WEBVTT - Are We Done Being Bitchy About Lena Dunham?

0:00:08.234 --> 0:00:10.914
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to Amma Mia podcast.

0:00:15.874 --> 0:00:19.274
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to mummya out loud where women come to debrief.

0:00:19.434 --> 0:00:22.874
<v Speaker 2>I am Jesse Stevens, I'm mea Friedman, and I'm Amelia Lester.

0:00:23.194 --> 0:00:25.874
<v Speaker 2>And here is what's on our agenda for today, Monday,

0:00:26.034 --> 0:00:29.634
<v Speaker 2>the fourteenth of July. Everyone's talking about Lena Dunham's new

0:00:29.674 --> 0:00:33.153
<v Speaker 2>show Too Much, which dropped on Netflix last week. And

0:00:33.193 --> 0:00:36.674
<v Speaker 2>the girl's creator is suddenly everywhere. So where has she been?

0:00:36.754 --> 0:00:39.913
<v Speaker 2>And have we finally stopped being weird about Lena Dunham.

0:00:40.114 --> 0:00:43.193
<v Speaker 3>We've also got some scurrellous gossip about a secret meeting

0:00:43.233 --> 0:00:46.353
<v Speaker 3>between Teen Charles and Team Harry. I was eating this

0:00:46.394 --> 0:00:49.074
<v Speaker 3>story up over the weekend. We want to know what

0:00:49.153 --> 0:00:51.314
<v Speaker 3>it means and also who tipped off the paps?

0:00:51.754 --> 0:00:55.194
<v Speaker 1>And you are not imagining it. Women really are posting

0:00:55.273 --> 0:00:58.594
<v Speaker 1>less on social media and they're lurking more so are

0:00:58.634 --> 0:01:00.674
<v Speaker 1>we heading towards posting zero?

0:01:01.034 --> 0:01:03.354
<v Speaker 2>But first, in case you missed it, if you find

0:01:03.354 --> 0:01:06.234
<v Speaker 2>yourself dreading mondays or finding them harder than any other

0:01:06.314 --> 0:01:08.834
<v Speaker 2>day of the week, it could be because of this

0:01:08.874 --> 0:01:13.674
<v Speaker 2>phenomenon called identity lag. Speaking to Mamma Mia, a psychologist

0:01:13.834 --> 0:01:17.994
<v Speaker 2>named doctor Marni Lishman said, the shift from weekend you

0:01:18.154 --> 0:01:21.514
<v Speaker 2>to work you can be very emotionally jarring. There is

0:01:21.554 --> 0:01:26.074
<v Speaker 2>also a concept called role fragmentation, which, according to Stylist,

0:01:26.194 --> 0:01:29.914
<v Speaker 2>is what happens when we spend the weekend exploring parts

0:01:29.914 --> 0:01:32.834
<v Speaker 2>of ourselves that sort of go they're not expressed during

0:01:32.834 --> 0:01:34.834
<v Speaker 2>the work week right, and then we turn up on

0:01:34.874 --> 0:01:38.034
<v Speaker 2>Monday and we have to transform right into our LinkedIn

0:01:38.234 --> 0:01:42.794
<v Speaker 2>selves immediately. There's this experience of sort of whiplash, Amelia,

0:01:43.034 --> 0:01:43.794
<v Speaker 2>do you relate.

0:01:44.914 --> 0:01:48.154
<v Speaker 1>I'm about to confess something which probably makes me sound horrible,

0:01:48.194 --> 0:01:51.354
<v Speaker 1>but I actually look forward to Monday's.

0:01:50.994 --> 0:01:52.554
<v Speaker 2>Because you like that identity more.

0:01:53.994 --> 0:01:57.554
<v Speaker 1>I find it easier to inhabit. So I have two children,

0:01:57.594 --> 0:02:00.634
<v Speaker 1>and on the weekend there's a lot of chaos and

0:02:00.674 --> 0:02:04.634
<v Speaker 1>a lot of noise, and we don't have routines, whereas

0:02:04.714 --> 0:02:08.474
<v Speaker 1>during the week I have routines, and I love that routine.

0:02:08.633 --> 0:02:11.194
<v Speaker 1>And I'm often very tired on Sunday nights. And I

0:02:11.194 --> 0:02:15.394
<v Speaker 1>remember when I had very little kids, people at work

0:02:15.394 --> 0:02:17.594
<v Speaker 1>would say to me, have a good weekend, and I

0:02:17.634 --> 0:02:20.994
<v Speaker 1>would hate them because I knew that my weekend might

0:02:21.034 --> 0:02:24.354
<v Speaker 1>be fulfilling but was not going to be fun or easy,

0:02:24.914 --> 0:02:28.594
<v Speaker 1>and now I feel that less. But even so, Monday

0:02:28.634 --> 0:02:33.233
<v Speaker 1>brings routine and normalcy and talking to people who are

0:02:33.954 --> 0:02:36.034
<v Speaker 1>rational and professional.

0:02:36.234 --> 0:02:39.714
<v Speaker 2>But you work with mea the people, how about you.

0:02:40.634 --> 0:02:43.074
<v Speaker 3>I really related to this because I think we all

0:02:43.114 --> 0:02:47.194
<v Speaker 3>wear a mask at work, and we should in many ways,

0:02:47.194 --> 0:02:49.674
<v Speaker 3>because you know, you shouldn't let it all hang out

0:02:49.714 --> 0:02:52.834
<v Speaker 3>at work. Also for me, sometimes I take my medication

0:02:52.954 --> 0:02:55.594
<v Speaker 3>during the work week, but then I didn't on this weekend,

0:02:56.354 --> 0:03:00.554
<v Speaker 3>and I did feel quite different. I do inher habit too,

0:03:00.634 --> 0:03:05.034
<v Speaker 3>sort of slightly different personas. But this morning I'm sort

0:03:05.034 --> 0:03:07.794
<v Speaker 3>of fighting off a cold over the weekend, and I

0:03:07.834 --> 0:03:10.314
<v Speaker 3>thought I didn't want to call in sick because I

0:03:10.394 --> 0:03:13.314
<v Speaker 3>knew Holly was away and all of that stuff, and

0:03:13.394 --> 0:03:15.514
<v Speaker 3>I wanted to do this show, but also I wanted

0:03:15.554 --> 0:03:18.594
<v Speaker 3>to inhabit this persona. I knew I could stay home

0:03:19.114 --> 0:03:25.954
<v Speaker 3>and continue with my weekend persona, which was unwashed hair. Yeah,

0:03:26.034 --> 0:03:28.914
<v Speaker 3>but I wanted to lift and be in this persona.

0:03:28.994 --> 0:03:31.714
<v Speaker 2>Don't you reckon when you turn up on Monday, though,

0:03:31.914 --> 0:03:33.394
<v Speaker 2>I find it hard to get my head in the game,

0:03:33.434 --> 0:03:35.594
<v Speaker 2>like my head somewhere else, at least for the first

0:03:35.994 --> 0:03:38.754
<v Speaker 2>half a day. And then when you look around, there's

0:03:38.754 --> 0:03:41.514
<v Speaker 2>a sense of everyone's sort of cose playing work. I

0:03:41.594 --> 0:03:43.434
<v Speaker 2>found this. I remember when everyone came back to the

0:03:43.434 --> 0:03:45.994
<v Speaker 2>office after COVID, and I think identity lag can be

0:03:46.074 --> 0:03:49.634
<v Speaker 2>something that happens with significant life changes that you're still

0:03:49.634 --> 0:03:51.874
<v Speaker 2>People came back to the office and they were still

0:03:51.914 --> 0:03:55.634
<v Speaker 2>work from home identity, and you could see everyone kind

0:03:55.714 --> 0:04:00.074
<v Speaker 2>of cose playing, sitting there, working meetings, using lingo to

0:04:00.074 --> 0:04:01.154
<v Speaker 2>try and get themselves.

0:04:01.234 --> 0:04:03.434
<v Speaker 1>Kind of a lot with the mask back back.

0:04:03.474 --> 0:04:07.434
<v Speaker 3>After holidays or after Matt leave or any Yeah, starting

0:04:07.434 --> 0:04:09.674
<v Speaker 3>a new job, I always find you just sort of codsplaying,

0:04:09.754 --> 0:04:12.034
<v Speaker 3>trying to work out what your new identity is in

0:04:12.074 --> 0:04:12.794
<v Speaker 3>that workplace.

0:04:12.954 --> 0:04:14.834
<v Speaker 1>You could argue that the whole world's kind of going

0:04:14.874 --> 0:04:16.594
<v Speaker 1>through identity like post pandemic.

0:04:17.034 --> 0:04:18.634
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think it's still happening.

0:04:19.394 --> 0:04:22.434
<v Speaker 3>I spent the weekend binging on all ten episodes of

0:04:22.514 --> 0:04:25.873
<v Speaker 3>Lena Dunham's new Netflix series Too Much. She's the writer,

0:04:25.914 --> 0:04:28.753
<v Speaker 3>of the creator, and the director. She also has a

0:04:29.034 --> 0:04:32.473
<v Speaker 3>supporting role in it, playing the sister of the main character,

0:04:32.753 --> 0:04:35.313
<v Speaker 3>but she's not the star of this show. The show

0:04:35.594 --> 0:04:39.914
<v Speaker 3>is semi autobiographical. It's about an American woman in her

0:04:39.953 --> 0:04:42.633
<v Speaker 3>thirties who leaves New York after a bad breakup to

0:04:42.714 --> 0:04:45.594
<v Speaker 3>move to London where she meets this musician and they

0:04:45.594 --> 0:04:48.313
<v Speaker 3>fall in love. It's a rom com. It's got a

0:04:48.354 --> 0:04:53.034
<v Speaker 3>phenomenal supporting cast. The main character is played by an

0:04:53.073 --> 0:04:56.833
<v Speaker 3>actress called Megan Stalta, who she plays Kayla in Hacks.

0:04:56.993 --> 0:05:00.794
<v Speaker 3>She's kind of the assistant. She looks a lot like Lena,

0:05:00.914 --> 0:05:03.674
<v Speaker 3>and she sort of acts a little bit like Hannah Horvath.

0:05:03.794 --> 0:05:04.474
<v Speaker 1>Thin Girls.

0:05:05.193 --> 0:05:07.873
<v Speaker 3>We're going to talk about too much on Friday Show,

0:05:08.154 --> 0:05:10.474
<v Speaker 3>but today we wanted to talk about Lena.

0:05:11.113 --> 0:05:13.873
<v Speaker 1>Girls was obviously her breakout hit.

0:05:13.953 --> 0:05:16.274
<v Speaker 3>She was only twenty five when she wrote and directed

0:05:16.873 --> 0:05:20.633
<v Speaker 3>and was the showrunner on that show, and she was

0:05:20.714 --> 0:05:24.034
<v Speaker 3>everywhere for the six seasons. That Girls was around six

0:05:24.154 --> 0:05:26.433
<v Speaker 3>or seven seasons. It was the sort of the mid

0:05:26.794 --> 0:05:30.313
<v Speaker 3>twenty tens, and we just wanted to have a little

0:05:30.354 --> 0:05:34.034
<v Speaker 3>bit of an explainer about her place in the culture

0:05:34.113 --> 0:05:36.513
<v Speaker 3>and why. You might remember she seemed to be so

0:05:36.633 --> 0:05:40.674
<v Speaker 3>controversial back then until she basically was so controversial she

0:05:40.953 --> 0:05:44.994
<v Speaker 3>imploded and disappeared. She's done a lot of things since then,

0:05:45.034 --> 0:05:47.713
<v Speaker 3>but she also did move to London about five years

0:05:47.714 --> 0:05:51.113
<v Speaker 3>ago and met this musician and got married and he's

0:05:51.154 --> 0:05:53.753
<v Speaker 3>the co creator of this show with her, and I

0:05:53.834 --> 0:05:56.153
<v Speaker 3>just wanted to recap because there's two kinds of people,

0:05:56.193 --> 0:05:58.474
<v Speaker 3>the ones who know all the law and who watch

0:05:58.553 --> 0:06:00.873
<v Speaker 3>Girls and who are huge fans, and then there are

0:06:00.914 --> 0:06:03.034
<v Speaker 3>those who didn't and who are a little bit foggy.

0:06:03.073 --> 0:06:04.873
<v Speaker 3>They've heard of Lena Dunna, they've heard of Girls, but

0:06:04.914 --> 0:06:06.394
<v Speaker 3>they don't really know the details.

0:06:06.553 --> 0:06:09.913
<v Speaker 2>A lot of people have forgotten but know that Lena

0:06:09.993 --> 0:06:13.073
<v Speaker 2>Dunham was somewhat exiled, whether that was like a self

0:06:13.113 --> 0:06:17.473
<v Speaker 2>appointed exile or she was sort of passed out from Hollywood,

0:06:17.474 --> 0:06:19.914
<v Speaker 2>But I don't think people can remember the point at

0:06:19.914 --> 0:06:22.074
<v Speaker 2>which she was sort of what.

0:06:22.073 --> 0:06:24.753
<v Speaker 3>Did she do and who was she? Amelia for those

0:06:24.794 --> 0:06:26.033
<v Speaker 3>who were a bit vague.

0:06:26.354 --> 0:06:28.993
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So I actually remember the very first time I

0:06:29.073 --> 0:06:31.474
<v Speaker 1>heard about Lena Dunham, and it was in twenty ten,

0:06:31.714 --> 0:06:34.633
<v Speaker 1>and I was working at the New Yorker magazine and

0:06:35.034 --> 0:06:37.514
<v Speaker 1>we had these ideas meetings every week and people would

0:06:37.513 --> 0:06:40.393
<v Speaker 1>bring ideas about things that people were talking about, pitched

0:06:40.393 --> 0:06:44.753
<v Speaker 1>them essentially as stories, and this extremely switched on, very

0:06:44.834 --> 0:06:48.273
<v Speaker 1>very cool young man came to the meeting and he

0:06:48.313 --> 0:06:50.193
<v Speaker 1>always had the best ideas, and he came to the meeting,

0:06:50.234 --> 0:06:53.873
<v Speaker 1>and he said, there's this young director called Lena Dunham,

0:06:54.354 --> 0:06:57.953
<v Speaker 1>and she has written and directed a movie called Tiny Furniture.

0:06:57.993 --> 0:06:59.553
<v Speaker 1>And I thought, that is such a strange name for

0:06:59.633 --> 0:07:03.794
<v Speaker 1>a movie, and because I am evidently not an especially

0:07:03.794 --> 0:07:07.073
<v Speaker 1>good magazine editor, I passed on that story, which is

0:07:07.234 --> 0:07:09.354
<v Speaker 1>sort of like when all those people passed on signing

0:07:09.354 --> 0:07:13.114
<v Speaker 1>the Beatles when they shopping their first album around. Because

0:07:13.234 --> 0:07:16.434
<v Speaker 1>very shortly after that she did become extremely famous, and

0:07:16.554 --> 0:07:19.833
<v Speaker 1>it's easy to forget quite how exciting it felt to

0:07:19.953 --> 0:07:23.914
<v Speaker 1>watch that ascent happen so Tiny Furniture it became very

0:07:23.953 --> 0:07:26.674
<v Speaker 1>famous very quickly because, in addition to being a very

0:07:26.714 --> 0:07:28.914
<v Speaker 1>interesting sort of movie about a woman coming of age

0:07:28.914 --> 0:07:31.154
<v Speaker 1>in New York, there was a sex scene which took

0:07:31.194 --> 0:07:35.114
<v Speaker 1>place in an abandoned tunnel in Brooklyn, Oh, And there

0:07:35.154 --> 0:07:37.674
<v Speaker 1>was this frank depiction of sex that we had never

0:07:37.714 --> 0:07:42.234
<v Speaker 1>seen before. I can't stress how revolutionary this was. It

0:07:42.274 --> 0:07:44.713
<v Speaker 1>was a sex scene in an abandoned tunnel. It was

0:07:44.714 --> 0:07:48.794
<v Speaker 1>not glamorous. The parts did not fit together like tetris,

0:07:48.794 --> 0:07:51.554
<v Speaker 1>which is often how we see sex scenes and certainly

0:07:51.634 --> 0:07:54.674
<v Speaker 1>used to see sex scenes on film. It felt very

0:07:54.874 --> 0:07:58.194
<v Speaker 1>real and gritty and quite literally dirty because it was

0:07:58.234 --> 0:08:01.754
<v Speaker 1>in an abandoned tunnel, and there was something incredibly exciting

0:08:01.794 --> 0:08:05.594
<v Speaker 1>about seeing a young woman's vision of sex, which is

0:08:05.634 --> 0:08:10.674
<v Speaker 1>sometimes profoundly and fulfilling. Sometimes it doesn't always in orgasms,

0:08:10.794 --> 0:08:12.914
<v Speaker 1>and in fact sometimes the man can be a real

0:08:13.034 --> 0:08:15.234
<v Speaker 1>jerk afterwards. And you hadn't really seen any of that

0:08:15.274 --> 0:08:18.114
<v Speaker 1>from a woman's point of view. So if I sound excited,

0:08:18.154 --> 0:08:20.714
<v Speaker 1>it was because it did feel like a new way

0:08:20.754 --> 0:08:25.514
<v Speaker 1>of thinking about young woman. Yeah. And so then unsurprisingly

0:08:25.554 --> 0:08:28.194
<v Speaker 1>shortly after that, she teamed up with Judd Apatow, who

0:08:28.314 --> 0:08:30.394
<v Speaker 1>was everywhere at the time the director of The Forty

0:08:30.434 --> 0:08:33.713
<v Speaker 1>year Old Virgin and This Is Forty and other movies

0:08:33.794 --> 0:08:36.434
<v Speaker 1>like that, sort of you could argue taking that same

0:08:36.834 --> 0:08:39.754
<v Speaker 1>no holds barred approach to men. He teamed up with

0:08:39.834 --> 0:08:42.634
<v Speaker 1>Lena Dunham, who was doing it for women's lives, and

0:08:42.674 --> 0:08:45.754
<v Speaker 1>then they made together Girls, which premiered, as you said me,

0:08:45.834 --> 0:08:47.754
<v Speaker 1>and when she was just twenty five and twenty twelve,

0:08:48.354 --> 0:08:51.434
<v Speaker 1>everyone called Girls the millennial generation's answer to Sex and

0:08:51.474 --> 0:08:53.514
<v Speaker 1>the City. It was sort of everything Sex and the

0:08:53.554 --> 0:08:56.434
<v Speaker 1>City was, and it was also about four women in

0:08:56.474 --> 0:08:59.994
<v Speaker 1>New York. But these four women were really going through

0:09:00.074 --> 0:09:03.953
<v Speaker 1>messy struggles. It wasn't glamorous. They were not drinking cosmos

0:09:03.994 --> 0:09:07.114
<v Speaker 1>in bars. They were kind of like taking gin shops

0:09:07.434 --> 0:09:10.474
<v Speaker 1>in their sort of like hoveled apartments in Brooklyn. It

0:09:10.514 --> 0:09:13.714
<v Speaker 1>felt very different. It had lots of critical acclaim millions

0:09:13.714 --> 0:09:16.074
<v Speaker 1>of viewers. The second season was greenlit before the first

0:09:16.154 --> 0:09:19.714
<v Speaker 1>was even over. But then even as Girls was this

0:09:19.794 --> 0:09:22.914
<v Speaker 1>huge touchstone moment. Over the course of the six seasons

0:09:22.914 --> 0:09:25.754
<v Speaker 1>that it was on, I remember that you started to

0:09:25.874 --> 0:09:28.594
<v Speaker 1>feel Lena Dunham slipped down the mountain, as we so

0:09:28.794 --> 0:09:30.874
<v Speaker 1>often do the women, we build them up, and she

0:09:31.034 --> 0:09:34.394
<v Speaker 1>became the voice of her generation. People often quote this

0:09:34.514 --> 0:09:37.194
<v Speaker 1>line from the pilot of Girls, where her fictional character

0:09:37.234 --> 0:09:39.994
<v Speaker 1>Hannah Horvar says, I may not be the voice of

0:09:40.114 --> 0:09:42.594
<v Speaker 1>my generation, but I feel that I am a voice

0:09:42.594 --> 0:09:45.314
<v Speaker 1>of a generation. But in fact, over time she became

0:09:45.314 --> 0:09:46.434
<v Speaker 1>the voice of millennials.

0:09:47.114 --> 0:09:49.674
<v Speaker 3>Can we talk about her body though? And I, you know,

0:09:49.754 --> 0:09:52.554
<v Speaker 3>I just think we'd be remiss not to, because part

0:09:52.594 --> 0:09:55.274
<v Speaker 3>of what was so transgressive about that show and about

0:09:55.274 --> 0:09:57.874
<v Speaker 3>her starring in it, is that she didn't have the

0:09:57.954 --> 0:10:00.034
<v Speaker 3>kind of body we were used to seeing, even in

0:10:00.034 --> 0:10:02.434
<v Speaker 3>the sex scenes on sex and the City or on

0:10:02.514 --> 0:10:07.114
<v Speaker 3>shows like Friends, the female lead was always a side

0:10:07.274 --> 0:10:10.794
<v Speaker 3>zero and looked a certain way, and she didn't. And

0:10:11.274 --> 0:10:13.474
<v Speaker 3>it's so funny looking back now because like a lot

0:10:13.474 --> 0:10:16.754
<v Speaker 3>of people, I'm rewatching Girls and it's almost like when

0:10:16.754 --> 0:10:19.314
<v Speaker 3>you rewatch Bridget Jones and all of the talk about

0:10:19.354 --> 0:10:23.514
<v Speaker 3>how fat Rene Zellwiga was, and there was all this

0:10:23.634 --> 0:10:26.154
<v Speaker 3>talk about Lena Dunnam and how brave she was or

0:10:26.194 --> 0:10:30.234
<v Speaker 3>how shocking it was to see her having sex and

0:10:30.314 --> 0:10:33.314
<v Speaker 3>not talking about her body. Her body was incidental and

0:10:33.354 --> 0:10:35.794
<v Speaker 3>when you look back now, she'd be what a size

0:10:35.834 --> 0:10:36.914
<v Speaker 3>ten to twelve maybe.

0:10:37.634 --> 0:10:40.074
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. There was even an episode of Girls where she

0:10:40.474 --> 0:10:43.474
<v Speaker 1>has this kind of sexy weekend with a stranger that

0:10:43.554 --> 0:10:47.154
<v Speaker 1>she meets and he's very, very handsome. Yes, And there

0:10:47.234 --> 0:10:49.674
<v Speaker 1>was this whole discourse because this is what we did

0:10:49.754 --> 0:10:52.874
<v Speaker 1>back then, where everyone was saying that it was an

0:10:52.954 --> 0:10:56.794
<v Speaker 1>unrealistic plot because he was too good looking for her.

0:10:57.114 --> 0:10:59.713
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, she was this lightning rod in that she was

0:10:59.754 --> 0:11:04.074
<v Speaker 2>being criticized by the far right for being what they

0:11:04.154 --> 0:11:08.234
<v Speaker 2>saw as not conventionally attractive or to work or whatever.

0:11:08.754 --> 0:11:12.234
<v Speaker 2>But then I think she pissed the left off to

0:11:12.314 --> 0:11:16.434
<v Speaker 2>the same degree, and often because the show was criticized

0:11:16.554 --> 0:11:21.274
<v Speaker 2>for not being diverse. It was very white. It wasn't

0:11:21.274 --> 0:11:25.114
<v Speaker 2>maybe self aware about class that show. It wasn't possible

0:11:25.154 --> 0:11:26.434
<v Speaker 2>for it to be all things.

0:11:26.154 --> 0:11:26.674
<v Speaker 3>To all people.

0:11:26.754 --> 0:11:28.554
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, shall we get into some of the controversies. I

0:11:28.594 --> 0:11:30.594
<v Speaker 1>see some of the things that tipped her down the mountain,

0:11:30.594 --> 0:11:34.234
<v Speaker 1>because there's a couple of interesting ones to revisit. I think. So,

0:11:34.274 --> 0:11:37.474
<v Speaker 1>she had a huge memoir deal with Random House in

0:11:37.554 --> 0:11:40.634
<v Speaker 1>twenty fourteen. Her memoir came out and they had paid

0:11:40.634 --> 0:11:42.594
<v Speaker 1>three point five million dollars for it, So there was

0:11:42.594 --> 0:11:45.034
<v Speaker 1>a lot of excitement about that when it came out.

0:11:45.674 --> 0:11:48.354
<v Speaker 1>And in it she talks about being curious about her

0:11:48.394 --> 0:11:51.953
<v Speaker 1>siblings Vagina when her sibling was a toddler. She talks

0:11:51.954 --> 0:11:54.554
<v Speaker 1>about opening it and putting some stones in there, some

0:11:54.594 --> 0:11:57.154
<v Speaker 1>pebbles in there, and also trying to kiss her sibling

0:11:57.194 --> 0:11:58.274
<v Speaker 1>on the lips when she.

0:11:58.274 --> 0:12:01.354
<v Speaker 3>Was changing her siblings naprsing, and she was My memory

0:12:01.394 --> 0:12:03.874
<v Speaker 3>is that she was only seven. No, she was seven

0:12:03.914 --> 0:12:05.474
<v Speaker 3>and her sibling was like three.

0:12:05.354 --> 0:12:09.114
<v Speaker 1>A toddler. Yes, So the alt right, which was rising

0:12:09.154 --> 0:12:11.674
<v Speaker 1>at the time, because we didn't even really have the

0:12:11.714 --> 0:12:14.074
<v Speaker 1>phrase back then, I think we probably would have described

0:12:14.114 --> 0:12:17.674
<v Speaker 1>them as sort of conservative provocateurs. But this rising alt

0:12:17.794 --> 0:12:22.194
<v Speaker 1>right really seized on these anecdotes as evidence that Lena

0:12:22.274 --> 0:12:25.234
<v Speaker 1>Dunham was a sexual predator. And it might sound a

0:12:25.234 --> 0:12:28.074
<v Speaker 1>bit absurd now because her siblings spoke out and said

0:12:28.074 --> 0:12:30.434
<v Speaker 1>this was not a problem and she was a toddler,

0:12:30.474 --> 0:12:33.034
<v Speaker 1>but it made no difference. That was really the start

0:12:33.194 --> 0:12:34.314
<v Speaker 1>of her fall from grace.

0:12:34.514 --> 0:12:36.754
<v Speaker 3>You know, you would never put that in a book now, right,

0:12:36.914 --> 0:12:40.714
<v Speaker 3>because it was those early years of when things were

0:12:40.714 --> 0:12:45.834
<v Speaker 3>being weaponized offhanded comments, and Lena Dunham was very unfiltered.

0:12:45.874 --> 0:12:48.994
<v Speaker 3>Her character was as well, but she was then called

0:12:48.994 --> 0:12:50.954
<v Speaker 3>to sort of as the voice of her generation to

0:12:50.994 --> 0:12:53.954
<v Speaker 3>speak about all these different things and girls was it

0:12:54.034 --> 0:12:56.074
<v Speaker 3>was back when there was more of a monoculture.

0:12:56.274 --> 0:12:57.434
<v Speaker 1>Everybody would watch it and.

0:12:57.394 --> 0:13:00.154
<v Speaker 3>Every week there would be these big discussions, and it

0:13:00.194 --> 0:13:03.514
<v Speaker 3>was also the rise of women's websites and blogs like Jezebel,

0:13:03.834 --> 0:13:06.794
<v Speaker 3>so everything would be sort of picked apart every Now.

0:13:06.954 --> 0:13:09.674
<v Speaker 2>There was this quote by Kevin Fallon where he said

0:13:09.714 --> 0:13:12.154
<v Speaker 2>it was the discourse apocalypse, which I think is a

0:13:12.194 --> 0:13:14.634
<v Speaker 2>really good description of that hot tame of that time,

0:13:14.714 --> 0:13:17.874
<v Speaker 2>and the book I think fits into this. What's worth

0:13:17.914 --> 0:13:21.354
<v Speaker 2>acknowledging is that it was absolute cultural saturation because while

0:13:21.354 --> 0:13:24.314
<v Speaker 2>there was girls, there was also the memoir, the personal essay,

0:13:24.354 --> 0:13:27.234
<v Speaker 2>which you know has disappeared people do not.

0:13:27.354 --> 0:13:29.914
<v Speaker 1>Well, and that was part of her breakthrough, was that

0:13:30.194 --> 0:13:34.554
<v Speaker 1>disclosure and women talking frankly about these most private things

0:13:35.034 --> 0:13:38.194
<v Speaker 1>was seen as a liberation rather than sort of a liability.

0:13:38.314 --> 0:13:40.954
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and then there was Lenny Letter, There was Women

0:13:40.954 --> 0:13:43.114
<v Speaker 2>of the Hour, there was interviews, there was social media

0:13:44.314 --> 0:13:45.674
<v Speaker 2>early on everywhere.

0:13:45.674 --> 0:13:48.914
<v Speaker 3>She's incredibly prolific, and it's interesting strife is set at

0:13:48.914 --> 0:13:51.914
<v Speaker 3>this time too, very deliberately because it was the beginning.

0:13:52.034 --> 0:13:54.754
<v Speaker 3>It was the rise of women's media and a lot

0:13:54.754 --> 0:13:57.554
<v Speaker 3>of women's voices in the media, like Lena Dunham. But

0:13:57.594 --> 0:14:00.514
<v Speaker 3>it was also the beginning of cancel culture, when the

0:14:00.674 --> 0:14:05.953
<v Speaker 3>left started to be very censorious of particularly outspoken women.

0:14:06.194 --> 0:14:08.194
<v Speaker 1>And let's get to that, but also the idea of

0:14:08.274 --> 0:14:10.514
<v Speaker 1>so we've talked about why the right kind of seized

0:14:10.554 --> 0:14:12.994
<v Speaker 1>on her. She was a messy woman who was also

0:14:13.034 --> 0:14:15.874
<v Speaker 1>in their viewer, sexual predator. On the left, there was

0:14:15.914 --> 0:14:19.554
<v Speaker 1>also this rising sort of criticism of her. You mentioned

0:14:19.594 --> 0:14:22.034
<v Speaker 1>Lenny Letter, that was her newsletter, and that was also

0:14:22.194 --> 0:14:24.834
<v Speaker 1>she has always been ahead of her time, podcasting Before

0:14:24.834 --> 0:14:28.234
<v Speaker 1>a Time newsletter Right Before a Time, And in this newsletter,

0:14:28.314 --> 0:14:30.994
<v Speaker 1>Lenny Letter, she wrote an essay once, a personal essay

0:14:31.114 --> 0:14:33.994
<v Speaker 1>about going to the met Gala, and she wrote that

0:14:34.074 --> 0:14:36.794
<v Speaker 1>she was sitting next to this football player called Odell

0:14:36.874 --> 0:14:39.794
<v Speaker 1>Beckham Junior, and I'm just going to quote from it.

0:14:39.794 --> 0:14:41.994
<v Speaker 1>It was like we were forced to be together. And

0:14:42.074 --> 0:14:45.314
<v Speaker 1>he literally was scrolling Instagram rather than have to look

0:14:45.354 --> 0:14:47.874
<v Speaker 1>at a woman in a bow tie because Lena had

0:14:47.874 --> 0:14:50.514
<v Speaker 1>worn a bow tie to this met gala. I was like,

0:14:50.674 --> 0:14:53.754
<v Speaker 1>this should be called the Metropolitan Museum of getting rejected

0:14:53.794 --> 0:14:56.594
<v Speaker 1>by athletes. So the whole point was how fat and

0:14:56.714 --> 0:14:59.074
<v Speaker 1>ugly she felt sitting next to Adell Beckham Junior, who

0:14:59.114 --> 0:15:01.514
<v Speaker 1>was not interested in talking to her. This was at

0:15:01.554 --> 0:15:04.474
<v Speaker 1>the time when intersectionality not a new concept, but one

0:15:04.474 --> 0:15:07.674
<v Speaker 1>which was rising in value and in prominence. At the time,

0:15:08.034 --> 0:15:11.394
<v Speaker 1>people felt like a white woman was saying that she

0:15:11.554 --> 0:15:15.314
<v Speaker 1>was entitled to attention and affection from a black man,

0:15:15.714 --> 0:15:18.314
<v Speaker 1>and that was a real lightning bolt moment.

0:15:18.554 --> 0:15:20.674
<v Speaker 3>Do you think would you say, Amelia that it's when

0:15:20.794 --> 0:15:24.114
<v Speaker 3>Because she's always done a lot of personal disclosure, and

0:15:24.434 --> 0:15:28.914
<v Speaker 3>so her authors and artists since the beginning of creativity,

0:15:29.514 --> 0:15:32.074
<v Speaker 3>but it was the time when the personal was being

0:15:32.194 --> 0:15:36.594
<v Speaker 3>very politicized. So everything she would say personally, whether it

0:15:36.634 --> 0:15:40.514
<v Speaker 3>was about playing doctors with her sibling or this personal

0:15:40.594 --> 0:15:43.634
<v Speaker 3>experience of how she felt next to this man, suddenly

0:15:43.914 --> 0:15:48.074
<v Speaker 3>everything was taken and overlaid with this political context that

0:15:48.194 --> 0:15:51.034
<v Speaker 3>was often used to cancel her.

0:15:51.394 --> 0:15:54.154
<v Speaker 1>Well, I'm quite literally political because the other thing I'm

0:15:54.194 --> 0:15:57.474
<v Speaker 1>going to throw into this heady cauldron of cancel culture

0:15:57.594 --> 0:16:02.874
<v Speaker 1>is Hillary Clinton. So twenty sixteen, she starts basically part

0:16:02.874 --> 0:16:06.594
<v Speaker 1>time to full time campaigning for Hillary Clinton's presidential run.

0:16:07.154 --> 0:16:10.114
<v Speaker 1>And there was that whole idea around them that this

0:16:10.234 --> 0:16:12.994
<v Speaker 1>was going to be Hillary Clinton breaking the glass ceiling

0:16:13.474 --> 0:16:16.714
<v Speaker 1>in her pants suit. Remember pants suit Nation. This idea

0:16:16.754 --> 0:16:19.674
<v Speaker 1>of women felt jubilant that finally they were going to

0:16:19.674 --> 0:16:23.114
<v Speaker 1>get a woman in the Oval office, and Lena really

0:16:23.154 --> 0:16:25.874
<v Speaker 1>spent the year campaigning for her. Along the way, while

0:16:25.914 --> 0:16:27.714
<v Speaker 1>she was on the campaign trail, she said that she

0:16:27.834 --> 0:16:30.634
<v Speaker 1>was she had an abortion, another reason why the left

0:16:30.674 --> 0:16:32.594
<v Speaker 1>did not love her, And of course the left didn't

0:16:32.594 --> 0:16:35.234
<v Speaker 1>really love Hillary Clinton. She was a centrist candidate who

0:16:35.234 --> 0:16:37.194
<v Speaker 1>happened to be running for the left.

0:16:37.434 --> 0:16:39.354
<v Speaker 3>But I know what she was trying to say like

0:16:39.394 --> 0:16:43.554
<v Speaker 3>that is just such an example of how the conversation changed.

0:16:43.594 --> 0:16:46.034
<v Speaker 3>So as part of her podcast, she'd done an episode

0:16:46.074 --> 0:16:50.714
<v Speaker 3>about abortion, and someone asked her in an interview, have

0:16:50.794 --> 0:16:53.074
<v Speaker 3>you ever had an abortion? And she said, no, I

0:16:53.114 --> 0:16:55.834
<v Speaker 3>wish I had. But taken out of context, what she

0:16:55.874 --> 0:16:59.314
<v Speaker 3>was trying to say is she was trying to be silly.

0:16:59.354 --> 0:17:01.114
<v Speaker 1>And you know, self, step.

0:17:00.954 --> 0:17:03.154
<v Speaker 2>Think that what you're speaking to as well is that

0:17:03.234 --> 0:17:06.033
<v Speaker 2>we didn't know how to take her because she was

0:17:06.114 --> 0:17:13.194
<v Speaker 2>this character, this classic to uncouple Hannah Horvath from Lena Dunham,

0:17:13.194 --> 0:17:16.754
<v Speaker 2>I still think we don't quite know how to do that, and.

0:17:16.234 --> 0:17:19.874
<v Speaker 1>That's why she's cast someone else as in this new exactly.

0:17:20.514 --> 0:17:24.634
<v Speaker 2>And I think that activists now almost have to adopt

0:17:24.714 --> 0:17:27.994
<v Speaker 2>this earnest tone because if you are an activist, if

0:17:27.994 --> 0:17:29.954
<v Speaker 2>you have something very serious to say about the world,

0:17:29.994 --> 0:17:33.794
<v Speaker 2>you can never joke. So she would clumsily say things,

0:17:33.914 --> 0:17:35.434
<v Speaker 2>she would joke about something that.

0:17:35.434 --> 0:17:37.194
<v Speaker 1>Was very seriously because she's very funny.

0:17:37.234 --> 0:17:39.594
<v Speaker 2>She's very funny, and girl was very funny, brilliant writer,

0:17:39.794 --> 0:17:41.994
<v Speaker 2>and so she'd say things tongue in cheek, even on

0:17:42.114 --> 0:17:44.954
<v Speaker 2>girls that were then weaponized because we were like, well,

0:17:44.994 --> 0:17:47.194
<v Speaker 2>what are you about? Are you a feminist or are

0:17:47.234 --> 0:17:50.954
<v Speaker 2>you And it's how feminism became this like stick to

0:17:50.994 --> 0:17:55.114
<v Speaker 2>beat women with, because sometimes she did and she did

0:17:55.154 --> 0:17:56.994
<v Speaker 2>make real mistakes. Like I think it was just after

0:17:57.034 --> 0:17:59.994
<v Speaker 2>the Me Too movement when someone was accused.

0:17:59.514 --> 0:18:02.354
<v Speaker 1>Of Yeah, we should just talk briefly about that, because

0:18:02.394 --> 0:18:05.114
<v Speaker 1>that was I think the fine or nail in the

0:18:05.154 --> 0:18:08.274
<v Speaker 1>coffin Fellina Dunham. The left and the right just couldn't

0:18:08.274 --> 0:18:12.114
<v Speaker 1>handle her anymore. So what happened was in November twenty seventeen.

0:18:12.314 --> 0:18:15.554
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, during the metre movement, there was a girl's

0:18:15.594 --> 0:18:19.034
<v Speaker 1>writer named Mary Miller a man, and an actress named

0:18:19.074 --> 0:18:22.553
<v Speaker 1>Aurora Perry No accused him of sexually assaulting her. This

0:18:22.674 --> 0:18:24.994
<v Speaker 1>was back in twenty twelve, but the allegation came out

0:18:25.034 --> 0:18:28.833
<v Speaker 1>in November twenty seventeen. Dunham responded to the accusations and

0:18:28.834 --> 0:18:31.754
<v Speaker 1>she said, Nope, I know him. He did not do this.

0:18:31.954 --> 0:18:34.074
<v Speaker 1>She said. While our first instinct is to listen to

0:18:34.154 --> 0:18:38.874
<v Speaker 1>every woman's story, our insider knowledge makes us confident that

0:18:38.914 --> 0:18:41.354
<v Speaker 1>this accusation is one of the three percent of assault

0:18:41.394 --> 0:18:44.874
<v Speaker 1>cases that are misreported every year. Now I remember reading

0:18:44.874 --> 0:18:46.954
<v Speaker 1>that on Instagram, do you I do I think. I

0:18:46.994 --> 0:18:49.594
<v Speaker 1>talked about it at the time, and I was devastated

0:18:50.034 --> 0:18:53.474
<v Speaker 1>because it just felt like a real betrayal. And I

0:18:53.514 --> 0:18:56.674
<v Speaker 1>don't identify with either the far left or the far right,

0:18:57.114 --> 0:18:59.674
<v Speaker 1>but to me, she lost me in that moment. I

0:18:59.754 --> 0:19:02.194
<v Speaker 1>have to appear right. She lost me and I was

0:19:02.194 --> 0:19:04.313
<v Speaker 1>a huge fan of hers. So then after that she

0:19:04.394 --> 0:19:08.034
<v Speaker 1>went very much to ground. She basically left public eye.

0:19:08.274 --> 0:19:10.874
<v Speaker 1>There were some health reasons for that. She had a hysterectomy,

0:19:10.954 --> 0:19:14.273
<v Speaker 1>Judah endometriosis, and she wrote about that very beautiful lest

0:19:14.794 --> 0:19:18.034
<v Speaker 1>for US Vogue. She also was diagnosed with Ella's dwan

0:19:18.074 --> 0:19:21.874
<v Speaker 1>Lows syndrome, and so she does now identify and describe

0:19:21.874 --> 0:19:24.914
<v Speaker 1>herself as chronically ill. She moved to London in twenty

0:19:24.954 --> 0:19:27.394
<v Speaker 1>twenty one. She went to rehab. She went to rehab.

0:19:27.434 --> 0:19:31.634
<v Speaker 3>She was addicted to prescription medication and she broke up

0:19:31.674 --> 0:19:34.634
<v Speaker 3>a long term relationship through almost the entirety of girls.

0:19:34.674 --> 0:19:36.593
<v Speaker 1>She was dating Jack Antonoff.

0:19:36.034 --> 0:19:42.754
<v Speaker 3>Who's Taylor Swift's co collaborator, Lord's collaborator Margaret Qually. He's

0:19:42.794 --> 0:19:46.634
<v Speaker 3>married to Margaret Qually, and that was a very defining

0:19:46.954 --> 0:19:49.914
<v Speaker 3>relationship obviously in her life at a very defining time.

0:19:49.954 --> 0:19:51.553
<v Speaker 1>In her life, and.

0:19:51.674 --> 0:19:55.553
<v Speaker 3>There are a lot of biographical similarities. There's a character

0:19:55.634 --> 0:19:59.034
<v Speaker 3>very similar to him in Too Much, which is which

0:19:59.074 --> 0:20:01.994
<v Speaker 3>is also very interesting. But she's also very good friends

0:20:01.994 --> 0:20:04.914
<v Speaker 3>with Taylor Swift, who she no doubt met through her

0:20:04.954 --> 0:20:07.354
<v Speaker 3>relationship with Jack Antonoff and who she remains friends with

0:20:07.714 --> 0:20:10.154
<v Speaker 3>to this day. Taylor Swift was actually at her wedding too.

0:20:10.314 --> 0:20:13.234
<v Speaker 3>She was a brise man, yeah to this musician Loue Felder,

0:20:13.274 --> 0:20:16.434
<v Speaker 3>who's her co creator on Too Much. And she was

0:20:16.514 --> 0:20:19.793
<v Speaker 3>part of remember that whole squad, Yeah, with the nineteen

0:20:19.874 --> 0:20:23.434
<v Speaker 3>eighty nine tour. It was all of these supermodels and

0:20:23.554 --> 0:20:26.274
<v Speaker 3>Lena Dunham And she spoke afterwards, even though she's still

0:20:26.314 --> 0:20:29.553
<v Speaker 3>friends with Taylor, how that wasn't very good for her

0:20:30.194 --> 0:20:30.834
<v Speaker 3>self esteem.

0:20:30.874 --> 0:20:33.034
<v Speaker 1>Oh, it wasn't very good for Taylor's self esteem either.

0:20:33.234 --> 0:20:35.594
<v Speaker 1>They both suffered from eating disorders around that time that

0:20:35.634 --> 0:20:39.714
<v Speaker 1>they've spoken about. She moved to London. She did make

0:20:39.794 --> 0:20:43.354
<v Speaker 1>some films, none of them really hit. And now there's

0:20:43.434 --> 0:20:44.234
<v Speaker 1>this She.

0:20:44.194 --> 0:20:46.314
<v Speaker 3>Has a I think it's a fifty five million dollar

0:20:46.394 --> 0:20:49.474
<v Speaker 3>deal with Netflix, so she's made Too Much, which is

0:20:49.474 --> 0:20:52.474
<v Speaker 3>a ten episode series which I assume will go to

0:20:52.514 --> 0:20:54.874
<v Speaker 3>a second season because I think it's been pretty well received.

0:20:55.154 --> 0:20:57.874
<v Speaker 3>She's also currently directing I think it's a rom com

0:20:57.914 --> 0:21:00.154
<v Speaker 3>with Natalie Portman in New York.

0:21:00.434 --> 0:21:01.313
<v Speaker 1>Called Good Sex.

0:21:01.874 --> 0:21:05.074
<v Speaker 3>She's got a ton of different projects on the boil.

0:21:05.554 --> 0:21:10.474
<v Speaker 3>I think she's so talented, like crazy talented. She's like

0:21:10.514 --> 0:21:13.434
<v Speaker 3>one of the most talented creators of our generation.

0:21:13.874 --> 0:21:16.074
<v Speaker 2>She's a beautiful writer, and I suppose you can compare

0:21:16.114 --> 0:21:19.594
<v Speaker 2>her almost to a bo Burnham. He's a male comedian

0:21:19.594 --> 0:21:21.194
<v Speaker 2>of the same sort of age, and he does something

0:21:21.234 --> 0:21:23.874
<v Speaker 2>really interesting, which is he releases a special, whether it's

0:21:23.914 --> 0:21:27.234
<v Speaker 2>stand up, whether it's on Netflix, like Inside, and then

0:21:27.274 --> 0:21:32.554
<v Speaker 2>he disappears for years. Is that a privilege that's afforded

0:21:32.834 --> 0:21:36.353
<v Speaker 2>to men. I don't know, but I was thinking about, like,

0:21:36.794 --> 0:21:40.074
<v Speaker 2>you're Jerry Seinfeld, You're Larry David, You're Ricky Gervais. I

0:21:40.074 --> 0:21:44.594
<v Speaker 2>think that men are allowed to create, star in develop

0:21:44.674 --> 0:21:47.874
<v Speaker 2>these personas who are imperfect and funny and play with

0:21:47.954 --> 0:21:51.194
<v Speaker 2>that in a way that we don't allow women to.

0:21:51.274 --> 0:21:53.434
<v Speaker 2>I think there was a lot of misogyny, a lot

0:21:53.434 --> 0:21:55.834
<v Speaker 2>of fat phobia in our treatment of Lena Dunham. I

0:21:55.874 --> 0:21:59.074
<v Speaker 2>just think it's very interesting that she's been invited back

0:21:59.114 --> 0:22:00.074
<v Speaker 2>to the party.

0:21:59.914 --> 0:22:02.074
<v Speaker 1>And what I'm so glad she has. What I'm loving

0:22:02.114 --> 0:22:05.394
<v Speaker 1>about this is that jen Z seems to be able

0:22:05.474 --> 0:22:10.994
<v Speaker 1>to rediscover her and girls without bringing the subsequent baggage

0:22:11.034 --> 0:22:13.474
<v Speaker 1>to it. They can appreciate it as the brilliant show

0:22:13.514 --> 0:22:17.474
<v Speaker 1>it was and celebrate her storytelling capacity without then having

0:22:17.514 --> 0:22:20.394
<v Speaker 1>to assume that she has to mean something politically to them.

0:22:20.514 --> 0:22:22.674
<v Speaker 3>So we'll be talking more about too much. If you

0:22:22.754 --> 0:22:25.474
<v Speaker 3>want to get it into your eyes, it's on Netflix

0:22:25.554 --> 0:22:26.074
<v Speaker 3>at the moment.

0:22:26.114 --> 0:22:28.074
<v Speaker 1>You can watch all ten episodes.

0:22:28.274 --> 0:22:31.313
<v Speaker 2>In a moment. An inconvenient truth about alcohol and what

0:22:31.434 --> 0:22:38.394
<v Speaker 2>we're meant to actually do about it. Should Australia mandate

0:22:38.514 --> 0:22:42.474
<v Speaker 2>cancer warnings on alcohol? And how much labels on anything

0:22:42.634 --> 0:22:43.474
<v Speaker 2>really even matter?

0:22:44.154 --> 0:22:44.234
<v Speaker 1>So?

0:22:44.354 --> 0:22:47.034
<v Speaker 2>In January of this year, the United States Office of

0:22:47.074 --> 0:22:51.674
<v Speaker 2>the Surgeon General recommended that warnings about alcohol's cancer risks

0:22:51.954 --> 0:22:56.754
<v Speaker 2>be displayed on drink packaging. We are, as often cited,

0:22:56.834 --> 0:22:58.914
<v Speaker 2>much to Maya's disappointment, not doctors.

0:22:59.114 --> 0:22:59.954
<v Speaker 1>We're not. Man, we're not.

0:23:00.314 --> 0:23:00.634
<v Speaker 3>You're not.

0:23:01.114 --> 0:23:03.954
<v Speaker 2>But according to a study in The Lancet, alcohol is

0:23:04.034 --> 0:23:08.434
<v Speaker 2>responsible for five thousand, eight hundred new cancer cases per

0:23:08.554 --> 0:23:11.314
<v Speaker 2>year in Australia. That is more than I would have assumed.

0:23:11.914 --> 0:23:14.514
<v Speaker 2>It has been found that any level of alcohol use

0:23:14.634 --> 0:23:18.314
<v Speaker 2>increases the risk for several types of cancers. Now we're

0:23:18.314 --> 0:23:20.553
<v Speaker 2>going to leave the medical studies to the side, because

0:23:20.714 --> 0:23:24.434
<v Speaker 2>the question is how best to communicate this information given

0:23:24.514 --> 0:23:27.234
<v Speaker 2>a lot of Australians actually aren't aware of the risk.

0:23:27.834 --> 0:23:30.874
<v Speaker 2>So in Australia and the US there are warnings on alcohol,

0:23:30.994 --> 0:23:35.514
<v Speaker 2>about its impacts on unborn children and about operating heavy machinery.

0:23:35.594 --> 0:23:39.594
<v Speaker 2>Right did you know the pregnancy warning labels only became

0:23:39.634 --> 0:23:41.674
<v Speaker 2>mandatory in twenty twenty three in Australia.

0:23:41.794 --> 0:23:42.474
<v Speaker 1>Did not know that?

0:23:42.794 --> 0:23:43.954
<v Speaker 2>I thought they'd always been there.

0:23:43.994 --> 0:23:46.234
<v Speaker 1>Is that the one with the picture of the pregnant woman? Yes?

0:23:46.354 --> 0:23:46.714
<v Speaker 1>I think so.

0:23:46.914 --> 0:23:50.234
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. So Ireland is the first country to have a

0:23:50.274 --> 0:23:53.314
<v Speaker 2>mandatory cancer label on alcohol. It hasn't come in yet,

0:23:53.314 --> 0:23:56.834
<v Speaker 2>but they've made the sort of policy and Australian health

0:23:56.834 --> 0:24:00.154
<v Speaker 2>bodies want us to follow suit. My question is do

0:24:00.194 --> 0:24:04.074
<v Speaker 2>we reckon that labels make that much of a difference, Amelia,

0:24:04.074 --> 0:24:04.554
<v Speaker 2>What do you think?

0:24:04.674 --> 0:24:08.114
<v Speaker 1>I went on a real journey here because my instinct

0:24:08.194 --> 0:24:10.474
<v Speaker 1>was to say, no, they're white noise and we tune

0:24:10.474 --> 0:24:14.513
<v Speaker 1>them out and we want the drink. But then I

0:24:14.554 --> 0:24:17.434
<v Speaker 1>read about California. So when you go to California, you

0:24:17.474 --> 0:24:21.914
<v Speaker 1>see labels everywhere. They're on like everything from pleather jackets

0:24:21.954 --> 0:24:24.714
<v Speaker 1>to drink cans, like like soda cans.

0:24:25.554 --> 0:24:26.674
<v Speaker 2>What kind of labels?

0:24:26.754 --> 0:24:31.074
<v Speaker 1>Subway seats there are these huge labels that say, essentially,

0:24:31.154 --> 0:24:35.634
<v Speaker 1>this product may cause cancer. I cannot stress how widespread

0:24:35.714 --> 0:24:37.474
<v Speaker 1>these labels are. But what do you like on a

0:24:37.514 --> 0:24:38.274
<v Speaker 1>subway seat?

0:24:38.354 --> 0:24:40.114
<v Speaker 3>Yes, because of the plastic that's used.

0:24:40.154 --> 0:24:42.273
<v Speaker 1>Because of the plastics. So there was this law in

0:24:42.354 --> 0:24:46.273
<v Speaker 1>nineteen eighty six which basically identified nine hundred chemicals that

0:24:46.354 --> 0:24:49.154
<v Speaker 1>could be carcinogenic. So it was a pretty low bar,

0:24:49.834 --> 0:24:53.714
<v Speaker 1>and they decided to slap these giant labels on any

0:24:53.834 --> 0:24:57.394
<v Speaker 1>product that contain these chemicals. We're talking big labels too.

0:24:57.474 --> 0:24:59.553
<v Speaker 2>See my response to that, I imagine that if I

0:24:59.674 --> 0:25:02.394
<v Speaker 2>lived in that context, I would stop seeing it. And

0:25:02.594 --> 0:25:04.834
<v Speaker 2>I'm feeling this already, that there's a new study every

0:25:04.874 --> 0:25:07.594
<v Speaker 2>day about a new castinogen, and I just have to go, Okay,

0:25:07.634 --> 0:25:09.314
<v Speaker 2>everything's carcinogenic. I'm not taking it.

0:25:09.394 --> 0:25:11.874
<v Speaker 1>That's exactly what I assume too, because as a consumer,

0:25:12.034 --> 0:25:13.513
<v Speaker 1>what can you do about it? So you get a

0:25:13.554 --> 0:25:15.354
<v Speaker 1>car seat, for instance, you rent a car and you

0:25:15.354 --> 0:25:17.354
<v Speaker 1>get a car seat, and on the car seat is

0:25:17.394 --> 0:25:19.874
<v Speaker 1>a giant label that says that the car seat that,

0:25:19.954 --> 0:25:21.874
<v Speaker 1>by the way, you are legally mandated to put in

0:25:21.914 --> 0:25:24.514
<v Speaker 1>the car and news may cause cancer. And you think

0:25:24.514 --> 0:25:27.314
<v Speaker 1>to yourself, well, that's unfortunate because I have to use it. Yeah,

0:25:27.874 --> 0:25:32.154
<v Speaker 1>but it turns out that they've had this unexpected consequence

0:25:32.194 --> 0:25:34.554
<v Speaker 1>that no one was really thinking about. So there was

0:25:34.594 --> 0:25:36.874
<v Speaker 1>a recent study done that said, let's look into what

0:25:37.194 --> 0:25:40.234
<v Speaker 1>sort of effects these labels have had, and they talked

0:25:40.234 --> 0:25:43.074
<v Speaker 1>to both consumers and to companies. And you're right about

0:25:43.074 --> 0:25:45.954
<v Speaker 1>the consumers because again, using the car seat example, there's

0:25:45.994 --> 0:25:47.594
<v Speaker 1>nothing I can really do about it. I have to

0:25:47.674 --> 0:25:49.994
<v Speaker 1>use the car seat unless they fashioned one out of bamboo,

0:25:50.034 --> 0:25:52.553
<v Speaker 1>which I don't think would be legal. Legal. Yeah, So

0:25:52.594 --> 0:25:55.234
<v Speaker 1>they are the companies. And it turns out that eighty

0:25:55.274 --> 0:25:58.674
<v Speaker 1>percent of the companies that this survey interviewed said that

0:25:58.714 --> 0:26:01.634
<v Speaker 1>the law had prompted them to reformulate their products. So

0:26:01.674 --> 0:26:04.273
<v Speaker 1>think about, for instance, nail polish remover, like, yes, you

0:26:04.314 --> 0:26:06.714
<v Speaker 1>can make it with the carcinogenic substance, or you can

0:26:06.754 --> 0:26:10.154
<v Speaker 1>try and something else that maybe doesn't cause cancer. And

0:26:10.274 --> 0:26:12.033
<v Speaker 1>so what I think is fascinating about this in the

0:26:12.034 --> 0:26:14.794
<v Speaker 1>context of this debate about Australia and the labels and alcohol,

0:26:15.514 --> 0:26:19.234
<v Speaker 1>is that obviously you know something either has alcohol or

0:26:19.274 --> 0:26:21.553
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't. It's a little bit different. But on the

0:26:21.554 --> 0:26:24.073
<v Speaker 1>other hand, I think we are seeing a trend towards

0:26:24.114 --> 0:26:29.154
<v Speaker 1>people wanting lower alcohol beverages or maybe even those fancy

0:26:29.194 --> 0:26:32.914
<v Speaker 1>non alcoholic beverages that people are increasingly using for mocktails

0:26:33.154 --> 0:26:36.833
<v Speaker 1>and as a substitute in social events. So I wonder

0:26:36.954 --> 0:26:39.834
<v Speaker 1>if it is going to prompt companies to innovate more

0:26:39.954 --> 0:26:42.914
<v Speaker 1>to make lower alcohols or no alcohols, like a phoney

0:26:42.914 --> 0:26:45.074
<v Speaker 1>Negroni for instance. That could be a positive.

0:26:45.234 --> 0:26:47.874
<v Speaker 2>This is also being discussed in the US around highly

0:26:47.954 --> 0:26:51.274
<v Speaker 2>processed food and wanting to have clear labels about what's

0:26:51.314 --> 0:26:54.754
<v Speaker 2>in the food, and it has been adopted in places

0:26:54.754 --> 0:26:57.874
<v Speaker 2>in South America and apparently has had an impact on

0:26:58.674 --> 0:27:02.274
<v Speaker 2>firstly the knowledge and secondly the choice whether or not

0:27:02.474 --> 0:27:05.154
<v Speaker 2>to buy it. I think Australia has sort of messed

0:27:05.154 --> 0:27:07.434
<v Speaker 2>this up a bit with the Health Star rating because

0:27:07.474 --> 0:27:09.514
<v Speaker 2>I've started to ignore that. Do you actually take any

0:27:09.554 --> 0:27:10.634
<v Speaker 2>notice of the health Star rating?

0:27:10.754 --> 0:27:10.794
<v Speaker 4>No?

0:27:11.354 --> 0:27:13.954
<v Speaker 1>And in fact, my child looks at the snack and

0:27:13.994 --> 0:27:16.954
<v Speaker 1>it has one star, and yes, well, it's got a star.

0:27:17.274 --> 0:27:19.234
<v Speaker 2>It's got a star. And what a lot of people

0:27:19.234 --> 0:27:21.634
<v Speaker 2>don't know about your health star rating is that it's

0:27:21.634 --> 0:27:23.793
<v Speaker 2>been compared to other foods in the same category. So

0:27:23.834 --> 0:27:26.674
<v Speaker 2>you're not comparing yoga and chips. You're comparing chips and chips.

0:27:26.834 --> 0:27:29.354
<v Speaker 2>So your four star actually isn't healthy, right.

0:27:29.394 --> 0:27:30.834
<v Speaker 1>So it's interesting. I didn't know that.

0:27:30.954 --> 0:27:32.954
<v Speaker 2>So there are some labels that I've stopped seeing. But

0:27:32.994 --> 0:27:36.313
<v Speaker 2>the difference with alcohol, I was thinking, is most of

0:27:36.314 --> 0:27:39.794
<v Speaker 2>the context in which I consume alcohol, I have absolutely

0:27:39.834 --> 0:27:43.314
<v Speaker 2>no proximity to the label. So I am at a bar,

0:27:43.594 --> 0:27:45.954
<v Speaker 2>a restaurant, even if I'm at work and someone pours

0:27:45.954 --> 0:27:47.634
<v Speaker 2>me a drink, I'm at dinner and someone pours me

0:27:47.674 --> 0:27:50.554
<v Speaker 2>a drink. My behavior around alcohol is that I don't

0:27:50.594 --> 0:27:54.074
<v Speaker 2>generally have it in my house. But I wonder if

0:27:54.114 --> 0:27:57.914
<v Speaker 2>that's going to make any difference if it's being poured

0:27:57.954 --> 0:28:00.674
<v Speaker 2>at a venue. Whereas with cigarettes, for example, where we

0:28:00.714 --> 0:28:03.234
<v Speaker 2>know that the label had made a big difference, there's

0:28:03.274 --> 0:28:05.994
<v Speaker 2>no such thing as getting a cigarette as distinct from

0:28:06.034 --> 0:28:08.634
<v Speaker 2>its packaging, you know what I mean? Like alcohol exists

0:28:08.674 --> 0:28:12.034
<v Speaker 2>is a very specific type of consumer good in that

0:28:12.114 --> 0:28:14.794
<v Speaker 2>often it's not linked to its packaging, so I would

0:28:14.834 --> 0:28:18.554
<v Speaker 2>never see that label, Like do you read labels on things?

0:28:18.954 --> 0:28:19.073
<v Speaker 1>Like?

0:28:19.114 --> 0:28:21.434
<v Speaker 3>I don't read the fine print, But if it's an

0:28:21.514 --> 0:28:25.394
<v Speaker 3>actual label, yeah, I mean I do. I guess I

0:28:25.514 --> 0:28:28.714
<v Speaker 3>do if it's warning me of something. I'm also a

0:28:28.714 --> 0:28:31.394
<v Speaker 3>little bit wary, you know. I like being educated. I

0:28:31.554 --> 0:28:34.834
<v Speaker 3>like knowing so that I've got choice. I think that

0:28:34.874 --> 0:28:37.274
<v Speaker 3>a lot of people don't know the connection between alcohol

0:28:37.354 --> 0:28:41.114
<v Speaker 3>and cancer. Everyone knows the connection between cigarettes and cancer.

0:28:41.674 --> 0:28:44.634
<v Speaker 3>But I don't think that's a bad thing.

0:28:45.034 --> 0:28:49.714
<v Speaker 2>I wonder too, if the cigarettes and the alcohol. So,

0:28:49.834 --> 0:28:52.154
<v Speaker 2>for example, the two messages on alcohol at the moment

0:28:52.194 --> 0:28:55.354
<v Speaker 2>are about pregnancy and unbond baby and operating heavy machinery.

0:28:55.434 --> 0:28:55.594
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:28:56.274 --> 0:28:59.674
<v Speaker 2>There is enormous stigma about those two things, and the

0:28:59.794 --> 0:29:03.554
<v Speaker 2>stigma I think comes from it impacting another person.

0:29:03.914 --> 0:29:04.554
<v Speaker 1>Ah, that's fair.

0:29:04.714 --> 0:29:07.274
<v Speaker 2>So if I sit there at the pub and my

0:29:07.314 --> 0:29:09.794
<v Speaker 2>friend has had four drinks and picks up their car

0:29:09.874 --> 0:29:12.794
<v Speaker 2>keys horrified, you simply wouldn't let it happen. And that's

0:29:12.874 --> 0:29:15.034
<v Speaker 2>been a change in a generation. That's been a really

0:29:15.154 --> 0:29:17.274
<v Speaker 2>positive thing. Same with drinking. The idea that you would

0:29:17.634 --> 0:29:19.634
<v Speaker 2>if a heavily pregnant person was sitting there with the

0:29:19.634 --> 0:29:22.354
<v Speaker 2>bottle of wine in front of her, you'd get looks.

0:29:23.274 --> 0:29:26.434
<v Speaker 2>But cancer impacts you, and so I wonder if there

0:29:26.434 --> 0:29:29.794
<v Speaker 2>will ever be the same amount of stigma around that

0:29:30.234 --> 0:29:33.794
<v Speaker 2>even with cigarettes. My issue with people smoking in public

0:29:33.874 --> 0:29:37.274
<v Speaker 2>is the passive smoke of like it impacting people around them,

0:29:37.274 --> 0:29:37.794
<v Speaker 2>you know what I mean.

0:29:37.914 --> 0:29:40.394
<v Speaker 3>I'd be interested to know whether the because obviously the

0:29:40.394 --> 0:29:44.034
<v Speaker 3>photos that are on cigarette packets are extreme and they're

0:29:44.034 --> 0:29:46.594
<v Speaker 3>not like your regular warning label. They're very, very graphic.

0:29:47.314 --> 0:29:50.634
<v Speaker 3>I know that some people have actually black humor, name

0:29:50.874 --> 0:29:54.674
<v Speaker 3>the people and name the photos, and there's a sort

0:29:54.674 --> 0:29:57.594
<v Speaker 3>of a oh, this is Jerry with the lungs, or

0:29:57.634 --> 0:30:00.274
<v Speaker 3>this is you know, Jane with the fingers, whatever it is.

0:30:01.434 --> 0:30:03.394
<v Speaker 3>But it would be probably hard to measure that because

0:30:03.434 --> 0:30:05.994
<v Speaker 3>over the same period of time, the price of cigarettes

0:30:06.034 --> 0:30:07.394
<v Speaker 3>has gone up a huge.

0:30:07.354 --> 0:30:08.514
<v Speaker 2>And advertising was pulled.

0:30:08.634 --> 0:30:11.074
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, which is a different kind of detern.

0:30:11.114 --> 0:30:13.434
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a really interesting point. You make me out.

0:30:13.434 --> 0:30:15.434
<v Speaker 1>I'm a bit stuck on it, the idea that we

0:30:15.554 --> 0:30:21.634
<v Speaker 1>all now understand that cigarettes cause cancer. We read articles

0:30:21.674 --> 0:30:25.834
<v Speaker 1>just constantly telling us about the direct links between alcohol

0:30:25.914 --> 0:30:27.794
<v Speaker 1>and cancer. Why do you think it's been so hard

0:30:27.834 --> 0:30:29.954
<v Speaker 1>for us to internalize that as a society.

0:30:30.314 --> 0:30:33.474
<v Speaker 3>I think that alcohol is so much part of our

0:30:34.114 --> 0:30:41.194
<v Speaker 3>culture and so connected to celebrations, whereas they don't have

0:30:41.234 --> 0:30:43.594
<v Speaker 3>a celebratory cigarette. I mean, you know, there used to

0:30:43.594 --> 0:30:45.914
<v Speaker 3>be that cliche after really good sex, you know, people

0:30:45.954 --> 0:30:48.874
<v Speaker 3>would say, I feel like a cigarette. But it's not like, Oh,

0:30:49.034 --> 0:30:51.074
<v Speaker 3>it's you've got a promotion at work, let's all have

0:30:51.154 --> 0:30:51.874
<v Speaker 3>a cigarette.

0:30:52.714 --> 0:30:56.194
<v Speaker 1>There's never been that row and it's your one cigarette

0:30:56.234 --> 0:30:56.834
<v Speaker 1>a week. Yeah.

0:30:56.954 --> 0:31:00.554
<v Speaker 2>That smoking I think was that widespread in say my parents' generation,

0:31:00.674 --> 0:31:02.914
<v Speaker 2>like it was something that everyone did, and you see

0:31:02.954 --> 0:31:05.714
<v Speaker 2>it even in films. It's like the easiest way for

0:31:05.794 --> 0:31:08.554
<v Speaker 2>them to sit to wait themselves. Within the context of

0:31:08.594 --> 0:31:11.114
<v Speaker 2>the seventies is that everyone has a cigarette in I've.

0:31:10.914 --> 0:31:14.274
<v Speaker 3>Seen a lot more smoking in popular culture, like on

0:31:14.474 --> 0:31:17.634
<v Speaker 3>and just like that, for example, the way same as smokes,

0:31:17.634 --> 0:31:19.314
<v Speaker 3>the way carry sometimes smokes.

0:31:19.354 --> 0:31:22.394
<v Speaker 1>There's also been this wishful thinking about the idea that

0:31:22.514 --> 0:31:25.754
<v Speaker 1>young people are going to understand just how bad alcohol

0:31:25.954 --> 0:31:28.754
<v Speaker 1>is and not drink, And there's been this rising trend

0:31:28.754 --> 0:31:31.874
<v Speaker 1>of articles about how gen z have rejected alcohol as

0:31:31.874 --> 0:31:35.434
<v Speaker 1>a social lubricant in the way that past generations loved it.

0:31:35.434 --> 0:31:37.954
<v Speaker 1>It turns out that really was just wishful thinking. A

0:31:37.994 --> 0:31:40.754
<v Speaker 1>new report and the Financial Times says that seventy three

0:31:40.794 --> 0:31:44.234
<v Speaker 1>percent of Gen Z admitted to consuming alcohol in the

0:31:44.274 --> 0:31:46.954
<v Speaker 1>past six months. And so it turns out the reason

0:31:46.994 --> 0:31:49.354
<v Speaker 1>why they weren't drinking was because they weren't in the

0:31:49.394 --> 0:31:51.674
<v Speaker 1>workforce and they didn't have money to spend on alcohol.

0:31:51.834 --> 0:31:54.394
<v Speaker 1>But now that they're aging into the workforce and earning

0:31:54.394 --> 0:31:56.794
<v Speaker 1>real money, it turns out that they like a drink

0:31:56.874 --> 0:31:59.634
<v Speaker 1>just as much as any other generation. I think it's

0:31:59.674 --> 0:32:02.114
<v Speaker 1>time for a bit of scurrillous gossip, just to lighten

0:32:02.114 --> 0:32:05.314
<v Speaker 1>the mood here a little bit. Prince Harry and King

0:32:05.434 --> 0:32:08.994
<v Speaker 1>Charles may be working towards making amends, and I am

0:32:09.154 --> 0:32:11.954
<v Speaker 1>so relieved. I've been very worried about this.

0:32:12.114 --> 0:32:13.794
<v Speaker 2>What do we know about this? Because I saw the

0:32:13.834 --> 0:32:16.754
<v Speaker 2>headlines over the weekend, what steps have been taken?

0:32:16.834 --> 0:32:19.914
<v Speaker 1>It's actually not even that scurrilous. There's photos. So the

0:32:19.954 --> 0:32:22.554
<v Speaker 1>Mail on Sunday had the scoop. They said that the

0:32:22.594 --> 0:32:25.234
<v Speaker 1>Monarch and the Duke of Sussex's aides met for a

0:32:25.274 --> 0:32:28.714
<v Speaker 1>secret peace summit in London last week and there were

0:32:28.714 --> 0:32:32.394
<v Speaker 1>photos in fact of these high level officials leaving the meeting.

0:32:32.674 --> 0:32:35.194
<v Speaker 1>So It took place at a place called the Royal

0:32:35.354 --> 0:32:38.874
<v Speaker 1>Overseas League. That is a private members club that was

0:32:38.914 --> 0:32:43.274
<v Speaker 1>set up to promote wait for it, international friendship. Oh

0:32:43.314 --> 0:32:47.074
<v Speaker 1>across the pond overseass two words for some reason, and

0:32:47.114 --> 0:32:49.794
<v Speaker 1>I can just smell the other bound books in their car.

0:32:50.914 --> 0:32:53.354
<v Speaker 1>It was very the Crown. I want to go to

0:32:53.394 --> 0:32:56.914
<v Speaker 1>their people, shaman might say, who is there? So I'm

0:32:56.914 --> 0:32:59.074
<v Speaker 1>glad you asked that, mere because we've got their names.

0:32:59.154 --> 0:33:03.474
<v Speaker 1>Meredith Mains who was Prince Harry's new CEO, Liam McGuire,

0:33:03.674 --> 0:33:06.354
<v Speaker 1>who was the Sussex's pr lead. That's a busy job,

0:33:06.434 --> 0:33:11.594
<v Speaker 1>isn't it. And Tobin Andre who was King Charles's communications secretary.

0:33:11.634 --> 0:33:15.114
<v Speaker 1>Now what I really want to know is who leaked this?

0:33:15.234 --> 0:33:17.634
<v Speaker 1>Which side do you think has more interest in leaking

0:33:17.674 --> 0:33:18.834
<v Speaker 1>that these talks are happening?

0:33:18.954 --> 0:33:20.354
<v Speaker 2>May I the're the pr expert.

0:33:20.474 --> 0:33:22.914
<v Speaker 3>I think it was a joint decision to leak it,

0:33:22.994 --> 0:33:26.034
<v Speaker 3>because it's almost a leak off, right. I imagine that

0:33:26.154 --> 0:33:28.914
<v Speaker 3>the terms and conditions by which this meeting and any

0:33:28.954 --> 0:33:32.194
<v Speaker 3>future meetings would happen, because part of the reason they

0:33:32.194 --> 0:33:35.154
<v Speaker 3>haven't happened until now is because no one trusts the

0:33:35.194 --> 0:33:40.234
<v Speaker 3>Sussexes anymore because every text message, every phone call, every conversation,

0:33:40.394 --> 0:33:44.274
<v Speaker 3>a lot of these really private exchanges have become fodder

0:33:44.314 --> 0:33:48.394
<v Speaker 3>for interviews, for books, for Netflix documentaries. So I think

0:33:48.434 --> 0:33:53.114
<v Speaker 3>for anyone to feel safe having these conversations, the leaking

0:33:53.194 --> 0:33:56.074
<v Speaker 3>policy would have had to be very much laid out,

0:33:56.074 --> 0:33:58.114
<v Speaker 3>So I think it was probably mutual decision.

0:33:58.554 --> 0:34:02.594
<v Speaker 1>I also think Harry has a real incentive here to

0:34:02.714 --> 0:34:05.074
<v Speaker 1>patch things up fast. Now I'm going to get a

0:34:05.074 --> 0:34:07.754
<v Speaker 1>little bit pragmatic and maybe a little bit more, but

0:34:07.874 --> 0:34:11.433
<v Speaker 1>about this, Charles is in his mid seventies. By all accounts,

0:34:11.674 --> 0:34:15.274
<v Speaker 1>William is determined not to let Harry get away with

0:34:15.514 --> 0:34:18.634
<v Speaker 1>any of this royal ish funny business anymore. So for

0:34:18.634 --> 0:34:22.034
<v Speaker 1>instance calling himself the Duke of Sussex. Jamie Kern Lee

0:34:22.114 --> 0:34:25.034
<v Speaker 1>mckho was the first person to have Megan on a

0:34:25.074 --> 0:34:28.953
<v Speaker 1>podcast as an interview guest showed on her Instagram that

0:34:28.994 --> 0:34:33.234
<v Speaker 1>Meghan had sent her a gift using the HRH nomenclature,

0:34:33.434 --> 0:34:36.914
<v Speaker 1>which William is simply not going to allow. So when

0:34:37.194 --> 0:34:42.154
<v Speaker 1>William becomes king, all these royal sort of trappings are

0:34:42.154 --> 0:34:45.554
<v Speaker 1>going to go away. So I think what Harry wants

0:34:45.594 --> 0:34:48.514
<v Speaker 1>to do is shore up what he can use and

0:34:48.554 --> 0:34:52.074
<v Speaker 1>what he can't use now, because soon enough it's going

0:34:52.154 --> 0:34:54.154
<v Speaker 1>to be very hard for him to get away with it.

0:34:54.234 --> 0:34:56.034
<v Speaker 3>He's so completely excommunicated.

0:34:56.154 --> 0:34:59.114
<v Speaker 2>As soon as I saw this headline, my first reaction

0:34:59.394 --> 0:35:03.114
<v Speaker 2>was concerned for Charles because I went, oh, he's sicker

0:35:03.114 --> 0:35:05.913
<v Speaker 2>than we thought because he was diagnosed with cancer in

0:35:06.274 --> 0:35:09.474
<v Speaker 2>February last We do not know what type of cancer

0:35:09.514 --> 0:35:13.874
<v Speaker 2>that is still there was Also, when Harry recently did

0:35:13.914 --> 0:35:17.274
<v Speaker 2>that interview following the court case, he said, I.

0:35:17.234 --> 0:35:19.234
<v Speaker 3>Don't know how long my father, Yeah, but they were

0:35:19.314 --> 0:35:20.393
<v Speaker 3>very upset about that.

0:35:20.434 --> 0:35:21.314
<v Speaker 2>They weren't set about that.

0:35:21.434 --> 0:35:24.994
<v Speaker 3>Firstly, he doesn't know, and secondly that's a pretty awful

0:35:24.994 --> 0:35:25.674
<v Speaker 3>thing to say.

0:35:25.714 --> 0:35:28.034
<v Speaker 2>But for Charles to come to the table here, I

0:35:28.194 --> 0:35:31.754
<v Speaker 2>just thought, there is nothing like mortality to kind of

0:35:31.914 --> 0:35:34.994
<v Speaker 2>bring potential or an attempt at reconciliation.

0:35:35.274 --> 0:35:37.953
<v Speaker 3>You know who wasn't represented at that meeting, William No.

0:35:38.074 --> 0:35:40.074
<v Speaker 1>And nor will he after the break?

0:35:40.114 --> 0:35:43.393
<v Speaker 3>Has posting on Instagram and Facebook become cringe? And are

0:35:43.394 --> 0:35:45.154
<v Speaker 3>we heading towards posting zero?

0:35:46.034 --> 0:35:49.994
<v Speaker 2>What unlimited out loud access? We drop episodes every Tuesday

0:35:49.994 --> 0:35:54.234
<v Speaker 2>and Thursday exclusively for Mum and Maya subscribers. Follow the

0:35:54.274 --> 0:35:56.154
<v Speaker 2>link in the show notes to get us in your

0:35:56.194 --> 0:35:58.994
<v Speaker 2>ears five days a week, and a huge thank you

0:35:59.154 --> 0:36:05.354
<v Speaker 2>to all our current subscribers.

0:36:06.874 --> 0:36:09.433
<v Speaker 4>I just came back from Greece, so I definitely would

0:36:09.434 --> 0:36:12.794
<v Speaker 4>say I insufferably overposted on that holiday, both grid posts

0:36:12.834 --> 0:36:16.154
<v Speaker 4>and stories. Most of the time, though I probably consistently

0:36:16.154 --> 0:36:20.433
<v Speaker 4>post Instagram stories grid posts probably more, maybe once every

0:36:20.474 --> 0:36:21.114
<v Speaker 4>two weeks.

0:36:21.554 --> 0:36:23.554
<v Speaker 5>I do not post a lot to my main kind

0:36:23.554 --> 0:36:25.754
<v Speaker 5>of like Instagram or TikTok feeds. But what I do

0:36:25.874 --> 0:36:28.114
<v Speaker 5>use social media for a lot more is stories. I

0:36:28.154 --> 0:36:30.634
<v Speaker 5>kind of like that it's temporary and there's less pressure

0:36:30.674 --> 0:36:32.474
<v Speaker 5>I feel to get it right. You don't have to

0:36:32.514 --> 0:36:34.794
<v Speaker 5>curate anything, you don't have to get a caption. It

0:36:34.834 --> 0:36:37.354
<v Speaker 5>can just be a lot simpler. So I do not

0:36:37.434 --> 0:36:40.074
<v Speaker 5>post regularly on social media. Maybe once a year if that.

0:36:40.514 --> 0:36:42.474
<v Speaker 5>If we've been on holidays and I want to post

0:36:42.514 --> 0:36:45.474
<v Speaker 5>a photo, I feel this weird pressure about getting the

0:36:45.474 --> 0:36:47.393
<v Speaker 5>caption right and do I need to ask a friend

0:36:47.394 --> 0:36:48.194
<v Speaker 5>to edit the lighting?

0:36:48.274 --> 0:36:49.993
<v Speaker 1>And like, who am I.

0:36:49.914 --> 0:36:50.433
<v Speaker 4>Doing this for?

0:36:50.714 --> 0:36:53.194
<v Speaker 5>Because I don't care, and in my real life I.

0:36:53.114 --> 0:36:56.314
<v Speaker 3>Don't care if you know anybody who's on holidays at

0:36:56.314 --> 0:37:00.274
<v Speaker 3>the moment, particularly in Europe. You might be struck by

0:37:00.914 --> 0:37:04.234
<v Speaker 3>how surprising it is to see this almost retro use

0:37:04.274 --> 0:37:07.794
<v Speaker 3>of social media where they're posting his what I ate

0:37:07.834 --> 0:37:12.594
<v Speaker 3>for lunch, Here's me in front of a landmark, Here's

0:37:12.914 --> 0:37:15.314
<v Speaker 3>what I bought in a shop. I've got a few

0:37:15.354 --> 0:37:18.433
<v Speaker 3>friends who are overseas at the moment, and it's such

0:37:18.434 --> 0:37:21.514
<v Speaker 3>a stark contrast because it feels like what social media

0:37:21.914 --> 0:37:25.034
<v Speaker 3>isn't anymore. And I only realized that when I started

0:37:25.034 --> 0:37:28.794
<v Speaker 3>seeing those photos again. As social media has evolved, the

0:37:28.834 --> 0:37:33.873
<v Speaker 3>baseline expectation for posting keeps rising. We've been posting, well

0:37:33.914 --> 0:37:37.954
<v Speaker 3>some of us for fifteen years now, and it started

0:37:37.994 --> 0:37:41.634
<v Speaker 3>off with sort of dashed off tweets. Then it became

0:37:41.954 --> 0:37:46.634
<v Speaker 3>carefully composed Instagram photos, which were replaced in turn by

0:37:46.674 --> 0:37:51.674
<v Speaker 3>TikTok clips, which are increasingly showing the production value of television.

0:37:52.154 --> 0:37:54.514
<v Speaker 3>Have you noticed that it's now and you flick through,

0:37:55.354 --> 0:37:58.913
<v Speaker 3>everything's moving towards short form video content. So there's very

0:37:58.954 --> 0:38:02.794
<v Speaker 3>few pictures of people's breakfasts, very few pictures of sunsets,

0:38:03.434 --> 0:38:07.674
<v Speaker 3>very few pictures of people's dogs or selfies or their families.

0:38:08.514 --> 0:38:11.074
<v Speaker 3>And women, we know that women are posting less and

0:38:11.154 --> 0:38:14.154
<v Speaker 3>lurking more and there are three. There are actually four

0:38:14.194 --> 0:38:16.034
<v Speaker 3>reasons for this, which I'm just quickly going to go

0:38:16.074 --> 0:38:17.994
<v Speaker 3>through and tell me if any of these resonate with you.

0:38:18.834 --> 0:38:21.674
<v Speaker 3>The first one is with everything going on in the world,

0:38:21.914 --> 0:38:24.714
<v Speaker 3>a lot of which we see via social thanks to

0:38:24.754 --> 0:38:29.594
<v Speaker 3>the algorithm, people are feeling self conscious about posting just

0:38:29.674 --> 0:38:35.154
<v Speaker 3>sort of mundane, benign updates about their life because you know,

0:38:35.194 --> 0:38:38.154
<v Speaker 3>there's a lot of shouting and a lot of assumptions

0:38:38.154 --> 0:38:40.393
<v Speaker 3>are being made by what you don't post.

0:38:40.154 --> 0:38:41.234
<v Speaker 1>Or what you do post.

0:38:41.354 --> 0:38:44.914
<v Speaker 2>I think specifically in a context where there is discussions

0:38:44.954 --> 0:38:47.634
<v Speaker 2>around Gaza and what is happening in the US with

0:38:47.874 --> 0:38:51.794
<v Speaker 2>Ice at the moment, that anything you post does look

0:38:51.834 --> 0:38:54.194
<v Speaker 2>tone deaf beside the worst thing happening in the world

0:38:54.314 --> 0:38:58.033
<v Speaker 2>right now, and therefore people are sort of opting out

0:38:58.314 --> 0:39:03.714
<v Speaker 2>whether you post or you don't post, that will be weaponized.

0:39:03.874 --> 0:39:07.354
<v Speaker 3>Because those things didn't used to be on Instagram so much,

0:39:07.394 --> 0:39:10.314
<v Speaker 3>but now there's so many brands posting and creators and

0:39:10.354 --> 0:39:14.473
<v Speaker 3>influencers they've sort of taken over, and news brands as well.

0:39:14.794 --> 0:39:18.674
<v Speaker 3>The second reason, which I alluded to earlier reels it's

0:39:18.714 --> 0:39:21.274
<v Speaker 3>now whether it's on TikTok or whether it's on Instagram,

0:39:21.514 --> 0:39:25.274
<v Speaker 3>even on Facebook, people are posting these kind of movie

0:39:25.354 --> 0:39:29.954
<v Speaker 3>trailer production quality values, and social is a place of

0:39:29.994 --> 0:39:33.314
<v Speaker 3>work for a lot of people, influencers, creators, and brands.

0:39:33.714 --> 0:39:35.754
<v Speaker 3>So these are big budgets. It takes a lot of

0:39:35.794 --> 0:39:40.794
<v Speaker 3>time to edit and produce and film these reels, and.

0:39:40.754 --> 0:39:43.194
<v Speaker 1>Not everybody's up to it, right, And that's not an accident.

0:39:43.434 --> 0:39:46.074
<v Speaker 2>I think, as you say, the average person, women are

0:39:46.354 --> 0:39:49.234
<v Speaker 2>posting less and less, and that is because of a

0:39:49.434 --> 0:39:53.393
<v Speaker 2>very intentional algorithm change that happened, which was we are

0:39:53.474 --> 0:39:58.034
<v Speaker 2>going to present your content to strangers. This is no

0:39:58.074 --> 0:40:01.393
<v Speaker 2>longer about friends engaging. Mark Zuckerberg has talked about that

0:40:01.914 --> 0:40:04.314
<v Speaker 2>on Instagram. Initially it was like I was sharing with

0:40:04.354 --> 0:40:07.594
<v Speaker 2>my community, and now it's been like who.

0:40:07.514 --> 0:40:08.433
<v Speaker 1>Chose to follow you?

0:40:08.914 --> 0:40:11.274
<v Speaker 3>Now they were interested in what Jesse had for breakfast,

0:40:11.314 --> 0:40:12.594
<v Speaker 3>or maybe that you've got a haircut.

0:40:12.674 --> 0:40:16.034
<v Speaker 2>Now you're performing to strangers. And therefore it is the

0:40:16.034 --> 0:40:21.953
<v Speaker 2>erasure of context, which brings it back to your I

0:40:21.954 --> 0:40:24.554
<v Speaker 2>suppose either you post about everything all of the time

0:40:24.994 --> 0:40:26.074
<v Speaker 2>or you post about nothing.

0:40:26.354 --> 0:40:29.434
<v Speaker 3>That context is really important. And that's the next point

0:40:29.594 --> 0:40:31.794
<v Speaker 3>is that millennials who grew up on social media. Like

0:40:31.834 --> 0:40:36.234
<v Speaker 3>you two, you're moving into middle age and seeking more

0:40:36.234 --> 0:40:39.114
<v Speaker 3>privacy in your lives. You don't want to be perceived

0:40:39.154 --> 0:40:42.514
<v Speaker 3>all the time, that sense of I don't want to

0:40:42.554 --> 0:40:45.514
<v Speaker 3>show the world what I'm doing. It's almost like everybody's

0:40:45.554 --> 0:40:48.473
<v Speaker 3>woken up from this collective fever dream of why were

0:40:48.514 --> 0:40:52.354
<v Speaker 3>we just sharing all the private moments from our lives?

0:40:52.794 --> 0:40:55.154
<v Speaker 3>Firstly with a bunch of people who we might you know,

0:40:55.394 --> 0:40:56.913
<v Speaker 3>the person who went to school with, or an ex

0:40:56.994 --> 0:40:58.914
<v Speaker 3>boyfriend or an ex boyfriend's mother.

0:40:58.794 --> 0:40:59.754
<v Speaker 1>That still follows you.

0:41:00.354 --> 0:41:02.314
<v Speaker 3>And now it's literally why would I want to share

0:41:02.354 --> 0:41:04.994
<v Speaker 3>those things with strangers? And that idea of being perceived

0:41:05.034 --> 0:41:07.554
<v Speaker 3>by people either who you don't know very well or

0:41:07.674 --> 0:41:11.554
<v Speaker 3>you don't at all. And then the fourth reason is

0:41:11.834 --> 0:41:15.754
<v Speaker 3>group chats. This is relatively new over the last few years.

0:41:16.074 --> 0:41:18.714
<v Speaker 3>If you wanted to share an observation about something, a

0:41:18.754 --> 0:41:21.114
<v Speaker 3>picture about something, some news that you've got a promotion,

0:41:21.434 --> 0:41:23.834
<v Speaker 3>or that you'd had to put your dog down, you

0:41:23.874 --> 0:41:27.354
<v Speaker 3>would do that on social media. Now you're much more

0:41:27.394 --> 0:41:28.714
<v Speaker 3>likely to do it in a group chat.

0:41:28.754 --> 0:41:32.074
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a fifth reason ai as Ai scraped

0:41:32.114 --> 0:41:35.034
<v Speaker 1>the internet for fodder. People are understanding you don't want

0:41:35.034 --> 0:41:36.914
<v Speaker 1>to put your baby photo up there because your baby's

0:41:36.914 --> 0:41:39.034
<v Speaker 1>going to end up being used by AI to make

0:41:39.074 --> 0:41:40.554
<v Speaker 1>a completely unrelated video.

0:41:40.994 --> 0:41:44.394
<v Speaker 3>So Jesse, I was reading this amazing piece about posting

0:41:44.434 --> 0:41:46.434
<v Speaker 3>on we which is kind of like everyone's feeling a

0:41:46.474 --> 0:41:47.434
<v Speaker 3>bit weird about posting.

0:41:47.674 --> 0:41:49.114
<v Speaker 1>It was in The New Yorker this week.

0:41:49.554 --> 0:41:51.433
<v Speaker 3>I certainly feel that way. I used to do insta

0:41:51.474 --> 0:41:53.354
<v Speaker 3>babbles on Instagram all the time, where I just sort

0:41:53.394 --> 0:41:56.074
<v Speaker 3>of chat, you know, spontaneously while I put my makeup

0:41:56.074 --> 0:41:58.754
<v Speaker 3>on a couple of months ago, I felt uncomfortable about

0:41:58.754 --> 0:42:01.433
<v Speaker 3>doing that, and I stopped doing that. And I used

0:42:01.434 --> 0:42:04.874
<v Speaker 3>to post lots of sort of getting ready videos and stuff.

0:42:04.914 --> 0:42:07.714
<v Speaker 3>I don't do that anymore. And I loved the idea

0:42:07.794 --> 0:42:11.474
<v Speaker 3>of understanding why. And it's said in this article social

0:42:11.514 --> 0:42:15.514
<v Speaker 3>now is just used for punditory provocation and promotion. Does

0:42:15.594 --> 0:42:16.274
<v Speaker 3>that ring truth for you?

0:42:16.874 --> 0:42:20.393
<v Speaker 2>Yes? And it is my greatest concern, like reading this

0:42:20.674 --> 0:42:24.114
<v Speaker 2>about who we're leaving social media too, because I think

0:42:24.114 --> 0:42:27.834
<v Speaker 2>it's a very skewed vision of who people are, what

0:42:27.874 --> 0:42:33.274
<v Speaker 2>they care about, morality, ethics, tone, discourse, all of those

0:42:33.274 --> 0:42:37.954
<v Speaker 2>things being left to the content creators now. When someone

0:42:37.994 --> 0:42:41.154
<v Speaker 2>uploads something onto social media. It's sort of like, oh,

0:42:41.154 --> 0:42:43.314
<v Speaker 2>are you trying to be a content creator? You kind

0:42:43.314 --> 0:42:44.754
<v Speaker 2>of don't know why else.

0:42:44.754 --> 0:42:47.594
<v Speaker 3>It feels vulnerable because people talk about feeling cringe when

0:42:47.634 --> 0:42:48.354
<v Speaker 3>they post something.

0:42:48.394 --> 0:42:50.873
<v Speaker 1>But why is that bad? Why don't we just leave

0:42:50.914 --> 0:42:51.913
<v Speaker 1>it to the professionals.

0:42:52.194 --> 0:42:54.634
<v Speaker 2>I suppose the reason why I worry about leaving it

0:42:54.674 --> 0:42:59.994
<v Speaker 2>to the inadverted commas professionals is because of the tone

0:43:00.034 --> 0:43:03.274
<v Speaker 2>of that conversation. You get the extremes on both sides.

0:43:03.994 --> 0:43:06.794
<v Speaker 2>You get the people like exactly what it said here,

0:43:06.954 --> 0:43:08.913
<v Speaker 2>get people who are provocative on.

0:43:08.874 --> 0:43:13.034
<v Speaker 3>Purpose professionals, and we don't want to do it anymore.

0:43:13.114 --> 0:43:15.034
<v Speaker 3>You haven't posted on social for a long time.

0:43:14.874 --> 0:43:15.513
<v Speaker 1>Have you? No?

0:43:15.754 --> 0:43:18.994
<v Speaker 2>But like normal people, sometimes I have to go on

0:43:18.994 --> 0:43:20.834
<v Speaker 2>to TikTok and I scroll and I scroll, or I

0:43:20.834 --> 0:43:23.274
<v Speaker 2>scroll on Instagram and I go The normal people aren't here.

0:43:23.954 --> 0:43:26.194
<v Speaker 2>The normal people have left this party. The normal people

0:43:26.234 --> 0:43:29.913
<v Speaker 2>are all watching. It's like, you know what, it's like.

0:43:29.994 --> 0:43:33.074
<v Speaker 2>It's a party and it's four am, and all the

0:43:33.154 --> 0:43:36.594
<v Speaker 2>normal people with normal lives went home and you look

0:43:36.634 --> 0:43:38.634
<v Speaker 2>around and you think all parties are like this all

0:43:38.634 --> 0:43:41.154
<v Speaker 2>of the time, And people are throwing things and there's

0:43:41.234 --> 0:43:43.914
<v Speaker 2>vomit in the corner and there's like people on the

0:43:43.954 --> 0:43:46.794
<v Speaker 2>hard drugs and you're just looking around, going this is

0:43:46.914 --> 0:43:47.634
<v Speaker 2>this is terrible.

0:43:47.754 --> 0:43:49.794
<v Speaker 1>People telling me about Amazon Prime sales.

0:43:50.074 --> 0:43:51.594
<v Speaker 3>People being way too intense.

0:43:51.754 --> 0:43:54.634
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and it's descended into chaos, and you go, what

0:43:54.794 --> 0:43:56.953
<v Speaker 2>has happened to parties? And it's like, no, no, no, it's

0:43:56.994 --> 0:43:58.634
<v Speaker 2>not the party, it's the people.

0:43:58.354 --> 0:43:59.034
<v Speaker 4>Who are left.

0:43:59.194 --> 0:44:02.074
<v Speaker 1>But on the flip side, Jesse, I'm going to attempt

0:44:02.074 --> 0:44:05.274
<v Speaker 1>a more optimistic take on this trend, which is maybe

0:44:05.314 --> 0:44:08.114
<v Speaker 1>the normal people quote unquote I have just realized that

0:44:08.354 --> 0:44:11.194
<v Speaker 1>real life is much better than social media, and now

0:44:11.194 --> 0:44:14.794
<v Speaker 1>they're prioritizing IROL experiences. This is my theory as to

0:44:14.834 --> 0:44:17.034
<v Speaker 1>why we've all suddenly become obsessed with tennis. Have you

0:44:17.114 --> 0:44:20.514
<v Speaker 1>noticed that, yes, I know you always liked. Yes, Yes,

0:44:20.634 --> 0:44:24.314
<v Speaker 1>everyone's watching the Wimbledon front row this year so much

0:44:24.354 --> 0:44:27.114
<v Speaker 1>more than they ever have in past years. And I

0:44:27.154 --> 0:44:30.914
<v Speaker 1>feel like the hype around sporting events, around the eras tour,

0:44:31.154 --> 0:44:34.274
<v Speaker 1>around live music generally is because people are turning to

0:44:34.354 --> 0:44:37.194
<v Speaker 1>real life more. They're valuing it more. And I've noticed

0:44:37.194 --> 0:44:40.154
<v Speaker 1>that even in my group chats, particularly with American friends,

0:44:40.594 --> 0:44:43.074
<v Speaker 1>because the enormity of what's going on is difficult to

0:44:43.114 --> 0:44:47.274
<v Speaker 1>summarize and get at. People are even retreating from group chats,

0:44:47.354 --> 0:44:50.074
<v Speaker 1>or maybe they're just not talking to me. Either way, Yes,

0:44:50.274 --> 0:44:50.794
<v Speaker 1>I can't.

0:44:50.634 --> 0:44:52.234
<v Speaker 3>Believe you haven't said the word capitalism.

0:44:52.474 --> 0:44:55.194
<v Speaker 2>That's the thing, right, is that these social media companies

0:44:55.394 --> 0:44:57.754
<v Speaker 2>couldn't charge any of us to be on it, right,

0:44:58.074 --> 0:44:58.874
<v Speaker 2>And in fact.

0:44:58.714 --> 0:45:00.074
<v Speaker 1>There are those pictures of our breakfast.

0:45:00.154 --> 0:45:02.794
<v Speaker 2>Yes, that incredible documentary called The Social Dilemma made the

0:45:02.834 --> 0:45:06.394
<v Speaker 2>point that it is one of the widest used products

0:45:06.634 --> 0:45:08.994
<v Speaker 2>that every one would refuse to pay for. In fact,

0:45:09.074 --> 0:45:11.634
<v Speaker 2>most people not only wouldn't pay a dollary use that,

0:45:11.674 --> 0:45:14.794
<v Speaker 2>they would pay a dollar not And the only people

0:45:14.834 --> 0:45:19.674
<v Speaker 2>who have upheld these companies is advertisers. And I think

0:45:19.674 --> 0:45:23.514
<v Speaker 2>that that's eroded trust. But the reason why Amelia, I

0:45:23.554 --> 0:45:28.234
<v Speaker 2>think your optimism is totally misguided is because people have

0:45:28.274 --> 0:45:30.874
<v Speaker 2>not left the party and gone home. They are standing

0:45:30.914 --> 0:45:34.473
<v Speaker 2>by the windows, addicted to watching what's going on. If

0:45:34.474 --> 0:45:36.714
<v Speaker 2>you looked at the time people are spending on social

0:45:36.754 --> 0:45:39.634
<v Speaker 2>media that hasn't gone down, that has not gone down.

0:45:40.234 --> 0:45:42.874
<v Speaker 3>That's the thing we're not posting. We're lurking.

0:45:42.954 --> 0:45:43.114
<v Speaker 1>Now.

0:45:43.554 --> 0:45:48.434
<v Speaker 3>Men have always been lurkers, right, Women have always been posters, commenters, likers, sharers,

0:45:48.994 --> 0:45:52.954
<v Speaker 3>but now women aren't doing that anymore, not as much.

0:45:53.394 --> 0:45:55.514
<v Speaker 3>And as Jesse said, we're looking through the window and

0:45:55.554 --> 0:45:57.514
<v Speaker 3>the problem with that. If we've just left the party,

0:45:57.594 --> 0:46:02.314
<v Speaker 3>that's different. Let them, you know, eat, But because we're

0:46:02.314 --> 0:46:06.674
<v Speaker 3>watching it, it's skewing our idea of reality.

0:46:07.314 --> 0:46:12.754
<v Speaker 2>The other element to why millennials in particular stopped posting

0:46:13.674 --> 0:46:18.514
<v Speaker 2>is because we watched as the dumb stuff that the

0:46:18.554 --> 0:46:20.674
<v Speaker 2>famous people posted got dug up.

0:46:21.154 --> 0:46:23.234
<v Speaker 3>So the dig which we've talked about on this show,

0:46:23.274 --> 0:46:24.034
<v Speaker 3>it was weaponized.

0:46:24.114 --> 0:46:25.194
<v Speaker 2>It was all weaponized.

0:46:25.234 --> 0:46:28.194
<v Speaker 1>So I think what happened was Trevor Noah, Yes, when

0:46:28.434 --> 0:46:31.033
<v Speaker 1>was that he was named to the Daily Show chair

0:46:31.114 --> 0:46:33.234
<v Speaker 1>after John Stewart left, So that was when the Daily

0:46:33.274 --> 0:46:36.993
<v Speaker 1>Show was absolutely at its peak. Trevor Noah was named

0:46:36.994 --> 0:46:39.553
<v Speaker 1>the new chair and people dug up all these sort

0:46:39.594 --> 0:46:42.114
<v Speaker 1>of fat phobic, fat shaming tweets.

0:46:42.394 --> 0:46:45.834
<v Speaker 2>How many careers like have been I mean destroyed might

0:46:45.874 --> 0:46:48.194
<v Speaker 2>be too big a word, but have been impacted.

0:46:48.554 --> 0:46:51.393
<v Speaker 3>What's that idea of social excavation, which is why you know,

0:46:51.434 --> 0:46:56.634
<v Speaker 3>when Lauren Sanchez Bezos got married, she wiped her Instagram.

0:46:56.714 --> 0:46:58.754
<v Speaker 3>It's this idea and if you look at a gen

0:46:58.874 --> 0:47:03.154
<v Speaker 3>Zeta or Jen Alfa's social they'll only have on Maine,

0:47:03.354 --> 0:47:06.234
<v Speaker 3>which is in their feed. They'll only have like three

0:47:06.314 --> 0:47:09.354
<v Speaker 3>or four posts. For millennials and gen X's it was

0:47:09.434 --> 0:47:11.514
<v Speaker 3>like a record of everything.

0:47:11.634 --> 0:47:14.834
<v Speaker 1>Every time we didn't avocado toast in a sun dappled room.

0:47:14.754 --> 0:47:16.794
<v Speaker 3>You go back and it was a record of our relationships.

0:47:16.794 --> 0:47:20.554
<v Speaker 3>It was almost like a public diary. But this idea

0:47:20.594 --> 0:47:24.074
<v Speaker 3>of being perceived and not wanting to be perceived, that's

0:47:24.114 --> 0:47:26.674
<v Speaker 3>something that gen Z's and jen alf Is are much

0:47:26.714 --> 0:47:30.314
<v Speaker 3>more savvy about because they don't want people drawing conclusions

0:47:30.674 --> 0:47:33.834
<v Speaker 3>about them because of something they posted two weeks ago,

0:47:33.874 --> 0:47:34.873
<v Speaker 3>let alone two years ago.

0:47:35.074 --> 0:47:38.314
<v Speaker 1>That's why Travis Kelsey and Taylor Swift have never followed

0:47:38.354 --> 0:47:41.634
<v Speaker 1>each other on Instagram because they know that the unfollow

0:47:41.714 --> 0:47:43.314
<v Speaker 1>would be such a big story.

0:47:43.434 --> 0:47:47.554
<v Speaker 2>Which I find it interesting that jen Alphas and Z's

0:47:47.674 --> 0:47:50.274
<v Speaker 2>have pulled back because when I look at my own

0:47:50.314 --> 0:47:53.954
<v Speaker 2>social media usage, and if I'm being entirely honest with myself,

0:47:54.714 --> 0:47:57.554
<v Speaker 2>I think it was indexed a lot on whether or

0:47:57.634 --> 0:48:00.674
<v Speaker 2>not I was courting, like in my single life. So

0:48:01.194 --> 0:48:04.714
<v Speaker 2>I wonder if too, if you're on sort of hinge

0:48:05.194 --> 0:48:06.514
<v Speaker 2>or you're on bumble and.

0:48:06.554 --> 0:48:09.194
<v Speaker 3>You're but it's it's more curately dating. It's more curated

0:48:09.274 --> 0:48:10.794
<v Speaker 3>and with less shots.

0:48:10.594 --> 0:48:12.393
<v Speaker 2>Because you won't be paved when you're seeing You.

0:48:12.434 --> 0:48:14.913
<v Speaker 3>Don't want someone going back and seeing pictures of you

0:48:15.314 --> 0:48:18.234
<v Speaker 3>with your exes, or you don't necessarily want to be

0:48:18.434 --> 0:48:22.114
<v Speaker 3>known in that public way, whereas our generation it felt

0:48:22.154 --> 0:48:25.434
<v Speaker 3>like we really wanted to be known. It's like remember

0:48:25.474 --> 0:48:27.714
<v Speaker 3>my Space, which it was like what are your favorite books?

0:48:27.714 --> 0:48:28.754
<v Speaker 3>What are your favorite movie?

0:48:28.834 --> 0:48:31.194
<v Speaker 1>It happened quickly, Like I remember, I had my first

0:48:31.274 --> 0:48:34.554
<v Speaker 1>child in twenty eighteen, and practically the first thing I

0:48:34.594 --> 0:48:38.314
<v Speaker 1>did was post a picture of him on Instagram. By

0:48:38.314 --> 0:48:40.274
<v Speaker 1>the time I had my second child in twenty twenty,

0:48:40.314 --> 0:48:42.794
<v Speaker 1>I was not putting a photo of her on the

0:48:42.794 --> 0:48:43.513
<v Speaker 1>internet ever.

0:48:44.034 --> 0:48:44.354
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:48:44.394 --> 0:48:47.434
<v Speaker 2>Wow, A big thank you to all of you the

0:48:47.474 --> 0:48:49.954
<v Speaker 2>out loud as well. We we are done. That was

0:48:49.994 --> 0:48:53.033
<v Speaker 2>great for listening to today's show and our fabulous team

0:48:53.114 --> 0:48:55.754
<v Speaker 2>for putting this show together. We'll be back in your

0:48:55.794 --> 0:48:57.554
<v Speaker 2>ears tomorrow. Bye.

0:48:58.794 --> 0:49:02.154
<v Speaker 3>Shout out to any Muma Maya subscribers listening. If you

0:49:02.194 --> 0:49:04.554
<v Speaker 3>love the show and want to support us as well,

0:49:04.754 --> 0:49:07.234
<v Speaker 3>subscribing to Mom and Maya is the very best way

0:49:07.234 --> 0:49:09.714
<v Speaker 3>to do so there is a link in the episode description.