WEBVTT - Miranda Kerr’s Money Tree & Karl’s ‘Martyr Strategy’ 

0:00:02.920 --> 0:00:06.520
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome out Louders to Mama Mia. Out loud

0:00:06.559 --> 0:00:08.840
<v Speaker 1>It's what women are actually talking about on Monday, the

0:00:08.880 --> 0:00:09.920
<v Speaker 1>twenty ninth of June.

0:00:10.000 --> 0:00:13.000
<v Speaker 2>My name is Hollywayne Wright, I'm Claire Stephens.

0:00:12.680 --> 0:00:13.880
<v Speaker 3>And I'm Amelia Luster.

0:00:14.080 --> 0:00:19.200
<v Speaker 1>Oh it's Amelia Leicester's birthday. And you may have noticed

0:00:19.200 --> 0:00:21.319
<v Speaker 1>this last week. I know some out louders did. But

0:00:21.480 --> 0:00:23.720
<v Speaker 1>one of the things we're doing to make Amelia Leicester

0:00:23.760 --> 0:00:27.479
<v Speaker 1>feel special is bring her boyfriend into the studio. That

0:00:27.640 --> 0:00:28.760
<v Speaker 1>is what's Simon.

0:00:28.440 --> 0:00:31.440
<v Speaker 3>Baker, and he does make me podcast better.

0:00:32.520 --> 0:00:35.200
<v Speaker 2>We replaced the creepy photo of Jesse with Simon Baker.

0:00:35.360 --> 0:00:36.520
<v Speaker 1>And how are you feeling?

0:00:36.520 --> 0:00:38.760
<v Speaker 2>I feel better about it. I feel a lot better

0:00:38.760 --> 0:00:39.239
<v Speaker 2>about it.

0:00:39.400 --> 0:00:42.680
<v Speaker 1>We were talking last week, Amelia about how Stephen Bartlett

0:00:42.760 --> 0:00:44.960
<v Speaker 1>Diary of the CEO had three glasses of wine and

0:00:45.040 --> 0:00:47.000
<v Speaker 1>that reckoned he couldn't podcast for the rest of the week.

0:00:47.159 --> 0:00:48.440
<v Speaker 1>How did your birthday drinks?

0:00:48.680 --> 0:00:48.800
<v Speaker 2>Yes?

0:00:48.880 --> 0:00:51.240
<v Speaker 3>Why? I think it was a mind over matter situation

0:00:51.479 --> 0:00:53.880
<v Speaker 3>because I did have birth to drinks last night. I

0:00:53.920 --> 0:00:56.800
<v Speaker 3>bought new friends and old friends together. Some of them

0:00:56.840 --> 0:00:59.040
<v Speaker 3>are out louders. I'll let them be the judge on

0:00:59.120 --> 0:01:01.960
<v Speaker 3>how the mingling of groups Wench, but I am not

0:01:02.080 --> 0:01:03.520
<v Speaker 3>hungover today. Amazing.

0:01:04.720 --> 0:01:10.280
<v Speaker 1>She's so much better than Stephen Parler. Well, we're going

0:01:10.360 --> 0:01:12.920
<v Speaker 1>to get to him. Here's what's on our agenda today.

0:01:13.080 --> 0:01:16.920
<v Speaker 1>Miranda Kerr and her billionaire husband just waived a magic

0:01:17.120 --> 0:01:20.200
<v Speaker 1>money wand and changed the lives of thousands of Americans.

0:01:20.600 --> 0:01:22.200
<v Speaker 1>Amelia knows why.

0:01:22.400 --> 0:01:27.720
<v Speaker 2>Plus Karl Stefanovic's martyrdom strategy. Do we think it's going

0:01:27.760 --> 0:01:29.919
<v Speaker 2>to work? And where do we think he's going next?

0:01:30.400 --> 0:01:33.840
<v Speaker 3>And this is the week Taylor Swift is getting married,

0:01:33.880 --> 0:01:37.440
<v Speaker 3>and we have the New York Times verified details.

0:01:37.640 --> 0:01:42.160
<v Speaker 1>But first, in case you missed it, it's tax time, friends,

0:01:42.920 --> 0:01:46.240
<v Speaker 1>and some people are delighted about that. Some people are

0:01:46.280 --> 0:01:49.800
<v Speaker 1>in an admin spiral. Some people are planning a shopping hall.

0:01:50.400 --> 0:01:53.600
<v Speaker 1>King Charles obviously saw all the fun everyone has at

0:01:53.600 --> 0:01:56.200
<v Speaker 1>tax time and decided he wanted in.

0:01:56.400 --> 0:01:59.080
<v Speaker 2>I bet he's gone to office works. He totally gets

0:01:59.080 --> 0:02:01.240
<v Speaker 2>some little snacky snow and a whiteboard.

0:02:01.440 --> 0:02:05.000
<v Speaker 1>He has he totally has because for the first time ever,

0:02:05.520 --> 0:02:09.920
<v Speaker 1>senior royals are revealing their tax returns. Right to be clear,

0:02:09.960 --> 0:02:13.560
<v Speaker 1>they don't have to, so royals don't even have to

0:02:13.600 --> 0:02:17.000
<v Speaker 1>pay tax, but they the Queen changed the game on

0:02:17.040 --> 0:02:19.480
<v Speaker 1>that and started paying tax back in nineteen ninety three,

0:02:19.840 --> 0:02:22.600
<v Speaker 1>but they've never had to declare how much or have

0:02:22.720 --> 0:02:25.600
<v Speaker 1>it made public. But Charles, we've talked about this on

0:02:25.639 --> 0:02:28.240
<v Speaker 1>the show a lot. Charles and William keep saying that

0:02:28.240 --> 0:02:30.920
<v Speaker 1>they're going to change things, that they want more transparency

0:02:30.960 --> 0:02:32.920
<v Speaker 1>in the royal family. That they know people are a

0:02:32.919 --> 0:02:35.760
<v Speaker 1>bit suss about all those houses they've gotten who they

0:02:35.800 --> 0:02:38.320
<v Speaker 1>let stay in them, like their dodgy relatives have some

0:02:38.440 --> 0:02:42.720
<v Speaker 1>dodgy connections. So they have released their tax returns and

0:02:42.960 --> 0:02:45.920
<v Speaker 1>just like mine, King Charles reveals that last year he

0:02:46.000 --> 0:02:50.680
<v Speaker 1>paid twelve point nine million pounds in tax. That is

0:02:50.800 --> 0:02:54.320
<v Speaker 1>nearly twenty five million Aussie dollars. Well, it sounds like

0:02:54.320 --> 0:02:55.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot of money.

0:02:55.120 --> 0:02:58.120
<v Speaker 2>Right, Yeah, seems like he's keeping the economy of flying.

0:02:59.520 --> 0:03:02.360
<v Speaker 1>The thing about all this is, though, is that so

0:03:02.520 --> 0:03:05.400
<v Speaker 1>royals pay tax on their earnings and they earn money

0:03:05.639 --> 0:03:08.640
<v Speaker 1>from basically the land they own. So Charles, most of

0:03:08.720 --> 0:03:11.399
<v Speaker 1>Charles's money comes from something called the Duchy of Lancaster,

0:03:11.440 --> 0:03:14.760
<v Speaker 1>which is like a big parcel of land and businesses

0:03:14.760 --> 0:03:17.400
<v Speaker 1>that are on that land and rents that get paid

0:03:17.440 --> 0:03:19.760
<v Speaker 1>for properties on that land, and so he gets income

0:03:19.760 --> 0:03:21.400
<v Speaker 1>from all that, and that's what he pays tax on.

0:03:21.880 --> 0:03:24.119
<v Speaker 1>But then on the other hand, the royals also get

0:03:24.200 --> 0:03:26.440
<v Speaker 1>given money by the government, so it's like they give

0:03:26.520 --> 0:03:30.120
<v Speaker 1>the governments money and they get money from the government.

0:03:30.160 --> 0:03:31.680
<v Speaker 3>So they're basically welfare queens.

0:03:31.680 --> 0:03:36.160
<v Speaker 1>They basically are. And also the government pays them for

0:03:36.240 --> 0:03:38.160
<v Speaker 1>some of the money that they're then giving back to

0:03:38.200 --> 0:03:40.000
<v Speaker 1>the government, if you see what I mean. So for example,

0:03:40.000 --> 0:03:42.400
<v Speaker 1>there's a big prison on some of the royal land

0:03:42.760 --> 0:03:46.040
<v Speaker 1>and the government pays millions of pounds to rent that

0:03:46.200 --> 0:03:49.480
<v Speaker 1>prison from them, and then Charles pays tax back on it.

0:03:49.520 --> 0:03:50.680
<v Speaker 1>Do you know what I mean? It sounds like some

0:03:50.760 --> 0:03:54.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of boomerash tax scandal. I don't know, but for

0:03:54.600 --> 0:03:57.040
<v Speaker 1>the first time we know exactly how much money they're

0:03:57.080 --> 0:03:57.320
<v Speaker 1>all in.

0:03:57.520 --> 0:04:01.440
<v Speaker 3>I do wonder what he is allow to tax deduct

0:04:01.520 --> 0:04:06.520
<v Speaker 3>with his accountant, Crowns gin what else, Like just think

0:04:06.600 --> 0:04:10.040
<v Speaker 3>synonymous with being King Charles Dilotines.

0:04:11.600 --> 0:04:16.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm interested in why he's getting money from the government.

0:04:16.880 --> 0:04:18.440
<v Speaker 3>That doesn't feel like that good.

0:04:18.600 --> 0:04:21.799
<v Speaker 1>So here's the thing is, their royal family gets money

0:04:21.800 --> 0:04:24.080
<v Speaker 1>from the government to keep things going. So this year

0:04:24.080 --> 0:04:27.720
<v Speaker 1>they're going to get one hundred million pounds to like

0:04:28.000 --> 0:04:31.520
<v Speaker 1>renovate an old palace, sort this out, sort that out,

0:04:31.600 --> 0:04:34.760
<v Speaker 1>keep the royalness of Britain going. So they get money

0:04:34.800 --> 0:04:37.920
<v Speaker 1>from the government, they charge the government for things, and

0:04:37.960 --> 0:04:42.200
<v Speaker 1>they pay back money to the government. So it's a very.

0:04:41.320 --> 0:04:44.720
<v Speaker 2>This is the thing I understand transparency. I think that's lovely.

0:04:45.440 --> 0:04:49.000
<v Speaker 2>I would also like to know more details, like about

0:04:49.040 --> 0:04:52.400
<v Speaker 2>his tax return documents, like like what he is claiming,

0:04:53.200 --> 0:04:57.240
<v Speaker 2>what holidays, counters, work travel, et cetera. I guess he'd

0:04:57.279 --> 0:04:59.760
<v Speaker 2>be able to claim everything, because it's like he's always

0:05:00.640 --> 0:05:02.279
<v Speaker 2>do you know what I mean, Like, you know, Holly,

0:05:02.839 --> 0:05:05.760
<v Speaker 2>if we go on a trip, we could be like

0:05:06.279 --> 0:05:08.960
<v Speaker 2>we went to a book shop and signed a book,

0:05:09.040 --> 0:05:11.159
<v Speaker 2>so therefore we can do I don't do that on

0:05:11.240 --> 0:05:12.640
<v Speaker 2>my tax return, so that's why I can make a

0:05:12.680 --> 0:05:15.760
<v Speaker 2>joke about it, like you could kind of claim it

0:05:15.800 --> 0:05:19.120
<v Speaker 2>as a work thing. But he's he's always king, and.

0:05:19.560 --> 0:05:24.040
<v Speaker 1>He's always speaking all the time, and he famously used

0:05:24.040 --> 0:05:26.080
<v Speaker 1>to have whether or not he still does, we're not sure.

0:05:26.120 --> 0:05:28.280
<v Speaker 1>But when he was Prince Charles and like a bit

0:05:28.320 --> 0:05:30.760
<v Speaker 1>of a young man about town, he used to always

0:05:30.800 --> 0:05:33.360
<v Speaker 1>travel with an equerry who would make his martinis for

0:05:33.480 --> 0:05:36.400
<v Speaker 1>him and carry them around a party, and he also

0:05:36.520 --> 0:05:40.240
<v Speaker 1>always had someone to squeeze the toothpaste onto his toothbrush

0:05:40.320 --> 0:05:41.200
<v Speaker 1>wherever he was.

0:05:41.279 --> 0:05:44.200
<v Speaker 3>That can't be real, so surely it's definitely real.

0:05:44.480 --> 0:05:48.560
<v Speaker 1>So those that would all be taxtadtable Martini guy, toothpaste

0:05:48.640 --> 0:05:51.880
<v Speaker 1>guy carry. There was even in Tina Brown's Palace paper

0:05:51.880 --> 0:05:53.880
<v Speaker 1>books there was talk about sometimes if you'd go to

0:05:53.920 --> 0:05:57.120
<v Speaker 1>a country house, and again I'm sure that things have changed,

0:05:57.240 --> 0:05:59.880
<v Speaker 1>she said generously. He would insist if he was going

0:05:59.880 --> 0:06:02.719
<v Speaker 1>to stay at some fancy person's country house, that a

0:06:02.760 --> 0:06:05.279
<v Speaker 1>bed was brought in for him, his bed, his pictures

0:06:05.279 --> 0:06:09.360
<v Speaker 1>on the wall. So then there's bedroom guy for pillar fluffing.

0:06:09.120 --> 0:06:11.080
<v Speaker 3>Guy, soft toy guy as well.

0:06:11.120 --> 0:06:14.960
<v Speaker 1>Didn't he need to in a particular combos soft toys.

0:06:15.000 --> 0:06:18.279
<v Speaker 1>So there's a lot of people employed to make sure

0:06:18.400 --> 0:06:21.159
<v Speaker 1>that the king and the princes and everybody can feel

0:06:21.200 --> 0:06:23.919
<v Speaker 1>important enough. But this is apparently what William was going

0:06:23.960 --> 0:06:26.000
<v Speaker 1>to unpick. So a lot of people might be out

0:06:26.000 --> 0:06:29.200
<v Speaker 1>of work for not squeezing toothpaste anymore. And I don't know,

0:06:29.279 --> 0:06:30.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm up in arms about that.

0:06:30.400 --> 0:06:31.719
<v Speaker 3>I'd like to see AI do that.

0:06:33.920 --> 0:06:35.839
<v Speaker 2>In a statement at the end of last week, the

0:06:35.920 --> 0:06:39.000
<v Speaker 2>Nine Network announced that Karl Stefanovic, who has hosted the

0:06:39.040 --> 0:06:41.680
<v Speaker 2>Today Show for more than twenty years, would leave his

0:06:41.800 --> 0:06:46.120
<v Speaker 2>role immediately. It followed days of controversy after Karl used

0:06:46.120 --> 0:06:51.320
<v Speaker 2>his independent podcast to interview British far right activist Tommy Robinson,

0:06:51.760 --> 0:06:54.600
<v Speaker 2>best known as a co founder of the English Defense

0:06:54.720 --> 0:06:58.599
<v Speaker 2>League and anti Islam movement established in two thousand and nine.

0:06:59.120 --> 0:07:02.120
<v Speaker 2>Tommy has also been to prison several times and has

0:07:02.160 --> 0:07:05.800
<v Speaker 2>been convicted of several crimes such as assault, mortgage fraud

0:07:05.920 --> 0:07:09.680
<v Speaker 2>and contemptive court a bit of a rap sheet. In

0:07:09.680 --> 0:07:11.760
<v Speaker 2>two thousand and five, he lost his job as an

0:07:11.800 --> 0:07:15.600
<v Speaker 2>apprentice engineer when he was jailed for assaulting an off

0:07:15.640 --> 0:07:20.120
<v Speaker 2>duty police officer. He then started his street activism as

0:07:20.120 --> 0:07:24.000
<v Speaker 2>a member of the fascist British National Party. He styles

0:07:24.040 --> 0:07:27.160
<v Speaker 2>himself as a bit of an independent journalist and that

0:07:27.360 --> 0:07:30.680
<v Speaker 2>is a claim that Stefanovic didn't challenge during their hour

0:07:30.760 --> 0:07:36.120
<v Speaker 2>long interview, despite Robinson's frequent involvement in violent unrest and

0:07:36.160 --> 0:07:42.280
<v Speaker 2>peddling of misinformation online. Robinson has also shared graphic footage

0:07:42.280 --> 0:07:45.320
<v Speaker 2>of a stabbing attack in Belfast allegedly carried out by

0:07:45.320 --> 0:07:49.680
<v Speaker 2>a Sudanese born suspect, and then he promoted rallies which

0:07:49.720 --> 0:07:53.160
<v Speaker 2>devolved into violent attacks on migrants and the burning of homes.

0:07:53.640 --> 0:07:55.960
<v Speaker 2>His content was singled out by police as playing a

0:07:56.000 --> 0:07:59.680
<v Speaker 2>significant role in the radicalization of the terrorist behind the

0:07:59.680 --> 0:08:04.960
<v Speaker 2>twin seventeen Finsbury Park Mosk attack, and generally his content

0:08:05.080 --> 0:08:09.040
<v Speaker 2>is understood to have a lot of hate speech about Muslims.

0:08:09.520 --> 0:08:13.960
<v Speaker 2>He's been denied in Australian visa twice and has a

0:08:14.080 --> 0:08:17.840
<v Speaker 2>very transparent hatred of the media. He's been convicted for

0:08:17.880 --> 0:08:20.800
<v Speaker 2>stalking and threatening a string of journalists in late night

0:08:20.880 --> 0:08:25.920
<v Speaker 2>visits to their homes. So overall not a great guy.

0:08:25.920 --> 0:08:29.080
<v Speaker 2>This is who Karl has his arm around at the

0:08:29.120 --> 0:08:33.320
<v Speaker 2>beginning of the interview and who he conducted the conversation

0:08:33.400 --> 0:08:37.880
<v Speaker 2>with in a very matey tone. Stefanovic also praised Robinson

0:08:37.920 --> 0:08:41.160
<v Speaker 2>for his tenacity and courage and signed off with I

0:08:41.200 --> 0:08:45.040
<v Speaker 2>love you mate. On Thursday, Maya and Holly dropped a

0:08:45.080 --> 0:08:48.839
<v Speaker 2>bonusm Maya Out Loud episode unpacking the news of Karl's

0:08:48.880 --> 0:08:51.600
<v Speaker 2>departure from nine. That was the moment that we knew

0:08:52.080 --> 0:08:56.600
<v Speaker 2>it was official. But since then, he's posted a viral

0:08:56.720 --> 0:09:00.760
<v Speaker 2>farewell message on social media defending his choice of podcast

0:09:00.800 --> 0:09:06.400
<v Speaker 2>interviewees and sounding relieved that he is finally free and

0:09:06.440 --> 0:09:09.160
<v Speaker 2>truly independent. Here's a bit of that message.

0:09:09.960 --> 0:09:12.120
<v Speaker 4>So here's what I believe in the public deserve to

0:09:12.160 --> 0:09:16.800
<v Speaker 4>hear perspectives. This country was built by hard working assies

0:09:16.840 --> 0:09:19.400
<v Speaker 4>from all around the world, and they were bound by

0:09:19.400 --> 0:09:24.080
<v Speaker 4>the same values but very different experiences. So on my show,

0:09:24.960 --> 0:09:27.880
<v Speaker 4>I've spoken to people who have different perspectives. I know

0:09:28.000 --> 0:09:30.640
<v Speaker 4>that why and some people up. Sometimes I agree with

0:09:30.679 --> 0:09:36.280
<v Speaker 4>everything against says, sometimes I don't. But importantly, you get

0:09:36.320 --> 0:09:39.440
<v Speaker 4>to make up your mind. You have the right to

0:09:39.480 --> 0:09:43.920
<v Speaker 4>hear from different voices. Freedom of speech here and around

0:09:43.960 --> 0:09:45.560
<v Speaker 4>the world is what this show is about.

0:09:46.960 --> 0:09:49.679
<v Speaker 3>I just can't wait to be free of my multimillion

0:09:49.720 --> 0:09:52.760
<v Speaker 3>dollar contract. I know, it's all I want in life.

0:09:52.880 --> 0:09:53.080
<v Speaker 4>I know.

0:09:53.160 --> 0:09:58.160
<v Speaker 2>I think he's been very shackled and now he is

0:09:58.240 --> 0:10:01.400
<v Speaker 2>free of being paid that much. Over the weekend, there

0:10:01.400 --> 0:10:05.360
<v Speaker 2>seem to be two camps emerging. There are those who

0:10:05.520 --> 0:10:09.480
<v Speaker 2>now see Karl as a symbol of free speech and

0:10:09.520 --> 0:10:13.360
<v Speaker 2>supporting him is basically saying, yeah, this is ridiculous. We

0:10:13.360 --> 0:10:15.960
<v Speaker 2>can be trusted to make up our own minds. And

0:10:16.080 --> 0:10:19.240
<v Speaker 2>there are those who are cynical about this well trodden

0:10:19.400 --> 0:10:24.000
<v Speaker 2>strategy of leaning into controversy and then building independent media

0:10:24.040 --> 0:10:27.800
<v Speaker 2>on the back of it. Holly, does this feel reminiscent

0:10:28.280 --> 0:10:31.040
<v Speaker 2>of some other big names in media.

0:10:32.040 --> 0:10:36.000
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely, this is a it's become over the last few years,

0:10:36.000 --> 0:10:38.920
<v Speaker 1>a really well trodden path for particularly in America and

0:10:39.000 --> 0:10:45.480
<v Speaker 1>the UK, for mainstream media people. So Piers Morgan is

0:10:45.480 --> 0:10:48.240
<v Speaker 1>a good example right in the UK. So Piers Morgan

0:10:48.559 --> 0:10:53.480
<v Speaker 1>former newspaper editor, and he prides himself on grilling people,

0:10:53.520 --> 0:10:55.640
<v Speaker 1>which is not something that Karl is doing. Has to

0:10:55.679 --> 0:10:58.240
<v Speaker 1>be said on his podcast, at least not at the moment.

0:10:58.280 --> 0:11:01.440
<v Speaker 1>Maybe he will do more of that. But Piers Morgan

0:11:01.640 --> 0:11:06.559
<v Speaker 1>was a very mainstream media figure and controversial in a way.

0:11:07.160 --> 0:11:11.280
<v Speaker 1>But he famously left TV in Britain in a huff

0:11:11.320 --> 0:11:14.240
<v Speaker 1>after he had a fight on air with a colleague

0:11:14.240 --> 0:11:17.240
<v Speaker 1>about Megan Markle. His views about Megan Markle a kind

0:11:17.240 --> 0:11:19.720
<v Speaker 1>of be on the pale. But anyway, he huffed off

0:11:19.800 --> 0:11:21.560
<v Speaker 1>and he went to work for Murdoch for a while,

0:11:21.679 --> 0:11:25.600
<v Speaker 1>making a sort of TV talk show on YouTube for Murdoch.

0:11:25.960 --> 0:11:29.200
<v Speaker 1>But now he has set up his own media company

0:11:29.240 --> 0:11:32.240
<v Speaker 1>and it's called, of course Uncensored because he's not no

0:11:32.280 --> 0:11:34.800
<v Speaker 1>longer censored. He can say what he wants, and he's

0:11:34.800 --> 0:11:38.000
<v Speaker 1>built it from one show to three. So there's there's

0:11:38.000 --> 0:11:40.840
<v Speaker 1>a history, there's his main show, his opinion show, there's

0:11:40.880 --> 0:11:43.000
<v Speaker 1>a history show now, there's a royal show now, and

0:11:43.040 --> 0:11:46.000
<v Speaker 1>you can expect that to probably grow. In the US.

0:11:46.520 --> 0:11:50.880
<v Speaker 1>Tucker Carlson did this, Megan Kelly did this. Less well

0:11:50.920 --> 0:11:53.200
<v Speaker 1>known media names have also done it, where they've said,

0:11:53.240 --> 0:11:54.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to work for the New York Times anymore,

0:11:54.960 --> 0:11:57.920
<v Speaker 1>Barry Weiss, I don't want to work for whatever because

0:11:58.000 --> 0:11:59.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm censored in what I can say. I'm going to

0:11:59.960 --> 0:12:02.440
<v Speaker 1>go off and build my own. Louis c K, Yes,

0:12:02.559 --> 0:12:05.640
<v Speaker 1>Louis c K. Even Russell Brand, you could argue, you know,

0:12:05.679 --> 0:12:08.040
<v Speaker 1>has definitely done this. So we live in a very

0:12:08.040 --> 0:12:11.160
<v Speaker 1>different media landscape than the one that the likes of

0:12:11.360 --> 0:12:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Carl came up in, and some of us are obviously

0:12:14.600 --> 0:12:16.600
<v Speaker 1>a bit more aware of that than others, because some

0:12:16.640 --> 0:12:20.840
<v Speaker 1>people saw the firing and inverted commas of Carl and

0:12:20.880 --> 0:12:22.920
<v Speaker 1>we're kind of like, oh, no, he's been fired. But

0:12:23.880 --> 0:12:27.840
<v Speaker 1>it's quite apparent that Carl wanted this. There is no

0:12:28.320 --> 0:12:30.840
<v Speaker 1>it was untenable for him to keep doing what he

0:12:30.920 --> 0:12:33.640
<v Speaker 1>was doing over here on his own independent podcast and

0:12:33.720 --> 0:12:37.000
<v Speaker 1>still be smiling and interviewing the Prime Minister on Today Show,

0:12:37.559 --> 0:12:39.440
<v Speaker 1>sitting next to Serah. But every day that was just

0:12:39.480 --> 0:12:43.480
<v Speaker 1>becoming untenable. The Tommy Robinson decision, it needs to be

0:12:43.559 --> 0:12:47.240
<v Speaker 1>clear that has that's considered beyond the pale in Britain,

0:12:47.320 --> 0:12:50.200
<v Speaker 1>it's considered beyond the pale everywhere. You know, the far

0:12:50.360 --> 0:12:54.319
<v Speaker 1>right Party of Britain, Reform UK, they will have nothing

0:12:54.360 --> 0:12:56.680
<v Speaker 1>to do with Tommy Robinson, like he is a really

0:12:56.760 --> 0:13:02.600
<v Speaker 1>out there marginalized figure. So making that particular decision was

0:13:02.800 --> 0:13:05.760
<v Speaker 1>very red ragtable in terms of I don't know how

0:13:05.920 --> 0:13:08.959
<v Speaker 1>you can you can expect to keep a mainstream job

0:13:09.000 --> 0:13:11.400
<v Speaker 1>if you've done that, particularly in the way that he's

0:13:11.440 --> 0:13:15.479
<v Speaker 1>done it, which is not a grilling, not a prosecution

0:13:15.559 --> 0:13:19.520
<v Speaker 1>of ideas, but a mate sit down. And particularly that

0:13:19.600 --> 0:13:22.120
<v Speaker 1>social video I think was one of the things that

0:13:22.240 --> 0:13:26.240
<v Speaker 1>really really made that clear that he was It just

0:13:26.360 --> 0:13:29.040
<v Speaker 1>wasn't possible for nine any more to keep him on staff.

0:13:29.160 --> 0:13:32.360
<v Speaker 2>And I think that detail about Tommy Robinson is really

0:13:32.400 --> 0:13:37.560
<v Speaker 2>important because when I first saw we talked about it

0:13:37.760 --> 0:13:40.440
<v Speaker 2>Holly before we talked about it on the show, about

0:13:40.480 --> 0:13:44.400
<v Speaker 2>what it looked like he might lose his job, and

0:13:45.360 --> 0:13:47.760
<v Speaker 2>I think a lot of us had never heard that

0:13:47.880 --> 0:13:50.240
<v Speaker 2>name before Tommy Robinson. And you think, well, there are

0:13:50.240 --> 0:13:53.040
<v Speaker 2>a lot of provocative people online who say all sorts

0:13:53.080 --> 0:13:57.400
<v Speaker 2>of things, and just because you interview somebody doesn't mean

0:13:57.400 --> 0:14:00.840
<v Speaker 2>you endorse everything. There there's that argument that a lot

0:14:00.840 --> 0:14:07.439
<v Speaker 2>of people are leaning into. But this particular person having

0:14:07.640 --> 0:14:12.200
<v Speaker 2>him on your show and not having a critical eye

0:14:12.320 --> 0:14:16.240
<v Speaker 2>at all, I think you're exactly right. It was orchestrated

0:14:17.000 --> 0:14:20.320
<v Speaker 2>that you can't do that and then go sit.

0:14:20.640 --> 0:14:22.440
<v Speaker 1>On the Today So to beic clear, and I mean,

0:14:22.520 --> 0:14:24.680
<v Speaker 1>as you said, Mia and I had a conversation about

0:14:24.680 --> 0:14:26.520
<v Speaker 1>this on Thursday, and I urge everyone to go listen

0:14:26.520 --> 0:14:29.200
<v Speaker 1>to it because Mia obviously has some really interesting insights

0:14:29.200 --> 0:14:31.240
<v Speaker 1>into this. She not only owns a media company, co

0:14:31.320 --> 0:14:34.160
<v Speaker 1>owns a media company, but she used to work with Carl,

0:14:34.200 --> 0:14:35.640
<v Speaker 1>worked at the Today Show and all these things, so

0:14:35.680 --> 0:14:40.400
<v Speaker 1>she has really really good knowledge about this. But it's true,

0:14:40.440 --> 0:14:45.120
<v Speaker 1>of course that you know, particularly an independent media world,

0:14:45.160 --> 0:14:47.880
<v Speaker 1>you can sit down with whoever you want. Platforming doesn't

0:14:47.880 --> 0:14:51.960
<v Speaker 1>always mean endorsement. But there is a very specific pattern

0:14:52.040 --> 0:14:54.280
<v Speaker 1>in the way that Carl has decided to go with

0:14:54.280 --> 0:14:56.920
<v Speaker 1>his guests on his show, which is in one very

0:14:57.040 --> 0:15:01.640
<v Speaker 1>strong political direction. He has thrown his hat literally because

0:15:01.640 --> 0:15:03.080
<v Speaker 1>he wears a big hat in all the answer for

0:15:03.120 --> 0:15:05.680
<v Speaker 1>his show. He's thrown his hat in that ring. It's

0:15:05.720 --> 0:15:09.040
<v Speaker 1>a little disingenuous to be saying, oh, I want to

0:15:09.080 --> 0:15:12.240
<v Speaker 1>hear all different perspectives when it seems that actually most

0:15:12.240 --> 0:15:16.160
<v Speaker 1>of the guests that you're having all have one same perspective.

0:15:16.360 --> 0:15:19.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and also you don't hear Sarah Ferguson or Lee

0:15:19.720 --> 0:15:23.480
<v Speaker 3>sales and interviews with controversial figures with the sign off

0:15:23.520 --> 0:15:26.400
<v Speaker 3>of love you mate. Like, that's just not what serious

0:15:26.520 --> 0:15:31.000
<v Speaker 3>journalists do when they're interviewing someone, especially someone controversial. To me,

0:15:31.240 --> 0:15:36.120
<v Speaker 3>I just the cynicism of this is just gobsmacking. I

0:15:36.240 --> 0:15:38.080
<v Speaker 3>went to the source. I didn't want to watch the

0:15:38.120 --> 0:15:41.880
<v Speaker 3>Tommy Robinson interview because life is too short. I watched

0:15:41.920 --> 0:15:46.680
<v Speaker 3>the Holly Valance interview. Now, Holly Valance had a hit

0:15:46.800 --> 0:15:50.360
<v Speaker 3>single back in the early two thousands called Kiss Kiss,

0:15:50.720 --> 0:15:53.280
<v Speaker 3>which had a very risky music video, and she has

0:15:53.360 --> 0:15:57.520
<v Speaker 3>now turned into I think she would describe herself this

0:15:57.600 --> 0:16:01.960
<v Speaker 3>way as an advocate for right wing slash conservative causes

0:16:02.000 --> 0:16:05.160
<v Speaker 3>in the UK. She was married to a billionaire called

0:16:05.240 --> 0:16:08.200
<v Speaker 3>Nick Candy, a property developer for a time. They are

0:16:08.200 --> 0:16:13.120
<v Speaker 3>now divorced, and she says to Karl that she is

0:16:13.240 --> 0:16:16.680
<v Speaker 3>now a stay at home by occupation, but like I said,

0:16:16.680 --> 0:16:19.480
<v Speaker 3>she's also involved in politics. So I wanted to see

0:16:19.560 --> 0:16:22.680
<v Speaker 3>how he conducts one of these interviews on his podcast.

0:16:22.720 --> 0:16:25.680
<v Speaker 3>And I should say that, like most Australians, I used

0:16:25.680 --> 0:16:28.400
<v Speaker 3>to find Kyl so charming, Like he is just a

0:16:28.520 --> 0:16:32.040
<v Speaker 3>very charming, charismatic individual and that's why he's been so

0:16:32.040 --> 0:16:36.120
<v Speaker 3>successful in media. And he's a great interviewer too. But

0:16:36.240 --> 0:16:39.080
<v Speaker 3>what became a parent watching this interview with Holly Valance

0:16:39.360 --> 0:16:44.520
<v Speaker 3>is that all he wanted from Holly was controversial soundbites

0:16:44.680 --> 0:16:48.800
<v Speaker 3>that would catapult him into the headlines. And to Holly's credit,

0:16:49.240 --> 0:16:52.200
<v Speaker 3>Holly was not in the business of promoting Carl. She

0:16:52.360 --> 0:16:54.640
<v Speaker 3>wanted to talk about what she wanted to talk about,

0:16:55.000 --> 0:16:57.360
<v Speaker 3>and she didn't want to be goaded into saying things

0:16:57.400 --> 0:17:00.440
<v Speaker 3>that may or may not represent what she actually thinks

0:17:00.480 --> 0:17:02.520
<v Speaker 3>just so that he can get more famous. So at

0:17:02.600 --> 0:17:04.919
<v Speaker 3>various points in the interview, he keeps saying to her

0:17:04.960 --> 0:17:07.119
<v Speaker 3>she's spoken out in the past about how she thinks

0:17:07.160 --> 0:17:10.879
<v Speaker 3>that immigration numbers are too high in the UK. He

0:17:11.040 --> 0:17:13.400
<v Speaker 3>kept pushing on that because he wanted her to say

0:17:13.440 --> 0:17:15.920
<v Speaker 3>something that would get headlines, and she wouldn't do it

0:17:16.640 --> 0:17:19.680
<v Speaker 3>because even she someone who was sympathetic to the point

0:17:19.680 --> 0:17:22.000
<v Speaker 3>of view that he's putting forward, even she could see

0:17:22.200 --> 0:17:24.280
<v Speaker 3>that this is just the Carl Show. This is him

0:17:24.320 --> 0:17:26.800
<v Speaker 3>just trying to get controversy and upset people for the

0:17:26.840 --> 0:17:27.720
<v Speaker 3>sake of his own brand.

0:17:27.760 --> 0:17:30.560
<v Speaker 1>To be clear, Holly Valance has also been done to

0:17:30.600 --> 0:17:34.080
<v Speaker 1>hang out with Tommy Robinson. Like I think again, the

0:17:34.119 --> 0:17:37.120
<v Speaker 1>pattern of the guests he's choosing is very sure.

0:17:37.320 --> 0:17:40.360
<v Speaker 2>But I think you're right, Amelia. He's going for this

0:17:41.200 --> 0:17:47.520
<v Speaker 2>rage babyge. He's trying to jump on the hate train

0:17:48.160 --> 0:17:53.199
<v Speaker 2>to get views and monetize what he's doing, and so

0:17:53.320 --> 0:17:58.400
<v Speaker 2>the idea that he's therefore been persecuted seems absurd. There's

0:17:58.680 --> 0:18:01.840
<v Speaker 2>an Australian actor and director called Damon Gamo and he

0:18:02.000 --> 0:18:06.600
<v Speaker 2>shared he basically shared the playbook on Instagram, which I

0:18:06.600 --> 0:18:09.760
<v Speaker 2>found really interesting. He said, Carl's just deployed a tactic

0:18:09.760 --> 0:18:13.240
<v Speaker 2>that is sometimes called the martyrdom or persecution strategy. It's

0:18:13.280 --> 0:18:15.560
<v Speaker 2>been used by figures on both the left and right

0:18:15.720 --> 0:18:18.159
<v Speaker 2>of politics, which I really agree with. You see it

0:18:18.440 --> 0:18:20.880
<v Speaker 2>you see it on both sides, he wrote. Step one,

0:18:21.000 --> 0:18:24.960
<v Speaker 2>deliberately violate a social norm by interviewing a controversial figure,

0:18:25.000 --> 0:18:30.000
<v Speaker 2>for example. Step two, generate public backlash. Critics condemn ideally

0:18:30.000 --> 0:18:35.159
<v Speaker 2>an employer pushes back. Step three, reframe the backlash as persecution.

0:18:35.520 --> 0:18:39.280
<v Speaker 2>You post on socials, you tag Elon, You thank him

0:18:39.280 --> 0:18:42.440
<v Speaker 2>for being a bastion of free speech. Step four strengthen

0:18:42.480 --> 0:18:45.920
<v Speaker 2>group identity and grow your audience, and then position yourself

0:18:45.960 --> 0:18:50.320
<v Speaker 2>as someone who tells uncomfortable truths and you encourage subscriptions

0:18:50.480 --> 0:18:55.360
<v Speaker 2>hunt to whatever you're doing. This is exactly what he's done,

0:18:55.480 --> 0:18:59.280
<v Speaker 2>and I find it Carl in that video where he's

0:18:59.320 --> 0:19:04.199
<v Speaker 2>talking about finally being free, he really is appealing to

0:19:04.440 --> 0:19:08.920
<v Speaker 2>the ego of the people who are on his side, saying,

0:19:09.480 --> 0:19:12.239
<v Speaker 2>you're smart enough to make up your own mind. You

0:19:12.240 --> 0:19:16.480
<v Speaker 2>don't have to listen to it. He's kind of there

0:19:16.480 --> 0:19:19.040
<v Speaker 2>are people who are like, yeah, yeah, I am I

0:19:19.080 --> 0:19:22.960
<v Speaker 2>am smart. I can listen to this and decide whether

0:19:23.080 --> 0:19:26.960
<v Speaker 2>or not it's for me. And I think there is

0:19:27.160 --> 0:19:30.600
<v Speaker 2>also an important point to be made about when people

0:19:30.680 --> 0:19:36.520
<v Speaker 2>go independent, the danger of that. So when you are

0:19:37.000 --> 0:19:39.440
<v Speaker 2>hosting the Today Show, you're working for the nine network,

0:19:39.680 --> 0:19:42.359
<v Speaker 2>and there are all sorts of problems with mainstream media

0:19:42.400 --> 0:19:45.600
<v Speaker 2>as well that you can have agendas all of that,

0:19:46.280 --> 0:19:49.600
<v Speaker 2>but when you go fully on your own, you have

0:19:49.880 --> 0:19:54.400
<v Speaker 2>no one to hold you to account to maybe ask questions, you.

0:19:54.400 --> 0:19:54.840
<v Speaker 3>Have no.

0:19:57.240 --> 0:20:01.960
<v Speaker 2>Very very senior producer, maybe say hey, so this is

0:20:02.000 --> 0:20:08.200
<v Speaker 2>the reason people don't interview Tommy Robinson. You don't have

0:20:09.359 --> 0:20:15.200
<v Speaker 2>the kind of journalistic code of ethics or the journalistic standards.

0:20:15.200 --> 0:20:19.520
<v Speaker 2>So in Australia, if ma'm Maya does something wrong, if

0:20:20.000 --> 0:20:22.840
<v Speaker 2>Sidney Morning Herald does something wrong, you can right to

0:20:23.000 --> 0:20:29.920
<v Speaker 2>like like Journalistic Standards Board and file a complaint. If

0:20:30.520 --> 0:20:35.119
<v Speaker 2>an independent journalist does that, there's no kind of mode

0:20:35.200 --> 0:20:38.360
<v Speaker 2>to challenge it because they're just doing their own thing.

0:20:38.520 --> 0:20:41.680
<v Speaker 1>The thing that's tricky because it's absolutely right that by

0:20:41.800 --> 0:20:45.200
<v Speaker 1>nine letting go, letting Carl go, they've created something of

0:20:45.240 --> 0:20:47.520
<v Speaker 1>a martist storyline for him, no question, and you know

0:20:47.560 --> 0:20:49.480
<v Speaker 1>there have been other examples of this, you know, but

0:20:49.560 --> 0:20:53.600
<v Speaker 1>the sort of letting someone go and then that becoming

0:20:53.640 --> 0:20:55.960
<v Speaker 1>part of their narrative that allows them to rise to

0:20:56.040 --> 0:21:00.280
<v Speaker 1>a certain level is tricky because the alternative is also

0:21:00.320 --> 0:21:02.119
<v Speaker 1>really hard. I was talking to me about this on

0:21:02.160 --> 0:21:04.080
<v Speaker 1>Thursdays at where I said, why couldn't Nine in a

0:21:04.080 --> 0:21:07.240
<v Speaker 1>way just hold their nerve because Carl was on a

0:21:07.280 --> 0:21:10.240
<v Speaker 1>one year extension on his contract. So in theory you

0:21:10.280 --> 0:21:13.440
<v Speaker 1>could like hold your breath till December and maybe until

0:21:13.480 --> 0:21:19.040
<v Speaker 1>the Tommy Robinson red flag, as I say, happened they

0:21:19.040 --> 0:21:21.200
<v Speaker 1>were there would have been lots of talks. There had

0:21:21.240 --> 0:21:24.840
<v Speaker 1>been a campaign had started from mad fucking Witches, who

0:21:24.840 --> 0:21:29.800
<v Speaker 1>are a pressure group who get together and pressure advertisers

0:21:29.800 --> 0:21:32.440
<v Speaker 1>on networks. This has been part of Kyle Sandaland's story

0:21:32.480 --> 0:21:34.840
<v Speaker 1>for a really long time, saying why are you employing

0:21:34.880 --> 0:21:37.400
<v Speaker 1>this person? Why are you advertising on this show? Right?

0:21:38.040 --> 0:21:40.840
<v Speaker 1>And so in a way you think when I saw

0:21:40.840 --> 0:21:43.320
<v Speaker 1>that Nine were going to fire in inverted commas Karl.

0:21:43.560 --> 0:21:46.600
<v Speaker 1>Although they've made it clear both sides that they're not calling.

0:21:46.320 --> 0:21:49.480
<v Speaker 2>It that, No, they're making it sound like in a

0:21:49.560 --> 0:21:50.920
<v Speaker 2>mutual agreement.

0:21:50.560 --> 0:21:52.840
<v Speaker 1>There was a bit of me, as someone who's resistant

0:21:52.840 --> 0:21:55.880
<v Speaker 1>to that Mader narrative, that's like, oh, you've just made it.

0:21:56.040 --> 0:21:59.240
<v Speaker 1>You've just given him more credibility and standing in doing that,

0:21:59.680 --> 0:22:02.760
<v Speaker 1>written this free speech script. But in truth, there didn't

0:22:02.800 --> 0:22:06.000
<v Speaker 1>really have much option because it's such an outrageous thing

0:22:06.080 --> 0:22:09.520
<v Speaker 1>to do. To be seen walking down the street with

0:22:09.560 --> 0:22:11.400
<v Speaker 1>your arm around a guy who isn't even allowed into

0:22:11.440 --> 0:22:14.439
<v Speaker 1>Australia because his views are considered so extremely dangerous and

0:22:14.520 --> 0:22:18.760
<v Speaker 1>violent that the pressure that was going to come to

0:22:18.840 --> 0:22:20.800
<v Speaker 1>nine as a result of that was probably going to

0:22:20.800 --> 0:22:23.600
<v Speaker 1>be too damaging. And that was the same story with

0:22:24.440 --> 0:22:26.760
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Sanderalance for a very long time. You know, is

0:22:26.800 --> 0:22:30.919
<v Speaker 1>that networks allowed him to be on the network despite

0:22:30.920 --> 0:22:32.879
<v Speaker 1>complaints because he brought in a lot of money, and

0:22:32.960 --> 0:22:34.280
<v Speaker 1>he made a lot of money, and he brought a

0:22:34.280 --> 0:22:37.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of listeners. But where there's a tipping point, when

0:22:37.240 --> 0:22:41.160
<v Speaker 1>the cash cow becomes a bit of a liability, that's

0:22:41.200 --> 0:22:43.679
<v Speaker 1>when they have to act. So, in a way, I

0:22:43.680 --> 0:22:47.359
<v Speaker 1>think a bit of new media literacy, Carl will be fine,

0:22:47.680 --> 0:22:50.920
<v Speaker 1>probably because he's got this free speech narrative. He could

0:22:50.960 --> 0:22:53.720
<v Speaker 1>now choose to build a subscriber based model for his

0:22:53.880 --> 0:22:58.199
<v Speaker 1>media empire that will be lucrative. Or advertisers who are

0:22:58.240 --> 0:23:00.639
<v Speaker 1>not spooked by his choice of guests will follow him

0:23:00.640 --> 0:23:04.159
<v Speaker 1>because they know his ability to attract attention is enormous

0:23:04.160 --> 0:23:05.439
<v Speaker 1>and we talk about it all the time. We live

0:23:05.480 --> 0:23:06.560
<v Speaker 1>in an attention economy.

0:23:06.840 --> 0:23:09.760
<v Speaker 3>Or Allah Barry Weiss, he may have some very wealthy

0:23:09.800 --> 0:23:12.760
<v Speaker 3>patrons who are subsidizing his career move.

0:23:12.720 --> 0:23:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Yep, and that's one thing that Mead talked about on Thursday,

0:23:15.080 --> 0:23:17.959
<v Speaker 1>thinking that something has shifted in that corner for Karl lately.

0:23:18.680 --> 0:23:21.280
<v Speaker 1>Read into that to what you will, But either way,

0:23:21.760 --> 0:23:24.760
<v Speaker 1>he now has the freedom to build an empire off

0:23:24.760 --> 0:23:26.919
<v Speaker 1>network if you like, and to be honest in the

0:23:26.960 --> 0:23:31.160
<v Speaker 1>media landscape of twenty twenty six. That's a great place

0:23:31.160 --> 0:23:33.000
<v Speaker 1>for him to be. Whether or not it's a great

0:23:33.040 --> 0:23:37.320
<v Speaker 1>place for politics to be, etc. Is a question depending

0:23:37.359 --> 0:23:40.719
<v Speaker 1>on your views, but he has definitely this has probably

0:23:40.760 --> 0:23:43.320
<v Speaker 1>been a net positive for him. We'll put links in

0:23:43.359 --> 0:23:45.480
<v Speaker 1>the show notes to the episode that we did with

0:23:45.560 --> 0:23:49.800
<v Speaker 1>Mia last Thursday, the column I wrote about this on Friday,

0:23:50.000 --> 0:23:54.199
<v Speaker 1>and also to the No Filter episode that Caitlinbrook did

0:23:54.240 --> 0:23:56.840
<v Speaker 1>with Jessica Row That's Live Today, where she talks about

0:23:56.840 --> 0:24:00.520
<v Speaker 1>her relationship with Karl and that time he had toologize

0:24:00.560 --> 0:24:04.320
<v Speaker 1>her to her for quite an infamous incident. All those

0:24:04.320 --> 0:24:06.080
<v Speaker 1>links will be in the shadouts.

0:24:05.960 --> 0:24:10.680
<v Speaker 3>After the break. All the actual verified details about Taylor

0:24:10.720 --> 0:24:15.159
<v Speaker 3>Swift's weating this weekend. This is the week after months

0:24:15.160 --> 0:24:19.040
<v Speaker 3>of speculation, the New York Times has confirmed what we

0:24:19.160 --> 0:24:21.080
<v Speaker 3>talked about on this show last week, which is that

0:24:21.160 --> 0:24:25.520
<v Speaker 3>Taylor Swift is walking down the aisle this weekend, and

0:24:25.600 --> 0:24:28.000
<v Speaker 3>she is doing it just as we talked about last

0:24:28.000 --> 0:24:32.000
<v Speaker 3>week again at the Madison Square Garden arena in yours?

0:24:32.000 --> 0:24:33.520
<v Speaker 1>Are you putting all your chips on that?

0:24:34.520 --> 0:24:40.760
<v Speaker 3>The New York Times confirmed that Taylor Swift had booked

0:24:40.800 --> 0:24:44.840
<v Speaker 3>Madison Square Garden for Friday and Saturday night, and the

0:24:44.880 --> 0:24:47.639
<v Speaker 3>city leaked to The New York Times that they have

0:24:47.760 --> 0:24:50.240
<v Speaker 3>asked for the streets around the garden to be closed.

0:24:50.520 --> 0:24:53.280
<v Speaker 3>Final piece of evidence is that various players on the

0:24:53.359 --> 0:24:56.399
<v Speaker 3>Kansas City Chiefs, which is Travis Kelsey's football team, have

0:24:56.520 --> 0:25:00.680
<v Speaker 3>booked hotel rooms around the Madison Square Garden complex. What's happening?

0:25:00.840 --> 0:25:02.960
<v Speaker 1>You are not going to be able to escape this

0:25:03.040 --> 0:25:05.800
<v Speaker 1>wedding this weekend, even if we don't see a single

0:25:05.840 --> 0:25:06.480
<v Speaker 1>picture from it.

0:25:06.640 --> 0:25:09.280
<v Speaker 2>No, do you think, No, We're just gonna get We're

0:25:09.320 --> 0:25:12.000
<v Speaker 2>just gonna get all the gossip. I mean, I've heard.

0:25:12.880 --> 0:25:16.640
<v Speaker 2>One little tid bit I've heard is that Taylor got

0:25:16.680 --> 0:25:20.400
<v Speaker 2>the idea of Madison Square Garden from when she went

0:25:20.720 --> 0:25:24.520
<v Speaker 2>to I believe it was Selena Gomez's wedding and she

0:25:24.760 --> 0:25:27.000
<v Speaker 2>realized that that was going to be the only way,

0:25:27.119 --> 0:25:29.359
<v Speaker 2>like having it enclosed is the only way.

0:25:29.200 --> 0:25:32.479
<v Speaker 3>Because Selena's wedding was disrupted by drones. So let me

0:25:32.520 --> 0:25:34.240
<v Speaker 3>explain to you what the source has told The Times

0:25:34.240 --> 0:25:36.840
<v Speaker 3>about exactly how this is going to go down. Friday night.

0:25:36.880 --> 0:25:38.960
<v Speaker 3>We're going to have an intimate gathering of around one

0:25:39.000 --> 0:25:42.440
<v Speaker 3>hundred people, which if anyone has gotten married and done

0:25:42.480 --> 0:25:45.520
<v Speaker 3>a guest list before, Holly, I know you don't understand this.

0:25:46.040 --> 0:25:48.440
<v Speaker 3>It's hard to keep to one hundred, like that's kind

0:25:48.440 --> 0:25:50.920
<v Speaker 3>of the magic number that pretty much everyone always says

0:25:50.960 --> 0:25:52.520
<v Speaker 3>they want, and it's really hard.

0:25:52.760 --> 0:25:55.600
<v Speaker 2>And especially like she's invited Graham Norton, do you know

0:25:55.640 --> 0:25:58.720
<v Speaker 2>what I mean? She invited him, so he's not coming.

0:25:58.760 --> 0:26:00.639
<v Speaker 2>He's definitely not coming to that one. But I just know,

0:26:01.320 --> 0:26:03.080
<v Speaker 2>I just think she's been a little bit liberal.

0:26:03.160 --> 0:26:05.840
<v Speaker 3>She has cast away now because I needed a stadium.

0:26:06.600 --> 0:26:09.520
<v Speaker 3>On Saturday, there's a bigger celebration of around a thousand

0:26:09.520 --> 0:26:12.360
<v Speaker 3>people also at the Garden, and that's possibly a concert.

0:26:13.640 --> 0:26:15.560
<v Speaker 3>Some people think, by the way, that neither of these

0:26:15.640 --> 0:26:18.600
<v Speaker 3>is actually like the wedding, Like there's a quite credible

0:26:18.680 --> 0:26:21.679
<v Speaker 3>rumor that they are already they've already exchanged their vowels

0:26:21.680 --> 0:26:24.880
<v Speaker 3>and that both of these are kind of celebrations. I'll

0:26:24.880 --> 0:26:28.320
<v Speaker 3>tell you some other rumors. Stevie Nix and Tim McGraw,

0:26:28.440 --> 0:26:31.320
<v Speaker 3>who was famously the subject of her first ever single,

0:26:31.760 --> 0:26:36.120
<v Speaker 3>rumor to be performing on Saturday night. Stella McCartney has

0:26:36.119 --> 0:26:40.240
<v Speaker 3>designed the wedding dress. As we know, Stella designed Meghan

0:26:40.800 --> 0:26:44.080
<v Speaker 3>Duchess of Sussex's after party dress.

0:26:43.680 --> 0:26:45.720
<v Speaker 2>Iconic the whole to neck YEP loved it.

0:26:46.520 --> 0:26:51.040
<v Speaker 3>Kenny Chesney, the Country Star and Kesher have canceled their

0:26:51.080 --> 0:26:54.119
<v Speaker 3>tour dates for exactly this weekend, so they're thought to

0:26:54.119 --> 0:26:58.080
<v Speaker 3>be attending Kasher of TikTok Fang and that the company

0:26:58.560 --> 0:27:01.800
<v Speaker 3>tasked with doing the garden for this are going to

0:27:01.800 --> 0:27:05.080
<v Speaker 3>be engineering it into a rose garden because that ties

0:27:05.119 --> 0:27:09.400
<v Speaker 3>in with the engagement photos. There's also a song on

0:27:09.760 --> 0:27:13.040
<v Speaker 3>the album read called The Lucky One, with a lyric

0:27:13.280 --> 0:27:17.400
<v Speaker 3>that says, choose the rose garden of a Madison Square.

0:27:17.520 --> 0:27:18.679
<v Speaker 1>She didn't have to choose.

0:27:18.840 --> 0:27:19.760
<v Speaker 3>She could have both.

0:27:19.920 --> 0:27:23.240
<v Speaker 2>She could have both because correctly.

0:27:22.960 --> 0:27:25.080
<v Speaker 1>If I'm wrong, not that I've been reading about this

0:27:25.200 --> 0:27:29.520
<v Speaker 1>at all, there's no natural light in Marthon now, so

0:27:29.560 --> 0:27:32.400
<v Speaker 1>she has to create all that. Yeah, and I've read

0:27:32.440 --> 0:27:34.639
<v Speaker 1>reports about this firm that she may or may not

0:27:34.680 --> 0:27:37.280
<v Speaker 1>have employed to do that. Who can basically create you

0:27:37.840 --> 0:27:42.200
<v Speaker 1>a natural light seeming dome enclosure whatever you want anywhere

0:27:42.200 --> 0:27:44.119
<v Speaker 1>in the world, like in your basement or whatever.

0:27:44.560 --> 0:27:47.479
<v Speaker 3>So I used it for my son's birthday party this weekend.

0:27:47.640 --> 0:27:50.280
<v Speaker 1>It's not sounding cheap. Sounding cheap, I don't think so.

0:27:50.600 --> 0:27:53.240
<v Speaker 1>I want to know what we think ethically. Not that

0:27:53.280 --> 0:27:57.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking for, you know, validation here, but I've seen

0:27:57.119 --> 0:28:00.440
<v Speaker 1>some commentary that's like, let them just have their wedding, right,

0:28:00.720 --> 0:28:02.639
<v Speaker 1>like this is true love and they just want to

0:28:02.680 --> 0:28:04.760
<v Speaker 1>do this. I have a bit of a if you're

0:28:04.760 --> 0:28:07.440
<v Speaker 1>going to have a huge concert Madamson Square Garden for

0:28:07.480 --> 0:28:09.680
<v Speaker 1>your wedding, I want to share. You've got to share

0:28:09.720 --> 0:28:13.000
<v Speaker 1>that shit. How I need to see Stevie Nicks singing

0:28:13.440 --> 0:28:13.840
<v Speaker 1>some wedding.

0:28:14.119 --> 0:28:16.680
<v Speaker 3>I think both Taylor and Travis have what we call

0:28:16.960 --> 0:28:21.600
<v Speaker 3>main character energy. And I think you choose Madison Square Garden. Yes,

0:28:21.640 --> 0:28:24.399
<v Speaker 3>so you can control the photos, but also so that

0:28:24.440 --> 0:28:25.960
<v Speaker 3>you can give us the photos.

0:28:26.200 --> 0:28:29.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so you think we will because she has a

0:28:29.080 --> 0:28:32.040
<v Speaker 1>very tight relationship with us swifty fans. Obviously, you think

0:28:32.080 --> 0:28:34.600
<v Speaker 1>we will be seeing the inside of this event.

0:28:34.760 --> 0:28:37.359
<v Speaker 3>There is no way we're not seeingide of this event.

0:28:37.560 --> 0:28:40.280
<v Speaker 2>No, great, I agree, I think we're getting stuff. I

0:28:40.440 --> 0:28:43.960
<v Speaker 2>will say, from the perspective of a wedding guest, I've

0:28:44.000 --> 0:28:47.680
<v Speaker 2>got some feedback. I don't want a concert. I don't

0:28:47.680 --> 0:28:51.440
<v Speaker 2>want to I go see Tim McGraw, I don't I

0:28:51.440 --> 0:28:53.320
<v Speaker 2>If I'm at Taylor Swith's wedding and I'm one of

0:28:53.320 --> 0:28:57.360
<v Speaker 2>a thousand guests, I need to be mingling. I need

0:28:57.400 --> 0:28:59.960
<v Speaker 2>to be chatting. And you're going to make me stare

0:29:00.080 --> 0:29:02.720
<v Speaker 2>in there and listen to live music, which is great.

0:29:02.800 --> 0:29:05.960
<v Speaker 2>You're passionate about that, but I don't know. It feels

0:29:06.120 --> 0:29:07.520
<v Speaker 2>very like is this a wedding room?

0:29:07.560 --> 0:29:10.480
<v Speaker 3>But it kind of works because Travis used to before

0:29:10.480 --> 0:29:13.880
<v Speaker 3>he met Taylor. He actually used to plan summer concerts

0:29:13.920 --> 0:29:16.240
<v Speaker 3>like that's how much he loves live music. So the

0:29:16.280 --> 0:29:18.160
<v Speaker 3>two of them are just genuine lives.

0:29:18.920 --> 0:29:22.840
<v Speaker 1>She could have anyone she wanted. Paul McCartney is also

0:29:22.960 --> 0:29:25.479
<v Speaker 1>rumored she could get Adele, she could get Bad Bunny.

0:29:26.160 --> 0:29:29.120
<v Speaker 1>Could she get Bad Dunny. Maybe she could get Harry sALS,

0:29:29.120 --> 0:29:32.200
<v Speaker 1>But she can't be Geuse awkward at the moment he

0:29:32.440 --> 0:29:34.360
<v Speaker 1>is and bad Bunnies in London too. But you know

0:29:34.440 --> 0:29:36.920
<v Speaker 1>for Taylor you would, you would rejig. You could get

0:29:37.040 --> 0:29:41.960
<v Speaker 1>anyone in the world. It will be amazing. But also, yeah,

0:29:42.040 --> 0:29:43.240
<v Speaker 1>a little bit over the top.

0:29:43.360 --> 0:29:46.840
<v Speaker 2>And I think you get to choose one like Brooklyn

0:29:46.840 --> 0:29:52.280
<v Speaker 2>Beckham's wedding and Mark Anthony, like you get one, you can't.

0:29:52.680 --> 0:29:55.000
<v Speaker 2>I just I don't need a full set list. I'm stressed.

0:29:56.240 --> 0:29:58.560
<v Speaker 3>It's for sure it will not be a cash bar.

0:30:00.320 --> 0:30:01.640
<v Speaker 2>No, no, no, no, I don't think so.

0:30:02.640 --> 0:30:04.440
<v Speaker 3>I saw a tweet this week which I have never

0:30:04.520 --> 0:30:06.600
<v Speaker 3>related to anything as hard as I related to this.

0:30:06.920 --> 0:30:09.320
<v Speaker 3>It read, You're in hell. You're staying with one of

0:30:09.320 --> 0:30:13.240
<v Speaker 3>those families that seemingly never eats. They skip breakfast, lunch,

0:30:13.320 --> 0:30:15.960
<v Speaker 3>rolls around and everyone says, I'm not really hungry, there

0:30:15.960 --> 0:30:18.600
<v Speaker 3>are no snacks anywhere. Then they don't eat dinner until

0:30:18.640 --> 0:30:22.200
<v Speaker 3>eight pm. I really related to this because I think

0:30:22.200 --> 0:30:25.080
<v Speaker 3>we've all had that experience. If you're someone who likes food,

0:30:25.520 --> 0:30:28.520
<v Speaker 3>you've had that experience of staying over at someone's house

0:30:28.560 --> 0:30:31.080
<v Speaker 3>and they don't eat breakfast and you're starving and you

0:30:31.120 --> 0:30:35.320
<v Speaker 3>get increasingly hungry, and they just have nothing with which

0:30:35.560 --> 0:30:38.160
<v Speaker 3>to make breakfast food with I don't mean to sound

0:30:38.200 --> 0:30:41.000
<v Speaker 3>like an ungrateful guest, but that is a reality. It

0:30:41.040 --> 0:30:43.080
<v Speaker 3>was interesting because one of the replies to this tweet

0:30:43.680 --> 0:30:46.080
<v Speaker 3>sort of explain the mindset of people who live in

0:30:46.080 --> 0:30:48.520
<v Speaker 3>food free houses. They said, a few years ago, I

0:30:48.560 --> 0:30:51.040
<v Speaker 3>had a friend who was visiting who was hungry every

0:30:51.080 --> 0:30:54.160
<v Speaker 3>two hours, like a baby, Like a baby.

0:30:54.160 --> 0:30:56.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm the baby, the baby, I want to be fed

0:30:56.520 --> 0:30:57.640
<v Speaker 1>every two hours.

0:30:58.080 --> 0:31:00.840
<v Speaker 3>And then there was this other great response, stayed at

0:31:00.840 --> 0:31:03.280
<v Speaker 3>a house like this while pregnant, and they acted shocked.

0:31:03.320 --> 0:31:05.800
<v Speaker 3>I wanted eggs and toast every morning. When I tried

0:31:05.840 --> 0:31:07.840
<v Speaker 3>to cook it, they insisted they do it and seemed

0:31:07.880 --> 0:31:10.920
<v Speaker 3>equally shocked. I wanted more than one egg. Claire, have

0:31:11.000 --> 0:31:12.320
<v Speaker 3>you ever had this experience?

0:31:12.920 --> 0:31:13.200
<v Speaker 1>Yes?

0:31:14.160 --> 0:31:18.000
<v Speaker 2>But I also understand the other side of it, which

0:31:18.160 --> 0:31:21.560
<v Speaker 2>is that I am very much if I'm in a

0:31:21.600 --> 0:31:23.960
<v Speaker 2>house with a group of people, which happened a lot.

0:31:24.360 --> 0:31:26.920
<v Speaker 2>The awkward thing for me is that I'm like, Okay,

0:31:27.000 --> 0:31:29.240
<v Speaker 2>I want breakfast right now. There are eggs in the fridge,

0:31:29.280 --> 0:31:31.560
<v Speaker 2>there are tomatoes, there, there's bread.

0:31:32.600 --> 0:31:33.240
<v Speaker 3>I am not.

0:31:33.440 --> 0:31:39.720
<v Speaker 2>Capable mentally skills wise of making a meal for the

0:31:39.720 --> 0:31:43.400
<v Speaker 2>whole group. I'm not capable of that. I believe you

0:31:43.440 --> 0:31:46.720
<v Speaker 2>couldn't slash. The way I make eggs is probably wrong

0:31:46.760 --> 0:31:50.160
<v Speaker 2>for other people, and I don't want to assume I really.

0:31:50.040 --> 0:31:51.800
<v Speaker 1>Might change their lives. You might blow their mind.

0:31:51.920 --> 0:31:54.720
<v Speaker 2>No, I make eggs wrong, I like overcook them. I've

0:31:54.720 --> 0:31:58.760
<v Speaker 2>had feedback anyway. I then don't want to presume and

0:31:58.800 --> 0:32:03.320
<v Speaker 2>make everybody this awful breakfast, because what's worse not being

0:32:03.320 --> 0:32:06.000
<v Speaker 2>fed or being fed something terrible?

0:32:06.080 --> 0:32:08.920
<v Speaker 1>Don't you think? Don't hosts just have to provide meals?

0:32:08.960 --> 0:32:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Like if people can just stay with me where I live,

0:32:12.120 --> 0:32:15.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm not lunch is hazy because lunch, I'm like, oh,

0:32:15.280 --> 0:32:18.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. Lunch is a breakfast and dinner either

0:32:18.960 --> 0:32:21.880
<v Speaker 1>cooking it or dinner or ordering it in or going

0:32:21.920 --> 0:32:23.719
<v Speaker 1>out for You have to plan that, Like are there

0:32:23.760 --> 0:32:27.920
<v Speaker 1>people who don't do that? Yes, you're one of those people.

0:32:28.080 --> 0:32:32.240
<v Speaker 2>Yes, and and the real no, see I just outsource it.

0:32:32.320 --> 0:32:33.560
<v Speaker 1>You'd be like, we're getting a pizza.

0:32:33.720 --> 0:32:37.920
<v Speaker 2>I'm an uber eats gal. But the weird thing is

0:32:38.480 --> 0:32:42.000
<v Speaker 2>Jessie and Luca are very much I think it's about clutter.

0:32:42.480 --> 0:32:44.400
<v Speaker 2>I think it's about mess if I don't want to

0:32:44.440 --> 0:32:48.200
<v Speaker 2>clean up, so whenever people go to their house, they

0:32:48.280 --> 0:32:50.800
<v Speaker 2>never have any food, And it became a thing where

0:32:51.200 --> 0:32:53.400
<v Speaker 2>Mum would call me and be like, hey, we're going

0:32:53.400 --> 0:32:59.440
<v Speaker 2>for afternoon tea. There ain't gonna be tea, so you

0:32:59.680 --> 0:33:01.440
<v Speaker 2>still and get some chippies.

0:33:01.720 --> 0:33:05.840
<v Speaker 1>And Luca thinks that food is clutter. Food is never clutter.

0:33:05.600 --> 0:33:09.000
<v Speaker 2>No world, never never. He also hates waste, so it's

0:33:09.040 --> 0:33:10.880
<v Speaker 2>a whole thing. I'm like, I'll take the waist home,

0:33:10.960 --> 0:33:11.880
<v Speaker 2>don't you worry.

0:33:11.960 --> 0:33:14.280
<v Speaker 1>So if I go away with friends for a weekend,

0:33:14.880 --> 0:33:17.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm thinking, where are we the baby? Yeah, I'm the baby,

0:33:17.640 --> 0:33:20.640
<v Speaker 1>and I'm thinking, where are we having breakfast? I'm going

0:33:20.720 --> 0:33:22.400
<v Speaker 1>to maybe do a bit of googling. I'm going to

0:33:22.480 --> 0:33:25.720
<v Speaker 1>find a good cafe. I'm going to make poor Brent,

0:33:25.760 --> 0:33:27.640
<v Speaker 1>who doesn't care. He just wants to shove something in

0:33:27.680 --> 0:33:30.240
<v Speaker 1>his face, but I care what it is. I'm going

0:33:30.320 --> 0:33:32.000
<v Speaker 1>to make him wander off with me and find it.

0:33:32.040 --> 0:33:33.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to do that. And I've been away with

0:33:33.920 --> 0:33:36.000
<v Speaker 1>people who are like, oh, not interested. Maybe I'll have

0:33:36.040 --> 0:33:38.840
<v Speaker 1>some black coffee, like fine, But then when i want

0:33:38.920 --> 0:33:41.000
<v Speaker 1>lunch then and they're like, didn't you just have breakfast?

0:33:41.320 --> 0:33:42.720
<v Speaker 3>And I'm like, what do you mean?

0:33:42.800 --> 0:33:45.800
<v Speaker 1>There was hours ago? Yes, But then it also made

0:33:45.800 --> 0:33:48.080
<v Speaker 1>me realize I do have some friends who are just

0:33:48.120 --> 0:33:51.680
<v Speaker 1>food friends. Like the reason we are close is because

0:33:51.720 --> 0:33:53.520
<v Speaker 1>we'll go out for dinner a few times a year

0:33:53.560 --> 0:33:56.400
<v Speaker 1>because we like the same things and we like to

0:33:56.440 --> 0:33:59.200
<v Speaker 1>eat the same kind of amount, and so it's our bonding.

0:33:59.480 --> 0:34:03.000
<v Speaker 1>When we were in Tasmania, we went to two TikTok breakfasts,

0:34:03.120 --> 0:34:05.760
<v Speaker 1>like places that I'd see recommended. Well, I asked out

0:34:05.760 --> 0:34:07.520
<v Speaker 1>louders and they told me, and then I'd be in

0:34:07.640 --> 0:34:10.200
<v Speaker 1>We've been in line waiting for eggs and Brenda be like,

0:34:10.239 --> 0:34:12.200
<v Speaker 1>why are we here? And I'm like, shut the fuck up,

0:34:12.239 --> 0:34:15.800
<v Speaker 1>It's the best breakfast in town. After the break Miranda

0:34:15.840 --> 0:34:20.239
<v Speaker 1>Kerr and her husband just did something amazing, or did they.

0:34:21.320 --> 0:34:25.200
<v Speaker 1>My cockles were warmed by a famous Australian and their

0:34:25.239 --> 0:34:27.960
<v Speaker 1>American spouse this week. And I don't just mean Jacob

0:34:27.960 --> 0:34:29.960
<v Speaker 1>Alordie showing Kylie Jenner around Byron Bay.

0:34:31.560 --> 0:34:33.080
<v Speaker 2>It is not Kylie.

0:34:33.360 --> 0:34:37.560
<v Speaker 1>Oh, I'm so sorry. I am so sorry. You're so right.

0:34:37.680 --> 0:34:40.719
<v Speaker 1>How could I make that mistake because obviously Kylie if

0:34:40.719 --> 0:34:42.840
<v Speaker 1>she was in Byron Bay, she'd be with Timothy shallow

0:34:42.880 --> 0:34:45.959
<v Speaker 1>May exactly. But have you seen I know we don't

0:34:46.040 --> 0:34:49.080
<v Speaker 1>we don't endorse paparazzi. Of course we do not. But

0:34:49.320 --> 0:34:53.600
<v Speaker 1>right now, Jacob A Laudie and Kendall Jenna are like

0:34:53.760 --> 0:34:57.960
<v Speaker 1>having the basic Byron experience. They're at general store getting coffee,

0:34:58.360 --> 0:35:00.439
<v Speaker 1>They're going out to dinner at such an such, They're

0:35:00.440 --> 0:35:03.520
<v Speaker 1>going shopping in main street. It's winter, it's quiet there.

0:35:04.120 --> 0:35:06.480
<v Speaker 2>It's kind of lovely, right, I think it's lovely. And

0:35:06.520 --> 0:35:09.960
<v Speaker 2>they're very much wearing like hoodies and sunglasses and trying

0:35:10.000 --> 0:35:12.600
<v Speaker 2>to not stand And am I anybody wearing a hoodie

0:35:12.600 --> 0:35:14.520
<v Speaker 2>and sunglasses in Byron You're going to be like, Hey,

0:35:14.560 --> 0:35:15.320
<v Speaker 2>that's Jacoble.

0:35:15.680 --> 0:35:18.920
<v Speaker 1>That's a really famous Anyway, I digress because that's not

0:35:18.960 --> 0:35:21.440
<v Speaker 1>who we're talking about. But anyway, Miranda Kerr is who

0:35:21.480 --> 0:35:25.960
<v Speaker 1>we are talking about. Australian supermodel and her billionaire husband,

0:35:26.080 --> 0:35:29.719
<v Speaker 1>Evan Spiegel. They popped up on Instagram and probably Snapchat.

0:35:29.719 --> 0:35:31.880
<v Speaker 1>But who would know about that except for teenagers to

0:35:31.960 --> 0:35:36.000
<v Speaker 1>tell us something surprising. Here is what Evan had to say.

0:35:36.000 --> 0:35:39.120
<v Speaker 5>Everybody, Evan and Miranda here and today we are so

0:35:39.160 --> 0:35:42.279
<v Speaker 5>excited because we're announcing a partnership with Undue medical debt

0:35:42.320 --> 0:35:45.760
<v Speaker 5>to relieve over half a billion dollars of unpaid medical

0:35:45.800 --> 0:35:48.960
<v Speaker 5>debt for more than two hundred and fifty thousand Californians.

0:35:49.480 --> 0:35:51.840
<v Speaker 2>One of the reasons we wanted to share this directly

0:35:51.960 --> 0:35:53.759
<v Speaker 2>is because if you happen to receive a letter in

0:35:53.760 --> 0:35:56.359
<v Speaker 2>the mail letting you know your medical debt has been

0:35:56.360 --> 0:35:58.359
<v Speaker 2>forgiven one, you should know it's real.

0:35:59.080 --> 0:36:01.600
<v Speaker 1>Oh my gosh, it's not a scam. If you get

0:36:01.640 --> 0:36:04.640
<v Speaker 1>a letter in the mail from Miranda Kirk telling you

0:36:04.800 --> 0:36:06.880
<v Speaker 1>that she has paid your medical debt, it is not

0:36:06.920 --> 0:36:08.439
<v Speaker 1>a scam. It is real.

0:36:08.920 --> 0:36:09.720
<v Speaker 2>That is wild.

0:36:10.040 --> 0:36:12.760
<v Speaker 1>Okay, I'll just give you a tiny bit of context,

0:36:12.840 --> 0:36:14.279
<v Speaker 1>and then Amelia is going to tell me what this

0:36:14.320 --> 0:36:17.399
<v Speaker 1>really means, because it's very American. I think what they're

0:36:17.400 --> 0:36:20.840
<v Speaker 1>talking about is there is a nonprofit organization called Undo

0:36:21.080 --> 0:36:24.440
<v Speaker 1>Medical Debt Right, and people donate to it, and it's

0:36:24.560 --> 0:36:28.759
<v Speaker 1>not for profit organization that dedicates in buying up medical debt.

0:36:29.400 --> 0:36:32.600
<v Speaker 1>So basically they buy out debt to let individuals be

0:36:32.680 --> 0:36:34.800
<v Speaker 1>free of their medical debt, which is a big deal

0:36:34.920 --> 0:36:38.320
<v Speaker 1>in the US. Amelia, We're not really used to, certainly

0:36:38.360 --> 0:36:42.279
<v Speaker 1>in this current moment, tech billionaires doing things that just

0:36:42.320 --> 0:36:46.279
<v Speaker 1>seem to be lovely things to do. Evan is worth

0:36:46.280 --> 0:36:50.319
<v Speaker 1>a reported three billion, if not more than that. This

0:36:50.440 --> 0:36:52.560
<v Speaker 1>is an incredible thing to do, right. It's a feel good,

0:36:52.560 --> 0:36:55.120
<v Speaker 1>aussy story, but is it. No?

0:36:55.280 --> 0:36:58.839
<v Speaker 3>I mean it's nice that they did it, and it's

0:36:58.880 --> 0:37:01.120
<v Speaker 3>sort of like I bought an a copy of the

0:37:01.960 --> 0:37:04.880
<v Speaker 3>Big Issue last week, and I think I should also

0:37:04.880 --> 0:37:07.720
<v Speaker 3>get recognition for that. Is nice.

0:37:08.440 --> 0:37:12.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and I just want it known. Whenever I donate

0:37:12.640 --> 0:37:15.080
<v Speaker 2>to a GoFundMe, I always include my name. You know

0:37:15.080 --> 0:37:17.640
<v Speaker 2>how you choose to do it and plea I'm like, no, no, no,

0:37:17.719 --> 0:37:19.759
<v Speaker 2>I'll put my full name so that anyone's scrolling through.

0:37:19.840 --> 0:37:21.719
<v Speaker 1>Is that what Miranda and Evan are doing?

0:37:21.800 --> 0:37:24.520
<v Speaker 2>That they've done and they go fundly, Yes, this is

0:37:24.560 --> 0:37:26.799
<v Speaker 2>my thirty dollar donation and you can see my name

0:37:26.840 --> 0:37:27.239
<v Speaker 2>next to it.

0:37:27.400 --> 0:37:31.160
<v Speaker 3>So look, just a quick primer on how much this

0:37:31.239 --> 0:37:34.879
<v Speaker 3>costs them. The headlines said that they had wiped out

0:37:34.920 --> 0:37:37.680
<v Speaker 3>five hundred and fifty million dollars of medical debt. That's

0:37:37.719 --> 0:37:39.680
<v Speaker 3>a lot. No, that's a lot. That is a lot.

0:37:39.840 --> 0:37:42.839
<v Speaker 2>That's half a billion. It's as.

0:37:44.239 --> 0:37:47.600
<v Speaker 3>Thank you the company, the nonprofit that they donated to.

0:37:47.719 --> 0:37:50.040
<v Speaker 3>If you just go to their website, they say if

0:37:50.080 --> 0:37:52.840
<v Speaker 3>you donate ten dollars, it wipes out one thousand dollars

0:37:52.880 --> 0:37:57.000
<v Speaker 3>of debt. And the reason for that discrepancy is that basically,

0:37:57.040 --> 0:37:58.520
<v Speaker 3>if you've got a hospital in the US and you

0:37:58.560 --> 0:38:01.200
<v Speaker 3>can't afford it, they keeps you a bill and then

0:38:01.239 --> 0:38:03.799
<v Speaker 3>you keep not paying, and then the hospital sells that

0:38:03.960 --> 0:38:06.560
<v Speaker 3>debt to a debt collection agency and then they come

0:38:06.640 --> 0:38:09.040
<v Speaker 3>after you and they know that you're never going to

0:38:09.080 --> 0:38:10.560
<v Speaker 3>be able to pay the full amount because if you

0:38:10.600 --> 0:38:13.319
<v Speaker 3>could pay the full amount, you wouldn't have been at

0:38:13.320 --> 0:38:17.239
<v Speaker 3>the hospital uninsured anyway. So they're just like, give us anything, like,

0:38:17.400 --> 0:38:20.160
<v Speaker 3>just give us as much money as you possibly can.

0:38:20.239 --> 0:38:22.640
<v Speaker 1>And could this be for anything from you know, you

0:38:22.680 --> 0:38:24.319
<v Speaker 1>got hit by a car and broke your leg, to

0:38:24.600 --> 0:38:25.680
<v Speaker 1>cancer treatment.

0:38:25.440 --> 0:38:28.960
<v Speaker 3>To having a baby, literally anything, And so the five

0:38:29.080 --> 0:38:32.240
<v Speaker 3>hundred and fifty million is actually more like it probably

0:38:32.320 --> 0:38:35.600
<v Speaker 3>costs them more like as little as five million, because

0:38:35.640 --> 0:38:38.839
<v Speaker 3>I'm using the same ratio that the nonprofit has on

0:38:38.840 --> 0:38:43.000
<v Speaker 3>their website. So five million dollars for Evan Spiegel and

0:38:43.040 --> 0:38:47.320
<v Speaker 3>Miranda Kerr is equivalent to about two hundred dollars for

0:38:47.440 --> 0:38:49.839
<v Speaker 3>someone who's on an average income, and like two hundred

0:38:49.880 --> 0:38:52.520
<v Speaker 3>dollars is a lot, Like if I that's that's a

0:38:52.560 --> 0:38:54.720
<v Speaker 3>lot of copies of the big issue. Like, I think,

0:38:54.800 --> 0:38:56.759
<v Speaker 3>you know, good for them, two hundred dollars is quite

0:38:56.760 --> 0:39:00.120
<v Speaker 3>a bit of money, But would you make a video

0:39:00.320 --> 0:39:03.239
<v Speaker 3>congratulating yourself for giving two hundred dollars to a go

0:39:03.360 --> 0:39:04.440
<v Speaker 3>fund me for instance.

0:39:04.640 --> 0:39:08.000
<v Speaker 1>That's cynical though, right, because they're making a video, yes,

0:39:08.160 --> 0:39:10.160
<v Speaker 1>to show that they did a good thing, but also

0:39:10.280 --> 0:39:13.000
<v Speaker 1>to encourage other people to do a good thing. Right, No,

0:39:13.320 --> 0:39:15.720
<v Speaker 1>aren't they Because they're raising awareness of undue.

0:39:17.120 --> 0:39:18.279
<v Speaker 3>That's why they're doing it.

0:39:18.360 --> 0:39:20.919
<v Speaker 1>And so they said, like they said, we did this,

0:39:21.080 --> 0:39:22.640
<v Speaker 1>and then they said, if you're not aware of the

0:39:22.680 --> 0:39:25.239
<v Speaker 1>great work on geo medical debt, do and then presumably

0:39:25.239 --> 0:39:27.240
<v Speaker 1>other people can do it too. So it's like a promotion.

0:39:28.040 --> 0:39:31.440
<v Speaker 3>Okay, yeah, I'm sure it's raising awareness. But there are

0:39:31.480 --> 0:39:35.000
<v Speaker 3>also rumors that Evan Spiegel is planning a run to

0:39:35.040 --> 0:39:39.040
<v Speaker 3>be governor of California, which is a very important political

0:39:39.080 --> 0:39:41.399
<v Speaker 3>position in the US. It's what Ronald Reagan was, It's

0:39:41.440 --> 0:39:43.040
<v Speaker 3>what Arnold Schwarzenegger was.

0:39:43.280 --> 0:39:45.760
<v Speaker 1>Gavin Newsom is he the governor's Gavin?

0:39:45.920 --> 0:39:50.240
<v Speaker 3>It's exactly what Gavin Newsom is. And one wonders if

0:39:50.440 --> 0:39:53.560
<v Speaker 3>this is not part of a campaign to introduce US

0:39:53.640 --> 0:39:57.959
<v Speaker 3>to this warm and cuddly Evan Spiegel tech billionaire, because look,

0:39:58.040 --> 0:40:02.720
<v Speaker 3>I just have to mention that in April his company

0:40:02.760 --> 0:40:05.600
<v Speaker 3>Snap laid off sixteen percent of its staff and said

0:40:05.600 --> 0:40:07.920
<v Speaker 3>that they would have AI replaced those sixteen percent of

0:40:07.920 --> 0:40:11.719
<v Speaker 3>staff and then their stock prices sored. I think there

0:40:11.800 --> 0:40:14.640
<v Speaker 3>is one good billionaire in the world, and that one

0:40:14.640 --> 0:40:17.800
<v Speaker 3>good billionaire is Mackenzie Scott, who was Jeff Bezos's ex

0:40:18.280 --> 0:40:21.600
<v Speaker 3>Last year, she alone gave one third of all the

0:40:21.640 --> 0:40:24.960
<v Speaker 3>philanthropic money in the United States, one third from one woman.

0:40:25.160 --> 0:40:28.640
<v Speaker 3>She donated seven billion dollars in one year, and that

0:40:28.800 --> 0:40:31.080
<v Speaker 3>is the equivalent of twenty thousand dollars for someone on

0:40:31.120 --> 0:40:33.640
<v Speaker 3>an average income. Now that is what I call generosity.

0:40:34.320 --> 0:40:37.520
<v Speaker 1>She also gave money to these guys, so did John Oliver,

0:40:37.680 --> 0:40:39.000
<v Speaker 1>the medical debt people.

0:40:39.040 --> 0:40:41.080
<v Speaker 3>And by the way, she didn't make a video about it,

0:40:41.160 --> 0:40:41.840
<v Speaker 3>she just did it.

0:40:41.960 --> 0:40:44.719
<v Speaker 1>No this look, this is exciting development for me in

0:40:44.960 --> 0:40:49.400
<v Speaker 1>the political realm because now I'm imagining Miranda Curis first lady.

0:40:49.520 --> 0:40:50.520
<v Speaker 2>She dressed very well.

0:40:50.760 --> 0:40:52.120
<v Speaker 1>She would be great for that.

0:40:52.600 --> 0:40:55.640
<v Speaker 2>I have been thinking Mirandaka has been around a bit lately,

0:40:55.760 --> 0:40:59.560
<v Speaker 2>like you see her popping up doing a few interviews,

0:40:59.840 --> 0:41:02.680
<v Speaker 2>and like, I feel like she kind of disappeared for

0:41:02.719 --> 0:41:04.280
<v Speaker 2>a bit, and now she's she's.

0:41:04.160 --> 0:41:06.879
<v Speaker 3>Not the skincare brand, right, Yeah.

0:41:06.560 --> 0:41:09.399
<v Speaker 2>But I feel like she disappeared a bit in terms

0:41:09.440 --> 0:41:12.200
<v Speaker 2>of like her own personal brand, whereas I've seen her

0:41:12.800 --> 0:41:16.000
<v Speaker 2>re emerging talking about motherhood all of that stuff, And

0:41:16.080 --> 0:41:20.279
<v Speaker 2>I wonder if that's also like emerging so that she

0:41:20.440 --> 0:41:20.799
<v Speaker 2>can be.

0:41:21.120 --> 0:41:23.919
<v Speaker 3>A first FIO, just so she can somewhat humoric months.

0:41:24.040 --> 0:41:24.279
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:41:24.400 --> 0:41:27.920
<v Speaker 3>No, look, that's cynical of me. It's lovely, it's lovely.

0:41:28.080 --> 0:41:30.839
<v Speaker 1>Look, I know what you mean that You're like, this

0:41:31.160 --> 0:41:33.560
<v Speaker 1>looks like a big thing, but for them it was

0:41:33.600 --> 0:41:38.040
<v Speaker 1>a little thing. But aren't we generally positive and encouraging

0:41:38.239 --> 0:41:41.480
<v Speaker 1>about the mega rich thinking about other people?

0:41:41.960 --> 0:41:43.880
<v Speaker 3>You know? It comes back to taxes for me. I

0:41:43.960 --> 0:41:46.200
<v Speaker 3>wonder how much taxes Evan speak Golt paid last year.

0:41:46.200 --> 0:41:48.359
<v Speaker 3>I bet it was less than Prince Charles. Like, I

0:41:48.480 --> 0:41:51.080
<v Speaker 3>just bet that he paid less taxes last year than

0:41:51.160 --> 0:41:51.720
<v Speaker 3>King Charles.

0:41:52.000 --> 0:41:56.799
<v Speaker 2>I sometimes the cynicism worries me because, as you say,

0:41:56.880 --> 0:42:01.560
<v Speaker 2>Mackenzie Scott has given so much money charity, but she

0:42:01.840 --> 0:42:07.640
<v Speaker 2>is also the victim of this cynicism. Like Elon Musk

0:42:07.719 --> 0:42:11.280
<v Speaker 2>has tweeted that she it didn't make any sense. Basically,

0:42:11.320 --> 0:42:14.160
<v Speaker 2>somebody tweeted that she has made the world worse by

0:42:14.160 --> 0:42:17.479
<v Speaker 2>giving away that much money, and Elon Musk is like, yes,

0:42:17.560 --> 0:42:20.800
<v Speaker 2>I'm afraid I agree. And it's like what I don't understand,

0:42:20.840 --> 0:42:23.160
<v Speaker 2>And it's like we're muddying the water. Is so much

0:42:23.239 --> 0:42:26.200
<v Speaker 2>about what is actually an ethical thing to do and

0:42:26.320 --> 0:42:27.680
<v Speaker 2>not an ethical thing to do.

0:42:28.800 --> 0:42:32.680
<v Speaker 3>Because Elon must tweeted something, isn't he just muddying everything? Yes?

0:42:33.040 --> 0:42:37.640
<v Speaker 2>Yes, And speaking of Elon, you may remember the other

0:42:37.680 --> 0:42:41.520
<v Speaker 2>week he became a trillionaire. He did very important, very

0:42:41.560 --> 0:42:45.759
<v Speaker 2>important congrats he needed that notch on his belt, and

0:42:46.200 --> 0:42:49.080
<v Speaker 2>a lot of commentary I saw at that time was

0:42:49.120 --> 0:42:53.080
<v Speaker 2>about how a few years ago he put out a

0:42:53.120 --> 0:42:58.640
<v Speaker 2>tweet basically saying, I will give the UN World Food

0:42:58.719 --> 0:43:04.120
<v Speaker 2>Program billion dollars to solve world hunger if they can

0:43:04.200 --> 0:43:08.120
<v Speaker 2>lay out how they would spend that money and actually

0:43:08.160 --> 0:43:12.239
<v Speaker 2>solve it. And people people like Elon Musk love this

0:43:12.280 --> 0:43:16.239
<v Speaker 2>strategy because it's like, I'm so smart, you guys, You

0:43:16.280 --> 0:43:18.440
<v Speaker 2>guys try and be smart, like you guys, try and

0:43:18.440 --> 0:43:20.640
<v Speaker 2>tell me how you'd actually solve this. But I think

0:43:20.719 --> 0:43:24.680
<v Speaker 2>you're idiots. With money, so he put that out there,

0:43:25.040 --> 0:43:32.000
<v Speaker 2>and then eventually the World Food Program did come back

0:43:32.360 --> 0:43:36.200
<v Speaker 2>with a plan of exactly how they'd spend that money,

0:43:36.719 --> 0:43:40.440
<v Speaker 2>and they said they could actually solve famine rather than

0:43:40.480 --> 0:43:44.359
<v Speaker 2>world hunger, which are two different things. But because they

0:43:44.480 --> 0:43:48.320
<v Speaker 2>responded in a separate Twitter thread and not the Twitter

0:43:48.360 --> 0:43:52.560
<v Speaker 2>thread that Elon Musk had originally started, and Elon Musk

0:43:52.600 --> 0:43:55.040
<v Speaker 2>said it had to be in that first Twitter thread,

0:43:55.480 --> 0:43:59.640
<v Speaker 2>they were the conditions. He never responded or acknowledged it,

0:43:59.800 --> 0:44:02.319
<v Speaker 2>so he just didn't donate his six billion dollars and

0:44:02.360 --> 0:44:05.399
<v Speaker 2>instead he bought Twitter and rebranded it to X, which

0:44:05.440 --> 0:44:07.440
<v Speaker 2>I think we can all agree has been really important

0:44:07.440 --> 0:44:09.239
<v Speaker 2>for humanity and has stopped a lot of people's stuff.

0:44:09.440 --> 0:44:12.160
<v Speaker 3>No, but you, the point you're making is like I

0:44:12.200 --> 0:44:15.279
<v Speaker 3>should stop braining on their parade. It's just it's a

0:44:15.320 --> 0:44:18.680
<v Speaker 3>lovely thing they did. It just makes me uncomfortable when

0:44:18.719 --> 0:44:24.879
<v Speaker 3>I see rich people want my validation for doing the

0:44:24.920 --> 0:44:27.320
<v Speaker 3>bare minimum what should be the bare minimum?

0:44:27.360 --> 0:44:29.759
<v Speaker 2>I do think it's very important to break down exactly

0:44:30.280 --> 0:44:35.320
<v Speaker 2>how much it actually costs them and what the motive

0:44:35.440 --> 0:44:37.680
<v Speaker 2>may be for that kind of public statement.

0:44:37.840 --> 0:44:41.799
<v Speaker 1>I'm just always happy that it's not just another yacht. Yeah, yeah,

0:44:41.800 --> 0:44:48.080
<v Speaker 1>when I was in Tasmania recently famously Tasmanian multimillionaire David Wells,

0:44:48.160 --> 0:44:50.320
<v Speaker 1>bit of a controversial guy, made all his money and gambling.

0:44:50.360 --> 0:44:52.759
<v Speaker 1>He freely admits terrible for the world, Like terrible for

0:44:52.800 --> 0:44:55.920
<v Speaker 1>the world. He is atoned for that by building a

0:44:55.960 --> 0:45:01.080
<v Speaker 1>world class art museum in that city and arguably resurrecting

0:45:01.120 --> 0:45:05.200
<v Speaker 1>the economy of that entire state, increasing tourism, putting something

0:45:05.239 --> 0:45:07.879
<v Speaker 1>really interesting out there. And he's on the record as

0:45:07.920 --> 0:45:10.440
<v Speaker 1>saying I could have used all my money, all my

0:45:10.520 --> 0:45:13.600
<v Speaker 1>gambling money, to buy yachts and more cars and all

0:45:13.640 --> 0:45:17.239
<v Speaker 1>those things, but instead I wanted to do something interesting.

0:45:17.320 --> 0:45:20.279
<v Speaker 1>Does he have selfish reasons for doing it? Yes. He

0:45:20.480 --> 0:45:23.319
<v Speaker 1>likes art, he likes provocative stuff. He wants to have

0:45:23.320 --> 0:45:26.440
<v Speaker 1>a legacy. He wants everyone to remember him when he's gone. Like,

0:45:26.719 --> 0:45:29.279
<v Speaker 1>does it matter that it's a selfish reason if it

0:45:29.360 --> 0:45:31.480
<v Speaker 1>has actually made the world better other than him just

0:45:31.480 --> 0:45:34.160
<v Speaker 1>having a bigger boat. So where any time you have

0:45:34.200 --> 0:45:36.759
<v Speaker 1>an example, particularly at the moment when we seem to

0:45:36.760 --> 0:45:40.719
<v Speaker 1>be in the thrall of people who are richer than

0:45:40.800 --> 0:45:44.360
<v Speaker 1>humans have ever been before, and they are too and

0:45:44.400 --> 0:45:47.239
<v Speaker 1>they're more powerful than governments, and they're more powerful than companies,

0:45:47.680 --> 0:45:51.280
<v Speaker 1>and they're choosing often to use that power in ways

0:45:51.280 --> 0:45:53.279
<v Speaker 1>that many of us wouldn't think was that good for

0:45:53.320 --> 0:45:56.560
<v Speaker 1>the world, Like at least one of them or two

0:45:56.640 --> 0:45:58.680
<v Speaker 1>of them standing up every now and again and going,

0:45:58.880 --> 0:46:01.400
<v Speaker 1>you know what, I also did this, Yeah, and.

0:46:01.440 --> 0:46:03.920
<v Speaker 3>It's going to make a difference to hundreds of thousands

0:46:03.920 --> 0:46:04.360
<v Speaker 3>of people.

0:46:04.920 --> 0:46:07.880
<v Speaker 2>One argument I did see recently, and I saw it

0:46:07.920 --> 0:46:10.880
<v Speaker 2>on Reddit, so you know, it's a very valid, research

0:46:10.920 --> 0:46:15.640
<v Speaker 2>based argument was there was a question about why a

0:46:15.680 --> 0:46:18.680
<v Speaker 2>few generations ago, particularly in America, a lot of the

0:46:18.880 --> 0:46:23.600
<v Speaker 2>big names like Vanderbilts, like all of those Rockefellers, all

0:46:23.640 --> 0:46:27.560
<v Speaker 2>of those were known for putting a whole lot of

0:46:27.600 --> 0:46:33.320
<v Speaker 2>money into education or health or building hospital wings, whatever.

0:46:34.160 --> 0:46:37.880
<v Speaker 2>And I'm sure that's the case all over the world,

0:46:37.960 --> 0:46:41.400
<v Speaker 2>but particularly in America. And someone said, why is it

0:46:41.440 --> 0:46:43.920
<v Speaker 2>that we've got We've now got all these people and

0:46:43.920 --> 0:46:47.800
<v Speaker 2>Elon Musk is focused on another planet instead of actually

0:46:48.040 --> 0:46:51.080
<v Speaker 2>doing these initiatives that could make society better. And there

0:46:51.080 --> 0:46:53.759
<v Speaker 2>was a really interesting argument that was, like again a

0:46:53.760 --> 0:46:58.200
<v Speaker 2>cynical argument that a few generations ago, people, the very

0:46:58.280 --> 0:47:02.120
<v Speaker 2>rich people, did that to create a bit of an

0:47:02.200 --> 0:47:05.480
<v Speaker 2>argument against the tax system. It's like, don't tax me,

0:47:05.960 --> 0:47:08.480
<v Speaker 2>because look at all the great things I'm already doing.

0:47:09.360 --> 0:47:12.680
<v Speaker 2>And so I do understand your point that if you

0:47:12.680 --> 0:47:16.040
<v Speaker 2>look at Evan Spiegel and you think, well, mate, if

0:47:16.120 --> 0:47:20.239
<v Speaker 2>you just paid fair taxes, then a lot of the

0:47:20.280 --> 0:47:23.799
<v Speaker 2>social issues that you're now trying to repair could have

0:47:23.880 --> 0:47:26.680
<v Speaker 2>actually could have actually been supported.

0:47:26.760 --> 0:47:29.920
<v Speaker 1>I can't believe that I'm defending billionaires here. This seems

0:47:30.080 --> 0:47:32.919
<v Speaker 1>very strange for me. But one of the things is

0:47:32.920 --> 0:47:34.640
<v Speaker 1>is I'm sure that some of those very very rich

0:47:34.640 --> 0:47:36.680
<v Speaker 1>people say I do all kinds of philanthropic things, I

0:47:36.760 --> 0:47:38.839
<v Speaker 1>just don't tell everybody about it. Taylor Swift is one

0:47:38.880 --> 0:47:41.120
<v Speaker 1>of those people, right. She rarely tells people about the

0:47:41.120 --> 0:47:44.359
<v Speaker 1>philanthropic things she does, but it sneaks out every now

0:47:44.400 --> 0:47:47.080
<v Speaker 1>and again that she, yeah, she did funded a program

0:47:47.120 --> 0:47:49.040
<v Speaker 1>in that city she was playing in, or did whatever.

0:47:49.560 --> 0:47:51.960
<v Speaker 1>The thing is is, if they tell you, they're damned.

0:47:52.600 --> 0:47:55.720
<v Speaker 1>If they don't tell you, you assume they're just buying yachts.

0:47:56.120 --> 0:47:58.880
<v Speaker 1>So well, somebody think of the poor simple ring.

0:47:59.000 --> 0:48:03.440
<v Speaker 3>I mean, McKenzie's got has threaded that needle, right, because

0:48:03.680 --> 0:48:05.680
<v Speaker 3>she does release the report every year that says where

0:48:05.680 --> 0:48:08.600
<v Speaker 3>her money is going. She is not releasing videos telling

0:48:08.680 --> 0:48:10.600
<v Speaker 3>us all about how great she is. So I think

0:48:10.640 --> 0:48:11.640
<v Speaker 3>there is an option.

0:48:12.640 --> 0:48:14.800
<v Speaker 1>That is all we have time for on this Monday.

0:48:14.960 --> 0:48:17.320
<v Speaker 1>It is our last week of you, Clare Stevens, before

0:48:17.360 --> 0:48:19.960
<v Speaker 1>you go off to have baby boy. Last Monday, we

0:48:20.000 --> 0:48:21.719
<v Speaker 1>are going to treasure every moment of it.

0:48:21.920 --> 0:48:24.240
<v Speaker 2>I can't believe I'm going to miss Taylor Swift's wedding.

0:48:24.560 --> 0:48:28.439
<v Speaker 1>I bet yours quietly happy. She's like, no texts from

0:48:28.480 --> 0:48:31.480
<v Speaker 1>the first at four am on Saturday morning.

0:48:31.640 --> 0:48:33.920
<v Speaker 2>I'll save my PhD for something else exactly.

0:48:35.000 --> 0:48:37.520
<v Speaker 1>But we're going to have a great week until you go.

0:48:38.280 --> 0:48:40.480
<v Speaker 1>Thank you out louders for being here with us as always.

0:48:40.520 --> 0:48:43.279
<v Speaker 1>Oh thank you out louders who all responded to the

0:48:43.280 --> 0:48:45.520
<v Speaker 1>conversation we had on Friday about whether or not it

0:48:45.600 --> 0:48:47.800
<v Speaker 1>was okay to pick lemons from someone else's tree.

0:48:47.880 --> 0:48:50.799
<v Speaker 2>The radical suggestion to knock on someone's door and ask

0:48:50.840 --> 0:48:52.680
<v Speaker 2>if you can have one of their lemons. This is

0:48:52.760 --> 0:48:55.440
<v Speaker 2>why we love out Louders, because I never would have

0:48:55.440 --> 0:48:55.960
<v Speaker 2>thought of that.

0:48:56.560 --> 0:48:59.920
<v Speaker 1>It's true. The general consensus was no to pick a

0:49:00.120 --> 0:49:03.960
<v Speaker 1>flowers from other people's gardens, but that you should ask,

0:49:04.040 --> 0:49:06.520
<v Speaker 1>and people love to share lemons, so there you go.

0:49:06.800 --> 0:49:09.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't because my lemon tree only has two lemons

0:49:09.440 --> 0:49:12.080
<v Speaker 1>on it, and if anyone stole one of those lemons,

0:49:12.080 --> 0:49:14.400
<v Speaker 1>I would cry. But that's because I'm not a very

0:49:14.440 --> 0:49:17.319
<v Speaker 1>good gardener yet. Anyway, I digress. We will see you

0:49:17.920 --> 0:49:20.440
<v Speaker 1>on Wednesday, and Mia and I will be back in

0:49:20.480 --> 0:49:22.040
<v Speaker 1>your ears with scoreless gossip tomorrow.

0:49:22.120 --> 0:49:22.799
<v Speaker 3>Goodbye.

0:49:24.480 --> 0:49:27.600
<v Speaker 2>Mommer acknowledges the traditional owners of the land on which

0:49:27.640 --> 0:49:29.040
<v Speaker 2>we've recorded this podcast.