WEBVTT - Sex, The Ick & Attachment Styles

0:00:10.405 --> 0:00:13.125
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to a MoMA Mia podcast.

0:00:13.925 --> 0:00:16.885
<v Speaker 2>Mama Maya acknowledges the traditional owners of land and waters

0:00:16.885 --> 0:00:18.525
<v Speaker 2>that this podcast is recorded on.

0:00:19.445 --> 0:00:22.325
<v Speaker 1>Oh, this could be a whole episode. Let's see. Let's

0:00:22.365 --> 0:00:26.725
<v Speaker 1>talk about sex. A lot of people use sex to

0:00:27.245 --> 0:00:31.885
<v Speaker 1>try to build attachment, and that's actually not a great

0:00:31.965 --> 0:00:34.925
<v Speaker 1>way to use sex. We want to think about can

0:00:34.965 --> 0:00:39.445
<v Speaker 1>I develop a secure attachment first, and then sex is

0:00:39.485 --> 0:00:43.325
<v Speaker 1>a way to deepen a healthy secure attachment.

0:00:50.645 --> 0:00:53.645
<v Speaker 2>From Mom Maya, this is no filter and I'm Maya Friedman.

0:00:54.645 --> 0:00:56.725
<v Speaker 2>I don't want to over promise here, but I think

0:00:56.725 --> 0:00:59.405
<v Speaker 2>this episode is going to help you have better relationships,

0:00:59.845 --> 0:01:04.685
<v Speaker 2>choose better romantic partners, and maybe understand the shitty relationships

0:01:04.685 --> 0:01:07.005
<v Speaker 2>that you've had in the past or might still be having,

0:01:07.685 --> 0:01:10.205
<v Speaker 2>because the origin of every relationship ship that we have

0:01:10.805 --> 0:01:15.205
<v Speaker 2>is our attachment style, and knowing what yours is and

0:01:15.245 --> 0:01:17.805
<v Speaker 2>how it affects the way that you interact with people

0:01:18.125 --> 0:01:21.005
<v Speaker 2>and the romantic partners that you choose can be a

0:01:21.045 --> 0:01:25.445
<v Speaker 2>total game changer. I've heard about attachment theory before, maybe

0:01:25.445 --> 0:01:28.165
<v Speaker 2>you have too, but nobody has ever explained to me

0:01:28.205 --> 0:01:31.685
<v Speaker 2>exactly how it works. So before interviewing my guest today,

0:01:31.885 --> 0:01:34.925
<v Speaker 2>who is an expert on attachment styles. I did a

0:01:35.005 --> 0:01:38.445
<v Speaker 2>quiz to find out what my style is. There are

0:01:38.485 --> 0:01:41.805
<v Speaker 2>four styles, and only one of them is the one

0:01:41.845 --> 0:01:44.405
<v Speaker 2>that you want. And guess what. I do not have

0:01:44.525 --> 0:01:48.405
<v Speaker 2>that style, and seventy five percent of you or more

0:01:48.845 --> 0:01:52.845
<v Speaker 2>probably don't either. So why does it matter? Great question?

0:01:53.565 --> 0:01:56.325
<v Speaker 2>It turns out that it matters rather a lot, because

0:01:56.325 --> 0:01:59.885
<v Speaker 2>our attachment styles dictate the kinds of romantic partners that

0:01:59.925 --> 0:02:02.485
<v Speaker 2>we choose, and also how we show up in almost

0:02:02.485 --> 0:02:06.005
<v Speaker 2>every relationship in our lives, not just the romantic ones,

0:02:06.365 --> 0:02:09.485
<v Speaker 2>but also the relationships that we have with friends and

0:02:09.525 --> 0:02:13.085
<v Speaker 2>coworkers and kids. If you have them, all of it.

0:02:13.525 --> 0:02:17.285
<v Speaker 2>Our attachment style impacts us in really fundamental ways, and

0:02:17.365 --> 0:02:20.125
<v Speaker 2>learning which one you are can unlock a whole room

0:02:20.245 --> 0:02:23.485
<v Speaker 2>of understanding about yourself and make your life easier. And

0:02:23.525 --> 0:02:26.245
<v Speaker 2>who doesn't want that? Me? I want that. I want

0:02:26.245 --> 0:02:29.445
<v Speaker 2>my life to be easier. Doctor Morgan Anderson is a

0:02:29.485 --> 0:02:33.445
<v Speaker 2>clinical psychologist who has a podcast called Let's Get Vulnerable,

0:02:34.005 --> 0:02:37.245
<v Speaker 2>and she's an attachment theory expert whose goal it is

0:02:37.285 --> 0:02:40.485
<v Speaker 2>to help women heal to have better relationships and men.

0:02:40.645 --> 0:02:43.485
<v Speaker 2>I guess but she mostly deals with women, and I

0:02:43.525 --> 0:02:47.085
<v Speaker 2>would also like to have better relationships, please. So my

0:02:47.205 --> 0:02:51.005
<v Speaker 2>first question to Dr Morgan, who I immediately began calling

0:02:51.085 --> 0:02:54.645
<v Speaker 2>Morgues because I don't like calling people by their formal names,

0:02:55.245 --> 0:02:59.165
<v Speaker 2>probably because I have an anxious attachment style. Anyway, my

0:02:59.245 --> 0:03:02.525
<v Speaker 2>first question to Morgues was about what happened in her

0:03:02.605 --> 0:03:06.485
<v Speaker 2>life to make her decide to make attachment theory her specialty.

0:03:07.645 --> 0:03:08.605
<v Speaker 2>So let's get into it.

0:03:09.645 --> 0:03:12.445
<v Speaker 1>Well, we'll be here for three hours now. I'm just kidding.

0:03:13.045 --> 0:03:17.685
<v Speaker 1>So I experienced childhood trauma. I lost my mom at

0:03:17.725 --> 0:03:21.165
<v Speaker 1>a young age. I was six years old, and I

0:03:21.205 --> 0:03:24.805
<v Speaker 1>then went through my dad actually being in some really

0:03:24.805 --> 0:03:27.845
<v Speaker 1>difficult relationships. There was a lot of chaos in my

0:03:27.925 --> 0:03:33.045
<v Speaker 1>family system growing up. So that was the beginning. And then,

0:03:33.085 --> 0:03:36.405
<v Speaker 1>of course when I began to date, I was in

0:03:36.445 --> 0:03:40.605
<v Speaker 1>my teens early twenties. I was very attracted to the

0:03:40.645 --> 0:03:46.325
<v Speaker 1>emotionally unavailable man. And I always tell people it was

0:03:46.405 --> 0:03:48.765
<v Speaker 1>like I was dating the same guy over and over again,

0:03:48.885 --> 0:03:54.365
<v Speaker 1>different haircut, but it was the same emotional dynamic.

0:03:54.085 --> 0:03:56.245
<v Speaker 2>Which was what took me through that guy.

0:03:56.845 --> 0:04:03.365
<v Speaker 1>Yes, he was the quintessential unpredictable, not stable, doesn't do

0:04:03.485 --> 0:04:07.245
<v Speaker 1>what he says he's going to do. I'm walking on eggshells,

0:04:07.285 --> 0:04:11.445
<v Speaker 1>trying to prove my worthiness. Maybe I'm changing things about myself, thinking, oh,

0:04:11.445 --> 0:04:13.925
<v Speaker 1>if I'm different in this way, then I can get

0:04:14.005 --> 0:04:18.325
<v Speaker 1>him to want me. I experienced all kinds of terrible

0:04:18.405 --> 0:04:23.405
<v Speaker 1>things that you do in toxic relationships, cheating, lying, people

0:04:23.445 --> 0:04:26.965
<v Speaker 1>who were married, people who had whole different lives. I

0:04:26.965 --> 0:04:31.445
<v Speaker 1>didn't know about all kinds of relational drama. And then

0:04:31.485 --> 0:04:34.045
<v Speaker 1>it really came to a head when I found myself

0:04:34.085 --> 0:04:38.245
<v Speaker 1>in a relationship with a narcissist. And a narcissist is

0:04:38.685 --> 0:04:41.885
<v Speaker 1>kind of the most emotionally unavailable type of partner you

0:04:41.925 --> 0:04:44.445
<v Speaker 1>can be with. And I was in my second year

0:04:44.485 --> 0:04:47.485
<v Speaker 1>of graduate school and I was dating him for about

0:04:47.525 --> 0:04:50.445
<v Speaker 1>a year and a half. And then at the end

0:04:50.485 --> 0:04:54.525
<v Speaker 1>of that relationship, I just hit absolute rock bottom. I

0:04:54.565 --> 0:04:57.925
<v Speaker 1>had had a near death experience. I had to go

0:04:57.965 --> 0:04:59.405
<v Speaker 1>file a police report.

0:04:59.965 --> 0:05:03.805
<v Speaker 2>Do you mean within your relationship? Yes, So there was

0:05:03.885 --> 0:05:06.725
<v Speaker 2>domestic violence with this guy who was a narcissist.

0:05:06.925 --> 0:05:10.925
<v Speaker 1>Yes, domestic violence, I mean just the most traumatic type

0:05:10.965 --> 0:05:13.965
<v Speaker 1>of experience you can have where you are scared for

0:05:14.005 --> 0:05:17.365
<v Speaker 1>your life essentially. And I went through that and I

0:05:17.445 --> 0:05:20.845
<v Speaker 1>just thought, I don't even recognize myself. Who am I

0:05:20.925 --> 0:05:23.365
<v Speaker 1>and I just had this fork in the road moment

0:05:24.045 --> 0:05:27.565
<v Speaker 1>where I knew I can keep going down this path,

0:05:27.645 --> 0:05:31.765
<v Speaker 1>I can keep repeating these same relationship dynamics. I don't

0:05:31.765 --> 0:05:33.645
<v Speaker 1>know if I'm going to be alive it was that

0:05:34.085 --> 0:05:38.765
<v Speaker 1>toxic or I can decide to heal. I can decide

0:05:38.805 --> 0:05:40.965
<v Speaker 1>to try to figure out how do you have a

0:05:40.965 --> 0:05:44.925
<v Speaker 1>healthy relationship? Something I had never figured out. And I

0:05:45.085 --> 0:05:49.965
<v Speaker 1>chose that path, and I threw myself into researching attachment

0:05:50.045 --> 0:05:53.965
<v Speaker 1>styles and learning everything I could about rewiring your brain

0:05:54.525 --> 0:05:57.285
<v Speaker 1>so that you can have a healthy relationship. And then

0:05:57.325 --> 0:06:00.365
<v Speaker 1>here I am, what is it? A decade later, and

0:06:00.645 --> 0:06:04.285
<v Speaker 1>I've helped thousands of people become securely attached. I'm in

0:06:04.325 --> 0:06:09.285
<v Speaker 1>an incredible relationship with my fiance We're getting married next year.

0:06:09.445 --> 0:06:13.045
<v Speaker 1>He's my best friend, and I'm just I'm very, very

0:06:13.085 --> 0:06:16.005
<v Speaker 1>happy in my life. But that version of you ten

0:06:16.085 --> 0:06:18.725
<v Speaker 1>years ago would be shocked that I was able to

0:06:18.725 --> 0:06:19.565
<v Speaker 1>get to this place.

0:06:20.205 --> 0:06:23.325
<v Speaker 2>Can I ask about your fiancee? Was he different to

0:06:23.445 --> 0:06:25.005
<v Speaker 2>every guy you'd die did before?

0:06:25.365 --> 0:06:29.685
<v Speaker 1>That's a great question. As I was doing my healing work,

0:06:30.445 --> 0:06:33.805
<v Speaker 1>I had started to attract a healthier type of partner,

0:06:34.325 --> 0:06:37.885
<v Speaker 1>So I was starting to date emotionally available people. But

0:06:38.005 --> 0:06:40.845
<v Speaker 1>I will say there's something about my fiance. I think

0:06:40.885 --> 0:06:46.485
<v Speaker 1>he's probably one of the most emotionally available, thoughtful, emotionally

0:06:46.485 --> 0:06:49.925
<v Speaker 1>intelligent men that I've ever met, and I from the

0:06:50.085 --> 0:06:52.725
<v Speaker 1>very beginning I felt emotionally safe with him.

0:06:53.045 --> 0:06:56.245
<v Speaker 2>There's so much talk about attachment theory and attachment styles

0:06:56.925 --> 0:07:01.085
<v Speaker 2>at the moment, and there are four different attachment styles.

0:07:01.845 --> 0:07:02.525
<v Speaker 2>What are they?

0:07:03.285 --> 0:07:09.885
<v Speaker 1>Yes, so we have anxious attachment, avoidant attachment, or organized

0:07:09.925 --> 0:07:15.685
<v Speaker 1>aka fearful avoidant, and secure attachment style. And I always

0:07:15.765 --> 0:07:18.125
<v Speaker 1>like people to know that this is not a way

0:07:18.205 --> 0:07:21.565
<v Speaker 1>to label yourself. It's not a way to judge yourself.

0:07:22.085 --> 0:07:24.485
<v Speaker 1>When we understand our attachment style, it's a way to

0:07:24.525 --> 0:07:28.365
<v Speaker 1>have acceptance and compassion so that we can heal.

0:07:28.685 --> 0:07:32.685
<v Speaker 2>I quite like labeling myself. I find it useful because

0:07:33.005 --> 0:07:35.725
<v Speaker 2>to me it just opens up into some insights and

0:07:35.765 --> 0:07:39.285
<v Speaker 2>to some maybe some tools. And instead of saying, oh,

0:07:39.405 --> 0:07:42.325
<v Speaker 2>I just like bad guys or I just you know,

0:07:42.565 --> 0:07:45.805
<v Speaker 2>choose this type of relationship. I like the idea that

0:07:45.845 --> 0:07:48.325
<v Speaker 2>there's a reason for it. It's not just you know,

0:07:48.525 --> 0:07:50.365
<v Speaker 2>something that comes out of the blue and that you

0:07:50.445 --> 0:07:55.005
<v Speaker 2>have no control over or that's just really random attachment

0:07:55.005 --> 0:07:58.765
<v Speaker 2>theory is grounded in this idea that our attachment styles

0:07:58.765 --> 0:08:01.685
<v Speaker 2>are baked in from childhood, from when we're babies. Is

0:08:01.725 --> 0:08:02.165
<v Speaker 2>that right?

0:08:02.605 --> 0:08:06.525
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely, yes, that it begins Some people would say even

0:08:06.565 --> 0:08:10.485
<v Speaker 1>before birth, but that you were attachedment style is forming

0:08:11.245 --> 0:08:16.605
<v Speaker 1>throughout all of your various relational experiences. Early attachment theory

0:08:16.685 --> 0:08:20.285
<v Speaker 1>research would say, Okay, it's your relationship with your caregivers,

0:08:20.805 --> 0:08:25.925
<v Speaker 1>that's it. But we now know that your early romantic relationships,

0:08:26.045 --> 0:08:29.805
<v Speaker 1>your friendships, all of your relational experiences play a role

0:08:30.245 --> 0:08:32.765
<v Speaker 1>in forming your unique attachment style.

0:08:33.205 --> 0:08:36.205
<v Speaker 2>So it's not just your parents or the people who

0:08:36.365 --> 0:08:36.805
<v Speaker 2>raised you.

0:08:37.365 --> 0:08:37.525
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:08:38.005 --> 0:08:42.725
<v Speaker 2>Interesting, So when you say there's four secure, anxious, avoidant,

0:08:42.725 --> 0:08:46.045
<v Speaker 2>and disorganized, can we just go through and you can

0:08:46.085 --> 0:08:49.165
<v Speaker 2>explain to me some of the characteristics of each of

0:08:49.205 --> 0:08:51.725
<v Speaker 2>those styles. And let's start with secure.

0:08:52.365 --> 0:08:55.005
<v Speaker 1>Okay, I love secure. Secure is where we all want

0:08:55.045 --> 0:08:55.245
<v Speaker 1>to be.

0:08:55.645 --> 0:08:57.885
<v Speaker 2>I was going to say, I like a leaderboard, Morgan,

0:08:58.125 --> 0:09:01.885
<v Speaker 2>and I like to understand what is the best one

0:09:02.165 --> 0:09:04.885
<v Speaker 2>to be so that I can strive for it. Who's

0:09:04.885 --> 0:09:06.525
<v Speaker 2>on the top of the leader board? Secure?

0:09:07.045 --> 0:09:12.405
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So with secure attachment, you are emotionally safe, you

0:09:12.525 --> 0:09:16.285
<v Speaker 1>have interdependence with your partner. So you know, I can

0:09:16.325 --> 0:09:20.325
<v Speaker 1>depend on me and I can depend on you. I'm

0:09:20.365 --> 0:09:23.485
<v Speaker 1>able to self soothe, and I can also ask you

0:09:23.965 --> 0:09:27.285
<v Speaker 1>to help regulate my emotions. I have both available to me.

0:09:27.805 --> 0:09:33.045
<v Speaker 2>Interdependence as opposed to codependence.

0:09:32.365 --> 0:09:35.925
<v Speaker 1>Yes, as opposed to codependence and hyper independence.

0:09:36.325 --> 0:09:39.765
<v Speaker 2>Codependence means that you can't live without the other person, right.

0:09:39.885 --> 0:09:41.965
<v Speaker 1>Right, That's where we see a lot of folks with

0:09:42.085 --> 0:09:47.205
<v Speaker 1>anxious attachment are susceptible to codependence. You're too needy, Yes,

0:09:47.405 --> 0:09:52.165
<v Speaker 1>you are prioritizing not being abandoned over your own needs.

0:09:52.725 --> 0:09:55.285
<v Speaker 2>Is this just about romantic relationships or it's about all

0:09:55.325 --> 0:09:58.805
<v Speaker 2>your relationships with friends, with family?

0:09:59.325 --> 0:10:01.925
<v Speaker 1>It can be about all all your relationships, all of

0:10:01.925 --> 0:10:05.205
<v Speaker 1>your relationships. Absolutely, Okay, yeah.

0:10:04.805 --> 0:10:08.365
<v Speaker 2>So whatever style you have, it usually applies to how

0:10:08.405 --> 0:10:11.165
<v Speaker 2>you interrel with everybody in your life. Is that right?

0:10:11.525 --> 0:10:15.565
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely? I will say this though, It's very common for

0:10:15.725 --> 0:10:19.765
<v Speaker 1>people to have secure attachment with their friends and even

0:10:19.805 --> 0:10:24.685
<v Speaker 1>their family, and not in their romantic relationships. So it's

0:10:24.725 --> 0:10:27.445
<v Speaker 1>normal that you would have different attachment styles based on

0:10:27.805 --> 0:10:29.045
<v Speaker 1>the type of relationship.

0:10:29.085 --> 0:10:33.245
<v Speaker 2>It is so anxious attachment, let's talk about that, and

0:10:33.325 --> 0:10:36.685
<v Speaker 2>let's keep to romantic relationships because I think for the

0:10:36.685 --> 0:10:40.845
<v Speaker 2>purposes of this conversation, let's try and understand out patterns

0:10:40.845 --> 0:10:43.885
<v Speaker 2>in romantic relationships. What's anxious attachment.

0:10:44.365 --> 0:10:48.365
<v Speaker 1>Anxious attachment at the core is where you are devaluing

0:10:48.405 --> 0:10:52.805
<v Speaker 1>yourself and you are overvaluing the other person, so you

0:10:53.165 --> 0:10:57.725
<v Speaker 1>are disconnected from self and you are very aware of

0:10:57.725 --> 0:11:02.245
<v Speaker 1>the other person's needs. And with anxious attachment, I like

0:11:02.285 --> 0:11:06.405
<v Speaker 1>to tell people it's like your reassurance bucket has holes

0:11:06.445 --> 0:11:09.125
<v Speaker 1>in it. So what I mean by that is we

0:11:09.165 --> 0:11:13.645
<v Speaker 1>all need reassurance to feel secure in a relationship. But

0:11:13.725 --> 0:11:16.845
<v Speaker 1>if you have anxious attachment, no matter how much reassurance

0:11:16.885 --> 0:11:20.005
<v Speaker 1>you're given, it's really hard for you to internalize it.

0:11:20.645 --> 0:11:22.885
<v Speaker 1>You could have a partner say I love you, You're

0:11:22.965 --> 0:11:26.005
<v Speaker 1>my everything. I'm never going to leave you, and then

0:11:26.285 --> 0:11:28.765
<v Speaker 1>you still might want to ask, are you sure you

0:11:28.805 --> 0:11:31.245
<v Speaker 1>love me? The reassurance is.

0:11:31.245 --> 0:11:33.925
<v Speaker 2>Not landing avoidant attachment.

0:11:34.285 --> 0:11:37.765
<v Speaker 1>This is where you're actually overvaluing yourself and you might

0:11:37.805 --> 0:11:42.405
<v Speaker 1>find yourself devaluing others and there's a lot of unconscious

0:11:42.605 --> 0:11:47.405
<v Speaker 1>distancing that's happening where you're pulling away, and this can

0:11:47.445 --> 0:11:53.565
<v Speaker 1>look like not responding to text messages, avoiding conflict. Even

0:11:53.845 --> 0:11:56.085
<v Speaker 1>those people who are very sarcastic, and they might be

0:11:56.125 --> 0:11:59.085
<v Speaker 1>putting you down in kind of a sarcastic way. That

0:11:59.125 --> 0:12:02.125
<v Speaker 1>can be an avoidant attachment strategy as a way to

0:12:02.205 --> 0:12:06.485
<v Speaker 1>distance themselves from you. With avoidant attachment, you have to

0:12:06.525 --> 0:12:11.725
<v Speaker 1>realize that there's a real difficulty with connecting to their emotions.

0:12:12.365 --> 0:12:14.645
<v Speaker 1>So then of course they struggle with connecting to the

0:12:14.685 --> 0:12:18.685
<v Speaker 1>emotions of others because they're disconnected from their own emotions.

0:12:19.205 --> 0:12:23.845
<v Speaker 2>The fourth attachment style is interesting disorganized. What does that mean?

0:12:24.325 --> 0:12:29.205
<v Speaker 1>Disorganized attachment is the combination of anxious and avoidant happening

0:12:29.245 --> 0:12:30.285
<v Speaker 1>at the same time.

0:12:30.885 --> 0:12:32.245
<v Speaker 2>Oh, how does that manifest?

0:12:32.845 --> 0:12:37.845
<v Speaker 1>So this is that push pull dynamic. Never leave me, now,

0:12:37.885 --> 0:12:38.605
<v Speaker 1>get away from me.

0:12:41.885 --> 0:12:46.565
<v Speaker 2>That sounds familiar in a moment. Now that we know

0:12:46.605 --> 0:12:49.805
<v Speaker 2>what the four attachment styles are, what do we do

0:12:49.925 --> 0:12:52.605
<v Speaker 2>with that information? And how do we figure out which

0:12:52.685 --> 0:12:58.005
<v Speaker 2>one we are? We'll be right back. Can you be

0:12:58.125 --> 0:13:01.845
<v Speaker 2>a combination of more than one attachment style? Or do

0:13:01.885 --> 0:13:04.805
<v Speaker 2>we tend to fall mostly in one of those four buckets?

0:13:05.165 --> 0:13:08.765
<v Speaker 1>Most people will have a style that they find themselves

0:13:08.845 --> 0:13:11.845
<v Speaker 1>being in the majority of the time. I think it's

0:13:11.885 --> 0:13:15.045
<v Speaker 1>important to ask yourself that of Okay, where am I

0:13:15.245 --> 0:13:18.205
<v Speaker 1>most of the time. The important thing to realize about

0:13:18.325 --> 0:13:22.765
<v Speaker 1>disorganized attachment is once again that anxious and avoidant are

0:13:22.845 --> 0:13:27.405
<v Speaker 1>happening simultaneously. So it's not that you just have both

0:13:27.445 --> 0:13:30.605
<v Speaker 1>anxious and avoidant strategies, is that they're actually happening at

0:13:30.645 --> 0:13:31.365
<v Speaker 1>the same time.

0:13:31.645 --> 0:13:33.765
<v Speaker 2>That must feel very confusing and uncomfortable.

0:13:34.205 --> 0:13:38.885
<v Speaker 1>It's very chaotic. It's about five to seven percent of

0:13:38.925 --> 0:13:45.125
<v Speaker 1>the population highly correlated with childhood trauma, oftentimes misdiagnosed as

0:13:45.165 --> 0:13:50.525
<v Speaker 1>borderline personality disorder. I think people with disorganized attachment they

0:13:50.565 --> 0:13:53.405
<v Speaker 1>often feel a lot of pain in their relationships.

0:13:54.045 --> 0:13:56.805
<v Speaker 2>Is your attachment style fixed for life or can you change?

0:13:57.285 --> 0:14:01.005
<v Speaker 1>I'm so glad you asked yes, you can always become

0:14:01.045 --> 0:14:05.925
<v Speaker 1>securely attached. Really yes, The old research said no, which

0:14:06.125 --> 0:14:09.125
<v Speaker 1>was actually what motivated me to write a book because

0:14:09.165 --> 0:14:12.165
<v Speaker 1>I was very annoyed about that. We have tons of

0:14:12.285 --> 0:14:16.125
<v Speaker 1>data now that you can rewire your brain and change

0:14:16.125 --> 0:14:20.005
<v Speaker 1>your nervous system and learn how to embody secure attachment.

0:14:20.605 --> 0:14:24.605
<v Speaker 2>So no matter how tumultuous or even traumatic your childhood was,

0:14:24.685 --> 0:14:27.925
<v Speaker 2>no matter what the patterns were that was set early

0:14:28.005 --> 0:14:31.565
<v Speaker 2>on in your life, you can change that.

0:14:32.245 --> 0:14:34.605
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely. I'm living proof of that.

0:14:35.045 --> 0:14:37.405
<v Speaker 2>I want to ask a little bit about your story,

0:14:37.485 --> 0:14:42.445
<v Speaker 2>if that's okay. Losing your mum at six. I can't

0:14:42.485 --> 0:14:46.405
<v Speaker 2>imagine how that felt. I genuinely can't imagine how that felt.

0:14:46.485 --> 0:14:50.245
<v Speaker 2>Looking back now as the woman you are to that

0:14:50.285 --> 0:14:53.725
<v Speaker 2>little girl, how did it play out for her? Because

0:14:53.765 --> 0:14:57.285
<v Speaker 2>I mean, abandoned doesn't even begin to cover how you

0:14:57.365 --> 0:14:58.085
<v Speaker 2>must have felt.

0:14:58.485 --> 0:15:01.885
<v Speaker 1>I've done a lot of deep work, and I really

0:15:01.965 --> 0:15:06.125
<v Speaker 1>wasn't able to talk about losing my mom until my

0:15:06.245 --> 0:15:08.685
<v Speaker 1>mid thirties. It's just one of those things. I really

0:15:08.725 --> 0:15:11.325
<v Speaker 1>had to process a lot before I could even talk

0:15:11.365 --> 0:15:14.045
<v Speaker 1>about it, and so I've thought a lot about it.

0:15:14.085 --> 0:15:17.805
<v Speaker 1>And one of the things I've done is I realized

0:15:17.845 --> 0:15:21.245
<v Speaker 1>I had a lot of abandonment beliefs that I was

0:15:21.285 --> 0:15:25.525
<v Speaker 1>abandoned by her. Even though this was it was an accident,

0:15:25.885 --> 0:15:30.325
<v Speaker 1>it was a totally random thing. I had internalized that

0:15:30.485 --> 0:15:32.605
<v Speaker 1>there was something wrong with me and that I was

0:15:32.645 --> 0:15:36.045
<v Speaker 1>abandoned because there was something wrong with me. So it

0:15:36.085 --> 0:15:40.245
<v Speaker 1>took me years of processing and deep work to even

0:15:40.325 --> 0:15:44.605
<v Speaker 1>get to that level of realization. But once I did,

0:15:45.445 --> 0:15:48.045
<v Speaker 1>I let go of so much and I do a

0:15:48.045 --> 0:15:50.205
<v Speaker 1>lot of spiritual work. I don't know where you are

0:15:50.285 --> 0:15:51.445
<v Speaker 1>on the wo woo oh.

0:15:51.485 --> 0:15:55.365
<v Speaker 2>I like, I'm a combo of science and woo woo.

0:15:55.125 --> 0:15:58.085
<v Speaker 1>The same same. So I do a lot of breath

0:15:58.085 --> 0:16:01.325
<v Speaker 1>work and I've had some breathwork experiences where i feel

0:16:01.325 --> 0:16:05.405
<v Speaker 1>that I've connected with my mom's energy. And one of

0:16:05.445 --> 0:16:07.365
<v Speaker 1>the messages that she had and I'm going to get

0:16:07.365 --> 0:16:09.805
<v Speaker 1>emotional talking about this, but the message that she had

0:16:09.845 --> 0:16:12.445
<v Speaker 1>for me was I never left you. I've always been there.

0:16:14.845 --> 0:16:19.685
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. That's incredibly beautiful and important because the feeling of

0:16:19.725 --> 0:16:23.965
<v Speaker 2>abandonment can exist whether someone actually abandoned you or not.

0:16:24.125 --> 0:16:26.205
<v Speaker 2>Like she didn't abandon you, clearly, it's not like she

0:16:26.325 --> 0:16:29.365
<v Speaker 2>left you. It's not like she wanted to be apart

0:16:29.405 --> 0:16:31.485
<v Speaker 2>from you. It was an accident, it was random, it

0:16:31.565 --> 0:16:34.285
<v Speaker 2>was out of her control. She never would have chosen that.

0:16:34.845 --> 0:16:38.005
<v Speaker 2>But the fact that you felt abandoned isn't any less

0:16:38.045 --> 0:16:42.125
<v Speaker 2>real just because she didn't want it right right exactly.

0:16:42.645 --> 0:16:46.045
<v Speaker 2>So how do you feel that, because that must have

0:16:46.205 --> 0:16:48.445
<v Speaker 2>even though I'm sure you couldn't have articulated at at

0:16:48.485 --> 0:16:53.245
<v Speaker 2>age six, how did that impact on the people that

0:16:53.285 --> 0:16:55.805
<v Speaker 2>you chose and your relationships, even with your dad at

0:16:55.805 --> 0:16:56.245
<v Speaker 2>that time.

0:16:56.725 --> 0:16:59.725
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and my dad. You know, I've worked a lot

0:16:59.765 --> 0:17:03.285
<v Speaker 1>on my relationship with him. He didn't really have a

0:17:03.365 --> 0:17:08.165
<v Speaker 1>great childhood, he didn't have models for emotional availability. My

0:17:08.285 --> 0:17:12.525
<v Speaker 1>dad really threw himself into work, so he was working NonStop.

0:17:12.965 --> 0:17:15.885
<v Speaker 1>And I think what I learned during that time of

0:17:15.925 --> 0:17:18.685
<v Speaker 1>my life, which is I honestly dissociated a lot. So

0:17:18.765 --> 0:17:21.725
<v Speaker 1>I have very few memories from age six to fifteen,

0:17:22.445 --> 0:17:25.645
<v Speaker 1>but during that time, I just remember trying to make

0:17:25.685 --> 0:17:29.285
<v Speaker 1>myself as small as possible, and not wanting to take

0:17:29.365 --> 0:17:32.125
<v Speaker 1>up space, and not wanting to be a burden, and

0:17:32.245 --> 0:17:34.805
<v Speaker 1>just trying to be a good kid and be a

0:17:34.845 --> 0:17:37.605
<v Speaker 1>good student. And I really felt that if I had

0:17:37.645 --> 0:17:42.165
<v Speaker 1>emotions that it would be an inconvenience. I really disconnected

0:17:42.365 --> 0:17:46.325
<v Speaker 1>from my inner experience. I think it was just so

0:17:46.405 --> 0:17:48.845
<v Speaker 1>hard for me to process what had happened that I

0:17:48.965 --> 0:17:51.645
<v Speaker 1>just cut off from my emotions and I decided to achieve,

0:17:52.325 --> 0:17:55.805
<v Speaker 1>which so many of us do. And it wasn't intel

0:17:55.885 --> 0:17:58.965
<v Speaker 1>doing this work after getting out of the relationship with

0:17:59.045 --> 0:18:03.685
<v Speaker 1>the narcissists that I realized, Oh, I've been completely disconnected

0:18:03.725 --> 0:18:09.045
<v Speaker 1>from my internal experience. I've lost all of my self trust.

0:18:09.325 --> 0:18:12.885
<v Speaker 1>I don't even know what I'm feeling. I can't express

0:18:12.925 --> 0:18:16.405
<v Speaker 1>what I'm feeling, and I just keep attracting people that

0:18:16.485 --> 0:18:19.685
<v Speaker 1>take up all the space and people that I have

0:18:19.765 --> 0:18:23.405
<v Speaker 1>to care for. I was always much more comfortable care

0:18:23.605 --> 0:18:28.805
<v Speaker 1>taking for others than taking up space. Even my journey

0:18:28.805 --> 0:18:32.205
<v Speaker 1>of realizing why did I choose clinical psychology, it was

0:18:32.245 --> 0:18:34.525
<v Speaker 1>a natural thing for me to do, was just to

0:18:34.645 --> 0:18:38.685
<v Speaker 1>let other people take up space and caretake. So I've

0:18:38.725 --> 0:18:43.725
<v Speaker 1>had this whole realization of really healing myself and my

0:18:43.805 --> 0:18:47.965
<v Speaker 1>beliefs about my emotions and my worthiness of expressing what

0:18:48.005 --> 0:18:50.805
<v Speaker 1>I feel and I can say. In my thirties. This

0:18:50.845 --> 0:18:52.925
<v Speaker 1>has been such a great decade because I know that

0:18:53.045 --> 0:18:57.085
<v Speaker 1>I'm taking up space, I'm connected to my emotions, I'm

0:18:57.125 --> 0:19:00.845
<v Speaker 1>setting boundaries all those things that that little girl, How

0:19:00.885 --> 0:19:02.605
<v Speaker 1>do I say this? I was in survival mode. I

0:19:02.645 --> 0:19:05.925
<v Speaker 1>was in fight or flight mode, so I wasn't even

0:19:05.965 --> 0:19:07.965
<v Speaker 1>aware of what I was feeling or needing.

0:19:08.245 --> 0:19:10.045
<v Speaker 2>You must have been terrified that your dad was going

0:19:10.125 --> 0:19:10.445
<v Speaker 2>to die?

0:19:11.125 --> 0:19:14.805
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think I was. I also have aunts. I

0:19:14.805 --> 0:19:18.365
<v Speaker 1>have amazing aunts, my mom's sisters, and I know there

0:19:18.445 --> 0:19:21.565
<v Speaker 1>was some of that in my relationship with them as well.

0:19:21.845 --> 0:19:25.485
<v Speaker 2>Being very fearful, I guess, and not trusting that people

0:19:25.525 --> 0:19:26.365
<v Speaker 2>would stick around.

0:19:27.085 --> 0:19:31.125
<v Speaker 1>Yes, we had dogs. We had three dogs, and there

0:19:31.165 --> 0:19:32.525
<v Speaker 1>was a lot of chaos. As I said, in my

0:19:32.565 --> 0:19:35.405
<v Speaker 1>family were moving around a lot, and these were dogs

0:19:35.445 --> 0:19:37.485
<v Speaker 1>that my mom had picked out. They'd been part of

0:19:37.525 --> 0:19:40.845
<v Speaker 1>our family, and when we moved at one point my

0:19:40.965 --> 0:19:45.805
<v Speaker 1>dad gave away the dogs, one of the only constants

0:19:45.845 --> 0:19:48.965
<v Speaker 1>in my life. And not only did he give them away,

0:19:49.045 --> 0:19:52.725
<v Speaker 1>he had us go to the families and give the

0:19:52.765 --> 0:19:57.285
<v Speaker 1>dogs to the families. And as you can imagine, that

0:19:57.445 --> 0:19:59.565
<v Speaker 1>was incredibly painful for me.

0:20:00.045 --> 0:20:03.365
<v Speaker 2>Do you have siblings. I have a twin sister, okay,

0:20:03.765 --> 0:20:07.005
<v Speaker 2>which brings me to my next question. Can you have

0:20:07.165 --> 0:20:10.165
<v Speaker 2>children who grow up in the same facts, so the

0:20:10.205 --> 0:20:13.085
<v Speaker 2>same nurture, but have different attachment styles.

0:20:13.445 --> 0:20:17.005
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely, my sister and I are a wonderful case study

0:20:17.045 --> 0:20:21.485
<v Speaker 1>of this. Yes, you can have similar experiences in childhood

0:20:22.285 --> 0:20:26.125
<v Speaker 1>and develop completely different attachment styles based on how you're

0:20:26.205 --> 0:20:28.485
<v Speaker 1>coping with the attachment wounds.

0:20:28.885 --> 0:20:29.845
<v Speaker 2>Speak more about that.

0:20:30.365 --> 0:20:33.805
<v Speaker 1>So, if you have a child where the parent is

0:20:34.005 --> 0:20:38.525
<v Speaker 1>emotionally unavailable, maybe one of the children learns, okay, I

0:20:38.605 --> 0:20:42.285
<v Speaker 1>need to be hyper independent. So they're developing the avoidant

0:20:42.285 --> 0:20:46.045
<v Speaker 1>attachment style where they're disconnected and they want to achieve

0:20:46.205 --> 0:20:50.925
<v Speaker 1>and be independent, whereas the other child may develop anxious attachment.

0:20:51.605 --> 0:20:55.325
<v Speaker 1>I need reassurance. I'm asking for a lot. I come

0:20:55.365 --> 0:21:00.965
<v Speaker 1>across as needy, and it's same experience, two different ways

0:21:01.005 --> 0:21:02.685
<v Speaker 1>of responding and coping.

0:21:03.165 --> 0:21:05.725
<v Speaker 2>Did your twin and you share an attachment style?

0:21:06.045 --> 0:21:10.645
<v Speaker 1>I would say she was definitely way more of attached

0:21:10.925 --> 0:21:11.205
<v Speaker 1>then me.

0:21:11.605 --> 0:21:14.645
<v Speaker 2>I would have thought that it's funny with twins because

0:21:14.685 --> 0:21:17.365
<v Speaker 2>you would always be there for each other, right, So

0:21:17.485 --> 0:21:21.445
<v Speaker 2>I would have assumed that twins have a secure attachment style,

0:21:21.445 --> 0:21:23.885
<v Speaker 2>I guess, because there's always someone there that you can

0:21:23.925 --> 0:21:25.805
<v Speaker 2>rely on. But one of my closest friends is a

0:21:25.845 --> 0:21:30.485
<v Speaker 2>twin and she has an anxious attachment style as well.

0:21:30.925 --> 0:21:34.525
<v Speaker 1>And one thing to really think about is when we're developing,

0:21:35.245 --> 0:21:38.805
<v Speaker 1>whether it's early on with our parents or in our teens, whenever,

0:21:39.245 --> 0:21:43.605
<v Speaker 1>if we don't have that secure figure, that person that

0:21:43.725 --> 0:21:47.765
<v Speaker 1>is showing up, that's validating our emotions, that's really making

0:21:47.845 --> 0:21:51.005
<v Speaker 1>us feel seen and heard and validated. If we don't

0:21:51.045 --> 0:21:54.125
<v Speaker 1>have that, then we're not learning how to do that

0:21:54.245 --> 0:21:57.325
<v Speaker 1>for ourselves, and we're not learning how to do that

0:21:57.405 --> 0:22:00.445
<v Speaker 1>for others. So my sister and I didn't really have

0:22:00.525 --> 0:22:04.045
<v Speaker 1>adults that were modeling that for us, So we didn't

0:22:04.085 --> 0:22:05.845
<v Speaker 1>learn how to do it for ourselves, and we certainly

0:22:05.925 --> 0:22:08.965
<v Speaker 1>we actually fought. We actually had a horrible relationship all

0:22:09.005 --> 0:22:13.565
<v Speaker 1>through out my childhood and into high school. And now

0:22:13.605 --> 0:22:17.045
<v Speaker 1>we're best friends. That's wonderful how that's worked out. But

0:22:17.125 --> 0:22:20.005
<v Speaker 1>we had experienced so much trauma that we really couldn't

0:22:20.005 --> 0:22:21.205
<v Speaker 1>be there for each other.

0:22:23.125 --> 0:22:26.605
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So then why if we have abandonment issues would

0:22:26.645 --> 0:22:30.965
<v Speaker 2>we find avoidant partners? How does that whole attraction thing

0:22:31.085 --> 0:22:34.845
<v Speaker 2>work depending on our attachment style? More with doctor Morgan

0:22:34.885 --> 0:22:40.245
<v Speaker 2>Andison after this short break. People who don't kind of

0:22:40.525 --> 0:22:44.365
<v Speaker 2>understand how this works. And I suppose logically you would think, well,

0:22:44.845 --> 0:22:49.765
<v Speaker 2>if you'd have had issues around abandonment, surely you would

0:22:50.285 --> 0:22:53.365
<v Speaker 2>look for a partner who was very present, who was

0:22:53.925 --> 0:22:58.445
<v Speaker 2>able to meet your needs. But often we repeat whatever

0:22:58.485 --> 0:23:01.285
<v Speaker 2>it is that's traumatized us in our childhood, is that

0:23:01.285 --> 0:23:03.965
<v Speaker 2>because it feels familiar and it's our default.

0:23:04.325 --> 0:23:07.165
<v Speaker 1>I was so glad you were asking me about this. Yes,

0:23:07.765 --> 0:23:12.485
<v Speaker 1>it's because it feels from it's our emotional home. And

0:23:12.645 --> 0:23:17.245
<v Speaker 1>I would add that there's this thing called repetition compulsion.

0:23:17.485 --> 0:23:19.045
<v Speaker 1>Have you heard that term? No?

0:23:19.765 --> 0:23:22.165
<v Speaker 2>Okay, but I think I can relate to it already,

0:23:22.205 --> 0:23:23.965
<v Speaker 2>even without having heard it before.

0:23:25.365 --> 0:23:32.765
<v Speaker 1>With repetition compulsion, we're repeating our same relational dynamics unconsciously.

0:23:33.085 --> 0:23:35.445
<v Speaker 1>It's not as if you're intentionally saying, oh, let me

0:23:35.565 --> 0:23:39.965
<v Speaker 1>find this emotionally unavailable person again. You're repeating it unconsciously.

0:23:40.645 --> 0:23:45.685
<v Speaker 1>But there's the unconscious wish that this time you would

0:23:45.805 --> 0:23:49.525
<v Speaker 1>have a different result, And your brain goes, if I

0:23:49.565 --> 0:23:51.925
<v Speaker 1>can get this person to love me this time, it's

0:23:51.925 --> 0:23:55.045
<v Speaker 1>going to make up for everything I experienced in the past.

0:23:55.405 --> 0:23:56.885
<v Speaker 2>I bet it never happens.

0:23:57.405 --> 0:24:01.725
<v Speaker 1>No, And it ends the same way insanity is, you know,

0:24:01.845 --> 0:24:03.925
<v Speaker 1>doing the same thing over and over again, expecting a

0:24:03.925 --> 0:24:08.765
<v Speaker 1>different result. So we have these re woundings and then

0:24:08.805 --> 0:24:11.725
<v Speaker 1>we're just absolutely devastated each time.

0:24:12.165 --> 0:24:15.245
<v Speaker 2>So each time you were rejected in a romantic relationship

0:24:15.325 --> 0:24:19.205
<v Speaker 2>or abandoned, even if it was emotionally abandoned, it harked

0:24:19.285 --> 0:24:23.365
<v Speaker 2>back to that original abandonment. Yes, and so it amplified it.

0:24:23.485 --> 0:24:27.845
<v Speaker 2>Do we then overreact to something that seems quite small

0:24:28.045 --> 0:24:32.925
<v Speaker 2>but that triggers all of those memories of being abandoned

0:24:32.925 --> 0:24:33.445
<v Speaker 2>in the past.

0:24:33.965 --> 0:24:39.085
<v Speaker 1>Yes. I always know my clients who have insecure styles,

0:24:39.125 --> 0:24:41.805
<v Speaker 1>because you know, we can talk about a breakup can

0:24:41.885 --> 0:24:45.285
<v Speaker 1>really feel like dying because of how painful it is,

0:24:45.885 --> 0:24:48.605
<v Speaker 1>And you're going, man, my friends still seem to have

0:24:48.765 --> 0:24:52.485
<v Speaker 1>this difficult of a time when they're experiencing breakups. What's

0:24:52.645 --> 0:24:55.365
<v Speaker 1>wrong with me? And I can tell you it's because

0:24:55.405 --> 0:24:59.525
<v Speaker 1>of your unresolved trauma from the past and repetition compulsion.

0:24:59.965 --> 0:25:03.725
<v Speaker 2>How do you resolve that trauma like you can't unloose

0:25:03.765 --> 0:25:08.165
<v Speaker 2>your mother? How is that not an absolute permanent scar

0:25:08.365 --> 0:25:09.125
<v Speaker 2>in your psyche?

0:25:09.565 --> 0:25:12.085
<v Speaker 1>That's such a good question. One of the things I

0:25:12.205 --> 0:25:16.765
<v Speaker 1>find is that when we become aware of this and

0:25:16.805 --> 0:25:19.205
<v Speaker 1>we know that it's happening, and when we go back

0:25:19.245 --> 0:25:23.485
<v Speaker 1>to the original wounding and we process it from our

0:25:23.605 --> 0:25:29.165
<v Speaker 1>healthy adult, securely attached selves, that we're able to release

0:25:29.685 --> 0:25:34.365
<v Speaker 1>a lot of that unfinished business. And then in our

0:25:34.405 --> 0:25:37.405
<v Speaker 1>present day we're no longer attracted to those same types

0:25:37.445 --> 0:25:42.085
<v Speaker 1>of people, We're no longer seeking to recreate the wounds.

0:25:42.965 --> 0:25:45.965
<v Speaker 1>That's really the focus is going back to that core wounding,

0:25:46.085 --> 0:25:48.965
<v Speaker 1>processing it from that emotionally healthy adult.

0:25:48.965 --> 0:25:51.285
<v Speaker 2>So you can go back and go I know it

0:25:51.325 --> 0:25:54.925
<v Speaker 2>felt like she left because I was unlovable, but actually

0:25:55.005 --> 0:25:57.565
<v Speaker 2>it was just a random accident and that's not what

0:25:57.685 --> 0:26:01.125
<v Speaker 2>she wanted, and I wasn't unlovable, And so even by

0:26:01.165 --> 0:26:05.125
<v Speaker 2>taking that adult perspective and overlaying it on that childhood experience,

0:26:05.725 --> 0:26:07.925
<v Speaker 2>you can heal it. Is that how you heal it?

0:26:08.205 --> 0:26:12.285
<v Speaker 1>Yes, And of course there's always loss and grief, and

0:26:12.325 --> 0:26:14.925
<v Speaker 1>it's not to say that we don't experience grief. I

0:26:14.925 --> 0:26:18.085
<v Speaker 1>think it's really important anybody listening who's lost a parent,

0:26:18.205 --> 0:26:21.965
<v Speaker 1>you know that it's simply part of you. And I

0:26:22.005 --> 0:26:24.725
<v Speaker 1>would say the powerful thing though, is examining what's the

0:26:24.845 --> 0:26:27.285
<v Speaker 1>narrative that we have, what's the story that we're telling

0:26:27.285 --> 0:26:30.045
<v Speaker 1>about it, And a lot of my spiritual work of

0:26:30.485 --> 0:26:33.765
<v Speaker 1>doing my breath work and connecting with the energy spirit

0:26:33.845 --> 0:26:37.605
<v Speaker 1>of my mom and I can just feel the love

0:26:37.645 --> 0:26:41.325
<v Speaker 1>from her and her telling me, oh, you were the

0:26:41.365 --> 0:26:43.885
<v Speaker 1>best part of my life. You know, were my twin girls.

0:26:43.925 --> 0:26:46.245
<v Speaker 1>I loved you, I adored you. And I think that

0:26:46.525 --> 0:26:49.965
<v Speaker 1>that spiritual work has also really helped me have a

0:26:49.965 --> 0:26:51.125
<v Speaker 1>deeper level of heeling.

0:26:51.805 --> 0:26:54.485
<v Speaker 2>What happened to you and your sister obviously was one

0:26:54.565 --> 0:26:58.525
<v Speaker 2>of the most extreme forms of trauma, but you don't

0:26:58.525 --> 0:27:03.005
<v Speaker 2>have to have experienced something that life changing or that

0:27:03.205 --> 0:27:09.125
<v Speaker 2>extreme to still have experienced trauma or abandonment in your childhood. Right,

0:27:09.325 --> 0:27:12.965
<v Speaker 2>it might be a grandparent dying, it might be pet dying,

0:27:13.045 --> 0:27:16.325
<v Speaker 2>it might be your parents getting divorced. Is that right?

0:27:16.685 --> 0:27:20.885
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely. I think sometimes we get into this place of, well,

0:27:20.925 --> 0:27:23.365
<v Speaker 1>my trauma wasn't as bad as this person, or it

0:27:23.485 --> 0:27:26.805
<v Speaker 1>really wasn't that bad, and we almost invalidate ourselves, but

0:27:27.005 --> 0:27:31.165
<v Speaker 1>realizing that anytime there's a rupture or a wounding in

0:27:31.205 --> 0:27:34.565
<v Speaker 1>the secure attachment in your life, that that does have

0:27:34.605 --> 0:27:35.445
<v Speaker 1>an impact on you.

0:27:35.925 --> 0:27:38.325
<v Speaker 2>I was one of those people who went to therapy

0:27:39.045 --> 0:27:42.285
<v Speaker 2>when I was much younger, feeling a little bit sheepish

0:27:42.365 --> 0:27:45.565
<v Speaker 2>about going to therapy even though I was going for

0:27:45.845 --> 0:27:47.645
<v Speaker 2>I think I went for the first time because I

0:27:47.645 --> 0:27:50.285
<v Speaker 2>had an eating disorder. But I was like, yeah, no,

0:27:50.365 --> 0:27:52.645
<v Speaker 2>my childhood was fine, Like my parents are still married,

0:27:52.685 --> 0:27:56.045
<v Speaker 2>No one died, you know, there wasn't any particular trauma.

0:27:56.125 --> 0:27:59.285
<v Speaker 2>But then when we sort of unpacked things, and it's

0:27:59.325 --> 0:28:02.805
<v Speaker 2>only decades later that I've understood. You know, my brother

0:28:02.845 --> 0:28:05.645
<v Speaker 2>who I dored, who was seven years older, moved overseas

0:28:05.685 --> 0:28:09.245
<v Speaker 2>for a couple of years, and my uncle who I worship,

0:28:09.765 --> 0:28:14.045
<v Speaker 2>were traveling for a year or two, and my aunt's partner.

0:28:14.685 --> 0:28:17.565
<v Speaker 2>He left and I adored him as well. So interestingly,

0:28:17.605 --> 0:28:19.765
<v Speaker 2>all these men in my life who I loved, although

0:28:19.765 --> 0:28:23.085
<v Speaker 2>not romantically, but they were like these really important figures

0:28:23.125 --> 0:28:26.805
<v Speaker 2>in my life, they all left for very good reasons.

0:28:26.925 --> 0:28:28.885
<v Speaker 2>And it's not like they died and I didn't ever

0:28:28.885 --> 0:28:34.005
<v Speaker 2>see them again. But that developed a pattern for me. Right,

0:28:34.125 --> 0:28:36.765
<v Speaker 2>So it's not even something that you would logically say, oh,

0:28:36.805 --> 0:28:39.325
<v Speaker 2>my dad's still around, I shouldn't have any abandonment is

0:28:39.325 --> 0:28:42.045
<v Speaker 2>shoes with men? So sometimes you have to dig a

0:28:42.085 --> 0:28:43.645
<v Speaker 2>little bit deeper. Is that right?

0:28:44.205 --> 0:28:47.725
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely? Absolutely? And then I get really curious about the

0:28:47.885 --> 0:28:52.005
<v Speaker 1>belief systems. Right, what are your beliefs about relationships and

0:28:52.045 --> 0:28:53.085
<v Speaker 1>beliefs about man?

0:28:53.845 --> 0:28:54.165
<v Speaker 2>Right?

0:28:54.245 --> 0:28:56.365
<v Speaker 1>And it sounds like if I was you, I might

0:28:56.405 --> 0:28:59.405
<v Speaker 1>develop the belief that man will always leave me.

0:29:00.085 --> 0:29:04.645
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Well, I mostly through my early twenties and late teens,

0:29:04.685 --> 0:29:07.205
<v Speaker 2>just chose guys who were permanently stoned.

0:29:09.045 --> 0:29:11.445
<v Speaker 1>That's a form of emotional and availability.

0:29:12.125 --> 0:29:15.885
<v Speaker 2>That's interesting, Yeah, it is. And then I got you know,

0:29:15.965 --> 0:29:18.925
<v Speaker 2>the definitive relationship of my life was an emotionally abusive

0:29:18.925 --> 0:29:22.285
<v Speaker 2>one with a narcissist and a drug addict, And so

0:29:22.525 --> 0:29:26.045
<v Speaker 2>that was the ultimate that's when I hit my rock bottom,

0:29:26.125 --> 0:29:28.085
<v Speaker 2>and the partner that I chose after that was a

0:29:28.205 --> 0:29:31.525
<v Speaker 2>very deliberate It's almost like you have to things have

0:29:31.605 --> 0:29:35.125
<v Speaker 2>to get so bad that you have to go right, Well,

0:29:35.205 --> 0:29:36.965
<v Speaker 2>I'm not doing that again.

0:29:37.605 --> 0:29:40.885
<v Speaker 1>Yes, and hopefully not everyone has to go through that,

0:29:40.925 --> 0:29:43.045
<v Speaker 1>But it sounds like you and I did, yeah, of

0:29:43.205 --> 0:29:45.525
<v Speaker 1>just really getting to that place of I cannot do

0:29:45.645 --> 0:29:48.605
<v Speaker 1>this again. But I think what you pointed out about

0:29:48.645 --> 0:29:52.165
<v Speaker 1>the addiction piece is actually really important. People don't always

0:29:52.165 --> 0:29:57.485
<v Speaker 1>associate someone who whether it's you know, marijuana, alcohol, whatever,

0:29:58.005 --> 0:30:01.805
<v Speaker 1>if you're in a relationship with a substance that's your

0:30:01.845 --> 0:30:05.005
<v Speaker 1>primary relationship, which that's what happens when you're an addict,

0:30:05.485 --> 0:30:08.525
<v Speaker 1>then you can't be emotionally available to a partner.

0:30:09.725 --> 0:30:12.805
<v Speaker 2>Interesting. Yeah, the other thing I had to learn in

0:30:12.845 --> 0:30:16.205
<v Speaker 2>therapy was to depend on people and to ask for

0:30:16.285 --> 0:30:18.845
<v Speaker 2>help because I internalized this idea that I think was

0:30:18.885 --> 0:30:23.365
<v Speaker 2>probably quite common of gen X kids, that that was

0:30:23.405 --> 0:30:27.325
<v Speaker 2>the generation where our parents were the opposite of helicopters.

0:30:27.405 --> 0:30:30.645
<v Speaker 2>It was very much about free range, like they just

0:30:30.685 --> 0:30:33.965
<v Speaker 2>got on with their lives and they didn't parent as

0:30:33.965 --> 0:30:37.165
<v Speaker 2>a verb. They were parents, but they didn't parent and

0:30:37.245 --> 0:30:41.205
<v Speaker 2>It's not that we were neglected in a malevolent way.

0:30:41.325 --> 0:30:44.045
<v Speaker 2>It was kind of benevolent neglect. We just kind of

0:30:44.165 --> 0:30:46.885
<v Speaker 2>ran off and did our own thing. And I think

0:30:46.925 --> 0:30:49.725
<v Speaker 2>that what that taught a lot of us was that

0:30:49.765 --> 0:30:52.005
<v Speaker 2>we just had to take care of ourselves and that

0:30:52.045 --> 0:30:54.725
<v Speaker 2>we couldn't depend on anyone else. Do you see that

0:30:54.765 --> 0:30:55.845
<v Speaker 2>in Gen X clients?

0:30:56.445 --> 0:31:01.605
<v Speaker 1>Yes, absolutely, Actually, it's fascinating when you look at the research,

0:31:02.245 --> 0:31:06.045
<v Speaker 1>avoid an attachment style is the fastest growing attachment style,

0:31:06.685 --> 0:31:08.125
<v Speaker 1>and I do think that there was a lot of

0:31:08.125 --> 0:31:12.845
<v Speaker 1>that cultural and influence of hyper independence being sort of

0:31:12.845 --> 0:31:16.405
<v Speaker 1>the goal of how we're supposed to be. Yeah, Unfortunately,

0:31:16.525 --> 0:31:18.925
<v Speaker 1>social media and just the age that we're in of

0:31:19.045 --> 0:31:21.805
<v Speaker 1>I call it pseudo connection for that term, we're not

0:31:21.845 --> 0:31:25.685
<v Speaker 1>really deeply connecting like we used to do. It's really

0:31:25.805 --> 0:31:29.525
<v Speaker 1>leading to more of that hyper independence. I'm an island,

0:31:30.405 --> 0:31:33.965
<v Speaker 1>I'm you know, my own person, and I can't depend

0:31:34.045 --> 0:31:37.365
<v Speaker 1>on others. There's just such an increase of that really

0:31:37.405 --> 0:31:38.685
<v Speaker 1>in our world.

0:31:39.125 --> 0:31:43.325
<v Speaker 2>Are there patterns for different ages like the gen z's,

0:31:43.325 --> 0:31:48.365
<v Speaker 2>millennials and X's have generally similar attachment styles or is

0:31:48.405 --> 0:31:49.325
<v Speaker 2>it very individual?

0:31:49.805 --> 0:31:52.925
<v Speaker 1>That's a great question. I think the research I looked

0:31:52.925 --> 0:31:55.205
<v Speaker 1>at I can really speak to gen Z and that's

0:31:55.245 --> 0:31:58.085
<v Speaker 1>where they were seeing a lot of an increase in

0:31:58.125 --> 0:31:59.445
<v Speaker 1>avoidant attachment style.

0:31:59.885 --> 0:32:04.765
<v Speaker 2>That's really interesting because parenting now has become so much

0:32:04.845 --> 0:32:08.125
<v Speaker 2>about helicoptering. You know, Glenn Doyle talks about the memo

0:32:08.245 --> 0:32:11.285
<v Speaker 2>that every generation of parents gets given at the hospital

0:32:11.325 --> 0:32:13.885
<v Speaker 2>about you know, gen X's parents were like, you know,

0:32:14.005 --> 0:32:16.525
<v Speaker 2>here's a kid, go off, have your life, you know,

0:32:16.685 --> 0:32:18.645
<v Speaker 2>make sure you feed in water them and love them.

0:32:19.165 --> 0:32:22.445
<v Speaker 2>But the memo that we got as parents is do

0:32:22.565 --> 0:32:25.605
<v Speaker 2>not let this baby ever have a negative experience or

0:32:25.645 --> 0:32:28.485
<v Speaker 2>a negative emotion. You must clear every obstacle in their path.

0:32:29.205 --> 0:32:32.125
<v Speaker 2>It's like the opposite of abandonment, right. It almost breeds

0:32:32.485 --> 0:32:37.405
<v Speaker 2>a codependence. What attachment style is that likely to create?

0:32:37.845 --> 0:32:42.885
<v Speaker 1>So that can lead to both avoidant attachment or anxious attachment,

0:32:43.765 --> 0:32:46.685
<v Speaker 1>And I think we don't always associate it with avoidant attachment,

0:32:46.765 --> 0:32:49.085
<v Speaker 1>but think about it this way. If you have that

0:32:49.165 --> 0:32:53.925
<v Speaker 1>feeling of wow, this person is intrusive, right, being sort

0:32:53.965 --> 0:32:57.205
<v Speaker 1>of almost taken over, then that that teaches you that

0:32:57.245 --> 0:33:01.525
<v Speaker 1>intimacy does not feel good. So avoidant attachment can be

0:33:01.605 --> 0:33:06.365
<v Speaker 1>sort of a rebellion to helicopter parenting of Okay, I'm

0:33:06.365 --> 0:33:08.805
<v Speaker 1>going to go be an island because intimacy does not

0:33:08.845 --> 0:33:09.285
<v Speaker 1>feel seen.

0:33:10.325 --> 0:33:13.405
<v Speaker 2>Are you learning so much? I am learning so much.

0:33:13.445 --> 0:33:16.445
<v Speaker 2>So much is making sense to me about my past,

0:33:17.045 --> 0:33:21.045
<v Speaker 2>about my present, and not just my romantic relationships, but

0:33:21.125 --> 0:33:24.045
<v Speaker 2>friendships and other relationships as well. And I guess I

0:33:24.085 --> 0:33:29.365
<v Speaker 2>never really understood the difference between interdependency and codependency the

0:33:29.405 --> 0:33:33.085
<v Speaker 2>way she explained it so clearly. That was actually amazing,

0:33:33.165 --> 0:33:36.965
<v Speaker 2>particularly for those of us who were consider ourselves really independent.

0:33:37.885 --> 0:33:41.605
<v Speaker 2>Repetition compulsion is another really useful term that I had

0:33:41.645 --> 0:33:45.565
<v Speaker 2>never heard of before. That really helped me understand why

0:33:45.645 --> 0:33:48.005
<v Speaker 2>so many of us seek out relationships that trigger us

0:33:48.405 --> 0:33:51.605
<v Speaker 2>instead of healers and makes a lot of sense. I

0:33:51.645 --> 0:33:55.965
<v Speaker 2>had a ton more questions for Dr Morgan, including the

0:33:56.005 --> 0:33:58.965
<v Speaker 2>science of the ick. I wanted to understand how attachment

0:33:59.005 --> 0:34:02.325
<v Speaker 2>theory plays into the ick and what are five things

0:34:02.645 --> 0:34:05.765
<v Speaker 2>that she would never allow in a relationship again, And

0:34:05.805 --> 0:34:09.645
<v Speaker 2>also I wanted to understand about sex and desire because

0:34:09.645 --> 0:34:11.445
<v Speaker 2>she's got a lot to say about that. That's all

0:34:11.445 --> 0:34:14.205
<v Speaker 2>in Part two. I'll meet you there. There's a link

0:34:14.285 --> 0:34:15.125
<v Speaker 2>in the show notes