WEBVTT - “Another F***ing Woman” & The Census Question Starting Fights

0:00:03.080 --> 0:00:05.720
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to MoMA Mia out loud.

0:00:05.800 --> 0:00:08.360
<v Speaker 2>It's what women are actually talking about on Wednesday, the

0:00:08.400 --> 0:00:09.520
<v Speaker 2>twelfth of August.

0:00:09.960 --> 0:00:12.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm Holly Wayne Wright, I'm emm Vernon.

0:00:12.800 --> 0:00:13.840
<v Speaker 3>I'm Amelia Lester.

0:00:14.120 --> 0:00:17.720
<v Speaker 1>And here's what's on our agenda today. A famous politician

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:21.040
<v Speaker 1>is freezing her eggs and she's documenting her journey for

0:00:21.160 --> 0:00:22.080
<v Speaker 1>us all to see.

0:00:22.640 --> 0:00:26.080
<v Speaker 3>Plus the Brad Pitt profile which everyone is talking about

0:00:26.160 --> 0:00:27.920
<v Speaker 3>and which we can't agree on.

0:00:28.200 --> 0:00:30.960
<v Speaker 1>And another fucking woman. Am I right?

0:00:32.479 --> 0:00:37.680
<v Speaker 2>That is the sentiment we are unpacking today from several

0:00:37.680 --> 0:00:38.639
<v Speaker 2>troubling angles.

0:00:38.880 --> 0:00:41.120
<v Speaker 1>But first, Amelia Lester.

0:00:41.200 --> 0:00:45.240
<v Speaker 3>It's the census question getting every couple in Australia into

0:00:45.280 --> 0:00:48.680
<v Speaker 3>a fight. Yes, yesterday it was Christmas for demographers. It

0:00:48.800 --> 0:00:52.600
<v Speaker 3>was Census night in Australia and the government was stirring

0:00:52.760 --> 0:00:57.680
<v Speaker 3>up shit with one question in particular, which asked, in

0:00:57.760 --> 0:01:01.560
<v Speaker 3>the last week, did this person spend time doing unpaid

0:01:01.640 --> 0:01:05.400
<v Speaker 3>domestic work for their household and if so, how much?

0:01:06.440 --> 0:01:08.480
<v Speaker 3>How many couples do you think are doing the census

0:01:08.520 --> 0:01:11.320
<v Speaker 3>together and getting into huge arguments about whether or not

0:01:11.360 --> 0:01:13.800
<v Speaker 3>the other does more than five hours of household work

0:01:13.800 --> 0:01:19.040
<v Speaker 3>in a week, said one TikTok This TikTok from Lucy Oco,

0:01:19.080 --> 0:01:22.080
<v Speaker 3>I think captures the dynamic happening in many households across

0:01:22.080 --> 0:01:23.400
<v Speaker 3>Australia perfectly.

0:01:23.640 --> 0:01:26.399
<v Speaker 2>Now, this is the question that's getting everyone in Australia

0:01:26.400 --> 0:01:28.440
<v Speaker 2>and it can end up in a fight, which I

0:01:28.560 --> 0:01:30.080
<v Speaker 2>believe ours could.

0:01:31.040 --> 0:01:32.120
<v Speaker 3>In the last week.

0:01:32.400 --> 0:01:37.120
<v Speaker 1>Did Andrew spend time doing unpaid domestic work for their household?

0:01:38.319 --> 0:01:44.839
<v Speaker 3>No? Yes, there's the options are no, yes, did listen?

0:01:46.040 --> 0:01:46.120
<v Speaker 4>No?

0:01:47.319 --> 0:01:47.720
<v Speaker 3>Yes?

0:01:47.840 --> 0:01:49.040
<v Speaker 1>Less than five hours?

0:01:49.320 --> 0:01:52.560
<v Speaker 4>Yes, five to fourteen, yes, fifteen to twenty nine and

0:01:52.640 --> 0:01:56.480
<v Speaker 4>yes thirty hours. Five for it?

0:01:57.280 --> 0:01:57.880
<v Speaker 1>Fuck off?

0:02:00.240 --> 0:02:02.680
<v Speaker 3>Come on, be truth be truthful.

0:02:04.400 --> 0:02:06.200
<v Speaker 1>Well what do you do?

0:02:06.640 --> 0:02:06.920
<v Speaker 3>All right?

0:02:06.960 --> 0:02:08.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm taking less than five.

0:02:09.480 --> 0:02:09.960
<v Speaker 2>All the garden?

0:02:12.480 --> 0:02:16.160
<v Speaker 1>Oh that's true, thank you. Okay, that's an off week.

0:02:16.160 --> 0:02:27.040
<v Speaker 3>That's a rare week. Thanks be for real that she's

0:02:27.040 --> 0:02:27.880
<v Speaker 3>the one filling it in.

0:02:27.960 --> 0:02:30.800
<v Speaker 2>Well he just paces, just pacing around.

0:02:32.680 --> 0:02:35.480
<v Speaker 3>Did this inspire any controversy in your house?

0:02:36.400 --> 0:02:40.320
<v Speaker 2>Look? I saw it was funny because in my house

0:02:40.680 --> 0:02:43.200
<v Speaker 2>I wasn't there right, So the census actually made me

0:02:43.240 --> 0:02:45.480
<v Speaker 2>a bit sad because I'm a rule follower. Emma and

0:02:45.520 --> 0:02:48.080
<v Speaker 2>I had this argument yesterday. I was like, you have

0:02:48.160 --> 0:02:50.560
<v Speaker 2>to fill it in on Tuesday night, like it has

0:02:50.639 --> 0:02:54.080
<v Speaker 2>to be about where you are on Tuesday night, right,

0:02:54.400 --> 0:02:56.960
<v Speaker 2>which I was not at home with my family. I

0:02:57.040 --> 0:02:59.679
<v Speaker 2>was alone in a cheap hotel room.

0:03:00.080 --> 0:03:01.640
<v Speaker 3>The hotel do the sensors.

0:03:01.680 --> 0:03:05.040
<v Speaker 2>So yes, the hotel handed everyone who checked in on

0:03:05.160 --> 0:03:08.480
<v Speaker 2>Tuesday a census, and so I sat in my room.

0:03:08.480 --> 0:03:10.280
<v Speaker 2>And this is by the Bible. I promise, I'm getting

0:03:10.280 --> 0:03:12.160
<v Speaker 2>to your question. So yesterday I was saying to Am

0:03:12.240 --> 0:03:13.960
<v Speaker 2>I feel a bit sad about that, and she was like, well,

0:03:14.000 --> 0:03:15.639
<v Speaker 2>why didn't you just do it on the weekend.

0:03:15.840 --> 0:03:17.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, you can't do that. You have to do

0:03:17.760 --> 0:03:20.840
<v Speaker 1>it tonight, am I Right, Well, yeah, you you are right,

0:03:20.880 --> 0:03:23.919
<v Speaker 1>because things could have changed between the weekend and Tuesday.

0:03:24.680 --> 0:03:28.520
<v Speaker 1>I have a very, very like similar routine every single week.

0:03:28.560 --> 0:03:30.160
<v Speaker 1>I knew I was going to be home on Tuesday,

0:03:30.200 --> 0:03:32.680
<v Speaker 1>so I did my senses on the weekend in case

0:03:32.760 --> 0:03:34.679
<v Speaker 1>I was out on Tuesday and I didn't want to

0:03:34.720 --> 0:03:37.760
<v Speaker 1>come home and do the census. It doesn't matter anyway, Holly,

0:03:37.760 --> 0:03:40.480
<v Speaker 1>because your senses is technically wrong because you're actually single

0:03:40.560 --> 0:03:43.360
<v Speaker 1>according to this true, but that's another whole thing.

0:03:43.360 --> 0:03:45.560
<v Speaker 2>It was wouldn't let me tick, de facto, It would

0:03:45.600 --> 0:03:48.040
<v Speaker 2>only let me tick, never married.

0:03:48.480 --> 0:03:53.280
<v Speaker 1>Was on the same page.

0:03:51.520 --> 0:03:54.640
<v Speaker 3>Putting me in the end and never married did have

0:03:54.720 --> 0:03:55.960
<v Speaker 3>a hint of judgment about it.

0:03:56.040 --> 0:03:59.000
<v Speaker 1>Today it's never married loser.

0:03:58.960 --> 0:04:00.960
<v Speaker 3>Which character.

0:04:01.160 --> 0:04:04.560
<v Speaker 2>But back to your household, the housework questions, Amelia, which

0:04:04.600 --> 0:04:08.360
<v Speaker 2>is what we're here to discuss. I think I know

0:04:08.600 --> 0:04:11.360
<v Speaker 2>how many tense arguments that will have that will have

0:04:11.440 --> 0:04:13.839
<v Speaker 2>kicked off. But today I messaged Brent and I said,

0:04:13.880 --> 0:04:16.640
<v Speaker 2>what did you tick? And he said he ticked five hours?

0:04:17.040 --> 0:04:19.719
<v Speaker 2>And I was like, you do way more than that.

0:04:19.800 --> 0:04:21.719
<v Speaker 2>I must be with the only man in the.

0:04:21.720 --> 0:04:23.440
<v Speaker 1>World who underestimates what he does.

0:04:23.560 --> 0:04:25.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm like, you cook all the meals, you run around

0:04:25.760 --> 0:04:28.120
<v Speaker 2>after those children. You're driving them here and doing them there,

0:04:28.120 --> 0:04:30.320
<v Speaker 2>and cleaning up their mess and changing them Like.

0:04:30.600 --> 0:04:33.320
<v Speaker 3>Brent will also probably tell you exactly how tall he is.

0:04:34.720 --> 0:04:38.680
<v Speaker 1>True, so, but I can see this stirring up shit. Absolutely.

0:04:39.240 --> 0:04:41.280
<v Speaker 1>He was probably also the only man in the household

0:04:41.279 --> 0:04:46.479
<v Speaker 1>who was actually doing the sensors instead of just standing.

0:04:45.720 --> 0:04:47.560
<v Speaker 3>Five to fourteen five to fourteen.

0:04:47.839 --> 0:04:52.240
<v Speaker 1>I was like, you're doing the labor right now. US

0:04:52.320 --> 0:04:57.960
<v Speaker 1>Congresswoman Alexandria Occasio Cortez, also known as AOC, has publicly

0:04:58.000 --> 0:05:00.479
<v Speaker 1>revealed on social media that she's in the pro of

0:05:00.560 --> 0:05:04.080
<v Speaker 1>phrasing her eggs, and she's also vlogging her journey and

0:05:04.160 --> 0:05:07.400
<v Speaker 1>posting clips about it. Here's a little snippet.

0:05:07.920 --> 0:05:12.880
<v Speaker 3>Hello, everyone, welcome to my cooking show today.

0:05:12.960 --> 0:05:15.160
<v Speaker 5>Were making eggs.

0:05:16.320 --> 0:05:26.159
<v Speaker 4>Pen the qcaps that occurs. So today is my first ultrasound.

0:05:26.920 --> 0:05:30.600
<v Speaker 4>I don't want to say it's my first ultrasound overall. Basically,

0:05:31.279 --> 0:05:35.160
<v Speaker 4>my first first ultrasound was my fertility check where they

0:05:35.240 --> 0:05:39.440
<v Speaker 4>counted the number of follicles that I had. Now, when

0:05:39.440 --> 0:05:41.480
<v Speaker 4>you go in to get your fertility.

0:05:41.040 --> 0:05:42.520
<v Speaker 1>Checked, they do two things.

0:05:42.839 --> 0:05:46.119
<v Speaker 4>They give you an ultrasound where they count the number

0:05:46.120 --> 0:05:49.200
<v Speaker 4>of follicles that you have, and then they do blood

0:05:49.240 --> 0:05:52.320
<v Speaker 4>work to test something known as your AMH level.

0:05:52.839 --> 0:05:56.360
<v Speaker 1>So in the video, she's showing herself like taking injections.

0:05:56.400 --> 0:05:59.560
<v Speaker 1>She's talking about the costing, and she's also referring to

0:05:59.600 --> 0:06:04.120
<v Speaker 1>the broken US medical system. Later in an interview, she

0:06:04.160 --> 0:06:06.240
<v Speaker 1>said that she she's doing this because she wanted to

0:06:06.279 --> 0:06:10.599
<v Speaker 1>normalize conversations about fertility care, especially in the political environment

0:06:10.800 --> 0:06:14.359
<v Speaker 1>right now. So she's also been doing these things like

0:06:14.440 --> 0:06:16.720
<v Speaker 1>ask Me Anything. So she's doing a lot of content

0:06:16.760 --> 0:06:19.440
<v Speaker 1>on this right She's doing these series on her Instagram stories,

0:06:19.480 --> 0:06:24.200
<v Speaker 1>Ask me any things about the fertility freezing. And recently

0:06:24.360 --> 0:06:28.120
<v Speaker 1>someone asked, overall are people behaving? And I want to

0:06:28.120 --> 0:06:29.880
<v Speaker 1>play her response for you. This is what she said.

0:06:30.240 --> 0:06:36.839
<v Speaker 5>Overall, people have been tremendously positive and supportive, and I've

0:06:36.880 --> 0:06:42.040
<v Speaker 5>received messages from women, you know, girls as young as

0:06:42.080 --> 0:06:48.360
<v Speaker 5>fifteen and women in their late seventies talking about how

0:06:48.400 --> 0:06:51.279
<v Speaker 5>wonderful it's been to see. Of course, there are some

0:06:51.320 --> 0:06:54.000
<v Speaker 5>people who are going to say their thing. There was

0:06:54.040 --> 0:06:57.400
<v Speaker 5>one today that was harping about how old I am

0:06:57.480 --> 0:06:58.240
<v Speaker 5>and whatever.

0:06:59.040 --> 0:07:02.120
<v Speaker 1>And I find it very interesting because a.

0:07:02.080 --> 0:07:08.600
<v Speaker 5>Lot of these people who pressure women into having kids

0:07:08.640 --> 0:07:12.040
<v Speaker 5>at a young age or trying to create hysteria around

0:07:12.160 --> 0:07:15.000
<v Speaker 5>being too old, et cetera. What they're trying to do

0:07:15.080 --> 0:07:18.560
<v Speaker 5>is rush you into having a relationship with a loser.

0:07:21.160 --> 0:07:25.720
<v Speaker 1>A AOC. So if you look at her Instagram right now,

0:07:25.880 --> 0:07:27.800
<v Speaker 1>all like her content that she's making out all of

0:07:27.840 --> 0:07:31.040
<v Speaker 1>these blogs about the processes of freezing at eggs. Alongside

0:07:31.080 --> 0:07:33.840
<v Speaker 1>that she's answering all of these questions, she's going through procedures,

0:07:33.840 --> 0:07:36.840
<v Speaker 1>she's talking about costing, and she also says that she's

0:07:36.880 --> 0:07:39.960
<v Speaker 1>doing this even though she understands there is a political

0:07:40.120 --> 0:07:42.880
<v Speaker 1>risk to doing it. Yeah, because she actually hasn't ruled

0:07:42.880 --> 0:07:44.679
<v Speaker 1>out running for president either.

0:07:45.400 --> 0:07:47.680
<v Speaker 2>That's what I want to hear from you on Amelia right,

0:07:47.760 --> 0:07:50.080
<v Speaker 2>because we're gearing up for.

0:07:50.120 --> 0:07:51.160
<v Speaker 1>Who's it going to be?

0:07:51.280 --> 0:07:53.600
<v Speaker 2>The Democratic candidate? Who's it going to be? And her

0:07:53.680 --> 0:07:58.160
<v Speaker 2>name is always in the hat? Yeah, and she's thirty six.

0:07:58.440 --> 0:08:01.000
<v Speaker 2>I think, so she's finally old in because she was

0:08:01.040 --> 0:08:03.000
<v Speaker 2>only twenty nine when she got elected and she be Kate.

0:08:03.120 --> 0:08:05.480
<v Speaker 2>She was a big deal because she was well, another

0:08:05.520 --> 0:08:07.400
<v Speaker 2>fucking woman to be talking about that.

0:08:08.040 --> 0:08:10.000
<v Speaker 1>She's quite young, because I hear you have to be

0:08:10.040 --> 0:08:11.480
<v Speaker 1>seventy to run for president.

0:08:13.040 --> 0:08:16.240
<v Speaker 2>Is it interesting that she's decided to do this from

0:08:16.240 --> 0:08:17.080
<v Speaker 2>a political person?

0:08:17.080 --> 0:08:20.880
<v Speaker 3>So interesting? I think her superpower is that she is

0:08:20.920 --> 0:08:25.280
<v Speaker 3>a politician who is also a normal person. She was

0:08:25.320 --> 0:08:28.400
<v Speaker 3>a bartender when she ran for the House of Representatives.

0:08:28.400 --> 0:08:32.400
<v Speaker 3>She represents a very smaller liberal seat in New York City,

0:08:33.440 --> 0:08:37.680
<v Speaker 3>and she has kept her humanity even as she has

0:08:37.760 --> 0:08:43.400
<v Speaker 3>now been in Congress for years, seven years. I remember

0:08:43.520 --> 0:08:47.000
<v Speaker 3>early on she was talking on Instagram about her skincare

0:08:47.120 --> 0:08:49.360
<v Speaker 3>routine back when, back at the start of COVID, when

0:08:49.400 --> 0:08:52.200
<v Speaker 3>everyone was obsessed with skin care. She hopped on to

0:08:52.320 --> 0:08:55.120
<v Speaker 3>answer some questions she'd gotten about her skincare routine. I

0:08:55.160 --> 0:08:58.000
<v Speaker 3>love that, which I love because look, she's got to

0:08:58.000 --> 0:09:00.480
<v Speaker 3>get up there in front of the public eye every

0:09:00.520 --> 0:09:04.520
<v Speaker 3>single day and talk, and women are scrutinized for their

0:09:04.520 --> 0:09:07.480
<v Speaker 3>appearance much more than men. And she was honest about

0:09:07.520 --> 0:09:09.480
<v Speaker 3>what she did in order to feel confident in front

0:09:09.480 --> 0:09:12.160
<v Speaker 3>of the camera. And then later on she led the

0:09:12.280 --> 0:09:15.600
<v Speaker 3>charge for the regulations around sunscreen in the US to

0:09:15.600 --> 0:09:19.240
<v Speaker 3>be changed because basically, long story short, the US looks

0:09:19.240 --> 0:09:22.160
<v Speaker 3>at Australia with envy at all of our wonderful sunscreens

0:09:22.200 --> 0:09:25.560
<v Speaker 3>and they wanted more sunscreens like Australia's, but they hadn't

0:09:25.640 --> 0:09:28.880
<v Speaker 3>updated their regulations. That's a topic that's very important to

0:09:28.960 --> 0:09:32.320
<v Speaker 3>young women. And she got on social and said, here's

0:09:32.320 --> 0:09:35.480
<v Speaker 3>why we need to change our sunscreen regulations. And now

0:09:35.640 --> 0:09:37.679
<v Speaker 3>she's taking us on the journey as a thirty six

0:09:37.760 --> 0:09:40.800
<v Speaker 3>year old woman freezing her eggs, which I think is

0:09:41.040 --> 0:09:43.520
<v Speaker 3>it is still quite a brave thing to do. I

0:09:43.559 --> 0:09:46.439
<v Speaker 3>looked into freezing my eggs when I was a few

0:09:46.559 --> 0:09:49.079
<v Speaker 3>years younger than her, many years ago now at this point,

0:09:49.559 --> 0:09:53.920
<v Speaker 3>and it felt really like a secret that I didn't

0:09:53.920 --> 0:09:55.679
<v Speaker 3>want to tell people. About I remember when I went

0:09:55.720 --> 0:09:58.439
<v Speaker 3>to the appointment to see a doctor and I only

0:09:58.480 --> 0:10:01.080
<v Speaker 3>told very few people in my social circle about it.

0:10:01.120 --> 0:10:03.240
<v Speaker 3>There was a sense of, like, it's come to this

0:10:03.640 --> 0:10:06.360
<v Speaker 3>about the whole thing. But she's so matter of fact

0:10:06.360 --> 0:10:08.520
<v Speaker 3>about it. She's so I'm getting on with it.

0:10:08.720 --> 0:10:12.200
<v Speaker 2>What I love about that. The beauty example that you

0:10:12.280 --> 0:10:15.800
<v Speaker 2>gave as well is that these are areas that a

0:10:15.880 --> 0:10:19.160
<v Speaker 2>previous generation of female politicians, and there weren't very many

0:10:19.240 --> 0:10:23.280
<v Speaker 2>of them, let's be honest, would never because you had

0:10:23.320 --> 0:10:26.480
<v Speaker 2>to be like, I'm just like a man.

0:10:26.679 --> 0:10:29.080
<v Speaker 3>Hillary Clinton would literally never tell you about her skin

0:10:29.120 --> 0:10:29.520
<v Speaker 3>carre it.

0:10:29.840 --> 0:10:32.880
<v Speaker 1>But like I'm like a man, yeap, I just look

0:10:33.040 --> 0:10:33.400
<v Speaker 1>like this.

0:10:33.880 --> 0:10:36.480
<v Speaker 2>I don't want you to think about the fact that

0:10:36.559 --> 0:10:39.880
<v Speaker 2>I but that my fertility is a thing. I don't

0:10:39.920 --> 0:10:41.680
<v Speaker 2>want you to think about the fact that I have

0:10:41.760 --> 0:10:44.920
<v Speaker 2>to spend longer than you do getting ready every morning.

0:10:45.200 --> 0:10:47.840
<v Speaker 2>That if I'm talking about lipstick, that makes me frivolous

0:10:47.840 --> 0:10:51.160
<v Speaker 2>and therefore you'll dismiss me. If I'm talking about fertility,

0:10:51.240 --> 0:10:53.120
<v Speaker 2>it means, oh my god, she might have a baby.

0:10:53.160 --> 0:10:56.840
<v Speaker 2>That means she couldn't possibly be president. Those were kind

0:10:56.840 --> 0:11:02.439
<v Speaker 2>of really accepted rules for females stepping into big public arenas.

0:11:03.480 --> 0:11:05.880
<v Speaker 2>And I bet that's why there was a little bit

0:11:05.880 --> 0:11:09.000
<v Speaker 2>of me when I saw this, because it's only this

0:11:09.080 --> 0:11:11.360
<v Speaker 2>week and it's got her a lot of attention, which

0:11:11.600 --> 0:11:15.320
<v Speaker 2>she's a very smart communicator. To your point, Amelia, we've

0:11:15.320 --> 0:11:17.680
<v Speaker 2>been talking about this a lot about politicians who understand

0:11:17.720 --> 0:11:20.320
<v Speaker 2>how to use social media. She is absolutely one of

0:11:20.320 --> 0:11:24.239
<v Speaker 2>those people. A little bit of my programming kind of went, oh,

0:11:24.520 --> 0:11:27.360
<v Speaker 2>but you're going to give people a stick to beat

0:11:27.400 --> 0:11:30.960
<v Speaker 2>you with metaphorically obviously, like in terms of well, you

0:11:31.040 --> 0:11:33.559
<v Speaker 2>can't be president at the timing of this might all

0:11:33.559 --> 0:11:35.160
<v Speaker 2>be you know what I mean, Like this makes you

0:11:35.240 --> 0:11:37.840
<v Speaker 2>start going that way in the same way that I

0:11:37.880 --> 0:11:40.560
<v Speaker 2>think I've probably internalized a lot of stuff about not

0:11:40.559 --> 0:11:43.640
<v Speaker 2>talking too much about hormones, not talking too much about

0:11:44.440 --> 0:11:46.400
<v Speaker 2>what mood swings to do with.

0:11:46.320 --> 0:11:48.079
<v Speaker 1>Your what you always say to.

0:11:48.040 --> 0:11:50.520
<v Speaker 2>Me, em I'm in my face, and I'm always like, sure,

0:11:50.559 --> 0:11:53.040
<v Speaker 2>she's you don't want the men to think you can't.

0:11:53.240 --> 0:11:58.400
<v Speaker 2>And that's just so interesting that my programming makes me

0:11:58.559 --> 0:12:01.280
<v Speaker 2>kind of go, oh, I worry a bit about this,

0:12:01.920 --> 0:12:03.559
<v Speaker 2>whereas her view is like.

0:12:04.679 --> 0:12:06.839
<v Speaker 1>That's so super I don't have to pretend that I'm

0:12:06.880 --> 0:12:09.880
<v Speaker 1>a dude. Yeah, I also thought the same when I

0:12:10.000 --> 0:12:11.720
<v Speaker 1>first saw these videos. I was like, I feel like

0:12:11.760 --> 0:12:15.400
<v Speaker 1>this could be harmful for her campaign. But then the

0:12:15.440 --> 0:12:17.319
<v Speaker 1>other side of me is like, isn't that what we

0:12:17.400 --> 0:12:20.200
<v Speaker 1>want from our politicians, Like we're always so angry that

0:12:20.240 --> 0:12:23.480
<v Speaker 1>our politicians don't understand us because arre in this completely

0:12:23.520 --> 0:12:26.760
<v Speaker 1>different bracket. But here she is actually doing what so

0:12:26.880 --> 0:12:30.439
<v Speaker 1>many women are so sick about, like explaining about how

0:12:30.520 --> 0:12:33.000
<v Speaker 1>the US medical system is broken, and so many women

0:12:33.040 --> 0:12:35.320
<v Speaker 1>are saying that, and now she's actually going through the

0:12:35.360 --> 0:12:38.560
<v Speaker 1>process and outlining everything and doing that for women. Like

0:12:38.600 --> 0:12:41.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, this is exactly what we wanted our politicians

0:12:41.600 --> 0:12:43.559
<v Speaker 1>to be doing, to be able to relate to the

0:12:43.600 --> 0:12:45.000
<v Speaker 1>same things that we're doing as well.

0:12:45.120 --> 0:12:47.760
<v Speaker 3>That's a great point. It also dovetails. It happens to

0:12:47.800 --> 0:12:51.880
<v Speaker 3>dovetail with her political perspective, which is she is on

0:12:51.920 --> 0:12:55.560
<v Speaker 3>the far left, the left to the far left of

0:12:55.600 --> 0:12:58.839
<v Speaker 3>the US Democratic Party, which isn't especially far left by

0:12:58.840 --> 0:13:02.439
<v Speaker 3>our standards, but which is standards, And one tenet of

0:13:02.559 --> 0:13:06.319
<v Speaker 3>that part of the party is that they want public

0:13:06.360 --> 0:13:08.920
<v Speaker 3>health care for everyone, which is obviously not something that

0:13:08.960 --> 0:13:12.000
<v Speaker 3>exists in the US. So for her, to be freezing

0:13:12.040 --> 0:13:14.679
<v Speaker 3>her eggs talking about how hard it is to navigate

0:13:14.720 --> 0:13:18.000
<v Speaker 3>a healthcare system that is not freely accessible to everyone.

0:13:18.280 --> 0:13:20.960
<v Speaker 3>It happens to dovetail with her political.

0:13:20.520 --> 0:13:23.760
<v Speaker 2>Pup Anasinek would say, it doesn't happen to dovetail with

0:13:23.840 --> 0:13:28.040
<v Speaker 2>her political platform. It's a very useful you know, we're

0:13:28.040 --> 0:13:30.440
<v Speaker 2>living in an attention economy, right, it's a very useful

0:13:31.360 --> 0:13:35.559
<v Speaker 2>spotlight to shine on that. The other thing that I

0:13:35.640 --> 0:13:38.040
<v Speaker 2>think is interesting about this is there has also been

0:13:38.080 --> 0:13:41.720
<v Speaker 2>a bit of pearl clutching about making egg freezing so

0:13:42.800 --> 0:13:46.480
<v Speaker 2>such a mainstream idea in terms of that that kind

0:13:46.520 --> 0:13:50.640
<v Speaker 2>of fertility treatment doesn't guarantee any success all of these things,

0:13:50.679 --> 0:13:52.679
<v Speaker 2>and some people are very cynical that it just makes

0:13:52.720 --> 0:13:58.400
<v Speaker 2>a lot of money for certain fertility organizations, fertility based organizations,

0:13:59.360 --> 0:14:02.480
<v Speaker 2>well big fi yeah, what we might call big farma,

0:14:03.200 --> 0:14:06.040
<v Speaker 2>And so is that Do you think there's a risk

0:14:06.120 --> 0:14:07.880
<v Speaker 2>there too. Do you think that some people are going

0:14:07.920 --> 0:14:10.760
<v Speaker 2>to be a bit mad with her about this from

0:14:10.760 --> 0:14:12.679
<v Speaker 2>that perspective or do you think that's done?

0:14:12.760 --> 0:14:15.640
<v Speaker 1>I think it's so done. Exactly what she says, like,

0:14:16.160 --> 0:14:18.000
<v Speaker 1>she's not saying that she wants to have a baby

0:14:18.080 --> 0:14:19.960
<v Speaker 1>right now, she just says that she wants to have

0:14:19.960 --> 0:14:22.880
<v Speaker 1>that She's by freezing her egg She's saying she basically

0:14:22.920 --> 0:14:24.600
<v Speaker 1>just wants to have that option if she wants to

0:14:24.640 --> 0:14:25.040
<v Speaker 1>have kids.

0:14:25.120 --> 0:14:26.920
<v Speaker 2>Is she opening a door for people to ask lots

0:14:26.920 --> 0:14:29.440
<v Speaker 2>of questions about her private life? Because what I noticed

0:14:29.680 --> 0:14:34.080
<v Speaker 2>was she was engaged and her fiance was quite like

0:14:34.160 --> 0:14:37.160
<v Speaker 2>part of her campaigning and stuff, and one of the

0:14:37.200 --> 0:14:39.000
<v Speaker 2>FoST Again, I'm admitting a lot of things I'm not

0:14:39.000 --> 0:14:40.440
<v Speaker 2>proud of right now. One of the first things I

0:14:40.440 --> 0:14:41.760
<v Speaker 2>thought when I saw this is I was like, Oh,

0:14:41.760 --> 0:14:44.520
<v Speaker 2>I wonder if she's still with that guy. She's also

0:14:44.640 --> 0:14:47.160
<v Speaker 2>accepting that people are going to talk about her private life,

0:14:47.240 --> 0:14:48.440
<v Speaker 2>right and that so what.

0:14:48.640 --> 0:14:50.360
<v Speaker 1>Well, I think she's getting ahead of it now by

0:14:50.400 --> 0:14:52.560
<v Speaker 1>doing they ask me any things, and by having it

0:14:52.600 --> 0:14:55.320
<v Speaker 1>on her own own social she's putting it out there

0:14:55.640 --> 0:14:58.560
<v Speaker 1>without actually having to answer a questions she doesn't want to,

0:14:58.880 --> 0:15:03.160
<v Speaker 1>basically saying that the reason people get so mad about

0:15:03.400 --> 0:15:07.840
<v Speaker 1>women having children later in life, it's because they essentially

0:15:07.920 --> 0:15:10.120
<v Speaker 1>want you to have kids with a loser. I love

0:15:10.160 --> 0:15:11.760
<v Speaker 1>that life if we don't want to have kids with

0:15:11.800 --> 0:15:13.960
<v Speaker 1>a loser. So if we freeze our eggs, now we

0:15:13.960 --> 0:15:16.920
<v Speaker 1>could eventually have children on our own terms with whoever

0:15:17.000 --> 0:15:17.440
<v Speaker 1>we want.

0:15:17.600 --> 0:15:21.360
<v Speaker 3>There was actually Claudia Golden, who is this Nobel Prize

0:15:21.360 --> 0:15:24.240
<v Speaker 3>winning economist, has recently published a paper that's really changing

0:15:24.320 --> 0:15:27.520
<v Speaker 3>the conversation on this. She says that rather than put

0:15:27.520 --> 0:15:30.480
<v Speaker 3>all the blame for the fertility crisis on women, men

0:15:30.720 --> 0:15:32.720
<v Speaker 3>need to be better so that women want to have

0:15:32.880 --> 0:15:37.320
<v Speaker 3>children with them. So that conversation is shifting, and as usual,

0:15:37.440 --> 0:15:40.520
<v Speaker 3>AOC is riding the wave and is ahead of the

0:15:40.560 --> 0:15:41.960
<v Speaker 3>pack in talking about it.

0:15:42.120 --> 0:15:46.240
<v Speaker 2>When I interviewed Desindra Adun, we talked about that earlier

0:15:46.240 --> 0:15:46.720
<v Speaker 2>this year.

0:15:47.000 --> 0:15:48.160
<v Speaker 1>She and her memoir.

0:15:48.240 --> 0:15:50.480
<v Speaker 2>She talked about how she found out she was pregnant

0:15:51.440 --> 0:15:53.680
<v Speaker 2>with the same time she found out she was going

0:15:53.720 --> 0:15:57.120
<v Speaker 2>to be Prime minister, and that those two things seemed

0:15:58.280 --> 0:16:02.240
<v Speaker 2>like an enormous obvis were enormous life changing moments that

0:16:02.480 --> 0:16:06.840
<v Speaker 2>were colliding. And there's an immediate argument of like, well,

0:16:06.880 --> 0:16:09.160
<v Speaker 2>oh you can't, you can't do that, You can't do

0:16:09.200 --> 0:16:10.360
<v Speaker 2>those two things at once.

0:16:11.200 --> 0:16:13.680
<v Speaker 1>But she, I mean, I known New Zealand and America

0:16:13.680 --> 0:16:15.080
<v Speaker 1>a very different places.

0:16:14.720 --> 0:16:20.280
<v Speaker 2>But she proved that you can't very very with very

0:16:20.280 --> 0:16:23.640
<v Speaker 2>different conversations about these things in different competing forces, the

0:16:23.760 --> 0:16:25.400
<v Speaker 2>kind of working at it, but.

0:16:25.720 --> 0:16:27.720
<v Speaker 1>She proved that you absolutely can.

0:16:28.320 --> 0:16:30.280
<v Speaker 2>And whenever I think about that, I think that it's

0:16:30.400 --> 0:16:33.680
<v Speaker 2>it was often seen as like, oh, you know, almost

0:16:33.720 --> 0:16:36.920
<v Speaker 2>like a sad thing, but actually no man had ever

0:16:36.960 --> 0:16:39.440
<v Speaker 2>achieved what she achieved. It makes her, in my mind,

0:16:39.600 --> 0:16:42.840
<v Speaker 2>like a very impressive person that you could do those

0:16:42.840 --> 0:16:43.600
<v Speaker 2>two things at once.

0:16:43.760 --> 0:16:46.320
<v Speaker 1>Do you think if just Cinda r Dern did what

0:16:46.440 --> 0:16:50.120
<v Speaker 1>AOC was doing and just said that before she was

0:16:50.200 --> 0:16:53.360
<v Speaker 1>running for prime minister she was on a journey to

0:16:53.400 --> 0:16:57.200
<v Speaker 1>appreciate actually was she was actually doing it? No, she didn't.

0:16:57.240 --> 0:16:58.920
<v Speaker 1>If she announced it, do you think that would have

0:16:58.960 --> 0:17:00.440
<v Speaker 1>impacted her?

0:17:01.120 --> 0:17:04.760
<v Speaker 2>It's really interesting because she famously was put on the

0:17:04.800 --> 0:17:08.160
<v Speaker 2>spot on a TV show about before she became having

0:17:08.160 --> 0:17:10.800
<v Speaker 2>a about whether or not she was planning to have kids,

0:17:10.840 --> 0:17:13.520
<v Speaker 2>and she was really furious about the question, and she

0:17:13.720 --> 0:17:16.320
<v Speaker 2>was sort of not furious, but she made a point

0:17:16.359 --> 0:17:18.600
<v Speaker 2>about that question being one that you wouldn't aim at

0:17:18.640 --> 0:17:22.760
<v Speaker 2>a man. And that's the interesting truth is absolutely true,

0:17:22.920 --> 0:17:26.600
<v Speaker 2>is that people don't ask men those questions, but also

0:17:26.640 --> 0:17:29.280
<v Speaker 2>a bit of a willful like it is different because

0:17:29.359 --> 0:17:30.720
<v Speaker 2>the men aren't going to be pregnant.

0:17:30.800 --> 0:17:34.520
<v Speaker 3>I just hope that Barnaby Joyce is finding juggling true

0:17:35.119 --> 0:17:38.440
<v Speaker 3>a young child and a political career. I hope he's

0:17:38.480 --> 0:17:39.240
<v Speaker 3>doing okay and.

0:17:39.240 --> 0:17:42.240
<v Speaker 1>A dog to talk allegedly.

0:17:42.800 --> 0:17:45.960
<v Speaker 3>In a moment the celebrity profile, which we just can't

0:17:46.000 --> 0:17:50.199
<v Speaker 3>agree on. I've got to be honest with you. So

0:17:50.280 --> 0:17:53.400
<v Speaker 3>we have a slack channel at work where we post

0:17:53.520 --> 0:17:55.439
<v Speaker 3>links of things that we might want to talk about

0:17:55.480 --> 0:17:57.800
<v Speaker 3>on the show in and you're always you post some

0:17:57.840 --> 0:18:00.919
<v Speaker 3>really good links in there. But you posted on on

0:18:00.960 --> 0:18:02.520
<v Speaker 3>Monday that I just thought, I'm not going to read that,

0:18:03.720 --> 0:18:04.960
<v Speaker 3>and I moved on with my day.

0:18:06.080 --> 0:18:08.240
<v Speaker 1>I think next time you should literally comment not going

0:18:08.320 --> 0:18:08.880
<v Speaker 1>to read.

0:18:09.240 --> 0:18:13.200
<v Speaker 3>Just the emoji of the cross. It was a profile

0:18:13.240 --> 0:18:16.520
<v Speaker 3>of Brad Pitt in the men's magazine Esquiet. Now, I'm

0:18:16.520 --> 0:18:18.800
<v Speaker 3>sure a lot of listeners now are also thinking the

0:18:18.920 --> 0:18:21.760
<v Speaker 3>exact same thing that I thought, which is, nope, not

0:18:21.840 --> 0:18:25.479
<v Speaker 3>interested in moving on with my life. But then, as usual,

0:18:25.560 --> 0:18:28.239
<v Speaker 3>am You've got your finger on the pulse, because then

0:18:28.280 --> 0:18:32.160
<v Speaker 3>I kept hearing people talking about that profile, and even

0:18:32.200 --> 0:18:34.359
<v Speaker 3>though I'm not at all interested in Brad Pitt and

0:18:34.400 --> 0:18:37.440
<v Speaker 3>I am perhaps even repelled by him. Sorry, Holly, Once

0:18:37.480 --> 0:18:41.000
<v Speaker 3>I read it, I actually couldn't stop thinking about it.

0:18:42.160 --> 0:18:45.000
<v Speaker 3>I joined the crowd of people thinking and talking about

0:18:45.000 --> 0:18:48.000
<v Speaker 3>this profile. It's called a Monday with Brad Pitt. And

0:18:48.040 --> 0:18:49.720
<v Speaker 3>what's interesting about it is that it takes you on

0:18:49.720 --> 0:18:51.640
<v Speaker 3>a bit of a journey, because at first you think

0:18:51.680 --> 0:18:54.800
<v Speaker 3>it's just going to be another puff piece, another step

0:18:54.840 --> 0:18:58.000
<v Speaker 3>in his image rehabilitation tour, because Angie and the kids

0:18:58.000 --> 0:19:01.280
<v Speaker 3>don't talk to him anymore. It begins the sixty two

0:19:01.359 --> 0:19:04.280
<v Speaker 3>year old has lived a singular life. He resides in

0:19:04.320 --> 0:19:06.920
<v Speaker 3>the top one percent of the top one percent of

0:19:07.000 --> 0:19:11.119
<v Speaker 3>all movie stars, not only today but ever, as measured

0:19:11.119 --> 0:19:14.320
<v Speaker 3>by any metric you like, including intrigue. What does he

0:19:14.400 --> 0:19:17.000
<v Speaker 3>have to say about it all? And you just read

0:19:17.040 --> 0:19:18.560
<v Speaker 3>that and you think, I don't care what he has

0:19:18.600 --> 0:19:19.360
<v Speaker 3>to say about it all?

0:19:19.640 --> 0:19:20.360
<v Speaker 1>But you do care.

0:19:20.400 --> 0:19:23.240
<v Speaker 3>I do care. And then you start reading and then

0:19:23.280 --> 0:19:27.000
<v Speaker 3>you realize that this piece is the takedown that we've

0:19:27.040 --> 0:19:29.960
<v Speaker 3>all been waiting for. Well, I think it's the takedown

0:19:29.960 --> 0:19:31.840
<v Speaker 3>of Brad Pitt that we've all been waiting for. Holly

0:19:32.119 --> 0:19:34.440
<v Speaker 3>is sitting here with her head in her hand, shaking

0:19:34.480 --> 0:19:34.920
<v Speaker 3>her head.

0:19:35.520 --> 0:19:37.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it is. Oh, what made you think

0:19:37.720 --> 0:19:38.840
<v Speaker 1>it was? So?

0:19:39.160 --> 0:19:41.280
<v Speaker 3>The big Newsworthy thing to come out of it is

0:19:41.320 --> 0:19:44.240
<v Speaker 3>that he says that after seven years of being sober,

0:19:44.480 --> 0:19:45.920
<v Speaker 3>he is now back on the wagon.

0:19:46.119 --> 0:19:46.880
<v Speaker 1>It's not good.

0:19:47.200 --> 0:19:50.920
<v Speaker 3>Which is not good That happened to commincide with a

0:19:51.040 --> 0:19:54.080
<v Speaker 3>rather shocking revelation I think in page six this week

0:19:54.200 --> 0:19:58.159
<v Speaker 3>that at Taylor Swift and Travis Kelsey's wedding he was

0:19:58.240 --> 0:20:00.520
<v Speaker 3>seen drinking. So it does you're true.

0:20:00.600 --> 0:20:03.159
<v Speaker 2>The reason that that is shocking, just for context, is

0:20:03.200 --> 0:20:05.520
<v Speaker 2>that and he will get in a lot of trouble

0:20:05.560 --> 0:20:08.040
<v Speaker 2>for that, I think because I've listened to his interview,

0:20:08.119 --> 0:20:10.280
<v Speaker 2>for example, with Dax Shepherd, where they talk a lot

0:20:10.320 --> 0:20:12.919
<v Speaker 2>about being in AA together. Yep, like he was quite

0:20:12.960 --> 0:20:18.639
<v Speaker 2>seriously sober and identifying that way and part of that community,

0:20:19.320 --> 0:20:21.200
<v Speaker 2>and now he's kind of like, oh, I just drink.

0:20:21.240 --> 0:20:23.800
<v Speaker 2>Sometimes there will be parts of that community who are

0:20:23.920 --> 0:20:25.960
<v Speaker 2>pretty pissed off about that situation.

0:20:27.040 --> 0:20:29.960
<v Speaker 3>Here are some other points that made him, I think,

0:20:30.040 --> 0:20:33.680
<v Speaker 3>look less than flattering. He spent several minutes in the

0:20:33.720 --> 0:20:34.960
<v Speaker 3>profile looking for a pen.

0:20:35.359 --> 0:20:39.080
<v Speaker 1>That part, for me was so sad because I can

0:20:39.160 --> 0:20:41.120
<v Speaker 1>just imagine that because the reason why he was looking

0:20:41.119 --> 0:20:42.480
<v Speaker 1>for a pen was because he wanted to get the

0:20:42.560 --> 0:20:45.439
<v Speaker 1>journalist's email addresses, and then as he's looking for it,

0:20:45.520 --> 0:20:47.000
<v Speaker 1>he's like, oh, I have something else to say, And

0:20:47.000 --> 0:20:49.880
<v Speaker 1>then I can just imagine the journalist going Brad pittneily

0:20:49.960 --> 0:20:54.040
<v Speaker 1>had my other dress. Know he's moved on.

0:20:54.640 --> 0:20:56.600
<v Speaker 2>You were really upset by the vision of him cutting

0:20:56.640 --> 0:20:57.600
<v Speaker 2>up cheese for their cheese.

0:20:57.640 --> 0:21:02.040
<v Speaker 1>Oh my god, He's just so alone and lonely. And

0:21:02.040 --> 0:21:04.520
<v Speaker 1>this is also why I think it didn't really feel

0:21:04.520 --> 0:21:07.639
<v Speaker 1>like a takedown to me, although I am absolutely repulsed

0:21:07.640 --> 0:21:11.679
<v Speaker 1>by him from this piece. I went into reading this

0:21:11.920 --> 0:21:13.560
<v Speaker 1>profile and we're linking in the show notes if you

0:21:13.560 --> 0:21:15.720
<v Speaker 1>want to read it hating Brad Pitt. Like I've just

0:21:15.720 --> 0:21:18.920
<v Speaker 1>always never liked Brad Pitt never never have you seen

0:21:18.920 --> 0:21:22.080
<v Speaker 1>Thomer and Louise? Yeah, But like I watched it when

0:21:22.080 --> 0:21:23.000
<v Speaker 1>I was like twenty.

0:21:22.840 --> 0:21:25.320
<v Speaker 3>Okay, wait is that gold or Yard.

0:21:26.240 --> 0:21:29.600
<v Speaker 1>Ten years ago? I think I was like a bit

0:21:29.680 --> 0:21:31.800
<v Speaker 1>old for it when I watched it for the first

0:21:31.880 --> 0:21:33.760
<v Speaker 1>When I watched it for the first time, like I

0:21:33.760 --> 0:21:36.400
<v Speaker 1>already understood what was going to happen. Everyone knows because

0:21:36.400 --> 0:21:38.960
<v Speaker 1>people talk about telling me all the time. So it

0:21:39.000 --> 0:21:42.960
<v Speaker 1>wasn't actually like spoiler alone. Yeah, I've changed it, Yeah,

0:21:43.480 --> 0:21:45.800
<v Speaker 1>ride or Die. I was like, oh, I know, you know,

0:21:45.920 --> 0:21:48.040
<v Speaker 1>I know what's going to happen. Okay, spoilers, I don't

0:21:48.040 --> 0:21:51.080
<v Speaker 1>want to say it. They die. Okay. Also, you already

0:21:51.119 --> 0:21:52.080
<v Speaker 1>knew what happened to Brad Pitt.

0:21:52.119 --> 0:21:56.040
<v Speaker 2>Ala knew if you watched that movie in situ, as in,

0:21:56.119 --> 0:21:59.199
<v Speaker 2>when it came out, the world all just went who

0:21:59.440 --> 0:22:03.399
<v Speaker 2>is that? Like one big intake breath. And that's not

0:22:03.440 --> 0:22:04.240
<v Speaker 2>the context.

0:22:04.440 --> 0:22:07.840
<v Speaker 1>I learned about him literally from my mum about talking

0:22:07.840 --> 0:22:11.719
<v Speaker 1>about the the Jennifer Aniston thing, and then I was like,

0:22:11.760 --> 0:22:13.960
<v Speaker 1>I love friends, so I love Jennifer Aniston, so I

0:22:13.960 --> 0:22:16.159
<v Speaker 1>hate Brad Pitt. So that's always been my thing. I

0:22:16.200 --> 0:22:17.040
<v Speaker 1>hate Brad Pitt.

0:22:17.720 --> 0:22:20.040
<v Speaker 3>Is this like a bedtime story being told to jen

0:22:20.400 --> 0:22:25.719
<v Speaker 3>It's like gun around. He was a princess of Hollywood

0:22:26.200 --> 0:22:27.440
<v Speaker 3>called Jennifer.

0:22:27.000 --> 0:22:30.320
<v Speaker 1>And everyone hates him. So I went into reading this

0:22:30.359 --> 0:22:32.560
<v Speaker 1>piece hating Brad Pitt, and I came out from reading

0:22:32.600 --> 0:22:34.159
<v Speaker 1>it feeling sorry for Brad Pitt.

0:22:34.200 --> 0:22:37.080
<v Speaker 2>That's the strategy. So this is why this is not

0:22:37.119 --> 0:22:40.000
<v Speaker 2>a takedown. This is the sad Brad strategy.

0:22:40.240 --> 0:22:40.440
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:22:40.560 --> 0:22:45.280
<v Speaker 2>He's so sad, Holly, Brad Pitt is living as he says.

0:22:45.359 --> 0:22:48.240
<v Speaker 2>The Journal says in the beginning of this the most

0:22:48.320 --> 0:22:52.880
<v Speaker 2>extraordinary life. He is richer than God. His career has

0:22:52.920 --> 0:22:55.440
<v Speaker 2>never been better. He gets to do whatever he wants.

0:22:55.480 --> 0:22:58.880
<v Speaker 2>He's dating a gorgeous young woman. But there is a problem,

0:22:59.040 --> 0:23:01.719
<v Speaker 2>and that is that he's been revealed to be at

0:23:01.800 --> 0:23:05.919
<v Speaker 2>best a bad husband to two of the most famous

0:23:05.920 --> 0:23:09.640
<v Speaker 2>women in the world, at worst an abuser of one

0:23:09.680 --> 0:23:12.800
<v Speaker 2>of those women, and at best a bad father and

0:23:12.840 --> 0:23:15.280
<v Speaker 2>at worst an abusive father. And that none of his

0:23:15.359 --> 0:23:17.520
<v Speaker 2>children talk to him. Now, that's a problem you've got

0:23:17.520 --> 0:23:21.240
<v Speaker 2>to address, right. But there is a massive market out

0:23:21.280 --> 0:23:26.040
<v Speaker 2>there of middle aged, disaffected, middle aged men who are

0:23:26.080 --> 0:23:29.480
<v Speaker 2>mad with their ex wives. Marina Hyde talks about them

0:23:29.480 --> 0:23:32.040
<v Speaker 2>a lot, actually, on the rest of Entertainment. She calls

0:23:32.080 --> 0:23:35.080
<v Speaker 2>them the middle aged men crying in cars on their

0:23:35.080 --> 0:23:37.880
<v Speaker 2>way home from work, and she says that's why Matt

0:23:37.960 --> 0:23:41.080
<v Speaker 2>Damon got cast in the Odyssey, not that he personally

0:23:41.160 --> 0:23:42.800
<v Speaker 2>is one of them, but he speaks to them. There's

0:23:42.800 --> 0:23:46.399
<v Speaker 2>a certain kind of like mainstream middle aged dude who

0:23:46.440 --> 0:23:49.680
<v Speaker 2>speaks to them. Pauline Hanson is talking to them when

0:23:49.680 --> 0:23:52.440
<v Speaker 2>she bangs on about family Court, like there's all.

0:23:52.200 --> 0:23:53.439
<v Speaker 3>Like Kent Thoma and Louise.

0:23:54.960 --> 0:23:59.640
<v Speaker 2>She would have been so bad, But like there's a

0:24:00.119 --> 0:24:04.240
<v Speaker 2>this is a legitimate market you're playing to and painting

0:24:04.320 --> 0:24:09.160
<v Speaker 2>Brad Pitt, as this article does, as a slightly lonely

0:24:10.240 --> 0:24:12.080
<v Speaker 2>that he talks about mental health like he's got a

0:24:12.119 --> 0:24:14.640
<v Speaker 2>problem in that he has to appear vulnerable but still

0:24:14.720 --> 0:24:19.760
<v Speaker 2>keep all his masculinity because that's his appeal, right, So.

0:24:18.920 --> 0:24:20.320
<v Speaker 1>He's like, I'm a little bit sad.

0:24:21.119 --> 0:24:23.640
<v Speaker 2>I did think about some very dark time, went through

0:24:23.640 --> 0:24:27.080
<v Speaker 2>some very dark times because of family issues. Everybody knows

0:24:27.119 --> 0:24:30.359
<v Speaker 2>what he's talking to. Just imagine a woman in his

0:24:30.440 --> 0:24:32.399
<v Speaker 2>position and the journal going over to eat cheese with

0:24:32.480 --> 0:24:34.600
<v Speaker 2>him and being like, none of your six children talk

0:24:34.640 --> 0:24:36.960
<v Speaker 2>to you cool like that, it's not a thing that

0:24:36.960 --> 0:24:41.000
<v Speaker 2>would happen. So I think that portraying him as a

0:24:41.040 --> 0:24:43.920
<v Speaker 2>little bit of a lonely sad like the world's been

0:24:43.960 --> 0:24:45.960
<v Speaker 2>mean to me, dude, is a deliberate play.

0:24:46.119 --> 0:24:50.639
<v Speaker 3>There is form for that for sad Brad because I

0:24:50.680 --> 0:24:53.359
<v Speaker 3>know you remember, Holly, I'll have to explain this thing,

0:24:53.440 --> 0:24:57.080
<v Speaker 3>you am. But in twenty seventeen, Sad Brad made his

0:24:57.160 --> 0:25:00.399
<v Speaker 3>first appearance. This was just after the news had broken

0:25:00.520 --> 0:25:04.560
<v Speaker 3>about he and Angelina splitting up, and he did a

0:25:04.600 --> 0:25:07.919
<v Speaker 3>photo shoot for GQ Style, where he went to various

0:25:07.960 --> 0:25:12.640
<v Speaker 3>American national parks in expensive nitwear, and he looked gaunt

0:25:12.760 --> 0:25:16.760
<v Speaker 3>and kind of upset. And in the article he talked

0:25:16.760 --> 0:25:19.840
<v Speaker 3>about sculpture. One of the quotes that I love from

0:25:19.840 --> 0:25:22.960
<v Speaker 3>this to this day, I'm working with clay plaster, would

0:25:23.160 --> 0:25:26.440
<v Speaker 3>just trying to learn the materials. You know, I surprise myself.

0:25:27.040 --> 0:25:30.200
<v Speaker 3>So he has history of trying to sort of get

0:25:30.280 --> 0:25:34.200
<v Speaker 3>sympathy by looking sad in men's magazines. That is true, Holly,

0:25:34.640 --> 0:25:37.240
<v Speaker 3>But I think we're not buying what he's selling anymore.

0:25:37.240 --> 0:25:38.880
<v Speaker 1>Well we're not, but we're not the audience.

0:25:39.160 --> 0:25:41.000
<v Speaker 3>But I don't know if the journalist is like, I'm

0:25:41.040 --> 0:25:43.000
<v Speaker 3>just going to give you another example. His girlfriend of

0:25:43.080 --> 0:25:45.000
<v Speaker 3>several years that I know that we've talked about before,

0:25:45.040 --> 0:25:48.520
<v Speaker 3>Inez de Ramone, who is thirty three. She gets mentioned

0:25:48.520 --> 0:25:52.000
<v Speaker 3>precisely once in this whole article, and it's inner parenthetical

0:25:52.040 --> 0:25:54.520
<v Speaker 3>about how she is good at packing luggage.

0:25:55.080 --> 0:25:56.159
<v Speaker 1>Maybe she's really good at it.

0:25:56.240 --> 0:25:58.960
<v Speaker 2>But again, David, it wouldn't be good for Brad's image

0:25:58.960 --> 0:26:02.040
<v Speaker 2>to be like, I'm deliri happy with this gorgeous young woman.

0:26:02.119 --> 0:26:02.639
<v Speaker 1>He wants.

0:26:03.000 --> 0:26:05.960
<v Speaker 2>He wants to play that down like it's the whole

0:26:06.000 --> 0:26:10.439
<v Speaker 2>thing is like that. He's kind of playing to my

0:26:10.680 --> 0:26:13.280
<v Speaker 2>ex wife. He can't say it out loud, but he's like,

0:26:13.440 --> 0:26:16.119
<v Speaker 2>I am a victim here. She's been bad mouthing me

0:26:16.240 --> 0:26:19.760
<v Speaker 2>to the kids. I'm now disconnected from my family, Like

0:26:19.840 --> 0:26:21.879
<v Speaker 2>he kind of he can't say that, but he kind

0:26:21.920 --> 0:26:22.679
<v Speaker 2>of nods to it.

0:26:22.720 --> 0:26:25.560
<v Speaker 1>I think it's part of a play. I do the

0:26:25.600 --> 0:26:28.439
<v Speaker 1>whole thing to me. I was just like from the

0:26:28.520 --> 0:26:33.280
<v Speaker 1>cutting the cheese by himself a secuitary board and then

0:26:33.320 --> 0:26:36.359
<v Speaker 1>bringing out a bowl of grapes that he had only

0:26:36.440 --> 0:26:38.760
<v Speaker 1>just washed and was like plucking them.

0:26:39.320 --> 0:26:40.639
<v Speaker 3>What about the Pits line?

0:26:40.760 --> 0:26:44.719
<v Speaker 1>The pits line where the journalist was like, oh, I'm

0:26:44.760 --> 0:26:47.240
<v Speaker 1>getting the royal treatment, and Brad was like, just another

0:26:47.320 --> 0:26:48.160
<v Speaker 1>day at the pits.

0:26:48.359 --> 0:26:48.879
<v Speaker 2>It's just you.

0:26:51.280 --> 0:26:55.480
<v Speaker 1>In the pits, am, You're the tiebreaker here, outfits so

0:26:55.600 --> 0:26:57.120
<v Speaker 1>bad and the journalist thinks it's cool.

0:26:57.280 --> 0:26:59.639
<v Speaker 3>I'm sorry, So you think the journalist thinks this is

0:26:59.640 --> 0:27:02.800
<v Speaker 3>all because my argument is that as a society we

0:27:02.880 --> 0:27:04.280
<v Speaker 3>can now see through sad.

0:27:04.359 --> 0:27:06.920
<v Speaker 1>Brad like, that's my argument. I don't think we can

0:27:07.000 --> 0:27:09.800
<v Speaker 1>see through it. I think I just felt really sad

0:27:09.840 --> 0:27:11.760
<v Speaker 1>for him, and I felt like he got that journalist

0:27:11.800 --> 0:27:14.880
<v Speaker 1>to fall in love with him, and the whole thing

0:27:15.040 --> 0:27:17.879
<v Speaker 1>read as like he's so sad we should feel so

0:27:18.080 --> 0:27:20.280
<v Speaker 1>for him. Look at him in this big, beautiful mansion.

0:27:20.520 --> 0:27:22.119
<v Speaker 1>The only thing on his mind is what he's going

0:27:22.160 --> 0:27:23.440
<v Speaker 1>to order before he goes to bed.

0:27:23.520 --> 0:27:26.959
<v Speaker 3>Like the end of the story is like he asks, Brad,

0:27:27.240 --> 0:27:29.240
<v Speaker 3>you know top one percent of one percent of movies

0:27:29.280 --> 0:27:31.760
<v Speaker 3>stars ever, So what are you up to tonight? And

0:27:31.840 --> 0:27:34.680
<v Speaker 3>Brad says, think I might order some food, but I don't.

0:27:35.480 --> 0:27:36.160
<v Speaker 3>But that's what.

0:27:38.359 --> 0:27:40.399
<v Speaker 1>And he just had like the World Cup playing in

0:27:40.440 --> 0:27:43.119
<v Speaker 1>the background, and he's like, look at that guy's fake acting.

0:27:43.200 --> 0:27:44.320
<v Speaker 1>That's why I can't watch porn.

0:27:44.400 --> 0:27:47.320
<v Speaker 2>That was acting so bad that it was a great line.

0:27:47.440 --> 0:27:49.960
<v Speaker 2>That's why I can't watch porn because I don't like

0:27:50.000 --> 0:27:53.960
<v Speaker 2>bad acting. Again, he's like, play with masculinity. I love football,

0:27:54.000 --> 0:27:56.439
<v Speaker 2>I don't like porn. I'm a little bit sad.

0:27:56.880 --> 0:27:59.280
<v Speaker 1>But don't get me wrong. I like cheese.

0:28:00.200 --> 0:28:01.560
<v Speaker 3>I drink that, I eat cheese.

0:28:01.680 --> 0:28:02.639
<v Speaker 1>Yeah exactly.

0:28:03.080 --> 0:28:05.280
<v Speaker 2>We're all just playing and we're all just extras in

0:28:05.320 --> 0:28:06.720
<v Speaker 2>Brad Pitt's world at this point.

0:28:08.600 --> 0:28:13.159
<v Speaker 1>After the break, another fucking woman, If you have a

0:28:13.200 --> 0:28:16.240
<v Speaker 1>baby and you also want to go to an Olivia

0:28:16.359 --> 0:28:19.399
<v Speaker 1>Dean concert. I want to go to an OLIVI I

0:28:19.440 --> 0:28:22.120
<v Speaker 1>have some news for you. Your baby better have a job.

0:28:24.600 --> 0:28:28.040
<v Speaker 1>Bethany Williams bought a ticket to an Olivia Dean concert

0:28:28.320 --> 0:28:30.800
<v Speaker 1>and here in Sydney. Here in Sydney, and at the

0:28:30.800 --> 0:28:33.919
<v Speaker 1>time she was pregnant with her son. When the concert

0:28:33.960 --> 0:28:36.440
<v Speaker 1>rolled around, she had then given birth to said son.

0:28:36.680 --> 0:28:38.320
<v Speaker 1>It hasn't rolled around yet. It's coming up.

0:28:38.400 --> 0:28:39.000
<v Speaker 3>Oh it hasn't.

0:28:39.120 --> 0:28:41.560
<v Speaker 2>No, No, it's I can still get tickets. Yeah, okay,

0:28:42.000 --> 0:28:44.080
<v Speaker 2>just release some. It's in like I want to say,

0:28:44.080 --> 0:28:46.360
<v Speaker 2>it's in October November. Okay, I have to put that

0:28:46.400 --> 0:28:48.120
<v Speaker 2>on mind to do. But yeah, she's going.

0:28:48.160 --> 0:28:51.959
<v Speaker 1>Okay, she's going. She's going. But she's organized. So she's organized, right,

0:28:52.000 --> 0:28:55.400
<v Speaker 1>So you should have taken the second for logistical reasons.

0:28:55.440 --> 0:28:57.440
<v Speaker 1>She emailed the venue and told them that she'll have

0:28:57.480 --> 0:28:59.560
<v Speaker 1>a baby with her and she wanted to know if

0:28:59.560 --> 0:29:02.600
<v Speaker 1>the prayer and nappy bag will make it through security. Okay.

0:29:02.960 --> 0:29:06.360
<v Speaker 1>The Venus response, thank you for your inquiry. For the

0:29:06.400 --> 0:29:09.640
<v Speaker 1>Olivia Dean event, all patrons must hold a valid ticket

0:29:09.640 --> 0:29:15.640
<v Speaker 1>for entry, regardless of age. William's right, I hadn't even

0:29:15.680 --> 0:29:17.959
<v Speaker 1>thought to ask if my baby would be allowed in

0:29:18.200 --> 0:29:21.120
<v Speaker 1>because well, he's a baby. He'll be less than five

0:29:21.120 --> 0:29:23.320
<v Speaker 1>months old on the day of the concert. Our tickets

0:29:23.320 --> 0:29:25.240
<v Speaker 1>are seated, and he'll be strapped to my body the

0:29:25.240 --> 0:29:28.000
<v Speaker 1>whole time because he can't sit because he's a baby.

0:29:29.760 --> 0:29:31.920
<v Speaker 1>Do we think this baby should be paying for his

0:29:31.960 --> 0:29:33.600
<v Speaker 1>own way into Olivia Dean's concert.

0:29:33.640 --> 0:29:36.600
<v Speaker 3>I think if you can't sit, you probably don't need

0:29:36.640 --> 0:29:38.200
<v Speaker 3>to buy a ticket. How about that.

0:29:38.360 --> 0:29:41.240
<v Speaker 2>I think that a ticket is for a seat. Baby

0:29:41.240 --> 0:29:43.560
<v Speaker 2>doesn't need a seat, so you know, I don't think

0:29:43.600 --> 0:29:45.800
<v Speaker 2>the baby should have to pay. But I read the

0:29:45.840 --> 0:29:46.640
<v Speaker 2>comments section.

0:29:46.840 --> 0:29:48.400
<v Speaker 1>Can I ask the question that I feel like I'll

0:29:48.400 --> 0:29:48.960
<v Speaker 1>get in trouble?

0:29:49.000 --> 0:29:51.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeh, yeah, no do Why would you bring a baby

0:29:51.320 --> 0:29:54.800
<v Speaker 2>to a concert? So that's what the comment section said, right.

0:29:55.520 --> 0:29:58.240
<v Speaker 2>This is interesting because I think, you know, the writer

0:29:58.320 --> 0:30:01.120
<v Speaker 2>of this piece was making one point, which is like,

0:30:01.200 --> 0:30:04.000
<v Speaker 2>this is ridiculous to charge my baby to get into

0:30:04.000 --> 0:30:07.640
<v Speaker 2>a concert, and the comment section was just all like,

0:30:08.200 --> 0:30:09.880
<v Speaker 2>why are you taking her baby to a cart?

0:30:10.080 --> 0:30:12.680
<v Speaker 3>And look her answer she preempts this in the article.

0:30:12.760 --> 0:30:15.320
<v Speaker 3>This is what her answer is, which is that she's

0:30:15.360 --> 0:30:19.040
<v Speaker 3>breastfeeding and she lives on the Central Coast and so

0:30:19.160 --> 0:30:21.680
<v Speaker 3>to come down to the concert and then back again.

0:30:22.240 --> 0:30:25.400
<v Speaker 3>It's going to be a seven and a half hour odyssey,

0:30:26.320 --> 0:30:29.960
<v Speaker 3>so to speak, and so she can't stay away from

0:30:29.960 --> 0:30:32.800
<v Speaker 3>the baby for that long. But then your follow up

0:30:32.880 --> 0:30:34.920
<v Speaker 3>is probably like does she need to go to the

0:30:34.920 --> 0:30:37.800
<v Speaker 3>Olivia Dean concert? And you know, I think it's a

0:30:37.840 --> 0:30:38.520
<v Speaker 3>fair question.

0:30:38.720 --> 0:30:40.960
<v Speaker 2>I think she definitely needs to go to the Olivia

0:30:41.000 --> 0:30:43.920
<v Speaker 2>Dean concert. Like when is the Olivia Dean concert coming

0:30:43.960 --> 0:30:47.320
<v Speaker 2>around again? When is Olivia having this moment? When does

0:30:47.360 --> 0:30:50.120
<v Speaker 2>she have the energy to come to Australia. She's very

0:30:50.160 --> 0:30:50.760
<v Speaker 2>famous now.

0:30:50.800 --> 0:30:52.720
<v Speaker 1>I guess I just feel again.

0:30:52.640 --> 0:30:55.000
<v Speaker 3>You know, as someone who did breastfeed. So I'm not

0:30:55.040 --> 0:30:58.840
<v Speaker 3>hating on breastfeeding, of course I'm not. But it's a

0:30:58.880 --> 0:31:01.680
<v Speaker 3>tricky time. It's hard to go to the shops when

0:31:01.720 --> 0:31:06.120
<v Speaker 3>you're breastfeeding. It's making life difficult. I'm just gonna say,

0:31:06.360 --> 0:31:08.080
<v Speaker 3>her call. It is her call.

0:31:08.200 --> 0:31:09.920
<v Speaker 1>And like lots of people are saying, what about the

0:31:09.920 --> 0:31:10.440
<v Speaker 1>baby's ears?

0:31:10.440 --> 0:31:13.000
<v Speaker 2>And she can get those headphones. We've all seen famous

0:31:13.000 --> 0:31:15.920
<v Speaker 2>people's babies next to the text to the stage at

0:31:15.920 --> 0:31:19.840
<v Speaker 2>concerts with headphones. This is just people being like, you're

0:31:19.880 --> 0:31:21.600
<v Speaker 2>a mum now, And a lot of the comments actually

0:31:21.600 --> 0:31:25.280
<v Speaker 2>say this, Your pleasure is not important, and I'm like,

0:31:25.800 --> 0:31:26.400
<v Speaker 2>but who.

0:31:26.240 --> 0:31:27.240
<v Speaker 1>Doesn't want to see man?

0:31:27.320 --> 0:31:27.680
<v Speaker 2>I need?

0:31:27.800 --> 0:31:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's life.

0:31:29.320 --> 0:31:31.400
<v Speaker 3>I guess what I was sort of saying is I'm

0:31:31.440 --> 0:31:33.520
<v Speaker 3>not sure I would want to go to the concert

0:31:33.520 --> 0:31:36.840
<v Speaker 3>while breastfeeding. But you're right, that's that's her prerogative to go.

0:31:37.320 --> 0:31:40.160
<v Speaker 1>But I think that the charging for a ticket is bullshit.

0:31:40.400 --> 0:31:42.360
<v Speaker 1>You're just gonna SAT's fair. I just don't think the

0:31:42.360 --> 0:31:44.720
<v Speaker 1>baby would really appreciate Olivia Dean.

0:31:44.800 --> 0:31:45.600
<v Speaker 3>She's got a great pace.

0:31:45.880 --> 0:31:47.160
<v Speaker 1>Will he know all the lyrics?

0:31:47.320 --> 0:31:50.440
<v Speaker 2>I'm not sure, But imagine when he's older and she's like,

0:31:50.560 --> 0:31:53.600
<v Speaker 2>your first concert was Olivia Dean. When you're pretty five

0:31:53.600 --> 0:31:56.000
<v Speaker 2>months old, that is pretty cool. And Olivia Dean by

0:31:56.040 --> 0:31:57.920
<v Speaker 2>then I'll be doing the Bond theme song. In fact,

0:31:57.960 --> 0:31:58.800
<v Speaker 2>she probably already is.

0:31:59.240 --> 0:32:01.880
<v Speaker 3>And he'll be like, I've seen her and after a

0:32:01.880 --> 0:32:05.000
<v Speaker 3>lot of people wearing nappies at concerts these days, anyway,

0:32:05.280 --> 0:32:06.000
<v Speaker 3>So we're good.

0:32:06.280 --> 0:32:08.560
<v Speaker 2>Really, you've nailed it. All the people in the front

0:32:08.640 --> 0:32:11.600
<v Speaker 2>row wearing nappies. If they're allowed to earn nappies, baby's

0:32:11.640 --> 0:32:12.640
<v Speaker 2>allowed to wear nappies.

0:32:12.680 --> 0:32:15.040
<v Speaker 3>It's fine, you know. The big message from this is

0:32:15.920 --> 0:32:19.720
<v Speaker 3>ask forgiveness, not seek for mission. Yes, just show up.

0:32:20.840 --> 0:32:23.240
<v Speaker 1>Imagine if they're there and they're just like, sorry, baby,

0:32:24.600 --> 0:32:25.760
<v Speaker 1>she has to stay out here.

0:32:27.200 --> 0:32:29.400
<v Speaker 2>I want to test an idea that I read in

0:32:29.440 --> 0:32:31.960
<v Speaker 2>a substack that I subscribe to, and I find it

0:32:32.080 --> 0:32:36.760
<v Speaker 2>simultaneously awful and also fundamentally true. So I need to

0:32:36.800 --> 0:32:40.520
<v Speaker 2>run it past you my moral compasses, right. Polly Vernon

0:32:40.560 --> 0:32:42.600
<v Speaker 2>is a British writer. She's a journo. She's got loads

0:32:42.600 --> 0:32:46.480
<v Speaker 2>of experience. She's very funny, very smart. She is a columnist.

0:32:46.560 --> 0:32:48.640
<v Speaker 2>She's been a columnist for years, but now these days

0:32:48.680 --> 0:32:49.600
<v Speaker 2>she's a substacker.

0:32:49.640 --> 0:32:50.240
<v Speaker 1>Of course she is.

0:32:50.280 --> 0:32:53.360
<v Speaker 2>And she writes a lot about femininity, body image, beauty stuff.

0:32:53.680 --> 0:32:55.840
<v Speaker 1>She loves to poke the bear. She writes a lot

0:32:55.880 --> 0:32:56.400
<v Speaker 1>of comments.

0:32:56.400 --> 0:33:00.640
<v Speaker 2>She writes a lot of stories about you know, cosmetic

0:33:00.680 --> 0:33:04.120
<v Speaker 2>procedures and diet and things that she doesn't shy away from.

0:33:04.120 --> 0:33:07.480
<v Speaker 2>An unpopular opinion. She loves an unpopular opinion. And this

0:33:07.560 --> 0:33:11.360
<v Speaker 2>one is very interesting. I think this newsletter was called

0:33:11.440 --> 0:33:14.040
<v Speaker 2>are you a victim of the fourth Prettiest Girl in

0:33:14.080 --> 0:33:18.080
<v Speaker 2>the Playground syndrome? I know you're already a bit irritated

0:33:18.080 --> 0:33:20.280
<v Speaker 2>by that title. Nd yeah, everybody is bear with me.

0:33:21.160 --> 0:33:25.640
<v Speaker 2>She writes about how often it's women rounding on, like

0:33:25.840 --> 0:33:29.280
<v Speaker 2>a new woman who enters any arena. Now, obstensibly here

0:33:29.320 --> 0:33:32.040
<v Speaker 2>she's writing about the public arena, so like a new

0:33:32.080 --> 0:33:35.120
<v Speaker 2>woman who comes into the public consciousness. But also think

0:33:35.120 --> 0:33:38.320
<v Speaker 2>about this in terms of your workplace, your friend group,

0:33:38.720 --> 0:33:40.840
<v Speaker 2>your gym, the school yard.

0:33:40.760 --> 0:33:43.080
<v Speaker 1>Your favorite podcast, your favorite podcast.

0:33:43.640 --> 0:33:45.960
<v Speaker 2>The example she was using specifically, I'm not going to

0:33:46.000 --> 0:33:47.800
<v Speaker 2>go too far into because it's weedy, but it was

0:33:47.840 --> 0:33:51.120
<v Speaker 2>about the reaction to the British Prime Minister, the new

0:33:51.120 --> 0:33:54.600
<v Speaker 2>British Prime Minister, Andy Burnham. His wife has always been

0:33:54.680 --> 0:33:56.560
<v Speaker 2>like in the background, no one really knew much about it.

0:33:56.600 --> 0:33:59.080
<v Speaker 2>But obviously now he's Prime Minister, she's sort of stepped

0:33:59.600 --> 0:34:02.120
<v Speaker 2>into the spotlight a bit. She's called Mary France heel.

0:34:02.520 --> 0:34:04.720
<v Speaker 2>No one had really seen her, but suddenly everyone had

0:34:04.720 --> 0:34:07.440
<v Speaker 2>an opinion about her first appearance, about her dress.

0:34:07.480 --> 0:34:09.520
<v Speaker 3>It wasn't it like a lovely Victoria Beckham.

0:34:09.560 --> 0:34:12.319
<v Speaker 2>She wore a lilac Victoria Beckham dress. But plenty of

0:34:12.400 --> 0:34:14.200
<v Speaker 2>annoying people were like, oh, it.

0:34:14.080 --> 0:34:16.520
<v Speaker 1>Doesn't know favors. Oh she's got a stump, like all

0:34:16.520 --> 0:34:17.440
<v Speaker 1>that kind of nonsense.

0:34:17.520 --> 0:34:21.040
<v Speaker 2>Right, suddenly it's lots of thoughts about her body, her face,

0:34:21.080 --> 0:34:25.080
<v Speaker 2>her expression, etc. Vernon writes, I believe this is It's

0:34:25.120 --> 0:34:27.920
<v Speaker 2>the thing that happens every time a brand new woman

0:34:28.000 --> 0:34:32.120
<v Speaker 2>is suddenly dramatically introduced to proceedings of whom we haven't

0:34:32.120 --> 0:34:35.160
<v Speaker 2>previously been aware, When they just kind of land on us,

0:34:35.200 --> 0:34:36.360
<v Speaker 2>as if from out of space.

0:34:36.760 --> 0:34:37.839
<v Speaker 1>It's as if we all go.

0:34:38.000 --> 0:34:42.960
<v Speaker 2>Fucking great, just what we need, another fucking woman, As

0:34:43.000 --> 0:34:44.399
<v Speaker 2>if we haven't got enough on.

0:34:44.360 --> 0:34:47.239
<v Speaker 1>Our plates already trying to feel okay about all the

0:34:47.239 --> 0:34:49.160
<v Speaker 1>ones we already knew about.

0:34:49.520 --> 0:34:52.680
<v Speaker 2>I think of it, Polly writes, as but I'm the

0:34:52.760 --> 0:34:57.120
<v Speaker 2>fourth prettiest girl in the playground syndrome. Sudden consciousness to

0:34:57.200 --> 0:35:00.800
<v Speaker 2>another fucking woman necessitates a shake up in the existing

0:35:00.840 --> 0:35:04.000
<v Speaker 2>great hierarchy of women, the one that obviously doesn't really

0:35:04.040 --> 0:35:07.560
<v Speaker 2>exist anywhere but in the darkest, least admirable, least feminist

0:35:07.560 --> 0:35:11.200
<v Speaker 2>reaches of our collective imaginations, but which is all the same,

0:35:11.360 --> 0:35:17.320
<v Speaker 2>unfortunately undeniably definitely there another fucking woman. As she calls it,

0:35:17.360 --> 0:35:20.279
<v Speaker 2>can be terribly confronting, can't she She can send us

0:35:20.320 --> 0:35:23.399
<v Speaker 2>into a frantic questioning of our own really shakable sense

0:35:23.440 --> 0:35:26.840
<v Speaker 2>of status aka our prettiness in the playground rating, Because

0:35:26.920 --> 0:35:31.000
<v Speaker 2>has she, by dint of just you know, arriving, displaced us.

0:35:31.320 --> 0:35:35.000
<v Speaker 2>Has she knocked us down to the fifth prettiest woman

0:35:35.320 --> 0:35:38.640
<v Speaker 2>in the playground? She says, we go straight into attack mode,

0:35:39.360 --> 0:35:42.600
<v Speaker 2>attempt to dismantle the threat she poses to our deepest

0:35:42.680 --> 0:35:45.600
<v Speaker 2>sense of ourselves. Oh my god, she's sow this. She's

0:35:45.640 --> 0:35:49.120
<v Speaker 2>so that she really fancies herself even though she definitely shouldn't.

0:35:49.280 --> 0:35:51.319
<v Speaker 2>What's she wearing? Why does she laugh like that? A

0:35:51.320 --> 0:35:53.600
<v Speaker 2>bit of botox wouldn't go a mislove? Oh my god,

0:35:53.640 --> 0:35:56.880
<v Speaker 2>have you seen how much work she's got done? Now

0:35:57.080 --> 0:35:59.760
<v Speaker 2>we could all agree that this is ugly, ugly sentiment,

0:36:00.520 --> 0:36:05.040
<v Speaker 2>the absolute opposite of the women supporting women trope. It's

0:36:05.080 --> 0:36:07.640
<v Speaker 2>the scarcity mindset. There's not enough cake matt to go

0:36:07.680 --> 0:36:09.960
<v Speaker 2>around and all that. But also it's true if you

0:36:10.080 --> 0:36:12.839
<v Speaker 2>look in the comments section of our friend, we are

0:36:12.880 --> 0:36:14.440
<v Speaker 2>just talking about who wants to take a baby to

0:36:14.480 --> 0:36:17.080
<v Speaker 2>a concert? Or let's say Anne Hathaway this week is

0:36:17.080 --> 0:36:19.840
<v Speaker 2>a good example. Steps she's not new, but her body

0:36:19.920 --> 0:36:24.920
<v Speaker 2>is new in this context, steps out with her baby bump, flaunted.

0:36:24.880 --> 0:36:30.120
<v Speaker 3>Flaunty step out and flaunt, stepping out where are her

0:36:30.239 --> 0:36:30.880
<v Speaker 3>pins in all this?

0:36:31.080 --> 0:36:31.560
<v Speaker 1>Exactly?

0:36:32.000 --> 0:36:37.640
<v Speaker 2>The comments roundly critical comments are overwhelmingly from women.

0:36:37.800 --> 0:36:38.560
<v Speaker 1>This is the truth.

0:36:38.719 --> 0:36:41.560
<v Speaker 2>We don't or from Russian bots that have pretending to

0:36:41.600 --> 0:36:43.680
<v Speaker 2>be women. That's that's a fair point, Amelia, that's a

0:36:43.680 --> 0:36:49.200
<v Speaker 2>fair point. So does this theory, the fourth prettiest girl

0:36:49.239 --> 0:36:53.400
<v Speaker 2>in the playground theory explain why that?

0:36:53.520 --> 0:36:58.479
<v Speaker 1>Vitriol? Emily Vernon. When I read this story, I got

0:36:58.520 --> 0:37:03.279
<v Speaker 1>this distinct men, Mari immediately from a time that I've

0:37:03.360 --> 0:37:05.560
<v Speaker 1>like completely forgot about. I didn't know I had this

0:37:05.680 --> 0:37:10.120
<v Speaker 1>memory inside me. And it was year eight. My year

0:37:10.160 --> 0:37:13.400
<v Speaker 1>eight cohort was broken up into different classes and we

0:37:13.440 --> 0:37:16.040
<v Speaker 1>all did like the same glasses together in this like

0:37:16.160 --> 0:37:20.600
<v Speaker 1>smaller group. And in my group it was like majority boys,

0:37:20.640 --> 0:37:22.040
<v Speaker 1>and I think there was only five of us who

0:37:22.040 --> 0:37:24.120
<v Speaker 1>were girls. So we did the whole of year seven

0:37:24.200 --> 0:37:26.160
<v Speaker 1>like that, the half of year eight like that. And

0:37:26.200 --> 0:37:28.280
<v Speaker 1>then we got a new student and it was a girl,

0:37:28.480 --> 0:37:30.719
<v Speaker 1>and I immediately hated her. And I don't know why

0:37:30.760 --> 0:37:31.239
<v Speaker 1>I hated her.

0:37:31.280 --> 0:37:32.120
<v Speaker 2>I just hated her.

0:37:32.719 --> 0:37:36.080
<v Speaker 1>Throughout all of high school. And another fucking woman, another

0:37:36.080 --> 0:37:38.239
<v Speaker 1>fucking woman, and I wish I could say. And then

0:37:38.280 --> 0:37:40.000
<v Speaker 1>I grew up and was like, actually, she's a really

0:37:40.040 --> 0:37:42.160
<v Speaker 1>nice person, but I still hate her. And I don't

0:37:42.160 --> 0:37:43.839
<v Speaker 1>know why. I don't know why. I don't know who

0:37:43.880 --> 0:37:45.719
<v Speaker 1>she is. I can't even remember her name. I just

0:37:45.840 --> 0:37:50.279
<v Speaker 1>know I have this distace for her and coming into

0:37:50.360 --> 0:37:51.120
<v Speaker 1>my classroom.

0:37:51.280 --> 0:37:55.920
<v Speaker 3>There's a great Australian classic children's book about precisely this phenomenon,

0:37:55.960 --> 0:38:00.600
<v Speaker 3>called Hating Alison Alshell. Yes, my God, Delta, goodroom. Yes,

0:38:00.960 --> 0:38:04.360
<v Speaker 3>the movie is Delta. The book is written by Robin Klein,

0:38:04.680 --> 0:38:09.280
<v Speaker 3>and it just so perfectly encapsulates that hierarchy that Pollie

0:38:09.320 --> 0:38:12.640
<v Speaker 3>is talking about that only seems to exist in the

0:38:12.680 --> 0:38:15.920
<v Speaker 3>heads of girls and women. Why is that, holly.

0:38:16.760 --> 0:38:21.480
<v Speaker 2>Well, the generous read is, it's scarcity mindset.

0:38:21.560 --> 0:38:23.000
<v Speaker 1>It's the patriarchy.

0:38:23.120 --> 0:38:25.000
<v Speaker 2>You know, who are kind of going, well, we will

0:38:25.080 --> 0:38:27.360
<v Speaker 2>let some of the women have some of the things,

0:38:27.680 --> 0:38:32.759
<v Speaker 2>but only the prettiest, smartest, most pleasing, loveliest, nicest of

0:38:32.800 --> 0:38:35.840
<v Speaker 2>you this very small pool. We demand a certain amount

0:38:35.880 --> 0:38:38.279
<v Speaker 2>of behave a certain kind of behavior from you. We

0:38:38.320 --> 0:38:40.040
<v Speaker 2>want you to look a certain way, behave a certain way.

0:38:40.080 --> 0:38:40.879
<v Speaker 1>So there's the.

0:38:40.880 --> 0:38:43.319
<v Speaker 2>Doors are closed and open just a crack, and some

0:38:43.360 --> 0:38:47.520
<v Speaker 2>of us might squeeze through it. Right, That is one explanation,

0:38:47.640 --> 0:38:51.640
<v Speaker 2>so that women are always feeling in a constant state

0:38:51.920 --> 0:38:56.279
<v Speaker 2>of competition with each other for to be able to

0:38:56.280 --> 0:38:58.080
<v Speaker 2>get through that crack in the door. And that might

0:38:58.120 --> 0:39:00.520
<v Speaker 2>be professional, but it also might be romantic. It might

0:39:00.560 --> 0:39:03.759
<v Speaker 2>be all kinds of different, you know, different things. So

0:39:03.840 --> 0:39:08.719
<v Speaker 2>that's a generous read. I also think that because one

0:39:08.800 --> 0:39:10.440
<v Speaker 2>of the things that I often think about this is

0:39:10.480 --> 0:39:13.160
<v Speaker 2>why is this apparently seemed to be getting worse rather

0:39:13.239 --> 0:39:16.000
<v Speaker 2>than better in terms of the public discourse we have

0:39:16.080 --> 0:39:19.839
<v Speaker 2>around women, because I would love we know that women

0:39:19.880 --> 0:39:22.240
<v Speaker 2>in the public eye get an enormous amount of toxic

0:39:22.920 --> 0:39:25.520
<v Speaker 2>trolling from men. We know that's true, and it's often

0:39:25.640 --> 0:39:30.600
<v Speaker 2>violent and very disturbing, but it is undeniably true that

0:39:30.640 --> 0:39:33.800
<v Speaker 2>women are incredibly harsh on each other in comments section.

0:39:34.000 --> 0:39:35.280
<v Speaker 3>And you think that's getting worse.

0:39:35.480 --> 0:39:38.040
<v Speaker 2>I think it's getting worse because I think that social

0:39:38.080 --> 0:39:41.440
<v Speaker 2>media and even when I say that, I want to

0:39:41.480 --> 0:39:44.000
<v Speaker 2>kind of hit myself in the face, because saying social

0:39:44.040 --> 0:39:46.400
<v Speaker 2>media now is like saying phones or whatever. It's just

0:39:47.080 --> 0:39:51.360
<v Speaker 2>the culture that we live in is more hyper vigilant.

0:39:52.080 --> 0:39:56.120
<v Speaker 2>We have more constant comparison. I saw a TikTok this

0:39:56.200 --> 0:39:58.919
<v Speaker 2>week from an Australian trad wife who I follow because

0:39:58.960 --> 0:40:01.239
<v Speaker 2>you know, I love my trad wife, and she was

0:40:01.280 --> 0:40:02.839
<v Speaker 2>saying that she.

0:40:03.000 --> 0:40:05.360
<v Speaker 3>Envies her wouldn't have been any sense as conflict in

0:40:05.360 --> 0:40:06.239
<v Speaker 3>a child wife house.

0:40:06.360 --> 0:40:08.320
<v Speaker 2>I just realized that they would have been able to

0:40:08.400 --> 0:40:12.360
<v Speaker 2>go non one hundred percent. She was saying that she

0:40:12.600 --> 0:40:16.840
<v Speaker 2>envied her mother's generation of parents because they had no

0:40:17.120 --> 0:40:19.719
<v Speaker 2>visibility on what everybody else was doing, so you didn't

0:40:19.719 --> 0:40:21.200
<v Speaker 2>feel so shitty about what you were doing.

0:40:21.040 --> 0:40:21.600
<v Speaker 1>All the time.

0:40:22.120 --> 0:40:25.520
<v Speaker 2>And that's true and undeniable. And we're talking about this

0:40:25.560 --> 0:40:27.359
<v Speaker 2>in terms of mental healthy young girls and all these

0:40:27.360 --> 0:40:31.200
<v Speaker 2>things that the constant comparison and windows into everyone else's

0:40:31.200 --> 0:40:35.520
<v Speaker 2>world is actually making us more anxious and competitive than not.

0:40:36.200 --> 0:40:38.360
<v Speaker 2>So I do believe this is one of those areas

0:40:38.360 --> 0:40:41.399
<v Speaker 2>that it's getting worse, not better, And the problem is

0:40:41.400 --> 0:40:44.560
<v Speaker 2>is the pushback to it. And I genuinely try and

0:40:44.600 --> 0:40:49.600
<v Speaker 2>practice this is to switch your that programming, like when

0:40:49.600 --> 0:40:52.800
<v Speaker 2>you do see another fucking woman, when you see Mary

0:40:52.840 --> 0:40:55.799
<v Speaker 2>Franz stepping out, is to not be like Tommy in

0:40:55.800 --> 0:40:58.000
<v Speaker 2>that dress or like you know, any woman on the

0:40:58.040 --> 0:40:59.960
<v Speaker 2>TV will tell you that all the feedback she gets

0:41:00.080 --> 0:41:02.200
<v Speaker 2>ninety five percent the feedback she'll get will be about

0:41:02.200 --> 0:41:05.359
<v Speaker 2>her appearance, and a lot of that is from other

0:41:05.400 --> 0:41:09.560
<v Speaker 2>women too, but it's all about do are you good enough?

0:41:10.719 --> 0:41:13.600
<v Speaker 1>Are you better than me? I think it's getting worse,

0:41:13.680 --> 0:41:14.040
<v Speaker 1>not better.

0:41:14.120 --> 0:41:16.600
<v Speaker 3>I think that's such an interesting observation, that it's getting worse,

0:41:16.719 --> 0:41:19.120
<v Speaker 3>and it makes me wonder if it's also tied to

0:41:19.239 --> 0:41:23.800
<v Speaker 3>how we feel a sense of economic precarity in this moment.

0:41:24.400 --> 0:41:28.359
<v Speaker 3>I've been thinking a lot lately about how we know

0:41:28.480 --> 0:41:32.799
<v Speaker 3>that when times get tough economically, women's bodies in the

0:41:32.840 --> 0:41:36.120
<v Speaker 3>public eye shrink, and we don't know why that is.

0:41:36.160 --> 0:41:38.200
<v Speaker 3>And it's not that individual women look at the stock

0:41:38.239 --> 0:41:41.080
<v Speaker 3>market and decide that they're going to get smaller, but

0:41:41.160 --> 0:41:45.080
<v Speaker 3>it's just a phenomenon that when times are tough economically,

0:41:45.600 --> 0:41:48.880
<v Speaker 3>women in the public eye are smaller. And I wonder

0:41:48.920 --> 0:41:51.720
<v Speaker 3>if there's also a sense that the competition between women

0:41:51.760 --> 0:41:54.680
<v Speaker 3>gets amped up when we're worried about getting our slice

0:41:54.719 --> 0:41:56.759
<v Speaker 3>of the pie and when we're worried about making sure

0:41:56.760 --> 0:41:58.520
<v Speaker 3>that we can set up our retirements and that we

0:41:58.600 --> 0:42:01.160
<v Speaker 3>have enough money in the bank, and we're feeling that

0:42:01.239 --> 0:42:03.359
<v Speaker 3>sense of anxiety economically, and now.

0:42:03.280 --> 0:42:06.839
<v Speaker 1>The really pretty perfect AI robot women are coming.

0:42:07.200 --> 0:42:11.520
<v Speaker 2>For our slices of the pie too, So you're right,

0:42:11.719 --> 0:42:14.480
<v Speaker 2>is it feels like a ramping up of competition at

0:42:14.520 --> 0:42:18.960
<v Speaker 2>all times? How do we fix fourth prettiest girl in

0:42:19.000 --> 0:42:23.920
<v Speaker 2>the playground syndrome? Because I think that the reason that

0:42:23.960 --> 0:42:26.120
<v Speaker 2>this idea rankles is because it's awful.

0:42:26.160 --> 0:42:27.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to admit it.

0:42:27.120 --> 0:42:29.799
<v Speaker 2>I hate the tropes that women are all competitive, that

0:42:29.840 --> 0:42:32.640
<v Speaker 2>they can't work together, and lots of experiences in my life,

0:42:32.680 --> 0:42:34.960
<v Speaker 2>certainly my professional life, prove that not to be true

0:42:34.960 --> 0:42:37.880
<v Speaker 2>all the time. But the reason it's an interesting syndrome

0:42:37.960 --> 0:42:40.840
<v Speaker 2>is because it does have a kernel of truth in it.

0:42:40.920 --> 0:42:44.360
<v Speaker 1>How do we undo it? How do you unpick that attitude?

0:42:44.640 --> 0:42:48.440
<v Speaker 1>I think first we all agree we hate Brad Pitt,

0:42:48.480 --> 0:42:52.560
<v Speaker 1>and then I like to be a bit more optimistic.

0:42:52.600 --> 0:42:55.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't necessarily think it is getting worse. I don't

0:42:55.040 --> 0:42:57.680
<v Speaker 1>know if it's getting better, but I think we always

0:42:57.960 --> 0:43:01.320
<v Speaker 1>roll our eyes at our eyes at the girl Boss

0:43:01.480 --> 0:43:04.160
<v Speaker 1>and the women supporting women. But I think we have

0:43:04.360 --> 0:43:07.600
<v Speaker 1>those things because inherently we have to be very overt

0:43:07.719 --> 0:43:10.439
<v Speaker 1>in telling ourselves. I'm a woman, I know how hard

0:43:10.440 --> 0:43:12.080
<v Speaker 1>it was for me to get here. I need to

0:43:12.120 --> 0:43:15.040
<v Speaker 1>do this for other women because we don't subconsciously do it.

0:43:15.239 --> 0:43:17.680
<v Speaker 1>And I think back to your discussion with just into

0:43:17.719 --> 0:43:21.359
<v Speaker 1>our Durnhole, especially about the workplace, and we say, if

0:43:21.400 --> 0:43:24.040
<v Speaker 1>there's like a male dominated space, a woman can come

0:43:24.040 --> 0:43:26.440
<v Speaker 1>in and elbow her way in and get in. But

0:43:26.520 --> 0:43:29.080
<v Speaker 1>if it's a male dominated space with another woman and

0:43:29.120 --> 0:43:31.840
<v Speaker 1>that woman has closed the door behind her and is

0:43:31.880 --> 0:43:35.040
<v Speaker 1>not letting other women in, then you're just not getting in.

0:43:35.120 --> 0:43:37.680
<v Speaker 1>That makes it very very hard. So I think actually

0:43:37.760 --> 0:43:42.360
<v Speaker 1>having these overused generic terms of support other women smash

0:43:42.400 --> 0:43:46.040
<v Speaker 1>the glass ceiling, like be that person for other women

0:43:46.120 --> 0:43:48.600
<v Speaker 1>to look up to, be a role model, be a

0:43:48.640 --> 0:43:51.960
<v Speaker 1>girl boss. I think it actually makes us believe that

0:43:52.040 --> 0:43:54.719
<v Speaker 1>we are what we say, and it actually puts that

0:43:54.800 --> 0:43:57.680
<v Speaker 1>in front of our mind instead of a subconscious churning

0:43:57.719 --> 0:43:58.040
<v Speaker 1>of it.

0:43:58.080 --> 0:44:01.719
<v Speaker 2>Do you think we also have to And this is

0:44:01.840 --> 0:44:04.040
<v Speaker 2>very basic therapy speak, but it's like, you've got to

0:44:04.040 --> 0:44:06.560
<v Speaker 2>recognize your problem before you can fix your problem. Right,

0:44:06.600 --> 0:44:10.239
<v Speaker 2>So when you do, when another fucking woman does enter

0:44:10.280 --> 0:44:13.160
<v Speaker 2>your world in whatever world that is the gym, the workplace,

0:44:13.960 --> 0:44:18.680
<v Speaker 2>your phone, like talking yourself out of that, you know

0:44:18.719 --> 0:44:21.839
<v Speaker 2>what I mean, like literally talking You're questioning why your

0:44:21.840 --> 0:44:28.040
<v Speaker 2>first reaction is hackles up backplazed, like making being that change.

0:44:27.719 --> 0:44:30.880
<v Speaker 3>When your partner's friend introduces his new girlfriend. Yes, I

0:44:30.880 --> 0:44:33.400
<v Speaker 3>approach it with an open mind and curiosity.

0:44:34.880 --> 0:44:35.640
<v Speaker 1>Is that possible?

0:44:36.400 --> 0:44:38.920
<v Speaker 3>I think it's hard, but I think that naming it

0:44:38.960 --> 0:44:42.799
<v Speaker 3>does help. I was just thinking that. In another workplace

0:44:42.920 --> 0:44:47.600
<v Speaker 3>in which I've worked, I heard some young, younger women

0:44:48.000 --> 0:44:51.279
<v Speaker 3>in the office talking about whether they thought Italy's prime

0:44:51.320 --> 0:44:56.440
<v Speaker 3>minister was attractive. She's a woman's she's the first woman

0:44:56.440 --> 0:45:01.160
<v Speaker 3>prime minister visually, and I did have to say to them,

0:45:01.239 --> 0:45:03.480
<v Speaker 3>I don't think that you should say that at work.

0:45:04.080 --> 0:45:06.359
<v Speaker 3>I deally never, but please don't say it at work

0:45:06.400 --> 0:45:08.720
<v Speaker 3>in front of the men. They might get the wrong idea.

0:45:08.920 --> 0:45:10.680
<v Speaker 3>So I think it's all the more important that we

0:45:10.719 --> 0:45:14.360
<v Speaker 3>police ourselves in mixed environments too, because we've got to

0:45:14.360 --> 0:45:16.680
<v Speaker 3>be the change we want. We want men to see too.

0:45:17.880 --> 0:45:20.279
<v Speaker 2>Another no whatever, says another fucking man, and let's face it,

0:45:20.280 --> 0:45:21.200
<v Speaker 2>there are lots of them.

0:45:21.400 --> 0:45:24.560
<v Speaker 1>Except there was a lot of opinions on Obama's tan suit.

0:45:24.760 --> 0:45:26.760
<v Speaker 1>We do remember that. Note.

0:45:28.200 --> 0:45:31.160
<v Speaker 3>Well, it wasn't his season, it wasn't easy to get

0:45:31.160 --> 0:45:32.280
<v Speaker 3>his colors done.

0:45:33.040 --> 0:45:36.560
<v Speaker 1>Okay, this has been fun. I'm tired.

0:45:36.760 --> 0:45:40.040
<v Speaker 3>Holy that was cathartic. It was kind of fucking woman

0:45:40.160 --> 0:45:42.400
<v Speaker 3>is a real It's a real wake up call.

0:45:42.360 --> 0:45:44.560
<v Speaker 1>I think so. I think it's like I'm going to

0:45:44.840 --> 0:45:47.719
<v Speaker 1>test myself on that. I just know that because now

0:45:47.760 --> 0:45:51.320
<v Speaker 1>we sit next to each other at the death every

0:45:51.400 --> 0:45:53.279
<v Speaker 1>time I'm talking about a woman, You're going to.

0:45:53.280 --> 0:45:55.680
<v Speaker 2>Be like, let's unpack that will And I'll also be like,

0:45:55.760 --> 0:45:57.319
<v Speaker 2>is that just another fucking woman?

0:45:57.400 --> 0:45:59.040
<v Speaker 1>Then I think we should just going to be the

0:45:59.040 --> 0:45:59.560
<v Speaker 1>rest of my life.

0:46:00.040 --> 0:46:00.759
<v Speaker 3>Don't cross the room.

0:46:00.760 --> 0:46:01.640
<v Speaker 1>What did you say?

0:46:03.440 --> 0:46:04.520
<v Speaker 3>Some law.

0:46:06.239 --> 0:46:07.200
<v Speaker 1>Love you out louders.

0:46:07.360 --> 0:46:10.759
<v Speaker 2>We will be back in your ears tomorrow. Until then,

0:46:10.920 --> 0:46:12.759
<v Speaker 2>thanks to our amazing teams. Thank you to you two.

0:46:13.040 --> 0:46:15.920
<v Speaker 1>Oh goodbye, Oh someone just to buy picture a little screenshot.

0:46:17.640 --> 0:46:18.080
<v Speaker 2>Bye bye.

0:46:19.960 --> 0:46:20.200
<v Speaker 1>Mamma.

0:46:20.280 --> 0:46:23.040
<v Speaker 2>Maya acknowledges the traditional owners of the land on which

0:46:23.080 --> 0:46:24.640
<v Speaker 2>we've recorded this podcast.