WEBVTT - The Mother Who Won’t Put A Trigger Warning On Her Child’s Life

0:00:10.405 --> 0:00:14.165
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to a Mom and Me a podcast. Mama

0:00:14.245 --> 0:00:16.965
<v Speaker 1>Maya acknowledges the traditional owners of land and waters that

0:00:17.005 --> 0:00:18.525
<v Speaker 1>this podcast is recorded on.

0:00:18.765 --> 0:00:22.045
<v Speaker 2>So let me get this straight. You, as a very

0:00:22.125 --> 0:00:26.085
<v Speaker 2>privileged person who have got two healthy children as far

0:00:26.125 --> 0:00:31.045
<v Speaker 2>as you know, want me, someone who is experiencing trauma

0:00:31.085 --> 0:00:34.285
<v Speaker 2>and pain to put a trigger warning on my child's

0:00:34.325 --> 0:00:37.365
<v Speaker 2>life to make you feel more comfortable.

0:00:37.205 --> 0:00:40.365
<v Speaker 1>From I'm Meya Friedman. And you're listening to No Filter

0:00:42.125 --> 0:00:45.925
<v Speaker 1>at a recent performance of Macbeth by a Melbourne theater company. Recently,

0:00:46.525 --> 0:00:49.605
<v Speaker 1>the program included a content warning. It's something that's become

0:00:49.725 --> 0:00:52.365
<v Speaker 1>quite common, not just in the theater, but in podcasts,

0:00:52.565 --> 0:00:56.805
<v Speaker 1>on websites and blogs on social media, and even in books.

0:00:57.165 --> 0:00:59.965
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure you've seen them. They're sometimes called trigger warnings,

0:01:00.405 --> 0:01:02.925
<v Speaker 1>and the idea behind them is that before you consume

0:01:02.965 --> 0:01:05.805
<v Speaker 1>a piece of content, you know what you're getting in

0:01:05.805 --> 0:01:08.565
<v Speaker 1>case the subject matter is upsetting to you, so that

0:01:08.645 --> 0:01:13.125
<v Speaker 1>way you can prepare yourself somehow or avoid it altogether.

0:01:13.765 --> 0:01:16.405
<v Speaker 1>I'll read you the content warning for this Macbeth performance.

0:01:17.085 --> 0:01:19.325
<v Speaker 1>It's quite long, so i'll only read part of it.

0:01:19.325 --> 0:01:23.565
<v Speaker 1>It said this production contains coarse language explicit depiction of

0:01:23.645 --> 0:01:29.245
<v Speaker 1>violence and blood, sexual references, discussion of warfare, discussion of infanticide, misogyny,

0:01:29.365 --> 0:01:33.605
<v Speaker 1>occasional drinking and smoking, references to death or dying, references

0:01:33.605 --> 0:01:37.245
<v Speaker 1>to mental illness, and depictions of ableism, occasional use of

0:01:37.285 --> 0:01:42.245
<v Speaker 1>prop weapons, loud and dynamic sound and smoke effects. That's

0:01:42.285 --> 0:01:44.925
<v Speaker 1>just the start, though. It actually goes on for about

0:01:44.925 --> 0:01:47.845
<v Speaker 1>another five hundred words or so, and under each of

0:01:47.885 --> 0:01:51.965
<v Speaker 1>those topics it lists a lot of detail about how

0:01:52.005 --> 0:01:55.445
<v Speaker 1>they're used in the performance. For example, it lists the

0:01:55.525 --> 0:01:59.525
<v Speaker 1>number of times certain swear words are used. It notes

0:01:59.645 --> 0:02:03.245
<v Speaker 1>that there are themes of misogyny and ableism, and under

0:02:03.285 --> 0:02:07.125
<v Speaker 1>each of those examples it gets very specific. For example,

0:02:07.245 --> 0:02:11.085
<v Speaker 1>under the subheading of infanticide, it says, in the closing

0:02:11.125 --> 0:02:14.205
<v Speaker 1>scenes of the work, Macduff accuses Lady Macbeth of ordering

0:02:14.205 --> 0:02:17.525
<v Speaker 1>the murder of Lady Macduff's infant. This case of infanticide

0:02:17.565 --> 0:02:21.445
<v Speaker 1>is only spoken about, not enacted on stage. Good to know.

0:02:22.445 --> 0:02:24.805
<v Speaker 1>It's not just this theater company, though, and I'm not

0:02:24.925 --> 0:02:28.165
<v Speaker 1>naming them because I don't want anyone to be attacking

0:02:28.205 --> 0:02:32.245
<v Speaker 1>them or piling onto them. You might have noticed something

0:02:32.285 --> 0:02:36.645
<v Speaker 1>called trigger creep. It's a proliferation of warnings and an

0:02:36.685 --> 0:02:40.285
<v Speaker 1>expansion of those warnings about all sorts of things that

0:02:40.325 --> 0:02:43.645
<v Speaker 1>are popping up in all sorts of places. In the

0:02:43.685 --> 0:02:46.605
<v Speaker 1>past few months, I've been keeping some notes, and I've

0:02:46.645 --> 0:02:54.045
<v Speaker 1>seen trigger warnings for some of the following things. Anxiety, depression, suicide, blood, hospitals,

0:02:54.245 --> 0:02:59.885
<v Speaker 1>self harm, sexual abuse, cancer, domestic violence, exercise, grief, racism,

0:02:59.965 --> 0:03:07.405
<v Speaker 1>mental health, war, eating disorders, transphobia, homophobia, alcohol, poverty, ableism, childlessness,

0:03:07.565 --> 0:03:15.165
<v Speaker 1>emotional abuse, divorce, diet culture, miscarriage, self harm, infertility, car accidents, meat,

0:03:15.445 --> 0:03:20.885
<v Speaker 1>sexist language, menstruation, and menopause. And that's an exhausting list,

0:03:21.005 --> 0:03:24.085
<v Speaker 1>but it's by no means exhaustive. There were many other

0:03:24.125 --> 0:03:27.765
<v Speaker 1>things as well. And look, it would be really easy

0:03:27.805 --> 0:03:29.645
<v Speaker 1>to have a rant at this point and talk about

0:03:29.685 --> 0:03:33.485
<v Speaker 1>the world going mad and people being snowflakes. But that's

0:03:33.565 --> 0:03:36.525
<v Speaker 1>not what No Filter is about. It's not a runty show,

0:03:36.845 --> 0:03:40.325
<v Speaker 1>and I'm not a rounty person. No Filter is fundamentally

0:03:40.405 --> 0:03:43.445
<v Speaker 1>a show about people and their stories, and many of

0:03:43.485 --> 0:03:47.605
<v Speaker 1>those stories cover those kinds of topics because No Filter

0:03:47.685 --> 0:03:49.965
<v Speaker 1>is about what it means to be human. And I

0:03:50.005 --> 0:03:53.165
<v Speaker 1>think that everybody involved in this debate really does come

0:03:53.205 --> 0:03:56.205
<v Speaker 1>from a good place, I do. Those in favor of

0:03:56.205 --> 0:04:00.885
<v Speaker 1>content warnings insist that it's basic decency to warn people

0:04:00.925 --> 0:04:04.165
<v Speaker 1>before they hear or read something that might upset them,

0:04:04.525 --> 0:04:09.125
<v Speaker 1>which sounds very reasonable. Those against trigger warnings insist that

0:04:09.165 --> 0:04:11.885
<v Speaker 1>it is a ridiculous form of pandering and that it's

0:04:11.965 --> 0:04:16.365
<v Speaker 1>actually counter productive, which is another interesting perspective and probably

0:04:16.405 --> 0:04:19.885
<v Speaker 1>the one that I share. But what does the science say?

0:04:20.005 --> 0:04:22.685
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't matter what I think. What are medical professionals

0:04:22.765 --> 0:04:26.925
<v Speaker 1>who work with traumatized people advise? What a traumatized people

0:04:26.965 --> 0:04:32.885
<v Speaker 1>themselves actually say? Are trigger warnings actually helpful? Well, spoiler no,

0:04:33.165 --> 0:04:34.885
<v Speaker 1>as it turns out, But we will get to that.

0:04:35.445 --> 0:04:38.005
<v Speaker 1>What I want to explore today is what's going on?

0:04:38.525 --> 0:04:41.005
<v Speaker 1>Why do we suddenly feel that we need to warn

0:04:41.045 --> 0:04:44.965
<v Speaker 1>people about everything? And then you can decide for yourself

0:04:45.005 --> 0:04:47.125
<v Speaker 1>whether they're a good idea or not. This is a

0:04:47.165 --> 0:04:50.125
<v Speaker 1>special episode of No Filter because today I'm bringing you

0:04:50.165 --> 0:04:52.405
<v Speaker 1>two guests. In a little bit you're going to meet

0:04:52.445 --> 0:04:56.885
<v Speaker 1>Victoria Bridgeland. She's a researcher here in Australia who has

0:04:56.925 --> 0:05:00.965
<v Speaker 1>actually done the definitive global study on trigger warnings and

0:05:01.045 --> 0:05:05.245
<v Speaker 1>what she found may surprise you, but First, you're going

0:05:05.245 --> 0:05:08.845
<v Speaker 1>to meet Rachel Cassella. You may remember Rachel if you

0:05:08.885 --> 0:05:12.805
<v Speaker 1>are a p particular longtime listener of No Filter. She's

0:05:12.845 --> 0:05:15.325
<v Speaker 1>been on a previous episode of No Filter, and she's

0:05:15.365 --> 0:05:19.405
<v Speaker 1>written quite a lot on Muma Maya and she's also

0:05:19.645 --> 0:05:23.085
<v Speaker 1>a big advocate on social media. She's amazing. She's a

0:05:23.125 --> 0:05:27.365
<v Speaker 1>detective sergeant in the AFP, and she's a fearless advocate

0:05:27.685 --> 0:05:31.205
<v Speaker 1>for the memory of her little girl, Mackenzie. And I

0:05:31.205 --> 0:05:33.605
<v Speaker 1>don't want to say more now because nobody can talk

0:05:33.685 --> 0:05:38.885
<v Speaker 1>about McKenzie like Rachel does. And importantly, there is no

0:05:38.925 --> 0:05:42.205
<v Speaker 1>trigger warning or content warning on what you're about to hear,

0:05:42.525 --> 0:05:48.445
<v Speaker 1>and that's very deliberate. Here's Rachel Cassella. Rach, I want

0:05:48.485 --> 0:05:50.845
<v Speaker 1>to start by asking you about McKenzie. Tell me about her.

0:05:51.805 --> 0:05:54.885
<v Speaker 2>The love of my life, which now I feel guilty

0:05:54.885 --> 0:05:58.205
<v Speaker 2>about seeing because you know, I've got other children, but

0:05:58.325 --> 0:06:03.765
<v Speaker 2>she just changed everything for me. McKenzie's my first born.

0:06:04.245 --> 0:06:06.885
<v Speaker 2>I did have pregnancies before her, but she was my

0:06:07.005 --> 0:06:11.725
<v Speaker 2>first born, little girl. She was born eleventh of March

0:06:11.805 --> 0:06:16.205
<v Speaker 2>twenty seventeen and she was just magic, pure perfection.

0:06:16.565 --> 0:06:18.205
<v Speaker 1>Did you always know you wanted to be a mum?

0:06:18.685 --> 0:06:21.765
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's interesting. I was listening to your episode about

0:06:22.005 --> 0:06:25.005
<v Speaker 2>people not knowing, and I've always thought that would be

0:06:25.045 --> 0:06:28.085
<v Speaker 2>sort of the hardest part is in the space of

0:06:28.125 --> 0:06:31.485
<v Speaker 2>not knowing, because I've always known deepen my soul and

0:06:31.845 --> 0:06:35.725
<v Speaker 2>that puzzle piece when she arrived just clicked into place.

0:06:36.645 --> 0:06:38.045
<v Speaker 1>Was it hard to get pregnant with her.

0:06:38.965 --> 0:06:41.485
<v Speaker 2>No, it took a couple of months, but when I

0:06:41.605 --> 0:06:44.565
<v Speaker 2>actually knew what my ovulation window is, because I think

0:06:44.605 --> 0:06:47.645
<v Speaker 2>we spent so much time in schools turning to lessons

0:06:47.685 --> 0:06:50.045
<v Speaker 2>about how not to get pregnant that a lot of people,

0:06:50.085 --> 0:06:54.725
<v Speaker 2>including me, didn't actually know my fertile window or my

0:06:54.925 --> 0:06:57.965
<v Speaker 2>ovulation day. So once we got that, we did have

0:06:58.005 --> 0:07:01.125
<v Speaker 2>a miscarriage before McKenzie at six and a half weeks,

0:07:01.165 --> 0:07:05.525
<v Speaker 2>which was devastating at the time, but unfortunately that's now

0:07:05.605 --> 0:07:09.085
<v Speaker 2>been buried for one of a better term under a

0:07:09.685 --> 0:07:12.045
<v Speaker 2>lot of other trauma that's piled on top of it,

0:07:12.125 --> 0:07:15.485
<v Speaker 2>because when Mackenzie was ten weeks old, she was diagnosed

0:07:16.125 --> 0:07:20.405
<v Speaker 2>with a terminal condition, a genetic terminal conditioner called spinal

0:07:20.525 --> 0:07:23.725
<v Speaker 2>muscular atrophy. We lost her when she was seven months

0:07:23.725 --> 0:07:24.725
<v Speaker 2>and eleven days old.

0:07:25.285 --> 0:07:28.325
<v Speaker 1>Those first ten weeks before you knew what were.

0:07:28.165 --> 0:07:32.805
<v Speaker 2>They like like I had one lolotto. I literally remember

0:07:33.445 --> 0:07:37.485
<v Speaker 2>strutting down the street like I had this. I don't know,

0:07:37.525 --> 0:07:40.365
<v Speaker 2>A new world had been open to me. I felt

0:07:40.365 --> 0:07:44.645
<v Speaker 2>like I was getting beautiful attention, My baby was getting

0:07:44.645 --> 0:07:50.565
<v Speaker 2>beautiful attention. I felt special. This just love. Yeah, it

0:07:50.605 --> 0:07:51.885
<v Speaker 2>was just pure magic.

0:07:52.485 --> 0:07:55.325
<v Speaker 1>How was she diagnosed? Because there were no genetic tests

0:07:55.365 --> 0:07:57.885
<v Speaker 1>back then, you and your husband were both carriers of

0:07:57.845 --> 0:08:00.565
<v Speaker 1>a genetic condition that you had not been told about

0:08:00.645 --> 0:08:03.125
<v Speaker 1>or tested for. How did you find out?

0:08:03.525 --> 0:08:08.445
<v Speaker 2>Very quickly, very abruptly. She had a lactation consultant appointment.

0:08:08.845 --> 0:08:11.205
<v Speaker 2>They said that she wasn't moving the way that she should.

0:08:11.805 --> 0:08:15.405
<v Speaker 2>I quickly rushed her to a local GP who very

0:08:15.805 --> 0:08:18.325
<v Speaker 2>scarily sort of said, you need to go to see

0:08:18.325 --> 0:08:22.765
<v Speaker 2>a pediatrician. Immediately got into a pediatrician appointment two days later,

0:08:22.845 --> 0:08:25.605
<v Speaker 2>and within five minutes of being a that appointment, he

0:08:25.685 --> 0:08:28.685
<v Speaker 2>diagnosed her and said it was terminal. So it went

0:08:28.765 --> 0:08:32.365
<v Speaker 2>from thinking that I was on cloud nine to just

0:08:32.725 --> 0:08:35.085
<v Speaker 2>wondering how I was supposed to actually survive to the

0:08:35.125 --> 0:08:38.925
<v Speaker 2>next day. How did he deliver that news really abruptly?

0:08:39.405 --> 0:08:41.045
<v Speaker 2>I would say that there's no good way to say

0:08:41.085 --> 0:08:42.645
<v Speaker 2>that news. But I think there's a better way to

0:08:42.685 --> 0:08:46.605
<v Speaker 2>say that news. Our later interactions with who would become

0:08:46.685 --> 0:08:51.525
<v Speaker 2>McKenzie's neurologists were much more pleasant, despite the situation. But

0:08:51.725 --> 0:08:54.925
<v Speaker 2>he just said, I'm pretty sure it's spinne, a muscular atrophy,

0:08:54.965 --> 0:08:57.045
<v Speaker 2>and we went, well, what is that? And he said

0:08:57.045 --> 0:09:00.765
<v Speaker 2>it's terminal. I froze and shut down initially, and then

0:09:00.805 --> 0:09:02.885
<v Speaker 2>after a couple of minutes, I started like sort of

0:09:03.525 --> 0:09:06.285
<v Speaker 2>getting really upset and he told me to calm down, missy,

0:09:06.645 --> 0:09:10.525
<v Speaker 2>and that's just burnt in my head, all right. We

0:09:10.525 --> 0:09:13.245
<v Speaker 2>were made to pay a big bill as we were

0:09:13.325 --> 0:09:16.285
<v Speaker 2>leaving his office, and we left back home. It wasn't

0:09:16.325 --> 0:09:18.885
<v Speaker 2>until later that we sort of knew we should have

0:09:19.005 --> 0:09:21.565
<v Speaker 2>been taken straight down to Sydney Children's Hospital to meet

0:09:21.605 --> 0:09:24.085
<v Speaker 2>with the neurologists, to not have been left to leave

0:09:24.085 --> 0:09:25.085
<v Speaker 2>that appointment that way.

0:09:25.605 --> 0:09:29.245
<v Speaker 1>Was anyone able to tell you what the future held

0:09:29.605 --> 0:09:30.285
<v Speaker 1>for McKenzie.

0:09:30.805 --> 0:09:35.645
<v Speaker 2>The neurologist was able to talk to us. We had

0:09:35.925 --> 0:09:39.085
<v Speaker 2>the first initial discussion as to whether to put her

0:09:39.085 --> 0:09:42.965
<v Speaker 2>on an experimental trial drug, and then we were told,

0:09:43.045 --> 0:09:45.045
<v Speaker 2>once we made the decision, that that was not the

0:09:45.125 --> 0:09:48.405
<v Speaker 2>right way for us and for her, based on a

0:09:48.605 --> 0:09:52.805
<v Speaker 2>whole number of levels. We were told she would likely

0:09:52.885 --> 0:09:55.325
<v Speaker 2>either get a cold and go in and out of

0:09:55.365 --> 0:09:58.125
<v Speaker 2>hospital for a lot of her life until she just

0:09:58.165 --> 0:10:01.365
<v Speaker 2>got so weak she couldn't fight it. Or we got

0:10:01.405 --> 0:10:03.685
<v Speaker 2>told that we would wake up one morning and she

0:10:04.005 --> 0:10:07.285
<v Speaker 2>would just die in her bascinet when we looked in there.

0:10:07.885 --> 0:10:09.045
<v Speaker 1>How long did you have with her?

0:10:09.845 --> 0:10:12.645
<v Speaker 2>So we had seven months and eleven days, I mean

0:10:12.645 --> 0:10:16.165
<v Speaker 2>obviously a near a few months after her diagnosis.

0:10:16.245 --> 0:10:20.045
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so, Rach, I can't even begin. And now everyone

0:10:20.405 --> 0:10:22.125
<v Speaker 1>says to you, I know, how do you get out

0:10:22.165 --> 0:10:23.925
<v Speaker 1>of bed? How do you do it? How do you live?

0:10:25.165 --> 0:10:26.085
<v Speaker 1>Do you have an answer to that?

0:10:26.565 --> 0:10:29.005
<v Speaker 2>You've got no choice? I mean, I suppose you do

0:10:29.085 --> 0:10:30.925
<v Speaker 2>have a choice. There are some people who don't come

0:10:31.005 --> 0:10:34.405
<v Speaker 2>through it, and they do take their own life. There

0:10:34.405 --> 0:10:38.245
<v Speaker 2>were certainly times where I wished myself to not be here.

0:10:39.125 --> 0:10:42.125
<v Speaker 2>After she was diagnosed, we knew that we had to

0:10:42.165 --> 0:10:46.165
<v Speaker 2>give her everything. So she was our reason of continuing

0:10:46.205 --> 0:10:49.045
<v Speaker 2>and getting out of bed every day until she passed away.

0:10:49.725 --> 0:10:52.125
<v Speaker 2>And then after that all of the days sort of

0:10:52.125 --> 0:10:56.885
<v Speaker 2>become a blur of pain, and then it became what

0:10:56.925 --> 0:11:00.765
<v Speaker 2>are we going to do for her to celebrate her life?

0:11:00.925 --> 0:11:03.685
<v Speaker 2>To help others not go through the same thing. Then

0:11:03.725 --> 0:11:06.605
<v Speaker 2>it was how we're going to get her siblings, and

0:11:06.645 --> 0:11:11.005
<v Speaker 2>so there was always something to fight for, and I

0:11:11.125 --> 0:11:15.165
<v Speaker 2>put everything I had into those Whether that was healthy always,

0:11:16.005 --> 0:11:18.645
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, but it was my way of coping.

0:11:19.205 --> 0:11:21.685
<v Speaker 1>In terms of trauma, it's hard to think of something

0:11:21.685 --> 0:11:26.725
<v Speaker 1>more traumatic and ongoing than what you experienced. Are there

0:11:26.765 --> 0:11:30.845
<v Speaker 1>certain things that trigger a response in your body, certain

0:11:30.885 --> 0:11:34.005
<v Speaker 1>things that abruptly distress you?

0:11:34.765 --> 0:11:38.605
<v Speaker 2>Yes, I mean there's some kind of obvious ones. I

0:11:38.645 --> 0:11:41.925
<v Speaker 2>don't think when it comes to triggers, they're not usually

0:11:41.965 --> 0:11:45.525
<v Speaker 2>obvious for people, even though society wants to assume that

0:11:45.565 --> 0:11:50.245
<v Speaker 2>they are. They're not. They're very specific and personalized. I mean,

0:11:50.285 --> 0:11:55.005
<v Speaker 2>my most generic, I suppose, was the sound of ambulances

0:11:55.565 --> 0:11:59.285
<v Speaker 2>because McKenzie stopped breathing at home in my arms, and

0:11:59.605 --> 0:12:03.845
<v Speaker 2>we rush our lights and sirens in an ambulance to

0:12:03.845 --> 0:12:06.925
<v Speaker 2>Sidney Children's Hospital and I just under in my lap

0:12:06.965 --> 0:12:10.085
<v Speaker 2>and I was just singing Twinkle Twinkle Star in her

0:12:10.125 --> 0:12:14.485
<v Speaker 2>ear as we drove. And so the sound of ambulances

0:12:14.845 --> 0:12:18.485
<v Speaker 2>it's not as prevalent a trigger anymore because I have

0:12:18.565 --> 0:12:20.965
<v Speaker 2>been exposed to it. You don't get a warning the

0:12:21.005 --> 0:12:24.365
<v Speaker 2>ambulances are around. I still have a little bit of

0:12:24.365 --> 0:12:26.565
<v Speaker 2>a because I know that on the end of that

0:12:26.645 --> 0:12:31.285
<v Speaker 2>ambulance is a family like mine. But my triggers are

0:12:32.045 --> 0:12:35.725
<v Speaker 2>for a while, obviously it was pregnancy announcements. I still

0:12:35.885 --> 0:12:40.805
<v Speaker 2>get triggered by large families. She is strange. I get

0:12:40.845 --> 0:12:45.285
<v Speaker 2>really triggered by positive thinking or magical thinking or manifestation.

0:12:46.325 --> 0:12:48.285
<v Speaker 2>I had a trigger the other day, which is quite

0:12:48.325 --> 0:12:50.485
<v Speaker 2>strange by Courtney Kardashian.

0:12:50.765 --> 0:12:51.445
<v Speaker 1>What did she do?

0:12:51.965 --> 0:12:57.725
<v Speaker 2>So she had her recent son had surgery in utero,

0:12:58.325 --> 0:13:02.485
<v Speaker 2>and the conversation with her was it was scary, but

0:13:02.885 --> 0:13:06.325
<v Speaker 2>I knew that if I just thought positively and if

0:13:06.365 --> 0:13:09.765
<v Speaker 2>I prayed to God, then everything would be okay. And

0:13:09.805 --> 0:13:13.645
<v Speaker 2>once I started thinking positively, the lung stopped filling up

0:13:13.685 --> 0:13:18.125
<v Speaker 2>with fluids. So that's really triggering for a lot of people,

0:13:18.245 --> 0:13:21.645
<v Speaker 2>especially in the baby loss community, because it's like or

0:13:22.045 --> 0:13:25.845
<v Speaker 2>any type of brief or losses like I did positive thinking.

0:13:26.285 --> 0:13:30.605
<v Speaker 2>I did everything you could possibly imagine for McKenzie to

0:13:30.805 --> 0:13:36.205
<v Speaker 2>wish and pray and positively make her better. But then

0:13:36.605 --> 0:13:39.325
<v Speaker 2>I did nine rounds of IVF. I lost another two

0:13:39.365 --> 0:13:42.365
<v Speaker 2>babies at sixteen weeks pregnant, that I had to walk

0:13:42.445 --> 0:13:46.245
<v Speaker 2>into the hospital and say goodbye to And I did everything.

0:13:46.765 --> 0:13:51.725
<v Speaker 2>I have done, soul work, inesiology, I have done negative

0:13:51.765 --> 0:13:55.085
<v Speaker 2>thinking in the hope that it would stop me from falling.

0:13:55.165 --> 0:13:59.125
<v Speaker 2>So far, I've written lists, I've done research. There is

0:13:59.165 --> 0:14:03.365
<v Speaker 2>not anything that I haven't done. And to hear someone say, well,

0:14:03.365 --> 0:14:07.085
<v Speaker 2>I prayed right or I did the right positive thinking,

0:14:07.125 --> 0:14:09.885
<v Speaker 2>and that's what happens, like, I understand the space for it,

0:14:09.965 --> 0:14:11.485
<v Speaker 2>but I find it really triggering.

0:14:12.205 --> 0:14:14.885
<v Speaker 1>When you say triggering, can you explain what happens in

0:14:15.525 --> 0:14:17.005
<v Speaker 1>your body and in your mind?

0:14:18.005 --> 0:14:23.925
<v Speaker 2>My heart starts racing, I get really sweaty hands. My

0:14:24.045 --> 0:14:27.965
<v Speaker 2>brain feels like it's a tornado. I can't catch my thought.

0:14:28.045 --> 0:14:30.765
<v Speaker 2>It just goes around and around, and then the conversation

0:14:31.005 --> 0:14:36.085
<v Speaker 2>that I have in my head won't stop for hours.

0:14:35.965 --> 0:14:39.565
<v Speaker 1>After the break. Why Rachel, who gets triggered all the time,

0:14:40.085 --> 0:14:52.645
<v Speaker 1>still doesn't want trigger warnings? So what have you learned

0:14:53.445 --> 0:14:57.165
<v Speaker 1>is the best way to cope or a way to cope?

0:14:57.205 --> 0:14:59.205
<v Speaker 1>How do you cope with that? Because obviously you want

0:14:59.205 --> 0:15:03.045
<v Speaker 1>to avoid those triggers, but how do you.

0:15:02.605 --> 0:15:06.805
<v Speaker 2>Well, I don't avoid the triggers because they're everywhere, you know,

0:15:06.885 --> 0:15:09.965
<v Speaker 2>hearing about children who have passed away, or any type

0:15:10.005 --> 0:15:13.125
<v Speaker 2>of grief that doesn't trigger me. It makes me feel

0:15:13.165 --> 0:15:16.565
<v Speaker 2>comforted in some ways, and that there are other people

0:15:16.965 --> 0:15:19.965
<v Speaker 2>who are out there who know how I feel. It

0:15:20.045 --> 0:15:24.285
<v Speaker 2>makes me sad that someone else knows that pain. Usually,

0:15:24.325 --> 0:15:27.045
<v Speaker 2>if it's someone on Instagram, for instance, I will usually

0:15:27.045 --> 0:15:30.525
<v Speaker 2>write to them in their DMS and say that I'm

0:15:30.565 --> 0:15:35.325
<v Speaker 2>here if they are new to this world of grief.

0:15:35.925 --> 0:15:38.565
<v Speaker 2>But I don't avoid them because the things that trigger

0:15:38.645 --> 0:15:42.565
<v Speaker 2>me are not things that come with trigger warnings. Sometimes

0:15:42.605 --> 0:15:45.685
<v Speaker 2>I'll read it and I will let my body go

0:15:45.765 --> 0:15:48.565
<v Speaker 2>through what it needs to go through because it's unavoidable.

0:15:48.965 --> 0:15:52.565
<v Speaker 2>Sometimes I will close an article or close something, but

0:15:52.685 --> 0:15:55.045
<v Speaker 2>I know that that means that that's something that I

0:15:55.085 --> 0:15:59.125
<v Speaker 2>need to work on. A trigger is obviously it's like

0:15:59.165 --> 0:16:02.485
<v Speaker 2>a little warning sign of Okay, there's something that's agitated there.

0:16:02.925 --> 0:16:04.405
<v Speaker 2>I'm probably going to have to work on that.

0:16:04.925 --> 0:16:08.285
<v Speaker 1>You wrote a fantastic piece first on your Instagram? What

0:16:08.365 --> 0:16:10.525
<v Speaker 1>led to that post on your Instagram?

0:16:10.925 --> 0:16:14.125
<v Speaker 2>So my Instagram is I created that space as a

0:16:14.125 --> 0:16:17.285
<v Speaker 2>way of sharing Mackenzie. I had no idea that it

0:16:17.405 --> 0:16:21.565
<v Speaker 2>was going to turn into the space that it is now,

0:16:22.165 --> 0:16:25.045
<v Speaker 2>but I have been trying so hard for it to

0:16:25.125 --> 0:16:28.725
<v Speaker 2>still remain in my space. It's my space, whether people

0:16:28.725 --> 0:16:30.965
<v Speaker 2>want to follow me or not. A lot of the

0:16:31.005 --> 0:16:34.045
<v Speaker 2>people who follow me have experienced some kinds of child

0:16:34.125 --> 0:16:37.405
<v Speaker 2>loss or loss, but I'm also really amazed that there's

0:16:37.445 --> 0:16:41.085
<v Speaker 2>also a lot of people who have an experienced loss

0:16:41.125 --> 0:16:44.445
<v Speaker 2>and they're just here to learn, which I love. I

0:16:44.525 --> 0:16:46.085
<v Speaker 2>have a lot of people who reach out to me

0:16:46.325 --> 0:16:49.325
<v Speaker 2>and say, my friend just had a stillborn and thanks

0:16:49.365 --> 0:16:51.005
<v Speaker 2>to you, I knew the right thing or the wrong

0:16:51.085 --> 0:16:55.125
<v Speaker 2>thing to say, so that is amazing. But occasionally someone

0:16:55.165 --> 0:16:58.125
<v Speaker 2>will come across my page, as they do on the internet,

0:16:58.565 --> 0:17:01.325
<v Speaker 2>and will have an opinion, and most of the time

0:17:01.445 --> 0:17:04.605
<v Speaker 2>I can block it out. But I remember I got

0:17:04.605 --> 0:17:08.645
<v Speaker 2>contacted by someone who Instagram had fed me to her

0:17:08.725 --> 0:17:12.525
<v Speaker 2>as a suggested page. She was pregnant with her second,

0:17:12.565 --> 0:17:14.765
<v Speaker 2>and she reached out to me to say, you should

0:17:14.805 --> 0:17:18.605
<v Speaker 2>put a trigger warning on your page. And I engaged

0:17:18.685 --> 0:17:21.685
<v Speaker 2>in conversation with her and I said, can you explain

0:17:21.725 --> 0:17:24.045
<v Speaker 2>to me why you think that, And she said, I'm

0:17:24.085 --> 0:17:28.325
<v Speaker 2>pregnant with my second and hearing about the possibility or

0:17:28.365 --> 0:17:30.925
<v Speaker 2>your life makes me stressed. And I'm like, so, let

0:17:30.965 --> 0:17:35.285
<v Speaker 2>me get this straight. You, as a very privileged person

0:17:35.525 --> 0:17:38.445
<v Speaker 2>who have got two healthy children as far as you know,

0:17:39.205 --> 0:17:44.005
<v Speaker 2>want me, someone who is experiencing trauma and pain, to

0:17:44.045 --> 0:17:46.845
<v Speaker 2>put a trigger warning on my child's life to make

0:17:46.925 --> 0:17:50.725
<v Speaker 2>you feel more comfortable. And that's what kicked off me

0:17:50.805 --> 0:17:52.085
<v Speaker 2>writing that post.

0:17:52.365 --> 0:17:55.365
<v Speaker 1>It's interesting your choice of words there. You say, put

0:17:55.365 --> 0:18:00.005
<v Speaker 1>a trigger warning on my child's life. That's exactly what

0:18:00.045 --> 0:18:02.885
<v Speaker 1>it is, isn't it. It's saying this might be so

0:18:03.085 --> 0:18:08.165
<v Speaker 1>upsetting to you, who never knew McKenzie and who isn't

0:18:08.205 --> 0:18:12.725
<v Speaker 1>her mother or her father, that I need to put

0:18:12.845 --> 0:18:18.285
<v Speaker 1>your feelings before my own and before honoring my daughter.

0:18:19.005 --> 0:18:24.005
<v Speaker 2>It's a way for people to curate their life because

0:18:24.405 --> 0:18:26.845
<v Speaker 2>I would say that ninety ninety percent of the time

0:18:26.925 --> 0:18:30.045
<v Speaker 2>the people who want the trigger warning haven't experienced that trauma,

0:18:30.485 --> 0:18:32.965
<v Speaker 2>because most of the people, at least in the child

0:18:33.005 --> 0:18:37.205
<v Speaker 2>lost community, do not want trigger warnings on their children.

0:18:37.565 --> 0:18:39.645
<v Speaker 2>We didn't get a warning that this was going to

0:18:39.685 --> 0:18:43.485
<v Speaker 2>happen to us, and we want to share our child

0:18:44.165 --> 0:18:47.605
<v Speaker 2>and to say put a trigger warning, it's like you're

0:18:47.765 --> 0:18:51.605
<v Speaker 2>telling me that my life is so bad and it

0:18:51.725 --> 0:18:55.205
<v Speaker 2>makes you uncomfortable that this exists in the world. So

0:18:55.245 --> 0:18:57.805
<v Speaker 2>you want to cover me up so you can curate

0:18:57.845 --> 0:19:02.125
<v Speaker 2>your world on what's positive in your mind, whereas I

0:19:02.165 --> 0:19:07.165
<v Speaker 2>see my daughter as positive, Like, yes, extreme pain, but

0:19:07.245 --> 0:19:11.085
<v Speaker 2>the gifts that she has given me are endless. She's

0:19:11.165 --> 0:19:12.245
<v Speaker 2>changed me for the better.

0:19:12.805 --> 0:19:15.725
<v Speaker 1>You said something really interesting in the piece you wrote

0:19:15.805 --> 0:19:19.565
<v Speaker 1>about this for Mamma Maya. You said, trigger warnings aren't

0:19:19.925 --> 0:19:23.085
<v Speaker 1>for people who've experienced things. They're for people who are

0:19:23.125 --> 0:19:27.885
<v Speaker 1>scared of experiencing those things. Because they're so often claimed

0:19:28.085 --> 0:19:32.045
<v Speaker 1>to be protective of the people who have experienced trauma,

0:19:32.085 --> 0:19:34.165
<v Speaker 1>and maybe in some cases they are. Maybe there are

0:19:34.205 --> 0:19:37.365
<v Speaker 1>some people who don't want to read about a particular

0:19:37.645 --> 0:19:42.285
<v Speaker 1>traumatic experience that they've gone through, but that's pretty subjective,

0:19:42.325 --> 0:19:42.725
<v Speaker 1>isn't it.

0:19:43.245 --> 0:19:46.685
<v Speaker 2>I still completely agree that they're not for the people

0:19:46.725 --> 0:19:49.445
<v Speaker 2>who have experienced the trauma for they're for the people

0:19:49.445 --> 0:19:53.165
<v Speaker 2>who are scared to experience the trauma and for those

0:19:53.245 --> 0:19:57.125
<v Speaker 2>who have had the trauma. I do feel bad for

0:19:57.165 --> 0:20:01.525
<v Speaker 2>any triggering moments, but studies have shown that one of

0:20:01.565 --> 0:20:05.125
<v Speaker 2>the best ways to be never going to get over

0:20:05.285 --> 0:20:07.645
<v Speaker 2>but one of the best ways to process what you've

0:20:07.685 --> 0:20:12.445
<v Speaker 2>gone through is to have of exposures. I really worry

0:20:12.525 --> 0:20:16.485
<v Speaker 2>about the curation of life and the feeling that we

0:20:16.565 --> 0:20:19.685
<v Speaker 2>need to start putting triggers on everything because you know,

0:20:19.725 --> 0:20:25.325
<v Speaker 2>where does it end? Because what triggers me is something

0:20:25.365 --> 0:20:27.805
<v Speaker 2>that I would never put someone like in the child

0:20:27.805 --> 0:20:31.005
<v Speaker 2>loss community, a lot of pregnancy announcements are triggering, And

0:20:31.045 --> 0:20:34.525
<v Speaker 2>now I'm starting to see pregnancy announcements with trigger warnings

0:20:34.525 --> 0:20:38.165
<v Speaker 2>for the people who are in the infertility space, and

0:20:38.205 --> 0:20:40.325
<v Speaker 2>it's like, no, I don't agree with trigger warnings on

0:20:40.365 --> 0:20:45.405
<v Speaker 2>that either, because that's someone's joy. You know. I just

0:20:45.445 --> 0:20:48.205
<v Speaker 2>don't believe in trigger warnings at all. I think in

0:20:48.285 --> 0:20:52.245
<v Speaker 2>some cases they might allow someone to avoid an article

0:20:52.365 --> 0:20:56.405
<v Speaker 2>for a short period of time, but in the long term,

0:20:56.445 --> 0:20:59.645
<v Speaker 2>it's not going to do that person any good for

0:20:59.725 --> 0:21:02.325
<v Speaker 2>everyone else. It's going to be negative. It's going to,

0:21:02.845 --> 0:21:05.925
<v Speaker 2>I guess, make us weak. It's not going to prepare

0:21:06.005 --> 0:21:06.685
<v Speaker 2>us for life.

0:21:08.045 --> 0:21:12.685
<v Speaker 1>So your philosophy is that we have responsibility for our

0:21:12.725 --> 0:21:16.005
<v Speaker 1>own emotions and our own mental health and we shouldn't

0:21:16.045 --> 0:21:19.085
<v Speaker 1>be outsourcing that to the Internet to protect us with

0:21:19.125 --> 0:21:19.925
<v Speaker 1>trigger warnings.

0:21:20.365 --> 0:21:23.445
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean it's very hard. I feel for people

0:21:23.485 --> 0:21:26.565
<v Speaker 2>with mental health issues. I am one of them. Yeah,

0:21:26.605 --> 0:21:30.525
<v Speaker 2>you know, I have a lot of diagnoses and on

0:21:30.605 --> 0:21:36.285
<v Speaker 2>the medication, and I do take responsibility for what I consume.

0:21:36.805 --> 0:21:39.165
<v Speaker 2>If I'm not in the right head space, then maybe

0:21:39.365 --> 0:21:42.485
<v Speaker 2>going on the internet's not the place for me. I

0:21:42.525 --> 0:21:45.525
<v Speaker 2>know that that can seem a bit harsh, and I

0:21:45.605 --> 0:21:48.925
<v Speaker 2>really appreciate that society these days are more inclusive of

0:21:49.005 --> 0:21:53.365
<v Speaker 2>people with mental health issues. I really appreciate that. Originally

0:21:53.405 --> 0:21:56.645
<v Speaker 2>the thought behind it was in the right space, but

0:21:56.765 --> 0:22:00.365
<v Speaker 2>the research shows that it doesn't work, and I just

0:22:00.405 --> 0:22:03.125
<v Speaker 2>think that they're doing more harm than goods, So it's

0:22:03.285 --> 0:22:05.365
<v Speaker 2>not for other people to protect me.

0:22:05.925 --> 0:22:09.005
<v Speaker 1>You've also spoken and written about trauma creep, because of course,

0:22:09.045 --> 0:22:12.045
<v Speaker 1>trigger warnings are meant to be for people who have

0:22:12.125 --> 0:22:16.445
<v Speaker 1>experienced trauma to avoid being retraumatized. The question of who's

0:22:16.525 --> 0:22:20.805
<v Speaker 1>trauma tized and what trauma is ties into this, doesn't it.

0:22:20.805 --> 0:22:22.605
<v Speaker 1>Can you explain what trauma creep is?

0:22:23.285 --> 0:22:26.405
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's the fact that some of the terminology that

0:22:26.445 --> 0:22:32.405
<v Speaker 2>we use in society is creeping out of the scientific,

0:22:32.885 --> 0:22:38.005
<v Speaker 2>psychological behavioral space and it's coming into everyday language. So

0:22:38.805 --> 0:22:41.285
<v Speaker 2>you know you're wanting something clean. Oh my god, I've

0:22:41.285 --> 0:22:46.885
<v Speaker 2>got OCD or traumatized, I've got PTSD from guy not

0:22:47.005 --> 0:22:52.245
<v Speaker 2>calling me. It's just this language that's so hyperbolic, that's

0:22:52.325 --> 0:22:57.765
<v Speaker 2>coming into our space, and it's using these really big

0:22:57.805 --> 0:23:02.525
<v Speaker 2>words in an everyday capacity. And where do the people

0:23:02.525 --> 0:23:07.365
<v Speaker 2>who actually have OCD PTSD, you know, where do they

0:23:07.485 --> 0:23:12.685
<v Speaker 2>actually sit now? What my trauma of my child passing

0:23:12.685 --> 0:23:16.565
<v Speaker 2>away and losing further children and everything else that I've

0:23:16.605 --> 0:23:21.445
<v Speaker 2>gone through that sits on par in a conversation like

0:23:21.525 --> 0:23:23.885
<v Speaker 2>obviously not when you're going deep, but in a conversation

0:23:24.045 --> 0:23:27.125
<v Speaker 2>with someone who burnt their tongue on a tea because

0:23:27.165 --> 0:23:30.525
<v Speaker 2>it was too hot. Like I just think that we've

0:23:30.565 --> 0:23:35.045
<v Speaker 2>got such a wide vocabulary in the English language that

0:23:35.125 --> 0:23:39.005
<v Speaker 2>we can start using some of the less dramatic words.

0:23:39.565 --> 0:23:44.925
<v Speaker 2>I'm sad, I'm disappointed, I'm upset. I don't like hearing

0:23:45.005 --> 0:23:48.285
<v Speaker 2>that just being careful with your language, So.

0:23:48.325 --> 0:23:50.805
<v Speaker 1>Rach, have you been changing minds? You've been talking about

0:23:50.845 --> 0:23:53.445
<v Speaker 1>this for quite a long time. Now. Have you seen a.

0:23:53.485 --> 0:23:57.765
<v Speaker 2>Shift so my post around trigger warnings? I think I

0:23:57.925 --> 0:24:02.325
<v Speaker 2>was surprised that it actually took off. I saw a

0:24:02.325 --> 0:24:07.405
<v Speaker 2>lot of other fellow lost parents also talking about trigger warnings.

0:24:07.485 --> 0:24:10.885
<v Speaker 2>I saw a really nice rippler, at least within my community.

0:24:11.285 --> 0:24:14.125
<v Speaker 2>I think the conversation is happening I think it is

0:24:14.445 --> 0:24:15.845
<v Speaker 2>developing momentum.

0:24:16.045 --> 0:24:19.365
<v Speaker 1>That's beautiful. Rate. Thank you so much. And after the

0:24:19.405 --> 0:24:22.525
<v Speaker 1>break you're going to hear from Victoria Bridgeland, the Australian

0:24:22.605 --> 0:24:26.285
<v Speaker 1>academic whose research into trigger warnings has changed the way

0:24:26.365 --> 0:24:37.965
<v Speaker 1>people all over the world are thinking about them. Can

0:24:38.005 --> 0:24:40.205
<v Speaker 1>you give us your working definition of the trigger warning?

0:24:40.605 --> 0:24:42.365
<v Speaker 3>So there's all kinds of warnings you can get for

0:24:42.365 --> 0:24:44.525
<v Speaker 3>different things. Obviously you can get those film warnings. You

0:24:44.525 --> 0:24:47.645
<v Speaker 3>can get warnings for like content containing indigenous persons, So

0:24:47.685 --> 0:24:49.405
<v Speaker 3>we're not talking about any of those kind of warnings,

0:24:49.405 --> 0:24:52.765
<v Speaker 3>although I think film warnings are probably like an early ancestor.

0:24:53.325 --> 0:24:56.325
<v Speaker 3>A true trigger warning is something that warns you about

0:24:56.445 --> 0:24:59.845
<v Speaker 3>something that might be potentially distressing, and that's probably going

0:24:59.885 --> 0:25:02.205
<v Speaker 3>to be potentially distressing because of something that's happened to

0:25:02.205 --> 0:25:04.485
<v Speaker 3>you in the past or present, So maybe a traumatic

0:25:04.525 --> 0:25:07.685
<v Speaker 3>event or like a mental health related issue could be depression,

0:25:07.725 --> 0:25:10.645
<v Speaker 3>anxiety or that kind of So it's really just warning

0:25:10.685 --> 0:25:13.565
<v Speaker 3>you about upcoming negative content that's probably related to you

0:25:13.605 --> 0:25:16.605
<v Speaker 3>in some personal way, rather than just generally negative content.

0:25:16.805 --> 0:25:20.085
<v Speaker 1>What's the difference between a trigger warning and a content warning?

0:25:20.405 --> 0:25:22.445
<v Speaker 3>They're sort of one and the same thing. Every now

0:25:22.485 --> 0:25:24.845
<v Speaker 3>and then trigger warnings will go through a rebrand because

0:25:24.925 --> 0:25:27.485
<v Speaker 3>they are starting to get more heat against them because

0:25:27.485 --> 0:25:30.285
<v Speaker 3>of the evidence coming out and people say, I don't

0:25:30.285 --> 0:25:32.365
<v Speaker 3>think they work, and so people go, oh, we're not

0:25:32.445 --> 0:25:34.045
<v Speaker 3>using a trigger warning, and we'll now we're using a

0:25:34.085 --> 0:25:36.965
<v Speaker 3>content warning. But it's really the same thing repackaged. I've

0:25:36.965 --> 0:25:39.485
<v Speaker 3>even seen people say that the term trigger is too

0:25:39.525 --> 0:25:42.365
<v Speaker 3>triggering because it evokes gun imagery, and so people are

0:25:42.405 --> 0:25:45.005
<v Speaker 3>saying we shouldn't use that term at all because it's violent,

0:25:45.125 --> 0:25:47.845
<v Speaker 3>and so maybe we should use like can notes or

0:25:47.885 --> 0:25:49.885
<v Speaker 3>like I don't know, other counting. But really it's doing

0:25:49.925 --> 0:25:51.885
<v Speaker 3>the same thing. If the purpose of it is to

0:25:51.925 --> 0:25:55.165
<v Speaker 3>warn people about a mental health related thing or a trauma,

0:25:55.205 --> 0:25:57.525
<v Speaker 3>which is what they are for, then it's a triger warning.

0:25:57.765 --> 0:25:59.805
<v Speaker 3>So that's sort of how I define it. It's like

0:25:59.845 --> 0:26:02.525
<v Speaker 3>what they're used for rather than what they are because

0:26:02.525 --> 0:26:05.085
<v Speaker 3>they come in all different forms and shapes and things.

0:26:05.365 --> 0:26:06.605
<v Speaker 1>So what does the science say?

0:26:06.965 --> 0:26:09.885
<v Speaker 3>Pretty extensive number of studies now, I think we've got

0:26:09.925 --> 0:26:12.125
<v Speaker 3>about ten to fifteen. There's probably a few more that

0:26:12.165 --> 0:26:15.845
<v Speaker 3>have come out since WIT did our meta analysis on them. Basically,

0:26:16.125 --> 0:26:18.325
<v Speaker 3>they don't only do much of anything except for me,

0:26:18.565 --> 0:26:20.725
<v Speaker 3>people feel anxious when they first see them. So people

0:26:20.765 --> 0:26:23.205
<v Speaker 3>see a trigger warning, they feel a little bit anxious

0:26:23.245 --> 0:26:26.965
<v Speaker 3>about what's coming up, sort of like apprehension or anticipatory anxiety,

0:26:27.485 --> 0:26:30.085
<v Speaker 3>not very large anxiety, but just like a small amount of,

0:26:30.085 --> 0:26:33.325
<v Speaker 3>you know, something, negatives coming. When people see the content

0:26:33.405 --> 0:26:36.885
<v Speaker 3>after that, it doesn't reduce any negative feelings towards it,

0:26:37.445 --> 0:26:39.125
<v Speaker 3>So it doesn't seem to be doing any of that

0:26:39.205 --> 0:26:42.605
<v Speaker 3>emotional preparation. I can't find any evidence of that at all,

0:26:42.765 --> 0:26:46.365
<v Speaker 3>even for people like in target groups that people would say, Okay,

0:26:46.365 --> 0:26:48.725
<v Speaker 3>well you've just looked at the general population, but we've

0:26:48.765 --> 0:26:51.045
<v Speaker 3>also looked at trauma survivors. We've also looked a people

0:26:51.045 --> 0:26:53.405
<v Speaker 3>with depression. We've also looked to people with anxiety, and

0:26:53.445 --> 0:26:55.645
<v Speaker 3>it doesn't seem to help any of these people. Across

0:26:55.685 --> 0:26:58.045
<v Speaker 3>the board, everyone just feels the same when they see

0:26:58.085 --> 0:27:01.405
<v Speaker 3>the content. And as for avoidance, that is probably more

0:27:01.445 --> 0:27:04.925
<v Speaker 3>of a weird Iceberg scenario where there's so much weird

0:27:04.925 --> 0:27:07.645
<v Speaker 3>stuff going on with avoidance with tree warnings or just

0:27:07.685 --> 0:27:10.965
<v Speaker 3>avoidance of negative stuff in general. So I guess people

0:27:10.965 --> 0:27:14.885
<v Speaker 3>would assume that humans are quite logical beings that if

0:27:14.965 --> 0:27:16.845
<v Speaker 3>you see something negative that you don't want to see,

0:27:16.925 --> 0:27:19.405
<v Speaker 3>you should avoid it. But what we find is humans

0:27:19.445 --> 0:27:23.085
<v Speaker 3>actually have this huge propensity towards small butid curiosity, and

0:27:23.165 --> 0:27:25.925
<v Speaker 3>so even though people probably know something's going to make

0:27:25.965 --> 0:27:27.965
<v Speaker 3>them upset, people want to look at it anyway. And

0:27:28.005 --> 0:27:30.245
<v Speaker 3>so in a lot of my studies, I found like

0:27:30.285 --> 0:27:33.805
<v Speaker 3>such a tiny avoidance rate of anything negative. Even when

0:27:34.165 --> 0:27:38.365
<v Speaker 3>we're like continually exposing people to the nastiest photos in

0:27:38.405 --> 0:27:40.845
<v Speaker 3>our photo sets, which are quite traumatic photos of actual

0:27:40.885 --> 0:27:43.565
<v Speaker 3>like dead bodies and things. You can keep showing people

0:27:43.685 --> 0:27:45.325
<v Speaker 3>them and say to them you don't have to see them,

0:27:45.325 --> 0:27:47.645
<v Speaker 3>because we'll have a screen on them, like those Instagram

0:27:47.725 --> 0:27:50.125
<v Speaker 3>blurred warning screens, and we'll say you don't have to

0:27:50.205 --> 0:27:51.765
<v Speaker 3>uncover this if you don't want to go to the

0:27:51.765 --> 0:27:54.485
<v Speaker 3>next photo. People will just keep uncovering them again and

0:27:54.525 --> 0:27:56.845
<v Speaker 3>again and again. Most of our studies we found like

0:27:56.885 --> 0:28:00.645
<v Speaker 3>fifty percent of people will just uncover every single negative

0:28:00.645 --> 0:28:03.565
<v Speaker 3>photo that we've shown them, which is quite a high number.

0:28:03.605 --> 0:28:06.725
<v Speaker 3>And then as for like the first few photos, about

0:28:06.925 --> 0:28:10.085
<v Speaker 3>eighty to ninety percent of people will instantly cover that photo.

0:28:10.125 --> 0:28:11.685
<v Speaker 3>So there is a drop off of like people that

0:28:11.765 --> 0:28:13.445
<v Speaker 3>do see the negative thing and go okay, maybe I

0:28:13.445 --> 0:28:15.885
<v Speaker 3>don't want to look at anymore, but most people are

0:28:16.285 --> 0:28:18.365
<v Speaker 3>just keep wanting to look at stuff. Victoria.

0:28:18.405 --> 0:28:21.925
<v Speaker 1>What's the difference between that, Because people could argue, well,

0:28:21.965 --> 0:28:25.125
<v Speaker 1>you've given them a choice right, as opposed to the

0:28:25.165 --> 0:28:30.965
<v Speaker 1>physiological reaction of when that image or those words might

0:28:31.045 --> 0:28:33.565
<v Speaker 1>just be put in front of me without you telling

0:28:33.605 --> 0:28:36.605
<v Speaker 1>me that it might distress me or that it's graphic.

0:28:37.125 --> 0:28:39.605
<v Speaker 3>I don't think it would make much of a difference

0:28:39.645 --> 0:28:43.445
<v Speaker 3>because I just don't think unless you're specifically instructing somebody

0:28:43.685 --> 0:28:46.725
<v Speaker 3>on how to reduce that reaction, I don't think the

0:28:46.765 --> 0:28:49.645
<v Speaker 3>Triger warnings doing anything at all. There's no way to

0:28:49.725 --> 0:28:53.005
<v Speaker 3>emotionally inoculate yourself just using a language from trigger warnings,

0:28:53.085 --> 0:28:55.965
<v Speaker 3>unless you're, like maybe if you've been going through like

0:28:56.085 --> 0:29:00.445
<v Speaker 3>years of therapy or you know about certain emotion regulation techniques,

0:29:00.805 --> 0:29:04.165
<v Speaker 3>maybe you can. But it's a really like abstracto morphous

0:29:04.245 --> 0:29:07.285
<v Speaker 3>thing to ask somebody to like stop themselves having a

0:29:07.285 --> 0:29:10.765
<v Speaker 3>reaction towards something, or you don't know the technique. So

0:29:11.165 --> 0:29:13.845
<v Speaker 3>usually when something's negative, it's got something unique and weird

0:29:13.885 --> 0:29:16.845
<v Speaker 3>about it, it's socially devient about it, and so people

0:29:16.845 --> 0:29:19.565
<v Speaker 3>are very attractive to that to gain that information and

0:29:19.645 --> 0:29:22.205
<v Speaker 3>maybe learn something about how to protect themselves, or learn

0:29:22.245 --> 0:29:25.485
<v Speaker 3>something about the world and how to be safe maybe

0:29:25.565 --> 0:29:27.845
<v Speaker 3>or avoid threads. So we do have, I think, this

0:29:27.885 --> 0:29:30.125
<v Speaker 3>sort of thing in us to sort of seek things.

0:29:30.525 --> 0:29:33.285
<v Speaker 3>But what's even more, I guess disturbing about it is

0:29:34.045 --> 0:29:36.645
<v Speaker 3>a lot of disorders as well have this propensity. So

0:29:36.685 --> 0:29:40.325
<v Speaker 3>we would think somebody that's feeling depressed would be motivated

0:29:40.365 --> 0:29:43.365
<v Speaker 3>to repair their mood, But what we actually find is

0:29:43.405 --> 0:29:47.085
<v Speaker 3>that depressed people often because feeling depressed and feeling sad

0:29:47.165 --> 0:29:49.565
<v Speaker 3>is a familiar mood state, they want to stay in

0:29:49.605 --> 0:29:52.645
<v Speaker 3>that mood and they want to like purposely seek content

0:29:52.685 --> 0:29:54.885
<v Speaker 3>that makes them feel even more depressed, and then they

0:29:54.965 --> 0:29:56.725
<v Speaker 3>go down these sort of Internet rabbit holes and the

0:29:56.925 --> 0:29:58.965
<v Speaker 3>algorithm feeds it and all that kind of stuff. It's

0:29:59.045 --> 0:30:00.525
<v Speaker 3>kind of like when you're sad and you listen to

0:30:00.605 --> 0:30:02.845
<v Speaker 3>a sad playlist, it's like that feeling.

0:30:02.565 --> 0:30:05.325
<v Speaker 1>You want to see it mirrored. And that really gets

0:30:05.405 --> 0:30:08.605
<v Speaker 1>to the heart of what this is about, doesn't it.

0:30:08.605 --> 0:30:13.125
<v Speaker 1>It's this dejective nature of how trigger warnings are used

0:30:13.285 --> 0:30:16.245
<v Speaker 1>and what they're meant to do versus what they do

0:30:16.245 --> 0:30:20.525
<v Speaker 1>do and who benefits from them and who suffers because

0:30:20.565 --> 0:30:24.045
<v Speaker 1>of them. That's the point, isn't it That you can't

0:30:24.725 --> 0:30:28.845
<v Speaker 1>take into account how someone will use a piece of information,

0:30:29.245 --> 0:30:32.645
<v Speaker 1>So even warning someone about that information can have a

0:30:32.685 --> 0:30:34.165
<v Speaker 1>detrimental effect on them.

0:30:34.525 --> 0:30:36.845
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think so, And I think it's really that

0:30:37.245 --> 0:30:40.725
<v Speaker 3>individual difference thing as well as because no matter how

0:30:40.765 --> 0:30:43.485
<v Speaker 3>much evidence we have that like for most people, they

0:30:43.485 --> 0:30:45.645
<v Speaker 3>don't work. And when I mean most people, I mean

0:30:45.885 --> 0:30:49.405
<v Speaker 3>general population, people with different disorders we've screened for and

0:30:49.445 --> 0:30:51.725
<v Speaker 3>things like that, there'll be that one person that will

0:30:51.765 --> 0:30:53.325
<v Speaker 3>be like, no, but they help me, and then so

0:30:53.365 --> 0:30:55.925
<v Speaker 3>you can. You know, there's always these different arguments that

0:30:55.925 --> 0:30:57.725
<v Speaker 3>will be brought up about how they help will harm.

0:30:57.805 --> 0:31:00.925
<v Speaker 3>But I think the biggest danger though in triger warnings

0:31:00.965 --> 0:31:04.725
<v Speaker 3>is assuming that they're doing great benefit to anybody. No

0:31:04.765 --> 0:31:06.605
<v Speaker 3>matter how you slice it, I just think they're not

0:31:06.725 --> 0:31:10.005
<v Speaker 3>doing much at all of anything. They're not they're definitely

0:31:10.045 --> 0:31:12.525
<v Speaker 3>not helping, and there's some evidence that they're probably doing

0:31:12.525 --> 0:31:15.845
<v Speaker 3>some harm. But it's just really bad to assume that

0:31:16.085 --> 0:31:18.045
<v Speaker 3>as long as you slap a trigger warning on any

0:31:18.045 --> 0:31:21.525
<v Speaker 3>piece of media, you're protecting people. Or you know, if

0:31:21.525 --> 0:31:24.125
<v Speaker 3>a professor just puts a trigger warning on their class material,

0:31:24.125 --> 0:31:25.925
<v Speaker 3>but doesn't think about how the class will receive it

0:31:26.045 --> 0:31:28.685
<v Speaker 3>or for any support, or it's like a band aid

0:31:28.765 --> 0:31:31.045
<v Speaker 3>to sort of slap on things and try and fix

0:31:31.245 --> 0:31:34.565
<v Speaker 3>this mental health crisis that we're always talking about. Because

0:31:34.565 --> 0:31:37.165
<v Speaker 3>it's really easy and it's cheap, you know, for social

0:31:37.205 --> 0:31:38.925
<v Speaker 3>media websites, so I can just put it on there

0:31:38.925 --> 0:31:40.365
<v Speaker 3>and I have to do anything else, I have to

0:31:40.365 --> 0:31:43.485
<v Speaker 3>invest anything in anything. It seems like a really good solution,

0:31:43.565 --> 0:31:45.885
<v Speaker 3>but it just doesn't do anything. It doesn't help anybody.

0:31:46.765 --> 0:31:49.685
<v Speaker 1>One thing I've noticed over the years is that when

0:31:49.725 --> 0:31:51.845
<v Speaker 1>we're criticized at mum and Mea for not putting a

0:31:51.885 --> 0:31:55.405
<v Speaker 1>trigger warning on something, because a while ago I noticed

0:31:55.445 --> 0:31:58.805
<v Speaker 1>that there had been trigger creep on Muma Mea articles

0:31:58.845 --> 0:32:03.085
<v Speaker 1>and Muma Mea podcasts, and I asked the team about

0:32:03.245 --> 0:32:07.605
<v Speaker 1>why that was, and they said that we would often

0:32:07.765 --> 0:32:11.325
<v Speaker 1>get complaints, not from lot of people, but the people

0:32:11.325 --> 0:32:14.605
<v Speaker 1>who did complain would complain very loudly and be very

0:32:14.605 --> 0:32:18.285
<v Speaker 1>insistent that trigger warnings were required and that we should

0:32:18.285 --> 0:32:21.125
<v Speaker 1>have put a trigger warning on this podcast or on

0:32:21.165 --> 0:32:24.885
<v Speaker 1>that piece of content. Often when it might just be

0:32:25.005 --> 0:32:28.165
<v Speaker 1>someone mentioning that they had a miscarriage or that they

0:32:28.205 --> 0:32:31.285
<v Speaker 1>had experienced domestic violence and not going into any detail,

0:32:31.365 --> 0:32:33.645
<v Speaker 1>and maybe that in many cases that wasn't even the

0:32:33.645 --> 0:32:35.965
<v Speaker 1>main part of the story. It just happened to be,

0:32:36.205 --> 0:32:39.245
<v Speaker 1>maybe even just those words that they mentioned. And what

0:32:39.325 --> 0:32:42.245
<v Speaker 1>I noticed when talking to the team is that the

0:32:42.325 --> 0:32:47.365
<v Speaker 1>people who complained were almost never the people who'd actually

0:32:47.405 --> 0:32:52.605
<v Speaker 1>experienced those things. It's usually the complainers, and the polices

0:32:52.765 --> 0:32:56.085
<v Speaker 1>of trigger warnings and content warnings are the people who've

0:32:56.125 --> 0:33:00.205
<v Speaker 1>decided it's their job to protect whoever they perceived might

0:33:00.325 --> 0:33:03.925
<v Speaker 1>be well, you know, triggered. And again, I want to

0:33:03.925 --> 0:33:08.845
<v Speaker 1>believe that they are well intentioned, but as you've heard,

0:33:08.925 --> 0:33:12.365
<v Speaker 1>I've always just had a really deep, visceral reaction against

0:33:12.485 --> 0:33:15.685
<v Speaker 1>trigger warnings. And on a show like this on No Filter,

0:33:16.245 --> 0:33:19.365
<v Speaker 1>we hear from people who've lived through some really heavy things,

0:33:19.725 --> 0:33:24.205
<v Speaker 1>from real survivors of abuse and violence, of addiction, of racism,

0:33:24.685 --> 0:33:27.325
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of trauma. People like Rachel, people who've

0:33:27.325 --> 0:33:32.285
<v Speaker 1>suffered unimaginable loss and experience things that most of us

0:33:32.685 --> 0:33:36.165
<v Speaker 1>hopefully will never experience, and they've come out on the

0:33:36.165 --> 0:33:39.645
<v Speaker 1>other side with a really important story to tell. And

0:33:39.725 --> 0:33:42.565
<v Speaker 1>I think, as Rachel does, that putting a trigger warning

0:33:42.565 --> 0:33:45.685
<v Speaker 1>on their stories, I don't know. I think it cheapens

0:33:45.725 --> 0:33:48.165
<v Speaker 1>them in a way, and I think it patronizes you,

0:33:48.565 --> 0:33:52.525
<v Speaker 1>the listener, who I really believe has the resilience and

0:33:52.565 --> 0:33:55.845
<v Speaker 1>the ability to choose what you want to consume and

0:33:55.925 --> 0:34:00.285
<v Speaker 1>avoid what you don't. And I know personally there are

0:34:00.325 --> 0:34:04.165
<v Speaker 1>several things, actually many things that trigger me, and none

0:34:04.205 --> 0:34:07.405
<v Speaker 1>of them would be covered by trigger warnings in the

0:34:07.445 --> 0:34:11.965
<v Speaker 1>way that they're understood. What triggers upsetting or uncomfortable feelings

0:34:12.045 --> 0:34:14.445
<v Speaker 1>is totally unique to each of us, right, and it

0:34:14.525 --> 0:34:17.805
<v Speaker 1>must be the responsibility, in my opinion, of each of

0:34:17.885 --> 0:34:21.365
<v Speaker 1>us to manage because the alternative to that is to

0:34:21.405 --> 0:34:24.965
<v Speaker 1>outsource your mental well being to the internet. And is

0:34:24.965 --> 0:34:27.725
<v Speaker 1>that something that we really want to do rely on

0:34:27.765 --> 0:34:32.005
<v Speaker 1>the outside world to manage our feelings. The outside world

0:34:32.085 --> 0:34:34.965
<v Speaker 1>is not our helicopter, and that sounds like a really

0:34:35.085 --> 0:34:39.445
<v Speaker 1>terrible idea to me. So what Rachel's story and Victoria's

0:34:39.485 --> 0:34:43.205
<v Speaker 1>research really just validate for me is that we have

0:34:43.285 --> 0:34:45.365
<v Speaker 1>to be our own gatekeepers when it comes to how

0:34:45.365 --> 0:34:48.525
<v Speaker 1>we navigate the world, whether it's our screens and our phones,

0:34:48.965 --> 0:34:52.445
<v Speaker 1>or books and movies, or what's taught in a classroom,

0:34:52.725 --> 0:34:54.805
<v Speaker 1>and of course the stories that we bring you here

0:34:54.845 --> 0:34:58.045
<v Speaker 1>at No Filter and at Muma Maya. Now I still

0:34:58.045 --> 0:35:00.205
<v Speaker 1>wrestle with this. Sometimes it's not black and white. If

0:35:00.245 --> 0:35:04.045
<v Speaker 1>you listen to our episode with dassy Erlick a few

0:35:04.085 --> 0:35:08.405
<v Speaker 1>weeks ago, she suffered horrendous abuse of a really quite

0:35:08.485 --> 0:35:10.885
<v Speaker 1>graphic nature, and so I did in the end at

0:35:10.925 --> 0:35:13.325
<v Speaker 1>a content warning because you described some of that abuse.

0:35:14.245 --> 0:35:16.525
<v Speaker 1>And sometimes there might be a little ears in the

0:35:16.725 --> 0:35:19.765
<v Speaker 1>car with you, or you might be listening in a

0:35:19.805 --> 0:35:22.765
<v Speaker 1>public place, like in your kitchen while you're cooking, and

0:35:22.805 --> 0:35:26.645
<v Speaker 1>there's other people around. So I think it's important also

0:35:26.805 --> 0:35:28.885
<v Speaker 1>that we provide resources for people who are triggered by

0:35:28.925 --> 0:35:31.405
<v Speaker 1>the content in our stories. And we're very careful to

0:35:31.445 --> 0:35:34.165
<v Speaker 1>always provide links to be on Blue or Lifeline or

0:35:34.205 --> 0:35:38.365
<v Speaker 1>other specialized organizations, and we've done that today for anyone

0:35:38.485 --> 0:35:41.525
<v Speaker 1>who needs a bit of extra support after listening to

0:35:41.645 --> 0:35:45.485
<v Speaker 1>Rachel's story. But a big, bright, flashing red trigger warning

0:35:45.565 --> 0:35:48.285
<v Speaker 1>scaring people away before they can make up their own mind,

0:35:49.005 --> 0:35:51.005
<v Speaker 1>you're not going to find that on No Filter. But

0:35:51.045 --> 0:35:52.925
<v Speaker 1>I want to know what you think. I have strong

0:35:52.965 --> 0:35:56.765
<v Speaker 1>opinions loosely held, and I'm really curious to hear from you.

0:35:56.765 --> 0:35:59.445
<v Speaker 1>You are the ones I'm thinking about when I think

0:35:59.445 --> 0:36:02.525
<v Speaker 1>about trigger warnings on this show, So let me know.

0:36:03.045 --> 0:36:05.965
<v Speaker 1>Maybe I'll share some of your feedback in one of

0:36:06.005 --> 0:36:08.885
<v Speaker 1>my Insta bubbles on my Instagram account at mea Friedman,

0:36:09.445 --> 0:36:12.365
<v Speaker 1>or in my Babbel newsletter which you have to sign

0:36:12.405 --> 0:36:14.725
<v Speaker 1>up for but it comes free to your inbox. Will

0:36:14.725 --> 0:36:16.485
<v Speaker 1>pop a link to that in the show notes as well.

0:36:17.365 --> 0:36:20.085
<v Speaker 1>So there you are trigger warnings, Love them, payd them,

0:36:20.285 --> 0:36:22.925
<v Speaker 1>have a think. Are you triggered by trigger warnings? Share

0:36:22.965 --> 0:36:25.045
<v Speaker 1>this episode with your friends and have a good old

0:36:25.045 --> 0:36:28.165
<v Speaker 1>fashioned debate and let me know where you land. The

0:36:28.245 --> 0:36:31.565
<v Speaker 1>executive producer of No Filter is Niama Brown. She's not

0:36:31.605 --> 0:36:34.765
<v Speaker 1>a fan of trigger warnings either. Our audio producer is

0:36:34.845 --> 0:36:37.925
<v Speaker 1>Leiah Porges, and she's on the fence. See lots of

0:36:37.965 --> 0:36:41.405
<v Speaker 1>opinions over here at MMA. Miya, I'm mea Friedman. Thanks

0:36:41.445 --> 0:36:42.765
<v Speaker 1>for listening. That's of laugh