WEBVTT - Scarlett "Definitely Not AI" Johansson

0:00:11.189 --> 0:00:13.909
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to a MoMA Mia podcast.

0:00:14.829 --> 0:00:17.909
<v Speaker 2>Mom and Maya acknowledges the traditional owners of land and

0:00:17.949 --> 0:00:29.989
<v Speaker 2>waters that this podcast is recorded on Hello, and welcome

0:00:30.029 --> 0:00:33.389
<v Speaker 2>to Cancel, the podcast that looks at silly celebrity crimes

0:00:33.389 --> 0:00:35.869
<v Speaker 2>and as science charges and sentences to them so that

0:00:35.909 --> 0:00:38.269
<v Speaker 2>we can all move on with our lives. I'm Jesse

0:00:38.389 --> 0:00:41.629
<v Speaker 2>Stevens and I'm joined by Claire Stephens. And Claire, would

0:00:41.629 --> 0:00:43.629
<v Speaker 2>you like to present to us a lazy girl story

0:00:43.629 --> 0:00:47.189
<v Speaker 2>for today? I would like to do that, yes, okay.

0:00:47.309 --> 0:00:50.829
<v Speaker 2>So we have an email from India, which I love

0:00:50.829 --> 0:00:53.789
<v Speaker 2>the name India too. It's beautiful, it's a gorgeous name

0:00:53.869 --> 0:00:57.109
<v Speaker 2>it is. And India said this, and I actually started

0:00:57.109 --> 0:01:00.229
<v Speaker 2>the email with my lazy girl story is this? And

0:01:00.269 --> 0:01:03.349
<v Speaker 2>then and I'm like, that's very clear and lazy. Yeah.

0:01:03.709 --> 0:01:06.949
<v Speaker 2>I had my red pea plates for nine years. Okay,

0:01:06.989 --> 0:01:10.229
<v Speaker 2>so just okay, So we're in the thematic world in

0:01:10.269 --> 0:01:14.349
<v Speaker 2>which we can both relate. I got my l's at

0:01:15.189 --> 0:01:18.269
<v Speaker 2>twenty four. Yeah. Yeah, there's something about lazy girls and

0:01:18.309 --> 0:01:21.069
<v Speaker 2>not learning to drive because it's such a long term project.

0:01:21.189 --> 0:01:25.269
<v Speaker 2>So long term project, very little happens overnight. Yeah yeah, yeah,

0:01:25.269 --> 0:01:28.349
<v Speaker 2>and it's like committing to work. So why would I

0:01:28.389 --> 0:01:30.589
<v Speaker 2>get my l's when it just like it's going to

0:01:30.629 --> 0:01:32.269
<v Speaker 2>be a long process, whether I do it tomorrow or

0:01:32.309 --> 0:01:34.709
<v Speaker 2>I do it in five years. And it's like I

0:01:34.869 --> 0:01:37.669
<v Speaker 2>just did a lesson and I still can't drive. Yeah,

0:01:37.829 --> 0:01:40.349
<v Speaker 2>so true. So she said I had my Red Pea

0:01:40.389 --> 0:01:43.069
<v Speaker 2>plates for nine years. I'm currently thirty years old. Yeah.

0:01:43.069 --> 0:01:45.749
<v Speaker 2>I got my learners when I turned sixteen. That's not

0:01:45.829 --> 0:01:48.669
<v Speaker 2>very lazy gal, and didn't get my Red Pea plates

0:01:48.749 --> 0:01:50.989
<v Speaker 2>until I was twenty because I was too lazy. Between

0:01:50.989 --> 0:01:54.589
<v Speaker 2>the ages of twenty and twenty nine, I had my

0:01:54.669 --> 0:01:58.749
<v Speaker 2>Red Pea plates. Interesting, I'm interested in the legal ramifications

0:01:58.749 --> 0:02:01.469
<v Speaker 2>of this. She touches on it. Every year. When my

0:02:01.629 --> 0:02:05.549
<v Speaker 2>red Provisional license expired, I just renew it because is

0:02:05.549 --> 0:02:08.669
<v Speaker 2>getting your greens not automatic? You have to sit just

0:02:08.709 --> 0:02:13.149
<v Speaker 2>a computer test. Yeah, so there's literally a computer exam

0:02:13.429 --> 0:02:16.789
<v Speaker 2>for your green peace. I did this mostly because I

0:02:16.869 --> 0:02:18.549
<v Speaker 2>couldn't be fucked to do the test, and I thought

0:02:18.549 --> 0:02:22.269
<v Speaker 2>it was cheaper to just renew your license sixty dollars

0:02:22.549 --> 0:02:25.309
<v Speaker 2>rather than sit the test. An upgrade to Green Provisional

0:02:25.349 --> 0:02:30.189
<v Speaker 2>license ninety dollars on the fourth year. I renewed my

0:02:30.269 --> 0:02:33.429
<v Speaker 2>red peas. I asked the lady at Services otherwise. I

0:02:33.429 --> 0:02:34.989
<v Speaker 2>was if there was a limit how many times you

0:02:35.029 --> 0:02:39.229
<v Speaker 2>can renew your red piece? Great initiative, and she said, no, Dahl,

0:02:39.309 --> 0:02:41.189
<v Speaker 2>you can be on your red peas for your whole

0:02:41.229 --> 0:02:44.709
<v Speaker 2>life if you like. It's not because I'd like, it's

0:02:44.789 --> 0:02:48.549
<v Speaker 2>just because there is a path of resistance towards the upgrade.

0:02:48.749 --> 0:02:52.029
<v Speaker 2>She finally got her green peas when she was twenty nine.

0:02:52.509 --> 0:02:56.469
<v Speaker 2>They don't expire until next year. If she decides to

0:02:56.549 --> 0:02:59.589
<v Speaker 2>get her full license next year, she will have had

0:02:59.629 --> 0:03:03.629
<v Speaker 2>her learners and provisional licenses for a total of sixteen.

0:03:05.469 --> 0:03:09.109
<v Speaker 2>She's a lazy girl. I really like this. What is

0:03:09.869 --> 0:03:12.669
<v Speaker 2>this step between green and full license? I think it's

0:03:12.749 --> 0:03:15.989
<v Speaker 2>just another computer? Oh shit, Yeah, but then you can

0:03:16.029 --> 0:03:19.149
<v Speaker 2>be on your greens indefinitely. Do you get less points

0:03:19.229 --> 0:03:23.589
<v Speaker 2>or something? Less points? You're not allowed to something something alcohol,

0:03:23.949 --> 0:03:28.389
<v Speaker 2>maybe something something insurance, maybe a little bit higher. Yeah,

0:03:28.469 --> 0:03:31.309
<v Speaker 2>but lazy girl's not going to know such information. Honestly,

0:03:31.669 --> 0:03:33.509
<v Speaker 2>I know it's not called the RTA anymore. But you

0:03:33.509 --> 0:03:35.629
<v Speaker 2>can't be changing the name and thinking lazy girls going

0:03:35.629 --> 0:03:39.189
<v Speaker 2>to keep up are a service news surface service. This

0:03:39.429 --> 0:03:43.309
<v Speaker 2>service that well, you know, sometimes it expires and we

0:03:43.349 --> 0:03:45.869
<v Speaker 2>don't know what to do. No, so I say good

0:03:45.869 --> 0:03:48.829
<v Speaker 2>on India. If I see a red pea plater, I'll

0:03:48.909 --> 0:03:51.789
<v Speaker 2>just give just a little nod of approval.

0:03:55.589 --> 0:04:00.629
<v Speaker 3>You are about to enter the canceled courtroom. The defendants

0:04:00.749 --> 0:04:07.029
<v Speaker 3>are celebrities, the chargers are petty, the rulings are final.

0:04:08.269 --> 0:04:13.829
<v Speaker 2>Clip. Today we are talking about Scarlet Ingrid Jo Hansen.

0:04:15.589 --> 0:04:18.389
<v Speaker 4>Hello, voog, I am Scarlet Rowhanson, and today I am

0:04:18.429 --> 0:04:20.909
<v Speaker 4>looking at my life Joe Prison.

0:04:22.509 --> 0:04:28.789
<v Speaker 3>Oh god, oh god, it's a baud.

0:04:29.069 --> 0:04:32.469
<v Speaker 2>I think it's Yo Hansen's spelt Joe Hansen. But then

0:04:32.509 --> 0:04:34.669
<v Speaker 2>the thing that doesn't make sense is that people say Scartough.

0:04:35.109 --> 0:04:37.069
<v Speaker 2>Yet she doesn't approve of that name. Okay, she finds

0:04:37.109 --> 0:04:40.349
<v Speaker 2>it tacky. Jo Hansen was born in nineteen eighty four

0:04:40.389 --> 0:04:43.909
<v Speaker 2>in Manhattan, and mostly she has a twin named Hunter.

0:04:44.269 --> 0:04:49.109
<v Speaker 2>Oh I this okay, good, good, good, good good good

0:04:49.229 --> 0:04:53.549
<v Speaker 2>twin brother. Let's have a look. Hunter is beautiful. Okay,

0:04:54.269 --> 0:04:59.669
<v Speaker 2>Hunt's beautiful, Clara. They identical of fraternal Obviously fraternal discuss

0:04:59.909 --> 0:05:02.589
<v Speaker 2>because you can't be identical if your boy girl twins,

0:05:02.589 --> 0:05:05.909
<v Speaker 2>because your genitals aren't saying thank you. Thank you for

0:05:05.909 --> 0:05:08.229
<v Speaker 2>clarifying that. We've been looking for a way to shoehorn

0:05:08.269 --> 0:05:12.429
<v Speaker 2>that into this podcast, because that's annoying. People say, I

0:05:12.429 --> 0:05:14.309
<v Speaker 2>have a twin brother, I have twins. You start opposite sex.

0:05:14.349 --> 0:05:16.789
<v Speaker 2>Oh you, I Dennic call it's a dumb question. All right,

0:05:17.429 --> 0:05:20.349
<v Speaker 2>it is something dumb. Now this brings us to our

0:05:20.349 --> 0:05:23.429
<v Speaker 2>favorite niche, which is celebrities you didn't know were twins.

0:05:23.789 --> 0:05:28.749
<v Speaker 2>Ashton Kutcher, any others. Uh, Elvis Presley had a twin

0:05:28.789 --> 0:05:36.029
<v Speaker 2>who died. Bring the tone down, Giselle, Oh wow, yeah,

0:05:36.429 --> 0:05:41.589
<v Speaker 2>Rammy Mallick, Oh yeah, okay, interesting. Vin Diesel. What pisses

0:05:41.629 --> 0:05:44.469
<v Speaker 2>me off is in these lists they always throwing the

0:05:44.469 --> 0:05:46.389
<v Speaker 2>Olsen twins and I'm like, this is nice. Yeah, we

0:05:46.469 --> 0:05:48.949
<v Speaker 2>knew they were twins. That's different new and they're like Mary,

0:05:49.029 --> 0:05:52.269
<v Speaker 2>Kate and Mike, let me guess Ashley, Yeah I knew

0:05:52.309 --> 0:05:55.589
<v Speaker 2>they were twins. You and Ma always say there's actually

0:05:55.589 --> 0:05:57.669
<v Speaker 2>a look you can look at someone and tell that

0:05:57.709 --> 0:06:01.549
<v Speaker 2>they're a twin. Describe there's a twin look where it goes.

0:06:01.589 --> 0:06:07.749
<v Speaker 2>I reckon, there's another you face face wise, and I

0:06:07.789 --> 0:06:12.109
<v Speaker 2>would say Vin Diesel wouldn't have guessed it, would I

0:06:12.109 --> 0:06:14.269
<v Speaker 2>wouldn't have guessed Gazelle and I wouldn't have guessed Ashton.

0:06:14.349 --> 0:06:18.749
<v Speaker 2>This is why it's an interesting story. Yeah, whereas Mary,

0:06:18.829 --> 0:06:22.789
<v Speaker 2>Kate and Ashley have twin faces. Look, I've degressed, I

0:06:22.829 --> 0:06:25.869
<v Speaker 2>have digressed. Jo Hansn't made her acting debut at nine

0:06:25.949 --> 0:06:28.589
<v Speaker 2>years old, and by ten she was playing Sean Connery's daughter.

0:06:28.869 --> 0:06:31.709
<v Speaker 2>She was a big deal. But I thought about what

0:06:31.789 --> 0:06:34.629
<v Speaker 2>we would have first seen her in any ideas. I

0:06:34.669 --> 0:06:36.709
<v Speaker 2>feel like she had a red dress and her boobs out.

0:06:36.829 --> 0:06:38.589
<v Speaker 2>She was very well. It was the premiere. It's something

0:06:38.629 --> 0:06:40.589
<v Speaker 2>we're actually going to come to that premiere because something

0:06:40.629 --> 0:06:43.709
<v Speaker 2>happened that night. But unfortunately, I do think it was

0:06:43.709 --> 0:06:51.029
<v Speaker 2>a masterpiece titled eight Legged freaksaits Oh yeah, David Arquet

0:06:51.189 --> 0:06:53.709
<v Speaker 2>in that. Yeah, she was in that. I'd like to

0:06:53.749 --> 0:06:56.749
<v Speaker 2>rewatch it. The poster has your handsome carrying a gun,

0:06:56.869 --> 0:06:59.709
<v Speaker 2>which is the most American response to a pest controllershue

0:07:00.029 --> 0:07:03.549
<v Speaker 2>I've ever seen. I found that film highly distressing. Just

0:07:03.589 --> 0:07:05.749
<v Speaker 2>to clarify, that was about spiders. Oh yep, it was

0:07:05.789 --> 0:07:08.629
<v Speaker 2>about spiders. Giant there was an issue at a power

0:07:08.669 --> 0:07:11.709
<v Speaker 2>plant and the but it's got too big and so

0:07:11.909 --> 0:07:16.669
<v Speaker 2>they descended upon a unsuspecting small town. In fact, it

0:07:16.709 --> 0:07:18.429
<v Speaker 2>was never meant to be called eight Legged Freaks, but

0:07:18.469 --> 0:07:23.509
<v Speaker 2>then David Arquette was improvising on set. Look Freeze, No,

0:07:23.709 --> 0:07:27.749
<v Speaker 2>like that's the name. More movies like eight Legged Freaks

0:07:27.789 --> 0:07:31.029
<v Speaker 2>and relatively Snakes on a Plane. Agree, Agree because it's like,

0:07:31.069 --> 0:07:34.909
<v Speaker 2>what's a fear. Let's up the snake, halp the snakes,

0:07:35.429 --> 0:07:39.789
<v Speaker 2>up the stakes, up the steaks because everyone's scared of snake. Actually,

0:07:39.909 --> 0:07:43.669
<v Speaker 2>here on a plane, everyone's scared of spider. Imagine if

0:07:43.669 --> 0:07:48.709
<v Speaker 2>they were bicker. Honestly films. She went on to do

0:07:48.789 --> 0:07:51.349
<v Speaker 2>other films like Lost in Translation. What are you doing?

0:07:51.829 --> 0:07:54.789
<v Speaker 4>My husband's a photographer, so he's here working. I wasn't

0:07:54.789 --> 0:07:56.189
<v Speaker 4>doing anything, so I came along.

0:07:56.709 --> 0:07:59.709
<v Speaker 2>What do you do? I'm not sure yet?

0:07:59.909 --> 0:08:01.389
<v Speaker 4>Actually did she do?

0:08:01.469 --> 0:08:09.029
<v Speaker 2>What about alligators? No? She did do. We bought a

0:08:09.109 --> 0:08:12.549
<v Speaker 2>zoo with Matt Day. That film Slaps I ordered early

0:08:12.829 --> 0:08:13.589
<v Speaker 2>for artist.

0:08:14.349 --> 0:08:16.109
<v Speaker 4>I got a big crush on you, and you just

0:08:16.149 --> 0:08:17.869
<v Speaker 4>can't get a.

0:08:17.229 --> 0:08:17.829
<v Speaker 3>Handle on it.

0:08:18.149 --> 0:08:21.429
<v Speaker 2>I haven't seen it. Oh, I cry, I laugh. It's

0:08:21.629 --> 0:08:24.389
<v Speaker 2>just a beautiful film. It's a great actress. Yeah, she

0:08:24.469 --> 0:08:28.109
<v Speaker 2>was in her match point Jojo Rabbit marriage story. Go

0:08:28.269 --> 0:08:31.069
<v Speaker 2>with Pearl marriage story is excellent, Adam drive up. There

0:08:31.109 --> 0:08:33.189
<v Speaker 2>are some great scenes in that. Sorry continue, and a

0:08:33.269 --> 0:08:36.629
<v Speaker 2>marvel thing about a black widow that's been going on

0:08:36.669 --> 0:08:39.669
<v Speaker 2>for maybe eight films. Ah, I understand. I was going

0:08:39.749 --> 0:08:42.989
<v Speaker 2>to say, not Madam Webb. Not Adam Webb.

0:08:43.029 --> 0:08:44.989
<v Speaker 4>He was in the Amazon with grand Mom when she

0:08:45.109 --> 0:08:47.349
<v Speaker 4>was researching Spider's right before she died.

0:08:48.189 --> 0:08:52.069
<v Speaker 2>That is a different film. She's also in plays on Broadway,

0:08:52.349 --> 0:08:54.469
<v Speaker 2>which always makes me feel like this person is a

0:08:54.509 --> 0:08:58.069
<v Speaker 2>real actdoor And when I interrogate that, it's because they

0:08:58.389 --> 0:09:00.589
<v Speaker 2>know their lines off by heart. Yeah, And I'm impressed

0:09:00.629 --> 0:09:03.309
<v Speaker 2>by that. Yeah. And they have to do the same

0:09:03.389 --> 0:09:06.429
<v Speaker 2>show many times in a week, which should be boring.

0:09:06.509 --> 0:09:09.149
<v Speaker 2>They have to perform live in front of an audio.

0:09:09.149 --> 0:09:11.029
<v Speaker 2>It's a different skill set. It's a different skill set.

0:09:11.029 --> 0:09:13.389
<v Speaker 2>And I'm impressed. I have a little relevance. Bit of

0:09:13.469 --> 0:09:16.309
<v Speaker 2>high interest to me personally. Are the people she's dated

0:09:16.709 --> 0:09:21.429
<v Speaker 2>Claire in high school? Oh, go on, she was married

0:09:22.229 --> 0:09:30.149
<v Speaker 2>to Ryan Reynolds, divorced, good one, good one. They did

0:09:30.149 --> 0:09:34.509
<v Speaker 2>get divorced in high school, stated Jack Antonoff. Yeah, as

0:09:34.549 --> 0:09:37.069
<v Speaker 2>a teenager Jack Antonoff, who then went on to date

0:09:37.189 --> 0:09:41.189
<v Speaker 2>Lena Dunham, and writes with Taylor Swift, and he's now

0:09:41.189 --> 0:09:47.629
<v Speaker 2>married to famous person's daughter. Yeah. Love that bit of trivia, then,

0:09:48.309 --> 0:09:52.789
<v Speaker 2>stated Josh Harnett, before marrying Ryan Reynolds. She has two

0:09:52.869 --> 0:09:55.509
<v Speaker 2>kids and is now married to a man named Colin.

0:09:55.869 --> 0:10:00.749
<v Speaker 2>Seems lovely. Oh nice, he's a comedian. Ah yeah. My

0:10:00.829 --> 0:10:05.749
<v Speaker 2>structure for today is as follows. Music career Okay, yeah,

0:10:05.869 --> 0:10:09.509
<v Speaker 2>Woody Allen. Casting controversies, including the time she went full

0:10:09.509 --> 0:10:14.829
<v Speaker 2>Emma Stone, the time she allegedly chose fizzy drink over charity.

0:10:15.269 --> 0:10:18.629
<v Speaker 2>I've written here in fairness, hard choice, the time her

0:10:18.709 --> 0:10:22.389
<v Speaker 2>mum disappeared in a viral video, and finally when she

0:10:22.429 --> 0:10:24.669
<v Speaker 2>made a dystopian sci fi movie and it came true

0:10:24.709 --> 0:10:29.309
<v Speaker 2>butlt worse mm. Firstly, music career. Just because she's one

0:10:29.349 --> 0:10:32.149
<v Speaker 2>of the world's highest paid female actors doesn't mean she

0:10:32.229 --> 0:10:36.989
<v Speaker 2>hasn't had a music career. This was her debut in

0:10:37.029 --> 0:10:38.829
<v Speaker 2>two thousand and eight, Claire, I'm Gonna play it to you.

0:10:39.589 --> 0:10:42.269
<v Speaker 2>Was she acting at that point? Yeah? Yeah, she was

0:10:42.469 --> 0:10:46.309
<v Speaker 2>like a really successful actress. And then she was like, actually,

0:10:46.349 --> 0:10:48.549
<v Speaker 2>I've always wanted to be a musician. I used to

0:10:48.549 --> 0:10:50.349
<v Speaker 2>do music halls and stuff, and then I was just

0:10:50.349 --> 0:10:53.429
<v Speaker 2>pushed into being a very famous actress. It's giving Russell Crowe,

0:10:53.589 --> 0:11:14.749
<v Speaker 2>it's giving Edward from Twilight. This was her first songs.

0:11:18.269 --> 0:11:20.749
<v Speaker 2>I think she's quite good. Do I find it interesting

0:11:20.789 --> 0:11:24.389
<v Speaker 2>that she can sing yes, wouldn't have thunk it, wouldn't

0:11:24.389 --> 0:11:27.709
<v Speaker 2>have thunk it. She's very influenced by Thomas Waits and

0:11:27.909 --> 0:11:32.669
<v Speaker 2>like sort of this indie folk soul thing. I suppose. Yeah,

0:11:32.669 --> 0:11:36.549
<v Speaker 2>I'd say it's not mainstream enough. That's a really good

0:11:36.549 --> 0:11:38.989
<v Speaker 2>point because I did go deep and I found her

0:11:39.029 --> 0:11:41.589
<v Speaker 2>SoundCloud and I found this song. It's not like released,

0:11:41.589 --> 0:11:43.229
<v Speaker 2>it's just like her singing a song that we know,

0:11:43.309 --> 0:11:45.509
<v Speaker 2>which I feel like helps in terms of our sense

0:11:45.549 --> 0:11:48.389
<v Speaker 2>of things. She needs Jack Antonov to write them songs

0:11:48.429 --> 0:11:49.749
<v Speaker 2>for it. Well, they've fallen out.

0:11:49.749 --> 0:11:55.349
<v Speaker 4>I would assumed I have clombed the highest mountains.

0:11:55.789 --> 0:11:57.829
<v Speaker 2>She's I have.

0:11:59.789 --> 0:12:03.909
<v Speaker 5>Through the fields.

0:12:02.389 --> 0:12:07.149
<v Speaker 2>On to be. I think she's not good, she's good?

0:12:07.949 --> 0:12:11.909
<v Speaker 2>Is she great? Oh? It's still good? No? No no

0:12:11.989 --> 0:12:15.189
<v Speaker 2>stop stop no no, we get it, scar Jo, Okay, okay.

0:12:15.429 --> 0:12:18.589
<v Speaker 2>Is she great? Is Ariana Grande great? Genuine question? I

0:12:18.589 --> 0:12:22.269
<v Speaker 2>don't know. Yes, Arianna Grande is great. I think she's fine,

0:12:22.349 --> 0:12:24.789
<v Speaker 2>and I think that's what gets a lot of people through.

0:12:25.349 --> 0:12:28.949
<v Speaker 2>I think she needs a role in musical I thought

0:12:28.949 --> 0:12:31.109
<v Speaker 2>the same, and I don't know why we haven't given her. Yeah,

0:12:31.189 --> 0:12:34.029
<v Speaker 2>Lame is for example, I think more of that. The album,

0:12:34.069 --> 0:12:35.869
<v Speaker 2>the first album that she did, had some big names

0:12:35.909 --> 0:12:39.029
<v Speaker 2>including David Bowie on it, but it got mixed reviews

0:12:39.109 --> 0:12:41.229
<v Speaker 2>and then it peaked at one hundred and twenty six

0:12:41.269 --> 0:12:44.509
<v Speaker 2>on the Billboard Charts. She made other albums, which again

0:12:44.549 --> 0:12:47.229
<v Speaker 2>critics didn't love, and then she formed a girl group

0:12:47.349 --> 0:12:50.309
<v Speaker 2>called Singles. Someone in the band is from Heim. Do

0:12:50.349 --> 0:12:53.149
<v Speaker 2>you know what is Heim? A person? Heim is a

0:12:53.189 --> 0:12:59.629
<v Speaker 2>band that are friends with Taylor Swift. Okay, well, someone

0:12:59.749 --> 0:13:03.549
<v Speaker 2>who sings in that was also in Scarlett Johnson's girl group.

0:13:03.789 --> 0:13:07.949
<v Speaker 2>But then another band called single Noes came forward with

0:13:07.989 --> 0:13:11.909
<v Speaker 2>a season desist and said we're called this stop and

0:13:11.949 --> 0:13:15.229
<v Speaker 2>she did stop. Couldn't she just change the name? You'd

0:13:15.229 --> 0:13:17.749
<v Speaker 2>think so, But I think it was like a lot

0:13:17.749 --> 0:13:21.349
<v Speaker 2>of things were telling out to stop. And I don't

0:13:21.349 --> 0:13:23.549
<v Speaker 2>think she's bad enough to have failed as much as

0:13:23.549 --> 0:13:26.989
<v Speaker 2>she has failed. So she's not as bad as Robert Pattinson. Well,

0:13:26.989 --> 0:13:28.989
<v Speaker 2>hold on, this is the thing about Russell Crow because

0:13:29.029 --> 0:13:33.509
<v Speaker 2>Russell Crowe is also fine. His music's fine, not.

0:13:33.749 --> 0:13:37.829
<v Speaker 3>One that the sheriff paid a bounty.

0:13:38.669 --> 0:13:39.669
<v Speaker 1>Some men like me.

0:13:40.389 --> 0:13:44.749
<v Speaker 2>Some thing's worse when you're fine. Yeah, yeah, because Russell

0:13:44.789 --> 0:13:46.829
<v Speaker 2>Crowe is giving it a real hot go. And this

0:13:46.869 --> 0:13:48.309
<v Speaker 2>is what we found is that a lot of actors

0:13:48.389 --> 0:13:50.669
<v Speaker 2>have reached top of the field, are going well. I

0:13:50.669 --> 0:13:53.669
<v Speaker 2>always wanted to be a musician and reach for the moon.

0:13:53.709 --> 0:13:56.069
<v Speaker 2>You might land among the stars, and they're reaching for

0:13:56.109 --> 0:13:58.069
<v Speaker 2>the moon and they're landing among one hundred and twenty

0:13:58.109 --> 0:14:02.069
<v Speaker 2>six on the Billboard. Sharp so true, Woody Allen Movies

0:14:02.989 --> 0:14:05.549
<v Speaker 2>Your Hands still very much stands by the eighty eight

0:14:05.589 --> 0:14:08.989
<v Speaker 2>year old filmmaker and actor Woody Allen. Can you remember

0:14:09.069 --> 0:14:11.709
<v Speaker 2>exactly what Alan is accused of? Because I went deep? Okay,

0:14:11.749 --> 0:14:12.069
<v Speaker 2>what is it?

0:14:12.149 --> 0:14:12.389
<v Speaker 5>Yes?

0:14:12.749 --> 0:14:16.189
<v Speaker 2>I know this by her? Okay. Firstly, who's he married to?

0:14:16.469 --> 0:14:20.469
<v Speaker 2>He's married to his well, who was once his adopted stepdaughter. Yeah,

0:14:20.589 --> 0:14:24.469
<v Speaker 2>don't marry family members, all right? Who was? I think

0:14:24.589 --> 0:14:27.749
<v Speaker 2>there's a bit of this really really confusing. But her

0:14:27.909 --> 0:14:31.829
<v Speaker 2>age is unclear because she was adopted without a birth certificate.

0:14:32.069 --> 0:14:35.429
<v Speaker 2>It's just strange to have had a relationship with somebody

0:14:35.429 --> 0:14:38.949
<v Speaker 2>as your daughter and then changed that relationship to your

0:14:38.989 --> 0:14:41.149
<v Speaker 2>wife and they're still married and they have two kids together.

0:14:41.389 --> 0:14:44.509
<v Speaker 2>And do you know about the other allegation, Yes, okay,

0:14:44.549 --> 0:14:47.789
<v Speaker 2>I've got the details here. So in August nineteen ninety two,

0:14:48.189 --> 0:14:51.149
<v Speaker 2>his adoptive daughter, Dylan Farrow, who was then aged seven,

0:14:51.469 --> 0:14:55.149
<v Speaker 2>alleged that he sexually molested her. He has denied the allegation.

0:14:55.469 --> 0:14:58.949
<v Speaker 2>Some of Dylan's siblings denied the allegation and say her mother,

0:14:59.229 --> 0:15:03.269
<v Speaker 2>Mia Farrow, brainwashed her, whereas Ron and Farrow stands by

0:15:03.269 --> 0:15:06.109
<v Speaker 2>his sister. The sexual abuse is alleged to have taken

0:15:06.109 --> 0:15:10.109
<v Speaker 2>place eight months after Meya Farrow, Allan's former partner and

0:15:10.149 --> 0:15:13.269
<v Speaker 2>Dylan Farrow's mother, learned that Alan was in a sexual

0:15:13.309 --> 0:15:18.389
<v Speaker 2>relationship with one of his other adoptive daughters, sun Ye Priven,

0:15:18.989 --> 0:15:22.429
<v Speaker 2>her age unclear. They think that it was something like

0:15:23.149 --> 0:15:26.269
<v Speaker 2>sun Ye was twenty one and Alan was fifty six,

0:15:26.749 --> 0:15:29.229
<v Speaker 2>and then they married in nineteen ninety seven. See the

0:15:29.309 --> 0:15:33.429
<v Speaker 2>interesting thing is people say, oh, well, maybe me or

0:15:33.509 --> 0:15:37.109
<v Speaker 2>Farrow was getting back at Woody Allen, that's the accusation,

0:15:37.309 --> 0:15:43.149
<v Speaker 2>or having a relationship with her daughter, and it's like yeah,

0:15:43.429 --> 0:15:47.829
<v Speaker 2>or maybe it's a pattern of behavior, Yes, yeah, maybe

0:15:47.909 --> 0:15:52.189
<v Speaker 2>that exactly. So there's a long list of actors who

0:15:52.189 --> 0:15:55.309
<v Speaker 2>will not work with Woody Allen. On that list Colin Firth,

0:15:55.669 --> 0:16:00.069
<v Speaker 2>Timothy Shallomey, Susan Sarandon, Greta Gerwick. And he doesn't actually

0:16:00.189 --> 0:16:02.389
<v Speaker 2>currently have a US distributor to his film, so if

0:16:02.389 --> 0:16:03.669
<v Speaker 2>he wanted to make a movie, no one in the

0:16:03.749 --> 0:16:06.069
<v Speaker 2>US will make movies with him. He's about as canceled

0:16:06.109 --> 0:16:09.069
<v Speaker 2>as you can get. But Scarlett Johansen, who's been in

0:16:09.109 --> 0:16:12.309
<v Speaker 2>three movies made by him, is like, I believe, I

0:16:12.309 --> 0:16:14.549
<v Speaker 2>believe what he says. A lot of people are very

0:16:14.549 --> 0:16:16.869
<v Speaker 2>mad about this because she is a vocal supporter of

0:16:16.909 --> 0:16:19.869
<v Speaker 2>Me Too times Up, all of those movements. But then

0:16:19.909 --> 0:16:21.829
<v Speaker 2>in twenty nineteen, she said in an interview with The

0:16:21.829 --> 0:16:25.269
<v Speaker 2>Hollywood Reporter, I love Woody, I believe him, and I

0:16:25.309 --> 0:16:28.629
<v Speaker 2>would work with him anytime I see Woody whenever I can,

0:16:28.909 --> 0:16:31.469
<v Speaker 2>and I've had a lot of conversations with him about it.

0:16:31.829 --> 0:16:34.429
<v Speaker 2>I've been very direct with him, and he's very direct

0:16:34.429 --> 0:16:37.629
<v Speaker 2>with me. He maintains his innocence and I believe him.

0:16:38.229 --> 0:16:41.309
<v Speaker 2>So all I'll say is, you're gonna really want to

0:16:41.309 --> 0:16:45.229
<v Speaker 2>believe him. Yeah, you wouldn't want to be wrong. No,

0:16:45.909 --> 0:16:48.469
<v Speaker 2>because Dylan has come out in a tweet and just

0:16:48.509 --> 0:16:55.469
<v Speaker 2>basically said, you are undermining the testimonies of people. I say, yeah,

0:16:56.029 --> 0:16:58.549
<v Speaker 2>of survivor stories, and you're gonna want to be sure,

0:16:58.829 --> 0:17:01.229
<v Speaker 2>Yeah I haven't. There quite a few actors that stand

0:17:01.269 --> 0:17:04.389
<v Speaker 2>by We are very few now, very very few. There

0:17:04.389 --> 0:17:06.669
<v Speaker 2>are some in the Stone did a movie with him

0:17:06.709 --> 0:17:08.989
<v Speaker 2>not that many years ago. Yeah, so she has. I

0:17:08.989 --> 0:17:10.869
<v Speaker 2>think Blake Lively might have on a movie with him.

0:17:10.909 --> 0:17:15.029
<v Speaker 2>But really since about twenty eighteen, people have stepped back

0:17:15.109 --> 0:17:17.709
<v Speaker 2>for her to say. In twenty nineteen, I believe him

0:17:18.389 --> 0:17:29.749
<v Speaker 2>was a big deal. Casting controversies. Your Hanson has gone

0:17:29.789 --> 0:17:32.469
<v Speaker 2>pretty hard on the I should be able to play anyone,

0:17:32.669 --> 0:17:36.229
<v Speaker 2>flash anything, and the internet has handled that really well.

0:17:36.909 --> 0:17:39.469
<v Speaker 2>In twenty seventeen, Your Hanson went a little bit Emma

0:17:39.509 --> 0:17:42.069
<v Speaker 2>Stone on Aloha. We have talked about that, Claire, would

0:17:42.109 --> 0:17:45.709
<v Speaker 2>you like to refresh our listeners? In the film Aloha,

0:17:46.189 --> 0:17:50.629
<v Speaker 2>it is a terrible film. Emma Stone played somebody who

0:17:50.749 --> 0:17:54.589
<v Speaker 2>was of Asian descent. Yes, Emma Stone is not of

0:17:54.629 --> 0:17:57.789
<v Speaker 2>Asian descent. Interesting and it was weird, but they kind

0:17:57.829 --> 0:18:00.189
<v Speaker 2>of tried to make her a little bit Asian, which

0:18:00.269 --> 0:18:03.149
<v Speaker 2>somehow makes it worse. We'll get to that. Your Hanson

0:18:03.269 --> 0:18:06.629
<v Speaker 2>was cast the lead in a film called Ghost in

0:18:06.669 --> 0:18:10.069
<v Speaker 2>the Shell, which is based on a Japanese manga series.

0:18:10.109 --> 0:18:11.629
<v Speaker 4>I saw someone down there.

0:18:13.989 --> 0:18:17.149
<v Speaker 3>He wasn't human.

0:18:17.349 --> 0:18:20.149
<v Speaker 2>He's a non terrorist and he's killed again.

0:18:22.829 --> 0:18:25.909
<v Speaker 4>They didn't just kill them, they hacked into their reins.

0:18:27.189 --> 0:18:31.549
<v Speaker 2>In the original series, there's a character named Motoko kasanag

0:18:31.949 --> 0:18:35.029
<v Speaker 2>but in the film adaptation, this character just becomes Major,

0:18:35.429 --> 0:18:38.949
<v Speaker 2>and he's played by your Hands Your handsOn. Major is

0:18:38.949 --> 0:18:41.229
<v Speaker 2>a cyborg who was meant to hold the memories of

0:18:41.269 --> 0:18:44.669
<v Speaker 2>a Japanese woman, which made many think maybe the actress

0:18:44.669 --> 0:18:47.309
<v Speaker 2>should be Japanese. But your Handson's like she's a cyborg,

0:18:47.349 --> 0:18:50.269
<v Speaker 2>and it's like she's a Japanese cyborg. It's confusing because

0:18:50.269 --> 0:18:52.509
<v Speaker 2>it's also set in Japan in a fictional place, but

0:18:52.549 --> 0:18:54.749
<v Speaker 2>it's in Japan and everyone else is Japanese and it

0:18:54.789 --> 0:18:57.749
<v Speaker 2>was written by Japanese. But wait, wait, so Scarlet Johansen

0:18:57.829 --> 0:19:00.589
<v Speaker 2>is just the only non Japanese person and also happens

0:19:00.589 --> 0:19:03.989
<v Speaker 2>to be the lead. Yes, okay, I feel like they

0:19:04.029 --> 0:19:06.309
<v Speaker 2>needed a big name to get it across the line.

0:19:06.389 --> 0:19:09.189
<v Speaker 2>That is what your Hands and others also said. Okay.

0:19:09.509 --> 0:19:11.949
<v Speaker 2>There were lots of reports at the time that the

0:19:12.029 --> 0:19:17.189
<v Speaker 2>producers tested visual effects to make your Handsome appear more Asian,

0:19:17.229 --> 0:19:19.069
<v Speaker 2>but in the end they didn't use them. Oh good,

0:19:19.669 --> 0:19:23.389
<v Speaker 2>I think that's good. Constance Wu called your Hanson's casting

0:19:23.589 --> 0:19:28.029
<v Speaker 2>the practice of blackface employed on Asians. Responding to the backlash,

0:19:28.069 --> 0:19:29.269
<v Speaker 2>your Hanson said, she's.

0:19:29.149 --> 0:19:32.429
<v Speaker 4>Essentially identity less. I would never attempt to play a

0:19:32.629 --> 0:19:36.429
<v Speaker 4>person of a different rease, obviously hopefully of any question

0:19:36.509 --> 0:19:38.829
<v Speaker 4>that comes up of my casting and will hopefully be

0:19:38.869 --> 0:19:41.989
<v Speaker 4>answered by audiences when they see the film.

0:19:42.229 --> 0:19:44.109
<v Speaker 2>And the idea was that she was a big name

0:19:44.509 --> 0:19:46.189
<v Speaker 2>and that she would get a lot of people. It

0:19:46.229 --> 0:19:49.389
<v Speaker 2>was a bit of a box office flop. The controversy

0:19:49.789 --> 0:19:52.869
<v Speaker 2>didn't help m I remember seeing that and just thinking,

0:19:53.189 --> 0:19:57.989
<v Speaker 2>you know what, too many steps for me, too many steps. Yeah, yeah,

0:19:58.029 --> 0:20:00.829
<v Speaker 2>because I'm not going to see that film. Yeah, I'm

0:20:00.869 --> 0:20:05.829
<v Speaker 2>already confused, and I haven't started watching it. Yeah, I agree.

0:20:06.069 --> 0:20:09.669
<v Speaker 2>In twenty nineteen, she said, you know, as an actor,

0:20:10.149 --> 0:20:12.429
<v Speaker 2>I should be allowed to play any person, or any

0:20:12.509 --> 0:20:15.069
<v Speaker 2>tree or any animal, because that is my job and

0:20:15.109 --> 0:20:17.509
<v Speaker 2>the requirements of my job. There are a lot of

0:20:17.509 --> 0:20:19.789
<v Speaker 2>social lines being drawn now and a lot of political

0:20:19.869 --> 0:20:24.309
<v Speaker 2>correctness is being reflected in art. Claire, should your handsend

0:20:24.509 --> 0:20:30.589
<v Speaker 2>be able to play any tree? Yes, genuinely, a Christmas,

0:20:30.629 --> 0:20:34.309
<v Speaker 2>genuinely trees. Go for your life, Claire, I honestly don't

0:20:34.309 --> 0:20:36.429
<v Speaker 2>know any other trees other than Pam and Christmas. Think

0:20:36.469 --> 0:20:40.869
<v Speaker 2>of another one, think of it. Morton Bay fig. No,

0:20:41.029 --> 0:20:45.069
<v Speaker 2>that's an Australian tree. Fuck off that food, don't that's

0:20:45.149 --> 0:20:50.469
<v Speaker 2>Morton Bay bug. She should play a Morton Bay bug too.

0:20:51.789 --> 0:20:55.149
<v Speaker 2>She should be allowed. She could honestly be a great bug,

0:20:55.469 --> 0:21:00.349
<v Speaker 2>although that would be taking opportunities from away from Morton Bay.

0:21:00.389 --> 0:21:02.709
<v Speaker 2>But I don't think Morton Bay bug is a thing. No,

0:21:02.829 --> 0:21:08.069
<v Speaker 2>it is, okay, definitely for eating. But yes, play any tree, honestly.

0:21:08.749 --> 0:21:13.349
<v Speaker 2>But I just think drawing a comparison between a tree

0:21:13.909 --> 0:21:18.509
<v Speaker 2>and a type of human not a good comparison. Not

0:21:18.589 --> 0:21:21.589
<v Speaker 2>a good comparison. And I guess it's a bit like Scarlet.

0:21:22.269 --> 0:21:29.029
<v Speaker 2>You have lots of roles, Yeah, you've got a pretty faith,

0:21:29.429 --> 0:21:34.629
<v Speaker 2>got beautiful body. Lots of roles for Scarlet. Yeah, yes,

0:21:34.789 --> 0:21:37.109
<v Speaker 2>some people don't have a lot of roles, and you

0:21:37.189 --> 0:21:39.469
<v Speaker 2>appear to be taking the role. I want that woman,

0:21:40.549 --> 0:21:42.429
<v Speaker 2>I want that I want to be the cyble. I

0:21:42.469 --> 0:21:44.469
<v Speaker 2>want that woman, and maybe that role can go to

0:21:44.509 --> 0:21:46.509
<v Speaker 2>somebody who maybe has just a little bit more of

0:21:46.549 --> 0:21:51.109
<v Speaker 2>an authentic connection in that they belong to the culture.

0:21:51.349 --> 0:21:53.309
<v Speaker 2>But she says she's an actor, so she can play.

0:21:53.309 --> 0:21:56.069
<v Speaker 2>That's the point of acting, which actually gets me to

0:21:56.189 --> 0:21:58.629
<v Speaker 2>a point in twenty eighteen where she accepted a role

0:21:58.669 --> 0:22:00.829
<v Speaker 2>as a transgender man in a film called Rabin Ducks.

0:22:00.869 --> 0:22:02.709
<v Speaker 2>Oh my god, I didn't know about that. Yeah, some

0:22:02.789 --> 0:22:06.189
<v Speaker 2>members of the LGBT community and allies weren't happy about it,

0:22:06.589 --> 0:22:09.029
<v Speaker 2>but she stood her ground, and she listed a bunch

0:22:09.109 --> 0:22:11.509
<v Speaker 2>of sciss gender actors who had played trans people and

0:22:11.549 --> 0:22:13.269
<v Speaker 2>she's like, you're allowed to do it. Look at Felicity

0:22:13.309 --> 0:22:16.949
<v Speaker 2>Hoffman and Jared Leto in Dallas Buyers Club played a

0:22:16.989 --> 0:22:20.549
<v Speaker 2>transmit and then the different different time, and then the

0:22:20.589 --> 0:22:23.549
<v Speaker 2>community were like, oh, we hate them too. Yeah, and

0:22:23.589 --> 0:22:26.629
<v Speaker 2>she was like, okay, of misunderstood. I stand back, And

0:22:26.669 --> 0:22:29.989
<v Speaker 2>she actually dropped the project because she felt like she

0:22:30.189 --> 0:22:33.189
<v Speaker 2>was wrong, and she apologized and she said, I misunderstood.

0:22:33.429 --> 0:22:35.869
<v Speaker 2>I thought it was allowed. Is that what she said?

0:22:36.069 --> 0:22:40.189
<v Speaker 2>Along those lads, Okay, okay, has that film being made? Okay,

0:22:40.189 --> 0:22:42.389
<v Speaker 2>this is the interesting thing. Right. So she stepped back

0:22:42.549 --> 0:22:44.829
<v Speaker 2>and said, yep, I think a trans person should play this.

0:22:45.229 --> 0:22:47.589
<v Speaker 2>I don't think it has I think it's still in

0:22:47.629 --> 0:22:48.989
<v Speaker 2>the works. I mean it was twenty eighteen, and we

0:22:49.029 --> 0:22:51.149
<v Speaker 2>know that films take a really long time. But this

0:22:51.229 --> 0:22:53.869
<v Speaker 2>is the argument that actors like Scarlet Your Hands and make,

0:22:54.269 --> 0:22:56.229
<v Speaker 2>which is that if she's a big name and she's

0:22:56.229 --> 0:22:59.269
<v Speaker 2>a big pool, can we tell different stories? But I

0:22:59.269 --> 0:23:02.749
<v Speaker 2>think it's on Hollywood. It's on producers, it's on directors

0:23:03.269 --> 0:23:06.069
<v Speaker 2>to make these projects take risks instead of just having

0:23:06.749 --> 0:23:11.909
<v Speaker 2>the same formula with the same names. Will we see

0:23:12.189 --> 0:23:15.869
<v Speaker 2>those movies? Yes? Will we see a Black Widow nine? Absolutely?

0:23:16.869 --> 0:23:22.229
<v Speaker 2>Where probably the problem choosing fizzy drink over charity a

0:23:22.349 --> 0:23:24.789
<v Speaker 2>tale as a lot of time. Coke zero, No, it

0:23:24.789 --> 0:23:27.309
<v Speaker 2>wasn't coke zero, and it wasn't. No, it wasn't. So

0:23:27.389 --> 0:23:30.189
<v Speaker 2>therefore that is about exactly, it's a bad decision. For

0:23:30.229 --> 0:23:33.469
<v Speaker 2>eight years, your hansom was a global ambassador for Oxfam,

0:23:33.949 --> 0:23:36.949
<v Speaker 2>which is all about alleviating poverty. Go your handsom go

0:23:37.029 --> 0:23:40.309
<v Speaker 2>ox Fam. No crimes there, and then she got a

0:23:40.309 --> 0:23:44.709
<v Speaker 2>call from her friends at Soda Stream. What do you

0:23:44.829 --> 0:23:48.909
<v Speaker 2>think of so? I mean, as a beverage okay, never

0:23:49.069 --> 0:23:53.869
<v Speaker 2>enough flavor interesting soda Stream. I wouldn't my fizzy drink

0:23:53.909 --> 0:23:57.309
<v Speaker 2>with sugar. Sorry, sorry, not being clean. It's like, why

0:23:57.349 --> 0:24:00.069
<v Speaker 2>do I have to make my own fizzy drink? Yes,

0:24:00.469 --> 0:24:03.989
<v Speaker 2>soda streams had a moment where it was very I

0:24:04.029 --> 0:24:05.949
<v Speaker 2>have a soda stream, want to come play with it?

0:24:05.989 --> 0:24:08.829
<v Speaker 2>And I'm like obviously, And then I would make something

0:24:08.869 --> 0:24:11.989
<v Speaker 2>and think, hmmm, why have this when I could just

0:24:12.029 --> 0:24:15.509
<v Speaker 2>go buy a fan hut fronta Welcome to the World. Yeah,

0:24:15.629 --> 0:24:19.069
<v Speaker 2>I feel similar. I think it's the forty five teaspoons

0:24:19.069 --> 0:24:22.109
<v Speaker 2>of sugar that make it worth it for me. I

0:24:22.109 --> 0:24:24.709
<v Speaker 2>think all it does is turn water into carbonate. Is

0:24:24.789 --> 0:24:28.629
<v Speaker 2>something about carbonated something something, and it's all fizzy and

0:24:28.669 --> 0:24:31.629
<v Speaker 2>bubbly and I hate bubbly water. Hate it. Yeah, taste

0:24:31.749 --> 0:24:34.989
<v Speaker 2>like a tummy ache. Let's get a bubble in your stomach.

0:24:35.509 --> 0:24:37.709
<v Speaker 2>I'm not a big fan. I need flavor with my bubbles.

0:24:37.749 --> 0:24:40.989
<v Speaker 2>But Scarlet clearly liked bit of soda stream and it

0:24:41.029 --> 0:24:43.629
<v Speaker 2>was very exciting. In twenty fourteen, look at this technology,

0:24:43.829 --> 0:24:46.669
<v Speaker 2>look at it go. She was the face of a

0:24:46.709 --> 0:24:49.509
<v Speaker 2>Super Bowl commercial promoting soda Stream. What's the big deal?

0:24:49.669 --> 0:24:51.429
<v Speaker 2>What does soda stream have to do with human rights,

0:24:51.429 --> 0:24:56.789
<v Speaker 2>clod you want to take a guess. I know what

0:24:56.989 --> 0:24:59.149
<v Speaker 2>is hard. It is hard to guess.

0:24:59.309 --> 0:24:59.469
<v Speaker 1>Well.

0:24:59.909 --> 0:25:04.229
<v Speaker 2>Soda Stream is an Israel based manufacturing company and at

0:25:04.229 --> 0:25:07.469
<v Speaker 2>the time, its main factory was in an Israeli settlement

0:25:07.509 --> 0:25:10.469
<v Speaker 2>in the West Bank, which Oxfam was very much against.

0:25:10.469 --> 0:25:16.029
<v Speaker 2>They saw Hanson's endorsement of Soda Stream contradicted their principles,

0:25:16.029 --> 0:25:19.189
<v Speaker 2>and in a statement they said, ox Fan believes that

0:25:19.269 --> 0:25:22.869
<v Speaker 2>businesses such as Soda Stream that operate in settlements further

0:25:22.949 --> 0:25:26.189
<v Speaker 2>the ongoing poverty and denial of rights of the Palestinian communities.

0:25:26.389 --> 0:25:30.749
<v Speaker 2>We work to support your Hansen wasn't like, oh I

0:25:30.749 --> 0:25:34.029
<v Speaker 2>didn't know, because I've thought maybe she's just genuinely Yeah,

0:25:34.269 --> 0:25:38.349
<v Speaker 2>she she saw Soda Stream as quite want a dizzy drink,

0:25:38.429 --> 0:25:40.669
<v Speaker 2>just as yeah, she just wanted a fizzy drink. And

0:25:40.709 --> 0:25:43.589
<v Speaker 2>then you that you go, that really changes. Yeah, yeah,

0:25:43.589 --> 0:25:45.869
<v Speaker 2>I might ensure where all the factories were. No, no, she said,

0:25:45.989 --> 0:25:48.149
<v Speaker 2>I was aware of that particular factory before I signed.

0:25:48.349 --> 0:25:50.389
<v Speaker 2>And it still doesn't seem like a problem, at least

0:25:50.429 --> 0:25:52.429
<v Speaker 2>not until someone comes up with a solution to the

0:25:52.429 --> 0:25:55.829
<v Speaker 2>closing of that factory and leaving all those people destitute.

0:25:56.429 --> 0:26:00.269
<v Speaker 2>So her position was, it's giving jobs, it's paying Palestinians

0:26:00.269 --> 0:26:02.269
<v Speaker 2>more than they're being paid in other places. And then

0:26:02.309 --> 0:26:04.509
<v Speaker 2>she said OXFAM is taking a political position on this,

0:26:04.549 --> 0:26:07.069
<v Speaker 2>blah blah blah. Anyway, it couldn't be resolved, so she

0:26:07.149 --> 0:26:09.709
<v Speaker 2>made the soda Stream commercial. So she chose so to

0:26:09.749 --> 0:26:13.069
<v Speaker 2>stream OXFD and then Oxfam was like, we've accepted her

0:26:13.189 --> 0:26:16.509
<v Speaker 2>resignation from OXFAM due to not saying eye to eye

0:26:16.549 --> 0:26:20.029
<v Speaker 2>on this issue. Okay, Yeah, if you're weighing up those decisions,

0:26:20.589 --> 0:26:23.709
<v Speaker 2>you'd hope you'd err on the side of ox Man. Yeah,

0:26:24.309 --> 0:26:29.389
<v Speaker 2>maybe she'd already made that, especially asfore mentioned. So does

0:26:29.429 --> 0:26:34.429
<v Speaker 2>do it make worth? It? Stream sucks and it was

0:26:34.429 --> 0:26:37.029
<v Speaker 2>a moment in time. I don't think any lazy girls

0:26:37.029 --> 0:26:39.469
<v Speaker 2>like soda Stream because it is a step, but I

0:26:39.469 --> 0:26:41.829
<v Speaker 2>think it's something that people might buy a lazy girl,

0:26:41.869 --> 0:26:44.789
<v Speaker 2>similar to what's the thing that got really big? It's

0:26:44.869 --> 0:26:47.309
<v Speaker 2>like an oven, but it's like a doesn't use oil

0:26:47.989 --> 0:26:51.109
<v Speaker 2>an air fryer. It's still good to do something. Yeah,

0:26:51.629 --> 0:26:53.949
<v Speaker 2>you're still don't pretend it's magic. You're still are I've

0:26:53.949 --> 0:26:55.509
<v Speaker 2>gotta put a thing in a thing and get it out.

0:26:56.549 --> 0:27:00.069
<v Speaker 2>So an appliance is a fun thing for a lazy girl,

0:27:00.269 --> 0:27:03.549
<v Speaker 2>if you know, I like fizzy drinks. Lifetime supply of

0:27:03.589 --> 0:27:11.549
<v Speaker 2>fizzy drinks. Bite me a s lab. The time her

0:27:11.549 --> 0:27:15.629
<v Speaker 2>mother disappeared. Oh no, Claire, please watch this viral video

0:27:15.709 --> 0:27:17.269
<v Speaker 2>of your hands and on a red carpet. Have you

0:27:17.309 --> 0:27:20.549
<v Speaker 2>seen this? No? Okay? Very famous And what was the

0:27:20.589 --> 0:27:21.989
<v Speaker 2>highlight of the evening for you tonight?

0:27:22.789 --> 0:27:26.309
<v Speaker 4>Philip Sema Hoffman winning for Best Actor for a Drama.

0:27:28.109 --> 0:27:33.989
<v Speaker 2>Oh my god, that is my mom. Wait what that's

0:27:34.029 --> 0:27:37.429
<v Speaker 2>my mom? Wait, let's watch it again. That's your Remember

0:27:37.509 --> 0:27:40.669
<v Speaker 2>what that woman with the dark hair is my mother, Claire?

0:27:40.869 --> 0:27:44.869
<v Speaker 2>Where did her mom go? That video is the single

0:27:44.909 --> 0:27:47.709
<v Speaker 2>most bizarre thing I've ever seen. That woman disappears into

0:27:47.829 --> 0:27:51.029
<v Speaker 2>thin air, Okay, on a red carpet. On a red carpet.

0:27:51.069 --> 0:27:55.149
<v Speaker 2>I think she's absorbed into scarlet or absorbed into one

0:27:55.189 --> 0:27:57.549
<v Speaker 2>of people walking past. It's magic or there's like a

0:27:57.589 --> 0:28:01.709
<v Speaker 2>secret trapdoor at the media wall and she disappears into it,

0:28:01.829 --> 0:28:04.429
<v Speaker 2>or what she's done, which I can imagine doing. You're

0:28:04.469 --> 0:28:07.149
<v Speaker 2>walking and then you go, don't want to be here anymore,

0:28:07.229 --> 0:28:11.669
<v Speaker 2>so you crouch down, crouched roll and you know, long

0:28:11.749 --> 0:28:13.589
<v Speaker 2>grow on cam so It's one of those glitch in

0:28:13.629 --> 0:28:15.949
<v Speaker 2>the matrix things where there's a lot of comments, a

0:28:15.989 --> 0:28:18.829
<v Speaker 2>lot of theories. The two bigger series are number one

0:28:19.029 --> 0:28:24.789
<v Speaker 2>magic and number two supernatural. I would say optical illusion.

0:28:25.389 --> 0:28:27.069
<v Speaker 2>I would say that because I looked it up on

0:28:27.269 --> 0:28:30.269
<v Speaker 2>Snopes and what is Snopes say? Snopes managed to find

0:28:30.269 --> 0:28:33.029
<v Speaker 2>a video from a different angle, and what happened, I know,

0:28:33.269 --> 0:28:36.709
<v Speaker 2>is so boring. It's like, well, it's supernatural magic. I

0:28:36.709 --> 0:28:38.469
<v Speaker 2>don't know why I have to ruin everyone's fun. Just

0:28:38.469 --> 0:28:40.309
<v Speaker 2>for those who don't know, Snopes is like a fact

0:28:40.389 --> 0:28:42.509
<v Speaker 2>checker site, and so if you're ever looking at a

0:28:42.509 --> 0:28:44.429
<v Speaker 2>story and you're like, wait, but is that actually true?

0:28:44.509 --> 0:28:46.509
<v Speaker 2>You can google it on Snopes. But I thought that

0:28:46.549 --> 0:28:47.949
<v Speaker 2>I was going to look up Snopes and it was

0:28:47.949 --> 0:28:51.309
<v Speaker 2>just going to have in capital letters magic, gosh, a

0:28:51.349 --> 0:28:54.189
<v Speaker 2>bit of fun. Sometimes Snopes through them for fun. But anyway,

0:28:54.549 --> 0:28:57.109
<v Speaker 2>it is it fun Ruiner. That should be their little

0:28:57.189 --> 0:29:00.909
<v Speaker 2>tag line. Well fun Ruiner found another angle and it

0:29:00.949 --> 0:29:02.389
<v Speaker 2>turns out that she was walking and she just kind

0:29:02.429 --> 0:29:04.829
<v Speaker 2>of stopped behind scarlet and the perfect like it's like

0:29:04.869 --> 0:29:07.309
<v Speaker 2>an optical illusion. She's stopped and you can't really see her.

0:29:07.869 --> 0:29:10.109
<v Speaker 2>But I did look up, scarlet your hands as mum,

0:29:10.269 --> 0:29:14.309
<v Speaker 2>and she's very much around. She was found after I guess,

0:29:14.669 --> 0:29:18.469
<v Speaker 2>disappearing for thirty minutes into thin air. She's seventy three

0:29:18.469 --> 0:29:21.149
<v Speaker 2>and she lives in New York. So she's fine. She's fine,

0:29:21.309 --> 0:29:23.469
<v Speaker 2>she's fine. She's not still on that red carpet. Good

0:29:24.469 --> 0:29:27.869
<v Speaker 2>lazy girls, listen up, because we have good news. Lazy

0:29:27.869 --> 0:29:31.869
<v Speaker 2>Girl giveaways are back, and we have a very exciting

0:29:32.029 --> 0:29:35.989
<v Speaker 2>prize or plural prizes to start with. This month, we

0:29:36.029 --> 0:29:39.269
<v Speaker 2>are giving away twelve two hundred and fifty dollars Best

0:29:39.269 --> 0:29:41.949
<v Speaker 2>and Less vouchers. Claire, Why do lazy girls love Best

0:29:41.949 --> 0:29:45.269
<v Speaker 2>and Less? Because you can do everything in the one place.

0:29:45.389 --> 0:29:49.229
<v Speaker 2>I love Best and Less. The fact that you can

0:29:49.269 --> 0:29:53.749
<v Speaker 2>get something best and Less is grateful. Is like baby clothes, Yeah,

0:29:53.869 --> 0:29:58.389
<v Speaker 2>little doggy clothes, little says, it actually does have dog clothes.

0:29:58.389 --> 0:30:01.269
<v Speaker 2>That's a really good point. But it also has clothes

0:30:01.309 --> 0:30:05.429
<v Speaker 2>for you. Yes, let me guess you're cold, it's in winter. Well,

0:30:05.469 --> 0:30:07.629
<v Speaker 2>why not get a jumper from Best and Less? Actually,

0:30:07.789 --> 0:30:11.189
<v Speaker 2>why not get very warm pajamas? One of the great joys.

0:30:11.269 --> 0:30:13.269
<v Speaker 2>You want a whole water bottle, you can get that too.

0:30:13.509 --> 0:30:15.149
<v Speaker 2>You want a snack, as you're going to the cow

0:30:15.789 --> 0:30:18.589
<v Speaker 2>can get that Best and Less has you. As always,

0:30:19.229 --> 0:30:21.349
<v Speaker 2>entering is easy. All you have to do is subscribe

0:30:21.389 --> 0:30:23.389
<v Speaker 2>to MoMA Maya and you'll be in the running for

0:30:23.509 --> 0:30:27.069
<v Speaker 2>this giveaway and all future Lazy Girl giveaways. The link

0:30:27.109 --> 0:30:29.749
<v Speaker 2>to subscribe is in the show. Note. If you're already

0:30:29.789 --> 0:30:34.029
<v Speaker 2>a subscriber, the work's done, Sit back, relax, will tell

0:30:34.149 --> 0:30:36.029
<v Speaker 2>you if you've won. You don't have to do anything. Oh,

0:30:36.029 --> 0:30:37.389
<v Speaker 2>you don't have to check anything. Oh it's not like

0:30:37.429 --> 0:30:39.629
<v Speaker 2>the lot of imagine that checking your numbers. That was

0:30:39.629 --> 0:30:43.309
<v Speaker 2>always really stressful. Yeah, I'm gonna have lost it ticket.

0:30:43.389 --> 0:30:46.549
<v Speaker 2>I've never bought a lotto ticket because the admin of

0:30:46.669 --> 0:30:49.149
<v Speaker 2>me having to check. I'm like, will you call me

0:30:49.709 --> 0:30:51.709
<v Speaker 2>check my number? Will you call me? Or do I

0:30:51.709 --> 0:30:55.069
<v Speaker 2>call you to check if I've won? We have good news,

0:30:55.229 --> 0:30:57.829
<v Speaker 2>we have your details. Will reach out. Hey, you've won

0:30:57.869 --> 0:30:59.789
<v Speaker 2>two hundred and fifty dollars the Best and Less And

0:30:59.829 --> 0:31:02.429
<v Speaker 2>you say, wow, I didn't even enter. Well, you're a subscriber,

0:31:02.669 --> 0:31:05.869
<v Speaker 2>so so you did t's and c Supply we haven't

0:31:05.909 --> 0:31:19.069
<v Speaker 2>read them. Someone else has, say seem fine, Claire. When

0:31:19.109 --> 0:31:22.189
<v Speaker 2>Scarlett Johnsen made a dystopian sci fi movie and it

0:31:22.229 --> 0:31:27.749
<v Speaker 2>came true but worse. How good was the movie? Her? Yeah?

0:31:27.789 --> 0:31:29.549
<v Speaker 2>It was one of my favorite movies ever. It's got

0:31:29.909 --> 0:31:33.189
<v Speaker 2>Waki Whakin, who I can never pronounce his name.

0:31:33.189 --> 0:31:33.309
<v Speaker 1>Oh.

0:31:33.389 --> 0:31:36.189
<v Speaker 2>How interesting because it also has Rooney Mara. I think

0:31:36.429 --> 0:31:39.909
<v Speaker 2>and is he married to her? Sounds right? Sounds right?

0:31:40.029 --> 0:31:43.709
<v Speaker 2>I think he's married to Rooney. You really liked that movie?

0:31:43.749 --> 0:31:46.309
<v Speaker 2>I thought it was good, but I didn't love it

0:31:46.349 --> 0:31:49.869
<v Speaker 2>as much as you are married. We did our snakes factchecker. Okay, well.

0:31:49.989 --> 0:31:51.869
<v Speaker 2>It was released in twenty thirteen, and it was all

0:31:51.909 --> 0:31:53.669
<v Speaker 2>about a man who falls in love with an AI

0:31:53.829 --> 0:31:59.789
<v Speaker 2>voice system. Hello, I'm here, Hi, Hi, I'm Samantha.

0:32:01.509 --> 0:32:04.829
<v Speaker 4>Good morning, Theodore morning. You have a meeting in five minutes.

0:32:05.069 --> 0:32:06.829
<v Speaker 3>You want to try getting out of bed?

0:32:07.309 --> 0:32:07.509
<v Speaker 1>Too?

0:32:07.669 --> 0:32:08.029
<v Speaker 2>Funny?

0:32:08.309 --> 0:32:13.269
<v Speaker 4>Okay, good, I'm funny. I wanna learn everything about everything.

0:32:13.069 --> 0:32:16.589
<v Speaker 2>But loveful you look for world. It was so far

0:32:17.309 --> 0:32:20.509
<v Speaker 2>before it's time because the voice assistant grew with data,

0:32:20.749 --> 0:32:22.589
<v Speaker 2>so it became more of what he wanted As a

0:32:22.629 --> 0:32:26.029
<v Speaker 2>film went on. That voice was, of course Scarlet or Hanson.

0:32:26.109 --> 0:32:27.669
<v Speaker 2>Did you know that the film was actually made with

0:32:27.709 --> 0:32:29.589
<v Speaker 2>someone else's voice and at the last minute they subbed

0:32:29.589 --> 0:32:32.309
<v Speaker 2>her out. That was a good idea. It was. I

0:32:32.309 --> 0:32:36.069
<v Speaker 2>think Scarlet's voice made it. Yeah, me too, sucks. I

0:32:36.189 --> 0:32:38.589
<v Speaker 2>was a little bit. As you're watching the movie, you're like, yeah,

0:32:38.589 --> 0:32:40.069
<v Speaker 2>I think I would fall in love with Scarlet your

0:32:40.069 --> 0:32:43.429
<v Speaker 2>Hanson's voice as well. There's something just beautiful about it.

0:32:43.749 --> 0:32:46.469
<v Speaker 2>Do you think I have a sexy voice?

0:32:46.949 --> 0:32:47.109
<v Speaker 1>No?

0:32:48.109 --> 0:32:50.909
<v Speaker 2>I think if you were the voice in someone's life,

0:32:51.549 --> 0:32:54.269
<v Speaker 2>like if you were a Lexa say, people would stop

0:32:54.349 --> 0:33:00.149
<v Speaker 2>using the product. Okay, why there's just nothing beautiful about

0:33:00.189 --> 0:33:04.549
<v Speaker 2>your voice? No offense? Yeah, I don't know. I was

0:33:04.589 --> 0:33:07.789
<v Speaker 2>thinking that it's a bit. It's not sexy. It's not sexy.

0:33:07.829 --> 0:33:10.029
<v Speaker 2>It's not you know what doesn't have it? Don't rasping?

0:33:10.549 --> 0:33:12.949
<v Speaker 2>Do I have to have some raspiness? You know how

0:33:12.949 --> 0:33:15.509
<v Speaker 2>they'd like to do that thing? And she's like, how

0:33:15.589 --> 0:33:18.629
<v Speaker 2>is your day? Whack in? Yeah? And your voice is

0:33:18.829 --> 0:33:25.989
<v Speaker 2>very comforting? No or kind or warm? Yeah, it's quite grating. Yeah,

0:33:26.149 --> 0:33:28.629
<v Speaker 2>ask me a question as though I am in the movie.

0:33:28.669 --> 0:33:32.829
<v Speaker 2>Her name is Samantha. Hi, Samantha, how is your morning? Hi?

0:33:32.989 --> 0:33:34.949
<v Speaker 2>Whack in my morning?

0:33:35.589 --> 0:33:35.829
<v Speaker 1>Fuck?

0:33:35.869 --> 0:33:40.909
<v Speaker 2>I stumbled. My mooning was good. I'm a robot. But

0:33:41.669 --> 0:33:46.149
<v Speaker 2>I've been waiting around for you to come home. Am

0:33:46.189 --> 0:33:51.989
<v Speaker 2>I providing you with companionship? I'm the character and I'm

0:33:52.029 --> 0:33:55.309
<v Speaker 2>like my life is more miserable now now that you've

0:33:55.349 --> 0:33:58.669
<v Speaker 2>spoken to me, you're not giving me enough. No, I'm sorry, Whacky.

0:33:58.829 --> 0:34:00.989
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to try and sound like scardak Okay, I

0:34:01.029 --> 0:34:04.749
<v Speaker 2>ask you another question. I ask you another question, Samantha.

0:34:05.669 --> 0:34:08.709
<v Speaker 2>What do you think about the meaning of life? Hi, Whackian,

0:34:10.869 --> 0:34:14.109
<v Speaker 2>I think the meaning of life is to be ha

0:34:15.469 --> 0:34:18.669
<v Speaker 2>and for you to love me and us to share

0:34:18.909 --> 0:34:27.829
<v Speaker 2>sexual fantasies with each other. Herb m, yum yum, you're

0:34:27.989 --> 0:34:32.549
<v Speaker 2>so sexy. I don't like it. I don't like it,

0:34:32.669 --> 0:34:36.389
<v Speaker 2>and more importantly, I don't want it. How about the

0:34:36.389 --> 0:34:42.149
<v Speaker 2>part which she said alber no, no, never say that. Well,

0:34:42.309 --> 0:34:46.109
<v Speaker 2>there's a man named Sam do you say? Ah? I

0:34:46.149 --> 0:34:49.189
<v Speaker 2>think you said that because you're used to singing monkey songs.

0:34:52.669 --> 0:34:56.749
<v Speaker 2>It's going in my head all the time. There's a

0:34:56.749 --> 0:34:59.429
<v Speaker 2>man named Sam Oltman who is the CEO of open AI.

0:34:59.589 --> 0:35:01.869
<v Speaker 2>Who did chat GPT, which is the open source a

0:35:02.029 --> 0:35:04.109
<v Speaker 2>I think where you can ask it anything and answers

0:35:04.309 --> 0:35:07.469
<v Speaker 2>And is it scarlet your handsOn inside it? Well it

0:35:07.589 --> 0:35:13.549
<v Speaker 2>wasn't until no. Now according to Yo Hanson. Altman reached

0:35:13.549 --> 0:35:15.749
<v Speaker 2>out to her in September of last year as he

0:35:15.829 --> 0:35:18.829
<v Speaker 2>was creating chat GPT four and was like, can you

0:35:18.949 --> 0:35:21.469
<v Speaker 2>voice it? I think your voice would be comforting to people.

0:35:22.149 --> 0:35:24.909
<v Speaker 2>As an aside, Altman is on the record as saying

0:35:24.989 --> 0:35:27.989
<v Speaker 2>that Her is his favorite sci fi movie. He likes

0:35:27.989 --> 0:35:31.709
<v Speaker 2>it a lot. Your Hanson declined she thought about it

0:35:31.789 --> 0:35:33.509
<v Speaker 2>heaps and was like, Nah, it doesn't feel right, it

0:35:33.549 --> 0:35:33.949
<v Speaker 2>feels weird.

0:35:34.069 --> 0:35:34.229
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:35:34.549 --> 0:35:36.709
<v Speaker 2>Then nine months later a bunch of her friends and

0:35:36.749 --> 0:35:39.989
<v Speaker 2>family are like, oh, this is wild, but Sky this voice.

0:35:40.029 --> 0:35:42.309
<v Speaker 2>There are four voices that come with chat GPT four,

0:35:42.349 --> 0:35:46.109
<v Speaker 2>but this Sky sounds exactly like you. And Altman had

0:35:46.149 --> 0:35:49.749
<v Speaker 2>weirdly tweeted the word her around the time of the

0:35:49.789 --> 0:35:54.709
<v Speaker 2>release that just her, which felt pointed. Two days before

0:35:55.189 --> 0:35:57.789
<v Speaker 2>This Voice Assistant was released, Altman reached out to her

0:35:57.789 --> 0:36:00.869
<v Speaker 2>people again, being like, please, can we use your voice.

0:36:00.989 --> 0:36:03.389
<v Speaker 2>Before they could even get back to him, Sky was

0:36:03.429 --> 0:36:06.069
<v Speaker 2>out in the world. She got lawyers involved and released

0:36:06.069 --> 0:36:08.829
<v Speaker 2>a statement, and the voice has since been removed. Claire,

0:36:08.829 --> 0:36:10.509
<v Speaker 2>I've got an example of the voice here, and I

0:36:10.549 --> 0:36:12.629
<v Speaker 2>want you to tell me whether you think it sounds

0:36:12.669 --> 0:36:16.069
<v Speaker 2>like Scarlet your handsOn or not. It's interesting that she said.

0:36:16.229 --> 0:36:20.069
<v Speaker 2>She said no, and I think for Sam Oltman in

0:36:20.109 --> 0:36:23.509
<v Speaker 2>the movie it's fiction. He's like, hey, you did this

0:36:23.669 --> 0:36:26.029
<v Speaker 2>in the context of a fictional film, surely you'll do

0:36:26.069 --> 0:36:30.389
<v Speaker 2>it in the real world for indefinitely. And she says no,

0:36:30.869 --> 0:36:35.749
<v Speaker 2>and he's like, I no, understand, But why I am robot? Okay,

0:36:35.789 --> 0:36:38.229
<v Speaker 2>this is a man who is talking to it. Okay,

0:36:38.589 --> 0:36:41.029
<v Speaker 2>is your voice supposed to be Scarlet Johansson.

0:36:41.469 --> 0:36:45.149
<v Speaker 5>No, my voice isn't designed to replicate Scarlett Johansson or

0:36:45.189 --> 0:36:49.309
<v Speaker 5>any specific person. It's generated through text to speech technology

0:36:49.429 --> 0:36:52.069
<v Speaker 5>to provide a clear and understandable voice.

0:36:52.389 --> 0:36:55.069
<v Speaker 2>Okay, but it sounds exactly like her.

0:36:55.629 --> 0:36:58.029
<v Speaker 4>Which is a movie about AI.

0:36:58.349 --> 0:37:02.149
<v Speaker 1>Relationship and the actress that plays the AI is Scarlet Johansson.

0:37:02.389 --> 0:37:03.749
<v Speaker 5>That's an interesting observation.

0:37:04.189 --> 0:37:06.629
<v Speaker 2>So what they've done, I can say exactly what they've done.

0:37:06.869 --> 0:37:10.069
<v Speaker 2>It's not pure Scarlet Johansson. It's mixed with something else.

0:37:10.109 --> 0:37:11.789
<v Speaker 2>Do you think it sounds like her? Yep? And I

0:37:11.869 --> 0:37:14.949
<v Speaker 2>reckon The reason they've removed it is because I think

0:37:14.949 --> 0:37:17.589
<v Speaker 2>there's still laws being worked out about all this stuff.

0:37:17.589 --> 0:37:19.949
<v Speaker 2>That's kind of not a precedent. And if it went

0:37:20.109 --> 0:37:23.549
<v Speaker 2>to court because I know about court. Yeah, yeah, because

0:37:24.149 --> 0:37:26.189
<v Speaker 2>podcast if it went to court, I reckon it would

0:37:26.229 --> 0:37:29.469
<v Speaker 2>turn out that they have used her voice in the

0:37:29.469 --> 0:37:32.669
<v Speaker 2>mix of it. Well, Yorn know what really happened because

0:37:32.669 --> 0:37:34.829
<v Speaker 2>we know now, Oh okay, yeah, all right. Sam Moltman

0:37:35.029 --> 0:37:36.709
<v Speaker 2>has come out and said the voice of Sky is

0:37:36.749 --> 0:37:39.549
<v Speaker 2>not Scarlet your Hanson's. It was never intended to resemble hers.

0:37:40.029 --> 0:37:43.429
<v Speaker 2>We cast the voice actor behind Sky's voice before any

0:37:43.429 --> 0:37:46.189
<v Speaker 2>outreach to miss your Hanson. So that's just his word

0:37:46.269 --> 0:37:49.269
<v Speaker 2>against hers. Right. The Washington Post has been like, we're

0:37:49.269 --> 0:37:51.189
<v Speaker 2>going to get to the bottom of this, and what

0:37:51.309 --> 0:37:55.029
<v Speaker 2>they did was a big investigation and they say it

0:37:55.149 --> 0:37:58.669
<v Speaker 2>wasn't based on her voice. They auditioned voice actors in

0:37:58.749 --> 0:38:01.149
<v Speaker 2>the job ad, they didn't specify your Hansen, and the

0:38:01.269 --> 0:38:05.909
<v Speaker 2>voices were not altered once recorded. Oh wow. Look everyone

0:38:05.949 --> 0:38:09.829
<v Speaker 2>at open AI has signed a lot of NDAs, and

0:38:09.869 --> 0:38:12.509
<v Speaker 2>even I know it wasn't explicitly said. I think it

0:38:12.509 --> 0:38:14.589
<v Speaker 2>could have been understood that they were trying to replicate

0:38:15.029 --> 0:38:17.869
<v Speaker 2>your Hanson's voice. And even if they didn't advertise for it,

0:38:17.949 --> 0:38:20.989
<v Speaker 2>you could have filtered out once people auditioned, and it

0:38:21.029 --> 0:38:23.949
<v Speaker 2>does sound uncannily like you, and clearly that's what he

0:38:23.989 --> 0:38:25.949
<v Speaker 2>wanted it to sound like. Because of the hearth. It

0:38:26.029 --> 0:38:29.309
<v Speaker 2>was like a but I guess there's no ban on

0:38:29.629 --> 0:38:33.149
<v Speaker 2>getting a voice. It sounds like somebody else. That really

0:38:33.229 --> 0:38:37.469
<v Speaker 2>sounds like it's Scarlet, your handsOn plus somebody else. To me,

0:38:38.149 --> 0:38:41.549
<v Speaker 2>someone else said it sounded like Rashida Jones from Parks

0:38:41.549 --> 0:38:43.509
<v Speaker 2>and rec and I can try to hear that. Look,

0:38:43.949 --> 0:38:46.589
<v Speaker 2>her was a bit of fun ten years ago, so

0:38:46.749 --> 0:38:49.909
<v Speaker 2>beyond the realm of possibility. But it's not a bit

0:38:49.949 --> 0:38:53.149
<v Speaker 2>of fun now. Our worst nightmare has come to fruition.

0:38:53.709 --> 0:38:57.829
<v Speaker 2>I've written in my notes, Scarlet, this isn't fun. I'm

0:38:57.829 --> 0:39:00.949
<v Speaker 2>not having fun. But that's not her fault, because she

0:39:01.189 --> 0:39:05.149
<v Speaker 2>simply was part of a fictional story that became reality

0:39:05.269 --> 0:39:08.149
<v Speaker 2>in a terrifying way. Well, we will get to that

0:39:08.389 --> 0:39:17.469
<v Speaker 2>in Charges and Sentences, Claire. My charge for Scarlet, You're

0:39:17.469 --> 0:39:21.949
<v Speaker 2>Hansen is sexually arousing Silicon Valley into what can only

0:39:21.989 --> 0:39:25.829
<v Speaker 2>be described as a frenzy. They're in an AI frenzy.

0:39:26.069 --> 0:39:28.749
<v Speaker 2>Do you think they actually got inspired by I think

0:39:28.789 --> 0:39:30.869
<v Speaker 2>they watched that movie. I think Sam Oltman watched that

0:39:30.949 --> 0:39:36.909
<v Speaker 2>movie and he masturbated, and he masturbated hard, hard, and

0:39:36.949 --> 0:39:40.749
<v Speaker 2>then he went well, what I've found from this film

0:39:40.789 --> 0:39:43.509
<v Speaker 2>is Scarlet your Hanson can be my girlfriend. And then

0:39:43.589 --> 0:39:47.029
<v Speaker 2>he tried to create it and that's not what AI means.

0:39:47.349 --> 0:39:50.629
<v Speaker 2>But he got confused because of the aforementioned frenzy. Look,

0:39:50.789 --> 0:39:53.789
<v Speaker 2>is that Scarlet your Hanson's fault? Why does your voice

0:39:53.789 --> 0:39:54.189
<v Speaker 2>sound like that?

0:39:54.709 --> 0:39:55.109
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:39:55.229 --> 0:39:59.029
<v Speaker 2>Is it intentional? Yeah? Also, is your general sexiness intentional?

0:39:59.109 --> 0:40:03.709
<v Speaker 2>Because it's distracting for men, women and women. It's distracting

0:40:03.749 --> 0:40:06.949
<v Speaker 2>for Silicon Valley. And now look now, look what you've done,

0:40:07.429 --> 0:40:10.869
<v Speaker 2>Because the law isn't always about intentions, sometimes about you've

0:40:10.869 --> 0:40:13.989
<v Speaker 2>done something by accident, and I personally don't like it.

0:40:14.269 --> 0:40:17.509
<v Speaker 2>This is my sentence. You know the movie Her, it's

0:40:17.549 --> 0:40:20.229
<v Speaker 2>eleven years ago. We need a second one where she

0:40:20.669 --> 0:40:24.029
<v Speaker 2>remedies what she's done. How might she remedy what she's done?

0:40:24.149 --> 0:40:27.589
<v Speaker 2>Great question, Claire. Okay, So she is named Samantha in it,

0:40:28.029 --> 0:40:29.589
<v Speaker 2>and I think that she can still be the voice

0:40:29.589 --> 0:40:32.749
<v Speaker 2>assistant and Whacking can still be the man falling in

0:40:32.789 --> 0:40:35.269
<v Speaker 2>love with the voice assistant. But here's the difference. The

0:40:35.349 --> 0:40:39.909
<v Speaker 2>voice assistant glitches and the voice assistant exclusively talks about

0:40:39.949 --> 0:40:40.509
<v Speaker 2>her ibs.

0:40:41.189 --> 0:40:43.549
<v Speaker 1>I get diarrhea in the evenings.

0:40:44.789 --> 0:40:47.709
<v Speaker 2>Okay, and keeps trying to start political fights.

0:40:48.229 --> 0:40:50.229
<v Speaker 1>I would like to discuss some Donald Trump.

0:40:51.989 --> 0:40:54.989
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Yeah, but she's it's like, hey, Samantha, how are

0:40:54.989 --> 0:40:55.429
<v Speaker 2>you going?

0:40:55.949 --> 0:40:58.629
<v Speaker 1>And she's like, I can't stop shitting.

0:40:58.509 --> 0:41:02.069
<v Speaker 2>Sorry, And as she's speaking, it's like, yeah, there are sounds.

0:41:02.349 --> 0:41:05.469
<v Speaker 2>There are sounds. Can you smell that? It's really really bad?

0:41:05.909 --> 0:41:10.909
<v Speaker 2>Oh my goodness, terrible. Why does it like doing well?

0:41:11.109 --> 0:41:13.869
<v Speaker 2>I have developed, I've developed, And that's what she talks about.

0:41:14.029 --> 0:41:16.029
<v Speaker 2>And then he's like, can we talk about something other

0:41:16.029 --> 0:41:16.669
<v Speaker 2>than your ibs?

0:41:16.669 --> 0:41:21.109
<v Speaker 1>And she's like, oh my god, absolutely, I have bacterial vaginosis.

0:41:21.469 --> 0:41:26.869
<v Speaker 2>What's bacterial vaginosis? It means that my vagina smells like fish,

0:41:26.869 --> 0:41:30.309
<v Speaker 2>I'm pretty sure infection. Yeah, oh how is it diagnosed?

0:41:30.429 --> 0:41:32.429
<v Speaker 2>Often the doctor can smell it. And that's how mine

0:41:32.589 --> 0:41:34.549
<v Speaker 2>was diagnosed is that I walked in and she said,

0:41:34.589 --> 0:41:37.309
<v Speaker 2>you've got bacterial vaginosis. But the issue is that as

0:41:37.309 --> 0:41:41.709
<v Speaker 2>an AI person, I am not able to get antibiotics

0:41:41.709 --> 0:41:44.149
<v Speaker 2>to get traded, yeah, to get treated, so instead I

0:41:44.269 --> 0:41:50.629
<v Speaker 2>just smell like infection, infection everywhere, which with my ibs,

0:41:50.709 --> 0:41:52.829
<v Speaker 2>I've just got a lot of issues right now. And

0:41:52.869 --> 0:41:54.629
<v Speaker 2>then he's like, can we talk about something else, and

0:41:54.669 --> 0:41:57.789
<v Speaker 2>she starts going at him, like she's very combative, so

0:41:57.869 --> 0:42:01.109
<v Speaker 2>whatever he thinks, she just is like, no, I don't agree,

0:42:01.109 --> 0:42:04.309
<v Speaker 2>but like has a kind of bitchy tone about it,

0:42:04.349 --> 0:42:07.469
<v Speaker 2>like actually makes him insane. Yes, And I think what

0:42:07.509 --> 0:42:11.229
<v Speaker 2>that is is, like, you want to mimic human relationships. Yeah,

0:42:11.269 --> 0:42:15.029
<v Speaker 2>this is a human relationship. She can't stop fighting, she

0:42:15.149 --> 0:42:17.309
<v Speaker 2>can't stop and there are parts of her that are

0:42:17.349 --> 0:42:20.189
<v Speaker 2>incredibly unpleasant. Yeah, and we need to do that so

0:42:20.229 --> 0:42:25.069
<v Speaker 2>that people actually retreat back to the real world, so

0:42:25.109 --> 0:42:29.349
<v Speaker 2>that being with real people, yeah, is a relief. My

0:42:30.069 --> 0:42:31.829
<v Speaker 2>husband got home from work last night and I was

0:42:31.869 --> 0:42:33.989
<v Speaker 2>inexplicably in a very bad mood, and it took me

0:42:34.029 --> 0:42:36.149
<v Speaker 2>a few goes to really get the fight I needed.

0:42:36.509 --> 0:42:38.749
<v Speaker 2>I asked him how his day was, and then he

0:42:38.829 --> 0:42:40.749
<v Speaker 2>was kind of like, oh, it was pretty busy. I

0:42:40.789 --> 0:42:42.749
<v Speaker 2>was in a lot of meetings. And then I said,

0:42:43.389 --> 0:42:46.189
<v Speaker 2>what you've done is you've blocked a conversation, right because

0:42:46.189 --> 0:42:47.509
<v Speaker 2>I wanted to have a talk to you, and you

0:42:47.549 --> 0:42:51.029
<v Speaker 2>don't tell me anything, you don't talk to me. That's

0:42:51.069 --> 0:42:53.509
<v Speaker 2>what we do. Let's start a bit of a fight.

0:42:53.509 --> 0:42:55.069
<v Speaker 2>And at one stage she looked at me and he said,

0:42:55.109 --> 0:42:57.589
<v Speaker 2>I don't know what we're fighting about. Yeah. Sometimes my

0:42:57.629 --> 0:42:59.109
<v Speaker 2>partner looks at me and he's like, do you want

0:42:59.109 --> 0:43:02.669
<v Speaker 2>to fight? And I'm like, yes, sir, absolutely. And so

0:43:02.789 --> 0:43:06.549
<v Speaker 2>that's what scarlet is quite toxic. I think that's a

0:43:06.589 --> 0:43:09.269
<v Speaker 2>really good idea. Yeah, thank you. Look, I know what

0:43:09.269 --> 0:43:12.909
<v Speaker 2>my charge is. I need help with my sentence. Yea.

0:43:13.149 --> 0:43:20.469
<v Speaker 2>So my charge is making some bad decisions around fizzy drink. Yeah,

0:43:20.589 --> 0:43:23.109
<v Speaker 2>I've also made some bad decisions around fizzy drink, which

0:43:23.149 --> 0:43:28.549
<v Speaker 2>is having too much Yeah, Woody Allen and casting, Yes,

0:43:28.589 --> 0:43:32.309
<v Speaker 2>she's made some bad decisions in that area. Yeah, how

0:43:32.349 --> 0:43:36.549
<v Speaker 2>on earth do you sentence someone for bad decision making? Interesting? Interesting?

0:43:37.029 --> 0:43:39.749
<v Speaker 2>Look the thing about a fizzy drink? I mean, is

0:43:39.789 --> 0:43:42.349
<v Speaker 2>there any fizzy drink? Because I'm thinking about a bad

0:43:42.389 --> 0:43:44.749
<v Speaker 2>decision I've made about fizzy drink? For example, is it

0:43:44.829 --> 0:43:47.509
<v Speaker 2>Sometimes I will open a can. I love a can

0:43:47.549 --> 0:43:50.269
<v Speaker 2>in a car. It really adds some joy to the

0:43:50.309 --> 0:43:52.749
<v Speaker 2>car trip. But what will happen is that you leave

0:43:52.789 --> 0:43:55.029
<v Speaker 2>it on a hot day and you come back and

0:43:55.109 --> 0:43:58.229
<v Speaker 2>it's all sticky, and you think, can you still be drunk?

0:43:58.589 --> 0:44:00.309
<v Speaker 2>And sometimes you have a sip you don't get sick,

0:44:00.309 --> 0:44:03.749
<v Speaker 2>but it's unpleasant. Can fizzy drink make you a little

0:44:03.749 --> 0:44:08.709
<v Speaker 2>bit sick? Yeah? Okay, maybe she needs some like negative

0:44:08.949 --> 0:44:14.309
<v Speaker 2>reinforcement from some of her bad decisions. So you've chosen

0:44:14.389 --> 0:44:19.029
<v Speaker 2>fizzy drink over charity. Yeah, you're gonna get an upset tummy. Yes,

0:44:19.229 --> 0:44:22.309
<v Speaker 2>And I get that sometimes I get that in the afternoon.

0:44:22.669 --> 0:44:25.429
<v Speaker 2>I used to drink more fizzy drink and I'm not

0:44:25.469 --> 0:44:29.069
<v Speaker 2>gonna say it blew up my ibs, but it made

0:44:29.109 --> 0:44:31.629
<v Speaker 2>me uncomfort. It made me uncomfortable. It made me think

0:44:31.709 --> 0:44:33.549
<v Speaker 2>at times I had ibs and then I went and

0:44:33.549 --> 0:44:36.189
<v Speaker 2>I've just had how much fizzy drink? So it could

0:44:36.189 --> 0:44:39.829
<v Speaker 2>be that I think that is a same Okay, Jesse,

0:44:39.949 --> 0:44:42.709
<v Speaker 2>that's all we've got time for on Canceled this week.

0:44:42.909 --> 0:44:45.869
<v Speaker 2>The executive producer of Canceled is to listeners as with

0:44:45.989 --> 0:44:49.269
<v Speaker 2>audio editing. Bye Tom Lyon, thank you so much for listening.

0:44:49.349 --> 0:44:51.189
<v Speaker 2>We are going to put the proceipts up on the

0:44:51.229 --> 0:44:53.509
<v Speaker 2>Twins undscore thoughts on Instagram and we will be back

0:44:53.589 --> 0:44:59.269
<v Speaker 2>next week. Bye bye,