WEBVTT - How The Hell Did Trump Win? Mia & Amelia Debrief

0:00:22.170 --> 0:00:26.450
<v Speaker 1>It is okay to feel sad and disappoint it. Well,

0:00:26.490 --> 0:00:30.010
<v Speaker 1>please know what's going to be okay. On the campaign,

0:00:30.210 --> 0:00:34.370
<v Speaker 1>I would often say, when we fight, we win. But

0:00:34.490 --> 0:00:35.210
<v Speaker 1>here's the thing.

0:00:35.370 --> 0:00:36.090
<v Speaker 2>Here's the thing.

0:00:36.770 --> 0:00:38.650
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes the fight takes a while.

0:00:39.890 --> 0:00:41.490
<v Speaker 2>That doesn't mean we won't win.

0:00:41.810 --> 0:00:46.410
<v Speaker 1>And don't you ever listen when anyone tells you something

0:00:46.530 --> 0:00:50.050
<v Speaker 1>is impossible because it has never been done before.

0:00:51.130 --> 0:00:54.810
<v Speaker 3>Hello, out Louders, it's mea Friedman here dropping into your

0:00:54.890 --> 0:00:58.330
<v Speaker 3>feed for a special bonus episode of Mumma mea out

0:00:58.370 --> 0:01:01.730
<v Speaker 3>Loud and thanks to all the out louders who've checked

0:01:01.730 --> 0:01:05.850
<v Speaker 3>on me in the group in my DMS. What a

0:01:05.850 --> 0:01:09.370
<v Speaker 3>week it's been, of course, with the US presidential election.

0:01:09.890 --> 0:01:12.450
<v Speaker 3>This is a special extra episode, so if you're not

0:01:12.570 --> 0:01:15.530
<v Speaker 3>into US politics, don't panic. We will still be coming

0:01:15.530 --> 0:01:19.530
<v Speaker 3>into your ears with a regular news free episode on Friday.

0:01:19.690 --> 0:01:22.050
<v Speaker 3>But we know that so many of you have been

0:01:22.050 --> 0:01:26.850
<v Speaker 3>writing a rollercoaster of emotions, wondering how we landed on

0:01:27.010 --> 0:01:30.210
<v Speaker 3>the news that broke yesterday that Donald Trump has been

0:01:30.250 --> 0:01:33.690
<v Speaker 3>re elected. We've heard you, and that is why today

0:01:34.050 --> 0:01:37.490
<v Speaker 3>Amelia Lester, deputy editor of Foreign Policy Magazine and mum

0:01:37.610 --> 0:01:41.530
<v Speaker 3>Me as US correspondent, has jumped on a call with me.

0:01:42.130 --> 0:01:45.450
<v Speaker 3>I'm in the podcast studio, she's at home, and we

0:01:45.490 --> 0:01:49.450
<v Speaker 3>wanted to help you understand the facts of how we

0:01:49.490 --> 0:01:54.050
<v Speaker 3>got here. First of all, welcome Amelia hashtag Are you okay?

0:01:54.650 --> 0:01:58.770
<v Speaker 2>Hello? I didn't think we'd be talking this soon after

0:01:58.850 --> 0:02:01.930
<v Speaker 2>what happened yesterday, but I'm finding that it's helping to

0:02:02.370 --> 0:02:04.170
<v Speaker 2>sift through the facts a little bit.

0:02:04.370 --> 0:02:06.650
<v Speaker 3>Good because I still haven't looked at a news site

0:02:07.130 --> 0:02:12.170
<v Speaker 3>or a news screen, no news coverage, and I'm getting

0:02:12.210 --> 0:02:16.010
<v Speaker 3>my information exclusively through my group chats, you and my

0:02:16.090 --> 0:02:18.570
<v Speaker 3>other media friends who are feeding me the need to

0:02:18.610 --> 0:02:21.850
<v Speaker 3>know information. Now, as I said on yesterday's episode, we

0:02:21.930 --> 0:02:24.490
<v Speaker 3>unpack the emotions today, we're talking about the facts. Let's

0:02:24.530 --> 0:02:27.050
<v Speaker 3>start with the final vote count. How did it land?

0:02:27.570 --> 0:02:31.170
<v Speaker 2>Well, the votes are still being countered, but it's safe

0:02:31.170 --> 0:02:35.250
<v Speaker 2>to say that this is a resounding victory for Donald Trump.

0:02:35.450 --> 0:02:40.010
<v Speaker 2>He didn't just squeak by. Already, we've discovered that he

0:02:40.050 --> 0:02:43.210
<v Speaker 2>got fewer votes than Joe Biden got in twenty twenty.

0:02:43.290 --> 0:02:47.010
<v Speaker 2>Joe Biden still has the most votes of any presidential

0:02:47.170 --> 0:02:51.530
<v Speaker 2>candidate in history. Turnout is looking lower than twenty twenty two,

0:02:51.650 --> 0:02:55.610
<v Speaker 2>significantly lower. That's not in itself surprising, and twenty twenty

0:02:55.650 --> 0:02:59.210
<v Speaker 2>everyone was at home in their track suit pants. But

0:02:59.330 --> 0:03:03.010
<v Speaker 2>it is interesting, given that the Democrats really hinged this

0:03:03.170 --> 0:03:05.770
<v Speaker 2>election on the idea that it might be the last,

0:03:05.930 --> 0:03:09.050
<v Speaker 2>it's the most important election in US history, it doesn't

0:03:09.050 --> 0:03:13.170
<v Speaker 2>seem like the American people agreed with that definition.

0:03:13.610 --> 0:03:16.210
<v Speaker 3>First of all, none of the polls predicted this. It

0:03:16.290 --> 0:03:19.170
<v Speaker 3>was always meant to be close. Every single poll said

0:03:19.170 --> 0:03:21.050
<v Speaker 3>it was going to be really, really close. So it's

0:03:21.050 --> 0:03:23.570
<v Speaker 3>almost like we were geared up for a result that

0:03:23.650 --> 0:03:26.530
<v Speaker 3>never came, which was either a marginal Trump victory or

0:03:26.570 --> 0:03:31.530
<v Speaker 3>a marginal Kamala Harris victory. A landslide wasn't on many

0:03:31.570 --> 0:03:36.330
<v Speaker 3>people's bingo card, except maybe Donald Trump himself. Would you

0:03:36.330 --> 0:03:38.490
<v Speaker 3>call it a landslide? Is that what happened? And how

0:03:38.530 --> 0:03:39.210
<v Speaker 3>did it happen?

0:03:39.610 --> 0:03:42.810
<v Speaker 2>Yes, it's a landslide. Not only did Trump win the

0:03:42.810 --> 0:03:47.010
<v Speaker 2>White House, Republicans took the Senate from Democrats, and although

0:03:47.050 --> 0:03:50.010
<v Speaker 2>the House is still up for grabs, it looks like

0:03:50.130 --> 0:03:53.570
<v Speaker 2>that they're going to win that too. That's significant because

0:03:53.610 --> 0:03:56.770
<v Speaker 2>if they control all three arms of government, there are

0:03:56.810 --> 0:04:01.210
<v Speaker 2>no checks on Donald Trump in the executive branch. As

0:04:01.250 --> 0:04:05.330
<v Speaker 2>to how it happened. Very simply. Harris didn't win over

0:04:05.530 --> 0:04:08.250
<v Speaker 2>any new groups of voters. This is what I can't

0:04:08.290 --> 0:04:12.010
<v Speaker 2>get over. Not only did she not win over any

0:04:12.010 --> 0:04:15.650
<v Speaker 2>new groups of voters, Trump won new blocks of voters,

0:04:15.970 --> 0:04:19.650
<v Speaker 2>So he won working class Latinos, he won working class

0:04:19.690 --> 0:04:24.210
<v Speaker 2>Black voters. Harris won women by plus three points on Biden.

0:04:24.330 --> 0:04:26.930
<v Speaker 2>That's not very many points, given that we were being

0:04:26.970 --> 0:04:29.770
<v Speaker 2>told that reproductive rights and freedom were on the ballot.

0:04:29.810 --> 0:04:33.930
<v Speaker 2>Here men switched over to Trump in bigger numbers than

0:04:33.970 --> 0:04:37.610
<v Speaker 2>we've ever seen men vote for Republicans before. Young people

0:04:37.770 --> 0:04:42.490
<v Speaker 2>did not show up. Old people did not support Harris

0:04:42.490 --> 0:04:45.770
<v Speaker 2>in the same numbers that they supported Biden in twenty twenty.

0:04:45.890 --> 0:04:48.330
<v Speaker 2>Very simply, if you don't win over any new groups

0:04:48.330 --> 0:04:49.690
<v Speaker 2>of voters, you can't win the election.

0:04:50.290 --> 0:04:52.930
<v Speaker 3>So do you think that it's true that it became

0:04:53.250 --> 0:04:57.010
<v Speaker 3>an election about gender? Did it very much split along

0:04:57.650 --> 0:04:58.930
<v Speaker 3>male female lines?

0:04:59.450 --> 0:04:59.650
<v Speaker 4>No?

0:04:59.850 --> 0:05:03.650
<v Speaker 2>Because if you only see plus three on women voting

0:05:03.850 --> 0:05:07.610
<v Speaker 2>for Harris compared within twenty twenty, that's not an overwhelming

0:05:07.850 --> 0:05:11.010
<v Speaker 2>shift for women. Now, women already vote Democratic much more

0:05:11.010 --> 0:05:13.770
<v Speaker 2>than men do. But I would have expected to see

0:05:13.770 --> 0:05:17.690
<v Speaker 2>a double digit increase, just like the double double digit

0:05:17.770 --> 0:05:21.730
<v Speaker 2>increase in Black men voting for Trump. To see only

0:05:21.810 --> 0:05:25.730
<v Speaker 2>plus three for women just indicates that women didn't care

0:05:25.810 --> 0:05:29.090
<v Speaker 2>as much as we thought that they did. So as

0:05:29.130 --> 0:05:31.290
<v Speaker 2>for whether it's an election on gender, I think I'd

0:05:31.290 --> 0:05:33.730
<v Speaker 2>have to say no. I'd have to say that that

0:05:33.890 --> 0:05:37.450
<v Speaker 2>very diverse coalition that Trump assembled seems to me that

0:05:37.570 --> 0:05:41.250
<v Speaker 2>people were really laser focused on the economy and on

0:05:41.290 --> 0:05:44.090
<v Speaker 2>a sense that they kn't afford their groceries and that

0:05:44.210 --> 0:05:47.450
<v Speaker 2>Joe Biden and everyone around Joe Biden has to go.

0:05:47.810 --> 0:05:50.850
<v Speaker 3>So I want to ask about his misogyny and his

0:05:51.290 --> 0:05:55.970
<v Speaker 3>convictions for sexual assault and his other crimes that are

0:05:56.330 --> 0:05:58.930
<v Speaker 3>in court steal and that he's also been found guilty of.

0:05:59.530 --> 0:06:03.450
<v Speaker 3>Did everybody just ignore that, because it seems like they did.

0:06:03.930 --> 0:06:08.170
<v Speaker 2>Yes. And I had a really crystallizing conversation today with

0:06:08.290 --> 0:06:11.370
<v Speaker 2>a friend who did not vote for Donald Trump, but

0:06:11.530 --> 0:06:16.210
<v Speaker 2>who pointed out to me that Americans have never cared

0:06:16.250 --> 0:06:19.570
<v Speaker 2>about this idea of character in the oval office. That's

0:06:19.690 --> 0:06:22.690
<v Speaker 2>just never been important. And she pointed to Bill Clinton

0:06:22.810 --> 0:06:25.810
<v Speaker 2>as an example. Now, Bill Clinton, I'm not making a

0:06:25.850 --> 0:06:28.570
<v Speaker 2>false equivalence between Bill Clinton and a man who's been

0:06:28.610 --> 0:06:31.930
<v Speaker 2>found liable for sexual assault, which Bill Clinton certainly has not.

0:06:32.490 --> 0:06:35.210
<v Speaker 2>But Bill Clinton has a checkered history with women, I

0:06:35.250 --> 0:06:39.050
<v Speaker 2>think it's safe to say, and he won two terms

0:06:39.090 --> 0:06:42.650
<v Speaker 2>in office. And the reason is because the Democrats kept saying,

0:06:42.850 --> 0:06:46.250
<v Speaker 2>of Trump, look at his rallies. Remember that Harris kept saying,

0:06:46.410 --> 0:06:49.050
<v Speaker 2>look at his rallies, what his rallies. Tim Waltz would

0:06:49.050 --> 0:06:51.850
<v Speaker 2>also this is fine, He's going to do more for us.

0:06:51.890 --> 0:06:55.730
<v Speaker 2>He's going to fix the economy for us. And they

0:06:55.730 --> 0:06:59.130
<v Speaker 2>had this fundamental belief that once Americans find out how

0:06:59.170 --> 0:07:01.810
<v Speaker 2>bad this man is, they won't vote for him. But

0:07:01.890 --> 0:07:03.450
<v Speaker 2>that was misguided.

0:07:03.850 --> 0:07:10.010
<v Speaker 4>So did they actually buy his bullshit about being a

0:07:10.010 --> 0:07:13.410
<v Speaker 4>great businessman despite the fact that he's been declared bankrupt

0:07:13.930 --> 0:07:15.490
<v Speaker 4>many times his businesses have.

0:07:16.290 --> 0:07:20.970
<v Speaker 3>He's essentially a fraud. But did Americans believe that he

0:07:21.290 --> 0:07:25.010
<v Speaker 3>was the master on the Apprentice and that he was

0:07:25.130 --> 0:07:30.010
<v Speaker 3>going to restore America to financial greatness again and put

0:07:30.010 --> 0:07:31.250
<v Speaker 3>more money in their wallets.

0:07:31.770 --> 0:07:36.490
<v Speaker 2>I think that voting is an emotional act, and I'm

0:07:36.570 --> 0:07:38.930
<v Speaker 2>feeling that a lot more in the wake of the

0:07:39.010 --> 0:07:42.930
<v Speaker 2>selection result. I think as journalists we want to search

0:07:43.050 --> 0:07:46.570
<v Speaker 2>for reasons and we want to get inside voters' heads.

0:07:47.330 --> 0:07:49.810
<v Speaker 2>But it turns out that in the privacy of the

0:07:49.890 --> 0:07:53.970
<v Speaker 2>ballot box. People must make decisions based on emotion, because

0:07:54.010 --> 0:07:56.370
<v Speaker 2>you're right that the facts don't point to him being

0:07:56.370 --> 0:07:58.650
<v Speaker 2>a brilliant custodian of the economy. I mean, the stock

0:07:58.730 --> 0:08:00.610
<v Speaker 2>market rode high for the first few years he was

0:08:00.650 --> 0:08:04.210
<v Speaker 2>in office, and then it crashed when COVID came along,

0:08:04.770 --> 0:08:07.290
<v Speaker 2>and then Joe Biden had to spend his four years

0:08:07.290 --> 0:08:10.330
<v Speaker 2>in office getting it back on track. People were angry

0:08:10.330 --> 0:08:14.490
<v Speaker 2>at Joe Biden, they were angry at the post COVID

0:08:14.850 --> 0:08:19.250
<v Speaker 2>economic landscape, and they lashed out. That to me feels right.

0:08:19.330 --> 0:08:22.250
<v Speaker 2>Don't you think It feels like people lashed out rather

0:08:22.290 --> 0:08:26.450
<v Speaker 2>than sat down and read all the New York Times investigations.

0:08:26.890 --> 0:08:30.010
<v Speaker 3>I've been trying to understand whether people voted for something

0:08:30.250 --> 0:08:36.330
<v Speaker 3>or against something else, whether something about Carmela and the

0:08:36.410 --> 0:08:41.570
<v Speaker 3>Democrats and what they were offering people just went absolutely

0:08:41.690 --> 0:08:45.570
<v Speaker 3>not And if so, what was that or was it

0:08:45.730 --> 0:08:49.210
<v Speaker 3>just that Donald Trump was more appealing? And why do

0:08:49.250 --> 0:08:51.050
<v Speaker 3>you think it was a vote against or a vote for.

0:08:51.690 --> 0:08:53.570
<v Speaker 2>I think it was a bit of both. And I

0:08:53.610 --> 0:08:57.970
<v Speaker 2>think remember when Harris took the nomination, I can't really

0:08:58.010 --> 0:09:01.650
<v Speaker 2>say won the nomination, but when Harris was declared the

0:09:01.690 --> 0:09:05.970
<v Speaker 2>presumpt of Democratic nominee, and we talked at them about

0:09:05.970 --> 0:09:09.730
<v Speaker 2>the fact that as a woman, as a woman of color,

0:09:09.770 --> 0:09:12.930
<v Speaker 2>a woman of color from San Francisco, which is the

0:09:12.970 --> 0:09:17.570
<v Speaker 2>most derided city in America in terms of this idea

0:09:17.650 --> 0:09:20.290
<v Speaker 2>that it's a liberal bubble and that it's out of touch.

0:09:20.890 --> 0:09:26.850
<v Speaker 2>She's this liberal San Francisco black woman who has a

0:09:26.930 --> 0:09:31.690
<v Speaker 2>history of locking up black men. That's the way that

0:09:31.730 --> 0:09:34.450
<v Speaker 2>the track record was presented. You have to wonder how

0:09:34.530 --> 0:09:37.130
<v Speaker 2>anyone thought that was ever going to work. In retrospect,

0:09:37.130 --> 0:09:39.650
<v Speaker 2>I look back on it, and I think there was

0:09:39.730 --> 0:09:42.890
<v Speaker 2>a liberal bubble that developed that the party after it

0:09:42.890 --> 0:09:45.050
<v Speaker 2>took them so long to get rid of Joe Biden.

0:09:45.130 --> 0:09:48.970
<v Speaker 2>They were so exhausted they just said Kamala Harris has

0:09:49.010 --> 0:09:51.690
<v Speaker 2>to be the nominee. But they must have been deluded

0:09:51.730 --> 0:09:53.890
<v Speaker 2>to think this would ever work. Do I sound tired

0:09:53.970 --> 0:09:55.090
<v Speaker 2>and cynical?

0:09:55.770 --> 0:09:58.770
<v Speaker 3>Why would any woman vote for Donald Trump? Because many, many,

0:09:58.810 --> 0:09:59.690
<v Speaker 3>many of them did.

0:09:59.930 --> 0:10:02.130
<v Speaker 2>Do you remember that photo that I sent you a

0:10:02.170 --> 0:10:04.770
<v Speaker 2>couple of days ago. It was at one of the

0:10:04.810 --> 0:10:09.810
<v Speaker 2>final Trump rallies, and it was two women, probably forties

0:10:09.850 --> 0:10:12.810
<v Speaker 2>fifties in the front row at the Trump rally. They

0:10:12.810 --> 0:10:15.330
<v Speaker 2>looked like they were at a Taylor's Swift concert, the

0:10:15.490 --> 0:10:19.570
<v Speaker 2>joy and the excitement in their faces and their hands

0:10:19.610 --> 0:10:22.650
<v Speaker 2>outstretched to him. One of them wearing a T shirt

0:10:22.690 --> 0:10:25.810
<v Speaker 2>that says make America Great Again, the other one wearing

0:10:25.850 --> 0:10:28.210
<v Speaker 2>a T shirt that says in the make America Great

0:10:28.210 --> 0:10:34.130
<v Speaker 2>Again font mean tweets. Now, what's that about? Why does

0:10:34.170 --> 0:10:37.970
<v Speaker 2>a woman love the fact that Donald Trump sends mean tweets?

0:10:38.090 --> 0:10:40.210
<v Speaker 2>I don't know what the answer is. What do you

0:10:40.250 --> 0:10:41.330
<v Speaker 2>think the answer is.

0:10:41.770 --> 0:10:45.290
<v Speaker 3>What's always worried me and disturbed me is that what

0:10:45.370 --> 0:10:48.250
<v Speaker 3>we thought was a flaw and that people were just

0:10:48.290 --> 0:10:50.850
<v Speaker 3>holding their nose and going, oh, he's cruel and he's

0:10:51.810 --> 0:10:55.130
<v Speaker 3>you know, unkind and horrible to people, particularly women, and

0:10:55.250 --> 0:10:58.610
<v Speaker 3>is so disparaging. But people are holding their nose and

0:10:58.730 --> 0:11:02.530
<v Speaker 3>just voting for other reasons. I've now come to understand

0:11:02.650 --> 0:11:05.130
<v Speaker 3>since yesterday that it's not a flaw, it's a feature.

0:11:05.770 --> 0:11:09.570
<v Speaker 3>People are really attracted to that, And I wonder if

0:11:09.610 --> 0:11:14.250
<v Speaker 3>he's just the mouthpiece for people's anger with the world,

0:11:15.170 --> 0:11:18.810
<v Speaker 3>with the economy, with the state of their lives, with

0:11:18.930 --> 0:11:24.050
<v Speaker 3>feeling powerless, and he embodies that anger.

0:11:24.410 --> 0:11:26.410
<v Speaker 2>It's this idea of wanting to blow it all up,

0:11:27.450 --> 0:11:31.050
<v Speaker 2>and feeling a strength and a security with aligning yourself

0:11:31.050 --> 0:11:31.690
<v Speaker 2>of the bully.

0:11:31.810 --> 0:11:34.130
<v Speaker 3>We'll protect you, we'll protect women.

0:11:35.010 --> 0:11:38.210
<v Speaker 2>Is that it? That's what Megan Kelly said. That's what

0:11:38.250 --> 0:11:40.730
<v Speaker 2>she said to him at their final rally together. She

0:11:40.810 --> 0:11:42.930
<v Speaker 2>took his hands and she had tears in her eyes,

0:11:42.970 --> 0:11:45.610
<v Speaker 2>and she said, thank you for protecting us.

0:11:46.130 --> 0:11:49.650
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, the whole tradwife movement, that is this appeal of

0:11:50.490 --> 0:11:55.130
<v Speaker 3>it's hard having choices, it's hard earning money and having

0:11:55.250 --> 0:11:59.450
<v Speaker 3>jobs and having equality. Life was easier when we just

0:11:59.490 --> 0:12:02.370
<v Speaker 3>had big, strong men to protect us. Is that what

0:12:02.450 --> 0:12:02.810
<v Speaker 3>it is?

0:12:03.210 --> 0:12:06.170
<v Speaker 2>I'm actually so glad that you raised that. A friend

0:12:06.210 --> 0:12:08.410
<v Speaker 2>of mine, who was an editor at The New York Times,

0:12:08.450 --> 0:12:12.850
<v Speaker 2>leaving work yesterday after this marathon over day, said to

0:12:12.890 --> 0:12:15.890
<v Speaker 2>me the exact same thing. She said, This is why

0:12:16.090 --> 0:12:21.010
<v Speaker 2>we're seeing this fascination with tradwives, because we've decided, we

0:12:21.290 --> 0:12:25.090
<v Speaker 2>collectively women had decided it's all too much, it's too hard.

0:12:25.690 --> 0:12:29.770
<v Speaker 2>And that's why we're fascinated with the childwives, because they

0:12:29.770 --> 0:12:33.810
<v Speaker 2>seem to live an easier life than us. And that's

0:12:33.810 --> 0:12:36.850
<v Speaker 2>why we're okay with jd Vance talking about the childless

0:12:36.850 --> 0:12:37.490
<v Speaker 2>cat ladies.

0:12:38.050 --> 0:12:40.930
<v Speaker 3>I wanted to ask you about young people because they

0:12:40.930 --> 0:12:45.290
<v Speaker 3>were galvanized by Obama as a change candidate. I don't

0:12:45.290 --> 0:12:47.890
<v Speaker 3>know if they were galvanized by Joe Biden, but they

0:12:47.890 --> 0:12:52.250
<v Speaker 3>clearly weren't galvanized by Kamala Harris. Greta Tunberg, the young

0:12:52.250 --> 0:12:55.810
<v Speaker 3>climate activist who lives in Sweden, posted to Instagram the

0:12:55.890 --> 0:13:00.810
<v Speaker 3>day before the election sort of a manifesto about how

0:13:01.130 --> 0:13:04.330
<v Speaker 3>if you don't like either of the candidates because they're

0:13:04.370 --> 0:13:07.250
<v Speaker 3>not perfect, you don't have to vote at all. You

0:13:07.290 --> 0:13:10.050
<v Speaker 3>can actually just boycott the election. I know that a

0:13:10.090 --> 0:13:14.130
<v Speaker 3>lot of young people are disillusioned and upset about the

0:13:14.530 --> 0:13:17.730
<v Speaker 3>war in the Middle East and don't like that the

0:13:17.810 --> 0:13:22.490
<v Speaker 3>Biden administration has been a supporter of Israel, and there've

0:13:22.530 --> 0:13:26.730
<v Speaker 3>been a lot of student protests about Kamala Harris being

0:13:27.130 --> 0:13:31.050
<v Speaker 3>another symptom of that and another perpetrator of that support.

0:13:31.810 --> 0:13:33.330
<v Speaker 3>Do you think that had an impact?

0:13:33.650 --> 0:13:36.290
<v Speaker 2>So I have another anecdote. I'm sorry to keep bringing

0:13:36.330 --> 0:13:39.250
<v Speaker 2>the anecdotes, but you can imagine that my American text

0:13:39.250 --> 0:13:41.410
<v Speaker 2>message chains have blown up in the last twenty four

0:13:41.410 --> 0:13:45.010
<v Speaker 2>hours and I'm hearing a lot of interesting perspectives from them.

0:13:45.050 --> 0:13:47.330
<v Speaker 2>This is from a friend of mine, who is a

0:13:47.370 --> 0:13:50.730
<v Speaker 2>professor at an Ivy League university, so one of the

0:13:50.770 --> 0:13:54.570
<v Speaker 2>top universities in the US, and she teaches first year students,

0:13:55.050 --> 0:13:58.410
<v Speaker 2>and she wrote to me and said, my students are

0:13:58.450 --> 0:14:02.330
<v Speaker 2>completely unfazed. Many of them didn't vote. This is just

0:14:02.370 --> 0:14:05.410
<v Speaker 2>what they think politics is. And when politics is gross

0:14:05.530 --> 0:14:08.130
<v Speaker 2>and both sides are equally bad to them, they just

0:14:08.210 --> 0:14:10.490
<v Speaker 2>tune out. They couldn't wait for it to be over

0:14:10.610 --> 0:14:13.570
<v Speaker 2>so they wouldn't have to hear about it anymore. Oh wow,

0:14:13.810 --> 0:14:14.570
<v Speaker 2>I was shocked.

0:14:14.650 --> 0:14:18.850
<v Speaker 3>I'm shocked too, because it's not like Trump's position. You know,

0:14:18.930 --> 0:14:21.610
<v Speaker 3>he's a far more fervent supporter of your Israel than

0:14:21.650 --> 0:14:27.090
<v Speaker 3>the Democrats, and so they decided it sounds to just go, well,

0:14:27.130 --> 0:14:29.250
<v Speaker 3>I don't like anybody, so I'm not going to vote

0:14:29.250 --> 0:14:34.490
<v Speaker 3>at all. What struck me about Greta Tunberg's message was

0:14:35.010 --> 0:14:38.130
<v Speaker 3>this idea of moral purity and that being a symptom

0:14:38.130 --> 0:14:41.450
<v Speaker 3>of the left, and that if there's no perfect candidate,

0:14:41.970 --> 0:14:44.370
<v Speaker 3>we don't want to play, we will boycott, we will

0:14:44.370 --> 0:14:48.290
<v Speaker 3>sit this one out. Because now that Donald Trump's president,

0:14:48.810 --> 0:14:50.850
<v Speaker 3>what do you think he's going to do to the environment.

0:14:51.210 --> 0:14:53.690
<v Speaker 3>Not on his list of things he gives a shit

0:14:53.690 --> 0:14:55.690
<v Speaker 3>about because he can't make money out of it. What

0:14:55.770 --> 0:14:59.290
<v Speaker 3>he can make money out of is doing terrible things

0:14:59.490 --> 0:15:02.450
<v Speaker 3>to the environment and allowing other people to do terrible

0:15:02.450 --> 0:15:04.730
<v Speaker 3>things to the environment. You know, I've been reading some

0:15:04.810 --> 0:15:08.890
<v Speaker 3>commentary that says this idea of moral purity on the

0:15:08.970 --> 0:15:14.570
<v Speaker 3>left with canceling people for using the wrong pronouns or

0:15:15.010 --> 0:15:20.010
<v Speaker 3>emphasizing things around identity politics, and how these more niche

0:15:20.010 --> 0:15:23.930
<v Speaker 3>issues for them, these specific minority groups are the most

0:15:23.930 --> 0:15:27.490
<v Speaker 3>important thing, and that's driven people to the right. Do

0:15:27.490 --> 0:15:29.570
<v Speaker 3>you think there's truth in that or are we all

0:15:29.610 --> 0:15:32.250
<v Speaker 3>just like casting around for explanations.

0:15:32.650 --> 0:15:35.250
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I have two components from my answer to this,

0:15:35.330 --> 0:15:37.330
<v Speaker 2>and I want to remember to hit them both. The

0:15:37.410 --> 0:15:40.050
<v Speaker 2>first thing I'd say is, that's so fascinating the idea

0:15:40.090 --> 0:15:43.290
<v Speaker 2>of the left being caught up in these relatively niche

0:15:43.330 --> 0:15:47.290
<v Speaker 2>issues and us in the mainstream not recognizing that, because

0:15:47.650 --> 0:15:50.850
<v Speaker 2>there's an argument equally that on the right. Why a

0:15:50.850 --> 0:15:54.010
<v Speaker 2>lot of people were drawn to Trump were for cultural

0:15:54.130 --> 0:15:57.810
<v Speaker 2>reasons that the Democrats weren't even really talking about. For instance,

0:15:57.970 --> 0:16:01.050
<v Speaker 2>he ran an ad in Swing States Trump did which

0:16:01.210 --> 0:16:05.810
<v Speaker 2>was about trans athletes in schools. Now, this is not

0:16:06.010 --> 0:16:08.850
<v Speaker 2>an issue that really the Biden administration took a particularly

0:16:08.890 --> 0:16:10.010
<v Speaker 2>strong stance.

0:16:09.690 --> 0:16:12.330
<v Speaker 3>On trans athletes in schools.

0:16:12.170 --> 0:16:18.690
<v Speaker 2>Whether or not trans girls can play on girls' sports teams,

0:16:19.090 --> 0:16:21.930
<v Speaker 2>and he was saying that the Biden administration was going

0:16:21.970 --> 0:16:24.450
<v Speaker 2>to make it an uneven playing field because they were

0:16:24.450 --> 0:16:32.450
<v Speaker 2>going to let trans girl athletes compete alongside biological girls. Now,

0:16:32.490 --> 0:16:35.610
<v Speaker 2>this is not something I ever heard Kamila Harris even

0:16:35.770 --> 0:16:39.130
<v Speaker 2>talk about on the campaign trail. But I think that

0:16:39.210 --> 0:16:41.610
<v Speaker 2>you're onto something with this idea that on both the

0:16:41.690 --> 0:16:44.810
<v Speaker 2>left and the right, and we're talking here about the

0:16:44.850 --> 0:16:49.730
<v Speaker 2>more extreme factions of both sides, they're talking about issues

0:16:49.770 --> 0:16:52.970
<v Speaker 2>that we're not even awarer really on the mainstream radar,

0:16:53.490 --> 0:16:56.370
<v Speaker 2>and that those issues are serving to radicalize them. Now,

0:16:56.410 --> 0:17:01.450
<v Speaker 2>on the right, they're radicalizing them into magaworld. On the left,

0:17:01.530 --> 0:17:04.450
<v Speaker 2>they're radicalizing them into not voting. And by the way,

0:17:04.930 --> 0:17:07.970
<v Speaker 2>related to this is a really interesting idea that I

0:17:08.010 --> 0:17:12.290
<v Speaker 2>heard advanced overnight, which is that if Trump was running

0:17:12.330 --> 0:17:15.050
<v Speaker 2>for president in any other country in the world, we

0:17:15.130 --> 0:17:19.330
<v Speaker 2>would call him far right and fascistic routinely. If he

0:17:19.370 --> 0:17:21.490
<v Speaker 2>was running for president in Hungary, we would call him that.

0:17:21.890 --> 0:17:24.170
<v Speaker 2>But because he's running for president in the US, we

0:17:24.290 --> 0:17:27.970
<v Speaker 2>all can't quite believe that's what he is, so I

0:17:28.130 --> 0:17:30.250
<v Speaker 2>never hear the terms of our right applied to him.

0:17:30.290 --> 0:17:33.610
<v Speaker 2>But it's absolutely accurate anyway. That's just an aside on language.

0:17:33.610 --> 0:17:36.210
<v Speaker 2>But I think it's a really interesting point to make

0:17:36.250 --> 0:17:38.730
<v Speaker 2>that there's these kind of niche issues on both sides.

0:17:39.090 --> 0:17:42.210
<v Speaker 2>The second point that I wanted to make about young

0:17:42.290 --> 0:17:46.690
<v Speaker 2>people and the purity politics is the most convincing rebuttal

0:17:47.250 --> 0:17:51.330
<v Speaker 2>I her to that came from Alexander Orcasio Cortez, who,

0:17:51.570 --> 0:17:53.890
<v Speaker 2>as you know, I think is the most gifted communicator

0:17:53.930 --> 0:17:57.370
<v Speaker 2>in American politics, and she said in an Instagram live,

0:17:58.210 --> 0:18:01.690
<v Speaker 2>you never get anywhere by seeding your power.

0:18:01.850 --> 0:18:02.610
<v Speaker 3>What does that mean?

0:18:02.930 --> 0:18:05.370
<v Speaker 2>Meaning if you see the right to vote, you were

0:18:05.410 --> 0:18:09.450
<v Speaker 2>giving up power in the name of advancing your own aims.

0:18:09.530 --> 0:18:11.650
<v Speaker 2>You're not going to get anywhere if you give up power,

0:18:11.850 --> 0:18:14.730
<v Speaker 2>and that pragmatism seemed to be wholly missing.

0:18:14.970 --> 0:18:17.570
<v Speaker 3>You can't advance your own aims by not being on

0:18:17.610 --> 0:18:20.890
<v Speaker 3>the field, you know, by saying I'm actually sitting this

0:18:20.930 --> 0:18:24.530
<v Speaker 3>one out because neither of the teams are perfect enough.

0:18:25.010 --> 0:18:27.730
<v Speaker 2>It makes no sense. The other factor I want to

0:18:27.730 --> 0:18:30.810
<v Speaker 2>bring up with young people, which my friend's text message

0:18:30.850 --> 0:18:33.650
<v Speaker 2>to me made me think about is COVID and the

0:18:33.690 --> 0:18:37.130
<v Speaker 2>effects of COVID on this particular group of young people,

0:18:37.210 --> 0:18:39.650
<v Speaker 2>because think about it, these students that my friend is

0:18:39.690 --> 0:18:44.330
<v Speaker 2>talking about started high school at the beginning of the

0:18:44.330 --> 0:18:47.610
<v Speaker 2>pandemic or near to it, and I can't imagine how

0:18:47.650 --> 0:18:49.810
<v Speaker 2>that shaped how they think about other people in the

0:18:49.850 --> 0:18:52.610
<v Speaker 2>world to have gone through. Remember, the COVID experience in

0:18:52.650 --> 0:18:54.690
<v Speaker 2>the US was its own particular thing. It was hard

0:18:54.730 --> 0:18:58.450
<v Speaker 2>on everyone everywhere, but in the US it really radicalized

0:18:58.490 --> 0:19:00.570
<v Speaker 2>people and it dur have people mad a lot of

0:19:00.570 --> 0:19:04.930
<v Speaker 2>the time. So I'm wondering whether the pandemic's long shadow

0:19:05.210 --> 0:19:07.890
<v Speaker 2>has shaped their worldview in a way that we can't

0:19:07.890 --> 0:19:09.650
<v Speaker 2>even fully assess. What do you think of that?

0:19:09.930 --> 0:19:13.250
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think that the days of multiple terms for

0:19:13.290 --> 0:19:17.250
<v Speaker 3>any government are probably gone. Also, just because a four

0:19:17.330 --> 0:19:20.050
<v Speaker 3>year term or even a three year term feels like

0:19:20.090 --> 0:19:22.970
<v Speaker 3>a really long time when we're living our lives in

0:19:22.970 --> 0:19:27.130
<v Speaker 3>increments of text messages and you know, flicking through reels

0:19:27.130 --> 0:19:30.570
<v Speaker 3>and tiktoks. So I think that this idea of we're

0:19:30.570 --> 0:19:32.690
<v Speaker 3>going to be in it for the long haul just

0:19:32.730 --> 0:19:36.850
<v Speaker 3>doesn't apply in politics. And I think this idea of change, change, change,

0:19:37.650 --> 0:19:40.370
<v Speaker 3>the idea that a changing It's going to be different,

0:19:40.410 --> 0:19:42.050
<v Speaker 3>It's going to be different, It's going to be different.

0:19:42.490 --> 0:19:45.290
<v Speaker 3>What's interesting about this is that it was so upside

0:19:45.290 --> 0:19:49.130
<v Speaker 3>down because in some ways the change is going backwards

0:19:49.130 --> 0:19:53.170
<v Speaker 3>because it's going back to Trump, and Carmela was an

0:19:53.250 --> 0:19:56.930
<v Speaker 3>incumbent but was also a change because it was moving

0:19:56.970 --> 0:20:01.370
<v Speaker 3>away from Joe Biden. So it was a very confusing feeling.

0:20:01.370 --> 0:20:03.850
<v Speaker 3>And I think whoever was going to come across as

0:20:03.850 --> 0:20:07.250
<v Speaker 3>the biggest change candidate was probably going to win. And

0:20:07.290 --> 0:20:09.290
<v Speaker 3>I think that's true in any election, which is why

0:20:09.290 --> 0:20:12.650
<v Speaker 3>I think an incumbent can't campaign as a change candidate.

0:20:12.690 --> 0:20:16.250
<v Speaker 3>She tried, and she felt like, one, do you think

0:20:16.330 --> 0:20:19.130
<v Speaker 3>that it would have been different if Biden had stayed.

0:20:19.130 --> 0:20:21.010
<v Speaker 2>Yes, because then I think it would have been two

0:20:21.090 --> 0:20:23.970
<v Speaker 2>old white men competing, So you would have taken the

0:20:24.010 --> 0:20:29.730
<v Speaker 2>whole racism, sexism, misogyny dynamic out of the race. Which

0:20:29.770 --> 0:20:31.170
<v Speaker 2>is not to say that by one of one, but

0:20:31.210 --> 0:20:33.970
<v Speaker 2>that's where my head's out on that question. The change

0:20:33.970 --> 0:20:38.010
<v Speaker 2>candidate thing. One decision the campaign made is haunting me,

0:20:38.530 --> 0:20:41.250
<v Speaker 2>and that was the decision to bring in the Cheneese,

0:20:41.330 --> 0:20:43.730
<v Speaker 2>to bring in Lynn Cheney, the daughter of Dick Cheney,

0:20:44.170 --> 0:20:47.850
<v Speaker 2>who was very prominent in the George W. Bush years.

0:20:47.970 --> 0:20:50.090
<v Speaker 2>He worked for George W. Bush and was sort of

0:20:50.090 --> 0:20:53.170
<v Speaker 2>the architect of the Iraq War. You're just making me

0:20:53.290 --> 0:20:58.010
<v Speaker 2>realize now that bringing up on stage people who remind

0:20:58.050 --> 0:21:02.050
<v Speaker 2>Americans of this real low point, like an objectively low

0:21:02.130 --> 0:21:04.890
<v Speaker 2>point for the country, which was when it was mired

0:21:05.010 --> 0:21:06.890
<v Speaker 2>in war in Iraq and it was post nine to

0:21:06.890 --> 0:21:11.530
<v Speaker 2>eleven and the economy was stumbling. That just seems in

0:21:11.610 --> 0:21:13.850
<v Speaker 2>retrospect like a really crazy idea.

0:21:14.490 --> 0:21:17.530
<v Speaker 3>Well, they half understood because they Hillary was nowhere to

0:21:17.530 --> 0:21:17.930
<v Speaker 3>be seen.

0:21:18.210 --> 0:21:19.090
<v Speaker 2>That's true.

0:21:19.130 --> 0:21:22.650
<v Speaker 3>She was, you know, ive act and kept way out

0:21:22.730 --> 0:21:25.850
<v Speaker 3>of sight. The celebrities weren't. I know a lot of

0:21:25.890 --> 0:21:29.290
<v Speaker 3>people who were really fearful every time Kamala got a

0:21:29.330 --> 0:21:32.770
<v Speaker 3>new celebrity endorsement or wheeled out Oprah or you know,

0:21:33.090 --> 0:21:36.290
<v Speaker 3>had Beyonce at a rally, or I think even Katy

0:21:36.370 --> 0:21:38.770
<v Speaker 3>Perry at the end, because that didn't work for Hillary.

0:21:38.970 --> 0:21:43.130
<v Speaker 3>That sense of the elites celebrities, it just doesn't work

0:21:43.170 --> 0:21:46.050
<v Speaker 3>when you've got Donald Trump driving a garbage truck and

0:21:46.890 --> 0:21:52.810
<v Speaker 3>pretending to work in McDonald's and cosplaying being working class again,

0:21:52.850 --> 0:21:55.730
<v Speaker 3>it just felt like upside down world. Where he's got

0:21:55.730 --> 0:21:58.330
<v Speaker 3>a gold toilet and his actual friends are billionaires who

0:21:58.410 --> 0:21:59.570
<v Speaker 3>he does favors for.

0:21:59.890 --> 0:22:03.970
<v Speaker 2>Katy Perry really gave me twenty sixteen. He Begb's when

0:22:04.010 --> 0:22:08.010
<v Speaker 2>she appeared on stage that last night in Philadelphia, the

0:22:08.050 --> 0:22:10.810
<v Speaker 2>same place where Hillary had her rally the last night

0:22:10.850 --> 0:22:14.010
<v Speaker 2>before the election. With Katy Perry, it's like Katy Perry

0:22:14.010 --> 0:22:17.330
<v Speaker 2>herself feels like a portal to twenty thirteen.

0:22:17.930 --> 0:22:20.410
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I was listening the other day that Katy Perry

0:22:20.490 --> 0:22:23.530
<v Speaker 3>is like. It was her fortieth birthday a couple of

0:22:23.530 --> 0:22:26.930
<v Speaker 3>weeks ago when the Washington Post declared that it wouldn't

0:22:26.970 --> 0:22:30.090
<v Speaker 3>be endorsing a candidate, and everybody came for Jeff Bezos,

0:22:30.130 --> 0:22:32.850
<v Speaker 3>and she was with Jeff Bezos at her fortieth birthday

0:22:33.570 --> 0:22:36.410
<v Speaker 3>on a train on the Rony Express with a whole

0:22:36.410 --> 0:22:40.050
<v Speaker 3>lot of celebrities. So yeah, I know that she offered

0:22:40.130 --> 0:22:43.850
<v Speaker 3>early in the campaign her song, her terrible song, Woman's World,

0:22:44.090 --> 0:22:49.650
<v Speaker 3>which felt so retrograde like fight Song back in twenty sixteen,

0:22:50.410 --> 0:22:53.650
<v Speaker 3>and the Harris campaign said no and instead went with

0:22:54.050 --> 0:22:57.810
<v Speaker 3>Freedom by Beyonce. But at the end of the day,

0:22:58.010 --> 0:23:01.890
<v Speaker 3>all of those rules about what works, what is an

0:23:01.930 --> 0:23:05.490
<v Speaker 3>acceptable way for a presidential campaign and candidate to behave,

0:23:06.730 --> 0:23:08.850
<v Speaker 3>They're all thrown out the window, right, He's just burnt

0:23:08.890 --> 0:23:09.930
<v Speaker 3>down all of.

0:23:09.850 --> 0:23:12.610
<v Speaker 2>It he has and can I I'm not quite ready

0:23:12.650 --> 0:23:15.970
<v Speaker 2>to talk about like what Trump will do. I want

0:23:16.010 --> 0:23:19.970
<v Speaker 2>to say one thing about feelings. I've got this gut

0:23:20.010 --> 0:23:22.570
<v Speaker 2>why it didn't work for Harris. I dug around her

0:23:22.610 --> 0:23:25.570
<v Speaker 2>YouTube channel the other day. It was a couple of

0:23:25.610 --> 0:23:28.610
<v Speaker 2>days before the election, and I wanted to feel something.

0:23:29.010 --> 0:23:31.250
<v Speaker 2>So I went to her YouTube channel and I was

0:23:31.290 --> 0:23:33.970
<v Speaker 2>clicking on some of the videos. I wanted to feel inspired,

0:23:34.610 --> 0:23:37.290
<v Speaker 2>part of something that was bigger than myself in the

0:23:37.290 --> 0:23:40.090
<v Speaker 2>way that all great political movements need to make people feel.

0:23:40.690 --> 0:23:43.490
<v Speaker 2>And there was nothing on there. Now. They had ninety days,

0:23:43.530 --> 0:23:45.730
<v Speaker 2>they did not have a lot of time. But why

0:23:45.770 --> 0:23:49.090
<v Speaker 2>didn't I ever feel anything when I heard her speak

0:23:49.210 --> 0:23:52.170
<v Speaker 2>or when I watched her campaign videos. I'm a sucker

0:23:52.170 --> 0:23:54.770
<v Speaker 2>for those. I love a good political ad with people

0:23:54.890 --> 0:23:58.090
<v Speaker 2>drinking coffee and going to work and then soaring music

0:23:58.170 --> 0:24:00.610
<v Speaker 2>and then we are bigger than any one of us.

0:24:00.690 --> 0:24:04.330
<v Speaker 2>I love those moments. I didn't get any of those moments. Instead,

0:24:04.370 --> 0:24:07.530
<v Speaker 2>I got Katie Perry, fresh off the train with Jeff

0:24:07.570 --> 0:24:13.130
<v Speaker 2>Bezos regaling us with an not particularly in tune woman's world.

0:24:13.530 --> 0:24:15.730
<v Speaker 3>Do you know when I did feel something, and when

0:24:15.770 --> 0:24:19.290
<v Speaker 3>I think it was the height of it is when

0:24:19.970 --> 0:24:24.330
<v Speaker 3>she was declared the nominee, and around the time of

0:24:24.330 --> 0:24:28.730
<v Speaker 3>the DNC, when it was Tim Walls who was the

0:24:28.770 --> 0:24:33.650
<v Speaker 3>coach of America, when it was Karmala is Brat, when

0:24:33.930 --> 0:24:36.290
<v Speaker 3>it really did feel like that, it felt like a

0:24:36.330 --> 0:24:39.450
<v Speaker 3>step change. It was, here's this new vision of the

0:24:39.490 --> 0:24:44.490
<v Speaker 3>future versus this old cranky uncle who's ranting on Facebook.

0:24:45.410 --> 0:24:48.930
<v Speaker 3>But it didn't last. It didn't last after the convention

0:24:49.290 --> 0:24:51.930
<v Speaker 3>and Trump got that after his assassination attempt. I felt

0:24:51.930 --> 0:24:54.650
<v Speaker 3>that for Trump, not personally, but I felt the culture

0:24:55.490 --> 0:24:58.410
<v Speaker 3>go that way. And then I felt the culture go

0:24:58.530 --> 0:25:02.570
<v Speaker 3>that way for Karmala. But then I agree with you completely.

0:25:02.650 --> 0:25:05.530
<v Speaker 3>The last few weeks, I just I never felt it again.

0:25:05.930 --> 0:25:08.850
<v Speaker 3>It dissipated, and then maybe a little bit around the

0:25:08.890 --> 0:25:12.010
<v Speaker 3>time of the debate, but then nothing. I just I

0:25:12.010 --> 0:25:15.010
<v Speaker 3>felt like there was no cut through, there was no there.

0:25:14.930 --> 0:25:18.610
<v Speaker 5>Was no vibes, no And something you said there about

0:25:18.650 --> 0:25:21.730
<v Speaker 5>how you felt something around Brat me, remember that I

0:25:21.850 --> 0:25:25.250
<v Speaker 5>felt something, you know, when I felt a little teary.

0:25:25.490 --> 0:25:28.250
<v Speaker 3>It was fun, it felt joyful for the first time

0:25:28.450 --> 0:25:31.570
<v Speaker 3>US politics was like, oh my god, instead of these

0:25:31.890 --> 0:25:37.090
<v Speaker 3>embarrassing old men fighting and Biden and Shuffler, I mean it,

0:25:37.170 --> 0:25:38.930
<v Speaker 3>suddenly it was like, oh my gosh, it could be

0:25:38.930 --> 0:25:40.090
<v Speaker 3>actually cool and fun.

0:25:40.250 --> 0:25:43.610
<v Speaker 2>Here's when I felt something. It was actually a few

0:25:43.690 --> 0:25:47.970
<v Speaker 2>days before the end of the campaign, the SNL skit take.

0:25:47.810 --> 0:25:54.570
<v Speaker 6>My Pamela, the American people want to start the chaos

0:25:54.770 --> 0:26:00.450
<v Speaker 6>and and the dramaa with a cool new step Mamala

0:26:00.650 --> 0:26:04.050
<v Speaker 6>pick backing our pajamaa's and watch a rum Pamela.

0:26:04.170 --> 0:26:07.170
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, keep calm and carry on. Ala. I felt something

0:26:07.330 --> 0:26:09.970
<v Speaker 2>very different to what I think you need to feel

0:26:10.330 --> 0:26:13.410
<v Speaker 2>on the verge of winning a presidential election, which is

0:26:13.530 --> 0:26:20.330
<v Speaker 2>it was a small, intimate, beautiful moment between two black

0:26:21.490 --> 0:26:24.770
<v Speaker 2>literally sitting at a vanity like it's the smallest moment.

0:26:25.130 --> 0:26:28.930
<v Speaker 2>It's a private moment actually, and the skip was Camel

0:26:29.410 --> 0:26:32.890
<v Speaker 2>talking to herself. And I'm actually getting chills thinking about it,

0:26:32.930 --> 0:26:35.690
<v Speaker 2>because I feel like that's not what you want a

0:26:35.770 --> 0:26:38.570
<v Speaker 2>giant political campaign to climax with. I thought it was

0:26:38.610 --> 0:26:41.690
<v Speaker 2>a beautiful moment. It made me tear up. The respect

0:26:41.730 --> 0:26:44.570
<v Speaker 2>and admiration that you could feel between these two women,

0:26:44.650 --> 0:26:48.930
<v Speaker 2>the genuine feeling and emotion between two women who are

0:26:48.930 --> 0:26:51.970
<v Speaker 2>at the top of their game, really respecting each other

0:26:52.210 --> 0:26:54.650
<v Speaker 2>and having this moment. But that's not enough to win

0:26:54.690 --> 0:26:57.490
<v Speaker 2>an election. That's not going to win it.

0:26:57.610 --> 0:27:00.290
<v Speaker 3>Just to wrap up, can we think of anything positive

0:27:00.290 --> 0:27:00.570
<v Speaker 3>to say?

0:27:00.570 --> 0:27:02.490
<v Speaker 2>I know that's what we said yesterday.

0:27:02.290 --> 0:27:04.530
<v Speaker 3>But you know, in the cold light of day, the

0:27:04.650 --> 0:27:09.970
<v Speaker 3>day after the markets are up cryptosauring there are a

0:27:10.010 --> 0:27:12.490
<v Speaker 3>lot of signs that the business world is very, very

0:27:12.530 --> 0:27:15.930
<v Speaker 3>happy with the result. Are there any bright spots?

0:27:16.170 --> 0:27:18.010
<v Speaker 2>It's not a bright spot, But I'm going to tell

0:27:18.010 --> 0:27:22.050
<v Speaker 2>you what another friend texted me because I found it

0:27:22.170 --> 0:27:25.450
<v Speaker 2>not a bright spot but comforting. And she wrote to

0:27:25.490 --> 0:27:28.930
<v Speaker 2>me that she'd been talking to her therapist about what

0:27:29.050 --> 0:27:31.370
<v Speaker 2>to do and how to think about this, and her

0:27:31.410 --> 0:27:35.450
<v Speaker 2>therapist said that you need to accept what is happening.

0:27:35.730 --> 0:27:38.930
<v Speaker 2>That's not enough. And so the thought that her therapist

0:27:39.010 --> 0:27:42.490
<v Speaker 2>came up with is this is happening, and I still

0:27:42.530 --> 0:27:45.410
<v Speaker 2>need to keep doing the right thing. I appreciated the

0:27:45.450 --> 0:27:48.850
<v Speaker 2>acceptance of reality. I'm not into unlike in twenty sixteen,

0:27:48.890 --> 0:27:52.250
<v Speaker 2>where I was seeking out opium, like this idea of

0:27:52.330 --> 0:27:55.370
<v Speaker 2>like we can still fight, we can win, We've got

0:27:55.410 --> 0:27:59.170
<v Speaker 2>to resist pussy hats No, none of that. It is

0:27:59.210 --> 0:27:59.690
<v Speaker 2>what it is.

0:27:59.810 --> 0:28:01.570
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it doesn't feel like that, does it.

0:28:01.690 --> 0:28:05.810
<v Speaker 2>No, he controls it all. There's no silver lining. But

0:28:06.130 --> 0:28:07.890
<v Speaker 2>what are we going to do. We can't just roll

0:28:07.930 --> 0:28:10.570
<v Speaker 2>over like We've got to keep doing what we think

0:28:10.650 --> 0:28:14.490
<v Speaker 2>is right and in our small ways and in ways

0:28:14.530 --> 0:28:17.330
<v Speaker 2>that we can. And I found that kind of soothing.

0:28:17.650 --> 0:28:20.290
<v Speaker 3>Thank you, I love you. If we can't have optimism,

0:28:20.450 --> 0:28:22.330
<v Speaker 3>can at least be a little bit soothed.

0:28:22.650 --> 0:28:24.810
<v Speaker 2>Lots of love Now before I go.

0:28:25.210 --> 0:28:28.170
<v Speaker 3>Yesterday, we watch the world change in a way that

0:28:28.250 --> 0:28:31.730
<v Speaker 3>has left many women feeling shocked and confused. Many of

0:28:31.810 --> 0:28:35.650
<v Speaker 3>us are fearful of what's to come because across the ocean,

0:28:35.770 --> 0:28:38.250
<v Speaker 3>a new president was elected, but the waves of this

0:28:38.330 --> 0:28:41.570
<v Speaker 3>decision have reached us right here in Australia. As you

0:28:41.690 --> 0:28:45.050
<v Speaker 3>just heard. When America takes a step, the world feels

0:28:45.050 --> 0:28:47.890
<v Speaker 3>its impact, and for many of us, especially women, it

0:28:48.010 --> 0:28:52.530
<v Speaker 3>feels like an unsettling backwards step, and at an uncertain time.

0:28:52.890 --> 0:28:55.810
<v Speaker 3>More than ever, we need to ensure that women's experiences

0:28:55.850 --> 0:29:00.130
<v Speaker 3>and perspectives don't just fade into the background. And today

0:29:00.250 --> 0:29:02.890
<v Speaker 3>the role of independent media has never been more vital.

0:29:03.530 --> 0:29:05.850
<v Speaker 3>Now's the time to ensure that our stories are told,

0:29:06.250 --> 0:29:09.930
<v Speaker 3>our voices are not just heard, but amplified, and we

0:29:09.970 --> 0:29:12.850
<v Speaker 3>need to make sure our issues don't disappear from the conversation.

0:29:13.770 --> 0:29:16.210
<v Speaker 3>Muma Mia. This is our core purpose, it's actually our

0:29:16.210 --> 0:29:18.730
<v Speaker 3>only purpose, to make the world a better place for

0:29:18.810 --> 0:29:23.730
<v Speaker 3>women and girls of female writers, podcasters, and content creators

0:29:24.090 --> 0:29:26.610
<v Speaker 3>are committed to covering the stories that matter to women,

0:29:26.930 --> 0:29:29.810
<v Speaker 3>to standing with you, and to helping you make sense

0:29:29.970 --> 0:29:33.650
<v Speaker 3>of this world that we're navigating together. We're rolling up

0:29:33.650 --> 0:29:37.090
<v Speaker 3>our sleeves today and every day to ensure that our

0:29:37.130 --> 0:29:40.290
<v Speaker 3>coverage is sharper, Our support for women's voices is stronger,

0:29:40.850 --> 0:29:44.370
<v Speaker 3>and our pledge to you is unwavering. So a few

0:29:44.370 --> 0:29:47.810
<v Speaker 3>believers we do in the power of independent women's media.

0:29:47.930 --> 0:29:50.450
<v Speaker 3>There is something that you can do to help. For

0:29:50.530 --> 0:29:52.610
<v Speaker 3>less than two dollars a week, you can support our

0:29:52.650 --> 0:29:55.290
<v Speaker 3>mission to keep women's voices at the heart of the

0:29:55.330 --> 0:29:59.970
<v Speaker 3>conversation by subscribing to Mum and Meya. Every subscription strengthens

0:29:59.970 --> 0:30:02.810
<v Speaker 3>our ability to deliver the content you rely on, like

0:30:02.890 --> 0:30:06.170
<v Speaker 3>what you've just heard, and helps to raise women's voices.

0:30:06.730 --> 0:30:10.490
<v Speaker 3>Let's stand together, Let's keep going, because now more than ever,

0:30:11.090 --> 0:30:13.890
<v Speaker 3>our voices matter. There's a link in the show notes

0:30:14.170 --> 0:30:17.090
<v Speaker 3>where you can subscribe to Muma Maya for less than.

0:30:16.930 --> 0:30:18.250
<v Speaker 2>Two dollars a week.

0:30:18.530 --> 0:30:21.930
<v Speaker 3>That's less than a coffee. We think women's voices are

0:30:21.970 --> 0:30:25.490
<v Speaker 3>worth at least that much. Lots of love, and we'll

0:30:25.530 --> 0:30:27.090
<v Speaker 3>be back in your ears tomorrow