:11:59.222 --> 0:12:01.222
<v Speaker 3>Mea what happened, because at the.

0:12:01.182 --> 0:12:04.342
<v Speaker 1>Start of the year, the odds were that Dutton was

0:12:04.342 --> 0:12:05.942
<v Speaker 1>going to be the next prime minister. I mean that's

0:12:05.942 --> 0:12:08.942
<v Speaker 1>what the polling was saying. Alboat had some slips. There

0:12:08.942 --> 0:12:12.302
<v Speaker 1>was a sense of despair within the ALP that they

0:12:12.342 --> 0:12:15.982
<v Speaker 1>were just not ready. But then the campaign started because

0:12:15.982 --> 0:12:18.862
<v Speaker 1>no one expected. When Dutton was first elected as leader

0:12:18.902 --> 0:12:22.662
<v Speaker 1>of the opposition after the last election and Scott Morrison left,

0:12:23.462 --> 0:12:26.182
<v Speaker 1>no one really thought that he had a chance. But

0:12:26.222 --> 0:12:29.742
<v Speaker 1>then he surprised people by being quite a good opposition

0:12:29.862 --> 0:12:33.622
<v Speaker 1>leader in terms of having cut through getting a lot

0:12:33.662 --> 0:12:37.302
<v Speaker 1>of support. And what's been interesting is that there's three

0:12:37.502 --> 0:12:40.422
<v Speaker 1>different roles that you have to play as a politician.

0:12:40.742 --> 0:12:44.502
<v Speaker 1>One is being opposition leader, one is campaigning to be

0:12:44.622 --> 0:12:47.182
<v Speaker 1>the prime minister during an active campaign, and the third

0:12:47.262 --> 0:12:51.142
<v Speaker 1>is actually being prime minister. And some people are better

0:12:51.222 --> 0:12:53.542
<v Speaker 1>in opposition than they are as prime minister, like Tony

0:12:53.542 --> 0:12:57.422
<v Speaker 1>Abbott was quite good in opposition, but not what people

0:12:57.502 --> 0:13:00.582
<v Speaker 1>wanted in a leader. And as soon as the campaign started,

0:13:00.622 --> 0:13:03.542
<v Speaker 1>what's come out in the last forty eight hours is

0:13:03.622 --> 0:13:07.582
<v Speaker 1>how prepared the Labor Party was and how ill prepared

0:13:07.662 --> 0:13:11.902
<v Speaker 1>the Liberal Party was, and they had a lot of time.

0:13:11.942 --> 0:13:14.381
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't a surprise that the election was happening. In fact,

0:13:14.422 --> 0:13:16.182
<v Speaker 1>the election was delayed a little bit because of the

0:13:16.182 --> 0:13:19.662
<v Speaker 1>floods and the cyclone in Queensland. But they had no

0:13:19.782 --> 0:13:25.062
<v Speaker 1>economic policy. They made mistakes in the policies that they announced,

0:13:25.462 --> 0:13:27.462
<v Speaker 1>like the you know, all public servants were going to

0:13:27.502 --> 0:13:29.182
<v Speaker 1>have to work from home. That was an own goal

0:13:29.622 --> 0:13:33.182
<v Speaker 1>that they really couldn't recover from because that was positioned

0:13:33.382 --> 0:13:36.782
<v Speaker 1>smartly by the AOP as being anti women, about being

0:13:36.782 --> 0:13:39.102
<v Speaker 1>a threat to the private sector as well. They had

0:13:39.102 --> 0:13:42.142
<v Speaker 1>to then recount that position and they took a long time.

0:13:42.182 --> 0:13:44.022
<v Speaker 1>You know, the idea that the Liberal government or the

0:13:44.062 --> 0:13:48.262
<v Speaker 1>Liberal Party are the more fiscally responsible ones. They didn't

0:13:48.302 --> 0:13:51.502
<v Speaker 1>really have any vision. They didn't really have any policies,

0:13:51.982 --> 0:13:53.742
<v Speaker 1>and I think a lot of people said that both

0:13:53.742 --> 0:13:57.222
<v Speaker 1>campaigns were pretty uninspiring. But even just the optics, I

0:13:57.222 --> 0:14:01.182
<v Speaker 1>don't think a lot of people could name many Liberal politicians,

0:14:01.582 --> 0:14:04.262
<v Speaker 1>you know, certainly not many women. There are a couple

0:14:04.422 --> 0:14:08.022
<v Speaker 1>Susan Lay, Jane Hume, but they weren't very high profile.

0:14:08.102 --> 0:14:11.502
<v Speaker 1>And friend of the pod At Mortlock, who started a

0:14:11.542 --> 0:14:15.302
<v Speaker 1>network called Hillmer's Network about trying to get more women

0:14:15.342 --> 0:14:18.902
<v Speaker 1>elected to the Liberal Party. You know, she's been sounding

0:14:18.902 --> 0:14:20.462
<v Speaker 1>the alarm for a really long time.

0:14:20.622 --> 0:14:23.062
<v Speaker 3>It felt like that was a very clear message that

0:14:23.102 --> 0:14:25.902
<v Speaker 3>happened when Morrison was you know, kick the Teals came

0:14:26.022 --> 0:14:27.862
<v Speaker 3>and the Teals came in, and it felt as though

0:14:27.862 --> 0:14:29.822
<v Speaker 3>there are a lot of lessons learnt three years ago

0:14:29.902 --> 0:14:31.462
<v Speaker 3>and all of them were forgotten.

0:14:31.662 --> 0:14:34.102
<v Speaker 2>Well, they just weren't picked up. Yeah, because you know,

0:14:34.222 --> 0:14:36.302
<v Speaker 2>you say that the alarm's been sounding in the Liberal

0:14:36.342 --> 0:14:39.582
<v Speaker 2>Party for a while that they need to modernize and

0:14:39.622 --> 0:14:42.582
<v Speaker 2>they need to diversify in terms of who they are.

0:14:43.302 --> 0:14:45.782
<v Speaker 2>And you know a lot of the Teal candidates would

0:14:45.822 --> 0:14:49.142
<v Speaker 2>have been natural Liberals in a slightly different setting and

0:14:49.182 --> 0:14:53.182
<v Speaker 2>they are smart, professional women. They obviously didn't feel they

0:14:53.182 --> 0:14:55.742
<v Speaker 2>had a place there. What the Labor Party would say, though,

0:14:55.822 --> 0:14:58.182
<v Speaker 2>is they would say that they put quotas in place

0:14:58.222 --> 0:15:00.542
<v Speaker 2>a very long time ago, that the Liberal Party have

0:15:00.582 --> 0:15:02.822
<v Speaker 2>always poo pooed and said quotas are not for us.

0:15:03.382 --> 0:15:05.822
<v Speaker 2>And it takes time to pay that off because you

0:15:05.862 --> 0:15:08.342
<v Speaker 2>have to grow a talent bench and they have to mature

0:15:08.382 --> 0:15:11.062
<v Speaker 2>and come to fruition. And now you know, in Queensland

0:15:11.142 --> 0:15:14.422
<v Speaker 2>they've now got six new female Labor MPs. It's amazing,

0:15:14.542 --> 0:15:17.662
<v Speaker 2>you know, there's parity in that party. So I think

0:15:17.742 --> 0:15:20.382
<v Speaker 2>one of the things that happened is that, because you're

0:15:20.422 --> 0:15:22.222
<v Speaker 2>right here that it was a pretty dull campaign in

0:15:22.262 --> 0:15:24.862
<v Speaker 2>many ways. But I think Albo read the mood, and

0:15:25.502 --> 0:15:28.702
<v Speaker 2>the mood is we don't want more division, we don't

0:15:28.742 --> 0:15:32.582
<v Speaker 2>want more rgbardi, we don't want this kind of you know,

0:15:32.662 --> 0:15:34.862
<v Speaker 2>in the final weeks of the campaign, when we talked

0:15:34.862 --> 0:15:37.622
<v Speaker 2>about it last week, suddenly we're talking about welcome to country.

0:15:37.702 --> 0:15:40.742
<v Speaker 2>And in my electra there were posters around and I'm

0:15:40.742 --> 0:15:42.582
<v Speaker 2>sure my electric wasn't the only one. I live in

0:15:42.582 --> 0:15:44.622
<v Speaker 2>a marginal seat in the regions of New South Wales

0:15:45.222 --> 0:15:47.742
<v Speaker 2>Liberal Party posters that were like going woke is sending

0:15:47.822 --> 0:15:50.982
<v Speaker 2>us broke. They were clearly trying to wedge a culture

0:15:51.022 --> 0:15:54.502
<v Speaker 2>war argument that has been working in America and worked

0:15:54.502 --> 0:15:57.662
<v Speaker 2>in various places. But it feels like Australians were like,

0:15:57.862 --> 0:15:59.942
<v Speaker 2>we're not interested in that. Because one of the things

0:15:59.982 --> 0:16:04.502
<v Speaker 2>I find amazing about really decisive election results, it's just

0:16:04.542 --> 0:16:06.742
<v Speaker 2>that idea that all these different people woke up in

0:16:06.782 --> 0:16:09.062
<v Speaker 2>all these different parts of the country in their living room,

0:16:09.062 --> 0:16:10.462
<v Speaker 2>put their song because I want to go to the

0:16:10.502 --> 0:16:14.662
<v Speaker 2>pold and thought the same thing, and they didn't necessarily think, oh,

0:16:14.702 --> 0:16:17.982
<v Speaker 2>We love these guys. They're doing an amazing job. Like

0:16:18.182 --> 0:16:20.862
<v Speaker 2>you know, there's been a lot of obviously disquiet about

0:16:20.862 --> 0:16:23.422
<v Speaker 2>the cost of living and about all kinds of things,

0:16:23.462 --> 0:16:25.582
<v Speaker 2>and from both sides of politics. You know, there are

0:16:25.622 --> 0:16:28.222
<v Speaker 2>plenty of people who don't think labor have differentiated themselves

0:16:28.302 --> 0:16:30.502
<v Speaker 2>enough on environment, on all kinds of issues like that,

0:16:30.782 --> 0:16:33.982
<v Speaker 2>but enough people just went not not what that guy's selling.

0:16:34.622 --> 0:16:37.582
<v Speaker 2>All over the country in all different Democrats didn't make

0:16:37.622 --> 0:16:38.022
<v Speaker 2>it good enough.

0:16:38.862 --> 0:16:42.462
<v Speaker 1>Neither did Trumpet of Patriots. Clive Palmer's party crashed out again,

0:16:42.862 --> 0:16:45.262
<v Speaker 1>like with all that money and all, so did one nation,

0:16:45.702 --> 0:16:47.582
<v Speaker 1>so did one nation, and so did the Greens. No

0:16:47.662 --> 0:16:50.062
<v Speaker 1>seats for the Greens. Adam Bant, the leader could lose

0:16:50.622 --> 0:16:54.382
<v Speaker 1>his seat. The Teals held looks like they'll lose possibly

0:16:54.422 --> 0:16:57.262
<v Speaker 1>lose one in Zoey Daniel and gain one in another seat.

0:16:57.822 --> 0:16:59.542
<v Speaker 1>So there were some upsets. The good news is that

0:16:59.582 --> 0:17:00.502
<v Speaker 1>it was over by eight.

0:17:01.302 --> 0:17:04.342
<v Speaker 3>Sure it was good for those how quickly it was over,

0:17:04.382 --> 0:17:06.782
<v Speaker 3>And I think I agree with you that Dutton. You know,

0:17:06.821 --> 0:17:08.942
<v Speaker 3>there were a few comments about things like hate media,

0:17:08.982 --> 0:17:12.821
<v Speaker 3>which just echoed some trump isms that I think we

0:17:12.862 --> 0:17:13.782
<v Speaker 3>are so sensitive to.

0:17:13.982 --> 0:17:16.061
<v Speaker 1>So it's very centrist, wasn't it in terms of the

0:17:16.742 --> 0:17:19.861
<v Speaker 1>extreme parties on the left and the right. People rejected

0:17:19.901 --> 0:17:23.181
<v Speaker 1>it for being in the center, which is how Australia is.

0:17:23.222 --> 0:17:27.181
<v Speaker 3>And I wonder how much tariffs and some of Trump's

0:17:27.222 --> 0:17:31.381
<v Speaker 3>policies coming into fruition scared people. But I also think

0:17:31.581 --> 0:17:34.982
<v Speaker 3>that there was some foreshadowing about what would happen because

0:17:34.982 --> 0:17:37.101
<v Speaker 3>of what happened in Canada. It's a real reminder of

0:17:37.101 --> 0:17:40.382
<v Speaker 3>how similar we are to Canada, because not only did

0:17:40.422 --> 0:17:42.581
<v Speaker 3>their Left party won the election, I think only a

0:17:42.581 --> 0:17:45.702
<v Speaker 3>week ago, their opposition leader also lost his.

0:17:45.742 --> 0:17:50.341
<v Speaker 1>Seat unexpectedly he was predicted to win, and then Trump

0:17:50.422 --> 0:17:52.262
<v Speaker 1>and all the chaos and everyone went, oh no.

0:17:52.621 --> 0:17:55.941
<v Speaker 3>It feels like the message from Canada and Australia is

0:17:56.141 --> 0:17:59.782
<v Speaker 3>we are not the United States. And I think Australians

0:17:59.821 --> 0:18:00.782
<v Speaker 3>are relieved.

0:18:01.141 --> 0:18:04.382
<v Speaker 2>After the break the story that Australians were really more

0:18:04.422 --> 0:18:07.981
<v Speaker 2>interested in than the election. We're talking, of course about

0:18:08.381 --> 0:18:14.542
<v Speaker 2>Nagi versus books at times. At the end of last week,

0:18:14.581 --> 0:18:17.061
<v Speaker 2>it felt like the big conversation in the country in

0:18:17.182 --> 0:18:20.982
<v Speaker 2>election time was not Dutton or Albow, but was more

0:18:21.061 --> 0:18:24.141
<v Speaker 2>Nagy or Brookie. If you don't know what I'm talking about,

0:18:24.182 --> 0:18:27.742
<v Speaker 2>and I sincerely doubt it. Here's a very top line

0:18:27.742 --> 0:18:30.821
<v Speaker 2>refresher and what happened between two of the biggest names

0:18:30.861 --> 0:18:36.061
<v Speaker 2>in Australian publishing and food last week. Now, I want

0:18:36.061 --> 0:18:37.821
<v Speaker 2>to acknowledge before we get into this that where this

0:18:38.222 --> 0:18:40.861
<v Speaker 2>has gone since the news broke on about Tuesday went

0:18:40.942 --> 0:18:42.421
<v Speaker 2>the last week is it has turned into a bit

0:18:42.462 --> 0:18:44.901
<v Speaker 2>of a toxic internet pylon. We definitely don't want to

0:18:44.942 --> 0:18:47.542
<v Speaker 2>add to that, but it does touch on several big

0:18:47.581 --> 0:18:50.941
<v Speaker 2>themes that are really worth unpacking. I think Nagi Mahashi

0:18:51.101 --> 0:18:53.901
<v Speaker 2>is probably the reason that I and many writers like

0:18:53.982 --> 0:18:56.462
<v Speaker 2>me have a book deal actually, as in that her

0:18:56.502 --> 0:19:01.742
<v Speaker 2>cookbooks as Recipe to Eats are so successful many people

0:19:01.782 --> 0:19:05.462
<v Speaker 2>say that they keep the Australian publishing industry afloat. She's

0:19:05.502 --> 0:19:07.302
<v Speaker 2>not the only one, of course, Brookies books are also

0:19:07.381 --> 0:19:11.861
<v Speaker 2>very successful, and so are several others. Butts is a phenomena.

0:19:11.502 --> 0:19:16.182
<v Speaker 3>And her last book, which was called Tonight, broke industry records.

0:19:16.222 --> 0:19:18.782
<v Speaker 3>It was the talk of the industry because I don't

0:19:18.782 --> 0:19:21.542
<v Speaker 3>think there had ever been a nonfiction book in Australia

0:19:21.581 --> 0:19:22.302
<v Speaker 3>that did what that.

0:19:22.341 --> 0:19:25.341
<v Speaker 2>Yet and the first one Dinner won the Book of

0:19:25.381 --> 0:19:28.141
<v Speaker 2>the Year Award outside Jamie Oliver, like, it's hard to

0:19:28.222 --> 0:19:32.222
<v Speaker 2>overstate how successful Nagi is and how much people love

0:19:32.262 --> 0:19:33.661
<v Speaker 2>her those who don't cook.

0:19:33.901 --> 0:19:34.662
<v Speaker 1>What is special?

0:19:36.942 --> 0:19:39.901
<v Speaker 3>Puts cinnamon on my vegetables and it's really changed my life.

0:19:40.101 --> 0:19:41.422
<v Speaker 3>I think that is her that told me.

0:19:41.381 --> 0:19:43.942
<v Speaker 2>Today be the thing that's great about Nagi. And I've

0:19:43.982 --> 0:19:47.302
<v Speaker 2>recommended her recipes on this show before. It just works.

0:19:47.542 --> 0:19:51.222
<v Speaker 2>So Nagi is known in the food world for being

0:19:51.262 --> 0:19:56.061
<v Speaker 2>a rigorous, rigorous tester. She absolutely walks her talk. She

0:19:56.101 --> 0:19:58.502
<v Speaker 2>doesn't phone anything in. She also has quite a big

0:19:58.542 --> 0:20:00.901
<v Speaker 2>sort of charitable arm to what she does. She provides

0:20:00.942 --> 0:20:05.302
<v Speaker 2>meals to vulnerable and homeless. But her recipes are just solid.

0:20:05.502 --> 0:20:08.782
<v Speaker 2>Her cookbooks are very sensible. They have rules in them

0:20:08.861 --> 0:20:10.862
<v Speaker 2>and they just work. We make lots of Naggi things

0:20:10.942 --> 0:20:11.422
<v Speaker 2>and they go.

0:20:11.462 --> 0:20:13.941
<v Speaker 1>Off when you say that, like does some recipes just

0:20:13.982 --> 0:20:14.462
<v Speaker 1>not work?

0:20:14.581 --> 0:20:14.782
<v Speaker 4>Well?

0:20:14.821 --> 0:20:17.341
<v Speaker 2>You know, if you're a cookbook buyer, there are cookbooks

0:20:17.341 --> 0:20:19.222
<v Speaker 2>you buy because they look nice and you want them

0:20:19.222 --> 0:20:21.262
<v Speaker 2>on your shelf, but you're never going to open them.

0:20:21.141 --> 0:20:27.621
<v Speaker 1>Right, It'll be like reduce this to yeah, a lengu.

0:20:24.942 --> 0:20:31.022
<v Speaker 3>A level, Like I can't cook and I have Naggie

0:20:31.182 --> 0:20:33.382
<v Speaker 3>because I think that she shee will hold her hand.

0:20:33.462 --> 0:20:35.661
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and on a lengy whose recipes are amazing, but

0:20:35.702 --> 0:20:38.101
<v Speaker 2>you have to go and buy twenty five new things,

0:20:38.341 --> 0:20:40.661
<v Speaker 2>you know to make any meal in that book, whereas

0:20:40.782 --> 0:20:42.782
<v Speaker 2>Naggi's much more what have you got in the cupboard?

0:20:43.262 --> 0:20:45.621
<v Speaker 2>Let's make something on a Wednesday at five? You know,

0:20:45.702 --> 0:20:48.861
<v Speaker 2>she's that person dinner exactly, which is why SU's genius.

0:20:49.262 --> 0:20:52.622
<v Speaker 2>Now Brookie, on the other hand, who's also incredibly popular

0:20:52.702 --> 0:20:55.621
<v Speaker 2>and very popular on social on TikTok in particular, she

0:20:55.702 --> 0:20:57.901
<v Speaker 2>has got more of like a retail arm to what

0:20:57.982 --> 0:21:02.181
<v Speaker 2>she does. Right. So brookiees things dessert, particularly cookies and things,

0:21:02.661 --> 0:21:04.581
<v Speaker 2>and she has shops, she has pop up shops, she

0:21:04.621 --> 0:21:07.421
<v Speaker 2>has a cookie delivery business, and she's huge and like

0:21:07.581 --> 0:21:13.742
<v Speaker 2>viral cookie recipes and things. So different, but saying ballpark right. Anyway,

0:21:13.821 --> 0:21:17.061
<v Speaker 2>what happened last week is that Nagi says that brook

0:21:17.141 --> 0:21:21.742
<v Speaker 2>Bellamy plagiarized two of her recipes, notably caramel slice and backlavar.

0:21:22.182 --> 0:21:25.782
<v Speaker 2>She wrote on social media and on her blog about it,

0:21:25.821 --> 0:21:28.742
<v Speaker 2>and this is what she said. When a multimillion dollar

0:21:28.782 --> 0:21:32.141
<v Speaker 2>cookbook by a social media influencer published by a blue

0:21:32.222 --> 0:21:36.021
<v Speaker 2>chip publisher features numerous recipes that in my opinion are

0:21:36.061 --> 0:21:40.302
<v Speaker 2>plagiarized given the detailed and extensive word for words similarity

0:21:40.381 --> 0:21:43.821
<v Speaker 2>to mine and those of other authors. She said this

0:21:43.982 --> 0:21:46.581
<v Speaker 2>wasn't a post she was publishing lightly, that she'd spent

0:21:46.702 --> 0:21:50.021
<v Speaker 2>many sleepless nights freading over it and many hours writing

0:21:50.061 --> 0:21:51.941
<v Speaker 2>it to get it right. She said, I know the

0:21:52.022 --> 0:21:55.101
<v Speaker 2>easiest and safest path would be to stay silent, and

0:21:55.141 --> 0:21:57.221
<v Speaker 2>there's a risk that legal action will be brought against

0:21:57.262 --> 0:22:00.181
<v Speaker 2>me for speaking out. It's daunting to take on a

0:22:00.182 --> 0:22:03.302
<v Speaker 2>major publisher and an influencer with a huge TikTok for

0:22:03.422 --> 0:22:04.821
<v Speaker 2>what do you think she wanted to achieve.

0:22:05.262 --> 0:22:08.902
<v Speaker 3>It's interesting because I wonder if and I'm sure we'll

0:22:08.942 --> 0:22:14.341
<v Speaker 3>get into this, but copyright law around recipes is slippery,

0:22:14.702 --> 0:22:19.221
<v Speaker 3>so to actually copyright your specific recipe, because there are

0:22:19.222 --> 0:22:22.462
<v Speaker 3>only so many ways to make certain things, it's very

0:22:22.462 --> 0:22:24.181
<v Speaker 3>hard to prove in a court of law. What you

0:22:24.302 --> 0:22:28.821
<v Speaker 3>do own is the story around it. The IP is

0:22:28.861 --> 0:22:31.981
<v Speaker 3>about the context that might exist in the book. But

0:22:32.061 --> 0:22:35.902
<v Speaker 3>I think that Nagi probably knew, and she's clearly had

0:22:35.901 --> 0:22:38.702
<v Speaker 3>this issue because she's consulted with lawyers, and I think

0:22:38.742 --> 0:22:42.982
<v Speaker 3>she felt stuck. And what Nagi had was the capital

0:22:43.182 --> 0:22:46.542
<v Speaker 3>of her audience and the people who love what she does.

0:22:47.422 --> 0:22:50.462
<v Speaker 3>A few things. The fact that Brookie's book was selling really,

0:22:50.462 --> 0:22:52.901
<v Speaker 3>really well and that it had made a significant profit

0:22:53.141 --> 0:22:56.581
<v Speaker 3>was one thing. The second, which is just worth noting,

0:22:57.141 --> 0:23:00.222
<v Speaker 3>is that the Australian Book Industry Awards are coming up

0:23:00.262 --> 0:23:02.621
<v Speaker 3>in Melbourne and they are both nominated in the same

0:23:02.661 --> 0:23:05.941
<v Speaker 3>category for Illustrated Book of the Year, which is often

0:23:06.182 --> 0:23:10.101
<v Speaker 3>recipe books. And so I imagine for Nagi if we take

0:23:10.141 --> 0:23:12.782
<v Speaker 3>and of course these allegations we can't prove or disprove,

0:23:12.861 --> 0:23:15.262
<v Speaker 3>but if she's sitting there in Melbourne and you see

0:23:15.262 --> 0:23:17.542
<v Speaker 3>Brookie Winn and you think that she's plagiarized one of

0:23:17.581 --> 0:23:20.221
<v Speaker 3>your recipes, then that would be a hard thing to

0:23:20.222 --> 0:23:23.981
<v Speaker 3>sit with. But I also think that there's something revealing

0:23:24.302 --> 0:23:28.341
<v Speaker 3>in maybe some of Nagi's language, and she refers to

0:23:28.381 --> 0:23:33.381
<v Speaker 3>Brookie immediately as a social media influencer, and I wonder

0:23:33.422 --> 0:23:36.262
<v Speaker 3>if a tension here is between the social media influencer

0:23:36.502 --> 0:23:40.222
<v Speaker 3>and almost the old guard, which Nagi as someone who,

0:23:40.262 --> 0:23:44.261
<v Speaker 3>as you say, she has built this relationship with her

0:23:44.302 --> 0:23:47.861
<v Speaker 3>community and I'm not undermining Brookie at all, but there

0:23:47.982 --> 0:23:53.622
<v Speaker 3>is this influencer subculture that can sometimes feel like they

0:23:53.661 --> 0:23:55.702
<v Speaker 3>click their fingers and decide to move into a certain

0:23:55.742 --> 0:23:59.942
<v Speaker 3>industry like podcasting. And I don't think that is actually

0:23:59.982 --> 0:24:04.542
<v Speaker 3>Brookie because just from what I know, she owns shops.

0:24:04.621 --> 0:24:06.542
<v Speaker 3>As you were saying, she's been doing this for a

0:24:06.581 --> 0:24:09.142
<v Speaker 3>lot of years. She isn't some influencer who's never tried

0:24:09.182 --> 0:24:12.821
<v Speaker 3>to rest. But I do think that the reason this

0:24:13.341 --> 0:24:17.221
<v Speaker 3>has got so much traction is because it's influencer versus

0:24:17.381 --> 0:24:19.661
<v Speaker 3>olgard Like I think that's how we're positioning it.

0:24:19.942 --> 0:24:21.821
<v Speaker 2>This is what the allegations are.

0:24:21.942 --> 0:24:22.102
<v Speaker 4>Now.

0:24:22.182 --> 0:24:25.141
<v Speaker 2>Obviously Brookie has come out and said that absolutely isn't true.

0:24:25.182 --> 0:24:27.342
<v Speaker 2>I didn't plagiarize. She's made the point that it's very

0:24:27.341 --> 0:24:30.341
<v Speaker 2>difficult to differentiate classic recipes from each other, and she

0:24:30.422 --> 0:24:34.222
<v Speaker 2>denies any claims of plagiarism. Of course, right, so that's

0:24:34.222 --> 0:24:34.942
<v Speaker 2>what happened.

0:24:34.982 --> 0:24:38.141
<v Speaker 3>And then someone else came out, and then.

0:24:37.502 --> 0:24:40.461
<v Speaker 2>You know, as the way these stories evolve, now there

0:24:40.462 --> 0:24:42.382
<v Speaker 2>are other people saying there are other things in here

0:24:42.381 --> 0:24:44.421
<v Speaker 2>that were plagiarized, and some people are saying, well, Nagi

0:24:44.502 --> 0:24:47.341
<v Speaker 2>sometimes has helped herself to all like this. It's spiraled

0:24:47.422 --> 0:24:49.861
<v Speaker 2>and spiraled. I'd love to hear from youmir about what

0:24:49.901 --> 0:24:52.902
<v Speaker 2>you think about where it's gone because predictably, and it's

0:24:52.901 --> 0:24:56.221
<v Speaker 2>depressing that this is predictable. This is spiraled into a

0:24:56.262 --> 0:24:59.581
<v Speaker 2>massive pile on death threats, particularly for Brookie in the beginning,

0:24:59.581 --> 0:25:02.061
<v Speaker 2>But it seems that Naggi's also copying a lot of blowback.

0:25:02.101 --> 0:25:04.661
<v Speaker 2>Now a horrible place to be at the bottom of

0:25:04.661 --> 0:25:07.181
<v Speaker 2>a social media pylon. It seems we can't look at

0:25:07.182 --> 0:25:09.502
<v Speaker 2>a story like this without making it incredibly personal.

0:25:09.542 --> 0:25:11.262
<v Speaker 1>Well what happens now?

0:25:11.381 --> 0:25:14.302
<v Speaker 2>And Nagi has posted to say, please stop trolling.

0:25:14.581 --> 0:25:17.701
<v Speaker 1>I know that this is just a very very small

0:25:17.702 --> 0:25:20.421
<v Speaker 1>percentage of people online. I know the majority of people

0:25:20.542 --> 0:25:23.142
<v Speaker 1>are good, fun, normal people.

0:25:24.101 --> 0:25:28.542
<v Speaker 4>You know, share your opinions, have heated debates, support Bookie,

0:25:28.702 --> 0:25:31.982
<v Speaker 4>support me, disagree with both of us, think we're pathetic,

0:25:32.502 --> 0:25:35.742
<v Speaker 4>whatever you want, but keep it respectful.

0:25:36.141 --> 0:25:38.702
<v Speaker 2>Do you think that was inevitable? And what happens now?

0:25:38.942 --> 0:25:41.661
<v Speaker 1>Whenever I feel wronged, the first thing I do is

0:25:41.702 --> 0:25:45.381
<v Speaker 1>go to the group chat, any group chat, and say

0:25:45.422 --> 0:25:48.742
<v Speaker 1>what's happened? And I need people to meet me at

0:25:48.742 --> 0:25:55.461
<v Speaker 1>my level of outrage, frustration, indignation, right, and that is

0:25:55.502 --> 0:25:58.461
<v Speaker 1>all I need And then I calm down, But I

0:25:58.542 --> 0:26:00.542
<v Speaker 1>need them to reflect back at me. So I'm like

0:26:00.621 --> 0:26:02.982
<v Speaker 1>it's not fair, and they're like, that's outrageous. How could

0:26:03.022 --> 0:26:05.782
<v Speaker 1>that happen? The problem is when you do that on

0:26:05.901 --> 0:26:09.381
<v Speaker 1>social you always have to say to yourself, what do

0:26:09.422 --> 0:26:11.462
<v Speaker 1>I want the outcome of this to be? And that's

0:26:11.462 --> 0:26:13.702
<v Speaker 1>why I said to you, Jesse, what did Nagi want

0:26:13.742 --> 0:26:16.181
<v Speaker 1>when she did that? She says she didn't want money.

0:26:16.381 --> 0:26:18.542
<v Speaker 1>Did she want an apology, she wanted to wanted an admission?

0:26:18.621 --> 0:26:21.061
<v Speaker 1>Did she want all of those things. My understanding is

0:26:21.101 --> 0:26:23.222
<v Speaker 1>that Brooki's publisher had already said they're going to change

0:26:23.262 --> 0:26:26.502
<v Speaker 1>the recipes in future issues of the book whatever. But

0:26:27.302 --> 0:26:29.542
<v Speaker 1>the problem when you take it to social and I

0:26:29.581 --> 0:26:32.741
<v Speaker 1>think that is what Nagi wanted. She wanted everybody to

0:26:32.782 --> 0:26:37.182
<v Speaker 1>say this isn't fair, how upsetting, and reflect back to her.

0:26:37.262 --> 0:26:41.061
<v Speaker 1>So she felt seen and heard and understood. But the

0:26:41.101 --> 0:26:42.901
<v Speaker 1>problem is when it's on social and out of the

0:26:42.901 --> 0:26:46.102
<v Speaker 1>group chat, and you're famous and it's someone else famous

0:26:46.141 --> 0:26:49.542
<v Speaker 1>and it's in public, you lose control of it immediately,

0:26:49.861 --> 0:26:52.302
<v Speaker 1>and you lose control of what people say about you,

0:26:52.302 --> 0:26:55.222
<v Speaker 1>You lose control about what people say about the other person.

0:26:56.341 --> 0:26:58.901
<v Speaker 1>It takes on the life of its own. And I

0:26:58.942 --> 0:27:01.861
<v Speaker 1>think that when Nagi then came out and was like,

0:27:01.982 --> 0:27:04.141
<v Speaker 1>I don't want people to troll. This is out of control.

0:27:04.262 --> 0:27:06.542
<v Speaker 1>A lot of people understandably said, what did you think

0:27:06.621 --> 0:27:09.141
<v Speaker 1>was going to happen? And I know that some people

0:27:09.141 --> 0:27:11.821
<v Speaker 1>have said Nagi maybe just doesn't understand social media. I

0:27:11.821 --> 0:27:14.581
<v Speaker 1>don't buy that she's a digital native. She's started on

0:27:14.621 --> 0:27:17.341
<v Speaker 1>a blog, she's smart. I think both of these women

0:27:17.381 --> 0:27:20.061
<v Speaker 1>are smart. I think it's really sad that these two

0:27:20.141 --> 0:27:24.061
<v Speaker 1>incredible business women that this has become the narrative. You

0:27:24.101 --> 0:27:26.461
<v Speaker 1>can't turn off that tap once you turn it on.

0:27:26.502 --> 0:27:28.581
<v Speaker 1>That's why you've got to always be so careful, and

0:27:28.621 --> 0:27:30.341
<v Speaker 1>that's why there have been times when the three of

0:27:30.422 --> 0:27:32.982
<v Speaker 1>us have had to check each other and just go,

0:27:33.462 --> 0:27:36.421
<v Speaker 1>don't post, don't post, don't post, don't say it. I

0:27:36.462 --> 0:27:38.862
<v Speaker 1>know it feels unfair that you've been accused of this thing,

0:27:38.942 --> 0:27:41.861
<v Speaker 1>or that this person's done this thing. Don't say anything,

0:27:41.861 --> 0:27:43.542
<v Speaker 1>because you're just going to make it worse, and that,

0:27:43.742 --> 0:27:45.022
<v Speaker 1>to me, that's what's happened.

0:27:45.302 --> 0:27:47.262
<v Speaker 3>I agree with you. I did see that, and I

0:27:47.341 --> 0:27:50.341
<v Speaker 3>thought we are well acquainted enough with the internet to

0:27:50.462 --> 0:27:52.261
<v Speaker 3>know that death threats were where it's going to go,

0:27:52.782 --> 0:27:54.942
<v Speaker 3>protesting outside that shop, boycotting the.

0:27:54.861 --> 0:27:56.621
<v Speaker 1>Business, abusing the employees.

0:27:56.782 --> 0:27:58.981
<v Speaker 3>Her life was going to be Brookie and the fetal

0:27:59.022 --> 0:28:00.661
<v Speaker 3>position was an inevitability.

0:28:00.821 --> 0:28:03.621
<v Speaker 2>But I think that's what Nagi wanted.

0:28:03.581 --> 0:28:07.022
<v Speaker 3>Yes, okay. And on the other hand, to Nagi's point,

0:28:07.222 --> 0:28:11.102
<v Speaker 3>if you are either of these women, your recipes and

0:28:11.141 --> 0:28:14.702
<v Speaker 3>your work is your entire livelihood. Like Nagi has spent

0:28:15.141 --> 0:28:18.542
<v Speaker 3>the last however many years putting together these recipes, and she,

0:28:18.901 --> 0:28:20.782
<v Speaker 3>I think wanted to draw a line in the sand

0:28:21.182 --> 0:28:23.302
<v Speaker 3>and say I want to have a discussion or I

0:28:23.341 --> 0:28:26.302
<v Speaker 3>want to make a point about ip because I've got

0:28:26.341 --> 0:28:29.341
<v Speaker 3>someone who's just come out of nowhere and taken my recipe.

0:28:29.381 --> 0:28:31.542
<v Speaker 3>I think in a AI climate as well, there's an

0:28:31.661 --> 0:28:35.661
<v Speaker 3>enormous sensitivity among writers about having their work use for

0:28:35.702 --> 0:28:36.942
<v Speaker 3>someone else's profit.

0:28:36.742 --> 0:28:39.701
<v Speaker 1>And chefs will often do a cooks or recipe. Writers

0:28:39.742 --> 0:28:43.462
<v Speaker 1>will often do a hat tip to another person who's

0:28:43.462 --> 0:28:45.942
<v Speaker 1>inspired the recipe or whatever. That's very common. I wonder

0:28:45.982 --> 0:28:50.342
<v Speaker 1>how many enterprising bakers made caramel slices instead of democracy

0:28:50.342 --> 0:28:51.702
<v Speaker 1>sausages for the stalls.

0:28:51.782 --> 0:28:54.062
<v Speaker 3>Oh, there's been a lot on Saturdays, a lot of cravings.

0:28:54.102 --> 0:28:56.661
<v Speaker 3>But I think for those of us who don't understand

0:28:56.942 --> 0:29:00.662
<v Speaker 3>cooking and don't understand recipes. The discovery for me has

0:29:00.702 --> 0:29:03.782
<v Speaker 3>been that recipe books are so much about connection and

0:29:03.862 --> 0:29:07.582
<v Speaker 3>so much about trust and how you feel towards that author,

0:29:07.661 --> 0:29:11.902
<v Speaker 3>and that's been in to Blye and I think irretrievably

0:29:12.142 --> 0:29:13.702
<v Speaker 3>undermined in Brookie's work.

0:29:14.502 --> 0:29:17.701
<v Speaker 1>After the break, Prince Harry has broken his silence again.

0:29:18.102 --> 0:29:21.221
<v Speaker 1>The new interview that came out over the weekend. We

0:29:21.262 --> 0:29:22.262
<v Speaker 1>are going to unpack it.

0:29:22.822 --> 0:29:26.542
<v Speaker 2>One unlimited out loud access. We drop episodes every Tuesday

0:29:26.582 --> 0:29:30.662
<v Speaker 2>and Thursday exclusively for Mamma Mia subscribers. Follow the link

0:29:30.661 --> 0:29:32.421
<v Speaker 2>at the show notes to get us in your ears

0:29:32.702 --> 0:29:35.461
<v Speaker 2>five days a week, and a huge thank you to

0:29:35.622 --> 0:29:40.982
<v Speaker 2>all our current subscribers.

0:29:42.462 --> 0:29:44.661
<v Speaker 1>Prince Harry gave an interview to the BBC over the

0:29:44.702 --> 0:29:49.222
<v Speaker 1>weekend that has been described as heartbreaking, petulant, misguided, seething

0:29:49.862 --> 0:29:53.461
<v Speaker 1>and a really bad idea by anyone who watched it.

0:29:53.542 --> 0:29:55.941
<v Speaker 1>He sort of seems to veer between wanting to punch

0:29:55.982 --> 0:30:00.582
<v Speaker 1>someone and bursting into tears. It followed his loss in

0:30:00.622 --> 0:30:02.862
<v Speaker 1>a Court of appeal case in the UK where he

0:30:03.062 --> 0:30:07.462
<v Speaker 1>sought to reinstate his full publicly funded police protection after

0:30:07.502 --> 0:30:10.181
<v Speaker 1>it was removed when he and Megan step back from

0:30:10.262 --> 0:30:13.022
<v Speaker 1>royal duties in twenty twenty. Here's some of what he

0:30:13.062 --> 0:30:13.542
<v Speaker 1>had to say.

0:30:13.742 --> 0:30:16.941
<v Speaker 7>It is very clear that from twenty twenty, because I

0:30:17.142 --> 0:30:19.782
<v Speaker 7>was no longer allowed an official role, and because I

0:30:19.902 --> 0:30:24.661
<v Speaker 7>decided to remove myself eventually from the institution, that my

0:30:24.742 --> 0:30:28.421
<v Speaker 7>life got devalued from the highest score to the lowest

0:30:28.422 --> 0:30:30.022
<v Speaker 7>score overnight.

0:30:30.302 --> 0:30:31.622
<v Speaker 2>And how does that make you feel?

0:30:31.702 --> 0:30:35.782
<v Speaker 1>Given you have expressed numerous times that you do not

0:30:35.902 --> 0:30:37.942
<v Speaker 1>want history to repeat itself.

0:30:38.262 --> 0:30:40.742
<v Speaker 7>I don't want history to repeat itself. I think there's

0:30:40.742 --> 0:30:42.661
<v Speaker 7>a lot of other people out there, the majority, they

0:30:42.702 --> 0:30:46.501
<v Speaker 7>also don't want history repeat itself. Through the disclosure process,

0:30:46.542 --> 0:30:49.182
<v Speaker 7>I've discovered that some people want history to repeat itself,

0:30:49.222 --> 0:30:52.782
<v Speaker 7>which is pretty dark. I would love reconciliation with my family.

0:30:53.262 --> 0:30:56.022
<v Speaker 7>You know, there's no point in continuing to fight anymore.

0:30:56.182 --> 0:30:59.181
<v Speaker 7>As I said, life is precious. I don't know how

0:30:59.262 --> 0:31:02.302
<v Speaker 7>much longer my father has. You know, he won't speak

0:31:02.302 --> 0:31:03.941
<v Speaker 7>to me because of this security stuff.

0:31:04.022 --> 0:31:07.902
<v Speaker 1>Oh that is so dark. He's, of course, referring to Diana.

0:31:08.062 --> 0:31:12.022
<v Speaker 1>His mother refused her royal security protection because she thought

0:31:12.022 --> 0:31:16.982
<v Speaker 1>that they were spying on her, and that ended obviously tragically.

0:31:17.742 --> 0:31:20.221
<v Speaker 1>The reaction was very swift after the interview, the British

0:31:20.222 --> 0:31:23.822
<v Speaker 1>public overwhelmingly think Harry and Meghan should lose their role titles,

0:31:23.822 --> 0:31:27.142
<v Speaker 1>and Buckingham Palace issued a very blunt statement. They said,

0:31:27.462 --> 0:31:30.742
<v Speaker 1>all of these issues have been examined repeatedly and meticulously

0:31:30.782 --> 0:31:35.022
<v Speaker 1>by the courts, with the same conclusion reached on each occasion.

0:31:35.382 --> 0:31:37.342
<v Speaker 3>I don't get it. I don't get why people are

0:31:37.382 --> 0:31:41.661
<v Speaker 3>so angry.

0:31:39.822 --> 0:31:43.461
<v Speaker 2>Falling off my chair with irritation Harry. One of my

0:31:43.542 --> 0:31:47.582
<v Speaker 2>Roman empires is why Meghan cops all the abuse when

0:31:47.782 --> 0:31:50.822
<v Speaker 2>Harry is just the most entire I'm just going to

0:31:50.862 --> 0:31:55.742
<v Speaker 2>say it, He's just the most entitled winger in public life.

0:31:55.902 --> 0:31:58.942
<v Speaker 2>Like I read a whole book about how hard done

0:31:58.982 --> 0:32:01.582
<v Speaker 2>by he is. It's a very good book. I encourage

0:32:01.582 --> 0:32:04.062
<v Speaker 2>you all to read it. But he just has this

0:32:05.022 --> 0:32:11.782
<v Speaker 2>entire inability to be able to see how unbelievably privileged

0:32:11.822 --> 0:32:15.142
<v Speaker 2>he is, and how every time he puts himself in

0:32:15.182 --> 0:32:17.902
<v Speaker 2>a victim sy over and over and over again. How

0:32:17.942 --> 0:32:20.342
<v Speaker 2>can you sit there and basically say, which is what

0:32:20.382 --> 0:32:23.102
<v Speaker 2>he just did? That my dad doesn't really care if

0:32:23.102 --> 0:32:25.221
<v Speaker 2>I die or if his grandchildren die. He doesn't really care,

0:32:25.342 --> 0:32:26.941
<v Speaker 2>just wants to win. And then in the next breath

0:32:26.982 --> 0:32:29.782
<v Speaker 2>say I'd love a reconciliation. I don't know how much

0:32:29.822 --> 0:32:33.302
<v Speaker 2>time he's got left. It's like you want a reconciliation

0:32:33.622 --> 0:32:35.941
<v Speaker 2>with your family. When you're going on the record on

0:32:35.982 --> 0:32:38.262
<v Speaker 2>the BBC and basically saying that I don't care whether

0:32:38.302 --> 0:32:38.661
<v Speaker 2>or not I do.

0:32:38.782 --> 0:32:41.181
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying it was an establishment stitut that's insane.

0:32:41.622 --> 0:32:44.822
<v Speaker 3>I okay, I did not watch it. I've watched a

0:32:44.822 --> 0:32:49.222
<v Speaker 3>few clips. But I think that the reason we find

0:32:50.302 --> 0:32:53.142
<v Speaker 3>this difficult to watch and the outcry by a lot

0:32:53.142 --> 0:32:55.261
<v Speaker 3>of people is because we're not watching a grown man.

0:32:55.302 --> 0:32:56.622
<v Speaker 3>We're watching a frightened little boy.

0:32:56.782 --> 0:32:59.542
<v Speaker 2>Yes, but that's his problem. He's got a lot of therapy,

0:32:59.742 --> 0:33:00.302
<v Speaker 2>is it.

0:33:02.142 --> 0:33:05.661
<v Speaker 3>Is it a problem that he directly inherited from the

0:33:05.702 --> 0:33:08.862
<v Speaker 3>man who is denying him protection. Like, I think that

0:33:08.902 --> 0:33:12.022
<v Speaker 3>he comes cross as well. I was gonna say paranoid,

0:33:12.022 --> 0:33:13.102
<v Speaker 3>but I think he might have a point.

0:33:13.742 --> 0:33:14.542
<v Speaker 2>He's not paranoid.

0:33:14.622 --> 0:33:16.862
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think that he's right in being terrified about

0:33:16.862 --> 0:33:17.461
<v Speaker 3>his own security.

0:33:17.502 --> 0:33:20.022
<v Speaker 2>But this is this is a point to prove situation right,

0:33:20.022 --> 0:33:22.062
<v Speaker 2>because actually the way things stand is that it's a

0:33:22.062 --> 0:33:24.142
<v Speaker 2>case by case basis on whether or not he will

0:33:24.182 --> 0:33:27.822
<v Speaker 2>get tax payer funded security. Now to be clear on this.

0:33:27.862 --> 0:33:30.502
<v Speaker 2>If people are wondering what the argument's about, Let's say

0:33:30.702 --> 0:33:34.941
<v Speaker 2>that Taylor Swift goes to the UK or anywhere in

0:33:34.982 --> 0:33:38.022
<v Speaker 2>the world, right, she pays for her own security, except

0:33:38.102 --> 0:33:40.462
<v Speaker 2>and Harry brought this up in court, actually that when

0:33:40.502 --> 0:33:42.661
<v Speaker 2>she came to the UK most recently for Eras, she

0:33:42.702 --> 0:33:44.421
<v Speaker 2>did get a little bit of help from the government.

0:33:44.462 --> 0:33:47.421
<v Speaker 2>She did get a bit of like police escort to

0:33:47.702 --> 0:33:50.542
<v Speaker 2>venues and things like that. But in general, high profile,

0:33:51.062 --> 0:33:53.902
<v Speaker 2>rich and famous people pay for their own security. They

0:33:53.902 --> 0:33:56.382
<v Speaker 2>do not expect the governments of the land to do that. Now,

0:33:56.422 --> 0:33:59.342
<v Speaker 2>Harry's point is he's not just rich and famous person,

0:33:59.582 --> 0:34:03.502
<v Speaker 2>he's a royal. He chose not to be a royal.

0:34:03.782 --> 0:34:05.862
<v Speaker 2>He chose to go and make his own money and

0:34:05.862 --> 0:34:08.462
<v Speaker 2>make his fortune. And I'm cheering him on in that because,

0:34:08.661 --> 0:34:11.022
<v Speaker 2>as I've been saying to me last few weeks, one

0:34:11.102 --> 0:34:13.221
<v Speaker 2>thing I learned from all the Megan videos I'm watching

0:34:13.262 --> 0:34:15.262
<v Speaker 2>at the moment is she seems so happy. They built

0:34:15.262 --> 0:34:18.262
<v Speaker 2>a beautiful life, a wonderful life, and they are coining

0:34:18.261 --> 0:34:21.741
<v Speaker 2>it in. He is making handover fist millions of dollars

0:34:21.822 --> 0:34:23.661
<v Speaker 2>here and there. His book is the highest selling non

0:34:23.741 --> 0:34:28.622
<v Speaker 2>fiction book of all time? Why on earth should he

0:34:28.822 --> 0:34:31.142
<v Speaker 2>when he goes to England, not on royal duties, but because,

0:34:31.181 --> 0:34:33.462
<v Speaker 2>as he said, I want to visit my friends. Why

0:34:33.542 --> 0:34:35.661
<v Speaker 2>on earth should taxpayers pay for him?

0:34:35.741 --> 0:34:39.062
<v Speaker 1>Well, the reason is, and he says, when you've got

0:34:39.062 --> 0:34:43.502
<v Speaker 1>official government security, they can have guns, they've got access

0:34:43.502 --> 0:34:46.741
<v Speaker 1>to information and intelligence and I five and all of

0:34:46.781 --> 0:34:49.582
<v Speaker 1>the secret stuff. When you've got private security, they can't

0:34:49.582 --> 0:34:52.741
<v Speaker 1>carry weapons in the UK and they don't have all

0:34:52.781 --> 0:34:55.622
<v Speaker 1>of that intel. The part that I think he's got

0:34:55.661 --> 0:34:58.861
<v Speaker 1>a point about is that he was born as the

0:34:58.862 --> 0:35:00.821
<v Speaker 1>son of the king. And what's interesting to me is

0:35:00.822 --> 0:35:03.822
<v Speaker 1>he never says that, but he implies it. He basically says,

0:35:03.982 --> 0:35:06.221
<v Speaker 1>I was born into this. So the fact that he's

0:35:06.261 --> 0:35:09.542
<v Speaker 1>not doing royal duties anymore and they've moved to the US,

0:35:09.542 --> 0:35:13.502
<v Speaker 1>he's still the son of the king and that can't change.

0:35:13.582 --> 0:35:15.062
<v Speaker 1>And that wasn't something that he chose.

0:35:15.181 --> 0:35:17.741
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, he never chose that he was born into it

0:35:17.781 --> 0:35:20.062
<v Speaker 3>and that will follow him until the day that he dies.

0:35:20.102 --> 0:35:21.982
<v Speaker 3>And he says that him and his family have been

0:35:21.982 --> 0:35:25.742
<v Speaker 3>subjected to well documented neo Nazi and extremist threats, including

0:35:25.741 --> 0:35:28.861
<v Speaker 3>from al Qaeda, and you know, people talk about his

0:35:28.902 --> 0:35:32.022
<v Speaker 3>privilege and not acknowledging his privilege. His mother was killed,

0:35:32.022 --> 0:35:33.741
<v Speaker 3>like his mother died in a way that was very,

0:35:33.822 --> 0:35:36.901
<v Speaker 3>very traumatic for him, and I think that that's something.

0:35:36.701 --> 0:35:39.221
<v Speaker 1>Because of private security, because there was a drunk driver,

0:35:39.462 --> 0:35:40.902
<v Speaker 1>because they didn't know what they would do.

0:35:41.142 --> 0:35:43.462
<v Speaker 3>I think that the emotions. This is a man who

0:35:43.462 --> 0:35:46.862
<v Speaker 3>has just lost a very important court case that clearly

0:35:46.902 --> 0:35:49.942
<v Speaker 3>mattered a lot to him. He's angry, he feels aggrieved,

0:35:49.982 --> 0:35:54.942
<v Speaker 3>he wants justice, and I can appreciate and have empathy

0:35:54.982 --> 0:36:00.381
<v Speaker 3>for all of those feelings alongside wanting reconciliation. He's right

0:36:00.462 --> 0:36:03.301
<v Speaker 3>that one day, of course, King Charles is going to

0:36:03.382 --> 0:36:06.902
<v Speaker 3>die and they're not going to be able to repair

0:36:06.982 --> 0:36:10.781
<v Speaker 3>this broken relationship. But in wanting justice and in speaking out,

0:36:10.781 --> 0:36:12.902
<v Speaker 3>that's obviously it's causing great.

0:36:13.582 --> 0:36:15.462
<v Speaker 2>There is no way, and he says it in this interview.

0:36:15.502 --> 0:36:17.702
<v Speaker 2>He says, they're mad with me because I wrote a book. Yes,

0:36:17.902 --> 0:36:19.742
<v Speaker 2>they are mad with you because he wrote a book,

0:36:19.902 --> 0:36:23.301
<v Speaker 2>but for many other reasons too. How many ways do

0:36:23.382 --> 0:36:27.022
<v Speaker 2>you reject your family and criticize your family and accuse

0:36:27.062 --> 0:36:29.142
<v Speaker 2>them of some of the worst things you could accuse

0:36:29.181 --> 0:36:31.502
<v Speaker 2>a person of not loving their son, not protecting their son,

0:36:31.582 --> 0:36:33.741
<v Speaker 2>throwing you under the bus, doing all these things that

0:36:33.741 --> 0:36:35.942
<v Speaker 2>obviously we don't hear the other side of this story

0:36:36.102 --> 0:36:38.301
<v Speaker 2>because they haven't written their books about it, which that's

0:36:38.342 --> 0:36:41.622
<v Speaker 2>not what royals do. Yeah, but now I'm not a royalist,

0:36:41.741 --> 0:36:43.462
<v Speaker 2>let's be clear. It's not that I'm like, oh, he's

0:36:43.502 --> 0:36:45.982
<v Speaker 2>not behaving like a royal. I just think it is

0:36:46.261 --> 0:36:51.422
<v Speaker 2>unbelievably misguided to just constantly be winging and winging and

0:36:51.462 --> 0:36:54.301
<v Speaker 2>winging about this when he could pay for the best

0:36:54.302 --> 0:36:56.701
<v Speaker 2>private security in the world, and he could also have

0:36:56.741 --> 0:36:59.502
<v Speaker 2>the royal security when he comes on royal duties.

0:37:01.382 --> 0:37:03.742
<v Speaker 1>Not when he goes there. But I mean, his argument

0:37:03.781 --> 0:37:06.462
<v Speaker 1>also is that he's given thirty five years of service,

0:37:07.181 --> 0:37:09.142
<v Speaker 1>including two tools of duty. Now the two tools of

0:37:09.221 --> 0:37:11.462
<v Speaker 1>duty is different thing. I mean, he is a serviceman,

0:37:11.502 --> 0:37:14.261
<v Speaker 1>he went to Afghanistan, but that doesn't entitle you to

0:37:14.302 --> 0:37:17.981
<v Speaker 1>secure to security rights who don't have no exactly veterans don't.

0:37:18.022 --> 0:37:19.941
<v Speaker 1>But a lot of people have said, well, thirty five

0:37:19.982 --> 0:37:22.502
<v Speaker 1>years of what living in palaces and having a very

0:37:22.502 --> 0:37:25.341
<v Speaker 1>indulged life and not having to do that much to

0:37:25.382 --> 0:37:28.661
<v Speaker 1>earn it. But what I see when I watch that,

0:37:28.781 --> 0:37:31.582
<v Speaker 1>it's really typical of some people that I say online

0:37:31.862 --> 0:37:37.221
<v Speaker 1>who claim to be victims and then they do things

0:37:37.382 --> 0:37:40.421
<v Speaker 1>that ensures that they will be attacked and that their

0:37:40.502 --> 0:37:44.181
<v Speaker 1>victim status feels more justified, you know, so that they

0:37:44.221 --> 0:37:48.341
<v Speaker 1>almost like constantly retraumatize himself. So the story he tells

0:37:48.422 --> 0:37:51.861
<v Speaker 1>himself is that his family have rejected him, and he's

0:37:51.942 --> 0:37:55.062
<v Speaker 1>the spare. Literally he's the spare. His brother's going to

0:37:55.062 --> 0:37:57.221
<v Speaker 1>be the king, his dad's already the king, and they

0:37:57.221 --> 0:38:01.341
<v Speaker 1>don't care about him. And then he keeps doing these things,

0:38:01.342 --> 0:38:03.622
<v Speaker 1>like he said, I wanted to keep serving, they wouldn't

0:38:03.701 --> 0:38:08.062
<v Speaker 1>let me. He sounds very childish in the way that

0:38:08.302 --> 0:38:10.502
<v Speaker 1>he's My old therapy would have said, how old do

0:38:10.502 --> 0:38:11.181
<v Speaker 1>you feel right now?

0:38:11.221 --> 0:38:11.461
<v Speaker 4>Pet?

0:38:11.622 --> 0:38:14.062
<v Speaker 1>Yes, But he sounds like a little child going it's

0:38:14.062 --> 0:38:16.341
<v Speaker 1>not fair. Daddy doesn't love me as much as he

0:38:16.382 --> 0:38:16.982
<v Speaker 1>loves William.

0:38:17.062 --> 0:38:19.381
<v Speaker 2>That's exactly what he sounds like. And yet he's made

0:38:19.422 --> 0:38:22.181
<v Speaker 2>a whole documentary series about his mental health. You know,

0:38:22.221 --> 0:38:24.261
<v Speaker 2>we've read about the amount of therapy he's doing and

0:38:24.302 --> 0:38:26.582
<v Speaker 2>how happy he is doing what he's doing. Right now,

0:38:26.622 --> 0:38:30.781
<v Speaker 2>it's like, just shush, just stop throwing rocks at these

0:38:30.862 --> 0:38:33.661
<v Speaker 2>people who have they have no choices in their situation.

0:38:33.741 --> 0:38:35.741
<v Speaker 2>Either the King was born into his role William was

0:38:35.741 --> 0:38:37.821
<v Speaker 2>born into his. They're trying to do the best they

0:38:37.862 --> 0:38:40.622
<v Speaker 2>can while Harry throws rocks at them from every angle

0:38:40.781 --> 0:38:43.981
<v Speaker 2>all the time. Of course, I don't think that he's

0:38:44.062 --> 0:38:46.661
<v Speaker 2>overstating the danger to your point, Jesse, I don't think

0:38:46.701 --> 0:38:50.221
<v Speaker 2>that like he absolutely would be a very high risk

0:38:50.582 --> 0:38:52.701
<v Speaker 2>out in the world. But I just think that the

0:38:52.781 --> 0:38:55.821
<v Speaker 2>idea that the public should pay for it, even though

0:38:55.902 --> 0:38:59.382
<v Speaker 2>I no longer work in a public role, is just

0:38:59.542 --> 0:39:00.741
<v Speaker 2>intensely miscarded.

0:39:01.102 --> 0:39:05.022
<v Speaker 3>I reckon that his anger is saying, Dad, King of England,

0:39:05.502 --> 0:39:08.502
<v Speaker 3>you had me, you knew exactly what you were doing

0:39:08.502 --> 0:39:11.622
<v Speaker 3>when you had two sons, and you owe me protection.

0:39:11.701 --> 0:39:13.502
<v Speaker 3>My dad should look after me. I think that's what

0:39:13.542 --> 0:39:13.941
<v Speaker 3>he's saying.

0:39:14.342 --> 0:39:17.421
<v Speaker 2>We will be arguing about Prince Harry out louders off

0:39:17.462 --> 0:39:19.821
<v Speaker 2>Mike for some time today. I can feel it in

0:39:19.862 --> 0:39:22.981
<v Speaker 2>my waters. Anyway. A massive thank you for being here

0:39:23.022 --> 0:39:25.661
<v Speaker 2>with us on this Monday. We love having you with us.

0:39:25.741 --> 0:39:28.022
<v Speaker 2>A massive thanks to to our fabulous team for putting

0:39:28.022 --> 0:39:28.662
<v Speaker 2>the show together.

0:39:28.781 --> 0:39:30.941
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for having us in Perth. Perth, Yes, and.

0:39:30.902 --> 0:39:32.181
<v Speaker 3>We will see you soon Brisbane.

0:39:32.542 --> 0:39:37.782
<v Speaker 1>Why why shout out to any Muma mia subscribers listening.

0:39:37.942 --> 0:39:40.181
<v Speaker 1>If you love the show and want to support us

0:39:40.261 --> 0:39:43.102
<v Speaker 1>as well, subscribing to MoMA Mia is the very best

0:39:43.102 --> 0:39:44.902
<v Speaker 1>way to do so. There is a link in the

0:39:44.942 --> 0:39:45.862
<v Speaker 1>episode description