WEBVTT - Decoding Kate's Comeback & That Bridgerton Sex Scene

0:00:10.327 --> 0:00:13.047
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to a MoMA Mia podcast.

0:00:13.727 --> 0:00:16.767
<v Speaker 2>Mamma mea acknowledges the traditional owners of land and waters

0:00:16.807 --> 0:00:23.767
<v Speaker 2>that this podcast is recorded on Hello and welcome to

0:00:23.847 --> 0:00:26.647
<v Speaker 2>Mamma Mia Out Loud. What women are actually talking about

0:00:26.687 --> 0:00:30.767
<v Speaker 2>on Monday, the seventeenth of June. I am Holly Wainwright, I'm.

0:00:30.527 --> 0:00:34.087
<v Speaker 3>Mea Friedman and I'm Jemma Bath filling in for Jesse Stevens.

0:00:34.127 --> 0:00:35.927
<v Speaker 3>I host another podcast from Mamma.

0:00:35.727 --> 0:00:40.327
<v Speaker 1>Mia called True Crab Conversations. It's less murders on this show. Yes, good,

0:00:40.367 --> 0:00:40.967
<v Speaker 1>that's a good thing.

0:00:43.207 --> 0:00:47.567
<v Speaker 2>And on the show today a Princess's brave face, the

0:00:47.687 --> 0:00:51.367
<v Speaker 2>very planned optics of Kate's return to work. And it's

0:00:51.367 --> 0:00:53.607
<v Speaker 2>a fact it's never been harder to be the thirty

0:00:53.647 --> 0:00:57.207
<v Speaker 2>something in Australia. But also millennials are about to get really,

0:00:57.407 --> 0:01:01.207
<v Speaker 2>really rich. And what's different about the sex scenes you

0:01:01.247 --> 0:01:04.087
<v Speaker 2>spent the weekend watching? But first, Jemma Bath.

0:01:04.727 --> 0:01:07.007
<v Speaker 3>In case you missed it, a name that might be

0:01:07.087 --> 0:01:10.847
<v Speaker 3>familiar to you, Bruce Werman. He's expected to appear in

0:01:10.847 --> 0:01:14.887
<v Speaker 3>a Toomber court today for a committal hearing over rape charges.

0:01:15.567 --> 0:01:18.407
<v Speaker 3>He's been charged with two counts of rape dating back

0:01:18.487 --> 0:01:21.687
<v Speaker 3>to October twenty twenty one. Now we don't know the

0:01:21.687 --> 0:01:24.527
<v Speaker 3>identity of his accuser, but we know that she is

0:01:24.567 --> 0:01:27.367
<v Speaker 3>twenty nine and she allegedly met Lehman at a strip

0:01:27.407 --> 0:01:29.567
<v Speaker 3>club in his hometown of Toowoomba.

0:01:29.847 --> 0:01:31.687
<v Speaker 1>She says he gave her a.

0:01:31.727 --> 0:01:36.647
<v Speaker 3>False name, Bryce, pretty close to Bruce, and she alleges

0:01:36.807 --> 0:01:38.767
<v Speaker 3>that they left the club and went to a friend's

0:01:38.767 --> 0:01:42.167
<v Speaker 3>house and got into bed together. She told him they

0:01:42.167 --> 0:01:44.807
<v Speaker 3>wouldn't be having sex without a condom. They kissed and

0:01:44.847 --> 0:01:48.167
<v Speaker 3>she fell asleep. She claims when she woke up, he

0:01:48.287 --> 0:01:50.607
<v Speaker 3>was having sex with her, and says the next day

0:01:50.647 --> 0:01:53.687
<v Speaker 3>he took her to get a morning after pill. Originally,

0:01:53.727 --> 0:01:56.047
<v Speaker 3>when this story broke, Lehman was only referred to as

0:01:56.047 --> 0:01:59.847
<v Speaker 3>a high profile man in media reports. That Queensland laws

0:01:59.927 --> 0:02:02.287
<v Speaker 3>changed in October last year which allowed.

0:02:02.087 --> 0:02:03.047
<v Speaker 1>Us to name him.

0:02:03.567 --> 0:02:05.407
<v Speaker 3>This is the first time he's appeared in court in

0:02:05.447 --> 0:02:08.887
<v Speaker 3>person for this matter, and basically this hearing will decide

0:02:08.967 --> 0:02:11.407
<v Speaker 3>whether the chargers will be taken to trial.

0:02:11.647 --> 0:02:14.767
<v Speaker 2>That sounds you can hear is me Mia and Jebba

0:02:14.767 --> 0:02:16.887
<v Speaker 2>biding our tongues just a little bit. And if you're

0:02:16.927 --> 0:02:18.807
<v Speaker 2>wondering if there should have been any more details in

0:02:18.847 --> 0:02:27.247
<v Speaker 2>that segment. There are legal reasons why there aren't in

0:02:27.367 --> 0:02:31.487
<v Speaker 2>last week's chaotic Royal rundown. I told you, gentle listeners,

0:02:31.727 --> 0:02:35.447
<v Speaker 2>as out Loud's Fancy Society correspondent as I am, that

0:02:35.647 --> 0:02:38.807
<v Speaker 2>Kate watch was back. It had been three months since

0:02:38.887 --> 0:02:42.127
<v Speaker 2>those edited pictures of the Princess of Wales had made

0:02:42.207 --> 0:02:45.807
<v Speaker 2>photo experts of the entire world, and we were getting restless.

0:02:46.207 --> 0:02:48.967
<v Speaker 2>How is she going as she goes through her cancer treatment.

0:02:49.927 --> 0:02:52.967
<v Speaker 2>Kate listened clearly to MEA's gentle urging for an update

0:02:53.007 --> 0:02:56.247
<v Speaker 2>on her health, and on Friday night, Our Time, the

0:02:56.247 --> 0:02:59.407
<v Speaker 2>Prince and Princess of Wales's official Instagram account released an

0:02:59.407 --> 0:03:02.527
<v Speaker 2>image of Kate forest bathing, which is walking in the.

0:03:02.447 --> 0:03:04.087
<v Speaker 1>Woods with some news.

0:03:04.527 --> 0:03:07.727
<v Speaker 2>She said, I am making good progress, but as anyone

0:03:07.767 --> 0:03:10.167
<v Speaker 2>going through chemotherapy will know, there are good days and

0:03:10.207 --> 0:03:13.447
<v Speaker 2>bad days. On those bad days, you feel weak, tired

0:03:13.527 --> 0:03:15.767
<v Speaker 2>and you have to give into your body resting. But

0:03:15.887 --> 0:03:18.167
<v Speaker 2>on the good days, when you feel stronger, you want

0:03:18.207 --> 0:03:20.447
<v Speaker 2>to make the most of feeling well. My treatment is

0:03:20.447 --> 0:03:22.847
<v Speaker 2>ongoing and will be for a few more months. On

0:03:22.887 --> 0:03:24.767
<v Speaker 2>the days I feel well enough, it's a joy to

0:03:24.847 --> 0:03:27.767
<v Speaker 2>engage with school life spend personal time on the things

0:03:27.767 --> 0:03:30.687
<v Speaker 2>that give me energy and positivity, as well as starting

0:03:30.687 --> 0:03:33.447
<v Speaker 2>to do a little work from home. I'm looking forward

0:03:33.527 --> 0:03:36.647
<v Speaker 2>to attending the King's Birthday parade this weekend with my family,

0:03:36.967 --> 0:03:39.407
<v Speaker 2>and I hope to join a few public engagements over

0:03:39.447 --> 0:03:42.167
<v Speaker 2>the summer, but equally knowing I'm not out of the

0:03:42.167 --> 0:03:47.167
<v Speaker 2>woods yet. Catherine was coming back to work, and she

0:03:47.287 --> 0:03:50.207
<v Speaker 2>did less than twenty four hours later in her first

0:03:50.207 --> 0:03:53.047
<v Speaker 2>official appearance, that is an appearance not in a paparazzi

0:03:53.047 --> 0:03:57.207
<v Speaker 2>photo taken with a long lens since Christmas. The next day,

0:03:57.247 --> 0:03:59.487
<v Speaker 2>you would have had to be entirely out of Wi

0:03:59.527 --> 0:04:01.807
<v Speaker 2>Fi range to have missed the photos of her attending

0:04:01.887 --> 0:04:04.127
<v Speaker 2>the Trooping of the Color, which is the King's birthday,

0:04:04.207 --> 0:04:05.567
<v Speaker 2>big deal in England.

0:04:05.607 --> 0:04:06.407
<v Speaker 1>It's like a big.

0:04:06.247 --> 0:04:09.607
<v Speaker 2>Military parade, and Prince William was in the parade. He

0:04:09.647 --> 0:04:11.727
<v Speaker 2>was on a horse in one of those big furry hats.

0:04:11.727 --> 0:04:14.567
<v Speaker 2>Don't ask me what all that means. Kate looked immaculate,

0:04:14.807 --> 0:04:17.887
<v Speaker 2>healthy and happy, riding in a carriage with her kids

0:04:17.927 --> 0:04:20.447
<v Speaker 2>and doing the traditional balcony appearance where she was given

0:04:20.527 --> 0:04:24.047
<v Speaker 2>prime position next to the King. It would have been knackering,

0:04:24.327 --> 0:04:28.327
<v Speaker 2>no question, but Kate's appearance was roundly received as a

0:04:28.367 --> 0:04:32.127
<v Speaker 2>reassuring and joyous display that one of the most famous

0:04:32.127 --> 0:04:35.647
<v Speaker 2>women in the world is okay. The thing is, of course,

0:04:35.647 --> 0:04:38.207
<v Speaker 2>she's not quite okay, as she says so herself, some

0:04:38.407 --> 0:04:42.527
<v Speaker 2>days she's shit, although she didn't put it quite like that. Mia,

0:04:42.647 --> 0:04:44.687
<v Speaker 2>did you love Kate's brave face.

0:04:45.407 --> 0:04:49.647
<v Speaker 4>I'm so overjoyed, first of all, to see her face.

0:04:49.887 --> 0:04:51.887
<v Speaker 4>And I know that it sounded silly when I was

0:04:51.927 --> 0:04:55.207
<v Speaker 4>saying last week, I'm just on an update. The parasocial

0:04:55.287 --> 0:04:58.167
<v Speaker 4>relationship we have with people in the public eye who

0:04:58.207 --> 0:05:01.727
<v Speaker 4>we feel we know is a real thing. I mean,

0:05:01.767 --> 0:05:05.167
<v Speaker 4>the relationships not real, but the fact that we care

0:05:05.207 --> 0:05:08.087
<v Speaker 4>for them and we want them to be okay. I

0:05:08.087 --> 0:05:11.327
<v Speaker 4>mean not everybody does, but some of us do. I

0:05:11.567 --> 0:05:14.767
<v Speaker 4>scrutinized her more than I've ever scrutinized anyone in a

0:05:14.767 --> 0:05:19.167
<v Speaker 4>public appearance, and I was very observant of myself doing that.

0:05:19.767 --> 0:05:23.087
<v Speaker 4>I thought the fact that she wore a very fitted

0:05:23.407 --> 0:05:27.687
<v Speaker 4>white dress or white suit was very interesting, and what

0:05:27.767 --> 0:05:30.367
<v Speaker 4>I realized is HARKing back to something that I read

0:05:30.527 --> 0:05:33.407
<v Speaker 4>a few months ago. When she disappeared. That first photo

0:05:33.487 --> 0:05:36.367
<v Speaker 4>came out and turned out to be airbrushed, and there's

0:05:36.407 --> 0:05:39.727
<v Speaker 4>this sense of when the only access you have to

0:05:39.847 --> 0:05:42.447
<v Speaker 4>someone is looking at them, which is the case pretty

0:05:42.487 --> 0:05:44.567
<v Speaker 4>much for the royal family. Right, we don't know really

0:05:44.567 --> 0:05:47.247
<v Speaker 4>anything about them. We just know essentially what they look

0:05:47.367 --> 0:05:50.327
<v Speaker 4>like and what they choose to tell us. So we

0:05:50.487 --> 0:05:52.967
<v Speaker 4>have to draw a lot of conclusions from what they wear,

0:05:53.687 --> 0:05:56.807
<v Speaker 4>what their body looks like, what their facial expressions are,

0:05:56.847 --> 0:05:59.967
<v Speaker 4>and now of course lip readers. And there's something about

0:05:59.967 --> 0:06:03.047
<v Speaker 4>being a princess more than anything else, that their value

0:06:03.487 --> 0:06:09.647
<v Speaker 4>is in their physicality. It's in literally showing up bodily

0:06:10.487 --> 0:06:17.327
<v Speaker 4>for events, for official things, bringing attention to charities, And

0:06:17.367 --> 0:06:21.047
<v Speaker 4>so the burden of that, even when you don't have cancer,

0:06:21.047 --> 0:06:23.767
<v Speaker 4>in the whole world is not particularly looking at you

0:06:24.807 --> 0:06:28.527
<v Speaker 4>must be unimaginable. And all I could think about was

0:06:28.567 --> 0:06:30.927
<v Speaker 4>the pressure that she must have been under. And maybe

0:06:30.967 --> 0:06:32.607
<v Speaker 4>she was like, this is her job, So maybe she

0:06:32.687 --> 0:06:34.207
<v Speaker 4>was genuinely over joyed to be out of the house.

0:06:34.247 --> 0:06:36.247
<v Speaker 4>We've all been locked down with illness and we know

0:06:36.287 --> 0:06:39.087
<v Speaker 4>what that feels like. But I felt for all the

0:06:39.127 --> 0:06:43.407
<v Speaker 4>cancer sufferers, survivors, people who were battling it, who looked

0:06:43.407 --> 0:06:45.607
<v Speaker 4>at it and went ah.

0:06:45.527 --> 0:06:49.327
<v Speaker 3>Right, I felt Similarly, I have quite a few people

0:06:49.647 --> 0:06:52.687
<v Speaker 3>in my family and in my close circle that are

0:06:52.767 --> 0:06:55.127
<v Speaker 3>have just gotten through cancer treatment or are currently going

0:06:55.167 --> 0:06:58.007
<v Speaker 3>through it. And when I saw her, of course I

0:06:58.047 --> 0:07:01.687
<v Speaker 3>was happy for her the individual, but I felt a

0:07:01.687 --> 0:07:07.047
<v Speaker 3>bit sad for my family members at home, thinking I

0:07:07.087 --> 0:07:11.007
<v Speaker 3>don't look anything like that in fact, my body, my face,

0:07:11.447 --> 0:07:14.407
<v Speaker 3>my hair. I compare it to the beauty standards conversation

0:07:14.647 --> 0:07:19.047
<v Speaker 3>where we look at super skinny, beautiful women and we

0:07:19.127 --> 0:07:22.927
<v Speaker 3>compare ourselves to that and the expectations we put on that.

0:07:23.567 --> 0:07:27.047
<v Speaker 3>In the same sense, here cancer patients looking at her,

0:07:27.087 --> 0:07:30.047
<v Speaker 3>going yeah, well, if I don't look like that, am

0:07:30.087 --> 0:07:31.687
<v Speaker 3>I doing something wrong?

0:07:31.887 --> 0:07:32.767
<v Speaker 1>Letting the side down?

0:07:32.847 --> 0:07:35.367
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I hear that, and I have read it. There

0:07:35.407 --> 0:07:38.087
<v Speaker 2>was a comment in out loud as from somebody who

0:07:38.287 --> 0:07:40.967
<v Speaker 2>clearly felt similarly and not very understandably, who said, did

0:07:41.047 --> 0:07:43.687
<v Speaker 2>she get a special type of no hair loss, no grayskin,

0:07:43.847 --> 0:07:46.767
<v Speaker 2>no mouth soors chemo. Honestly, I wish her well, of

0:07:46.767 --> 0:07:48.327
<v Speaker 2>course she's a mom and a human being. But for

0:07:48.367 --> 0:07:51.087
<v Speaker 2>the cancer patients who lose every hair on their body

0:07:51.127 --> 0:07:53.967
<v Speaker 2>and think they'll never look human again, it seems demoralizing,

0:07:54.047 --> 0:07:57.887
<v Speaker 2>not inspiring, And I thought that was really interesting and

0:07:57.967 --> 0:08:00.247
<v Speaker 2>of course entirely valid. But what a lot of people

0:08:00.247 --> 0:08:04.367
<v Speaker 2>have pointed out is that chemotherapy is not one experience

0:08:04.447 --> 0:08:08.047
<v Speaker 2>for everybody, and there are plenty of ordinary in inverted

0:08:08.087 --> 0:08:11.407
<v Speaker 2>commas have to work through chemo. A lot of women do,

0:08:11.687 --> 0:08:14.047
<v Speaker 2>un men, obviously, but we're talking about women who have

0:08:14.167 --> 0:08:16.127
<v Speaker 2>to put on a brave face, as it were, not

0:08:16.207 --> 0:08:19.167
<v Speaker 2>to the Kate level, but to keep going, keep moving,

0:08:19.367 --> 0:08:21.647
<v Speaker 2>keep putting their foot forward. And I don't know, I

0:08:21.687 --> 0:08:25.127
<v Speaker 2>think I agree that in some ways it's like, oh,

0:08:25.167 --> 0:08:28.007
<v Speaker 2>but she looks fine, but I think she had no choice.

0:08:28.087 --> 0:08:30.727
<v Speaker 2>You've got to remember that to get her out of

0:08:30.727 --> 0:08:33.407
<v Speaker 2>the house that day. Whatever Kate looks like on an

0:08:33.487 --> 0:08:36.167
<v Speaker 2>ordinary Tuesday morning when she's finding it hard to get

0:08:36.207 --> 0:08:38.287
<v Speaker 2>out of bed, to get her out of that house

0:08:38.287 --> 0:08:41.127
<v Speaker 2>that day, she has a team. She has literally a team,

0:08:41.527 --> 0:08:44.087
<v Speaker 2>and their number one job would have been make Kate

0:08:44.167 --> 0:08:48.567
<v Speaker 2>look like Kate always looks, to reassure everybody that she

0:08:48.927 --> 0:08:50.727
<v Speaker 2>is fine. That shit holds.

0:08:51.127 --> 0:08:54.847
<v Speaker 4>That's what drives me crazy is this insistence that women,

0:08:54.887 --> 0:08:57.167
<v Speaker 4>no matter what we're going through, we've just had a baby,

0:08:57.327 --> 0:09:00.687
<v Speaker 4>we're pregnant, we're old, we're getting a hip replacement we're

0:09:00.807 --> 0:09:05.047
<v Speaker 4>undergoing chemo. We must look perfect, we must look the same,

0:09:05.407 --> 0:09:09.087
<v Speaker 4>We must be unchanged physically by any experience that happens

0:09:09.087 --> 0:09:09.167
<v Speaker 4>to you.

0:09:09.687 --> 0:09:12.247
<v Speaker 2>I don't think that's necessarily true of this, because I

0:09:12.287 --> 0:09:15.847
<v Speaker 2>think we really applaud people who publicly come out and

0:09:15.927 --> 0:09:19.447
<v Speaker 2>show their shaved heads or their masectomy scars.

0:09:19.007 --> 0:09:19.527
<v Speaker 1>Like we do.

0:09:19.567 --> 0:09:22.967
<v Speaker 2>We really applaud that because it reflects reality. But we're

0:09:22.967 --> 0:09:25.287
<v Speaker 2>not looking at the Royal family for reality. What this

0:09:25.407 --> 0:09:30.167
<v Speaker 2>whole very very stage managed return to work. I actually

0:09:30.207 --> 0:09:32.687
<v Speaker 2>think they've handled it brilliantly. I think that their team

0:09:32.727 --> 0:09:36.087
<v Speaker 2>has worked out all the messes that they made earlier

0:09:36.127 --> 0:09:39.007
<v Speaker 2>in the year when they were with the airbrush pictures,

0:09:39.047 --> 0:09:41.007
<v Speaker 2>and to give them benefit of the doubt, they're in

0:09:41.087 --> 0:09:44.847
<v Speaker 2>uncharted waters there. But this has been handled brilliantly, with

0:09:44.887 --> 0:09:47.927
<v Speaker 2>the announcement from Kate very quickly before it happened, so

0:09:47.967 --> 0:09:50.087
<v Speaker 2>there's not too much speculation to be able to build up.

0:09:50.447 --> 0:09:53.287
<v Speaker 2>But literally, her team would have been their brief would

0:09:53.287 --> 0:09:56.767
<v Speaker 2>have been, she needs to look perfect, and with that

0:09:56.887 --> 0:09:59.727
<v Speaker 2>amount of effort around you and all the hair pieces

0:09:59.727 --> 0:10:01.767
<v Speaker 2>in the world and all the makeup teams and the

0:10:01.807 --> 0:10:04.047
<v Speaker 2>cat anybody can look like.

0:10:04.007 --> 0:10:05.967
<v Speaker 1>That for a day. Can I clarify.

0:10:06.087 --> 0:10:09.887
<v Speaker 4>Also, none of what I'm saying is a criticism, it's observation,

0:10:10.487 --> 0:10:12.647
<v Speaker 4>and I think those two things it's really important to

0:10:12.647 --> 0:10:15.967
<v Speaker 4>make that distinction because it's like, she owes us nothing

0:10:16.247 --> 0:10:18.247
<v Speaker 4>in terms of could she have come out in a

0:10:18.247 --> 0:10:20.887
<v Speaker 4>headscarf and would she have done that, would she have

0:10:20.927 --> 0:10:23.407
<v Speaker 4>appeared in public if in fact she never had hair.

0:10:23.727 --> 0:10:26.367
<v Speaker 4>That is completely up to her to decide, and every

0:10:26.407 --> 0:10:29.127
<v Speaker 4>person has to make their own decisions. But I was

0:10:29.527 --> 0:10:33.807
<v Speaker 4>interested in this collective relief that you could feel that

0:10:33.967 --> 0:10:38.687
<v Speaker 4>Kate looks exactly the same and is completely unchanged. And

0:10:38.727 --> 0:10:41.407
<v Speaker 4>that was like reassuring for the masses, I guess on

0:10:41.447 --> 0:10:45.207
<v Speaker 4>some level, but frustrating from a beauty standards point of

0:10:45.287 --> 0:10:47.367
<v Speaker 4>view that we just never get a fucking break. But

0:10:47.447 --> 0:10:49.687
<v Speaker 4>that's why two truths can live in the same world.

0:10:50.007 --> 0:10:51.967
<v Speaker 4>We can be happy for Kate, but we can be

0:10:52.087 --> 0:10:54.607
<v Speaker 4>sad for the people that looked at her on the

0:10:54.647 --> 0:10:55.727
<v Speaker 4>weekend and struggled.

0:10:55.807 --> 0:10:58.527
<v Speaker 2>I don't think that's about beauty standards though. I don't

0:10:58.527 --> 0:11:00.647
<v Speaker 2>think it's about beauty standards. I think this is very

0:11:00.687 --> 0:11:04.327
<v Speaker 2>much about royals and about that very like at all times,

0:11:04.367 --> 0:11:07.007
<v Speaker 2>appearance is what matter. When you're royals, as you already

0:11:07.007 --> 0:11:09.487
<v Speaker 2>said me, or it's literally their job and they don't

0:11:09.487 --> 0:11:11.767
<v Speaker 2>want everybody to freak out. As we know, Royal family

0:11:11.807 --> 0:11:14.127
<v Speaker 2>are on sort of rocky ground at the moment on

0:11:14.247 --> 0:11:16.727
<v Speaker 2>all kinds of fronts, from the fact that they've lost

0:11:17.007 --> 0:11:18.967
<v Speaker 2>two very prominent members to the fact that the King

0:11:19.047 --> 0:11:22.087
<v Speaker 2>is unwell to the fact that the whole institution is

0:11:22.127 --> 0:11:24.967
<v Speaker 2>on the nose. I don't think that we should be

0:11:25.047 --> 0:11:28.047
<v Speaker 2>looking at this as a straight up beauty standard story.

0:11:28.087 --> 0:11:30.527
<v Speaker 2>This is very much about the image that they had

0:11:30.567 --> 0:11:33.527
<v Speaker 2>to project. It's not beyond the realms of possibility that

0:11:33.607 --> 0:11:36.407
<v Speaker 2>down the line we might get a photo release of

0:11:36.447 --> 0:11:39.567
<v Speaker 2>a very different version of Kate that's also very stage managed.

0:11:39.607 --> 0:11:41.447
<v Speaker 2>But the idea that she would go out on the

0:11:41.527 --> 0:11:45.527
<v Speaker 2>King's birthday looking anything other than how she looked is

0:11:45.607 --> 0:11:47.687
<v Speaker 2>kind of unimaginable in royal world.

0:11:47.607 --> 0:11:50.447
<v Speaker 4>It is, but that's what's depressing to me that if

0:11:50.447 --> 0:11:52.807
<v Speaker 4>she doesn't meet that beauty standard, and imagine how this

0:11:52.927 --> 0:11:55.447
<v Speaker 4>must feel for her, right she doesn't meet this beauty standard.

0:11:55.847 --> 0:12:03.327
<v Speaker 4>Best we stay indoors.

0:12:04.007 --> 0:12:04.887
<v Speaker 3>We're millennials.

0:12:04.967 --> 0:12:07.287
<v Speaker 1>We work hard and have nothing to show for it.

0:12:07.607 --> 0:12:09.847
<v Speaker 2>We're millennials, are dogs, have more.

0:12:09.687 --> 0:12:12.247
<v Speaker 4>Followers than you on Instagram from millennials.

0:12:12.327 --> 0:12:14.247
<v Speaker 1>We google it sixty times a day.

0:12:14.527 --> 0:12:17.647
<v Speaker 3>There's good and bad news for millennials this week. The

0:12:17.647 --> 0:12:21.127
<v Speaker 3>good news is we're potentially about to be really, really

0:12:21.367 --> 0:12:25.527
<v Speaker 3>rich over the next twenty years. Millennials are poised to

0:12:25.567 --> 0:12:29.567
<v Speaker 3>inherit ninety trillion dollars worth of assets and become the

0:12:29.727 --> 0:12:32.727
<v Speaker 3>richest generation in history according to the Wealth Report.

0:12:33.647 --> 0:12:35.727
<v Speaker 1>But it's by a few houses with that amount of money.

0:12:35.767 --> 0:12:39.367
<v Speaker 3>Holy but but but this will only be the case

0:12:39.407 --> 0:12:42.887
<v Speaker 3>for those who already come from affluent families, which could

0:12:42.887 --> 0:12:47.407
<v Speaker 3>potentially deepen wealth inequality further. The thing is, this is

0:12:47.447 --> 0:12:49.727
<v Speaker 3>quite about the bad news because that don't sound great.

0:12:49.767 --> 0:12:52.407
<v Speaker 3>It's coming, it's coming. There's more bad news because the

0:12:52.447 --> 0:12:54.327
<v Speaker 3>thing is this is quite a few years off for

0:12:54.407 --> 0:12:55.247
<v Speaker 3>most millennials.

0:12:55.367 --> 0:12:57.327
<v Speaker 1>People are living longer and longer, which is great.

0:12:57.647 --> 0:12:59.967
<v Speaker 3>I as a millennial myself, don't even want to think

0:12:59.967 --> 0:13:03.287
<v Speaker 3>about my parents not being here. But the bad news.

0:13:03.407 --> 0:13:06.447
<v Speaker 3>Here's the bad news is that there's never been a

0:13:06.487 --> 0:13:10.207
<v Speaker 3>worse time in Australian history to be thirty year old.

0:13:10.447 --> 0:13:12.247
<v Speaker 4>Well, you don't want to hurry your parents along because

0:13:12.247 --> 0:13:14.447
<v Speaker 4>that's a bit rude, but you would like their money.

0:13:14.567 --> 0:13:16.807
<v Speaker 2>Yes, could I have a question about the thirty year

0:13:16.847 --> 0:13:19.447
<v Speaker 2>olds because I have also heard this and I have

0:13:19.647 --> 0:13:21.807
<v Speaker 2>changed my opinion about it since I fought with Jesse

0:13:21.887 --> 0:13:23.407
<v Speaker 2>about it because I just didn't want to give us

0:13:23.407 --> 0:13:25.847
<v Speaker 2>something to feel sorry for a self about. So I

0:13:25.887 --> 0:13:27.687
<v Speaker 2>recognize that this is a real thing. But when we

0:13:27.727 --> 0:13:30.087
<v Speaker 2>say the worst time ever, do we mean financially?

0:13:30.367 --> 0:13:32.327
<v Speaker 3>I want to play a little grab to start off.

0:13:32.447 --> 0:13:35.007
<v Speaker 3>It's from the ABC show gruin last week.

0:13:35.167 --> 0:13:36.087
<v Speaker 1>Russell Holcroft.

0:13:36.167 --> 0:13:38.527
<v Speaker 3>He's a panelist on the show. He's also a marketing guru.

0:13:38.687 --> 0:13:42.127
<v Speaker 5>He said this, It's a fact that when I was thirty,

0:13:42.727 --> 0:13:45.967
<v Speaker 5>the house cost me three times my salary. Now eight

0:13:46.047 --> 0:13:48.327
<v Speaker 5>times plus for a thirty year old is what it's

0:13:48.327 --> 0:13:50.327
<v Speaker 5>going to cost you to get into the housing market.

0:13:50.727 --> 0:13:55.327
<v Speaker 5>It's true that hex has doubled in the last fifteen years, right,

0:13:55.647 --> 0:13:58.167
<v Speaker 5>doubled from a fifteen thousand dollar bill to a thirty

0:13:58.167 --> 0:14:02.607
<v Speaker 5>thousand dollar bill. It's true that a baby boomer paid

0:14:02.727 --> 0:14:04.967
<v Speaker 5>half the tax that a thirty year old pays now

0:14:05.007 --> 0:14:06.447
<v Speaker 5>when they were thirty years of age.

0:14:06.527 --> 0:14:10.887
<v Speaker 4>So for context, Russell Holcroft is genexa. He would be

0:14:11.047 --> 0:14:13.607
<v Speaker 4>like us. I remember my parents bought their first house

0:14:13.647 --> 0:14:18.007
<v Speaker 4>together for I think forty six thousand dollars. That is

0:14:18.127 --> 0:14:19.367
<v Speaker 4>mind blowing, Sydney.

0:14:19.447 --> 0:14:23.527
<v Speaker 3>I'm thirty three, and honestly, hearing Holcroft say that made

0:14:23.527 --> 0:14:26.247
<v Speaker 3>me feel quite relieved because I thought I was going

0:14:26.287 --> 0:14:29.687
<v Speaker 3>a bit crazy. It feels like right now everyone in

0:14:29.727 --> 0:14:32.727
<v Speaker 3>my generation is talking about the cost of living and

0:14:32.767 --> 0:14:36.007
<v Speaker 3>how hard it is to make those big purchases in

0:14:36.047 --> 0:14:40.967
<v Speaker 3>our life, like houses and weddings and big life moments.

0:14:40.527 --> 0:14:42.607
<v Speaker 1>Because really it's really really.

0:14:42.367 --> 0:14:46.607
<v Speaker 3>Tricky, and it made me feel quite validated hearing him

0:14:46.647 --> 0:14:49.727
<v Speaker 3>spell it all out like that, because it feels like

0:14:49.767 --> 0:14:51.607
<v Speaker 3>we're pushing against a brick wall.

0:14:51.967 --> 0:14:52.807
<v Speaker 1>Away the brick wall.

0:14:52.967 --> 0:14:55.727
<v Speaker 2>We're not the brick wall people. One of the things

0:14:55.727 --> 0:14:58.367
<v Speaker 2>we have to think about when we have these generational fights, right,

0:14:58.527 --> 0:15:00.847
<v Speaker 2>is that the reason people get defensive about it, and

0:15:00.887 --> 0:15:02.767
<v Speaker 2>I get a bit defensive about it as gen Xa,

0:15:02.807 --> 0:15:04.567
<v Speaker 2>Like when Jesse brought this up before, I'm like, oh,

0:15:04.647 --> 0:15:06.247
<v Speaker 2>you make it so like I heard it easy. I

0:15:06.287 --> 0:15:09.207
<v Speaker 2>didn't have it easy. And the thing is is, because

0:15:09.367 --> 0:15:11.287
<v Speaker 2>there isn't anything you can do about the generation you're

0:15:11.327 --> 0:15:13.527
<v Speaker 2>born into, right, it's not the boomer's fault that they

0:15:13.567 --> 0:15:15.847
<v Speaker 2>were the baby boomers. They've just played the hand that

0:15:15.887 --> 0:15:18.487
<v Speaker 2>they got. The thing you can change is the thing

0:15:18.567 --> 0:15:21.807
<v Speaker 2>that made the boomers so successful, which is much better

0:15:21.847 --> 0:15:26.047
<v Speaker 2>social policies around access to things like education and keeping

0:15:26.087 --> 0:15:29.527
<v Speaker 2>it cheap, and like inflation and keeping it down the

0:15:29.607 --> 0:15:32.367
<v Speaker 2>problem with this conversation is it too often becomes a

0:15:32.447 --> 0:15:36.607
<v Speaker 2>generational bond fight, as if we're like the gen Y

0:15:36.727 --> 0:15:38.727
<v Speaker 2>and Z are really mad with the boomers, as if

0:15:38.767 --> 0:15:39.927
<v Speaker 2>they've done something wrong.

0:15:40.167 --> 0:15:43.727
<v Speaker 1>I'm not mad at you. I'm really not. No, no, no,

0:15:43.767 --> 0:15:46.287
<v Speaker 1>I know you're not a millennial. I'm not boomers.

0:15:46.327 --> 0:15:48.567
<v Speaker 4>Just to be clear, people have come on this podcast

0:15:48.607 --> 0:15:51.887
<v Speaker 4>as guest hosts. I've really learned a lesson the hard

0:15:51.887 --> 0:15:54.087
<v Speaker 4>way when they have referred to holly and ized boomers.

0:15:54.127 --> 0:15:57.127
<v Speaker 4>So you have been warned that is your first strike strike.

0:15:57.447 --> 0:15:59.847
<v Speaker 2>I know that you, personally, GENMA are not mad and

0:15:59.887 --> 0:16:01.847
<v Speaker 2>as Mia says, we're not boomers, we're gen XI is

0:16:01.847 --> 0:16:05.367
<v Speaker 2>a very the forgotten generation. But generally it does get

0:16:05.447 --> 0:16:07.607
<v Speaker 2>like that. You look at the dialogue on social media

0:16:07.727 --> 0:16:10.247
<v Speaker 2>and it's kind of like give us your house, Boomer, right,

0:16:10.287 --> 0:16:14.047
<v Speaker 2>that's kind of the vibe, and I understand it. But

0:16:14.247 --> 0:16:16.327
<v Speaker 2>that's not the solution, is it.

0:16:16.367 --> 0:16:18.247
<v Speaker 1>But the solutions aren't.

0:16:17.887 --> 0:16:20.767
<v Speaker 2>They're going to give you their houses in the end.

0:16:20.887 --> 0:16:23.447
<v Speaker 3>They are, but it's Gen X and the boomers that

0:16:23.487 --> 0:16:25.447
<v Speaker 3>are currently in positions of power to be able to

0:16:25.527 --> 0:16:28.087
<v Speaker 3>change said social policies, to be able to make it

0:16:28.127 --> 0:16:31.527
<v Speaker 3>easier for us. So we're not annoyed at everyday boomers

0:16:31.527 --> 0:16:34.287
<v Speaker 3>and Gen X. I'm annoyed that our governments are ignoring

0:16:34.327 --> 0:16:36.927
<v Speaker 3>our pleas for help. That's what I'm annoyed at. I'm

0:16:36.967 --> 0:16:38.967
<v Speaker 3>running my own race. There's a little millennial in my

0:16:39.007 --> 0:16:41.687
<v Speaker 3>little millennial pool. I just want to be able to

0:16:42.007 --> 0:16:44.207
<v Speaker 3>do things. And you know the way, we need more

0:16:44.247 --> 0:16:47.567
<v Speaker 3>millennials in our fers. Like seriously, you always need a

0:16:47.607 --> 0:16:50.407
<v Speaker 3>real cross section of generations. I was hearing over the

0:16:50.407 --> 0:16:54.887
<v Speaker 3>weekend that they're trying to put an age cap in

0:16:55.167 --> 0:16:58.367
<v Speaker 3>Congress in the US because it's full of eighty and

0:16:58.447 --> 0:17:01.407
<v Speaker 3>ninety year olds. I think that the average age of

0:17:01.607 --> 0:17:04.807
<v Speaker 3>a senator or a congressman in Washington is.

0:17:04.807 --> 0:17:08.487
<v Speaker 4>Like eighty What a thirty year old needs and want,

0:17:08.647 --> 0:17:10.527
<v Speaker 4>So they're trying to cap it at like eighty one,

0:17:10.527 --> 0:17:13.647
<v Speaker 4>and they don't things like childcare and things like legislation

0:17:13.727 --> 0:17:17.447
<v Speaker 4>around the internet and social media. You need a real

0:17:17.487 --> 0:17:21.887
<v Speaker 4>cross section in every parliament, of ages, of genders, of

0:17:22.207 --> 0:17:23.447
<v Speaker 4>socioeconomic groups.

0:17:23.447 --> 0:17:24.047
<v Speaker 1>It's crucial.

0:17:24.407 --> 0:17:27.047
<v Speaker 2>In Australia, it's not too bad, but I hear you

0:17:27.047 --> 0:17:29.127
<v Speaker 2>you one hundred percent do me or you're right. But

0:17:29.167 --> 0:17:31.127
<v Speaker 2>also one of the reasons why this is difficult to

0:17:31.127 --> 0:17:34.327
<v Speaker 2>grapple with is it hasn't happened for generations, right. The

0:17:34.367 --> 0:17:36.887
<v Speaker 2>reason why this is such a tragedy really, and what

0:17:37.007 --> 0:17:38.887
<v Speaker 2>Horcroft is trying to explain there, and he does it

0:17:39.007 --> 0:17:41.087
<v Speaker 2>very well, is that for millennials and gen Z is

0:17:41.127 --> 0:17:43.807
<v Speaker 2>this is the first time in three generations that the

0:17:43.887 --> 0:17:46.047
<v Speaker 2>children are going to be worse off than their parents,

0:17:46.087 --> 0:17:49.327
<v Speaker 2>which is where this inheritance thing comes in, Right, Baby

0:17:49.327 --> 0:17:52.447
<v Speaker 2>Boom is inherited next to nothing from their parents because

0:17:52.487 --> 0:17:55.127
<v Speaker 2>the Great Depression, all of those things. Gen X, we're

0:17:55.127 --> 0:17:57.487
<v Speaker 2>not going to get much, right, Millennials are going to

0:17:57.487 --> 0:17:59.887
<v Speaker 2>get a lot of money one day. They're calling it

0:17:59.967 --> 0:18:02.727
<v Speaker 2>the Great Wealth Transfer. This isn't only in Australia, it's

0:18:02.727 --> 0:18:04.967
<v Speaker 2>in America. It's in all kinds of countries, and it's

0:18:05.007 --> 0:18:08.847
<v Speaker 2>going to be so seismic. You're right, gem that on

0:18:08.887 --> 0:18:11.207
<v Speaker 2>an in visual level, this is only going to benefit

0:18:11.287 --> 0:18:13.647
<v Speaker 2>you if your parents are doing well. But the reason

0:18:13.687 --> 0:18:16.727
<v Speaker 2>why it's a bigger picture thing is it literally is

0:18:16.767 --> 0:18:19.967
<v Speaker 2>the first time that your standard of living is going

0:18:20.007 --> 0:18:22.047
<v Speaker 2>to be lower than your parents by the time you

0:18:22.127 --> 0:18:25.007
<v Speaker 2>reach a significant point in your career, and so they're

0:18:25.007 --> 0:18:28.327
<v Speaker 2>figuring out how to handle that. And the argument about

0:18:28.327 --> 0:18:30.527
<v Speaker 2>whether or not you should be hurrying your parents along

0:18:31.207 --> 0:18:34.567
<v Speaker 2>is kind of humorous, except it's not. Because one of

0:18:34.647 --> 0:18:38.167
<v Speaker 2>the big conversations is about whether or not boomers and

0:18:38.407 --> 0:18:42.567
<v Speaker 2>older gen xers should be disincentivized to keep hold of

0:18:42.607 --> 0:18:44.967
<v Speaker 2>their family homes, for example, to force them back onto

0:18:45.007 --> 0:18:47.807
<v Speaker 2>the market for young people. But then the young people

0:18:47.807 --> 0:18:49.727
<v Speaker 2>aren't going to be able to afford to buy them anyway.

0:18:50.087 --> 0:18:52.367
<v Speaker 2>And they just did this survey in Australia about whether

0:18:52.487 --> 0:18:56.447
<v Speaker 2>or not boomers were willing to drop their lifestyle expectations

0:18:56.887 --> 0:18:59.007
<v Speaker 2>to help their kids out. And while lots of people

0:18:59.047 --> 0:19:01.887
<v Speaker 2>are doing that, another lot of boomers are also like, well, no,

0:19:02.047 --> 0:19:04.167
<v Speaker 2>because I worked really hard for this and why should

0:19:04.207 --> 0:19:06.807
<v Speaker 2>I be on two minute noodles in my retirement. And

0:19:06.847 --> 0:19:09.207
<v Speaker 2>that's where all the emotions and the argument stuff.

0:19:09.447 --> 0:19:11.287
<v Speaker 3>But this is why the bank of Mum and Dad

0:19:11.767 --> 0:19:14.287
<v Speaker 3>people scoff at that and at those headlines but it's

0:19:14.327 --> 0:19:18.687
<v Speaker 3>actually such an important part of our current society. I

0:19:18.727 --> 0:19:20.607
<v Speaker 3>know that I probably wouldn't have had a wedding if

0:19:20.687 --> 0:19:22.567
<v Speaker 3>I hadn't have had help from my parents. I also

0:19:22.567 --> 0:19:26.167
<v Speaker 3>wouldn't be in the relatively comfortable apartment i'm in if

0:19:26.167 --> 0:19:29.327
<v Speaker 3>my parents and in laws hadn't helped me, because even

0:19:29.367 --> 0:19:31.967
<v Speaker 3>though my husband and I are on relatively good incomes,

0:19:32.967 --> 0:19:36.647
<v Speaker 3>we couldn't afford what is currently out there in the world.

0:19:36.727 --> 0:19:37.367
<v Speaker 1>We do live.

0:19:37.207 --> 0:19:41.327
<v Speaker 3>One of the most expensive cities in Australia in the world.

0:19:42.007 --> 0:19:44.767
<v Speaker 3>It shouldn't be this tough, and that is why my

0:19:44.927 --> 0:19:48.087
<v Speaker 3>generation is looking to their parents to help them now,

0:19:48.487 --> 0:19:51.007
<v Speaker 3>not once they die, because now is when we need it.

0:19:51.047 --> 0:19:53.407
<v Speaker 3>I'm currently trying to build a family.

0:19:53.327 --> 0:19:55.767
<v Speaker 4>That if giving with a warm hand rather than a

0:19:55.807 --> 0:20:00.207
<v Speaker 4>cold exactly. I learned recently that something like more than

0:20:00.247 --> 0:20:04.807
<v Speaker 4>fifty percent of kids at private schools have their fees

0:20:04.847 --> 0:20:07.447
<v Speaker 4>paid by their grandparents, not their parents.

0:20:07.487 --> 0:20:07.887
<v Speaker 1>Wow.

0:20:08.287 --> 0:20:14.287
<v Speaker 4>So it's interesting seeing that privilege entrenched as well across generations.

0:20:14.727 --> 0:20:16.767
<v Speaker 2>I think it's a lot to ask a generation to

0:20:17.447 --> 0:20:20.567
<v Speaker 2>hand over their money. As I say, every generation thinks

0:20:20.567 --> 0:20:23.007
<v Speaker 2>they did it tough to a point. The boomers will say,

0:20:23.007 --> 0:20:24.927
<v Speaker 2>we worked really hard. But actually what helped them is

0:20:24.967 --> 0:20:27.287
<v Speaker 2>a lack of debt. And I didn't own a home

0:20:27.327 --> 0:20:29.087
<v Speaker 2>until I was in my late thirties. It's not like

0:20:29.127 --> 0:20:32.727
<v Speaker 2>we were all walking around snapping up properties at twenty two.

0:20:32.847 --> 0:20:35.327
<v Speaker 2>You know, I think there's like, you've got to have

0:20:35.367 --> 0:20:38.847
<v Speaker 2>a bigger picture on what is affecting this, And I

0:20:38.887 --> 0:20:40.767
<v Speaker 2>think you're right, gem is this it's more about putting

0:20:40.767 --> 0:20:42.767
<v Speaker 2>the pressure on the people in power rather than kicking

0:20:42.767 --> 0:20:44.007
<v Speaker 2>the boomers out of their houses.

0:20:44.207 --> 0:20:47.207
<v Speaker 3>But it's not handing over wealth to another generation. It

0:20:47.287 --> 0:20:50.407
<v Speaker 3>is giving your children and your grandchildren an opportunity to

0:20:50.407 --> 0:20:54.327
<v Speaker 3>live a comfortable life now money within the family. That's

0:20:54.367 --> 0:20:54.847
<v Speaker 3>what it is.

0:20:55.007 --> 0:20:57.607
<v Speaker 4>I hope your parents are listening. I had a funny

0:20:57.647 --> 0:21:00.527
<v Speaker 4>conversation with my mum yesterday. I haven't seen her for

0:21:00.607 --> 0:21:03.167
<v Speaker 4>sureis because my parents have had COVID, so they've been

0:21:03.247 --> 0:21:05.647
<v Speaker 4>kind of isolating themselves, and.

0:21:05.567 --> 0:21:06.487
<v Speaker 1>Before that they're away.

0:21:06.607 --> 0:21:09.447
<v Speaker 4>So we were talking about it and they were on

0:21:09.487 --> 0:21:12.647
<v Speaker 4>these antivirals, and you know, if anyone's been on antivirals

0:21:12.647 --> 0:21:15.687
<v Speaker 4>for COVID, which they recommend, if you're in a high

0:21:15.727 --> 0:21:18.847
<v Speaker 4>risk group or over a certain age, you can often

0:21:19.047 --> 0:21:21.087
<v Speaker 4>think you're recovering, and then it comes back and you

0:21:21.127 --> 0:21:23.967
<v Speaker 4>test positive again. Anyway, so it's been a long process.

0:21:24.207 --> 0:21:26.487
<v Speaker 4>And I said, yesterday I was asking about my dad

0:21:26.527 --> 0:21:30.647
<v Speaker 4>and she said, yeah, well you know, the end is near.

0:21:30.887 --> 0:21:34.407
<v Speaker 1>And I was like, you're not that old. Things have

0:21:34.487 --> 0:21:35.647
<v Speaker 1>got a bit dark.

0:21:35.647 --> 0:21:38.967
<v Speaker 3>My grandma, And she goes, she laughed, and she goes, Oh, no, darling,

0:21:39.047 --> 0:21:40.287
<v Speaker 3>I just meant the end of.

0:21:40.167 --> 0:21:43.767
<v Speaker 1>Like our COVID isolation. Oh, I went to the same

0:21:43.807 --> 0:21:44.327
<v Speaker 1>place as you.

0:21:44.887 --> 0:21:45.087
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:21:45.567 --> 0:21:48.087
<v Speaker 2>I just have to say something for the gen xs though, right,

0:21:48.247 --> 0:21:50.367
<v Speaker 2>because one of the things that I struggle with about

0:21:50.367 --> 0:21:52.567
<v Speaker 2>the bank of Mom and dad idea is like, I

0:21:52.607 --> 0:21:54.407
<v Speaker 2>live in the same economy that you live in, right,

0:21:54.487 --> 0:21:57.567
<v Speaker 2>jem If the expectation now is that not only do

0:21:57.647 --> 0:22:00.207
<v Speaker 2>I have to work from now until whenever I may

0:22:00.407 --> 0:22:03.167
<v Speaker 2>or may not retire to pay off my mortgage and

0:22:03.287 --> 0:22:05.407
<v Speaker 2>live in this economy and feed everybody and drive a

0:22:05.407 --> 0:22:07.087
<v Speaker 2>car and all those things, but I also have to

0:22:07.127 --> 0:22:10.807
<v Speaker 2>somehow magically save enough money to give my kids a

0:22:10.927 --> 0:22:13.527
<v Speaker 2>deposit for a house in the most expensive corner of

0:22:13.567 --> 0:22:16.047
<v Speaker 2>the most expensive city in the world. It's like, no, babes,

0:22:16.087 --> 0:22:18.327
<v Speaker 2>You'll be making your own way and you'll be dealing

0:22:18.367 --> 0:22:19.287
<v Speaker 2>with what you're dealing with.

0:22:19.367 --> 0:22:19.727
<v Speaker 1>I don't know.

0:22:19.807 --> 0:22:23.047
<v Speaker 2>I find that it feels like extra pressure.

0:22:23.567 --> 0:22:26.887
<v Speaker 3>It is and it shouldn't be happening. It shouldn't be happening.

0:22:27.207 --> 0:22:30.087
<v Speaker 3>But I feel like my generation is screaming at that wall.

0:22:30.167 --> 0:22:32.367
<v Speaker 3>Let's bring the wall back. The wall is the politicians,

0:22:32.367 --> 0:22:35.807
<v Speaker 3>the people in charge, and until they change it, this

0:22:35.887 --> 0:22:36.927
<v Speaker 3>is what we've been doing to do.

0:22:37.007 --> 0:22:37.807
<v Speaker 1>What do you want them to do?

0:22:38.167 --> 0:22:40.847
<v Speaker 3>Change the policies, like with the housing market, make it

0:22:40.887 --> 0:22:43.287
<v Speaker 3>easier for us to break in. We used to have

0:22:43.367 --> 0:22:45.927
<v Speaker 3>first home buyers grants. That's no longer really a thing.

0:22:46.247 --> 0:22:47.647
<v Speaker 3>I didn't get a baby bonus.

0:22:47.887 --> 0:22:49.487
<v Speaker 4>I got a baby bonus, and then they worked out

0:22:49.487 --> 0:22:52.927
<v Speaker 4>everyone was using it to buy plasma TVs, so they

0:22:52.927 --> 0:22:53.447
<v Speaker 4>took it away.

0:22:53.447 --> 0:22:55.287
<v Speaker 1>How much was it? I think my first one was

0:22:55.327 --> 0:22:57.527
<v Speaker 1>three second. Do you know what I could do with

0:22:57.647 --> 0:22:58.887
<v Speaker 1>three thousand dollars?

0:22:58.887 --> 0:23:02.487
<v Speaker 4>People like some people were buying like fancy prans because everybody.

0:23:02.207 --> 0:23:04.047
<v Speaker 3>Got it right to share people let them buy the

0:23:04.087 --> 0:23:06.447
<v Speaker 3>fancy prean. No I got buying orf fucking dumb tree.

0:23:06.847 --> 0:23:09.847
<v Speaker 2>Although you know, again I didn't spend my baby bonus

0:23:09.847 --> 0:23:11.687
<v Speaker 2>on a plasma TV. It went to trying to have

0:23:11.727 --> 0:23:14.127
<v Speaker 2>some time off work. It's not true that it all

0:23:14.127 --> 0:23:15.007
<v Speaker 2>got fritted away.

0:23:15.087 --> 0:23:16.087
<v Speaker 1>It was like part of it.

0:23:16.127 --> 0:23:18.527
<v Speaker 2>At that time they didn't have paid maternity leave, so

0:23:18.567 --> 0:23:21.647
<v Speaker 2>the baby bonus stood. So again it's this resentment of like,

0:23:21.687 --> 0:23:23.567
<v Speaker 2>you guys had it easy. Everyone was giving you money

0:23:23.567 --> 0:23:25.527
<v Speaker 2>to buy TVs. It's like, no, it isn't like that.

0:23:25.647 --> 0:23:26.647
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't like that.

0:23:26.807 --> 0:23:29.487
<v Speaker 2>You know. It's also true that in places like Germany,

0:23:29.527 --> 0:23:32.127
<v Speaker 2>where there's much less of an expectation that everyone will

0:23:32.127 --> 0:23:34.767
<v Speaker 2>own their own home, like renting is more part of

0:23:34.767 --> 0:23:38.087
<v Speaker 2>the culture, they make renting more secure because that's another thing, right,

0:23:38.167 --> 0:23:39.967
<v Speaker 2>is that if you're facing that, you're definitely going to

0:23:40.007 --> 0:23:41.967
<v Speaker 2>be renting till you're in your forties. One of the

0:23:41.967 --> 0:23:44.127
<v Speaker 2>reasons why that's a problem, apart from wealth building up,

0:23:44.167 --> 0:23:46.687
<v Speaker 2>is the insecurity of it. So you can change policies

0:23:46.727 --> 0:23:49.567
<v Speaker 2>around that. You can change policies around HEXTEP, which this

0:23:49.647 --> 0:23:51.807
<v Speaker 2>government is doing a little bit but not enough. You

0:23:51.847 --> 0:23:54.047
<v Speaker 2>can relieve some of the burden of pressure on this

0:23:54.127 --> 0:23:57.047
<v Speaker 2>generation to be under a pile of debt from the

0:23:57.047 --> 0:23:58.407
<v Speaker 2>minute they step out of UNI.

0:23:58.607 --> 0:24:01.207
<v Speaker 3>Trust me, I don't want to take money from my parents.

0:24:01.447 --> 0:24:03.047
<v Speaker 3>I don't want to I want to do it all

0:24:03.087 --> 0:24:07.447
<v Speaker 3>by myself. But it's like, until they change stuff, I

0:24:07.487 --> 0:24:10.647
<v Speaker 3>am having to take some handouts here and there to.

0:24:10.567 --> 0:24:13.087
<v Speaker 1>Be able to pursue what I want in life.

0:24:15.327 --> 0:24:17.127
<v Speaker 4>Do you want daily outloud access?

0:24:17.167 --> 0:24:17.887
<v Speaker 1>Why wouldn't you?

0:24:18.007 --> 0:24:22.207
<v Speaker 4>We dropped episodes every Tuesday and Thursday exclusively for Mum

0:24:22.207 --> 0:24:24.487
<v Speaker 4>and Me A subscribers. Follow the link in the show

0:24:24.527 --> 0:24:26.847
<v Speaker 4>notes to get us in your ears five days a week,

0:24:27.247 --> 0:24:29.847
<v Speaker 4>and a huge thank you if you're already a subscriber.

0:24:38.727 --> 0:24:40.887
<v Speaker 4>There's a sex scene everyone's talking about this week, which

0:24:41.007 --> 0:24:43.807
<v Speaker 4>is kind of interesting in itself because sex scenes are

0:24:43.887 --> 0:24:47.767
<v Speaker 4>rarely controversial anymore. The last controversial sex scene I can

0:24:47.807 --> 0:24:50.847
<v Speaker 4>think of was that time a few years ago when

0:24:50.847 --> 0:24:53.327
<v Speaker 4>Miranda got finger banged in the kitchen by her new

0:24:53.367 --> 0:24:57.247
<v Speaker 4>non binary partner Chay while Carrie recovered from surgery in

0:24:57.247 --> 0:24:58.607
<v Speaker 4>the next room and had to wean a bottle.

0:24:58.727 --> 0:24:59.727
<v Speaker 1>Remember that was a vibe.

0:24:59.767 --> 0:25:01.167
<v Speaker 2>That was a good time.

0:25:01.567 --> 0:25:02.847
<v Speaker 1>They were good times.

0:25:03.327 --> 0:25:06.807
<v Speaker 4>The sex scene in question is from the third season

0:25:07.047 --> 0:25:09.487
<v Speaker 4>of Bridgeton, and there's a lot of sex in the

0:25:09.487 --> 0:25:11.807
<v Speaker 4>TV show bridget And we've seen all kinds of sex,

0:25:11.847 --> 0:25:16.567
<v Speaker 4>including in this season. Why is this particular scene causing

0:25:16.807 --> 0:25:19.647
<v Speaker 4>such a buzz. And it's not just because it was

0:25:19.767 --> 0:25:22.287
<v Speaker 4>a six minute sex scene. If you thought it went

0:25:22.327 --> 0:25:25.247
<v Speaker 4>on for a long time, it did. It's kind of

0:25:25.407 --> 0:25:28.367
<v Speaker 4>was the whole sex in real time, which I really appreciated,

0:25:29.007 --> 0:25:32.527
<v Speaker 4>because sometimes sex can either be really fast on camera

0:25:33.007 --> 0:25:35.487
<v Speaker 4>or it can seem like it goes sort of for

0:25:35.567 --> 0:25:38.487
<v Speaker 4>hours in time lapse. Is it a same sex scene? No?

0:25:38.927 --> 0:25:42.447
<v Speaker 1>Is it a threesome? No moral anal? No?

0:25:42.447 --> 0:25:47.687
<v Speaker 4>No, it's actually a very vanilla, sweet, loving, losing my

0:25:47.807 --> 0:25:51.007
<v Speaker 4>virginity scene between a man and a woman who are

0:25:51.047 --> 0:25:55.167
<v Speaker 4>engaged to be married. Penelope and Colin or Pollen as

0:25:55.167 --> 0:25:56.647
<v Speaker 4>their portmanteau.

0:25:56.247 --> 0:25:57.687
<v Speaker 1>Has become cute.

0:25:58.327 --> 0:26:00.287
<v Speaker 4>The reason this scene is and I don't want to

0:26:00.367 --> 0:26:03.487
<v Speaker 4>use the word controversial, but maybe surprising is a better word,

0:26:03.527 --> 0:26:07.247
<v Speaker 4>because I certainly felt surprised when I saw it, is

0:26:07.287 --> 0:26:11.247
<v Speaker 4>because the actress in this scene, Nicola Coughlin, whose body

0:26:11.327 --> 0:26:14.247
<v Speaker 4>is not the same size or shape as every other

0:26:14.287 --> 0:26:18.127
<v Speaker 4>female body that we're used to seeing in sex scenes

0:26:18.207 --> 0:26:21.807
<v Speaker 4>on TV shows and in movies. Nicola, who stars as

0:26:21.847 --> 0:26:26.567
<v Speaker 4>Penelope Featherington, has been asked by a lot of media

0:26:27.407 --> 0:26:31.967
<v Speaker 4>who have referred to her bravery for being semi naked

0:26:32.167 --> 0:26:36.927
<v Speaker 4>in that scene because her body is curvier than the

0:26:37.007 --> 0:26:39.127
<v Speaker 4>type of body that you usually see in a Hollywood

0:26:39.127 --> 0:26:43.207
<v Speaker 4>sex scene. Here's how Nicola responded when she was asked

0:26:43.247 --> 0:26:46.607
<v Speaker 4>about her bravery when filming that scene.

0:26:50.567 --> 0:26:53.207
<v Speaker 2>You know it is because I think women with body tied,

0:26:53.367 --> 0:26:54.807
<v Speaker 2>women with perfect rests.

0:26:59.447 --> 0:27:01.047
<v Speaker 1>I love that. That's so good.

0:27:01.127 --> 0:27:03.807
<v Speaker 4>It was such a great clapback. But I think that

0:27:03.847 --> 0:27:08.207
<v Speaker 4>the question is kind of valid because there is a

0:27:08.247 --> 0:27:11.087
<v Speaker 4>surprise in c that scene. The other thing that was

0:27:11.087 --> 0:27:13.887
<v Speaker 4>interesting about it is how consent was handled. There were

0:27:13.887 --> 0:27:16.767
<v Speaker 4>two sex scenes. Actually, there's another finger banging scene in

0:27:16.807 --> 0:27:21.647
<v Speaker 4>a carriage with Colin and Penelope, and that consent is

0:27:21.727 --> 0:27:24.807
<v Speaker 4>done so well and then made to look really sexy.

0:27:24.847 --> 0:27:27.007
<v Speaker 4>I haven't seen that before where he just looks at

0:27:27.047 --> 0:27:30.567
<v Speaker 4>her and raises his eyebrows to say can I do this?

0:27:30.647 --> 0:27:33.527
<v Speaker 4>And she nods and same when they have the actual

0:27:33.687 --> 0:27:36.447
<v Speaker 4>losing her virginity scene, he checks in with.

0:27:36.407 --> 0:27:41.047
<v Speaker 1>Her, must stop. We do not watch for that? Do

0:27:41.087 --> 0:27:44.167
<v Speaker 1>you thot watch for you to stop? I really loved it.

0:27:44.207 --> 0:27:45.167
<v Speaker 1>I thought it was amazing.

0:27:45.607 --> 0:27:45.887
<v Speaker 2>Hole.

0:27:46.127 --> 0:27:48.847
<v Speaker 4>You were a bit on the fence about this season

0:27:48.847 --> 0:27:51.567
<v Speaker 4>of Bridgeton. Did you find that scene as horny is

0:27:51.727 --> 0:27:52.407
<v Speaker 4>everyone else?

0:27:52.647 --> 0:27:56.647
<v Speaker 2>I loved it. I've had to issue a formal apology

0:27:56.687 --> 0:27:59.447
<v Speaker 2>to me because when the first half of this season

0:27:59.487 --> 0:28:03.127
<v Speaker 2>dropped because they're dropping Bridgeton in two sections on a

0:28:03.127 --> 0:28:05.047
<v Speaker 2>Friday night, I watched the first two or three and

0:28:05.087 --> 0:28:07.047
<v Speaker 2>I was like, Man, I'm over this the whole, Like,

0:28:07.087 --> 0:28:09.247
<v Speaker 2>who's the diamond of the season, Who's going to marry her?

0:28:09.447 --> 0:28:09.767
<v Speaker 1>Whatever?

0:28:09.887 --> 0:28:12.727
<v Speaker 2>I'm done. It seems so silly. And then I just

0:28:13.207 --> 0:28:16.647
<v Speaker 2>inhaled this second half over the weekend and loved every

0:28:16.647 --> 0:28:19.047
<v Speaker 2>bit of it, which leads me to believe I must

0:28:19.047 --> 0:28:21.047
<v Speaker 2>have been in a very bad mood when I started

0:28:21.047 --> 0:28:23.047
<v Speaker 2>watching it, or maybe I was just waiting for the

0:28:23.087 --> 0:28:25.327
<v Speaker 2>sex scenes. And they have not disappointed.

0:28:25.967 --> 0:28:26.727
<v Speaker 1>I love this.

0:28:26.927 --> 0:28:28.927
<v Speaker 2>And the thing is is that we had a conversation

0:28:29.047 --> 0:28:31.087
<v Speaker 2>the other week that went on and on and many

0:28:31.087 --> 0:28:34.447
<v Speaker 2>out louders joined in about beauty standards and about whether

0:28:34.567 --> 0:28:37.527
<v Speaker 2>or not we should call everybody beautiful, like the idea

0:28:37.567 --> 0:28:40.287
<v Speaker 2>everybody's beautiful is a good idea or not? The thing

0:28:40.367 --> 0:28:42.567
<v Speaker 2>I love about Bridgeton and they've done it in this

0:28:42.647 --> 0:28:45.207
<v Speaker 2>season with different body types, but they did it last

0:28:45.247 --> 0:28:49.847
<v Speaker 2>season with different ethnicities. Because the sexy female lead last

0:28:49.927 --> 0:28:52.887
<v Speaker 2>year was South Asian descent. Kate Schwama, she's called in

0:28:52.927 --> 0:28:55.767
<v Speaker 2>the show Simon Ashley in real life, and that was

0:28:55.807 --> 0:28:58.287
<v Speaker 2>a mixed race couple. Like the first season was where

0:28:58.327 --> 0:29:01.327
<v Speaker 2>this woman was just so beautiful, and I know that

0:29:01.407 --> 0:29:03.407
<v Speaker 2>m Vernon wrote a piece about how happy she was

0:29:03.447 --> 0:29:06.607
<v Speaker 2>to see that reflected in this one. They've taken a

0:29:06.647 --> 0:29:09.807
<v Speaker 2>woman who in the first couple of seasons was generally

0:29:09.847 --> 0:29:11.807
<v Speaker 2>perceived to be a bit of a wallflower and the

0:29:11.847 --> 0:29:13.847
<v Speaker 2>butt of the joke and her being a wallflower is

0:29:13.847 --> 0:29:18.847
<v Speaker 2>a big thing, and they have shot her. She is beautiful.

0:29:18.967 --> 0:29:23.007
<v Speaker 2>She is so beautiful, her skin, her perfect breasts as

0:29:23.007 --> 0:29:27.447
<v Speaker 2>she describes them, and they really are. I absolutely loved it.

0:29:27.567 --> 0:29:29.807
<v Speaker 2>The thing I think is good about this is, even

0:29:29.847 --> 0:29:32.247
<v Speaker 2>though it's silly and maybe a bit embarrassing that everybody's

0:29:32.647 --> 0:29:35.887
<v Speaker 2>questioning Nicola Cochlan about how she feels about her body,

0:29:36.207 --> 0:29:39.447
<v Speaker 2>we're watching beauty standards expanding in real time because women

0:29:40.207 --> 0:29:44.527
<v Speaker 2>love this. Why do women love it seeing this conventionally hot,

0:29:44.687 --> 0:29:47.807
<v Speaker 2>sexy dude mad with lust for this woman who is

0:29:47.887 --> 0:29:53.407
<v Speaker 2>not tall, skinny, straight sized. It's because it makes us

0:29:53.447 --> 0:29:56.607
<v Speaker 2>feel seen. And she is beautiful.

0:29:56.807 --> 0:29:57.687
<v Speaker 1>She's also hot.

0:29:57.807 --> 0:30:01.447
<v Speaker 3>She's so hot, but she's also as amazing off screen

0:30:01.567 --> 0:30:03.207
<v Speaker 3>as she is on screen, which.

0:30:02.967 --> 0:30:04.087
<v Speaker 1>Is what I love about her.

0:30:04.207 --> 0:30:06.207
<v Speaker 3>So the script actually called for her to be more

0:30:06.207 --> 0:30:08.287
<v Speaker 3>covered up than she is in the show. She's the

0:30:08.287 --> 0:30:09.807
<v Speaker 3>one that actually was like, no, I want to be

0:30:09.847 --> 0:30:10.367
<v Speaker 3>more naked.

0:30:10.447 --> 0:30:11.887
<v Speaker 1>Paint me like your French girls.

0:30:11.967 --> 0:30:14.207
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it's like, let me be as naked as the

0:30:14.247 --> 0:30:16.487
<v Speaker 4>other straight sized women who get sex scenes.

0:30:16.607 --> 0:30:17.927
<v Speaker 3>She kind of said she wanted to do it as

0:30:17.927 --> 0:30:20.527
<v Speaker 3>a bit of a fuck you, which I just think

0:30:20.607 --> 0:30:23.887
<v Speaker 3>is amazing. And that's not the first time she's been asked.

0:30:23.687 --> 0:30:25.727
<v Speaker 1>That grab that we heard about her.

0:30:25.607 --> 0:30:28.567
<v Speaker 3>Body, and it's always journalists that bring up those, you know,

0:30:29.087 --> 0:30:32.007
<v Speaker 3>words like bravery, But when you actually watch Bridgeton, there's

0:30:32.127 --> 0:30:34.967
<v Speaker 3>no mention of weight. There's no mention of the fact

0:30:35.007 --> 0:30:38.727
<v Speaker 3>that that is an issue for Colin or for her.

0:30:38.927 --> 0:30:41.127
<v Speaker 3>It's just a non issue. It's just a thing.

0:30:41.447 --> 0:30:42.967
<v Speaker 1>It's just what I think is so amazing.

0:30:43.047 --> 0:30:46.767
<v Speaker 4>Shonda Rhimes, who is responsible for this show and Gray's

0:30:46.767 --> 0:30:49.967
<v Speaker 4>Anatomy and so many other shows, I think she's done

0:30:50.007 --> 0:30:54.007
<v Speaker 4>more for expanding beauty standards in our culture, in our

0:30:54.007 --> 0:30:57.087
<v Speaker 4>pop culture, and our broader culture than anybody I can

0:30:57.127 --> 0:31:00.967
<v Speaker 4>think of, because she has consistently done this from the

0:31:00.967 --> 0:31:04.047
<v Speaker 4>beginning of her career when she didn't have much power casting.

0:31:04.087 --> 0:31:06.727
<v Speaker 4>Sandra was one of the leads on Grades Anatomy and

0:31:06.967 --> 0:31:10.527
<v Speaker 4>having mixed race couples and people different body shapes and

0:31:10.607 --> 0:31:14.767
<v Speaker 4>ages and sizes in all of her shows. She's extraordinary

0:31:14.847 --> 0:31:17.167
<v Speaker 4>and I think this is yet another example of that.

0:31:17.247 --> 0:31:21.447
<v Speaker 4>And I love the fact that appearance is never mentioned

0:31:21.487 --> 0:31:22.087
<v Speaker 4>in this show.

0:31:22.847 --> 0:31:23.607
<v Speaker 1>It just isn't.

0:31:24.007 --> 0:31:27.807
<v Speaker 3>I could see another director, though, taking that story and

0:31:28.207 --> 0:31:31.927
<v Speaker 3>doing what the books did, which was make nicholas character

0:31:31.967 --> 0:31:33.567
<v Speaker 3>Penelope lose weight.

0:31:33.887 --> 0:31:35.127
<v Speaker 1>In the books, she loses weight.

0:31:35.207 --> 0:31:37.807
<v Speaker 2>She she has a different kind of makeover.

0:31:37.927 --> 0:31:41.487
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, whereas she made an actual decision, Well that's

0:31:41.527 --> 0:31:41.927
<v Speaker 3>not happening.

0:31:42.047 --> 0:31:43.447
<v Speaker 1>Yes, Shonda wouldn't have been into that.

0:31:43.647 --> 0:31:45.927
<v Speaker 2>Well, the only thing is is that they might not

0:31:46.007 --> 0:31:48.967
<v Speaker 2>mention weight directly. But the whole point of this storyline

0:31:49.007 --> 0:31:51.487
<v Speaker 2>is that she's an unexpected choice for the Heartthrop right

0:31:51.687 --> 0:31:55.527
<v Speaker 2>like her walla Flower status is mentioned constantly. The other

0:31:55.647 --> 0:31:58.127
<v Speaker 2>fancy people on the circuit are all like, oh, as

0:31:58.127 --> 0:32:01.287
<v Speaker 2>if you know so, it is reference. The only thing

0:32:01.367 --> 0:32:03.007
<v Speaker 2>is I'm just going to argue against myself for a

0:32:03.047 --> 0:32:05.567
<v Speaker 2>minute because I was celebrating this so much. But then

0:32:05.607 --> 0:32:08.047
<v Speaker 2>Mia when you said, paint me like your French girls.

0:32:08.167 --> 0:32:11.807
<v Speaker 2>Obviously I got excited. Who doesn't love that? But it

0:32:11.887 --> 0:32:15.007
<v Speaker 2>made me remember that, actually, do these kind of big

0:32:15.047 --> 0:32:18.647
<v Speaker 2>pop culture moments really expand beauty standards Because all the

0:32:18.687 --> 0:32:21.127
<v Speaker 2>way back then in the nineties, when Kate Winslet was

0:32:21.207 --> 0:32:25.087
<v Speaker 2>Rose in Titanic, the headlines were all about her body.

0:32:25.247 --> 0:32:29.287
<v Speaker 2>Kate Wincelet got very much pigeonholed as a larger woman,

0:32:29.767 --> 0:32:32.327
<v Speaker 2>someone who is exceptional to the beauty standards of the day,

0:32:32.407 --> 0:32:36.087
<v Speaker 2>and she was constantly asked about that being curvy, being larger,

0:32:36.327 --> 0:32:40.327
<v Speaker 2>which now seems almost ridiculous, but that was the obsession.

0:32:40.847 --> 0:32:42.967
<v Speaker 2>Then we kind of went back to skinny ladies for

0:32:42.967 --> 0:32:44.767
<v Speaker 2>a long time, and I know that sounds disparaging, but

0:32:44.807 --> 0:32:47.047
<v Speaker 2>you know what I mean, that the beautiful heartthrom had

0:32:47.087 --> 0:32:49.647
<v Speaker 2>to look a certain way. Then remember when Girls came

0:32:49.687 --> 0:32:53.047
<v Speaker 2>out and Lena Dunham was in sex scenes with this

0:32:53.327 --> 0:32:56.527
<v Speaker 2>body that we weren't used to seeing naked, and headlines

0:32:56.567 --> 0:33:00.167
<v Speaker 2>and headlines about her bravery. How remarkable it was that

0:33:00.207 --> 0:33:02.967
<v Speaker 2>she would consent to be semi naked on screen when

0:33:02.967 --> 0:33:05.127
<v Speaker 2>she didn't look like a supermodel. And then we go

0:33:05.247 --> 0:33:06.887
<v Speaker 2>back to the beauty standards for a while, and then

0:33:06.967 --> 0:33:09.927
<v Speaker 2>Nicola breaks through. I wonder like, do we expand and

0:33:10.087 --> 0:33:12.767
<v Speaker 2>stay or do we just expand and contract.

0:33:13.247 --> 0:33:17.727
<v Speaker 4>I think that it takes a long time of tapping

0:33:17.727 --> 0:33:21.047
<v Speaker 4>on that glass ceiling of beauty standards until you break through.

0:33:21.727 --> 0:33:25.087
<v Speaker 4>And I think that you have to have a creator.

0:33:25.487 --> 0:33:27.407
<v Speaker 4>I can't speak for Titanic, but you look at Lena

0:33:27.447 --> 0:33:29.567
<v Speaker 4>Dunnan was the creator of Girls. Shonda Rhimes is the

0:33:29.607 --> 0:33:34.327
<v Speaker 4>creator of Bridgeton. Who spend the capital that they've earned

0:33:34.327 --> 0:33:38.047
<v Speaker 4>from their success and push that through because it's not easy.

0:33:38.167 --> 0:33:41.887
<v Speaker 4>Studios don't like it, marketing team don't like it. It's

0:33:41.927 --> 0:33:44.807
<v Speaker 4>not a selling point as such. You've got to have

0:33:45.007 --> 0:33:46.407
<v Speaker 4>someone who really fights for it.

0:33:46.527 --> 0:33:49.487
<v Speaker 2>Why don't studios and marketing teams like it anymore? When

0:33:49.527 --> 0:33:51.487
<v Speaker 2>what this shows again and again by the way that

0:33:51.527 --> 0:33:54.767
<v Speaker 2>these that when we see it, women are so unbelievably

0:33:55.087 --> 0:33:58.327
<v Speaker 2>embracing and love it that it's good for business.

0:33:58.087 --> 0:34:00.127
<v Speaker 3>Because there's plenty of people out there that are still

0:34:00.167 --> 0:34:03.487
<v Speaker 3>of the opinion that it's not good, even Nikola.

0:34:03.207 --> 0:34:06.047
<v Speaker 4>Because men make decisions whole Like the argument when I

0:34:06.167 --> 0:34:08.007
<v Speaker 4>used to try to put women of different shapes and

0:34:08.047 --> 0:34:10.647
<v Speaker 4>sizes on the cover of Cosmo. I had to fight

0:34:10.687 --> 0:34:12.247
<v Speaker 4>and fight and fight and fight for that, and I

0:34:12.327 --> 0:34:14.647
<v Speaker 4>kept saying it's good business, like forget about what your

0:34:14.687 --> 0:34:18.767
<v Speaker 4>personal preferences are. It's good business. But when you're trying

0:34:18.807 --> 0:34:21.847
<v Speaker 4>to do something different and move away from the norm

0:34:22.367 --> 0:34:26.127
<v Speaker 4>and put forward a beauty standard that isn't the preferred

0:34:26.167 --> 0:34:30.047
<v Speaker 4>beauty standard of our culture, of course that's a risk.

0:34:30.247 --> 0:34:31.887
<v Speaker 1>And no one wants to take risks.

0:34:31.527 --> 0:34:36.567
<v Speaker 3>And Nicholas being trolled, so she rode on Instagram if

0:34:36.607 --> 0:34:38.887
<v Speaker 3>you have an opinion about my body, please don't share it.

0:34:39.167 --> 0:34:41.247
<v Speaker 3>I'm just one real life human being and it's really

0:34:41.287 --> 0:34:43.847
<v Speaker 3>hard to take the weight of thousands of opinions on

0:34:43.927 --> 0:34:46.647
<v Speaker 3>how you look being sent to you every day. So

0:34:46.727 --> 0:34:48.687
<v Speaker 3>even though there is one half of society that is

0:34:48.767 --> 0:34:51.847
<v Speaker 3>celebrating her, and I saw so many women on my

0:34:51.887 --> 0:34:55.327
<v Speaker 3>own social media kind of putting up Instagram stories being like,

0:34:55.647 --> 0:34:57.887
<v Speaker 3>oh my gosh, I saw my body on screen. I

0:34:57.887 --> 0:35:01.367
<v Speaker 3>saw a woman's body with folds and moving in a

0:35:01.407 --> 0:35:03.407
<v Speaker 3>way that mine moves when I have sex.

0:35:03.927 --> 0:35:06.407
<v Speaker 1>So there's that side, but there's still these people that.

0:35:06.407 --> 0:35:10.047
<v Speaker 3>Are dropping into Nicholas dms being like you're not worthy.

0:35:10.207 --> 0:35:12.327
<v Speaker 4>It's also just not the shape of her body. It's

0:35:12.367 --> 0:35:17.607
<v Speaker 4>the idea of someone being sexual, like being portrayed in

0:35:17.647 --> 0:35:20.407
<v Speaker 4>a sexual way, because if you look at Rebel Wilson's career,

0:35:21.287 --> 0:35:23.967
<v Speaker 4>it's all just about comedy and the butt of the joke.

0:35:24.087 --> 0:35:27.887
<v Speaker 4>It's never about her actual desire and someone desiring her

0:35:28.607 --> 0:35:33.007
<v Speaker 4>without a gag. And even someone like Melissa McCarthy. You know,

0:35:33.047 --> 0:35:35.807
<v Speaker 4>you look at the women who are not straight sized

0:35:35.847 --> 0:35:38.767
<v Speaker 4>who are in Hollywood, and they are played for laughs generally.

0:35:39.007 --> 0:35:41.487
<v Speaker 4>And that's not a criticism of those women in particular,

0:35:41.527 --> 0:35:44.207
<v Speaker 4>because my god, there's so little work and it's so hard.

0:35:44.727 --> 0:35:47.887
<v Speaker 4>Whatever they can do to get roles and work is great.

0:35:48.407 --> 0:35:51.687
<v Speaker 4>But I think that's the difference here portraying her as

0:35:51.727 --> 0:35:53.727
<v Speaker 4>a sexual creature, the same as Lena Dunham.

0:35:53.927 --> 0:35:56.727
<v Speaker 2>The massive success of Bridgeton has been that it's saucy scenes,

0:35:56.767 --> 0:35:58.527
<v Speaker 2>as I described them to my daughter when she's like,

0:35:58.527 --> 0:36:00.807
<v Speaker 2>why are you watching that show? And I'm like, it's saucy.

0:36:00.927 --> 0:36:06.567
<v Speaker 2>That's what anyway, the saucy scenes from the female gaze,

0:36:06.607 --> 0:36:08.527
<v Speaker 2>and that's what people love about them. Right, It's the

0:36:08.527 --> 0:36:11.607
<v Speaker 2>same with outline of female gaze is good for business,

0:36:11.647 --> 0:36:13.167
<v Speaker 2>but you know who else is being trolled, which is

0:36:13.167 --> 0:36:16.967
<v Speaker 2>interesting is Colin the man who plays Colin, because he

0:36:17.087 --> 0:36:19.567
<v Speaker 2>was pictured last week with his actual, real life new

0:36:19.567 --> 0:36:22.647
<v Speaker 2>girlfriend and she doesn't look like Nicola cochlan. She looks

0:36:22.887 --> 0:36:27.087
<v Speaker 2>much more like a very stereotypically hot young thing, and

0:36:27.327 --> 0:36:29.687
<v Speaker 2>the internet's lost its mind in fury at him. So

0:36:29.807 --> 0:36:34.247
<v Speaker 2>now it's like, it's like, how very dare you actually

0:36:34.287 --> 0:36:37.767
<v Speaker 2>not be that? So, you know, our expectations are enormous.

0:36:37.887 --> 0:36:39.487
<v Speaker 3>Do you think there will ever be a time when

0:36:39.687 --> 0:36:43.087
<v Speaker 3>this is not a conversation where we don't even have

0:36:43.127 --> 0:36:44.887
<v Speaker 3>to do a segment like this because it's a non event.

0:36:45.047 --> 0:36:46.927
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I'd like to think that. I just think

0:36:46.967 --> 0:36:50.527
<v Speaker 4>it's important without wanting to make things any harder. For

0:36:50.607 --> 0:36:55.647
<v Speaker 4>Nikola Coglin, it's important to applaud and recognize when something

0:36:56.087 --> 0:37:00.527
<v Speaker 4>is subversive and pushes the boundaries and support it so

0:37:00.567 --> 0:37:03.007
<v Speaker 4>that then the next time someone has to make that decision,

0:37:03.687 --> 0:37:06.687
<v Speaker 4>they also will push those boundaries and push those boundaries.

0:37:06.687 --> 0:37:09.047
<v Speaker 4>It's always hard being the first. So she's brave.

0:37:09.287 --> 0:37:12.807
<v Speaker 2>She's also unquestionably great, you know, like she creates shows,

0:37:12.807 --> 0:37:15.967
<v Speaker 2>she's a brilliant performer. She's great than this, Like, I'm

0:37:16.047 --> 0:37:17.647
<v Speaker 2>very glad she's having her moment.

0:37:17.727 --> 0:37:21.367
<v Speaker 3>Our entertainment podcast The Spill, had an interesting conversation about

0:37:21.367 --> 0:37:22.047
<v Speaker 3>this on Friday.

0:37:22.087 --> 0:37:22.767
<v Speaker 1>Here's a taste.

0:37:23.167 --> 0:37:25.567
<v Speaker 6>Obviously, the character of Colin is a lot more experienced

0:37:25.967 --> 0:37:29.527
<v Speaker 6>and a very experience and they talk about that in

0:37:29.567 --> 0:37:32.887
<v Speaker 6>the sex scene, which I thought was interesting. Obviously is

0:37:32.927 --> 0:37:35.647
<v Speaker 6>set hundreds of years ago, but it felt like a

0:37:35.687 --> 0:37:38.967
<v Speaker 6>conversation you'd almost be having now in modern times, about

0:37:38.967 --> 0:37:40.687
<v Speaker 6>like there's a lot of consent in and of him

0:37:40.687 --> 0:37:42.887
<v Speaker 6>saying like I'm about to do this? Is this okay?

0:37:43.487 --> 0:37:45.407
<v Speaker 3>A link to that episode will be in the show

0:37:45.447 --> 0:37:46.567
<v Speaker 3>notes out Louder.

0:37:46.647 --> 0:37:50.847
<v Speaker 4>Sometimes we need each other to help solve dilemmas. We

0:37:50.927 --> 0:37:53.767
<v Speaker 4>have a segment called group therapy where we help solve

0:37:53.927 --> 0:37:57.927
<v Speaker 4>a dilemma, and this week we solved the dilemma of

0:37:58.207 --> 0:38:00.807
<v Speaker 4>an out louder whose twenty three year old daughter was

0:38:00.847 --> 0:38:02.887
<v Speaker 4>out for her birthday. Her boss was there, and it

0:38:03.047 --> 0:38:06.327
<v Speaker 4>ended in some really inappropriate behavior from her boss and

0:38:06.367 --> 0:38:08.727
<v Speaker 4>a whole lot of other men there. And we had

0:38:08.767 --> 0:38:11.327
<v Speaker 4>a really interesting conversation.

0:38:10.847 --> 0:38:13.367
<v Speaker 2>Didn't we hold Yes, I'm not sure we did solve it,

0:38:13.407 --> 0:38:16.487
<v Speaker 2>to be honest, but like I've been replaying that conversation

0:38:16.567 --> 0:38:19.247
<v Speaker 2>in my head all weekend, and I.

0:38:19.167 --> 0:38:21.407
<v Speaker 4>Know out louders have here's a little stening peak of

0:38:21.407 --> 0:38:22.127
<v Speaker 4>how it went down.

0:38:22.687 --> 0:38:25.607
<v Speaker 2>I can't believe that you said that she should change

0:38:25.607 --> 0:38:26.007
<v Speaker 2>her job?

0:38:26.287 --> 0:38:26.927
<v Speaker 1>What do you mean?

0:38:27.007 --> 0:38:30.327
<v Speaker 2>Of course she shouldn't change her fucking job? Like that's outrageous.

0:38:30.327 --> 0:38:32.327
<v Speaker 2>Why should he get to keep his job and as

0:38:32.327 --> 0:38:34.967
<v Speaker 2>sleazy coworkers get to keep his job and she has

0:38:35.007 --> 0:38:37.407
<v Speaker 2>to go through all the drama and change in trauma

0:38:37.407 --> 0:38:39.447
<v Speaker 2>of changing a job because I know he will end.

0:38:39.407 --> 0:38:41.847
<v Speaker 6>Up a job, keeping his job, and the only person

0:38:41.967 --> 0:38:44.767
<v Speaker 6>that will get really sad and about this and get

0:38:44.767 --> 0:38:46.167
<v Speaker 6>really hurt about this will be her.

0:38:46.447 --> 0:38:49.567
<v Speaker 2>My first line would be complain about him.

0:38:49.687 --> 0:38:51.327
<v Speaker 1>It's not always that simple.

0:38:52.007 --> 0:38:54.367
<v Speaker 4>If you want to hear what Holly m Vernam and

0:38:54.407 --> 0:38:57.167
<v Speaker 4>I thought and make up your own mind, we'll put

0:38:57.207 --> 0:38:59.207
<v Speaker 4>a link in the show notes you can listen to that.

0:38:59.287 --> 0:38:59.727
<v Speaker 1>Right now.

0:39:00.127 --> 0:39:02.087
<v Speaker 2>That is all we have time for on this Monday,

0:39:02.127 --> 0:39:04.327
<v Speaker 2>my friends. A big thank you to all of the

0:39:04.367 --> 0:39:07.047
<v Speaker 2>out louders for listening to our show and supporting it.

0:39:07.407 --> 0:39:10.447
<v Speaker 2>Tell your friends, share it all that we're having the

0:39:10.487 --> 0:39:13.047
<v Speaker 2>best conversations here on out loud, and thank you for

0:39:13.087 --> 0:39:15.207
<v Speaker 2>our team for helping us put together today's show. We'll

0:39:15.207 --> 0:39:16.687
<v Speaker 2>be back in your ears tomorrow.

0:39:16.727 --> 0:39:18.767
<v Speaker 1>Good Bye, bye bye.

0:39:19.327 --> 0:39:22.167
<v Speaker 2>Shout out to any MoMA Mia subscribers listening. If you

0:39:22.367 --> 0:39:25.207
<v Speaker 2>love the show and you want to support us, subscribing

0:39:25.247 --> 0:39:27.687
<v Speaker 2>to Momma Mia is the very best way to do it.

0:39:27.847 --> 0:39:29.727
<v Speaker 2>There's a link in the episode description