WEBVTT - The Woman Who Wants To Bring Back Perving

0:00:10.327 --> 0:00:13.047
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to a MoMA Mia podcast.

0:00:13.727 --> 0:00:16.767
<v Speaker 2>Mamma mea acknowledges the traditional owners of land and waters

0:00:16.807 --> 0:00:23.407
<v Speaker 2>that this podcast is recorded on Hello and welcome to

0:00:23.487 --> 0:00:25.927
<v Speaker 2>Mamma Mia out Loud. It's what women are actually talking

0:00:25.927 --> 0:00:27.847
<v Speaker 2>about on Wednesday, the twelfth of June.

0:00:27.927 --> 0:00:30.567
<v Speaker 3>I'm Holly Waynwright, I'm MEA Friedman.

0:00:30.247 --> 0:00:32.647
<v Speaker 4>And I'm m Vernam filling in for Jesse today. You

0:00:32.767 --> 0:00:35.327
<v Speaker 4>might have heard me over on our daily entertainment podcast

0:00:35.327 --> 0:00:36.047
<v Speaker 4>A spill.

0:00:35.927 --> 0:00:39.807
<v Speaker 2>An on today's show. Because Jesse is away and you're here, am,

0:00:40.527 --> 0:00:43.167
<v Speaker 2>I am taking the opportunity to talk about royals.

0:00:43.287 --> 0:00:44.127
<v Speaker 4>You roll us over.

0:00:44.607 --> 0:00:47.727
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to my roundup that includes a wedding, a nasty divorce,

0:00:47.807 --> 0:00:51.607
<v Speaker 2>and a whole new kategait. Also the gray Rock theory

0:00:51.727 --> 0:00:54.327
<v Speaker 2>that might just be the answer for getting through conversations

0:00:54.367 --> 0:00:58.887
<v Speaker 2>with difficult people, and the return of the latsmag But first,

0:00:59.127 --> 0:00:59.807
<v Speaker 2>Mia Friedman.

0:01:00.247 --> 0:01:03.047
<v Speaker 3>In case you missed it, there's a really awful story

0:01:03.167 --> 0:01:07.927
<v Speaker 3>around today about fifty female students from Bacchus Marsh Grammar,

0:01:08.007 --> 0:01:11.007
<v Speaker 3>which is a high school norwest of Melbourne, have reported

0:01:11.207 --> 0:01:14.367
<v Speaker 3>fake nude images of them circulating online that have been

0:01:14.407 --> 0:01:17.527
<v Speaker 3>made with AI. So they're explicit images, but with the

0:01:17.567 --> 0:01:21.887
<v Speaker 3>faces of girls from the school. A teenager has been arrested,

0:01:21.927 --> 0:01:26.087
<v Speaker 3>a teenage boy and since released. After these images of girls,

0:01:26.127 --> 0:01:29.087
<v Speaker 3>who were thought to be in years nine to twelve

0:01:29.967 --> 0:01:34.447
<v Speaker 3>were circulated through the school and presumably outsided as well.

0:01:35.127 --> 0:01:38.407
<v Speaker 3>The principle of the school, Andrew Neil, has released a statement.

0:01:38.567 --> 0:01:40.847
<v Speaker 3>He has said it's appalling. It is something that strikes

0:01:40.887 --> 0:01:43.127
<v Speaker 3>to the heart of students, particularly girls growing.

0:01:42.967 --> 0:01:43.847
<v Speaker 2>Up at this age.

0:01:43.967 --> 0:01:45.487
<v Speaker 3>They should be able to learn and go about their

0:01:45.487 --> 0:01:48.087
<v Speaker 3>business without this kind of nonsense. These things are not funny,

0:01:48.087 --> 0:01:50.847
<v Speaker 3>They are basically vicious and therefore they should be dealt

0:01:50.847 --> 0:01:53.647
<v Speaker 3>with appropriately. It's behavior that needs to be dealt with

0:01:53.687 --> 0:01:55.447
<v Speaker 3>in as firm a way as possible.

0:01:55.687 --> 0:01:55.847
<v Speaker 1>Now.

0:01:55.887 --> 0:02:00.407
<v Speaker 3>Victorian police are continuing to investigate this matter, but I

0:02:00.447 --> 0:02:03.047
<v Speaker 3>think this is just really the start of what we're

0:02:03.047 --> 0:02:06.287
<v Speaker 3>going to see because we've spoken before about celebrities like

0:02:06.327 --> 0:02:09.727
<v Speaker 3>Taylor Swift who have had pornographic images made of her

0:02:10.087 --> 0:02:14.127
<v Speaker 3>a fake using AI. Back in the olden days, I

0:02:14.167 --> 0:02:16.647
<v Speaker 3>had someone when I was a magazine editor who cut

0:02:16.687 --> 0:02:20.087
<v Speaker 3>out images of naked women and photos of my head

0:02:20.847 --> 0:02:23.087
<v Speaker 3>and did it making a bit of a collage and

0:02:23.167 --> 0:02:24.687
<v Speaker 3>sent it to me, which I had to go to

0:02:24.727 --> 0:02:27.567
<v Speaker 3>the police. So I guess terrible people have been doing

0:02:27.567 --> 0:02:30.967
<v Speaker 3>this since the beginning of time, but now it's just

0:02:31.127 --> 0:02:31.807
<v Speaker 3>so easy.

0:02:32.447 --> 0:02:36.727
<v Speaker 4>It's my biggest fear having my nudes leaked, and the

0:02:36.727 --> 0:02:39.567
<v Speaker 4>fact that they can still be leaked even though they're

0:02:39.567 --> 0:02:42.847
<v Speaker 4>not me but looks like me, because these day images

0:02:43.007 --> 0:02:46.567
<v Speaker 4>look so real. That is just beyond And it's these

0:02:46.767 --> 0:02:49.007
<v Speaker 4>young girls, like these are children that it's happening to.

0:02:49.487 --> 0:02:51.527
<v Speaker 2>I think the e Safety Commissioner was talking about it

0:02:51.567 --> 0:02:54.567
<v Speaker 2>today and saying, how this is obviously the beginning of

0:02:54.567 --> 0:02:56.607
<v Speaker 2>this technology, as you've said me, so the law has

0:02:56.647 --> 0:02:59.087
<v Speaker 2>to figure out how to handle it because they're not

0:02:59.567 --> 0:03:02.567
<v Speaker 2>pictures that have been stolen of somebody. They've been entirely created,

0:03:02.607 --> 0:03:05.487
<v Speaker 2>so they're fake. But as she was saying, she's saying,

0:03:05.487 --> 0:03:08.247
<v Speaker 2>this is going to have tragic consequences one day, because

0:03:08.287 --> 0:03:10.927
<v Speaker 2>it will happen to someone who's got such vulnerable mental

0:03:10.927 --> 0:03:12.367
<v Speaker 2>health that it'll go the way that a lot of

0:03:12.367 --> 0:03:16.407
<v Speaker 2>these awful online bullying campaigns go, and we'll lose people,

0:03:16.487 --> 0:03:18.927
<v Speaker 2>and they've got to figure out how to handle it.

0:03:19.047 --> 0:03:21.287
<v Speaker 3>I don't think you can, like, how do you stop

0:03:21.327 --> 0:03:22.607
<v Speaker 3>people from being dickheads.

0:03:22.847 --> 0:03:24.727
<v Speaker 2>One of the ways you can stop children from being

0:03:24.767 --> 0:03:28.647
<v Speaker 2>dickheads is making sure that it is incredibly clear how

0:03:28.687 --> 0:03:32.167
<v Speaker 2>serious it is and what serious consequences there will be,

0:03:32.167 --> 0:03:33.727
<v Speaker 2>because I think if it's a bit of lolls and

0:03:33.807 --> 0:03:35.167
<v Speaker 2>you might just get a slap on the wrist and

0:03:35.167 --> 0:03:37.847
<v Speaker 2>are telling off, that's a completely different ballgame to if

0:03:37.887 --> 0:03:39.327
<v Speaker 2>criminal charges might be brought.

0:03:40.767 --> 0:03:45.767
<v Speaker 4>Tell you how, it's time for Holly's royal roundup now, As.

0:03:45.647 --> 0:03:49.567
<v Speaker 2>I said, So, Jesse's off in Ireland or somewhere somewhere glamorous. Actually,

0:03:49.607 --> 0:03:51.647
<v Speaker 2>I saw her at a castle, so maybe she's changing

0:03:51.687 --> 0:03:54.407
<v Speaker 2>her mind a princess. Yes, maybe she's changing her mind

0:03:54.447 --> 0:03:56.487
<v Speaker 2>about how she feels about royal stories. Anyway, So I

0:03:56.567 --> 0:03:59.047
<v Speaker 2>bribed me or and em in our meeting to let

0:03:59.047 --> 0:04:02.287
<v Speaker 2>me deliver a quick royal roundup. And when Jesse gets back,

0:04:02.327 --> 0:04:04.127
<v Speaker 2>I'm just going to tell her it's a regular now. Yeah,

0:04:04.207 --> 0:04:05.127
<v Speaker 2>that's just the way it rolls.

0:04:05.127 --> 0:04:05.607
<v Speaker 4>I'll back here.

0:04:05.687 --> 0:04:08.527
<v Speaker 2>So three things, are you ready? Yes? Number one? Four

0:04:08.607 --> 0:04:12.527
<v Speaker 2>hundred people watched a very very posh man called Huey

0:04:12.607 --> 0:04:16.127
<v Speaker 2>get married on Saturday. He's the Duke of Westminster and

0:04:16.167 --> 0:04:19.807
<v Speaker 2>he's only thirty three. His calculated wealth is just under

0:04:19.927 --> 0:04:22.567
<v Speaker 2>nine billion pounds, even though he doesn't have a job

0:04:23.047 --> 0:04:26.607
<v Speaker 2>that interesting, isn't Britain great. I'm sure he has a

0:04:26.687 --> 0:04:29.007
<v Speaker 2>job managing all his money, maybe just sitting in one

0:04:29.007 --> 0:04:31.127
<v Speaker 2>of his castles, like piling it up into really neat

0:04:31.167 --> 0:04:34.167
<v Speaker 2>little piles. But anyway, I digress. He married a woman

0:04:34.647 --> 0:04:37.287
<v Speaker 2>called Olivia Henson who did used to have a job.

0:04:37.327 --> 0:04:40.567
<v Speaker 2>She was an account manager and eco importer, but she

0:04:40.727 --> 0:04:42.887
<v Speaker 2>just gave it up to focus on being the Duchess

0:04:42.927 --> 0:04:45.287
<v Speaker 2>of Westminster. Yeah, it's a lot of work, it is,

0:04:45.447 --> 0:04:49.727
<v Speaker 2>so the money doesn't just stack itself anyway. Huey is

0:04:49.887 --> 0:04:53.527
<v Speaker 2>bestie's with both Prince William and Prince Harry. Now he's

0:04:53.607 --> 0:04:55.807
<v Speaker 2>closer to Prince Harry's age, so he might be a

0:04:55.807 --> 0:04:57.847
<v Speaker 2>bit tired of with him. But he is so in

0:04:57.887 --> 0:05:01.007
<v Speaker 2>a circle that he's the godfather to both William's son

0:05:01.047 --> 0:05:04.727
<v Speaker 2>George and Harry's son Archie, and so in a circle

0:05:04.767 --> 0:05:06.927
<v Speaker 2>that Prince William, who is the heir to the throne,

0:05:07.087 --> 0:05:08.927
<v Speaker 2>was just a lowly usher at the wedding.

0:05:09.247 --> 0:05:11.167
<v Speaker 3>There were two things about this wedding that caught my eye.

0:05:11.247 --> 0:05:14.247
<v Speaker 3>One was the hideous shoes that the bride was wearing

0:05:14.687 --> 0:05:18.047
<v Speaker 3>They were blue suede shoes, but they were really like clumpy,

0:05:18.807 --> 0:05:22.647
<v Speaker 3>flatform platform, ugly blue shoes. And as she walked, she

0:05:22.687 --> 0:05:25.167
<v Speaker 3>was wearing a beautiful dress and as she walked you

0:05:25.167 --> 0:05:27.007
<v Speaker 3>could see the ugly shoes. Anyway, I did.

0:05:27.047 --> 0:05:28.567
<v Speaker 4>It was an O to Elvis. You don't know.

0:05:28.967 --> 0:05:30.967
<v Speaker 2>I thought she was trying to be cool. Wrong shoe theory.

0:05:31.207 --> 0:05:34.287
<v Speaker 3>Well, it's the something blue, something borrowed, whatever. But wrong shoe. Oh,

0:05:34.367 --> 0:05:36.767
<v Speaker 3>wrong shoe theory. Yeah, No, I think we need to

0:05:36.847 --> 0:05:39.527
<v Speaker 3>draw a line when it comes to weddings. But I

0:05:39.567 --> 0:05:42.207
<v Speaker 3>also loved this bit about Prince William being in usher.

0:05:42.407 --> 0:05:43.967
<v Speaker 3>Does that when he had to show people to their

0:05:44.007 --> 0:05:45.167
<v Speaker 3>seats and handout programs.

0:05:45.207 --> 0:05:47.007
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and I had to know who they were. He

0:05:47.127 --> 0:05:48.647
<v Speaker 2>had to know who they were. He had a cheat

0:05:48.687 --> 0:05:49.767
<v Speaker 2>sheet and he was like.

0:05:49.727 --> 0:05:52.407
<v Speaker 4>Oh yes, Duke of so and so. I love that.

0:05:52.487 --> 0:05:55.327
<v Speaker 2>Anyway, the reason everybody got excited about this wedding, apart

0:05:55.367 --> 0:05:57.087
<v Speaker 2>from the fact that you know, richest man in Britain

0:05:57.087 --> 0:05:59.127
<v Speaker 2>all the rest of it, an eligible bachelor blah blah

0:05:59.127 --> 0:06:04.567
<v Speaker 2>blah and really hot really yeah ooh, it's because obviously

0:06:04.607 --> 0:06:07.487
<v Speaker 2>Hughie had to pick between Harry and William his two

0:06:07.487 --> 0:06:10.967
<v Speaker 2>besties about which one could and he chose William, which

0:06:11.007 --> 0:06:12.807
<v Speaker 2>maybe you would because he's the heir to the throne

0:06:12.807 --> 0:06:15.767
<v Speaker 2>and Harry has a deal with Netflix, But now you know.

0:06:15.767 --> 0:06:18.087
<v Speaker 3>That he chose. Was Harry actually invited.

0:06:18.207 --> 0:06:22.167
<v Speaker 2>Rumors on the Insiders Royal Insiders say that Harry and

0:06:22.207 --> 0:06:27.007
<v Speaker 2>Meghan were invited but tactfully decided not to come because

0:06:27.087 --> 0:06:29.727
<v Speaker 2>if you believe that side of the story, they didn't

0:06:29.767 --> 0:06:32.727
<v Speaker 2>want to pull focus, particularly from Olivia and her shoes.

0:06:32.847 --> 0:06:36.767
<v Speaker 3>Well, I also think that William had homeground advantage. I mean,

0:06:36.967 --> 0:06:38.767
<v Speaker 3>he was there, and also he's going to be the king,

0:06:38.927 --> 0:06:41.407
<v Speaker 3>so but I think it's important to note that they

0:06:41.447 --> 0:06:44.487
<v Speaker 3>were both invited and that William was the one.

0:06:44.127 --> 0:06:48.327
<v Speaker 2>Who won, because I think we're at the point where

0:06:48.367 --> 0:06:51.887
<v Speaker 2>they cannot be not the same wedding together. They might

0:06:51.967 --> 0:06:54.607
<v Speaker 2>drink too many champagnes, pull off their ties and wrestle

0:06:54.647 --> 0:06:56.127
<v Speaker 2>on the floor, and it has happened before.

0:06:56.167 --> 0:06:59.647
<v Speaker 3>And who's hold is that? It's only one of them

0:06:59.687 --> 0:07:02.727
<v Speaker 3>wrote a book, that's true, exposing all the secrets of

0:07:02.767 --> 0:07:03.127
<v Speaker 3>the other.

0:07:03.367 --> 0:07:08.287
<v Speaker 4>But it's elder boy privilege. The other four, like elder

0:07:08.287 --> 0:07:10.567
<v Speaker 4>siblings always get privileged.

0:07:10.087 --> 0:07:11.687
<v Speaker 3>Like my kids, whoever wasn't a dick.

0:07:12.087 --> 0:07:14.767
<v Speaker 4>No, it's it's the elder sibling. Like at my cousin's wedding,

0:07:14.847 --> 0:07:17.887
<v Speaker 4>she wanted a bridesmaid from each family, and because I'm

0:07:17.927 --> 0:07:20.527
<v Speaker 4>older than my sister, I got chosen from my family.

0:07:20.687 --> 0:07:22.807
<v Speaker 4>So second siblings syndrome. I just have to deal.

0:07:22.927 --> 0:07:24.807
<v Speaker 3>That was at the end of the wedding story.

0:07:24.887 --> 0:07:25.647
<v Speaker 2>That's the end of the wedding.

0:07:25.927 --> 0:07:27.087
<v Speaker 3>She looks a lot like Kate.

0:07:27.167 --> 0:07:28.567
<v Speaker 2>Oh, she looks exactly like Kate.

0:07:28.727 --> 0:07:30.207
<v Speaker 3>I got to Kate's school.

0:07:30.407 --> 0:07:33.247
<v Speaker 2>Everyone's saying she followed a Kate pass because in some

0:07:33.287 --> 0:07:35.087
<v Speaker 2>ways it would be better to marry the Duke of

0:07:35.087 --> 0:07:38.167
<v Speaker 2>Westminster than it would be to marry the Prince of Wales.

0:07:38.527 --> 0:07:42.007
<v Speaker 2>Less scrutiny, you know, more money, all the rest of it.

0:07:42.127 --> 0:07:44.727
<v Speaker 3>You know how the Kardashians are like a certain aesthetic

0:07:45.007 --> 0:07:48.687
<v Speaker 3>among a certain group of women. Is there are the

0:07:48.807 --> 0:07:52.327
<v Speaker 3>same aesthetic among posh English people? Because remember the woman

0:07:52.407 --> 0:07:54.807
<v Speaker 3>that Prince William was rumored to be having an affair with,

0:07:55.047 --> 0:07:59.407
<v Speaker 3>whose name I can't pronounce some things. Ye, she looked

0:07:59.407 --> 0:08:02.047
<v Speaker 3>exactly like Kate too. So it's kind of like a

0:08:02.207 --> 0:08:09.647
<v Speaker 3>very outdoorsy, long, glossy hair, wholesome wholesome. Yes, it's slim, wholesome, very.

0:08:09.527 --> 0:08:13.127
<v Speaker 2>Skinny, very respectable. So yes, she followed the Kate playbooks.

0:08:13.167 --> 0:08:14.767
<v Speaker 2>She went to the same school as Kate. She then

0:08:14.807 --> 0:08:16.967
<v Speaker 2>went to a UNI that isn't like Oxford or Cambridge,

0:08:17.047 --> 0:08:20.207
<v Speaker 2>like an intimidating UNI, but like a good, fancy UNI.

0:08:20.327 --> 0:08:22.687
<v Speaker 2>She went to Trinity in Ireland, which is where Normal

0:08:22.727 --> 0:08:25.767
<v Speaker 2>People was filmed, and everyone was like, who's going to

0:08:25.847 --> 0:08:27.687
<v Speaker 2>marry him? Who's going to marry him? And apparently she

0:08:27.727 --> 0:08:31.167
<v Speaker 2>came from nowhere, Tatler wrote, she flew like a night owl,

0:08:31.287 --> 0:08:34.287
<v Speaker 2>silently into the most coveted bedroom in Britain. She cut

0:08:34.287 --> 0:08:37.007
<v Speaker 2>off as well, she's pushed, but she's not titled. But

0:08:37.127 --> 0:08:38.007
<v Speaker 2>she's from good stock.

0:08:38.087 --> 0:08:38.887
<v Speaker 3>She's not a lady.

0:08:39.247 --> 0:08:42.447
<v Speaker 2>I've certainly just got a serious upgrade, like in terms

0:08:42.447 --> 0:08:43.127
<v Speaker 2>of lifestyle.

0:08:43.167 --> 0:08:45.367
<v Speaker 4>It's like they all learned from Kate's mum, like how

0:08:45.367 --> 0:08:47.247
<v Speaker 4>to be queen, and they're like, how to be Kate.

0:08:47.967 --> 0:08:50.767
<v Speaker 2>So she's been Kate's perhaps better than Kate. Speaking of Kate,

0:08:50.887 --> 0:08:54.367
<v Speaker 2>we have learned nothing. Pulling out my wagging finger. Several

0:08:54.407 --> 0:08:57.527
<v Speaker 2>media organizations, including The Cut and now me, although I'm

0:08:57.527 --> 0:08:59.287
<v Speaker 2>not a very organized organization for.

0:08:59.447 --> 0:09:04.207
<v Speaker 4>Her own organization, wain Wright Organizations.

0:09:04.567 --> 0:09:07.887
<v Speaker 2>I noticed that Kate Watch has been somewhat reinstated since

0:09:07.927 --> 0:09:10.527
<v Speaker 2>it's been three months that we found out that Kate

0:09:10.607 --> 0:09:13.567
<v Speaker 2>was undergoing cancer treatment. And as we know, the internet

0:09:13.607 --> 0:09:16.567
<v Speaker 2>resets its memory after three months and everything that went

0:09:16.647 --> 0:09:19.927
<v Speaker 2>before is wiped and all is new again. She did

0:09:19.967 --> 0:09:21.847
<v Speaker 2>not attend something she was meant to attend. She didn't

0:09:21.847 --> 0:09:23.967
<v Speaker 2>go to the wedding for starters, which is not that surprising,

0:09:23.967 --> 0:09:26.247
<v Speaker 2>and apparently William didn't really go to the party, but

0:09:26.367 --> 0:09:30.247
<v Speaker 2>also something military. She is the honorary colonel of the

0:09:30.287 --> 0:09:31.967
<v Speaker 2>Irish Guards, which is one of the cool things.

0:09:32.327 --> 0:09:34.247
<v Speaker 4>Actual, How you say that word? I was reading it

0:09:34.247 --> 0:09:36.727
<v Speaker 4>in the script and I couldn't figure it out. Colonel.

0:09:38.567 --> 0:09:39.887
<v Speaker 3>You don't know how to say colonel?

0:09:39.927 --> 0:09:41.407
<v Speaker 4>What I do just learn?

0:09:42.047 --> 0:09:44.687
<v Speaker 3>I guess you wouldn't say it. A lot said you

0:09:44.727 --> 0:09:48.367
<v Speaker 3>didn't have Colonel Sanders, who is the dude from Kentucky

0:09:48.367 --> 0:09:48.887
<v Speaker 3>Fried Chicken.

0:09:49.087 --> 0:09:49.567
<v Speaker 4>He's just the.

0:09:49.567 --> 0:09:52.287
<v Speaker 2>Dude on Kentucky Fried Chicken. To me, Kate is a

0:09:52.367 --> 0:09:55.527
<v Speaker 2>colonel of the Irish Guards, and she's like a corn colonel.

0:09:56.247 --> 0:09:58.767
<v Speaker 2>She's meant to be part of a big MARCHI festival

0:09:58.767 --> 0:10:00.887
<v Speaker 2>of soldiers in hats this week called the Trooping of

0:10:00.887 --> 0:10:03.727
<v Speaker 2>the Collar. She'd usually be there inspecting them. She wasn't,

0:10:03.767 --> 0:10:05.527
<v Speaker 2>of course, and she sent a letter saying she was

0:10:05.567 --> 0:10:07.607
<v Speaker 2>really sorry she couldn't be there, and it sparked a

0:10:07.647 --> 0:10:10.327
<v Speaker 2>whole new round of like, when's she going to come?

0:10:10.527 --> 0:10:12.367
<v Speaker 2>When are we going to see her again? When she's

0:10:12.367 --> 0:10:14.447
<v Speaker 2>coming back to work? And a story this week about

0:10:14.447 --> 0:10:18.087
<v Speaker 2>how she's just promoted her stylist to be her new

0:10:18.167 --> 0:10:20.647
<v Speaker 2>top assistant, and so everyone's like, oh, preparation for her

0:10:20.647 --> 0:10:23.087
<v Speaker 2>coming back, And I'm like, people, have we learned nothing?

0:10:23.247 --> 0:10:25.287
<v Speaker 3>No, No, I'm going to push back on you there,

0:10:25.687 --> 0:10:28.927
<v Speaker 3>Harley dot com. Because when there's someone you know and

0:10:28.927 --> 0:10:30.687
<v Speaker 3>we don't know her but we know of her, and

0:10:30.727 --> 0:10:34.687
<v Speaker 3>someone who's a public figure and they're going through something tough.

0:10:34.567 --> 0:10:36.607
<v Speaker 2>You want to check in. This one is really good

0:10:36.647 --> 0:10:40.767
<v Speaker 2>at you bringing it home with some more really good

0:10:40.767 --> 0:10:44.607
<v Speaker 2>information about really silly rich people. The Earl Spencer that

0:10:44.847 --> 0:10:48.647
<v Speaker 2>is Princess Diana's brother, Charles. He has burnt into Generation

0:10:48.887 --> 0:10:50.807
<v Speaker 2>x's memory as the guy who made the speech at

0:10:50.807 --> 0:10:52.847
<v Speaker 2>her funeral where he ripped the royal family a new

0:10:52.847 --> 0:10:53.527
<v Speaker 2>one right.

0:10:53.367 --> 0:10:55.487
<v Speaker 3>But has since been revealed to be a bit of

0:10:55.487 --> 0:10:55.727
<v Speaker 3>a dick.

0:10:55.807 --> 0:10:58.527
<v Speaker 4>Oh he's a massive dick by the Crown Moss disappointing.

0:10:58.647 --> 0:11:01.967
<v Speaker 2>He is getting his third divorce and he's hired the

0:11:02.007 --> 0:11:07.247
<v Speaker 2>same divorce lawyer who represented Charles when he divorced Diana.

0:11:07.767 --> 0:11:11.087
<v Speaker 2>She is known as a demon the She's widely regarded

0:11:11.127 --> 0:11:13.687
<v Speaker 2>to be the reason why Anna lost her title. Her

0:11:13.887 --> 0:11:17.447
<v Speaker 2>hr h Right she is and I love this so much. Right,

0:11:17.527 --> 0:11:19.527
<v Speaker 2>you will love her. In fact, you'll love her so much.

0:11:19.527 --> 0:11:20.647
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to show you a picture of her. I

0:11:20.687 --> 0:11:23.007
<v Speaker 2>feel like this is a betrayal. This is it, right?

0:11:23.047 --> 0:11:24.807
<v Speaker 2>I mean, can you imagine You're like, well, they she

0:11:24.847 --> 0:11:27.527
<v Speaker 2>did a right number on my sister. This woman, I

0:11:27.567 --> 0:11:31.847
<v Speaker 2>want her too. She is called Baroness Shackleton of Belgravier.

0:11:32.407 --> 0:11:33.807
<v Speaker 4>I love that.

0:11:34.287 --> 0:11:38.207
<v Speaker 2>And she does all the royal divorces. So she represented Charles,

0:11:38.247 --> 0:11:42.407
<v Speaker 2>she represented Andrew. She's also represented Paul McCartney, Madonna and

0:11:42.447 --> 0:11:43.127
<v Speaker 2>Liam Gallagha.

0:11:43.287 --> 0:11:44.367
<v Speaker 4>She sounds like a Harry Potter.

0:11:44.527 --> 0:11:51.287
<v Speaker 2>You will love her. She's wearing oh my god, she

0:11:51.367 --> 0:11:52.967
<v Speaker 2>looks amazing MEA's jacket.

0:11:53.007 --> 0:11:56.807
<v Speaker 3>She's wearing like a military jacks, scarves and a hat.

0:11:57.087 --> 0:11:58.847
<v Speaker 3>She's also terrifying.

0:11:59.647 --> 0:12:01.447
<v Speaker 2>She has a look on her face, that is like,

0:12:02.447 --> 0:12:03.047
<v Speaker 2>fuck with me.

0:12:03.127 --> 0:12:05.567
<v Speaker 4>Not when I hear the word baroness, that's exactly what

0:12:05.647 --> 0:12:06.087
<v Speaker 4>I think of.

0:12:06.247 --> 0:12:09.527
<v Speaker 2>And Belgravier, which is the poshest bit of London, can't

0:12:09.527 --> 0:12:12.287
<v Speaker 2>even set foot in there unless you're worth a bajillion dollars.

0:12:12.567 --> 0:12:15.487
<v Speaker 2>So she Charles has just hired her to get rid

0:12:15.527 --> 0:12:18.767
<v Speaker 2>of his third wife. I agree. I think it's a betrayal,

0:12:19.407 --> 0:12:21.687
<v Speaker 2>but fun anyway. Now you're up to date with a

0:12:21.687 --> 0:12:24.047
<v Speaker 2>lot of the meaningless information about people who have too

0:12:24.127 --> 0:12:26.407
<v Speaker 2>much money and yet live rent free. In my mind,

0:12:27.087 --> 0:12:29.047
<v Speaker 2>are we betting this segment in? Are we?

0:12:29.567 --> 0:12:42.527
<v Speaker 4>Is it coming back? I'm down down to as we've established.

0:12:46.647 --> 0:12:50.327
<v Speaker 1>The notion that you have to forgive in order to

0:12:50.887 --> 0:12:54.447
<v Speaker 1>move on in your life. That's outdated. Therapy, gray rocking

0:12:54.487 --> 0:12:57.367
<v Speaker 1>and going no contact is literally the only way to

0:12:57.527 --> 0:13:01.087
<v Speaker 1>avoid the manipulation all of it.

0:13:01.727 --> 0:13:03.927
<v Speaker 4>Have you heard of the gray rock theory?

0:13:04.487 --> 0:13:04.647
<v Speaker 5>No?

0:13:04.847 --> 0:13:05.367
<v Speaker 1>Okay?

0:13:05.767 --> 0:13:08.487
<v Speaker 4>Well? New York Times author Christina Karen wants you to

0:13:08.487 --> 0:13:11.487
<v Speaker 4>know what it is. So imagine there's a small gray

0:13:11.567 --> 0:13:14.047
<v Speaker 4>rock in your hand. It's a bit boring, a bit dull.

0:13:14.127 --> 0:13:16.727
<v Speaker 4>It looks the same on all sides. Are you really

0:13:16.727 --> 0:13:17.407
<v Speaker 4>bored right now?

0:13:17.567 --> 0:13:17.807
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:13:17.807 --> 0:13:20.127
<v Speaker 4>That's the whole point. I've got you, I've got you.

0:13:20.967 --> 0:13:24.607
<v Speaker 4>So there's a theory that if you adopt the qualities

0:13:24.647 --> 0:13:27.567
<v Speaker 4>of a gray rock, then you will be able to

0:13:27.607 --> 0:13:32.247
<v Speaker 4>repel the argumentative and antagonistic people in your life who

0:13:32.287 --> 0:13:33.407
<v Speaker 4>thrive off conflict.

0:13:33.527 --> 0:13:36.007
<v Speaker 2>Oh I do know this, So make it like a rock.

0:13:36.847 --> 0:13:37.367
<v Speaker 3>Like a rock.

0:13:37.767 --> 0:13:40.087
<v Speaker 4>So the idea of being a gray rock is to

0:13:40.167 --> 0:13:42.567
<v Speaker 4>not kind of like push people away from you. You're

0:13:42.567 --> 0:13:45.567
<v Speaker 4>still kind of engaging in a conversation, but you're not

0:13:45.687 --> 0:13:48.327
<v Speaker 4>oversharing because when you overshare to the wrong people, they

0:13:48.407 --> 0:13:49.767
<v Speaker 4>use that information against you.

0:13:50.047 --> 0:13:53.327
<v Speaker 3>So if you ask Siri to show you the opposite

0:13:53.367 --> 0:13:57.487
<v Speaker 3>of me in any conversation, they will show you a

0:13:57.687 --> 0:14:01.127
<v Speaker 3>gray rock. And that's why I'm so captivated by this technique,

0:14:01.167 --> 0:14:04.567
<v Speaker 3>because the gray rock technique is something that I really

0:14:04.567 --> 0:14:07.127
<v Speaker 3>feel like I need to master, particularly in this age

0:14:07.127 --> 0:14:10.967
<v Speaker 3>of social media, particularly currently, when there's so many people

0:14:11.087 --> 0:14:15.527
<v Speaker 3>screaming so many things. Arguing with them just never works,

0:14:15.887 --> 0:14:19.647
<v Speaker 3>It just never works. And so I've taken this approach

0:14:19.647 --> 0:14:22.247
<v Speaker 3>with trolls for a really long time. Be a gray rock.

0:14:22.407 --> 0:14:24.687
<v Speaker 3>It's a little bit like Michelle Obama, when they go low.

0:14:24.927 --> 0:14:25.567
<v Speaker 4>You go high.

0:14:26.047 --> 0:14:28.727
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, go as high as a gray rock, except they

0:14:28.767 --> 0:14:31.607
<v Speaker 2>sink to the bottom of the thing. I've actually got

0:14:31.607 --> 0:14:33.167
<v Speaker 2>a friend she'd be listening to this. In fact, hell

0:14:33.207 --> 0:14:35.887
<v Speaker 2>her a gray rock friend who is without knowing this

0:14:35.967 --> 0:14:39.167
<v Speaker 2>was what it's called, is what she's employing in like,

0:14:39.247 --> 0:14:42.487
<v Speaker 2>she's going through a really awful breakup, marriage breakup. Her

0:14:42.527 --> 0:14:46.687
<v Speaker 2>whole strategy is do less, do not engage yes, because apparently,

0:14:46.807 --> 0:14:50.727
<v Speaker 2>like psychopaths and narcissists are attracted to drama and they

0:14:50.767 --> 0:14:54.407
<v Speaker 2>can't stand being bored. So if you refuse to feed

0:14:54.527 --> 0:14:58.287
<v Speaker 2>them what they want, yes, like in terms of text messages,

0:14:58.367 --> 0:14:59.767
<v Speaker 2>you know, if they want to get into a fight

0:14:59.887 --> 0:15:04.167
<v Speaker 2>on text messages or something, then being very very calm

0:15:04.247 --> 0:15:07.967
<v Speaker 2>and very boring and very straight and only engaging with

0:15:08.527 --> 0:15:12.887
<v Speaker 2>like factual exchange and everything is a very effective strategy.

0:15:13.567 --> 0:15:15.247
<v Speaker 2>And I would love to be more gray rock to

0:15:15.367 --> 0:15:17.567
<v Speaker 2>me because one thing that I've realized, I think I'll

0:15:17.607 --> 0:15:19.567
<v Speaker 2>can remember we talked about this on the show or Not.

0:15:20.087 --> 0:15:23.007
<v Speaker 2>Soft power is about saying less, not more. I have

0:15:23.087 --> 0:15:24.967
<v Speaker 2>always and I think women are, without wanting to just

0:15:25.007 --> 0:15:28.887
<v Speaker 2>generalize enormously, we rush to feel silences. Yes, we justify ourselves.

0:15:29.127 --> 0:15:31.007
<v Speaker 2>We say I'd like that but is this and this

0:15:31.087 --> 0:15:32.487
<v Speaker 2>and this and this and this are all the reasons

0:15:32.487 --> 0:15:34.967
<v Speaker 2>why I shouldn't get it, whereas being a gray rock

0:15:35.127 --> 0:15:37.327
<v Speaker 2>is more like I'm just going to say what I

0:15:37.407 --> 0:15:39.527
<v Speaker 2>need and then I'm going to curl up in a

0:15:39.527 --> 0:15:40.127
<v Speaker 2>little gray ball.

0:15:40.527 --> 0:15:42.927
<v Speaker 3>Well, what I like is that there isn't curling up

0:15:43.087 --> 0:15:44.207
<v Speaker 3>in the gray rock.

0:15:44.247 --> 0:15:46.407
<v Speaker 2>It's not being a gray feather, that's true, or be

0:15:46.567 --> 0:15:48.447
<v Speaker 2>like a let yourself be kiy.

0:15:48.527 --> 0:15:50.447
<v Speaker 3>The technique is not don't be a gray piece of paper,

0:15:50.447 --> 0:15:53.087
<v Speaker 3>don't be a gray feather. Don't like just blow with

0:15:53.087 --> 0:15:54.967
<v Speaker 3>the wind and let the other person blow you over

0:15:55.727 --> 0:16:00.807
<v Speaker 3>stand your ground, but just be boring and take the

0:16:00.847 --> 0:16:03.287
<v Speaker 3>wind out of their sails by being boring?

0:16:03.447 --> 0:16:05.367
<v Speaker 2>Do you reckon that? This is the technique that you

0:16:05.447 --> 0:16:07.087
<v Speaker 2>might use even by accept when you don't want to

0:16:07.087 --> 0:16:09.607
<v Speaker 2>talk about something like how do you engage if someone

0:16:09.607 --> 0:16:11.727
<v Speaker 2>wants to engage you in a conversation that you do

0:16:11.767 --> 0:16:12.687
<v Speaker 2>not want to be engaged.

0:16:12.727 --> 0:16:15.127
<v Speaker 4>I'm a big yapper like I cannot ever be a

0:16:15.167 --> 0:16:17.607
<v Speaker 4>gray rock. I want to be, but I actually get

0:16:17.647 --> 0:16:22.367
<v Speaker 4>offended when someone's gray rocking me because I'm not there

0:16:22.407 --> 0:16:24.687
<v Speaker 4>to argue with them, which I think that article was

0:16:24.687 --> 0:16:26.767
<v Speaker 4>speculating that people just want to argue. I just love

0:16:26.767 --> 0:16:29.167
<v Speaker 4>a gossip, sesshon. I just want all the information. And

0:16:29.207 --> 0:16:31.447
<v Speaker 4>I've been gray rocked by a friend, which I feel

0:16:31.887 --> 0:16:35.687
<v Speaker 4>is so annoying in a way where I would like

0:16:35.887 --> 0:16:38.567
<v Speaker 4>ask about her life, like how's your partner? And then

0:16:38.567 --> 0:16:40.327
<v Speaker 4>she doesn't want to give me too much information. And

0:16:40.367 --> 0:16:42.687
<v Speaker 4>I don't see her as like gray rocking, as in

0:16:42.767 --> 0:16:44.767
<v Speaker 4>like she's being dull and boring. I see that as

0:16:44.967 --> 0:16:48.247
<v Speaker 4>she doesn't trust me enough to talk more about her life.

0:16:48.487 --> 0:16:50.807
<v Speaker 3>She probably doesn't, so it's a full of disengagement.

0:16:51.367 --> 0:16:53.407
<v Speaker 2>I do this like if there's something I really don't

0:16:53.407 --> 0:16:55.447
<v Speaker 2>want to talk about, Like, for example, at the moment

0:16:55.527 --> 0:16:58.687
<v Speaker 2>in my life, my least favorite question in the entire

0:16:58.727 --> 0:17:02.047
<v Speaker 2>world is how's the book going? Right? If somebody asked

0:17:02.087 --> 0:17:05.447
<v Speaker 2>me that fucking question just because it's difficult, I mean, rewrites,

0:17:05.487 --> 0:17:08.407
<v Speaker 2>it's hard, Like I just I don't want to talk

0:17:08.407 --> 0:17:08.767
<v Speaker 2>about it.

0:17:09.527 --> 0:17:12.247
<v Speaker 3>I asked her that in the kitchen at work, and

0:17:12.287 --> 0:17:13.007
<v Speaker 3>she gray robed me.

0:17:13.127 --> 0:17:15.087
<v Speaker 2>I did, And I do it with my friends and

0:17:15.127 --> 0:17:17.527
<v Speaker 2>sometimes they get upset. They'll be like, how's the book going?

0:17:17.887 --> 0:17:18.687
<v Speaker 2>That's just an example.

0:17:18.727 --> 0:17:22.727
<v Speaker 3>That's my curse with all of your books, and pretty

0:17:22.807 --> 0:17:25.687
<v Speaker 3>much most of the authors I know, they gray rock

0:17:26.327 --> 0:17:30.287
<v Speaker 3>that question, how's the book? And I don't know why.

0:17:30.247 --> 0:17:32.367
<v Speaker 2>It's because this is how it goes. If I don't

0:17:32.367 --> 0:17:33.967
<v Speaker 2>write so and I do this, I don't just do

0:17:34.047 --> 0:17:35.847
<v Speaker 2>this with you me or I do it with everything

0:17:35.967 --> 0:17:38.687
<v Speaker 2>and not always, but when you're at these tricky periods

0:17:38.727 --> 0:17:40.687
<v Speaker 2>that you're at, sometimes I'll just say I don't want

0:17:40.727 --> 0:17:42.687
<v Speaker 2>to talk about it, right. But the thing is is

0:17:42.687 --> 0:17:44.247
<v Speaker 2>if you say I don't want to talk about it,

0:17:44.247 --> 0:17:47.007
<v Speaker 2>it sounds like there's a big story. So then your

0:17:47.007 --> 0:17:49.527
<v Speaker 2>friend wants to open that door. Oh, why what's going on?

0:17:49.807 --> 0:17:52.727
<v Speaker 2>And they keep pushing because like the example that you

0:17:52.847 --> 0:17:56.047
<v Speaker 2>just gave, they probably think I'm being either rude or withholding.

0:17:56.087 --> 0:17:58.727
<v Speaker 2>There's really good gossip there, but I just don't want

0:17:58.767 --> 0:18:01.407
<v Speaker 2>to talk about it because I'm figuring it out because

0:18:01.887 --> 0:18:03.247
<v Speaker 2>I just don't want to talk about it, and I

0:18:03.247 --> 0:18:05.287
<v Speaker 2>don't have to. But there's no law that says I

0:18:05.327 --> 0:18:06.087
<v Speaker 2>have to talk about things.

0:18:06.127 --> 0:18:08.767
<v Speaker 3>I remember, I don't know you are paid to be

0:18:08.807 --> 0:18:09.247
<v Speaker 3>in a podcast.

0:18:10.087 --> 0:18:12.167
<v Speaker 4>Call you in a particularly bad time where I asked,

0:18:12.207 --> 0:18:14.687
<v Speaker 4>how's your book and you just said nope, And I.

0:18:14.567 --> 0:18:16.407
<v Speaker 2>Was like, I got it. Shut down.

0:18:16.607 --> 0:18:19.127
<v Speaker 4>Shut down that was like hardcore, that was a cold

0:18:19.127 --> 0:18:22.007
<v Speaker 4>that wasn't just a gray rock? So is that rude?

0:18:22.247 --> 0:18:24.687
<v Speaker 2>Is there a way to shut down a conversation you

0:18:24.687 --> 0:18:26.887
<v Speaker 2>don't want to have that isn't rude? Is gray rocking

0:18:26.887 --> 0:18:27.647
<v Speaker 2>always rude?

0:18:27.727 --> 0:18:30.087
<v Speaker 4>I think you saying I don't want to talk about

0:18:30.127 --> 0:18:33.767
<v Speaker 4>it is better than trying to gray rock someone and

0:18:33.847 --> 0:18:37.767
<v Speaker 4>like shifting the conversation. But yeah, there's also there's also

0:18:37.807 --> 0:18:40.047
<v Speaker 4>the idea of soft gray rocking, where you like keep

0:18:40.087 --> 0:18:42.767
<v Speaker 4>having the conversation, but you're not giving them the answer

0:18:42.807 --> 0:18:45.607
<v Speaker 4>they want. So a TikTok gave an example of like

0:18:45.647 --> 0:18:47.527
<v Speaker 4>if you're looking for a job, and instead of saying

0:18:47.527 --> 0:18:49.887
<v Speaker 4>to your friend it's really hard to find a job,

0:18:50.047 --> 0:18:53.887
<v Speaker 4>you say, I'm networking right now, still searching, so you're

0:18:53.887 --> 0:18:55.967
<v Speaker 4>not going too deep into the emotion factor.

0:18:56.087 --> 0:18:56.527
<v Speaker 2>I agree.

0:18:56.607 --> 0:18:59.767
<v Speaker 3>So I think that the point of gray rocking is

0:18:59.847 --> 0:19:03.087
<v Speaker 3>to not invite further questions or speculations. So I think

0:19:03.127 --> 0:19:05.447
<v Speaker 3>instead of saying I don't want to talk about it

0:19:05.567 --> 0:19:07.727
<v Speaker 3>for the reasons that you just said, you should just

0:19:07.767 --> 0:19:12.287
<v Speaker 3>say get there. Yeah, And because that's like a boring thing,

0:19:12.727 --> 0:19:15.807
<v Speaker 3>like how is your weekend? Not that that's just a

0:19:15.847 --> 0:19:18.727
<v Speaker 3>boring answer, that's gray Rock, instead of going.

0:19:18.607 --> 0:19:20.327
<v Speaker 2>Oh, I don't want to talk about it because that's

0:19:20.367 --> 0:19:23.087
<v Speaker 2>not actually gray Rock. That's not gray Rock. I'm being

0:19:23.127 --> 0:19:24.167
<v Speaker 2>a bit of a drama queen.

0:19:24.367 --> 0:19:27.447
<v Speaker 3>Well, you're not intentionally being a drama queen. You're probably

0:19:27.487 --> 0:19:29.407
<v Speaker 3>being really honest because you don't.

0:19:29.167 --> 0:19:30.967
<v Speaker 4>Want to put in that emotion in there so they

0:19:31.007 --> 0:19:33.327
<v Speaker 4>know how you feel. Yeah, gray Rock.

0:19:33.367 --> 0:19:37.007
<v Speaker 3>Is boring, and yet it knows where it stands. So

0:19:37.207 --> 0:19:41.447
<v Speaker 3>if someone tries to engage you in a conversation about politics,

0:19:42.047 --> 0:19:45.687
<v Speaker 3>you just say like a platitude, Yeah, God, what a time,

0:19:46.887 --> 0:19:50.007
<v Speaker 3>or like oh it's so difficult, isn't it? And it's

0:19:50.127 --> 0:19:53.767
<v Speaker 3>not what they want. And so what they'll do is

0:19:53.767 --> 0:19:56.487
<v Speaker 3>that they're looking for someone to match their level of

0:19:56.527 --> 0:20:00.247
<v Speaker 3>intensity and their level of passion and engagement. And if

0:20:00.287 --> 0:20:03.127
<v Speaker 3>you don't offer that to them, they'll go find someone

0:20:03.127 --> 0:20:05.967
<v Speaker 3>else who will. That's how it gets you out of it.

0:20:06.647 --> 0:20:08.447
<v Speaker 4>That's smart. Okay. I think I need to adopt this.

0:20:08.447 --> 0:20:10.727
<v Speaker 3>Because it's like being a smart target. It's making yourself

0:20:10.727 --> 0:20:12.847
<v Speaker 3>a really small target. If I say how's the book

0:20:12.887 --> 0:20:15.647
<v Speaker 3>and you go get there, there's nothing left to say.

0:20:15.847 --> 0:20:18.367
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm so gonna say that yeah. From now on,

0:20:18.807 --> 0:20:20.727
<v Speaker 2>in my mind, all I'm going to think is gray rock,

0:20:21.007 --> 0:20:23.567
<v Speaker 2>gray rock, but not like gray rock that I'm throwing

0:20:23.607 --> 0:20:25.847
<v Speaker 2>it at you, like, don't want to talk about it.

0:20:25.847 --> 0:20:26.607
<v Speaker 2>It's just gray rock.

0:20:26.687 --> 0:20:31.087
<v Speaker 3>Like out louders tell us what your gray rock phrases are.

0:20:31.247 --> 0:20:33.527
<v Speaker 3>It's like we need to build a tool kit, neit,

0:20:33.567 --> 0:20:36.847
<v Speaker 3>a bible of phrases that you can throw out there,

0:20:36.927 --> 0:20:38.047
<v Speaker 3>like what a time?

0:20:41.647 --> 0:20:43.927
<v Speaker 4>And I have to practice saying it without sounding sarcastic

0:20:43.967 --> 0:20:44.327
<v Speaker 4>as well.

0:20:44.487 --> 0:20:47.447
<v Speaker 3>Exactly, you have to deliver it in a really really neutral,

0:20:47.487 --> 0:20:49.727
<v Speaker 3>monotone way. How do you do it verbally versus in

0:20:49.767 --> 0:20:52.847
<v Speaker 3>a text message? Sometimes I find the text message version

0:20:52.847 --> 0:20:55.687
<v Speaker 3>of gray rock could be an emoji, sometimes just a

0:20:55.767 --> 0:20:59.327
<v Speaker 3>thumbs up or just a like a shocked face is

0:20:59.367 --> 0:21:01.727
<v Speaker 3>a version of a gray rock because it's like it's

0:21:01.727 --> 0:21:04.007
<v Speaker 3>a blank canvas, really, but it just says yep, I

0:21:04.087 --> 0:21:05.687
<v Speaker 3>hear you. Nothing to add.

0:21:05.727 --> 0:21:07.967
<v Speaker 2>It's interesting, isn't it that we think it's rude to

0:21:08.127 --> 0:21:10.887
<v Speaker 2>not jump in and get with everybody when actually you

0:21:10.887 --> 0:21:11.727
<v Speaker 2>don't know everybody.

0:21:11.767 --> 0:21:14.127
<v Speaker 4>All your explanations, I think it depends on the person.

0:21:14.487 --> 0:21:17.407
<v Speaker 3>That's what Princess Kate is. She's gray rocking. Yes, she's trying.

0:21:18.087 --> 0:21:18.487
<v Speaker 2>It's me.

0:21:19.127 --> 0:21:20.447
<v Speaker 3>I'm a gray Rock.

0:21:22.807 --> 0:21:26.407
<v Speaker 2>Every Tuesday and Thursday we drop new segments of Mom

0:21:26.447 --> 0:21:29.807
<v Speaker 2>and Me Are Out Loud just for Mom and Mia subscribers.

0:21:30.367 --> 0:21:32.167
<v Speaker 2>Follow the link in the show notes to get your

0:21:32.247 --> 0:21:35.087
<v Speaker 2>daily dose of Out Loud and a big thank you

0:21:35.127 --> 0:21:38.287
<v Speaker 2>to all our current subscribers.

0:21:42.127 --> 0:21:45.047
<v Speaker 3>Everything old is new again. First, it was ballet flats

0:21:45.247 --> 0:21:48.247
<v Speaker 3>that came back. Then low rise jeans, although they seem

0:21:48.287 --> 0:21:51.167
<v Speaker 3>to have disappeared again thank god, because everybody said get stuffed.

0:21:51.927 --> 0:21:54.807
<v Speaker 3>Now it's the turn of lads mags to make a

0:21:54.847 --> 0:21:58.207
<v Speaker 3>resurgence with the news that Loaded magazine is coming back.

0:21:58.287 --> 0:22:01.127
<v Speaker 3>In the UK, there was a headline that caught out

0:22:01.127 --> 0:22:04.887
<v Speaker 3>behind this week that said Loaded Magazine the saddest relaunch

0:22:04.887 --> 0:22:07.407
<v Speaker 3>in history or a safe space for middle aged men.

0:22:09.767 --> 0:22:13.207
<v Speaker 3>If you don't remember what Loaded magazine was, you'll know

0:22:13.527 --> 0:22:15.447
<v Speaker 3>the genre of magazine that it.

0:22:15.487 --> 0:22:16.047
<v Speaker 2>Was part of.

0:22:16.807 --> 0:22:19.447
<v Speaker 3>They were huge worldwide back in the nineties and early

0:22:19.487 --> 0:22:22.447
<v Speaker 3>two thousands, before anyone knew what sexism was or that

0:22:22.487 --> 0:22:24.167
<v Speaker 3>telling a woman she had nice chits is not a

0:22:24.167 --> 0:22:28.527
<v Speaker 3>great thing to do at work. There was the Australian version, which.

0:22:28.367 --> 0:22:29.087
<v Speaker 2>Was called Ralph.

0:22:29.407 --> 0:22:31.327
<v Speaker 4>Remember Ralph, no I don't I worked.

0:22:31.127 --> 0:22:32.647
<v Speaker 3>In that, No, you wouldn't. I worked in the same

0:22:32.647 --> 0:22:35.087
<v Speaker 3>magazine company as Ralph, and there were some great journalists

0:22:35.087 --> 0:22:37.767
<v Speaker 3>who used to write for Ralph. There was FHM, and

0:22:37.927 --> 0:22:40.607
<v Speaker 3>of course Loaded. They were kind of like Playboy or Penthouse,

0:22:41.047 --> 0:22:43.887
<v Speaker 3>but without actual new nudity. Like the closest I would

0:22:43.927 --> 0:22:46.047
<v Speaker 3>say is that they were like Cosmo or Cleo, but

0:22:46.207 --> 0:22:49.647
<v Speaker 3>for men, except they also had women on the cover,

0:22:49.727 --> 0:22:52.007
<v Speaker 3>which was weird. Isn't not funny how women's magazines had

0:22:52.007 --> 0:22:54.207
<v Speaker 3>women on the cover and men's magazines had women on

0:22:54.247 --> 0:22:54.967
<v Speaker 3>the cover as well.

0:22:55.127 --> 0:22:56.887
<v Speaker 4>Sometimes they had a car, which is kind of.

0:22:57.087 --> 0:22:59.807
<v Speaker 3>No, they didn't, not those lads' mags because it was

0:22:59.807 --> 0:23:01.207
<v Speaker 3>all about being a lad. Can you explain what.

0:23:01.207 --> 0:23:04.967
<v Speaker 2>A ladd in Britain actually when Loaded first launched, And

0:23:05.047 --> 0:23:08.647
<v Speaker 2>it's hard to overstate the cultural shift that magazine represented.

0:23:09.287 --> 0:23:11.847
<v Speaker 2>Magazine couldn't affect culture in that way now, there's just

0:23:11.887 --> 0:23:14.447
<v Speaker 2>no way, you know, but it really it was a

0:23:14.487 --> 0:23:16.727
<v Speaker 2>new genre. It was an entirely new genre. They did

0:23:16.807 --> 0:23:18.367
<v Speaker 2>used to have men on the cover, but in a

0:23:18.487 --> 0:23:21.007
<v Speaker 2>very stylish, stylized way, and then they'd also have women,

0:23:21.007 --> 0:23:22.887
<v Speaker 2>and then as it evolved, it just turned into women

0:23:23.367 --> 0:23:26.327
<v Speaker 2>but Loaded. When it launched, it said the editor was

0:23:26.367 --> 0:23:29.807
<v Speaker 2>this guy called James Brown who became like an absolute celebrity.

0:23:30.247 --> 0:23:34.287
<v Speaker 2>And he said, Loaded is a new magazine dedicated to life, liberty,

0:23:34.327 --> 0:23:37.127
<v Speaker 2>and the pursuit of sex, drink, football and less serious matters.

0:23:37.287 --> 0:23:40.447
<v Speaker 2>Loaded his music, film, relationships, humor, travel sport, hard news

0:23:40.447 --> 0:23:43.607
<v Speaker 2>and popular culture. Loaded his clubbing, drinking, eating, playing and eating.

0:23:43.887 --> 0:23:45.567
<v Speaker 2>Loaded is for the man who believes he can do

0:23:45.567 --> 0:23:48.127
<v Speaker 2>anything if only he wasn't hungover. So you get the vibe.

0:23:48.807 --> 0:23:52.207
<v Speaker 2>This is the hard partying nineties, and it was hard

0:23:52.247 --> 0:23:55.927
<v Speaker 2>partying in those days. And it was like, we are

0:23:56.207 --> 0:23:59.127
<v Speaker 2>blokes who like we might like a smart political article,

0:23:59.167 --> 0:24:01.647
<v Speaker 2>and actually politicians used to try and get interviewed in

0:24:01.687 --> 0:24:04.687
<v Speaker 2>these magazines because they were so influential. But we also

0:24:04.727 --> 0:24:07.367
<v Speaker 2>want to look at a woman in arundes and really

0:24:07.407 --> 0:24:10.327
<v Speaker 2>famous women would go unloaded in those days. They weren't

0:24:10.367 --> 0:24:15.327
<v Speaker 2>like naked naked, but they were very male gayzy to

0:24:15.447 --> 0:24:15.767
<v Speaker 2>use me.

0:24:15.887 --> 0:24:19.367
<v Speaker 3>So they would be in like lingerie or like tiny

0:24:19.367 --> 0:24:23.007
<v Speaker 3>little denim cutoffs, like very sexy, or like swimsuits that

0:24:23.087 --> 0:24:23.527
<v Speaker 3>kind of thing.

0:24:23.567 --> 0:24:28.247
<v Speaker 4>So it's probably not a thing like well, different thing.

0:24:28.487 --> 0:24:31.727
<v Speaker 3>There was like Playboy in Penthouse and those magazines, but

0:24:31.767 --> 0:24:34.567
<v Speaker 3>this didn't have actual nudity. It was like it had

0:24:34.567 --> 0:24:36.527
<v Speaker 3>a little bit of clothes, but it was the same

0:24:36.607 --> 0:24:41.167
<v Speaker 3>sort of objectifying cultural attitude to women that women are decorative,

0:24:41.167 --> 0:24:43.767
<v Speaker 3>women are there to be ogled at and looked at,

0:24:43.887 --> 0:24:46.847
<v Speaker 3>and so now it's coming back because that's what we want.

0:24:48.327 --> 0:24:51.647
<v Speaker 3>But here's the twist. It has a female editor. The

0:24:51.727 --> 0:24:55.247
<v Speaker 3>magazine's executive editor is a woman named Danny Levy. She's

0:24:55.287 --> 0:24:58.767
<v Speaker 3>not a journalist, so she's a fitness influencer, no shade,

0:24:58.927 --> 0:25:00.967
<v Speaker 3>and she said, our goal is to bring back all

0:25:01.007 --> 0:25:03.607
<v Speaker 3>of those things that thirty five to fifty five year

0:25:03.647 --> 0:25:07.527
<v Speaker 3>old men are being cheated out of by society being

0:25:07.567 --> 0:25:10.807
<v Speaker 3>able to ogle beautiful women like is Hurly, Melinda Messenger

0:25:11.127 --> 0:25:14.887
<v Speaker 3>or Pamela Anderson. So you can see this is appealing

0:25:14.927 --> 0:25:16.967
<v Speaker 3>to the reader of these mags who were in their

0:25:16.967 --> 0:25:20.727
<v Speaker 3>twenties and thirties or even teens back then and are

0:25:20.767 --> 0:25:23.767
<v Speaker 3>now a bit older than that. She went on to say,

0:25:23.767 --> 0:25:26.607
<v Speaker 3>the original loaded audience who are now living happily at

0:25:26.607 --> 0:25:29.367
<v Speaker 3>home with their wife and kids, but still reminisce about

0:25:29.367 --> 0:25:32.927
<v Speaker 3>their nights spent clubbing until three am, drinking one dollar

0:25:32.927 --> 0:25:36.647
<v Speaker 3>shots with a bedroom covered in posters of half naked women. Yes,

0:25:36.807 --> 0:25:42.767
<v Speaker 3>those were good old days, Holly, Should you.

0:25:42.927 --> 0:25:43.847
<v Speaker 2>Live with a man in that?

0:25:43.927 --> 0:25:44.127
<v Speaker 5>DEVI?

0:25:44.247 --> 0:25:47.767
<v Speaker 3>It's so true? What should we do about the fact

0:25:47.807 --> 0:25:52.007
<v Speaker 3>that men have lost the right to ogil innocently? Is

0:25:52.047 --> 0:25:54.167
<v Speaker 3>there a march we could go on? Can we contribute

0:25:54.207 --> 0:25:55.007
<v Speaker 3>to a gofund me?

0:25:55.647 --> 0:25:57.767
<v Speaker 4>Do we buy all the copies and then keeping mouth?

0:25:58.367 --> 0:26:00.687
<v Speaker 2>Won't somebody think of the poor middle aged men.

0:26:00.607 --> 0:26:02.807
<v Speaker 3>Who come out and I feel so sorry for them.

0:26:02.847 --> 0:26:05.127
<v Speaker 2>There was a place they could go to look at

0:26:05.207 --> 0:26:08.887
<v Speaker 2>naked women and the privacy of their own home. I

0:26:08.927 --> 0:26:11.567
<v Speaker 2>don't think anyone thinks this relaunch is going to work

0:26:11.647 --> 0:26:15.367
<v Speaker 2>because of the Internet. But what's really interesting when you

0:26:15.407 --> 0:26:17.927
<v Speaker 2>dig into what they're talking about here, and so it's

0:26:18.047 --> 0:26:21.207
<v Speaker 2>kind of doing this like we're pushing back against political correctness.

0:26:21.247 --> 0:26:24.007
<v Speaker 2>But this woman has also said that she wants loaded

0:26:24.047 --> 0:26:27.047
<v Speaker 2>to be a safe space, which is a very millennial

0:26:27.127 --> 0:26:30.887
<v Speaker 2>term for men who are like scared and repulsed by

0:26:30.887 --> 0:26:33.847
<v Speaker 2>the extremity of porn online. Yeah, but want to look

0:26:33.847 --> 0:26:37.167
<v Speaker 2>at a nice pair of boobs. They're obviously deciding that

0:26:37.207 --> 0:26:40.007
<v Speaker 2>there is a gap in the market for that. I

0:26:40.167 --> 0:26:42.367
<v Speaker 2>don't think there is a gap in the market for that,

0:26:42.447 --> 0:26:45.567
<v Speaker 2>because aren't we surrounded by that a lot of the time.

0:26:45.687 --> 0:26:49.687
<v Speaker 3>Well that's called Instagram. Yeah, I'm going to defend this

0:26:49.847 --> 0:26:54.727
<v Speaker 3>idea because I was thinking about it. How are those

0:26:54.767 --> 0:26:59.727
<v Speaker 3>magazines different to the way women's magazines and girls magazines

0:26:59.807 --> 0:27:04.167
<v Speaker 3>like Dolly and Cleo and Cosmo used to objectify men

0:27:04.487 --> 0:27:06.167
<v Speaker 3>Like I know, we didn't have them on the cover,

0:27:06.407 --> 0:27:10.647
<v Speaker 3>but there were pinups of hot teenage with their shirts off.

0:27:10.887 --> 0:27:14.607
<v Speaker 3>Cleo had Australia's fifty most eligible bachelors every year the

0:27:14.687 --> 0:27:19.247
<v Speaker 3>Male Centerfold. That desire shouldn't be villified, or we shouldn't

0:27:19.287 --> 0:27:22.607
<v Speaker 3>shame people for it. So where can people do that

0:27:22.647 --> 0:27:24.007
<v Speaker 3>in a way that's not creepy?

0:27:24.247 --> 0:27:27.287
<v Speaker 2>Well, everywhere anywhere on the internet where there are pictures

0:27:27.327 --> 0:27:29.607
<v Speaker 2>of women. What are things I find really interesting about

0:27:29.607 --> 0:27:32.967
<v Speaker 2>this because really, if you track the history of those magazines,

0:27:33.447 --> 0:27:35.167
<v Speaker 2>and I was of the age as you were, me

0:27:35.247 --> 0:27:38.247
<v Speaker 2>aware and particularly in Britain just before I left to

0:27:38.247 --> 0:27:42.207
<v Speaker 2>come to Australia, this was the culture and women were

0:27:42.247 --> 0:27:44.767
<v Speaker 2>part of it, right. We were quite convinced that this

0:27:44.967 --> 0:27:47.927
<v Speaker 2>was like quite revolutionary and cool and girls could be

0:27:48.007 --> 0:27:50.047
<v Speaker 2>lads too because women could go out drinking as well

0:27:50.087 --> 0:27:53.007
<v Speaker 2>and have fun with the boys. And we didn't hate

0:27:53.047 --> 0:27:55.447
<v Speaker 2>those magazines in the way that we had come to

0:27:55.527 --> 0:27:58.367
<v Speaker 2>understand that Playboy and Penthouse and stuff was sexist, that

0:27:58.407 --> 0:28:01.007
<v Speaker 2>the Benny Hill Show was sexist. You know that page

0:28:01.007 --> 0:28:03.647
<v Speaker 2>three we literally had in the newspaper in Britain. You

0:28:03.687 --> 0:28:05.167
<v Speaker 2>opened it on page three, there was a picture of

0:28:05.207 --> 0:28:07.847
<v Speaker 2>a topless woman, that that was sexist. This was like

0:28:07.887 --> 0:28:10.007
<v Speaker 2>the next wave, and I thought we were in on

0:28:10.087 --> 0:28:13.647
<v Speaker 2>the joke. But what happened, perhaps inevitably, as with all

0:28:13.687 --> 0:28:18.487
<v Speaker 2>cultural shifts, is it got polluted and poisoned and became

0:28:18.607 --> 0:28:21.047
<v Speaker 2>very clear eight years later or whatever, that we weren't

0:28:21.047 --> 0:28:22.607
<v Speaker 2>in on the joke, and that we were every bit

0:28:22.647 --> 0:28:25.967
<v Speaker 2>as much commodified and objectified by it as all those

0:28:26.007 --> 0:28:26.567
<v Speaker 2>other things.

0:28:26.687 --> 0:28:26.887
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:28:27.447 --> 0:28:30.367
<v Speaker 2>The reason that they stopped selling, though, is because of

0:28:30.407 --> 0:28:32.847
<v Speaker 2>the Internet. That's really why they stopped selling. It's not

0:28:32.927 --> 0:28:35.247
<v Speaker 2>like men suddenly went I don't want to look at

0:28:35.327 --> 0:28:38.727
<v Speaker 2>naked women anymore. It's that they went, there's somewhere I

0:28:38.767 --> 0:28:39.807
<v Speaker 2>can do that for free.

0:28:39.887 --> 0:28:42.927
<v Speaker 3>So what about this idea? And I'm interested to hear

0:28:42.967 --> 0:28:46.527
<v Speaker 3>what you think about this being a middle ground, because

0:28:46.527 --> 0:28:48.167
<v Speaker 3>of course you could look at all of these women.

0:28:48.727 --> 0:28:50.367
<v Speaker 3>You could look at porn. You could look at all

0:28:50.367 --> 0:28:53.087
<v Speaker 3>of that for free on the internet. But what about

0:28:53.127 --> 0:28:55.487
<v Speaker 3>what Holly said about how there are some guys who

0:28:55.687 --> 0:28:58.247
<v Speaker 3>might want to look at attractive women, but they don't

0:28:58.247 --> 0:29:00.567
<v Speaker 3>want to be creepy. They've got problems with porn. They

0:29:00.567 --> 0:29:03.007
<v Speaker 3>don't want to watch porn. It's creepy if they're just

0:29:03.087 --> 0:29:05.727
<v Speaker 3>on Instagram following a whole lot of fitness influences and

0:29:05.767 --> 0:29:08.887
<v Speaker 3>bikini models. So where do they go.

0:29:09.247 --> 0:29:13.087
<v Speaker 4>I'm just really confused on why these men staring at

0:29:13.127 --> 0:29:15.767
<v Speaker 4>these photos of women who are like semi clothed. What

0:29:15.887 --> 0:29:18.327
<v Speaker 4>goes through their heads that's different to what goes through

0:29:18.327 --> 0:29:21.487
<v Speaker 4>their heads when they're watching porn. Like, I don't understand

0:29:21.527 --> 0:29:25.727
<v Speaker 4>where the difference happens, because it's still like salacious. It's

0:29:25.727 --> 0:29:28.767
<v Speaker 4>still like photos that they're ashamed to be looking at.

0:29:28.967 --> 0:29:31.047
<v Speaker 3>Why do they have to be ashamed? Like why is

0:29:31.087 --> 0:29:33.287
<v Speaker 3>admiring someone of the opposite sex?

0:29:33.367 --> 0:29:37.167
<v Speaker 4>But are they admiring it? They're like oo ogling.

0:29:38.327 --> 0:29:40.967
<v Speaker 3>Okay, So when photos are on the Daily Mail of

0:29:41.007 --> 0:29:43.367
<v Speaker 3>Chris Hemsworth on the set of a movie or surfing

0:29:43.447 --> 0:29:47.207
<v Speaker 3>with his shirt off, and women are like, oh, look

0:29:47.247 --> 0:29:51.567
<v Speaker 3>at him or go to a bachelorette party. Yeah, exactly,

0:29:51.567 --> 0:29:53.247
<v Speaker 3>and they are male strippers or they go to a

0:29:53.327 --> 0:29:56.087
<v Speaker 3>club or whatever. That seems to be okay.

0:29:56.447 --> 0:29:59.287
<v Speaker 4>I don't think where like looking at Chris Hemsworth and

0:29:59.287 --> 0:30:02.407
<v Speaker 4>then just staring at him and staring at his abs

0:30:02.447 --> 0:30:04.967
<v Speaker 4>and thinking about him and thinking about having sex, and

0:30:05.007 --> 0:30:07.967
<v Speaker 4>then downloading the photo or buying a magazine just to

0:30:08.007 --> 0:30:08.527
<v Speaker 4>look at him.

0:30:08.607 --> 0:30:11.047
<v Speaker 3>You don't know. So when we had women's magazines in

0:30:11.087 --> 0:30:13.447
<v Speaker 3>the nineties and way before the nineties and into the

0:30:13.487 --> 0:30:17.087
<v Speaker 3>early two thousands, the idea of objectifying men was so

0:30:17.167 --> 0:30:20.127
<v Speaker 3>subversive that that is what we did. So there were

0:30:20.167 --> 0:30:23.207
<v Speaker 3>posters of hot guys. I mean, when girls grow up,

0:30:23.247 --> 0:30:25.287
<v Speaker 3>they have guys celebrity.

0:30:25.887 --> 0:30:28.447
<v Speaker 4>It's different to having like model like guys. Like I

0:30:28.447 --> 0:30:30.447
<v Speaker 4>would have posters of Jesse McCartney on my wall, but

0:30:30.487 --> 0:30:32.407
<v Speaker 4>it was because I was like, that's going to be

0:30:32.487 --> 0:30:34.927
<v Speaker 4>my future husband, not because he was a sexy man

0:30:34.927 --> 0:30:35.527
<v Speaker 4>that I was like.

0:30:35.967 --> 0:30:38.367
<v Speaker 3>And you didn't want to just get to know his personality?

0:30:38.847 --> 0:30:41.327
<v Speaker 3>I did, Yeah, but come on, you're a horny.

0:30:41.087 --> 0:30:43.807
<v Speaker 4>Little Teenager's aney teenager? But looking at him, But I

0:30:43.847 --> 0:30:47.487
<v Speaker 4>wouldn't be like ogling him and I wouldn't be buying

0:30:47.527 --> 0:30:50.727
<v Speaker 4>magazines that were just of like hot men to look at.

0:30:51.127 --> 0:30:52.807
<v Speaker 3>I think that's not the only thing that's in these

0:30:52.807 --> 0:30:53.687
<v Speaker 3>magazines to be.

0:30:53.727 --> 0:30:56.167
<v Speaker 2>Well, no, so, I mean the thing about these magazines

0:30:56.327 --> 0:30:58.367
<v Speaker 2>is that, And certainly at the beginning, I don't think

0:30:58.367 --> 0:31:01.367
<v Speaker 2>its a magazine. Is that's true? I don't.

0:31:01.527 --> 0:31:02.087
<v Speaker 4>I don't get it.

0:31:02.167 --> 0:31:04.367
<v Speaker 2>You know how there's that cliche that, oh, men, I

0:31:04.447 --> 0:31:06.607
<v Speaker 2>used to buy Playboy for the articles, right, that's like

0:31:06.647 --> 0:31:08.167
<v Speaker 2>a thing that people say. And the thing is is

0:31:08.247 --> 0:31:10.007
<v Speaker 2>there was an element of that that's true. There was

0:31:10.047 --> 0:31:11.927
<v Speaker 2>a time in the sixties and seventies and stuff where

0:31:11.967 --> 0:31:14.287
<v Speaker 2>the best journalists in the world wrote for those magazines

0:31:14.887 --> 0:31:17.367
<v Speaker 2>next to the pictures of the naked ladies, right yeah.

0:31:17.567 --> 0:31:19.687
<v Speaker 2>And then in the nineties that's kind of what happened

0:31:19.727 --> 0:31:22.207
<v Speaker 2>in the Best of these Lads mags. So the loaded

0:31:22.287 --> 0:31:26.567
<v Speaker 2>ralph irreverent, funny, smart journalism, as I say, as it

0:31:26.647 --> 0:31:29.847
<v Speaker 2>kind of descended into a cost cutting let's just say

0:31:29.847 --> 0:31:32.527
<v Speaker 2>what it is and do away with the articles. That changed.

0:31:32.847 --> 0:31:35.767
<v Speaker 2>But the idea was then I suppose that you know,

0:31:35.807 --> 0:31:38.567
<v Speaker 2>how we say about women, we can be interested in,

0:31:39.207 --> 0:31:41.687
<v Speaker 2>you know, serious things and silly things. We can be

0:31:41.767 --> 0:31:45.287
<v Speaker 2>interested in lipstick and politics whatever. That was basically the

0:31:45.327 --> 0:31:49.287
<v Speaker 2>premise of these magazines. Men could be interested in reading

0:31:49.487 --> 0:31:51.927
<v Speaker 2>an interview with the Prime Minister and want to look

0:31:51.927 --> 0:31:53.687
<v Speaker 2>at a picture of a woman with her tits out

0:31:53.927 --> 0:31:56.567
<v Speaker 2>and at the time looking at a woman a picture

0:31:56.567 --> 0:31:58.167
<v Speaker 2>of a woman with the tits out. If you were

0:31:58.207 --> 0:32:01.767
<v Speaker 2>doing it with like this sort of slightly ironic raised

0:32:01.807 --> 0:32:05.207
<v Speaker 2>eyebrow that these magazines pretended they had was like fine,

0:32:05.687 --> 0:32:08.207
<v Speaker 2>Where that led us? They were also in humor, they

0:32:08.207 --> 0:32:11.207
<v Speaker 2>were funny, like the best of them were very very funny.

0:32:11.607 --> 0:32:13.447
<v Speaker 2>Where that led us though, And that's what I mean

0:32:13.487 --> 0:32:15.247
<v Speaker 2>when I say I feel like we were all sold

0:32:15.487 --> 0:32:18.167
<v Speaker 2>a big lie. There is Where it led us, though,

0:32:18.527 --> 0:32:22.167
<v Speaker 2>was to just the same objectified place that we started in.

0:32:22.407 --> 0:32:22.607
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:32:23.247 --> 0:32:26.487
<v Speaker 2>I don't think you can make the comparison with men

0:32:26.567 --> 0:32:28.887
<v Speaker 2>with their shirts off in girls magazines. I just don't,

0:32:28.927 --> 0:32:31.767
<v Speaker 2>because I just think the politics, the history, all of

0:32:31.807 --> 0:32:33.567
<v Speaker 2>the cultural context of that doesn't work.

0:32:33.687 --> 0:32:33.847
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:32:33.847 --> 0:32:34.887
<v Speaker 2>I just don't think it does.

0:32:35.007 --> 0:32:36.807
<v Speaker 3>No, no, no, But once said, because all I was

0:32:36.807 --> 0:32:41.047
<v Speaker 3>comparing is that there will always be an innate human

0:32:41.127 --> 0:32:43.607
<v Speaker 3>desire to look at people that you want to have

0:32:43.647 --> 0:32:44.087
<v Speaker 3>sex with.

0:32:44.207 --> 0:32:46.487
<v Speaker 2>And I think that that I mean of course there

0:32:46.527 --> 0:32:48.527
<v Speaker 2>is right, And I think what's interesting is what's coming

0:32:48.567 --> 0:32:50.327
<v Speaker 2>through and what am saying, I don't want to misrepresent you,

0:32:51.007 --> 0:32:53.287
<v Speaker 2>is that we should all at least pretend that that's

0:32:53.327 --> 0:32:54.807
<v Speaker 2>not what we want to do. We don't want to

0:32:54.807 --> 0:32:57.607
<v Speaker 2>look at pictures of beautiful people, Whereas what I think

0:32:57.687 --> 0:33:00.167
<v Speaker 2>is actually what's happened is people will always want to

0:33:00.207 --> 0:33:01.847
<v Speaker 2>do that and they've just found another way to do

0:33:01.887 --> 0:33:06.767
<v Speaker 2>it that's free. And the notion that men need permission

0:33:07.567 --> 0:33:11.967
<v Speaker 2>to ogle women and that's what this magazine is aiming

0:33:12.007 --> 0:33:14.087
<v Speaker 2>to give them back. That's what she's saying, like, we're

0:33:14.127 --> 0:33:16.527
<v Speaker 2>giving it back to you, the permission to have a

0:33:16.647 --> 0:33:20.927
<v Speaker 2>more innocent, sort of dopamine hit of nudity. Because she

0:33:21.007 --> 0:33:22.687
<v Speaker 2>was saying, you know, they've been turned off by the

0:33:22.727 --> 0:33:24.727
<v Speaker 2>extreme nature of porn. Well a, i'd be like, how

0:33:24.927 --> 0:33:26.927
<v Speaker 2>they like, I hope so, But I don't know that

0:33:26.927 --> 0:33:30.047
<v Speaker 2>that's true. But like, I think it's a flawed business

0:33:30.047 --> 0:33:32.887
<v Speaker 2>model because I don't think that men have stopped looking

0:33:32.887 --> 0:33:34.847
<v Speaker 2>at naked women, you know what I mean, I just don't.

0:33:35.007 --> 0:33:36.567
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I don't think it's going to work either. But

0:33:36.607 --> 0:33:40.127
<v Speaker 3>all magazines ever were whoever they were for is curation

0:33:40.647 --> 0:33:44.527
<v Speaker 3>of content, and so this is saying that we will

0:33:44.567 --> 0:33:47.447
<v Speaker 3>curate content, and we'll put things about alcohol, and will

0:33:47.487 --> 0:33:50.687
<v Speaker 3>put things. It's talking to a nostalgia in a group

0:33:50.767 --> 0:33:52.447
<v Speaker 3>of men who were gen X men.

0:33:52.567 --> 0:33:55.447
<v Speaker 2>And it's true that it was more socially acceptable. So

0:33:55.527 --> 0:33:58.207
<v Speaker 2>like if you started dating a guy in the nineties

0:33:58.327 --> 0:34:00.687
<v Speaker 2>and you went round to his house and he had

0:34:00.767 --> 0:34:04.207
<v Speaker 2>a copy of Loaded on the table, you wouldn't necessarily

0:34:04.287 --> 0:34:06.927
<v Speaker 2>think he's a disgusting purv.

0:34:07.447 --> 0:34:09.207
<v Speaker 4>You just mean, like, oh, there must be a great

0:34:09.607 --> 0:34:10.687
<v Speaker 4>on climate change in there.

0:34:10.687 --> 0:34:13.647
<v Speaker 2>Whereas if it was a proper hardcore porn mag and

0:34:13.687 --> 0:34:15.487
<v Speaker 2>it was out on the table, that's a different thing,

0:34:15.567 --> 0:34:18.367
<v Speaker 2>you know what I mean, that's the veneer of respectability.

0:34:18.407 --> 0:34:21.487
<v Speaker 2>So I guess the differentiation there now is it's a

0:34:21.487 --> 0:34:24.607
<v Speaker 2>bit like looking at a woman in a bikini on Instagram,

0:34:24.607 --> 0:34:27.527
<v Speaker 2>which we all know that some only fans, I guess

0:34:27.607 --> 0:34:30.127
<v Speaker 2>is a very obvious place for this, right, Just looking

0:34:30.167 --> 0:34:32.767
<v Speaker 2>at a woman in a bikini is exciting. Is that

0:34:32.847 --> 0:34:35.727
<v Speaker 2>a different line if they're actually looking at porn? What's

0:34:35.767 --> 0:34:39.207
<v Speaker 2>your position on that? That's what this differentiation is supposed

0:34:39.207 --> 0:34:39.367
<v Speaker 2>to be.

0:34:39.687 --> 0:34:42.407
<v Speaker 4>I think it's the same. I actually think sometimes it's

0:34:42.447 --> 0:34:44.927
<v Speaker 4>worse because when you're looking on Instagram at a person,

0:34:45.327 --> 0:34:47.847
<v Speaker 4>you know that's a real life person, and you know

0:34:47.927 --> 0:34:50.367
<v Speaker 4>maybe they're posting it to get heaps of life and

0:34:50.487 --> 0:34:53.247
<v Speaker 4>to get heaps of DMS. You also know they're posting

0:34:53.287 --> 0:34:55.847
<v Speaker 4>it because they are a person who just wants to

0:34:55.847 --> 0:34:57.967
<v Speaker 4>post a bikini pig and look good in it. And

0:34:58.007 --> 0:35:00.527
<v Speaker 4>then you like scroll down and you see a fire

0:35:00.567 --> 0:35:03.327
<v Speaker 4>emoji that's ridden by your boyfriend, and it's embarrassing more

0:35:03.327 --> 0:35:06.527
<v Speaker 4>than anything, it's more embarrassing. It's more embarrassing knowing that

0:35:06.607 --> 0:35:09.767
<v Speaker 4>the rest of the world can see your partner engaging

0:35:09.807 --> 0:35:10.767
<v Speaker 4>in this type of content.

0:35:10.847 --> 0:35:14.647
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so it's a way for men to there's plausible deniability,

0:35:14.727 --> 0:35:18.047
<v Speaker 3>right because it's like I've bought Loaded magazine. I bought

0:35:18.087 --> 0:35:20.927
<v Speaker 3>it for the articles, Like you could ostensibly say that,

0:35:21.047 --> 0:35:24.047
<v Speaker 3>whereas if you've just got you just watching porn or

0:35:24.127 --> 0:35:27.487
<v Speaker 3>you're just liking some fitness model's photo, that is more

0:35:27.487 --> 0:35:29.167
<v Speaker 3>personal and that is more specific.

0:35:29.527 --> 0:35:32.127
<v Speaker 2>But you can't police what people think and what they

0:35:32.127 --> 0:35:35.407
<v Speaker 2>want to look at because if he's engaging with that photo,

0:35:35.487 --> 0:35:38.207
<v Speaker 2>so say he's looking at hot bikini model on Instagram

0:35:38.407 --> 0:35:41.287
<v Speaker 2>he likes or fire emoges it he's leaving a breadcrumb

0:35:41.367 --> 0:35:43.847
<v Speaker 2>trail like of what he's into, but you can't police

0:35:43.927 --> 0:35:46.247
<v Speaker 2>him from actually just looking at that and like having

0:35:46.247 --> 0:35:47.927
<v Speaker 2>the thoughts he wants to have in his head. And

0:35:48.447 --> 0:35:49.887
<v Speaker 2>one of the things I worry about. I don't want

0:35:49.887 --> 0:35:51.607
<v Speaker 2>to sound like, you know, that's not my bag to

0:35:51.647 --> 0:35:53.727
<v Speaker 2>be all like, oh PC gone mad, But I'm like,

0:35:54.607 --> 0:35:57.447
<v Speaker 2>we can't be in such a puritanical place where we

0:35:57.567 --> 0:35:59.527
<v Speaker 2>literally don't think people should be allowed to look at

0:35:59.527 --> 0:35:59.887
<v Speaker 2>other people.

0:35:59.887 --> 0:36:01.167
<v Speaker 3>And that's what I was trying to say. Do you

0:36:01.247 --> 0:36:01.607
<v Speaker 3>know what I mean?

0:36:01.727 --> 0:36:01.887
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:36:02.047 --> 0:36:05.567
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, how many times have you been in love? Out louders?

0:36:05.607 --> 0:36:06.767
<v Speaker 3>How many times? Do you've been in love?

0:36:06.847 --> 0:36:07.007
<v Speaker 5>Him?

0:36:07.207 --> 0:36:10.287
<v Speaker 4>Too many times? I don't even know what love is really.

0:36:10.407 --> 0:36:13.447
<v Speaker 4>Maybe I'm confused. I should have been an honest conversation.

0:36:13.927 --> 0:36:14.447
<v Speaker 3>That's interesting.

0:36:14.487 --> 0:36:16.207
<v Speaker 2>I've been in love a few times. I think I

0:36:16.247 --> 0:36:18.087
<v Speaker 2>say that on this because is it three?

0:36:18.247 --> 0:36:20.927
<v Speaker 3>Have you been in love three times? On yesterday's episode,

0:36:21.087 --> 0:36:23.047
<v Speaker 3>Holly and I talked about how many times you've been

0:36:23.047 --> 0:36:25.807
<v Speaker 3>in love? It was very interesting conversation I learned about you,

0:36:25.887 --> 0:36:28.807
<v Speaker 3>hollywayen Right. I think that what you feel is kind

0:36:28.807 --> 0:36:31.447
<v Speaker 3>of a little bit different, maybe with each person or

0:36:31.447 --> 0:36:33.807
<v Speaker 3>maybe it's just then how you look at it in hindsight,

0:36:34.407 --> 0:36:36.527
<v Speaker 3>how you think, Oh I thought it was love, but

0:36:36.567 --> 0:36:38.407
<v Speaker 3>actually it was just lust. Or I thought it was love,

0:36:38.447 --> 0:36:41.687
<v Speaker 3>but actually we should have just been friends. Or I

0:36:41.687 --> 0:36:44.327
<v Speaker 3>don't believe that you just have one love in your life.

0:36:44.447 --> 0:36:46.927
<v Speaker 3>I think that you can have lots.

0:36:47.287 --> 0:36:49.607
<v Speaker 2>I've been in love a few times for sure. This

0:36:49.647 --> 0:36:51.247
<v Speaker 2>is why I think. You know, we always talk about

0:36:51.287 --> 0:36:55.447
<v Speaker 2>Jay Lower, Yes, let's talk about her again. Like she

0:36:55.687 --> 0:36:58.287
<v Speaker 2>says herself in that movie that like she's addicted to love.

0:36:58.367 --> 0:37:00.407
<v Speaker 2>She means that first part. That's what she means.

0:37:00.487 --> 0:37:01.967
<v Speaker 3>What do they call it? Liminence?

0:37:02.127 --> 0:37:06.487
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, liminence, limerence. It's that first part of love where

0:37:06.527 --> 0:37:07.447
<v Speaker 2>you're obsessed.

0:37:08.087 --> 0:37:09.847
<v Speaker 3>A link to that episode will be the show notes.

0:37:09.847 --> 0:37:11.087
<v Speaker 3>You can listen right now.

0:37:11.367 --> 0:37:13.207
<v Speaker 2>And if you are looking for other things to listen to.

0:37:13.767 --> 0:37:16.647
<v Speaker 2>On our other shows this week, on our cheating shows,

0:37:16.967 --> 0:37:19.847
<v Speaker 2>when We're Cheating, on When We're Out Loud on Mid

0:37:19.927 --> 0:37:21.927
<v Speaker 2>this week, I had a conversation about bodies, which is

0:37:21.927 --> 0:37:23.927
<v Speaker 2>we're not allowed to talk about it. I know, we

0:37:24.007 --> 0:37:26.167
<v Speaker 2>broke the taboos on Mid this week, and I have

0:37:26.207 --> 0:37:29.527
<v Speaker 2>a conversation with Helen Thorne, who's this comedian Ouzsie, comedian

0:37:29.567 --> 0:37:31.967
<v Speaker 2>who lives in London, and part of her stick is

0:37:31.967 --> 0:37:34.647
<v Speaker 2>that she and her comedy partner as old A, are

0:37:34.647 --> 0:37:38.527
<v Speaker 2>women since you know, thirties forties, worn these tight lamee

0:37:38.607 --> 0:37:42.567
<v Speaker 2>like catsuits on stage and they were both very like

0:37:42.767 --> 0:37:45.367
<v Speaker 2>ordinarily shaped. Let's just say, you know, like just not

0:37:45.567 --> 0:37:47.167
<v Speaker 2>supermodels and so.

0:37:47.287 --> 0:37:49.767
<v Speaker 3>Bit Celeste Barber. Yeah.

0:37:49.887 --> 0:37:51.687
<v Speaker 2>So the body confidence that it takes to do that

0:37:51.727 --> 0:37:53.807
<v Speaker 2>no matter what shape you are, is one thing. But then

0:37:54.247 --> 0:37:57.327
<v Speaker 2>Helen went through this massive sort of reckoning pre COVID

0:37:57.367 --> 0:37:59.247
<v Speaker 2>where she found out her spitald was cheating on her,

0:37:59.647 --> 0:38:02.247
<v Speaker 2>her marriage fell apart, she went into lockdown, she fell

0:38:02.247 --> 0:38:04.727
<v Speaker 2>into a debauch hole, as she tells lots of funny

0:38:04.727 --> 0:38:09.487
<v Speaker 2>stories about, and then she great rebuilt her relations with

0:38:09.527 --> 0:38:13.567
<v Speaker 2>her body. It's a really good, funny conversation. It's hilarious.

0:38:13.687 --> 0:38:16.367
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, such a good episode. Got I'm enjoying your conversations

0:38:16.407 --> 0:38:21.047
<v Speaker 3>on that show on No Filter this week. Oh I

0:38:21.127 --> 0:38:24.847
<v Speaker 3>had speaking of cheating, I had a fascinating conversation. And

0:38:24.847 --> 0:38:26.887
<v Speaker 3>I don't usually get to say I had an exclusive.

0:38:26.967 --> 0:38:28.967
<v Speaker 3>I didn't mean for it to be one. Sam and

0:38:29.047 --> 0:38:32.447
<v Speaker 3>Nia Rata were in that Ashley Madison documentary. They were

0:38:32.447 --> 0:38:36.207
<v Speaker 3>a couple who were very Christian. They were family like YouTubers,

0:38:36.647 --> 0:38:40.887
<v Speaker 3>and his name was leaked in the Ashley Madison data leak.

0:38:41.687 --> 0:38:43.527
<v Speaker 3>It came out that he had didn't actually have an

0:38:43.527 --> 0:38:46.527
<v Speaker 3>affair via Ashley Madison because all the women on that

0:38:46.527 --> 0:38:51.047
<v Speaker 3>website were actually Botts, but he had been unfaithful over

0:38:51.087 --> 0:38:53.287
<v Speaker 3>a really long period of time with lots of different

0:38:53.287 --> 0:38:55.887
<v Speaker 3>women in lots of different ways. Their story was told

0:38:55.887 --> 0:38:57.927
<v Speaker 3>a little bit in the documentary, but I was interested,

0:38:57.967 --> 0:39:01.287
<v Speaker 3>so we reached out and had an amazing interview. They

0:39:01.287 --> 0:39:04.007
<v Speaker 3>were in their bedroom, side by side. There was this

0:39:04.167 --> 0:39:07.047
<v Speaker 3>big thunderstorm in the background. We're going to be talking

0:39:07.047 --> 0:39:10.047
<v Speaker 3>about it more on Friday because there has been a

0:39:10.527 --> 0:39:12.807
<v Speaker 3>massive reaction to it in a way that I didn't expect.

0:39:13.047 --> 0:39:16.847
<v Speaker 3>People are furious, furious, furious, So we'll put a link

0:39:16.847 --> 0:39:19.007
<v Speaker 3>in the show notes to mid and to No Filter,

0:39:19.367 --> 0:39:21.447
<v Speaker 3>don't forget to listen on Friday when we'll be talking

0:39:21.487 --> 0:39:23.607
<v Speaker 3>about it more in depth. What about you, I, What

0:39:23.647 --> 0:39:25.007
<v Speaker 3>have you been doing this week?

0:39:25.287 --> 0:39:27.447
<v Speaker 4>One of my favorite topics next week was talking about

0:39:27.447 --> 0:39:30.407
<v Speaker 4>Sabrina Carpenter. She's just released a new song.

0:39:30.327 --> 0:39:32.887
<v Speaker 2>I Love It, Please Please Please, talking about.

0:39:32.607 --> 0:39:36.087
<v Speaker 4>The brilliance of her writing a song begging her boyfriend

0:39:36.127 --> 0:39:38.847
<v Speaker 4>not to embarrass her while casting her real life boyfriend

0:39:38.887 --> 0:39:41.887
<v Speaker 4>Barry Kiogan in the music video. We also talked about

0:39:41.887 --> 0:39:45.687
<v Speaker 4>Barry's history and men who leave their partners when they've

0:39:45.687 --> 0:39:46.487
<v Speaker 4>become really famous.

0:39:46.567 --> 0:39:49.407
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, just off him in a big way.

0:39:49.487 --> 0:39:51.047
<v Speaker 4>Yes, Oh, he was the rab boy with the Golden

0:39:51.047 --> 0:39:51.767
<v Speaker 4>Retriever rising.

0:39:53.807 --> 0:39:55.927
<v Speaker 2>A link to all of these episodes will be in

0:39:55.967 --> 0:39:58.687
<v Speaker 2>the show notes. That's it for today, out louders, thank

0:39:58.727 --> 0:40:01.167
<v Speaker 2>you for making it through Wednesday with you, and thank

0:40:01.207 --> 0:40:03.687
<v Speaker 2>you to our wonderful team for making this episode happen.

0:40:04.127 --> 0:40:05.607
<v Speaker 2>We'll be back in here it is tomorrow.

0:40:05.807 --> 0:40:07.167
<v Speaker 4>Bye Bye, Siya.

0:40:08.047 --> 0:40:11.207
<v Speaker 5>Shout out to any Mom and Maya subscribers listening. If

0:40:11.247 --> 0:40:13.847
<v Speaker 5>you love the show and want to support us as well,

0:40:14.007 --> 0:40:16.527
<v Speaker 5>subscribing to MoMA Miya is the very best way to

0:40:16.567 --> 0:40:18.967
<v Speaker 5>do so. There is a link in the episode description.

0:40:22.407 --> 0:40:24.927
<v Speaker 3>I was laughing during that last segment because it's like,

0:40:25.087 --> 0:40:27.767
<v Speaker 3>you think that a magazine is actually a coffee table book.

0:40:29.127 --> 0:40:31.127
<v Speaker 4>I think they're going to display it in their apartment

0:40:31.207 --> 0:40:33.607
<v Speaker 4>like a piece of armor, and then it just has pictures.

0:40:33.767 --> 0:40:36.447
<v Speaker 3>No, the way a magazine works is that there's pictures,

0:40:36.447 --> 0:40:39.447
<v Speaker 3>but also words climate change,