WEBVTT - Trump's 38 Minute Boogie

0:00:21.290 --> 0:00:25.410
<v Speaker 1>So much you're listening to I'm Ama Mia podcast. Mamma

0:00:25.490 --> 0:00:28.650
<v Speaker 1>Mia acknowledges the traditional owners of the land. We have

0:00:28.770 --> 0:00:32.730
<v Speaker 1>recorded this podcast on the Gattigul people of the Eora Nation.

0:00:33.490 --> 0:00:36.290
<v Speaker 1>We pay our respects to their elders past and present,

0:00:36.690 --> 0:00:39.970
<v Speaker 1>and extend that respect to all Aboriginal and torres Rate

0:00:40.010 --> 0:00:40.970
<v Speaker 1>islander cultures.

0:00:44.850 --> 0:00:47.770
<v Speaker 2>A man with multiple guns was arrested outside of former

0:00:47.810 --> 0:00:52.330
<v Speaker 2>President Donald Trump's rally in California Saturday. The local sheriff

0:00:52.370 --> 0:00:55.890
<v Speaker 2>says forty nine year old Van Miller illegally had a shotgun,

0:00:55.970 --> 0:00:59.850
<v Speaker 2>loaded handgun, and a high capacity magazine. Would anybody else

0:00:59.970 --> 0:01:00.450
<v Speaker 2>like defend?

0:01:01.650 --> 0:01:04.490
<v Speaker 3>Please raiser, Let's do it now, Please raise your head.

0:01:04.770 --> 0:01:07.410
<v Speaker 3>You know what we could do though, if my guys

0:01:07.410 --> 0:01:07.930
<v Speaker 3>could do it.

0:01:08.850 --> 0:01:11.170
<v Speaker 2>How about we'll do a little music.

0:01:11.250 --> 0:01:12.490
<v Speaker 3>Let's make this a musical.

0:01:12.530 --> 0:01:12.890
<v Speaker 4>First.

0:01:13.010 --> 0:01:16.650
<v Speaker 3>Oh, looky, looky, Hello out louders. Is that time of

0:01:16.690 --> 0:01:19.050
<v Speaker 3>the week where we unpack all the things that are

0:01:19.050 --> 0:01:22.010
<v Speaker 3>happening in the US election, which is now only a

0:01:22.130 --> 0:01:25.570
<v Speaker 3>terrifying nineteen days away. I'm Holly Wainwright and I have

0:01:25.770 --> 0:01:28.570
<v Speaker 3>literally been in an Internet free zone for a week

0:01:28.650 --> 0:01:30.650
<v Speaker 3>and it's been glorious to not know what's been going

0:01:30.690 --> 0:01:33.730
<v Speaker 3>on with Trump and Harris, but today I'm going to

0:01:33.770 --> 0:01:35.650
<v Speaker 3>find out. We're joined by Jesse Stevens.

0:01:35.810 --> 0:01:38.010
<v Speaker 5>I'm here, and every time I say anything about the

0:01:38.090 --> 0:01:40.050
<v Speaker 5>US election, I go no, I need to get across

0:01:40.050 --> 0:01:42.570
<v Speaker 5>it because I have a built in Amelia Lester, who

0:01:42.770 --> 0:01:44.770
<v Speaker 5>gives me all the context I need to know. She's

0:01:44.850 --> 0:01:45.250
<v Speaker 5>my filter.

0:01:45.530 --> 0:01:48.490
<v Speaker 3>She absolutely is. And Amelia Lester is here. She is

0:01:48.530 --> 0:01:51.410
<v Speaker 3>the deputy editor of Foreign Policy magazine. She is a

0:01:51.490 --> 0:01:53.730
<v Speaker 3>journalist with lots of years of experience in the US.

0:01:53.930 --> 0:01:56.930
<v Speaker 3>In fact, she lived there until very recently. Amelia, what

0:01:56.970 --> 0:02:00.090
<v Speaker 3>the hell is going on in US politics this week?

0:02:00.330 --> 0:02:00.650
<v Speaker 6>Okay?

0:02:00.690 --> 0:02:02.130
<v Speaker 4>The first thing you need to know is that I

0:02:02.170 --> 0:02:04.610
<v Speaker 4>got a text from a friend yesterday, and I'm going

0:02:04.650 --> 0:02:06.490
<v Speaker 4>to read it in its entirety. This is a friend

0:02:06.530 --> 0:02:09.770
<v Speaker 4>in the US. Imagine it's twenty twelve, Barack Obama was

0:02:09.770 --> 0:02:13.130
<v Speaker 4>just reelected, and you receive this article from the future.

0:02:13.250 --> 0:02:15.890
<v Speaker 4>This is an article from the Washington Post. There's nothing

0:02:15.970 --> 0:02:18.890
<v Speaker 4>in this world that could convince you it's real. I

0:02:19.010 --> 0:02:22.490
<v Speaker 4>still don't believe it's a reported story from a real event.

0:02:22.610 --> 0:02:25.770
<v Speaker 4>Would you like to know what I would? I should

0:02:25.770 --> 0:02:28.250
<v Speaker 4>stop and say no, it's no an assassination attempt, though that

0:02:28.290 --> 0:02:33.930
<v Speaker 4>did happen. That's we'll get to that. This is a

0:02:34.050 --> 0:02:38.090
<v Speaker 4>surprising thing. This is the headline. Trump sways and bops

0:02:38.130 --> 0:02:42.930
<v Speaker 4>to music for thirty nine minutes in bizarre episode.

0:02:43.370 --> 0:02:47.530
<v Speaker 5>So, all right, what happened here? Because I've seen tweets

0:02:47.570 --> 0:02:49.330
<v Speaker 5>about it, and sometimes you just look at it and

0:02:49.330 --> 0:02:51.050
<v Speaker 5>you go, oh, I'm sure everyone's exaggerating.

0:02:51.170 --> 0:02:54.690
<v Speaker 4>Yeah. No, I have never read an article in the

0:02:54.730 --> 0:02:59.050
<v Speaker 4>New York Times where the reporter was so clearly confused

0:02:59.890 --> 0:03:02.610
<v Speaker 4>and yet still had to write an article and describe

0:03:02.650 --> 0:03:05.130
<v Speaker 4>what happened. So what happened was Trump was doing a

0:03:05.250 --> 0:03:08.570
<v Speaker 4>rally in you guessed at Pennsylvania because basically that's the

0:03:08.610 --> 0:03:11.330
<v Speaker 4>one state where everyone's going to decide for the next

0:03:11.410 --> 0:03:13.690
<v Speaker 4>couple of weeks. It's deciding the election. He was at

0:03:13.730 --> 0:03:16.450
<v Speaker 4>a town hall in Pennsylvania and then two people needed

0:03:16.450 --> 0:03:20.370
<v Speaker 4>medical attention, which is also not surprising because the median

0:03:20.410 --> 0:03:24.250
<v Speaker 4>age at his rallies tends to be somewhere around seventy five.

0:03:24.610 --> 0:03:27.410
<v Speaker 4>They needed the medical attention, and he was sort of

0:03:27.530 --> 0:03:29.810
<v Speaker 4>waiting to see what happened there, and then he decided

0:03:29.850 --> 0:03:32.370
<v Speaker 4>he wasn't going to talk about small business or the

0:03:32.410 --> 0:03:36.690
<v Speaker 4>economy or inflation anymore. He just wanted to listen to

0:03:36.730 --> 0:03:37.250
<v Speaker 4>some music.

0:03:37.930 --> 0:03:39.610
<v Speaker 5>So he was that that song that he does, where

0:03:39.610 --> 0:03:44.570
<v Speaker 5>he Goes, where he does his little fist was.

0:03:46.210 --> 0:03:50.730
<v Speaker 6>Yes, that that extremely well known song. Yes, yes, y

0:03:50.930 --> 0:03:51.610
<v Speaker 6>m c h.

0:03:52.090 --> 0:03:57.610
<v Speaker 3>Actually to dance to that on the stage and we

0:03:57.690 --> 0:03:59.450
<v Speaker 3>are not dances and we did a better job than

0:03:59.490 --> 0:04:00.250
<v Speaker 3>Donald Trump does.

0:04:00.570 --> 0:04:02.650
<v Speaker 4>Anyway, there was a lot of fist dancing. So for

0:04:02.690 --> 0:04:05.250
<v Speaker 4>thirty nine minutes, Yeah, he played his greatest hits. He

0:04:05.370 --> 0:04:10.610
<v Speaker 4>played Walliam Ca. He played Ave Maria twice. That's a

0:04:10.730 --> 0:04:13.770
<v Speaker 4>down out which which I think is a diagram between

0:04:13.770 --> 0:04:16.890
<v Speaker 4>Donald Trump and Muriel Hesslop is that they both loved

0:04:17.010 --> 0:04:20.130
<v Speaker 4>the song, are they Maria? What's interesting is he come

0:04:20.210 --> 0:04:21.850
<v Speaker 4>play a lot of the songs he wants to play

0:04:21.890 --> 0:04:25.210
<v Speaker 4>these days because artists keep sending him seasoned desists. So

0:04:25.530 --> 0:04:27.490
<v Speaker 4>he used to love the Rolling Stones song you Can't

0:04:27.490 --> 0:04:30.010
<v Speaker 4>Always Get what you Want. They sent him a season desist.

0:04:30.450 --> 0:04:33.250
<v Speaker 4>James Brown, it's a man's man's man's well.

0:04:33.290 --> 0:04:34.490
<v Speaker 3>That would be a big time.

0:04:35.810 --> 0:04:39.170
<v Speaker 4>Saneade O'Connor performing. Nothing compares to you now, I know.

0:04:39.290 --> 0:04:44.130
<v Speaker 4>If there's one politician shinetdo kinda loves. It's absolutely Donald.

0:04:43.770 --> 0:04:45.970
<v Speaker 3>Trump spinning in her grave speak.

0:04:46.490 --> 0:04:47.530
<v Speaker 6>Yes, sorry past tense.

0:04:47.610 --> 0:04:50.130
<v Speaker 4>Yes. So anyway, it was a really odd episode. No

0:04:50.210 --> 0:04:52.410
<v Speaker 4>one really knows what to make of it. But he

0:04:52.490 --> 0:04:54.930
<v Speaker 4>had another odd episode this week because he was at

0:04:54.970 --> 0:04:59.770
<v Speaker 4>a rally in Arizona and he said that he wanted

0:04:59.810 --> 0:05:03.850
<v Speaker 4>to thank We think he was saying Assyrians for Trump,

0:05:04.050 --> 0:05:05.930
<v Speaker 4>but he said in such a way that it's sounded

0:05:05.970 --> 0:05:09.410
<v Speaker 4>like Ascerasians, and no one really know what he meant, and.

0:05:09.370 --> 0:05:10.770
<v Speaker 6>So there were various theories.

0:05:10.850 --> 0:05:13.250
<v Speaker 4>People said, could he have meant Arizonans, could he have

0:05:13.330 --> 0:05:18.210
<v Speaker 4>meant Azerbaijan's. But then eventually the case was cracked. There

0:05:18.410 --> 0:05:20.130
<v Speaker 4>was a group of people in red T shirts that

0:05:20.130 --> 0:05:23.010
<v Speaker 4>read us for Trump. Assyrians are of course an ancient

0:05:23.090 --> 0:05:27.530
<v Speaker 4>people who trace their roots to Northern Iraq, Syria, Turkey,

0:05:27.570 --> 0:05:30.770
<v Speaker 4>and Iran. The Facebook group Assyrians for Trump only has

0:05:30.770 --> 0:05:33.650
<v Speaker 4>one hundred and thirty six members, so it's not a

0:05:33.770 --> 0:05:36.810
<v Speaker 4>hugely important swing group in this selection.

0:05:36.970 --> 0:05:38.010
<v Speaker 6>He's clashing it through us.

0:05:38.050 --> 0:05:40.290
<v Speaker 3>So I've seen a lot of people say that this

0:05:40.530 --> 0:05:43.970
<v Speaker 3>is further evidence of his cognitive decline. Other people are

0:05:43.970 --> 0:05:45.810
<v Speaker 3>saying he didn't like the questions that were being asked.

0:05:45.850 --> 0:05:48.490
<v Speaker 3>Others are saying he's avoiding making gaffes like my numbers

0:05:48.530 --> 0:05:50.570
<v Speaker 3>with the black and especially black men.

0:05:50.690 --> 0:05:56.690
<v Speaker 4>I love black men, I love them, I love them.

0:05:55.890 --> 0:06:00.370
<v Speaker 3>I have gone through the roof with black men. Yes,

0:06:00.490 --> 0:06:04.290
<v Speaker 3>and Kamala Harris just I understand it, tweeted, I hope

0:06:04.290 --> 0:06:09.450
<v Speaker 3>he's okay after the dancing and swaying, I think is understated.

0:06:09.770 --> 0:06:11.250
<v Speaker 3>So what's the black men's speech?

0:06:11.290 --> 0:06:12.090
<v Speaker 6>What's happened there?

0:06:12.290 --> 0:06:15.410
<v Speaker 4>If the question hollywoods is Donald Trump? Okay, I wasn't

0:06:15.410 --> 0:06:17.370
<v Speaker 4>going to be able to answer that one. So I'm

0:06:17.370 --> 0:06:20.170
<v Speaker 4>glad Jesse to follow up hurry so on the black

0:06:20.210 --> 0:06:23.290
<v Speaker 4>men's seech. So what happened here is that Obama spoke

0:06:23.450 --> 0:06:27.530
<v Speaker 4>in Pittsburgh, which is a city in Pennsylvania, last week,

0:06:27.690 --> 0:06:30.770
<v Speaker 4>and he aimed his speech very much at black men.

0:06:30.930 --> 0:06:34.250
<v Speaker 4>And the reason he did that is because Kamala Harris's

0:06:34.330 --> 0:06:37.970
<v Speaker 4>support is still very low among black voters in Pennsylvania.

0:06:38.010 --> 0:06:40.330
<v Speaker 4>It's lower than when Biden won the state in twenty twenty,

0:06:40.370 --> 0:06:43.770
<v Speaker 4>according to polls, and Obama still has enormous appeal both

0:06:43.770 --> 0:06:46.770
<v Speaker 4>in this community but also more generally amongst Democrats. Polls

0:06:46.770 --> 0:06:50.650
<v Speaker 4>show ninety percent of Democrats still view him favorably and Harris.

0:06:50.770 --> 0:06:53.250
<v Speaker 4>This is interesting, was an early supporter of Obama. Said,

0:06:53.290 --> 0:06:55.410
<v Speaker 4>you know that she daw knocked for him in Iowa

0:06:55.490 --> 0:06:57.810
<v Speaker 4>in two thousand and seven when he was running to

0:06:57.850 --> 0:06:59.090
<v Speaker 4>be the Democratic nominee.

0:06:59.090 --> 0:06:59.970
<v Speaker 6>So they go way back.

0:07:00.410 --> 0:07:02.410
<v Speaker 4>But in this speech, people have said this was a

0:07:02.490 --> 0:07:06.570
<v Speaker 4>risky move on Obama's part. He addressed his brothers. That's

0:07:06.570 --> 0:07:08.690
<v Speaker 4>a quote. He said, you're coming up with all kinds

0:07:08.730 --> 0:07:12.090
<v Speaker 4>of reasons and excuses for not supporting Kamala Harris. Part

0:07:12.090 --> 0:07:14.010
<v Speaker 4>of it makes me think that you're just not feeling

0:07:14.010 --> 0:07:17.090
<v Speaker 4>the idea of having a woman as president. And a

0:07:17.210 --> 0:07:20.330
<v Speaker 4>number of commentators have described this as at the tone

0:07:20.370 --> 0:07:24.730
<v Speaker 4>here a little bit off, a little sterldie Scoldie Wendell Pearce,

0:07:24.810 --> 0:07:28.490
<v Speaker 4>who is an actor who was in Suits and the Wire,

0:07:29.250 --> 0:07:32.810
<v Speaker 4>more to the point, the critically acclaimed Kenzie and Drama.

0:07:32.890 --> 0:07:34.330
<v Speaker 6>He was in Suits with Megan Markle.

0:07:34.770 --> 0:07:37.290
<v Speaker 4>He went on social media and he wrote, the party

0:07:37.330 --> 0:07:40.250
<v Speaker 4>has to stop scapegoating black men. That was particularly notable

0:07:40.290 --> 0:07:43.250
<v Speaker 4>for him because he's been a big supporter of Kamala

0:07:43.250 --> 0:07:45.930
<v Speaker 4>Harris's run for president, and he asked why white men

0:07:45.970 --> 0:07:48.570
<v Speaker 4>and women weren't getting the same treatment. And Obama has

0:07:48.650 --> 0:07:51.210
<v Speaker 4>history on this because in two thousand and eight, when

0:07:51.250 --> 0:07:54.850
<v Speaker 4>he was the Democratic nominee, he scolded black fathers. He

0:07:54.930 --> 0:07:57.210
<v Speaker 4>told a group of black people during a speech in Chicago,

0:07:57.650 --> 0:08:01.010
<v Speaker 4>we need fathers to realize that responsibility does not end

0:08:01.010 --> 0:08:04.730
<v Speaker 4>at conception, addressing this idea that in the black community

0:08:05.050 --> 0:08:07.930
<v Speaker 4>sometimes black fathers aren't always around. So there was this

0:08:08.090 --> 0:08:11.850
<v Speaker 4>history with Obama on this, and I think in that context,

0:08:11.890 --> 0:08:14.530
<v Speaker 4>Trump sort of tried to seize on the moment and

0:08:14.610 --> 0:08:16.250
<v Speaker 4>declare that he loves black men.

0:08:17.090 --> 0:08:20.010
<v Speaker 5>I feel like that was on his notepad, not but

0:08:20.050 --> 0:08:24.090
<v Speaker 5>he has a notepad, but like black men potential. And

0:08:24.130 --> 0:08:26.250
<v Speaker 5>then it sounds like he didn't really nut out what

0:08:26.690 --> 0:08:28.970
<v Speaker 5>he wanted to say about that, so he just yelled

0:08:28.970 --> 0:08:29.410
<v Speaker 5>black men.

0:08:29.570 --> 0:08:29.810
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

0:08:29.890 --> 0:08:33.210
<v Speaker 4>I mean it's I hate Taylor Swift, I love black men.

0:08:33.330 --> 0:08:35.170
<v Speaker 6>It tends to be a pendulum for him.

0:08:35.610 --> 0:08:37.690
<v Speaker 3>None of this seems to be changing the poles so far.

0:08:37.810 --> 0:08:42.050
<v Speaker 3>I know. I ask you this every week. Is anything

0:08:42.130 --> 0:08:44.450
<v Speaker 3>we can hold on to? So much seems to happen,

0:08:44.450 --> 0:08:47.410
<v Speaker 3>and yet nothing seems to change. Because last week I

0:08:47.490 --> 0:08:49.650
<v Speaker 3>listened to you on Mama Mia out loud while I

0:08:49.690 --> 0:08:52.610
<v Speaker 3>wasn't here, talking about Kamala's press blitz. Call her daddy.

0:08:53.010 --> 0:08:53.890
<v Speaker 3>Did it do anything?

0:08:54.010 --> 0:08:56.570
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, the press plits is interesting. So the short answer

0:08:56.610 --> 0:08:58.970
<v Speaker 4>is no, the poles haven't changed much. But it's worth

0:08:58.970 --> 0:09:01.290
<v Speaker 4>talking about the press blitz because now there's a report

0:09:01.410 --> 0:09:04.170
<v Speaker 4>that Kamala Harris is considering or in negotiations to go

0:09:04.210 --> 0:09:06.290
<v Speaker 4>on Joe Rogan's podcast.

0:09:06.610 --> 0:09:09.090
<v Speaker 5>That listen to our debscriber episode last week, but we

0:09:09.130 --> 0:09:11.330
<v Speaker 5>said you need to go on Joe Rogan and she

0:09:11.570 --> 0:09:13.210
<v Speaker 5>brought that to her team.

0:09:13.370 --> 0:09:15.410
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think that they did listen to that. So

0:09:15.730 --> 0:09:17.570
<v Speaker 4>the strategy at work here is that I think that

0:09:17.570 --> 0:09:20.410
<v Speaker 4>they're trying to reach as many persuadable voters as possible

0:09:20.930 --> 0:09:24.490
<v Speaker 4>through outlets that people feel genuinely connected to. And what's

0:09:24.490 --> 0:09:26.330
<v Speaker 4>interesting is she was on the cover of Vogue. The

0:09:26.370 --> 0:09:29.290
<v Speaker 4>cover came out this weekend. It was very subdued, a

0:09:29.290 --> 0:09:31.210
<v Speaker 4>big contrast to the last time she was on the

0:09:31.210 --> 0:09:33.130
<v Speaker 4>cover of Vogue when she became the vice president. You

0:09:33.170 --> 0:09:35.530
<v Speaker 4>might remember that that cover came under some criticism for

0:09:35.570 --> 0:09:38.170
<v Speaker 4>the styling. She was wearing Converse. There was kind of

0:09:38.170 --> 0:09:40.930
<v Speaker 4>some draped fabrics behind her. People thought that it looked

0:09:40.970 --> 0:09:44.410
<v Speaker 4>disrespectful and not fully elegant enough for her office. This

0:09:44.570 --> 0:09:48.010
<v Speaker 4>was a very classic, elegant, sort of politician y cover

0:09:48.090 --> 0:09:50.290
<v Speaker 4>of Vogue, and it sank without a trace.

0:09:50.570 --> 0:09:52.210
<v Speaker 6>Did you even hear anything about it?

0:09:52.530 --> 0:09:53.930
<v Speaker 3>Nah, it was a pretty boring cover.

0:09:54.170 --> 0:09:56.530
<v Speaker 5>I looked at the cover and it was exactly what

0:09:56.570 --> 0:09:59.050
<v Speaker 5>you It's like if an Ai put together a Yeah,

0:09:59.290 --> 0:10:00.530
<v Speaker 5>it must be of what they do.

0:10:00.690 --> 0:10:04.050
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it must be a tricky line to walk, because

0:10:04.130 --> 0:10:06.330
<v Speaker 3>you could have made a cover that would have gone viral,

0:10:06.490 --> 0:10:09.690
<v Speaker 3>but it probably would have had to be. She's been

0:10:09.730 --> 0:10:12.530
<v Speaker 3>styled a different way, her hairs up, she's wearing a

0:10:12.730 --> 0:10:15.210
<v Speaker 3>ball gown, and then that would have attracted. So it's

0:10:15.290 --> 0:10:17.650
<v Speaker 3>kind of like a small target cover. But then it's

0:10:17.730 --> 0:10:19.370
<v Speaker 3>anny point doing a small.

0:10:19.170 --> 0:10:22.770
<v Speaker 4>Target because I think that call her Daddy appearance was

0:10:22.810 --> 0:10:26.130
<v Speaker 4>seen as so revolutionary and clever. Is because the biggest

0:10:26.130 --> 0:10:28.450
<v Speaker 4>sense that undecided voters have about her is that they

0:10:28.490 --> 0:10:31.530
<v Speaker 4>don't know her. That's what they keep telling polsters, and

0:10:31.570 --> 0:10:33.530
<v Speaker 4>they're not going to get to know her more from

0:10:33.570 --> 0:10:36.450
<v Speaker 4>a super stage any leave of its Vogue cover. They

0:10:36.530 --> 0:10:38.450
<v Speaker 4>need to hear her in a kind of long form

0:10:38.530 --> 0:10:41.690
<v Speaker 4>podcast setting and Joe Rogan. It's a smart choice for her.

0:10:42.050 --> 0:10:44.450
<v Speaker 4>Harris needs Rogan more than the other way around. Seems

0:10:44.490 --> 0:10:45.330
<v Speaker 4>to be the general consent.

0:10:45.330 --> 0:10:47.330
<v Speaker 3>And I also hear she's got on Fox News.

0:10:47.570 --> 0:10:51.010
<v Speaker 4>Yes, which is also smart because Pete Boudajed, who's a

0:10:51.050 --> 0:10:53.650
<v Speaker 4>surrogate for the campaign and also in Biden's cabinet, goes

0:10:53.650 --> 0:10:56.370
<v Speaker 4>on Fox News all the time. And people say that's

0:10:56.410 --> 0:10:58.650
<v Speaker 4>why he's been able to sort of hone his messaging.

0:10:58.650 --> 0:11:00.490
<v Speaker 4>He's seen as sort of the greatest communicator in the

0:11:00.490 --> 0:11:02.690
<v Speaker 4>Democratic Party right now, and it's probably because he's been

0:11:02.770 --> 0:11:05.330
<v Speaker 4>consistently forced to talk to people who disagree with him.

0:11:05.410 --> 0:11:09.890
<v Speaker 3>It's a bit late, Kamala three weeks ago, baby.

0:11:09.970 --> 0:11:13.810
<v Speaker 5>Go back to what is if it's my correct count

0:11:14.050 --> 0:11:18.650
<v Speaker 5>the third assassination attempt, which the reporting popped up for

0:11:18.730 --> 0:11:20.570
<v Speaker 5>five minutes and then seem to disappear.

0:11:20.810 --> 0:11:23.770
<v Speaker 4>I just isn't this extraordinary? It sort of goes along

0:11:23.770 --> 0:11:25.650
<v Speaker 4>with the theme of this episode, I think, which is

0:11:25.690 --> 0:11:28.690
<v Speaker 4>if you'd told someone in twenty twelve that the presidential

0:11:28.730 --> 0:11:32.010
<v Speaker 4>nominee had had three assassination attempts and we're not even

0:11:32.050 --> 0:11:34.690
<v Speaker 4>talking about it, it kind of sums it all up.

0:11:34.770 --> 0:11:37.850
<v Speaker 4>I think people are pretty skeptical about this assassination attempt.

0:11:37.850 --> 0:11:41.330
<v Speaker 4>I've noticed that most news outlets are putting assassination attempt

0:11:41.330 --> 0:11:44.010
<v Speaker 4>in quote marks. The facts are that a man, a

0:11:44.010 --> 0:11:47.130
<v Speaker 4>forty nine year old man Van Miller, was arrested outside

0:11:47.130 --> 0:11:49.970
<v Speaker 4>a Trump rally in California's Coachella Valley.

0:11:50.050 --> 0:11:50.970
<v Speaker 6>Yes, that Coachella.

0:11:51.450 --> 0:11:54.570
<v Speaker 4>The sheriff said, I truly do believe we prevented another

0:11:54.650 --> 0:11:58.970
<v Speaker 4>assassination attempt. The Secret Service disagrees with that. Miller himself

0:11:59.010 --> 0:12:01.570
<v Speaker 4>said that the claim he was an assassin was complete bullshit.

0:12:01.650 --> 0:12:03.810
<v Speaker 4>Now maybe that's what he would say, but it is

0:12:03.890 --> 0:12:06.730
<v Speaker 4>just an interesting data point. Basically, what happened was he

0:12:06.810 --> 0:12:09.530
<v Speaker 4>had a phony press passed in an unregistered car and

0:12:09.570 --> 0:12:11.410
<v Speaker 4>he was stopped trying to enter the rally. When the

0:12:11.450 --> 0:12:14.450
<v Speaker 4>police searched the vehicle, they found a shotgun, a loaded handgun,

0:12:14.490 --> 0:12:17.610
<v Speaker 4>all sorts of guns. My view on this, it's not

0:12:17.730 --> 0:12:20.330
<v Speaker 4>surprising that a forty nine year old man going to

0:12:20.370 --> 0:12:22.650
<v Speaker 4>a rally in the middle of the desert has a

0:12:22.650 --> 0:12:24.530
<v Speaker 4>lot of guns in his car. I don't think that

0:12:24.610 --> 0:12:27.370
<v Speaker 4>necessarily proves he wanted to use the guns on Donald Trump.

0:12:27.450 --> 0:12:30.010
<v Speaker 4>Keep in mind, forty eight percent of Republicans report they

0:12:30.050 --> 0:12:32.770
<v Speaker 4>own at least one gun, sixty six percent say they

0:12:32.770 --> 0:12:35.570
<v Speaker 4>live in a household with a gun, and culturally that's

0:12:35.570 --> 0:12:38.210
<v Speaker 4>sort of become a Republican badge of honor? Is this

0:12:38.290 --> 0:12:40.290
<v Speaker 4>idea that I own a gun, I'm not afraid to

0:12:40.370 --> 0:12:41.970
<v Speaker 4>use a gun. I don't think you can make the

0:12:42.050 --> 0:12:43.250
<v Speaker 4>leap there. No.

0:12:44.050 --> 0:12:47.730
<v Speaker 5>I have a question from an out louder named Georgie,

0:12:47.850 --> 0:12:51.290
<v Speaker 5>who has asked, I want to know what actually will

0:12:51.370 --> 0:12:55.050
<v Speaker 5>change for women in America if Trump or Harris gets in,

0:12:55.130 --> 0:12:58.090
<v Speaker 5>because she says with all this fake news, she can't

0:12:58.090 --> 0:13:03.210
<v Speaker 5>separate fact from fiction, will it tangibly impact the lives

0:13:03.210 --> 0:13:03.570
<v Speaker 5>of women?

0:13:04.130 --> 0:13:07.130
<v Speaker 4>Georgie, that's a really good question. I think there's two

0:13:07.290 --> 0:13:10.170
<v Speaker 4>buckets here. The first bucket is abortion, and then the

0:13:10.210 --> 0:13:14.290
<v Speaker 4>second bucket is the economy. Generally first on abortion, we

0:13:14.370 --> 0:13:17.210
<v Speaker 4>don't know what Trump's going to do. At various points,

0:13:17.210 --> 0:13:20.970
<v Speaker 4>He's said he will sign a nationwide abortion van various

0:13:20.970 --> 0:13:24.730
<v Speaker 4>points he said he won't. JD Vanns's vice presidential candidate,

0:13:24.730 --> 0:13:27.730
<v Speaker 4>has said similar contradictory things about what he wants to do.

0:13:28.370 --> 0:13:30.850
<v Speaker 4>The fact is about half of American women right now

0:13:30.970 --> 0:13:33.690
<v Speaker 4>can't really get an abortion if they want one, or

0:13:33.690 --> 0:13:37.290
<v Speaker 4>at least not easily. If Harris got in. She has

0:13:37.330 --> 0:13:40.330
<v Speaker 4>said that she'd like to expand that out to more people. Again,

0:13:41.090 --> 0:13:43.130
<v Speaker 4>she legislatively would find that difficult.

0:13:43.250 --> 0:13:45.090
<v Speaker 3>Just going to say could she do that, she can't

0:13:45.130 --> 0:13:47.450
<v Speaker 3>promise to re state she can't.

0:13:47.690 --> 0:13:50.530
<v Speaker 4>So I think with a Harris administration, you'll see the

0:13:50.530 --> 0:13:54.210
<v Speaker 4>status quo on abortion. With a Trump administration, it is.

0:13:54.410 --> 0:13:56.770
<v Speaker 4>I think it's reasonably likely that they will do what

0:13:56.850 --> 0:13:59.730
<v Speaker 4>they can to further restrict abortion access. Whether that means

0:13:59.850 --> 0:14:02.690
<v Speaker 4>nationwide abortion man, I don't know, because that is pretty

0:14:02.730 --> 0:14:06.610
<v Speaker 4>extreme vement for them. But Republicans have talked about minimizing

0:14:06.690 --> 0:14:10.330
<v Speaker 4>access to contraception and also making it.

0:14:10.250 --> 0:14:12.810
<v Speaker 6>Harder to receive the so called abortion.

0:14:12.610 --> 0:14:14.570
<v Speaker 4>Bill through the mail, which is what a lot of

0:14:14.610 --> 0:14:16.970
<v Speaker 4>American women do as a work around now when they

0:14:16.970 --> 0:14:21.370
<v Speaker 4>can't access abortion care in their state abortion. I do

0:14:21.450 --> 0:14:24.450
<v Speaker 4>think that there's some real extremist measures that we could

0:14:24.490 --> 0:14:27.330
<v Speaker 4>see under a Trump administration. Under a Harris administration, I

0:14:27.330 --> 0:14:29.690
<v Speaker 4>don't think we could see much change in terms of

0:14:29.770 --> 0:14:33.690
<v Speaker 4>getting more women access to abortion. On the economy, I

0:14:33.730 --> 0:14:36.330
<v Speaker 4>think both candidates have talked about the need to make

0:14:36.450 --> 0:14:37.970
<v Speaker 4>child came more affordable, things like this.

0:14:38.050 --> 0:14:39.450
<v Speaker 6>I doubt any of that will happen.

0:14:39.490 --> 0:14:41.370
<v Speaker 4>To be honest, the federal government in the US can

0:14:41.410 --> 0:14:43.770
<v Speaker 4>only do so much on the economy. I do think

0:14:43.810 --> 0:14:46.930
<v Speaker 4>Trump wants to implement some pretty sweeping reforms that are

0:14:46.970 --> 0:14:50.010
<v Speaker 4>going to make consumer goods just hugely more expensive. So

0:14:50.130 --> 0:14:53.170
<v Speaker 4>that's going to impact women and the economy as a whole.

0:14:53.690 --> 0:14:56.290
<v Speaker 4>He wants to start more trade wars with China and others.

0:14:56.610 --> 0:14:59.410
<v Speaker 4>It's going to be a volatile time economically, and that

0:14:59.490 --> 0:15:03.290
<v Speaker 4>will have real implications for American women and also Australian women.

0:15:03.330 --> 0:15:05.690
<v Speaker 4>By the way, Beyond that, I think those are the

0:15:05.690 --> 0:15:06.290
<v Speaker 4>two buckets.

0:15:06.530 --> 0:15:09.450
<v Speaker 3>Another out Louder has a question. Lenny writes, I would

0:15:09.530 --> 0:15:12.450
<v Speaker 3>like to get under the backstory of Trump wants donating

0:15:12.530 --> 0:15:12.970
<v Speaker 3>to come on.

0:15:13.330 --> 0:15:15.730
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, thanks for this, Lenny, because this actually caused me

0:15:15.770 --> 0:15:17.810
<v Speaker 4>to look into Trump's political history.

0:15:18.170 --> 0:15:19.210
<v Speaker 6>Did you know that he.

0:15:19.770 --> 0:15:22.770
<v Speaker 4>Was going to run for president in nineteen ninety nine,

0:15:22.810 --> 0:15:25.450
<v Speaker 4>two thousand as an independent party?

0:15:25.610 --> 0:15:27.850
<v Speaker 5>Yes, yes, I vaguely remember this.

0:15:28.130 --> 0:15:30.130
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I completely forgot about that.

0:15:30.290 --> 0:15:32.330
<v Speaker 3>So he threatened to run for president quite a few

0:15:32.330 --> 0:15:33.650
<v Speaker 3>times before he actually did it.

0:15:33.730 --> 0:15:36.210
<v Speaker 4>He did, but he got quite close in ninety nine,

0:15:36.250 --> 0:15:39.170
<v Speaker 4>two thousand. As I say, he was an independent candidate there.

0:15:39.170 --> 0:15:41.090
<v Speaker 4>It's very much a two party system in the US,

0:15:41.130 --> 0:15:42.810
<v Speaker 4>so there's no way he would have won but it's

0:15:42.810 --> 0:15:45.530
<v Speaker 4>interesting to note then he was a registered Democrat. So

0:15:45.570 --> 0:15:48.770
<v Speaker 4>in the US, when you register to vote, you need

0:15:48.810 --> 0:15:51.130
<v Speaker 4>to declare whether you're a Democrat or a Republican. You

0:15:51.170 --> 0:15:54.250
<v Speaker 4>can declare as not affiliated, which is what journalists like

0:15:54.250 --> 0:15:56.410
<v Speaker 4>myself tend to do, but the default is that you

0:15:56.530 --> 0:15:58.490
<v Speaker 4>declare for one party or the other. So with that

0:15:58.570 --> 0:16:02.090
<v Speaker 4>in mind, from two thousand to twenty eleven he was

0:16:02.090 --> 0:16:05.330
<v Speaker 4>a registered Democrat, which is not at all surprising. He

0:16:05.730 --> 0:16:08.170
<v Speaker 4>lived in New York City, where the vast majority of people,

0:16:08.250 --> 0:16:11.730
<v Speaker 4>particularly even the wealthiest people there, tend to be Democrats.

0:16:12.250 --> 0:16:16.450
<v Speaker 4>He moved in social circles with the Clintons. Milania appeared

0:16:16.490 --> 0:16:18.130
<v Speaker 4>on the cover of Vogue when they got married in

0:16:18.130 --> 0:16:20.370
<v Speaker 4>two thousand and six. That's notable because an a Winter

0:16:20.930 --> 0:16:23.770
<v Speaker 4>editor is a huge Democratic sarrogate and would not have

0:16:23.810 --> 0:16:25.770
<v Speaker 4>put Millennia on the cover if there was any hint

0:16:25.770 --> 0:16:29.810
<v Speaker 4>of Republicanism there. In twenty eleven, he did re register

0:16:29.930 --> 0:16:32.890
<v Speaker 4>as a Republican that same year, though he cut a

0:16:32.930 --> 0:16:36.210
<v Speaker 4>five thousand dollars check for Kamala Harris's reelection campaign to

0:16:36.210 --> 0:16:39.650
<v Speaker 4>be California's Attorney General. The backstory on that is Fox

0:16:39.650 --> 0:16:43.610
<v Speaker 4>News discovered that he wrote this check to attendee fundraising

0:16:43.650 --> 0:16:47.850
<v Speaker 4>dinner for Harris, which Avanka Trump attended, and then Avanka

0:16:48.010 --> 0:16:51.010
<v Speaker 4>actually donated again in twenty fourteen to Harris.

0:16:51.170 --> 0:16:53.090
<v Speaker 5>Why hasn't that been made a bigger deal of.

0:16:53.450 --> 0:16:56.730
<v Speaker 4>Because I think everyone knows that avunka politically had never

0:16:56.770 --> 0:16:59.530
<v Speaker 4>really agreed with her father, but then when along in

0:16:59.570 --> 0:17:01.970
<v Speaker 4>a naked power grab when he did get into office.

0:17:02.370 --> 0:17:05.530
<v Speaker 4>Some people have joked that Harris should spend that money

0:17:05.650 --> 0:17:08.170
<v Speaker 4>that he gave her there on her presidential campaign. Now

0:17:08.770 --> 0:17:12.490
<v Speaker 4>it's not possible. The Sacramento b which is a California newspaper,

0:17:12.570 --> 0:17:15.290
<v Speaker 4>reported in twenty twenty that she'd actually given away the

0:17:15.450 --> 0:17:19.050
<v Speaker 4>entire six thousand dollars he'd given her when she began

0:17:19.090 --> 0:17:21.450
<v Speaker 4>her run for the US Senate because she knew already

0:17:21.490 --> 0:17:23.450
<v Speaker 4>at that point this was toxic money, and she gave

0:17:23.450 --> 0:17:26.610
<v Speaker 4>it to a civil rights nonprofit working in Central America, which.

0:17:26.450 --> 0:17:28.650
<v Speaker 6>Is a nice bowl. On top of this whole story.

0:17:28.450 --> 0:17:31.890
<v Speaker 3>That's really interesting, not because I'm surprised that Trump was

0:17:32.210 --> 0:17:34.290
<v Speaker 3>a Democrat, because I don't believe he gives a shit

0:17:34.330 --> 0:17:37.170
<v Speaker 3>about anything except for Trump so his swing with the breeze,

0:17:37.490 --> 0:17:39.970
<v Speaker 3>but he loves to say what a mess she made

0:17:40.010 --> 0:17:43.250
<v Speaker 3>of California and how California is as attorney general, and

0:17:43.250 --> 0:17:45.690
<v Speaker 3>that how it's a cesspool, and it's like, well, you

0:17:45.770 --> 0:17:47.330
<v Speaker 3>thought at one point she was a good thing.

0:17:47.570 --> 0:17:48.530
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, exactly.

0:17:48.610 --> 0:17:51.810
<v Speaker 4>And it also hits on something which Australian listeners may

0:17:51.850 --> 0:17:54.490
<v Speaker 4>not be aware of, which is that in the US,

0:17:54.610 --> 0:17:57.290
<v Speaker 4>because it's so much more polarized. If you are a

0:17:57.370 --> 0:18:00.130
<v Speaker 4>rich person living in New York, you are a Democrat.

0:18:00.250 --> 0:18:02.770
<v Speaker 4>It's not like here where the sort of like moneyed

0:18:02.890 --> 0:18:05.890
<v Speaker 4>end of town won't really tell you who they're voting for.

0:18:06.970 --> 0:18:08.810
<v Speaker 4>It's out in the open for him to live in

0:18:08.850 --> 0:18:10.690
<v Speaker 4>New York as long as he did and to be

0:18:10.770 --> 0:18:14.930
<v Speaker 4>moving in the vogue circles. By definition, he's a Democrat.

0:18:15.010 --> 0:18:17.290
<v Speaker 4>So that's what made his run for office all the

0:18:17.330 --> 0:18:18.730
<v Speaker 4>more shocking and surprising.

0:18:18.970 --> 0:18:19.970
<v Speaker 3>And why he lives in Florida.

0:18:20.050 --> 0:18:21.050
<v Speaker 6>Why he lives in Florida.

0:18:21.090 --> 0:18:25.250
<v Speaker 5>Now, Charlotte asked this question, which I am wondering too,

0:18:25.290 --> 0:18:27.730
<v Speaker 5>because we are two and a half weeks out from

0:18:27.890 --> 0:18:31.730
<v Speaker 5>the people going and voting. She asks, how long until

0:18:31.730 --> 0:18:34.930
<v Speaker 5>we will know before the final electoral college count?

0:18:35.050 --> 0:18:40.370
<v Speaker 6>Oh, Charlotte, Charlotte, I'm not that smart. I wish I knew.

0:18:40.610 --> 0:18:43.330
<v Speaker 4>I mean, one thing's for sure, you were not going

0:18:43.370 --> 0:18:46.410
<v Speaker 4>to know on election night. We haven't known on election

0:18:46.490 --> 0:18:49.650
<v Speaker 4>night the last few elections, So that's do you know.

0:18:49.570 --> 0:18:50.370
<v Speaker 6>The next stage?

0:18:50.410 --> 0:18:52.850
<v Speaker 5>And like, how does it normally go? Because I forget

0:18:52.850 --> 0:18:54.010
<v Speaker 5>this every election.

0:18:53.810 --> 0:18:56.010
<v Speaker 3>But except remind me because you say we didn't know,

0:18:56.210 --> 0:18:59.530
<v Speaker 3>and we didn't. But remember that horrible day in twenty

0:18:59.570 --> 0:19:02.970
<v Speaker 3>sixteen with the New York Times needle, which was election

0:19:03.170 --> 0:19:06.970
<v Speaker 3>Day where everybody thought. I remember even here, we were

0:19:06.970 --> 0:19:08.930
<v Speaker 3>all obsessed with that needle on the front of the

0:19:09.530 --> 0:19:11.410
<v Speaker 3>right and they were counting out and obviously it's not

0:19:11.450 --> 0:19:14.810
<v Speaker 3>the final vote count, but obviously there was enough momentum

0:19:14.850 --> 0:19:19.210
<v Speaker 3>in the Trump direction that it wasn't. Everybody started crying.

0:19:19.770 --> 0:19:23.010
<v Speaker 3>Obviously the next election was much tighter, took longer.

0:19:23.170 --> 0:19:25.530
<v Speaker 4>And then we've talked on this very podcast about the

0:19:25.570 --> 0:19:28.490
<v Speaker 4>two thousand election which the Supreme Court had to settle,

0:19:28.530 --> 0:19:31.290
<v Speaker 4>which came down to five hundred votes. Yes, so yeah,

0:19:31.330 --> 0:19:33.570
<v Speaker 4>you're right, Holly, maybe we will know an election night,

0:19:33.650 --> 0:19:36.450
<v Speaker 4>but given how close the polls are this time, they're

0:19:36.490 --> 0:19:39.370
<v Speaker 4>even closer than they were in twenty twenty, so it

0:19:39.450 --> 0:19:42.450
<v Speaker 4>seems pretty unlikely. And I'm not going to get into

0:19:42.450 --> 0:19:44.650
<v Speaker 4>the details here because I've been told they're boring by

0:19:44.690 --> 0:19:45.570
<v Speaker 4>me or and I think.

0:19:45.370 --> 0:19:46.370
<v Speaker 6>She's probably right.

0:19:46.450 --> 0:19:49.330
<v Speaker 4>But suffice to say, there's a lot of funny business

0:19:49.330 --> 0:19:52.170
<v Speaker 4>that can happen after the votes are counted and before

0:19:52.450 --> 0:19:56.250
<v Speaker 4>the Electoral College actually meets in Washington, DC in January,

0:19:56.650 --> 0:19:59.250
<v Speaker 4>and some people say that the Republicans are laying the

0:19:59.290 --> 0:20:02.810
<v Speaker 4>groundwork for some dodgy practices in terms of what the

0:20:02.850 --> 0:20:06.610
<v Speaker 4>people have voted for, not necessarily translating into the Electoral

0:20:06.690 --> 0:20:08.930
<v Speaker 4>College voters and what they vote for.

0:20:09.090 --> 0:20:11.650
<v Speaker 3>It drives me crazy that everybody keeps saying we don't.

0:20:11.490 --> 0:20:12.410
<v Speaker 6>Know enough about her.

0:20:12.530 --> 0:20:15.290
<v Speaker 3>I'm like, what do you want to know? Like you,

0:20:15.490 --> 0:20:16.570
<v Speaker 3>I don't understand.

0:20:16.890 --> 0:20:19.450
<v Speaker 4>At the same time, I do think that people have

0:20:19.570 --> 0:20:22.490
<v Speaker 4>said that she's giving kind of pat answers to things,

0:20:22.530 --> 0:20:24.330
<v Speaker 4>and I have been a little frustrated about that.

0:20:24.410 --> 0:20:27.770
<v Speaker 5>Jesse, Yeah, I've felt the same that there are still

0:20:27.850 --> 0:20:28.930
<v Speaker 5>questions that she hasn't answered.

0:20:28.930 --> 0:20:30.170
<v Speaker 3>What do you want to say?

0:20:30.410 --> 0:20:32.690
<v Speaker 5>I think that there are still questions even about immigration,

0:20:32.770 --> 0:20:34.770
<v Speaker 5>about the economy where she doesn't get specific any.

0:20:34.610 --> 0:20:36.810
<v Speaker 4>And what drives her I think is this sort of

0:20:36.850 --> 0:20:40.410
<v Speaker 4>growing consensus that we don't know what her fundamental drive.

0:20:40.210 --> 0:20:42.170
<v Speaker 5>Is about, which is why we need a press blitz,

0:20:42.210 --> 0:20:43.850
<v Speaker 5>which is why we need to say we.

0:20:43.730 --> 0:20:45.570
<v Speaker 3>Were on a press blitz. I thought we'd been on

0:20:45.610 --> 0:20:47.450
<v Speaker 3>a press blitz for the last ten days.

0:20:48.290 --> 0:20:50.730
<v Speaker 4>Let me give you one example before we end, which

0:20:50.770 --> 0:20:53.770
<v Speaker 4>is that the Washington Post publisher piece this year this

0:20:53.850 --> 0:20:56.890
<v Speaker 4>week it felt like this year about the six years

0:20:57.010 --> 0:21:00.650
<v Speaker 4>Kamala Harris spent six years in Canada during high school,

0:21:00.970 --> 0:21:05.090
<v Speaker 4>which she has literally never mentioned, never mentioned. And this

0:21:05.210 --> 0:21:08.130
<v Speaker 4>story she tells, which is about how there was a

0:21:08.170 --> 0:21:11.130
<v Speaker 4>girl at her high school who was being sexually abused

0:21:11.170 --> 0:21:13.810
<v Speaker 4>and this is what got her story of becoming a

0:21:13.810 --> 0:21:16.010
<v Speaker 4>district attorney that was in Canada.

0:21:16.290 --> 0:21:18.170
<v Speaker 6>That was not even an American story.

0:21:18.170 --> 0:21:21.970
<v Speaker 3>Wow, and it personally I think that matters, But go on, No,

0:21:22.010 --> 0:21:24.530
<v Speaker 3>but the way that it's told makes it sound like

0:21:24.690 --> 0:21:27.770
<v Speaker 3>she was her neighbor from her her neighborhood in San Francisco.

0:21:27.930 --> 0:21:30.810
<v Speaker 4>Yes, And I just think it says it all that

0:21:30.970 --> 0:21:34.210
<v Speaker 4>this far into this election, I'm reading that she spent

0:21:34.290 --> 0:21:36.050
<v Speaker 4>high school in another country.

0:21:36.170 --> 0:21:37.010
<v Speaker 6>It was surprising.

0:21:37.330 --> 0:21:39.810
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, No, I agree with that. What we need is

0:21:39.890 --> 0:21:42.490
<v Speaker 5>four hours Joe Rogan to sit down.

0:21:42.810 --> 0:21:48.130
<v Speaker 3>That will horrible. You'll get the probably It's like this

0:21:48.250 --> 0:21:50.250
<v Speaker 3>is the buy and she's in especially as a woman.

0:21:50.650 --> 0:21:53.010
<v Speaker 3>The more you say, the more holes can be picked.

0:21:53.130 --> 0:21:56.250
<v Speaker 3>Nobody is perfect. Look at Albanisi in his house, like

0:21:56.810 --> 0:21:57.890
<v Speaker 3>nobody is perfect.

0:21:58.210 --> 0:21:59.810
<v Speaker 6>There will be holes perfect before.

0:21:59.890 --> 0:22:05.050
<v Speaker 3>This is so annoying, but it's such an own goal,

0:22:05.410 --> 0:22:07.970
<v Speaker 3>like Welts and the China thing, like just tell people

0:22:08.050 --> 0:22:10.330
<v Speaker 3>the things. If you haven't goneything to hide, just tell

0:22:10.370 --> 0:22:10.810
<v Speaker 3>them the thing.

0:22:10.890 --> 0:22:13.010
<v Speaker 4>Then again, you said she's going to smoke weed with him?

0:22:13.090 --> 0:22:16.170
<v Speaker 4>Do you know that her father and Kamala stopped speaking

0:22:16.170 --> 0:22:18.690
<v Speaker 4>for years because when she was running for office a

0:22:18.690 --> 0:22:20.930
<v Speaker 4>few years ago, she was asked to her you on

0:22:21.410 --> 0:22:25.090
<v Speaker 4>legalizing marijuana, and she said something to the effect of,

0:22:25.130 --> 0:22:27.490
<v Speaker 4>my family's from Jamaica. You think I'm really going to

0:22:28.250 --> 0:22:31.810
<v Speaker 4>against And her father, who's an economics professor, who do

0:22:31.850 --> 0:22:34.130
<v Speaker 4>you grow up in Jamaica took offense at that sort

0:22:34.130 --> 0:22:37.410
<v Speaker 4>of evocation of a stereotype, and that's what caused him

0:22:37.410 --> 0:22:38.530
<v Speaker 4>to not speak for years.

0:22:38.810 --> 0:22:41.810
<v Speaker 6>So I don't think she's going to smoke, But.

0:22:41.930 --> 0:22:45.130
<v Speaker 3>How it drives me crazy think of all the things

0:22:45.130 --> 0:22:47.570
<v Speaker 3>that Trump has done that we know, like we know him,

0:22:47.650 --> 0:22:48.930
<v Speaker 3>we don't give.

0:22:48.810 --> 0:22:51.530
<v Speaker 4>A shit, Like when he dances for thirty seven in

0:22:51.610 --> 0:22:52.090
<v Speaker 4>the street.

0:22:52.770 --> 0:22:55.570
<v Speaker 6>Someone argue we know too much. We're way too much.

0:22:55.690 --> 0:23:00.650
<v Speaker 3>The faces he pulled anyway, Thank you, Amelia. We will

0:23:00.730 --> 0:23:01.890
<v Speaker 3>be back here next week.

0:23:02.130 --> 0:23:03.610
<v Speaker 6>Bye bye.

0:23:04.130 --> 0:23:07.770
<v Speaker 3>Thank you for listening to this exclusive subscriber episode. We'd

0:23:07.810 --> 0:23:10.130
<v Speaker 3>love to know what you think. Send us a message

0:23:10.130 --> 0:23:12.010
<v Speaker 3>in our out loud as Facebook group or email us

0:23:12.050 --> 0:23:14.970
<v Speaker 3>at out loud at mamamea dot com dot au and

0:23:15.050 --> 0:23:16.410
<v Speaker 3>we'll see you next time.