WEBVTT - Wuthering Heights & the ‘Bad Man’ Controversy

0:00:08.234 --> 0:00:10.914
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to Amma Mia podcast.

0:00:16.074 --> 0:00:18.753
<v Speaker 2>Hello and welcome to Mamma Mia out Loud. It's what

0:00:18.794 --> 0:00:22.273
<v Speaker 2>women are actually talking about on Monday, the sixteenth of February.

0:00:22.393 --> 0:00:25.234
<v Speaker 3>I'm Olly Wayne, right, I'm Jesse Stevens.

0:00:24.714 --> 0:00:25.954
<v Speaker 1>And I'm Amelia Lester.

0:00:26.314 --> 0:00:29.874
<v Speaker 2>And here's what's on our agenda for today. Wuthering Heights

0:00:29.994 --> 0:00:31.674
<v Speaker 2>and the return of the Bad.

0:00:31.594 --> 0:00:35.154
<v Speaker 1>Man looks Maxing Are we really doing this now?

0:00:35.473 --> 0:00:39.313
<v Speaker 4>And Harper Beckham, Celeste Barber and the question of how

0:00:39.314 --> 0:00:43.833
<v Speaker 4>to handle very tricky relationship moments on social media.

0:00:43.913 --> 0:00:47.153
<v Speaker 2>But first, in case you missed it, did we just

0:00:47.273 --> 0:00:50.674
<v Speaker 2>see another shit skirt flying off a glass.

0:00:50.354 --> 0:00:52.434
<v Speaker 5>Cliff in Australian politics?

0:00:53.074 --> 0:00:55.234
<v Speaker 2>Or is what just happened in the Liberal Party a

0:00:55.273 --> 0:00:56.834
<v Speaker 2>little more complicated than that?

0:00:57.674 --> 0:00:58.353
<v Speaker 5>Quick catch up?

0:00:58.354 --> 0:01:00.114
<v Speaker 2>And don't worry, we are going to keep it brief.

0:01:00.194 --> 0:01:04.074
<v Speaker 2>I know that everybody's tolerance of a discussion about politics like,

0:01:04.434 --> 0:01:06.994
<v Speaker 2>oh god, we are going to keep it brief. But

0:01:07.314 --> 0:01:10.953
<v Speaker 2>last Friday, the worst kept secret and Australian politics played

0:01:10.954 --> 0:01:14.874
<v Speaker 2>out exactly as predicted. The first female leader of the

0:01:14.874 --> 0:01:17.074
<v Speaker 2>Liberal Party, Susan Lee, lost her job.

0:01:17.234 --> 0:01:18.393
<v Speaker 5>She was rolled, as.

0:01:18.234 --> 0:01:22.074
<v Speaker 2>We so charmingly put it in Australia by Angus Taylor,

0:01:22.354 --> 0:01:25.314
<v Speaker 2>a man who's been stalking that job for about a decade.

0:01:25.634 --> 0:01:28.314
<v Speaker 2>She served nine months in the role, and no one

0:01:28.354 --> 0:01:31.394
<v Speaker 2>who's been watching political headlines lately could really argue that

0:01:31.474 --> 0:01:34.834
<v Speaker 2>she did a very good job. Although my shit skirt

0:01:34.874 --> 0:01:38.354
<v Speaker 2>analogy is just a refresher for anyone who doesn't remember.

0:01:38.394 --> 0:01:42.114
<v Speaker 2>This is that when something political is in a terrible mess.

0:01:42.194 --> 0:01:44.953
<v Speaker 2>So let's imagine, for example, that your party just lost

0:01:44.954 --> 0:01:47.994
<v Speaker 2>the election in a landslide and your primary vote is

0:01:48.034 --> 0:01:50.434
<v Speaker 2>in collapse and you've been chased out of every city

0:01:50.474 --> 0:01:54.794
<v Speaker 2>in the country, as the Liberal Party has. Sometimes people go, oh,

0:01:54.874 --> 0:01:56.634
<v Speaker 2>this is a good idea, a good time to put

0:01:56.634 --> 0:01:57.514
<v Speaker 2>a woman in charge.

0:01:57.674 --> 0:01:57.914
<v Speaker 3>Yes.

0:01:57.994 --> 0:02:00.794
<v Speaker 4>So the president for that, of course is Theresa May

0:02:00.794 --> 0:02:04.074
<v Speaker 4>inheriting Brexit right, and so you were just like she

0:02:04.194 --> 0:02:09.514
<v Speaker 4>was given this pile of little all shit and told

0:02:09.594 --> 0:02:11.994
<v Speaker 4>to deal with it, and there was no solution.

0:02:12.394 --> 0:02:14.394
<v Speaker 2>The idea is that you're dealing with You're trying to

0:02:14.394 --> 0:02:16.954
<v Speaker 2>clean up this mess, and whichever way you do it,

0:02:17.074 --> 0:02:19.434
<v Speaker 2>everyone in the gallery is just going, no, you need

0:02:19.474 --> 0:02:20.514
<v Speaker 2>a stay and remover on that.

0:02:20.874 --> 0:02:23.074
<v Speaker 5>No, a bit assault model, get it out, vinegars. What

0:02:23.114 --> 0:02:24.354
<v Speaker 5>you need you're doing it wrong.

0:02:24.194 --> 0:02:27.034
<v Speaker 4>And you're just rubbing it in and needs to be

0:02:27.354 --> 0:02:27.954
<v Speaker 4>set on fire.

0:02:27.954 --> 0:02:29.634
<v Speaker 1>Are you going to explain why it was not in

0:02:29.674 --> 0:02:31.754
<v Speaker 1>fact a shitskirt? She didn't do a good child.

0:02:31.794 --> 0:02:33.674
<v Speaker 5>So she didn't do a good job. Poles are in

0:02:33.714 --> 0:02:37.274
<v Speaker 5>the toilet. Toilet not another analogy, poles are and toy.

0:02:37.394 --> 0:02:39.474
<v Speaker 2>But the argument about the shitskirt and the glass cliff

0:02:39.514 --> 0:02:41.394
<v Speaker 2>is whether or not anybody could have really done a

0:02:41.394 --> 0:02:43.234
<v Speaker 2>good job in this particular position.

0:02:43.314 --> 0:02:44.434
<v Speaker 3>She didn't get out the sad.

0:02:44.794 --> 0:02:47.114
<v Speaker 2>She really didn't get out the sad, and everyone else

0:02:47.194 --> 0:02:50.634
<v Speaker 2>is like, I've got the side anyway. So after that

0:02:50.754 --> 0:02:54.514
<v Speaker 2>landslide election loss, the Libs had a big argument about

0:02:54.514 --> 0:02:57.154
<v Speaker 2>what they had to do. Either try and win back

0:02:57.194 --> 0:02:59.634
<v Speaker 2>the cities that they lost to the Teals or go

0:02:59.714 --> 0:03:01.794
<v Speaker 2>after the votes that they're losing to one nation in

0:03:01.834 --> 0:03:04.674
<v Speaker 2>the regions. And Lee managed to do neither of those things.

0:03:05.314 --> 0:03:08.633
<v Speaker 2>And the polling on the Liberal Party and now in

0:03:08.674 --> 0:03:12.194
<v Speaker 2>the toilet, as I discussed there sometimes party the Nationals

0:03:12.194 --> 0:03:15.234
<v Speaker 2>are on this on off love affair and they are

0:03:15.354 --> 0:03:18.194
<v Speaker 2>now behind one nation in the polls. And this is

0:03:18.274 --> 0:03:21.634
<v Speaker 2>quite the feat because the Liberals historically in Australia have

0:03:21.634 --> 0:03:23.314
<v Speaker 2>been in power more than any other party. There used

0:03:23.314 --> 0:03:25.994
<v Speaker 2>to be the default government pretty much and now they

0:03:25.994 --> 0:03:27.474
<v Speaker 2>are third in the polls.

0:03:27.514 --> 0:03:31.353
<v Speaker 4>In the last election, the Liberal Party which lost abysmally,

0:03:31.834 --> 0:03:36.034
<v Speaker 4>they had thirty two percent of preference votes and then

0:03:36.074 --> 0:03:38.674
<v Speaker 4>a recent poll this was cited in Jaquelin Malee's column

0:03:38.714 --> 0:03:42.114
<v Speaker 4>over the weekend, said that they're down to about eighteen

0:03:42.234 --> 0:03:44.554
<v Speaker 4>percent of the primary vote. So whether it was a

0:03:44.634 --> 0:03:48.634
<v Speaker 4>man or a woman, with those polling numbers, the party

0:03:48.674 --> 0:03:50.474
<v Speaker 4>had no choice but to replace that leader.

0:03:50.794 --> 0:03:53.474
<v Speaker 1>Has that ever happened before that one nation has overtaken

0:03:53.634 --> 0:03:54.154
<v Speaker 1>the Libs?

0:03:54.314 --> 0:03:54.554
<v Speaker 5>No?

0:03:54.554 --> 0:03:57.274
<v Speaker 2>No, no, they are on the ascent at the moment.

0:03:58.314 --> 0:04:01.634
<v Speaker 2>Step in Angus Taylor, who is a Liberal leader from

0:04:01.714 --> 0:04:02.474
<v Speaker 2>Central Casting.

0:04:02.554 --> 0:04:05.154
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. First, starting with his name, Angus Taylor.

0:04:05.514 --> 0:04:09.274
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, he could not be more of an Anglo liberal

0:04:09.394 --> 0:04:12.674
<v Speaker 2>white guy if he tried. I did hear some people

0:04:12.914 --> 0:04:15.074
<v Speaker 2>talking on Friday about like he looks like a leader,

0:04:15.714 --> 0:04:16.674
<v Speaker 2>which is code for.

0:04:16.674 --> 0:04:17.553
<v Speaker 5>Would be the penis.

0:04:17.873 --> 0:04:20.753
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the penis and the fact like he's from a

0:04:20.794 --> 0:04:23.073
<v Speaker 2>farming family, but he went to a very posh private

0:04:23.113 --> 0:04:23.713
<v Speaker 2>boys school.

0:04:23.753 --> 0:04:24.873
<v Speaker 5>He was a Rhodes scholar.

0:04:24.953 --> 0:04:27.633
<v Speaker 2>He's that guy business da da da, He's the liberal

0:04:27.674 --> 0:04:30.553
<v Speaker 2>guy and he has stepped in, and of course he

0:04:30.633 --> 0:04:32.914
<v Speaker 2>knows how to get the shit out of the skirt.

0:04:33.834 --> 0:04:35.713
<v Speaker 1>What do we think, friends, So is he going to

0:04:35.794 --> 0:04:38.713
<v Speaker 1>take it further to the right and try and get

0:04:38.714 --> 0:04:40.834
<v Speaker 1>the one nation vote or do you think he's going

0:04:40.873 --> 0:04:44.674
<v Speaker 1>to like double down on sort of more old school. Ye.

0:04:45.834 --> 0:04:48.354
<v Speaker 4>I think he's going to go a little bit more right,

0:04:48.393 --> 0:04:50.753
<v Speaker 4>and he's definitely from the conservative faction of the party.

0:04:51.393 --> 0:04:54.073
<v Speaker 4>But in saying that, he's also like, I want to

0:04:54.073 --> 0:04:58.993
<v Speaker 4>bring us back to John Howard era politics. And it's

0:04:59.073 --> 0:05:01.953
<v Speaker 4>an interesting strategy given that the Liberal Party have lost

0:05:01.993 --> 0:05:04.394
<v Speaker 4>women and they've lost young people. So to put in

0:05:04.433 --> 0:05:08.433
<v Speaker 4>a conservative guy who doesn't particularly appeal to either of

0:05:08.474 --> 0:05:11.634
<v Speaker 4>those demographics, as far as I can tell, is an

0:05:11.633 --> 0:05:15.313
<v Speaker 4>interesting play. He's the guy, and I felt like this

0:05:15.433 --> 0:05:16.514
<v Speaker 4>was important context.

0:05:16.594 --> 0:05:18.033
<v Speaker 2>I know what you're gonna tell us, and this is

0:05:18.154 --> 0:05:22.433
<v Speaker 2>maybe the best political story everybody pay attention again.

0:05:22.594 --> 0:05:26.873
<v Speaker 4>Twenty nineteen Facebook status by Angus Taylor about something great

0:05:26.914 --> 0:05:29.553
<v Speaker 4>that he was doing in politics, and then there was

0:05:29.594 --> 0:05:32.674
<v Speaker 4>a comment. It was his official Liberal Party account, and

0:05:32.674 --> 0:05:35.993
<v Speaker 4>then there was a comment underneath that said fantastic, great move,

0:05:36.073 --> 0:05:39.313
<v Speaker 4>well done, Angus, And that was from Angus Taylor MP,

0:05:39.714 --> 0:05:42.153
<v Speaker 4>and he had commented on his own Facebook page but

0:05:42.234 --> 0:05:45.234
<v Speaker 4>like forgotten to change the name. So he's all of

0:05:45.313 --> 0:05:46.274
<v Speaker 4>us trying to.

0:05:46.393 --> 0:05:50.513
<v Speaker 1>Like drum up a bit of hype latest program exactly.

0:05:50.753 --> 0:05:53.833
<v Speaker 4>It's incredibly relatable. But he's that guy, and he has

0:05:53.914 --> 0:05:56.954
<v Speaker 4>had like a very long list of faux pas. I

0:05:57.034 --> 0:06:01.113
<v Speaker 4>suppose he was behind a lot of the very unpopular

0:06:01.193 --> 0:06:04.593
<v Speaker 4>policies that came forward in the last election, Like he

0:06:04.834 --> 0:06:09.794
<v Speaker 4>was the guy behind the stopping work from home policy, right, But.

0:06:09.794 --> 0:06:10.794
<v Speaker 5>That's not a faux part.

0:06:10.873 --> 0:06:12.833
<v Speaker 1>Faux part makes it sound like he used the wrong fork.

0:06:13.193 --> 0:06:14.514
<v Speaker 1>This is like what he did that.

0:06:14.633 --> 0:06:18.593
<v Speaker 4>With policy, just unpopular policies. He was very against the

0:06:18.633 --> 0:06:22.753
<v Speaker 4>Stage three tax cards. He's very much like when you

0:06:22.834 --> 0:06:25.314
<v Speaker 4>look back, it's not like he's been a particularly popular

0:06:25.354 --> 0:06:26.593
<v Speaker 4>politician by any means.

0:06:26.633 --> 0:06:28.633
<v Speaker 1>But his name is Angus Taylor, and he's a man,

0:06:28.714 --> 0:06:32.953
<v Speaker 1>and he comes from a farm. Yes, stop asking questions.

0:06:33.073 --> 0:06:34.113
<v Speaker 5>He's very ambitious.

0:06:34.393 --> 0:06:36.633
<v Speaker 2>The thing is is that Susan Lee, who has been

0:06:36.674 --> 0:06:40.593
<v Speaker 2>gracious in stepping away, has left them with the shit skirt,

0:06:40.633 --> 0:06:42.753
<v Speaker 2>which I respect because she's going to quit. She's not

0:06:42.794 --> 0:06:44.833
<v Speaker 2>just stepping away from being the leader. She's actually quitting

0:06:45.354 --> 0:06:47.593
<v Speaker 2>and what that means is they have to have a

0:06:47.594 --> 0:06:50.674
<v Speaker 2>by election in her seat, and what that means is

0:06:50.714 --> 0:06:52.594
<v Speaker 2>that they are going to be tested against one nation

0:06:52.633 --> 0:06:55.113
<v Speaker 2>because she's a regional southern New South Wales seat. They're

0:06:55.154 --> 0:06:57.313
<v Speaker 2>going to be tested against one nation for the first

0:06:57.354 --> 0:07:00.313
<v Speaker 2>time since the polls shifted. And so in a way

0:07:00.393 --> 0:07:03.474
<v Speaker 2>that is Susan Lee's very past agg way of going well,

0:07:03.553 --> 0:07:06.833
<v Speaker 2>fuck you, because I'm sure they would rather not be

0:07:06.873 --> 0:07:09.874
<v Speaker 2>fine an election that quickly in that seat.

0:07:09.914 --> 0:07:12.794
<v Speaker 5>But Susan Lee is gone nut. I'm We're handing you

0:07:12.874 --> 0:07:14.714
<v Speaker 5>the sad and I am walking away.

0:07:14.794 --> 0:07:16.074
<v Speaker 1>Could we say she flounced?

0:07:16.114 --> 0:07:17.793
<v Speaker 3>She floxd.

0:07:22.674 --> 0:07:26.394
<v Speaker 4>Wuthering Heights, the brand new film directed by Emerald Fanell,

0:07:27.234 --> 0:07:31.434
<v Speaker 4>starring our very own Margot Robbie and Jacob Lordie, smashed

0:07:31.634 --> 0:07:35.393
<v Speaker 4>the box office in its opening weekend. But despite the

0:07:35.434 --> 0:07:37.754
<v Speaker 4>hole that the film has on our culture right now,

0:07:37.834 --> 0:07:41.074
<v Speaker 4>from the press tour to the fashion to the very

0:07:41.234 --> 0:07:45.554
<v Speaker 4>thorny discussions about sex and power and the enduring appeal

0:07:45.594 --> 0:07:50.554
<v Speaker 4>of a very bad man, reviews are mixed. I'm not

0:07:50.634 --> 0:07:53.394
<v Speaker 4>sure if I have ever seen audience as this divided

0:07:53.474 --> 0:07:57.194
<v Speaker 4>in terms of like even critics going from one star

0:07:57.234 --> 0:07:58.514
<v Speaker 4>to five stars, right.

0:07:58.754 --> 0:08:01.194
<v Speaker 3>You almost don't know how the reviewer is going to go.

0:08:01.274 --> 0:08:02.634
<v Speaker 5>It's a Veggiem movie.

0:08:02.714 --> 0:08:03.074
<v Speaker 6>It is.

0:08:04.674 --> 0:08:05.154
<v Speaker 5>It movie?

0:08:05.314 --> 0:08:09.953
<v Speaker 4>Yes, So we read Nicki Gemmel's Color in the Australian.

0:08:10.953 --> 0:08:14.194
<v Speaker 4>She gave it a five star rating, saying she inhaled

0:08:14.194 --> 0:08:16.794
<v Speaker 4>it with her groin was how she put it, her

0:08:16.874 --> 0:08:20.674
<v Speaker 4>first five star rating ever for a film, whereas the

0:08:20.714 --> 0:08:24.314
<v Speaker 4>Independent gave it one star. They said Emerald Fanell's astonishingly

0:08:24.354 --> 0:08:27.874
<v Speaker 4>bad adaptation is like a limp Mills and Boon. Some

0:08:27.914 --> 0:08:31.154
<v Speaker 4>say the chemistry is outstanding, others say none exists between

0:08:31.234 --> 0:08:35.154
<v Speaker 4>Robbie and a Lordie. Another says Emily Bronte rolling in

0:08:35.194 --> 0:08:39.914
<v Speaker 4>her grave, while another says it's Fanelle's best film to date.

0:08:40.394 --> 0:08:43.234
<v Speaker 4>Now most people listening probably haven't seen it, right, It

0:08:43.274 --> 0:08:45.674
<v Speaker 4>only just came out. But what we did want to

0:08:45.714 --> 0:08:49.874
<v Speaker 4>talk about is the cultural phenomenon of this nineteenth century

0:08:49.914 --> 0:08:55.154
<v Speaker 4>classic and the re emergence of the bad man Holly.

0:08:55.594 --> 0:08:58.354
<v Speaker 4>Should you and I feel ashamed of how much we

0:08:58.434 --> 0:08:59.554
<v Speaker 4>loved it with our groin?

0:08:59.754 --> 0:09:00.154
<v Speaker 2>We should?

0:09:00.154 --> 0:09:00.594
<v Speaker 5>Definitely.

0:09:00.834 --> 0:09:04.794
<v Speaker 2>We are very bad feminists today, Jesse and I both

0:09:04.834 --> 0:09:06.874
<v Speaker 2>on the record, I believe of saying that we loved it,

0:09:07.194 --> 0:09:08.914
<v Speaker 2>I did love it. And I'm also on the record

0:09:08.914 --> 0:09:10.114
<v Speaker 2>of saying that I also love the book.

0:09:10.874 --> 0:09:11.914
<v Speaker 5>The thing that's really.

0:09:11.754 --> 0:09:15.034
<v Speaker 1>Less controversially, well except if you've read the book.

0:09:15.074 --> 0:09:18.713
<v Speaker 2>It's actually not less controversial because the book. People that

0:09:18.754 --> 0:09:21.434
<v Speaker 2>are doing a lot of huffing about bad men after

0:09:21.474 --> 0:09:24.833
<v Speaker 2>watching that and they're like, but he's mean and that

0:09:24.914 --> 0:09:28.554
<v Speaker 2>relationship looks unhealthy, and I'm like, maybe you should read

0:09:28.594 --> 0:09:32.154
<v Speaker 2>the book, like it gets a whole lot worse than that.

0:09:32.634 --> 0:09:34.194
<v Speaker 5>Not that that's a defense, but.

0:09:34.274 --> 0:09:37.514
<v Speaker 2>I think it's really interesting because there's no question the

0:09:37.554 --> 0:09:39.594
<v Speaker 2>way that this movie has been marketed. One of the

0:09:39.634 --> 0:09:42.274
<v Speaker 2>ways that Fanelle chose to market it was with the

0:09:42.314 --> 0:09:46.034
<v Speaker 2>words the greatest love story of our time. Right now,

0:09:46.114 --> 0:09:48.154
<v Speaker 2>I don't think that's ever what the book was. It's

0:09:48.194 --> 0:09:50.794
<v Speaker 2>never what it was pretending to be. It's a really dark,

0:09:50.914 --> 0:09:52.754
<v Speaker 2>twisted exploration.

0:09:52.234 --> 0:09:54.554
<v Speaker 5>Of all kinds of seedy things, but it.

0:09:54.514 --> 0:09:58.394
<v Speaker 2>Has this obsessive relationship at the heart of it. And

0:09:58.434 --> 0:10:01.874
<v Speaker 2>what's really interesting is seeing people grappling with that in

0:10:01.914 --> 0:10:04.953
<v Speaker 2>our culture now, where we have to absolutely unrightly in

0:10:04.994 --> 0:10:08.994
<v Speaker 2>many ways disclose that we are against relationships that don't

0:10:09.034 --> 0:10:13.074
<v Speaker 2>look healthy. There is nothing healthy about this relationship other

0:10:13.154 --> 0:10:18.194
<v Speaker 2>than their sex. Life, which looks very healthy in the

0:10:18.194 --> 0:10:19.833
<v Speaker 2>back of a carriage or up against a rock.

0:10:19.914 --> 0:10:20.834
<v Speaker 6>But apart from.

0:10:20.634 --> 0:10:24.914
<v Speaker 2>That, there's no question that Heathcliff is the archetype, possibly

0:10:24.914 --> 0:10:28.274
<v Speaker 2>one of the original archetypes, along with other Bronte heroes

0:10:28.314 --> 0:10:33.394
<v Speaker 2>like mister Rochester. For the brooding, tortured bad man.

0:10:33.994 --> 0:10:37.034
<v Speaker 4>Yes that women, there was almost a tongue in cheek

0:10:37.154 --> 0:10:39.554
<v Speaker 4>lusting after him that I felt like the whole theater

0:10:39.714 --> 0:10:44.674
<v Speaker 4>was almost laughing at because he was yeah, yeah, Amelia,

0:10:44.754 --> 0:10:46.074
<v Speaker 4>are you a five star review?

0:10:46.354 --> 0:10:49.834
<v Speaker 1>No, I hated it, And I want to be clear

0:10:50.074 --> 0:10:52.794
<v Speaker 1>that I'm not coming from a puritanical place, because I

0:10:52.874 --> 0:10:57.234
<v Speaker 1>did enjoy Saltburn, which is for Nell's second feature and

0:10:57.274 --> 0:11:03.274
<v Speaker 1>which was extremely sexual in many ways. What I object

0:11:03.314 --> 0:11:05.914
<v Speaker 1>to in this is that this movie is not sexy,

0:11:06.074 --> 0:11:08.554
<v Speaker 1>and yet I'm being constant told about how sexy it is.

0:11:08.634 --> 0:11:11.594
<v Speaker 2>Okay, but it's just a personal choice, Like I thought

0:11:11.594 --> 0:11:12.634
<v Speaker 2>it was really sexy.

0:11:12.714 --> 0:11:13.234
<v Speaker 3>Do you think?

0:11:13.354 --> 0:11:14.994
<v Speaker 4>And I wonder if this is what it comes down to,

0:11:15.234 --> 0:11:16.914
<v Speaker 4>is whether or not you thought, because I think it's

0:11:16.994 --> 0:11:19.994
<v Speaker 4>very female gaze, and it's whether or not you find

0:11:20.074 --> 0:11:23.594
<v Speaker 4>Jacob Alordie to be a sex god or not, or whether.

0:11:23.394 --> 0:11:26.234
<v Speaker 1>I find like raw eggs in sheets to be sexy.

0:11:26.354 --> 0:11:28.754
<v Speaker 1>I think that's hard to clean up, and.

0:11:28.954 --> 0:11:31.154
<v Speaker 3>About that so much about clean.

0:11:32.434 --> 0:11:35.714
<v Speaker 1>And that's an issue because I've got enough laundry already.

0:11:36.434 --> 0:11:38.674
<v Speaker 1>The problem is that she called it the greatest loster

0:11:38.754 --> 0:11:41.034
<v Speaker 1>of our time. You know, I don't think that this

0:11:41.154 --> 0:11:44.034
<v Speaker 1>book was ever meant to be a great cluster. It's

0:11:44.074 --> 0:11:48.114
<v Speaker 1>an exploration of how love can yes be toxic, to

0:11:48.234 --> 0:11:51.474
<v Speaker 1>use a very modern term. And it's also about race

0:11:51.794 --> 0:11:55.314
<v Speaker 1>and sex and class and all these topics that basically

0:11:55.314 --> 0:11:58.034
<v Speaker 1>got pushed aside on trauma just so that we could

0:11:58.114 --> 0:12:00.234
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of shots of there's so much food

0:12:00.274 --> 0:12:02.434
<v Speaker 1>in this movie that I'm meant to find sexy. The egg,

0:12:02.714 --> 0:12:05.434
<v Speaker 1>the jelly, Margot, Robbie puts her finger in some jelly.

0:12:05.434 --> 0:12:07.834
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of jelly happening. It just made me

0:12:07.954 --> 0:12:10.514
<v Speaker 1>long for baby girl. Remember Nicole Kidman's the movie where

0:12:10.554 --> 0:12:13.394
<v Speaker 1>she had the affair with the younger man and he

0:12:13.554 --> 0:12:16.754
<v Speaker 1>drank a glass of milk. That's sexy. Don't ask me why,

0:12:16.794 --> 0:12:17.914
<v Speaker 1>but that was sexy.

0:12:18.114 --> 0:12:20.434
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I do think that was I do think that

0:12:20.474 --> 0:12:20.954
<v Speaker 3>was sexy.

0:12:20.954 --> 0:12:25.314
<v Speaker 4>But I have a theory about why this has been

0:12:25.514 --> 0:12:29.754
<v Speaker 4>such a cultural phenomenon, right, because I mean because we've

0:12:29.754 --> 0:12:32.434
<v Speaker 4>been forced to consume it like at all times for

0:12:32.474 --> 0:12:35.514
<v Speaker 4>the last three months. Margot Robbie seems capable of something

0:12:35.554 --> 0:12:38.434
<v Speaker 4>that just about no other actor can do, which is

0:12:38.474 --> 0:12:42.514
<v Speaker 4>that she inspires a movement like Barber was a movement.

0:12:42.754 --> 0:12:47.114
<v Speaker 4>This is true from fashion to conversations to everything. You

0:12:47.234 --> 0:12:49.794
<v Speaker 4>just go this is what every movie whish is they

0:12:49.834 --> 0:12:50.274
<v Speaker 4>could be.

0:12:50.394 --> 0:12:55.714
<v Speaker 2>She's incredibly smart about so clever projects, directors, scripts like

0:12:55.754 --> 0:12:57.594
<v Speaker 2>because the thing is about this is it's the Emerald

0:12:57.634 --> 0:13:01.114
<v Speaker 2>finale of it all right. Yeah, Saltburn was controversial, Saltburn

0:13:01.194 --> 0:13:04.074
<v Speaker 2>was over the top, Saltburn was silly. This takes all

0:13:04.114 --> 0:13:06.754
<v Speaker 2>those themes and turns up to eleven. Then you add

0:13:06.754 --> 0:13:10.514
<v Speaker 2>in ready made culture war argument really about whether or

0:13:10.554 --> 0:13:12.034
<v Speaker 2>not this is a love story, whether or not it's

0:13:12.074 --> 0:13:14.154
<v Speaker 2>good role modeling, whether or not we should have adapted

0:13:14.194 --> 0:13:16.114
<v Speaker 2>a classic in the first place, And you have got

0:13:16.194 --> 0:13:18.194
<v Speaker 2>an instant vibe.

0:13:18.234 --> 0:13:20.554
<v Speaker 1>Well you've got another layer too, which is she just

0:13:20.634 --> 0:13:22.754
<v Speaker 1>also had to look at the fact that women are

0:13:22.794 --> 0:13:26.953
<v Speaker 1>reading smart in huge numbers, and that's just a ready

0:13:26.994 --> 0:13:28.194
<v Speaker 1>made audience for it too.

0:13:28.314 --> 0:13:29.394
<v Speaker 3>But I wonder too.

0:13:29.914 --> 0:13:32.914
<v Speaker 4>My theory is that in a world that is being

0:13:33.034 --> 0:13:38.914
<v Speaker 4>taken over by AI. So design to video, to ads,

0:13:39.194 --> 0:13:43.754
<v Speaker 4>to fonts, to films to whatever, there's a almost like

0:13:43.794 --> 0:13:45.634
<v Speaker 4>a banality to a lot of it that is all

0:13:45.674 --> 0:13:48.593
<v Speaker 4>starting to look the same. They say that AI generated

0:13:48.634 --> 0:13:51.834
<v Speaker 4>means that all writing starts to sound the same. That

0:13:51.874 --> 0:13:56.354
<v Speaker 4>sort of thing in order to cut through the genre

0:13:56.434 --> 0:13:59.674
<v Speaker 4>that seems to be as sending right now is absurdist.

0:14:00.074 --> 0:14:02.234
<v Speaker 4>So the best comedy show I saw last year was

0:14:02.234 --> 0:14:08.114
<v Speaker 4>the most absurd, ridiculous, unexplainable thing and had nudity in it,

0:14:08.154 --> 0:14:09.994
<v Speaker 4>and it was whatever happened in that room could never

0:14:10.034 --> 0:14:11.874
<v Speaker 4>be replicated again. And I was like, oh, this is

0:14:11.914 --> 0:14:15.514
<v Speaker 4>the anti AI revoultion Gary Starr and he does this

0:14:15.554 --> 0:14:18.114
<v Speaker 4>Penguin classic show. It's coming back to Australia. You have

0:14:18.154 --> 0:14:19.514
<v Speaker 4>to see it, and it's gone around the world and

0:14:19.514 --> 0:14:23.314
<v Speaker 4>it's won every award right, And I just think that

0:14:23.434 --> 0:14:30.674
<v Speaker 4>watching this I went there is something so ridiculous, over

0:14:30.714 --> 0:14:31.594
<v Speaker 4>the top.

0:14:32.114 --> 0:14:33.634
<v Speaker 3>Edgy, weird.

0:14:34.354 --> 0:14:39.714
<v Speaker 4>Even kinks like AI can't predict the weirdness of human kinks, right,

0:14:40.314 --> 0:14:42.394
<v Speaker 4>And so I think that that's part of what we're

0:14:42.434 --> 0:14:45.194
<v Speaker 4>just loving. And it's Marty Supreme falls into the same category,

0:14:45.194 --> 0:14:48.874
<v Speaker 4>which is just this weirdness that a robot could never.

0:14:48.834 --> 0:14:50.514
<v Speaker 2>I think it's like, if I'm going to leave my

0:14:50.594 --> 0:14:53.434
<v Speaker 2>house and I'm going to go sit in a theater.

0:14:53.274 --> 0:14:54.914
<v Speaker 5>For too long, let's be on the record with that.

0:14:55.034 --> 0:14:57.154
<v Speaker 2>Like my main complaint if I have a complaint about

0:14:57.194 --> 0:14:59.554
<v Speaker 2>this movie is it could have easily shaved past for

0:14:59.554 --> 0:15:01.554
<v Speaker 2>an hour and nobody it would have been fine. But

0:15:01.634 --> 0:15:03.474
<v Speaker 2>if I'm going to go and do that, what I

0:15:03.514 --> 0:15:05.474
<v Speaker 2>want is an experience. And now I want a good time.

0:15:05.554 --> 0:15:08.074
<v Speaker 2>And I got that with Marty Supreme. I was in

0:15:08.114 --> 0:15:10.834
<v Speaker 2>that movie theater like kind of it wasn't a perfect film,

0:15:10.874 --> 0:15:12.154
<v Speaker 2>but I was gasping.

0:15:12.474 --> 0:15:16.314
<v Speaker 4>I was like, no way, it was unpredictability and this

0:15:16.474 --> 0:15:16.914
<v Speaker 4>was the same.

0:15:17.314 --> 0:15:19.314
<v Speaker 2>I got a really good time in that room. I

0:15:19.354 --> 0:15:20.754
<v Speaker 2>just want to go back to Bad Men for a

0:15:20.754 --> 0:15:22.594
<v Speaker 2>moment because I'm seeing a lot of hot takes. I

0:15:22.594 --> 0:15:24.514
<v Speaker 2>think we might be putting on on Mamma Mia today

0:15:24.634 --> 0:15:27.634
<v Speaker 2>about how we all need to remember that in real

0:15:27.674 --> 0:15:30.634
<v Speaker 2>life Heathcliffs are bad and they are right, there is

0:15:30.674 --> 0:15:33.554
<v Speaker 2>no question right. The archetype of that man who loves

0:15:33.594 --> 0:15:36.874
<v Speaker 2>you so much he will do anything for you, you know,

0:15:36.994 --> 0:15:40.114
<v Speaker 2>including hurt everyone in the world, including you, and himself

0:15:40.114 --> 0:15:44.834
<v Speaker 2>and everything in fantasy is great. In reality, as those

0:15:44.874 --> 0:15:49.634
<v Speaker 2>of us who've had the misfortune to experience it is toxic, controlling, awful,

0:15:49.754 --> 0:15:52.954
<v Speaker 2>veers into violence, not to be encouraged. But let's give

0:15:52.994 --> 0:15:56.394
<v Speaker 2>women the respect of knowing that they're smart and they

0:15:56.434 --> 0:15:58.954
<v Speaker 2>know the difference between fantasy and reality. I think we've

0:15:58.954 --> 0:16:03.554
<v Speaker 2>been talking heats lately about obsessive fandoms, like around heated rivalry,

0:16:03.794 --> 0:16:07.874
<v Speaker 2>around pop music, around all kinds of things. There's something

0:16:08.034 --> 0:16:12.114
<v Speaker 2>about female desire that can be very powerful and obsessive,

0:16:12.554 --> 0:16:15.434
<v Speaker 2>and we're always looking for like safe places to put that.

0:16:16.154 --> 0:16:19.474
<v Speaker 2>And I think it's okay for us to lose ourselves

0:16:19.514 --> 0:16:22.074
<v Speaker 2>in a heathcliff for a couple of hours and for

0:16:22.114 --> 0:16:25.474
<v Speaker 2>it not to mean that we really wish that we

0:16:25.514 --> 0:16:27.794
<v Speaker 2>are in a terrible, controlling, abusive relationship.

0:16:27.834 --> 0:16:29.474
<v Speaker 5>I think we've got that.

0:16:29.714 --> 0:16:31.834
<v Speaker 2>And when women are making their own art, which this

0:16:32.034 --> 0:16:35.674
<v Speaker 2>is written by a woman, produced by a woman, directed

0:16:35.674 --> 0:16:38.634
<v Speaker 2>by a woman, and it's playing with these dangerous tropes,

0:16:38.674 --> 0:16:39.994
<v Speaker 2>I think that's fine.

0:16:40.114 --> 0:16:42.274
<v Speaker 4>Do you think it's also a bit of a backlash

0:16:42.674 --> 0:16:47.674
<v Speaker 4>to a trend we've had over films, certainly since Me Too,

0:16:47.714 --> 0:16:51.354
<v Speaker 4>but longer than that, which are didactic in a lot

0:16:51.354 --> 0:16:55.154
<v Speaker 4>of ways about how our relationships ought to look feminist overtones,

0:16:55.194 --> 0:16:58.594
<v Speaker 4>which is great, but the pendulum seems to have swung

0:16:58.634 --> 0:17:01.034
<v Speaker 4>a little bit and gone, what if we were to

0:17:01.074 --> 0:17:03.714
<v Speaker 4>just lean into the naughtiness which we saw with fifty Shades?

0:17:03.754 --> 0:17:08.114
<v Speaker 4>That absolutely worked, how provocative it is, and I think

0:17:08.194 --> 0:17:10.434
<v Speaker 4>that's why there were moments where everyone was laughing because

0:17:10.474 --> 0:17:13.194
<v Speaker 4>they were just like, we know that this isn't good

0:17:13.274 --> 0:17:16.234
<v Speaker 4>for us, but can't we just look at it and

0:17:17.394 --> 0:17:20.234
<v Speaker 4>think that Jacob a Lordie looks hot with his shirt?

0:17:20.394 --> 0:17:23.554
<v Speaker 1>Laughter was more we were embarrassed because there's so much

0:17:23.754 --> 0:17:27.554
<v Speaker 1>repression in that movie. The movie is about like subliminating

0:17:27.594 --> 0:17:31.434
<v Speaker 1>sexual desire into things like egg yolks or aspect, you know.

0:17:31.674 --> 0:17:34.194
<v Speaker 1>And I think that we're embarrassed on behalf of the

0:17:34.234 --> 0:17:36.394
<v Speaker 1>people in it because we know how hard they were

0:17:36.434 --> 0:17:38.114
<v Speaker 1>pressing their true emotions.

0:17:38.314 --> 0:17:40.234
<v Speaker 4>Was part of why you didn't like it that you

0:17:40.394 --> 0:17:44.834
<v Speaker 4>felt as though it was like dangerous for women, Like

0:17:44.914 --> 0:17:45.994
<v Speaker 4>did you think that it was.

0:17:46.074 --> 0:17:48.834
<v Speaker 1>A bit yeah, a bit, yeah, Yeah, I think that's true.

0:17:48.914 --> 0:17:51.674
<v Speaker 1>I thought it was a little bit like you will

0:17:51.714 --> 0:17:55.114
<v Speaker 1>find this sexy, and you know what's not sexy? People

0:17:55.154 --> 0:17:59.474
<v Speaker 1>telling you incessantly that something is sexy like that problem.

0:17:59.834 --> 0:18:02.714
<v Speaker 2>Also women on a homogeneous blop like some of us

0:18:02.754 --> 0:18:04.874
<v Speaker 2>will find that very sexy and some of us will not.

0:18:04.994 --> 0:18:07.634
<v Speaker 2>Some of us will be thinking about a lordie lifting

0:18:07.674 --> 0:18:09.434
<v Speaker 2>her up by a corset strings, and some of us

0:18:09.514 --> 0:18:09.834
<v Speaker 2>will not.

0:18:10.034 --> 0:18:11.834
<v Speaker 1>I also couldn't understand what he was saying a lot

0:18:11.834 --> 0:18:16.634
<v Speaker 1>of the time. It was to being and I was like,

0:18:16.674 --> 0:18:19.194
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, Jacob, what what did you just say?

0:18:19.554 --> 0:18:21.594
<v Speaker 2>Maybe this part of why this is my movie is

0:18:21.634 --> 0:18:22.593
<v Speaker 2>that Yorkshire accent.

0:18:22.874 --> 0:18:27.874
<v Speaker 5>Oh my god, it was really good. I just think

0:18:27.914 --> 0:18:30.194
<v Speaker 5>it's like these heroes pop up.

0:18:30.234 --> 0:18:32.634
<v Speaker 2>We know they're bad for us, Edward and Twilight, Noah

0:18:32.714 --> 0:18:34.994
<v Speaker 2>in the notebook, they'll be think pieces about like girls.

0:18:35.034 --> 0:18:36.474
<v Speaker 5>Remember I'm working.

0:18:36.674 --> 0:18:38.074
<v Speaker 3>You don't want a heath click, and.

0:18:38.034 --> 0:18:40.634
<v Speaker 2>That's fine, you actually do not want to hear I

0:18:40.634 --> 0:18:44.394
<v Speaker 2>will be on the record, but it's okay. Lose yourself

0:18:44.474 --> 0:18:45.794
<v Speaker 2>in it for a couple of hours.

0:18:45.834 --> 0:18:46.714
<v Speaker 3>I completely agree.

0:18:46.834 --> 0:18:47.274
<v Speaker 5>Loved it.

0:18:47.674 --> 0:18:50.033
<v Speaker 2>If you have seen Weathering heights, or if you were

0:18:50.074 --> 0:18:51.874
<v Speaker 2>wondering whether or not to see Weathering heights, we are

0:18:51.914 --> 0:18:53.954
<v Speaker 2>going to go I'm not going to say deep I was.

0:18:54.114 --> 0:18:55.954
<v Speaker 5>We're going to say deep in amiliates like don't. I'm like,

0:18:55.994 --> 0:18:56.514
<v Speaker 5>you're fair.

0:18:57.394 --> 0:19:00.354
<v Speaker 2>We are going to go in depth into Wathering Heights

0:19:00.394 --> 0:19:03.634
<v Speaker 2>with Mia tomorrow, Amelia and myself. Amelia didn't like it,

0:19:03.714 --> 0:19:05.594
<v Speaker 2>me who loved it. But also a bit of behind

0:19:05.594 --> 0:19:07.914
<v Speaker 2>the scenes gossip, a bit of industry stuff, a bit of.

0:19:07.994 --> 0:19:10.354
<v Speaker 5>Margo, a bit of all that stuff.

0:19:10.394 --> 0:19:13.914
<v Speaker 2>All on tomorrow's subscriber episode stilled by our very own

0:19:13.994 --> 0:19:14.553
<v Speaker 2>ma of Friedman.

0:19:15.554 --> 0:19:19.034
<v Speaker 1>After the break, the substack about beauty routines, which has

0:19:19.074 --> 0:19:29.273
<v Speaker 1>me thinking that none of this is fun anymore. I

0:19:29.434 --> 0:19:32.273
<v Speaker 1>like reading fashion substacks by people with better taste than

0:19:32.314 --> 0:19:34.074
<v Speaker 1>me so I can figure out what to wear. It's

0:19:34.154 --> 0:19:35.754
<v Speaker 1>kind of a guilty pleasure of mine. And one of

0:19:35.794 --> 0:19:38.714
<v Speaker 1>them is called Magazine, and it's written by a woman

0:19:38.874 --> 0:19:41.513
<v Speaker 1>named Laura Riley. Now I looked up her age before this,

0:19:41.674 --> 0:19:44.274
<v Speaker 1>but she doesn't disclose her age, which gosh, I wish

0:19:44.314 --> 0:19:47.274
<v Speaker 1>I didn't disclose my age. But it's very much out

0:19:47.314 --> 0:19:49.354
<v Speaker 1>there if you'd like to find out what it is anyway,

0:19:49.394 --> 0:19:51.314
<v Speaker 1>If I had to guess, she's probably in her late thirties,

0:19:51.674 --> 0:19:55.594
<v Speaker 1>and she wrote something recently which kind of depressed me

0:19:55.754 --> 0:19:58.594
<v Speaker 1>and made me never want to read about people's skincare

0:19:58.634 --> 0:20:03.114
<v Speaker 1>routines again. She wrote the following in January alone. I've

0:20:03.154 --> 0:20:09.874
<v Speaker 1>done botox, m face IPL scheduled moxy broadband, seeing my orthodontist, cardiologist,

0:20:10.074 --> 0:20:16.594
<v Speaker 1>gp obg wyn, ophthalmologist, dermatologists, plastic surgeon, trainer, and Polate's instructor.

0:20:17.154 --> 0:20:20.314
<v Speaker 1>I've renewed my health insurance and MEDSPA membership. I don't

0:20:20.354 --> 0:20:23.954
<v Speaker 1>know what a medspy ownership is. I've drawn blood three times,

0:20:24.154 --> 0:20:26.794
<v Speaker 1>that's too many times to draw blood and given two

0:20:26.994 --> 0:20:30.594
<v Speaker 1>urine samples. My current skincare routine is six to eight steps.

0:20:30.594 --> 0:20:34.234
<v Speaker 1>My daily supplement stack is seventeen pills, twenty on mondays

0:20:34.394 --> 0:20:37.674
<v Speaker 1>and a peptide. And I've engaged at least five high

0:20:37.674 --> 0:20:41.194
<v Speaker 1>tech tools from my home device library. I've tracked every

0:20:41.234 --> 0:20:44.874
<v Speaker 1>meal macro and relevant micro nutrient. I still do all

0:20:44.914 --> 0:20:47.874
<v Speaker 1>of this macro macro. It's not the question I had

0:20:47.874 --> 0:20:50.273
<v Speaker 1>for breakfast this morning. All of this, and I consider

0:20:50.354 --> 0:20:52.754
<v Speaker 1>myself pretty healthy and not hypochondriac.

0:20:53.674 --> 0:20:56.634
<v Speaker 5>So, my god, I just does she have a job.

0:20:58.714 --> 0:21:00.474
<v Speaker 5>I just thought, is this.

0:21:00.434 --> 0:21:01.554
<v Speaker 1>What we're doing now?

0:21:01.634 --> 0:21:01.954
<v Speaker 5>Holly?

0:21:02.634 --> 0:21:04.514
<v Speaker 1>How are you going? Are you doing this? Well?

0:21:04.554 --> 0:21:05.474
<v Speaker 5>It is what we're doing now.

0:21:05.474 --> 0:21:07.634
<v Speaker 2>It's not what I'm doing now, but I've I'm doing

0:21:07.674 --> 0:21:09.594
<v Speaker 2>well if I've got like a serum and a moisturizer,

0:21:09.634 --> 0:21:12.074
<v Speaker 2>and I might look at me go, but this is

0:21:12.074 --> 0:21:15.674
<v Speaker 2>everywhere I'm looking. At the moment, I was on my Instagram.

0:21:15.914 --> 0:21:19.114
<v Speaker 2>On my Instagram Emma Greed, Who's somebody I like to follow.

0:21:19.194 --> 0:21:21.434
<v Speaker 2>She is, you know, the Skim's Boss lady, who's like

0:21:21.474 --> 0:21:24.154
<v Speaker 2>the archetype of the girl boss of the moment. She's

0:21:24.154 --> 0:21:25.914
<v Speaker 2>just got had a book out about it and stuff.

0:21:26.234 --> 0:21:30.074
<v Speaker 2>She posted her regimen, like just her supplements regiment. She

0:21:30.234 --> 0:21:34.354
<v Speaker 2>takes sixteen different pills every day, some of the morning,

0:21:34.354 --> 0:21:37.154
<v Speaker 2>some for night, which is something I'm suddenly seeing everywhere. Yeah,

0:21:37.554 --> 0:21:39.874
<v Speaker 2>the discussion about it and then all these different pills

0:21:39.874 --> 0:21:40.394
<v Speaker 2>and potions.

0:21:40.674 --> 0:21:41.474
<v Speaker 5>Some of it is.

0:21:41.474 --> 0:21:44.794
<v Speaker 2>Under the guise of longevity, which is something I'm seeing

0:21:44.834 --> 0:21:46.793
<v Speaker 2>a lot, particularly with women at the minute. We all

0:21:46.874 --> 0:21:50.034
<v Speaker 2>know that the longevity craze kind of really started taking

0:21:50.034 --> 0:21:52.394
<v Speaker 2>hold in the bro culture of Silicon Valley, but now

0:21:52.514 --> 0:21:55.754
<v Speaker 2>it's very much kind of merging with beauty standards to

0:21:55.794 --> 0:21:59.674
<v Speaker 2>become something women a I ungenerously think it's the new

0:22:00.074 --> 0:22:02.634
<v Speaker 2>You can't say anti aging anymore, because we've all got

0:22:02.674 --> 0:22:07.834
<v Speaker 2>to be age positive, but longevity sounds in a positive

0:22:07.834 --> 0:22:10.594
<v Speaker 2>and healthy but really it's the same and I'm seeing

0:22:10.594 --> 0:22:14.793
<v Speaker 2>this everywhere, as well as the Miranda Curz, the Trinny

0:22:14.794 --> 0:22:17.914
<v Speaker 2>Goodles of it all who are wearing their what's Triny doing?

0:22:18.074 --> 0:22:20.634
<v Speaker 2>She took a picture of herself in the morning the

0:22:20.634 --> 0:22:23.234
<v Speaker 2>other day wearing her infra red mask, some kind of

0:22:23.354 --> 0:22:26.754
<v Speaker 2>helmet that had red light underneath it. She was like,

0:22:26.954 --> 0:22:31.794
<v Speaker 2>just all of these ye like Mia has, and she's

0:22:31.834 --> 0:22:32.954
<v Speaker 2>just getting about her day.

0:22:32.834 --> 0:22:36.754
<v Speaker 4>Looking It's like a board that you stand on that

0:22:36.834 --> 0:22:39.834
<v Speaker 4>apparently is good for bone density, and it just it's

0:22:39.874 --> 0:22:41.154
<v Speaker 4>like a vibrating.

0:22:40.674 --> 0:22:42.114
<v Speaker 5>Boarde the emint to stand on.

0:22:42.834 --> 0:22:44.833
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I don't even know where to start, because

0:22:45.034 --> 0:22:48.194
<v Speaker 4>the first thing when you read out all of those

0:22:48.234 --> 0:22:50.874
<v Speaker 4>appointments and all the people I've seen, is the conflation

0:22:51.194 --> 0:22:56.474
<v Speaker 4>of beauty and health. Like seeing your GP is not

0:22:56.754 --> 0:23:01.073
<v Speaker 4>the same as seeing a facialist. They are just completely

0:23:01.114 --> 0:23:04.194
<v Speaker 4>different things. The other thing I noticed was the use

0:23:04.234 --> 0:23:10.474
<v Speaker 4>of my GP my ophthalmologist begyn, which indicates you can't

0:23:10.474 --> 0:23:13.274
<v Speaker 4>talk about this stuff without going There is such enormous privilege,

0:23:13.274 --> 0:23:16.994
<v Speaker 4>particularly in the States, of having your own specialist doctors,

0:23:17.034 --> 0:23:21.914
<v Speaker 4>like most people who genuinely have a heart issue, would

0:23:21.994 --> 0:23:25.154
<v Speaker 4>struggle to pay for cardiologists, Like the healthcare system is

0:23:25.194 --> 0:23:29.194
<v Speaker 4>totally broken, and I like cringe at the idea of

0:23:29.234 --> 0:23:31.994
<v Speaker 4>her having a cardiologist to go and check that her

0:23:31.994 --> 0:23:34.314
<v Speaker 4>thirty something year old heart is great.

0:23:34.794 --> 0:23:37.194
<v Speaker 5>I think it's status, right, A status.

0:23:37.194 --> 0:23:41.194
<v Speaker 2>Emma Read's massive collection of pills and potions is status.

0:23:41.234 --> 0:23:43.234
<v Speaker 1>She has so many of them that, according to that

0:23:43.274 --> 0:23:47.874
<v Speaker 1>Instagram caption, she pays her child to organize her supplements

0:23:47.914 --> 0:23:48.314
<v Speaker 1>for her.

0:23:49.114 --> 0:23:51.954
<v Speaker 3>And I think it's like, what what is all this about?

0:23:52.154 --> 0:23:54.634
<v Speaker 4>Is it about an ultimate fear of death, which is

0:23:54.754 --> 0:24:00.154
<v Speaker 4>like the longevity science stuff. I find the rhetoric of

0:24:00.234 --> 0:24:03.234
<v Speaker 4>like scientific language around this to be a little bit

0:24:03.794 --> 0:24:06.674
<v Speaker 4>disingenuous because it's like you're just putting goo on your face.

0:24:06.674 --> 0:24:12.114
<v Speaker 1>What all of this is about is about looking hot. Yes,

0:24:12.594 --> 0:24:16.954
<v Speaker 1>it's just vanity. Because there's a term for what this

0:24:17.114 --> 0:24:20.834
<v Speaker 1>is called, and it looks maxing. And the definition of

0:24:20.874 --> 0:24:24.714
<v Speaker 1>looks maxing is trying to raise your social, your sexual

0:24:24.794 --> 0:24:29.834
<v Speaker 1>market value by optimizing your attractiveness. This is absolutely something

0:24:29.874 --> 0:24:30.914
<v Speaker 1>Heathcliff would have loved.

0:24:31.354 --> 0:24:33.313
<v Speaker 2>But I was going to say, that's not a new idea.

0:24:33.394 --> 0:24:35.274
<v Speaker 2>We've just got all these new ways to do it right,

0:24:35.274 --> 0:24:37.874
<v Speaker 2>so hot people have always enjoyed a lot of status.

0:24:38.114 --> 0:24:40.594
<v Speaker 4>There was a line in that in that substack that

0:24:40.714 --> 0:24:44.594
<v Speaker 4>was like, my group chats are planning out cos medical tourism,

0:24:44.874 --> 0:24:46.554
<v Speaker 4>and I bet yours are too, And.

0:24:46.514 --> 0:24:47.474
<v Speaker 3>I was like, is this satire?

0:24:47.554 --> 0:24:48.034
<v Speaker 5>This is a funny.

0:24:48.034 --> 0:24:50.874
<v Speaker 1>I'm not in your group chat, but is that what

0:24:50.874 --> 0:24:51.714
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about?

0:24:52.234 --> 0:24:54.434
<v Speaker 4>Generally, it's trying to find a tie place for dinner.

0:24:54.594 --> 0:24:56.674
<v Speaker 4>It's not looking at where we're going to go in

0:24:56.674 --> 0:24:58.874
<v Speaker 4>the world to get some ridiculous new face.

0:24:58.994 --> 0:25:01.794
<v Speaker 1>But the key thing is that men are getting involved

0:25:01.834 --> 0:25:05.434
<v Speaker 1>in this now too. And there's a guy called Clovicula.

0:25:05.594 --> 0:25:08.313
<v Speaker 1>I kept seeing this word and just it was a

0:25:08.354 --> 0:25:10.474
<v Speaker 1>news story that I wanted to opt out of. But

0:25:10.514 --> 0:25:12.234
<v Speaker 1>in the end I just had to read about him

0:25:12.274 --> 0:25:15.754
<v Speaker 1>because I kept seeing him everywhere. He is a young

0:25:15.834 --> 0:25:19.154
<v Speaker 1>man who gets his name because apparently the length of

0:25:19.194 --> 0:25:22.234
<v Speaker 1>his clavicle is ideal. If you'd like to know what

0:25:22.274 --> 0:25:24.513
<v Speaker 1>it is, it's nineteen point five inches. I don't know

0:25:24.554 --> 0:25:26.994
<v Speaker 1>what that is in metric. And the other reason why

0:25:27.034 --> 0:25:30.074
<v Speaker 1>apparently he's really handsome is because his chin to filterrim

0:25:30.194 --> 0:25:33.354
<v Speaker 1>ratio is two point six. The filterrim is those two

0:25:33.434 --> 0:25:34.634
<v Speaker 1>lines underneath your nose.

0:25:34.754 --> 0:25:36.234
<v Speaker 3>So this is like that golden ratio.

0:25:37.274 --> 0:25:41.234
<v Speaker 1>Yeah yeah, And so he is apparently like the perfect man.

0:25:41.394 --> 0:25:43.954
<v Speaker 1>I'm putting this all in quote marks, just like Emerald

0:25:43.994 --> 0:25:46.634
<v Speaker 1>Vanell with Wuthering Heights. He's meant to be the most

0:25:46.674 --> 0:25:49.194
<v Speaker 1>handsome man. He earns more than one hundred thousand dollars

0:25:49.234 --> 0:25:51.273
<v Speaker 1>a month teaching men how to be handsome, and he

0:25:51.314 --> 0:25:54.434
<v Speaker 1>promises them that if they follow everything, they're going to

0:25:54.474 --> 0:25:57.754
<v Speaker 1>get a lot of sleave maxing. Yes, slave maxing that

0:25:57.874 --> 0:26:02.114
<v Speaker 1>means a lot of sex like slag axing. No, I'm sorry,

0:26:02.274 --> 0:26:04.154
<v Speaker 1>we live in twenty twenty six. What do you want

0:26:04.154 --> 0:26:06.313
<v Speaker 1>from me? This is why Wuthering Heights is such a

0:26:06.314 --> 0:26:07.354
<v Speaker 1>blessed a scale.

0:26:07.314 --> 0:26:08.074
<v Speaker 5>It really is.

0:26:08.274 --> 0:26:12.914
<v Speaker 4>It is a full time job. Like the intensive labor

0:26:13.154 --> 0:26:16.474
<v Speaker 4>involved in this is out of control.

0:26:16.514 --> 0:26:20.114
<v Speaker 1>Okay, but Devil's Advocate. Isn't it a good thing now

0:26:20.194 --> 0:26:24.033
<v Speaker 1>that men are also being hemmed in and oppressed by

0:26:24.034 --> 0:26:24.914
<v Speaker 1>beauty standards?

0:26:24.954 --> 0:26:29.793
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to our hell, right. I know it's not like

0:26:30.114 --> 0:26:32.674
<v Speaker 2>I'm joking, because I do sometimes get a little bit

0:26:32.754 --> 0:26:35.754
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna say it wrong, shash and freud. It's one

0:26:35.754 --> 0:26:42.314
<v Speaker 2>of the out loud words we can't say shut when

0:26:42.354 --> 0:26:44.394
<v Speaker 2>I see this because I'm like, yeah, men, we have

0:26:44.434 --> 0:26:47.394
<v Speaker 2>been dealing with this forever. And there is also an

0:26:47.594 --> 0:26:50.994
<v Speaker 2>argument that we've kind of danced around before, which is

0:26:50.994 --> 0:26:54.273
<v Speaker 2>isn't it good that now the effort that people are

0:26:54.314 --> 0:26:57.994
<v Speaker 2>putting in the effort the cost the energy cost that

0:26:57.994 --> 0:27:00.594
<v Speaker 2>they're putting in, Because there's the literal cost, But then

0:27:00.594 --> 0:27:03.314
<v Speaker 2>there is the time, the list that you read out earlier,

0:27:03.474 --> 0:27:06.434
<v Speaker 2>Amelia of what that writer is doing, the amount of

0:27:06.434 --> 0:27:10.273
<v Speaker 2>time and thought and priority that other things that have

0:27:10.354 --> 0:27:13.594
<v Speaker 2>to be pushed aside for that. In a way, there's

0:27:13.594 --> 0:27:16.794
<v Speaker 2>something almost healthy about that, because we used to all

0:27:16.834 --> 0:27:20.634
<v Speaker 2>have to pretend that beauty was effortless, and the most

0:27:20.714 --> 0:27:23.954
<v Speaker 2>high status beauty was always effortless beauty, and like being

0:27:24.034 --> 0:27:27.634
<v Speaker 2>born blessed to look like Giselle was kind of the

0:27:27.714 --> 0:27:32.114
<v Speaker 2>pinnacle of status. Whereas now it can be bought. It

0:27:32.154 --> 0:27:33.954
<v Speaker 2>can be bought in lots of ways. It can be

0:27:33.994 --> 0:27:36.434
<v Speaker 2>brought with the surgeon, it can be bought with medications,

0:27:36.474 --> 0:27:39.554
<v Speaker 2>it can be bought with tweakments and serums and injectables,

0:27:40.474 --> 0:27:43.274
<v Speaker 2>and so that's kind of democratizing, and it also pulls

0:27:43.314 --> 0:27:45.033
<v Speaker 2>the curtain back a bit. It makes me think all

0:27:45.034 --> 0:27:46.034
<v Speaker 2>the time. I have this boyfriend.

0:27:46.034 --> 0:27:48.554
<v Speaker 5>Once he probably was a bit toxic, little bit Heathcliff,

0:27:48.594 --> 0:27:49.994
<v Speaker 5>not all the way Heathcliff, little bit.

0:27:50.114 --> 0:27:52.394
<v Speaker 2>Who I remember him describing this woman once and saying

0:27:52.434 --> 0:27:54.273
<v Speaker 2>how hot she was, And he said, I love the

0:27:54.274 --> 0:27:56.273
<v Speaker 2>way her hair's like falling out of her bun. And

0:27:56.314 --> 0:27:59.073
<v Speaker 2>then he said, unless she's done that on purpose. If

0:27:59.154 --> 0:28:01.834
<v Speaker 2>she's done that on purpose, not hot anymore, Like you

0:28:01.834 --> 0:28:04.994
<v Speaker 2>know what I mean. So the effortlessness and that oh

0:28:05.034 --> 0:28:06.914
<v Speaker 2>I just happened to be gorgeous used to be the

0:28:06.874 --> 0:28:09.554
<v Speaker 2>beauty standard, and now it feels like the beauty standard

0:28:09.674 --> 0:28:13.553
<v Speaker 2>is I have created this version of myself. Look how

0:28:13.594 --> 0:28:14.634
<v Speaker 2>hard I've worked at it.

0:28:15.354 --> 0:28:17.994
<v Speaker 4>I reckon it's more sinister because I think implicit within

0:28:18.034 --> 0:28:22.313
<v Speaker 4>it is that looking after yourself is a virtue. And

0:28:22.394 --> 0:28:25.114
<v Speaker 4>I find that and maybe it's my Catholic roots showing

0:28:25.154 --> 0:28:28.354
<v Speaker 4>and that it's visible. Yes, if you are spending eight

0:28:28.394 --> 0:28:32.033
<v Speaker 4>hours a day trying to be let's all be honest hotter,

0:28:32.874 --> 0:28:35.154
<v Speaker 4>I think that's a I don't want to say, a

0:28:35.274 --> 0:28:38.634
<v Speaker 4>moral failing, although maybe that is what I mean. I

0:28:38.634 --> 0:28:40.474
<v Speaker 4>don't think that's good. I don't think it's good for

0:28:40.514 --> 0:28:42.354
<v Speaker 4>you I don't think it's good for humanity. I don't

0:28:42.354 --> 0:28:42.834
<v Speaker 4>think it's good for.

0:28:42.794 --> 0:28:45.474
<v Speaker 1>The world, point taken. But I still want to know

0:28:45.554 --> 0:28:47.634
<v Speaker 1>why it isn't a good thing that men are now

0:28:47.674 --> 0:28:49.714
<v Speaker 1>having to do the same stuff that we've had to

0:28:49.754 --> 0:28:52.514
<v Speaker 1>do for millennia. Why isn't that good that now men

0:28:52.554 --> 0:28:53.754
<v Speaker 1>are also engaged?

0:28:53.834 --> 0:28:56.794
<v Speaker 2>I like saying, well, now everybody's miserable, so that's better?

0:28:57.034 --> 0:28:58.514
<v Speaker 3>And is it better?

0:28:58.514 --> 0:29:00.194
<v Speaker 2>Wouldn't it be better if we were working more in

0:29:00.194 --> 0:29:03.554
<v Speaker 2>the other direction to make everybody a little less veserable.

0:29:03.194 --> 0:29:05.114
<v Speaker 1>So a little less attractive and happy?

0:29:05.354 --> 0:29:08.554
<v Speaker 4>I was thinking about I'm very deep in Married at

0:29:08.554 --> 0:29:11.154
<v Speaker 4>First Sight this season, and we've talked about this before,

0:29:11.234 --> 0:29:14.914
<v Speaker 4>but the code word for everyone who's dating, the code

0:29:14.954 --> 0:29:17.474
<v Speaker 4>that they speak in is they say, I just want

0:29:17.514 --> 0:29:20.834
<v Speaker 4>someone who looks after themselves. Oh yeah, men and women

0:29:20.874 --> 0:29:22.394
<v Speaker 4>say it completely catally.

0:29:23.194 --> 0:29:24.874
<v Speaker 3>So what does that mean.

0:29:25.154 --> 0:29:27.794
<v Speaker 4>It means that they're slim, and it means that they're hot,

0:29:28.274 --> 0:29:30.954
<v Speaker 4>and it means that they hopefully have got their teeth done,

0:29:30.954 --> 0:29:35.274
<v Speaker 4>they've got some veneers, they exercise, they eat, blah blah blah.

0:29:35.234 --> 0:29:37.914
<v Speaker 2>I say, we think we can see healthy on people's faces,

0:29:37.914 --> 0:29:41.074
<v Speaker 2>but we really want to Yeah, Yeah, they look like

0:29:41.114 --> 0:29:42.794
<v Speaker 2>they've spent a lot of time fiddling with.

0:29:42.794 --> 0:29:45.074
<v Speaker 4>And so what does that mean for people who up down?

0:29:45.634 --> 0:29:48.994
<v Speaker 4>What does that mean for people who go that's not happen.

0:29:50.394 --> 0:29:53.594
<v Speaker 1>That's what it means.

0:29:53.994 --> 0:29:56.434
<v Speaker 2>If I have to call it sleive maxing, I'm happy

0:29:56.474 --> 0:29:58.034
<v Speaker 2>to leave it up the shelf and just watch.

0:30:02.114 --> 0:30:04.954
<v Speaker 1>There is something a little bit sinister about it too.

0:30:05.794 --> 0:30:08.794
<v Speaker 1>I need to mention that bit killer he's been hanging

0:30:08.794 --> 0:30:09.954
<v Speaker 1>out with some Nazis.

0:30:10.914 --> 0:30:13.434
<v Speaker 4>I feel like there's a line there, like there's a

0:30:13.434 --> 0:30:16.474
<v Speaker 4>bit is it a bit veering into eugenics?

0:30:16.514 --> 0:30:18.634
<v Speaker 3>Like is there something that's a bit are we optimizing?

0:30:18.874 --> 0:30:19.034
<v Speaker 1>Yes?

0:30:19.154 --> 0:30:19.554
<v Speaker 6>So much.

0:30:19.794 --> 0:30:22.394
<v Speaker 1>You're right, because you know, there was a Looks Maxer

0:30:22.514 --> 0:30:25.154
<v Speaker 1>Influenza who was a man who was black, and he

0:30:25.234 --> 0:30:29.794
<v Speaker 1>was basically hounded off platforms last year because people who

0:30:29.914 --> 0:30:35.354
<v Speaker 1>are into looks Maxing are only into white looks maxes.

0:30:35.514 --> 0:30:38.674
<v Speaker 4>Yeah. Right, So there's this particular aesthetic. Emmigreed is of

0:30:38.674 --> 0:30:40.794
<v Speaker 4>course a woman of color, but other than that, the

0:30:40.914 --> 0:30:44.834
<v Speaker 4>looks Maxing thing seems to be very skinny, rich white lady.

0:30:44.874 --> 0:30:46.794
<v Speaker 2>You know what's funny about it? And this is very

0:30:47.034 --> 0:30:48.954
<v Speaker 2>problematic to say, but I'm just going to say it

0:30:48.994 --> 0:30:52.074
<v Speaker 2>is that when the perfect man who's created his perfect

0:30:52.114 --> 0:30:52.874
<v Speaker 2>dimensions with.

0:30:52.874 --> 0:30:54.714
<v Speaker 5>His you know, his chin measures.

0:30:54.834 --> 0:30:58.034
<v Speaker 2>I want to him so bad, but you know, maybe

0:30:58.074 --> 0:31:00.674
<v Speaker 2>it's all created by surgery. Maybe it's all self improvement,

0:31:00.714 --> 0:31:04.114
<v Speaker 2>self care. And he and the perfect looks Maxing woman,

0:31:04.594 --> 0:31:06.314
<v Speaker 2>you know, they fall in love and they love each

0:31:06.314 --> 0:31:06.994
<v Speaker 2>other very much.

0:31:07.194 --> 0:31:11.274
<v Speaker 5>They make a baby. That baby's gonna look fucking ordinary because.

0:31:12.634 --> 0:31:14.794
<v Speaker 4>And then if you start with the looks maxing too,

0:31:15.034 --> 0:31:17.434
<v Speaker 4>that they have to look back to their children because

0:31:17.434 --> 0:31:19.634
<v Speaker 4>they can't be gone around with a that attractive child.

0:31:19.754 --> 0:31:22.674
<v Speaker 1>I think it's realing, But you've hit on something really

0:31:22.714 --> 0:31:26.034
<v Speaker 1>interesting about what the end goal of the looks Maxes is.

0:31:26.194 --> 0:31:30.074
<v Speaker 1>Because I'm talking primarily here about the male looks maxes.

0:31:30.114 --> 0:31:33.554
<v Speaker 1>I think women understand that if in fact you are attractive,

0:31:33.634 --> 0:31:35.834
<v Speaker 1>you get more out of life in terms of like

0:31:35.874 --> 0:31:38.034
<v Speaker 1>you're paid more, and you get more attention from the

0:31:38.154 --> 0:31:40.394
<v Speaker 1>opposite sex and so on. I think for men in

0:31:40.434 --> 0:31:42.634
<v Speaker 1>particular who are into looks Maxing, they talk a lot

0:31:42.634 --> 0:31:45.594
<v Speaker 1>about the attention of women and the fact that how

0:31:45.594 --> 0:31:47.114
<v Speaker 1>do you get the attention of women? How do you

0:31:47.194 --> 0:31:49.594
<v Speaker 1>slay max Again, I'm so sorry that I keep using

0:31:49.634 --> 0:31:53.354
<v Speaker 1>that word, but it's not about finding like a woman

0:31:53.354 --> 0:31:56.154
<v Speaker 1>who they can perhaps be happy with, build a life with,

0:31:56.514 --> 0:32:00.314
<v Speaker 1>like really connect with on a spiritual level. I think

0:32:00.514 --> 0:32:03.714
<v Speaker 1>that's what they're going for. I think it is more

0:32:03.794 --> 0:32:07.874
<v Speaker 1>about just getting the attention of as many women as possible,

0:32:07.954 --> 0:32:10.074
<v Speaker 1>almost to sort of then boast about it to other

0:32:10.114 --> 0:32:10.914
<v Speaker 1>looks Maxes.

0:32:11.434 --> 0:32:14.354
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it's not about a deep, enduring relationship.

0:32:14.394 --> 0:32:15.994
<v Speaker 3>I also worry, I think so.

0:32:15.794 --> 0:32:18.594
<v Speaker 4>That if a looks maxa looks at me, I worry

0:32:18.594 --> 0:32:22.034
<v Speaker 4>about what they'll say, because I'll say points that could

0:32:22.034 --> 0:32:22.714
<v Speaker 4>be optimized.

0:32:22.954 --> 0:32:24.674
<v Speaker 5>I remember when I was last single.

0:32:25.114 --> 0:32:27.074
<v Speaker 2>I remember a friend of mine fixed me up with

0:32:27.114 --> 0:32:29.914
<v Speaker 2>a guy who this was way before the term was coined,

0:32:29.914 --> 0:32:32.074
<v Speaker 2>but he was definitely a looks max like always in

0:32:32.114 --> 0:32:34.994
<v Speaker 2>the gym, very sweetly fragrance.

0:32:37.434 --> 0:32:39.314
<v Speaker 5>Wish I'd got the rule around the time.

0:32:39.594 --> 0:32:41.754
<v Speaker 2>And one of my friends fixed me up with him

0:32:41.794 --> 0:32:44.274
<v Speaker 2>on like a day and it was clearly never gonna whatever.

0:32:44.994 --> 0:32:48.274
<v Speaker 2>And her partner said to me one time after he

0:32:48.354 --> 0:32:50.194
<v Speaker 2>had a drink, he was like, well, it was never

0:32:50.274 --> 0:32:51.794
<v Speaker 2>gonna work, Like he.

0:32:51.674 --> 0:32:53.474
<v Speaker 5>Really cares about what he looks like.

0:32:55.034 --> 0:32:56.954
<v Speaker 2>And the thing is that was true, Like it was

0:32:57.034 --> 0:32:58.554
<v Speaker 2>kind of like out at the time, but it was

0:32:58.594 --> 0:33:01.114
<v Speaker 2>also true he cared about what he looked like a

0:33:01.154 --> 0:33:03.474
<v Speaker 2>great deal, and obviously I care about what I look like.

0:33:03.514 --> 0:33:06.074
<v Speaker 5>But there's a line I'm not prepared.

0:33:05.674 --> 0:33:08.594
<v Speaker 2>To spend that much time, that that's much energy, that

0:33:08.714 --> 0:33:09.834
<v Speaker 2>much risk, Like I'm just.

0:33:09.834 --> 0:33:13.074
<v Speaker 1>So that's another interesting dynamic with the looks Maxis and

0:33:13.114 --> 0:33:15.274
<v Speaker 1>the fact that they desperately want the attention of women,

0:33:15.354 --> 0:33:19.834
<v Speaker 1>because I do think that heterosexual women struggle, well, I'm

0:33:19.874 --> 0:33:23.314
<v Speaker 1>sure actually non heterosexual women also struggle with the concept

0:33:23.354 --> 0:33:26.914
<v Speaker 1>of male vanity. It's a bit of a taboo in fact,

0:33:27.034 --> 0:33:29.434
<v Speaker 1>men are not meant to care about what they look like,

0:33:29.674 --> 0:33:32.234
<v Speaker 1>particularly when it comes to women, And maybe that's what

0:33:32.274 --> 0:33:33.674
<v Speaker 1>they're sort of breaking down here.

0:33:34.474 --> 0:33:37.674
<v Speaker 2>After the break, I have got some scorellous celebrity gossip

0:33:37.754 --> 0:33:40.234
<v Speaker 2>that all teams with a particular.

0:33:39.714 --> 0:33:46.914
<v Speaker 6>Theme out loud as it's mea you've heard Jesse, Holly

0:33:46.954 --> 0:33:50.754
<v Speaker 6>and Amelia's Wathering Heights bad man theory. But there's more

0:33:50.794 --> 0:33:54.354
<v Speaker 6>to unpack, including gossip about the premiere and who was

0:33:54.394 --> 0:33:56.834
<v Speaker 6>who on the red carpet and why we've got a

0:33:56.834 --> 0:33:59.794
<v Speaker 6>little bit of beef within the pod. Anyway, for tomorrow's

0:33:59.794 --> 0:34:02.394
<v Speaker 6>subscriber episode, I'm going to tell you all about it.

0:34:02.594 --> 0:34:05.714
<v Speaker 6>I'm sitting down with Whole and Amelia to unpack everything

0:34:05.754 --> 0:34:08.513
<v Speaker 6>they thought about Margo and Jacob. So if you're not

0:34:08.554 --> 0:34:11.354
<v Speaker 6>already a subscriber, you're going to forget, So follow the

0:34:11.393 --> 0:34:12.953
<v Speaker 6>link in the show notes to get us in your

0:34:12.994 --> 0:34:14.513
<v Speaker 6>ears five days a week.

0:34:14.834 --> 0:34:17.553
<v Speaker 1>Right now, I'm bringing.

0:34:17.194 --> 0:34:20.554
<v Speaker 2>The show home today with a scorelous gossip roundup that

0:34:20.634 --> 0:34:23.154
<v Speaker 2>has a theme. We are teaming with a theme. How

0:34:23.194 --> 0:34:26.874
<v Speaker 2>the hell are we handling tricky relationship moments on social

0:34:26.914 --> 0:34:30.834
<v Speaker 2>media these days? In twenty twenty six, I start with

0:34:30.954 --> 0:34:35.834
<v Speaker 2>the excellent Australian content creator, comedian actress Celeste Barber right

0:34:36.314 --> 0:34:39.874
<v Speaker 2>on Friday, her hot husband and that's what he's always

0:34:39.874 --> 0:34:42.754
<v Speaker 2>been known as. I'm not OBJECTI find the man. Appy

0:34:42.834 --> 0:34:46.394
<v Speaker 2>Robin posted that after twenty years together and two kids,

0:34:46.714 --> 0:34:50.594
<v Speaker 2>they have agreed to separate. He wrote, the past few

0:34:50.594 --> 0:34:53.874
<v Speaker 2>months have been incredibly challenging and deeply heartbreaking for us both.

0:34:53.954 --> 0:34:56.754
<v Speaker 2>After much reflection, the decision has been made to separate.

0:34:57.034 --> 0:34:59.354
<v Speaker 2>There are still love and respect between us, but sadly

0:34:59.434 --> 0:35:01.913
<v Speaker 2>we are at capacity and have come to recognize we

0:35:01.994 --> 0:35:05.354
<v Speaker 2>may want for different things. Our priority remains our children

0:35:05.354 --> 0:35:08.873
<v Speaker 2>and they're well being. We kindly for privacy and understanding

0:35:08.914 --> 0:35:12.114
<v Speaker 2>as we navigate this. Obviously, the comments section gave a

0:35:12.114 --> 0:35:14.194
<v Speaker 2>lot of privacy and understanding.

0:35:14.714 --> 0:35:17.274
<v Speaker 1>Colley, can I just check did Celeste post as well?

0:35:17.594 --> 0:35:20.314
<v Speaker 2>So this is what's quite interesting about this. Appy has

0:35:20.354 --> 0:35:23.354
<v Speaker 2>two hundred and eighty eight thousand followers, a lot of followers,

0:35:23.354 --> 0:35:25.634
<v Speaker 2>and he has in his bio now formerly known as

0:35:25.674 --> 0:35:28.754
<v Speaker 2>hot Husband, and their relationship was quite part of her

0:35:29.314 --> 0:35:31.594
<v Speaker 2>stick if you like. I think Celeste Barber's hilarious and

0:35:31.594 --> 0:35:34.074
<v Speaker 2>I think probably Hot Husband started out because she was

0:35:34.114 --> 0:35:36.914
<v Speaker 2>positioning herself as not hot up against all the models

0:35:36.954 --> 0:35:40.194
<v Speaker 2>that she was impersonating and pointing out the beauty standards.

0:35:40.714 --> 0:35:43.594
<v Speaker 2>She has been completely silent. She's been posting, but she's

0:35:43.634 --> 0:35:46.554
<v Speaker 2>been posting to her very large following, just professional stuff

0:35:46.634 --> 0:35:50.674
<v Speaker 2>like she's been, you know, touring, doing shows, launching products,

0:35:51.034 --> 0:35:51.914
<v Speaker 2>but she hasn't official.

0:35:52.274 --> 0:35:54.154
<v Speaker 5>She has not mentioned this at all.

0:35:54.274 --> 0:35:58.874
<v Speaker 4>But his timing is interesting because we always say, knowing

0:35:58.954 --> 0:36:02.194
<v Speaker 4>how the internet and traffic works, if you want to

0:36:02.474 --> 0:36:04.634
<v Speaker 4>announce something that you want to fall under the radar,

0:36:04.754 --> 0:36:08.433
<v Speaker 4>you either do it around Christmas holidays or you do

0:36:08.474 --> 0:36:09.314
<v Speaker 4>it on a Friday night.

0:36:09.434 --> 0:36:11.114
<v Speaker 3>Because newsrooms have gone on.

0:36:11.394 --> 0:36:13.474
<v Speaker 2>I learned this from the West Wing that even in

0:36:13.514 --> 0:36:15.194
<v Speaker 2>the olden days is called taking out the trash. You

0:36:15.234 --> 0:36:17.394
<v Speaker 2>do it on a Friday night when no one's paying attention.

0:36:17.554 --> 0:36:18.354
<v Speaker 5>So he posted.

0:36:18.394 --> 0:36:21.274
<v Speaker 2>Then people did pay attention, and look, I think it's

0:36:21.314 --> 0:36:24.914
<v Speaker 2>icky when people claim to have feelings about parasocial relationship.

0:36:24.554 --> 0:36:27.754
<v Speaker 5>But I was quite sad shock. I always loved.

0:36:27.634 --> 0:36:31.634
<v Speaker 2>Their dynamic, and it made me realize everyone who's got

0:36:31.674 --> 0:36:33.834
<v Speaker 2>any kind of public profile has to make a decision

0:36:34.114 --> 0:36:35.834
<v Speaker 2>about how public or not they're going to be with

0:36:35.874 --> 0:36:39.834
<v Speaker 2>their relationship, their family, their real life right. And the

0:36:39.954 --> 0:36:42.074
<v Speaker 2>problem is is that whatever you decide to do with that,

0:36:42.114 --> 0:36:45.314
<v Speaker 2>particularly if you do decide to share, if and when

0:36:45.394 --> 0:36:48.154
<v Speaker 2>things go pay shape, that leaves you with a bigger problem.

0:36:48.194 --> 0:36:51.954
<v Speaker 1>I've often thought that's why Taylor Swift doesn't follow anyone,

0:36:53.074 --> 0:36:55.834
<v Speaker 1>because she has been around in the public eye for

0:36:55.914 --> 0:36:58.514
<v Speaker 1>long enough to know that things that you think are permanent,

0:36:58.594 --> 0:37:00.354
<v Speaker 1>things that you think are going to be there forever,

0:37:00.714 --> 0:37:02.514
<v Speaker 1>are not going to be there forever, and people are

0:37:02.554 --> 0:37:04.834
<v Speaker 1>going to be picking over your social media as a result.

0:37:05.274 --> 0:37:07.114
<v Speaker 2>Let's just say that if me and the elderly boyfriend

0:37:07.154 --> 0:37:09.274
<v Speaker 2>and ever split, I know where all the public sympaty

0:37:09.354 --> 0:37:13.594
<v Speaker 2>will go with him anyway. Moving on to happy news,

0:37:14.154 --> 0:37:19.154
<v Speaker 2>Aida Nicodemu, friend of the Pod, Big Book Club Girlie

0:37:19.554 --> 0:37:22.834
<v Speaker 2>been through a lot of shit. Aida Nicodemus of the Pod,

0:37:22.994 --> 0:37:27.433
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, oh loud ad Ada's are out louder. She's

0:37:27.434 --> 0:37:29.594
<v Speaker 2>obviously home on home and away and has been for

0:37:29.634 --> 0:37:33.513
<v Speaker 2>a long time. She on Valentine's Day talking of how

0:37:33.554 --> 0:37:36.794
<v Speaker 2>you handle it. She and James Stewart, her partner, announced

0:37:36.834 --> 0:37:39.434
<v Speaker 2>it exactly the same time, with exactly the same video

0:37:39.474 --> 0:37:43.154
<v Speaker 2>and exactly the same caption. I said yes, she said yes,

0:37:43.194 --> 0:37:46.274
<v Speaker 2>And it's a little, very low five, very real video

0:37:46.474 --> 0:37:48.553
<v Speaker 2>of him getting down on his knees and proposing to her

0:37:48.514 --> 0:37:51.154
<v Speaker 2>in a cougie park. I may have got quite excited

0:37:51.194 --> 0:37:56.393
<v Speaker 2>about that. These people are forty eight and fifty for decades,

0:37:56.474 --> 0:37:59.274
<v Speaker 2>they've been friends since that for twenty five years, they've

0:37:59.314 --> 0:38:02.354
<v Speaker 2>been dating for at least two they've both got teenagers.

0:38:02.794 --> 0:38:04.754
<v Speaker 2>As I say, they've both been through a lot of

0:38:04.794 --> 0:38:08.274
<v Speaker 2>stuff quite publicly, and I was like, yes, I hope

0:38:08.354 --> 0:38:10.834
<v Speaker 2>they're gone in for a big wedding pay day. I

0:38:10.874 --> 0:38:13.354
<v Speaker 2>don't know if that still exists in this era. No

0:38:13.714 --> 0:38:15.234
<v Speaker 2>celebrity magazine's been in the toilet.

0:38:15.274 --> 0:38:17.834
<v Speaker 4>But Holly, I keep waiting for my twin pregnancy pay day.

0:38:18.114 --> 0:38:20.994
<v Speaker 4>I'm like, I swear just hello magazine not exist, because

0:38:21.074 --> 0:38:23.154
<v Speaker 4>that I feel like they would like lap this up.

0:38:23.554 --> 0:38:25.234
<v Speaker 3>And I've been waiting for a call where they just

0:38:25.354 --> 0:38:27.394
<v Speaker 3>offer me a lump sum of money.

0:38:27.474 --> 0:38:28.393
<v Speaker 1>Is it how I used to work?

0:38:28.474 --> 0:38:30.354
<v Speaker 2>That's exactly how it used to work. We would call

0:38:30.434 --> 0:38:32.674
<v Speaker 2>your agent. We'd say, what do you think Jesse would

0:38:32.674 --> 0:38:34.554
<v Speaker 2>be thinking about? But don't wish for that because you

0:38:34.594 --> 0:38:36.513
<v Speaker 2>know what the next sentence would be. We'd be like,

0:38:36.794 --> 0:38:38.714
<v Speaker 2>what do you think Jesse would be thinking about for

0:38:38.754 --> 0:38:40.794
<v Speaker 2>her twin announcement? In the agent would go, oh, you know,

0:38:40.874 --> 0:38:42.554
<v Speaker 2>blah blah through out a figure, and then you go,

0:38:42.914 --> 0:38:45.194
<v Speaker 2>what about a body after baby? We were thinking like

0:38:45.474 --> 0:38:47.234
<v Speaker 2>eight weeks after birth, and the.

0:38:47.274 --> 0:38:48.714
<v Speaker 5>Agent would wrap the price.

0:38:48.514 --> 0:38:53.873
<v Speaker 7>Up's expensive, Holly, I everyone has their price, and then

0:38:53.914 --> 0:38:57.913
<v Speaker 7>you'd go bikini question mark and then go that'll cost

0:38:57.954 --> 0:38:58.553
<v Speaker 7>you another ten.

0:38:58.634 --> 0:39:03.274
<v Speaker 2>That's what used to it, Jesse. Other celebrities being public

0:39:03.274 --> 0:39:05.674
<v Speaker 2>with their private business. Tell me give me a Beckham update.

0:39:05.954 --> 0:39:06.154
<v Speaker 1>Yeap.

0:39:06.314 --> 0:39:08.114
<v Speaker 4>So the first thing I thought when I saw this

0:39:08.274 --> 0:39:12.074
<v Speaker 4>story was, oh my god, the emotional weight of being

0:39:12.674 --> 0:39:16.954
<v Speaker 4>a daughter, right, and this is Harper Beckham, the youngest Beckham,

0:39:17.354 --> 0:39:20.393
<v Speaker 4>but notably the eldest daughter because she's the only daughter.

0:39:20.794 --> 0:39:23.834
<v Speaker 4>She is fourteen years old. And she posted to Instagram

0:39:23.834 --> 0:39:27.074
<v Speaker 4>over the weekend in what appears to be her first

0:39:27.114 --> 0:39:32.314
<v Speaker 4>sort of acknowledgment of the rift estrangement Beckham situation, which

0:39:32.434 --> 0:39:34.874
<v Speaker 4>was she posted a picture of her three brothers, Brooklyn,

0:39:34.954 --> 0:39:37.954
<v Speaker 4>Cruz and Romeo just had the words I love you

0:39:38.074 --> 0:39:41.393
<v Speaker 4>all so much. Words can't describe it, and Romeo and

0:39:41.474 --> 0:39:43.314
<v Speaker 4>Victoria Beckham reposted it.

0:39:43.434 --> 0:39:46.634
<v Speaker 1>She got reshared published. She has a private account by

0:39:47.154 --> 0:39:51.033
<v Speaker 1>Victoria and by Romeo, and that in itself is kind

0:39:51.074 --> 0:39:53.994
<v Speaker 1>of makes me feel uncomfortable because she chose I mean,

0:39:54.034 --> 0:39:55.994
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure they sought her permission for it, but she

0:39:56.154 --> 0:40:00.194
<v Speaker 1>did post it to a much more limited group of people, and.

0:40:00.194 --> 0:40:02.873
<v Speaker 4>It becomes and then when you do that, it becomes performance,

0:40:02.914 --> 0:40:07.873
<v Speaker 4>which just feels like such a less intimate Do you

0:40:07.914 --> 0:40:09.514
<v Speaker 4>just look at some of this stuff and you're like, oh,

0:40:09.554 --> 0:40:11.234
<v Speaker 4>we having conversations behind the scenes.

0:40:11.674 --> 0:40:13.674
<v Speaker 1>It feels like Victoria's trying to prove a point by

0:40:13.674 --> 0:40:17.074
<v Speaker 1>sharing it publicly, which Harper wasn't making by not sharing it.

0:40:17.594 --> 0:40:21.354
<v Speaker 4>Now, this is in stark contrast to Cruz, who a

0:40:21.354 --> 0:40:24.714
<v Speaker 4>few months ago reposted a Daily Mail article that alleged

0:40:24.754 --> 0:40:29.074
<v Speaker 4>that Victoria and David had unfollowed Brooklyn, and he basically went, no,

0:40:29.834 --> 0:40:33.074
<v Speaker 4>they didn't, Brooklyn unfollowed them, and blah blah blah, like

0:40:33.114 --> 0:40:35.674
<v Speaker 4>he's been waiting into it a little bit. And I

0:40:35.674 --> 0:40:38.714
<v Speaker 4>remember thinking when I saw that a daughter could never

0:40:39.034 --> 0:40:42.914
<v Speaker 4>because the role of a daughter in the family dynamic

0:40:43.034 --> 0:40:48.274
<v Speaker 4>is often to consider and weigh up everyone's emotional needs

0:40:48.434 --> 0:40:51.234
<v Speaker 4>and try and keep the equilibrium of the family. And

0:40:51.274 --> 0:40:53.634
<v Speaker 4>that's why I felt when I saw Harper do that

0:40:53.674 --> 0:40:59.034
<v Speaker 4>at fourteen, I just went that show's probably emotional intelligence,

0:40:59.114 --> 0:41:01.314
<v Speaker 4>but also like her own grief about the whole.

0:41:01.154 --> 0:41:03.514
<v Speaker 2>Thing that's been of emotional intelligence. And this isn't directed

0:41:03.554 --> 0:41:06.114
<v Speaker 2>at Hart because she's literally fourteen, but Amelia.

0:41:06.274 --> 0:41:06.954
<v Speaker 1>Isn't it weird?

0:41:07.194 --> 0:41:10.393
<v Speaker 2>The Beckham because actually Cruz Beckham also posted last week

0:41:10.394 --> 0:41:12.794
<v Speaker 2>and he posted some random pictures from his life. He's

0:41:12.834 --> 0:41:14.513
<v Speaker 2>got a record to promote, he's in a band now,

0:41:14.914 --> 0:41:18.234
<v Speaker 2>and there were pictures of Brooklyn in that like throwback old.

0:41:18.034 --> 0:41:20.433
<v Speaker 5>Pictures of that isn't the lesson was supposed to get

0:41:20.434 --> 0:41:20.674
<v Speaker 5>from this.

0:41:20.714 --> 0:41:22.314
<v Speaker 2>All this a merely that if they all love each

0:41:22.314 --> 0:41:24.634
<v Speaker 2>other so much, maybe keeping off the social.

0:41:24.354 --> 0:41:28.634
<v Speaker 1>For me feel like those children have grown up learning

0:41:29.234 --> 0:41:33.034
<v Speaker 1>that the most important way to express love, or certainly

0:41:33.074 --> 0:41:36.674
<v Speaker 1>an important way to express love is on Instagram. Because

0:41:36.954 --> 0:41:39.873
<v Speaker 1>David and Victoria are constantly telling us how much they

0:41:39.914 --> 0:41:43.674
<v Speaker 1>love their children on Instagram, and I don't understand why

0:41:43.714 --> 0:41:46.554
<v Speaker 1>I need to know, Like that's great for them, but

0:41:46.674 --> 0:41:49.594
<v Speaker 1>why why do they tell us this? And isn't that

0:41:49.714 --> 0:41:52.794
<v Speaker 1>kind of Unbritish to be constantly emotioning in that way?

0:41:52.914 --> 0:41:54.754
<v Speaker 2>I don't think it is anymore, because I think social

0:41:54.794 --> 0:41:57.514
<v Speaker 2>media's changed it, because I'm always kind of surprised, Like

0:41:57.674 --> 0:42:00.714
<v Speaker 2>not surprised for Victorian and David, it's their brand, but

0:42:00.834 --> 0:42:03.914
<v Speaker 2>the kids being so open all the time on social

0:42:04.434 --> 0:42:05.674
<v Speaker 2>seems a little bit strange.

0:42:05.674 --> 0:42:08.114
<v Speaker 5>But then I was my niece who's not.

0:42:08.434 --> 0:42:11.674
<v Speaker 2>Obviously famous or whatever, but she just turned twenty one

0:42:11.834 --> 0:42:13.634
<v Speaker 2>and on the day that she did, her feet is

0:42:13.674 --> 0:42:17.474
<v Speaker 2>just full of all her friends posting pictures of them together,

0:42:17.874 --> 0:42:20.434
<v Speaker 2>how much they love her, go queen. All that stuff

0:42:20.474 --> 0:42:23.754
<v Speaker 2>that is just very very normal now for a generation.

0:42:24.474 --> 0:42:28.754
<v Speaker 2>Is that at any major moment that you do post

0:42:28.794 --> 0:42:31.074
<v Speaker 2>about it, and you're expected to post about it for

0:42:31.074 --> 0:42:33.114
<v Speaker 2>about the people you love, and you're expected to tag

0:42:33.114 --> 0:42:34.674
<v Speaker 2>them and they're expected to reshare it.

0:42:34.714 --> 0:42:35.873
<v Speaker 5>And I just wonder.

0:42:35.594 --> 0:42:40.074
<v Speaker 2>If actually celebrities are just reflecting what the young people

0:42:40.114 --> 0:42:42.514
<v Speaker 2>makes me sound a hundred but what is very ordinary?

0:42:42.554 --> 0:42:44.354
<v Speaker 2>I always remember and Vernham said to us that if

0:42:44.354 --> 0:42:46.594
<v Speaker 2>people didn't post about her on her birthday, should be

0:42:46.634 --> 0:42:47.834
<v Speaker 2>a bit upset, for example.

0:42:47.874 --> 0:42:52.234
<v Speaker 4>The problem with that, though, is the more you post,

0:42:52.434 --> 0:42:55.714
<v Speaker 4>like Claire and I are constantly linking to each other

0:42:55.834 --> 0:42:58.674
<v Speaker 4>going or there's been a breakup, like a this is

0:42:58.714 --> 0:43:01.154
<v Speaker 4>like people in our lives or like you know, minor

0:43:01.274 --> 0:43:06.034
<v Speaker 4>celebrities or whatever where you can tell because the declarations

0:43:06.034 --> 0:43:09.274
<v Speaker 4>of love have stopped, or because the cadence of posting

0:43:09.314 --> 0:43:13.034
<v Speaker 4>has changed or whatever. Like when you let people in

0:43:13.074 --> 0:43:15.234
<v Speaker 4>for a little glimpse, you then give them a license

0:43:15.274 --> 0:43:17.754
<v Speaker 4>to kind of speculate on the ins and outs of

0:43:17.794 --> 0:43:18.314
<v Speaker 4>your life.

0:43:18.434 --> 0:43:21.473
<v Speaker 1>That's exactly it, and that's where we started this conversation.

0:43:21.714 --> 0:43:24.234
<v Speaker 1>And I think that if you're telling people about the

0:43:24.234 --> 0:43:27.154
<v Speaker 1>good times, they are going to expect that you can

0:43:27.274 --> 0:43:30.034
<v Speaker 1>communicate with them through the bad times too. And I

0:43:30.074 --> 0:43:34.714
<v Speaker 1>think that we really see that tension around celebrity divorce announcements,

0:43:35.154 --> 0:43:37.953
<v Speaker 1>and I was thinking about, how do you remember when

0:43:37.994 --> 0:43:41.114
<v Speaker 1>Sasha Baron Cohen and isle of Fisher announced their divorce

0:43:41.874 --> 0:43:46.354
<v Speaker 1>or their separation. It was them wearing tennis clothes about

0:43:46.354 --> 0:43:49.274
<v Speaker 1>a match, and it was the match being over, and

0:43:49.314 --> 0:43:52.393
<v Speaker 1>it was this extended tennis metaphor, and look, I know

0:43:52.594 --> 0:43:55.473
<v Speaker 1>you love tennis, but that was too much. It just

0:43:55.514 --> 0:43:57.554
<v Speaker 1>felt too contrived.

0:43:56.994 --> 0:44:00.473
<v Speaker 4>All like inauthentic. And then on the other hand, there

0:44:00.514 --> 0:44:03.474
<v Speaker 4>was a story recently. It was a local, kind of

0:44:03.514 --> 0:44:07.634
<v Speaker 4>Australian celebrity story. Couple had broken up, lots of followers

0:44:07.674 --> 0:44:10.834
<v Speaker 4>between them, questions about what had happened that a lot

0:44:10.874 --> 0:44:14.914
<v Speaker 4>of people had But then it got into child support

0:44:15.154 --> 0:44:17.834
<v Speaker 4>and what time this person showed up for a visit,

0:44:18.194 --> 0:44:21.234
<v Speaker 4>and it became this back and forth between two people

0:44:21.274 --> 0:44:25.674
<v Speaker 4>that are clearly really hurt and have a complicated personal relationship.

0:44:25.674 --> 0:44:27.594
<v Speaker 4>I was thinking it would take such restraint not to

0:44:27.674 --> 0:44:31.274
<v Speaker 4>say anything, especially if your partner has an enormous public

0:44:31.314 --> 0:44:34.234
<v Speaker 4>platform that they're maybe profiting off or whatever, and you

0:44:34.274 --> 0:44:35.994
<v Speaker 4>know you could do real damage.

0:44:35.674 --> 0:44:38.954
<v Speaker 2>Or presenting a version of themselves that you deeply feel

0:44:38.994 --> 0:44:42.794
<v Speaker 2>is untrue. Like that, Again, this is not just celebrity business,

0:44:42.834 --> 0:44:45.314
<v Speaker 2>but if you're sort of seeing an ex partner or

0:44:45.354 --> 0:44:48.354
<v Speaker 2>whatever professing to be the world's most wonderful dad, or

0:44:48.754 --> 0:44:51.354
<v Speaker 2>social media when you're kind of like, well, you haven't

0:44:51.354 --> 0:44:54.873
<v Speaker 2>seen the kids, for like, the temptation is huge. We

0:44:54.994 --> 0:44:57.474
<v Speaker 2>literally have this microphone where we can put people on blast,

0:44:57.474 --> 0:45:00.034
<v Speaker 2>we can put our feelings on blast, and it takes

0:45:00.074 --> 0:45:03.154
<v Speaker 2>a lot of restraint and maturity. I guess to not

0:45:04.034 --> 0:45:06.674
<v Speaker 2>did you catch Nicole Kidman's Valentine's Day post? Just on

0:45:06.754 --> 0:45:08.474
<v Speaker 2>this What did she posted?

0:45:08.634 --> 0:45:11.034
<v Speaker 3>Because normally she would post about Keith, Well.

0:45:10.874 --> 0:45:13.834
<v Speaker 2>They are because this is what's to your point, Amelia,

0:45:13.914 --> 0:45:17.553
<v Speaker 2>about can you redraw the boundaries once you've kind of gone, oh, actually,

0:45:17.594 --> 0:45:20.034
<v Speaker 2>I don't want to tell everybody about this messiness. She

0:45:20.194 --> 0:45:23.433
<v Speaker 2>and Keith were always very public with their declarations of love,

0:45:23.474 --> 0:45:26.674
<v Speaker 2>weren't they. And on Saturday she just posted a rather

0:45:26.714 --> 0:45:29.194
<v Speaker 2>sexy picture of herself in a man's shirt, which is

0:45:29.194 --> 0:45:33.234
<v Speaker 2>a look Nick rocks, and it just said Happy Gallantines

0:45:33.394 --> 0:45:34.034
<v Speaker 2>with a love.

0:45:33.954 --> 0:45:36.714
<v Speaker 1>Heart and I was also perfectly shot and lit. We

0:45:36.754 --> 0:45:37.794
<v Speaker 1>need to pay.

0:45:38.034 --> 0:45:39.513
<v Speaker 3>Very lovely day.

0:45:39.874 --> 0:45:41.914
<v Speaker 5>She was like, I cannot let this go on. Marked

0:45:44.034 --> 0:45:45.114
<v Speaker 5>that's all we've got time for.

0:45:45.194 --> 0:45:47.674
<v Speaker 2>On Today's show, out loud is Thank you for being

0:45:47.714 --> 0:45:49.993
<v Speaker 2>here with us, and thank you to our amazing team

0:45:50.034 --> 0:45:51.514
<v Speaker 2>for helping us put this show together.

0:45:51.994 --> 0:45:54.354
<v Speaker 3>Bye bye.

0:45:58.434 --> 0:46:01.433
<v Speaker 4>Ma Mayer acknowledges the traditional owners of the land on

0:46:01.474 --> 0:46:03.314
<v Speaker 4>which we have recorded this podcast.